Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question

[Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <1165514748.328138.93510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
 "Paul" <softwarelabus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Richard Herring wrote:
> > In message <1165512119.690438.72210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul
> > <softwarelabus@xxxxxxxxx> writes
> > >Filth.  I feel dirty conversing with you.
> >
> > The solution is in your own hands.
> 
> 
> I'm still waiting big boy. :-)  I will continue to ask until you point
> out my error, in detail.  Again -->

Richard - give up. This guy makes Brad Guth seem sane. Though the 
underlying proof that he himself knows he's mad is that he refuses to 
take any of his so called science beyond his fevered rantings and 
actually build anything.

He'll pick on subjects to obsess on and refuse to admit his own errors. 
I still swear its Dennis B under a new name.

I imagine his wife (if he has one) even has to wire the plugs for him.

-- 

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com