sci.physics
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Landers on moon invisible?

Subject: Re: Landers on moon invisible?
From: The Ghost In The Machine
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 11:34:54 -0800
Newsgroups: sci.physics
In sci.physics, Phineas T Puddleduck
<phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 wrote
on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:51:12 +0000
<4597f9e5$0$18563$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 2006-12-31 17:17:49 +0000, "malibu" <vegan16@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>
>>>> 
>>> And you are a Duck.
>>> If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck,
>>> it's also ugly.
>>> John
>> And here's the proof.
>> http://www.cotse.net/users/jeffrelf/Jeff_Relf_Aug_2005.JPG
>
> You think I am Jeff?
>
>
> BWAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHA
>

Hmm, lessee here.

Jeff...Relf
Phineas T Puddleduck

Apart from the facts that your names start with a different
letter, that your name has no punctuation of any sort,
that they each contain a different number of letters,
and that there's a different number of names, naah,
they're virtually identical...

:-)

>
> -- 
>
> This space reserved for Jeff Relf's 5-dimensional metric.
>
>


-- 
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux.  The choice of a GNU generation.
Windows.  The choice of a bunch of people who like very weird behavior on
a regular basis, random crashes, and "extend, embrace, and extinguish".

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from                                 www.teranews.com">http://www.teranews.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy