sci.physics
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question

Subject: Re: 2nd law of thermodynamics in question
From: "Paul"
Date: 7 Dec 2006 10:05:48 -0800
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Richard Herring wrote:
> In message <1165512119.690438.72210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul
> <softwarelabus@xxxxxxxxx> writes
> >Filth.  I feel dirty conversing with you.
>
> The solution is in your own hands.


I'm still waiting big boy. :-)  I will continue to ask until you point
out my error, in detail.  Again -->

Paul wrote:
> I am still waiting for you to show everyone why the kinetic energy in
> electron flow causes *ZERO* voltage across resistive wire. Truthfully I
> am getting tire of waiting while you play your silly game of
> sidetracking in an attempt to save face.
>
> Lets analyze your problem. There is AC current in electrical wire. I
> have made several claims.
>
> 1. At any moment in time energy is moving in the direction of electron
> current flow.
> 2. Electron kinetic energy from electrical current causes a certain
> amount voltage across an electrical resistive wire.
> 3. There are other effects involved such as induction. A certain amount
> of energy contained in the magnetic field of such current.
>
> Lets first analyze #1, "At any moment in time energy is moving in the
> direction of electron current flow."
> Electrons have mass. A moving electron has kinetic energy. The kinetic
> energy is moving with the moving electron. Therefore, such kinetic
> energy is moving with and in the direction of current. It's well known
> electrons have mass. It's well known moving electrons have kinetic
> energy.
>
> Lets analyze #2, "Electron kinetic energy from electrical current
> causes a certain amount voltage across an electrical resistive wire."
> The electrical current has an average velocity. On average, one such
> electron will collide with another electron thereby transferring some
> of its kinetic energy. This causes a DC pulse, which traverses down the
> resistive wire.  The pulse dissipates due to electrical resistance,
> which generates a voltage across the wire. That is how you simplify the
> problem. By means of mathematics or computer simulation you can
> calculate the net results of all the DC pulses caused by X electrons in
> a specified length of wire. This concept is akin to magnetic material.
> Consider a coil around magnetic material where the current is
> increasing by di/dt. As the coils current increases there is a net
> opposing voltage across the coil. Although on an atomic scale within
> the magnetic material there are avalanches generating a similar DC
> pulse on the coil. The net result may appear as a steady constant
> voltage, but upon close analysis we know it is not steady due to many
> DC pulses caused by the avalanches. It's well known that electrons have
> mass. It's well known that a moving mass has kinetic energy.
>
> Lets analyze #3, "There are other effects involved such as induction. A
> certain amount of energy contained in the magnetic field of such
> current."
> As the current increases the net magnetic field increases, thereby
> increasing. It's well known that a magnetic field in a certain volume
> of space constitutes a certain amount of energy.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy