sci.physics (thread)

Trickle Down Mass Effect looks like missing mass., malibu, 2006/07/31
Free body diagram, boanerges35, 2006/07/31
- Re: Free body diagram, edprochak, 2006/07/31
  - Re: Free body diagram, boanerges35, 2006/07/31
- Re: Free body diagram, boanerges35, 2006/07/31
- Re: Free body diagram, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/31
  - Re: Free body diagram, boanerges35, 2006/07/31
    - Re: Free body diagram, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Free body diagram, boanerges35, 2006/07/31
- Re: Free body diagram, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/31
  - Re: Free body diagram, boanerges35, 2006/07/31
Re: Who Killed the Electric Car? Film Review, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/31
Is Six Billion Vibrations in the Micro Realm = one Second in The macro, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/31
Frame dependent distances in relativity?, jt64, 2006/07/31
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?, jt64, 2006/07/31
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/31
  - Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?, jt64, 2006/07/31
    - Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/31
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?, jt64, 2006/07/31
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?, Igor, 2006/07/31
Temperature and Pressure at atomic level?, joshipura, 2006/07/31
- Re: Temperature and Pressure at atomic level?, donstockbauer, 2006/07/31
- Re: Temperature and Pressure at atomic level?, mmeron, 2006/07/31
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 31, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2006/07/31
Thermal Conductivity and Specific Heat, Magna Mater, 2006/07/31
- Re: Thermal Conductivity and Specific Heat, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/31
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.6: GR 3-body Linear Gravitational Motion and W, OsherD, 2006/07/31
A question between electromagnetism and inertial reference frame, Muser, 2006/07/31
- Re: A question between electromagnetism and inertial reference frame, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/31
time, vyrtbg889y8bt6, 2006/07/31
- Re: time, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/31
  - Re: time, donstockbauer, 2006/07/31
- Re: time, John Bailey, 2006/07/31
Re: prof piano, you are a brillinat scientist, a brilliant man, whose intellect cannot be matched in the current scientific world, Gary Sokolich, 2006/07/30
The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/30
- Re: The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, hhc314, 2006/07/30
- Re: The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/31
- Re: The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, tadchem, 2006/07/31
  - Re: The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/31
    - Schoenfeld, persistent IMBECILE, dda1, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Schoenfeld, persistent IMBECILE, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/31
  - Re: The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, Spoonfed, 2006/07/31
- Re: The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, Lloyd Parker, 2006/07/31
The Scientific Community And The Yellow Brick Road To Fantasy Land, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/30
- Re: The Scientific Community And The Yellow Brick Road To Fantasy Land, Fermat, 2006/07/31
- Re: The Scientific Community And The Yellow Brick Road To Fantasy Land, BernardZ, 2006/07/31
"C" is a variable, Tom Potter, 2006/07/30
- Re: "C" is a variable, T Wake, 2006/07/31
  - Re: "C" is a variable, tdp1001, 2006/07/31
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.5: Information/Entropy and W, OsherD, 2006/07/30
Re: India makes wind energy turbines for USA, cnctut, 2006/07/30
Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, The Flavored Coffee Guy, 2006/07/30
- Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, Eeyore, 2006/07/30
  - Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, The Flavored Coffee Guy, 2006/07/31
- Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, cindy_mah, 2006/07/30
  - Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, nicksanspam, 2006/07/31
    - Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, News, 2006/07/31
  - Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, The Flavored Coffee Guy, 2006/07/31
    - Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, News, 2006/07/31
- Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, tj Frazir, 2006/07/30
Well well ... :-), Math Freak, 2006/07/30
- Re: Well well ... :-), Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/31
Advanced Physics Problem Solving Methods, kendity555, 2006/07/30
- Re: Advanced Physics Problem Solving Methods, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/30
- Re: Advanced Physics Problem Solving Methods, operator jay, 2006/07/30
  - Re: Advanced Physics Problem Solving Methods, donstockbauer, 2006/07/30
  - Re: Advanced Physics Problem Solving Methods, donstockbauer, 2006/07/30
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.4: One-dimensional Version of Hydrogen Molecular Ion in QM via W, OsherD, 2006/07/30
- Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.4: One-dimensional Version of Hydrogen Molecular Ion in QM via W, OsherD, 2006/07/30
A practical application of the Stefan-Boltzmann law, Juan, 2006/07/30
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.3: Projectile Range cs Resistance and Crosswind Via W, OsherD, 2006/07/30
Question about sci-fi physics, Aki Tuomi, 2006/07/30
- Re: Question about sci-fi physics, Jim Black, 2006/07/30
  - Re: Question about sci-fi physics, Edward Green, 2006/07/30
    - Re: Question about sci-fi physics, Jim Black, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Question about sci-fi physics, Mark L. Fergerson, 2006/07/31
"The Error in Relativistic Physics", Eht, 2006/07/30
- "The Error in Relativistic Physics", Eht, 2006/07/30
  - Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics", donstockbauer, 2006/07/30
    - Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics", Igor, 2006/07/30
Fields ??????, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/30
- Re: Fields ??????, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/30
  - Re: Fields ??????, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/30
- A field is a model of reality, like a map., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/30
  - Re: A field is a model of reality, like a map., Mark L. Fergerson, 2006/07/30
  - Re: A field is a model of reality, like a map., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/30
  - Re: A field is a model of reality, like a map., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/30
Wrong construing of the Boltzmann factor, E=h<nu> is wrong, h_v_ansari, 2006/07/30
- Re: Wrong construing of the Boltzmann factor, E=h<nu> is wrong, Salmon Egg, 2006/07/30
The Bullet Puzzle, Teja, 2006/07/30
- Re: The Bullet Puzzle, CWatters, 2006/07/30
- Re: The Bullet Puzzle, St.M, 2006/07/30
- Re: The Bullet Puzzle, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/30
  - Re: The Bullet Puzzle, Teja, 2006/07/31
    - Re: The Bullet Puzzle, jt64, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: The Bullet Puzzle, Edward Green, 2006/07/31
    - Re: The Bullet Puzzle, jt64, 2006/07/31
    - Re: The Bullet Puzzle, jt64, 2006/07/31
    - Re: The Bullet Puzzle, Edward Green, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: The Bullet Puzzle, jt64, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: The Bullet Puzzle, Edward Green, 2006/07/31
  - Re: The Bullet Puzzle, jt64, 2006/07/31
C-SPAN this Saturday, July 29th at 8 pm EDT, hetware, 2006/07/29
String Theory question, Robert Fischer Jr., 2006/07/29
- Re: String Theory question, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/29
- Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
  - Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 2006/07/30
    - Re: String Theory question, Golden Boar, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, Golden Boar, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: String Theory question, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: String Theory question, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: String Theory question, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, Robert Fischer Jr., 2006/07/31
      
      Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: String Theory question, Golden Boar, 2006/07/31
- Re: String Theory question, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/29
- Re: String Theory question, Edward Green, 2006/07/29
  - Re: String Theory question, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/31
- Re: String Theory question, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/29
- Re: String Theory question, Electric Monk, 2006/07/29
  - Re: String Theory question, Robert Fischer Jr., 2006/07/29
- Re: String Theory question, tdp1001, 2006/07/30
  - Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/30
    - Re: String Theory question, tdp1001, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, tdp1001, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, tdp1001, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, tdp1001, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: String Theory question, tdp1001, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/31
- Re: String Theory question, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/30
- The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/30
  - Re: The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., Robert Fischer Jr., 2006/07/30
  - Re: The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/30
  - Re: The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/30
    - Re: The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., T Wake, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., T Wake, 2006/07/31
work by magnetic forces - elementary question, cj, 2006/07/29
- Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
  - Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, cj, 2006/07/29
    - Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, tadchem, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, cj, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, Martin Hogbin, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, tadchem, 2006/07/31
- Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, Edward Green, 2006/07/29
- Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, will1, 2006/07/30
- Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, Jim Black, 2006/07/30
- Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, J. Horta, 2006/07/30
- Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, greysky, 2006/07/30
- Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/30
  - Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, Carrot Juice, 2006/07/30
buildings in free-fall, Edward Green, 2006/07/29
- Re: buildings in free-fall, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
  - Re: buildings in free-fall, Edward Green, 2006/07/29
    - Re: buildings in free-fall, Phil Holman, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: buildings in free-fall, Edward Green, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: buildings in free-fall, Phil Holman, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: buildings in free-fall, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: buildings in free-fall, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: buildings in free-fall, malibu, 2006/07/30
- Re: buildings in free-fall, Bruce Scott TOK, 2006/07/29
- Re: buildings in free-fall, blair . houghton, 2006/07/30
- Re: buildings in free-fall, Brian Whatcott, 2006/07/30
  - Re: buildings in free-fall, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/30
    - Re: buildings in free-fall, T Wake, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: buildings in free-fall, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/30
    - Re: buildings in free-fall, Brian Whatcott, 2006/07/31
MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, Juan, 2006/07/29
- Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, jimp, 2006/07/29
  - Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, Juan, 2006/07/30
    - Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, jimp, 2006/07/30
  - Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, Juan, 2006/07/30
    - Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, jimp, 2006/07/30
- Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, Edward Green, 2006/07/30
  - Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, Juan, 2006/07/30
Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, scientefeec, 2006/07/29
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Bill Hobba, 2006/07/29
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, LEJ Brouwer, 2006/07/30
  - Sabbir Rahman - Crackpot, dda1, 2006/07/30
    - Re: Sabbir Rahman - Crackpot, LEJ Brouwer, 2006/07/30
      
      Sabbir Rahman - Persitent and Perseverent Crackpot, dda1, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Sabbir Rahman - Persitent and Perseverent Crackpot, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/31
    - Re: Sabbir Rahman - Crackpot, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/30
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Lloyd Parker, 2006/07/31
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, surrealistic-dream, 2006/07/31
  - Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/31
    - Schoenfeld, CRETIN, dda1, 2006/07/31
      
      Jim Smithson aka (dda1), INTERNET FASCIST, David Thomson, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Jim Smithson aka (dda1), INTERNET FASCIST, dda1, 2006/07/31
- Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/30
  - Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, LEJ Brouwer, 2006/07/30
    - Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/31
  - Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, fishfry, 2006/07/31
    - Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, LEJ Brouwer, 2006/07/31
The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
- Re: The Physics Community, malibu, 2006/07/29
  - Re: The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
    - Re: The Physics Community, Timothy Murphy, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: The Physics Community, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: The Physics Community, schoenfeld1, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: The Physics Community, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/30
    - Re: The Physics Community, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: The Physics Community, CWatters, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: The Physics Community, malibu, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: The Physics Community, Jonathan, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: The Physics Community, Jonathan, 2006/07/31
- Re: The Physics Community, CWatters, 2006/07/29
- Re: The Physics Community, James Dolan, 2006/07/29
  - Re: The Physics Community, mtv2323, 2006/07/29
  - Re: The Physics Community, mtv2323, 2006/07/29
    - Re: The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
- Re: The Physics Community, Spoonfed, 2006/07/30
- Re: The Physics Community, Lloyd Parker, 2006/07/31
Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, G.L. Cross, 2006/07/29
WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, frank_k_sheldon, 2006/07/29
- Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
  - Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, frank_k_sheldon, 2006/07/29
    - Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Spoonfed, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Spoonfed, 2006/07/30
- Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, malibu, 2006/07/29
  - Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, donstockbauer, 2006/07/29
- The Angular_Diameter_Distance is 46 giga light-years., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/29
  - Re: The Angular_Diameter_Distance is 46 giga light-years., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/29
    - Re: The Angular_Diameter_Distance is 46 giga light-years., Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: The Angular_Diameter_Distance is 46 giga light-years., Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/29
  - GAB NOMINATION: Re: The Angular_Diameter_Distance is 46 giga light-years., Art Deco, 2006/07/29
- Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/29
  - Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, frank_k_sheldon, 2006/07/29
    - Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
    - Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, frank_k_sheldon, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/30
Re: The Environmentalists' Agenda, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/29
- Re: The Environmentalists' Agenda, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/29
Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, michelebargeman, 2006/07/29
- Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, dedanoe, 2006/07/29
- Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, Martin Hogbin, 2006/07/29
- Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
- Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, CWatters, 2006/07/29
- Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, Igor, 2006/07/29
- Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, Matthew Lybanon, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/29
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.2: Exponentiation and Papers on Lambert W, OsherD, 2006/07/29
- Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.2: Exponentiation and Papers on Lambert W, OsherD, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.2: Exponentiation and Papers on Lambert W, OsherD, 2006/07/29
What would it look like?, mike3, 2006/07/29
- Re: What would it look like?, Sorcerer, 2006/07/29
Re: E=mc2, Y.Porat, 2006/07/29
Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
- Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Phil Carmody, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Peter Webb, 2006/07/29
    - Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Phil Carmody, 2006/07/29
    - Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Proginoskes, 2006/07/31
  - Oh, those fun loving mathematicians..., Edward Green, 2006/07/30
    - Re: Oh, those fun loving mathematicians..., Jens Kruse Andersen, 2006/07/30
  - Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Michael Stemper, 2006/07/31
- Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, tadchem, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
- Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
- Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
  - Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/29
    - Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, jimp, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/29
    - Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/29
    - Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, tadchem, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
  - Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/29
- Re: An oceangoing sigless gps in my fish, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
OT: Ignore this crazy troll thread, Jim Smith, 2006/07/29
- OT: Ignore this crazy troll thread, Jim Smith, 2006/07/29
Rydberg atom mirror makes its debut, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/28
Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, ny2292000, 2006/07/28
- Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/28
- Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/28
- Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, dedanoe, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, Igor, 2006/07/29
OT: Ignore the sock-puppet troll "james_c_cracked", Jim Smith, 2006/07/28
- Re: OT: Ignore the sock-puppet troll "james_c_cracked", ward hardman is an ass, 2006/07/28
- Re: OT: Ignore the sock-puppet troll "james_c_cracked", Jim Smith, 2006/07/29
- Re: OT: Ignore the sock-puppet troll "james_c_cracked", Jim Smith, 2006/07/29
OT: Ignore worthless troll's posts, Jim Smith, 2006/07/28
- Re: OT: Ignore worthless troll's posts, wfh_jr, 2006/07/28
  - Re: OT: Ignore worthless troll's posts: I am losing everything, and there is no escape..., Raving Moonies. The Cult of Meow!, 2006/07/28
  - Re: OT: Ignore worthless troll's posts, Bill Snyder, 2006/07/28
Republicans Get The Message LOUD & CLEAR! DEFEAT!, platopes, 2006/07/28
Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert, Hoggle, 2006/07/28
Re: How to e-publish?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/28
- Re: How to e-publish?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/30
Anyone replicated this yet?..., CWatters, 2006/07/28
Sphere rolling down a sphere, MrX, 2006/07/28
- Re: Sphere rolling down a sphere, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/28
  - Re: Sphere rolling down a sphere, MrX, 2006/07/29
    - Re: Sphere rolling down a sphere, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/29
- Re: Sphere rolling down a sphere, Dr Chumley, 2006/07/28
  - Re: Sphere rolling down a sphere, CWatters, 2006/07/29
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/28
Calculator, janne, 2006/07/28
Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, hanson, 2006/07/28
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/28
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, cnctut, 2006/07/28
  - Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Traveler, 2006/07/28
    - Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, cnctut, 2006/07/28
    - Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, hanson, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Traveler, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Traveler, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, T Wake, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Traveler, 2006/07/31
- Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/28
  - Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, platopes, 2006/07/28
    - Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, Y.Porat, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 2006/07/30
      
      Man's Hell/Heaven lays in the fulfillment of his dreams., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 2006/07/30
      
      Hanson, platopes, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Hanson, hanson, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 2006/07/29
    - T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., hanson, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/30
      
      Ha_Ha_Hanson, which of my beliefs seems Christian to you ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, which of my beliefs seems Christian to you ?, T Wake, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, which of my beliefs seems Christian to you ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
      
      T.J., if you doubt me, send a private investigator., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., hanson, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., T Wake, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/30
    - Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/29
    - Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, hanson, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
our universe is merely 3 dimensional and 4 dimensional space-time is for irrlehrer Re: Pressure_Time_Space: When, where and _How_, a_plutonium, 2006/07/28
- Thee most basic/fruitful postulate of hard/soft science/religion., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/28
  - SI units can't model a Super_Planck_Density scenario., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/28
    - Re: SI units can't model a Super_Planck_Density scenario., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/28
  - Re: Thee most basic/fruitful postulate of hard/soft science/religion., T Wake, 2006/07/30
conversion formula, rob_6364, 2006/07/28
- Re: conversion formula, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/28
  - Re: conversion formula, rob_6364, 2006/07/28
- Re: conversion formula, Randy Poe, 2006/07/28
- Re: conversion formula, tadchem, 2006/07/28
- Re: conversion formula, CWatters, 2006/07/28
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), Pubkeybreaker, 2006/07/28
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), John Baez, 2006/07/29
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), John Baez, 2006/07/29
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), John Baez, 2006/07/29
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), John Baez, 2006/07/29
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), Timothy Murphy, 2006/07/29
  - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), Denis Feldmann, 2006/07/29
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), malibu, 2006/07/29
"Is String Theory Justified?", Eht, 2006/07/28
- "Is String Theory Justified?", Eht, 2006/07/28
  - Re: "Is String Theory Justified?", donstockbauer, 2006/07/28
Re: tension of wall of pressurized pipe, Bernhard Kuemel, 2006/07/28
- Re: tension of wall of pressurized pipe, Bernhard Kuemel, 2006/07/28
  - Re: tension of wall of pressurized pipe, Bernhard Kuemel, 2006/07/28
When, where and _What_., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/28
- Re: When, where and _What_., T Wake, 2006/07/28
- Re: When, where and _What_., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/29
  - Re: When, where and _What_., T Wake, 2006/07/30
Can electromagnets push?, marko . horvat, 2006/07/28
- Re: Can electromagnets push?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/28
  - Re: Can electromagnets push?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/28
    - Re: Can electromagnets push?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/28
- Re: Can electromagnets push?, will1, 2006/07/28
  - Re: Can electromagnets push?, Marko, 2006/07/28
    - Re: Can electromagnets push?, will1, 2006/07/28
    - Re: Can electromagnets push?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Can electromagnets push?, Marko, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Can electromagnets push?, Marko, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Can electromagnets push?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Can electromagnets push?, will1, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Can electromagnets push?, Marko, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Can electromagnets push?, will1, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Can electromagnets push?, Jim Black, 2006/07/29
- Re: Can electromagnets push?, Jim Black, 2006/07/28
one-ask, Ludo, 2006/07/28
- Re: one-ask, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/28
  - Re: one-ask, Ludo, 2006/07/29
- Re: one-ask, dedanoe, 2006/07/29
Hawking Radiation, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/28
- Re: Hawking Radiation, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/07/28
- Re: Hawking Radiation, dedanoe, 2006/07/29
- Re: Hawking Radiation, malibu, 2006/07/29
new microwave-based technique for analysing fresco paintings, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/28
What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, kendity555, 2006/07/27
- Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, jimp, 2006/07/28
  - Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/28
    - Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, kendity555, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, edprochak, 2006/07/31
  - Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, edprochak, 2006/07/28
  - Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Math Freak, 2006/07/30
- Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, J. Horta, 2006/07/28
- Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/28
- Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/28
- Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, carlip-nospam, 2006/07/28
- Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Math Freak, 2006/07/30
Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, hans . 1derful, 2006/07/27
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Bill Hobba, 2006/07/27
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/27
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/28
  - Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/07/28
    - Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, CWatters, 2006/07/28
    - Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, dlzc, 2006/07/28
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Jim Black, 2006/07/28
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, tomgee, 2006/07/28
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, gjedwards, 2006/07/28
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Igor, 2006/07/28
- Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/28
Re: Evening-Morning, duhme, 2006/07/27
Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Edward Green, 2006/07/27
- Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
  - Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Igor, 2006/07/28
    - Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Igor, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Richard Herring, 2006/07/31
      
      WTC7 9/11 Collapse theory, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Igor, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Igor, 2006/07/29
- Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Edward Green, 2006/07/29
- Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, hetware, 2006/07/29
- Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Math Freak, 2006/07/30
wiley interscience article needed, n00dle0@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/27
- Re: wiley interscience article needed, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/27
- Re: wiley interscience article needed, will1, 2006/07/27
Re: Franck-Hertz experiment is not quantized, Don Klipstein, 2006/07/27
Re: Understanding quantum mechnanics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/27
- Re: Understanding quantum mechnanics, T Wake, 2006/07/27
Re: theoretical explanation Re: In an Atom Totality E = mcc, but in a Big Bang or String theory E = mccc and higher, QncyMI, 2006/07/27
Re: time is the only dimension (RBF); Einstein & co. naked on the beach!, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 2006/07/27
Re: Pressure_Time_Space: When, where and _How_, a_plutonium, 2006/07/27
- Re: Pressure_Time_Space: When, where and _How_, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/27
Re: Wheel Cart + Aerodynamics, CWatters, 2006/07/27
- Re: Wheel Cart + Aerodynamics, tadchem, 2006/07/27
  - Re: Wheel Cart + Aerodynamics, Abstraction, 2006/07/27
    - Re: Wheel Cart + Aerodynamics, tadchem, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Wheel Cart + Aerodynamics, Phil Holman, 2006/07/27
- Re: Wheel Cart + Aerodynamics, cnctut, 2006/07/27
Hey Jeff, watch your neighbours don't see this, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/27
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Igor, 2006/07/27
- Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Matt, 2006/07/27
  - Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, mmeron, 2006/07/27
  - Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Edward Green, 2006/07/27
  - Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/28
  - Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Volker Hetzer, 2006/07/29
- Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, J. Horta, 2006/07/27
- Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, jonathan, 2006/07/28
- Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Claude, 2006/07/28
- Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, jonathan, 2006/07/29
- Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/29
  - Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/30
    - Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/31
Re: !MAKE MONEY USING PAYPAL- IT WORKS!, T Wake, 2006/07/27
- Message not available
  - OT: Pyramid Schemes (was Re: !MAKE MONEY USING PAYPAL- IT WORKS!), T Wake, 2006/07/27
Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, T Wake, 2006/07/27
- Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
- Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
  - Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/29
    - Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, T Wake, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/31
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.1: Generalized W Lambda Function, Dr Chumley, 2006/07/27
Re: simpleton question on stillborn universes, John Bailey, 2006/07/27
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/27
- Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, T Wake, 2006/07/27
- 3+ strikes... T.J. is out., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/27
  - Re: 3+ strikes... T.J. is out., T Wake, 2006/07/27
  - Re: 3+ strikes... T.J. is out., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/27
    - My sobriety., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: My sobriety., T Wake, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: My sobriety., Bill Snyder, 2006/07/27
- Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/27
- Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, T Wake, 2006/07/27
- Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/27
  - Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, hanson, 2006/07/28
- Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, hanson, 2006/07/28
  - Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
    - Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, hanson, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, tj Frazir, 2006/07/30
Re: Jamming the human senses, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/27
- Re: Jamming the human senses, Edward Green, 2006/07/27
- Re: Jamming the human senses, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/27
  - Re: Jamming the human senses, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/27
    - Re: Jamming the human senses, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Jamming the human senses, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Jamming the human senses, Tom Potter, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Jamming the human senses, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Jamming the human senses, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Jamming the human senses, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Jamming the human senses, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Jamming the human senses, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Jamming the human senses, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/31
    - Re: Jamming the human senses, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/31
- Re: Jamming the human senses, cnctut, 2006/07/27
- Re: Jamming the human senses, Greg Hansen, 2006/07/27
  - Re: Jamming the human senses, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
  - Re: Jamming the human senses, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/28
Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/27
- Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
- Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/27
  - Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
- Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, dedanoe, 2006/07/27
- Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, Mark L. Fergerson, 2006/07/27
- Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, Igor, 2006/07/27
  - Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/30
T.J. offered me a job, I declined... end of story., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/27
- Re: T.J. offered me a job, I declined... end of story., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/27
- Re: T.J. offered me a job, I declined... end of story., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/27
  - Re: T.J. offered me a job, I declined... end of story., tj Frazir, 2006/07/27
    - Re: T.J. offered me a job, I declined... end of story., T Wake, 2006/07/27
- Re: T.J. offered me a job, I declined... end of story., T Wake, 2006/07/27
anomalous spinning, top9, 2006/07/27
- Re: anomalous spinning, CWatters, 2006/07/27
  - Re: anomalous spinning, top9, 2006/07/29
    - Re: anomalous spinning, CWatters, 2006/07/29
- Message not available
  - Re: anomalous spinning, top9, 2006/07/28
A question on gyroscopic effects., Murmur, 2006/07/27
- Re: A question on gyroscopic effects., CWatters, 2006/07/27
Re: Lightning and Cars, John Bailey, 2006/07/27
- Re: Lightning and Cars, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/27
  - Message not available
    - Re: Lightning and Cars, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, John Bailey, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, panteltje, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, operator jay, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, John Bailey, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Lightning and Cars, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/29
Need help with an easy equation, Mike H, 2006/07/25
- Re: Need help with an easy equation, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
Re: NASA NUKED Jupiter !, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/25
Inflatable Sculpture Accident in England, gjedwards, 2006/07/25
- Re: Inflatable Sculpture Accident in England, Sorcerer, 2006/07/25
- Re: Inflatable Sculpture Accident in England, Edward Green, 2006/07/25
Spherical Coil, Martin Winer, 2006/07/25
Laser could create dark-matter particles ?!?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/25
- Re: Laser could create dark-matter particles ?!?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/25
Re: crap, Crap and MORE CRAP, uri, 2006/07/25
- Re: crap, Crap and MORE CRAP, T Wake, 2006/07/25
- Re: crap, Crap and MORE CRAP, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
  - Re: crap, Crap and MORE CRAP, uri, 2006/07/25
    - Re: crap, Crap and MORE CRAP, tadchem, 2006/07/25
    - Re: crap, Crap and MORE CRAP, T Wake, 2006/07/25
AIRES gives fatal error messages, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 2006/07/25
Re: "The Nuclear Boy Scout" on DVD (UK), donstockbauer, 2006/07/25
I want to learn quantum mechanics from scratch, Mike H, 2006/07/25
- Re: I want to learn quantum mechanics from scratch, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/25
- Re: I want to learn quantum mechanics from scratch, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/25
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Re: I want to learn quantum mechanics from scratch, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/28
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Re: I want to learn quantum mechanics from scratch, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/28
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Re: I want to learn quantum mechanics from scratch, Mirror Space, 2006/07/31
"The Properties of the Aether", Eht, 2006/07/25
Re: Einstein said: shit you ed up loons cant understand, tj Frazir, 2006/07/25
- Re: Einstein said: shit you ed up loons cant understand, T Wake, 2006/07/25
- Re: Einstein said: shit you ed up loons cant understand, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 786 July 25, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/25
- Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 786 July 25, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, mmeron, 2006/07/25
  - Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 786 July 25, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Bruce Scott TOK, 2006/07/31
    - Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 786 July 25, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, mmeron, 2006/07/31
software for pdes, thinktank, 2006/07/25
- Re: software for pdes, donstockbauer, 2006/07/25
Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/25
- Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Richard Schultz, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Uncle Al, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/27
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Thomas Johnson, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Richard Schultz, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/30
- Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/25
- Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Richard, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Tom M, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, tj Frazir, 2006/07/27
    - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, tj Frazir, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
      
      Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, jimp, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Salmon Egg, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Richard Schultz, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, mmeron, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, fkasner, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Richard J Kinch, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, platopes, 2006/07/25
  - Message not available
    - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 2006/07/27
  - Message not available
    - Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, terphenyl, 2006/07/29
use quantum mechanics to explain Relativity, johnson, 2006/07/25
- Re: use quantum mechanics to explain Relativity, Sorcerer, 2006/07/25
Re: NASA declines to protect the Planet Earth, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/25
- Re: NASA declines to protect the Planet Earth, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/30
E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2,easy and simple; Jewish religion stealing of Mileva Maric; attention please Michael Getler, PBS ombudsman, a_plutonium, 2006/07/25
- Mileva Maric contribution of 1905 Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2,easy and simple; Jewish religion stealing, a_plutonium, 2006/07/25
  - Message not available
    - Re: commission of women set up to find the true history behind Mileva Maric Re: Mileva Maric contribution of 1905 Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2, a_plutonium, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: commission of women set up to find the true history behind Mileva Maric Re: Mileva Maric contribution of 1905 Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/27
      
      CSI detective work on E = mcc Re: commission of women set up to find the true history behind Mileva Maric Re: Mileva Maric contribution of 1905 Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2, a_plutonium, 2006/07/28
- Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2,easy and simple; Jewish religion stealing of Mileva Maric; attention please Michael Getler, PBS ombudsman, Pubkeybreaker, 2006/07/25
  - Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2,easy and simple; Jewish religion stealing of Mileva Maric; attention please Michael Getler, PBS ombudsman, a_plutonium, 2006/07/25
- Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2,easy and simple; Jewish religion stealing of Mileva Maric; attention please Michael Getler, PBS ombudsman, Dom, 2006/07/25
  - Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2,easy and simple; Jewish religion stealing of Mileva Maric; attention please Michael Getler, PBS ombudsman, a_plutonium, 2006/07/25
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues, OsherD, 2006/07/25
- Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues, OsherD, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues, OsherD, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues, john Mrtiy, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues, john Mrtiy, 2006/07/25
- Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues, john Mrtiy, 2006/07/25
Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, mike3, 2006/07/25
- Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, george, 2006/07/25
- Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, ianparker2, 2006/07/25
- Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/25
- Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Cardinal Chunder, 2006/07/25
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Cardinal Chunder, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Bob Cain, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Cardinal Chunder, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, george, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Cardinal Chunder, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Edward Green, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, mike3, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Edward Green, 2006/07/30
      
      Message not available
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ian Parker, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, bryanjugglercryptographer, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, george, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, bryanjugglercryptographer, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Bob Cain, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Bob Cain, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, bryanjugglercryptographer, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ian Parker, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Bob Cain, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, mmeron, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/29
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Richard Herring, 2006/07/27
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, ianparker2, 2006/07/27
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, josephus, 2006/07/29
- Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Tom S, 2006/07/25
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Y.Porat, 2006/07/27
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, John Sefton, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
- Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
  - Message not available
    - Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Cardinal Chunder, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Cardinal Chunder, 2006/07/27
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/28
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/27
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.2: Time-Dependent Eigenvalues, OsherD, 2006/07/24
- Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.2: Time-Dependent Eigenvalues, john Mrtiy, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.2: Time-Dependent Eigenvalues, OsherD, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.2: Time-Dependent Eigenvalues, john Mrtiy, 2006/07/25
Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Rich Grise, 2006/07/24
- Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Lostgallifreyan, 2006/07/25
  - Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Michael A. Terrell, 2006/07/25
    - Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Lostgallifreyan, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Rich Grise, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Bob May, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Michael A. Terrell, 2006/07/25
- Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Rich Grise, 2006/07/24
- Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/24
back ground radiation, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/07/24
"Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Eht, 2006/07/24
- This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/28
  - Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., T Wake, 2006/07/28
    - Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Sam Wormley, 2006/07/28
      
      If Puddle_Chuck was smart..., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: If Puddle_Chuck was smart..., T Wake, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: If Puddle_Chuck was smart..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: If Puddle_Chuck was smart..., T Wake, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., T Wake, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., T Wake, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Sam Wormley, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/28
How big is the refraction index of flowing water?, PhadaMasci, 2006/07/24
- Re: How big is the refraction index of flowing water?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/24
- Re: How big is the refraction index of flowing water?, will1, 2006/07/24
Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/24
- Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
- Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., T Wake, 2006/07/24
- Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Bob Cain, 2006/07/25
  - Dee Dee: 24 years old, long red hair, a pirate/genius/whore/virgin., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Dee Dee: 24 years old, long red hair, a pirate/genius/whore/virgin., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Dee Dee: 24 years old, long red hair, a pirate/genius/whore/virgin., T Wake, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Thunderbird, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Gary Sokolich, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Bob Cain, 2006/07/25
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., the_ghostbuster, 2006/07/27
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., the_ghostbuster, 2006/07/27
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., T Wake, 2006/07/27
  - Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Bob Cain, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Bob Cain, 2006/07/25
Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Ocham, 2006/07/24
- Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Richard Herring, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Ocham, 2006/07/24
    - Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, CWatters, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, CWatters, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, T Wake, 2006/07/25
- Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, T Wake, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Ocham, 2006/07/24
    - Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, T Wake, 2006/07/24
- Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, cnctut, 2006/07/24
- Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Ian Parker, 2006/07/24
- Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, CWatters, 2006/07/25
- Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/30
  - Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Ian Parker, 2006/07/30
    - Doing grams of Heroin/Meth/Cocain... " jailing " a hot babe., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Doing grams of Heroin/Meth/Cocain... " jailing " a hot babe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Doing grams of Heroin/Meth/Cocain... " jailing " a hot babe., T Wake, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Doing grams of Heroin/Meth/Cocain... " jailing " a hot babe., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Doing grams of Heroin/Meth/Cocain... " jailing " a hot babe., T Wake, 2006/07/31
    - Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/30
      
      The hard-facts of science quickly fade to the soft-feelings of religion., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: The hard-facts of science quickly fade to the soft-feelings of religion., T Wake, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Ian Parker, 2006/07/31
Re: selfishness, uri, 2006/07/24
- Re: selfishness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
- Re: selfishness, T Wake, 2006/07/24
  - Re: selfishness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
    - Re: selfishness, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: selfishness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: selfishness, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: selfishness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: selfishness, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: selfishness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: selfishness, T Wake, 2006/07/24
- Re: selfishness, Igor, 2006/07/24
- Re: selfishness, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/25
- Re: selfishness, uri, 2006/07/25
  - Re: selfishness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
  - Re: selfishness, T Wake, 2006/07/25
- Re: selfishness, uri, 2006/07/30
  - Re: selfishness, PerfectlyAble, 2006/07/30
    - Re: selfishness, uri, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: selfishness, T Wake, 2006/07/31
Re: > > http://www.beyond-science.com/sigma.jpg http://www.beyond-science.com/index.html http://www.beyond-science.com/chess.jpg are the best and his website put out allot of numbers, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, PD, 2006/07/24
- Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Sorcerer, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, PD, 2006/07/24
    - Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Sorcerer, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Bob Cain, 2006/07/25
- Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Y.Porat, 2006/07/24
- Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, uri, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/24
- Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Sven Geier, 2006/07/25
- Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, blair . houghton, 2006/07/25
Gravitational Doppler, Lester Zick, 2006/07/24
- Re: Gravitational Doppler, J.A. Legris, 2006/07/24
- Re: Gravitational Doppler, george, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Gravitational Doppler, Lester Zick, 2006/07/24
- Re: Gravitational Doppler, rick++, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Gravitational Doppler, J.A. Legris, 2006/07/25
- Re: Gravitational Doppler, Lester Zick, 2006/07/30
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.1: Loop Quantum Gravity Contradicts Itself and Opens The Way for "Non-Euclidean" Dynamics, OsherD, 2006/07/24
- Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.1: Loop Quantum Gravity Contradicts Itself and Opens The Way for "Non-Euclidean" Dynamics, OsherD, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.1: Loop Quantum Gravity Contradicts Itself and Opens The Way for "Non-Euclidean" Dynamics, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/24
- Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.1: Loop Quantum Gravity Contradicts Itself and Opens The Way for "Non-Euclidean" Dynamics, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/24
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Bill Hobba, 2006/07/24
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/24
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/24
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Harry, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Harry, 2006/07/24
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., jmfbahciv, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., mmeron, 2006/07/24
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., jem, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., jmfbahciv, 2006/07/24
    - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., jem, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., jmfbahciv, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., tomgee, 2006/07/24
    - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., tomgee, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 2006/07/27
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., tomgee, 2006/07/24
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 2006/07/24
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., surrealistic-dream, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., surrealistic-dream, 2006/07/25
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., surrealistic-dream, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., surrealistic-dream, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/27
    - Koobee Wublee - Shit Eater, dda1, 2006/07/28
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Tom Roberts, 2006/07/24
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/25
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 2006/07/31
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Tom Roberts, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/28
    - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Tom Roberts, 2006/07/25
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Bob Cain, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., tomgee, 2006/07/25
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., ABarlow, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., jem, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Tom Roberts, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Schoenfeld, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., T Wake, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 2006/07/27
  - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Tom Roberts, 2006/07/27
    - Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Schoenfeld, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Randy Poe, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Sorcerer, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Randy Poe, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Sorcerer, 2006/07/28
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 2006/07/27
- Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., dda1, 2006/07/28
Re: How about a single-electron laser?, jimfoo, 2006/07/24
- Re: How about a single-electron laser?, Karim Lenhard, 2006/07/24
  - Re: How about a single-electron laser?, GPG, 2006/07/24
    - Re: How about a single-electron laser?, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/24
    - Re: How about a single-electron laser?, GPG, 2006/07/24
- Re: How about a single-electron laser?, tapwater, 2006/07/24
- Re: How about a single-electron laser?, tadchem, 2006/07/24
  - Re: How about a single-electron laser?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/25
Potential of Frequency as unifying measurment?, brian . zeligson, 2006/07/23
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Potential of Frequency as unifying measurment?, brian . zeligson, 2006/07/24
- Message not available
  - Re: Potential of Frequency as unifying measurment?, brian . zeligson, 2006/07/24
- Potential of Frequency as unifying measurment?, brian . zeligson, 2006/07/23
��j�s�Ѱ|, Verrine Hsu, 2006/07/23
Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
- Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/23
- Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, hetware, 2006/07/23
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/24
- Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
- Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, Y.Porat, 2006/07/24
Re: HOW EINSTEIN SHOULD HAVE RESOLVED THE TWIN PARADOX, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/23
"The Arrow of Time", Tde, 2006/07/23
Virtual Phonon and Superconductivity, tontoko, 2006/07/23
Phenomalism, uri, 2006/07/23
- Re: Phenomalism, Sir Frederick, 2006/07/23
  - Re: Phenomalism, uri, 2006/07/23
    - Re: Phenomalism, Milan, 2006/07/23
- Re: Phenomalism, mikegordge, 2006/07/23
- Re: Phenomalism, tadchem, 2006/07/23
  - Re: Phenomalism, WPR, 2006/07/23
  - Message not available
    - Re: Phenomalism, Igor, 2006/07/24
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Phenomalism, Igor, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Phenomalism, mmeron, 2006/07/24
  - Message not available
    - Re: Phenomalism, tadchem, 2006/07/29
- Re: Phenomalism, ilya_shambat2004, 2006/07/23
  - Re: Phenomalism, uri, 2006/07/23
- Re: Phenomalism, Insomniac, 2006/07/23
Help with math problem, William Hightower, 2006/07/23
Re: REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
Water And Nan electronics Will Mix To Create Ultra-dense Memory Storage Devices., studiescircle, 2006/07/23
'average driver has 1 crash per 1 million miles.'ONE NEWS.22/7/06., don . lotto, 2006/07/23
Audio Recording, TRIXSH, 2006/07/23
how many stars are there of which you are not certain nor aware?, dedanoe, 2006/07/22
- Re: how many stars are there of which you are not certain nor aware?, Robert J. Kolker, 2006/07/24
- Re: how many stars are there of which you are not certain nor aware?, Proginoskes, 2006/07/24
  - Re: how many stars are there of which you are not certain nor aware?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
Re: There is a God!, uri, 2006/07/22
- Re: There is a God!, T Wake, 2006/07/22
Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., raider.adam, 2006/07/22
- Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., Sam Wormley, 2006/07/22
  - Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., raider.adam, 2006/07/22
    - Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., Greg Neill, 2006/07/22
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., raider.adam, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., Randy Poe, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., raider.adam, 2006/07/24
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., raider.adam, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., Phil Holman, 2006/07/24
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 84.0: Quantum Gravity and Contact Transformations/Manifolds and Wrapping/Winding, OsherD, 2006/07/22
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 84.0: Quantum Gravity and Contact Transformations/Manifolds and Wrapping/Winding, OsherD, 2006/07/22
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 84.0: Quantum Gravity and Contact Transformations/Manifolds and Wrapping/Winding, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/22
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 84.0: Quantum Gravity and Contact Transformations/Manifolds and Wrapping/Winding, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/22
Neutrons, Bob, 2006/07/22
- Re: Neutrons, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/22
- Re: Neutrons, Randy Poe, 2006/07/22
- Re: Neutrons, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/22
  - Re: Neutrons, mmeron, 2006/07/22
- Re: Neutrons, Greg Hansen, 2006/07/23
Re: Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit or NOT!, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
- Re: Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit or NOT!, T Wake, 2006/07/22
- Re: Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit or NOT!, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
what's the point of conservation laws without perpetuum mobile second class (100% efficiency), dedanoe, 2006/07/22
- Re: what's the point of conservation laws without perpetuum mobile second class (100% efficiency), Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
  - Re: what's the point of conservation laws without perpetuum mobile second class (100% efficiency), dedanoe, 2006/07/23
Mathematicians routinely lie, jstevh, 2006/07/22
- Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/22
- Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Bill Snyder, 2006/07/22
- Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, tadchem, 2006/07/22
  - Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, jstevh, 2006/07/22
    - Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, jshsucks, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/22
    - Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, tadchem, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, jstevh, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Sorcerer, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Sorcerer, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, tadchem, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/22
    - Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Sorcerer, 2006/07/22
    - Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/22
- Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, rusty, 2006/07/22
  - Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/22
    - Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/23
- Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/22
  - Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/22
    - Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 2006/07/22
- Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Y.Porat, 2006/07/23
apparent paradox with charges, Sery, 2006/07/22
- Re: apparent paradox with charges, tadchem, 2006/07/22
  - Re: apparent paradox with charges, Randy Poe, 2006/07/22
- Re: apparent paradox with charges, Edward Green, 2006/07/22
- Re: apparent paradox with charges, srp, 2006/07/23
  - Re: apparent paradox with charges, Greg Neill, 2006/07/23
    - Message not available
      
      Re: apparent paradox with charges, Greg Neill, 2006/07/24
"The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Tde, 2006/07/22
Rigid body simulation, tavianator, 2006/07/22
- Re: Rigid body simulation, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
- Re: Rigid body simulation, John C . Polasek, 2006/07/22
- Re: Rigid body simulation, wdflannery, 2006/07/22
A new, physics-based approach to analyzing simple games, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/22
- Re: A new, physics-based approach to analyzing simple games, Proginoskes, 2006/07/24
  - Re: A new, physics-based approach to analyzing simple games, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/25
Optical atomic clock beats world standard, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/21
Organic transistors act as sensors, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/21
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 21 July 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/21
- Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 21 July 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/22
Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., Mook Johnson, 2006/07/21
- Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/21
  - Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., Edward Green, 2006/07/22
    - Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/22
- Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., Edward Green, 2006/07/22
- Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/22
  - Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., Edward Green, 2006/07/22
- Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., Andy Resnick, 2006/07/24
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 21 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/21
Re: Question about Black Holes, Jim Black, 2006/07/21
- Re: Question about Black Holes, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
  - Re: Question about Black Holes, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
    - GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      No 100 thousand dollar prize for Ben_Newsam., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: No 100 thousand dollar prize for Ben_Newsam., T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., T Wake, 2006/07/22
  - Re: Question about Black Holes, mmeron, 2006/07/21
    - Re: Question about Black Holes, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
  - Re: Question about Black Holes, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/21
force of a kite, tekhneek, 2006/07/21
- Re: force of a kite, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/21
- Re: force of a kite, cnctut, 2006/07/21
- Re: force of a kite, John C . Polasek, 2006/07/21
  - Re: force of a kite, Richard Herring, 2006/07/25
    - Re: force of a kite, John C . Polasek, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: force of a kite, cnctut, 2006/07/25
momentum of dipole, Sery, 2006/07/21
- Re: momentum of dipole, mmeron, 2006/07/21
- Re: momentum of dipole, Jim Black, 2006/07/21
- Re: momentum of dipole, Edward Green, 2006/07/22
just a little briefing, dedanoe, 2006/07/21
"The Einstein Hoax", Tde, 2006/07/21
- "The Einstein Hoax", Tde, 2006/07/21
Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Beemer, 2006/07/21
- Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, smallpond, 2006/07/21
  - Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Beemer, 2006/07/21
    - Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, tadchem, 2006/07/22
- Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jimp, 2006/07/21
  - Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Beemer, 2006/07/21
    - Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jimp, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Beemer, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Beemer, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jimp, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jimp, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jimp, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jimp, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 2006/07/21
- Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 2006/07/21
- Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 2006/07/21
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 87.41: The Cozmik Drival Continues on and on ......., Dr.Kooper, 2006/07/21
Three basic questions, Newton Wasp, 2006/07/21
- Re: Three basic questions, Sue..., 2006/07/21
  - Re: Three basic questions, Newton Wasp, 2006/07/21
    - Re: Three basic questions, Sue..., 2006/07/22
  - Re: Three basic questions, Sorcerer, 2006/07/22
- Re: Three basic questions, jimp, 2006/07/21
  - Re: Three basic questions, Newton Wasp, 2006/07/21
    - Re: Three basic questions, jimp, 2006/07/21
- Re: Three basic questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/21
  - Re: Three basic questions, Newton Wasp, 2006/07/21
- Re: Three basic questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/21
- Re: Three basic questions, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/21
- Re: Three basic questions, tadchem, 2006/07/22
  - Re: Three basic questions, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/22
    - Re: Three basic questions, tadchem, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Three basic questions, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Three basic questions, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/22
  - Re: Three basic questions, Sorcerer, 2006/07/22
  - Re: Three basic questions, malibu, 2006/07/22
    - Re: Three basic questions, tadchem, 2006/07/24
- Re: Three basic questions, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/25
Clarification, Diana, 2006/07/21
- Re: Clarification, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/21
- Re: Clarification, Jim Black, 2006/07/22
  - Re: Clarification, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/22
First stone for biggest solar power plant ever., Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/21
derivation of velocity formula for tense string, Wendy E. McCaughrin, 2006/07/21
- Re: derivation of velocity formula for tense string, CWatters, 2006/07/21
New look for graphene (Jul 20), Sam Wormley, 2006/07/21
- Re: New look for graphene (Jul 20), Uncle Al, 2006/07/21
  - Uncle_Al, how's Win_98 working out for you ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/23
Why tethered electrons?, Edward Green, 2006/07/20
- Re: Why tethered electrons?, China Man, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Why tethered electrons?, Y.Porat, 2006/07/21
    - Re: Why tethered electrons?, Edward Green, 2006/07/21
- Re: Why tethered electrons?, Igor, 2006/07/21
  - Re: Why tethered electrons?, Edward Green, 2006/07/21
- Re: Why tethered electrons?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/24
  - Re: Why tethered electrons?, Edward Green, 2006/07/24
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Why tethered electrons?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Why tethered electrons?, Mark L. Fergerson, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: Why tethered electrons?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/31
- Re: Why tethered electrons?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/29
  - Re: Why tethered electrons?, Edward Green, 2006/07/29
Planets 'capturing' an object, Dan in Philly, 2006/07/20
- Re: Planets 'capturing' an object, Randy Poe, 2006/07/20
- Re: Planets 'capturing' an object, mmeron, 2006/07/20
- Re: Planets 'capturing' an object, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/21
Re: WHO KILLED PHYSICS: CLAUSIUS OR EINSTEIN?, Timo Nieminen, 2006/07/20
Re: MUTUALLY INDEPENDENT velocity vectors?, Scott J. McCaughrin, 2006/07/20
- Re: MUTUALLY INDEPENDENT velocity vectors?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/21
  - Re: MUTUALLY INDEPENDENT velocity vectors?, Hero, 2006/07/21
Re: is entropy the Faraday law analog or the Ampere law analog Re:, QncyMI, 2006/07/20
- Re: is entropy the Faraday law analog or the Ampere law analog Re:, QncyMI, 2006/07/20
Matter decay and black holes, mike3, 2006/07/20
- Re: Matter decay and black holes, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Matter decay and black holes, mike3, 2006/07/21
- Re: Matter decay and black holes, noshellswill, 2006/07/21
Light and the Quantum Jump, Bob Cain, 2006/07/20
- Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/21
    - Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Sue..., 2006/07/21
- Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Timo Nieminen, 2006/07/20
    - Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Bob Cain, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2006/07/25
      
      Message not available
      Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Bob Cain, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Bob Cain, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2006/07/29
    - Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/21
- Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Sue..., 2006/07/20
  - Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/20
    - Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Sue..., 2006/07/20
- Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, srp, 2006/07/20
Arthur Kornberg, bloodIce . spelled, 2006/07/20
- Re: Arthur Kornberg, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Arthur Kornberg, bloodIce . spelled, 2006/07/20
- Re: Arthur Kornberg, tadchem, 2006/07/20
Shuttle Orbit Questions, Robert11, 2006/07/20
- Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, PD, 2006/07/20
- Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, smallpond, 2006/07/20
- Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/21
    - Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, marika, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/23
- Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Tde, 2006/07/20
- Nature doesn't care about our standards, especially at extreme densities., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/28
  - Nature doesn't care about our standards, especially at extreme densities., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/28
    - Re: Nature doesn't care about our standards, especially at extreme densities., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/28
  - Re: Nature doesn't care about our standards, especially at extreme densities., T Wake, 2006/07/28
  - Re: Nature doesn't care about our standards, especially at extreme densities., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/28
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Tde, 2006/07/20
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/21
DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Ed Conrad, 2006/07/20
- Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, donstockbauer, 2006/07/20
- Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Hagar, 2006/07/20
  - Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, donstockbauer, 2006/07/20
- Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/07/20
  - Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Hagar, 2006/07/20
    - Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/07/20
- Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/07/20
  - Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Hagar, 2006/07/20
    - Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/07/20
    - Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Hagar, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Sjouke Burry, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/07/22
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, T Wake, 2006/07/24
- Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Ed Otto, 2006/07/21
Re: It's all just smoke & mirrors, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/20
- Re: It's all just smoke & mirrors, Bob Cain, 2006/07/20
doomsday strategy based on self-field theory, tony fleming, 2006/07/20
- Re: doomsday strategy based on self-field theory, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/20
  - Re: doomsday strategy based on self-field theory, tony fleming, 2006/07/20
Asteroid impact temperature & pressure, radiation, mike3, 2006/07/19
- Re: Asteroid impact temperature & pressure, radiation, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Asteroid impact temperature & pressure, radiation, mike3, 2006/07/20
    - Re: Asteroid impact temperature & pressure, radiation, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Asteroid impact temperature & pressure, radiation, mike3, 2006/07/21
    - Re: Asteroid impact temperature & pressure, radiation, mmeron, 2006/07/20
Pebble: a nearly round object with a near-Gaussian distribution of curvatures, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/19
Custom-made Fiber Bragg Grating, Viki, 2006/07/19
Re: Relative motion from individual motion, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/19
Re: The psychology of creation myths, Peter, 2006/07/19
- Re: The psychology of creation myths, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/19
- Re: The psychology of creation myths, Edward Green, 2006/07/19
  - Re: The psychology of creation myths, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/07/20
- Re: The psychology of creation myths, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/21
  - Re: The psychology of creation myths, mmeron, 2006/07/21
Hack the Mirror, CoreyWhite, 2006/07/19
- Re: Hack the Mirror, tadchem, 2006/07/19
- Re: Hack the Mirror, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/21
  - Re: Hack the Mirror, Y.Porat, 2006/07/21
- Re: Hack the Mirror, Sue..., 2006/07/21
What Is Theta (temperature, entropy)?, W. Watson, 2006/07/19
my curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/07/19
- Re: my curses, Richard Herring, 2006/07/19
Teleportation,Levitation,Invisibility,Resurrection, jnadiaz, 2006/07/19
electrons/perpetual motion machine, bob, 2006/07/19
- Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2006/07/19
- Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/19
- Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, srp, 2006/07/19
  - Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, srp, 2006/07/19
    - Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, Greg Neill, 2006/07/19
- Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, PD, 2006/07/19
  - Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/19
    - Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, Randy Poe, 2006/07/19
    - Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, PD, 2006/07/19
- Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, Igor, 2006/07/19
  - Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, mmeron, 2006/07/19
- Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, tadchem, 2006/07/19
  - Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, srp, 2006/07/20
    - Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, Greg Neill, 2006/07/20
    - Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, tadchem, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, srp, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, tadchem, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, srp, 2006/07/20
SU(2), Edward Green, 2006/07/18
- Re: SU(2), José Carlos Santos, 2006/07/19
- Re: SU(2), PD, 2006/07/19
- Re: SU(2), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/19
  - Re: SU(2), Edward Green, 2006/07/19
    - Re: SU(2), James Dolan, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: SU(2), Paul Abbott, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: SU(2), Edward Green, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: SU(2), Lee Rudolph, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: SU(2), Edward Green, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: SU(2), Mark L. Fergerson, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: SU(2), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/21
Mechanic Gravity vs. Le Sage's Gravity, JoeT, 2006/07/18
- Re: Mechanic Gravity vs. Le Sage's Gravity, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/18
The Space Shuttle Program's New Creed (was: Electric force and charge), Rock Brentwood, 2006/07/18
Could you actually create a lightsaber???, nebx123@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/18
- Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/18
- Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/18
- Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, mmeron, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/19
    - Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, mmeron, 2006/07/19
- Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/19
- Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/19
- Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/19
- Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, CWatters, 2006/07/19
Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, PD, 2006/07/18
- Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, nebx123@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, malibu, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, PD, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, PD, 2006/07/19
- Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, cnctut, 2006/07/18
- Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, PD, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, T Wake, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/21
    - What a penniless Geek/Geezer I am !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: What a penniless Geek/Geezer I am !, PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Everyone is Patinha's fool., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Everyone is Patinha's fool., T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Everyone is Patinha's fool., Bill Snyder, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: What a penniless Geek/Geezer I am !, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Patinha makes me face my harsh reality., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Patinha makes me face my harsh reality., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Patinha makes me face my harsh reality., T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Patinha makes me face my harsh reality., PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., Randy Poe, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., cnctut, 2006/07/21
      
      Patinha is no charity case., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/21
      
      Electrons and such, cnctut, 2006/07/21
      
      Patinha is just having as much fun as she can... who isn't ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Patinha is just having as much fun as she can... who isn't ?, Bill Snyder, 2006/07/22
      
      Girls just want to have fun., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Patinha is just having as much fun as she can... who isn't ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Electrons and such, cnctut, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Patinha is no charity case., T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., Y.Porat, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Girls just want to have fun., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Girls just want to have fun., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Girls just want to have fun., T Wake, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., PD, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Patinha being with me (PD becomes a joker), Y.Porat, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Patinha being with me (PD becomes a joker), T Wake, 2006/07/23
- Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Y.Porat, 2006/07/20
- Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Edward Green, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Y.Porat, 2006/07/21
    - Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Y.Porat, 2006/07/21
Nuclear bomb design., reactor1967, 2006/07/18
- Re: Nuclear bomb design., Jim Black, 2006/07/18
- Re: Nuclear bomb design., Igor, 2006/07/19
- Re: Nuclear bomb design., tadchem, 2006/07/19
Geomagnetic field reason, h_v_ansari, 2006/07/18
- Re: Geomagnetic field reason, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/19
- Re: Geomagnetic field reason, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/19
- Geomagnetic field reason, h_v_ansari, 2006/07/30
  - Re: Geomagnetic field reason, tadchem, 2006/07/30
    - Re: Geomagnetic field reason, kdthrge, 2006/07/30
Re: Using lift to increase speeds., Paul O, 2006/07/18
OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, SmokeD, 2006/07/18
- Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/18
- Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Jim Black, 2006/07/18
- Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, PD, 2006/07/18
  - Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Sorcerer, 2006/07/20
    - Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, PD, 2006/07/20
- Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, CWatters, 2006/07/18
- Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Sorcerer, 2006/07/20
- Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Sue..., 2006/07/20
  - Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Harry, 2006/07/21
- Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/21
  - Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Sue..., 2006/07/21
exponential distribution entropy, theopps75, 2006/07/18
- Re: exponential distribution entropy, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/18
  - Re: exponential distribution entropy, theopps75, 2006/07/18
    - Re: exponential distribution entropy, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: exponential distribution entropy, theopps75, 2006/07/19
Coulomb's law, Peter, 2006/07/18
- Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 2006/07/18
- Re: Coulomb's law, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Coulomb's law, Greg Neill, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Coulomb's law, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/18
- Re: Coulomb's law, PD, 2006/07/18
- Re: Coulomb's law, Igor, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Coulomb's law, PD, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 2006/07/18
- Re: Coulomb's law, tadchem, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Edward Green, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Greg Neill, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, tadchem, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 2006/07/19
Animism versus nihilism, uri, 2006/07/18
- Re: Animism versus nihilism, Milan, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Animism versus nihilism, Sir Frederick, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Animism versus nihilism, uri, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Animism versus nihilism, Igor, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, tooly, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, uri, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, Morpheus, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, uri, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, Morpheus, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, Igor, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, Igor, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, tadchem, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, tadchem, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 2006/07/20
    - Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Animism versus nihilism, smallpond, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Animism versus nihilism, Igor, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, uri, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, Milan, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, smallpond, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, Morpheus, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, smallpond, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, tadchem, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, Igor, 2006/07/20
    - Re: Animism versus nihilism, Milan, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 2006/07/20
- Re: Animism versus nihilism, Igor, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Animism versus nihilism, chazwin, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 2006/07/20
- Re: Animism versus nihilism, Immortalist, 2006/07/18
- Re: Animism versus nihilism, tadchem, 2006/07/18
Where have all the flowers gone?, cnctut, 2006/07/18
- Re: [OT} Where have all the flowers gone?, Jim Black, 2006/07/18
- Re: Where have all the flowers gone?, mmeron, 2006/07/18
Help with math problum, William Hightower, 2006/07/18
- Re: Help with math problum, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/07/18
- Re: Help with math problum, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Help with math problum, William Hightower, 2006/07/18
- Re: Help with math problum, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/19
Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, joshipura, 2006/07/18
- Re: Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/18
- Re: Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, John Bailey, 2006/07/18
- Re: Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/18
- Re: Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, tadchem, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, Richard Herring, 2006/07/19
- Re: Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, Timo Nieminen, 2006/07/18
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.9: The Universe "Observation" Measured, OsherD, 2006/07/18
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.9: The Universe "Observation" Measured, OsherD, 2006/07/18
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.9: The Universe "Observation" Measured, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/18
Physics Investigation SOS!, shruti, 2006/07/18
What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Radium, 2006/07/17
- Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Eeyore, 2006/07/17
  - Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Steve, 2006/07/18
- Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/17
  - Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Radium, 2006/07/17
- Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jimp, 2006/07/17
  - Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 2006/07/18
    - Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jimp, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Tom M, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 2006/07/18
    - Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Radium, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jimp, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Eeyore, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Rich Grise, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Bob Myers, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Rich Grise, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Eeyore, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Don Bruder, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jeff, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Damon Hill, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Pat B., 2006/07/21
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, STEVE ROBERTS, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Radium, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Eeyore, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Greg Hansen, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Rich Grise, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Eeyore, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Lostgallifreyan, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Rich Grise, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Lostgallifreyan, 2006/07/22
- Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Don Klipstein, 2006/07/18
- Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, C what I mean, 2006/07/18
  - Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 2006/07/18
- Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Pat B., 2006/07/18
  - Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Don Bruder, 2006/07/18
- Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Pat B., 2006/07/18
  - Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Louis Boyd, 2006/07/18
    - Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Pat B., 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Don Bruder, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Lord Garth, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Don Bruder, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, C what I mean, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Lostgallifreyan, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Lostgallifreyan, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, C what I mean, 2006/07/19
    - Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Bob Myers, 2006/07/18
- Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Externet, 2006/07/18
  - Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, pbdelete, 2006/07/19
- Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, nicked, 2006/07/23
Watch Your Speed, virtualadepts, 2006/07/17
- Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Watch Your Speed, virtualadepts, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, CoreyWhite, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, jimp, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, jimp, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, Corey, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, jimp, 2006/07/18
      
      We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, CoreyWhite, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, tadchem, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Corey, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, tadchem, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Y.Porat, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Corey, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Lloyd Parker, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, CoreyWhite, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, CoreyWhite, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, CoreyWhite, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, R Philip Dowds, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Lloyd Parker, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, riplin, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, jimp, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, riplin, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, PD, 2006/07/19
    - Re: Watch Your Speed, Igor, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Watch Your Speed, ianparker2, 2006/07/18
- Re: Watch Your Speed, CWatters, 2006/07/18
- Re: Watch Your Speed, Roy. Just Roy., 2006/07/18
  - Re: Watch Your Speed, CoreyWhite, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Watch Your Speed, tadchem, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 2006/07/21
  - Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 2006/07/21
- Re: Watch Your Speed, Mike, 2006/07/18
- Re: Watch Your Speed, Igor, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Watch Your Speed, Ian Parker, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Watch Your Speed, Robert Weldon, 2006/07/19
    - Re: Watch Your Speed, Randy Poe, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, Randy Poe, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Watch Your Speed, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
- Re: Watch Your Speed, Paul Cardinale, 2006/07/18
Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 2006/07/17
- Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, hhc314, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Y.Porat, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Igor, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, hhc314, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Greg Neill, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Greg Neill, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, daestrom, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, hhc314, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Sergey, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Y.Porat, 2006/07/22
- Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Y.Porat, 2006/07/18
- Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, PD, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, mmeron, 2006/07/18
- Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, srp, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, hhc314, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, srp, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Greg Neill, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, hhc314, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, srp, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Y.Porat, 2006/07/19
    - Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, The Real Chris, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Y.Porat, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Mark Fortune, 2006/07/20
- Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, The Real Chris, 2006/07/20
[Newbie] General (special?) relativity question, C. Tellermann, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Newbie] General (special?) relativity question, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/17
  - Re: [Newbie] General (special?) relativity question, C. Tellermann, 2006/07/17
    - Re: [Newbie] General (special?) relativity question, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/18
- Re: General (special?) relativity question, Sue..., 2006/07/17
  - Re: General (special?) relativity question, C. Tellermann, 2006/07/17
- Objects/Humans moving very close to c., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Objects/Humans moving very close to c., PD, 2006/07/19
    - Re: Objects/Humans moving very close to c., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Objects/Humans moving very close to c., PD, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Objects/Humans moving very close to c., T Wake, 2006/07/19
    - Re: Objects/Humans moving very close to c., Bill Snyder, 2006/07/19
In double well potential use of instantons and path integrals, gopika, 2006/07/17
NO GRAVITATIONAL FORCE IS NECESSARY, ACE, 2006/07/17
- Re: NO GRAVITATIONAL FORCE IS NECESSARY, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/17
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 785 July 17, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/17
Ionizing Fans, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 2006/07/17
- Re: Ionizing Fans, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Ionizing Fans, Greg Hansen, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Ionizing Fans, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/17
- Re: Ionizing Fans, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/17
- Re: Ionizing Fans, Jim Black, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Ionizing Fans, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 2006/07/18
- Re: Ionizing Fans, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/07/23
  - Re: Ionizing Fans, Sorcerer, 2006/07/23
Matrialism is nihilism, uri, 2006/07/17
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Tron, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Matrialism is nihilism, chazwin, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Matrialism is nihilism, GatherNoMoss, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Bert Hickman, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Tron, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Matrialism is nihilism, chazwin, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Tron, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Igor, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Tron, 2006/07/19
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, blair . houghton, 2006/07/17
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Igor, 2006/07/17
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Josef Matz, 2006/07/17
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, theomonistik, 2006/07/17
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, theomonistik, 2006/07/17
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, theomonistik, 2006/07/17
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, theomonistik, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Matrialism is nihilism, uri, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Matrialism is nihilism, wbarwell, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Igor, 2006/07/18
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Mike, 2006/07/17
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Wordsmith, 2006/07/17
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Don H, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/07/18
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Tim, 2006/07/17
- Re: Materialism is nihilism, wbarwell, 2006/07/17
- Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., uri, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., kunzmilan, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., uri, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., Igor, 2006/07/18
      
      There is no beginning and every rock eventually gets dissipated., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: There is no beginning and every rock eventually gets dissipated., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: There is no beginning and every rock eventually gets dissipated., Igor, 2006/07/19
      
      God's retards., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: God's retards., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: God's retards., tadchem, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: God's retards., Edward Green, 2006/07/20
      
      Answering the question, " Does God exist ? "., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Answering the question, " Does God exist ? "., T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: God's retards., T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      We're still in a tech-bust and I expect it will bottom out around 2015., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: There is no beginning and every rock eventually gets dissipated., T Wake, 2006/07/19
    - Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., Igor, 2006/07/18
    - Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., uri, 2006/07/20
      
      Why can't humans live in much hotter/colder environments ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Why can't humans live in much hotter/colder environments ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., tadchem, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., uri, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      If a God created you..., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: If a God created you..., T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., Igor, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., uri, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., CyrilGrey, 2006/07/22
    - Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., PD, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., Bill Snyder, 2006/07/18
- Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Immortalist, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Matrialism is nihilism, uri, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Matrialism is nihilism, PD, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Matrialism is nihilism, uri, 2006/07/19
- Re: Materialism is nihilism, tadchem, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Materialism is nihilism, tg, 2006/07/18
    - Re: Materialism is nihilism, tadchem, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 2006/07/19
    - Re: Materialism is nihilism, Igor, 2006/07/19
    - Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, john fernbach, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, noshellswill, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, fernbach1948, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, Igor, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, Igor, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, fernbach1948, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, noshellswill, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 2006/07/22
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, tadchem, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, Robert Kopp, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, noshellswill, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, fernbach1948, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 2006/07/20
Vector-based gravitational calculations, Michel Rouzic, 2006/07/17
- Re: Vector-based gravitational calculations, Randy Poe, 2006/07/17
Miniaturizing A Rail Gun?, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/17
- Re: Miniaturizing A Rail Gun?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/17
The IQ particle, Prof . Uno di Pietra Alberti, 2006/07/17
- Re: The IQ particle, GatherNoMoss, 2006/07/17
- Re: The IQ particle, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/17
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 17, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2006/07/17
First AA batery powered manned flight!, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/17
- Re: First AA batery powered manned flight!, CWatters, 2006/07/17
Intelligent designer, uri, 2006/07/17
- Re: Intelligent designer, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Intelligent designer, uri, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Intelligent designer, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Intelligent designer, T Wake, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Intelligent designer, Matthew Lybanon, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Intelligent designer, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/18
- Re: Intelligent designer, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/07/17
- Re: Intelligent designer, John Christiansen, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Intelligent designer, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/17
- Re: Intelligent designer, T Wake, 2006/07/17
- Re: Intelligent designer, Igor, 2006/07/17
- Re: Intelligent designer, Mike, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Intelligent designer, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Intelligent designer, Mike, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Intelligent designer, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Intelligent designer, Igor, 2006/07/18
- Re: Intelligent designer, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/18
- Who was Satan incarnate ( thus infinitely stupid ) ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Who was Satan incarnate ( thus infinitely stupid ) ?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Who was Satan incarnate ( thus infinitely stupid ) ?, T Wake, 2006/07/19
    - Re: Who was Satan incarnate ( thus infinitely stupid ) ?, Morpheus, 2006/07/19
      
      Gaining control., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Gaining control., Bill Snyder, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Gaining control., T Wake, 2006/07/20
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.8: Operator-Exponent-Raising Yields Acceleration, OsherD, 2006/07/17
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.8: Operator-Exponent-Raising Yields Acceleration, OsherD, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.8: Operator-Exponent-Raising Yields Acceleration, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/17
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.8: Operator-Exponent-Raising Yields Acceleration, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/17
adiabatic process--why so important?, W. Watson, 2006/07/16
- Re: adiabatic process--why so important?, hhc314, 2006/07/16
  - Re: adiabatic process--why so important?, Richard Herring, 2006/07/17
  - Re: adiabatic process--why so important?, W. Watson, 2006/07/17
- Re: adiabatic process--why so important?, Edward Green, 2006/07/16
  - Re: adiabatic process--why so important?, Richard Herring, 2006/07/17
  - Re: adiabatic process--why so important?, W. Watson, 2006/07/17
gravity as a field distortion...what ?, bert, 2006/07/16
- Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, Sue..., 2006/07/16
  - Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, boson boss, 2006/07/17
- Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, Paul Cardinale, 2006/07/16
- Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, Jim Black, 2006/07/17
- Mass_Energy doesn't warp just space ! it warps time too., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Mass_Energy doesn't warp just space ! it warps time too., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/17
    - I'd like to cruise the Tongass with Patinha_Minha this summer., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: I'd like to cruise the Tongass with Patinha_Minha this summer., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/17
      
      Cranks_Reply, I'm supposed to believe you because... ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Cranks_Reply, I'm supposed to believe you because... ?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Cranks_Reply, I'm supposed to believe you because... ?, T Wake, 2006/07/17
      
      Doing a lot of drugs is a form of obesity., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Doing a lot of drugs is a form of obesity., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Doing a lot of drugs is a form of obesity., T Wake, 2006/07/18
      
      Paying Taxes/Rent., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Paying Taxes/Rent., T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: I'd like to cruise the Tongass with Patinha_Minha this summer., T Wake, 2006/07/17
      
      Patinha_Minha is Exhibit_A for my postulate., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Patinha_Minha is Exhibit_A for my postulate., T Wake, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Patinha_Minha is Exhibit_A for my postulate., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/19
      
      Rich pigs, good... poor pigs, bad ? !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Rich pigs, good... poor pigs, bad ? !, T Wake, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Mass_Energy doesn't warp just space ! it warps time too., T Wake, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Mass_Energy doesn't warp just space ! it warps time too., Paul Cardinale, 2006/07/17
    - Omega_Lambda( z )., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Omega_Lambda( z )., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Omega_Lambda( z )., T Wake, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Omega_Lambda( z )., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Mass_Energy doesn't warp just space ! it warps time too., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/18
- Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, T Wake, 2006/07/17
- Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, Igor, 2006/07/17
  - Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, kunzmilan, 2006/07/18
The Ethics of Profiting from Foreknowledge (was: Earth acceleration and earthquake triggering Jan 9, 2003), markwh04, 2006/07/16
- Re: The Ethics of Profiting from Foreknowledge (was: Earth acceleration and earthquake triggering Jan 9, 2003), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/17
  - Re: The Ethics of Profiting from Foreknowledge (was: Earth acceleration and earthquake triggering Jan 9, 2003), Ben Newsam, 2006/07/17
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.7: Quantum Gravity via Observer-Perception Theory, OsherD, 2006/07/16
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.7: Quantum Gravity via Observer-Perception Theory, xxein, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.7: Quantum Gravity via Observer-Perception Theory, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/17
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.7: Quantum Gravity via Observer-Perception Theory, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/17
Re: New Inductance, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/16
- Re: New Inductance, Richard Herring, 2006/07/19
Physics on a sunny day, Edward Green, 2006/07/16
- Re: Physics on a sunny day, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Physics on a sunny day, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/16
    - Re: Physics on a sunny day, mmeron, 2006/07/16
    - Re: Physics on a sunny day, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Physics on a sunny day, Timo Nieminen, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Physics on a sunny day, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Physics on a sunny day, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Physics on a sunny day, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/18
- Re: Physics on a sunny day, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/16
- Re: Physics on a sunny day, cnctut, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Physics on a sunny day, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Physics on a sunny day, blair . houghton, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Physics on a sunny day, Edward Green, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Physics on a sunny day, Timo Nieminen, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Physics on a sunny day, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Physics on a sunny day, Richard Herring, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Physics on a sunny day, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Physics on a sunny day, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/18
- Re: Physics on a sunny day, Sue..., 2006/07/16
- Re: Physics on a sunny day, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/17
- Re: Physics on a sunny day, Jeff, 2006/07/17
New Forums: PhysicsMathForums.com allow physicists to think independently!! Moving beyond the String Theory Hoax, drelliot, 2006/07/16
- The with you , troll, dda1, 2006/07/16
  - Re: The with you , troll, drelliot, 2006/07/16
Sturcture of an atom, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
- Re: Sturcture of an atom, malibu, 2006/07/16
- Re: Sturcture of an atom, Jim Black, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Sturcture of an atom, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
    - Re: Sturcture of an atom, Paul Cardinale, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, kdthrge, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Sturcture of an atom, PD, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, Randy Poe, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, Randy Poe, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, PD, 2006/07/18
- Re: Sturcture of an atom, Y.Porat, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Sturcture of an atom, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Sturcture of an atom, Y.Porat, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, Y.Porat, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, Y.Porat, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Sturcture of an atom, Y.Porat, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Sturcture of an atom, Igor, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Sturcture of an atom, Y.Porat, 2006/07/18
  - Re: Sturcture of an atom, Mark_Cordier, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Sturcture of an atom, Mark_Cordier, 2006/07/19
    - Re: Sturcture of an atom, S. Enterprize Company, 2006/07/21
Virtual electrical flow?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
- Re: Virtual electrical flow?, Jim Black, 2006/07/16
Infinite reciporal interactions?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
- Re: Infinite reciporal interactions?, Jim Black, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Infinite reciporal interactions?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
- Re: Infinite reciporal interactions?, tadchem, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Infinite reciporal interactions?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
- Re: Infinite reciporal interactions?, Igor, 2006/07/17
If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, frank_k_sheldon, 2006/07/16
- Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/16
  - Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, frank_k_sheldon, 2006/07/16
    - Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/16
    - Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Y.Porat, 2006/07/16
- Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, malibu, 2006/07/16
  - Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, frank_k_sheldon, 2006/07/16
    - Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, malibu, 2006/07/16
- Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Sue..., 2006/07/16
  - Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, frank_k_sheldon, 2006/07/16
    - Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Sue..., 2006/07/16
      
      Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, frank_k_sheldon, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Sue..., 2006/07/17
- Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Y.Porat, 2006/07/16
- Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Len Gaasenbeek, 2006/07/17
Mutual Induction inside Atom?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
- Re: Mutual Induction inside Atom?, Jim Black, 2006/07/16
- Re: Mutual Induction inside Atom?, tadchem, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Mutual Induction inside Atom?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
    - Re: Mutual Induction inside Atom?, tadchem, 2006/07/17
The world of finite energy?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
- Re: The world of finite energy?, G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/16
- Re: The world of finite energy?, Paul Cardinale, 2006/07/16
- Re: The world of finite energy?, uri, 2006/07/17
  - Re: The world of finite energy?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/17
  - Re: The world of finite energy?, Y.Porat, 2006/07/17
- Re: The world of finite energy?, PD, 2006/07/17
Electromagnetic field bend the space?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
- Re: Electromagnetic field bend the space?, uri, 2006/07/16
- Re: Electromagnetic field bend the space?, Jim Black, 2006/07/16
- Re: Electromagnetic field bend the space?, Igor, 2006/07/17
K.E.=P.E. in roller coaster?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
- Re: K.E.=P.E. in roller coaster?, Paul Cardinale, 2006/07/16
Falling Magnet, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
- Re: Falling Magnet, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/07/16
Relativity in Daily Life?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
- Re: Relativity in Daily Life?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Relativity in Daily Life?, G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/18
- Re: Relativity in Daily Life?, J. Horta, 2006/07/17
No Back EMF in Magnet?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/16
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.6: Exponential Decay in Toeplitz Matrices and Energy-Mass Conservation, OsherD, 2006/07/16
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.6: Exponential Decay in Toeplitz Matrices and Energy-Mass Conservation, xxein, 2006/07/16
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.6: Exponential Decay in Toeplitz Matrices and Energy-Mass Conservation, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/17
Infinite (as in "Infinite Universe") And Infinitesimal Indistinguishable From...., G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/16
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 2006/07/15
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 2006/07/15
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 2006/07/16
    - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, donstockbauer, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, vanep, 2006/07/16
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, xxein, 2006/07/16
Field-Temperature interaction?, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/15
- Re: Field-Temperature interaction?, kunzmilan, 2006/07/18
Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/15
- Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Sue..., 2006/07/15
- Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Jim Black, 2006/07/15
  - Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Jim Black, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Jim Black, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Jim Black, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Edward Green, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Jim Black, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Edward Green, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Jim Black, 2006/07/28
    - Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Sue..., 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Sue..., 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Sue..., 2006/07/22
    - Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Edward Green, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Edward Green, 2006/07/25
    - Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, carlip-nospam, 2006/07/22
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Edward Green, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, carlip-nospam, 2006/07/30
- Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/25
  - Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/25
Defeating Maxwell's Demon, Jack Sarfatti, 2006/07/15
Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, pmlonline, 2006/07/15
- Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, pmlonline, 2006/07/16
    - Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, pmlonline, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, tadchem, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, pmlonline, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, tadchem, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, pmlonline, 2006/07/18
- Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, pmlonline, 2006/07/16
Positioning of gas using air ionization, Neo, 2006/07/15
- Re: Positioning of gas using air ionization, CWatters, 2006/07/15
  - Re: Positioning of gas using air ionization, Neo, 2006/07/15
- Re: Positioning of gas using air ionization, Greg Hansen, 2006/07/16
- Re: Positioning of gas using air ionization, tadchem, 2006/07/16
- Re: Positioning of gas using air ionization, Neo, 2006/07/17
Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA, jollyrogership, 2006/07/15
- Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA, James Waldby, 2006/07/15
- Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA, Bill Hobba, 2006/07/15
  - Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA, drelliot, 2006/07/16
    - Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA, Bill Hobba, 2006/07/16
- Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate., T Wake, 2006/07/17
    - Re: MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate., drelliot, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate., T Wake, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/18
Quantum electo dynamical Cellular Automata, Zitterbewegung, 2006/07/15
stars, JoeT, 2006/07/15
- Re: stars, T Wake, 2006/07/15
- Re: stars, Igor, 2006/07/15
- Re: stars, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/15
  - Re: stars, Math Freak, 2006/07/15
  - Re: stars, JoeT, 2006/07/17
    - Re: stars, T Wake, 2006/07/17
- Are black holes time-dilated Supernovae/White_Holes ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Are black holes time-dilated Supernovae/White_Holes ?, T Wake, 2006/07/20
  - Re: Are black holes time-dilated Supernovae/White_Holes ?, JoeT, 2006/07/21
    - Relativistic Quantum field theories., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Relativistic Quantum field theories., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
My Questions, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/15
- Re: My Questions, neo, 2006/07/15
- Re: My Questions, neo, 2006/07/16
- Re: My Questions, tadchem, 2006/07/16
- Re: My Questions, tadchem, 2006/07/16
  - Re: My Questions, Euler Cheung, 2006/07/17
    - Re: My Questions, tadchem, 2006/07/17
elementary problem with charges and conductor, Ludo, 2006/07/15
- Re: elementary problem with charges and conductor, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/15
  - Re: elementary problem with charges and conductor, Ludo, 2006/07/15
A new book champions the importance of imagination and fantasy in mathematics, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/15
- Re: A new book champions the importance of imagination and fantasy in mathematics, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/15
  - Re: A new book champions the importance of imagination and fantasy in mathematics, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/15
Physicists get serious about invisibility shields, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/15
This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), John Baez, 2006/07/15
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/15
  - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), John Baez, 2006/07/16
    - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), Sorcerer, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), Bill Hobba, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/20
    - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), jmfbahciv, 2006/07/19
  - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), John Baez, 2006/07/17
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), Nathan Urban, 2006/07/16
  - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), John Baez, 2006/07/17
    - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), drienne6, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), John Baez, 2006/07/18
  - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), John Baez, 2006/07/18
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.4: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 2006/07/15
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.4: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 2006/07/15
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.4: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 2006/07/15
    - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.4: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/16
Newton in Space, Dirk Selis, 2006/07/14
- Re: Newton in Space, Randy Poe, 2006/07/15
- Re: Newton in Space, Jim Black, 2006/07/15
- Re: Newton in Space, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/07/15
- Re: Newton in Space, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/07/15
The force of the universe, Dirk Selis, 2006/07/14
- Re: The force of the universe, will1, 2006/07/15
Einstein and energy, Dirk Selis, 2006/07/14
- Re: Einstein and energy, will1, 2006/07/15
32381,97 Hz, Dirk Selis, 2006/07/14
- Re: 32381,97 Hz, Sue..., 2006/07/15
- Re: 32381,97 Hz, John Schutkeker, 2006/07/19
Time space, Dirk Selis, 2006/07/14
Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Douglas, 2006/07/14
- Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Archangel, 2006/07/15
- Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Douglas, 2006/07/14
  - Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Archangel, 2006/07/15
- Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Douglas, 2006/07/14
  - Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Archangel, 2006/07/15
- Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Douglas, 2006/07/14
  - Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Archangel, 2006/07/15
- Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Douglas, 2006/07/14
  - Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Archangel, 2006/07/15
Downpours Demystified?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/14
- Re: Downpours Demystified?, CWatters, 2006/07/15
  - Re: Downpours Demystified?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/15
A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 2006/07/14
- Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 2006/07/15
  - Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/15
    - Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 2006/07/15
    - Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 2006/07/15
      
      Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 2006/07/16
      
      Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 2006/07/17
      
      Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 2006/07/19
      
      Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 2006/07/20
      
      Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 2006/07/23
      
      Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 2006/07/19
Gravitational Dipole Radiation, mike3, 2006/07/14
- Re: Gravitational Dipole Radiation, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/14
  - Re: Gravitational Dipole Radiation, mike3, 2006/07/14
  - Re: Gravitational Dipole Radiation, mike3, 2006/07/14
    - Re: Gravitational Dipole Radiation, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Gravitational Dipole Radiation, mike3, 2006/07/17
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/14
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/15
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Jul 06 Washington, DC, malibu, 2006/07/15
  - Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/16
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/17
sci.physics, alt.astronomy, sci.astro.amateur, macromedia.general.brazil, Gamer, 2006/07/14
Towards frictionless nanomachines, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/14
Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, elcaminodelbudainterior, 2006/07/14
Re: How, when and where... the 5 dimensions., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/14
- Re: How, when and where... the 5 dimensions., Sam Wormley, 2006/07/14
  - Re: How, when and where... the 5 dimensions., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/14
Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/14
- Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, surrealistic-dream, 2006/07/14
  - Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, Sorcerer, 2006/07/14
    - Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, PD, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, Sorcerer, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, my mother, 2006/07/15
- Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, Bill Habr, 2006/07/14
- Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/15
Micro-pump is cool idea for future computer chips, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/14
Grasping the fourth and fifth spatial dimensions... and beyond., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/14
- Re: Grasping the fourth and fifth spatial dimensions... and beyond., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/14
  - Re: Grasping the fourth and fifth spatial dimensions... and beyond., neo, 2006/07/14
- Re: Grasping the fourth and fifth spatial dimensions... and beyond., T Wake, 2006/07/14
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, OsherD, 2006/07/14
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, donstockbauer, 2006/07/14
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/14
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, OsherD, 2006/07/15
    - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, vanep, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, OsherD, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/16
Re: Aging population causes big problems -- Let's hear your bullshi..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/13
- Re: Aging population causes big problems -- Let's hear yourbullshi..., G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/14
  - Re: Aging population causes big problems -- Let's hear yourbullshi..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/14
Horizon, BBC2, Thursday 13th of July 2006, Sorcerer, 2006/07/13
- Re: Horizon, BBC2, Thursday 13th of July 2006, Ian Parker, 2006/07/14
  - Re: Horizon, BBC2, Thursday 13th of July 2006, Sorcerer, 2006/07/14
    - Re: Horizon, BBC2, Thursday 13th of July 2006, Ian Parker, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Horizon, BBC2, Thursday 13th of July 2006, Sorcerer, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Horizon, BBC2, Thursday 13th of July 2006, Martin Hogbin, 2006/07/14
The pillars of consciousness, Doug Goncz, 2006/07/13
- Re: The pillars of consciousness, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/13
- Re: The pillars of consciousness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
- Re: The pillars of consciousness, donstockbauer, 2006/07/13
- Re: The pillars of consciousness, Doug Goncz, 2006/07/13
GRE physics prep, Lacustral, 2006/07/13
- Re: GRE physics prep, john, 2006/07/13
  - Re: GRE physics prep, john, 2006/07/13
- Re: gre physics prep, Lacustral, 2006/07/15
need help with dynamics of a spinning spacecraft, Joe Strout, 2006/07/13
- Re: need help with dynamics of a spinning spacecraft, tadchem, 2006/07/13
  - Re: need help with dynamics of a spinning spacecraft, Joe Strout, 2006/07/14
  - Re: need help with dynamics of a spinning spacecraft, puppet_sock, 2006/07/14
    - Re: need help with dynamics of a spinning spacecraft, Joe Strout, 2006/07/14
    - Re: need help with dynamics of a spinning spacecraft, tadchem, 2006/07/18
100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/13
- Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, hhc314, 2006/07/13
  - Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/13
    - Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Ken Muldrew, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Ken Muldrew, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Ken Muldrew, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Ken Muldrew, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/15
- Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, CWatters, 2006/07/13
dedanoe's irresistable proposal, dedanoe, 2006/07/13
Using an array of hair-thin electrodes implanted in his brain..., Sam Wormley, 2006/07/13
Singing to the tune of sand & Booming Sands, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/13
- Re: Singing to the tune of sand & Booming Sands, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/07/15
BULLETIN! FIRES RAGING -- Re: Time to Burn Those Evolution Textbooks ..., Ed Conrad, 2006/07/13
Conservation of Momentum, actionintegral, 2006/07/13
- Re: Conservation of Momentum, Sue..., 2006/07/13
- Re: Conservation of Momentum, PD, 2006/07/13
  - Re: Conservation of Momentum, actionintegral, 2006/07/13
    - Re: Conservation of Momentum, PD, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Conservation of Momentum, actionintegral, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Conservation of Momentum, briggs, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Conservation of Momentum, actionintegral, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Conservation of Momentum, briggs, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Conservation of Momentum, actionintegral, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Conservation of Momentum, briggs, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Conservation of Momentum, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/15
- Re: Conservation of Momentum, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/13
  - Re: Conservation of Momentum, actionintegral, 2006/07/13
- Re: Conservation of Momentum, tadchem, 2006/07/13
- Re: Conservation of Momentum, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2006/07/13
- Re: Conservation of Momentum, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/15
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/13
- Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/14
- Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/24
  - Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, T Wake, 2006/07/24
    - Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, T Wake, 2006/07/24
The White Box, virtualadepts, 2006/07/12
- Re: The White Box, donstockbauer, 2006/07/12
- Re: The White Box, T Wake, 2006/07/12
- Re: The White Box, Math Freak, 2006/07/12
- Re: The White Box, Richard Herring, 2006/07/13
  - Re: The White Box, virtualadepts, 2006/07/13
    - Re: The White Box, Richard Herring, 2006/07/14
Re: EINSTEIN'S PET THEORY, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/12
- Re: EINSTEIN'S PET THEORY, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/12
Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, cafeinst, 2006/07/12
- Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, Martin Hogbin, 2006/07/12
- Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/12
- Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, srp, 2006/07/12
  - Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, cafeinst, 2006/07/14
    - Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, Martin Hogbin, 2006/07/14
    - Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, srp, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, srp, 2006/07/16
    - Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/29
Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?, clintuk, 2006/07/12
- Re: Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?, Greg Neill, 2006/07/12
  - Re: Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?, uri, 2006/07/12
- Re: Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?, ytyourclothes, 2006/07/12
  - Re: Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?, malibu, 2006/07/13
Pascal compiler, nk., 2006/07/12
- Re: Pascal compiler, T Wake, 2006/07/12
- Pascal compiler, nk., 2006/07/12
  - Re: Pascal compiler, ddvlad, 2006/07/12
  - Re: Pascal compiler, Math Freak, 2006/07/12
EMITER's report from testin dedanoe's nerves, dedanoe, 2006/07/12
- Re: EMITER's report from testin dedanoe's nerves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/12
  - Re: EMITER's report from testin dedanoe's nerves, dedanoe, 2006/07/12
Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/12
- Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/12
  - Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, donstockbauer, 2006/07/12
    - Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Igor, 2006/07/16
- Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, T Wake, 2006/07/12
  - Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/12
- Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Igor, 2006/07/12
  - Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/07/12
  - Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Y.Porat, 2006/07/14
    - Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Igor, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Y.Porat, 2006/07/15
  - Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, PD, 2006/07/14
- Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Harry, 2006/07/14
calculating distance from the speed of sound, al, 2006/07/12
- Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, mmeron, 2006/07/12
  - Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, al, 2006/07/12
    - Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, al, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, al, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, Greg Neill, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, mmeron, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, al, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, mmeron, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, p4o2, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, p4o2, 2006/07/12
    - Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, mmeron, 2006/07/12
Basic Concepts for a Fundamental Aether Theory, mountain man, 2006/07/12
light-guiding effect in a component of teeth called dentin is due to light scattering, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/11
Need help of really smart astronomer, jmac39, 2006/07/11
- Re: Need help of really smart astronomer, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
  - Re: Need help of really smart astronomer, jmac39, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Need help of really smart astronomer, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
IR thermometer, Jeff, 2006/07/11
- Re: IR thermometer, Norm Grimpo, 2006/07/11
  - Re: IR thermometer, Jeff, 2006/07/11
    - Re: IR thermometer, Chuck Grempu, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: IR thermometer, Jeff, 2006/07/12
- Re: IR thermometer, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/12
  - Re: IR thermometer, Jeff, 2006/07/12
- Re: IR thermometer, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/12
Metamaterials for Power Storage, Jonathan, 2006/07/11
- Re: Metamaterials for Power Storage, Norm Grimpo, 2006/07/11
  - Re: Metamaterials for Power Storage, Jonathan, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Metamaterials for Power Storage, Norm Grimpo, 2006/07/11
Problems with radiation backreaction, Edward Green, 2006/07/11
- Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/12
  - Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Neil, 2006/07/12
    - Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, noshellswill, 2006/07/12
    - Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Edward Green, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Edward Green, 2006/07/30
    - Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Edward Green, 2006/07/29
(4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/11
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/11
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
  - Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
    - Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
    - Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/11
    - Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bill Snyder, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, mmeron, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, puppet_sock, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/20
      
      The number 1 is not enough to convey: X / X = 100 percent of X., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: The number 1 is not enough to convey: X / X = 100 percent of X., mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 2006/07/23
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Not_a_Number times anything equals Not_a_Number., T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Not_a_Number times anything equals Not_a_Number., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Not_a_Number times anything equals Not_a_Number., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Still to this day, an integer divide by zero aborts the application ! ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Still to this day, an integer divide by zero aborts the application ! ?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Still to this day, an integer divide by zero aborts the application ! ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Still to this day, an integer divide by zero aborts the application ! ?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/25
      
      Message not available
      Re: Still to this day, an integer divide by zero aborts the application ! ?, Sven Hesse, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Still to this day, an integer divide by zero aborts the application ! ?, mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 2006/07/25
      
      It won't be long now before integers get a NaN flag., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: It won't be long now before integers get a NaN flag., Golden Boar, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: It won't be long now before integers get a NaN flag., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
      
      Unlike Sven_Hesse, I get paid to code., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Unlike Sven_Hesse, I get paid to code., T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      I've held the same job for 13+ years., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: I've held the same job for 13+ years., T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: I've held the same job for 13+ years., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Unlike Sven_Hesse, I get paid to code., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Unlike Sven_Hesse, I get paid to code., Sven Hesse, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Unlike Sven_Hesse, I get paid to code., Bill Snyder, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: It won't be long now before integers get a NaN flag., T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: It won't be long now before integers get a NaN flag., Sven Hesse, 2006/07/25
      
      Imagine an endless array of numbers., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Imagine an endless array of numbers., T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Imagine an endless array of numbers., Sven Hesse, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Imagine an endless array of numbers., T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Imagine an endless array of numbers., mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 2006/07/25
      
      Always use doubles ( 64 bit floating point )., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Always use doubles ( 64 bit floating point )., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Always use doubles ( 64 bit floating point )., mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: It won't be long now before integers get a NaN flag., mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 2006/07/25
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Not_a_Number times anything equals Not_a_Number., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/07/30
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Ratios, MicroSoft C++ 8.0 and pure insanity., T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: The number 1 is not enough to convey: X / X = 100 percent of X., Sven Hesse, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: The number 1 is not enough to convey: X / X = 100 percent of X., T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      10 secs / 4 secs = 250 percent of 4 secs., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/23
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: The unitless number 2.5 is merely _Part_ of the story., T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: The unitless number 2.5 is merely _Part_ of the story., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, cnctut, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Y.Porat, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bill Snyder, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bill Snyder, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bill Snyder, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Greg Neill, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      The orbital speed of Sirius_A around Sirius_B., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: The orbital speed of Sirius_A around Sirius_B., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: The orbital speed of Sirius_A around Sirius_B., Art Deco, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Golden Boar, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bob Cain, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bookman, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bookman, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bookman, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bookman, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Golden Boar, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/30
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy), 2006/07/30
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, jt64, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/25
      
      ( $ 10 / $ 4 ) means: $ 10 is 250 percent of $ 4, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: ( $ 10 / $ 4 ) means: $ 10 is 250 percent of $ 4, Art Deco, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: ( $ 10 / $ 4 ) means: $ 10 is 250 percent of $ 4, Matthew Lybanon, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: ( $ 10 / $ 4 ) means: $ 10 is 250 percent of $ 4, Bill Snyder, 2006/07/29
      
      Chaecking for absurd numbers., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Sharon B, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/07/30
      
      It's not silly to divide by zero., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: It's not silly to divide by zero., Art Deco, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: It's not silly to divide by zero., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/07/30
      
      0 / 0 is Not_a_Number, 1 / 0 is +Infinity., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: 0 / 0 is Not_a_Number, 1 / 0 is +Infinity., T Wake, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: 0 / 0 is Not_a_Number, 1 / 0 is +Infinity., Randy Poe, 2006/07/31
      
      Re: It's not silly to divide by zero., T Wake, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Sharon B, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., dave hillstrom, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Sharon B, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., dave hillstrom, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Sharon B, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Aratzio, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Sharon B, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Aratzio, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., T Wake, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: ( $ 10 / $ 4 ) means: $ 10 is 250 percent of $ 4, Randy Poe, 2006/07/29
      
      Infinity is not a NaN., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: Infinity is not a NaN., T Wake, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: ( $ 10 / $ 4 ) means: $ 10 is 250 percent of $ 4, T Wake, 2006/07/30
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/23
      
      FINAL SOLUTION ALERT: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Juan Tootreego, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Juan Tootreego, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bob Cain, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, cnctut, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bookman, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      The number 1 is not enough to convey: X / X = 100 percent of X., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, John Christiansen, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/23
      
      Puddle_Duck asserts he's travelling through time ( randomly ? )., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Puddle_Duck asserts he's travelling through time ( randomly ? )., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Puddle_Duck asserts he's travelling through time ( randomly ? )., Art Deco, 2006/07/23
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Puddle_Duck asserts he's travelling through time ( randomly ? )., T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/23
      
      Message not available
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, cnctut, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bill Snyder, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Attuarii, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Attuarii, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Juan Tootreego, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, hetware, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, hetware, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Azure, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, jt64, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/27
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/27
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ? Dense B's madness spreads, Art Deco, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ? Dense B's madness spreads, jt64, 2006/07/28
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, jt64, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, briggs, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, briggs, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, jt64, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, jt64, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, mmeron, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/22
      
      VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bookman, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Attuarii, 2006/07/22
      
      Message not available
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Juan Tootreego, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/22
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, DV8, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/27
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Steph, 2006/07/29
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, DV8, 2006/07/29
      
      Message not available
      Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/31
      
      Message not available
      Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, DV8, 2006/07/31
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, DV8, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, cnctut, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, tbonepower07, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, krp, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 2006/07/13
      
      if you push him now, he'll lose control, dave hillstrom, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, CWatters, 2006/07/12
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 2006/07/12
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Teja, 2006/07/30
formula for 1/1+1/2+1/3+1/4+1/5......+1/(L-1), borje, 2006/07/11
Curriculum for easy physics course?, milwaukeeblues, 2006/07/11
- Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/07/11
- Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, Martin Hogbin, 2006/07/11
- Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/11
  - Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, Math Freak, 2006/07/11
- Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, PD, 2006/07/11
- Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/12
- Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/12
  - Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, milwaukeeblues, 2006/07/13
    - Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, PD, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/14
    - Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, Timo Nieminen, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, PD, 2006/07/14
- Bill_Nye_The_Science_Guy, Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/13
  - Re: Bill_Nye_The_Science_Guy, PD, 2006/07/13
  - Re: Bill_Nye_The_Science_Guy, T Wake, 2006/07/13
    - Re: Bill_Nye_The_Science_Guy, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Bill_Nye_The_Science_Guy, T Wake, 2006/07/13
Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 2006/07/11
- Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
- Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Igor, 2006/07/11
  - Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Rock Brentwood, 2006/07/15
    - Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Igor, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Igor, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Igor, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Edward Green, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Sorcerer, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Randy Poe, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Edward Green, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/21
      
      Message not available
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Timo Nieminen, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., mmeron, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Rock Brentwood, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., PD, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., tadchem, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 2006/07/22
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., PD, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Y.Porat, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Randy Poe, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Y.Porat, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Y.Porat, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., T Wake, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Y.Porat, 2006/07/25
      
      Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Golden Boar, 2006/07/25
with the birds i'll share this such lonely view, dedanoe, 2006/07/11
polarisation, kedar, 2006/07/11
- Re: polarisation, Sorcerer, 2006/07/11
- Re: polarisation, donstockbauer, 2006/07/11
- Re: polarisation, Martin Hogbin, 2006/07/11
- Re: polarisation, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/11
- Re: polarisation, will1, 2006/07/11
- Re: polarisation, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/12
Detecting Gravity Waves, clintuk, 2006/07/11
- Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Sue..., 2006/07/11
  - Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Art Deco, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Sue..., 2006/07/11
- Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
- Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/11
- Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Herb Martin, 2006/07/11
  - Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/14
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Tde, 2006/07/11
- "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Tde, 2006/07/11
NEW LOOK AT MAN ON THE MOON -- Astronauts or AstroNOTS?, Ed Conrad, 2006/07/11
- Re: NEW LOOK AT MAN ON THE MOON -- Astronauts or AstroNOTS?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
- Re: NEW LOOK AT MAN ON THE MOON -- Astronauts or AstroNOTS?, Mark Martin, 2006/07/11
- Re: NEW LOOK AT MAN ON THE MOON -- Astronauts or AstroNOTS?, Robert Weldon, 2006/07/11
- Re: NEW LOOK AT MAN ON THE MOON -- Astronauts or AstroNOTS?, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/11
  - Re: NEW LOOK AT MAN ON THE MOON -- Astronauts or AstroNOTS?, edconrad, 2006/07/12
Near real time California earthquake display !, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 July 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/11
- Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 July 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
Re: more curses, David DeLaney, 2006/07/10
Re: Lecture of the Week: Part VIII: Astrobiology, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/10
Re: Sanity check., Ben Newsam, 2006/07/10
- Re: Sanity check., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 2006/07/10
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Louis Boyd, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Duane C. Johnson, 2006/07/10
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, default, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Tim Williams, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Don Klipstein, 2006/07/16
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Sue..., 2006/07/10
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/10
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Norm Grimpo, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/10
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jimp, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Norm Grimpo, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/11
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, msvilans, 2006/07/10
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 2006/07/10
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jimp, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Igor, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eric R Snow, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jimp, 2006/07/11
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Mark Fortune, 2006/07/12
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/07/12
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jimp, 2006/07/10
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bill Ward, 2006/07/11
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bill Ward, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Don Klipstein, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Richard J Kinch, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bill Ward, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/07/11
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jasen, 2006/07/11
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bill Ward, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Ron Capik, 2006/07/11
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jeff, 2006/07/11
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Ian Parker, 2006/07/11
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob May, 2006/07/11
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, RHRRC, 2006/07/12
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jeff, 2006/07/12
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, RHRRC, 2006/07/12
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Tim Ward, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Joop van der Velden, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jimp, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob May, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Rich Grise, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Rich Grise, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob May, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Michael A. Terrell, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Rich Grise, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Tim Ward, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Duane C. Johnson, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jasen, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob May, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, RHRRC, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Rich Grise, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Tim Ward, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 2006/07/15
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, redbelly, 2006/07/13
- Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, webpa@xxxxxxx, 2006/07/13
  - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Duane C. Johnson, 2006/07/13
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Duane C. Johnson, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Don Klipstein, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Don Klipstein, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Greg Hansen, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie, 2006/07/13
Impossible Secrifice dedanoe!, dedanoe, 2006/07/10
Physics Today: Tributes to Hans Bethe continues, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/10
- Re: Physics Today: Tributes to Hans Bethe continues, Math Freak, 2006/07/10
Re: brain physics, uri, 2006/07/10
- Re: brain physics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
  - Re: brain physics, uri, 2006/07/10
    - Re: brain physics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
    - Re: brain physics, T Wake, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: brain physics, uri, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: brain physics, T Wake, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: brain physics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: brain physics, T Wake, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: brain physics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: brain physics, T Wake, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: brain physics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: brain physics, uri, 2006/07/11
Re: AMERICA IN DANGER: Secret Torture Rooms, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
- Re: AMERICA IN DANGER: Secret Torture Rooms, T Wake, 2006/07/10
how does orbits work?, punkbuster, 2006/07/10
- Re: how does orbits work?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
- Re: how does orbits work?, OG, 2006/07/10
- Re: how does orbits work?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/10
- Re: how does orbits work?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/10
- Re: how does orbits work?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2006/07/10
  - All orbits are either falling-in or escaping., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/13
- Re: how does orbits work?, boson boss, 2006/07/10
- Re: how does orbits work?, punkbuster, 2006/07/11
  - Re: how does orbits work?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/11
  - Re: how does orbits work?, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/11
    - Re: how does orbits work?, Sorcerer, 2006/07/11
  - Re: how does orbits work?, boson boss, 2006/07/11
    - Re: how does orbits work?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: how does orbits work?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/14
Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, malibu, 2006/07/10
- Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, Igor, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, Tony, 2006/07/10
    - Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, mmeron, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, mmeron, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, mmeron, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, malibu, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, mmeron, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, Edward Green, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, mmeron, 2006/07/12
- Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, tadchem, 2006/07/13
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Tde, 2006/07/10
- "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Eht, 2006/07/29
- "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Eht, 2006/07/29
universe, JoeT, 2006/07/10
- Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/10
- Re: universe, Igor, 2006/07/10
  - Re: universe, JoeT, 2006/07/10
    - Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/10
    - Re: universe, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
    - Re: universe, mmeron, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/14
    - Re: universe, PD, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: universe, Sorcerer, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: universe, JoeT, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: universe, Sorcerer, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: universe, PD, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: universe, JoeT, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: universe, PD, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: universe, JoeT, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: universe, Igor, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: universe, JoeT, 2006/07/12
EMITER is testing dedanoe, dedanoe, 2006/07/10
- Re: EMITER is testing dedanoe, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/10
- Re: EMITER is testing dedanoe, CWatters, 2006/07/10
- Re: EMITER is testing dedanoe, Paul Cardinale, 2006/07/10
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 10, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2006/07/10
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.2 Quantum Gravity: Non-Markovian Memory, OsherD, 2006/07/10
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.2 Quantum Gravity: Non-Markovian Memory, OsherD, 2006/07/10
Is there a co ordinate system that is based on Plancks constant?, Nick, 2006/07/10
- Re: Is there a co ordinate system that is based on Plancks constant?, tadchem, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Is there a co ordinate system that is based on Plancks constant?, Aage Andersen, 2006/07/10
    - Re: Is there a co ordinate system that is based on Plancks constant?, tadchem, 2006/07/12
    - Re: Is there a co ordinate system that is based on Plancks constant?, tadchem, 2006/07/12
- Re: Is there a co ordinate system that is based on Plancks constant?, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/12
Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/10
- Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., Norm Grimpo, 2006/07/10
- Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., tadchem, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., BernardZ, 2006/07/10
    - Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., bernardz, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., Bill Snyder, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., tadchem, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/23
      
      Message not available
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/25
      
      Message not available
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 2006/07/14
Megatechnology is the ultimate cure, Bret Cahill, 2006/07/10
Why there must be matters (3), Linda, 2006/07/10
- Re: Why there must be matters (3), Sue..., 2006/07/10
  - Re: Why there must be matters (3), Cranks Reply, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Why there must be matters (3), G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/10
Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, Sue..., 2006/07/10
- Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/10
- Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, Fabrizio J Bonsignore, 2006/07/12
  - Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, Sue..., 2006/07/12
- Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, Robert Kolker, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, Math Freak, 2006/07/10
BONES OF CONTENTION, Ed Conrad, 2006/07/09
- Re: BONES OF CONTENTION, Cleverbum, 2006/07/10
- Re: BONES OF CONTENTION, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/10
- Re: BONES OF CONTENTION, AmerGovtCriminalsExposers, 2006/07/10
- Re: BONES OF CONTENTION, AmerGovtPervertsExposer, 2006/07/10
An idea on the arrow of time, Daniel Dickinson, 2006/07/09
- Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/09
- Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/09
  - Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 2006/07/09
    - Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Edward Green, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Edward Green, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 2006/07/16
    - Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Mike, 2006/07/16
  - Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Daniel Dickinson, 2006/07/09
  - Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Mike, 2006/07/16
- Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Mike, 2006/07/16
- Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Edward Green, 2006/07/16
  - Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 2006/07/16
    - Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Edward Green, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 2006/07/16
rubber on plastic static friction coefficient, Mike, 2006/07/09
- Re: rubber on plastic static friction coefficient, cnctut, 2006/07/09
  - Re: rubber on plastic static friction coefficient, Mike, 2006/07/09
    - Re: rubber on plastic static friction coefficient, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/10
    - Re: rubber on plastic static friction coefficient, John C . Polasek, 2006/07/10
Re: Einstein said: Time is what the clock measure., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/09
- Re: Einstein said: Time is what the clock measure., Ben Newsam, 2006/07/10
- Re: Einstein said: Time is what the clock measure., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/12
- Re: Einstein said: Time is what the clock measure., Ben Newsam, 2006/07/15
- Re: Einstein said: Time is what the clock measure., Ben Newsam, 2006/07/25
E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
- Re: E = W = F = mass, Greg Neill, 2006/07/09
  - Message not available
    - Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/09
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Randy Poe, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Greg Neill, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, John Christiansen, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, John Christiansen, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, John Christiansen, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Greg Neill, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Greg Neill, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Randy Poe, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/10
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, briggs, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Greg Neill, 2006/07/09
  - Message not available
    - Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/09
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 2006/07/09
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/10
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 2006/07/09
- Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
  - Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 2006/07/09
- Re: E = W = F = mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/09
- Re: E = W = F = mass, PD, 2006/07/12
- Re: E = W = F = mass, PD, 2006/07/12
Re: Incremental increases in gravity., Sam Wormley, 2006/07/09
- Re: Incremental increases in gravity., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/09
- Re: Incremental increases in gravity., cnctut, 2006/07/09
  - Re: Incremental increases in gravity., malibu, 2006/07/10
- Re: Incremental increases in gravity., puppet_sock, 2006/07/11
  - Today's Global warming is a counter-trend., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/13
    - Re: Today's Global warming is a counter-trend., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/13
    - Re: Today's Global warming is a counter-trend., T Wake, 2006/07/13
"The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Lij, 2006/07/09
Re: Power bikes could end transport problem- cost 2 cents a mile, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/09
Einstein's Thoughts on Science and Religion., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/09
- Re: Einstein's Thoughts on Science and Religion., T Wake, 2006/07/09
- Re: Einstein's Thoughts on Science and Religion., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/09
- Re: Einstein's Thoughts on Science and Religion., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/09
  - Re: Einstein's Thoughts on Science and Religion., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/10
- Jeff Relf - Famous Cretin, dda1, 2006/07/09
Re: Electrical potency of a brain under different conditions?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/09
ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING -- Better Late Than Never ,,,, Ed Conrad, 2006/07/09
Re: A CLEANER, CHEAPER ROUTE TO TITANIUM, jimp, 2006/07/09
- Re: A CLEANER, CHEAPER ROUTE TO TITANIUM, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/07/09
- Re: A CLEANER, CHEAPER ROUTE TO TITANIUM, Octa Ex, 2006/07/10
ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, Ed Conrad, 2006/07/09
- Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, Sirius Howard, 2006/07/09
  - Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, edconrad, 2006/07/09
- Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, Infidel, 2006/07/09
  - Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, edconrad, 2006/07/09
- Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, LidsvilleNine, 2006/07/09
- Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, Annie . Orange, 2006/07/09
  - Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, edconrad, 2006/07/09
  - Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, edconrad, 2006/07/09
- Message not available
  - Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, The Real Chris, 2006/07/12
Re: Telescope can see moon from 30 light years, T Wake, 2006/07/08
- Re: Telescope can see moon from 30 light years, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/08
  - Re: Telescope can see moon from 30 light years, T Wake, 2006/07/08
Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/08
- Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 2006/07/08
- Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bill Hobba, 2006/07/08
- Re: Magnetic Idyll, Tom Roberts, 2006/07/09
  - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/09
    - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Tom Roberts, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Igor, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, mmeron, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, mmeron, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Daryl McCullough, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, mmeron, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Daryl McCullough, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, mmeron, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/12
  - Message not available
    - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Tom Roberts, 2006/07/09
- Re: Magnetic Idyll, Igor, 2006/07/09
- Re: Magnetic Idyll, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/09
  - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/09
    - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bill Hobba, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bill Hobba, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 2006/07/12
  - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 2006/07/10
    - Re: Magnetic Idyll, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 2006/07/10
    - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Timo Nieminen, 2006/07/10
- Re: Magnetic Idyll, Igor, 2006/07/09
  - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Tom Roberts, 2006/07/09
    - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Igor, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, dda1, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bill Hobba, 2006/07/10
- Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 2006/07/09
  - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/10
    - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sorcerer, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, tendon, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, my mother, 2006/07/13
- Re: Magnetic Idyll, Daryl McCullough, 2006/07/11
  - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/13
    - Re: Magnetic Idyll, PD, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Timo Nieminen, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, PD, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 2006/07/22
    - Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 2006/07/15
Global Field Time vs In-Line Time, G. L. Bradford, 2006/07/08
NEWTON WAS WRONG, ACE, 2006/07/08
- Re: NEWTON WAS WRONG, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/08
- NEWTON WAS WRONG, ACE, 2006/07/08
"The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Moc, 2006/07/08
another 1 of 1 from dedanoe, dedanoe, 2006/07/08
A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, polaris431, 2006/07/08
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2006/07/08
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, joeyneutrino, 2006/07/08
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Martin Hogbin, 2006/07/08
  - Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/08
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/08
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, jimp, 2006/07/08
  - Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Martin Hogbin, 2006/07/08
    - Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brad Guth, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brad Guth, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brad Guth, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brad Guth, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/13
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/08
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/14
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brad Guth, 2006/07/16
  - Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/16
  - Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/17
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, edconrad, 2006/07/21
  - Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/21
why it is cold in cave?, j . mazak, 2006/07/08
- Re: why it is cold in cave?, Igor, 2006/07/08
- Re: why it is cold in cave?, tadchem, 2006/07/08
- Re: why it is cold in cave?, Edward Green, 2006/07/08
Muzzle Brake Or ? At End Of Large Gun Barrel, Robert11, 2006/07/08
- Re: Muzzle Brake Or ? At End Of Large Gun Barrel, lubarsky, 2006/07/08
- Re: Muzzle Brake Or ? At End Of Large Gun Barrel, jimp, 2006/07/08
- Re: Muzzle Brake Or ? At End Of Large Gun Barrel, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/08
Bending a Soccer Ball, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/08
Extinction gets synchronized, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/08
Optics of door security viewer, Jane, 2006/07/08
- Re: Optics of door security viewer, 2, 2006/07/08
  - Message not available
    - Re: Optics of door security viewer, John C . Polasek, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Optics of door security viewer, 2, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Optics of door security viewer, Jeff, 2006/07/10
- Re: Optics of door security viewer, tadchem, 2006/07/08
  - Re: Optics of door security viewer, John C . Polasek, 2006/07/09
Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., Max Keon, 2006/07/08
Why there must be matter? (2), Linda, 2006/07/08
- Re: Why there must be matter? (2), Sue..., 2006/07/08
  - Re: Why there must be matter? (2), Linda, 2006/07/08
    - Re: Why there must be matter? (2), Sue..., 2006/07/08
Re: GRAVITATION, kirov, 2006/07/08
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, Bill_Vajk, 2006/07/08
Re: Swing and momentum, Bill_Vajk, 2006/07/08
- Re: Swing and momentum, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/08
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.2 Quantum Gravity: What is Geometric vs (Probable) Causal Depends on Phase, OsherD, 2006/07/08
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.2 Quantum Gravity: What is Geometric vs (Probable) Causal Depends on Phase, OsherD, 2006/07/08
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.2 Quantum Gravity: What is Geometric vs (Probable) Causal Depends on Phase, Norm Grimpo, 2006/07/08
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.2 Quantum Gravity: What is Geometric vs (Probable) Causal Depends on Phase, Norm Grimpo, 2006/07/08
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.1: Quantum Gravity Via Dark Energy and Dark Matter Models, OsherD, 2006/07/07
OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/07
- Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/07
  - Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/07
    - Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/08
- Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, jimp, 2006/07/07
  - Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/10
Two-slit experiment, nightlight, 2006/07/07
- Re: Two-slit experiment, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/08
- Re: Two-slit experiment, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/08
  - Re: Two-slit experiment, Sue..., 2006/07/08
Natural bodies-surface vs.internal interactions?, kumar, 2006/07/07
- Re: Natural bodies-surface vs.internal interactions?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Natural bodies-surface vs.internal interactions?, kumar, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Natural bodies-surface vs.internal interactions?, Marvin, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Natural bodies-surface vs.internal interactions?, kumar, 2006/07/09
(Why does Spaceman keep coming and going?) Expanding Universe, Cam Jones, 2006/07/07
- Re: (Why does Spaceman keep coming and going?) Expanding Universe, T Wake, 2006/07/07
  - Re: (Why does Spaceman keep coming and going?) Expanding Universe, Cam Jones, 2006/07/07
    - Re: (Why does Spaceman keep coming and going?) Expanding Universe, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/07
    - Re: (Why does Spaceman keep coming and going?) Expanding Universe, T Wake, 2006/07/07
still wrestling Re: gravity a fictional force in Atom Totality Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, a_plutonium, 2006/07/07
- an easy way out-- charge is mass and bends space around it Re: still wrestling Re: gravity a fictional force in Atom Totality, a_plutonium, 2006/07/16
  - Re: an easy way out-- charge is mass and bends space around it Re: still wrestling Re: gravity a fictional force in Atom Totality, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/16
  - mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, a_plutonium, 2006/07/17
    - Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, a_plutonium, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, boson boss, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, a_plutonium, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, boson boss, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, a_plutonium, 2006/07/18
      
      10^120 to tile Universe & gravity 10^40 Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force, a_plutonium, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: 10^120 to tile Universe & gravity 10^40 Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 2006/07/19
      
      entropy is a subset of Ampere-Maxwell law Re: 10^120 to tile Universe & gravity 10^40, a_plutonium, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: entropy is a subset of Ampere-Maxwell law Re: 10^120 to tile Universe & gravity 10^40, QncyMI, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: entropy is a subset of Ampere-Maxwell law Re: 10^120 to tile Universe & gravity 10^40, QncyMI, 2006/07/29
      
      Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, MadDogR75, 2006/07/20
Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, DWIII, 2006/07/07
- Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, mmeron, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, DWIII, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, mmeron, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/10
    - Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Sylvain Croussette, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, DWIII, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, mmeron, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, mmeron, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, mmeron, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/09
- Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/07
- Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, ABarlow, 2006/07/08
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 784 July 7, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/07
- Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 784 July 7, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, malibu, 2006/07/07
  - Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 784 July 7, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/07
    - Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 784 July 7, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, malibu, 2006/07/07
"Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations 3", Lij, 2006/07/07
Only a Test -- DO NOT READ (And THAT Means YOUI}}, Ed Conrad, 2006/07/07
- Re: Only a Test -- DO NOT READ (And THAT Means YOUI}}, donstockbauer, 2006/07/08
14 million year fly found conserved in plastic spray, Dino Saurus, 2006/07/07
- Re: 14 million year fly found conserved in plastic spray, donstockbauer, 2006/07/08
Re: Using lift to increase speeds, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/07
Re: Electric force and charge, franklinhu, 2006/07/07
- Re: Electric force and charge, JoeT, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Electric force and charge, franklinhu, 2006/07/08
    - Re: Electric force and charge, JoeT, 2006/07/08
  - Re: Electric force and charge, Jim Black, 2006/07/08
    - Re: Electric force and charge, JoeT, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Electric force and charge, Jim Black, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Electric force and charge, JoeT, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Electric force and charge, Jim Black, 2006/07/10
- Re: Electric force and charge, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/09
Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, franklinhu, 2006/07/07
- Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, mountain man, 2006/07/07
- Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Eric Gisse, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, malibu, 2006/07/07
- Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/07
- Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, PD, 2006/07/07
- Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, tadchem, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, mountain man, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, tdp1001, 2006/07/17
- Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Y.Porat, 2006/07/08
- Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, CWatters, 2006/07/08
  - Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Sue..., 2006/07/08
  - Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, franklinhu, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, PD, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, PD, 2006/07/11
    - Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, T Wake, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, uri, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, PerfectlyAble, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/11
- Modeling the universe as a white hole., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/09
  - Re: Modeling the universe as a white hole., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/09
  - Re: Modeling the universe as a white hole., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/09
    - Re: Modeling the universe as a white hole., Art Deco, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Modeling the universe as a white hole., T Wake, 2006/07/10
- Re: Physics wrong turns, cnctut, 2006/07/11
Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, h_v_ansari, 2006/07/07
- Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, T Wake, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, T Wake, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/07/09
- Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, Salmon Egg, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, T Wake, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, PD, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, lucasea, 2006/07/07
- Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, PD, 2006/07/07
- Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, h_v_ansari, 2006/07/30
Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, h_v_ansari, 2006/07/07
- Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/07
- Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, Straydog, 2006/07/07
- Virus alert- Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Virus alert- Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/07
- Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/07/08
  - Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/07/08
- Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, h_v_ansari, 2006/07/19
  - Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, PD, 2006/07/19
Electromagnetic theory without relativity, h_v_ansari, 2006/07/07
- New Cretin Alert : Hamid Ansari, dda1, 2006/07/07
- Re: Electromagnetic theory without relativity, T Wake, 2006/07/07
- Re: Thinking wihout a brain, Igor, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Thinking wihout a brain, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/07/07
- Electromagnetic theory without Relativity, h_v_ansari, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Electromagnetic theory without Relativity, Igor, 2006/07/17
  - AVOID THIS PIECE OF SHIT, IT POINTS TO A VIRUS., dda1, 2006/07/17
  - Re: Electromagnetic theory without Relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/07/17
    - Re: Electromagnetic theory without Relativity, dda1, 2006/07/18
Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, Linda, 2006/07/07
- Re: Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, jimp, 2006/07/07
- Re: Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, malibu, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, malibu, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, malibu, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, malibu, 2006/07/07
Re: Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone, Art Deco, 2006/07/06
That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Math Freak, 2006/07/06
- Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/06
  - Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Math Freak, 2006/07/06
    - Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/07
- Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Bob Cain, 2006/07/08
  - Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Math Freak, 2006/07/08
  - Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Ogler_Bob, 2006/07/09
  - Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Gary Sokolich, 2006/07/10
  - Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Bob Cain, 2006/07/10
- Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Rock Brentwood, 2006/07/15
  - Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Greg Neill, 2006/07/15
Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2006/07/06
- Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/06
- Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/06
- Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, T Wake, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light But not in micro, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light But not in micro, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light But not in micro, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light But not in micro, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light But not in micro, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light But not in micro, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/10
  - Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, T Wake, 2006/07/08
A Stellar Pair of Shades, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/06
Electric field strength, mark, 2006/07/06
- Re: Electric field strength, Randy Poe, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Electric field strength, mark, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Electric field strength, Jim Black, 2006/07/07
- Re: Electric field strength, Norm Grimpo, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Electric field strength, Jim Black, 2006/07/07
johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, johnlawrencereedjr, 2006/07/06
- Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/07/06
  - Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, Math Freak, 2006/07/06
    - Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, Math Freak, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, Math Freak, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, Math Freak, 2006/07/08
  - Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, johnlawrencereedjr, 2006/07/11
    - Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, johnlawrencereedjr, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, johnlawrencereedjr, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
Australian solar reflector project, mrdarrett, 2006/07/06
- Re: Australian solar reflector project, mrdarrett, 2006/07/06
more newtonian crap, malibu, 2006/07/06
- Re: more newtonian crap, malibu, 2006/07/07
  - Re: more newtonian crap, John C . Polasek, 2006/07/07
    - Re: more newtonian crap, malibu, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: more newtonian crap, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: more newtonian crap, malibu, 2006/07/07
- Re: more newtonian crap, Sorcerer, 2006/07/07
simple "either or" situation, dedanoe, 2006/07/06
Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/06
- Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, T Wake, 2006/07/06
Where is the flaw?, cafeinst, 2006/07/06
- Re: Where is the flaw?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/07/06
- Re: Where is the flaw?, Richard Herring, 2006/07/06
- Re: Where is the flaw?, T Wake, 2006/07/06
- Re: Where is the flaw?, Jim Black, 2006/07/07
  - Re: Where is the flaw?, Jim Black, 2006/07/07
Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., jollyrogership, 2006/07/06
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., William Blake Jr., 2006/07/06
    - Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/06
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! The Mother er Kook is Back!of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., dda1, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! The Mother er Kook is Back!of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., Bill Hobba, 2006/07/06
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., Paul Cardinale, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., Sorcerer, 2006/07/06
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., Immortalist, 2006/07/07
Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!!, drelliot, 2006/07/06
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!!, T Wake, 2006/07/06
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! - The ing Troll is Back, dda1, 2006/07/06
"Corrections to Special Relativity 3", Lij, 2006/07/06
Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, Cleverbum, 2006/07/06
- Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, Matthew Lybanon, 2006/07/06
- Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, redbelly98, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, Cleverbum, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, ABarlow, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, Cleverbum, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, ABarlow, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, Cleverbum, 2006/07/10
SI density can be defined as X number of cesium maser oscilations., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/06
- Re: SI density can be defined as X number of cesium maser oscilations., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/06
  - Re: SI density can be defined as X number of cesium maser oscilations., Kadaitcha Man, 2006/07/06
- Re: SI density can be defined as X number of cesium maser oscilations., T Wake, 2006/07/06
force vs power, Matifx, 2006/07/06
- Re: force vs power, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/06
  - Re: force vs power, Matifx, 2006/07/06
- Re: force vs power, Dr Photon, 2006/07/06
  - Re: force vs power, Matifx, 2006/07/06
    - Re: force vs power, Dr Photon, 2006/07/06
    - Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: force vs power, Matifx, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: force vs power, Matifx, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 2006/07/08
      
      Message not available
      Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: force vs power, Matifx, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: force vs power, Mike, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: force vs power, Mike, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: force vs power, Mike, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: force vs power, Matifx, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: force vs power, Matifx, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: force vs power, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: force vs power, joe_avery_2005, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: force vs power, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/22
- Re: force vs power, joe_avery_2005, 2006/07/07
  - Re: force vs power, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/07
    - Re: force vs power, joe_avery_2005, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: force vs power, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: force vs power, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: force vs power, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: force vs power, Matifx, 2006/07/08
- Re: force vs power, srp, 2006/07/11
  - Re: force vs power, Matifx, 2006/07/11
    - Re: force vs power, srp, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: force vs power, Matifx, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: force vs power, joe_avery_2005, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: force vs power, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: force vs power, joe_avery_2005, 2006/07/14
  - Re: force vs power, John C . Polasek, 2006/07/11
    - Re: force vs power, srp, 2006/07/11
solar chimney, Jeff, 2006/07/05
- Re: solar chimney, mrdarrett, 2006/07/06
  - Re: solar chimney, mrdarrett, 2006/07/06
Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/05
- Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, T Wake, 2006/07/05
- Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/05
  - Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, T Wake, 2006/07/05
    - Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, T Wake, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/05
- Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, Eeyore, 2006/07/05
  - Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/05
Re: "The Paradox of Zeno", Ben Newsam, 2006/07/05
Re: Why sending a signal, or travel, back in time can't be done, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/05
Re: Physics is dead!, Paul B. Andersen, 2006/07/05
- Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/05
  - Re: Physics is dead!, Eric Gisse, 2006/07/05
- Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/06
    - Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/08
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, T Wake, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/22
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/25
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/28
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/27
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Physics is dead!, mmeron, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henry Haapalainen, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henry Haapalainen, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/07/16
Will this work for back-of-the-envelope thermal diffusion?, Paul Ciszek, 2006/07/05
- Re: Will this work for back-of-the-envelope thermal diffusion?, Paul Ciszek, 2006/07/05
- Re: Will this work for back-of-the-envelope thermal diffusion?, mmeron, 2006/07/05
OT: Rewired for Consciousness?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/05
fissionable isotopes?, mrdarrett, 2006/07/05
- Re: fissionable isotopes?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/05
  - Re: fissionable isotopes?, mrdarrett, 2006/07/05
- Re: fissionable isotopes?, mmeron, 2006/07/05
  - Re: fissionable isotopes?, mrdarrett, 2006/07/05
    - Re: fissionable isotopes?, mmeron, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: fissionable isotopes?, Timo Nieminen, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: fissionable isotopes?, mmeron, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: fissionable isotopes?, Ken Muldrew, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: fissionable isotopes?, mmeron, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: fissionable isotopes?, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/06
"Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity? 3", Lij, 2006/07/05
Re: Is there a relationship between optical band gap and activation energy?, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/05
www.bilisselbilimler.forumu.com, ege_satranc, 2006/07/05
- Re: www.rotten.com, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/05
ICBM Trajectories ?, Robert11, 2006/07/05
- Re: ICBM Trajectories ?, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/05
- Re: ICBM Trajectories ?, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/05
  - Re: ICBM Trajectories ?, Norm Grimpo, 2006/07/05
- Re: ICBM Trajectories ?, John C . Polasek, 2006/07/05
- Re: ICBM Trajectories ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/05
- Re: ICBM Trajectories ?, Randy Poe, 2006/07/05
  - Re: ICBM Trajectories ?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2006/07/05
cosmic microwave background, JoeT, 2006/07/05
- Re: cosmic microwave background, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/05
Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/05
- Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/05
  - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/05
    - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/06
- Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Randy Poe, 2006/07/05
  - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/05
    - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Randy Poe, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Randy Poe, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Randy Poe, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Ken Muldrew, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Ken Muldrew, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Ken Muldrew, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/08
    - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/06
- Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/05
  - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, blair . houghton, 2006/07/06
- Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, PD, 2006/07/05
  - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/06
    - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, PD, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/08
- Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/05
- Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Randy Poe, 2006/07/06
    - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/06
    - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/08
- Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/11
  - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/13
    - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jimp, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Randy Poe, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/23
      
      Message not available
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/25
      
      Message not available
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Andy Resnick, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/28
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/23
      
      Message not available
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jimp, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Bill Snyder, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Henning Makholm, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/20
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/21
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jimp, 2006/07/18
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jimp, 2006/07/19
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/22
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jimp, 2006/07/23
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/24
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/27
      
      Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/27
  - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 2006/07/27
    - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/27
    - Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 2006/07/27
Light and wave, malay, 2006/07/05
- Re: Light and wave, Wiallim, 2006/07/05
  - Re: Light and wave, malay, 2006/07/05
    - Re: Light and wave, PD, 2006/07/06
- Re: Light and wave, Igor, 2006/07/05
- Re: Light and wave, Sorcerer, 2006/07/07
Factoring idea, problems with math community, jstevh, 2006/07/05
- Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Znod Grimpo, 2006/07/05
- Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, jstevh, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Norm Grimpo, 2006/07/06
- Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Eric Gisse, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Y.Porat, 2006/07/06
    - Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Cranks Reply, 2006/07/06
    - Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Eric Gisse, 2006/07/06
  - Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, jstevh, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Eric Gisse, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, T Wake, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Eric Gisse, 2006/07/07
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 781 June 19, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, enigma . valdez, 2006/07/04
Imaginary Weapons - a book by Sharon Weinberger, Jack Sarfatti, 2006/07/04
- Re: Imaginary Weapons - a book by Sharon Weinberger, donstockbauer, 2006/07/04
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83: Quantum Gravity First Riccati PI Equation, OsherD, 2006/07/04
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83: Quantum Gravity First Riccati PI Equation, Znod Grimpo, 2006/07/04
Re: Ping Don Findlay's strike game players, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/04
Re: Bad Astronomy review of "Superman Returns", Ben Newsam, 2006/07/04
- Re: Bad Astronomy review of "Superman Returns", Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/04
Re: RELATIVITY HYPNOTISTS WISH TO KNOW IF EINSTEIN WAS WRONG, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/04
The Achilles Heel of String Theory., S D Rodrian, 2006/07/04
- Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., dan.echegoyen@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/07/05
  - Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., Odysseus, 2006/07/06
- Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/05
  - Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., sdr, 2006/07/06
    - Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., kunzmilan, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/07/10
- Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., sdrodrian, 2006/07/05
- Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., sdrodrian, 2006/07/06
- Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., sdrodrian, 2006/07/14
- Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., sdrodrian, 2006/07/18
I am confused with Magnetic theory, Sanny, 2006/07/04
- Re: I am confused with Magnetic theory, Sue..., 2006/07/04
- Re: I am confused with Magnetic theory, FrediFizzx, 2006/07/04
- Re: I am confused with Magnetic theory, The Real Chris, 2006/07/04
- Re: I am confused with Magnetic theory, Martin Hogbin, 2006/07/06
new animation, malibu, 2006/07/04
Odd nuclear technologies?, Greg Hansen, 2006/07/04
about electric potential, Ludo, 2006/07/04
- Re: about electric potential, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/04
- Re: about electric potential, J. Horta, 2006/07/04
  - Re: about electric potential, Ludo, 2006/07/04
"Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Lij, 2006/07/04
- Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", J. Horta, 2006/07/04
Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/04
- Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/04
- Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/04
  - Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/06
- Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/04
  - Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/04
    - Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/04
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/04
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, hhc314, 2006/07/04
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, hhc314, 2006/07/04
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/04
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Benod The Numerous, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Benod The Numerous, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, briggs, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/06
    - Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/04
- Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, srp, 2006/07/04
  - Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
    - Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, srp, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, srp, 2006/07/05
- Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, hhc314, 2006/07/04
  - Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
    - Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, srp, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, srp, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, srp, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, briggs, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
    - Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, hhc314, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, srp, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, hhc314, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, hhc314, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Greg Neill, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Eric Gisse, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Eric Gisse, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/09
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Y.Porat, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, T Wake, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, T Wake, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/13
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Message not available
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, T Wake, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, jmfbahciv, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo Nieminen, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/12
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/07/11
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/08
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 2006/07/09
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/10
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, briggs, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/07
    - Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 2006/07/06
- Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, operator jay, 2006/07/06
Dedanoe's little explosive device, dedanoe, 2006/07/04
- Re: Dedanoe's little explosive device, donstockbauer, 2006/07/04
- Re: Dedanoe's little explosive device, hhc314, 2006/07/05
  - Re: Dedanoe's little explosive device, dedanoe, 2006/07/06
The Expanding Universe, lukendog, 2006/07/04
- Re: The Expanding Universe, donstockbauer, 2006/07/04
- Re: The Expanding Universe, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/04
  - Re: The Expanding Universe, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/04
    - Re: The Expanding Universe, lukendog, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: The Expanding Universe, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: The Expanding Universe, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/05
- Patinha_Minha has moved in with me again., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/15
  - Re: Patinha_Minha has moved in with me again., T Wake, 2006/07/15
    - I've never had one good word to say about drugs., Jeff…Relf, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: I've never had one good word to say about drugs., T Wake, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: I've never had one good word to say about drugs., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/16
  - Re: Patinha_Minha has moved in with me again., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/15
    - Re: Patinha_Minha has moved in with me again., T Wake, 2006/07/15
Re: Kadiatcha_Girrl... What happened to your bots ?, Crank Hunter, 2006/07/04
Re: Jodrell bank - 3d space movie, donstockbauer, 2006/07/03
Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Jack Sarfatti, 2006/07/03
- Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/04
  - Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Crank Hunter, 2006/07/04
    - Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/04
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Art Deco, 2006/07/04
  - Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Sue..., 2006/07/04
- Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/04
  - Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/04
    - Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/04
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, panteltje, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Jan Panteltje, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Richard Herring, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Gman, 2006/07/05
  - Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Richard Herring, 2006/07/04
    - Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/04
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/04
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Richard Herring, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Richard Herring, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Richard Herring, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/05
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Richard Herring, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Jack Dominey, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/06
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Jack Dominey, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 2006/07/07
      
      Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/05
Re: Star Distances, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/03
- Re: Star Distances, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/04
  - Re: Star Distances, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/04
    - Re: Star Distances, Ben Newsam, 2006/07/04
      
      Re: Star Distances, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/04
  - Re: Re: Star Distances, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/07/04
- Re: Star Distances, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/14
  - Re: Star Distances, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/07/15
Archimedes Plutonium & The Secret Of Kabbalah, CoreyWhite, 2006/07/03
- Re: Archimedes Plutonium & The Secret Of Kabbalah, will1, 2006/07/03
"The Matter of "Dark Matter 3", Lij, 2006/07/03
Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, June 2006, Y.Porat, 2006/07/03
- Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, June 2006, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/03
  - Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, June 2006, Y.Porat, 2006/07/04
    - Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, June 2006, Crank Hunter, 2006/07/04
- Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, June 2006, T Wake, 2006/07/03
Re: Particle physics book (undergraduate/graduate level)?, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 2006/07/03
i said i have functional over unity pmobile, dedanoe, 2006/07/03
- Re: i said i have functional over unity pmobile, Jim Black, 2006/07/04
  - Re: i said i have functional over unity pmobile, dedanoe, 2006/07/04
A FORCE IS UNNECESSARY FOR ORBITAL MOTION, ACE, 2006/07/03
- Re: A FORCE IS UNNECESSARY FOR ORBITAL MOTION, Rock Brentwood, 2006/07/06
AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, guskz, 2006/07/03
- Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, Sam Wormley, 2006/07/03
  - Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/03
    - Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, T Wake, 2006/07/03
      
      Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/03
      
      Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, T Wake, 2006/07/03
      
      Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/07/03
      
      Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, T Wake, 2006/07/03
- Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, tadchem, 2006/07/03
- Re: AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/07/04
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 03, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2006/07/03
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Ben Newsam, 2006/07/03
- Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 2006/07/09
- Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 2006/07/09
- Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/07/13
  - Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 2006/07/13
    - Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 2006/07/14
    - Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 2006/07/14
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 2006/07/15
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 2006/07/16
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Cranks Reply, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 2006/07/17
      
      Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 2006/07/17