sci.physics (date)

sci.physics (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

July 31, 2006

Re: Free body diagram, boanerges35, 15:58
Re: Free body diagram, boanerges35, 15:52
Trickle Down Mass Effect looks like missing mass., malibu, 15:49
Re: Why tethered electrons?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 15:43
Re: Jamming the human senses, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:43
Re: Free body diagram, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:39
Re: Free body diagram, Andy Resnick, 15:33
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 15:25
Re: Free body diagram, boanerges35, 15:15
Re: Free body diagram, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:13
Re: Free body diagram, boanerges35, 15:08
Re: Free body diagram, boanerges35, 15:02
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 15:02
Re: Jamming the human senses, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:01
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 14:18
Re: selfishness, T Wake, 14:10
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Steve Willner, 14:05
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 786 July 25, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, mmeron, 14:02
Re: Free body diagram, edprochak, 13:42
Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Michael Stemper, 13:35
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Jeff Root, 13:19
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, edprochak, 13:12
Re: The Bullet Puzzle, Edward Green, 13:06
Re: Temperature and Pressure at atomic level?, mmeron, 13:03
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 786 July 25, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Bruce Scott TOK, 12:58
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 12:56
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Ken S. Tucker, 12:53
Re: String Theory question, Jan Panteltje, 12:53
Free body diagram, boanerges35, 12:47
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Traveler, 12:44
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Jeff Root, 12:41
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Jeff Root, 12:37
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Jeff Root, 12:31
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ian Parker, 12:26
Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 12:16
Re: Why tethered electrons?, Mark L. Fergerson, 12:00
Re: Jim Smithson aka (dda1), INTERNET FASCIST, dda1, 11:57
Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?, Igor, 11:52
Re: selfishness, uri, 11:47
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, T Wake, 11:45
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 11:42
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:40
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Traveler, 11:39
Re: Question about sci-fi physics, Mark L. Fergerson, 11:39
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, bryanjugglercryptographer, 11:26
Re: The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, Spoonfed, 11:22
Re: String Theory question, Golden Boar, 11:22
Re: Patinha's Stash_Socket, Tampon_Socket, Bearded_Taco, Meat_Wallet., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:14
Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:13
Jim Smithson aka (dda1), INTERNET FASCIST, David Thomson, 10:58
Schoenfeld, CRETIN, dda1, 10:50
Re: String Theory question, Jan Panteltje, 10:44
Re: Jamming the human senses, Andy Resnick, 10:32
Re: 0 / 0 is Not_a_Number, 1 / 0 is +Infinity., Randy Poe, 10:21
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 10:15
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Sam Wormley, 10:10
Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 10:04
Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 10:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 10:00
Re: Who Killed the Electric Car? Film Review, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:53
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, surrealistic-dream, 09:49
Re: Schoenfeld, persistent IMBECILE, Schoenfeld, 09:40
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 09:39
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, LEJ Brouwer, 09:33
Schoenfeld, persistent IMBECILE, dda1, 09:32
Re: The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, Lloyd Parker, 09:29
Is Six Billion Vibrations in the Micro Realm = one Second in The macro, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:25
Re: The Physics Community, Lloyd Parker, 09:24
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Lloyd Parker, 09:22
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:13
Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?, Henning Makholm, 09:09
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 09:07
Re: String Theory question, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:58
Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?, jt64, 08:48
Re: "C" is a variable, tdp1001, 08:42
Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?, jt64, 08:38
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 08:38
Re: String Theory question, Henning Makholm, 08:37
Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?, Henning Makholm, 08:33
Re: A question between electromagnetism and inertial reference frame, Henning Makholm, 08:30
Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?, jt64, 08:25
Re: buildings in free-fall, Brian Whatcott, 08:25
Re: The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, Schoenfeld, 08:16
Re: time, John Bailey, 08:14
Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, News, 08:09
Re: The Bullet Puzzle, jt64, 08:05
Frame dependent distances in relativity?, jt64, 08:02
Re: The Bullet Puzzle, Edward Green, 07:54
Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, News, 07:53
Re: Temperature and Pressure at atomic level?, donstockbauer, 07:49
Re: time, donstockbauer, 07:46
Re: The Scientific Community And The Yellow Brick Road To Fantasy Land, BernardZ, 07:45
Re: The Bullet Puzzle, Edward Green, 07:44
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:21
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:14
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, jmfbahciv, 07:11
Re: The Bullet Puzzle, jt64, 07:08
Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 07:06
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, jmfbahciv, 07:05
Re: "C" is a variable, T Wake, 06:53
Re: Doing grams of Heroin/Meth/Cocain... " jailing " a hot babe., T Wake, 06:51
Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, T Wake, 06:51
Re: The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., T Wake, 06:47
Re: Patinha's Stash_Socket, Tampon_Socket, Bearded_Taco, Meat_Wallet., T Wake, 06:47
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 06:45
Re: The Bullet Puzzle, jt64, 06:44
Re: 0 / 0 is Not_a_Number, 1 / 0 is +Infinity., T Wake, 06:40
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Ian Parker, 06:39
Temperature and Pressure at atomic level?, joshipura, 06:22
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 06:19
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 06:15
Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, DV8, 06:01
Re: Well well ... :-), Jan Panteltje, 05:52
Re: The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, tadchem, 05:45
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, jmfbahciv, 05:42
0 / 0 is Not_a_Number, 1 / 0 is +Infinity., Jeff…Relf, 05:40
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 31, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:40
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, tadchem, 05:37
Re: The Bullet Puzzle, jt64, 05:27
Re: Thermal Conductivity and Specific Heat, Phat Bytestard, 05:25
Rehab for my Usenet addiction., Jeff…Relf, 05:10
Re: The Bullet Puzzle, jt64, 05:05
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, G. L. Bradford, 05:05
Re: The Scientific Community And The Yellow Brick Road To Fantasy Land, Fermat, 05:04
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Richard Herring, 04:57
Patinha's Stash_Socket, Tampon_Socket, Bearded_Taco, Meat_Wallet., Jeff…Relf, 04:47
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Ben Newsam, 03:59
Thermal Conductivity and Specific Heat, Magna Mater, 03:54
Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 03:35
Re: The Bullet Puzzle, Teja, 03:30
Re: String Theory question, tdp1001, 03:04
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 02:59
Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Proginoskes, 02:58
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.6: GR 3-body Linear Gravitational Motion and W, OsherD, 02:55
Re: Sabbir Rahman - Persitent and Perseverent Crackpot, Schoenfeld, 02:55
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 02:39
Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, The Flavored Coffee Guy, 02:09
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 02:04
Re: I want to learn quantum mechanics from scratch, Mirror Space, 02:03
Re: The Physics Community, Jonathan, 01:48
A question between electromagnetism and inertial reference frame, Muser, 01:44
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Odysseus, 01:33
Sabbir Rahman - Persitent and Perseverent Crackpot, dda1, 01:29
Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, The Flavored Coffee Guy, 01:22
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, fishfry, 01:20
Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 01:02
Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, nicksanspam, 00:56
Re: String Theory question, Robert Fischer Jr., 00:51
Re: The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, Koobee Wublee, 00:27
Re: time, Sam Wormley, 00:16
time, vyrtbg889y8bt6, 00:06
Re: Doing grams of Heroin/Meth/Cocain... " jailing " a hot babe., The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00

July 30, 2006

Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, tj Frazir, 23:58
Re: prof piano, you are a brillinat scientist, a brilliant man, whose intellect cannot be matched in the current scientific world, Gary Sokolich, 23:53
Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, tj Frazir, 23:39
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 23:36
Re: The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, hhc314, 23:29
WTC7 9/11 Collapse theory, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 23:21
The Physics Community Is A Historical Laughing Stock, Schoenfeld, 23:07
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, LEJ Brouwer, 23:06
Re: Sabbir Rahman - Crackpot, Schoenfeld, 22:52
Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Aratzio, 22:33
Re: selfishness, PerfectlyAble, 22:26
Re: Sabbir Rahman - Crackpot, LEJ Brouwer, 22:20
Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Sharon B, 22:16
Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Sharon B, 22:13
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 22:13
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, Carrot Juice, 22:11
Re: The Physics Community, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:58
Re: The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:56
Sabbir Rahman - Crackpot, dda1, 21:56
Re: buildings in free-fall, Schoenfeld, 21:32
The Scientific Community And The Yellow Brick Road To Fantasy Land, Schoenfeld, 21:30
Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, cindy_mah, 21:30
Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 21:25
Re: Why tethered electrons?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 21:25
Re: The Physics Community, schoenfeld1, 21:13
"C" is a variable, Tom Potter, 21:05
Re: The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 21:05
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.5: Information/Entropy and W, OsherD, 21:04
Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 20:52
Re: String Theory question, tdp1001, 20:46
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 20:39
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Spoonfed, 20:33
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, carlip-nospam, 20:32
Re: Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, Eeyore, 20:23
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 20:22
Re: India makes wind energy turbines for USA, cnctut, 20:20
Re: buildings in free-fall, T Wake, 20:20
Re: The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., T Wake, 20:19
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 20:17
Re: Young people can't live their lives as slow as old folks do., T Wake, 20:14
Re: The hard-facts of science quickly fade to the soft-feelings of religion., T Wake, 20:11
Re: The Physics Community, Jonathan, 20:10
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 20:09
Re: Doing grams of Heroin/Meth/Cocain... " jailing " a hot babe., T Wake, 20:09
Re: It's not silly to divide by zero., T Wake, 20:08
Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, jimp, 20:05
Re: Advanced Physics Problem Solving Methods, donstockbauer, 20:04
Re: Advanced Physics Problem Solving Methods, donstockbauer, 20:04
Clean Energy, Oil, The Bomb and Nuclear Power, The Flavored Coffee Guy, 20:02
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 20:02
Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, jimp, 19:55
Well well ... :-), Math Freak, 19:48
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Math Freak, 19:37
Re: Question about sci-fi physics, Jim Black, 19:37
Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 19:34
Re: buildings in free-fall, malibu, 19:31
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Edward Green, 19:29
Re: Advanced Physics Problem Solving Methods, operator jay, 19:08
Re: A field is a model of reality, like a map., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:06
Re: atmospheric pressures, Math Freak, 19:05
Re: Fields ??????, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:04
Re: buildings in free-fall, Schoenfeld, 19:00
Re: String Theory question, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:00
Re: The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 18:52
Re: The Physics Community, Spoonfed, 18:49
Re: buildings in free-fall, Brian Whatcott, 18:48
Re: Oh, those fun loving mathematicians..., Jens Kruse Andersen, 18:44
Re: Advanced Physics Problem Solving Methods, Sam Wormley, 18:42
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Math Freak, 18:39
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, G. L. Bradford, 18:37
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:36
Re: Young people can't live their lives as slow as old folks do., Edward Green, 18:31
Advanced Physics Problem Solving Methods, kendity555, 18:31
Re: Question about sci-fi physics, Edward Green, 18:29
Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Aratzio, 18:23
Re: Young people can't live their lives as slow as old folks do., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:11
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Jeff Root, 18:11
Re: The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:10
Re: The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:10
Re: Doing grams of Heroin/Meth/Cocain... " jailing " a hot babe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:09
Re: A field is a model of reality, like a map., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:08
Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:07
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, which of my beliefs seems Christian to you ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:07
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Jeff Root, 18:06
Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:03
Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:02
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Math Freak, 18:02
Re: It's not silly to divide by zero., The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Sam Wormley, 17:58
Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., dave hillstrom, 17:55
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, kendity555, 17:53
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 17:50
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Spoonfed, 17:49
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 17:35
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 17:29
Re: selfishness, uri, 17:07
Re: Question about sci-fi physics, Jim Black, 16:49
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 16:40
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, mike3, 16:20
Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Sharon B, 16:12
Re: God is pure, Morpheal, 16:11
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.4: One-dimensional Version of Hydrogen Molecular Ion in QM via W, OsherD, 16:09
Re: It's not silly to divide by zero., Art Deco, 16:07
Re: God is pure, Morpheal, 16:03
Young people can't live their lives as slow as old folks do., Jeff…Relf, 15:53
Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Sharon B, 15:51
Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., dave hillstrom, 15:50
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.4: One-dimensional Version of Hydrogen Molecular Ion in QM via W, OsherD, 15:50
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:45
Re: Gravitational Doppler, Lester Zick, 15:44
A practical application of the Stefan-Boltzmann law, Juan, 15:40
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.3: Projectile Range cs Resistance and Crosswind Via W, OsherD, 15:38
Question about sci-fi physics, Aki Tuomi, 15:37
Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, Juan, 15:30
Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, Juan, 15:24
Re: Everyone who ever died was being punished... including Christ himself ?, Edward Green, 15:15
Re: Wrong construing of the Boltzmann factor, E=h<nu> is wrong, Salmon Egg, 15:13
Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, Juan, 15:09
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:50
The hard-facts of science quickly fade to the soft-feelings of religion., Jeff…Relf, 14:43
Re: The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., Robert Fischer Jr., 14:41
Oh, those fun loving mathematicians..., Edward Green, 14:34
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, greysky, 14:28
Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, Edward Green, 14:13
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 14:00
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 13:57
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 13:55
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 13:54
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 13:50
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 13:47
Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics", Igor, 13:46
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 13:43
It's not silly to divide by zero., Jeff…Relf, 13:36
Man's Hell/Heaven lays in the fulfillment of his dreams., Jeff…Relf, 13:16
The strings are notions ( like lines on a map ) representing real objects., Jeff…Relf, 13:10
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 13:09
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 13:09
Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 12:59
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Traveler, 12:56
Doing grams of Heroin/Meth/Cocain... " jailing " a hot babe., Jeff…Relf, 12:46
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:39
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Ian Parker, 11:32
Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics", donstockbauer, 11:22
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy), 11:09
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 11:08
Re: String Theory question, tdp1001, 10:44
Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., T Wake, 10:39
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, which of my beliefs seems Christian to you ?, T Wake, 10:39
"The Error in Relativistic Physics", Eht, 10:36
Re: Infinity is not a NaN., T Wake, 10:35
Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., T Wake, 10:34
"The Error in Relativistic Physics", Eht, 10:31
Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 10:20
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, J. Horta, 10:18
Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 10:13
Re: A field is a model of reality, like a map., Mark L. Fergerson, 10:10
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Edward Green, 10:06
Re: Geomagnetic field reason, kdthrge, 10:05
A field is a model of reality, like a map., Jeff…Relf, 10:04
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, LEJ Brouwer, 09:59
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Math Freak, 09:55
Re: Chaecking for absurd numbers., Sharon B, 09:52
Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Jeff…Relf, 09:43
Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Jeff…Relf, 09:36
Re: Fields ??????, Sam Wormley, 09:30
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:11
Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:06
Ha_Ha_Hanson, which of my beliefs seems Christian to you ?, Jeff…Relf, 08:56
Fields ??????, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:52
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Sam Wormley, 08:45
Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 08:39
Chaecking for absurd numbers., Jeff…Relf, 08:26
Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 08:22
Re: The Bullet Puzzle, Sam Wormley, 08:21
Re: String Theory question, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:19
Re: Geomagnetic field reason, tadchem, 08:19
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, Martin Hogbin, 08:01
Infinity is not a NaN., Jeff…Relf, 07:41
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 07:27
Re: Thee most basic/fruitful postulate of hard/soft science/religion., T Wake, 07:18
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, Jim Black, 07:09
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 07:06
Re: ( $ 10 / $ 4 ) means: $ 10 is 250 percent of $ 4, T Wake, 07:00
Re: When, where and _What_., T Wake, 06:56
Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 06:43
Re: String Theory question, Golden Boar, 06:15
Geomagnetic field reason, h_v_ansari, 06:09
Re: String Theory question, Jan Panteltje, 06:05
Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 05:59
Wrong construing of the Boltzmann factor, E=h<nu> is wrong, h_v_ansari, 05:59
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, will1, 05:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Teja, 05:58
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 05:53
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, jmfbahciv, 05:49
Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, h_v_ansari, 05:48
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, jmfbahciv, 05:46
Re: String Theory question, Golden Boar, 05:32
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, jmfbahciv, 05:31
Re: buildings in free-fall, Ben Newsam, 05:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 04:49
Re: The Bullet Puzzle, St.M, 04:29
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 02:37
Re: String Theory question, tdp1001, 02:37
Re: The Bullet Puzzle, CWatters, 02:36
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, frank_k_sheldon, 02:34
Re: NASA declines to protect the Planet Earth, Ben Newsam, 02:20
Re: How to e-publish?, Ben Newsam, 02:16
The Bullet Puzzle, Teja, 02:10
Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 01:25
Re: String Theory question, tdp1001, 01:06
Re: String Theory question, Y.Porat, 00:58
Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 00:35
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Richard Schultz, 00:23
Re: String Theory question, tdp1001, 00:18
Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Edward Green, 00:12
Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, tj Frazir, 00:06
Re: buildings in free-fall, blair . houghton, 00:01
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, tj Frazir, 00:00
The (not-so-)Infinite Universe, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
Re: Not_a_Number times anything equals Not_a_Number., The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00

July 29, 2006

Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, tj Frazir, 23:45
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, josephus, 23:34
Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, tj Frazir, 23:31
Re: buildings in free-fall, Schoenfeld, 23:31
Re: String Theory question, Robert Fischer Jr., 23:26
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Odysseus, 23:25
Re: String Theory question, Electric Monk, 23:14
Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., tj Frazir, 23:14
Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Edward Green, 23:12
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 22:57
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Bill Hobba, 22:55
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, Sam Wormley, 22:49
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, tj Frazir, 22:46
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, tj Frazir, 22:39
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, Edward Green, 22:34
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 22:03
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 21:53
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 21:45
Re: String Theory question, FrediFizzx, 21:21
Re: ( $ 10 / $ 4 ) means: $ 10 is 250 percent of $ 4, Randy Poe, 21:03
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Jeff Root, 20:57
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Jeff Root, 20:49
Re: buildings in free-fall, Phil Holman, 20:41
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, cj, 20:27
Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, Ben Newsam, 20:07
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 20:06
Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:03
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Ben Newsam, 20:02
Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, tadchem, 19:59
Re: String Theory question, Edward Green, 19:57
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, tadchem, 19:43
Re: buildings in free-fall, Edward Green, 19:42
Re: String Theory question, Henning Makholm, 19:38
Re: String Theory question, Sam Wormley, 19:28
Re: String Theory question, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:20
Re: When, where and _What_., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:16
Re: entropy is a subset of Ampere-Maxwell law Re: 10^120 to tile Universe & gravity 10^40, QncyMI, 19:08
C-SPAN this Saturday, July 29th at 8 pm EDT, hetware, 19:08
String Theory question, Robert Fischer Jr., 19:02
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Sam Wormley, 19:00
Re: ( $ 10 / $ 4 ) means: $ 10 is 250 percent of $ 4, Bill Snyder, 18:39
GAB NOMINATION: Re: The Angular_Diameter_Distance is 46 giga light-years., Art Deco, 18:23
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 18:18
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 18:01
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 18:00
Re: The Angular_Diameter_Distance is 46 giga light-years., Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:56
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:54
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, cj, 17:49
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Jeff Root, 17:40
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, george, 17:10
Re: Why tethered electrons?, Edward Green, 17:02
Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, Matthew Lybanon, 17:00
Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:59
Re: work by magnetic forces - elementary question, Sam Wormley, 16:57
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 16:54
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Sam Wormley, 16:51
work by magnetic forces - elementary question, cj, 16:50
Re: ( $ 10 / $ 4 ) means: $ 10 is 250 percent of $ 4, Matthew Lybanon, 16:44
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, Sam Wormley, 16:41
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, frank_k_sheldon, 16:39
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Cardinal Chunder, 16:30
Re: Sphere rolling down a sphere, Henning Makholm, 16:24
Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., hanson, 16:22
Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., hanson, 16:22
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 16:22
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 16:22
Re: Hanson, hanson, 16:22
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, hanson, 16:22
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, hanson, 16:22
Re: buildings in free-fall, Phil Holman, 16:17
Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:17
Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:08
Re: The Physics Community, malibu, 16:04
Re: buildings in free-fall, Edward Green, 16:01
Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:57
Re: The Physics Community, CWatters, 15:49
Re: ( $ 10 / $ 4 ) means: $ 10 is 250 percent of $ 4, Art Deco, 15:23
Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, Phat Bytestard, 15:21
Re: The Angular_Diameter_Distance is 46 giga light-years., Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:08
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:08
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Sam Wormley, 15:03
Re: buildings in free-fall, Bruce Scott TOK, 14:52
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Sam Wormley, 14:45
Re: The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 14:38
( $ 10 / $ 4 ) means: $ 10 is 250 percent of $ 4, Jeff…Relf, 14:34
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 14:34
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, frank_k_sheldon, 14:28
Re: The Physics Community, mtv2323, 14:26
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 14:22
Re: The Physics Community, mtv2323, 14:22
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:20
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Sam Wormley, 14:15
Re: Lightning and Cars, Ken S. Tucker, 14:04
Re: The Physics Community, James Dolan, 14:03
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 14:03
Re: Can electromagnets push?, will1, 13:55
Re: The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 13:47
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, donstockbauer, 13:45
Re: Why tethered electrons?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 13:29
Re: buildings in free-fall, Schoenfeld, 13:27
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Jeff Root, 13:26
Hanson, platopes, 13:20
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, scientefeec, 13:19
Re: The Physics Community, Ben Newsam, 13:18
Re: The Angular_Diameter_Distance is 46 giga light-years., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:17
Re: The Physics Community, Ben Newsam, 13:15
Re: MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, jimp, 13:15
Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, Igor, 13:12
Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, Igor, 13:07
The Angular_Diameter_Distance is 46 giga light-years., Jeff…Relf, 13:06
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 13:05
Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, Ben Newsam, 13:05
buildings in free-fall, Edward Green, 12:55
Re: The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 12:53
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Igor, 12:48
Re: Sphere rolling down a sphere, CWatters, 12:48
Re: The Physics Community, Timothy Murphy, 12:47
Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:47
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 12:42
Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Phil Carmody, 12:37
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Igor, 12:36
Re: The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 12:33
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Igor, 12:30
Re: The Physics Community, CWatters, 12:25
Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, jimp, 12:25
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 12:24
MICROWAVEABLE HEAT RETENTIVE PLATES, Juan, 12:24
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 12:22
Re: Hawking Radiation, malibu, 12:19
Academia: The Most Ignorant In Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 12:17
Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, CWatters, 12:13
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 12:12
Re: God is pure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:12
Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:11
Re: The Physics Community, malibu, 12:10
Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:10
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 12:09
Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:09
Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:08
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, malibu, 12:05
The Physics Community, Schoenfeld, 12:05
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 12:03
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, hetware, 12:01
Re: anomalous spinning, CWatters, 12:00
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), malibu, 12:00
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Sam Wormley, 11:55
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 11:52
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Sam Wormley, 11:50
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 11:36
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Sam Wormley, 11:13
Re: WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, Sam Wormley, 11:11
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), Denis Feldmann, 11:07
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, tj Frazir, 11:01
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, tj Frazir, 10:58
Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, G.L. Cross, 10:46
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), Timothy Murphy, 10:45
T.J., if you doubt me, send a private investigator., Jeff…Relf, 10:44
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Edward Green, 10:40
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, tj Frazir, 10:39
WMAP and different values for the distance to the cosmic horizon, frank_k_sheldon, 10:37
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 10:27
Re: What would it look like?, Sorcerer, 10:23
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, tj Frazir, 10:23
Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Peter Webb, 10:21
Re: Sphere rolling down a sphere, MrX, 10:14
Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, tj Frazir, 10:11
Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, tj Frazir, 10:09
Re: Phenomalism, tadchem, 10:03
Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Sam Wormley, 10:00
Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, Sam Wormley, 09:56
Re: An oceangoing sigless gps in my fish, tj Frazir, 09:55
Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, tj Frazir, 09:52
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), John Baez, 09:49
Re: An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented, tj Frazir, 09:36
Re: Hawking Radiation, dedanoe, 09:35
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), John Baez, 09:32
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, terphenyl, 09:30
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), John Baez, 09:29
Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., tj Frazir, 09:27
Re: one-ask, dedanoe, 09:25
Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, Martin Hogbin, 09:23
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), John Baez, 09:13
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, oldogf, 09:10
Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, dedanoe, 09:09
Re: T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:04
Re: Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, dedanoe, 08:55
Re: The Environmentalists' Agenda, Ben Newsam, 08:53
Re: The Environmentalists' Agenda, Ben Newsam, 08:52
Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, tadchem, 08:50
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Ben Newsam, 08:47
Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, DV8, 08:42
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Ben Newsam, 08:42
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 08:25
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:17
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Eht, 08:14
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Eht, 08:14
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:00
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, G. L. Bradford, 07:03
Re: Lightning and Cars, Jan Panteltje, 06:13
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, jonathan, 05:41
T.J.'s forked tongue makes Whitie look honest., Jeff…Relf, 05:33
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, jmfbahciv, 05:31
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 05:26
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 05:01
Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Steph, 04:54
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Volker Hetzer, 04:31
Re: anomalous spinning, top9, 04:27
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 04:15
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, G. L. Bradford, 04:13
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 03:58
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.2: Exponentiation and Papers on Lambert W, OsherD, 03:57
Re: Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Phil Carmody, 03:53
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.2: Exponentiation and Papers on Lambert W, OsherD, 03:41
Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?, michelebargeman, 03:34
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.2: Exponentiation and Papers on Lambert W, OsherD, 03:25
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Schoenfeld, 03:20
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Schoenfeld, 03:13
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 03:06
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 02:49
What would it look like?, mike3, 02:46
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, hanson, 02:44
Re: Can electromagnets push?, Jim Black, 02:38
Re: one-ask, Ludo, 01:47
Re: Can electromagnets push?, Marko, 01:39
Re: E=mc2, Y.Porat, 01:37
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, Phat Bytestard, 01:29
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, Y.Porat, 01:15
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 01:15
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Sam Wormley, 01:14
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 00:52
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, hanson, 00:52
OT: Ignore this crazy troll thread, Jim Smith, 00:36
Named numbers, such as Smiths, have all sorts of intriguing properties, Sam Wormley, 00:32
An oceangoing rover gathers unprecedented data, Sam Wormley, 00:31
OT: Ignore this crazy troll thread, Jim Smith, 00:30
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 00:17
Re: OT: Ignore the sock-puppet troll "james_c_cracked", Jim Smith, 00:12
Re: OT: Ignore the sock-puppet troll "james_c_cracked", Jim Smith, 00:06

July 28, 2006

Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, mmeron, 23:03
Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:37
Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, Sam Wormley, 22:34
Rydberg atom mirror makes its debut, Sam Wormley, 22:28
Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, ny2292000, 22:17
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Bob Cain, 22:15
Re: OT: Ignore the sock-puppet troll "james_c_cracked", ward hardman is an ass, 22:05
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 21:45
Re: Can electromagnets push?, will1, 21:44
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 21:41
OT: Ignore the sock-puppet troll "james_c_cracked", Jim Smith, 21:30
Re: OT: Ignore worthless troll's posts, Bill Snyder, 21:08
Re: OT: Ignore worthless troll's posts: I am losing everything, and there is no escape..., Raving Moonies. The Cult of Meow!, 21:08
Re: OT: Ignore worthless troll's posts, wfh_jr, 20:58
OT: Ignore worthless troll's posts, Jim Smith, 20:55
Re: Sphere rolling down a sphere, Dr Chumley, 20:34
Republicans Get The Message LOUD & CLEAR! DEFEAT!, platopes, 20:30
Re: Uh Oh, Discrepancy Alert, Hoggle, 20:26
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Sorcerer, 20:24
Re: SI units can't model a Super_Planck_Density scenario., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:23
Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:22
Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, platopes, 20:20
Ha_Ha_Hanson, do you kill people for a living ?, Jeff…Relf, 20:06
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 20:04
Re: How to e-publish?, Ben Newsam, 20:02
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, cnctut, 19:53
SI units can't model a Super_Planck_Density scenario., Jeff…Relf, 19:40
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Traveler, 19:34
Thee most basic/fruitful postulate of hard/soft science/religion., Jeff…Relf, 19:27
Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Sam Wormley, 19:22
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, cnctut, 19:16
Re: curses, Richard Tobin, 19:03
Re: Lightning and Cars, Ken S. Tucker, 18:53
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 18:40
Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., T Wake, 18:32
Anyone replicated this yet?..., CWatters, 18:32
Re: Sphere rolling down a sphere, Henning Makholm, 18:18
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 18:09
Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:57
Sphere rolling down a sphere, MrX, 17:55
Re: Can electromagnets push?, Jan Panteltje, 17:42
Re: conversion formula, CWatters, 17:34
Re: Can electromagnets push?, Jim Black, 17:33
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Sam Wormley, 17:21
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 17:16
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 17:13
Re: Can electromagnets push?, Marko, 17:12
Re: Lightning and Cars, Jan Panteltje, 17:11
Calculator, janne, 16:56
Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, hanson, 16:56
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, george, 16:54
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Sorcerer, 16:54
Re: Can electromagnets push?, Marko, 16:48
Re: Jamming the human senses, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:46
Re: conversion formula, tadchem, 16:39
Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., T Wake, 16:32
Koobee Wublee - Shit Eater, dda1, 16:28
Re: If Puddle_Chuck was smart..., T Wake, 16:25
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., dda1, 16:22
Re: Can electromagnets push?, Jan Panteltje, 16:20
Re: Can electromagnets push?, will1, 16:13
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Jim Black, 15:58
our universe is merely 3 dimensional and 4 dimensional space-time is for irrlehrer Re: Pressure_Time_Space: When, where and _How_, a_plutonium, 15:36
Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:34
Re: If Puddle_Chuck was smart..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:33
Re: conversion formula, Randy Poe, 15:18
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 15:09
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 14:41
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 14:39
Re: conversion formula, rob_6364, 14:37
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 14:29
Re: Can electromagnets push?, Marko, 14:24
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, edprochak, 14:03
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 13:56
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 13:50
Re: Can electromagnets push?, will1, 13:48
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Randy Poe, 13:46
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, carlip-nospam, 13:11
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Randy Poe, 13:10
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 13:08
Re: Lightning and Cars, Ken S. Tucker, 13:08
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Igor, 13:08
Re: If Puddle_Chuck was smart..., T Wake, 13:00
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Igor, 12:59
Re: Everyone who ever died was being punished... including Christ himself ?, T Wake, 12:59
Re: Lightning and Cars, Jan Panteltje, 12:54
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Schoenfeld, 12:41
Re: conversion formula, Sam Wormley, 12:35
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Randy Poe, 12:30
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 12:28
Re: Lightning and Cars, Ken S. Tucker, 12:19
If Puddle_Chuck was smart..., Jeff…Relf, 12:18
Everyone who ever died was being punished... including Christ himself ?, Jeff…Relf, 12:12
Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Sam Wormley, 12:10
Re: Can electromagnets push?, Jan Panteltje, 12:04
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, dlzc, 12:00
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, hanson, 11:45
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, hanson, 11:45
Re: Lightning and Cars, Jan Panteltje, 11:45
Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:43
Re: curses, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:41
Re: Nature doesn't care about our standards, especially at extreme densities., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:41
Re: Nature doesn't care about our standards, especially at extreme densities., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:40
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, bryanjugglercryptographer, 11:27
Re: Nature doesn't care about our standards, especially at extreme densities., T Wake, 11:27
Re: This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., T Wake, 11:20
Re: When, where and _What_., T Wake, 11:19
conversion formula, rob_6364, 11:19
Re: Can electromagnets push?, Euler Cheung, 11:14
Re: curses, Richard Herring, 10:59
Re: Lightning and Cars, operator jay, 10:49
Re: one-ask, Sam Wormley, 10:32
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Sam Wormley, 10:22
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:11
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), Pubkeybreaker, 10:07
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 09:52
Nature doesn't care about our standards, especially at extreme densities., Jeff…Relf, 09:49
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:44
Nature doesn't care about our standards, especially at extreme densities., Jeff…Relf, 09:40
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Ken S. Tucker, 09:33
Re: "Is String Theory Justified?", donstockbauer, 09:14
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, Andy Resnick, 09:02
"Is String Theory Justified?", Eht, 08:49
"Is String Theory Justified?", Eht, 08:48
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 08:43
Re: Jamming the human senses, Andy Resnick, 08:39
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Claude, 08:36
Re: tension of wall of pressurized pipe, Bernhard Kuemel, 08:15
Re: tension of wall of pressurized pipe, Bernhard Kuemel, 08:08
Re: tension of wall of pressurized pipe, Bernhard Kuemel, 07:58
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:34
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 06:50
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, gjedwards, 06:25
Re: Can electromagnets push?, Jan Panteltje, 06:08
Re: Jamming the human senses, Jan Panteltje, 06:05
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, tomgee, 05:42
Re: Jamming the human senses, jmfbahciv, 05:41
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, G. L. Bradford, 05:19
When, where and _What_., Jeff…Relf, 05:16
This postulate is the most basic and most fruitful..., Jeff…Relf, 04:46
CSI detective work on E = mcc Re: commission of women set up to find the true history behind Mileva Maric Re: Mileva Maric contribution of 1905 Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2, a_plutonium, 04:42
Re: I want to learn quantum mechanics from scratch, FrediFizzx, 04:30
Can electromagnets push?, marko . horvat, 04:06
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ian Parker, 03:46
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Odysseus, 03:36
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, CWatters, 03:20
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 03:03
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, J. Horta, 02:52
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Bob Cain, 02:31
Re: anomalous spinning, top9, 02:28
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 02:24
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 02:23
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 02:21
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:12
one-ask, Ludo, 02:05
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Bob Cain, 01:51
Re: I want to learn quantum mechanics from scratch, RadicalLibertarian, 01:46
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Thomas Johnson, 01:38
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Jim Black, 01:29
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Bob Cain, 01:28
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, jonathan, 01:26
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 01:26
Re: Hawking Radiation, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 01:18
Hawking Radiation, John Schutkeker, 01:03
Re: What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, jimp, 00:45
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, jt64, 00:42
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ? Dense B's madness spreads, jt64, 00:33
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Sam Wormley, 00:11
new microwave-based technique for analysing fresco paintings, Sam Wormley, 00:08

July 27, 2006

Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, bryanjugglercryptographer, 23:52
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, J. Horta, 23:42
Re: Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Schoenfeld, 23:27
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Schoenfeld, 23:25
Re: Jamming the human senses, Schoenfeld, 23:24
What can I do with a Bachelors In Physics?, kendity555, 23:16
Re: Jamming the human senses, Schoenfeld, 23:09
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Schoenfeld, 23:07
Re: Jamming the human senses, Tom Potter, 22:55
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 22:54
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Bill Hobba, 22:40
Re: Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, hans . 1derful, 22:40
Academia: The Most Ignorant In The Society By Design, Schoenfeld, 22:18
Re: Wheel Cart + Aerodynamics, cnctut, 22:11
Re: Evening-Morning, duhme, 22:05
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Edward Green, 22:00
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 21:59
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 21:57
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 21:55
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 21:54
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 21:53
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, Phat Bytestard, 21:52
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, Phat Bytestard, 21:49
Re: wiley interscience article needed, will1, 21:47
Re: Wheel Cart + Aerodynamics, Phil Holman, 21:41
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 21:38
Re: Lightning and Cars, John Bailey, 21:19
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 21:15
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 21:12
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ? Dense B's madness spreads, Art Deco, 21:00
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., surrealistic-dream, 21:00
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 20:58
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Edward Green, 20:51
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 20:51
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 20:35
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 20:35
Moderation illustrates the downfall of western civilization, Edward Green, 20:30
Re: Wheel Cart + Aerodynamics, tadchem, 20:21
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, tj Frazir, 20:07
Re: My sobriety., Bill Snyder, 20:06
Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., the_ghostbuster, 19:57
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Tom Roberts, 19:52
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 19:49
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Tom Roberts, 19:44
Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., the_ghostbuster, 19:38
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Sorcerer, 19:35
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, mmeron, 19:29
Re: Physics is dead!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:20
Re: wiley interscience article needed, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:18
Re: Physics is dead!, mmeron, 19:12
wiley interscience article needed, n00dle0@xxxxxxxxx, 19:06
Re: Franck-Hertz experiment is not quantized, Don Klipstein, 19:03
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Matt, 18:48
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 18:43
Re: Wheel Cart + Aerodynamics, Abstraction, 18:35
Re: Understanding quantum mechnanics, T Wake, 18:28
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Cardinal Chunder, 18:26
Re: My sobriety., T Wake, 18:24
Re: Understanding quantum mechnanics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:16
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 17:57
Re: Jamming the human senses, Edward Green, 17:36
Re: Lightning and Cars, panteltje, 17:35
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Edward Green, 17:30
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 17:24
Re: Jamming the human senses, Timo A. Nieminen, 17:15
Re: entropy is a subset of Ampere-Maxwell law Re: 10^120 to tile Universe & gravity 10^40, QncyMI, 16:39
Re: Wheel Cart + Aerodynamics, tadchem, 16:29
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Bob Cain, 16:28
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 16:28
Re: theoretical explanation Re: In an Atom Totality E = mcc, but in a Big Bang or String theory E = mccc and higher, QncyMI, 16:27
Re: time is the only dimension (RBF); Einstein & co. naked on the beach!, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:03
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Bob Cain, 15:56
Re: Jamming the human senses, Andy Resnick, 15:53
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 15:45
Re: Jamming the human senses, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:33
Re: Lightning and Cars, Ken S. Tucker, 15:29
Re: Pressure_Time_Space: When, where and _How_, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:26
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 15:26
Re: commission of women set up to find the true history behind Mileva Maric Re: Mileva Maric contribution of 1905 Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:26
Re: commission of women set up to find the true history behind Mileva Maric Re: Mileva Maric contribution of 1905 Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2, a_plutonium, 15:18
My sobriety., Jeff…Relf, 15:03
Re: Pressure_Time_Space: When, where and _How_, a_plutonium, 14:50
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 14:45
Re: Jamming the human senses, Greg Hansen, 14:36
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 14:35
Re: Lightning and Cars, John Bailey, 14:29
Re: A question on gyroscopic effects., CWatters, 14:10
Re: anomalous spinning, CWatters, 13:58
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 13:56
Re: Wheel Cart + Aerodynamics, CWatters, 13:56
Hey Jeff, watch your neighbours don't see this, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:54
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, John Sefton, 13:52
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 13:44
Re: 3+ strikes... T.J. is out., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:44
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 13:40
Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, Igor, 13:21
Re: No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?, Igor, 13:18
Re: Lightning and Cars, Jan Panteltje, 13:05
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 12:56
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 12:37
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 12:27
OT: Pyramid Schemes (was Re: !MAKE MONEY USING PAYPAL- IT WORKS!), T Wake, 12:22
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 12:04
Re: 3+ strikes... T.J. is out., T Wake, 11:59
Re: curses, Richard Herring, 11:41
3+ strikes... T.J. is out., Jeff…Relf, 11:35
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 11:26
Re: !MAKE MONEY USING PAYPAL- IT WORKS!, T Wake, 10:23
Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, Mark L. Fergerson, 10:19
Re: How did you finance the pressure cooker ?, T Wake, 10:17
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, T Wake, 10:15
Re: T.J. offered me a job, I declined... end of story., T Wake, 10:14
Re: T.J. offered me a job, I declined... end of story., T Wake, 10:14
Re: God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:14
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 10:13
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, T Wake, 10:12
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Ben Newsam, 10:11
Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., T Wake, 10:11
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 10:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 10:05
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.1: Generalized W Lambda Function, Dr Chumley, 10:05
Re: God is pure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:59
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 09:59
Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:58
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 09:55
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 09:53
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 09:53
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 09:53
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 09:53
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 09:52
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 09:52
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 09:51
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Sam Wormley, 09:51
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 09:49
Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, dedanoe, 09:48
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Schoenfeld, 09:44
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Cardinal Chunder, 09:42
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 09:38
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 09:38
Re: simpleton question on stillborn universes, John Bailey, 09:37
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 09:37
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 09:36
Re: Lightning and Cars, Sam Wormley, 09:35
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 09:32
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 09:30
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 09:30
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., surrealistic-dream, 09:29
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Schoenfeld, 09:29
Re: T.J. offered me a job, I declined... end of story., tj Frazir, 09:29
Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, Schoenfeld, 09:29
Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, Schoenfeld, 09:27
Re: Jamming the human senses, cnctut, 09:26
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, tj Frazir, 09:24
Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, DV8, 09:05
Re: OT: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, DV8, 09:05
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Andy Resnick, 08:56
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:55
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:46
Re: Jamming the human senses, Andy Resnick, 08:43
Re: Jamming the human senses, Andy Resnick, 08:37
Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, Andy Resnick, 08:36
Re: Is The Human Soul A law of Physics ?, Andy Resnick, 08:32
Re: T.J. offered me a job, I declined... end of story., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:29
Re: T.J. offered me a job, I declined... end of story., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:28
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Paul B. Andersen, 08:24
T.J. offered me a job, I declined... end of story., Jeff…Relf, 08:21
anomalous spinning, top9, 08:20
A question on gyroscopic effects., Murmur, 08:12
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 08:10
Re: Lightning and Cars, John Bailey, 07:59
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 07:52
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 07:23
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, ianparker2, 06:21
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Richard Herring, 06:21
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, jmfbahciv, 05:09
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Cardinal Chunder, 04:43
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Cardinal Chunder, 04:33
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Y.Porat, 00:38
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 00:28

July 25, 2006

Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Bob Cain, 22:21
Re: Always use doubles ( 64 bit floating point )., mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 22:18
Re: Always use doubles ( 64 bit floating point )., Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:10
Always use doubles ( 64 bit floating point )., Jeff…Relf, 22:08
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 21:58
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Tom M, 21:49
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 21:48
Re: Need help with an easy equation, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:31
Need help with an easy equation, Mike H, 21:24
Re: A new, physics-based approach to analyzing simple games, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 21:16
Re: NASA NUKED Jupiter !, Ben Newsam, 21:14
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:13
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 21:11
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 21:08
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 21:01
Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Bob Cain, 20:51
Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Bob Cain, 20:48
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, lucasea, 20:35
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Tom Roberts, 20:26
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, lucasea, 20:21
Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Michael A. Terrell, 20:19
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Tom Roberts, 20:18
Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Bob May, 20:14
Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., T Wake, 20:13
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, T Wake, 20:12
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, fkasner, 20:06
Re: crap, Crap and MORE CRAP, T Wake, 20:04
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:52
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, CWatters, 19:37
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Edward Green, 19:36
Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Gary Sokolich, 19:34
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 19:30
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 19:26
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Tom S, 19:25
Re: Inflatable Sculpture Accident in England, Edward Green, 19:21
Re: Inflatable Sculpture Accident in England, Sorcerer, 19:12
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Cardinal Chunder, 19:10
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 18:58
Inflatable Sculpture Accident in England, gjedwards, 18:41
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:31
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, platopes, 18:04
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, jt64, 17:58
Spherical Coil, Martin Winer, 17:17
Re: Laser could create dark-matter particles ?!?, Sam Wormley, 17:02
Re: Imagine an endless array of numbers., mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 16:59
Laser could create dark-matter particles ?!?, Sam Wormley, 16:53
Re: It won't be long now before integers get a NaN flag., mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 16:51
Re: crap, Crap and MORE CRAP, tadchem, 16:44
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., surrealistic-dream, 16:25
Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2,easy and simple; Jewish religion stealing of Mileva Maric; attention please Michael Getler, PBS ombudsman, a_plutonium, 16:21
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 786 July 25, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, mmeron, 16:15
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Uncle Al, 16:13
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 16:07
Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2,easy and simple; Jewish religion stealing of Mileva Maric; attention please Michael Getler, PBS ombudsman, a_plutonium, 15:51
Re: crap, Crap and MORE CRAP, uri, 15:49
Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Thunderbird, 15:48
Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2,easy and simple; Jewish religion stealing of Mileva Maric; attention please Michael Getler, PBS ombudsman, Dom, 15:28
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 15:15
Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2,easy and simple; Jewish religion stealing of Mileva Maric; attention please Michael Getler, PBS ombudsman, Pubkeybreaker, 15:13
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:12
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Richard J Kinch, 15:10
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 15:09
Re: crap, Crap and MORE CRAP, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:07
Re: force of a kite, cnctut, 15:03
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:00
Re: force of a kite, John C . Polasek, 14:58
Mileva Maric contribution of 1905 Re: E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2,easy and simple; Jewish religion stealing, a_plutonium, 14:51
Re: selfishness, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 14:43
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 14:33
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 14:29
Re: I want to learn quantum mechanics from scratch, Ken S. Tucker, 14:28
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 14:23
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 14:17
Re: I want to learn quantum mechanics from scratch, Sam Wormley, 14:16
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Golden Boar, 14:02
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Y.Porat, 13:59
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, mmeron, 13:53
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Ken S. Tucker, 13:52
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 13:41
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 13:32
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Richard Schultz, 13:30
Re: crap, Crap and MORE CRAP, T Wake, 13:25
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., tomgee, 13:23
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 13:18
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., tomgee, 13:17
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 13:16
Re: crap, Crap and MORE CRAP, uri, 13:13
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Salmon Egg, 13:12
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 13:12
Re: Imagine an endless array of numbers., T Wake, 13:09
Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Rich Grise, 13:08
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 13:00
AIRES gives fatal error messages, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 12:45
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 12:33
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 12:21
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:16
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:15
Re: I've held the same job for 13+ years., Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:14
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 12:09
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, jimp, 12:05
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 12:01
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 11:53
Re: Imagine an endless array of numbers., Sven Hesse, 11:40
Re: force of a kite, Richard Herring, 11:30
Re: "The Nuclear Boy Scout" on DVD (UK), donstockbauer, 11:24
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, Randy Poe, 11:23
Re: Unlike Sven_Hesse, I get paid to code., Bill Snyder, 11:18
Re: Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, T Wake, 11:16
Re: Imagine an endless array of numbers., T Wake, 11:14
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 11:13
Where can I read up on clear steal ? what is it exactly ?, Jeff…Relf, 11:13
Re: I've held the same job for 13+ years., T Wake, 11:12
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 11:12
Imagine an endless array of numbers., Jeff…Relf, 11:07
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 11:02
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:58
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:49
Re: Gravitational Doppler, J.A. Legris, 10:44
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Ben Newsam, 10:44
I want to learn quantum mechanics from scratch, Mike H, 10:43
I've held the same job for 13+ years., Jeff…Relf, 10:43
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:39
Re: Gravitational Doppler, rick++, 10:36
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:29
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:27
Re: Einstein said: shit you ed up loons cant understand, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:27
Re: Unlike Sven_Hesse, I get paid to code., Sven Hesse, 10:27
Re: It won't be long now before integers get a NaN flag., Sven Hesse, 10:26
Re: Unlike Sven_Hesse, I get paid to code., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:24
Re: Unlike Sven_Hesse, I get paid to code., T Wake, 10:19
Re: Einstein said: shit you ed up loons cant understand, T Wake, 10:18
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, T Wake, 10:18
Unlike Sven_Hesse, I get paid to code., Jeff…Relf, 10:09
Re: Einstein said: Time is what the clock measure., Ben Newsam, 09:56
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues, john Mrtiy, 09:49
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues, john Mrtiy, 09:48
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues, john Mrtiy, 09:45
"The Properties of the Aether", Eht, 09:43
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.2: Time-Dependent Eigenvalues, john Mrtiy, 09:39
Re: Three basic questions, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:30
Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Lostgallifreyan, 09:28
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, tj Frazir, 09:23
Re: Einstein said: shit you ed up loons cant understand, tj Frazir, 09:20
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Richard Herring, 09:02
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., jem, 09:02
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, Schoenfeld, 08:58
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, T Wake, 08:57
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Sam Wormley, 08:48
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 786 July 25, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 08:40
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Richard, 08:39
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., T Wake, 08:24
Re: Dee Dee: 24 years old, long red hair, a pirate/genius/whore/virgin., T Wake, 08:22
Re: The number 1 is not enough to convey: X / X = 100 percent of X., T Wake, 08:20
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 08:15
Re: It won't be long now before integers get a NaN flag., T Wake, 08:14
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Richard Herring, 08:12
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, T Wake, 08:11
Re: selfishness, T Wake, 08:10
Re: software for pdes, donstockbauer, 08:06
Re: selfishness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:02
Re: It won't be long now before integers get a NaN flag., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:01
Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Michael A. Terrell, 07:39
Re: It won't be long now before integers get a NaN flag., Golden Boar, 07:35
software for pdes, thinktank, 07:35
It won't be long now before integers get a NaN flag., Jeff…Relf, 07:18
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:17
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, CWatters, 07:14
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, CWatters, 07:13
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:12
Re: selfishness, uri, 07:12
Re: Still to this day, an integer divide by zero aborts the application ! ?, mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 07:06
Re: Dee Dee: 24 years old, long red hair, a pirate/genius/whore/virgin., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:06
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:03
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Schoenfeld, 07:02
Re: use quantum mechanics to explain Relativity, Sorcerer, 07:01
Re: Still to this day, an integer divide by zero aborts the application ! ?, Sven Hesse, 06:58
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Sorcerer, 06:56
Dee Dee: 24 years old, long red hair, a pirate/genius/whore/virgin., Jeff…Relf, 06:54
Re: The number 1 is not enough to convey: X / X = 100 percent of X., Sven Hesse, 06:48
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 06:47
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, ianparker2, 06:32
Re: Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Richard Schultz, 06:29
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., ABarlow, 06:15
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 05:59
Re: Still to this day, an integer divide by zero aborts the application ! ?, jmfbahciv, 05:18
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 05:17
Re: How about a single-electron laser?, jmfbahciv, 05:05
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., jmfbahciv, 05:02
Re: Materialism is nihilism, Ben Newsam, 05:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 05:01
Uncle Al, the competition has beaten you 100%!, Jan Panteltje, 04:55
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., T Wake, 04:46
Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Bob Cain, 04:41
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 04:39
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 04:39
use quantum mechanics to explain Relativity, johnson, 04:35
Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Bob Cain, 04:31
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Bob Cain, 04:26
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 04:24
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Bob Cain, 04:05
Re: NASA declines to protect the Planet Earth, Ben Newsam, 04:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 04:01
E=mc^2 begot from 1/2mv^2,easy and simple; Jewish religion stealing of Mileva Maric; attention please Michael Getler, PBS ombudsman, a_plutonium, 03:26
Re: Materialism is nihilism, Robert Kopp, 03:13
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, mmeron, 03:00
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, jt64, 02:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, jt64, 02:30
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues, OsherD, 02:12
Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Lostgallifreyan, 02:07
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues, OsherD, 01:56
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., JanPB, 01:55
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues, OsherD, 01:48
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.2: Time-Dependent Eigenvalues, OsherD, 01:38
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, jt64, 01:38
Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, blair . houghton, 01:36
Re: Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, george, 01:27
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 00:37
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Y.Porat, 00:23
Melted column 9/11 conspiracy proof or not?, mike3, 00:19
Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Sven Geier, 00:18

July 24, 2006

Re: Why tethered electrons?, Edward Green, 23:35
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.2: Time-Dependent Eigenvalues, john Mrtiy, 22:55
Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., raider.adam, 22:18
Re: God is pure, Morpheal, 22:07
Re: How big is the refraction index of flowing water?, will1, 22:01
Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., Phil Holman, 21:55
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Edward Green, 21:39
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:31
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 21:26
Re: how many stars are there of which you are not certain nor aware?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:23
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:21
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:20
Re: How about a single-electron laser?, GPG, 21:18
Re: How about a single-electron laser?, Phat Bytestard, 21:15
Re: How about a single-electron laser?, tapwater, 21:07
Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Phat Bytestard, 21:05
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:58
Re: Why tethered electrons?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 20:57
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Tom Roberts, 20:54
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 20:53
Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Sam Wormley, 20:51
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:28
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 20:02
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, T Wake, 20:00
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 19:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 19:40
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 18:54
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 18:36
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 18:32
Re: how many stars are there of which you are not certain nor aware?, Proginoskes, 18:30
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 18:15
Re: A new, physics-based approach to analyzing simple games, Proginoskes, 18:04
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 17:42
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Edward Green, 17:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, puppet_sock, 17:22
Re: How about a single-electron laser?, tadchem, 17:12
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 16:58
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 16:50
Re: Phenomalism, mmeron, 16:46
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 16:40
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 16:38
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 16:37
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 16:32
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Steve Willner, 16:31
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:26
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 16:25
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 16:12
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, dlzc, 16:00
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:58
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Randy Poe, 15:41
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 15:37
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., tomgee, 15:32
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., tomgee, 15:27
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, T Wake, 15:19
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 15:08
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:01
Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, uri, 14:56
Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Sorcerer, 14:52
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, T Wake, 14:51
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.2: Time-Dependent Eigenvalues, OsherD, 14:49
Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., Randy Poe, 14:19
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.1: Loop Quantum Gravity Contradicts Itself and Opens The Way for "Non-Euclidean" Dynamics, Mr Cheese, 14:15
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.1: Loop Quantum Gravity Contradicts Itself and Opens The Way for "Non-Euclidean" Dynamics, Mr Cheese, 14:15
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Ian Parker, 14:13
Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., raider.adam, 13:57
Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., raider.adam, 13:49
Re: Gravitational Doppler, Lester Zick, 13:35
Re: selfishness, T Wake, 13:28
Re: selfishness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:24
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, Ben Newsam, 13:22
Re: selfishness, T Wake, 13:18
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., surrealistic-dream, 13:16
Re: selfishness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:13
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 13:09
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Igor, 13:06
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Rich Grise, 13:03
Re: force vs power, joe_avery_2005, 13:02
Re: selfishness, T Wake, 13:00
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., mmeron, 12:52
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 12:51
Re: selfishness, Igor, 12:47
Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Rich Grise, 12:46
Re: selfishness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:44
Re: How are single-atom lasers pumped?, Rich Grise, 12:44
Re: Phenomalism, Igor, 12:27
Re: Phenomalism, Igor, 12:24
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 12:16
Re: Gravitational Doppler, george, 12:11
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, cnctut, 12:10
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Bob Myers, 12:05
Re: selfishness, T Wake, 11:58
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, T Wake, 11:57
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 11:53
Re: If God were truly pure..., T Wake, 11:53
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Ocham, 11:53
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, T Wake, 11:52
Re: selfishness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:49
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, T Wake, 11:49
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Ocham, 11:40
Re: How big is the refraction index of flowing water?, Sam Wormley, 11:36
Re: selfishness, T Wake, 11:35
Re: If God were truly pure..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:34
Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., T Wake, 11:34
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 11:29
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 11:27
back ground radiation, kurtstocklmeir, 11:23
"Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Eht, 11:23
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 11:22
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 11:21
Re: Potential of Frequency as unifying measurment?, brian . zeligson, 11:15
If God were truly pure..., Jeff…Relf, 11:10
Re: Potential of Frequency as unifying measurment?, brian . zeligson, 11:03
How big is the refraction index of flowing water?, PhadaMasci, 10:52
Re: Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Richard Herring, 10:49
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Y.Porat, 10:22
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 10:20
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:19
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:18
Re: SU(2), Mark L. Fergerson, 10:17
Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, Ben Newsam, 10:13
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:12
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Y.Porat, 10:11
Re: Still to this day, an integer divide by zero aborts the application ! ?, Ben Newsam, 10:05
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 10:01
Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Y.Porat, 09:58
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Richard Herring, 09:45
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Richard Herring, 09:33
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., jem, 09:25
Re: How about a single-electron laser?, GPG, 09:22
Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Andy Resnick, 09:21
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:18
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 09:10
Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., Andy Resnick, 09:07
Re: Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:53
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:52
Re: Gravitational Doppler, J.A. Legris, 08:48
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., jem, 08:41
Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match, consumption..., Jeff…Relf, 08:38
Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, PD, 08:23
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 08:11
Re: Still to this day, an integer divide by zero aborts the application ! ?, Randy Poe, 08:09
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 08:03
Does God want us to fly to Malaga?, Ocham, 07:52
Re: Still to this day, an integer divide by zero aborts the application ! ?, jmfbahciv, 07:50
Re: How about a single-electron laser?, Karim Lenhard, 07:50
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:48
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:46
Re: apparent paradox with charges, Greg Neill, 07:42
Re: how many stars are there of which you are not certain nor aware?, Robert J. Kolker, 07:35
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., jmfbahciv, 07:33
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:30
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:21
Re: selfishness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:19
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:19
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:16
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:15
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:15
Re: selfishness, uri, 07:14
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:14
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:11
Re: Not_a_Number times anything equals Not_a_Number., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:09
Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, Ben Newsam, 07:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:05
Re: > > http://www.beyond-science.com/sigma.jpg http://www.beyond-science.com/index.html http://www.beyond-science.com/chess.jpg are the best and his website put out allot of numbers, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:04
Re: The unitless number 2.5 is merely _Part_ of the story., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:04
Re: Not_a_Number times anything equals Not_a_Number., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:03
Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, Sorcerer, 07:02
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 06:55
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 06:52
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 06:49
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., PD, 06:43
Re: Is there a formula that "explains" the universe?, PD, 06:38
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., jmfbahciv, 05:59
Re: Three basic questions, tadchem, 05:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 04:59
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 04:52
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 04:38
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Harry, 04:33
Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, Y.Porat, 04:25
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Harry, 04:25
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 04:19
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 03:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 03:48
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, T Wake, 03:46
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 03:45
Re: Puddle_Duck asserts he's travelling through time ( randomly ? )., T Wake, 03:44
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 03:42
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 03:41
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 03:34
Gravitational Doppler, Lester Zick, 03:34
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 03:22
Re: The unitless number 2.5 is merely _Part_ of the story., T Wake, 03:21
Re: Ratios, MicroSoft C++ 8.0 and pure insanity., T Wake, 03:20
Re: Not_a_Number times anything equals Not_a_Number., T Wake, 03:19
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 03:16
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., mmeron, 03:13
Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.1: Loop Quantum Gravity Contradicts Itself and Opens The Way for "Non-Euclidean" Dynamics, OsherD, 03:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 02:51
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.1: Loop Quantum Gravity Contradicts Itself and Opens The Way for "Non-Euclidean" Dynamics, OsherD, 02:43
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 02:39
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Timo Nieminen, 02:32
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Koobee Wublee, 02:20
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism"., Bill Hobba, 02:07
Re: How about a single-electron laser?, jimfoo, 01:28

July 23, 2006

10 secs / 4 secs = 250 percent of 4 secs., Jeff…Relf, 11:12
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, nicked, 11:10
Re: The number 1 is not enough to convey: X / X = 100 percent of X., mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 11:07
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Juan Tootreego, 11:02
The number 1 is not enough to convey: X / X = 100 percent of X., Jeff…Relf, 10:58
Potential of Frequency as unifying measurment?, brian . zeligson, 10:57
Re: Neutrons, Greg Hansen, 10:56
Potential of Frequency as unifying measurment?, brian . zeligson, 10:45
The number 1 is not enough to convey: X / X = 100 percent of X., Jeff…Relf, 10:45
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jimp, 10:45
Re: Phenomalism, WPR, 10:32
Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, hetware, 10:21
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 10:21
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 10:19
Re: The orbital speed of Sirius_A around Sirius_B., Art Deco, 10:12
Re: Puddle_Duck asserts he's travelling through time ( randomly ? )., Art Deco, 10:10
Re: Phenomalism, Insomniac, 10:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 10:05
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 10:01
Re: Phenomalism, uri, 09:52
Re: apparent paradox with charges, Greg Neill, 09:29
Re: Phenomalism, ilya_shambat2004, 09:22
Re: The orbital speed of Sirius_A around Sirius_B., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:05
Re: Puddle_Duck asserts he's travelling through time ( randomly ? )., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:05
Re: Phenomalism, Milan, 09:04
��j�s�Ѱ|, Verrine Hsu, 09:00
Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, Ben Newsam, 08:54
Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, Ben Newsam, 08:52
Re: Phenomalism, uri, 08:52
Re: Ionizing Fans, Sorcerer, 08:51
Puddle_Duck asserts he's travelling through time ( randomly ? )., Jeff…Relf, 08:50
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 08:50
Re: Phenomalism, tadchem, 08:48
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Sorcerer, 08:46
Re: Phenomalism, mikegordge, 08:41
Re: apparent paradox with charges, srp, 08:39
Re: HOW EINSTEIN SHOULD HAVE RESOLVED THE TWIN PARADOX, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:33
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 08:30
The orbital speed of Sirius_A around Sirius_B., Jeff…Relf, 08:29
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 08:26
"The Arrow of Time", Tde, 08:19
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 08:17
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:13
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:12
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:10
Re: When will world petroleum be exhausted?, jmfbahciv, 07:55
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:53
Re: Phenomalism, Sir Frederick, 07:51
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jmfbahciv, 07:49
Uncle_Al, how's Win_98 working out for you ?, Jeff…Relf, 07:49
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:47
Re: Patinha being with me (PD becomes a joker), T Wake, 07:35
Virtual Phonon and Superconductivity, tontoko, 07:35
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 07:32
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 07:31
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 07:30
Re: Patinha being with me (PD becomes a joker), Y.Porat, 07:30
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 07:26
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 07:24
Re: Girls just want to have fun., T Wake, 07:11
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:07
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 06:57
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 06:49
Phenomalism, uri, 06:20
Re: what's the point of conservation laws without perpetuum mobile second class (100% efficiency), dedanoe, 06:16
Re: Animism versus nihilism, tadchem, 06:08
Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, jmfbahciv, 06:03
Help with math problem, William Hightower, 05:19
Re: REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM, Ben Newsam, 05:00
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 05:00
Water And Nan electronics Will Mix To Create Ultra-dense Memory Storage Devices., studiescircle, 04:22
'average driver has 1 crash per 1 million miles.'ONE NEWS.22/7/06., don . lotto, 04:16
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 04:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 04:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 04:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 04:09
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 03:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 03:57
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 03:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 03:40
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 03:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Golden Boar, 03:23
Re: Ionizing Fans, The Ghost In The Machine, 03:00
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 02:11
Audio Recording, TRIXSH, 02:10
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Jim Black, 01:26
Re: Animism versus nihilism, G. L. Bradford, 01:02
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Y.Porat, 00:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:19
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 00:15
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 00:12
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 00:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:01

July 22, 2006

Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 23:53
Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., Greg Neill, 23:47
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 23:40
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 23:40
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 23:30
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Azure, 23:18
FINAL SOLUTION ALERT: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 23:11
Re: Girls just want to have fun., Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:49
how many stars are there of which you are not certain nor aware?, dedanoe, 22:43
Girls just want to have fun., Jeff…Relf, 22:43
Re: Three basic questions, malibu, 22:37
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 22:26
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 22:23
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 22:19
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 22:19
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 22:17
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 22:17
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 22:16
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 22:15
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 22:14
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 22:08
Re: There is a God!, T Wake, 22:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:03
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 22:03
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 22:02
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:00
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 21:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 21:56
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:53
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 21:52
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 21:50
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 21:47
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 21:46
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 21:46
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 21:45
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 21:44
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 21:43
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:33
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 21:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:31
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:28
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 21:25
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 21:24
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:15
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:13
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:12
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:10
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, RadicalLibertarian, 21:09
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:08
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:03
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bill Snyder, 20:57
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:51
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:48
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:48
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:45
Re: There is a God!, uri, 20:36
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Juan Tootreego, 20:35
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, tadchem, 20:34
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:33
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:31
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 84.0: Quantum Gravity and Contact Transformations/Manifolds and Wrapping/Winding, Mr Cheese, 20:29
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:24
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bookman, 20:23
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:20
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:20
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 84.0: Quantum Gravity and Contact Transformations/Manifolds and Wrapping/Winding, Mr Cheese, 20:17
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:14
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:10
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 20:08
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 20:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:05
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 19:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:55
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 19:52
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 19:34
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:28
Re: momentum of dipole, Edward Green, 19:27
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:26
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:26
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bill Snyder, 19:25
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 19:23
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 19:22
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 19:22
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Mr Cheese, 19:21
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Sue..., 19:16
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Lostgallifreyan, 19:15
Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., raider.adam, 19:13
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 19:13
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 19:09
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, hetware, 18:39
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, carlip-nospam, 18:35
Re: Neutrons, mmeron, 18:35
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 18:33
Re: Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., Sam Wormley, 18:29
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Sorcerer, 18:25
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Sorcerer, 18:25
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:22
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 18:20
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, RadicalLibertarian, 18:18
Projectile Motion problem. Looking for advice., raider.adam, 18:14
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, jstevh, 18:09
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 18:05
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Ben Newsam, 17:52
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Sjouke Burry, 17:51
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 17:49
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 17:47
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Rock Brentwood, 17:47
Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., Edward Green, 17:33
Re: GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., T Wake, 17:26
Re: Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit or NOT!, T Wake, 17:24
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Edward Green, 17:22
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 17:19
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Edward Green, 17:12
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, tadchem, 17:12
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Hagar, 17:00
Re: Neutrons, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:56
Re: apparent paradox with charges, Edward Green, 16:49
Re: Three basic questions, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:40
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 16:35
Re: Neutrons, Randy Poe, 16:20
Re: Neutrons, Sam Wormley, 16:19
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, jshsucks, 16:17
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 84.0: Quantum Gravity and Contact Transformations/Manifolds and Wrapping/Winding, OsherD, 16:16
Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., PD, 16:09
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:03
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 84.0: Quantum Gravity and Contact Transformations/Manifolds and Wrapping/Winding, OsherD, 16:00
Re: force vs power, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, hetware, 15:57
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 15:56
Neutrons, Bob, 15:52
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, jstevh, 15:45
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Juan Tootreego, 15:23
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Juan Tootreego, 15:21
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:15
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 15:11
Re: Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit or NOT!, Ben Newsam, 15:11
Re: Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit or NOT!, Ben Newsam, 15:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 15:07
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:49
Re: GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:48
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:46
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Rich Grise, 14:29
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 14:19
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Attuarii, 14:18
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 14:15
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 14:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:57
Re: No 100 thousand dollar prize for Ben_Newsam., T Wake, 13:54
Re: GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., T Wake, 13:53
Re: apparent paradox with charges, Randy Poe, 13:52
Re: GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., T Wake, 13:51
Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., T Wake, 13:47
Re: Patinha is just having as much fun as she can... who isn't ?, T Wake, 13:46
Re: Patinha is no charity case., T Wake, 13:46
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, rusty, 13:41
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:41
Re: Three basic questions, Jan Panteltje, 13:40
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:37
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:33
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:29
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:26
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:20
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:18
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:17
Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., CyrilGrey, 13:12
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:08
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:03
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:02
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 12:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 12:55
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 12:52
Re: apparent paradox with charges, tadchem, 12:51
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, tadchem, 12:47
Re: Three basic questions, Sorcerer, 12:39
Re: Three basic questions, Sorcerer, 12:36
Re: what's the point of conservation laws without perpetuum mobile second class (100% efficiency), Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:36
Re: Three basic questions, tadchem, 12:22
what's the point of conservation laws without perpetuum mobile second class (100% efficiency), dedanoe, 12:18
Re: force vs power, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:13
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Bill Snyder, 12:08
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:59
Re: Mathematicians routinely lie, Sam Wormley, 11:51
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 11:50
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 11:37
Mathematicians routinely lie, jstevh, 11:27
Re: force vs power, Matifx, 11:11
Re: force vs power, Matifx, 11:07
Girls just want to have fun., Jeff…Relf, 10:46
No 100 thousand dollar prize for Ben_Newsam., Jeff…Relf, 10:40
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 10:37
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:35
Re: Rigid body simulation, wdflannery, 10:33
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 10:28
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, John Christiansen, 10:14
Re: Rigid body simulation, John C . Polasek, 10:08
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 10:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 10:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 10:01
Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, marika, 09:46
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 09:44
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 09:38
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 09:29
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 09:27
Re: Three basic questions, Jan Panteltje, 09:27
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 09:26
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:05
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 09:03
apparent paradox with charges, Sery, 09:00
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 08:56
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, tadchem, 08:50
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:40
Re: Clarification, Sam Wormley, 08:36
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 08:33
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:32
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 08:25
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 08:25
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 08:24
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:20
Re: GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:19
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:18
Re: Three basic questions, tadchem, 08:16
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:15
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:14
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:12
Re: Patinha is just having as much fun as she can... who isn't ?, Bill Snyder, 08:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Greg Neill, 08:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bill Snyder, 08:06
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 08:02
Re: GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., Ben Newsam, 07:50
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 07:49
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:46
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 07:45
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Lloyd Parker, 07:25
"The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Tde, 07:10
GR's relativistic mass, time dilation and length contraction., Jeff…Relf, 07:00
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 06:48
Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, jmfbahciv, 06:39
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bookman, 06:30
Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 06:22
Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 21 July 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Jan Panteltje, 06:22
Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., Jan Panteltje, 06:16
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 06:10
Re: Three basic questions, Sue..., 04:56
Re: Rigid body simulation, Ben Newsam, 04:45
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 04:42
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 04:37
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 04:23
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 04:22
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 04:16
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 04:14
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bookman, 04:09
Re: Watch Your Speed, Ben Newsam, 04:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 04:04
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 04:00
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 03:46
Re: Animism versus nihilism, tadchem, 03:36
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Lostgallifreyan, 03:31
Re: Materialism is nihilism, tadchem, 03:22
Re: Clarification, Jim Black, 03:17
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bookman, 02:52
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bookman, 02:46
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 02:13
Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., Y.Porat, 02:13
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Y.Porat, 02:05
Patinha is just having as much fun as she can... who isn't ?, Jeff…Relf, 02:03
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 01:34
Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 01:30
Rigid body simulation, tavianator, 01:26
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 01:19
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 01:16
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 01:00
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:41
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:31
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 00:12
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 00:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:06
Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., Edward Green, 00:03
Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., Edward Green, 00:02
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:02
A new, physics-based approach to analyzing simple games, Sam Wormley, 00:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 00:00

July 21, 2006

Optical atomic clock beats world standard, Sam Wormley, 23:59
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 23:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 23:56
Electrons and such, cnctut, 23:52
Electrons and such, cnctut, 23:52
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 23:47
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 23:31
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Attuarii, 23:23
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 23:17
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 23:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 23:10
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:01
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 22:56
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Ed Otto, 22:54
Re: force of a kite, John C . Polasek, 22:46
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Attuarii, 22:42
Re: Matter decay and black holes, noshellswill, 22:30
Organic transistors act as sensors, Sam Wormley, 22:20
Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 22:15
Re: Sturcture of an atom, S. Enterprize Company, 22:12
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Eeyore, 22:08
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 21:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:57
Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 21:57
Re: Question about Black Holes, Sam Wormley, 21:54
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 21 July 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 21:44
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 21:43
Re: Question about Black Holes, Ben Newsam, 21:41
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 21:34
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 21:28
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jimp, 21:25
Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, Phat Bytestard, 21:20
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 21:16
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Edward Green, 21:14
Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., Jeff…Relf, 21:14
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 21:09
Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 21:05
Patinha is no charity case., Jeff…Relf, 21:04
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 21:02
Re: Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 20:55
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 20:43
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 20:39
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 20:37
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 20:35
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 20:32
Re: Question about Black Holes, mmeron, 20:29
Re: force of a kite, cnctut, 20:29
Re: Question about Black Holes, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:27
Re: Why tethered electrons?, Edward Green, 20:26
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 20:25
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jimp, 20:25
Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 20:23
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 20:23
Re: Asteroid impact temperature & pressure, radiation, mike3, 20:20
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 20:20
Re: Matter decay and black holes, mike3, 20:17
Re: Question about Black Holes, Ben Newsam, 19:58
Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 19:58
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 19:50
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Rich Grise, 19:50
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Rich Grise, 19:47
Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 19:45
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, R Philip Dowds, 19:44
Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 19:43
Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, riplin, 19:36
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jimp, 19:35
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 19:33
Re: Watch Your Speed, Randy Poe, 19:15
Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 19:15
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 19:01
Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 18:57
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jimp, 18:45
Acoustic wave propogation through moving air., Mook Johnson, 18:42
Re: New look for graphene (Jul 20), Uncle Al, 18:05
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:44
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 21 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 17:42
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bookman, 17:35
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, CoreyWhite, 17:16
Re: MUTUALLY INDEPENDENT velocity vectors?, Hero, 17:06
Re: momentum of dipole, Jim Black, 17:01
Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 16:55
Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 16:55
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 16:51
Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, jimp, 16:45
Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 16:41
Re: Question about Black Holes, Jim Black, 16:39
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 16:31
Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 16:29
Re: Watch Your Speed, riplin, 16:22
Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., PD, 16:21
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, T Wake, 16:19
Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, riplin, 16:13
Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., cnctut, 16:13
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Ben Newsam, 16:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 16:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 16:11
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, CoreyWhite, 16:05
Re: momentum of dipole, mmeron, 15:58
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:54
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, T Wake, 15:53
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, T Wake, 15:52
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, edconrad, 15:51
Re: Three basic questions, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:50
Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., T Wake, 15:49
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:45
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Pat B., 15:43
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Golden Boar, 15:38
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Igor, 15:34
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:15
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 15:13
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:08
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, CoreyWhite, 15:06
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Beemer, 15:04
Re: force of a kite, Sam Wormley, 15:03
force of a kite, tekhneek, 14:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 14:50
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 14:42
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 14:35
Re: Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., Randy Poe, 14:32
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 14:31
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 14:28
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 14:25
Patinha being with me ( teasing me ) is a total accident., Jeff…Relf, 14:24
Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., T Wake, 14:09
momentum of dipole, Sery, 14:05
Re: Three basic questions, jimp, 14:05
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, T Wake, 14:04
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, T Wake, 14:00
Re: Patinha makes me face my harsh reality., PD, 13:56
Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., uri, 13:42
Re: Patinha makes me face my harsh reality., T Wake, 13:41
Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., Igor, 13:37
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 13:37
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:36
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:35
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:34
Re: Materialism is nihilism, Igor, 13:32
Re: Three basic questions, Newton Wasp, 13:30
Re: Three basic questions, Newton Wasp, 13:30
Re: Three basic questions, Newton Wasp, 13:30
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:28
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:25
Re: If a God created you..., T Wake, 13:24
Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., T Wake, 13:23
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bill Snyder, 13:13
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 13:03
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, mmeron, 12:52
Re: Three basic questions, Sam Wormley, 12:49
Re: Why tethered electrons?, Igor, 12:37
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Damon Hill, 12:36
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Beemer, 12:33
Re: The psychology of creation myths, mmeron, 12:29
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Ken S. Tucker, 12:28
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Corey, 12:25
just a little briefing, dedanoe, 12:16
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jimp, 12:15
Re: Three basic questions, Sam Wormley, 12:09
Re: Patinha makes me face my harsh reality., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:56
Re: Relativistic Quantum field theories., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:52
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:50
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:48
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:45
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:44
Re: SU(2), Edward Green, 11:44
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:42
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:39
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:39
Re: SU(2), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:38
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Beemer, 11:36
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Beemer, 11:33
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:33
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:31
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 11:31
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:30
Re: Why tethered electrons?, Edward Green, 11:25
Re: Three basic questions, jimp, 11:25
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, jimp, 11:25
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 11:24
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:17
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, briggs, 11:17
Re: Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, smallpond, 11:15
Re: Three basic questions, Sue..., 11:11
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:02
"The Einstein Hoax", Tde, 10:57
"The Einstein Hoax", Tde, 10:57
Question about immersed fluid filled vessel, Beemer, 10:57
Patinha makes me face my harsh reality., Jeff…Relf, 10:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 09:43
Re: Everyone is Patinha's fool., Bill Snyder, 09:41
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 87.41: The Cozmik Drival Continues on and on ......., Dr.Kooper, 09:41
Re: Clarification, Sam Wormley, 09:40
Re: Why can't humans live in much hotter/colder environments ?, T Wake, 09:37
Re: Answering the question, " Does God exist ? "., T Wake, 09:36
Re: Everyone is Patinha's fool., T Wake, 09:35
Re: What a penniless Geek/Geezer I am !, T Wake, 09:35
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 09:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 09:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 09:31
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 09:29
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 09:29
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 09:25
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 09:24
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 09:20
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 09:18
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 09:14
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 09:13
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 09:12
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Lloyd Parker, 09:07
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 09:05
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 09:04
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 09:03
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 08:59
Relativistic Quantum field theories., Jeff…Relf, 08:57
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 08:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 08:53
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 08:50
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 08:49
If a God created you..., Jeff…Relf, 08:47
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 08:45
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 08:44
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 08:43
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 08:43
Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., PD, 08:42
Everyone is Patinha's fool., Jeff…Relf, 08:39
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 08:37
Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., uri, 08:30
Re: What a penniless Geek/Geezer I am !, PD, 08:24
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 08:19
Re: Are black holes time-dilated Supernovae/White_Holes ?, JoeT, 08:12
Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Harry, 08:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, briggs, 08:09
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 07:53
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 07:44
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 07:40
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 07:35
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 07:32
Re: Coulomb's law, Greg Neill, 07:26
What a penniless Geek/Geezer I am !, Jeff…Relf, 07:14
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:00
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 06:58
Three basic questions, Newton Wasp, 06:47
Re: Coulomb's law, Henning Makholm, 06:38
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 06:37
Clarification, Diana, 06:36
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Jan Panteltje, 06:23
Re: Animism versus nihilism, G. L. Bradford, 06:22
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 06:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 06:11
Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, Ben Newsam, 06:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 06:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 06:11
Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., tadchem, 05:33
Re: Hack the Mirror, Sue..., 05:28
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Y.Porat, 05:21
Re: Hack the Mirror, Y.Porat, 05:18
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Y.Porat, 05:17
Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Y.Porat, 05:12
First stone for biggest solar power plant ever., Jan Panteltje, 05:11
Re: The psychology of creation myths, jmfbahciv, 05:09
Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, jmfbahciv, 05:06
Re: derivation of velocity formula for tense string, CWatters, 04:50
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Cranks Reply, 03:53
Re: Hack the Mirror, Cranks Reply, 03:51
Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Cranks Reply, 03:44
Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Cranks Reply, 03:43
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 03:38
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Sue..., 03:35
Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Sue..., 03:24
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 03:16
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 03:13
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 03:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 03:03
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 03:00
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 02:56
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 02:47
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., tadchem, 02:45
entropy is a subset of Ampere-Maxwell law Re: 10^120 to tile Universe & gravity 10^40, a_plutonium, 02:44
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 02:43
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 02:39
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, tadchem, 02:37
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 01:50
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 01:42
Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 01:40
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 01:34
Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 01:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 01:32
derivation of velocity formula for tense string, Wendy E. McCaughrin, 01:19
Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Y.Porat, 01:10
Re: Why tethered electrons?, Y.Porat, 00:40
Re: MUTUALLY INDEPENDENT velocity vectors?, Sam Wormley, 00:33
Re: Planets 'capturing' an object, Sam Wormley, 00:32
New look for graphene (Jul 20), Sam Wormley, 00:27
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 00:13

July 20, 2006

Re: Materialism is nihilism, noshellswill, 23:57
Re: Materialism is nihilism, noshellswill, 23:46
Why can't humans live in much hotter/colder environments ?, Jeff…Relf, 23:45
Re: Materialism is nihilism, noshellswill, 23:39
Answering the question, " Does God exist ? "., Jeff…Relf, 23:39
Re: Planets 'capturing' an object, mmeron, 23:33
Re: Why tethered electrons?, China Man, 23:28
We're still in a tech-bust and I expect it will bottom out around 2015., Jeff…Relf, 23:23
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, RadicalLibertarian, 23:21
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Edward Green, 23:13
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 23:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 23:08
Re: Planets 'capturing' an object, Randy Poe, 23:05
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 22:58
Why tethered electrons?, Edward Green, 22:48
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 22:47
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 22:42
Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, MadDogR75, 22:39
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, RadicalLibertarian, 22:37
Planets 'capturing' an object, Dan in Philly, 22:30
Re: WHO KILLED PHYSICS: CLAUSIUS OR EINSTEIN?, Timo Nieminen, 22:21
Re: MUTUALLY INDEPENDENT velocity vectors?, Scott J. McCaughrin, 22:03
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 22:00
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:51
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, srp, 21:50
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:49
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:41
Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, Phat Bytestard, 21:37
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 21:37
Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., uri, 21:28
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 21:27
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Hagar, 21:25
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 21:17
Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:16
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 21:11
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, Corey, 21:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 20:51
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 20:39
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 20:34
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Randy Poe, 20:29
Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 20:26
Re: Arthur Kornberg, tadchem, 20:24
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 20:23
Re: We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, tadchem, 20:17
Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Sue..., 20:15
Re: Animism versus nihilism, tadchem, 20:13
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 20:02
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, tadchem, 20:02
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 19:59
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 19:37
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 19:28
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Sue..., 19:24
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 19:20
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 19:16
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 19:14
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Timo Nieminen, 19:02
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 19:02
Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, PD, 18:51
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:48
Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Sorcerer, 18:42
Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Sorcerer, 18:42
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 18:41
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 18:36
Re: is entropy the Faraday law analog or the Ampere law analog Re:, QncyMI, 18:35
Re: Materialism is nihilism, fernbach1948, 18:34
Re: Materialism is nihilism, T Wake, 18:32
Re: God's retards., T Wake, 18:32
We Are In The Wall Street Journal Now!!!, CoreyWhite, 18:25
Re: is entropy the Faraday law analog or the Ampere law analog Re:, QncyMI, 18:24
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Sorcerer, 18:23
Re: Materialism is nihilism, fernbach1948, 18:23
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 18:20
Re: Materialism is nihilism, fernbach1948, 18:20
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, srp, 18:18
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 18:18
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:02
Re: Arthur Kornberg, bloodIce . spelled, 18:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:54
Re: Matter decay and black holes, Sam Wormley, 17:36
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, srp, 17:29
Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 17:28
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:27
Re: God's retards., Edward Green, 17:26
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 17:25
Re: Coulomb's law, Edward Green, 17:24
Matter decay and black holes, mike3, 17:21
Re: Materialism is nihilism, Igor, 17:10
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:46
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:42
Re: Asteroid impact temperature & pressure, radiation, mmeron, 16:38
Re: God's retards., tadchem, 16:30
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, tadchem, 16:23
Re: Asteroid impact temperature & pressure, radiation, Sam Wormley, 16:14
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 16:05
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Sue..., 16:00
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 15:58
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Hagar, 15:56
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 15:54
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 15:50
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Brad Guth, 15:42
Re: Asteroid impact temperature & pressure, radiation, mike3, 15:41
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 15:40
Re: Light and the Quantum Jump, Jan Panteltje, 15:32
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 15:24
Re: It's all just smoke & mirrors, Bob Cain, 15:21
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 15:18
Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, Andy Resnick, 15:15
Re: Arthur Kornberg, Andy Resnick, 15:13
Light and the Quantum Jump, Bob Cain, 15:09
Arthur Kornberg, bloodIce . spelled, 14:49
Re: Are black holes time-dilated Supernovae/White_Holes ?, T Wake, 14:46
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, Greg Neill, 14:39
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 14:23
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 14:14
Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, smallpond, 14:13
Are black holes time-dilated Supernovae/White_Holes ?, Jeff…Relf, 14:11
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., PD, 14:06
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, donstockbauer, 14:05
Re: Shuttle Orbit Questions, PD, 13:57
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, cnctut, 13:55
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 13:48
Re: Physics is dead!, T Wake, 13:44
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, The Real Chris, 13:43
Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, T Wake, 13:42
Shuttle Orbit Questions, Robert11, 13:41
Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:39
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:39
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:37
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 13:35
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 13:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:30
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Edward Green, 13:30
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:28
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:24
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:22
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:21
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 13:13
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Richard Herring, 13:12
"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Tde, 13:11
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Tde, 13:09
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Igor, 12:43
Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Edward Green, 12:32
Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Y.Porat, 12:28
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, srp, 12:15
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, uri, 12:07
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 12:03
Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 12:02
Re: Materialism is nihilism, T Wake, 11:57
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Hagar, 11:57
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 11:56
Re: Gaining control., T Wake, 11:52
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:50
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:49
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:46
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 11:33
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 11:33
Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, PD, 11:32
Re: DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, donstockbauer, 11:31
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Richard Herring, 11:30
Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, Jeff…Relf, 11:05
Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 10:55
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, lucasea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 10:42
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Mark Fortune, 10:40
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 10:25
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 10:07
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 09:35
Re: Animism versus nihilism, smallpond, 09:31
Re: SU(2), Lee Rudolph, 09:16
Re: SU(2), Edward Green, 08:57
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 08:27
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 07:58
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 07:38
Re: Materialism is nihilism, john fernbach, 07:34
DRESS REHEARSAL -- First Men on the Moon, Ed Conrad, 07:23
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 07:23
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), G. L. Bradford, 06:53
Re: doomsday strategy based on self-field theory, tony fleming, 06:48
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 06:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 06:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 06:28
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 06:25
Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 06:13
Re: The psychology of creation myths, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:00
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 05:58
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:49
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Y.Porat, 05:18
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jmfbahciv, 05:16
Re: force vs power, Mike, 04:49
Re: force vs power, Mike, 04:43
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, The Real Chris, 04:37
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bob Cain, 04:35
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Richard Herring, 04:35
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, The Real Chris, 04:32
Re: doomsday strategy based on self-field theory, Cranks Reply, 04:19
Re: It's all just smoke & mirrors, Cranks Reply, 04:11
Re: God's retards., Cranks Reply, 03:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 03:56
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 03:24
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 03:19
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 03:15
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 03:14
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 03:10
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 03:09
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Brian Fletcher, 03:09
Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 03:04
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 02:54
doomsday strategy based on self-field theory, tony fleming, 02:48
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 02:45
Re: SU(2), Paul Abbott, 02:44
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 02:41
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Bill Ward, 02:33
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 02:08
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 02:05
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 02:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 01:51
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 01:30
Re: SU(2), James Dolan, 01:27
Re: Gaining control., Bill Snyder, 00:22
Gaining control., Jeff…Relf, 00:14
God's retards., Jeff…Relf, 00:01

July 19, 2006

Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 23:35
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 23:14
Re: Asteroid impact temperature & pressure, radiation, Sam Wormley, 23:07
Re: The psychology of creation myths, Henning Makholm, 23:06
Re: Coulomb's law, Henning Makholm, 23:01
Asteroid impact temperature & pressure, radiation, mike3, 22:42
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 22:23
Pebble: a nearly round object with a near-Gaussian distribution of curvatures, Sam Wormley, 22:20
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 22:19
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Phat Bytestard, 22:15
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, lucasea, 22:09
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Greg Hansen, 21:40
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 21:39
Custom-made Fiber Bragg Grating, Viki, 21:35
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, C what I mean, 21:32
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Eeyore, 21:23
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Sergey, 21:20
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 20:59
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Radium, 20:58
VVFWS NOMINATION: Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 20:55
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 20:37
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 20:27
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 20:24
Re: Geomagnetic field reason, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:15
Re: The psychology of creation myths, Edward Green, 20:01
Re: SU(2), Edward Green, 19:49
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 19:33
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 19:27
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PerfectlyAble, 19:15
Re: 10^120 to tile Universe & gravity 10^40 Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 19:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 19:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 19:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 19:08
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 19:07
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 19:07
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 19:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 19:01
Re: Relative motion from individual motion, Ben Newsam, 19:00
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, uri, 18:59
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:58
Re: Hack the Mirror, tadchem, 18:57
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:55
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:52
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:47
Re: Help with math problum, John Schutkeker, 18:47
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:41
Re: Nuclear bomb design., tadchem, 18:40
Re: Geomagnetic field reason, John Schutkeker, 18:30
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, tadchem, 18:28
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:27
Re: 32381,97 Hz, John Schutkeker, 18:24
Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 18:18
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 18:05
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 18:04
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:01
Re: Coulomb's law, tadchem, 17:56
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 17:55
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 17:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:53
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Tron, 17:51
Re: Rich pigs, good... poor pigs, bad ? !, T Wake, 17:51
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:47
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 17:46
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 17:42
Rich pigs, good... poor pigs, bad ? !, Jeff…Relf, 17:38
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:37
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:16
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, mmeron, 17:14
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 16:49
Re: The psychology of creation myths, Peter, 16:45
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 16:17
Re: Materialism is nihilism, T Wake, 16:12
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Morpheus, 15:49
Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 15:33
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, PD, 15:26
Re: Animism versus nihilism, smallpond, 15:26
Re: Materialism is nihilism, PD, 15:22
Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., PD, 15:18
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Tron, 15:08
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 14:51
10^120 to tile Universe & gravity 10^40 Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force, a_plutonium, 14:38
Re: Objects/Humans moving very close to c., Bill Snyder, 14:15
Re: Objects/Humans moving very close to c., T Wake, 14:08
Re: There is no beginning and every rock eventually gets dissipated., T Wake, 14:06
Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., T Wake, 14:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 14:04
Re: Nuclear bomb design., Igor, 14:03
Re: Who was Satan incarnate ( thus infinitely stupid ) ?, Morpheus, 13:56
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 13:53
Re: Paying Taxes/Rent., T Wake, 13:51
Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 13:48
Re: Who was Satan incarnate ( thus infinitely stupid ) ?, T Wake, 13:48
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 13:46
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 13:41
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 13:40
Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 13:39
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Morpheus, 13:38
Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 13:30
Re: Animism versus nihilism, uri, 13:22
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 13:21
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, cnctut, 13:19
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, Igor, 13:10
Re: Coulomb's law, Henning Makholm, 12:54
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, STEVE ROBERTS, 12:52
Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 12:47
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, Greg Neill, 12:47
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 12:46
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Igor, 12:43
Re: Watch Your Speed, Randy Poe, 12:40
Re: Materialism is nihilism, Igor, 12:33
Re: There is no beginning and every rock eventually gets dissipated., Igor, 12:30
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 12:30
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Igor, 12:29
Re: Watch Your Speed, Robert Weldon, 12:25
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, srp, 12:22
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Morpheus, 12:19
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Henning Makholm, 12:06
Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 12:05
Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, PD, 11:59
Re: SU(2), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:48
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 11:48
Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, PD, 11:44
Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 11:44
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 11:43
Hack the Mirror, CoreyWhite, 11:41
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 11:28
Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 11:25
What Is Theta (temperature, entropy)?, W. Watson, 11:25
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:59
Re: Omega_Lambda( z )., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:58
Re: Patinha_Minha is Exhibit_A for my postulate., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:56
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:55
Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 10:44
Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, h_v_ansari, 10:38
Re: Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, Richard Herring, 10:33
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 10:12
Re: my curses, Richard Herring, 10:08
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Randy Poe, 10:06
Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, CWatters, 10:04
Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, PD, 10:00
Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, PD, 09:59
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Lostgallifreyan, 09:52
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 09:52
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Lostgallifreyan, 09:50
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, PD, 09:47
my curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:46
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:45
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 09:43
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 09:43
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, Randy Poe, 09:39
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jimp, 09:35
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, Euler Cheung, 09:33
Re: SU(2), PD, 09:14
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, C what I mean, 09:00
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, PD, 08:41
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 08:36
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Sue..., 08:29
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 08:22
Re: Animism versus nihilism, uri, 08:04
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), jmfbahciv, 08:03
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, pbdelete, 07:57
Re: Objects/Humans moving very close to c., PD, 07:44
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:42
Re: Objects/Humans moving very close to c., Jeff…Relf, 07:38
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:34
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 07:31
Re: Objects/Humans moving very close to c., PD, 07:27
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:24
Objects/Humans moving very close to c., Jeff…Relf, 07:18
Re: Watch Your Speed, Ian Parker, 07:03
Re: Animism versus nihilism, tooly, 06:54
Re: New Inductance, Richard Herring, 06:52
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, srp, 06:44
Re: Who was Satan incarnate ( thus infinitely stupid ) ?, Cranks Reply, 06:41
Who was Satan incarnate ( thus infinitely stupid ) ?, Jeff…Relf, 06:39
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 06:35
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 06:28
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 06:26
Re: Materialism is nihilism, uri, 06:25
Re: exponential distribution entropy, theopps75, 06:12
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 06:03
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 05:54
Teleportation,Levitation,Invisibility,Resurrection, jnadiaz, 05:45
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, chazwin, 05:36
Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, Jan Panteltje, 05:35
Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, tadchem, 05:10
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jmfbahciv, 05:07
Re: SU(2), José Carlos Santos, 05:07
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 05:04
Re: Materialism is nihilism, tadchem, 05:04
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 04:48
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 04:41
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 04:38
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Mark_Cordier, 04:25
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Mark_Cordier, 04:24
Re: Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., Cranks Reply, 04:23
Re: There is no beginning and every rock eventually gets dissipated., Cranks Reply, 04:22
Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., Cranks Reply, 04:20
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bob Cain, 04:13
Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, mmeron, 04:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 03:57
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 03:57
Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, Phat Bytestard, 03:55
Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, Phat Bytestard, 03:53
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 03:51
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 03:15
There is no beginning and every rock eventually gets dissipated., Jeff…Relf, 02:55
Paying Taxes/Rent., Jeff…Relf, 02:41
Physicalism is infinitely deep and meaningful., Jeff…Relf, 02:29
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, FrediFizzx, 02:23
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 01:37
Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:33
Re: electrons/perpetual motion machine, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 01:24
electrons/perpetual motion machine, bob, 01:15
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Y.Porat, 01:10
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 01:08

July 18, 2006

Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, cnctut, 23:55
Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 23:43
Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 23:40
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 23:29
SU(2), Edward Green, 23:29
Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, mmeron, 23:25
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 23:09
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, mmeron, 23:07
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 22:51
Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, malibu, 22:26
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.9: The Universe "Observation" Measured, Chuck Grempu, 22:25
Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, Chuck Grempu, 22:23
Re: Mechanic Gravity vs. Le Sage's Gravity, Sam Wormley, 22:14
Mechanic Gravity vs. Le Sage's Gravity, JoeT, 21:49
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 21:41
Re: Where have all the flowers gone?, mmeron, 21:40
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 21:31
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 21:29
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 21:27
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Tron, 21:13
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, srp, 21:09
Re: exponential distribution entropy, Henning Makholm, 20:58
Re: Could you actually create a lightsaber???, Henning Makholm, 20:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 20:45
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 20:45
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Externet, 20:39
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Milan, 20:33
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Milan, 20:31
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 20:28
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, daestrom, 20:27
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 20:23
Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 20:12
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Tom M, 20:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 19:51
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 19:26
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 19:11
Re: Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, Timo Nieminen, 19:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:49
Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, pmlonline, 18:46
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 18:43
Re: Intelligent designer, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:41
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, hhc314, 18:35
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:33
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Don Bruder, 18:25
Re: Watch Your Speed, tadchem, 18:20
The Space Shuttle Program's New Creed (was: Electric force and charge), Rock Brentwood, 18:19
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Greg Neill, 18:14
Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, pmlonline, 18:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:06
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, srp, 17:59
Re: Animism versus nihilism, tadchem, 17:55
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Lord Garth, 17:55
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 17:50
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:50
Could you actually create a lightsaber???, nebx123@xxxxxxxxx, 17:47
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Don Bruder, 17:45
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:42
Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 17:40
Re: Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, nebx123@xxxxxxxxx, 17:40
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Bob Myers, 17:36
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:34
Re: Materialism is nihilism, tg, 17:28
Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, tadchem, 17:22
Re: Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, tadchem, 17:10
Re: Mechanical Light, Sam Wormley, 17:10
Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 16:59
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Pat B., 16:56
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 16:56
Re: Materialism is nihilism, tadchem, 16:50
Re: Coulomb's law, tadchem, 16:46
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 16:35
Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 16:30
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., tadchem, 16:24
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Louis Boyd, 16:14
Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, CWatters, 16:09
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 16:01
Re: Coulomb's law, PD, 16:01
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Don Bruder, 15:58
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Don Bruder, 15:57
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:54
Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 15:44
Spinning electron is not like a little spinning ball, PD, 15:39
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, uri, 15:28
Re: Animism versus nihilism, uri, 15:13
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Immortalist, 14:57
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 14:54
Re: Watch Your Speed, Paul Cardinale, 14:54
Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., Bill Snyder, 14:28
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Igor, 14:26
Re: Mechanical Light, Scott Davies, 14:23
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:20
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:19
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:19
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, hhc314, 14:18
Re: Mass_Energy doesn't warp just space ! it warps time too., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:18
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:17
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:16
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Pat B., 14:16
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:15
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Greg Neill, 14:15
Re: Help with math problum, William Hightower, 14:11
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 14:06
Re: Animism versus nihilism, chazwin, 13:58
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, hhc314, 13:55
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 13:48
Re: Nuclear bomb design., Jim Black, 13:48
Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, a_plutonium, 13:47
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Igor, 13:45
Re: Watch Your Speed, Igor, 13:43
Re: Animism versus nihilism, smallpond, 13:40
Re: Ionizing Fans, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 13:36
Re: [OT} Where have all the flowers gone?, Jim Black, 13:35
Re: Watch Your Speed, Igor, 13:33
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Immortalist, 13:32
Nuclear bomb design., reactor1967, 13:25
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 13:22
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Igor, 13:17
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Igor, 13:15
Re: Coulomb's law, Igor, 13:13
Re: exponential distribution entropy, theopps75, 13:08
Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, PD, 13:07
Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Jim Black, 13:07
Re: Coulomb's law, Henning Makholm, 13:05
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Pat B., 13:04
Re: OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, Henning Makholm, 13:00
Re: Intelligent designer, Igor, 12:56
Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, boson boss, 12:53
Re: Coulomb's law, PD, 12:52
Re: Animism versus nihilism, uri, 12:50
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 12:44
Re: Watch Your Speed, Mike, 12:41
Re: Coulomb's law, Greg Neill, 12:41
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Greg Neill, 12:38
Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 12:38
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Steve, 12:37
Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., Igor, 12:36
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., sdrodrian, 12:36
Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., Igor, 12:35
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Igor, 12:32
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 12:29
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 12:28
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, srp, 12:24
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, PD, 12:22
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 12:21
Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 12:19
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jeff, 12:15
Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, pmlonline, 12:14
Re: Watch Your Speed, ianparker2, 12:10
Re: Sturcture of an atom, PD, 12:06
Re: exponential distribution entropy, Henning Makholm, 12:05
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Eeyore, 12:04
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Eeyore, 12:02
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 11:59
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, hhc314, 11:57
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jimp, 11:55
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jimp, 11:55
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 11:47
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Y.Porat, 11:46
Re: Watch Your Speed, CoreyWhite, 11:43
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Y.Porat, 11:40
Re: Coulomb's law, Henning Makholm, 11:39
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, hhc314, 11:37
Geomagnetic field reason, h_v_ansari, 11:34
Re: Using lift to increase speeds., Paul O, 11:31
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Y.Porat, 11:31
OT? - Clocks and time - Confusion, SmokeD, 11:30
Re: [Newbie] General (special?) relativity question, Henning Makholm, 11:15
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:04
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Radium, 10:58
Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 10:57
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 10:54
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 10:53
Re: Omega_Lambda( z )., T Wake, 10:47
Re: Help with math problum, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 10:47
Re: Patinha_Minha is Exhibit_A for my postulate., T Wake, 10:47
Re: Coulomb's law, Peter, 10:42
exponential distribution entropy, theopps75, 10:41
Re: Doing a lot of drugs is a form of obesity., T Wake, 10:41
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 10:39
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 10:38
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Randy Poe, 10:20
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Randy Poe, 10:20
Re: Watch Your Speed, Roy. Just Roy., 10:18
Re: Coulomb's law, Randy Poe, 10:01
Re: Help with math problum, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:47
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 09:46
Coulomb's law, Peter, 09:41
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 09:34
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 09:33
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Sir Frederick, 09:30
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Euler Cheung, 09:18
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 09:16
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Euler Cheung, 09:10
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 08:59
Re: Animism versus nihilism, Milan, 08:58
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 08:45
Animism versus nihilism, uri, 08:44
Re: Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, Henning Makholm, 08:37
Where have all the flowers gone?, cnctut, 08:34
Re: Watch Your Speed, CWatters, 08:31
Re: Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:22
Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., uri, 08:17
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 08:10
Re: Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, John Bailey, 08:09
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 08:07
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, C what I mean, 08:04
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Richard Herring, 08:04
Help with math problum, William Hightower, 07:58
Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., kunzmilan, 07:50
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, The Real Chris, 07:45
Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, kunzmilan, 07:33
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:28
Re: Physics on a sunny day, jmfbahciv, 07:26
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:24
Re: Intelligent designer, Cranks Reply, 07:24
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 07:22
Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., uri, 07:13
Re: Sturcture of an atom, G. L. Bradford, 07:07
Re: Omega_Lambda( z )., Cranks Reply, 07:05
Re: Field-Temperature interaction?, kunzmilan, 06:53
Re: Doing a lot of drugs is a form of obesity., Cranks Reply, 06:37
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Cranks Reply, 06:31
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Cranks Reply, 06:29
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Y.Porat, 06:27
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 06:26
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 06:19
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 06:15
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jmfbahciv, 05:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 05:58
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Cranks Reply, 05:54
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 05:54
Re: Physics on a sunny day, jmfbahciv, 05:52
Re: Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, Sam Wormley, 05:52
Re: Physics on a sunny day, jmfbahciv, 05:50
Re: need help with dynamics of a spinning spacecraft, tadchem, 05:32
Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, a_plutonium, 05:24
Re: God is pure, Richard Tobin, 05:19
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 05:17
Paradox? Tsunami on an unbounded ocean, joshipura, 04:57
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Sue..., 04:48
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Cranks Reply, 04:38
Re: Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., Cranks Reply, 04:36
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Y.Porat, 04:25
Life is as deep/shallow as you take it., Jeff…Relf, 04:13
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), John Baez, 04:13
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 04:07
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Helmut Wabnig, 04:06
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), John Baez, 03:59
Re: Relativity in Daily Life?, G. L. Bradford, 03:29
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Jim Black, 03:20
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.9: The Universe "Observation" Measured, OsherD, 03:18
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 03:16
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 03:03
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), Bill Hobba, 02:54
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.9: The Universe "Observation" Measured, OsherD, 02:37
Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 02:16
Re: Ionizing Fans, Jim Black, 02:09
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 01:53
Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, jimp, 01:05
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Don Klipstein, 01:02
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 01:02
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:59
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jimp, 00:45
Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, jimp, 00:45
Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, Corey, 00:38
Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, jimp, 00:35
Physics Investigation SOS!, shruti, 00:26
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, mmeron, 00:21
Re: Magnetic Idyll, FrediFizzx, 00:21
Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 00:19
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 00:15
Re: Casey Jones You Better Watch Your Speed, CoreyWhite, 00:09
Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 00:05
Re: Electromagnetic theory without Relativity, dda1, 00:00

July 17, 2006

Omega_Lambda( z )., Jeff…Relf, 23:58
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 23:57
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Chuck Grempu, 23:47
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, jimp, 23:45
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 23:40
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Radium, 23:39
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Chuck Grempu, 23:37
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.8: Operator-Exponent-Raising Yields Acceleration, Chuck Grempu, 23:37
Re: Watch Your Speed, virtualadepts, 23:37
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.8: Operator-Exponent-Raising Yields Acceleration, Chuck Grempu, 23:36
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.7: Quantum Gravity via Observer-Perception Theory, Chuck Grempu, 23:35
Re: What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Eeyore, 23:35
Re: Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Chuck Grempu, 23:32
Doing a lot of drugs is a form of obesity., Jeff…Relf, 23:28
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, cnctut, 23:16
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Jim Black, 23:10
What are the obstacles to building a pen-sized free-electron laser?, Radium, 23:08
Patinha_Minha is Exhibit_A for my postulate., Jeff…Relf, 22:42
Re: Watch Your Speed, jimp, 22:25
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Timo Nieminen, 22:22
Re: Electromagnetic theory without Relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 22:10
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Edward Green, 22:10
Watch Your Speed, virtualadepts, 21:47
Re: NO GRAVITATIONAL FORCE IS NECESSARY, Euler Cheung, 21:39
Re: Mechanical Light, Jim Black, 21:10
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, wbarwell, 20:53
Re: Materialism is nihilism, wbarwell, 20:48
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:39
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 20:33
Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, boson boss, 20:29
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 20:28
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 20:26
Coulomb barriers -- Electron vs. Proton, Radium, 19:55
Re: General (special?) relativity question, C. Tellermann, 19:42
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Tim, 19:38
Re: [Newbie] General (special?) relativity question, C. Tellermann, 19:35
Re: General (special?) relativity question, Sue..., 19:27
Re: Mechanical Light, Aetherist, 19:10
Re: [Newbie] General (special?) relativity question, Henning Makholm, 19:08
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 19:00
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Bert Hickman, 18:53
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 18:46
Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, boson boss, 18:44
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:42
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 18:38
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Don H, 18:33
[Newbie] General (special?) relativity question, C. Tellermann, 18:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 18:02
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 17:59
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Richard J Kinch, 17:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:50
Re: Gravitational Dipole Radiation, mike3, 17:28
Re: Positioning of gas using air ionization, Neo, 17:06
Re: Ionizing Fans, Sam Wormley, 17:01
Re: Intelligent designer, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:58
Re: Intelligent designer, Mike, 16:54
Re: Intelligent designer, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:40
Re: My Questions, tadchem, 16:38
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:31
Re: MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate., T Wake, 16:25
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Jeff, 16:15
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Andy Resnick, 16:14
Re: force vs power, Mike, 16:11
Re: Intelligent designer, Mike, 16:02
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Andy Resnick, 15:59
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Wordsmith, 15:47
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Mike, 15:45
Re: Intelligent designer, Matthew Lybanon, 15:45
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Greg Hansen, 15:37
Re: Mass_Energy doesn't warp just space ! it warps time too., Paul Cardinale, 15:27
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, uri, 15:26
Re: Ionizing Fans, Greg Hansen, 15:22
In double well potential use of instantons and path integrals, gopika, 15:18
Re: MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate., drelliot, 15:17
Re: mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, a_plutonium, 14:56
NO GRAVITATIONAL FORCE IS NECESSARY, ACE, 14:22
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 14:17
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, theomonistik, 14:07
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, theomonistik, 14:05
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, theomonistik, 14:04
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, theomonistik, 13:59
Re: Electromagnetic field bend the space?, Igor, 13:39
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 785 July 17, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 13:36
Re: Infinite reciporal interactions?, Igor, 13:28
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Josef Matz, 13:24
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Igor, 13:21
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:20
Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, Igor, 13:14
Re: The Ethics of Profiting from Foreknowledge (was: Earth acceleration and earthquake triggering Jan 9, 2003), Ben Newsam, 13:11
Re: Intelligent designer, Igor, 13:08
AVOID THIS PIECE OF SHIT, IT POINTS TO A VIRUS., dda1, 13:04
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Igor, 13:03
Re: Electromagnetic theory without Relativity, Igor, 13:01
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 12:58
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, blair . houghton, 12:57
Re: Physics on a sunny day, blair . houghton, 12:55
Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 12:43
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, GatherNoMoss, 12:41
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, chazwin, 12:33
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), drienne6, 12:30
Re: My Questions, Euler Cheung, 12:30
Electromagnetic theory without Relativity, h_v_ansari, 12:28
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 12:21
Re: adiabatic process--why so important?, W. Watson, 11:59
Re: adiabatic process--why so important?, W. Watson, 11:53
Re: Matrialism is nihilism, Tron, 11:49
Re: Sturcture of an atom, PD, 11:45
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 11:37
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), John Baez, 11:32
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 11:30
Re: Ionizing Fans, Timo A. Nieminen, 11:30
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Bill Snyder, 11:25
Re: Intelligent designer, T Wake, 11:25
Re: Intelligent designer, T Wake, 11:23
Re: Cranks_Reply, I'm supposed to believe you because... ?, T Wake, 11:22
Re: Mechanical Light, Sam Wormley, 11:20
Re: I'd like to cruise the Tongass with Patinha_Minha this summer., T Wake, 11:19
Re: Mass_Energy doesn't warp just space ! it warps time too., T Wake, 11:18
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Y.Porat, 11:18
Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, T Wake, 11:17
Re: Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate., T Wake, 11:15
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Ken S. Tucker, 11:12
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 11:12
Re: Ionizing Fans, Sam Wormley, 11:11
Re: Mechanical Light, Sam Wormley, 11:09
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Ken S. Tucker, 11:08
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 11:07
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 11:06
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 11:06
Ionizing Fans, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 11:05
Matrialism is nihilism, uri, 11:05
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jimp, 11:05
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:04
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 11:03
Re: The world of finite energy?, Y.Porat, 11:01
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 10:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 10:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 10:58
Re: stars, T Wake, 10:56
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 10:55
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 10:53
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 10:53
Re: The IQ particle, Chuck Grempu, 10:43
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:40
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 10:38
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 10:33
Re: Vector-based gravitational calculations, Randy Poe, 10:24
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 10:11
Re: stars, JoeT, 09:52
Vector-based gravitational calculations, Michel Rouzic, 09:47
Re: The Ethics of Profiting from Foreknowledge (was: Earth acceleration and earthquake triggering Jan 9, 2003), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 09:46
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 09:43
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 09:43
Re: The world of finite energy?, PD, 09:14
Re: First AA batery powered manned flight!, CWatters, 09:10
Re: Magnetic Idyll, PD, 09:05
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:58
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Cranks Reply, 08:48
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Cranks Reply, 08:47
Re: Cranks_Reply, I'm supposed to believe you because... ?, Cranks Reply, 08:46
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 08:43
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 08:43
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 08:40
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), John Baez, 08:34
Re: The IQ particle, GatherNoMoss, 07:53
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Len Gaasenbeek, 07:50
Re: Miniaturizing A Rail Gun?, Jan Panteltje, 07:17
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 07:14
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Y.Porat, 07:11
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 07:08
Cranks_Reply, I'm supposed to believe you because... ?, Jeff…Relf, 07:06
Miniaturizing A Rail Gun?, John Schutkeker, 07:02
Re: Intelligent designer, jmfbahciv, 06:52
The IQ particle, Prof . Uno di Pietra Alberti, 06:52
Re: adiabatic process--why so important?, Richard Herring, 06:40
Re: adiabatic process--why so important?, Richard Herring, 06:36
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 06:27
Re: Intelligent designer, John Christiansen, 06:17
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 17, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:38
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 05:19
Re: Physics on a sunny day, jmfbahciv, 05:15
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 05:14
First AA batery powered manned flight!, Jan Panteltje, 05:10
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 05:07
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Cranks Reply, 05:02
Re: The world of finite energy?, Cranks Reply, 05:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 04:59
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 04:57
Re: Intelligent designer, Cranks Reply, 04:57
Re: I'd like to cruise the Tongass with Patinha_Minha this summer., Cranks Reply, 04:54
I'd like to cruise the Tongass with Patinha_Minha this summer., Jeff…Relf, 04:35
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Euler Cheung, 04:30
Re: Intelligent designer, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:27
Re: Intelligent designer, uri, 04:16
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.8: Operator-Exponent-Raising Yields Acceleration, OsherD, 04:15
Re: Mass_Energy doesn't warp just space ! it warps time too., Cranks Reply, 04:09
Re: Intelligent designer, Cranks Reply, 04:07
Intelligent designer, uri, 04:00
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.8: Operator-Exponent-Raising Yields Acceleration, OsherD, 04:00
Re: Mechanical Light, Jim Black, 03:59
Re: The world of finite energy?, uri, 03:47
Re: Mutual Induction inside Atom?, tadchem, 03:38
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Don Klipstein, 03:36
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 03:21
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), Sorcerer, 03:17
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 03:13
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Ben Newsam, 03:10
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 03:07
Mass_Energy doesn't warp just space ! it warps time too., Jeff…Relf, 02:55
mass and space functionality equals charge Re: gravity a fictional force in the Atom Totality, a_plutonium, 02:51
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Sue..., 02:49
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Y.Porat, 02:47
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 02:46
Re: Magnetic Idyll, FrediFizzx, 02:15
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 01:56
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.7: Quantum Gravity via Observer-Perception Theory, Chuck Grempu, 01:55
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, tdp1001, 01:49
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 01:31
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.6: Exponential Decay in Toeplitz Matrices and Energy-Mass Conservation, Chuck Grempu, 01:25
Re: Mechanical Light, Aetherist, 01:21
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 01:20
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 01:15
Re: Mechanical Light, Aetherist, 01:13
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 01:05
Re: Sturcture of an atom, kdthrge, 01:02
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Don Klipstein, 01:01
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Timo Nieminen, 00:51
Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, Jim Black, 00:22
Re: Magnetic Idyll, FrediFizzx, 00:20
Re: Relativity in Daily Life?, J. Horta, 00:14
Re: Mechanical Light, Jim Black, 00:08

July 16, 2006

Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 23:50
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Y.Porat, 23:38
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Y.Porat, 23:33
Re: K.E.=P.E. in roller coaster?, Paul Cardinale, 23:28
Re: The world of finite energy?, Paul Cardinale, 23:21
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Paul Cardinale, 23:17
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 23:17
Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, Paul Cardinale, 23:13
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, malibu, 22:54
Re: adiabatic process--why so important?, Edward Green, 22:50
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 22:47
Re: Infinite reciporal interactions?, Euler Cheung, 22:34
Re: Infinite reciporal interactions?, Euler Cheung, 22:29
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 22:29
Re: adiabatic process--why so important?, hhc314, 22:21
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), G. L. Bradford, 22:20
Re: Mutual Induction inside Atom?, Euler Cheung, 22:15
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Euler Cheung, 22:02
Re: Mechanical Light, malibu, 22:01
adiabatic process--why so important?, W. Watson, 21:35
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 21:34
Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate., Jeff…Relf, 21:17
Re: Mechanical Light, Sam Wormley, 21:15
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Sam Wormley, 21:14
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 21:13
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 21:10
Re: Relativity in Daily Life?, Sam Wormley, 21:02
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:59
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 20:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:57
Re: The with you , troll, drelliot, 20:55
Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA, Bill Hobba, 20:47
Re: Mechanical Light, malibu, 20:43
Re: gravity as a field distortion...what ?, Sue..., 20:28
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, xxein, 20:16
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Timo Nieminen, 20:10
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brad Guth, 20:02
gravity as a field distortion...what ?, bert, 20:02
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 19:55
Re: Mechanical Light, Timo Nieminen, 19:53
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 19:52
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.6: Exponential Decay in Toeplitz Matrices and Energy-Mass Conservation, xxein, 19:51
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Phat Bytestard, 19:46
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.7: Quantum Gravity via Observer-Perception Theory, xxein, 19:45
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 19:44
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 19:39
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Edward Green, 19:31
Re: The world of finite energy?, G. L. Bradford, 19:19
Re: Magnetic Idyll, FrediFizzx, 19:15
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Sue..., 19:06
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 18:54
Re: Mechanical Light, Aetherist, 18:49
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:47
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:46
Re: Mutual Induction inside Atom?, tadchem, 18:36
Re: Infinite reciporal interactions?, tadchem, 18:28
Re: an easy way out-- charge is mass and bends space around it Re: still wrestling Re: gravity a fictional force in Atom Totality, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:26
The Ethics of Profiting from Foreknowledge (was: Earth acceleration and earthquake triggering Jan 9, 2003), markwh04, 18:21
Re: Physics on a sunny day, cnctut, 18:13
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 18:05
Re: Sturcture of an atom, Jim Black, 18:04
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:59
Re: Virtual electrical flow?, Jim Black, 17:49
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 17:37
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 17:32
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Ken S. Tucker, 17:28
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 17:21
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Edward Green, 17:19
Re: Infinite reciporal interactions?, Jim Black, 17:05
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 16:59
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Ken S. Tucker, 16:57
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.7: Quantum Gravity via Observer-Perception Theory, OsherD, 16:54
Re: Mutual Induction inside Atom?, Jim Black, 16:47
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:43
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:41
Re: I've never had one good word to say about drugs., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:41
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Ben Newsam, 16:37
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, frank_k_sheldon, 16:37
Re: Positioning of gas using air ionization, tadchem, 16:36
Re: New Inductance, Ben Newsam, 16:33
Re: Physics on a sunny day, mmeron, 16:33
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, frank_k_sheldon, 16:31
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, vanep, 16:30
Re: Electromagnetic field bend the space?, Jim Black, 16:26
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Sue..., 16:25
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Golden Boar, 16:21
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, frank_k_sheldon, 16:07
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:06
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Jim Black, 16:06
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Golden Boar, 16:04
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, frank_k_sheldon, 16:02
Re: Falling Magnet, The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Golden Boar, 15:56
Re: Mechanical Light, Jim Black, 15:55
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 15:33
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), Nathan Urban, 15:28
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 15:17
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 15:17
an easy way out-- charge is mass and bends space around it Re: still wrestling Re: gravity a fictional force in Atom Totality, a_plutonium, 15:16
Re: Physics on a sunny day, Ken S. Tucker, 15:07
Re: Mechanical Light, Jim Black, 14:56
Re: Electromagnetic field bend the space?, uri, 14:55
The with you , troll, dda1, 14:44
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 14:43
Re: Magnetic Idyll, FrediFizzx, 14:27
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Igor, 14:17
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 14:09
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 14:05
Physics on a sunny day, Edward Green, 13:52
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Sue..., 13:40
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, malibu, 13:35
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Igor, 13:32
Re: If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 13:30
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Igor, 13:22
Re: Sturcture of an atom, malibu, 13:13
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Don Klipstein, 13:01
New Forums: PhysicsMathForums.com allow physicists to think independently!! Moving beyond the String Theory Hoax, drelliot, 12:54
Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA, drelliot, 12:52
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Don Klipstein, 12:50
Sturcture of an atom, Euler Cheung, 12:41
Virtual electrical flow?, Euler Cheung, 12:41
Infinite reciporal interactions?, Euler Cheung, 12:36
If photons are helical, what are gravitons?, frank_k_sheldon, 12:35
Mutual Induction inside Atom?, Euler Cheung, 12:35
The world of finite energy?, Euler Cheung, 12:34
Electromagnetic field bend the space?, Euler Cheung, 12:34
K.E.=P.E. in roller coaster?, Euler Cheung, 12:33
Falling Magnet, Euler Cheung, 12:31
Relativity in Daily Life?, Euler Cheung, 12:31
Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, pmlonline, 12:31
No Back EMF in Magnet?, Euler Cheung, 12:29
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 12:29
Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, pmlonline, 12:24
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 12:19
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), John Baez, 12:18
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.6: Exponential Decay in Toeplitz Matrices and Energy-Mass Conservation, OsherD, 12:00
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 11:40
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jimp, 11:25
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 11:16
Re: Positioning of gas using air ionization, Greg Hansen, 11:15
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:40
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 10:24
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, p4o2, 10:18
Re: My Questions, tadchem, 10:00
Re: My Questions, tadchem, 09:51
Re: Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, Henning Makholm, 09:37
Re: My Questions, neo, 09:16
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 09:04
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 08:17
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 08:08
Infinite (as in "Infinite Universe") And Infinitesimal Indistinguishable From...., G. L. Bradford, 08:07
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 08:05
Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, srp, 07:59
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:45
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Edward Green, 07:43
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 07:17
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 07:12
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 06:20
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 06:19
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 06:17
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, donstockbauer, 06:10
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, uri, 06:02
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 05:44
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Ben Newsam, 05:44
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 05:39
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 05:31
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Mike, 05:10
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Mike, 05:08
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Mike, 05:03
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 03:29
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 03:08
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 02:11
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 02:07
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Timo A. Nieminen, 01:52
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 01:48
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, tbonepower07, 01:20
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 01:07
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 00:51
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 00:46
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Timo A. Nieminen, 00:45
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 00:44
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:37
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:22
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.4: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, Chuck Grempu, 00:18
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, Chuck Grempu, 00:17
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, Chuck Grempu, 00:14
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:02

July 15, 2006

Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 23:51
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 23:49
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, RadicalLibertarian, 23:45
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 23:19
Re: Mechanical Light, malibu, 23:10
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 23:02
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 22:53
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Jul 06 Washington, DC, malibu, 22:53
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.5: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 22:51
Field-Temperature interaction?, Euler Cheung, 22:50
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Duane C. Johnson, 22:31
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 22:27
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, OsherD, 22:19
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 22:18
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Edward Green, 21:56
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 21:47
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 21:47
Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA, Bill Hobba, 21:21
Re: God is pure, Jim Black, 21:17
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Tim Ward, 21:13
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 21:08
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 21:01
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 20:59
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Jim Black, 20:58
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 20:47
Re: Mechanical Light, Jim Black, 20:41
Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, srp, 20:27
Re: Mechanical Light, Jim Black, 20:23
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob May, 20:09
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jasen, 19:47
Re: atmospheric pressures, tadchem, 19:44
Re: stars, Math Freak, 19:39
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 19:36
Re: Physics is dead!, Henry Haapalainen, 19:31
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 19:12
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 19:10
Re: atmospheric pressures, Edward Green, 19:07
Re: atmospheric pressures, Math Freak, 18:55
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, mmeron, 18:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 18:42
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 18:40
Re: Positioning of gas using air ionization, Neo, 18:31
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Math Freak, 18:20
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 18:14
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:51
Re: Calculating gravitational stress tensor, Sue..., 17:51
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 17:45
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 17:35
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 17:33
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 17:32
Re: Patinha_Minha has moved in with me again., T Wake, 17:32
Calculating gravitational stress tensor, John Schutkeker, 17:24
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 17:00
Re: Singing to the tune of sand & Booming Sands, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:00
Re: Star Distances, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:00
Re: Newton in Space, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:00
Re: Patinha_Minha has moved in with me again., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 16:21
Re: Downpours Demystified?, Sam Wormley, 16:11
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 16:11
Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Greg Neill, 16:08
Re: Downpours Demystified?, CWatters, 16:03
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 16:03
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 16:01
Re: atmospheric pressures, The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
Re: Positioning of gas using air ionization, CWatters, 15:58
Defeating Maxwell's Demon, Jack Sarfatti, 15:50
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 15:41
Re: I've never had one good word to say about drugs., T Wake, 15:37
I've never had one good word to say about drugs., Jeff…Relf, 15:29
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 15:25
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 15:02
Reflective & Transparent FIR/THz materials, pmlonline, 15:01
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, vanep, 14:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:52
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:51
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Joop van der Velden, 14:44
Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA, James Waldby, 14:41
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 14:14
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Tim Ward, 14:11
Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 14:05
Re: stars, Sam Wormley, 14:00
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 13:57
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Igor, 13:54
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 13:51
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 13:42
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 13:40
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 13:09
Positioning of gas using air ionization, Neo, 13:03
Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA, jollyrogership, 12:53
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 12:35
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 12:34
Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Rock Brentwood, 12:34
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Rock Brentwood, 12:30
Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, my mother, 12:21
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 12:09
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 11:54
Re: Conservation of Momentum, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:49
Re: stars, Igor, 11:49
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 11:45
Re: gre physics prep, Lacustral, 11:25
Quantum electo dynamical Cellular Automata, Zitterbewegung, 11:23
Re: My Questions, neo, 11:10
Re: stars, T Wake, 11:01
Re: Patinha_Minha has moved in with me again., T Wake, 10:58
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 10:50
stars, JoeT, 10:31
Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Edward Green, 10:30
Re: universe, JoeT, 10:25
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 10:12
Re: A new book champions the importance of imagination and fantasy in mathematics, Sam Wormley, 10:10
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:03
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 09:51
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 09:43
Re: A new book champions the importance of imagination and fantasy in mathematics, Jan Panteltje, 09:37
Re: Einstein said: Time is what the clock measure., Ben Newsam, 09:32
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje, 09:18
Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Jan Panteltje, 09:15
Re: elementary problem with charges and conductor, Ludo, 09:14
Re: Mechanical Light, Sam Wormley, 09:10
My Questions, Euler Cheung, 08:37
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 08:01
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 07:55
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 07:51
Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, G. L. Bradford, 07:31
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 07:04
Patinha_Minha has moved in with me again., Jeff…Relf, 06:48
Re: 32381,97 Hz, Sue..., 06:24
Re: A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 06:05
Re: elementary problem with charges and conductor, Henning Makholm, 05:50
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:46
Re: Conservation of Momentum, Henning Makholm, 05:36
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 05:33
Re: Quantum Flux, Sue..., 05:30
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 05:27
elementary problem with charges and conductor, Ludo, 05:15
Re: Einstein and energy, will1, 05:15
Re: The force of the universe, will1, 05:10
Re: Newton in Space, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:03
A new book champions the importance of imagination and fantasy in mathematics, Sam Wormley, 03:45
Re: Gravitational Dipole Radiation, Sam Wormley, 03:44
Physicists get serious about invisibility shields, Sam Wormley, 03:39
Re: Physics is dead!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 03:31
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.4: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 02:58
This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235), John Baez, 02:45
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Math Freak, 02:34
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, OsherD, 02:23
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Math Freak, 02:14
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.4: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 02:12
Re: Newton in Space, Jim Black, 02:05
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.4: The Riccati "Creation Operator" Equation, OsherD, 01:56
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Y.Porat, 01:38
Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Archangel, 00:52
Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Archangel, 00:47
Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Archangel, 00:43
Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Archangel, 00:41
Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Archangel, 00:39
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:23
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 00:17
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 00:13
Re: Newton in Space, Randy Poe, 00:11

July 14, 2006

Newton in Space, Dirk Selis, 23:37
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 23:36
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 23:28
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, RadicalLibertarian, 23:27
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 23:25
The force of the universe, Dirk Selis, 23:19
Einstein and energy, Dirk Selis, 23:15
32381,97 Hz, Dirk Selis, 23:07
Re: Gravitational Dipole Radiation, mike3, 23:07
Re: Gravitational Dipole Radiation, mike3, 23:06
Time space, Dirk Selis, 23:00
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 22:40
Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Douglas, 22:34
Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Douglas, 22:21
Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Douglas, 22:13
Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Douglas, 22:10
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Rich Grise, 22:09
Re: How could you use the same equations ?, Douglas, 22:04
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Rich Grise, 22:03
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 21:40
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Sam Wormley, 21:25
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Michael A. Terrell, 21:24
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 21:15
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, uri, 21:10
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 20:44
Downpours Demystified?, Sam Wormley, 20:33
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 20:20
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Sam Wormley, 19:56
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob May, 19:54
Re: Physics is dead!, Henry Haapalainen, 18:59
Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, Bill Habr, 18:57
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 18:56
Re: Quantum Flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 18:40
A gymnastics shell for quantum flux, Sue..., 18:36
Re: Gravitational Dipole Radiation, Sam Wormley, 18:23
Gravitational Dipole Radiation, mike3, 17:52
Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Ken Muldrew, 17:32
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 17:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:31
Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:30
sci.physics, alt.astronomy, sci.astro.amateur, macromedia.general.brazil, Gamer, 17:20
Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, Sorcerer, 17:00
Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Jan Panteltje, 16:53
Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Ken Muldrew, 16:26
Re: force vs power, joe_avery_2005, 16:01
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Sam Wormley, 15:54
Re: need help with dynamics of a spinning spacecraft, Joe Strout, 15:54
Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, PD, 15:54
Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 15:52
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., sdrodrian, 15:52
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 15:51
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 15:50
Re: how does orbits work?, Sam Wormley, 15:50
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, PD, 15:46
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, cnctut, 15:46
Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:44
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 15:41
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:38
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 15:36
Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Jan Panteltje, 15:34
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 15:31
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 15:29
Re: universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:29
Re: how does orbits work?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:21
Re: Aging population causes big problems -- Let's hear yourbullshi..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:15
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 15:06
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 15:00
Re: How, when and where... the 5 dimensions., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:54
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Lester Zick, 14:50
Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Ken Muldrew, 14:49
Towards frictionless nanomachines, Sam Wormley, 14:48
Re: Star Distances, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:47
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Sam Wormley, 14:47
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 14:42
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Sam Wormley, 14:40
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brad Guth, 14:35
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brad Guth, 14:23
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 14:18
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Igor, 14:16
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 14:11
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 14:07
Re: Conservation of Momentum, briggs, 14:06
Re: Grasping the fourth and fifth spatial dimensions... and beyond., neo, 13:44
Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, elcaminodelbudainterior, 13:37
Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:28
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Ben Newsam, 13:14
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:09
Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, Sorcerer, 13:05
Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, Martin Hogbin, 13:03
Re: Horizon, BBC2, Thursday 13th of July 2006, Martin Hogbin, 12:53
Re: Mechanical Light, Sam Wormley, 12:49
Re: Quantum Flux, Sue..., 12:44
Re: Mechanical Light, malibu, 12:27
Re: need help with dynamics of a spinning spacecraft, puppet_sock, 12:24
Re: Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, surrealistic-dream, 12:21
Re: Mechanical Light, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:20
Re: Magnetic Idyll, PD, 11:59
Re: Horizon, BBC2, Thursday 13th of July 2006, Sorcerer, 11:55
Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, cafeinst, 11:54
Re: curses, T Wake, 11:53
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:48
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:47
Re: Conservation of Momentum, actionintegral, 11:24
Re: Grasping the fourth and fifth spatial dimensions... and beyond., T Wake, 11:21
Re: Mechanical Light, PD, 11:18
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 11:17
Re: need help with dynamics of a spinning spacecraft, Joe Strout, 11:17
Re: How, when and where... the 5 dimensions., Sam Wormley, 11:15
Re: Mechanical Light, PD, 11:12
Re: Quantum Flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 11:10
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brad Guth, 10:51
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, sean, 10:30
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:27
Re: force vs power, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:25
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:22
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 10:21
Re: How, when and where... the 5 dimensions., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:19
Re: God is pure, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:14
Re: Horizon, BBC2, Thursday 13th of July 2006, Ian Parker, 09:42
Re: God is pure, Richard Herring, 09:28
Re: Mechanical Light, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:25
Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws, G. L. Bradford, 09:22
Re: force vs power, joe_avery_2005, 09:18
Re: Mechanical Light, Sam Wormley, 09:17
Micro-pump is cool idea for future computer chips, Jan Panteltje, 09:14
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 09:08
Re: Grasping the fourth and fifth spatial dimensions... and beyond., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:37
Grasping the fourth and fifth spatial dimensions... and beyond., Jeff…Relf, 08:28
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 08:27
Re: Conservation of Momentum, briggs, 08:25
Re: Horizon, BBC2, Thursday 13th of July 2006, Sorcerer, 08:14
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 08:13
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 08:08
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 08:08
Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, jmfbahciv, 08:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 07:50
Re: Horizon, BBC2, Thursday 13th of July 2006, Ian Parker, 07:49
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 07:47
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 07:45
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 07:40
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 07:39
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:21
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Math Freak, 07:13
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 06:49
Re: God is pure, Richard Herring, 06:47
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, Cranks Reply, 06:41
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, donstockbauer, 06:38
Re: Aging population causes big problems -- Let's hear yourbullshi..., G. L. Bradford, 06:35
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 06:32
Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Jan Panteltje, 05:48
Re: The White Box, Richard Herring, 05:38
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Y.Porat, 05:33
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Math Freak, 04:56
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Harry, 04:44
Re: Quantum Flux, Sue..., 03:47
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 03:36
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.3: Quantum Gravity via Massive Modular Groups, OsherD, 03:02
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 01:30
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 01:01
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 00:57
Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, PD, 00:25
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Duane C. Johnson, 00:02

July 13, 2006

Re: GRE physics prep, john, 23:56
Re: GRE physics prep, john, 23:24
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 23:08
Re: Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?, malibu, 23:01
Re: Aging population causes big problems -- Let's hear your bullshi..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 22:57
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 22:56
Re: Magnetic Idyll, mmeron, 22:49
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:45
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 22:38
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:16
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 22:06
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 21:55
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:45
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 21:45
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 21:44
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 21:41
Re: Quantum Flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 21:17
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:16
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 21:10
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 21:05
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 20:52
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie, 20:43
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie, 20:40
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:37
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 20:24
Re: Physics is dead!, Ben Newsam, 20:15
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 19:07
Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Ken Muldrew, 19:04
Re: Conservation of Momentum, Llanzlan Klazmon, 18:47
Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, Timo Nieminen, 18:38
Horizon, BBC2, Thursday 13th of July 2006, Sorcerer, 18:22
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:11
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Duane C. Johnson, 18:06
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, johnlawrencereedjr, 18:03
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Rich Grise, 18:00
Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, PD, 17:59
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, redbelly, 17:57
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 17:57
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Rich Grise, 17:57
Re: Bill_Nye_The_Science_Guy, T Wake, 17:38
Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, CWatters, 17:35
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, tadchem, 17:32
Re: need help with dynamics of a spinning spacecraft, tadchem, 17:22
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, RHRRC, 17:11
Re: The pillars of consciousness, Doug Goncz, 17:11
Re: The pillars of consciousness, donstockbauer, 17:08
Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, milwaukeeblues, 17:03
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, mmeron, 17:02
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:01
Re: The pillars of consciousness, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:00
Re: Bill_Nye_The_Science_Guy, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:59
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:52
Re: Conservation of Momentum, actionintegral, 16:45
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, al, 16:44
Re: Conservation of Momentum, tadchem, 16:36
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, webpa@xxxxxxx, 16:28
Re: Conservation of Momentum, briggs, 16:27
Re: Conservation of Momentum, actionintegral, 16:26
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, uri, 16:13
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, mmeron, 16:07
Re: Conservation of Momentum, Henning Makholm, 15:58
Re: The pillars of consciousness, Jan Panteltje, 15:33
The pillars of consciousness, Doug Goncz, 15:26
GRE physics prep, Lacustral, 15:22
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 15:13
Re: The White Box, virtualadepts, 15:11
Re: Today's Global warming is a counter-trend., T Wake, 15:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 15:05
Re: Bill_Nye_The_Science_Guy, T Wake, 15:05
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, T Wake, 15:02
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., T Wake, 14:59
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 14:56
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 14:55
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 14:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 14:54
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 14:50
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:41
Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Jan Panteltje, 14:41
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 14:40
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 14:37
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 14:37
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 14:36
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 14:35
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 14:22
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 14:22
Re: Magnetic Idyll, my mother, 14:09
Re: 100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, hhc314, 14:06
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 14:06
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 13:56
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Jan Panteltje, 13:50
need help with dynamics of a spinning spacecraft, Joe Strout, 13:49
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob May, 13:34
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Ben Newsam, 13:26
Re: Magnetic Idyll, tendon, 13:25
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 13:25
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jimp, 13:25
Re: Conservation of Momentum, actionintegral, 13:23
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Ben Newsam, 13:22
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 13:15
Re: Mechanical Light, PD, 13:12
100 miles per gallon on a prius... with lithium-ion batteries, Jan Panteltje, 13:07
Re: Conservation of Momentum, PD, 12:56
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 12:29
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 12:24
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 12:16
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 12:15
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:13
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 12:11
dedanoe's irresistable proposal, dedanoe, 12:08
Re: Conservation of Momentum, actionintegral, 11:56
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 11:50
Re: Today's Global warming is a counter-trend., Cranks Reply, 11:49
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, Cranks Reply, 11:48
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 11:43
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 11:42
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 11:18
Re: Conservation of Momentum, PD, 11:15
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 11:07
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:03
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brad Guth, 11:01
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 10:52
Re: Bill_Nye_The_Science_Guy, PD, 10:40
Using an array of hair-thin electrodes implanted in his brain..., Sam Wormley, 10:37
Singing to the tune of sand & Booming Sands, Sam Wormley, 10:30
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 10:00
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Andy Resnick, 09:31
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 09:24
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 08:59
Re: Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions, kunzmilan, 08:58
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 08:52
BULLETIN! FIRES RAGING -- Re: Time to Burn Those Evolution Textbooks ..., Ed Conrad, 08:32
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:00
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:58
Today's Global warming is a counter-trend., Jeff…Relf, 07:56
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 07:52
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 07:49
Re: Conservation of Momentum, Sue..., 07:32
Bill_Nye_The_Science_Guy, Jeff…Relf, 07:32
All orbits are either falling-in or escaping., Jeff…Relf, 07:23
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 06:56
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 06:54
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 06:46
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 06:45
Conservation of Momentum, actionintegral, 06:43
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:33
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:32
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 06:11
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 06:03
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 05:53
Re: The White Box, Richard Herring, 05:29
Re: Mechanical Light, Jim Black, 05:27
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:26
Re: Quantum Flux, Sue..., 05:18
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:17
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, jmfbahciv, 05:11
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Ben Newsam, 03:56
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH, Ben Newsam, 03:25
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 03:24
Re: Physics is dead!, Ben Newsam, 03:15
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 02:13
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Tim Ward, 00:36
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:25

July 12, 2006

Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, noshellswill, 23:43
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 23:37
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 23:31
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 23:26
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 22:52
Re: Quantum Flux, Sue..., 22:44
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 22:42
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 22:36
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:29
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 22:24
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:19
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 22:17
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 22:16
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 22:11
Re: Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?, ytyourclothes, 21:23
if you push him now, he'll lose control, dave hillstrom, 21:19
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:18
Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Neil, 20:43
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, mmeron, 20:38
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, Edward Green, 20:35
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, mmeron, 20:11
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:03
Re: Magnetic Idyll, mmeron, 20:02
Re: Magnetic Idyll, mmeron, 19:51
Re: Quantum Flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 19:50
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 19:36
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 19:24
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 19:14
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 19:03
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, malibu, 19:01
Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, srp, 18:52
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 18:47
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 18:41
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, johnlawrencereedjr, 18:36
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, T Wake, 18:34
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 18:34
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 18:16
Re: Pascal compiler, Math Freak, 18:05
Re: The White Box, Math Freak, 18:00
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, uri, 17:58
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 17:57
Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, The Real Chris, 17:53
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Daryl McCullough, 17:49
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 17:47
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, RHRRC, 17:45
Re: The White Box, T Wake, 17:44
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 17:40
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 17:39
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 17:35
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:32
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 17:25
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 17:25
Re: God is pure, Robbyn69, 17:24
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 17:23
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jeff, 17:23
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 17:09
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 17:03
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Igor, 16:44
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 16:27
Re: Problems with radiation backreaction, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:24
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:21
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 16:16
Re: Magnetic Idyll, mmeron, 16:00
Re: Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?, uri, 15:58
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, mmeron, 15:57
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Igor, 15:51
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 15:50
Re: EINSTEIN'S PET THEORY, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:30
Re: The White Box, donstockbauer, 15:27
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, PD, 15:25
Re: E = W = F = mass, PD, 15:18
The White Box, virtualadepts, 15:09
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, RHRRC, 15:07
Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, Sue..., 14:49
Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 14:43
Re: E = W = F = mass, Randy Poe, 14:41
Re: EINSTEIN'S PET THEORY, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:39
Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, Sam Wormley, 14:39
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 14:39
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 14:37
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:31
Re: Mechanical Light, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:22
Re: universe, PD, 14:20
Re: universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:16
Re: E = W = F = mass, PD, 14:02
Re: Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, Martin Hogbin, 13:41
Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, Fabrizio J Bonsignore, 13:34
Re: E = W = F = mass, John Christiansen, 13:32
Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 13:12
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 13:09
Re: Mechanical Light, PD, 13:00
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 12:59
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 12:56
Marmet's analysis of Mermin's experiment, cafeinst, 12:42
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, mmeron, 12:41
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 12:40
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 12:28
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, p4o2, 12:24
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 12:23
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 12:17
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 11:57
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 11:45
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 11:25
Re: Pascal compiler, T Wake, 11:24
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, T Wake, 11:24
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 11:21
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 11:20
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, Greg Neill, 11:15
Re: E = W = F = mass, Greg Neill, 11:12
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 11:10
Re: IR thermometer, Jeff, 11:06
Re: Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?, Greg Neill, 11:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 10:47
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 10:43
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 10:39
Re: IR thermometer, Jeff, 10:30
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 10:27
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:22
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 10:13
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:09
Re: force vs power, Matifx, 10:08
Re: IR thermometer, Andy Resnick, 10:04
Re: IR thermometer, Andy Resnick, 10:00
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 09:55
Re: universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:47
Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, Andy Resnick, 09:47
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 09:46
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 09:39
Re: Einstein said: Time is what the clock measure., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:35
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Ben Newsam, 09:34
Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?, clintuk, 09:22
Re: Pascal compiler, ddvlad, 08:51
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 08:43
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 08:38
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, uri, 08:31
Re: universe, JoeT, 08:13
Re: universe, JoeT, 08:08
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Cranks Reply, 08:06
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, donstockbauer, 07:33
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, CWatters, 07:22
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 07:20
Re: NEW LOOK AT MAN ON THE MOON -- Astronauts or AstroNOTS?, edconrad, 07:16
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:15
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, al, 07:07
Pascal compiler, nk., 07:06
Pascal compiler, nk., 07:06
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 07:04
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:02
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Daryl McCullough, 06:59
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, Cranks Reply, 06:58
Re: EMITER's report from testin dedanoe's nerves, dedanoe, 06:51
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, al, 06:34
Re: EMITER's report from testin dedanoe's nerves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:32
EMITER's report from testin dedanoe's nerves, dedanoe, 06:28
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., Bill Snyder, 06:22
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 05:57
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:55
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:51
Re: Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Cranks Reply, 05:50
Re: Is there a co ordinate system that is based on Plancks constant?, Cranks Reply, 05:48
Re: Is there a co ordinate system that is based on Plancks constant?, tadchem, 05:46
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, jmfbahciv, 05:44
Re: Is there a co ordinate system that is based on Plancks constant?, tadchem, 05:38
Re: atmospheric pressures, tadchem, 05:37
Albert Einstein a Jewish anti-scientist, Jan Panteltje, 05:29
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 05:27
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, Cranks Reply, 05:25
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, al, 05:16
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 04:56
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 04:53
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 03:55
Re: calculating distance from the speed of sound, mmeron, 03:38
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Cranks Reply, 03:37
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 03:37
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 03:31
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 03:18
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 03:05
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 02:54
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 02:53
calculating distance from the speed of sound, al, 02:41
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 02:31
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo Nieminen, 02:10
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Mark Fortune, 02:03
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 02:02
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 01:26
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 01:22
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bill Hobba, 01:15
Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, FrediFizzx, 01:12
Basic Concepts for a Fundamental Aether Theory, mountain man, 01:08
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 01:05
Re: polarisation, FrediFizzx, 00:51
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:46
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:44
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 00:31
Re: IR thermometer, Chuck Grempu, 00:00

July 11, 2006

Re: polarisation, will1, 23:55
light-guiding effect in a component of teeth called dentin is due to light scattering, Sam Wormley, 23:25
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, krp, 23:23
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 23:22
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 23:21
Re: Need help of really smart astronomer, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:45
Re: Need help of really smart astronomer, jmac39, 22:33
Re: IR thermometer, Jeff, 22:30
Re: NEW LOOK AT MAN ON THE MOON -- Astronauts or AstroNOTS?, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:21
Re: Need help of really smart astronomer, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:13
Need help of really smart astronomer, jmac39, 22:11
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:08
Re: IR thermometer, Norm Grimpo, 22:05
Re: Metamaterials for Power Storage, Norm Grimpo, 21:52
Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 21:39
Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 21:38
Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 21:36
Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 21:35
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jimp, 21:35
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 21:33
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Art Deco, 21:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:29
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Art Deco, 21:26
IR thermometer, Jeff, 21:25
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Herb Martin, 21:25
Re: Metamaterials for Power Storage, Jonathan, 21:18
Re: Metamaterials for Power Storage, Norm Grimpo, 21:07
Metamaterials for Power Storage, Jonathan, 21:01
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 20:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Sam Wormley, 20:58
Re: Quantum Flux, Sue..., 20:51
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:49
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 20:40
Re: force vs power, srp, 20:39
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 20:37
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 20:36
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 20:34
Re: Physics wrong turns, cnctut, 20:32
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 20:29
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:18
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 20:15
Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:10
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:09
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 20:04
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 20:02
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 20:02
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 20:00
Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:58
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Sam Wormley, 19:57
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:55
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., boson boss, 19:55
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:54
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:50
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 19:48
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 19:47
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 19:46
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 19:44
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 19:43
Problems with radiation backreaction, Edward Green, 19:43
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 19:43
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Bill Snyder, 19:41
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 19:39
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 19:38
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, PerfectlyAble, 19:35
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, T Wake, 19:35
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eric R Snow, 19:33
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 19:29
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 19:28
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 19:27
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Sam Wormley, 19:26
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 19:25
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 19:24
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 19:23
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 19:20
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 19:19
Re: E = W = F = mass, Greg Neill, 19:18
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 19:18
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 19:15
Re: Quantum Flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 19:15
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 19:13
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 19:10
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob May, 19:08
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 19:07
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 19:04
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, uri, 19:02
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 18:57
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:49
Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, Math Freak, 18:46
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 18:39
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 18:28
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Randy Poe, 18:25
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Sam Wormley, 18:23
Re: force vs power, srp, 18:23
Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Sam Wormley, 18:21
(4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:17
Re: NEW LOOK AT MAN ON THE MOON -- Astronauts or AstroNOTS?, Robert Weldon, 17:37
Re: atmospheric pressures, Math Freak, 17:35
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 17:30
Re: atmospheric pressures, Math Freak, 17:29
Re: force vs power, John C . Polasek, 17:28
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jeff, 17:06
Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:43
Re: E = W = F = mass, Randy Poe, 16:37
Re: E = W = F = mass, briggs, 16:32
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 16:26
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 16:24
Re: E = W = F = mass, John Christiansen, 16:21
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 16:20
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 16:14
Re: E = W = F = mass, Randy Poe, 16:05
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:03
formula for 1/1+1/2+1/3+1/4+1/5......+1/(L-1), borje, 16:00
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 15:56
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 15:37
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 15:33
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 15:32
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:30
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 15:30
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 15:29
Re: E = W = F = mass, Randy Poe, 15:28
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 15:28
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:26
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 15:24
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 15:22
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:19
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:16
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:15
Re: E = W = F = mass, John Christiansen, 15:13
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Daryl McCullough, 15:11
Re: polarisation, Sam Wormley, 15:11
Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, PD, 15:07
Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, Sam Wormley, 15:06
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 15:05
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 15:04
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 15:03
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Sue..., 15:01
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, johnlawrencereedjr, 15:01
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 15:00
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 14:56
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, T Wake, 14:56
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:54
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, T Wake, 14:53
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:43
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:41
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bill Ward, 14:37
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bill Ward, 14:33
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, T Wake, 14:22
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 14:18
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 14:18
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 14:13
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:09
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Jan Panteltje, 14:07
Re: how does orbits work?, boson boss, 13:51
Re: polarisation, Martin Hogbin, 13:46
Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, Martin Hogbin, 13:45
Re: force vs power, Matifx, 13:39
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Dan Bloomquist, 13:35
Re: Incremental increases in gravity., puppet_sock, 13:35
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 13:34
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 13:32
Re: Curriculum for easy physics course?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:32
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 13:30
Curriculum for easy physics course?, milwaukeeblues, 13:28
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Igor, 13:28
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:26
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Igor, 13:21
Re: force vs power, Matifx, 13:16
Re: universe, Igor, 13:09
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 12:51
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 12:46
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 12:41
Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 12:33
Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 12:29
Re: Charge is not a property of particles., Randy Poe, 12:27
Re: force vs power, srp, 12:26
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 12:24
Charge is not a property of particles., malibu, 12:19
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Henning Makholm, 12:15
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:09
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, mmeron, 11:57
Re: polarisation, donstockbauer, 11:53
with the birds i'll share this such lonely view, dedanoe, 11:49
Re: polarisation, Sorcerer, 11:43
Re: Detecting Gravity Waves, Sue..., 11:41
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bill Ward, 11:27
polarisation, kedar, 11:25
Detecting Gravity Waves, clintuk, 10:52
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, PD, 10:48
Re: Mechanical Light, PD, 10:23
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 10:15
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Henning Makholm, 10:14
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Tde, 10:10
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Tde, 10:10
Re: universe, PD, 10:00
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, bill, 09:53
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 09:46
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Ian Parker, 09:35
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Ron Capik, 09:27
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 09:26
Re: universe, Sorcerer, 09:20
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 09:11
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Norm Grimpo, 09:09
Re: NEW LOOK AT MAN ON THE MOON -- Astronauts or AstroNOTS?, Mark Martin, 08:58
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Andy Resnick, 08:55
Re: Mechanical Light, Sam Wormley, 08:21
Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 08:18
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 08:12
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 08:09
Re: NEW LOOK AT MAN ON THE MOON -- Astronauts or AstroNOTS?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:02
NEW LOOK AT MAN ON THE MOON -- Astronauts or AstroNOTS?, Ed Conrad, 07:59
Re: universe, JoeT, 07:45
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 07:32
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:20
Re: brain physics, uri, 07:18
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Jan Panteltje, 07:16
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:06
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 07:03
Re: how does orbits work?, Sorcerer, 07:02
Re: E = W = F = mass, Greg Neill, 07:02
Re: universe, Sorcerer, 06:55
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, jmfbahciv, 06:53
Re: how does orbits work?, Henning Makholm, 06:52
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 06:42
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 06:24
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:17
Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 July 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Jan Panteltje, 05:52
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Jan Panteltje, 05:49
Re: atmospheric pressures, tadchem, 05:47
Re: atmospheric pressures, tadchem, 05:42
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, jmfbahciv, 05:35
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 05:06
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Eeyore, 05:01
Near real time California earthquake display !, Jan Panteltje, 04:47
Re: universe, PD, 04:05
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 04:03
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, PD, 03:59
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sorcerer, 03:03
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jasen, 03:00
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bill Ward, 02:35
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., bernardz, 02:34
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, franklinhu, 02:30
Re: Mechanical Light, PD, 02:08
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 02:01
Re: how does orbits work?, Sam Wormley, 01:38
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 01:30
Re: how does orbits work?, punkbuster, 01:12
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 July 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 01:02

July 10, 2006

Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 23:20
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 23:20
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jimp, 23:15
Re: Optics of door security viewer, Jeff, 23:00
Re: A CLEANER, CHEAPER ROUTE TO TITANIUM, Octa Ex, 22:54
Re: Modeling the universe as a white hole., Art Deco, 22:52
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:52
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 22:45
Re: more curses, David DeLaney, 22:45
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, msvilans, 22:38
Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 22:36
Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, Math Freak, 22:36
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, mmeron, 22:25
Re: E = W = F = mass, Randy Poe, 22:19
Re: Physics Today: Tributes to Hans Bethe continues, Math Freak, 22:17
Re: universe, mmeron, 22:17
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:07
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Math Freak, 22:05
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jimp, 22:05
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, jimp, 22:05
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 22:04
Re: how does orbits work?, boson boss, 22:02
Re: atmospheric pressures, Math Freak, 21:39
Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Bob Cain, 21:31
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 21:25
Re: universe, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:13
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bill Hobba, 21:12
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Ben Newsam, 21:11
Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 21:02
Re: universe, JoeT, 21:00
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bill Hobba, 20:58
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Bob Myers, 20:53
Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:52
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 20:45
Re: how does orbits work?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 20:44
Re: Sanity check., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:39
Re: brain physics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:39
Re: Electric force and charge, Jim Black, 20:32
Re: Lecture of the Week: Part VIII: Astrobiology, Ben Newsam, 20:02
Re: how does orbits work?, Ben Newsam, 19:58
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Norm Grimpo, 19:49
Re: Sanity check., Ben Newsam, 19:48
Re: Einstein said: Time is what the clock measure., Ben Newsam, 19:41
Re: brain physics, T Wake, 19:40
Re: brain physics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:38
Re: brain physics, T Wake, 19:35
Re: brain physics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:31
Re: brain physics, T Wake, 19:31
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, mmeron, 19:29
Re: brain physics, uri, 19:29
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Sam Wormley, 19:02
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 18:59
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Duane C. Johnson, 18:36
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Sue..., 18:23
Re: BONES OF CONTENTION, AmerGovtPervertsExposer, 18:23
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Timo Nieminen, 18:22
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Tim Williams, 18:19
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, default, 18:13
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Louis Boyd, 18:10
Re: BONES OF CONTENTION, AmerGovtCriminalsExposers, 17:56
Re: Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:54
Generating green light using a 510 nm AC current, Radium, 17:43
Impossible Secrifice dedanoe!, dedanoe, 17:16
Physics Today: Tributes to Hans Bethe continues, Sam Wormley, 17:09
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 17:05
Re: E = W = F = mass, Randy Poe, 16:50
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:32
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 16:18
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, T Wake, 16:18
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:16
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 16:12
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:10
Re: Magnetic Idyll, dda1, 16:08
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 16:06
Re: how does orbits work?, Sam Wormley, 16:04
Re: brain physics, T Wake, 16:01
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 16:00
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Igor, 15:59
Re: brain physics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:57
Re: brain physics, uri, 15:36
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 15:29
Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:26
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 15:25
Re: brain physics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:24
Re: brain physics, uri, 15:22
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 15:16
Re: AMERICA IN DANGER: Secret Torture Rooms, T Wake, 14:54
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 14:53
Re: AMERICA IN DANGER: Secret Torture Rooms, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:52
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 14:51
Re: how does orbits work?, OG, 14:47
Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:47
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 14:46
Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:43
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 14:32
Re: how does orbits work?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:22
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, Tony, 14:15
Re: universe, Igor, 14:02
how does orbits work?, punkbuster, 14:02
Re: Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, Igor, 13:58
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 13:54
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 13:34
Re: Quantum Flux, Sue..., 13:34
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 12:30
Global warming a prelude to pole-reversal?, malibu, 12:29
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 12:29
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 12:25
Re: Modeling the universe as a white hole., T Wake, 12:19
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 12:11
Re: EMITER is testing dedanoe, Paul Cardinale, 12:07
Re: Quantum Flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 11:59
Re: EMITER is testing dedanoe, CWatters, 11:50
Re: Incremental increases in gravity., malibu, 11:32
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Tde, 10:59
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Y.Porat, 10:23
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Sylvain Croussette, 10:11
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 09:57
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., Cranks Reply, 09:53
Re: Einstein's Thoughts on Science and Religion., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:51
Re: rubber on plastic static friction coefficient, John C . Polasek, 09:43
Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light But not in micro, Sam Wormley, 09:42
Re: God is pure, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:38
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:36
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Richard Saam, 09:25
Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light But not in micro, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:24
Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Andy Resnick, 09:07
Re: Why there must be matters (3), G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:06
Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:00
Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, Robert Kolker, 09:00
Re: universe, Sam Wormley, 08:56
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Andy Resnick, 08:52
universe, JoeT, 08:10
Re: Electric force and charge, JoeT, 08:02
Re: EMITER is testing dedanoe, Cranks Reply, 07:00
EMITER is testing dedanoe, dedanoe, 06:54
Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, Cranks Reply, 06:13
Re: E = W = F = mass, Cranks Reply, 06:11
Re: The proof of mass vector., Bilge, 06:07
Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Gary Sokolich, 06:00
Re: rubber on plastic static friction coefficient, Henning Makholm, 05:41
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 10, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:38
Re: BONES OF CONTENTION, Cranks Reply, 05:37
Re: Why there must be matters (3), Cranks Reply, 05:25
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., BernardZ, 05:23
Re: Is there a co ordinate system that is based on Plancks constant?, Aage Andersen, 05:20
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:11
Re: atmospheric pressures, tadchem, 04:28
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 04:22
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 04:11
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., tadchem, 04:05
Re: Is there a co ordinate system that is based on Plancks constant?, tadchem, 03:56
Re: BONES OF CONTENTION, Cleverbum, 03:36
Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, Cleverbum, 03:17
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.2 Quantum Gravity: Non-Markovian Memory, OsherD, 02:50
Re: Magnetic Idyll, FrediFizzx, 02:37
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.2 Quantum Gravity: Non-Markovian Memory, OsherD, 02:35
Is there a co ordinate system that is based on Plancks constant?, Nick, 02:31
Re: Why there must be matters (3), Sue..., 01:51
Re: Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., Norm Grimpo, 01:18
Using calculus with confidence. It really does work as advertised., RadicalLibertarian, 00:59
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 00:34
Megatechnology is the ultimate cure, Bret Cahill, 00:29
Why there must be matters (3), Linda, 00:06
Re: Model of Reality and magnetism, Sue..., 00:01

July 09, 2006

Re: Optics of door security viewer, 2, 23:35
Re: Incremental increases in gravity., cnctut, 23:28
BONES OF CONTENTION, Ed Conrad, 22:51
Re: atmospheric pressures, Math Freak, 22:30
Re: rubber on plastic static friction coefficient, Mike, 22:30
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Daniel Dickinson, 22:29
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bilge, 22:04
Re: Modeling the universe as a white hole., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:53
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, mmeron, 21:40
Re: E = W = F = mass, Greg Neill, 21:37
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 21:27
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Sam Wormley, 21:18
Re: Modeling the universe as a white hole., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:18
Modeling the universe as a white hole., Jeff…Relf, 21:14
Re: rubber on plastic static friction coefficient, cnctut, 21:07
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:06
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 21:05
Re: An idea on the arrow of time, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:00
An idea on the arrow of time, Daniel Dickinson, 20:58
rubber on plastic static friction coefficient, Mike, 20:39
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 20:37
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, jpolasek, 20:27
Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 20:23
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Tom Roberts, 20:19
Re: Optics of door security viewer, John C . Polasek, 20:15
Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Ogler_Bob, 20:12
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, John C . Polasek, 20:07
Re: Electric force and charge, Jim Black, 18:08
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 17:51
Re: Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions, Hero, 17:03
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 16:53
Re: Incremental increases in gravity., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 16:27
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 16:25
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, jpolasek, 16:25
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 16:24
Re: E = W = F = mass, Art Deco, 16:20
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 16:14
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, John C . Polasek, 16:10
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 16:10
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 16:03
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 16:02
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Tom Roberts, 16:01
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 15:59
Re: E = W = F = mass, T Wake, 15:57
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Igor, 15:56
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Tom Roberts, 15:53
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:45
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 15:42
Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light But not in micro, Sam Wormley, 15:40
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:39
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 15:36
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:34
Re: Einstein said: Time is what the clock measure., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:32
Re: E = W = F = mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:31
Re: Mechanical Light, Sam Wormley, 15:30
Re: E = W = F = mass, Sam Wormley, 15:27
Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light But not in micro, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:23
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 15:22
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 15:17
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 15:02
Re: E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 14:59
Re: E = W = F = mass, Greg Neill, 14:41
E = W = F = mass, Dennis B, 14:33
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Igor, 14:29
Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light But not in micro, Sam Wormley, 14:28
Re: Incremental increases in gravity., Sam Wormley, 14:24
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 14:11
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 14:05
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 14:01
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 13:40
Re: Optics of door security viewer, John C . Polasek, 13:39
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 12:37
Re: God is pure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:30
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 12:25
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 12:19
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 12:09
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 12:06
Re: A CLEANER, CHEAPER ROUTE TO TITANIUM, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 11:19
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 11:09
Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT., Y.Porat, 11:06
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 11:03
Jeff Relf - Famous Cretin, dda1, 10:24
Re: Einstein's Thoughts on Science and Religion., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:22
Re: Electric force and charge, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:16
Re: Einstein's Thoughts on Science and Religion., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:13
Re: Mechanical Light, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:12
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:09
Re: Einstein's Thoughts on Science and Religion., T Wake, 10:07
"The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Lij, 10:06
Re: Power bikes could end transport problem- cost 2 cents a mile, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:03
Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light But not in micro, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:53
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 09:49
Einstein's Thoughts on Science and Religion., Jeff…Relf, 09:47
Re: Electrical potency of a brain under different conditions?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:43
Re: Mechanical Light, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:31
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Henning Makholm, 08:44
Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, edconrad, 03:02
Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, edconrad, 02:47
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 02:45
Re: Natural bodies-surface vs.internal interactions?, kumar, 02:38
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 02:34
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 02:23
Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, Annie . Orange, 02:10
Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, LidsvilleNine, 02:06
Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, edconrad, 01:44
Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, edconrad, 01:41
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Tom Roberts, 01:34
Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, Infidel, 01:31
Re: ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, Sirius Howard, 01:18
ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING -- Better Late Than Never ,,,, Ed Conrad, 01:17
Re: A CLEANER, CHEAPER ROUTE TO TITANIUM, jimp, 01:05
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 01:03
ANOTHER LOOK AT FIRST MOON LANDING, Ed Conrad, 01:00
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 00:48
Re: Quantum Flux, Sue..., 00:18
The Geodesic that goes from the earth to the _Visible_ birth of the CMB., Jeff…Relf, 00:16
Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:13
Re: atmospheric pressures, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:13

July 08, 2006

Re: Quantum Flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 22:21
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Warhol, 22:21
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.2 Quantum Gravity: What is Geometric vs (Probable) Causal Depends on Phase, Norm Grimpo, 22:20
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.2 Quantum Gravity: What is Geometric vs (Probable) Causal Depends on Phase, Norm Grimpo, 22:19
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 22:10
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 22:00
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Art Deco, 21:29
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., dave hillstrom, 21:25
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Bill Hobba, 21:24
Re: Telescope can see moon from 30 light years, T Wake, 21:17
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Art Deco, 21:14
Re: Telescope can see moon from 30 light years, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:12
Re: Telescope can see moon from 30 light years, T Wake, 21:10
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:55
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., Art Deco, 20:53
Re: Unique spacetime events with the same position in the, Art Deco, 20:52
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in Seattle., Art Deco, 20:45
Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 20:36
Re: It's impossible to grid the cosmos with less than 5D., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:30
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:57
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Warhol, 19:55
Re: Magnetic Idyll, Sue..., 19:33
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Sam Wormley, 19:21
Re: why it is cold in cave?, Edward Green, 19:16
Re: It's impossible to grid the cosmos with less than 5D., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:16
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:14
Magnetic Idyll, Edward Green, 19:12
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Art Deco, 19:05
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 19:02
Re: It's impossible to grid the cosmos with less than 5D., Art Deco, 18:53
Re: It's impossible to grid the cosmos with less than 5D., T Wake, 18:45
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Martin Hogbin, 18:20
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 18:11
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 18:10
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Double-A, 18:10
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 18:07
Global Field Time vs In-Line Time, G. L. Bradford, 18:00
Re: No point at X occupies two Y positions ( otherwise it'd be a line )., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:07
Re: No point at X occupies two Y positions ( otherwise it'd be a line )., Odysseus, 17:06
Re: Swing and momentum, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 16:50
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:49
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Double-A, 16:47
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 16:36
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, jimp, 16:25
Re: Muzzle Brake Or ? At End Of Large Gun Barrel, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:24
Re: NEWTON WAS WRONG, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:22
NEWTON WAS WRONG, ACE, 16:20
NEWTON WAS WRONG, ACE, 16:20
Re: It's impossible to grid the cosmos with less than 5D., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:18
Re: It's impossible to grid the cosmos with less than 5D., T Wake, 16:17
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:17
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in Seattle., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:10
Re: No point at X occupies two Y positions ( otherwise it'd be a line )., T Wake, 16:09
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in Seattle., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:08
Re: No point at X occupies two Y positions ( otherwise it'd be a line )., T Wake, 16:08
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 16:07
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in Seattle., T Wake, 16:05
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., T Wake, 16:05
Re: What's wrong with the physics in _Any_ one of these links ?, T Wake, 16:04
Re: What's wrong with the physics in _Any_ one of these links ?, T Wake, 16:03
Re: It's impossible to grid the cosmos with less than 5D., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:03
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Ben Newsam, 16:01
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Ben Newsam, 16:01
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., T Wake, 16:00
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in seattle., T Wake, 15:58
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 15:57
Re: It's impossible to grid the cosmos with less than 5D., T Wake, 15:56
Re: Oscillations have a wavelength, a period _And_ a radiation pressure., T Wake, 15:53
Re: Unique spacetime events with the same position in the, T Wake, 15:53
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., T Wake, 15:50
Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, T Wake, 15:49
"The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Moc, 15:39
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 15:29
Re: Optics of door security viewer, tadchem, 14:55
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 14:39
Re: why it is cold in cave?, tadchem, 14:30
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Henning Makholm, 14:13
Re: why it is cold in cave?, Igor, 14:06
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 14:04
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., Roy L . Fuchs, 13:59
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 13:57
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 13:49
Re: force vs power, Matifx, 13:08
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:58
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Martin Hogbin, 12:57
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 12:23
Re: Optics of door security viewer, 2, 11:57
Re: Muzzle Brake Or ? At End Of Large Gun Barrel, jimp, 11:55
Re: Natural bodies-surface vs.internal interactions?, Marvin, 11:30
another 1 of 1 from dedanoe, dedanoe, 11:13
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, joeyneutrino, 10:54
Re: Why there must be matter? (2), Sue..., 10:53
Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 10:44
Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 10:40
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., kunzmilan, 10:40
A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, polaris431, 10:38
Re: Quantum Flux, Sue..., 10:15
Re: Muzzle Brake Or ? At End Of Large Gun Barrel, lubarsky, 10:10
Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Math Freak, 10:05
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Art Deco, 09:35
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, Math Freak, 09:33
Re: Why there must be matter? (2), Linda, 09:33
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, mmeron, 09:29
Re: It's impossible to grid the cosmos with less than 5D., Art Deco, 09:21
Re: Oscillations have a wavelength, a period _And_ a radiation pressure., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:21
Re: Oscillations have a wavelength, a period _And_ a radiation pressure., Art Deco, 09:19
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:18
Re: No point at X occupies two Y positions ( otherwise it'd be a line )., Art Deco, 09:17
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Art Deco, 09:14
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:14
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Art Deco, 09:13
Re: What's wrong with the physics in _Any_ one of these links ?, Art Deco, 09:12
why it is cold in cave?, j . mazak, 08:43
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 08:37
Re: Quantum Flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:24
Muzzle Brake Or ? At End Of Large Gun Barrel, Robert11, 08:19
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Ben Newsam, 08:05
Re: Mechanical Light, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:05
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 08:04
Re: What's wrong with the physics in _Any_ one of these links ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:02
Re: No point at X occupies two Y positions ( otherwise it'd be a line )., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:59
Re: What's wrong with the physics in _Any_ one of these links ?, Jeff…Relf, 07:59
Re: No point at X occupies two Y positions ( otherwise it'd be a line )., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:56
Re: No point at X occupies two Y positions ( otherwise it'd be a line )., Jeff…Relf, 07:55
Re: What's wrong with the physics in _Any_ one of these links ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:54
Re: Electric force and charge, JoeT, 07:53
What's wrong with the physics in _Any_ one of these links ?, Jeff…Relf, 07:49
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, ABarlow, 07:43
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:42
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Kadaitcha Man, 07:40
Re: No point at X occupies two Y positions ( otherwise it'd be a line )., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:39
Re: Hydraulic Presses and Force, Dennis B, 07:36
No point at X occupies two Y positions ( otherwise it'd be a line )., Jeff…Relf, 07:34
Re: Electric force and charge, JoeT, 07:33
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:28
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:28
Re: Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:27
Re: Oscillations have a wavelength, a period _And_ a radiation pressure., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:26
Re: It's impossible to grid the cosmos with less than 5D., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:26
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Sue..., 07:10
Floating on a river of time, carried past events spread out timelessly., Jeff…Relf, 06:56
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 06:55
Re: Why there must be matter? (2), Sue..., 06:48
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, mmeron, 06:01
Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 05:57
Bending a Soccer Ball, Sam Wormley, 05:55
Extinction gets synchronized, Sam Wormley, 05:54
Optics of door security viewer, Jane, 05:54
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Henning Makholm, 05:52
Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje, 05:51
Re: Two-slit experiment, Sue..., 05:49
Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje, 05:35
Re: Anisotropy In The Gravity Force Proven., Max Keon, 05:30
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 05:01
Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Bob Cain, 04:48
Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, Helmut Wabnig, 04:37
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, CWatters, 04:18
Re: Only a Test -- DO NOT READ (And THAT Means YOUI}}, donstockbauer, 04:01
Re: 14 million year fly found conserved in plastic spray, donstockbauer, 03:56
Why there must be matter? (2), Linda, 03:45
Re: Electric force and charge, Jim Black, 03:13
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Y.Porat, 03:02
Re: GRAVITATION, kirov, 02:37
Oscillations have a wavelength, a period _And_ a radiation pressure., Jeff…Relf, 02:30
Re: Electric force and charge, franklinhu, 02:16
Re: preventing corrosion, Jeff, 02:04
Re: Two-slit experiment, FrediFizzx, 01:59
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, Bill_Vajk, 01:54
It's impossible to grid the cosmos with less than 5D., Jeff…Relf, 01:45
Re: Swing and momentum, Bill_Vajk, 01:37
Re: Two-slit experiment, FrediFizzx, 01:27
Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, ABarlow, 01:20
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.2 Quantum Gravity: What is Geometric vs (Probable) Causal Depends on Phase, OsherD, 01:12
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.2 Quantum Gravity: What is Geometric vs (Probable) Causal Depends on Phase, OsherD, 00:47
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, mmeron, 00:23

July 07, 2006

Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, DWIII, 23:46
Re: Natural bodies-surface vs.internal interactions?, kumar, 23:11
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 23:07
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 23:02
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:54
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:52
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.1: Quantum Gravity Via Dark Energy and Dark Matter Models, OsherD, 22:51
Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 22:26
Re: Unique spacetime events with the same position in the Pressure_Scape., Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:22
Re: Unique spacetime events with the same position in the Pressure_Scape., Art Deco, 22:21
Re: Unique spacetime events with the same position in the, Art Deco, 22:02
Re: Unique spacetime events with the same position in the Pressure_Scape., Bill Snyder, 21:51
Re: Life is like a casino-prison., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:27
Re: Life is like a casino-prison., Art Deco, 21:25
Re: Defining the SI kilogram as X oscillations of an SI ( ideal ) atom laser., Art Deco, 21:22
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., Art Deco, 21:21
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., Art Deco, 21:20
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in Seattle., Art Deco, 21:18
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in seattle., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:16
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in Seattle., Art Deco, 21:15
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in seattle., Art Deco, 21:14
Re: Unique spacetime events with a common position in the Pressure_Scape., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:13
Re: Unique spacetime events with the same position in the, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:12
Re: Unique spacetime events with a common position in the Pressure_Scape., Sjouke Burry, 21:10
Re: Unique spacetime events with the same position in the, Jeff…Relf, 21:07
Re: Unique spacetime events with a common position in the Pressure_Scape., Eric Gisse, 21:04
Re: Unique spacetime events with a common position in the Pressure_Scape., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:01
Re: Unique spacetime events with a common position in the Pressure_Scape., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:59
Re: Unique spacetime events with a common position in the Pressure_Scape., Art Deco, 20:59
Re: Unique spacetime events with the same position in the Pressure_Scape., T Wake, 20:58
Re: Unique spacetime events with a common position in the Pressure_Scape., T Wake, 20:53
Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Eric Gisse, 20:53
Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, lucasea, 20:49
Re: Unique spacetime events with the same position in the Pressure_Scape., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:49
Re: Unique spacetime events with the same position in the Pressure_Scape., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:47
Re: Unique spacetime events with a common position in the Pressure_Scape., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:45
Unique spacetime events with the same position in the Pressure_Scape., Jeff…Relf, 20:43
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, mountain man, 20:37
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:34
Unique spacetime events with a common position in the Pressure_Scape., Jeff…Relf, 20:34
Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:33
Re: Thinking wihout a brain, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:31
Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, T Wake, 20:31
Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Eric Gisse, 20:20
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:18
Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, jstevh, 20:16
Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 19:49
Re: more newtonian crap, malibu, 19:34
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, Math Freak, 19:29
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 19:28
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 19:17
Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, jimp, 19:05
Re: Light and wave, Sorcerer, 18:50
Re: more newtonian crap, Sorcerer, 18:44
Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, PD, 18:20
Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, PD, 18:20
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 18:19
Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, T Wake, 17:50
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Ken Muldrew, 17:45
Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, Salmon Egg, 17:25
Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje, 17:25
Re: force vs power, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:23
Re: force vs power, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:20
Re: force vs power, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:16
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, tadchem, 17:14
OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Jul 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 17:13
Re: force vs power, joe_avery_2005, 17:13
Re: (Why does Spaceman keep coming and going?) Expanding Universe, T Wake, 17:05
Re: (Why does Spaceman keep coming and going?) Expanding Universe, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:01
Re: (Why does Spaceman keep coming and going?) Expanding Universe, Cam Jones, 16:52
Two-slit experiment, nightlight, 16:46
Re: more newtonian crap, FrediFizzx, 16:37
Re: (Why does Spaceman keep coming and going?) Expanding Universe, T Wake, 16:31
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., T Wake, 16:29
Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, T Wake, 16:28
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 16:13
Re: more newtonian crap, malibu, 16:08
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 16:00
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 15:53
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, mmeron, 15:44
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Jack Dominey, 15:41
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 15:36
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, PD, 15:31
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, mmeron, 15:30
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 15:29
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 15:28
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 15:15
Re: more newtonian crap, John C . Polasek, 15:14
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 15:03
Re: Natural bodies-surface vs.internal interactions?, Sam Wormley, 14:56
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 14:52
Natural bodies-surface vs.internal interactions?, kumar, 14:45
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, John C . Polasek, 14:44
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:43
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 14:34
Re: Thinking wihout a brain, Igor, 14:31
(Why does Spaceman keep coming and going?) Expanding Universe, Cam Jones, 14:25
still wrestling Re: gravity a fictional force in Atom Totality Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, a_plutonium, 14:14
Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 14:09
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, DWIII, 14:09
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 784 July 7, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, malibu, 14:08
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Ken Muldrew, 14:07
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Ken Muldrew, 14:02
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in seattle., Mike Schilling, 14:01
Re: Quantum Flux, Sue..., 13:52
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Randy Poe, 13:32
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 13:26
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:21
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., T Wake, 13:19
Re: Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, Andy Resnick, 13:15
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:09
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Randy Poe, 13:07
Re: Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, malibu, 13:05
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, FearlessFerret, 13:00
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., T Wake, 12:54
Re: Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, malibu, 12:49
Re: Quantum Flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 12:46
Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., Immortalist, 12:42
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 12:42
Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, T Wake, 12:37
Re: Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, T Wake, 12:31
Re: Electromagnetic theory without relativity, T Wake, 12:29
Re: more newtonian crap, malibu, 12:26
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 784 July 7, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:16
Re: Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:15
Re: Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, malibu, 12:02
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., T Wake, 11:58
Re: Defining the SI kilogram as X oscillations of an SI ( ideal ) atom laser., T Wake, 11:56
Re: Density_Time_Space, T Wake, 11:54
Re: Density_Time_Space, T Wake, 11:53
Is there a scientific definition of Fahrenheit, or not?, DWIII, 11:49
Re: Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, malibu, 11:48
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 784 July 7, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, malibu, 11:40
Re: Electric field strength, Jim Black, 11:32
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 784 July 7, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 11:24
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, malibu, 11:14
Re: Density_Time_Space, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:00
Re: Density_Time_Space, Bill Snyder, 10:57
Re: Virus alert- Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:57
Virus alert- Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 10:56
Re: force vs power, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:56
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 10:46
Re: force vs power, joe_avery_2005, 10:20
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 10:13
Re: Mechanical Light, Sam Wormley, 10:07
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 10:03
Re: Mechanical Light, PD, 09:42
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., dave hillstrom, 09:33
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 09:25
"Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations 3", Lij, 09:18
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 09:16
Re: Density_Time_Space, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:15
Re: Density_Time_Space, Bill Snyder, 09:14
Re: Defining the SI kilogram as X oscillations of an SI ( ideal ) atom laser., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:55
Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, Cleverbum, 08:54
Defining the SI kilogram as X oscillations of an SI ( ideal ) atom laser., Jeff…Relf, 08:50
Only a Test -- DO NOT READ (And THAT Means YOUI}}, Ed Conrad, 08:45
Re: Electric force and charge, JoeT, 08:40
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 08:34
14 million year fly found conserved in plastic spray, Dino Saurus, 08:30
Re: Mechanical Light, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:30
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 08:27
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 08:24
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 08:22
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 08:00
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, briggs, 07:58
Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, Straydog, 07:35
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in Seattle., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:24
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in seattle., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:23
Re: Life is like a casino-prison., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:21
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:18
Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:13
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 06:54
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in seattle., T Wake, 06:18
Re: Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in Seattle., T Wake, 06:16
Re: Life is like a casino-prison., T Wake, 06:15
Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, ABarlow, 06:09
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 05:54
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:47
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 05:43
Re: Hydraulic Presses and Force, tadchem, 05:36
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 05:25
Re: Electric field strength, mark, 05:24
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 05:19
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, Eric Gisse, 04:59
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Benod The Numerous, 04:55
Re: Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, mountain man, 04:42
Re: Using lift to increase speeds, Ben Newsam, 04:00
Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in Seattle., Jeff…Relf, 03:47
Pressure_Time_Space, e.g. I'm going to fart tomorrow in seattle., Jeff…Relf, 03:24
Re: Life is like a casino-prison., Eric Gisse, 03:07
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 02:54
Re: Where is the flaw?, Jim Black, 02:35
Life is like a casino-prison., Jeff…Relf, 02:22
Re: Where is the flaw?, Jim Black, 02:20
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Eric Gisse, 02:11
Re: Electric force and charge, franklinhu, 02:11
Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, Cleverbum, 01:52
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 01:50
Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong, franklinhu, 01:38
New Cretin Alert : Hamid Ansari, dda1, 01:29
Surface tension theory, Glaring mistakes, h_v_ansari, 01:28
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 01:26
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 01:14
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 01:08
Re: Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, Sam Wormley, 01:01
Electrostatics mistakes, Capacitance independence from dielectric, h_v_ansari, 00:58
Electromagnetic theory without relativity, h_v_ansari, 00:46
Re: Electric field strength, Jim Black, 00:34
Re: Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, jimp, 00:25
Why there must be matter, how about just energy?, Linda, 00:10

July 06, 2006

Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Eric Gisse, 23:38
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:28
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 23:27
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., Roy L . Fuchs, 23:21
Re: Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone, Art Deco, 23:15
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, Math Freak, 23:10
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 23:07
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 23:01
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 22:55
Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Math Freak, 22:52
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:50
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:35
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:33
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, Math Freak, 22:21
Re: If Godzilla appeared once, why couldn't he appear again ?, Art Deco, 22:10
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., Art Deco, 22:09
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Math Freak, 21:54
Re: Density_Time_Space, Art Deco, 21:53
Re: Density_Time_Space, Art Deco, 21:51
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 21:46
Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! The Mother er Kook is Back!of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., Bill Hobba, 21:43
Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 21:41
Re: Density_Time_Space, Bill Snyder, 21:12
Re: That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:05
That's "Islamic Dress" all right :-), Math Freak, 21:03
Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:02
Re: Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:00
Article: Universe weighs in surprisingly light, Robert Karl Stonjek, 21:00
Re: Density_Time_Space, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:59
Re: Density_Time_Space, T Wake, 20:53
Re: Density_Time_Space, Eric Gisse, 20:52
Re: Density_Time_Space, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:42
Re: Density_Time_Space, T Wake, 20:32
Re: Density_Time_Space, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:31
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 20:17
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., T Wake, 20:13
Density_Time_Space, Jeff…Relf, 20:11
A Stellar Pair of Shades, Sam Wormley, 20:09
Re: johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:04
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Tom Ring, 19:48
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 19:32
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 19:14
Re: Proposed radical new approach to understanding the universe, Rock Brentwood, 19:10
Re: A FORCE IS UNNECESSARY FOR ORBITAL MOTION, Rock Brentwood, 19:02
Re: Superman & General Relativity, Rock Brentwood, 19:00
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 17:51
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 17:39
Re: I was speaking of my newsreader when I said my " car " was custom., Eric Gisse, 17:36
Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Eric Gisse, 17:33
Re: force vs power, Matifx, 17:14
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, blair . houghton, 16:59
Re: Electric field strength, Norm Grimpo, 16:59
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 16:50
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:50
Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 16:46
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 16:45
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., Penn, 16:38
Re: Quantum Flux, Sue..., 16:32
Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., Sorcerer, 16:32
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 16:31
Re: Electric field strength, Randy Poe, 16:22
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 16:16
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 16:14
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 16:11
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 16:08
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, PD, 16:01
Electric field strength, mark, 15:50
Re: fissionable isotopes?, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:47
johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006, johnlawrencereedjr, 15:32
Re: fissionable isotopes?, mmeron, 15:19
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Greg Neill, 15:17
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 15:10
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:09
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 15:05
Re: Australian solar reflector project, mrdarrett, 14:50
Australian solar reflector project, mrdarrett, 14:48
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 14:45
Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., Paul Cardinale, 14:41
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 14:36
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Ben Newsam, 14:35
more newtonian crap, malibu, 14:34
Re: fissionable isotopes?, Ken Muldrew, 14:18
simple "either or" situation, dedanoe, 14:06
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Jack Dominey, 14:06
Re: Dedanoe's little explosive device, dedanoe, 14:02
Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Norm Grimpo, 14:01
Re: Quantum Flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 13:53
Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, T Wake, 13:32
Re: Where is the flaw?, T Wake, 13:30
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 13:28
Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! The Mother er Kook is Back!of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., dda1, 13:26
Re: force vs power, Matifx, 13:25
Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:24
Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! - The ing Troll is Back, dda1, 13:24
Re: Mechanical Light, Jim Black, 13:24
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., sdrodrian, 13:21
Re: I was speaking of my newsreader when I said my " car " was custom., T Wake, 13:21
Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!!, T Wake, 13:19
Re: SI density can be defined as X number of cesium maser oscilations., T Wake, 13:13
Re: Where is the flaw?, Richard Herring, 13:09
Re: Superman bores me., T Wake, 13:09
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 13:08
Re: Where is the flaw?, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:53
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 12:52
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., T Wake, 12:52
Where is the flaw?, cafeinst, 12:50
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., T Wake, 12:49
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., T Wake, 12:47
Re: If Godzilla appeared once, why couldn't he appear again ?, T Wake, 12:46
Re: I was speaking of my newsreader when I said my " car " was custom., Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:44
Re: I don't intend to sell my physical theories., T Wake, 12:43
Re: I can't predict how many hours I might be working., T Wake, 12:41
Re: I was speaking of my newsreader when I said my " car " was custom., T Wake, 12:38
Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:28
Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., William Blake Jr., 12:24
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 12:23
Re: the simplest system of units of measure, PD, 12:21
Re: Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:56
Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!! Realizing this might have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions., jollyrogership, 11:54
Moving Dimensions Theory!! Rock On!!, drelliot, 11:52
Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, redbelly98, 11:42
Re: solar chimney, mrdarrett, 11:37
Re: force vs power, blair . houghton, 11:20
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 10:57
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 10:51
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 10:49
Re: I invite any and all to plonk me, both in life and on Usenet., Archie Leach, 10:45
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 10:31
Re: electrostatic, Wiallim, 10:26
Superman bores me., Jeff…Relf, 10:26
Re: Mechanical Light, PD, 10:13
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Ben Newsam, 10:04
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Ben Newsam, 09:59
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Ben Newsam, 09:57
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 09:50
Re: force vs power, Dr Photon, 09:41
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 09:40
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, PD, 09:39
Re: Light and wave, PD, 09:33
Re: Quantum Flux, Sue..., 09:32
Re: Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, Matthew Lybanon, 09:26
Re: Mechanical Light, Sam Wormley, 09:26
"Corrections to Special Relativity 3", Lij, 09:24
Re: Mechanical Light, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:21
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 09:15
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 09:15
Re: Mechanical Light, jmfbahciv, 09:12
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, jmfbahciv, 09:11
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Randy Poe, 09:09
Re: Mechanical Light, JoeT, 09:08
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Randy Poe, 09:06
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 09:00
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 08:52
Re: force vs power, Matifx, 08:44
Re: force vs power, Matifx, 08:41
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 08:18
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Ben Newsam, 08:09
Re: force vs power, Dr Photon, 07:58
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 07:57
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:56
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:50
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 07:47
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., sdr, 07:43
Re: the simplest system of units of measure, redbelly98, 07:35
Quantum Flux, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 07:34
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 07:21
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 07:18
Trying to solve a system of force ODEs, Cleverbum, 07:15
Re: SI density can be defined as X number of cesium maser oscilations., Kadaitcha Man, 07:13
Re: SI density can be defined as X number of cesium maser oscilations., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:07
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:06
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 07:06
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:04
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 07:02
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 06:56
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 06:55
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, jmfbahciv, 06:50
SI density can be defined as X number of cesium maser oscilations., Jeff…Relf, 06:41
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 05:48
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 05:32
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 05:11
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 05:01
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Richard Herring, 04:41
Re: I am confused with Magnetic theory, Martin Hogbin, 04:27
Re: I can't predict how many hours I might be working., Cranks Reply, 04:25
Re: I was speaking of my newsreader when I said my " car " was custom., Cranks Reply, 04:23
Re: force vs power, Cranks Reply, 04:20
force vs power, Matifx, 04:13
Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Cranks Reply, 04:02
Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Cranks Reply, 03:58
Re: MASS OF THE PHOTON, Cranks Reply, 03:49
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, hhc314, 03:46
Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Y.Porat, 03:25
Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, Eric Gisse, 02:40
Re: Factoring idea, problems with math community, jstevh, 01:56
Re: solar chimney, mrdarrett, 01:48
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, operator jay, 01:32
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 01:02
Re: Physics is dead!, Sorcerer, 00:49
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 00:40
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 00:38
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., Odysseus, 00:11
Re: I don't intend to sell my physical theories., Sam Wormley, 00:02

July 05, 2006

Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Benod The Numerous, 23:51
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 23:41
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 23:40
Re: Physics is dead!, Eric Gisse, 23:31
solar chimney, Jeff, 23:28
Re: I don't intend to sell my physical theories., Eric Gisse, 23:28
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 23:04
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 23:02
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 23:01
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:58
Re: Light and wave, malay, 22:56
Re: Crank_Lover, do you have a home ?, Art Deco, 22:55
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:52
Re: There's no limit to density just like there's no limit to vacuity., Art Deco, 22:48
Re: Cosmic entropy and time can be measured in light-years., Art Deco, 22:46
Re: Google: - ( 10 ^ -29 grams / cm^3 ) * c^2, Art Deco, 22:44
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., Art Deco, 22:43
Re: Omega_Total is always 1, Omega_Lambda is always .74, w is always -1., Art Deco, 22:40
Re: T.J.'s birth-place., Art Deco, 22:38
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., Bill Snyder, 22:37
Re: I'm fat enough as it is., Art Deco, 22:36
Re: If Godzilla appeared once, why couldn't he appear again ?, Art Deco, 22:25
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., Art Deco, 22:23
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., Art Deco, 22:22
Re: Death happens, the universe is cooling... it's all basic physics., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:59
Re: Death happens, the universe is cooling... it's all basic physics., Agent Smith, 21:52
I can't predict how many hours I might be working., Jeff…Relf, 21:36
Re: I was speaking of my newsreader when I said my " car " was custom., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:14
I was speaking of my newsreader when I said my " car " was custom., Jeff…Relf, 21:12
Re: It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:05
It's impossible to distinguish between various models of early inflation., Jeff…Relf, 21:01
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 20:54
Re: fissionable isotopes?, mmeron, 20:42
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 20:28
Re: fissionable isotopes?, Timo Nieminen, 20:17
Re: If Godzilla appeared once, why couldn't he appear again ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:17
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 20:05
Re: If Godzilla appeared once, why couldn't he appear again ?, Randy Poe, 20:02
Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:50
Re: ICBM Trajectories ?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 19:33
Cranks_Reply, how do you know T.J. personally ? face-to-face ?, Jeff…Relf, 19:19
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 19:17
Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, Eeyore, 19:16
Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:47
Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, T Wake, 18:45
Re: I don't intend to sell my physical theories., T Wake, 18:43
Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:42
Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, T Wake, 18:42
Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, T Wake, 18:41
Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:40
Re: I don't intend to sell my physical theories., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:39
Re: Earth on course for asteroid collision 2029, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:39
I don't intend to sell my physical theories., Jeff…Relf, 18:38
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, srp, 18:35
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:34
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 18:32
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, srp, 18:25
Re: "The Paradox of Zeno", Ben Newsam, 18:24
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 18:19
Re: Why sending a signal, or travel, back in time can't be done, Ben Newsam, 18:12
Re: The Expanding Universe, Sam Wormley, 18:05
Re: Will this work for back-of-the-envelope thermal diffusion?, mmeron, 17:53
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 17:53
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Sue..., 17:46
Re: fissionable isotopes?, mmeron, 17:41
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 17:24
Re: Physics is dead!, Paul B. Andersen, 17:21
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 17:13
Re: The Expanding Universe, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:06
Re: The Expanding Universe, lukendog, 17:04
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 17:02
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:54
Re: Will this work for back-of-the-envelope thermal diffusion?, Paul Ciszek, 16:29
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:28
Will this work for back-of-the-envelope thermal diffusion?, Paul Ciszek, 16:27
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 16:25
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., dan.echegoyen@xxxxxxxxx, 16:17
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:16
Re: fissionable isotopes?, mrdarrett, 16:15
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 16:11
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, hhc314, 16:09
Re: What I hate and what I want, Evgenij Barsukov, 15:58
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:54
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, PD, 15:19
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 15:16
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 15:05
Re: If Godzilla appeared once, why couldn't he appear again ?, T Wake, 14:53
Re: If Godzilla appeared once, why couldn't he appear again ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:30
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 14:23
Re: I'm fat enough as it is., T Wake, 13:55
Re: fissionable isotopes?, mmeron, 13:54
Re: T.J.'s birth-place., T Wake, 13:54
Re: I'm fat enough as it is., T Wake, 13:51
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 13:51
Re: Crank_Lover, do you have a home ?, T Wake, 13:48
Re: Crank_Lover, do you have a home ?, T Wake, 13:45
Re: I invite any and all to plonk me, both in life and on Usenet., T Wake, 13:44
Re: T.A.D. can't bare to associate with woman of lesser minds., T Wake, 13:42
Re: Old people., T Wake, 13:41
Re: Omega_Total is always 1, Omega_Lambda is always .74, w is always -1., T Wake, 13:38
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 13:38
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., T Wake, 13:29
Re: Truth is the very last thing a sci-fi freak wants., T Wake, 13:26
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 13:25
Re: Cosmic entropy and time can be measured in light-years., T Wake, 13:24
Re: If Godzilla appeared once, why couldn't he appear again ?, T Wake, 13:20
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, briggs, 13:20
Re: Google: - ( 10 ^ -29 grams / cm^3 ) * c^2, T Wake, 13:19
Re: Kadaitcha_Mommy's time stamp., T Wake, 13:15
Re: What your post looked like to me when I first received it., T Wake, 13:14
Re: The smartest posters are the ones who quote/restate deliberately/assiduously., T Wake, 13:11
Re: Mechanical Light, Jim Black, 13:11
Re: Light and wave, Igor, 13:10
Re: fissionable isotopes?, mrdarrett, 13:09
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 13:08
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, srp, 13:08
Re: Kadaitcha_Mommy's time stamp., T Wake, 13:08
OT: Rewired for Consciousness?, Sam Wormley, 13:06
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, briggs, 13:04
Re: The games model the banker's market place., T Wake, 13:03
Re: The games model the banker's market place., T Wake, 13:00
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Gman, 13:00
Re: If someone paid me, I'd write code/theories for them, not me., T Wake, 12:58
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, srp, 12:57
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 12:57
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 12:51
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Grav, 12:47
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Richard Herring, 12:41
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, mmeron, 12:37
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, srp, 12:34
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 12:34
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Jan Panteltje, 12:28
Re: Entanglement communication is paranormal signal nonlocality, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:13
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 12:03
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 11:56
Re: www.rotten.com, Cranks Reply, 11:55
Re: ICBM Trajectories ?, Randy Poe, 11:50
Re: ICBM Trajectories ?, Norm Grimpo, 11:46
Re: fissionable isotopes?, Sam Wormley, 11:44
Re: ICBM Trajectories ?, Randy Poe, 11:42
fissionable isotopes?, mrdarrett, 11:39
Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory., sdrodrian, 11:37
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Randy Poe, 11:33
Re: ICBM Trajectories ?, John C . Polasek, 11:20
Re: Google: - ( 10 ^ -29 grams / cm^3 ) * c^2, John C . Polasek, 11:05
Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s, Dennis B, 11:03
Re: Shuttle lift-off questions, Randy Poe, 11:03