sci.physics (date)

sci.physics (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

June 30, 2006

Re: Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions, FrediFizzx, 16:19
Re: Electric force and charge, Jan Panteltje, 16:14
Re: Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions, Neil, 16:11
Re: The solar system would explode., Gene Ward Smith, 15:49
Re: Electric force and charge, Igor, 15:47
Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Helmut Wabnig, 14:54
Re: T_Wake's going to leave., Penn, 14:50
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, GSS, 14:45
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 14:41
Re: Emotional Forces?, Rock Brentwood, 14:35
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 14:27
Re: Emotional Forces?, Rock Brentwood, 14:24
Re: Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions, Sue..., 14:21
Re: What I hate and what I want, jimz, 14:20
Re: Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions, Sam Wormley, 14:06
Re: Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions, Rock Brentwood, 13:58
Re: Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions, Neil, 13:37
Re: What I hate and what I want, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:30
Re: What I hate and what I want, Eeyore, 13:27
Re: electrostatic, Ludo, 13:23
Re: gravity a fictional force in Atom Totality Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, a_plutonium, 13:20
Re: electrostatic, Ludo, 13:19
Re: electrostatic, Ludo, 13:18
Re: What I hate and what I want, Sam Wormley, 13:13
Re: What I hate and what I want, T Wake, 13:06
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 13:00
What I hate and what I want, Radium, 12:58
Re: Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 12:24
Re: There is no greater God than entropy., T Wake, 12:15
Re: There is no greater God than entropy., T Wake, 12:11
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 12:10
Re: Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions, T Wake, 12:09
Re: There is no greater God than entropy., Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:08
Re: There is no greater God than entropy., T Wake, 12:06
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 12:05
Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions, Neil, 12:01
Re: electrostatic, Wiallim, 12:00
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:20
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 11:19
Re: Is there a relationship between optical band gap and activation energy?, JAH, 11:07
Re: There is no greater God than entropy., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:56
Re: The solar system would explode., Chris L Peterson, 10:55
Re: Do you know how to calculate the energy of a photon ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:46
Re: The real kooks., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:45
Re: T_Wake's going to leave., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:42
Re: The solar system would explode., Peter Webb, 10:17
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 10:15
"Examining Mathematical Approaches", Dlo, 10:10
Re: I never assume someone dumb just because _I_ failed to understand them., T Wake, 10:09
Re: T_Wake's going to leave., T Wake, 10:08
Re: T_Wake's going to leave., Bill Snyder, 10:05
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Bill Snyder, 09:55
I never assume someone dumb just because _I_ failed to understand them., Jeff…Relf, 09:50
T_Wake's going to leave., Jeff…Relf, 09:45
Re: There is no greater God than entropy., T Wake, 09:40
There is no greater God than entropy., Jeff…Relf, 09:38
Re: electrostatic, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 09:32
Re: Do you know how to calculate the energy of a photon ?, T Wake, 09:30
Re: The real kooks., T Wake, 09:28
Re: Is there a relationship between optical band gap and activation energy?, Andy Resnick, 09:28
Re: The solar system would explode., T Wake, 09:25
Re: electrostatic, Andy Resnick, 09:20
Re: Pulse Function, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 09:17
Do you know how to calculate the energy of a photon ?, Jeff…Relf, 09:09
Re: StarGate is a documentory ?, T Wake, 09:07
Re: T_Wake's instantly vanishing universe., T Wake, 09:06
The real kooks., Jeff…Relf, 08:59
Re: One moment you're here, the next you're zero-point energy., T Wake, 08:52
Is there a relationship between optical band gap and activation energy?, JAH, 08:52
electrostatic, Ludo, 08:46
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 08:25
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 08:23
Re: Pulse Function, john, 08:08
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, jmfbahciv, 07:55
Re: Entropy can be modeled as an expansion of spacetime over cosmological time., G. L. Bradford, 07:52
Re: Hydraulic Presses and Force, Dennis B, 07:36
Re: Electric force and charge, JoeT, 07:23
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, jmfbahciv, 06:58
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, jmfbahciv, 06:55
Re: One moment you're here, the next you're zero-point energy., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:55
One moment you're here, the next you're zero-point energy., Jeff…Relf, 06:52
Re: The solar system would explode., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:40
The solar system would explode., Jeff…Relf, 06:35
Re: Crank_Seeker's phallus is a wee fallacy., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:31
Re: T_Wake's instantly vanishing universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:27
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, cmaj10, 06:12
dedanoe's letter to Eric, dedanoe, 06:04
Re: Which version of it? :-), Jan Panteltje, 05:57
Kadiatcha_Girrl... What happened to your bots ?, Jeff…Relf, 05:56
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Joe Jakarta, 05:53
Re: perpetuum mobile success story, dedanoe, 05:50
Re: perpetuum mobile success story, dedanoe, 05:40
Re: Pulse Function, john, 05:40
Re: A word about most of you :-), Crank Hunter, 05:23
Re: Which version of it? :-), tadchem, 05:20
Re: Crank_Seeker's phallus is a wee fallacy., Crank Hunter, 05:18
Crank_Seeker's phallus is a wee fallacy., Jeff…Relf, 05:13
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Crank Hunter, 05:12
Re: StarGate is a documentory ?, Crank Hunter, 05:05
StarGate is a documentory ?, Jeff…Relf, 04:58
Re: LITS ALERT: Re: Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit, CranksMustDie, 04:46
Re: Which version of it? :-), Crank Hunter, 04:44
Re: Twenty Five minutes? :-), Crank Hunter, 04:43
Re: What's your job, Crank_Seeker ?, Crank Hunter, 04:41
Re: T_Wake's instantly vanishing universe., Crank Hunter, 04:38
Re: T_Wake's instantly vanishing universe., Crank Hunter, 04:30
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 04:29
What's your job, Crank_Seeker ?, Jeff…Relf, 04:29
Re: Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you., CrankHunter, 04:02
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 81: Sir Isaac and Leibniz Come Out Ahead of Fermat in Nonrenormalization Exponentiation, OsherD, 03:38
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 81: Sir Isaac and Leibniz Come Out Ahead of Fermat in Nonrenormalization Exponentiation, OsherD, 03:24
Re: Pulse Function, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 02:40
Re: Pulse Function, j . alexander . hawkins, 02:21
Re: Pulse Function, j . alexander . hawkins, 02:10
Re: A word about most of you :-), Math Freak, 01:28
Which version of it? :-), Math Freak, 01:23
Twenty Five minutes? :-), Math Freak, 00:59
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 00:44
Job opening for physics outreach, Clint Sprott, 00:43
T_Wake's instantly vanishing universe., Jeff…Relf, 00:41
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, Dennis B, 00:31
Porous materials can have unusual properties, Sam Wormley, 00:20

June 29, 2006

Re: Squeezin' Balls in Those Hallowed Halls -- Oh, My Achin' Testacles!, donstockbauer, 23:51
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, Dennis B, 23:51
Re: Squeezin' Balls in Those Hallowed Halls -- Oh, My Achin' Testacles!, donstockbauer, 23:48
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 23:45
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Richard Schultz, 23:44
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 23:44
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, Dennis B, 23:18
Re: Exclusive Video of 1969 MOON LANDING, edconrad, 22:04
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 21:58
Re: Pulse Function, Greg Hansen, 21:28
Re: Emotional Forces?, platopes, 20:37
Re: How Refrigerators Work, W. Watson, 20:21
Re: Emotional Forces?, platopes, 20:17
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:08
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 20:03
ORBITAL MOTION WITHOUT A FORCE, ACE, 19:48
Re: Principle of greatest time, Jim Black, 19:45
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:53
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 18:52
Re: Exclusive Video of 1969 MOON LANDING, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:39
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:38
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 18:35
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 18:34
Re: Exclusive Video of 1969 MOON LANDING, Starlord, 18:31
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 18:30
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 18:28
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:28
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:26
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 18:25
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 18:22
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:20
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 18:19
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:17
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 18:07
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 18:05
Re: EMF inducing Fluorescent Effects, Timo Nieminen, 18:02
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 80: 1 + y - x Conversion of QM E = hv, OsherD, 17:34
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, tadchem, 17:28
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 80: 1 + y - x Conversion of QM E = hv, OsherD, 17:23
Re: Functioning of a quantum network., Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:23
Re: Principle of greatest time, tadchem, 17:19
Re: Exclusive Video of 1969 MOON LANDING, Double-A, 17:13
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, T Wake, 16:46
Re: EMF inducing Fluorescent Effects, tadchem, 16:43
Principle of greatest time, gmarkowsky, 16:43
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 16:41
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:35
Re: Exclusive Video of 1969 MOON LANDING, T Wake, 16:35
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 16:34
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, T Wake, 16:33
Re: Exclusive Video of 1969 MOON LANDING, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:30
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 16:29
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:16
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 15:46
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, actionintegral, 15:44
Re: Exclusive Video of 1969 MOON LANDING, CWatters, 15:42
Re: perpetuum mobile success story, CWatters, 15:37
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 15:32
Re: Emotional Forces?, Verity (previously Violet), 15:02
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 14:59
Re: Exclusive Video of 1969 MOON LANDING, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:58
Re: Exclusive Video of 1969 MOON LANDING, Paul Cardinale, 14:56
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79.1: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem", Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 14:55
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:53
Re: Emotional Forces?, Verity (previously Violet), 14:52
Re: Emotional Forces?, Verity (previously Violet), 14:52
Re: Scientific Errors (Proof), Dennis B, 14:50
Re: Emotional Forces?, Verity (previously Violet), 14:49
Re: How Refrigerators Work, Paul Cardinale, 14:48
gravity a fictional force in Atom Totality Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, a_plutonium, 14:47
How Refrigerators Work, W. Watson, 14:36
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:33
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:32
Re: Emotional Forces?, Rock Brentwood, 14:32
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Andy Resnick, 14:29
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:27
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 14:26
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:24
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:12
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:11
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 14:01
Re: Exclusive Video of 1969 MOON LANDING, malibu, 13:42
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 13:40
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, GSS, 13:31
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:27
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Eric Gisse, 13:24
Re: Scientific Errors (Proof), blair . houghton, 13:23
Re: I have the people skills to match my computing skills., Eric Gisse, 13:22
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:08
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, T Wake, 13:08
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, Dennis B, 13:07
Re: Emotional Forces?, Randy Poe, 13:06
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Y.Porat, 12:58
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, Dennis B, 12:57
Re: Pulse Function, Martin, 12:51
Re: Comparing gravity to human emotions., T Wake, 12:46
Re: Consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys _Everything_., T Wake, 12:45
Re: Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems., T Wake, 12:45
Re: I have the people skills to match my computing skills., T Wake, 12:43
Re: Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems., T Wake, 12:37
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Randy Poe, 12:31
Re: Entropy can be modeled as an expansion of spacetime over cosmological time., T Wake, 12:30
Re: It'd be a waste of my time to try to explain every little thing., T Wake, 12:14
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:46
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:45
Re: Stop the "1 degree temperature increase" LIE. Stop psychopathically Lying!, Rene Tschaggelar, 11:36
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, actionintegral, 11:30
Re: Non Contact (Optical) Pyrometer & Exhaust Gas Temperature, mrmain, 11:21
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, Externet, 10:47
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 10:43
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, John C . Polasek, 10:35
Re: Scientific Errors, Thomas Smid, 10:34
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 10:26
Shit Eater Koobee Wublee, dda1, 10:01
Re: A word about most of you :-), Mark L. Fergerson, 09:56
Re: Loop or string theory?, Verity (previously Violet), 09:51
Re: Loop or string theory?, Verity (previously Violet), 09:48
Re: Loop or string theory?, Verity (previously Violet), 09:39
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, David Bostwick, 09:27
Re: perpetuum mobile success story, Dr Photon, 09:23
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 09:08
Re: perpetuum mobile success story, dedanoe, 09:06
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Y.Porat, 09:00
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Roy L . Fuchs, 08:45
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, PD, 08:42
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Andy Resnick, 08:29
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, Dennis B, 08:19
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, Dennis B, 08:18
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, Dennis B, 08:16
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:05
Re: Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:00
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:59
Re: Exclusive Video of 1969 MOON LANDING, Raving Loonie, 07:57
Re: I have the people skills to match my computing skills., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:55
Re: Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:53
Re: Entropy can be modeled as an expansion of spacetime over cosmological time., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:44
"The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Dlo, 07:44
Re: It'd be a waste of my time to try to explain every little thing., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:37
Re: perpetuum mobile success story, Dr Photon, 07:17
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, Richard Herring, 07:17
Exclusive Video of 1969 MOON LANDING, Ed Conrad, 06:53
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Y.Porat, 06:17
Compton effect is a Doppler effect, h_v_ansari, 06:06
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Y.Porat, 05:58
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, jmfbahciv, 05:50
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, jmfbahciv, 05:46
Re: EMF inducing Fluorescent Effects, Jan Panteltje, 05:46
perpetuum mobile success story, dedanoe, 05:46
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, jmfbahciv, 05:43
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, tadchem, 05:40
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Jan Panteltje, 05:38
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, tadchem, 05:35
Entropy can be modeled as an expansion of spacetime over cosmological time., Jeff…Relf, 05:35
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Aleksandr Timofeev, 05:30
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, jmfbahciv, 05:29
Re: Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems., Richard Herring, 05:22
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Jan Panteltje, 05:21
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:19
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:12
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:09
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:37
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Tom Potter, 04:27
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Roy L . Fuchs, 03:35
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, platopes, 03:22
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Koobee Wublee, 03:11
Re: Emotional Forces?, platopes, 03:07
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 03:05
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Tom Potter, 02:26
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 02:08
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Y.Porat, 02:05
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79.1: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem", OsherD, 02:00
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 01:56
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 01:53
Re: Entropy is the top God., G. L. Bradford, 01:39
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:12
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Y.Porat, 00:55
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Roy L . Fuchs, 00:53
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Roy L . Fuchs, 00:52
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, mmeron, 00:31
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, mmeron, 00:14
Re: WTC explosion-plume TRAJECTORY -- 911, LarryG, 00:06

June 28, 2006

Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 23:46
(On studying Fine Particle Physics) Quote from Rev. 3.2 of 'Standard Behavior Of Criminal Minds' - {HRI 20030509-V3.2}, Leonardo Been, 23:39
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79.1: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem", OsherD, 23:30
Comparing gravity to human emotions., Jeff…Relf, 23:20
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79.1: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem", OsherD, 23:15
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79.1: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem", OsherD, 23:05
I have the people skills to match my computing skills., Jeff…Relf, 22:45
Re: Pulse Function, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 22:45
Consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys _Everything_., Jeff…Relf, 22:26
method to sort semiconductor carbon nanotubes by size, Sam Wormley, 22:22
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem", OsherD, 22:19
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 22:19
Re: Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems., Eric Gisse, 22:08
Re: Pulse Function, Martin, 22:05
Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems., Jeff…Relf, 22:02
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 21:45
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem", Zodness, 21:31
Re: Electric force and charge, JoeT, 21:30
Re: Emotional Forces?, Zodness, 21:28
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem", OsherD, 21:26
Re: It'd be a waste of my time to try to explain every little thing., Eric Gisse, 21:21
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Jesse Spencer, 21:01
Study Shows San Andreas Primed for Major Quake, Sam Wormley, 20:37
It'd be a waste of my time to try to explain every little thing., Jeff…Relf, 20:31
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 20:07
Re: A Hydrogen Suitcase, tadchem, 19:55
Re: Entropy is the top God., Eric Gisse, 19:50
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, tadchem, 19:45
Re: Some advice on table I made.., T Wake, 19:16
Re: Entropy is the top God., T Wake, 19:14
Re: Entropy is the top God., T Wake, 19:11
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 78: dy/dt = ky(1 + y), Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 19:05
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 18:59
Re: Relativistic_Mass, T Wake, 18:59
Re: Protecting your Energy - How to defend yourself against l. ron hubbard (during your sleep) raping your body and soul to get your Energy - (short note - Version 2), I'm not gonna tell ya, 18:27
Re: Gravitational_Waves, Gravity_Waves, Gravitational_Radiation., Eric Gisse, 18:15
Protecting your Energy - How to defend yourself against l. ron hubbard (during your sleep) raping your body and soul to get your Energy - (short note - Version 2), Leonardo Been, 17:48
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 17:44
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 17:35
Re: the simplest system of units of measure, T Wake, 17:28
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, platopes, 17:28
Re: What caused that expansion/cooling ? wasn't it dark energy ? and lots of it., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:18
Re: Relativistic_Mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:17
Re: Gravitational_Waves, Gravity_Waves, Gravitational_Radiation., T Wake, 17:16
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:15
Re: Relativistic_Mass, T Wake, 17:14
Re: What caused that expansion/cooling ? wasn't it dark energy ? and lots of it., T Wake, 17:13
Re: .00038 giga years = 380,000 years., T Wake, 17:12
Re: Looking at the opaque walls., T Wake, 17:11
Re: Electric force and charge, malibu, 17:07
Re: Clueless Gisse., T Wake, 17:05
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 17:04
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 16:59
Re: Who's life do you think I'm living now ?, T Wake, 16:53
Re: Looking for The_Hard_Hookup., T Wake, 16:52
Re: Emotional Forces?, platopes, 16:52
Re: A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, BrJohan, 16:39
Re: Emotional Forces?, platopes, 16:34
Re: A Hydrogen Suitcase, cnctut, 16:30
Re: EMF inducing Fluorescent Effects, tadchem, 16:21
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 16:18
Re: Emotional Forces?, platopes, 16:17
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 16:13
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, platopes, 16:06
Re: EMF inducing Fluorescent Effects, Sivas09, 16:01
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Ken S. Tucker, 16:00
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:51
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:46
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Andy Resnick, 15:42
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Sam Wormley, 15:42
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 15:40
A Hydrogen Suitcase, Sam Wormley, 15:40
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:40
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:32
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Jan Panteltje, 15:29
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:25
Re: Electric force and charge, Jan Panteltje, 15:21
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Jan Panteltje, 15:19
Re: Pulse Function, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 15:15
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Jan Panteltje, 15:14
Re: Functioning of a quantum network., dwickford, 15:14
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, PD, 15:06
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Sam Wormley, 15:05
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Jan Panteltje, 15:00
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Jan Panteltje, 14:57
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 14:48
Re: Some advice on table I made.., Martin Hogbin, 14:38
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, FrediFizzx, 14:34
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:33
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 14:19
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 14:05
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 13:53
Pulse Function, Martin, 13:33
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, GSS, 13:30
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:22
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, mmeron, 13:13
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:10
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Greg Hansen, 13:06
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 12:56
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Mike, 12:54
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Igor, 12:40
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Sorcerer, 12:36
Re: Emotional Forces?, BD, 12:34
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, Greg Hansen, 12:32
Re: Electric force and charge, Igor, 12:29
Re: Emotional Forces?, Igor, 12:25
Re: Emotional Forces?, Randy Poe, 12:25
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79: Superposition, Phases, Linearity, Zodness, 12:03
Re: Emotional Forces?, Zodness, 12:01
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:01
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 12:01
Re: Electric force and charge, malibu, 12:00
Re: Entropy is the top God., Robibnikoff, 11:56
Re: Scientific Errors (Proof), Dennis B, 11:48
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 11:44
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 11:43
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Sam Wormley, 11:41
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 11:39
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 11:38
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Sam Wormley, 11:38
Emotional Forces?, platopes, 11:34
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 11:29
Re: Electric force and charge, Jan Panteltje, 11:26
Re: Scientific Errors (Proof), Dennis B, 11:24
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Jan Panteltje, 11:23
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Jan Panteltje, 11:21
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, platopes, 11:13
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Sam Wormley, 10:47
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:22
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, actionintegral, 10:16
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 10:08
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 09:49
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 09:45
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 09:33
Re: Space Travel consequences, Brad Guth, 09:28
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Schoenfeld, 09:26
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 09:26
"The Einstein Hoax", Dlo, 09:24
Non Contact (Optical) Pyrometer & Exhaust Gas Temperature, mrmain, 09:19
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Y.Porat, 09:18
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Richard Saam, 09:15
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 09:12
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Y.Porat, 09:10
Re: Electric force and charge, Sam Wormley, 09:00
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Andy Resnick, 08:59
Re: Scientific Errors (Proof), Dennis B, 08:57
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 08:38
Electric force and charge, JoeT, 08:07
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 07:51
Entropy is the top God., Jeff…Relf, 07:20
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Y.Porat, 07:15
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Jan Panteltje, 06:51
Re: EMF inducing Fluorescent Effects, Jan Panteltje, 06:50
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 06:42
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Rene Tschaggelar, 06:39
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, jmfbahciv, 06:32
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Tom Potter, 05:37
Re: PING FNVW (Re: GAB NOMINATION: Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this...), Colonel Jake TM, 05:34
Re: US Supreme Court to Tackle Warming, jmfbahciv, 05:33
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Tom Potter, 05:31
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:25
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:24
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:19
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:16
Re: curses, Richard Herring, 04:57
Re: traveling witouth moving, dedanoe, 04:49
Re: friction problem, tadchem, 04:31
Re: EMF inducing Fluorescent Effects, tadchem, 04:25
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 78: dy/dt = ky(1 + y), OsherD, 04:18
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79: Superposition, Phases, Linearity, OsherD, 03:39
Re: The proof of mass vector., Bilge, 03:38
Re: Entropy is the top God., Phineas T Puddleduck, 03:37
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Martin Brown, 03:36
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79: Superposition, Phases, Linearity, OsherD, 03:24
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Y.Porat, 03:00
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Roy L . Fuchs, 02:48
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Roy L . Fuchs, 02:47
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, FrediFizzx, 02:07
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Y.Porat, 02:02
Re: Quantum Bomb - x-dimensional harmonic oscillator zero point energy of a vortex, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 02:00
Entropy is the top God., Jeff…Relf, 00:35
Quantum Bomb - x-dimensional harmonic oscillator zero point energy of a vortex, switzerland qunatium computer, 00:31
Re: atmospheric pressures, mmeron, 00:24

June 27, 2006

Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Jesse Spencer, 23:51
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Jesse Spencer, 23:43
GPS TRACKS EARTH'S INSTANTANEOUS POLE, Sam Wormley, 23:23
Re: atmospheric pressures, Llanzlan Klazmon, 23:18
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Tom Potter, 22:27
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Sam Wormley, 21:41
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Eric Gisse, 21:36
Re: atmospheric pressures, mmeron, 21:05
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Tom Ring, 20:24
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 20:21
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 19:59
Re: atmospheric pressures, mrdarrett, 19:56
Re: atmospheric pressures, mmeron, 19:48
Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, Sam Wormley, 19:43
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 19:41
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, malibu, 19:40
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Tom Ring, 19:36
atmospheric pressures, mrdarrett, 19:31
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:24
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 19:20
Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?, PD, 19:17
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, PD, 18:52
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 18:45
Re: Looking for The_Hard_Hookup., Eric Gisse, 18:30
Re: How likely is an ever-constant cosmological constant ( w = -1 ) ?, Eric Gisse, 18:29
Re: Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you., Eric Gisse, 18:29
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Eric Gisse, 18:26
Functioning of a quantum network., dwickford, 18:10
Re: puzzle, Sorcerer, 18:01
Re: EMF inducing Fluorescent Effects, Sorcerer, 17:58
Re: US Supreme Court to Tackle Warming, Jan Panteltje, 17:40
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 17:35
Re: US Supreme Court to Tackle Warming, Jan Panteltje, 17:35
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, Eric Gisse, 17:33
Re: Hydraulic Presses and Force, tadchem, 17:31
Re: US Supreme Court to Tackle Warming, Jan Panteltje, 17:23
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Sorcerer, 17:23
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Llanzlan Klazmon, 17:20
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, David Bostwick, 17:19
Re: US Supreme Court to Tackle Warming, Paul Ciszek, 17:11
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:04
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Roy L . Fuchs, 17:03
Re: puzzle, donstockbauer, 16:46
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jimp, 16:45
Re: Video Evidence of WTC collapse, mike4ty4, 16:36
Re: EMF inducing Fluorescent Effects, Paul Ciszek, 16:34
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 16:20
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, jimz, 16:07
Re: friction problem, pocmatos, 16:02
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, Sam Wormley, 15:54
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 15:28
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Richard Saam, 15:25
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 15:17
Re: puzzle, Martin, 15:11
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, Photo Guy, 15:10
Re: Metric Dictionary?, Hatunen, 14:45
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:40
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:36
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, Waffa, 14:29
Re: US Supreme Court to Tackle Warming, Jan Panteltje, 14:27
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, John C . Polasek, 14:23
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, John C . Polasek, 14:15
Re: curses, Igor, 14:07
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, John C . Polasek, 14:01
Re: US Supreme Court to Tackle Warming, greysky, 14:00
US Supreme Court to Tackle Warming, Sam Wormley, 13:46
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 13:46
Re: friction problem, mcldias, 13:30
Re: friction problem, boson boss, 13:29
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, GSS, 13:24
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, GSS, 12:58
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 12:55
Re: Scientific Errors (Proof), blair . houghton, 12:49
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Charlie Gibbs, 12:33
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 12:32
Re: puzzle, BD, 12:29
Re: the simplest system of units of measure, donaldsauter, 12:21
Re: The proof of mass vector., Bilge, 12:21
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, donstockbauer, 12:20
Re: the simplest system of units of measure, donaldsauter, 12:13
Re: Scientific Errors, blair . houghton, 12:10
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 12:03
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 11:49
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 11:46
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 11:42
Re: puzzle, Sam Wormley, 11:41
Re: friction problem, PD, 11:39
Re: Hydraulic Presses and Force, Dennis B, 11:30
puzzle, Vichu, 11:28
Re: friction problem, mcldias, 11:26
Re: friction problem, mcldias, 11:26
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:25
EMF inducing Fluorescent Effects, Sivas09, 11:17
Re: Gravitational_Waves, Gravity_Waves, Gravitational_Radiation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:03
Gravitational_Waves, Gravity_Waves, Gravitational_Radiation., Jeff…Relf, 11:02
Re: friction problem, PD, 11:00
Re: Clueless Gisse., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:58
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:58
Clueless Gisse., Jeff…Relf, 10:57
Re: Hydraulic Presses and Force, PD, 10:56
Re: friction problem, mcldias, 10:56
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:55
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, esmartguy, 10:53
.00038 giga years = 380,000 years., Jeff…Relf, 10:51
Re: friction problem, mcldias, 10:50
Re: Relativistic_Mass, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:49
Relativistic_Mass, Jeff…Relf, 10:47
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, John C . Polasek, 10:41
Re: curses, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:40
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:37
Hydraulic Presses and Force, Dennis B, 10:34
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:33
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 10:30
Re: What caused that expansion/cooling ? wasn't it dark energy ? and lots of it., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:29
Re: Looking at the opaque walls., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:27
What caused that expansion/cooling ? wasn't it dark energy ? and lots of it., Jeff…Relf, 10:26
Re: friction problem, PD, 10:25
Re: Looking at the opaque walls., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:25
Hydraulic Presses and Force, Dennis B, 10:24
Re: Who's life do you think I'm living now ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:24
Who's life do you think I'm living now ?, Jeff…Relf, 10:15
friction problem, mcldias, 10:14
Looking at the opaque walls., Jeff…Relf, 10:06
Re: relatively confusing, PD, 10:02
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Tom Ring, 10:02
Re: Looking for The_Hard_Hookup., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:36
Re: Looking for The_Hard_Hookup., Jeff…Relf, 09:35
Re: What the hell were you trying to model ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:35
THE UNIFIED THEORY, ACE, 09:35
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, Sam Wormley, 09:34
Re: What the hell were you trying to model ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:31
What the hell were you trying to model ?, Jeff…Relf, 09:20
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 782 June 27, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 09:19
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 09:15
Either mars is too cold, venus is too hot, or we're too picky., Jeff…Relf, 09:11
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 09:02
Re: How find focal length of lens at home?, PD, 08:42
Re: At Omega_Lambda = .75, dark energy dominates., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:40
"The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Dlo, 08:40
How find focal length of lens at home?, Waffa, 08:39
Re: At Omega_Lambda = .75, dark energy dominates., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:38
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:33
Re: How likely is an ever-constant cosmological constant ( w = -1 ) ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:33
At Omega_Lambda = .75, dark energy dominates., Jeff…Relf, 08:33
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, jmfbahciv, 08:31
Re: How likely is an ever-constant cosmological constant ( w = -1 ) ?, T Wake, 08:31
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Mike, 08:26
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 08:23
Re: Scientific Errors, nyscof, 08:22
Re: traveling witouth moving, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:22
Re: How likely is an ever-constant cosmological constant ( w = -1 ) ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:21
Re: Scale_Factor, H = a( t, w, Omega_lambda, Omega_CDM and Omega_m ), Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:18
Re: How likely is an ever-constant cosmological constant ( w = -1 ) ?, T Wake, 08:18
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, jmfbahciv, 08:18
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, jmfbahciv, 08:13
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 08:13
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 08:10
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 08:07
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 08:05
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 08:04
Scale_Factor, H = a( t, w, Omega_lambda, Omega_CDM and Omega_m ), Jeff…Relf, 08:02
Re: Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you., T Wake, 07:56
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:39
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:37
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, PD, 07:35
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:33
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:30
dedanoe defines trajectory, dedanoe, 07:29
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 07:27
traveling witouth moving, dedanoe, 07:23
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 07:19
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 07:02
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, jmfbahciv, 06:49
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, jmfbahciv, 06:47
Re: How likely is an ever-constant cosmological constant ( w = -1 ) ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:28
Re: Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:16
Re: How likely is an ever-constant cosmological constant ( w = -1 ) ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:15
Re: How likely is an ever-constant cosmological constant ( w = -1 ) ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:14
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, tadchem, 05:42
Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you., Jeff…Relf, 05:24
How likely is an ever-constant cosmological constant ( w = -1 ) ?, Jeff…Relf, 04:59
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 04:11
Unifications of entropies, kunzmilan, 04:07
John Cramer's Back FROM The Future Machine, Jack Sarfatti, 02:49
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 02:45
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Mike, 02:38
Re: Otherwise the candle in Nell's sauce might seek some clever exits., Mike Dembroge, 01:42
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 01:14
Halo nuclei, Sam Wormley, 00:48
Re: Maggie, still expecting, laughs almost badly, as the tape scolds at their tree., Chadwick Stone, 00:46
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 00:46
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 00:43
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, kumar, 00:25
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 00:23
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Tom Potter, 00:13

June 26, 2006

Re: Pale swirls on the surface of the Moon, Eric Gisse, 23:53
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Llanzlan Klazmon, 23:52
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 23:51
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 23:50
Re: Scientific Errors, PD, 23:18
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Art Deco, 22:57
Pale swirls on the surface of the Moon, Sam Wormley, 22:38
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 22:33
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Skywise, 22:25
Re: "Seeing" X-rays, Dahearta Aliabia, 22:09
Re: SCI.PHYSICS, YOUR ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:07
Re: SCI.PHYSICS, YOUR ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:06
Re: Simple Exercise - Jet Engine, Mass of Air Thru Turbine, mmeron, 21:51
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 21:43
Re: The proof of mass vector., yen, ka-in, 21:37
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, mmeron, 21:36
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, Greg Hansen, 20:44
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, *nemo*, 20:44
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, *nemo*, 20:42
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Mike, 20:31
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Starlord, 20:22
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Greywolf, 20:22
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 20:19
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 20:06
Re: "Seeing" X-rays, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:01
"Seeing" X-rays, mike3, 19:47
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Llanzlan Klazmon, 18:48
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:44
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:43
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:40
Re: Can energy impact solids?, wate, 18:38
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 18:34
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, raven1, 18:31
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 18:29
Re: Even Newton Could Make up his mind which bible to use., Llanzlan Klazmon, 18:23
Re: Classical vs. Quantum?, dweller, 18:14
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, jimp, 18:05
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Randy Poe, 18:03
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Skywise, 17:57
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Tom Ring, 17:43
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 17:38
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 17:37
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, John C . Polasek, 17:35
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, R. Pierce Butler, 17:25
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jimp, 17:25
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 17:10
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, Timo A. Nieminen, 17:07
Re: SCI.PHYSICS, YOUR ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, hhc314, 17:06
Re: Even Newton Could Make up his mind which bible to use., quibbler, 17:04
Re: SCI.PHYSICS, YOUR ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Dahearta Aliabia, 16:43
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Eeyore, 16:33
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, David Bostwick, 16:21
SCI.PHYSICS, YOUR ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, borje, 16:11
SCI.PHYSICS, YOUR ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, borje, 16:11
New: mind reading computers, Jan Panteltje, 15:58
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 15:46
Re: LIst of threads by Danilo J Bonsignore, donstockbauer, 15:39
Simple Exercise - Jet Engine, Mass of Air Thru Turbine, BrainDumb, 15:37
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Bret Cahill, 15:35
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, curtvon, 15:32
Re: Antinuclear call to arms, Math Freak, 15:31
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, donstockbauer, 15:31
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, Greg Hansen, 15:24
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, cnctut, 15:17
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, David Bostwick, 15:06
Re: Somebody whining? :-), T Wake, 14:54
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 14:38
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 14:37
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 14:35
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol, jimp, 14:35
Re: Somebody whining? :-), Math Freak, 14:31
Re: Somebody whining? :-), Math Freak, 14:25
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, Eric Gisse, 14:21
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, R. Pierce Butler, 14:18
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian, 14:17
Re: RETARD ALERT!!!!! Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Uncle Clover, 14:14
Energy Cost of Ethanol, Greg Hansen, 13:40
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Harry F . Leopold, 13:35
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Shawn, 13:32
Re: Scientific Errors, blair . houghton, 13:28
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Matt Silberstein, 13:27
Re: Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 13:18
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, Andy Resnick, 12:57
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Bret Cahill, 12:56
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 12:51
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, GSS, 12:44
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, mmeron, 12:36
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Martin Brown, 12:35
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje, 12:29
IN ENGLISCH:A table of Mechanics. Schema:, NILS B�RJESSON, 12:26
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Igor, 12:25
IN SWEDISCH:Mekanikens indelning. Schema:, NILS B�RJESSON, 12:23
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 12:15
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, blair . houghton, 12:01
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:01
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, esmartguy, 11:59
Re: Even Newton Could Make up his mind which bible to use., blair . houghton, 11:54
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:50
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, blair . houghton, 11:46
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jimp, 11:45
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:44
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:43
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, blair . houghton, 11:42
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, esmartguy, 11:41
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 11:14
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 11:06
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 11:04
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, jcon, 10:51
Re: Can energy impact solids?, Randy Poe, 10:51
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 10:43
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Josh Miles, 10:42
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, Andy Resnick, 10:38
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 10:26
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Aage Andersen, 10:25
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:17
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, PD, 10:13
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, PD, 10:11
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, PD, 10:09
RETARD ALERT!!!!! Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, jtem01, 10:04
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, T Wake, 10:04
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:00
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 09:57
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:53
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 09:53
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Enkidu, 09:52
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, actionintegral, 09:50
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 09:46
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 09:44
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:42
Re: Even Newton Could Make up his mind which bible to use., quibbler, 09:41
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 09:41
Re: Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:40
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, kumar, 09:38
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje, 09:38
Understanding Bernoulli's Equation, actionintegral, 09:30
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 09:23
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:17
Re: Can energy impact solids?, wate, 09:17
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, Andy Resnick, 09:05
Re: Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, Parsifal, 09:05
Isaac Newton owned 30 versions of the Bible, FED UP, 08:50
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, Andy Resnick, 08:41
Re: relatively confusing, Harry, 08:32
"The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Dlo, 08:31
Re: The visible surface of the birth of the CMB., T Wake, 07:53
Re: Somebody whining? :-), T Wake, 07:43
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:37
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, malibu, 07:36
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 07:29
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 07:22
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 06:57
Re: THE GRAVITON DOESNT EXIST, Roy L . Fuchs, 06:43
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 06:22
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, Lloyd Parker, 06:09
Re: brain physics, Ian Parker, 06:02
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jmfbahciv, 05:38
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 26, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:38
Re: The visible surface of the birth of the CMB., CrankHater, 05:16
Re: Can energy impact solids?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:55
Re: Somebody whining? :-), CrankHater, 04:46
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, CrankHater, 04:36
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, wate, 04:36
Re: Can energy impact solids?, wate, 04:18
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 04:00
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 03:58
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales., Ken S. Tucker, 03:31
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, kumar, 03:28
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 03:21
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 02:28
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, mmeron, 02:25
Re: The proof of mass vector., Bilge, 01:49
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 01:42
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 01:41
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 01:40
Re: relatively confusing, noshellswill, 01:30
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 01:26
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Eeyore, 00:43
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, jimp, 00:25

June 25, 2006

Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Dahearta Aliabia, 23:29
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 78: dy/dt = ky(1 + y), Dahearta Aliabia, 23:26
Re: Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Bret Cahill, 23:24
Re: The visible surface of the birth of the CMB., Eric Gisse, 23:22
Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 23:21
Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure, Radium, 23:18
Re: GRAVITATION, Y.Porat, 23:17
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 23:14
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, John C . Polasek, 23:05
The visible surface of the birth of the CMB., Jeff…Relf, 22:51
Re: Somebody whining? :-), Math Freak, 22:31
Re: GRAVITATION, PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 22:22
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 22:20
Re: GRAVITATION, PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 22:16
Re: GRAVITATION, FrediFizzx, 22:14
Re: GRAVITATION, PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 22:11
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 22:10
Re: Radionics and Orgone Technology, hhc314, 22:07
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 21:45
Re: GRAVITATION, FrediFizzx, 21:38
A Small Miracle, stargene, 21:19
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:15
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:01
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:00
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 78: dy/dt = ky(1 + y), OsherD, 20:52
Re: A word about most of you :-), Eric Gisse, 20:40
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Art Deco, 20:35
Re: takes 1.5 gallons gasoline to produce 1 gallon ethanol in modern agriculture, mmeron, 20:30
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 20:22
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 78: dy/dt = ky(1 + y), OsherD, 20:10
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 20:08
Re: The proof of mass vector., yen, ka-in, 20:01
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:53
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:51
Re: A word about most of you :-), T Wake, 19:32
Re: Your "Domestic Terrorists" of tomorrow :-), T Wake, 19:29
Re: Somebody whining? :-), T Wake, 19:29
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 19:24
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 19:16
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 19:14
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 19:08
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 19:04
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 18:58
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 18:58
Radionics and Orgone Technology, streetsanto@xxxxxxxxx, 18:54
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 18:45
Re: GRAVITATION, Sue..., 18:41
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 18:41
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, FrediFizzx, 18:00
Re: GRAVITATION, FrediFizzx, 17:52
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:36
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Mike, 17:30
Re: GRAVITATION, Sue..., 17:23
Re: GRAVITATION, FrediFizzx, 17:10
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 16:47
Re: Somebody whining? :-), mike3, 16:41
Re: gyro power generator, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 16:40
Re: Your "Domestic Terrorists" of tomorrow :-), donstockbauer, 16:30
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:07
Re: GRAVITATION, FrediFizzx, 16:06
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:58
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:57
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 15:50
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 15:40
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, PD, 15:36
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 15:32
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 15:30
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Bilge, 15:26
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:19
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 15:16
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:16
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:10
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:09
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 15:03
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 15:02
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, Bilge, 14:55
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:54
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:48
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 14:46
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:44
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 14:44
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 14:42
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 14:42
Re: LHC due for 2007 start, greysky, 14:38
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:34
Re: ACS on HST broken?, Starlord, 14:32
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:31
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 14:29
Your "Domestic Terrorists" of tomorrow :-), Math Freak, 14:20
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 14:18
Re: GRAVITATION, FrediFizzx, 14:08
A word about most of you :-), Math Freak, 13:59
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 13:57
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 13:51
Re: LHC due for 2007 start, FrediFizzx, 13:47
ACS on HST broken?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:42
Re: curses, Igor, 13:40
Re: Somebody whining? :-), Math Freak, 13:34
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 13:30
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 13:29
Somebody whining? :-), Math Freak, 13:23
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, John C . Polasek, 13:08
Re: universal forces, JoeT, 12:09
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 12:02
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, malibu, 11:57
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 77: The Universe as a Superposition of Two Real Normalized Phases x ( > = 0) or y( > = 0) and 1 - x or 1 - y, OsherD, 11:28
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, kumar, 11:27
Re: NOMINATION for Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science Award, Sorcerer, 11:26
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:25
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:22
Re: GRAVITATION, Y.Porat, 11:18
Re: How big would it have to be?, jimp, 11:15
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 11:06
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 10:58
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:42
Re: GRAVITATION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:36
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 10:33
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:33
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 10:28
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:21
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:10
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:09
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 10:04
Re: NOMINATION for Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science Award, tdp1001, 09:51
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 09:47
Re: Einstein, mind's voyage, speed of light and time, tdp1001, 09:43
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 09:43
Re: Any alternatives for conventional gasoline?, Don Lancaster, 09:35
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 09:33
Re: Any alternatives for conventional gasoline?, dedanoe, 09:14
Re: Einstein, mind's voyage, speed of light and time, dedanoe, 09:11
Re: gyro power generator, Bernhard Kuemel, 09:11
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:09
Re: universal forces, dedanoe, 09:07
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:03
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 08:58
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:55
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:54
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:49
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:48
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:46
Re: NOMINATION for Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science Award, Sorcerer, 08:23
Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, T Wake, 08:20
"How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Egap, 08:19
Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, T Wake, 08:19
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, T Wake, 08:19
"How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Egap, 08:19
Re: THE GRAVITON DOESNT EXIST, T Wake, 08:17
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Sorcerer, 08:09
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 08:07
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 08:02
Re: New way to factor?, Jan Panteltje, 07:59
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, wate, 07:57
Re: New way to factor?, T Wake, 07:53
Re: New way to factor?, T Wake, 07:52
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, wate, 07:52
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Y.Porat, 07:31
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, PD, 07:22
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, PD, 07:11
The Moving Dimensions problem, NR, 07:02
Re: THE GRAVITON DOESNT EXIST, Eric Gisse, 06:59
Re: Einstein, mind's voyage, speed of light and time, G. L. Bradford, 06:51
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 06:20
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, wate, 06:16
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 06:16
THE GRAVITON DOESNT EXIST, ACE, 06:06
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 06:04
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, kumar, 05:58
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 05:45
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 05:35
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 05:34
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, kumar, 05:33
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 04:41
How big would it have to be?, mike3, 04:38
Re: LHC due for 2007 start, greysky, 04:21
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, wate, 04:15
If the history of Maxwell Eq. had been thermodynamics Re: is entropy the Faraday law analog or the Ampere law analog Re:, a_plutonium, 03:45
Re: You can catch THEM :-), Bob Cain, 03:37
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 76: 1/(1 + y - x) and Feynman Again, donstockbauer, 03:36
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, kumar, 03:20
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, kumar, 03:12
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 76: 1/(1 + y - x) and Feynman Again, OsherD, 02:57
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, wate, 02:40
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, wate, 02:10
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, GSS, 02:08
Re: GRAVITATION, FrediFizzx, 02:05
Re: GRAVITATION, kirov, 01:47
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, wate, 01:46
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 01:34
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 76: 1/(1 + y - x) and Feynman Again, OsherD, 01:32
Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Y.Porat, 01:21
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, kumar, 01:10
Re: LHC due for 2007 start, FrediFizzx, 00:53
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, wate, 00:40

June 24, 2006

Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, kumar, 23:51
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, wate, 23:47
Re: LHC due for 2007 start, greysky, 23:43
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, kumar, 23:09
Re: is entropy the Faraday law analog or the Ampere law analog Re:, boson boss, 22:44
Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Sam Wormley, 22:44
On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, yinbing-zhou, 22:34
Re: New way to factor?, Flonker KO0ks out..., 22:31
Re: Einstein, mind's voyage, speed of light and time, Tom Potter, 21:30
Re: New way to factor?, Mohab, 21:25
Re: New way to factor?, Mohab, 21:24
Re: gyro power generator, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 21:13
Re: New way to factor?, mmeron, 21:08
Re: NOMINATION for Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science Award, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:15
Re: NOMINATION for Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science Award, Roy L . Fuchs, 20:12
Re: New way to factor?, cnctut, 19:50
Re: New way to factor?, jstevh, 19:49
Re: New way to factor?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:46
Re: New way to factor?, mmeron, 19:43
Re: brain physics, Scotius, 19:43
Re: New way to factor?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:42
Re: New way to factor?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:41
Re: Why sending a signal, or travel, back in time can't be done, , 19:36
Re: New way to factor?, Richard Tobin, 19:31
Re: New way to factor?, mmeron, 19:29
Re: New way to factor?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:27
Re: New way to factor?, mmeron, 19:27
Re: New way to factor?, Bernhard Kuemel, 19:21
Re: New way to factor?, T Wake, 19:11
Re: New way to factor?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:09
Re: New way to factor?, T Wake, 19:08
Re: New way to factor?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:07
Re: New way to factor?, T Wake, 19:04
Re: New way to factor?, T Wake, 19:03
Re: New way to factor?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:57
Re: New way to factor?, mmeron, 18:55
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:48
New way to factor?, jstevh, 18:46
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 18:43
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:40
Re: Star Distances, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:33
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 18:33
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:28
Re: gyro power generator, Bernhard Kuemel, 18:27
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:23
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 18:18
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, Salmon Egg, 17:39
Re: Einstein, mind's voyage, speed of light and time, G. L. Bradford, 17:23
Re: Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?, J. Horta, 16:44
Re: gyro power generator, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 16:32
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:30
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:16
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 16:10
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 16:10
Re: the simplest system of units of measure, Externet, 16:06
Re: LHC due for 2007 start, Sue..., 16:04
Re: Einstein, mind's voyage, speed of light and time, Tom Roberts, 15:58
Re: LHC due for 2007 start, Sue..., 15:28
Re: gyro power generator, Bernhard Kuemel, 15:26
Re: gyro power generator, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 15:03
gyro power generator, Bernhard Kuemel, 15:00
Re: LHC due for 2007 start, Sam Wormley, 14:44
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:03
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:59
Re: Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?, Edward Green, 13:29
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:29
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:28
Re: PING FNVW (Re: GAB NOMINATION: Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this...), Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:27
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:24
Re: the simplest system of units of measure, T Wake, 13:19
Re: relatively confusing, tadchem, 13:12
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:12
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:11
PING FNVW (Re: GAB NOMINATION: Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this...), Colonel Jake TM, 13:05
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 12:59
You can catch THEM :-), Math Freak, 12:23
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, tadchem, 12:17
Back From The Future, Jack Sarfatti, 12:17
the simplest system of units of measure, donaldsauter, 12:14
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:11
Re: relatively confusing, Martin Hogbin, 12:09
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:04
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 11:58
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:57
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 11:55
Re: Any alternatives for conventional gasoline?, jimp, 11:55
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:54
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:52
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 11:48
Re: LHC due for 2007 start, Sue..., 11:45
Re: GAB NOMINATION: Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., Colonel Jake TM, 11:37
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, Uncle Al, 11:36
Re: GAB NOMINATION: Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:35
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:33
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 11:26
Re: Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?, Greg Hansen, 11:10
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:53
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Mike, 10:53
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 10:51
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:45
Re: GAB NOMINATION: Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., Art Deco, 10:45
Re: universal forces, T Wake, 10:44
Re: LHC due for 2007 start, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 10:44
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 10:40
Re: GAB NOMINATION: Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., T Wake, 10:38
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:34
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., T Wake, 10:32
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., Brad Guth, 10:20
Re: GAB NOMINATION: Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:10
GAB NOMINATION: Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., Art Deco, 10:08
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:02
Jeff_Relf needs your vote!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:50
Re: Omega is 1., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:35
Re: Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?, Edward Green, 09:34
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, malibu, 09:19
universal forces, JoeT, 08:57
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 08:56
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Edward Green, 08:51
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 08:46
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:45
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Edward Green, 08:45
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 08:42
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:38
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:34
Re: Plank_Surveyor will find no gravity waves., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:33
Re: Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:31
Re: Omega is 1., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:30
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, wate, 08:18
Re: Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, wate, 08:12
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 07:58
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Egap, 07:43
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 07:18
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 07:10
Einstein, mind's voyage, speed of light and time, G. L. Bradford, 06:30
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 06:20
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 05:48
Re: Plank_Surveyor will find no gravity waves., T Wake, 05:41
Re: Any alternatives for conventional gasoline?, habshi, 05:35
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 05:33
I DONT THINK YOU HEAReD ME, dedanoe, 05:28
delphi art, dedanoe, 05:25
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, tdp1001, 05:15
Re: relatively confusing, Martin Hogbin, 05:15
Re: Plank_Surveyor will find no gravity waves., Eric Gisse, 04:45
Re: relatively confusing, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:42
Can atoms/molecules store imformations?, kumar, 04:32
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, tdp1001, 04:29
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, tdp1001, 04:29
Re: Plank_Surveyor will find no gravity waves., T Wake, 04:28
Re: Omega is 1., T Wake, 04:26
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., T Wake, 04:17
Re: Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand..., T Wake, 04:16
Re: Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand..., T Wake, 04:15
Re: Looking for The_Hard_Hookup., T Wake, 04:06
Re: Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand..., Eric Gisse, 04:01
Re: LHC due for 2007 start, Eric Gisse, 04:00
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 03:56
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 03:55
Re: Omega is 1., Eric Gisse, 03:47
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 03:45
Re: Plank_Surveyor will find no gravity waves., Eric Gisse, 03:42
Re: Looking for The_Hard_Hookup., Eric Gisse, 03:36
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 03:19
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 75.1: PI and Space-time Averages of Gravitational/Classical Fields, OsherD, 03:17
Plank_Surveyor will find no gravity waves., Jeff…Relf, 02:52
Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand..., Jeff…Relf, 02:36
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 02:32
Looking for The_Hard_Hookup., Jeff…Relf, 02:21
Omega is 1., Jeff…Relf, 02:08
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 01:58
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Fred J . McCall, 01:58
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 75.1: PI and Space-time Averages of Gravitational/Classical Fields, OsherD, 01:56
Re: LHC due for 2007 start, FrediFizzx, 01:49

June 23, 2006

Counting Franklin's Magic Squares, Sam Wormley, 23:58
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Art Deco, 23:56
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., Eric Gisse, 23:27
Re: needs insight for de Broglie relation, Greg Hansen, 23:19
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., Brad Guth, 23:18
Re: Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?, Greg Hansen, 23:11
LHC due for 2007 start, Sam Wormley, 22:36
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, Eric Gisse, 20:52
Re: mattress keeps inching off of bed, Mohab, 20:44
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 20:27
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, hhc314, 20:17
Re: mattress keeps inching off of bed, Sam Wormley, 20:14
mattress keeps inching off of bed, frank wight, 20:05
Re: Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?, Edward Green, 19:48
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 75: Bianchi and PI in GR 2006, OsherD, 19:42
Re: relatively confusing, Martin Hogbin, 19:23
Re: Aw F_ck it., Eric Gisse, 19:13
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Henri Wilson, 18:44
Re: relatively confusing, T Wake, 18:40
Re: Everything is gibberish to the untutored., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:39
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 18:39
Re: T_Wake, is the word pseudorandom too large for you ?, T Wake, 18:37
Re: Everything is gibberish to the untutored., T Wake, 18:36
Re: Wiki_Pedia, WP, is a Wiki., bullpup, 18:29
Re: When a topic covers things morons think they know., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:25
Re: T_Wake, is the word pseudorandom too large for you ?, Eric Gisse, 17:22
Re: Go ahead and tell us... Gisse., Eric Gisse, 17:17
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 17:17
Re: When a topic covers things morons think they know., Eric Gisse, 17:16
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, FrediFizzx, 16:57
Re: needs insight for de Broglie relation, Materion, 16:26
ADAM RIESS SHARES SHAW PRIZE IN ASTRONOMY FOR 2006, Sam Wormley, 16:25
Re: relatively confusing, Sam Wormley, 16:03
Re: Wiki_Pedia, WP, is a Wiki., bryce . topmind . jacobs, 15:51
Re: relatively confusing, Sue..., 15:49
Re: relatively confusing, Sue..., 15:45
Re: Hitler and the Bomb, jimp, 15:45
Re: NEWTON WAS WRONG, xray4abc, 15:37
Re: relatively confusing, Randy Poe, 15:32
Re: is entropy the Faraday law analog or the Ampere law analog Re:, a_plutonium, 15:29
Re: Wiki_Pedia, WP, is a Wiki., David Iain Greig, 15:27
Re: relatively confusing, oldton, 15:02
is entropy the Faraday law analog or the Ampere law analog Re:, a_plutonium, 14:59
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, Rock Brentwood, 14:58
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rock Brentwood, 14:54
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Golden Boar, 14:11
Re: Everything is gibberish to the untutored., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:10
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:08
Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:07
Re: relatively confusing, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:07
Re: Everything is gibberish to the untutored., T Wake, 14:05
Re: relatively confusing, T Wake, 14:04
Re: Everything is gibberish to the untutored., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:03
Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., T Wake, 14:01
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., T Wake, 14:00
Hitler and the Bomb, mrdarrett, 14:00
Re: Everything is gibberish to the untutored., T Wake, 13:59
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, malibu, 13:43
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 13:34
relatively confusing, oldton, 13:30
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:23
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:23
Re: here or there??, oldton, 13:22
Re: Particle physics book (undergraduate/graduate level)?, FrediFizzx, 13:19
Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:19
Re: Everything is gibberish to the untutored., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:16
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., Brad Guth, 13:05
Re: How can a non-resonant monochromatic light induce an atomic transition?, Andy Resnick, 12:16
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, T Wake, 12:05
Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., T Wake, 12:00
Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., T Wake, 11:59
Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., T Wake, 11:59
Re: Scale_Factor = .07158 Gy * 13.7 Gy = .98 Gy ^ 2, T Wake, 11:57
Re: Why is the scale factor = a ( t ) = ( t / t_0 ) ^ .667 ?, T Wake, 11:56
Re: What does be width of the _Visible_ universe have to do with it's age ?, T Wake, 11:52
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, malibu, 11:49
Re: How can a non-resonant monochromatic light induce an atomic transition?, Tareq, 11:44
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 11:35
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, T Wake, 11:19
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, malibu, 11:09
Re: Everything is gibberish to the untutored., jimp, 11:05
Re: Aw F_ck it., T Wake, 10:56
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., T Wake, 10:54
Re: T_Wake claims to know more about quanta than Einstein., T Wake, 10:50
Re: Everything is gibberish to the untutored., T Wake, 10:47
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Martin Brown, 10:45
Re: Everything is gibberish to the untutored., T Wake, 10:43
Re: It saddens me to no end..., T Wake, 10:39
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, actionintegral, 10:25
Re: How can a non-resonant monochromatic light induce an atomic transition?, Andy Resnick, 09:43
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, tdp1001, 09:38
NEWTON WAS WRONG, ACE, 09:04
Re: Go ahead and tell us... Gisse., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:58
Re: T_Wake claims to know more about quanta than Einstein., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:55
Re: Everything is gibberish to the untutored., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:55
Re: When a topic covers things morons think they know., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:53
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:49
Re: Black body radiation, Andy Resnick, 08:49
Re: It saddens me to no end..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:49
Re: brain physics, J P, 08:48
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:46
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:44
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:42
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:41
Re: Scale_Factor = .07158 Gy * 13.7 Gy = .98 Gy ^ 2, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:39
Re: Black body radiation, PD, 08:32
Particle physics book (undergraduate/graduate level)?, henri . heinonen, 08:31
Re: The age of the universe, PD, 08:30
Re: "The Paradox of Zeno", donstockbauer, 08:10
Re: Conservation of light energy..., Sam Wormley, 08:06
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Sam Wormley, 08:01
Re: The age of the universe, Sam Wormley, 07:58
"The Paradox of Zeno", Egap, 07:57
Re: Conservation of light energy..., Thomas Smid, 07:41
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, CrankHater, 07:34
Black body radiation, kunzmilan, 07:17
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Richard Herring, 07:05
Go ahead and tell us... Gisse., Jeff…Relf, 06:45
Aw F_ck it., Jeff…Relf, 06:42
T_Wake, is the word pseudorandom too large for you ?, Jeff…Relf, 06:37
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, tdp1001, 06:29
T_Wake claims to know more about quanta than Einstein., Jeff…Relf, 06:28
Everything is gibberish to the untutored., Jeff…Relf, 06:21
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 06:17
When a topic covers things morons think they know., Jeff…Relf, 06:12
Re: Scale_Factor = .07158 Gy * 13.7 Gy = .98 Gy ^ 2, Eric Gisse, 06:05
Re: brain physics, Ian Parker, 06:04
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., Eric Gisse, 06:04
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, kunzmilan, 06:03
Re: brain physics, Ian Parker, 06:00
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, tdp1001, 05:56
Re: Wiki_Pedia, WP, is a Wiki., Jeff…Relf, 05:51
T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone., Jeff…Relf, 05:46
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 05:42
It saddens me to no end..., Jeff…Relf, 05:41
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Richard Herring, 05:39
The age of the universe, sir_laurent@xxxxxxxxxx, 05:34
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 05:28
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Richard Herring, 05:01
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Richard Herring, 05:00
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 04:44
Re: Scientific Errors, Utopian, 04:39
Re: Scientific Errors, Utopian, 04:25
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 04:12
Love them thar Bet_The_Farm derivatives !, Jeff…Relf, 04:10
Re: Scientific Errors, Utopian, 04:06
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales., Ken S. Tucker, 03:19
Re: Scientific Errors, Utopian, 03:12
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales., Ken S. Tucker, 03:04
Re: Scientific Errors, Utopian, 03:00
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 02:51
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Utopian, 02:44
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Bilge, 02:41
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 02:40
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, Tom Potter, 02:32
Re: Einstein's contributions to probabilistic systems., Timberwoof, 02:29
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Utopian, 02:26
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Utopian, 02:11
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Ken S. Tucker, 02:06
Re: Can energy impact solids?, Y.Porat, 01:52
Re: Chandra solves black hole mystery, malibu, 01:36
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, Jeff…Relf, 01:18
Re: SFT and Nuclear Physics, tony fleming, 00:51
Scale_Factor = .07158 Gy * 13.7 Gy = .98 Gy ^ 2, Jeff…Relf, 00:50
Re: Can energy impact solids?, PD, 00:12
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 74: The Statistical Classifier Battle Between the Simplifiers and Complicators, OsherD, 00:05
Chandra solves black hole mystery, Sam Wormley, 00:04

June 22, 2006

Re: Taking human culture to universe., Fred J . McCall, 23:50
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Eric Gisse, 23:08
Re: Space Travel consequences, Roy L . Fuchs, 23:07
Re: Price of beer., RadicalLibertarian, 23:04
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Tom Potter, 23:01
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Tom Potter, 22:43
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Tom Potter, 22:37
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 22:20
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 22:17
Re: Price of beer., RadicalLibertarian, 21:39
Re: Price of beer., RadicalLibertarian, 21:20
Re: Price of beer., RadicalLibertarian, 21:06
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Brad Guth, 20:26
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:10
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, Brad Guth, 20:09
Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:05
Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., Jeff…Relf, 20:02
Re: Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:47
Duckie, _Please_ email your professor this..., Jeff…Relf, 19:44
Re: Price of beer., boson boss, 19:33
Re: Why is the scale factor = a ( t ) = ( t / t_0 ) ^ .667 ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:31
Why is the scale factor = a ( t ) = ( t / t_0 ) ^ .667 ?, Jeff…Relf, 19:27
Help with atmospheric water vapor partial pressure experiment., D Akers, 19:00
Re: What does be width of the _Visible_ universe have to do with it's age ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:49
What does be width of the _Visible_ universe have to do with it's age ?, Jeff…Relf, 18:44
Re: needs insight for de Broglie relation, Edward Green, 18:40
Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, boson boss, 18:40
Re: brain physics, Math Freak, 18:39
Re: deceptively simple mechanics problem, krisdawsey, 18:36
Re: On Usenet, what you see it what you get., T Wake, 18:34
Re: On Usenet, what you see it what you get., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:32
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, T Wake, 18:31
Re: On Usenet, what you see it what you get., T Wake, 18:30
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, Edward Green, 18:30
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 18:29
Re: Conservation of light energy..., T Wake, 18:28
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), T Wake, 18:24
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:21
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, T Wake, 18:19
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, T Wake, 18:17
Re: On Usenet, what you see it what you get., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:17
Re: needs insight for de Broglie relation, Materion, 18:16
Re: The width of the visible universe has _Nothing_ to do with it's age., T Wake, 18:15
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), PD, 18:14
On Usenet, what you see it what you get., Jeff…Relf, 18:14
Re: The width of the visible universe has _Nothing_ to do with it's age., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:12
The width of the visible universe has _Nothing_ to do with it's age., Jeff…Relf, 18:10
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:09
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, Eric Gisse, 18:08
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 18:00
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:53
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:49
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, Jeff…Relf, 17:47
Re: deceptively simple mechanics problem, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:43
Re: deceptively simple mechanics problem, mmeron, 17:39
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 17:36
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 17:34
Re: What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:31
What was the width of the visible sound-horizon at the birth of the CMB ?, Jeff…Relf, 17:25
Re: Classical vs. Quantum?, srp, 17:23
Re: How can a non-resonant monochromatic light induce an atomic transition?, srp, 17:16
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi, OsherD, 17:14
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi, OsherD, 17:05
Re: Conservation of light energy..., PD, 17:04
Re: Looking for article, Math Freak, 16:56
Re: Guaranteed fix for the Iraq problem, Math Freak, 16:50
Re: Conservation of light energy..., PD, 16:46
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), PD, 16:37
Classical vs. Quantum?, dweller, 16:34
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, PD, 16:26
Re: deceptively simple mechanics problem, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:19
Re: deceptively simple mechanics problem, mmeron, 16:16
Re: deceptively simple mechanics problem, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:13
Re: deceptively simple mechanics problem, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:12
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 16:11
Re: deceptively simple mechanics problem, arvee, 16:11
Re: Most WikiPedia admins are young and have much to learn., Eric Gisse, 16:06
Re: deceptively simple mechanics problem, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:03
entropy as the 4th law of thermodynamics Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, a_plutonium, 16:00
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, rangeravenger, 15:57
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, dda1, 15:55
Re: deceptively simple mechanics problem, krisdawsey, 15:54
Re: Conservation of light energy..., tomgee, 15:51
Re: Collection of free physics and mathematics video lectures., Hero, 15:49
Re: deceptively simple mechanics problem, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:48
deceptively simple mechanics problem, krisdawsey, 15:44
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:35
Re: Heat flow in simple geometries?, mmeron, 15:31
Re: Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:08
Re: Heat flow in simple geometries?, Faruq Qutaybah, 14:53
Re: Heat flow in simple geometries?, Mark P, 14:53
Re: Looking for article, Faruq Qutaybah, 14:50
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 73: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,w) - f(x,w)] = 1, Faruq, 14:47
Re: Heat flow in simple geometries?, Andy Resnick, 14:43
How can a non-resonant monochromatic light induce an atomic transition?, Tareq, 14:42
Re: Heat flow in simple geometries?, mmeron, 14:29
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi, Spice Malenge, 14:29
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, GSS, 14:28
Re: Einstein's contributions to probabilistic systems., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:21
Re: Einstein's contributions to probabilistic systems., T Wake, 14:18
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:17
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, GSS, 14:15
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:14
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:13
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:12
Heat flow in simple geometries?, Paul Ciszek, 14:11
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., dda1, 14:07
Re: Conservation of light energy..., Sam Wormley, 14:04
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., dda1, 13:54
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, dda1, 13:52
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, T Wake, 13:49
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:46
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, GSS, 13:46
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 13:46
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:42
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:39
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., GSS, 13:39
Collection of free physics and mathematics video lectures., Peteris Krumins, 13:38
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), T Wake, 13:32
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, GSS, 13:29
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:27
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., GSS, 13:25
Re: Most WikiPedia admins are young and have much to learn., T Wake, 13:18
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:16
Re: WikiPedia's admins imagine that psuedorandomness means the outcome is knowable., T Wake, 13:15
Re: Liquid Heat Pipe Design, Orientation & Wicking Material, Spice Malenge, 13:14
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, GSS, 13:14
Re: Pseudorandomness exists even when _No_One_ knows the exact outcome., T Wake, 13:09
Re: Einstein's contributions to probabilistic systems., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:07
Re: Einstein's contributions to probabilistic systems., T Wake, 13:04
Re: GRAVITATION, Greg Neill, 12:52
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 12:37
Re: needs insight for de Broglie relation, Igor, 12:24
Re: Two up quarks and one down quark., Igor, 12:13
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:00
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Richard Herring, 11:56
Re: Metric Dictionary?, J. J. Lodder, 11:47
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, malibu, 11:45
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, CrankHater, 11:40
Re: Most WikiPedia admins are young and have much to learn., Randy Poe, 11:39
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, malibu, 11:33
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Tom Potter, 11:22
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, CrankHater, 11:15
Liquid Heat Pipe Design, Orientation & Wicking Material, wwswimming, 11:00
Re: God likes curses, CrankHater, 11:00
Re: Conservation of light energy..., Thomas Smid, 10:47
Re: Can energy impact solids?, Randy Poe, 10:45
Re: Can energy impact solids?, PD, 10:33
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:30
Re: needs insight for de Broglie relation, nk., 10:28
Re: needs insight for de Broglie relation, malibu, 10:23
Re: Wiki_Pedia, WP, is a Wiki., Cyde Weys, 10:13
Re: Metric Dictionary?, Troels Forchhammer, 10:12
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Randy Poe, 10:12
Re: brain physics, J P, 10:05
needs insight for de Broglie relation, ipensive, 10:05
Re: brain physics, J P, 10:03
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, actionintegral, 10:02
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Golden Boar, 09:57
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Golden Boar, 09:57
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Richard Herring, 09:55
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, dda1, 09:19
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:18
Guaranteed fix for the Iraq problem, Tom Potter, 09:15
Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, Aleksandr Timofeev, 09:15
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:14
Re: Wiki_Pedia, WP, is a Wiki., David Iain Greig, 09:10
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:10
Re: Einstein was a master of probabilistic systems., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:10
Re: Most WikiPedia admins are young and have much to learn., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:09
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Tom Potter, 09:08
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:07
Re: Einstein's contributions to probabilistic systems., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:05
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Tom Potter, 09:03
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:02
Re: Classical Dynamics, the point of suspension of a simple pendulum., nk., 08:56
Re: Metric Dictionary?, JF, 08:40
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, GSS, 07:52
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 07:37
Re: brain physics, uri, 07:35
A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Egap, 07:32
Re: brain physics, Jan Panteltje, 07:24
Re: here or there contd...(simultaineity for the third time!!!), Bob Cain, 07:12
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, jmfbahciv, 07:10
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Jan Panteltje, 07:04
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, jmfbahciv, 07:03
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Richard Herring, 06:55
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Richard Herring, 06:48
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, jmfbahciv, 06:48
Re: Why sending a signal, or travel, back in time can't be done, damnfine, 06:26
Why sending a signal, or travel, back in time can't be done, G. L. Bradford, 06:08
Re: brain physics, Ian Parker, 06:06
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Tom Potter, 05:52
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Tom Potter, 05:43
Re: Space Travel consequences, G. L. Bradford, 05:11
Wiki_Pedia, WP, is a Wiki., Jeff…Relf, 05:00
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Richard Herring, 04:56
Einstein was a master of probabilistic systems., Jeff…Relf, 04:53
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 04:47
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Richard Herring, 04:45
The word irregardless ain't no bad., Jeff…Relf, 04:44
Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, a_plutonium, 04:42
Most WikiPedia admins are young and have much to learn., Jeff…Relf, 04:42
Re: Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?, irfan, 04:39
The word irregardless isn't no bad., Jeff…Relf, 04:35
Looking for article, info, 04:25
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 04:13
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 73: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,w) - f(x,w)] = 1, OsherD, 03:51
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 73: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,w) - f(x,w)] = 1, OsherD, 03:26
Einstein's contributions to probabilistic systems., Jeff…Relf, 03:07
Re: Fairly simple question concerning the Kwh unit, CWatters, 03:05
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Timo A. Nieminen, 03:02
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi, OsherD, 03:00
Re: here or there??, The Ghost In The Machine, 03:00
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 02:51
Re: brain physics, uri, 01:56
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 01:42
Re: Two up quarks and one down quark., malibu, 01:40
Re: WikiPedia's admins imagine that psuedorandomness means the outcome is knowable., Timberwoof, 01:36
Re: Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?, J. Horta, 01:00
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 00:54
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 00:29
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 00:28

June 21, 2006

Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 23:51
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 23:32
Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, Tom Ring, 22:40
Re: Fairly simple question concerning the Kwh unit, Spice Malenge, 22:32
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, tdp1001, 22:19
WikiPedia's admins imagine that psuedorandomness means the outcome is knowable., Jeff…Relf, 22:05
Re: Pseudorandomness exists even when _No_One_ knows the exact outcome., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:50
Pseudorandomness exists even when _No_One_ knows the exact outcome., Jeff…Relf, 21:48
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:42
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 21:28
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 21:25
Re: brain physics, J P, 21:23
Re: brain physics, darwinist, 21:23
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 21:20
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, jimp, 21:05
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, FrediFizzx, 20:52
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, Edward Green, 20:45
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 20:39
Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?, Edward Green, 20:20
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, jimp, 20:15
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:08
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Edward Green, 20:06
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, PD, 20:05
Re: Scientific Errors, PD, 19:59
Re: Scientific Errors, PD, 19:55
Re: Fairly simple question concerning the Kwh unit, mmeron, 19:49
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Edward Green, 19:48
Fairly simple question concerning the Kwh unit, xyzer, 19:46
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 19:39
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, Edward Green, 19:10
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, Edward Green, 19:02
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Henri Wilson, 18:36
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 18:27
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:24
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 18:22
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:17
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 18:14
Re: Scientific Errors, Thomas Smid, 18:10
Re: Scientific Errors, jimp, 18:05
Re: Scientific Errors, Timo A. Nieminen, 18:03
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:02
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 18:01
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:51
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 17:49
Re: Scientific Errors, Thomas Smid, 17:48
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:40
Re: Eintein endlessly asserted that dice/nature are/is pseudorandom., Eric Gisse, 17:39
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 17:37
? complex elec permittivity, Cheng Cosine, 17:36
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 17:24
Re: Scientific Errors, jimp, 17:05
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:54
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 16:48
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 16:41
Re: brain physics, Ian Parker, 16:33
diFFerential-equations with symmetry that gives two invariants!, NILS B�RJESSON, 16:14
Re: brain physics, John Jones, 16:01
Re: Scientific Errors, jimp, 15:25
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Ken S. Tucker, 15:18
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Ken Muldrew, 15:14
Re: curses, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:08
Re: curses, T Wake, 15:04
Re: A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, Don, 14:54
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, actionintegral, 14:45
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sorcerer, 14:41
Re: curses, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:39
Re: curses, T Wake, 14:37
Need a precise ammeter?, Glenn Møller-Holst, 14:37
Re: curses, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:17
Re: curses, T Wake, 14:09
Re: A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, Don, 14:09
Re: Two up quarks and one down quark., Igor, 14:04
Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, a_plutonium, 14:01
Re: Price of beer., Igor, 14:00
Re: WikiPedia admins are making Jeff_Relf look an_idiot, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:54
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, T Wake, 13:52
Re: WikiPedia admins are making Jeff_Relf look an_idiot, T Wake, 13:50
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:49
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:49
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, dda1, 13:45
Re: WikiPedia admins are making Einstein look like a born-again Christian., Bill Hudson, 13:43
Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:30
Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, a_plutonium, 13:29
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:28
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, FrediFizzx, 13:27
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:27
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:26
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:25
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:21
Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:21
Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, a_plutonium, 13:20
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 13:17
Re: WikiPedia admins are making Jeff_Relf look an_idiot, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:16
Re: WikiPedia admins are making Jeff_Relf look an_idiot, T Wake, 13:12
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales. (was This Week's, Gene Ward Smith, 13:05
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:03
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, PD, 12:53
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi, Spice Malenge, 12:36
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi, Spice Malenge, 12:33
Re: Asshole of the month boilerplate, Richard Herring, 12:32
Re: Scientific Errors, PD, 12:23
Re: curses, Richard Tobin, 12:11
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Y.Porat, 12:07
here or there contd...(simultaineity for the third time!!!), oldton, 12:06
Re: curses, Richard Herring, 11:56
Re: curses, Richard Herring, 11:51
Re: Can energy impact solids?, PD, 11:46
Re: Can energy impact solids?, meghali, 11:43
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, PD, 11:41
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 11:37
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 11:35
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, PD, 11:33
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, malibu, 10:48
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 10:44
Re: curses, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:44
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 10:43
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 10:42
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:36
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, John C . Polasek, 10:28
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, PD, 10:28
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, dda1, 10:27
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, actionintegral, 10:22
Re: Conservation of light energy..., Y.Porat, 10:22
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:13
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 10:04
Classical Dynamics, the point of suspension of a simple pendulum., 48970308, 10:02
Re: GRAVITATION, kirov, 10:01
Re: curses, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:00
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:59
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 09:39
"The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", Egap, 09:36
OT: Pluto's Twins Get Their Names (Nix and Hydra), Sam Wormley, 09:32
Re: Conservation of light energy..., Andy Resnick, 08:59
Asshole of the month boilerplate, Tom Potter, 08:59
Re: Price of beer., RadicalLibertarian, 08:58
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:51
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Tom Potter, 08:46
Re: Can energy impact solids?, PD, 08:40
Re: WikiPedia admins are making Jeff_Relf look an_idiot, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:29
Re: Newton is a shithead, donstockbauer, 08:08
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:02
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:00
Re: WikiPedia admins are making Einstein look like a born-again Christian., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:58
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, actionintegral, 07:29
Re: Scientific Errors, jmfbahciv, 06:54
Re: curses, jmfbahciv, 06:48
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 06:46
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 06:45
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, jmfbahciv, 06:39
Re: brain physics, Ian Parker, 06:37
Newton is a shithead, dedanoe, 06:37
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sorcerer, 06:36
how do stars get born?, dedanoe, 06:30
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 06:15
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sorcerer, 06:09
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sue..., 05:40
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, tadchem, 05:37
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Jan Panteltje, 05:30
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Jan Panteltje, 05:26
WikiPedia admins are making Einstein look like a born-again Christian., Jeff…Relf, 05:21
Re: Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, a_plutonium, 05:11
Re: Nomination for the "Loudmouth Asshole of the month" Award., Richard Herring, 05:03
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 04:53
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, T Wake, 04:50
Re: Eintein endlessly asserted that dice/nature are/is pseudorandom., T Wake, 04:49
Re: FireFox's userContent.CSS and WikiPedia's diff., T Wake, 04:48
Re: brain physics, uri, 04:47
Re: I've got too many things on my plate right now., T Wake, 04:47
Eintein endlessly asserted that dice/nature are/is pseudorandom., Jeff…Relf, 04:43
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, T Wake, 04:34
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Y.Porat, 04:24
FireFox's userContent.CSS and WikiPedia's diff., Jeff…Relf, 04:21
I've got too many things on my plate right now., Jeff…Relf, 04:01
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 04:00
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 72: Bianchi Identity Type Creates A New Kind of "Imaginary" Number, OsherD, 03:32
Can thermodynamics be a subset of the Maxwell Equations, a_plutonium, 02:37
Re: Scientific Errors, Jim Black, 02:13
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, dda1, 01:41
Price of beer., RadicalLibertarian, 01:39
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Y.Porat, 01:20
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 01:02
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, FrediFizzx, 00:37
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 00:26
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Bilge, 00:22

June 20, 2006

Re: Conservation of light energy..., mmeron, 23:50
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 23:47
Re: Conservation of light energy..., Sam Wormley, 23:33
Single-electron counter breaks new record, Sam Wormley, 23:27
Re: Truth or Hoax?, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:53
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi, OsherD, 22:52
Re: Truth or Hoax?, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:39
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi, OsherD, 22:39
Re: takes 1.5 gallons gasoline to produce 1 gallon ethanol in modern agriculture, jimp, 22:35
Re: Conservation of light energy..., jimp, 22:15
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, jimp, 22:15
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, jimp, 22:15
Re: takes 1.5 gallons gasoline to produce 1 gallon ethanol in modern agriculture, Externet, 22:13
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, dda1, 22:03
Conservation of light energy..., Externet, 22:01
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi, donstockbauer, 22:00
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, GSS, 21:51
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, GSS, 21:41
Re: Two up quarks and one down quark., noshellswill, 21:02
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Art Deco, 20:21
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Tom Potter, 19:57
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Tom Potter, 19:56
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, jimp, 19:55
Re: Two up quarks and one down quark., , 19:40
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi, Spice Malenge, 19:28
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Edward Green, 19:22
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi, OsherD, 19:19
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds, Edward Green, 19:16
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Edward Green, 19:08
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Henri Wilson, 18:39
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Henri Wilson, 18:36
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Richard Saam, 18:26
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, PD, 17:54
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sorcerer, 17:38
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 17:36
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 17:35
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 17:21
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales, David W . Cantrell, 17:01
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales, David W . Cantrell, 16:45
Gore Slams Global Warming Critics, tadchem, 16:38
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales, Randy Poe, 16:13
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales, Gene Ward Smith, 16:12
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, actionintegral, 16:10
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales, David W . Cantrell, 15:48
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Jan Panteltje, 15:16
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Igor, 15:14
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Jan Panteltje, 15:07
Re: Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone, T Wake, 15:02
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 15:00
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 14:54
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 14:46
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, PD, 14:24
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, PD, 14:22
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, PD, 14:19
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, John C . Polasek, 14:19
Re: Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:13
Re: Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., T Wake, 14:03
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:46
Re: Scientific Errors, Thomas Smid, 13:44
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, PD, 13:43
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., dda1, 13:42
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, PD, 13:37
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Uncle Clover, 13:34
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 13:16
Re: Scientific Errors, Thomas Smid, 13:08
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sorcerer, 13:08
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:06
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:00
Re: Scientific Errors, Thomas Smid, 12:57
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:56
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., GSS, 12:54
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Y.Porat, 12:50
Re: Truth or Hoax?, John Meglier, 12:11
Re: brain physics, Ian Parker, 12:09
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Sam Wormley, 12:00
Re: Two up quarks and one down quark., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:56
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:55
Re: Two up quarks and one down quark., malibu, 11:55
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, malibu, 11:52
Re: Two up quarks and one down quark., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:47
Re: Two up quarks and one down quark., malibu, 11:45
Re: Two up quarks and one down quark., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:37
Re: Two up quarks and one down quark., malibu, 11:36
Re: Two up quarks and one down quark., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:22
Two up quarks and one down quark., malibu, 11:20
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:18
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 11:13
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, malibu, 11:13
Re: curses, Richard Herring, 11:01
Re: here or there??, oldton, 10:58
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 10:48
Re: here or there??, oldton, 10:43
Re: curses, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:30
Re: here or there??, Sam Wormley, 10:29
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:24
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:23
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:22
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Tom Potter, 10:20
"Corrections to Special Relativity", Egap, 10:15
"Corrections to Special Relativity", Egap, 10:14
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Vert, 10:07
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, John C . Polasek, 10:06
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, dda1, 09:51
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:51
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, malibu, 09:41
Re: brain physics, uri, 09:31
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Tom Potter, 09:12
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, kunzmilan, 08:55
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:45
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:44
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, GSS, 08:43
Re: brain physics, Jan Panteltje, 08:31
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 08:29
Re: Can energy impact solids?, PD, 07:52
Re: brain physics, Weschler187, 07:15
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 07:14
brain physics, uri, 06:56
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Jan Panteltje, 06:25
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Jan Panteltje, 06:23
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Jan Panteltje, 06:20
Re: Gravity - Caused by GR curvature or gravitons?, tomgee, 06:01
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 05:39
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 05:24
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Max Keon, 05:06
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 05:02
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 04:52
Re: Scientific Errors, jmfbahciv, 04:49
Re: Truth or Hoax?, CWatters, 04:15
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, CWatters, 04:11
Re: here or there??, CWatters, 03:53
Re: here or there??, CWatters, 03:49
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 03:25
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 02:51
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sorcerer, 02:36
Re: Truth or Hoax?, Roy L . Fuchs, 02:24
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Ken S. Tucker, 02:17
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 01:20
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, mmeron, 01:09
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Tom Roberts, 01:05
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, FrediFizzx, 00:45
Re: God is pure, James "Kibo" Parry, 00:41
Re: Gravity - Caused by GR curvature or gravitons?, Sam Wormley, 00:15
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 19 June 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 00:11
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 00:05

June 19, 2006

Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 23:49
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 23:40
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 23:39
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Y.Porat, 23:26
Re: Truth or Hoax?, rangeravenger, 23:17
Re: Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., Walter Bushell, 23:15
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Tom Potter, 23:12
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Tom Potter, 23:12
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Bill Hobba, 23:05
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Edward Green, 22:58
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Bill Hobba, 22:57
Re: Space Travel consequences, John Meglier, 22:54
Re: Truth or Hoax?, John Meglier, 22:52
Re: --off topic --Is Ann Coulter a Terrorist?, hhc314, 22:41
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:39
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 22:36
Re: Space Travel consequences, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:34
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:29
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:28
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 22:26
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Vert, 22:20
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 22:14
Re: Truth or Hoax?, Roy L . Fuchs, 22:13
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, srp, 22:12
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 781 June 19, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 22:07
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 781 June 19, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, tomgee, 21:51
Paper: Bug juice - harvesting electricity with microorganisms, Robert Karl Stonjek, 21:36
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:31
? find wave field using fft, Cheng Cosine, 21:17
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Bilge, 21:12
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Sam Wormley, 21:04
Re: Scientific Errors, Jim Black, 20:59
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Bilge, 20:57
Re: Truth or Hoax?, rangeravenger, 20:56
Re: Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., John Wilkins, 20:55
Re: Truth or Hoax?, rangeravenger, 20:54
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 20:50
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Henri Wilson, 20:49
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Jim Black, 20:47
Re: Truth or Hoax?, John Meglier, 20:36
Space Travel consequences, zach, 20:34
Re: Newton?, Sam Wormley, 20:24
Truth or Hoax?, rangeravenger, 19:30
Re: here or there??, Martin Hogbin, 18:59
Re: here or there??, tadchem, 18:32
Re: Newton?, Paul Cardinale, 18:32
Re: Newton?, tadchem, 18:30
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 781 June 19, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, malibu, 18:21
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Sorcerer, 17:41
Re: here or there??, Sorcerer, 17:40
Re: here or there??, Sorcerer, 17:40
Re: Newton?, Sorcerer, 17:40
Re: Newton?, Sorcerer, 17:29
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales, Gene Ward Smith, 17:26
Re: Scientific Errors, mmeron, 17:00
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 16:51
Re: here or there??, Sam Wormley, 16:13
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:10
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 16:09
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:04
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 16:01
Re: here or there??, T Wake, 16:00
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Sorcerer, 15:55
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Hayek, 15:52
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Richard Saam, 15:45
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 781 June 19, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 15:43
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 15:40
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 15:33
Re: here or there??, oldton, 15:27
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 15:25
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 15:25
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Sorcerer, 15:03
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:44
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, PD, 14:31
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:29
Re: WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, Ali Barker, 14:20
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Ken S. Tucker, 14:10
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sorcerer, 14:09
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 14:02
Re: Can energy impact solids?, PD, 13:59
Re: Modeling nature herself, God., T Wake, 13:56
Re: Modeling nature herself, God., Eric Gisse, 13:53
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, kenseto, 13:52
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 13:49
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, T Wake, 13:47
Re: here or there??, T Wake, 13:47
Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", T Wake, 13:43
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Igor, 13:40
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sorcerer, 13:34
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), T Wake, 13:31
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:28
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:26
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 13:25
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Craig Markwardt, 13:12
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, kenseto, 13:05
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, srp, 12:51
Re: w is dark energy's ( negative ) pressure over density., don, 12:43
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, srp, 12:32
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Sue..., 12:08
Re: Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., Bill Hudson, 11:56
Re: Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., Matt Silberstein, 11:52
Re: Newton?, wg, 11:50
Re: Newton?, Randy Poe, 11:48
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Ken S. Tucker, 11:44
Newton?, sensible, 11:39
Re: Scientific Errors, Thomas Smid, 11:33
Re: Scientific Errors, CWatters, 11:00
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:52
Re: Scientific Errors, Thomas Smid, 10:48
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:45
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, GSS, 10:42
Re: here or there??, CWatters, 10:29
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, John C . Polasek, 10:28
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, actionintegral, 10:26
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:24
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, dda1, 10:22
Re: Scientific Errors, Thomas Smid, 10:22
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, John C . Polasek, 10:14
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, kenseto, 10:11
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 10:08
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 10:03
Re: Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., David Iain Greig, 09:56
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, kenseto, 09:47
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:38
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 09:36
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, kenseto, 09:35
Re: here or there??, Henning Makholm, 09:23
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 09:22
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 09:11
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:10
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, Glenn Møller-Holst, 09:09
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., GSS, 08:48
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), T Wake, 08:46
Re: Modeling nature herself, God., T Wake, 08:41
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, wate, 08:16
Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:06
"Retic Postings and SPAM", Egap, 08:04
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:59
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, malibu, 07:48
Re: Can the anthropic principle be scientific?, donstockbauer, 07:27
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Joe Jakarta, 07:15
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Joe Jakarta, 07:13
Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle, Dennis B, 07:11
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Joe Jakarta, 07:08
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:34
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:23
here or there??, oldton, 06:13
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 05:49
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 19, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:39
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, tadchem, 05:35
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Jan Panteltje, 05:12
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Y.Porat, 05:00
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, Ilja Schmelzer, 04:54
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 04:47
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 04:07
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?, Jack, 03:44
How quantum a sub-particle is?, Jack, 03:39
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Koobee Wublee, 03:12
Re: Scientific Errors, The Ghost In The Machine, 03:00
Re: Folding Perfect Thirds, The Ghost In The Machine, 03:00
Google's Message_Centric Sub_Threads., Jeff…Relf, 02:29
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 02:20
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 02:08
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 02:06
Modeling nature herself, God., Jeff…Relf, 01:43
Re: Scientific Errors, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:58
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, FrediFizzx, 00:26

June 18, 2006

Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Eric Gisse, 23:50
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 23:46
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Tom Potter, 23:44
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Y.Porat, 23:21
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, srp, 23:15
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 23:03
Re: Peking man is considered by many experts to be the, Edward Green, 22:44
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 22:12
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Sorcerer, 21:54
Can the anthropic principle be scientific?, Robert, 21:18
Six Carbon atoms sharing twelve electrons., malibu, 20:25
Re: Newsreaders that can't construct threads., Victor Eijkhout, 20:13
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Henry Haapalainen, 20:13
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Sorcerer, 19:42
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, srp, 19:37
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Roy L . Fuchs, 19:29
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 19:14
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, ma1ibu, 19:10
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., dda1, 18:55
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, dda1, 18:53
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Brad Guth, 18:53
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, ma1ibu, 18:53
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, FrediFizzx, 18:51
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Edward Green, 18:15
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 18:14
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Edward Green, 18:11
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, FrediFizzx, 18:10
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Ken S. Tucker, 17:56
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), T Wake, 17:53
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), T Wake, 17:45
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Edward Green, 17:38
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, srp, 17:29
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Jim Black, 17:05
Re: The inability to see the enire thread is a _Bug_., Eric Gisse, 17:00
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, FrediFizzx, 16:55
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, FrediFizzx, 16:27
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, srp, 16:19
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Eric Gisse, 16:14
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 234), Gene Ward Smith, 16:13
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 70: Logistic vs Lotka-Volterra vs Competition, OsherD, 16:09
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 234), Lee Rudolph, 16:08
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Eric Gisse, 16:06
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, mmeron, 16:05
Re: Scientific Errors, Jim Black, 15:48
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, John C . Polasek, 15:40
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Roy L . Fuchs, 15:30
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Roy L . Fuchs, 15:29
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Roy L . Fuchs, 15:27
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, FrediFizzx, 15:09
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 14:59
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 14:47
Re: Clean room--definition?, Timo A. Nieminen, 14:44
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales, Gene Ward Smith, 14:41
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 14:38
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 234), Gene Ward Smith, 14:35
Re: WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, Dave, 14:34
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 234), Gene Ward Smith, 14:30
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 14:29
Re: Scientific Errors, T Wake, 14:25
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Sorcerer, 14:18
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Sorcerer, 14:18
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), T Wake, 14:16
Re: I'm benching 2.5/.35 Mbps, i.e. 2.5 Mega bits per second down, .35 Mbps up., T Wake, 14:13
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Ken S. Tucker, 14:09
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sorcerer, 14:08
Re: WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, Derek ^, 14:03
Re: The inability to see the enire thread is a _Bug_., T Wake, 13:52
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:39
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., GSS, 13:37
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:25
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, GSS, 13:13
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 13:01
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 12:26
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 12:23
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 12:23
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 12:20
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Mike, 12:01
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Edward Green, 11:23
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:12
Re: New PHYSICS from a free thinker! Was: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:09
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, Tom Roberts, 11:06
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Tom Potter, 11:01
New PHYSICS from a free thinker! Was: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:01
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, Sue..., 10:59
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Tom Roberts, 10:58
Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", donstockbauer, 10:57
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, dda1, 10:54
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:50
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:47
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:44
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:44
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:44
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:44
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, dda1, 10:42
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:42
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, Sue..., 10:32
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:32
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:29
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, Sue..., 10:21
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 10:03
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Yad, 09:46
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 09:39
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Brad Guth, 09:28
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, tadchem, 09:22
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 09:13
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, tadchem, 09:11
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, GSS, 09:00
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:56
Re: GRAVITATION, srp, 08:40
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, GSS, 08:36
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:32
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 08:24
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:13
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Yslsl, 08:08
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, FrediFizzx, 08:06
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 08:02
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:01
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sue..., 07:50
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:31
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Bilge, 06:25
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Richard Schultz, 06:11
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Jan Panteltje, 05:56
Re: Scientific Errors, Jim Black, 05:43
Re: Folding Perfect Thirds, Helmut Wabnig, 05:18
Re: Scientific Errors, Sorcerer, 04:49
Re: Scientific Errors, Sorcerer, 04:39
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sorcerer, 04:27
Re: Folding Perfect Thirds, oldton, 04:14
Re: Folding Perfect Thirds, oldton, 04:09
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Sorcerer, 04:06
Re: Folding Perfect Thirds, oldton, 04:06
Re: Folding Perfect Thirds, oldton, 04:00
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Jim Black, 03:50
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 69: Lotka-Volterra Equations, OsherD, 03:08
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 03:00
GRAVITATION, киров, 02:56
GRAVITATION, киров, 02:55
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Y.Porat, 02:47
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Ken S. Tucker, 02:10
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, The Ghost In The Machine, 02:00
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 01:25
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), T Wake, 01:03
Re: I should submit a bug report to Google., T Wake, 01:01
The inability to see the enire thread is a _Bug_., Jeff…Relf, 00:52
Re: I should submit a bug report to Google., Eric Gisse, 00:44
Re: Newsreaders that can't construct threads., Marc, 00:38
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, FrediFizzx, 00:30
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, mmeron, 00:26
Re: Repulsion binds atoms, Edward Green, 00:20
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00

June 17, 2006

Re: I should submit a bug report to Google., Edward Green, 23:56
Re: I should submit a bug report to Google., Edward Green, 23:52
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, dda1, 23:49
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Tom Roberts, 23:49
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, GSS, 23:47
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 23:41
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Tom Roberts, 23:37
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Y.Porat, 23:37
I should submit a bug report to Google., Jeff…Relf, 23:36
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, tadchem, 23:34
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 23:27
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Tom Potter, 23:14
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
Re: Not exactly rocket science but..., The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 22:59
Re: Scientific Errors, Sorcerer, 22:11
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Sorcerer, 22:10
Re: Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., wade, 21:57
Re: Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., John Wilkins, 20:58
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Henri Wilson, 20:46
Re: Scientific Errors (Proof), Dennis B, 20:35
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 20:18
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, Art Deco, 20:09
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, tadchem, 19:50
Re: Scientific Errors, Eric Gisse, 19:48
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Eric Gisse, 19:37
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, tadchem, 19:31
Re: Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 19:04
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, ma1ibu, 18:56
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, tadchem, 18:39
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, mmeron, 17:53
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Bilge, 17:37
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Edward Green, 17:37
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Bilge, 17:09
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Bilge, 16:57
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sue..., 16:47
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Bilge, 16:46
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, FrediFizzx, 16:42
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, arvee, 16:11
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, srp, 16:01
Re: Scientific Errors, Sorcerer, 15:19
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Sorcerer, 14:59
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 67: dy/dt = 1 + y - x for x = t, OsherD, 14:51
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:50
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Y.Porat, 14:48
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, mmeron, 14:31
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 67: dy/dt = 1 + y - x for x = t, OsherD, 14:26
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales, Ken S. Tucker, 14:17
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 68: dy/dt = y(1 - x), dx/dt = x(1 - y), OsherD, 14:17
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:01
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., dda1, 13:59
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales, Lee Rudolph, 13:49
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, FrediFizzx, 13:46
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, dda1, 13:43
Re: Nature works, Ken S. Tucker, 13:43
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., dda1, 13:41
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 13:36
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., GSS, 13:34
Re: Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., Tom McDonald, 13:20
Re: Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., Matt Silberstein, 13:15
Re: Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., Matt Silberstein, 13:11
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, GSS, 13:09
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:50
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:43
Re: Quantum physics: On Coupling of Mutually Repulsive Atoms, Immortalist, 12:42
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, Brad Guth, 12:37
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, John C . Polasek, 12:33
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Sue..., 12:19
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, John C . Polasek, 12:15
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., GSS, 12:11
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Brad Guth, 12:10
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, FrediFizzx, 12:10
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., dda1, 12:04
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, srp, 11:48
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Sue..., 11:38
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Edward Green, 11:31
Re: Test, Greg Neill, 11:30
Re: Scientific Errors, Greg Neill, 11:27
Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon", Glenn Møller-Holst, 11:23
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., GSS, 11:10
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, GSS, 11:03
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 10:53
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 67: dy/dt = 1 + y - x for x = t, John Meglier, 10:51
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 10:50
Re: Testing a Universal Symmetry, Uncle Al, 10:48
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Edward Green, 10:42
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:42
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 10:39
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., GSS, 10:35
Re: God is pure, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:33
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:22
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 10:18
"A Snapshot of a Photon", Yad, 09:35
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, srp, 09:21
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, srp, 09:06
Re: w is dark energy's ( negative ) pressure over density., Marc, 08:31
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:21
Re: (mechanical) Gravity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:18
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:17
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:08
(mechanical) Gravity, JoeT, 08:07
Re: Scientific Errors, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:05
Re: Scientific Errors, Thomas Smid, 08:04
Re: Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., John Wilkins, 08:02
Re: w is dark energy's ( negative ) pressure over density., John Wilkins, 08:01
Talk.Origins is a bot-moderated group on a slow server., Jeff…Relf, 07:31
Re: Did Variable-Light-Speed Cosmology Originate With Hawking's Idea?, Joe Jakarta, 07:29
Is it 91 billion light-years to the birth of the CBM ?, Jeff…Relf, 07:23
Re: Clean room--definition?, jmfbahciv, 07:22
Re: w is dark energy's ( negative ) pressure over density., Iain, 07:10
Re: w is dark energy's ( negative ) pressure over density., Iain, 07:10
Re: Clean room--definition?, jmfbahciv, 06:59
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Joe Jakarta, 06:57
Scientific Errors (Revision), Dennis B, 06:54
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Sue..., 06:26
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Sorcerer, 05:57
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Sorcerer, 05:57
Re: This thread is _Huge_, it should look like this..., neverbetter, 05:30
Re: Clean room--definition?, jmfbahciv, 05:12
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, T Wake, 04:50
Scientific Errors, Dennis B, 04:42
Re: Who says the CMB could not have been produced via w = -1 ?, T Wake, 04:24
Re: The length, CMB redshift, temperature change and age of the universe., T Wake, 04:23
Re: Newsreaders that can't construct threads., T Wake, 04:21
Re: Can energy impact solids?, mrdarrett, 04:18
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, Bob Cain, 04:01
Chemists have fashioned tiny dots of carbon that glow in response to light, Sam Wormley, 03:53
Folding Perfect Thirds, Sam Wormley, 03:41
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 67: dy/dt = 1 + y - x for x = t, OsherD, 03:05
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 67: dy/dt = 1 + y - x for x = t, OsherD, 02:54
Re: Whwho is a bigger cretin: Y.Porat or Mukesh Prasad ? Brian D. Jones or Pntcho Valev?, Y.Porat, 02:20
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Bill Hobba, 02:09
A question to Paul Draper (PD), Y.Porat, 01:52
Re: Whwho is a bigger cretin: Y.Porat or Mukesh Prasad ? Brian D. Jones or Pntcho Valev?, dda1, 01:50
Re: Whwho is a bigger cretin: Y.Porat or Mukesh Prasad ? Brian D. Jones or Pntcho Valev?, dda1, 01:48
Re: Whwho is a bigger cretin: Y.Porat or Mukesh Prasad ? Brian D. Jones or Pntcho Valev?, Y.Porat, 01:41
Re: w is dark energy's ( negative ) pressure over density., John Wilkins, 01:00

June 16, 2006

Re: Taking human culture to universe., Fred J . McCall, 23:51
Newsreaders that can't construct threads., Jeff…Relf, 23:47
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Fred J . McCall, 23:44
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 23:44
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 23:40
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:29
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 23:20
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, Brad Guth, 22:57
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:08
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, Art Deco, 22:05
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:38
Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, Brad Guth, 21:33
Re: Spitzer Finds Distant Clusters of Galaxies, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:29
Re: Spitzer Finds Distant Clusters of Galaxies, Sam Wormley, 21:27
Testing a Universal Symmetry, Sam Wormley, 21:22
Re: Spitzer Finds Distant Clusters of Galaxies, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:22
Spitzer Finds Distant Clusters of Galaxies, Sam Wormley, 21:17
Re: Not exactly rocket science but..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:02
Irritating and irrelevant spammer plays silly buggers on an inappropriate ng. Was:Re: The length, CMB redshift, temperature change and age of the universe., Tom McDonald, 21:01
Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:59
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension., Brad Guth, 20:54
Not exactly rocket science but..., jt64, 20:49
The length, CMB redshift, temperature change and age of the universe., Jeff…Relf, 20:21
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, Gary Sokolich, 19:42
Re: My letter to the newYork Times about: ''A Ring Tone Meant to Fall on Deaf Ears'', Edward Green, 19:33
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Sue..., 19:30
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, actionintegral, 18:51
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Timo A. Nieminen, 18:38
Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Brad Guth, 18:24
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Timo A. Nieminen, 18:13
Re: Clean room--definition?, PD, 18:12
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 18:06
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Sorcerer, 17:58
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 16 Jun 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 17:55
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, tadchem, 17:52
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Randy Poe, 17:49
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:39
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sorcerer, 17:31
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sorcerer, 17:31
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Sorcerer, 17:31
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, PD, 17:25
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Sorcerer, 17:25
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:22
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Sorcerer, 17:21
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, Sue..., 17:19
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:18
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Randy Poe, 17:17
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Timo A. Nieminen, 17:10
Re: Who says the CMB could not have been produced via w = -1 ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:08
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, actionintegral, 17:05
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Sue..., 17:04
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, FrediFizzx, 17:03
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:59
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Eric Gisse, 16:55
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Sue..., 16:44
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Tom Roberts, 16:42
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Tom Roberts, 16:36
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 16:35
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Jan Panteltje, 16:30
spinning coin animation for C6H12, ma1ibu, 16:27
Re: Clean room--definition?, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:19
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 66: Cross-Logistic Modified/Generalized Equations Continued, OsherD, 16:04
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., FrediFizzx, 16:04
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 66: Cross-Logistic Modified/Generalized Equations Continued, OsherD, 15:55
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, uri, 15:45
Another Rave Review -- Re: EVOLUTION GOES BELLY UP ON LARRY KING LIVE -- That SOB of an Ed Conrad, edconrad, 15:42
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, dda1, 15:35
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Kaniishka, 15:32
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 63: If Subtraction is More Fundamental Than Integration vs Differentiation, Then What Happens to Functional Analysis?, OsherD, 15:32
Re: w is dark energy's ( negative ) pressure over density., Kermit, 15:31
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, dda1, 15:24
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, dda1, 15:22
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Richard Saam, 15:21
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, dda1, 15:21
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., dda1, 15:19
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Sue..., 14:58
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Jan Panteltje, 14:50
Re: A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., Sam Wormley, 14:35
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 14:29
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Sam Wormley, 14:24
Re: Can energy impact solids?, mrdarrett, 14:23
A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe., GSS, 14:19
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, GSS, 14:16
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 14:10
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, GSS, 14:02
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, GSS, 13:54
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, kenseto, 13:51
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, FrediFizzx, 13:43
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Smolley, 13:36
Re: Clean room--definition?, Helmut Wabnig, 13:29
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Jan Panteltje, 13:25
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, CWatters, 13:25
Re: Whwho is a bigger cretin: Y.Porat or Mukesh Prasad ? Brian D. Jones or Pntcho Valev?, dda1, 13:18
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Sorcerer, 13:09
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Sorcerer, 13:08
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Sue..., 13:05
Re: w is dark energy's ( negative ) pressure over density., Desertphile, 13:05
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, puppet_sock, 12:52
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 12:22
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, surrealistic-dream, 12:12
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Sue..., 12:07
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 11:49
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 11:48
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 11:37
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 11:33
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Sam Wormley, 11:30
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George Dishman, 11:24
God likes curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:16
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:15
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, PD, 10:59
Re: Can energy impact solids?, PD, 10:39
Re: This thread is _Huge_, it should look like this..., T Wake, 10:34
Re: Erwin_Moller, Flame on... see where that gets you., T Wake, 10:33
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Sue..., 10:28
Re: Whwho is a bigger cretin: Y.Porat or Mukesh Prasad ? Brian D. Jones or Pntcho Valev?, Y.Porat, 10:26
Re: Whwho is a bigger cretin: Y.Porat or Mukesh Prasad ? Brian D. Jones or Pntcho Valev?, dda1, 10:09
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 10:08
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, dda1, 10:07
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, dda1, 10:06
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Sue..., 10:06
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, dda1, 10:05
"Gravity", Yad, 10:04
Re: Who says the CMB could not have been produced via w = -1 ?, T Wake, 10:01
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, BlagooBlanaa, 10:00
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, kenseto, 09:58
Re: Who says the CMB could not have been produced via w = -1 ?, T Wake, 09:57
Re: Who says the CMB could not have been produced via w = -1 ?, T Wake, 09:56
Re: Zombie slaves from hell., T Wake, 09:54
Re: Clean room--definition?, Randy Poe, 09:54
Re: w is dark energy's ( negative ) pressure over density., T Wake, 09:48
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad., T Wake, 09:46
Re: Kid kids in a pre-school playground, all you can do is call people names., T Wake, 09:41
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, kenseto, 09:33
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, actionintegral, 09:32
Re: Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, Randy Poe, 09:26
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:24
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Mike, 09:22
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:21
Re: w is dark energy's ( negative ) pressure over density., CreateThis, 09:19
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:18
Electron Orbits in Hydrogen atom, GSS, 09:12
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Mandy Meson, 09:07
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Ray Haddad, 08:48
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, GSS, 08:45
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, GSS, 08:14
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, GSS, 08:02
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, uri, 07:48
Clean room--definition?, jmfbahciv, 07:20
Re: Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, Sue..., 07:07
Re: Swing and momentum, jmfbahciv, 06:47
Re: Who says the CMB could not have been produced via w = -1 ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:38
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:32
Re: Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, Sue..., 06:23
Re: Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, Sue..., 06:03
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, jmfbahciv, 05:46
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Bilge, 05:43
Re: ? why can one solve Helmholtz eqn in one z-dir along, Timo A. Nieminen, 05:27
Physical Space, Aether and Vacuum, GSS, 05:19
Permittivity and Permeability Constants of Vacuum, GSS, 05:12
Notion of Time in Physics without Relativity, GSS, 05:07
Re: Taking human culture to universe., The Real Chris, 05:02
Re: God likes curses, CrankHater, 05:00
Re: Whwho is a bigger cretin: Y.Porat or Mukesh Prasad ? Brian D. Jones or Pntcho Valev?, CrankHater, 04:50
Re: Zombie slaves from hell., CrankHater, 04:41
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Martin Hogbin, 04:37
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, CWatters, 03:33
Whwho is a bigger cretin: Y.Porat or Mukesh Prasad ? Brian D. Jones or Pntcho Valev?, Y.Porat, 01:56
Re: This thread is _Huge_, it should look like this..., Marc, 01:30
This thread is _Huge_, it should look like this..., Jeff…Relf, 01:11
Re: Who says the CMB could not have been produced via w = -1 ?, Jeff…Relf, 00:57
w is dark energy's ( negative ) pressure over density., Jeff…Relf, 00:29
Re: ? why can one solve Helmholtz eqn in one z-dir along, Cheng Cosine, 00:24
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Jerry, 00:23
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George, 00:16

June 15, 2006

Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 23:49
Re: ? why can one solve Helmholtz eqn in one z-dir along, Timo Nieminen, 23:37
Repulsion binds atoms, Sam Wormley, 23:33
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 22:52
Re: Blackbody spectrum, Finder, 22:16
? why can one solve Helmholtz eqn in one z-dir along, Cheng Cosine, 21:40
Re: THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:13
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:12
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 21:10
THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE, ACE, 21:09
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Sorcerer, 21:08
Re: Blackbody spectrum, Sorcerer, 21:04
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:58
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad., Jeff…Relf, 20:55
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:54
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 20:51
Re: Swing and momentum, Edward Green, 20:43
Kid kids in a pre-school playground, all you can do is call people names., Jeff…Relf, 20:42
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Tom Roberts, 20:42
Re: Duckie, why is your butt expanding ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:35
Duckie, why is your butt expanding ?, Jeff…Relf, 20:31
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:30
Zombie slaves from hell., Jeff…Relf, 20:27
Re: Who says the CMB could not have been produced via w = -1 ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 20:25
Who says the CMB could not have been produced via w = -1 ?, Jeff…Relf, 20:18
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:15
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:13
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:48
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 19:40
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Llanzlan Klazmon, 19:38
Re: Quantum physics - Collapse of quantum wavefunction, wate, 19:32
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 19:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 19:21
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:09
Re: Quantum physics - Collapse of quantum wavefunction, Bob Cain, 19:08
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 19:04
Re: what is quantum diagonal?, Bob Cain, 19:04
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:55
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 18:45
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:37
Re: falsies - your turn, Robin Levett, 18:35
Re: Erwin_Moller, Flame on... see where that gets you., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:21
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 18:21
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Uncle Clover, 18:19
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Brad Guth, 18:18
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Finder, 18:08
Re: Blackbody spectrum, Giorgio Pastore, 17:58
Re: Erwin_Moller, Flame on... see where that gets you., neverbetter, 17:54
Re: Blackbody spectrum, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:52
Re: Blackbody spectrum, Giorgio Pastore, 17:50
Re: Blackbody spectrum, Finder, 17:49
Erwin_Moller, Flame on... see where that gets you., Jeff…Relf, 17:40
Re: Blackbody spectrum, actionintegral, 17:30
Re: Blackbody spectrum, actionintegral, 17:28
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, PD, 17:12
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Randy Poe, 17:08
Re: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Sorcerer, 17:05
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Randy Poe, 17:05
Re: Blackbody spectrum, Sorcerer, 17:03
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Brad Guth, 16:52
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 16:44
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 16:28
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 63: If Subtraction is More Fundamental Than Integration vs Differentiation, Then What Happens to Functional Analysis?, vanep, 16:21
Blackbody spectrum, Giorgio Pastore, 16:21
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 16:15
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, T Wake, 16:03
Re: I thought lambda was constant back in 2003., David Ewan Kahana, 16:00
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Albert Nurick, 15:53
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 15:51
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 15:48
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 15:45
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 15:32
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 15:31
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 15:26
PING: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 15:23
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 15:19
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 15:17
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 15:17
PING: Anyone. PD deserves a saucerhead nommination ... was: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 15:13
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 15:12
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 14:59
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 14:35
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 14:29
Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope, top9, 14:22
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Rising-Star8471, 13:22
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Igor, 13:11
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:02
Re: I first studied the WMAP site 3 years ago., T Wake, 13:01
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad., T Wake, 13:00
Re: Cosmic background uniformity, T Wake, 12:56
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, greysky, 12:54
Re: I first studied the WMAP site 3 years ago., Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:54
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Ken S. Tucker, 12:53
Re: w = -1 for eons prior to the first light of the CBM., Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:53
Re: I first studied the WMAP site 3 years ago., T Wake, 12:51
Re: w = -1 for eons prior to the first light of the CBM., T Wake, 12:46
Re: Ethen, the 18 year old kid who stole my canned air..., T Wake, 12:43
Re: dedanoe's bombmobile, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:35
Re: dedanoe's bombmobile, Igor, 12:28
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 12:26
Re: Inflation does not have to be rapid to solve the horizon problem., T Wake, 12:26
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad., Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:21
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 12:16
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, PD, 12:03
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 12:00
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Rising-Star8471, 12:00
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad., T Wake, 12:00
Re: The direction of time and entropy are irrelevant., T Wake, 11:58
Re: I thought lambda was constant back in 2003., T Wake, 11:57
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 11:55
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 11:53
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 11:52
Re: The direction of time and entropy are irrelevant., T Wake, 11:52
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 11:48
Re: Can energy impact solids?, PD, 11:32
Re: Can energy impact solids?, PD, 11:30
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 11:14
God likes curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:13
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, PD, 11:04
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 10:55
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 10:51
Re: On Holism and Emergence, zinnic, 10:49
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 10:39
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 10:33
Re: Can energy impact solids?, Sam Wormley, 10:33
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Jeff Root, 10:24
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Richard Saam, 10:17
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 10:14
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Finder, 10:12
Re: Noether's Theorem, CrankHater, 10:11
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:11
Re: I thought lambda was constant back in 2003., CrankHater, 10:09
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Ray Haddad, 10:09
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad., CrankHater, 10:08
Re: On Holism and Emergence, zinnic, 10:06
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 09:49
Re: What's next ?, CrankHater, 09:47
Re: Feeding the trolls Was: What's next ?, CrankHater, 09:46
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, uri, 09:46
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Rising-Star8471, 09:36
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George, 09:35
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Rising-Star8471, 09:34
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Rising-Star8471, 09:29
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 09:29
Re: Did Variable-Light-Speed Cosmology Originate With Hawking's Idea?, dda1, 09:26
"The Source of Gravitational Energy", Yad, 09:24
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, George, 09:23
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 63: If Subtraction is More Fundamental Than Integration vs Differentiation, Then What Happens to Functional Analysis?, Finder, 09:19
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:15
Re: Can energy impact solids?, PD, 09:02
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, michaeld, 08:57
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Uncle Clover, 08:38
Re: Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, ca314159, 08:24
Re: Taking human culture to universe., G. L. Bradford, 08:04
Decomposers, uri, 07:58
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 07:40
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 07:34
Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous, Joe Jakarta, 07:19
Re: w = -1 for eons prior to the first light of the CBM., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:02
Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, top9, 06:39
Re: Looking for a paper of vibrations, ftec, 06:20
Re: Did Variable-Light-Speed Cosmology Originate With Hawking's Idea?, Joe Jakarta, 06:16
Re: Did Variable-Light-Speed Cosmology Originate With Hawking's Idea?, Joe Jakarta, 06:14
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, jmfbahciv, 05:37
I thought lambda was constant back in 2003., Jeff…Relf, 05:36
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 05:32
Re: The direction of time and entropy are irrelevant., Erwin Moller, 05:28
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 05:22
Universal Leverian Method of Approximations by dedanoe, dedanoe, 05:16
Re: dedanoe's bombmobile, dedanoe, 05:03
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, PD, 04:19
Re: Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 04:08
w = -1 for eons prior to the first light of the CBM., Jeff…Relf, 03:40
Re: Fluid Flow, Timo A. Nieminen, 03:16
Re: Why couldn't an ever-constant lambda, w = -1, explain the pre CMB universe ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 02:43
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad., Phineas T Puddleduck, 02:29
Re: Why couldn't an ever-constant lambda, w = -1, explain the pre CMB universe ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 02:24
Ethen, the 18 year old kid who stole my canned air..., Jeff…Relf, 02:17
Why couldn't an ever-constant lambda, w = -1, explain the pre CMB universe ?, Jeff…Relf, 01:58
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 63: If Subtraction is More Fundamental Than Integration vs Differentiation, Then What Happens to Functional Analysis?, vanep, 01:46
Re: The direction of time and entropy are irrelevant., Timberwoof, 01:45
Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad., Jeff…Relf, 01:31
The direction of time and entropy are irrelevant., Jeff…Relf, 01:15
Re: Can energy impact solids?, Roy L . Fuchs, 00:58
Inflation does not have to be rapid to solve the horizon problem., Jeff…Relf, 00:50
The detection of primordial gravity waves would provide..., Jeff…Relf, 00:39
Can energy impact solids?, kumar, 00:12

June 14, 2006

Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Roy L . Fuchs, 23:49
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Uncle Clover, 23:24
Scientists have discovered a novel form of solid carbon dioxide, Sam Wormley, 22:45
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Eric Gisse, 22:09
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 65: (Convolution) Integral Equations, OsherD, 21:46
Re: what is quantum diagonal?, Henning Makholm, 21:42
Re: what is quantum diagonal?, Henning Makholm, 21:40
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Brad Guth, 21:39
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 65: (Convolution) Integral Equations, OsherD, 21:16
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:11
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 65: (Convolution) Integral Equations, OsherD, 21:10
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, actionintegral, 21:05
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Eric Gisse, 20:43
Re: what is quantum diagonal?, Orki, 20:41
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 20:22
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, Don A. Gilmore, 19:08
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 18:43
Re: Noether's Theorem, Sorcerer, 18:38
Re: The first physics equation, will1, 18:35
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, Ken S. Tucker, 18:33
Re: I am confused on this problem, Sorcerer, 18:32
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, PD, 18:18
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, actionintegral, 18:14
Re: The first physics equation, will1, 18:13
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Henry Haapalainen, 18:12
Re: Taking human culture to universe., The Real Chris, 18:07
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, Ken S. Tucker, 17:47
Re: falsification - trying again - no slide rules please., Robin Levett, 17:31
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 17:31
Re: Cosmic background uniformity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:22
Re: Cosmic background uniformity, T Wake, 17:20
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 17:10
Re: The first physics equation, Ken S. Tucker, 17:01
Re: Cosmic background uniformity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:55
Re: Cosmic background uniformity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:52
Re: Cosmic background uniformity, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:49
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, PD, 16:37
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, tadchem, 16:35
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, PD, 16:30
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, PD, 16:29
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, actionintegral, 16:29
Re: The first physics equation, PD, 16:22
Re: The first physics equation, Andy Resnick, 16:20
Re: Fluid Flow, Jeff, 16:19
Re: Cosmic background uniformity, Randy Poe, 16:16
Re: The first physics equation, MobyDikc, 16:14
Re: Cosmic background uniformity, Sam Wormley, 16:07
Cosmic background uniformity, Tony M, 16:00
Re: The first physics equation, Ken S. Tucker, 15:58
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 15:52
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 15:51
Re: Noether's Theorem, PD, 15:45
Re: Fluid Flow, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:43
Re: The first physics equation, PD, 15:36
Re: Quantum physics - Collapse of quantum wavefunction, PD, 15:24
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 63: If Subtraction is More Fundamental Than Integration vs Differentiation, Then What Happens to Functional Analysis?, OsherD, 14:54
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 64: Causation As Generalized Time-Convolution in Functional Analysis, OsherD, 14:45
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 64: Causation As Generalized Time-Convolution in Functional Analysis, OsherD, 14:40
Re: Quantum physics - Collapse of quantum wavefunction, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 14:39
Re: Fluid Flow, Paul Cardinale, 14:37
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 14:35
Re: I first studied the WMAP site 3 years ago., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:34
Re: I first studied the WMAP site 3 years ago., T Wake, 14:30
Secret negotiations gone bad? :-), Math Freak, 14:29
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Hayek, 14:28
Re: Fluid Flow, CWatters, 14:26
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 14:25
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, T Wake, 14:02
Re: How gravity waves effected the CMB anisotropies., T Wake, 13:59
Re: WikiPedia is unfaithful to the <PRE> tag concept., T Wake, 13:57
Re: Eating, sleeping, sex, excercise... life is simple., T Wake, 13:56
Re: I first studied the WMAP site 3 years ago., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:54
Re: I first studied the WMAP site 3 years ago., T Wake, 13:51
Quantum physics - Collapse of quantum wavefunction, PaulHjelmstad, 13:16
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 13:16
Re: The observable universe is _Much_ older than 13.7 billion years., T Wake, 13:14
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 13:09
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 13:05
The first physics equation, MobyDikc, 13:02
Re: Smells like dog spirit, Igor, 12:55
Re: MAN'S EVOLUTION -- BUT IT'S REALLY POLLUTION, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:45
Re: Noether's Theorem, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:39
Re: Noether's Theorem, puppet_sock, 12:36
Re: dedanoe's bombmobile, Igor, 12:35
Fluid Flow, Jeff, 12:34
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, srp, 12:32
Re: Noether's Theorem, actionintegral, 12:26
MAN'S EVOLUTION -- BUT IT'S REALLY POLLUTION, Ed Conrad, 11:39
Re: distant feeling and action-at-a-distance, Mary K, 11:32
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 63: If Subtraction is More Fundamental Than Integration vs Differentiation, Then What Happens to Functional Analysis?, Mary K, 11:31
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, mmeron, 11:24
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Greg Hansen, 10:40
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Ray Haddad, 10:31
Re: what is quantum diagonal?, Henning Makholm, 10:30
Re: Swing and momentum, Henning Makholm, 10:26
Re: Quantization of thermal spectra from planets, Randy Poe, 10:24
Re: Quantization of thermal spectra from planets, Henning Makholm, 10:13
Re: I am confused on this problem, Henning Makholm, 10:02
Re: Looking for "Thermal Comparator" info, CWatters, 08:52
"The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Yad, 08:46
Re: I am confused on this problem, CWatters, 08:39
Re: I am confused on this problem, Vichu, 07:59
Re: could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!???, leadbeat8, 07:57
Re: Smells like dog spirit, donstockbauer, 07:56
Re: On Holism and Emergence, donstockbauer, 07:46
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Richard Herring, 07:24
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Boris Mohar, 07:18
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Bruce Barnett, 07:07
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, jmfbahciv, 07:02
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, jmfbahciv, 07:00
Smells like dog spirit, dedanoe, 06:35
Robin the mother in hood!, dedanoe, 06:34
Re: dedanoe's bombmobile, dedanoe, 06:30
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, Bob Cain, 05:55
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, jmfbahciv, 05:29
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, BernardZ, 05:22
Re: On Holism and Emergence, Brian Fletcher, 03:53
Re: distant feeling and action-at-a-distance, Brian Fletcher, 03:29
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 63: If Subtraction is More Fundamental Than Integration vs Differentiation, Then What Happens to Functional Analysis?, OsherD, 03:26
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 62: A Strange Aspect of Sir Isaac, Leibniz, and Fermat, OsherD, 02:50
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 62: A Strange Aspect of Sir Isaac, Leibniz, and Fermat, OsherD, 02:39
Re: WHAT IS A HUMAN BEING?, fastillion, 02:26
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, G. L. Bradford, 02:16
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 62: A Strange Aspect of Sir Isaac, Leibniz, and Fermat, OsherD, 01:55
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:51
I am confused on this problem, Preston, 01:50
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:45
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Fred J . McCall, 01:39
Re: The True Meaning of Bayesianism, OsherD, 01:29
Re: On Holism and Emergence, zinnic, 01:19
Re: could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!???, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 00:20
Re: WHAT IS A HUMAN BEING?, Sir Frederick, 00:16
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Bilge, 00:09

June 13, 2006

Re: could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!???, lal_truckee, 23:49
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, mmeron, 23:44
Re: Nothing supports the absurdities of inflation instead of a pre CMB w = -1 ., Timberwoof, 23:35
Re: what is quantum diagonal?, Orki, 23:31
Re: what is quantum diagonal?, Orki, 23:21
Re: what is quantum diagonal?, donstockbauer, 23:03
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, putrescine, 22:35
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, putrescine, 22:33
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 22:28
Re: WHAT IS A HUMAN BEING?, uri, 22:28
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 21:59
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 21:51
what is quantum diagonal?, Orki, 21:51
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Tom Roberts, 21:44
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Tom Roberts, 21:42
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 21:35
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 21:29
Re: Pressing Observational Anomalies in Physics Today, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 21:24
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 21:23
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, mmeron, 21:23
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 21:18
Re: could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!???, Ed T, 21:12
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, mmeron, 21:12
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, Timo Nieminen, 21:07
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, Bob Cain, 20:39
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Sam Wormley, 20:04
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, mmeron, 19:54
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Eric Gisse, 19:29
Re: distant feeling and action-at-a-distance, Immortalist, 19:07
Re: could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!???, OG, 19:05
Re: distant feeling and action-at-a-distance, Sam Wormley, 18:58
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 18:55
distant feeling and action-at-a-distance, uri, 18:51
Re: Swing and momentum, Edward Green, 18:48
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Edward Green, 18:38
Re: could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!???, donstockbauer, 18:33
Re: could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!???, Sam Wormley, 18:26
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Bob Cain, 18:22
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, guskz, 18:11
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Matt Giwer, 18:06
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Henry Haapalainen, 18:02
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 17:48
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, tadchem, 17:46
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., Dirk Van de moortel, 17:38
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:37
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 17:35
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 17:33
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tim, 17:32
Re: Pressing Observational Anomalies in Physics Today, Eric Gisse, 17:15
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 17:12
Looking for "Thermal Comparator" info, Paul Ciszek, 17:10
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 234), jhnrmsdn, 17:09
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., PD, 17:06
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Eric Gisse, 17:03
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 234), Ken S. Tucker, 16:45
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., CarpeDiem . InVino, 16:39
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., PD, 16:37
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., PD, 16:35
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., Timo A. Nieminen, 16:33
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, platopes, 16:32
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, FrediFizzx, 16:21
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., CarpeDiem . InVino, 16:21
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., Igor, 16:18
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., CarpeDiem . InVino, 16:11
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 234), QncyMI, 16:09
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., Randy Poe, 16:03
Re: Pressing Observational Anomalies in Physics Today, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:02
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., Dirk Van de moortel, 16:01
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., CarpeDiem . InVino, 16:00
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., PD, 15:57
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., Randy Poe, 15:55
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:43
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 234), Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:42
Re: Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., CarpeDiem . InVino, 15:41
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:38
Newton's 2nd Law Problem..., CarpeDiem . InVino, 15:36
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 234), Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:30
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof, Randy Poe, 15:17
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, Ken S. Tucker, 14:31
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, mmeron, 14:27
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, PD, 14:19
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, mmeron, 14:03
Re: How gravity waves effected the CMB anisotropies., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:52
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, PD, 13:45
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Sam Wormley, 13:43
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Sam Wormley, 13:43
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, PD, 13:40
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 13:23
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 13:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 13:20
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 13:17
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 13:16
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 13:15
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 13:12
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 13:11
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 13:11
Re: dedanoe's bombmobile, Igor, 13:10
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 13:04
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 13:01
Re: Slow load vs Fast load, boson boss, 13:00
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, PD, 12:57
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 12:54
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 12:53
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 12:52
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 12:46
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 12:41
Re: On Holism and Emergence, donstockbauer, 12:32
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:24
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Richard Herring, 12:19
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 12:19
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:11
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 12:10
Re: Large matrix calculation, puppet_sock, 12:03
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 234), Ken S. Tucker, 11:59
Re: TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, mmeron, 11:46
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 11:44
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:37
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 11:32
Re: Large matrix calculation, Ian Parker, 11:30
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 11:29
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 11:24
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 11:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 11:20
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 11:15
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 11:07
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:07
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, island, 11:04
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 11:04
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:00
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 10:54
Re: Did Variable-Light-Speed Cosmology Originate With Hawking's Idea?, dda1, 10:48
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Richard Herring, 10:46
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 10:46
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 10:45
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:41
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:39
Re: The True Meaning of Bayesianism, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:30
Re: Large matrix calculation, DanielK, 10:30
dedanoe's bombmobile, dedanoe, 10:13
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 10:13
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 09:56
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:50
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 09:50
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, briggs, 09:42
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, kenseto, 09:41
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 09:40
"Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Yad, 09:20
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 09:11
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 09:01
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 08:52
Re: Swing and momentum, Henning Makholm, 08:45
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, Henning Makholm, 08:43
Re: The Newtonian version of E = mc^2, Greg Neill, 08:40
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, PD, 08:36
Re: The True Meaning of Bayesianism, Harry, 08:15
Re: Large matrix calculation, Sorcerer, 08:05
Re: On Holism and Emergence, Brian Fletcher, 08:00
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, Sorcerer, 07:53
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 07:37
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 07:33
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 07:11
A NEW KIND OF ACOUSTIC LASER, Sam Wormley, 07:11
TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY, Sam Wormley, 07:10
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 07:10
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Raving Loonie, 07:07
Re: Nothing supports the absurdities of inflation instead of a pre CMB w = -1 ., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:26
Re: I first studied the WMAP site 3 years ago., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:25
Re: Nothing supports the absurdities of inflation instead of a pre CMB w = -1 ., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:24
Re: Nothing supports the absurdities of inflation instead of a pre CMB w = -1 ., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:23
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:18
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, jmfbahciv, 06:17
WikiPedia is unfaithful to the <PRE> tag concept., Jeff…Relf, 06:13
How gravity waves effected the CMB anisotropies., Jeff…Relf, 05:59
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Jan Panteltje, 05:38
Re: Faster than light? Don't be in the dark., Sorcerer, 05:25
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Joe Jakarta, 05:20
Re: Did Variable-Light-Speed Cosmology Originate With Hawking's Idea?, Joe Jakarta, 05:08
Re: Did Variable-Light-Speed Cosmology Originate With Hawking's Idea?, Joe Jakarta, 05:06
Eating, sleeping, sex, excercise... life is simple., Jeff…Relf, 04:59
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Richard Herring, 04:54
Re: The Newtonian version of E = mc^2 (was: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?), Sorcerer, 04:52
Large matrix calculation, DanielK, 04:48
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, Mike, 04:00
Nothing supports the absurdities of inflation instead of a pre CMB w = -1 ., Jeff…Relf, 03:59
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 03:55
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 03:54
I first studied the WMAP site 3 years ago., Jeff…Relf, 03:45
Nothing supports the absurdities of inflation instead of a pre CMB w = -1 ., Jeff…Relf, 03:42
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, vps137, 03:31
Re: Simple question about curving soccer balls, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 03:22
Re: The True Meaning of Bayesianism, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 02:41
Faster than light? Don't be in the dark., will1, 02:29
Re: On Holism and Emergence, uri, 02:27
Re: The True Meaning of Bayesianism, OsherD, 02:20
Nothing supports the absurdities of inflation instead of a pre CMB w = -1 ., Jeff…Relf, 02:07
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, jdesoto79, 01:41
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Timo Nieminen, 01:30
The True Meaning of Bayesianism, Edward Green, 01:04
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 00:58
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, tdp1001, 00:53
Pressing Observational Anomalies in Physics Today, Jack Sarfatti, 00:43
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, mmeron, 00:27
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 00:20
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Jim Davis, 00:15
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, Gary Sokolich, 00:15
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 00:13
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Edward Green, 00:12

June 12, 2006

REQ: Coud anyone post the audio CD's of - The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. 5 thru 8 ?, dweller, 23:57
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, rangeravenger, 23:52
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Edward Green, 23:49
Question about nucleosynthesis, Radium, 23:29
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, pete, 23:18
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 23:18
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Uncle Clover, 23:10
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 22:58
RAVE REVIEWS -- Re: EVOLUTION GOES BELLY UP ON LARRY KING LIVE -- That SOB of an Ed Conrad, Ed Conrad, 22:37
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Bruce Barnett, 22:31
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, bombs_away, 22:01
Re: apollo proof of hoax, Brad Guth, 21:46
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Llanzlan Klazmon, 21:15
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 20:00
Re: The Newtonian version of E = mc^2, srp, 19:49
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 19:46
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, mmeron, 19:41
Re: MIND SCANNER weapons: Zarqawi did not die instantly, Franzeska Fukiyama imi, 19:35
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:27
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tim, 19:25
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 19:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tim, 19:15
Re: The observable universe is _Much_ older than 13.7 billion years., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:49
The observable universe is _Much_ older than 13.7 billion years., Jeff…Relf, 18:41
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 18:39
Re: On Holism and Emergence, donstockbauer, 18:34
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Eric Gisse, 18:29
Re: Strong and weak nuclear forces, Rock Brentwood, 18:26
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, CWatters, 18:19
Re: Article: Do the cosmic twist, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:17
Re: The Planck_Length_Transition of the observable universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:16
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 18:16
Article: Do the cosmic twist, Robert Karl Stonjek, 18:15
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, PD, 18:01
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 17:54
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 17:54
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:53
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, Sorcerer, 17:53
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, mmeron, 17:52
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:51
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Sorcerer, 17:46
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Eric Gisse, 17:42
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 17:42
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Sorcerer, 17:30
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 17:27
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:22
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, donstockbauer, 17:21
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Jan Panteltje, 17:15
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 17:11
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Sam Wormley, 17:08
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, panteltje, 17:07
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, mmeron, 17:02
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 16:51
Re: Why is charge quantized?, Ken S. Tucker, 16:50
Re: Why is charge quantized?, tadchem, 16:44
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 16:43
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, T Wake, 16:43
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, tadchem, 16:37
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 16:36
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, T Wake, 16:36
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:30
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, PD, 16:29
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., T Wake, 16:26
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:23
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, FrediFizzx, 16:22
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., T Wake, 16:16
The Newtonian version of E = mc^2 (was: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?), Rock Brentwood, 16:13
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:11
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., T Wake, 16:07
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:06
Re: Why is charge quantized?, Rock Brentwood, 16:02
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, panteltje, 16:01
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:53
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:53
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Ronald RNR, 15:50
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Ronald RNR, 15:46
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 15:40
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Hagar, 15:40
MIND SCANNER weapons: Zarqawi did not die instantly, Exim Bank Weapons Systems, 15:36
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, Rock Brentwood, 15:24
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Rock Brentwood, 15:22
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Sam Wormley, 15:20
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:18
Re: My letter to the newYork Times about: ''A Ring Tone Meant to Fall on Deaf Ears'', CWatters, 15:15
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, CWatters, 15:14
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Ronald RNR, 15:13
Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Brad Guth, 15:11
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:03
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Sam Wormley, 14:59
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., T Wake, 14:59
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:54
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, T Wake, 14:52
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:51
Re: "The Einstein Hoax", Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:50
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Eric Gisse, 14:50
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Eric Gisse, 14:50
"The Einstein Hoax", Yad, 14:49
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 14:43
Re: OMEGA of the thermal field, T=2.7 K is 2/3, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:43
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:41
OMEGA of the thermal field, T=2.7 K is 2/3, NILS B�RJESSON, 14:39
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:37
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Eric Gisse, 14:37
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:33
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Sam Wormley, 14:32
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., T Wake, 14:26
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Sam Wormley, 14:25
Re: What is the error in my calculation?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 14:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:21
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 14:17
What is the error in my calculation?, Ronald RNR, 14:16
Re: Holism versus reductionism, Immortalist, 14:15
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:00
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 13:57
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., T Wake, 13:57
Re: Jeff_Relf has made about 150 posts to WikiPedia since May 2005., T Wake, 13:54
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, T Wake, 13:53
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, brian a m stuckless, 13:50
Re: Jeff_Relf has made about 150 posts to WikiPedia since May 2005., T Wake, 13:48
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 13:47
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Mike Combs, 13:46
Re: Jeff_Relf has made about 150 posts to WikiPedia since May 2005., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:39
Re: Jeff_Relf has made about 150 posts to WikiPedia since May 2005., T Wake, 13:37
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, puppet_sock, 13:34
On Holism and Emergence, Sir Frederick, 13:31
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, puppet_sock, 13:30
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:29
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 13:28
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., T Wake, 13:24
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, Sorcerer, 13:21
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Jerry, 13:21
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 13:21
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Igor, 13:19
Re: Standard Snowflake Question, Andy Resnick, 13:15
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 13:11
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 13:11
Re: Standard Snowflake Question, puppet_sock, 12:57
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, Sam Wormley, 12:57
Re: Quantization of thermal spectra from planets, PD, 12:53
Re: Standard Snowflake Question, Sorcerer, 12:45
Re: newtonian physics thought excercise, Mike, 12:40
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Mike, 12:33
newtonian physics thought excercise, jdesoto79, 12:23
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, CoreyWhite, 11:54
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:45
Re: Standard Snowflake Question, daveatfernie, 11:44
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, John C . Polasek, 11:42
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, mmeron, 11:28
Re: Standard Snowflake Question, rtonyreeder, 11:19
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 11:09
Re: Standard Snowflake Question, Sir Frederick, 11:01
God is pure, kurtstocklmeir, 11:00
Re: curses, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:59
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Tom Potter, 10:54
Re: Time & Space Dimensions - why different?, John C . Polasek, 10:48
Re: God is fair, Don Salad, 10:47
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:42
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:40
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:40
Re: can't remeber the name..., John C . Polasek, 10:35
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bilge, 10:28
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:21
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 10:21
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:17
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 10:14
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:06
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 10:05
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 10:04
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:01
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 09:56
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:55
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, donstockbauer, 09:54
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:54
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:53
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 09:48
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 09:42
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:41
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:28
Beziering levers, dedanoe, 09:23
Beziering levers, dedanoe, 09:23
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 09:20
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, briggs, 09:15
Re: Standard Snowflake Question, Sam Wormley, 09:02
Re: Looking for a paper of vibrations, Andy Resnick, 08:54
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, Andy Resnick, 08:40
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, briggs, 08:31
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:49
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, jmfbahciv, 07:40
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:14
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:05
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:58
Re: The observed lambda is a from of inflation, just slower and ever-constant., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:55
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, jmfbahciv, 06:48
My letter to the newYork Times about: ''A Ring Tone Meant to Fall on Deaf Ears'', Jan Panteltje, 06:37
Re: Slow load vs Fast load, andy everett, 06:24
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 12, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:41
Standard Snowflake Question, Sir Frederick, 05:33
Re: Please help a newbie..., Bilge, 05:27
Re: Please help a newbie..., Bilge, 05:21
Re: Slow load vs Fast load, Sorcerer, 04:58
Re: SFT and Nuclear Physics, Dr Photon, 04:50
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Al Hastings, 04:33
Jeff_Relf has made about 150 posts to WikiPedia since May 2005., Jeff…Relf, 03:31
Re: Slow load vs Fast load, Ken S. Tucker, 02:25
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 61: Measures including M(X), OsherD, 02:14
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, T Wake, 02:08
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, FrediFizzx, 02:05
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., T Wake, 01:59
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 61: Measures including M(X), OsherD, 01:55
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 61: Measures including M(X), Amiey, 01:52
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Mad Prof, 01:49
Re: The Hand_Of_God spinning the Planck length transition... ha ha., T Wake, 01:46
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 61: Measures including M(X), OsherD, 01:45
Re: Holism versus reductionism, uri, 01:31
Slow load vs Fast load, Linda, 01:21
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 00:57
Smoking Gun Graph for Global Warming?, W. Watson, 00:50
Re: God is fair, James "Kibo" Parry, 00:18

June 11, 2006

Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, mmeron, 23:54
Signed Feynman items on EBAY, Gery Scott, 23:52
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, mmeron, 23:51
Signed Feynman items on EBAY, Gery Scott, 23:51
Re: Swing and momentum, mmeron, 23:48
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Eric Gisse, 23:45
Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition..., Jeff…Relf, 23:45
Re: Time & Space Dimensions - why different?, delversisogna, 23:45
Time & Space Dimensions - why different?, delversisogna, 23:42
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Sam Wormley, 23:38
Freeman Dyson--Nuclear Reactors, W. Watson, 23:32
Freemand and George Dyson, W. Watson, 23:30
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, donstockbauer, 23:27
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Edward Green, 23:05
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Phineas T Puddleduck, 23:03
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 22:55
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Sam Wormley, 22:49
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, uray, 22:48
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Sam Wormley, 22:46
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Y.Porat, 22:38
Re: Swing and momentum, Edward Green, 22:34
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, FrediFizzx, 22:26
can't remeber the name..., zomoco1, 22:26
Re: Swing and momentum, Edward Green, 22:25
Re: The Hand_Of_God spinning the Planck length transition... ha ha., Eric Gisse, 22:20
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Edward Green, 22:11
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, tdp1001, 22:10
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, mitchell_leary, 21:59
Re: Why is charge quantized?, FrediFizzx, 21:52
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phil Wheeler, 21:31
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 21:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phil Wheeler, 20:40
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 20:38
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Dan Wood, 20:33
Re: Why is charge quantized?, Henning Makholm, 20:30
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Roberts, 20:25
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 20:12
Re: soc.men.moderated moderated, Kadaitcha Man, 20:11
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:56
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 19:45
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, michaeld, 19:45
Re: Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, donstockbauer, 19:41
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 19:27
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:20
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:17
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 19:06
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 19:01
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 18:51
Re: Simple question about curving soccer balls, Jeffrey Rolland, 18:44
Re: collision between two two-dimensional lines, bgold, 18:34
Re: Bermuda Triangle, John, 18:24
Re: Holism versus reductionism, tooly, 18:09
Re: Taking human culture to universe., The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
Re: Simple question about curving soccer balls, Jeffrey Rolland, 17:57
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, T Wake, 17:53
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Greg Neill, 17:51
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, T Wake, 17:29
Re: Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:25
Mature Galaxies, Cluster, Found Ten Billion Light Years Away, G. L. Bradford, 17:17
Re: physicists say it is possible to build a tiny refrigerator, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:00
Is the Anthropic Principle Dead, Dan Wood, 16:56
Re: Simple question about curving soccer balls, spock, 16:34
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is a bit of Trans_Planck_Length voodoo., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:32
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is a bit of Trans_Planck_Length voodoo., T Wake, 16:30
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is a bit of Trans_Planck_Length voodoo., Timberwoof, 16:26
Re: The Hand_Of_God spinning the Planck length transition... ha ha., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:15
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 16:08
Re: The Hand_Of_God spinning the Planck length transition... ha ha., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:07
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 16:04
Re: The Hand_Of_God spinning the Planck length transition... ha ha., Eric Gisse, 16:02
Re: Holism versus reductionism, DjApAnA, 15:43
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 15:36
Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Brad Guth, 15:34
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 15:33
Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, T Wake, 15:23
Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Brad Guth, 15:17
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, Igor, 15:17
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Mike, 15:15
Re: Swing and momentum, mmeron, 15:13
Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Brad Guth, 15:06
Re: Bermuda Triangle, Igor, 14:53
Re: Physics is dead!, Paul B. Andersen, 14:41
Re: Holism versus reductionism, donstockbauer, 14:28
Holism versus reductionism, uri, 14:08
Re: soc.men.moderated moderated, Aratzio, 13:28
Re: Why is charge quantized?, uri, 12:49
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:42
Re: Bermuda Triangle, jimp, 12:35
Re: Flourishing fast :-), Jan Panteltje, 12:13
Re: Bermuda Triangle, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:07
Bermuda Triangle, Vichu, 12:02
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, tadchem, 11:57
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 11:54
Re: Physics Olympiad :-), Math Freak, 11:48
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, T Wake, 11:44
Re: Why is charge quantized?, tadchem, 11:44
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, uri, 11:35
Re: Flourishing fast :-), Math Freak, 11:33
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 11:32
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, CoreyWhite, 11:25
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 60: Reminder About Renormalization and Look At 59 Again, John, 11:25
Re: collision between two two-dimensional lines, John, 11:17
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 60: Reminder About Renormalization and Look At 59 Again, OsherD, 11:09
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, tadchem, 11:05
Re: Physics Olympiad :-), Jan Panteltje, 11:05
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 11:04
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, tadchem, 10:59
Physics Olympiad :-), Math Freak, 10:56
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 59: Individualism vs Bureaucracy, Locality, Decomposed Functional Analysis, OsherD, 10:53
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:46
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:45
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 59: Individualism vs Bureaucracy, Locality, Decomposed Functional Analysis, OsherD, 10:43
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Corey, 10:41
Re: Flourishing fast :-), Jan Panteltje, 10:33
Re: Guys if you have savings...., Jan Panteltje, 10:31
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 58: Decomposition of Functional Analysis, Sorcerer, 10:30
"The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Bew, 10:26
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 59: Individualism vs Bureaucracy, Locality, Decomposed Functional Analysis, OsherD, 10:26
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 10:22
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Tom Potter, 10:08
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:08
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 58: Decomposition of Functional Analysis, OsherD, 09:54
Flourishing fast :-), Math Freak, 09:51
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Tom Potter, 09:49
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Vlad, 09:41
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Edward Green, 09:39
Re: Guys if you have savings...., Math Freak, 09:27
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 09:01
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 08:55
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Tom Potter, 08:44
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, 1Z, 08:07
Why is charge quantized?, Henning Makholm, 07:08
Re: I first used the word WMAP over 3 years ago., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:00
Re: The Hand_Of_God spinning the Planck length transition... ha ha., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:56
Re: Swing and momentum, Henning Makholm, 06:50
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:38
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:35
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:30
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, jmfbahciv, 06:11
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 58: Decomposition of Functional Analysis, Sorcerer, 06:10
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, Sorcerer, 05:56
Re: T_Wake, please point me to the part where it says..., T Wake, 05:50
Re: The Hand_Of_God spinning the Planck length transition... ha ha., T Wake, 05:44
Re: I first used the word WMAP over 3 years ago., T Wake, 05:42
Re: The width of the _Observable_ universe is 158 light-years and counting., T Wake, 05:29
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Y.Porat, 05:22
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, donstockbauer, 05:15
T_Wake, please point me to the part where it says..., Jeff…Relf, 05:13
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is a bit of Trans_Planck_Length voodoo., T Wake, 04:58
I first used the word WMAP over 3 years ago., Jeff…Relf, 03:57
Re: Simple question about curving soccer balls, CWatters, 03:52
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, mmeron, 03:22
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 58: Decomposition of Functional Analysis, OsherD, 02:56
The width of the _Observable_ universe is 158 light-years and counting., Jeff…Relf, 02:44
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 58: Decomposition of Functional Analysis, OsherD, 02:41
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 58: Decomposition of Functional Analysis, OsherD, 02:23
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:48
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Edward Green, 01:28
Re: Swing and momentum, mmeron, 01:08
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, mmeron, 00:57
Cosmic_Inflation is a bit of Trans_Planck_Length voodoo., Jeff…Relf, 00:57
Re: Swing and momentum, Edward Green, 00:50
Re: No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, Al Hastings, 00:49
Re: soc.men.moderated moderated, Kadaitcha Man, 00:48
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 780 June 9, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe,Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Bob Cain, 00:46
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bob Cain, 00:33
The Hand_Of_God spinning the Planck length transition... ha ha., Jeff…Relf, 00:32
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 00:18
collision between two two-dimensional lines, bgold, 00:09

June 10, 2006

Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 23:58
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Sam Wormley, 23:38
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Sam Wormley, 23:30
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Tom Potter, 23:17
Re: Simple question about curving soccer balls, jimp, 23:15
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Tom Potter, 23:07
No Explaining The Physics Of Buzz Magnets!!!, CoreyWhite, 22:59
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, facilitator, 22:55
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 22:55
Simple question about curving soccer balls, Jeffrey Rolland, 22:53
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Chris H. Fleming, 22:51
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, uri, 22:43
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Brian Fletcher, 22:02
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, FrediFizzx, 21:52
Re: WMAP's early 2004 data., Eric Gisse, 21:35
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, FrediFizzx, 21:21
Re: All you [Hammond] detractors are the same Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, TeaLady (Mari C.), 21:03
WMAP's early 2004 data., Jeff…Relf, 20:43
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Roberts, 20:28
Re: soc.men.moderated moderated, Aratzio, 20:28
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Sorcerer, 19:54
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 19:49
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, uri, 19:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, kashe, 19:20
Re: soc.men.moderated moderated, Kadaitcha Man, 18:58
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, Sorcerer, 18:58
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Uncle Clover, 18:47
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Uncle Clover, 18:41
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:18
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:14
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:06
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 18:04
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 17:57
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:52
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 17:48
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 17:45
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, FrediFizzx, 17:40
Re: Impossible device at work?, Greg Neill, 17:39
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 17:03
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 16:58
Re: The Friedmann equation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:58
Re: Taking human culture to universe., The Real Chris, 16:57
Re: The Friedmann equation., Eric Gisse, 16:47
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 16:46
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Jan Panteltje, 16:42
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Sam Wormley, 16:25
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:19
Re: Swing and momentum, mmeron, 16:15
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 16:07
Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), joseph2k, 16:05
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Jan Panteltje, 16:01
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Sam Wormley, 15:57
MIND READING SCANNERS: Zarqawi did not die instantly, Kuji Kolchis, 15:56
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 15:48
Re: Article: Variable Physical Laws, neo, 15:41
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Jan Panteltje, 15:39
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, FrediFizzx, 15:38
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:36
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:32
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Jan Panteltje, 15:30
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, jimp, 15:25
Re: The Friedmann equation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:21
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 15:18
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, FrediFizzx, 15:18
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 15:16
Re: The Friedmann equation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:14
Re: Guys if you have savings...., Jan Panteltje, 15:12
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:11
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:10
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Sam Wormley, 15:08
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, Bob Cain, 15:08
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:08
Looking for a paper of vibrations, ftec, 15:05
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 15:04
Re: The Friedmann equation., Eric Gisse, 15:03
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Eric Gisse, 14:59
Re: soc.men.moderated moderated, Aratzio, 14:54
Guys if you have savings...., Math Freak, 14:45
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, FrediFizzx, 14:36
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:28
Re: Hurry up toward Downtown :-), Jan Panteltje, 14:26
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Jan Panteltje, 14:19
Hurry up toward Downtown :-), Math Freak, 14:19
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Sam Wormley, 14:01
Re: Springfield Theory: Mathematical references abound on The Simpsons, Sorcerer, 14:00
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 13:49
Re: Springfield Theory: Mathematical references abound on The Simpsons, Ken S. Tucker, 13:33
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Helmut Wabnig, 13:23
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:16
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 13:15
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Bilge, 13:12
Re: Springfield Theory: Mathematical references abound on The Simpsons, Uncle Al, 13:12
Re: The Friedmann equation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:11
Re: Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, Math Freak, 13:00
Re: Swing and momentum, Edward Green, 12:58
Re: Swing and momentum, Edward Green, 12:55
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 12:54
Re: physicists say it is possible to build a tiny refrigerator, Sorcerer, 12:42
Re: Swing and momentum, Edward Green, 12:41
Re: Swing and momentum, Edward Green, 12:39
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, Sorcerer, 12:38
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, Edward Green, 12:26
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 780 June 9, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe,Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Math Freak, 12:23
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, Math Freak, 12:17
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:46
Re: physicists say it is possible to build a tiny refrigerator, Uncle Al, 11:42
Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Sam Wormley, 11:42
Re: WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, Dave, 11:26
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:24
Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?, Tom Potter, 10:58
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 10:51
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 10:41
Re: Properties of solutions, tadchem, 10:26
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 10:20
Article: Variable Physical Laws, Robert Karl Stonjek, 10:18
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, Greg Hansen, 10:12
Re: Did Variable-Light-Speed Cosmology Originate With Hawking's Idea?, dda1, 09:57
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, tadchem, 09:55
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Bew, 09:51
Re: Source of dirt on the moon? (bootprint...), The Real Chris, 09:32
Re: The Friedmann equation., T Wake, 09:27
Re: soc.men.moderated moderated, Kadaitcha Man, 09:22
Re: WMAP's March 2006 report., T Wake, 09:21
Re: T_Wake, can't you count that high ?, T Wake, 09:13
Re: Where's the F_cking giant butcher ?, T Wake, 09:01
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 08:57
Re: Educated professionals 2, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:59
Re: The Friedmann equation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:58
Re: Educated professionals 2, David Moran, 07:49
Re: soc.men.moderated moderated, dvus, 07:36
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, jmfbahciv, 07:26
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, Petrovitch, 07:21
Did Variable-Light-Speed Cosmology Originate With Hawking's Idea?, Joe Jakarta, 06:42
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Joe Jakarta, 06:30
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Paul Herre, 06:29
Re: WMAP's March 2006 report., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:26
Re: ANALOGY BETWEEN THERMODYNAMICS AND RELATIVITY, donstockbauer, 06:25
Re: The Friedmann equation., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:22
Re: Satellite in starry sky, neo, 06:09
Re: Swing and momentum, jmfbahciv, 05:50
Re: How do we measure a bushel?, Sorcerer, 05:15
Re: Where's the F_cking giant butcher ?, Josh Hayes, 03:26
Re: "Fusion never will be practical.", CWatters, 02:42
Re: soc.men.moderated moderated, Kadaitcha Man, 02:03
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, Bob Cain, 01:36
Re: SFT and Nuclear Physics, tony fleming, 00:21
T_Wake, can't you count that high ?, Jeff…Relf, 00:09
Springfield Theory: Mathematical references abound on The Simpsons, Sam Wormley, 00:05
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Fred J . McCall, 00:00

June 09, 2006

Re: How do we measure a bushel?, jimp, 23:55
WMAP's March 2006 report., Jeff…Relf, 23:42
How do we measure a bushel?, Petrovitch, 23:27
Brilliant conversation of the year award - nomination for., Sorcerer, 22:59
The Friedmann equation., Jeff…Relf, 22:49
physicists say it is possible to build a tiny refrigerator, Sam Wormley, 22:35
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 22:17
Where's the F_cking giant butcher ?, Jeff…Relf, 22:10
Re: Educated professionals 2, Eric Gisse, 21:58
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 21:46
Properties of solutions, matt13601, 21:36
Re: Educated professionals 2, Greg Hansen, 21:06
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 20:49
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 20:05
Re: Quantization of thermal spectra from planets, Henning Makholm, 19:58
Re: I'm elated that WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein is locked up., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:32
Re: I'm elated that WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein is locked up., Jeff…Relf, 19:29
Re: Quantization of thermal spectra from planets, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 19:24
Re: I'm elated that WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein is locked up., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:13
Re: Quantization of thermal spectra from planets, Sorcerer, 18:45
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:43
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:40
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 18:34
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 18:30
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 18:29
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 18:29
Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Simple_DirectMedia_Layer., T Wake, 18:22
WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Simple_DirectMedia_Layer., Jeff…Relf, 18:20
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 18:20
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 18:18
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., T Wake, 18:18
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:14
Re: The pre-observable universe was once infinitely Hot/Dense/InterCausal., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:12
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., T Wake, 18:12
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:08
Re: The pre-observable universe was once infinitely Hot/Dense/InterCausal., T Wake, 18:08
Re: Quantization of thermal spectra from planets, mmeron, 18:07
Re: The pre-observable universe was once infinitely Hot/Dense/InterCausal., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:07
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., T Wake, 18:04
Re: Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:03
The pre-observable universe was once infinitely Hot/Dense/InterCausal., Jeff…Relf, 18:02
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:01
Re: Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., T Wake, 18:01
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., T Wake, 17:59
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 17:58
Re: real science, PD, 17:56
Re: Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:36
Re: real science, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:34
Re: Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., T Wake, 17:34
Re: Modeling 5D Temperature_Time_Space., T Wake, 17:33
Re: real science, JoeT, 17:32
Re: "Fusion never will be practical.", Jan Panteltje, 17:26
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, Sorcerer, 17:26
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 780 June 9, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe,Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sorcerer, 17:26
Re: Satellite in starry sky, Sorcerer, 17:26
Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly, tadchem, 17:23
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 9 Jun 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 17:20
"Fusion never will be practical.", FED UP, 17:18
Re: Modeling 5D Temperature_Time_Space., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:15
Re: Modeling 5D Temperature_Time_Space., Jeff…Relf, 17:10
Quantization of thermal spectra from planets, PD, 17:08
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 9 Jun 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 17:08
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:06
Re: Satellite in starry sky, Greg Neill, 17:05
Re: Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:05
Re: Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., T Wake, 17:01
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., T Wake, 17:00
Re: Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:59
Re: Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., T Wake, 16:57
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 16:56
Re: Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:48
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:46
Re: Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., T Wake, 16:46
Re: Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., T Wake, 16:46
Re: Solar Energy To Be Taxed, Ray Tomes, 16:45
Re: Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:43
Re: Satellite in starry sky, T Wake, 16:42
Re: Satellite in starry sky, jimp, 16:35
Creating a Direct_Draw surface for a particular character/color., Jeff…Relf, 16:30
Zarqawi did not die instantly, asdf, 16:10
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 780 June 9, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe,Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Uncle Al, 16:06
Re: Satellite in starry sky, Sam Wormley, 15:56
Re: Modeling 5D Temperature_Time_Space., Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:55
Re: Satellite in starry sky, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:53
Satellite in starry sky, neo, 15:46
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, fredifizzx, 15:18
Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein has been frozen by a root-level sysop., Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:14
Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein has been frozen by a root-level sysop., Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:02
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 14:38
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Jan Panteltje, 14:32
Re: Educated professionals 2, Herman Rubin, 14:31
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 14:30
Re: Breaking the Light Barrier, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:29
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:21
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Mike Combs, 14:00
Re: Educated professionals 2, T Wake, 14:00
Re: Educated professionals 2, Sorcerer, 13:56
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 13:56
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, PD, 13:50
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Jan Panteltje, 13:42
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, FrediFizzx, 13:37
Re: Why is deuterium-tritium fusion preferable to deuterium-deuterium fusion?, mmeron, 13:33
Re: Educated professionals 2, PD, 13:28
Re: Educated professionals 2, Sorcerer, 13:25
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Bob, 13:23
Re: Electron composition and electron division, Igor, 13:23
Re: (Pretty Version) Re: Rewrite of my assumptions Was: Mistakes (again), Zitterbewegung, 13:22
Shaking causes aftershocks, Sam Wormley, 13:13
Re: Educated professionals 2, PD, 13:10
Re: Why is deuterium-tritium fusion preferable to deuterium-deuterium fusion?, OG, 13:09
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 13:03
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sue..., 13:02
Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, Richard Saam, 13:01
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:57
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 12:56
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 12:55
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Jan Panteltje, 12:53
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phil Wheeler, 12:50
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Bob, 12:50
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:49
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 12:42
Re: Educated professionals 2, Sorcerer, 12:38
Re: What would I gain from running destop Linux ?, T Wake, 12:35
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 12:35
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phil Wheeler, 12:30
Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", uri, 12:14
Re: What would I gain from running destop Linux ?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:12
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 12:11
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 780 June 9, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Jan Panteltje, 12:06
Why is deuterium-tritium fusion preferable to deuterium-deuterium fusion?, Radium, 12:03
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:56
Re: My Favorite Laser, Radium, 11:55
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:53
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:49
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:48
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:43
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 11:41
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Bob, 11:41
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:39
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:38
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:37
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 11:35
Re: Educated professionals 2, Sam Wormley, 11:34
Re: Educated professionals 2, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:32
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:31
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:29
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:28
Educated professionals 2, Don1, 11:28
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:27
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:20
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 780 June 9, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 11:17
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Cruithne3753, 11:16
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:11
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:09
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Alex Terrell, 11:05
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:01
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 11:00
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 10:58
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 10:50
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 10:46
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 10:37
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 10:36
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 10:34
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sue..., 10:30
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 10:28
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 10:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 10:22
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 10:16
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 10:16
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sue..., 10:15
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 10:08
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 10:07
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 10:04
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 10:03
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sue..., 10:03
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 09:45
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, T Wake, 09:42
Re: I am an Athiest because you have no hope, Bob, 09:39
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 09:27
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, jon, 09:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:20
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 09:20
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:18
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:13
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:10
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:06
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:05
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 09:00
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, PD, 08:59
Re: I like T.J. proper, not his money., T Wake, 08:58
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 08:57
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension., T Wake, 08:54
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension., T Wake, 08:52
Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Jan Panteltje, 08:48
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension., T Wake, 08:46
Re: real science, PD, 08:46
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Jan Panteltje, 08:45
"The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Bew, 08:45
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 08:33
Re: Taming electron relativistic velocities, PD, 08:27
Re: speed of electricity, electro, 08:03
Solar Energy To Be Taxed, Rhodo Dendron, 07:51
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 07:39
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:24
Re: Feeding the trolls Was: What's next ?, Zitterbewegung, 07:06
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:03
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:02
Re: The start of the big bang..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:00
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 06:57
Electron composition and electron division, rim317-ava, 06:32
Re: Swing and momentum, CWatters, 06:24
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 06:08
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Marc, 05:58
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 05:57
Re: Electric Quadrupole, tadchem, 05:40
Re: real science, tadchem, 05:32
Graphical Error Analysis, D. Baruth, 05:03
Re: transiting weights on distorted equilibrium plane, dedanoe, 04:44
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 04:43
transiting weights on distorted equilibrium plane, dedanoe, 04:41
Re: effect of golf club on a ball, The Sorcerer, 04:21
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, The Sorcerer, 03:33
Re: Electric Quadrupole, abhishek_HBK, 03:05
Re: Taking human culture to universe., extropy1, 02:53
Re: I like T.J. proper, not his money., Jeff…Relf, 01:48
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, FrediFizzx, 01:39
Re: effect of golf club on a ball, john0714@xxxxxxx, 01:02
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Tim Bruening, 00:51
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Tim Bruening, 00:50
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Tim Bruening, 00:48
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, noshellswill, 00:36
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 00:19
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 00:09
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 00:01
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 00:00

June 08, 2006

Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 23:56
Re: Feeding the trolls Was: What's next ?, Archie Leach, 23:55
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 23:41
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 23:33
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 23:32
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 23:27
Feeding the trolls Was: What's next ?, Zitterbewegung, 23:20
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 23:16
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 23:14
Hydrinos and the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect, Jack Sarfatti, 23:08
Re: A Realistic Nuclear-powered 400nm laser, Eric Gisse, 22:53
Re: WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, lucasea, 22:52
Re: A Realistic Nuclear-powered 400nm laser, Radium, 22:42
Re: I am an Athiest because you have no hope, St Dog the Wet, 22:15
Re: Crank_Hater, which " Wiki articles on relativity " did you write ?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:10
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:58
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension., Eric Gisse, 21:53
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:52
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension., Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:49
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 21:46
The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension., Jeff…Relf, 21:45
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 21:45
Re: real science, JoeT, 21:35
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:30
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 21:23
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 21:08
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Jerry, 21:05
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 20:51
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:50
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 20:48
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 20:45
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 20:39
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:38
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:35
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 20:32
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 20:32
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 20:19
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 20:16
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 19:53
Re: Strong and weak nuclear forces, Rock Brentwood, 19:48
Re: Self studying classical mechanics, Rock Brentwood, 19:36
Re: Loop or string theory?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:27
Re: Loop or string theory?, Rock Brentwood, 19:24
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, Rock Brentwood, 19:15
Re: Neutron-antineutron vs. Proton-antiproton, Rock Brentwood, 19:13
Re: Antinuclear call to arms, Rock Brentwood, 19:09
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Rock Brentwood, 18:57
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, Rock Brentwood, 18:54
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 18:38
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:24
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 18:19
Re: SFT and Nuclear Physics, QncyMI, 18:16
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:14
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 18:13
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 18:10
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:09
Re: Taming electron relativistic velocities, srp, 18:09
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:08
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 17:58
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 17:54
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 17:33
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 17:31
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:28
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 17:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:25
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 17:24
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 17:23
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:22
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 17:21
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 17:19
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 17:19
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 17:16
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 17:15
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:14
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:13
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 17:11
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 17:10
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:07
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 17:05
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:59
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 16:56
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 16:53
Re: Impossible device at work?, The Sorcerer, 16:51
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:48
Re: counting, combinations, b integers with constant sum s, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 16:40
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 16:40
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 16:32
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 16:26
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 16:23
Re: Taking human culture to universe., firelock_ny, 16:17
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, PD, 15:54
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 15:38
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Eric Chomko, 15:36
Re: Good Science Magazines recommendations, riplin, 15:30
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:30
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 15:27
Re: speed of electricity, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:26
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 15:26
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, Mike, 15:25
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 15:25
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 15:23
Re: Electric Quadrupole, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:14
Electric Quadrupole, abhishek_HBK, 15:10
Re: speed of electricity, puppet_sock, 15:08
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, Traveler, 14:45
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 14:37
Re: speed of electricity, The Sorcerer, 14:18
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, PD, 14:09
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 232), carlip-nospam, 14:06
Re: real science, Igor, 13:57
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, FrediFizzx, 13:53
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, Traveler, 13:51
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, T Wake, 13:46
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:46
Mobile phone location based services, Hugh Pearce, 13:46
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:45
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 13:44
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:40
Re: speed of electricity, jambaugh, 13:30
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Immortalist, 13:23
counting, combinations, b integers with constant sum s, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 13:20
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, PD, 13:17
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, PD, 13:15
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., T Wake, 13:13
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Jan Panteltje, 13:13
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., PD, 13:12
Re: real science, T Wake, 13:09
Re: real science, T Wake, 13:08
Re: speed of electricity, Helmut Wabnig, 13:05
Re: Jeff's confusion, T Wake, 12:55
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 12:47
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, Mike, 12:33
Re: Swing and momentum, briggs, 12:31
Re: The observed universe, before it cooled to Planck temperture., T Wake, 12:29
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., T Wake, 12:28
Re: I like T.J. proper, not his money., T Wake, 12:21
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, srp, 12:20
Re: The cosmic inflation theory is worse than sci-fi., T Wake, 12:19
Re: WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, Pete C, 12:17
Re: The cosmic inflation theory is worse than sci-fi., T Wake, 12:17
Re: T_Wake will soon be gone., T Wake, 12:15
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 12:12
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 12:12
speed of electricity, Chrisd5000rouge, 12:09
Re: What's next ?, T Wake, 12:05
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, Traveler, 12:01
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, Traveler, 11:58
Re: Impossible device at work?, greysky, 11:52
Re: Taking human culture to universe., MarkA, 11:42
Re: Swing and momentum, CWatters, 11:34
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, Sam Wormley, 11:17
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, Sam Wormley, 11:08
Re: Taming electron relativistic velocities, PD, 11:04
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, p4o2, 11:04
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, PD, 11:02
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, puppet_sock, 11:00
Re: real science, PD, 10:59
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Roberts, 10:48
Re: All you [Hammond] detractors are the same Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, Otto Bahn, 10:35
Re: Fundamental composition of matter?, Sam Wormley, 10:34
Fundamental composition of matter?, rim317-ava, 10:18
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:15
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Bew, 09:48
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Mark K. Bilbo, 09:31
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:31
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 09:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 09:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 09:22
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 09:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 09:21
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 09:21
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 09:21
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:19
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:19
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:15
Re: Swing and momentum, CWatters, 09:12
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:06
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:03
Re: GPS idea, Richard Herring, 09:03
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Jan Panteltje, 09:03
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Mark K. Bilbo, 09:01
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Jan Panteltje, 09:00
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 08:59
Re: Impossible device at work?, Mike, 08:57
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 08:56
Re: GPS idea, Sam Wormley, 08:44
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, PD, 08:43
Re: real science, JoeT, 08:36
Re: GPS idea, Abstract Dissonance, 08:31
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 08:24
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 08:23
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 08:21
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 08:20
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 08:20
Re: GPS idea, Richard Herring, 08:18
Re: Impossible device at work?, srp, 08:03
Taming electron relativistic velocities, srp, 07:50
Impossible device at work?, RXguy, 07:42
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Joe Jakarta, 07:32
Re: new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, donstockbauer, 07:32
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Joe Jakarta, 07:29
Re: Taking human culture to universe., bombardmentforce, 07:25
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:22
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Joe Jakarta, 07:20
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Joe Jakarta, 07:12
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:08
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 07:04
Re: The observed universe, before it cooled to Planck temperture., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:59
Re: GPS idea, The Sorcerer, 06:58
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Ali Tavakoly, 06:57
Re: The observed universe, before it cooled to Planck temperture., CrankHater, 06:53
Re: The observed universe, before it cooled to Planck temperture., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:51
Re: The cosmic inflation theory is worse than sci-fi., Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:44
Re: Taking human culture to universe., SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim, 06:43
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:40
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:37
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:36
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:35
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:31
Re: Jeff's confusion, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:30
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 06:30
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:29
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 06:28
Re: Good Science Magazines recommendations, Mad Prof, 06:08
I like T.J. proper, not his money., Jeff…Relf, 06:04
Re: real science, tadchem, 05:56
The observed universe, before it cooled to Planck temperture., Jeff…Relf, 05:44
Re: T_Wake will soon be gone., CrankHater, 05:35
Re: The cosmic inflation theory is worse than sci-fi., CrankHater, 05:34
T_Wake will soon be gone., Jeff…Relf, 05:14
Re: blackbody spectra, David Macmanus, 05:04
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 05:02
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 04:55
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Richard Herring, 04:51
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Richard Herring, 04:49
What's next ?, Jeff…Relf, 04:30
Re: GPS idea, Abstract Dissonance, 04:30
Re: GPS idea, Abstract Dissonance, 04:28
Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is., CrankHater, 04:16
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Dave, 04:11
Re: The spacetime of our universe is flat, i.e. with no center of gravity., CrankHater, 04:11
Re: I'm worshiping Crank_Hater today, just because he's so good with words., CrankHater, 04:08
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 232), gregegan, 04:07
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, J. J. Lodder, 03:57
Re: GPS idea, The Sorcerer, 03:53
Re: effect of golf club on a ball, The Sorcerer, 03:41
GPS idea, Abstract Dissonance, 03:26
new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, yinbing-zhou, 03:13
The cosmic inflation theory is worse than sci-fi., Jeff…Relf, 02:55
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, The Sorcerer, 02:46
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Jerry, 02:31
Re: Cellular ether theory (large TeX), Ilja Schmelzer, 02:24
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 01:59
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:40
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 01:39
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ilja Schmelzer, 01:33
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:32
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:32
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:31
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:28
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:28
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:27
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:25
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:24
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:23
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 01:22
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, mmeron, 01:22
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 00:56
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 00:56
Re: All you [Hammond] detractors are the same Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, Dr. HotSalt, 00:50

June 07, 2006

Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Art Deco, 23:22
Re: Jeff's confusion, [H]omer, 23:15
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Greg Hansen, 23:08
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 23:07
Re: SFT and Nuclear Physics, QncyMI, 22:56
Re: A Realistic Nuclear-powered 400nm laser, jimp, 22:55
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 22:52
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 22:51
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Y.Porat, 22:50
Re: effect of golf club on a ball, Sam Wormley, 22:47
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 22:45
Re: Good Science Magazines recommendations, Sam Wormley, 22:43
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Mark K. Bilbo, 22:37
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Rand Simberg, 22:34
Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer II, Dan in Philly, 22:30
Re: A Realistic Nuclear-powered 400nm laser, Harry, 22:27
Re: effect of golf club on a ball, Harry, 22:25
real science, JoeT, 22:24
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Bombardier Planetary, 21:56
Good Science Magazines recommendations, asdf, 21:52
effect of golf club on a ball, john0714@xxxxxxx, 21:38
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Bill Hobba, 21:29
Re: Taking human culture to universe., AlanS, 21:28
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Bill Hobba, 21:22
(Pretty Version) Re: Rewrite of my assumptions Was: Mistakes (again), Zitterbewegung, 21:21
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., Bob Cain, 21:17
Re: A Realistic Nuclear-powered 400nm laser, Radium, 21:09
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., Eric Gisse, 20:52
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Edward Green, 20:44
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 20:41
Re: A Realistic Nuclear-powered 400nm laser, Eric Gisse, 20:27
Re: Source of dirt on the moon? (bootprint...), Llanzlan Klazmon, 20:23
Re: Simple Question (Not homework), Edward Green, 20:04
Re: A Realistic Nuclear-powered 400nm laser, Radium, 20:03
Re: physics, Edward Green, 19:42
Re: Jeff's confusion, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:22
Re: Jeff's confusion, T Wake, 19:20
Re: Jeff's confusion, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:19
Re: Jeff's confusion, T Wake, 19:18
Re: Jeff's confusion, Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:15
Re: Jeff's confusion, T Wake, 19:14
Re: The local anisotropies in the CMBR., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:03
Re: All you [Hammond] detractors are the same Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, Otto Bahn, 19:03
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 57: PI is Non-Hilbert Functional Analysis, Harry, 18:59
Re: The Jaffa vs. Jaffas., T Wake, 18:59
Re: The local anisotropies in the CMBR., T Wake, 18:58
The local anisotropies in the CMBR., Jeff…Relf, 18:54
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:51
Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 18:50
Re: The Jaffa vs. Jaffas., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:49
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, The Sorcerer, 18:49
Re: All you [Hammond] detractors are the same Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, T Wake, 18:45
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 18:43
Re: I blame Crank_Hater, my God., Mad Kow --Dave likes Asian, 18:41
Re: The numbers I used came from WikiPedia, NASA and SNLS., T Wake, 18:41
Re: T_Wake is an immature kid, a cheeky monkey., Eric Gisse, 18:39
Re: All you [Hammond] detractors are the same Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, TeaLady (Mari C.), 18:37
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Tom Roberts, 18:36
Re: A Realistic Nuclear-powered 400nm laser, Eric Gisse, 18:36
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:30
Re: The numbers I used came from WikiPedia, NASA and SNLS., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:29
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., T Wake, 18:28
The numbers I used came from WikiPedia, NASA and SNLS., Jeff…Relf, 18:27
Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, George Dishman, 18:17
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Frank Mayhar, 18:16
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tim, 18:12
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., Phineas T Puddleduck, 18:01
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., T Wake, 17:59
Re: Rewrite of my assumptions Was: Mistakes (again), tadchem, 17:58
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:53
Re: General_Relativity's Lambda scalar., T Wake, 17:52
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, srp, 17:52
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, tadchem, 17:52
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., T Wake, 17:48
Re: General_Relativity's Lambda scalar., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:36
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, St. John Smythe, 17:34
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:34
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 17:32
General_Relativity's Lambda scalar., Jeff…Relf, 17:29
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 17:25
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 17:18
Re: A Realistic Nuclear-powered 400nm laser, Radium, 17:18
--(*)-(*)-- // NEED a LEATHER Halter Top? -------------------------------------------------------, Kirk Gregory Czuhai, 17:18
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 17:10
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, PD, 17:07
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., T Wake, 17:05
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, T Wake, 17:04
Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 17:03
Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is., T Wake, 17:00
Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory., Jeff…Relf, 16:59
Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, Richard Saam, 16:55
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 16:47
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 16:46
Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 16:42
Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is., Jeff…Relf, 16:38
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?, John C . Polasek, 16:35
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 57: PI is Non-Hilbert Functional Analysis, Dave, 16:30
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, The Sorcerer, 16:22
Re: WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, The Sorcerer, 15:58
Re: Swing and momentum, Henning Makholm, 15:54
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Dave, 15:54
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Dave, 15:51
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 57: PI is Non-Hilbert Functional Analysis, Dave, 15:47
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 57: PI is Non-Hilbert Functional Analysis, Dave, 15:42
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Mike, 15:37
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 15:33
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Dave, 15:31
Re: blackbody spectra, Dave, 15:10
Re: blackbody spectra, Andy Resnick, 15:07
Re: Taking human culture to universe., leo, 15:04
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?, hetware, 15:04
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Uncle Vic, 14:51
Re: WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, Ron Jones, 14:51
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:50
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 14:47
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:41
Re: Taking human culture to universe., leo, 14:39
Re: Taking human culture to universe., kathryn, 14:37
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, PD, 14:32
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Daniel T., 14:26
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?, hetware, 14:24
Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?, The Sorcerer, 14:21
Re: A Realistic Nuclear-powered 400nm laser, Eric Gisse, 14:19
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 14:17
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 14:14
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:08
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Sir Frederick, 14:06
Re: Taking human culture to universe., firelock_ny, 14:04
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, PD, 14:03
Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is., T Wake, 14:02
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?, The Sorcerer, 14:01
Re: Taking human culture to universe., firelock_ny, 14:00
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, Hero, 13:52
Re: Taking human culture to universe., Immortalist, 13:52
Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?, Ken S. Tucker, 13:48
Taking human culture to universe., neo, 13:45
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Ali Tavakoly, 13:44
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?, Ken S. Tucker, 13:44
Re: Cellular ether theory (large TeX), FrediFizzx, 13:39
Re: WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, Guy King, 13:36
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Ken S. Tucker, 13:35
Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?, The Sorcerer, 13:35
Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?, The Sorcerer, 13:35
wondering how dedanoe got those numbers?, dedanoe, 13:25
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, PD, 13:20
Re: WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, Greg Hansen, 12:49
Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?, hetware, 12:48
A Realistic Nuclear-powered 400nm laser, Radium, 12:40
Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan, Hansi, 12:36
blackbody spectra, David Macmanus, 12:31
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Greg Hansen, 12:28
Re: WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, Grumps, 12:26
Re: WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, Christian McArdle, 12:20
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 12:18
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 12:13
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:55
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:52
WD40 or 3-in-one: which is better, Andrei Semyon, 11:49
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:45
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?, John C . Polasek, 11:38
Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?, Matthew Lybanon, 11:37
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:36
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:30
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:24
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, John C . Polasek, 11:18
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:18
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:17
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:09
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:02
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:02
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Richard Herring, 11:01
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:01
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:00
Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?, John C . Polasek, 10:52
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, PD, 10:49
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 10:44
Re: Swing and momentum, Richard Herring, 10:43
Re: Geomagnetism geometry question, jason, 10:39
Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?, hetware, 10:37
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 10:35
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 57: PI is Non-Hilbert Functional Analysis, Harry, 10:16
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?, hetware, 10:16
"The Nature of Mass", Bew, 10:15
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, bz, 10:05
Re: Swing and momentum, Henning Makholm, 10:04
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Kadaitcha Man, 10:00
Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?, The Sorcerer, 09:58
Re: Cellular ether theory (large TeX), Ilja Schmelzer, 09:56
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:52
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:48
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:41
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:39
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:37
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Kadaitcha Man, 09:36
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:25
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:17
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, Andy Resnick, 09:13
Re: Swing and momentum, jmfbahciv, 09:10
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:06
Re: Swing and momentum, jmfbahciv, 09:01
Re: My Favorite Laser, jmfbahciv, 08:58
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Kadaitcha Man, 08:58
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 08:57
Re: Antinuclear call to arms, jmfbahciv, 08:54
Re: Source of dirt on the moon? (bootprint...), mfunke, 08:54
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 08:50
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:42
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Kadaitcha Man, 08:40
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 08:35
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:33
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Sam Wormley, 08:32
Re: Magnetic field strength in water, Richard Herring, 08:31
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 08:28
Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?, hetware, 08:26
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:23
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 08:17
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Kadaitcha Man, 08:17
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 08:08
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Kadaitcha Man, 08:06
Re: Simple Question (Not homework), The Sorcerer, 08:03
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:49
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:28
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 07:17
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:16
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, srp, 06:56
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, donstockbauer, 06:54
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 06:53
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 06:49
Re: Rewrite of my assumptions Was: Mistakes (again), Zitterbewegung, 06:48
Re: Rewrite of my assumptions Was: Mistakes (again), Zitterbewegung, 06:48
Re: Simple Question (Not homework), abu, 06:46
Re: Asteroid to strike India in 2036, Rene Tschaggelar, 06:42
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, PD, 06:41
Re: Rewrite of my assumptions Was: Mistakes (again), Darth Vader, 06:39
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bilge, 05:59
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, tadchem, 05:57
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, The Sorcerer, 05:55
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, electro, 05:51
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 05:50
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 05:45
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 05:41
Re: The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Phineas T Puddleduck, 05:34
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, tdp1001, 05:33
Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is., CrankHater, 05:31
The Imperious Demands of Quantum Mechanics, Joe Jakarta, 05:28
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 05:26
Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 05:24
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tim, 04:50
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Koobee Wublee, 03:39
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 57: PI is Non-Hilbert Functional Analysis, OsherD, 03:29
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bob Cain, 03:17
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 57: PI is Non-Hilbert Functional Analysis, OsherD, 03:06
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 57: PI is Non-Hilbert Functional Analysis, OsherD, 02:50
The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is., Jeff…Relf, 02:43
Quantum Mechanics: established fact?, Martha, 01:57
Re: Geomagnetism geometry question, Elvis Presley, 01:48
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, mmeron, 01:10

June 06, 2006

Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 23:53
Rewrite of my assumptions Was: Mistakes (again), Zitterbewegung, 23:50
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 23:48
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Edward Green, 23:39
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 23:28
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 23:12
Re: Simple Question (Not homework), Edward Green, 23:07
Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, Matthew L. Martin, 22:45
Re: Need help with Gold dissolved in sea water, ralph, 22:41
Re: Neutron-antineutron vs. Proton-antiproton, mmeron, 22:25
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 21:38
Re: Neutron-antineutron vs. Proton-antiproton, Radium, 21:35
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, John C . Polasek, 21:35
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, OG, 21:06
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:42
Re: Neutron-antineutron vs. Proton-antiproton, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:41
Approximately how high of a temperature is required to generated an antineutron, Radium, 20:31
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, carlip-nospam, 20:29
Re: Neutron-antineutron vs. Proton-antiproton, Radium, 20:28
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, Radium, 20:25
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, OG, 20:14
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 20:03
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, John C . Polasek, 19:45
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, srp, 19:18
The strong force bettween ball particles, NILS B�RJESSON, 19:04
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, Radium, 18:57
Re: God is fair, Kadaitcha Man, 18:53
Re: When Galaxies Collide (best they both be regular matter), Sam Wormley, 18:25
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, Henning Makholm, 17:40
Re: Swing and momentum, Timo A. Nieminen, 17:35
Re: I'm going to give her a good dicking., T Wake, 17:30
Re: Herb Glazier might be T.J. Frazir's alter-ego., T Wake, 17:29
Re: I'm worshiping Crank_Hater today, just because he's so good with words., T Wake, 17:26
Re: Swing and momentum, Timo A. Nieminen, 17:24
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, srp, 17:21
Re: When Galaxies Collide (best they both be regular matter), Henning Makholm, 17:18
Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 17:14
Re: I blame Crank_Hater, my God., Zitterbewegung, 17:12
Mistakes (again), Zitterbewegung, 17:11
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, mmeron, 17:11
Herb Glazier might be T.J. Frazir's alter-ego., Jeff…Relf, 17:09
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Ray Tomes, 17:08
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, PD, 16:59
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, electro, 16:54
I'm going to give her a good dicking., Jeff…Relf, 16:24
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Jerry, 16:18
Re: Newbee question, Warum Things fall the downward, not the upward?, Mike, 16:17
I'm worshiping Crank_Hater today, just because he's so good with words., Jeff…Relf, 16:17
Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:14
Re: When Galaxies Collide (best they both be regular matter), Sam Wormley, 16:10
Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, top9, 16:04
Re: When Galaxies Collide (best they both be regular matter), Sam Wormley, 15:59
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:54
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:51
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Mike, 15:50
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Mike, 15:48
Re: So how would you falsify it?, Robert Grumbine, 15:45
Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:41
Re: All you [Hammond] detractors are the same Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, Adam Funk, 15:41
Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, top9, 15:35
Re: Newbee question, Warum Things fall the downward, not the upward?, Henning Makholm, 15:13
Re: Educated professionals, The Sorcerer, 15:06
Re: When Galaxies Collide (best they both be regular matter), Henning Makholm, 15:05
Magnetic field strength in water, paul, 15:04
Re: Swing and momentum, Henning Makholm, 15:04
Re: Swing and momentum, CWatters, 14:45
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, PD, 14:39
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, carlip-nospam, 14:38
Rewrite (Accidentally used reply)., Zitterbewegung, 14:34
Re: Newbee question, Warum Things fall the downward, not the upward?, PD, 14:34
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Henning Makholm, 14:31
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, PD, 14:28
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, Henning Makholm, 14:25
Re: Educated professionals, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:19
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:13
Re: Neutron-antineutron vs. Proton-antiproton, mmeron, 13:52
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, Sam Wormley, 13:48
Re: Neutron-antineutron vs. Proton-antiproton, Sam Wormley, 13:48
Re: Neutron-antineutron vs. Proton-antiproton, Radium, 13:38
Re: Electron vibration and Photons, mmeron, 13:32
Re: Neutron-antineutron vs. Proton-antiproton, Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:30
Neutron-antineutron vs. Proton-antiproton, Radium, 13:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:39
Re: curses, Igor, 12:38
spiral geometric reduction by dedanoe, dedanoe, 12:36
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 12:33
Re: geometric reduction, dedanoe, 12:31
Re: God is fair, donstockbauer, 12:30
Re: T.J., T Wake, 12:23
Re: God is fair, T Wake, 12:20
Re: God is fair, T Wake, 12:19
Re: God is fair, T Wake, 12:18
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 12:18
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 12:16
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:06
Re: Antinuclear call to arms, Sam Wormley, 12:04
Re: Newbee question, Warum Things fall the downward, not the upward?, Jan Panteltje, 12:03
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 12:03
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 12:01
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 12:00
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T Puddleduck, 11:59
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:59
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:58
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:53
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:52
Re: Newbee question, Warum Things fall the downward, not the upward?, Sam Wormley, 11:50
Re: FRAUDULENT "SPOG FREAK" POSTS, Robert Weldon, 11:47
Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?, The Sorcerer, 11:45
Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?, hetware, 11:25
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 11:22
Re: I blame Crank_Hater, my God., Howard, 11:15
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:14
God is fair, kurtstocklmeir, 11:14
God is fair, kurtstocklmeir, 11:11
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:11
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:10
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:10
God is fair, kurtstocklmeir, 11:09
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 11:05
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 10:54
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, SamSez, 10:37
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 10:37
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 10:33
Re: Why is space observed to be geometrically flat?, Zitterbewegung, 10:24
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:20
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Paul B. Andersen, 10:17
"Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Bew, 10:01
Re: Physics is dead!, Paul B. Andersen, 09:53
Re: Why is space observed to be geometrically flat?, Zitterbewegung, 09:50
Re: Why is space observed to be geometrically flat?, Zitterbewegung, 09:39
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 09:36
Newbee question, Warum Things fall the downward, not the upward?, Ollie Fant Newbee, 09:32
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:24
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 09:17
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Mike, 09:04
Re: FRAUDULENT "SPOG FREAK" POSTS, Android Cat, 08:58
Re: Swing and momentum, jmfbahciv, 08:57
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 08:55
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 08:54
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 08:49
Re: FRAUDULENT "SPOG FREAK" POSTS, barbara, 08:41
Re: Antinuclear call to arms, jmfbahciv, 08:38
Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, barbara, 08:38
Re: How spin/phase effects interference patterns., T Wake, 08:19
Re: If you consider the observable universe as a single unit of 4D spacetime..., T Wake, 08:18
Re: T_Wake, I suggest you bone up a bit on GR., T Wake, 08:17
Re: T_PuddleDuck's can't model anything... I can do it fine., T Wake, 08:09
Re: Making the word dick a verb is not unlike making the word Google a verb., T Wake, 08:09
Re: I blame Crank_Hater, my God., T Wake, 08:07
Re: SFT and Nuclear Physics, Dr Photon, 08:03
Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, srp, 07:54
Re: Sub-atomic particles and spin, John Bailey, 07:50
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, srp, 07:49
Re: Simple Question (Not homework), abu, 07:23
Re: [OT] Stamp values and postal prices - rather puzzling, CWatters, 07:19
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, Richard Tobin, 06:54
Re: Geomagnetism geometry question, Richard Herring, 06:41
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 06:39
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 06:25
Re: Gas Laws question, Tim Alfred, 05:54
Re: Sell chemestry supplies, then go to jail, Jan Panteltje, 05:54
Re: Sell chemestry supplies, then go to jail, tadchem, 05:35
Re: Usenet first became fast back in 1991., jmfbahciv, 05:27
Re: My Favorite Laser, jmfbahciv, 05:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 05:03
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 04:58
I blame Crank_Hater, my God., Jeff…Relf, 04:58
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 04:51
Re: Defining a circle, The Sorcerer, 04:40
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 04:39
Re: T_Wake is an immature kid, a cheeky monkey., CrankHater, 04:18
Re: THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE, CrankHater, 04:09
Re: FRAUDULENT "SPOG FREAK" POSTS, CrankHater, 04:00
Re: Making the word dick a verb is not unlike making the word Google a verb., CrankHater, 03:57
Re: All you [Hammond] detractors are the same Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, CrankHater, 03:54
Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, CrankHater, 03:50
Making the word dick a verb is not unlike making the word Google a verb., Jeff…Relf, 03:20
Re: Dicking == F_cking., T Wake, 03:10
Re: T_Wake has no idea what does or does not contradict experimental evidence., T Wake, 03:10
Re: Usenet first became fast back in 1991., T Wake, 03:04
Re: T_Wake is an immature kid, a cheeky monkey., T Wake, 03:04
T_PuddleDuck's can't model anything... I can do it fine., Jeff…Relf, 03:03
T_Wake, I suggest you bone up a bit on GR., Jeff…Relf, 02:56
Re: Where did the big bang happen., Bob Cain, 02:52
Electrons are modeled as dimensionless points and the 1/2 spin has no units., Jeff…Relf, 02:46
Re: T_Wake is an immature kid, a cheeky monkey., Howard, 01:32
T_Wake is an immature kid, a cheeky monkey., Jeff…Relf, 01:14
Re: How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, Sam Wormley, 01:14
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?, Ken S. Tucker, 01:11
Dicking == F_cking., Jeff…Relf, 00:55
How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?, Uno Lapideus, 00:52
T_Wake has no idea what does or does not contradict experimental evidence., Jeff…Relf, 00:46
Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 00:31
Re: Educated professionals, mmeron, 00:11
THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE, switzerland qunatium computer, 00:06
If you consider the observable universe as a single unit of 4D spacetime..., Jeff…Relf, 00:05
FRAUDULENT "SPOG FREAK" POSTS, TMG, 00:01

June 05, 2006

Usenet first became fast back in 1991., Jeff…Relf, 23:49
Re: Educated professionals, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:07
How does the spectra of anitmatter differ from matter ?, Jeff…Relf, 23:02
The lack of Brits at ESA.INT., Jeff…Relf, 22:40
How spin/phase effects interference patterns., Jeff…Relf, 22:31
Re: Questions about nuclear fusion and elements made of anti-particles, mmeron, 22:25
Re: Questions about nuclear fusion and elements made of anti-particles, mmeron, 22:23
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, mmeron, 22:21
Re: Educated professionals, The World Wide Wade, 22:11
Re: Educated professionals, Reef Fish, 22:06
Re: My Favorite Laser, Greg Hansen, 22:06
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Roberts, 22:05
Re: Questions about nuclear fusion and elements made of anti-particles, jimp, 22:05
The spacetime of our universe is flat, i.e. with no center of gravity., Jeff…Relf, 22:03
derive this formula, bgold, 21:52
Re: My Favorite Laser, Radium, 21:51
Re: Educated professionals, David Moran, 21:35
Re: Educated professionals, David Moran, 21:33
Re: Defining a circle, hetware, 21:22
Re: Educated professionals, The Sorcerer, 21:21
Re: Educated professionals, Someonekicked, 21:03
Re: Continuous space and time, Charlie, 20:54
Re: When Galaxies Collide (best they both be regular matter), Sam Wormley, 20:48
Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 20:46
Re: Where did the big bang happen., Sam Wormley, 20:46
Re: Educated professionals, N. Silver, 20:41
Re: Sub-atomic particles and spin, Sam Wormley, 20:40
Re: Educated professionals, Phil Holman, 20:37
Re: How Fast Can Angels Fly, Elvis Presley, 20:36
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 20:34
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 20:30
Re: Educated professionals, Sam Wormley, 20:28
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, carlip-nospam, 20:17
Re: Sub-atomic particles and spin, Sam Wormley, 20:13
Educated professionals, Don1, 20:13
Re: My Favorite Laser, Greg Hansen, 20:13
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 20:06
Re: Questions about nuclear fusion and elements made of anti-particles, Radium, 20:03
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 20:01
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Tom Potter, 19:54
Re: Continuous space and time, Henning Makholm, 19:47
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?, John C . Polasek, 19:38
Continuous space and time, Charlie, 19:11
Re: Negative Analog of Proton?, Richard Tobin, 19:08
Questions about nuclear fusion and elements made of anti-particles, Radium, 19:07
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, The Sorcerer, 18:56
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Henning Makholm, 18:53
Re: Please help a newbie..., dda1, 18:44
Re: All you [Hammond] detractors are the same Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, T Wake, 18:25
Re: Sub-atomic particles and spin, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:08
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sue..., 18:06
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 18:00
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 17:59
Re: If you take the observable cosmos as a single unit of spacetime..., T Wake, 17:59
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 17:58
Re: This age-old postulate is more fruitful than the theory of evolution., T Wake, 17:55
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 17:55
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 17:55
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 17:52
Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, Richard Saam, 17:52
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 17:51
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 17:50
Re: Sub-atomic particles and spin, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:48
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 17:47
Re: Where did the big bang happen., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:44
Re: Please help a newbie..., Bhanwara, 17:42
Re: When Galaxies Collide (best they both be regular matter), G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:38
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Jerry, 17:37
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, The Sorcerer, 17:31
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 17:31
Re: Please help a newbie..., Himme Milo, 17:24
Re: If you take the observable cosmos as a single unit of spacetime..., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 17:15
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 16:57
Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS, Kevin S . Wilson, 16:52
QV/2 exactly half input energy QV?, hetware, 16:46
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 16:44
If you take the observable cosmos as a single unit of spacetime..., Jeff…Relf, 16:42
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 16:40
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 16:39
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 16:36
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sue..., 16:34
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 16:32
This age-old postulate is more fruitful than the theory of evolution., Jeff…Relf, 16:26
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Robert Boucher, 16:19
Re: Please help a newbie..., brian a m stuckless, 16:02
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 15:47
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 15:21
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 15:16
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, carlip-nospam, 15:15
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 15:12
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 15:07
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 14:56
Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity", Igor, 14:50
Re: the principles of lust (enigma), Igor, 14:47
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 14:45
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:44
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 14:26
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 14:13
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 14:03
Re: My Favorite Laser, Radium, 13:53
Andromeda Adrift in Sea of Dust in New NASA Image, Sam Wormley, 13:42
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 13:30
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 13:28
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, The Sorcerer, 13:26
Re: My Favorite Laser, Greg Hansen, 13:20
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 13:16
Re: [OT] Tom, Dick and Jane (Was Re: Like a retarded ...), T Wake, 13:16
Re: Entropy consumes gravity. Many fear Einstein more than Darwin., T Wake, 13:14
Re: My Favorite Laser, Greg Hansen, 13:13
Re: Entropy consumes gravity. Many fear Einstein more than Darwin., T Wake, 13:10
"Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Bew, 13:07
Re: Testing Special Relativity and Newtonian Gravity, Mike, 13:06
Re: Testing Special Relativity and Newtonian Gravity, Mike, 13:03
Re: Why is space observed to be geometrically flat?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 13:00
Re: Please help a newbie..., T Wake, 12:59
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sue..., 12:54
Re: Testing Special Relativity and Newtonian Gravity, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:41
Re: My Favorite Laser, Greg Hansen, 12:40
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 12:38
Re: Why is space observed to be geometrically flat?, Mike, 12:36
Re: Why is space observed to be geometrically flat?, Mike, 12:35
Re: Please help a newbie..., Eric Gisse, 12:32
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 12:32
Re: Testing Special Relativity and Newtonian Gravity, Mike, 12:25
Re: Like a retarded preschooler, all T_Wake can do is harangue me here., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 12:23
Re: Why is space observed to be geometrically flat?, boson boss, 12:22
Re: [OT] Tom, Dick and Jane (Was Re: Like a retarded ...), Phineas T PuddleDuck, 12:22
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 12:21
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Eric Gisse, 12:18
[OT] Tom, Dick and Jane (Was Re: Like a retarded ...), T Wake, 12:16
Re: Like a retarded preschooler, all T_Wake can do is harangue me here., T Wake, 12:14
Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, George Dishman, 12:14
Re: A lot of people didn't like Darwin's ideas either., T Wake, 12:09
Re: The U.S. has the Apollo moon landings, GlobalStar, Iridium..., T Wake, 12:04
Testing Special Relativity and Newtonian Gravity, Sam Wormley, 12:04
Re: Physics: Thinking Back and Forward, Phil Wheeler, 11:52
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, mmeron, 11:51
Physics: Thinking Back and Forward, Sam Wormley, 11:45
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Randy M. Dumse, 11:41
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:37
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 11:34
Re: Swing and momentum, briggs, 11:28
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, dda1, 11:10
Re: apollo proof of hoax, bz, 11:07
Re: My Favorite Laser, nightlight, 11:05
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Bhanwara, 11:03
Re: Negative Analog of Proton?, Josef Matz, 11:03
Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will, Sam Wormley, 10:54
Re: Mind and Reality in science, MobyDikc, 10:46
Re: Please help a newbie..., Bhanwara, 10:44
Re: Schrodinger's Equation, mitch, 10:44
Re: Please help a newbie..., Bhanwara, 10:40
Re: Sell chemestry supplies, then go to jail, beav, 10:32
Re: Please help a newbie..., Eric Gisse, 10:27
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 10:26
Re: Please help a newbie..., dda1, 10:23
Re: Please help a newbie..., Bhanwara, 10:12
Re: Swing and momentum, Henning Makholm, 10:07
Re: Please help a newbie..., Eric Gisse, 10:05
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Henning Makholm, 09:56
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, Radium, 09:53
Re: Please help a newbie..., Bhanwara, 09:36
Re: Antinuclear call to arms, Sam Wormley, 09:31
Re: Entropy consumes gravity. Many fear Einstein more than Darwin., Eric Gisse, 09:21
Re: Please help a newbie..., Eric Gisse, 09:11
Re: Schrodinger's Equation, Eric Gisse, 08:56
Re: geometric reduction, Eric Gisse, 08:56
Re: My Favorite Laser, Sam Wormley, 08:54
Re: The U.S. has the Apollo moon landings, GlobalStar, Iridium..., Eric Gisse, 08:45
Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, Richard Saam, 08:45
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 08:44
Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Andy Resnick, 08:39
Re: My Favorite Laser, Sam Wormley, 08:14
Re: fission stars?, bz, 08:13
Re: Swing and momentum, John Bailey, 08:13
Re: Antinuclear call to arms, jmfbahciv, 07:56
Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?, Tom Potter, 07:43
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 07:35
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 07:34
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 07:32
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 07:27
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 07:24
Re: Mathematical Proof of non-Galilean Time given Constant Lightspeed, The Sorcerer, 07:12
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, Bruce Scott TOK, 06:52
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 05, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 06:34
Re: Swing and momentum, BernardZ, 06:34
Re: The U.S. has the Apollo moon landings, GlobalStar, Iridium..., Ken Oath, 06:06
Re: fission stars?, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:50
Re: Where did the big bang happen., The Sorcerer, 05:46
Re: Schrodinger's Equation, Timo A. Nieminen, 05:34
the principles of lust (enigma), dedanoe, 05:31
Re: Greek letters., Timo A. Nieminen, 05:29
Re: Fibonacci's Missing Flowers, tadchem, 05:17
Re: Schrodinger's Equation, mitch, 05:14
geometric reduction, dedanoe, 05:03
Re: Schrodinger's Equation, mmeron, 05:02
Re: The U.S. has the Apollo moon landings, GlobalStar, Iridium..., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 05:01
Re: Nature is just repetitive like that sometimes., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 05:00
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Kadaitcha Man, 04:59
Re: A lot of people didn't like Darwin's ideas either., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 04:59
Re: Like a retarded preschooler, all T_Wake can do is harangue me here., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 04:57
Schrodinger's Equation, mitch, 04:56
Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Richard Herring, 04:53
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 04:51
Re: Entropy consumes gravity. Many fear Einstein more than Darwin., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 04:44
Re: Fibonacci's Missing Flowers, Robert Israel, 04:44
Re: The U.S. has the Apollo moon landings, GlobalStar, Iridium..., Roy L . Fuchs, 03:08

June 04, 2006

Re: My Favorite Laser, Radium, 15:14
Re: My Favorite Laser, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: Mathematical Proof of non-Galilean Time given Constant Lightspeed, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: physics, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: hbar=1, charge and other quantities in diminsions of length and time., The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: Correct way to write 24 hour-time? Decimalpoint too., The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: My Favorite Laser, mmeron, 14:58
Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, mmeron, 14:55
Re: My Favorite Laser, mmeron, 14:53
Re: Lazy Invariance Question, mmeron, 14:51
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 14:50
Re: How much energy does radium produce?, mmeron, 14:40
Re: Defining a circle, hetware, 14:35
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 13:30
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 13:29
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Eric Gisse, 13:26
Re: My Favorite Laser, Radium, 13:26
Re: Where did the big bang happen., The Sorcerer, 13:23
Re: My Favorite Laser, Radium, 13:20
Re: My Favorite Laser, jimp, 13:15
Re: My Favorite Laser, jimp, 13:15
Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 13:14
Re: Sub-atomic particles and spin, Edward Green, 12:57
Re: My Favorite Laser, Radium, 12:49
Re: Sub-atomic particles and spin, Edward Green, 12:47
Re: My Favorite Laser, Radium, 12:45
Re: Swing and momentum, Edward Green, 12:39
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Golden Boar, 12:37
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 12:36
Re: physics, T Wake, 12:34
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 12:31
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 12:31
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 12:31
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?, John C . Polasek, 12:28
Re: Simple Question (Not homework), Edward Green, 12:27
Lazy Invariance Question, Edward Green, 12:25
Re: My Favorite Laser, jimp, 12:25
Re: My Favorite Laser, jimp, 12:25
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 12:21
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Golden Boar, 12:14
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 12:12
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 12:08
Re: My Favorite Laser, Radium, 12:06
Re: Why is space observed to be geometrically flat?, boson boss, 12:04
Re: My Favorite Laser, Radium, 11:57
Re: Where did the big bang happen., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 11:56
Re: Simple Question (Not homework), Phineas T PuddleDuck, 11:54
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 11:53
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Golden Boar, 11:52
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Golden Boar, 11:49
Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), hetware, 11:47
Re: physics, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 11:46
Re: Where did the big bang happen., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 11:45
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 11:44
Re: Simple Question (Not homework), Edward Green, 11:43
Re: My Favorite Laser, Greg Hansen, 11:42
Re: Where did the big bang happen., clemenr, 11:41
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 11:41
physics, Lisa Goose, 11:37
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 11:36
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 11:35
Re: My Favorite Laser, Greg Hansen, 11:34
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 11:33
On the Physical -- Was: Understanding the Action Integral, Edward Green, 11:32
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 11:30
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 11:30
Re: My Favorite Laser, Greg Hansen, 11:24
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 11:23
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 11:19
Re: My Favorite Laser, jimp, 11:15
Re: My Favorite Laser, T Wake, 11:12
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 11:03
Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 11:01
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 11:01
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Golden Boar, 11:01
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 10:59
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 10:58
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 10:56
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Golden Boar, 10:55
Re: EMRP Gravity Theory, Aetherist, 10:53
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 10:51
"Corrections to Special Relativity", Klim, 10:45
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Golden Boar, 10:33
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Golden Boar, 10:30
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 10:30
Re: My Favorite Laser, Radium, 10:28
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Golden Boar, 10:28
Re: My Favorite Laser, Radium, 10:28
Re: Correct way to write 24 hour-time? Decimalpoint too., The Sorcerer, 10:26
Re: My Favorite Laser, Sam Wormley, 10:25
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 10:08
Re: Defining a circle, The Sorcerer, 09:59
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:57
Re: Swing and momentum, Henning Makholm, 09:56
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:56
Re: Why is space observed to be geometrically flat?, boson boss, 09:55
curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:55
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 09:55
Re: Sub-atomic particles and spin, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 09:50
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 09:48
Re: Swing and momentum, Mike, 09:39
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 09:38
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 09:33
Re: My Favorite Laser, Sam Wormley, 09:20
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 08:54
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Golden Boar, 08:39
Re: My Favorite Laser, jmfbahciv, 08:37
Re: Swing and momentum, CWatters, 08:30
Re: Where did the big bang happen., CWatters, 08:26
Re: My Favorite Laser, Jan Panteltje, 07:31
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 07:22
Re: On scientific publishing, srp, 07:06
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 06:53
Re: You can't model the cosmos using just four dimensions., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 06:40
Re: Swing and momentum, Henning Makholm, 06:36
Re: You can't model the cosmos using just four dimensions., Phineas T PuddleDuck, 06:32
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Phineas T PuddleDuck, 06:28
Re: All electrons were probably created at the same time., T Wake, 06:20
Re: You can't model the cosmos using just four dimensions., T Wake, 06:04
Re: How much energy does radium produce?, jmfbahciv, 05:55
Re: fission stars?, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:21
Re: Swing and momentum, Martin Hogbin, 03:38
Re: Please help a newbie..., tdp1001, 03:26
All electrons were probably created at the same time., Jeff…Relf, 03:20
Re: Please help a newbie..., tdp1001, 03:14
Swing and momentum, BernardZ, 02:51
Re: How much energy does radium produce?, mmeron, 02:46
Re: How much energy does radium produce?, Protoman, 02:40
Re: Sub-atomic particles and spin, Glenn Møller-Holst, 02:22
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Roy L . Fuchs, 02:17
Re: How much energy does radium produce?, mmeron, 02:08
>>>>>>Matrix Computing to Infinite Universes<<<<<<<<, switzerland qunatium computer, 01:24
>>>>>>Matrix Computing to Infinite Universes<<<<<<<<, switzerland qunatium computer, 01:24
>>>>>>Matrix Computing to Infinte Universes<<<<<<<<, switzerland qunatium computer, 01:21
Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Brad Guth, 01:03
Re: Sub-atomic particles and spin, donstockbauer, 00:32