sci.physics (thread)

"The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Klim, 2006/05/29
A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, Waxo, 2006/05/29
- Re: A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, jimp, 2006/05/29
- Re: A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, tadchem, 2006/05/29
- Re: A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, DaveG, 2006/05/29
- Re: A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, Bart van der Wolf, 2006/05/30
Re: Writers 8,600 years ago in China., Lawson English, 2006/05/29
ED CONRAD POST IRKS INTERNET COMMISSION, Ed Conrad, 2006/05/29
I did not find Salam's article, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 2006/05/29
- Re: I did not find Salam's article, puppet_sock, 2006/05/29
- Re: I did not find Salam's article, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/29
Questions about nanocrystals, lethal, 2006/05/29
- Re: Questions about nanocrystals, Glenn Møller-Holst, 2006/05/29
Sylvester's Inertia, Sensei, 2006/05/29
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 2006/05/29
- Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 2006/05/29
- Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 2006/05/29
  - Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 2006/05/29
Collaborative wiki - Physicists needed, david, 2006/05/29
Talk of proton smashing at Duke, Mike Jr., 2006/05/29
Lisa Randall interview, Mike Jr., 2006/05/29
- Re: Lisa Randall interview, greysky, 2006/05/30
- Re: Lisa Randall interview, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/30
Wave Particle Duality; FYI, Mike Jr., 2006/05/29
Frame of reference!!!, ALFAISAL, 2006/05/29
- Re: Frame of reference!!!, Cleverbum, 2006/05/29
  - Re: Frame of reference!!!, donstockbauer, 2006/05/29
- Re: Frame of reference!!!, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/29
interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Cleverbum, 2006/05/29
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, srp, 2006/05/29
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/29
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/29
  - Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, srp, 2006/05/29
    - Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, srp, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, srp, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, srp, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/29
  - Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Cleverbum, 2006/05/30
    - Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Greg Neill, 2006/05/30
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 29, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2006/05/29
Feynman II-19-11: typo?, hetware, 2006/05/28
- Re: Feynman II-19-11: typo?, fjolsvit, 2006/05/28
  - Re: Feynman II-19-11: typo?, hetware, 2006/05/28
- Re: Feynman II-19-11: typo?, Jim Black, 2006/05/28
  - Re: Feynman II-19-11: typo?, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/28
Re: What Evolution Really Is (pantheism) `~, Tom McDonald, 2006/05/28
- Re: What Evolution Really Is (pantheism) `~, tadchem, 2006/05/30
  - Re: What Evolution Really Is (pantheism) `~, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/30
  - Re: What Evolution Really Is (pantheism) `~, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/30
Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), hetware, 2006/05/28
- Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), Igor, 2006/05/28
- Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), Mike, 2006/05/28
  - Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), hetware, 2006/05/28
    - Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), Mike, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), hetware, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), Mike, 2006/05/30
    - Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), joe_avery_2005, 2006/05/29
Cubic packing., ma1ibu, 2006/05/28
"General Relativity Examined", Kalb, 2006/05/28
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 51: Algebra, Detail-Orientation, and Bureaucracy, OsherD, 2006/05/28
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 51: Algebra, Detail-Orientation, and Bureaucracy, OsherD, 2006/05/28
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 51: Algebra, Detail-Orientation, and Bureaucracy, John Sattat, 2006/05/28
major new book on the Periodic Table, johnno, 2006/05/28
Re: Correct way to write 24 hour-time? Decimalpoint too., Rene Tschaggelar, 2006/05/27
- Re: Correct way to write 24 hour-time? Decimalpoint too., jimp, 2006/05/27
  - Re: Correct way to write 24 hour-time? Decimalpoint too., T Wake, 2006/05/27
  - Re: Correct way to write 24 hour-time? Decimalpoint too., OG, 2006/05/28
Need Help For Physics Project, djice4545, 2006/05/27
- Re: Need Help For Physics Project, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/05/27
  - Re: Need Help For Physics Project, DJ FroZone, 2006/05/27
  - Re: Need Help For Physics Project, DJ FroZone, 2006/05/27
- Re: Need Help For Physics Project, jimp, 2006/05/27
- Re: Need Help For Physics Project, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/27
  - Re: Need Help For Physics Project, John Sattat, 2006/05/27
    - Re: Need Help For Physics Project, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/28
- Re: Need Help For Physics Project, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
Difference between chance and risk, Urchie, 2006/05/27
- Re: Difference between chance and risk, Mike Yarwood, 2006/05/27
- Re: Difference between chance and risk, CWatters, 2006/05/27
- Re: Difference between chance and risk, jimp, 2006/05/27
- Re: Difference between chance and risk, tadchem, 2006/05/27
  - Message not available
    - Re: Difference between chance and risk, mmeron, 2006/05/28
- Re: Difference between chance and risk, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/29
  - Re: Difference between chance and risk, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/29
questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, mathlover, 2006/05/27
- Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
  - Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, mathlover, 2006/05/27
    - Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
    - Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/27
- Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/27
- Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/28
  - Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, mathlover, 2006/05/28
    - Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, mathlover, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/29
Noether's Theorem, actionintegral, 2006/05/27
- Re: Noether's Theorem, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
- Re: Noether's Theorem, mmeron, 2006/05/27
- Re: Noether's Theorem, Rene Tschaggelar, 2006/05/27
- Re: Noether's Theorem, actionintegral, 2006/05/27
  - Re: Noether's Theorem, Jim Black, 2006/05/28
- Re: Noether's Theorem, Mike, 2006/05/28
  - Re: Noether's Theorem, joe_avery_2005, 2006/05/29
EMRP Gravity Theory, Blaze Labs, 2006/05/27
- Re: EMRP Gravity Theory, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/27
- Re: EMRP Gravity Theory, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/27
Aquygen blog: car that runs on water?, jmurph, 2006/05/27
- Re: Aquygen blog: car that runs on water?, CWatters, 2006/05/28
BUT de broglie's ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????, NILS B�RJESSON, 2006/05/27
- Re: BUT de broglie's ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????, srp, 2006/05/27
- BUT de broglie's ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????, NILS B�RJESSON, 2006/05/27
  - Re: BUT de broglie's ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????, srp, 2006/05/27
Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Hlafordlaes, 2006/05/27
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/27
  - Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
    - Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/28
  - Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/27
    - Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/28
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, jimp, 2006/05/27
  - Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Hlafordlaes, 2006/05/28
the 4th International Conference (SETIT 2007): TUNISIA, medsalim . bouhlel, 2006/05/27
The 4th International Conference on Sciences of Electronic, Technologies of Information, medsalim . bouhlel, 2006/05/27
Finally an Odd Lens, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/27
Gripping Tale: Metal oozes in nanotubes' grasp, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/27
- Gripping Tale: Metal oozes in nanotubes' grasp, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/27
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 May 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/27
- Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 May 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/27
Re: Greek letters., Dylan Sung, 2006/05/27
- Re: Greek letters., Peter Alaca, 2006/05/27
- Translations., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/28
  - Re: Translations., Dylan Sung, 2006/05/28
    - Re: Translations., T Wake, 2006/05/28
Better Troll Barriers, Bob Cain, 2006/05/27
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 50: Initial Value Equation of the Universe, OsherD, 2006/05/27
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 49: Sub-Planck Non-Geometry is Nonsense, OsherD, 2006/05/27
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 49: Sub-Planck Non-Geometry is Nonsense, OsherD, 2006/05/27
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 49: Sub-Planck Non-Geometry is Nonsense, OsherD, 2006/05/27
    - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 49: Sub-Planck Non-Geometry is Nonsense, OsherD, 2006/05/27
light travelling to universe edge, ma1ibu, 2006/05/26
- Re: light travelling to universe edge, varun . vampire, 2006/05/27
- Re: light travelling to universe edge, John Bailey, 2006/05/27
- Re: light travelling to universe edge, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, donstockbauer, 2006/05/26
- Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, T Wake, 2006/05/27
missing cause, missing effect, ma1ibu, 2006/05/26
- Re: missing cause, missing effect, donstockbauer, 2006/05/27
- Re: missing cause, missing effect, Igor, 2006/05/27
  - Re: missing cause, missing effect, ma1ibu, 2006/05/27
    - Re: missing cause, missing effect, Igor, 2006/05/28
How to make an object invisible?, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/26
- Re: How to make an object invisible?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/27
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 48: Do Singularities Generate Mass?, OsherD, 2006/05/26
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 48: Do Singularities Generate Mass?, donstockbauer, 2006/05/26
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 48: Do Singularities Generate Mass?, OsherD, 2006/05/26
    - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 48: Do Singularities Generate Mass?, John Sattat, 2006/05/27
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 47: Probability Generates Singularities, OsherD, 2006/05/26
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 47: Probability Generates Singularities, OsherD, 2006/05/26
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 47: Probability Generates Singularities, Yotteru?, 2006/05/26
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 47: Probability Generates Singularities, Yotteru?, 2006/05/26
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 47: Probability Generates Singularities, OsherD, 2006/05/26
earth's magnetic field, mrdarrett, 2006/05/26
- Re: earth's magnetic field, jimp, 2006/05/26
- Re: earth's magnetic field, Chris, 2006/05/26
- Re: earth's magnetic field, mmeron, 2006/05/26
  - Re: earth's magnetic field, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/26
    - Re: earth's magnetic field, mmeron, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: earth's magnetic field, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: earth's magnetic field, mmeron, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: earth's magnetic field, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: earth's magnetic field, mmeron, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: earth's magnetic field, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: earth's magnetic field, mmeron, 2006/05/27
- Re: earth's magnetic field, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/26
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 May 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/26
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 778 May 26, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/26
- Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 778 May 26, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/26
The bridge between Newton and SR via Maxwell, srp, 2006/05/26
- Re: The bridge between Newton and SR via Maxwell, Greg Neill, 2006/05/26
Question about planetary magnetic fields, j . a . lively, 2006/05/26
- Re: Question about planetary magnetic fields, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/26
- Re: Question about planetary magnetic fields, jimp, 2006/05/26
- Re: Question about planetary magnetic fields, Greg Neill, 2006/05/26
Re: The faster you consume the faster you yourself will be consumed., Lizz Holmans, 2006/05/26
"Is There a Force of Gravity?", Kalb, 2006/05/26
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?", Mike, 2006/05/26
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?" [Gravity Probe B tests Einsteins General Relativity], Glenn Møller-Holst, 2006/05/26
- "Is There a Force of Gravity?", Kalb, 2006/05/26
Structural Steel Question, ABarlow, 2006/05/26
- Re: Structural Steel Question, CWatters, 2006/05/26
  - Re: Structural Steel Question, hetware, 2006/05/26
    - Re: Structural Steel Question, CWatters, 2006/05/27
- Re: Structural Steel Question, hetware, 2006/05/26
  - Re: Structural Steel Question, ABarlow, 2006/05/27
    - Re: Structural Steel Question, hetware, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Structural Steel Question, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Structural Steel Question, hetware, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Structural Steel Question, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Structural Steel Question, tj Frazir, 2006/05/28
Rate of dissolving gases to water, stuomiva, 2006/05/26
- Re: Rate of dissolving gases to water, Andy Resnick, 2006/05/26
Disproof of Quantum Decoherence, wate, 2006/05/25
Heavy ions feel the squeeze, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/25
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 46: Why the Universe Operates Via Probability, OsherD, 2006/05/25
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 46: Why the Universe Operates Via Probability, OsherD, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 46: Why the Universe Operates Via Probability, OsherD, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 46: Why the Universe Operates Via Probability, Yotteru?, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 46: Why the Universe Operates Via Probability, OsherD, 2006/05/25
The moon is less dense than the earth, cooler., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/25
Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/25
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Zero-G, 2006/05/25
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, donstockbauer, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, donstockbauer, 2006/05/26
  - Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/26
    - Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
Let's face it, humans no good in space. Robots are the future, FED UP, 2006/05/25
- Re: Let's face it, humans no good in space. Robots are the future, Jumbie, 2006/05/25
- Re: Let's face it, humans no good in space. Robots are the future, Zero-G, 2006/05/25
"The Error in Relativistic Physics", Kalb, 2006/05/25
Re: Moon can supply our energy needs for ever, Rene Tschaggelar, 2006/05/25
Anomalous "memory" effects, top9, 2006/05/25
- Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, Greg Neill, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, donstockbauer, 2006/05/25
- Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, top9, 2006/05/26
    - Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, jimp, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/26
  - Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, top9, 2006/05/27
    - Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/27
Probabilities, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/25
Hey. something makes sense here: It is the Teacher, it is the hands on., Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/25
Can someone explain how women work?, Albert Zweistein, 2006/05/25
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, CWatters, 2006/05/25
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Can someone explain how women work?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Can someone explain how women work?, mmeron, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Can someone explain how women work?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Can someone explain how women work?, mmeron, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Can someone explain how women work?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Can someone explain how women work?, platopes, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Can someone explain how women work?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Can someone explain how women work?, platopes, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: Can someone explain how women work?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/27
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/25
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Can someone explain how women work?, CrankHater, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Can someone explain how women work?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/25
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Edward Green, 2006/05/27
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, ghostwriter, 2006/05/25
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, puppet_sock, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Can someone explain how women work?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Mike, 2006/05/26
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 45.1: Forces in Opposite Directions, OsherD, 2006/05/25
Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, vavroom, 2006/05/25
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, vavroom, 2006/05/25
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/05/25
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, SAIL4EVR, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, SAIL4EVR, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, SAIL4EVR, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, vavroom, 2006/05/25
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/25
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Randy Poe, 2006/05/25
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, PD, 2006/05/26
  - Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, vavroom, 2006/05/26
    - Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Mike, 2006/05/26
  - Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/26
    - Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Mike, 2006/05/26
  - Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, vavroom, 2006/05/26
    - Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, vavroom, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/28
Re: WHY'S GOD AS COOL AS A CUCUMBER?, donstockbauer, 2006/05/25
- Re: WHY'S GOD AS COOL AS A CUCUMBER?, edconrad, 2006/05/25
- Re: WHY'S GOD AS COOL AS A CUCUMBER?, George, 2006/05/25
Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 2006/05/24
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, donstockbauer, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Jumbie, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Greg Neill, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Jumbie, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Zod, General, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, mmeron, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, mmeron, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/26
Blackbodies, Emissivity, Absorptivity, Reflectance and Reality, hetware, 2006/05/24
- Re: Blackbodies, Emissivity, Absorptivity, Reflectance and Reality, Andy Resnick, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Blackbodies, Emissivity, Absorptivity, Reflectance and Reality, hetware, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Blackbodies, Emissivity, Absorptivity, Reflectance and Reality, hetware, 2006/05/26
    - Re: Blackbodies, Emissivity, Absorptivity, Reflectance and Reality, Andy Resnick, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Blackbodies, Emissivity, Absorptivity, Reflectance and Reality, hetware, 2006/05/26
Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, Mike, 2006/05/24
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 2006/05/24
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 2006/05/28
  - Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 2006/05/28
    - Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jimp, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jimp, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/30
      
      Bush doesn't go around killing people who consume less energy., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: Bush doesn't go around killing people who consume less energy., platopes, 2006/05/30
    - Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 2006/05/28
  - Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
    - Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jimp, 2006/05/29
    - Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/29
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, Alessio, 2006/05/28
Kepler, oriel36, 2006/05/24
Re: NANOPARTICLES, Andy Resnick, 2006/05/24
= eScrew code = 0 = emptiness = 1 = unity = 2 = duality = 3 = nirvana = 4 = love = 5 = time = 6 = war = 7 = perfection = 8 = eternity = 9 = judgment = eScrew code controls all computer systems on earth!!!, escrewzen, 2006/05/24
- Re: = eScrew code = 0 = emptiness = 1 = unity = 2 = duality = 3 = nirvana = 4 = love = 5 = time = 6 = war = 7 = perfection = 8 = eternity = 9 = judgment = eScrew code controls all computer systems on earth!!!, donstockbauer, 2006/05/24
Electron radiation as gravity. Electroshine?, ma1ibu, 2006/05/24
- Re: Electron radiation as gravity. Electroshine?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
"WORLDS IN COLLISION" -- Velikovsky's Masterpiece, edconrad, 2006/05/24
- Re: "WORLDS IN COLLISION" -- Velikovsky's Masterpiece, Brad Guth, 2006/05/26
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Kalb, 2006/05/24
Unidentified line in sky, neo, 2006/05/24
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/24
  - Re: Unidentified line in sky, neo, 2006/05/24
    - Re: Unidentified line in sky, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/24
    - Re: Unidentified line in sky, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
  - Re: Unidentified line in sky, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
    - Re: Unidentified line in sky, neo, 2006/05/24
    - Re: Unidentified line in sky, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Unidentified line in sky, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Unidentified line in sky, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Unidentified line in sky, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, neo, 2006/05/24
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, Igor, 2006/05/24
Gravitational radiation, electro, 2006/05/24
- Re: Gravitational radiation, donstockbauer, 2006/05/24
- Re: Gravitational radiation, Igor, 2006/05/24
- Re: Gravitational radiation, T Wake, 2006/05/24
- Re: Gravitational radiation, CrankHater, 2006/05/25
searching for a string vibration response program on SCILAB, Hollywood, 2006/05/24
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 45: The "Push" of "Space/Time", OsherD, 2006/05/24
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 45: The "Push" of "Space/Time", Jumbie, 2006/05/24
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 45: The "Push" of "Space/Time", OsherD, 2006/05/25
green's functions, vicky shaw, 2006/05/24
Re: I randomly see a TV anywhere... _Very_ randomly., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
- Why I selfishly post code., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Why I selfishly post code., Anal Fissure, 2006/05/23
    - VS is just the best editor in existence, that's all., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: VS is just the best editor in existence, that's all., Anal Fissure, 2006/05/24
      
      You can run X.EXE yourself on Win_XP., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: You can run X.EXE yourself on Win_XP., T Wake, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: VS is just the best editor in existence, that's all., Anal Fissure, 2006/05/24
    - Re: Why I selfishly spew irrelevant tripe into the astro newsgroups!, Nagas Larc, 2006/05/25
- The Pattern of Tiny Feet, platopes, 2006/05/24
- Re: I randomly see a TV anywhere... _Very_ randomly., T Wake, 2006/05/24
Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, mike3, 2006/05/23
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, donstockbauer, 2006/05/23
    - Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/24
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/24
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, John Bailey, 2006/05/24
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/24
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, Igor, 2006/05/24
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, PD, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, mmeron, 2006/05/25
potential due to a disc, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/23
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 44: Universe-Generating Theorem, OsherD, 2006/05/23
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 44: Universe-Generating Theorem, OsherD, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 44: Universe-Generating Theorem, OsherD, 2006/05/23
    - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 44: Universe-Generating Theorem, Afropop@xxxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/23
Lookup Jeff_Relf_2006_May_23_CrQo@xxxxxxxxx in Google., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
- Re: Lookup Jeff_Relf_2006_May_23_CrQo@xxxxxxxxx in Google., T Wake, 2006/05/23
Re: Stars consume, a lit match consumes... it's not true free will., Starlord, 2006/05/23
Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _X_Report_, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
- Re: Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _X_Report_, T Wake, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _X_Report_, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
    - Re: Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _X_Report_, T Wake, 2006/05/23
- Re: Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _X_Report_, CrankHater, 2006/05/24
Gagnonrchrd is using FireFox on Win_98 !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
- Re: Gagnonrchrd is using FireFox on Win_98 !, T Wake, 2006/05/23
- Re: Gagnonrchrd is using FireFox on Win_98 !, Golden Boar, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Gagnonrchrd is using FireFox on Win_98 !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
How hard can a human suck?, john . midgley, 2006/05/23
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, PD, 2006/05/23
  - Re: How hard can a human suck?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/23
  - Re: How hard can a human suck?, john . midgley, 2006/05/24
    - Re: How hard can a human suck?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
    - Re: How hard can a human suck?, Richard Herring, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: How hard can a human suck?, PD, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: How hard can a human suck?, Richard Herring, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: How hard can a human suck?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/30
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, OG, 2006/05/23
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/23
  - Re: How hard can a human suck?, Tony, 2006/05/23
    - Re: How hard can a human suck?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: How hard can a human suck?, nibblenot, 2006/05/25
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, Edgar A Pearlstein, 2006/05/23
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, tadchem, 2006/05/24
  - Re: How hard can a human suck?, FED UP, 2006/05/24
  - Re: How hard can a human suck?, Richard Herring, 2006/05/25
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, ghostwriter, 2006/05/25
Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), dave . harper, 2006/05/23
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), lucasea, 2006/05/23
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), David Bostwick, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), dave . harper, 2006/05/23
    - Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), dave . harper, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), PV, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), PV, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), PV, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Ken Muldrew, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Ken Muldrew, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmfbahciv, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmfbahciv, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), daestrom, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmfbahciv, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmfbahciv, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmfbahciv, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Ned Simmons, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmfbahciv, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), AZ Nomad, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), David Bostwick, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), AZ Nomad, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Mark Thorson, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), The Sorcerer, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), PV, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), PV, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), The Sorcerer, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), The Sorcerer, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), ghostwriter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), David Bostwick, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), PV, 2006/05/23
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/24
    - Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), fkasner, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), AZ Nomad, 2006/05/23
    - Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
    - Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/25
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), dgp, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Madalch, 2006/05/23
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), fkasner, 2006/05/24
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmurph, 2006/05/27
  - Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 2006/05/27
Action Principle and Newton's Laws, joe_avery_2005, 2006/05/23
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, actionintegral, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/23
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, dedanoe, 2006/05/23
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/23
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, Igor, 2006/05/23
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, Mike, 2006/05/24
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/24
Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, galt_57, 2006/05/23
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, galt_57, 2006/05/23
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/24
    - Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/24
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, Jim Black, 2006/05/23
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, PD, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, mmeron, 2006/05/23
    - Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, galt_57, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, mmeron, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, noshellswill, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, mmeron, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, galt_57, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, galt_57, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/25
Largest Map of Universe Yet Bolsters Theories about Dark Energ, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
- Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, platopes, 2006/05/24
  - Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, Herman Rubin, 2006/05/24
    - Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/25
- Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, John Schutkeker, 2006/05/26
  - Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, Herman Rubin, 2006/05/26
    - Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, Minus XVII, 2006/05/26
- Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, david petry, 2006/05/26
Is More Than One Quark Needed?, Kalb, 2006/05/23
- Is More Than One Quark Needed?, Kalb, 2006/05/23
druge flashback, asdf, 2006/05/23
Golden buckyball like structures of only 16 gold atoms., Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/23
Re: THE REAL FRUSTRATION OF ALBERT EINSTEIN, donstockbauer, 2006/05/23
green's function in a hemisphere, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/23
- Re: green's function in a hemisphere, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/23
Re: WHY ALL BODIES "FALL" AT THE SAME RATE, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/23
- Re: WHY ALL BODIES "FALL" AT THE SAME RATE, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/23
Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/23
- Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Brad Guth, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Brad Guth, 2006/05/24
    - Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      I think the economy will bottom out around 2015., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Randy Poe, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
- Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/23
Re: Where's true free will ?, Denis Loubet, 2006/05/23
- Re: Where's true free will ?, T Wake, 2006/05/23
  - Point blank, omniscience and omnipotence means _No_ free will., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
    - Re: Point blank, omniscience and omnipotence means _No_ free will., T Wake, 2006/05/23
Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, Dan in Philly, 2006/05/22
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, actionintegral, 2006/05/22
  - Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, actionintegral, 2006/05/22
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/22
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, Dan in Philly, 2006/05/22
  - Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, Dan in Philly, 2006/05/22
    - Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/23
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, actionintegral, 2006/05/23
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, CWatters, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, CWatters, 2006/05/23
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, pete, 2006/05/25
new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, yinbing-zhou, 2006/05/22
"The Properties of the Aether", Kalb, 2006/05/22
---> VOTING UPDATE <--- HELP SMITHSONIAN CHOOSE A BRAND-NEW LOGO -- Based on Its Scientific Integrity -- Evolution -- Why, I'll Be a Uncle's Monkey!, Ed Conrad, 2006/05/22
Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/22
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Richard Herring, 2006/05/22
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/26
  - Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/27
    - Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/27
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, mmeron, 2006/05/27
  - Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Edward Green, 2006/05/27
    - Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Edward Green, 2006/05/28
  - Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, mmeron, 2006/05/28
Re: An unprecedents proofe the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 2006/05/22
- Re: An unprecedents proofe the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/22
  - Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 2006/05/23
    - Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Golden Boar, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Golden Boar, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, dda1, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Golden Boar, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, dda1, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Golden Boar, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Golden Boar, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, dda1, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Golden Boar, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, dda1, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, dda1, 2006/05/23
- Re: An unprecedents proofe the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, dda1, 2006/05/23
leverian method of approximations, dedanoe, 2006/05/22
- Re: leverian method of approximations, dedanoe, 2006/05/25
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 22, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2006/05/22
- Re: New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 22, 2006, yinbing-zhou, 2006/05/22
- Re: New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 22, 2006, yinbing-zhou, 2006/05/22
reductionist science, electro, 2006/05/22
- Re: reductionist science, donstockbauer, 2006/05/22
- Re: reductionist science, Igor, 2006/05/22
  - Re: reductionist science, uri, 2006/05/23
    - Re: reductionist science, Igor, 2006/05/23
    - Re: reductionist science, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/05/24
- Re: reductionist science, platopes, 2006/05/24
capacitance of a rectangular box, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/22
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, CWatters, 2006/05/22
  - Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/22
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/22
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/22
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, PD, 2006/05/22
  - Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/22
    - Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/22
    - Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, PD, 2006/05/22
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/22
  - Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/22
    - Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, PD, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Mike Yarwood, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jimp, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jimp, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jimp, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Ken Muldrew, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, CWatters, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/23
Re: Atheists *HATE* Intelligent Design (was: Check out the "Top 10 Questions"), Lizz Holmans, 2006/05/22
- Re: Atheists *HATE* Intelligent Design (was: Check out the "Top 10 Questions"), B1ackwater, 2006/05/22
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization Labelling Typo: 43.3, OsherD, 2006/05/21
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization Labelling Typo: 43.3, J karumbia, 2006/05/22
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Remarkable Super-Median Orbit, OsherD, 2006/05/21
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Remarkable Super-Median Orbit, OsherD, 2006/05/21
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Remarkable Super-Median Orbit, OsherD, 2006/05/21
    - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Remarkable Super-Median Orbit, OsherD, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Remarkable Super-Median Orbit, J Kraambala, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Remarkable Super-Median Orbit, OsherD, 2006/05/21
The Quarks Inside Protons Pop In and Out of Existence, mandotar, 2006/05/21
- Re: The Quarks Inside Protons Pop In and Out of Existence, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/21
- Re: The Quarks Inside Protons Pop In and Out of Existence, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/21
Definition of entropy of macrosystem, Sergey Karavashkin, 2006/05/21
What quantity or quantities have units of kg s m^-1 ?, Golden Boar, 2006/05/21
Horror Theory of Physics Creativity 2: Revision of Some of My Ideas, OsherD, 2006/05/21
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43.1: Orbits of Complicated Probable Influence/Causation, OsherD, 2006/05/21
Re: FRAUD IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS, Dirk Van de Androcles, 2006/05/21
Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/21
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 2006/05/21
  - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/21
    - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/21
  - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/21
    - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/25
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, tadchem, 2006/05/21
  - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/21
    - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/22
    - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, tadchem, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Randy Poe, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Randy Poe, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/21
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, CWatters, 2006/05/22
  - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/22
    - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, CWatters, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, CWatters, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, CWatters, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 2006/05/23
    - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, CWatters, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/24
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, tadchem, 2006/05/27
  - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
    - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, tadchem, 2006/05/30
  - Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
Physicists Wanted for collaboration, atxinter, 2006/05/21
- Re: Physicists Wanted for collaboration, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2006/05/21
  - Re: Physicists Wanted for collaboration, gjedwards, 2006/05/21
- Re: Physicists Wanted for collaboration, Dirk Van de Androcles, 2006/05/21
  - Re: Physicists Wanted for collaboration, atxinter, 2006/05/21
    - Re: Physicists Wanted for collaboration, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/05/22
- Re: Physicists Wanted for collaboration, Douglas Eagleson, 2006/05/22
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Orbits of Probable Influence/Causation, OsherD, 2006/05/21
"Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Moc, 2006/05/21
- Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", BernardZ, 2006/05/21
COUMARIN DYE, oshrat.harush@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/21
Theoretical experiment on relativity, drme1981@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/20
- Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, actionintegral, 2006/05/22
  - Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/22
    - Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, actionintegral, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/23
    - Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, actionintegral, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/23
- Theoretical experiment on relativity, drme1981@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/21
How much charge does it take?, mike3, 2006/05/20
- Re: How much charge does it take?, mmeron, 2006/05/20
  - Re: How much charge does it take?, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/22
    - Re: How much charge does it take?, mmeron, 2006/05/22
- Re: How much charge does it take?, Greg Neill, 2006/05/20
- Re: How much charge does it take?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/21
dedanoe talks crystalization, dedanoe, 2006/05/20
PK Dick, VALIS, History of Physics, PSI WARS!, Jack Sarfatti, 2006/05/20
Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 8: McCay Bivariate Gamma, OsherD, 2006/05/20
Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/20
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/21
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/21
    - Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, Dirk Van de Androcles, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/23
      
      Message not available
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/23
      
      Message not available
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, zorrrrorobbbbinhood, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, stewart_connor, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, Richard Henry, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, stewart_connor, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/28
"The Arrow of Time", Moc, 2006/05/20
- Re: "The Arrow of Time", kunzmilan, 2006/05/23
  - Re: "The Arrow of Time", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
Physics is dead!, neo, 2006/05/20
- Re: Physics is dead!, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/20
- Re: Physics is dead!, Tom Roberts, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Physics is dead!, shevek, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Physics is dead!, jimp, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Physics is dead!, noshellswill, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Physics is dead!, Vert, 2006/05/21
    - Re: Physics is dead!, dda1, 2006/05/23
    - Re: Physics is dead!, PD, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, dda1, 2006/05/23
- Re: Physics is dead!, dedanoe, 2006/05/20
- Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/05/22
  - Re: Physics is dead!, Harry, 2006/05/22
    - Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, dda1, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Harry, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, dedanoe, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Physics is dead!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Physics is dead!, PD, 2006/05/23
    - Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, John Christiansen, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Harry, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, PD, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Physics is dead!, Harry, 2006/05/30
- Re: Physics is dead!, platopes, 2006/05/24
WARNING Sam Wormhole Fails Turing Test, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/20
- Re: WARNING Sam Wormhole Fails Turing Test, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
- Re: WARNING Sam Wormhole Fails Turing Test, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/20
- Re: WARNING Sam Wormhole Fails Turing Test, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
- Re: WARNING Sam Wormhole Fails Turing Test, Dirk Van de Androcles, 2006/05/22
The Jesus Christ Code. ©, caesarjbsquitti, 2006/05/20
boxes, STUARTe, 2006/05/20
RT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS B�RJESSON, 2006/05/20
Computer Enhancement Reveals Pentagon Object Identity, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 2006/05/20
- Re: Computer Enhancement Reveals Pentagon Object Identity, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/20
The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Peter Christensen, 2006/05/20
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Paul Cardinale, 2006/05/20
  - Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Peter Christensen, 2006/05/21
    - Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Paul Cardinale, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), The Sorcerer, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Paul Cardinale, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), The Sorcerer, 2006/05/29
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Chip Eastham, 2006/05/20
  - Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Peter Christensen, 2006/05/20
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), tadchem, 2006/05/20
  - Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Peter Christensen, 2006/05/20
    - Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), tadchem, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Peter Christensen, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), tadchem, 2006/05/27
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Dirk Van de Androcles, 2006/05/21
young at heart fear not, dedanoe, 2006/05/20
- Re: young at heart fear not, dedanoe, 2006/05/20
Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Herb Martin, 2006/05/20
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, John Christiansen, 2006/05/20
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, tadchem, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Herb Martin, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, tadchem, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Edward Green, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, tadchem, 2006/05/21
  - Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/21
    - Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Herb Martin, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Herb Martin, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/24
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Herb Martin, 2006/05/26
Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 2006/05/20
- Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 2006/05/20
- Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, Bob Cain, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, cnctut, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 2006/05/21
    - Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, Bob Cain, 2006/05/21
Möbius at the Shopping Mall, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/19
- Re: Möbius at the Shopping Mall, Paul Cardinale, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Möbius at the Shopping Mall, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Möbius at the Shopping Mall, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Möbius at the Shopping Mall, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/22
  - Re: Re: Möbius at the Shopping Mall, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Mvbius at the Shopping Mall, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/20
Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 7.1, OsherD, 2006/05/19
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 7.1, OsherD, 2006/05/19
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 19 May 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/19
- Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 19 May 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, OsherD, 2006/05/20
Change of focus for liquid crystals, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/19
Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 7: Plackett Family Correlation, OsherD, 2006/05/19
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 7: Plackett Family Correlation, OsherD, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 7: Plackett Family Correlation, Jake, 2006/05/19
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 7: Plackett Family Correlation, Jake, 2006/05/19
Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/05/19
- Bye Bye anthropic principle ! nice to have known ya., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Bye Bye anthropic principle ! nice to have known ya., T Wake, 2006/05/22
    - Why Lambda_CDM is the standard model., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Why Lambda_CDM is the standard model., T Wake, 2006/05/23
- Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less., Sam Wormley, 2006/05/19
- Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less., tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
Relative speed..., Externet, 2006/05/19
- Re: Relative speed..., Sam Wormley, 2006/05/19
- Re: Relative speed..., Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Relative speed..., Hexenmeister, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Relative speed..., Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/20
- Re: Relative speed..., OG, 2006/05/19
- Re: Relative speed..., Hexenmeister, 2006/05/20
- Re: Relative speed..., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Relative speed..., Dirk Van de Androcles, 2006/05/21
    - Re: Relative speed..., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Relative speed..., The Sorcerer, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Relative speed..., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Relative speed..., The Sorcerer, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Relative speed..., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Relative speed..., The Sorcerer, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Relative speed..., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Relative speed..., The Sorcerer, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Relative speed..., Bob Cain, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: Relative speed..., The Sorcerer, 2006/05/30
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 May 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/19
Re: Apparently, it's ok to monkeys..., donstockbauer, 2006/05/19
- Re: Apparently, it's ok to monkeys..., dda1, 2006/05/19
MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE, ACE, 2006/05/19
- MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE, ACE, 2006/05/23
Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 2006/05/19
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Igor, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 2006/05/20
- Re: Conservation of Energy, mmeron, 2006/05/19
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/19
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 2006/05/19
    - Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 2006/05/21
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/19
    - Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, joe_avery_2005, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/29
    - Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/28
  - Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, frank_k_sheldon, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, frank_k_sheldon, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, frank_k_sheldon, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, mmeron, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Conservation of Energy, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/24
  - Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/24
    - Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/25
- Re: Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 2006/05/22
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/24
  - Re: Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 2006/05/24
    - Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, mmeron, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 2006/05/25
Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, dedanoe, 2006/05/19
- Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, Mike, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, dedanoe, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, dedanoe, 2006/05/20
- Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, tadchem, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, dedanoe, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, Ioannis, 2006/05/21
Re: 67,000 ships moved out of the way for China's Typhoon Chanchu, tj Frazir, 2006/05/19
- Re: 67,000 ships moved out of the way for China's Typhoon Chanchu, tj Frazir, 2006/05/20
"The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Moc, 2006/05/19
(THE MASS)^3= H.h.h/G/c!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS B�RJESSON, 2006/05/19
- Re: (THE MASS)^3= H.h.h/G/c!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/19
Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/19
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, jcon, 2006/05/19
    - Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/19
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Edward Green, 2006/05/20
    - Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Koobee Wublee, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Mike, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, koobee . wublee, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, koobee . wublee, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, karensbasketry, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, jowr . pi, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, koobee . wublee, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, koobee . wublee, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, jowr . pi, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, 2, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Randy Poe, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, koobee . wublee, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Randy Poe, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Randy Poe, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Randy Poe, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, SAIL4EVR, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Matt, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, 2, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/28
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Bilge, 2006/05/22
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, SAIL4EVR, 2006/05/25
  - Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, 2, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, 2, 2006/05/25
    - Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, koobee . wublee, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Y.Porat, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      Usenet/Web is the best way to let the poor have a voice., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/29
  - Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, tj Frazir, 2006/05/25
    - The Tech_Booms of the late 20's, late 60's and late 90's., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: The Tech_Booms of the late 20's, late 60's and late 90's., tj Frazir, 2006/05/28
      
      Who or what is Luna ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Who or what is Luna ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Who or what is Luna ?, T Wake, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Who or what is Luna ?, 'foolsrushin', 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Who or what is Luna ?, nibblenot, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Who or what is Luna ?, 'foolsrushin', 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Who or what is Luna ?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
      
      The moon's surface had 1.25 millirads per _Hour_., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: The moon's surface had 1.25 millirads per _Hour_., tj Frazir, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Who or what is Luna ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/28
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, puppet_sock, 2006/05/29
Jesus was preachin the Archimedes' teachin, dedanoe, 2006/05/19
- Re: Jesus was preachin the Archimedes' teachin, dedanoe, 2006/05/19
Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 6: Gumbel Bivariate Exponential, OsherD, 2006/05/19
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 6: Gumbel Bivariate Exponential, OsherD, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 6: Gumbel Bivariate Exponential, OsherD, 2006/05/19
    - Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 6: Gumbel Bivariate Exponential, OsherD, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 6: Gumbel Bivariate Exponential, OsherD, 2006/05/19
Questions about the big bang and black holes, Carl Weidling, 2006/05/19
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/19
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, donstockbauer, 2006/05/19
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, PD, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/19
    - Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, ma1ibu, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, Dirk Van de Androcles, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/22
    - Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/19
- The temperature of water/life is nothing special., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/21
  - Unifying the observed forces., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/21
[Help] Physical Explanations On Resonance Needed ?, CSL, 2006/05/19
- Re: [Help] Physical Explanations On Resonance Needed ?, jimp, 2006/05/19
  - Re: [Help] Physical Explanations On Resonance Needed ?, CSL, 2006/05/19
- Re: [Help] Physical Explanations On Resonance Needed ?, CWatters, 2006/05/19
  - Re: [Help] Physical Explanations On Resonance Needed ?, CSL, 2006/05/19
What is the maximum possible magnetic field allowed in our universe? Answer: 10^42 Gauss ?, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/18
- Re: What is the maximum possible magnetic field allowed in our universe? Answer: 10^42 Gauss ?, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/19
Improbable Influence/Causation: Impractical Techniques to Avoid DWI Type Relationships 6: Chuckie Meets Bambie, KOsher Bimborow, 2006/05/18
The IQ of Black America, Deev, 2006/05/18
questions about electron natural frequency, wate, 2006/05/18
- Re: questions about electron natural frequency, Randy Poe, 2006/05/18
  - Re: questions about electron natural frequency, wate, 2006/05/18
    - Re: questions about electron natural frequency, donstockbauer, 2006/05/19
    - Re: questions about electron natural frequency, Randy Poe, 2006/05/19
    - Re: questions about electron natural frequency, panteltje, 2006/05/19
    - Re: questions about electron natural frequency, PD, 2006/05/19
- Re: questions about electron natural frequency, Jim Black, 2006/05/22
The Mechanics Friend vintage engineering FA, JaneyP, 2006/05/18
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 777 May 18, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/18
"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Moc, 2006/05/18
"Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/18
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", oriel36, 2006/05/18
  - Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Igor, 2006/05/18
    - Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", oriel36, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Igor, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", tomgee, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Igor, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", tomgee, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Igor, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Hexenmeister, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", tomgee, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Sorcerer, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Sorcerer, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", oriel36, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", tomgee, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", oriel36, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Igor, 2006/05/21
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", FrediFizzx, 2006/05/19
just talking science, dedanoe, 2006/05/18
- Re: just talking science, dedanoe, 2006/05/18
THE PROTON RADIUS 28.5 FERMI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS B�RJESSON, 2006/05/18
Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 5: PI Beats Mainstream For Morgenstern Family, OsherD, 2006/05/18
Is Physics true?, fraternitydisposal@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/18
- Re: Is Physics true?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/18
- Re: Is Physics true?, Rene Tschaggelar, 2006/05/18
  - Re: Is Physics true?, donstockbauer, 2006/05/18
    - Re: Is Physics true?, FED UP, 2006/05/18
- Re: Is Physics true?, Igor, 2006/05/18
- Re: Is Physics true?, PD, 2006/05/18
- Re: Is Physics true?, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/18
  - Re: Is Physics true?, fraternitydisposal@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/18
    - Re: Is Physics true?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Is Physics true?, Bob Cain, 2006/05/18
    - Re: Is Physics true?, Robert J. Kolker, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Is Physics true?, shevek, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Is Physics true?, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Is Physics true?, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Is Physics true?, Sue..., 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Is Physics true?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/21
- Re: Is Physics true?, jimp, 2006/05/20
Quarks and gluons, ME, 2006/05/18
- Re: Quarks and gluons, srp, 2006/05/18
  - Re: Quarks and gluons, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/18
    - Re: Quarks and gluons, srp, 2006/05/18
  - Re: Quarks and gluons, ME, 2006/05/18
    - Re: Quarks and gluons, srp, 2006/05/18
  - Re: Quarks and gluons, ME, 2006/05/20
question about solid conductors, solid leg wires on detonators?, chemstu, 2006/05/18
- Re: question about solid conductors, solid leg wires on detonators?, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/05/18
- Re: question about solid conductors, solid leg wires on detonators?, chemstu, 2006/05/19
- Re: question about solid conductors, solid leg wires on detonators?, tdp1001, 2006/05/19
- Re: question about solid conductors, solid leg wires on detonators?, Edward Green, 2006/05/20
Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, jpolasek, 2006/05/17
- Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, dda1, 2006/05/17
- Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, Craig Markwardt, 2006/05/21
  - Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/21
    - Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, Richard Saam, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, Craig Markwardt, 2006/05/28
Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 4: Uniform Bivariate Distribution Families, OsherD, 2006/05/17
New Lift Technology, atxinter, 2006/05/17
- New Lift Technology, atxinter, 2006/05/17
Strong and weak nuclear forces, lugita15, 2006/05/17
- Re: Strong and weak nuclear forces, Rock Brentwood, 2006/05/17
  - Re: Strong and weak nuclear forces, lugita15, 2006/05/18
    - Re: Strong and weak nuclear forces, PD, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Strong and weak nuclear forces, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/19
Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 3: Bivariate Families of Distirbutions, OsherD, 2006/05/17
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 3: Bivariate Families of Distirbutions, OsherD, 2006/05/17
  - Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 3: Bivariate Families of Distirbutions, OsherD, 2006/05/17
    - Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 3: Bivariate Families of Distirbutions, OsherD, 2006/05/17
To Einstein, the word God meant the cosmos, as revealed by science., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/17
Quantum gases in 3D, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/17
LEDs move into the ultraviolet (210 nm), Sam Wormley, 2006/05/17
- Re: LEDs move into the ultraviolet (210 nm), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/18
  - Re: LEDs move into the ultraviolet (210 nm), Sam Wormley, 2006/05/18
    - Re: LEDs move into the ultraviolet (210 nm), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: LEDs move into the ultraviolet (210 nm), Sam Wormley, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: LEDs move into the ultraviolet (210 nm), Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/18
Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, PD, 2006/05/17
- Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, David Morgan $MAMS$, 2006/05/18
  - Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, houlepn, 2006/05/19
    - Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, David Morgan $MAMS$, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, houlepn, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, David Morgan $MAMS$, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/20
      
      Islamization of the Palestinians - Brave NUKE World, Ha-Emet, 2006/05/22
Nationwide Physics and Chemistry Sample Test, Chad J, 2006/05/17
- Re: Nationwide Physics and Chemistry Sample Test, Uncle Al, 2006/05/17
  - Re: Nationwide Physics and Chemistry Sample Test, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/19
the naci cross and dynamics of lever, dedanoe, 2006/05/17
m vs. h*nu in T_{mu,nu}, John Schutkeker, 2006/05/17
conceptual physics, Gunnar G, 2006/05/17
- Re: conceptual physics, PD, 2006/05/17
- Re: conceptual physics, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/17
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Moc, 2006/05/17
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", donstockbauer, 2006/05/17
Triboelectric amplifiers, Ian Macmillan, 2006/05/17
- Re: Triboelectric amplifiers, Andy Resnick, 2006/05/17
- Re: Triboelectric amplifiers, John Bailey, 2006/05/22
  - Re: Triboelectric amplifiers, swu, 2006/05/22
Impressive New Tricks of Light, Lu, 2006/05/17
HITLER GOVERNMENT RELEASES NEW FOOTAGE OF REICHSTAG FIRE, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 2006/05/17
- Re: HITLER GOVERNMENT RELEASES NEW FOOTAGE OF REICHSTAG FIRE, Dan, 2006/05/17
  - Re: HITLER GOVERNMENT RELEASES NEW FOOTAGE OF REICHSTAG FIRE, FatKat, 2006/05/17
    - Re: HITLER GOVERNMENT RELEASES NEW FOOTAGE OF REICHSTAG FIRE, puppet_sock, 2006/05/17
Re: FrediFakir and the mysterious "We"., Androfizzx, 2006/05/17
Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Gert, 2006/05/17
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/17
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/17
  - Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/17
    - Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/18
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/17
Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/17
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/17
  - Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, SBC Yahoo, 2006/05/17
    - Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/17
    - Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, don findlay, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, J. F. Cornwall, 2006/05/18
    - Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, J. F. Cornwall, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, tadchem, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, J.F. Cornwall, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Charles, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, tadchem, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Dirk Van de Androcles, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Charles, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jim Lillie, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 2006/05/21
  - Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/17
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 2006/05/17
  - Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Edward Hennessey, 2006/05/17
    - Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, J. F. Cornwall, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, J. F. Cornwall, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jim Lillie, 2006/05/17
    - Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, William Oertell, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, William Oertell, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Edward Hennessey, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 2006/05/21
Cellular ether theory (large TeX), Ilja Schmelzer, 2006/05/17
- Re: Cellular ether theory (large TeX), The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Cellular ether theory (large TeX), Andreas Most, 2006/05/22
How are metals classified as Hole or Electron conductors?, JAH, 2006/05/16
- Re: How are metals classified as Hole or Electron conductors?, jimp, 2006/05/16
- Re: How are metals classified as Hole or Electron conductors?, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/17
Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, Kevin, 2006/05/16
- Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, jimp, 2006/05/16
  - Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, Kevin Doyle, 2006/05/16
- Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, CSL, 2006/05/16
  - Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, jimp, 2006/05/17
    - Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, jimp, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, CSL, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, jimp, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, Kevin Doyle, 2006/05/18
HI, all, a simple question on the expectation value of angular momentum in NMR, sjsongjing, 2006/05/16
- Re: HI, all, a simple question on the expectation value of angular momentum in NMR, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/16
- Re: HI, all, a simple question on the expectation value of angular momentum in NMR, Bob Cain, 2006/05/16
  - Re: HI, all, a simple question on the expectation value of angular momentum in NMR, Johnny, 2006/05/16
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Moc, 2006/05/16
String question, p4o2, 2006/05/16
super-luminous motion, Jack, 2006/05/16
- Re: super-luminous motion, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/16
- Re: super-luminous motion, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/16
- Re: super-luminous motion, Paul Cardinale, 2006/05/16
Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 2: PI Max Entropy Better Than Shannon Max Entropy, OsherD, 2006/05/16
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 2: PI Max Entropy Better Than Shannon Max Entropy, OsherD, 2006/05/16
Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/15
- Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, mmeron, 2006/05/16
  - Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/17
    - Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, mmeron, 2006/05/17
    - Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/17
- Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, dp, 2006/05/16
- Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/17
  - Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 2006/05/18
    - Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/18
Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 1, OsherD, 2006/05/15
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 1, OsherD, 2006/05/15
  - Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 1, OsherD, 2006/05/15
    - Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 1, OsherD, 2006/05/15
    - Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 1, Johnny Abdulia, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 1, OsherD, 2006/05/17
HELP SMITHSONIAN CHOOSE ITS NEW LOGO -- Based on Its Scientific Integrity --, Ed Conrad, 2006/05/15
moderately resistive materials?, Grant W. Petty, 2006/05/15
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, tadchem, 2006/05/15
  - Re: moderately resistive materials?, Grant W. Petty, 2006/05/15
    - Re: moderately resistive materials?, tadchem, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: moderately resistive materials?, Grant W. Petty, 2006/05/16
  - Re: moderately resistive materials?, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/17
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, Johnny, 2006/05/15
  - Re: moderately resistive materials?, Grant W. Petty, 2006/05/16
  - Re: moderately resistive materials?, operator jay, 2006/05/17
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, Mark Walter, 2006/05/15
  - Re: moderately resistive materials?, Grant W. Petty, 2006/05/16
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, Rheilly Phoull, 2006/05/16
  - Re: moderately resistive materials?, Grant W. Petty, 2006/05/16
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, amdx, 2006/05/16
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, jalegris, 2006/05/19
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 42: Causation By or To a Constant and Special Relativity, OsherD, 2006/05/15
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 42: Causation By or To a Constant and Special Relativity, Amhabla Zed, 2006/05/15
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 42: Causation By or To a Constant and Special Relativity, OsherD, 2006/05/15
Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope, top9, 2006/05/15
- Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope, top9, 2006/05/20
Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or. - The movie version, donstockbauer, 2006/05/15
- Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or. - The movie version, Randy Poe, 2006/05/15
- Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or. - The movie version, SCW, 2006/05/15
High Energy Physics Computing, dalimoh@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/15
Newton III in leverian hydraulics, dedanoe, 2006/05/15
molecular orbital- cubic packing- more pictures and speculation, ma1ibu, 2006/05/15
Re: What The US Military Does Best: F*ck, Take Drugs and Blow Thin..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
"The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Moc, 2006/05/15
Re: NSA spying on all americans, tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
- Re: NSA spying on all americans, tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
BUSH TO DISCUSS ALIENS -- To Finally Admit Extraterrestrials Have Visited Earth -- To Read Henoch Prophesies -- Billy Meier -- UFOs, Ed Conrad, 2006/05/15
- Re: BUSH TO DISCUSS ALIENS -- To Finally Admit Extraterrestrials Have Visited Earth -- To Read Henoch Prophesies -- Billy Meier -- UFOs, Magus, 2006/05/15
- Re: BUSH TO DISCUSS ALIENS -- To Finally Admit Extraterrestrials Have Visited Earth -- To Read Henoch Prophesies -- Billy Meier -- UFOs, ElRon XChile, 2006/05/15
Re: Sunlight Glass Atomic Filter, tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 15, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2006/05/15
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 41: Models Where Time Generates Space, OsherD, 2006/05/15
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 41: Models Where Time Generates Space, OsherD, 2006/05/15
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 41: Models Where Time Generates Space, OsherD, 2006/05/15
Exotic matter and gravitational dipoles, mike3, 2006/05/14
- Re: Exotic matter and gravitational dipoles, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/15
- Re: Exotic matter and gravitational dipoles, Igor, 2006/05/15
Lecture of the Week: Part III: Is Evolution Sufficient?, Wirt Atmar, 2006/05/14
- Re: Lecture of the Week: Part III: Is Evolution Sufficient?, gb6724, 2006/05/15
A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), lugita15, 2006/05/14
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Edward Green, 2006/05/14
  - Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Shreyas, 2006/05/15
    - Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Sam Wormley, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Igor, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Sam Wormley, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Igor, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Sam Wormley, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Igor, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Sam Wormley, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Igor, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Edward Green, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/21
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), glhansen@xxxxxxx, 2006/05/15
  - Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/15
"Quantum Logic and Probability Theory (Stanford) Critiqued, OsherD, 2006/05/14
- Re: "Quantum Logic and Probability Theory (Stanford) Critiqued, OsherD, 2006/05/14
  - Re: "Quantum Logic and Probability Theory (Stanford) Critiqued, OsherD, 2006/05/14
Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), OsherD, 2006/05/14
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), OsherD, 2006/05/14
  - Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), OsherD, 2006/05/14
    - Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), Hexenmeister, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), OsherD, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), Hexenmeister, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), Hexenmeister, 2006/05/15
Why the frog is green?, amphibius . morales, 2006/05/14
- Re: Why the frog is green?, john, 2006/05/14
  - Re: Why the frog is green?, Edward Green, 2006/05/14
    - Re: Why the frog is green?, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/15
    - Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/15
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Greg Neill, 2006/05/14
- Re: Why the frog is green?, jimp, 2006/05/14
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/14
  - Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/14
    - Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/14
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/14
  - Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/14
    - Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/15
- Re: Why the frog is green?, tadchem, 2006/05/15
  - Re: Why the frog is green?, Andy Resnick, 2006/05/16
- Re: Why the frog is green?, pete, 2006/05/15
  - Re: Why the frog is green?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/16
Soft, Clear, Pessimistic Vocals., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
- Re: Soft, Clear, Pessimistic Vocals., T Wake, 2006/05/14
  - Re: Soft, Clear, Pessimistic Vocals., Rick, 2006/05/14
  - Alt. Wit.Jeff-Relf, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
    - Re: Alt. Wit.Jeff-Relf, T Wake, 2006/05/22
- Re: Soft, Clear, Pessimistic Vocals., Bifidus Regularus, 2006/05/14
  - Goldfrappe, Rhapsody.COM/goldfrapp, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
Properety of photon, rAgAv, 2006/05/14
- Re: Properety of photon, john, 2006/05/14
  - Re: Properety of photon, rAgAv, 2006/05/14
    - Re: Properety of photon, T Wake, 2006/05/14
    - Re: Properety of photon, john, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Properety of photon, mmeron, 2006/05/14
- Re: Properety of photon, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/14
- Re: Properety of photon, actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/14
- Re: Properety of photon, Ed Hanna, 2006/05/15
  - Re: Properety of photon, rAgAv, 2006/05/16
    - Re: Properety of photon, actionintegral, 2006/05/16
symmetrical sun rays under a cloud - why?, info, 2006/05/14
- Re: symmetrical sun rays under a cloud - why?, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/14
  - Re: symmetrical sun rays under a cloud - why?, Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/14
    - Re: symmetrical sun rays under a cloud - why?, OG, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: symmetrical sun rays under a cloud - why?, info, 2006/05/14
"The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Eht, 2006/05/14
- "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Eht, 2006/05/14
LEDs, bob, 2006/05/14
- Re: LEDs, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/14
- Re: LEDs, john, 2006/05/14
- Re: LEDs, jimp, 2006/05/14
  - Re: LEDs, Greg Neill, 2006/05/14
    - Re: LEDs, jimp, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: LEDs, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/14
Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 10: Solvutions For Weights of (1 + y - x), y/x, and z, OsherD, 2006/05/14
Re: questions for the bored., jmfbahciv, 2006/05/14
notice the difference between them two?, dedanoe, 2006/05/14
- Re: notice the difference between them two?, Igor, 2006/05/14
  - Re: notice the difference between them two?, dedanoe, 2006/05/15
    - Re: notice the difference between them two?, Randy Poe, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: notice the difference between them two?, dedanoe, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: notice the difference between them two?, Igor, 2006/05/15
The great mr. E - the time, dedanoe, 2006/05/14
sucked out of airplanes, bob, 2006/05/14
- Re: sucked out of airplanes, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/14
- Re: sucked out of airplanes, jimp, 2006/05/14
Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 9: f(x, y, z), OsherD, 2006/05/14
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 9: f(x, y, z), OsherD, 2006/05/14
  - Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 9: f(x, y, z), OsherD, 2006/05/14
Posters on Google..sci-physics, Quantum_Ranger, 2006/05/14
- Re: Posters on Google..sci-physics, donstockbauer, 2006/05/14
Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less, tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
- Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less, T Wake, 2006/05/14
Numismatic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS B�RJESSON, 2006/05/14
- Re: Numismatic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/15
  - Re: Numismatic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, donstockbauer, 2006/05/18
Dark Energy caused by Cosmological Constant or Quintessence??, Tarop, 2006/05/13
- Re: Dark Energy caused by Cosmological Constant or Quintessence??, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Dark Energy caused by Cosmological Constant or Quintessence??, Tarop, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Dark Energy caused by Cosmological Constant or Quintessence??, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Dark Energy caused by Cosmological Constant or Quintessence??, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/14
- Re: Dark Energy caused by Cosmological Constant or Quintessence??, Quantum_Ranger, 2006/05/13
How to calculate Vacuum Energy Density (120 magnitude), Tarop, 2006/05/13
- Re: How to calculate Vacuum Energy Density (120 magnitude), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/13
  - Re: How to calculate Vacuum Energy Density (120 magnitude), Tarop, 2006/05/14
    - Re: How to calculate Vacuum Energy Density (120 magnitude), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/14
Shrinking universe, Protoman, 2006/05/13
- Re: Shrinking universe, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Shrinking universe, Protoman, 2006/05/13
- Re: Shrinking universe, Quantum_Ranger, 2006/05/14
Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/13
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 2006/05/18
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, PD, 2006/05/18
  - Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 2006/05/18
    - Re: Understanding the Action Integral, PD, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Understanding the Action Integral, PD, 2006/05/18
  - Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Mike, 2006/05/18
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/18
  - Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 2006/05/19
    - Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Mike, 2006/05/19
    - Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Mike, 2006/05/19
    - Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Mike, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/20
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Mike, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 2006/05/19
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 2006/05/24
  - Re: Understanding the Action Integral, mmeron, 2006/05/24
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 2006/05/24
Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 8: Median's Role, OsherD, 2006/05/13
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 8: Median's Role, OsherD, 2006/05/13
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 40: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, OsherD, 2006/05/13
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 40: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, OsherD, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 40: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, OsherD, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 40: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, Quantum_Ranger, 2006/05/14
    - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 40: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, OsherD, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 40: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, Quantum_Ranger, 2006/05/14
- Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/05/14
  - Re: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, OsherD, 2006/05/14
    - Re: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/05/15
  - Re: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/05/20
- The temperature of water/life is nothing special., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/20
  - Re: The temperature of water/life is nothing special., T Wake, 2006/05/22
Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 6: Truncated Real Laurent Series and Medians, OsherD, 2006/05/13
GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE, ACE, 2006/05/13
Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 5: Super-Super-Force f(x, 0), OsherD, 2006/05/13
Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 4: Super-Force Diagonal x = y, OsherD, 2006/05/13
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 4: Super-Force Diagonal x = y, OsherD, 2006/05/13
"Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Eht, 2006/05/13
- Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/14
  - Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/14
- "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Eht, 2006/05/13
Echo, Gunnar G, 2006/05/13
- Re: Echo, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/13
- Re: Echo, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/13
Salt water evaporation, Eddie Cantor, 2006/05/13
- Re: Salt water evaporation, Edward Green, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Salt water evaporation, Eddie Cantor, 2006/05/14
    - Re: Salt water evaporation, Edward Green, 2006/05/14
- Re: Salt water evaporation, jimp, 2006/05/13
Isotope electronic effects, Angelo, 2006/05/13
- Re: Isotope electronic effects, mmeron, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Isotope electronic effects, Angelo, 2006/05/14
    - Re: Isotope electronic effects, mmeron, 2006/05/14
- Re: Isotope electronic effects, tadchem, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Isotope electronic effects, Angelo, 2006/05/15
- Re: Isotope electronic effects, Salmon Egg, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Isotope electronic effects, Angelo, 2006/05/15
Re: EINSTEIN'S NEW THEORY OF INFORMATION, Jim Black, 2006/05/13
Quantum Computers, Rick Sobie, 2006/05/13
- Re: Quantum Computers, Yawmon, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Quantum Computers, donstockbauer, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 2006/05/13
What is a ptl??, Dennis, 2006/05/13
- Re: What is a ptl??, Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/13
  - Re: What is a ptl??, petersamir10, 2006/05/13
    - Re: What is a ptl??, Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/13
    - Re: What is a ptl??, tadchem, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: What is a ptl??, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: What is a ptl??, tadchem, 2006/05/15
  - Re: What is a ptl??, greysky, 2006/05/14
- Re: What is a ptl??, Tarop, 2006/05/13
- Re: What is a ptl??, Richard Herring, 2006/05/15
Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 3: Phase-Changing Constants, OsherD, 2006/05/13
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 3: Phase-Changing Constants, OsherD, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 3: Phase-Changing Constants, OsherD, 2006/05/13
Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 2: Typo Correction, OsherD, 2006/05/13
Any good links for cosmology (Web or newsgroups), Jacky Luk, 2006/05/13
- Re: Any good links for cosmology (Web or newsgroups), Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/13
Define Temperature, hetware, 2006/05/13
- Re: Define Temperature, srp, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Define Temperature, hetware, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Define Temperature, srp, 2006/05/13
- Re: Define Temperature, tadchem, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Define Temperature, mmeron, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Define Temperature, pete, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Define Temperature, mmeron, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Define Temperature, tadchem, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Define Temperature, hetware, 2006/05/24
New look for "Newton's bucket", Sam Wormley, 2006/05/12
- Re: New look for "Newton's bucket", tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 12 May 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/12
Muslim rave party, verbatim, 2006/05/12
dedanoe goes supersonic, dedanoe, 2006/05/12
- Re: dedanoe goes supersonic, Immortalist, 2006/05/13
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 May 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/12
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 May 06 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/13
Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/12
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 2006/05/12
  - Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/12
    - Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Dr. Planckenstein, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Dr. Planckenstein, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Dr. Planckenstein, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Dr. Planckenstein, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/13
      
      Coerrection - Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/13
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Bilge, 2006/05/14
The Physics of the Tsunami, Coynil, 2006/05/12
"Corrections to Special Relativity", Eht, 2006/05/12
Paper: Fall in Earth's Magnetic Field Is Erratic, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2006/05/12
Inefficiency of secret research?, isaackoi2, 2006/05/12
- Re: Inefficiency of secret research?, grisly, 2006/05/12
girls love to leave dedanoe, dedanoe, 2006/05/12
Coin animation explained, ma1ibu, 2006/05/12
- Re: Coin animation explained, hhc314, 2006/05/12
  - Re: Coin animation explained, ma1ibu, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Coin animation explained, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Coin animation explained, ma1ibu, 2006/05/13
- Re: Coin animation explained, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/13
  - Re: Coin animation explained, ma1ibu, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Coin animation explained, ma1ibu, 2006/05/13
Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability, OsherD, 2006/05/12
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability, OsherD, 2006/05/12
  - Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability, OsherD, 2006/05/12
Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/11
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, tadchem, 2006/05/12
  - Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, mmeron, 2006/05/12
    - Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, ma1ibu, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, tadchem, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, Tom H., 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, Rick, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, tadchem, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, tadchem, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, Bruce E. Stemplewski, 2006/05/12
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, J. J. Lodder, 2006/05/12
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
  - Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, T Wake, 2006/05/13
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
Re: A question of discrete space-time (the paper)., Ed Hanna, 2006/05/11
NaI scintillation counter efficiency, Allan Adler, 2006/05/11
- Re: NaI scintillation counter efficiency, john, 2006/05/11
- Re: NaI scintillation counter efficiency, grisly, 2006/05/11
  - Re: NaI scintillation counter efficiency, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/12
9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, noahdove7, 2006/05/11
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/11
  - Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Phil Holman, 2006/05/11
    - Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, john, 2006/05/11
    - Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, namlohip, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/15
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/11
  - Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, noahdove7, 2006/05/12
    - Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, noahdove7, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/12
    - Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/12
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 231), Phil Carmody, 2006/05/11
This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/11
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., puppet_sock, 2006/05/11
  - Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/11
    - Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., platopes, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., john, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 2006/05/12
Dandelion seed, Steve Nelson, 2006/05/11
- Re: Dandelion seed, jimp, 2006/05/11
- Re: Dandelion seed, puppet_sock, 2006/05/11
  - Re: Dandelion seed, Ian Stirling, 2006/05/12
- Re: Dandelion seed, Ian Stirling, 2006/05/11
  - Message not available
    - Re: Dandelion seed, tadchem, 2006/05/27
- Re: Dandelion seed, cnctut, 2006/05/11
Collatz 3n+1 Conjecture, cafeinst, 2006/05/11
- Re: Collatz 3n+1 Conjecture, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/11
  - Re: Collatz 3n+1 Conjecture, cafeinst, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Collatz 3n+1 Conjecture, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/11
Imaging agent for Nuk stress test ?, john, 2006/05/11
- Re: Imaging agent for Nuk stress test ?, tadchem, 2006/05/11
  - Re: Imaging agent for Nuk stress test ?, john, 2006/05/11
A variation on the two slit experiment, kuriousoranj, 2006/05/11
Article: NASA Agrees To Cooperate With India On Lunar Mission, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2006/05/11
once is not enough, dedanoe, 2006/05/11
- Re: once is not enough, john, 2006/05/11
"Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Eht, 2006/05/11
i have two questions, v, 2006/05/11
- Re: i have two questions, tadchem, 2006/05/11
PhysX chip now availabe for PC and in several graphics cards, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/11
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 39: Probability in Cosmology, OsherD, 2006/05/11
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 39: Probability in Cosmology, OsherD, 2006/05/11
A Brief History of Stephen Hawking, Bits, 2006/05/11
- Re: A Brief History of Stephen Hawking, donstockbauer, 2006/05/11
- Re: A Brief History of Stephen Hawking, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/12
Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, franklinhu, 2006/05/11
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2006/05/11
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Double-A, 2006/05/11
  - Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Fredrik Bulow, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Henry Spencer, 2006/05/12
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, tadchem, 2006/05/11
  - Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, tadchem, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, PD, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, PD, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, tadchem, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, tadchem, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, franklinhu, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Henry Spencer, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Bill Owen, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Henry Spencer, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Jeff Root, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, 281979, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, 281979, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, 281979, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Craig Markwardt, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Craig Markwardt, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, jimp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Craig Markwardt, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Craig Markwardt, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/21
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, tadchem, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 2006/05/15
    - Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Steve Willner, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, tadchem, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, 281979, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, 281979, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
  - Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, John Zinni, 2006/05/13
  - The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Mark-T, 2006/05/22
    - Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Jeff Root, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., The Sorcerer, 2006/05/22
    - Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., FrediFizzx, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Jeff Root, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., The Sorcerer, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Henry Spencer, 2006/05/22
    - Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Henry Spencer, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., John Zinni, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., John Zinni, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Mark-T, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., mmeron, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Sjouke Burry, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., tapwater, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/24
    - Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Double-A, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Mark-T, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Henry Spencer, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Double-A, 2006/05/24
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, PD, 2006/05/11
  - Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, muddy, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Bill Owen, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, 281979, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/20
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, John Ladasky, 2006/05/19
  - Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, honestjohn, 2006/05/19
How Neptune's largest moon, Triton, was captured, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/10
- Re: How Neptune's largest moon, Triton, was captured, Chuck Taylor, 2006/05/11
Re: Ex-CIA analyst: Rumsfeld LIED about Iraqi link to Al Qaida, tj Frazir, 2006/05/10
- Once glance at the pump prices and you know what the dollar is worth., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/11
  - Re: Once glance at the pump prices and you know what the dollar is worth., Eric Gisse, 2006/05/11
  - Re: Once glance at the pump prices and you know what the dollar is ..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/11
    - Who's profiting ? How did they manage to do what OPEC couldn't ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Who's profiting ? How did they manage to do what OPEC couldn't ?, T Wake, 2006/05/12
Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/10
- Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/10
  - Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/11
Even More on BILLY MEIER & EXTRATERRESTRIALS -- Major Media Conspiracy Against Truth ----> Just like 911 Gov't Hoax & Man as Old as Coal <----, Ed Conrad, 2006/05/10
- Even More on BILLY MEIER & EXTRATERRESTRIALS -- Major Media Conspiracy Against Truth ----> Just like 911 Gov't Hoax & Man as Old as Coal <----, Ed Conrad, 2006/05/10
Plasma and fusion power, isaackoi2, 2006/05/10
- Re: Plasma and fusion power, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/10
  - Re: Plasma and fusion power, isaackoi2, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Plasma and fusion power, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Plasma and fusion power, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Plasma and fusion power, The Real Chris, 2006/05/11
Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, hetware, 2006/05/10
- Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, CWatters, 2006/05/10
  - Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, hetware, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, CWatters, 2006/05/13
- Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/10
- Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/12
- Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, tadchem, 2006/05/12
  - Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/12
    - Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, tadchem, 2006/05/13
hell, ma1ibu, 2006/05/10
- Re: hell, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/10
  - Re: hell, ma1ibu, 2006/05/11
collision, Gunnar G, 2006/05/10
- Re: collision, PD, 2006/05/10
- Re: collision, puppet_sock, 2006/05/10
- Re: collision, mmeron, 2006/05/10
  - Re: collision, briggs, 2006/05/11
- Re: collision, Thomas Smid, 2006/05/11
Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/10
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Igor, 2006/05/10
  - Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Igor, 2006/05/11
  - Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Golden Boar, 2006/05/24
    - Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Golden Boar, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Golden Boar, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Golden Boar, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/28
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/10
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, franklinhu, 2006/05/11
  - Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, T Wake, 2006/05/12
  - Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Igor, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Golden Boar, 2006/05/24
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, PD, 2006/05/11
  - Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, PD, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, PD, 2006/05/12
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/12
  - Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 2006/05/24
Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 2006/05/10
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/10
  - Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Force of my car crash?, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, Randy Poe, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, Randy Poe, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, srp, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Force of my car crash?, briggs, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, briggs, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, briggs, 2006/05/10
- Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 2006/05/10
  - Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Force of my car crash?, pete, 2006/05/15
- Re: Force of my car crash?, srp, 2006/05/10
  - Re: Force of my car crash?, briggs, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Force of my car crash?, srp, 2006/05/10
  - Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 2006/05/10
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Greg Neill, 2006/05/10
  - Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Force of my car crash?, Greg Neill, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, Greg Neill, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 2006/05/11
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/10
  - Re: Force of my car crash?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/12
    - Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Force of my car crash?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/15
- Re: Force of my car crash?, CWatters, 2006/05/10
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/12
MORE ON BILLY MEIER and the Henoch Prophecies -- Extraterrestrials -- UFOs, Ed Conrad, 2006/05/10
"Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Eht, 2006/05/10
ED CONRAD WILL WIN IN THE LONG RUN -- 1996 Prediction Coming True -- Evolution Going Belly Up -- Man as Old as Coal, Ed Conrad, 2006/05/10
Re: Vast Active Living Intelligence? VALIS, donstockbauer, 2006/05/10
- Re: Vast Active Living Intelligence? VALIS, greysky, 2006/05/10
Absolute zero and fundamental particles ?, Phas, 2006/05/10
- Re: Absolute zero and fundamental particles ?, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/10
- Re: Absolute zero and fundamental particles ?, mmeron, 2006/05/10
- Re: Absolute zero and fundamental particles ?, srp, 2006/05/10
tripin around the universe, dedanoe, 2006/05/10
- Re: tripin around the universe, Dr. Planckenstein, 2006/05/11
  - Re: tripin around the universe, dedanoe, 2006/05/11
Re: "America, you lost. ... I won.", donstockbauer, 2006/05/09
Re: The proof of mass vector., yen, ka-in, 2006/05/09
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2006/05/29
  - Re: The proof of mass vector., Golden Boar, 2006/05/29
OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Know edge, 2006/05/09
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Know edge, 2006/05/09
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), BernardZ, 2006/05/10
  - Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Know edge, 2006/05/10
    - Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Harry, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Know edge, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Harry, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), tdp1001, 2006/05/11
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), jhnrmsdn, 2006/05/10
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), eleaticus, 2006/05/10
  - Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Know edge, 2006/05/12
Gauss's Law, Nishu, 2006/05/09
- Re: Gauss's Law, PD, 2006/05/09
- Re: Gauss's Law, mmeron, 2006/05/09
history of physics, Gunnar G, 2006/05/09
- Re: history of physics, PD, 2006/05/09
- Re: history of physics, Greg Neill, 2006/05/10
Has anybody else been abducted by aliens?, tripod, 2006/05/09
- Re: Has anybody else been abducted by aliens?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
Standard Model versus A Guage as the Angle, assanreality@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/09
WEHT: Uncle Al, John Schutkeker, 2006/05/09
- Re: WEHT: Uncle Al, ma1ibu, 2006/05/09
- Re: Uncle Al, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Uncle Al, John Schutkeker, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Uncle Al, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Uncle Al, Richard Herring, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Uncle Al, ma1ibu, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Uncle Al, john, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Uncle Al, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/12
concentration sensor uing UV light, Andrew, 2006/05/09
- Re: concentration sensor uing UV light, CWatters, 2006/05/09
  - Re: concentration sensor uing UV light, tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
- Re: concentration sensor uing UV light, john, 2006/05/12
particles = probabilities ?, Dr. Planckenstein, 2006/05/09
- Re: particles = probabilities ?, mushnik, 2006/05/09
  - Re: particles = probabilities ?, Dr. Planckenstein, 2006/05/09
- Message not available
  - Re: particles = probabilities ?, Dr. Planckenstein, 2006/05/10
"The Matter of "Dark Matter", Eht, 2006/05/09
Precession and Evolution, klaudiozic, 2006/05/09
- Re: Precession and Evolution, Sven Hesse, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Precession and Evolution, donstockbauer, 2006/05/09
- Re: Precession and Evolution, mushnik, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Precession and Evolution, Helios http://members.fortunecity.com/juillet, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Precession and Evolution, klaudiozic, 2006/05/23
The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/09
  - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
    - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, faceless, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, guskz, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, guskz, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, guskz, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, mmeron, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 2006/05/14
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/09
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Harry, 2006/05/09
  - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
    - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Harry, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Harry, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 2006/05/10
    - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/10
      
      errata; was Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/15
    - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
    - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/09
  - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
  - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/14
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, faceless, 2006/05/09
  - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/09
    - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Josef Matz, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/12
    - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/10
  - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Josef Matz, 2006/05/12
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 2006/05/09
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, snapdragon31, 2006/05/09
  - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/10
  - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/10
    - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, snapdragon31, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/12
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/09
  - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/09
    - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 2006/05/11
  - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/10
  - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 2006/05/11
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 2006/05/09
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/10
  - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 2006/05/10
    - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, rangeravenger, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, rangeravenger, 2006/05/18
    - Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, rangeravenger, 2006/05/18
Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/09
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Newton's G (new), Harry, 2006/05/11
    - Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/11
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), Sue..., 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), Sue..., 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), Henry Haapalainen, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), Henry Haapalainen, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), Henry Haapalainen, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), John C . Polasek, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/18
    - Re: Newton's G (new), Richard Schultz, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 2006/05/11
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38.2 Orientation Toward Change in Elasticity, Springs, Strings, Riccati, OsherD, 2006/05/09
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38.2 Orientation Toward Change in Elasticity, Springs, Strings, Riccati, OsherD, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38.2 Orientation Toward Change in Elasticity, Springs, Strings, Riccati, OsherD, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38.2 Orientation Toward Change in Elasticity, Springs, Strings, Riccati, john, 2006/05/10
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38.2 Orientation Toward Change in Elasticity, Springs, Strings, Riccati, john, 2006/05/10
carbon ring, ma1ibu, 2006/05/09
- Re: carbon ring, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
  - Re: carbon ring, ma1ibu, 2006/05/09
    - Re: carbon ring, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: carbon ring, ma1ibu, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: carbon ring, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/10
Re: Energy slows down clocks., John C . Polasek, 2006/05/08
Interaction term in the field Lagrangian, roman, 2006/05/08
plankton-sized bits of plastic, ma1ibu, 2006/05/08
- Re: plankton-sized bits of plastic, donstockbauer, 2006/05/08
Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, MobyDikc, 2006/05/08
- Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, Randy Poe, 2006/05/08
  - Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, MobyDikc, 2006/05/08
  - Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/09
    - Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
- Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs i..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/08
  - Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs i..., Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/10
- Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, tadchem, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, MobyDikc, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, tadchem, 2006/05/10
Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, Dave (from the UK), 2006/05/08
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, rotchm, 2006/05/08
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, arvee, 2006/05/08
  - Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, mmeron, 2006/05/08
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, mushnik, 2006/05/08
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, Quantum_Ranger, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, CWatters, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, rotchm, 2006/05/09
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, tadchem, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, tadchem, 2006/05/10
thermodynamics, Ian Lazarus, 2006/05/08
- Re: thermodynamics, OG, 2006/05/08
  - Re: thermodynamics, Ian Lazarus, 2006/05/09
    - Re: thermodynamics, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/09
    - Re: thermodynamics, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
    - Re: thermodynamics, OG, 2006/05/09
- Re: thermodynamics, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
- Re: thermodynamics, CWatters, 2006/05/09
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38.1: Fokker-Planck Equation, OsherD, 2006/05/08
Astrophysics is stellar type of Magnetism, dedanoe, 2006/05/08
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38: Orientation Toward Change (Derivatives), OsherD, 2006/05/08
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38: Orientation Toward Change (Derivatives), OsherD, 2006/05/08
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38: Orientation Toward Change (Derivatives), john, 2006/05/09
More useful emotograms, John Schutkeker, 2006/05/08
- Re: More useful emotograms, tadchem, 2006/05/08
  - Re: More useful emotograms, John Schutkeker, 2006/05/09
  - Re: More useful emotograms, John Schutkeker, 2006/05/09
    - Re: More useful emotograms, tadchem, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: More useful emotograms, John Schutkeker, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: More useful emotograms, Michael Gray, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: More useful emotograms, tadchem, 2006/05/11
New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks simple. This true?, Spike, 2006/05/08
- Re: New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks simple. This true?, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/08
- Re: New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks simple. This true?, CWatters, 2006/05/08
- Re: New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks simple. This true?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/08
  - Re: New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks sim..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/08
  - Re: New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks sim..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/08
- Re: New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks simple. This true?, Paul Cardinale, 2006/05/09
UK UFO free, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/08
- Re: UK UFO free, AlexJones, 2006/05/08
Dewey B. Larson, ma1ibu, 2006/05/08
- Dewey B. Larson, ma1ibu, 2006/05/08
  - Re: Dewey B. Larson, ma1ibu, 2006/05/08
    - Re: Dewey B. Larson, ma1ibu, 2006/05/08
before life and after death, dedanoe, 2006/05/08
- Re: before life and after death, Rushtown, 2006/05/08
  - Re: before life and after death, rationalist, 2006/05/08
    - Re: before life and after death, Felix Rawlings, 2006/05/08
    - Re: before life and after death, Rushtown, 2006/05/08
- Re: before life and after death, rationalist, 2006/05/08
AN APOLOGY TO ELVIS THE PELVIS -- Mistaken Identify -- Alas, It's Not His Gas -- The King Sighted in Wal-Mart, Ed Conrad, 2006/05/08
administer dedanoe's impact, dedanoe, 2006/05/08
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 08, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2006/05/08
Looking for Pierre Curie, Bits, 2006/05/08
Michael Faraday - world of biography, Bits, 2006/05/08
Partitions and Invariances of the Universe, OsherD, 2006/05/08
- Re: Partitions and Invariances of the Universe, OsherD, 2006/05/08
  - Re: Partitions and Invariances of the Universe, OsherD, 2006/05/08
- Re: Partitions and Invariances of the Universe, AlexJones, 2006/05/08
Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 2006/05/08
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 2006/05/23
  - Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities, donstockbauer, 2006/05/23
(SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 2006/05/08
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 2006/05/23
Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 2006/05/08
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 2006/05/23
Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 2006/05/08
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 2006/05/23
Energy debt and Energy Credit, acctope, 2006/05/07
- Re: Energy debt and Energy Credit, Paul Cardinale, 2006/05/08
Spacelike singularity of non-rotating black hole, Jack Sarfatti, 2006/05/07
Re: PRIZES GALORE -- Identify the Evolutionist -- NO GAS CRISIS -- ..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
Re: RUSH LIMBAUGH NOT THE GAS-PRODUCING EVOLUTIONIST WHALE -- A Pub..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
Article: On the Light of the First Stars, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2006/05/07
Question about General Relativity, lugita15, 2006/05/07
- Re: Question about General Relativity, srp, 2006/05/07
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, lugita15, 2006/05/07
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/07
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, lugita15, 2006/05/07
    - Re: Question about General Relativity, Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/07
    - Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/09
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 2006/05/07
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/07
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/07
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/07
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/08
    - Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, T Wake, 2006/05/12
    - Re: Question about General Relativity, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/08
    - Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/12
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 2006/05/08
    - Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Richard Herring, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Richard Herring, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Richard Herring, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Richard Herring, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Richard Herring, 2006/05/18
    - Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/21
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/08
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 2006/05/08
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 2006/05/08
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Mike, 2006/05/08
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/09
    - Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/10
- Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 2006/05/08
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, Mike, 2006/05/09
    - Re: Question about General Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Mike, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Mike, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Mike, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Mike, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/11
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/12
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 2006/05/13
    - Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 2006/05/17
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 2006/05/17
- Re: Question about General Relativity, actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/14
  - Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 2006/05/15
Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, OsherD, 2006/05/07
- Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, OsherD, 2006/05/07
  - Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, OsherD, 2006/05/07
    - Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, OsherD, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, Sum One Dumb, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, Quantum_Ranger, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, Quantum_Ranger, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/07
    - Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, Alex Jones, 2006/05/07
"Gravity", Eht, 2006/05/07
- Re: "Gravity", The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/07
  - Re: "Gravity", Hexenmeister, 2006/05/07
    - Re: "Gravity", The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/07
dying to live or dying to know -- unification, dedanoe, 2006/05/07
Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/07
- Really the same idiot., Hexenmeister, 2006/05/07
  - Re: Really the same idiot., Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/07
- Re: Really a different thread., Prometheus, 2006/05/07
  - Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/07
    - Re: Really a different thread., Prometheus, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Prometheus, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Hexenmeister, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Prometheus, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Prometheus, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Really a different thread., Hexenmeister, 2006/05/09
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 37: Boundary is Fundamental, OsherD, 2006/05/07
Proof of P(A-->B-->C) - P(A<-->B<-->C) = P(A' C) in Response to the Troll, OsherD, 2006/05/07
Re: twin paradox for simple minds., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/06
- Re: twin paradox for simple minds., Eric Gisse, 2006/05/06
  - Re: twin paradox for simple minds., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/07
    - Re: twin paradox for simple minds., Hexenmeister, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: twin paradox for simple minds., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: twin paradox for simple minds., Eric Gisse, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: twin paradox for simple minds., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/08
- Re: twin paradox for simple minds., Hexenmeister, 2006/05/07
  - Re: twin paradox for simple minds., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/07
Re: CHARGE! CHARGE!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/06
- Re: CHARGE! CHARGE!, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/07
  - Re: CHARGE! CHARGE!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/07
On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, yinbing-zhou, 2006/05/06
- On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, yinbing-zhou, 2006/05/24
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 36: Recency and Primacy in Physics and Psychology, OsherD, 2006/05/06
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 36: Recency and Primacy in Physics and Psychology, OsherD, 2006/05/06
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 36: Recency and Primacy in Physics and Psychology, Allex Jones, 2006/05/06
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 36: Recency and Primacy in Physics and Psychology, OsherD, 2006/05/07
    - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 36: Recency and Primacy in Physics and Psychology, OsherD, 2006/05/07
Article: Up and Down, but Not Strange, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2006/05/06
- Re: Article: Up and Down, but Not Strange, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/06
you don't have a thing fund-a-mental in your physics, dedanoe, 2006/05/06
- Re: you don't have a thing fund-a-mental in your physics, dedanoe, 2006/05/06
why umbrella black in colour, mushtaq, 2006/05/06
- Re: why umbrella black in colour, cnctut, 2006/05/06
- Re: why umbrella black in colour, CWatters, 2006/05/06
- Re: why umbrella black in colour, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/06
- Re: why umbrella black in colour, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/06
  - Re: why umbrella black in colour, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/06
  - Re: why umbrella black in colour, tadchem, 2006/05/06
- Re: why umbrella black in colour, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/06
Elementary Thermodynamics question, Boo, 2006/05/06
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, cnctut, 2006/05/06
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, Edward Green, 2006/05/06
  - Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, Sum One Dumb, 2006/05/06
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, Sum One Dumb, 2006/05/06
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, tadchem, 2006/05/06
  - Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, cnctut, 2006/05/06
    - Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, tadchem, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, cnctut, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, tadchem, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, cnctut, 2006/05/08
- Things dissipate... the universe is cooling., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/07
"Memory" effects of a spinning disk, top9, 2006/05/06
- Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, tadchem, 2006/05/06
  - Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, top9, 2006/05/07
    - Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, top9, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, realist, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, realist, 2006/05/13
  - Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, CWatters, 2006/05/07
"Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Eht, 2006/05/06
anal orgy analogy, dedanoe, 2006/05/06
try dedanoe's experiment, dedanoe, 2006/05/06
- Re: try dedanoe's experiment, Sum One Dumb, 2006/05/06
Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/06
- Re: Experiment#1, Sum One Dumb, 2006/05/06
- Re: Experiment#1, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/06
- Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 2006/05/06
- Re: Experiment#1, CWatters, 2006/05/06
  - Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/06
    - Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Experiment#1, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 2006/05/07
- Re: Experiment#1, OG, 2006/05/07
  - Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/10
    - Re: Experiment#1, OG, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Experiment#1, OG, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Experiment#1, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Experiment#1, OG, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Experiment#1, mmeron, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, mmeron, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, OG, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, Greg Neill, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, Greg Neill, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, mmeron, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, PD, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Experiment#1, mmeron, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Experiment#1, mmeron, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Experiment#1, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Experiment#1, mmeron, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: Experiment#1, jmfbahciv, 2006/05/19
    - Re: Experiment#1, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/13
- Re: Experiment#1, Michael Gray, 2006/05/09
  - Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 2006/05/10
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 35: Holographic Principle and Perception, OsherD, 2006/05/06
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 35: Holographic Principle and Perception, OsherD, 2006/05/06
electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, a_plutonium, 2006/05/06
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Surfer, 2006/05/06
  - Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Herman Family, 2006/05/06
    - Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Herman Family, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/07
  - size of ITER vs. JET and Fusion Barrier Principle Re: electric versus petrol mowers, a_plutonium, 2006/05/06
    - Re: size of ITER vs. JET and Fusion Barrier Principle Re: electric versus petrol mowers, a_plutonium, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: size of ITER vs. JET and Fusion Barrier Principle Re: electric versus petrol mowers, a_plutonium, 2006/05/07
  - Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/07
    - Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Herman Family, 2006/05/07
    - Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Paul E. Bennett, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol homeheating, T Wake, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, tadchem, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, The Sorcerer, 2006/05/28
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, CWatters, 2006/05/06
  - Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Everett M. Greene, 2006/05/27
PRECISION MICROEXPLOSIONS, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/05
Cyclic universe could explain cosmological constant?, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/05
- Re: Cyclic universe could explain cosmological constant?, Bruce Scott TOK, 2006/05/07
Time constant calculation for proton and electron, Jerry, 2006/05/05
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 May 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/05
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 May 06 Washington, DC, Andy Resnick, 2006/05/08
Should OneStonian Wear A Special Hat?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
- Re: Should OneStonian Wear A Special Hat?, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/05
The Moon has plentiful oxygen, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/05
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, Allex Jones, 2006/05/05
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, Uncle Al, 2006/05/05
  - Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, tj Frazir, 2006/05/06
    - Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, jimp, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, Brad Guth, 2006/05/08
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, Brad Guth, 2006/05/08
HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, clitteigh, 2006/05/05
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Steve Dufour, 2006/05/05
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 2006/05/05
  - Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 2006/05/05
    - Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Balios, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, walksalone, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 2006/05/18
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 2006/05/07
- Big bang metaphysics., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/06
  - Re: Big bang metaphysics., T Wake, 2006/05/12
Electron affinity for semiconducting oxides, JAH, 2006/05/05
Hottest topic in physics, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/05
- Re: Hottest topic in physics, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/05
  - Re: Hottest topic in physics, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
Cool Physics site, foertter, 2006/05/05
Re: pressure from airspeed, drag calculation, Richard Herring, 2006/05/05
I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/05
  - Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
    - Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
    - Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, T Wake, 2006/05/05
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Julian Becker, 2006/05/05
"Examining Mathematical Approaches", Eht, 2006/05/05
ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, Ed Conrad, 2006/05/05
- Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, antixdaxvincixcode@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/05
- Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 2006/05/06
  - Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, Sum One Dumb, 2006/05/06
    - Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, Leon, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 2006/05/07
    - Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 2006/05/06
dying to live?, dedanoe, 2006/05/05
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 34: Toward a Probability Drive, OsherD, 2006/05/05
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 33: Multiverse Works For Probability in a Sense, OsherD, 2006/05/05
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 32: 3- vs 4-dimensional Bianchi and Confinement, OsherD, 2006/05/05
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 32: 3- vs 4-dimensional Bianchi and Confinement, OsherD, 2006/05/05
Paper: The Vacuum Energy Crisis, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2006/05/05
- Re: Paper: The Vacuum Energy Crisis, dda1, 2006/05/05
Paper: Why the Cosmological Constant Is Small and Positive, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2006/05/05
- Re: Paper: Why the Cosmological Constant Is Small and Positive, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 2006/05/05
Atoms on the move, Bertromavich, 2006/05/05
Which Way Information For Dummies., Sum One Dumb, 2006/05/04
- Re: Which Way Information For Dummies., Greg Neill, 2006/05/05
  - Re: Which Way Information For Dummies., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/05
- Re: Which Way Information For Dummies., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/05
  - DONT READ THIS Re: Which Way Information For Dummies., Sum One Dumb, 2006/05/05
    - Steal This Book, Sum One Dumb, 2006/05/06
      
      Please credit me 1 mitzvah, and I will repay you by eradicating the mathematical meshugas., Sum One Dumb, 2006/05/06
      
      OK, so my credit is bad. I'll give you a couple points on the interest, just look at the downpayment. C'mon., Sum One Dumb, 2006/05/06
Re: Calculating the Lorentz factor when v >= c, Eric Gisse, 2006/05/04
electron magnetic moment numbers from Feynman's QED book?, Jolly, 2006/05/04
Mystery Sand on Saturn Moon - Titan, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/04
- Re: Mystery Sand on Saturn Moon - Titan, tadchem, 2006/05/07
THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION -- It's a Real Gasser..., Ed Conrad, 2006/05/04
- Re: THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION -- It's a Real Gasser..., Darkwing, 2006/05/04
- Re: THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION -- It's a Real Gasser..., Chadwick Stone�, 2006/05/05
  - Re: THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION -- It's a Real Gasser..., Kurt, 2006/05/05
- Re: THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION -- It's a Real Gasser..., John Griffin, 2006/05/07
Ice freezes at room temperature, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/04
spectral density/Johnson noise, Carlos Romero, 2006/05/04
- Re: spectral density/Johnson noise, Allex Jones, 2006/05/04
  - Re: spectral density/Johnson noise, Carlos Romero, 2006/05/05
    - Re: spectral density/Johnson noise, Andy Resnick, 2006/05/05
    - Re: spectral density/Johnson noise, Edward Green, 2006/05/07
- Re: spectral density/Johnson noise, Bertromavich, 2006/05/05
  - Re: spectral density/Johnson noise, Allex Jones, 2006/05/05
Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/04
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Edward Green, 2006/05/07
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/04
  - Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/04
    - Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, mmeron, 2006/05/04
    - Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, timo, 2006/05/14
    - Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Edward Green, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Timo A. Nieminen, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, mmeron, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, mmeron, 2006/05/07
  - Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Edward Green, 2006/05/05
    - Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Edward Green, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/06
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/06
  - Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/07
    - Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Edward Green, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Edward Green, 2006/05/13
plasma question, mkogan, 2006/05/04
- Re: plasma question, AverageDude, 2006/05/04
- Re: plasma question, Allex Jones, 2006/05/04
  - Re: plasma question, mkogan, 2006/05/12
Net Neutrality, Uncle Al, 2006/05/04
- Re: Net Neutrality, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/04
  - Re: Net Neutrality, anyone . santos, 2006/05/04
  - Re: Net Neutrality, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/05
    - Re: Net Neutrality, Bilge, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Net Neutrality, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Net Neutrality, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Net Neutrality, Schoenfeld, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Net Neutrality, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
    - Re: Net Neutrality, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
    - Re: Net Neutrality, Igor, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Net Neutrality, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/05
- Re: Net Neutrality, Rene Tschaggelar, 2006/05/04
leSage gravity source?, ma1ibu, 2006/05/04
- Re: leSage gravity source?, ma1ibu, 2006/05/04
Schrödinger equation., Sunny123, 2006/05/04
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Mirror Space, 2006/05/04
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Thomas Smid, 2006/05/04
  - Re: Schrödinger equation., Sunny123, 2006/05/04
  - Re: Schrödinger equation., Thomas Smid, 2006/05/06
  - Re: Schrödinger equation., Thomas Smid, 2006/05/06
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Eli Kraisler, 2006/05/04
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Greg Hansen, 2006/05/06
  - Re: Schrödinger equation., Thomas Smid, 2006/05/06
  - Re: Schrödinger equation., Thomas Smid, 2006/05/06
    - Re: Schrödinger equation., Sunny123, 2006/05/06
- Re: Schrödinger equation., tadchem, 2006/05/06
Money means nothing to me., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/04
- Re: Money means nothing to me., T Wake, 2006/05/04
  - It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/05
    - Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., Eric Gisse, 2006/05/05
    - Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., Eric Gisse, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., Eric Gisse, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., T Wake, 2006/05/05
    - Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., tj Frazir, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun atall., T Wake, 2006/05/05
Why doesn't the electron fall on the proton in the L=0 states?, Tareq, 2006/05/04
- Re: Why doesn't the electron fall on the proton in the L=0 states?, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/04
  - Re: Why doesn't the electron fall on the proton in the L=0 states?, Tareq, 2006/05/05
    - Re: Why doesn't the electron fall on the proton in the L=0 states?, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Why doesn't the electron fall on the proton in the L=0 states?, freezer, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: Why doesn't the electron fall on the proton in the L=0 states?, freezer, 2006/05/06
you say your GOD is almighty?, dedanoe, 2006/05/04
- Re: you say your GOD is almighty?, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/05/04
- Re: you say your GOD is almighty?, Tony Orlow, 2006/05/04
- Re: you say your GOD is almighty?, kogs, 2006/05/10
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!THE BONE MARROW OF assignment::::::::::::FUNCTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS B�RJESSON, 2006/05/04
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 31: The Feedback-Nonfeedback Boundary and Initial-Terminal-Inside-Outside-Boundaries, OsherD, 2006/05/04
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 31: The Feedback-Nonfeedback Boundary and Initial-Terminal-Inside-Outside-Boundaries, donstockbauer, 2006/05/04
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 31: The Feedback-Nonfeedback Boundary and Initial-Terminal-Inside-Outside-Boundaries, Allex Jones, 2006/05/04
I did it!, osdfey, 2006/05/04
- Re: I did it!, Mike, 2006/05/04
  - Re: I did it!, dedanoe, 2006/05/04
    - Re: I did it!, Mike, 2006/05/04
- Re: I did it!, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/04
- Re: I did it!, greysky, 2006/05/04
  - Re: I did it!, T Wake, 2006/05/04
- Re: I did it!, PD, 2006/05/04
- Re: I did it!, T Wake, 2006/05/04
- Re: I did it!, PD, 2006/05/04
- Re: I did it!, PD, 2006/05/04
- Re: I did it!, PD, 2006/05/04
- Re: I did it!, PD, 2006/05/04
- Re: I did it!, PD, 2006/05/04
  - Re: I did it!, T Wake, 2006/05/04
- Re: I did it!, PD, 2006/05/04
Reviews, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/03
WMAP data put cosmic inflation to the test, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/03
Polymers that conduct electricity are now of huge interest, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/03
Electric field Integration, Nishu, 2006/05/03
- Re: Electric field Integration, Timo Nieminen, 2006/05/03
- Re: Electric field Integration, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/04
aligned galaxies, ma1ibu, 2006/05/03
- Re: aligned galaxies, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/04
  - Re: aligned galaxies, ma1ibu, 2006/05/05
    - Re: aligned galaxies, ma1ibu, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: aligned galaxies, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: aligned galaxies, ma1ibu, 2006/05/06
Re: Is platonism in math correct?, sketch . system, 2006/05/03
- Re: Is platonism in math correct?, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/05/03
  - Re: Is platonism in math correct?, Jan Burse, 2006/05/03
    - Re: Is platonism in math correct?, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/05/04
- Re: Is platonism in math correct?, will.harris@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/04
  - Re: Is platonism in math correct?, Fredrik Bulow, 2006/05/04
    - Re: Is platonism in math correct?, juanpool@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/04
curses, kstocklmeir, 2006/05/03
- curses, kstocklmeir, 2006/05/03
- curses, kstocklmeir, 2006/05/03
- curses, kstocklmeir, 2006/05/03
- curses, kstocklmeir, 2006/05/03
- curses, kstocklmeir, 2006/05/05
  - Re: curses, donstockbauer, 2006/05/05
- curses, kstocklmeir, 2006/05/06
- curses, kstocklmeir, 2006/05/06
  - Re: curses, Richard Herring, 2006/05/08
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/09
  - Re: curses, T Wake, 2006/05/12
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/13
  - Re: curses, T Wake, 2006/05/13
    - Re: curses, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/16
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/14
  - Re: curses, T Wake, 2006/05/14
  - Re: curses, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/16
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/15
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/15
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/16
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/17
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/21
  - Re: curses, Richard Herring, 2006/05/22
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/21
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/21
  - Re: curses, Bert Hickman, 2006/05/21
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/23
  - Re: curses, T Wake, 2006/05/23
    - Re: curses, Richard Tobin, 2006/05/23
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/24
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/24
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/24
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/24
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/24
  - Re: curses, T Wake, 2006/05/24
    - Re: curses, donstockbauer, 2006/05/24
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/25
  - Re: curses, T Wake, 2006/05/25
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/27
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/28
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/28
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/28
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/29
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/29
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 2006/05/29
Why I believe in Athiesm., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/05/03
- Re: Why I believe in Athiesm., Fahad Alhasan, 2006/05/03
- Re: Why we do not care., Martin Hogbin, 2006/05/04
  - Re: Why we do not care., Vince, 2006/05/04
    - Re: Why we do not care., Bob, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: Why we do not care., Vince, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: Why we do not care., R. Pierce Butler, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Why we do not care., Vince, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Why we do not care., Bob, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Why we do not care., Vince, 2006/05/05
- Re: Why I believe in Athiesm., Rene Tschaggelar, 2006/05/04
  - Re: Why I believe in Athiesm., Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/05
  - Why I am an Athiest, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/05/05
    - Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Bob, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Bob, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Bob, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Bob, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Why I am an Athiest, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/05/11
Q Re light, Danny, 2006/05/03
- Re: Q Re light, PD, 2006/05/03
- Re: Q Re light, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/03
A question about ergodicity., kjd_72, 2006/05/03
- Re: A question about ergodicity., puppet_sock, 2006/05/03
  - Re: A question about ergodicity., kjd_72, 2006/05/03
"The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of, Eht, 2006/05/03
- Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of, donstockbauer, 2006/05/03
- "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of, Eht, 2006/05/04
Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/03
- Re: Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., tj Frazir, 2006/05/03
  - Re: Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., Randy Poe, 2006/05/03
    - Re: Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., tj Frazir, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., Randy Poe, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., Randy Poe, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., T Wake, 2006/05/04
  - T.J., This moon thing of yours is a big ruse, not your _Real_ issue., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/03
    - Sober_Minded_Metaphysics, -- e.g. going beyond the Lambda_CDM model., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: Sober_Minded_Metaphysics, -- e.g. going beyond the Lambda_CDM model., T Wake, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: Sober_Minded_Metaphysics, -- e.g. going beyond the Lambda_CDM m..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/03
    - Re: T.J., This moon thing of yours is a big ruse, not your _Real_ issue., T Wake, 2006/05/03
    - Re: T.J., This moon thing of yours is a big ruse, not your _Real_ i..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/03
Re: Thanks a lot, f_cker., Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/03
Re: Critical size (or Mass?) of the particle at which Macro transitions to Micro (Ref: Double Slit Experiment), Ravindra, 2006/05/03
- Re: Critical size (or Mass?) of the particle at which Macro transitions to Micro (Ref: Double Slit Experiment), Materion, 2006/05/07
- Re: Critical size (or Mass?) of the particle at which Macro transitions to Micro (Ref: Double Slit Experiment), Materion, 2006/05/07
  - Re: Critical size (or Mass?) of the particle at which Macro transitions to Micro (Ref: Double Slit Experiment), Ravindra, 2006/05/08
Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Herb Martin, 2006/05/03
- Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, PD, 2006/05/03
  - Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Herb Martin, 2006/05/03
- Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Nathan Urban, 2006/05/03
  - Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Herb Martin, 2006/05/03
    - Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Nathan Urban, 2006/05/04
- Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Bob Cain, 2006/05/06
  - Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Herb Martin, 2006/05/06
T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/03
- Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, T Wake, 2006/05/03
  - Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/04
    - Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, T Wake, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, Randy Poe, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/05
      
      Although I post my aliased email address all over the place, I never get spam., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Although I post my aliased email address all over the place, I ..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Although I post my aliased email address all over the place, I..., T Wake, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Although I post my aliased email address all over the place, I never get spam., T Wake, 2006/05/12
    - I see homeless people camping all over the place... thank you Seattle., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/08
- Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/03
  - Really T.J., you're such a Luddite., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/04
    - T.J., I'm just getting started, going slow at first., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: T.J., I'm just getting started, going slow at first., tj Frazir, 2006/05/04
      
      I need one _Big_ seller., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: I need one _Big_ seller., Randy Poe, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: I need one _Big_ seller., jimp, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: I need one _Big_ seller., T Wake, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: I need one _Big_ seller., tj Frazir, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: I need one _Big_ seller., tj Frazir, 2006/05/04
      
      Fame and wealth is also about _Who_ Votes_For/Pays you., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Fame and wealth is also about _Who_ Votes_For/Pays you., T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I need one _Big_ seller., T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., Randy Poe, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., jimp, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Scrap copper is only $ 1.30 to $ 1.80 a pound., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., T Wake, 2006/05/06
      
      Mr. Steve Liu of the Ningbo HongLing Factory in Ningbo., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/06
      
      Steve Liu, Aluminum_Ingots.JPG, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: Steve Liu, Aluminum_Ingots.JPG, tj Frazir, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: Steve Liu, Aluminum_Ingots.JPG, tj Frazir, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: Steve Liu, Aluminum_Ingots.JPG, tj Frazir, 2006/05/06
      
      I quoted Liu 65 cents, he's in Ningbo China., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: I quoted Liu 65 cents, he's in Ningbo China., tj Frazir, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: I quoted Liu 65 cents, he's in Ningbo China., tj Frazir, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: I quoted Liu 65 cents, he's in Ningbo China., tj Frazir, 2006/05/06
      
      I'm waiting on Steve Liu's quote... how much, and at what price., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: I'm waiting on Steve Liu's quote... how much, and at what price., tj Frazir, 2006/05/06
      
      Steve Liu wants 1.38 a pound., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: Steve Liu wants 1.38 a pound., tj Frazir, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: I quoted Liu 65 cents, he's in Ningbo China., tj Frazir, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: I quoted Liu 65 cents, he's in Ningbo China., tj Frazir, 2006/05/06
      
      I'm still quite clueless., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: I'm still quite clueless., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      I've yet to scope out the aluminum ingot market., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: I've yet to scope out the aluminum ingot market., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: I've yet to scope out the aluminum ingot market., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: I've yet to scope out the aluminum ingot market., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      How do I price scrap ? Always 25 cents ? The quality varies a lot., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: How do I price scrap ? Always 25 cents ? The quality varies a..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: How do I price scrap ? Always 25 cents ? The quality varies ..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Offered Hisham El Feky 60 cents for clean scrap, FOB., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/08
      
      Wonsik Park, Wooshin Metal Co., Ltd., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Wonsik Park, Wooshin Metal Co., Ltd., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Wonsik Park, Wooshin Metal Co., Ltd., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Wonsik Park, Wooshin Metal Co., Ltd., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Yusov Ivan of Ancuver in Vladivostok., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: Yusov Ivan of Ancuver in Vladivostok., tj Frazir, 2006/05/07
      
      Aluminum prices., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Aluminum prices., tj Frazir, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Aluminum prices. $ 50 MUSD science in motion, tj Frazir, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Aluminum prices., tj Frazir, 2006/05/08
      
      ExIm.GOV wires cash to their account when we see your load on the boat., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/09
      
      The Yellow_Pages ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/09
      
      Ancuver, in the Russian Federation, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/07
      
      Nigel Trebell of the Eurotrade Partnership Ltd, U.K., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Nigel Trebell of the Eurotrade Partnership Ltd, U.K., tj Frazir, 2006/05/09
      
      Buying when the _Hard_ facts are right., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Buying when the _Hard_ facts are right., tj Frazir, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Buying when the _Hard_ facts are right., T Wake, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Steve Liu, Aluminum_Ingots.JPG, tdp1001, 2006/05/08
      
      Isn't it just a matter of reporting to the tax authorities ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Isn't it just a matter of reporting to the tax authorities ?, tdp1001, 2006/05/08
      
      I'm using the term Finders_Fee now... wink wink., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Isn't it just a matter of reporting to the tax authorities ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: Isn't it just a matter of reporting to the tax authorities ?, tdp1001, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Isn't it just a matter of reporting to the tax authorities ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: Isn't it just a matter of reporting to the tax authorities ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/09
      
      I think I'll need weeks, not days., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: I think I'll need weeks, not days., tj Frazir, 2006/05/09
      
      I'd try some _Filtered_ cigs with a fine pot/tobacco blend., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: I'd try some _Filtered_ cigs with a fine pot/tobacco blend., tj Frazir, 2006/05/10
      
      It isn't uncommon for Ethen to nab 4 Credit/Debit cards a day., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: It isn't uncommon for Ethen to nab 4 Credit/Debit cards a day., tj Frazir, 2006/05/10
      
      They couldn't do it without me., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: They couldn't do it without me., tj Frazir, 2006/05/11
      
      Yea... once to learn by doing., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      73.7 cents per pound of 99.5 % Aluminuam ingots in China., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: 73.7 cents per pound of 99.5 % Aluminuam ingots in China., tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Yea... once to learn by doing., tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Ved Moola, SBA-Global.COM., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      20 to 30 tons at 73.7 cents per pound of 99.5 % Aluminuam ingots in China., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      T.J., What should I tell a seller who agrees to my terms ? !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: T.J., What should I tell a seller who agrees to my terms ? !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      T.J., Won't I need to contact you _Immediately_ after I get the quote ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: T.J., Won't I need to contact you _Immediately_ after I get the quote ?, T Wake, 2006/05/12
      
      The outcome is assured., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The outcome is assured., T Wake, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: The outcome is assured., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: The outcome is assured., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      My wording., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: My wording., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      The bankers meeting in Beijing., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: The bankers meeting in Beijing., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      T.J. has something to say... T_Wake doesn't., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: T.J. has something to say... T_Wake doesn't., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: T.J. has something to say... T_Wake doesn't., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: T.J. has something to say... T_Wake doesn't., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: My wording., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Psychology is a softer science than Newtonian physics., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Psychology is a softer science than Newtonian physics., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Psychology is a softer science than Newtonian physics., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Psychology is a softer science than Newtonian physics., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Anne is checking her stock., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Anne is checking her stock., tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: They couldn't do it without me., PD, 2006/05/12
      
      I'm just so flattered., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: I'm just so flattered., PD, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: I'm just so flattered., tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, T Wake, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, T Wake, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      T.J. is Russian, Native_Alaskan, Candian and American... all at once., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: T.J. is Russian, Native_Alaskan, Candian and American... all at..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      FOB price for 60 thousand metric tonnes of aluminum ingots ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: FOB price for 60 thousand metric tonnes of aluminum ingots ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: FOB price for 60 thousand metric tonnes of aluminum ingots ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: FOB price for 60 thousand metric tonnes of aluminum ingots ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: FOB price for 60 thousand metric tonnes of aluminum ingots ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: T.J. is Russian, Native_Alaskan, Candian and American... all at..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: T.J. is Russian, Native_Alaskan, Candian and American... all at..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      35 K MT in China ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: 35 K MT in China ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Is Anne with EasTrans_Lines, www.EasTrans.COM.SG/Services.asp ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Is Anne with EasTrans_Lines, www.EasTrans.COM.SG/Services.asp ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: T.J. is Russian, Native_Alaskan, Candian and American... all at once., T Wake, 2006/05/12
      
      Anne wants to be paid before the shipping date., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Anne wants to be paid before the shipping date., tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Finding Anne's sellers., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Finding Anne's sellers., tj Frazir, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Finding Anne's sellers., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Finding Anne's sellers., jimp, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Finding Anne's sellers., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Are you _Forced_ to read only crap ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Are you _Forced_ to read only crap ?, T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., jimp, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      It didn't say if the price was in dollars or pounds sterling., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: It didn't say if the price was in dollars or pounds sterling., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Get a _Real_ job, idiot., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Get a _Real_ job, idiot., T Wake, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: It didn't say if the price was in dollars or pounds sterling., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: It didn't say if the price was in dollars or pounds sterling., T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., jimp, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., jimp, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., jimp, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Drawing fire from all sides., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Drawing fire from all sides., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      T.J. speaks the language of international trade., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
      
      Anne is an aluminum supplier, not a shipper., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Anne is an aluminum supplier, not a shipper., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Anne is an aluminum supplier, not a shipper., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      T.J., You found 60 thousand tons ? Where ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: T.J., You found 60 thousand tons ? Where ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Did T.J. dream it ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Did T.J. dream it ?, T Wake, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: Did T.J. dream it ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: T.J., You found 60 thousand tons ? Where ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Srivaths is a middle man, just like T.J. and me... he's our _Competitor_ !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Srivaths is a middle man, just like T.J. and me... he's our _Co..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Anne is an aluminum supplier, not a shipper., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      My proposed reply to Charles Hinton., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Anne is an aluminum supplier, not a shipper., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      We'll have to wait for Anne's quote and licensing... it'll take time., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We'll have to wait for Anne's quote and licensing... it'll take..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      Mike Mironenko of Parma Limited Co., Ltd, Parma-Limited.COM, Russia., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Mike Mironenko of Parma Limited Co., Ltd, Parma-Limited.COM, Ru..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Mike Mironenko of Parma Limited Co., Ltd, Parma-Limited.COM, Ru..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Mironenko only offered to sell a tenth of a metric tonne., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
      
      T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Hinton's 2 thousand MT of copper ingots at USD 3,920 per MT., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Hinton's 2 thousand MT of copper ingots at USD 3,920 per MT., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Hinton's 2 thousand MT of copper ingots at USD 3,920 per MT., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Hinton has only 1 thousand MT and wants a 10 percent deposit., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Hinton has only 1 thousand MT and wants a 10 percent deposit., Dr. Planckenstein, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Hinton has only 1 thousand MT and wants a 10 percent deposit., jimp, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Hinton has only 1 thousand MT and wants a 10 percent deposit., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      I'll work on finding the actual producers., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: I'll work on finding the actual producers., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Mr. Stanislav N in Vladivostok., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Mr. Stanislav N in Vladivostok., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Mr. Stanislav N in Vladivostok., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Hinton has only 1 thousand MT and wants a 10 percent deposit., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      T.J., after you edit this email, I'll send it out., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: T.J., after you edit this email, I'll send it out., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Hinton has only 1 thousand MT and wants a 10 percent deposit., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Looking for plants in Venezuela and Russia., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Looking for plants in Venezuela and Russia., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Bogoslovs Aluminium., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Bogoslovs Aluminium., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      T.J., I thought you wanted me to ask, just in case., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, T Wake, 2006/05/22
      
      T.J. is an über optimistic/enthusiastic hound dog., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: T.J. is an Ã¼ber optimistic/enthusiastic hound dog., tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: T.J. is an Ã¼ber optimistic/enthusiastic hound dog., tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      Deisel costs 89 cents a gallon ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Deisel costs 89 cents a gallon ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: Deisel costs 89 cents a gallon ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      A ton of deisel in America costs USD 1.24 a gallon., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A ton of deisel in America costs USD 1.24 a gallon., tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A ton of deisel in America costs USD 1.24 a gallon., tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      I couldn't be a sailor., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: I couldn't be a sailor., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: I couldn't be a sailor., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: I couldn't be a sailor., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Raman are 10 cents each and my food stamps pay for it., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: I couldn't be a sailor., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      They want a deposit up front., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: They want a deposit up front., Randy Poe, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: They want a deposit up front., jimp, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: They want a deposit up front., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Finding the producers in Russia and Venezuela., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Finding the producers in Russia and Venezuela., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      www.Genisim.QC.CA/aluminum/e_europe.htm., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: www.Genisim.QC.CA/aluminum/e_europe.htm., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: www.Genisim.QC.CA/aluminum/e_europe.htm., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      I've now made over 20 offers to buy !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: I've now made over 20 offers to buy !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: I've now made over 20 offers to buy !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: I've now made 138000 ton ship for 10 mil, tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      You just love buying boats, don't ya ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: You just love buying boats, don't ya ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: You just love buying boats, don't ya ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/19
      
      Smearing sh_t all over the walls... on top of the graffiti., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: Smearing sh_t all over the walls... on top of the graffiti., tj Frazir, 2006/05/19
      
      T.J., do you approve of this wording ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/19
      
      Re: T.J., do you approve of this wording ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/20
      
      eMailing global producers., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: eMailing global producers., tj Frazir, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: eMailing global producers., tdp1001, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: eMailing global producers., tj Frazir, 2006/05/20
      
      I don't _Schmooze_ with aluminum producers., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/20
      
      Re: I don't _Schmooze_ with aluminum producers., T Wake, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: T.J., do you approve of this wording ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/20
      
      T.J., I'm not so sure about your 71 cents number, or the cash at their dock., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Finding the producers in Russia and Venezuela., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Bogoslovs Aluminium., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Bogoslovs Aluminium., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Bogoslovs Aluminium., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: Finding the producers in Russia and Venezuela., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: I couldn't be a sailor., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: I couldn't be a sailor., tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      ShipExpo.COM even shows the rust !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: ShipExpo.COM even shows the rust !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/16
      
      Re: T.J. is an �ber optimistic/enthusiastic hound dog., T Wake, 2006/05/22
      
      Who you are and who you know., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Who you are and who you know., tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Tall_Tales with _No_ external evidence., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Tall_Tales with _No_ external evidence., T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Who you are and who you know., T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      T.J. obviously buys and sells huge ships., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: T.J. obviously buys and sells huge ships., Randy Poe, 2006/05/24
      
      T.J. advocates/practices the purchase and management of huge ships., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: T.J. advocates/practices the purchase and management of huge sh..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: T.J. advocates/practices the purchase and management of huge ships., CrankHater, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: T.J. advocates/practices the purchase and management of huge ships., T Wake, 2006/05/25
      
      T.J. writes in a way that often makes no sense at first., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: T.J. writes in a way that often makes no sense at first., T Wake, 2006/05/26
      
      Unlike T.J. and me, T_Wake is no thinker., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Unlike T.J. and me, T_Wake is no thinker., T Wake, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: T.J. obviously buys and sells huge ships., T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: T.J. obviously buys and sells huge ships., CrankHater, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Drawing fire from all sides., T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Drawing fire from all sides., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Drawing fire from all sides., T Wake, 2006/05/14
      
      A big if., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A big if., tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A big boat 5000 ton for jeff, tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      I'd have to find the yards in Russia., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: A big if., T Wake, 2006/05/22
      
      I'm going to be rich, Rich, _Rich_ !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: I'm going to be rich, Rich, _Rich_ !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/23
      
      Why would a huge producer like Rusal.COM trust someone like me ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: Why would a huge producer like Rusal.COM trust someone like me ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Ok T.J., that sounds good... but I need a day or two to think it over., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      60 thousand tons of aluminum ingots ? you've got to be kidding., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: 60 thousand tons of aluminum ingots ? you've got to be kidding., T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: 60 thousand tons of aluminum ingots ? you've got to be kidding., tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Give me a few days to think about it., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Give me a few days to think about it., tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Don't be surprized if our grand experiment fails., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Don't be surprized if our grand experiment fails., T Wake, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Don't be surprized if our grand experiment fails., tj Frazir, 2006/05/25
      
      I'll send the emails... but I'd like some answers first., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: I'll send the emails... but I'd like some answers first., T Wake, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Give me a few days to think about it., tj Frazir, 2006/05/25
      
      SpotMetals.COM/ss/09346ali.htm, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: SpotMetals.COM/ss/09346ali.htm, tj Frazir, 2006/05/25
      
      I'll send out the emails, in the next few days or so, I hope., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Why would a huge producer like Rusal.COM trust someone like me ?, T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Why would a huge producer like Rusal.COM trust someone like me ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Why would a huge producer like Rusal.COM trust someone like me?, T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: I'm going to be rich, Rich, _Rich_ !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/23
      
      How did the monkeys carry the water ? any pics ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: How did the monkeys carry the water ? any pics ?, CrankHater, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: How did the monkeys carry the water ? any pics ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: How did the monkeys carry the water ? any pics ?, T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: How did the monkeys carry the water ? any pics ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      T.J., you should post some pictures., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: T.J., you should post some pictures., T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: T.J., you should post some pictures., tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: T.J., you should post some pictures., T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fill warehouses ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fill war..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: How many ..., T Wake, 2006/05/25
      
      T.J. says, " I've loaded boats for 25 years. ", Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fill warehouses ?, T Wake, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fill war..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fill war..., Randy Poe, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fill war..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/25
      
      Lake_Washington it is., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fillwar..., T Wake, 2006/05/26
      
      Something worth working on., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Something worth working on., tj Frazir, 2006/05/27
      
      A bunch of people at LSU.EDU are waiting on me., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Something worth working on., T Wake, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Something worth working on., T Wake, 2006/05/27
      
      T.J. has been buying and loading boats like this for the last 25 years., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: T.J. has been buying and loading boats like this for the last 25 years., T Wake, 2006/05/26
      
      Patinha_Minha., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Patinha_Minha., T Wake, 2006/05/28
      
      What I lack... totally and completely., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/26
      
      T_Wake is a poor judge of character., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: T_Wake is a poor judge of character., T Wake, 2006/05/25
      
      Hammond never made any sense and can't answer anyone's questions., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Hammond never made any sense and can't answer anyone's questions., T Wake, 2006/05/26
      
      If you inquire, and T.J.'s in the mood, he'll fill in the details., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: If you inquire, and T.J.'s in the mood, he'll fill in the details., tj Frazir, 2006/05/27
      
      Bill_Gates knows there's more than one kind of wealth., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Bill_Gates knows there's more than one kind of wealth., tj Frazir, 2006/05/27
      
      T.J., a reply from Srivaths and my proposed response., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: T.J., a reply from Srivaths and my proposed response., tj Frazir, 2006/05/27
      
      Who's done better ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Who's done better ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Who's done better ?, T Wake, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Bill_Gates knows there's more than one kind of wealth., T Wake, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: If you inquire, and T.J.'s in the mood, he'll fill in thedetails., T Wake, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: If you inquire, and T.J.'s in the mood, he'll fill in the details., T Wake, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: If you inquire, and T.J.'s in the mood, he'll fill in the details., tj Frazir, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: If you inquire, and T.J.'s in the mood, he'll fill in thedetails., T Wake, 2006/05/28
      
      If Bill_Gates were here..., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: If Bill_Gates were here..., T Wake, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: T_Wake is a poor judge of character., tj Frazir, 2006/05/25
      
      I'll probably be one lucky f_cker and T_Wake will have to eat his hat., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: I'll probably be one lucky f_cker and T_Wake will have to eat his hat., T Wake, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: T.J., you should post some pictures., tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: T.J., you should post some pictures., T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: I'm going to be rich, Rich, _Rich_ !, T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: I'm going to be rich, Rich, _Rich_ !, tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      Bull ! Monkeys can't roll/light cigarettes or trade them for cash., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Bull ! Monkeys can't roll/light cigarettes or trade them for cash., T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Bull ! Monkeys can't roll/light cigarettes or trade them for c..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      How the _Hell_ does the monkey light it ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: How the _Hell_ does the monkey light it ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/24
      
      T.J., you're an uber _Lazy_ writer, omitting _Vital_ context., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: How the _Hell_ does the monkey light it ?, T Wake, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: How the _Hell_ does the monkey light it ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/25
      
      Why people think T.J. is a liar., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/25
      
      Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., tj Frazir, 2006/05/26
      
      You should hire a digital photographer so you can post the links, T.J., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., T Wake, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., tj Frazir, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., T Wake, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., tj Frazir, 2006/05/26
      
      What is Paul_Allen's boat like ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: What is Paul_Allen's boat like ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/27
      
      Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., T Wake, 2006/05/28
      
      T_Wake, where's the pictures to prove you're an accountant ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: T_Wake, where's the pictures to prove you're an accountant ?, T Wake, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: T_Wake, where's the pictures to prove you're an accountant ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: T_Wake, where's the pictures to prove you're an accountant ?, T Wake, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      T.J.'s S_S_World., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      AboardTheWorld.COM, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/29
      
      T.J., are you the Norwegian Knut U. Kloster ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: T.J., are you the Norwegian Knut U. Kloster ?, T Wake, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: T.J., are you the Norwegian Knut U. Kloster ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: T.J., are you the Norwegian Knut U. Kloster ?, T Wake, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: T.J., are you the Norwegian Knut U. Kloster ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      Countless pictures of the S_S_World., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Countless pictures of the S_S_World., T Wake, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Countless pictures of the S_S_World., tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      T.J., Does your SS_World look _Exactly_ like ResidentSea's The_World ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: Countless pictures of the S_S_World., tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Countless pictures of the S_S_World., tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      Re: Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., tj Frazir, 2006/05/29
      
      The SS_World's residents are the _Owners_, as you say., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/30
      
      Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., T Wake, 2006/05/27
      
      Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., tj Frazir, 2006/05/27
      
      T.J., I've met your request to email the Russian producers., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: T.J., I've met your request to email the Russian producers., tj Frazir, 2006/05/28
      
      T.J., if you can find better email addresses... just show me !, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: T.J., I've met your request to email the Russian producers., tj Frazir, 2006/05/28
      
      T.J., do you have some decent email address I can use ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: T.J., do you have some decent email address I can use ?, tj Frazir, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: T.J., do you have some decent email address I can use ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/28
      
      Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., T Wake, 2006/05/28
      
      T.J., Have you met Gates ?, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/26
      
      Re: T.J., Have you met Gates ?, T Wake, 2006/05/26
      
      What I actually said about T_Wake., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: What I actually said about T_Wake., T Wake, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      I'll have lots of moochers hanging around., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
      
      I don't know T.J.'s face, name or phone number., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: I don't know T.J.'s face, name or phone number., tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: I don't know T.J.'s face, name or phone number., tj Frazir, 2006/05/15
      
      Mike_Mironenko's Parma-Limited.COM in Tatarstan, Russia., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Monday it is then. I'll learn by doing., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Alaska's tall mountains, watching over the inside passage., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/13
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 2006/05/14
      
      Sagar Chowrasia of Manaksia Limited, in Kolkata, INDIA, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/15
      
      Re: It isn't uncommon for Ethen to nab 4 Credit/Debit cards a day., tj Frazir, 2006/05/10
      
      I haven't built up any momentum yet, I can't find the inspiration., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: It isn't uncommon for Ethen to nab 4 Credit/Debit cards a day., T Wake, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: Steve Liu, Aluminum_Ingots.JPG, tj Frazir, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      I'm willing to explore T.J.'s methods, to see where it takes me., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., T Wake, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., jimp, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., T Wake, 2006/05/12
      
      Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 2006/05/05
      
      Hold floating conferences and have companies send their employees to it., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Hold floating conferences and have companies send their employees to it., T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Hold floating conferences and have companies send their employe..., tj Frazir, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: T.J., I'm just getting started, going slow at first., T Wake, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: T.J., I'm just getting started, going slow at first., tj Frazir, 2006/05/04
Re: It's a Bird! It's a Plane! NO, It's yet another Conrad RETARDED post!, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/03
While gone for 3 days... 2800 posts. This group is lame., Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/03
1.38 million KRW per MT of aluminum ingots, Cash_at_Your_Dock., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/03
- Re: 1.38 million KRW per MT of aluminum ingots, Cash_at_Your_Dock., T Wake, 2006/05/03
  - Re: 1.38 million KRW per MT of aluminum ingots, Cash_at_Your_Dock., tj Frazir, 2006/05/04
    - Re: 1.38 million KRW per MT of aluminum ingots, Cash_at_Your_Dock., T Wake, 2006/05/04
    - Learning by doing., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/08
Isaac Newton - World Of Biography, Bits, 2006/05/03
- Re: Isaac Newton - World Of Biography, Bob Cain, 2006/05/06
19 more offers. My follow-up to Jung_Min., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/03
- Re: 19 more offers. My follow-up to Jung_Min., T Wake, 2006/05/03
  - T_Wake enjoys the wost tripe on Usenet, i.e. my posts., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/04
    - Re: T_Wake enjoys the wost tripe on Usenet, i.e. my posts., tj Frazir, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: T_Wake enjoys the wost tripe on Usenet, i.e. my posts., T Wake, 2006/05/04
    - Re: T_Wake enjoys the wost tripe on Usenet, i.e. my posts., T Wake, 2006/05/04
- Re: 19 more offers. My follow-up to Jung_Min., tj Frazir, 2006/05/03
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 30: Confinement (and Matter?) Generated By Bianchi Identity Violations, OsherD, 2006/05/03
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 30: Confinement (and Matter?) Generated By Bianchi Identity Violations, OsherD, 2006/05/03
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 30: Confinement (and Matter?) Generated By Bianchi Identity Violations, OsherD, 2006/05/03
    - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 30: Confinement (and Matter?) Generated By Bianchi Identity Violations, Fahad Alhasan, 2006/05/03
Gravity, it's "energy source", and a bowling ball on a matress, Mike Ruskai, 2006/05/02
- Re: Gravity, it's "energy source", and a bowling ball on a matress, CWatters, 2006/05/03
- Re: Gravity, it's "energy source", and a bowling ball on a matress, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/04
- Re: Gravity, it's "energy source", and a bowling ball on a matress, Mike, 2006/05/04
  - Re: Gravity, it's "energy source", and a bowling ball on a matress, Mike Ruskai, 2006/05/05
Time has two directions, brodix, 2006/05/02
- Re: Time has two directions, puppet_sock, 2006/05/03
- Re: Time has two directions, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/03
- Re: Time has two directions, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/03
  - Re: Time has two directions, brodix, 2006/05/04
    - Re: Time has two directions, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: Time has two directions, brodix, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: Time has two directions, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: Time has two directions, brodix, 2006/05/04
Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics, ggdbr01, 2006/05/02
- Re: Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics, AverageDude, 2006/05/02
  - Re: Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics, ggdbr01, 2006/05/03
Fermat's Last Theorem - Did It Discover Feedback?, OsherD, 2006/05/02
Islamist-Like Disinformation Replies To My Nonrenormalization Thread, OsherD, 2006/05/02
- Re: Islamist-Like Disinformation Replies To My Nonrenormalization Thread, vanep, 2006/05/02
  - Re: Islamist-Like Disinformation Replies To My Nonrenormalization Thread, OsherD, 2006/05/02
- Re: Islamist-Like Disinformation Replies To My Nonrenormalization Thread, Fahad Alhasan, 2006/05/02
  - Re: Islamist-Like Disinformation Replies To My Nonrenormalization Thread, Edward Green, 2006/05/07
    - Re: Islamist-Like Disinformation Replies To My Nonrenormalization Thread, OsherD, 2006/05/08
The adventure of physics - new version for free download, chri_schiller, 2006/05/02
- Re: The adventure of physics - new version for free download, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/02
A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, Mirror Space, 2006/05/02
- Re: A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/02
  - Re: A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, ma1ibu, 2006/05/02
    - Re: A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/02
    - Re: A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/05/02
    - Re: A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/06
  - Re: A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, Mirror Space, 2006/05/03
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 776 May 2, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 2006/05/02
"The Einstein Hoax", Eht, 2006/05/02
- Re: "The Einstein Hoax", donstockbauer, 2006/05/02
- "The Einstein Hoax", Kalb, 2006/05/27
black hole vs. equilibrium point, dedanoe, 2006/05/02
- Re: black hole vs. equilibrium point, donstockbauer, 2006/05/02
  - Re: black hole vs. equilibrium point, dedanoe, 2006/05/04
Ernest Rutherford Famouse biography of world, Bits, 2006/05/02
- Re: Ernest Rutherford Famouse biography of world, puppet_sock, 2006/05/02
Instantaneous Axis of Rotation, Edward Green, 2006/05/02
- Re: Instantaneous Axis of Rotation, ma1ibu, 2006/05/02
- Re: Instantaneous Axis of Rotation, michaeld, 2006/05/02
  - Re: Instantaneous Axis of Rotation, Edward Green, 2006/05/07
Science & Technology Pilgrimage (Tour) of Europe $ USA, atul58@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/05/02
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 29: Probabilistic Physics Underlies Geometry, OsherD, 2006/05/02
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 29: Probabilistic Physics Underlies Geometry, OsherD, 2006/05/02
  - Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 29: Probabilistic Physics Underlies Geometry, OsherD, 2006/05/02
Attempting to automate Visual_Studio_2005, Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/02
- Automating Visual_Studio_2005 using the ATL., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/02
  - Re: Automating Visual_Studio_2005 using the ATL., John Bailo, 2006/05/02
    - I'm just talented like that., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: I'm just talented like that., John A. Bailo, 2006/05/02
      
      It's a lifestyle choice., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: It's a lifestyle choice., T Wake, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: It's a lifestyle choice., Eric Gisse, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: It's a lifestyle choice., JEDIDIAH, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: It's a lifestyle choice., JEDIDIAH, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: It's a lifestyle choice., John Bailo, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: It's a lifestyle choice., JEDIDIAH, 2006/05/03
      
      Feed rats more, give them more drugs, they grow old quicker and die sooner., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: Feed rats more, give them more drugs, they grow old quicker and die sooner., T Wake, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: Feed rats more, give them more drugs, they grow old quicker and die sooner., Eric Gisse, 2006/05/03
  - Re: Automating Visual_Studio_2005 using the ATL., T Wake, 2006/05/02
- Re: Attempting to automate Visual_Studio_2005, T Wake, 2006/05/02
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 2006/05/01
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Lloyd Parker, 2006/05/02
  - Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Waldo, 2006/05/11
Re: Integrating a pi product, Peter Jay Salzman, 2006/05/01
Re: I hate selling shit... I'd rather go homeless., tj Frazir, 2006/05/01
- I just don't see the bait... it's not real to me., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/02
Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/01
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/01
  - Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/01
    - Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/03
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/04
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/06
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/08
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/10
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/05/11
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/14
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/22
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/23
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/24
      
      Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 2006/05/09
Re: Cold Storage (OT?), Ken Muldrew, 2006/05/01
- Re: Cold Storage (OT?), Luc The Perverse, 2006/05/01
rolling and sliding objects, katy, 2006/05/01
- Re: rolling and sliding objects, CWatters, 2006/05/01
- Re: rolling and sliding objects, Fredrik Bulow, 2006/05/02
  - Re: rolling and sliding objects, katy, 2006/05/02
    - Re: rolling and sliding objects, Fredrik Bulow, 2006/05/02
neutron steering?, jack, 2006/05/01
- Re: neutron steering?, FrediFizzx, 2006/05/01
- Re: neutron steering?, Greg Hansen, 2006/05/01
- Re: neutron steering?, Fahad Alhasan, 2006/05/01
Re: Feeling a little insecure ? !, EnlightenMe, 2006/05/01
- The causalities are surely there... waiting to be discovered., Jeff…Relf, 2006/05/02
  - Re: The causalities are surely there... waiting to be discovered., T Wake, 2006/05/02
Super strong neutron source started up, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/01
- Re: Super strong neutron source started up, grisly, 2006/05/01
- Re: Super strong neutron source started up, AverageDude, 2006/05/01
  - Re: Super strong neutron source started up, tj Frazir, 2006/05/01
  - Re: Super strong neutron source started up, Jan Panteltje, 2006/05/02
Re: habshi demonstrates he is completely insane -- out of touch with reality. Wants to DIG a LAKE to dispose of rising oceans., me, 2006/05/01
- Re: habshi demonstrates he is completely insane -- out of touch with reality. Wants to DIG a LAKE to dispose of rising oceans., mmeron, 2006/05/01
Re: 3.jpeg, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/01
Re: What is a "peer" for peer review?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/01
Re: blue, green and red!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/01
- Re: blue, green and red!, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/05/05
  - Re: blue, green and red!, Edward Green, 2006/05/06
  - Re: blue, green and red!, tadchem, 2006/05/06
    - Re: blue, green and red!, Hexenmeister, 2006/05/06
    - Re: blue, green and red!, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/07
      
      Re: blue, green and red!, tadchem, 2006/05/07
  - Re: blue, green and red!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/06
  - Re: blue, green and red!, Henning Makholm, 2006/05/07
Re: dedanoe's shocking device, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/01
Re: Eric_Gisse, Thanks for feeding my ego all the time., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/05/01
- Re: Eric_Gisse, Thanks for feeding my ego all the time., T Wake, 2006/05/01
Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Reverend Dave, 2006/05/01
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., T Wake, 2006/05/01
  - Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Reverend Dave, 2006/05/02
    - Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., T Wake, 2006/05/02
      
      Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Reverend Dave, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., T Wake, 2006/05/05
      
      Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Reverend Dave, 2006/05/08
    - Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., R. Pierce Butler, 2006/05/05
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Mike, 2006/05/01
  - Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Bob, 2006/05/01
    - Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., george, 2006/05/01