sci.physics (date)
May 30, 2006
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Greg Neill, 06:50
- Re: What Evolution Really Is (pantheism) `~, The Sorcerer, 06:24
- Re: What Evolution Really Is (pantheism) `~, The Sorcerer, 06:24
- Re: A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, Bart van der Wolf, 05:54
- Re: Relative speed..., The Sorcerer, 05:44
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Cleverbum, 05:39
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jmfbahciv, 05:37
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jmfbahciv, 05:35
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jmfbahciv, 05:34
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, jmfbahciv, 05:30
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 05:20
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 05:15
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, Jan Panteltje, 05:14
- Re: Physics is dead!, Harry, 05:11
- Re: What Evolution Really Is (pantheism) `~, tadchem, 05:09
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, tadchem, 05:04
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, Richard Herring, 04:42
- Re: Bush doesn't go around killing people who consume less energy., platopes, 04:27
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, platopes, 04:08
- Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), Mike, 03:18
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 03:12
- Re: Lisa Randall interview, FrediFizzx, 02:34
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 02:23
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 01:54
- Re: Lisa Randall interview, greysky, 01:37
- Bush doesn't go around killing people who consume less energy., Jeff…Relf, 01:06
- Re: Relative speed..., Bob Cain, 01:05
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jimp, 00:45
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Timo Nieminen, 00:38
- The SS_World's residents are the _Owners_, as you say., Jeff…Relf, 00:31
- T.J., Does your SS_World look _Exactly_ like ResidentSea's The_World ?, Jeff…Relf, 00:09
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, tj Frazir, 00:08
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 00:05
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
May 29, 2006
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, srp, 23:59
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, FrediFizzx, 23:55
- Usenet/Web is the best way to let the poor have a voice., Jeff…Relf, 23:46
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Golden Boar, 23:39
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Timo Nieminen, 23:34
- Re: Countless pictures of the S_S_World., tj Frazir, 23:28
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 23:20
- Re: Countless pictures of the S_S_World., tj Frazir, 23:06
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 23:04
- Re: T.J., are you the Norwegian Knut U. Kloster ?, tj Frazir, 22:59
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 22:56
- Re: Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., tj Frazir, 22:53
- Re: Countless pictures of the S_S_World., tj Frazir, 22:52
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, tj Frazir, 22:43
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, tj Frazir, 22:37
- Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less., tj Frazir, 22:21
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, srp, 22:00
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jimp, 21:15
- "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Klim, 21:07
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 20:48
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 20:40
- Re: A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, DaveG, 20:17
- Re: A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, tadchem, 19:53
- Re: A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, jimp, 19:25
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 19:05
- A4 dimensions? - accurate to 2 decimal places, Waxo, 18:59
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Timo Nieminen, 18:47
- Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), hetware, 18:44
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 18:43
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 18:20
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, The Sorcerer, 18:18
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 18:01
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
- Re: Writers 8,600 years ago in China., Lawson English, 17:26
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Ken S. Tucker, 17:25
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jimp, 17:25
- Re: Difference between chance and risk, The Sorcerer, 17:17
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, srp, 16:52
- Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 16:45
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 16:39
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 16:33
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:33
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 16:30
- Re: I did not find Salam's article, FrediFizzx, 16:23
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, srp, 16:23
- Re: I did not find Salam's article, puppet_sock, 16:21
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:18
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, puppet_sock, 16:17
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 16:15
- Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 16:12
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 16:08
- Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, T Wake, 16:07
- ED CONRAD POST IRKS INTERNET COMMISSION, Ed Conrad, 16:05
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 16:05
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Ned Simmons, 16:03
- Re: Countless pictures of the S_S_World., T Wake, 16:02
- I did not find Salam's article, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 15:51
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 15:40
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 15:40
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 15:32
- Re: Questions about nanocrystals, Glenn Møller-Holst, 15:15
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, Jan Panteltje, 15:05
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 15:00
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 14:58
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 14:56
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 14:53
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 14:52
- Questions about nanocrystals, lethal, 14:46
- Countless pictures of the S_S_World., Jeff…Relf, 14:40
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 14:39
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 14:36
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Ken Muldrew, 14:33
- Re: Difference between chance and risk, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:23
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 14:22
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 14:07
- Sylvester's Inertia, Sensei, 13:59
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 13:45
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jimp, 13:45
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 13:43
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 13:31
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 13:20
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 13:19
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Randy Poe, 13:14
- Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 13:09
- Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!, Y.Porat, 13:04
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), The Sorcerer, 13:01
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 12:48
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Timo A. Nieminen, 12:38
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 12:34
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, FrediFizzx, 12:27
- Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles, srp, 12:24
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 12:18
- Re: T.J., are you the Norwegian Knut U. Kloster ?, T Wake, 12:13
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 11:21
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Paul Cardinale, 11:18
- Re: Conservation of Energy, joe_avery_2005, 11:05
- Collaborative wiki - Physicists needed, david, 10:52
- Re: Noether's Theorem, joe_avery_2005, 10:52
- Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), joe_avery_2005, 10:45
- Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, mathlover, 10:45
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jimp, 10:45
- Re: T.J., are you the Norwegian Knut U. Kloster ?, tj Frazir, 10:41
- Talk of proton smashing at Duke, Mike Jr., 10:38
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:32
- Lisa Randall interview, Mike Jr., 10:31
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, tj Frazir, 10:30
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:29
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:28
- Wave Particle Duality; FYI, Mike Jr., 10:25
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 09:21
- Re: Frame of reference!!!, The Sorcerer, 09:18
- Re: Relative speed..., The Sorcerer, 09:04
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 08:42
- Re: Frame of reference!!!, donstockbauer, 08:04
- Re: Frame of reference!!!, Cleverbum, 07:56
- Frame of reference!!!, ALFAISAL, 07:42
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 07:14
- interaction of two free magentic dipoles, Cleverbum, 06:57
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 06:50
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 06:39
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 06:25
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Y.Porat, 06:24
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 06:14
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 29, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 06:09
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 06:06
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jmfbahciv, 05:53
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 05:46
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 05:26
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 05:25
- Re: T.J., are you the Norwegian Knut U. Kloster ?, T Wake, 03:59
- Re: T_Wake, where's the pictures to prove you're an accountant ?, T Wake, 03:57
- Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), Mike, 03:13
- T.J., are you the Norwegian Knut U. Kloster ?, Jeff…Relf, 03:09
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 02:43
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 02:22
- AboardTheWorld.COM, Jeff…Relf, 02:18
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, koobee . wublee, 01:57
- T.J.'s S_S_World., Jeff…Relf, 01:42
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 01:33
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 01:15
- Re: Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., tj Frazir, 01:13
- Re: Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., tj Frazir, 00:50
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jimp, 00:45
- Re: Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., tj Frazir, 00:31
- Re: Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., tj Frazir, 00:24
May 28, 2006
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 23:21
- Re: T.J., do you have some decent email address I can use ?, Jeff…Relf, 22:51
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 22:45
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 22:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 22:33
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 22:33
- Re: Feynman II-19-11: typo?, Sam Wormley, 22:32
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 22:27
- Re: T_Wake, where's the pictures to prove you're an accountant ?, tj Frazir, 22:27
- Re: T.J., do you have some decent email address I can use ?, tj Frazir, 22:23
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 22:22
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 22:18
- Re: Structural Steel Question, tj Frazir, 22:13
- Re: The moon's surface had 1.25 millirads per _Hour_., tj Frazir, 22:08
- Re: Relative speed..., The Ghost In The Machine, 22:01
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:01
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: Who or what is Luna ?, tj Frazir, 21:59
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 21:56
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 51: Algebra, Detail-Orientation, and Bureaucracy, John Sattat, 21:06
- The moon's surface had 1.25 millirads per _Hour_., Jeff…Relf, 20:54
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 20:52
- Re: Feynman II-19-11: typo?, Jim Black, 20:43
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 20:17
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 19:44
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 19:42
- Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), hetware, 19:41
- Re: Noether's Theorem, Mike, 19:25
- Re: Relative speed..., The Sorcerer, 19:15
- Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), Mike, 19:05
- Re: Noether's Theorem, Jim Black, 18:11
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Randy Poe, 17:30
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 17:16
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 17:03
- Re: Relative speed..., The Ghost In The Machine, 17:00
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:00
- Re: Feynman II-19-11: typo?, hetware, 16:54
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 16:53
- Re: Feynman II-19-11: typo?, fjolsvit, 16:48
- Feynman II-19-11: typo?, hetware, 16:29
- Re: Who or what is Luna ?, The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
- Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, Craig Markwardt, 15:43
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 15:37
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 15:32
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 15:29
- Re: Structural Steel Question, The Sorcerer, 15:22
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 15:18
- Re: missing cause, missing effect, Igor, 15:13
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 15:02
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 14:59
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Roy L . Fuchs, 14:57
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 14:51
- Re: Who or what is Luna ?, 'foolsrushin', 14:37
- Re: What Evolution Really Is (pantheism) `~, Tom McDonald, 14:32
- Re: Who or what is Luna ?, nibblenot, 14:22
- Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), Igor, 14:03
- Re: Who or what is Luna ?, 'foolsrushin', 13:54
- Re: Structural Steel Question, hetware, 13:52
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 13:46
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 13:43
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 13:30
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 13:29
- Re: Structural Steel Question, The Sorcerer, 13:26
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 13:23
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 13:22
- Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t), hetware, 13:21
- Re: Structural Steel Question, hetware, 13:05
- Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, mathlover, 12:30
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 12:20
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 12:07
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 12:00
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 11:43
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Sorcerer, 11:39
- Re: Relative speed..., The Sorcerer, 11:33
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), daestrom, 11:27
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Edward Green, 11:20
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, The Sorcerer, 11:18
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, The Sorcerer, 10:50
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Hlafordlaes, 10:49
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 10:48
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 10:42
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 10:42
- Re: Conservation of Energy, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 10:39
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 10:38
- Cubic packing., ma1ibu, 10:25
- Re: Correct way to write 24 hour-time? Decimalpoint too., OG, 10:24
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 10:16
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 10:11
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 10:06
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 10:06
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Roy L . Fuchs, 09:52
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:19
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:17
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:16
- "General Relativity Examined", Kalb, 09:09
- Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 09:06
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 07:42
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 07:42
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 07:42
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 07:42
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 07:25
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, The Sorcerer, 07:18
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 07:14
- Re: Need Help For Physics Project, Jan Panteltje, 06:42
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Jan Panteltje, 06:33
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, Alessio, 06:28
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 06:25
- Re: Translations., T Wake, 06:00
- Re: T_Wake, where's the pictures to prove you're an accountant ?, T Wake, 06:00
- Re: Who or what is Luna ?, T Wake, 05:56
- T_Wake, where's the pictures to prove you're an accountant ?, Jeff…Relf, 05:54
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, vavroom, 05:54
- Re: Translations., Dylan Sung, 05:48
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, jmfbahciv, 05:47
- Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., T Wake, 05:38
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmfbahciv, 05:37
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmfbahciv, 05:35
- Re: Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., T Wake, 05:34
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 05:32
- Re: Who's done better ?, T Wake, 05:31
- Re: If Bill_Gates were here..., T Wake, 05:31
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 05:29
- Re: If you inquire, and T.J.'s in the mood, he'll fill in thedetails., T Wake, 05:28
- Re: Patinha_Minha., T Wake, 05:27
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 05:25
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, jmfbahciv, 05:18
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 51: Algebra, Detail-Orientation, and Bureaucracy, OsherD, 04:06
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 04:02
- T.J., do you have some decent email address I can use ?, Jeff…Relf, 03:51
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 51: Algebra, Detail-Orientation, and Bureaucracy, OsherD, 03:46
- T.J., if you can find better email addresses... just show me !, Jeff…Relf, 03:36
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 03:30
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, tj Frazir, 03:16
- Re: T.J., I've met your request to email the Russian producers., tj Frazir, 03:13
- major new book on the Periodic Table, johnno, 03:12
- Re: T.J., I've met your request to email the Russian producers., tj Frazir, 03:09
- Paul_Allen's 500 x 60 ft, 8,000 ton yacht., Jeff…Relf, 03:02
- Re: Who's done better ?, tj Frazir, 02:57
- Re: Aquygen blog: car that runs on water?, CWatters, 02:52
- Re: Who or what is Luna ?, tj Frazir, 02:46
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 02:33
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, mmeron, 02:22
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 02:12
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Ghost In The Machine, 02:01
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, The Ghost In The Machine, 02:00
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:33
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:31
- Translations., Jeff…Relf, 01:28
- Who or what is Luna ?, Jeff…Relf, 01:05
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Timo A. Nieminen, 01:00
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: Relative speed..., The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- T.J., I've met your request to email the Russian producers., Jeff…Relf, 00:59
- Re: Difference between chance and risk, mmeron, 00:47
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, platopes, 00:46
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, mmeron, 00:46
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 00:44
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 00:31
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 00:29
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 00:28
- If Bill_Gates were here..., Jeff…Relf, 00:06
- Re: The Tech_Booms of the late 20's, late 60's and late 90's., tj Frazir, 00:02
May 27, 2006
- Who's done better ?, Jeff…Relf, 23:50
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 23:27
- Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, Eric Gisse, 23:15
- Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., tj Frazir, 23:14
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Edward Green, 22:57
- Re: Need Help For Physics Project, John Sattat, 22:53
- Re: If you inquire, and T.J.'s in the mood, he'll fill in the details., tj Frazir, 22:51
- Re: T.J., a reply from Srivaths and my proposed response., tj Frazir, 22:40
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Edward Green, 22:36
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 22:25
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 22:22
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, tadchem, 22:10
- Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, FrediFizzx, 21:45
- Re: Difference between chance and risk, tadchem, 21:31
- Patinha_Minha., Jeff…Relf, 21:29
- Re: missing cause, missing effect, ma1ibu, 21:07
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Eric Gisse, 20:33
- Re: earth's magnetic field, mmeron, 20:25
- Re: Correct way to write 24 hour-time? Decimalpoint too., T Wake, 20:15
- Re: earth's magnetic field, Timo A. Nieminen, 19:40
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 19:34
- Re: Greek letters., Peter Alaca, 19:33
- Re: Noether's Theorem, actionintegral, 18:58
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, The Sorcerer, 17:33
- Re: Need Help For Physics Project, The Sorcerer, 17:25
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 17:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 17:07
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 17:07
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 17:03
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 17:00
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 16:57
- Re: Correct way to write 24 hour-time? Decimalpoint too., jimp, 16:45
- Re: earth's magnetic field, mmeron, 16:41
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 16:40
- Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, The Sorcerer, 16:39
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 16:29
- Re: Conservation of Energy, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 16:27
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, mmeron, 16:27
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 16:21
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Mike Yarwood, 16:17
- Re: BUT de broglie's ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????, srp, 16:16
- Re: Noether's Theorem, Rene Tschaggelar, 16:11
- Re: Noether's Theorem, mmeron, 16:10
- Re: Correct way to write 24 hour-time? Decimalpoint too., Rene Tschaggelar, 16:07
- Re: Difference between chance and risk, jimp, 16:05
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 16:01
- Re: light travelling to universe edge, The Sorcerer, 15:51
- BUT de broglie's ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????, NILS BÖRJESSON, 15:46
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 15:45
- Re: Difference between chance and risk, CWatters, 15:37
- Re: Difference between chance and risk, Mike Yarwood, 15:34
- Re: earth's magnetic field, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:32
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:22
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, mmeron, 15:19
- Re: missing cause, missing effect, Igor, 15:14
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:08
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 14:45
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 14:43
- T.J., a reply from Srivaths and my proposed response., Jeff…Relf, 14:42
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 14:28
- Re: Need Help For Physics Project, Jan Panteltje, 14:20
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Jan Panteltje, 14:16
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Jan Panteltje, 14:15
- Re: Need Help For Physics Project, DJ FroZone, 14:08
- Re: Need Help For Physics Project, DJ FroZone, 14:08
- Re: Need Help For Physics Project, jimp, 14:05
- Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 May 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, FrediFizzx, 13:57
- Re: Need Help For Physics Project, Helmut Wabnig, 13:48
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Roy L . Fuchs, 13:42
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Roy L . Fuchs, 13:40
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 13:34
- Need Help For Physics Project, djice4545, 13:28
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 13:27
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 13:20
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 13:18
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 13:16
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, jimp, 13:15
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Roy L . Fuchs, 13:12
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 13:02
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Everett M. Greene, 12:56
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 12:44
- Difference between chance and risk, Urchie, 12:25
- Re: BUT de broglie's ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????, srp, 12:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 12:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 12:13
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, The Sorcerer, 11:47
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, The Sorcerer, 11:47
- Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, mathlover, 11:45
- Re: Noether's Theorem, The Sorcerer, 11:27
- Re: questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, The Sorcerer, 11:23
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:16
- Re: Dandelion seed, tadchem, 11:15
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 11:06
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 10:51
- Re: EMRP Gravity Theory, Eric Gisse, 10:42
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 10:38
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 10:33
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 10:16
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, The Sorcerer, 10:07
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 09:57
- Re: EMRP Gravity Theory, Jan Panteltje, 09:54
- questions on the duality invariance of Maxwell equations, mathlover, 09:46
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 09:41
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 09:37
- "The Einstein Hoax", Kalb, 09:29
- Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, T Wake, 09:24
- Re: Bill_Gates knows there's more than one kind of wealth., T Wake, 09:22
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 09:17
- Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:12
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmurph, 09:00
- Noether's Theorem, actionintegral, 08:59
- EMRP Gravity Theory, Blaze Labs, 08:59
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 08:56
- Aquygen blog: car that runs on water?, jmurph, 08:51
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 08:47
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, jmfbahciv, 08:47
- Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, top9, 08:43
- BUT de broglie's ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????, NILS BÖRJESSON, 08:41
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 08:38
- Re: Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Jan Panteltje, 08:27
- Kinetic Storage of Lightning Strike, Hlafordlaes, 08:13
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 07:54
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, jmfbahciv, 07:40
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, jmfbahciv, 07:37
- Re: Structural Steel Question, ABarlow, 07:34
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, jmfbahciv, 07:34
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmfbahciv, 07:14
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmfbahciv, 07:10
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmfbahciv, 07:08
- Re: light travelling to universe edge, John Bailey, 07:07
- Re: How to make an object invisible?, Jan Panteltje, 07:03
- the 4th International Conference (SETIT 2007): TUNISIA, medsalim . bouhlel, 06:57
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 06:57
- The 4th International Conference on Sciences of Electronic, Technologies of Information, medsalim . bouhlel, 06:52
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 06:51
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 06:46
- Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., T Wake, 06:14
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 06:12
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 06:12
- Re: If you inquire, and T.J.'s in the mood, he'll fill in thedetails., T Wake, 06:11
- Re: If you inquire, and T.J.'s in the mood, he'll fill in the details., T Wake, 06:07
- Re: Something worth working on., T Wake, 06:05
- Re: Something worth working on., T Wake, 06:04
- Re: Unlike T.J. and me, T_Wake is no thinker., T Wake, 06:04
- Re: missing cause, missing effect, donstockbauer, 05:55
- Finally an Odd Lens, Sam Wormley, 05:42
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), tadchem, 05:00
- Gripping Tale: Metal oozes in nanotubes' grasp, Sam Wormley, 04:48
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, tadchem, 04:42
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 04:42
- Gripping Tale: Metal oozes in nanotubes' grasp, Sam Wormley, 04:32
- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 May 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 04:30
- Re: Structural Steel Question, CWatters, 03:52
- Re: earth's magnetic field, mmeron, 03:52
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 03:28
- Re: Greek letters., Dylan Sung, 02:46
- Better Troll Barriers, Bob Cain, 02:00
- Re: earth's magnetic field, Timo A. Nieminen, 01:50
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 50: Initial Value Equation of the Universe, OsherD, 01:32
- Re: Bill_Gates knows there's more than one kind of wealth., tj Frazir, 01:23
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 01:20
- Bill_Gates knows there's more than one kind of wealth., Jeff…Relf, 01:12
- Re: What is Paul_Allen's boat like ?, tj Frazir, 01:10
- Re: earth's magnetic field, mmeron, 01:08
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, mmeron, 01:07
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 49: Sub-Planck Non-Geometry is Nonsense, OsherD, 01:06
- Re: light travelling to universe edge, varun . vampire, 00:57
- A bunch of people at LSU.EDU are waiting on me., Jeff…Relf, 00:50
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 49: Sub-Planck Non-Geometry is Nonsense, OsherD, 00:48
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 00:44
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 48: Do Singularities Generate Mass?, John Sattat, 00:43
- Re: If you inquire, and T.J.'s in the mood, he'll fill in the details., tj Frazir, 00:42
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 49: Sub-Planck Non-Geometry is Nonsense, OsherD, 00:34
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 49: Sub-Planck Non-Geometry is Nonsense, OsherD, 00:25
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 00:22
- Re: Something worth working on., tj Frazir, 00:02
May 26, 2006
- Re: earth's magnetic field, Timo A. Nieminen, 23:57
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 48: Do Singularities Generate Mass?, OsherD, 23:57
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Timo A. Nieminen, 23:56
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Timo A. Nieminen, 23:53
- What is Paul_Allen's boat like ?, Jeff…Relf, 23:28
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 23:24
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 23:17
- Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, Minus XVII, 23:16
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Mark Thorson, 23:15
- If you inquire, and T.J.'s in the mood, he'll fill in the details., Jeff…Relf, 23:14
- Something worth working on., Jeff…Relf, 22:55
- Unlike T.J. and me, T_Wake is no thinker., Jeff…Relf, 22:49
- light travelling to universe edge, ma1ibu, 22:47
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 48: Do Singularities Generate Mass?, donstockbauer, 22:44
- Re: GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims, donstockbauer, 22:41
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, Richard Henry, 22:36
- missing cause, missing effect, ma1ibu, 21:56
- Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., tj Frazir, 21:50
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 21:34
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 21:30
- How to make an object invisible?, Sam Wormley, 21:21
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 21:18
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 21:17
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), AZ Nomad, 21:14
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 21:12
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 21:10
- Re: T.J. has been buying and loading boats like this for the last 25 years., T Wake, 21:09
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 21:03
- T.J. has been buying and loading boats like this for the last 25 years., Jeff…Relf, 20:44
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, stewart_connor, 20:40
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Golden Boar, 20:27
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 20:20
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, mmeron, 20:07
- Re: T.J., Have you met Gates ?, T Wake, 19:36
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 48: Do Singularities Generate Mass?, OsherD, 19:35
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 19:26
- Re: earth's magnetic field, Sam Wormley, 19:21
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 19:17
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Greg Hansen, 19:10
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 47: Probability Generates Singularities, OsherD, 18:57
- Re: Conservation of Energy, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 18:54
- Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, david petry, 18:49
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 47: Probability Generates Singularities, Yotteru?, 18:28
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Herb Martin, 18:28
- Re: earth's magnetic field, mmeron, 18:22
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 47: Probability Generates Singularities, Yotteru?, 18:22
- Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 18:19
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 47: Probability Generates Singularities, OsherD, 18:14
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, vavroom, 18:11
- Re: earth's magnetic field, Chris, 18:11
- Re: earth's magnetic field, jimp, 18:05
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, vavroom, 18:04
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 47: Probability Generates Singularities, OsherD, 18:04
- T.J., Have you met Gates ?, Jeff…Relf, 17:56
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Mike, 17:54
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 17:39
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 17:37
- earth's magnetic field, mrdarrett, 17:35
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:01
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Mike, 16:52
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, PD, 16:18
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 16:13
- Re: Structural Steel Question, hetware, 15:24
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Ken Muldrew, 15:21
- Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, Herman Rubin, 15:13
- Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., T Wake, 15:03
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Golden Boar, 14:55
- Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 778 May 26, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Jan Panteltje, 14:20
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 14:17
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 14:15
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 14:14
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 May 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 14:11
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, PD, 14:07
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 778 May 26, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 14:04
- Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., tj Frazir, 14:03
- Re: Physics is dead!, PD, 14:03
- Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, The Sorcerer, 13:55
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?" [Gravity Probe B tests Einsteins General Relativity], Glenn Møller-Holst, 13:20
- Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:15
- Re: Question about planetary magnetic fields, Greg Neill, 13:08
- Re: The bridge between Newton and SR via Maxwell, Greg Neill, 13:05
- Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, jimp, 12:55
- Re: Structural Steel Question, hetware, 12:52
- Re: Question about planetary magnetic fields, jimp, 12:45
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, donstockbauer, 12:28
- The bridge between Newton and SR via Maxwell, srp, 12:25
- Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:22
- Re: Question about planetary magnetic fields, The Sorcerer, 12:13
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 12:05
- Question about planetary magnetic fields, j . a . lively, 11:55
- Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, top9, 11:48
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:41
- Re: "WORLDS IN COLLISION" -- Velikovsky's Masterpiece, Brad Guth, 11:22
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 11:17
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 11:15
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 10:56
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 10:36
- Re: Blackbodies, Emissivity, Absorptivity, Reflectance and Reality, hetware, 10:28
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 10:22
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 10:13
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 10:00
- Re: The faster you consume the faster you yourself will be consumed., Lizz Holmans, 09:53
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 09:28
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 09:27
- Re: Rate of dissolving gases to water, Andy Resnick, 09:11
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Mike, 09:09
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?", Mike, 09:03
- Re: Blackbodies, Emissivity, Absorptivity, Reflectance and Reality, Andy Resnick, 08:59
- Re: Structural Steel Question, CWatters, 08:57
- Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., T Wake, 08:48
- Re: I'll probably be one lucky f_cker and T_Wake will have to eat his hat., T Wake, 08:47
- Re: Hammond never made any sense and can't answer anyone's questions., T Wake, 08:46
- Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, John Schutkeker, 08:46
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 08:44
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 08:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 08:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 08:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 08:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 08:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 08:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 08:43
- Re: How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fillwar..., T Wake, 08:42
- Re: T.J. writes in a way that often makes no sense at first., T Wake, 08:41
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 08:17
- "Is There a Force of Gravity?", Kalb, 08:09
- "Is There a Force of Gravity?", Kalb, 08:09
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, stewart_connor, 07:31
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 07:31
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 07:14
- Structural Steel Question, ABarlow, 05:40
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), jmfbahciv, 05:38
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, jmfbahciv, 05:34
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, jmfbahciv, 05:29
- What I lack... totally and completely., Jeff…Relf, 05:10
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), The Sorcerer, 05:07
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), The Sorcerer, 05:07
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 04:17
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, SAIL4EVR, 03:33
- Re: Blackbodies, Emissivity, Absorptivity, Reflectance and Reality, hetware, 03:31
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 03:08
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 01:54
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 01:39
- You should hire a digital photographer so you can post the links, T.J., Jeff…Relf, 01:28
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 01:14
- Lake_Washington it is., Jeff…Relf, 00:50
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 00:28
- Re: Why people think T.J. is a liar., tj Frazir, 00:17
- I'll probably be one lucky f_cker and T_Wake will have to eat his hat., Jeff…Relf, 00:16
- Rate of dissolving gases to water, stuomiva, 00:03
May 25, 2006
- Hammond never made any sense and can't answer anyone's questions., Jeff…Relf, 23:40
- Re: How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fill war..., tj Frazir, 23:38
- I'll send out the emails, in the next few days or so, I hope., Jeff…Relf, 23:30
- Re: T_Wake is a poor judge of character., tj Frazir, 23:19
- Why people think T.J. is a liar., Jeff…Relf, 22:52
- T.J. says, " I've loaded boats for 25 years. ", Jeff…Relf, 22:35
- T.J. writes in a way that often makes no sense at first., Jeff…Relf, 21:57
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 21:41
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 21:14
- Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 21:02
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, The Sorcerer, 21:01
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), The Sorcerer, 20:49
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 46: Why the Universe Operates Via Probability, OsherD, 20:42
- Disproof of Quantum Decoherence, wate, 20:41
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 46: Why the Universe Operates Via Probability, Yotteru?, 20:39
- Re: Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 20:36
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 46: Why the Universe Operates Via Probability, OsherD, 20:02
- Heavy ions feel the squeeze, Sam Wormley, 19:25
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 19:21
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 19:12
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, The Sorcerer, 19:04
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, pete, 18:49
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 18:44
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 18:27
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 18:24
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 18:16
- Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 18:05
- Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 18:04
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 17:48
- Re: T_Wake is a poor judge of character., T Wake, 17:31
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 17:12
- Re: Why I selfishly spew irrelevant tripe into the astro newsgroups!, Nagas Larc, 17:10
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 17:05
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 17:01
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 16:54
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, puppet_sock, 16:41
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 16:31
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 16:29
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 16:26
- T_Wake is a poor judge of character., Jeff…Relf, 16:22
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 16:20
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 16:17
- Re: I'll send the emails... but I'd like some answers first., T Wake, 16:16
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 16:16
- Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, donstockbauer, 16:13
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 16:12
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Greg Hansen, 16:12
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 16:11
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, donstockbauer, 16:09
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 16:09
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 16:06
- Re: How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fill war..., Randy Poe, 16:05
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 16:05
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Greg Hansen, 16:04
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 16:01
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Greg Hansen, 16:01
- I'll send the emails... but I'd like some answers first., Jeff…Relf, 16:01
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 46: Why the Universe Operates Via Probability, OsherD, 16:00
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 15:58
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, mmeron, 15:57
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, vavroom, 15:56
- Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Randy Poe, 15:54
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 46: Why the Universe Operates Via Probability, OsherD, 15:51
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, nibblenot, 15:44
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 15:40
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:33
- Re: Conservation of Energy, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 15:29
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 15:26
- The moon is less dense than the earth, cooler., Jeff…Relf, 15:19
- This is a composite of _8_ exposures taken during 1991 - 1994., Jeff…Relf, 14:59
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, ghostwriter, 14:57
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Pooh Bear, 14:41
- Gregory_Hansen is the nicest and most informed guy I've seen here., Jeff…Relf, 14:34
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Ken Muldrew, 14:29
- Re: curses, T Wake, 14:25
- Re: Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Zero-G, 14:25
- Re: Let's face it, humans no good in space. Robots are the future, Zero-G, 14:15
- Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 14:09
- The Tech_Booms of the late 20's, late 60's and late 90's., Jeff…Relf, 14:04
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, mmeron, 13:59
- Did EinStein eat enough chocolat?, Jan Panteltje, 13:55
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Zod, General, 13:54
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 13:46
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, mmeron, 13:26
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 13:25
- Re: How the _Hell_ does the monkey light it ?, tj Frazir, 13:22
- Re: How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fill war..., tj Frazir, 13:05
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Golden Boar, 12:48
- Re: SpotMetals.COM/ss/09346ali.htm, tj Frazir, 12:46
- Re: Conservation of Energy, mmeron, 12:45
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, The Sorcerer, 12:40
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, The Sorcerer, 12:37
- Re: Don't be surprized if our grand experiment fails., tj Frazir, 12:29
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:28
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 12:27
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, tj Frazir, 12:16
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, ghostwriter, 12:05
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, Richard Herring, 12:04
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, Richard Herring, 12:02
- Re: Blackbodies, Emissivity, Absorptivity, Reflectance and Reality, hetware, 11:57
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 11:37
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Jumbie, 11:32
- Re: Let's face it, humans no good in space. Robots are the future, Jumbie, 11:30
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:29
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 11:23
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, 2, 11:15
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, 2, 11:08
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 10:57
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:27
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:25
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 10:25
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 10:19
- Re: Blackbodies, Emissivity, Absorptivity, Reflectance and Reality, Andy Resnick, 10:14
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, SAIL4EVR, 10:13
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 10:04
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, SAIL4EVR, 09:48
- Let's face it, humans no good in space. Robots are the future, FED UP, 09:41
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:38
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, The Sorcerer, 09:29
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Greg Neill, 09:24
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, PD, 09:22
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Randy Poe, 09:15
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:14
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 09:00
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 09:00
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, SAIL4EVR, 09:00
- Re: leverian method of approximations, dedanoe, 08:59
- Re: Conservation of Energy, The Sorcerer, 08:58
- "The Error in Relativistic Physics", Kalb, 08:58
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, SAIL4EVR, 08:54
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 08:33
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 08:29
- Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, Dirk Van de moortel, 08:27
- Re: Moon can supply our energy needs for ever, Rene Tschaggelar, 08:27
- Re: Anomalous "memory" effects, Greg Neill, 08:21
- Re: How the _Hell_ does the monkey light it ?, T Wake, 08:08
- Re: How many ..., T Wake, 08:07
- Re: Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 08:07
- Re: How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fill warehouses ?, T Wake, 08:07
- Anomalous "memory" effects, top9, 08:06
- Re: Don't be surprized if our grand experiment fails., T Wake, 08:05
- Re: T.J. advocates/practices the purchase and management of huge ships., T Wake, 08:04
- Re: You can run X.EXE yourself on Win_XP., T Wake, 07:49
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 07:28
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 07:22
- Probabilities, Jan Panteltje, 07:22
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, jmfbahciv, 07:15
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, The Sorcerer, 07:00
- Re: Gravitational radiation, CrankHater, 06:51
- Re: T.J. advocates/practices the purchase and management of huge ships., CrankHater, 06:50
- Re: T.J. obviously buys and sells huge ships., CrankHater, 06:48
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, CrankHater, 06:46
- Hey. something makes sense here: It is the Teacher, it is the hands on., Jan Panteltje, 06:39
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, The Sorcerer, 06:26
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, The Sorcerer, 06:24
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, Helmut Wabnig, 06:16
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:04
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 06:00
- Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, jmfbahciv, 05:40
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, jmfbahciv, 05:37
- Re: Physics is dead!, The Sorcerer, 05:24
- Re: Physics is dead!, The Sorcerer, 05:24
- Re: Can someone explain how women work?, CWatters, 04:53
- Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 04:22
- Can someone explain how women work?, Albert Zweistein, 04:15
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 03:08
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 45.1: Forces in Opposite Directions, OsherD, 02:46
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 02:42
- Re: Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, vavroom, 02:39
- Help with a "basic" problem - force of impact?, vavroom, 02:35
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 45: The "Push" of "Space/Time", OsherD, 02:13
- Re: Conservation of Energy, mmeron, 01:25
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 01:19
- SpotMetals.COM/ss/09346ali.htm, Jeff…Relf, 01:18
- Re: WHY'S GOD AS COOL AS A CUCUMBER?, George, 01:14
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Jumbie, 01:12
- Re: WHY'S GOD AS COOL AS A CUCUMBER?, edconrad, 01:01
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 00:59
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 00:56
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 00:52
- T.J., you're an uber _Lazy_ writer, omitting _Vital_ context., Jeff…Relf, 00:50
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 00:32
- Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, donstockbauer, 00:18
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 00:17
- Re: WHY'S GOD AS COOL AS A CUCUMBER?, donstockbauer, 00:16
- Re: Give me a few days to think about it., tj Frazir, 00:13
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 00:07
- Don't be surprized if our grand experiment fails., Jeff…Relf, 00:03
May 24, 2006
- Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?, Radium, 23:55
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, 2, 23:20
- Re: Give me a few days to think about it., tj Frazir, 23:16
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 22:58
- Re: T.J. advocates/practices the purchase and management of huge sh..., tj Frazir, 22:56
- Re: How the _Hell_ does the monkey light it ?, tj Frazir, 22:38
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo Nieminen, 22:31
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Timo Nieminen, 22:21
- Re: How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fill war..., tj Frazir, 22:14
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, mmeron, 22:14
- Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, Herman Rubin, 22:12
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 22:10
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, The Sorcerer, 22:08
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Henning Makholm, 21:51
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 21:23
- How many 10 year olds _Strongly_ advocate borrowing to fill warehouses ?, Jeff…Relf, 21:17
- Give me a few days to think about it., Jeff…Relf, 21:06
- On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, yinbing-zhou, 21:02
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Greg Hansen, 21:01
- How the _Hell_ does the monkey light it ?, Jeff…Relf, 20:50
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Henning Makholm, 20:48
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Matt, 20:37
- T.J. advocates/practices the purchase and management of huge ships., Jeff…Relf, 20:10
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 19:56
- You can run X.EXE yourself on Win_XP., Jeff…Relf, 19:44
- Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 19:39
- Blackbodies, Emissivity, Absorptivity, Reflectance and Reality, hetware, 19:39
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 19:17
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 19:04
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 18:57
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 18:52
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, CWatters, 18:42
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 18:30
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), fkasner, 18:19
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 18:14
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, jimp, 17:45
- Re: Define Temperature, hetware, 17:32
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 17:15
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 17:11
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 17:03
- Re: T.J., you should post some pictures., T Wake, 17:02
- Re: T.J., you should post some pictures., T Wake, 17:01
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 16:59
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 16:55
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 16:55
- Re: T.J., you should post some pictures., tj Frazir, 16:46
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 16:45
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 16:43
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Randy Poe, 16:43
- Re: 60 thousand tons of aluminum ingots ? you've got to be kidding., tj Frazir, 16:35
- Re: WHO KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR?, Mike, 16:33
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 16:33
- Re: Bull ! Monkeys can't roll/light cigarettes or trade them for c..., tj Frazir, 16:30
- Re: Why would a huge producer like Rusal.COM trust someone like me?, T Wake, 16:29
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, T Wake, 16:28
- Re: T.J., you should post some pictures., tj Frazir, 16:22
- Re: 60 thousand tons of aluminum ingots ? you've got to be kidding., T Wake, 16:21
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 16:19
- Re: Why would a huge producer like Rusal.COM trust someone like me ?, tj Frazir, 16:19
- Re: = eScrew code = 0 = emptiness = 1 = unity = 2 = duality = 3 = nirvana = 4 = love = 5 = time = 6 = war = 7 = perfection = 8 = eternity = 9 = judgment = eScrew code controls all computer systems on earth!!!, donstockbauer, 16:16
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, tj Frazir, 16:14
- Re: curses, donstockbauer, 16:13
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 16:10
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:08
- 60 thousand tons of aluminum ingots ? you've got to be kidding., Jeff…Relf, 16:07
- Re: Bull ! Monkeys can't roll/light cigarettes or trade them for cash., T Wake, 15:58
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 15:55
- Bull ! Monkeys can't roll/light cigarettes or trade them for cash., Jeff…Relf, 15:45
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:44
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 15:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 15:43
- Re: T.J., you should post some pictures., T Wake, 15:43
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), ghostwriter, 15:42
- Re: T.J. obviously buys and sells huge ships., T Wake, 15:41
- Re: T.J. obviously buys and sells huge ships., Randy Poe, 15:37
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 15:36
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Craig Markwardt, 15:33
- Re: VS is just the best editor in existence, that's all., Anal Fissure, 15:32
- Re: VS is just the best editor in existence, that's all., Anal Fissure, 15:31
- T.J., you should post some pictures., Jeff…Relf, 15:25
- T.J. obviously buys and sells huge ships., Jeff…Relf, 15:19
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 15:19
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 15:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 15:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 15:13
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, Jan Panteltje, 15:07
- Re: Conservation of Energy, frank_k_sheldon, 14:39
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 14:35
- Re: How did the monkeys carry the water ? any pics ?, T Wake, 14:31
- Re: Tall_Tales with _No_ external evidence., T Wake, 14:27
- Re: What I actually said about T_Wake., T Wake, 14:26
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, CWatters, 14:24
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), The Sorcerer, 14:23
- Re: Gravitational radiation, T Wake, 14:21
- Re: I randomly see a TV anywhere... _Very_ randomly., T Wake, 14:17
- Re: curses, T Wake, 14:10
- Re: Why would a huge producer like Rusal.COM trust someone like me ?, T Wake, 14:10
- Ok T.J., that sounds good... but I need a day or two to think it over., Jeff…Relf, 14:06
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 14:02
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, The Sorcerer, 13:57
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 13:57
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, Igor, 13:55
- Tall_Tales with _No_ external evidence., Jeff…Relf, 13:54
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Golden Boar, 13:53
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Golden Boar, 13:52
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), PV, 13:52
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), PV, 13:50
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 45: The "Push" of "Space/Time", Jumbie, 13:50
- Re: Electron radiation as gravity. Electroshine?, The Sorcerer, 13:49
- Kepler, oriel36, 13:48
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 13:45
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, CWatters, 13:41
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Dan Bloomquist, 13:41
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 13:34
- I think the economy will bottom out around 2015., Jeff…Relf, 13:32
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 13:30
- Re: Gravitational radiation, Igor, 13:23
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, Igor, 13:20
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, 2, 13:16
- What I actually said about T_Wake., Jeff…Relf, 13:08
- Re: I'm going to be rich, Rich, _Rich_ !, tj Frazir, 13:05
- Re: NANOPARTICLES, Andy Resnick, 13:02
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Randy Poe, 13:00
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:59
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Golden Boar, 12:57
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 12:51
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, dda1, 12:50
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:49
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 12:47
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 12:46
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 12:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:43
- Re: How did the monkeys carry the water ? any pics ?, tj Frazir, 12:40
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, Jan Panteltje, 12:31
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 12:30
- = eScrew code = 0 = emptiness = 1 = unity = 2 = duality = 3 = nirvana = 4 = love = 5 = time = 6 = war = 7 = perfection = 8 = eternity = 9 = judgment = eScrew code controls all computer systems on earth!!!, escrewzen, 12:26
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 12:26
- Re: I'm going to be rich, Rich, _Rich_ !, T Wake, 12:21
- Re: Who you are and who you know., T Wake, 12:20
- Re: How did the monkeys carry the water ? any pics ?, tj Frazir, 12:18
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, neo, 12:18
- Re: Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 12:14
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, Greg Hansen, 12:13
- Re: Why would a huge producer like Rusal.COM trust someone like me ?, tj Frazir, 12:11
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 12:09
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Randy Poe, 12:05
- Re: Who you are and who you know., tj Frazir, 12:02
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, Greg Hansen, 11:56
- Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, tj Frazir, 11:55
- Re: Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _X_Report_, CrankHater, 11:51
- Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, tj Frazir, 11:51
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 11:48
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 11:48
- Re: How did the monkeys carry the water ? any pics ?, CrankHater, 11:48
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, tj Frazir, 11:43
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 11:43
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 11:39
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, The Sorcerer, 11:38
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, The Sorcerer, 11:38
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), The Sorcerer, 11:38
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Greg Hansen, 11:33
- Electron radiation as gravity. Electroshine?, ma1ibu, 11:30
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 11:26
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 11:26
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Greg Hansen, 11:22
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Greg Hansen, 11:16
- "WORLDS IN COLLISION" -- Velikovsky's Masterpiece, edconrad, 11:12
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, Jan Panteltje, 11:10
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 11:06
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 11:05
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 10:59
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 10:57
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), PV, 10:40
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:39
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 10:37
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), PV, 10:35
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:24
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:23
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:22
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:21
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, neo, 10:20
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, neo, 10:14
- Re: Unidentified line in sky, Jan Panteltje, 10:04
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 10:04
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 10:03
- "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Kalb, 10:02
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, galt_57, 09:59
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 09:50
- Unidentified line in sky, neo, 09:50
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Double-A, 09:49
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Henry Spencer, 09:45
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 09:19
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 09:10
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 09:03
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 08:56
- Re: Gravitational radiation, donstockbauer, 08:45
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, John Bailey, 08:36
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 08:30
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, Mike, 08:28
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 08:26
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 08:20
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 08:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 08:13
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Paul Schlyter, 08:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 08:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 08:13
- Gravitational radiation, electro, 08:11
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, FED UP, 08:09
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 08:09
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Golden Boar, 07:51
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, zorrrrorobbbbinhood, 07:46
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 07:43
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 07:20
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 07:20
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 07:16
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., tapwater, 07:15
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 07:09
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:51
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 06:41
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Golden Boar, 06:24
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, Jan Panteltje, 06:18
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 05:56
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, Jan Panteltje, 05:53
- Re: Physics is dead!, Harry, 05:52
- searching for a string vibration response program on SCILAB, Hollywood, 05:52
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 05:46
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, tadchem, 05:45
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, Jan Panteltje, 05:45
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), The Sorcerer, 05:38
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, The Sorcerer, 05:38
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, john . midgley, 05:17
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Sjouke Burry, 05:14
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., mmeron, 05:11
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Mark-T, 05:01
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Mark-T, 04:57
- Re: Physics is dead!, The Sorcerer, 04:32
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Craig Markwardt, 04:28
- Re: Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, platopes, 04:11
- Re: reductionist science, platopes, 03:16
- Re: Physics is dead!, platopes, 03:08
- Re: reductionist science, Helmut Wabnig, 03:08
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 45: The "Push" of "Space/Time", OsherD, 02:56
- Re: Physics is dead!, John Christiansen, 02:48
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, FrediFizzx, 02:43
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 02:42
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, FrediFizzx, 02:35
- Re: Conservation of Energy, frank_k_sheldon, 02:27
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 02:25
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 02:23
- The Pattern of Tiny Feet, platopes, 02:18
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 02:13
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, FrediFizzx, 02:13
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 02:02
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 02:02
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, mmeron, 02:02
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 01:58
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, noshellswill, 01:51
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 01:45
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 01:31
- Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Brad Guth, 01:30
- green's functions, vicky shaw, 01:22
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, jowr . pi, 01:12
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 00:55
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 00:55
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, dda1, 00:44
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 00:32
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 00:21
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 00:19
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 00:12
May 23, 2006
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 23:56
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 44: Universe-Generating Theorem, Afropop@xxxxxxxxxx, 23:41
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, Edgar A Pearlstein, 23:36
- VS is just the best editor in existence, that's all., Jeff…Relf, 23:29
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 23:18
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, John C . Polasek, 23:15
- How did the monkeys carry the water ? any pics ?, Jeff…Relf, 23:15
- Re: Why I selfishly post code., Anal Fissure, 23:07
- Why would a huge producer like Rusal.COM trust someone like me ?, Jeff…Relf, 23:06
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 22:59
- Re: I'm going to be rich, Rich, _Rich_ !, tj Frazir, 22:57
- Who you are and who you know., Jeff…Relf, 22:46
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, donstockbauer, 22:38
- Re: Did T.J. dream it ?, tj Frazir, 22:37
- Re: I'm going to be rich, Rich, _Rich_ !, tj Frazir, 22:30
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 22:28
- Why I selfishly post code., Jeff…Relf, 22:26
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Edward Green, 22:22
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, tj Frazir, 22:22
- MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE, ACE, 22:20
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), lucasea, 22:12
- Re: I randomly see a TV anywhere... _Very_ randomly., Jeff…Relf, 22:11
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Paul Cardinale, 22:01
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 21:54
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 21:45
- Re: Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, Sam Wormley, 21:13
- Where does the Schrodinger Equation come from???, mike3, 21:07
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), fkasner, 21:01
- potential due to a disc, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 20:48
- Re: green's function in a hemisphere, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 20:42
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 44: Universe-Generating Theorem, OsherD, 20:34
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Eric Gisse, 20:11
- Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 20:00
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Timo Nieminen, 19:58
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, The Sorcerer, 19:49
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 19:48
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, Tony, 19:48
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 44: Universe-Generating Theorem, OsherD, 19:15
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 19:13
- Re: An unprecedents proofe the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, dda1, 19:05
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 44: Universe-Generating Theorem, OsherD, 19:05
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, dda1, 19:05
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, dda1, 19:04
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, dda1, 19:03
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 18:57
- Re: Physics is dead!, dda1, 18:57
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, The Sorcerer, 18:57
- I'm going to be rich, Rich, _Rich_ !, Jeff…Relf, 18:41
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 18:36
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 18:26
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo Nieminen, 18:20
- Re: Gagnonrchrd is using FireFox on Win_98 !, Jeff…Relf, 18:19
- Re: Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _X_Report_, T Wake, 18:16
- Re: Lookup Jeff_Relf_2006_May_23_CrQo@xxxxxxxxx in Google., T Wake, 18:14
- Lookup Jeff_Relf_2006_May_23_CrQo@xxxxxxxxx in Google., Jeff…Relf, 18:13
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), The Sorcerer, 18:12
- Re: Gagnonrchrd is using FireFox on Win_98 !, Golden Boar, 18:05
- Re: Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _X_Report_, Jeff…Relf, 18:04
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 17:52
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 17:50
- Re: Physics is dead!, PD, 17:47
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, galt_57, 17:46
- Re: Physics is dead!, PD, 17:43
- Re: curses, Richard Tobin, 17:41
- Re: Point blank, omniscience and omnipotence means _No_ free will., T Wake, 17:40
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, John C . Polasek, 17:38
- Point blank, omniscience and omnipotence means _No_ free will., Jeff…Relf, 17:31
- Re: Stars consume, a lit match consumes... it's not true free will., Starlord, 17:29
- Re: Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _X_Report_, T Wake, 17:25
- Re: Gagnonrchrd is using FireFox on Win_98 !, T Wake, 17:25
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 17:24
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), David Bostwick, 17:23
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), PV, 17:18
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, OG, 17:16
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), PV, 17:16
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 17:13
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), AZ Nomad, 17:11
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), AZ Nomad, 17:08
- Re: Why Lambda_CDM is the standard model., T Wake, 17:07
- Re: curses, T Wake, 17:00
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, FrediFizzx, 16:58
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 16:57
- Re: Where's true free will ?, T Wake, 16:56
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Sam Wormley, 16:53
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 16:50
- Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _X_Report_, Jeff…Relf, 16:48
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Sam Wormley, 16:47
- Re: How hard can a human suck?, PD, 16:47
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 16:46
- Gagnonrchrd is using FireFox on Win_98 !, Jeff…Relf, 16:44
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, mmeron, 16:36
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, John C . Polasek, 16:30
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, galt_57, 16:26
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 16:18
- How hard can a human suck?, john . midgley, 16:08
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:05
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:00
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 15:56
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 15:50
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, mmeron, 15:46
- Re: Physics is dead!, dda1, 15:45
- Re: Physics is dead!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:40
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 15:40
- Re: Conservation of Energy, frank_k_sheldon, 15:29
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, PD, 15:25
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), David Bostwick, 15:15
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 15:06
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, FrediFizzx, 15:05
- Re: Physics is dead!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:01
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Jan Panteltje, 14:59
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 14:49
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 14:43
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Henning Makholm, 14:32
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, FrediFizzx, 14:31
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), dave . harper, 14:16
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Madalch, 14:04
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 13:47
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 13:44
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 13:42
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Golden Boar, 13:36
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, PD, 13:33
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Golden Boar, 13:32
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), dave . harper, 13:31
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 13:20
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, Igor, 13:20
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 13:13
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:11
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 13:10
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 13:10
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), dgp, 13:09
- Re: reductionist science, Igor, 13:07
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, CWatters, 13:07
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 13:06
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 13:04
- Why Lambda_CDM is the standard model., Jeff…Relf, 13:04
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), David Bostwick, 13:01
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Don Lancaster, 12:58
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 12:57
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 12:54
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 12:52
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 12:51
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., John Zinni, 12:48
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:47
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:47
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:40
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:36
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 12:34
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 12:18
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:14
- Re: Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), Sam Wormley, 12:14
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:11
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 12:07
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, The Sorcerer, 11:53
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, The Sorcerer, 11:53
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, Jim Black, 11:53
- Re: reductionist science, uri, 11:52
- Re: Precession and Evolution, klaudiozic, 11:50
- Properties of HHO (aka Aquygen, Brown's Gas, Klein's gas, etc), dave . harper, 11:45
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, dedanoe, 11:23
- Re: Physics is dead!, dedanoe, 11:20
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:18
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Double-A, 11:01
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, Henning Makholm, 10:58
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Paul Schlyter, 10:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 10:43
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 10:41
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 10:33
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 10:27
- Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws, actionintegral, 10:26
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, galt_57, 10:24
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 10:20
- Action Principle and Newton's Laws, joe_avery_2005, 10:17
- Re: Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, Sam Wormley, 10:17
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 10:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 10:13
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:09
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Golden Boar, 10:05
- Double slit experiment -- and the spooky results, galt_57, 10:03
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 09:59
- Largest Map of Universe Yet Bolsters Theories about Dark Energ, Sam Wormley, 09:48
- Finding Common Ground in the U.S. Math Wars, Sam Wormley, 09:33
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 09:31
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 09:23
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 09:10
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, CWatters, 09:03
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, CWatters, 09:02
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, actionintegral, 08:55
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Herb Martin, 08:51
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, CWatters, 08:42
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., John Zinni, 08:40
- Is More Than One Quark Needed?, Kalb, 08:24
- Is More Than One Quark Needed?, Kalb, 08:23
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, jmfbahciv, 07:58
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, jmfbahciv, 07:57
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 07:56
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 07:54
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 07:53
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 07:52
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Eric Gisse, 07:45
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 07:20
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 07:19
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, jowr . pi, 07:11
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 07:11
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 07:07
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Eric Gisse, 07:00
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 06:59
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 06:51
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 06:47
- Re: "The Arrow of Time", Sam Wormley, 06:45
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 06:12
- Re: Physics is dead!, The Sorcerer, 06:06
- druge flashback, asdf, 06:01
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 05:48
- Re: Physics is dead!, Harry, 05:28
- Golden buckyball like structures of only 16 gold atoms., Jan Panteltje, 05:08
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 04:55
- Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, The Sorcerer, 04:48
- Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, The Sorcerer, 04:48
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 04:48
- Re: "The Arrow of Time", kunzmilan, 04:39
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 04:36
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 04:34
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 04:34
- Re: THE REAL FRUSTRATION OF ALBERT EINSTEIN, donstockbauer, 04:19
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, karensbasketry, 04:18
- Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities, donstockbauer, 03:56
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 03:42
- Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Brad Guth, 03:30
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 03:26
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 03:17
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 03:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 03:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 03:13
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 03:05
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 02:55
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 02:50
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, koobee . wublee, 02:39
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 02:35
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 02:13
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo Nieminen, 01:52
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Eric Gisse, 01:46
- Re: WHY ALL BODIES "FALL" AT THE SAME RATE, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:45
- green's function in a hemisphere, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 01:44
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 01:41
- Re: WHY ALL BODIES "FALL" AT THE SAME RATE, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:39
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 01:38
- Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:37
- Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:35
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 01:30
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 01:20
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 01:20
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 01:19
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 01:18
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 01:17
- Re: Where's true free will ?, Denis Loubet, 01:11
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 01:08
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 01:07
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 01:05
- Re: An unprecedented proof the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 01:05
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 01:03
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 01:01
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 00:59
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 00:59
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 00:58
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 00:53
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, koobee . wublee, 00:50
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 00:48
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, koobee . wublee, 00:46
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 00:32
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 00:28
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 00:24
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 00:24
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 00:24
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 00:24
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, Timo Nieminen, 00:09
May 22, 2006
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 23:49
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 23:37
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 23:35
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 22:48
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 22:45
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Sam Wormley, 22:30
- Re: An unprecedents proofe the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Eric Gisse, 22:28
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, mmeron, 22:25
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 22:24
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 22:23
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 22:10
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, Dan in Philly, 21:56
- Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, actionintegral, 21:50
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, John C . Polasek, 21:36
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 21:31
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, Dan in Philly, 21:28
- Re: questions about electron natural frequency, Jim Black, 20:45
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 20:42
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, Timo Nieminen, 20:31
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, actionintegral, 20:23
- Re: Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, actionintegral, 20:21
- Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, actionintegral, 20:18
- Re: New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 22, 2006, yinbing-zhou, 19:59
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 19:52
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 19:42
- Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer, Dan in Philly, 19:40
- new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, yinbing-zhou, 19:37
- Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 19:31
- Re: Physics is dead!, dda1, 19:30
- Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, The Sorcerer, 19:10
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Henry Spencer, 19:05
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Ken S. Tucker, 18:53
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 18:34
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Henry Spencer, 18:07
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, PD, 17:36
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 17:15
- Re: Bye Bye anthropic principle ! nice to have known ya., T Wake, 17:14
- Re: The temperature of water/life is nothing special., T Wake, 17:10
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 17:07
- Islamization of the Palestinians - Brave NUKE World, Ha-Emet, 17:05
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., The Sorcerer, 16:50
- Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 16:44
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., The Sorcerer, 16:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 16:40
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Randy Poe, 16:39
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 16:35
- Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, actionintegral, 16:33
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Jeff Root, 16:27
- Re: A big if., T Wake, 16:25
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, FrediFizzx, 16:24
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 16:24
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, CWatters, 16:24
- Re: I don't _Schmooze_ with aluminum producers., T Wake, 16:22
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Sam Wormley, 16:19
- Re: T.J. is an über optimistic/enthusiastic hound dog., T Wake, 16:17
- Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, T Wake, 16:16
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., FrediFizzx, 16:14
- Re: Get a _Real_ job, idiot., T Wake, 16:09
- Re: Did T.J. dream it ?, T Wake, 16:08
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 16:07
- Re: Alt. Wit.Jeff-Relf, T Wake, 16:07
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:07
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, FrediFizzx, 16:06
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:05
- Re: The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Jeff Root, 16:03
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 15:59
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 15:59
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 15:49
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 15:43
- The other focus? was Re: Sun calculates to be less massive..., Mark-T, 15:32
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 15:23
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 15:20
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 15:19
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 15:05
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, 281979, 15:02
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 14:55
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, PD, 14:39
- "The Properties of the Aether", Kalb, 14:18
- Re: reductionist science, Igor, 13:45
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 13:27
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 13:20
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 13:15
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 13:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:52
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Sam Wormley, 12:24
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 12:14
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 12:06
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 11:46
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jim Lillie, 11:44
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 11:41
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 11:30
- Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, Richard Saam, 11:01
- Re: How much charge does it take?, mmeron, 10:59
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 10:59
- Re: Triboelectric amplifiers, swu, 10:55
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Bilge, 10:54
- Re: Möbius at the Shopping Mall, Sam Wormley, 10:53
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, The Sorcerer, 10:43
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 10:36
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 10:33
- Re: Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 10:26
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 09:55
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, John C . Polasek, 09:28
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, J.F. Cornwall, 09:01
- Re: Cellular ether theory (large TeX), Andreas Most, 08:51
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Richard Herring, 08:41
- Re: Physicists Wanted for collaboration, Douglas Eagleson, 08:24
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, The Sorcerer, 08:21
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Sorcerer, 08:15
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 08:13
- Re: Atheists *HATE* Intelligent Design (was: Check out the "Top 10 Questions"), B1ackwater, 08:09
- Re: New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 22, 2006, yinbing-zhou, 08:00
- ---> VOTING UPDATE <--- HELP SMITHSONIAN CHOOSE A BRAND-NEW LOGO -- Based on Its Scientific Integrity -- Evolution -- Why, I'll Be a Uncle's Monkey!, Ed Conrad, 07:59
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, The Sorcerer, 07:55
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, The Sorcerer, 07:43
- Re: reductionist science, donstockbauer, 07:42
- Re: Relative speed..., The Sorcerer, 07:33
- Re: Validity of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, jmfbahciv, 07:05
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, jmfbahciv, 06:59
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, jmfbahciv, 06:55
- Re: Triboelectric amplifiers, John Bailey, 06:54
- Re: Möbius at the Shopping Mall, Henning Makholm, 06:51
- Re: How much charge does it take?, Henning Makholm, 06:51
- Re: Physics is dead!, Harry, 06:44
- Re: An unprecedents proofe the the photon has a nonzero *rest mass* !, Y.Porat, 06:31
- leverian method of approximations, dedanoe, 06:18
- Re: Physics is dead!, Henri Wilson, 05:51
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, tadchem, 05:41
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 22, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:40
- Re: curses, Richard Herring, 05:39
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Jan Panteltje, 05:32
- Re: WARNING Sam Wormhole Fails Turing Test, Dirk Van de Androcles, 05:28
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 04:39
- reductionist science, electro, 04:08
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, CWatters, 03:44
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 03:44
- Re: capacitance of a rectangular box, CWatters, 03:33
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 03:27
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 03:04
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 02:56
- capacitance of a rectangular box, physicsbumpkin@xxxxxxxxx, 02:52
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 02:33
- Re: Physicists Wanted for collaboration, Helmut Wabnig, 02:17
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, koobee . wublee, 01:12
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization Labelling Typo: 43.3, J karumbia, 00:58
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 00:23
- Re: Atheists *HATE* Intelligent Design (was: Check out the "Top 10 Questions"), Lizz Holmans, 00:08
May 21, 2006
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, koobee . wublee, 23:57
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization Labelling Typo: 43.3, OsherD, 23:43
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Remarkable Super-Median Orbit, OsherD, 23:35
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Remarkable Super-Median Orbit, J Kraambala, 23:30
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Llanzlan Klazmon, 23:16
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 23:11
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 22:50
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Remarkable Super-Median Orbit, OsherD, 22:16
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Remarkable Super-Median Orbit, OsherD, 22:08
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 22:05
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Remarkable Super-Median Orbit, OsherD, 21:47
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 21:46
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Remarkable Super-Median Orbit, OsherD, 21:42
- Re: Physicists Wanted for collaboration, atxinter, 21:32
- Unifying the observed forces., Jeff…Relf, 20:57
- The temperature of water/life is nothing special., Jeff…Relf, 20:41
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Eric Gisse, 20:16
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 19:44
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Llanzlan Klazmon, 19:37
- Re: The Quarks Inside Protons Pop In and Out of Existence, Sam Wormley, 19:26
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Charles, 19:24
- Re: The Quarks Inside Protons Pop In and Out of Existence, Sam Wormley, 19:19
- The Quarks Inside Protons Pop In and Out of Existence, mandotar, 19:09
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Dirk Van de Androcles, 19:02
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
- Re: Relative speed..., The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Sam Wormley, 18:59
- Re: Physicists Wanted for collaboration, Dirk Van de Androcles, 18:31
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 18:24
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 18:14
- Re: Physicists Wanted for collaboration, gjedwards, 17:48
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 17:41
- Definition of entropy of macrosystem, Sergey Karavashkin, 17:26
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 17:15
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, Dirk Van de Androcles, 17:12
- What quantity or quantities have units of kg s m^-1 ?, Golden Boar, 17:11
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 17:11
- Re: Physicists Wanted for collaboration, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 16:58
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 16:47
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 16:40
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 16:15
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Mike, 16:07
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Dirk Van de Androcles, 16:04
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 15:56
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 15:50
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, tadchem, 15:50
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 15:44
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, tadchem, 15:41
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, tadchem, 15:39
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Craig Markwardt, 15:38
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Koobee Wublee, 15:32
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 15:11
- Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 15:05
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 15:00
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 14:50
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Sam Wormley, 14:41
- Horror Theory of Physics Creativity 2: Revision of Some of My Ideas, OsherD, 14:40
- Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Igor, 14:29
- Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 14:25
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, tadchem, 14:12
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, Dirk Van de Androcles, 14:05
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43.1: Orbits of Complicated Probable Influence/Causation, OsherD, 14:02
- Re: FRAUD IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS, Dirk Van de Androcles, 13:49
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 13:38
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Igor, 13:37
- Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon, Brad Guth, 13:37
- Physicists Wanted for collaboration, atxinter, 13:36
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Igor, 13:33
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Greg Hansen, 12:59
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 12:32
- Re: Physics is dead!, Vert, 12:14
- Re: Theoretical experiment on relativity, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Herb Martin, 11:53
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 11:53
- Re: Relative speed..., Dirk Van de Androcles, 11:45
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Jan Panteltje, 11:45
- Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", BernardZ, 11:22
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 11:14
- Re: curses, Bert Hickman, 11:09
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 43: Orbits of Probable Influence/Causation, OsherD, 11:09
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:56
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:53
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:52
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Steve Ralph, 10:27
- "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Moc, 09:41
- Re: How much charge does it take?, Hexenmeister, 09:26
- Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 08:12
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Craig Markwardt, 07:25
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 06:54
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Charles, 06:27
- Re: Is Physics true?, Hexenmeister, 06:17
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, jmfbahciv, 06:04
- Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, Craig Markwardt, 05:59
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Peter Christensen, 05:55
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, Hexenmeister, 05:42
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, Hexenmeister, 05:42
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, Hexenmeister, 05:36
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 05:26
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 05:26
- Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, Bob Cain, 04:07
- COUMARIN DYE, oshrat.harush@xxxxxxxxx, 03:58
- Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, Ioannis, 03:57
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 03:48
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Peter Christensen, 03:42
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 02:26
- Re: Physics is dead!, noshellswill, 00:52
- Re: Is Physics true?, Sue..., 00:40
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 00:30
- Re: Is Physics true?, FrediFizzx, 00:25
May 20, 2006
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, J. F. Cornwall, 23:59
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Brad Guth, 23:56
- Theoretical experiment on relativity, drme1981@xxxxxxxxx, 23:32
- Theoretical experiment on relativity, drme1981@xxxxxxxxx, 23:32
- Re: How much charge does it take?, Greg Neill, 23:29
- Re: How much charge does it take?, mmeron, 23:27
- Re: eMailing global producers., tdp1001, 23:06
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 22:57
- I don't _Schmooze_ with aluminum producers., Jeff…Relf, 22:53
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 22:50
- Re: Is Physics true?, jimp, 22:45
- Re: Physics is dead!, jimp, 22:45
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 22:41
- How much charge does it take?, mike3, 22:32
- Re: Physics is dead!, dedanoe, 22:27
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 22:17
- Re: young at heart fear not, dedanoe, 22:13
- dedanoe talks crystalization, dedanoe, 22:11
- Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, dedanoe, 22:10
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, cnctut, 21:58
- Re: Is Physics true?, RadicalLibertarian, 21:49
- Re: eMailing global producers., tj Frazir, 21:32
- Re: eMailing global producers., tj Frazir, 21:29
- The temperature of water/life is nothing special., Jeff…Relf, 21:15
- Re: Is Physics true?, shevek, 20:49
- Re: Physics is dead!, shevek, 20:31
- Re: Physics is dead!, Tom Roberts, 20:06
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Edward Green, 19:57
- eMailing global producers., Jeff…Relf, 19:39
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Edward Green, 19:27
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 19:20
- Re: question about solid conductors, solid leg wires on detonators?, Edward Green, 19:15
- PK Dick, VALIS, History of Physics, PSI WARS!, Jack Sarfatti, 18:33
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 18:07
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 18:03
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, Hexenmeister, 17:57
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 17:49
- Re: Mvbius at the Shopping Mall, Hexenmeister, 17:47
- Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 17:17
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 17:14
- Re: Physics is dead!, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:13
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Dirk Van de moortel, 17:11
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 17:05
- Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 8: McCay Bivariate Gamma, OsherD, 17:03
- Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics, RadicalLibertarian, 16:50
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, tadchem, 16:26
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), tadchem, 16:04
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 16:00
- "The Arrow of Time", Moc, 15:58
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 15:51
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 15:33
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 15:32
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, 281979, 15:27
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 15:08
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, 281979, 15:07
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 15:07
- Re: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 15:03
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, 281979, 14:56
- Physics is dead!, neo, 14:51
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, 281979, 14:49
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Sam Wormley, 14:46
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, 281979, 14:29
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Herb Martin, 14:09
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Peter Christensen, 14:07
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Ken S. Tucker, 13:38
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 13:26
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Sam Wormley, 13:11
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: Computer Enhancement Reveals Pentagon Object Identity, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: Relative speed..., The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: Re: Möbius at the Shopping Mall, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 12:55
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Edward Green, 12:45
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 12:43
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 12:37
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Jan Panteltje, 12:31
- Re: WARNING Sam Wormhole Fails Turing Test, Sam Wormley, 12:28
- Re: Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 12:17
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 12:11
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 12:11
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Peter Christensen, 12:10
- Re: WARNING Sam Wormhole Fails Turing Test, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:03
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
- Re: Cellular ether theory (large TeX), The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
- Re: Relative speed..., Dirk Van de moortel, 11:58
- Re: Relative speed..., Hexenmeister, 11:37
- Re: Relative speed..., Hexenmeister, 11:35
- Re: WARNING Sam Wormhole Fails Turing Test, Sam Wormley, 11:34
- Re: 67,000 ships moved out of the way for China's Typhoon Chanchu, tj Frazir, 11:29
- Re: T.J., do you approve of this wording ?, tj Frazir, 11:20
- Re: T.J., do you approve of this wording ?, tj Frazir, 11:15
- WARNING Sam Wormhole Fails Turing Test, Jan Panteltje, 11:05
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 11:00
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 11:00
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Jan Panteltje, 10:57
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 10:54
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 10:50
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 10:48
- Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, tadchem, 10:46
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 10:42
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, tadchem, 10:32
- The Jesus Christ Code. ©, caesarjbsquitti, 10:32
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 10:30
- Re: Möbius at the Shopping Mall, Sam Wormley, 10:20
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), tadchem, 10:20
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Chip Eastham, 10:05
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 10:04
- Re: Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 09:57
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 09:52
- Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope, top9, 09:16
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 09:14
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 09:05
- boxes, STUARTe, 09:02
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", tomgee, 08:50
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", tomgee, 08:46
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", tomgee, 08:38
- Re: Möbius at the Shopping Mall, Paul Cardinale, 08:13
- Re: The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Paul Cardinale, 08:10
- RT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS BÖRJESSON, 07:18
- Computer Enhancement Reveals Pentagon Object Identity, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 07:10
- Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, Jan Panteltje, 06:03
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", oriel36, 06:00
- Re: Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, John Christiansen, 05:37
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", oriel36, 05:37
- Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, dedanoe, 05:21
- The 'FOFX-Paradox' (Math or Physics?), Peter Christensen, 05:20
- Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, dedanoe, 04:34
- young at heart fear not, dedanoe, 04:31
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 04:29
- Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, Bob Cain, 04:27
- Bra-Ket: How do physicists pronounce BRA?, Herb Martin, 03:56
- Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 03:08
- Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 02:36
- Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 02:10
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 02:09
- Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, David Morgan \(MAMS\), 02:06
- Re: Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 01:47
- Horror Theory of Physics Creativity, OsherD, 01:32
- Re: Quarks and gluons, ME, 00:43
- Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 19 May 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, OsherD, 00:30
May 19, 2006
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 7.1, OsherD, 23:57
- Möbius at the Shopping Mall, Sam Wormley, 23:48
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Sam Wormley, 23:42
- Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 7.1, OsherD, 23:24
- Re: Conservation of Energy, tdp1001, 23:10
- Re: question about solid conductors, solid leg wires on detonators?, tdp1001, 22:50
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, Greg Hansen, 22:36
- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 19 May 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 22:32
- Change of focus for liquid crystals, Sam Wormley, 22:31
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 7: Plackett Family Correlation, Jake, 22:19
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 7: Plackett Family Correlation, Jake, 22:18
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 7: Plackett Family Correlation, OsherD, 20:52
- T.J., do you approve of this wording ?, Jeff…Relf, 20:46
- Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 7: Plackett Family Correlation, OsherD, 20:36
- Re: Smearing sh_t all over the walls... on top of the graffiti., tj Frazir, 20:04
- Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less., Sam Wormley, 20:03
- Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, houlepn, 20:01
- Re: Apparently, it's ok to monkeys..., dda1, 19:45
- Bye Bye anthropic principle ! nice to have known ya., Jeff…Relf, 19:37
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Mike, 19:29
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 19:12
- Re: Relative speed..., OG, 19:07
- Re: questions about electron natural frequency, PD, 18:12
- Re: Conservation of Energy, PD, 18:09
- Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:59
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Jan Panteltje, 17:42
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 17:39
- Re: Relative speed..., Dirk Van de moortel, 17:37
- Re: Relative speed..., Sam Wormley, 17:35
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 17:33
- Relative speed..., Externet, 17:25
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Jan Panteltje, 17:24
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 17:15
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 17:10
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 May 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 17:02
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Hexenmeister, 17:02
- Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:57
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Mike, 16:49
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 16:45
- Re: Apparently, it's ok to monkeys..., donstockbauer, 16:26
- Re: Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, Mike, 16:19
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Hexenmeister, 15:53
- Re: Conservation of Energy, mmeron, 15:52
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 15:48
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, ma1ibu, 15:46
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, Hexenmeister, 15:43
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Ken S. Tucker, 15:42
- Re: Conservation of Energy, Igor, 15:40
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Igor, 15:32
- MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE, ACE, 15:31
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Ken S. Tucker, 15:24
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 15:13
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Mike, 15:06
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 15:01
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Mike, 14:53
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Mike, 14:52
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Hexenmeister, 14:29
- Conservation of Energy, actionintegral, 14:19
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", tomgee, 14:09
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, PD, 14:07
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 14:04
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, John Ladasky, 13:46
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, honestjohn, 13:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 13:43
- Re: (THE MASS)^3= H.h.h/G/c!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, FrediFizzx, 13:33
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 13:26
- Question concerning Greece and Macedonia, dedanoe, 13:12
- Re: Jesus was preachin the Archimedes' teachin, dedanoe, 13:05
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, jcon, 12:53
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Igor, 12:48
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:45
- Smearing sh_t all over the walls... on top of the graffiti., Jeff…Relf, 12:44
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 12:11
- Re: 67,000 ships moved out of the way for China's Typhoon Chanchu, tj Frazir, 11:12
- Re: questions about electron natural frequency, panteltje, 11:09
- Re: You just love buying boats, don't ya ?, tj Frazir, 10:58
- Re: You just love buying boats, don't ya ?, tj Frazir, 10:45
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 10:11
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, jalegris, 09:49
- "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Moc, 09:34
- Re: questions about electron natural frequency, Randy Poe, 09:26
- (THE MASS)^3= H.h.h/G/c!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS BÖRJESSON, 08:27
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 08:23
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Hexenmeister, 08:16
- Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 08:14
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 08:06
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 07:24
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 07:23
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 07:18
- Apollo moon landing hoax accusations, Schoenfeld, 06:57
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, donstockbauer, 06:16
- Jesus was preachin the Archimedes' teachin, dedanoe, 06:14
- Re: [Help] Physical Explanations On Resonance Needed ?, CSL, 06:13
- Re: questions about electron natural frequency, donstockbauer, 06:10
- Re: Experiment#1, jmfbahciv, 06:10
- Re: Nationwide Physics and Chemistry Sample Test, Hexenmeister, 06:08
- Re: [Help] Physical Explanations On Resonance Needed ?, CSL, 06:07
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, tadchem, 05:51
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 05:11
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 05:03
- Re: question about solid conductors, solid leg wires on detonators?, chemstu, 04:36
- Re: [Help] Physical Explanations On Resonance Needed ?, CWatters, 03:20
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 6: Gumbel Bivariate Exponential, OsherD, 03:08
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, FrediFizzx, 03:02
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 6: Gumbel Bivariate Exponential, OsherD, 02:54
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 02:53
- Re: What is the maximum possible magnetic field allowed in our universe? Answer: 10^42 Gauss ?, FrediFizzx, 02:47
- Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, David Morgan \(MAMS\), 02:46
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 6: Gumbel Bivariate Exponential, OsherD, 02:41
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 02:16
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 02:12
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 02:06
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 6: Gumbel Bivariate Exponential, OsherD, 02:04
- Re: Strong and weak nuclear forces, FrediFizzx, 01:52
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 01:47
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", FrediFizzx, 01:44
- Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 6: Gumbel Bivariate Exponential, OsherD, 01:39
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Edward Hennessey, 01:33
- Re: Questions about the big bang and black holes, Sam Wormley, 01:26
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 01:02
- Questions about the big bang and black holes, Carl Weidling, 00:56
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, William Oertell, 00:55
- Re: [Help] Physical Explanations On Resonance Needed ?, jimp, 00:55
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 00:25
- Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, houlepn, 00:25
- [Help] Physical Explanations On Resonance Needed ?, CSL, 00:17
May 18, 2006
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Ken S. Tucker, 23:57
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 23:46
- What is the maximum possible magnetic field allowed in our universe? Answer: 10^42 Gauss ?, Sam Wormley, 23:42
- Re: Is Physics true?, Robert J. Kolker, 23:38
- Improbable Influence/Causation: Impractical Techniques to Avoid DWI Type Relationships 6: Chuckie Meets Bambie, KOsher Bimborow, 23:36
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 23:29
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 23:18
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, William Oertell, 23:15
- Re: Is Physics true?, Bob Cain, 23:05
- Re: Quarks and gluons, srp, 22:57
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 22:45
- Re: Quarks and gluons, ME, 22:41
- Re: Numismatic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, donstockbauer, 22:15
- Re: questions about electron natural frequency, wate, 22:15
- Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, Ken S. Tucker, 21:52
- The IQ of Black America, Deev, 21:11
- Re: questions about electron natural frequency, Randy Poe, 20:53
- Re: Quarks and gluons, srp, 20:51
- questions about electron natural frequency, wate, 20:09
- Re: Quarks and gluons, FrediFizzx, 20:08
- Re: Quarks and gluons, srp, 19:37
- The Mechanics Friend vintage engineering FA, JaneyP, 19:25
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 19:12
- Re: Is Physics true?, Hexenmeister, 18:56
- Re: Newton's G (new), Henry Haapalainen, 18:08
- Re: Is Physics true?, fraternitydisposal@xxxxxxxxx, 16:53
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 16:36
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Mike, 16:22
- Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, glhansen@xxxxxxx, 16:18
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 16:04
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, PD, 15:54
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 15:46
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 15:38
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Jeff Root, 15:36
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", oriel36, 15:25
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, PD, 15:14
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 15:04
- Re: Is Physics true?, FrediFizzx, 14:56
- Re: Is Physics true?, PD, 14:48
- Re: Is Physics true?, Igor, 14:27
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Igor, 14:22
- Re: Strong and weak nuclear forces, PD, 14:16
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 14:11
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 777 May 18, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 13:58
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, PD, 13:48
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 13:43
- Re: Experiment#1, PD, 13:38
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, rangeravenger, 13:35
- Re: Experiment#1, mmeron, 13:18
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Richard Herring, 13:10
- Re: just talking science, dedanoe, 12:29
- Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, Kevin Doyle, 12:26
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:21
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 12:12
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:07
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 11:53
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 11:27
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Hexenmeister, 11:22
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 10:50
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 10:46
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, rangeravenger, 10:32
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, rangeravenger, 10:31
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral, 10:23
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 10:14
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, J. F. Cornwall, 09:56
- "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Moc, 09:48
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, J. F. Cornwall, 09:46
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 09:42
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 09:40
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 09:39
- Re: LEDs move into the ultraviolet (210 nm), Jan Panteltje, 09:22
- Re: Is Physics true?, FED UP, 09:15
- Re: LEDs move into the ultraviolet (210 nm), Sam Wormley, 08:40
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 08:26
- Re: LEDs move into the ultraviolet (210 nm), Jan Panteltje, 08:01
- Re: LEDs move into the ultraviolet (210 nm), Sam Wormley, 07:56
- Re: Is Physics true?, donstockbauer, 07:27
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Jan Panteltje, 07:20
- Re: "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", oriel36, 07:18
- Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 07:13
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Hexenmeister, 07:02
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 06:46
- Re: Experiment#1, jmfbahciv, 06:35
- Re: LEDs move into the ultraviolet (210 nm), Jan Panteltje, 06:34
- Re: Strong and weak nuclear forces, lugita15, 06:25
- "Testing Einstein in Space: The Gravity Probe B Mission", Sam Wormley, 06:12
- Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, David Morgan \(MAMS\), 05:45
- Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 05:33
- Re: Is Physics true?, Rene Tschaggelar, 05:32
- just talking science, dedanoe, 04:44
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, don findlay, 04:32
- THE PROTON RADIUS 28.5 FERMI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS BÖRJESSON, 03:17
- Re: Is Physics true?, Dirk Van de moortel, 02:58
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 02:54
- Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 5: PI Beats Mainstream For Morgenstern Family, OsherD, 02:51
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Aidan Karley, 02:39
- Re: question about solid conductors, solid leg wires on detonators?, Helmut Wabnig, 02:13
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 02:13
- Is Physics true?, fraternitydisposal@xxxxxxxxx, 01:40
- Quarks and gluons, ME, 01:16
- question about solid conductors, solid leg wires on detonators?, chemstu, 01:01
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 00:37
May 17, 2006
- Re: Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, dda1, 23:44
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, J. F. Cornwall, 23:08
- Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, jimp, 22:55
- Pioneer 10 Anomaly solved with expanding wavelength, jpolasek, 22:53
- Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 4: Uniform Bivariate Distribution Families, OsherD, 22:31
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 22:10
- Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, CSL, 22:04
- New Lift Technology, atxinter, 21:50
- New Lift Technology, atxinter, 21:49
- Re: Nationwide Physics and Chemistry Sample Test, Uncle Al, 21:47
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 21:21
- Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 20:53
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 20:45
- Re: Strong and weak nuclear forces, Rock Brentwood, 20:35
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", donstockbauer, 20:35
- Strong and weak nuclear forces, lugita15, 20:04
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 3: Bivariate Families of Distirbutions, OsherD, 19:55
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 3: Bivariate Families of Distirbutions, OsherD, 19:51
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 3: Bivariate Families of Distirbutions, OsherD, 19:48
- Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 3: Bivariate Families of Distirbutions, OsherD, 19:35
- To Einstein, the word God meant the cosmos, as revealed by science., Jeff…Relf, 19:24
- Quantum gases in 3D, Sam Wormley, 18:55
- LEDs move into the ultraviolet (210 nm), Sam Wormley, 18:48
- Re: New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved, PD, 18:43
- Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, Ken S. Tucker, 18:21
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 17:44
- Re: Newton's G (new), Henry Haapalainen, 17:24
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 17:24
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Jan Panteltje, 17:20
- Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, Timo A. Nieminen, 17:08
- Re: conceptual physics, Hexenmeister, 17:05
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Hexenmeister, 17:04
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jim Lillie, 17:01
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 16:40
- Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 16:14
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Hexenmeister, 16:13
- Nationwide Physics and Chemistry Sample Test, Chad J, 16:10
- Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 15:27
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Edward Hennessey, 15:23
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 1, OsherD, 15:16
- Re: conceptual physics, PD, 15:06
- Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 15:02
- the naci cross and dynamics of lever, dedanoe, 14:47
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, Jo Schaper, 14:44
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Jan Panteltje, 14:35
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Hexenmeister, 14:33
- Re: HITLER GOVERNMENT RELEASES NEW FOOTAGE OF REICHSTAG FIRE, puppet_sock, 14:27
- m vs. h*nu in T_{mu,nu}, John Schutkeker, 14:27
- Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, jimp, 14:25
- conceptual physics, Gunnar G, 14:20
- Re: Newton's G (new), John C . Polasek, 14:09
- Re: HITLER GOVERNMENT RELEASES NEW FOOTAGE OF REICHSTAG FIRE, FatKat, 13:47
- Re: How are metals classified as Hole or Electron conductors?, Henning Makholm, 13:35
- Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, Henning Makholm, 13:24
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Jan Panteltje, 12:54
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 12:51
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:23
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:16
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 1, Johnny Abdulia, 12:09
- Re: HITLER GOVERNMENT RELEASES NEW FOOTAGE OF REICHSTAG FIRE, Dan, 12:09
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Hexenmeister, 12:02
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 11:56
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, SBC Yahoo, 11:54
- Re: Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 11:44
- Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, mmeron, 11:04
- Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, Greg Hansen, 10:39
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Sam Wormley, 10:12
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:05
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 09:43
- "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Moc, 08:48
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 08:39
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Jan Panteltje, 08:33
- Re: Triboelectric amplifiers, Andy Resnick, 08:22
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 08:19
- Re: Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Hexenmeister, 08:04
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, oriel36, 07:56
- Triboelectric amplifiers, Ian Macmillan, 07:23
- Impressive New Tricks of Light, Lu, 07:23
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 07:21
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 07:14
- Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 07:13
- HITLER GOVERNMENT RELEASES NEW FOOTAGE OF REICHSTAG FIRE, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 07:09
- Re: FrediFakir and the mysterious "We"., Androfizzx, 06:44
- Optics: need help understanding lens flare/smear effect, Gert, 06:32
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 03:42
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, Roy L . Fuchs, 02:56
- Scablands of Washington state on NOVA tv show; pothole formation, a_plutonium, 02:01
- Cellular ether theory (large TeX), Ilja Schmelzer, 01:41
- Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, jimp, 01:35
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 01:17
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 00:29
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, operator jay, 00:25
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 00:16
May 16, 2006
- Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, CSL, 23:53
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 23:30
- You just love buying boats, don't ya ?, Jeff…Relf, 22:36
- T.J., I'm not so sure about your 71 cents number, or the cash at their dock., Jeff…Relf, 22:20
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 22:03
- Re: I've now made 138000 ton ship for 10 mil, tj Frazir, 21:54
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Llanzlan Klazmon, 21:31
- Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, Kevin Doyle, 21:28
- Re: I've now made over 20 offers to buy !, tj Frazir, 21:18
- Re: How are metals classified as Hole or Electron conductors?, jimp, 21:15
- Re: Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, jimp, 21:15
- Re: Bogoslovs Aluminium., tj Frazir, 20:39
- How are metals classified as Hole or Electron conductors?, JAH, 20:28
- Re: I've now made over 20 offers to buy !, tj Frazir, 20:20
- Gravity profile in 1D motion kinematic problem, Kevin, 20:07
- I've now made over 20 offers to buy !, Jeff…Relf, 19:46
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 19:07
- Re: curses, The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
- Re: curses, The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 17:33
- Re: www.Genisim.QC.CA/aluminum/e_europe.htm., tj Frazir, 17:17
- Re: www.Genisim.QC.CA/aluminum/e_europe.htm., tj Frazir, 17:12
- Re: Bogoslovs Aluminium., tj Frazir, 17:08
- Re: Bogoslovs Aluminium., tj Frazir, 17:04
- Re: Mr. Stanislav N in Vladivostok., tj Frazir, 17:03
- Re: Mr. Stanislav N in Vladivostok., tj Frazir, 17:02
- Re: I'll work on finding the actual producers., tj Frazir, 17:01
- Re: Define Temperature, tadchem, 16:44
- www.Genisim.QC.CA/aluminum/e_europe.htm., Jeff…Relf, 16:19
- Re: HI, all, a simple question on the expectation value of angular momentum in NMR, Johnny, 16:18
- Bogoslovs Aluminium., Jeff…Relf, 16:11
- Re: Finding the producers in Russia and Venezuela., tj Frazir, 16:10
- Bogoslovs Aluminium., Jeff…Relf, 16:06
- Re: Finding the producers in Russia and Venezuela., tj Frazir, 15:58
- Re: Finding the producers in Russia and Venezuela., tj Frazir, 15:53
- Mr. Stanislav N in Vladivostok., Jeff…Relf, 15:50
- Re: HI, all, a simple question on the expectation value of angular momentum in NMR, Bob Cain, 15:46
- Re: Looking for plants in Venezuela and Russia., tj Frazir, 15:39
- Re: super-luminous motion, Paul Cardinale, 15:33
- Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 15:25
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Andy Resnick, 15:24
- Re: Experiment#1, OG, 14:44
- Re: Newton's G (new), Sue..., 14:30
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 14:20
- Re: Experiment#1, Henning Makholm, 14:10
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 14:10
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 14:03
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 13:50
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 13:48
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 13:43
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 13:28
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 13:24
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 13:23
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 13:19
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 13:16
- Re: Experiment#1, mmeron, 13:13
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 13:10
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 13:04
- I'll work on finding the actual producers., Jeff…Relf, 13:03
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 12:53
- Finding the producers in Russia and Venezuela., Jeff…Relf, 12:44
- Re: HI, all, a simple question on the expectation value of angular momentum in NMR, Hexenmeister, 12:37
- Looking for plants in Venezuela and Russia., Jeff…Relf, 12:36
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:32
- Re: They want a deposit up front., tj Frazir, 12:26
- Re: T.J., after you edit this email, I'll send it out., tj Frazir, 12:17
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 12:00
- HI, all, a simple question on the expectation value of angular momentum in NMR, sjsongjing, 11:58
- T.J., after you edit this email, I'll send it out., Jeff…Relf, 11:53
- Re: Hinton has only 1 thousand MT and wants a 10 percent deposit., tj Frazir, 11:47
- Re: ShipExpo.COM even shows the rust !, tj Frazir, 11:29
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 11:26
- Re: Hinton has only 1 thousand MT and wants a 10 percent deposit., tj Frazir, 11:23
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Richard Herring, 11:06
- Re: Hinton has only 1 thousand MT and wants a 10 percent deposit., tj Frazir, 10:30
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, Grant W. Petty, 10:24
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 10:14
- Re: super-luminous motion, Sam Wormley, 10:09
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 10:01
- Re: Hinton has only 1 thousand MT and wants a 10 percent deposit., jimp, 09:55
- Re: Properety of photon, actionintegral, 09:35
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 09:25
- Re: They want a deposit up front., jimp, 09:25
- Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 09:15
- Re: Hinton has only 1 thousand MT and wants a 10 percent deposit., Dr. Planckenstein, 09:13
- "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Moc, 09:11
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 09:10
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, guskz, 08:46
- Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 08:39
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, guskz, 08:38
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, amdx, 08:37
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, guskz, 08:29
- ShipExpo.COM even shows the rust !, Jeff…Relf, 08:27
- String question, p4o2, 08:12
- Raman are 10 cents each and my food stamps pay for it., Jeff…Relf, 08:07
- Re: They want a deposit up front., Randy Poe, 08:06
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 08:03
- They want a deposit up front., Jeff…Relf, 07:54
- Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 07:51
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 07:45
- Hinton has only 1 thousand MT and wants a 10 percent deposit., Jeff…Relf, 07:22
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 07:05
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 06:41
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 06:20
- Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 06:14
- Re: Properety of photon, rAgAv, 06:00
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 05:52
- Re: super-luminous motion, Hexenmeister, 05:47
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, Rheilly Phoull, 05:19
- super-luminous motion, Jack, 05:07
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Richard Herring, 05:06
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 04:58
- Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, dp, 03:54
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 2: PI Max Entropy Better Than Shannon Max Entropy, OsherD, 02:50
- Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 2: PI Max Entropy Better Than Shannon Max Entropy, OsherD, 02:34
- Re: Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, mmeron, 02:04
- Re: I couldn't be a sailor., tj Frazir, 02:02
- Re: I couldn't be a sailor., tj Frazir, 01:57
- Re: I couldn't be a sailor., tj Frazir, 01:42
- Re: I couldn't be a sailor., tj Frazir, 01:31
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 01:25
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, Grant W. Petty, 01:04
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 01:04
- Re: I couldn't be a sailor., tj Frazir, 01:03
- Re: I couldn't be a sailor., tj Frazir, 01:00
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 00:50
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 00:28
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, Grant W. Petty, 00:19
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, Grant W. Petty, 00:11
May 15, 2006
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 23:52
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 23:46
- Intro to Gamma Spectroscopy, Greg Hansen, 23:12
- I couldn't be a sailor., Jeff…Relf, 23:02
- Re: Define Temperature, mmeron, 22:57
- Re: Why the frog is green?, pete, 22:08
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 1, OsherD, 22:08
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 1, OsherD, 22:02
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 21:54
- Re: Force of my car crash?, pete, 21:53
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 1, OsherD, 21:46
- Re: Define Temperature, pete, 21:42
- Probable Influence/Causation: Practical Calculations and Relationships 1, OsherD, 21:33
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 42: Causation By or To a Constant and Special Relativity, OsherD, 21:10
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, tadchem, 21:01
- Re: A ton of deisel in America costs USD 1.24 a gallon., tj Frazir, 20:56
- Re: A ton of deisel in America costs USD 1.24 a gallon., tj Frazir, 20:42
- Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 20:31
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 20:26
- Re: Newton's G (new), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:24
- A ton of deisel in America costs USD 1.24 a gallon., Jeff…Relf, 20:23
- Re: Deisel costs 89 cents a gallon ?, tj Frazir, 20:03
- I'd have to find the yards in Russia., Jeff…Relf, 20:02
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Schoenfeld, 19:48
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 19:46
- Mike_Mironenko's Parma-Limited.COM in Tatarstan, Russia., Jeff…Relf, 19:28
- Re: A big boat 5000 ton for jeff, tj Frazir, 19:27
- Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or. - The movie version, SCW, 19:21
- Deisel costs 89 cents a gallon ?, Jeff…Relf, 19:14
- Re: A big if., tj Frazir, 19:10
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, Mark Walter, 19:03
- Re: Deisel costs 89 cents a gallon ?, tj Frazir, 19:00
- Re: I don't know T.J.'s face, name or phone number., tj Frazir, 18:59
- Re: I don't know T.J.'s face, name or phone number., tj Frazir, 18:55
- HELP SMITHSONIAN CHOOSE ITS NEW LOGO -- Based on Its Scientific Integrity --, Ed Conrad, 18:49
- Alt. Wit.Jeff-Relf, Jeff…Relf, 18:41
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, Grant W. Petty, 18:35
- Re: Why the frog is green?, tadchem, 18:35
- Re: Srivaths is a middle man, just like T.J. and me... he's our _Co..., tj Frazir, 18:33
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, Johnny, 18:32
- Re: moderately resistive materials?, tadchem, 18:31
- Re: T.J. is an über optimistic/enthusiastic hound dog., tj Frazir, 18:28
- Re: T.J. is an über optimistic/enthusiastic hound dog., tj Frazir, 18:27
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 42: Causation By or To a Constant and Special Relativity, Amhabla Zed, 18:19
- A big if., Jeff…Relf, 18:18
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 18:17
- Get a _Real_ job, idiot., Jeff…Relf, 17:55
- moderately resistive materials?, Grant W. Petty, 17:15
- I don't know T.J.'s face, name or phone number., Jeff…Relf, 17:14
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Sam Wormley, 17:00
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Igor, 16:55
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 16:51
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Sam Wormley, 16:39
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Igor, 16:34
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Igor, 16:24
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 42: Causation By or To a Constant and Special Relativity, OsherD, 16:07
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Sam Wormley, 16:01
- Re: Newton's G (new), oriel36, 15:16
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), FrediFizzx, 14:30
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Igor, 14:02
- Re: Exotic matter and gravitational dipoles, Igor, 13:53
- Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope, top9, 13:50
- Re: Hinton's 2 thousand MT of copper ingots at USD 3,920 per MT., Jeff…Relf, 13:37
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 13:33
- Re: notice the difference between them two?, Igor, 13:25
- Re: BUSH TO DISCUSS ALIENS -- To Finally Admit Extraterrestrials Have Visited Earth -- To Read Henoch Prophesies -- Billy Meier -- UFOs, ElRon XChile, 13:06
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), Hexenmeister, 12:29
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 12:25
- Did T.J. dream it ?, Jeff…Relf, 12:18
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 12:13
- Srivaths is a middle man, just like T.J. and me... he's our _Competitor_ !, Jeff…Relf, 12:06
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), Dirk Van de moortel, 12:04
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 12:01
- Re: Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or. - The movie version, Randy Poe, 12:00
- Re: Numismatic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:50
- Dork Van de merde claims xor implies or. - The movie version, donstockbauer, 11:48
- Re: Newton's G (new), Ken S. Tucker, 11:35
- T.J. is an über optimistic/enthusiastic hound dog., Jeff…Relf, 11:35
- High Energy Physics Computing, dalimoh@xxxxxxxxx, 11:32
- Re: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 11:16
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Hexenmeister, 11:04
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 11:02
- Re: Properety of photon, Ed Hanna, 10:56
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 10:56
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 10:56
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 10:51
- Sagar Chowrasia of Manaksia Limited, in Kolkata, INDIA, Jeff…Relf, 10:47
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 10:46
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 10:44
- Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 10:33
- Newton III in leverian hydraulics, dedanoe, 10:19
- Re: notice the difference between them two?, dedanoe, 10:12
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 10:10
- molecular orbital- cubic packing- more pictures and speculation, ma1ibu, 10:09
- Re: What is a ptl??, Richard Herring, 10:06
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), glhansen@xxxxxxx, 09:55
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 09:47
- Re: BUSH TO DISCUSS ALIENS -- To Finally Admit Extraterrestrials Have Visited Earth -- To Read Henoch Prophesies -- Billy Meier -- UFOs, Magus, 09:41
- Re: What The US Military Does Best: F*ck, Take Drugs and Blow Thin..., tj Frazir, 09:37
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:29
- Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, tj Frazir, 09:28
- Re: Newton's G (new), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:23
- Re: NSA spying on all americans, tj Frazir, 09:20
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:19
- "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Moc, 09:15
- Re: NSA spying on all americans, tj Frazir, 09:11
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Richard Herring, 09:04
- BUSH TO DISCUSS ALIENS -- To Finally Admit Extraterrestrials Have Visited Earth -- To Read Henoch Prophesies -- Billy Meier -- UFOs, Ed Conrad, 08:59
- Re: We'll have to wait for Anne's quote and licensing... it'll take..., tj Frazir, 08:54
- Re: Sunlight Glass Atomic Filter, tj Frazir, 08:50
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 08:00
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 07:47
- Re: notice the difference between them two?, Randy Poe, 07:37
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), Hexenmeister, 07:32
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 07:09
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 07:00
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 07:00
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 06:09
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 06:07
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 05:50
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 05:50
- Re: notice the difference between them two?, dedanoe, 05:50
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, tadchem, 05:47
- Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 05:45
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 15, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:42
- Re: What is a ptl??, tadchem, 05:30
- Re: Why the frog is green?, jmfbahciv, 05:28
- Re: Newton's G (new), Sue..., 05:06
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Richard Herring, 04:52
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 41: Models Where Time Generates Space, OsherD, 03:58
- Re: Isotope electronic effects, Angelo, 03:52
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 41: Models Where Time Generates Space, OsherD, 03:45
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 03:30
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 41: Models Where Time Generates Space, OsherD, 03:29
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 03:13
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 03:12
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), OsherD, 02:50
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 02:37
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 02:05
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Sam Wormley, 01:51
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Shreyas, 01:44
- Re: Lecture of the Week: Part III: Is Evolution Sufficient?, gb6724, 01:43
- Re: Isotope electronic effects, Angelo, 01:05
- Re: Exotic matter and gravitational dipoles, Sam Wormley, 00:48
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 00:17
May 14, 2006
- Exotic matter and gravitational dipoles, mike3, 22:53
- Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Sam Wormley, 22:01
- Lecture of the Week: Part III: Is Evolution Sufficient?, Wirt Atmar, 21:36
- Re: Salt water evaporation, Edward Green, 21:20
- Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx, 21:14
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Edward Green, 21:13
- Re: A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), Edward Green, 21:08
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 20:45
- A continued question about GR (mainly for Greg Hansen), lugita15, 20:43
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 20:18
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 19:45
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 19:35
- Re: Properety of photon, mmeron, 19:31
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 19:29
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 19:20
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 19:04
- Re: T.J., You found 60 thousand tons ? Where ?, tj Frazir, 18:50
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 18:30
- Re: T.J., You found 60 thousand tons ? Where ?, tj Frazir, 18:23
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), Hexenmeister, 18:21
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 18:18
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 18:14
- Re: Hinton's 2 thousand MT of copper ingots at USD 3,920 per MT., tj Frazir, 18:10
- Re: Newton's G (new), Henry Haapalainen, 18:03
- Re: Properety of photon, john, 17:58
- Re: Experiment#1, mmeron, 17:54
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 17:53
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 17:51
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 17:49
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 17:37
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 17:33
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 17:33
- Re: "Quantum Logic and Probability Theory (Stanford) Critiqued, OsherD, 17:18
- Re: Newton's G (new), Ken S. Tucker, 17:10
- Re: Experiment#1, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:39
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, timo, 16:36
- Re: "Quantum Logic and Probability Theory (Stanford) Critiqued, OsherD, 16:31
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 16:30
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 16:21
- "Quantum Logic and Probability Theory (Stanford) Critiqued, OsherD, 16:19
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 40: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, Quantum_Ranger, 15:49
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), OsherD, 15:46
- Re: symmetrical sun rays under a cloud - why?, info, 15:41
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), OsherD, 15:35
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., Jeff…Relf, 15:34
- Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 11: P(A U B), OsherD, 15:21
- Re: Experiment#1, mmeron, 15:20
- Re: Experiment#1, mmeron, 15:16
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 40: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, OsherD, 14:51
- Re: symmetrical sun rays under a cloud - why?, OG, 14:42
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 14:34
- T.J., You found 60 thousand tons ? Where ?, Jeff…Relf, 14:33
- Re: Question about General Relativity, actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx, 14:27
- Re: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, OsherD, 14:18
- Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, T Wake, 14:16
- Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, T Wake, 14:15
- Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, T Wake, 14:14
- Goldfrappe, Rhapsody.COM/goldfrapp, Jeff…Relf, 14:12
- Re: Salt water evaporation, Eddie Cantor, 14:09
- Hinton's 2 thousand MT of copper ingots at USD 3,920 per MT., Jeff…Relf, 14:04
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 14:02
- Re: symmetrical sun rays under a cloud - why?, Martin Hogbin, 13:59
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 13:57
- Re: Properety of photon, actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx, 13:55
- Re: notice the difference between them two?, Igor, 13:54
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 13:44
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:44
- T.J., I thought you wanted me to ask, just in case., Jeff…Relf, 13:44
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 13:42
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 13:40
- Mironenko only offered to sell a tenth of a metric tonne., Jeff…Relf, 13:39
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 13:38
- Re: symmetrical sun rays under a cloud - why?, Sam Wormley, 13:38
- Re: Properety of photon, Sam Wormley, 13:37
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Sam Wormley, 13:36
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Jan Panteltje, 13:35
- Re: LEDs, Jan Panteltje, 13:34
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:34
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:31
- Re: Soft, Clear, Pessimistic Vocals., Bifidus Regularus, 13:29
- Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, tj Frazir, 13:23
- Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, tj Frazir, 13:21
- My proposed reply to Charles Hinton., Jeff…Relf, 13:20
- Re: How to calculate Vacuum Energy Density (120 magnitude), FrediFizzx, 13:20
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 13:18
- Re: T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, tj Frazir, 13:15
- Re: Mike Mironenko of Parma Limited Co., Ltd, Parma-Limited.COM, Ru..., tj Frazir, 13:09
- We'll have to wait for Anne's quote and licensing... it'll take time., Jeff…Relf, 13:08
- Re: Mike Mironenko of Parma Limited Co., Ltd, Parma-Limited.COM, Ru..., tj Frazir, 13:04
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Hexenmeister, 13:03
- T.J., I've almost reached the 20 sellers number !, Jeff…Relf, 13:01
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, T Wake, 12:53
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, T Wake, 12:52
- Re: Drawing fire from all sides., T Wake, 12:47
- Re: What is a ptl??, greysky, 12:47
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 12:42
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 12:40
- Re: Anne is an aluminum supplier, not a shipper., tj Frazir, 12:36
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 12:35
- Re: Anne is an aluminum supplier, not a shipper., tj Frazir, 12:29
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 12:28
- Re: Anne is an aluminum supplier, not a shipper., tj Frazir, 12:25
- Mike Mironenko of Parma Limited Co., Ltd, Parma-Limited.COM, Russia., Jeff…Relf, 12:21
- Re: Anne is an aluminum supplier, not a shipper., tj Frazir, 12:18
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 11:59
- Re: Drawing fire from all sides., tj Frazir, 11:57
- Anne is an aluminum supplier, not a shipper., Jeff…Relf, 11:57
- Re: LEDs, jimp, 11:45
- Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 11:45
- Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 11:45
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 11:38
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 11:37
- Re: Newton's G (new), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 11:35
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 11:34
- Re: Experiment#1, Greg Neill, 11:33
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 11:28
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 11:21
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, T Wake, 11:16
- Re: Properety of photon, T Wake, 11:13
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 11:10
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 11:08
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 11:07
- Re: Why the frog is green?, jimp, 11:05
- Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 11:05
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 11:00
- Re: Soft, Clear, Pessimistic Vocals., Rick, 10:56
- Re: Why the frog is green?, Greg Neill, 10:56
- Re: Properety of photon, rAgAv, 10:56
- Re: LEDs, Greg Neill, 10:54
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 10:53
- Re: Properety of photon, john, 10:49
- Re: Why the frog is green?, john, 10:48
- Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 10:45
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 10:43
- Re: Experiment#1, Greg Neill, 10:41
- Why the frog is green?, amphibius . morales, 10:40
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, T Wake, 10:40
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 10:39
- Re: Soft, Clear, Pessimistic Vocals., T Wake, 10:38
- Soft, Clear, Pessimistic Vocals., Jeff…Relf, 10:36
- Re: LEDs, jimp, 10:35
- Re: sucked out of airplanes, jimp, 10:35
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 10:34
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 10:30
- Properety of photon, rAgAv, 10:29
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., jimp, 10:25
- Re: Dark Energy caused by Cosmological Constant or Quintessence??, John C . Polasek, 10:15
- symmetrical sun rays under a cloud - why?, info, 10:15
- Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 10:15
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 10:09
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 10:07
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 10:07
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 10:02
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 09:59
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 09:52
- Re: LEDs, john, 09:38
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 09:38
- Re: LEDs, Jan Panteltje, 09:38
- "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Eht, 09:35
- "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Eht, 09:34
- Re: curses, T Wake, 09:23
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 09:13
- Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:13
- LEDs, bob, 09:11
- Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 10: Solvutions For Weights of (1 + y - x), y/x, and z, OsherD, 08:58
- Re: questions for the bored., jmfbahciv, 08:42
- notice the difference between them two?, dedanoe, 07:37
- The great mr. E - the time, dedanoe, 07:26
- Re: sucked out of airplanes, Jan Panteltje, 07:22
- Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 07:06
- Re: Posters on Google..sci-physics, donstockbauer, 06:46
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Bilge, 06:02
- Re: Isotope electronic effects, mmeron, 05:52
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 05:38
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 05:31
- Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less, T Wake, 05:15
- sucked out of airplanes, bob, 05:09
- Re: Drawing fire from all sides., T Wake, 05:07
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 05:04
- Re: It didn't say if the price was in dollars or pounds sterling., T Wake, 05:03
- Re: Experiment#1, OG, 05:03
- Re: Isotope electronic effects, Angelo, 05:01
- Re: How to calculate Vacuum Energy Density (120 magnitude), Tarop, 04:18
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 03:25
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 9: f(x, y, z), OsherD, 02:51
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 9: f(x, y, z), OsherD, 02:38
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 40: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, Quantum_Ranger, 02:36
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 02:30
- Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 9: f(x, y, z), OsherD, 02:26
- Posters on Google..sci-physics, Quantum_Ranger, 02:24
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 02:19
- Re: Shrinking universe, Quantum_Ranger, 02:07
- Re: Experiment#1, mmeron, 01:56
- Re: Newton's G (new), Ken S. Tucker, 01:33
- T.J. speaks the language of international trade., Jeff…Relf, 01:20
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 00:45
- I'll have lots of moochers hanging around., Jeff…Relf, 00:43
- Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 00:35
- Re: Why the more accelerated twin aged less, tj Frazir, 00:34
- Re: Drawing fire from all sides., tj Frazir, 00:21
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 00:21
- Numismatic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS BÖRJESSON, 00:00
May 13, 2006
- Drawing fire from all sides., Jeff…Relf, 23:47
- Coerrection - Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 23:45
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 23:24
- Monday it is then. I'll learn by doing., Jeff…Relf, 23:15
- Re: Dark Energy caused by Cosmological Constant or Quintessence??, Quantum_Ranger, 23:14
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 23:08
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 23:07
- Re: Dark Energy caused by Cosmological Constant or Quintessence??, Sam Wormley, 22:50
- Alaska's tall mountains, watching over the inside passage., Jeff…Relf, 22:47
- Re: Dark Energy caused by Cosmological Constant or Quintessence??, Tarop, 22:17
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 21:44
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 21:37
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 21:34
- Re: Dark Energy caused by Cosmological Constant or Quintessence??, Sam Wormley, 21:31
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 21:21
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 21:17
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 20:58
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx, 20:52
- Re: It didn't say if the price was in dollars or pounds sterling., tj Frazir, 20:46
- Re: How to calculate Vacuum Energy Density (120 magnitude), FrediFizzx, 20:39
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 20:31
- Re: Shrinking universe, Protoman, 20:30
- Dark Energy caused by Cosmological Constant or Quintessence??, Tarop, 20:28
- Re: What is a ptl??, Tarop, 20:20
- Re: What is a ptl??, FrediFizzx, 20:10
- Re: Shrinking universe, Sam Wormley, 20:09
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., jimp, 20:05
- Re: Experiment#1, OG, 19:54
- Re: Isotope electronic effects, Salmon Egg, 19:53
- Re: Coin animation explained, ma1ibu, 19:53
- How to calculate Vacuum Energy Density (120 magnitude), Tarop, 19:53
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 8: Median's Role, OsherD, 19:52
- Re: Understanding the Action Integral, Sam Wormley, 19:41
- Shrinking universe, Protoman, 19:38
- Re: Echo, Hexenmeister, 19:38
- Re: What is a ptl??, tadchem, 18:42
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Henry Spencer, 18:41
- Re: Isotope electronic effects, tadchem, 18:35
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, tadchem, 18:27
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, tadchem, 18:27
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 18:23
- Re: Coin animation explained, Hexenmeister, 18:23
- Re: Coin animation explained, ma1ibu, 18:14
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 18:12
- Understanding the Action Integral, actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx, 17:58
- Re: Echo, Henning Makholm, 17:55
- Re: Coin animation explained, ma1ibu, 17:47
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 17:46
- Re: It didn't say if the price was in dollars or pounds sterling., T Wake, 17:42
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 17:34
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 17:34
- It didn't say if the price was in dollars or pounds sterling., Jeff…Relf, 17:31
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 17:26
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., jimp, 17:25
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 17:22
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 17:19
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 17:14
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, FrediFizzx, 17:08
- Re: Define Temperature, mmeron, 17:04
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 17:00
- Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 8: Median's Role, OsherD, 16:53
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 16:51
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 16:41
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 40: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, OsherD, 16:35
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Henry Spencer, 16:28
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 40: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, OsherD, 16:27
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 16:23
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 16:20
- Re: Isotope electronic effects, mmeron, 16:14
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 40: Time As the Only Physical Geometric Dimension, OsherD, 16:12
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 16:12
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 16:06
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 16:03
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 15:44
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 15:33
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Bill Owen, 15:32
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 15:28
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 15:21
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 15:12
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., tj Frazir, 15:10
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 15:01
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 14:59
- Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 14:57
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 14:55
- Re: My wording., tj Frazir, 14:49
- Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 14:47
- Re: Is Anne with EasTrans_Lines, www.EasTrans.COM.SG/Services.asp ?, tj Frazir, 14:47
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., jimp, 14:45
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 14:38
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 14:31
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 14:27
- Re: Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., T Wake, 14:19
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 14:03
- Put down the coffee, your schizophrenia is showing again., Jeff…Relf, 13:59
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Edward Green, 13:59
- Re: Psychology is a softer science than Newtonian physics., T Wake, 13:57
- Re: T.J. has something to say... T_Wake doesn't., T Wake, 13:55
- Re: Psychology is a softer science than Newtonian physics., Jeff…Relf, 13:53
- Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 13:53
- Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 6: Truncated Real Laurent Series and Medians, OsherD, 13:53
- Re: T.J. has something to say... T_Wake doesn't., Jeff…Relf, 13:48
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 13:47
- Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 13:37
- Re: T.J. has something to say... T_Wake doesn't., T Wake, 13:30
- Re: Psychology is a softer science than Newtonian physics., T Wake, 13:27
- Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 13:23
- Re: Are you _Forced_ to read only crap ?, T Wake, 13:23
- T.J. has something to say... T_Wake doesn't., Jeff…Relf, 13:16
- Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, realist, 13:16
- Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 13:07
- Re: What is a ptl??, Martin Hogbin, 13:02
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 13:00
- Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 12:56
- Are you _Forced_ to read only crap ?, Jeff…Relf, 12:52
- Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 12:49
- Psychology is a softer science than Newtonian physics., Jeff…Relf, 12:47
- Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 12:39
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, T Wake, 12:37
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Sam Wormley, 12:36
- Re: Finding Anne's sellers., T Wake, 12:36
- Re: The bankers meeting in Beijing., T Wake, 12:35
- Re: Salt water evaporation, jimp, 12:25
- Re: Finding Anne's sellers., jimp, 12:25
- Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 12:19
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 12:18
- Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 12:08
- The bankers meeting in Beijing., Jeff…Relf, 11:48
- Re: Define Temperature, srp, 11:47
- Re: Quantum Computers, rick_sobie, 11:46
- GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE, ACE, 11:39
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 11:32
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 11:32
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 11:21
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 11:15
- Re: Salt water evaporation, Edward Green, 11:12
- Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 5: Super-Super-Force f(x, 0), OsherD, 11:10
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 11:04
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 4: Super-Force Diagonal x = y, OsherD, 10:54
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 10:51
- Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, CWatters, 10:40
- Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 4: Super-Force Diagonal x = y, OsherD, 10:24
- Re: My wording., T Wake, 10:21
- Re: What is a ptl??, petersamir10, 10:19
- My wording., Jeff…Relf, 10:14
- Re: Define Temperature, tadchem, 09:41
- Is Anne with EasTrans_Lines, www.EasTrans.COM.SG/Services.asp ?, Jeff…Relf, 09:32
- "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Eht, 09:25
- "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Eht, 09:24
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 09:13
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 09:07
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, John Zinni, 09:01
- Re: curses, T Wake, 09:00
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 08:58
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, tadchem, 08:53
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Dr. Planckenstein, 08:51
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 08:43
- Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, tadchem, 08:41
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 08:38
- Re: Define Temperature, hetware, 08:27
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 08:12
- Re: Coin animation explained, ma1ibu, 08:11
- Echo, Gunnar G, 08:11
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 07:42
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 07:42
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 07:42
- Salt water evaporation, Eddie Cantor, 07:37
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, srp, 07:34
- Isotope electronic effects, Angelo, 07:17
- Re: Quantum Computers, donstockbauer, 06:38
- Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, hetware, 06:01
- Re: EINSTEIN'S NEW THEORY OF INFORMATION, Jim Black, 05:57
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 05:29
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 May 06 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje, 05:20
- Re: What is a ptl??, Martin Hogbin, 04:50
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 04:49
- Re: Any good links for cosmology (Web or newsgroups), Dirk Van de moortel, 04:15
- Re: Coin animation explained, Hexenmeister, 04:02
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 03:41
- Re: Quantum Computers, Yawmon, 03:41
- Quantum Computers, Rick Sobie, 03:24
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 03:22
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 3: Phase-Changing Constants, OsherD, 03:18
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, T Wake, 03:16
- Re: Finding Anne's sellers., T Wake, 03:15
- Re: Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, T Wake, 03:11
- Re: The outcome is assured., T Wake, 03:09
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 02:59
- What is a ptl??, Dennis, 02:53
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 3: Phase-Changing Constants, OsherD, 02:44
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 02:41
- Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 3: Phase-Changing Constants, OsherD, 02:14
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, franklinhu, 01:52
- Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 2: Typo Correction, OsherD, 01:50
- Any good links for cosmology (Web or newsgroups), Jacky Luk, 01:25
- Re: Define Temperature, srp, 01:14
- Re: concentration sensor uing UV light, tj Frazir, 01:08
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 01:05
- Re: dedanoe goes supersonic, Immortalist, 01:04
- Re: New look for "Newton's bucket", tj Frazir, 00:58
- Define Temperature, hetware, 00:50
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Dr. Planckenstein, 00:43
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 00:34
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 00:25
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 00:25
- Re: The outcome is assured., tj Frazir, 00:14
May 12, 2006
- Re: Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, tj Frazir, 23:55
- Re: Finding Anne's sellers., tj Frazir, 23:42
- Re: 35 K MT in China ?, tj Frazir, 23:37
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Steve Willner, 23:36
- Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 23:32
- Re: FOB price for 60 thousand metric tonnes of aluminum ingots ?, tj Frazir, 23:32
- New look for "Newton's bucket", Sam Wormley, 23:29
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 23:22
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Dr. Planckenstein, 23:17
- Finding Anne's sellers., Jeff…Relf, 23:13
- 35 K MT in China ?, Jeff…Relf, 23:04
- Re: FOB price for 60 thousand metric tonnes of aluminum ingots ?, Jeff…Relf, 23:01
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, Bruce E. Stemplewski, 22:53
- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 12 May 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 22:52
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, namlohip, 22:47
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 22:45
- Re: concentration sensor uing UV light, john, 22:43
- Re: Uncle Al, john, 22:38
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 22:30
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, tj Frazir, 22:26
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 22:20
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, tj Frazir, 22:18
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, Rick, 22:14
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 22:14
- Re: The outcome is assured., T Wake, 22:11
- Re: Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, T Wake, 22:10
- Re: Anne wants to be paid before the shipping date., tj Frazir, 22:10
- Re: T.J. is Russian, Native_Alaskan, Candian and American... all at once., T Wake, 22:04
- Re: FOB price for 60 thousand metric tonnes of aluminum ingots ?, tj Frazir, 22:02
- Re: FOB price for 60 thousand metric tonnes of aluminum ingots ?, tj Frazir, 21:58
- FOB price for 60 thousand metric tonnes of aluminum ingots ?, Jeff…Relf, 21:54
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Know edge, 21:51
- Re: T.J. is Russian, Native_Alaskan, Candian and American... all at..., tj Frazir, 21:13
- Re: T.J. is Russian, Native_Alaskan, Candian and American... all at..., tj Frazir, 20:58
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Dr. Planckenstein, 20:56
- Re: T.J. is Russian, Native_Alaskan, Candian and American... all at..., tj Frazir, 20:56
- Anne wants to be paid before the shipping date., Jeff…Relf, 20:50
- Re: Newton's G (new), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:50
- T.J. is Russian, Native_Alaskan, Candian and American... all at once., Jeff…Relf, 20:35
- Re: Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, tj Frazir, 20:32
- Re: Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, tj Frazir, 20:24
- The outcome is assured., Jeff…Relf, 20:05
- Re: T.J., Won't I need to contact you _Immediately_ after I get the quote ?, T Wake, 19:35
- Re: Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, T Wake, 19:35
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, Hexenmeister, 19:29
- Muslim rave party, verbatim, 19:21
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 19:20
- Let's make them look dumb T.J.... sloppy stupid !, Jeff…Relf, 19:19
- dedanoe goes supersonic, dedanoe, 19:11
- Re: Dandelion seed, Ian Stirling, 19:02
- T.J., Won't I need to contact you _Immediately_ after I get the quote ?, Jeff…Relf, 19:01
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Hexenmeister, 18:27
- Re: A Brief History of Stephen Hawking, Hexenmeister, 18:07
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 May 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 18:01
- Re: Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, Vert, 17:41
- Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information, RadicalLibertarian, 17:28
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 16:35
- Re: Question about General Relativity, T Wake, 16:34
- Re: Who's profiting ? How did they manage to do what OPEC couldn't ?, T Wake, 16:30
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, T Wake, 16:28
- Re: It isn't uncommon for Ethen to nab 4 Credit/Debit cards a day., T Wake, 16:22
- Re: curses, T Wake, 16:20
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol homeheating, T Wake, 16:13
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 16:10
- Re: Big bang metaphysics., T Wake, 16:10
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, Tom H., 16:04
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, tadchem, 16:03
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, J. J. Lodder, 16:00
- Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, tadchem, 15:58
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., T Wake, 15:53
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, tadchem, 15:52
- Re: Buying when the _Hard_ facts are right., T Wake, 15:51
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, ma1ibu, 15:46
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tj Frazir, 15:42
- Re: Although I post my aliased email address all over the place, I..., T Wake, 15:41
- Re: Although I post my aliased email address all over the place, I never get spam., T Wake, 15:40
- Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, Hexenmeister, 15:33
- Re: I'm just so flattered., tj Frazir, 15:29
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, PD, 15:28
- Re: Yea... once to learn by doing., tj Frazir, 15:13
- Re: I'm just so flattered., PD, 14:48
- Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 14:44
- Re: Anne is checking her stock., tj Frazir, 14:43
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Hexenmeister, 14:39
- Re: T.J., What should I tell a seller who agrees to my terms ? !, tj Frazir, 14:34
- I'm just so flattered., Jeff…Relf, 14:30
- Re: 73.7 cents per pound of 99.5 % Aluminuam ingots in China., tj Frazir, 14:24
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Mike, 14:03
- Re: They couldn't do it without me., PD, 13:51
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Henry Spencer, 13:20
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 12:45
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 12:42
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 12:33
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Sam Wormley, 12:25
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 12:23
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 12:16
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 12:13
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, mmeron, 12:13
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 12:04
- The Physics of the Tsunami, Coynil, 12:01
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Hexenmeister, 11:37
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 11:27
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 11:14
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 11:11
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 11:10
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 11:04
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, PD, 11:03
- Re: plasma question, mkogan, 11:02
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 10:51
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 10:50
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, PD, 10:48
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 10:47
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 10:43
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 10:43
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 10:41
- Anne is checking her stock., Jeff…Relf, 10:24
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 10:04
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 09:58
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 09:49
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 09:47
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 09:37
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 09:36
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 09:34
- Re: Inefficiency of secret research?, grisly, 09:19
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 09:09
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 09:04
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 08:54
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 08:51
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 08:28
- Who's profiting ? How did they manage to do what OPEC couldn't ?, Jeff…Relf, 08:16
- "Corrections to Special Relativity", Eht, 08:11
- T.J., What should I tell a seller who agrees to my terms ? !, Jeff…Relf, 08:09
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 08:08
- Paper: Fall in Earth's Magnetic Field Is Erratic, Robert Karl Stonjek, 08:07
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Bob, 07:58
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 07:58
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 07:54
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 07:52
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Josef Matz, 07:50
- Inefficiency of secret research?, isaackoi2, 07:45
- Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 07:45
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Josef Matz, 07:43
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 06:44
- Re: NaI scintillation counter efficiency, Jan Panteltje, 06:02
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 05:54
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 05:44
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 05:43
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 05:30
- Re: Uncle Al, jmfbahciv, 05:29
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 05:27
- Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 05:26
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 05:20
- Re: Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, tadchem, 05:15
- 20 to 30 tons at 73.7 cents per pound of 99.5 % Aluminuam ingots in China., Jeff…Relf, 05:15
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 05:12
- 73.7 cents per pound of 99.5 % Aluminuam ingots in China., Jeff…Relf, 04:42
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 04:35
- Ved Moola, SBA-Global.COM., Jeff…Relf, 04:23
- girls love to leave dedanoe, dedanoe, 04:18
- Re: Coin animation explained, hhc314, 04:03
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 03:46
- Yea... once to learn by doing., Jeff…Relf, 03:41
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability, OsherD, 02:30
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 02:30
- Coin animation explained, ma1ibu, 02:27
- Re: Newton's G (new), Ken S. Tucker, 02:25
- Re: Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability, OsherD, 02:23
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Schoenfeld, 02:02
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Sam Wormley, 02:00
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 01:40
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 01:37
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 01:36
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, noahdove7, 01:27
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 01:24
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, noahdove7, 01:23
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 01:20
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 01:05
- Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability, OsherD, 00:51
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 00:44
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 00:09
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 00:08
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 00:01
May 11, 2006
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 23:59
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Sam Wormley, 23:57
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Schoenfeld, 23:50
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 23:49
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Sam Wormley, 23:41
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 23:40
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Sam Wormley, 23:39
- Re: Once glance at the pump prices and you know what the dollar is ..., tj Frazir, 23:33
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 23:33
- Ships shed light on geomagnetic field, Sam Wormley, 23:32
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 23:16
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 23:06
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 22:48
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 22:31
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 22:21
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Schoenfeld, 22:08
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., john, 21:52
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 21:48
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, john, 21:44
- Re: Collatz 3n+1 Conjecture, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 21:37
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 21:33
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Phil Holman, 21:21
- Re: NaI scintillation counter efficiency, grisly, 21:01
- Re: A question of discrete space-time (the paper)., Ed Hanna, 21:00
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 20:58
- Re: NaI scintillation counter efficiency, john, 20:58
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 20:52
- Re: 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, Schoenfeld, 20:37
- Re: Collatz 3n+1 Conjecture, cafeinst, 20:33
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 20:32
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 20:30
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Bill Owen, 20:25
- Re: Collatz 3n+1 Conjecture, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 20:22
- NaI scintillation counter efficiency, Allan Adler, 20:21
- Re: Dandelion seed, cnctut, 20:12
- 9/11 Collapse Theory Fails Physics Reality Check, noahdove7, 20:05
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, PD, 19:53
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 19:51
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, muddy, 19:41
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 19:35
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 19:20
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, snapdragon31, 19:15
- Re: Newton's G (new), Ken S. Tucker, 19:00
- Re: They couldn't do it without me., tj Frazir, 18:55
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 18:51
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 18:42
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., platopes, 18:35
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 18:31
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 18:24
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 18:22
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 18:16
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 18:10
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 18:04
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Bob, 18:03
- Re: Imaging agent for Nuk stress test ?, john, 18:00
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, PD, 17:59
- Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric, FrediFizzx, 17:54
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 231), Phil Carmody, 17:50
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 17:46
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 17:44
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 17:38
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 17:33
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, mmeron, 17:12
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 17:10
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 17:08
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 17:02
- Re: Dandelion seed, Ian Stirling, 16:59
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 16:59
- Re: Dandelion seed, puppet_sock, 16:55
- Re: This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., puppet_sock, 16:47
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 16:45
- Re: i have two questions, tadchem, 16:38
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, tadchem, 16:29
- Re: Imaging agent for Nuk stress test ?, tadchem, 16:22
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 16:00
- This rock, this watery pearl, this pale blue dot., rick_sobie, 15:39
- Re: Newton's G (new), Ken S. Tucker, 15:37
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 15:10
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:06
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 15:05
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 14:46
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 14:42
- Re: Dandelion seed, jimp, 14:35
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 14:33
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 14:18
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 14:16
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 14:11
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 14:05
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 13:55
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 13:53
- Dandelion seed, Steve Nelson, 13:48
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 13:44
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 13:11
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Igor, 13:07
- Re: collision, briggs, 13:02
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 13:01
- Re: Plasma and fusion power, The Real Chris, 13:01
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Igor, 12:57
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 12:52
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 12:46
- Collatz 3n+1 Conjecture, cafeinst, 12:42
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 12:35
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 12:34
- Re: Uncle Al, ma1ibu, 12:10
- Re: collision, Thomas Smid, 11:55
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 11:33
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 11:27
- Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric, John C . Polasek, 11:26
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 11:19
- Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 11:07
- Re: once is not enough, john, 10:59
- Imaging agent for Nuk stress test ?, john, 10:52
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 10:38
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 10:36
- Re: Precession and Evolution, Helios http://members.fortunecity.com/juillet, 10:35
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 10:34
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 10:32
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 10:31
- Re: Uncle Al, Richard Herring, 10:22
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 10:17
- Re: Once glance at the pump prices and you know what the dollar is worth., Eric Gisse, 10:15
- A variation on the two slit experiment, kuriousoranj, 10:13
- Article: NASA Agrees To Cooperate With India On Lunar Mission, Robert Karl Stonjek, 10:12
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Mike, 10:10
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 10:09
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Mike, 10:05
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 10:04
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Eric Gisse, 10:04
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Greg Neill, 10:02
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, John C . Polasek, 10:01
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 09:53
- once is not enough, dedanoe, 09:45
- Re: tripin around the universe, dedanoe, 09:42
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 09:40
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 09:22
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, PD, 09:20
- Re: Newton's G (new), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:19
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 09:15
- Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 09:14
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:11
- They couldn't do it without me., Jeff…Relf, 09:11
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 09:08
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 09:01
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), tdp1001, 08:58
- Re: A Brief History of Stephen Hawking, donstockbauer, 08:57
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 08:54
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 08:52
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Bob, 08:41
- "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Eht, 08:34
- Once glance at the pump prices and you know what the dollar is worth., Jeff…Relf, 08:34
- Re: tripin around the universe, Dr. Planckenstein, 08:25
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 08:23
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 08:22
- I haven't built up any momentum yet, I can't find the inspiration., Jeff…Relf, 08:20
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 08:10
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Paul Schlyter, 07:43
- i have two questions, v, 07:38
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 07:26
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Greg Neill, 07:22
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 07:00
- Re: Uncle Al, jmfbahciv, 06:12
- Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 06:07
- PhysX chip now availabe for PC and in several graphics cards, Jan Panteltje, 06:04
- Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 05:55
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, tadchem, 05:45
- Re: More useful emotograms, tadchem, 05:37
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 05:31
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Fredrik Bulow, 05:17
- Re: hell, ma1ibu, 05:06
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 04:23
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 04:19
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 04:18
- Re: Newton's G (new), Harry, 04:10
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Harry, 03:58
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 03:54
- Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric, FrediFizzx, 03:35
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 03:31
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 03:29
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 03:17
- Re: More useful emotograms, Michael Gray, 03:12
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 02:55
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 02:55
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 02:54
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 02:53
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 39: Probability in Cosmology, OsherD, 02:40
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 39: Probability in Cosmology, OsherD, 02:11
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 01:56
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 01:54
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Double-A, 01:53
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Bilge, 01:53
- A Brief History of Stephen Hawking, Bits, 01:52
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 01:42
- Re: Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, Llanzlan Klazmon, 01:41
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, franklinhu, 01:35
- Re: How Neptune's largest moon, Triton, was captured, Chuck Taylor, 01:34
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., Roy L . Fuchs, 01:33
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 01:25
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Waldo, 01:23
- Sun calculates to be less massive for planets which are further out - sun mass anomaly, franklinhu, 01:13
May 10, 2006
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Greg Neill, 23:46
- Re: Plasma and fusion power, Llanzlan Klazmon, 23:25
- How Neptune's largest moon, Triton, was captured, Sam Wormley, 22:50
- Re: Ex-CIA analyst: Rumsfeld LIED about Iraqi link to Al Qaida, tj Frazir, 22:01
- Re: It isn't uncommon for Ethen to nab 4 Credit/Debit cards a day., tj Frazir, 21:49
- Re: particles = probabilities ?, Dr. Planckenstein, 21:49
- Re: It isn't uncommon for Ethen to nab 4 Credit/Debit cards a day., tj Frazir, 21:40
- Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric, FrediFizzx, 21:28
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), eleaticus, 21:01
- Re: Experimental Measurement of Space Metric, John C . Polasek, 20:36
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Bob, 20:28
- It isn't uncommon for Ethen to nab 4 Credit/Debit cards a day., Jeff…Relf, 20:25
- Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 19:53
- Re: I'd try some _Filtered_ cigs with a fine pot/tobacco blend., tj Frazir, 19:26
- Re: Force of my car crash?, CWatters, 18:50
- Re: collision, mmeron, 18:41
- Re: Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, CWatters, 18:39
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), jhnrmsdn, 18:30
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 18:27
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 18:23
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 18:14
- Re: hell, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 18:14
- Even More on BILLY MEIER & EXTRATERRESTRIALS -- Major Media Conspiracy Against Truth ----> Just like 911 Gov't Hoax & Man as Old as Coal <----, Ed Conrad, 18:11
- Even More on BILLY MEIER & EXTRATERRESTRIALS -- Major Media Conspiracy Against Truth ----> Just like 911 Gov't Hoax & Man as Old as Coal <----, Ed Conrad, 18:04
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, AllYou!, 18:03
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 17:49
- Re: Force of my car crash?, srp, 17:30
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Know edge, 17:06
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 16:55
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Randy Poe, 16:47
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Martin Hogbin, 16:42
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 16:41
- Re: carbon ring, Hexenmeister, 16:39
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 16:38
- Re: More useful emotograms, John Schutkeker, 16:33
- Re: Plasma and fusion power, Jan Panteltje, 16:32
- errata; was Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 16:28
- Re: Uncle Al, John Schutkeker, 16:25
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 16:21
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Mike, 16:11
- Re: Plasma and fusion power, isaackoi2, 16:02
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, tadchem, 15:59
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 15:57
- Re: Experiment#1, Hexenmeister, 15:56
- Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, tadchem, 15:54
- Re: Plasma and fusion power, Jan Panteltje, 15:44
- Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, MobyDikc, 15:33
- Plasma and fusion power, isaackoi2, 15:17
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 15:08
- Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 15:01
- Re: carbon ring, ma1ibu, 14:44
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 14:43
- Optical Sensitivity Curves for RGB?, hetware, 14:41
- Re: Experiment#1, OG, 14:33
- Re: collision, puppet_sock, 14:32
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Greg Neill, 14:27
- Re: history of physics, Greg Neill, 14:08
- Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?, Igor, 14:05
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 13:56
- Re: Force of my car crash?, briggs, 13:54
- hell, ma1ibu, 13:53
- Re: collision, PD, 13:52
- Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 13:37
- Re: Force of my car crash?, briggs, 13:34
- Re: Force of my car crash?, briggs, 13:31
- collision, Gunnar G, 13:31
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 13:30
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:25
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 13:23
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 13:20
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 13:17
- Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 13:11
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:07
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:05
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 13:03
- Can gravity be considered as prime force?, kumar, 13:02
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 13:02
- Re: Force of my car crash?, srp, 13:02
- Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 13:01
- Re: Absolute zero and fundamental particles ?, srp, 12:56
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 12:52
- Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 12:48
- Re: Absolute zero and fundamental particles ?, mmeron, 12:45
- Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 12:44
- Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 12:41
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:40
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 12:39
- Re: Force of my car crash?, srp, 12:39
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 12:34
- Re: Force of my car crash?, briggs, 12:31
- Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 12:26
- Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 12:19
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Randy Poe, 12:14
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:10
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 12:02
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:02
- Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 12:01
- Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 12:01
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Sam Wormley, 11:49
- Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 11:47
- Re: Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 11:39
- Re: Force of my car crash?, PD, 11:37
- Re: Newton's G (new), Richard Schultz, 11:32
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 11:32
- Re: Force of my car crash?, Sam Wormley, 11:22
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 11:17
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Harry, 11:13
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 11:11
- Force of my car crash?, johnfromberkeley, 11:09
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 11:05
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, PD, 10:59
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:53
- MORE ON BILLY MEIER and the Henoch Prophecies -- Extraterrestrials -- UFOs, Ed Conrad, 10:25
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 10:16
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Reverend Dave, 10:12
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 10:10
- Re: Vast Active Living Intelligence? VALIS, greysky, 09:55
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 09:36
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 09:27
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 09:26
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 09:15
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 09:11
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 09:06
- I'd try some _Filtered_ cigs with a fine pot/tobacco blend., Jeff…Relf, 08:55
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 08:36
- "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Eht, 08:32
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 08:32
- ED CONRAD WILL WIN IN THE LONG RUN -- 1996 Prediction Coming True -- Evolution Going Belly Up -- Man as Old as Coal, Ed Conrad, 08:31
- Re: Absolute zero and fundamental particles ?, Sam Wormley, 08:31
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Harry, 08:24
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, jcon, 08:19
- Re: Vast Active Living Intelligence? VALIS, donstockbauer, 07:48
- Re: you say your GOD is almighty?, kogs, 07:40
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 07:23
- Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 07:11
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 06:59
- Absolute zero and fundamental particles ?, Phas, 06:54
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 06:53
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 05:48
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Know edge, 05:32
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), BernardZ, 05:10
- tripin around the universe, dedanoe, 04:45
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:37
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:32
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:30
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:28
- Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, realist, 04:14
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, Hexenmeister, 03:39
- Re: Really a different thread., Hexenmeister, 03:39
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 03:30
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 03:23
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 03:21
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 03:19
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 03:16
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 03:10
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 03:06
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 02:56
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 02:45
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., Roy L . Fuchs, 02:43
- Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs i..., Roy L . Fuchs, 02:32
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 02:25
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 02:16
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 02:10
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 02:07
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 02:05
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 01:45
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 01:39
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 01:39
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 01:35
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 01:20
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 00:54
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 00:49
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 00:48
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38.2 Orientation Toward Change in Elasticity, Springs, Strings, Riccati, john, 00:45
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 00:45
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38.2 Orientation Toward Change in Elasticity, Springs, Strings, Riccati, john, 00:32
May 09, 2006
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 23:58
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 23:53
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 23:50
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 23:46
- Re: particles = probabilities ?, Dr. Planckenstein, 23:46
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38: Orientation Toward Change (Derivatives), john, 23:44
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, The TimeLord, 23:41
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 23:01
- Re: I think I'll need weeks, not days., tj Frazir, 22:56
- Re: Buying when the _Hard_ facts are right., tj Frazir, 22:47
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, tomgee, 22:18
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 21:57
- Re: "America, you lost. ... I won.", donstockbauer, 21:42
- Re: The proof of mass vector., yen, ka-in, 21:19
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 21:19
- Re: OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Know edge, 21:16
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Schoenfeld, 21:15
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 21:14
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, stephen, 20:58
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Eric Gisse, 20:58
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 20:52
- Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, tadchem, 20:48
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 20:43
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, tadchem, 20:40
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 20:40
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 20:38
- Re: More useful emotograms, tadchem, 20:33
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 20:25
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Schoenfeld, 20:13
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 20:11
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Schoenfeld, 20:06
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, rotchm, 19:21
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 19:16
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 18:44
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 18:41
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 18:35
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 18:34
- OVER 100 FREE BOOKS & SCI JOURNALS (HOW TO DOWNLOAD), Know edge, 18:30
- Re: Has anybody else been abducted by aliens?, Hexenmeister, 18:27
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:24
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 18:19
- Re: Really a different thread., Prometheus, 18:18
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 18:18
- Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, Hexenmeister, 18:09
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Hexenmeister, 18:08
- Re: Really a different thread., Hexenmeister, 18:08
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:07
- Re: concentration sensor uing UV light, CWatters, 17:50
- Re: Gauss's Law, mmeron, 17:49
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Hexenmeister, 17:49
- Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 17:45
- Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 17:44
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, snapdragon31, 17:32
- Re: Gauss's Law, PD, 17:23
- Gauss's Law, Nishu, 17:12
- Re: history of physics, PD, 17:09
- history of physics, Gunnar G, 17:03
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., riplin, 16:41
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 16:18
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, Henning Makholm, 16:15
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 16:07
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 16:01
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 15:53
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 15:52
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 15:47
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 15:44
- Re: Really a different thread., Hexenmeister, 15:44
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 15:39
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 15:38
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:33
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 15:30
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 15:27
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:20
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:19
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 15:18
- Re: thermodynamics, CWatters, 15:15
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, CWatters, 15:14
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 15:14
- Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:53
- Re: Really a different thread., Prometheus, 14:45
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Timo A. Nieminen, 14:37
- Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 13:55
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 13:43
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:35
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:34
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 13:33
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 13:32
- Has anybody else been abducted by aliens?, tripod, 13:31
- Re: thermodynamics, OG, 13:11
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, PD, 13:11
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 13:07
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, faceless, 13:07
- Re: Uncle Al, FrediFizzx, 13:01
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:58
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 12:58
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 12:56
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 12:54
- I think I'll need weeks, not days., Jeff…Relf, 12:53
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 12:51
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker, 12:50
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 12:49
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 12:46
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 12:46
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 12:45
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:44
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 12:40
- Buying when the _Hard_ facts are right., Jeff…Relf, 12:36
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:35
- Re: Newton's G (new), srp, 12:29
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:23
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:23
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:14
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:11
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, faceless, 12:09
- Standard Model versus A Guage as the Angle, assanreality@xxxxxxxxx, 12:01
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 11:52
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Golden Boar, 11:52
- Re: carbon ring, Hexenmeister, 11:45
- Re: Isn't it just a matter of reporting to the tax authorities ?, tj Frazir, 11:42
- Re: thermodynamics, Hexenmeister, 11:41
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 11:40
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 11:36
- curses, kurtstocklmeir, 11:25
- Re: thermodynamics, Henning Makholm, 11:19
- Re: carbon ring, ma1ibu, 11:19
- Re: WEHT: Uncle Al, ma1ibu, 11:09
- Re: Nigel Trebell of the Eurotrade Partnership Ltd, U.K., tj Frazir, 11:06
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 11:06
- WEHT: Uncle Al, John Schutkeker, 11:03
- Re: More useful emotograms, John Schutkeker, 11:02
- Re: More useful emotograms, John Schutkeker, 11:00
- Re: Isn't it just a matter of reporting to the tax authorities ?, tj Frazir, 10:38
- concentration sensor uing UV light, Andrew, 10:31
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Mike, 10:30
- Re: thermodynamics, Ian Lazarus, 10:22
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 10:21
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 10:17
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 10:10
- Re: particles = probabilities ?, mushnik, 10:10
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 10:08
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 10:05
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 10:05
- Re: Really a different thread., Hexenmeister, 10:01
- Re: Really a different thread., Hexenmeister, 10:01
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 09:50
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, dda1, 09:48
- particles = probabilities ?, Dr. Planckenstein, 09:45
- Re: Precession and Evolution, mushnik, 09:42
- "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Eht, 09:24
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Randy Poe, 08:47
- Re: Precession and Evolution, donstockbauer, 08:21
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 08:11
- Re: Isn't it just a matter of reporting to the tax authorities ?, tdp1001, 08:09
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 08:05
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Harry, 07:56
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 07:46
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 07:46
- Re: carbon ring, Hexenmeister, 07:40
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, Hexenmeister, 07:40
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 07:37
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, jmfbahciv, 07:29
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 07:21
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Harry, 07:14
- ExIm.GOV wires cash to their account when we see your load on the boat., Jeff…Relf, 07:12
- Re: Question about General Relativity, jmfbahciv, 07:04
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 06:36
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 06:34
- The Yellow_Pages ?, Jeff…Relf, 05:58
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 05:50
- Re: The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Eric Gisse, 05:47
- Nigel Trebell of the Eurotrade Partnership Ltd, U.K., Jeff…Relf, 05:43
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, jmfbahciv, 05:37
- Re: Precession and Evolution, Sven Hesse, 05:16
- Precession and Evolution, klaudiozic, 05:11
- Re: Experiment#1, Michael Gray, 04:09
- Re: Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 03:41
- The formula E^2=(mc^2)^2 + ((pc)^2 is not valid for the photon case, Y.Porat, 03:29
- Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 03:27
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 03:10
- Newton's G (new), FrediFizzx, 03:02
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, FrediFizzx, 02:45
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, Y.Porat, 02:34
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38.2 Orientation Toward Change in Elasticity, Springs, Strings, Riccati, OsherD, 01:09
- Re: New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks simple. This true?, Paul Cardinale, 01:00
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38.2 Orientation Toward Change in Elasticity, Springs, Strings, Riccati, OsherD, 00:51
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38.2 Orientation Toward Change in Elasticity, Springs, Strings, Riccati, OsherD, 00:39
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 00:31
- Re: thermodynamics, Hexenmeister, 00:21
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, Quantum_Ranger, 00:12
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 00:08
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 00:01
- carbon ring, ma1ibu, 00:00
May 08, 2006
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', mmeron, 23:50
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 23:33
- Re: New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks sim..., tj Frazir, 23:31
- Re: New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks sim..., tj Frazir, 23:28
- Re: Energy slows down clocks., John C . Polasek, 23:08
- Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs i..., tj Frazir, 22:55
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 22:52
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 22:51
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 22:46
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 22:45
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, mushnik, 22:30
- Re: plankton-sized bits of plastic, donstockbauer, 22:12
- Interaction term in the field Lagrangian, roman, 21:51
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 21:43
- plankton-sized bits of plastic, ma1ibu, 21:37
- Re: Question about General Relativity, carlip-nospam, 21:20
- Re: Aluminum prices., tj Frazir, 20:54
- Re: Aluminum prices. $ 50 MUSD science in motion, tj Frazir, 20:31
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, Edward Green, 20:02
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Edward Green, 19:51
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Mike, 19:48
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, mmeron, 19:41
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, arvee, 19:25
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 19:19
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 19:17
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 18:50
- Re: Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, rotchm, 18:43
- Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, MobyDikc, 18:35
- Re: Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, Randy Poe, 18:22
- Does anybody know somebody that has eaten 50 hard boiled eggs in 60 minutes?, MobyDikc, 18:10
- Why does light slow when not in a vacuum?, Dave (from the UK), 17:58
- Re: thermodynamics, OG, 17:49
- Re: Newton's G, srp, 17:27
- Re: More useful emotograms, tadchem, 17:22
- thermodynamics, Ian Lazarus, 17:15
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 16:29
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 16:29
- Re: before life and after death, Rushtown, 16:13
- Re: before life and after death, Felix Rawlings, 16:04
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38.1: Fokker-Planck Equation, OsherD, 16:02
- Astrophysics is stellar type of Magnetism, dedanoe, 16:02
- Re: before life and after death, rationalist, 15:54
- Re: before life and after death, rationalist, 15:51
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38: Orientation Toward Change (Derivatives), OsherD, 15:45
- Re: New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks simple. This true?, Jan Panteltje, 15:34
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 15:32
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 38: Orientation Toward Change (Derivatives), OsherD, 15:23
- Re: New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks simple. This true?, CWatters, 15:13
- Re: Aluminum prices., tj Frazir, 15:10
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Greg Hansen, 14:56
- Re: Really a different thread., Prometheus, 14:37
- Re: Although I post my aliased email address all over the place, I ..., tj Frazir, 14:34
- More useful emotograms, John Schutkeker, 14:25
- Re: UK UFO free, AlexJones, 14:12
- Re: New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks simple. This true?, Sam Wormley, 13:53
- Re: Dewey B. Larson, ma1ibu, 13:51
- Re: Dewey B. Larson, ma1ibu, 13:47
- New vid says faster than light travel is possible and looks simple. This true?, Spike, 13:36
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 13:31
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 13:29
- UK UFO free, Jan Panteltje, 13:20
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 13:15
- Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, top9, 13:09
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 13:08
- Aluminum prices., Jeff…Relf, 13:02
- Dewey B. Larson, ma1ibu, 12:42
- Dewey B. Larson, ma1ibu, 12:38
- Re: before life and after death, Rushtown, 12:35
- before life and after death, dedanoe, 12:19
- Although I post my aliased email address all over the place, I never get spam., Jeff…Relf, 12:13
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 11:46
- Re: Question about General Relativity, John C . Polasek, 11:42
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 11:34
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, cnctut, 11:28
- Re: Isn't it just a matter of reporting to the tax authorities ?, tj Frazir, 11:25
- Re: curses, Richard Herring, 11:23
- Re: Steve Liu, Aluminum_Ingots.JPG, tj Frazir, 11:22
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, William . Mook, 11:16
- I see homeless people camping all over the place... thank you Seattle., Jeff…Relf, 11:14
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 11:11
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 11:05
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
- Re: twin paradox for simple minds., The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
- Re: Partitions and Invariances of the Universe, AlexJones, 10:41
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 10:35
- Re: Question about General Relativity, John C . Polasek, 10:27
- Scrap copper is only $ 1.30 to $ 1.80 a pound., Jeff…Relf, 10:14
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 10:01
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 May 06 Washington, DC, Andy Resnick, 09:44
- Learning by doing., Jeff…Relf, 09:38
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 09:10
- I'm using the term Finders_Fee now... wink wink., Jeff…Relf, 09:05
- Offered Hisham El Feky 60 cents for clean scrap, FOB., Jeff…Relf, 08:55
- AN APOLOGY TO ELVIS THE PELVIS -- Mistaken Identify -- Alas, It's Not His Gas -- The King Sighted in Wal-Mart, Ed Conrad, 08:50
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, srp, 08:29
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 08:28
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 08:24
- Re: Isn't it just a matter of reporting to the tax authorities ?, tdp1001, 08:20
- Re: Newton's G, srp, 08:19
- Isn't it just a matter of reporting to the tax authorities ?, Jeff…Relf, 07:42
- administer dedanoe's impact, dedanoe, 07:39
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, jmfbahciv, 07:35
- Re: Critical size (or Mass?) of the particle at which Macro transitions to Micro (Ref: Double Slit Experiment), Ravindra, 06:16
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 08, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:41
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, tadchem, 05:35
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 05:25
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 05:21
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 05:13
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 04:56
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, Brad Guth, 04:29
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, Brad Guth, 04:20
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Schoenfeld, 04:15
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', mmeron, 04:12
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, Eric Gisse, 03:53
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 03:52
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Jerry, 03:47
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 03:41
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 03:39
- Looking for Pierre Curie, Bits, 03:14
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Brad Guth, 03:11
- Re: Partitions and Invariances of the Universe, OsherD, 03:01
- Re: twin paradox for simple minds., Eric Gisse, 02:56
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Brad Guth, 02:54
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Eric Gisse, 02:54
- Michael Faraday - world of biography, Bits, 02:48
- Re: Partitions and Invariances of the Universe, OsherD, 02:48
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Josef Oswald, 02:45
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, FrediFizzx, 02:38
- Partitions and Invariances of the Universe, OsherD, 02:35
- Re: Question about General Relativity, FrediFizzx, 02:28
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, Eric Gisse, 02:20
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 02:05
- Re: Islamist-Like Disinformation Replies To My Nonrenormalization Thread, OsherD, 02:04
- Re: Newton's G, FrediFizzx, 02:03
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Sam Wormley, 01:33
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 01:18
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, FrediFizzx, 01:17
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 00:48
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 00:46
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 00:24
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 00:24
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 00:24
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 00:24
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 00:24
- Re: Steve Liu, Aluminum_Ingots.JPG, tdp1001, 00:19
- Re: Energy debt and Energy Credit, Paul Cardinale, 00:12
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Reverend Dave, 00:04
May 07, 2006
- Re: How do I price scrap ? Always 25 cents ? The quality varies ..., tj Frazir, 23:51
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Eric Gisse, 23:48
- Re: Question about General Relativity, tdp1001, 23:41
- Re: How do I price scrap ? Always 25 cents ? The quality varies a..., tj Frazir, 23:13
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, Eric Gisse, 23:11
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Eric Gisse, 23:06
- Re: Yusov Ivan of Ancuver in Vladivostok., tj Frazir, 22:56
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Edward Green, 22:49
- Re: Newton's G, srp, 22:48
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, tj Frazir, 22:32
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Dik T. Winter, 22:21
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, tj Frazir, 22:18
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 22:03
- Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 21:35
- Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 21:34
- Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, Alex Jones, 21:23
- Energy debt and Energy Credit, acctope, 21:23
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 21:09
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, The Ghost In The Machine, 21:00
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 20:47
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 20:42
- Spacelike singularity of non-rotating black hole, Jack Sarfatti, 20:36
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 20:19
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 20:03
- Re: Islamist-Like Disinformation Replies To My Nonrenormalization Thread, Edward Green, 20:00
- Re: "Gravity", The Ghost In The Machine, 20:00
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, The Ghost In The Machine, 20:00
- How do I price scrap ? Always 25 cents ? The quality varies a lot., Jeff…Relf, 19:51
- Re: spectral density/Johnson noise, Edward Green, 19:50
- Yusov Ivan of Ancuver in Vladivostok., Jeff…Relf, 19:29
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Timo Nieminen, 19:27
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, mmeron, 19:07
- Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, Roy L . Fuchs, 19:04
- Ancuver, in the Russian Federation, Jeff…Relf, 19:02
- Re: twin paradox for simple minds., The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 18:57
- Re: Newton's G, FrediFizzx, 18:50
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Henning Makholm, 18:48
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 18:46
- Re: PRIZES GALORE -- Identify the Evolutionist -- NO GAS CRISIS -- ..., tj Frazir, 18:29
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Martin Hogbin, 18:25
- Re: RUSH LIMBAUGH NOT THE GAS-PRODUCING EVOLUTIONIST WHALE -- A Pub..., tj Frazir, 18:25
- Re: Question about General Relativity, lugita15, 18:21
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, tj Frazir, 18:19
- Re: Wonsik Park, Wooshin Metal Co., Ltd., tj Frazir, 18:12
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 18:11
- Re: I've yet to scope out the aluminum ingot market., tj Frazir, 18:05
- Article: On the Light of the First Stars, Robert Karl Stonjek, 18:04
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 18:01
- Re: Wonsik Park, Wooshin Metal Co., Ltd., tj Frazir, 18:00
- Re: Wonsik Park, Wooshin Metal Co., Ltd., tj Frazir, 17:56
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 17:56
- Re: I've yet to scope out the aluminum ingot market., tj Frazir, 17:55
- Re: Critical size (or Mass?) of the particle at which Macro transitions to Micro (Ref: Double Slit Experiment), Materion, 17:54
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 17:54
- Re: Question about General Relativity, Martin Hogbin, 17:51
- Re: I've yet to scope out the aluminum ingot market., tj Frazir, 17:50
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, tj Frazir, 17:48
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 17:47
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, tj Frazir, 17:40
- Re: "Gravity", Hexenmeister, 17:37
- Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 17:37
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 17:35
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Balios, 17:35
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 17:32
- Re: Question about General Relativity, lugita15, 17:28
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, cnctut, 17:28
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, B1ackwater, 17:26
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 17:23
- Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, Hexenmeister, 17:20
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 17:20
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 17:01
- Re: Newton's G, srp, 16:59
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, tadchem, 16:48
- Re: twin paradox for simple minds., Hexenmeister, 16:38
- Re: Newton's G (was: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions), FrediFizzx, 16:19
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, srp, 16:16
- Re: Question about General Relativity, srp, 16:13
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 16:04
- Re: Really a different thread., Prometheus, 15:56
- Question about General Relativity, lugita15, 15:43
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 15:22
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 15:14
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, mmeron, 15:07
- Re: "Gravity", The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 14:54
- Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, Quantum_Ranger, 14:52
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, srp, 14:52
- Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, Quantum_Ranger, 14:47
- Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, CWatters, 14:38
- Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, Sum One Dumb, 14:28
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: CHARGE! CHARGE!, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: Rocket lift-off questions., The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: twin paradox for simple minds., The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, OsherD, 13:49
- Re: THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION -- It's a Real Gasser..., John Griffin, 13:45
- Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, OsherD, 13:37
- Re: Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, OsherD, 13:27
- Re: size of ITER vs. JET and Fusion Barrier Principle Re: electric versus petrol mowers, a_plutonium, 13:26
- Statisical Decision Theory of the Physical Universe, OsherD, 13:23
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Ken S. Tucker, 13:10
- Re: Really the same idiot., Martin Hogbin, 13:08
- Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 13:07
- Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, top9, 13:05
- Re: twin paradox for simple minds., The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Wonsik Park, Wooshin Metal Co., Ltd., Jeff…Relf, 12:59
- Re: Cyclic universe could explain cosmological constant?, Bruce Scott TOK, 11:41
- Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 11:35
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Edward Green, 11:15
- Re: Instantaneous Axis of Rotation, Edward Green, 10:59
- Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, Leon, 10:23
- Re: Integration question, RadicalLibertarian, 10:21
- "Gravity", Eht, 09:59
- Re: Mystery Sand on Saturn Moon - Titan, tadchem, 09:50
- Re: Experiment#1, OG, 09:49
- Re: blue, green and red!, tadchem, 09:33
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Henning Makholm, 08:48
- Things dissipate... the universe is cooling., Jeff…Relf, 08:47
- Re: Rocket lift-off questions., Jan Panteltje, 08:43
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Jan Panteltje, 08:40
- Re: blue, green and red!, Henning Makholm, 08:37
- Re: blue, green and red!, Henning Makholm, 08:32
- I've yet to scope out the aluminum ingot market., Jeff…Relf, 07:56
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, walksalone, 07:52
- Re: Really a different thread., Prometheus, 05:39
- Really the same idiot., Hexenmeister, 05:37
- Re: Rocket lift-off questions., Hexenmeister, 05:37
- dying to live or dying to know -- unification, dedanoe, 05:27
- Re: Critical size (or Mass?) of the particle at which Macro transitions to Micro (Ref: Double Slit Experiment), Materion, 05:01
- Re: twin paradox for simple minds., Hexenmeister, 04:55
- Re: Really a different thread., Martin Hogbin, 04:51
- Re: Experiment#1, Hexenmeister, 04:47
- Re: CHARGE! CHARGE!, Hexenmeister, 04:45
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 37: Boundary is Fundamental, OsherD, 04:28
- Proof of P(A-->B-->C) - P(A<-->B<-->C) = P(A' C) in Response to the Troll, OsherD, 03:39
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 36: Recency and Primacy in Physics and Psychology, OsherD, 03:25
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 36: Recency and Primacy in Physics and Psychology, OsherD, 03:16
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Paul E. Bennett, 02:16
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 01:49
- Re: size of ITER vs. JET and Fusion Barrier Principle Re: electric versus petrol mowers, a_plutonium, 01:49
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 01:28
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 01:26
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 01:17
- Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 01:05
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, jimp, 01:05
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Herman Family, 00:04
- Re: I'm still quite clueless., tj Frazir, 00:02
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
May 06, 2006
- Re: Steve Liu wants 1.38 a pound., tj Frazir, 23:57
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Herman Family, 23:35
- Steve Liu wants 1.38 a pound., Jeff…Relf, 23:20
- Re: twin paradox for simple minds., Eric Gisse, 23:19
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 36: Recency and Primacy in Physics and Psychology, Allex Jones, 23:19
- Re: Experiment#1, rAgAv, 23:06
- Re: twin paradox for simple minds., The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: Rocket lift-off questions., The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: CHARGE! CHARGE!, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: blue, green and red!, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, NOspam, 22:31
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 22:28
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 22:05
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 22:01
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 21:47
- Re: Article: Up and Down, but Not Strange, FrediFizzx, 21:41
- On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, yinbing-zhou, 21:38
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 36: Recency and Primacy in Physics and Psychology, OsherD, 21:17
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 36: Recency and Primacy in Physics and Psychology, OsherD, 21:11
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 21:10
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, cnctut, 21:06
- Re: I'm waiting on Steve Liu's quote... how much, and at what price., tj Frazir, 21:01
- I'm still quite clueless., Jeff…Relf, 20:52
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 20:41
- Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, RadicalLibertarian, 20:02
- Article: Up and Down, but Not Strange, Robert Karl Stonjek, 19:48
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 19:41
- Re: I quoted Liu 65 cents, he's in Ningbo China., tj Frazir, 19:36
- Re: I quoted Liu 65 cents, he's in Ningbo China., tj Frazir, 19:11
- I'm waiting on Steve Liu's quote... how much, and at what price., Jeff…Relf, 19:11
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 19:06
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 18:37
- Big bang metaphysics., Jeff…Relf, 18:21
- Re: I quoted Liu 65 cents, he's in Ningbo China., tj Frazir, 18:12
- Re: I quoted Liu 65 cents, he's in Ningbo China., tj Frazir, 18:05
- Re: I quoted Liu 65 cents, he's in Ningbo China., tj Frazir, 18:00
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Ken S. Tucker, 17:44
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 17:30
- Re: blue, green and red!, Hexenmeister, 17:26
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 16:46
- Re: "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, tadchem, 16:45
- Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 16:42
- Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 16:37
- Re: blue, green and red!, tadchem, 16:24
- I quoted Liu 65 cents, he's in Ningbo China., Jeff…Relf, 16:22
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 16:18
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, Ken S. Tucker, 16:15
- Re: Schrödinger equation., tadchem, 16:13
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, William . Mook, 16:12
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 16:08
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 15:39
- Re: Steve Liu, Aluminum_Ingots.JPG, tj Frazir, 15:37
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 15:34
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 15:17
- Re: Steve Liu, Aluminum_Ingots.JPG, tj Frazir, 15:13
- Re: Steve Liu, Aluminum_Ingots.JPG, tj Frazir, 15:09
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 15:02
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, tadchem, 14:58
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, William . Mook, 14:44
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 14:44
- Re: why umbrella black in colour, Hexenmeister, 14:42
- Re: why umbrella black in colour, tadchem, 14:35
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 14:26
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, Sum One Dumb, 14:22
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 14:15
- Re: why umbrella black in colour, Jan Panteltje, 14:12
- Re: why umbrella black in colour, Sam Wormley, 13:57
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, Sum One Dumb, 13:55
- Re: you don't have a thing fund-a-mental in your physics, dedanoe, 13:37
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:34
- Re: why umbrella black in colour, Jan Panteltje, 13:32
- Re: Experiment#1, CWatters, 13:29
- you don't have a thing fund-a-mental in your physics, dedanoe, 13:26
- Re: why umbrella black in colour, CWatters, 13:22
- Re: why umbrella black in colour, cnctut, 13:20
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:18
- why umbrella black in colour, mushtaq, 13:17
- OK, so my credit is bad. I'll give you a couple points on the interest, just look at the downpayment. C'mon., Sum One Dumb, 13:09
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, Edward Green, 13:08
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:07
- Re: Elementary Thermodynamics question, cnctut, 13:00
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:57
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:51
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:26
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Edward Green, 12:17
- Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Herb Martin, 12:17
- Steve Liu, Aluminum_Ingots.JPG, Jeff…Relf, 12:16
- Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, Sum One Dumb, 12:13
- Elementary Thermodynamics question, Boo, 12:06
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Sunny123, 12:05
- curses, kstocklmeir, 11:51
- curses, kstocklmeir, 11:48
- Re: blue, green and red!, Edward Green, 11:31
- size of ITER vs. JET and Fusion Barrier Principle Re: electric versus petrol mowers, a_plutonium, 11:26
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Thomas Smid, 11:26
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Thomas Smid, 11:22
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 10:53
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Jan Panteltje, 10:52
- "Memory" effects of a spinning disk, top9, 10:39
- Re: aligned galaxies, ma1ibu, 10:29
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Herman Family, 10:22
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes' luna2, Brad Guth, 10:04
- Re: Experiment#1, jimp, 09:55
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., jimp, 09:45
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Greg Hansen, 09:31
- Please credit me 1 mitzvah, and I will repay you by eradicating the mathematical meshugas., Sum One Dumb, 09:26
- "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Eht, 09:03
- Re: Experiment#1, Hexenmeister, 08:54
- Re: Experiment#1, Sum One Dumb, 08:27
- Re: try dedanoe's experiment, Sum One Dumb, 08:24
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, CWatters, 08:02
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Mike, 06:37
- Re: A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, Hexenmeister, 06:37
- Re: Why I am an Athiest, Jan Panteltje, 06:33
- Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Bob Cain, 05:47
- Re: Isaac Newton - World Of Biography, Bob Cain, 05:45
- Mr. Steve Liu of the Ningbo HongLing Factory in Ningbo., Jeff…Relf, 05:42
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Thomas Smid, 05:31
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Thomas Smid, 05:31
- I'm willing to explore T.J.'s methods, to see where it takes me., Jeff…Relf, 05:29
- anal orgy analogy, dedanoe, 05:15
- Re: Why doesn't the electron fall on the proton in the L=0 states?, freezer, 05:14
- try dedanoe's experiment, dedanoe, 05:13
- Re: Why doesn't the electron fall on the proton in the L=0 states?, freezer, 05:02
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., T Wake, 03:59
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., T Wake, 03:58
- Experiment#1, rAgAv, 03:42
- Re: electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, Surfer, 03:36
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 03:21
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 35: Holographic Principle and Perception, OsherD, 03:12
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 03:10
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 03:03
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 35: Holographic Principle and Perception, OsherD, 02:59
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 02:51
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 02:26
- electric versus petrol mowers; electric versus petrol home heating, a_plutonium, 02:02
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, tj Frazir, 01:51
- Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, 00:55
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Brad Guth, 00:44
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 00:40
- Steal This Book, Sum One Dumb, 00:12
- Re: Integration question, RadicalLibertarian, 00:06
May 05, 2006
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 23:53
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 23:44
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 23:35
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 23:19
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 22:54
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Strife767, 22:44
- DONT READ THIS Re: Which Way Information For Dummies., Sum One Dumb, 22:21
- Re: Gravity, it's "energy source", and a bowling ball on a matress, Mike Ruskai, 22:17
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 22:06
- PRECISION MICROEXPLOSIONS, Sam Wormley, 22:06
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, john w, 21:42
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Timo A. Nieminen, 21:26
- Re: Integration question, RadicalLibertarian, 21:03
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., jimp, 20:45
- Cyclic universe could explain cosmological constant?, Sam Wormley, 20:24
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Edward Green, 20:07
- Time constant calculation for proton and electron, Jerry, 20:03
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Edward Green, 20:03
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Art Deco, 19:37
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., T Wake, 19:28
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 19:26
- Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun atall., T Wake, 19:26
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., T Wake, 19:25
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, Uncle Al, 19:19
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 19:12
- Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, tj Frazir, 19:11
- Why I am an Athiest, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 19:08
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 19:00
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., tj Frazir, 18:52
- Re: Hold floating conferences and have companies send their employe..., tj Frazir, 18:43
- Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., tj Frazir, 18:26
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Eric Gisse, 18:17
- Re: HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, Steve Dufour, 18:08
- Re: Should OneStonian Wear A Special Hat?, Hexenmeister, 17:44
- Re: aligned galaxies, Hexenmeister, 17:29
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, T Wake, 17:25
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, T Wake, 17:24
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 17:19
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 May 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 16:54
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 16:42
- Re: spectral density/Johnson noise, Allex Jones, 16:41
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 16:41
- Re: The Moon has plentiful oxygen, Allex Jones, 16:39
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Eric Gisse, 16:15
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, T Wake, 16:13
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, T Wake, 16:11
- Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., T Wake, 16:09
- Should OneStonian Wear A Special Hat?, Jan Panteltje, 16:03
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., T Wake, 16:00
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 16:00
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Eric Gisse, 15:56
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, Timo A. Nieminen, 15:54
- Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., Randy Poe, 15:23
- The Moon has plentiful oxygen, Sam Wormley, 15:22
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:18
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:18
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 15:16
- HELLO Endless Time & Space! Farewell Religion!, clitteigh, 15:15
- I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM ., Jeff…Relf, 15:12
- Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., Eric Gisse, 15:05
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Eric Gisse, 15:02
- Re: Hottest topic in physics, Jan Panteltje, 15:01
- Re: Net Neutrality, Jan Panteltje, 15:00
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 14:57
- Re: Net Neutrality, Igor, 14:50
- Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., T Wake, 14:50
- Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., Eric Gisse, 14:48
- Re: Hottest topic in physics, Eric Gisse, 14:45
- Electron affinity for semiconducting oxides, JAH, 14:42
- Hottest topic in physics, Sam Wormley, 14:39
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:38
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 14:27
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., T Wake, 14:21
- Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, Randy Poe, 14:17
- Re: Hold floating conferences and have companies send their employees to it., T Wake, 14:16
- Re: Fame and wealth is also about _Who_ Votes_For/Pays you., T Wake, 14:16
- Re: I need one _Big_ seller., T Wake, 14:15
- Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, T Wake, 14:13
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:13
- Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., T Wake, 14:08
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Mike, 14:07
- Cool Physics site, foertter, 13:48
- Re: blue, green and red!, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 13:31
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 13:12
- Re: curses, donstockbauer, 12:40
- Re: pressure from airspeed, drag calculation, Richard Herring, 12:16
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Julian Becker, 12:07
- curses, kstocklmeir, 12:03
- Re: I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Eric Gisse, 11:47
- Re: Why I believe in Athiesm., Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:44
- I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians, Jan Panteltje, 11:41
- Re: ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, antixdaxvincixcode@xxxxxxxxx, 11:10
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:54
- Re: aligned galaxies, ma1ibu, 10:27
- Re: aligned galaxies, ma1ibu, 10:07
- Re: Which Way Information For Dummies., RadicalLibertarian, 09:51
- Re: simultaniety(RE), Hexenmeister, 09:43
- "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Eht, 09:26
- Re: Which Way Information For Dummies., RadicalLibertarian, 09:05
- Re: Which Way Information For Dummies., Greg Neill, 09:05
- Re: spectral density/Johnson noise, Andy Resnick, 09:02
- ST. JUDAS ISCARIOT, PRAY FOR US -- Deceit, Deception, Collusion and Conspiracy by Catholic Church -- Tampering With Original Gospel, Ed Conrad, 09:02
- Re: THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION -- It's a Real Gasser..., Kurt, 08:39
- Re: Work - impulse, Mike, 07:54
- Re: Work - impulse, briggs, 07:48
- Re: Work - impulse, Mike, 07:36
- Re: Why we do not care., Vince, 07:31
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, jmfbahciv, 07:25
- Re: Why we do not care., Bob, 07:10
- Re: THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION -- It's a Real Gasser..., Chadwick Stone©, 07:09
- Fame and wealth is also about _Who_ Votes_For/Pays you., Jeff…Relf, 07:06
- Re: Paper: Why the Cosmological Constant Is Small and Positive, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 06:35
- Re: Net Neutrality, Jan Panteltje, 05:59
- Re: Net Neutrality, Schoenfeld, 05:50
- Re: Net Neutrality, Jan Panteltje, 05:30
- Re: Net Neutrality, Jan Panteltje, 05:28
- Hold floating conferences and have companies send their employees to it., Jeff…Relf, 05:20
- Re: Why doesn't the electron fall on the proton in the L=0 states?, Henning Makholm, 05:00
- dying to live?, dedanoe, 04:52
- Re: It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., Eric Gisse, 03:52
- Re: Why doesn't the electron fall on the proton in the L=0 states?, Tareq, 03:31
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Brad Guth, 03:20
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 34: Toward a Probability Drive, OsherD, 03:11
- It's a pain in the ass to tutor the clueless... _No_ fun at all., Jeff…Relf, 03:00
- Re: spectral density/Johnson noise, Bertromavich, 02:42
- Re: Net Neutrality, Schoenfeld, 02:35
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 02:27
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 33: Multiverse Works For Probability in a Sense, OsherD, 02:25
- Re: Paper: The Vacuum Energy Crisis, dda1, 02:11
- Re: Why we do not care., Vince, 02:10
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 02:10
- Re: FRED H, Roy L . Fuchs, 02:07
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 02:05
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 02:03
- Re: Why we do not care., R. Pierce Butler, 01:58
- Re: FRED H, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:58
- Re: FRED H, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:57
- Re: Net Neutrality, Bilge, 01:56
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 32: 3- vs 4-dimensional Bianchi and Confinement, OsherD, 01:54
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., R. Pierce Butler, 01:50
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 32: 3- vs 4-dimensional Bianchi and Confinement, OsherD, 01:50
- Re: FRED H, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:36
- Re: FRED H, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:33
- Re: FRED H, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:32
- Re: FRED H, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:29
- Re: FRED H, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:28
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:24
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:21
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:20
- Paper: The Vacuum Energy Crisis, Robert Karl Stonjek, 01:20
- Paper: Why the Cosmological Constant Is Small and Positive, Robert Karl Stonjek, 01:17
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:14
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:12
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:10
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Reverend Dave, 01:10
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:08
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Roy L . Fuchs, 01:03
- Atoms on the move, Bertromavich, 01:03
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 00:57
- Re: Net Neutrality, Schoenfeld, 00:38
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 00:36
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 00:28
- Re: spectral density/Johnson noise, Carlos Romero, 00:26
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, Timo Nieminen, 00:16
May 04, 2006
- Which Way Information For Dummies., Sum One Dumb, 23:38
- Re: Is platonism in math correct?, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:22
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Timo Nieminen, 23:20
- Re: plasma question, Allex Jones, 22:40
- Re: spectral density/Johnson noise, Allex Jones, 22:30
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 22:28
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 31: The Feedback-Nonfeedback Boundary and Initial-Terminal-Inside-Outside-Boundaries, Allex Jones, 22:26
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 21:55
- Re: THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION -- It's a Real Gasser..., Darkwing, 21:53
- Re: Calculating the Lorentz factor when v >= c, Eric Gisse, 21:51
- Re: Why we do not care., Vince, 21:40
- electron magnetic moment numbers from Feynman's QED book?, Jolly, 21:22
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 21:07
- Re: I need one _Big_ seller., tj Frazir, 20:57
- Re: plasma question, AverageDude, 20:49
- Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, tj Frazir, 20:45
- Re: I need one _Big_ seller., tj Frazir, 20:33
- Re: Time has two directions, brodix, 20:20
- Re: Net Neutrality, anyone . santos, 19:45
- Re: Why we do not care., Bob, 19:32
- Mystery Sand on Saturn Moon - Titan, Sam Wormley, 19:22
- THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION -- It's a Real Gasser..., Ed Conrad, 19:20
- Ice freezes at room temperature, Sam Wormley, 19:17
- Re: Why we do not care., Vince, 18:24
- Re: Time has two directions, Sam Wormley, 18:03
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, mmeron, 17:52
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 17:41
- Re: I did it!, T Wake, 17:40
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 17:39
- Re: I need one _Big_ seller., T Wake, 17:34
- Re: I did it!, PD, 17:34
- Re: I did it!, PD, 17:32
- Re: I did it!, PD, 17:30
- Re: I did it!, PD, 17:28
- Re: I need one _Big_ seller., jimp, 17:25
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Timo A. Nieminen, 17:24
- Re: I did it!, PD, 17:23
- Re: I did it!, PD, 17:21
- Re: Time has two directions, brodix, 17:07
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, John C . Polasek, 17:07
- Re: I did it!, T Wake, 17:05
- Re: I did it!, T Wake, 17:04
- Re: I need one _Big_ seller., Randy Poe, 16:59
- Re: Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., T Wake, 16:46
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 16:45
- Re: Money means nothing to me., T Wake, 16:43
- Re: 1.38 million KRW per MT of aluminum ingots, Cash_at_Your_Dock., T Wake, 16:40
- Re: T.J., I'm just getting started, going slow at first., T Wake, 16:38
- Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, T Wake, 16:36
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 16:34
- Re: T_Wake enjoys the wost tripe on Usenet, i.e. my posts., T Wake, 16:32
- Re: T_Wake enjoys the wost tripe on Usenet, i.e. my posts., T Wake, 16:32
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 16:22
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, tadchem, 16:19
- spectral density/Johnson noise, Carlos Romero, 16:09
- Re: Instantaneous axis of rotation?, Henning Makholm, 16:05
- Re: Net Neutrality, Rene Tschaggelar, 15:52
- Re: Work - impulse, Mike, 15:46
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 15:29
- Re: aligned galaxies, Hexenmeister, 15:15
- Re: Why I believe in Athiesm., Rene Tschaggelar, 15:14
- Re: Is platonism in math correct?, juanpool@xxxxxxxxx, 15:13
- Re: Work - impulse, briggs, 14:54
- plasma question, mkogan, 14:38
- Re: Time has two directions, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:58
- Re: Time has two directions, brodix, 13:53
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 13:49
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:42
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, JMA, 13:35
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:32
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Eli Kraisler, 13:22
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 13:20
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Sunny123, 13:18
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 13:13
- I need one _Big_ seller., Jeff…Relf, 13:12
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:03
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, srp, 12:58
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:53
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 12:35
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:35
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Thomas Smid, 12:31
- Re: T.J., I'm just getting started, going slow at first., tj Frazir, 12:29
- Re: T.J., I'm just getting started, going slow at first., tj Frazir, 12:27
- Re: Work - impulse, briggs, 12:26
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 12:25
- Re: T_Wake enjoys the wost tripe on Usenet, i.e. my posts., tj Frazir, 12:21
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 12:20
- Re: leSage gravity source?, ma1ibu, 12:00
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes' luna2, Randy Poe, 11:57
- Re: Net Neutrality, Jan Panteltje, 11:55
- Re: Schrödinger equation., Mirror Space, 11:52
- Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Nathan Urban, 11:52
- T.J., I'm just getting started, going slow at first., Jeff…Relf, 11:47
- Net Neutrality, Uncle Al, 11:39
- Re: Work - impulse, Mike, 11:35
- leSage gravity source?, ma1ibu, 11:20
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 11:14
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 11:12
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 11:10
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 11:05
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 11:04
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 10:50
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 10:47
- Re: Work - impulse, briggs, 10:39
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 10:26
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 10:18
- "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of, Eht, 10:17
- Re: Gravity, it's "energy source", and a bowling ball on a matress, Mike, 10:16
- Re: Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., Randy Poe, 10:13
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 10:11
- Re: I did it!, PD, 09:59
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 09:57
- Re: I did it!, greysky, 09:48
- Re: Work - impulse, Mike, 09:22
- Re: Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., Randy Poe, 09:16
- Re: you say your GOD is almighty?, Tony Orlow, 09:16
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes' luna2, Randy Poe, 09:11
- Re: Work - impulse, briggs, 09:10
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 09:03
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 08:50
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 08:46
- Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2), Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:45
- Re: you say your GOD is almighty?, RadicalLibertarian, 08:43
- Schrödinger equation., Sunny123, 08:41
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 08:41
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 08:26
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 08:18
- Re: Is platonism in math correct?, Fredrik Bulow, 08:11
- Re: Work - impulse, briggs, 08:02
- Re: Work - impulse, briggs, 07:53
- Re: Gravity, it's "energy source", and a bowling ball on a matress, Henning Makholm, 07:41
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Dik T. Winter, 07:22
- Money means nothing to me., Jeff…Relf, 07:10
- Re: Electric field Integration, Henning Makholm, 07:07
- Re: I did it!, Henning Makholm, 06:53
- Re: Why doesn't the electron fall on the proton in the L=0 states?, Henning Makholm, 06:48
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, jmfbahciv, 06:32
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Mike, 06:15
- Re: I did it!, Mike, 05:52
- Why doesn't the electron fall on the proton in the L=0 states?, Tareq, 05:47
- Re: I did it!, dedanoe, 05:36
- you say your GOD is almighty?, dedanoe, 05:33
- !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!THE BONE MARROW OF assignment::::::::::::FUNCTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS BÖRJESSON, 05:29
- Re: black hole vs. equilibrium point, dedanoe, 05:21
- T_Wake enjoys the wost tripe on Usenet, i.e. my posts., Jeff…Relf, 04:57
- Re: Is platonism in math correct?, will.harris@xxxxxxxxx, 03:53
- Re: Why we do not care., Martin Hogbin, 03:41
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 03:20
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 03:13
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 31: The Feedback-Nonfeedback Boundary and Initial-Terminal-Inside-Outside-Boundaries, donstockbauer, 03:09
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, FrediFizzx, 03:07
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 31: The Feedback-Nonfeedback Boundary and Initial-Terminal-Inside-Outside-Boundaries, OsherD, 02:59
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 02:52
- Re: I did it!, Mike, 02:39
- Re: Work - impulse, Mike, 02:35
- Really T.J., you're such a Luddite., Jeff…Relf, 02:05
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 02:00
- I did it!, osdfey, 01:26
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 01:24
- Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, tj Frazir, 00:23
- Re: 1.38 million KRW per MT of aluminum ingots, Cash_at_Your_Dock., tj Frazir, 00:09
May 03, 2006
- Re: Integration question, RadicalLibertarian, 23:59
- Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, tj Frazir, 23:56
- Re: 19 more offers. My follow-up to Jung_Min., tj Frazir, 23:49
- Re: Sober_Minded_Metaphysics, -- e.g. going beyond the Lambda_CDM m..., tj Frazir, 23:45
- Re: T.J., This moon thing of yours is a big ruse, not your _Real_ i..., tj Frazir, 23:40
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes' luna2, tj Frazir, 23:30
- Re: Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., tj Frazir, 23:28
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 23:12
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', mmeron, 23:08
- Reviews, Sam Wormley, 23:00
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 22:56
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Greg Hansen, 22:39
- WMAP data put cosmic inflation to the test, Sam Wormley, 22:37
- Polymers that conduct electricity are now of huge interest, Sam Wormley, 22:17
- Re: Integration question, RadicalLibertarian, 21:51
- Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2), Stolen_Humanity, 21:43
- Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Herb Martin, 21:17
- Re: Integration question, RadicalLibertarian, 21:15
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 21:01
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 21:01
- Re: Feed rats more, give them more drugs, they grow old quicker and die sooner., Eric Gisse, 20:56
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 20:43
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 20:41
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 20:12
- Re: Electric field Integration, Timo Nieminen, 19:59
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 19:57
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 19:43
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 19:38
- Electric field Integration, Nishu, 19:23
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 19:21
- Re: Work - impulse, Mike, 18:45
- Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2), Stolen_Humanity, 18:40
- Re: Work - impulse, Mike, 18:27
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 18:22
- Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Nathan Urban, 18:21
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 18:13
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 18:13
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 18:01
- aligned galaxies, ma1ibu, 18:00
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 30: Confinement (and Matter?) Generated By Bianchi Identity Violations, Fahad Alhasan, 17:52
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 17:40
- Re: Why I believe in Athiesm., Fahad Alhasan, 17:31
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 17:25
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 17:23
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 17:14
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 17:14
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 17:07
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 17:02
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 17:00
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 16:46
- Re: Work - impulse, Mike, 16:43
- Re: Is platonism in math correct?, Jan Burse, 16:43
- Re: Sober_Minded_Metaphysics, -- e.g. going beyond the Lambda_CDM model., T Wake, 16:36
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 16:34
- Re: T.J., This moon thing of yours is a big ruse, not your _Real_ issue., T Wake, 16:34
- Sober_Minded_Metaphysics, -- e.g. going beyond the Lambda_CDM model., Jeff…Relf, 16:21
- T.J., This moon thing of yours is a big ruse, not your _Real_ issue., Jeff…Relf, 16:11
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 16:10
- Re: Is platonism in math correct?, Ross A. Finlayson, 16:02
- Re: Is platonism in math correct?, sketch . system, 15:56
- Re: Feed rats more, give them more drugs, they grow old quicker and die sooner., T Wake, 15:41
- Re: T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, T Wake, 15:32
- Re: 1.38 million KRW per MT of aluminum ingots, Cash_at_Your_Dock., T Wake, 15:30
- Re: 19 more offers. My follow-up to Jung_Min., T Wake, 15:29
- Feed rats more, give them more drugs, they grow old quicker and die sooner., Jeff…Relf, 15:22
- Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Herb Martin, 14:55
- Re: It's a lifestyle choice., JEDIDIAH, 14:36
- Re: Time has two directions, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:10
- Re: Time has two directions, Sam Wormley, 13:54
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:41
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:33
- Re: Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics, ggdbr01, 13:30
- Re: A question about ergodicity., kjd_72, 13:28
- Re: Time has two directions, puppet_sock, 13:24
- Re: A question about ergodicity., puppet_sock, 13:21
- Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of, donstockbauer, 13:12
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 13:12
- Re: Integration question, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 13:02
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, srp, 12:56
- Re: Integration question, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 12:53
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:32
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes' luna2, Randy Poe, 12:22
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 12:18
- Re: Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., Randy Poe, 12:07
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes' luna2, Randy Poe, 12:04
- curses, kstocklmeir, 12:02
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 11:52
- Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2), Ken S. Tucker, 11:51
- Re: Work - impulse, Mike, 11:38
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', tj Frazir, 11:29
- curses, kstocklmeir, 11:25
- curses, kstocklmeir, 11:23
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', tj Frazir, 11:21
- curses, kstocklmeir, 11:17
- curses, kstocklmeir, 11:16
- Re: Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., tj Frazir, 11:09
- Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2), Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:18
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Barry,sl, 10:16
- Re: It's a lifestyle choice., John Bailo, 10:14
- Re: Work - impulse, joe_avery_2005, 10:13
- Re: Q Re light, Sam Wormley, 10:10
- Re: Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, PD, 10:06
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Randy Poe, 10:06
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Randy Poe, 10:03
- Why I believe in Athiesm., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:01
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 09:51
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, neo, 09:49
- Re: Q Re light, PD, 09:44
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 09:41
- Q Re light, Danny, 09:37
- A question about ergodicity., kjd_72, 09:35
- Re: Integration question, RadicalLibertarian, 09:34
- Re: It's a lifestyle choice., JEDIDIAH, 09:22
- Re: It's a lifestyle choice., JEDIDIAH, 09:19
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 09:01
- "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of, Eht, 08:54
- Re: Gravity, it's "energy source", and a bowling ball on a matress, CWatters, 08:44
- Re: Which way information is very, very simple., RadicalLibertarian, 08:41
- Re: Work - impulse, briggs, 08:20
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 08:16
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Bob, 06:52
- Re: Work - impulse, joe_avery_2005, 06:25
- Fiestaware dishes emit 20 millirad per hour., Jeff…Relf, 05:32
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', mmeron, 05:16
- Re: Thanks a lot, f_cker., Roy L . Fuchs, 05:13
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 05:06
- Re: Critical size (or Mass?) of the particle at which Macro transitions to Micro (Ref: Double Slit Experiment), Ravindra, 04:59
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 04:40
- Re: Gyroscope from 3 hard drives., Dave (from the UK), 03:42
- Re: A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, Mirror Space, 03:31
- Seeking diagramatic tensor notation tutorial or reference, Herb Martin, 03:30
- T.J., Are you still with me ? Should we take this to email ?, Jeff…Relf, 03:03
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 02:40
- Re: It's a Bird! It's a Plane! NO, It's yet another Conrad RETARDED post!, Roy L . Fuchs, 02:38
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, Richard Henry, 02:37
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 02:36
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Roy L . Fuchs, 02:36
- While gone for 3 days... 2800 posts. This group is lame., Roy L . Fuchs, 02:34
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Helmut Wabnig, 02:19
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, FrediFizzx, 01:57
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 30: Confinement (and Matter?) Generated By Bianchi Identity Violations, OsherD, 01:50
- Re: Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2), Ilja Schmelzer, 01:44
- 1.38 million KRW per MT of aluminum ingots, Cash_at_Your_Dock., Jeff…Relf, 01:39
- Isaac Newton - World Of Biography, Bits, 01:31
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 30: Confinement (and Matter?) Generated By Bianchi Identity Violations, OsherD, 01:27
- 19 more offers. My follow-up to Jung_Min., Jeff…Relf, 01:27
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 30: Confinement (and Matter?) Generated By Bianchi Identity Violations, OsherD, 01:12
May 02, 2006
- Re: A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, Ken S. Tucker, 23:52
- Re: Islamist-Like Disinformation Replies To My Nonrenormalization Thread, Fahad Alhasan, 23:47
- Re: Which way information is very, very simple., RadicalLibertarian, 23:44
- Re: Questions about absolute zero?, kumar, 23:31
- Gravity, it's "energy source", and a bowling ball on a matress, Mike Ruskai, 23:29
- Re: Universe in Flux: Constant of nature might have changed?, Eric Gisse, 23:27
- Re: Universe in Flux: Constant of nature might have changed?, Sam Wormley, 23:06
- Which way information is very, very simple., RadicalLibertarian, 22:55
- Re: A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, Ken S. Tucker, 22:53
- Re: rolling and sliding objects, Fredrik Bulow, 22:48
- Re: Questions about absolute zero?, AverageDude, 22:38
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 22:13
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 21:50
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Eric Gisse, 21:49
- Re: Universe in Flux: Constant of nature might have changed?, AverageDude, 21:47
- Re: Integration question, RadicalLibertarian, 21:47
- Time has two directions, brodix, 21:41
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 21:32
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 21:17
- Re: Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics, AverageDude, 21:17
- Re: Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2), grisly, 21:05
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 21:00
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, tadchem, 20:49
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 20:46
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 20:39
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 20:28
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Kadaitcha Man, 20:07
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 19:45
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 19:32
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 19:26
- Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics, ggdbr01, 19:23
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 19:06
- Re: Heat Transfer In Air, mrdarrett, 18:57
- Fermat's Last Theorem - Did It Discover Feedback?, OsherD, 18:51
- Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions, srp, 18:44
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 18:42
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, platopes, 18:38
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Barry,sl, 18:32
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Kadaitcha Man, 18:29
- Re: Islamist-Like Disinformation Replies To My Nonrenormalization Thread, OsherD, 18:28
- Re: A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, ma1ibu, 18:21
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Bob, 18:13
- Re: A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, FrediFizzx, 17:33
- Re: Islamist-Like Disinformation Replies To My Nonrenormalization Thread, vanep, 17:30
- Re: Work - impulse, Mike, 16:59
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 16:48
- Islamist-Like Disinformation Replies To My Nonrenormalization Thread, OsherD, 16:43
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, PD, 16:41
- Re: It's a lifestyle choice., Eric Gisse, 16:40
- Re: Work - impulse, briggs, 16:33
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 28: Trilinearity As Modified Linear PI Analog of GR Bianchi Identities, OsherD, 16:32
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, Timo A. Nieminen, 16:25
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 16:24
- Re: Work - impulse, mmeron, 16:16
- Re: It's a lifestyle choice., T Wake, 16:05
- Re: Work - impulse, briggs, 16:00
- It's a lifestyle choice., Jeff…Relf, 15:59
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 15:54
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 15:13
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, OG, 15:10
- Re: Automating Visual_Studio_2005 using the ATL., T Wake, 15:10
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 15:09
- Re: Attempting to automate Visual_Studio_2005, T Wake, 15:08
- Re: The adventure of physics - new version for free download, Sam Wormley, 15:03
- Re: Heat Transfer In Air, cnctut, 14:51
- Re: I'm just talented like that., John A. Bailo, 14:49
- Re: Gyroscope from 3 hard drives., Jason Stanidge, 14:43
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., T Wake, 14:42
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, OG, 14:31
- Re: The causalities are surely there... waiting to be discovered., T Wake, 14:29
- Re: High, dry next monday you better bust ass., T Wake, 14:24
- Re: Instantaneous Axis of Rotation, michaeld, 14:22
- I'm just talented like that., Jeff…Relf, 14:18
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, mmeron, 14:13
- Re: simultaniety(RE), kk, 14:12
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, William Mook, 14:05
- Re: rolling and sliding objects, katy, 14:04
- The adventure of physics - new version for free download, chri_schiller, 14:01
- Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2), Stolen_Humanity, 13:35
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 13:33
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 13:19
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 13:13
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, platopes, 13:04
- Re: Water is made to run uphill., platopes, 12:59
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 12:38
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, JMA, 12:11
- Re: simultaniety(RE), Dirk Van de moortel, 12:03
- Re: simultaniety(RE), PD, 11:55
- Re: simultaniety(RE), Dirk Van de moortel, 11:50
- Re: "The Einstein Hoax", donstockbauer, 11:27
- A New Electrodynamics of Hadrons!, Mirror Space, 10:58
- Re: simultaniety(RE), kk, 10:56
- Re: simultaniety(RE), kk, 10:50
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 10:33
- Re: Integration question, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 10:32
- Re: Integration question, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 10:21
- Re: Automating Visual_Studio_2005 using the ATL., John Bailo, 10:15
- Re: simultaniety(RE), PD, 09:51
- Re: simultaniety(RE), PD, 09:49
- Re: Ernest Rutherford Famouse biography of world, puppet_sock, 09:45
- Re: Integration question, RadicalLibertarian, 09:42
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 776 May 2, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 09:40
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, jimp, 09:35
- Re: Work - impulse, PD, 09:29
- "The Einstein Hoax", Eht, 09:05
- Automating Visual_Studio_2005 using the ATL., Jeff…Relf, 08:20
- Re: black hole vs. equilibrium point, donstockbauer, 07:46
- Re: Gyroscope from 3 hard drives., Rene Tschaggelar, 07:38
- Re: Instantaneous Axis of Rotation, ma1ibu, 07:32
- Re: Gyroscope from 3 hard drives., jmfbahciv, 07:27
- black hole vs. equilibrium point, dedanoe, 06:55
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Kadaitcha Man, 06:35
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Kadaitcha Man, 06:34
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, jmfbahciv, 06:23
- Re: Super strong neutron source started up, Jan Panteltje, 06:06
- Re: Water is made to run uphill., Jan Panteltje, 05:53
- Ernest Rutherford Famouse biography of world, Bits, 05:23
- Instantaneous Axis of Rotation, Edward Green, 04:48
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Lloyd Parker, 04:25
- Science & Technology Pilgrimage (Tour) of Europe $ USA, atul58@xxxxxxxxx, 04:00
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 29: Probabilistic Physics Underlies Geometry, OsherD, 02:56
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 28: Trilinearity As Modified Linear PI Analog of GR Bianchi Identities, vanep, 02:55
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 29: Probabilistic Physics Underlies Geometry, OsherD, 02:50
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 29: Probabilistic Physics Underlies Geometry, OsherD, 02:41
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Reverend Dave, 02:17
- Re: rolling and sliding objects, Fredrik Bulow, 02:10
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 28: Trilinearity As Modified Linear PI Analog of GR Bianchi Identities, OsherD, 02:08
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Reverend Dave, 01:55
- I just don't see the bait... it's not real to me., Jeff…Relf, 01:44
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 01:18
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 01:10
- The causalities are surely there... waiting to be discovered., Jeff…Relf, 01:09
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Apr 06 Washington, DC, mmeron, 00:33
- Re: 9V vs. car battery, gmarkowsky, 00:21
- Attempting to automate Visual_Studio_2005, Jeff…Relf, 00:21
May 01, 2006
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Apr 06 Washington, DC, Eric Gisse, 23:51
- Re: neutron steering?, Fahad Alhasan, 23:42
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Apr 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 23:39
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 23:23
- Re: Integration question, RadicalLibertarian, 22:49
- Re: Water is made to run uphill., mrdarrett, 22:47
- Re: Super strong neutron source started up, tj Frazir, 22:44
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Dik T. Winter, 22:38
- Re: Degrees of Freedom confusion, Fredrik Bulow, 22:35
- Re: 9V vs. car battery, AverageDude, 22:19
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Dik T. Winter, 22:16
- Re: Integration question, RadicalLibertarian, 21:59
- Re: Super strong neutron source started up, AverageDude, 21:55
- Re: Integrating a pi product, Peter Jay Salzman, 21:09
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 21:04
- Re: I hate selling shit... I'd rather go homeless., tj Frazir, 21:04
- Re: High, dry next monday you better bust ass., tj Frazir, 20:53
- Re: Cold Storage (OT?), Luc The Perverse, 20:41
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, platopes, 20:25
- Re: Water is made to run uphill., platopes, 20:22
- Re: maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, Kadaitcha Man, 20:18
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 20:16
- maitaining balance on bike in forward motion is easier than at rest, platopes, 19:55
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Apr 06 Washington, DC, mmeron, 19:51
- Re: FRED H, Kadaitcha Man, 19:50
- Re: neutron steering?, Greg Hansen, 19:41
- Re: FRED H, platopes, 19:41
- Re: Super strong neutron source started up, grisly, 19:39
- Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2), Greg Hansen, 19:33
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Apr 06 Washington, DC, carlip-nospam, 19:33
- Re: Degrees of Freedom confusion, Greg Hansen, 19:14
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event., rick_sobie, 19:10
- Re: rolling and sliding objects, CWatters, 19:06
- Re: neutron steering?, FrediFizzx, 19:05
- Re: Cold Storage (OT?), Ken Muldrew, 18:57
- rolling and sliding objects, katy, 18:48
- Re: High, dry and wondering why., T Wake, 18:41
- neutron steering?, jack, 18:39
- Re: FRED H, Kadaitcha Man, 18:09
- Re: High, dry and wondering why., tj Frazir, 17:47
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', T Wake, 17:47
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', T Wake, 17:46
- Re: Degrees of Freedom confusion, CWatters, 17:41
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', tj Frazir, 17:39
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', tj Frazir, 17:35
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', tj Frazir, 17:31
- Re: cross posting - finding average deviation, tadchem, 17:15
- Re: habshi demonstrates he is completely insane -- out of touch with reality. Wants to DIG a LAKE to dispose of rising oceans., mmeron, 17:08
- Re: Degrees of Freedom confusion, tadchem, 17:07
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Apr 06 Washington, DC, mmeron, 16:29
- Re: Work - impulse, mmeron, 16:27
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., george, 16:21
- Re: Feeling a little insecure ? !, EnlightenMe, 16:18
- Re: FRED H, platopes, 16:13
- Super strong neutron source started up, Jan Panteltje, 16:12
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 16:05
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Randy Poe, 16:03
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Randy Poe, 16:01
- Re: habshi demonstrates he is completely insane -- out of touch with reality. Wants to DIG a LAKE to dispose of rising oceans., me, 16:01
- Re: Eric_Gisse, Thanks for feeding my ego all the time., T Wake, 15:57
- Re: High, dry and wondering why., T Wake, 15:56
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Randy Poe, 15:54
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Bob, 15:39
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 15:38
- Re: 3.jpeg, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:37
- Re: What is a "peer" for peer review?, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:37
- Re: Integration question, Herman Rubin, 15:37
- Re: blue, green and red!, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:37
- Re: dedanoe's shocking device, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:37
- Re: Eric_Gisse, Thanks for feeding my ego all the time., The Ghost In The Machine, 15:37
- Re: Work - impulse, Greg Neill, 15:36
- Re: 9V vs. car battery, CWatters, 15:33
- Re: 9V vs. car battery, Greg Neill, 15:28
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Mike, 15:28
- Re: High, dry and wondering why., tj Frazir, 15:23
- Re: FRED H, Kadaitcha Man, 14:57
- Re: Work - impulse, srp, 14:49
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., platopes, 14:44
- Re: 9V vs. car battery, donstockbauer, 14:40
- Re: FRED H, platopes, 14:24
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes' luna2, tj Frazir, 14:20
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', T Wake, 14:18
- Re: 9V vs. car battery, cloudswrest, 14:14
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', tj Frazir, 14:06
- Re: High, dry and wondering why., T Wake, 14:05
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, Ken Muldrew, 14:05
- Re: It's no skin off my back., T Wake, 14:04
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., T Wake, 14:02
- Re: High, dry and wondering why., Randy Poe, 13:54
- Re: simultaniety(RE), Dirk Van de moortel, 13:53
- Re: Questions about absolute zero?, kumar, 13:49
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', tj Frazir, 13:47
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', tj Frazir, 13:45
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', tj Frazir, 13:45
- Re: simultaniety(RE), kk, 13:43
- Re: A fake arbitrage is something Governor Clinton would do., T Wake, 13:42
- Re: 9V vs. car battery, Prai Jei, 13:42
- Re: Why you believe in Athiesm., Reverend Dave, 13:40
- Re: It's no skin off my back., tj Frazir, 13:37
- Re: A fake arbitrage is something Governor Clinton would do., T Wake, 13:31
- Re: Degrees of Freedom ENGLISH for MORONS, tj Frazir, 13:29
- 9V vs. car battery, gmarkowsky, 13:19
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 28: Trilinearity As Modified Linear PI Analog of GR Bianchi Identities, Fahad Alhasan, 13:09
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 13:07
- Re: Water is made to run uphill., Mdmeenken, 13:00
- Re: Work - impulse, srp, 12:39
- Re: Degrees of Freedom confusion, CWatters, 12:37
- Re: US told to invest in particle physics, srp, 12:35
- Re: Degrees of Freedom confusion, CWatters, 12:32
- It's no skin off my back., Jeff…Relf, 12:07
- Re: Work - impulse, Mike, 11:59
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 11:54
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 11:46
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Randy Poe, 11:37
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Randy Poe, 11:35
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Randy Poe, 11:26
- Re: A fake arbitrage is something Governor Clinton would do., tj Frazir, 11:25
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Randy Poe, 11:24
- "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Eht, 11:22
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', tj Frazir, 11:05
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 10:51
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 10:45
- Re: simultaniety(RE), Dirk Van de moortel, 10:10
- Re: simultaniety(RE), kk, 10:04
- Re: simultaniety(RE), Dirk Van de moortel, 10:01
- Re: simultaniety(RE), kk, 09:56
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, jimp, 09:55
- Re: Work - impulse, Randy Poe, 09:53
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 08:54
- Re: Water is made to run uphill., nightbat, 08:48
- Re: Boltzmann equaton for swarming insects., Andy Resnick, 08:33
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 08:24
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 07:57
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Apr 06 Washington, DC, jmfbahciv, 07:47
- Re: Work - impulse, Peter, 07:37
- Re: Integration question, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:12
- Re: Integration question, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:07
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, OG, 06:42
- Re: Water is made to run uphill., Jan Panteltje, 06:25
- Re: Heat Transfer In Air, Tony, 06:10
- Re: Water is made to run uphill., Jan Panteltje, 06:02
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, jmfbahciv, 06:01
- Re: Why can't human statue stand?, jmfbahciv, 05:59
- Re: Degrees of Freedom confusion, tadchem, 05:53
- Re: Galvanic currents..., Jan Panteltje, 05:49
- Re: Heat Transfer In Air, Jan Panteltje, 05:47
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 01, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:43
- Re: Water is made to run uphill., tadchem, 05:36
- Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes', Brad Guth, 05:27
- A fake arbitrage is something Governor Clinton would do., Jeff…Relf, 04:51
- Re: FRED H, Kadaitcha Man, 04:30
- Re: FRED H, platopes, 04:11
- Re: Questions about absolute zero?, kumar, 04:06
- Re: Can we propel a body with very small upward velocity?, Brad Guth, 03:56
- Re: FRED H, Kadaitcha Man, 03:51
- Re