sci.physics (thread)

Physics of Pool (Billiards), Mastadex, 2006/02/28
- Re: Physics of Pool (Billiards), Randy Poe, 2006/02/28
- Re: Physics of Pool (Billiards), Sam Wormley, 2006/02/28
Re: Fw: Liberals See 'Roe v Wade' Going *BYE-BYE* `, Day Brown, 2006/02/28
Short, cute problem, PD, 2006/02/28
- Re: Short, cute problem, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/28
- Re: Short, cute problem, Chumly HT, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Short, cute problem, richard miller, 2006/02/28
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 767 February 28, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/28
Father of ISS Publishes Structure of the Atomic Nucleus, Millennium, 2006/02/28
X -> LOG|X|, NILS BÖRJESSON, 2006/02/28
Blocked sender list for sci.physics ?, Chumly HT, 2006/02/28
- Re: Blocked sender list for sci.physics ?, donstockbauer, 2006/02/28
- Re: Blocked sender list for sci.physics ?, T Wake, 2006/02/28
"Retic Postings and SPAM", Erops, 2006/02/28
Absolute/relative space as opposed to Copernican heliocentricity, oriel36, 2006/02/28
- Re: Absolute/relative space as opposed to Copernican heliocentricity, Mike, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Absolute/relative space as opposed to Copernican heliocentricity, oriel36, 2006/02/28
- Re: Absolute/relative space as opposed to Copernican heliocentricity, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Absolute/relative space as opposed to Copernican heliocentricity, oriel36, 2006/02/28
    - Re: Absolute/relative space as opposed to Copernican heliocentricity, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/28
wow that's the best solution ever -- regarding dedanoe's SPONGE, dedanoe, 2006/02/28
- Re: wow that's the best solution ever -- regarding dedanoe's SPONGE, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/28
  - Re: wow that's the best solution ever -- regarding dedanoe's SPONGE, dedanoe, 2006/02/28
Re: A theory of everything that _Matters_., T Wake, 2006/02/28
- Re: A theory of everything that _Matters_., donstockbauer, 2006/02/28
Conservation of momentum -specific case, Wiredchop, 2006/02/28
- Re: Conservation of momentum -specific case, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Conservation of momentum -specific case, Wiredchop, 2006/02/28
- Re: Conservation of momentum -specific case, Randy Poe, 2006/02/28
- Re: Conservation of momentum -specific case, Spaceman, 2006/02/28
Re: is there a "theoretical" mass for a photon ???, brian a m stuckless, 2006/02/28
the etiomology of the word "washer", a_plutonium, 2006/02/28
- Re: the etiomology of the word "washer", SCW, 2006/02/28
  - Re: the etiomology of the word "washer", donstockbauer, 2006/02/28
- Re: the etiomology of the word "washer", Robert Low, 2006/02/28
Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 3: Linked Logistic Probable Influence Is Non-Decreasing in Time, OsherD, 2006/02/28
- Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 3: Linked Logistic Probable Influence Is Non-Decreasing in Time, OsherD, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 3: Linked Logistic Probable Influence Is Non-Decreasing in Time, OsherD, 2006/02/28
Least square fitting, carlos . james . r, 2006/02/28
- Re: Least square fitting, tadchem, 2006/02/28
Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 2: Quantum/Macroscopic Erasure, OsherD, 2006/02/27
- Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 2: Quantum/Macroscopic Erasure, OsherD, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 2: Quantum/Macroscopic Erasure, OsherD, 2006/02/28
Quantum entanglement, mike3, 2006/02/27
- Re: Quantum entanglement, Greysky, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Quantum entanglement, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Quantum entanglement, Y.Porat, 2006/02/28
Space Tourism Wiki Encyclopedia 'Reach for the Stars' Contest, www.NewVoyageNews.com, 2006/02/27
differential equations for the proton, neutron and electron relationship, Jack, 2006/02/27
- Re: differential equations for the proton, neutron and electron relationship, Igor, 2006/02/28
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 27 February 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
silly particle question?, Neil W, 2006/02/27
- Re: silly particle question?, RP, 2006/02/27
- Re: silly particle question?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
  - Re: silly particle question?, RP, 2006/02/27
    - Re: silly particle question?, RP, 2006/02/27
    - Re: silly particle question? BUSTED, tj Frazir, 2006/02/27
Where do the sane post?, alextangent, 2006/02/27
- Re: Where do the sane post?, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/27
- Re: Where do the sane post?, BD, 2006/02/27
- Re: Where do the sane post?, cnctut, 2006/02/27
- Re: Where do the sane post?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/27
- Re: Where do the sane post?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Where do the sane post?, Bruce Scott TOK, 2006/02/28
- Re: Where do the sane post?, Edward Green, 2006/02/28
- Re: Where do the sane post?, Edward Green, 2006/02/28
- Re: Where do the sane post?, SCW, 2006/02/28
- Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, alextangent, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, SCW, 2006/02/28
    - Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, Traveler, 2006/02/28
    - Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, alextangent, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, Traveler, 2006/02/28
    - Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, SCW, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, Traveler, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, alextangent, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, Traveler, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, Traveler, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, SCW, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, Traveler, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, SCW, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, Traveler, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, SCW, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics, Traveler, 2006/02/28
- Re: Where do the sane post?, srp, 2006/02/28
- Re: Where do the sane post?, Bruce Scott TOK, 2006/02/28
average acceleration, Don1, 2006/02/27
- Re: average acceleration, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/02/27
  - Re: average acceleration, SCW, 2006/02/28
  - Re: average acceleration, amerwe, 2006/02/28
- Re: average acceleration, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
  - Re: average acceleration, tadchem, 2006/02/27
- Re: average acceleration, odin, 2006/02/27
- Re: average acceleration, Vanilla, 2006/02/28
- Re: average acceleration, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/28
Some Simple Optical Questions, Robert11, 2006/02/27
- Re: Some Simple Optical Questions, John Popelish, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Some Simple Optical Questions, Zulayman, 2006/02/27
- Re: Some Simple Optical Questions, BD, 2006/02/27
- Re: Some Simple Optical Questions, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/27
- Re: Some Simple Optical Questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals, OsherD, 2006/02/27
- Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals, OsherD, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals, OsherD, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals, OsherD, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals, Jahulamed, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals, OsherD, 2006/02/27
Interesting physics, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/27
- Re: Interesting physics, T Wake, 2006/02/27
- Re: Interesting physics, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
WHY IS THIS CONSTANT IN MKSA SO CLOSE TO ONE?, NILS BÖRJESSON, 2006/02/27
- Re: WHY IS THIS CONSTANT IN MKSA SO CLOSE TO ONE?, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/27
  - Re: WHY IS THIS CONSTANT IN MKSA SO CLOSE TO ONE?, FrediFizzx, 2006/02/27
- Re: WHY IS THIS CONSTANT IN MKSA SO CLOSE TO ONE?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???BUSTED, tj Frazir, 2006/02/27
- Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???BUSTED, T Wake, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???BUSTED, tj Frazir, 2006/02/27
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Erops, 2006/02/27
I love Sir John-Paul Turcaud, donstockbauer, 2006/02/27
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, February 27, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2006/02/27
new moments about dedanoe's SPONGE comprexpander, dedanoe, 2006/02/27
what is state of inner balance?, dedanoe, 2006/02/27
OT The Art, julianlzb87, 2006/02/27
Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 4: Exponentials in and out of Cosmology, OsherD, 2006/02/27
The Lorenz transformation, Chris, 2006/02/27
- Re: The Lorenz transformation, Bilge, 2006/02/27
  - Re: The Lorenz transformation, JanPB, 2006/02/27
  - Re: The Lorenz transformation, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/27
- Re: The Lorenz transformation, Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/27
  - Re: The Lorenz transformation, Chris, 2006/02/28
- Re: The Lorenz transformation, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/27
  - Re: The Lorenz transformation, Sue..., 2006/02/27
Last Call for Papers: CSC'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06), A. M. G. Solo, 2006/02/26
- Re: Last Call for Papers: CSC'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06), newanatolia56, 2006/02/27
All Is Revealed to Electrodynamic Blue Star, Global Consciousness, yonibluestar, 2006/02/26
electrolysis, virtualadepts, 2006/02/26
- Re: electrolysis, cnctut, 2006/02/26
  - Re: electrolysis, cnctut, 2006/02/26
- Re: electrolysis, Pipi, 2006/02/26
  - Re: electrolysis, virtualadepts, 2006/02/27
Relativity and You, Bishop, 2006/02/26
- Re: Relativity and You, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
- Re: Relativity and You, Spaceman, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Relativity and You, Bishop, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Relativity and You, Spaceman, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Relativity and You, Randy Poe, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Relativity and You, T Wake, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity and You, Spaceman, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity and You, T Wake, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity and You, Spaceman, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity and You, T Wake, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Relativity and You, T Wake, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Relativity and You, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Relativity and You, T Wake, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Relativity and You, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
- Re: Relativity and You, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/27
- Re: Relativity and You, Paul Cardinale, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Relativity and You, Randy Poe, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Relativity and You, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Relativity and You, T Wake, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Relativity and You, Bishop, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Relativity and You, T Wake, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity and You, Bishop, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity and You, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity and You, Bishop, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity and You, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity and You, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/27
- Re: Relativity and You, avergon, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Relativity and You, Bishop, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Relativity and You, JanPB, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Relativity and You, avergon, 2006/02/28
Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 3: Linked Logistic System and Exponential Subcases, OsherD, 2006/02/26
- Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 3: Linked Logistic System and Exponential Subcases, Pipi, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 3: Linked Logistic System and Exponential Subcases, OsherD, 2006/02/27
Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, desertphile, 2006/02/26
- Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, digitalmaster, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, desertphile, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, desertphile, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Goedjn, 2006/02/27
- Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, SJF, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, hallerb@xxxxxxx, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, desertphile, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, desertphile, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Jerry Avins, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, SJF, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, mm, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Jerry Avins, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Harry K, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, SJF, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Harry K, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Jerry Avins, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Jerry Avins, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Spaceman, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Jerry Avins, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Guy King, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Jerry Avins, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Nick, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Greg Neill, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Jerry Avins, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Harry K, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, SJF, 2006/02/27
- Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, John Rumm, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, desertphile, 2006/02/26
- Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Cameron Dorrough, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, desertphile, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Harry K, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Harry K, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, mm, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Jerry Avins, 2006/02/26
- Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Jerry Avins, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, desertphile, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, fred, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Jerry Avins, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Harry K, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, fred, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, George E. Cawthon, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, fred, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Harry K, 2006/02/28
- Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, zxcvbob, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, desertphile, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, hallerb@xxxxxxx, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, desertphile, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Jerry Avins, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, ben . aust, 2006/02/26
- Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, digitalmaster, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Doctor Drivel, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Jerry Avins, 2006/02/27
- Re: Water head, pressure, pipe diameter, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/27
Relativity in Everyday Life, Bishop, 2006/02/26
- Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bishop, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bishop, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
      
      M sense of tyhe term.Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: M sense of tyhe term.Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bishop, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: M sense of tyhe term.Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bishop, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: M sense of tyhe term.Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: M sense of tyhe term.Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: M sense of tyhe term.Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: M sense of tyhe term.Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/27
- Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, xxein, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bishop, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, SCW, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, donstockbauer, 2006/02/27
- Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bishop, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bishop, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, hanson, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bishop, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/28
    - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bilge, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bilge, 2006/02/27
- Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bishop, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/27
- Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bishop, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
- Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Paul Cardinale, 2006/02/27
- Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Bilge, 2006/02/27
- Re: Relativity in Everyday Life, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
Solar Cell Cooling?, Alexander Thesoso, 2006/02/26
- Re: Solar Cell Cooling?, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Solar Cell Cooling?, Alexander Thesoso, 2006/02/27
Galaxy Energy Theory~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~, granite stone, 2006/02/26
- Re: Galaxy Energy Theory~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~, ma1ibu, 2006/02/26
- Re: Galaxy Energy Theory~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
A silly problem with the constant speed of light., Spaceman, 2006/02/26
- Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light., RP, 2006/02/26
  - Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light., Spaceman, 2006/02/26
    - Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light., RP, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light., Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light., RP, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light., Spaceman, 2006/02/26
- Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light., OG, 2006/02/26
  - Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light., Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/26
thermal photons, Sir Frederick, 2006/02/26
- Re: thermal photons, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
  - Re: thermal photons, Sir Frederick, 2006/02/26
    - Re: thermal photons, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: thermal photons, Sir Frederick, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: thermal photons, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: thermal photons, PD, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: thermal photons, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/27
    - Re: thermal photons, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: thermal photons, Sir Frederick, 2006/02/26
- Re: thermal photons, tadchem, 2006/02/26
- Re: thermal photons, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/27
  - Re: thermal photons, brian a m stuckless, 2006/02/27
    - Re: thermal photons, brian a m stuckless, 2006/02/27
THE MASS OF THE ELECTRON AND THE MASS OF THE PROTON CALCULATED!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS BÖRJESSON, 2006/02/26
Re: GENERALIZATION OF MAXWELL's EQUATIONS OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD!!!!!!!!!, srp, 2006/02/26
"A Snapshot of a Photon", Etis, 2006/02/26
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon", Chris, 2006/02/27
GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE, ACE, 2006/02/26
- Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE, donstockbauer, 2006/02/26
  - Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE, uri, 2006/02/26
    - Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE, Darkwing, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE, uri, 2006/02/28
What is a "nuclear flame"?, Radium, 2006/02/26
- Re: What is a "nuclear flame"?, Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/26
- Re: What is a "nuclear flame"?, handoffsid, 2006/02/26
  - Re: What is a "nuclear flame"?, donstockbauer, 2006/02/26
- Re: What is a "nuclear flame"?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/27
Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 2: Don't Delete Incoming Data From Infinity, OsherD, 2006/02/26
- Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 2: Don't Delete Incoming Data From Infinity, OsherD, 2006/02/26
- Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 2: Don't Delete Incoming Data From Infinity, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 2: Don't Delete Incoming Data From Infinity, OsherD, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 2: Don't Delete Incoming Data From Infinity, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/27
Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
- Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, donstockbauer, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
- Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
- Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, tdp1001, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/27
- Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/27
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Earle Jones, 2006/02/26
do you want some information on your online studies?, gastrofil, 2006/02/26
Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation, OsherD, 2006/02/25
- Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation, OsherD, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation, OsherD, 2006/02/25
Moleculer Interactions?, kumar, 2006/02/25
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 18: HUP is at most Perceptual, OsherD, 2006/02/25
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 18: HUP is at most Perceptual, OsherD, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 18: HUP is at most Perceptual, OsherD, 2006/02/25
    - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 18: HUP is at most Perceptual, OsherD, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 18: HUP is at most Perceptual, donstockbauer, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 18: HUP is at most Perceptual, OsherD, 2006/02/25
ROCK OF AGES -- Ed Conrad Battles Science in 25-Year Quest for Truth, Ed Conrad, 2006/02/25
Re: I think they could use me in Beijing to clean up the code., tj Frazir, 2006/02/25
- Re: I think they could use me in Beijing to clean up the code., T Wake, 2006/02/25
- Some Asians have certain prejudices., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Some Asians have certain prejudices., tj Frazir, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Some Asians have certain prejudices., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Some Asians have certain prejudices., tj Frazir, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Some Asians have certain prejudices., T Wake, 2006/02/26
    - T.J., you see wild things that simply aren't there., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T.J., you see wild things that simply aren't there., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Einstein smoked tobacco. No one is more sober than a tobacco smoker., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Einstein smoked tobacco. No one is more sober than a tobacco smoker., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T.J., you see wild things that simply aren't there., tj Frazir, 2006/02/26
      
      T.J., you sound _Exactly_ like one of those Nigerian scammers., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T.J., you sound _Exactly_ like one of those Nigerian scammers., tj Frazir, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: T.J., you sound _Exactly_ like one of those Nigerian scammers., tj Frazir, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: T.J., you see wild things that simply aren't there., T Wake, 2006/02/27
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 17: Partial Circle Paradox, OsherD, 2006/02/25
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 17: Partial Circle Paradox, OsherD, 2006/02/25
how profound dedanoe!!, dedanoe, 2006/02/25
Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists, MobyDikc, 2006/02/25
- Re: Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists, MobyDikc, 2006/02/25
    - Re: Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists, MobyDikc, 2006/02/25
finding the particle, photonics, 2006/02/25
- Re: finding the particle, Peter, 2006/02/26
- Re: finding the particle, srp, 2006/02/26
abort, retry, ignore, fail?, dedanoe, 2006/02/25
Article: On Cosmic Magnetic Fields, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2006/02/25
- Re: Article: On Cosmic Magnetic Fields, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Article: On Cosmic Magnetic Fields, ma1ibu, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Article: On Cosmic Magnetic Fields, ma1ibu, 2006/02/26
condensator, Chrisd5000rouge, 2006/02/25
- Re: condensator, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/25
Re: Why is pressure tensor in hydrodynamics purely dissipative?, Edward Green, 2006/02/25
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 16: Power Laws vs sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2), OsherD, 2006/02/25
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 16: Power Laws vs sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2), OsherD, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 16: Power Laws vs sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2), OsherD, 2006/02/25
Question for Ken Seto, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
- Re: Question for Ken Seto, Paul Cardinale, 2006/02/25
A New Style Nuclear Trigger, handoffsid, 2006/02/25
- Re: A New Style Nuclear Trigger, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/25
- Re: A New Style Nuclear Trigger, tj Frazir, 2006/02/25
  - Re: A New Style Nuclear Trigger, handoffsid, 2006/02/26
    - Re: A New Style Nuclear Trigger, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/26
Is the Pope a Catholic?, Dougal McDougal of that Elk, 2006/02/25
- Re: Is the Pope a Catholic?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/25
Instantaneous acceleration, Don1, 2006/02/25
- Re: Instantaneous acceleration, donstockbauer, 2006/02/25
- Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Instantaneous acceleration, ma1ibu, 2006/02/25
    - Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Traveler, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, bill, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, SCW, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Traveler, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, SCW, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Traveler, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Instantaneous acceleration, PD, 2006/02/27
    - Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Tony Orlow, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, PD, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Tony Orlow, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Tony Orlow, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, SCW, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Randy Poe, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Tony Orlow, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Randy Poe, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Tony Orlow, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Virgil, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/27
- Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Paul Cardinale, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
- Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Robert Low, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Instantaneous acceleration, tadchem, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Don1, 2006/02/26
- Re: Instantaneous acceleration, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
- Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Randy Poe, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Don1, 2006/02/25
- Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Mr Clarke, 2006/02/25
- Re: Instantaneous acceleration-, JEMebius, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Instantaneous acceleration-, Richard Henry, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Instantaneous acceleration-, tadchem, 2006/02/26
- Re: Instantaneous acceleration, SCW, 2006/02/27
- Re: Instantaneous acceleration, PD, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Instantaneous acceleration, Traveler, 2006/02/27
Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/25
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, mmeron, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/25
    - Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, mmeron, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Mike, 2006/02/25
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/02/25
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/02/25
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, matt271829-news, 2006/02/25
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/25
    - Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, matt271829-news, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, matt271829-news, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, matt271829-news, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, matt271829-news, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, matt271829-news, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, matt271829-news, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/26
physics 2000, Mike H., 2006/02/25
- Re: physics 2000, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
  - Re: physics 2000, Mike H., 2006/02/25
    - Re: physics 2000, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: physics 2000, Mike H., 2006/02/25
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 15: Holographic Principle, OsherD, 2006/02/25
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 15: Holographic Principle, OsherD, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 15: Holographic Principle, OsherD, 2006/02/25
Standard Model electron orbitals vs Smart Model no electron orbitals, S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/25
The Galois Story, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
- Re: The Galois Story, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/25
  - Re: The Galois Story, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
    - Re: The Galois Story, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/25
Easy Answers: Quantum computer gives results without running, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
- Re: Easy Answers: Quantum computer gives results without running, handoffsid, 2006/02/25
Re: I have connections up the yang, both legal and otherwise., tj Frazir, 2006/02/24
- Re: I have connections up the yang, both legal and otherwise., T Wake, 2006/02/25
- How can you pilot a ship when all you see is phantom objects ? !, Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
  - Re: How can you pilot a ship when all you see is phantom objects ? !, T Wake, 2006/02/25
Physics of aerial skiing tricks, matt271829-news, 2006/02/24
- Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks, CWatters, 2006/02/25
- Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks, Edward Green, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks, matt271829-news, 2006/02/25
    - Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks, Edward Green, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks, matt271829-news, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks, matt271829-news, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks, tj Frazir, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks, Edward Green, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks, matt271829-news, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks, tj Frazir, 2006/02/27
Entropy of a ng thread, SCW, 2006/02/24
- Re: Entropy of a ng thread, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/24
- Re: Entropy of a ng thread, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Entropy of a ng thread, tdp1001, 2006/02/25
- Message not available
  - Re: Entropy of a ng thread, Edward Green, 2006/02/25
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Feb 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/24
Michelson - Morley experiment, Eugeniusz, 2006/02/24
- Re: Michelson - Morley experiment, Eugeniusz, 2006/02/24
Re: THE USA AWARE OF THE HUGE DEEP SEA GOLD PLACERS SINCE OVER 50 Y..., tj Frazir, 2006/02/24
- Re: THE USA AWARE OF THE HUGE DEEP SEA GOLD PLACERS SINCE OVER 50Y..., hanson, 2006/02/24
- Re: THE USA AWARE OF THE HUGE DEEP SEA GOLD PLACERS SINCE OVER 50 Y..., tj Frazir, 2006/02/24
Physicists learn how to "teleclone", Sam Wormley, 2006/02/24
- Re: Physicists learn how to "teleclone", Spaceman, 2006/02/24
the "forces" behind light?, shoemakerted@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/24
- Re: the "forces" behind light?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/24
  - Re: the "forces" behind light?, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
- Re: the "forces" behind light?, SCW, 2006/02/24
  - Message not available
    - Re: the "forces" behind light?, SCW, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: the "forces" behind light?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: the "forces" behind light?, tj Frazir, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: the "forces" behind light?, tj Frazir, 2006/02/24
- Re: the "forces" behind light?, srp, 2006/02/24
- Re: the "forces" behind light?, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/24
- Re: the "forces" behind light?, PD, 2006/02/24
- Re: the "forces" behind light?, tdp1001, 2006/02/25
  - Re: the "forces" behind light?, shoemakerted@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/26
    - Re: the "forces" behind light?, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
"The Source of Gravitational Energy", Etis, 2006/02/24
Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/24
- Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Igor, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Igor, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Igor, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Randy Poe, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Igor, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Peter, 2006/02/25
- Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
Hearing, Anis, 2006/02/24
- Re: Hearing, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
- Re: Hearing, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/24
Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, Kylie, 2006/02/24
- Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, Nicholas Sherlock, 2006/02/24
- Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, tadchem, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, Kylie, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, CWatters, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, Mike Yarwood, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, Tony, 2006/02/24
  - Message not available
    - Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, dcshead, 2006/02/24
- Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, srp, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, Mike, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, srp, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, CWatters, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, Mike, 2006/02/25
- Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, PD, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, tadchem, 2006/02/24
- Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, OG, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, OG, 2006/02/24
- Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, Kylie, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, Mike Yarwood, 2006/02/25
- Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, Jasen Betts, 2006/02/25
- Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, arvee, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Acceleraton and Deceleration Problem, CWatters, 2006/02/25
Invitation To Goldlynks Club And Enrich Yourself @ www.cashcards.net/rep/76574, wilson_20004, 2006/02/24
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 14: Universal Constant Paradoxes, OsherD, 2006/02/24
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 14: Universal Constant Paradoxes, OsherD, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 14: Universal Constant Paradoxes, Caught You, 2006/02/24
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 14: Universal Constant Paradoxes, Caught You, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 14: Universal Constant Paradoxes, OsherD, 2006/02/25
Re: GOLD SCARCITY, platopes, 2006/02/24
PRACTICE MAKES PERFECT (for the Evolutionists), Ed Conrad, 2006/02/24
Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, mwmiller314, 2006/02/24
- Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, Tony, 2006/02/26
- Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, tadchem, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, mwmiller314, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, tadchem, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, mwmiller314, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, tadchem, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, mwmiller314, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, mwmiller314, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, mwmiller314, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, tadchem, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, mwmiller314, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, mwmiller314, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, mwmiller314, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, tdp1001, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal, tadchem, 2006/02/26
radio control of remote devices from pc, mwmiller314, 2006/02/24
- Re: radio control of remote devices from pc, CWatters, 2006/02/24
  - Re: radio control of remote devices from pc, mwmiller314, 2006/02/24
Re: HAMMOND CONFIRMS 100k BC OMPHALOS-CREATION, George Hammond, 2006/02/23
Entanglement heats up, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/23
- Re: Entanglement heats up, Greysky, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Entanglement heats up, Y.Porat, 2006/02/24
- Re: Entanglement heats up, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/24
- Re: Entanglement heats up, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/02/24
Re: Why are Asians so good at math?, tj Frazir, 2006/02/23
- Re: Why are Asians so good at math?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Why are Asians so good at math?, tj Frazir, 2006/02/25
    - Re: Why are Asians so good at math?, T Wake, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Why are Asians so good at math?, tj Frazir, 2006/02/25
    - Re: Why are Asians so good at math?, T Wake, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Why are Asians so good at math?, tj Frazir, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Why are Asians so good at math?, tj Frazir, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Why are Asians so good at math?, Chris, 2006/02/26
- Re: Why are Asians so good at math?, tj Frazir, 2006/02/23
- Re: Why are Asians so good at math?, tj Frazir, 2006/02/24
- Re: Why are Asians so good at math?, tj Frazir, 2006/02/25
Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
- Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/25
- Re: Question for OG, Bob Cain, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Question for OG, THE_ONE, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Question for OG, Greg Neill, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Question for OG, T Wake, 2006/02/24
Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes., ma1ibu, 2006/02/23
- Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes., Sam Wormley, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes., ma1ibu, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes., Sam Wormley, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes., ma1ibu, 2006/02/23
- Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes., tadchem, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes., ma1ibu, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes., ma1ibu, 2006/02/24
question about atoms, MobyDikc, 2006/02/23
- Re: question about atoms, srp, 2006/02/23
  - Re: question about atoms, Doune, 2006/02/23
    - Re: question about atoms, srp, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: question about atoms, Y.Porat, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: question about atoms, Doune, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: question about atoms, Y.Porat, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: question about atoms, Doune, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: question about atoms, Y.Porat, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: question about atoms, Doune, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: question about atoms, maporat, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: question about atoms, Wouter van Marle, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: question about atoms, tadchem, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: question about atoms, Wouter van Marle, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: question about atoms, tadchem, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: question about atoms, Lloyd Parker, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: question about atoms, Solvay, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: question about atoms, Solvay, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: question about atoms, Y.Porat, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: question about atoms, Solvay, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: question about atoms, maporat, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: question about atoms, maporat, 2006/02/27
- Re: question about atoms, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/23
  - Re: question about atoms, Doune, 2006/02/23
- Re: question about atoms, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/23
- Re: question about atoms, tadchem, 2006/02/24
- Re: question about atoms, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/24
  - Re: question about atoms, kdthrge, 2006/02/25
    - Re: question about atoms, tadchem, 2006/02/25
- Re: question about atoms, andrewvecsey@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/26
  - Re: question about atoms, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/02/26
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 2006/02/23
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis, Dr.Chumly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 2006/02/24
New Electricity, Chris, 2006/02/23
- Re: New Electricity, Doune, 2006/02/23
Re: The Structure of God's Mind, science, 2006/02/23
- Re: The Structure of God's Mind, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
- Re: The Structure of God's Mind, science, 2006/02/23
Re: Doppler Space Time Mind of God, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/23
Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy., tj Frazir, 2006/02/23
- Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy., Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy., tj Frazir, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy., T Wake, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy., tj Frazir, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy., tj Frazir, 2006/02/25
"The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Etis, 2006/02/23
the new looks of dedanoe's nukebook, dedanoe, 2006/02/23
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Waldo, 2006/02/23
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 2006/02/26
  - Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Lloyd Parker, 2006/02/27
How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?, playa7383, 2006/02/23
- Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?, thoovler, 2006/02/23
  - Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/23
- Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?, tomgee, 2006/02/24
  - Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
  - Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/24
    - Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
- Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?, RP, 2006/02/24
- Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/02/24
Re: went for job interview, tj Frazir, 2006/02/22
- Re: went for job interview, tj Frazir, 2006/02/23
USB Live System Requirements, mwmiller314, 2006/02/22
- Re: USB Live System Requirements, Rene Tschaggelar, 2006/02/23
- Re: USB Live System Requirements, CWatters, 2006/02/23
  - Re: USB Live System Requirements, mwmiller314, 2006/02/23
    - Re: USB Live System Requirements, CWatters, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: USB Live System Requirements, mwmiller314, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: USB Live System Requirements, CWatters, 2006/02/24
Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism", tdp1001, 2006/02/22
- Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism", hanson, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism", tdp1001, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism", hanson, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism", Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism", hanson, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism", tdp1001, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism", hanson, 2006/02/26
  - Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism", tdp1001, 2006/02/26
    - Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism", hanson, 2006/02/27
wavelength detector moving towards lightsource, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
- Re: wavelength detector moving towards lightsource, Paul Cardinale, 2006/02/22
- Re: wavelength detector moving towards lightsource, Dr Physics, 2006/02/22
Re: Liberals are a Republican's best friend, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/22
Life inside the case of a fragile guitar....., sunsite, 2006/02/22
- Re: Life inside the case of a fragile guitar....., Dr Physics, 2006/02/23
- Re: Life inside the case of a fragile guitar....., CWatters, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Life inside the case of a fragile guitar....., CWatters, 2006/02/23
- Re: Life inside the case of a fragile guitar....., Andy Resnick, 2006/02/23
- Re: Life inside the case of a fragile guitar....., Tony, 2006/02/23
Re: Scientists Bewildered By Fine Tuned Design Of The Universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/22
- Re: Scientists Bewildered By Fine Tuned Design Of The Universe, PD, 2006/02/23
Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!, rander3127, 2006/02/22
- Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!, tadchem, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/22
    - Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!, Useful, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!, CWatters, 2006/02/23
- Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!, Doune, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!, CWatters, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!, Doune, 2006/02/23
Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, Volker Hetzer, 2006/02/22
- Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, PD, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, Volker Hetzer, 2006/02/24
    - Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, PD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, Volker Hetzer, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, PD, 2006/02/25
  - Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, Volker Hetzer, 2006/02/24
- Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, Volker Hetzer, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, PD, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, Volker Hetzer, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, PD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, Volker Hetzer, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution, PD, 2006/02/25
young's double slit, (-Peter-), 2006/02/22
- Re: young's double slit, OG, 2006/02/22
  - Re: young's double slit, (-Peter-), 2006/02/22
    - Re: young's double slit, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/22
- Re: young's double slit, PD, 2006/02/22
- Re: young's double slit, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/22
Particles_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, hanson, 2006/02/22
Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Igor, 2006/02/22
Free Lunch on Ed Conrad: A SPAM SANDWICH, edconrad, 2006/02/22
Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/22
- Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/22
    - Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Bob Cain, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/22
    - Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, tj Frazir, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, OG, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Greg Neill, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, tj Frazir, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Rock Brentwood, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Rock Brentwood, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/23
- Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Tony, 2006/02/22
- Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/24
- Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Doune, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Simple question for Spaceman, Tony, 2006/02/23
Problems in DH Perkins "Introduction to High Energy Physics", Tine, 2006/02/22
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 12: Constant Causation vs Constant Light, OsherD, 2006/02/22
- Re: Causation/Causality-OsherD, DECODED!!, Doctor Physics, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Causation/Causality-OsherD, DECODED!!, donstockbauer, 2006/02/22
    - Re: Causation/Causality-OsherD, DECODED!!, Dr Physics, 2006/02/22
Plastic Light, Doune, 2006/02/22
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Doune, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Doune, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Randy Poe, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Doune, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Doune, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Plastic Light, THE_ONE, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Plastic Light, sal, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Doune, 2006/02/22
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Re: Plastic Light, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Doune, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/23
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Re: Plastic Light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Doune, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Plastic Light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/25
- Re: Plastic Light, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Plastic Light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/22
    - Re: Plastic Light, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Plastic Light, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Plastic Light, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Plastic Light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Plastic Light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Plastic Light, SCW, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Plastic Light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Plastic Light, THE_ONE, 2006/02/25
Teaching physics to biology students, lgardner, 2006/02/22
- Re: Teaching physics to biology students, CWatters, 2006/02/22
- Re: Teaching physics to biology students, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/22
    - Re: Teaching physics to biology students, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
  - Message not available
    - Re: Teaching physics to biology students, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
- Re: Teaching physics to biology students, kenseto, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/22
    - Re: Teaching physics to biology students, kenseto, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Teaching physics to biology students, kenseto, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, kenseto, 2006/02/24
- Re: Teaching physics to biology students, PD, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Teaching physics to biology students, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/24
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Greg Neill, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Matthew Lybanon, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Greg Neill, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, donstockbauer, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, PD, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, PD, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Teaching physics to biology students, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/28
- Re: Teaching physics to biology students, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/23
- Message not available
  - Re: Teaching physics to biology students, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/23
Methane animation build complete-soon available., ma1ibu, 2006/02/22
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 11: Heisenberg and Superluminal, OsherD, 2006/02/22
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 11: Heisenberg and Superluminal, donstockbauer, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 11: Heisenberg and Superluminal, OsherD, 2006/02/22
Interactive Google Map for the Solar Eclipse (March 29 2006), swrsteph, 2006/02/21
Re: Free Energy, cnctut, 2006/02/21
Who Made God?, Jerry, 2006/02/21
A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby", S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/21
- Re: A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby", S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/21
- Re: A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby", Sam Wormley, 2006/02/21
  - Re: A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby", S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/21
- Re: A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby", S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/21
  - Re: A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby", S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/22
    - Re: A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby", S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/22
Mortal fools, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
- Re: Mortal fools, OG, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Mortal fools, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
- Re: Mortal fools, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/21
The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue, penseur, 2006/02/21
- Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/02/22
  - Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue, penseur, 2006/02/24
    - Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue, tadchem, 2006/02/26
- Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue, Edward Green, 2006/02/22
  - Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue, penseur, 2006/02/24
    - Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue, Edward Green, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue, kdthrge, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue, penseur, 2006/02/26
- Message not available
  - Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue, penseur, 2006/02/24
Re: Radiation reaction for a uniformly accelerated charge, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/21
A solar system with inner and outer parts rotating in opposite directions, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/21
- Re: A solar system with inner and outer parts rotating in opposite directions, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/21
  - Re: A solar system with inner and outer parts rotating in opposite directions, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
  - Re: A solar system with inner and outer parts rotating in opposite directions, OG, 2006/02/21
- Re: A solar system with inner and outer parts rotating in opposite directions, oriel36, 2006/02/22
  - Message not available
    - Re: A solar system with inner and outer parts rotating in opposite directions, oriel36, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: A solar system with inner and outer parts rotating in opposite directions, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: A solar system with inner and outer parts rotating in opposite directions, oriel36, 2006/02/23
- Re: A solar system with inner and outer parts rotating in opposite directions, tadchem, 2006/02/22
Europe to start EIT as their own MIT, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/21
LARSONIAN Relativity -- Einstein Was WRONG, rem460, 2006/02/21
- Re: LARSONIAN Relativity -- Einstein Was WRONG, dda1, 2006/02/22
  - Re: LARSONIAN Relativity -- Einstein Was WRONG, June R Harton, 2006/02/23
    - Re: LARSONIAN Relativity -- Einstein Was WRONG, donstockbauer, 2006/02/26
- Re: LARSONIAN Relativity -- Einstein Was WRONG, Ulrict Reinhold, 2006/02/26
Stupid questions about EMR, listerofsmeg01, 2006/02/21
- Re: Stupid questions about EMR, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
- Re: Stupid questions about EMR, FrediFizzx, 2006/02/21
- Re: Stupid questions about EMR, mmeron, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Stupid questions about EMR, listerofsmeg01, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Stupid questions about EMR, mmeron, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Stupid questions about EMR, listerofsmeg01, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Stupid questions about EMR, mmeron, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Stupid questions about EMR, listerofsmeg01, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Stupid questions about EMR, mmeron, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Stupid questions about EMR, listerofsmeg01, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Stupid questions about EMR, mmeron, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Stupid questions about EMR, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Stupid questions about EMR, Sulayman, 2006/02/21
- Re: Stupid questions about EMR, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/22
An objective Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium, instead of the current demonizing one, a_plutonium, 2006/02/21
The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
- Re: The train and the light inside., Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
  - Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
    - Re: The train and the light inside., Igor, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., tomgee, 2006/02/21
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., tomgee, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., tomgee, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., tomgee, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., tomgee, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., tomgee, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., tomgee, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., tomgee, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., tomgee, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., tomgee, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Sam Wormley, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., tomgee, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Sam Wormley, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., tomgee, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Igor, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
    - Re: The train and the light inside., T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/21
    - Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
  - Re: The train and the light inside., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/21
- Re: The train and the light inside., kenseto, 2006/02/21
  - Re: The train and the light inside., Sam Wormley, 2006/02/21
    - Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., kenseto, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Sam Wormley, 2006/02/22
  - Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
- Re: The train and the light inside., Sulayman, 2006/02/21
  - Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
    - Re: The train and the light inside., Sulayman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
- Re: The train and the light inside., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/21
  - Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
    - Re: The train and the light inside., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Relastic, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/21
- Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/22
  - Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
    - Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., PD, 2006/02/26
    - Re: The train and the light inside., Igor, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The train and the light inside., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
Superposed vs Superimposed, W. Watson, 2006/02/21
- Re: Superposed vs Superimposed, Edward Green, 2006/02/25
- Re: Superposed vs Superimposed, platopes, 2006/02/25
compressed air receiver flow, technical123, 2006/02/21
- Re: compressed air receiver flow, CWatters, 2006/02/21
  - Re: compressed air receiver flow, technical123, 2006/02/21
    - Re: compressed air receiver flow, CWatters, 2006/02/21
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 766 February 21, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/21
Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/21
- Re: Article unifies the four forces, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Article unifies the four forces, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
- Re: Article unifies the four forces, Richard Herring, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Article unifies the four forces, donstockbauer, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Article unifies the four forces, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Article unifies the four forces, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/22
    - Re: Article unifies the four forces, Mozart, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Article unifies the four forces, Richard Herring, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
- Re: Article unifies the four forces, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/21
- Re: Article unifies the four forces, tadchem, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
    - Re: Article unifies the four forces, hanson, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, hanson, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, hanson, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, hanson, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, platopes, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, hanson, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, tdp1001, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Article unifies the four forces, hanson, 2006/02/27
Talk.origins Pseudos' Dreaded Fear of ED CONRAD, Ed Conrad, 2006/02/21
Newton alternative?, amerwe, 2006/02/21
- Re: Newton alternative?, joe_avery_2005, 2006/02/24
  - Re: Newton alternative?, amerwe, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Newton alternative?, amerwe, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Newton alternative?, amerwe, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Newton alternative?, amerwe, 2006/02/28
- Re: Newton alternative?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/28
  - Re: Newton alternative?, amerwe, 2006/02/28
    - Re: Newton alternative?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Newton alternative?, amerwe, 2006/02/28
      
      Re: Newton alternative?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/28
Weight scales, Don1, 2006/02/21
- Re: Weight scales, Don1, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Weight scales, jclause, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Weight scales, Two, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Weight scales, Don1, 2006/02/23
- Re: Weight scales, PD, 2006/02/23
- Re: Weight scales, bill, 2006/02/23
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 10: Dependence Kernel Measures, OsherD, 2006/02/21
- Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 10: Dependence Kernel Measures, OsherD, 2006/02/21
Re: Historic Moment, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
How Does This Work?, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/02/20
- Re: How Does This Work?, hhc314, 2006/02/20
- Re: How Does This Work?, hhc314, 2006/02/20
- Re: How Does This Work?, hhc314, 2006/02/20
  - Re: How Does This Work?, Doune, 2006/02/21
- Re: How Does This Work?, Hakk, 2006/02/21
- Re: How Does This Work?, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/21
Call for Papers - The Journal of American Science, science, 2006/02/20
Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, a_plutonium, 2006/02/20
- Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, LuckyOne, 2006/02/20
- Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, richard miller, 2006/02/20
- Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, Matt, 2006/02/20
- Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, Minus XVII, 2006/02/20
- Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, a_plutonium, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, a_plutonium, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, a_plutonium, 2006/02/22
    - Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, Proginoskes, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, a_plutonium, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, donstockbauer, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, a_plutonium, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium; the problem of hatemongers and bashers solved, Proginoskes, 2006/02/23
Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
- Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
  - Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
- Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/20
  - Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Message not available
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., OG, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., OG, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., OG, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., OG, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., listerofsmeg01, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., OG, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., OG, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., tj Frazir, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., tj Frazir, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., PD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., PD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., PD, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., tj Frazir, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., OG, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Randy Poe, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., OG, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Greg Neill, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., briggs, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., tj Frazir, 2006/02/23
- Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton., Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 9: Tensors Only Approximate Causation, OsherD, 2006/02/20
physics, science, 2006/02/20
- Re: physics, uzman, 2006/02/20
  - Re: physics, science, 2006/02/22
- Re: physics, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
uckermann ratio, uzman, 2006/02/20
- Re: uckermann ratio, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
  - Re: uckermann ratio, uzman, 2006/02/22
*Good* pop-physics books?, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/20
- Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
  - Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/20
    - Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
  - Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, Bruce Scott TOK, 2006/02/21
    - Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/21
- Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, jcon, 2006/02/20
- Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, Igor, 2006/02/20
- Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
- Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, FrediFizzx, 2006/02/20
  - Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/20
    - Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, FrediFizzx, 2006/02/20
- Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/02/20
- Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, Bruce Scott TOK, 2006/02/21
- Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/21
  - Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/21
- Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, PD, 2006/02/21
- Re: *Good* pop-physics books?, Relastic, 2006/02/21
"The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Etis, 2006/02/20
- Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", FAX, 2006/02/20
Highly Relativistic Has Convertibility To Highly Dynamic, G. L. Bradford, 2006/02/20
Deep burn transmutation, Giuseppe, 2006/02/20
- Re: Deep burn transmutation, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/20
  - Re: Deep burn transmutation, Giuseppe, 2006/02/20
Re: FAQ - (the heretic's version), Hero . van . Jindelt, 2006/02/20
Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics, Dianelos Georgoudis, 2006/02/20
- Re: Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 2006/02/20
  - Re: Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics, Dianelos Georgoudis, 2006/02/21
- Re: Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics, Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/20
  - Re: Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics, Dianelos Georgoudis, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics, Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics, Dianelos Georgoudis, 2006/02/23
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, February 20, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2006/02/20
Dependent Losing Games May Add Up to a Win, OsherD, 2006/02/20
- Re: Dependent Losing Games May Add Up to a Win, OsherD, 2006/02/20
  - Re: Dependent Losing Games May Add Up to a Win, OsherD, 2006/02/20
Anisotropic Universe, OsherD, 2006/02/20
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 8: Dependence, OsherD, 2006/02/20
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 8: Dependence, OsherD, 2006/02/20
  - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 8: Dependence, OsherD, 2006/02/20
Get $5.00 BONUS and do your own FOREX TRADING, Get $5.00 BONUS and do your own FOREX TRADING, 2006/02/19
Whats going on??? Who ARE you people??? !, rick_sobie, 2006/02/19
- Re: Whats going on??? Who ARE you people??? !, Bob Cain, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Whats going on??? Who ARE you people??? !, rick_sobie, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Whats going on??? Who ARE you people??? !, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/20
  - Re: Whats going on??? Who ARE you people??? !, Doune, 2006/02/20
Quantum Theory Paradox: The Mean of a Finite Variable Can Be Infinite, OsherD, 2006/02/19
- Re: Quantum Theory Paradox: The Mean of a Finite Variable Can Be Infinite, Sulayman, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Quantum Theory Paradox: The Mean of a Finite Variable Can Be Infinite, OsherD, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Quantum Theory Paradox: The Mean of a Finite Variable Can Be Infinite, Sulayman, 2006/02/20
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 7: Sums of Variables and Anti-Multiplication, OsherD, 2006/02/19
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 6: New Interpretation of Riccati Equation, OsherD, 2006/02/19
Funny Spoof, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/02/19
- Re: Funny Spoof, Mitch Perkins, 2006/02/20
  - Re: Funny Spoof, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/02/20
  - Re: Funny Spoof, Roy L . Fuchs, 2006/02/20
RE: The mass of a photon, Jerry, 2006/02/19
- Re: The mass of a photon, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/19
  - Re: The mass of a photon, Doune, 2006/02/20
  - Re: The mass of a photon, Y.Porat, 2006/02/20
    - Re: The mass of a photon, Doune, 2006/02/20
loop quantum gravity, brad, 2006/02/19
planck's numbers, brad, 2006/02/19
- Re: planck's numbers, Doune, 2006/02/20
Osama Bin Laden and His Identical Twin., Ed Conrad, 2006/02/19
Flexi-gravity: It bends, it twists, it dances a jig!, Greysky, 2006/02/19
- Re: Flexi-gravity: It bends, it twists, it dances a jig!, hanson, 2006/02/19
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 5.1 Intersection as Multiplication, OsherD, 2006/02/19
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Emoh, 2006/02/19
Continuous Creation, Jerry, 2006/02/19
- Re: Continuous Creation, T Wake, 2006/02/19
- Re: Continuous Creation, Jerry, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Continuous Creation, Bill Baka, 2006/02/20
- Re: Continuous Creation, Jerry, 2006/02/22
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 5: Anti-Multiplication and Schwinger, OsherD, 2006/02/19
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 5: Anti-Multiplication and Schwinger, OsherD, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 5: Anti-Multiplication and Schwinger, OsherD, 2006/02/19
Trace of product of density operators, David McAnally, 2006/02/19
- Re: Trace of product of density operators, David McAnally, 2006/02/19
sponging method - dedanoe's di/pro-gressive error maker based on his imbalance thesis, dedanoe, 2006/02/19
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 4: Memory vs Complexity, OsherD, 2006/02/19
Re: SOLUTION TO CANE TOAD, donstockbauer, 2006/02/18
Life in the Cosmos, rev.goetz, 2006/02/18
- Re: Life in the Cosmos, boson boss, 2006/02/18
- Re: Life in the Cosmos, Teslia, 2006/02/19
- Re: Life in the Cosmos, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/19
- Re: Life in the Cosmos, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Life in the Cosmos, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Life in the Cosmos, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Life in the Cosmos, donstockbauer, 2006/02/19
Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/18
- Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), avergon, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), avergon, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/18
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Spaceman, 2006/02/18
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), tamanning, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bill Hobba, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), G. L. Bradford, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), G. L. Bradford, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Tom Roberts, 2006/02/18
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Doune, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Tom Roberts, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), carlip-nospam, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), sal, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), soup.or.string@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/24
- Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bill Hobba, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/19
  - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bill Hobba, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), G. L. Bradford, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), surrealistic-dream, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), surrealistic-dream, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), surrealistic-dream, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/21
      
      Message not available
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/22
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), carlip-nospam, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Randy Poe, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/22
      
      Message not available
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Traveler, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), surrealistic-dream, 2006/02/23
      
      Message not available
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), carlip-nospam, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), carlip-nospam, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), brian a m stuckless, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Sue..., 2006/02/25
      
      Message not available
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Eric Gisse, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/23
      
      Message not available
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), carlip-nospam, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bill Hobba, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bill Hobba, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), hanson, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), hanson, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bill Hobba, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bill Hobba, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bill Hobba, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Aetherist, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bill Hobba, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bilge, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bilge, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bilge, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bilge, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/25
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/23
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/23
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bilge, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bilge, 2006/02/24
- Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Eric Gisse, 2006/02/19
- Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), JanPB, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
- Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
- Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), kenseto, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), kenseto, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/20
- Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Traveler, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), JanPB, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), JanPB, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), JanPB, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), JanPB, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), JanPB, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), JanPB, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Relastic, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Bill Hobba, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), G. L. Bradford, 2006/02/21
- Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), kenseto, 2006/02/19
- Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), surrealistic-dream, 2006/02/20
- Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality), soup.or.string@xxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/24
Special relativity and velocity for given total energy, Max, 2006/02/18
- Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/18
- Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy, srp, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy, Max, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy, Max, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy, Bilge, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy, srp, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy, Max, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy, srp, 2006/02/20
- Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy, Jim Heckman, 2006/02/22
Misconception of Mass, Mozart, 2006/02/18
- Re: Misconception of Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Misconception of Mass, Mozart, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Misconception of Mass, Mozart, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Misconception of Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/19
- Re: Misconception of Mass, FrediFizzx, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Misconception of Mass, Two, 2006/02/18
    - Re: Misconception of Mass, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/02/18
    - Re: Misconception of Mass, FrediFizzx, 2006/02/19
- Re: Misconception of Mass, tdp1001, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Misconception of Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Misconception of Mass, tdp1001, 2006/02/19
- Re: Misconception of Mass, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/02/19
- Re: Misconception of Mass, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Misconception of Mass, tdp1001, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Misconception of Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, tdp1001, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, tdp1001, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, tdp1001, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Misconception of Mass, googlegroupie, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, Don1, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Misconception of Mass, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, tdp1001, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, tdp1001, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, Mozart, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, tdp1001, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, Y.Porat, 2006/02/23
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Misconception of Mass, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
Greek Alphabet, Anon, 2006/02/18
- Re: Greek Alphabet, tadchem, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Greek Alphabet, Anon, 2006/02/18
Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
- Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
    - Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Randy Poe, 2006/02/21
      
      Message not available
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, tj Frazir, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, tj Frazir, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, tj Frazir, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, mmeron, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, mmeron, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, mmeron, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Message not available
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, tj Frazir, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Randy Poe, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Flying around in a circle, T Wake, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Flying around in a circle, tj Frazir, 2006/02/18
- Re: Flying around in a circle, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
- Re: Flying around in a circle, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Flying around in a circle, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
- Re: Flying around in a circle, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/02/18
tunneling half time, sigoldberg1, 2006/02/18
Update on Methane molecule animation., ma1ibu, 2006/02/18
Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Michael Ejercito, 2006/02/18
- Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
- Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Bob Cain, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Jonathan Silverlight, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Craig Markwardt, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Bob Cain, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Craig Markwardt, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Craig Markwardt, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Jeff Root, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Craig Markwardt, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Michael Ejercito, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Sjouke Burry, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Quesrtion About White Dwarfs, Craig Markwardt, 2006/02/21
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 3: Integral Equations, OsherD, 2006/02/18
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 3: Integral Equations, OsherD, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 3: Integral Equations, OsherD, 2006/02/18
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 2.1: I[f(x)delta(x-y)]dx = f(y), OsherD, 2006/02/18
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 2.1: I[f(x)delta(x-y)]dx = f(y), OsherD, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 2.1: I[f(x)delta(x-y)]dx = f(y), OsherD, 2006/02/18
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 2: t2 - t1 or t - t1, OsherD, 2006/02/18
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 2: t2 - t1 or t - t1, OsherD, 2006/02/18
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution, OsherD, 2006/02/18
- Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution, OsherD, 2006/02/18
Calculating Dogs, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
- Re: Calculating Dogs, donstockbauer, 2006/02/18
Physicists look at birdsong, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
- Re: Physicists look at birdsong, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/18
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 17 February 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
THE OSLO 3:D DEGREE EQUATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS BÖRJESSON, 2006/02/17
Why does Gravity slows down time, Relastic, 2006/02/17
- Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Doune, 2006/02/17
  - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, donstockbauer, 2006/02/17
    - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Relastic, 2006/02/17
- Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/17
  - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Relastic, 2006/02/17
    - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Relastic, 2006/02/17
    - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/17
  - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Traveler, 2006/02/18
- Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, xxein, 2006/02/17
- Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Sue..., 2006/02/17
  - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Sue..., 2006/02/18
- Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
  - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Traveler, 2006/02/18
    - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Traveler, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Traveler, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Traveler, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Relastic, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Traveler, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, joe_avery_2005, 2006/02/20
- Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 2006/02/18
- Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Traveler, 2006/02/18
- Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Henry Haapalainen, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
    - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, xxein, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Sylvain, 2006/02/25
- Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, dedanoe, 2006/02/19
- Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Traveler, 2006/02/19
    - Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Traveler, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, donstockbauer, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Why does Gravity slows down time, Doune, 2006/02/20
Thermo 2, Doune, 2006/02/17
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Feb 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/17
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Feb 06 Washington, DC, Doune, 2006/02/17
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Feb 06 Washington, DC, donstockbauer, 2006/02/18
  - Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Feb 06 Washington, DC, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/02/21
    - Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Feb 06 Washington, DC, donstockbauer, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Feb 06 Washington, DC, donstockbauer, 2006/02/28
Re: God creates justice, Torchy, 2006/02/17
The Pit of Hell, Jerry, 2006/02/17
- Re: The Pit of Hell, Edward Green, 2006/02/25
- Re: The Pit of Hell, platopes, 2006/02/25
God at Infinity, Jerry, 2006/02/17
- Re: God at Infinity, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/17
"The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Emoh, 2006/02/17
Momentum FINALLY Shifting to Ed Conrad.., Ed Conrad, 2006/02/17
Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/17
- Re: Relativity for the Masses, donstockbauer, 2006/02/17
- Re: Relativity for the Masses, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/17
  - Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/17
    - Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Randy Poe, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Relastic, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, tj Frazir, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, T Wake, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Relativity for the Masses, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
    - Re: Relativity for the Masses, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Relativity for the Masses, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
    - Re: Relativity for the Masses, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
- Re: Relativity for the Masses, Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/18
- Re: Relativity for the Masses, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/02/19
- A theory of everything that _Matters_., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/27
  - Re: A theory of everything that _Matters_., T Wake, 2006/02/28
- Relativity For The Masses, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 2006/02/18
Uniting Quatumn Entanglement (Action at A Distance) and Relativity--Moving Dimensions Theory, drelliot, 2006/02/17
- Re: Uniting Quatumn Entanglement (Action at A Distance) and Relativity--Moving Dimensions Theory, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/17
How heavier atoms be built from hydrogen atom or deuterium?, newedana, 2006/02/17
- Re: How heavier atoms be built from hydrogen atom or deuterium?, science, 2006/02/17
- Re: How heavier atoms be built from hydrogen atom or deuterium?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/17
  - Re: How heavier atoms be built from hydrogen atom or deuterium?, newedana, 2006/02/26
data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe, dedanoe, 2006/02/17
- Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/17
  - Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe, dedanoe, 2006/02/18
    - Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/20
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe, dedanoe, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe, dedanoe, 2006/02/23
$9,700 Sedan?, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/17
- Re: $9,700 Sedan?, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/17
- Re: $9,700 Sedan?, tadchem, 2006/02/18
Real Time, G. L. Bradford, 2006/02/17
- Re: Real Time, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/17
- Re: Real Time, tomgee, 2006/02/17
size of universe question, Steve Pope, 2006/02/16
- Re: size of universe question, Relastic, 2006/02/16
- Re: size of universe question, PD, 2006/02/17
- Message not available
  - Re: size of universe question, PD, 2006/02/17
- Message not available
  - Re: size of universe question, Dr Nanduri, 2006/02/26
Wattage produced by x gm. radium, Protoman, 2006/02/16
- Re: Wattage produced by x gm. radium, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/02/17
  - Re: Wattage produced by x gm. radium, Bob Cain, 2006/02/17
  - Re: Wattage produced by x gm. radium, Protoman, 2006/02/17
    - Re: Wattage produced by x gm. radium, CWatters, 2006/02/17
Building a Laser Weapon, Protoman, 2006/02/16
- Re: Building a Laser Weapon, Randy Poe, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Building a Laser Weapon, Protoman, 2006/02/16
    - Re: Building a Laser Weapon, CWatters, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Building a Laser Weapon, Unit-43, 2006/02/17
    - Re: Building a Laser Weapon, tj Frazir, 2006/02/17
  - Re: Building a Laser Weapon, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/17
- Re: Building a Laser Weapon, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Building a Laser Weapon, Protoman, 2006/02/17
    - Re: Building a Laser Weapon, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/17
- Re: Building a Laser Weapon, PD, 2006/02/17
- Building a Laser Weapon, Protoman, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Building a Laser Weapon, John, 2006/02/16
Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
- Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, John, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
    - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, John, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, John, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, John, 2006/02/16
- Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
    - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, RP, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, John, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, John, 2006/02/16
    - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Unit-43, 2006/02/16
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Unit-43, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Message not available
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Bob Cain, 2006/02/16
    - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
- Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
- Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Unit-43, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
    - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Unit-43, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Unit-43, 2006/02/16
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Unit-43, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
- Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Unit-43, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
    - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Unit-43, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Unit-43, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
- Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/18
  - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
    - Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
A Universe without GR, Relastic, 2006/02/16
- Re: A Universe without GR, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/16
  - Re: A Universe without GR, Relastic, 2006/02/16
    - Re: A Universe without GR, richard miller, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, richard miller, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Len Gaasenbeek, 2006/02/17
    - Re: A Universe without GR, T Wake, 2006/02/16
    - Re: A Universe without GR, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, hanson, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Relastic, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Relastic, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Relastic, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Relastic, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Relastic, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Relastic, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, hanson, 2006/02/17
  - Re: A Universe without GR, MobyDikc, 2006/02/17
    - Re: A Universe without GR, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: A Universe without GR, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
    - Re: A Universe without GR, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/17
- Re: A Universe without GR, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
- Re: A Universe without GR, carlip-nospam, 2006/02/17
  - Re: A Universe without GR, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/17
Re: Patinha is Lina's _Only_ issue., T Wake, 2006/02/16
- I pay and pay and get little in return., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
  - Re: I pay and pay and get little in return., T Wake, 2006/02/16
    - Don't be Clownin' my dogs., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
  - Re: I pay and pay and get little in return., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
    - Re: I pay and pay and get little in return., Peter Köhlmann, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: I pay and pay and get little in return., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
  - Message not available
    - Nature is killing me fast enough, I see no need to rush it., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Nature is killing me fast enough, I see no need to rush it., Rick, 2006/02/17
Re: ChrisV's crappy scoring and endless one word posts., T Wake, 2006/02/16
- My scoring, editing, searching and posting systems..., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
  - Re: My scoring, editing, searching and posting systems..., T Wake, 2006/02/16
How to search, how to find?, moa, 2006/02/16
- Re: How to search, how to find?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/16
  - Re: How to search, how to find?, moa, 2006/02/16
    - Re: How to search, how to find?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: How to search, how to find?, moa, 2006/02/16
- Re: How to search, how to find?, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/16
A few gedankens involving light, RP, 2006/02/16
- Re: A few gedankens involving light, John, 2006/02/16
  - Re: A few gedankens involving light, RP, 2006/02/16
    - Re: A few gedankens involving light, John, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, RP, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, John, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, RP, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, John, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, RP, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, John, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, RP, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, John, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, RP, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, John, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, RP, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, tdp1001, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/16
- Re: A few gedankens involving light, Paul Cardinale, 2006/02/17
  - Re: A few gedankens involving light, RP, 2006/02/17
    - Re: A few gedankens involving light, RP, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, donstockbauer, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, RP, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Sue..., 2006/02/18
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/18
    - Re: A few gedankens involving light, Paul Cardinale, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, RP, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Sue..., 2006/02/21
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Sue..., 2006/02/21
- Re: A few gedankens involving light, Sue..., 2006/02/19
  - Re: A few gedankens involving light, tdp1001, 2006/02/19
    - Re: A few gedankens involving light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, tdp1001, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, tdp1001, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Sue..., 2006/02/21
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Sue..., 2006/02/22
      
      Message not available
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, tdp1001, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Sue..., 2006/02/23
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/22
      
      Message not available
      Re: A few gedankens involving light, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/22
- Re: A few gedankens involving light, Tom Roberts, 2006/02/19
"The Nature of Mass", Emoh, 2006/02/16
Re: Beyond Not Even Wrong: The End of String Theory According To Nobel Prize Winners: String theorists don't make predictions, they make excuses. -Feynman String theory is like a 50 year old woman wearing too much lipstick. -Laughlin String theory has failed in its primary goal -Sheldon Glashow String theory is a figment of the theoretical mind. -Martinus VeltmanString theory is a futile exercise as physics. -Phil Anderson :: MDT to the rescue!!!!!, SleepyHeed, 2006/02/16
- Re: Beyond Not Even Wrong: The End of String Theory According To Nobel Prize Winners: String theorists don't make predictions, they make excuses. -Feynman String theory is like a 50 year old woman wearing too much lipstick. -Laughlin String theory has failed in its primary goal -Sheldon Glashow String theory is a figment of the theoretical mind. -Martinus VeltmanString theory is a futile exercise as physics. -Phil Anderson :: MDT to the rescue!!!!!, drelliot, 2006/02/17
  - Re: Beyond Not Even Wrong: The End of String Theory According To Nobel Prize Winners: String theorists don't make predictions, they make excuses. -Feynman String theory is like a 50 year old woman wearing too much lipstick. -Laughlin String theory has failed in its primary goal -Sheldon Glashow String theory is a figment of the theoretical mind. -Martinus VeltmanString theory is a futile exercise as physics. -Phil Anderson :: MDT to the rescue!!!!!, soundhaspriority, 2006/02/17
- Re: Beyond Not Even Wrong: The End of String Theory According To Nobel Prize Winners: String theorists don't make predictions, they make excuses. -Feynman String theory is like a 50 year old woman wearing too much lipstick. -Laughlin String theory has failed in its primary goal -Sheldon Glashow String theory is a figment of the theoretical mind. -Martinus VeltmanString theory is a futile exercise as physics. -Phil Anderson :: MDT to the rescue!!!!!, larryhammick, 2006/02/17
Measuring Photovoltaic cells' Efficiency, MatGilson, 2006/02/16
PROOF THAT THERE ARE AN INFINITY OF PRIMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS BÖRJESSON, 2006/02/16
- Re: PROOF THAT THERE ARE AN INFINITY OF PRIMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, donstockbauer, 2006/02/16
Julian Schwinger (Nobel Laureate) and Causality, OsherD, 2006/02/16
ALL M IS DIVISIBLE BY SOME OF THE NUMBERS:, NILS BÖRJESSON, 2006/02/16
- ALL M IS DIVISIBLE BY SOME OF THE NUMBERS:, NILS BÖRJESSON, 2006/02/16
Predictability and Energy, Physitrex, 2006/02/16
- Re: Predictability and Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Predictability and Energy, Physitrex, 2006/02/16
    - Re: Predictability and Energy, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Predictability and Energy, Physitrex, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Predictability and Energy, Physitrex, 2006/02/17
- Re: Predictability and Energy, Y.Porat, 2006/02/16
- Re: Predictability and Energy, PD, 2006/02/17
- Re: Predictability and Energy, Mike, 2006/02/17
Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence 3: Correction, OsherD, 2006/02/15
- Re: Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence 3: Correction, OsherD, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence 3: Correction, John, 2006/02/16
Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence 2: Why the Reversal, OsherD, 2006/02/15
- Re: Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence 2: Why the Reversal, OsherD, 2006/02/15
Universe and motion, Orion, 2006/02/15
- Re: Universe and motion, Orion, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Universe and motion, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Universe and motion, uri, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Universe and motion, xichimos, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Universe and motion, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Universe and motion, xichimos, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Universe and motion, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/17
  - Re: Universe and motion, xichimos, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Universe and motion, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Universe and motion, xichimos, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Universe and motion, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Universe and motion, xichimos, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Universe and motion, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Universe and motion, xichimos, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Universe and motion, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Universe and motion, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Universe and motion, PD, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Universe and motion, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Universe and motion, PD, 2006/02/17
  - Re: Universe and motion, PD, 2006/02/16
Easy thermochemistry question, Colin, 2006/02/15
- Re: Easy thermochemistry question!, RP, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Easy thermochemistry question!, Colin, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Easy thermochemistry question!, tadchem, 2006/02/16
    - Re: Easy thermochemistry question!, RP, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Easy thermochemistry question!, Doune, 2006/02/18
Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence, OsherD, 2006/02/15
- Re: Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence, OsherD, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence, OsherD, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence, OsherD, 2006/02/15
Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/15
- Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, donstockbauer, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/16
- Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/17
    - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
    - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, donstockbauer, 2006/02/18
- Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/20
  - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, QCD Apprentice, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Aetherist, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, PD, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, PD, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, PD, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, PD, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, PD, 2006/02/23
  - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Mathematical model of inertia, MobyDikc, 2006/02/21
- Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Rock Brentwood, 2006/02/22
Simple question driving me nuts!, Samantha, 2006/02/15
- Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, PD, 2006/02/15
- Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, PD, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, PD, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Mike, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Mike Yarwood, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Mike, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/19
- Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
- Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Greg Neill, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, PD, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, PD, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, jclause, 2006/02/16
- Re: Simple question driving me nuts!, John C . Polasek, 2006/02/17
Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?, Jason Stanidge, 2006/02/15
- Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?, JMA, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?, Jason Stanidge, 2006/02/16
- Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?, pixel_a_ted, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?, Jason Stanidge, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?, pixel_a_ted, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?, Jason Stanidge, 2006/02/18
- Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?, dedanoe, 2006/02/18
the armagedon begins now, dedanoe, 2006/02/15
- Re: the armagedon begins now, Torchy, 2006/02/18
- Re: the armagedon begins now, tadchem, 2006/02/18
  - Re: the armagedon begins now, donstockbauer, 2006/02/18
New Conception of Time: Moving Dimensions Theory, drelliot, 2006/02/15
- Re: New Conception of Time: Moving Dimensions Theory, AllYou!, 2006/02/15
  - Re: New Conception of Time: Moving Dimensions Theory, rbcc, 2006/02/16
- Re: New Conception of Time: Moving Dimensions Theory, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/15
- Re: New Conception of Time: Moving Dimensions Theory, Joe, 2006/02/16
Re: My formal _Answer_ to the eviction summons I was served yesterday., T Wake, 2006/02/15
- It's tit for tat..., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/15
  - Re: It's tit for tat..., CWatters, 2006/02/15
    - The renter to my immediate right..., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The renter to my immediate right..., T Wake, 2006/02/15
      
      Evicting the most tenured tenants to avoid Setttle's relocation fees., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Evicting the most tenured tenants to avoid Setttle's relocation fees., T Wake, 2006/02/15
      
      T_Wake, F_ck off you bastard., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: T_Wake, F_ck off you bastard., T Wake, 2006/02/15
      
      Ya gotta pay the price if ya wanna be nice., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Ya gotta pay the price if ya wanna be nice., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Ya gotta pay the price if ya wanna be nice., T Wake, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Ya gotta pay the price if ya wanna be nice., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Ya gotta pay the price if ya wanna be nice., T Wake, 2006/02/16
      
      Patinha injects her coffee, as they say., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Patinha injects her coffee, as they say., T Wake, 2006/02/16
      
      True altruism expects nothing in return., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: True altruism expects nothing in return., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: True altruism expects nothing in return., T Wake, 2006/02/17
      
      Punishments are exactly what I expect an altruist to get., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Punishments are exactly what I expect an altruist to get., T Wake, 2006/02/17
      
      Acquiring and maintaining a place of her own., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Acquiring and maintaining a place of her own., T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Drug abuse is the issue. Petroleum abuse, food abuse... not use., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Drug abuse is the issue. Petroleum abuse, food abuse... not use., T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Message not available
      Re: I'm God's prisoner, and God to my prisoners., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/22
      
      Message not available
      Re: I'm God's prisoner, and God to my prisoners., T Wake, 2006/02/22
      
      Nietzsche's failed attempt to find God and meaning in life., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/23
      
      And Then If I Have Some Beans, I Post That To Sci.Physics, Too, platopes, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Nietzsche's failed attempt to find God and meaning in life., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      In this sad game of life we're playing, everyone loses in the end., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: In this sad game of life we're playing, everyone loses in the end., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: In this sad game of life we're playing, everyone loses in the end., tdp1001, 2006/02/24
      
      Fuel junkies., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/24
    - Re: It's tit for tat..., tj Frazir, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: It's tit for tat..., T Wake, 2006/02/15
  - Re: It's tit for tat..., T Wake, 2006/02/15
    - I've got everything but money., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: I've got everything but money., T Wake, 2006/02/15
      
      Money doesn't interest me... live with it., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Money doesn't interest me... live with it., T Wake, 2006/02/15
      
      I'm pushing Lina's buttons, that's all., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: I'm pushing Lina's buttons, that's all., Rick, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: I'm pushing Lina's buttons, that's all., T Wake, 2006/02/16
      
      I'm strategizing, not complaining., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: I'm strategizing, not complaining., T Wake, 2006/02/16
      
      Propping up rich people's loathsome addictions to crude oil., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Propping up rich people's loathsome addictions to crude oil., T Wake, 2006/02/16
      
      Homeless drug addicts are better than petroleum addicts., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Homeless drug addicts are better than petroleum addicts., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      I work at home and on campus., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: I work at home and on campus., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: I work at home and on campus., John Bailo, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: I work at home and on campus., T Wake, 2006/02/17
      
      The hordes of people who kill and die on highways and in Iraq., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The hordes of people who kill and die on highways and in Iraq., T Wake, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The hordes of people who kill and die on highways and in Iraq., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The hordes of people who kill and die on highways and in Iraq., T Wake, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Homeless drug addicts are better than petroleum addicts., T Wake, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Homeless drug addicts are better than petroleum addicts., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Homeless drug addicts are better than petroleum addicts., T Wake, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: I've got everything but money., John Bailo, 2006/02/15
      
      I have many options to explore, including putting my landlord out of business., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/15
- Re: My formal _Answer_ to the eviction summons I was served yesterday., Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/15
"Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Emoh, 2006/02/15
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Orion, 2006/02/15
Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With Billions?, drelliot, 2006/02/15
- Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With Billions?, Relastic, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With Billions?, drelliot, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With Billions?, Igor, 2006/02/17
- Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With Billions?, Igor, 2006/02/15
- Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With Billions?, trigbyakid, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With Billions?, Brian Fletcher, 2006/02/15
- Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With Billions?, PD, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With Billions?, drelliot, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With [sic] Billions?, Rock Brentwood, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With [sic] Billions?, drelliot, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Sting Theory's Postulates [meaning the health care crisis], Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With [sic] Billions?, Rock Brentwood, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Sting Theory's Postulates [meaning the health care crisis], Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With [sic] Billions?, drelliot, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With [sic] Billions?, donstockbauer, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With [sic] Billions?, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With [sic] Billions?, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With [sic] Billions?, Bilge, 2006/02/19
What really is Time, seriously?, Relastic, 2006/02/15
- Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/15
  - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Relastic, 2006/02/15
    - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/15
    - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, G. L. Bradford, 2006/02/15
    - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, donstockbauer, 2006/02/16
  - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, tj Frazir, 2006/02/16
- Re: What really is Time, seriously?, oriel36, 2006/02/15
  - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/15
    - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: What really is Time, seriously?, oriel36, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
- Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/15
  - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Relastic, 2006/02/15
    - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/15
    - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
  - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
    - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
- Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/15
- Re: What really is Time, seriously?, drelliot, 2006/02/15
  - Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/15
- Re: What really is Time, seriously?, JMA, 2006/02/15
- Re: What really is Time, seriously?, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/15
- Time is actually parochial and static., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Time is actually parochial and static., T Wake, 2006/02/15
    - T_Wake, madly deluded., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: T_Wake, madly deluded., T Wake, 2006/02/16
      
      T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! I dare you !, Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! I dare you !, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Like the universe itself, black holes dissipate., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Like the universe itself, black holes dissipate., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! I dare you !, T Wake, 2006/02/16
      
      There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating., T Wake, 2006/02/16
      
      WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Heat_death., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Heat_death., T Wake, 2006/02/17
      
      From effectively no entropy to effectively infinite dissipation., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: From effectively no entropy to effectively infinite dissipation., T Wake, 2006/02/24
      
      Everything has just always been, and will continue to be, dissipating., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/24
      
      The shape of Space_Time_Entropy, not space., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
      
      The www. prefix., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The www. prefix., T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The www. prefix., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The www. prefix., T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The shape of Space_Time_Entropy, not space., T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Everything has just always been, and will continue to be, dissipating., T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      NASA Specialized Center of Research and Training, NSCORT, in Exobiology., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: NASA Specialized Center of Research and Training, NSCORT, in Exobiology., T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      T_Wake lives in la la land., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: T_Wake lives in la la land., T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      T_Wake, You'll know I'm right when you start losing., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: T_Wake, You'll know I'm right when you start losing., T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      T_Wake, GR is simple, you just can't handle it., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: T_Wake, GR is simple, you just can't handle it., T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      Like evolution, Space_Time_Entropy is a mature topic., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Like evolution, Space_Time_Entropy is a mature topic., T Wake, 2006/02/25
      
      T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death., tj Frazir, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death., tj Frazir, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Like evolution, Space_Time_Entropy is a mature topic., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/25
      
      The future is every bit as determined as the past., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The future is every bit as determined as the past., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/25
      
      The house _Always_ wins in the long run., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The house _Always_ wins in the long run., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The house _Always_ wins in the long run., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/25
      
      Hawking said the future was set in stone., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Hawking said the future was set in stone., tj Frazir, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Hawking said the future was set in stone., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Hawking said the future was set in stone., Traveler, 2006/02/26
      
      I won't put myself in the hands of someone with such a wild imagination., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: The house _Always_ wins in the long run., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: The house _Always_ wins in the long run., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/26
      
      No_Where in nature is there a perfect vacuum or infinite density., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: No_Where in nature is there a perfect vacuum or infinite density., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: No_Where in nature is there a perfect vacuum or infinite density., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/26
      
      Everything is already determined, that's a _Hard_ fact., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Everything is already determined, that's a _Hard_ fact., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: No_Where in nature is there a perfect vacuum or infinite density., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: The house _Always_ wins in the long run., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: The future is every bit as determined as the past., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Like evolution, Space_Time_Entropy is a mature topic., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: Like evolution, Space_Time_Entropy is a mature topic., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/26
      
      T_Wake is _Not_ sober., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T_Wake is _Not_ sober., T Wake, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T_Wake is _Not_ sober., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: T_Wake is _Not_ sober., T Wake, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: T_Wake is _Not_ sober., Mark Martin, 2006/02/26
      
      Unlike Mark_Martin, I actually have something to say., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/26
      
      Most of Sci.Physics's _Most_Discussed_Articles_ were Google posts., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Most of Sci.Physics's _Most_Discussed_Articles_ were Google posts., T Wake, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Unlike Mark_Martin, I actually have something to say., T Wake, 2006/02/27
      
      Don1, Spaceman, OsherD, DJM, Turcard, Traveller et al., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Don1, Spaceman, OsherD, DJM, Turcard, Traveller et al., T Wake, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Don1, Spaceman, OsherD, DJM, Turcard, Traveller et al., tj Frazir, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Don1, Spaceman, OsherD, DJM, Turcard, Traveller et al., tj Frazir, 2006/02/27
      
      T.J., Send someone by for a piss test or whatever., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: T.J., Send someone by for a piss test or whatever., T Wake, 2006/02/27
      
      Tobacco smokers are the soberest people I know., Jeff_Яelf, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: Tobacco smokers are the soberest people I know., T Wake, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: T_Wake is _Not_ sober., T Wake, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Heat_death., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Heat_death., T Wake, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Heat_death., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Heat_death., T Wake, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating., Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating., Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! I dare you !, tj Frazir, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! I dareyou !, T Wake, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! I dareyou !, tj Frazir, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! Idareyou !, T Wake, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! Idareyou !, tj Frazir, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! Idareyou!, T Wake, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! Idareyou !, tj Frazir, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, T Wake, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, tj Frazir, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, T Wake, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, tj Frazir, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, T Wake, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, tj Frazir, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, tj Frazir, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, tj Frazir, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, tj Frazir, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, tj Frazir, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !, T Wake, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Time is actually parochial and static., G. L. Bradford, 2006/02/16
Re: 100 000 TONS OF GOLD AT THE FOOT OF CHINA !, donstockbauer, 2006/02/15
- Re: 100 000 TONS OF GOLD AT THE FOOT OF CHINA !, donstockbauer, 2006/02/15
  - Re: 100 000 TONS OF GOLD AT THE FOOT OF CHINA !, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/15
    - Re: 100 000 TONS OF GOLD AT THE FOOT OF CHINA !, tj Frazir, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: 100 000 TONS OF GOLD AT THE FOOT OF CHINA !, T Wake, 2006/02/15
- Re: 100 000 TONS OF GOLD AT THE FOOT OF CHINA !, donstockbauer, 2006/02/18
Nanotubes break superconducting record, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/14
- Message not available
  - Re: Nanotubes break superconducting record, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/15
Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/14
- Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, mmeron, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, mmeron, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, mmeron, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, mmeron, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, mmeron, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Edward Green, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Ken Muldrew, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, mmeron, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Ken Muldrew, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Ken Muldrew, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Edward Green, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, mmeron, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Ken Muldrew, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Edward Green, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Ken Muldrew, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Edward Green, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, mmeron, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, mmeron, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Ken Muldrew, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, mmeron, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/16
    - Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, mmeron, 2006/02/16
    - Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/17
- Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, tj Frazir, 2006/02/17
  - Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field, T Wake, 2006/02/17
[ANN] SDX Dynamic Systems Simulation Software, Tim Silva, 2006/02/14
Re: Planck length calculated assuming D>3 dimensions - would it be larger?, stargene, 2006/02/14
The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
- Re: The speed of light revisited, Bob Cain, 2006/02/14
  - Message not available
    - Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
  - Message not available
    - Re: The speed of light revisited, Bob Cain, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Orion, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Orion, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Orion, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Orion, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
- Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
  - Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/15
    - Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/15
- Re: The speed of light revisited, oriel36, 2006/02/15
  - Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
    - Re: The speed of light revisited, oriel36, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, oriel36, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, oriel36, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, oriel36, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, oriel36, 2006/02/22
- Re: The speed of light revisited, Relastic, 2006/02/15
- Re: The speed of light revisited, PD, 2006/02/16
  - Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
    - Re: The speed of light revisited, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, PD, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, PD, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, asdf, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, asdf, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Message not available
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Message not available
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Message not available
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Message not available
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Message not available
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, asdf, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Bob Cain, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Message not available
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, tj Frazir, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Bob Cain, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Message not available
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/19
      
      Message not available
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Message not available
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, T Wake, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Greg Neill, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Bob Cain, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Al Zenner, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
- Re: The speed of light revisited, Anders, 2006/02/17
  - Re: The speed of light revisited, PD, 2006/02/17
    - Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/17
- Re: The speed of light revisited, Michael Ejercito, 2006/02/18
  - Re: The speed of light revisited, Spaceman, 2006/02/18
Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Relastic, 2006/02/14
- Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, kd5jos, 2006/02/14
  - Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
  - Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Relastic, 2006/02/14
    - Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/15
- Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
- Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/14
  - Message not available
    - Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Relastic, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Bob Cain, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, RP, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, carlip-nospam, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, RP, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, RP, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, RP, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Sue..., 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, PD, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, RP, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, RP, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, RP, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, RP, 2006/02/17
  - Message not available
    - Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, carlip-nospam, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, JanPB, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, JanPB, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, donstockbauer, 2006/02/16
- Re: Can spacetime metrical field exist without matter?, Bilge, 2006/02/16
EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish, bchorng, 2006/02/14
- Re: EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
  - Re: EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/14
- Re: EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/14
- Re: EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish, Richard Herring, 2006/02/15
  - Re: EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/15
    - Re: EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish, Richard Herring, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/16
the first equation in general physics 2 that i have is incorrect, dedanoe, 2006/02/14
- Re: the first equation in general physics 2 that i have is incorrect, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/14
  - Re: the first equation in general physics 2 that i have is incorrect, dedanoe, 2006/02/15
- Re: the first equation in general physics 2 that i have is incorrect, Randy Poe, 2006/02/15
  - Re: the first equation in general physics 2 that i have is incorrect, dedanoe, 2006/02/17
- Re: the first equation in general physics 2 that i have is incorrect, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/17
building a small-college cluster for computational physics, nt moore, 2006/02/14
- Re: building a small-college cluster for computational physics, madscientist5500, 2006/02/14
  - Re: building a small-college cluster for computational physics, physicsboy, 2006/02/14
- Re: building a small-college cluster for computational physics, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/14
- Re: building a small-college cluster for computational physics, physicsboy, 2006/02/14
  - Re: building a small-college cluster for computational physics, madscientist5500, 2006/02/14
    - Re: building a small-college cluster for computational physics, madscientist5500, 2006/02/15
Description of the Universe, madscientist5500, 2006/02/14
- Re: Description of the Universe, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/14
- Message not available
  - Re: Description of the Universe, madscientist5500, 2006/02/14
- Re: Description of the Universe, dedanoe, 2006/02/14
- Re: Description of the Universe, John Bailey, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Description of the Universe, madscientist5500, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Description of the Universe, John Bailey, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Description of the Universe, madscientist5500, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Description of the Universe, madscientist5500, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Description of the Universe, John Bailey, 2006/02/15
- Re: Description of the Universe, Orion, 2006/02/15
- Re: Description of the Universe, PD, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Description of the Universe, physicsboy, 2006/02/15
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 765 February14, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/14
The General Science Journal, avergon, 2006/02/14
Tragedy of the commons, Orion, 2006/02/14
- Re: Tragedy of the commons, donstockbauer, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Tragedy of the commons, The Trucker, 2006/02/16
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Tragedy of the commons, The Trucker, 2006/02/16
"Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Emoh, 2006/02/14
Correlation: Cosmic Ray X-rays and Lightning Strikes, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/14
Fairy Tale Physics: Myths and Legends Explained, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/14
- Re: Fairy Tale Physics: Myths and Legends Explained, John Schutkeker, 2006/02/14
George Green and Causality, OsherD, 2006/02/14
- Re: George Green and Causality, OsherD, 2006/02/14
  - Re: George Green and Causality, OsherD, 2006/02/14
Open letter to "John Smith", tdp1001, 2006/02/13
- Re: Open letter to "John Smith", T Wake, 2006/02/14
  - Re: Open letter to "John Smith", tdp1001, 2006/02/14
    - Re: Open letter to "John Smith", T Wake, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Open letter to "John Smith", tdp1001, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Open letter to "John Smith", T Wake, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Open letter to "John Smith", tdp1001, 2006/02/14
      
      Very OT Now (was: Re: Open letter to "John Smith"), T Wake, 2006/02/15
- Re: Open letter to "John Smith", hanson, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Open letter to "John Smith", tdp1001, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Open letter to "John Smith", tdp1001, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Open letter to "John Smith", T Wake, 2006/02/16
    - Re: Open letter to "John Smith", hanson, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Open letter to "John Smith", tdp1001, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Open letter to "John Smith", hanson, 2006/02/16
Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax, tj Frazir, 2006/02/13
- Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax, Bob Cain, 2006/02/14
- Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax, T Wake, 2006/02/14
  - Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax, donstockbauer, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax, tj Frazir, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax, T Wake, 2006/02/16
- Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax, tj Frazir, 2006/02/16
  - Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax, T Wake, 2006/02/16
- Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax, tj Frazir, 2006/02/25
energy needed to magnetise, matt271829-news, 2006/02/13
Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence, OsherD, 2006/02/13
- Re: Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence, OsherD, 2006/02/13
- Re: Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence, vanep, 2006/02/15
  - Re: Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence, OsherD, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence, vanep, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence, OsherD, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence, donstockbauer, 2006/02/18
Re: GOD=G_uv SO, HOW NUMB IS PHYSICS, George Hammond, 2006/02/13
- Re: GOD=G_uv SO, HOW NUMB IS PHYSICS, George Hammond, 2006/02/14
MDT Theory to Replace Dying String Theory With Simple Postulate: The Fourth Dimension Is Expanding Relative to the Three Spatial Dimensions, drelliot, 2006/02/13
- Re: MDT Theory to Replace Dying String Theory With Simple Postulate: The Fourth Dimension Is Expanding Relative to the Three Spatial Dimensions, Bill Hobba, 2006/02/13
- Re: MDT Theory to Replace Dying String Theory With Simple Postulate: The Fourth Dimension Is Expanding Relative to the Three Spatial Dimensions, Immortalist, 2006/02/14
MDT Theory to Replace Dying String Theory With Simple Postulate: The Foruth Dimension Is Expanding Relative to the Three Spatial Dimensions, drelliot, 2006/02/13
the ultimate Internet spying technique-- cameras in software, a_plutonium, 2006/02/13
- Re: the ultimate Internet spying technique-- cameras in software, a_plutonium, 2006/02/15
  - Re: the ultimate Internet spying technique-- cameras in software, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/15
    - Re: the ultimate Internet spying technique-- cameras in software, donstockbauer, 2006/02/15
Article: Life inside a black hole, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2006/02/13
- Re: Article: Life inside a black hole, rolandberry, 2006/02/13
- Re: Article: Life inside a black hole, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Article: Life inside a black hole, ma1ibu, 2006/02/13
    - Re: Article: Life inside a black hole, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/13
    - Re: Article: Life inside a black hole, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Article: Life inside a black hole, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/14
- Re: Article: Life inside a black hole, hanson, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Article: Life inside a black hole, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/13
- Re: Article: Life inside a black hole, Don Carluci, 2006/02/13
Let's cut our lawns relatively, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
- Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
    - Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively, PD, 2006/02/13
- Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/13
- Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/14
  - Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
New Article on GA and Schrödinger, R.Aparicio, 2006/02/13
Re: The Two Envelopes Paradox, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/02/13
- Re: The Two Envelopes Paradox, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/02/13
3500+ ITEMS WHOLESALE TO THE PUBLIC--NAMEBRANDS--CHECK THIS OUT, estore, 2006/02/13
"Corrections to Special Relativity", Emoh, 2006/02/13
Nuclear spin, sebire, 2006/02/13
1BluePlanet .com Worldwide Great Things, 1blueplanet.com, 2006/02/13
Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/13
- Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, donstockbauer, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/13
- Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Bob Cain, 2006/02/14
    - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Bob Cain, 2006/02/14
- Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, PD, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/13
    - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Randy Poe, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, tadchem, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Y.Porat, 2006/02/14
    - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Y.Porat, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Y.Porat, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Y.Porat, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/15
- Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, tadchem, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Y.Porat, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, donstockbauer, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Y.Porat, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, tadchem, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Y.Porat, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, tadchem, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, tadchem, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Y.Porat, 2006/02/23
    - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, tadchem, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Y.Porat, 2006/02/22
  - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, tadchem, 2006/02/21
- Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, Randy Poe, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?, kumar, 2006/02/21
GET FREE CELL PHONES and CAMERA PHONES!, ssgg, 2006/02/13
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, February 13, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2006/02/13
Causation: Light Cone Causality vs Probable Influence, OsherD, 2006/02/13
- Re: Causation: Light Cone Causality vs Probable Influence, OsherD, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Causation: Light Cone Causality vs Probable Influence, OsherD, 2006/02/13
    - Universe Opposed In Triplicate, G. L. Bradford, 2006/02/13
Time having four dimensions, Anders, 2006/02/13
- Re: Time having four dimensions, Anders, 2006/02/13
Unit conversion, what a nightmare, Angel, 2006/02/13
- Re: Unit conversion, what a nightmare, FrediFizzx, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Unit conversion, what a nightmare, John Schutkeker, 2006/02/14
    - Re: Unit conversion, what a nightmare, FrediFizzx, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Unit conversion, what a nightmare, John Schutkeker, 2006/02/15
Re: serious question on Australian scientists, donstockbauer, 2006/02/12
LASER DOCUMENTARY, Larry, 2006/02/12
- Re: LASER DOCUMENTARY, John Schutkeker, 2006/02/14
Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
- Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, OG, 2006/02/12
  - Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
    - Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/12
      
      Message not available
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Message not available
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Message not available
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Message not available
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, tdp1001, 2006/02/12
    - Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, OG, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/12
- Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/12
  - Message not available
    - Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, brad, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
- Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
    - Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Greg Neill, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, PD, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, PD, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, PD, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
Energy Mass Conversion, Quantum_Ranger, 2006/02/12
- Re: Energy Mass Conversion, Borne, 2006/02/12
  - Re: Energy Mass Conversion, Quantum_Ranger, 2006/02/14
Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
- Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/12
  - Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
    - Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/12
      
      Message not available
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Message not available
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Creighton Hogg, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Creighton Hogg, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Creighton Hogg, 2006/02/13
      
      Message not available
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Creighton Hogg, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Message not available
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
- Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
    - Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, Bob Cain, 2006/02/14
- Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, tj Frazir, 2006/02/27
- Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, tj Frazir, 2006/02/27
  - Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, T Wake, 2006/02/27
- Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???, tj Frazir, 2006/02/28
Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Greysky, 2006/02/12
- Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/12
  - Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/13
- Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Stan Liou, 2006/02/14
  - Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Stan Liou, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Andreas Most, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Stan Liou, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Andreas Most, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Stan Liou, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, donstockbauer, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Stan Liou, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Stan Liou, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Andreas Most, 2006/02/18
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Andreas Most, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, hanson, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Andreas Most, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/22
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Andreas Most, 2006/02/22
      
      Message not available
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, hanson, 2006/02/22
      
      Message not available
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Andreas Most, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Andreas Most, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Bilge, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Bilge, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Bilge, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Andreas Most, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Bilge, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Andreas Most, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Bob Cain, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Bilge, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Koobee Wublee, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, brian a m stuckless, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Bilge, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/19
- Re: Antigravity Beams_ The exact solution to Einstins' relativistic field equation, Relastic, 2006/02/15
Endless dialectic, donstockbauer, 2006/02/12
- Re: Endless dialectic, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
  - Re: Endless dialectic, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/12
  - Re: Endless dialectic, Hero . van . Jindelt, 2006/02/12
    - Re: Endless dialectic, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
- Re: Endless dialectic, Jim Black, 2006/02/12
- Re: Endless dialectic, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/02/13
Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity, jollyrogership, 2006/02/12
- Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity, Traveler, 2006/02/12
  - Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity, Immortalist, 2006/02/12
  - Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity, jollyrogership, 2006/02/12
    - Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity, donstockbauer, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity, Immortalist, 2006/02/12
  - Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity, hanson, 2006/02/13
    - Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity, Traveler, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
- Re: Godel's Block Universe Paradox Resolved, MDT's Unification of QM and Relativity, G. Hobba, 2006/02/12
Moving Dimensions Theory (MDT) Shows that Action-At-A-Distance (quantum mechanics) and E=mc^2 (relativity) derive from the same underlying principle: the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions, jollyrogership, 2006/02/12
"Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Ecuas, 2006/02/12
Re: GET RID OF ALL GOLD SHARES WHILE YOU CAN, donstockbauer, 2006/02/12
Sliding and rolling, Nothx, 2006/02/12
- Re: Sliding and rolling, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/12
autonomic perpetuum mobile transformer by dedanoe, dedanoe, 2006/02/12
- Re: autonomic perpetuum mobile transformer by dedanoe, dedanoe, 2006/02/12
Balloon Question, learningmagic, 2006/02/12
- Re: Balloon Question, Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/12
Every Carbon atom is a galaxy., ma1ibu, 2006/02/12
- Re: Every Carbon atom is a galaxy., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/12
  - Re: Every Carbon atom is a galaxy., ma1ibu, 2006/02/12
    - Re: Every Carbon atom is a galaxy., Zebsky, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Every Carbon atom is a galaxy., ma1ibu, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Every Carbon atom is a galaxy., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/12
- Re: Every Carbon atom is a galaxy., Sam Wormley, 2006/02/12
The Spaceman Emulator, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/11
- Re: The Spaceman Emulator, Spaceman, 2006/02/11
  - Re: The Spaceman Emulator, Rock Brentwood, 2006/02/16
Rating System on sci.physics Should Be Interpreted in Reverse, OsherD, 2006/02/11
- Re: Rating System on sci.physics Should Be Interpreted in Reverse, OsherD, 2006/02/11
  - Re: Rating System on sci.physics Should Be Interpreted in Reverse, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/11
    - Re: Rating System on sci.physics Should Be Interpreted in Reverse, OsherD, 2006/02/12
OD Summery #1, Sulayman, 2006/02/11
- Re: OD Summery #1, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/12
  - Re: OD Summery #1, Richard Herring, 2006/02/13
Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 5: Alternating Series, OsherD, 2006/02/11
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 5: Alternating Series, OsherD, 2006/02/11
The Simple Proof Of The Existence Of God, S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/11
- Re: The Simple Proof Of The Existence Of God, S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/11
  - Re: The Simple Proof Of The Existence Of God, S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/12
    - Re: The Simple Proof Of The Existence Of God, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/12
PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY, ACE, 2006/02/11
Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/11
- Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., Milan, 2006/02/11
  - Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/11
  - Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., Lester Zick, 2006/02/12
- Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., abe . buckingham, 2006/02/11
  - Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/11
    - Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., Curt Welch, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., G. L. Bradford, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/19
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., Wolf Kirchmeir, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., Wolf Kirchmeir, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., dietrich . heese . boutin, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., Axel Harvey, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., donstockbauer, 2006/02/20
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/21
- Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., Mitch Perkins, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/21
    - Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., Mitch Perkins, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., platopes, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., G. L. Bradford, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., G. L. Bradford, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Observability of dimension is restricted. Paradox is a naturally occuring phenomena., RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/25
Milky Way and Andromeda clusters in two planes prove Galaxy Model for the Atom is correct., ma1ibu, 2006/02/11
- Re: Milky Way and Andromeda clusters in two planes prove Galaxy Model for the Atom is correct., Sam Wormley, 2006/02/11
  - Re: Milky Way and Andromeda clusters in two planes prove Galaxy Model for the Atom is correct., ma1ibu, 2006/02/11
- Re: Milky Way and Andromeda clusters in two planes prove Galaxy Model for the Atom is correct., ma1ibu, 2006/02/11
Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 4: Elliptic Curves, OsherD, 2006/02/11
UPPER-BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CHESS!!!!!, NILS BÖRJESSON, 2006/02/11
- Re: UPPER-BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CHESS!!!!!, tadchem, 2006/02/11
- Re: UPPER-BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CHESS!!!!!, Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/12
- UPPER-BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CHESS!!!!!, NILS BÖRJESSON, 2006/02/11
  - Re: UPPER-BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CHESS!!!!!, tadchem, 2006/02/12
    - Re: UPPER-BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CHESS!!!!!, donstockbauer, 2006/02/12
Re: REED AND WEEP -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design, donstockbauer, 2006/02/11
- Re: REED AND WEEP -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design, tadchem, 2006/02/11
- Re: REED AND WEEP -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design, jgreimer, 2006/02/11
MOving Dimensions Theory's Beauty is Rooted in a Simple Postulate: The Fourth Dimension IS Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions: String Theory Has No Postulates, drelliot, 2006/02/11
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory's Beauty is Rooted in a Simple Postulate: The Fourth Dimension IS Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions: String Theory Has No Postulates, drelliot, 2006/02/11
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory's Beauty is Rooted in a Simple Postulate: The Fourth Dimension IS Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions: String Theory Has No Postulates, G. Hobba, 2006/02/11
Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for Action At A Distance, Unifies GR & SR With QM, and Renders String Theory Unnecessary http://physicsmathforums.com, drelliot, 2006/02/11
Re: Better scientists can see it... it's a very adult topic., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/11
Re: proving Kepler Packing and 4 Color Mapping using the same technique of Smallest Member, boson boss, 2006/02/11
- Re: proving Kepler Packing and 4 Color Mapping using the same technique of Smallest Member, boson boss, 2006/02/13
Point of Inquiry: Richard Dawkins - The Root of All Evil?, pointofinquiry, 2006/02/11
Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 3: Conditional Probability vs Scheme, OsherD, 2006/02/11
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 3: Conditional Probability vs Scheme, OsherD, 2006/02/11
  - Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 3: Conditional Probability vs Scheme, OsherD, 2006/02/11
GTR gets a new life!!!!, tdp1001, 2006/02/11
A Category is Only Allowed Once in Physic's Physical Theory, Douglas Eagleson, 2006/02/11
"The Flaw in High Energy Physics", Ecuas, 2006/02/11
THE LIE OF "FIRST" PEARL HARBOR -- FDR, Meet GWB -- 911 ., Ed Conrad, 2006/02/11
- Re: THE LIE OF "FIRST" PEARL HARBOR -- FDR, Meet GWB -- 911 ., donstockbauer, 2006/02/11
  - Re: THE LIE OF "FIRST" PEARL HARBOR -- FDR, Meet GWB -- 911 ., The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/11
Supply 2 Pole,3 Pole Gas Tube Surge Arresters,Gas Discharge Tube,(Ceramic Surge Arresters, samul888, 2006/02/11
Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 2: PI vs Scheme, OsherD, 2006/02/11
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 2: PI vs Scheme, OsherD, 2006/02/11
  - Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 2: PI vs Scheme, OsherD, 2006/02/11
    - Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 2: PI vs Scheme, OsherD, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 2: PI vs Scheme, OsherD, 2006/02/11
The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread., Spaceman, 2006/02/10
- Re: The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/11
  - Re: The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread., Spaceman, 2006/02/11
    - Re: The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread., kdthrge, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread., Spaceman, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread., Eric Gisse, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread., Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/12
10 nanometressilicon... efficient... provided their surfaces are clean, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
- Re: 10 nanometressilicon... efficient... provided their surfaces are clean, hanson, 2006/02/10
bicycle question - real life event, Andy Gee, 2006/02/10
- Re: bicycle question - real life event, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/10
  - Re: bicycle question - real life event, Martin Hogbin, 2006/02/11
    - Re: bicycle question - real life event, tj Frazir, 2006/02/11
    - Re: bicycle question - real life event, tj Frazir, 2006/02/11
      
      tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier, hanson, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier, tj Frazir, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier, T Wake, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier, tj Frazir, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier, tj Frazir, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier, tj Frazir, 2006/02/13
- Re: bicycle question - real life event, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
- Re: bicycle question - real life event, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/11
  - Re: bicycle question - real life event, Andy Gee, 2006/02/11
- Re: bicycle question - real life event, Ken Muldrew, 2006/02/13
  - Re: bicycle question - real life event, tj Frazir, 2006/02/13
Re: Home page for Model Mechanics, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
- Re: Home page for Model Mechanics, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Home page for Model Mechanics, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Feb 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Feb 06 Washington, DC, hanson, 2006/02/10
  - Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Feb 06 Washington, DC, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/11
Caroline Thompson Passed Away, nightlight, 2006/02/10
- Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away, Traveler, 2006/02/10
- Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away, srp, 2006/02/10
- Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away, Bruce Scott TOK, 2006/02/13
    - Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away, nightlight, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away, Traveler, 2006/02/13
- Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away, I.Vecchi, 2006/02/14
- Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away, tj Frazir, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away, T Wake, 2006/02/14
Gravity of gaseous planets, spin9, 2006/02/10
- Re: Gravity of gaseous planets, Greg Neill, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Gravity of gaseous planets, spin9, 2006/02/10
- Re: Gravity of gaseous planets, Bruce Scott TOK, 2006/02/13
MIchael Faraday's disovoery, moa, 2006/02/10
- Re: MIchael Faraday's disovoery, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/10
- Re: MIchael Faraday's disovoery, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/10
  - Re: MIchael Faraday's disovoery, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/10
    - Re: MIchael Faraday's disovoery, moa, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: MIchael Faraday's disovoery, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/10
- Re: MIchael Faraday's disovoery, jean-marie, 2006/02/16
This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), John Baez, 2006/02/10
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), Hexenmeister, 2006/02/11
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), John Baez, 2006/02/12
  - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), Phil Carmody, 2006/02/12
  - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), tolgabozkaya, 2006/02/12
    - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), John Baez, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), tolgabozkaya, 2006/02/14
  - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), John Baez, 2006/02/13
    - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), tolgabozkaya, 2006/02/14
- Unknowns make life, gravity and photons seem like a casino., Jeff_℞elf, 2006/02/13
Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity"), zutalors212, 2006/02/10
- Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity"), Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
- Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity"), James Copeland, 2006/02/10
- Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity"), Jim Black, 2006/02/11
- Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity"), Sam Wormley, 2006/02/11
  - Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity"), The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/12
    - Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity"), Sam Wormley, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity"), The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity"), Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, PD, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, PD, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, PD, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Rock Brentwood, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Greg Neill, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, PD, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations, Spaceman, 2006/02/16
- Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity"), PD, 2006/02/14
Question on Atomac Mass, William Hightower, 2006/02/10
- Re: Question on Atomac Mass, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Question on Atomac Mass, William Hightower, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Question on Atomac Mass, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Question on Atomac Mass, Greg Neill, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Question on Atomac Mass, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Question on Atomac Mass, arvee, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Question on Atomac Mass, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Question on Atomac Mass, arvee, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Question on Atomac Mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Question on Atomac Mass, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/10
- Re: Question on Atomac Mass, OG, 2006/02/10
- Re: Question on Atomac Mass, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Question on Atomac Mass, William Hightower, 2006/02/10
Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer, onehappymadman, 2006/02/10
- Re: Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer, Droctor, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer, onehappymadman, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer, onehappymadman, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer, tadchem, 2006/02/10
- Re: Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/11
Some astronomical "force" constant questions, dgoldsmith_89, 2006/02/10
- Re: Some astronomical "force" constant questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Some astronomical "force" constant questions, dgoldsmith_89, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Some astronomical "force" constant questions, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Some astronomical "force" constant questions, dgoldsmith_89, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Some astronomical "force" constant questions, tadchem, 2006/02/10
- Re: Some astronomical "force" constant questions, Jim Black, 2006/02/11
  - Re: Some astronomical "force" constant questions, dgoldsmith_89, 2006/02/12
the reference frame of your own equilibrium point, dedanoe, 2006/02/10
Lighter Cars Not Necessarily Riskier, Physicists Say, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
- Re: Lighter Cars Not Necessarily Riskier, Physicists Say, MushnickA, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Lighter Cars Not Necessarily Riskier, Physicists Say, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Lighter Cars Not Necessarily Riskier, Physicists Say, Droctor, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Lighter Cars Not Necessarily Riskier, Physicists Say, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Lighter Cars Not Necessarily Riskier, Physicists Say, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/10
- Re: Lighter Cars Not Necessarily Riskier, Physicists Say, Matthew Lybanon, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Lighter Cars Not Necessarily Riskier, Physicists Say, Droctor, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Lighter Cars Not Necessarily Riskier, Physicists Say, Matthew Lybanon, 2006/02/10
- Re: Lighter Cars Not Necessarily Riskier, Physicists Say, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/11
"Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", Ecuas, 2006/02/10
Time traveler song, fucua Ya mommaa, 2006/02/10
Time and entropy, Don1, 2006/02/10
- Re: Time and entropy, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Time and entropy, Don1, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Time and entropy, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Time and entropy, Two, 2006/02/18
- Re: Time and entropy, PD, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Time and entropy, Don1, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Time and entropy, jonathan, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Time and entropy, Allan Murray, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Time and entropy, jonathan, 2006/02/11
    - Re: Time and entropy, Steve Pope, 2006/02/10
- Re: Time and entropy, Allan Murray, 2006/02/11
- Re: Time and entropy, Two, 2006/02/18
- Re: Time and entropy, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/19
Thermodynamics, Doune60, 2006/02/10
- Re: Thermodynamics, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/10
- Re: Thermodynamics, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Thermodynamics, Doune60, 2006/02/10
- Re: Thermodynamics, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/13
  - Re: Thermodynamics, Doune, 2006/02/13
    - Re: Thermodynamics, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Doune, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/17
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Doune, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Doune, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/15
    - Re: Thermodynamics, PD, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Doune, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, PD, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Doune, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Doune, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Doune, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Thermodynamics, Doune, 2006/02/16
Spinning cube question, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/10
- Re: Spinning cube question, Bruce Scott TOK, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Spinning cube question, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Spinning cube question, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Spinning cube question, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Spinning cube question, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/11
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Spinning cube question, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Spinning cube question, Spaceman, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Spinning cube question, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Spinning cube question, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Spinning cube question, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Spinning cube question, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Spinning cube question, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Spinning cube question, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Spinning cube question, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/11
- Re: Spinning cube question, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Spinning cube question, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Spinning cube question, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
- Re: Spinning cube question, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology, OsherD, 2006/02/10
- Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology, Gottshium, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology, OsherD, 2006/02/11
Google usenet post rating system, tdp1001, 2006/02/10
- Re: Google usenet post rating system, tadchem, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Google usenet post rating system, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/10
- Re: Google usenet post rating system, T Wake, 2006/02/11
  - Re: Google usenet post rating system, tdp1001, 2006/02/11
    - Re: Google usenet post rating system, T Wake, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, Richard Herring, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, tdp1001, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, Richard Herring, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, tdp1001, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, tdp1001, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, tdp1001, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, tdp1001, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, tdp1001, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, Richard Herring, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, tdp1001, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, Richard Herring, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, tdp1001, 2006/02/15
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, Richard Herring, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, tdp1001, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, Richard Herring, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, tdp1001, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, Richard Herring, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/16
      
      Re: Google usenet post rating system, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/16
- Re: Google usenet post rating system, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/02/13
Researchers in Israel have built a system that can create lightning balls, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/09
- Re: Researchers in Israel have built a system that can create lightning balls, Bruce Scott TOK, 2006/02/10
- Re: Researchers in Israel have built a system that can create lightning balls, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Researchers in Israel have built a system that can create lightning balls, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Researchers in Israel have built a system that can create lightning balls, Jan Panteltje, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Researchers in Israel have built a system that can create lightning balls, RP, 2006/02/10
What is your Favoite Crackpot Theory? M-Theory? String Theory? Who is Your Favorite Crackpot? Witten? Greene? Lubos?, jollyrogership, 2006/02/09
- Re: What is your Favoite Crackpot Theory? M-Theory? String Theory? Who is Your Favorite Crackpot? Witten? Greene? Lubos?, Bret Cahill, 2006/02/09
  - Re: What is your Favoite Crackpot Theory? M-Theory? String Theory? Who is Your Favorite Crackpot? Witten? Greene? Lubos?, Robert Cohen, 2006/02/10
- Re: What is your Favoite Crackpot Theory? M-Theory? String Theory? Who is Your Favorite Crackpot? Witten? Greene? Lubos?, Julian, 2006/02/10
- Re: What is your Favoite Crackpot Theory? M-Theory? String Theory? Who is Your Favorite Crackpot? Witten? Greene? Lubos?, Julian, 2006/02/10
Definition of moment of inertia wrong?, Jason Stanidge, 2006/02/09
- Re: Definition of moment of inertia wrong?, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/10
- Re: Definition of moment of inertia wrong?, Rock Brentwood, 2006/02/22
Help with mechanics problem, Joachim, 2006/02/09
- Re: Help with mechanics problem, Randy Poe, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Help with mechanics problem, Joachim, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Help with mechanics problem, Andy Resnick, 2006/02/13
Differentiation problem with vectors and matrices., Dougal McDougal of that Elk, 2006/02/09
need chemical, thermodynamic, transport, or critical properties?, Btunde, 2006/02/09
Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Greg Neill, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Greg Neill, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Greg Neill, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
- Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Is creating a standard measurement of distance ok by using a speed for such?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/10
ch4, ma1ibu, 2006/02/09
- Re: ch4, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/09
  - Re: ch4, ma1ibu, 2006/02/09
Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/11
      
      Message not available
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, OG, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/12
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Message not available
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/14
      
      Message not available
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/13
- Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/11
  - Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/11
    - Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Greg Neill, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099, Spaceman, 2006/02/11
Re: Solar Ovens, cnctut, 2006/02/09
Call for Space Tourism Wiki Volunteers, www.NewVoyageNews.com, 2006/02/09
- Call for Space Tourism Wiki Volunteers, www.NewVoyageNews.com, 2006/02/09
Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Traveler, 2006/02/09
- Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Traveler, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Traveler, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Lynette, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Traveler, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, hanson, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Traveler, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Bilge, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Traveler, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Bilge, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, hanson, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/13
- Re: Time Travel Article on Slashdot. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha, Autymn D. C., 2006/02/13
Double slit experiment confusion, GeordieSi, 2006/02/09
- Re: Double slit experiment confusion, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/02/19
  - Re: Double slit experiment confusion, GeordieSi, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Double slit experiment confusion, FAX, 2006/02/20
    - Re: Double slit experiment confusion, Peter, 2006/02/21
      
      Re: Double slit experiment confusion, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/02/24
      
      Re: Double slit experiment confusion, Peter, 2006/02/26
- Re: Double slit experiment confusion, RP, 2006/02/21
  - Re: Double slit experiment confusion, GeordieSi, 2006/02/22
    - Re: Double slit experiment confusion, RP, 2006/02/22
My Swimming Battery Design- Inter-Design, Douglas Eagleson, 2006/02/09
My Quantum Dot Computer Simulator, Douglas Eagleson, 2006/02/09
The M n M experiment, MobyDikc, 2006/02/09
- Re: The M n M experiment, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/02/09
- Re: The M n M experiment, G. Hobba, 2006/02/09
  - Re: The M n M experiment, MobyDikc, 2006/02/10
    - Re: The M n M experiment, G. Hobba, 2006/02/10
  - Re: The M n M experiment, Don Carluci, 2006/02/10
- Re: The M n M experiment, Henri Wilson, 2006/02/15
  - Re: The M n M experiment, Tolga Bozkaya, 2006/02/15
  - Re: The M n M experiment, Paul B. Andersen, 2006/02/21
    - Re: The M n M experiment, Henri Wilson, 2006/02/23
      
      Re: The M n M experiment, Paul B. Andersen, 2006/02/24
      
      BaTh and fiber optic gyroscopes, Tom Roberts, 2006/02/25
      
      Re: BaTh and fiber optic gyroscopes, Henri Wilson, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: BaTh and fiber optic gyroscopes, Jerry, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: BaTh and fiber optic gyroscopes, Jerry, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: BaTh and fiber optic gyroscopes, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/26
      
      Re: BaTh and fiber optic gyroscopes, Henri Wilson, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: BaTh and fiber optic gyroscopes, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: BaTh and fiber optic gyroscopes, Jerry, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: BaTh and fiber optic gyroscopes, Paul B. Andersen, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: BaTh and fiber optic gyroscopes, Henri Wilson, 2006/02/27
      
      Re: BaTh and fiber optic gyroscopes, Tom Roberts, 2006/02/28
- Re: The M n M experiment, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/15
  - Re: The M n M experiment, Henri Wilson, 2006/02/16
- Re: The M n M experiment, tadchem, 2006/02/23
Looking for arXiv endorsement, MobyDikc, 2006/02/09
- Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, MobyDikc, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, MobyDikc, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, MobyDikc, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/09
- Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, MobyDikc, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, MobyDikc, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, MobyDikc, 2006/02/13
      
      Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/13
"Gravity", Ecuas, 2006/02/09
- "Gravity", Etis, 2006/02/25
Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/09
- Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism, hanson, 2006/02/10
A Test Question- Category Implication, Douglas Eagleson, 2006/02/09
- Re: A Test Question- Category Implication, Douglas Eagleson, 2006/02/09
quesetino about ion 'beams', bobrich, 2006/02/09
- Re: quesetino about ion 'beams', Ian Parker, 2006/02/09
  - Re: quesetino(?) about ion 'beams', bobrich, 2006/02/10
    - Re: quesetino(?) about ion 'beams', Ian Parker, 2006/02/11
Physics: How break lead in mechanical pencil?, David Peters, 2006/02/09
- Re: Physics: How break lead in mechanical pencil?, Marcelo Zimmer, 2006/02/09
- Re: Physics: How break lead in mechanical pencil?, PD, 2006/02/10
The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, James Spear, 2006/02/09
Mental Abuse, medicaldevicetragedy, 2006/02/09
- Re: Mental Abuse, ma1ibu, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Mental Abuse, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Mental Abuse, Richard Herring, 2006/02/10
  - Re: Mental Abuse, MushnickA, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Mental Abuse, RadicalLibertarian, 2006/02/11
Algebraic Geometry and Algebraic Topology in Physics Pro-and-Con Critique 5.1 The Doctorows Return in Early 1990s, OsherD, 2006/02/09
Complexity in physics, Anders, 2006/02/09
- Re: Complexity in physics, Anders, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Complexity in physics, Anders, 2006/02/09
unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?, i . love . jeevitha, 2006/02/08
- Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
  - Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?, i . love . jeevitha, 2006/02/08
    - Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?, i . love . jeevitha, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?, i . love . jeevitha, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?, Greg Neill, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?, i . love . jeevitha, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/09
- Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?, Hexenmeister, 2006/02/11
Re: Algebraic Geometry and Algebraic Topology in Physics Pro-and-Con Critique 5: The Atiyah-Jaffe Controversy, OsherD, 2006/02/08
- Re: Algebraic Geometry and Algebraic Topology in Physics Pro-and-Con Critique 5: The Atiyah-Jaffe Controversy, OsherD, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Algebraic Geometry and Algebraic Topology in Physics Pro-and-Con Critique 5: The Atiyah-Jaffe Controversy, OsherD, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Algebraic Geometry and Algebraic Topology in Physics Pro-and-Con Critique 5: The Atiyah-Jaffe Controversy, OsherD, 2006/02/09
McHeisenberg Uncertainty, Mac, 2006/02/08
Past Discussions About The Smart Model And God, S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/08
- Re: Past Discussions About The Smart Model And God, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
- Re: Past Discussions About The Smart Model And God, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Past Discussions About The Smart Model And God, S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Past Discussions About The Smart Model And God, S. Enterprize Company, 2006/02/10
Algebraic Geometry and Algebraic Topology in Physics Pro-and-Con Critique 4: Investigation of arXiv and Front, OsherD, 2006/02/08
- Re: Algebraic Geometry and Algebraic Topology in Physics Pro-and-Con Critique 4: Investigation of arXiv and Front, OsherD, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Algebraic Geometry and Algebraic Topology in Physics Pro-and-Con Critique 4: Investigation of arXiv and Front, OsherD, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Algebraic Geometry and Algebraic Topology in Physics Pro-and-Con Critique 4: Investigation of arXiv and Front, OsherD, 2006/02/08
Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/08
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/10
    - Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Eric Gisse, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Eric Gisse, 2006/02/08
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), OG, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Greg Neill, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Greg Neill, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Sam Wormley, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Sam Wormley, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Greg Neill, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Greg Neill, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Greg Neill, 2006/02/11
    - Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), OG, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), Spaceman, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), OG, 2006/02/09
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099), PD, 2006/02/09
QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/08
- Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, physicsboy, 2006/02/08
  - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/08
    - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, physicsboy, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/08
    - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, mmeron, 2006/02/08
- Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, Greg Neill, 2006/02/08
  - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, gianguido . cianci, 2006/02/08
    - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, gianguido . cianci, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/09
  - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/08
    - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, mmeron, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, gianguido . cianci, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, gianguido . cianci, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, mmeron, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, gianguido . cianci, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, mmeron, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
    - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, gianguido . cianci, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/09
    - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, John C . Polasek, 2006/02/09
- Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, PD, 2006/02/09
  - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/09
    - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, gianguido . cianci, 2006/02/09
- Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, arvee, 2006/02/09
- Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/09
  - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
    - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, briggs, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, physicsboy, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/10
    - Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, gianguido . cianci, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, BD, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, gianguido . cianci, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: QUESTION - establishment of units of measurement, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
Gravitational Field, madscientist5500, 2006/02/08
- Re: Gravitational Field, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Gravitational Field, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Creighton Hogg, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Creighton Hogg, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Greg Neill, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Greg Neill, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, carlip-nospam, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Greg Neill, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Spaceman, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, carlip-nospam, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/10
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/09
      
      Message not available
      Re: Gravitational Field, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Gravitational Field, briggs, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Traveler, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, ma1ibu, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, PD, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, PD, 2006/02/11
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Ken S. Tucker, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/14
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Spaceman, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, ma1ibu, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Greg Neill, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, physicsboy, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, Traveler, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Gravitational Field, PD, 2006/02/09
Calculating with Bose condensates?, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
the paradox of sch. society, dedanoe, 2006/02/08
semi-permeable membrane, Chrisd5000rouge, 2006/02/08
- Re: semi-permeable membrane, tadchem, 2006/02/08
kJ/g-atom, robertesimpson, 2006/02/08
- Re: kJ/g-atom, Puppet_Sock, 2006/02/08
  - Re: kJ/g-atom, robertesimpson, 2006/02/08
Photons and gravity, Anders, 2006/02/08
- Re: Photons and gravity, Spaceman, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Photons and gravity, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Photons and gravity, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Photons and gravity, Igor, 2006/02/09
- Re: Photons and gravity, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Photons and gravity, Anders, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Photons and gravity, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons and gravity, Schoenfeld, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons and gravity, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons and gravity, Igor, 2006/02/09
- Re: Photons and gravity, OG, 2006/02/08
Photons having mass, Anders, 2006/02/08
- Re: Photons having mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Photons having mass, Anders, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Photons having mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Y.Porat, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Photons having mass, PD, 2006/02/09
- Re: Photons having mass, Y.Porat, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Photons having mass, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Photons having mass, Y.Porat, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Photons having mass, hanson, 2006/02/19
- Re: Photons having mass, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Photons having mass, Anders, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Photons having mass, Randy Poe, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Spaceman, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Spaceman, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Spaceman, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Spaceman, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, PD, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Eric Gisse, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Photons having mass, briggs, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Anders, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, PD, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Y.Porat, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Photons having mass, PD, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Photons having mass, Y.Porat, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Photons having mass, PD, 2006/02/09
      
      Re: Photons having mass, carlip-nospam, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Photons having mass, PD, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Photons having mass, Anders, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Photons having mass, Anders, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Photons having mass, Anders, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Photons having mass, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Photons having mass, Anders, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Photons having mass, Anders, 2006/02/08
- Re: Photons having mass, FrediFizzx, 2006/02/08
- Re: Photons having mass, Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/08
- Re: Photons having mass, mmeron, 2006/02/08
Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., S D Rodrian, 2006/02/08
- Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., APOCALYPSE, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., Honest John, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., Wally Anglesea™, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., Wally Anglesea™, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., Timo Nieminen, 2006/02/08
  - Messages From The Future (was: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust.), Rock Brentwood, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/09
- Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., sdr, 2006/02/09
  - Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., Honest John, 2006/02/09
    - Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., Michael Baldwin Bruce, 2006/02/10
      
      Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., Honest John, 2006/02/10
- Re: Equating Mohammed Cartoons With The Holocaust., Hagar, 2006/02/09
Re: QM predictions ????, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/08
- Re: QM predictions ????, Y.Porat, 2006/02/08
Re: wires <=?=> pipes, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2006/02/08
"Communicating at Translight Velocities", Ecuas, 2006/02/08
Clocks and calendars, Don1, 2006/02/08
- Re: Clocks and calendars, Sam Wormley, 2006/02/08
- Re: Clocks and calendars, Smolley, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Clocks and calendars, Don1, 2006/02/08
- Re: Clocks and calendars, PD, 2006/02/08
Query for Gregory L. Hansen, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/08
- Re: Query for Gregory L. Hansen, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Query for Gregory L. Hansen, Richard Herring, 2006/02/08
    - Re: Query for Gregory L. Hansen, Gregory L. Hansen, 2006/02/08
      
      Re: Query for Gregory L. Hansen, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/11
    - Re: Query for Gregory L. Hansen, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/09
- Re: Query for Gregory L. Hansen, PD, 2006/02/08
  - Re: Query for Gregory L. Hansen, jmfbahciv, 2006/02/11
checking weight on a moving belt, Marcel, 2006/02/08
- Re: checking weight on a moving belt, Helmut Wabnig, 2006/02/08
- Re: checking weight on a movin