sci.physics (date)

sci.physics (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

January 31, 2006

The EINSTEIN-BOHR UNIVERSAL ABSOLUTE, JLee, 16:21
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, Timo Nieminen, 16:09
Measuring eyesight abilities and optics, Brablo, 16:04
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:55
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, kk, 15:46
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, sal, 15:30
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 15:03
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Bob Cain, 14:52
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Hexenmeister, 14:46
Re: A MINING PIONEER ANSWERS AN INSULTING AUSTRALIAN TOAD, donstockbauer, 14:34
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, pmlonline, 14:24
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, pmlonline, 14:14
Re: What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, JMA, 14:03
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 13:47
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, kk, 13:42
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 13:42
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Sam Wormley, 13:41
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Sam Wormley, 13:38
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 13:30
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Joe Fischer, 13:10
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., RP, 13:10
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.2: Time Travel Resurrected, Habib Salappa, 13:02
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Spaceman, 12:57
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 12:56
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 12:40
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 12:39
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:27
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Sam Wormley, 12:25
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Ian Parker, 12:25
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, srp, 12:22
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Spaceman, 12:18
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Hexenmeister, 11:51
Re: Color darker when wet, Hexenmeister, 11:42
Re: Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Hexenmeister, 11:31
Re: Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Hexenmeister, 11:29
Re: Einstein and Merlin, the fable & the legend, Hexenmeister, 11:26
Re: The Multidimensional Man, Mot Datrix, 11:02
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., oriel36, 10:56
The Multidimensional Man, jnadiaz, 10:55
Re: Howto build a poor mans nuclear hydrogen bomb, Mot Datrix, 10:51
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 20: Time As Diagonal Vector, DrDon Ablian., 10:46
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, John C . Randolph, 10:43
Howto build a poor mans nuclear hydrogen bomb, reactor1967@xxxxxxxxx, 10:40
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 10:18
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 10:13
Dimensional Analysis and Relativity, Retne, 10:11
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
Re: FTL communication, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 09:58
curses, kstocklmeir, 09:37
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, surrealistic-dream, 09:28
Re: can quantities have same "dimensions" but different "units", Richard Herring, 08:43
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, jmfbahciv, 08:35
Re: Gravity in game question., donstockbauer, 07:12
Re: INSIGHT IN THE TRUE GEOLOGY, donstockbauer, 07:02
Gravity in game question., terisquas, 07:01
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Y.Porat, 05:29
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, Ken S. Tucker, 05:20
Re: Color darker when wet, MKrojc, 04:36
Re: Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., mmeron, 04:00
Re: Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Paul B. Andersen, 03:58
Re: Physics experiment equipment - advice needed, Ceddie, 03:24
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Hexenmeister, 03:07
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 20: Time As Diagonal Vector, OsherD, 03:06
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Bob Cain, 03:03
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., The Ghost In The Machine, 03:00
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.2: Time Travel Resurrected, OsherD, 02:16
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.2: Time Travel Resurrected, OsherD, 02:12
Re: "The Arrow of Time", platopes, 02:08
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 20: Time As Diagonal Vector, OsherD, 02:00
Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 20: Time As Diagonal Vector, OsherD, 01:52
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Charles Francis, 01:51
Re: Physics experiment equipment - advice needed, PD, 01:43
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Don Kelly, 01:43
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Don Kelly, 01:37
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 01:31
Re: "The Arrow of Time" is more spam from Ernest Wittke, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 01:23
Re: Coulomb scattering cross-section., mmeron, 01:01
Re: FTL communication, Greysky, 00:59
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 00:56
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Timo Nieminen, 00:50
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 00:45
Re: "The Arrow of Time", Traveler, 00:26
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 00:18
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 00:00
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00

January 30, 2006

Re: Coulomb scattering cross-section., Timo Nieminen, 23:59
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Ken S. Tucker, 23:54
Re: Physics experiment equipment - advice needed, Sam Wormley, 23:47
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 23:47
Re: "The Arrow of Time", platopes, 23:46
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Traveler, 23:42
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., RP, 23:42
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 23:38
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 23:37
Physics experiment equipment - advice needed, Ceddie, 23:30
Re: What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:29
Re: Coulomb scattering cross-section., Gregory L. Hansen, 23:20
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Hexenmeister, 23:19
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:06
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., nitrofrost01, 22:50
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., nitrofrost01, 22:50
Re: What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, JMA, 22:45
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Hexenmeister, 22:44
Re: Work in mechanics vs. work in thermodynamics, PD, 22:44
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 22:34
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 22:29
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 22:25
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 22:22
Re: Coulomb scattering cross-section., Timo Nieminen, 22:15
Einstein and Merlin, the fable & the legend, hanson, 22:01
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Spaceman, 22:00
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 21:59
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Greg Neill, 21:52
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Greg Neill, 21:50
Re: "The Arrow of Time", Traveler, 21:47
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Sue..., 21:44
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 21:42
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 21:36
Re: "The Arrow of Time", Traveler, 21:30
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, JanPB, 21:22
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 21:17
Re: "The Arrow of Time", platopes, 21:16
Re: "The Arrow of Time", platopes, 21:13
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 21:07
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Bob Cain, 21:07
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Bob Cain, 21:06
Re: Signal/Noise Ratio, Mot Datrix, 21:04
Re: Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Hexenmeister, 21:01
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Hexenmeister, 20:53
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:35
Re: Signal/Noise Ratio, Mot Datrix, 20:34
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Traveler, 20:21
Re: Vibration in a brass plate question, mrjaune, 20:20
Re: Color darker when wet, platopes, 20:12
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., nitrofrost01, 20:12
curses, kstocklmeir, 20:02
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Chris, 19:34
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 19:17
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 19:15
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 19:10
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Hero . van . Jindelt, 19:09
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 19:05
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Bill Hobba, 18:56
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Greg Neill, 18:53
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Bill Hobba, 18:51
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 18:48
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 18:35
Coulomb scattering cross-section., Gregory L. Hansen, 18:27
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE --- Number 763 January 30, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, ma1ibu, 18:26
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 18:21
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 18:21
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 18:21
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 18:21
Re: "The Arrow of Time", G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:18
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, ma1ibu, 18:05
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Greg Neill, 17:57
Re: FTL communication, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:55
Re: More or Less Than the Sum of Its Parts, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:54
Re: Climate Expert Says NASA Tried to Silence Him, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:48
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 17:45
Re: ALL functions are continous!, tadchem, 17:26
Re: Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Paul B. Andersen, 17:20
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Greg Neill, 17:19
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, tadchem, 17:19
Re: FTL communication, Randy Poe, 17:17
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Greg Neill, 17:16
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Paul B. Andersen, 17:09
Re: FTL communication, Spaceman, 16:52
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 16:47
Re: FTL communication, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:44
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Rock Brentwood, 16:43
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, FrediFizzx, 16:43
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 16:40
Re: FTL communication, Spaceman, 16:28
Re: "The Arrow of Time", Traveler, 16:27
Re: FTL communication, Randy Poe, 16:21
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Greg Neill, 16:17
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Greg Neill, 16:06
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 16:06
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 16:01
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 15:57
Re: ALL functions are continous!, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:54
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Timo Nieminen, 15:39
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Greg Neill, 15:30
Re: "The Arrow of Time", Sam Wormley, 15:29
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:28
Re: FTL communication, Spaceman, 15:27
Re: FTL communication, Spaceman, 15:25
Re: FTL communication, Sam Wormley, 15:25
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Greg Neill, 15:23
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., PD, 15:23
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, Timo Nieminen, 15:14
Re: Does Mandelbrot/Julia duality reflect relativity/quantum duality?, Akira Bergman, 15:14
Re: FTL communication, Eric Gisse, 15:13
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 15:07
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 15:02
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 14:56
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., PD, 14:49
FTL communication, Spaceman, 14:48
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 14:46
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Greg Neill, 14:46
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Greg Neill, 14:42
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 14:40
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:38
Re: "The Arrow of Time", G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:32
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 14:29
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 14:26
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Puppet_Sock, 14:25
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 14:23
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:23
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., PD, 14:18
Re: "The Arrow of Time", Spaceman, 14:18
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 14:15
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Greg Neill, 14:15
Re: Color darker when wet, Timo Nieminen, 14:13
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 14:12
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Hero . van . Jindelt, 14:11
Signal/Noise Ratio, Ken S. Tucker, 14:11
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Timo Nieminen, 14:09
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Greg Neill, 14:04
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Spaceman, 14:02
Re: "The Arrow of Time", Greg Neill, 13:59
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Greg Neill, 13:56
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 13:56
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Timo Nieminen, 13:52
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., oriel36, 13:51
Re: "The Arrow of Time", Spaceman, 13:44
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., oriel36, 13:43
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE --- Number 763 January 30, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 13:41
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Hexenmeister, 13:36
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 13:36
Re: physical laws and the universe, donstockbauer, 13:31
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 13:29
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 13:26
Re: physical laws and the universe, Traveler, 13:24
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, sal, 13:21
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 13:19
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Timo Nieminen, 13:17
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, kk, 13:12
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., PD, 13:02
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Ken S. Tucker, 12:59
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:55
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Randy Poe, 12:54
Re: Vibration in a brass plate question, Mot Datrix, 12:51
Re: Color darker when wet, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:47
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 12:45
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Richard Herring, 12:43
Re: physical laws and the universe, PD, 12:43
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 12:42
Re: A sphere of light in GR by KST, Ken S. Tucker, 12:40
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 12:40
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 12:30
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 12:29
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:25
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 12:20
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 12:20
Re: Work in mechanics vs. work in thermodynamics, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:19
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:17
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 12:09
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:08
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 12:05
Re: physical laws and the universe, Traveler, 12:02
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
Re: Color darker when wet, Hexenmeister, 11:53
Re: Color darker when wet, MKrojc, 11:52
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 11:47
Re: Work in mechanics vs. work in thermodynamics, Mot Datrix, 11:41
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:32
Re: can quantities have same "dimensions" but different "units", Richard Herring, 11:31
Work in mechanics vs. work in thermodynamics, lgardner, 11:31
Re: Does Mandelbrot/Julia duality reflect relativity/quantum duality?, Mot Datrix, 11:26
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Bruce Scott TOK, 11:18
Re: A sphere of light in GR by KST, Bruce Scott TOK, 11:17
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 11:08
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 11:05
Re: What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:57
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 10:56
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:52
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 10:23
Re: Color darker when wet, platopes, 10:20
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Traveler, 10:11
Re: Color darker when wet, MKrojc, 10:06
Re: Skeptical shows on TV, Dr Don Abliean, 10:02
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.2: Time Travel Resurrected, Dr Don Abliean, 09:59
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 09:57
Re: physical laws and the universe, PD, 09:52
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.2: Time Travel Resurrected, Dr Don Abliean, 09:49
Re: "The Arrow of Time", Mike, 09:35
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.3: Why Infinite Speed, Dr. Don Abelian, 09:28
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, surrealistic-dream, 09:27
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, surrealistic-dream, 09:16
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Traveler, 09:16
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., PD, 09:05
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:02
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:01
curses, kstocklmeir, 09:00
Re: "The Arrow of Time", donstockbauer, 08:56
Re: Color darker when wet, Andy Resnick, 08:51
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Sam Wormley, 08:47
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, jmfbahciv, 08:44
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Sam Wormley, 08:44
"The Arrow of Time", Retne, 08:40
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, jmfbahciv, 08:34
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Harry, 07:57
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:11
Re: carbon dioxide ice on the earth?, penseur, 07:02
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Richard Herring, 06:59
Re: Color darker when wet, John Christiansen, 06:28
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 06:28
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 30, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:42
Re: ALL functions are continous!, Hexenmeister, 05:24
Color darker when wet, MKrojc, 05:17
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 04:23
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, John C . Randolph, 04:05
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Hero . van . Jindelt, 03:31
Re: Size as Direction, platopes, 03:02
Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.3: Why Infinite Speed, OsherD, 03:00
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, pmlonline, 02:41
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, platopes, 02:27
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), donstockbauer, 02:16
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, mmeron, 02:14
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, pmlonline, 02:02
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, FrediFizzx, 01:58
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Eric Gisse, 01:55
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Ilja Schmelzer, 01:16
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Don Kelly, 01:08
Re: ALL functions are continous!, helloworld, 01:05
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Bilge, 01:05
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Bill Hobba, 01:02
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.2: Time Travel Resurrected, OsherD, 01:01
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., RadicalLibertarian, 00:50
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.2: Time Travel Resurrected, OsherD, 00:30
Re: GUTS, brad, 00:23
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, pmlonline, 00:16
Re: Energy too cheap to meter, hanson, 00:11

January 29, 2006

Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 23:56
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 23:54
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 23:53
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 23:50
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., RadicalLibertarian, 23:49
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 23:44
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 23:44
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 23:40
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 23:38
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 23:34
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 23:32
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 23:26
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 23:19
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 23:18
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 23:18
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 23:00
Re: Humans are Becoming Genetically Less Intelligent???, Hexenmeister, 22:57
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 22:55
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 22:39
Re: Whare can I ask questions on quantum physics, FrediFizzx, 22:34
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., RP, 22:25
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 22:23
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 22:15
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Eric Gisse, 22:14
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 22:13
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 22:11
Re: What creates the Charge?, ma1ibu, 22:06
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 22:04
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Spaceman, 22:02
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 22:00
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., RadicalLibertarian, 21:56
Re: can quantities have same "dimensions" but different "units", Paul Cardinale, 21:47
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, JanPB, 21:46
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:43
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Paul Cardinale, 21:43
Re: ALL functions are continous!, Paul Cardinale, 21:36
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 21:25
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Traveler, 21:22
Derivate OF a number, NILS B�RJESSON, 21:05
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 21:03
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Eric Gisse, 21:01
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Hexenmeister, 20:51
Humans are Becoming Genetically Less Intelligent???, jasonchanamerican, 20:38
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), donstockbauer, 20:36
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., RadicalLibertarian, 20:29
Re: Energy too cheap to meter, donstockbauer, 20:29
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 20:24
Re: ALL functions are continous!, Gregory L. Hansen, 20:24
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 20:20
Re: Energy too cheap to meter, hanson, 20:19
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, hanson, 20:19
Re: Why not use glucose to power mobiles ?, hanson, 20:19
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Gregory L. Hansen, 20:19
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 20:11
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 20:05
Re: What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, JMA, 19:53
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, JMA, 19:53
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:52
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.2: Time Travel Resurrected, Spaceman, 19:45
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.2: Time Travel Resurrected, OsherD, 19:36
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Michael Varney, 19:36
ALL functions are continous!, NILS B�RJESSON, 19:30
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.2: Time Travel Resurrected, OsherD, 19:23
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 19:20
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 19:10
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 19:05
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., RadicalLibertarian, 19:03
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Mike, 18:55
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., PD, 18:53
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Gregory L. Hansen, 18:52
Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.2: Time Travel Resurrected, OsherD, 18:49
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.1: Two Time Directions continued, Spaceman, 18:20
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.1: Two Time Directions continued, OsherD, 18:13
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 18:11
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:59
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Bill Hobba, 17:56
Skeptical shows on TV, Robert, 17:51
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:48
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:47
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 17:29
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 17:14
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 17:13
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 17:11
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Sam Wormley, 17:07
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:05
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:53
Re: Borders Group Mind Control (Wenzlaff -- covert military), T Wake, 16:52
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 16:52
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Art Deco, 16:45
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 16:43
knowing your micro-macro cyclic self, dedanoe, 16:38
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, RP, 16:37
Re: time is money, dedanoe, 16:34
Re: what do you get by mixing all and nothing?, dedanoe, 16:33
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:29
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Eric Gisse, 16:17
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Eric Gisse, 16:15
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 16:15
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 16:07
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Eric Gisse, 16:06
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Eric Gisse, 16:03
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:01
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 15:57
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 15:56
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., RadicalLibertarian, 15:47
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:46
Re: Is our universe a brain?, Akira Bergman, 15:42
Borders Group Mind Control (Wenzlaff -- covert military), Laura, 15:42
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:41
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Double-A, 15:41
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:40
Re: A TRUE GEOLOGY INSIGHT, donstockbauer, 15:39
Re: Is our universe a brain?: FURTHER RESEARCH Needed?, Akira Bergman, 15:37
Re: Is our universe a brain?, Akira Bergman, 15:29
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Spaceman, 15:29
Re: Whare can I ask questions on quantum physics, T Wake, 15:27
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 15:17
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 15:17
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., oriel36, 15:17
Re: Vibration in a brass plate question, Charles Francis, 15:16
Re: Possible problems with Photon theory, pmlonline, 15:10
Re: A sphere of light in GR by KST, Ken S. Tucker, 15:06
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Timo Nieminen, 15:06
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Charles Francis, 15:02
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Charles Francis, 15:00
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, tadchem, 14:55
Re: Vibration in a brass plate question, mrjaune, 14:52
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 14:49
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 14:41
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 14:37
Possible problems with Photon theory, pmlonline, 14:35
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Timo Nieminen, 14:35
Re: proof of general travelling wave equation, srp, 14:32
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Greysky, 14:30
Re: Whare can I ask questions on quantum physics, Michael Varney, 14:16
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Michael Varney, 14:13
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 14:12
Whare can I ask questions on quantum physics, Tetsuji Maverick Rai, 14:06
Re: proof of general travelling wave equation, tadchem, 14:05
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 14:03
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 14:01
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 13:57
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Michael Varney, 13:57
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:53
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 13:46
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 13:35
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 13:20
"The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Evird, 13:14
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 13:13
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 13:12
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:04
Re: Article: Gravity theory dispenses with dark matter (HTML Post), Ken S. Tucker, 13:04
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 13:03
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
Re: proof of general travelling wave equation, Hexenmeister, 12:51
Re: curses, RadicalLibertarian, 12:51
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:40
proof of general travelling wave equation, gaya . patel, 12:38
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:34
Re: Article: Gravity theory dispenses with dark matter (HTML Post), Hexenmeister, 12:32
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 12:18
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.1: Two Time Directions continued, Spaceman, 12:16
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 12:15
Re: Vibration in a brass plate question, John Popelish, 12:13
Re: GUTS, Sam Wormley, 12:12
Re: what do you get by mixing all and nothing?, RadicalLibertarian, 12:03
Re: Is our universe a brain?, T Wake, 12:00
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Michael Varney, 11:56
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 11:54
Vibration in a brass plate question, mrjaune, 11:53
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 11:52
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Spaceman, 11:50
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Y.Porat, 11:49
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Michael Varney, 11:45
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 11:42
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 11:41
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 11:37
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 11:35
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 11:34
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 11:33
Re: Is our universe a brain?, Ian Parker, 11:32
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 11:31
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 11:30
Re: Are subatomic particles random?, Mark Martin, 11:21
Re: Is our universe a brain?: FURTHER RESEARCH Needed?, Dr Nanduri, 11:18
Re: Are subatomic particles random?, srp, 11:01
Re: Is our universe a brain?, ma1ibu, 10:42
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Aetherist, 10:38
Re: Are subatomic particles random?, RadicalLibertarian, 10:27
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, srp, 10:26
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, jmfbahciv, 10:23
Re: Are subatomic particles random?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:19
Re: GUTS, T Wake, 10:11
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:07
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:03
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:59
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:58
GUTS, brad, 09:42
God, kstocklmeir, 09:31
God, kstocklmeir, 09:29
curses, kstocklmeir, 09:27
curses, kstocklmeir, 09:26
Re: Why not use glucose to power mobiles ?, jmfbahciv, 09:20
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, jmfbahciv, 09:18
curses, kstocklmeir, 09:18
Re: Why not use glucose to power mobiles ?, Jan Panteltje, 09:01
Re: Why not use glucose to power mobiles ?, Rene Tschaggelar, 08:54
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, jmfbahciv, 08:39
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Traveler, 08:11
Re: MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY--IT'S SO OBVIOUS, AND THUS STRING THEORIST'S UTTERLY DETEST IT, Bret Cahill, 08:03
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Dirk Van de moortel, 08:02
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Traveler, 08:01
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Traveler, 07:59
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, jmfbahciv, 07:42
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, jmfbahciv, 07:35
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, T Wake, 06:37
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:32
Re: Energy too cheap to meter, donstockbauer, 06:24
Energy too cheap to meter, donstockbauer, 06:17
Re: Article: Gravity theory dispenses with dark matter (HTML Post), Charles Francis, 06:15
Re: ARe: THE RETURN OF THE BOOMERANG, donstockbauer, 05:53
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., oriel36, 05:45
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Hexenmeister, 05:22
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 05:16
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:08
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Eric Gisse, 04:55
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Schoenfeld, 04:12
Re: Is our universe a brain?, Akira Bergman, 04:10
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 04:01
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.1: Two Time Directions continued, OsherD, 03:53
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, mmeron, 03:51
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Michael Varney, 03:43
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Michael Varney, 03:39
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.1: Two Time Directions continued, OsherD, 03:29
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 03:29
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Martin Kowatsch, 03:27
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Hexenmeister, 03:15
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Hexenmeister, 03:14
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Hexenmeister, 03:14
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:53
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:51
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:46
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.1: Two Time Directions continued, OsherD, 02:44
Re: bouyancy force?, Hexenmeister, 02:33
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 02:25
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 02:24
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Hexenmeister, 02:20
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.1: Two Time Directions continued, OsherD, 02:12
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Hexenmeister, 02:11
Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.1: Two Time Directions continued, OsherD, 02:02
Re: An OWLS Reference --- HOOT HOOT!, Hexenmeister, 01:48
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Eric Gisse, 01:01
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Eric Gisse, 01:00
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Eric Gisse, 00:56
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., RadicalLibertarian, 00:18
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Bob Cain, 00:12
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Aage Andersen, 00:00

January 28, 2006

Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 23:56
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 23:53
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Joe Fischer, 23:52
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:35
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 23:32
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 23:30
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 23:08
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 23:03
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 23:00
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 23:00
Re: bouyancy force?, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 22:58
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 22:52
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), donstockbauer, 22:48
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 22:47
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 22:46
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 22:45
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 22:44
Re: bouyancy force?, Timo Nieminen, 22:42
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 22:38
Re: Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Sam Wormley, 22:33
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 22:31
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, sal, 22:30
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Eric Gisse, 22:28
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 22:25
Gedanken Experiment time (just for fun of course), Spaceman, 22:25
Re: bouyancy force?, Sam Wormley, 22:24
Are subatomic particles random?, thymaridas, 22:23
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 22:21
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 22:19
Re: bouyancy force?, Mot Datrix, 22:19
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Greg Neill, 22:17
Re: Is our universe a brain?, Akira Bergman, 22:13
Re: bouyancy force?, Greg Neill, 22:12
Civil War in Stanford University's Physics Department? Susskind vs. Laughlin, Jack Sarfatti, 22:11
Re: INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Joe Fischer, 22:10
Re: Advice about Spaceshit, Michael Varney, 21:58
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Eric Gisse, 21:52
Re: Advice about Spaceshit, donstockbauer, 21:50
bouyancy force?, LookSkywalker, 21:46
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Traveler, 21:44
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 21:41
Re: Is our universe a brain?, donstockbauer, 21:38
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., RadicalLibertarian, 21:32
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 21:28
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Bill Hobba, 21:27
Re: A sphere of light in GR by KST, Hexenmeister, 21:17
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 21:13
INCOMPETENT ROBERTS AND ERRORBARS, Hexenmeister, 20:55
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Bob Cain, 20:50
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Tom Roberts, 20:49
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Jerry, 20:36
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 20:28
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Richard Henry, 20:05
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, The Ghost In The Machine, 20:00
can quantities have same "dimensions" but different "units", kobu . selva, 19:58
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., dej4, 19:50
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Mark Martin, 19:19
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., heckuva, 19:17
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Aetherist, 19:12
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 19:11
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 19:08
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Tom Roberts, 19:06
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, heckuva, 19:05
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 19:01
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 18:57
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Bill Hobba, 18:56
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 18:53
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Gregory L. Hansen, 18:51
Re: Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Bill Hobba, 18:49
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 18:45
Star-Trek Physics vs. Real Physics, Traveler, 18:38
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, T Wake, 18:36
Re: Is our universe a brain?, T Wake, 18:34
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, RP, 18:33
Re: Advice about Spaceshit, Spaceman, 18:33
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Gregory L. Hansen, 18:32
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 18:30
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, T Wake, 18:28
Re: Advice about Spaceshit, Michael Varney, 18:26
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Michael Varney, 18:25
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 18:24
Re: MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY--IT'S SO OBVIOUS, AND THUS STRING THEORIST'S UTTERLY DETEST IT, Bill Hobba, 18:21
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 18:21
Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! David Duchovney of X-Files Fame to Play Brian Greene!!!!, Bill Hobba, 18:19
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 18:19
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 18:17
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 18:17
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 18:16
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Traveler, 18:15
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 18:13
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 18:10
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 18:09
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 18:07
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 18:05
Re: carbon dioxide ice on the earth?, Mark Martin, 18:04
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 18:04
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, heckuva, 18:03
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Eric Gisse, 18:02
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
Re: Is time dilation real?, The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 18:00
Re: carbon dioxide ice on the earth?, penseur, 17:57
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Mark Martin, 17:56
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 17:52
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Traveler, 17:52
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Eric Gisse, 17:49
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:48
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Jason Stanidge, 17:48
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Eric Gisse, 17:48
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:46
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Traveler, 17:46
Re: Advice about Spaceshit, Spaceman, 17:44
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 17:43
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Traveler, 17:33
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 17:33
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 17:32
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 17:31
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, FrediFizzx, 17:29
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Eric Gisse, 17:29
Re: Advice about Spaceshit, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:29
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., hurricane corina, 17:28
Re: Advice about Spaceshit, Eric Gisse, 17:28
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Eric Gisse, 17:26
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:25
Re: Advice about Spaceshit, Spaceman, 17:24
Advice about Spaceshit, Sam Wormley, 17:22
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 17:22
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 17:18
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Sam Wormley, 17:16
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Sam Wormley, 17:14
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:10
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 17:07
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 17:06
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:04
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Eric Gisse, 17:03
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Eric Gisse, 17:01
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:00
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Eric Gisse, 16:59
ScienPow - "Science of Power", ScienPow, 16:53
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:51
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., PD, 16:46
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 16:45
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 16:44
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:43
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Sam Wormley, 16:42
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 16:42
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Michael Varney, 16:39
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 16:39
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 16:38
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Spaceman, 16:38
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 16:34
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Sue..., 16:31
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Mark Martin, 16:28
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Traveler, 16:27
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 16:25
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 16:25
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 16:20
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 16:16
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 16:15
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 16:14
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Michael Varney, 16:12
Re: Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Sam Wormley, 16:11
Is our universe a brain?, Akira Bergman, 16:05
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:05
Do physicists ignore the changes in gravity WRT the Sun?, Spaceman, 16:03
Re: A sphere of light in GR by KST, Ken S. Tucker, 15:56
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Timo Nieminen, 15:55
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:49
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 15:47
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:44
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 15:32
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:28
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 15:23
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 15:20
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 15:19
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 15:15
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 15:13
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 15:10
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 15:09
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:08
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 15:01
Re: what do you get by mixing all and nothing?, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 14:56
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 14:52
Re: Tank armor Destruction Theory, Douglas Eagleson, 14:46
Re: Tank armor Destruction Theory, Douglas Eagleson, 14:43
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Spaceman, 14:41
Re: The Smart Model again is shown to be more accurate than the QM Orbital Model, S. Enterprize Company, 14:41
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 14:26
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Greg Neill, 14:22
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, cmaj10, 14:18
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 14:17
Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, donstockbauer, 14:16
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Herman Family, 14:15
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 14:14
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 14:10
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., oriel36, 13:56
Re: Videos on Kinematics, umer506, 13:52
Re: Videos on Kinematics, umer506, 13:46
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 13:43
Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 13:42
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 13:40
Re: Videos on Kinematics, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:30
Re: Transformation to a muon?, Spaceman, 13:16
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 13:14
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 13:09
Re: Size as Direction, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 13:03
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 12:58
Re: On excited state of orbital electron, Sergey Karavashkin, 12:56
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:54
Re: Planck length moving at 90 percent of the speed of light, Spaceman, 12:49
Re: Videos on Kinematics, Sam Wormley, 12:43
Re: Planck length moving at 90 percent of the speed of light, Mark Martin, 12:41
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 12:39
Videos on Kinematics, marc b, 12:38
Re: Planck length moving at 90 percent of the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 12:33
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Double-A, 12:32
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 12:27
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:26
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Sam Wormley, 12:24
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:20
Planck length moving at 90 percent of the speed of light, Spaceman, 12:18
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 12:17
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 12:15
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Sam Wormley, 12:09
Re: MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY--IT'S SO OBVIOUS, AND THUS STRING THEORIST'S UTTERLY DETEST IT, Immortalist, 12:05
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:04
Re: time is money, Spaceman, 12:00
Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! David Duchovney of X-Files Fame to Play Brian Greene!!!!, Immortalist, 11:58
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 11:57
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Sam Wormley, 11:57
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 11:54
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 11:48
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 11:47
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 11:40
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 11:35
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Paul Cardinale, 11:35
Re: Physics Nobel Winners CALL EVOLUTION A FARCE -- Or They Should!, Tony, 11:29
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 10:57
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Double-A, 10:54
Re: Physics Nobel Winners CALL EVOLUTION A FARCE -- Or They Should!, Roneal, 10:54
Mother-of-Pearl on Ice: New ceramics might serve in bones and machines, Sam Wormley, 10:47
time is money, dedanoe, 10:45
Re: carbon dioxide ice on the earth?, Sam Wormley, 10:44
Re: Size as Direction, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:42
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 10:35
"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Evird, 10:29
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 10:22
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Jerry, 10:15
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:14
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:13
Re: An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Tom Roberts, 10:05
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 10:02
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:01
Re: Tank armor Destruction Theory, tadchem, 09:30
Re: GOD AT INFINITY, donstockbauer, 09:28
Re: MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY--IT'S SO OBVIOUS, AND THUS STRING THEORIST'S UTTERLY DETEST IT, donstockbauer, 09:23
carbon dioxide ice on the earth?, penseur, 09:16
Re: MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY--IT'S SO OBVIOUS, AND THUS STRING THEORIST'S UTTERLY DETEST IT, Bret Cahill, 09:11
GOD AT INFINITY, Jerry, 09:08
Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! David Duchovney of X-Files Fame to Play Brian Greene!!!!, jollyrogership, 09:06
MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY--IT'S SO OBVIOUS, AND THUS STRING THEORIST'S UTTERLY DETEST IT, jollyrogership, 09:04
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, jmfbahciv, 08:57
An OWLS Reference not mentioned before..., Aetherist, 08:57
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, jmfbahciv, 08:54
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, jmfbahciv, 08:54
Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation,, Rene Tschaggelar, 08:50
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, srp, 08:11
Re: Something I Call An Evolving Spiral - Smart1234, John Bailey, 07:58
Re: What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, Don1, 07:49
Re: What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, Don1, 07:34
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 07:10
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 06:47
Transformation to a muon?, brother Hardy, 06:25
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 06:12
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 04:34
Something I Call An Evolving Spiral - Smart1234, S. Enterprize Company, 04:15
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, June R Harton, 03:58
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, June R Harton, 03:51
Re: Tank armor Destruction Theory, Dave Baker, 03:46
Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:41
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Schoenfeld, 03:38
Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:29
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, FrediFizzx, 03:01
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:50
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:47
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:44
Re: Ceramics come out of the cold, hanson, 02:43
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:37
Re: Guide to trolling - FAO DON1, Traveller, et al, OsherD, 02:33
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, onehappymadman, 02:12
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19: Two Time Directions, OsherD, 02:12
Re: Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Hexenmeister, 02:09
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:09
Re: Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:03
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Eric Gisse, 01:51
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19: Two Time Directions, OsherD, 01:51
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Eric Gisse, 01:48
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Timo Nieminen, 01:42
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Eric Gisse, 01:37
The Smart Model again is shown to be more accurate than the QM Orbital Model, S. Enterprize Company, 01:31
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, Timo Nieminen, 01:26
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19: Two Time Directions, OsherD, 01:15
Re: Size as Direction, platopes, 01:00
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Timo Nieminen, 00:46
Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19: Two Time Directions, OsherD, 00:44
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 00:35
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Timo Nieminen, 00:26
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 00:22
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 00:18
Re: matter may be made transparent, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:13
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 00:13
Re: Tank armor Destruction Theory, Douglas Eagleson, 00:02
Re: Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:01

January 27, 2006

Re: Tank armor Destruction Theory, Douglas Eagleson, 23:58
Tank armor Destruction Theory, Douglas Eagleson, 23:55
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:52
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 23:43
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, RP, 23:42
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 23:40
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 23:22
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 23:18
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 23:12
Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 18: Superconductivity, OsherD, 23:08
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:48
Re: Article: Gravity theory dispenses with dark matter (HTML Post), tadchem, 22:42
Re: Antarctic Lakes, tadchem, 22:31
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 22:23
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 22:16
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 22:10
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 22:08
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 22:02
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 21:56
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 21:54
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 21:51
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Greg Neill, 21:49
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 21:47
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 21:40
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 21:39
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, cyanb, 21:31
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Sam Wormley, 21:28
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Boris Mohar, 21:27
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 21:25
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 21:23
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 21:18
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Sam Wormley, 21:16
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 21:14
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 21:12
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 21:10
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 21:09
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Greg Neill, 21:06
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Eric Gisse, 21:01
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Eric Gisse, 21:00
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 27 January 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 20:32
The Origin of Unit Analysis, Douglas Eagleson, 20:21
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 19:55
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 19:53
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 19:50
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 19:48
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 19:48
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 19:45
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, T Wake, 19:45
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 19:41
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 19:38
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Eric Gisse, 19:35
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Eric Gisse, 19:34
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, OG, 19:32
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 19:30
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Greg Neill, 19:15
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 19:13
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 19:10
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 19:09
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 19:06
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:00
Re: Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Hexenmeister, 18:52
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 18:30
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 18:27
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, T Wake, 18:24
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 18:21
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 18:16
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 18:14
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:11
Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation,, Michael Smith, 18:04
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 17:57
Re: Renormalization revisited, helloworld, 17:55
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 17:54
Re: The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Martin Hogbin, 17:44
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:43
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, donstockbauer, 17:43
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:41
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 17:33
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 17:30
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 17:21
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:20
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 17:18
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 17:18
The third clock aka time dilation debunking 101 continued education, Spaceman, 17:16
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Dirk Van de moortel, 17:10
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:10
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:07
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 17:03
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Dirk Van de moortel, 16:59
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 16:59
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 16:54
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:53
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 16:52
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 16:51
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 16:50
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:50
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:47
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:46
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Dirk Van de moortel, 16:24
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 16:23
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:22
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 16:20
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 16:19
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:18
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 16:16
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:14
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, sal, 16:12
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, onehappymadman, 16:11
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 16:10
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Sam Wormley, 16:09
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Dirk Van de moortel, 16:08
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 16:07
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Sam Wormley, 16:04
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:59
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jan 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 15:56
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Sam Wormley, 15:56
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 15:54
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:52
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 15:50
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 15:49
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Dirk Van de moortel, 15:48
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:45
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:43
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:42
Re: Physics Nobel Winners CALL EVOLUTION A FARCE -- Or They Should!, donstockbauer, 15:40
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:40
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:37
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 15:36
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 15:35
Guide to trolling - FAO DON1, Traveller, et al, T Wake, 15:20
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 15:10
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 15:07
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 14:57
Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, Douglas Eagleson, 14:55
Re: Antarctic Lakes, Ken S. Tucker, 14:50
Re: physical laws and the universe, Traveler, 14:49
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 14:45
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dirk Van de moortel, 14:41
Re: Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Henri Wilson, 14:40
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Henri Wilson, 14:35
Re: Article: Gravity theory dispenses with dark matter (HTML Post), Eric Gisse, 14:31
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Eric Gisse, 14:29
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 14:27
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Eric Gisse, 14:27
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Eric Gisse, 14:23
Re: Article: Gravity theory dispenses with dark matter (HTML Post), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 14:18
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 14:15
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 14:14
Re: Physics Nobel Winners CALL EVOLUTION A FARCE -- Or They Should!, T Wake, 14:12
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, sal, 14:11
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 14:09
Re: Physics Nobel Winners CALL EVOLUTION A FARCE -- Or They Should!, Howard, 14:08
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 14:03
Re: Antarctic Lakes, Mark Martin, 13:55
Re: matter may be made transparent, Sam Wormley, 13:55
Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, T Wake, 13:48
Re: Antarctic Lakes, Randy Poe, 13:47
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 13:45
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Dirk Van de moortel, 13:45
Re: matter may be made transparent, Mark Martin, 13:43
Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, Mark Martin, 13:40
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 13:39
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, freddy osbourne, 13:38
Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation,, Al, 13:37
Re: matter may be made transparent, T Wake, 13:36
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 13:35
Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, T Wake, 13:34
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 13:22
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 13:15
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., PD, 13:15
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 13:13
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 13:08
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 13:06
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., PD, 13:02
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, srp, 13:02
Re: Physics Nobel Winners CALL EVOLUTION A FARCE -- Or They Should!, Mark Martin, 12:58
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Sam Wormley, 12:54
Re: Antarctic Lakes, Ken S. Tucker, 12:53
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 12:52
Re: If so, then proof it!, Sam Wormley, 12:52
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 12:51
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 12:49
Re: physical laws and the universe, photonics, 12:48
Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, srp, 12:45
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 12:44
Re: Physics Nobel Winners CALL EVOLUTION A FARCE -- Or They Should!, Fred Phelps, 12:39
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 12:36
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:36
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 12:34
Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, Aage Andersen, 12:34
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:30
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:30
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:27
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:25
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:24
Physics Nobel Winners CALL EVOLUTION A FARCE -- Or They Should!, edconrad, 12:23
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., PD, 12:23
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:22
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 12:20
Re: physical laws and the universe, Traveler, 12:19
If so, then proof it!, NILS B�RJESSON, 12:17
Re: Antarctic Lakes, thotpoizn, 12:15
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 12:09
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 12:04
Re: Antarctic Lakes, Ken S. Tucker, 12:00
Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, PD, 11:57
Re: God is pure, Richard Herring, 11:52
Re: If so, then proof it!, Sam Wormley, 11:44
Re: physical laws and the universe, Traveler, 11:39
Re: If so, then proof it!, Mark Martin, 11:39
Re: physical laws and the universe, Traveler, 11:34
Re: BÖRJESSONS LOGIC: THE GIST OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY, dej4, 11:32
Re: Antarctic Lakes, thotpoizn, 11:28
If so, then proof it!, NILS B�RJESSON, 11:25
Re: physical laws and the universe, Greg Neill, 11:18
Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, John Christiansen, 11:14
Re: Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Randy Poe, 11:07
Re: matter may be made transparent, Sam Wormley, 11:02
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 11:00
Re: matter may be made transparent, Boris Uon, 10:57
Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, Mark Martin, 10:57
Re: If so, then proof it!, Sam Wormley, 10:55
Re: physical laws and the universe, photonics, 10:47
Re: matter may be made transparent, Mark Martin, 10:34
Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, Aage Andersen, 10:34
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:32
matter may be made transparent, ma1ibu, 10:31
Tusselad is intelligent.. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Hexenmeister, 10:27
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 10:25
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 10:24
Re: Article: Gravity theory dispenses with dark matter (HTML Post), G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:23
Re: Interpretation of the complex wavefunction (Bohr, Einstein or Feynman) ?, PD, 10:17
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 10:14
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dirk Van de moortel, 10:10
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:08
Re: physical laws and the universe, photonics, 10:01
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:59
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:58
Re: Antarctic Lakes, Greg Neill, 09:58
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Paul B. Andersen, 09:58
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:57
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:57
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Evird, 09:55
Re: physical laws and the universe, Greg Neill, 09:52
Re: physical laws and the universe, photonics, 09:48
Antarctic Lakes, thotpoizn, 09:37
If so, then proof it!, NILS B�RJESSON, 09:35
Re: physical laws and the universe, Traveler, 09:32
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 09:26
Re: If so, then proof it!, Boris Uon, 09:20
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 09:17
Re: physical laws and the universe, Traveler, 09:12
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 08:58
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 08:58
Re: what do you get by mixing all and nothing?, Michael Varney, 08:47
Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, Michael Varney, 08:46
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 08:43
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 08:42
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Harry, 08:36
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Michael Varney, 08:35
If so, then proof it!, NILS B�RJESSON, 08:33
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Harry, 08:30
Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation,, Michael Varney, 08:29
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Michael Varney, 08:28
Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, Svante, 08:25
what do you get by mixing all and nothing?, dedanoe, 08:10
Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Hexenmeister, 07:46
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Hexenmeister, 07:17
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 07:08
Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation,, Brian Gaff, 07:06
thermodynamic / entalphy - simple question, Enis, 07:01
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 06:59
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Dirk Van de moortel, 06:34
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Dirk Van de moortel, 06:32
Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Peter Christensen, 06:30
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, jmfbahciv, 06:02
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, tadchem, 05:42
Re: What does it take to be a physicist?, Bob the Builder, 05:00
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Ilja Schmelzer, 04:41
Re: Smart's Semi-Artificial Intelligence, Ian Parker, 04:00
Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, Josef Matz, 03:34
What flavour of aether? Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Hexenmeister, 02:54
Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, Sam Wormley, 02:43
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 02:38
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 02:19
Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 17.2 Theta vs ww*, OsherD, 01:45
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Waldo, 01:13
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 01:00
What does it take to be a physicist?, Siah, 00:45
Re: physical laws and the universe, photonics, 00:36
Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bilge, 00:32
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Greg Neill, 00:32
Re: physical laws and the universe, Greg Neill, 00:29
Re: physical laws and the universe, photonics, 00:25
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., vanep, 00:22

January 26, 2006

Re: Smart's Semi-Artificial Intelligence, S. Enterprize Company, 23:44
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Sam Wormley, 23:40
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 23:36
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 23:32
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 23:29
Ceramics come out of the cold, Sam Wormley, 23:28
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 23:26
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 23:24
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 23:20
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 23:17
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 23:15
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 23:10
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 23:08
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 23:07
Re: What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:06
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 23:05
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:03
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 23:03
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Eric Gisse, 23:02
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Eric Gisse, 23:01
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Mark Martin, 22:47
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 22:43
Re: What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, Mark Martin, 22:42
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Spaceman, 22:41
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 22:39
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 22:38
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Eric Gisse, 22:37
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Spaceman, 22:35
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Ronald Bruck, 22:34
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 22:27
Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, Eric Gisse, 22:25
Re: What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, Eric Gisse, 22:24
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Eric Gisse, 22:23
Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Eric Gisse, 22:20
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 22:16
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Spaceman, 21:59
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Paul Cardinale, 21:57
Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101.., Spaceman, 21:54
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 21:43
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 21:40
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 21:24
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 21:16
Re: What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, Robert J. Kolker, 21:13
Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, Robert J. Kolker, 21:12
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 21:07
Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, donstockbauer, 20:57
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 20:56
Re: What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, donstockbauer, 20:50
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 20:49
What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, Don1, 20:46
What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, Don1, 20:37
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 20:28
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 20:27
SRIM simulation for transmitted ions, wang, 20:20
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:17
Re: in part timelike and in part spacelike, PD, 19:39
Re: Nobel Prize physicist says quantum computers will never work reliably, Andy Spragg, 19:28
Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:23
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 19:17
Re: Size as Direction, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:16
in part timelike and in part spacelike, NILS B�RJESSON, 19:16
Re: Size as Direction, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:16
Re: physical laws and the universe, Hexenmeister, 19:15
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, PD, 19:14
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, jgreimer, 19:09
Re: Is the theory about matter evaporating in black holes an exception to the First Law of Thermodynamics?, Michael Varney, 19:03
Re: Is time dilation real?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:00
Re: Article: Gravity theory dispenses with dark matter (HTML Post), Eric Gisse, 18:55
Re: in part timelike and in part spacelike, PD, 18:54
Re: physical laws and the universe, Traveler, 18:50
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 18:47
Re: Is the theory about matter evaporating in black holes an exception to the First Law of Thermodynamics?, Spaceman, 18:45
Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:43
Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:42
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 18:36
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 18:30
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 18:24
Re: physical laws and the universe, Ken S. Tucker, 18:20
Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:04
Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:02
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 17:55
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 17:49
Re: A sphere of light in GR by KST, Ken S. Tucker, 17:35
Article: Gravity theory dispenses with dark matter (HTML Post), Robert Karl Stonjek, 17:17
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Don1, 16:29
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 16:28
in part timelike and in part spacelike, NILS B�RJESSON, 16:24
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 16:17
Re: physical laws and the universe, Traveler, 16:17
Re: physical laws and the universe, Ken S. Tucker, 16:12
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 15:56
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 15:54
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 15:47
Re: in part timelike and in part spacelike, PD, 15:41
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 15:37
in part timelike and in part spacelike, NILS B�RJESSON, 15:34
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Martin Kowatsch, 15:33
Re: Is the theory about matter evaporating in black holes an exception to the First Law of Thermodynamics?, Michael Varney, 15:28
Re: Is the theory about matter evaporating in black holes an exception to the First Law of Thermodynamics?, Michael Varney, 15:27
Re: physical laws and the universe, photonics, 14:59
Re: physical laws and the universe, photonics, 14:47
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 14:34
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, FrediFizzx, 14:33
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 14:31
Re: Is the theory about matter evaporating in black holes an exception to the First Law of Thermodynamics?, Mark Martin, 14:25
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, T Wake, 14:19
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 14:17
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 14:17
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Eric Gisse, 14:16
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 14:09
Re: Is the theory about matter evaporating in black holes an exception to the First Law of Thermodynamics?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:08
Re: On excited state of orbital electron, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:08
Re: Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, Hexenmeister, 14:05
On excited state of orbital electron, Sergey Karavashkin, 14:05
Re: What creates the Charge?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:03
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, mmeron, 13:58
Re: What creates the Charge?, Spaceman, 13:54
Re: Is the theory about matter evaporating in black holes an exception to the First Law of Thermodynamics?, Androcles, 13:53
Re: What creates the Charge?, PD, 13:53
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 13:51
Novel research in Artificial Intelligence?, Svante, 13:50
Re: Is the theory about matter evaporating in black holes an exception to the First Law of Thermodynamics?, Sam Wormley, 13:49
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 13:45
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 13:44
Re: What creates the Charge?, Aetherist, 13:41
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 13:41
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 13:38
Re: What creates the Charge?, PD, 13:37
Re: Maxwell and Heaviside, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:35
Re: What creates the Charge?, Spaceman, 13:34
Re: Is the theory about matter evaporating in black holes an exception to the First Law of Thermodynamics?, Spaceman, 13:32
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 13:30
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 13:30
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, mmeron, 13:27
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 13:19
Re: What creates the Charge?, PD, 13:19
Is the theory about matter evaporating in black holes an exception to the First Law of Thermodynamics?, rev.goetz, 13:10
Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:07
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 13:00
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Peter, 12:59
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 12:58
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 12:55
Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Androcles, 12:51
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 12:45
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 12:39
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 12:37
Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Steve O, 12:37
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, mmeron, 12:35
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 12:35
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, hanson, 12:19
Re: the probe to Pluto, Michael Varney, 12:18
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 12:17
Re: What creates the Charge?, Aetherist, 12:16
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 12:16
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 12:13
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, T Wake, 12:12
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, T Wake, 12:10
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 12:06
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 12:04
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 12:03
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 12:02
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 12:00
Re: the probe to Pluto, Spaceman, 11:49
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 11:47
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 11:45
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, PD, 11:40
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, PD, 11:34
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 11:34
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 11:32
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 11:28
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 11:28
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 11:24
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 11:21
Re: Interpretation of the complex wavefunction (Bohr, Einstein or Feynman) ?, Peter, 11:18
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Harry, 11:05
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 10:59
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:55
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 10:55
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 10:53
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 10:52
Re: Smart's Semi-Artificial Intelligence, Ian Parker, 10:45
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 10:41
Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 10:39
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 10:38
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:36
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:35
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 10:33
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 10:27
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:26
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:25
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 10:18
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 10:14
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Evird, 10:10
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, clujdej, 09:58
Re: What creates the Charge?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:58
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, clujdej, 09:55
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, PD, 09:53
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, clujdej, 09:52
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, PD, 09:48
Re: Is time dilation real?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:46
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 09:45
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 09:40
Re: Smart's Semi-Artificial Intelligence, S. Enterprize Company, 08:56
Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, donstockbauer, 08:51
Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 08:42
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 08:13
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 08:06
Re: Is time dilation real?, The Ghost In The Machine, 07:00
Re: Volcanoes reveal a new side, mmeron, 05:48
Re: Volcanoes reveal a new side, tadchem, 05:43
Re: Smart's Semi-Artificial Intelligence, Ian Parker, 05:39
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Harry, 05:25
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Harry, 05:23
Re: Cosmic proton ray 10^14 eV and Cosmic gamma ray 10^14 MeV; 1997, named GRB 971214, Autymn D. C., 04:51
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Harry, 04:14
Re: Is time dilation real?, Androcles, 04:08
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Y.Porat, 04:01
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Harry, 03:58
Re: BÖRJESSONS LOGIC: LOGIC IS GEOMETRY, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 03:49
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, June R Harton, 03:49
Re: What creates the Charge?, Y.Porat, 03:48
Re: the probe to Pluto, Androcles, 03:45
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 17.1: Theta Properties Continued, OsherD, 03:40
Re: the probe to Pluto, John Popelish, 03:38
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:31
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:22
Smart's Semi-Artificial Intelligence, S. Enterprize Company, 03:13
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:12
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 17.1: Theta Properties Continued, OsherD, 03:02
Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation,, InEurope, 03:02
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, mmeron, 02:55
Re: Further forms of function (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 18: Security Nahtloser, OsherD, 02:51
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:46
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Y.Porat, 02:42
Re: Size as Direction, platopes, 02:41
Re: Further forms of function (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 18: Security Nahtloser, OsherD, 02:40
Re: Is time dilation real?, Androcles, 02:30
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Ilja Schmelzer, 02:24
Re: Further forms of function (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 18: Security Nahtloser, OsherD, 02:24
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:19
Re: HIV/AIDS As Fear-Anger Phases vs Acceleration-Deceleration Phases, Bob Cain, 02:00
Re: the probe to Pluto, Eric Gisse, 01:55
Maxwell and Heaviside, Bob the Builder, 01:46
Re: Is time dilation real?, Bob Cain, 01:45
Re: the probe to Pluto, Androcles, 01:39
Re: Is time dilation real?, Androcles, 01:30
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 01:27
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 01:13
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 01:11
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Androcles, 01:05
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Don Kelly, 01:00
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, mmeron, 00:53
Re: physical laws and the universe, photonics, 00:35
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 00:31
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 17: Theta Properties, Ben Luden, 00:29
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 17: Theta Properties, Ben Luden, 00:28
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 00:24
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 00:20
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 00:19
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Waldo, 00:04

January 25, 2006

Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, fishfry, 23:49
Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation,, Scott Miller, 23:36
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Androcles, 23:25
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 23:22
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 23:15
Re: curses, James "Kibo" Parry, 23:10
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 23:08
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, chan, 22:58
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 22:36
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 22:28
Volcanoes reveal a new side, Sam Wormley, 22:21
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 22:16
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 22:13
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 22:13
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 22:10
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 22:09
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 22:07
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Eric Gisse, 22:01
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 22:00
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 21:50
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 21:48
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 21:42
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 21:40
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 21:39
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 21:32
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 21:30
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 21:24
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, odin, 21:23
Re: What creates the Charge?, Paul Cardinale, 21:20
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Waldo, 21:16
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, odin, 21:16
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 21:15
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 21:07
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, xxein, 21:01
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 20:59
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 20:56
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 20:54
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 20:51
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 20:42
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 20:31
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 20:26
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 20:24
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 20:17
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 20:16
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 20:09
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 20:07
Re: Interpretation of the complex wavefunction (Bohr, Einstein or Feynman) ?, Mike Jr., 20:06
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 20:03
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 20:00
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 19:47
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 19:42
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Joe Fischer, 19:39
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 19:37
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 19:35
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 19:29
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 19:29
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 19:26
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 19:23
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 19:21
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 19:19
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 19:18
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 19:16
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Russell, 19:08
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 17: Theta Properties, OsherD, 19:07
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Eric Gisse, 19:06
Re: Third Order Symbol Resolution, Douglas Eagleson, 19:03
Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 17: Theta Properties, OsherD, 18:59
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 18:57
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 18:56
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Robert J. Kolker, 18:54
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 18:54
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Robert J. Kolker, 18:53
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 18:51
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 18:49
Re: the probe to Pluto, John Popelish, 18:44
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 18:43
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 18:42
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 18:42
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 18:35
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 18:35
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 18:34
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 18:34
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 18:29
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 18:25
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 18:22
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 18:21
Re: the probe to Pluto, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:19
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 18:19
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 18:19
Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?, Eric Gisse, 18:18
Re: God is pure, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:15
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 18:15
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 18:14
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Spaceman, 18:14
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 18:13
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Sam Wormley, 18:09
Re: What creates the Charge?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:06
Re: Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is..., mmeron, 18:04
Re: ASIMOV in fuzzy logic, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:02
Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?, Michael Varney, 18:01
Re: Size as Direction, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:57
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 17:57
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 17:56
Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?, Michael Varney, 17:55
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 17:55
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Spaceman, 17:53
Re: Is time dilation real?, Gary Matthews, 17:51
Re: Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is..., Michael Varney, 17:51
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, tadchem, 17:50
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Sam Wormley, 17:49
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 17:47
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, odin, 17:46
Re: Literacy, aesthete8, 17:45
Re: Blackholes revealed, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:44
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, rev.goetz, 17:43
Re: Is time dilation real?, Gary Matthews, 17:43
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 17:39
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 17:38
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, donstockbauer, 17:33
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 17:28
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Traveler, 17:21
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:18
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 17:14
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 17:09
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:52
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 16:48
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, The Rocket Scientist, 16:48
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 16:46
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 16:43
Re: More or Less Than the Sum of Its Parts, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:42
Re: What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Richard Henry, 16:37
Re: Is time dilation real?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:35
Re: Literacy, aesthete8, 16:29
Re: Is time dilation real?, Androcles, 16:27
Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Androcles, 16:23
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 16:14
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 16:11
Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, sal, 15:58
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 15:57
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 15:54
What is your opinion of Newton's First Law?, Don1, 15:49
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Joe Fischer, 15:45
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 15:44
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 15:40
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 15:39
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 15:38
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 15:37
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 15:37
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 15:34
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Spaceman, 15:33
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, chan, 15:27
Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?, helloworld, 15:19
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, JanPB, 15:16
Re: World Peace, markwh04, 15:16
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 15:13
Re: Third Order Symbol Resolution, Puppet_Sock, 14:58
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 14:35
Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?, onehappymadman, 14:31
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 14:31
Re: Is time dilation real?, Gary Matthews, 14:28
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 14:23
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Martin Hogbin, 14:21
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 14:20
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 14:17
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 14:15
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 14:15
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 14:13
Re: physical laws and the universe, Ken S. Tucker, 14:09
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 14:01
Re: Blackholes revealed, PD, 14:01
Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, rev.goetz, 13:56
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:49
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 13:47
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 13:47
Re: physical laws and the universe, Traveler, 13:46
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, PD, 13:45
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:44
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, kk, 13:43
Re: physical laws and the universe, Spaceman, 13:42
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 13:40
Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 13:38
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 13:38
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 13:37
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, kk, 13:36
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 13:34
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 13:28
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 13:27
Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?, Michael Varney, 13:25
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 13:22
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 13:18
Re: physical laws and the universe, Androcles, 13:10
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 13:10
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:08
Re: Literacy, Pepe le Pew, 13:08
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 13:07
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 13:02
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 13:00
Re: automated physical dimensions and units in scientific programs, Androcles, 12:52
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, PD, 12:49
Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Androcles, 12:44
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 12:38
Cosmic proton ray 10^14 eV and Cosmic gamma ray 10^14 MeV; 1997, named GRB 971214, a_plutonium, 12:35
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Spaceman, 12:30
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Bilge, 12:26
Re: physical laws and the universe, Spaceman, 12:21
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Androcles, 12:20
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 12:19
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 12:15
Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Dirk Van de moortel, 12:11
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 12:08
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Randy Poe, 12:06
Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Peter Christensen, 12:02
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 11:58
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:58
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 11:55
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 11:52
Re: physical laws and the universe, Traveler, 11:49
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 11:45
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:36
Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?, onehappymadman, 11:34
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Harry, 11:34
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, kk, 11:22
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 11:19
Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?, Michael Varney, 11:11
Third Order Symbol Resolution, Douglas Eagleson, 11:05
Re: Thermal expansion question, Greg Neill, 11:04
Re: God is pure, Richard Herring, 11:01
Re: Thermal expansion question, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:59
Re: Thermal expansion question, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:55
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Harry, 10:53
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:50
"The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Evird, 10:47
Re: physical laws and the universe, photonics, 10:32
Interpretation of the complex wavefunction (Bohr, Einstein or Feynman) ?, Peter Christensen, 10:27
Re: Blackholes revealed, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:23
Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?, John C . Polasek, 10:21
Re: Is time dilation real?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:20
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, donstockbauer, 10:12
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, rotchm@xxxxxxxxx, 10:11
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:09
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:08
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:08
Re: Is time dilation real?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:02
Re: Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is..., PD, 10:02
Re: God is pure, donstockbauer, 09:58
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:50
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:50
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:49
Re: Multiples of the resonant frequency of a solenoid plunger connected to a spring ???, Greg Neill, 09:48
Re: OBSCENE PHOTO REMOVED FROM INTERNET, Mark Martin, 09:45
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 09:44
Blog about Clifford Even Algebra and Physics., R.Aparicio, 09:39
Re: physical laws and the universe, Mike, 09:36
Re: physical laws and the universe, Mike, 09:29
Re: Multiples of the resonant frequency of a solenoid plunger connected to a spring ???, jalbers, 09:28
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 09:24
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 09:12
OBSCENE PHOTO REMOVED FROM INTERNET, Ed Conrad, 08:41
Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?, briggs, 08:27
Re: automated physical dimensions and units in scientific programs, Jan Panteltje, 08:05
Re: Multiples of the resonant frequency of a solenoid plunger connected to a spring ???, Jan Panteltje, 08:05
Re: All's right with the world, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:51
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:35
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, donstockbauer, 07:24
Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?, Jakob Rohrhirsch, 07:04
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Hero . van . Jindelt, 07:00
dedanoe's universe, dedanoe, 06:59
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:54
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:46
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Androcles, 06:43
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 06:34
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:32
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, PD, 06:24
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 06:11
Re: Size as Direction, platopes, 05:02
Re: Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is..., mmeron, 04:41
Re: Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is..., platopes, 04:22
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 16: p-Laplacians, 1-Laplacians, OsherD, 04:13
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 16: p-Laplacians, 1-Laplacians, OsherD, 04:00
Re: Size as Direction, platopes, 03:32
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Jerry, 03:25
Re: Is time dilation real?, Gary Matthews, 03:21
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Y.Porat, 03:04
Re: HIV/AIDS As Fear-Anger Phases vs Acceleration-Deceleration Phases, OsherD, 03:04
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Y.Porat, 03:02
Re: What Are the Thread-Interrupting Trolls After?, Bob Cain, 03:02
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 16: p-Laplacians, 1-Laplacians, OsherD, 02:42
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Cliff Wilusk, 02:35
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 16: p-Laplacians, 1-Laplacians, OsherD, 02:30
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Cliff Wilusk, 02:25
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 02:20
Re: A sphere of light in GR by KST, Ken S. Tucker, 02:05
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Androcles, 01:56
Re: physical laws and the universe, Androcles, 01:49
Re: What Are the Thread-Interrupting Trolls After?, OsherD, 01:48
Re: Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, dej4, 01:27
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Henri Wilson, 01:13
Re: automated physical dimensions and units in scientific programs, Androcles, 00:42
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:24
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:14
Re: Return of the Puppet Masters: Ponerological Implications of Toxoplasmosis, donstockbauer, 00:04

January 24, 2006

Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Bob Cain, 23:55
Re: Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is..., Michael Varney, 23:32
Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is..., Marco Dorantes, 23:22
Re: Is time dilation real?, Gary Matthews, 23:13
Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 22:36
Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 22:33
best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?, Sam Wormley, 22:22
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, Autymn D. C., 21:41
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Androcles, 21:17
Return of the Puppet Masters: Ponerological Implications of Toxoplasmosis, Dove, 20:54
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, chan, 20:17
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Spaceman, 20:16
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Sam Wormley, 19:52
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Spaceman, 19:22
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 19:15
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 19:12
Re: What creates the Charge?, ma1ibu, 19:10
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 19:06
Re: automated physical dimensions and units in scientific programs, Grant W. Petty, 19:03
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 19:01
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 18:42
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, chan, 17:54
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 17:37
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Don Kelly, 17:31
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Henri Wilson, 17:28
Re: Size as Direction, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:03
Re: physical laws and the universe, Ken S. Tucker, 16:50
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, tadchem, 16:48
Re: physical laws and the universe, Androcles, 16:40
Re: physical laws and the universe, Androcles, 16:38
Re: Multiples of the resonant frequency of a solenoid plunger connected to a spring ???, Greg Neill, 16:20
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 16:18
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Eric Gisse, 16:12
Re: Multiples of the resonant frequency of a solenoid plunger connected to a spring ???, jalbers, 15:29
Re: physical laws and the universe, Ken S. Tucker, 15:12
Re: All's right with the world, richard miller, 15:02
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Androcles, 14:55
Re: Multiples of the resonant frequency of a solenoid plunger connected to a spring ???, Jan Panteltje, 14:51
Re: simultaneous wave/particle detection article, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 14:49
All's right with the world, Richard Henry, 14:46
Re: Multiples of the resonant frequency of a solenoid plunger connected to a spring ???, Ben Luden, 14:43
Re: Multiples of the resonant frequency of a solenoid plunger connected to a spring ???, Helmut Wabnig, 14:38
Re: Multiples of the resonant frequency of a solenoid plunger connected to a spring ???, Greg Neill, 14:30
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, mmeron, 14:30
Re: physical laws and the universe, Mike, 14:21
Multiples of the resonant frequency of a solenoid plunger connected to a spring ???, jalbers, 14:15
Re: physical laws and the universe, Ken S. Tucker, 14:13
Test of Special Relativity by Use of an Optical First Order Experiment, Martin Kowatsch, 14:04
Re: physical laws and the universe, Spaceman, 13:59
Re: physical laws and the universe, Mike, 13:50
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 13:47
Re: physical laws and the universe, Martin Hogbin, 13:41
Re: Literacy, Michael Varney, 13:40
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 13:39
Re: physical laws and the universe, PD, 13:22
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, brad, 13:22
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 13:16
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 13:06
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 13:01
Re: Literacy, Pepe le Pew, 12:47
Re: question, srp, 12:40
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 12:31
Re: physical laws and the universe, mmeron, 12:29
Re: Blackholes revealed, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 12:27
Re: Literacy, zookumar yelubandi, 12:23
Re: What creates the Charge?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 12:20
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 12:20
Re: test, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:15
Re: Is time dilation real?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 12:14
Re: question, asdf, 12:10
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 12:07
Re: physical laws and the universe, Ken S. Tucker, 12:00
Re: electron structure, Spaceman, 11:56
Re: Literacy, zookumar yelubandi, 11:53
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 11:41
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, CrankHater, 11:12
Re: physical laws and the universe, photonics, 11:00
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, CrankHater, 10:58
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 10:54
Re: Ed Conrad in Deep, Deep Sh-t -- RETRACTS ATTACKS..., CrankHater, 10:52
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, CrankHater, 10:17
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:10
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:09
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:09
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:07
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:06
Re: Is time dilation real?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:48
"The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Evird, 09:40
Re: question, Schoenfeld, 09:37
Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, donstockbauer, 09:32
Re: physical laws and the universe, Michael Varney, 09:30
Ed Conrad in Deep, Deep Sh-t -- RETRACTS ATTACKS..., Ed Conrad, 09:28
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, donstockbauer, 09:26
Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, PD, 09:22
Re: question, Schoenfeld, 09:17
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 09:08
Re: question, Sam Wormley, 09:04
Fungi growth cause brain infections in Marijuana smokers, Vin Mariani, 09:02
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, PD, 08:57
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, PD, 08:55
Re: physical laws and the universe, Vin Mariani, 08:50
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Herman Trivilino, 08:02
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Herman Trivilino, 07:58
Re: physical laws and the universe, Jan Panteltje, 07:51
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 07:37
Re: physical laws and the universe, Mike, 07:21
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 07:03
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Richard Herring, 06:59
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 06:56
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, jmfbahciv, 06:45
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Y.Porat, 06:37
Re: question, asdf, 06:32
Re: Size as Direction, photonics, 06:29
physical laws and the universe, photonics, 05:58
Re: NO FUTURE FOR AUSTRALIA, CrankHater, 05:47
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Mike, 05:35
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, RP, 05:13
Re: Interesting Past Discussions in another Forum about The Smart Model..., S. Enterprize Company, 05:01
Re: electron structure, Michael Varney, 04:46
Re: Interesting Past Discussions in another Forum about The Smart Model..., S. Enterprize Company, 04:44
Re: Interesting Past Discussions in another Forum about The Smart Model..., S. Enterprize Company, 04:42
Re: Literacy, Michael Varney, 04:40
Interesting Past Discussions in another Forum about The Smart Model..., S. Enterprize Company, 04:38
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Paul B. Andersen, 04:37
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Ilja Schmelzer, 04:30
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Ilja Schmelzer, 04:25
Size as Direction, platopes, 03:43
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, Bob Cain, 03:20
Re: Literacy, zookumar yelubandi, 03:13
Re: Literacy, zookumar yelubandi, 03:05
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Eric Gisse, 02:10
Re: What creates the Charge?, Y.Porat, 02:01
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Y.Porat, 01:50
Re: What creates the Charge?, Y.Porat, 01:27
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Androcles, 01:20
Re: the probe to Pluto, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 00:42
Re: What creates the Charge?, franklinhu, 00:32
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Sam Wormley, 00:11
Re: question, donstockbauer, 00:09

January 23, 2006

Re: question, Sam Wormley, 23:58
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:50
Re: Blackholes revealed, Sam Wormley, 23:49
Re: Can someone explain this Heisenburg quote on Schrodingers equation, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 23:10
Viruses and protozoans, Microflora of marijuana, Jn, 23:07
Re: the probe to Pluto, Eric Gisse, 23:05
Re: the probe to Pluto, Spaceman, 22:49
Re: SUBJECT: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE, Jn, 22:43
Re: What creates the Charge?, Aetherist, 22:27
Re: What creates the Charge?, Aetherist, 22:23
Re: question, Eric Gisse, 22:14
Re: question, asdf, 22:03
Re: What creates the Charge?, Paul Cardinale, 22:00
Re: the probe to Pluto, Eric Gisse, 21:45
Re: Blackholes revealed, Paul Cardinale, 21:44
Re: Blackholes revealed, Spaceman, 21:28
Re: the probe to Pluto, Spaceman, 21:25
Re: the probe to Pluto, Spaceman, 21:23
Re: Zero Point Energy & Gravity Debate 2, Jn, 21:18
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Eric Gisse, 21:11
Re: Literacy, Eric Gisse, 21:10
Re: the probe to Pluto, Eric Gisse, 21:07
Re: Literacy, Michael Varney, 21:06
Re: test, donstockbauer, 20:51
Re: test, Hexenmeister, 20:42
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 20:07
Re: Literacy, Boris Mohar, 20:04
Re: dedanoe's becoming a paradox expert, dedanoe, 19:56
Re: Synchronization Between Pendulums, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:56
Re: dedanoe's becoming a paradox expert, dedanoe, 19:55
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:35
Re: Literacy, Michael Varney, 19:31
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:09
Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, buyanovsky, 19:09
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Bilge, 18:56
Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:55
Re: A Real Fusion Plant Design, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:39
Re: Literacy, zookumar yelubandi, 18:30
Re: To late to save civilisation, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:21
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Hero . van . Jindelt, 18:21
Re: the probe to Pluto, Spaceman, 18:17
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 18:17
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 18:08
Re: the probe to Pluto, Eric Gisse, 18:07
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 18:01
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:51
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 17:46
Re: Zero Point Energy & Gravity Debate 2, Spaceman, 17:43
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 17:39
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:34
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 17:33
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 17:30
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 17:26
Re: Zero Point Energy & Gravity Debate 2, Tater Schuld, 17:25
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 17:17
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:00
s.p.relativity for the relativity winges, Puppet_Sock, 17:00
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 16:55
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 16:45
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 16:44
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:39
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:38
SUBJECT: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE, ACE, 16:38
Re: the probe to Pluto, Spaceman, 16:36
Re: the probe to Pluto, Eric Gisse, 16:30
Re: What creates the Charge?, Orion, 16:24
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 16:08
Re: BÖRJESSONS LOGIC: LOGIC IS GEOMETRY, Michael Varney, 15:59
A sphere of light in GR by KST, Ken S. Tucker, 15:58
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 15:58
Re: Is time dilation real?, Wugi, 15:57
Re: B�RJESSONS LOGIC: THE GIST OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY, John Christiansen, 15:51
Zero Point Energy & Gravity Debate 2, Jack Sarfatti, 15:50
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 15:31
Re: electron structure =Photons, Paul Cardinale, 15:15
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 15:12
Re: Thermal expansion question, Spaceman, 15:11
Re: the probe to Pluto, Spaceman, 15:09
Re: Is this theory right?, Paul Cardinale, 15:09
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, T Wake, 15:08
Re: the probe to Pluto, Eric Gisse, 15:01
Re: BÖRJESSONS LOGIC: LOGIC IS GEOMETRY, Mike, 14:52
Re: Thermal expansion question, Greg Neill, 14:52
Re: What creates the Charge?, Paul Cardinale, 14:49
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Eric Gisse, 14:49
Re: the probe to Pluto, Spaceman, 14:39
Re: the probe to Pluto, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:34
Re: the probe to Pluto, Michael Varney, 14:33
A Trick System, Douglas Eagleson, 14:27
Re: B�RJESSONS LOGIC: LOGIC IS GEOMETRY, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:25
Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Dirk Van de moortel, 14:24
Re: Thermal expansion question, Spaceman, 14:24
B�RJESSONS LOGIC: THE GIST OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY, NILS B�RJESSON, 14:17
B�RJESSONS LOGIC: TIME IS ALGEBRA!, NILS B�RJESSON, 14:13
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 14:13
Re: the probe to Pluto, Spaceman, 14:12
B�RJESSONS LOGIC: LOGIC IS GEOMETRY, NILS B�RJESSON, 14:08
Re: test, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:06
test, NILS B�RJESSON, 14:06
Re: the probe to Pluto, Spaceman, 14:05
Re: Thermal expansion question, Greg Neill, 14:05
Re: the probe to Pluto, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:05
Re: the probe to Pluto, Spaceman, 14:03
Re: Literacy, Pepe le Pew, 13:58
Re: the probe to Pluto, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:58
Re: the probe to Pluto, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:56
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 13:46
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:38
Re: A Real Fusion Plant Design, Douglas Eagleson, 13:24
Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, rev.goetz, 13:19
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:17
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Y.Porat, 13:01
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 12:53
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 12:53
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 12:52
Re: Literacy, Michael Varney, 12:42
Re: the probe to Pluto, Bruce Scott TOK, 12:39
Re: Thermal expansion question, Spaceman, 12:29
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, briggs, 12:28
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 12:14
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 12:14
curses, kstocklmeir, 12:13
curses, kstocklmeir, 12:12
curses, kstocklmeir, 12:11
curses, kstocklmeir, 12:10
Re: Thermal expansion question, Greg Neill, 12:07
Re: Literacy, John Tibbs, 12:00
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 11:56
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 11:53
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Spaceman, 11:53
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, mmeron, 11:50
Re: the probe to Pluto, Spaceman, 11:45
Re: How to calculate Mass, Greg Neill, 11:39
Re: electron structure, Spaceman, 11:38
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 11:35
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 11:32
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, Greg Neill, 11:24
Re: Thermal expansion question, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:20
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Hexenmeister, 11:12
Re: Literacy, zookumar yelubandi, 11:00
Re: the probe to Pluto, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, John C . Polasek, 10:57
"Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Evird, 10:52
Re: Curved Space Geometry, Sam Wormley, 10:50
Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 10:47
Re: Literacy, Michael Varney, 10:34
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 10:32
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 10:30
Re: Literacy, John Tibbs, 10:23
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 10:22
Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, kenseto, 10:17
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 10:16
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, David Thomson, 10:09
Re: simultaneous wave/particle detection article, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 10:09
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 10:09
Re: simultaneous wave/particle detection article, Mike, 10:09
Re: simultaneous wave/particle detection article, Mike, 10:07
Re: Curved Space Geometry, Michael Varney, 10:03
Re: simultaneous wave/particle detection article, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 10:02
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Michael Varney, 10:01
Curved Space Geometry, dmtbgv, 09:55
Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 09:55
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 09:48
What creates the Charge?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:44
Re: Question about liquid-gas critcal temperature, Andy Resnick, 09:42
Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 09:38
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 09:30
Re: electron structure =Photons, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:30
Re: simultaneous wave/particle detection article, Schoenfeld, 09:30
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, Autymn D. C., 09:28
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 09:28
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 09:26
Re: simultaneous wave/particle detection article, Autymn D. C., 09:22
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 09:21
Re: lead x-ray fluorescence, Andreas Goedicke, 09:19
Re: curses, Richard Herring, 09:17
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 09:14
Re: electron structure, Traveler, 08:48
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 08:38
Re: Measuring infinity, Michael Varney, 08:16
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, jmfbahciv, 08:13
Re: electron structure, Michael Varney, 08:11
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, briggs, 08:11
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, jmfbahciv, 08:09
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, jmfbahciv, 08:06
Re: the probe to Pluto, Michael Varney, 08:06
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Michael Varney, 08:02
Re: the probe to Pluto, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:36
Blackholes revealed, Paul Burn, 07:32
Re: dedanoe's becoming a paradox expert, donstockbauer, 07:31
Re: the probe to Pluto, Dirk Van de moortel, 07:26
Re: A Real Fusion Plant Design, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:25
Re: the probe to Pluto, The Ghost In The Machine, 07:00
dedanoe's becoming a paradox expert, dedanoe, 06:42
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, donstockbauer, 06:27
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, Autymn D. C., 06:22
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, The Ghost In The Machine, 06:00
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, The Ghost In The Machine, 06:00
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, The Ghost In The Machine, 06:00
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 23, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:42
Re: Literacy, Michael Varney, 05:29
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 05:16
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Richard Herring, 05:15
How to calculate Mass, InEurope, 05:10
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Autymn D. C., 05:02
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, tadchem, 04:50
Re: HIV/AIDS As Fear-Anger Phases vs Acceleration-Deceleration Phases, Bob Cain, 03:58
Re: Literacy, zookumar yelubandi, 03:50
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Hero . van . Jindelt, 03:40
Re: automated physical dimensions and units in scientific programs, Hexenmeister, 03:40
Re: the probe to Pluto, Hexenmeister, 03:39
Re: the probe to Pluto, Eric Gisse, 03:17
Re: HIV/AIDS As Fear-Anger Phases vs Acceleration-Deceleration Phases, OsherD, 02:37
the probe to Pluto, onehappymadman, 02:37
Re: HIV/AIDS As Fear-Anger Phases vs Acceleration-Deceleration Phases, Jn, 02:23
Re: HIV/AIDS As Fear-Anger Phases vs Acceleration-Deceleration Phases, OsherD, 02:23
Re: automated physical dimensions and units in scientific programs, Bob the Builder, 02:19
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, franklinhu, 02:17
Re: HIV/AIDS As Fear-Anger Phases vs Acceleration-Deceleration Phases, OsherD, 02:10
HIV/AIDS As Fear-Anger Phases vs Acceleration-Deceleration Phases, OsherD, 02:04
Re: Literacy, mmeron, 01:56
Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, Jn, 01:44
Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 01:30
Re: The proof of mass vector., Hexenmeister, 01:22
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:19
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Michael Varney, 01:18
Re: Koran and relativity <grin>, Michael Varney, 01:16
Many Worlds Probability Problem, rev.goetz, 01:12
Re: Literacy, Eric Gisse, 01:02
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 01:01
Literacy, Michael Varney, 00:41
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Bob Cain, 00:29

January 22, 2006

Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 23:44
Re: Altered method extends bubble-fusion claim, Sam Wormley, 23:08
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 23:03
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Jn, 22:57
Re: How big is the Universe?, LEFTY, 22:52
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 22:42
Re: Gravity, Sam Wormley, 22:32
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 22:19
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Herman Trivilino, 22:13
Re: If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Mark Martin, 21:55
Re: sci.crank, LEFTY, 21:43
Re: curses, LEFTY, 21:37
If it has no volume, and doesn't exert force, Don1, 21:36
Re: How big is the Universe?, donstockbauer, 21:34
Re: How big is the Universe?, i_cu_l8tr, 21:22
Re: automated physical dimensions and units in scientific programs, Hexenmeister, 21:20
Re: A Real Fusion Plant Design, donstockbauer, 21:16
A Real Fusion Plant Design, Douglas Eagleson, 21:12
Re: AN APOLOGY TO LISTENERS OF TALK RADIO, cbrown, 21:12
Re: How big is the Universe?, Hexenmeister, 21:11
Re: How big is the Universe?, Hexenmeister, 21:08
Re: Gravity, i_cu_l8tr, 20:58
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, hanson, 20:57
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 20:50
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, G. L. Bradford, 20:24
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 19:57
Re: How big is the Universe?, Branimir Maksimovic, 19:51
Re: question, Mike, 19:23
Re: What Are the Thread-Interrupting Trolls After?, Hero . van . Jindelt, 19:22
Re: How big is the Universe?, Branimir Maksimovic, 19:14
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Tom Roberts, 19:08
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
J.P. Vigier's "tight atomic states" & spatially extended electron, Jack Sarfatti, 18:56
Re: automated physical dimensions and units in scientific programs, Bob the Builder, 18:34
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Eric Gisse, 18:17
Re: Light behaving as Particle & Wave at SAME time?, Mike Mainville, 17:58
Re: Koran and relativity <grin>, michalchik, 17:45
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Hexenmeister, 17:35
Re: Edward Witten, John Nash ("A Beautiful Mind"), And (df/dx)(dg/dx) 2: Witten Laplacian, Jn, 17:26
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, chan, 17:18
Re: Thermal expansion question, Hexenmeister, 17:18
Re: question, Hexenmeister, 17:16
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 17:15
Re: lead x-ray fluorescence, Andreas Goedicke, 17:14
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 17:14
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 17:10
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 17:03
Edward Witten, John Nash ("A Beautiful Mind"), And (df/dx)(dg/dx) 2: Witten Laplacian, OsherD, 16:58
Re: Gravity, Hexenmeister, 16:57
Re: Electrical "Shorted-Turn" Phenomena ?, Hexenmeister, 16:55
Is this theory right?, Phorthythia of illiteracy, 16:55
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, OsherD, 16:36
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 16:31
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, OsherD, 16:22
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, FrediFizzx, 16:19
Re: AN APOLOGY TO LISTENERS OF TALK RADIO, Mark lman, 16:03
Re: question, mmeron, 16:01
Re: question, srp, 15:42
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Randy Poe, 15:34
Re: Altered method extends bubble-fusion claim, mmeron, 15:24
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Aetherist, 15:14
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:09
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: Gravity, Michael Varney, 14:56
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:51
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 14:45
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 14:45
Re: HaHaHanson Knows: Laughter Proves Good Medicine for Heart, hanson, 14:45
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, hanson, 14:45
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, hanson, 14:44
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, hanson, 14:44
Re: question, Mark Martin, 14:35
Re: FAQ, FrediFizzx, 14:28
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, mmeron, 14:16
Re: Thermal expansion question, mmeron, 14:13
Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity", The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
Re: question, Spaceman, 13:59
Re: question, Sam Wormley, 13:53
Re: Gravity, Sam Wormley, 13:52
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 13:51
Re: God is pure, donstockbauer, 13:37
Re: electron structure, Spaceman, 13:28
Re: FAQ, AndyCav, 13:28
Re: Dramatis Personae IV, donstockbauer, 13:27
Re: electron structure, Paul Cardinale, 13:24
Electrical "Shorted-Turn" Phenomena ?, Robert11, 13:24
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, donstockbauer, 13:20
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, mmeron, 13:03
Re: Dramatis Personae IV, Fabrizio J Bonsignore, 12:52
Re: Light behaving as Particle & Wave at SAME time?, Peter, 12:48
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 12:46
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 12:38
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:38
Gravity, i_cu_l8tr, 12:34
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, tadchem, 12:30
Re: FAQ, Peteris Krumins, 12:27
Re: question, Spaceman, 12:10
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:59
Re: question, asdf, 11:53
Re: question, asdf, 11:50
Re: question, srp, 11:42
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 11:39
Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity", Dirk Van de moortel, 11:33
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:31
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 11:20
"Corrections to Special Relativity", Nom, 11:12
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, Bruce Scott TOK, 11:03
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Traveler, 11:00
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, glhansen, 10:55
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, glhansen, 10:51
Re: Altered method extends bubble-fusion claim, Bruce Scott TOK, 10:38
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 Jan 06 Washington, DC, Bruce Scott TOK, 10:31
God, kstocklmeir, 10:22
Re: PROOF that space-time must be discrete and quantized., Hontas Farmer, 10:21
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:20
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:20
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Schoenfeld, 09:37
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Schoenfeld, 09:23
Re: Light behaving as Particle & Wave at SAME time?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 09:14
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Traveler, 09:01
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, Mike, 09:01
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, G. L. Bradford, 08:53
Re: Thermal expansion question, Greg Neill, 08:48
Re: Synchronization Between Pendulums, jmfbahciv, 08:47
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, jmfbahciv, 08:41
Re: question, donstockbauer, 08:37
Re: sci.crank, donstockbauer, 08:33
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, jmfbahciv, 08:31
Re: question, srp, 08:25
Re: sci.crank, T Wake, 08:17
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, Hero . van . Jindelt, 08:14
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, jmfbahciv, 08:07
Thermal expansion question, thymaridas, 07:56
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, jmfbahciv, 07:56
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, The Ghost In The Machine, 07:00
Re: automated physical dimensions and units in scientific programs, The Ghost In The Machine, 07:00
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Mdmeenken, 06:36
Re: Water is gritty., Autymn D. C., 06:35
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, G. L. Bradford, 06:32
lead x-ray fluorescence, Andreas Goedicke, 06:25
lead x-ray fluorescence, Andreas Goedicke, 06:19
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Eric Gisse, 05:37
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Eric Gisse, 05:26
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Schoenfeld, 05:09
Re: Koran and relativity <grin>, Helmut Wabnig, 05:09
FAQ, AndyCav, 04:37
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Schoenfeld, 04:35
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, Ken S. Tucker, 04:33
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, chan, 04:22
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Hexenmeister, 04:17
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 04:15
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, FrediFizzx, 04:09
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Autymn D. C., 04:05
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Autymn D. C., 03:50
Edward Witten, John Nash ("A Beautiful Mind"), And (df/dx)(dg/dx), OsherD, 03:34
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, mmeron, 03:21
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, Ken S. Tucker, 03:20
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, DougC, 03:11
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, OsherD, 03:09
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Y.Porat, 02:57
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Hexenmeister, 02:31
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, FrediFizzx, 02:11
Re: electron structure, FrediFizzx, 01:53
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Schoenfeld, 01:40
Thoughts on the 'zapper'?, Happy Hippy, 01:29
Re: Altered method extends bubble-fusion claim, Happy Hippy, 01:00
Re: automated physical dimensions and units in scientific programs, Hexenmeister, 00:53
Re: PROOF that space-time must be discrete and quantized., chan, 00:39
Re: sci.crank, LEFTY, 00:19
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, Autymn D. C., 00:13
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, Autymn D. C., 00:07

January 21, 2006

Re: Koran and relativity <grin>, donstockbauer, 23:57
Re: sci.crank, donstockbauer, 23:48
Re: question, Mark Martin, 23:31
Re: What Are the Thread-Interrupting Trolls After?, Jn, 23:29
Re: question, srp, 23:28
Re: How I Improve My Theories, Jn, 23:21
Re: How I Improve My Theories, Jn, 23:18
automated physical dimensions and units in scientific programs, Grant W. Petty, 23:10
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, LEFTY, 23:09
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Al Zenner, 23:06
Re: PROOF that space-time must be discrete and quantized., chan, 23:05
Re: PROOF that space-time must be discrete and quantized., Traveler, 23:04
Re: question, Michael Varney, 23:01
Re: PROOF that space-time must be discrete and quantized., Spaceman, 22:55
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 22:49
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Don Kelly, 22:47
Re: PROOF that space-time must be discrete and quantized., Hontas Farmer, 22:35
Re: sci.crank, Eric Gisse, 22:33
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Spaceman, 22:33
Question about liquid-gas critcal temperature, Bob Engelhardt, 22:33
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Mark Martin, 22:32
Re: PROOF that space-time must be discrete and quantized., Traveler, 22:25
Re: sci.crank, Hexenmeister, 22:23
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Hexenmeister, 22:17
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Hexenmeister, 22:12
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, tadchem, 21:56
Re: Synchronization Between Pendulums, Mark Martin, 21:47
Re: Synchronization Between Pendulums, Bret Cahill, 21:41
Re: Koran and relativity <grin>, Jn, 21:27
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 21:22
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Eric Gisse, 21:08
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 21:07
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 21:07
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, Mike, 20:53
Re: PROOF that space-time must be discrete and quantized., Spaceman, 20:45
Light behaving as Particle & Wave at SAME time?, chan, 20:44
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Hexenmeister, 20:43
Re: simultaneous wave/particle detection article, chan, 20:40
Re: PROOF that space-time must be discrete and quantized., Hontas Farmer, 20:31
Re: simultaneous wave/particle detection article, Sam Wormley, 20:18
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, LEFTY, 20:07
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, The Ghost In The Machine, 20:00
sci.crank, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 19:55
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, mmeron, 19:21
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 19:16
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:09
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 19:03
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 19:01
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 18:44
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 18:40
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 18:35
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Greg Neill, 18:34
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 18:17
Re: question, Spaceman, 18:16
Re: question, mmeron, 18:09
question, asdf, 18:05
Re: lead x-ray fluorescence, mmeron, 18:04
Re: PROOF that space-time must be discrete and quantized., ~~NoMad~~, 18:00
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, chan, 18:00
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 17:43
Re: simultaneous wave/particle detection article, chan, 17:33
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Spaceman, 17:13
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Bilge, 17:12
Koran and relativity <grin>, michalchik, 17:11
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Eric Gisse, 17:07
Re: How I Improve My Theories, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:00
Re: How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Richard Henry, 16:56
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 16:46
The Smart Science Journal, S. Enterprize Company, 16:44
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Spaceman, 16:41
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Eric Gisse, 16:39
Re: P(X-->Y)^2 = ww* iff P(A) > = 1/2 So Quantum Theory Not "Fundamental", mmeron, 16:18
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, T Wake, 15:56
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Spaceman, 15:47
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, DougC, 15:42
Re: TV shows that promote skeptical thought? Exploring the Unknown, Spaceman, 15:32
How large does a hot air balloon need to be?, Timo Nieminen, 15:23
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, donstockbauer, 15:22
Re: curses, LEFTY, 15:20
Re: How I Improve My Theories, LEFTY, 15:12
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Timo Nieminen, 15:12
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, Timo Nieminen, 15:09
Re: How I Improve My Theories, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 14:59
TV shows that promote skeptical thought? Exploring the Unknown, Robert, 14:55
Re: How I Improve My Theories, OsherD, 14:47
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 14:42
Re: HaHaHanson Knows: Laughter Proves Good Medicine for Heart, John Sefton, 14:40
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 14:29
Re: lead x-ray fluorescence, mmeron, 14:22
Re: How I Improve My Theories, LEFTY, 13:34
Re: How I Improve My Theories, OsherD, 13:16
Re: "Does God Play Dice" Reexamined, LEFTY, 13:14
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 13:11
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, OsherD, 13:04
Re: How I Improve My Theories, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 12:58
Re: What Are the Thread-Interrupting Trolls After?, OsherD, 12:48
Re: AN APOLOGY TO LISTENERS OF TALK RADIO, john_ramsden, 12:11
Re: AN APOLOGY TO LISTENERS OF TALK RADIO, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:06
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Y.Porat, 11:59
How I Improve My Theories, OsherD, 11:56
Re: Cars fitted with "adaptive cruise control" (or ACC) could help ease..., John C . Polasek, 11:52
Re: simultaneous wave/particle detection article, Sam Wormley, 11:20
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Hontas Farmer, 11:18
PROOF that space-time must be discrete and quantized., Hontas Farmer, 11:15
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, John C . Polasek, 11:14
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, srp, 11:09
Re: Synchronization Between Pendulums, Sam Wormley, 11:04
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 11:01
God likes justice, kstocklmeir, 10:56
Re: Synchronization Between Pendulums, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:54
Re: God is pure, arnsvb, 10:36
Re: P(X-->Y)^2 = ww* iff P(A) > = 1/2 So Quantum Theory Not "Fundamental", kdthrge, 10:25
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:16
Re: Synchronization Between Pendulums, Greg Neill, 10:09
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:05
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:04
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:04
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:03
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:03
Re: AN APOLOGY TO LISTENERS OF TALK RADIO, Randy Poe, 10:00
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, Eric Gisse, 09:59
Re: AN APOLOGY TO LISTENERS OF TALK RADIO, Robert J. Kolker, 09:52
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, David Thomson, 09:50
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, David Thomson, 09:36
Re: Synchronization Between Pendulums, Douglas Eagleson, 09:35
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Eric Gisse, 09:33
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 09:19
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, jmfbahciv, 09:02
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, jmfbahciv, 08:59
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Ralf, 08:53
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Hexenmeister, 08:41
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, T Wake, 08:36
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, surrealistic-dream, 08:28
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, T Wake, 08:13
"Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Nom, 07:51
simultaneous wave/particle detection article, chan, 07:35
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, dedanoe, 07:26
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Schoenfeld, 07:13
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Y.Porat, 07:04
AN APOLOGY TO LISTENERS OF TALK RADIO, Ed Conrad, 06:58
Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:47
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Hexenmeister, 06:26
Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup, hhc314, 06:20
Re: What Are the Thread-Interrupting Trolls After?, Hero . van . Jindelt, 06:04
Re: What Are the Thread-Interrupting Trolls After?, Hero . van . Jindelt, 06:01
Synchronization Between Pendulums, Bret Cahill, 05:10
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 05:02
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 04:56
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, Nick, 04:34
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 04:27
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 04:02
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 02:48
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Bilge, 02:34
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 02:26
Re: What Are the Thread-Interrupting Trolls After?, OsherD, 02:09
Re: What Are the Thread-Interrupting Trolls After?, OsherD, 02:01
Re: Altered method extends bubble-fusion claim, mmeron, 02:00
Re: What Are the Thread-Interrupting Trolls After?, OsherD, 01:41
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Hexenmeister, 01:37
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, JanPB, 01:33
Re: What Are the Thread-Interrupting Trolls After?, OsherD, 01:25
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
Re: How big is the Universe?, Hexenmeister, 00:59
To speed the search for extraterrestrial life..., Sam Wormley, 00:49
Altered method extends bubble-fusion claim, Sam Wormley, 00:45
Re: How big is the Universe?, Hexenmeister, 00:35
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without EnergySupply?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 00:31
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without EnergySupply?, Hexenmeister, 00:19

January 20, 2006

Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Schoenfeld, 23:49
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Hexenmeister, 23:48
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 23:45
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 23:34
Cars fitted with "adaptive cruise control" (or ACC) could help ease..., Sam Wormley, 23:30
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 20 January 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 23:29
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 23:21
Re: The physics of a vagina ..., LEFTY, 22:29
Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape?, Hexenmeister, 22:19
Re: God is upset a lot, LEFTY, 22:13
Re: Born's ww* Measures Relative Non-Dependence, Bleem Bleom, 22:11
Re: Born's ww* Measures Relative Non-Dependence, Bleem Bleom, 22:04
Re: "Does God Play Dice" Reexamined, Bleem Bleom, 21:59
Re: The physics of a vagina ..., donstockbauer, 21:39
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, T Wake, 21:14
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 21:05
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Eric Gisse, 21:04
A Black Box, Douglas Eagleson, 21:03
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 21:00
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 20:59
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 20:57
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Eric Gisse, 20:56
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Eric Gisse, 20:53
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 20:52
Re: Conditions for Static Equilibirium, Timo Nieminen, 20:49
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Bob Cain, 20:49
A Falsified Theory-example, Douglas Eagleson, 20:37
Re: half full or half empty, Spaceman, 20:33
Re: Conditions for Static Equilibirium, gaya . patel, 20:31
Re: half full or half empty, Sam Wormley, 20:28
half full or half empty, Spaceman, 20:10
Re: Conditions for Static Equilibirium, Timo Nieminen, 20:00
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, Spaceman, 19:59
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 19:53
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, Mark Martin, 19:49
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, Spaceman, 19:38
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Ken S. Tucker, 19:36
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:36
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, FrediFizzx, 19:32
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without EnergySupply?, Spaceman, 19:29
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 19:27
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, Mark Martin, 19:24
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 19:24
Conditions for Static Equilibirium, gaya . patel, 19:23
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, gaya . patel, 19:21
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 19:18
Re: Born's ww* Measures Relative Non-Dependence, OsherD, 19:14
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 19:07
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without EnergySupply?, Roy Jensen, 19:07
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 19:04
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 19:03
Re: Born's ww* Measures Relative Non-Dependence, OsherD, 19:02
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 19:02
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, Spaceman, 18:59
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, Spaceman, 18:57
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 18:54
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without EnergySupply?, Hexenmeister, 18:53
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without EnergySupply?, Rudi Menter, 18:51
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 18:47
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without EnergySupply?, Spaceman, 18:39
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 18:36
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:36
Re: "Does God Play Dice" Reexamined, OsherD, 18:13
Re: Bohr' model still being used, T Wake, 17:47
Re: Relativitic mass of light?, T Wake, 17:45
Re: Bohr' model still being used, PD, 17:44
Born's ww* Measures Relative Non-Dependence, OsherD, 17:43
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 Jan 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 16:44
Re: Matter bound by light, Douglas Eagleson, 16:33
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 16:26
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 16:26
Re: Bohr' model still being used, Sam Wormley, 16:23
Re: Relativistic mass of light?, Rudi Menter, 16:10
Relativitic mass of light?, Nick, 16:07
Re: Bohr' model still being used, Mark Martin, 16:02
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 16:01
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Eric Gisse, 16:00
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Eric Gisse, 15:56
Re: Bohr' model still being used, Charles, 15:56
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Salmon Egg, 15:55
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Eric Gisse, 15:55
Bohr' model still being used, John Sefton, 15:51
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, mmeron, 15:49
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, jimp, 15:45
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, Mark Martin, 15:35
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Fermat, 15:35
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 15:35
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Sam Wormley, 15:33
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 15:30
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 15:29
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, Spaceman, 15:27
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:27
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Sam Wormley, 15:23
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 15:20
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 15:20
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, Puppet_Sock, 15:15
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, Sam Wormley, 15:15
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, briggs, 15:12
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:11
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Sam Wormley, 15:08
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:08
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, Spaceman, 15:04
Re: Coal mines and missing people problem, Mark Martin, 14:59
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 14:58
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Sam Wormley, 14:55
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Spaceman, 14:53
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Sam Wormley, 14:49
Coal mines and missing people problem, Spaceman, 14:47
Re: ANOTHER APOLOGY IN ORDER, donstockbauer, 14:44
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Sam Wormley, 14:43
Re: GRAVITATION DEFINED, donstockbauer, 14:42
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, donstockbauer, 14:40
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 14:39
Re: How big is the Universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:38
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Spaceman, 14:38
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Sam Wormley, 14:35
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 14:35
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, T Wake, 14:34
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 14:31
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Sam Wormley, 14:30
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 14:26
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:24
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Spaceman, 14:23
GRAVITATION DEFINED, ACE, 14:17
ANOTHER APOLOGY IN ORDER, Ed Conrad, 14:16
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:15
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, PD, 14:13
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 14:11
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 14:04
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, Richard Henry, 14:02
Solution for gravitational Constant, Jerry, 13:55
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:52
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, John C . Polasek, 13:49
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, John C . Polasek, 13:34
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 13:32
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, mmeron, 13:27
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 13:26
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, mmeron, 13:20
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, PD, 13:16
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, briggs, 13:01
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:00
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, Greg Neill, 12:51
Re: Water is gritty., Mark Martin, 12:49
Re: How big is the Universe?, Branimir Maksimovic, 12:45
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 12:42
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 12:28
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Traveler, 12:26
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 12:24
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, RP, 12:20
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:18
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, Richard Henry, 12:17
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 12:11
Re: HaHaHanson Knows: Laughter Proves Good Medicine for Heart, hanson, 12:11
Re: How big is the Universe?, hanson, 12:11
Re: Water is gritty., hanson, 12:11
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, Spaceman, 12:11
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 12:07
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, John C . Polasek, 12:00
Re: Matter bound by light, Spaceman, 11:52
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, Mike, 11:51
Re: How big is the Universe?, Spaceman, 11:47
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, stephen, 11:47
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 11:39
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Bilge, 11:38
Re: How big is the Universe?, Branimir Maksimovic, 11:34
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Y.Porat, 11:23
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Randy Poe, 11:22
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Y.Porat, 11:21
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Sam Wormley, 11:20
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 11:09
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 11:08
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 11:01
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 10:59
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 10:47
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Don1, 10:43
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Sue..., 10:43
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Y.Porat, 10:42
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, Michael Varney, 10:30
Re: Space, Traveler, 10:25
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 10:15
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, T Wake, 10:10
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Sam Wormley, 10:02
God is upset a lot, kstocklmeir, 10:01
Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape?, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, kk, 10:00
Re: Space, Sam Wormley, 10:00
Re: Space, Sam Wormley, 09:58
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, PD, 09:53
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Don1, 09:52
Re: How big is the Universe?, Happy Hippy, 09:51
God is upset a lot, kstocklmeir, 09:49
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:48
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, Mike, 09:46
Re: Space, PD, 09:41
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Sam Wormley, 09:40
Re: Rigid Body?, John C . Polasek, 09:38
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Greg Neill, 09:36
Re: Space, Happy Hippy, 09:33
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, John C . Polasek, 09:32
"Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Nom, 09:25
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, John C . Polasek, 09:25
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Mike, 09:24
Re: How big is the Universe?, LEFTY, 09:20
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, jmfbahciv, 09:19
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, jmfbahciv, 09:16
Re: Space, Traveler, 09:13
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, John C . Polasek, 09:11
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 09:08
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, jmfbahciv, 08:54
Re: Space, Happy Hippy, 08:54
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 08:51
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, PD, 08:44
Re: Space, PD, 08:42
Re: Space, PD, 08:39
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, Autymn D. C., 08:33
Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape?, jmfbahciv, 07:51
Re: If Relativity affects time and motion, Jyrki Lahtonen, 07:47
Re: Comet samples return to Earth, jmfbahciv, 07:47
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, jmfbahciv, 07:44
If Relativity affects time and motion, Don1, 07:33
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, donstockbauer, 07:20
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, Hero . van . Jindelt, 07:08
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 07:06
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, brodders, 07:03
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, donstockbauer, 07:01
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, donstockbauer, 06:56
Re: "Osher Doctorow" cannot answer simple questions, donstockbauer, 06:46
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, dedanoe, 06:32
Re: "Osher Doctorow" cannot answer simple questions, T Wake, 06:22
Re: Water is gritty., Autymn D. C., 06:13
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Richard Herring, 06:11
Strange coincidence of dark energy/matter ratio!, ukr_bend, 06:04
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Michael Varney, 05:58
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, andy, 05:54
Matter bound by light, Michael Varney, 05:47
Re: Is non-continous calculus needed for physics?, Michael Varney, 05:44
Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape?, tadchem, 05:44
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Timo Nieminen, 05:36
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Timo Nieminen, 05:32
Re: "Does God Play Dice" Reexamined, Y.Porat, 05:25
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Timo Nieminen, 05:24
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Lloyd Parker, 04:49
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, Hexenmeister, 04:30
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 04:29
Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Autymn D. C., 04:25
Re: Water is gritty., Hexenmeister, 04:24
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 04:06
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 03:55
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, mmeron, 03:55
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, Hero . van . Jindelt, 03:53
Re: How big is the Universe?, Hexenmeister, 03:52
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 03:51
Re: "Does God Play Dice" Reexamined, OsherD, 03:35
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Ken S. Tucker, 03:23
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Hexenmeister, 03:22
"Does God Play Dice" Reexamined, OsherD, 03:18
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, The Ghost In The Machine, 03:00
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Hero . van . Jindelt, 03:00
Re: Born's Quantum Probability Cancels Out in [P(X-->Y)]^2, OsherD, 02:56
excellent free website on relativity and light, yoyodog, 02:55
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 02:45
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, hanson, 02:42
Born's Quantum Probability Cancels Out in [P(X-->Y)]^2, OsherD, 02:38
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Hexenmeister, 02:31
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 02:27
Re: Water is gritty., hanson, 02:27
Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape?, Hexenmeister, 02:25
Re: Osher Doctorow Doesn't Answer Trolls, OsherD, 02:18
Re: P(X-->Y)^2 = ww* iff P(A) > = 1/2 So Quantum Theory Not "Fundamental", OsherD, 01:54
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 01:33
Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 01:27
Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 01:27
Re: P(X-->Y)^2 = ww* iff P(A) > = 1/2 So Quantum Theory Not "Fundamental", OsherD, 01:05
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 00:51
P(X-->Y)^2 = ww* iff P(A) > = 1/2 So Quantum Theory Not "Fundamental", OsherD, 00:47
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Sam Wormley, 00:44
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, RP, 00:28
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, Eric Gisse, 00:10
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 00:09
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Y.Porat, 00:08
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Hexenmeister, 00:08

January 19, 2006

Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Timo Nieminen, 23:56
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 23:55
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, kenneth . bull, 23:55
Re: How big is the Universe?, Branimir Maksimovic, 23:54
Re: Space, Traveler, 23:53
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, kenneth . bull, 23:50
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Sam Wormley, 23:50
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, kenneth . bull, 23:46
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, RP, 23:39
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 23:39
Re: Rigid Body?, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:39
Re: Space, Sam Wormley, 23:35
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:35
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 23:35
Re: Space, Happy Hippy, 23:34
Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, Sam Wormley, 23:34
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, Timo Nieminen, 23:27
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, mmeron, 23:27
Matter bound by light, Sam Wormley, 23:26
resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent, kenneth . bull, 23:26
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:22
Re: Rigid Body?, Timo Nieminen, 23:20
Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:15
Re: Space, Bob Cain, 23:13
Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, donstockbauer, 22:54
Is non-continous calculus needed for physics?, i . love . jeevitha, 22:52
Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?, gaya . patel, 22:47
Rigid Body?, gaya . patel, 22:46
Re: God doedn't play dice, platopes, 22:32
Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape?, tadchem, 22:30
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, Tom Roberts, 22:27
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, RP, 22:19
Re: projectile motion?, Hexenmeister, 22:16
Re: God is upset a lot, LEFTY, 22:03
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Hexenmeister, 21:58
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Hexenmeister, 21:55
Re: God doedn't play dice, LEFTY, 21:51
Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape?, Hexenmeister, 21:44
Re: Osher Doctorow Doesn't Answer Trolls, donstockbauer, 21:37
Re: God is upset a lot, donstockbauer, 21:34
P{(n-1)X --> Y} As An Intermediate Step in PI-Complex Relationships, OsherD, 21:31
Re: God is upset a lot, LEFTY, 21:29
Re: Renormalization revisited, wg, 21:27
Re: Renormalization revisited, Spaceman, 21:27
Re: Renormalization revisited, helloworld, 21:19
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Bob Cain, 21:17
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Hexenmeister, 21:14
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 21:14
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 21:08
Osher Doctorow Doesn't Answer Trolls, OsherD, 21:04
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, JanPB, 21:01
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Hexenmeister, 20:47
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, John C . Polasek, 20:43
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 20:38
Re: HaHaHanson Knows: Laughter Proves Good Medicine for Heart, Happy Hippy, 20:31
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 20:31
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 20:29
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 20:29
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 20:23
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 20:20
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 20:16
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:15
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 20:11
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, Autymn D. C., 20:03
Re: projectile motion?, Greg Neill, 19:57
Re: Cross-Field antenna, Rich The Philosophizer, 19:56
projectile motion?, Jonny2112, 19:43
Re: Acoustic Waves, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:33
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, Autymn D. C., 19:33
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 19:33
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 19:30
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, Autymn D. C., 19:24
Re: troll, AndyCav, 19:23
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 19:05
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 18:59
Re: Space, Traveler, 18:58
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, mmeron, 18:33
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 18:33
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 18:27
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 18:25
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 18:24
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 18:17
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Ken S. Tucker, 18:15
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Bilge, 18:04
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 18:01
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:51
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 17:50
Re: Comet samples return to Earth, Michael Varney, 17:43
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 17:42
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 17:40
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 17:38
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 17:38
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 17:35
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, mmeron, 17:33
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 17:29
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, mmeron, 17:26
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 17:25
Re: God is upset a lot, Mark Martin, 17:22
Re: Water is gritty., Autymn D. C., 17:21
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, mmeron, 17:21
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 17:18
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Sam Wormley, 17:12
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, FrediFizzx, 17:03
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 17:03
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 17:00
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, FrediFizzx, 16:50
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Sam Wormley, 16:50
"Osher Doctorow" cannot answer simple questions, James Fbrtzh, 16:46
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 16:44
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, markwh04, 16:44
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, John C . Polasek, 16:43
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, Henry, 16:40
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, Ken S. Tucker, 16:39
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, markwh04, 16:37
Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape?, tadchem, 16:37
Re: Stop Global Warming Virtual March, tadchem, 16:31
Re: God is upset a lot, T Wake, 16:26
Re: Stop Virtual March on Global Warming, hanson, 16:14
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Hexenmeister, 16:12
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Hexenmeister, 16:10
Re: Stop Virtual March on Global Warming, Hexenmeister, 16:09
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Greg Neill, 16:08
Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Spaceman, 16:06
Re: Space, Mike, 16:04
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 15:56
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, Mike, 15:55
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 15:51
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 15:50
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, JanPB, 15:50
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Timo Nieminen, 15:45
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 15:43
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 15:42
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 15:41
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 15:34
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, dedanoe, 15:27
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 15:24
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 15:23
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 15:22
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 15:15
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 15:09
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:08
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:08
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, PD, 15:07
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, kk, 15:06
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Michael J. Strickland, 15:05
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:03
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, mmeron, 15:01
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:01
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, Paul Cardinale, 14:59
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Michael J. Strickland, 14:54
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, mmeron, 14:43
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 14:43
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 14:41
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, John C . Polasek, 14:39
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Joe Fischer, 14:35
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 14:35
Re: Space, PD, 14:32
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 14:26
Re: Renormalization revisited, wg, 14:21
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 14:19
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 762 January 19, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 14:17
Re: Stop Virtual March on Global Warming, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 14:13
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 14:12
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 14:12
Re: Jim Fbrtzh Thread-Pest, OsherD, 14:08
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 14:07
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 14:07
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Greg Neill, 14:07
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Edwards, 14:04
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 14:04
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Michael J. Strickland, 14:03
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, G. L. Bradford, 13:59
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 13:55
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 13:55
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 13:53
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 13:52
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, Puppet_Sock, 13:50
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Spaceman, 13:50
Renormalization revisited, wg, 13:47
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 13:46
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, JMA, 13:45
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Spaceman, 13:43
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 13:41
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 13:39
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 13:39
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 13:36
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Bilge, 13:23
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Hexenmeister, 13:07
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Bilge, 13:01
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 12:59
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, stephen, 12:58
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, franklinhu, 12:57
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, Richard Henry, 12:54
Re: Space, Traveler, 12:53
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 12:53
Re: The physics behind depth-of-field...?, Andy Resnick, 12:44
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Richard Henry, 12:42
Re: Space, PD, 12:33
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Harry, 12:32
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, MobyDikc, 12:23
Re: Gravity Vs inertia., Jerry, 12:17
Re: TOE Wiki, srp, 12:13
Re: What's the Plasma in a Plasma Display?, Hexenmeister, 11:59
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 11:57
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, onehappymadman, 11:57
Re: The physics behind depth-of-field...?, BD, 11:56
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 11:50
Re: Molecular physics simulations, Marvin, 11:44
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 11:44
Re: Space, Traveler, 11:39
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, Hexenmeister, 11:36
TOE Wiki, tycho bracket, 11:25
Re: Comet samples return to Earth, jmfbahciv, 11:21
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, PD, 11:19
Re: Space, Happy Hippy, 11:10
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 11:03
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, PD, 11:03
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Y.Porat, 11:02
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Hexenmeister, 10:58
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, John C . Polasek, 10:55
Re: Space, Traveler, 10:40
Re: God is upset a lot, Mark Martin, 10:23
Re: Space, Traveler, 10:21
Re: Space, Traveler, 10:18
God is upset a lot, kstocklmeir, 10:13
God is upset a lot, kstocklmeir, 10:12
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, Hero . van . Jindelt, 10:09
Re: Complex Multiplication vs Probable Influence Multiplication Related 2: Grassmann Numbers, Henry, 10:08
Re: Geometric Form, Orion, 10:03
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:03
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:01
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:01
Re: God is pure, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:01
Re: Space, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:59
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:56
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, CWatters, 09:55
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, John Freeman, PHD, 09:51
Re: Topological Basis of Physics, John Freeman, PHD, 09:49
"The Matter of "Dark Matter", Nom, 09:47
Re: Jim Fbrtzh Thread-Pest, John Freeman, PHD, 09:39
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 09:37
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, Rene Tschaggelar, 09:35
Re: Space, Orion, 09:32
Re: Topological Basis of Physics, John Freeman, PHD, 09:32
Re: Space, Traveler, 09:27
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:26
Re: Complex Multiplication vs Probable Influence Multiplication Related 2: Grassmann Numbers, John Freeman, PHD, 09:26
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 09:25
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, Ludwig Prozz, 09:20
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Sue..., 09:09
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, briggs, 09:01
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, Bruce Scott TOK, 08:58
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, Bruce Scott TOK, 08:56
Re: Space, Orion, 08:34
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 08:29
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, kk, 08:27
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Traveler, 08:25
Re: machine with 600% ideal efficiency, Michael Varney, 08:24
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 08:21
machine with 600% ideal efficiency, dedanoe, 07:50
Re: Comet samples return to Earth, Michael Varney, 07:15
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 06:59
Re: Stop Virtual March on Global Warming, Ronald Maldonado, 06:26
Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2, Mike Jr., 05:14
Re: God creates justice, Hexenmeister, 04:54
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Hexenmeister, 04:50
Re: Why do metals reflect light?, Hexenmeister, 04:43
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 04:41
Re: Why do metals reflect light?, hanson, 04:36
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 04:30
Re: Why do metals reflect light?, Bruno, 04:23
Re: Why do metals reflect light?, Bruno, 04:23
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 04:18
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 04:16
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, hanson, 04:11
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, hanson, 04:11
Re: Why do metals reflect light?, hanson, 03:46
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 03:42
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Schoenfeld, 03:25
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Bob Cain, 03:18
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 03:18
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 03:13
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 03:12
Re: Topological Basis of Physics, OsherD, 03:01
Re: Complex Multiplication vs Probable Influence Multiplication Related 2: Grassmann Numbers, OsherD, 02:56
Complex Multiplication vs Probable Influence Multiplication Related 2: Grassmann Numbers, OsherD, 02:50
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, FrediFizzx, 02:50
Re: Stop Virtual March on Global Warming, hanson, 02:39
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 02:39
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, hanson, 02:39
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, hanson, 02:39
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 02:39
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, hanson, 02:39
Re: Stop Global Warming Virtual March, hanson, 02:39
Re: Water is gritty., hanson, 02:39
Re: quantum: exponentiated operator?, Tobin Fricke, 02:39
Topological Basis of Physics, OsherD, 02:08
Jim Fbrtzh Thread-Pest, OsherD, 01:54
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., T Wake, 01:52
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, franklinhu, 01:52
troll, dej4, 01:39
Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape?, Daniel Joseph Min, 01:38
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 01:37
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 01:15
Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 01:15
(SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 01:15
Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 01:15
Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 01:15
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 00:36
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 00:35
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 00:33
Re: What's the Plasma in a Plasma Display?, Timo Nieminen, 00:25
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 00:17
Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape?, Jack Sarfatti, 00:15
What's the Plasma in a Plasma Display?, W. Watson, 00:15
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., Sam Wormley, 00:06
Re: The truth behind Black Holes, Sam Wormley, 00:02
Re: Molecular physics simulations, srp, 00:02

January 18, 2006

Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Sam Wormley, 23:57
Re: Space, Sam Wormley, 23:49
Molecular physics simulations, Mark-T, 23:48
Re: Water is gritty., Autymn D. C., 23:38
Re: "Shape has no meaning at the quantum level.", Happy Hippy, 23:27
Re: Space, Happy Hippy, 23:22
Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 23:22
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, Sam Wormley, 23:22
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Schoenfeld, 23:21
Re: God doedn't play dice, Traveler, 23:03
Re: The physics behind depth-of-field...?, Sam Wormley, 22:55
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., JMA, 22:51
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 22:49
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 22:33
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Eric Gisse, 22:28
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 22:24
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 22:12
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, srp, 22:11
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 22:07
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 22:01
Re: Why do metals reflect light?, Timo Nieminen, 21:44
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, Hexenmeister, 21:42
Re: The physics behind depth-of-field...?, Hexenmeister, 21:32
Re: Why do metals reflect light?, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:19
Re: Why do metals reflect light?, Timo Nieminen, 21:13
Re: God creates justice, phy, 21:08
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:05
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 21:03
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, John C . Polasek, 20:39
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Jim Black, 20:37
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Jim Black, 20:31
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 20:30
RE: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, S D Rodrian, 20:26
Re: What about lcd hi definition ebooks ?, Hexenmeister, 20:25
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 20:24
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, Ken S. Tucker, 20:12
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, brodders, 20:09
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 20:08
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 20:00
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, Hexenmeister, 19:57
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, tadchem, 19:56
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 19:49
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 19:49
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 19:46
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, Ken S. Tucker, 19:42
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Timo Nieminen, 19:40
The physics behind depth-of-field...?, BD, 19:39
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, PD, 19:39
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 19:34
Re: What about lcd hi definition ebooks ?, jimp, 19:30
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Traveler, 19:18
Re: Cross-Field antenna, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 19:14
Re: The truth behind Black Holes, Happy Hippy, 19:10
Re: Comet samples return to Earth, Spaceman, 19:06
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 19:03
Re: Asymptotic expansion of a flat universe, mmeron, 18:59
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, FrediFizzx, 18:58
Asymptotic expansion of a flat universe, David R Tribble, 18:49
Re: Comet samples return to Earth, Jim Fbrtzh, 18:49
Re: The Energy Square., Timo Nieminen, 18:42
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 18:36
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, RP, 18:34
Re: What about lcd hi definition ebooks ?, Timo Nieminen, 18:30
Re: Probable Influence/Causation Minus Conditional Probability Theorem, Jim Fbrtzh, 18:29
Re: The Energy Square., Timo Nieminen, 18:23
Re: Probable Influence/Causation Minus Conditional Probability Theorem 2: Singularities Cause Expansion-Contraction, Jim Fbrtzh, 18:19
Re: Complex Multiplication vs Probable Influence Multiplication Related, James Fbrtzh, 18:12
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, franklinhu, 18:04
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:03
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Michael Varney, 17:58
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 17:53
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 17:51
Re: Congrads Fred and Andy, Sam Wormley, 17:47
Re: The Energy Square., Timo Nieminen, 17:43
Congrads Fred and Andy, Ken S. Tucker, 17:32
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 17:32
Re: The Energy Square., Timo Nieminen, 17:25
Comet samples return to Earth, Sam Wormley, 17:23
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 17:09
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Timo Nieminen, 17:02
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Spaceman, 17:01
Re: The Energy Square., Timo Nieminen, 16:55
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 16:46
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, John C . Polasek, 16:31
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Sam Wormley, 16:24
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Traveler, 16:14
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 16:09
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, John C . Polasek, 16:08
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 16:05
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Sam Wormley, 16:05
Using Numbers for Exlporation, 333 . thirty . 333, 16:00
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 15:58
Re: The Theist's Boundless Faith in stupidity, Spaceman, 15:50
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Hexenmeister, 15:43
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 15:41
Re: The Energy Square., Timo Nieminen, 15:29
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 15:26
Re: quantum: exponentiated operator?, CausallyDisconnected, 15:22
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 15:19
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, franklinhu, 15:17
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., T Wake, 15:02
Re: quantum: exponentiated operator?, CausallyDisconnected, 15:01
Re: massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:59
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 14:58
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, JanPB, 14:55
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:53
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 14:46
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 14:44
Re: dedanoe at the beginning, Bob Cain, 14:42
FPOTD # 10, Microwaved Nuts (PIC) 1/18/2006, Michael Varney, 14:41
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 14:38
Re: The Energy Square., Timo Nieminen, 14:36
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Hexenmeister, 14:36
Re: 50% OF the rest is just plain stupid, T Wake, 14:31
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 14:28
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Bob Cain, 14:27
massless photons of momentum=h/l . the hidden mass revealed, Spaceman, 14:24
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Sam Wormley, 14:18
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 14:13
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 14:08
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, hanson, 14:07
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 14:03
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, PD, 13:59
Re: Is time dilation real?, Bob Cain, 13:59
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, Hexenmeister, 13:58
how to form a slater determinant HELP., mark, 13:54
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Hexenmeister, 13:50
Re: HaHaHanson Knows: Laughter Proves Good Medicine for Heart, hanson, 13:47
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, kk, 13:23
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, hanson, 13:21
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, mmeron, 13:19
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, Spaceman, 13:18
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, hanson, 13:11
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, mmeron, 13:06
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, Immortalist, 12:52
Re: Lorentz Violation of the Standard Model, Hexenmeister, 12:48
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Spaceman, 12:37
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Double-A, 12:32
Re: U.S. nuclear forces, 2006, Sam Wormley, 12:31
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Spaceman, 12:19
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Spaceman, 12:12
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Y.Porat, 12:12
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, srp, 12:11
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 12:06
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 12:04
Re: Lorentz Violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon, 12:04
Re: Water is gritty., The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
Re: Water is gritty., The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
Re: Is time dilation real?, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Spaceman, 11:57
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Spaceman, 11:56
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, MobyDikc, 11:55
dedanoe at the beginning, dedanoe, 11:55
Re: U.S. nuclear forces, 2006, Spaceman, 11:44
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 11:41
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 11:40
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 11:38
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 11:38
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 11:30
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 11:28
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, sdrodrian, 11:28
Re: Probable Influence/Causation Minus Conditional Probability Theorem 2: Singularities Cause Expansion-Contraction, OsherD, 11:16
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, Hexenmeister, 11:15
Probable Influence/Causation Minus Conditional Probability Theorem 2: Singularities Cause Expansion-Contraction, OsherD, 11:08
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, Staky Mustaky Strikinaky, 11:01
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, PD, 11:00
Re: Lorentz Violation of the Standard Model, Hexenmeister, 10:59
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:59
Re: Complex Multiplication vs Probable Influence Multiplication Related, OsherD, 10:51
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Edwards, 10:46
U.S. nuclear forces, 2006, Sam Wormley, 10:45
Re: Stop Global Warming Virtual March, Puppet_Sock, 10:36
Re: Complex Multiplication vs Probable Influence Multiplication Related, OsherD, 10:33
Re: HaHaHanson Knows: Laughter Proves Good Medicine for Heart, Jan Panteltje, 10:27
Re: Complex Multiplication vs Probable Influence Multiplication Related, OsherD, 10:23
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, shevek, 10:15
Re: Stop Global Warming Virtual March, Frithiof Andreas Jensen, 10:14
HaHaHanson Knows: Laughter Proves Good Medicine for Heart, Sam Wormley, 10:13
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., PD, 10:10
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Hexenmeister, 10:07
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:04
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Greysky, 10:03
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:03
curses, kstocklmeir, 10:02
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, shevek, 09:58
Re: Water is gritty., Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 09:54
curses, kstocklmeir, 09:46
Re: How else than by comparison, Don1, 09:38
Re: How else than by comparison, Andy Resnick, 09:35
Re: Complex Multiplication vs Probable Influence Multiplication Related, Mat Hogen, 09:26
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Hexenmeister, 09:26
Re: How else than by comparison, Andy Resnick, 09:25
Re: Acoustic Waves, Andy Resnick, 09:19
"Gravity", Nom, 09:12
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 09:06
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 08:56
Re: Is time dilation real?, PD, 08:54
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, chan, 08:51
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, RP, 08:50
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, REVOLVER45, 08:37
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., Mike, 08:10
Re: How else than by comparison, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 07:57
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, jmfbahciv, 07:53
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, jmfbahciv, 07:51
Re: Is time dilation real?, Greg Neill, 07:37
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Richard Herring, 07:34
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Schoenfeld, 07:08
Re: Water is gritty., Autymn D. C., 07:04
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 06:30
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Y.Porat, 06:02
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., Dirk Van de moortel, 05:37
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 05:27
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, G. L. Bradford, 05:17
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Sue..., 05:11
Lorentz Violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon, 04:57
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, brian a m stuckless, 04:51
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, Bret Cahill, 04:44
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 04:27
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, Hero . van . Jindelt, 04:22
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Bob Cain, 04:16
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, BernardZ, 04:12
Re: Is time dilation real?, Bob Cain, 04:11
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 03:50
Re: quantum: exponentiated operator?, Rod, 03:39
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 03:37
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, tadchem, 03:31
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, tadchem, 03:30
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, Bill Hobba, 03:10
Re: Water is gritty., The Ghost In The Machine, 03:00
Re: Space, Aetherist, 02:28
Re: Complex Multiplication vs Probable Influence Multiplication Related, OsherD, 02:21
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Y.Porat, 02:16
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:14
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Bilge, 02:08
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, mmeron, 02:08
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Bilge, 02:05
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, nightbat, 01:54
Complex Multiplication vs Probable Influence Multiplication Related, OsherD, 01:44
quantum: exponentiated operator?, Tobin Fricke, 01:37
Re: Probable Influence/Causation Minus Conditional Probability Theorem, OsherD, 01:09
Re: Probable Influence/Causation Minus Conditional Probability Theorem, OsherD, 01:03
Re: Is time dilation real?, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
Re: Is time dilation real?, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
Re: Model rockets and teaching physics: Suggestions?, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
Probable Influence/Causation Minus Conditional Probability Theorem, OsherD, 00:40
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, RP, 00:37
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, RP, 00:29
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, Hexenmeister, 00:23
Re: Stop Global Warming Virtual March, Hexenmeister, 00:16
Re: Space, Sam Wormley, 00:09
Re: black holes, Mark Martin, 00:01

January 17, 2006

Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, mmeron, 23:47
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, Mark Martin, 23:47
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, RP, 23:34
Re: "Shape has no meaning at the quantum level.", Happy Hippy, 23:32
Re: Space, Happy Hippy, 23:27
Re: How else than by comparison, donstockbauer, 23:22
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, Tom Roberts, 23:21
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, donstockbauer, 23:09
Re: Mechanical advantage, pulleys, Timo Nieminen, 23:07
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, donstockbauer, 23:06
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Henri Wilson, 22:57
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, Javriol, 22:53
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 22:50
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Timo Nieminen, 22:50
Re: The Energy Square., Timo Nieminen, 22:48
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., JMA, 22:45
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, REVOLVER45, 22:45
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 22:33
Re: Model rockets and teaching physics: Suggestions?, Mark Martin, 22:28
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, Sam Wormley, 22:28
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Hexenmeister, 22:27
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, REVOLVER45, 22:26
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., tj Frazir, 22:23
Re: Model rockets and teaching physics: Suggestions?, Spaceman, 22:21
Re: Course on skepticism (using Mythbusters), Mark Martin, 22:20
Re: 45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, Bret Cahill, 22:12
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 22:11
Re: To late to save civilisation, tj Frazir, 22:10
45Revolver: Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Signals Faster than the Speed of Light, REVOLVER45, 22:07
Re: Model rockets and teaching physics: Suggestions?, tj Frazir, 22:06
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 22:04
Re: The Energy Square., tj Frazir, 22:03
Re: How else than by comparison, Don1, 22:00
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 21:59
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 21:58
Mechanical advantage, pulleys, smell, 21:54
Re: The Energy Square., Timo Nieminen, 21:53
Re: 50% OF the rest is just plain stupid, tj Frazir, 21:50
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Timo Nieminen, 21:48
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, MarkA, 21:47
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 21:45
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Spaceman, 21:41
Re: The Energy Square., Timo Nieminen, 21:39
Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science, Timo Nieminen, 21:34
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., Hexenmeister, 21:31
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 21:18
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, Mark Martin, 21:07
Re: The Energy Square., Timo Nieminen, 20:57
Re: curses, Jim Black, 20:54
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Art Deco, 20:52
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Art Deco, 20:51
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Art Deco, 20:49
Course on skepticism (using Mythbusters), Robert, 20:27
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., donstockbauer, 20:24
Re: coherent electromagnetic radiation -- generated -- crystalline materials when they are subjected to a shock wave, Autymn D. C., 20:21
Model rockets and teaching physics: Suggestions?, Robert, 20:21
Water is gritty., Autymn D. C., 20:17
Stop Global Warming Virtual March, singularity, 20:07
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., dmtbgv, 19:59
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 19:57
Re: The truth behind Black Holes, Sam Wormley, 19:16
Re: Space, Sam Wormley, 19:13
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, hanson, 19:03
Re: OT apparently - Re: German blueprints :-), hanson, 19:02
The truth behind Black Holes, Happy Hippy, 19:00
Re: Space, Happy Hippy, 18:59
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, Javriol, 18:58
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 18:36
coherent electromagnetic radiation -- generated -- crystalline materials when they are subjected to a shock wave, Sam Wormley, 18:25
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 18:23
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:20
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 18:16
Re: The Energy Square., AndyCav, 18:15
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 18:12
Re: The Energy Square., Spaceman, 18:11
Re: begining question on Quantum field theory, Eugene Stefanovich, 18:04
Re: Acoustic Waves, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:02
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, Elmer, 17:59
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, Aråchñomâniâ, 17:57
Re: black holes, Happy Hippy, 17:30
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., Bob Cain, 17:30
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 17:15
Re: God doedn't play dice, platopes, 17:08
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., PD, 16:54
Re: Why doesn't the sky go green before it goes red ni the evening?, tadchem, 16:49
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, kk, 16:49
Re: Triplet Paradox, AndyCav, 16:48
Re: The coming asteroid, Mark Martin, 16:38
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, Chris H. Fleming, 16:34
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, John Kennaugh, 16:30
The coming asteroid, FED UP, 16:30
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, tadchem, 16:17
Event-Symmetric Space-Time, Phil, 16:17
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., Hexenmeister, 16:14
Re: Particle Decay, Hexenmeister, 16:11
Re: OT apparently - Re: German blueprints :-), Hexenmeister, 16:09
Re: Space, Hexenmeister, 16:05
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Hexenmeister, 15:51
Re: begining question on Quantum field theory, Puppet_Sock, 15:47
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Hexenmeister, 15:47
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, Hexenmeister, 15:45
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 15:23
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 15:20
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Hexenmeister, 15:18
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 15:13
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, Mark Martin, 15:08
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, kk, 15:02
Re: begining question on Quantum field theory, markwh04, 15:01
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, mmeron, 14:41
It does too. (was: Why doesn't the sky go green before it goes red...), markwh04, 14:36
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, AndyCav, 14:28
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, G. L. Bradford, 14:16
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, Christopher A . Lee, 14:14
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, Aråchñomâniâ, 14:13
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, Mark Martin, 13:54
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., PD, 13:48
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Orion, 13:36
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, PD, 13:33
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, PD, 13:28
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, stephen, 13:25
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, MobyDikc, 13:21
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, mmeron, 13:20
Re: Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, PD, 13:06
Re: Triplet Paradox, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:01
Re: physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, Elmer, 12:57
Re: Bullshit in physics, Aladar, 12:54
Re: Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, hanson, 12:54
Re: OT apparently - Re: German blueprints :-), hanson, 12:54
Re: Triplet Paradox, AndyCav, 12:53
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Spaceman, 12:49
Antirelativists Wikipedia Topic, MobyDikc, 12:48
Re: God is pure, donstockbauer, 12:40
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Michael J. Strickland, 12:36
Re: Space, donstockbauer, 12:32
Re: Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, srp, 12:26
Re: Space, Sam Wormley, 12:17
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Greg Neill, 12:05
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Boris Mohar, 11:46
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, hanson, 11:39
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 11:39
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 11:39
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Greg Neill, 11:39
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 11:38
curses, kstocklmeir, 11:19
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 11:08
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 10:58
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., dmtbgv, 10:56
Re: temperature delta when testing at cold and hot, Puppet_Sock, 10:46
CFP: The 2006 IAENG International Workshop on Financial Engineering (of IMECS 2006), imecs2006, 10:36
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 10:31
Re: Cross-Field antenna, jimp, 10:20
Re: How else than by comparison, jimp, 10:20
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., dmtbgv, 10:18
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 10:17
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 10:14
Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Eric Gisse, 10:12
Re: Is time dilation real?, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
Re: Liberals powerless to stop Conservatives, Orion, 09:48
Re: How else than by comparison, Andy Resnick, 09:44
"Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Nom, 09:41
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 09:39
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., PD, 09:34
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Greg Neill, 09:31
Re: Acoustic Waves, Andy Resnick, 09:18
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., dmtbgv, 08:55
Re: A few basic physics Qs, Andy Resnick, 08:54
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 08:52
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, jmfbahciv, 08:33
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, jmfbahciv, 08:26
Re: Work, gravity, potential energy, donstockbauer, 08:22
Uses of The 4th Dimension (Einsteins was WRONG!), use4d, 07:40
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Bruce Scott TOK, 07:29
Re: black holes, Happy Hippy, 07:22
Re: What's the fundamental reason for electric current?, rusty, 07:01
temperature delta when testing at cold and hot, inquisitive, 06:47
Particle Decay, Andy, 06:46
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Y.Porat, 06:44
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Double-A, 06:36
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Y.Porat, 06:09
Fair pro + contra with the Newton twins, Hero . van . Jindelt, 06:04
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 05:12
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Double-A, 04:52
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, nightbat, 04:18
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Roger Beresford, 04:15
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 04:01
Re: OT apparently - Re: German blueprints :-), Hero . van . Jindelt, 03:49
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Bob Cain, 03:26
Space, Ashish, 03:25
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 03:23
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Y.Porat, 02:44
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 02:30
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 02:20
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, hanson, 02:20
Electron orbit distance can be explained by constant minimum spacing of aether, franklinhu, 02:18
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, nightbat, 01:46
Re: Cross-Field antenna, Naebad, 01:22
Re: Statistical Dependence in PI vs Conditional Probability/Bayesian, OsherD, 01:03
Re: Acoustic Waves, Hexenmeister, 01:01
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Richard Henry, 00:53
Re: Statistical Dependence in PI vs Conditional Probability/Bayesian, OsherD, 00:30
Re: Work, gravity, potential energy, Matthew Lybanon, 00:30
SFT vs QFT and GR, tony fleming, 00:21
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Greg Neill, 00:19
Re: Acoustic Waves, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:04

January 16, 2006

Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 23:56
Re: Statistical Dependence in PI vs Conditional Probability/Bayesian, OsherD, 23:54
Re: Is time dilation real?, Eric Gisse, 23:43
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 23:40
Re: black holes, Sam Wormley, 23:38
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 23:33
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 23:26
Re: Statistical Dependence in PI vs Conditional Probability/Bayesian, OsherD, 23:25
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:22
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 23:11
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 23:08
Re: What's the fundamental reason for electric current?, donstockbauer, 22:50
Re: Basic Scientific Inference and Fallacy, donstockbauer, 22:36
Re: Basic Scientific Inference and Fallacy, Mathue Hagen, 22:33
Re: black holes, Happy Hippy, 22:28
Statistical Dependence in PI vs Conditional Probability/Bayesian, OsherD, 22:08
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 22:08
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Autymn D. C., 21:55
Re: What's the fundamental reason for electric current?, Autymn D. C., 21:45
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 21:43
Re: What's the fundamental reason for electric current?, Autymn D. C., 21:39
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 21:38
Re: What's the fundamental reason for electric current?, Autymn D. C., 21:37
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 21:36
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 21:29
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 21:23
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., dmtbgv, 21:22
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 21:20
Re: Cross-Field antenna, Ken Smith, 21:19
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 21:18
Re: Acoustic Waves, Hexenmeister, 21:17
Re: Perfect Mirrors and Black Holes, Hexenmeister, 21:14
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, Autymn D. C., 21:10
Re: Basic Scientific Inference and Fallacy, donstockbauer, 21:06
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 20:55
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 20:43
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 20:39
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 20:36
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, chan, 20:29
Re: Triplet Paradox, Hexenmeister, 20:28
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Greg Neill, 20:25
Re: Why do metals reflect light?, Mathue Hagen, 20:18
Basic Scientific Inference and Fallacy, Douglas Eagleson, 20:16
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 20:11
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 19:55
Re: Work, gravity, potential energy, kdthrge, 19:51
Re: black holes, Al Zenner, 19:47
Re: black holes, Eric Gisse, 19:41
Re: black holes, Mark Martin, 19:41
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 19:37
Re: black holes, lbjohnson1949, 19:32
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., dmtbgv, 19:30
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 19:30
Re: Acoustic Waves, Timo Nieminen, 19:29
Re: black holes, lbjohnson1949, 19:25
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, AndyCav, 19:23
Re: OT apparently - Re: German blueprints :-), hanson, 19:01
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 19:01
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 19:01
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 19:01
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 19:01
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 19:00
Re: curses, Jim Black, 18:40
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 18:35
Re: First the BULLSHIT (Evolution), Then the TRUTH (Man as Old as Coal)..., Mark Martin, 18:27
Re: Why do metals reflect light?, Timo Nieminen, 18:25
Re: Angular Momentum Resonance question, Jim Black, 18:25
Re: black holes, Happy Hippy, 18:25
Re: First the BULLSHIT (Evolution), Then the TRUTH (Man as Old as Coal)..., edconrad, 18:21
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Mark Martin, 18:13
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Ken S. Tucker, 18:12
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 18:09
Re: Why do metals reflect light?, Orion, 18:05
Why do metals reflect light?, Gregory L. Hansen, 18:02
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Ken S. Tucker, 17:52
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 17:50
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, chan, 17:43
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 17:37
Re: Acoustic Waves, Sam Wormley, 17:37
Re: First the BULLSHIT (Evolution), Then the TRUTH (Man as Old as Coal)..., CWatters, 17:31
Re: Cross-Field antenna, ehsjr, 17:30
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:28
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, G. L. Bradford, 17:28
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Gregory L. Hansen, 17:25
Angular Momentum Resonance question, chan, 17:23
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Tom Roberts, 17:21
Perfect Mirrors and Black Holes, Physitrex, 17:10
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 17:07
Acoustic Waves, Physitrex, 17:04
Re: an electron question, srp, 17:02
Re: A few basic physics Qs, Ken S. Tucker, 16:53
Re: Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 16:32
Re: First the BULLSHIT (Evolution), Then the TRUTH (Man as Old as Coal)..., Pushmi-Pullyu, 16:25
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Traveler, 16:24
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Orion, 16:18
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Traveler, 16:17
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 16:13
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Traveler, 16:12
Re: First the BULLSHIT (Evolution), Then the TRUTH (Man as Old as Coal)..., Mark Martin, 16:08
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 16:07
Re: Is length contraction real?, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:06
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 16:05
Re: First the BULLSHIT (Evolution), Then the TRUTH (Man as Old as Coal)..., Mark Martin, 16:03
Re: A few basic physics Qs, Hexenmeister, 15:59
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 15:55
Re: First the BULLSHIT (Evolution), Then the TRUTH (Man as Old as Coal)..., Steve Hayes, 15:50
Re: First the BULLSHIT (Evolution), Then the TRUTH (Man as Old as Coal)..., Steve Hayes, 15:50
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Mark Martin, 15:41
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Timo Nieminen, 15:36
Re: Is length contraction real?, Timo Nieminen, 15:25
Re: black holes, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:17
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Tom Roberts, 15:05
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Orion, 15:04
Re: First the BULLSHIT (Evolution), Then the TRUTH (Man as Old as Coal)..., Steve Hayes, 14:54
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Sam Wormley, 14:53
Re: How else than by comparison, Don1, 14:51
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Mike, 14:49
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, PD, 14:40
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Mark Martin, 14:39
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Orion, 14:36
Re: First the BULLSHIT (Evolution), Then the TRUTH (Man as Old as Coal)..., donstockbauer, 14:35
Re: black holes, lbjohnson1949, 14:34
First the BULLSHIT (Evolution), Then the TRUTH (Man as Old as Coal)..., edconrad, 14:31
Re: black holes, lbjohnson1949, 14:28
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Sam Wormley, 14:24
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 14:19
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., PD, 14:12
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, Hexenmeister, 14:06
Re: Cross-Field antenna, Mark Zenier, 14:04
Re: Cross-Field antenna, Dave Holford, 13:59
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, mmeron, 13:52
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 13:49
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 13:41
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 13:38
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 13:36
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 13:34
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Mark Martin, 13:34
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Sam Wormley, 13:28
Re: Is time dilation real?, RP, 13:26
Re: black holes, Sam Wormley, 13:25
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Spaceman, 13:17
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 13:16
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Orion, 13:15
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., mmeron, 13:12
black holes, lbjohnson1949, 13:08
Re: God is pure, donstockbauer, 13:08
Re: curses, donstockbauer, 13:06
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:05
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Mark Martin, 12:50
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, mmeron, 12:41
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 12:36
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Sam Wormley, 12:33
Re: Cross-Field antenna, Rich Grise, but drunk, 12:32
physicist H. S. Lipson speaks against abiogenesis, BlackSphinx, 12:30
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:28
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 12:27
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Sam Wormley, 12:27
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, tadchem, 12:25
Re: How else than by comparison, Clemens W, 12:22
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, MobyDikc, 12:20
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 12:14
Re: Three of the most powerful hurricanes of 2005 were filled with mysterious lightning, Richard Herring, 12:13
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 12:10
OT apparently - Re: German blueprints :-), Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 12:08
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Tom Roberts, 12:04
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 12:01
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Randy Poe, 11:58
curses, kstocklmeir, 11:56
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 11:53
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 11:52
Re: Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 11:51
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Orion, 11:48
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, MobyDikc, 11:48
curses, kstocklmeir, 11:41
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Mike Mainville, 11:40
curses, kstocklmeir, 11:37
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, MobyDikc, 11:34
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:33
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, John Zinni, 11:32
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 11:26
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 11:25
"Examining Mathematical Approaches", Nom, 11:23
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:21
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, Bruce Scott TOK, 11:20
Re: Is length contraction real?, Helmut Wabnig, 11:15
Nanopollution with Nano Aerogels too!, ~~NoMad~~, 11:06
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:05
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:04
Re: Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 11:01
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Ian Parker, 10:56
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Randy Poe, 10:52
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Traveler, 10:39
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Y.Porat, 10:28
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 10:01
German blueprints :-), Math Freak, 09:54
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, Mark Fergerson, 09:34
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 09:15
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 09:13
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, jmfbahciv, 09:10
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Randy Poe, 09:06
Re: I'm The Primitive Here, Almost Uniquely Many Dimensioned, And I Much Prefer It, Thomas Lee Elifritz, 09:01
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., dmtbgv, 08:43
Re: A few basic physics Qs, RP, 08:43
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Richard Henry, 08:38
Re: A few basic physics Qs, Hexenmeister, 08:10
Re: Is time dilation real?, Hexenmeister, 08:01
Re: Is time dilation real?, Hexenmeister, 07:52
Re: How else than by comparison, Don1, 07:51
Re: How else than by comparison, Don1, 07:46
Re: Torsion Fields - True or False, chantal, 07:45
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 07:35
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:30
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Double-A, 07:00
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 06:27
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Lloyd Parker, 06:01
Re: Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, nightbat, 05:21
Matter - antimatter assymmetry is related to baryon conservation, Greysky, 04:52
Re: Naked Electron, Y.Porat, 04:29
Re: Cross-Field antenna, Anthony Fremont, 04:13
Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2, Eric Gisse, 04:01
Re: Cross-Field antenna, Helmut Wabnig, 03:55
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, G. L. Bradford, 03:51
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, mmeron, 02:22
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Henri Wilson, 02:19
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, mmeron, 02:19
Re: an electron question, FrediFizzx, 02:17
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, Timo Nieminen, 01:51
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Richard Henry, 01:32
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 01:22
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 01:21
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, RP, 01:19
Re: Unification of Directions in Big Bang, OsherD, 01:16
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, mmeron, 01:16
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 01:07
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, RP, 01:07
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, Timo Nieminen, 01:02
Re: Is time dilation real?, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
Unification of Directions in Big Bang, OsherD, 01:00
Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2, Hexenmeister, 00:46
Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2, Hexenmeister, 00:42
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 00:35
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, mmeron, 00:23
Re: I'm The Primitive Here, Almost Uniquely Many Dimensioned, And I Much Prefer It, Hexenmeister, 00:18
Re: Is time dilation real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 00:07
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Hexenmeister, 00:03

January 15, 2006

Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:43
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, Creighton Hogg, 23:30
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 23:28
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, John C . Polasek, 23:18
Re: Naked Electron, Autymn D. C., 23:13
Re: I'm The Primitive Here, Almost Uniquely Many Dimensioned, And I Much Prefer It, Jim McCauley, 23:03
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, RP, 23:00
Re: Is time dilation real?, Eric Gisse, 22:59
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 22:59
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Autymn D. C., 22:47
Re: Torsion Fields - True or False, chantal, 22:46
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, mmeron, 22:46
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Autymn D. C., 22:35
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:30
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, donstockbauer, 22:29
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, Autymn D. C., 22:27
Re: Is time dilation real?, RP, 22:16
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Traveler, 22:16
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 22:11
Re: Is time dilation real?, donstockbauer, 22:06
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:02
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, gms, 22:01
Re: Cross-Field antenna, donstockbauer, 21:57
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Richard Henry, 21:56
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:53
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, Dave K, 21:19
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, tadchem, 21:19
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., tadchem, 21:14
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, tadchem, 20:53
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 20:44
Re: Cross-Field antenna, Sjouke Burry, 20:25
An Invention as the Theory or the Material Stress Fallacy, Douglas Eagleson, 20:18
A Pauli Matrix "Representation" of 1 + y - x - k, OsherD, 20:10
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 20:03
Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2, donstockbauer, 20:01
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, Dave K, 19:57
Cross-Field antenna, Naebad, 19:56
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 19:53
Re: God is pure, donstockbauer, 19:45
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 19:30
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 19:22
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Sam Wormley, 19:20
Re: some flaws in the questions and answers section of the first chapter, Androcles, 19:14
Re: Why doesn't the sky go green before it goes red ni the evening?, Richard Henry, 18:55
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Richard Henry, 18:52
Re: Why doesn't the sky go green before it goes red ni the evening?, Hexenmeister, 18:50
Re: Gravitation at the center of the Earth., Mark Martin, 18:50
Gravitation at the center of the Earth., dmtbgv, 18:37
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, Mike Mainville, 18:35
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Hexenmeister, 18:35
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, Timo Nieminen, 18:31
Re: Torsion Fields - True or False, Hero . van . Jindelt, 18:24
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, Dave K, 18:24
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Hexenmeister, 18:20
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., T Wake, 18:15
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:08
Re: Breakers, Math Freak, 17:55
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:48
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, Bruce Scott TOK, 17:39
A Recent Complex Creation at www.pearlmancta.com, info, 17:33
Re: Torsion Fields - True or False, Ken S. Tucker, 17:28
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, Jan Panteltje, 17:25
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Paul B. Andersen, 17:22
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 17:16
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Henri Wilson, 17:10
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, Timo Nieminen, 16:59
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 16:55
Re: an electron question, srp, 16:52
Re: I'm The Primitive Here, Almost Uniquely Many Dimensioned, And I Much Prefer It, Happy Hippy, 16:47
Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2, Mike Jr., 16:28
Re: I'm The Primitive Here, Almost Uniquely Many Dimensioned, And I Much Prefer It, jonathan, 16:01
Re: How else than by comparison, Bob Cain, 15:56
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, The old Sorcerer, 15:55
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Richard Henry, 15:52
Re: Breakers, Bob Cain, 15:52
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, The old Sorcerer, 15:49
Re: Sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2) and the Ratio-Derivative-Phase (RDP) Paradox, OsherD, 15:43
Re: an electron question, FrediFizzx, 15:38
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., Bob Cain, 15:30
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 15:27
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 15:22
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 15:12
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, Mark Fergerson, 15:12
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., PD, 15:00
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, The old Sorcerer, 14:56
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, mmeron, 14:48
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, mmeron, 14:46
Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 14:04
Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", donstockbauer, 14:02
Re: How else than by comparison, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 13:55
Re: How else than by comparison, odin, 13:52
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Tom Roberts, 13:32
Re: How else than by comparison, Sam Wormley, 12:50
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Sam Wormley, 12:46
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Tom Roberts, 12:44
How else than by comparison, Don1, 12:43
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Tom Roberts, 12:37
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 12:26
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Douglas Eagleson, 12:25
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Roger Beresford, 12:18
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Roger Beresford, 12:18
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Richard Henry, 12:10
Re: Sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2) and the Ratio-Derivative-Phase (RDP) Paradox, OsherD, 11:44
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Traveler, 11:40
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, The old Sorcerer, 11:38
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, kenneth . bull, 11:36
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, RP, 11:34
Re: an electron question, srp, 11:33
Sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2) and the Ratio-Derivative-Phase (RDP) Paradox, OsherD, 11:29
"The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Woleb, 11:19
Re: a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Douglas Eagleson, 11:17
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 11:11
a mathematical question .. unanswered !!!, Udayan, 11:07
A Symmetry Effect Theory Implication, Douglas Eagleson, 11:02
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 11:01
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:52
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 10:51
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, Mark Fergerson, 10:46
God is pure, kstocklmeir, 10:12
Re: begining question on Quantum field theory, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:10
God, kstocklmeir, 10:09
Re: Breakers, Mark Fergerson, 09:53
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 09:36
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 09:34
I'm The Primitive Here, Almost Uniquely Many Dimensioned, And I Much Prefer It, G. L. Bradford, 09:11
Re: SU(2) EM Gauge Symmetry possible?, chantal, 09:10
Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2, Randy Poe, 08:38
Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2, Mike Jr., 07:49
Re: Relativity of Time, surrealistic-dream, 07:38
SU(2) EM Gauge Symmetry possible?, chantal, 06:40
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., The Ghost In The Machine, 06:00
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 05:42
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., T Wake, 05:40
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, Jim Black, 05:27
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 05:24
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, donstockbauer, 05:15
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 04:50
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 04:42
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, G. L. Bradford, 04:33
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Schoenfeld, 04:11
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 03:48
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 03:46
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 03:45
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, mmeron, 03:45
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 03:43
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 03:41
Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2, The old Sorcerer, 03:30
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 03:22
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Richard Henry, 03:16
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 03:09
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, The old Sorcerer, 03:04
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 02:53
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 02:53
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., The old Sorcerer, 02:50
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 02:48
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 02:45
Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 02:42
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Henri Wilson, 02:40
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 02:21
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 02:19
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 02:18
Saddle-Shaped Surfaces and Probable Influence (PI) with Gradients 3: Bose-Einstein Condensates, OsherD, 01:58
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 01:46
Re: Relativity of Time, Bilge, 01:39
Re: Relativity of Time, Bilge, 01:38
Re: Help needed!!!, Michael Varney, 01:29
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 01:19
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 01:09
Breakers, Math Freak, 00:57
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 00:45
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, Eric Gisse, 00:30
Re: begining question on Quantum field theory, Eugene Stefanovich, 00:26
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 00:21
Re: Is time dilation real?, Sam Wormley, 00:18
Re: Lorentz Contraction and Time Dilation, Sam Wormley, 00:15
Re: some flaws in the questions and answers section of the first chapter, Mike Mainville, 00:03
Re: entropy decrease, Sam Wormley, 00:02
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00

January 14, 2006

Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, Richard Henry, 23:42
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:24
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 23:18
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:17
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Randy Poe, 23:16
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:08
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., Bob Cain, 23:03
Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", donstockbauer, 23:03
begining question on Quantum field theory, drk, 22:58
Re: Why the negative in hooke's law?, kenneth . bull, 22:56
Why the negative in hooke's law?, kenneth . bull, 22:54
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 22:48
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 22:40
Re: Lorentz Contraction and Time Dilation, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 22:38
Re: Is time dilation real?, Eric Gisse, 22:27
Re: Is time dilation real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 22:23
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Schoenfeld, 22:12
Re: an electron question, FrediFizzx, 22:03
Re: Saddle-Shaped Surfaces and Probable Influence (PI) with Gradients 2: Magnetism Causes Rotation/Expansion, donstockbauer, 22:03
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:35
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 21:35
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:30
Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 21:26
Re: Is time dilation real?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:10
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 20:54
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 20:48
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 20:48
Re: Donations Solicited, Maulana Gott, 20:39
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., Bob Cain, 20:37
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, The old Sorcerer, 20:34
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, hanson, 20:32
Relativistic Wunderkinder... ahahaha...., hanson, 20:31
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, hanson, 20:31
Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 20:28
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Brit, 20:22
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 20:16
Re: Saddle-Shaped Surfaces and Probable Influence (PI) with Gradients, OsherD, 20:06
Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 19:56
Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 19:55
Re: Saddle-Shaped Surfaces and Probable Influence (PI) with Gradients, OsherD, 19:53
Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2, Brit, 19:52
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 19:50
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 19:50
Re: entropy decrease, Brit, 19:48
Donations Solicited, Douglas Eagleson, 19:41
Re: Saddle-Shaped Surfaces and Probable Influence (PI) with Gradients, OsherD, 19:39
Re: an electron question, srp, 19:38
Saddle-Shaped Surfaces and Probable Influence (PI) with Gradients, OsherD, 19:26
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 19:18
Re: A few basic physics Qs, Math Freak, 19:13
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., The old Sorcerer, 19:11
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, The old Sorcerer, 19:06
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 18:40
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 18:40
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 18:40
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Happy Hippy, 18:38
Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2, Douglas Eagleson, 18:36
Re: God doedn't play dice, Bob Cain, 17:41
Re: Easy MONEY with PAYPAL in 2 weeks, Matthew Lybanon, 17:33
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., double precision, 17:22
Re: Question on the big bang, Naebad, 17:20
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 17:14
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Henri Wilson, 17:13
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, John Kennaugh, 16:59
Re: Torsion Fields - True or False, chantal, 16:55
Re: an electron question, FrediFizzx, 16:12
Evidence That a Frozen Fish Didn't Impact the Pentagon on 9/11, dove, 15:52
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, Dave K, 15:05
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, sdr, 14:57
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, Jim Black, 14:44
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Sue..., 14:43
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Traveler, 14:33
Re: Galileo's constant, odin, 14:21
Re: Galileo's constant, odin, 14:10
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, mmeron, 13:52
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, Jan Panteltje, 13:41
Re: Relativity of Time, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:38
Re: Galileo's constant, Don1, 13:32
entropy decrease, niraj, 13:29
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, sdrodrian, 13:20
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, Mark Fergerson, 13:15
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, The old Sorcerer, 13:14
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, The old Sorcerer, 13:12
Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Aetherist, 13:05
NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2, Mike Jr., 13:02
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:55
Re: some flaws in the questions and answers section of the first chapter, The old Sorcerer, 12:49
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 12:46
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 12:36
Re: God doedn't play dice, Traveler, 12:27
Re: God must not play dice with the universe !, The old Sorcerer, 12:26
Re: Relativity of Time, The old Sorcerer, 12:09
Re: A few basic physics Qs, Sam Wormley, 12:01
Re: A few basic physics Qs, Sam Wormley, 11:42
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 11:42
Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 11:37
Re: A few basic physics Qs, RP, 11:34
Re: Relativity of Time, Janika, 11:34
Re: "The Einstein Hoax", clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 11:32
A few basic physics Qs, Stephen, 11:17
"The Einstein Hoax", Woleb, 10:53
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Joe Fischer, 10:50
Re: Naked Electron, John C . Polasek, 10:45
Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 10:43
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 10:42
Re: God doedn't play dice, Mike Mainville, 10:41
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, kenseto, 10:40
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 10:40
Re: God doedn't play dice, Traveler, 09:43
Re: Rotational poles vs magnetic poles, srp, 09:27
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Ken S. Tucker, 09:12
Re: Question on the big bang, Greg Neill, 09:05
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 08:51
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Dirk Van de moortel, 08:48
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Ken S. Tucker, 08:28
Re: Torsion Fields - True or False, Ken S. Tucker, 08:17
Re: Torsion Fields - True or False, chantal, 08:15
Raw Data (long), ~~NoMad~~, 08:12
Re: Torsion Fields - True or False, chantal, 08:07
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Sue..., 07:59
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., Orion, 07:56
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Ken S. Tucker, 07:41
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Sue..., 07:34
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Ken S. Tucker, 07:19
Torsion Fields - True or False, chantal, 07:13
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., T Wake, 07:12
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Sue..., 07:09
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Ken S. Tucker, 07:02
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Sue..., 06:58
Re: Question on the big bang, The old Sorcerer, 06:54
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Ken S. Tucker, 06:53
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Sue..., 06:48
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, The old Sorcerer, 06:46
Re: Naked Electron, Orion, 06:41
Re: Naked Electron, Ken S. Tucker, 06:41
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Sue..., 06:32
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Joe Fischer, 06:27
Re: Naked Electron, chantal, 06:11
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Ken S. Tucker, 05:51
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Sue..., 05:37
Re: Naked Electron, Ken S. Tucker, 05:30
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 04:37
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 04:32
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Joe Fischer, 04:17
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Ken S. Tucker, 04:10
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 04:06
Re: Naked Electron, chantal, 03:50
Re: THE U.S. INTELLIGENTLY DESIGNED IGNORANT STUDENTS, Proginoskes, 03:45
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, Dr Nanduri, 03:31
Re: Is time dilation real?, Jim Black, 03:19
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., Dr Nanduri, 03:07
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, mmeron, 02:58
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 15: Composition vs Products, OsherD, 02:43
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 15: Composition vs Products, OsherD, 02:34
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 15: Composition vs Products, OsherD, 02:26
Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 15: Composition vs Products, OsherD, 02:09
The largest known prime number now runs to 9,152,052 decimal digits, Sam Wormley, 01:49
Re: Lorentz Contraction and Time Dilation, Y.Porat, 01:34
Re: Question on the big bang, Naebad, 01:29
Lorentz Contraction and Time Dilation, Sam Wormley, 01:03
recently discovered objects at the far reaches of the solar system, Sam Wormley, 00:45
Re: Is time dilation real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 00:06

January 13, 2006

Re: Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 23:53
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Mark Martin, 23:52
Re: Is time dilation real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 23:49
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 23:45
Re: Question on the big bang, Sam Wormley, 23:45
Rotational poles vs magnetic poles, Uno Lapideus, 23:39
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 13 January 2006 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 23:33
Re: God doedn't play dice, platopes, 23:10
Re: Question on the big bang, Greg Neill, 22:44
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Greg Neill, 22:36
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Greg Neill, 22:33
Re: Is time dilation real?, Eric Gisse, 22:16
Re: God doedn't play dice, donstockbauer, 21:54
Re: God doedn't play dice, Traveler, 21:45
Question on the big bang, Naebad, 21:30
Re: God doedn't play dice, donstockbauer, 21:20
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 21:17
Re: Is length contraction real?, Schoenfeld, 21:09
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, Autymn D. C., 21:02
Re: Stephan's Law disproves theory of greenhouse gases, kdthrge, 21:01
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, Autymn D. C., 20:55
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., T Wake, 20:48
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 20:38
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:38
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:35
Re: Would Special Relativity need modifying, if nothing can be at absolute rest?, Autymn D. C., 20:34
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Autymn D. C., 20:25
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Autymn D. C., 20:21
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 20:15
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 20:07
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, sdr, 19:33
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Schoenfeld, 19:15
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., Schoenfeld, 19:05
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:46
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., DaveK, 18:45
Re: Help needed!!!, Boris Mohar, 18:42
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., CWatters, 18:35
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 13 Jan 06 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 18:34
Re: 50% OF POPULATION BELOW AVG IQ!, Charles, 18:33
Quantization of Space, Time and Mass. The Unitons., Louis_N, 18:32
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., DaveK, 18:30
Re: Is time dilation real?, OG, 18:29
Re: Help needed!!!, Maulana Gott, 18:13
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:08
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:03
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, mmeron, 17:59
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, mmeron, 17:55
Re: Naked Electron, FrediFizzx, 17:09
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 17:06
Re: can light be bent by electromagnetic fields?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 17:03
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., Orion, 17:02
Re: Naked Electron, Ken S. Tucker, 17:02
Re: Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 17:00
Re: Naked Electron, Ken S. Tucker, 16:57
Re: Naked Electron, Ken S. Tucker, 16:55
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, dej4, 16:49
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., T Wake, 16:47
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, dej4, 16:45
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 16:45
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, dej4, 16:43
Slowing Light with Biology, Sam Wormley, 16:37
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, big magician, 16:36
Re: Naked Electron, PD, 16:34
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 16:33
Re: Naked Electron, Orion, 16:29
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 16:23
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 16:19
Re: What's this universe that is expanding..., Sam Wormley, 16:19
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, The old Sorcerer, 16:19
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., Orion, 16:10
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, dej4, 16:01
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Bilge, 16:00
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Eric Gisse, 15:57
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., Puppet_Sock, 15:56
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 15:54
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, The old Sorcerer, 15:45
Re: The physics of a vagina ..., donstockbauer, 15:41
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Henri Wilson, 15:39
Re: How do atoms generate light waves?, Orion, 15:32
What's this universe that is expanding..., Dave K, 15:30
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Sue..., 15:18
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Richard Henry, 15:10
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Sue..., 15:03
Re: Naked Electron, John C . Polasek, 14:53
Re: Anti-relativist Alliance, Sue..., 14:46
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., PD, 14:34
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 14:31
Anti-relativist Alliance, MobyDikc, 14:30
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Sam Wormley, 14:22
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Spaceman, 14:02
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 14:00
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Mark Martin, 14:00
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, RP, 13:53
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, PD, 13:49
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, PD, 13:41
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 13:41
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, The old Sorcerer, 13:40
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Spaceman, 13:38
QUANTIUM BEINGS OF PURE LIGHT ( CLASSIFIED ) CODE: 455, switzerland qunatium computer, 13:38
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, PD, 13:37
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, PD, 13:35
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 13:31
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, Mark Fergerson, 13:27
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Spaceman, 13:27
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 13:25
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., JMA, 13:17
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Schoenfeld, 13:17
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Mark Martin, 13:17
Re: Why doesn't the sky go green before it goes red ni the evening?, Andy Resnick, 13:16
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Spaceman, 13:04
Re: an electron question, srp, 13:03
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Mark Martin, 13:01
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Mark Martin, 12:56
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Spaceman, 12:53
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Mark Martin, 12:51
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, PD, 12:49
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Spaceman, 12:44
Re: What good is it?, Tony Orlow, 12:39
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Mark Martin, 12:32
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, Mark Fergerson, 12:23
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Spaceman, 12:11
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Mark Martin, 12:05
Re: Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, hanson, 12:05
Re: What good is it?, gwh, 11:54
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Spaceman, 11:43
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Mark Martin, 11:41
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Mark Martin, 11:34
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Mark Martin, 11:28
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Traveler, 11:21
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 11:14
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Y.Porat, 10:49
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 10:48
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Sam Wormley, 10:43
Re: sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Spaceman, 10:36
Re: Why doesn't the sky go green before it goes red ni the evening?, Sam Wormley, 10:33
sci.physics.relativity for relativity, Puppet_Sock, 10:29
Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Puppet_Sock, 10:28
Re: some flaws in the questions and answers section of the first chapter, Sam Wormley, 10:26
Re: Is time dilation real?, Puppet_Sock, 10:25
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:18
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:18
Re: Is time dilation real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 10:10
"The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Woleb, 10:04
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Spaceman, 10:00
Re: E=mc^2, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
Re: some flaws in the questions and answers section of the first chapter, Sam Wormley, 09:45
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, sdr, 08:27
Re: God doedn't play dice, Schoenfeld, 07:49
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Sue..., 07:41
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 07:30
Re: Naked Electron, Y.Porat, 07:21
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 06:58
Re: God must not play dice with the universe !, Schoenfeld, 06:45
Luminescent pigs? Fying ones next ; -)?, Jan Panteltje, 06:41
Re: Help needed!!!, Schoenfeld, 05:51
Re: Help needed!!!, mmeron, 05:48
Why doesn't the sky go green before it goes red ni the evening?, daniel, 05:41
Re: Help needed!!!, Michael Varney, 05:31
Help needed!!!, SagarC., 05:23
Re: some flaws in the questions and answers section of the first chapter, Mathias Rocher, 05:14
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Schoenfeld, 05:11
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, donstockbauer, 04:19
Re: Is time dilation real?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 04:10
Re: God doedn't play dice, donstockbauer, 04:08
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 01:56
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 01:21
Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 01:06
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:56
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, Bill Hobba, 00:34
Re: What good is it?, Jim Black, 00:27
Re: Is time dilation real?, Jim Black, 00:07

January 12, 2006

Re: God must not play dice with the universe !, Mark Martin, 23:48
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Mark Martin, 23:36
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Mark Martin, 23:29
Re: Picture of the Universes Evolution, Henry Cazandra, 23:17
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, sdr, 22:22
Re: FPOTD # 4, The Great Flood (Hollywood or the Bible) (PIC), 1/1/2006, icycalmca, 22:19
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Schoenfeld, 22:15
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, jowr . pi, 22:11
Re: some flaws in the questions and answers section of the first chapter, Spaceman, 22:05
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Spaceman, 22:01
Re: Is length contraction real?, Schoenfeld, 21:54
Re: Is length contraction real?, Schoenfeld, 21:52
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 21:52
Re: Is length contraction real?, Sam Wormley, 21:51
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Sam Wormley, 21:50
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 21:49
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 21:49
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 21:48
Re: some flaws in the questions and answers section of the first chapter, StilenX, 21:48
Re: some flaws in the questions and answers section of the first chapter, Sam Wormley, 21:47
some flaws in the questions and answers section of the first chapter, StilenX, 21:43
Re: Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 21:42
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Spaceman, 21:38
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Spaceman, 21:36
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Sam Wormley, 21:36
Re: Smart Model Predictions Shown in Real Atomic Images, Sam Wormley, 21:33
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, brad, 21:25
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, Bill Hobba, 21:24
Re: The 30 second fuse... A problem for GR?, Mark Martin, 21:21
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Maulana Gott, 21:13
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 21:10
Re: Is time dilation real?, Eric Gisse, 21:05
Re: What good is it?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:56
Plants a major source of atmospheric methane, Llanzlan Klazmon, 20:53
Picture of the Universes Evolution, Louise Johnson, 20:46
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 20:40
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:36
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:32
Re: What good is it?, Mark-T, 20:32
Re: God is fair, T Wake, 20:28
Smart Model Predictions Shown in Real Atomic Images, S. Enterprize Company, 20:27
Re: How do atoms generate light waves?, Mark Martin, 20:24
Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., slavek krepelka, 20:21
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:21
Re: God is fair, The old Sorcerer, 20:18
Re: More religious stupidity, The old Sorcerer, 20:16
Re: God doedn't play dice, OG, 20:13
Re: Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 20:05
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Mark Martin, 20:05
Re: Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, Greg Neill, 20:04
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, sdrodrian, 20:03
Re: Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 20:03
Re: Is time dilation real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 19:58
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 19:54
Re: Naked Electron, FrediFizzx, 19:54
Why cant two things occupy the same space at the same time?, brad, 19:52
Re: curses, donstockbauer, 19:52
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, Bill Hobba, 19:44
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, donstockbauer, 19:41
Re: Is time dilation real?, OG, 19:41
Re: Is time dilation real?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 19:40
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, mmeron, 19:39
Re: God is pure, donstockbauer, 19:32
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 19:31
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 19:26
God is pure, kkurtstocklmeir, 19:24
Re: Is time dilation real?, Spaceman, 19:20
Re: Is length contraction real?, mmeron, 19:18
curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 19:18
Re: Galileo's discovery, jowr . pi, 19:18
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., T Wake, 19:14
Re: It's the end of Usenet as we know it!, hanson, 19:14
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, The old Sorcerer, 19:12
Is time dilation real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 19:06
Is time dilation real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 19:06
Re: Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 19:01
Re: Naked Electron, hanson, 19:01
Re: Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 18:57
Re: Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 18:55
Re: Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 18:53
Re: Galileo's constant, odin, 18:41
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 18:37
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, odin, 18:36
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, sdr, 18:32
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:31
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, Spaceman, 18:30
Re: Galileo's constant, Don1, 18:28
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, Bill Hobba, 18:26
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:22
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, odin, 18:16
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 18:13
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, Spaceman, 18:09
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 18:08
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:08
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., Dirk Van de moortel, 18:08
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, odin, 18:07
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:07
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, Laurent, 18:04
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, Laurent, 18:04
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., CWatters, 18:04
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., T Wake, 18:03
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, Spaceman, 18:00
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 17:54
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:45
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, odin, 17:44
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, Spaceman, 17:41
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, odin, 17:40
Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong., Sam Wormley, 17:40
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, Spaceman, 17:40
Re: Galileo's discovery, T Wake, 17:35
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, odin, 17:35
Re: Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, Bill Hobba, 17:32
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, odin, 17:29
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 17:28
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, Spaceman, 17:27
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, Spaceman, 17:25
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, odin, 17:23
Re: Galileo's discovery, Don1, 17:21
Re: Galileo's discovery, odin, 17:16
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, jowr . pi, 17:13
Re: What good is it?, Mark Martin, 17:12
Naked Electron, chantal, 17:07
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, Spaceman, 16:57
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 16:56
Re: Galileo's discovery - correction, odin, 16:54
Re: Galileo's discovery, Maulana Gott, 16:54
Re: Galileo's discovery, odin, 16:45
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 16:44
Re: Galileo's discovery, Eric Gisse, 16:25
Re: Galileo's discovery, Maulana Gott, 16:24
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 16:23
Re: God doedn't play dice, tadchem, 16:14
Re: God doedn't play dice, donstockbauer, 16:04
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 761 January 11, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, donstockbauer, 15:59
Re: Is length contraction real?, The old Sorcerer, 15:58
Re: Galileo's discovery, odin, 15:57
Re: Quantum Entanglement question, donstockbauer, 15:53
Re: What good is it?, odin, 15:51
Re: It's the end of Usenet as we know it!, Der alte Hexenmeister, 15:40
Re: Galileo's discovery, T Wake, 15:30
Re: There is a God, Der alte Hexenmeister, 15:30
Re: Galileo's discovery, Maulana Gott, 15:28
Re: What good is it?, T Wake, 15:27
Re: What good is it?, Maulana Gott, 15:23
Re: What good is it?, odin, 15:15
What good is it?, Don1, 15:12
Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, Jim Black, 15:02
Re: God is fair, Tony, 14:57
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 14:55
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 14:46
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, PD, 14:41
Re: Galileo's discovery, PD, 14:28
Re: God is fair, donstockbauer, 14:24
Re: Galileo's discovery, odin, 14:23
Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Cosmological Constant (i.e. "Dark Energy") is BOGUS, sdr, 14:19
Re: Galileo's discovery, Maulana Gott, 14:18
Re: Galileo's discovery, odin, 14:13
Re: God doedn't play dice, T Wake, 14:12
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, PD, 14:02
Re: C * G * Z = 1, hanson, 13:27
Re: Galileo's discovery, odin, 13:14
Re: Galileo's discovery, Don1, 13:07
Re: How do atoms generate light waves?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 12:59
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 12:46
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:39
Re: God is pure, Richard Tobin, 12:38
Re: There is a God, Rudi Menter, 12:19
Re: God doedn't play dice, srp, 12:19
Re: God doedn't play dice, Der alte Hexenmeister, 12:09
Re: It's the end of Usenet as we know it!, Der alte Hexenmeister, 12:05
Re: There is a God, Der alte Hexenmeister, 12:02
Re: It's the end of Usenet as we know it!, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:01
Re: Galileo's discovery, odin, 11:57
Re: It's the end of Usenet as we know it!, hanson, 11:52
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 11:34
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 11:32
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 11:28
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 11:23
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 11:21
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Spaceman, 11:18
Re: Galileo's discovery, Sam Wormley, 11:15
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, PD, 11:14
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Spaceman, 11:08
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, PD, 11:02
Re: God doedn't play dice, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:00
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, Spaceman, 10:54
Re: Galileo's discovery, Maulana Polycep, 10:52
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, PD, 10:51
Re: Galileo's discovery, luiroto, 10:31
God is pure, kkurtstocklmeir, 10:27
Re: A new discrete view to quantum mechanics, Puppet_Sock, 10:21
God is pure, kkurtstocklmeir, 10:19
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Spaceman, 10:15
God is mad, kkurtstocklmeir, 10:11
God is fair, kkurtstocklmeir, 10:10
Galileo's discovery, Don1, 10:10
curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 10:10
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Tom Roberts, 10:09
A new discrete view to quantum mechanics, Wolfgang Köhler, 10:07
Re: Static Charge question and some fun if you dare., Spaceman, 10:06
Re: Rasmus Rasismus, dedanoe, 10:05
Re: It's the end of Usenet as we know it!, Areader, 09:54
Re: God doedn't play dice, T Wake, 09:42
"The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Woleb, 09:40
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 09:40
God doedn't play dice, Naebad, 09:28
Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 09:18
Re: It's the end of Usenet as we know it!, Andy Resnick, 09:17
Re: Beams and time dependence, Timo Nieminen, 08:59
May the Dark Force be With Ya!, perryneheum, 08:41
Re: Static Charge question and some fun if you dare., RP, 08:36
Re: Live cells jetted with electric fields, Jan Panteltje, 07:45
Re: Static Charge question and some fun if you dare., Jan Panteltje, 07:38
Re: The proof of mass vector., Pmb, 07:12
Latest caption picture, Null, 07:07
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, Der alte Hexenmeister, 07:06
Beams and time dependence, Zinc Potterman, 06:31
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, Jim Black, 05:42
Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, Jim Black, 05:32
Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, Jim Black, 05:18
Re: Static Charge question and some fun if you dare., CWatters, 04:22
Re: Galileo's constant, odin, 03:50
forces in a Big Bang theory versus forces in an Atom Totality theory, a_plutonium, 03:41
Re: an electron question, FrediFizzx, 03:24
Re: Bayesian (Conditional Probability-Statistics) Estimation is Preferable To Ordinary Estimation By PI, OsherD, 03:12
Re: Bayesian (Conditional Probability-Statistics) Estimation is Preferable To Ordinary Estimation By PI, OsherD, 02:47
Bayesian (Conditional Probability-Statistics) Estimation is Preferable To Ordinary Estimation By PI, OsherD, 02:23
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 14: Leibniz and Generalized Leibniz Rules, OsherD, 01:55
Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 14: Leibniz and Generalized Leibniz Rules, OsherD, 01:41
Re: It's the end of Usenet as we know it!, Al Zenner, 01:38
How do atoms generate light waves?, franklinhu, 01:25
CFP: The International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2006, imecs_2006, 00:46
Re: It's the end of Usenet as we know it!, Eric Gisse, 00:39
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 00:32
Re: There is a God, xlrv, 00:20

January 11, 2006

Re: It's the end of Usenet as we know it!, RP, 23:47
Re: Static Charge question and some fun if you dare., RP, 23:34
Re: It's the end of Usenet as we know it!, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:29
Re: There is a God, Ken S. Tucker, 23:27
It's the end of Usenet as we know it!, WattMan, 23:15
Re: There is a God, markwh04, 23:14
Re: Gravity 1A - Back to the Drawing Board, Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy), 23:13
Re: Static Charge question and some fun if you dare., dbohara, 23:11
Re: Static Charge question and some fun if you dare., RP, 23:02
Re: an electron question, srp, 22:44
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 22:32
Live cells jetted with electric fields, Sam Wormley, 22:19
Re: How long was the first second?, Der alte Hexenmeister, 22:18
Re: Galileo's constant, odin, 22:15
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 22:08
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bilge, 22:07
Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:44
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, Der alte Hexenmeister, 21:23
Re: Particle Accelerator problem., Gregory L. Hansen, 21:13
Re: Work, gravity, potential energy, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:11
Re: How Einstein Destroyed Science, operator jay, 20:56
Re: Galileo's constant, odin, 20:47
Re: Galileo's constant, Don1, 20:41
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, tressure, 19:58
Re: Static Charge question and some fun if you dare., Sam Wormley, 19:55
Static Charge question and some fun if you dare., Spaceman, 19:42
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 761 January 11, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Spaceman, 19:21
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 19:00
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, CWatters, 18:55
Re: Galileo's constant, odin, 18:53
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 18:50
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Spaceman, 18:46
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Spaceman, 18:44
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:43
Re: Is length contraction real?, Timo Nieminen, 18:39
Temperature and Energy (Mechanical Universe), W. Watson, 18:32
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:31
Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", donstockbauer, 18:29
Re: Is length contraction real?, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:23
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:19
Re: God is pure, Richard Tobin, 18:17
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:12
Re: Is length contraction real?, Rudi Menter, 18:07
Re: Is length contraction real?, Schoenfeld, 18:04
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 18:02
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 18:01
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:56
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 17:53
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:37
Re: Is length contraction real?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:26
Re: Article: Gamma-ray burst study may rule out cosmological constant, Len Gaasenbeek, 17:25
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 761 January 11, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, mmeron, 17:24
Re: Relativity of Time, Bilge, 17:21
Re: Is length contraction real?, Rudi Menter, 17:17
Re: Particle Accelerator problem., mmeron, 17:16
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:04
Re: an electron question, FrediFizzx, 17:02
Re: Is length contraction real?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:01
Supersolid versus superfluid, michalchik, 16:57
Re: How long was the first second?, Bob Cain, 16:56
Re: Is length contraction real?, Rudi Menter, 16:49
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 761 January 11, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 16:49
Re: 6-Vector Light-Conoid Metric?, Roger Beresford, 16:49
Re: wise, Hero . van . Jindelt, 16:44
Re: Is length contraction real?, Rudi Menter, 16:44
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, John Kennaugh, 16:40
Re: E=mc^2, Eric Gisse, 16:33
Re: Is length contraction real?, Hero . van . Jindelt, 16:30
Re: an electron question, srp, 16:29
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 16:27
Re: detecting single nanoparticles in real time, Physar Polycep, 16:17
Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Richard Miller, 16:10
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Henri Wilson, 16:08
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 16:07
Re: More religious stupidity, Michael Varney, 15:53
Article: Gamma-ray burst study may rule out cosmological constant, Robert Karl Stonjek, 15:37
Galileo's constant, Don1, 15:26
Re: God is pure, donstockbauer, 15:26
Re: Supply PTC Thermistors,NTC Thermistors From China, Physar Polycep, 15:22
Re: Gravity 1A - Back to the Drawing Board, G. L. Bradford, 15:12
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Timo Nieminen, 14:52
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 761 January 11, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 14:52
Re: Is length contraction real?, Sam Wormley, 14:49
Re: Particle Accelerator problem., Puppet_Sock, 14:47
Re: Is length contraction real?, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:44
Re: More religious stupidity, Mark Fergerson, 14:43
Re: Light, vision, human consciousness and evolution, Mark Fergerson, 14:39
Re: Is length contraction real?, Sam Wormley, 14:35
Is length contraction real?, clujdej@xxxxxxxxx, 14:16
Re: E=mc^2, Jim Black, 13:58
Re: More religious stupidity, Al Zenner, 13:53
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Creighton Hogg, 13:51
Re: History of Internet Posting by Fusar Gramin (F.G.) alias Physar Polycep etc., OsherD, 13:22
Re: E=mc^2, CWatters, 13:16
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:00
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 12:56
Re: an electron question, srp, 12:37
wise, kkurtstocklmeir, 12:32
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:26
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 12:24
More religious stupidity, Michael Varney, 12:23
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:20
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Dave K, 12:18
curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 12:12
curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 12:05
curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 12:04
God is pure, kkurtstocklmeir, 12:01
God is pure, kkurtstocklmeir, 11:57
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Tom Roberts, 11:57
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 11:55
God is pure, kkurtstocklmeir, 11:53
God is pure, kkurtstocklmeir, 11:52
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 11:48
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:43
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 11:41
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 11:39
Re: Particle Accelerator problem., mmeron, 11:36
EC-funded Research Visits: Application Deadline 28/02/2006, europa, 11:34
Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005, Richard Herring, 11:33
QUANTUM MECHANICS DEFINED, ACE, 11:31
QUANTUM MECHANICS DEFINED, ACE, 11:31
QUANTUM MECHANICS DEFINED, ACE, 11:31
QUANTUM MECHANICS DEFINED, ACE, 11:31
Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 11:31
Re: E=mc^2, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:29
Re: E=mc^2, Spaceman, 11:26
Re: E=mc^2, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:24
Re: E=mc^2, Rudi Menter, 11:21
Re: E=mc^2, Spaceman, 11:19
Re: E=mc^2, Spaceman, 11:16
Re: E=mc^2, Sam Wormley, 11:16
Re: E=mc^2, Spaceman, 11:14
Re: E=mc^2, Rudi Menter, 11:01
Re: E=mc^2, Spaceman, 10:59
Re: E=mc^2, Mathias Rocher, 10:53
Re: E=mc^2, Spaceman, 10:53
Re: E=mc^2, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:52
Re: Particle Accelerator problem., jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:48
Re: E=mc^2, Rudi Menter, 10:46
Re: E=mc^2, Spaceman, 10:46
Re: E=mc^2, Spaceman, 10:41
Re: E=mc^2, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:35
Re: E=mc^2, Rudi Menter, 10:31
E=mc^2, Spaceman, 10:26
Re: Particle Accelerator problem., Richard Henry, 10:20
Re: Is there an Internet Browser that..., Dirk Van de moortel, 10:15
Particle Accelerator problem., rob . maye, 10:08
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Dave K, 09:51
Re: Is there an Internet Browser that..., Spaceman, 09:49
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Spaceman, 09:45
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 09:42
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Sam Wormley, 09:42
Re: Tornado's kinetic energy, am I right?, Andy Resnick, 09:34
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Spaceman, 09:34
Re: How long was the first second?, Dave K, 09:29
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 09:28
Re: Work, gravity, potential energy, CWatters, 09:27
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Dave K, 09:27
"How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Woleb, 09:24
Re: How big is the Universe?, Richard Tobin, 09:23
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Spaceman, 09:22
Re: detecting single nanoparticles in real time, Andy Resnick, 09:18
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, CWatters, 09:15
Re: global warming increases intensity of hurricanes, but does it decrease tornadoes?, James Annan, 09:04
Re: Quantum Entanglement question, Dave K, 08:51
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Lloyd Parker, 08:50
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Dave K, 08:48
Re: OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, PD, 08:44
Re: What would antigravity mean for GR?, Traveler, 08:40
Re: global warming increases intensity of hurricanes, but does it decrease tornadoes?, Scott, 08:36
Re: Is there a Internet browser that..., Jan Panteltje, 08:18
Re: What would antigravity mean for GR?, Traveler, 08:09
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, donstockbauer, 08:06
Re: Tornado's kinetic energy, am I right?, stasgold, 07:54
Re: Tornado's kinetic energy, am I right?, stasgold, 07:42
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Dr. Dickie, 07:11
Re: Black Holes: The Female Aspect Of The Universe & Dark Matter, Wizard of Odd, 06:01
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:33
Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, newedana, 05:05
Re: Is there a Internet browser that..., tdp1001, 04:44
Re: Quantum Entanglement question, Dr Photon, 04:40
Re: Supply PTC Thermistors,NTC Thermistors From China, Helmut Wabnig, 03:18
Re: Quantum Entanglement question, G. L. Bradford, 02:44
Re: Tornado's kinetic energy, am I right?, David Wilkinson, 02:30
Re: an electron question, FrediFizzx, 02:22
Re: How big is the Universe?, Der alte Hexenmeister, 02:16
Re: How long was the first second?, Der alte Hexenmeister, 02:13
Re: Potter's favorite computer programs., Alpha, 02:04
Re: Is there an Internet Browser that..., Der alte Hexenmeister, 01:51
OK - this is really interesting - Re: Waves using Dimension as a Medium of Propagation, LEFTY, 01:45
"Shape has no meaning at the quantum level.", Happy Hippy, 01:17
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Happy Hippy, 01:15
Re: Errors in [Aladar] Stolmar's Cosmic Background Model, G. L. Bradford, 01:13
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Happy Hippy, 01:04
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:40
Re: Collisions, Timo Nieminen, 00:27
Re: Collisions, Greg Neill, 00:25
Re: Collisions, Physar Polycep, 00:21
How to measure dark energy locally in the lab with the Casimir force, Jack Sarfatti, 00:14
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:12
Re: Work, gravity, potential energy, mmeron, 00:07

January 10, 2006

Re: History of Internet Posting by Fusar Gramin (F.G.) alias Physar Polycep etc., Physar Polycep, 23:39
global warming increases intensity of hurricanes, but does it decrease tornadoes?, a_plutonium, 23:34
Re: How long was the first second?, brad, 23:00
detecting single nanoparticles in real time, Sam Wormley, 22:28
Re: What would antigravity mean for GR?, Schoenfeld, 22:12
Work, gravity, potential energy, Eli Luong, 21:52
Supply PTC Thermistors,NTC Thermistors From China, samul888, 21:49
Collisions, Eli Luong, 21:44
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Timo Nieminen, 21:31
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:14
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:13
Re: What would antigravity mean for GR?, Gregory L. Hansen, 20:38
Re: How long was the first second?, Spaceman, 20:02
Re: How long was the first second?, Sam Wormley, 20:00
Re: How long was the first second?, Mike, 19:52
Re: Gravity slows time?, Spaceman, 19:43
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Spaceman, 19:39
Re: Is there an Internet Browser that..., tdp1001, 19:37
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Mike, 19:32
Re: So-called "Heim Theory", dbohara, 19:28
Re: How long was the first second?, Spaceman, 19:24
Re: How long was the first second?, Der alte Hexenmeister, 19:24
Re: Gravity slows time?, Spaceman, 19:15
Re: How big is the Universe?, tadchem, 19:14
Re: What would antigravity mean for GR?, markwh04, 19:12
Re: How long was the first second?, tadchem, 19:12
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 19:07
Re: Kill the læwmakeres, tadchem, 19:04
Re: Gravity slows time?, markwh04, 19:04
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Bill Hobba, 18:59
Re: So-called "Heim Theory", tadchem, 18:57
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Spaceman, 18:55
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, tadchem, 18:48
Re: Gravity slows time?, Autymn D. C., 18:46
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, tadchem, 18:44
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Spaceman, 18:44
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, tressure, 18:36
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Eric Gisse, 18:31
Re: So-called "Heim Theory", Autymn D. C., 18:16
Kill the læwmakeres, Autymn D. C., 18:10
Re: an electron question, chantal, 17:53
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Der alte Hexenmeister, 17:53
History of Internet Posting by Fusar Gramin (F.G.) alias Physar Polycep etc., OsherD, 17:46
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Der alte Hexenmeister, 17:46
Re: Tornado's kinetic energy, am I right?, stasgold, 17:37
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Spaceman, 17:25
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, CWatters, 17:19
Re: Tornado's kinetic energy, am I right?, stasgold, 17:18
Re: A Forgotten Prediction of Einstein, Spaceman, 17:18
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Spaceman, 17:15
From spr, about E-fields and EMR., Ken S. Tucker, 17:15
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Spaceman, 17:12
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Eric Gisse, 17:11
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Spaceman, 17:09
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 13: Super-Simple Equations, OsherD, 17:03
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 17:01
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Eric Gisse, 17:00
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Spaceman, 16:59
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, onehappymadman, 16:56
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:52
Re: How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Sam Wormley, 16:48
How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?, Spaceman, 16:42
Re: So-called "Heim Theory", dbohara, 16:32
Re: Bullshit in physics, srp, 16:24
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:14
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 16:07
Re: Burkhard Heim, tdperk, 15:29
Re: Bullshit in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:21
Re: Tornado's kinetic energy, am I right?, John C . Polasek, 15:09
Re: What would antigravity mean for GR?, Ken S. Tucker, 15:08
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:04
Re: Tornado's kinetic energy, am I right?, David Wilkinson, 15:00
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 14:45
Re: What would antigravity mean for GR?, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:42
Re: How big is the Universe?, Physarum Polycephalum, 14:40
Re: How long was the first second?, Physarum Polycephalum, 14:36
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Spaceman, 14:31
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Tom Roberts, 14:30
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Paul Cardinale, 14:27
Re: How long was the first second?, BD, 14:25
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 14:24
Re: Icy claim that water has memory, Dave K, 14:22
Re: How big is the Universe?, donstockbauer, 14:14
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Spaceman, 14:13
Re: What is the shape of the smallest particle?, Spaceman, 14:11
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, shahul . stilldead, 14:09
Re: What is the shape of the smallest particle?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:04
Re: How long was the first second?, Dave K, 14:03
Re: Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:01
Re: What is the shape of the smallest particle?, Dave K, 13:55
Re: How long was the first second?, Sam Wormley, 13:55
How long was the first second?, Happy Hippy, 13:49
Special Relativity and the Universe Postulate, MobyDikc, 13:48
Re: FPOTD # 4, The Great Flood (Hollywood or the Bible) (PIC), 1/1/2006, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 13:48
Re: Bullshit in physics, Sam Wormley, 13:42
Re: Gravity slows time?, Spaceman, 13:40
Re: Tornado's kinetic energy, am I right?, Andy Resnick, 13:39
Re: time question, Puppet_Sock, 13:37
Re: Gravity slows time?, Spaceman, 13:36
Re: Gravity slows time?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:34
Re: Gravity slows time?, Sam Wormley, 13:31
Re: What is the shape of the smallest particle?, Spaceman, 13:31
Re: time question, Spaceman, 13:27
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Spaceman, 13:22
Re: Gyroscope question, Sam Wormley, 13:19
Re: Gravity slows time?, Spaceman, 13:18
Re: Gyroscope question, dbohara, 13:16
Re: time question, oriel36, 13:12
Re: Gravity slows time?, Sam Wormley, 13:09
Re: Gravity slows time?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:06
Re: What is the shape of the smallest particle?, Greg Neill, 13:03
So-called "Heim Theory", dbohara, 13:00
God is pure, kkurtstocklmeir, 12:59
God is pure, kkurtstocklmeir, 12:58
Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Henri Wilson, 12:55
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Paul Cardinale, 12:52
Re: an electron question, Jim Black, 12:43
Re: Gravity slows time?, Spaceman, 12:40
Re: Quantum Entanglement question, srp, 12:37
Re: Gravity slows time?, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:32
Re: Gyroscope question, Helmut Wabnig, 12:30
Gravity slows time?, Spaceman, 12:26
Re: Tornado's kinetic energy, am I right?, stasgold, 12:26
Re: an electron question, srp, 12:17
Re: Quantum Entanglement question, Dr Photon, 12:10
Re: Gumbel's Bivariate Exponential Distribution in P(X-->Y)(x,y) 2: Differential, Physarum Polycephalum, 12:07
Re: Tornado's kinetic energy, am I right?, stasgold, 12:05
Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 5: Nonlinear Heat Conduction Equation, Physarum Polycephalum, 12:03
Gyroscope question, chad, 12:00
Re: Quantum Entanglement question, FH, 11:50
Re: What is the shape of the smallest particle?, Spaceman, 11:48
Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Dr Photon, 11:47
Re: What is the shape of the smallest particle?, Traveler, 11:46
Re: What is the shape of the smallest particle?, Traveler, 11:45
Re: an electron question, Y.Porat, 11:43
How big is the Universe?, Happy Hippy, 11:42
Re: What is the shape of the smallest particle?, Spaceman, 11:36
Re: What is the shape of the smallest particle?, Physarum Polycephalum, 11:33
Re: What is the shape of the smallest particle?, Spaceman, 11:31
Re: Is there an Internet Browser that..., Dirk Van de moortel, 11:30
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Spaceman, 11:30
What is the shape of the smallest particle?, Happy Hippy, 11:27
Re: Errors in [Aladar] Stolmar's Cosmic Background Model, Aladar, 11:26
Re: Bullshit in physics, Aladar, 11:25
Re: A reflection's motion can move FTL, Mike, 11:22
Re: What would antigravity mean for GR?, Traveler, 11:22
Re: Bullshit in physics, Aladar, 11:18
Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Mike, 11:17
Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Mike, 11:15
Re: Quantum Entanglement question, Dr Photon, 11:08
Re: Bullshit in physics, Aladar, 11:04
Re: Errors in [Aladar] Stolmar's Cosmic Background Model, Sam Wormley, 11:01
Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Dr Photon, 10:53
Re: Quantum Entanglement question, Dave K, 10:53
Re: Quantum Entanglement question, Dr Photon, 10:42
A reflection's motion can move FTL, Spaceman, 10:38
Re: Quantum Entanglement question, Dave K, 10:37
Re: Errors in [Aladar] Stolmar's Cosmic Background Model, Aladar, 10:37
Re: GPS corrections, mluttgens, 10:27
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Woleb, 10:02