sci.physics (date)
December 31, 2005
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Timo Nieminen, 16:17
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Timo Nieminen, 16:10
- Re: infrared, Sam Wormley, 16:07
- Re: infrared, Der alte Hexenmeister, 16:02
- infrared, bob, 15:49
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 15:48
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, Eric Gisse, 15:40
- Re: Raymond Ronald Karczewski, don't report Jaimie Eckles/dr.Fireman's insurance fraud -- no, don't, donstockbauer, 15:38
- Re: Deep question, Der alte Hexenmeister, 15:36
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, donstockbauer, 15:31
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, Sam Wormley, 15:30
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, Al Zenner, 15:24
- Re: Deep question, Phil Holman, 15:23
- Re: Waves, Der alte Hexenmeister, 15:22
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 15:12
- Re: Looking at the Earth's tiniest particles to explain the mysteries of the cosmos, Greysky, 15:09
- Re: Waves, Der alte Hexenmeister, 15:08
- Re: Scientists and Engineers: Make a beginner's flying saucer, better than the Avrocar or Lifter, Cor blimey mate, 15:04
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 14:57
- Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc., tj Frazir, 14:53
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, FrediFizzx, 14:38
- Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc., tj Frazir, 14:36
- Re: Mixed up between Hydraulic and Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?, Brian Whatcott, 14:35
- Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc., tj Frazir, 14:28
- Re: Natural gravitation, Don1, 14:27
- Found the answer for difference between Manometer and Hydraulic Press, guskz, 14:23
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, David Thomson, 14:16
- Re: Deep question, tj Frazir, 14:16
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Timo Nieminen, 14:15
- Re: Waves, FrediFizzx, 14:13
- Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005, tj Frazir, 14:12
- Re: Mixed up between Hydraulic and Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?, guskz, 14:08
- Re: Natural gravitation, tj Frazir, 14:07
- Re: CNN jumps the shark..., tj Frazir, 14:00
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 14:00
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Timo Nieminen, 13:58
- Re: Re-Simplified: Mixed up between Hydraulic & Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?, guskz, 13:56
- Re: Re-Simplified: Mixed up between Hydraulic & Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?, guskz, 13:52
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, Eric Gisse, 13:17
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, Y.Porat, 03:06
- Re: Credibility test, Proginoskes, 03:05
- Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy, franklinhu, 02:25
- Re: Mixed up between Hydraulic and Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?, guskz, 01:43
- Bohm's Rolling Stone on the Cosmic Landscape, Jack Sarfatti, 01:04
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, Al Zenner, 00:12
December 30, 2005
- Re: Credibility test, Sue..., 23:54
- Re: Credibility test, xxein, 23:46
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, Eric Gisse, 23:01
- Re: Natural gravitation, Eric Gisse, 22:46
- Re: Natural gravitation, John, 22:38
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 22:30
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, John, 22:29
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, John, 22:29
- Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005, John, 22:28
- Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005, John, 22:28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 22:24
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, Traveler, 22:20
- Re: 2006 -- THE YEAR OF MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : STRING THEORY IS SO 2003, Ole D. Rughede, 20:37
- Re: 2006 -- THE YEAR OF MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : STRING THEORY IS SO 2003, Ole D. Rughede, 20:29
- Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc., donstockbauer, 20:09
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, donstockbauer, 20:04
- Re: GPS and satellite clocks, hanson, 19:49
- Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc., tj Frazir, 19:43
- Re: Mixed up between Hydraulic and Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?, Der alte Hexenmeister, 19:18
- Re: Waves, Der alte Hexenmeister, 19:05
- Re: Beethoven's Ode to Joy as a sacred song, tadchem, 19:04
- Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?, tj Frazir, 19:02
- Re: Waves, Der alte Hexenmeister, 19:02
- Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005, Gerard 46, 18:56
- Re: Natural gravitation, Don1, 18:26
- Re: Deep question, Phil Holman, 18:15
- Re: 2006 -- THE YEAR OF MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : STRING THEORY IS SO 2003, Bill Hobba, 18:11
- Re: Mixed up between Hydraulic and Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:50
- Re: Mixed up between Hydraulic and Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?, PD, 17:32
- Re: 2006 -- THE YEAR OF MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : STRING THEORY IS SO 2003, Dr Tim, 17:19
- Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy, PD, 17:15
- Re: Beethoven's Ode to Joy as a sacred song, donstockbauer, 17:07
- Re: Waves, FrediFizzx, 16:55
- Re: Negative pressure question, Phil Holman, 16:26
- Re: Mixed up between Hydraulic and Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?, Der alte Hexenmeister, 16:23
- Re: Potter's annual Christmas gift., Der alte Hexenmeister, 16:15
- Re: Deep question, tj Frazir, 16:11
- Re: about Fraunhofer diffraction at a single narrow slit, tadchem, 16:00
- Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005, tj Frazir, 15:52
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, donstockbauer, 15:52
- Re: Waves, srp, 15:49
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kk, 15:42
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, QncyMI, 15:41
- Re: Waves, Der alte Hexenmeister, 15:40
- Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005, donstockbauer, 15:32
- Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005, Traveler, 15:28
- Re: 2006 -- THE YEAR OF MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : STRING THEORY IS SO 2003, drelliot, 15:18
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:08
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 14:51
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Anonymous, 14:30
- Re-Simplified: Mixed up between Hydraulic & Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?, guskz, 14:02
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 13:55
- Mixed up between Hydraulic and Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?, guskz, 13:44
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 13:34
- Re: 2006 -- THE YEAR OF MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : STRING THEORY IS SO 2003, Immortalist, 13:04
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, brian a m stuckless, 12:59
- Re: GPS and satellite clocks, Helmut Wabnig, 12:57
- about Fraunhofer diffraction at a single narrow slit, Gyan, 12:21
- Re: Uncle Al, Al Zenner, 12:09
- Re: A question regarding opposing vectors and rolling friction, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:52
- Re: 2006 -- THE YEAR OF MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : STRING THEORY IS SO 2003, hanson, 11:31
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:25
- Re: Natural gravitation, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:18
- Re: Natural gravitation, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:15
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 11:11
- Re: 2006 -- THE YEAR OF MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : STRING THEORY IS SO 2003, Sam Wormley, 10:58
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:54
- Re: Newton Second Law of Motion, rusty, 10:47
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:46
- Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it., Y.Porat, 10:45
- Re: Negative pressure question, Ian Parker, 10:39
- Re: Mirrors, nick.ascione@xxxxxxxxx, 10:38
- Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Jan Panteltje, 10:30
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Mark Fergerson, 10:21
- Re: Quantized Elevator Gedankenexperiment?, Mark Fergerson, 10:19
- Re: Newton Second Law of Motion, PD, 10:16
- Re: Absolute size., PD, 10:06
- "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Skrow, 10:02
- Re: Mirrors, Mark Fergerson, 09:56
- Re: Natural gravitation, Eric Gisse, 09:51
- Mirrors, nick.ascione@xxxxxxxxx, 09:44
- 2006 -- THE YEAR OF MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : STRING THEORY IS SO 2003, drelliot, 09:20
- Re: Deep question, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:11
- Re: Deep question, PD, 09:01
- Re: Natural gravitation, PD, 08:43
- Re: Uncle Al, Traveler, 08:38
- Re: Beethoven's Ode to Joy as a sacred song, Archimedes Plutonium, 08:04
- Re: Beethoven's Ode to Joy as a sacred song, Howard, 08:02
- Negative pressure question, flint, 07:55
- Happy New Year to you all!, Sergey Karavashkin, 07:43
- Re: Newton Second Law of Motion, Autymn D. C., 07:04
- Re: Natural gravitation, Don1, 06:55
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, glbrad01, 06:03
- Re: Waves, Autymn D. C., 05:47
- Re: Deep question, Mike, 04:59
- Re: Deep question, Mike, 04:55
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, AKA gray asphalt, 04:44
- Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy, Ian Parker, 04:03
- Re: gun angle, Ian Parker, 03:56
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Autymn D. C., 03:47
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Autymn D. C., 03:44
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Autymn D. C., 03:42
- Space and entanglement, Johan, 03:32
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Autymn D. C., 03:30
- Geometry-Dependent Temperature, OsherD, 03:29
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Autymn D. C., 03:14
- Re: Uncle Al, Y.Porat, 03:06
- Re: Absolute size., Sam Wormley, 01:23
- Absolute size., Happy Hippy, 01:12
- Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc., tj Frazir, 01:02
- Re: Potter's annual Christmas gift., tj Frazir, 00:54
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Happy Hippy, 00:52
- Re: 9/11 Update: Listen to the WTC floor collapses (911Eyewitness), tj Frazir, 00:52
- Re: Uncle Al, Autymn D. C., 00:45
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, newedana, 00:43
- Re: Microwave Boilers : Investors Wanted : The Microwave Hot Water..., tj Frazir, 00:43
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:42
- Re: gun angle, tj Frazir, 00:37
- Re: gun angle, tj Frazir, 00:33
- Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy, tj Frazir, 00:21
- Re: Natural gravitation, tj Frazir, 00:15
- Re: Natural gravitation, tj Frazir, 00:11
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Autymn D. C., 00:05
- Re: Deep question, tj Frazir, 00:02
December 29, 2005
- Re: Deep question, tdp1001, 23:59
- Re: Deep question, tj Frazir, 23:58
- Re: Raymond Ronald Karczewski, don't report Jaimie Eckles/dr.Firema..., tj Frazir, 23:52
- Re: Waves, srp, 23:49
- Re: Raymond Ronald Karczewski, don't report Jaimie Eckles/dr.Firema..., tj Frazir, 23:35
- Beethoven's Ode to Joy as a sacred song, a_plutonium, 23:30
- Light for Students optical vintage book 1902 FA, JaneyP, 21:36
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, glbrad01, 21:25
- Re: Waves, Der alte Hexenmeister, 21:12
- Re: BNAG THAT BANK, John, 20:59
- Re: dear fegets and other sorts of cocksuckers, Jim Black, 20:53
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, glbrad01, 20:48
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Timo Nieminen, 20:44
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Tom Roberts, 20:11
- Re: GPS -- 38 microsec/d drift -- Androcles, Eric Gisse, 19:51
- Re: A question regarding opposing vectors and rolling friction, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 19:31
- Re: BNAG THAT BANK, hhc314, 18:57
- Re: Uncle Al, Al Zenner, 17:50
- Re: A question regarding opposing vectors and rolling friction, PD, 17:43
- Re: A question regarding opposing vectors and rolling friction, Der alte Hexenmeister, 17:37
- Re: GPS -- 38 microsec/d drift -- Androcles, Henri Wilson, 17:30
- BNAG THAT BANK, dedanoe, 17:18
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, PD, 17:14
- Re: Deep question, tadchem, 17:11
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, sbs, 16:55
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, Hero . van . Jindelt, 16:43
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, PD, 16:41
- Re: Energy Loss in an Isolated Hydrogen Atom, srp, 16:41
- Re: GPS -- 38 microsec/d drift -- Androcles, Der alte Hexenmeister, 16:35
- Re: Waves, srp, 16:32
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, PD, 16:26
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, sbs, 16:00
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, sbs, 15:46
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Tom Roberts, 15:40
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, AKA gray asphalt, 15:39
- Re: Uncle Al, Greysky, 15:35
- Re: Natural gravitation, PD, 15:29
- Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 22 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, carlip-nospam, 15:26
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 15:19
- Re: Deep question, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
- Re: Waves, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, PD, 14:50
- Energy Loss in an Isolated Hydrogen Atom, Michael J. Strickland, 14:48
- Re: Deep question, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:45
- A question regarding opposing vectors and rolling friction, brian452, 14:24
- Re: Deep question, Michael J. Strickland, 14:21
- Re: Computer Simulations of Spacetime, MobyDikc, 14:20
- Re: Waves, Timo Nieminen, 14:18
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, Timo Nieminen, 14:10
- Re: Uncle Al, Traveler, 14:08
- GPS -- 38 microsec/d drift -- Androcles, hanson, 13:58
- Re: Deep question, John, 13:44
- Re: Uncle Al, operator jay, 13:44
- Re: Deep question, John, 13:42
- Re: Uncle Al, operator jay, 13:40
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Fluidly Unsure, 13:37
- Re: Uncle Al, namlohip, 13:28
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, sbs, 13:18
- Re: Uncle Al, Der alte Hexenmeister, 13:09
- Re: Rudiment of Effectuationism Grand Unification Theory, Peter Kinane, 13:06
- Re: Uncle Al, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: Natural gravitation, odin, 12:55
- Re: curses, Greg Neill, 12:47
- Re: Waves, Sam Wormley, 12:41
- Re: Deep question, Mike, 12:25
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, PD, 12:25
- Re: Deep question, Mike, 12:24
- Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy, franklinhu, 12:24
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 12:22
- Re: Natural gravitation, odin, 12:15
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, sbs, 12:13
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 12:12
- Re: Uncle Al, Sam Wormley, 12:04
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
- Re: Natural gravitation, Steve Ralph, 11:54
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, 1Z, 11:48
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, 1Z, 11:48
- Uncle Al, Phil Holman, 11:47
- Re: Deep question, Phil Holman, 11:47
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 11:39
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 11:38
- Re: Deep question, John, 11:36
- Re: Inverse pendulum on a cart problem, Tomas Selnekovic, 11:33
- Re: Natural gravitation, John, 11:32
- Re: Deep question, Der alte Hexenmeister, 11:26
- Re: Deep question, Der alte Hexenmeister, 11:24
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 11:23
- Re: frequency division multiplexing - many waves down a wire!?!, Der alte Hexenmeister, 11:14
- Re: Waves, Der alte Hexenmeister, 11:08
- Re: Deep question, Mike, 11:02
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, PD, 10:51
- Re: Deep question, Phil Holman, 10:47
- Re: Waves, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:42
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:35
- Re: Deep question, Mike, 10:31
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:21
- Re: frequency division multiplexing - many waves down a wire!?!, jimp, 10:20
- Re: Waves, PD, 10:17
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, jesper pedersen, 10:13
- Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy, PD, 10:06
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Autymn D. C., 10:02
- Waves, oisin, 10:02
- "The Einstein Hoax", Skrow, 09:56
- Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:52
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:49
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, Sam Wormley, 09:42
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, surrealistic-dream, 09:33
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, brian a m stuckless, 09:27
- Deep question, tdp1001, 09:25
- Natural gravitation, Don1, 09:22
- Re: frequency division multiplexing - many waves down a wire!?!, Helmut Wabnig, 09:10
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Autymn D. C., 09:00
- frequency division multiplexing - many waves down a wire!?!, q_q_anonymous, 08:44
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, Martin Hogbin, 07:48
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 06:55
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, donstockbauer, 06:43
- Re: The physics of a vagina ..., donstockbauer, 06:36
- Re: dear fegets and other sorts of cocksuckers, donstockbauer, 06:21
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, donstockbauer, 06:17
- Re: Newton Second Law of Motion, Dastardly Fiend, 06:17
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 06:14
- Re: Inverse pendulum on a cart problem, tadchem, 05:50
- Re: Inverse pendulum on a cart problem, Dastardly Fiend, 05:20
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Dastardly Fiend, 05:15
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Dastardly Fiend, 05:06
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, Dastardly Fiend, 05:04
- dear fegets and other sorts of cocksuckers, dedanoe, 04:32
- Re: twin paradox in a void?, Helmut Wabnig, 04:15
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Boris, 02:58
- twin paradox in a void?, sbs, 02:35
- Re: Black Hole Probability-Logic 3: Riccati Differential Equation Control-Feedback, OsherD, 01:51
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:28
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--Not String Theory--Satisfies Einstein's Requirements for a Physical Theory, Bill Hobba, 01:07
- Re: Sorry T.J... The con is up., Blood Money, 00:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, donstockbauer, 00:03
December 28, 2005
- Newton Second Law of Motion, slavek krepelka, 23:57
- Re: The physics of a vagina ..., donstockbauer, 23:46
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Minus XVII, 23:29
- Re: gun angle, donstockbauer, 23:23
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, Minus XVII, 23:22
- Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy, donstockbauer, 23:20
- Re: Black Hole Probability-Logic 3: Riccati Differential Equation Control-Feedback, OsherD, 23:20
- Re: gun angle, jimp, 23:20
- Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy, Sam Wormley, 23:19
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--Not String Theory--Satisfies Einstein's Requirements for a Physical Theory, AKA gray asphalt, 23:17
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Happy Hippy, 23:14
- Re: Newton Second Law of Motion, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 23:09
- Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy, srp, 23:08
- Re: Black Hole Probability-Logic 3: Riccati Differential Equation Control-Feedback, OsherD, 23:03
- Re: Newton Second Law of Motion, Eric Gisse, 23:02
- Re: Black Hole Probability-Logic 3: Riccati Differential Equation Control-Feedback, OsherD, 22:41
- Newton Second Law of Motion, slavek krepelka, 22:28
- Black Hole Probability-Logic 3: Riccati Differential Equation Control-Feedback, OsherD, 22:24
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Art Deco, 22:08
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:29
- Re: gun angle, Tony, 21:29
- Re: Newton Second Law of Motion, jimp, 21:25
- Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy, Drifta12, 21:22
- Re: gun angle, jimp, 21:10
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Rick Bass, 20:31
- Re: Newton Second Law of Motion, Sam Wormley, 20:19
- Microwave Boilers : Investors Wanted : The Microwave Hot Water Boiler Heating System Company Increased Thermionic Emissions 1000x high energy electrons, Br Dan Izzo, 20:12
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bob Cain, 19:46
- Inverse pendulum on a cart problem, Tomas Selnekovic, 19:45
- Re: gun angle, Greg Neill, 19:23
- Re: gun angle, Tony, 19:21
- Re: gun angle, mike123106, 18:49
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 18:23
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--Not String Theory--Satisfies Einstein's Requirements for a Physical Theory, Bill Hobba, 18:15
- Super Cosmos 2006 now online, Jack Sarfatti, 18:05
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Dastardly Fiend, 17:29
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--Not String Theory--Satisfies Einstein's Requirements for a Physical Theory, Dastardly Fiend, 17:04
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, brian a m stuckless, 17:03
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 16:53
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, AKA gray asphalt, 16:10
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--Not String Theory--Satisfies Einstein's Requirements for a Physical Theory, AKA gray asphalt, 16:02
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--Not String Theory--Satisfies Einstein's Requirements for a Physical Theory, AKA gray asphalt, 15:59
- Re: gun angle, PD, 15:58
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Tom Roberts, 15:53
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bob Cain, 15:45
- Re: gun angle, jimp, 15:40
- Re: Computer Simulations of Spacetime, MobyDikc, 15:36
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:33
- "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Skrow, 14:56
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 14:28
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 14:27
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., donstockbauer, 14:03
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., donstockbauer, 14:03
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, Immortalist, 14:01
- Re: Pope Calls for a New World Order, donstockbauer, 13:58
- Sarfatti refutes Haisch-Puthoff Zero Point Energy Theory, Jack Sarfatti, 13:45
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., surrealistic-dream, 13:22
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 13:18
- Black Hole Probability-Logic 2: Radiation vs Matter Difference Arises, OsherD, 12:39
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Bruce Scott TOK, 12:25
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Bruce Scott TOK, 12:19
- Re: gun angle, hfs2, 12:04
- numerology, gastrofil, 11:41
- Re: Black Hole Probability-Logic, OsherD, 11:39
- Re: gun angle, Boy Seattle's Donny Carlito, 11:38
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Mike, 11:32
- junk, Tomasz Dabrowski, 11:23
- Re: gun angle, Tony, 11:22
- Re: Black Hole Probability-Logic, OsherD, 11:16
- Black Hole Probability-Logic, OsherD, 11:03
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:51
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Autymn D. C., 10:42
- Re: gun angle, hfs2, 10:31
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Autymn D. C., 10:26
- Re: Supplement to the paper on black holes, PD, 10:15
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 10:05
- Re: Gyral Motion, Don1, 10:03
- Re: Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g), the land surfer, 09:55
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., me, 09:52
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:47
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, the land surfer, 09:45
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:44
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, the land surfer, 09:44
- Re: Supplement to the paper on black holes, the land surfer, 09:43
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, the land surfer, 09:38
- Re: Potter's annual Christmas gift., Dastardly Fiend, 09:33
- Re: Saints Unnamed on 1-27-05, Dastardly Fiend, 09:27
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, BEM, 09:25
- Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc., Dastardly Fiend, 09:23
- Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy, PD, 09:08
- Re: gun angle, Sam Wormley, 09:06
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sue..., 08:54
- Re: gun angle, PD, 08:50
- Re: gun angle, Ian Parker, 08:30
- Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy, Ian Parker, 08:23
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, sudhanva, 08:04
- Re: gun angle, donstockbauer, 08:01
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dastardly Fiend, 07:52
- Vision Development:Cosmology, Dr Nanduri, 07:52
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, donstockbauer, 07:45
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Pmb, 07:36
- Re: gun angle, hfs2, 07:29
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, nightbat, 07:19
- Re: gun angle, PD, 06:56
- gun angle, hfs2, 06:51
- Shadowlands and QM? Infinite Universe and Weirdness?, glbrad01, 06:48
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sue..., 06:45
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sue..., 06:34
- Potter's annual Christmas gift., tdp1001, 05:04
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 04:25
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 03:24
- Re: GCCPKTD: GeometroCombinoControlProbabilityKnowledgeTopoDynamics, OsherD, 02:57
- Re: GCCPKTD: GeometroCombinoControlProbabilityKnowledgeTopoDynamics, OsherD, 02:32
- GCCPKTD: GeometroCombinoControlProbabilityKnowledgeTopoDynamics, OsherD, 02:13
- Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc., tdp1001, 00:54
- Re: A model of the aether, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 00:46
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:43
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:26
- A model of the aether, Carlos L, 00:17
December 27, 2005
- Re: PETRIFIED WOODEN TOOL HANDLE (Turned to Coal).., donstockbauer, 23:43
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 23:43
- Saints Unnamed on 1-27-05, urelian, 23:40
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, srp, 23:20
- PETRIFIED WOODEN TOOL HANDLE (Turned to Coal).., Ed Conrad, 22:35
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Bob, 21:57
- Re: The physics of a vagina ..., donstockbauer, 21:55
- Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it., Gregory L. Hansen, 21:42
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:36
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., donstockbauer, 21:34
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Gregory L. Hansen, 21:17
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:41
- Re: Question about photons, cornofstarchy, 20:07
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Aetherist, 20:00
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Dastardly Fiend, 19:48
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, sameandnot, 19:46
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 19:04
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Eric Gisse, 18:28
- Re: Is this a hardward problem of some kind ?, Edwin, 17:54
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Dastardly Fiend, 17:48
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 17:41
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--Not String Theory--Satisfies Einstein's Requirements for a Physical Theory, Bill Hobba, 17:30
- Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", MadDogR75, 17:08
- Re: Collapse of the wavefunction during the double slit experiment, Mike, 17:04
- Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it., chuckles, 17:03
- Re: Collapse of the wavefunction during the double slit experiment, chuckles, 17:01
- Re: water pressure, CWatters, 16:50
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Mike, 16:48
- Re: Great Circle Questions, PD, 16:47
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 16:47
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, AKA gray asphalt, 16:46
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Joe Fischer, 16:46
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--Not String Theory--Satisfies Einstein's Requirements for a Physical Theory, Dastardly Fiend, 16:39
- Re: water pressure, donstockbauer, 16:36
- Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it., PD, 16:36
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Mike, 16:32
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 16:27
- Re: Collapse of the wavefunction during the double slit experiment, srp, 16:25
- Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it., donstockbauer, 16:21
- Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it., chuckles, 16:19
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 16:15
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 16:11
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--Not String Theory--Satisfies Einstein's Requirements for a Physical Theory, AKA gray asphalt, 16:10
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 16:05
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, brian a m stuckless, 15:41
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Dastardly Fiend, 15:26
- Re: Question about photons, donstockbauer, 15:23
- Collapse of the wavefunction during the double slit experiment, chuckles, 15:17
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Dastardly Fiend, 15:12
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Dastardly Fiend, 15:10
- Re: water pressure, CWatters, 15:04
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Gregory L. Hansen, 14:55
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, newedana, 14:26
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, BEM, 14:26
- Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it., Dastardly Fiend, 14:12
- Re: Great Circle Questions, Dastardly Fiend, 13:51
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Bilge, 13:43
- Re: American Buddhism - Critique of Science - Quotations by Dr. Frederick Lenz, Mark Martin, 13:36
- Moving Dimensions Theory--Not String Theory--Satisfies Einstein's Requirements for a Physical Theory, jollyrogership, 13:30
- Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, Jan Panteltje, 13:22
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Dastardly Fiend, 13:18
- Re: water pressure, Dastardly Fiend, 12:55
- Re: water pressure, Dastardly Fiend, 12:51
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:37
- Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, tj Frazir, 12:20
- Re: water pressure, tj Frazir, 12:13
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dastardly Fiend, 12:08
- You cannot observe anything without affecting it., chuckles, 12:08
- Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy, Sam Wormley, 12:07
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT..., tj Frazir, 12:03
- New laser printer f_cked up my system ?, Jeff_Relf, 12:00
- Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy, Happy Hippy, 11:56
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Pmb, 11:52
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Dastardly Fiend, 11:50
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Gregory L. Hansen, 11:29
- Re: water pressure, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 11:15
- Covariance in error analysis., Gregory L. Hansen, 11:11
- Re: water pressure, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 11:11
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Dastardly Fiend, 11:07
- Re: Question about photons, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:00
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:47
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Gregory L. Hansen, 10:44
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:39
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, YBM, 10:37
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Tom Roberts, 10:30
- Re: water pressure, PD, 10:27
- Re: Look for active plasma group, Bruce Scott TOK, 10:26
- Re: Maxwell Equations - need some help, Bruce Scott TOK, 10:23
- Re: The physics of a vagina ..., Rene Tschaggelar, 10:22
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Tom Roberts, 10:16
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Tom Roberts, 10:11
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 10:04
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 09:59
- Re: The physics of a vagina ..., Dastardly Fiend, 09:55
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 09:53
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:44
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Dastardly Fiend, 09:37
- Re: Question about photons, PD, 09:34
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Don, 09:31
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 09:30
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Dastardly Fiend, 09:22
- Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Jan Panteltje, 09:20
- "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Egap, 09:03
- dedanoe's double denial, dedanoe, 08:55
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Bilge, 08:17
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 07:49
- Re: The physics of a vagina ..., donstockbauer, 07:31
- Re: How do I undo MiroSoft's updates ?, Jan Panteltje, 07:14
- Re: THE Idiot Le Turd leaving Soon (again), donstockbauer, 07:08
- Re: Quantized Elevator Gedankenexperiment?, Jan Panteltje, 07:07
- Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, Dr . Lead, 07:04
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, donstockbauer, 07:04
- Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, Jan Panteltje, 07:00
- Nice article on Quantum mechanics and EPR and BS and cats on nytimes.com, Jan Panteltje, 06:58
- Re: Question about photons, donstockbauer, 06:55
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, donstockbauer, 06:49
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, Martin Eisenberg, 06:38
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Dutch, 05:35
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 05:01
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 04:51
- Re: Question about photons, Timo Nieminen, 04:42
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Joe Fischer, 03:57
- GR death throes., brian a m stuckless, 03:03
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, brian a m stuckless, 03:03
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Dastardly Fiend, 02:59
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Dastardly Fiend, 02:58
- How do I undo MiroSoft's updates ?, Jeff_Relf, 02:51
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 02:51
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 02:50
- Re: Question about photons, Sam Wormley, 02:43
- Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy, Sam Wormley, 02:41
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Bill Hobba, 02:36
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 02:35
- Re: Question about photons, FrediFizzx, 02:27
- Nature of dark matter and dark energy, franklinhu, 02:18
- Re: The physics of a vagina ..., hanson, 01:57
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, magic math tricks, 01:53
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 01:32
- We’ve been through fake breakdowns, self hurt, plastics..., Jeff_Relf, 01:26
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 01:20
- Question about photons, cornofstarchy, 01:19
- We’ve been through fake breakdowns, self hurt, plastics..., Jeff_Relf, 01:15
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Kees Roos, 01:08
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Joe Fischer, 01:04
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 00:47
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Bill Hobba, 00:37
December 26, 2005
- Re: The physics of a vagina ..., donstockbauer, 23:08
- Re: American Buddhism - Critique of Science - Quotations by Dr. Frederick Lenz, donstockbauer, 23:01
- American Buddhism - Critique of Science - Quotations by Dr. Frederick Lenz, ramaquotes, 22:56
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Gregory L. Hansen, 22:45
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Gregory L. Hansen, 22:39
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, YBM, 22:12
- Re: String langscapes and vacuum decay, glbrad01, 22:09
- Re: water pressure, Adnan, 20:50
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Dastardly Fiend, 20:47
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Gregory L. Hansen, 20:43
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Gregory L. Hansen, 20:39
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Dastardly Fiend, 20:39
- Re: How can the first derivative with respect to time be proportional to the second derivative with respect to space, unless the dimensions are moving relative to one-another?, Bret Cahill, 20:36
- Re: water pressure, tadchem, 20:20
- Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, tadchem, 20:06
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Tom Roberts, 20:06
- Re: A new TOE: Spring theory explains everything, Hero . van . Jindelt, 20:03
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, tadchem, 19:59
- qm2 highlights 2001-2005, vznuri, 19:58
- Re: water pressure, Adnan, 19:54
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., tadchem, 19:42
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:41
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:35
- Re: water pressure, jimp, 19:30
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Bill Hobba, 19:29
- Re: How can the first derivative with respect to time be proportional to the second derivative with respect to space, unless the dimensions are moving relative to one-another?, tom jones, 19:26
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 19:12
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Bilge, 18:58
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 18:56
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 18:54
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 18:51
- Re: water pressure, Adnan, 18:50
- Re: How Can Here Be There? Entanglement united with relativity., Wordsmith, 18:35
- Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, tj Frazir, 18:34
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 18:32
- Quantized Elevator Gedankenexperiment?, Mark Fergerson, 18:24
- Re: MICROSATELLITES; how small? How cheap?, tj Frazir, 18:21
- Re: How Can Here Be There? Entanglement united with relativity., Bill Hobba, 18:20
- Re: How can the first derivative with respect to time be proportional to the second derivative with respect to space, unless the dimensions are moving relative to one-another?, Bill Hobba, 18:18
- Re: Gyral Motion, Don1, 18:15
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Hero, 18:08
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Bill Hobba, 18:08
- Re: Rudiment of Effectuationism Grand Unification Theory, pkinane, 18:04
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 17:15
- Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, Dr . Lead, 17:14
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, RP, 17:02
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 16:57
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Jem, 16:52
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:41
- Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, Mike Jr., 16:40
- Re: Gyral Motion, Hero . van . Jindelt, 16:30
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, Androcles, 16:13
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:36
- Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., Immortalist, 15:18
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Mike, 15:13
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, Immortalist, 14:57
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Mike, 14:53
- Re: How can the first derivative with respect to time be proportional to the second derivative with respect to space, unless the dimensions are moving relative to one-another?, Androcles, 14:49
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:38
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 14:16
- Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity., jollyrogership, 13:51
- Re: Unlike me, Nietzsche knew not who or what God really was., Enoch Root, 13:47
- Re: How can the first derivative with respect to time be proportional to the second derivative with respect to space, unless the dimensions are moving relative to one-another?, jollyrogership, 13:45
- Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, Dr . Lead, 13:37
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 13:28
- Re: How can the first derivative with respect to time be proportional to the second derivative with respect to space, unless the dimensions are moving relative to one-another?, Bob, 13:22
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 13:21
- Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, CWatters, 13:12
- Re: How can the first derivative with respect to time be proportional to the second derivative with respect to space, unless the dimensions are moving relative to one-another?, gentile, 13:11
- Re: Sub-Planck scales, Sam Wormley, 12:44
- Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, Dr . Lead, 12:44
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, jollyrogership, 12:35
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, G. R. L. Cowan, 12:35
- Re: How can the first derivative with respect to time be proportional to the second derivative with respect to space, unless the dimensions are moving relative to one-another?, Bret Cahill, 12:35
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, The Real Bev, 12:35
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Mike, 12:32
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, Martin Eisenberg, 12:22
- How can the first derivative with respect to time be proportional to the second derivative with respect to space, unless the dimensions are moving relative to one-another?, jollyrogership, 12:22
- Re: Sub-Planck scales, Happy Hippy, 12:00
- "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Skrow, 12:00
- Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, Richard Henry, 12:00
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, FED UP, 11:50
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:46
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, FED UP, 11:44
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:13
- How to make this clean water generator radiation free?, Dr . Lead, 11:03
- Re: How Can Here Be There? Entanglement united with relativity., jollyrogership, 10:43
- Re: How Can Here Be There? Entanglement united with relativity., NaCl, 10:38
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 10:35
- Re: How Can Here Be There? Entanglement united with relativity., jollyrogership, 10:33
- Re: The physics of a vagina ..., Androcles, 10:30
- Re: The Physics of Santa Claus, Androcles, 10:29
- Re: How Can Here Be There? Entanglement united with relativity., NaCl, 10:28
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 10:27
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, surrealistic-dream, 10:22
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Mike, 10:02
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Al Zenner, 09:55
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 09:33
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Don, 09:24
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 09:14
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, donstockbauer, 09:14
- Re: Is this a hardward problem of some kind ?, donstockbauer, 09:07
- Astronomers Gain Clues About Fundamental Physics, Mike Jr., 09:05
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Mark Fergerson, 09:03
- Re: THE GREAT SYDNEY QUAKE _Critical Window Opening Soon_ !!!!, donstockbauer, 09:02
- New Horizons spacecraft, Mike Jr., 09:02
- How Can Here Be There? Entanglement united with relativity., jollyrogership, 08:58
- podcast_plasma_thruster, Mike Jr., 08:57
- Re: Is this a hardward problem of some kind ?, m, 08:55
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, rusmann555, 08:55
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, surrealistic-dream, 08:43
- Re: Is this a hardward problem of some kind ?, Paul Cardinale, 08:27
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 07:55
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 07:38
- Re: A new TOE: Spring theory explains everything, Jan Panteltje, 07:18
- Re: Superstring Life Theory, charbot, 07:10
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, drelliot, 07:07
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, drelliot, 07:06
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, drelliot, 07:06
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 06:54
- Re: String langscapes and vacuum decay, tadchem, 06:50
- Superstring Life Theory, glbrad01, 06:41
- Superstring Life Theory, glbrad01, 06:41
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, jmfbahciv, 06:36
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, tadchem, 06:33
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, freezer, 06:32
- String langscapes and vacuum decay, Russell Wallace, 06:24
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 06:23
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, tadchem, 06:20
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 06:20
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Hero, 06:18
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 06:17
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 06:16
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 06:13
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 06:12
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, EvolBob, 06:04
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Bill Hobba, 05:52
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 26, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:44
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, Autymn D. C., 05:38
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, Autymn D. C., 05:34
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Hero, 05:32
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Autymn D. C., 05:01
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Autymn D. C., 04:56
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Autymn D. C., 04:54
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Autymn D. C., 04:47
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Autymn D. C., 04:45
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Autymn D. C., 04:43
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Autymn D. C., 04:37
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Autymn D. C., 04:28
- Re: water pressure, CWatters, 04:24
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 04:22
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 04:19
- Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space...., glbrad01, 04:00
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 03:59
- Re: Why posters like Autymn D.C. are... no, I won't go there... ;), Autymn D. C., 03:37
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Y.Porat, 01:49
- Re: Sub-Planck scales, Sam Wormley, 01:43
- Sub-Planck scales, Happy Hippy, 01:14
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Eric Gisse, 00:11
December 25, 2005
- Is this a hardward problem of some kind ?, Jeff_Relf, 22:42
- Re: The physics of a vagina ..., Spike, 22:15
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Traveler, 22:13
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Androcles, 21:49
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Androcles, 21:47
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 21:44
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Richard Henry, 21:41
- The physics of a vagina ..., Todd Airsushi, 21:03
- my argument with the authorities, dedanoe, 20:50
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:43
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Mark Martin, 20:40
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Phil Holman, 20:29
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Gregory L. Hansen, 20:27
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, Gregory L. Hansen, 20:07
- Re: newbie question, Gregory L. Hansen, 20:00
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 19:55
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, robert . w . adams, 19:51
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, RP, 19:48
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 19:27
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, gruhn, 19:10
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Bilge, 18:56
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Bilge, 18:54
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Ken S. Tucker, 18:41
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Richard Henry, 18:34
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 18:32
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Ken S. Tucker, 18:13
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Bill Hobba, 18:10
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Bill Hobba, 18:06
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Bill Hobba, 17:58
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Mark Martin, 17:53
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Traveler, 17:42
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, ~^Johnny^~, 17:31
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, ipcress, 17:19
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Hero . van . Jindelt, 17:02
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:00
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 16:49
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, RicodJour, 16:42
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Ken S. Tucker, 16:38
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Hero, 16:22
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Richard Henry, 16:17
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Ken S. Tucker, 16:13
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 15:59
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Syd Mead, 15:57
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, RicodJour, 15:42
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, gruhn, 15:29
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Bilge, 15:21
- Re: water pressure, Adnan, 15:01
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Ken S. Tucker, 15:00
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Bilge, 14:57
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:54
- Re: Apollo XIIIX hoax, Richard Henry, 14:50
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 14:44
- Apollo XIIIX hoax, Ken S. Tucker, 14:30
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, drelliot, 14:30
- Re: Great Circle Questions, Phil Holman, 13:55
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, FrediFizzx, 13:52
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 13:25
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 13:21
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:12
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Y.Porat, 13:08
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 13:04
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Mark Martin, 13:04
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 13:02
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 12:57
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 12:47
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, DjApAnA, 12:47
- Re: Great Circle Questions, tadchem, 12:42
- Re: Great Circle Questions, Phil Holman, 12:28
- Re: Michael Faraday, Badduh, 12:03
- Re: Great Circle Questions, tadchem, 12:02
- Michael Faraday, Mkajuma, 11:53
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 11:47
- Re: newbie question, srp, 11:44
- Re: Great Circle Questions, Dr. Di, 11:40
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Turtoni, 11:39
- A THOUGHT FOR TOMORROW (Please Read Today)., Ed Conrad, 11:37
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 11:36
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Bob, 11:21
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:17
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Mark Fergerson, 11:15
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, drelliot, 11:14
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Mark Fergerson, 11:14
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:09
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:08
- Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space...., Mark Martin, 11:07
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:06
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:04
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Turtoni, 11:00
- Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, Mark Martin, 11:00
- Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space...., Mark Martin, 10:57
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Turtoni, 10:55
- Look for active plasma group, mustafa umut sarac, 10:51
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 10:36
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Mark Fergerson, 10:34
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 10:34
- Great Circle Questions, Robert11, 10:31
- Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?, jollyrogership, 10:27
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, DjApAnA, 10:12
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:03
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 09:48
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 09:45
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, RP, 09:34
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 09:31
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:11
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, drelliot, 09:07
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:04
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Y.Porat, 08:58
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 08:55
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 08:46
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:18
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:14
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, jollyrogership, 08:12
- "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Elgnis, 08:10
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Androcles, 08:07
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Androcles, 08:06
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Sue..., 08:02
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, DjApAnA, 07:55
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, jollyrogership, 07:51
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Eric Gisse, 07:45
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Sue..., 07:17
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, jmfbahciv, 07:09
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 07:01
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Sue..., 07:00
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, José, 06:53
- A new TOE: Spring theory explains everything, Prof . Chi M . Panzee, 06:22
- Re: water pressure, CWatters, 06:17
- Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space...., glbrad01, 05:37
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Y.Porat, 05:01
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Y.Porat, 04:04
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 03:19
- Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 10: Geometrodynamics and Einstein-Aether Theory, OsherD, 03:04
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 03:00
- Re: Why posters like Autymn D.C. are... no, I won't go there... ;), The Ghost In The Machine, 03:00
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 02:50
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 02:39
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:31
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:09
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:02
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 01:57
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 01:38
- Re: Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 9: Superstring/Brane Vibration Can Be Regarded As Geometric-Topological Change, OsherD, 01:29
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 01:24
- Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 9: Superstring/Brane Vibration Can Be Regarded As Geometric-Topological Change, OsherD, 01:16
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 00:44
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Tom Roberts, 00:36
- Re: How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, Sir Frederick, 00:25
- Re: Why posters like Autymn D.C. are... no, I won't go there... ;), Autymn D. C., 00:10
December 24, 2005
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Autymn D. C., 23:46
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Autymn D. C., 23:43
- Re: newbie question, Buddah, 23:33
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Autymn D. C., 23:21
- How far does a photon move in the time dimension when it travels for one second?, jollyrogership, 23:07
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: water pressure, Adnan, 21:32
- This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 225), John Baez, 21:20
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 21:01
- Re: water pressure, Adnan, 20:56
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 20:41
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, robert . w . adams, 20:18
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 20:01
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:57
- Re: water pressure, kaatucan@xxxxxxxxx, 19:49
- newbie question, Gert Baars, 19:46
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Bret Cahill, 19:35
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 19:11
- Re: The Hymn of Einstein's Cult, tj Frazir, 19:09
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 18:58
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 18:41
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, K. Jones, 18:25
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 18:03
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 17:34
- water pressure, Adnan, 17:06
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:00
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:00
- GRAVITATION EXPLAINED, ACE, 16:43
- Re: History of Physics - Einstein and the Cosmological Constant, Joe Fischer, 15:59
- Re: History of Physics - Einstein and the Cosmological Constant, Androcles, 15:53
- Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space...., Mark Martin, 15:27
- History of Physics - Einstein and the Cosmological Constant, Robert Karl Stonjek, 15:26
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, Bill Hobba, 15:26
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:19
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Eric Gisse, 15:09
- Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space...., glbrad01, 15:00
- Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space...., Happy Hippy, 14:31
- Re: Maxwell Equations - need some help, moatesim, 14:30
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 13:41
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 13:27
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, surrealistic-dream, 13:07
- Re: Unlike me, Jeff_Relf twat knew not who or what God really was., 7, 13:07
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:02
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 12:55
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, surrealistic-dream, 12:48
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 12:33
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Y.Porat, 12:29
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 12:09
- Unlike me, Nietzsche knew not who or what God really was., Jeff_Relf, 12:00
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:57
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:35
- "The Nature of Mass", Elgnis, 10:44
- Re: Gravitational Radiation, Sam Wormley, 10:41
- Re: Gravitational Radiation, Happy Hippy, 10:26
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, kumar, 10:16
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 10:14
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Y.Porat, 10:04
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:01
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, jollyrogership, 09:43
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, jollyrogership, 09:40
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, jmfbahciv, 09:29
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 09:20
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 09:17
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, jmfbahciv, 09:10
- From "Science News" of the Year 2005, Sam Wormley, 09:06
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:02
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, donstockbauer, 09:01
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Dianelos Georgoudis, 08:57
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 08:56
- A Cabinet of Mathematical Curiosities, Sam Wormley, 08:56
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 08:50
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 08:48
- Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space...., donstockbauer, 08:43
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, donstockbauer, 08:30
- Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space...., donstockbauer, 08:16
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, donstockbauer, 08:13
- The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space...., glbrad01, 08:10
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Y.Porat, 08:07
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Y.Porat, 08:00
- How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 07:55
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 07:43
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:47
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Y.Porat, 06:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 06:24
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Seeker, 06:00
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 05:50
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:36
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 05:06
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 05:03
- The Physics of Santa Claus, Zenflow, 04:17
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Androcles, 03:59
- Re: Paper: Photons and electrons as emergent phenomena, FrediFizzx, 02:54
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:45
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, FrediFizzx, 02:24
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Y.Porat, 01:59
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Dianelos Georgoudis, 01:41
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Angelo, 01:31
December 23, 2005
- Re: e = mc^2 ques, srp, 23:36
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Turtoni, 22:35
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Turtoni, 22:32
- Paper: Photons and electrons as emergent phenomena, Timo Nieminen, 22:24
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Randy Poe, 22:14
- e = mc^2 ques, bob, 22:01
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, jonathan, 21:52
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, FrediFizzx, 21:41
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Timo Nieminen, 21:26
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:26
- Re: Call for Papers: CSC'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06), donstockbauer, 21:15
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:09
- Re: Instantly Travel From Anywhere to Anywhere!, Brian Fletcher, 21:00
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:56
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Traveler, 20:56
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:32
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Randy Poe, 20:31
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:29
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 20:15
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:10
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 19:45
- Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 22 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, RP, 19:34
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 19:23
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 18:48
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Androcles, 18:45
- Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 22 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, carlip-nospam, 18:42
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Androcles, 18:42
- Re: Maxwell Equations - need some help, Jason Stanidge, 18:36
- Re: Instantly Travel From Anywhere to Anywhere!, Traveler, 17:44
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, srp, 17:43
- Re: Instantly Travel From Anywhere to Anywhere!, Traveler, 17:40
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, harald . vanlintel, 17:25
- Re: Instantly Travel From Anywhere to Anywhere!, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:16
- Re: Instantly Travel From Anywhere to Anywhere!, Bret Cahill, 17:11
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., harald . vanlintel, 16:59
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 16:51
- Re: Instantly Travel From Anywhere to Anywhere!, Wordsmith, 16:47
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 16:46
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Tom Roberts, 16:46
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 16:35
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 16:25
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 16:24
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 16:17
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Greg Neill, 16:11
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 16:07
- Re: Instantly Travel From Anywhere to Anywhere!, Bret Cahill, 16:07
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 16:03
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 16:02
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 15:59
- Instantly Travel From Anywhere to Anywhere!, Traveler, 15:57
- distances, last-minute shopping tips, John Baez, 15:53
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 15:30
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 15:19
- Re: Call for Papers: CSC'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06), Infinity, 15:18
- Re: Maxwell Equations - need some help, Randy Poe, 14:54
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 14:50
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 14:38
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Timo Nieminen, 14:36
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 14:34
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 14:32
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 14:26
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Sam Wormley, 14:21
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 14:19
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Mike Jr., 14:16
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 14:14
- Re: Maxwell Equations - need some help, Bruce Scott TOK, 14:09
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 14:00
- Re: Santa Claus at Nearly the Speed of Light, donstockbauer, 13:54
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, donstockbauer, 13:44
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:36
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Androcles, 13:33
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 224), Androcles, 13:29
- Re: Gyral Motion, Don1, 13:15
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:06
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Dec 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 12:50
- Re: Gyral Motion, odin, 12:46
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Justin Ape, 12:41
- Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 8: Almeida of U. do Minho Portugal, OsherD, 12:24
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:18
- Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 7: m = f(x, v, etc.), OsherD, 12:08
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 12:02
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 11:46
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Androcles, 11:45
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 11:40
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 11:38
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 11:36
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, kumar, 11:35
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:01
- Re: Gyral Motion, Don1, 11:00
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:00
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 10:58
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 10:55
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 10:52
- Maxwell Equations - need some help, moatesim, 10:49
- "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Elgnis, 10:08
- Merry Christmas, The_Red_Telephone, 10:04
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, Stuart, 09:53
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, Mark Fergerson, 09:44
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:29
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:23
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Paul B. Andersen, 09:21
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Sam Wormley, 09:14
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:09
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 09:07
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., surrealistic-dream, 09:06
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, Andy Resnick, 08:50
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, No One, 08:29
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:27
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 08:26
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, jmfbahciv, 08:24
- Re: dedanoe is distant relative to Alexander The Macedonian also know as The Great, dedanoe, 08:22
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, jmfbahciv, 08:21
- My broken will reveals the codes of my own Zion, dedanoe, 08:21
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:06
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:05
- Re: Merry Newtonmas, Michael E.Marotta, 08:01
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:57
- Re: Photons got me arrested!, donstockbauer, 07:50
- Re: TO ALL IN AUSTRALIA NOW, donstockbauer, 07:46
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 07:41
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, donstockbauer, 07:40
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Y.Porat, 07:33
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, jmfbahciv, 07:31
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, jmfbahciv, 07:28
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 07:09
- Re: 9-11 "Coincidences", PD, 07:09
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 07:06
- Photons got me arrested!, Spike, 06:57
- New version of the free Blender open source graphics creation program can do surface fluid simultion., King Kong, 06:40
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:21
- Science magazine's breakthroughs of 2005, Robert Karl Stonjek, 06:11
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Angelo, 05:48
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 05:45
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 05:44
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 05:37
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 05:35
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 05:34
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 05:29
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Ilja Schmelzer, 05:25
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 05:18
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:11
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Bilge, 05:01
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bilge, 04:59
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 04:37
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 04:36
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 04:29
- Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 22 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, RP, 03:50
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Y.Porat, 03:43
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 03:23
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 02:45
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 02:27
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Ilja Schmelzer, 02:23
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 01:54
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Angelo, 01:28
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Timo Nieminen, 01:24
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 01:17
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 01:17
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Bilge, 01:09
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:47
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:41
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:36
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:27
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 00:20
- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 22 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 00:14
- Review of the year, Sam Wormley, 00:13
December 22, 2005
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, Jo Schaper, 23:12
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 23:09
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, kumar, 23:07
- Re: Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 6: Variable Exponents Explain Dimensional Homogeneity, OsherD, 23:03
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 22:56
- Re: dedanoe is distant relative to Alexander The Macedonian also know as The Great, Mark Martin, 22:53
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 22:53
- Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 6: Variable Exponents Explain Dimensional Homogeneity, OsherD, 22:50
- Re: dedanoe is distant relative to Alexander The Macedonian also know as The Great, donstockbauer, 22:39
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 22:27
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, jonathan, 22:23
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, jonathan, 22:20
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 22:14
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 22:00
- Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 5: Why Mass Dimension Has Exponent 1, OsherD, 21:58
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 21:48
- Re: Airplanes with flat plate wings, bm459, 21:33
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 21:32
- Re: Feedback in the Universe's Propositions 4: Self-Feedback, OsherD, 21:28
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, George, 21:25
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, hbarwood, 21:14
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Timo Nieminen, 21:13
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 21:13
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, Al Zenner, 21:11
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, Jo Schaper, 21:00
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, Ja ♥, 20:45
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:44
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Dave Typinski, 20:01
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bill Hobba, 19:59
- Re: Speed of light or refractive index, Stuart, 19:55
- curses and faqy, kkurtstocklmeir, 19:55
- Re: => Excellent site for 9-11 research <=, dedanoe, 19:54
- dedanoe is distant relative to Alexander The Macedonian also know as The Great, dedanoe, 19:51
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 19:47
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 19:43
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 19:37
- Speed of light or refractive index, Uhlman, 19:35
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 19:30
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 19:26
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 18:59
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 18:53
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 18:52
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, surrealistic-dream, 18:43
- Re: 9-11 "Coincidences", Hank, 18:40
- => Excellent site for 9-11 research <=, Hank, 18:40
- Re: Proper Frequency, mmeron, 18:31
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 18:30
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Hero, 18:16
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:58
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 17:56
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Angelo, 17:54
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:34
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 17:14
- Re: The IMF is a Thieving_Junky, abusing oil and Iraqis., T Wake, 17:05
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Angelo, 16:59
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 16:58
- Re: Proper Frequency, Timo Nieminen, 16:53
- Re: God likes justice, T Wake, 16:53
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, srp, 16:51
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 16:51
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 16:47
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 16:46
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 16:42
- Re: Proper Frequency, mmeron, 16:41
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 16:37
- If'n you're a Subgenius, yer gonna be needing slack., Jeff_Relf, 15:57
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 15:43
- Re: God creates justice, hanson, 15:17
- Re: God creates justice, hanson, 15:16
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Timo Nieminen, 15:08
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 15:01
- Re: HIV and AIDS are the result of life styles, not viruses., The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
- Re: Proper Frequency, Timo Nieminen, 14:59
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:53
- Re: Maxwell's equations, Maldona8, 14:53
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 224), Ken S. Tucker, 14:41
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 224), Ken S. Tucker, 14:41
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, FrediFizzx, 14:37
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE --- Number 759 December 22, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 14:37
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, surrealistic-dream, 14:33
- Re: Computer Simulations of Spacetime, dedanoe, 14:27
- Re: God likes justice, dedanoe, 14:26
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 14:06
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., stephen, 13:59
- Re: Orbiting planet, Joe Fischer, 13:49
- Re: God likes justice, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:44
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 13:38
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:37
- Re: Computer Simulations of Spacetime, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:36
- Re: God creates justice, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:33
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, MobyDikc, 13:24
- Re: God creates justice, PD, 13:16
- Re: God creates justice, hanson, 13:09
- Re: Smallest time quantum delta t?, tycho bracket, 13:06
- Computer Simulations of Spacetime, MobyDikc, 13:01
- Re: 9-11 "Coincidences", PD, 12:58
- Re: HIV and AIDS are the result of life styles, not viruses., PD, 12:53
- Re: God creates justice, PD, 12:51
- Re: HIV and AIDS are the result of life styles, not viruses., Ian Stirling, 12:39
- Re: God creates justice, hanson, 12:34
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Randy Poe, 12:25
- Re: The IMF is a Thieving_Junky, abusing oil and Iraqis., Happy Hippy, 12:22
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, hanson, 12:05
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Androcles, 12:03
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, 1Z, 11:59
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 11:56
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Androcles, 11:50
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 11:44
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Y.Porat, 11:44
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:42
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:40
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 11:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 11:35
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Torkel Franzen, 11:30
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Y.Porat, 11:30
- Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, Traveler, 11:01
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 11:01
- Wikipedia: Feynman's Lost Lecture, Danil, 10:35
- Re: God creates justice, PD, 10:29
- Re: Process and Measurement Noise, Sam Wormley, 10:28
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., surrealistic-dream, 10:27
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, PD, 10:21
- God likes justice, kkurtstocklmeir, 10:17
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 09:53
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:48
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 09:45
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:44
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:43
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 09:41
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:40
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:39
- "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Egap, 09:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, jmfbahciv, 09:36
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:33
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, jmfbahciv, 09:32
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:24
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:23
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:22
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 09:20
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:19
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:14
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:07
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:02
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:01
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:56
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:49
- Re: Proper Frequency, PD, 08:49
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 08:47
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 08:46
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 08:37
- Re: God creates justice, heepa9, 08:18
- Re: God creates justice, heepa9, 08:12
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, jmfbahciv, 08:04
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Greg Neill, 07:28
- Re: Clayton, You've Said a Mouthful..., Steve Hayes, 07:08
- Re: Feedback in the Universe's Propositions 4: Self-Feedback, donstockbauer, 05:45
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., donstockbauer, 05:42
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 05:30
- Re: nano, donstockbauer, 05:27
- nano, desperado, 04:44
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, kumar, 04:12
- Clayton, You've Said a Mouthful..., Ed Conrad, 04:01
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Eric Gisse, 02:47
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 02:07
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Ilja Schmelzer, 01:44
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Angelo, 01:20
- Re: Feedback in the Universe's Propositions 4: Self-Feedback, OsherD, 01:03
- Re: Feedback in the Universe's Propositions 4: Self-Feedback, OsherD, 00:51
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, kumar, 00:51
- Re: Orbiting planet, Jim Black, 00:48
- Feedback in the Universe's Propositions 4: Self-Feedback, OsherD, 00:37
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Timo Nieminen, 00:23
- Re: Orbiting planet, jaska, 00:03
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:03
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
December 21, 2005
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Angelo, 23:47
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Angelo, 23:13
- Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet, donstockbauer, 23:01
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Greg Neill, 22:57
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 22:56
- Re: half-life of stable isotopes, mmeron, 22:45
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 22:41
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 22:35
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 22:18
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, donstockbauer, 22:14
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:12
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 22:05
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 21:51
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 21:49
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 21:41
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 21:30
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, kumar, 21:06
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 21:03
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Minus XVII, 20:56
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, kumar, 20:54
- Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! Here's your chance to play a physicist on TV, opposite David Duchovney & Jessica Alba!!!, Bill Hobba, 20:47
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 20:32
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, Bill Hobba, 19:34
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, daestrom, 18:24
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 18:19
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, Androcles, 18:03
- Process and Measurement Noise, Gregory L. Hansen, 17:41
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Gregory L. Hansen, 17:32
- Re: Orbiting planet, markwh04, 17:16
- Re: liquefaction chart., CWatters, 17:16
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Brad Guth, 17:15
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, markwh04, 17:10
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, tadchem, 17:10
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, markwh04, 17:09
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, markwh04, 17:07
- Re: Orbiting planet, Greg Neill, 17:03
- Re: half-life of stable isotopes, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:56
- Cosmic Landscape, glbrad01, 16:50
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, Angelo, 16:24
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Ken Muldrew, 16:05
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Traveler, 16:00
- Re: God creates justice, Richard Miller, 15:55
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 15:42
- Re: God creates justice, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:41
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 15:34
- Re: Proper Frequency, Timo Nieminen, 15:29
- Re: God creates justice, donstockbauer, 15:18
- Re: Smallest time quantum delta t?, tycho bracket, 15:17
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 224), Ken S. Tucker, 15:14
- Re: God creates justice, heepa9, 15:13
- Re: curses, Jim Black, 15:05
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 15:01
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 14:56
- Re: Orbiting planet, Jim Black, 14:54
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, mmeron, 14:40
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, Immortalist, 14:20
- Re: Gaussian charge distribution, mmeron, 14:10
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 14:03
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 14:00
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:59
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:59
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 13:58
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:57
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:55
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:53
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., glucose, 13:51
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Dirk Van de moortel, 13:51
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:51
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Richard Henry, 13:50
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, John C . Polasek, 13:44
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, Jerry Avins, 13:41
- Re: Gyral Motion, Double-A, 13:41
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:40
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Dirk Van de moortel, 13:36
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:32
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 13:31
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 13:30
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:29
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:09
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Y.Porat, 13:08
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:05
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:04
- Re: CORRUPT THEORY 'WINS' ANOTHER ROUND -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design, Bobby D. Bryant, 13:03
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:01
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 12:59
- Re: Gaussian charge distribution, mmeron, 12:56
- Re: CORRUPT THEORY 'WINS' ANOTHER ROUND -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design, Randy Poe, 12:52
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 12:50
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Richard Henry, 12:46
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., glucose, 12:46
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., glucose, 12:38
- Re: Orbiting planet, jaska, 12:38
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, PD, 12:36
- Re: Proper Frequency, srp, 12:32
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, hanson, 12:31
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 12:26
- Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, whattodo, 12:22
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Dirk Van de moortel, 12:05
- Re: Gyral Motion, Steve Ralph, 12:01
- Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Sam Wormley, 11:50
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., stephen, 11:50
- Re: Why is positive charge positive?, Sam Wormley, 11:49
- Re: Why is positive charge positive?, PD, 11:47
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:45
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, robert . w . adams, 11:42
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 11:40
- Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Gregory L. Hansen, 11:38
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:38
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 11:38
- Re: Why is positive charge positive?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:37
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 11:36
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:34
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Randy Poe, 11:33
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 11:27
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, Androcles, 11:25
- Re: Gaussian charge distribution, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:20
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, jollyrogership, 11:14
- Why is positive charge positive?, IsaacKuo, 11:11
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 11:08
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 11:04
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 11:01
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:00
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
- Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! Here's your chance to play a physicist on TV, opposite David Duchovney & Jessica Alba!!!, jollyrogership, 10:42
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:34
- Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for EPR Effect/ Wave/Particle Duality, & Constant Velocity of Light, and Unifies String Theory and General Relativity, jollyrogership, 10:34
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, Jerry Avins, 10:32
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, jollyrogership, 10:31
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Paul B. Andersen, 10:31
- Re: Gyral Motion, Don1, 10:31
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, robert . w . adams, 10:30
- Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?, sobering@xxxxxxxxx, 10:27
- Re: CORRUPT THEORY 'WINS' ANOTHER ROUND -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design, rog999, 10:25
- Re: Gyral Motion, Don1, 10:23
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 10:17
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:14
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:12
- Re: Gaussian charge distribution, John C . Polasek, 10:10
- Re: God creates justice, GarryDenke, 10:09
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 10:08
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Sam Wormley, 10:07
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, PD, 10:02
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, PD, 10:01
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 10:00
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 09:55
- Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, Garry Denke, 09:51
- Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?, PD, 09:51
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, PD, 09:48
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, John C . Polasek, 09:47
- God creates justice, kkurtstocklmeir, 09:42
- Re: Gyral Motion, Don1, 09:42
- "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Egap, 09:35
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 09:35
- Sci.Physics' _Most_Discussed_, Jeff_Relf, 09:32
- Re: CORRUPT THEORY 'WINS' ANOTHER ROUND -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design, Starlord, 09:32
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:29
- Re: Orbiting planet, PD, 09:28
- Re: Proper Frequency, PD, 09:25
- Re: Gaussian charge distribution, Andy Resnick, 09:13
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:10
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:08
- Re: Proper Frequency, PD, 09:07
- Re: NIST's Laughable Evasion..., PD, 09:05
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Traveler, 09:02
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, The Ghost In The Machine, 09:00
- Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, Rebecca Hastings, 08:46
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Paul B. Andersen, 08:29
- Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, Rebecca Hastings, 08:23
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:18
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 08:15
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:14
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:04
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:02
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 07:57
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Bilge, 07:56
- Re: time-varying dynamic system, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 07:54
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:48
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Linønut, 07:36
- Merry X-mas and a Prosperous New year in advance, Subzero1, 07:32
- Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, Greg Neill, 07:22
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, jmfbahciv, 07:16
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., donstockbauer, 07:12
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, PD, 07:07
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, jmfbahciv, 07:05
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 07:02
- Re: The IMF is a Thieving_Junky, abusing oil and Iraqis., T Wake, 06:56
- Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, Rebecca Hastings, 06:48
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 06:24
- "Call for Papers" - NanoTrends Journal, Nano, 06:22
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 06:15
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 06:11
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 06:08
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 06:01
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Bilge, 05:43
- Re: Pink and white clumpy discharge/Vaginitis, Jiozef Ruchlewicz, 05:41
- Re: Gyral Motion, Hero . van . Jindelt, 05:39
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Peter Köhlmann, 05:38
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Bilge, 05:37
- Re: Gaussian charge distribution, dkjk, 05:32
- Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:31
- time-varying dynamic system, robert . w . adams, 04:35
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Ilja Schmelzer, 04:20
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Ilja Schmelzer, 04:15
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Hero . van . Jindelt, 04:11
- Re: Gyral Motion, Steve Ralph, 03:59
- liquefaction chart., ngdbud, 03:59
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 03:55
- Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?, kumar, 03:48
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 02:52
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, hanson, 02:34
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:33
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Y.Porat, 02:23
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, hanson, 02:14
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:11
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:53
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Dave Typinski, 01:51
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:46
- Re: Gaussian charge distribution, mmeron, 01:42
- Re: half-life of stable isotopes, Sam Wormley, 01:28
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 01:25
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:05
- half-life of stable isotopes, Keith A. Schneider, 00:54
- Gaussian charge distribution, dkjk, 00:52
- Re: Pitting and surface damage in x-ray anodes, Cherry, 00:08
December 20, 2005
- Re: Lenny Susskind's important new book "Cosmic Landscape", glbrad01, 23:37
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Bret Cahill, 23:21
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Minus XVII, 23:19
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: No existence of greenhouse gases. No scientific basis for this term., kdthrge, 22:43
- Ferromagnets and superconductors make negative-index materials, Sam Wormley, 22:32
- Pitting and surface damage in x-ray anodes, trojanblue, 22:29
- Re: Gyral Motion, donstockbauer, 21:42
- Gyral Motion, Don1, 21:01
- Gyral Motion, Don1, 20:57
- Re: 9-11 "Coincidences", Happy Hippy, 20:03
- The IMF is a Thieving_Junky, abusing oil and Iraqis., Jeff_Relf, 20:00
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 19:50
- Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?, Karl Forsberg, 19:46
- Re: 9-11 "Coincidences", Hank, 19:37
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, max, 19:28
- Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, Denoco Inc., 19:27
- NIST's Laughable Evasion..., Hank, 19:19
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, daestrom, 19:10
- Re: Maxwell's equations, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:06
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 19:06
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 19:00
- The biggest joke of physics is how unphysical it is, how virtual., Jeff_Relf, 19:00
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, daestrom, 18:58
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Hero . van . Jindelt, 18:58
- Re: Maxwell's equations, Timo Nieminen, 18:53
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 18:51
- Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Peter Kinane, 18:47
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, daestrom, 18:46
- Re: 9-11 "Coincidences", T Wake, 18:36
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Steve Spence, 18:28
- Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Peter Kinane, 18:25
- 9-11 "Coincidences", Hank, 18:24
- Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, GarryDenke, 18:16
- Re: Maxwell's equations, srp, 18:03
- Re: Maximum densities, mmeron, 17:59
- Re: Proper Frequency, srp, 17:54
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, John C . Polasek, 17:51
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 17:48
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 17:43
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Tron, 17:40
- Re: Maxwell's equations, Maldona8, 17:40
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Randy, 17:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 17:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 17:38
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 17:28
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 17:25
- Re: Orbiting planet, Jim Black, 17:24
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 17:24
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Gregory L. Hansen, 17:24
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 17:23
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 17:23
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:22
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Gregory L. Hansen, 17:17
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Timo Nieminen, 17:17
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Randy Poe, 17:13
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 17:11
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 17:09
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Gregory L. Hansen, 17:06
- Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, Peace, decency, truth and friendship, 16:59
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Minus XVII, 16:51
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, tadchem, 16:50
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, tg, 16:46
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 16:44
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:43
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 16:05
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 16:02
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, briggs, 16:01
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, LongmuirG, 15:59
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 15:57
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, PD, 15:54
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, PD, 15:48
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 15:34
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 15:31
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 15:30
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 15:28
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 15:26
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 15:23
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 15:23
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Randy Poe, 15:18
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, jesper pedersen, 15:11
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 15:10
- Re: spr post about connection by kst, Ken S. Tucker, 15:10
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 15:07
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 15:06
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 15:04
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 15:02
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 15:01
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 15:00
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, chuckles, 14:55
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, PD, 14:50
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 14:50
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 14:49
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 14:47
- Re: Proper Frequency, Timo Nieminen, 14:46
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 14:39
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, jesper pedersen, 14:28
- Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, Androcles, 14:27
- Proper Frequency, MobyDikc, 14:26
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 14:19
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 14:19
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 224), Androcles, 14:17
- Re: Orbiting planet, Greg Neill, 14:15
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Androcles, 14:15
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Androcles, 14:15
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 14:14
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, PD, 13:58
- Re: Lorentzian accurate? (Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate...), Bilge, 13:52
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 13:51
- Re: Orbiting planet, jaska, 13:48
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 13:43
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 13:43
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 13:42
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 13:27
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 13:25
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Androcles, 13:16
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Androcles, 13:16
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 13:15
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 13:06
- Re: Maximum densities, mmeron, 13:02
- Re: Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 3: Internal vs External Knowledge, donstockbauer, 13:01
- Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 3: Internal vs External Knowledge, OsherD, 12:37
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Brad Guth, 12:35
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:27
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:23
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 12:17
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:10
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:06
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, briggs, 12:05
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, briggs, 12:03
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:02
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 11:55
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 11:52
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Traveler, 11:33
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Brad Guth, 11:25
- Re: Gravitational Radiation, Sam Wormley, 11:20
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Sev, 11:12
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Joe Fischer, 11:08
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 11:07
- Re: Energy Conversion To Mass, Sam Wormley, 11:00
- Re: Maximum densities, PD, 10:55
- Re: Energy Conversion To Mass, Happy Hippy, 10:53
- Re: Gravitational Radiation, Happy Hippy, 10:51
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Steve Spence, 10:42
- Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, DenocoInc, 10:36
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 10:33
- Re: A crash course in sentience and Multiscale_Physics., Robert M. Stockmann, 10:32
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 10:32
- Re: curses are good, PD, 10:28
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Han de Bruijn, 10:26
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 10:24
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, PD, 10:20
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 10:12
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Traveler, 10:09
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Joe Fischer, 10:08
- Re: curses, PD, 10:00
- Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, Garry Denke, 09:49
- Re: Transparency?, PD, 09:46
- Re: curses are good, T Wake, 09:44
- "The Flaw in High Energy Physics", Egap, 09:43
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, John C . Polasek, 09:42
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:40
- good, kkurtstocklmeir, 09:38
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 09:37
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 09:36
- faqy is cursed, kkurtstocklmeir, 09:35
- curses are good, kkurtstocklmeir, 09:29
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 09:27
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 09:20
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 09:11
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 09:10
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 09:09
- Re: Please Help, PD, 09:08
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 09:07
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 09:05
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Joe Fischer, 09:05
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 09:04
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 09:02
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Harry, 09:02
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:00
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 08:45
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 08:40
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, briggs, 08:23
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, brian a m stuckless, 08:22
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 08:18
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 08:15
- Re: Orbiting planet, Greg Neill, 08:13
- Re: Maximum densities, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 08:11
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, briggs, 08:07
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Han de Bruijn, 07:46
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 07:46
- Re: Maximum densities, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:46
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, jmfbahciv, 07:46
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:26
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Hans Lohninger, 07:21
- Re: No existence of greenhouse gases. No scientific basis for this term., Bruce Scott TOK, 07:18
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Ilja Schmelzer, 07:14
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 06:22
- Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, Androcles, 06:08
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, max, 06:07
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Androcles, 06:02
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, tadchem, 05:56
- No existence of greenhouse gases. No scientific basis for this term., kdthrge, 05:52
- Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory, Ian Parker, 05:35
- Re: Energy Conversion To Mass, glbrad01, 05:32
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 05:31
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., denis feldmann, 05:25
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 05:24
- Re: Maximum densities, mmeron, 05:14
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, nightbat, 04:50
- Re: Briefcase Nuke at the WTCs?, donstockbauer, 04:33
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Han de Bruijn, 04:31
- Re: Maximum densities, tadchem, 04:17
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 04:08
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Double-A, 03:58
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:51
- Re: Roberts, Name one error., Peter Köhlmann, 03:43
- Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?, Y.Porat, 03:40
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:36
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 03:34
- Roberts, Name one error., Jeff_Relf, 03:32
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 03:13
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Ilja Schmelzer, 03:12
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Ilja Schmelzer, 03:05
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:57
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 02:46
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:42
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:31
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:24
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Brad Guth, 02:21
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 02:13
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 01:57
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Randy Poe, 01:03
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, The Real Bev, 01:03
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 00:54
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 00:53
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Logan Shaw, 00:48
- Re: A crash course in sentience and Multiscale_Physics., Tom Roberts, 00:30
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Terry, 00:20
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 00:16
December 19, 2005
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:56
- Re: Orbiting planet, Jim Black, 23:52
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 23:50
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Sam Wormley, 23:48
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 23:42
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 23:41
- Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 23:35
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Al Zenner, 23:33
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:33
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 23:29
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 23:16
- Hear Cynthia Sue Larson Now -"Understanding Reality Shifts" On The Isle Of Light Internet Radio Show, cap22322, 22:59
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 22:39
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 22:35
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 22:32
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 22:25
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Steve Spence, 22:21
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Steve Spence, 22:18
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 22:16
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 22:15
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 22:14
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 22:08
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 22:07
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, tdp1001, 22:02
- Re: Orbiting planet, jaska, 22:01
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 21:51
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Al Zenner, 21:43
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 20:48
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:16
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 20:16
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 20:11
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 20:10
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 20:08
- Re: Orbiting planet, Jim Black, 19:58
- Smallest time quantum delta t?, Ioannis, 19:51
- Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 2: Feedback Explains Acceleration of Universe, OsherD, 19:50
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 19:47
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Androcles, 19:44
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Androcles, 19:40
- Re: Replacing helium on earth, Richard Henry, 19:23
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Logan Shaw, 19:07
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 19:04
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 19:00
- Replacing helium on earth, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:47
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:39
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:33
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 18:31
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Alex Terrell, 18:14
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Timo Nieminen, 18:02
- The IMF abuses oil and the Middle_East like a Thieving_Junkie., Jeff_Relf, 17:53
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Logan Shaw, 17:52
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 17:43
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Jeff_Relf, 17:41
- Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:41
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Randy Poe, 17:30
- Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel, Mike, 17:27
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:23
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 17:22
- spr post about connection by kst, Ken S. Tucker, 17:15
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 17:13
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:12
- Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, Mike, 17:10
- Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, rak, 17:06
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:05
- Re: A crash course in spamming and spewing by an idiot, 7, 17:05
- Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail, franklinhu, 17:04
- Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, rak, 17:04
- Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, rak, 17:03
- Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, rak, 17:03
- Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, rak, 17:02
- Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:02
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 17:02
- Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:55
- Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel, Mike, 16:52
- The SI second is more virtual than real., Jeff_Relf, 16:51
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 16:43
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 16:40
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 16:36
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, Eric Gisse, 16:35
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, carlip-nospam, 16:23
- Re: Gravitational Radiation, mike3, 16:21
- If only _I_ were as ignorant as that., Jeff_Relf, 16:08
- Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, rak, 16:05
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, donstockbauer, 15:53
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 15:50
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, franklinhu, 15:48
- Re: Transparency?, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:42
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, tg, 15:40
- Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory, Timo Nieminen, 15:38
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, what does THIS button do?, 15:32
- Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth ?, Jeff_Relf, 15:30
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 15:24
- Studpidity made no one free., Jeff_Relf, 15:18
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, what does THIS button do?, 15:17
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, briggs, 15:13
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Bret Cahill, 15:10
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Richard Miller, 15:09
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:06
- A crash course in sentience and Multiscale_Physics., Jeff_Relf, 15:04
- Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel, Richard Henry, 15:03
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 15:01
- Re: Energy Conversion To Mass, PD, 15:01
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 14:57
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 14:50
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, MobyDikc, 14:48
- Re: Please Help, Herman Trivilino, 14:47
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 14:40
- Re: Transparency?, Andy Resnick, 14:37
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 14:35
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Richard Miller, 14:35
- Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, GarryDenke, 14:30
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 14:28
- Re: salt melt ice, Andy Resnick, 14:27
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Abby Normal, 14:03
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, John Baez, 14:02
- Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:58
- Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?, shanshicn, 13:52
- Re: 911 CONSPIRACY: A Summary <----------, whatsittoya, 13:48
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Androcles, 13:46
- The bending of space-time by zero point energy, Jack Sarfatti, 13:43
- Re: 911 CONSPIRACY: A Summary <----------, Johnny, 13:41
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:37
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, Androcles, 13:33
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Randy Poe, 13:32
- Re: Please Help, Randy Poe, 13:30
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, wolf, 13:23
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:14
- 911 CONSPIRACY: A Summary <----------, Ed Conrad, 13:10
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 13:05
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 12:55
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:54
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Sam Wormley, 12:51
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 12:50
- Re: Gravitational Radiation, Sam Wormley, 12:49
- Re: Please Help, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:47
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 12:35
- Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory, Sam Wormley, 12:33
- Re: Energy Conversion To Mass, Sam Wormley, 12:32
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, kvark, 12:30
- Lenny Susskind's important new book "Cosmic Landscape", Jack Sarfatti, 12:30
- Re: Gravitational Radiation, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:29
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, kvark, 12:25
- Re: Gravitational Radiation, Happy Hippy, 12:22
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:21
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, franklinhu, 12:17
- Re: Energy Conversion To Mass, Happy Hippy, 12:12
- Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory, kvark, 12:12
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., wolf, 12:12
- GRAVITATION EXPLAINED, ACE, 12:10
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 11:58
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, briggs, 11:49
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:48
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 11:43
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 11:42
- Re: Orbiting planet, Sam Wormley, 11:36
- Re: Orbiting planet, Sam Wormley, 11:32
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, brian a m stuckless, 11:28
- Re: Orbiting planet, jaska, 11:21
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 11:18
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, PD, 11:17
- Re: Energy Conversion To Mass, PD, 11:10
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, rick++, 11:09
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 11:04
- Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?, PD, 11:03
- Re: Evidence for phonons, Rene Tschaggelar, 11:02
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., wolf, 10:52
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 10:47
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 10:39
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 10:36
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 10:34
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:23
- "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity", Egap, 10:21
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, hanson, 10:14
- Re: Maxwell's equations, Mark Fergerson, 10:07
- Re: Evidence for phonons, Sam Wormley, 10:02
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Steve Spence, 09:58
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:54
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, briggs, 09:50
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, PD, 09:46
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:40
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 09:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:34
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., wolf, 09:34
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:32
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:24
- Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?, Andy Resnick, 09:20
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 09:18
- Evidence for phonons, Josef Matz, 09:12
- Re: Evidence for phonons, donstockbauer, 09:09
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:08
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 09:06
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, tdp1001, 09:02
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 08:56
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Paul B. Andersen, 08:46
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 08:25
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Bret Cahill, 08:13
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, AllYou!, 08:09
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, AllYou!, 08:08
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, AllYou!, 08:08
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., wolf, 08:03
- Re: Why posters like Autymn D.C. are... no, I won't go there... ;), 616, 07:54
- Energy Conversion To Mass, glbrad01, 07:21
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Jan Panteltje, 07:17
- Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory, Jan Panteltje, 07:08
- Re: Lenny Susskind meet the ET Alien Visitors ;-), Dr Nanduri, 07:00
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Hero . van . Jindelt, 06:59
- Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory, Ian Parker, 06:52
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 06:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 06:31
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Jan Panteltje, 06:22
- Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory, kvark, 06:09
- Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory, kvark, 06:06
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Publius, 06:05
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 05:45
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 19, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:41
- Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory, Ian Parker, 05:38
- Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory, Timo Nieminen, 05:13
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Harry, 04:23
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 04:00
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 03:53
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 03:53
- Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, The Flying Dutchman, 03:35
- Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory, kvark, 03:26
- Re: Feedback In The Universe's Propositions, OsherD, 03:16
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 03:16
- Re: Feedback In The Universe's Propositions, OsherD, 03:02
- Re: How can I build a quantum switch?, The Flying Dutchman, 02:53
- Re: Gravity NEUTRALIZING Air / Spacecraft, or ZERO / REDUCED- Gravity Chamber, nightbat, 02:39
- Re: Please Help, Helmut Wabnig, 02:33
- Re: How can I build a quantum switch?, The Flying Dutchman, 02:29
- Re: Transparency?, Jim Black, 02:27
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 02:25
- Re: Feedback In The Universe's Propositions, OsherD, 02:24
- Feedback In The Universe's Propositions, OsherD, 02:01
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 01:56
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 01:50
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 01:44
- Re: The Universe Can Assert Propositions Which Create Physical Laws, OsherD, 01:37
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, FrediFizzx, 01:31
- Re: Transparency?, Sam Wormley, 01:28
- Lenny Susskind meet the ET Alien Visitors ;-), Jack Sarfatti, 01:11
- Re: Orbiting planet, Jim Black, 00:59
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, ~^Johnny^~, 00:48
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, William Souden, 00:46
- Re: How can I build a quantum switch?, The Flying Dutchman, 00:42
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 00:37
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 00:37
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 00:37
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 00:37
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 00:31
- Transparency?, Brablo, 00:29
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Abby Normal, 00:24
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 00:15
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, donstockbauer, 00:15
- Re: The Universe Can Assert Propositions Which Create Physical Laws, donstockbauer, 00:13
- Re: How can I build a quantum switch?, donstockbauer, 00:06
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 00:05
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 00:04
December 18, 2005
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 23:28
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bob Cain, 23:24
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:14
- The Universe Can Assert Propositions Which Create Physical Laws, OsherD, 22:52
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 22:36
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 22:32
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 22:27
- Re: Gravitational Radiation, Sam Wormley, 22:21
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, max, 22:17
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Bret Cahill, 22:04
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Logan Shaw, 21:57
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Al Zenner, 21:30
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 21:29
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 21:23
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 21:15
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 21:14
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 21:12
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 21:09
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 21:01
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, websurf1, 20:56
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, websurf1, 20:54
- Re: Gravitational Radiation, mike3, 20:54
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 20:50
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 20:38
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 20:30
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, donstockbauer, 20:20
- Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:14
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, xeno, 19:54
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 19:52
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 19:52
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Autymn D. C., 19:41
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 19:26
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Sam Wormley, 19:26
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 19:23
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 19:22
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 19:21
- Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel, Sam Wormley, 19:20
- Re: Gravitational Radiation, Sam Wormley, 19:19
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 19:19
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:17
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:11
- Re: Reconstruction of Mass/Radiation: Mass/Radiation as Knowledge, OsherD, 19:07
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:01
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, CJT, 19:01
- Gravitational Radiation, mike3, 18:57
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, CJT, 18:57
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, CJT, 18:54
- Re: Reconstruction of Mass/Radiation: Mass/Radiation as Knowledge, OsherD, 18:47
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, CJT, 18:46
- Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail, John Baez, 18:46
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places, John Baez, 18:40
- Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel, F. Art Ingatu, 18:39
- Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel, F. Art Ingatu, 18:39
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Sam Wormley, 18:37
- Reconstruction of Mass/Radiation: Mass/Radiation as Knowledge, OsherD, 18:32
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, mmeron, 18:22
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, chuckles, 18:08
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Timo Nieminen, 18:06
- Re: Lorentzian accurate? (Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate...), Autymn D. C., 17:52
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 17:52
- Re: Lightning kills 11 in church, hanson, 17:43
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 17:41
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 17:24
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, platopes, 17:17
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 16:59
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 16:59
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, brian a m stuckless, 16:50
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, mmeron, 16:49
- Re: Orbiting planet, Greg Neill, 16:42
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Logan Shaw, 16:39
- The Universe Should At Largest and Smallest Scales...., glbrad01, 16:34
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Logan Shaw, 16:32
- Re: Orbiting planet, donstockbauer, 16:31
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Logan Shaw, 16:27
- Re: Orbiting planet, Sam Wormley, 16:23
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 16:22
- Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, donstockbauer, 16:19
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 16:17
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 16:16
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 16:14
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 16:14
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 16:13
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 16:11
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 16:08
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 16:06
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 16:06
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:04
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Logan Shaw, 16:01
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Logan Shaw, 15:58
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 15:57
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Logan Shaw, 15:56
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Mike, 15:46
- Re: logical glitsch, glbrad01, 15:40
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Logan Shaw, 15:33
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 15:23
- DE NATURA VISIBILIUM ET INVISIBILIUM, R.Aparicio, 15:15
- Orbiting planet, jaska, 15:11
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 15:00
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, FrediFizzx, 14:50
- Re: IF Pseudos' Noses Would Glow ... <-------, Immortalist, 14:49
- Re: Maxwell's equations, Androcles, 14:44
- Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome, rak, 14:35
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, SMS, 14:31
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Timo Nieminen, 14:28
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, The Real Bev, 14:16
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Jan Panteltje, 14:16
- Re: IF Pseudos' Noses Would Glow ... <-------, Brian Fletcher, 14:10
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Jan Panteltje, 14:03
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Sam Wormley, 13:57
- Please Help, pierceb, 13:45
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 13:43
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, chuckles, 13:38
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Al Zenner, 13:23
- Re: We don't know anything, Androcles, 13:11
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Lightning kills 11 in church, Jan Panteltje, 12:54
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 12:43
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 12:40
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Sam Wormley, 12:40
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 12:38
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, max, 12:37
- Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities", donstockbauer, 12:31
- Re: IF Pseudos' Noses Would Glow ... <-------, Bret Cahill, 12:30
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 12:30
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 12:29
- Re: We don't know anything, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:22
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Al Zenner, 12:16
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 12:15
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Al Zenner, 12:15
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 12:15
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Al Zenner, 12:12
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Al Zenner, 12:09
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 12:08
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 12:06
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, x600y, 12:05
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Al Zenner, 12:04
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, x600y, 12:03
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, x600y, 12:02
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, x600y, 11:59
- Re: We don't know anything, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 11:59
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:56
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, x600y, 11:55
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 11:53
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, x600y, 11:52
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 11:40
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, max, 11:37
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:36
- Re: Maxwell's equations, Matthew Lybanon, 11:34
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Bret Cahill, 11:25
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, max, 11:24
- Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?, Y.Porat, 11:22
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, ipcress, 11:18
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Y.Porat, 11:15
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Y.Porat, 11:11
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 11:01
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, ipcress, 10:58
- Re: IF Pseudos' Noses Would Glow ... <-------, Geoff, 10:54
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Bret Cahill, 10:46
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 10:45
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 10:41
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 10:26
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 10:21
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 10:21
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 10:19
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 10:18
- Re: We don't know anything, Androcles, 10:10
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 10:04
- What's better place than here? What's better time than now?, dedanoe, 10:02
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:55
- "Communicating at Translight Velocities", Ytrap, 09:50
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 09:44
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, hanson, 09:41
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 09:18
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 08:58
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Jan Panteltje, 08:10
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, jmfbahciv, 08:05
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, jmfbahciv, 08:04
- Maxwell's equations, Maldona8, 07:57
- Re: We don't know anything, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 07:54
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, donstockbauer, 07:49
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Paul E. Bennett, 07:36
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Jan Panteltje, 07:32
- Re: New type of minimal surface based on a double helix, Hero . van . Jindelt, 07:20
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Jan Panteltje, 07:18
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 07:02
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Shawn Hirn, 06:54
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Ian Parker, 06:49
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Androcles, 06:25
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Androcles, 06:22
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Androcles, 06:21
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:14
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Androcles, 05:00
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:59
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, brian a m stuckless, 04:58
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 04:58
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:56
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:53
- Re: Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _Most_Discussed_, John Bailo, 04:04
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Y.Porat, 04:02
- Re: Call for Papers: CSC'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06), brian a m stuckless, 04:00
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 03:55
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 03:52
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 03:50
- Re: Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation 4: Critique of Causal Dynamical Triangulations Theory, OsherD, 03:37
- Re: Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation 4: Critique of Causal Dynamical Triangulations Theory, OsherD, 03:23
- Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation 4: Critique of Causal Dynamical Triangulations Theory, OsherD, 03:03
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Y.Porat, 03:00
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 02:50
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 02:39
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, FrediFizzx, 02:37
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, CJT, 02:16
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Gene S . Berkowitz, 02:12
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 02:01
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 01:51
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 01:31
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 01:30
- Re: = More water dumped on the "magic fires" =, Ozark, 01:26
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, catalpa, 01:20
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, CJT, 01:14
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, catalpa, 01:09
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 00:58
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 00:56
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Dan Bloomquist, 00:55
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 00:54
- Re: We don't know anything, Bilge, 00:37
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, max, 00:35
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Bob Ward, 00:27
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, max, 00:27
- Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _Most_Discussed_, Jeff_Relf, 00:12
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bilge, 00:07
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, bsr3997, 00:02
December 17, 2005
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Al Zenner, 23:57
- Re: Liquid water is just a density, a place in Space_Time_Entropy., donstockbauer, 23:56
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 23:54
- Re: deuterium separation, Earle Jones, 23:50
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Sam Wormley, 23:30
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:30
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 23:28
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Sam Wormley, 23:18
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, catalpa, 23:15
- Re: God and curses, donstockbauer, 23:13
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, catalpa, 23:08
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, catalpa, 23:06
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 22:50
- Re: God and curses, donstockbauer, 22:48
- Re: finding acceleration when given certain variables..., John C . Polasek, 22:30
- Re: God and curses, donstockbauer, 22:23
- Re: salt melt ice, donstockbauer, 22:15
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, chuckles, 22:13
- Re: Circumhorizon arc, donstockbauer, 22:13
- Re: salt melt ice, Sam Wormley, 22:11
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, Sam Wormley, 22:09
- Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?, donstockbauer, 22:04
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, mmeron, 21:51
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 21:50
- How does light travel through a vacuum?, chuckles, 21:44
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Timo Nieminen, 21:43
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., giovanni, 21:13
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Tom Roberts, 21:01
- Re: salt melt ice, John Popelish, 20:55
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Tom Roberts, 20:53
- Re: Take_therefore_no_thought_for_the_morrow., 7, 20:43
- Re: IF Pseudos' Noses Would Glow ... <-------, edconrad, 20:14
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 20:12
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 20:02
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 20:00
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Timo Nieminen, 19:53
- Re: IF Pseudos' Noses Would Glow ... <-------, Brian Fletcher, 19:49
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 19:38
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bill Hobba, 19:35
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 19:32
- Call for Papers: CSC'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06), A. M. G. Solo, 19:23
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:21
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 19:19
- Circumhorizon arc, Sam Wormley, 19:18
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, mmeron, 19:12
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:11
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, mmeron, 19:11
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:06
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:00
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Craig Franck, 18:55
- Cosmological Quantum Units and Planck's Units, Louis_N, 18:49
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Stuart, 18:43
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Duane C. Johnson, 18:41
- Re: On absolute units, Louis_N, 18:40
- Re: finding acceleration when given certain variables..., Timo Nieminen, 18:36
- finding acceleration when given certain variables..., lancelotti13, 18:21
- Re: God and curses, Daniel Jackson, 18:02
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 17:59
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, donstockbauer, 17:50
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bilge, 17:44
- Re: We don't know anything, surrealistic-dream, 17:37
- Re: We don't know anything, Androcles, 17:31
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 17:26
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 17:25
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 17:24
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, CJT, 17:23
- Re: God and curses, Jim Black, 17:21
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 17:17
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 17:09
- Take_therefore_no_thought_for_the_morrow., Jeff_Relf, 17:06
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 17:03
- Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation 3: "Reborn Physics", OsherD, 16:59
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, CWatters, 16:56
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 16:24
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Anthony Matonak, 16:17
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 16:07
- Re: Who'd truly own your android self ? Society ? The world ?, Charles, 16:05
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 16:01
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Timo Nieminen, 16:01
- Re: Rudiment of Effectuationism Grand Unification Theory, Peter Kinane, 15:49
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 15:46
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 15:42
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Logan Shaw, 15:33
- Re: Classical mechanics as if QM, Timo Nieminen, 15:28
- Re: Randomness is a byproduct of unknowns, nothing more., 7, 15:18
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 15:03
- The CMBR: ILC_b.JPG, Jeff_Relf, 15:02
- Classical mechanics as if QM, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:53
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Gene S . Berkowitz, 14:49
- Randomness is a byproduct of unknowns, nothing more., Jeff_Relf, 14:47
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Herman Trivilino, 14:39
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 14:28
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Thomas Heger, 14:27
- Re: Lightning And Grounding Questions, John C . Polasek, 14:19
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:10
- Merry Newtonmas, Michael E.Marotta, 14:07
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, tg, 14:06
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 14:01
- A virtually infinitely long yard stick., Jeff_Relf, 13:56
- Re: Lightning And Grounding Questions, jimp, 13:55
- Re: Hole in Earth, arvee, 13:54
- Re: We don't know anything, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 13:44
- General_Relativity is insignificant at accelerations much below infinite., Jeff_Relf, 13:34
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Madwia, 13:34
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:34
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:33
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Immortalist, 13:33
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:28
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 13:22
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:20
- Re: IF Pseudos' Noses Would Glow ... <-------, Immortalist, 13:19
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 13:18
- how atoms are arranged on a surface?, shanshicn, 13:15
- Re: Who'd truly own your android self ? Society ? The world ?, donstockbauer, 13:14
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Bob Eldred, 13:14
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 13:14
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Rod Speed, 13:09
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 13:06
- Who'd truly own your android self ? Society ? The world ?, Jeff_Relf, 13:04
- Re: Rudiment of Effectuationism Grand Unification Theory, Joe Fischer, 13:00
- Re: My God is a thing, not a man., John Bailo, 12:55
- Re: You're the match, and God struck you., John Bailo, 12:53
- My God is a thing, not a man., Jeff_Relf, 12:52
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Alex Terrell, 12:40
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Y.Porat, 12:31
- You're the match, and God struck you., Jeff_Relf, 12:18
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Nog, 12:17
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, donstockbauer, 12:10
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, ChairMan, 12:02
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:57
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:45
- Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?, Steven Gray, 11:45
- Re: New type of minimal surface based on a double helix, whattodo, 11:44
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:43
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Don K, 11:42
- Re: Hole in Earth, Steven Gray, 11:42
- Re: Lightning And Grounding Questions, Helmut Wabnig, 11:36
- Re: Circular orbit, Steven Gray, 11:32
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 11:30
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 11:29
- Re: Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation 2: Electromagnetics Are Not Causal, OsherD, 11:28
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 11:23
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 11:22
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 11:20
- Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation 2: Electromagnetics Are Not Causal, OsherD, 11:10
- "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Ytrap, 10:54
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 10:51
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Shaun Eli, 10:47
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Jan Panteltje, 10:42
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 10:40
- Re: Lightning And Grounding Questions, Jan Panteltje, 10:40
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 10:32
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, George, 10:30
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Richard Henry, 10:30
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, George, 10:26
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:25
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 10:25
- Re: = More water dumped on the "magic fires" =, neadles, 10:23
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, tg, 10:23
- Re: Lightning And Grounding Questions, Sam Wormley, 10:18
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 10:16
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Sam Wormley, 10:14
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 10:11
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Don K, 10:07
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 10:04
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Richard Henry, 09:57
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bob, 09:54
- Re: Lightning And Grounding Questions, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 09:47
- Re: Most efficient way to boil water?, Steve Spence, 09:47
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 09:42
- Most efficient way to boil water?, x600y, 09:35
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 09:28
- Lightning And Grounding Questions, Robert11, 09:24
- Deck Those Hallowed Halls of Learnin' ...., Ed Conrad, 09:11
- Re: Rudiment of Effectuationism Grand Unification Theory, pkinane, 09:06
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 08:52
- Some Holes In Temperature, Density, Big Bang Infinity Premise, glbrad01, 08:27
- Re: Rudiment of Effectuationism Grand Unification Theory, Joe Fischer, 08:23
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Al Zenner, 08:03
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, jesper pedersen, 08:00
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Eric Gisse, 07:58
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., jesper pedersen, 07:51
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 07:29
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 07:21
- Re: Cyber world, donstockbauer, 07:15
- Re: Cyber world, donstockbauer, 07:13
- Re: Rudiment of Effectuationism Grand Unification Theory, Joe Fischer, 07:10
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, donstockbauer, 07:05
- Re: Rudiment of Effectuationism Grand Unification Theory, Peter Kinane, 07:00
- Re: Rudiment of Effectuationism Grand Unification Theory, donstockbauer, 06:49
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, tg, 06:48
- Rudiment of Effectuationism Grand Unification Theory, Peter Kinane, 06:42
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Mike, 06:09
- Re: dedanoe's paradox, dedanoe, 05:50
- Cyber world, pl . moyne, 05:43
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Jonathan Silverlight, 05:14
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:13
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Bill Hobba, 05:09
- tell me about group velocity, narasimha_murthy_h@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:06
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 04:08
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, mmeron, 04:07
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 03:50
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 03:42
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 03:39
- God and curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 03:29
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 03:14
- Re: Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation, OsherD, 03:01
- Re: Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation, OsherD, 02:26
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 02:18
- Re: Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation, OsherD, 02:06
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, franklinhu, 01:46
- Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation, OsherD, 01:42
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 01:28
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 01:02
- New type of minimal surface based on a double helix, Sam Wormley, 00:40
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Androcles, 00:36
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 00:31
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 00:29
- Re: Maximum densities, mmeron, 00:27
December 16, 2005
- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 16 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 23:12
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:00
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 22:56
- Re: The location of invisible "dark matter" [has been mapped] in unprecedented detail, FrediFizzx, 22:49
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., donstockbauer, 22:42
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 22:38
- The location of invisible "dark matter" [has been mapped] in unprecedented detail, Sam Wormley, 22:18
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, George, 22:18
- Re: Maximum densities, tadchem, 21:47
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 20:48
- Re: what the freak is this super gravity shit?, donstockbauer, 20:28
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Jonathan Silverlight, 20:14
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 19:54
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., catlover, 19:52
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., catlover, 19:52
- what the freak is this super gravity shit?, Shanu, 19:52
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Jonathan Silverlight, 19:40
- Re: Maximum densities, Autymn D. C., 19:37
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 19:36
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Carsten Troelsgaard, 19:31
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Stuart, 19:27
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 19:06
- Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet, tj Frazir, 18:56
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Happy Dog, 18:46
- = More water dumped on the "magic fires" =, Hank, 18:06
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 17:57
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Al Zenner, 17:31
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Androcles, 17:07
- Re: Maximum densities, mmeron, 16:56
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 16:37
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 16 Dec 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 16:28
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Androcles, 16:22
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, JanPB, 16:17
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 224), Ken S. Tucker, 16:16
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 16:12
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, JanPB, 16:07
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 16:01
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 15:59
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 15:49
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 15:47
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Richard Miller, 15:31
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Androcles, 15:06
- Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Robert J. Kolker, 15:04
- Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe, Traveler, 15:00
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, george, 14:46
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 14:41
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 14:38
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Happy Dog, 14:29
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Joe Fischer, 14:21
- Re: dedanoe's paradox, Mike, 14:20
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Jon Bell, 14:04
- dedanoe's paradox, dedanoe, 14:01
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 13:41
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 13:05
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 13:01
- Re: Maximum densities, tadchem, 12:46
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:40
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:36
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 12:35
- Re: Push gravity, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:34
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:32
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:29
- Re: Electromagnetic Origin of Mass, Happy Hippy, 12:26
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, MobyDikc, 12:25
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:10
- Re: We don't know anything, Y.Porat, 12:08
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 12:08
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 12:01
- "General Relativity Examined", Ytrap, 11:53
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 11:49
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Traveler, 11:31
- Re: The *War* on Christmas! `~, tj Frazir, 11:26
- Post to spr re "connections", Ken S. Tucker, 11:01
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Jonathan Silverlight, 10:38
- Re: Circulation?, Andy Resnick, 10:08
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 10:06
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 09:56
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., donstockbauer, 09:55
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 09:48
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Mike, 09:44
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Mike, 09:34
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:24
- Re: Move Over, Atheists!, Helmut Wabnig, 09:23
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 09:04
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, George, 08:57
- Re: Move Over, Atheists!, François Guillet, 08:56
- On absolute units, Matej Pavsic, 08:48
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 08:15
- Re: Maximum densities, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:10
- Re: Circulation?, nimcha, 07:50
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Jan Panteltje, 06:49
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 06:35
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 06:32
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 06:31
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 06:26
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 06:22
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 06:20
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 06:15
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 06:14
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Stuart, 06:00
- Re: Move Over, Atheists!, glbrad01, 05:58
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., glbrad01, 05:28
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Michael Gray, 05:11
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:11
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:06
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:48
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:40
- Re: We don't know anything, Androcles, 04:07
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Ian Parker, 03:53
- curses, kkurtstocklmeir, 03:32
- Re: Leonard Susskind Climbs Mount Olympus, OsherD, 02:56
- Re: Push gravity, Y.Porat, 02:42
- Re: Triggering Solar Mayhem, OsherD, 02:41
- Re: Physics of Terror Feedback: Worship of vs Violent Hatred of Sex, OsherD, 02:30
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, franklinhu, 02:22
- Re: Physics of Terror Feedback: Worship of vs Violent Hatred of Sex, OsherD, 02:16
- Re: Push gravity, Jim Black, 02:01
- Re: Physics of Terror Feedback: Worship of vs Violent Hatred of Sex, OsherD, 01:58
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 01:58
- Re: Physics of Terror Feedback: Worship of vs Violent Hatred of Sex, OsherD, 01:47
- Triggering Solar Mayhem, Sam Wormley, 01:44
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 01:37
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 01:32
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 01:31
- Physics of Terror Feedback: Worship of vs Violent Hatred of Sex, OsherD, 01:30
- Leonard Susskind Climbs Mount Olympus, Jack Sarfatti, 01:20
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, JanPB, 01:05
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 00:08
- Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation" 2: Probable Correlation, OsherD, 00:02
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, donstockbauer, 00:01
December 15, 2005
- Re: We don't know anything, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:55
- Re: PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH.!!!!!!!!!, donstockbauer, 23:22
- Re: We don't know anything, donstockbauer, 23:17
- Two Faces of Negative ZPF Pressure: Casimir Attraction & Gravity Repulsion, Jack Sarfatti, 23:12
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", donstockbauer, 23:06
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, jimp, 23:05
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:53
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 22:28
- Re: We don't know anything, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 22:28
- UNDERSTAND YOUR OWN BRAIN ... INFOMERCIAL TECHNOLOGY BREAKTHROUGHS PREDICTED ..., maestro, 22:28
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 22:23
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, AJW, 22:21
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, AJW, 22:21
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 22:03
- Re: believe in quantum pi, tadchem, 21:55
- Relationships between the Bohr model and the fine structure constant., Golden Boar, 21:50
- Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation", OsherD, 21:50
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Happy Dog, 21:42
- Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation", OsherD, 21:41
- Re: Maximum densities, tadchem, 21:40
- Re: PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH.!!!!!!!!!, Glenn \(Christian Mystic\), 21:35
- Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation", OsherD, 21:32
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, AJW, 21:32
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Traveler, 21:05
- Re: We don't know anything, whisper555, 21:05
- Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation", OsherD, 20:55
- Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation", OsherD, 20:28
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 20:24
- Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation", OsherD, 20:05
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?", Sam Wormley, 19:57
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Sam Wormley, 19:56
- Re: Quantum Pi, Sam Wormley, 19:52
- Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation", OsherD, 19:52
- Re: believe in quantum pi, Sam Wormley, 19:52
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 19:49
- Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation", OsherD, 19:40
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 19:33
- Re: Push gravity, Aetherist, 19:26
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, platopes, 19:15
- Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation", OsherD, 19:12
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Eric Gisse, 19:01
- Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation", OsherD, 18:57
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Autymn D. C., 18:57
- Re: Push gravity, Eric Gisse, 18:52
- Re: Maximum densities, Robert Israel, 18:50
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 18:36
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, MobyDikc, 18:27
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 18:21
- Re: Maximum densities, mmeron, 18:17
- Re: Feynman Lectures....Question re 2005 Revised Ed., Dirk Van de moortel, 18:11
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:01
- Re: Maximum densities, tadchem, 17:45
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, platopes, 17:40
- Re: Maximum densities, tadchem, 17:32
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Spindler of Kittens, 17:26
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Spindler of Kittens, 17:24
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 17:01
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 16:55
- Re: Quantum Pi, donstockbauer, 16:50
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:31
- Re: Magic Numbers, PD, 16:29
- Re: Push gravity, CWatters, 16:18
- Re: Quantum Pi, Meker John, 16:07
- Re: Quantum Pi, Meker John, 16:04
- Re: believe in quantum pi, Meker John, 16:03
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 16:02
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 16:02
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, Traveler, 15:59
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:57
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:56
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, MobyDikc, 15:52
- Re: believe in quantum pi, Puppet_Sock, 15:51
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 15:51
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, MobyDikc, 15:48
- Re: Feynman Lectures....Question re 2005 Revised Ed., Puppet_Sock, 15:48
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:46
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 15:42
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, Traveler, 15:42
- Re: We don't know anything, Traveler, 15:33
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:32
- Re: Magic Numbers, John Christiansen, 15:30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:26
- Re: Dear U.S. citizens... Consume more petroleum, and you'll die sooner., John A. Bailo, 15:20
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 15:19
- Feynman Lectures....Question re 2005 Revised Ed., junjunius, 15:15
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, MobyDikc, 15:02
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Mike, 14:47
- Re: Quantum Pi, magicvsmagick, 14:45
- Geophysics EM, h . molhem, 14:40
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, MobyDikc, 14:39
- Re: Magic Numbers, onehappymadman, 14:37
- believe in quantum pi, magicvsmagick, 14:29
- Re: Quantum Pi, Paul Cardinale, 14:25
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 14:25
- Re: Magic Numbers, onehappymadman, 14:21
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?", zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:15
- Re: Quantum Pi, magicvsmagick, 14:12
- Re: Magic Numbers, onehappymadman, 14:08
- Re: Quantum Pi, Mike, 14:06
- Re: Quantum Pi, magicvsmagick, 14:05
- Re: Magic Numbers, onehappymadman, 14:02
- Re: Quantum Pi, magicvsmagick, 14:02
- Re: Quantum Pi, PD, 14:02
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 14:01
- Quantum Pi, magicvsmagick, 13:58
- Re: Magic Numbers, onehappymadman, 13:49
- Re: Magic Numbers, PD, 13:44
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 13:42
- Re: Magic Numbers, Gary, 13:16
- Re: We don't know anything, Androcles, 13:14
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 13:12
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 13:09
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 13:04
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, AJW, 13:01
- Re: We don't know anything, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 12:57
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:53
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Androcles, 12:42
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, buyanovsky, 12:42
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Sue..., 12:34
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 12:21
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, MobyDikc, 12:13
- Re: Circular orbit, mmeron, 12:10
- Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, Randy Poe, 12:05
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:59
- Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity, GSS, 11:55
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, MobyDikc, 11:45
- Re: Push gravity, Y.Porat, 11:38
- Re: We don't know anything, shevek, 11:21
- Re: We don't know anything, Traveler, 11:17
- "Is There a Force of Gravity?", Trats, 11:05
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 11:01
- Re: Push gravity, Y.Porat, 10:59
- Re: Push gravity, Mike, 10:54
- Re: Push gravity, Y.Porat, 10:52
- Re: Push gravity, Y.Porat, 10:41
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 10:32
- Re: We don't know anything, Andy Resnick, 10:29
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 10:26
- Re: Circular orbit, briggs, 10:26
- Re: Push gravity, Mike, 10:15
- Re: Circular orbit, Randy Poe, 10:14
- Re: ideas and questions about the splash of a liquid drop on a solid surface, Andy Resnick, 10:13
- Re: Push gravity, Mike, 10:10
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:10
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 10:05
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 10:05
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 09:51
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:45
- Re: Circular orbit, PD, 09:30
- Re: Circular orbit, PD, 09:28
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 09:05
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 08:55
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 08:52
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 08:50
- Re: Circular orbit, briggs, 08:26
- Re: Circular orbit, briggs, 08:18
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 08:17
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 08:04
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 07:43
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 07:35
- Re: ideas and questions about the splash of a liquid drop on a solid surface, 矿泉水, 07:31
- Re: ideas and questions about the splash of a liquid drop on a solid surface, 矿泉水, 07:22
- Re: Circular orbit, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:04
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Double-A, 06:48
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 06:47
- Re: Push gravity, Happy Hippy, 06:42
- Re: Maximum densities, Han de Bruijn, 06:07
- loop quantum blueshit, dedanoe, 06:02
- Re: Push gravity, dedanoe, 05:59
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 05:51
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., donstockbauer, 05:31
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 05:25
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, donstockbauer, 05:16
- Re: Push gravity, donstockbauer, 05:14
- Re: Push gravity, donstockbauer, 05:11
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., donstockbauer, 05:07
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Eric Gisse, 05:00
- Re: Push gravity, Eric Gisse, 04:58
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Double-A, 04:52
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, mitroister, 04:25
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Mike, 04:21
- Re: Maximum densities, mmeron, 04:19
- Re: Q: energy consumption, mmeron, 04:13
- Re: Maximum densities, tadchem, 04:08
- Re: Q: energy consumption, Jo Stein, 04:08
- Re: We don't know anything, Androcles, 03:57
- Re: Push gravity, Y.Porat, 03:43
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, tadchem, 03:42
- Re: Push gravity, Y.Porat, 03:38
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Joe Fischer, 03:30
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Ian Parker, 03:29
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 03:17
- Re: Liquid gas to gas gas expansion factor, tadchem, 03:13
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Koobee Wublee, 03:09
- Push gravity, fishfry, 03:04
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Joe Fischer, 02:57
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 02:55
- Re: We don't know anything, hanson, 02:54
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, George, 02:45
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 02:21
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 02:01
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Autymn D. C., 01:58
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 01:31
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 01:19
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 01:03
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 00:32
- We don't know anything, whisper555, 00:31
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 00:19
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Autymn D. C., 00:00
December 14, 2005
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 23:54
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 23:53
- Re: Circular orbit, gmarkowsky, 23:37
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Keith F. Lynch, 23:35
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 23:23
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 22:34
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., donstockbauer, 22:29
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 22:24
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Traveler, 21:46
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 21:43
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Mike, 21:33
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Mike, 21:17
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Gregory L. Hansen, 20:49
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, george, 20:06
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 19:59
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Michael Gray, 19:56
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 19:54
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 19:49
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 19:44
- Re: Radiation Detection Question, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:42
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 19:20
- Re: Circular orbit, Ken S. Tucker, 19:03
- Re: Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, Androcles, 17:49
- Re: HIV and AIDS are the result of life styles, not viruses., Rick, 17:34
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 17:28
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., jesper pedersen, 17:02
- Re: Helium, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:03
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 15:57
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 15:53
- Re: Circular orbit, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:50
- Re: Circular orbit, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:47
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 15:43
- Re: Lapping light ontop of itself...how bright would it get?, cnctut, 15:39
- Re: Circular orbit, briggs, 15:39
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 15:37
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 14:19
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Spindler of Kittens, 14:14
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Spindler of Kittens, 14:07
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Spindler of Kittens, 14:02
- Re: Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, John Kennaugh, 13:33
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 13:30
- "The Error in Relativistic Physics", Trats, 10:49
- Re: BYU Physics Professor vs Some Guy On Usenet, tj Frazir, 10:15
- Electromagnetic Origin of Mass, gsardin, 10:13
- Re: HIV and AIDS are the result of life styles, not viruses., Peter Köhlmann, 10:12
- Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?, LEFTY, 10:04
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, hanson, 10:03
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Traveler, 09:58
- HIV and AIDS are the result of life styles, not viruses., Jeff_Relf, 09:58
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 09:42
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Traveler, 09:30
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, jesper pedersen, 09:27
- The Speed of Light and A Dual Nature to Time, glbrad01, 09:25
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 09:19
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, hanson, 09:19
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Traveler, 09:03
- Re: Strike a match, watch it burn out... that's your life., dave . harper, 09:01
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., surrealistic-dream, 08:45
- Re: Strike a match, watch it burn out... that's your life., BearItAll, 08:40
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, jesper pedersen, 08:29
- Re: ideas and questions about the splash of a liquid drop on a solid surface, Andy Resnick, 08:23
- Re: Circulation?, Andy Resnick, 08:20
- Re: First quantum byte!, David Eather, 07:41
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 07:01
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 06:47
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 06:40
- Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus, Ian Parker, 06:36
- Re: Maximum densities, Han de Bruijn, 06:30
- Re: Maximum densities, Han de Bruijn, 06:10
- ideas and questions about the splash of a liquid drop on a solid surface, 矿泉水, 06:04
- Hvorfor strengteoretikere som Brian Greene er sprø, 616, 05:21
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, 616, 05:16
- Re: Circulation?, CWatters, 04:05
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 02:55
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Michael Gray, 02:54
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 02:52
- Art_5 : Relative Measurements in Local Reference Frames, GSS, 02:47
- Circulation?, nimcha, 02:31
- Re: Hitchhiker's Energy Guide To Wikipedia and Elsewhere, OsherD, 02:24
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 02:17
- Hitchhiker's Energy Guide To Wikipedia and Elsewhere, OsherD, 02:15
- Re: Liquid gas to gas gas expansion factor, Orion, 02:03
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Al Zenner, 01:23
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Gerard Fryer, 01:11
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Happy Dog, 00:45
- Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?, Jim Black, 00:42
- Re: Strike a match, watch it burn out... that's your life., John Bailo, 00:32
December 13, 2005
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Michael Gray, 23:32
- Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?, hanson, 23:30
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., tj Frazir, 23:12
- Revisiting Variable Constants, Sam Wormley, 21:53
- Strike a match, watch it burn out... that's your life., Jeff_Relf, 21:45
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 20:44
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 19:35
- Re: Radiation Detection Question, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:26
- Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:01
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Bobby D. Bryant, 19:00
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 18:52
- Lapping light ontop of itself...how bright would it get?, twm, 18:44
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, DaveL, 18:44
- Re: How can I build a quantum switch?, Keith Partridge, 18:37
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Shawn, 18:36
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Denis Loubet, 18:35
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Jonathan Silverlight, 18:23
- Gregory L. Hansen agrees empirical evidence shows Einstein wrong., Androcles, 18:14
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, George, 18:14
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Sam Wormley, 17:59
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, George, 17:59
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, onehappymadman, 17:53
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, george, 17:34
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 17:34
- Re: Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, Landy, 17:30
- Re: New laws of motion?, Mike, 17:10
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, jimp, 17:05
- Radioactive Dating - NOT RELIABLE, rem460, 17:02
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 16:55
- Re: All mass is the quotient of two variables, Don1, 16:34
- Re: The two faces of negative zero point vacuum pressure, Watson Ladd, 16:28
- Re: Radiation Detection Question, Andy Resnick, 16:16
- Re: Earth magnetic pole shift and Global warming?, Ken S. Tucker, 16:14
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 16:00
- Re: Liquid gas to gas gas expansion factor, fkasner, 15:54
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Autymn D. C., 15:43
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., semilatus rectum, 15:40
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 15:36
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., semilatus rectum, 15:36
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 15:35
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 15:34
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., semilatus rectum, 15:33
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 15:32
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., semilatus rectum, 15:32
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Sam Wormley, 15:30
- Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front 3.1: A Danish-German Simultaneous Review and Un-Review, OsherD, 15:29
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., semilatus rectum, 15:27
- Announcement: Experimental Chaos conference, Lou Pecora, 15:19
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 15:18
- The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front 3.1: A Danish-German Simultaneous Review and Un-Review, OsherD, 15:14
- Re: How can I build a quantum switch?, Sue..., 15:13
- Re: Maximum densities, Robert Israel, 15:11
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 15:10
- Re: Conservation of momentum?, Ken S. Tucker, 15:06
- Re: Conservation of momentum?, briggs, 15:02
- Re: Conservation of momentum?, IsaacKuo, 14:46
- Re: magnetism question, operator jay, 14:46
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Traveler, 14:45
- Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?, Jim Black, 14:40
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 14:28
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - how to publish result?, Al Zenner, 14:21
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 14:05
- Re: Conservation of momentum?, Randy Poe, 13:48
- Real skydivers do not give up. (if chute fails), Jan Panteltje, 13:39
- Re: Conservation of momentum?, Dean J Garrett, 13:33
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 13:16
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 13:13
- Re: Maximum densities, PD, 13:11
- Re: All mass is the quotient of two variables, PD, 13:09
- Re: How can I build a quantum switch?, PD, 12:52
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - how to publish result?, PD, 12:47
- Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?, PD, 12:42
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 12:35
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - how to publish result?, franklinhu, 12:32
- Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:28
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Orion, 12:23
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 12:16
- Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?, hanson, 12:11
- Re: New laws of motion?, PD, 12:07
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Randy Poe, 12:00
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 11:55
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, Matthew Lybanon, 11:50
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, jimp, 11:50
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 11:40
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Gregory L. Hansen, 11:37
- Re: magnetism question, Y.Porat, 11:33
- Bottom Line, Seto, does your IRT..., Sam Wormley, 11:29
- The two faces of negative zero point vacuum pressure, Jack Sarfatti, 11:26
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 11:20
- Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?, Sue..., 11:03
- Re: magnetism question, Sue..., 10:58
- Re: Radiation Detection Question, Puppet_Sock, 10:57
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:47
- Art_4 : Validity of Assumptions and Postulates, GSS, 10:44
- Re: magnetism question, PD, 10:42
- Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?, Puppet_Sock, 10:42
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, PD, 10:41
- "The Einstein Hoax", Trats, 10:28
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, tadchem, 10:28
- Re: Ontario salary guide for researc scientists in physics, Orion, 10:27
- Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:21
- Ontario salary guide for researc scientists in physics, guzzeva, 10:18
- Re: How can I build a quantum switch?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:17
- Radiation Detection Question, Matt, 10:10
- Call for Papers - The Journal of American Science, lansing9992004, 10:08
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., surrealistic-dream, 09:50
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 09:48
- Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?, Sam Wormley, 09:31
- Re: Hole in Earth, Sam Wormley, 09:29
- Re: The Holy Trinity (of science), Happy Hippy, 09:29
- Re: Why Relativity Is Science and Marxism Is Pseudo-Science, Orion, 09:25
- Re: Hole in Earth, operator jay, 09:25
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 09:23
- Re: magnetism question, operator jay, 09:00
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 08:55
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 08:55
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 08:54
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Happy Hippy, 08:42
- Re: magnetism question, operator jay, 08:37
- Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire, Thomas Smid, 08:19
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 08:15
- Re: No More Black Holes, George Dishman, 07:44
- Re: Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g), Sue..., 07:37
- Re: Source for Einstein's Papers, Harry, 07:28
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 07:26
- Hole in Earth, Grammar, 07:17
- Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?, Y.Porat, 06:46
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, brian a m stuckless, 06:34
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 06:15
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 06:00
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 05:55
- Re: The Holy Trinity (of science), Dr Nanduri, 05:45
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 05:40
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 05:37
- Re: Smart1234's Anti-Gravity Device (AGD) Analysis Done Years Ago, Ian Parker, 05:27
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Fermat, 05:07
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 05:05
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 05:00
- Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 04:53
- Re: Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g), glbrad01, 03:36
- Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?, Y.Porat, 03:35
- The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front 3: A Danish-German Simultaneous Review and Un-Review, OsherD, 03:17
- Re: Smart1234's Anti-Gravity Device (AGD) Analysis Done Years Ago, CWatters, 03:16
- Re: Liquid gas to gas gas expansion factor, prino, 03:05
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 03:04
- Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?, venuprasanna, 03:00
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 02:35
- Re: New laws of motion?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:22
- Re: How can I build a quantum switch?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 02:17
- Riddles of QM solved at last ?, Avi Goldberg, 02:08
- How can I build a quantum switch?, Anonymous, 02:03
- Smart1234's Anti-Gravity Device (AGD) Analysis Done Years Ago, S. Enterprize Company, 02:02
- Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front 2: An "Un-Review" Paper in arXiv, OsherD, 02:00
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 01:56
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 01:40
- The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front 2: An "Un-Review" Paper in arXiv, OsherD, 01:28
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Koobee Wublee, 01:26
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 01:22
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Lefty, 01:17
- Re: All mass is the quotient of two variables, Eric Gisse, 01:12
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Steve O, 01:09
- Re: Liquid gas to gas gas expansion factor, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 01:00
- Re: All mass is the quotient of two variables, Colleyville Alan, 00:49
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., LEFTY, 00:49
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Happy Dog, 00:41
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Happy Dog, 00:40
- Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front, OsherD, 00:24
- Re: magnetism question, RP, 00:05
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 00:02
December 12, 2005
- Re: magnetism question, Sue..., 23:40
- Re: magnetism question, Sue..., 23:27
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 23:20
- Re: magnetism question, Sue..., 23:04
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: magnetism question, muknot, 22:48
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Perspicacious, 22:44
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, platopes, 22:37
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 22:33
- Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front, OsherD, 22:08
- Re: Liquid gas to gas gas expansion factor, Bob, 21:39
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 21:17
- Re: Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g), Eric Gisse, 21:08
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 21:06
- Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front, OsherD, 21:01
- The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front, OsherD, 20:43
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., cnctut, 20:26
- Re: Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g), Don1, 20:21
- Re: magnetism question, operator jay, 20:17
- Re: magnetism question, operator jay, 20:13
- starting context, olo, 19:55
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Bill Hobba, 19:45
- Re: New laws of motion?, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 19:44
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 19:39
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Traveler, 19:38
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 19:34
- Re: magnetism question, operator jay, 19:32
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Eric Gisse, 19:15
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 19:15
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, platopes, 18:56
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 18:51
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Gregory L. Hansen, 18:36
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Gregory L. Hansen, 18:30
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., poee, 18:27
- Beyond heuristic limits: Light wall & Planck's domain, hanson, 18:22
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 18:05
- Re: Randy Poe -- GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 17:58
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:43
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:43
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Dirk Van de moortel, 17:34
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 17:30
- Re: Speaking of Faith, richard miller, 17:26
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 17:20
- Re: No More Black Holes, Joe Fischer, 17:15
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 17:01
- Re: magnetism question, Sue..., 16:53
- Re: Randy Poe -- GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 16:53
- Re: No More Black Holes, George Dishman, 16:45
- Re: No More Black Holes, George Dishman, 16:41
- Re: How you can tell if you're off track..., Norbert, 16:36
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 16:27
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Richard Henry, 16:25
- Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, richard miller, 16:23
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 16:19
- Re: No More Black Holes, Joe Fischer, 16:18
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 16:15
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 16:12
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 16:10
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 16:03
- Re: New laws of motion?, Orion, 15:56
- How you can tell if you're off track..., PD, 15:54
- Re: No More Black Holes, Luigi Caselli, 15:51
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:35
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, platopes, 15:28
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Bilge, 15:26
- Re: New laws of motion?, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 15:16
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Autymn D. C., 15:08
- The Properties of the Aether, Trats, 15:07
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Autymn D. C., 14:55
- Re: New laws of motion?, Mike, 14:51
- Re: Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g), PD, 14:51
- Re: New laws of motion?, Mike, 14:49
- Re: Mass is a constant, PD, 14:42
- Re: Mass is a constant, PD, 14:40
- Re: No More Black Holes, George Dishman, 14:38
- Re: Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g), Don1, 14:32
- Re: Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g), PD, 14:17
- Re: Randy Poe -- GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 14:15
- Re: New laws of motion?, PD, 14:14
- Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity, MobyDikc, 14:02
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Norbert, 13:59
- Physics FAQ: Can You See the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction?, Sam Wormley, 13:42
- Physics FAQ: Is Faster Than Light Travel or Communication Possible?, Sam Wormley, 13:39
- Re: Q: energy consumption, Andy Resnick, 13:33
- Re: motion of magnet, hobart Zklfed, 13:10
- Re: Randy Poe -- GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 12:57
- Re: New laws of motion?, Orion, 12:53
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 12:51
- Re: No More Black Holes, T Wake, 12:04
- Re: First quantum byte!, David Eather, 11:59
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 11:56
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Norbert, 11:53
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 11:48
- Re: Randy Poe -- GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Norbert, 11:45
- Re: Mass is a constant, Y.Porat, 11:22
- Re: Randy Poe -- GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 11:17
- Re: First quantum byte!, Ari Silverstein, 11:12
- Re: magnetism question, Y.Porat, 11:10
- Re: magnetism question, Y.Porat, 11:06
- Re: Why Relativity Is Science and Marxism Is Pseudo-Science, Orion, 11:03
- Re: Q: energy consumption, LongmuirG, 11:02
- Re: motion of magnet, Sam Wormley, 11:02
- motion of magnet, klawesyn28, 10:55
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Dastardly Fiend, 10:47
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, John C . Polasek, 10:42
- Re: Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g), Don1, 10:38
- Re: Bushies Attempt to Derail & Oppose the Climate-Change Talks inCanada, hanson, 10:38
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 10:37
- Re: 9/11 Update: Listen to the WTC floor collapses, Harry, 10:35
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Randy Poe, 10:34
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, tadchem, 10:26
- Re: Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g), hobart Zklfed, 10:07
- Re: Liquid gas to gas gas expansion factor, tadchem, 10:05
- Re: Liquid gas to gas gas expansion factor, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 09:59
- Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail, John C . Polasek, 09:55
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Sleepyhead, 09:53
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 09:49
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 09:44
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, surrealistic-dream, 09:41
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:38
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, tadchem, 09:37
- Re: New laws of motion?, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 09:37
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:34
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:30
- Re: Q: energy consumption, Andy Resnick, 09:25
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:24
- Re: Randy Poe -- GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 09:21
- Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g), Don1, 09:18
- Art_3 : Inertial Reference Frames and the ICRS, GSS, 09:12
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 09:03
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, cfilt, 08:36
- Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail, Boris Mohar, 08:35
- Re: Liquid gas to gas gas expansion factor, Collin, 08:22
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, briggs, 08:16
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, jmfbahciv, 08:15
- Re: Source for Einstein's Papers, Bruce Scott TOK, 08:15
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Traveler, 08:12
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared, Al Zenner, 07:48
- Liquid gas to gas gas expansion factor, prino, 07:42
- Re: PUSHPAK VIMAAN, donstockbauer, 07:23
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, gadge, 07:19
- Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail, donstockbauer, 07:08
- Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail, Jan Panteltje, 07:05
- Re: TERRIBLE XMAS SEASON TO YOU ALL BASTARDS, donstockbauer, 06:57
- Re: Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, Dastardly Fiend, 06:52
- Re: Why Are Princeton, Harvard, Stanford, etc. Exceptions?, donstockbauer, 06:47
- Re: A Thread For All Seasons, donstockbauer, 06:40
- Re: Randy Poe -- GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 06:18
- Re: No More Black Holes, Dastardly Fiend, 06:04
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 05:47
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, gadge, 05:45
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 12, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:44
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, gadge, 05:41
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 05:35
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Paul B. Andersen, 05:12
- Re: New laws of motion?, Y.Porat, 05:03
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 04:31
- Re: New laws of motion?, dedanoe, 04:21
- Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail, OsherD, 03:41
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 03:37
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker, 03:33
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared, FrediFizzx, 03:27
- A Thread For All Seasons, OsherD, 03:23
- Why Are Princeton, Harvard, Stanford, etc. Exceptions?, OsherD, 02:58
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Mitch Perkins, 02:36
- Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared 3: France, OsherD, 02:30
- Re: magnetism question, RP, 02:25
- Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared 2: Islamist Nations, OsherD, 02:09
- Re: Earth magnetic pole shift and Global warming?, jonah . singularity, 02:07
- Re: Very basic: what is velocity?, hobart Zklfed, 01:49
- Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail, Sam Wormley, 01:47
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared, OsherD, 01:47
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared, OsherD, 01:21
- Re: Conservation of momentum?, Sam Wormley, 01:08
- Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared, OsherD, 01:01
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: Conservation of momentum?, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: Very basic: what is velocity?, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Speaking of Faith, Sam Wormley, 00:49
- Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared, OsherD, 00:47
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bilge, 00:25
- Re: xm radio vs. direct tv, donstockbauer, 00:02
December 11, 2005
- Re: Conservation of momentum?, Sam Wormley, 23:45
- Re: Conservation of momentum?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 23:33
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 22:59
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Eric Gisse, 22:54
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 22:28
- Re: Very basic: what is velocity?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 22:26
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 22:20
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Eric Gisse, 22:09
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 21:49
- Re: Very basic: what is velocity?, Mkajuma, 21:35
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Bill Hobba, 21:33
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 21:32
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 21:14
- Very basic: what is velocity?, wazoo, 21:01
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 20:56
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 20:47
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, John C . Polasek, 20:37
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 20:33
- Re: No More Black Holes, Eric Gisse, 20:22
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 20:20
- Re: No More Black Holes, SAM ALTIERE, 19:59
- Re: No More Black Holes, Joe Fischer, 19:58
- Re: Maximum densities, Charles, 19:58
- Re: Maximum densities, Don1, 19:44
- Re: No More Black Holes, Nick, 19:18
- Maximum densities, Don1, 19:10
- Re: No More Black Holes, Nick, 19:07
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 18:22
- Re: magnetism question, Sue..., 17:43
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 17:41
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Eric Gisse, 17:34
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Paul B. Andersen, 17:17
- Re: magnetism question, operator jay, 16:56
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Paul B. Andersen, 16:40
- Randy Poe -- GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 16:32
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 16:29
- Re: magnetism question, Sue..., 16:22
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 16:21
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 16:21
- Re: Clocks With "Atomic Time" Synchronization: How ?, Jan Panteltje, 16:20
- Re: Clocks With "Atomic Time" Synchronization: How ?, Sue..., 16:15
- when a mad man's got a point to make, dedanoe, 16:13
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Paul B. Andersen, 16:04
- Clocks With "Atomic Time" Synchronization: How ?, Robert11, 16:03
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 15:58
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 15:48
- Re: magnetism question, operator jay, 15:20
- Re: Quantum computing speed limits, Dastardly Fiend, 15:17
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:53
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, AJW, 14:49
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, tj Frazir, 14:36
- xm radio vs. direct tv, Mkajuma, 14:19
- Re: New laws of motion?, CWatters, 14:18
- Re: Q: energy consumption, Chris Torek, 14:04
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:02
- Earth magnetic pole shift and Global warming?, Ken S. Tucker, 13:49
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 13:28
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:15
- Re: magnetism question, Ken S. Tucker, 13:12
- Revolution, dedanoe, 13:09
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker, 12:45
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 12:43
- Re: Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, John Kennaugh, 12:37
- Re: magnetism question, Sue..., 12:33
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:13
- Re: Conservation of momentum?, Ken S. Tucker, 11:53
- Request for help, ms, 11:52
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bob, 11:52
- Re: magnetism question, operator jay, 11:51
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:49
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, surrealistic-dream, 11:48
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, Sue..., 11:47
- Re: New laws of motion?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:46
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, Dastardly Fiend, 11:32
- Re: Conservation of momentum?, whattodo, 11:28
- Re: New laws of motion?, Y.Porat, 11:26
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Sue..., 11:18
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, gadge, 11:17
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 11:16
- canonical science today: New physics from biology?, Juan R., 11:14
- Re: pattern of electrons 4 Sam, Happy Hippy, 11:04
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 11:00
- Art_2 : Inertial Property of All Forms of Energy, GSS, 11:00
- Re: New laws of motion?, dedanoe, 11:00
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, gadge, 10:59
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 10:50
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, tadchem, 10:43
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 10:38
- Re: New laws of motion?, Traveler, 10:29
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:24
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, surrealistic-dream, 10:21
- Re: Astrophysical evidence for the existence of black holes, Happy Hippy, 10:18
- Re: Mass is a constant, tadchem, 10:06
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, surrealistic-dream, 09:56
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker, 09:44
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, gadge, 09:37
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 09:37
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bob, 09:28
- Re: Mass is a constant, John Christiansen, 09:16
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 09:14
- Re: The Holy Trinity (of science), dedanoe, 09:05
- Re: New laws of motion?, Orion, 09:05
- taken from http://dedanoe.tripod.com/nukebook/pmpm.html, dedanoe, 09:03
- Re: New laws of motion?, dedanoe, 08:58
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, gadge, 08:47
- Re: Astrophysical evidence for the existence of black holes, glbrad01, 08:39
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 08:17
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, gadge, 07:51
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 07:30
- Source for Einstein's Papers, David Findlay, 06:31
- Re: 9/11: The Truth Revealed about Eagle Eye's compulsive lying., donstockbauer, 06:17
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Jonathan Silverlight, 05:57
- Re: Metallicity of stars, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:13
- Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?, CWatters, 05:12
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 05:05
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:52
- Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!, Eric Gisse, 03:36
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Eric Gisse, 03:34
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 03:21
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 03:02
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 02:43
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 02:32
- Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!, Dastardly Fiend, 02:26
- Art_1 : Fundamental Research in Physics, GSS, 02:22
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 02:20
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, franklinhu, 01:42
- Re: magnetism question, Sue..., 01:39
- Re: No More Black Holes, BernardZ, 01:38
- Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?, -Chris-, 01:38
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 01:36
- Re: No More Black Holes, Eric Gisse, 01:31
- Re: magnetism question, Sue..., 01:31
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 01:27
- Re: magnetism question, RP, 01:25
- Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!, hanson, 01:22
- No More Black Holes, ?, 01:21
- Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: For Seto, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, platopes, 00:43
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 00:40
December 10, 2005
- Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!, tdp1001, 23:52
- Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?, Chris L., 23:47
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 23:46
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 23:43
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 23:39
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 23:35
- Re: The Holy Trinity (of science), Chris L., 23:32
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 23:27
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Sue..., 23:25
- Re: magnetism question, Chris L., 23:20
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 23:11
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Eric Gisse, 23:08
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 22:56
- For Seto, Sam Wormley, 22:37
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 22:32
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 22:27
- magnetism question, muknot, 22:23
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 22:22
- Astrophysical evidence for the existence of black holes, Sam Wormley, 22:05
- Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?, Richard Tobin, 21:27
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Eric Gisse, 21:27
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Eric Gisse, 21:25
- Re: All mass is the quotient of two variables, Don1, 21:14
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 21:00
- Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?, The Ghost In The Machine, 21:00
- Re: The Holy Trinity (of science), Sam Wormley, 20:59
- Re: Mass is a constant, Don1, 20:53
- Re: Mass is a constant, Don1, 20:49
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Bill Hobba, 20:44
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 20:43
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 20:37
- The Holy Trinity (of science), Happy Hippy, 20:28
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 20:14
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 20:12
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:56
- Re: Metallicity of stars, Sam Wormley, 19:46
- Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!, Dastardly Fiend, 19:41
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Eric Gisse, 19:33
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 19:29
- Re: No Time Travel on Digg.com, Bill Hobba, 19:17
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:15
- Re: Metallicity of stars, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:08
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:02
- Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 18:53
- Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?, Sam Wormley, 18:36
- Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?, twmonahan, 18:20
- Re: Article: On Using Chaos to Transmit Information, glbrad01, 17:55
- Conservation of momentum?, Dean J Garrett, 17:50
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 17:50
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 17:39
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 17:35
- Re: First quantum byte!, Ken S. Tucker, 17:11
- Re: Q: energy consumption, "Ivar S. Ertesvåg", 16:20
- Re: New laws of motion?, Traveler, 16:07
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Orion, 16:06
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 15:48
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 15:44
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:41
- Re: New laws of motion?, Orion, 15:40
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:38
- No Time Travel on Digg.com, Traveler, 15:30
- Article: On Using Chaos to Transmit Information, Robert Karl Stonjek, 15:09
- New laws of motion?, joe_avery_2005, 14:58
- Re: Mass is a constant, Paul Mays, 14:53
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 14:52
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Paul Mays, 14:51
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 14:50
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 14:48
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 14:47
- Re: Anybody's mass, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 14:39
- Re: Mass is a constant, Don1, 14:29
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 14:19
- Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!, Sam Wormley, 14:12
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 14:09
- Re: Mass is a constant, Sam Wormley, 14:09
- Re: Anybody's mass, Igor, 14:05
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker, 13:34
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., hanson, 13:33
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, DaveL, 13:14
- Re: energy consumption, Dastardly Fiend, 13:00
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, googlegroups2sucks, 12:47
- Re: First quantum byte!, Luc The Perverse, 12:38
- quote dedanoe's quotes, dedanoe, 12:21
- Just kidding, dedanoe, 12:16
- Re: Mass is a constant, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 12:14
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 12:11
- Re: Mass is a constant, dedanoe, 12:09
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Traveler, 11:56
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 11:48
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bob, 11:09
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, platopes, 11:09
- Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!, Jan Panteltje, 11:03
- Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:47
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:45
- Re: physics1012707, operator jay, 10:35
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:34
- Mass is a constant, Don1, 10:34
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:17
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:13
- Re: FASCISM , was Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 10:11
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 10:10
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 10:10
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:09
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 10:07
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 10:01
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 10:00
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 09:58
- Re: Metallicity of stars, Sam Wormley, 09:46
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 09:38
- Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!, Sam Wormley, 09:31
- Re: deuterium separation, donstockbauer, 09:12
- Re: Teaching ID as religion is a dangerous affair, donstockbauer, 09:06
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Sleepyhead, 09:01
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, jem, 09:01
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, jem, 08:55
- Re: Anybody's mass, thomas guild, 08:49
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Sleepyhead, 08:34
- Re: deuterium separation, Orion, 08:30
- Relativity, Evolution, and Intelligent Design, glbrad01, 08:28
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, jmfbahciv, 08:16
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, jmfbahciv, 08:12
- Re: physics1012707, Dave, 08:02
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 07:56
- Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!, tdp1001, 07:52
- Re: Lorentzian accurate? (Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate...), Bilge, 07:37
- Is It An Absolute That Andromeda Is Going To Collide With The Milky Way?, glbrad01, 07:25
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, Hero . van . Jindelt, 07:06
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, Jan Panteltje, 07:04
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 06:57
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 06:40
- Re: First quantum byte!, Mxsmanic, 06:22
- Re: Metric mass: The quotient of two variables, Joseph Fagan, 06:14
- Re: All mass is the quotient of two variables, Joseph Fagan, 06:09
- Re: First quantum byte!, Luc The Perverse, 05:47
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 05:43
- Re: "How I wasted my life engaging in useless Usenet argle-bargles", dedanoe, 05:00
- don't ya, dedanoe, 04:58
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Jean-Paul Turcaud, 04:48
- Re: A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, Ja ♥, 04:24
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bob Cain, 03:56
- Re: particle collisions, IsaacKuo, 03:38
- Re: Metallicity of stars, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:32
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bob Cain, 03:31
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:16
- Re: A simple method to create robust DNA "pyramids" that self-assemble, donstockbauer, 03:13
- "How I wasted my life engaging in useless Usenet argle-bargles", donstockbauer, 03:03
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., donstockbauer, 02:59
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Henri Wilson, 02:55
- Re: tj Frazir's "Manhatten Xmass" party, hanson, 02:46
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 02:45
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, donstockbauer, 02:43
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, donstockbauer, 02:42
- Re: particle collisions, mmeron, 02:42
- Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, donstockbauer, 02:40
- Re: tj Frazir's "Manhatten Xmass" party, donstockbauer, 02:30
- tj Frazir's "Manhatten Xmass" party, hanson, 02:21
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, donstockbauer, 02:16
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 02:09
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 02:00
- Re: Wind Directions?, Y.Porat, 01:41
- Re: physics1012707, gubernacullum, 01:15
- What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?, Sam Wormley, 00:41
- Re: A simple method to create robust DNA "pyramids" that self-assemble, Sam Wormley, 00:40
- A possible explantion for the origin of Earth's magnetic field - the weather, franklinhu, 00:36
- Re: Refractive index and dielectric constant, Jack// ani, 00:03
December 09, 2005
- Re: Anybody's mass, Sam Wormley, 23:54
- More Often Than Not, Massive Galaxies Form by Mergers, Sam Wormley, 23:49
- Re: Manhatten NYNY Holiday dock Xmass in NY eta waypoint, tj Frazir, 23:46
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 23:38
- Re: Manhatten NYNY Holiday new year sci phy party, tj Frazir, 23:29
- Re: Manhatten NYNY Holiday dock Xmass in NY eta waypoint, tj Frazir, 23:14
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, googlegroups2sucks, 23:14
- Re: First quantum byte!, Mxsmanic, 23:05
- Re: Q: energy consumption, tj Frazir, 23:05
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 23:05
- Re: Einstein in 2010, tj Frazir, 22:56
- Re: particle collisions, Sam Wormley, 22:45
- Re: Anybody's mass, Sam Wormley, 22:43
- Re: Anybody's mass, donstockbauer, 22:10
- Re: All mass is the quotient of two variables, odin, 22:00
- Anybody's mass, Don1, 21:59
- particle collisions, Tzazak, 21:58
- Re: Einstein in 2010, donstockbauer, 21:51
- Re: Einstein in 2010, Orion, 21:35
- Re: Q: energy consumption, LongmuirG, 21:35
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 21:31
- Re: All mass is the quotient of two variables, Sam Wormley, 21:30
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 21:30
- All mass is the quotient of two variables, Don1, 21:06
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 20:59
- Re: Collision between two particles (quadratic formula, is the + or - solution correct?), Steven Gray, 20:43
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 20:26
- Re: Manhatten NYNY Holiday dock Xmass in NY eta waypoint, donstockbauer, 20:10
- Re: Magic Numbers, Dastardly Fiend, 20:08
- Re: New Green EXTORTION -- Enviros demand your $$$, donstockbauer, 20:02
- Re: Metric mass: The quotient of two variables, Sam Wormley, 19:54
- Re: New Green EXTORTION -- Enviros demand your $$$, hanson, 19:54
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., hanson, 19:44
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 19:36
- Metric mass: The quotient of two variables, Don1, 19:22
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Publius, 19:10
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 18:55
- Re: physics1012707, Dave, 18:47
- Manhatten NYNY Holiday dock Xmass in NY eta waypoint, tj Frazir, 18:40
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 18:39
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dirk Van de moortel, 18:30
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, surrealistic-dream, 18:25
- Re: Perseus arm is closer than thought, tj Frazir, 18:24
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., hanson, 18:11
- Re: deuterium separation, Puppet_Sock, 18:09
- Re: Wind Directions?, Dastardly Fiend, 18:07
- Re: Perseus arm is closer than thought, tj Frazir, 18:07
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 18:04
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 17:48
- Re: physics1012707, gubernacullum, 17:40
- Re: New Green EXTORTION -- Enviros demand your $$$, tj Frazir, 17:39
- Re: BEER BEER BEER, tj Frazir, 17:35
- Re: First quantum byte!, Ken S. Tucker, 17:17
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Seeker, 17:09
- Re: Q: energy consumption, "Ivar S. Ertesvåg", 16:53
- A simple method to create robust DNA "pyramids" that self-assemble, Sam Wormley, 16:44
- Re: First quantum byte!, Jan Panteltje, 16:39
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 9 Dec 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 16:31
- Re: Q: energy consumption, LongmuirG, 16:28
- Re: First quantum byte!, Unruh, 16:26
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 16:22
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Jan Panteltje, 16:10
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 16:10
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 16:06
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., PD, 16:02
- Re: What to do with Employee Stock Purchase Plan, donstockbauer, 15:46
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Sleepyhead, 15:40
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 15:39
- Re: deuterium separation, mmeron, 15:31
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bob Cain, 15:29
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:29
- Re: Refractive index and dielectric constant, mmeron, 15:24
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 15:09
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 15:09
- Re: First quantum byte!, Ken S. Tucker, 15:00
- Re: Q: energy consumption, "Ivar S. Ertesvåg", 14:59
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 14:53
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, PD, 14:45
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, mmeron, 14:40
- Re: physics1012707, PD, 14:40
- Re: physics1012707, Dave, 14:34
- Re: First quantum byte!, Unruh, 14:27
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 14:27
- Re: First quantum byte!, Ken S. Tucker, 14:00
- Re: Refractive index and dielectric constant, PD, 13:43
- Re: Refractive index and dielectric constant, tadchem, 13:34
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 12:47
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bob, 12:45
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bob, 12:43
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Traveler, 12:32
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 12:19
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, googlegroups2sucks, 12:18
- Re: First quantum byte!, Unruh, 12:17
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, surrealistic-dream, 12:16
- Re: deuterium separation, Bernhard Kuemel, 12:16
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 12:06
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, PD, 12:03
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., surrealistic-dream, 12:03
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, mluttgens, 12:02
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 12:01
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, T Wake, 11:56
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 11:51
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 11:42
- Refractive index and dielectric constant, Jack// ani, 11:40
- Re: Perseus arm is closer than thought, tadchem, 11:38
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, hanson, 11:32
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 11:29
- Re: Lorentzian accurate? (Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate...), Autymn D. C., 11:24
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 11:23
- Re: Lorentzian accurate? (Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate...), Autymn D. C., 11:22
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 11:04
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 11:02
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 11:02
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 10:59
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 10:54
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 10:53
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:38
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, PD, 10:27
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:25
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, PD, 10:23
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, Don1, 10:21
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:17
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., PD, 10:17
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Brablo, 10:12
- "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Drac, 10:07
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, PD, 10:00
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 13: All Energy is Expansive, All Mass is Contractive, OsherD, 10:00
- Re: Wind Directions?, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
- Re: deuterium separation, tadchem, 09:59
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 09:58
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 11: "Unto Thyself Be True" As Feedback, OsherD, 09:56
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:54
- Re: Wind Directions?, PD, 09:54
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., PD, 09:50
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 09:50
- Re: Wind Directions?, Y.Porat, 09:50
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 09:49
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 09:46
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., surrealistic-dream, 09:41
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 13: All Energy is Expansive, All Mass is Contractive, OsherD, 09:40
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, PD, 09:39
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:38
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:37
- Re: Universal form: An expanding hypersphere, PD, 09:35
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:33
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Autymn D. C., 09:33
- Re: First quantum byte!, Gabriele Avosani, 09:31
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:29
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 09:27
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:23
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, tadchem, 09:21
- Re: Vacuum Manifolds in Sponaneous Broken Symmetry, Autymn D. C., 09:16
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:15
- deuterium separation, Bernhard Kuemel, 08:56
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, AndyCav, 08:55
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, jem, 08:54
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, Don1, 08:52
- Re: in need of a science gift idea, Andy Resnick, 08:46
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, jmfbahciv, 08:33
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, tadchem, 08:27
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 08:25
- Re: First quantum byte!, David Eather, 08:19
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:15
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, tadchem, 07:54
- Re: nobel ceremony to be broadcast live on the net today, gubernacullum, 07:52
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 07:46
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 07:38
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 07:32
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 07:31
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, jmfbahciv, 07:21
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 07:14
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Paul B. Andersen, 07:11
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 07:10
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Don1, 07:01
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, Dr Nanduri, 06:55
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, longjearns, 06:38
- Re: in need of a science gift idea, jmfbahciv, 06:38
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., jmfbahciv, 06:34
- Re: nobel ceremony to be broadcast live on the net today, gubernacullum, 05:49
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, David Macmanus, 05:42
- nobel ceremony to be broadcast live on the net today, gubernacullum, 05:34
- physics1012707, gubernacullum, 05:30
- Re: TERRIBLE XMAS SEASON TO YOU ALL BASTARDS, Wally Anglesea™, 05:24
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Fermat, 05:01
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Henri Wilson, 04:48
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 04:36
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 04:30
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 04:26
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 04:24
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, tadchem, 04:08
- Special Relativity as applied to "Black Holes"? <speculation>, Eric Flesch, 03:33
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 03:27
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker, 03:23
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, D.B. Calhoun, 03:22
- Re: Perseus arm is closer than thought, Eric Flesch, 03:20
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 03:09
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, donstockbauer, 03:02
- Send bilge a copy. He reads at : alt.morons, Sue..., 02:42
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 9: Dark Energy is Knowledge/Semantic Information, donstockbauer, 02:37
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 10: A Hitchhiker's Space Warp, donstockbauer, 02:28
- Re: Vacuum Manifolds in Sponaneous Broken Symmetry, donstockbauer, 02:24
- Re: GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, Sue..., 02:14
- Re: Wind Directions?, donstockbauer, 02:12
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 12: An Artificial Planet, donstockbauer, 02:09
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 11: "Unto Thyself Be True" As Feedback, donstockbauer, 02:06
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 12: An Artificial Planet, OsherD, 02:03
- Re: Wind Directions?, Y.Porat, 02:02
- Re: TERRIBLE XMAS SEASON TO YOU ALL BASTARDS, donstockbauer, 01:59
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 11: "Unto Thyself Be True" As Feedback, OsherD, 01:30
- Vacuum Manifolds in Sponaneous Broken Symmetry, Jack Sarfatti, 01:08
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 10: A Hitchhiker's Space Warp, OsherD, 01:07
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 10: A Hitchhiker's Space Warp, OsherD, 00:56
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, surrealistic-dream, 00:52
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 9: Dark Energy is Knowledge/Semantic Information, OsherD, 00:36
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 9: Dark Energy is Knowledge/Semantic Information, OsherD, 00:21
December 08, 2005
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 9: Dark Energy is Knowledge/Semantic Information, OsherD, 23:54
- Re: Q: energy consumption, Scott A Crosby, 23:50
- Re: Perseus arm is closer than thought, Happy Hippy, 23:47
- Re: Q: energy consumption, LongmuirG, 23:43
- Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal, Tom Roberts, 23:38
- Perseus arm is closer than thought, Sam Wormley, 23:38
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 9: Dark Energy is Knowledge/Semantic Information, OsherD, 23:36
- Re: Lorentzian accurate? (Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate...), Bilge, 23:34
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 9: Dark Energy is Knowledge/Semantic Information, OsherD, 23:26
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:10
- Re: First quantum byte!, Mxsmanic, 23:07
- Re: First quantum byte!, Mxsmanic, 23:06
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 22:59
- Re: Quantum computing speed limits, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 22:55
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 22:44
- Quantum computing speed limits, david petry, 22:09
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: Universal form: An expanding hypersphere, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Eric Gisse, 21:46
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Eric Gisse, 21:42
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 21:21
- Re: When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, jimp, 21:15
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Don1, 21:13
- When the landing gears of big planes don't come out,, Frank, 20:57
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Don1, 20:45
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Eric Gisse, 20:43
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Eric Gisse, 20:41
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Don1, 20:35
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 20:22
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 20:18
- GPS ex Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 20:06
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 20:05
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Eric Gisse, 20:03
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 20:01
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:49
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 19:45
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Eric Gisse, 19:41
- Re: Wind Directions?, AJW, 19:31
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 19:28
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 19:24
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, brianf, 19:24
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 19:09
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 19:04
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Dastardly Fiend, 18:59
- Re: First quantum byte!, Ken S. Tucker, 18:51
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, donstockbauer, 18:38
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 18:32
- Re: hypothetical air circulation, warren . sensei, 18:30
- Re: in need of a science gift idea, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:22
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Don1, 18:18
- in need of a science gift idea, tseverson@xxxxxxxxx, 18:14
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Publius, 18:10
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 18:01
- Re: First quantum byte!, Unruh, 17:58
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, Don1, 17:57
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, John Christiansen, 17:43
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:38
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:36
- Re: DedaNoe's got the POWER!!, dedanoe, 17:32
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 17:31
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:15
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 17:03
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Autymn D. C., 17:02
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, PD, 16:51
- Re: hypothetical air circulation, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 16:40
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 16:37
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, PD, 16:28
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, T Wake, 16:25
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Eric Gisse, 16:22
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, PD, 16:20
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, Eric Gisse, 16:17
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Eric Gisse, 16:15
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, Don1, 16:06
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 15:52
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., hanson, 15:43
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, hanson, 15:40
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 15:37
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bob, 15:36
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:33
- Re: Q: energy consumption, stinkeroo, 15:29
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, T Wake, 15:27
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:19
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:17
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:15
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:09
- Re: Q: energy consumption, PD, 14:56
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Don1, 14:53
- Re: First quantum byte!, Ken S. Tucker, 14:52
- Re: Q: energy consumption, Puppet_Sock, 14:51
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:46
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 14:44
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, PD, 14:28
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 14:28
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Dastardly Fiend, 14:27
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 14:22
- Re: hypothetical air circulation, Puppet_Sock, 14:20
- Re: Q: energy consumption, Ken Muldrew, 14:20
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 14:20
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 14:10
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 14:09
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., PD, 14:03
- Re: DedaNoe's got the POWER!!, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:46
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Don1, 13:45
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, brian a m stuckless, 13:36
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Autymn D. C., 13:31
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., PD, 13:19
- Q: energy consumption, Andy Resnick, 13:15
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, guenther vonKnakspot, 13:04
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Autymn D. C., 13:03
- hypothetical air circulation, sarahsbs, 13:02
- Re: Wind Directions?, PD, 12:51
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., PD, 12:47
- hypothetical air circulation, sarahsbs, 12:40
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Sleepyhead, 12:39
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Autymn D. C., 12:28
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 12:16
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 12:16
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Autymn D. C., 12:08
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
- Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, jaska, 11:55
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, Don1, 11:55
- Re: First quantum byte!, Mxsmanic, 11:54
- Re: Equations to compute scissor jack, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:53
- Re: First quantum byte!, Mxsmanic, 11:53
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, PD, 11:44
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, PD, 11:36
- Re: First quantum byte!, Unruh, 11:34
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., surrealistic-dream, 11:33
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, PD, 11:33
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:33
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, WinField, 11:31
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:25
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:23
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, surrealistic-dream, 11:13
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:55
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 10:55
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:50
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:43
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 10:37
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 10:36
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:31
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:30
- Re: pattern of electrons 4 Sam, Happy Hippy, 10:19
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, jem, 10:02
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:57
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:56
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., jimp, 09:55
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, jem, 09:53
- "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Doog, 09:50
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jem, 09:40
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:36
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Daryl McCullough, 09:36
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:36
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 09:33
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 09:33
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Randy Poe, 09:23
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., AllYou!, 09:16
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:15
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., jmfbahciv, 09:15
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:13
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 09:09
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, donstockbauer, 09:06
- Re: Capillary Rise, CWatters, 09:06
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., Charles, 08:56
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., jmfbahciv, 08:49
- Re: The measure of mass is inertia, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 08:47
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 08:36
- The measure of mass is inertia, Don1, 08:35
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 08:28
- Magic Numbers, Gary, 08:20
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, scienstein, 08:18
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., Charles, 08:00
- Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History, hanson, 07:58
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, hanson, 07:58
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., jmfbahciv, 07:41
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Don1, 07:41
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., Charles, 07:36
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, Jay R. Yablon, 07:31
- Re: First quantum byte!, David Eather, 07:30
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., jmfbahciv, 07:23
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 07:18
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 07:12
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, tadchem, 05:59
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Dastardly Fiend, 05:28
- DedaNoe's got the POWER!!, dedanoe, 05:13
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:32
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker, 03:31
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:07
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 8: Knowledge Equation Analysis of Geology, OsherD, 03:04
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 8: Knowledge Equation Analysis of Geology, OsherD, 03:00
- I am confused!, ra, 02:46
- Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History, OsherD, 02:45
- I am confused!, ra, 02:35
- I am confused!, ra, 02:33
- Re: Two teams of physicists have stored a single photon of light, Y.Porat, 02:32
- Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History, OsherD, 02:29
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, hanson, 02:26
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, brian a m stuckless, 01:51
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, brian a m stuckless, 01:47
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 8: Knowledge Equation Analysis of Geology, OsherD, 01:47
- Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History, hanson, 01:36
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 01:31
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 01:22
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 01:15
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 01:11
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 01:01
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 00:51
- Re: Two teams of physicists have stored a single photon of light, Sam Wormley, 00:37
- Re: Two teams of physicists have stored a single photon of light, Mike, 00:35
- Collision between two particles (quadratic formula, is the + or - solution correct?), robison, 00:35
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Bob Cain, 00:30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bob Cain, 00:22
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, nasaiya, 00:21
- Re: Two teams of physicists have stored a single photon of light, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:19
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bob Cain, 00:16
- OT: Don't blame me dude..., Bob, 00:10
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:09
- frequency of pendulum cone, tarjanrobert1234, 00:07
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
December 07, 2005
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, Jay R. Yablon, 23:46
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:45
- Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?, tj Frazir, 23:04
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, Jay R. Yablon, 22:57
- Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?, tj Frazir, 22:55
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 22:31
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 22:29
- Two teams of physicists have stored a single photon of light, Sam Wormley, 22:16
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 7: Gondwanaland and Laurasia, OsherD, 22:05
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 7: Gondwanaland and Laurasia, OsherD, 22:03
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Eric Gisse, 22:03
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 22:03
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Eric Gisse, 21:51
- Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History, OsherD, 21:51
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:47
- Re: Wind Directions?, W. Watson, 21:47
- Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History, OsherD, 21:45
- Re: First quantum byte!, Mxsmanic, 21:42
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Don1, 21:41
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Don1, 21:41
- Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History, donstockbauer, 21:40
- Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection, W. Watson, 21:37
- Re: Wind Directions?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:36
- Re: Wind Directions?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:36
- Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History, OsherD, 21:35
- Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection, AJW, 21:34
- Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection, AJW, 21:33
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 20:17
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, charlie12345, 19:17
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, David R Tribble, 19:17
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 18:58
- Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection, Dastardly Fiend, 18:43
- Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection, Dastardly Fiend, 18:38
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 18:27
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 18:16
- Re: Wind Directions?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:49
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, Ken S. Tucker, 17:44
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, PD, 17:40
- Re: Wind Directions?, W. Watson, 17:34
- Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection, PD, 17:32
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 17:30
- Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection, W. Watson, 17:26
- Re: Capillary Rise, Sam Wormley, 17:10
- Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection, IsaacKuo, 17:03
- A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Don1, 16:51
- Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection, Charles, 16:45
- Re: Capillary Rise, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:38
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:34
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., Dastardly Fiend, 16:33
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 16:27
- Capillary Rise, deplifer, 16:25
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 16:15
- Re: Wind Directions?, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:12
- Stop tripping balls, Martin., Jeff_Relf, 16:12
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Randy Poe, 16:06
- Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism, Ken S. Tucker, 16:06
- Re: Wind Directions?, PD, 16:05
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:59
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Randy Poe, 15:39
- Re: Wind Directions?, AJW, 15:35
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 15:30
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, PD, 15:29
- Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection, PD, 15:26
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 15:22
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:21
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bob, 15:17
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:15
- Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection, Eric Gisse, 15:15
- Double Your Momentum, Reflection, W. Watson, 15:10
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, AJW, 15:04
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 15:02
- Re: Diff. in Theoretical Capacitance value and Coventor value?, Tom, 15:00
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Dastardly Fiend, 14:42
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 14:37
- Re: Wind Directions?, Dastardly Fiend, 14:36
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Randy Poe, 14:22
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:21
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 14:07
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 14:06
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 14:05
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Brablo, 14:01
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 13:51
- Re: Equations to compute scissor jack, Nguyen, 13:45
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 13:44
- Re: Wind Directions?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:44
- Re: Wind Directions?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:42
- Re: Equations to compute scissor jack, Sam Wormley, 13:39
- Equations to compute scissor jack, Nguyen, 13:35
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., AllYou!, 13:33
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., Dirk Van de moortel, 13:28
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:28
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 13:27
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Greg Neill, 13:26
- Re: pattern of electrons 4 Sam, Sam Wormley, 13:26
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, Josef Matz, 13:25
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Sam Wormley, 13:24
- Re: Building homes deep underground..., Sam Wormley, 13:23
- Re: Wind Directions?, Sam Wormley, 13:22
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., aktovka, 13:18
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:11
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Brablo, 13:09
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Tim, 13:08
- Re: Wind Directions?, donstockbauer, 13:07
- Wind Directions?, W. Watson, 13:04
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, donstockbauer, 13:04
- Building homes deep underground..., Brablo, 12:58
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, mmeron, 12:57
- Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?, Brablo, 12:51
- Re: HAPPY XMAS SEASON TO YOU ALL BASTARDS, donstockbauer, 12:43
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, Josef Matz, 12:37
- GRAVITATION, ACE, 12:30
- pattern of electrons 4 Sam, Happy Hippy, 12:28
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, David Macmanus, 12:28
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, David Macmanus, 12:24
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, PD, 12:07
- December caption, Null, 12:00
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 757 December 7, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 11:58
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 11:54
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, David Macmanus, 11:53
- Ratio Mu/Ru, wgilmour, 11:51
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Dastardly Fiend, 11:50
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, Bruce Scott TOK, 11:49
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:49
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Sleepyhead, 11:43
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:42
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, David Macmanus, 11:41
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, PD, 11:34
- Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, SBC Yahoo, 11:33
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 11:32
- Re: BEER BEER BEER, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 11:21
- Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, jaska, 11:15
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, David Macmanus, 11:13
- Re: Far Out: Exploding dark-matter balls predicted, Sam Wormley, 11:07
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 11:03
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Jan Panteltje, 11:03
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, PD, 11:02
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
- Re: Far Out: Exploding dark-matter balls predicted, Sue meht, 10:57
- What an education., Jeff_Relf, 10:52
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, David Macmanus, 10:52
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, PD, 10:49
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 10:46
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 10:46
- Re: Electrostatic gas mixing?, PD, 10:42
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, David Macmanus, 10:41
- tits., Jeff_Relf, 10:40
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, PD, 10:38
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:37
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, PD, 10:35
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, David Macmanus, 10:34
- Re: Don't blame me dude..., Richard Tobin, 10:31
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, hanson, 10:29
- Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, Josef Matz, 10:28
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., hanson, 10:28
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:28
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 10:24
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, brianf, 10:21
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 10:18
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 10:17
- H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?, David Macmanus, 10:16
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:13
- Re: Diff. in Theoretical Capacitance value and Coventor value?, CWatters, 10:12
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:11
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 10:07
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:07
- Diff. in Theoretical Capacitance value and Coventor value?, deplifer, 10:03
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, The Ghost In The Machine, 09:59
- Re: Casual sex/relationships, stolen music/ and commuting by email., The Ghost In The Machine, 09:59
- "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Doog, 09:44
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., surrealistic-dream, 09:25
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Sam Wormley, 09:10
- Re: ORGASM DIFFICULTY, Tameyoshi Noda, 08:42
- Re: Don't blame me dude..., amosf (Tim Fairchild), 08:40
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., AllYou!, 08:32
- Re: Don't blame me dude..., BearItAll, 08:19
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 08:14
- Re: Imagine what you could do if you had a disposable identity., Mark Martin, 07:48
- Re: Don't blame me dude..., Mark Martin, 07:40
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 07:35
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Dastardly Fiend, 07:14
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Tim, 07:03
- Re: Don't blame me dude..., Eric Gisse, 06:33
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, brianf, 06:31
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, Dastardly Fiend, 06:25
- The Inconsistency Of Big Bang Frozen Frame Picture, glbrad01, 06:09
- Don't blame me dude..., Jeff_Relf, 05:59
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Dastardly Fiend, 05:16
- Re: Casual sex/relationships, stolen music/ and commuting by email., BearItAll, 04:24
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 6: It All Started in Japan & Then U.K., OsherD, 03:54
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dastardly Fiend, 03:50
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 6: It All Started in Japan & Then U.K., OsherD, 03:21
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., 616, 03:13
- Re: Imagine what you could do if you had a disposable identity., amosf (Tim Fairchild), 03:10
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 6: It All Started in Japan & Then U.K., OsherD, 03:09
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, brianf, 02:58
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 6: It All Started in Japan & Then U.K., OsherD, 02:53
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 6: It All Started in Japan & Then U.K., OsherD, 02:09
- Imagine what you could do if you had a disposable identity., Jeff_Relf, 01:24
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:11
- Re: Will WWIII start March 2006?, Josef Matz, 00:52
- Re: Radiometer Pressure, Sam Wormley, 00:48
- Electrostatic gas mixing?, gpratt, 00:45
- Radiometer Pressure, Bret Cahill, 00:41
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Sam Wormley, 00:39
- Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:35
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 00:31
- Re: What's "Synchronization"?, Sam Wormley, 00:24
- What's "Synchronization"?, Bret Cahill, 00:18
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 5: Chinese Feedback, donstockbauer, 00:02
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 5: Chinese Feedback, OsherD, 00:02
December 06, 2005
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 23:59
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 23:46
- Re: Will WWIII start March 2006?, LEFTY, 23:41
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dastardly Fiend, 23:04
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 22:50
- Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?, Sam Wormley, 22:48
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 22:47
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 5: Chinese Feedback, OsherD, 22:46
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Sam Wormley, 22:43
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, Sam Wormley, 22:36
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, Sam Wormley, 22:30
- Far Out: Exploding dark-matter balls predicted, Sam Wormley, 22:20
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 22:00
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:40
- Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!, TomGee, 21:29
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Paul Mays, 21:16
- Re: What am I using, and to what end ?, Mark Martin, 21:12
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, Eric Gisse, 21:08
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 21:04
- Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!, TomGee, 21:00
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", SOiL, 20:50
- What am I using, and to what end ?, Jeff_Relf, 20:44
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:24
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, Happy Hippy, 20:11
- Like most, I've become creepy and cynical with old age, unable to change., Jeff_Relf, 20:10
- Re: The Upcoming Age Of Levers, donstockbauer, 20:10
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, nasaiya, 20:07
- Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?, Happy Hippy, 20:05
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:05
- Re: Universal form: An expanding hypersphere, Happy Hippy, 20:00
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., PD, 19:56
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 19:55
- Re: Casual sex/relationships, stolen music/ and commuting by email., Eric Gisse, 19:54
- Ethen and Patinha are basically spoiled brats, _Everyone_ spoils them., Jeff_Relf, 19:53
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 19:51
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 19:50
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 19:50
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 19:47
- Re: Casual sex/relationships, stolen music/ and commuting by email., ?, 19:44
- Re: Universal form: An expanding hypersphere, ?, 19:41
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 19:24
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Peter, 19:10
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dastardly Fiend, 18:36
- Re: Casual sex/relationships, stolen music/ and commuting by email., T Wake, 18:21
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, Dastardly Fiend, 18:19
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Peter, 18:08
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Tim, 17:49
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 17:39
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 17:29
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, PD, 17:25
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Llanzlan Klazmon, 17:23
- Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!, PD, 17:20
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Llanzlan Klazmon, 17:20
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 17:04
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 17:02
- Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!, Sam Wormley, 16:57
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 16:54
- Re: Casual sex/relationships, stolen music/ and commuting by email., Kadaitcha Man, 16:44
- Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:44
- Re: Casual sex/relationships, stolen music/ and commuting by email., Mark Martin, 16:44
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, PD, 16:43
- Re: Casual sex/relationships, stolen music/ and commuting by email., donstockbauer, 16:25
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 16:19
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, nasaiya, 16:13
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Don1, 16:10
- Re: The Upcoming Age Of Levers, Charles, 16:09
- Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!, PD, 16:01
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 15:48
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., surrealistic-dream, 15:32
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., surrealistic-dream, 15:21
- Re: The Upcoming Age Of Levers, dedanoe, 15:12
- Re: Universal form: An expanding hypersphere, T Wake, 15:11
- Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!, TomGee, 15:11
- Re: String theory?, T Wake, 15:08
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, T Wake, 15:08
- Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?, T Wake, 15:07
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:06
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:03
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, David Thomson, 14:56
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, Ken S. Tucker, 14:55
- Re: The Upcoming Age Of Levers, Paul Cardinale, 14:54
- Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?, Wai Yu Wong, 14:54
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, David Thomson, 14:37
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Mark Martin, 14:36
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Wordsmith, 14:32
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Wordsmith, 14:29
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, David Thomson, 14:20
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 14:20
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 4: Chaplygin Dark Energy-Matter Unification, OsherD, 14:18
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov, hanson, 14:14
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Mark Martin, 14:04
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Douglas Eagleson, 14:00
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 13:55
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov, OsherD, 13:52
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 13:51
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 13:49
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 13:46
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., hanson, 13:45
- Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots, Puppet_Sock, 13:42
- Casual sex/relationships, stolen music/ and commuting by email., Jeff_Relf, 13:33
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, PD, 12:43
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 12:35
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Sleepyhead, 12:31
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., surrealistic-dream, 12:29
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Sleepyhead, 12:24
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 12:20
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 12:20
- WHAT "vacuum"? WHAT "empty space"? WHAT error-bars.?!!, brian a m stuckless, 12:14
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., brian a m stuckless, 12:14
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., hanson, 12:14
- Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, Ian Parker, 12:08
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 12:00
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 11:56
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 11:48
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., brian a m stuckless, 11:33
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., surrealistic-dream, 11:32
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., surrealistic-dream, 11:29
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 11:27
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., surrealistic-dream, 11:16
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 11:05
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:04
- Re: String theory?, Mark Martin, 11:02
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:36
- Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, jaska, 10:30
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Sam Wormley, 10:19
- Re: String theory?, donstockbauer, 10:14
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 10:14
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., joe_avery_2005, 10:13
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, brian a m stuckless, 10:12
- Re: String theory?, Mark Martin, 10:05
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 09:59
- Universal form: An expanding hypersphere, ?, 09:57
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 09:56
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 09:51
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 09:50
- Re: String theory?, ?, 09:49
- Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?, ?, 09:44
- "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Doog, 09:44
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 09:40
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, Sue..., 09:40
- Re: Give up Black Holes, ?, 09:34
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 09:24
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:20
- The Upcoming Age Of Levers, dedanoe, 08:27
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 08:16
- Dimesional waves and Space time alignment(An idea), satish, 07:52
- Micro White Holes, glbrad01, 07:15
- Re: echo paradox, donstockbauer, 06:48
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, donstockbauer, 06:38
- Re: Who's to blame, ever... physical processes determine absolutely everything., donstockbauer, 06:21
- Re: Education tools, donstockbauer, 06:18
- Re: Education tools, Dastardly Fiend, 06:14
- Re: Will WWIII start March 2006?, donstockbauer, 06:10
- Re: Will WWIII start March 2006?, Josef Matz, 06:03
- Education tools, liska273, 05:51
- Re: Who's to blame, ever... physical processes determine absolutely everything., glbrad01, 05:47
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 04:01
- echo paradox, ante, 03:43
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, Dastardly Fiend, 03:29
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov, hanson, 02:17
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov, OsherD, 01:09
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 00:59
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 00:58
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov, OsherD, 00:51
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov, OsherD, 00:36
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov, OsherD, 00:03
- Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots, Sam Wormley, 00:00
December 05, 2005
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:59
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 23:52
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 23:38
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:30
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, TomGee, 23:24
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, TomGee, 23:11
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, nasaiya, 22:55
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 22:11
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Dante Alighieri, 22:10
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 22:07
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, hanson, 22:02
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, Ken S. Tucker, 21:47
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:41
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov, OsherD, 21:30
- Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots, Mark Martin, 21:12
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, Ken S. Tucker, 21:08
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 21:03
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 21:02
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 20:56
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dastardly Fiend, 20:55
- Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?, Mark Martin, 20:45
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dastardly Fiend, 20:36
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 20:33
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 20:29
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Don1, 20:22
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Mark Martin, 20:14
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 20:01
- Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?, T Wake, 19:51
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Publius, 19:41
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, kdthrge, 19:15
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, T Wake, 19:10
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., hanson, 19:04
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Gregory L. Hansen, 18:49
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 18:44
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 18:37
- Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?, Old Man, 18:32
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, platopes, 18:31
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bill Hobba, 18:29
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 18:28
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Bill Hobba, 18:15
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Bill Hobba, 18:11
- Re: New concept about expantion of the univers, CWatters, 18:11
- Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots, Gregory L. Hansen, 17:49
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 17:48
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Gregory L. Hansen, 17:47
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Paul B. Andersen, 17:46
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, hanson, 17:37
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Happy Hippy, 17:21
- Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?, LurfysMa, 17:09
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, Hero . van . Jindelt, 17:09
- Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?, LurfysMa, 17:05
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, AndyCav, 17:04
- Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots, Happy Hippy, 17:01
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Paul Mays, 16:56
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Paul Mays, 16:54
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Publius, 16:42
- Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots, Sam Wormley, 16:39
- Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots, PD, 16:34
- Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots, PD, 16:32
- Re: Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, brian a m stuckless, 16:28
- Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots, Happy Hippy, 16:26
- Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots, Sam Wormley, 16:18
- Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots, Mark Martin, 16:15
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Happy Hippy, 16:14
- LaLa Land with the QM Bots, Happy Hippy, 16:10
- Why The Universe Has Feedback 2: Tasker and Bryan 1 Dec 2005, OsherD, 16:04
- Re: Silicon Stress-Strain Curve ?, John Popelish, 15:44
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, PD, 15:41
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Robert Low, 15:38
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, PD, 15:34
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Don1, 15:21
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, T Wake, 15:12
- Re: G(o) R(oberts), Dirk Van de moortel, 15:10
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Mike, 15:01
- Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?, T Wake, 15:00
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Daryl McCullough, 14:59
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Mark Martin, 14:58
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Mike, 14:54
- Re: New concept about expantion of the univers, PD, 14:54
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 14:53
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Don1, 14:52
- Re: New concept about expantion of the univers, Sam Wormley, 14:51
- Re: String theory?, Mark Martin, 14:48
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:47
- Re: String theory?, T Wake, 14:45
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., odin, 14:45
- Re: New concept about expantion of the univers, Mike, 14:43
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 14:43
- Re: New concept about expantion of the univers, richard miller, 14:41
- Re: G(o) R(oberts), Mike, 14:35
- Re: G(o) R(oberts), Mike, 14:34
- Re: G(o) R(oberts), Mike, 14:33
- New concept about expantion of the univers, anani, 14:32
- Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?, Mark Martin, 14:29
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., surrealistic-dream, 14:21
- Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Traveler, 13:54
- Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?, Puppet_Sock, 13:52
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 13:43
- Re: Silicon Stress-Strain Curve ?, Puppet_Sock, 13:43
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:43
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:40
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, Puppet_Sock, 13:35
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:18
- Re: G(o) R(oberts), Eric Gisse, 13:12
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Eric Gisse, 13:06
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 13:05
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Igor, 13:04
- Re: G(o) R(oberts), Dirk Van de moortel, 12:53
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, briggs, 12:45
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Androcles, 12:07
- Silicon Stress-Strain Curve ?, deplifer, 11:36
- Re: rotational kinetic energy question?, PD, 11:33
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, PD, 11:28
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, PD, 11:27
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, David Thomson, 11:22
- Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime, Jay R. Yablon, 11:09
- Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?, Sam Wormley, 11:06
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, David Thomson, 11:02
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Paul Cardinale, 11:01
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Paul Cardinale, 11:00
- Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback, hanson, 10:58
- Re: Prove for Newton's mechanics, Andy Resnick, 10:55
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Don1, 10:46
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 10:46
- Why The Universe Has Feedback, OsherD, 10:43
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., PD, 10:41
- Did early universe expand faster than light?, LurfysMa, 10:39
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 10:36
- Re: G(o) R(oberts), Puppet_Sock, 10:33
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, PD, 10:33
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 10:08
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 10:08
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Mike, 10:07
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Sam Wormley, 10:07
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 10:05
- "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Doog, 10:04
- Re: rotational kinetic energy question?, Bruce Scott TOK, 10:04
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 10:02
- Re: G(o) R(oberts), Mike, 10:02
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, jmfbahciv, 09:58
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 09:53
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, tadchem, 09:51
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 09:45
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, jmfbahciv, 09:35
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, surrealistic-dream, 09:33
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, tadchem, 09:25
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, jem, 09:18
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, surrealistic-dream, 08:55
- Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet, Brad Guth, 08:44
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, slehar, 08:32
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 08:26
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, AndyCav, 08:11
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, AndyCav, 08:03
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, jesper pedersen, 07:52
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, minus, 07:46
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Autymn D. C., 07:38
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Don1, 07:35
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 07:22
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, jmfbahciv, 07:11
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 06:42
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, Harry, 06:40
- Re: 28 physics videos - hewitts conceptual physics, PT, 06:32
- Re: THE TERRIBLE PREDICAMENT OF THE FRAUDULOUS GEOLOGY, donstockbauer, 06:23
- Re: New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 05, 2005, donstockbauer, 06:14
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 05, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:40
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 05:12
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 05:03
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Bob Cain, 04:53
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Ken S. Tucker, 04:13
- 28 physics videos - hewitts conceptual physics, PT, 04:05
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bill Hobba, 03:39
- Re: rotational kinetic energy question?, Ken S. Tucker, 03:34
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 03:33
- Wormholes Without Exotic Matter, OsherD, 03:28
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, June R Harton, 03:25
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 02:28
- Feedback ByTwo-Phase One-Directional Differential Equations, OsherD, 01:30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:47
- Re: If Sir Isaac Newton Had Lived in India instead of the U.K...., OsherD, 00:38
- Re: First quantum byte!, Juuso Hukkanen, 00:36
- If Sir Isaac Newton Had Lived in India instead of the U.K...., OsherD, 00:21
- Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?, donstockbauer, 00:16
December 04, 2005
- Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?, tj Frazir, 23:54
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:53
- discrete physics as a neural network, andybmt, 23:48
- Re: Physics of 10^x Years, x = 1 to 5, OsherD, 23:47
- Re: Metallicity of stars, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:44
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Tom Roberts, 23:32
- Re: Physics of 10^x Years, x = 1 to 5, OsherD, 23:26
- Physics of 10^x Years, x = 1 to 5, OsherD, 23:10
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:02
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, donstockbauer, 23:00
- Re: G(o) R(oberts), Eric Gisse, 22:57
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Eric Gisse, 22:50
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 22:49
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 22:47
- Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?, jimp, 22:25
- Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?, Mark Martin, 22:22
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 22:18
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 22:17
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Randy Poe, 22:05
- Re: String theory?, ?, 22:05
- Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?, tj Frazir, 21:56
- Re: Metallicity of stars, JD, 21:42
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Paul Mays, 20:58
- Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet, Brad Guth, 20:35
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Don1, 20:31
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 20:16
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Sam Wormley, 20:01
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dastardly Fiend, 19:31
- Re: Metallicity of stars, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 19:24
- G(o) R(oberts), Mike, 19:09
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
- Re: rotational kinetic energy question?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 18:50
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bilge, 18:42
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bill Hobba, 18:19
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bill Hobba, 18:19
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Igor, 18:14
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 18:13
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Peter, 18:09
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, platopes, 17:55
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, platopes, 17:47
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:47
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 17:43
- Re: Metallicity of stars, Sam Wormley, 17:34
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Don1, 17:33
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:32
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Paul B. Andersen, 17:29
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 17:25
- Metallicity of stars, Conor, 16:24
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mathlete, 16:15
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Peter, 15:53
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Ken S. Tucker, 15:51
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., David Thomson, 15:51
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Eric Gisse, 15:50
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 15:50
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, jesper pedersen, 15:42
- Re: First quantum byte!, Mike Amling, 15:30
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Sam Wormley, 15:11
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, nasaiya, 15:09
- Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Don1, 15:03
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mathlete, 14:40
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Sam Wormley, 14:39
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Mike, 14:23
- Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 4: Central Core Radius vs Universe Radius, OsherD, 14:18
- Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Sam Wormley, 14:17
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:02
- Re: Math/Physics Software, David Thomson, 13:14
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 13:00
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:51
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dastardly Fiend, 12:37
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Steve Ralph, 12:33
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, hanson, 12:26
- Re: rotational kinetic energy question?, Bruce Scott TOK, 12:09
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Dirk Van de moortel, 12:05
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 11:59
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 11:58
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 11:44
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:39
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:32
- Re: Math/Physics Software, Matthew Lybanon, 11:27
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Steve Ralph, 11:24
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Vollane, 11:06
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Dastardly Fiend, 11:03
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Vollane, 11:02
- "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", X48, 10:43
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Randy Poe, 10:30
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, David Thomson, 10:12
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Peter, 10:12
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Sam Wormley, 10:09
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, David Thomson, 10:09
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:03
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 09:39
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, John Christiansen, 09:34
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., David Thomson, 09:07
- Who's to blame, ever... physical processes determine absolutely everything., Jeff_Relf, 08:52
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, jmfbahciv, 07:48
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, jmfbahciv, 07:45
- Re: Intelligent Design wake the dumbass, T Wake, 07:19
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Steve Ralph, 07:17
- Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE MANKIND!! ==> NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core, donstockbauer, 06:41
- Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE MANKIND!! ==> NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core, donstockbauer, 06:41
- Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE MANKIND!! ==> NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core, donstockbauer, 06:39
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 06:18
- Re: God#, glbrad01, 06:10
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Schoenfeld, 04:51
- Re: God#, glbrad01, 04:41
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 04:23
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 04:19
- Re: does surface system observe the 3rd law?, Ian Parker, 04:07
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, Y.Porat, 03:42
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Jean-Paul Turcaud, 03:27
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Bilge, 03:26
- Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 3: An Alternation of Radiation and Matter Influence, OsherD, 03:26
- Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 3: An Alternation of Radiation and Matter Influence, OsherD, 03:05
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:56
- **theory-edge** mailing list, vznuri, 02:43
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, hanson, 02:14
- Re: God#, Helmut Wabnig, 02:08
- does surface system observe the 3rd law?, vector, 01:42
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:40
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Autymn D. C., 01:18
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Dastardly Fiend, 00:59
- Re: F-u(w?/g)=fg; or why I use f=gm, instead of F=ma*g, Eric Gisse, 00:50
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, tj Frazir, 00:50
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, tj Frazir, 00:48
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, tj Frazir, 00:31
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 00:29
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 00:29
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 00:29
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 00:29
- Re: F-u(w?/g)=fg; or why I use f=gm, instead of F=ma*g, tj Frazir, 00:28
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:25
- Re: What a MISS, SIR Isaac Newton SIR!!, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:20
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:05
- Re: God#, Helmut Wabnig, 00:02
December 03, 2005
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Eric Gisse, 23:56
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, nasaiya, 23:02
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, mmeron, 22:45
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, hanson, 22:33
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Autymn D. C., 22:21
- Re: Intelligent Design wake the dumbass, tj Frazir, 22:19
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, magic math tricks, 22:17
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 21:35
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, hanson, 21:27
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, brian a m stuckless, 21:13
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 21:03
- Re: Quick question about air pressure, The Ghost In The Machine, 21:00
- Re: Quick question about air pressure, John Popelish, 20:09
- Re: Are Gas Mantles Thermoluminescent or something else?, donald haarmann, 19:50
- Re: What a MISS, SIR Isaac Newton SIR!!, john_ramsden, 19:50
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bill Hobba, 19:40
- Math/Physics Software, Chris Scott, 19:36
- Re: Errors in the "The Big Bang Never Happened", Mark Martin, 19:33
- Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 2, donstockbauer, 19:28
- Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?, Wai Yu Wong, 19:25
- Re: THE FRAUD OF TRUE GEOLOGY AND THE LONE BELIEVER, donstockbauer, 19:24
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, RyanT, 19:02
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Mark Martin, 18:48
- Re: Quick question about air pressure, Gregory L. Hansen, 18:28
- Prove for Newton's mechanics, dedanoe, 18:26
- Re: What a MISS, SIR Isaac Newton SIR!!, dedanoe, 18:23
- Quick question about air pressure, ngdbud, 18:22
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:07
- Re: Dirk Van de moortel and the most immortal fumble of them all, glbrad01, 17:53
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, mmeron, 17:50
- Re: Are Gas Mantles Thermoluminescent or something else?, salmonegg, 17:34
- Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 2, Happy Hippy, 17:31
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, Gregory L. Hansen, 17:26
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:12
- Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 2, OsherD, 17:11
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Ken S. Tucker, 17:10
- Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?, Sam Wormley, 17:06
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, jowr . pi, 17:03
- Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 2, OsherD, 17:02
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, brian a m stuckless, 17:01
- Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?, Sam Wormley, 16:59
- Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?, Wai Yu Wong, 16:52
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Bill Hobba, 16:52
- Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?, Wai Yu Wong, 16:46
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bill Hobba, 16:40
- Question about multiple colisions in HS (hard sphere) model, altamente, 16:36
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Sam Wormley, 16:32
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Ken S. Tucker, 16:28
- Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 2, OsherD, 16:04
- Re: We Know, The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, FrediFizzx, 15:56
- Re: God#, donstockbauer, 14:58
- God#, John Bailo, 14:51
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Mike, 14:45
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Traveler, 14:45
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, Don1, 14:41
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Mike, 14:39
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Autymn D. C., 14:38
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Timo Nieminen, 14:35
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Mike, 14:30
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Autymn D. C., 14:26
- We Know, John Bailo, 14:24
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, surrealistic-dream, 14:23
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, nasaiya, 14:20
- Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite", OsherD, 14:06
- Errors in the "The Big Bang Never Happened", Sam Wormley, 14:01
- Re: Are Gas Mantles Thermoluminescent or something else?, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, John Bailey, 13:59
- Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite", OsherD, 13:55
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Vollane, 13:45
- Linux is not a retail product., Jeff_Relf, 13:45
- Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet, Brad Guth, 13:44
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Ken S. Tucker, 13:39
- Quantum physics study - Where to begin?, nasaiya, 13:36
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Traveler, 13:34
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Autymn D. C., 13:34
- Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma, jowr . pi, 13:26
- Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite", OsherD, 13:25
- Re: Are Gas Mantles Thermoluminescent or something else?, Mark Thorson, 13:24
- Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:24
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Schoenfeld, 13:00
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Sam Wormley, 12:57
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Schoenfeld, 12:50
- Re: Discovering a greater cosmos and dwarfing Darwin's Theory_of_Evolution., John Bailo, 12:35
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 12:33
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Sam Wormley, 12:25
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, rangermccoy, 12:20
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Schoenfeld, 12:18
- Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, jaska, 12:09
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Traveler, 11:56
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Sam Wormley, 11:49
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Dastardly Fiend, 11:49
- Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite", OsherD, 11:37
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Schoenfeld, 11:31
- Re: December 2005 Scientific American article, David Thomson, 11:26
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Sam Wormley, 11:24
- Re: Jagdish Chandra Bose should have jointly received the 1909 Nobel Prize for the discovery of wireless telegraphy, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 11:24
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Dastardly Fiend, 11:19
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Schoenfeld, 11:17
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Sam Wormley, 11:16
- Re: Discovering a greater cosmos and dwarfing Darwin's Theory_of_Evolution., Mark Martin, 11:15
- Re: An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Dirk Van de moortel, 11:14
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Sam Wormley, 11:14
- An attempt at a definition of "rest relative to space"., Peter, 11:10
- Re: Discovering a greater cosmos and dwarfing Darwin's Theory_of_Evolution., Jeff_Relf, 11:09
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, Mark Martin, 11:08
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Sam Wormley, 11:08
- Re: Dirk Van de moortel and the most immortal fumble of them all, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:04
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:04
- SimSun Unicode., Jeff_Relf, 11:00
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:59
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, hanson, 10:56
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:54
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Mike, 10:50
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Schoenfeld, 10:47
- Re: Discovering a greater cosmos and dwarfing Darwin's Theory_of_Evolution., Mark Martin, 10:45
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, rusmann, 10:40
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science, Mike, 10:39
- Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Sam Wormley, 10:37
- "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", X48, 10:36
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Schoenfeld, 10:32