sci.physics (thread)

jumping on a trampoline with spring arcs on your feet, ik, 2005/11/30
Paper: Creation of a six-atom 'Schrödinger cat' state, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/11/30
Saturn's moon reveals its secrets, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/30
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 756 November 30, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/30
R.Feymann & the String Theory, Thierry Mella, 2005/11/30
- Re: R.Feymann & the String Theory, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/30
- Re: R.Feymann & the String Theory, Mark Martin, 2005/11/30
"The Matter of "Dark Matter", X84, 2005/11/30
- Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/30
Acquiring papers, Tolman, 2005/11/30
- Re: Acquiring papers, tadchem, 2005/11/30
old papers, David Macmanus, 2005/11/30
- Re: old papers, Matthew Lybanon, 2005/11/30
  - Re: old papers, David Macmanus, 2005/11/30
Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Don1, 2005/11/30
- Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/30
- Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/30
  - Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Don1, 2005/11/30
    - Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Don1, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Steve Ralph, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Randy Poe, 2005/11/30
- Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/30
What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, GSS, 2005/11/30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, tadchem, 2005/11/30
  - Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/30
  - Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Androcles, 2005/11/30
    - Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/30
  - Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Peter, 2005/11/30
    - Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, tadchem, 2005/11/30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Peter, 2005/11/30
  - Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/30
  - Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, surrealistic-dream, 2005/11/30
    - Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Peter, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/30
  - Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, GSS, 2005/11/30
    - Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/30
    - Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Peter, 2005/11/30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sue..., 2005/11/30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, surrealistic-dream, 2005/11/30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, jpolasek, 2005/11/30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Old Man, 2005/11/30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/30
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/30
  - Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/30
The Generalised Born Postulate, Zinc Potterman, 2005/11/30
Uncountably Many Outside Universes As Modified Multiverses, OsherD, 2005/11/30
THE MECHANISM, Kevan, 2005/11/30
- Re: THE MECHANISM, R. Pierce Butler, 2005/11/30
  - Re: THE MECHANISM, donstockbauer, 2005/11/30
Re: energy derived from differential specific gravities?, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/30
- Re: energy derived from differential specific gravities?, barry, 2005/11/30
Origin of forces, Peter, 2005/11/29
- Re: Origin of forces, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/29
- Message not available
  - Re: Origin of forces, RP, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Origin of forces, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Origin of forces, Y.Porat, 2005/11/30
    - Re: Origin of forces, Peter, 2005/11/30
- Re: Origin of forces, Androcles, 2005/11/30
- Re: Origin of forces, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/30
  - Re: Origin of forces, Peter, 2005/11/30
  - Re: Origin of forces, Y.Porat, 2005/11/30
  - Re: Origin of forces, mmeron, 2005/11/30
Debate on time travel paradoxes, Jack Sarfatti, 2005/11/29
- Re: Debate on time travel paradoxes, Twittering One, 2005/11/29
  - Re: Debate on time travel paradoxes, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
- Re: Debate on time travel paradoxes, OsherD, 2005/11/30
  - Re: Debate on time travel paradoxes, ianparker2, 2005/11/30
Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 2005/11/29
- Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 2005/11/29
- Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, tj Frazir, 2005/11/29
  - Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 2005/11/30
    - Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 2005/11/30
UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, rem460, 2005/11/29
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, Mark Martin, 2005/11/29
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, Bruce Sinclair, 2005/11/29
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, John Clark, 2005/11/29
  - Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, Androcles, 2005/11/30
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, salmonegg, 2005/11/30
  - Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, Lloyd Parker, 2005/11/30
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, Lloyd Parker, 2005/11/30
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/30
Energy In The Knowledge Equation 9: Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 2005/11/29
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 9: Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 2005/11/29
Re: Amount of light from linear floodlamp bulb, tj Frazir, 2005/11/29
"Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", X84, 2005/11/29
- Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/29
Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
- Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????, Mark Martin, 2005/11/29
  - Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
    - Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????, Mark Martin, 2005/11/29
Re: FORCE OF GRAVITY IS AN ILLUSION, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
Re: There has never been an earthquake on Thanksgiving, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, nebula331, 2005/11/29
- Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, Androcles, 2005/11/29
  - Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, Doug, 2005/11/29
- Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, Mark Martin, 2005/11/29
- Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
- Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, tadchem, 2005/11/29
I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
- Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
  - Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
    - Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: I LOVE YOU, Dogma Discharge, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: I LOVE YOU, tadchem, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: I LOVE YOU, Mark-T, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: I LOVE YOU, Randy Poe, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: I LOVE YOU, tadchem, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: I LOVE YOU, Androcles, 2005/11/30
- Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
Re: The Caliber of Debunkers Is Waning, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, G.L. Cross, 2005/11/29
- Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, CWatters, 2005/11/29
- Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, PD, 2005/11/29
- Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, tadchem, 2005/11/29
  - Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, tadchem, 2005/11/29
Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Hubble, 2005/11/29
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, CWatters, 2005/11/29
  - Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Hubble, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, CWatters, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, tj Frazir, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Samsong, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Hubble, 2005/11/30
    - Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, tj Frazir, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Old Man, 2005/11/29
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, tadchem, 2005/11/29
  - Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, CWatters, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, tadchem, 2005/11/30
Magnetic field problem, (a proof of uniqueness of field potential), Harry, 2005/11/29
- Re: Magnetic field problem, (a proof of uniqueness of field potential), Old Man, 2005/11/29
What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 2005/11/29
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/29
  - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/29
    - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 2005/11/29
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker, 2005/11/29
  - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 2005/11/29
    - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker, 2005/11/30
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/29
  - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 2005/11/29
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Old Man, 2005/11/29
  - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 2005/11/29
    - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Old Man, 2005/11/30
  - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/29
    - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 2005/11/30
    - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/29
    - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Old Man, 2005/11/30
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/29
  - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 2005/11/30
    - Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 2005/11/30
Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD, 2005/11/29
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD, 2005/11/29
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD, 2005/11/29
  - Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD, 2005/11/29
Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/29
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/29
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/29
  - Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/30
    - Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Androcles, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2005/11/30
  - Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/30
    - Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/30
  - Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Richard Schultz, 2005/11/30
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/30
Toroids, Greg G, 2005/11/28
- Re: Toroids, John Popelish, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Toroids, g, 2005/11/30
    - Re: Toroids, mmeron, 2005/11/30
- Re: Toroids, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/29
  - Re: Toroids, Androcles, 2005/11/30
- Re: Toroids, mmeron, 2005/11/29
- Re: Toroids, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/29
  - Re: Toroids, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Toroids, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/29
Nick Herbert's critique of Ray Jensen's FTL signal idea, Jack Sarfatti, 2005/11/28
New theory vs. Big Bang, jaska, 2005/11/28
- Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, ianparker2, 2005/11/29
  - Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, jaska, 2005/11/29
    - Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, Ian Parker, 2005/11/30
Energy in the Knowledge Equation 7: Matter, Radiation, etc., OsherD, 2005/11/28
- Re: Energy in the Knowledge Equation 7: Matter, Radiation, etc., OsherD, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Energy in the Knowledge Equation 7: Matter, Radiation, etc., OsherD, 2005/11/28
EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, ACE, 2005/11/28
- Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, Tice with a J, 2005/11/28
  - Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/28
    - Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, Tice with a J, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/28
- Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, ?, 2005/11/29
  - Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
DOE Sensitive Subjects, righton20052, 2005/11/28
- Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, Doug, 2005/11/28
- Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, Randy Poe, 2005/11/28
  - Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, tadchem, 2005/11/28
    - Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, tj Frazir, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, Doug, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, hanson, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, tj Frazir, 2005/11/29
- Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, Androcles, 2005/11/28
"Examining Mathematical Approaches", X84, 2005/11/28
- Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/28
On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 2005/11/28
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/28
  - Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 2005/11/29
    - Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 2005/11/29
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/28
Energy In The Knowledge Equation 6: Baez and Neumaier, OsherD, 2005/11/28
What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glom_On., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/28
- Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glom_On., Thomas Wootten, 2005/11/28
  - Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glom_On., Mark Martin, 2005/11/28
  - Why I included Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/28
  - Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glo..., tj Frazir, 2005/11/29
- Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glom_On., John Bailo, 2005/11/28
  - Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glom_On., donstockbauer, 2005/11/28
  - Discovering a greater cosmos and dwarfing Darwin's Theory_of_Evolution., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Discovering a greater cosmos and dwarfing Darwin's Theory_of_Evolution., Mark Martin, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Discovering a greater cosmos and dwarfing Darwin's Theory_of_Evolution., chrisv, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Discovering a greater cosmos and dwarfing Darwin's Theory_of_Evolution., Thomas Wootten, 2005/11/29
Relativistic computation, Ian Macmillan, 2005/11/28
- Re: Relativistic computation, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/28
- Re: Relativistic computation, zinnic, 2005/11/28
- Re: Relativistic computation, Dr Photon, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Relativistic computation, Dr Photon, 2005/11/29
- Re: Relativistic computation, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/28
- Re: Relativistic computation, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Relativistic computation, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/29
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 28, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2005/11/28
help!i don't know its name., vector, 2005/11/28
- Re: help!i don't know its name., Brit, 2005/11/28
  - Re: help!i don't know its name., tadchem, 2005/11/28
Scientific error from observation, deloid, 2005/11/27
- Re: Scientific error from observation, ?, 2005/11/27
- Re: Scientific error from observation, Androcles, 2005/11/28
- Re: Scientific error from observation, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/28
Nick Herbert & Jack Sarfatti agree about the physics of Jensen's FTL idea - it doesn't work, Jack Sarfatti, 2005/11/27
About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Kwok Man Hui, 2005/11/27
- Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/28
- Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Peter, 2005/11/28
  - Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/28
    - Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Peter, 2005/11/29
Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5.2 Bose and Dadhich 1999, OsherD, 2005/11/27
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5.2 Bose and Dadhich 1999, OsherD, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5.2 Bose and Dadhich 1999, Androcles, 2005/11/28
Did Nick Herbert find an error in Ray Jensen's FTL EPR Signal Device?, Jack Sarfatti, 2005/11/27
- Re: Did Nick Herbert find an error in Ray Jensen's FTL EPR Signal Device?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/28
Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson, 2005/11/27
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, hhc314, 2005/11/27
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Randy Poe, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson, 2005/11/27
    - Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Ken Muldrew, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Ken Muldrew, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Randy Poe, 2005/11/28
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Androcles, 2005/11/27
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson, 2005/11/28
    - Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Randy Poe, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/29
Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500, 2005/11/27
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, R. Pierce Butler, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Androcles, 2005/11/27
    - Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, donstockbauer, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Androcles, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Randy Poe, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Randy Poe, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, arvee, 2005/11/28
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500, 2005/11/27
    - Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/27
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Androcles, 2005/11/27
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Mike, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/28
    - Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Mike, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Mike, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, PD, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, R. Pierce Butler, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Androcles, 2005/11/29
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/28
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, PD, 2005/11/28
String theory?, ?, 2005/11/27
- Re: String theory?, T Wake, 2005/11/27
- Re: String theory?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/28
  - Re: String theory?, ?, 2005/11/28
    - Re: String theory?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/28
- Re: String theory?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
Singularities are ALL naked, ?, 2005/11/27
- Re: Singularities are ALL naked, Mark Martin, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Singularities are ALL naked, donstockbauer, 2005/11/27
    - Re: Singularities are ALL naked, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Singularities are ALL naked, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Singularities are ALL naked, Androcles, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Singularities are ALL naked, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Singularities are ALL naked, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/30
Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?, Robert, 2005/11/27
- Re: Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?, R. Pierce Butler, 2005/11/27
- Re: Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?, Androcles, 2005/11/27
Faster Than Light Quantum Signal Nonlocality?, Jack Sarfatti, 2005/11/27
Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5:1 Carlip, OsherD, 2005/11/27
Re: Are protons really quantum black holes?, hanson, 2005/11/27
String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, jollyrogership, 2005/11/27
- Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, RicS, 2005/11/27
- Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, vanep, 2005/11/27
- Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, vanep, 2005/11/27
  - Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, drelliot, 2005/11/28
    - Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/28
- Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/29
- Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, Thomas Heger, 2005/11/29
On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, jollyrogership, 2005/11/27
- Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, jollyrogership, 2005/11/27
  - Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, looter, 2005/11/27
    - Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, jollyrogership, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, looter, 2005/11/27
- Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/27
- Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/27
- Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/28
  - Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, drelliot, 2005/11/28
"The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Tsom, 2005/11/27
- Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/27
- Spam - Re - "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/27
- Message not available
  - Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Androcles, 2005/11/27
photon size, Bernhard Kuemel, 2005/11/27
- Re: photon size, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/27
- Re: photon size, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/27
  - Re: photon size, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/27
    - Re: photon size, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: photon size, Hero . van . Jindelt, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: photon size, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
  - Re: photon size, tj Frazir, 2005/11/29
- Re: photon size, Old Man, 2005/11/27
  - Re: photon size, ?, 2005/11/27
  - Re: photon size: correction, Old Man, 2005/11/28
- Re: photon size, Strongheart, 2005/11/28
Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/27
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/27
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Double-A, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/27
    - Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/27
    - Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Double-A, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, tadchem, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Steve Ralph, 2005/11/27
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Richard Tobin, 2005/11/27
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Clemens W, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/28
    - Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Clemens W, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Proginoskes, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, tadchem, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, PD, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Paul Cardinale, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, tadchem, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, hanson, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Clemens W, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Clemens W, 2005/11/29
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/29
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Mark-T, 2005/11/29
  - Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/29
    - Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, David Kastrup, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Mark-T, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, David Kastrup, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 2005/11/29
Sacred geometry and physics, Jimmy, 2005/11/27
- Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Androcles, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Jimmy, 2005/11/27
    - Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Androcles, 2005/11/27
- Re: Sacred geometry and physics, John Christiansen, 2005/11/27
- Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/27
- Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/27
- Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Al Zenner, 2005/11/27
THE FORCE OF GRAVITYU IS AN ILLUSION, ACE, 2005/11/27
- Re: THE FORCE OF GRAVITYU IS AN ILLUSION, donstockbauer, 2005/11/27
Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5: sci.physics.research on Fundamental Nature of Energy, OsherD, 2005/11/27
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5: sci.physics.research on Fundamental Nature of Energy, Androcles, 2005/11/27
A little reminder abot anold troll, Segin, 2005/11/27
- Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, mmeron, 2005/11/27
  - Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, donstockbauer, 2005/11/27
    - Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Segin, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Androcles, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Segin, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Androcles, 2005/11/30
- Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Androcles, 2005/11/27
- Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/27
Re: Conversion of Initiated Relativists Is Almost Completed, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/27
Richard Feynman, Murray Gell-Mann in Feynman's Rainbow & Metric Elasticity of Andrei Sakharov, Jack Sarfatti, 2005/11/27
Desktop Railgun, Singapura99, 2005/11/26
- Re: Desktop Railgun, hhc314, 2005/11/26
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Desktop Railgun, hhc314, 2005/11/27
    - Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/28
    - Re: Desktop Railgun, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, Singapura99, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, tj Frazir, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, tj Frazir, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, panteltje, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, donstockbauer, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, tadchem, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, Singapura99, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Desktop Railgun, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/29
- Re: Desktop Railgun, CWatters, 2005/11/27
Major problems of Modern Physics, djlockdown, 2005/11/26
- Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/26
  - Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/27
- Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, Androcles, 2005/11/27
- Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, Old Man, 2005/11/27
Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, Mathlete, 2005/11/26
- Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/26
- Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, carlip-nospam, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, richard miller, 2005/11/28
    - Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, carlip-nospam, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, Mathlete, 2005/11/29
- Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/29
Hi, guys., donstockbauer, 2005/11/26
- Re: Hi, guys., hhc314, 2005/11/26
  - Re: Hi, guys., Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/26
    - Re: Hi, guys., mmeron, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Hi, guys., Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Hi, guys., mmeron, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Hi, guys., hhc314, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Hi, guys., mmeron, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Hi, guys., hhc314, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Hi, guys., mmeron, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Hi, guys., jmfbahciv, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Hi, guys., hhc314, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Hi, guys., jmfbahciv, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Hi, guys., mmeron, 2005/11/27
AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, hawk, 2005/11/26
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/26
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, RL Gerl, 2005/11/26
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, tadchem, 2005/11/26
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/27
  - Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/27
    - Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, hawk, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/28
  - Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, ?, 2005/11/27
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, Old Man, 2005/11/27
  - Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/27
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/27
Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism, donstockbauer, 2005/11/26
- Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/26
Article: On Atom Waves, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/11/26
- Re: Article: On Atom Waves, Androcles, 2005/11/26
Extra Space Dimensions & Casimir Force Data, Jack Sarfatti, 2005/11/26
Years Of Posts Made About The Smart Model Shown...., S. Enterprize Company, 2005/11/26
- Years Of Posts Made About The Smart Model Shown...., S. Enterprize Company, 2005/11/26
test to see if new topics are being accepted, donstockbauer, 2005/11/26
The Smart Model Theory Website, S. Enterprize Company, 2005/11/26
- Re: The Smart Model Theory Website, Androcles, 2005/11/26
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 25 Nov 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/26
"The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Tsom, 2005/11/26
- Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/26
  - Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", hhc314, 2005/11/26
    - Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/26
CLEAN & ELEGANT arithmetic., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/26
Photon-particles-observed, S. Enterprize Company, 2005/11/26
- Re: Photon-particles-observed, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/26
- Re: Photon-particles-observed, Androcles, 2005/11/26
The Smart Model - (Under The Guidance Of The Father ( The Creator)), S. Enterprize Company, 2005/11/26
- Re: The Smart Model - (Under The Guidance Of The Father ( The Creator)), Sam Wormley, 2005/11/26
  - Re: The Smart Model - (Under The Guidance Of The Father ( The Creator)), Parrot Milk, 2005/11/26
molecule to gather small groups of atoms and drop them, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/26
Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD, 2005/11/25
- Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD, 2005/11/26
  - Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, Androcles, 2005/11/26
    - Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, Androcles, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, Androcles, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, Androcles, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD, 2005/11/27
How to measure H (magnetic field strength)?, muknot, 2005/11/25
- Re: How to measure H (magnetic field strength)?, Androcles, 2005/11/26
- Re: How to measure H (magnetic field strength)?, jpolasek, 2005/11/26
Can anybody put together a hypersphere mathematically?, ?, 2005/11/25
Re: Particle Radii, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/25
- Re: Particle Radii, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/25
STOP there ..at the HUP-emitter, duh.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/25
- Re: Layman ruminations on quantum mechanics, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/11/27
Intriguing Reading, edconrad, 2005/11/25
- Re: Intriguing Reading, Freedom Fighter, 2005/11/25
Re: Save your world, R. Pierce Butler, 2005/11/25
Physics Book for AS Level, Panther, 2005/11/25
Velocity vector Magnitude & Direction, v., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/25
Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, slehar, 2005/11/25
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/25
  - Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/25
  - Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, slehar, 2005/11/30
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/25
  - Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/25
  - Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, slehar, 2005/11/30
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Old Man, 2005/11/25
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Peter, 2005/11/26
"The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Tsom, 2005/11/25
- Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/25
The Fastest Relativistic Jets: VLBA Observations of Blazars with Apparent Speeds Exceeding 25c, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/25
- Re: The Fastest Relativistic Jets: VLBA Observations of Blazars with Apparent Speeds Exceeding 25c, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/27
Nanotube foams are strong and flexible, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/25
Tiny swimmer makes a splash, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/25
String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, jollyrogership, 2005/11/25
Energy In The Knowledge Equation 3: The Brazilian Fermion Equations, OsherD, 2005/11/25
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 3: The Brazilian Fermion Equations, OsherD, 2005/11/25
  - Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 3: The Brazilian Fermion Equations, OsherD, 2005/11/25
fluid dynamics question, metro414, 2005/11/25
- Re: fluid dynamics question, Rene Tschaggelar, 2005/11/26
Energy In The Knowledge Equation 2: The Brazilians on Fermions, OsherD, 2005/11/25
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 2: The Brazilians on Fermions, OsherD, 2005/11/25
Covariant Volume Integration and Stokes' / Gauss' Theorem in Curved Spacetime, Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/24
Fusion, Physitrex, 2005/11/24
- Re: Fusion, Mark Martin, 2005/11/25
- Re: Fusion, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/25
- Re: Fusion, Old Man, 2005/11/25
Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Old Man, 2005/11/24
- Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Androcles, 2005/11/25
  - Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/25
    - Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/29
  - Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/25
  - Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/29
Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Michael Ejercito, 2005/11/24
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 2005/11/24
  - Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Michael Ejercito, 2005/11/25
    - Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Greg Neill, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, donstockbauer, 2005/11/27
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Mark Martin, 2005/11/24
  - Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 2005/11/25
    - Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 2005/11/25
    - Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Mark Martin, 2005/11/25
  - Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/25
    - Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Michael Ejercito, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/26
  - Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/26
    - Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/27
    - Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 2005/11/28
Re: The magnetic radius of the electron, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/24
Mysterious Magnetic LENGTH lo, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/24
"How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Tleb, 2005/11/24
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Mark Martin, 2005/11/24
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/24
- Light is being pushed!!!, Nick, 2005/11/24
  - Re: Light is being pushed!!!, chris, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Light is being pushed!!!, Nick, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Light is being pushed!!!, Androcles, 2005/11/24
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", drelliot, 2005/11/25
  - Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Androcles, 2005/11/25
    - Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", donstockbauer, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", donstockbauer, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Matthew Lybanon, 2005/11/25
  - Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", don_stockbauer, 2005/11/26
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/25
FORCE OF GRAVITY IS AN IILLUSION, ACE, 2005/11/24
Light slower than CG?, ReGenesis0, 2005/11/24
- Re: Light slower than CG?, Brit, 2005/11/24
- Re: Light slower than CG?, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/24
  - Re: Light slower than CG?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
String Theory and "Beauty", mike3, 2005/11/23
- Message not available
  - Re: String Theory and "Beauty", Androcles, 2005/11/25
    - Re: String Theory and "Beauty", Bob Cain, 2005/11/27
- Re: String Theory and "Beauty", Juan R., 2005/11/27
Physicists have observed a feature known as a "pseudogap", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
- Re: Physicists have observed a feature known as a "pseudogap", tj Frazir, 2005/11/23
- Re: Physicists have observed a feature known as a "pseudogap", Mike Speed, 2005/11/24
All gravitational lenses possess the physic of lensing, glbrad01, 2005/11/23
- Re: All gravitational lenses possess the physic of lensing, Mark Martin, 2005/11/23
Superposition Information Highway, gary, 2005/11/23
- Re: Superposition Information Highway, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/23
Maxwell equations and plane waves, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/23
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, mmeron, 2005/11/23
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/23
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Androcles, 2005/11/23
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Josef Matz, 2005/11/24
  - Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Josef Matz, 2005/11/24
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, operator jay, 2005/11/24
  - Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, operator jay, 2005/11/25
DARK ENERGY AND THE PREPOSTEROUS UNIVERSE, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
- Re: DARK ENERGY AND THE PREPOSTEROUS UNIVERSE, Peter, 2005/11/24
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/23
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/25
  - Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223), Androcles, 2005/11/25
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223), Han de Bruijn, 2005/11/29
Electromagnetic Equation in to Numerical Form, Magnetics, 2005/11/23
What is Lens MTF Test and use it like an film emulsion, mustafa umut sarac, 2005/11/23
Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Jonathan Hoyle, 2005/11/23
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, PD, 2005/11/23
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Old Man, 2005/11/23
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Peter, 2005/11/24
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Nick, 2005/11/24
Mass and Energy Relationship, rds, 2005/11/23
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, rds, 2005/11/23
    - Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/25
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, TomGee, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, rds, 2005/11/23
    - Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
    - Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, TomGee, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, PD, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, rds, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Y.Porat, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Y.Porat, 2005/11/24
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Old Man, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, hanson, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Y.Porat, 2005/11/24
  - Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/24
  - Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, hanson, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/25
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, romirad2, 2005/11/24
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 755 November 23, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, edconrad, 2005/11/23
- Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, *The Commentator*, 2005/11/23
- Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, HenryBumstead, 2005/11/23
  - Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, mickg, 2005/11/24
    - Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, JimmyRigg, 2005/11/26
    - Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, John Griffin, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, JimmyRigg, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, John Griffin, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, JimmyRigg, 2005/11/29
- Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, Darkwing, 2005/11/25
  - Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, CWatters, 2005/11/26
    - Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, Darkwing, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, JimmyRigg, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, Darkwing, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, deadland, 2005/11/29
"The Paradox of Zeno", Tleb, 2005/11/23
- Re: "The Paradox of Zeno", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
$ All sub-SYSTEMs have "surroundings", duh. Sub-SYSTEMs are "submerged" in SYSTEM "working fluid" AMBiENT. Sub-SYSTEMs ONLY EXCHANGE energy with "working fluid" AMBiENT. Go-go Google GROUP SEARCH: < My BiGGER bang > ..My REAL STUFF. TOTAL LaGrangian h*f Dis-iNFORMATiON follows with Tom Roberts.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/23
- Re: $ All sub-SYSTEMs have "surroundings", duh. Sub-SYSTEMs are "submerged" in SYSTEM "working fluid" AMBiENT. Sub-SYSTEMs ONLY EXCHANGE energy with "working fluid" AMBiENT. Go-go Google GROUP SEARCH: < My BiGGER bang > ..My REAL STUFF. TOTAL LaGrangian h*f Dis-iNFORMATiON follows with Tom Roberts.!!, donstockbauer, 2005/11/23
Where am I ?, Physitrex, 2005/11/23
- Re: Where am I ?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/23
- Re: Where am I ?, PD, 2005/11/23
- Re: Where am I ?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
- Re: Where am I ?, tadchem, 2005/11/23
- Re: Where am I ?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/23
- Re: Where am I ?, wgilmour, 2005/11/23
- Re: Where am I ?, Old Man, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY, 2005/11/23
    - Re: Where am I ?, Old Man, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Where am I ?, Androcles, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Where am I ?, Old Man, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Where am I ?, Androcles, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Where am I ?, Androcles, 2005/11/26
  - Re: Where am I ?, hanson, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Where am I ?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Where am I ?, hanson, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Where am I ?, Old Man, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Where am I ?, Androcles, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Where am I ?, Old Man, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Where am I ?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Where am I ?, Old Man, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Where am I ?, Androcles, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 2005/11/29
Spacetime and matter, Physitrex, 2005/11/23
- Gravity is a glomming on, a type of consumption., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Gravity is a glomming on, a type of consumption., donstockbauer, 2005/11/23
- Re: Spacetime and matter, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
- Re: Spacetime and matter, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/23
- Re: Spacetime and matter, Mr Clarke, 2005/11/26
Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!, Philip Deitiker, 2005/11/23
- Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!, Androcles, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!, donstockbauer, 2005/11/23
Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/22
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, OsherD, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, OsherD, 2005/11/23
    - Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Nick, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, OsherD, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Nick, 2005/11/25
  - Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/23
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/23
    - Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, OsherD, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Androcles, 2005/11/26
    - Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/26
    - Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/27
Energy In The Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/22
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/23
Simple Classical Mechanics Problem, btevans, 2005/11/22
- Re: Simple Classical Mechanics Problem, Tice with a J, 2005/11/22
- Re: Simple Classical Mechanics Problem, mmeron, 2005/11/22
- Re: Simple Classical Mechanics Problem, Old Man, 2005/11/23
Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 2005/11/22
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/22
  - Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 2005/11/22
    - Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Bob Cain, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 2005/11/24
  - Message not available
    - Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 2005/11/22
Re: OT: Are protons really quantum black holes?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/22
Gravity Explained!, junoexpress, 2005/11/22
- Re: Gravity Explained!, wgilmour, 2005/11/22
  - Re: Gravity Explained!, Pelastration, 2005/11/22
    - Re: Gravity Explained!, Pelastration, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Gravity Explained!, Mr Clarke, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Gravity Explained!, Physitrex, 2005/11/26
- Re: Gravity Explained!, erik . lentz, 2005/11/28
REAL ALCHEMY For BIOLOGY, rem460, 2005/11/22
- Re: REAL ALCHEMY For BIOLOGY, onehappymadman, 2005/11/22
- Re: REAL ALCHEMY For BIOLOGY, Farooq W, 2005/11/22
- Re: REAL ALCHEMY For BIOLOGY, Richard Schultz, 2005/11/23
Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/22
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/22
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/22
  - Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/22
    - Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/22
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bob Cain, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Nick, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sue..., 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sue..., 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Henry Haapalainen, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, snapdragon31, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bob Cain, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, surrealistic-dream, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, snapdragon31, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, surrealistic-dream, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, surrealistic-dream, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Androcles, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Nick, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, drelliot, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Nick, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Al Zenner, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mathlete, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sue..., 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Henry Haapalainen, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, fart, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Neil G, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mathlete, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mathlete, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, jem, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Androcles, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Androcles, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, PD, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Androcles, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mathlete, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Al Zenner, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, jollyrogership, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Androcles, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Al Zenner, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 2005/11/23
    - Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, drelliot, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, jollyrogership, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/28
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, PD, 2005/11/28
eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum, rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/22
- Re: eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum, Greg Neill, 2005/11/22
  - Re: eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum, rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/22
    - Re: eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum, Tice with a J, 2005/11/22
Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), PD, 2005/11/22
- Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/23
- Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/22
  - Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), jmfbahciv, 2005/11/23
NATURE doesn't care we have coherent GUESS iSS STANDARDs., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/22
Re: Search engines - Help me! The internet is full of crap!, bae, 2005/11/22
Measure the state of quantum bits in a quantum computer without disturbing the state, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/22
- Re: Measure the state of quantum bits in a quantum computer without disturbing the state, Bob Cain, 2005/11/22
  - Re: Measure the state of quantum bits in a quantum computer without disturbing the state, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/29
Accuracy vs. Relevance, I.Vecchi, 2005/11/22
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance (bayes versus frequentists), Googlety Glop, 2005/11/23
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, donstockbauer, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, tadchem, 2005/11/23
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Juan R., 2005/11/24
  - Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, tadchem, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Juan R., 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Juan R., 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/27
A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Tleb, 2005/11/22
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/22
Call for paper in Nanotechnology journal, Nano, 2005/11/22
Multiple gamma peaks for same radionuclide, Hannes Nagel, 2005/11/22
- Re: Multiple gamma peaks for same radionuclide, Old Man, 2005/11/22
help - how do i calculate this?, R. Pierce Butler, 2005/11/22
- Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Androcles, 2005/11/22
- Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/22
  - Re: help - how do i calculate this?, CWatters, 2005/11/22
    - Re: help - how do i calculate this?, R. Pierce Butler, 2005/11/22
  - Re: help - how do i calculate this?, R. Pierce Butler, 2005/11/22
- Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Old Man, 2005/11/22
  - Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Androcles, 2005/11/22
Theoretical help, natjbrown, 2005/11/22
- Re: Theoretical help, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/22
- Re: Theoretical help, PD, 2005/11/22
- Re: Theoretical help, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/22
  - Re: Theoretical help, PD, 2005/11/22
- Re: Theoretical help, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/24
Re: Two-Billion-Year-Old Surprise Found Beneath The Azores, cnctut, 2005/11/22
from the poles to the equator, Don1, 2005/11/21
- Re: from the poles to the equator, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/21
  - Re: from the poles to the equator, Doug, 2005/11/22
- Re: from the poles to the equator, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/22
- Re: from the poles to the equator, Clemens W, 2005/11/22
  - Re: from the poles to the equator, Don1, 2005/11/22
    - Re: from the poles to the equator, Clemens W, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: from the poles to the equator, Dik T. Winter, 2005/11/23
Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD, 2005/11/21
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, donstockbauer, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, LEFTY, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, LEFTY, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD, 2005/11/23
      
      You just can't study nothing !, Once again, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: You just can't study nothing !, OsherD, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: You just can't study nothing !, LEFTY, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: You just can't study nothing !, OsherD, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: You just can't study nothing !, Don't ever approach me, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: You just can't study nothing !, Nick, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: You just can't study nothing !, LEFTY, 2005/11/23
Theory of the day, Physitrex, 2005/11/21
- Re: Theory of the day, Physitrex, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Theory of the day, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Theory of the day, donstockbauer, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Theory of the day, Old Man, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Theory of the day, Physitrex, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Theory of the day, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Theory of the day, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Theory of the day, Old Man, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Theory of the day, Physitrex, 2005/11/23
Article: Staff 'crisis' threatens physics, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/11/21
- Re: Article: Staff 'crisis' threatens physics, Androcles, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Article: Staff 'crisis' threatens physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/21
Question from reporter, dru . sefton, 2005/11/21
- Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Question from reporter, Igor, 2005/11/22
    - Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Question from reporter, Once again, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Question from reporter, Don't ever approach me, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Question from reporter, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/30
    - Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/22
  - Re: Question from reporter, PD, 2005/11/22
    - Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Question from reporter, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Question from reporter, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Question from reporter, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/26
- Re: Question from reporter, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Question from reporter, tadchem, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Question from reporter, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Question from reporter, PD, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Question from reporter, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Question from reporter, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Question from reporter, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Question from reporter, dru . sefton, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Question from reporter, dru . sefton, 2005/11/21
- Re: Question from reporter, Androcles, 2005/11/21
- Re: Question from reporter, Aetherist, 2005/11/21
- Re: Question from reporter, cnctut, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Question from reporter, donstockbauer, 2005/11/21
- Re: Question from reporter, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/21
- Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/22
  - Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/22
    - Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/22
  - Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/22
    - Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/23
Help with Navier Stokes, C_B_Trail, 2005/11/21
- Re: Help with Navier Stokes, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/21
Grainy space for Lorentz-transformations, pekka . virtanen, 2005/11/21
- Re: Grainy space for Lorentz-transformations, tadchem, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Grainy space for Lorentz-transformations, pekka . virtanen, 2005/11/22
"The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", Tleb, 2005/11/21
- Re: "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/21
  - Re: "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", donstockbauer, 2005/11/21
eprint citations with bibtex, John F, 2005/11/21
- Re: eprint citations with bibtex, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/21
  - Re: eprint citations with bibtex, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/11/23
    - Re: eprint citations with bibtex, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/23
Universe Does Have An "Outside" 4: Universe Acceleration = Internal Pointer + External Pull, OsherD, 2005/11/21
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 4: Universe Acceleration = Internal Pointer + External Pull, OsherD, 2005/11/21
Zone Plate or Pin Sieves shaped for anamorphic image compression, mustafa umut sarac, 2005/11/21
- Re: Zone Plate or Pin Sieves shaped for anamorphic image compression, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/24
voltage vs current, krishna, 2005/11/21
- Re: voltage vs current, Androcles, 2005/11/21
  - Re: voltage vs current, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/21
- Re: voltage vs current, Doug, 2005/11/21
- Re: voltage vs current, John Popelish, 2005/11/21
- Re: voltage vs current, CWatters, 2005/11/21
  - Re: voltage vs current, krishna, 2005/11/22
SINGULAR DYNAMICS OF ONE-D-DOUBLE-U, dedanoe, 2005/11/21
Frame dragging experiments ???, Robert Finch, 2005/11/21
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, donstockbauer, 2005/11/21
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/21
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Physitrex, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Old Man, 2005/11/21
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Old Man, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, richard miller, 2005/11/22
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, franklinhu, 2005/11/24
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 21, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2005/11/21
- Re: New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 21, 2005, donstockbauer, 2005/11/21
Mpegs for presentation, Homer500, 2005/11/21
- Re: Mpegs for presentation, Mark Jones, 2005/11/21
- Re: Mpegs for presentation, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/22
  - Re: Mpegs for presentation, Androcles, 2005/11/22
EXHiBiT VELOCiTY & SPEED of light ..for DiFFERENT particle COUNTs.!! EXHiBiT ERROR-BARs for ALL "in-vacu" PARTiCLE-COUNTs, Cracked-pot.!! Many DiFFERENT particle-COUNTs *NOT* different SiTUATiONs, Dimwit.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/21
- Re: EXHiBiT VELOCiTY & SPEED of light ..for DiFFERENT particle COUNTs.!! EXHiBiT ERROR-BARs for ALL "in-vacu" PARTiCLE-COUNTs, Cracked-pot.!! Many DiFFERENT particle-COUNTs *NOT* different SiTUATiONs, Dimwit.!!, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 2005/11/21
  - Re: EXHiBiT VELOCiTY & SPEED of light ..for DiFFERENT particle COUNTs.!! EXHiBiT ERROR-BARs for ALL "in-vacu" PARTiCLE-COUNTs, Cracked-pot.!! Many DiFFERENT particle-COUNTs *NOT* different SiTUATiONs, Dimwit.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/21
- Re: EXHiBiT VELOCiTY & SPEED of light ..for DiFFERENT particle COUNTs.!! EXHiBiT ERROR-BARs for ALL "in-vacu" PARTiCLE-COUNTs, Cracked-pot.!! Many DiFFERENT particle-COUNTs *NOT* different SiTUATiONs, Dimwit.!!, Mark Martin, 2005/11/21
Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity, Translation, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/21
Ampere's law with a long solenoid....., Harry, 2005/11/21
Batteries/electricity Safety Question, TribalLot, 2005/11/20
- Re: Batteries/electricity Safety Question, Doug, 2005/11/21
Lights On - Nobody Home; Response to Sam, platopes, 2005/11/20
- Re: Lights On - Nobody Home; Response to Sam, CWatters, 2005/11/21
- Lights On - Nobody Home; Response To Sam, Mitch Perkins, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Lights On - Nobody Home; Response To Sam, CWatters, 2005/11/21
Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, juggz, 2005/11/20
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Androcles, 2005/11/20
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, franklinhu, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Traveler, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, hanson, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Traveler, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Igor, 2005/11/22
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Traveler, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Traveler, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Peter, 2005/11/23
    - Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/23
    - Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Nick, 2005/11/23
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/21
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/21
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/21
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, PD, 2005/11/22
Magnetic Poles, Graffman, 2005/11/20
- Re: Magnetic Poles, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/20
- Message not available
  - Re: Magnetic Poles, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/20
- Message not available
  - Re: Magnetic Poles, Graffman, 2005/11/20
    - Re: Magnetic Poles, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/20
    - Re: Magnetic Poles, Charles, 2005/11/20
- Re: Magnetic Poles, RP, 2005/11/20
- Re: Magnetic Poles, CWatters, 2005/11/21
Lights On - Nobody Home, platopes, 2005/11/20
Universe Does Have An "Outside" 3: Pointers to Dimensions/Variables, OsherD, 2005/11/20
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 3: Pointers to Dimensions/Variables, OsherD, 2005/11/20
Molecular "cage" hoists atomic cargo, antimatter100, 2005/11/20
Spookfeed's movie., Androcles, 2005/11/20
Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, OsherD, 2005/11/20
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, OsherD, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, OsherD, 2005/11/20
    - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, dirk . laureyssens, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, OsherD, 2005/11/20
Watch pendulum with magnetic push pull kick, mustafa umut sarac, 2005/11/20
- Re: Watch pendulum with magnetic push pull kick, tadchem, 2005/11/20
Bladeless Magnetic MHD Turbine, mustafa umut sarac, 2005/11/20
- Re: Bladeless Magnetic MHD Turbine, Rene Tschaggelar, 2005/11/21
Spring pendulum, curtvon, 2005/11/20
- Re: Spring pendulum, curtvon, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Spring pendulum, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/20
- Re: Spring pendulum, Androcles, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Spring pendulum, curtvon, 2005/11/20
    - Re: Spring pendulum, Androcles, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Spring pendulum, curtvon, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Spring pendulum, Androcles, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Spring pendulum, Bob Cain, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Spring pendulum, truth . . teller, 2005/11/23
- Re: Spring pendulum, Harry, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Spring pendulum, curtvon, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Spring pendulum, Harry, 2005/11/21
- Re: Spring pendulum, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Spring pendulum, John Bailey, 2005/11/22
"Retic Postings and SPAM", Yad, 2005/11/20
- Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/20
- Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/20
- Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/20
- "Retic Postings and SPAM", Yad, 2005/11/20
  - Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", donstockbauer, 2005/11/20
  - Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", tadchem, 2005/11/20
Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/20
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, CWatters, 2005/11/20
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Full Name, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/27
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, CWatters, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, gerard46, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 2005/11/22
    - Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Mark Martin, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, tadchem, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, tadchem, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Externet, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, tadchem, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, PD, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, PD, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, PD, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, PD, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, odin, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Steve Ralph, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, PD, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Richard Henry, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Jerry, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, John Christiansen, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Steve Ralph, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Cephalobus_alienus, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, David Kastrup, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, PD, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, odin, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, tadchem, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, David Kastrup, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Androcles, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Jerry, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Jerry, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Androcles, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Steve Ralph, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, David R Tribble, 2005/11/22
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Clemens W, 2005/11/21
Introductory Physics Texts for Self Study, David M. Li, 2005/11/20
- Re: Introductory Physics Texts for Self Study, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/20
- Re: Introductory Physics Texts for Self Study, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/20
AS above SO below., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/20
Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD, 2005/11/20
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD, 2005/11/20
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Robert J. Kolker, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", john_ramsden, 2005/11/20
    - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Nick, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", T Wake, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Nick, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Traveler, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", George, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Traveler, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/21
    - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Starbles, 2005/11/20
    - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Terrence, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", glbrad01, 2005/11/21
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 2005/11/20
    - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD, 2005/11/21
SI GiORGi (MKSA) units are meter, kilogram, second and Ampere, duh.!! SI GUESS iSS units are meter, kilogram, second, Ampere, Kelvin & Mol. There are NO arbitrary fundamental physical constants of NATURE, now. The cgs ..or MKS units are no longer considered complete or coherent., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/20
Triggers Circuits, sygnus, 2005/11/20
- Re: Triggers Circuits, Louis Boyd, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Triggers Circuits, Adam Norton, 2005/11/21
- Re: Triggers Circuits, jimp, 2005/11/20
Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., John Decker, 2005/11/20
- Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/20
- Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/11/20
- Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., Bob Cain, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., jmfbahciv, 2005/11/20
    - Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., Happy Hippy, 2005/11/20
- Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., pete, 2005/11/20
Gravity & Magnetic impulse vs inertia., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/19
Butterfly Wings Share Light Tricks with TV, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/19
Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Uno Lapideus, 2005/11/19
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Mark Martin, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/19
    - Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/19
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/19
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Mathlete, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Androcles, 2005/11/20
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Androcles, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/19
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Old Man, 2005/11/19
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/20
    - Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Traveler, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Traveler, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Old Man, 2005/11/20
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, PD, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, stephen, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, vern, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, stephen, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Sue..., 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, surrealistic-dream, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, PD, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, PD, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, fart, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, mmeron, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Mathlete, 2005/11/28
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/21
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Old Man, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Old Man, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, glbrad01, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Henry Haapalainen, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/22
- Things consume, glom on, gravitate, in the sort term., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Things consume, glom on, gravitate, in the sort term., LEFTY, 2005/11/20
    - Order_Randomness is notional, not physical., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical., donstockbauer, 2005/11/22
      
      Hella sketch., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical., LEFTY, 2005/11/22
      
      _Physicalism_, Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: _Physicalism_, Dogma Discharge, 2005/11/23
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Orion, 2005/11/21
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, hanson, 2005/11/21
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Nick, 2005/11/23
YFE's, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/19
- Re: YFE's, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/20
- Re: YFE's, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/20
Maxwell stress tensor, Tobin Fricke, 2005/11/19
- Re: Maxwell stress tensor, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/22
Why Derivatives Usually Occur One Per Term in Physical Equations, OsherD, 2005/11/19
- Re: Why Derivatives Usually Occur One Per Term in Physical Equations, OsherD, 2005/11/19
English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, Stan Byers, 2005/11/19
- Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, Mark Martin, 2005/11/19
  - Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, Stan Byers, 2005/11/19
    - Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, Doug, 2005/11/20
- Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, John Decker, 2005/11/20
If Einstein And Minkowski Had Known About Cubic Complex Variables?, Mathlete, 2005/11/19
- Re: If Einstein And Minkowski Had Known About Cubic Complex Variables?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/19
- Re: If Einstein And Minkowski Had Known About Cubic Complex Variables?, Igor, 2005/11/20
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Woleb, 2005/11/19
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/19
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jambaugh, 2005/11/19
  - Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Androcles, 2005/11/19
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu, 2005/11/20
  - Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/20
    - Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", tj Frazir, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", tj Frazir, 2005/11/23
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 2005/11/29
  - Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Androcles, 2005/11/20
    - Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu, 2005/11/21
    - Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Nick, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/22
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", tadchem, 2005/11/21
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu, 2005/11/23
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/29
Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/19
- Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/19
    - Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/19
    - Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/19
    - Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, donstockbauer, 2005/11/19
Problems to Sharpen the Young, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/19
Cassini gets the skinny on Saturn's rings, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/19
Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 2005/11/19
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/19
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/19
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Old Man, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, mmeron, 2005/11/19
    - Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, hanson, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Old Man, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, hanson, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Old Man, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, hanson, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, hanson, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, hanson, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Traveler, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Androcles, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's, Johnny Depp, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's, Androcles, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Old Man, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Androcles, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, oriel36, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/11/20
Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, andy everett, 2005/11/19
- Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, PD, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, andy everett, 2005/11/19
- Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, Androcles, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, andy everett, 2005/11/19
- Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 2005/11/21
Silly question viz. double-slit experiment, wfaxon@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/19
- Re: Silly question viz. double-slit experiment, PD, 2005/11/19
  - A photon's Possible_Histories are physical, not notional., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/19
- Re: Silly question viz. double-slit experiment, Old Man, 2005/11/19
- Re: Silly question viz. double-slit experiment, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/19
Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, wfaxon@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/19
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, wfaxon@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/19
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Androcles, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Old Man, 2005/11/19
    - Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Androcles, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Old Man, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Androcles, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Old Man, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Androcles, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Bob Cain, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Paul Cardinale, 2005/11/21
An Infinite-Energy or Infinite-Force Black Hole, OsherD, 2005/11/19
- Re: An Infinite-Energy or Infinite-Force Black Hole, OsherD, 2005/11/19
  - Re: An Infinite-Energy or Infinite-Force Black Hole, OsherD, 2005/11/19
Re: Adics the native numbers of Riemann geometry; Eucl = Riem append Loba, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/18
- Re: Adics the native numbers of Riemann geometry; Eucl = Riem append Loba, mmeron, 2005/11/19
Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/18
- Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/19
    - Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/19
Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A New Relativistic Notion, Mathlete, 2005/11/18
- Re: Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A New Relativistic Notion, jambaugh, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A New Relativistic Notion, Mathlete, 2005/11/19
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 18 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/18
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 Nov 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/18
my two new pages, dedanoe, 2005/11/18
- Re: my two new pages, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/18
- Re: my two new pages, Androcles, 2005/11/18
Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods 2: Large Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/18
Re: absolute and relative launch pad, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/18
"A Snapshot of a Photon", Woleb, 2005/11/18
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/18
The anti graviti properties of spaghetti, Sam Wormhole, 2005/11/18
- Re: The anti graviti properties of spaghetti, Randy Poe, 2005/11/18
- Re: The anti graviti properties of spaghetti, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/18
- Re: The anti graviti properties of spaghetti, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/22
Re: question for the plate tectonically informed, Aidan Karley, 2005/11/18
Liquid Cooling Of Chips: Again popular ?, Robert11, 2005/11/18
BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., Ed Conrad, 2005/11/18
- Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., donstockbauer, 2005/11/18
  - Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., donstockbauer, 2005/11/18
  - Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., donstockbauer, 2005/11/18
    - Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., donstockbauer, 2005/11/18
Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/18
Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods, OsherD, 2005/11/18
- Re: Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods, OsherD, 2005/11/18
  - Re: Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods, OsherD, 2005/11/18
Powerful Magnetar Blast from Another Galaxy, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/18
Chaos protects networks in Athens, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/18
Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, jollyrogership, 2005/11/17
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, minus, 2005/11/18
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, minus, 2005/11/18
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/18
  - Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, Ying Wan, 2005/11/18
    - Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/18
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, surrealistic-dream, 2005/11/18
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, lone . nomad, 2005/11/19
  - Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, donstockbauer, 2005/11/19
INNOVATIONS, J.T., 2005/11/17
Where are the constants?, Don1, 2005/11/17
- Re: Where are the constants?, Doug, 2005/11/17
- Re: Where are the constants?, Old Man, 2005/11/17
- Re: Where are the constants?, Steve Ralph, 2005/11/17
  - Re: Where are the constants?, �, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Where are the constants?, Don1, 2005/11/17
- Re: Where are the constants?, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/17
- Re: Where are the constants?, Clemens W, 2005/11/18
  - Re: Where are the constants?, Don1, 2005/11/18
    - Re: Where are the constants?, PD, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Where are the constants?, Don1, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Where are the constants?, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Where are the constants?, Don1, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Where are the constants?, The TimeLord, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Where are the constants?, The TimeLord, 2005/11/21
- Re: Where are the constants?, PD, 2005/11/18
Re: Conservation of energy, tdennis14@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/17
Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel, Nguyen, 2005/11/17
- Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel, Ian Parker, 2005/11/17
  - Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel, Nguyen, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel, Black Knight, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel, Randy Poe, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel, Randy Poe, 2005/11/17
ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY, ACE, 2005/11/17
- Re: ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY, tadchem, 2005/11/17
- Re: ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY, Black Knight, 2005/11/17
- Re: ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY, Y.Porat, 2005/11/18
double D time, dedanoe, 2005/11/17
- Re: double D time, dedanoe, 2005/11/18
Mam, I am BLOG, dedanoe, 2005/11/17
Early Einstein publications online?, AES, 2005/11/17
- Re: Early Einstein publications online?, Black Knight, 2005/11/17
- Re: Early Einstein publications online?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/17
- Re: Early Einstein publications online?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/17
- Re: Early Einstein publications online?, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/17
  - Re: Early Einstein publications online?, AES, 2005/11/17
recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, a_plutonium, 2005/11/17
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/17
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Mark Martin, 2005/11/17
  - Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, a_plutonium, 2005/11/17
    - Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Mark Martin, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, pete, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, hanson, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Black Knight, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, hanson, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Black Knight, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, hanson, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, donstockbauer, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Androcles, 2005/11/18
      
      Message not available
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, donstockbauer, 2005/11/20
      
      Message not available
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Juan R., 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Lin Xiong, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Juan R., 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Juan R., 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Traveler, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 2005/11/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Traveler, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, donstockbauer, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, tadchem, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, donstockbauer, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, surrealistic-dream, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/30
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, surrealistic-dream, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, surrealistic-dream, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Traveler, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Traveler, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, surrealistic-dream, 2005/11/28
      
      Message not available
      Re: Einstein WAS smart, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, mmeron, 2005/11/17
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, a_plutonium, 2005/11/17
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, a_plutonium, 2005/11/17
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/18
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Juan R., 2005/11/18
  - Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, a_plutonium, 2005/11/18
    - Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Mark Martin, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, a_plutonium, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Juan R., 2005/11/19
  - Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Traveler, 2005/11/18
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/17
- Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, donstockbauer, 2005/11/23
- Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, Mike, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, Androcles, 2005/11/27
    - Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, Mike, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, Androcles, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, Bilge, 2005/11/27
    - Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, Mike, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
Knowledge and Dimensional Analysis Illustrate Curious Aspects of Axioms 2: Los Alamos Natl Lab, OsherD, 2005/11/17
equations of motion/inertial measurement, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/16
- Re: equations of motion/inertial measurement, Doug, 2005/11/17
  - Re: equations of motion/inertial measurement, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/17
- Re: equations of motion/inertial measurement, victorkemp, 2005/11/17
How do stars form?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/16
- Re: How do stars form?, john carruthers, 2005/11/17
- Re: How do stars form?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/17
  - Re: How do stars form?, Orion, 2005/11/19
Knowledge and Dimensional Analysis Illustrate Curious Aspects of Axioms, OsherD, 2005/11/16
- Re: Knowledge and Dimensional Analysis Illustrate Curious Aspects of Axioms, OsherD, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Knowledge and Dimensional Analysis Illustrate Curious Aspects of Axioms, OsherD, 2005/11/16
[QM] Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 2005/11/16
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 2005/11/16
    - Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 2005/11/17
  - Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., Black Knight, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., Black Knight, 2005/11/17
- Re: [QM] Trying to wrap my brain around..., Old Man, 2005/11/16
Vacuum - what is it?, Orion, 2005/11/16
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Traveler, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Vacuum - what is it?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Black Knight, 2005/11/17
  - Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Orion, 2005/11/17
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/17
  - Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Traveler, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Vacuum - what is it?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Lefty, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/18
    - Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Traveler, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Traveler, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, LEFTY, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Traveler, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, LEFTY, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Nick, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, LEFTY, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Androcles, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, LEFTY, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Orion, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, tdp1001, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, PD, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, PD, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Androcles, 2005/11/20
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/18
  - Re: Vacuum - what is it?, LEFTY, 2005/11/18
"The Source of Gravitational Energy", Rdc, 2005/11/16
- Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/16
  - Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy", donstockbauer, 2005/11/16
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/16
- Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Lefty, 2005/11/18
  - Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, donstockbauer, 2005/11/17
    - Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Lefty, 2005/11/18
Re: Breakthrough Physics in Kansas, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/16
"The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Cdr, 2005/11/16
- Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/16
- "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Retic, 2005/11/16
  - Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Orion, 2005/11/16
  - Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/16
Re: I caught a bottle of photons, Sue..., 2005/11/16
- Re: I caught a bottle of photons, AllYou!, 2005/11/16
Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, tdp1001, 2005/11/16
- Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, Black Knight, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, tdp1001, 2005/11/16
    - Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, Black Knight, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, tdp1001, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, Black Knight, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, tdp1001, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, Black Knight, 2005/11/18
- Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/17
Re: Eotvos., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/16
- Re: Eotvos., hanson, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Eotvos., Traveler, 2005/11/16
    - Re: Eotvos., hanson, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Eotvos., em, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Eotvos., hanson, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Eotvos., em, 2005/11/18
Why LiGHT c increases ELiMiNATE HUBBLE's SPACEs. Why LiGHT c increases to iNVERSE PARTiCLE COUNT. Why LiGHT v goes iNVERSE to PATH PARTiCLE COUNT. GR SPACE-time "curvature" is falling, is falling.!! Bohr RADiUS is the PROOF of jOE FiSHER EXPANSiON.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/16
- Housekeeping, Sue..., 2005/11/16
A question about lens, joshipura, 2005/11/16
- Re: A question about lens, donstockbauer, 2005/11/16
- Re: A question about lens, tadchem, 2005/11/16
- Re: A question about lens, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/16
  - Re: A question about lens, Richard Herring, 2005/11/16
- Re: A question about lens, PD, 2005/11/16
- Re: A question about lens, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/16
- Re: A question about lens, Matthew Lybanon, 2005/11/17
- Re: A question about lens, joshipura, 2005/11/18
  - Re: A question about lens, PD, 2005/11/18
    - Re: A question about lens, joshipura, 2005/11/24
911, Wtc on MSNBC - Controlled demolition proven again, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer, 2005/11/16
- Re: 911, Wtc on MSNBC - Controlled demolition proven again, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/16
- Re: 911, Wtc on MSNBC - Controlled demolition proven again, donstockbauer, 2005/11/16
Maxwell's demon realised, Dr Photon, 2005/11/16
- Re: Maxwell's demon realised, RP, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dave, 2005/11/16
    - Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dr Photon, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dr Photon, 2005/11/16
    - Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dave, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dr Photon, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dave, 2005/11/16
- Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dr Photon, 2005/11/24
  - Re: Maxwell's demon realised, xinyongfu, 2005/11/26
  - Re: Maxwell's demon realised, xinyongfu, 2005/11/26
GR-c goes "instantaneously" from 0 to c ..in NO time.!! But jOE, Tom Roberts says LiGHT "STOPs slowing down".!! [ Does SPEED c "STOP slowing down" instantaneously.? ] [ Does VELOCiTY c "STOP slowing down" ..automatically.? ] Does LiGHT "STOP slowing down" instantaneously automatically.?!! What is "simultaneity" for TWO different POiNTs on a TiME-line.?, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/16
- Re: GR-c goes "instantaneously" from 0 to c ..in NO time.!! But jOE, Tom Roberts says LiGHT "STOPs slowing down".!! [ Does SPEED c "STOP slowing down" instantaneously.? ] [ Does VELOCiTY c "STOP slowing down" ..automatically.? ] Does LiGHT "STOP slowing down" instantaneously automatically.?!! What is "simultaneity" for TWO different POiNTs on a TiME-line.?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/16
- No content above this line, Sue..., 2005/11/16
Re: Determinant-Matrix-PI "Exact" Relationship, OsherD, 2005/11/16
- Re: Determinant-Matrix-PI "Exact" Relationship, OsherD, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Determinant-Matrix-PI "Exact" Relationship, OsherD, 2005/11/16
An Application for Infrared Scanning?, mwmiller314, 2005/11/16
- Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, CWatters, 2005/11/16
  - Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, Black Knight, 2005/11/16
    - Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, CWatters, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, mwmiller314, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, Androcles, 2005/11/19
  - Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, Mark Martin, 2005/11/16
    - Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, jimp, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, mwmiller314, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, Androcles, 2005/11/19
Graduate Level Math Books For Sale, dgiaimo@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/16
Global poverty - causes, Orion, 2005/11/16
- Re: Global poverty - causes, Mark Martin, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Global poverty - causes, Orion, 2005/11/16
New look for optical microscopy, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/15
- Re: New look for optical microscopy, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/16
Research group needs your input, project . crossover, 2005/11/15
Article: Graphite Found to Exhibit Surprising Quantum Effects, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/11/15
- Re: Article: Graphite Found to Exhibit Surprising Quantum Effects, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Article: Graphite Found to Exhibit Surprising Quantum Effects, Y.Porat, 2005/11/16
Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge 2: Unitary, Random, etc., OsherD, 2005/11/15
- Re: Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge 2: Unitary, Random, etc., OsherD, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge 2: Unitary, Random, etc., OsherD, 2005/11/15
Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/15
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark-T, 2005/11/15
    - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Tice with a J, 2005/11/15
    - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, nightbat, 2005/11/15
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, David Wimp, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 2005/11/15
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Boris Mohar, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Tice with a J, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 2005/11/15
    - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, mmeron, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 2005/11/16
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/16
    - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/17
  - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Black Knight, 2005/11/16
    - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Black Knight, 2005/11/17
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/17
  - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/17
  - Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/19
"Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Cdr, 2005/11/15
- Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/15
periodic table as concentric rings of 16, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/15
- Re: periodic table as concentric rings of 16, PD, 2005/11/15
- Re: periodic table as concentric rings of 16, Y.Porat, 2005/11/16
Why kitchen foil makes so much noise, ceauke, 2005/11/15
- Re: Why kitchen foil makes so much noise, tadchem, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Why kitchen foil makes so much noise, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/15
- Re: Why kitchen foil makes so much noise, CWatters, 2005/11/15
MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., jollyrogership, 2005/11/15
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., donstockbauer, 2005/11/15
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Black Knight, 2005/11/15
  - Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Dave, 2005/11/15
    - Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Black Knight, 2005/11/15
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/15
  - Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., jollyrogership, 2005/11/15
  - Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., suznet, 2005/11/22
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., AllYou!, 2005/11/15
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Bill Hobba, 2005/11/15
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., June R Harton, 2005/11/16
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Cotan Theta, 2005/11/16
  - Glomming_On, i.e. gravity and consumption, only happens in the Short_Term., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/16
    - Re: Glomming_On, i.e. gravity and consumption, only happens in the Short_Term., Cotan Theta, 2005/11/16
  - Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., surrealistic-dream, 2005/11/21
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., vanep, 2005/11/19
- Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., jollyrogership, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Bill Hobba, 2005/11/23
  - Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., June R Harton, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., rangermccoy, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., June R Harton, 2005/11/26
      
      Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., June R Harton, 2005/11/30
  - Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Paul Cardinale, 2005/11/26
    - Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., drelliot, 2005/11/28
Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/11/15
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/15
  - Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/11/15
    - Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, donstockbauer, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 2005/11/15
  - Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 2005/11/15
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 2005/11/21
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 2005/11/21
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 2005/11/22
  - Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, Bob Cain, 2005/11/22
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 2005/11/22
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 2005/11/22
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 2005/11/23
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 2005/11/28
LiGHT velocity c is NOW a MATHEMATiCAL constant ..just as is, pi.!! LiGHT velocity c is NOW a, transcendental, MATHEMATiCAL constant.!! LiGHT velocity v VARiEs, inversely, WiTH the PATH particle COUNT.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/15
- Math, Sue..., 2005/11/15
YAB-a-dab-a-doo.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/15
- YAB-a-dab-a-doo.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/15
Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/15
- Re: Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/15
Italy: Corrupt Selection of Academic Staff, David Aliaga, 2005/11/15
- Re: Italy: Corrupt Selection of Academic Staff, pete, 2005/11/15
Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/14
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, nospam, 2005/11/14
  - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/15
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/15
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/15
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, jbacsa2, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, hanson, 2005/11/20
  - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/15
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/19
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, tadchem, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/15
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, jimp, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, jimp, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Black Knight, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Black Knight, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, hanson, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Black Knight, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, hanson, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Matthew Lybanon, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, donstockbauer, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/18
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, PD, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, PD, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Black Knight, 2005/11/15
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/15
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Wimp, 2005/11/16
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Wimp, 2005/11/16
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Wimp, 2005/11/16
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Wimp, 2005/11/16
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, relather, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, donstockbauer, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/17
      
      What's simpler than the remnant radiation of the big bang, the CMBR ?, Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: What's simpler than the remnant radiation of the big bang, the CMBR ?, David Thomson, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: What's simpler than the remnant radiation of the big bang, the CMBR ?, David Thomson, 2005/11/18
      
      Both a photon and the unverse are infinitely complex., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Both a photon and the unverse are infinitely complex., David Thomson, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Both a photon and the unverse are infinitely complex., Androcles, 2005/11/19
      
      Thomson, How can you be so sure a photon has a finite complexity ?, Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/19
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, relather, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, relather, 2005/11/27
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, franklinhu, 2005/11/17
  - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Robert J. Kolker, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Black Knight, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Robert J. Kolker, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mountain man, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Traveler, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, donstockbauer, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, hanson, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Traveler, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/17
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Robert J. Kolker, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Androcles, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, tadchem, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Androcles, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, tadchem, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Androcles, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, ?, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Carlos L, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/19
    - The speed of light is always local, with local causes, of course., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: The speed of light is always local, with local causes, of course., David Thomson, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Traveler, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, ?, 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, T Wake, 2005/11/27
  - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, franklinhu, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Traveler, 2005/11/17
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 2005/11/17
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, franklinhu, 2005/11/18
  - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Robert J. Kolker, 2005/11/18
    - Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, relather, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Androcles, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, relather, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, hanson, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, relather, 2005/11/19
How do I say these scientific notation terms?, janey3white, 2005/11/14
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, PD, 2005/11/14
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/14
  - Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/14
  - Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, arvee, 2005/11/14
    - Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, OG, 2005/11/14
    - Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/15
  - Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, Black Knight, 2005/11/14
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, janey3white, 2005/11/14
  - Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, Lefty, 2005/11/15
  - Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, PD, 2005/11/15
    - Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, tadchem, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, mmeron, 2005/11/15
Re: chinese slurp too much when they eat, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/14
GUESS adopted Fischer Expansion., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/14
A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/14
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/14
  - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/14
    - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/14
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, PD, 2005/11/14
  - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, odin, 2005/11/14
    - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, PD, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, PD, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, PD, 2005/11/16
  - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/14
  - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, tadchem, 2005/11/14
    - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, PD, 2005/11/15
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Double-A, 2005/11/14
  - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/14
    - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, imaginatorium, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, odin, 2005/11/14
  - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/14
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, luiroto, 2005/11/16
  - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/16
    - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/17
    - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, The TimeLord, 2005/11/21
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, CrankHater, 2005/11/17
  - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/17
    - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, T Wake, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Proginoskes, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, T Wake, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, donstockbauer, 2005/11/19
    - Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, The TimeLord, 2005/11/21
can c approach zero?, Tresa, 2005/11/14
- Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 2005/11/14
  - Re: can c approach zero?, Tresa, 2005/11/14
    - Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: can c approach zero?, Tresa, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: can c approach zero?, RP, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 2005/11/14
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: can c approach zero?, Tresa, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: can c approach zero?, Tresa, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 2005/11/15
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: can c approach zero?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/14
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: can c approach zero?, Black Knight, 2005/11/15
Determinants, Knowledge, and PI, OsherD, 2005/11/14
- Re: Determinants, Knowledge, and PI, nospam, 2005/11/14
- Re: Determinants, Knowledge, and PI, OsherD, 2005/11/14
  - Re: Determinants, Knowledge, and PI, OsherD, 2005/11/14
"The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Cdr, 2005/11/14
- Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/14
- Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", SBC Yahoo, 2005/11/14
  - Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Dr Photon, 2005/11/14
    - Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Black Knight, 2005/11/14
  - Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Black Knight, 2005/11/14
    - Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Black Knight, 2005/11/14
Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 2005/11/14
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 2005/11/16
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Mark Martin, 2005/11/16
  - Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 2005/11/18
    - Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, donstockbauer, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/19
    - Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/22
      
      Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/27
      
      Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/29
Re: patterns on swimming pool floor, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/14
- Re: patterns on swimming pool floor, Black Knight, 2005/11/14
CMBR - another explanation, Orion, 2005/11/14
- Re: CMBR - another explanation, donstockbauer, 2005/11/14
  - Re: CMBR - another explanation, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/15
    - Re: CMBR - another explanation, donstockbauer, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: CMBR - another explanation, donstockbauer, 2005/11/17
- Re: CMBR - another explanation, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/14
- Re: CMBR - another explanation, tadchem, 2005/11/14
  - Re: CMBR - another explanation, Orion, 2005/11/14
A second great depression, Orion, 2005/11/14
- Re: A second great depression, Greysky, 2005/11/14
- Re: A second great depression, dedanoe, 2005/11/15
  - Re: A second great depression, donstockbauer, 2005/11/15
- Re: A second great depression, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/15
  - Re: A second great depression, Orion, 2005/11/15
    - Re: A second great depression, Orion, 2005/11/15
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 14, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2005/11/14
Knowledge "Operator" Creates Mass, Tensors, and QM 3: More on L, OsherD, 2005/11/14
- Re: Knowledge "Operator" Creates Mass, Tensors, and QM 3: More on L, OsherD, 2005/11/14
Galaxies may have spit out monster black hole, neutrino750, 2005/11/13
Knowledge "Operator" Creates Mass, Tensors, and QM 2: QM, OsherD, 2005/11/13
Physics and Astronomy Fun, Mike Jr., 2005/11/13
- Re: Physics and Astronomy Fun, Black Knight, 2005/11/13
Biophysics Texts, The Unstable Concoction of Fascinet, 2005/11/13
- Re: Biophysics Texts, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/14
  - Re: Biophysics Texts, The Unstable Concoction of Fascinet, 2005/11/14
    - Re: Biophysics Texts, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Biophysics Texts, The Unstable Concoction of Fascinet, 2005/11/15
Knowledge "Operator" Creates Mass, Tensors, and QM, OsherD, 2005/11/13
The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2005/11/13
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 2005/11/13
  - Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2005/11/16
  - Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2005/11/29
- Re: The proof of mass vector., PD, 2005/11/14
  - Re: The proof of mass vector., dedanoe, 2005/11/15
  - Message not available
    - Re: The proof of mass vector., PD, 2005/11/18
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: The proof of mass vector., PD, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: The proof of mass vector., Lynx Xiong, 2005/11/20
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2005/11/21
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2005/11/23
Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/13
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Bob Cain, 2005/11/13
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/14
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Black Knight, 2005/11/14
  - Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/14
    - Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Black Knight, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Black Knight, 2005/11/14
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Black Knight, 2005/11/14
tell me if my site is visible for you, dedanoe, 2005/11/13
- Re: tell me if my site is visible for you, OG, 2005/11/13
  - Re: tell me if my site is visible for you, dedanoe, 2005/11/14
GR soap-on-a-rope, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/13
fine-man's luck-ters, oldton, 2005/11/13
- Re: fine-man's luck-ters, Black Knight, 2005/11/13
  - Re: fine-man's luck-ters, oldton, 2005/11/13
    - Re: fine-man's luck-ters, T Wake, 2005/11/13
Why are some transparent oxides electrically conductive?, JAH, 2005/11/13
Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/13
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jimp, 2005/11/13
  - Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, donstockbauer, 2005/11/13
    - Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, donstockbauer, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/14
    - Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jimp, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, donstockbauer, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jimp, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jimp, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jimp, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jimp, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, donstockbauer, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/17
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, Steven Gray, 2005/11/13
  - Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, Black Knight, 2005/11/13
    - Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, Steven Gray, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/14
    - Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, Steven Gray, 2005/11/14
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/14
  - Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/14
How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Eliot Coweye, 2005/11/13
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Charles, 2005/11/13
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, pete, 2005/11/13
  - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/13
    - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/13
  - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/13
    - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Stevie B, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/14
  - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Voice of Wisdom, 2005/11/13
    - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Traveler, 2005/11/13
    - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Voice of Wisdom, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/14
    - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Voice of Wisdom, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, temp phys username, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, temp phys username, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, temp phys username, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, temp phys username, 2005/11/17
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Black Knight, 2005/11/13
  - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/14
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Traveler, 2005/11/13
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Anton Vredegoor, 2005/11/13
  - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Gerard van Wilgen, 2005/11/13
    - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Gerard van Wilgen, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Gerard van Wilgen, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Black Knight, 2005/11/13
  - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Bob Cain, 2005/11/13
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/13
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/13
  - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/13
    - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Black Knight, 2005/11/13
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/13
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, PD, 2005/11/14
  - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/15
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, tadchem, 2005/11/14
  - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, briggs, 2005/11/14
    - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, tadchem, 2005/11/14
    - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/15
  - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Traveler, 2005/11/14
    - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, tadchem, 2005/11/14
  - Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/15
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Mark Martin, 2005/11/14
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Dori, 2005/11/14
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Tristan Beeline, 2005/11/29
CorelDRAW proves Newton's gravity WRONG!!!, dedanoe, 2005/11/13
Ken's gravity, Fred's photons, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/13
Re: Did Einstein say this, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/13
However, SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ is *NOT* "part and parcel of the theories used with great success throughout modern physics. SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ has NEVER been RELATED TO T_uv MASS.!! iRONiCALLY, there is, actually, NO GR-SPACE-time-*CURVATURE*.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/13
There are *THEORETiCAL models*, *MATHEMATiCAL models* and *REAL* models. There are, actually, NO *PHYSiCAL* theories, what-so-ever, you dimwit.!! And, the "theory" is NOT the "mathematics" (i.e. "arithmetic"), dooOP.!! Ph. Tivitists NEVER want to find that "underlying reality" (and, what that means). It is finished for them, if we EVER find the "underlying reality". There'd be no more "girls Friday", if you know what i mean. However, we TRY to *PiECE TOGETHER* "underlying [bits of] reality" with various MODELs. MODELs are TRiALs & ERRORs of the "underlying reality"., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/13
- Re: There are *THEORETiCAL models*, *MATHEMATiCAL models* and *REAL* models. There are, actually, NO *PHYSiCAL* theories, what-so-ever, you dimwit.!! And, the "theory" is NOT the "mathematics" (i.e. "arithmetic"), dooOP.!! Ph. Tivitists NEVER want to find that "underlying reality" (and, what that means). It is finished for them, if we EVER find the "underlying reality". There'd be no more "girls Friday", if you know what i mean. However, we TRY to *PiECE TOGETHER* "underlying [bits of] reality" with various MODELs. MODELs are TRiALs & ERRORs of the "underlying reality"., Y.Porat, 2005/11/13
  - Re: There are *THEORETiCAL models*, *MATHEMATiCAL models* and *REAL* models. There are, actually, NO *PHYSiCAL* theories, what-so-ever, you dimwit.!! And, the "theory" is NOT the "mathematics" (i.e. "arithmetic"), dooOP.!! Ph. Tivitists NEVER want to find that "underlying reality" (and, what that means). It is finished for them, if we EVER find the "underlying reality". There'd be no more "girls Friday", if you know what i mean. However, we TRY to *PiECE TOGETHER* "underlying [bits of] reality" with various MODELs. MODELs are TRiALs & ERRORs of the "underlying reality"., Martin Brown, 2005/11/13
    - google gobbles :o), Sue..., 2005/11/13
"Zombie Physics", tdp1001, 2005/11/13
- Re: "Zombie Physics", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/13
  - Re: "Zombie Physics", tdp1001, 2005/11/14
    - Re: "Zombie Physics", Sam Wormley, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: "Zombie Physics", tdp1001, 2005/11/15
- Re: "Zombie Physics", Black Knight, 2005/11/13
  - Re: "Zombie Physics", Happy Hippy, 2005/11/13
    - Re: "Zombie Physics", Happy Hippy, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: "Zombie Physics", donstockbauer, 2005/11/14
"Fan"-driven pendulum simulation?, jswitte, 2005/11/13
- Re: "Fan"-driven pendulum simulation?, CWatters, 2005/11/13
  - Re: "Fan"-driven pendulum simulation?, jswitte, 2005/11/13
Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., tj Frazir, 2005/11/13
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., T Wake, 2005/11/13
  - Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., hanson, 2005/11/13
    - Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., tj Frazir, 2005/11/13
      
      tj Frazir's 3rd peddler attempt on hanson, hanson, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Frazir continues..., T Wake, 2005/11/14
    - Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., tj Frazir, 2005/11/13
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/13
  - Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., tj Frazir, 2005/11/13
    - Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., T Wake, 2005/11/14
  - Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., tj Frazir, 2005/11/13
MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/12
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/13
  - Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 2005/11/13
    - Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, T Wake, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Frazir has a foggy brain, T Wake, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Black Knight, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Black Knight, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Androcles, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Androcles, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Androcles, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, donstockbauer, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Frazirs foggy bottom, T Wake, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tdp1001, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Androcles, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, hanson, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tdp1001, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, T Wake, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, T Wake, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, T Wake, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, T Wake, 2005/11/14
    - Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Frazir gets it right at last!, T Wake, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Frazir gets it right at last!, donstockbauer, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Frazir gets it right at last!, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Frazir gets it right at last!, tj Frazir, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Frazir gets it right at last!, tj Frazir, 2005/11/13
New Telescope Opens Its Eyes, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/12
- Re: New Telescope Opens Its Eyes, Erik, 2005/11/16
  - Re: New Telescope Opens Its Eyes, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/16
photon, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/12
- Message not available
  - Re: photon, Old Man, 2005/11/12
Kinetic Energy Etc, jclause, 2005/11/12
- Re: Kinetic Energy Etc, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/12
- Re: Kinetic Energy Etc, Steven Gray, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Kinetic Energy Etc, jclause, 2005/11/14
- Re: Kinetic Energy Etc, OG, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Kinetic Energy Etc, jclause, 2005/11/14
Creation and Annihilation Operators and Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/12
- Re: Creation and Annihilation Operators and Knowledge, Tresa, 2005/11/12
Article: History of Physics - Paul Dirac, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/11/12
- Re: Article: History of Physics - Paul Dirac, OsherD, 2005/11/12
- Re: Article: History of Physics - Paul Dirac, Black Knight, 2005/11/12
Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents 2: P(A-->B) = K, OsherD, 2005/11/12
LiGHT velocity v VARiEs, inversely, WiTH the path PARTiCLE COUNT.!! LiGHT velocity c is NOW a MATHEMATiCAL constant ..just as is, pi.!! You will NEED essentially in theory, a *well-defined* LaGrangian.!! $ NEW SI GUESS iSS CODATA LaGrangian L: L = h*fL = nL*h*c / wl = nA*{mph}*ls*c^2 / rA = m1*c^2 = E - eM - eV = eK - eV = eM - eF = [(m1*v1^2 / 2)*(m1/M1 + 1)]., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/12
- Re: LiGHT velocity v VARiEs, inversely, WiTH the path PARTiCLE COUNT.!! LiGHT velocity c is NOW a MATHEMATiCAL constant ..just as is, pi.!! You will NEED essentially in theory, a *well-defined* LaGrangian.!! $ NEW SI GUESS iSS CODATA LaGrangian L: L = h*fL = nL*h*c / wl = nA*{mph}*ls*c^2 / rA = m1*c^2 = E - eM - eV = eK - eV = eM - eF = [(m1*v1^2 / 2)*(m1/M1 + 1)]., Sue..., 2005/11/12
- Re: LiGHT screams from the assylum, Sue..., 2005/11/12
  - Re: LiGHT screams from the assylum, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/12
Re: A little challenge for relativists., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/12
- Re: A little challenge for relativists., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/21
Network math leads to an alternative, simpler ranking scheme, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/12
- Re: Network math leads to an alternative, simpler ranking scheme, Ian Parker, 2005/11/12
That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/12
- Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/12
- Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles, Y.Porat, 2005/11/12
- Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/12
- Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/13
  - Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles 2x4 plastic Sheet WOW, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/14
    - Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles 2x4 plastic Sheet WOW, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/14
Sound waves target new applications, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/12
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 11 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/12
- Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 11 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/14
Why CHiCKEN LiTTLE "felt", "NO feeling".!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/12
- Why CHiCKEN LiTTLE "felt", "NO feeling".!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Why CHiCKEN LiTTLE "felt", "NO feeling".!!, tensor, 2005/11/12
Re: Many writers fail to emphasis important facts about gravity theory, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/12
- Re: Many writers fail to emphasis important facts about gravity theory, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/13
Re: Do these questions about Maxwell's Equations make sense?, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/12
SiR CRANK-a-LOT, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/12
- SiR CRANK-a-LOT, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/12
Re: Give up Black Holes, Francis Rey, 2005/11/12
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/12
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Black Knight, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Give up Black Holes, Nick, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Give up Black Holes, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/25
    - Re: Give up Black Holes, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/25
    - Re: Give up Black Holes, tadchem, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Give up Black Holes, Androcles, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Give up Black Holes, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Give up Black Holes, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/29
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Sue..., 2005/11/12
K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 5: P^K vs K^P, OsherD, 2005/11/12
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 5: P^K vs K^P, OsherD, 2005/11/12
Lunar Lawn Mower, Mike Jr., 2005/11/12
help, oldton, 2005/11/12
- Re: help, Black Knight, 2005/11/12
  - Re: help, oldton, 2005/11/13
- Re: help, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/12
- Re: help, donstockbauer, 2005/11/12
  - Re: help, oldton, 2005/11/13
- Re: help, tadchem, 2005/11/12
- Re: help, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/12
  - Re: help, donstockbauer, 2005/11/12
K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 4: Wave Function and PI as Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/11
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 4: Wave Function and PI as Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/11
  - Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 4: Wave Function and PI as Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/11
    - Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 4: Wave Function and PI as Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 4: Wave Function and PI as Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/12
Dimensional consistency, Don1, 2005/11/11
- Re: Dimensional consistency, xxein, 2005/11/11
- Re: Dimensional consistency, donstockbauer, 2005/11/11
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Bob Cain, 2005/11/12
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Dimensional consistency, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/12
    - Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 2005/11/12
    - Re: Dimensional consistency, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/12
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 2005/11/12
    - Re: Dimensional consistency, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/12
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Dimensional consistency, odin, 2005/11/12
    - Re: Dimensional consistency, donstockbauer, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 2005/11/12
    - Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 2005/11/12
    - Re: Dimensional consistency, Steve Ralph, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Dimensional consistency, Steve Ralph, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 2005/11/14
K&K Mechanics, Jordan Glassman, 2005/11/11
- Re: K&K Mechanics, nithyanand, 2005/11/27
Illiterate Davd A. Smith, Black Knight, 2005/11/11
- Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, Themistocles, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2005/11/11
- Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, Richard Tobin, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, Black Knight, 2005/11/12
    - Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, tensor, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, Black Knight, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2005/11/13
Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 2005/11/11
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Old Man, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Sue..., 2005/11/11
  - Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Black Knight, 2005/11/12
    - Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, hanson, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Black Knight, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, hanson, 2005/11/12
    - Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Old Man, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Old Man, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, hanson, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, hanson, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Old Man, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, hanson, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Old Man, 2005/11/14
      
      Message not available
      Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Old Man, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, hanson, 2005/11/15
      
      Glomming_On, i.e. gravity and consumption, only happens in the Short_Term., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Glomming_On, i.e. gravity and consumption, only happens in the Short_Term., hanson, 2005/11/16
      
      Fighting T_J and other suicide bombers., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Fighting T_J and other suicide bombers., hanson, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Old Man, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Black Knight, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 2005/11/17
      
      Ha_Ha_Hanson's jumper was _Consumed_ by the planet earth., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson's jumper was _Consumed_ by the planet earth., CrankHater, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson's jumper was _Consumed_ by the planet earth., hanson, 2005/11/17
      
      Dr. Unruh: www.Theory.Physics.UBC.CA, Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Dr. Unruh: www.Theory.Physics.UBC.CA, Thomas Wootten, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Dr. Unruh: www.Theory.Physics.UBC.CA, C.J. Luke, 2005/11/18
      
      Photons don't make round trips., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Old Man, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Old Man, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Androcles, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Androcles, 2005/11/18
      
      Message not available
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Androcles, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Old Man, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Androcles, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Old Man, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Androcles, 2005/11/19
      
      Message not available
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, em, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Harry, 2005/11/22
  - Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, jimp, 2005/11/12
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, donstockbauer, 2005/11/11
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 2005/11/12
    - Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2005/11/12
K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 3: Robots and Cellular Automata, OsherD, 2005/11/11
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 3: Robots and Cellular Automata, OsherD, 2005/11/11
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 11 Nov 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/11
K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 2: Left-Inner-Product, OsherD, 2005/11/11
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 2: Left-Inner-Product, OsherD, 2005/11/11
  - Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 2: Left-Inner-Product, donstockbauer, 2005/11/11
    - Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 2: Left-Inner-Product, OsherD, 2005/11/11
  - Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 2: Left-Inner-Product, OsherD, 2005/11/11
making donuts with levers..., dedanoe, 2005/11/11
- Message not available
  - Re: making donuts with levers..., dedanoe, 2005/11/13
Re: [OT?] Destroying data on bank card, Bob Eager, 2005/11/11
THE PHOTON, ACE, 2005/11/11
- THE PHOTON, ACE, 2005/11/21
Nonlinear equations, Javier, 2005/11/11
- Re: Nonlinear equations, Ian Parker, 2005/11/11
- Re: Nonlinear equations, John Christiansen, 2005/11/11
- Re: Nonlinear equations, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/11
Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, physics grad, 2005/11/11
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Orion, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/11
    - Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/11
    - Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, physics grad, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, mmeron, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Orion, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, mmeron, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, PD, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, PD, 2005/11/14
    - Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Orion, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, mmeron, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Orion, 2005/11/12
      
      The transistor is not applicable in the commericial world., Black Knight, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/13
  - Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, physics grad, 2005/11/12
    - Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Black Knight, 2005/11/12
    - Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/12
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Dori, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/12
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/12
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, PD, 2005/11/12
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, carlip-nospam, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Orion, 2005/11/15
Hot Metal Glowing., mike3, 2005/11/11
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Dori, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Dori, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Hot Metal Glowing., mike3, 2005/11/11
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/11
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., pete, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Hot Metal Glowing., mike3, 2005/11/11
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Old Man, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/12
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Hot Metal Glowing., mike3, 2005/11/13
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/13
Search engines are not unfair, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/10
- Re: Search engines are not unfair, Dori, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Search engines are not unfair, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/11
    - Re: Search engines are not unfair, Dori, 2005/11/11
    - Re: Search engines are not unfair, Dori, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Search engines are not unfair, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/11
    - Re: Search engines are not unfair, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Search engines are not unfair, donstockbauer, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Search engines are not unfair, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/11
No good deed goes unpunished., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/10
- No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., hanson, 2005/11/11
  - Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., chrisv, 2005/11/11
    - Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., hanson, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., tj Frazir, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., T Wake, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., hanson, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., hanson, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., tj Frazir, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., T Wake, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., hanson, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., tj Frazir, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., T Wake, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., donstockbauer, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., tj Frazir, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., tj Frazir, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., T Wake, 2005/11/12
      
      Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, hanson, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, donstockbauer, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, hanson, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, tj Frazir, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, T Wake, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, hanson, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, john_ramsden, 2005/11/12
      
      T_J has a PhD in physics... from where ? !, Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: T_J has a PhD in physics... from where ? !, tj Frazir, 2005/11/13
      
      T_J, X_City is something you created in your dreams., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/13
      
      Dr. tj Frazir, PhD in physics & math..... from Rusha, hanson, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: ing morons., tj Frazir, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Frazir rants again., T Wake, 2005/11/14
      
      tj says that he is a ing moron., hanson, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: tj says that hanson is a ing moron., tj Frazir, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: tj says that hanson is a ing moron., tj Frazir, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: tj says that hanson is a ing moron., hanson, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: tj says that hanson is a ing moron., hanson, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Dr. tj Frazir, PhD in physics & math..... from Rusha, tj Frazir, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Dr. tj Frazir, PhD in physics & math..... from Rusha, T Wake, 2005/11/14
      
      tj Frazir's Lame Powerless Engine, his LPE, hanson, 2005/11/14
      
      T_J has no place to invest., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: T_J has no place to invest., tj Frazir, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: tj Frazir's Lame Powerless Engine, his LPE, tj Frazir, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: tj Frazir's Lame Powerless Engine, his LPE, T Wake, 2005/11/15
      
      T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all so retarded ?, Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all ..., tj Frazir, 2005/11/15
      
      T_J's _Extreme_Paranoia_and_Delusions_of_Grandeur_., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all..., hanson, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all..., tj Frazir, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all..., donstockbauer, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we'reall..., hanson, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we'reall..., T Wake, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: tj Frazir's Lame Powerless Engine, his LPE, hanson, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: T_J has a PhD in physics... from where ? !, T Wake, 2005/11/14
  - T.J.'s a drug addict who _Must_ con people to feed his habit., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/11
    - Re: T.J.'s a drug addict who _Must_ con people to feed his habit., hanson, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: T.J.'s a drug addict who _Must_ con people to feed his habit., tj Frazir, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: T.J.'s a drug addict who _Must_ con people to feed his habit., T Wake, 2005/11/11
      
      Prohibition: Mental health is a far, Far, _Far_ greater issue., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Prohibition: Mental health is a far, Far, _Far_ greater issue., John Bailo, 2005/11/12
      
      New_York_Boy, are you totally isolated from all this ? !, Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/12
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished., John Bailo, 2005/11/11
  - I prefer to stay in my room... preferrably alone and in the dark., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/11
    - Re: I prefer to stay in my room... preferrably alone and in the dark., John A. Bailo, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: I prefer to stay in my room... preferrably alone and in the dark., Eric Gisse, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: I prefer to stay in my room... preferrably alone and in the dark., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/11
K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T), OsherD, 2005/11/10
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T), OsherD, 2005/11/11
  - Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T), OsherD, 2005/11/11
    - Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T), OsherD, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T), OsherD, 2005/11/11
New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/10
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), FrediFizzx, 2005/11/11
  - Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/11
    - Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/11
    - Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/11
    - Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), nightbat, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Art Deco, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 2005/11/13
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), FrediFizzx, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), FrediFizzx, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/12
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), FrediFizzx, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/13
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 2005/11/13
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), bz, 2005/11/13
    - Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/11
    - Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/17
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/17
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/18
      
      $ 3*VOLUME / AREA, per DURATiON = RADiAL velocity.!! Delta, VOLUME / surface AREA ..per second, is RADiAL velocity / 3. Unit TRiAKiSicosa VOLUME / (surf AREA*sec) is TiP-to-TiP / 6*sec. Unit SPHERiCAL VOLUME / (surface AREA*sec) is, DiAMETER / 6*sec. Unit CUBiCAL VOLUME / (surface AREA*second) = EDGEside / 6*sec. GRAViTATiONAL impulse per VOLUME; iNERTiAL impulse, per AREA.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/18
      
      YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., Autymn D. C., 2005/11/19
      
      Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., Sue..., 2005/11/19
      
      Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., Autymn D. C., 2005/11/20
      
      Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/20
      
      Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/18
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/18
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 2005/11/19
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 2005/11/19
  - Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/11
    - Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Tom Roberts, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Tom Roberts, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/16
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 2005/11/16
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 2005/11/16
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/19
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 2005/11/19
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Dr Photon, 2005/11/11
  - Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/11
    - Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 2005/11/13
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Themistocles, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 2005/11/16
    - Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Dr Photon, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 2005/11/16
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 2005/11/17
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 2005/11/19
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/19
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Dr Photon, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/21
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 2005/11/22
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 2005/11/22
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/22
      
      Sue to try GUESS equations., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/22
      
      Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Dr Photon, 2005/11/21
Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/10
- Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/10
  - Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/10
    - Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/10
Re: World War II in the Pacific, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/10
- Re: World War II in the Pacific, mmeron, 2005/11/10
- Re: World War II in the Pacific, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/14
minitaller, valeri, 2005/11/10
- minitaller, valeri, 2005/11/10
Knowledge Equation Logarithmic Analysis, OsherD, 2005/11/10
- Re: Knowledge Equation Logarithmic Analysis, OsherD, 2005/11/10
  - Re: Knowledge Equation Logarithmic Analysis, OsherD, 2005/11/10
    - Re: Knowledge Equation Logarithmic Analysis, OsherD, 2005/11/10
YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, edconrad, 2005/11/10
- Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, donstockbauer, 2005/11/10
  - Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, lifeform1, 2005/11/10
    - Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, The Sanity Inspector, 2005/11/11
    - Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, Mars McLue, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, Twittering One, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, Jean-Paul Turcaud, 2005/11/14
  - Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, Anders Eklöf, 2005/11/14
Hammond jumps the shark, Re: killfile notice, pete, 2005/11/10
Capillary siphon modeling, Tao, 2005/11/10
- Re: Capillary siphon modeling, tadchem, 2005/11/10
Transition of weights in distorted equilibrium plane, dedanoe, 2005/11/10
- Re: Transition of weights in distorted equilibrium plane, dedanoe, 2005/11/10
Free web-based seminar on spectroscopy, hannahvfromdublin, 2005/11/10
He-der THEORY (He-ALL-der) with RED-and-BLUE-shifted RAW DATA.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/10
Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/10
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang, hog . badger, 2005/11/11
pls ignore, Tar Baby, 2005/11/10
The Harmonic Representation of Particles, main_engineering, 2005/11/09
- Re: The Harmonic Representation of Particles, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/11
- Re: The Harmonic Representation of Particles, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/12
  - Re: The Harmonic Representation of Particles, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/14
  - Message not available
    - Re: The Harmonic Representation of Particles, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/15
Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/09
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, RP, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/14
    - Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, RP, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 2005/11/15
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/10
  - Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/10
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 2005/11/10
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 2005/11/11
    - Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, jesper pedersen, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 2005/11/15
Budiyono K = 1/M and M = K^2 Variations From Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/09
- Re: Budiyono K = 1/M and M = K^2 Variations From Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/10
Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, newedana, 2005/11/09
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, oxazoline, 2005/11/10
  - Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, oxazoline, 2005/11/10
  - Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/10
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, tressure, 2005/11/10
  - Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, oxazoline, 2005/11/10
    - Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, Mike Lepore, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, tadchem, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, Mike Lepore, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, tadchem, 2005/11/16
    - Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, simplesong1004, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, tadchem, 2005/11/25
      
      Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, newedana, 2005/11/27
Help with quantum computing project, kenfitz3, 2005/11/09
- Re: Help with quantum computing project, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Help with quantum computing project, Traveler, 2005/11/10
- Re: Help with quantum computing project, Androcles, 2005/11/10
- Re: Help with quantum computing project, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/10
Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, John Black, 2005/11/09
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Henry Haapalainen, 2005/11/09
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/09
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, John Black, 2005/11/10
    - Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, tadchem, 2005/11/10
    - Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, john0714@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/11
    - Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, nightbat, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, donstockbauer, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Art Deco, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Michael Baldwin Bruce, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Dr. Flonkenstein, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, yyyiiinnnggg, 2005/11/13
      
      Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Black Knight, 2005/11/11
    - Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, John Black, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, codesuidae, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/12
- The zoomed out view is X_Rated., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/09
  - Re: The zoomed out view is X_Rated., xxein, 2005/11/09
    - Each only wins in the Short_Run, never the Long_Run., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Each only wins in the Short_Run, never the Long_Run., xxein, 2005/11/10
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/11/10
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, carlip-nospam, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Themistocles, 2005/11/11
  - Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/12
  - Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, John Black, 2005/11/14
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Mike Lepore, 2005/11/12
Low Enriched Nuclear Bombs, sidon20051, 2005/11/09
Re: free on line compressible flow book, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/09
Re: Beating the sub-wavelength limit, Andy Resnick, 2005/11/09
- Re: Beating the sub-wavelength limit, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/09
Double slit experiment questions, David Wimp, 2005/11/09
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Double slit experiment questions, Dr Photon, 2005/11/10
    - Re: Double slit experiment questions, Androcles, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Double slit experiment questions, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Double slit experiment questions, Androcles, 2005/11/10
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Double slit experiment questions, David Wimp, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Double slit experiment questions, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Double slit experiment questions, David Wimp, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Double slit experiment questions, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Double slit experiment questions A million holes and 1 photon, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Double slit experiment questions A million holes and 1 photon, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Double slit experiment questions A million holes and 1 photon, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Double slit experiment questions A million holes and 1 photon, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/12
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Old Man, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Double slit experiment questions, Eugene Stefanovich, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Double slit experiment questions, Old Man, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Double slit experiment questions, Eugene Stefanovich, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Double slit experiment questions, Old Man, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Double slit experiment questions, Eugene Stefanovich, 2005/11/10
Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/09
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, CWatters, 2005/11/09
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/09
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/09
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/10
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, ytyourclothes, 2005/11/10
  - Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/10
  - Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, CWatters, 2005/11/10
    - Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/13
  - Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, ytyourclothes, 2005/11/21
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, Charles, 2005/11/10
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 753 November 9, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/09
- Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 753 November 9, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Bob Cain, 2005/11/10
Re: $$$$$make tons of cash EASY$$$$$, Matthew Lybanon, 2005/11/09
Galilean referential?, dreed, 2005/11/09
- Re: Galilean referential?, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Galilean referential?, Androcles, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Galilean referential?, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Galilean referential?, Androcles, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Galilean referential?, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Galilean referential?, Androcles, 2005/11/10
Re: Attraction VS geometry, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/09
- Re: Attraction VS geometry, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/09
- Re: Attraction VS geometry, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/12
- Re: Attraction VS geometry, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/13
- Re: Attraction VS geometry, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/13
PROTON mass mp CODATA standard NEW SI GUESS iSS ..definition:, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/09
- Re: PROTON mass mp CODATA standard NEW SI GUESS iSS ..definition:, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/09
Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, vector, 2005/11/09
- Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, Dr Photon, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, vector, 2005/11/11
    - Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, Dr Photon, 2005/11/14
- Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, Eugene Stefanovich, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, Dr Photon, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, Eugene Stefanovich, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, xinyongfu, 2005/11/15
virtual photon ?, DARTH VADER, 2005/11/09
- Re: virtual photon ?, Greysky, 2005/11/09
  - Re: virtual photon ?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/09
What will happen?, DARTH VADER, 2005/11/09
- Re: What will happen?, Randy Poe, 2005/11/09
- Re: What will happen?, Old Man, 2005/11/10
Anisotropic 3D space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/09
- Re: Anisotropic 3D space, Androcles, 2005/11/09
- Re: Anisotropic 3D space, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/09
- Re: Anisotropic 3D space, Old Man, 2005/11/10
Kansas redefines science, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/09
- Re: Kansas redefines science, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/09
- Kansas redefines science & Stupid design, hanson, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Kansas redefines science & Stupid design, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Kansas redefines science & Stupid design, hanson, 2005/11/09
      
      Social mores., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Social mores., donstockbauer, 2005/11/11
      
      Stockbauer, Why don't you just reply to the article you're quoting from ?, Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/11
Stupid Design., Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/09
- Re: Stupid Design., Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/09
- Re: Stupid Design., Harry, 2005/11/09
- Re: Stupid Design., Ale, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Stupid Design., Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Stupid Design., Ale, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Stupid Design., John Christiansen, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Stupid Design., MissSouth, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Stupid Design., Harry, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Stupid Design., Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Stupid Design., Harry, 2005/11/10
  - Re: Stupid Design., Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Stupid Design., pete, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Stupid Design., Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Stupid Design., Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Stupid Design., pete, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Stupid Design., Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Stupid Design., pete, 2005/11/10
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 2005/11/09
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Lloyd Parker, 2005/11/09
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 2005/11/11
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 2005/11/13
  - Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, donstockbauer, 2005/11/13
  - Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Lloyd Parker, 2005/11/14
    - Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 2005/11/21
Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Nick, 2005/11/09
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Nick, 2005/11/10
    - Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Themistocles, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/14
  - Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, shevek, 2005/11/11
    - Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Bilge, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Themistocles, 2005/11/14
    - Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Tom Roberts, 2005/11/14
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/09
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/12
F = m^(c1) a^(c2) Overrides Newton's F = ma for m constant, OsherD, 2005/11/09
Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 4: px = ?, OsherD, 2005/11/08
- Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 4: px = ?, OsherD, 2005/11/09
Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/08
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Nick, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, mmeron, 2005/11/08
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, CWatters, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, carlip-nospam, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/11/10
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, john_ramsden, 2005/11/10
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Ian Parker, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Ian Parker, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, hanson, 2005/11/11
      
      Births and deaths are notional, and mostly the product of outside forces., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/12
      
      Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/11
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Dr Photon, 2005/11/09
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Michael J. Strickland, 2005/11/09
A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), iwicom, 2005/11/08
- Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), Androcles, 2005/11/08
  - Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), Bob Cain, 2005/11/09
    - Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), Androcles, 2005/11/09
    - Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), thetruthteller, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo) - Response to Gary Sokolich, Bob Cain, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo) - Response to Gary Sokolich, Gary Sokolich, 2005/11/10
- Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), Mark Martin, 2005/11/09
  - Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), CWatters, 2005/11/09
    - Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), tadchem, 2005/11/09
- A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), iwicom, 2005/11/08
Re: The End of Zombie Science, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/11/08
- Re: The End of Zombie Science, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/09
The USENET Planet of the Apes (was: River of shit), markwh04, 2005/11/08
Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, markwh04, 2005/11/08
Re: Minimum Travel Times to Other Parts of the Universe, markwh04, 2005/11/08
- Re: Minimum Travel Times to Other Parts of the Universe, donstockbauer, 2005/11/08
Re: What are UFOs, markwh04, 2005/11/08
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 2005/11/09
- Re: What are UFOs, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/30
TomGee and the Einstein Centennial, PD, 2005/11/08
Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 3: Time As Causation, OsherD, 2005/11/08
- Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 3: Time As Causation, OsherD, 2005/11/08
Question about random number generation, carkaci, 2005/11/08
- Re: Question about random number generation, Graham Jones, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Question about random number generation, carkaci, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Question about random number generation, Graham Jones, 2005/11/09
Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, W. Watson, 2005/11/08
- Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, mmeron, 2005/11/08
- Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, Steven Gray, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, W. Watson, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, W. Watson, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, Steven Gray, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, W. Watson, 2005/11/11
Re: MICROSATELLITES; how small? How cheap?, Rene Tschaggelar, 2005/11/08
- Re: MICROSATELLITES; how small? How cheap?, Brad Guth, 2005/11/08
- Re: MICROSATELLITES; how small? How cheap?, Brad Guth, 2005/11/10
- Re: MICROSATELLITES; how small? How cheap?, Brad Guth, 2005/11/10
Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, john0714@xxxxxxx, 2005/11/08
- Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, tadchem, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, CWatters, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/09
- Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, PD, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, CWatters, 2005/11/08
- Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, Androcles, 2005/11/08
electromagnetism, krishna, 2005/11/08
- Re: electromagnetism, Greg Neill, 2005/11/08
- Re: electromagnetism, Dr Photon, 2005/11/08
  - Re: electromagnetism, krishna, 2005/11/09
    - Re: electromagnetism, Dr Photon, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: electromagnetism, krishna, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: electromagnetism, Dr Photon, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: electromagnetism, krishna, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: electromagnetism, Dr Photon, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: electromagnetism, Black Knight, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: electromagnetism, Orion, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: electromagnetism, krishna, 2005/11/15
- Re: electromagnetism, Old Man, 2005/11/08
- Re: electromagnetism, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/09
- Re: electromagnetism, machiraju . chaitanya, 2005/11/09
the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, a_plutonium, 2005/11/08
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, tadchem, 2005/11/08
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, CWatters, 2005/11/08
  - Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, a_plutonium, 2005/11/08
  - Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, tadchem, 2005/11/08
  - Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, Ian Macmillan, 2005/11/09
    - Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/09
    - Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, a_plutonium, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, Paul E. Bennett, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, a_plutonium, 2005/11/10
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, PD, 2005/11/08
Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 2: Phase Interpretation, OsherD, 2005/11/08
- Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 2: Phase Interpretation, OsherD, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 2: Phase Interpretation, OsherD, 2005/11/08
impact resistance, Turman, 2005/11/08
- Re: impact resistance, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/11/08
  - Re: impact resistance, Turman, 2005/11/08
- impact resistance, Turman, 2005/11/08
  - Re: impact resistance, CWatters, 2005/11/08
    - Re: impact resistance, Turman, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, Turman, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, John Popelish, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, Turman, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, PD, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, CWatters, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, mmeron, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, PD, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, mmeron, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, PD, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, mmeron, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, CWatters, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, mmeron, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, Ken Muldrew, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, mmeron, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: impact resistance, Turman, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: impact resistance, mmeron, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: impact resistance, Turman, 2005/11/11
Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 2005/11/07
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Sue..., 2005/11/07
  - Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Light is a DUAL wave, donstockbauer, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Sue..., 2005/11/08
  - Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Androcles, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Sue..., 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Sue..., 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 2005/11/24
      
      Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Sue..., 2005/11/25
      
      Re: Light is a DUAL wave, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/29
      
      Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Sue..., 2005/11/25
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Alien Diaper Rocket, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 2005/11/10
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 2005/11/10
Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/07
- Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/07
  - Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation, donstockbauer, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 2005/11/08
What is it about matter that slows light? Permittivity and Permeability Of matter's EM field, Nick, 2005/11/07
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light? Permittivity and Permeability Of matter's EM field, Sue..., 2005/11/07
  - Re: What is it about matter that slows light? Permittivity and Permeability Of matter's EM field, Nick, 2005/11/07
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light? Permittivity and Permeability Of matter's EM field, Peter, 2005/11/08
Re: Consider the electron as a union of two halves!!, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/07
Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 2005/11/07
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/07
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Sue..., 2005/11/07
  - Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 2005/11/07
    - Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Sue..., 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Sue..., 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Sue..., 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, T Wake, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Peter, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Peter, 2005/11/16
      
      Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 2005/11/24
  - Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Androcles, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Sue..., 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Androcles, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Sue..., 2005/11/09
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/09
Reading for turbulent supefluid ether people, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/07
Re: Infinity Problems in QM, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/07
- Re: Infinity Problems in QM, markwh04, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Infinity Problems in QM, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/09
- Re: Infinity Problems in QM, tttpppggg, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Infinity Problems in QM, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Infinity Problems in QM, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Infinity Problems in QM, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Infinity Problems in QM, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Infinity Problems in QM, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/09
How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Nick, 2005/11/07
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/07
  - Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Nick, 2005/11/08
    - Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Nick, 2005/11/24
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/08
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Sue..., 2005/11/08
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/09
  - Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, tadchem, 2005/11/09
    - Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/11
  - Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Nick, 2005/11/10
Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 2005/11/07
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Henry Haapalainen, 2005/11/07
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Starbles, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 2005/11/10
      
      Message not available
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Steve Ralph, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, stephen, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, tadchem, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Androcles, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, tadchem, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Black Knight, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Bob Cain, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Black Knight, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, stephen, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Double-A, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 2005/11/11
      
      Message not available
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Black Knight, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, PD, 2005/11/14
      
      Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 2005/11/10
    - Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 2005/11/08
- Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 2005/11/07
Re: Lying fkasner strikes again: Grant Awarded for Solar Hydrogen Generation, platopes, 2005/11/07
- Re: Lying fkasner strikes again: Grant Awarded for Solar Hydrogen Generation, hanson, 2005/11/07
Free web based seminar on spectroscopy, hannahvfromdublin, 2005/11/07
Re: It's a pity ain't it, John Black, 2005/11/07
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Tice with a J, 2005/11/07
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, PD, 2005/11/08
  - Re: It's a pity ain't it, tadchem, 2005/11/08
    - Re: It's a pity ain't it, Proginoskes, 2005/11/08
    - Re: It's a pity ain't it, operator jay, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it, PD, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it, tadchem, 2005/11/09
    - Re: It's a pity ain't it, Bob Cain, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it, uuu, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it - Response to Gary Sokolich, Bob Cain, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it - Response to Bob Cain, Gary Sokolich, 2005/11/19
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it - Response to Bob Cain, Androcles, 2005/11/19
    - Re: It's a pity ain't it, Don1, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it, Double-A, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it, Don1, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it, Don1, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it, Don1, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: It's a pity ain't it, tadchem, 2005/11/09
China to land on moon in 2017 and get helium 3 for power.., Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/07
World Holidays of 7Nov and 14Dec; Happy Plutonium Day, a_plutonium, 2005/11/07
- Re: World Holidays of 7Nov and 14Dec; Happy Plutonium Day, a_plutonium, 2005/11/08
  - Re: World Holidays of 7Nov and 14Dec; Happy Plutonium Day, Attila the Bum, 2005/11/08
    - Re: World Holidays of 7Nov and 14Dec; Happy Plutonium Day, Attila the Bum, 2005/11/08
Inertia never changes, Don1, 2005/11/07
- Re: Inertia never changes, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/07
  - Re: Inertia never changes, Don1, 2005/11/07
    - Re: Inertia never changes, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/08
- Re: Inertia never changes, 888, 2005/11/07
  - Re: Inertia never changes, Paul Cardinale, 2005/11/07
  - Re: Inertia never changes, John Christiansen, 2005/11/07
  - Re: Inertia never changes, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/07
- Re: Inertia never changes, Double-A, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Inertia never changes, Don1, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Inertia never changes, Double-A, 2005/11/08
- Re: Inertia never changes, Nick, 2005/11/08
- Re: Inertia never changes, odin, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Inertia never changes, Don1, 2005/11/09
- Re: Inertia never changes, odin, 2005/11/10
  - Re: Inertia never changes, RP, 2005/11/10
Hurricanes can spawn tornadoes, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/07
- Re: Hurricanes can spawn tornadoes, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/08
Warmer Seas, Wetter Air Make Harder Rains as Greenhouse Gases Build, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/07
- Re: Warmer Seas, Wetter Air Make Harder Rains as Greenhouse Gases Build, jimp, 2005/11/07
  - Re: Warmer Seas, Wetter Air Make Harder Rains as Greenhouse Gases Build, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/07
E**2=m**2+p**2?, W. Watson, 2005/11/07
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/07
  - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/07
    - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/08
  - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/07
    - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/08
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/07
  - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, W. Watson, 2005/11/07
    - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, W. Watson, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/08
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, vector, 2005/11/07
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/07
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 2005/11/07
  - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 2005/11/07
    - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 2005/11/08
  - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/07
    - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/07
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/08
  - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, jcon, 2005/11/07
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Androcles, 2005/11/07
  - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/07
  - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 2005/11/07
    - Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Androcles, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Androcles, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Androcles, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Randy Poe, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/08
Proca's Extended Maxwell Equations with magnetic monopoles?, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 2005/11/07
- Re: Proca's Extended Maxwell Equations with magnetic monopoles?, vector, 2005/11/07
  - Re: Proca's Extended Maxwell Equations with magnetic monopoles?, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 2005/11/07
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 07, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2005/11/07
911 physics. War on terror fraud., Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer, 2005/11/07
- Re: 911 physics. War on terror fraud., donstockbauer, 2005/11/07
- Re: 911 physics. War on terror fraud., CWatters, 2005/11/07
Re: On the LaserLune Data, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/07
November Caption, Null, 2005/11/07
Re: force, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/07
New SI GUESS, iNTRiNSiC REST energy, eM ..frame-of-reference: 1. Equivalent iNTRiNSiC TEST REST mass, cavity (n) = mD / m1. 2. Energy, eK is the photo-electric effect ionization energy. 3. Let eM equal PROTON mass, mp ..to see 3 QUARK definitions. This is the General Universal EQUATiON of State System GUESS., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/07
What happens when space expands?, David Wimp, 2005/11/07
- Re: What happens when space expands?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/07
- Re: What happens when space expands?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/07
  - Re: What happens when space expands?, David Wimp, 2005/11/07
- Re: What happens when space expands?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/11
- Re: What happens when space expands?, Nick, 2005/11/11
  - Re: What happens when space expands?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/12
confusing page on Wien's displacement; also question between matter-energy and radiation, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/07
- Re: confusing page on Wien's displacement; also question between matter-energy and radiation, Jim Black, 2005/11/07
  - Re: confusing page on Wien's displacement; also question between matter-energy and radiation, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/07
Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/07
- Re: Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents, donstockbauer, 2005/11/07
  - Re: Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/07
- Re: Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/07
  - Re: Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/07
    - Re: Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents, OsherD, 2005/11/07
Re: Re-aligning astronomical principles, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/07
Naked Singularity Via Reissner-Nordstrom and Gibbons-Maeda-Garfinkle-Horowitz-Strominger, OsherD, 2005/11/06
- Re: Naked Singularity Via Reissner-Nordstrom and Gibbons-Maeda-Garfinkle-Horowitz-Strominger, OsherD, 2005/11/06
Feynman on video?, Brett, 2005/11/06
- Re: Feynman on video?, Dr Photon, 2005/11/07
  - Re: Feynman on video?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/07
  - Re: Feynman on video?, Brett, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Feynman on video?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/09
Re: Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/06
Re: Sailing on air, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/06
Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 4: N > 1, OsherD, 2005/11/06
Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 3: Postulates of Budiyono, OsherD, 2005/11/06
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 3: Postulates of Budiyono, donstockbauer, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 3: Postulates of Budiyono, OsherD, 2005/11/06
    - Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 3: Postulates of Budiyono, OsherD, 2005/11/06
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 3: Postulates of Budiyono, OsherD, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 3: Postulates of Budiyono, OsherD, 2005/11/06
Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details, OsherD, 2005/11/06
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details, donstockbauer, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details, OsherD, 2005/11/06
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details, OsherD, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details, OsherD, 2005/11/06
Re: Uncle Al found dead in suburban LA, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/06
- Re: Uncle Al found dead in suburban LA, Will Janoschka, 2005/11/06
Gravitational Waves, matt271829-news, 2005/11/06
- Re: Gravitational Waves, bartoszszczesny@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Gravitational Waves, matt271829-news, 2005/11/06
    - Re: Gravitational Waves, Ian Parker, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Gravitational Waves, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/07
  - Re: Gravitational Waves, Androcles, 2005/11/06
    - Re: Gravitational Waves, bartoszszczesny@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/07
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/06
- Re: Gravitational Waves, jonathan, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Gravitational Waves, Mark Martin, 2005/11/06
    - Re: Gravitational Waves, Pat Flannery, 2005/11/06
      
      Message not available
      
      Top ten ways you know it's time to put the keyboard down..., Tom Cuddihy, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Gravitational Waves, donstockbauer, 2005/11/06
    - Re: Gravitational Waves, jonathan, 2005/11/06
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Gravitational Waves, matt271829-news, 2005/11/06
    - Re: Gravitational Waves, Ian Parker, 2005/11/06
    - Re: Gravitational Waves, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Gravitational Waves, matt271829-news, 2005/11/07
    - Re: Gravitational Waves, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/08
- Re: Gravitational Waves, jambaugh, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Gravitational Waves, Ian Parker, 2005/11/07
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Gravitational Waves, Ian Parker, 2005/11/09
- Re: Gravitational Waves, PD, 2005/11/07
Re: The absolute aging of the twins, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/06
space probe query, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/06
- Re: space probe query, Mark Martin, 2005/11/06
- Re: space probe query, jambaugh, 2005/11/06
  - Re: space probe query, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/06
Re: dark matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/06
Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 2005/11/06
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, T Wake, 2005/11/06
  - Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 2005/11/07
    - Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, T Wake, 2005/11/07
      
      tj's 1st peddler attempt with Gold, hanson, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: tj's 1st peddler attempt with Gold, tj Frazir, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: tj's 1st peddler attempt with Gold, T Wake, 2005/11/08
      
      tj's 2nd peddler attempt with Gold, hanson, 2005/11/08
    - Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, James "Kibo" Parry, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, Mark Edwards, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, Joseph Michael Bay, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, T Wake, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: tj is still insane, T Wake, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: tj is still insane, tj Frazir, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: tj is still insane, T Wake, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: tj is still insane, tj Frazir, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: tj is still insane, T Wake, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: tj spews more rubbish, T Wake, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 2005/11/10
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 2005/11/06
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 2005/11/06
Re: Pioneer 10 looks like red shift, not blue, donstockbauer, 2005/11/06
'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, mike3, 2005/11/06
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/06
  - Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, mike3, 2005/11/07
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, T Wake, 2005/11/06
  - Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/06
- Freedom is notional. _Unmeasurables_, Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/06
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/06
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/06
  - Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, hanson, 2005/11/06
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, Jason Lang, 2005/11/06
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, Geoff Edwards, 2005/11/06
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/06
Cauchy's monopole.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/06
Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/06
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/06
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge, Androcles, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/06
New Horizon pluto mission might investigate Pioneer 10 anomaly, franklinhu, 2005/11/06
Photon-photon interactions, mark . hagerman, 2005/11/06
- Re: Photon-photon interactions, Brad Guth, 2005/11/06
- Re: Photon-photon interactions, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Photon-photon interactions, mark . hagerman, 2005/11/07
    - Re: Photon-photon interactions, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/10
- Re: Photon-photon interactions, Old Man, 2005/11/06
Light and the inflationary epoch, Nick, 2005/11/05
- Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, Nick, 2005/11/07
    - Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, Nick, 2005/11/08
    - Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, T Wake, 2005/11/07
- Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, Ilja Schmelzer, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, Nick, 2005/11/10
Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 2005/11/05
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/06
    - Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 2005/11/06
Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy 2: Knowledge vs Mass, OsherD, 2005/11/05
- Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy 2: Knowledge vs Mass, OsherD, 2005/11/05
The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Don1, 2005/11/05
- Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/05
- Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Proginoskes, 2005/11/05
  - Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Don1, 2005/11/06
    - Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/06
  - Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Robert Low, 2005/11/06
    - Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Lee Rudolph, 2005/11/06
- Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Steve Ralph, 2005/11/06
- Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Jim, 2005/11/07
Hubble Prospects For Resources on The Moon, Mike, 2005/11/05
- Re: Hubble Prospects For Resources on The Moon, Androcles, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Hubble Prospects For Resources on The Moon, Mike, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Hubble Prospects For Resources on The Moon, Androcles, 2005/11/06
Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy, OsherD, 2005/11/05
- Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy, OsherD, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy, OsherD, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy, OsherD, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy, macromitch, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy, OsherD, 2005/11/06
Dirk, There is no math God., brodix, 2005/11/05
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., Greg Neill, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Dirk, There is no math God., Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Dirk, There is no math God., brodix, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Dirk, There is no math God., brodix, 2005/11/05
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., Androcles, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Dirk, There is no math God., Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/05
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., macromitch, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Dirk, There is no math God., brodix, 2005/11/05
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., PD, 2005/11/07
Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 3: Solving for Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/05
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 3: Solving for Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 3: Solving for Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 3: Solving for Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/05
Re: Getting Burned by Bad Science, Attila the Bum, 2005/11/05
Question: about relation between particle exchange symmetry and angular momentum, dreameration, 2005/11/05
- Re: Question: about relation between particle exchange symmetry and angular momentum, Old Man, 2005/11/05
Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, David Wimp, 2005/11/05
- Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, David Wimp, 2005/11/05
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, Orion, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, Old Man, 2005/11/06
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/06
Climbing a Watery Slope, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/05
Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/05
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/05
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Ian Parker, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Ian Parker, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/05
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, donstockbauer, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/06
Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 2005/11/05
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Lloyd Parker, 2005/11/06
  - Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 2005/11/11
    - Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/11
    - Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Lloyd Parker, 2005/11/11
      
      Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 2005/11/21
      
      Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/29
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 2005/11/09
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 4 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/05
Einstein paper turns up on arXiv, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/05
strange-hi fi sci., daksh, 2005/11/05
- strange-hi fi sci., daksh, 2005/11/05
Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, payam79bb@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/05
- Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, Charles, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/05
- Stephen Hawking's thoughts on God., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Stephen Hawking's thoughts on God., payam79bb@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/06
    - Re: Stephen Hawking's thoughts on God., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/06
- Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, Jim O'Reilly, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, DaWasa, 2005/11/06
    - Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/07
Mystery of a Coin, kuttu, 2005/11/05
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, CWatters, 2005/11/05
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, kuttu, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Mystery of a Coin, donstockbauer, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Mystery of a Coin, cutescience, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Mystery of a Coin, Androcles, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Mystery of a Coin, Androcles, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Mystery of a Coin, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Mystery of a Coin, Charles, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Mystery of a Coin, Androcles, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Mystery of a Coin, kuttu, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Mystery of a Coin, Androcles, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Mystery of a Coin, kuttu, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Mystery of a Coin, Black Knight, 2005/11/15
      
      Re: Mystery of a Coin, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/15
    - Re: Mystery of a Coin, pete, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Mystery of a Coin, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Mystery of a Coin, tadchem, 2005/11/15
  - Re: Mystery of a Coin, David Canzi -- non-mailable, 2005/11/08
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, Androcles, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Mystery of a Coin, donstockbauer, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Mystery of a Coin, kuttu, 2005/11/05
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/06
Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations, OsherD, 2005/11/05
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations, OsherD, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations, OsherD, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations, OsherD, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations, OsherD, 2005/11/05
Re: What is dark matter, tj Frazir, 2005/11/04
- Randomness is notional, not physical. Freedom is notional., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/09
- Re: What is dark matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/05
  - Re: What is dark matter, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/05
    - Re: What is dark matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: What is dark matter, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: What is dark matter, Orion, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: What is dark matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: What is dark matter, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: What is dark matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/09
  - Re: What is dark matter, hanson, 2005/11/05
Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science, TomGee, 2005/11/04
- Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science, Androcles, 2005/11/05
- Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science, StpNrrs, 2005/11/05
- Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science, StpNrrs, 2005/11/05
  - Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science, shuba, 2005/11/05
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/04
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC, OsherD, 2005/11/04
  - Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC, jcon, 2005/11/04
    - Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC, OsherD, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC, jcon, 2005/11/07
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/04
Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again, OsherD, 2005/11/04
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again, OsherD, 2005/11/04
  - Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again, OsherD, 2005/11/04
    - Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again, OsherD, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/05
Does Ur Coockk Hard Enough? ReUgWh, donstockbauer, 2005/11/04
Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, blackboab, 2005/11/04
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/04
  - Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, blackboab, 2005/11/04
    - Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, PD, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Androcles, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, T Wake, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, PD, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/06
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Old Man, 2005/11/04
  - Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, blackboab, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Greg Neill, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Old Man, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Androcles, 2005/11/05
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, macromitch, 2005/11/04
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, tadchem, 2005/11/05
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/05
Hamilton: two mysteries solved, John Baez, 2005/11/04
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Lee Rudolph, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, John Baez, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, PiSigma, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Lee Rudolph, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Dik T. Winter, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, John Baez, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Peter T. Daniels, 2005/11/07
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, John Baez, 2005/11/09
    - Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Dik T. Winter, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, john_ramsden, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Dave Rusin, 2005/11/06
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Hero, 2005/11/06
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, tdp1001, 2005/11/29
Re: Falling in curves, gwh, 2005/11/04
- Re: Falling in curves, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/04
Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/04
- Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, tadchem, 2005/11/04
  - Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, Schoenfeld, 2005/11/04
- Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, shevek, 2005/11/04
  - Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, Eugene Stefanovich, 2005/11/04
    - Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
How to determine the scale of an arbitrary object., Lefty, 2005/11/04
Re: River of shit, Samu Aalto, 2005/11/04
CORRECTED energy e=mass*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*length/c^2; Where *length* CAN BE *UNiT* volume/surface area quotient, DiAMETER/6 for a SPHERE, EDGElength/6 for a CUBE and Tip-to-Tip DiSTANCE/6 for a TRiAKiS-icosahedral CORE CRYSTAL (20 lattice-unit cells)., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/04
- Re: CORRECTED energy e=mass*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*length/c^2; Where *length* CAN BE *UNiT* volume/surface area quotient, DiAMETER/6 for a SPHERE, EDGElength/6 for a CUBE and Tip-to-Tip DiSTANCE/6 for a TRiAKiS-icosahedral CORE CRYSTAL (20 lattice-unit cells)., Fred Stevens, 2005/11/04
Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 2005/11/04
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Clemens W, 2005/11/04
  - Re: Mass vs inertia, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/05
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Double-A, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Double-A, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, PD, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, PD, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, donstockbauer, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Double-A, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Mass vs inertia, PD, 2005/11/07
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Y.Porat, 2005/11/05
  - Re: Mass vs inertia, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Mass vs inertia, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 2005/11/05
emr vision / radio telescopes, Mike, 2005/11/04
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/04
  - Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Mike, 2005/11/04
    - Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, tadchem, 2005/11/04
    - Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, donstockbauer, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Mike, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Androcles, 2005/11/05
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Starlord, 2005/11/04
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/04
  - Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Starlord, 2005/11/04
    - Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Starlord, 2005/11/04
  - Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/04
    - Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/04
Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 2005/11/04
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 2005/11/04
Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork Moon's First Restrant, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/04
CORRECTiON: e=RESTmass*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*meter/c^2., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/04
Phase Changes Via Riccati To QM/QFT and Superluminal, OsherD, 2005/11/04
- Re: Phase Changes Via Riccati To QM/QFT and Superluminal, OsherD, 2005/11/04
  - Re: Phase Changes Via Riccati To QM/QFT and Superluminal, OsherD, 2005/11/04
    - Re: Phase Changes Via Riccati To QM/QFT and Superluminal, OsherD, 2005/11/04
Synthetic Telepathy and NDE's., Raktizer Omheit, 2005/11/03
Re: the behind closed doors fascim tricks, tj Frazir, 2005/11/03
Re: the chopstick and fork can from china others used hands, tj Frazir, 2005/11/03
Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, macromitch, 2005/11/03
- Re: Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, xxein, 2005/11/03
- Re: Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, Eugene Stefanovich, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, xxein, 2005/11/05
- Re: Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, Bilge, 2005/11/06
Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunt..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/03
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunt..., maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunt..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/04
Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 2005/11/03
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 2005/11/03
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 2005/11/03
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 2005/11/03
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/04
  - Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 2005/11/04
    - Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 2005/11/04
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 2005/11/04
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, John Baez, 2005/11/07
  - Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, Androcles, 2005/11/08
Lorentz construction, EugeniuszW, 2005/11/03
- Re: Lorentz contruction, EugeniuszW, 2005/11/03
Silicon chip puts the brakes on light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/03
- Re: Silicon chip puts the brakes on light, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/04
Ordinarily, every particle in quantum theory is neatly classified as either a boson or a fermion, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/03
Following Up Sarfatti, OsherD, 2005/11/03
Re: Can you get out of a black hole?, Don1, 2005/11/03
- Re: Can you get out of a black hole?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Can you get out of a black hole?, Al Zenner, 2005/11/03
    - Re: Can you get out of a black hole?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/03
    - Re: Can you get out of a black hole?, linear regression, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Can you get out of a black hole?, macromitch, 2005/11/03
BOYLES law UNDER GRAVITATION, NILS B�RJESSON, 2005/11/03
BOYLE law under GRVITATION, NILS B�RJESSON, 2005/11/03
Fourier analysis Q, bill, 2005/11/03
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/03
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/03
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Old Man, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Fourier analysis Q, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/04
    - Re: Fourier analysis Q, Old Man, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Fourier analysis Q, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Fourier analysis Q, Old Man, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Fourier analysis Q, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/06
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, tadchem, 2005/11/04
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Randy Poe, 2005/11/04
Bottlecap-tire pessure, Greysky, 2005/11/03
- Re: Bottlecap-tire pessure, Lefty, 2005/11/04
  - Re: Bottlecap-tire pessure, donstockbauer, 2005/11/03
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Bottlecap-tire pessure, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Bottlecap-tire pessure, Lefty, 2005/11/04
Scientists Design Tiny Brake to Quicken Communications, Jan Panteltje, 2005/11/03
Quantum Mechanics calculations for an undergraduate?, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 2005/11/03
- Re: Quantum Mechanics calculations for an undergraduate?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Quantum Mechanics calculations for an undergraduate?, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/03
- Re: Quantum Mechanics calculations for an undergraduate?, carlip-nospam, 2005/11/03
the law agrees that the agreement doesn't belong in the group of laws, dedanoe, 2005/11/03
Beginner 4CH Electric RC Helicopter For Sale - Easy to fly, GTY, 2005/11/03
- Re: Beginner 4CH Electric RC Helicopter For Sale - Easy to fly, donstockbauer, 2005/11/03
Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, Allen L. Barker, 2005/11/03
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, tj Frazir, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, hanson, 2005/11/04
    - Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, Allen L. Barker, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, tj Frazir, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, tj Frazir, 2005/11/04
- Message not available
  - Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, Allen L. Barker, 2005/11/04
    - Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, mmeron, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, Allen L. Barker, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, mmeron, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, tj Frazir, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, tj Frazir, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, Allen L. Barker, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, mmeron, 2005/11/05
Sue ..ironically, is a blushing-red clock.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/03
- Re: Sue ..ironically, is a blushing-red clock.!!, donstockbauer, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Sue ..ironically, is a blushing-red clock.!!, Sue..., 2005/11/03
I give you my dynamic lever, dedanoe, 2005/11/03
- Re: I give you my dynamic lever, donstockbauer, 2005/11/03
- Re: I give you my dynamic lever, tadchem, 2005/11/03
Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 2005/11/03
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 2005/11/18
(SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 2005/11/03
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 2005/11/18
Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 2005/11/03
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 2005/11/18
Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 2005/11/03
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 2005/11/18
Light must expand at creation: the light year long photon, Nick, 2005/11/02
- Re: Light must expand at creation: the light year long photon, Sue..., 2005/11/03
  - Re: Light must expand at creation: the light year long photon, donstockbauer, 2005/11/03
- Re: Light must expand at creation: the light year long photon, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/03
BLUSHiNG and iRONY are BOTH exquisite EXAMPLEs ..withOUT FORCE, of ACTiON-at-a-DiSTANCE; And BOTH can be quite painfully-SiMPLE proof-of-EXiSTANCE, of the iRONiC blushing-RED ARROW of TiME.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/02
Re: Higgs Field, Particle = TG's DM Ether, Latent Particles, TomGee, 2005/11/02
What does acceleration do to inertia?, Nick, 2005/11/02
- Re: What does acceleration do to inertia?, macromitch, 2005/11/03
Re: Impossible, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/02
- Re: Impossible, EugeniuszW, 2005/11/03
signs of the first stars in the universe, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/02
- Re: signs of the first stars in the universe, glbrad01, 2005/11/03
Re: 377 ohms ?, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/02
atomic giga-frequency counters in real time, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/02
- Re: atomic giga-frequency counters in real time, donstockbauer, 2005/11/02
- Re: atomic giga-frequency counters in real time, Sue..., 2005/11/03
  - Re: atomic giga-frequency counters in real time, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/03
quantum consciousness idiocy, examachine, 2005/11/02
- Re: quantum consciousness idiocy, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/02
  - Re: quantum consciousness idiocy, ethon, 2005/11/02
  - Re: quantum consciousness idiocy, ethon, 2005/11/02
  - Re: quantum consciousness idiocy, examachine, 2005/11/03
    - Re: quantum consciousness idiocy, platopes, 2005/11/03
Re: George_Hammond cant be too bad what about you, tj Frazir, 2005/11/02
- Re: George_Hammond cant be too bad what about you, T Wake, 2005/11/03
Paper: Tracing the first stars with fluctuations of the cosmic infrared background, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/11/02
Articles: Early stars: lifting the veil, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/11/02
- Re: Articles: Early stars: lifting the veil, xxein, 2005/11/02
Article: Your nearest black hole? (a test for GR), Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/11/02
Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Painius, 2005/11/02
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Nick, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, T Wake, 2005/11/02
Re: Take my flu shot ... please!, tj Frazir, 2005/11/02
- Re: Take my flu shot ... please!, tj Frazir, 2005/11/02
Riccati-izable and Painleve-izable Equations, OsherD, 2005/11/02
- Re: Riccati-izable and Painleve-izable Equations, OsherD, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Riccati-izable and Painleve-izable Equations, OsherD, 2005/11/02
uncertainty, wave function, gmarkowsky, 2005/11/02
- Re: uncertainty, wave function, Nick, 2005/11/02
- Re: uncertainty, wave function, mmeron, 2005/11/02
- Re: uncertainty, wave function, Old Man, 2005/11/02
- Re: uncertainty, wave function, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/02
  - Re: uncertainty, wave function, gmarkowsky, 2005/11/03
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 752 November 2, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/02
Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/02
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Paul Cardinale, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Thoughts on time and space, ethon, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, ethon, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 2005/11/05
      
      Message not available
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, donstockbauer, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/05
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/04
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 2005/11/02
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 2005/11/03
  - Message not available
    - Re: Thoughts on time and space, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, donstockbauer, 2005/11/03
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/04
  - Re: Thoughts on time and space, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/04
    - Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/06
  - Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/04
    - Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Hero . van . Jindelt, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Hero . van . Jindelt, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, David Wimp, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 2005/11/05
Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Claudio Grondi, 2005/11/02
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/02
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, PD, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, tadchem, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Androcles, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, PD, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Androcles, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Claudio Grondi, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, platopes, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Androcles, 2005/11/03
    - Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, tadchem, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, tadchem, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Mark Fergerson, 2005/11/04
  - Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Eugene Stefanovich, 2005/11/02
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/03
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/02
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Androcles, 2005/11/02
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Nick, 2005/11/02
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Y.Porat, 2005/11/04
BIG BANG, Dogma Discharge, 2005/11/02
- Re: BIG BANG, tadchem, 2005/11/02
  - Re: BIG BANG, Dogma Discharge, 2005/11/02
    - Re: BIG BANG, tadchem, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: BIG BANG, tj Frazir, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: BIG BANG, Androcles, 2005/11/02
    - Re: BIG BANG, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: BIG BANG, Dogma Discharge, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: BIG BANG, tadchem, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: BIG BANG, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: BIG BANG, tadchem, 2005/11/03
  - Re: BIG BANG, Androcles, 2005/11/02
- Re: BIG BANG, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/02
  - Re: BIG BANG, Androcles, 2005/11/02
    - Re: BIG BANG, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: BIG BANG, FrediFizzx, 2005/11/04
Dynamics equally insane with Kinetics, dedanoe, 2005/11/02
- Re: Dynamics equally insane with Kinetics, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Dynamics equally insane with Kinetics, dedanoe, 2005/11/03
    - Re: Dynamics equally insane with Kinetics, Puppet_Sock, 2005/11/03
Call it how you please!, dedanoe, 2005/11/02
pole star, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/02
- Re: pole star, Androcles, 2005/11/02
Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/02
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/02
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/03
    - Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/09
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 2005/11/08
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, tj Frazir, 2005/11/02
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/04
    - Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/07
      
      Message not available
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Greg Neill, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Working Wrong Concepts, donstockbauer, 2005/11/08
  - Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/11/04
    - Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/04
  - Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 2005/11/04
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 2005/11/03
Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _Most_Worthy_., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/02
- Re: Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy's _Most_Worthy_., Thomas Wootten, 2005/11/02
  - How does one measure a mere perception ?, Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/02
    - Re: How does one measure a mere perception ?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: How does one measure a mere perception ?, operator jay, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: How does one measure a mere perception ?, High Plains Thumper, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: How does one measure a mere perception ?, Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/03
    - The articles with the most replies, in terms of lines, 5 levels deep., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/03
      
      The articles with the most replies, in terms of lines, 5 levels deep., Jeff_Relf, 2005/11/03
Re: Definitions of mass and force; A critique, brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/02
The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!! And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating REAL time., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/02
- The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!! And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating REAL time., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/02
  - Re: The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!! And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating REAL time., donstockbauer, 2005/11/02
Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync., brian a m stuckless, 2005/11/02
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync., Tom Roberts, 2005/11/02
The Inner Minds Eye Psychic Group, 3rdEyeInsight, 2005/11/02
Quantum Logic, GR "Logic", and Knowledge, OsherD, 2005/11/02
Re: Ultrasound Beyond the Speed of Light, Sam Wormley, 2005/11/01
Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/01
- Re: Infinity a Concept, AllYou!, 2005/11/02
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/01
  - Re: Infinity a Concept, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/03
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/01
  - Re: Infinity a Concept, bz, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, bz, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, donstockbauer, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, zuhair, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 2005/11/10
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/13
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 2005/11/02
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/19
  - Message not available
    - Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/19
- Re: Infinity a Concept, David R Tribble, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Infinity a Concept, pete, 2005/11/03
    - Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, pete, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, pete, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 2005/11/04
    - Re: Infinity a Concept, Virgil, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/03
- Re: Infinity a Concept, pete, 2005/11/04
  - Re: Infinity a Concept, donstockbauer, 2005/11/04
    - Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 2005/11/09
  - Re: Infinity a Concept, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/06
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/04
  - Re: Infinity a Concept, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/05
    - Re: Infinity a Concept, Ross A. Finlayson, 2005/11/06
    - Re: Infinity a Concept, David R Tribble, 2005/11/08
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, Happy Hippy, 2005/11/09
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Dante Alighieri, 2005/11/24
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Dante Alighieri, 2005/11/24
  - Re: Infinity a Concept, Robert Low, 2005/11/24
  - Re: Infinity a Concept, David Kastrup, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Infinity a Concept, Dante Alighieri, 2005/11/28
      
      Re: Infinity a Concept, Robert Low, 2005/11/28
  - Re: Infinity a Concept, William Hughes, 2005/11/24
    - Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/24
Neutrinos could close the universe, Nick, 2005/11/01
- Re: Neutrinos could close the universe, platopes, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Neutrinos could close the universe, Nick, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Neutrinos could close the universe, platopes, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Neutrinos could close the universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/11/02
- Re: Neutrinos could close the universe, Y.Porat, 2005/11/02
- Re: Neutrinos could close the universe, Eric Gisse, 2005/11/02
Tsallis Entropy As Exponential-like Rather Than Logarithmic, OsherD, 2005/11/01
- Re: Tsallis Entropy As Exponential-like Rather Than Logarithmic, OsherD, 2005/11/01
  - Re: Tsallis Entropy As Exponential-like Rather Than Logarithmic, OsherD, 2005/11/01
Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space? -- Einstein's gradual repudiation of space-time, Autymn D. C., 2005/11/01
Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/01
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/01
  - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/01
    - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, BruceS, 2005/11/21
  - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Jim Black, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Jim Black, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Jim Black, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Jim Black, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Jim Black, 2005/11/03
  - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, glbrad01, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
- Message not available
  - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 2005/11/02
  - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/02
    - Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, donstockbauer, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/02
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 2005/11/03
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/04
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/05
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/06
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 2005/11/07
      
      Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/11/07