sci.physics (date)
November 30, 2005
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 16:14
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 16:08
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 16:07
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 16:04
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Old Man, 16:04
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:03
- Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Randy Poe, 16:03
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 16:03
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 16:01
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx, 16:01
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, slehar, 15:56
- Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Steve Ralph, 15:51
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Old Man, 15:40
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Peter, 15:40
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, slehar, 15:40
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 15:37
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:12
- jumping on a trampoline with spring arcs on your feet, ik, 15:07
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 15:06
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 15:04
- Paper: Creation of a six-atom 'Schrödinger cat' state, Robert Karl Stonjek, 14:58
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Timo Nieminen, 14:57
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 14:56
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 14:49
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Tom Roberts, 14:48
- Re: Toroids, mmeron, 14:44
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Helmut Wabnig, 14:44
- Saturn's moon reveals its secrets, Sam Wormley, 14:11
- Re: Toroids, g, 14:07
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Helmut Wabnig, 14:00
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 13:45
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, stephen, 13:37
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 13:31
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, vern, 13:20
- Re: Singularities are ALL naked, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 13:17
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:16
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Jay R. Yablon, 13:15
- Re: Origin of forces, mmeron, 13:13
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sam Wormley, 13:13
- Re: energy derived from differential specific gravities?, barry, 13:12
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:06
- Re: Origin of forces, Y.Porat, 13:05
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, tadchem, 13:03
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Peter, 13:01
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:54
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, tadchem, 12:50
- Re: R.Feymann & the String Theory, Mark Martin, 12:49
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 12:45
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 12:34
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Old Man, 12:33
- Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Sam Wormley, 12:29
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 12:28
- Re: R.Feymann & the String Theory, Sam Wormley, 12:28
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, GSS, 12:25
- Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Don1, 12:20
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 756 November 30, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 12:16
- R.Feymann & the String Theory, Thierry Mella, 12:12
- Re: old papers, David Macmanus, 12:10
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, surrealistic-dream, 11:57
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, jpolasek, 11:54
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Peter, 11:52
- Re: Origin of forces, Peter, 11:39
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 11:37
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, surrealistic-dream, 11:28
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 11:26
- Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Don1, 11:26
- Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Eric Gisse, 11:23
- Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:20
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, surrealistic-dream, 11:19
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 11:05
- Re: Desktop Railgun, tadchem, 10:59
- Re: Acquiring papers, tadchem, 10:54
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, donstockbauer, 10:54
- "The Matter of "Dark Matter", X84, 10:53
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, Autymn D. C., 10:51
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Tom Roberts, 10:51
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Tom Roberts, 10:49
- Re: old papers, Matthew Lybanon, 10:25
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:24
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, surrealistic-dream, 10:23
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:19
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Androcles, 10:18
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Sue..., 10:12
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Peter, 10:10
- Re: Origin of forces, Andy Resnick, 10:10
- Re: Origin of forces, Peter, 10:06
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, zinnic, 10:02
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, jmfbahciv, 09:38
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje, 09:36
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:33
- Re: Debate on time travel paradoxes, ianparker2, 09:24
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:24
- Acquiring papers, Tolman, 08:52
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, tadchem, 08:46
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, tadchem, 08:39
- Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 08:16
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 08:12
- old papers, David Macmanus, 07:57
- Re: THE MECHANISM, donstockbauer, 07:55
- Re: Desktop Railgun, donstockbauer, 07:39
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Richard Schultz, 07:38
- Re: What are UFOs, Autymn D. C., 07:27
- Re: Desktop Railgun, panteltje, 07:02
- Re: Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:54
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 06:29
- Why did the metric system invent the newton anyway?, Don1, 06:21
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 06:15
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, Lloyd Parker, 05:27
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, Lloyd Parker, 05:25
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Bill Hobba, 05:25
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:18
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Autymn D. C., 05:02
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 04:43
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 04:41
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:36
- What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?, GSS, 04:36
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 04:32
- The Generalised Born Postulate, Zinc Potterman, 04:15
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Hubble, 04:15
- Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, Ian Parker, 04:03
- Re: Debate on time travel paradoxes, OsherD, 03:59
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker, 03:43
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 03:11
- Re: THE MECHANISM, R. Pierce Butler, 02:56
- Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Androcles, 02:48
- Uncountably Many Outside Universes As Modified Multiverses, OsherD, 02:36
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 02:27
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:06
- Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 02:02
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, stephen, 01:59
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, brian a m stuckless, 01:56
- Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 01:55
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 01:53
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu, 01:51
- THE MECHANISM, Kevan, 01:51
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 01:46
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 01:35
- Re: I LOVE YOU, Androcles, 01:33
- Re: Origin of forces, Androcles, 01:27
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, Androcles, 01:24
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., June R Harton, 01:20
- Re: Toroids, Androcles, 01:16
- Re: Origin of forces, Y.Porat, 01:06
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, salmonegg, 00:45
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Androcles, 00:39
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 00:33
- Re: energy derived from differential specific gravities?, Autymn D. C., 00:32
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Bill Hobba, 00:27
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 00:26
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
November 29, 2005
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:23
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 23:20
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:19
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:16
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron, 23:15
- Re: Debate on time travel paradoxes, donstockbauer, 23:11
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:09
- Re: Origin of forces, donstockbauer, 23:06
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:03
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Samsong, 23:03
- Re: Origin of forces, RP, 23:02
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, R. Pierce Butler, 22:54
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, vanep, 22:41
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson, 22:40
- Re: Debate on time travel paradoxes, Twittering One, 22:16
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Jay R. Yablon, 22:14
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 22:12
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 22:04
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 21:57
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Bill Hobba, 21:33
- Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, tj Frazir, 21:32
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 21:32
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Old Man, 21:19
- Re: photon size, tj Frazir, 21:17
- Re: Desktop Railgun, tj Frazir, 21:09
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Tristan Beeline, 21:07
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 21:06
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Androcles, 20:59
- Re: Origin of forces, Sam Wormley, 20:54
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Androcles, 20:54
- Re: Magnetic field problem, (a proof of uniqueness of field potential), Old Man, 20:53
- Origin of forces, Peter, 20:44
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, David Kastrup, 20:41
- Debate on time travel paradoxes, Jack Sarfatti, 20:37
- Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, deadland, 20:24
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Old Man, 20:21
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, tj Frazir, 20:18
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 20:17
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Androcles, 20:12
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, tj Frazir, 20:11
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, donstockbauer, 19:59
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, John Clark, 19:56
- Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, tj Frazir, 19:53
- Re: Singularities are ALL naked, Eric Gisse, 19:52
- Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Segin, 19:49
- Re: Singularities are ALL naked, Androcles, 19:30
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Jay R. Yablon, 19:25
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 19:16
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, vanep, 19:13
- Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, jaska, 19:12
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, Bruce Sinclair, 19:09
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 19:07
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 19:06
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Bill Hobba, 19:05
- Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 19:00
- Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????, Mark Martin, 18:57
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 18:57
- Re: UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, Mark Martin, 18:55
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 18:54
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Mark-T, 18:53
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 18:49
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 18:48
- Re: Singularities are ALL naked, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:46
- Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:39
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, David Kastrup, 18:31
- Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:29
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 18:23
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 18:22
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 18:18
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 18:09
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 18:08
- Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, tadchem, 18:03
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Ken S. Tucker, 18:03
- Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 17:51
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 17:39
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, CWatters, 17:28
- UNCHARGED ELECTRONS, rem460, 17:26
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Timo Nieminen, 17:18
- Re: I LOVE YOU, tadchem, 17:11
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 17:08
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 17:02
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 16:59
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 16:50
- Re: I LOVE YOU, Randy Poe, 16:47
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:37
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 9: Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 16:29
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 16:23
- Energy In The Knowledge Equation 9: Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD, 16:21
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 16:20
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, donstockbauer, 16:20
- Re: I LOVE YOU, Mark-T, 16:17
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Mark-T, 16:15
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 16:07
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, donstockbauer, 16:02
- Re: Toroids, Puppet_Sock, 15:51
- Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer, 15:45
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, hanson, 15:29
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 15:11
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Ken Muldrew, 15:08
- Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, Thomas Heger, 15:05
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 15:00
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje, 14:59
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 14:59
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje, 14:57
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, tadchem, 14:54
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 14:51
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Paul Cardinale, 14:48
- Re: Measure the state of quantum bits in a quantum computer without disturbing the state, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 14:46
- Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, tadchem, 14:28
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker, 14:12
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, tadchem, 14:08
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Singapura99, 13:57
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Puppet_Sock, 13:51
- Re: Toroids, donstockbauer, 13:27
- Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, PD, 13:27
- Re: Toroids, Puppet_Sock, 13:21
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Puppet_Sock, 13:11
- Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, CWatters, 13:07
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:48
- Re: Desktop Railgun, tj Frazir, 12:44
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, CWatters, 12:36
- Re: Discovering a greater cosmos and dwarfing Darwin's Theory_of_Evolution., Thomas Wootten, 12:34
- Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glo..., tj Frazir, 12:22
- Re: Amount of light from linear floodlamp bulb, tj Frazir, 12:12
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Traveler, 12:04
- Re: Discovering a greater cosmos and dwarfing Darwin's Theory_of_Evolution., chrisv, 12:02
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 11:57
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 11:56
- Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, Darkwing, 11:50
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:50
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Sue..., 11:42
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 11:36
- Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, tadchem, 11:34
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Autymn D. C., 11:33
- Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Sam Wormley, 11:25
- Re: Toroids, mmeron, 11:24
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 11:23
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, PD, 11:21
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 11:18
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 11:14
- "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", X84, 11:13
- Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Sam Wormley, 11:09
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Schoenfeld, 11:06
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 11:03
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 11:03
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:54
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 10:49
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:40
- Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Autymn D. C., 10:32
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, tadchem, 10:27
- Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Peter, 10:20
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Tom Roberts, 10:18
- Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, Schoenfeld, 10:18
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 10:14
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500, 10:09
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Tom Roberts, 10:08
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 10:07
- Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:04
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Eric Gisse, 10:04
- Re: Light slower than CG?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:54
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:53
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:51
- Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:51
- Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????, Mark Martin, 09:49
- Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, Mark Martin, 09:47
- Re: Give up Black Holes, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:45
- Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, Doug, 09:42
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:42
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, PD, 09:37
- Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:34
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 09:34
- Re: Discovering a greater cosmos and dwarfing Darwin's Theory_of_Evolution., Mark Martin, 09:34
- Re: FORCE OF GRAVITY IS AN ILLUSION, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:32
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, PD, 09:24
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 09:20
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, surrealistic-dream, 09:16
- Re: photon size, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:12
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, PD, 09:11
- Discovering a greater cosmos and dwarfing Darwin's Theory_of_Evolution., Jeff_Relf, 09:10
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, surrealistic-dream, 09:08
- Re: I LOVE YOU, tadchem, 09:04
- Re: There has never been an earthquake on Thanksgiving, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:03
- Re: Singularities are ALL naked, The Ghost In The Machine, 09:00
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, The Ghost In The Machine, 09:00
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, The Ghost In The Machine, 09:00
- Re: Toroids, Andy Resnick, 08:57
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500, 08:57
- Re: String theory?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:56
- Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick, 08:48
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 08:24
- Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 08:23
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Clemens W, 08:20
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje, 08:01
- Re: Question from reporter, The Ghost In The Machine, 08:00
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, The Ghost In The Machine, 08:00
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, tdp1001, 07:41
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, jmfbahciv, 07:15
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 07:05
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223), Han de Bruijn, 06:48
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 06:33
- Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, Androcles, 06:18
- Re: New theory vs. Big Bang, ianparker2, 06:02
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 05:47
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker, 05:32
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Helmut Wabnig, 05:18
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Harry, 05:11
- Re: Relativistic computation, Helmut Wabnig, 05:06
- Re: Relativistic computation, Dr Photon, 04:59
- Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 04:57
- Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, JimmyRigg, 04:53
- Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, JimmyRigg, 04:51
- Re: I LOVE YOU, Dogma Discharge, 04:26
- Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer, 04:22
- Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer, 04:20
- Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer, 04:18
- Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer, 04:17
- Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, nebula331, 04:16
- I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer, 04:13
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 03:59
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Hubble, 03:52
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 03:42
- Re: The Caliber of Debunkers Is Waning, donstockbauer, 03:39
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, donstockbauer, 03:36
- Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, donstockbauer, 03:20
- NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, G.L. Cross, 03:14
- Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, CWatters, 03:05
- Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, ?, 03:04
- Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Hubble, 02:58
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 02:57
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Androcles, 02:34
- Magnetic field problem, (a proof of uniqueness of field potential), Harry, 02:26
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Clemens W, 02:22
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu, 02:19
- Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Tice with a J, 02:09
- Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, Mathlete, 02:07
- What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan, 01:59
- Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY, 01:55
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Mike, 01:42
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD, 01:31
- Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:11
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD, 01:09
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD, 00:51
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD, 00:51
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 00:44
- Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD, 00:36
- Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Jay R. Yablon, 00:34
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 00:15
November 28, 2005
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 23:59
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Henri Wilson, 23:55
- Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, Sam Wormley, 23:54
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 23:51
- Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glom_On., donstockbauer, 23:46
- Why I included Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy., Jeff_Relf, 23:40
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson, 23:37
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 23:30
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:27
- Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, Bill Hobba, 23:14
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Androcles, 23:10
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Tice with a J, 23:04
- Re: Toroids, John Popelish, 23:02
- Toroids, Greg G, 22:48
- Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 22:43
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 22:02
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Mathlete, 22:02
- Re: Energy in the Knowledge Equation 7: Matter, Radiation, etc., OsherD, 22:01
- Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, Androcles, 21:36
- Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, hanson, 21:34
- Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, Doug, 21:33
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 21:28
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 21:18
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 21:10
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:09
- Re: String theory?, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:07
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:06
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 21:05
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Eric Gisse, 20:50
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 20:48
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:38
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Proginoskes, 20:31
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mathlete, 20:31
- Nick Herbert's critique of Ray Jensen's FTL signal idea, Jack Sarfatti, 20:16
- Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glom_On., John Bailo, 20:07
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:55
- Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, tj Frazir, 19:45
- Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, carlip-nospam, 19:43
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:42
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 19:41
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 19:36
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 19:32
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 19:31
- Re: Relativistic computation, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 19:28
- Re: String theory?, ?, 19:18
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:17
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Eric Gisse, 19:17
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 18:30
- New theory vs. Big Bang, jaska, 18:16
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Singapura99, 17:27
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, donstockbauer, 17:23
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, PD, 17:18
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 17:15
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Eric Gisse, 17:13
- Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, Tice with a J, 17:10
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 17:10
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, PD, 17:08
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 16:56
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 16:53
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 16:43
- Re: Energy in the Knowledge Equation 7: Matter, Radiation, etc., OsherD, 16:42
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Mike, 16:40
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 16:40
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Ken Muldrew, 16:39
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 16:32
- Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, Sam Wormley, 16:29
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 16:24
- Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, Tice with a J, 16:24
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, tadchem, 16:23
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:09
- Re: Relativistic computation, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:07
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:04
- Re: String theory?, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:53
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 15:48
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:37
- Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2, Helmut Wabnig, 15:34
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:17
- Energy in the Knowledge Equation 7: Matter, Radiation, etc., OsherD, 15:16
- Re: photon size, Strongheart, 15:15
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, arvee, 15:10
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:02
- EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, ACE, 15:01
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 14:49
- Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, richard miller, 14:46
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 14:44
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Mike, 14:43
- Re: photon size: correction, Old Man, 14:30
- Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, tadchem, 14:28
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 14:27
- Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, carlip-nospam, 14:24
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Ken S. Tucker, 14:20
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 14:20
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 14:14
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Ken Muldrew, 14:13
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Randy Poe, 14:12
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500, 14:01
- Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, Randy Poe, 13:53
- Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, Doug, 13:47
- DOE Sensitive Subjects, righton20052, 13:32
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Traveler, 13:16
- Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Sam Wormley, 12:58
- Re: Relativistic computation, Dr Photon, 12:54
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Randy Poe, 12:50
- Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, Darkwing, 12:48
- "Examining Mathematical Approaches", X84, 12:39
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 12:03
- On basic formalism of SR - 2, Sergey Karavashkin, 12:00
- Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glom_On., Mark Martin, 11:51
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Randy Poe, 11:42
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 11:41
- Energy In The Knowledge Equation 6: Baez and Neumaier, OsherD, 11:36
- Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glom_On., Thomas Wootten, 11:36
- Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Sam Wormley, 11:34
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Randy Poe, 11:31
- Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, John Griffin, 11:29
- Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Peter, 11:22
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Clemens W, 11:10
- Re: Relativistic computation, zinnic, 11:10
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 11:01
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson, 10:48
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Androcles, 10:42
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson, 10:39
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, PD, 10:28
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, surrealistic-dream, 10:27
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500, 10:26
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, newedana, 10:22
- What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glom_On., Jeff_Relf, 10:01
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Mark Fergerson, 09:57
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, PD, 09:46
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, PD, 09:44
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, PD, 09:43
- Re: help!i don't know its name., tadchem, 09:40
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 09:32
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:46
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 08:41
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 08:40
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, jem, 08:39
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 08:37
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:33
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, Bill Hobba, 08:24
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 08:15
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 08:13
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 08:04
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 08:03
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., drelliot, 08:02
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 08:01
- Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, drelliot, 08:00
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 07:59
- Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, drelliot, 07:59
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, drelliot, 07:57
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 07:36
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, donstockbauer, 07:25
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, donstockbauer, 07:24
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, donstockbauer, 07:11
- Re: Relativistic computation, Helmut Wabnig, 07:09
- Re: Hi, guys., jmfbahciv, 07:06
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 06:56
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 06:47
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje, 06:39
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5.2 Bose and Dadhich 1999, Androcles, 05:55
- Relativistic computation, Ian Macmillan, 05:47
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 28, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:42
- Re: help!i don't know its name., Brit, 05:25
- help!i don't know its name., vector, 05:07
- Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:55
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 04:41
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, glbrad01, 04:05
- Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, JimmyRigg, 03:46
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Robert Low, 03:08
- Re: Scientific error from observation, Sam Wormley, 02:59
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Dante Alighieri, 02:44
- Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Sam Wormley, 02:39
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron, 01:40
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu, 01:12
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5.2 Bose and Dadhich 1999, OsherD, 00:57
- Re: Scientific error from observation, Androcles, 00:53
- Re: Gravity Explained!, erik . lentz, 00:52
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Clemens W, 00:30
- Re: Did Nick Herbert find an error in Ray Jensen's FTL EPR Signal Device?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:13
November 27, 2005
- Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Androcles, 23:52
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Androcles, 23:47
- Re: Scientific error from observation, ?, 23:46
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Androcles, 23:41
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, ?, 23:40
- Re: photon size, ?, 23:28
- Scientific error from observation, deloid, 23:25
- Nick Herbert & Jack Sarfatti agree about the physics of Jensen's FTL idea - it doesn't work, Jack Sarfatti, 23:21
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, hhc314, 23:05
- About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Kwok Man Hui, 22:54
- Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5.2 Bose and Dadhich 1999, OsherD, 22:42
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson, 22:30
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Schoenfeld, 22:29
- Did Nick Herbert find an error in Ray Jensen's FTL EPR Signal Device?, Jack Sarfatti, 22:28
- Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Androcles, 22:27
- Re: Singularities are ALL naked, donstockbauer, 22:05
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, donstockbauer, 22:03
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Androcles, 21:54
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, FrediFizzx, 21:53
- Re: Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?, Androcles, 21:51
- Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Segin, 21:47
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Androcles, 21:45
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 21:36
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, FrediFizzx, 21:32
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 21:25
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Randy Poe, 21:18
- Re: Hi, guys., mmeron, 21:12
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:06
- Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 21:06
- Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson, 20:58
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 20:48
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:46
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500, 20:46
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 20:38
- Re: Hi, guys., hhc314, 20:34
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Double-A, 20:33
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, ?, 20:28
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 20:27
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 20:16
- Re: Desktop Railgun, hhc314, 20:15
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Richard Tobin, 20:14
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 20:11
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 20:04
- Re: Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?, R. Pierce Butler, 19:53
- Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, R. Pierce Butler, 19:47
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, hawk, 19:43
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 19:40
- Re: String theory?, T Wake, 19:29
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, T Wake, 19:28
- Re: Singularities are ALL naked, Mark Martin, 19:25
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, Bill Hobba, 19:12
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, Bill Hobba, 19:09
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 18:58
- Re: photon size, Hero . van . Jindelt, 18:57
- Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500, 18:56
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, ?, 18:52
- Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, Bill Hobba, 18:45
- String theory?, ?, 18:45
- Singularities are ALL naked, ?, 18:34
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Eric Gisse, 18:34
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 18:20
- Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, vanep, 18:10
- Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, vanep, 18:10
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Steve Ralph, 18:08
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 18:02
- Re: Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?, Sam Wormley, 17:48
- Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?, Robert, 17:32
- Faster Than Light Quantum Signal Nonlocality?, Jack Sarfatti, 17:28
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:22
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Traveler, 17:22
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, donstockbauer, 17:21
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 17:13
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Traveler, 17:11
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:10
- Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5:1 Carlip, OsherD, 16:48
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, Old Man, 16:43
- Re: Are protons really quantum black holes?, hanson, 16:42
- Re: photon size, Sam Wormley, 16:38
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 16:30
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, glbrad01, 16:25
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD, 15:57
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, relather, 15:56
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, zinnic, 15:39
- Re: photon size, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:39
- Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, Old Man, 15:34
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, glbrad01, 15:32
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 15:23
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, zinnic, 15:17
- Re: photon size, Old Man, 15:17
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 15:02
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, tadchem, 14:54
- Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:09
- Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 14:08
- Spam - Re - "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 14:07
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Traveler, 14:02
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:57
- Re: photon size, Sam Wormley, 13:57
- Re: String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, RicS, 13:31
- String Theory is a Postmodern Joke!!!!!!!! Even its textbooks say so!!!, jollyrogership, 13:29
- Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, looter, 13:27
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Eric Gisse, 13:26
- Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Al Zenner, 13:22
- Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, jollyrogership, 13:20
- Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, looter, 13:17
- Re: Desktop Railgun, CWatters, 13:16
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory -- MDT: Major Delirium Tremens, looter, 13:14
- Re: On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, jollyrogership, 13:14
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Al Zenner, 13:14
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Double-A, 12:59
- On the Advancement of Physics, The Nature of New Ideas, The Corruption of Bureaucracy, and Moving Dimensions Theory, jollyrogership, 12:58
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, jollyrogership, 12:48
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory -- MDT: Major Delirium Tremens, jollyrogership, 12:45
- Re: photon size, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 12:45
- Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Sam Wormley, 12:41
- Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, Mike, 12:27
- "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Tsom, 12:23
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:08
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 11:55
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 11:52
- photon size, Bernhard Kuemel, 11:47
- Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, Bilge, 11:46
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 11:26
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Juan R., 11:21
- Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Mark Fergerson, 11:20
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 11:18
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 11:15
- Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, Androcles, 11:14
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 11:13
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 10:59
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C., 10:56
- Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:45
- Re: String Theory and "Beauty", Juan R., 10:39
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Autymn D. C., 10:29
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Autymn D. C., 10:28
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 10:04
- Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, Mike, 09:45
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 09:21
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, glbrad01, 09:06
- Re: Why'd it take a hundred years?, Eric Gisse, 08:48
- Why'd it take a hundred years?, Don1, 08:46
- Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Jan Panteltje, 08:37
- Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje, 08:34
- Re: Sacred geometry and physics, John Christiansen, 08:32
- Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Androcles, 08:24
- Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Jimmy, 07:49
- Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Androcles, 07:21
- Re: Hi, guys., jmfbahciv, 07:14
- Sacred geometry and physics, Jimmy, 07:10
- Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, Androcles, 06:59
- Re: THE FORCE OF GRAVITYU IS AN ILLUSION, donstockbauer, 06:59
- Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 06:54
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, donstockbauer, 06:48
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 06:43
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, Androcles, 06:33
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 06:16
- THE FORCE OF GRAVITYU IS AN ILLUSION, ACE, 06:15
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5: sci.physics.research on Fundamental Nature of Energy, Androcles, 06:14
- Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Androcles, 06:11
- Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, donstockbauer, 06:00
- Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, Mike, 05:59
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory -- MDT: Major Delirium Tremens, Androcles, 05:44
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, newedana, 05:21
- Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, mmeron, 04:17
- Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5: sci.physics.research on Fundamental Nature of Energy, OsherD, 04:12
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD, 03:54
- A little reminder abot anold troll, Segin, 03:38
- Re: The Fastest Relativistic Jets: VLBA Observations of Blazars with Apparent Speeds Exceeding 25c, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:30
- Re: String Theory and "Beauty", Bob Cain, 03:22
- Re: Layman ruminations on quantum mechanics, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:58
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:56
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 02:55
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mathlete, 02:47
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory -- MDT: Major Delirium Tremens, hanson, 02:28
- Re: K&K Mechanics, nithyanand, 02:05
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 01:53
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mathlete, 01:43
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Androcles, 01:42
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, Androcles, 01:41
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, Androcles, 01:33
- Re: Conversion of Initiated Relativists Is Almost Completed, brian a m stuckless, 01:26
- Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, Androcles, 01:02
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jollyrogership, 00:41
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, jollyrogership, 00:40
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, jollyrogership, 00:40
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Al Zenner, 00:34
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 00:16
- Richard Feynman, Murray Gell-Mann in Feynman's Rainbow & Metric Elasticity of Andrei Sakharov, Jack Sarfatti, 00:04
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, FrediFizzx, 00:01
November 26, 2005
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Schoenfeld, 23:23
- Re: Hi, guys., mmeron, 23:06
- Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY, 22:17
- Re: Hi, guys., hhc314, 21:42
- Re: Hi, guys., mmeron, 21:39
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, tadchem, 21:35
- Re: Desktop Railgun, hhc314, 21:35
- Desktop Railgun, Singapura99, 21:13
- Re: How to measure H (magnetic field strength)?, jpolasek, 21:11
- Re: Hi, guys., hhc314, 21:09
- Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, Sam Wormley, 20:43
- Major problems of Modern Physics, djlockdown, 20:34
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 20:27
- Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 20:00
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 19:48
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, RL Gerl, 19:47
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 19:38
- Re: Gravity Explained!, Physitrex, 19:10
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sam Wormley, 18:59
- Re: Hi, guys., mmeron, 18:58
- Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Sam Wormley, 18:57
- Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:55
- Re: AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, Jan Panteltje, 18:24
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Neil G, 18:20
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Neil G, 18:17
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Minus XVII, 18:13
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD, 18:10
- Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, Mathlete, 18:09
- Re: Hi, guys., Dirk Van de moortel, 18:07
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 18:03
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Minus XVII, 17:56
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 17:56
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Androcles, 17:53
- Re: Article: On Atom Waves, Androcles, 17:50
- Re: Hi, guys., mmeron, 17:49
- Re: The Smart Model Theory Website, Androcles, 17:47
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 17:43
- Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", hhc314, 17:42
- Re: Hi, guys., Dirk Van de moortel, 17:41
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD, 17:39
- Re: Hi, guys., hhc314, 17:38
- Re: Gravity Explained!, Mr Clarke, 17:24
- Re: fluid dynamics question, Rene Tschaggelar, 17:04
- Re: Spacetime and matter, Mr Clarke, 16:58
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Michael Ejercito, 16:35
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, fart, 16:11
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 16:07
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, fart, 15:58
- Hi, guys., donstockbauer, 15:36
- AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES, hawk, 15:33
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 15:28
- Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism, donstockbauer, 15:12
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", don_stockbauer, 15:01
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 15:00
- Article: On Atom Waves, Robert Karl Stonjek, 14:21
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Traveler, 14:07
- Extra Space Dimensions & Casimir Force Data, Jack Sarfatti, 13:59
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Al Zenner, 13:42
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 13:37
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:35
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Juan R., 13:32
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Juan R., 13:09
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 13:03
- Re: Maxwell's demon realised, xinyongfu, 12:33
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY, 12:29
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY, 12:26
- Re: Maxwell's demon realised, xinyongfu, 12:24
- Years Of Posts Made About The Smart Model Shown...., S. Enterprize Company, 12:24
- Years Of Posts Made About The Smart Model Shown...., S. Enterprize Company, 12:24
- test to see if new topics are being accepted, donstockbauer, 12:21
- The Smart Model Theory Website, S. Enterprize Company, 12:21
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Paul Cardinale, 12:20
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY, 12:20
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Peter, 11:46
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 11:25
- Re: Question from reporter, Mark Fergerson, 10:19
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 10:13
- Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Sam Wormley, 09:55
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 25 Nov 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 09:54
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:52
- Re: The Smart Model - (Under The Guidance Of The Father ( The Creator)), Parrot Milk, 09:49
- "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Tsom, 08:42
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Steve Ralph, 08:35
- Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, CWatters, 08:16
- Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, John Griffin, 07:02
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 06:44
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 06:30
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 06:27
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", donstockbauer, 05:55
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., June R Harton, 05:44
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 05:40
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, brian a m stuckless, 05:34
- CLEAN & ELEGANT arithmetic., brian a m stuckless, 05:33
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 05:12
- Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, JimmyRigg, 03:39
- Re: Photon-particles-observed, Androcles, 02:41
- Re: Photon-particles-observed, Sam Wormley, 02:38
- Photon-particles-observed, S. Enterprize Company, 02:33
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, Androcles, 02:09
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 01:57
- Re: The Smart Model - (Under The Guidance Of The Father ( The Creator)), Sam Wormley, 01:52
- The Smart Model - (Under The Guidance Of The Father ( The Creator)), S. Enterprize Company, 01:33
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu, 01:14
- Re: How to measure H (magnetic field strength)?, Androcles, 01:13
- Re: Where am I ?, Androcles, 01:03
- Re: Where am I ?, Androcles, 00:58
- molecule to gather small groups of atoms and drop them, Sam Wormley, 00:33
- Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD, 00:01
November 25, 2005
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, em, 23:35
- Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD, 23:16
- How to measure H (magnetic field strength)?, muknot, 23:11
- Can anybody put together a hypersphere mathematically?, ?, 22:53
- Re: Particle Radii, brian a m stuckless, 22:41
- Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY, 22:17
- Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY, 22:04
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, vanep, 21:54
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", donstockbauer, 21:38
- Re: Particle Radii, brian a m stuckless, 21:30
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 21:25
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 21:23
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 20:47
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", brian a m stuckless, 20:13
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 19:48
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 19:48
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 19:43
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Bill Hobba, 18:40
- STOP there ..at the HUP-emitter, duh.!!, brian a m stuckless, 18:23
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Minus XVII, 18:18
- Re: Fusion, Old Man, 18:13
- Re: String Theory and "Beauty", Androcles, 17:58
- Re: Where am I ?, Androcles, 17:46
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, Chris, 17:31
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Old Man, 17:09
- Re: Intriguing Reading, Freedom Fighter, 16:58
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 16:54
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 16:24
- Intriguing Reading, edconrad, 16:24
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 16:16
- Re: Save your world, R. Pierce Butler, 16:15
- Re: Where am I ?, Old Man, 15:58
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 15:57
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Jan Panteltje, 15:57
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Jan Panteltje, 15:57
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:44
- Re: Where am I ?, Old Man, 15:03
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Androcles, 14:32
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 14:25
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 14:22
- Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 13:54
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 13:51
- Physics Book for AS Level, Panther, 13:36
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Greg Neill, 13:35
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Puppet_Sock, 13:33
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sam Wormley, 13:32
- Velocity vector Magnitude & Direction, v., brian a m stuckless, 13:24
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, kenseto, 13:24
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 13:14
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Michael Ejercito, 13:05
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 12:41
- Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, slehar, 12:04
- Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Sam Wormley, 11:38
- Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Eric Gisse, 11:26
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Eric Gisse, 11:22
- "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Tsom, 11:01
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, zinnic, 10:46
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Mark Martin, 10:34
- Re: Fusion, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:34
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 10:31
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:27
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Matthew Lybanon, 10:24
- Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, Darkwing, 10:10
- Re: Give up Black Holes, tadchem, 10:02
- The Fastest Relativistic Jets: VLBA Observations of Blazars with Apparent Speeds Exceeding 25c, Sam Wormley, 09:56
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bilge, 09:54
- Nanotube foams are strong and flexible, Sam Wormley, 09:51
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, tadchem, 09:42
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:28
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 09:10
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, surrealistic-dream, 09:07
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 09:04
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Sam Wormley, 08:51
- Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Sam Wormley, 08:44
- Tiny swimmer makes a splash, Sam Wormley, 08:27
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:27
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Androcles, 08:20
- Re: String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, Androcles, 08:17
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Juan R., 08:09
- String Theory is Not Even Wrong: Hollywood Is Shooting Movie Starring David Duchovney as Brian Greene: Moving Dimensions Theory Will Rescue Jessic Alba, Not Michio Kaku nor Ed Witten, jollyrogership, 08:03
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Schoenfeld, 08:01
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", drelliot, 07:49
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, drelliot, 07:41
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 07:37
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 07:36
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223), Androcles, 07:01
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Androcles, 06:59
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, David Kastrup, 05:48
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, tadchem, 05:33
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 05:20
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223), Ken S. Tucker, 04:34
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 03:45
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Eric Gisse, 03:20
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 02:52
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Sue..., 02:22
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, odin, 02:19
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, odin, 02:13
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Sue..., 02:06
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 3: The Brazilian Fermion Equations, OsherD, 01:52
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 3: The Brazilian Fermion Equations, OsherD, 01:46
- Re: Fusion, Mark Martin, 01:35
- Energy In The Knowledge Equation 3: The Brazilian Fermion Equations, OsherD, 01:33
- fluid dynamics question, metro414, 01:12
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 2: The Brazilians on Fermions, OsherD, 00:59
- Energy In The Knowledge Equation 2: The Brazilians on Fermions, OsherD, 00:48
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, operator jay, 00:19
- Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Androcles, 00:12
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Nick, 00:06
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, OsherD, 00:06
November 24, 2005
- Re: Light is being pushed!!!, Androcles, 23:58
- Re: Light is being pushed!!!, Nick, 23:53
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, OsherD, 23:52
- Covariant Volume Integration and Stokes' / Gauss' Theorem in Curved Spacetime, Jay R. Yablon, 23:48
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Nick, 23:44
- Fusion, Physitrex, 23:44
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, drelliot, 23:25
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Androcles, 23:10
- Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 22:58
- Re: Light is being pushed!!!, chris, 22:35
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 22:31
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 22:19
- Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 22:09
- Light is being pushed!!!, Nick, 22:00
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Nick, 21:56
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Nick, 21:48
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 21:45
- Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 21:40
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Nick, 21:39
- Re: Where am I ?, Sam Wormley, 21:35
- Re: Neutron Lifetime Sets Time for Atom Formation at Big Bang, Nick, 21:31
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 21:28
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Timo Nieminen, 21:26
- Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 21:24
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Nick, 21:23
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, operator jay, 21:07
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, David Kastrup, 20:26
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Cephalobus_alienus, 20:09
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:01
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Jerry, 20:00
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Sam Wormley, 19:56
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 19:27
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 19:18
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Josef Matz, 19:15
- Re: Where am I ?, Androcles, 18:28
- Re: Where am I ?, Androcles, 18:17
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Henry Haapalainen, 18:07
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, simplesong1004, 18:03
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 17:50
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, newedana, 17:49
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 17:31
- Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Old Man, 16:54
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 16:52
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:47
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Jerry, 16:46
- Re: Where am I ?, Old Man, 16:01
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 15:45
- Re: Where am I ?, Old Man, 15:15
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Mark Martin, 14:56
- Re: Where am I ?, Old Man, 14:55
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sue..., 14:46
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Mark Martin, 14:41
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, surrealistic-dream, 14:34
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, surrealistic-dream, 14:28
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Timo Nieminen, 14:25
- Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker, 14:11
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 14:06
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:57
- Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:44
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Steve Ralph, 13:27
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, tadchem, 12:55
- Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Michael Ejercito, 12:18
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:17
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 11:32
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., rangermccoy, 11:26
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 11:26
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 11:16
- Re: The magnetic radius of the electron, brian a m stuckless, 11:13
- Mysterious Magnetic LENGTH lo, brian a m stuckless, 11:13
- "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Tleb, 11:02
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 11:00
- Re: Infinity a Concept, William Hughes, 10:54
- Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dr Photon, 10:42
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, hanson, 10:39
- FORCE OF GRAVITY IS AN IILLUSION, ACE, 10:37
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 10:29
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:28
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:19
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:15
- Re: Where am I ?, hanson, 10:14
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, hanson, 09:59
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Schoenfeld, 09:54
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 09:50
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Schoenfeld, 09:45
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, romirad2, 09:40
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:34
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:17
- Re: Zone Plate or Pin Sieves shaped for anamorphic image compression, Mark Fergerson, 09:15
- Re: Infinity a Concept, David Kastrup, 09:09
- Re: Question from reporter, Mark Fergerson, 08:57
- Re: DARK ENERGY AND THE PREPOSTEROUS UNIVERSE, Peter, 08:54
- Re: Physicists have observed a feature known as a "pseudogap", Mike Speed, 08:52
- Re: Where am I ?, Sam Wormley, 08:49
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Robert Low, 08:48
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley, 08:39
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Dante Alighieri, 08:32
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Dante Alighieri, 08:27
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Josef Matz, 08:25
- Re: Theoretical help, Mark Fergerson, 08:24
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Juan R., 08:09
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 08:02
- Re: Light slower than CG?, Mark Fergerson, 07:45
- Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, mickg, 07:41
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 07:29
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Schoenfeld, 06:54
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Y.Porat, 06:22
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Y.Porat, 06:20
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Y.Porat, 06:14
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 06:03
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 05:32
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, John Christiansen, 04:33
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 04:07
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., June R Harton, 03:38
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:24
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, snapdragon31, 03:17
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:05
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 02:56
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 02:51
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 02:44
- Re: Light slower than CG?, Brit, 02:33
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:31
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bob Cain, 02:29
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, franklinhu, 01:55
- Re: A question about lens, joshipura, 01:45
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mathlete, 01:42
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 01:31
- Light slower than CG?, ReGenesis0, 01:19
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Jerry, 01:03
- Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001, 00:51
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Peter, 00:22
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 00:19
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 00:16
November 23, 2005
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Androcles, 23:47
- Re: Where am I ?, hanson, 23:47
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, hanson, 23:32
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sue..., 23:25
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 23:25
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 23:12
- String Theory and "Beauty", mike3, 23:05
- Re: Physicists have observed a feature known as a "pseudogap", tj Frazir, 23:05
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 23:02
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Al Zenner, 23:00
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 22:55
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bill Hobba, 22:48
- Physicists have observed a feature known as a "pseudogap", Sam Wormley, 22:44
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, snapdragon31, 22:31
- Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY, 22:31
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 22:26
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 22:20
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 22:18
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 22:14
- Re: TURKEY IN THE (ST)RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, HenryBumstead, 22:10
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY, 22:05
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley, 21:58
- Re: Spring pendulum, truth . . teller, 21:53
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, brian a m stuckless, 21:51
- Re: You just can't study nothing !, LEFTY, 21:48
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, brian a m stuckless, 21:30
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, brian a m stuckless, 21:15
- Re: Simple Classical Mechanics Problem, Old Man, 21:04
- Re: Where am I ?, Old Man, 20:55
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen, 20:48
- Re: All gravitational lenses possess the physic of lensing, Mark Martin, 20:43
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Old Man, 20:30
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 20:27
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 20:19
- Re: Superposition Information Highway, Gregory L. Hansen, 20:17
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, mmeron, 20:13
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Old Man, 20:12
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Henry Haapalainen, 20:12
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Bill Hobba, 20:07
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 20:01
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Bill Hobba, 19:59
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:56
- All gravitational lenses possess the physic of lensing, glbrad01, 19:49
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 19:39
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 19:35
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 19:30
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, FrediFizzx, 19:21
- Superposition Information Highway, gary, 19:11
- Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, mmeron, 18:11
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, mmeron, 18:05
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Tom Roberts, 18:00
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley, 17:50
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sue..., 17:28
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:22
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, rds, 17:18
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley, 17:02
- Maxwell equations and plane waves, Timo Nieminen, 17:01
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 16:46
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Bob Cain, 16:36
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Bob Cain, 16:32
- DARK ENERGY AND THE PREPOSTEROUS UNIVERSE, Sam Wormley, 16:26
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 16:24
- Re: TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, *The Commentator*, 15:50
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223), Ken S. Tucker, 15:41
- Electromagnetic Equation in to Numerical Form, Magnetics, 15:38
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Nick, 15:24
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley, 15:14
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 14:50
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley, 14:18
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, PD, 14:17
- Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Gregory L. Hansen, 14:13
- Re: eprint citations with bibtex, Timo Nieminen, 14:10
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, TomGee, 13:55
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Sam Wormley, 13:48
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley, 13:40
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 13:31
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, rds, 13:00
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley, 12:42
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Sam Wormley, 12:40
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, rds, 12:36
- What is Lens MTF Test and use it like an film emulsion, mustafa umut sarac, 12:32
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, TomGee, 12:04
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Puppet_Sock, 11:58
- Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, PD, 11:58
- Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Jonathan Hoyle, 11:53
- Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley, 11:49
- Mass and Energy Relationship, rds, 11:42
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Richard Henry, 11:39
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 755 November 23, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 11:24
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", tj Frazir, 11:22
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", tj Frazir, 11:21
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, PD, 11:13
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 11:07
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 10:57
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, PD, 10:50
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 10:43
- TURKEY IN THE RAW -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design -- Coal-Age Bones, edconrad, 10:42
- Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., jollyrogership, 10:32
- Re: "The Paradox of Zeno", Sam Wormley, 10:17
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, PD, 10:15
- Re: Where am I ?, wgilmour, 10:09
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 10:02
- Re: Where am I ?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 09:59
- Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 09:55
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Sam Wormley, 09:54
- "The Paradox of Zeno", Tleb, 09:54
- Re: Where am I ?, tadchem, 09:47
- Re: Spacetime and matter, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 09:45
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, tadchem, 09:36
- Re: Spacetime and matter, Sam Wormley, 09:25
- Re: Where am I ?, Sam Wormley, 09:22
- Re: eprint citations with bibtex, Bruce Scott TOK, 09:22
- Re: _Physicalism_, Dogma Discharge, 09:19
- Re: Where am I ?, PD, 09:10
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 08:49
- Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 08:41
- Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), jmfbahciv, 08:36
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 08:33
- Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick, 08:29
- Re: from the poles to the equator, Dik T. Winter, 08:23
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 08:14
- Re: Where am I ?, donstockbauer, 07:25
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, donstockbauer, 07:20
- Re: Gravity is a glomming on, a type of consumption., donstockbauer, 07:16
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance (bayes versus frequentists), Googlety Glop, 07:15
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), donstockbauer, 07:06
- Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!, donstockbauer, 07:03
- Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, donstockbauer, 06:59
- Re: $ All sub-SYSTEMs have "surroundings", duh. Sub-SYSTEMs are "submerged" in SYSTEM "working fluid" AMBiENT. Sub-SYSTEMs ONLY EXCHANGE energy with "working fluid" AMBiENT. Go-go Google GROUP SEARCH: < My BiGGER bang > ..My REAL STUFF. TOTAL LaGrangian h*f Dis-iNFORMATiON follows with Tom Roberts.!!, donstockbauer, 06:56
- Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, brian a m stuckless, 06:34
- $ All sub-SYSTEMs have "surroundings", duh. Sub-SYSTEMs are "submerged" in SYSTEM "working fluid" AMBiENT. Sub-SYSTEMs ONLY EXCHANGE energy with "working fluid" AMBiENT. Go-go Google GROUP SEARCH: < My BiGGER bang > ..My REAL STUFF. TOTAL LaGrangian h*f Dis-iNFORMATiON follows with Tom Roberts.!!, brian a m stuckless, 06:34
- Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!, Androcles, 06:32
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 06:28
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 06:03
- Gravity is a glomming on, a type of consumption., Jeff_Relf, 05:45
- Where am I ?, Physitrex, 05:41
- Spacetime and matter, Physitrex, 04:32
- Re: Question from reporter, Don't ever approach me, 04:20
- Re: You just can't study nothing !, Don't ever approach me, 04:15
- Re: You just can't study nothing !, Nick, 03:58
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Nick, 03:50
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Nick, 03:45
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Nick, 03:39
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 03:30
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Bill Hobba, 03:23
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat, 03:03
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat, 02:57
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat, 02:44
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu, 02:12
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, OsherD, 02:09
- Re: You just can't study nothing !, OsherD, 01:46
- Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!, Philip Deitiker, 01:39
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu, 01:29
- _Physicalism_, Jeff_Relf, 01:24
- Re: You just can't study nothing !, LEFTY, 01:18
- Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, OsherD, 01:17
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 01:17
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Peter, 01:16
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Autymn D. C., 01:07
- Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 01:04
- Re: Theory of the day, Physitrex, 00:54
- Re: You just can't study nothing !, OsherD, 00:45
- Re: REAL ALCHEMY For BIOLOGY, Richard Schultz, 00:42
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, brian a m stuckless, 00:42
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD, 00:35
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 00:09
November 22, 2005
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley, 23:58
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 23:53
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:53
- Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer, 23:31
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Sam Wormley, 23:00
- Re: Simple Classical Mechanics Problem, mmeron, 22:58
- Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical., LEFTY, 22:53
- Energy In The Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 22:41
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 22:32
- Re: Measure the state of quantum bits in a quantum computer without disturbing the state, Bob Cain, 21:50
- Re: REAL ALCHEMY For BIOLOGY, Farooq W, 21:42
- Re: eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum, Tice with a J, 21:35
- Re: eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum, rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx, 21:26
- Re: Simple Classical Mechanics Problem, Tice with a J, 21:23
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Sam Wormley, 21:02
- Simple Classical Mechanics Problem, btevans, 21:02
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 20:30
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 20:22
- Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Sam Wormley, 19:48
- Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete, 19:21
- Re: OT: Are protons really quantum black holes?, donstockbauer, 19:04
- Re: Gravity Explained!, Pelastration, 18:36
- Re: Gravity Explained!, Pelastration, 18:30
- Re: Gravity Explained!, wgilmour, 18:11
- Re: eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum, Greg Neill, 18:10
- Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Androcles, 18:04
- Re: REAL ALCHEMY For BIOLOGY, onehappymadman, 17:30
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Androcles, 17:22
- Gravity Explained!, junoexpress, 17:20
- REAL ALCHEMY For BIOLOGY, rem460, 17:18
- Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Timo Nieminen, 16:57
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley, 16:56
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 16:54
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx, 16:45
- Re: from the poles to the equator, Clemens W, 16:44
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 16:37
- Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy, 16:32
- eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum, rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx, 16:06
- Re: Theory of the day, Old Man, 15:56
- Re: The anti graviti properties of spaghetti, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:55
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, richard miller, 15:43
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, PD, 15:33
- Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Old Man, 15:24
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 15:00
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, PD, 14:58
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 14:48
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, PD, 14:42
- Re: help - how do i calculate this?, R. Pierce Butler, 14:36
- Re: help - how do i calculate this?, R. Pierce Butler, 14:34
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 14:25
- Re: Multiple gamma peaks for same radionuclide, Old Man, 14:23
- Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), PD, 14:23
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 14:06
- Re: Theory of the day, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 13:55
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 13:50
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, tadchem, 13:32
- Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:57
- Re: Theoretical help, PD, 12:53
- NATURE doesn't care we have coherent GUESS iSS STANDARDs., brian a m stuckless, 12:49
- Re: Theoretical help, Puppet_Sock, 12:44
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Harry, 12:39
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Externet, 12:23
- Re: Question from reporter, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:17
- Re: Theoretical help, PD, 12:17
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:05
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 12:02
- Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:56
- Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:54
- Re: Search engines - Help me! The internet is full of crap!, bae, 11:53
- Measure the state of quantum bits in a quantum computer without disturbing the state, Sam Wormley, 11:48
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat, 11:47
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 11:00
- Re: Theory of the day, Puppet_Sock, 10:51
- Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick, 10:49
- Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick, 10:46
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 10:46
- Re: Spring pendulum, John Bailey, 10:44
- Re: Theoretical help, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:43
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Terrence, 10:20
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, David R Tribble, 10:10
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Gregory L. Hansen, 10:07
- Accuracy vs. Relevance, I.Vecchi, 10:04
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, PD, 10:03
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Sam Wormley, 10:00
- Re: Question from reporter, PD, 09:55
- Re: from the poles to the equator, Don1, 09:43
- Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 09:41
- Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 09:37
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 09:33
- Re: Question from reporter, Once again, 09:16
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 09:15
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, LEFTY, 09:10
- A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Tleb, 09:06
- Re: Mpegs for presentation, Androcles, 09:05
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, tadchem, 09:02
- You just can't study nothing !, Once again, 09:01
- Hella sketch., Jeff_Relf, 09:01
- Re: Grainy space for Lorentz-transformations, pekka . virtanen, 08:59
- Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick, 08:58
- Re: Maxwell stress tensor, Andy Resnick, 08:43
- Re: Mpegs for presentation, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 08:17
- Re: from the poles to the equator, Clemens W, 08:05
- Re: Question from reporter, jmfbahciv, 08:03
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 08:02
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Igor, 07:56
- Re: Question from reporter, Igor, 07:38
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, tadchem, 07:37
- Sue to try GUESS equations., brian a m stuckless, 07:10
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 07:10
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Henry Haapalainen, 07:00
- Re: voltage vs current, krishna, 06:46
- Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical., donstockbauer, 06:24
- Order_Randomness is notional, not physical., Jeff_Relf, 06:04
- Call for paper in Nanotechnology journal, Nano, 05:40
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, tdp1001, 05:34
- Re: help - how do i calculate this?, CWatters, 05:21
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, glbrad01, 04:48
- Multiple gamma peaks for same radionuclide, Hannes Nagel, 04:34
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 04:33
- Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Helmut Wabnig, 04:28
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Bob Cain, 04:16
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., suznet, 04:14
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:12
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:06
- Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Androcles, 04:05
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, Bob Cain, 04:04
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 04:04
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:02
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 03:44
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Androcles, 03:41
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Autymn D. C., 03:37
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 03:27
- help - how do i calculate this?, R. Pierce Butler, 03:06
- Re: from the poles to the equator, Eric Gisse, 02:46
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:30
- Theoretical help, natjbrown, 02:18
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mountain man, 01:47
- Re: Spring pendulum, Bob Cain, 00:33
- Re: from the poles to the equator, Doug, 00:21
- Re: Two-Billion-Year-Old Surprise Found Beneath The Azores, cnctut, 00:18
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 00:11
November 21, 2005
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 23:57
- Re: from the poles to the equator, Sam Wormley, 23:51
- Re: Question from reporter, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:31
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 23:30
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, LEFTY, 23:15
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 23:06
- Re: Theory of the day, Physitrex, 23:05
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, hanson, 23:02
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 22:59
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 22:57
- Re: Question from reporter, donstockbauer, 22:41
- Re: Question from reporter, cnctut, 22:37
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, donstockbauer, 22:17
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD, 22:08
- Re: Article: Staff 'crisis' threatens physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:53
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD, 21:51
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD, 21:37
- Re: Question from reporter, Aetherist, 21:34
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 21:28
- Re: Question from reporter, Timo Nieminen, 21:05
- from the poles to the equator, Don1, 20:36
- Re: Article: Staff 'crisis' threatens physics, Androcles, 20:31
- Re: Theory of the day, Old Man, 20:19
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 20:17
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Old Man, 19:51
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:47
- Re: Theory of the day, donstockbauer, 19:40
- Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD, 19:32
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, gerard46, 19:31
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, ytyourclothes, 19:26
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Old Man, 19:14
- Re: Question from reporter, Androcles, 19:11
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Tom Roberts, 18:50
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Gregory L. Hansen, 18:47
- Re: Question from reporter, Gregory L. Hansen, 18:42
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 18:37
- Re: Spring pendulum, Gregory L. Hansen, 18:25
- Re: Theory of the day, Puppet_Sock, 18:21
- Re: Theory of the day, Physitrex, 17:35
- Re: Lights On - Nobody Home; Response To Sam, CWatters, 17:32
- Re: voltage vs current, CWatters, 17:29
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD, 17:17
- Re: Question from reporter, Timo Nieminen, 17:07
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 17:06
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Old Man, 17:02
- Re: Question from reporter, Timo Nieminen, 16:59
- Theory of the day, Physitrex, 16:53
- Re: Mpegs for presentation, Mark Jones, 16:51
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Physitrex, 16:51
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Clemens W, 16:43
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, FrediFizzx, 16:35
- Re: Question from reporter, dru . sefton, 16:25
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 16:22
- Re: Question from reporter, dru . sefton, 16:07
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 15:53
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD, 15:53
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Old Man, 15:40
- Lights On - Nobody Home; Response To Sam, Mitch Perkins, 15:36
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:24
- Re: Question from reporter, PD, 15:18
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:17
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:06
- Article: Staff 'crisis' threatens physics, Robert Karl Stonjek, 15:04
- Re: "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", donstockbauer, 14:42
- Re: Question from reporter, tadchem, 14:41
- Re: Question from reporter, Timo Nieminen, 14:37
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:35
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Paul Cardinale, 14:30
- Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:29
- Re: eprint citations with bibtex, Timo Nieminen, 14:24
- Question from reporter, dru . sefton, 14:19
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 13:58
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Steve Ralph, 13:32
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 13:32
- Re: voltage vs current, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:27
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", tadchem, 13:10
- Re: Grainy space for Lorentz-transformations, tadchem, 13:08
- Re: Where are the constants?, The TimeLord, 13:06
- Re: voltage vs current, John Popelish, 13:04
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Mark Martin, 13:03
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 13:01
- Re: Where are the constants?, The TimeLord, 13:00
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Double-A, 12:44
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, The TimeLord, 12:37
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Traveler, 12:17
- Re: Spring pendulum, Harry, 12:07
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Eric Gisse, 12:05
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Traveler, 12:03
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 12:01
- Re: Help with Navier Stokes, Puppet_Sock, 11:42
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., surrealistic-dream, 11:41
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat, 11:39
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat, 11:33
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD, 11:32
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 11:31
- Help with Navier Stokes, C_B_Trail, 11:13
- Grainy space for Lorentz-transformations, pekka . virtanen, 11:05
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 10:58
- Re: EXHiBiT VELOCiTY & SPEED of light ..for DiFFERENT particle COUNTs.!! EXHiBiT ERROR-BARs for ALL "in-vacu" PARTiCLE-COUNTs, Cracked-pot.!! Many DiFFERENT particle-COUNTs *NOT* different SiTUATiONs, Dimwit.!!, Mark Martin, 10:55
- Re: EXHiBiT VELOCiTY & SPEED of light ..for DiFFERENT particle COUNTs.!! EXHiBiT ERROR-BARs for ALL "in-vacu" PARTiCLE-COUNTs, Cracked-pot.!! Many DiFFERENT particle-COUNTs *NOT* different SiTUATiONs, Dimwit.!!, brian a m stuckless, 10:50
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, BruceS, 10:49
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Traveler, 10:48
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, brian a m stuckless, 10:46
- Re: "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", Sam Wormley, 10:44
- THE PHOTON, ACE, 10:38
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Sam Wormley, 10:34
- "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", Tleb, 10:33
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, The TimeLord, 10:32
- Re: Spring pendulum, curtvon, 10:29
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 4: Universe Acceleration = Internal Pointer + External Pull, OsherD, 10:26
- eprint citations with bibtex, John F, 10:19
- Re: voltage vs current, Doug, 10:14
- Universe Does Have An "Outside" 4: Universe Acceleration = Internal Pointer + External Pull, OsherD, 10:13
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Sam Wormley, 10:04
- Re: voltage vs current, Androcles, 09:58
- Zone Plate or Pin Sieves shaped for anamorphic image compression, mustafa umut sarac, 09:52
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, hanson, 09:50
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:28
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:16
- Re: Spring pendulum, Androcles, 08:57
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Traveler, 08:53
- voltage vs current, krishna, 08:43
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 08:38
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 08:35
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Dr Photon, 08:22
- Re: Bladeless Magnetic MHD Turbine, Rene Tschaggelar, 08:10
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Dr Photon, 08:09
- SINGULAR DYNAMICS OF ONE-D-DOUBLE-U, dedanoe, 07:32
- Re: EXHiBiT VELOCiTY & SPEED of light ..for DiFFERENT particle COUNTs.!! EXHiBiT ERROR-BARs for ALL "in-vacu" PARTiCLE-COUNTs, Cracked-pot.!! Many DiFFERENT particle-COUNTs *NOT* different SiTUATiONs, Dimwit.!!, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 07:27
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Traveler, 07:26
- Re: Spring pendulum, Harry, 07:20
- Re: Spring pendulum, curtvon, 07:08
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", glbrad01, 06:49
- Re: New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 21, 2005, donstockbauer, 06:25
- Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, donstockbauer, 06:14
- Frame dragging experiments ???, Robert Finch, 05:50
- Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje, 05:48
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 21, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:40
- Re: Triggers Circuits, Adam Norton, 05:17
- Re: Neutron Lifetime Sets Time for Atom Formation at Big Bang, Jeffrey, 05:11
- Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, Maarten van Reeuwijk, 04:39
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 04:39
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 04:26
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, CWatters, 04:19
- Re: Magnetic Poles, CWatters, 04:08
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 04:04
- Re: Lights On - Nobody Home; Response to Sam, CWatters, 03:50
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", George, 02:42
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Orion, 02:36
- Re: A little challenge for relativists., brian a m stuckless, 02:28
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's, brian a m stuckless, 02:28
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Orion, 02:22
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Bill Hobba, 02:03
- Mpegs for presentation, Homer500, 02:00
- Re: Batteries/electricity Safety Question, Doug, 01:53
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, franklinhu, 01:51
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu, 01:42
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Nick, 01:35
- EXHiBiT VELOCiTY & SPEED of light ..for DiFFERENT particle COUNTs.!! EXHiBiT ERROR-BARs for ALL "in-vacu" PARTiCLE-COUNTs, Cracked-pot.!! Many DiFFERENT particle-COUNTs *NOT* different SiTUATiONs, Dimwit.!!, brian a m stuckless, 01:13
- Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity, Translation, brian a m stuckless, 01:13
- Ampere's law with a long solenoid....., Harry, 01:05
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu, 00:27
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu, 00:22
November 20, 2005
- Re: Magnetic Poles, Charles, 23:51
- Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., Autymn D. C., 23:41
- Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Androcles, 23:35
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, mmeron, 23:14
- Batteries/electricity Safety Question, TribalLot, 23:03
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 22:57
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 22:56
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, LEFTY, 22:52
- Re: Magnetic Poles, Sam Wormley, 22:17
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tdp1001, 22:16
- Re: Magnetic Poles, RP, 22:13
- Re: Magnetic Poles, Graffman, 22:07
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's, Androcles, 22:06
- Re: Spring pendulum, Androcles, 22:00
- Lights On - Nobody Home; Response to Sam, platopes, 21:58
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Androcles, 21:50
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Traveler, 21:49
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Androcles, 21:46
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:44
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:40
- Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, juggz, 21:37
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 21:22
- Re: Magnetic Poles, Sam Wormley, 20:36
- Re: Magnetic Poles, FrediFizzx, 20:10
- Magnetic Poles, Graffman, 19:57
- Lights On - Nobody Home, platopes, 19:45
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:41
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, LEFTY, 19:22
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Nick, 19:19
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Nick, 19:14
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 19:10
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 19:01
- Re: Spring pendulum, curtvon, 18:47
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 3: Pointers to Dimensions/Variables, OsherD, 18:36
- Universe Does Have An "Outside" 3: Pointers to Dimensions/Variables, OsherD, 18:24
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", T Wake, 18:13
- Molecular "cage" hoists atomic cargo, antimatter100, 18:00
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Nick, 17:49
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Starbles, 17:36
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, OsherD, 17:27
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's, Johnny Depp, 17:01
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 16:44
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Old Man, 16:01
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Lynx Xiong, 15:20
- Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", tadchem, 15:01
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 14:58
- Re: Spring pendulum, Androcles, 14:58
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Old Man, 14:48
- Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 14:40
- Re: The proof of mass vector., PD, 14:30
- Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", Sam Wormley, 14:16
- Spookfeed's movie., Androcles, 14:16
- Re: Spring pendulum, Sam Wormley, 14:15
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Androcles, 14:14
- Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", Sam Wormley, 14:12
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, dirk . laureyssens, 14:09
- Re: Watch pendulum with magnetic push pull kick, tadchem, 14:02
- Re: Spring pendulum, curtvon, 13:53
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 13:51
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Old Man, 13:46
- Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., Happy Hippy, 13:42
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, OsherD, 13:38
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 13:34
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, OsherD, 13:26
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 13:24
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Ross A. Finlayson, 13:18
- Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, OsherD, 13:10
- Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", donstockbauer, 13:08
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, hanson, 13:05
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Full Name, 12:59
- Watch pendulum with magnetic push pull kick, mustafa umut sarac, 12:54
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, hanson, 12:52
- Bladeless Magnetic MHD Turbine, mustafa umut sarac, 12:51
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD, 12:31
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, hanson, 12:23
- Spring pendulum, curtvon, 12:22
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, hanson, 12:13
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, jbacsa2, 12:06
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Traveler, 11:59
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, brian a m stuckless, 11:59
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 11:53
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Ross A. Finlayson, 11:49
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Lin Xiong, 11:48
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, hanson, 11:37
- "Retic Postings and SPAM", Yad, 11:35
- "Retic Postings and SPAM", Yad, 11:35
- Re: Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, CWatters, 11:35
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Traveler, 11:31
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:22
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:21
- Why doesn't the standard kilogram vary?, Don1, 11:20
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 11:11
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Ben Rudiak-Gould, 10:59
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, LEFTY, 10:35
- Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., pete, 10:32
- Re: Introductory Physics Texts for Self Study, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:22
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:19
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, Juan R., 10:14
- Re: Quantizing space breaks up waves, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:04
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:03
- Re: Things consume, glom on, gravitate, in the sort term., LEFTY, 09:40
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:36
- Re: Introductory Physics Texts for Self Study, jmfbahciv, 09:26
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Traveler, 09:17
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY, 09:11
- Introductory Physics Texts for Self Study, David M. Li, 09:08
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, donstockbauer, 09:02
- AS above SO below., brian a m stuckless, 08:55
- Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., brian a m stuckless, 08:55
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", john_ramsden, 08:45
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Sam Wormley, 08:15
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Androcles, 08:07
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Androcles, 07:24
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Robert J. Kolker, 07:21
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, oriel36, 07:07
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Androcles, 06:59
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tdp1001, 06:54
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Androcles, 06:51
- Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., jmfbahciv, 06:45
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Androcles, 06:41
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 05:48
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:16
- Re: YFE's, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:58
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:52
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:51
- Re: YFE's, Ken S. Tucker, 04:46
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 04:30
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:25
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:23
- Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD, 04:18
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:16
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:56
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, FrediFizzx, 03:52
- Things consume, glom on, gravitate, in the sort term., Jeff_Relf, 03:48
- Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD, 03:44
- Re: If Einstein And Minkowski Had Known About Cubic Complex Variables?, Igor, 03:36
- Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., Bob Cain, 03:00
- SI GiORGi (MKSA) units are meter, kilogram, second and Ampere, duh.!! SI GUESS iSS units are meter, kilogram, second, Ampere, Kelvin & Mol. There are NO arbitrary fundamental physical constants of NATURE, now. The cgs ..or MKS units are no longer considered complete or coherent., brian a m stuckless, 02:45
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, brian a m stuckless, 02:45
- Re: Triggers Circuits, jimp, 02:05
- Re: Triggers Circuits, Louis Boyd, 01:50
- Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 01:46
- Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 01:35
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu, 01:32
- Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, John Decker, 01:08
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu, 00:58
- Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, Doug, 00:46
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, donstockbauer, 00:25
- Triggers Circuits, sygnus, 00:24
- Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., John Decker, 00:22
- Re: Einstein WAS smart, donstockbauer, 00:14
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, hanson, 00:01
November 19, 2005
- Gravity & Magnetic impulse vs inertia., brian a m stuckless, 23:43
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, brian a m stuckless, 23:43
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Old Man, 23:37
- Butterfly Wings Share Light Tricks with TV, Sam Wormley, 23:26
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Old Man, 22:56
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 22:48
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 22:46
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, brian a m stuckless, 22:44
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, brian a m stuckless, 22:17
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Old Man, 22:17
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Sam Wormley, 22:14
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 22:10
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 22:01
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Androcles, 21:56
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 21:54
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Androcles, 21:54
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Mathlete, 21:51
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 21:49
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, hanson, 21:49
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Androcles, 21:44
- Re: It's a pity ain't it - Response to Bob Cain, Androcles, 21:32
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Androcles, 21:15
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Old Man, 21:15
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Sam Wormley, 20:51
- Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., brian a m stuckless, 20:26
- Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., brian a m stuckless, 20:26
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Mark Martin, 20:24
- Re: Frazirs foggy bottom, T Wake, 19:56
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 19:55
- Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Uno Lapideus, 19:51
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Old Man, 19:45
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:37
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:33
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:21
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Androcles, 19:20
- Re: It's a pity ain't it - Response to Bob Cain, Gary Sokolich, 19:18
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:14
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 19:02
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 19:02
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, hanson, 19:02
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, Chuck Szmanda, 18:33
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, mmeron, 18:24
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Old Man, 18:05
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., vanep, 17:56
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 17:54
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 17:43
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, FrediFizzx, 17:39
- A photon's Possible_Histories are physical, not notional., Jeff_Relf, 17:29
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Old Man, 16:58
- Thomson, How can you be so sure a photon has a finite complexity ?, Jeff_Relf, 16:54
- Re: Silly question viz. double-slit experiment, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 16:40
- YFE's, Ken S. Tucker, 16:35
- Re: Silly question viz. double-slit experiment, Old Man, 16:33
- Maxwell stress tensor, Tobin Fricke, 16:33
- Re: Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A New Relativistic Notion, Mathlete, 16:13
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Old Man, 15:44
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Androcles, 15:41
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Androcles, 15:26
- Re: If Einstein And Minkowski Had Known About Cubic Complex Variables?, donstockbauer, 15:19
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 15:17
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, donstockbauer, 15:10
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, T Wake, 15:05
- Re: Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A New Relativistic Notion, jambaugh, 15:00
- Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, Stan Byers, 14:21
- Re: Why Derivatives Usually Occur One Per Term in Physical Equations, OsherD, 13:30
- Why Derivatives Usually Occur One Per Term in Physical Equations, OsherD, 13:20
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: Where are the constants?, Don1, 12:51
- Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, Mark Martin, 12:39
- English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, Stan Byers, 12:26
- If Einstein And Minkowski Had Known About Cubic Complex Variables?, Mathlete, 12:26
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jambaugh, 12:07
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Traveler, 12:01
- Re: Both a photon and the unverse are infinitely complex., Androcles, 11:54
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Traveler, 11:37
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 11:32
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 11:23
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, LEFTY, 11:17
- Re: Where are the constants?, Eric Gisse, 11:13
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 11:11
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 10:44
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 10:34
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:32
- Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, donstockbauer, 10:27
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Robert J. Kolker, 10:22
- Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, andy everett, 10:21
- Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, donstockbauer, 10:15
- Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, andy everett, 10:11
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, donstockbauer, 10:10
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 10:09
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Tom Roberts, 10:07
- Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, Androcles, 10:07
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:05
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 10:03
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 09:55
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:55
- Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Sam Wormley, 09:54
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:51
- Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje, 09:51
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 09:50
- "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Woleb, 09:50
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:48
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 09:48
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:45
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Androcles, 09:42
- Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje, 09:42
- Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje, 09:38
- Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Sam Wormley, 09:38
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:33
- Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje, 09:28
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Traveler, 09:24
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Androcles, 09:04
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Juan R., 09:02
- Re: Both a photon and the unverse are infinitely complex., David Thomson, 09:00
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 08:52
- Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, Androcles, 08:45
- Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, Androcles, 08:41
- Re: Where are the constants?, Don1, 08:37
- Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Sam Wormley, 08:35
- Problems to Sharpen the Young, Sam Wormley, 08:27
- Cassini gets the skinny on Saturn's rings, Sam Wormley, 08:25
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, relather, 08:23
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Androcles, 08:14
- Re: Where are the constants?, PD, 07:58
- Re: Silly question viz. double-slit experiment, PD, 07:47
- Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, PD, 07:44
- Re: How do stars form?, Orion, 07:43
- Both a photon and the unverse are infinitely complex., Jeff_Relf, 07:24
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 07:18
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 07:15
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 07:12
- Photons don't make round trips., Jeff_Relf, 07:07
- Re: Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Bill Hobba, 07:06
- Relativity and the Planck Quantities : What's Absolute and What's Relative?, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 06:51
- Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., Sue..., 06:50
- Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, mwmiller314, 06:34
- Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., Autymn D. C., 06:33
- Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, mwmiller314, 06:29
- Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, andy everett, 06:27
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 06:26
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 06:24
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 05:58
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, donstockbauer, 05:33
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx, 04:51
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, relather, 04:50
- Silly question viz. double-slit experiment, wfaxon@xxxxxxx, 03:18
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, lone . nomad, 03:01
- Re: An Infinite-Energy or Infinite-Force Black Hole, OsherD, 02:57
- Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, wfaxon@xxxxxxx, 02:55
- Re: An Infinite-Energy or Infinite-Force Black Hole, OsherD, 02:42
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 02:41
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 02:35
- Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, wfaxon@xxxxxxx, 02:33
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, franklinhu, 02:28
- An Infinite-Energy or Infinite-Force Black Hole, OsherD, 02:19
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 02:19
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, a_plutonium, 02:09
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 01:50
- Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD, 01:43
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 01:40
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 01:27
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 01:26
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, hanson, 01:26
- Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD, 01:01
- Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD, 00:46
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 00:37
- Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD, 00:36
- Re: Adics the native numbers of Riemann geometry; Eucl = Riem append Loba, mmeron, 00:30
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, relather, 00:23
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 00:04
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
November 18, 2005
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 23:34
- Re: Adics the native numbers of Riemann geometry; Eucl = Riem append Loba, Timo Nieminen, 23:18
- Re: Dr. Unruh: www.Theory.Physics.UBC.CA, C.J. Luke, 23:15
- Re: Eotvos., em, 22:59
- Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD, 22:49
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 22:45
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Androcles, 22:37
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 22:32
- Re: Where are the constants?, Don1, 22:09
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, donstockbauer, 22:02
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 21:57
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Androcles, 21:24
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Androcles, 21:21
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, relather, 21:21
- Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A New Relativistic Notion, Mathlete, 20:50
- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 18 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 19:09
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 19:06
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 18:53
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, hanson, 18:46
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 18:40
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 18:38
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Androcles, 18:34
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 18:13
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Androcles, 17:31
- Re: my two new pages, Androcles, 17:14
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Old Man, 16:45
- Re: my two new pages, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:28
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 Nov 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 16:19
- my two new pages, dedanoe, 16:10
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 15:09
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 15:01
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, tadchem, 14:46
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Androcles, 14:39
- Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., donstockbauer, 14:27
- Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., donstockbauer, 14:25
- Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods 2: Large Exponents, OsherD, 14:24
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Robert J. Kolker, 14:23
- Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., donstockbauer, 14:22
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, donstockbauer, 14:19
- Re: Where are the constants?, PD, 13:27
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad, brian a m stuckless, 12:43
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Mark Martin, 12:35
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Carlos L, 12:28
- Re: The anti graviti properties of spaghetti, Sam Wormley, 12:16
- Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon", Sam Wormley, 12:13
- Re: Dr. Unruh: www.Theory.Physics.UBC.CA, Thomas Wootten, 12:09
- "A Snapshot of a Photon", Woleb, 11:52
- Re: The anti graviti properties of spaghetti, Randy Poe, 11:49
- Re: The proof of mass vector., PD, 11:49
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Traveler, 11:41
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Black Knight, 11:14
- Re: A question about lens, PD, 11:11
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, a_plutonium, 10:58
- Re: double D time, dedanoe, 10:57
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Robert J. Kolker, 10:43
- The anti graviti properties of spaghetti, Sam Wormhole, 10:43
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Robert J. Kolker, 10:35
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 10:27
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, Bill Hobba, 10:15
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:59
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Traveler, 09:50
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, LEFTY, 09:37
- Re: YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., brian a m stuckless, 09:20
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 09:20
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 09:16
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:56
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 08:52
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 08:32
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, surrealistic-dream, 08:14
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 08:08
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 08:07
- Re: question for the plate tectonically informed, Aidan Karley, 08:00
- Re: What's simpler than the remnant radiation of the big bang, the CMBR ?, David Thomson, 07:58
- Re: What's simpler than the remnant radiation of the big bang, the CMBR ?, David Thomson, 07:58
- Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., donstockbauer, 07:56
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 07:50
- Liquid Cooling Of Chips: Again popular ?, Robert11, 07:42
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Juan R., 07:33
- BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., Ed Conrad, 06:53
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, Ying Wan, 06:51
- Re: Where are the constants?, Clemens W, 06:39
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Black Knight, 06:38
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, Bill Hobba, 06:34
- Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, Black Knight, 06:29
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, minus, 05:13
- Re: Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, minus, 05:11
- Re: A question about lens, joshipura, 05:08
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:53
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 04:36
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism, brian a m stuckless, 04:03
- YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo (gr-qc/0511050)., brian a m stuckless, 03:28
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 03:28
- $ 3*VOLUME / AREA, per DURATiON = RADiAL velocity.!! Delta, VOLUME / surface AREA ..per second, is RADiAL velocity / 3. Unit TRiAKiSicosa VOLUME / (surf AREA*sec) is TiP-to-TiP / 6*sec. Unit SPHERiCAL VOLUME / (surface AREA*sec) is, DiAMETER / 6*sec. Unit CUBiCAL VOLUME / (surface AREA*second) = EDGEside / 6*sec. GRAViTATiONAL impulse per VOLUME; iNERTiAL impulse, per AREA.!!, brian a m stuckless, 03:28
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Helmut Wabnig, 03:23
- Re: Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods, OsherD, 03:20
- Re: Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods, OsherD, 03:09
- Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods, OsherD, 02:49
- Re: ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY, Y.Porat, 02:29
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 02:22
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 02:17
- Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Lefty, 02:10
- Powerful Magnetar Blast from Another Galaxy, Sam Wormley, 01:43
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Proginoskes, 01:11
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, franklinhu, 00:42
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 00:42
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 00:36
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 00:36
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 00:36
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 00:36
- Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Lefty, 00:24
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:18
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Lefty, 00:15
- Chaos protects networks in Athens, Sam Wormley, 00:06
November 17, 2005
- What's simpler than the remnant radiation of the big bang, the CMBR ?, Jeff_Relf, 23:54
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, hanson, 23:50
- Re: Eotvos., hanson, 23:50
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 23:37
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Aetherist, 23:35
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 23:20
- Re: Early Einstein publications online?, AES, 23:08
- Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, donstockbauer, 23:05
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 22:40
- Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, tdp1001, 22:31
- Are Postulates, Logic, and Reason Allowed in Physics? Are the String Theory Pomo Hoaxsters Destroying Science? Moving Dimensions Theory = The Renaissance, jollyrogership, 22:24
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 22:22
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Black Knight, 21:55
- Re: Where are the constants?, Eric Gisse, 21:47
- Re: Where are the constants?, Don1, 21:40
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Eric Gisse, 21:38
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 21:33
- Dr. Unruh: www.Theory.Physics.UBC.CA, Jeff_Relf, 20:52
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Eric Gisse, 20:21
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 20:16
- Re: Where are the constants?, ±, 20:10
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 19:31
- Re: Where are the constants?, Steve Ralph, 18:37
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 18:21
- Re: Where are the constants?, Old Man, 18:14
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 18:11
- Re: Where are the constants?, Doug, 17:56
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, donstockbauer, 17:54
- Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:50
- Re: Eotvos., em, 17:47
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., Black Knight, 17:43
- INNOVATIONS, J.T., 17:42
- Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel, Randy Poe, 17:42
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Old Man, 17:37
- Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel, Randy Poe, 17:36
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, donstockbauer, 17:33
- Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel, Black Knight, 17:31
- Where are the constants?, Don1, 17:09
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 17:08
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 17:02
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Traveler, 16:57
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 16:47
- Re: ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY, Black Knight, 16:38
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., Puppet_Sock, 16:26
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, hanson, 16:23
- Re: Conservation of energy, tdennis14@xxxxxxxxx, 16:18
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 16:17
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Helmut Wabnig, 16:17
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, mmeron, 16:14
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 16:13
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, hanson, 16:13
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 16:08
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., Puppet_Sock, 16:03
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, pete, 15:47
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Mark Martin, 15:42
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, a_plutonium, 15:33
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 15:24
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, a_plutonium, 15:21
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:15
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, a_plutonium, 15:13
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 15:05
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 15:05
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 14:42
- Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel, Nguyen, 14:38
- Re: Early Einstein publications online?, Timo Nieminen, 14:35
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 14:32
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 14:21
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:19
- Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel, Ian Parker, 14:13
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 14:12
- Re: ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY, tadchem, 14:12
- Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel, Nguyen, 14:05
- Re: Early Einstein publications online?, Sam Wormley, 14:01
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:47
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, T Wake, 13:35
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, T Wake, 13:34
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, T Wake, 13:33
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 13:32
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 13:31
- ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY, ACE, 13:29
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 13:28
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, FrediFizzx, 13:27
- double D time, dedanoe, 12:47
- Mam, I am BLOG, dedanoe, 12:47
- Re: Early Einstein publications online?, Jan Panteltje, 12:46
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 12:36
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 12:13
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Traveler, 11:42
- Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson's jumper was _Consumed_ by the planet earth., hanson, 11:42
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 11:37
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Y.Porat, 11:34
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., Puppet_Sock, 11:23
- Re: Early Einstein publications online?, Black Knight, 11:17
- Re: A question about lens, Matthew Lybanon, 11:12
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 11:11
- Early Einstein publications online?, AES, 11:06
- Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, Black Knight, 10:41
- Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, tdp1001, 10:35
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Traveler, 10:33
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jimp, 10:25
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:13
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 10:11
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:07
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Sam Wormley, 10:04
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 09:54
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Happy Hippy, 09:52
- Re: The speed of light is always local, with local causes, of course., David Thomson, 09:45
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 09:43
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 09:29
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 09:25
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Traveler, 09:23
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Sam Wormley, 09:21
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 09:18
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, CrankHater, 09:15
- Re: Ha_Ha_Hanson's jumper was _Consumed_ by the planet earth., CrankHater, 09:12
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 09:11
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:03
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Orion, 09:00
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, jmfbahciv, 08:51
- Re: CMBR - another explanation, donstockbauer, 08:51
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, jmfbahciv, 08:49
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, temp phys username, 08:24
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Sam Wormley, 08:15
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, donstockbauer, 08:08
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 08:06
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 07:58
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 07:56
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 07:54
- The speed of light is always local, with local causes, of course., Jeff_Relf, 06:50
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 06:37
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, Mark Martin, 06:14
- Re: How do stars form?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:12
- Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:04
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 06:01
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 05:54
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 05:45
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:45
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:41
- Ha_Ha_Hanson's jumper was _Consumed_ by the planet earth., Jeff_Relf, 05:34
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 05:10
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 05:03
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 04:23
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Helmut Wabnig, 04:21
- recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton, a_plutonium, 03:58
- Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, brian a m stuckless, 03:55
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 03:33
- Re: equations of motion/inertial measurement, victorkemp, 03:16
- Re: How do stars form?, john carruthers, 03:15
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, hanson, 02:46
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, franklinhu, 02:19
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 02:17
- Re: equations of motion/inertial measurement, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 02:13
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Black Knight, 02:01
- Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, Black Knight, 01:43
- Knowledge and Dimensional Analysis Illustrate Curious Aspects of Axioms 2: Los Alamos Natl Lab, OsherD, 01:28
- Re: equations of motion/inertial measurement, Doug, 01:08
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Black Knight, 00:47
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Black Knight, 00:36
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., Black Knight, 00:34
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Black Knight, 00:33
November 16, 2005
- equations of motion/inertial measurement, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 22:53
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 22:38
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 21:54
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 21:43
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 21:42
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, relather, 21:39
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 21:38
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 21:37
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Old Man, 21:02
- Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy", donstockbauer, 20:59
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, hanson, 20:32
- Re: Knowledge and Dimensional Analysis Illustrate Curious Aspects of Axioms, OsherD, 20:31
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 20:29
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 19:48
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Eric Gisse, 19:48
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 19:33
- How do stars form?, Sam Wormley, 19:27
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 19:26
- Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, tdp1001, 19:20
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Sam Wormley, 19:08
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:07
- Re: [QM] Trying to wrap my brain around..., Old Man, 19:01
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, Happy Dog, 18:57
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:51
- Re: Vacuum - what is it?, Traveler, 18:24
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Black Knight, 18:21
- Re: Knowledge and Dimensional Analysis Illustrate Curious Aspects of Axioms, OsherD, 17:57
- Knowledge and Dimensional Analysis Illustrate Curious Aspects of Axioms, OsherD, 17:47
- Re: Trying to wrap my brain around..., Puppet_Sock, 17:43
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Peter, 17:15
- [QM] Trying to wrap my brain around..., dgoldsmith_89, 17:01
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, T Wake, 16:57
- Re: New Telescope Opens Its Eyes, Sam Wormley, 16:55
- Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we'reall..., T Wake, 16:55
- Vacuum - what is it?, Orion, 16:54
- Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Sam Wormley, 16:43
- Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy", Sam Wormley, 16:36
- Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we'reall..., hanson, 16:17
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Wimp, 16:10
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Wimp, 16:08
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Wimp, 16:08
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Wimp, 16:08
- Re: Eotvos., hanson, 15:54
- "The Source of Gravitational Energy", Rdc, 15:42
- Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Orion, 15:42
- Re: Glomming_On, i.e. gravity and consumption, only happens in the Short_Term., Cotan Theta, 15:24
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 15:22
- Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all..., donstockbauer, 15:15
- Re: CMBR - another explanation, donstockbauer, 15:07
- "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Retic, 15:06
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, donstockbauer, 15:04
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jimp, 14:50
- Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all..., tj Frazir, 14:45
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 14:29
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:27
- Re: Eotvos., Traveler, 14:22
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 14:22
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:21
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 14:19
- Re: A question about lens, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:15
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 14:15
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, mmeron, 13:49
- Re: Fighting T_J and other suicide bombers., hanson, 13:46
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Helmut Wabnig, 13:38
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, PD, 13:24
- Re: New Telescope Opens Its Eyes, Erik, 13:23
- Re: Eotvos., hanson, 13:16
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:10
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 13:02
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 12:44
- Re: Article: Graphite Found to Exhibit Surprising Quantum Effects, Y.Porat, 12:36
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, PD, 12:35
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 12:32
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 12:25
- Re: Breakthrough Physics in Kansas, brian a m stuckless, 12:12
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Black Knight, 12:11
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Mark Martin, 12:11
- Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, Black Knight, 12:08
- Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, CWatters, 12:07
- Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dave, 11:48
- Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, jimp, 11:40
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Happy Hippy, 11:34
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Matthew Lybanon, 11:30
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 11:29
- Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, Mark Martin, 11:26
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Black Knight, 11:25
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Puppet_Sock, 11:25
- Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dr Photon, 11:19
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jimp, 11:15
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
- Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, Black Knight, 10:59
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, liquid mind, 10:52
- Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dave, 10:45
- Re: A question about lens, PD, 10:40
- Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Sam Wormley, 10:27
- Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dr Photon, 10:25
- Re: I caught a bottle of photons, AllYou!, 10:24
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, luiroto, 10:23
- Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dr Photon, 10:18
- Glomming_On, i.e. gravity and consumption, only happens in the Short_Term., Jeff_Relf, 10:15
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 10:03
- No content above this line, Sue..., 09:55
- "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Cdr, 09:53
- Housekeeping, Sue..., 09:53
- Re: I caught a bottle of photons, Sue..., 09:49
- Re: A question about lens, Richard Herring, 09:28
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 09:25
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, PD, 09:16
- Re: Maxwell's demon realised, Dave, 08:58
- Re: A question about lens, Andy Resnick, 08:48
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, temp phys username, 08:47
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 08:44
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Cotan Theta, 08:37
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 08:35
- Re: Global poverty - causes, Orion, 08:10
- Re: A question about lens, tadchem, 07:56
- Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass, tdp1001, 07:46
- Re: Maxwell's demon realised, RP, 07:45
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, tadchem, 07:33
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 07:30
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 07:27
- Re: Global poverty - causes, Mark Martin, 07:26
- Re: Eotvos., brian a m stuckless, 07:14
- Why LiGHT c increases ELiMiNATE HUBBLE's SPACEs. Why LiGHT c increases to iNVERSE PARTiCLE COUNT. Why LiGHT v goes iNVERSE to PATH PARTiCLE COUNT. GR SPACE-time "curvature" is falling, is falling.!! Bohr RADiUS is the PROOF of jOE FiSHER EXPANSiON.!!, brian a m stuckless, 07:14
- Re: Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 07:08
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 06:58
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 06:26
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, jmfbahciv, 06:16
- Re: GR-c goes "instantaneously" from 0 to c ..in NO time.!! But jOE, Tom Roberts says LiGHT "STOPs slowing down".!! [ Does SPEED c "STOP slowing down" instantaneously.? ] [ Does VELOCiTY c "STOP slowing down" ..automatically.? ] Does LiGHT "STOP slowing down" instantaneously automatically.?!! What is "simultaneity" for TWO different POiNTs on a TiME-line.?, donstockbauer, 06:15
- Re: A question about lens, donstockbauer, 06:11
- A question about lens, joshipura, 06:04
- Re: 911, Wtc on MSNBC - Controlled demolition proven again, donstockbauer, 05:52
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 05:46
- Re: 911, Wtc on MSNBC - Controlled demolition proven again, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:46
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 05:36
- 911, Wtc on MSNBC - Controlled demolition proven again, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer, 05:33
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx, 05:29
- Fighting T_J and other suicide bombers., Jeff_Relf, 05:25
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:33
- Maxwell's demon realised, Dr Photon, 04:23
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, Mike Lepore, 04:22
- Re: New look for optical microscopy, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:20
- GR-c goes "instantaneously" from 0 to c ..in NO time.!! But jOE, Tom Roberts says LiGHT "STOPs slowing down".!! [ Does SPEED c "STOP slowing down" instantaneously.? ] [ Does VELOCiTY c "STOP slowing down" ..automatically.? ] Does LiGHT "STOP slowing down" instantaneously automatically.?!! What is "simultaneity" for TWO different POiNTs on a TiME-line.?, brian a m stuckless, 04:15
- Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?, CWatters, 03:37
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, temp phys username, 03:32
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 03:28
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 03:22
- Re: periodic table as concentric rings of 16, Y.Porat, 03:18
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, The Ghost In The Machine, 03:00
- Re: Glomming_On, i.e. gravity and consumption, only happens in the Short_Term., hanson, 02:58
- Re: Determinant-Matrix-PI "Exact" Relationship, OsherD, 02:28
- Re: Determinant-Matrix-PI "Exact" Relationship, OsherD, 02:24
- Re: Determinant-Matrix-PI "Exact" Relationship, OsherD, 01:59
- An Application for Infrared Scanning?, mwmiller314, 01:29
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 01:19
- Graduate Level Math Books For Sale, dgiaimo@xxxxxxxxx, 01:18
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., June R Harton, 01:14
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 00:56
- Global poverty - causes, Orion, 00:53
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Happy Hippy, 00:42
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 00:39
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 00:35
- Glomming_On, i.e. gravity and consumption, only happens in the Short_Term., Jeff_Relf, 00:31
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 00:20
November 15, 2005
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, nightbat, 23:57
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Orion, 23:53
- Re: tj says that hanson is a ing moron., hanson, 23:49
- Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all..., hanson, 23:49
- Re: tj Frazir's Lame Powerless Engine, his LPE, hanson, 23:49
- Re: tj says that hanson is a ing moron., hanson, 23:49
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 23:16
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, hanson, 23:16
- T_J's _Extreme_Paranoia_and_Delusions_of_Grandeur_., Jeff_Relf, 22:56
- New look for optical microscopy, Sam Wormley, 22:38
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, mmeron, 22:23
- Re: Gravity NEUTRALIZING Air / Spacecraft, or ZERO / REDUCED- Gravity Chamber, FDISK, 22:12
- Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all ..., tj Frazir, 21:47
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 21:29
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 21:13
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 20:26
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Tice with a J, 20:25
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Tice with a J, 20:23
- Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, xinyongfu, 20:04
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 19:59
- Research group needs your input, project . crossover, 19:42
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Boris Mohar, 19:24
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark Martin, 19:10
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Mark-T, 19:10
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, David Wimp, 19:03
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Bill Hobba, 18:41
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 18:33
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Black Knight, 18:32
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 18:12
- Re: Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge 2: Unitary, Random, etc., OsherD, 18:08
- Re: Article: Graphite Found to Exhibit Surprising Quantum Effects, Sam Wormley, 18:05
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Black Knight, 17:53
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Old Man, 17:39
- Article: Graphite Found to Exhibit Surprising Quantum Effects, Robert Karl Stonjek, 17:12
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., AllYou!, 17:09
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, PD, 16:47
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 16:33
- Re: Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge 2: Unitary, Random, etc., OsherD, 16:30
- Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Puppet_Sock, 16:22
- Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge 2: Unitary, Random, etc., OsherD, 16:19
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., jollyrogership, 16:13
- Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 15:58
- Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug, Sam Wormley, 15:57
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:50
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Black Knight, 15:47
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, jimp, 15:45
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, carlip-nospam, 15:20
- Re: A second great depression, Orion, 15:12
- Re: A second great depression, Orion, 15:06
- T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all so retarded ?, Jeff_Relf, 14:54
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Puppet_Sock, 14:51
- Re: tj says that hanson is a ing moron., tj Frazir, 14:51
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, jimp, 14:45
- Re: T_J has no place to invest., tj Frazir, 14:22
- Re: tj says that hanson is a ing moron., tj Frazir, 14:11
- Re: Why kitchen foil makes so much noise, CWatters, 14:10
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 14:08
- Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Sam Wormley, 14:06
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 14:05
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 14:01
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:58
- "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Cdr, 13:57
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 13:52
- Re: Why kitchen foil makes so much noise, Mark Fergerson, 13:51
- Re: A second great depression, Puppet_Sock, 13:48
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, tadchem, 13:45
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 13:42
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 13:33
- Re: A second great depression, donstockbauer, 13:27
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx, 13:24
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, mmeron, 13:19
- Re: tj Frazir's Lame Powerless Engine, his LPE, T Wake, 13:01
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Tom Roberts, 12:56
- Re: The proof of mass vector., dedanoe, 12:38
- Re: A second great depression, dedanoe, 12:28
- Re: periodic table as concentric rings of 16, PD, 12:10
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Black Knight, 11:52
- Re: tj Frazir's Lame Powerless Engine, his LPE, tj Frazir, 11:40
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, Keith Williams, 11:16
- periodic table as concentric rings of 16, Happy Hippy, 11:06
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 10:52
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 10:48
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, tj Frazir, 10:37
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, PD, 10:22
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, PD, 10:20
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jimp, 10:05
- Re: Why kitchen foil makes so much noise, tadchem, 10:01
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, tadchem, 09:57
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 09:48
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, tadchem, 09:37
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Dave, 09:32
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 09:20
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, Black Knight, 09:18
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., Black Knight, 09:17
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, jmfbahciv, 09:16
- Re: can c approach zero?, Black Knight, 09:11
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, PD, 09:07
- Why kitchen foil makes so much noise, ceauke, 08:52
- Re: CMBR - another explanation, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 08:39
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, temp phys username, 08:35
- Re: electromagnetism, Orion, 08:25
- Re: electromagnetism, krishna, 08:20
- Re: Biophysics Texts, The Unstable Concoction of Fascinet, 08:18
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, donstockbauer, 08:17
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 08:02
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, jmfbahciv, 07:57
- Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., donstockbauer, 07:55
- MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM., jollyrogership, 07:42
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, donstockbauer, 07:38
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, donstockbauer, 07:37
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 07:33
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:28
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, Ross A. Finlayson, 07:11
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 07:03
- T_J has no place to invest., Jeff_Relf, 06:47
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 06:40
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 06:36
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 06:35
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 06:32
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 06:31
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 06:29
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, kuttu, 06:18
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, jmfbahciv, 06:17
- Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=, Ross A. Finlayson, 05:46
- Math, Sue..., 05:34
- LiGHT velocity c is NOW a MATHEMATiCAL constant ..just as is, pi.!! LiGHT velocity c is NOW a, transcendental, MATHEMATiCAL constant.!! LiGHT velocity v VARiEs, inversely, WiTH the PATH particle COUNT.!!, brian a m stuckless, 05:17
- Re: can c approach zero?, Tresa, 05:14
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 04:51
- YAB-a-dab-a-doo.!!, brian a m stuckless, 04:45
- YAB-a-dab-a-doo.!!, brian a m stuckless, 04:45
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 04:45
- Re: "Zombie Physics", tdp1001, 03:59
- Re: Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge, OsherD, 03:09
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 02:49
- Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 02:47
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 02:47
- Re: Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge, OsherD, 02:46
- Re: can c approach zero?, Tresa, 02:37
- Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge, OsherD, 02:27
- Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 02:19
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, Lefty, 01:50
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Happy Hippy, 01:41
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, Happy Hippy, 01:37
- Re: Italy: Corrupt Selection of Academic Staff, pete, 00:37
- Re: The Harmonic Representation of Particles, FrediFizzx, 00:16
- Re: Gisse, get a better newsreader, and learn how to use it., Eric Gisse, 00:14
- Italy: Corrupt Selection of Academic Staff, David Aliaga, 00:07
November 14, 2005
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, donstockbauer, 23:24
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, nospam, 23:17
- tj says that he is a ing moron., hanson, 23:17
- tj Frazir's Lame Powerless Engine, his LPE, hanson, 23:11
- Re: can c approach zero?, donstockbauer, 23:03
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, mmeron, 22:53
- Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 22:51
- Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 22:45
- Gisse, get a better newsreader, and learn how to use it., Jeff_Relf, 22:40
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, janey3white, 22:23
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, tadchem, 22:10
- Google's newsreader., Jeff_Relf, 21:55
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, Happy Dog, 21:51
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, Steven Gray, 21:42
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, Steven Gray, 21:38
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, donstockbauer, 21:24
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:19
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, donstockbauer, 21:19
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, Black Knight, 21:14
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:10
- Re: can c approach zero?, RP, 20:58
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, Jerry bryson, 20:56
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 20:50
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Black Knight, 20:43
- Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists, David Thomson, 20:29
- Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Black Knight, 20:29
- Re: can c approach zero?, Tresa, 20:29
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Old Man, 20:07
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, OG, 19:42
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, odin, 19:12
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 19:10
- Re: Frazir rants again., T Wake, 19:08
- Re: Dr. tj Frazir, PhD in physics & math..... from Rusha, T Wake, 19:07
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, imaginatorium, 19:06
- Re: Frazir has a foggy brain, T Wake, 19:03
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, M . L ., 18:58
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 18:57
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 18:56
- Re: Dr. tj Frazir, PhD in physics & math..... from Rusha, tj Frazir, 18:55
- Re: ing morons., tj Frazir, 18:52
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 18:46
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 18:43
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 18:35
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, arvee, 18:27
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 18:23
- Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 18:18
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 17:55
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Dori, 17:53
- Re: can c approach zero?, Tresa, 17:24
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Orion, 17:22
- Re: Kinetic Energy Etc, jclause, 17:15
- Re: Kinetic Energy Etc, jclause, 17:13
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, mmeron, 16:47
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Double-A, 16:37
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, odin, 16:36
- Re: can c approach zero?, mmeron, 16:34
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, PD, 16:19
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:18
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 16:15
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:13
- Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?, PD, 16:12
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 16:11
- Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles 2x4 plastic Sheet WOW, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:09
- Re: Determinants, Knowledge, and PI, OsherD, 16:04
- Re: Determinants, Knowledge, and PI, OsherD, 15:48
- Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles 2x4 plastic Sheet WOW, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:48
- How do I say these scientific notation terms?, janey3white, 15:39
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, PD, 15:37
- Re: chinese slurp too much when they eat, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:35
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, PD, 15:32
- Re: Frazir continues..., T Wake, 15:29
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, T Wake, 15:26
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., T Wake, 15:21
- Re: T_J has a PhD in physics... from where ? !, T Wake, 15:19
- Re: A generic derivation of weights and measures, Sam Wormley, 15:17
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Timo Nieminen, 15:13
- GUESS adopted Fischer Expansion., brian a m stuckless, 15:11
- A generic derivation of weights and measures, Don1, 15:06
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, PD, 15:01
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 14:55
- can c approach zero?, Tresa, 14:50
- Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, Anders Eklöf, 14:46
- Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:32
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Tom Roberts, 14:19
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Tom Roberts, 14:12
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, tadchem, 14:10
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Black Knight, 13:59
- Re: CMBR - another explanation, Orion, 13:54
- Re: Biophysics Texts, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:53
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Traveler, 13:48
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, tadchem, 13:42
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, RP, 13:31
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Themistocles, 13:28
- Re: electromagnetism, Black Knight, 13:10
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 13:07
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Themistocles, 13:05
- Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Black Knight, 13:04
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:02
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Themistocles, 13:01
- Dr. tj Frazir, PhD in physics & math..... from Rusha, hanson, 12:59
- Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Black Knight, 12:52
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Themistocles, 12:48
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Themistocles, 12:42
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 12:34
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 12:31
- Re: Determinants, Knowledge, and PI, nospam, 12:18
- Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Dr Photon, 12:03
- Determinants, Knowledge, and PI, OsherD, 12:02
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, briggs, 11:53
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Mark Martin, 11:46
- Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, Dr Photon, 11:41
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 11:41
- Re: electromagnetism, Dr Photon, 11:28
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Jan Panteltje, 11:27
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, John Black, 11:25
- tj Frazir's 3rd peddler attempt on hanson, hanson, 11:24
- Re: "Zombie Physics", Sam Wormley, 11:22
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, tadchem, 11:21
- Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", SBC Yahoo, 11:20
- Re: The Harmonic Representation of Particles, Autymn D. C., 11:17
- Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Sam Wormley, 11:14
- Re: CMBR - another explanation, tadchem, 11:10
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Dr Photon, 11:08
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Tom Roberts, 11:07
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Happy Hippy, 10:56
- "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Cdr, 10:52
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, hanson, 10:50
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 10:42
- Re: The proof of mass vector., PD, 10:39
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 10:36
- Re: World War II in the Pacific, Puppet_Sock, 10:28
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jimp, 10:25
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, PD, 10:24
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 10:22
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 10:11
- Re: CMBR - another explanation, Sam Wormley, 10:03
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Black Knight, 09:41
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 09:31
- Re: patterns on swimming pool floor, Black Knight, 09:29
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 09:27
- Occult Explanation For The Four Basic Forces & The Missing Fifth Force, Wizard of Odd, 09:21
- Re: A second great depression, Greysky, 09:20
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Happy Hippy, 09:20
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Jan Panteltje, 09:18
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 09:10
- Re: Biophysics Texts, The Unstable Concoction of Fascinet, 09:00
- Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 11 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Andy Resnick, 08:59
- Re: Eric_Gisse, forget about me., Eric Gisse, 08:58
- Re: patterns on swimming pool floor, Andy Resnick, 08:53
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:40
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, Andy Resnick, 08:38
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 08:37
- Re: Biophysics Texts, Andy Resnick, 08:31
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Black Knight, 08:24
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:15
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Voice of Wisdom, 07:57
- Re: "Zombie Physics", donstockbauer, 07:41
- Re: CMBR - another explanation, donstockbauer, 07:30
- Re: "Zombie Physics", tdp1001, 07:29
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jollyrogership, 07:05
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Jan Panteltje, 06:58
- CMBR - another explanation, Orion, 06:45
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, donstockbauer, 06:40
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Voice of Wisdom, 06:32
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 06:22
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 06:19
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 06:17
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 06:14
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 06:12
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Lloyd Parker, 06:10
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Gerard van Wilgen, 06:09
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 06:07
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 06:04
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 06:03
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 06:02
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, tadchem, 05:57
- Eric_Gisse, forget about me., Jeff_Relf, 05:41
- A second great depression, Orion, 05:41
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 14, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:41
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 05:39
- Re: tell me if my site is visible for you, dedanoe, 05:34
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 05:21
- Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, Jean-Paul Turcaud, 04:47
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 04:46
- Re: Knowledge "Operator" Creates Mass, Tensors, and QM 3: More on L, OsherD, 03:48
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Steve Ralph, 03:46
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 03:46
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Bilge, 03:32
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, Mike Lepore, 03:26
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 03:22
- Knowledge "Operator" Creates Mass, Tensors, and QM 3: More on L, OsherD, 02:53
- Re: electromagnetism, krishna, 02:26
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx, 02:07
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 00:17
- Re: Each post has it's own thread., Eric Gisse, 00:11
November 13, 2005
- Galaxies may have spit out monster black hole, neutrino750, 23:58
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 23:54
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., tj Frazir, 23:41
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., tj Frazir, 23:39
- T_J, X_City is something you created in your dreams., Jeff_Relf, 23:25
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., tj Frazir, 23:20
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., tj Frazir, 23:19
- Re: T_J has a PhD in physics... from where ? !, tj Frazir, 22:54
- Re: Frazir gets it right at last!, tj Frazir, 22:51
- Each post has it's own thread., Jeff_Relf, 22:43
- Re: Physics and Astronomy Fun, Black Knight, 22:39
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 22:33
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 22:20
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Autymn D. C., 22:10
- Knowledge "Operator" Creates Mass, Tensors, and QM 2: QM, OsherD, 22:09
- Re: Frazir gets it right at last!, tj Frazir, 21:58
- T_J has a PhD in physics... from where ? !, Jeff_Relf, 21:57
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 21:46
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, salmonegg, 21:34
- Physics and Astronomy Fun, Mike Jr., 21:32
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 21:29
- Biophysics Texts, The Unstable Concoction of Fascinet, 21:26
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Old Man, 20:58
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:50
- Knowledge "Operator" Creates Mass, Tensors, and QM, OsherD, 20:39
- Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:32
- The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 20:26
- Re: Frazir gets it right at last!, The Ghost In The Machine, 20:00
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 19:11
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, Bob Cain, 19:05
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:02
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, Black Knight, 19:00
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Bob Cain, 18:59
- Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:56
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Black Knight, 18:55
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Sam Wormley, 18:53
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 18:43
- Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:26
- Re: tell me if my site is visible for you, OG, 17:57
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Black Knight, 17:47
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Jan Panteltje, 17:32
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 17:23
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, Steven Gray, 17:18
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 17:17
- tell me if my site is visible for you, dedanoe, 17:12
- Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, Black Knight, 16:45
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Gerard van Wilgen, 16:37
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, mmeron, 16:30
- Re: "Zombie Physics", Happy Hippy, 16:13
- Re: "Zombie Physics", Happy Hippy, 16:10
- Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, tensor, 16:01
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Timo Nieminen, 15:40
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Jan Panteltje, 15:38
- Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, Twittering One, 15:38
- Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, Mars McLue, 15:09
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 14:52
- Re: Frazir gets it right at last!, donstockbauer, 14:47
- Re: Frazir gets it right at last!, T Wake, 14:40
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, T Wake, 14:40
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, donstockbauer, 14:31
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, ianparker2, 14:27
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 14:15
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 13:46
- Re: "Fan"-driven pendulum simulation?, jswitte, 13:39
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Jan Panteltje, 13:38
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 13:31
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Gerard van Wilgen, 13:05
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., hanson, 12:58
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 12:38
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Stevie B, 12:34
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, donstockbauer, 12:25
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, donstockbauer, 12:17
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, newedana, 12:14
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, donstockbauer, 12:05
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, donstockbauer, 12:02
- GR soap-on-a-rope, brian a m stuckless, 11:54
- Re: Many writers fail to emphasis important facts about gravity theory, brian a m stuckless, 11:54
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:09
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 10:57
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:55
- Re: fine-man's luck-ters, T Wake, 10:41
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:33
- Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jimp, 10:30
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Gregory L. Hansen, 10:26
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:20
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 10:16
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Anton Vredegoor, 10:01
- Re: fine-man's luck-ters, oldton, 10:01
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Traveler, 09:58
- Re: fine-man's luck-ters, Black Knight, 09:53
- fine-man's luck-ters, oldton, 09:33
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Traveler, 09:29
- Why are some transparent oxides electrically conductive?, JAH, 09:22
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Voice of Wisdom, 09:19
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Black Knight, 09:18
- Re: help, oldton, 09:16
- Re: help, oldton, 09:13
- Re: "Zombie Physics", Black Knight, 09:10
- Gun cleaning paraphernalia question, jmfbahciv, 09:01
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 08:29
- Re: "Zombie Physics", Sam Wormley, 08:27
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, donstockbauer, 08:23
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 08:10
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, jmfbahciv, 08:09
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Steve Ralph, 08:08
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, donstockbauer, 07:57
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, pete, 07:49
- Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Charles, 07:42
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 07:40
- How many bits are necessary to store the universe?, Eliot Coweye, 06:52
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), bz, 06:41
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, CWatters, 06:36
- google gobbles :o), Sue..., 06:02
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 06:01
- Re: making donuts with levers..., dedanoe, 06:01
- CorelDRAW proves Newton's gravity WRONG!!!, dedanoe, 05:56
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., T Wake, 05:32
- Re: Frazir is boringly repetetive, T Wake, 05:29
- Re: There are *THEORETiCAL models*, *MATHEMATiCAL models* and *REAL* models. There are, actually, NO *PHYSiCAL* theories, what-so-ever, you dimwit.!! And, the "theory" is NOT the "mathematics" (i.e. "arithmetic"), dooOP.!! Ph. Tivitists NEVER want to find that "underlying reality" (and, what that means). It is finished for them, if we EVER find the "underlying reality". There'd be no more "girls Friday", if you know what i mean. However, we TRY to *PiECE TOGETHER* "underlying [bits of] reality" with various MODELs. MODELs are TRiALs & ERRORs of the "underlying reality"., Martin Brown, 05:27
- Re: Suicide bombers are hideously deluded., T Wake, 05:24
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:50
- Re: "Fan"-driven pendulum simulation?, CWatters, 04:34
- Ken's gravity, Fred's photons, Ken S. Tucker, 04:12
- Re: Did Einstein say this, brian a m stuckless, 03:33
- However, SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ is *NOT* "part and parcel of the theories used with great success throughout modern physics. SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ has NEVER been RELATED TO T_uv MASS.!! iRONiCALLY, there is, actually, NO GR-SPACE-time-*CURVATURE*.!!, brian a m stuckless, 03:33
- Re: Attraction VS geometry, brian a m stuckless, 03:33
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 03:32
- Re: There are *THEORETiCAL models*, *MATHEMATiCAL models* and *REAL* models. There are, actually, NO *PHYSiCAL* theories, what-so-ever, you dimwit.!! And, the "theory" is NOT the "mathematics" (i.e. "arithmetic"), dooOP.!! Ph. Tivitists NEVER want to find that "underlying reality" (and, what that means). It is finished for them, if we EVER find the "underlying reality". There'd be no more "girls Friday", if you know what i mean. However, we TRY to *PiECE TOGETHER* "underlying [bits of] reality" with various MODELs. MODELs are TRiALs & ERRORs of the "underlying reality"., Y.Porat, 03:20
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 03:10
- There are *THEORETiCAL models*, *MATHEMATiCAL models* and *REAL* models. There are, actually, NO *PHYSiCAL* theories, what-so-ever, you dimwit.!! And, the "theory" is NOT the "mathematics" (i.e. "arithmetic"), dooOP.!! Ph. Tivitists NEVER want to find that "underlying reality" (and, what that means). It is finished for them, if we EVER find the "underlying reality". There'd be no more "girls Friday", if you know what i mean. However, we TRY to *PiECE TOGETHER* "underlying [bits of] reality" with various MODELs. MODELs are TRiALs & ERRORs of the "underlying reality"., brian a m stuckless, 03:05
- Re: Attraction VS geometry, brian a m stuckless, 03:05
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., mike3, 02:28
- "Zombie Physics", tdp1001, 02:17
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., Eric Gisse, 01:43
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), FrediFizzx, 01:24
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, hanson, 01:07
- "Fan"-driven pendulum simulation?, jswitte, 00:58
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., tj Frazir, 00:54
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, yyyiiinnnggg, 00:52
- Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem, tj Frazir, 00:46
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, hanson, 00:44
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., donstockbauer, 00:31
- Re: Suicide bombers are hideously deluded., tj Frazir, 00:20
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., tj Frazir, 00:06
November 12, 2005
- Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else., donstockbauer, 23:50
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 23:49
- Re: Suicide bombers are hideously deluded., Eric Gisse, 23:21
- New_York_Boy, are you totally isolated from all this ? !, Jeff_Relf, 23:11
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Art Deco, 23:06
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), FrediFizzx, 22:54
- Re: Suicide bombers are hideously deluded., donstockbauer, 22:51
- MIT research could clear up foggy problem, Sam Wormley, 22:49
- Suicide bombers are hideously deluded., Jeff_Relf, 22:38
- New Telescope Opens Its Eyes, Sam Wormley, 22:31
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Herman Trivilino, 22:30
- Re: TJ FRAZIR is a moron, NunYa Bidness, 22:04
- Re: Osher talks unkOsher about tj Frazir, NunYa Bidness, 21:56
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 21:56
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 21:50
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 21:47
- Re: Dimensional consistency, donstockbauer, 21:36
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, donstockbauer, 21:32
- Re: photon, Old Man, 21:29
- Re: Dimensional consistency, odin, 21:29
- Re: help, donstockbauer, 21:23
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Eric Gisse, 20:58
- Re: Kinetic Energy Etc, OG, 20:34
- photon, Happy Hippy, 20:25
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 20:22
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 20:19
- Re: Kinetic Energy Etc, Steven Gray, 20:19
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, nobody, 19:59
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 19:56
- The transistor is not applicable in the commericial world., Black Knight, 19:55
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, Potrzebie Kaddidlethump, 19:44
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Old Man, 19:27
- Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, Black Knight, 19:26
- Re: Attraction VS geometry, brian a m stuckless, 19:00
- Re: Article: History of Physics - Paul Dirac, Black Knight, 18:46
- Re: Kinetic Energy Etc, Herman Trivilino, 18:45
- Re: LiGHT screams from the assylum, brian a m stuckless, 18:43
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Herman Trivilino, 18:36
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Sam Wormley, 18:35
- Kinetic Energy Etc, jclause, 18:34
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Herman Trivilino, 18:30
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Old Man, 18:19
- Re: Creation and Annihilation Operators and Knowledge, Tresa, 18:11
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., T Wake, 17:57
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., T Wake, 17:57
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Eric Gisse, 17:52
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Orion, 17:37
- Re: Double slit experiment questions A million holes and 1 photon, Sam Wormley, 17:21
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, mmeron, 17:20
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, mmeron, 17:12
- Re: Article: History of Physics - Paul Dirac, OsherD, 17:06
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:05
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, Monica I., 17:04
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 17:00
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., tj Frazir, 16:59
- Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, Richard Tobin, 16:57
- Re: Double slit experiment questions A million holes and 1 photon, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:47
- Creation and Annihilation Operators and Knowledge, OsherD, 16:18
- Article: History of Physics - Paul Dirac, Robert Karl Stonjek, 16:03
- Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles, Timo Nieminen, 15:37
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Timo Nieminen, 15:35
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 15:34
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Orion, 15:29
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 15:16
- Re: Why CHiCKEN LiTTLE "felt", "NO feeling".!!, tensor, 14:56
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 14:47
- Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents 2: P(A-->B) = K, OsherD, 14:37
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:28
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 14:13
- Re: Network math leads to an alternative, simpler ranking scheme, Ian Parker, 14:11
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 14:09
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 14:05
- Re: The Harmonic Representation of Particles, FrediFizzx, 14:03
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Black Knight, 13:58
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 13:53
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 13:36
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 13:35
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 13:30
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), FrediFizzx, 13:29
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 13:28
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 13:25
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 13:22
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 13:10
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Happy Hippy, 12:59
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., tj Frazir, 12:50
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., tj Frazir, 12:37
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, jimp, 12:20
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:03
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:03
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, hanson, 11:56
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 11:56
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, hanson, 11:56
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 11:55
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., hanson, 11:33
- Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, hanson, 11:29
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), nightbat, 11:23
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Tom Roberts, 11:03
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., T Wake, 10:59
- Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, T Wake, 10:58
- Re: help, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:50
- Re: help, tadchem, 10:47
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Herman Trivilino, 10:47
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Gregory L. Hansen, 10:43
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:37
- Re: LiGHT screams from the assylum, Sue..., 10:35
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Herman Trivilino, 10:29
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Herman Trivilino, 10:19
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 10:18
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:15
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Don1, 10:14
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:05
- Re: LiGHT velocity v VARiEs, inversely, WiTH the path PARTiCLE COUNT.!! LiGHT velocity c is NOW a MATHEMATiCAL constant ..just as is, pi.!! You will NEED essentially in theory, a *well-defined* LaGrangian.!! $ NEW SI GUESS iSS CODATA LaGrangian L: L = h*fL = nL*h*c / wl = nA*{mph}*ls*c^2 / rA = m1*c^2 = E - eM - eV = eK - eV = eM - eF = [(m1*v1^2 / 2)*(m1/M1 + 1)]., Sue..., 10:02
- LiGHT velocity v VARiEs, inversely, WiTH the path PARTiCLE COUNT.!! LiGHT velocity c is NOW a MATHEMATiCAL constant ..just as is, pi.!! You will NEED essentially in theory, a *well-defined* LaGrangian.!! $ NEW SI GUESS iSS CODATA LaGrangian L: L = h*fL = nL*h*c / wl = nA*{mph}*ls*c^2 / rA = m1*c^2 = E - eM - eV = eK - eV = eM - eF = [(m1*v1^2 / 2)*(m1/M1 + 1)]., brian a m stuckless, 09:59
- Re: A little challenge for relativists., brian a m stuckless, 09:59
- Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles, Y.Porat, 09:56
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:54
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:51
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:49
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Black Knight, 09:37
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Black Knight, 09:29
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, PD, 09:29
- Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles, Jan Panteltje, 09:13
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, jesper pedersen, 08:45
- Re: help, donstockbauer, 08:33
- Re: help, Sam Wormley, 08:26
- Network math leads to an alternative, simpler ranking scheme, Sam Wormley, 08:23
- That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles, Sam Wormley, 08:22
- Sound waves target new applications, Sam Wormley, 08:20
- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 11 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 08:20
- Why CHiCKEN LiTTLE "felt", "NO feeling".!!, brian a m stuckless, 08:15
- Why CHiCKEN LiTTLE "felt", "NO feeling".!!, brian a m stuckless, 08:14
- Re: Many writers fail to emphasis important facts about gravity theory, brian a m stuckless, 08:14
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 08:13
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Mike Lepore, 07:45
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 07:17
- Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, john_ramsden, 07:12
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 07:06
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 07:04
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 06:36
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 06:28
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 06:10
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 06:07
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, physics grad, 06:07
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Sue..., 06:00
- Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, tj Frazir, 05:56
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, physics grad, 05:50
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 05:28
- Re: Dimensional consistency, Bob Cain, 04:48
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., tj Frazir, 04:46
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Eric Gisse, 04:30
- Re: Prohibition: Mental health is a far, Far, _Far_ greater issue., John Bailo, 04:12
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 03:49
- Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, hanson, 03:14
- SiR CRANK-a-LOT, brian a m stuckless, 02:54
- Re: Do these questions about Maxwell's Equations make sense?, brian a m stuckless, 02:54
- SiR CRANK-a-LOT, brian a m stuckless, 02:54
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Timo Nieminen, 02:48
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Francis Rey, 02:41
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 5: P^K vs K^P, OsherD, 01:57
- Re: help, Black Knight, 01:56
- K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 5: P^K vs K^P, OsherD, 01:50
- Lunar Lawn Mower, Mike Jr., 01:49
- Re: What happens when space expands?, Y.Porat, 01:48
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Black Knight, 01:32
- help, oldton, 01:29
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 01:29
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 01:14
- Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, donstockbauer, 01:07
- Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir, hanson, 00:58
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., hanson, 00:58
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., hanson, 00:58
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 4: Wave Function and PI as Exponents, OsherD, 00:46
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 4: Wave Function and PI as Exponents, OsherD, 00:00
November 11, 2005
- Births and deaths are notional, and mostly the product of outside forces., Jeff_Relf, 23:52
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 4: Wave Function and PI as Exponents, OsherD, 23:51
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Dori, 23:41
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Dr. Flonkenstein, 23:32
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 4: Wave Function and PI as Exponents, OsherD, 23:23
- K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 4: Wave Function and PI as Exponents, OsherD, 23:00
- Prohibition: Mental health is a far, Far, _Far_ greater issue., Jeff_Relf, 22:44
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, oxazoline, 22:35
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 21:44
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Sue..., 21:39
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, donstockbauer, 21:37
- Re: Double slit experiment questions A million holes and 1 photon, Sam Wormley, 21:30
- Re: Relativity... its fruits of the labor, Sam Wormley, 21:24
- Re: Dimensional consistency, donstockbauer, 21:19
- Re: Dimensional consistency, xxein, 21:10
- Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?, Old Man, 20:35
- Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, vector, 19:57
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., T Wake, 19:57
- Re: T.J.'s a drug addict who _Must_ con people to feed his habit., T Wake, 19:56
- Dimensional consistency, Don1, 19:45
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 2: Left-Inner-Product, OsherD, 19:31
- Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 19:29
- Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith, Themistocles, 19:22
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Themistocles, 19:18
- Re: What happens when space expands?, Nick, 19:11
- K&K Mechanics, Jordan Glassman, 19:11
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, carlip-nospam, 18:48
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 18:43
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., tj Frazir, 18:41
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, oxazoline, 18:37
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Black Knight, 18:29
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Michael Baldwin Bruce, 18:13
- Re: T.J.'s a drug addict who _Must_ con people to feed his habit., tj Frazir, 18:08
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Art Deco, 18:08
- Re: I prefer to stay in my room... preferrably alone and in the dark., Jeff_Relf, 18:08
- Re: I prefer to stay in my room... preferrably alone and in the dark., Eric Gisse, 17:57
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Old Man, 17:47
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, codesuidae, 17:41
- Illiterate Davd A. Smith, Black Knight, 17:40
- Re: What happens when space expands?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:20
- Re: Double slit experiment questions A million holes and 1 photon, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:56
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:52
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, John Black, 16:33
- Re: I prefer to stay in my room... preferrably alone and in the dark., John A. Bailo, 16:29
- Relativity... its fruits of the labor, hanson, 16:28
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 3: Robots and Cellular Automata, OsherD, 15:55
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 15:55
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., hanson, 15:52
- Re: T.J.'s a drug addict who _Must_ con people to feed his habit., hanson, 15:52
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 15:47
- I prefer to stay in my room... preferrably alone and in the dark., Jeff_Relf, 15:47
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 15:36
- K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 3: Robots and Cellular Automata, OsherD, 15:35
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, shevek, 15:19
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 11 Nov 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 15:04
- T.J.'s a drug addict who _Must_ con people to feed his habit., Jeff_Relf, 14:59
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 2: Left-Inner-Product, OsherD, 14:43
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., mike3, 14:35
- Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, W. Watson, 14:34
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, donstockbauer, 14:32
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 2: Left-Inner-Product, donstockbauer, 14:27
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, carlip-nospam, 14:27
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 2: Left-Inner-Product, OsherD, 14:22
- K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T) 2: Left-Inner-Product, OsherD, 14:16
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Herman Trivilino, 14:15
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Herman Trivilino, 14:04
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 13:58
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, donstockbauer, 13:51
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 13:30
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 13:21
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, mmeron, 13:16
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 13:08
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 12:58
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 12:45
- making donuts with levers..., dedanoe, 12:33
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Orion, 12:26
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., chrisv, 12:20
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 12:19
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 12:17
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 11:58
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 11:51
- Re: [OT?] Destroying data on bank card, Bob Eager, 11:41
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 11:31
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Sam Wormley, 11:27
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, hanson, 11:18
- Re: No good deed goes unpunished., John Bailo, 11:08
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Happy Hippy, 11:00
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 10:54
- Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:49
- No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway., hanson, 10:36
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Herman Trivilino, 10:33
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Herman Trivilino, 10:30
- Re: Nonlinear equations, Puppet_Sock, 10:27
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 10:17
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 10:16
- THE PHOTON, ACE, 10:03
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 09:27
- Stockbauer, Why don't you just reply to the article you're quoting from ?, Jeff_Relf, 09:25
- Re: Nonlinear equations, John Christiansen, 09:20
- Re: Nonlinear equations, Ian Parker, 09:19
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 08:52
- Re: What would this look like?, Black Knight, 08:51
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:49
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Lloyd Parker, 08:46
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Black Knight, 08:44
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Black Knight, 08:41
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 08:40
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Black Knight, 08:27
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:23
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 08:22
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 08:22
- Nonlinear equations, Javier, 08:20
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 08:09
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 08:04
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Y.Porat, 07:42
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Dr Photon, 07:37
- Re: Search engines are not unfair, Jan Panteltje, 07:33
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, donstockbauer, 07:27
- Re: Search engines are not unfair, donstockbauer, 07:22
- Re: Social mores., donstockbauer, 07:15
- Social mores., Jeff_Relf, 07:04
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, donstockbauer, 07:01
- Re: Search engines are not unfair, jmfbahciv, 06:58
- Re: Search engines are not unfair, Jan Panteltje, 06:55
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., pete, 06:54
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Helmut Wabnig, 06:48
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Helmut Wabnig, 06:42
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), brian a m stuckless, 06:07
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang, hog . badger, 05:53
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Double-A, 05:52
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Sue..., 05:10
- Alternatives to physics Ph.D?, physics grad, 04:58
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, nightbat, 04:40
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., mike3, 04:39
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Ken S. Tucker, 04:18
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Dori, 03:45
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 03:43
- Re: Hot Metal Glowing., Dori, 03:41
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Sue..., 03:37
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 03:36
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 03:33
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 03:33
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 03:21
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 03:15
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 03:14
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 03:08
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, john0714@xxxxxxx, 02:38
- Hot Metal Glowing., mike3, 02:30
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 02:10
- Re: impact resistance, mmeron, 02:10
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), FrediFizzx, 02:10
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang, brian a m stuckless, 02:06
- Re: Search engines are not unfair, Dori, 02:05
- Re: Search engines are not unfair, Dori, 02:02
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 02:02
- Re: The Harmonic Representation of Particles, FrediFizzx, 01:57
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T), OsherD, 01:25
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Sam Wormley, 01:24
- Re: impact resistance, Turman, 01:03
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T), OsherD, 01:03
- Re: impact resistance, Turman, 00:53
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T), OsherD, 00:52
- Re: K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T), OsherD, 00:42
- Re: Search engines are not unfair, Sam Wormley, 00:22
- Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, The Sanity Inspector, 00:19
- Re: Search engines are not unfair, Dori, 00:02
November 10, 2005
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Industrial Revolution, 23:59
- Search engines are not unfair, Sam Wormley, 23:50
- No good deed goes unpunished., Jeff_Relf, 23:27
- Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, lifeform1, 22:51
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Llanzlan Klazmon, 22:45
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Captain Ranger McCoy, 22:35
- Re: Each only wins in the Short_Run, never the Long_Run., xxein, 22:07
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 22:06
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 22:04
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 22:00
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Nick, 21:55
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 21:48
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Nick, 21:44
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, stephen, 21:37
- K^(L+T+M)V^(2L+T)PI = L^L T^T M^M F^(L+T), OsherD, 21:34
- Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, Steven Gray, 21:32
- Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo) - Response to Gary Sokolich, Gary Sokolich, 21:26
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Bob Cain, 21:22
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 21:17
- Re: MICROSATELLITES; how small? How cheap?, Brad Guth, 21:10
- Re: YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, donstockbauer, 21:08
- New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon, 20:47
- Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 20:44
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, oxazoline, 20:41
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 20:21
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, tressure, 20:16
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, oxazoline, 20:11
- Re: MICROSATELLITES; how small? How cheap?, Brad Guth, 20:02
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 19:58
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, oxazoline, 19:51
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Eric Gisse, 19:39
- Re: tj spews more rubbish, T Wake, 19:08
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, john_ramsden, 19:07
- Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 19:01
- Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 18:56
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 18:48
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 18:46
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 18:32
- Re: tj is still insane, T Wake, 18:32
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 18:27
- Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 18:08
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Llanzlan Klazmon, 18:04
- Re: tj is still insane, tj Frazir, 18:02
- Re: World War II in the Pacific, mmeron, 17:44
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, David Wimp, 17:44
- Re: What would this look like?, mike3, 17:34
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, tadchem, 17:23
- Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 17:21
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Eugene Stefanovich, 17:08
- Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 16:50
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Old Man, 16:41
- Re: Transition of weights in distorted equilibrium plane, dedanoe, 16:13
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 16:03
- Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 15:53
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Androcles, 15:43
- Re: World War II in the Pacific, Timo Nieminen, 15:36
- minitaller, valeri, 15:36
- minitaller, valeri, 15:36
- Re: Knowledge Equation Logarithmic Analysis, OsherD, 15:26
- Re: Knowledge Equation Logarithmic Analysis, OsherD, 14:46
- Re: Knowledge Equation Logarithmic Analysis, OsherD, 14:26
- Knowledge Equation Logarithmic Analysis, OsherD, 14:21
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 14:01
- YOU TELL 'EM, IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, edconrad, 13:53
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, CWatters, 13:49
- Hammond jumps the shark, Re: killfile notice, pete, 13:33
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, tadchem, 13:24
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, bz, 13:21
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, stephen, 13:10
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Eugene Stefanovich, 13:08
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:52
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 12:42
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Steve Ralph, 12:40
- Re: Galilean referential?, Androcles, 12:30
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 12:30
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:18
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, tadchem, 11:42
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, John Black, 11:33
- Re: Photon-photon interactions, Mark Fergerson, 11:30
- Re: Help with quantum computing project, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:10
- Re: Galilean referential?, Puppet_Sock, 11:05
- Re: tj is still insane, T Wake, 11:01
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 10:57
- Re: Help with quantum computing project, Traveler, 10:56
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Androcles, 10:50
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 10:43
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 10:38
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:34
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:30
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 10:24
- Re: Stupid Design., pete, 10:16
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 10:12
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
- Re: Capillary siphon modeling, tadchem, 09:49
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Androcles, 09:39
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 09:33
- Re: tj is still insane, tj Frazir, 09:30
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 09:28
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Dr Photon, 09:23
- Capillary siphon modeling, Tao, 09:22
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 09:17
- Re: Help with quantum computing project, Androcles, 08:58
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 08:49
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 08:48
- Re: Stupid Design., Harry, 08:30
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 08:20
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, AllYou!, 07:59
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, AllYou!, 07:59
- Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas', jmfbahciv, 07:54
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 07:18
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Don1, 06:51
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 06:23
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 06:18
- Transition of weights in distorted equilibrium plane, dedanoe, 05:42
- Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 753 November 9, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Bob Cain, 05:15
- Re: electromagnetism, Dr Photon, 05:09
- Free web-based seminar on spectroscopy, hannahvfromdublin, 04:52
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Y.Porat, 04:41
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 04:02
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", PD, 03:53
- He-der THEORY (He-ALL-der) with RED-and-BLUE-shifted RAW DATA.!!, brian a m stuckless, 03:43
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang, brian a m stuckless, 03:43
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Ian Parker, 03:23
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 03:20
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 03:02
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, a_plutonium, 02:33
- Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, Nick, 02:29
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 02:20
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 02:16
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Eric Gisse, 02:10
- Re: electromagnetism, krishna, 01:41
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, Charles, 01:37
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 01:36
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, ytyourclothes, 01:22
- Re: Budiyono K = 1/M and M = K^2 Variations From Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 01:17
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, thothmes, 01:06
- Re: Anisotropic 3D space, Old Man, 01:04
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:52
- Re: What will happen?, Old Man, 00:44
- Re: Inertia never changes, RP, 00:31
- pls ignore, Tar Baby, 00:14
- Re: Inertia never changes, odin, 00:13
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:05
November 09, 2005
- Each only wins in the Short_Run, never the Long_Run., Jeff_Relf, 23:56
- Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, RP, 23:55
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Old Man, 23:47
- Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo) - Response to Gary Sokolich, Bob Cain, 23:28
- The Harmonic Representation of Particles, main_engineering, 23:26
- Re: Light structures, Ioannis, 23:20
- Re: Help with quantum computing project, Sam Wormley, 23:16
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 23:08
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 22:59
- Re: The zoomed out view is X_Rated., xxein, 22:57
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", TomGee, 22:56
- Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets, Sam Wormley, 22:55
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 22:52
- Re: It's a pity ain't it - Response to Gary Sokolich, Bob Cain, 22:40
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Eric Gisse, 22:28
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Eric Gisse, 22:24
- The zoomed out view is X_Rated., Jeff_Relf, 22:20
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 22:12
- Re: Infinity Problems in QM, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 22:12
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, newedana, 22:01
- Budiyono K = 1/M and M = K^2 Variations From Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 21:59
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, newedana, 21:43
- Re: Stupid Design., Gregory L. Hansen, 21:17
- Re: Galilean referential?, Androcles, 21:13
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 21:09
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, carlip-nospam, 20:54
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, p1an0, 20:44
- Help with quantum computing project, kenfitz3, 20:36
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 20:34
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, uuu, 19:54
- Re: Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, Henry Haapalainen, 19:51
- Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), thetruthteller, 19:46
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, David Wimp, 19:42
- Re: Light structures, Skywise, 19:31
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Eugene Stefanovich, 19:28
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Old Man, 19:11
- Re: Stupid Design., pete, 19:10
- Question about the Big Bang and the creation of the universe, John Black, 18:49
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, Paul E. Bennett, 18:39
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Llanzlan Klazmon, 18:32
- Low Enriched Nuclear Bombs, sidon20051, 18:12
- Re: tj is still insane, T Wake, 18:10
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 18:08
- Re: Feynman on video?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 18:00
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Don1, 17:56
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 17:55
- Re: Galilean referential?, Puppet_Sock, 17:32
- Re: Light structures, AES, 17:14
- Re: Beating the sub-wavelength limit, Timo Nieminen, 17:14
- Re: Attraction VS geometry, brian a m stuckless, 17:04
- Re: PROTON mass mp CODATA standard NEW SI GUESS iSS ..definition:, brian a m stuckless, 17:04
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Sam Wormley, 17:02
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 16:55
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Eric Gisse, 16:47
- Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, W. Watson, 16:44
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Eric Gisse, 16:42
- Re: Galilean referential?, Androcles, 16:42
- Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, W. Watson, 16:41
- Re: What is dark matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:27
- Re: Stupid Design., Gregory L. Hansen, 15:48
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:35
- Re: Inertia never changes, Don1, 15:21
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Happy Hippy, 15:17
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:02
- Re: Stupid Design., Dirk Van de moortel, 14:56
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, tadchem, 14:47
- Re: Anisotropic 3D space, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:44
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 14:39
- Re: Stupid Design., pete, 14:39
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Don1, 14:35
- Re: The End of Zombie Science, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:23
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Michael J. Strickland, 14:23
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, a_plutonium, 14:10
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Happy Hippy, 14:06
- Re: Kansas redefines science & Stupid design, hanson, 14:04
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:54
- Re: Galilean referential?, Puppet_Sock, 13:51
- Re: Stupid Design., Gregory L. Hansen, 13:41
- Re: Double slit experiment questions, Puppet_Sock, 13:40
- Re: free on line compressible flow book, Andy Resnick, 13:27
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 13:08
- Re: Stupid Design., MissSouth, 13:07
- Re: Beating the sub-wavelength limit, Andy Resnick, 13:04
- Re: Kansas redefines science & Stupid design, Jan Panteltje, 13:01
- Double slit experiment questions, David Wimp, 12:58
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:57
- Re: virtual photon ?, Y.Porat, 12:57
- Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, Eugene Stefanovich, 12:49
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, mmeron, 12:40
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Double-A, 12:37
- Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, Dr Photon, 12:35
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Sue..., 12:33
- Kansas redefines science & Stupid design, hanson, 12:25
- Re: Infinity Problems in QM, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 12:23
- Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, Eugene Stefanovich, 12:21
- Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, CWatters, 12:12
- Re: Inertia never changes, odin, 12:11
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, Androcles, 12:09
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Dr Photon, 12:04
- Re: Kansas redefines science, Helmut Wabnig, 12:00
- Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), Androcles, 11:49
- Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design, Helmut Wabnig, 11:49
- Re: Stupid Design., Helmut Wabnig, 11:39
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 753 November 9, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 11:37
- Re: Anisotropic 3D space, Androcles, 11:30
- Re: $$$$$make tons of cash EASY$$$$$, Matthew Lybanon, 11:26
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Schoenfeld, 11:20
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 11:12
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Ian Parker, 11:05
- Galilean referential?, dreed, 11:02
- Re: Stupid Design., Harry, 11:00
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 10:58
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 10:53
- Re: Stupid Design., John Christiansen, 10:51
- Re: Stupid Design., Ale, 10:46
- Re: Attraction VS geometry, brian a m stuckless, 10:37
- PROTON mass mp CODATA standard NEW SI GUESS iSS ..definition:, brian a m stuckless, 10:37
- Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, Dr Photon, 10:23
- Re: Stupid Design., Helmut Wabnig, 10:22
- Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Tom Roberts, 09:58
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Happy Hippy, 09:43
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Schoenfeld, 09:32
- Re: Stupid Design., Ale, 09:30
- Re: What will happen?, Randy Poe, 09:29
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:26
- Is Maxwell's demon still alive?, vector, 09:26
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 09:22
- Re: virtual photon ?, Greysky, 09:20
- Re: Infinity Problems in QM, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:16
- Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), tadchem, 09:10
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 09:05
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 08:58
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, tadchem, 08:53
- virtual photon ?, DARTH VADER, 08:48
- What will happen?, DARTH VADER, 08:44
- Re: Infinity Problems in QM, Autymn D. C., 08:39
- Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas', Autymn D. C., 08:37
- Re: Question about random number generation, Graham Jones, 08:31
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Androcles, 08:02
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Don1, 08:01
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, tadchem, 07:50
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, Ian Macmillan, 07:50
- Re: Stupid Design., Harry, 07:46
- Re: electromagnetism, Dr Photon, 07:43
- Re: Infinity Problems in QM, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 07:40
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 07:29
- Re: Infinity Problems in QM, tttpppggg, 07:21
- Anisotropic 3D space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 07:11
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Wizard of Odd, 07:10
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Wizard of Odd, 07:09
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 06:58
- Randomness is notional, not physical. Freedom is notional., Jeff_Relf, 06:46
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 06:43
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 06:40
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 06:25
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 06:16
- Kansas redefines science, Jan Panteltje, 05:58
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:56
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Lloyd Parker, 05:47
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 05:07
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, T Wake, 04:38
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:28
- Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, Ilja Schmelzer, 04:11
- Re: Infinity Problems in QM, Autymn D. C., 04:07
- Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), Bob Cain, 04:03
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 04:03
- Re: Stupid Design., Dirk Van de moortel, 03:54
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Y.Porat, 03:51
- Stupid Design., Helmut Wabnig, 03:45
- Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), CWatters, 03:42
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Bob Cain, 03:40
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Ian Parker, 03:39
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, CWatters, 03:37
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 03:32
- Re: electromagnetism, machiraju . chaitanya, 03:29
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 03:28
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 03:25
- Re: electromagnetism, krishna, 03:17
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, John Baez, 02:57
- Re: electromagnetism, FrediFizzx, 02:29
- Re: Light structures, Skywise, 02:27
- Singularities: What Hawking needed to say, Nick, 02:26
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:12
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Sue..., 01:29
- F = m^(c1) a^(c2) Overrides Newton's F = ma for m constant, OsherD, 01:22
- Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), Mark Martin, 01:10
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, p1an0, 01:07
- Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 4: px = ?, OsherD, 00:56
- Top ten ways you know it's time to put the keyboard down..., Tom Cuddihy, 00:46
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Sue..., 00:41
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 00:24
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, kuttu, 00:22
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:13
November 08, 2005
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 23:59
- tj's 2nd peddler attempt with Gold, hanson, 23:49
- Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, Nick, 23:42
- Re: MICROSATELLITES; how small? How cheap?, Brad Guth, 23:40
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 23:37
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 23:34
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Sam Wormley, 23:28
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 23:26
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 23:22
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 23:21
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, PD, 23:13
- Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 4: px = ?, OsherD, 23:05
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Llanzlan Klazmon, 23:02
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Llanzlan Klazmon, 22:53
- Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), Androcles, 22:52
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Nick, 22:51
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, p1an0, 22:40
- Re: Inertia never changes, Nick, 22:39
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Herman Trivilino, 22:30
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:28
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, mmeron, 22:18
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, operator jay, 22:07
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Nick, 22:04
- Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Eric Gisse, 21:55
- Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way, Sam Wormley, 21:38
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:31
- Re: Inertia never changes, Sam Wormley, 21:31
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:07
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, W. Watson, 20:34
- Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, Steven Gray, 20:34
- A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), iwicom, 20:27
- A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo), iwicom, 20:26
- Re: The End of Zombie Science, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:00
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 19:55
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 19:39
- Re: How much money do string theorists make?, magic math tricks, 19:25
- Re: electromagnetism, Old Man, 19:21
- Re: impact resistance, mmeron, 19:12
- Re: impact resistance, Ken Muldrew, 18:45
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:28
- The USENET Planet of the Apes (was: River of shit), markwh04, 18:20
- Re: World Holidays of 7Nov and 14Dec; Happy Plutonium Day, Attila the Bum, 18:14
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 18:08
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:05
- Re: impact resistance, mmeron, 17:59
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 17:57
- Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, CWatters, 17:45
- Re: impact resistance, CWatters, 17:39
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, Joseph Michael Bay, 17:38
- Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, Androcles, 17:35
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Proginoskes, 17:25
- Re: How much money do string theorists make?, Proginoskes, 17:18
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Randy Poe, 17:14
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 17:09
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Eric Gisse, 17:04
- Re: impact resistance, mmeron, 16:29
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 16:16
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 16:15
- Re: impact resistance, PD, 16:12
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Androcles, 16:07
- Re: impact resistance, mmeron, 16:01
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Double-A, 15:34
- Re: impact resistance, PD, 15:30
- Re: Minimum Travel Times to Other Parts of the Universe, donstockbauer, 15:27
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, markwh04, 15:24
- Re: Minimum Travel Times to Other Parts of the Universe, markwh04, 15:18
- Re: Question about random number generation, carkaci, 15:15
- Re: What are UFOs, markwh04, 15:11
- Re: impact resistance, mmeron, 15:09
- Re: Infinity Problems in QM, markwh04, 15:01
- TomGee and the Einstein Centennial, PD, 14:59
- Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 3: Time As Causation, OsherD, 14:57
- Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 3: Time As Causation, OsherD, 14:52
- Re: World Holidays of 7Nov and 14Dec; Happy Plutonium Day, Attila the Bum, 14:42
- Re: tj's 1st peddler attempt with Gold, T Wake, 14:02
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 14:02
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 13:59
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:54
- Re: World Holidays of 7Nov and 14Dec; Happy Plutonium Day, a_plutonium, 13:53
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 13:50
- Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, PD, 13:47
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, tadchem, 13:46
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, tadchem, 13:42
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 13:38
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, PD, 13:18
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 13:14
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, a_plutonium, 13:11
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, CWatters, 12:50
- Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, CWatters, 12:40
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", PD, 12:38
- Re: Feynman on video?, Brett, 12:31
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 12:18
- Re: impact resistance, CWatters, 12:18
- Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, mmeron, 12:10
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 12:04
- Re: impact resistance, PD, 12:01
- Re: Question about random number generation, Graham Jones, 11:46
- Re: tj's 1st peddler attempt with Gold, tj Frazir, 11:34
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, PD, 11:33
- Re: impact resistance, Turman, 11:25
- Re: How much money do string theorists make?, Randy Poe, 11:05
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 11:04
- Re: impact resistance, John Popelish, 11:00
- Re: How much money do string theorists make?, David Holland, 11:00
- Re: Infinity a Concept, David R Tribble, 10:58
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:58
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:54
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Mark Fergerson, 10:34
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 10:27
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Sue..., 10:27
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, T Wake, 10:26
- Re: impact resistance, Turman, 10:21
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, Mark Edwards, 10:20
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:14
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:06
- Re: Inertia never changes, Double-A, 10:06
- Re: impact resistance, Turman, 10:04
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 10:01
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:57
- Re: impact resistance, Turman, 09:54
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 09:46
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 09:23
- Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, tadchem, 09:20
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 09:11
- Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, tadchem, 09:06
- Question about random number generation, carkaci, 08:59
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 08:54
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 08:51
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Peter, 08:44
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 08:39
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 08:16
- Re: electromagnetism, Dr Photon, 08:06
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 07:50
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, donstockbauer, 07:50
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 07:45
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Greg Neill, 07:43
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 07:41
- Re: electromagnetism, Greg Neill, 07:33
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 07:33
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 07:31
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Schoenfeld, 07:15
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 07:09
- Re: Why is the speed of light the same for all observers? (Inertial..., Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 07:05
- Re: Inertia never changes, Don1, 07:05
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 07:02
- Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, The Ghost In The Machine, 07:00
- Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?, W. Watson, 06:51
- Re: Hurricanes can spawn tornadoes, jmfbahciv, 06:28
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Jan Panteltje, 06:27
- Re: MICROSATELLITES; how small? How cheap?, Rene Tschaggelar, 05:57
- Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball, john0714@xxxxxxx, 05:32
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 05:22
- electromagnetism, krishna, 04:56
- Re: How much money do string theorists make?, Han de Bruijn, 04:39
- Re: Inertia never changes, Double-A, 04:27
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:20
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:08
- Re: impact resistance, CWatters, 04:06
- the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot, a_plutonium, 03:59
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 03:55
- Re: impact resistance, Helmut Wabnig, 03:50
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 03:49
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", TomGee, 03:40
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Androcles, 03:34
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 03:27
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, Androcles, 03:25
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 03:24
- Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 2: Phase Interpretation, OsherD, 03:22
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Alien Diaper Rocket, 03:14
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Double-A, 03:11
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Starbles, 03:02
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 02:37
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 02:32
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Androcles, 02:25
- Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 2: Phase Interpretation, OsherD, 02:21
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 02:17
- Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 2: Phase Interpretation, OsherD, 02:10
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 02:01
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Clemens W, 01:58
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 01:55
- Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 01:54
- impact resistance, Turman, 01:48
- impact resistance, Turman, 01:47
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 01:26
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, David Canzi -- non-mailable, 01:25
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 01:23
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 01:02
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Sue..., 01:02
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, James "Kibo" Parry, 01:01
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 00:59
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light? Permittivity and Permeability Of matter's EM field, Peter, 00:51
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 00:50
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 00:45
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 00:37
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Sue..., 00:32
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Sue..., 00:13
- Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation, donstockbauer, 00:13
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, donstockbauer, 00:07
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 00:01
November 07, 2005
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 23:57
- Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 23:51
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Sue..., 23:45
- Re: Light is a DUAL wave, Sue..., 23:44
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light? Permittivity and Permeability Of matter's EM field, Nick, 23:42
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 23:39
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 23:37
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light? Permittivity and Permeability Of matter's EM field, Sue..., 23:37
- Light is a DUAL wave, Nick, 23:32
- Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Jim, 23:31
- Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation, OsherD, 23:30
- What is it about matter that slows light? Permittivity and Permeability Of matter's EM field, Nick, 23:25
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 23:23
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Sue..., 23:06
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 23:02
- Re: Consider the electron as a union of two halves!!, Autymn D. C., 23:01
- Re: Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Eric Gisse, 22:39
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 22:27
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, John Baez, 22:07
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 22:04
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 21:57
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:53
- Re: Warmer Seas, Wetter Air Make Harder Rains as Greenhouse Gases Build, The Ghost In The Machine, 21:48
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:42
- Waves growing to size and collapsing: Light and Probability Waves, Nick, 21:41
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:32
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:26
- Re: confusing page on Wien's displacement; also question between matter-energy and radiation, Autymn D. C., 21:22
- Reading for turbulent supefluid ether people, Timo Nieminen, 20:52
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 20:38
- Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Tice with a J, 20:18
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Androcles, 20:04
- Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 20:02
- Re: Infinity Problems in QM, Autymn D. C., 19:53
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Herman Trivilino, 19:52
- tj's 1st peddler attempt with Gold, hanson, 19:48
- Re: Feynman on video?, Tice with a J, 19:39
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 19:34
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 19:26
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 19:25
- Re: Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Henry Haapalainen, 19:24
- How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?, Nick, 19:18
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, T Wake, 19:14
- Mass is neither an intrinsic property, or an element, Don1, 19:08
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 18:55
- Re: Gravitational Waves, matt271829-news, 18:55
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 18:33
- Re: Lying fkasner strikes again: Grant Awarded for Solar Hydrogen Generation, hanson, 18:10
- tj's 4th peddler attempt on hanson, hanson, 18:05
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 18:02
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, jcon, 18:01
- Re: Lying fkasner strikes again: Grant Awarded for Solar Hydrogen Generation, platopes, 17:54
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 17:52
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, W. Watson, 17:51
- Re: tj's 3rd peddler attempt on hanson, T Wake, 17:49
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 17:46
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 17:37
- Re: tj's 3rd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 17:31
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 17:28
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 17:05
- Free web based seminar on spectroscopy, hannahvfromdublin, 17:04
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 16:36
- Re: Mass vs inertia, PD, 16:31
- Re: How much money do string theorists make?, Kack Moogle, 16:31
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Tice with a J, 15:42
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 15:40
- Re: Inertia never changes, Don1, 15:26
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Androcles, 15:19
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, John Black, 15:18
- Re: What happens when space expands?, David Wimp, 15:17
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., PD, 15:12
- Re: Feynman on video?, Dr Photon, 15:11
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 15:05
- Re: Mass vs inertia, PD, 14:52
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:47
- Re: Inertia never changes, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:39
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:39
- China to land on moon in 2017 and get helium 3 for power.., Jan Panteltje, 14:30
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 14:24
- Re: Inertia never changes, John Christiansen, 14:21
- Re: Inertia never changes, Paul Cardinale, 14:20
- Re: confusing page on Wien's displacement; also question between matter-energy and radiation, Jim Black, 14:18
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 14:18
- Re: Inertia never changes, 888, 14:10
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 14:09
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:07
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", PD, 14:00
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:55
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 13:50
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Tice with a J, 13:47
- Re: Inertia never changes, Sam Wormley, 13:46
- Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:40
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:35
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 13:34
- World Holidays of 7Nov and 14Dec; Happy Plutonium Day, a_plutonium, 13:27
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:20
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 13:16
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Tice with a J, 13:13
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 13:10
- Inertia never changes, Don1, 13:06
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 13:04
- Re: Infinity a Concept, zuhair, 12:58
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 12:57
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Tice with a J, 12:49
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Tice with a J, 12:48
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Richard Schultz, 12:46
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 12:39
- Re: 911 physics. War on terror fraud., CWatters, 12:33
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:28
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:11
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 12:09
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 12:03
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 12:02
- Re: Warmer Seas, Wetter Air Make Harder Rains as Greenhouse Gases Build, jimp, 11:55
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:38
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Rand Simberg, 11:29
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Orion, 11:25
- Hurricanes can spawn tornadoes, Sam Wormley, 11:21
- Warmer Seas, Wetter Air Make Harder Rains as Greenhouse Gases Build, Sam Wormley, 11:20
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC, jcon, 11:20
- Re: Gravitational Waves, PD, 11:14
- Re: What happens when space expands?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:14
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Androcles, 11:13
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, PD, 10:52
- Re: What happens when space expands?, Sam Wormley, 10:47
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 10:46
- Re: Mass vs inertia, PD, 10:45
- Re: Proca's Extended Maxwell Equations with magnetic monopoles?, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 10:39
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, David Thomson, 10:27
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 10:07
- Re: Gravitational Waves, bartoszszczesny@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:04
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 09:52
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 09:35
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:34
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Wizard of Odd, 09:33
- Re: Photon-photon interactions, mark . hagerman, 09:29
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Wizard of Odd, 09:29
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, vector, 09:17
- Re: Proca's Extended Maxwell Equations with magnetic monopoles?, vector, 09:14
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 09:10
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Peter T. Daniels, 09:06
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., jmfbahciv, 09:05
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:03
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:54
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Herman Trivilino, 08:50
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 08:48
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 08:45
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Herman Trivilino, 08:44
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:35
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:29
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 08:23
- Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?, Y.Porat, 08:18
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 07:32
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, AllYou!, 07:29
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 07:24
- Re: 911 physics. War on terror fraud., donstockbauer, 06:52
- E**2=m**2+p**2?, W. Watson, 06:32
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 06:31
- Proca's Extended Maxwell Equations with magnetic monopoles?, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 06:13
- Why are Glazier and Frazir so much alike ? Hmmm., Jeff_Relf, 06:06
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 06:02
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 05:57
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 07, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:42
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 05:26
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:10
- 911 physics. War on terror fraud., Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer, 05:06
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:02
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, p1an0, 04:44
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, p1an0, 04:37
- Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, T Wake, 04:23
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:23
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:18
- Re: On the LaserLune Data, brian a m stuckless, 04:11
- Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, Eric Gisse, 04:08
- November Caption, Null, 03:54
- Re: force, brian a m stuckless, 03:39
- New SI GUESS, iNTRiNSiC REST energy, eM ..frame-of-reference: 1. Equivalent iNTRiNSiC TEST REST mass, cavity (n) = mD / m1. 2. Energy, eK is the photo-electric effect ionization energy. 3. Let eM equal PROTON mass, mp ..to see 3 QUARK definitions. This is the General Universal EQUATiON of State System GUESS., brian a m stuckless, 03:32
- What happens when space expands?, David Wimp, 03:27
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Ian Parker, 03:27
- Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, Nick, 02:54
- confusing page on Wien's displacement; also question between matter-energy and radiation, Autymn D. C., 02:40
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 02:37
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:20
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:14
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:05
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 01:57
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:55
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:48
- Re: Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents, OsherD, 01:46
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:45
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Double-A, 01:43
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 01:37
- Re: Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents, OsherD, 01:29
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 01:22
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, John Baez, 01:09
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 01:04
- Re: Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents, OsherD, 01:01
- Re: Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents, OsherD, 00:49
- Re: Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents, donstockbauer, 00:37
- Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents, OsherD, 00:30
- Re: Re-aligning astronomical principles, brian a m stuckless, 00:22
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 00:22
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, p1an0, 00:18
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, mike3, 00:12
November 06, 2005
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 23:46
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 23:41
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 23:37
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 23:12
- Re: Naked Singularity Via Reissner-Nordstrom and Gibbons-Maeda-Garfinkle-Horowitz-Strominger, OsherD, 22:57
- Naked Singularity Via Reissner-Nordstrom and Gibbons-Maeda-Garfinkle-Horowitz-Strominger, OsherD, 22:50
- Re: Uncle Al found dead in suburban LA, Will Janoschka, 22:14
- Re: space probe query, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 22:05
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Dik T. Winter, 21:46
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, Paul Hovnanian P.E., 21:45
- Re: Infinity a Concept, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:34
- Re: space probe query, jambaugh, 21:25
- Re: Gravitational Waves, jambaugh, 21:22
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, donstockbauer, 21:20
- Feynman on video?, Brett, 21:16
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:15
- Re: Mass vs inertia, donstockbauer, 21:10
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:00
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 20:53
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Eric Gisse, 20:45
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 20:34
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:32
- Re: Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity, Autymn D. C., 20:32
- Re: Sailing on air, Autymn D. C., 20:30
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:11
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, donstockbauer, 19:53
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 19:53
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:45
- Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 4: N > 1, OsherD, 19:44
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 19:39
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 19:32
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge, OsherD, 19:26
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, Geoff Edwards, 19:17
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, The Ghost In The Machine, 18:48
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 18:47
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 18:47
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 18:25
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 18:25
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Autymn D. C., 18:23
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Pat Flannery, 18:20
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Autymn D. C., 18:19
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, hanson, 17:36
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, Jason Lang, 17:32
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Ian Parker, 16:55
- Re: Photon-photon interactions, Old Man, 16:48
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Dave Rusin, 16:42
- Re: Gravitational Waves, matt271829-news, 16:42
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Ian Parker, 16:37
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 16:23
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Hero . van . Jindelt, 16:16
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge, Androcles, 16:15
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Androcles, 16:14
- Re: Gravitational Waves, matt271829-news, 16:11
- Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, donstockbauer, 16:09
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, tadchem, 16:07
- Re: Gravitational Waves, jonathan, 16:06
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 16:05
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 15:50
- Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, DaWasa, 15:48
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 3: Postulates of Budiyono, OsherD, 15:48
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:43
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 3: Postulates of Budiyono, OsherD, 15:43
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 15:39
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 15:36
- Re: Photon-photon interactions, Mark Fergerson, 15:33
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 3: Postulates of Budiyono, OsherD, 15:32
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, Jim Nugent, 15:23
- Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, donstockbauer, 15:22
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 3: Postulates of Budiyono, OsherD, 15:20
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Mark Fergerson, 15:16
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 3: Postulates of Budiyono, donstockbauer, 15:16
- Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 3: Postulates of Budiyono, OsherD, 15:06
- Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, Old Man, 14:59
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Hero, 14:47
- Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, Jim O'Reilly, 14:44
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 14:34
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, T Wake, 14:29
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 14:28
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, David Wimp, 14:27
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 14:23
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 14:19
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 14:15
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, Tice with a J, 14:08
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 14:02
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Happy Hippy, 13:58
- Re: Photon-photon interactions, Brad Guth, 13:36
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details, OsherD, 13:09
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details, OsherD, 12:56
- Re: Gravitational Waves, donstockbauer, 12:38
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details, OsherD, 12:38
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Mark Martin, 12:37
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details, donstockbauer, 12:33
- Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details, OsherD, 12:30
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 12:21
- Re: Gravitational Waves, jonathan, 11:53
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 11:41
- Re: Hubble Prospects For Resources on The Moon, Androcles, 11:33
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 11:26
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 11:21
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:18
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 11:17
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Double-A, 11:16
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 11:07
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 11:05
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:59
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 10:54
- Re: Gravitational Waves, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:54
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:48
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 10:47
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 10:47
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 10:41
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Tom Roberts, 10:41
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 10:39
- tj's 3rd peddler attempt on hanson, hanson, 10:22
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 10:18
- Re: Gravitational Waves, bartoszszczesny@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:15
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:10
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:54
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 09:53
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 09:52
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:49
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:48
- Re: What is dark matter, Sam Wormley, 09:37
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 09:36
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 09:25
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 09:24
- Re: Reciprocal Real Numbers, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 09:23
- Re: Uncle Al found dead in suburban LA, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:17
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 09:17
- Freedom is notional. _Unmeasurables_, Jeff_Relf, 09:15
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, rangermccoy, 09:10
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 09:07
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 09:00
- Re: space probe query, Mark Martin, 09:00
- Re: What is dark matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:57
- Gravitational Waves, matt271829-news, 08:56
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Sam Wormley, 08:54
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 08:50
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Jan Panteltje, 08:49
- Re: The absolute aging of the twins, brian a m stuckless, 08:47
- space probe query, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 08:46
- Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Lee Rudolph, 08:43
- Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Robert Low, 08:38
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 08:37
- Re: dark matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:36
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Lloyd Parker, 08:36
- Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:27
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, PD, 08:24
- Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson, tj Frazir, 08:21
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 07:51
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Dirk Van de moortel, 07:40
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 07:28
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 07:28
- Re: Pioneer 10 looks like red shift, not blue, donstockbauer, 07:14
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 07:00
- Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Don1, 06:59
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, donstockbauer, 06:52
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, donstockbauer, 06:49
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Jan Panteltje, 06:47
- Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Steve Ralph, 06:45
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, donstockbauer, 06:42
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:42
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, donstockbauer, 06:37
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 06:35
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:19
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 06:13
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, T Wake, 06:09
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:04
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, T Wake, 06:04
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 06:00
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 05:53
- Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:37
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Ken S. Tucker, 05:33
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:33
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 05:28
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:13
- 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?, mike3, 04:30
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 04:28
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement, brian a m stuckless, 04:25
- Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, Y.Porat, 04:24
- Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, Y.Porat, 04:21
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:15
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:28
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge, OsherD, 03:27
- Re: Stephen Hawking's thoughts on God., Jeff_Relf, 03:17
- Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge, OsherD, 03:15
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, brian a m stuckless, 03:12
- Cauchy's monopole.!!, brian a m stuckless, 03:12
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Ross A. Finlayson, 03:08
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 03:07
- Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy, OsherD, 03:03
- Re: Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, Bilge, 02:59
- Re: Why is the speed of light the same for all observers? (Inertial..., Bilge, 02:52
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:44
- Re: Stephen Hawking's thoughts on God., payam79bb@xxxxxxxxx, 02:23
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 02:18
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 02:17
- Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge, OsherD, 01:58
- New Horizon pluto mission might investigate Pioneer 10 anomaly, franklinhu, 01:43
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:37
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 01:29
- Photon-photon interactions, mark . hagerman, 01:26
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:19
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 00:46
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Happy Hippy, 00:18
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 00:17
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 00:17
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 00:09
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, Happy Hippy, 00:07
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 00:02
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
November 05, 2005
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 23:55
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 23:50
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 23:37
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 23:32
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 23:29
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 23:20
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 23:16
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 23:03
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 23:02
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 22:55
- Re: Is this quantity an "action"?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 22:44
- Re: Light and the inflationary epoch, Eric Gisse, 22:38
- Re: What is dark matter, Orion, 22:38
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 22:34
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 22:33
- Light and the inflationary epoch, Nick, 22:31
- Re: Hubble Prospects For Resources on The Moon, Mike, 22:29
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 22:29
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 22:26
- Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Proginoskes, 22:25
- Is this quantity an "action"?, junoexpress, 22:24
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, john_ramsden, 22:08
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 22:06
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:59
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Happy Hippy, 21:57
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:52
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 21:49
- Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, Orion, 21:36
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 21:14
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 21:03
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Autymn D. C., 21:01
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, The Ghost In The Machine, 21:00
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Autymn D. C., 20:59
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Autymn D. C., 20:57
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 20:42
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 20:40
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 20:38
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 20:23
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 20:20
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Dik T. Winter, 20:14
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 20:08
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 20:03
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, The Ghost In The Machine, 20:00
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 19:53
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., brodix, 19:51
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., brodix, 19:50
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, pete, 19:46
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:46
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 19:41
- Re: Question: about relation between particle exchange symmetry and angular momentum, Old Man, 19:34
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., brodix, 19:32
- Re: Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, xxein, 19:28
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:23
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:14
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Lee Rudolph, 19:13
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 19:06
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 19:04
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 18:55
- Re: Hubble Prospects For Resources on The Moon, Androcles, 18:54
- Re: What is dark matter, Sam Wormley, 18:52
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 18:48
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 18:26
- Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy, macromitch, 18:24
- Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science, shuba, 18:24
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., macromitch, 18:23
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Old Man, 18:18
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 18:18
- Re: What is dark matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:13
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:11
- Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy 2: Knowledge vs Mass, OsherD, 18:04
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 17:58
- Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy 2: Knowledge vs Mass, OsherD, 17:54
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 17:39
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:35
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Old Man, 17:34
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 17:30
- Re: killfile notice ha Hanson, T Wake, 17:27
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:24
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, Androcles, 17:20
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:18
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Happy Hippy, 17:09
- Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Sam Wormley, 17:09
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 16:50
- Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science, StpNrrs, 16:42
- The weight of a body's mass varies with location too, Don1, 16:34
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Jan Panteltje, 16:34
- Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science, StpNrrs, 16:31
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, Ken S. Tucker, 16:26
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., Dirk Van de moortel, 16:23
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:21
- Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy, OsherD, 16:21
- Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy, OsherD, 16:12
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., Androcles, 16:07
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
- Re: Light structures, Skywise, 15:59
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Ken S. Tucker, 15:58
- Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy, OsherD, 15:55
- Hubble Prospects For Resources on The Moon, Mike, 15:54
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 15:46
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, PiSigma, 15:44
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 15:19
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Hero . van . Jindelt, 15:17
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 15:17
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 15:14
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 15:11
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 15:00
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 14:56
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, donstockbauer, 14:48
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:42
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Al Zenner, 14:36
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx, 14:19
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx, 14:19
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, Charles, 14:15
- Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy, OsherD, 14:08
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 13:54
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:54
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 13:50
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 13:50
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 13:47
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., Dirk Van de moortel, 13:46
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 13:44
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:43
- Re: All Systems, hanson, 13:40
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 3: Solving for Knowledge, OsherD, 13:39
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 13:36
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 13:35
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Androcles, 13:35
- Re: Light structures, Ioannis, 13:32
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 3: Solving for Knowledge, OsherD, 13:30
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 13:25
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 13:24
- Re: Dirk, There is no math God., Greg Neill, 13:23
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 13:18
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 3: Solving for Knowledge, OsherD, 13:13
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 13:09
- Dirk, There is no math God., brodix, 13:05
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 13:04
- Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 3: Solving for Knowledge, OsherD, 13:03
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Jan Panteltje, 12:52
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 12:50
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 12:47
- Re: killfile notice ha Hanson, tj Frazir, 12:45
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 12:40
- Re: What is dark matter, hanson, 12:32
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:30
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Herman Trivilino, 12:26
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 12:24
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Ian Parker, 12:23
- Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, David Wimp, 12:20
- Re: Light structures, hanson, 12:10
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 12:06
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 12:04
- Re: Light structures, AES, 12:01
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 11:41
- Re: Getting Burned by Bad Science, Attila the Bum, 11:37
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 11:31
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, John Baez, 11:20
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Jan Panteltje, 11:16
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Ian Parker, 11:05
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Androcles, 10:59
- Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, Y.Porat, 10:57
- Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Jan Panteltje, 10:44
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 10:35
- Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, Sam Wormley, 10:30
- Question: about relation between particle exchange symmetry and angular momentum, dreameration, 10:26
- Does space flow out of galactic clusters?, David Wimp, 10:15
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:15
- Stephen Hawking's thoughts on God., Jeff_Relf, 10:06
- Re: What is dark matter, Sam Wormley, 09:58
- Climbing a Watery Slope, Sam Wormley, 09:53
- Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code, Sam Wormley, 09:40
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 09:37
- Re: All Systems, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:33
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, tadchem, 09:29
- Re: What is dark matter, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:12
- Re: Light structures, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:05
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 09:01
- Re: killfile notice ha Hanson, T Wake, 08:47
- Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up, T Wake, 08:46
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Greg Neill, 08:41
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Mike, 08:38
- Re: Mass vs inertia, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:37
- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 4 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 08:27
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Androcles, 08:27
- Einstein paper turns up on arXiv, Sam Wormley, 08:26
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Double-A, 07:57
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 07:38
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 07:37
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 07:30
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 07:28
- strange-hi fi sci., daksh, 07:07
- strange-hi fi sci., daksh, 07:07
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 07:00
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 06:52
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 06:48
- Re: Why is the speed of light the same for all observers? (Inertial..., Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 06:46
- Re: Hamilton: two mysteries solved, Lee Rudolph, 06:35
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 06:30
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., jmfbahciv, 06:22
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, kuttu, 06:19
- Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science, Androcles, 06:19
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, donstockbauer, 06:17
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, Androcles, 06:07
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, Androcles, 05:57
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, Androcles, 05:55
- Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, donstockbauer, 05:52
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, cutescience, 05:51
- Re: Light structures, donstockbauer, 05:42
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, donstockbauer, 05:36
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, kuttu, 05:14
- Re: Mystery of a Coin, CWatters, 05:12
- Re: Light structures, Scrim, 05:00
- Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, Charles, 04:45
- Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?, payam79bb@xxxxxxxxx, 04:19
- Re: Mass vs inertia, brian a m stuckless, 04:15
- Mystery of a Coin, kuttu, 04:13
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, blackboab, 04:11
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Steve O, 03:57
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 03:42
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", TomGee, 02:16
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, mmeron, 01:46
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, Allen L. Barker, 01:37
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations, OsherD, 01:34
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Y.Porat, 01:31
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations, OsherD, 01:17
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations, OsherD, 01:06
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations, OsherD, 00:54
- Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations, OsherD, 00:43
November 04, 2005
- Re: What is dark matter, tj Frazir, 23:28
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 23:15
- Re: killfile notice ha Hanson, tj Frazir, 23:04
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 22:50
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 22:34
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 22:29
- Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, Schoenfeld, 22:26
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 22:08
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 21:47
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Ken S. Tucker, 21:45
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 21:39
- Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 21:37
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 21:21
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Rand Simberg, 21:15
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 21:12
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 21:06
- Re: killfile notice, FakeName, 20:58
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 20:20
- Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science, TomGee, 20:17
- Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up, tj Frazir, 20:12
- Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, Eugene Stefanovich, 20:00
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Joe Pfeiffer, 19:59
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC, Eric Gisse, 19:44
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:39
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:33
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 19:31
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:27
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:19
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:14
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:08
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again, OsherD, 19:04
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 18:57
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 18:55
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC, OsherD, 18:50
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:40
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 18:25
- Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up, T Wake, 18:19
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 18:18
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:17
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Androcles, 18:04
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 17:50
- Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, shevek, 17:48
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 17:42
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:42
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC, jcon, 17:41
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:35
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, Ken S. Tucker, 17:29
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:28
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, tj Frazir, 17:22
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, macromitch, 17:21
- Re: Falling in curves, Ken S. Tucker, 17:21
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 17:19
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Sam Wormley, 17:15
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Old Man, 17:10
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, tj Frazir, 16:58
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC, OsherD, 16:56
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Old Man, 16:39
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 16:38
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 16:38
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 16:37
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again, OsherD, 16:35
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 16:33
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:32
- Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up, tj Frazir, 16:28
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunt..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:27
- Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up, tj Frazir, 16:27
- Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again, OsherD, 16:27
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 16:23
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 16:22
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 16:16
- Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again, OsherD, 16:10
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, PD, 16:00
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 15:54
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, donstockbauer, 15:53
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 15:47
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 15:44
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 15:44
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, blackboab, 15:44
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, donstockbauer, 15:40
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:37
- Re: Infinity a Concept, donstockbauer, 15:37
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 15:37
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 15:33
- Does Ur Coockk Hard Enough? ReUgWh, donstockbauer, 15:27
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 15:26
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 15:25
- Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, Sam Wormley, 15:23
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Cardinal Chunder, 15:17
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 15:13
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 15:07
- Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?, blackboab, 15:06
- Re: killfile notice, markwh04, 15:04
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, tadchem, 15:02
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 15:02
- Re: killfile notice, Randy Poe, 14:58
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 14:56
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 14:54
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:53
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 14:44
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 14:42
- Re: killfile notice, hanson, 14:27
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Randy Poe, 14:10
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:05
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:01
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, tadchem, 13:57
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Happy Hippy, 13:56
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Mike, 13:48
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:43
- Re: killfile notice, T Wake, 13:42
- Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up, T Wake, 13:42
- Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, tadchem, 13:40
- Re: CORRECTED energy e=mass*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*length/c^2; Where *length* CAN BE *UNiT* volume/surface area quotient, DiAMETER/6 for a SPHERE, EDGElength/6 for a CUBE and Tip-to-Tip DiSTANCE/6 for a TRiAKiS-icosahedral CORE CRYSTAL (20 lattice-unit cells)., Fred Stevens, 13:15
- Hamilton: two mysteries solved, John Baez, 13:13
- Re: Falling in curves, gwh, 13:12
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:11
- Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, Schoenfeld, 12:52
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, mmeron, 12:37
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:28
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:27
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Starlord, 12:26
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 12:23
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 12:20
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 12:09
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 12:06
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Mark Fergerson, 12:05
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Clemens W, 12:00
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Jan Panteltje, 11:52
- How to determine the scale of an arbitrary object., Lefty, 11:33
- Re: Bottlecap-tire pessure, Lefty, 11:29
- Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up, tj Frazir, 11:27
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 11:26
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:24
- Re: Cut medicade 35 bil give ol boss 70 bil same day fascim, tj Frazir, 11:23
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Jan Panteltje, 11:20
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, tj Frazir, 11:09
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", PD, 10:58
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, tj Frazir, 10:55
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jollyrogership, 10:51
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 10:38
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Starlord, 10:36
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 10:27
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Jan Panteltje, 10:23
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 10:11
- Re: River of shit, Samu Aalto, 10:04
- CORRECTED energy e=mass*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*length/c^2; Where *length* CAN BE *UNiT* volume/surface area quotient, DiAMETER/6 for a SPHERE, EDGElength/6 for a CUBE and Tip-to-Tip DiSTANCE/6 for a TRiAKiS-icosahedral CORE CRYSTAL (20 lattice-unit cells)., brian a m stuckless, 10:01
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 09:52
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Starlord, 09:51
- Re: emr vision / radio telescopes, Sam Wormley, 09:49
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 09:31
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 09:28
- emr vision / radio telescopes, Mike, 09:24
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 09:05
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Wizard of Odd, 09:00
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, PD, 08:59
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Wizard of Odd, 08:52
- Re: Infinity a Concept, pete, 08:47
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 08:31
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:23
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork Moon's First Restrant, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:20
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:19
- Re: Open for Guppy bait., AllYou!, 08:14
- Re: Open for Guppy bait., AllYou!, 08:13
- Re: Silicon chip puts the brakes on light, Jan Panteltje, 08:09
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, Allen L. Barker, 08:06
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 08:04
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:02
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 07:55
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, Allen L. Barker, 07:53
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 07:47
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 07:39
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 06:56
- Re: Infinity a Concept, donstockbauer, 06:43
- Re: Infinity a Concept, pete, 06:35
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, donstockbauer, 06:32
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 06:01
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:55
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:48
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:42
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:38
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Y.Porat, 05:16
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 04:48
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 04:45
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:44
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:37
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 04:28
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 04:16
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:15
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 04:04
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, mmeron, 03:44
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 03:39
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 03:31
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 03:21
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 03:19
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 03:17
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 03:05
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 02:47
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", TomGee, 02:45
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 02:41
- CORRECTiON: e=RESTmass*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*meter/c^2., brian a m stuckless, 02:39
- Re: Why is the speed of light the same for all observers? (Inertial..., brian a m stuckless, 02:39
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:38
- Re: BIG BANG, FrediFizzx, 02:36
- Re: Phase Changes Via Riccati To QM/QFT and Superluminal, OsherD, 02:28
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:16
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 02:14
- Re: Phase Changes Via Riccati To QM/QFT and Superluminal, OsherD, 02:10
- Re: Cut medicade 35 bil give ol boss 70 bil same day fascim, hanson, 01:58
- Re: Phase Changes Via Riccati To QM/QFT and Superluminal, OsherD, 01:57
- Phase Changes Via Riccati To QM/QFT and Superluminal, OsherD, 01:46
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:46
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 01:44
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, hanson, 01:27
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 01:15
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, mmeron, 01:10
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 01:07
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, Allen L. Barker, 00:55
- Re: BIG BANG, Happy Hippy, 00:54
- Re: Bottlecap-tire pessure, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:44
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:36
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:25
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:13
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Jim Black, 00:12
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 00:09
- Re: Bottlecap-tire pessure, Lefty, 00:03
November 03, 2005
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 23:58
- Synthetic Telepathy and NDE's., Raktizer Omheit, 23:57
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:44
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:41
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:22
- Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics, tj Frazir, 23:19
- Re: Bottlecap-tire pessure, donstockbauer, 23:10
- Re: Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, Eugene Stefanovich, 22:05
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:54
- Re: the behind closed doors fascim tricks, tj Frazir, 21:51
- Re: Cut medicade 35 bil give ol boss 70 bil same day fascim, tj Frazir, 21:48
- Re: the chopstick and fork can from china others used hands, tj Frazir, 21:36
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 21:34
- Re: Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, xxein, 21:30
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunt..., maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:22
- Re: How does one measure a mere perception ?, Jeff_Relf, 21:20
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 21:20
- Re: Some astro questions, LEFTY, 21:14
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 21:12
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", PD, 21:10
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:01
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 20:43
- Re: What does acceleration do to inertia?, macromitch, 20:40
- Re: Can you get out of a black hole?, macromitch, 20:35
- Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons, macromitch, 20:32
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, western1lands, 20:24
- Re: Lorentz contruction, EugeniuszW, 20:01
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 19:53
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 19:16
- Re: Can you get out of a black hole?, linear regression, 19:14
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 19:13
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 19:08
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Bill Hobba, 18:56
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 18:53
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunt..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:53
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 18:43
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, brodix, 18:42
- Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork, tj Frazir, 18:41
- Re: Can you get out of a black hole?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:40
- Re: Infinity a Concept, pete, 18:37
- Re: Infinity a Concept, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:34
- Re: killfile notice, tj Frazir, 18:31
- Re: You SHOW me the first tower hit vidio then, tj Frazir, 18:23
- Re: You SHOW me the first tower hit vidio then, tj Frazir, 18:22
- The articles with the most replies, in terms of lines, 5 levels deep., Jeff_Relf, 18:20
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, mmeron, 18:19
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 18:19
- Re: wake and hus dumb s knock lpe but wont disscuss it, tj Frazir, 18:14
- Lorentz construction, EugeniuszW, 18:10
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Virgil, 17:47
- Re: Can you get out of a black hole?, Al Zenner, 17:37
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", TomGee, 17:29
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", TomGee, 17:21
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", TomGee, 17:07
- Silicon chip puts the brakes on light, Sam Wormley, 16:55
- Ordinarily, every particle in quantum theory is neatly classified as either a boson or a fermion, Sam Wormley, 16:52
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 16:13
- Re: Frazir knows nothing, T Wake, 16:06
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 16:01
- Re: Frazir knows nothing, jimp, 15:49
- Re: Impossible, EugeniuszW, 15:42
- Re: Can you get out of a black hole?, Tice with a J, 15:38
- Re: Frazir knows nothing, T Wake, 15:36
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Old Man, 15:29
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Jim Black, 15:23
- Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?, Tice with a J, 15:22
- Re: easyer question wake and martin YOU, tj Frazir, 15:18
- Re: easyer question wake and martin YOU, tj Frazir, 15:18
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", donstockbauer, 15:01
- Following Up Sarfatti, OsherD, 14:59
- Re: Can you get out of a black hole?, Don1, 14:58
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", PD, 14:52
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 14:51
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx, 14:51
- Re: Infinity a Concept, pete, 14:50
- BOYLES law UNDER GRAVITATION, NILS BÖRJESSON, 14:48
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx, 14:48
- BOYLE law under GRVITATION, NILS BÖRJESSON, 14:47
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, Timo Nieminen, 14:30
- Re: Lagrangian, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:08
- Re: Quantum Mechanics calculations for an undergraduate?, carlip-nospam, 14:00
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:53
- Re: You SHOW me the first tower hit vidio then, T Wake, 13:51
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, ianparker2, 13:48
- Re: George_Hammond cant be too bad what about you, T Wake, 13:47
- Re: TJ FRAZIR is a moron, T Wake, 13:44
- Re: Thoughts on time and space, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:44
- Re: TJ FRAZIR is a PROVE IT, T Wake, 13:43
- Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas', Javier Bezos, 13:40
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", TomGee, 13:14
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Krztalizer, 13:02
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Puppet_Sock, 12:55
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:47
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, ianparker2, 12:45
- Re: Infinity a Concept, David R Tribble, 11:20
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, tadchem, 11:20
- Re: Quantum Mechanics calculations for an undergraduate?, Puppet_Sock, 11:10
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Puppet_Sock, 11:05
- Re: Fourier analysis Q, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:52
- Re: BIG BANG, tadchem, 10:46
- Fourier analysis Q, bill, 10:44
- Re: Quantum Mechanics calculations for an undergraduate?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:44
- Re: Dynamics equally insane with Kinetics, Puppet_Sock, 10:42
- Re: All Systems, Don1, 10:36
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:17
- Re: Some astro questions, LEFTY, 10:02
- Bottlecap-tire pessure, Greysky, 09:39
- Re: killfile notice, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:32
- Scientists Design Tiny Brake to Quicken Communications, Jan Panteltje, 09:29
- Re: Light must expand at creation: the light year long photon, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:15
- Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas', Juan R., 09:11
- Re: Light structures, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:07
- Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:00
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 08:56
- Quantum Mechanics calculations for an undergraduate?, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 08:54
- Re: Working Wrong Concepts, jmfbahciv, 08:45
- Re: All Systems, tadchem, 08:42
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 08:38
- Re: I give you my dynamic lever, tadchem, 08:37
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", PD, 08:35
- Re: Demolition