sci.physics (date)
October 31, 2005
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Cardinal Chunder, 12:00
- Careers in Physics, EnderLocke, 11:19
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, Tush Smells Bush Kills!!!!!!!!!!!, 11:18
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", PD, 11:12
- free on line compressible flow book, potto, 11:11
- Re: Gravitons, Y.Porat, 11:02
- Re: Gravitons, Y.Porat, 10:53
- Re: "The Nature of Mass", Sam Wormley, 10:46
- How much money do string theorists make?, markdemers15, 10:40
- Re: Tidal forces, Richard Herring, 10:35
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Bilge, 10:35
- "The Nature of Mass", Sthgir, 10:32
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, zod, 10:22
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, Datone, 10:13
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Mark Martin, 10:12
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, Brad Guth, 10:12
- Re: Some astro questions, PD, 10:11
- Re: Some astro questions, PD, 10:06
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 10:05
- Re: Gravitons, Mark Martin, 09:58
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Wizard of Odd, 09:57
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, Brad Guth, 09:53
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 09:52
- Re: Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, Sam Wormley, 09:45
- Re: Neutron Lifetime Sets Time for Atom Formation at Big Bang, Bilge, 09:39
- Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism, RM, 09:38
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Wizard of Odd, 09:35
- Gravitons, wgilmour, 09:24
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:23
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Mark Martin, 09:17
- Re: Hydrogen Production, Front Office, 09:12
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 09:10
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 09:07
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 09:07
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Mark Martin, 09:06
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, Orion, 09:06
- Re: Mass vector, Richard Herring, 09:03
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:57
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Mark Martin, 08:57
- Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas', Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 08:51
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 08:45
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 08:44
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 08:42
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Wizard of Odd, 08:41
- Re: atmosphere saturation of mixed liquids, Richard, 08:40
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 08:38
- Re: Infinity a Concept, surrealistic-dream, 08:36
- Re: All Systems, Don1, 08:36
- atmosphere saturation of mixed liquids, b_whittle, 08:32
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 08:27
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 08:25
- Re: Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA under a curve, *exactly*.!!, Justin O. Wyss-Gallifent, 08:13
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Bill Hobba, 08:11
- Re: Infinity a Concept, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:03
- Re: Mass vector, jmfbahciv, 07:57
- Re: Mass vector, jmfbahciv, 07:54
- Re: Some astro questions, Greg Neill, 07:53
- Re: guitar harmonics, Jan Panteltje, 07:38
- Re: Infinity a Concept, AllYou!, 07:21
- Re: Mass vector, Richard Herring, 07:21
- Re: guitar harmonics, Greg G, 07:17
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Peter Kinane, 07:01
- Re: All Systems, Don1, 06:56
- Re: All Systems, Don1, 06:49
- Re: What Ghost matrin wake get water rocketed, Mark Martin, 06:49
- Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas', Juan R., 06:43
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Juan R., 06:33
- Re: Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA under a curve, *exactly*.!!, donstockbauer, 06:03
- Re: Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA under a curve, *exactly*.!!, Starbles, 05:42
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, October 31, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:40
- Re: Falling in curves, Ken S. Tucker, 05:37
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Ken S. Tucker, 05:34
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Y.Porat, 05:21
- Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA under a curve, *exactly*.!!, brian a m stuckless, 05:16
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Bob Cain, 04:30
- Acceleration = direction, or (velocity-magnitude) / duration, change., brian a m stuckless, 04:14
- Re: Planck out of bag.!! HUP UP Tivity POSiTiON A PLANCK UNcertainty., brian a m stuckless, 04:14
- Re: What's involved in lights creation?, Sue..., 03:54
- Re: Riccati Equation Generalized For Universe Influencing Intersections, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 03:46
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 03:45
- Re: Falling in curves, Robert Low, 03:44
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:41
- Re: Riccati Equation Generalized For Universe Influencing Intersections, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 03:40
- Re: What would this look like?, axolotl, 03:35
- Re: Riccati Equation Generalized For Universe Influencing Intersections, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 03:33
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:22
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:15
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, macromitch, 02:43
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Schoenfeld, 02:43
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Schoenfeld, 02:34
- Feynmann's *virtual particle* NEGATiVE-COUNTs, duh.!!, brian a m stuckless, 02:28
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", brian a m stuckless, 02:28
- Re: Riccati Equation Generalized For Universe Influencing Intersections, OsherD, 02:16
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, macromitch, 01:59
- Re: Riccati Equation Generalized For Universe Influencing Intersections, OsherD, 01:45
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:39
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, macromitch, 01:38
- Hypothetical Questions Regarding the Inner Ear and Heat, Radium, 01:35
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:32
- Re: How does a passing black hole affect the event horizon and contents of another?, dean, 01:30
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 01:27
- Re: Falling in curves, ande452, 01:25
- Re: Falling in curves, ande452, 01:23
- Re: How does a passing black hole affect the event horizon and contents of another?, macromitch, 01:22
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, macromitch, 01:18
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, macromitch, 01:15
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, macromitch, 01:12
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, OsherD, 01:12
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Eric Gisse, 01:12
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, macromitch, 01:09
- Re: Some astro questions, macromitch, 01:02
- Re: Riccati Equation Generalized For Universe Influencing Intersections, OsherD, 00:39
- Re: Does the Levitron Globe Spin?, qquito, 00:29
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, mmeron, 00:27
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Bilge, 00:26
- Re: tj Frazir's legend of the LPE, hanson, 00:25
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich, 00:24
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Bob Cain, 00:21
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, Sue..., 00:14
- Riccati Equation Generalized For Universe Influencing Intersections, OsherD, 00:14
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, macromitch, 00:08
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 00:07
- Physical significance of the temperature kT = 1, cdsvan, 00:06
- How does a passing black hole affect the event horizon and contents of another?, deanbrown3d, 00:03
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, macromitch, 00:02
- Re: What Ghost matrin wake get water rocketed, tj Frazir, 00:01
October 30, 2005
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 23:57
- Re: What would this look like?, tj Frazir, 23:55
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Eric Gisse, 23:51
- What's involved in lights creation?, Nick, 23:51
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Timo Nieminen, 23:43
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, glbrad01, 23:39
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, OsherD, 23:37
- Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Al Zenner, 23:18
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, OsherD, 23:15
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Happy Hippy, 23:02
- Re: What would this look like?, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, newedana, 22:50
- Re: Falling in curves, Nick, 22:47
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 22:44
- Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?, Nick, 22:43
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, Mark Martin, 22:43
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Happy Hippy, 22:43
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Bill Hobba, 22:41
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, Nick, 22:05
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 22:04
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, tj Frazir, 22:03
- Re: cog, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 22:00
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, tj Frazir, 21:58
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:54
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, Nick, 21:44
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Nick, 21:40
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:38
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Eric Gisse, 21:15
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, Nick, 21:11
- What would this look like?, mike3, 21:07
- Re: guitar harmonics, FrediFizzx, 20:56
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 20:55
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, donstockbauer, 20:55
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Nick, 20:54
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 20:50
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, Nick, 20:45
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Jeff Root, 20:33
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, glbrad01, 20:21
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 20:21
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:03
- Re: guitar harmonics, Steve Latham, 19:59
- Re: Don't call black holes Black, Mark Martin, 19:52
- Re: What Ghost matrin wake get water rocketed, tj Frazir, 19:51
- Don't call black holes Black, Nick, 19:44
- Re: guitar harmonics, Dave K, 19:37
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, T Wake, 19:37
- Re: What Ghost matrin wake avoid LPE math, hanson, 19:35
- Re: Frazir is a moron, T Wake, 19:35
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 19:29
- Re: guitar harmonics, Steve Latham, 19:28
- Re: guitar harmonics, ¤ Alias, 19:24
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, Mark Martin, 19:23
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:23
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:21
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:13
- Re: GRAVITY AND THE PHOTON, tj Frazir, 19:11
- Re: guitar harmonics, Dave K, 19:07
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, mmeron, 19:04
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Bill Hobba, 19:00
- Re: guitar harmonics, ¤ Alias, 18:58
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Starbles, 18:57
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, tj Frazir, 18:47
- Re: Hydrogen Production, Old Man, 18:46
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:43
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, Jerry Avins, 18:42
- Re: guitar harmonics, Dave K, 18:37
- Re: GRAVITY AND THE PHOTON, Orion, 18:36
- Re: guitar harmonics, Steve Latham, 18:28
- Re: What Ghost matrin wake avoid LPE math, tj Frazir, 18:26
- Re: Light's Inflation - The Growth of Light, Nick, 18:16
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, glbrad01, 18:10
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Nick, 18:09
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 18:01
- Re: guitar harmonics, ¤ Alias, 17:58
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:55
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Ken S. Tucker, 17:45
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Eric Gisse, 17:40
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, robert bristow-johnson, 17:39
- Re: Some astro questions, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:28
- Re: guitar harmonics, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:27
- Re: guitar harmonics, Old Man, 17:23
- Re: Falling in curves, Androcles, 17:17
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Henry Haapalainen, 17:16
- Re: guitar harmonics, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:09
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Brad Guth, 17:06
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, donstockbauer, 17:04
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Brad Guth, 17:00
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 17:00
- Re: Tidal forces, Old Man, 16:59
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Timo Nieminen, 16:56
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Brad Guth, 16:53
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 16:53
- Hydrogen Production, Front Office, 16:48
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, mmeron, 16:45
- Re: Frazir is a moron, T Wake, 16:44
- Re: Frazir is a moron, T Wake, 16:44
- Re: Frazir is a moron, T Wake, 16:43
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 16:40
- Re: Some astro questions, donstockbauer, 16:39
- Re: Some astro questions, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 16:29
- Re: Falling in curves, Robert Low, 16:29
- Re: guitar harmonics, ¤ Alias, 16:13
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Nick, 16:13
- Re: Falling in curves, tensor, 16:07
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, OsherD, 16:04
- Re: guitar harmonics, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:00
- Re: guitar harmonics, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:58
- Re: Falling in curves, Nick, 15:56
- Re: Mass vector, Tom Roberts, 15:55
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 15:55
- Re: guitar harmonics, Steve Latham, 15:53
- Re: Falling in curves, Tom Roberts, 15:48
- Re: Falling in curves, tensor, 15:37
- Re: Planck out of bag.!! HUP UP Tivity POSiTiON A PLANCK UNcertainty., hanson, 15:36
- Re: guitar harmonics, Old Man, 15:34
- Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, OsherD, 15:33
- Re: Some astro questions, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:31
- Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence, OsherD, 15:24
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Timo Nieminen, 15:22
- Re: GRAVITY AND THE PHOTON, Brad Guth, 15:18
- Re: Planck out of bag.!! HUP UP Tivity POSiTiON A PLANCK UNcertainty., Dirk Van de moortel, 15:16
- Re: Falling in curves, tensor, 15:16
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, StpNrrs, 15:06
- Re: Falling in curves, Robert Low, 15:02
- Re: Planck out of bag.!! HUP UP Tivity POSiTiON A PLANCK UNcertainty., dearcilla, 15:00
- Re: Falling in curves, d389dndf934jr9, 14:47
- Re: Falling in curves, d389dndf934jr9, 14:46
- Re: Falling in curves, d389dndf934jr9, 14:41
- Re: starshop video, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:40
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, mmeron, 14:34
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, Ken S. Tucker, 14:32
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, StpNrrs, 14:31
- Re: Falling in curves, Robert Low, 14:28
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Y.Porat, 14:14
- Re: Falling in curves, Robert Low, 14:13
- Re: What Ghost matrin wake avoid LPE math, hanson, 14:12
- Re: Mass vector, Mike, 14:02
- Re: Falling in curves, Robert Low, 13:47
- Re: GRAVITY AND THE PHOTON, Brad Guth, 13:36
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx, 13:21
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx, 13:20
- Re: Falling in curves, Robert Low, 13:17
- Re: guitar harmonics, Dave K, 13:13
- Re: GRAVITY AND THE PHOTON, Brad Guth, 13:11
- Re: guitar harmonics, lancelotti13, 13:00
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 12:52
- guitar harmonics, lancelotti13, 12:45
- Re: Some astro questions, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:44
- starshop video, Sam Wormley, 12:32
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Tom Roberts, 12:29
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Happy Hippy, 12:24
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Y.Porat, 12:13
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Orion, 11:37
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Orion, 11:36
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, rangermccoy, 11:35
- Re: What Ghost matrin wake avoid LPE math, tj Frazir, 11:33
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, Bryan Hackney, 11:29
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 11:18
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Y.Porat, 11:05
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Tom Roberts, 11:02
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin, tj Frazir, 10:32
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Sam Wormley, 10:29
- "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Steehs, 10:26
- "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Steehs, 10:24
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Al Zenner, 10:15
- Re: Falling in curves, Tom Roberts, 10:02
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 09:58
- Re: Some astro questions, Greg Neill, 09:51
- Re: Infinity a Concept, AllYou!, 09:38
- Re: Infinity a Concept, AllYou!, 09:37
- Re: Some astro questions, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 09:32
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin, Greg Neill, 09:24
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin, Mark Martin, 09:17
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin, Mark Martin, 09:03
- Re: Some astro questions, Greg Neill, 08:08
- Re: Light's Inflation - The Growth of Light, Androcles, 08:01
- Re: Androcles don't burn the "vee"tches!..., Androcles, 07:55
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, T Wake, 07:38
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, T Wake, 07:37
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, T Wake, 07:37
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin, T Wake, 07:36
- Re: Mass vector, jmfbahciv, 07:36
- Re: Mass vector, jmfbahciv, 07:05
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, steve sulis, 06:59
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Y.Porat, 06:20
- Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, donstockbauer, 06:17
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 05:39
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, mmeron, 04:35
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Eric Gisse, 04:33
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 03:51
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 03:42
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 03:41
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 03:22
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 03:17
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, OsherD, 02:48
- Re: Ask-a-Friend Marketplaces, OsherD, 02:34
- Re: Fuel cells, Jimmy, 02:30
- Re: Some astro questions, Nick, 02:21
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Y.Porat, 01:48
- Light's Inflation - The Growth of Light, Nick, 01:32
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Y.Porat, 01:32
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Schoenfeld, 01:06
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Eric Gisse, 01:05
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Christopher Parker, 01:04
- Re: "There's got to be something behind all that energy." Albert Einstein, Christopher Parker, 01:00
- Re: Give up Black Holes, Christopher Parker, 01:56
- tj Frazir's legend of the LPE, hanson, 01:42
- Re: Japan developing remote control for humans, hanson, 01:42
- Re: Androcles don't burn the "vee"tches!..., hanson, 01:42
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Eric Gisse, 01:37
- Re: Some astro questions, Greg Neill, 00:55
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Michael Gray, 00:53
- Re: Some astro questions, Greg Neill, 00:47
- Re: P{(A U B)-->AB} = 1/2 Gives Astonishing Result, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:36
- Re: Telepathy: Do the Most Creative Physicists/Mathematicians Have It?, Lefty, 00:21
- Re: Telepathy: Do the Most Creative Physicists/Mathematicians Have It?, Lefty, 00:18
October 29, 2005
- Re: Telepathy: Do the Most Creative Physicists/Mathematicians Have It?, Lefty, 23:39
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 23:33
- Re: Fuel cells, tj Frazir, 23:30
- Ask-a-Friend Marketplaces, Sam Wormley, 23:26
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Schoenfeld, 23:24
- Re: free online free compressible textbook, hhc314, 23:13
- Re: Falling in curves, hhc314, 23:11
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin, tj Frazir, 23:10
- Falling in curves, Nick, 23:07
- Re: Androcles don't burn the "vee"tches!..., Androcles, 23:05
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Schoenfeld, 22:54
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 22:49
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 22:44
- Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Sam Wormley, 22:43
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, robert bristow-johnson, 22:38
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin, tj Frazir, 22:22
- Androcles don't burn the "vee"tches!..., hanson, 22:21
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 22:10
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 22:00
- Re: IAM circumcising the foreskins of your hearts.!!, donstockbauer, 21:53
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 21:18
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", TomGee, 21:07
- Re: Some astro questions, Boris Mohar, 20:58
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", hanson, 20:49
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 20:42
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, StpNrrs, 20:34
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, robert bristow-johnson, 20:02
- Re: cog, Boris Mohar, 19:58
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 19:55
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:43
- Re: Some astro questions, Greg Neill, 19:41
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Ken S. Tucker, 19:36
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", TomGee, 19:31
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Henry Haapalainen, 19:29
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin, Mark Martin, 19:04
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted his ass, tj Frazir, 19:03
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, Orion, 19:01
- Re: Tidal forces, The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
- Re: Fuel cells, The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 19:00
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, robert bristow-johnson, 18:58
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Ken S. Tucker, 18:57
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Mark Martin, 18:56
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, Ken S. Tucker, 18:49
- Re: the computational neurophysics of perception, robert bristow-johnson, 18:46
- Re: The metric system, Jeremy Boden, 18:40
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Eric Gisse, 18:37
- Re: Some astro questions, Lady Chatterly, 18:36
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Eric Gisse, 18:36
- Re: Unbound particles and energy?, Henry Haapalainen, 18:33
- the computational neurophysics of perception, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:32
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Jim Black, 18:28
- Re: Some astro questions, Greg Neill, 18:27
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin, tj Frazir, 18:26
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:17
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 18:15
- Re: Some astro questions, Greg Neill, 18:03
- Re: IAM circumcising the foreskins of your hearts.!!, HLS, 17:56
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 17:35
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 17:34
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, Neil W, 17:25
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 17:10
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 17:00
- Re: P{(A U B)-->AB} = 1/2 Gives Astonishing Result, OsherD, 17:00
- Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity, Orion, 16:35
- Re: Some astro questions, Greg Neill, 16:34
- Re: Some astro questions, Greg Neill, 16:29
- Re: Explanation of Anti Matter (Strange Experience: Meeting My Anti-Self), Autymn D. C., 16:07
- Re: P{(A U B)-->AB} = 1/2 Gives Astonishing Result, OsherD, 16:04
- Re: Tidal forces, The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
- Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity, The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
- Re: P{(A U B)-->AB} = 1/2 Gives Astonishing Result, OsherD, 15:59
- Re: Tidal forces, Al Zenner, 15:56
- Re: Some astro questions, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:49
- P{(A U B)-->AB} = 1/2 Gives Astonishing Result, OsherD, 15:44
- Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity, Robert Karl Stonjek, 15:40
- Re: Tidal forces, Androcles, 15:20
- Re: Electricity, magnetism and hypercubes, Ken S. Tucker, 15:13
- Re: Fuel cells, jimp, 15:08
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 15:04
- Re: Fuel cells, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
- Re: Some astro questions, Androcles, 14:56
- test, maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:55
- Re: missile launch, CWatters, 14:48
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 14:47
- Re: Perplexing Toy Problem, junoexpress, 14:33
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx, 14:32
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx, 14:23
- Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity, Orion, 14:12
- Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", platopes, 13:38
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Cardinal Chunder, 13:37
- Re: Fuel cells, Androcles, 13:34
- Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Orion, 13:27
- Re: Some astro questions, Greg Neill, 13:20
- cog, fresh~horses, 13:19
- Re: Perplexing Toy Problem, junoexpress, 13:14
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, OsherD, 13:09
- Re: Tidal forces, Greg Neill, 13:06
- "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Steehs, 12:59
- Re: Some astro questions, Lefty, 12:51
- Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity, Orion, 12:47
- Re: Runaway Universe Equation and Theorem, OsherD, 12:35
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 12:18
- Re: Runaway Universe Equation and Theorem, OsherD, 12:18
- Re: Runaway Universe Equation and Theorem, donstockbauer, 12:13
- Re: Fuel cells, jimp, 12:09
- Re: Runaway Universe Equation and Theorem, OsherD, 12:09
- PhysicsWiki - Contributors Needed, Advanced Physics Forums, 12:04
- Re: Why go solar?, jimp, 12:00
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Tom Roberts, 11:58
- Planck out of bag.!! HUP UP Tivity POSiTiON A PLANCK UNcertainty., brian a m stuckless, 11:35
- Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, john_ramsden, 11:33
- Runaway Universe Equation and Theorem, OsherD, 11:31
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin, Mark Martin, 11:28
- Re: Some astro questions, Greg Neill, 11:18
- Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime, qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx, 11:17
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted his ass, Mark Martin, 11:08
- Re: Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases 4: Universe Independent/Dependent Equations, hanson, 11:04
- Tidal forces, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:04
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 10:57
- Re: Mass vector, Mike, 10:53
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Y.Porat, 10:51
- Re: Mass vector, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:48
- Re: Mass vector, Herman Trivilino, 10:38
- Re: Fuel cells, Steven Gray, 10:37
- Re: Why doesn't light go into the nucleus?, Dave K, 10:32
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 10:30
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Narasimham, 10:07
- Re: Orbits, energy, and escaping oh my! an interesting question about these things, Greg Neill, 09:52
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted his ass, tj Frazir, 09:51
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Greg Neill, 09:50
- Re: Fuel cells, Greg Neill, 09:46
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted his ass, tj Frazir, 09:45
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jem, 09:42
- Fuel cells, Jimmy, 09:38
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin, tj Frazir, 09:29
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Don Chiasson, 09:26
- Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity, Boris Mohar, 09:09
- Re: Does the Levitron Globe Spin?, Boris Mohar, 09:04
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Bob, 08:55
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 08:32
- Re: River of shit, donstockbauer, 08:30
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 08:24
- Re: River of shit, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 08:15
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 08:13
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Androcles, 08:11
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., glbrad01, 08:09
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., jmfbahciv, 07:49
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 07:46
- Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity, Orion, 07:37
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Bill Hobba, 07:33
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Bill Hobba, 07:32
- Re: Infinity a Concept, PD, 07:03
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 06:56
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, jmfbahciv, 06:54
- Re: Mass vector, Mike, 06:49
- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 28 October 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 06:29
- Re: THAT OBSCURE OBJECT OF DESIRE: NUCLEAR ENERGY, Jan Panteltje, 06:26
- Re: Why go solar?, habshi, 06:09
- Re: Why go solar?, habshi, 05:59
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Schoenfeld, 05:53
- Queen Elizabeth II ..POPE of the CHURCH of ENGLAND.!!, brian a m stuckless, 05:42
- Pioneer anomaly x disappears.!!, brian a m stuckless, 05:42
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Stan Barr, 05:40
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, Schoenfeld, 05:36
- Scattering light, Nick, 05:06
- Re: Zero or One Maximizes the Independent Influence Equation, 1/2 Minimzes It, OsherD, 04:53
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Y.Porat, 04:52
- Zero or One Maximizes the Independent Influence Equation, 1/2 Minimzes It, OsherD, 04:46
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 04:02
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:59
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Michael Gray, 03:58
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, June R Harton, 03:57
- THAT IAM circumcising the FORESKiNs of your hearts.!!, brian a m stuckless, 03:54
- THAT IAM circumcising the FORESKiNs of your hearts.!!, brian a m stuckless, 03:54
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Eric Gisse, 03:52
- Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases 4: Universe Independent/Dependent Equations, OsherD, 03:32
- Re: Experimental GR, Bilge, 03:16
- Re: Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases 3: Overweight, OsherD, 03:16
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Y.Porat, 03:15
- Re: Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases 3: Overweight, OsherD, 03:07
- Re: The einsteinhoax Hoax, eddie jw, 02:59
- Re: Infinity a Concept, Starbles, 02:56
- Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases 3: Overweight, OsherD, 02:54
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Brian, 02:40
- Re: Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases 2: HIV/AIDS, OsherD, 02:08
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Nick, 02:07
- Re: Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases 2: HIV/AIDS, OsherD, 02:05
- Re: Filled atomic shells?, Happy Hippy, 01:58
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., donstockbauer, 01:57
- Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance, donstockbauer, 01:52
- Re: Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases 2: HIV/AIDS, donstockbauer, 01:45
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Brian, 01:45
- Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases 2: HIV/AIDS, OsherD, 01:42
- Re: Titanium Batteries, John Decker, 01:39
- Re: Orbits, energy, and escaping oh my! an interesting question about these things, robison, 01:37
- Re: Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases?, donstockbauer, 01:36
- Re: Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases?, OsherD, 01:20
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Eric Gisse, 01:02
- Re: Unbound particles and energy?, Eric Gisse, 00:58
- Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance, fkasner, 00:56
- Re: Physics of Telepathy, Lefty, 00:33
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:33
- Re: Infinity a Concept, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:24
- Does the Levitron Globe Spin?, qquito, 00:18
October 28, 2005
- Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases?, OsherD, 23:45
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted his ass, tj Frazir, 22:59
- Re: Mass vector, mmeron, 22:47
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Nick, 22:42
- Re: Unbound particles and energy?, Nick, 22:38
- Re: Unbound particles and energy?, Nick, 22:35
- Re: Unbound particles and energy?, Mark Martin, 22:34
- Re: Unbound particles and energy?, Nick, 22:32
- Re: Independent-Dependent Phases 37: Bohr-Sommerfeld Lagrangian Submanifolds, OsherD, 22:22
- Re: Independent-Dependent Phases 37: Bohr-Sommerfeld Lagrangian Submanifolds, OsherD, 22:14
- Re: River of shit, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 22:05
- Re: What is the timerate inside a black hole?, donstockbauer, 22:04
- Re: River of shit, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 22:03
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted his ass, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: Japan developing remote control for humans, donstockbauer, 21:56
- Re: River of shit, raconte, 21:44
- Re: Unbound particles and energy?, xxein, 21:43
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted his ass, Mark Martin, 21:41
- Re: Unbound particles and energy?, Eric Gisse, 21:40
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Mark Martin, 21:37
- Re: Electricity, magnetism and hypercubes, bz, 21:34
- Beating the sub-wavelength limit, Sam Wormley, 21:28
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Nick, 21:23
- Re: A hole on the roof... [optics], Al Zenner, 21:21
- Re: Unbound particles and energy?, Nick, 21:17
- Re: What Ghost slipped and busted his ass, tj Frazir, 21:15
- Re: Unbound particles and energy?, xxein, 21:15
- Re: Falling into a black hole? Where's the gravity?, Tom Roberts, 21:05
- Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance, brian a m stuckless, 21:00
- Re: Japan developing remote control for humans, tj Frazir, 20:47
- Unbound particles and energy?, Nick, 20:39
- Re: Stumbling into Space (by Timothy Ferris), ed1ward2, 20:36
- http://www.beyond-science.com/, xexe, 20:29
- Re: A hole on the roof... [optics], Androcles, 20:09
- Re: uncle Al was back !!!, Androcles, 19:52
- Non-cognito Ergo Dumb!, Androcles, 19:46
- Re: Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is Not The Fourth Dimension, but a Phenomena The Arises Becuase The Fourth Dimension is Expanding Relative to The Three Spatial Dimensions, Bill Hobba, 19:32
- Re: Why go solar?, jimp, 19:30
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Steve O'Hara-Smith, 17:21
October 23, 2005
- Re: Nobel Prizes, Lefty, 12:51
- Re: Cracking the Code of Pre-Earthquake Signals, hanson, 12:21
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 12:02
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 12:00
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 11:56
- Re:Matin fartin wake cant do the math and play child games, tj Frazir, 11:53
- Re:Matin fartin wake cant do the math and play child games, tj Frazir, 11:53
- Re:Matin fartin wake cant do the math and play child games, tj Frazir, 11:53
- Re:Matin fartin wake cant do the math and play child games, tj Frazir, 11:53
- Re:Matin fartin wake cant do the math and play child games, tj Frazir, 11:53
- Re: T.J., Wake is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 11:51
- Re: T.J., Wake is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 11:51
- Re: T.J., Wake is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 11:51
- Re: T.J., Wake is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 11:51
- Re: T.J., Wake is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 11:50
- Re: River of shit, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:50
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, TomGee, 11:44
- Re: Cracking the Code of Pre-Earthquake Signals, paul v birke, 11:19
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 11:16
- Re: Cracking the Code of Pre-Earthquake Signals, hanson, 11:05
- Re: River of shit, hanson, 11:05
- Re: Quarter million dollars a year to just think, jimp, 11:04
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 10:51
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 10:49
- Re: Cracking the Code of Pre-Earthquake Signals, Mike, 10:48
- Re: River of shit, raconte, 10:23
- Re: Nobel Prizes, Androcles, 10:11
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, T Wake, 10:09
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, T Wake, 10:07
- "General Relativity Examined"</H2></B>, Hosp, 09:59
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 09:56
- Re: Nobel Prizes, AJW, 09:17
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 09:12
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 08:45
- Cracking the Code of Pre-Earthquake Signals, Mike, 08:36
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", surrealistic-dream, 08:31
- Re: Nobel Prizes, Androcles, 08:20
- Re: Nobel Prizes, Androcles, 08:02
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 07:52
- Re: Nobel Prizes, AJW, 07:43
- Nobel Prizes, AJW, 07:41
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, David C . Ullrich, 07:29
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 07:10
- where to study matter structure?, stefjnoskynov, 07:09
- Re: Article: Many happy returns, Earth, Androcles, 07:01
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 06:47
- Re: x/xxii Puns, nemo, 06:37
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 06:31
- Re: Physics and Philosophy, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:16
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 06:10
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 06:08
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 05:24
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, jmfbahciv, 05:22
- Re: Article: Gravitational Models and the Origin of the Universe, Robert Karl Stonjek, 05:10
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 05:02
- GR-buffoon Tom Roberts: GR-nothing ..not any GR-thing.!!, brian a m stuckless, 05:01
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, brian a m stuckless, 05:01
- Article: Many happy returns, Earth, Robert Karl Stonjek, 04:46
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 04:20
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 04:18
- Re: River of shit, Helmut Wabnig, 04:17
- Re: Volumes and Areas and the Riccati Differential Equation, OsherD, 03:46
- Re: River of shit, onehappymadman, 03:38
- Volumes and Areas and the Riccati Differential Equation, OsherD, 03:19
- Re: River of shit, mmeron, 02:52
- Re: River of shit, Quantum Mirror, 02:44
- Re: Physics Book, LinuxFreak, 02:18
- Re: River of shit, hanson, 02:17
- Re: Math Books, LinuxFreak, 02:17
- Re: T.J., Wake is ing coward pansi get the out, Bob Cain, 02:09
- Math Books, LinuxFreak, 02:05
- Re: River of shit, Richard Schultz, 01:53
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 29: Clifford Algebras, Spacetime Calculus, OsherD, 01:50
- Re: Unbound particles and energy, Autymn D. C., 01:44
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 29: Clifford Algebras, Spacetime Calculus, OsherD, 01:33
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, Tom Roberts, 01:24
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 01:09
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Charlie Springer, 00:56
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 00:35
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:31
October 22, 2005
- Re: Why doesn't light go into the nucleus?, Autymn D. C., 23:52
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", tdp1001, 23:48
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 23:45
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, John Baker, 23:42
- Re: T.J., Wake is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 23:13
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, tj Frazir, 22:58
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 22:37
- Re: light going faster than, uh, light, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Larry Huntley, 21:59
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:30
- Re: River of shit, Quantum Mirror, 21:28
- Re: Nobels Prizes not that noble, tj Frazir, 21:19
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 21:11
- Re: River of shit, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 21:01
- Re: Article: Gravitational Models and the Origin of the Universe, xxein, 21:01
- Re: River of shit, Quantum Mirror, 20:57
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 20:52
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 20:39
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 20:34
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 20:09
- Re: Crevice evaporation, David . Paterson, 20:08
- Re: Physics and Philosophy, MobyDikc, 20:07
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 29: Clifford Algebras, Spacetime Calculus, OsherD, 20:02
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 29: Clifford Algebras, Spacetime Calculus, OsherD, 19:55
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 29: Clifford Algebras, Spacetime Calculus, OsherD, 19:52
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:51
- Re: Crevice evaporation, David . Paterson, 19:50
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:21
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, T Wake, 19:12
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, T Wake, 19:11
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, T Wake, 19:09
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, T Wake, 19:08
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, T Wake, 19:07
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, T Wake, 19:06
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 19:04
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 29: Clifford Algebras, Spacetime Calculus, OsherD, 18:57
- Independent/Dependent Phases 29: Clifford Algebras, Spacetime Calculus, OsherD, 18:37
- Re: Physics Book, FrediFizzx, 18:37
- Re: Getting into the industry., FrediFizzx, 18:34
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, TomGee, 18:21
- Re: River of shit, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 18:17
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 18:13
- Re: Getting into the industry., jimp, 18:01
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 17:57
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Traveler, 17:57
- Article: Gravitational Models and the Origin of the Universe, Robert Karl Stonjek, 17:46
- Re: River of shit, mmeron, 17:33
- Re: Physics Book, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:23
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:06
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Patrick Scheible, 17:00
- Re: Brown Dwarfs ???, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:57
- Re: Getting into the industry., Gregory L. Hansen, 16:52
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:43
- Physics Book, LinuxFreak, 16:28
- Re: River of shit, Quantum Mirror, 16:24
- Re: River of shit, Attila the Bum, 16:20
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 16:18
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 16:13
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, mmeron, 16:08
- Re: Getting into the industry., FrediFizzx, 16:01
- Re: River of shit, mmeron, 15:57
- Re: Overkill?, Mark lman, 15:55
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 15:45
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, FrediFizzx, 15:25
- Re: Overkill?, Herman Trivilino, 15:04
- Re: River of shit, onehappymadman, 15:00
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Steve O'Hara-Smith, 14:57
- light going faster than, uh, light, onehappymadman, 14:56
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 14:27
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 14:17
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 13:54
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 13:47
- Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?, oriel36, 13:44
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 13:39
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 13:33
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 13:28
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 13:19
- Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?, Androcles, 13:14
- Re: Getting into the industry., jimp, 12:55
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 12:53
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Androcles, 12:50
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 12:49
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 12:43
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 12:42
- Re: River of shit, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 12:35
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 12:32
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 12:30
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, Mark Martin, 12:19
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Charlie Springer, 12:17
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Paul Stowe, 11:59
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Paul Stowe, 11:53
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 11:48
- Re: Overkill?, Don1, 11:46
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 11:33
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 11:27
- Getting into the industry., muaythaigold, 11:13
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 11:11
- Re: PD ..the "more fundamental" dimwit.!!, maporat, 11:01
- Re: Overkill?, Mark Martin, 10:48
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Dirk Van de moortel, 10:35
- Re: Physics and Philosophy, GSS, 10:35
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", tdp1001, 10:32
- PD ..the "more fundamental" dimwit.!!, brian a m stuckless, 10:31
- Re: River of shit, Thomas Johnson, 10:23
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", tdp1001, 10:20
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Juan R., 10:12
- "Is There a Force of Gravity?", Hosp, 10:07
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Juan R., 09:54
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 09:51
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Traveler, 09:26
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Juan R., 09:25
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Sue..., 09:23
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 09:22
- Slim and Sturdy Solar Cells: Nanocrystals offer path to electricity, Sam Wormley, 09:15
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Juan R., 08:45
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 08:19
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Juan R., 08:19
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Juan R., 08:13
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, John Baker, 08:07
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Juan R., 08:05
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", john_ramsden, 07:59
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Juan R., 07:47
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 07:46
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 07:44
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 07:31
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Dave, 07:17
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Michael Gray, 07:12
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Juan R., 07:05
- Re: Physics and Philosophy, PD, 07:05
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 07:05
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Juan R., 07:03
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 06:25
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 05:53
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", oriel36, 05:46
- Re: Physics and Philosophy, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:42
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 05:29
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 05:28
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 05:27
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., jmfbahciv, 05:19
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Dirk Van de moortel, 05:13
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Cardinal Chunder, 05:00
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Steve O'Hara-Smith, 04:45
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Ken S. Tucker, 04:28
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 03:49
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Fred J . McCall, 03:38
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bilge, 03:34
- Re: River of shit, Bob Cain, 03:24
- Heisenberg was NOT WRONG ..just because he GOT CAUGHT too OFTEN, "Trying to ((focus)) on BOTH ENDs of VELOCiTY vectors, at once!", brian a m stuckless, 03:17
- Really proper Dimwit.??!!, brian a m stuckless, 03:17
- Re: Really Big Bang??, brian a m stuckless, 03:17
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bilge, 03:02
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Fred J . McCall, 02:52
- Re: Overkill?, Virgil, 02:50
- Re: net force in simple lever - shame on newton, Helmut Wabnig, 02:34
- Re: Mass vs inertia, KeithK, 02:31
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Joe Pfeiffer, 02:21
- Re: River of shit, mmeron, 01:51
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", platopes, 01:40
- Re: VVF nomination: Re: Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), yyyiiinnnggg, 01:23
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Fred J . McCall, 01:16
- Re: VVF nomination: Re: Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), Pope Snarky Goodfella of the undulating cable, JM, CK, POEE, KOTHASK, EOTHP, 01:01
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 00:53
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 00:40
- Re: PHYSICS LETTERS PAPER ON SUBQUARKS (3 subquarks = 1 quark, possible?), adron, 00:31
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", blart, 00:22
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Charlie Springer, 00:20
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 00:11
- Re: Physics and Philosophy, platopes, 00:08
October 21, 2005
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 23:54
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 23:48
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, tj Frazir, 23:47
- Re: Variable directions of Light in a Gravitational Field, tj Frazir, 23:42
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 23:34
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 23:32
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", tj Frazir, 23:26
- Re: Quantum Dots Produce White Light --- Light Bulb's Successor, hanson, 23:23
- Re: PHYSICS LETTERS PAPER ON SUBQUARKS (3 subquarks = 1 quark, possible?), Jay R. Yablon, 23:09
- Re: Posting Web Site Previews of Upcoming Papars, Jay R. Yablon, 23:07
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, RP, 23:07
- Re: Posting Web Site Previews of Upcoming Papars, Jay R. Yablon, 23:05
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Fred J . McCall, 23:00
- AScribe Newswire: Quantum Dots That Produce White Light Could Be Light Bulb's Successor, Sam Wormley, 22:52
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., mmeron, 22:31
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", tdp1001, 22:12
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., surrealistic-dream, 22:05
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, Mark Martin, 21:53
- Re: Crevice evaporation, Mark Thorson, 21:50
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, Sue..., 21:43
- Re: For Any Mathematicians: 100 Yr Flood FEMA Statistics ?, tj Frazir, 21:15
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 21:08
- Re: What is it about matter that slows light?, Happy Hippy, 20:51
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Don Chiasson, 20:47
- Re: Overkill?, abe . buckingham, 20:42
- Re: Overkill?, Mark Martin, 20:37
- Re: River of shit, Happy Hippy, 20:23
- What is it about matter that slows light?, Nick, 20:18
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 20:13
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Don1, 20:07
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", nightlight, 19:54
- Crevice evaporation, David . Paterson, 19:46
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 19:41
- Re: River of shit, mmeron, 19:16
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Hank Oredson, 19:16
- Re: Brown Dwarfs ???, Sam Wormley, 18:52
- Re: River of shit, Jerry, 18:43
- Re: Everybody knows don't they?, androc1es, 18:40
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, hanson, 18:38
- Re: River of shit, Jerry, 18:34
- Re: Physics and Philosophy, donstockbauer, 18:24
- Re: Mass vs inertia, maghas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:20
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., David M. Palmer, 18:19
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, donstockbauer, 18:18
- Re: Everybody knows don't they?, maghas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:17
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., mmeron, 18:17
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, donstockbauer, 18:12
- Re: Physics and Philosophy, donstockbauer, 18:09
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken S. Tucker, 18:05
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Chris Menzel, 18:01
- net force in simple lever - shame on newton, dedanoe, 18:00
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 17:59
- Physics and Philosophy, MobyDikc, 17:56
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Fred J . McCall, 17:41
- Re: Brown Dwarfs ???, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:40
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken Muldrew, 17:30
- Re: Brown Dwarfs ???, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:23
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Joe Pfeiffer, 17:09
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, JMosey, 17:02
- Re: River of shit, Thomas Johnson, 17:02
- Re: River of shit, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:56
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 16:39
- Re: Overkill?, Don1, 16:28
- Re: River of shit, Thomas Johnson, 16:17
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", FrediFizzx, 16:08
- Re: River of shit, hanson, 16:08
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 21 Oct 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 15:49
- Re: First life on Earth was full organism; Cancer = Virus theory, mmeron, 15:46
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Ken S. Tucker, 15:46
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 15:37
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 15:33
- Re: River of shit, mmeron, 15:31
- Re: River of shit, mmeron, 15:24
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 15:18
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 15:16
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, george, 15:16
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 15:08
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, ianparker2, 15:06
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, tadchem, 15:00
- Re: Mass vs inertia, Sam Wormley, 14:57
- Re: Mass vs inertia, donstockbauer, 14:56
- Mass vs inertia, Don1, 14:53
- Re: River of shit, markwh04, 14:52
- Re: River of shit, John Bailey, 14:47
- Re: Overkill?, markwh04, 14:45
- Re: Overkill?, Mark Martin, 14:37
- Re: Everybody knows don't they?, donstockbauer, 14:31
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, JMosey, 14:27
- Re: Overkill?, Don1, 14:24
- Re: Everybody knows don't they?, Don1, 14:06
- Re: Brown Dwarfs ???, marika, 14:05
- Re: Everybody knows don't they?, Don1, 14:04
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 14:03
- Re: Could we use endothermic(heat absorbing) reactions to reduce hurricane strength?, rgregoryclark, 13:56
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken Muldrew, 13:54
- EINSTEIN-GR VS MODERN-GR, NILS BÖRJESSON, 13:52
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 13:51
- EINSTEIN-GR VS MODERN-GR, NILS BÖRJESSON, 13:25
- Re: Overkill?, Mark Martin, 12:45
- Re: First life on Earth was full organism; Cancer = Virus theory, tadchem, 12:42
- Re: Overkill?, tadchem, 12:37
- Re: Overkill?, PD, 12:11
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Traveler, 12:04
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 11:48
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", hanson, 11:42
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Mike Combs, 11:28
- Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Mark Martin, 11:27
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 11:17
- Re: River of shit, Richard J Kinch, 11:14
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 11:08
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Chris Menzel, 10:51
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 10:40
- Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics", Sam Wormley, 10:29
- "The Error in Relativistic Physics", Hosp, 10:23
- Re: River of shit, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:21
- Re: VVF nomination: Re: Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), Daedalus, 10:16
- Physicists have observed the Jahn-Teller effect in a molecule, Sam Wormley, 10:12
- Re: Everybody knows don't they?, Ryugyong Hotel, 10:10
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", p . kinsler, 10:08
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 10:05
- Re: VVF nomination: Re: Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), The Demon of Mockery, 10:05
- Ask the Wizard! [Re: VVF nomination: Re: Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), Daedalus, 10:03
- Re: Emission VS absorption band for CO2 near 4.3 microns, Androcles, 10:02
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 10:00
- Re: River of shit, Androcles, 09:55
- Re: River of shit, tdp1001, 09:50
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 09:45
- Re: Everybody knows don't they?, Androcles, 09:44
- Emission VS absorption band for CO2 near 4.3 microns, PlanckQ, 09:44
- Re: VVF nomination: Re: Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), Wizard of Odd, 09:43
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 09:43
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 09:32
- Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena, Wizard of Odd, 09:29
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 09:24
- Re: Overkill?, abe . buckingham, 09:20
- Re: River of shit, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:17
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 09:16
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 09:09
- Re: Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), Wizard of Odd, 09:04
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", nightlight, 09:03
- Re: First life on Earth was full organism; Cancer = Virus theory, faginea, 09:02
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 08:51
- Overkill?, Don1, 08:43
- Re: VVF nomination: Re: Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), Wizard of Odd, 08:41
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 08:39
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 08:38
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Daryl McCullough, 08:37
- Everybody knows don't they?, Don1, 08:35
- Re: Looking for Internet Picture of the Green Glint of the Sun, clusardi2k, 08:34
- Re: Does exponential acceleration affect measurement of light speed?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 08:31
- SERIOUS OUTBREAK OF TESTICALIOSIS, Ed Conrad, 08:27
- Re: T.J is ing coward pansi get the out, T Wake, 08:21
- Re: T.J., Wake is ing coward pansi get the out, T Wake, 08:20
- Re: Looking for Internet Pictures of What Living Things Actually See (That Use Non-Visual Bands), clusardi2k, 08:20
- Re: Mass vs Matter, briggs, 07:55
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", donstockbauer, 07:46
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 07:45
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 07:39
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Traveler, 07:04
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Traveler, 06:58
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Don1, 06:51
- Re: IS THE BBC ALLOWED TO ENTER ZIMBABWE?, donstockbauer, 06:51
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, donstockbauer, 06:49
- IS THE BBC ALLOWED TO ENTER ZIMBABWE?, gloopencrotum, 06:44
- Re: River of shit, Jerry, 06:42
- Re: Brown Dwarfs ???, donstockbauer, 06:24
- Re: Brown Dwarfs ???, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:11
- Re: River of shit, Jerry, 05:59
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 05:22
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 04:52
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Harry, 04:51
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 04:44
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 04:42
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", brian a m stuckless, 04:33
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, Helmut Wabnig, 04:02
- Re: River of shit, Richard Schultz, 03:35
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, FrediFizzx, 02:45
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", FrediFizzx, 02:33
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., platopes, 02:27
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", platopes, 02:08
- Re: River of shit, mmeron, 01:49
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:49
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 01:38
- Re: River of shit, Thomas Johnson, 01:36
- New Warp Drive Paper 1, Jack Sarfatti, 01:32
- Re: 150 ready-to-run calculations, Ryugyong Hotel, 01:29
- Re: River of shit, Jerry, 01:23
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Nam Nguyen, 01:23
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", platopes, 01:18
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Ilja Schmelzer, 01:17
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Charlie Springer, 01:05
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", platopes, 01:02
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 00:55
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 00:49
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", platopes, 00:45
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", baez, 00:45
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", John Baez, 00:19
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 00:18
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 00:11
- Re: River of shit, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 00:10
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 00:07
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 00:04
October 20, 2005
- Re: energy derived from differential specific gravities?, Autymn D. C., 23:55
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Daryl McCullough, 23:39
- ANOTHER OUTBREAK OF TESTACALIOSIS.., Ed Conrad, 23:01
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 22:59
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Hank Oredson, 22:51
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., donstockbauer, 22:51
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Nam Nguyen, 22:49
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Autymn D. C., 22:47
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Kelly McDonald, 22:41
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Autymn D. C., 22:39
- Re: First life on Earth was full organism; Cancer = Virus theory, donstockbauer, 22:25
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 22:07
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 21:59
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 21:54
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 21:46
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 21:44
- Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?, andrewspencers, 21:14
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", Ben Rudiak-Gould, 20:51
- Re: River of shit, Thomas Johnson, 20:47
- Re: why fire moves upward, gloopencrotum, 20:36
- Re: T.J., Wake is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 20:33
- Re: River of shit, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:25
- Re: River of shit, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:22
- Re: Dark Matter -- One Mystery Solved (Update), John Sefton, 19:58
- Re: T.J., Wake is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 19:41
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 19:35
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 19:23
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, Androcles, 19:17
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", hanson, 19:12
- Re: For Any Mathematicians: 100 Yr Flood FEMA Statistics ?, mmeron, 19:02
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", platopes, 18:56
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 18:54
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 18:47
- Re: Poll: Math and Calculators (was: How to Fix Texas Instruments), mmeron, 18:38
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Jim Spriggs, 18:36
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 18:28
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Eugene Stefanovich, 18:18
- Re: Electrodynamics' problem--Earnshaw's theorem., Timo Nieminen, 18:16
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 18:07
- Re: First life on Earth was full organism; Cancer = Virus theory, hanson, 18:05
- Re: For Any Mathematicians: 100 Yr Flood FEMA Statistics ?, nightlight, 18:01
- Re: For Any Mathematicians: 100 Yr Flood FEMA Statistics ?, nightlight, 17:59
- Re: River of shit, hanson, 17:58
- Re: T.J., Wake is ing coward pansi get the out, T Wake, 17:52
- For Any Mathematicians: 100 Yr Flood FEMA Statistics ?, Robert11, 17:47
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", platopes, 17:34
- Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?, James Copeland, 17:29
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Sam Wormley, 17:26
- Dark Matter -- One Mystery Solved (Update), Sam Wormley, 17:16
- Re: Brown Dwarfs ???, Sam Wormley, 17:12
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:11
- Re: River of shit, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:09
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Pat Flannery, 17:05
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Patrick Scheible, 17:05
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 17:02
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:01
- Article: 'Axis of evil' warps cosmic background, Robert Karl Stonjek, 16:59
- Brown Dwarfs ???, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:53
- Re: First life on Earth was full organism; Cancer = Virus theory, brian a m stuckless, 16:51
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 16:48
- Electrodynamics' problem--Earnshaw's theorem., Harry, 16:45
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., shevek, 16:28
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, brian a m stuckless, 16:25
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Don1, 16:18
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", platopes, 16:10
- Re: Poll: Math and Calculators (was: How to Fix Texas Instruments), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 15:49
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Jim Spriggs, 15:40
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 15:39
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", platopes, 15:35
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, hanson, 15:32
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Traveler, 15:32
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 15:28
- First life on Earth was full organism; Cancer = Virus theory, a_plutonium, 15:25
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 15:24
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 15:21
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 15:21
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Robert Low, 15:19
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Andy Resnick, 15:18
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 15:16
- Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed, Andy Resnick, 15:12
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 15:11
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 15:10
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 15:07
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Daryl McCullough, 15:05
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 15:03
- Re: 150 ready-to-run calculations, Sam Wormley, 15:01
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 14:55
- Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed, FrediFizzx, 14:49
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", platopes, 14:49
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 14:48
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 14:45
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 14:43
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 14:42
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 14:41
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 14:36
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Chris Menzel, 14:35
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 14:26
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 14:22
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken Muldrew, 14:18
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 14:08
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken Muldrew, 14:03
- 150 ready-to-run calculations, calcmaster, 14:00
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 13:54
- Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed, Puppet_Sock, 13:54
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", FrediFizzx, 13:44
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Joe Pfeiffer, 13:31
- Re: River of shit, Attila the Bum, 13:31
- Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?, Randy Poe, 13:30
- Re: River of shit, Androcles, 13:28
- Is there Bell's Theorem?, nightlight, 13:25
- NASA Expands [Mars] Rover Science Team, Sam Wormley, 13:11
- Re: River of shit, Attila the Bum, 13:08
- Re: River of shit, Thomas Johnson, 12:51
- Re: River of shit, Attila the Bum, 12:45
- Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:43
- Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:42
- Re: Units of inertia, Don1, 12:40
- Re: why fire moves upward, gloopencrotum, 12:35
- Re: Kohlmann: Relf is not my problem, Peter Köhlmann, 12:33
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Greysky, 12:32
- Kohlmann: Relf is not my problem, John Bailo, 12:23
- Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?, andrewspencers, 12:21
- Re: Looking for Internet Pictures of What Living Things Actually See (That Use Non-Visual Bands), Dirk Van de moortel, 12:12
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, Androcles, 12:11
- Re: River of shit, Sheldon Harper, 12:06
- Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?, Androcles, 12:01
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, Barbara Schwarz, 11:59
- Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?, Androcles, 11:55
- Re: solartron manuals, where oh where?, Androcles, 11:44
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, Orion, 11:40
- Re: River of shit, Richard Schultz, 11:29
- Does exponential acceleration affect measurement of light speed?, andrewspencers, 11:23
- Studentships Available in Complex Agent Systems/Artificial Life/Bio-Inspired Robotics, Daniel Polani, 11:19
- Re: T.J., Wake is ing coward pansi get the out, tj Frazir, 11:09
- Re: "The Einstein Hoax", Sam Wormley, 10:54
- Re: "The Einstein Hoax", Sam Wormley, 10:53
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, John Bailey, 10:43
- "The Einstein Hoax", Orex, 10:43
- "The Einstein Hoax", Orex, 10:42
- Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed, tadchem, 10:41
- Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?, tadchem, 10:40
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, PD, 10:36
- Re: Archimedes Plutonium has been awarded an Honorary Doctor of Laws, Puppet_Sock, 10:21
- Looking for Internet Pictures of What Living Things Actually See (That Use Non-Visual Bands), clusardi2k, 10:17
- Re: Looking for Internet Picture of the Green Glint of the Sun, Happy Hippy, 10:14
- Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:04
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., jmfbahciv, 10:00
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 10:00
- How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?, andrewspencers, 09:57
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., jmfbahciv, 09:56
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 09:55
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 09:53
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 09:49
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:44
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., surrealistic-dream, 09:41
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 09:31
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, abo, 09:29
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 09:21
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, Andy Resnick, 09:18
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 09:17
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 09:17
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, abo, 09:13
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 09:00
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Dirk Van de moortel, 09:00
- Re: Birefringence, Andy Resnick, 08:45
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 08:40
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, jmfbahciv, 08:40
- Re: Looking for Internet Picture of the Green Glint of the Sun, Androcles, 08:40
- solartron manuals, where oh where?, Ancient_Hacker, 08:39
- Re: River of shit, john_ramsden, 08:25
- Re: Looking for Internet Picture of the Green Glint of the Sun, tadchem, 08:24
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 08:20
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, Orion, 08:19
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 08:17
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 08:15
- Re: why fire moves upward, tadchem, 08:11
- Looking for Internet Picture of the Green Glint of the Sun, clusardi2k, 08:06
- Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Jan Panteltje, 08:04
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 08:01
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 07:59
- Re: Electric Multipoles Beyond Octupoles?, tadchem, 07:45
- Re: Archimedes Plutonium has been awarded an Honorary Doctor of Laws, donstockbauer, 07:43
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 07:27
- Re: River of shit, Androcles, 07:26
- Re: River of shit, Androcles, 07:24
- Re: River of shit, Androcles, 07:23
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", donstockbauer, 07:17
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, Androcles, 07:13
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, donstockbauer, 07:08
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, Androcles, 07:05
- Re: TURN $6 INTO $15,000 IN ONLY 30 DAYS...HERES HOW - "paypal.rtf" 12.4 KBytes , Androcles, 06:59
- Re: The Purpose of Inflation, donstockbauer, 06:55
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, David C . Ullrich, 06:50
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 06:50
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, David C . Ullrich, 06:47
- Re: The Purpose of Inflation, Bilge, 06:34
- Re: Units of inertia, John Christiansen, 06:27
- My own experience on "sci.physics.research", Juan R., 06:26
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", PD, 05:57
- Re: 120 MB broadband by airship, Jan Panteltje, 05:44
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Lloyd Parker, 05:23
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, Helmut Wabnig, 04:58
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", RP, 04:28
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, axolotl, 04:26
- Re: Birefringence, RP, 04:22
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 04:03
- Re: Birefringence, RP, 04:02
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Dirk Van de moortel, 04:02
- Re: Birefringence, Wonky, 03:54
- DrSquare, a nymshifting Brit in Romania., Jeff_Relf, 03:46
- Re: Birefringence, Wonky, 03:44
- I want the kids to have programming jobs too., Jeff_Relf, 03:35
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", RP, 03:32
- Re: Birefringence, CWatters, 03:24
- Maybe Bailo grieves about his lost youth, but I don't., Jeff_Relf, 03:15
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", CWatters, 03:04
- Re: Birefringence, RP, 03:01
- No lies were told... no lies could be told., Jeff_Relf, 02:59
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, MorituriMax, 02:43
- Birefringence, Wonky, 02:28
- Plain text, Usenet, is where it's at., Jeff_Relf, 02:23
- Re: Archimedes Plutonium has been awarded an Honorary Doctor of Laws, Ken S. Tucker, 02:18
- Archimedes Plutonium has been awarded an Honorary Doctor of Laws, Dr Hunter S Thompson, 02:08
- Re: TURN $6 INTO $15,000 IN ONLY 30 DAYS...HERES HOW - "paypal.rtf" 12.4 KBytes , hhc314, 02:08
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, FrediFizzx, 02:04
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Bob Cain, 01:53
- Re: why fire moves upward, gubernacullum, 01:50
- Re: River of shit, Richard Schultz, 01:40
- Re: River of shit, Richard Schultz, 01:37
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Charlie Springer, 01:21
- Re: Baryons as Third Rank Antisymmetric Tensors, Ken S. Tucker, 01:10
- Re: River of shit, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 01:06
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 00:57
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Keith Ramsay, 00:56
- Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed, Al Zenner, 00:49
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 00:46
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 28: Gravitation and Coulomb Via 1/2, OsherD, 00:46
- Re: The Purpose of Inflation, JimC, 00:36
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:30
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 28: Gravitation and Coulomb Via 1/2, OsherD, 00:29
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, Al Zenner, 00:22
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 00:21
- Re: quantum measurement, karan, 00:04
October 19, 2005
- Re: Units of inertia, KeithK, 23:58
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 23:56
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 23:43
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 23:41
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, hanson, 23:41
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, hanson, 23:41
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 23:36
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 23:17
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, cnctut, 23:07
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, PD, 23:06
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, mmeron, 23:00
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Paul Stowe, 22:58
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 22:49
- The performance of semiconductor devices can be improved by controlling..., Sam Wormley, 22:41
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 22:33
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., David M. Palmer, 22:32
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, donstockbauer, 22:21
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", PD, 22:19
- Re: Is physics a dead science?, donstockbauer, 22:11
- Is physics a dead science?, ubuu7, 22:06
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Don1, 21:46
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Gregory L. Hansen, 21:38
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 21:17
- Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed, donstockbauer, 21:15
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Chris Menzel, 21:08
- Re: River of shit, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:59
- Re: River of shit, Thomas Johnson, 20:38
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Androcles, 20:28
- Re: The Purpose of Inflation, Nick, 20:27
- Re: River of shit, Thomas Johnson, 20:27
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, Steven Gray, 20:21
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, Steven Gray, 20:19
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 20:17
- Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed, FrediFizzx, 20:14
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Jim Spriggs, 19:54
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", RP, 19:52
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 19:51
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Jim Spriggs, 19:50
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, cnctut, 19:37
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 19:32
- Re: Units of inertia, Don1, 19:29
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 19:20
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Dirk Van de moortel, 19:09
- Re: River of shit, Bruce Sinclair, 19:03
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, markwh04, 18:59
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", RP, 18:59
- Re: Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), dwickford, 18:37
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Sam Wormley, 17:58
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Don1, 17:50
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", platopes, 17:48
- Re: River of shit, john_ramsden, 17:46
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:43
- Re: Are quasars really at the large distances indicated by their redshifts?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:41
- Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again), Shiver My Timber, 17:39
- Re: What Physical Force REALLY IS, Peter Kinane, 17:29
- Re: If you only knew... you'd hate me even more., John Bailo, 17:28
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Jim Spriggs, 17:18
- Re: Units of inertia, KeithK, 17:18
- Re: Electric Multipoles Beyond Octupoles?, Autymn D. C., 17:16
- Re: Electric Multipoles Beyond Octupoles?, Autymn D. C., 17:15
- Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again), Shiver My Timber, 17:11
- Re: What are UFOs, donstockbauer, 17:08
- Re: What are UFOs, Mike Combs, 16:46
- Re: What Physical Force REALLY IS, Bill Hobba, 16:36
- Re: Maths Symbols in newsgroup, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:14
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 16:14
- (OT) Re: Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), Lynette, 16:02
- If you only knew... you'd hate me even more., Jeff_Relf, 16:01
- Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again), Timo Nieminen, 15:57
- Re: Just a millimeter, JimboCat, 15:51
- Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again), Timo Nieminen, 15:47
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Mark Martin, 15:47
- Re: What are UFOs, Lynette, 15:45
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 15:43
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 15:37
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 15:35
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 15:33
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, Androcles, 15:28
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 15:27
- quantum measurement, karan, 15:27
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, mmeron, 15:23
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 15:23
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 15:23
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Lynette, 15:17
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 15:15
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 15:15
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 27: Dyt vs Dtt Equation, OsherD, 15:11
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Dirk Van de moortel, 15:08
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Greysky, 15:05
- Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed, Andy Resnick, 15:02
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 14:56
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken Muldrew, 14:51
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Robert Low, 14:48
- Independent/Dependent Phases 27: Dyt vs Dtt Equation, OsherD, 14:45
- Re: Units of inertia, KeithK, 14:43
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, cnctut, 14:40
- Re: SO?, Ken S. Tucker, 14:28
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 14:28
- Re: Units of inertia, KeithK, 14:28
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Tom Roberts, 14:26
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, cnctut, 14:08
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", RP, 14:03
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 14:02
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 13:59
- Re:What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 13:58
- Re: Motion, PD, 13:54
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 13:53
- Re: Motion, stephen, 13:44
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 13:42
- Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed, john_ramsden, 13:40
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 13:21
- Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed, Puppet_Sock, 13:19
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, hanson, 13:17
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 13:13
- Re: SO?, Jay R. Yablon, 13:06
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Keith W, 13:00
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 12:58
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 12:56
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Robert Low, 12:51
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 12:51
- Re: Dimensional Analysis and Relativity, tadchem, 12:44
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Androcles, 12:39
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 12:29
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 12:28
- Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again), Androcles, 12:18
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Richard Herring, 12:16
- Re: VVF nomination: Re: Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), Daedalus, 12:06
- How to determine whether a system is open or closed, PD, 12:03
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Androcles, 11:59
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Androcles, 11:53
- Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again), Shiver My Timber, 11:51
- Re: SO?, Ken S. Tucker, 11:51
- Re: Protection from electromagnetic radiation, Dave, 11:50
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Andrew Swallow, 11:41
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:32
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Morten Reistad, 11:31
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 11:30
- VVF nomination: Re: Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), Cardinal Chunder, 11:25
- Re: What Physical Force REALLY IS, surrealistic-dream, 11:18
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., surrealistic-dream, 11:08
- Re: Dimensional Analysis and Relativity, Mark Martin, 11:02
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, jmfbahciv, 10:40
- Re: Dimensional Analysis and Relativity, Sam Wormley, 10:19
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Steve O'Hara-Smith, 10:12
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 10:07
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Don1, 10:05
- Dimensional Analysis and Relativity, Einsteinhoax, 10:02
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 09:54
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 09:54
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 09:48
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., cerberus, 09:47
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 09:47
- Re: 'Light', Justice International, 09:42
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 09:41
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 09:35
- Re: how do they know they've got only one proton, electron, etc?, PD, 09:27
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 09:25
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Helene . Boucher, 09:24
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 09:08
- Re: Mass vs Matter, briggs, 08:51
- Re: Units of inertia, Don1, 08:47
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Helene . Boucher, 08:44
- Re: 'Light', PD, 08:43
- Re: how do they know they've got only one proton, electron, etc?, tadchem, 08:39
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", RP, 08:38
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Mark Fergerson, 08:38
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 08:35
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 08:33
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, tadchem, 08:29
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 08:28
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Helene . Boucher, 08:24
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., jmfbahciv, 08:20
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, John C . Polasek, 08:18
- how do they know they've got only one proton, electron, etc?, Neil W, 08:16
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 08:12
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Androcles, 08:11
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 08:10
- Re: 'Light', Justice International, 08:08
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Helene . Boucher, 08:06
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 08:03
- Re: What Physical Force REALLY IS, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 08:01
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Helene . Boucher, 07:58
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, jmfbahciv, 07:54
- Re: Mass vs Matter, briggs, 07:53
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 07:41
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 07:41
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 07:39
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 07:39
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, john_ramsden, 07:37
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Helene . Boucher, 07:35
- Re: River of shit, Androcles, 07:34
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 07:27
- Re: River of shit, john_ramsden, 07:26
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 07:20
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 07:16
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Don1, 07:13
- Prediction: Russia-Chinese Alliance Invade Europe (Quantum Wormhole Created For Transfer of Data), Wizard of Odd, 07:12
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 07:09
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 07:05
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, David C . Ullrich, 06:50
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 06:34
- Re: 'Light', PD, 06:31
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 06:08
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Lee Rudolph, 06:07
- Re: River of shit, platopes, 05:56
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 05:55
- Re: River of shit, Helmut Wabnig, 05:49
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, Zinc Potterman, 05:47
- Maths Symbols in newsgroup, Zinc Potterman, 05:46
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., platopes, 05:42
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", platopes, 05:28
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 05:24
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Morten Reistad, 05:00
- Re: 'Light', Justice International, 04:48
- Re: news tonight from NOVA of more support for RSNM as forming solar systems, donstockbauer, 04:41
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, donstockbauer, 04:38
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Androcles, 04:37
- Re: River of shit, Happy Dog, 04:32
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Lloyd Parker, 04:31
- Re: Mass vs Matter, donstockbauer, 04:30
- Re: 'Light', PD, 04:30
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 04:28
- Re: River of shit, donstockbauer, 04:27
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 04:27
- Re: 'Light', Androcles, 04:26
- Re: 'Light', Androcles, 04:25
- Re: River of shit, platopes, 04:24
- Re: River of shit, Androcles, 04:14
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., platopes, 04:12
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Helene . Boucher, 04:10
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 04:10
- Re: 'Light', Justice International, 04:06
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Ilja Schmelzer, 04:00
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 04:00
- news tonight from NOVA of more support for RSNM as forming solar systems, a_plutonium, 03:58
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 03:54
- Re: River of shit, platopes, 03:53
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Ilja Schmelzer, 03:47
- Re: Units of inertia, platopes, 03:41
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Androcles, 03:36
- Re: River of shit, Helmut Wabnig, 03:32
- Re: The Purpose of Inflation, DarkD, 03:26
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, platopes, 03:25
- Re: River of shit, platopes, 03:24
- Re: River of shit, Helmut Wabnig, 03:21
- Re: What Physical Force REALLY IS, Josef Matz, 03:21
- Re: River of shit, Helmut Wabnig, 03:17
- Re: Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., makc . the . great, 03:17
- Re: River of shit, Helmut Wabnig, 03:16
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, MorituriMax, 03:16
- Re: River of shit, Helmut Wabnig, 03:15
- Re: Units of inertia, PD, 03:15
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Helmut Wabnig, 03:06
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, Helmut Wabnig, 03:04
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 03:01
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 03:01
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 03:00
- Re: Units of inertia, KeithK, 02:55
- Re: River of shit, platopes, 02:47
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Androcles, 02:41
- Re: 'Light', PD, 02:41
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", platopes, 02:33
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Michael Gray, 02:28
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", platopes, 02:27
- Re: River of shit, Richard Schultz, 02:13
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Robert Low, 02:11
- Re: River of shit, Richard Schultz, 02:11
- 'Light', Justice International, 02:09
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, PD, 01:55
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 01:53
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", PD, 01:35
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, abo, 01:21
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Ryugyong Hotel, 01:14
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Charlie Springer, 00:56
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, mmeron, 00:45
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 00:38
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 00:38
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 00:38
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 00:38
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Timo Nieminen, 00:14
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 00:06
October 18, 2005
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 23:44
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, John Park, 23:39
- Re: Entire Super Cosmos Multiverse Creates Itself, Autymn D. C., 23:38
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 23:30
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, John C . Polasek, 23:22
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, John C . Polasek, 23:13
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 23:07
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Sam Wormley, 23:05
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Sam Wormley, 23:02
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", platopes, 23:01
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, Llanzlan Klazmon, 22:52
- Re: Maps From the Riccati Equation to the Cartan Matrix, OsherD, 22:46
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 22:22
- Re: Conservation of energy, EugeniuszW, 22:19
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Paul Stowe, 22:16
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", jambaugh, 22:15
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Paul Stowe, 22:14
- Re: Entropy and the "big bang", Sam Wormley, 22:13
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, FrediFizzx, 22:01
- Re: Maps From the Riccati Equation to the Cartan Matrix, OsherD, 21:57
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Robert J. Kolker, 21:51
- Maps From the Riccati Equation to the Cartan Matrix, OsherD, 21:47
- Re: What are UFOs, Matt Giwer, 21:43
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:38
- FA: New Hamamatsu Position Sensitive PMT, Rich, 21:35
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Owen, 21:29
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Androcles, 21:18
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 21:15
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 20:45
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, mmeron, 20:25
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, Steven Gray, 20:16
- Re: Variable Speed of Light in a Gravitational Field, Lady Chatterly, 20:14
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 20:12
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, Timo Nieminen, 20:11
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Eric Gisse, 20:07
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 19:45
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, cnctut, 19:23
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 19:23
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", RP, 19:18
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, Sam Wormley, 19:05
- Re: Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Sam Wormley, 19:02
- Re: Homie don't play that., T Wake, 18:36
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 18:36
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 18:34
- Newton defined mass as the product of a body's density and its volume:, Don1, 18:28
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, John Park, 18:21
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Ken S. Tucker, 18:20
- Re: What Physical Force REALLY IS, Bill Hobba, 18:04
- Re: Are quasars really at the large distances indicated by their redshifts?, donstockbauer, 17:57
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 17:52
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 17:41
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, John Bailey, 17:37
- Re: The quantum of light; How does it condensate?, Sue..., 17:32
- Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere, Greg Neill, 17:13
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Kelli Halliburton, 17:10
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 16:49
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 16:37
- Gravitational potential inside a sphere, Zinc Potterman, 16:37
- Re: Russell Turpin's "Characterization of Quack Theories", OsherD, 16:36
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 16:28
- Re: Russell Turpin's "Characterization of Quack Theories", OsherD, 16:27
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 16:16
- Re: River of shit, FrediFizzx, 16:16
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 16:15
- Re: Physics' and Math's 0-1-2-3 in Psychology, Cryptography, and Social Sciences, OsherD, 16:10
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Androcles, 16:04
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Daryl McCullough, 16:03
- What Physical Force REALLY IS, rem460, 15:59
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, andrewspencers, 15:58
- Are quasars really at the large distances indicated by their redshifts?, Sam Wormley, 15:56
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Robert Low, 15:55
- Russell Turpin's "Characterization of Quack Theories", Sam Wormley, 15:54
- Physics' and Math's 0-1-2-3 in Psychology, Cryptography, and Social Sciences, OsherD, 15:53
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 15:52
- Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again), Timo Nieminen, 15:39
- Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again), Shiver My Timber, 15:35
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 15:29
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, andrewspencers, 15:27
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 15:22
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Ryugyong Hotel, 15:10
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 15:03
- Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Androcles, 15:01
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", donstockbauer, 15:00
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 14:57
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Dirk Van de moortel, 14:48
- Re: The quantum of light; How does it condensate?, Orion, 14:47
- OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?, Greysky, 14:22
- Re: Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., Douglas Eagleson, 14:03
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", platopes, 13:53
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken Muldrew, 13:52
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, abo, 13:38
- Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again), Tice with a J, 13:12
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Robert J. Kolker, 12:59
- Re: Does time exist ?, John C . Polasek, 12:44
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Robert Low, 12:42
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 12:19
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Daryl McCullough, 12:08
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 12:00
- nano-scale electromechanical switch, Sam Wormley, 12:00
- Re: River of shit, hanson, 11:52
- Re: River of shit, hanson, 11:52
- Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again), Shiver My Timber, 11:38
- Re: Mass vs Matter, maporat, 11:30
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", tdp1001, 11:25
- Re: Motion, PD, 11:25
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 750 October 19, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 11:20
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", CWatters, 11:10
- Re: Archimedes deathray...., Jan Panteltje, 11:10
- Re: Archimedses deathray...., Jan Panteltje, 11:04
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 10:59
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Cardinal Chunder, 10:49
- How to Learn Physics and Write Proofs, FSC729, 10:48
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Randy Poe, 10:38
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, abo, 10:31
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Sam Wormley, 10:28
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 10:28
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 10:27
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 10:19
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Androcles, 10:16
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 10:13
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 10:13
- Re: River of shit, Nomen Nescio, 10:10
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 10:09
- Re: "The Arrow of Time", Sam Wormley, 10:06
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 10:04
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 10:02
- Re: River of shit, Androcles, 09:57
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 09:49
- Distance vs Quadrance?, Norman Wildberger, 09:49
- Re: The Myth of Black Holes, Orion, 09:41
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 09:35
- "The Arrow of Time", Orex, 09:31
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 09:16
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, Traveler, 09:14
- Re: The Myth of Black Holes, BernardZ, 09:07
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 08:32
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 08:32
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, abo, 08:29
- Re: Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., makc . the . great, 08:26
- Re: Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., makc . the . great, 08:22
- Re: River of shit, MMu, 08:20
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 08:13
- Re: The quantum of light; How does it condensate?, Sue..., 08:04
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 08:03
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", The Ghost In The Machine, 08:00
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", The Ghost In The Machine, 08:00
- Re: Archimedes deathray...., The Ghost In The Machine, 08:00
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, andrewspencers, 07:53
- Re: River of shit, MMu, 07:50
- Re: River of shit, donstockbauer, 07:23
- Re: River of shit, donstockbauer, 07:21
- Re: River of shit, jmfbahciv, 07:11
- Re: Archimedses deathray...., donstockbauer, 07:00
- Re: Units of inertia, donstockbauer, 06:57
- Re: Just a millimeter, donstockbauer, 06:53
- Re: Units of inertia, Don1, 06:53
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 06:31
- Re: Movement in an independent frame of reference, which is made out of light, Hero . van . Jindelt, 06:28
- Archimedses deathray...., Jan Panteltje, 06:25
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 06:14
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 06:05
- Re: Electric Multipoles Beyond Octupoles?, Josef Matz, 06:04
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 05:49
- Re: River of shit, john_ramsden, 05:42
- Re: River of shit, Ian Macmillan, 05:24
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 05:17
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, mountain man, 05:07
- Re: River of shit, Androcles, 04:56
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Richard Herring, 04:52
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:52
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Robert Low, 04:49
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Bilge, 04:37
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Hero . van . Jindelt, 04:35
- Re: The Purpose of Inflation, Bilge, 04:27
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 04:12
- Re: River of shit, platopes, 04:02
- Re: The Myth of Black Holes, Bilge, 04:02
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Mike, 03:56
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Ilja Schmelzer, 03:53
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 03:52
- Re: Rotational motion of planets, CWatters, 03:51
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", platopes, 03:49
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., platopes, 03:43
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", CWatters, 03:31
- Re: What are UFOs, elson, 03:23
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", platopes, 03:17
- Thanks To Baez on Cartan Matrices, OsherD, 03:08
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Nick, 03:07
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Nick, 03:05
- Re: Updated Baryon Materials, Ken S. Tucker, 03:04
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bilge, 02:44
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", RP, 02:39
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 02:38
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 02:30
- Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories, Paul Stowe, 02:29
- Re: Electric Multipoles Beyond Octupoles?, Timo Nieminen, 02:20
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 02:02
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 02:02
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:55
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Ron Shepard, 01:54
- Electric Multipoles Beyond Octupoles?, hello, 01:44
- Theories of light 2: ether theories, Timo Nieminen, 01:32
- A new start point, Paolo, 01:13
- Re: River of shit, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 00:57
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 00:49
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 00:43
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Nick, 00:28
- Re: River of shit, Jim Logajan, 00:15
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", RP, 00:11
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 00:09
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", jimp, 00:09
October 17, 2005
- Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", Sam Wormley, 23:50
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Nick, 23:43
- Re: Units of inertia, RP, 23:42
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 23:39
- Re: The quantum of light; How does it condensate?, Nick, 23:37
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 23:20
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 23:07
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 23:04
- The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept", John2005, 23:02
- Re: Distance vs Quadrance?, Eric Gisse, 23:01
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 23:00
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 22:58
- Re: Petrol Prices, tj Frazir, 22:57
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Autymn D. C., 22:44
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Autymn D. C., 22:42
- Re: Homie don't play that., macromitch, 22:40
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 22:30
- The Purpose of Inflation, macromitch, 22:22
- Updated Baryon Materials, Jay R. Yablon, 22:18
- Re: The Myth of Black Holes, macromitch, 22:16
- Updated Baryon Materials, Jay R. Yablon, 22:15
- Re: River of shit, cnctut, 22:13
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 22:06
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222), david petry, 22:04
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Autymn D. C., 22:03
- Re: River of shit, platopes, 21:46
- Re: Units of inertia, Don1, 21:43
- Re: River of shit, raconte, 21:37
- Re: River of uncle Al's shit, hanson, 21:29
- Re: River of shit, hanson, 21:29
- This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222), John Baez, 21:25
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 21:15
- Re: Units of inertia, Tice with a J, 21:13
- Re: River of shit, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 21:11
- Re: The Myth of Black Holes, Igor, 20:57
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 20:53
- Units of inertia, Don1, 20:50
- Re: The Myth of Black Holes, macromitch, 20:48
- Re: River of shit, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 20:46
- Re: River of shit, Jason Stanidge, 20:38
- Re: River of shit, Jason Stanidge, 20:34
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Androcles, 20:29
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Rouben Rostamian, 20:10
- The Myth of Black Holes, macromitch, 20:03
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 19:49
- Re: River of shit, mmeron, 19:48
- Re: Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift., androc1es, 19:27
- Re: River of shit, Al Zenner, 19:12
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 18:44
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 18:32
- Re: River of shit, Androcles, 18:26
- Re: Rotational motion of planets, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:19
- Re: Rotational motion of planets, Jason Stanidge, 18:13
- Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Androcles, 18:13
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 18:08
- Re: River of shit, Me, 18:06
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, FrediFizzx, 17:59
- Re: River of shit, cnctut, 17:57
- Re: River of shit, tj Frazir, 17:57
- Re: River of shit, Traveler, 17:54
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 17:49
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 17:47
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Robert Low, 17:47
- Re: River of shit, platopes, 17:39
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, platopes, 17:31
- Re: River of shit, Wilco Oelen, 17:23
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 17:19
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 17:17
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 17:17
- Re: River of shit, cnctut, 17:16
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:04
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:01
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 17:00
- Re: why fire moves upward, platopes, 16:58
- Re: River of shit, Sam Wormley, 16:57
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 16:55
- Re: River of shit, Robert J. Kolker, 16:52
- Re: why fire moves upward, platopes, 16:49
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken Muldrew, 16:47
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, David R Tribble, 16:46
- Re: River of shit, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:20
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Robert Low, 16:18
- Re: NASDAQ is down 59 percent from where it was at the start of 2000., T Wake, 16:18
- Re: River of shit, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 16:15
- Re: River of shit, Greysky, 16:14
- Re: River of shit, Mark Thorson, 16:00
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 15:57
- Re: Baryons as Third Rank Antisymmetric Tensors, Jay R. Yablon, 15:44
- Re: NASDAQ is down 59 percent from where it was at the start of 2000., John Bailo, 15:44
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 15:41
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, salmonegg, 15:35
- Re: River of shit, Dirk Bruere at Neopax, 15:34
- River of shit, Uncle Al, 15:29
- Re: Baryons as Third Rank Antisymmetric Tensors, FrediFizzx, 15:19
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Robert J. Kolker, 15:15
- Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Uncle Al, 15:14
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, The Unstable Concoction of Fascinet, 15:03
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:40
- Re: NASDAQ is down 59 percent from where it was at the start of 2000., T Wake, 14:35
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 14:34
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 14:33
- Re: T_Wake is an idiot., T Wake, 14:31
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken Muldrew, 14:27
- Re: Petrol Prices, CWatters, 14:22
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 14:16
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:09
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 14:01
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:54
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 13:52
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Androcles, 13:49
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 13:30
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Eric Chomko, 13:19
- Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", tadchem, 13:03
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 12:52
- Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Harry, 12:47
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, beda-pietanza, 12:38
- Re: Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift., jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:35
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 12:20
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 12:13
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, PD, 12:02
- Re: why fire moves upward, PD, 11:54
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, PD, 11:52
- Re: message in the sky, tadchem, 11:34
- Re: message in the sky, Randy Poe, 11:34
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Don1, 11:33
- Re: why fire moves upward, Traveler, 11:25
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Mike, 11:24
- Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Androcles, 11:22
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Mark Martin, 11:19
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Don1, 11:19
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 11:13
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, tadchem, 11:11
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 11:04
- Re: New Physics Theory, PD, 11:01
- Re: why fire moves upward, platopes, 10:54
- Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Sam Wormley, 10:53
- Re: message in the sky, PD, 10:49
- Re: why fire moves upward, PD, 10:31
- "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Orex, 10:27
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, Harry, 10:26
- Re: why fire moves upward, PD, 10:25
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, PD, 10:20
- Re: Rotational motion of planets, Androcles, 10:19
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 10:11
- Re: Petrol Prices, jimp, 10:07
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Androcles, 10:06
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, PD, 10:00
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, PD, 09:53
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 09:51
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, PD, 09:27
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 09:14
- Petrol Prices, Null, 09:13
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, Mark Martin, 08:53
- Re: Baryons as Third Rank Antisymmetric Tensors, Jay R. Yablon, 08:50
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Mark Martin, 08:49
- Re: Is President Bush an Alien?, donstockbauer, 08:39
- Re: continuity, Andy Resnick, 08:35
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 08:19
- Rotational motion of planets, remove the o's, 08:17
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Robert Low, 06:32
- Re: When negative numbers are real, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:26
- Re: is this a hacker or is this a snag in Internet, donstockbauer, 06:15
- Re: Is President Bush an Alien?, donstockbauer, 05:56
- Re: is this a hacker or is this a snag in Internet, James "Kibo" Parry, 05:49
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 05:35
- Re: Physics for Geese, donstockbauer, 05:20
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Michael Gray, 05:14
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Lloyd Parker, 05:14
- Re: Physics for Geese, platopes, 04:56
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, pete, 04:51
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Richard Herring, 04:48
- Re: PHYSICS LETTERS PAPER ON SUBQUARKS (3 subquarks = 1 quark, possible?), h . poropudas, 04:38
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., platopes, 04:37
- Re: Baryons as Third Rank Antisymmetric Tensors, FrediFizzx, 04:24
- Re: Article: A large population of galaxies 9 to 12 billion years back in the history of the Universe (HTML), jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:24
- Re: message in the sky, CWatters, 03:59
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, Greysky, 03:41
- Re: NASDAQ is down 59 percent from where it was at the start of 2000., John Bailo, 03:36
- Re: Bailo, What's the matter with you ?, John Bailo, 03:35
- Bailo, What's the matter with you ?, Jeff_Relf, 03:24
- Re: T_Wake is an idiot., John Bailo, 03:08
- Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind., MorituriMax, 02:52
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, MorituriMax, 02:51
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, MorituriMax, 02:50
- T_Wake is an idiot., Jeff_Relf, 02:25
- NASDAQ is down 59 percent from where it was at the start of 2000., Jeff_Relf, 02:18
- Re: A universal constant for relativity?, Mark Fergerson, 02:00
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, Sam Wormley, 01:34
- Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY, Tice with a J, 01:17
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 00:48
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, Tice with a J, 00:38
- Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, Tice with a J, 00:36
October 16, 2005
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Autymn D. C., 23:57
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Autymn D. C., 23:53
- Baryons as Third Rank Antisymmetric Tensors, Jay R. Yablon, 23:52
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 23:49
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 23:45
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 23:43
- Re: A universal constant for relativity?, Sam Wormley, 23:30
- Re: Does time exist ?, Jason Stanidge, 23:17
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 22:57
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 22:52
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Jay R. Yablon, 22:50
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 22:42
- Re: T.J.'s engine design., tj Frazir, 22:42
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 22:36
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 22:29
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Mark Martin, 22:27
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 22:21
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 22:13
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 22:01
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Timo Nieminen, 21:56
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 21:50
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Ken S. Tucker, 21:44
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 21:39
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, donstockbauer, 21:30
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 21:27
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 21:23
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 21:01
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Timo Nieminen, 21:01
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 20:56
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 20:50
- Re: Physics for Geese, cnctut, 20:35
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 20:30
- Re: Posted another Preview Paper, Ken S. Tucker, 20:29
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 20:21
- Re: Physics for Geese, platopes, 20:19
- Re: why fire moves upward, gubernacullum, 20:16
- Re: Physics for Geese, cnctut, 20:10
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Autymn D. C., 19:59
- Re: God and storms, Autymn D. C., 19:53
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 19:32
- Re: The Speed of Light is Constant by Defintion, kenseto, 19:22
- Re: Physics for Geese, Androcles, 19:22
- Relfia, John Bailo, 19:11
- T.J.'s engine design., Jeff_Relf, 19:06
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 18:17
- Re: message in the sky, Androcles, 18:07
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Androcles, 18:02
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Androcles, 18:01
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Androcles, 18:01
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 18:01
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 18:01
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 18:00
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 18:00
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 18:00
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 18:00
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 17:59
- Re: a good online textbook, Androcles, 17:59
- Drug_addled_waif_chicks with rare talents., Jeff_Relf, 17:58
- Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Androcles, 17:58
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Androcles, 17:56
- Re: YOU TOO, Androcles, 17:56
- Re: Heavy ions damage DNA, Androcles, 17:56
- Re: New Physics Theory, Androcles, 17:54
- Re: New Physics Theory, Androcles, 17:54
- Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question, Androcles, 17:54
- Re: why fire moves upward, Androcles, 17:52
- Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question, Androcles, 17:52
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 17:51
- Re: Something to relever me by, Androcles, 17:50
- Re: Space Waste, Space Junk, Androcles, 17:49
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Androcles, 17:49
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Androcles, 17:49
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Androcles, 17:48
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Androcles, 17:48
- Re: why fire moves upward, Androcles, 17:48
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Androcles, 17:47
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Henry Haapalainen, 17:46
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?, Androcles, 17:44
- Re: curses curses and more curses, Stevie B, 17:36
- Interpreting Quantum Mechanics, Robert, 17:23
- Re: Physics for Geese, cnctut, 17:18
- Re: A universal constant for relativity?, news, 17:05
- Re: A universal constant for relativity?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:03
- Re: gaining the waist, Mark Martin, 17:00
- Re: The Speed of Light is Constant by Defintion, Lady Chatterly, 16:58
- Re: state variables, Bob, 16:54
- Re: Physics for Geese, Mark Martin, 16:45
- Re: Physics for Geese, Sam Wormley, 16:42
- Re: A universal constant for relativity?, news, 16:42
- Re: heat engine, Stevie B, 16:42
- Re: A universal constant for relativity?, Sam Wormley, 16:36
- gaining the waist, dedanoe, 16:33
- message in the sky, John Baez, 16:31
- Re: My Red Ball, Stevie B, 16:24
- Re: My Red Ball, Stevie B, 16:22
- Re: Poll: Math and Calculators (was: How to Fix Texas Instruments), mmeron, 16:21
- state variables, biplabbose@xxxxxxxxx, 16:15
- Re: My Red Ball, Josie Margolis, 16:08
- Re: A universal constant for relativity?, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:00
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 15:58
- Physics for Geese, cnctut, 15:55
- Re: My Red Ball, Stevie B, 15:46
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 15:27
- Re: A universal constant for relativity?, news, 15:25
- PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY, ACE, 15:21
- Re: A universal constant for relativity?, Androcles, 15:21
- Re: A universal constant for relativity?, Sam Wormley, 15:11
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Uncle Al, 15:06
- Re: Study Shows Silver Nanoparticles Attach to HIV-1 virus, hanson @shittyplanet.com, 15:06
- Re: A universal constant for relativity?, news, 15:05
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Uncle Al, 15:05
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Uncle Al, 15:04
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Uncle Al, 15:04
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Uncle Al, 15:04
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Uncle Al, 15:04
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Uncle Al, 15:03
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Uncle Al, 15:03
- Re: why fire moves upward, Uncle Al, 15:02
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Uncle Al, 15:02
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Uncle Al, 15:02
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Uncle Al, 15:01
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Uncle Al, 15:01
- Re: New Physics Theory, Uncle Al, 15:01
- Re: New Physics Theory, Uncle Al, 15:01
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Uncle Al, 15:01
- Re: a good online textbook, Uncle Al, 15:01
- Re: Heavy ions damage DNA, Uncle Al, 15:01
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Uncle Al, 15:01
- Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question, Uncle Al, 15:00
- Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question, Uncle Al, 15:00
- Re: Something to relever me by, Uncle Al, 15:00
- Re: Space Waste, Space Junk, Uncle Al, 15:00
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Uncle Al, 15:00
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Uncle Al, 15:00
- Re: curses curses and more curses, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
- Re: YOU TOO, Uncle Al, 14:59
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?, Uncle Al, 14:59
- Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Uncle Al, 14:54
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 14:46
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 14:44
- Re: Light Photons/Waves, Stevie B, 14:36
- Re: A universal constant for relativity?, Sam Wormley, 14:32
- Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind., tj Frazir, 14:30
- Re: My Red Ball, Stevie B, 14:26
- A universal constant for relativity?, news, 14:23
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 26: A Beautiful Mind Via Saddle Points, OsherD, 14:19
- Re: continuity, Autymn D. C., 14:12
- Independent/Dependent Phases 26: A Beautiful Mind Via Saddle Points, OsherD, 14:07
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 14:05
- Posted another Preview Paper, Jay R. Yablon, 14:05
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, William of Ockham, 14:04
- Re: heat engine, Autymn D. C., 13:53
- Re: curses curses and more curses, Autymn D. C., 13:50
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 13:45
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 13:31
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 13:30
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., gerard46, 13:18
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, abe . buckingham, 13:11
- Re: Mass and volume, Sam Wormley, 13:09
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Autymn D. C., 12:55
- Re: Is President Bush an Alien?, donstockbauer, 12:54
- Re: Article: A large population of galaxies 9 to 12 billion years back in the history of the Universe (HTML), Autymn D. C., 12:51
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 12:42
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, CWatters, 12:23
- Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind., tj Frazir, 12:02
- Re: why fire moves upward, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
- Re: Study Shows Silver Nanoparticles Attach to HIV-1 virus, hanson, 11:58
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 11:51
- Mass and volume, Don1, 11:49
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, Mark Martin, 11:40
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:40
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Al Zenner, 11:38
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, hhc314, 11:35
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 11:32
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Androcles, 11:30
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Ron Shepard, 11:29
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, A.T., 11:26
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, A.T., 11:22
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, pete, 11:17
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 11:03
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 11:02
- Re: Energy surplus house in Nottingham, jimp, 11:00
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Herman Trivilino, 10:56
- Re: How consciousness really works, dedanoe, 10:51
- Re: Movement in an independent frame of reference, which is made out of light, Hero . van . Jindelt, 10:48
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Steve Ralph, 10:29
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, john_ramsden, 10:28
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Rod Ryker, 10:27
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Don1, 10:26
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Don1, 10:22
- Re: GEORGE BUSH IS A ROTHSCHILD Re: Is President Bush an Alien?, Will Janoschka, 10:22
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 10:21
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 10:13
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., john_ramsden, 10:13
- Re: Pi, Ahmet Hungari, 10:08
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 10:07
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 10:03
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 10:01
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:57
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 09:51
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:50
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Androcles, 09:47
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 09:41
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 09:40
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 09:39
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 09:38
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 09:37
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 09:35
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 09:32
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:31
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 09:30
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 09:26
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 09:24
- Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity, None, 09:21
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 09:20
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 09:17
- Re: My last good deed., T Wake, 09:16
- Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind., T Wake, 09:15
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Androcles, 09:09
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, Sam Wormley, 09:08
- Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind., T Wake, 09:08
- Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind., T Wake, 09:07
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, David Kastrup, 09:06
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:02
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, Androcles, 09:00
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, Dirk Van de moortel, 08:57
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Don1, 08:53
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, xenonii, 08:47
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, xenonii, 08:40
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, Mark Fergerson, 08:28
- Re: projectile: need to know angle, nowaycomputer, 08:28
- Re: It's a pity ain't it, Steve Ralph, 08:26
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Don1, 08:09
- Re: Poll: Math and Calculators (was: How to Fix Texas Instruments), jmfbahciv, 08:07
- Re: When magnets do work by lifting things, do they get colder?, donstockbauer, 07:43
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, donstockbauer, 07:35
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Don1, 07:28
- Re: My Red Ball, donstockbauer, 07:26
- Re: Pi, Androcles, 06:22
- Re: What are UFOs, Mike Lepore, 06:20
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 06:05
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, John Christiansen, 05:59
- Re: Study Shows Silver Nanoparticles Attach to HIV-1 virus, Mike, 05:57
- Re: My Red Ball, platopes, 05:55
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, William of Ockham, 05:53
- Re: When magnets do work by lifting things, do they get colder?, platopes, 05:20
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 04:52
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 04:49
- Re: why fire moves upward, platopes, 04:45
- Re: Reading God's mind? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, Bilge, 04:36
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Robert Low, 04:32
- Re: Posting Web Site Previews of Upcoming Papars, brian a m stuckless, 04:27
- Re: why fire moves upward, CWatters, 04:22
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bilge, 04:08
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bilge, 03:54
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 25: De Broglie Wave-Particle Duality by 1/2, OsherD, 03:42
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 03:35
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 25: De Broglie Wave-Particle Duality by 1/2, OsherD, 03:30
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Bill Hobba, 03:24
- PNN: Propulsione Non Newtoniana, asps, 03:16
- Independent/Dependent Phases 25: De Broglie Wave-Particle Duality by 1/2, OsherD, 03:15
- Re: My Red Ball, Autymn D. C., 03:10
- Re: quantum consciousness, Autymn D. C., 03:06
- Re: Light Photons/Waves, Autymn D. C., 03:04
- Independent/Dependent Phases 24: Max Born Probability Interpretation Via 1/2, OsherD, 03:03
- Re: Light Photons/Waves, Autymn D. C., 03:02
- Re: Reading God's mind? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, platopes, 02:56
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., platopes, 02:35
- Re: Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave, Eric Gisse, 02:20
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Bilge, 02:19
- Re: When magnets do work by lifting things, do they get colder?, Autymn D. C., 02:15
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Autymn D. C., 01:53
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 01:27
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., donstockbauer, 01:12
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 01:10
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, donstockbauer, 00:52
- Re: How consciousness really works, donstockbauer, 00:10
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, donstockbauer, 00:03
October 15, 2005
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., john_ramsden, 23:55
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Autymn D. C., 23:54
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, john_ramsden, 23:41
- Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind., Mark Martin, 23:39
- Re: why fire moves upward, Mark Martin, 23:26
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 23:23
- Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind., tj Frazir, 23:21
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Autymn D. C., 23:16
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 23:12
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Autymn D. C., 23:11
- Re: why fire moves upward, tj Frazir, 23:07
- Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind., tj Frazir, 23:02
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 22:37
- Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind., tj Frazir, 22:36
- Re: Poll: Math and Calculators (was: How to Fix Texas Instruments), mmeron, 21:22
- Re: Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave, Androcles, 21:07
- Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind., John Bailo, 20:57
- T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind., Jeff_Relf, 20:49
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 20:42
- Re: My last good deed., John Bailo, 20:40
- My last good deed., Jeff_Relf, 20:25
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Paul Stowe, 20:24
- Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, hanson, 20:06
- Re: What are UFOs, Michael Gray, 20:03
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Don1, 19:43
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:34
- Re: What are UFOs, elson, 19:25
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:15
- Re: why fire moves upward, Androcles, 19:13
- Re: Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave, carlip-nospam, 19:01
- Spoiled_Brat doesn't even begin to describe these two waifs., Jeff_Relf, 19:00
- Re: why fire moves upward, The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 18:32
- Re: Poor Bilge., tj Frazir, 18:06
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 18:05
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Bill Hobba, 17:59
- Re: The economy really sucks right now., tj Frazir, 17:56
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 17:53
- Re: The firefighters would arrive well after I was out of the house., T Wake, 17:52
- Re: Most people on Usenet are mainly talking to themselves., T Wake, 17:49
- Re: Most people on Usenet are mainly talking to themselves., T Wake, 17:48
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 23.2: "Varying universal constants", OsherD, 17:46
- Re: For some people, heroin comes first, last and always., T Wake, 17:45
- Re: why fire moves upward, Mark Martin, 17:38
- Re: T_Wake continually fails to make the distinction between immunodeciency and FIV., T Wake, 17:37
- Re: why fire moves upward, GQrivy, 17:32
- Re: Usenet is plain_text... not HTML or MicroSoft_Word's .DOC format., T Wake, 17:31
- Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, donstockbauer, 17:29
- Re: Reading God's mind? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, Bill Hobba, 17:28
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, David R Tribble, 17:25
- Independent/Dependent Phases 23.2: "Varying universal constants", OsherD, 17:20
- Re: T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?, tj Frazir, 17:15
- why fire moves upward, vsgdp, 17:07
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Cardinal Chunder, 17:03
- Re: T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?, tj Frazir, 17:02
- Independent/Dependent Phases 23.1: Thermal and Electromagnetic Dimensions, OsherD, 17:02
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 16:51
- Re: Posting Web Site Previews of Upcoming Papars, Sue..., 16:46
- It's a pity ain't it, Don1, 16:38
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 16:34
- Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, hanson, 16:26
- Re: Posting Web Site Previews of Upcoming Papars, Sue..., 16:18
- Re: Study Shows Silver Nanoparticles Attach to HIV-1 virus, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:10
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 15:50
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Ross A. Finlayson, 15:30
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Ross A. Finlayson, 15:16
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Jim Spriggs, 15:02
- Re: If you like my ideas you can use them, if not, well, that's fine too., The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
- Re: T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?, tj Frazir, 14:55
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:52
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Androcles, 14:52
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Androcles, 14:52
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Androcles, 14:51
- Re: New Physics Theory, Androcles, 14:50
- Re: New Physics Theory, Androcles, 14:50
- Re: New Physics Theory, Androcles, 14:49
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Androcles, 14:49
- Re: a good online textbook, Androcles, 14:48
- Re: Heavy ions damage DNA, Androcles, 14:48
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Androcles, 14:47
- Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question, Androcles, 14:47
- Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question, Androcles, 14:46
- Re: Something to relever me by, Androcles, 14:46
- Re: Space Waste, Space Junk, Androcles, 14:46
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Androcles, 14:45
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Androcles, 14:44
- YOU TOO, Androcles, 14:44
- Re: T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?, tj Frazir, 14:42
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?, Androcles, 14:33
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 14:32
- Re: T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?, tj Frazir, 14:29
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Minus XVII, 14:26
- Re: T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?, tj Frazir, 14:20
- yourgrau book on Einstein and Gödel --- which Gödel paper is it, HK, 14:19
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Sam Wormley, 14:14
- Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Sam Wormley, 14:10
- Re: New Physics Theory, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:50
- Re: Learning Type Theory in Church, Jim Spriggs, 13:43
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 13:41
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 13:40
- "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Erom, 13:37
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Don1, 13:25
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Don1, 13:23
- Re: New Physics Theory, Uncle Al, 13:16
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 13:04
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", donstockbauer, 12:54
- Re: Reading God's mind? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:53
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?, john_ramsden, 12:52
- Re: PHYSICS LETTERS PAPER ON SUBQUARKS (3 subquarks = 1 quark, possible?), Jay R. Yablon, 12:49
- Posting Web Site Previews of Upcoming Papars, Jay R. Yablon, 12:42
- Re: New Physics Theory, john_ramsden, 12:40
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, jan hauben, 12:39
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 12:20
- Re: Reading God's mind? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, Mike, 12:18
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 12:13
- Re: Reading God's mind? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, Mike, 12:10
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Sam Wormley, 12:08
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., ianparker2, 12:02
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 11:54
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 11:53
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Robert J. Kolker, 11:49
- Re: If you like my ideas you can use them, if not, well, that's fine too., John Bailo, 11:42
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 11:40
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Uncle Al, 11:27
- Re: New Physics Theory, Uncle Al, 11:26
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 11:26
- Re: Space Waste, Space Junk, Uncle Al, 11:21
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Don1, 11:20
- Re: Something to relever me by, Uncle Al, 11:18
- Learning Type Theory in Church, Daryl McCullough, 11:12
- Re: Heavy ions damage DNA, Uncle Al, 11:10
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Uncle Al, 11:08
- Re: Space Waste, Space Junk, Mark Martin, 11:02
- Re: New Physics Theory, Androcles, 11:01
- Re: What are UFOs, ianparker2, 10:58
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?, Uncle Al, 10:56
- Re: New Physics Theory, Uncle Al, 10:55
- Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question, Uncle Al, 10:54
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Uncle Al, 10:54
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Uncle Al, 10:53
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Uncle Al, 10:52
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Uncle Al, 10:51
- Re: a good online textbook, Uncle Al, 10:51
- Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question, Uncle Al, 10:51
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, Uncle Al, 10:50
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Uncle Al, 10:49
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 10:40
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Jim Spriggs, 10:39
- Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?, Androcles, 10:36
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 23: Generalized Dimensional Analysis With 1/2, OsherD, 10:34
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 10:32
- Re: a good online textbook, strings, 10:28
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 10:23
- Re: Pi, odin, 10:20
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 23: Generalized Dimensional Analysis With 1/2, OsherD, 10:08
- Independent/Dependent Phases 23: Generalized Dimensional Analysis With 1/2, OsherD, 09:54
- Re: Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Sam Wormley, 09:52
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 09:47
- It takes testing and debugging to understand code of any length., Jeff_Relf, 09:45
- Euclidean physics vs Non-Eucliean physics, Don1, 09:44
- Re: New Physics Theory, Torval Haakon, 09:42
- Re: Pi, jmfbahciv, 09:26
- Re: New Physics Theory, Androcles, 09:25
- Re: Poll: Math and Calculators (was: How to Fix Texas Instruments), jmfbahciv, 09:25
- Re: New Physics Theory, Sam Wormley, 09:21
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 09:21
- Who will stun the world as next Einstein?, Jeany, 09:20
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Don1, 09:11
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 09:06
- Re: Pi, tadchem, 09:02
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 09:02
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 08:59
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 08:57
- New Physics Theory, Don, 08:29
- Space Waste, Space Junk, Helmut Wabnig, 08:00
- Re: Mass vs Matter, David Thomson, 07:46
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 07:40
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, abo, 07:39
- Re: If you like my ideas you can use them, if not, well, that's fine too., donstockbauer, 07:37
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Torkel Franzen, 07:34
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, john_ramsden, 07:26
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 07:17
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, donstockbauer, 07:15
- Re: Mass vs Matter, David Thomson, 07:11
- Re: TRAGEDY ON ONE OF THE WORLD'S MAIN FAULT LINES, donstockbauer, 07:08
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 06:57
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Ross A. Finlayson, 06:42
- Re: Reading God's mind? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:26
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Don1, 06:25
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Don1, 06:21
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 06:16
- Re: What are UFOs, elson, 06:00
- Re: Reading God's mind? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, Bill Hobba, 05:53
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Ross A. Finlayson, 05:47
- Re: Pi, mmeron, 05:41
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:40
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:25
- If you like my ideas you can use them, if not, well, that's fine too., Jeff_Relf, 05:24
- Re: Pi, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:22
- Something to relever me by, dedanoe, 05:12
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 04:57
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 04:44
- Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question, Androcles, 04:37
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Androcles, 04:34
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Androcles, 04:29
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 04:23
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Ross A. Finlayson, 04:22
- Reading God's mind? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, Mike, 04:00
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 03:57
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, CWatters, 03:55
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 03:44
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 22: 196 Papers on Long Memory/Hysteresis, OsherD, 02:26
- Re: When negative numbers are real, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:24
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 22: 196 Papers on Long Memory/Hysteresis, OsherD, 02:17
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Eric Gisse, 02:12
- Re: Show me a simpler, easier to read, more functional newsreader if you can., The Ghost In The Machine, 02:00
- Independent/Dependent Phases 22: 196 Papers on Long Memory/Hysteresis, OsherD, 01:58
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Eric Gisse, 01:54
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 01:50
- Giving without expectation is real., Jeff_Relf, 01:39
- Re: Study Shows Silver Nanoparticles Attach to HIV-1 virus, hanson, 01:37
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 00:59
- Re: The economy really sucks right now., Bob Cain, 00:57
- Re: Pi, mmeron, 00:52
- Re: Pi, odin, 00:41
- Saturn's craggy moon Hyperion tumbles erratically as it orbits the planet, Sam Wormley, 00:27
- Re: Pi, Ahmet Hungari, 00:00
October 14, 2005
- Study Shows Silver Nanoparticles Attach to HIV-1 virus, Mike, 23:59
- Re: HARRY C. COCKSMOKER EXTRAORDINAIRE!, hhc314, 23:45
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 23:45
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Charlie Springer, 23:34
- Re: HARRY C IS MY LATEST , hhc314, 23:29
- Re: http://www.bookoogle.com/book/, donstockbauer, 23:24
- Re: http://www.bookoogle.com/book/, hhc314, 23:19
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, donstockbauer, 23:19
- Re: When negative numbers are real, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:18
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, Eric Gisse, 23:14
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 23:10
- Re: Pi, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 22:51
- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 October 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 22:51
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 22:44
- Heavy ions damage DNA, Sam Wormley, 22:27
- Hard working thieves ?, Jeff_Relf, 22:23
- Hard working thieves ?, Jeff_Relf, 22:21
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, odin, 22:18
- T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?, Jeff_Relf, 22:11
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:59
- What gets stolen., Jeff_Relf, 21:56
- Re: What are UFOs, Brad Guth, 21:55
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:54
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 21:48
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Will Janoschka, 21:48
- Re: What are UFOs uniformed ing orleans, Brad Guth, 21:47
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:46
- http://www.bookoogle.com/book/, anilkbatra, 21:38
- Re: The economy really sucks right now., High Plains Thumper, 21:32
- Re: Move along., High Plains Thumper, 21:30
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:30
- Re: HARRY C IS MY LATEST , donstockbauer, 21:30
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 21:27
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Orion, 21:24
- Re: Pi, brian a m stuckless, 21:17
- Re: HARRY C. COCKSMOKER EXTRAORDINAIRE!, donstockbauer, 21:16
- Re: Pi, mike4ty4, 21:09
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 21:07
- Re: Pi = circumference/diameter, abe . buckingham, 21:05
- Re: Mass vs Matter, brian a m stuckless, 21:04
- Urgent mass matter.!!, brian a m stuckless, 21:04
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 20:57
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, tj Frazir, 20:54
- Re: Move along., John Bailo, 20:47
- Re: Most people on Usenet are mainly talking to themselves., tj Frazir, 20:47
- Re: The economy really sucks right now., John Bailo, 20:46
- Pi = circumference/diameter, Don1, 20:46
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 20:42
- The economy really sucks right now., Jeff_Relf, 20:36
- Re: Please Sir... may I have some more ?, High Plains Thumper, 20:33
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 21: 0 and 1 as Phase Boundaries, OsherD, 20:29
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, western1lands, 20:19
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 20:12
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 21: 0 and 1 as Phase Boundaries, OsherD, 20:12
- T_Wake continually fails to make the distinction between immunodeciency and FIV., Jeff_Relf, 20:10
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 19:59
- Most people on Usenet are mainly talking to themselves., Jeff_Relf, 19:59
- Re: The firefighters would arrive well after I was out of the house., Jeff_Relf, 19:51
- Usenet is plain_text... not HTML or MicroSoft_Word's .DOC format., Jeff_Relf, 19:43
- Re: Does time exist ?, platopes, 19:39
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 19:35
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 21: 0 and 1 as Phase Boundaries, OsherD, 19:35
- For some people, heroin comes first, last and always., Jeff_Relf, 19:31
- Re: Pi, brian a m stuckless, 19:30
- Re: Pi, Sam Wormley, 19:25
- Re: The firefighters would arrive well after I was out of the house., T Wake, 19:21
- Re: Show me a simpler, easier to read, more functional newsreader if you can., T Wake, 19:19
- Show me a simpler, easier to read, more functional newsreader if you can., Jeff_Relf, 19:09
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 19:09
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, Androcles, 19:05
- Re: The firefighters would arrive well after I was out of the house., Jeff_Relf, 19:03
- Re: Does time exist ?, Traveler, 19:03
- Independent/Dependent Phases 21: 0 and 1 as Phase Boundaries, OsherD, 18:56
- Re: Oscilating mass of ideal liquid, EugeniuszW, 18:45
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Oct 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 18:44
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 18:44
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Androcles, 18:43
- Re: Oscilating mass of ideal liquid, EugeniuszW, 18:38
- Re: Oscilating mass of ideal liquid, EugeniuszW, 18:32
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Androcles, 18:31
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 18:26
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 20: The Reasons For 1/2 As Phase Boundary, OsherD, 18:23
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 18:18
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 18:18
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 20: The Reasons For 1/2 As Phase Boundary, OsherD, 18:15
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 18:07
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, lightenergy, 18:03
- Re: Pi, PD, 18:01
- Re: GRAVITY, YOU RETARDED MONKEY!, hhc314, 17:58
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, FrediFizzx, 17:53
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 17:47
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 17:46
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 17:46
- Re: Pi, mmeron, 17:42
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 17:41
- Re: capacitor discharge, hhc314, 17:40
- Re: Pi, PD, 17:33
- Oscilating mass of ideal liquid, EugeniuszW, 17:30
- Re: capacitor discharge, hhc314, 17:30
- Re: Pi, mmeron, 17:28
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 17:26
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., T Wake, 17:25
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., T Wake, 17:25
- Pedagogical Machine, jordan, 17:24
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 20: The Reasons For 1/2 As Phase Boundary, hhc314, 17:23
- Re: Poll: Math and Calculators (was: How to Fix Texas Instruments), mmeron, 17:16
- Re: Pi, PD, 17:15
- Re: Pi, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:11
- Re: Pi, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:09
- Re: Pi, PD, 17:08
- Re: Pi, mmeron, 17:01
- Re: Poll: Math and Calculators (was: How to Fix Texas Instruments), Tiny Human Ferret, 17:00
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, harmon_eigenspace, 16:48
- Re: Pi, The Unstable Concoction of Fascinet, 16:47
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, PD, 16:05
- Re: a good online textbook, Androcles, 16:04
- Re: Pi, donstockbauer, 16:02
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 16:01
- Re: I know what I'm doing... suckers., The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, PD, 15:57
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Robert J. Kolker, 15:56
- Re: Just a millimeter, PD, 15:51
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 15:45
- Re: Pi, donstockbauer, 15:42
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., tj Frazir, 15:41
- Movement in an independent frame of reference, which is made out of light, Hero . van . Jindelt, 15:40
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 15:38
- Re: Pi, odin, 15:38
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 15:37
- Re: Pi, PD, 15:32
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, donstockbauer, 15:31
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., tj Frazir, 15:27
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:27
- Re: Does time exist ?, platopes, 15:20
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 15:19
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Uncle Al, 15:09
- Re: Pi, Uncle Al, 15:09
- Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question, Androcles, 15:07
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Uncle Al, 15:05
- Re: a good online textbook, Uncle Al, 15:04
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, Uncle Al, 15:04
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Uncle Al, 15:03
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Uncle Al, 15:01
- Pi, Don1, 14:58
- Re: a good online textbook, PD, 14:48
- Re: Intelligent Explanation of Intelligent Design, Marvin, 14:42
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Androcles, 14:40
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Androcles, 14:38
- Re: Electric fields have been used to produce vortex rings in pure water, Happy Hippy, 14:37
- Re: a good online textbook, Androcles, 14:22
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 14:19
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 14:19
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 14:19
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, Androcles, 14:18
- Re: The firefighters would arrive well after I was out of the house., T Wake, 14:17
- Re: I've been telling everyone to go away., T Wake, 14:15
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., T Wake, 14:13
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., T Wake, 14:13
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Androcles, 14:12
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., T Wake, 14:12
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., T Wake, 14:11
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, tadchem, 14:09
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Jonathan Silverlight, 14:08
- Re: What causes immunodeficiency in rats., T Wake, 14:08
- Re: a good online textbook, tadchem, 14:07
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, odin, 14:06
- Re: I know what I'm doing... suckers., T Wake, 14:02
- Re: I will not be using condoms., T Wake, 14:00
- Re: Protection from electromagnetic radiation, tadchem, 13:58
- Re: Protection from electromagnetic radiation, Dave, 13:54
- Re: Protection from electromagnetic radiation, Dave, 13:50
- Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question, Uncle Al, 13:49
- Re: Protection from electromagnetic radiation, Dave, 13:47
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, T Wake, 13:46
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Uncle Al, 13:45
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Uncle Al, 13:45
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Smolley, 13:44
- Chandra Observatory reveals new star generation, Sam Wormley, 13:42
- Re: a good online textbook, Uncle Al, 13:40
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, Uncle Al, 13:36
- Re: I will not be using condoms., Uncle Al, 13:34
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Uncle Al, 13:34
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Uncle Al, 13:33
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, briggs, 13:31
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 13:24
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 13:10
- Self Assembled Monolayers Question, jacob . trevino, 13:09
- Re: uncertain abt uncertainity, Puppet_Sock, 13:03
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, PD, 12:54
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, PD, 12:53
- Re: Electric fields have been used to produce vortex rings in pure water, tadchem, 12:49
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 12:41
- Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes - "yes" it's possible today!, StilllovingMarty, 12:40
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:36
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 12:32
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:31
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, mmeron, 12:27
- Re: Thrust, CWatters, 12:17
- Re: agreement and knowledge, Robert J. Kolker, 12:12
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, briggs, 12:12
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Sam Wormley, 12:09
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 12:05
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 12:02
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Richard Herring, 12:02
- "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Erom, 11:52
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:49
- Electric fields have been used to produce vortex rings in pure water, Sam Wormley, 11:47
- Re: Einstein, Maric, Political Correctness, Nova, PBS, tj Frazir, 11:44
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:43
- Re: The quantum of light; How does it condensate?, Paul Cardinale, 11:40
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 11:36
- Re: Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., Douglas Eagleson, 11:26
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 11:25
- Re: uncertain abt uncertainity, oldton, 11:23
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, PD, 11:20
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, PD, 11:12
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Androcles, 11:09
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Robert J. Kolker, 11:08
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Androcles, 11:08
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, Puppet_Sock, 11:01
- Re: Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:01
- Re: Better then startrek, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
- Re: uncertain abt uncertainity, Sam Wormley, 10:57
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, PD, 10:54
- uncertain abt uncertainity, oldton, 10:50
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 10:47
- Re: capacitor discharge, oldton, 10:43
- Re: capacitor discharge, John C . Polasek, 10:40
- Re: capacitor discharge, oldton, 10:35
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 10:26
- Re: Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave, Puppet_Sock, 10:20
- Re: Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave, Mark Martin, 10:20
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Richard Herring, 10:15
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, Andy Resnick, 10:10
- Re: Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave, oldton, 10:06
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 10:05
- Re: capacitor discharge, Androcles, 10:05
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Androcles, 10:03
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, tadchem, 10:00
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 09:58
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, tadchem, 09:55
- Re: The quantum of light; How does it condensate?, Igor, 09:52
- Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave, Jos, 09:50
- Re: Does time exist ?, Traveler, 09:48
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 09:46
- Re: Does time exist ?, DBLEXPOSURE, 09:39
- Re: Eotvos - latest news., Androcles, 09:36
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Smolley, 09:31
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, PD, 09:27
- Re: agreement and knowledge, john_ramsden, 09:26
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Mark Martin, 09:25
- Re: Thrust, tadchem, 09:24
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, LZ, 09:23
- Re: Does time exist ?, PD, 09:23
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, briggs, 09:19
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Sam Wormley, 09:18
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 09:16
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Don1, 09:13
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 09:09
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 09:06
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Richard Herring, 09:05
- Re: i wanna be a crackpot, john_ramsden, 09:03
- Re: Two Stars with same mass, Mark Martin, 09:02
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 08:56
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 08:36
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, PD, 08:29
- Re: Mass vs Matter, David Thomson, 08:29
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Don1, 08:19
- Two Stars with same mass, George, 08:13
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 20: The Reasons For 1/2 As Phase Boundary, OsherD, 08:05
- Re: Thrust, Don1, 08:02
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 07:58
- Independent/Dependent Phases 20: The Reasons For 1/2 As Phase Boundary, OsherD, 07:43
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 07:35
- Re: GEORGE BUSH IS A ROTHSCHILD Re: Is President Bush an Alien?, donstockbauer, 07:31
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 07:31
- Re: Thrust, Don1, 07:29
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 07:27
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, donstockbauer, 07:24
- Re: Mass vs Matter, donstockbauer, 07:20
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 07:14
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 07:11
- Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes - "yes" it's possible today!, jmfbahciv, 07:06
- Re: When negative numbers are real, donstockbauer, 07:03
- Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes - "yes" it's possible today!, jmfbahciv, 07:03
- Re: Does time exist ?, donstockbauer, 07:00
- Re: Does time exist ?, Harry, 06:58
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 06:57
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, donstockbauer, 06:56
- Re: When negative numbers are real, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:51
- Re: What are UFOs, elson, 06:49
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 06:46
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 06:45
- Re: i wanna be a crackpot, donstockbauer, 06:44
- Re: i wanna be a crackpot, pete, 06:36
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, jmfbahciv, 06:36
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 06:34
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, jmfbahciv, 06:32
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, jmfbahciv, 06:30
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 06:29
- Re: Eotvos - latest news., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:18
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 06:18
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 06:12
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:12
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 06:07
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 05:53
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 05:52
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 05:51
- Re: agreement and knowledge, strings, 05:47
- I've been telling everyone to go away., Jeff_Relf, 05:38
- Re: Does time exist ?, tadchem, 05:33
- Re: Does time exist ?, tadchem, 05:27
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 05:16
- Re: i wanna be a crackpot, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 05:09
- Re: capacitor discharge, anilmanual, 05:06
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 04:56
- Re: Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions, Androcles, 04:56
- Re: 1 + 1 = 2, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 04:54
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Androcles, 04:48
- Re: capacitor discharge, Androcles, 04:44
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, CWatters, 04:37
- Re: Thrust, CWatters, 04:26
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Lloyd Parker, 04:25
- Re: capacitor discharge, CWatters, 04:22
- Re: GRAVITY, YOU RETARDED MONKEY!, lbh, 04:13
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, pete, 04:03
- Re: Please Sir... may I have some more ?, DrSquare (New and Improved) Ver. 1.1, 03:51
- Re: I will not be using condoms., Bob Cain, 03:51
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Bob Cain, 03:48
- Re: The phuckwit "Uncle Al" doesn't know what escape velocity is!, Androcles, 03:39
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 03:15
- New Website, sina sodagar, 03:08
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 03:02
- Re: capacitor discharge, Helmut Wabnig, 02:56
- GRAVITY, YOU RETARDED MONKEY!, Anonymous, 02:46
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:40
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., John Bailo, 02:05
- Re: Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., makc . the . great, 02:02
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, franklinhu, 02:02
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 19.4: Which Quadric Intersections Yield (Phase) 1/2, OsherD, 02:02
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 19.4: Which Quadric Intersections Yield (Phase) 1/2, OsherD, 01:30
- capacitor discharge, anilmanual, 01:29
- Re: What are UFOs, Mike Lepore, 01:13
- Re: i wanna be a crackpot, Order of the Solar Temple, 01:12
- Re: just between you and me, Order of the Solar Temple, 01:11
- Re: agreement and knowledge, Order of the Solar Temple, 01:10
- Independent/Dependent Phases 19.4: Which Quadric Intersections Yield (Phase) 1/2, OsherD, 01:09
- Re: Does time exist ?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 01:02
- Re: What are UFOs, elson, 00:42
- Re: why don't certain things liquify?, Sam Wormley, 00:09
October 13, 2005
- Re: Does time exist ?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 23:58
- Re: Does time exist ?, DBLEXPOSURE, 23:57
- Re: Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions, Timo Nieminen, 23:56
- a good online textbook, strings, 23:48
- Re: What are UFOs, strings, 23:47
- Re: Does time exist ?, strings, 23:44
- Re: What are UFOs, elson, 23:38
- Re: The quantum of light; How does it condensate?, xxein, 23:31
- Re: Does time exist ?, DBLEXPOSURE, 23:21
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, John C . Polasek, 23:03
- Re: What are UFOs, Schoenfeld, 22:58
- Re: Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions, PlanckQ, 22:56
- i wanna be a crackpot, strings, 22:41
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., Randy Poe, 22:31
- Re: What are UFOs, elson, 22:20
- Re: Does time exist ?, MorituriMax, 22:18
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 22:17
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, FrediFizzx, 22:13
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Paul Stowe, 22:12
- Diffraction Gratings versus Prisms, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- why don't certain things liquify?, metaperl, 21:58
- Uncle_Al, maybe you just need some R & R., Jeff_Relf, 21:53
- Re: Better then startrek, F Sutherland, 21:50
- Mark_Martin, What stresses were you going though when you caught that virus ?, Jeff_Relf, 21:49
- Re: PHYSICS LETTERS PAPER ON SUBQUARKS (3 subquarks = 1 quark, possible?), FrediFizzx, 21:45
- Re: The phuckwit "Uncle Al" doesn't know what escape velocity is!, Uncle Al, 21:44
- Re: I will not be using condoms., Uncle Al, 21:40
- Re: Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions, Uncle Al, 21:39
- Re: Does time exist ?, Uncle Al, 21:32
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 21:31
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Uncle Al, 21:31
- The relatively recent outbreak of immunodeficiency., Jeff_Relf, 21:26
- Re: I will not be using condoms., Rick, 21:19
- The quantum of light; How does it condensate?, Nick, 21:11
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, donstockbauer, 21:08
- Re: Does time exist ?, donstockbauer, 21:07
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Robert J. Kolker, 21:06
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 21:02
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Nick, 20:59
- Re: Does time exist ?, donstockbauer, 20:57
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 20:41
- Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes - "yes" it's possible today!, jimp, 20:40
- Re: I will not be using condoms., Rick, 20:22
- Re: I will not be using condoms., Mark Martin, 20:04
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Timo Nieminen, 20:02
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:58
- Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes - "yes" it's possible today!, Androcles, 19:55
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Nick, 19:54
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:53
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 19:47
- Re: Does time exist ?, dRaGko, 19:44
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, FrediFizzx, 19:43
- Re: PHYSICS LETTERS PAPER ON SUBQUARKS (3 subquarks = 1 quark, possible?), adron, 19:43
- Re: Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions, Timo Nieminen, 19:42
- Re: Does time exist ?, Nick, 19:30
- Re: Does time exist ?, DBLEXPOSURE, 19:25
- The Original Stillness of Creation; Time and the Singularity, Nick, 19:23
- Re: Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions, Androcles, 19:23
- Re: Does time exist ?, Steve Ralph, 19:17
- I know what I'm doing... suckers., Jeff_Relf, 19:16
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Steve Ralph, 19:14
- Re: Mark_Martin's proposals are _Beyond_ ridiculous because..., Mark Martin, 19:13
- Re: I will not be using condoms., Rick, 19:11
- Mark_Martin's proposals are _Beyond_ ridiculous because..., Jeff_Relf, 19:07
- The phuckwit "Uncle Al" doesn't know what escape velocity is!, Androcles, 19:07
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Don1, 19:02
- Re: I will not be using condoms., Mark Martin, 18:50
- Re: Does time exist ?, Sam Wormley, 18:49
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Fred Stevens, 18:47
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Don1, 18:37
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Steve Ralph, 18:30
- I will not be using condoms., Jeff_Relf, 18:24
- Re: The firefighters would arrive well after I was out of the house., Mark Martin, 18:12
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Don1, 18:09
- Prevention and Control of Hurricanes - "yes" it's possible today!, Hurricane Guy, 17:50
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Timo Nieminen, 17:49
- The firefighters would arrive well after I was out of the house., Jeff_Relf, 17:49
- Re: Expansion: A Force Greater than Gravity, Nick, 17:43
- Re: Does time exist ?, FrediFizzx, 17:39
- Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions, PlanckQ, 17:38
- Re: Expansion: A Force Greater than Gravity, FrediFizzx, 17:38
- Re: Does time exist ?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:36
- Does time exist ?, John Do, 17:16
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Androcles, 17:12
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 17:06
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, odin, 17:03
- Re: New Breathtaking Confirmation of Special Relativity, mmeron, 16:38
- Re: Bulletin: The Original Nuclear Nightmare, Wayne Brown, 16:37
- Re: The rules of Euclidean Physics, Jim Spriggs, 16:33
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 16:29
- Re: Do all object reach terminal velocity?, BEM, 16:23
- Gravity a POV, Nick, 16:20
- Re: Expansion: A Force Greater than Gravity, Mark Martin, 16:17
- Re: New Breathtaking Confirmation of Special Relativity, Timo Nieminen, 16:17
- The rules of Euclidean Physics, Don1, 16:17
- Re: Light wave, PD, 16:11
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, PD, 16:09
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Ken S. Tucker, 16:07
- Re: Expansion: A Force Greater than Gravity, Uncle Al, 16:03
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Mark Martin, 16:00
- Re: New Breathtaking Confirmation of Special Relativity, mmeron, 16:00
- Re: PHYSICS LETTERS PAPER ON SUBQUARKS (3 subquarks = 1 quark, possible?), Jay R. Yablon, 15:59
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Androcles, 15:49
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, Dave, 15:46
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 15:44
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, John C . Polasek, 15:42
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, mmeron, 15:41
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Androcles, 15:40
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 15:37
- Re: Light wave, Androcles, 15:34
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, Androcles, 15:34
- Re: New Breathtaking Confirmation of Special Relativity, Timo Nieminen, 15:33
- Re: Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., Douglas Eagleson, 15:26
- Re: Do all object reach terminal velocity?, Mark Martin, 15:25
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Timo Nieminen, 15:20
- Re: Light wave, Andy Resnick, 15:18
- Re: Do all object reach terminal velocity?, Sam Wormley, 15:17
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Androcles, 15:12
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Androcles, 15:11
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Mark Martin, 15:08
- Re: Do all object reach terminal velocity?, Order of the Solar Temple, 15:02
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Timo Nieminen, 15:02
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, PD, 15:00
- Expansion: A Force Greater than Gravity, Nick, 14:58
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, Robert J. Kolker, 14:57
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, PD, 14:53
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, PD, 14:51
- Do all object reach terminal velocity?, Michael Sherlock, 14:51
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Mark Martin, 14:50
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Androcles, 14:48
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, FrediFizzx, 14:46
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 14:45
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Mark Martin, 14:45
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:43
- Re: energy derived from differential specific gravities?, dave.harper, 14:42
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, PD, 14:39
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Androcles, 14:31
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, PD, 14:30
- Re: Mass vs Matter, DBLEXPOSURE, 14:28
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE Number 749 October 13, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe and Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 14:26
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, mmeron, 14:25
- Re: molecules move deterministically, Bernhard Kuemel, 14:23
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Ken Muldrew, 14:12
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, tadchem, 14:08
- Re: What are UFOs, donstockbauer, 14:06
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 14:01
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, tadchem, 13:55
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, PD, 13:53
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 13:34
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, John C . Polasek, 13:33
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:32
- Re: Mass vs Matter, DBLEXPOSURE, 13:29
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Androcles, 13:26
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Randy Poe, 13:25
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:18
- Re: Light wave, Androcles, 13:14
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:11
- Re: Rich people can be illiterate/crazy too., Mark Martin, 13:07
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:06
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, tj Frazir, 13:05
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 13:04
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Mark Fergerson, 13:01
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, tj Frazir, 12:59
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:58
- Re: What are UFOs, elson, 12:57
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Androcles, 12:55
- Re: Einstein, Maric, Political Correctness, Nova, PBS, hanson, 12:54
- Re: Light wave, Andy Resnick, 12:52
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, tj Frazir, 12:50
- Re: Mass vs Matter, briggs, 12:46
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Androcles, 12:45
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Uncle Al, 12:31
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Randy Poe, 12:31
- Re: Bulletin: The Original Nuclear Nightmare, Puppet_Sock, 12:25
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Mark Fergerson, 12:25
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Androcles, 12:24
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Randy Poe, 12:23
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, John C . Polasek, 12:16
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Don1, 12:09
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, A faint wind, blowing from World's End, 12:09
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., tj Frazir, 12:00
- Re: DARK travels FASTER than LiGHT.!! [With AFFiNE studded HUB GAPs].!!, Will Janoschka, 11:50
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., tj Frazir, 11:44
- Re: Shareware mechanics simulator?, JHD, 11:42
- Re: About a Ge-dinghy-n experiment (hint: pun), Happy Hippy, 11:40
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., tj Frazir, 11:29
- Re: What are UFOs, Happy Hippy, 11:28
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:26
- Re: Mass vs Matter, tadchem, 11:22
- Re: Mass vs Matter, DBLEXPOSURE, 11:20
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, tadchem, 11:15
- EC-funded Research Visits: Application Deadline 15/11/2005, europa, 11:12
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:11
- Re: Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:08
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, platopes, 11:07
- Re: Mass vs Matter, DBLEXPOSURE, 11:05
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:59
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:52
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Roger Conroy, 10:51
- Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Sam Wormley, 10:40
- "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Emor, 10:38
- Bulletin: The Original Nuclear Nightmare, Sam Wormley, 10:38
- Re: Eotvos - latest news., platopes, 10:36
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 10:34
- Re: Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., A . L ., 10:33
- Re: Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., A . L ., 10:31
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Sam Wormley, 10:27
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 10:27
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 10:26
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:02
- Re: Light wave, Randy Poe, 10:02
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 10:01
- Re: Light wave, Androcles, 09:45
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Robert J. Kolker, 09:27
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Randy Poe, 09:20
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 09:19
- Re: What are UFOs, jimp, 09:17
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 09:16
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Y.Porat, 08:43
- Re: Light wave, Andy Resnick, 08:42
- Re: Paper on relativity crankdom, Androcles, 08:23
- Re: Eotvos - latest news., Androcles, 08:12
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Androcles, 08:08
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 07:59
- About a Ge-dinghy-n experiment (hint: pun), Ian Macmillan, 07:52
- Re: Eotvos - latest news., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:49
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Androcles, 07:46
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Ian Parker, 07:43
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, Androcles, 07:35
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 07:32
- Eotvos - latest news., Androcles, 07:26
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 19.3: Not Complete Concordance in Quadric, john_ramsden, 07:20
- Re: When negative numbers are real, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:13
- Re: Protection from electromagnetic radiation, Richard Herring, 07:12
- Re: Sailing on air, jmfbahciv, 07:06
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 06:52
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Carl Parkes, 06:51
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 06:35
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, jmfbahciv, 06:31
- Re: What are UFOs, Michael Gray, 06:13
- Top Advisory Panel Warns of an Erosion of the U.S. Competitive Edge in Science, Jan Panteltje, 05:38
- Re: Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., Helmut Wabnig, 05:28
- Re: Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., makc . the . great, 04:51
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Harry, 04:19
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, CWatters, 04:06
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 03:51
- Re: On permittivity and permeability, FrediFizzx, 03:35
- Independent/Dependent Phases 20: Intersection of Sphere and Cone, OsherD, 03:27
- Re: molecules move deterministically, Y.Porat, 03:26
- On permittivity and permeability, Timo Nieminen, 02:58
- Re: Protection from electromagnetic radiation, Helmut Wabnig, 02:55
- Re: Dirac Strings & Weightless Warp Drive of ET Spacecraft, CM, 02:52
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Paul Stowe, 02:02
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Bob Cain, 01:04
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 19.3: Not Complete Concordance in Quadric, OsherD, 01:01
- Re: Mass vs Matter, DBLEXPOSURE, 00:56
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, MorituriMax, 00:47
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, MorituriMax, 00:46
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., Mark Martin, 00:45
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 19.3: Not Complete Concordance in Quadric, OsherD, 00:40
- Who's Afraid of a Solar Flare?, Sam Wormley, 00:23
- Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English., tj Frazir, 00:23
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 19.3: Not Complete Concordance in Quadric, OsherD, 00:21
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., David M. Palmer, 00:06
October 12, 2005
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, tj Frazir, 23:54
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, tj Frazir, 23:46
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 23:20
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, tj Frazir, 23:19
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Sam Wormley, 23:19
- Re: What are UFOs, Sam Wormley, 23:15
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Don1, 23:15
- Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Sam Wormley, 23:09
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, tj Frazir, 22:57
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, donstockbauer, 22:45
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, Don1, 22:42
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 19.3: Not Complete Concordance in Quadric, donstockbauer, 22:31
- Re: image processing technique - galaxies - abstract art, donstockbauer, 22:18
- Independent/Dependent Phases 19.3: Not Complete Concordance in Quadric, OsherD, 22:16
- Re: Mass vs Matter, DBLEXPOSURE, 22:15
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 22:10
- Re: The current state of physics (maths references), xxein, 21:47
- Re: What are UFOs, jimp, 21:29
- Re: What are UFOs, elson, 21:18
- Aluminum Bicycle Frames, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:16
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 20:26
- Re: What are UFOs, riplin, 20:05
- What causes immunodeficiency in rats., Jeff_Relf, 20:03
- image processing technique - galaxies - abstract art, Sam Wormley, 20:03
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Paul Stowe, 20:02
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Sam Wormley, 19:54
- Re: What are UFOs, Sam Wormley, 19:47
- Re: Rich people can be illiterate/crazy too., Dave Saurus, 19:45
- Re: Pardon me if I don't work for Martin or Bradley., Mark Martin, 19:43
- Re: What are UFOs, elson, 19:43
- Re: What are UFOs uniformed ing orleans, tj Frazir, 19:37
- Paper on relativity crankdom, Timo Nieminen, 19:35
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:35
- Re: What are UFOs, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:26
- Re: EMR Induces Electrical Current in Amalgam Fillings, tj Frazir, 19:25
- Re: Pardon me if I don't work for Martin or Bradley., T Wake, 19:14
- Re: An urgent message for Archimedes Plutonium, donstockbauer, 19:13
- Re: Show me carfully controlled studies of immunodeficient cats., T Wake, 19:13
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 19:10
- Re: Show me carfully controlled studies of immunodeficient cats., T Wake, 19:08
- An urgent message for Archimedes Plutonium, Ian St. John, 19:01
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Steve Ralph, 18:40
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, OG, 18:39
- Re: Protection from electromagnetic radiation, Sam Wormley, 18:02
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 19.2 Square Root of a Quadric, OsherD, 17:57
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Androcles, 17:54
- Re: Randy_Poe, Please provide the Message_ID., Randy Poe, 17:52
- Re: What are UFOs, John Sefton, 17:47
- Re: Protection from electromagnetic radiation, PD, 17:44
- Independent/Dependent Phases 19.2 Square Root of a Quadric, OsherD, 17:42
- Re: Protection from electromagnetic radiation, Dave, 17:23
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, dwickford, 17:21
- Rich people can be illiterate/crazy too., Jeff_Relf, 16:58
- Re: Show me carfully controlled studies of immunodeficient cats., donstockbauer, 16:46
- Re: Mass vs Matter, DBLEXPOSURE, 16:46
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases: PI as the Square Root of the General Quadratic/Affine or Conic, OsherD, 16:43
- Independent/Dependent Phases: PI as the Square Root of the General Quadratic/Affine or Conic, OsherD, 16:38
- Show me carfully controlled studies of immunodeficient cats., Jeff_Relf, 16:37
- Re: Accessing lost computer data via the Akashic Records, donstockbauer, 16:32
- Re: Light wave, donstockbauer, 16:28
- Accessing lost computer data via the Akashic Records, dunric, 16:27
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, donstockbauer, 16:22
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:22
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 16:20
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, G. R. L. Cowan, 16:18
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 16:15
- Randy_Poe, Please provide the Message_ID., Jeff_Relf, 16:13
- Re: Mass vs Matter, donstockbauer, 16:12
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Cardinal Chunder, 16:09
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, tadchem, 16:07
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 16:01
- Re: Shareware mechanics simulator?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:00
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:58
- Re: Pardon me if I don't work for Martin or Bradley., Jeff_Relf, 15:58
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:54
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, Richard Bell, 15:54
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 15:51
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 18.2: The Universe Discovers 0, 1, 2, 3, OsherD, 15:47
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, Richard Bell, 15:42
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 15:37
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Androcles, 15:37
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 18.2: The Universe Discovers 0, 1, 2, 3, OsherD, 15:35
- Independent/Dependent Phases 18.2: The Universe Discovers 0, 1, 2, 3, OsherD, 15:16
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 15:12
- Re: About a ge-dinghy-n experiment (hint: pun), Timo Nieminen, 15:11
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 15:00
- Re: What are UFOs, jimp, 14:58
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 14:53
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, T Wake, 14:51
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, tadchem, 14:50
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 14:50
- Re: Light wave, TomGee, 14:47
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, tadchem, 14:45
- Re: Light wave, TomGee, 14:41
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", PD, 14:33
- Re: What are UFOs, tadchem, 14:31
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Bilge, 14:18
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, Androcles, 14:09
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, bossel, 13:58
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Ross A. Finlayson, 13:56
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, bossel, 13:55
- Re: What are UFOs, Jor-El, 13:48
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Mark Martin, 13:48
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:47
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, Androcles, 13:31
- Re: molecules move deterministically, tadchem, 13:30
- Re: What are UFOs, PD, 13:30
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Jonathan Silverlight, 13:27
- Re: Light wave, PD, 13:25
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Sam Wormley, 13:22
- Re: Light wave, Doug Huffman, 13:21
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Androcles, 13:21
- Re: How height affects velocity, Order of the Solar Temple, 13:16
- Re: How height affects velocity, Uncle Al, 13:15
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Mike Combs, 13:13
- Re: Light wave, Sam Wormley, 13:12
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, Uncle Al, 13:06
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:05
- Re: How height affects velocity, PD, 13:02
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, StilllovingMarty, 13:01
- Re: What are UFOs, Uncle Al, 12:59
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, Andy Resnick, 12:57
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Uncle Al, 12:56
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, PD, 12:56
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 12:55
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Uncle Al, 12:55
- Re: Read before responding (was: How David Touretzky censored my website), StilllovingMarty, 12:52
- Re: How height affects velocity, Sam Wormley, 12:52
- Re: Read before responding (was: How David Touretzky censored my website), StilllovingMarty, 12:52
- Re: Light wave, Uncle Al, 12:51
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Sam Wormley, 12:45
- How height affects velocity, Michael Sherlock, 12:43
- Re: Sailing on air, mmeron, 12:42
- Re: What are UFOs, Sam Wormley, 12:41
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, mmeron, 12:40
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, TomGee, 12:36
- Re: Supplement to the paper on black holes, None, 12:36
- Re: Supplement to the paper on black holes, None, 12:35
- Re: molecules move deterministically, Y.Porat, 12:28
- Re: None have any but trivial choices., John Bailo, 12:22
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Androcles, 12:18
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, Bob Eldred, 12:17
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Harry, 12:11
- Read before responding (was: How David Touretzky censored my website), Richard Tobin, 12:11
- Re: How David Touretzky censored my website, Androcles, 12:10
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Androcles, 11:55
- How David Touretzky censored my website, Barbara Schwarz, 11:53
- Re: What are UFOs, ianparker2, 11:47
- Re: About a ge-dinghy-n experiment (hint: pun), tadchem, 11:38
- Re: What are UFOs, Schoenfeld, 11:32
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, tadchem, 11:30
- Re: What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 11:27
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Mike, 11:27
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, Eric Gisin, 11:20
- Re: What are UFOs, jimp, 11:11
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, tj Frazir, 11:07
- Re: PHYSICS HOMEWORK PROBLEM, Greg Neill, 11:01
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, TomGee, 10:59
- Re: molecules move deterministically, tadchem, 10:55
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Order of the Solar Temple, 10:55
- What are UFOs, Ian Parker, 10:52
- Re: Sailing on air, jimp, 10:45
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:40
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 10:39
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 10:39
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Androcles, 10:38
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:37
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 10:36
- Re: Mass vs Matter, TomGee, 10:34
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Androcles, 10:33
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Mike, 10:28
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 10:28
- Re: Light wave, PD, 10:24
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Mike, 10:24
- Re: PHYSICS HOMEWORK PROBLEM, PD, 10:22
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Don1, 10:20
- Re: Light wave, TomGee, 10:18
- Re: PHYSICS HOMEWORK PROBLEM, PD, 10:16
- Re: Robot cars finish DARPA Challenge, Traveler, 10:14
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 10:14
- Re: PHYSICS HOMEWORK PROBLEM, Puppet_Sock, 10:10
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 10:08
- Re: Light wave, Androcles, 09:56
- Independent/Dependent Phases 18: How the Universe Discovered 1, 2, sqrt(3), 3, OsherD, 09:54
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 09:33
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Mike, 09:29
- About a ge-dinghy-n experiment (hint: pun), Ian Macmillan, 09:26
- VELOCITY OF LIGHT IS AN ILLUSION, ACE, 09:26
- "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Emor, 09:05
- Re: Mass vs Matter, David Kastrup, 08:57
- Re: Mass vs Matter, PD, 08:49
- Re: Light wave, PD, 08:47
- PHYSICS HOMEWORK PROBLEM, jbgibson, 08:45
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, PD, 08:44
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, george, 08:39
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Orion, 08:36
- Re: Mass vs Matter, Orion, 08:36
- Re: Light wave, Andy Resnick, 08:31
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 08:26
- Mass vs Matter, Don1, 08:24
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, Dave, 08:18
- Re: ::::::::::::: Marriage In Ur Mind ::::::::::::::::::, donstockbauer, 08:06
- ::::::::::::: Marriage In Ur Mind ::::::::::::::::::, net4matrimonials, 07:57
- Re: energy derived from differential specific gravities?, Autymn D. C., 07:54
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Mark Fergerson, 07:48
- Re: Wormholes: Scientific Explanation of Manchester Airport Prediction, donstockbauer, 07:41
- Re: Hammond's SPOG SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEABLE, donstockbauer, 07:23
- molecules move deterministically, Bernhard Kuemel, 07:21
- Re: Sailing on air, donstockbauer, 07:18
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, donstockbauer, 07:12
- Re: Sailing on air, Richard Herring, 07:06
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 07:00
- Wormholes: Scientific Explanation of Manchester Airport Prediction, Wizard of Odd, 06:43
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, Richard Herring, 06:39
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, mmeron, 06:27
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, mmeron, 06:21
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, Richard Herring, 06:13
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 06:11
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 06:00
- Re: Sailing on air, jmfbahciv, 05:49
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, jmfbahciv, 05:44
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, Don Howe, 05:42
- Re: Sailing on air, jmfbahciv, 05:41
- Re: Sailing on air, jmfbahciv, 05:33
- Re: OT What happened to sci.physics.research?, jmfbahciv, 05:21
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, jmfbahciv, 05:13
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:10
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Schoenfeld, 05:01
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, liberti, 04:48
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:39
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, strings, 04:36
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, strings, 04:33
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, strings, 04:32
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, Nosterill, 04:10
- Re: llocalised photon vs. non-localised wave?, Harry, 04:05
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, hanson, 03:46
- Re: Physicists in France have demonstrated the Hall effect with phonons, MorituriMax, 03:43
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, FrediFizzx, 03:40
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, MorituriMax, 03:39
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, FrediFizzx, 03:36
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, MorituriMax, 03:33
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, TomGee, 03:16
- Science, Technology, the DARPA Challenge, hanson, 03:08
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Bob Cain, 02:48
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, Bob Cain, 02:33
- Re: curved space?, Y.Porat, 02:30
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Bob Cain, 02:24
- Re: charge-pair why not?, Happy Hippy, 02:24
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, RP, 02:01
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Golden Boar, 01:58
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Golden Boar, 01:54
- Shareware mechanics simulator?, JHD, 01:46
- Re: Light wave, Androcles, 01:40
- I think I can help some people., Jeff_Relf, 01:26
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, FrediFizzx, 01:25
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Schoenfeld, 01:01
- Re: Light wave, Sam Wormley, 00:59
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, RP, 00:52
- Re: Light wave, gmarkowsky, 00:45
- Re: Physicists in France have demonstrated the Hall effect with phonons, RP, 00:14
- Re: Light wave, Sam Wormley, 00:10
October 11, 2005
- None have any but trivial choices., Jeff_Relf, 23:52
- Re: OT What happened to sci.physics.research?, john_ramsden, 23:46
- Light wave, gmarkowsky, 23:38
- Light wave, gmarkowsky, 23:38
- OT What happened to sci.physics.research?, himog, 23:32
- How safe is liquid oxygen ?, Jeff_Relf, 23:18
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, jowr . pi, 23:16
- Re: The apple didn't fall far from the tree., donstockbauer, 23:14
- The apple didn't fall far from the tree., Jeff_Relf, 22:56
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 22:54
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, donstockbauer, 22:41
- Re: alt.local.village.idiot,alt.morons,sci.physics.relativity, donstockbauer, 22:37
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, mountain man, 22:33
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Golden Boar, 22:22
- Re: Physicists in France have demonstrated the Hall effect with phonons, mmeron, 22:20
- Physicists in France have demonstrated the Hall effect with phonons, Sam Wormley, 22:14
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Golden Boar, 21:32
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, Eric Gisse, 21:27
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, Don1, 21:17
- Re: The current state of physics (maths references), Bill Hobba, 21:08
- Re: Robot cars finish DARPA Challenge, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 21:05
- Re: Robot cars finish DARPA Challenge, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 21:05
- Re: The curent state of physics, john_ramsden, 21:03
- Re: The current state of physics (maths references), john_ramsden, 20:39
- Java is Used to Write a Compiler- for the first time., Douglas Eagleson, 20:34
- Re: Article: Analysis of the gravitational signals from a newly discovered Kardashev II civilization in the Sombrero Galaxy, Robert Karl Stonjek, 20:19
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Golden Boar, 20:15
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 20:07
- Re: Warped Passages & Macroscopic Hidden Dimensions, FrediFizzx, 20:07
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, Androcles, 20:03
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Paul Stowe, 20:00
- Re: Robot cars finish DARPA Challenge, Traveler, 19:52
- Re: FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, Uncle Al, 19:45
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, Uncle Al, 19:43
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, tj Frazir, 19:37
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, Richard Tobin, 19:19
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 19:08
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 19:05
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:04
- Re: IC packaging, donstockbauer, 18:58
- Re: Warped Passages & Macroscopic Hidden Dimensions, epsilon, 18:39
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Mark Martin, 18:18
- Re: Six lane underground rail lines, jimp, 18:15
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, Androcles, 18:04
- FREE ENERGY Inventions and Technology, rem460, 18:01
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Al Zenner, 17:56
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, Sam Wormley, 17:43
- Re: [OT] DVDs going up the spout - Another reason to quit smoking, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:35
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, John Velman, 17:31
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, Randy Poe, 17:30
- Re: How big is the concrete block?, Greg Neill, 17:25
- Re: Robot cars finish DARPA Challenge, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 17:06
- How big is the concrete block?, JMosey, 17:06
- Re: curved space?, Orion, 16:59
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 16:48
- Robot cars finish DARPA Challenge, Randy Poe, 16:33
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bill Hobba, 16:29
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, PD, 16:25
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 16:21
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Sam Wormley, 16:18
- Re: Heat equation, confusing boundary conditions?, Robert Israel, 16:18
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, Don1, 16:02
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 15:11
- Re: KILLFILE NOTICE, platopes, 15:10
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Al Zenner, 14:50
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, odin, 14:48
- Re: DVDs going up the spout - Another reason to quit smoking, Paul Cardinale, 14:48
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Roger Conroy, 14:47
- Re: IC packaging, Uncle Al, 14:46
- Re: llocalised photon vs. non-localised wave?, Jan Panteltje, 14:45
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, Uncle Al, 14:44
- Re: DVDs going up the spout - Another reason to quit smoking, Jan Panteltje, 14:44
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, Uncle Al, 14:41
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Al Zenner, 14:40
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:35
- Re: Warped Passages & Macroscopic Hidden Dimensions, Uncle Al, 14:31
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Androcles, 14:21
- Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", jimp, 14:16
- Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Sam Wormley, 14:03
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:00
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Golden Boar, 14:00
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, John C . Polasek, 13:52
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 13:39
- "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Emor, 13:29
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Traveler, 13:25
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 13:18
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 13:17
- Re: Just a millimeter, Sam Wormley, 13:09
- Re: IC packaging, Helmut Wabnig, 13:09
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, odin, 13:01
- Gravity Probe B Wraps Up Observations, Sam Wormley, 12:59
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Androcles, 12:57
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 12:56
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, Mark Fergerson, 12:51
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Mark Fergerson, 12:47
- Re: Just a millimeter, Sam Wormley, 12:43
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Harry, 12:38
- Re: Sailing on air, mmeron, 12:35
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 12:34
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Mark Fergerson, 12:34
- Tonight -- NOVA: Einstein's Big Idea, Sam Wormley, 12:28
- Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler, Mark Fergerson, 12:22
- Re: IC packaging, Androcles, 12:19
- Re: IC packaging, rge11x, 12:15
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 12:12
- Re: Just a millimeter, Sam Wormley, 12:12
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, john_ramsden, 12:12
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Al Zenner, 12:03
- Re: IC packaging, Sam Wormley, 12:00
- Re: Sailing on air BUSTED by kite, tj Frazir, 11:59
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, PD, 11:58
- IC packaging, time, 11:53
- Re: Sailing on air BUSTED by kite, tj Frazir, 11:52
- Re: Sailing on air BUSTED by kite, Mark Martin, 11:51
- Re: Sailing on air, Mark Fergerson, 11:43
- Re: Sailing on air, Richard Herring, 11:37
- Re: Sailing on air BUSTED by kite, Mark Fergerson, 11:35
- Re: basic 2D vector question, John C . Polasek, 11:35
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Mark Fergerson, 11:32
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Igor, 11:29
- Re: Sailing on air, Mark Martin, 11:23
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, tadchem, 11:22
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 11:22
- Re: An alternate explanation of E=mc^2, John C . Polasek, 11:19
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 11:15
- Re: Sailing on air, jimp, 11:10
- Re: Quantum Entanglement Illustrated, Harry, 11:04
- Re: Matter, space & time, TomGee, 11:01
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Happy Hippy, 10:59
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Sam Wormley, 10:57
- Re: Matter, space & time, Order of the Solar Temple, 10:53
- Re: Sailing on air BUSTED by kite, Mark Martin, 10:51
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, Richard Herring, 10:51
- Re: Sailing on air clamp kite glider, tj Frazir, 10:45
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, Bruce Scott TOK, 10:44
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, John C . Polasek, 10:43
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, briggs, 10:39
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., christopher.secord@xxxxxxxxx, 10:35
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, Happy Hippy, 10:35
- Re: Sailing on air BUSTED by kite, tj Frazir, 10:33
- Re: Sailing on air, tj Frazir, 10:28
- GRAVITY AND THE PHOTON, ACE, 10:27
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, Mark Martin, 10:26
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, sobering@xxxxxxxxx, 10:20
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., surrealistic-dream, 10:17
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, Helmut Wabnig, 10:15
- Re: Sailing on air, Richard Herring, 10:15
- Independent/Dependent Phases 16: Phases of Phases, OsherD, 10:13
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 10:02
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 09:58
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 15: Interdisciplinary, OsherD, 09:50
- De Gennes Scandal - now with documents!!, jimal1971, 09:48
- Matter, space & time, Don1, 09:47
- Re: Sailing on air, jmfbahciv, 09:38
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, jmfbahciv, 09:32
- Independent/Dependent Phases 15: Interdisciplinary, OsherD, 09:27
- Re: Quantum Entanglement Illustrated, john_ramsden, 09:13
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, PD, 09:09
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 14.1: 1, 2, sqrt 3 in Generalized Isoperimetric, OsherD, 09:06
- Independent/Dependent Phases 14.1: 1, 2, sqrt 3 in Generalized Isoperimetric, OsherD, 08:58
- Re: DVDs going up the spout - Another reason to quit smoking, john_ramsden, 08:52
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, shanefield, 08:48
- Re: curved space?, Mike, 08:41
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, donstockbauer, 08:31
- Re: Quantum Entanglement Illustrated - my refs, Harry, 08:31
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, donstockbauer, 08:26
- Re: Quantum Entanglement Illustrated, TomGee, 08:24
- Re: A Gedinghyn experiment, donstockbauer, 08:24
- A Gedinghyn experiment, Ian Macmillan, 08:23
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, John Christiansen, 08:23
- Re: Quantum Entanglement Illustrated, donstockbauer, 08:19
- Re: Sailing on air, jmfbahciv, 08:10
- Re: Browse your gothic lovers' photos and chat with them online!, donstockbauer, 08:02
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, donstockbauer, 07:52
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Lloyd Parker, 07:32
- Re: Sailing on air, Richard Herring, 07:28
- Quantum Entanglement Illustrated, Dave Jarvis, 07:18
- Browse your gothic lovers' photos and chat with them online!, sweatheart, 06:56
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Al Zenner, 06:30
- Re: DVDs going up the spout - Another reason to quit smoking, Jan Panteltje, 06:29
- Re: The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 06:20
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, MorituriMax, 05:50
- The x, y, and z of Euclidean space, Don1, 05:07
- Re: When negative numbers are real, Androcles, 05:03
- DVDs going up the spout - Another reason to quit smoking, john_ramsden, 04:58
- Re: Warped Passages & Macroscopic Hidden Dimensions, epsilon, 04:47
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, Nosterill, 04:41
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bilge, 04:32
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, platopes, 04:17
- Re: When negative numbers are real, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:11
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, Kadaitcha Man, 04:06
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, Kantdatecha Man, 03:55
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, Kantdatecha Man, 03:45
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, platopes, 03:41
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Androcles, 03:35
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, Kadaitcha Man, 03:35
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 14: Generalized Isoperimetric Inequalities, OsherD, 03:33
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, platopes, 03:33
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Androcles, 03:31
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, Kadaitcha Man, 03:26
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, platopes, 03:22
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 14: Generalized Isoperimetric Inequalities, OsherD, 03:10
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, Kadaitcha Man, 03:09
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, platopes, 02:55
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, Kadaitcha Man, 02:49
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 14: Generalized Isoperimetric Inequalities, OsherD, 02:40
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, platopes, 02:36
- Re: curved space?, Y.Porat, 02:29
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 14: Generalized Isoperimetric Inequalities, OsherD, 02:23
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, platopes, 02:22
- Re: Warped Passages & Macroscopic Hidden Dimensions, FrediFizzx, 01:53
- Independent/Dependent Phases 14: Generalized Isoperimetric Inequalities, OsherD, 01:41
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Schoenfeld, 01:25
- Re: Heat equation, confusing boundary conditions?, N . Jankowski . groups, 01:22
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 01:19
- Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies, OsherD, 01:02
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 00:53
October 10, 2005
- Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies, Orion, 23:59
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 23:51
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 23:48
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, epsilon, 23:40
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:36
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:35
- Warped Passages & Macroscopic Hidden Dimensions, epsilon, 23:34
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 23:33
- Re: Heat equation, confusing boundary conditions?, mmeron, 23:29
- Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, newedana, 23:29
- Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 23:27
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Schoenfeld, 23:22
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Al Zenner, 23:22
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 23:20
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 22:50
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, mmeron, 22:44
- Re: Increasingly, judges decide what science--if any--a jury hears, donstockbauer, 22:37
- Re: When negative numbers are real, donstockbauer, 22:33
- Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", donstockbauer, 22:30
- Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies, OsherD, 22:29
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, donstockbauer, 22:22
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 22:19
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, donstockbauer, 22:18
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, newedana, 22:12
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Al Zenner, 21:35
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, bill, 21:31
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:28
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Michael Gray, 21:27
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Michael Gray, 21:24
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:24
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 21:11
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:07
- Re: I'm being evicted for overcrowding., tj Frazir, 21:06
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Robert J. Kolker, 21:02
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, tj Frazir, 21:01
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Timo Nieminen, 20:45
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Igor, 20:35
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, Eric Gisse, 20:29
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, janey3white, 20:06
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Thomas Johnson, 20:06
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken S. Tucker, 20:00
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Androcles, 19:59
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, T Wake, 19:58
- Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate., T Wake, 19:57
- Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate., T Wake, 19:57
- Re: Rich women in a rich society don't have to be so loyal., T Wake, 19:55
- Re: Drawing the line somewhere., T Wake, 19:47
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Mark Martin, 19:45
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bill Hobba, 19:42
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken S. Tucker, 19:36
- Re: What if ?, jimp, 19:32
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bill Hobba, 19:25
- Re: Incredible, EugeniuszW, 19:22
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, Don1, 19:14
- Re: I'm being evicted for overcrowding., John Bailo, 19:10
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bill Hobba, 19:07
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:04
- Re: I'm being evicted for overcrowding., hanson, 18:52
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 18:51
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 18:47
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Androcles, 18:39
- Article: Solids that can pass through solids, Robert Karl Stonjek, 18:35
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Dave, 18:31
- Re: The Mass Media Conspiracy, edconrad, 18:29
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Traveler, 18:06
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken S. Tucker, 18:04
- Re: Dirac Strings & Weightless Warp Drive of ET Spacecraft, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:50
- Re: Gravity Light, Light Gravity, Androcles, 17:43
- Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:42
- I'm being evicted for overcrowding., Jeff_Relf, 17:37
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Androcles, 17:33
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken S. Tucker, 17:29
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, shanefield, 17:20
- Re: Gravity Light, Light Gravity, Pille, 17:17
- Re: Unbound particles and energy, Bilge, 17:11
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, PD, 17:11
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, shanefield, 17:07
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., raphfrk, 16:57
- Re: Thrust, Don1, 16:57
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Thomas Johnson, 16:56
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, Don1, 16:48
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 16:11
- Re: Density, James Copeland, 16:07
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, donstockbauer, 16:05
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 16:00
- Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE, donstockbauer, 15:56
- Re: Incredible, EugeniuszW, 15:56
- Re: Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 15:53
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, donstockbauer, 15:53
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 15:32
- Re: Consider the electron as a union of two halves!!, Paul Cardinale, 15:30
- Re: Just a millimeter, Sam Wormley, 15:28
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:22
- Re: a question about juggler, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:13
- Re: a question about juggler, Mike, 15:09
- Re: a question about juggler, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:08
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 15:02
- Re: a question about juggler, Mike, 14:57
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Roger Conroy, 14:48
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, markwh04, 14:43
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Roger Conroy, 14:42
- Re: To be loser, to help the unfavored... because I can., John Bailo, 14:34
- Just a millimeter, Hero . van . Jindelt, 14:32
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Art Deco, 14:30
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, donstockbauer, 14:30
- Re: a question about juggler, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:29
- Re: curved space?, markwh04, 14:26
- Re: Sailing on air, donstockbauer, 14:24
- Re: Sailing on air, markwh04, 14:19
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, riplin, 14:17
- Re: Infinity Problems in QM, markwh04, 14:16
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, odin, 14:11
- Re: The curent state of physics, markwh04, 14:10
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, PD, 14:09
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, Don1, 14:02
- Re: Thrust, Androcles, 13:51
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 13:46
- Re: a question about juggler, Ken S. Tucker, 13:39
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Painius, 13:39
- Re: Elementary particles have exact charge and mass (part 2)!!, Mark Martin, 13:37
- Re: Thrust, tj Frazir, 13:37
- Re: Thrust, CWatters, 13:34
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Mark Martin, 13:34
- Re: Density, PD, 13:32
- Re: Hanging Phuckwit Duck, PD, 13:30
- Re: Thrust, CWatters, 13:25
- Re: Density, Don1, 13:19
- Re: a question about juggler, comtech, 13:19
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Ken S. Tucker, 13:18
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, PD, 13:13
- Re: Thrust prehot bells from hell., tj Frazir, 13:08
- Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Uncle Al, 13:03
- Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Uncle Al, 13:02
- Re: Elementary particles have exact charge and mass (part 2)!!, Uncle Al, 12:59
- Re: Thrust, tj Frazir, 12:57
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Greysky, 12:32
- Re: Rich women in a rich society don't have to be so loyal., Mark Martin, 12:26
- Re: light moving slower, Hero . van . Jindelt, 12:26
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Jim McCauley, 12:06
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 11:49
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Androcles, 11:48
- Re: Motion, stephen, 11:40
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 11:34
- Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Sam Wormley, 11:31
- Re: a question about juggler, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:29
- Re: Motion, Torkel Franzen, 11:26
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 11:23
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, shanefield, 11:21
- Rich women in a rich society don't have to be so loyal., Jeff_Relf, 11:19
- "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Emor, 11:19
- "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Emor, 11:18
- "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Emor, 11:18
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 11:11
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Tom Roberts, 10:39
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Cardinal Chunder, 10:38
- Re: A Brief History of Science and Mechanics in the West, Lester Zick, 10:25
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 10:17
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Androcles, 10:08
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 10:06
- Re: Unbound particles and energy, Sue..., 10:05
- Re: Density, PD, 10:03
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 10:02
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Attila the Bum, 09:59
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 09:58
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, PD, 09:58
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 09:39
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Cardinal Chunder, 09:39
- To be loser, to help the unfavored... because I can., Jeff_Relf, 09:37
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 09:28
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Ian Parker, 09:11
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:08
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 09:06
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, shanefield, 09:05
- Re: Thrust, Don1, 09:03
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 09:01
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 08:39
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Androcles, 08:37
- Re: The curent state of physics, Androcles, 08:34
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., donstockbauer, 08:16
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 08:14
- Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies, donstockbauer, 08:06
- Re: Elementary particles have exact charge and mass (part 2)!!, donstockbauer, 07:47
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, donstockbauer, 07:45
- Re: Elementary particles have exact charge and mass (part 2)!!, donstockbauer, 07:36
- Re: Consider the electron as a union of two halves!!, donstockbauer, 07:31
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, jmfbahciv, 07:28
- Elementary particles have exact charge and mass (part 2)!!, dedanoe, 07:26
- Re: Thrust, tadchem, 07:25
- Consider the electron as a union of two halves!!, dedanoe, 07:25
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 07:11
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, TomGee, 06:43
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 06:29
- New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, October 10, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:36
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 05:11
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bilge, 05:04
- Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, Y.Porat, 04:52
- Independent/Dependent Phases 13.2: Levy Concentration Function, OsherD, 03:56
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 13.1 References on Levy Concentration Measure, OsherD, 03:38
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, dividby0, 03:28
- Re: a question about juggler, comtech, 03:03
- You might want to change the thread title to: "Pentcho Valev, tries to justify his lack of physics education", donstockbauer, 02:57
- Independent/Dependent Phases 13.1 References on Levy Concentration Measure, OsherD, 02:52
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, donstockbauer, 02:52
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, schoenfeld1, 02:16
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 02:14
- Independent/Dependent Phases 13: Levy Concentration Measure, OsherD, 02:12
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 02:05
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bilge, 02:03
- Drawing the line somewhere., Jeff_Relf, 02:00
- Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies, OsherD, 01:52
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, franklinhu, 01:51
- Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, tj Frazir, 01:41
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Thomas Johnson, 01:38
- The selfless life., Jeff_Relf, 01:30
- Re: Incredible, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?, Jeff_Relf, 00:57
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, FrediFizzx, 00:42
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 00:37
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 00:20
October 09, 2005
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, hhc314, 23:52
- Re: Gravity Light, Light Gravity, Sam Wormley, 23:49
- Re: charge-pair why not?, FrediFizzx, 23:47
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, donstockbauer, 23:46
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, donstockbauer, 23:44
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, hhc314, 23:40
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Tom Roberts, 23:19
- Re: The curent state of physics, donstockbauer, 23:18
- Re: Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity, donstockbauer, 23:05
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 22:51
- Re: heat pde proof, Eric Gisse, 22:48
- Re: heat pde proof, Eric Gisse, 22:39
- Re: Thrust mock 2 water rocket, tj Frazir, 22:31
- Re: Thrust, tj Frazir, 22:21
- Re: Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 22:07
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Gregory L. Hansen, 22:06
- Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 22:04
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., platopes, 21:58
- Re: Siphons, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 21:54
- Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate., tj Frazir, 21:46
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Thomas Johnson, 21:46
- Re: Unbound particles and energy, platopes, 21:45
- Re: Gravity Light, Light Gravity, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 21:44
- Re: The curent state of physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:38
- Re: Thrust, tj Frazir, 21:33
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:30
- Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate., tj Frazir, 21:27
- Gravity Light, Light Gravity, baramos, 21:27
- Re: heat pde proof, donstockbauer, 21:24
- Re: A Brief History of Science and Mechanics in the West, Just Playing, 21:18
- Re: Incredible, donstockbauer, 21:14
- Re: Thrust, tj Frazir, 21:01
- Re: Thrust, tj Frazir, 21:01
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Gregory L. Hansen, 20:30
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, shanefield, 19:52
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:34
- Re: Thrust, Don1, 19:30
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 19:23
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:18
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Androcles, 19:17
- Re: Thrust, Mike, 19:16
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 19:14
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 19:09
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Mike, 19:03
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Sam Wormley, 18:57
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 18:51
- Re: Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier, donstockbauer, 18:44
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, JamesMBrust, 18:43
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., donstockbauer, 18:41
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Tom Roberts, 18:39
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 18:32
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, donstockbauer, 18:24
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 18:16
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Odysseus, 18:12
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bill Hobba, 18:09
- Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?, donstockbauer, 18:08
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Uncle Al, 18:07
- Re: Getting students interested in physics, Uncle Al, 18:07
- Re: charge-pair why not?, Uncle Al, 18:03
- Re: Thrust, Uncle Al, 18:02
- Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Uncle Al, 18:02
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Timo Nieminen, 17:52
- Re: Temperatures needed to blow up the earth., Uncle Al, 17:52
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Bob Day, 17:51
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 17:49
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 17:45
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Paul Stowe, 17:44
- heat pde proof, vsgdp, 17:40
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, john_ramsden, 17:40
- Re: Incredible, EugeniuszW, 17:39
- Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science, Brad Guth, 17:38
- Re: Siphons, Steven Gray, 17:28
- Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science, Brad Guth, 17:25
- Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?, Mark Martin, 17:20
- Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?, Sam Wormley, 17:16
- Why is there something instead of nothing?, xyzer, 17:12
- Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?, donstockbauer, 17:09
- Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science, Brad Guth, 17:02
- Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?, Mark-T, 16:58
- Re: A Brief History of Science and Mechanics in the West, Lester Zick, 16:56
- Re: light moving slower, Jan Panteltje, 16:41
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Thomas Johnson, 16:35
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Virgil, 16:22
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 16:16
- Re: Free fall, Brad Guth, 16:16
- Re: Sailing on air, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:14
- Infinity Problems in QM, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 16:09
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 16:08
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Timo Nieminen, 15:50
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 15:47
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 15:36
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 15:26
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., David Kastrup, 15:21
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 15:17
- Getting students interested in physics, shanefield, 15:09
- Re: Temperatures needed to blow up the earth., mike3, 15:05
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 15:03
- Re: light moving slower, Hero . van . Jindelt, 15:02
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 14:44
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 14:30
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 14:19
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:17
- Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate., T Wake, 14:04
- Re: light moving slower, Jan Panteltje, 13:54
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 13:47
- Re: Sadly, Chris_V's _Plonks_ are amoung his greatest contributions..., tj Frazir, 13:35
- Re: Sadly, Chris_V's _Plonks_ are amoung his greatest contributions..., tj Frazir, 13:17
- Re: Am I softy or what ? stupid wake and morons, tj Frazir, 13:01
- Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier, jimp, 12:57
- Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate., tj Frazir, 12:48
- Re: A very young, very invisible culture., donstockbauer, 12:46
- Re: A Brief History of Science and Mechanics in the West, Rhong Dhong, 12:42
- Re: A very young, very invisible culture., T Wake, 12:38
- Re: charge-pair why not?, Sam Wormley, 12:36
- Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate., tj Frazir, 12:32
- charge-pair why not?, Happy Hippy, 12:27
- Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Sam Wormley, 12:16
- Re: Sailing on air, Doug Huffman, 12:11
- Re: light moving slower, Hero . van . Jindelt, 12:08
- Re: Sailing on air, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 11:58
- Re: Light independent orientation (Lio), Hero . van . Jindelt, 11:53
- Re: The neutron and the binary logical paradox!!, donstockbauer, 11:42
- "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Gnah, 11:35
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 11:15
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 11:08
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 11:08
- Re: Sailing on air, Doug Huffman, 10:56
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 10:45
- Re: Sailing on air, Androcles, 10:33
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 10:32
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 10:13
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 10:09
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 10:03
- The neutron and the binary logical paradox!!, dedanoe, 10:03
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Roger Conroy, 09:58
- Re: Sadly, Chris_V's _Plonks_ are amoung his greatest contributions here., Androcles, 09:48
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 09:35
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 09:26
- Re: Unbound particles and energy, Golden Boar, 09:18
- Re: Thrust, Don1, 09:10
- Re: Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity, john_ramsden, 08:49
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 08:10
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 07:53
- Re: Thrust, Don1, 07:53
- Re: Thrust, Don1, 07:50
- Electric Glider, Ian Macmillan, 07:32
- Re: Dirac Strings & Weightless Warp Drive of ET Spacecraft, john_ramsden, 07:08
- Re: Dirac Strings & Weightless Warp Drive of ET Spacecraft, donstockbauer, 07:00
- Re: Dirac Strings & Weightless Warp Drive of ET Spacecraft, niceguy, 06:52
- Re: Motion, donstockbauer, 06:42
- Re: curved space?, john_ramsden, 06:41
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 05:53
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 05:39
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 05:35
- Re: Thrust, CWatters, 05:09
- Re: Thrust, CWatters, 05:03
- Re: Google goofs!, chubbchubbs, 05:02
- Re: Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 04:44
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, brian a m stuckless, 04:35
- Re: Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity, Tice with a J, 03:10
- Re: Article: A large population of galaxies 9 to 12 billion years back in the history of the Universe (HTML), jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:58
- Google goofs!, tdp1001, 02:01
- Re: curved space?, Y.Porat, 01:57
- A very young, very invisible culture., Jeff_Relf, 01:36
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 01:03
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, franklinhu, 01:00
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Rod Ryker, 00:20
- Re: Unbound particles and energy, Sue..., 00:18
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 00:16
October 08, 2005
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 23:31
- Re: Thrust, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: What holds the world together?, donstockbauer, 22:45
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, Don1, 22:21
- A composite EM, weak and strong nuclear self-field theory, tony fleming, 22:12
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Bill Gray, 22:12
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Tom Roberts, 22:08
- Re: Am I softy or what ?, Mark Martin, 22:03
- Re: Thrust, Don1, 21:53
- Re: Pardon me if I don't work for Martin or Bradley., Mark Martin, 21:51
- Re: Endless debate, john_ramsden, 21:39
- Re: Thrust, donstockbauer, 21:35
- Re: Thrust, odin, 21:32
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Rod Ryker, 21:31
- Thrust, Don1, 21:30
- Re: Sadly, Chris_V's _Plonks_ are amoung his greatest contributions here., Gregory L. Hansen, 21:26
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Gregory L. Hansen, 21:13
- Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science, Brad Guth, 21:10
- Re: Sailing on air, Sam Wormley, 21:01
- Re: Temperatures needed to blow up the earth., The Ghost In The Machine, 21:00
- Re: Homes after Katrina, The Ghost In The Machine, 21:00
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 20:59
- Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, T Wake, 20:53
- Re: Siphons, PD, 20:53
- Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate., T Wake, 20:51
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 20:51
- Re: Pardon me if I don't work for Martin or Bradley., T Wake, 20:51
- Re: Am I softy or what ?, T Wake, 20:50
- Re: Motion, platopes, 20:48
- Re: Endless debate, mountain man, 20:39
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 20:35
- Re: What holds the world together?, Bob Cain, 20:23
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Tom Roberts, 20:02
- Re: Free fall, Brad Guth, 19:56
- Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate., tj Frazir, 19:53
- Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science, Brad Guth, 19:40
- Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science, Brad Guth, 19:33
- Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies, Happy Hippy, 19:12
- Clarification of Section Numbering in Independent Sections 10 and 12, OsherD, 19:01
- Re: Homes after Katrina, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:38
- Independent/Dependent Phases 12.3: PI Transformation of SR, OsherD, 18:37
- Re: Free fall, Brad Guth, 18:30
- Re: What holds the world together?, GQrivy, 18:24
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bill Hobba, 18:23
- Re: What holds the world together?, Robert J. Kolker, 18:14
- Re: What holds the world together?, Jor-El, 18:14
- Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity, amit, 17:56
- Re: Sailing on air, Doug Huffman, 17:55
- Re: What holds the world together?, Mike, 17:43
- Sailing on air, narf968, 17:41
- Re: PHOTONS and SR, Paul Cardinale, 17:36
- Re: Temperatures needed to blow up the earth., donstockbauer, 17:34
- Re: curved space?, Henry Haapalainen, 17:28
- Re: What holds the world together?, Jan Panteltje, 17:20
- Re: Homes after Katrina, Androcles, 17:11
- Re: curved space?, Androcles, 17:08
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 17:05
- Temperatures needed to blow up the earth., mike3, 17:01
- Re: A global role for physics, donstockbauer, 16:50
- Re: What holds the world together?, GQrivy, 16:34
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, tadchem, 16:31
- Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies, OsherD, 16:28
- Re: Free fall, John Christiansen, 16:25
- Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies, OsherD, 16:24
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, markwh04, 16:21
- Re: Free fall, Brad Guth, 16:08
- Independent/Dependent Phases 10.2: Special Relativity 3, OsherD, 16:05
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Thomas Johnson, 15:55
- Impacting the moon for sport of science, Brad Guth, 15:54
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 15:45
- Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
- Re: Homes after Katrina, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
- Re: One Step Away From Revealing If Einstein Was Right [again], hanson, 14:50
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Sue..., 14:45
- Lecture 9 on Alien ET Weapons Super-Technology, Jack Sarfatti, 14:39
- Re: a question about juggler, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:37
- Re: curved space?, Sam Wormley, 14:11
- curved space?, drewmaps, 14:07
- Re: a question about juggler, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: What holds the world together?, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: Express quantities of force and mass in weight units; not inertia units:, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: What holds the world together?, Robert J. Kolker, 13:59
- Re: a question about juggler, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:55
- Re: A global role for physics, Robert J. Kolker, 13:50
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 13:46
- Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Sam Wormley, 13:42
- One Step Away From Revealing If Einstein Was Right [again], Sam Wormley, 13:41
- Re: a question about juggler, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:41
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 10.1: Special Relativity 2, OsherD, 13:34
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 10.1: Special Relativity 2, OsherD, 13:30
- Re: What holds the world together?, Robert J. Kolker, 13:26
- Re: a question about juggler, Mike, 13:22
- Re: Fractal String Theory - The saga continues ;-), Happy Hippy, 13:16
- Dirac Strings & Weightless Warp Drive of ET Spacecraft, Jack Sarfatti, 12:57
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Paul Stowe, 12:51
- Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Uncle Al, 12:46
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, donstockbauer, 12:45
- Re: When negative numbers are real, donstockbauer, 12:42
- Re: When negative numbers are real, donstockbauer, 12:40
- Re: PHOTONS and SR, Uncle Al, 12:32
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Happy Hippy, 12:29
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 12:29
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, Uncle Al, 12:25
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Attila the Bum, 12:25
- Independent/Dependent Phases 10.1: Special Relativity 2, OsherD, 12:18
- Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes, jimp, 12:17
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Attila the Bum, 12:11
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 12:09
- Re: a question about juggler, Phil Holman, 12:05
- Re: What holds the world together?, Mike, 11:58
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Bilge, 11:57
- Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate., Jeff_Relf, 11:17
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, operator jay, 11:07
- Every corp. needs a good CPO like me., Jeff_Relf, 10:49
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Art Deco, 10:22
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, donstockbauer, 10:16
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 10:11
- Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate., donstockbauer, 10:04
- Re: What holds the world together?, donstockbauer, 10:01
- Re: What holds the world together?, mmeron, 09:53
- Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate., hanson, 09:45
- Re: What holds the world together?, abe . buckingham, 09:44
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 09:29
- Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, hanson, 09:21
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 09:19
- "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Gnah, 09:12
- Re: Homes after Katrina, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:43
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Michael Baldwin Bruce, 08:39
- Re: Express quantities of force and mass in weight units; not inertia units:, Don1, 08:38
- Re: What holds the world together?, Robert J. Kolker, 08:29
- Re: The curent state of physics, Mike Speed, 08:20
- Re: What holds the world together?, Robert J. Kolker, 08:17
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Androcles, 07:51
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Michael Gray, 07:10
- Endless debate, donstockbauer, 06:54
- Re: Physicists have devised a new way to focus water waves, donstockbauer, 06:40
- Re: Physicists have devised a new way to focus water waves, mountain man, 05:44
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Jan Panteltje, 05:38
- Re: Express quantities of force and mass in weight units; not inertia units:, Bob Cain, 05:24
- Re: The Mass Media Conspiracy, Tom Peel, 05:20
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, jmfbahciv, 05:15
- Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes, Hurricane Guy, 04:58
- Re: a question about juggler, Mike, 03:51
- Re: What holds the world together?, Mike, 03:45
- a question about juggler, comtech, 03:35
- Re: PHOTONS and SR, blackboab, 03:35
- PHOTONS and SR, blackboab, 03:31
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Androcles, 03:04
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Androcles, 03:03
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Androcles, 02:59
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 02:57
- Re: What holds the world together?, mmeron, 02:55
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, TomGee, 02:24
- Re: Am I softy or what ?, tj Frazir, 02:22
- Re: Express quantities of force and mass in weight units; not inertia units:, snapdragon31, 02:12
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., dumpster4, 02:09
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, Eric Gisse, 02:09
- Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, tj Frazir, 02:07
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 02:02
- Re: Am I softy or what ?, Jeff_Relf, 01:39
- Re: What holds the world together?, Y.Porat, 01:39
- Re: What holds the world together?, Robert J. Kolker, 01:31
- Re: What holds the world together?, Robert J. Kolker, 01:30
- Independent/Dependent Phases 12: Special Relativity, OsherD, 01:16
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Rod Ryker, 01:08
- Sadly, Chris_V's _Plonks_ are amoung his greatest contributions here., Jeff_Relf, 00:57
- Re: A global role for physics, Mike, 00:52
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, Paul Cardinale, 00:47
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 00:46
- Binary Dice, Sam Wormley, 00:25
- Increasingly, judges decide what science--if any--a jury hears, Sam Wormley, 00:25
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Rod Ryker, 00:21
- Re: Incredible, EugeniuszW, 00:05
- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 7 October 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 00:03
- Re: Better then startrek, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
October 07, 2005
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Bilge, 23:44
- How does one measure freedom when it's ever virtual, never real ?, Jeff_Relf, 23:42
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Randy Poe, 23:35
- Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, hanson, 23:24
- Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, tj Frazir, 23:23
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 23:22
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:14
- Pardon me if I don't work for Martin or Bradley., Jeff_Relf, 23:13
- Re: A Java Language Theory Application Demonstration, Douglas Eagleson, 22:27
- Re: Physicists have devised a new way to focus water waves, tj Frazir, 22:21
- Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity, Sam Wormley, 22:09
- Re: Express quantities of force and mass in weight units; not inertia units:, donstockbauer, 22:08
- Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, tj Frazir, 22:07
- Physicists have devised a new way to focus water waves, Sam Wormley, 22:07
- Re: What holds the world together?, donstockbauer, 22:07
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, Don1, 22:04
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, donstockbauer, 22:02
- Express quantities of force and mass in weight units; not inertia units:, Don1, 21:58
- Re: GOD=G_uv GOD AND GLOBAL HEAT DEATH, donstockbauer, 21:57
- Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 21:55
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, donstockbauer, 21:43
- Re: The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, Sam Wormley, 21:36
- The acceleration of gravity at sea level is about g=32'/sec^2, Don1, 21:26
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Rod Ryker, 21:24
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, BEE, 21:23
- Re: Density, Uncle Al, 21:14
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, operator jay, 20:27
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, donstockbauer, 20:03
- Re: Density, donstockbauer, 19:56
- Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Uncle Al, 19:35
- Re: Density, Uncle Al, 19:33
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", jowr . pi, 19:30
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, bill, 19:29
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Thomas Johnson, 19:23
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, OG, 19:19
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, OG, 19:17
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Thomas Johnson, 19:10
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 19:08
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Androcles, 19:08
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 19:04
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Jan Panteltje, 18:53
- Re: Homes after Katrina, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:51
- Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", OG, 18:50
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 11: Univariate fX(x) = 1/2, OsherD, 18:41
- Re: What holds the world together?, Randy Poe, 18:31
- Re: Newtons Laws, Don1, 18:31
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", Randy Poe, 18:26
- Re: Siphons, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:25
- Re: A Java Language Theory Application Demonstration, Androcles, 18:24
- Re: What holds the world together?, Don1, 18:23
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 11: Univariate fX(x) = 1/2, OsherD, 18:22
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Androcles, 18:18
- Re: Density, Don1, 18:15
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Androcles, 18:13
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:13
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Sam Wormley, 18:10
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Randy Poe, 18:10
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, Androcles, 18:08
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 11: Univariate fX(x) = 1/2, OsherD, 18:02
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", Don1, 18:01
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", Don1, 17:58
- Independent/Dependent Phases 11: Univariate fX(x) = 1/2, OsherD, 17:56
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, PD, 17:51
- NON-POTENTIAL OBJECTS, viktor_mrz, 17:48
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", Eric Gisse, 17:46
- Re: Computing quantites of materials, Paul Cardinale, 17:22
- Re: The Mass Media Conspiracy, Bret Cahill, 17:17
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Jan Panteltje, 16:58
- Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Sam Wormley, 16:45
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Randy Poe, 16:40
- "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Gnah, 16:37
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Jan Panteltje, 16:34
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Kadaitcha Man, 16:33
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, sal, 16:29
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 16:24
- Re: Density, odin, 16:10
- Re: A Java Language Theory Application Demonstration, Uncle Al, 16:10
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Uncle Al, 16:08
- Re: Density, Uncle Al, 16:04
- Re: Siphons, jpopelish, 15:54
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Mark Martin, 15:52
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, operator jay, 15:42
- Re: Fractal String Theory - The saga continues ;-), Happy Hippy, 15:40
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, OG, 15:40
- Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, FrediFizzx, 15:27
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, md, 15:27
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 15:25
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", odin, 15:23
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 15:21
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", Don1, 15:17
- Re: Density, odin, 15:15
- Re: Fractal String Theory - The saga continues ;-), john_ramsden, 15:13
- Re: Computing quantites of materials, odin, 15:09
- Re: Density, Don1, 15:06
- Re: Siphons, OG, 15:05
- Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity, Sam Wormley, 14:59
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:55
- Re: Computing quantites of materials, Don1, 14:54
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Oct 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 14:52
- Why c^2 in E=mc^2?, StrayMk2, 14:51
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Rod Ryker, 14:47
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:46
- A Java Language Theory Application Demonstration, Douglas Eagleson, 14:36
- Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, T Wake, 14:35
- Re: T.J. is a fabulous writer at times... at times., T Wake, 14:35
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, jimp, 14:24
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Bryan Olson, 14:03
- Re: The curent state of physics, tadchem, 13:48
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, tadchem, 13:41
- Re: Siphons, Androcles, 13:40
- Re: The curent state of physics, Androcles, 13:37
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, jimp, 13:34
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, tadchem, 13:33
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, hanson, 13:26
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, hanson, 13:26
- Re: Computing quantites of materials, odin, 13:22
- Re: The curent state of physics, blackboab, 13:17
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Thomas Johnson, 13:16
- Re: Siphons, tadchem, 13:15
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Androcles, 13:14
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, CWatters, 13:08
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Androcles, 13:00
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, tadchem, 12:49
- Re: Density, odin, 12:48
- Re: The curent state of physics, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:45
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, CWatters, 12:44
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:34
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Lloyd Parker, 12:28
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 10: Re-interpretation of f(x,y) = 1/2, OsherD, 12:27
- Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 12:23
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Androcles, 12:15
- Independent/Dependent Phases 10: Re-interpretation of f(x,y) = 1/2, OsherD, 12:15
- Re: Siphons, Order of the Solar Temple, 12:12
- Re: Density, Androcles, 12:10
- Homes after Katrina, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 12:09
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, TomGee, 12:03
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2, OsherD, 11:57
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, PD, 11:53
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Attila the Bum, 11:53
- Re: Density, Uncle Al, 11:52
- Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, tj Frazir, 11:50
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Richard Herring, 11:47
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Cardinal Chunder, 11:42
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Thomas Johnson, 11:33
- Re: Density, Don1, 11:30
- Re: Computing quantites of materials, Don1, 11:21
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", odin, 11:17
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Attila the Bum, 11:16
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", Don1, 11:10
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Richard Herring, 11:06
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Androcles, 10:50
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, tadchem, 10:41
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 10:38
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, tadchem, 10:30
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, wespe, 10:24
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Jan Panteltje, 10:21
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, tadchem, 10:21
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Mark Martin, 10:17
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", Double-A, 10:13
- Better then startrek, Jan Panteltje, 10:10
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2, tadchem, 10:07
- Re: Computing quantites of materials, Double-A, 10:04
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 10:03
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 09:58
- Re: The curent state of physics, Mike Speed, 09:52
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, odin, 09:42
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 09:24
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Art Deco, 09:10
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Art Deco, 09:08
- Re: Density, Androcles, 09:04
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 09:00
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 08:58
- Density, Don1, 08:57
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Michael Baldwin Bruce, 08:56
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, jem, 08:49
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 08:43
- Fractal String Theory - The saga continues ;-), john_ramsden, 08:42
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, jem, 08:36
- Re: Computing quantites of materials, Don1, 08:31
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Androcles, 08:10
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Doug Huffman, 08:09
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, janey3white, 08:07
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, Doug Huffman, 08:05
- Computing quantites of materials, Don1, 07:37
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Jan Panteltje, 07:22
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Jan Panteltje, 07:11
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Jan Panteltje, 06:51
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., jmfbahciv, 06:33
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, jmfbahciv, 06:20
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:53
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, nightbat, 05:51
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 05:22
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, nightbat, 05:09
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Lloyd Parker, 04:22
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 04:18
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 04:00
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 9: Mixed Partial Physics Equations, OsherD, 03:59
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 03:57
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 03:56
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, TomGee, 03:36
- Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, hanson, 03:01
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, hanson, 02:56
- Re: Relativity for Nongs, Timo Nieminen, 02:54
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 9: Mixed Partial Physics Equations, OsherD, 02:50
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 9: Mixed Partial Physics Equations, OsherD, 02:32
- Independent/Dependent Phases 9: Mixed Partial Physics Equations, OsherD, 02:26
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Schoenfeld, 02:15
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Rod Ryker, 02:14
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2, OsherD, 02:07
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, hanson, 01:50
- Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, Bob Cain, 01:47
- Re: Most beggars are insane and suicidal, trust me., Bob Cain, 01:19
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Charlie Springer, 00:58
- Latest Theories about the Universe, nekoogar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:49
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 00:27
- Re: T.J. is a fabulous writer at times... at times., tj Frazir, 00:06
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bob Cain, 00:04
October 06, 2005
- Re: T.J. is a fabulous writer at times... at times., tj Frazir, 23:50
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", Sam Wormley, 23:50
- Re: Siphons, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 23:47
- Re: Definitions of mass and force; A critique, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 23:45
- Vacuum challenges and solutions, Sam Wormley, 23:43
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 23:42
- Re: Siphons, John Popelish, 23:40
- Re: Siphons, John Popelish, 23:39
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Order of the Solar Temple, 23:12
- Re: Killfile *ALL* Liberals PERIOD. (was: New site blah blah...), Anonymous, 23:06
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: Siphons, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: Siphons, Order of the Solar Temple, 22:45
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", Uncle Al, 22:30
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, lightenergy, 22:28
- Re: The Mass Media Conspiracy, EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque), 22:26
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", Order of the Solar Temple, 22:26
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", odin, 22:21
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", Don1, 22:17
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2, Puppet_Sock, 22:15
- Re: The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", odin, 22:12
- The symbol for weight is "w"; the symbol for mass is "w/g", Don1, 22:03
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 21:59
- Re: Siphons, donstockbauer, 21:55
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Tom Roberts, 21:52
- Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?, donstockbauer, 21:45
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Will Janoschka, 21:29
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Jim Logajan, 20:47
- Re: Siphons, Steven Gray, 20:42
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Paul Stowe, 20:38
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Llanzlan Klazmon, 20:27
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, donstockbauer, 20:01
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, donstockbauer, 19:51
- Re: Using electricity to repel an object?, Sam Wormley, 19:44
- Using electricity to repel an object?, janey3white, 19:38
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., dumpster4, 19:35
- Re: Siphons, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:25
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Art Deco, 19:19
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., dumpster4, 19:11
- Re: Siphons, Uncle Al, 19:08
- Re: The curent state of physics, Uncle Al, 19:07
- Re: Is this experiment reproducible or valid?, Greysky, 19:06
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Art Deco, 19:02
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Art Deco, 19:02
- Re: The curent state of physics, hhc314, 19:00
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Greysky, 18:55
- Re: Siphons, Androcles, 18:48
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, nightbat, 18:39
- Re: Is this experiment reproducible or valid?, Chris Carlen, 18:35
- Re: Siphons, Sam Wormley, 18:24
- Re: BBC Series "Space", Androcles, 18:22
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 18:19
- Re: Is this experiment reproducible or valid?, CWatters, 18:07
- Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?, Mark-T, 17:54
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Jan Panteltje, 17:50
- Siphons, Mark-T, 17:47
- Re: BBC Series "Space", CWatters, 17:44
- The curent state of physics, Mike Speed, 17:40
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, md, 17:26
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, Bill Hobba, 17:20
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, mmeron, 16:53
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 16:50
- Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?, onehappymadman, 16:48
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 16:39
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Rene Tschaggelar, 16:35
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 16:35
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Al Zenner, 16:34
- Re: Is this experiment reproducible or valid?, Greysky, 16:20
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Greysky, 16:06
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 16:04
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, hanson, 15:42
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, PD, 15:39
- Re: Even liers tell the truth sometimes., Mark Martin, 15:27
- Re: The Mass Media Conspiracy, Order of the Soalr Temple, 15:26
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, nightbat, 15:24
- U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Greysky, 15:23
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Order of the Soalr Temple, 15:20
- Re: U.S. forced to give up control of internet to Iran & China, Doug Huffman, 15:16
- Re: Motion, PD, 15:16
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 15:15
- Re: Do people in this group REALLY know something about physics?, tdennis14, 15:09
- Re: Even liers tell the truth sometimes., T Wake, 15:07
- Re: elementary particles have exact charge and mass, Mark Martin, 15:07
- Re: T.J., T Wake, 15:06
- Re: Even liers tell the truth sometimes., T Wake, 15:05
- Re: Conservation of energy, tdennis14, 15:03
- Re: Am I softy or what ?, T Wake, 15:03
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Don1, 15:02
- Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?, tdennis14, 14:55
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Androcles, 14:14
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Uncle Al, 14:11
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 14:06
- Re: The Mass Media Conspiracy, Bret Cahill, 14:03
- Re: Toshiba presents first methanol mp3 players, 35 and 60 hours on a refill, Rich Grise, 13:59
- Re: The Mass Media Conspiracy, Doug Huffman, 13:57
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Uncle Al, 13:55
- Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Uncle Al, 13:52
- Re: elementary particles have exact charge and mass, Uncle Al, 13:50
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Uncle Al, 13:47
- The Mass Media Conspiracy, edconrad, 13:43
- Nobel Prize 2005 "Agrees" With Aligned Colliding Plane Waves (CPW), OsherD, 13:40
- Re: Antiprotonic helium (Oct 5), Uncle Al, 13:36
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, mmarziale2, 13:28
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Human Individual Metamorphosis, 13:28
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Androcles, 13:24
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, mmarziale2, 13:15
- Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use, Androcles, 13:08
- Thermal insulation for vacuum use, mmarziale2, 13:02
- Re: Is this experiment reproducible or valid?, Robert J. Kolker, 12:49
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Roger Conroy, 12:27
- Re: Am I softy or what ?, Mark Martin, 12:17
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Randy Poe, 12:06
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 12:01
- Calling Einstein bluff .. OK AGAIN with CApItaLS CALLING EINSTEIN BLUFF, MEASURING OWLS, ftl_freak, 11:48
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 11:46
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:26
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, ianparker2, 11:19
- Re: BBC Series "Space", Androcles, 11:18
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Don1, 11:15
- Re: BBC Series "Space", Androcles, 11:14
- Is this experiment reproducible or valid?, Chris Carlen, 11:13
- Calling Einstein bluff .. OK AGAIN with CApItaLS CALLING EINSTEIN BLUFF, MEASURING OWLS, ftl_freak, 11:09
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Don1, 11:06
- Re: Even liers tell the truth sometimes., Gregory L. Hansen, 10:50
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, Russell, 10:50
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, mmeron, 10:49
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:49
- Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Sam Wormley, 10:41
- Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Happy Hippy, 10:41
- Re: possible silly questions, Sam Wormley, 10:33
- "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Gnah, 10:31
- Re: possible silly questions, Mark Martin, 10:30
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, wespe, 10:21
- Re: Even liers tell the truth sometimes., Mark Martin, 10:16
- The Career of Lincoln, John Bailo, 10:11
- Re: possible silly questions, muser, 10:04
- Re: BBC Series "Space", Mark Martin, 10:02
- Re: BBC Series "Space", Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 09:53
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, wespe, 09:49
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Doug Huffman, 09:44
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, jimp, 09:42
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 09:41
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, tadchem, 09:34
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, tadchem, 09:34
- Re: BBC Series "Space", CWatters, 09:33
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Randy Poe, 09:18
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, jem, 09:16
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 09:15
- Re: Article: A large population of galaxies 9 to 12 billion years back in the history of the Universe (HTML), Sam Wormley, 09:08
- Re: Even liers tell the truth sometimes., chrisv, 09:01
- Re: Incredible, The Ghost In The Machine, 09:00
- Re: Antiprotonic helium (Oct 5), Sam Wormley, 08:57
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, jem, 08:57
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, oriel36, 08:50
- Re: BBC Series "Space", Androcles, 08:26
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Don1, 08:22
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., jmfbahciv, 08:15
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., jmfbahciv, 08:12
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Bilge, 08:05
- Re: Antiprotonic helium (Oct 5), Ian Parker, 07:17
- Re: Aetherptheory and GUT, Ole D. Rughede, 07:14
- Re: elementary particles have exact charge and mass, dividby0, 07:14
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Paul Schlyter, 07:13
- Re: Lewis Carroll and the Invariance of the Speed of Light, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 07:08
- Re: BBC Series "Space", Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 07:06
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 06:47
- Re: Mach's Principle and the Electrodynamic Induction Analog, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 06:09
- Re: Lewis Carroll and the Invariance of the Speed of Light, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 06:07
- Re: Lewis Carroll and the Invariance of the Speed of Light, Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 06:06
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, jmfbahciv, 05:51
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 05:50
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 05:49
- Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior, Ian Parker, 05:40
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, tadchem, 05:39
- Re: Identifying the best physics content on the web, Atanu, 05:22
- Re: What holds the world together?, MorituriMax, 05:11
- Re: What holds the world together?, MorituriMax, 05:10
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 05:05
- Re: Even liers tell the truth sometimes., Helmut Wabnig, 04:39
- elementary particles have exact charge and mass, dedanoe, 04:14
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bill Hobba, 04:11
- Re: Kill asshole min, Italiano, 04:01
- BBC Series "Space", CWatters, 03:47
- Re: Article: A large population of galaxies 9 to 12 billion years back in the history of the Universe (HTML), jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:45
- Re: When negative numbers are real, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:39
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, CWatters, 03:38
- Re: Conservation of Energy Problem, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:22
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2, OsherD, 03:17
- 1D wave PDE help, vsgdp, 02:52
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 8: Aligned Colliding Plane Waves (CPW), OsherD, 02:46
- Independent/Dependent Phases 8: Aligned Colliding Plane Waves (CPW), OsherD, 02:32
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, FrediFizzx, 02:29
- Re: An alternate explanation of E=mc^2, franklinhu, 02:11
- Am I softy or what ?, Jeff_Relf, 02:07
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Rod Ryker, 01:59
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bilge, 01:23
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., dumpster4, 01:18
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 00:46
- Re: Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Charlie Springer, 00:41
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 00:36
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, PD, 00:35
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Rod Ryker, 00:33
October 05, 2005
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, mmeron, 23:55
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, jimp, 23:54
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2, Puppet_Sock, 23:54
- Re: A global role for physics, jimp, 23:42
- Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, jimp, 23:38
- Re: Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Human Individual Metamorphosis, 23:34
- Bimetallic electrical Potential and conservation of charge, Paul Stowe, 23:30
- Reviews, Sam Wormley, 23:18
- A global role for physics, Sam Wormley, 23:18
- Antiprotonic helium (Oct 5), Sam Wormley, 23:17
- Probing the antiworld (Oct 5), Sam Wormley, 23:15
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, Rod Ryker, 23:15
- Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?, Sam Wormley, 23:12
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, bill, 22:47
- Re: Evolution=atheism, donstockbauer, 22:46
- Re: collision of two neutron stars, or ..., donstockbauer, 22:43
- Re: Even liers tell the truth sometimes., Gregory L. Hansen, 22:31
- Re: T.J., tj Frazir, 22:23
- T.J. is a fabulous writer at times... at times., Jeff_Relf, 21:56
- Re: possible silly questions, Uncle Al, 21:49
- Re: Wind energy overtakes nuclear energy in India, jimp, 21:26
- Re: Hamilton's Principle with nonholonomic constraints ???, Jason Stanidge, 19:51
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:46
- Re: Could we use endothermic(heat absorbing) reactions to reduce hurricane strength?, A Espinoza, 19:12
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:05
- Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, hanson, 19:00
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Keith W, 18:58
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, Bill Hobba, 18:57
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 18:53
- Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, T Wake, 18:52
- Re: T.J. could've bought all the _Love_ in the world, but he didn't., T Wake, 18:50
- Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?, Jeff_Relf, 18:44
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, Ken S. Tucker, 18:36
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 7: Dyt vs Dtt Make Most "Universal Constants" Implausible, OsherD, 18:03
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 7: Dyt vs Dtt Make Most "Universal Constants" Implausible, OsherD, 17:52
- Independent/Dependent Phases 7: Dyt vs Dtt Make Most "Universal Constants" Implausible, OsherD, 17:39
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 17:39
- Re: If isn't messy you're not doing it right., Eric Gisse, 17:38
- Re: possible silly questions, Androcles, 17:36
- Re: possible silly questions, Sam Wormley, 17:32
- Re: possible silly questions, muser, 17:30
- Re: Finally, Don_Stockbauer makes sense., Mark Martin, 17:22
- Finally, Don_Stockbauer makes sense., Jeff_Relf, 17:17
- Re: T.J. could've bought all the _Love_ in the world, but he didn't., Mark Martin, 17:13
- Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior, Sam Wormley, 17:12
- Re: possible silly questions, Sam Wormley, 17:10
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 16:59
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 16:57
- Re: possible silly questions, Sam Wormley, 16:54
- Re: T.J. could've bought all the _Love_ in the world, but he didn't., Jeff_Relf, 16:53
- Re: possible silly questions, Androcles, 16:52
- Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior, mwmiller314, 16:51
- Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior, mwmiller314, 16:51
- Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior, mwmiller314, 16:50
- Re: possible silly questions, Sam Wormley, 16:49
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Keith W, 16:44
- Re: possible silly questions, Mark Martin, 16:42
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 16:38
- possible silly questions, muser, 16:23
- Kinetic energy and power, jclause, 16:06
- Hamilton's Principle with nonholonomic constraints ???, erland, 16:04
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 16:01
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, oriel36, 15:51
- Re: Motion, PD, 15:49
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, PD, 15:38
- Re: T.J. could've bought all the _Love_ in the world, but he didn't., Mark Martin, 15:32
- Re: An even stranger idea.., Mark Martin, 15:28
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, mmeron, 15:27
- Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds, Sam Wormley, 15:25
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Timo Nieminen, 15:25
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, lightenergy, 15:21
- Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds, Ken Muldrew, 15:15
- Re: What holds the world together?, PD, 15:10
- Re: T.J. could've bought all the _Love_ in the world, but he didn't., chrisv, 15:08
- Re: T.J. could've bought all the _Love_ in the world, but he didn't., Randy Poe, 15:06
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, PD, 15:03
- Re: An even stranger idea.., Androcles, 14:51
- Re: Toshiba presents first methanol mp3 players, 35 and 60 hours on a refill, lannybudd, 14:50
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 14:47
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 14:45
- Re: Two Americans, a German Win 2005 Nobel Prize in Physics, Sam Wormley, 14:43
- Re: An even stranger idea.., tadchem, 14:43
- neutron star crashing into a black hole or another neutron star, Sam Wormley, 14:39
- Re: Physics Help. Spring Problem, tadchem, 14:38
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 14:37
- Re: Entanglement through environment, IWonder, 14:33
- Re: Two Americans, a German Win 2005 Nobel Prize in Physics, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 14:31
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 14:27
- Re: Schwarzchild radius of this Cosmos, hanson, 14:24
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 14:20
- Re: T.J. could've bought all the _Love_ in the world, but he didn't., T Wake, 14:19
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Robert J. Kolker, 14:18
- Re: Incredible, Eugeniusz, 14:18
- Re: Entanglement through environment, Uncle Al, 14:15
- Re: An even stranger idea.., blackboab, 14:13
- Re: T.J. could've bought all the _Love_ in the world, but he didn't., T Wake, 14:11
- Re: Physics Help. Spring Problem, timwryan, 14:10
- Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Uncle Al, 14:09
- Re: T.J., T Wake, 14:09
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Uncle Al, 14:09
- Re: Most beggars are insane and suicidal, trust me., T Wake, 14:08
- Re: I get nearly nothing in return for baby_sitting the insane., T Wake, 14:06
- Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds, Sam Wormley, 14:05
- Re: Maybe I just care that much more about the people I'm with., T Wake, 14:04
- Re: Mark_Martin, I call your bluff., T Wake, 14:02
- Re: Incredible, Uncle Al, 14:01
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, odin, 13:53
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 13:49
- Re: Physics Help. Spring Problem, timwryan, 13:48
- Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds, Ken Muldrew, 13:45
- Entanglement through environment, IWonder, 13:44
- Re: Schwarzchild radius of this Cosmos, kogs, 13:41
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 13:41
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, odin, 13:36
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, FrediFizzx, 13:32
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Attila the Bum, 13:25
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Uncle Al, 13:19
- Re: What holds the world together?, tadchem, 13:18
- Re: What holds the world together?, odin, 13:06
- Re: What holds the world together?, Randy Poe, 13:06
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Jonathan Silverlight, 12:57
- Re: What holds the world together?, 888, 12:51
- Re: What holds the world together?, odin, 12:51
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 12:48
- Re: T.J. could've bought all the _Love_ in the world, but he didn't., Mark Martin, 12:45
- Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds, Sam Wormley, 12:44
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 12:35
- Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:34
- Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time, Sam Wormley, 12:31
- Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds, mmeron, 12:30
- Re: Physics Help. Spring Problem, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:28
- Re: What holds the world together?, Randy Poe, 12:27
- Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds, Ken Muldrew, 12:25
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Keith W, 12:25
- Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time, blackboab, 12:25
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:21
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, jim . wilkins, 12:18
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Keith W, 12:18
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Keith W, 12:12
- Re: What holds the world together?, donstockbauer, 12:09
- Re: What holds the world together?, Randy Poe, 12:09
- Re: What holds the world together?, Randy Poe, 12:06
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, franklinhu, 12:01
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 12:00
- Re: Physics Help. Spring Problem, Randy Poe, 11:54
- Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website), Terry, 11:52
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Robert J. Kolker, 11:51
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 11:50
- Re: Newtons Laws, Eric Gisse, 11:49
- Re: Schwarzchild radius of this Cosmos, hanson, 11:48
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 11:44
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 11:40
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, John Neiberger, 11:38
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 11:32
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 11:31
- Re: Physics Help. Spring Problem, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:23
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, John Neiberger, 11:23
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Keith W, 11:13
- Re: Dumb Question, James Copeland, 11:11
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:07
- T.J. could've bought all the _Love_ in the world, but he didn't., Jeff_Relf, 11:07
- Re: Conservation of Energy Problem, Sam Wormley, 11:05
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:05
- Re: Conservation of Energy Problem, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:54
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Attila the Bum, 10:46
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:45
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 10:37
- Re: Schwarzchild radius of this Cosmos, Sam Wormley, 10:31
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Androcles, 10:28
- Re: Spacetime Torsion visualization, Androcles, 10:07
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, wespe, 10:07
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 10:04
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 10:04
- Schwarzchild radius of this Cosmos, kogs, 09:57
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, wespe, 09:55
- Re: When negative numbers are real, abe . buckingham, 09:50
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 09:49
- Re: What holds the world together?, Don1, 09:45
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 09:45
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 09:45
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 09:43
- Re: Mark_Martin, I call your bluff., chrisv, 09:38
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Mark Martin, 09:35
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 09:34
- Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Sam Wormley, 09:33
- Re: Newtons Laws, Don1, 09:32
- Re: What holds the world together?, Jan Panteltje, 09:29
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., Jan Panteltje, 09:29
- "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Sknil, 09:28
- Re: Mark_Martin, I call your bluff., Mark Martin, 09:25
- Re: What holds the world together?, PD, 09:25
- Re: What holds the world together?, 888, 09:13
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 09:12
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Michael Gray, 09:09
- Re: What holds the world together?, 888, 09:08
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 09:02
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 08:50
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, jem, 08:46
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, jem, 08:42
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, Dirk Van de moortel, 08:40
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 08:26
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 08:26
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 08:25
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, jim . wilkins, 08:18
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 08:12
- Re: What holds the world together?, Don1, 08:03
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, PD, 08:02
- Re: What holds the world together?, Don1, 07:57
- Re: Relativity for Nongs, Ian Macmillan, 07:53
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Keith W, 07:49
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, wespe, 07:47
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 07:43
- Re: Motion, PD, 07:41
- Re: Mark_Martin, I call your bluff., donstockbauer, 07:38
- Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website), donstockbauer, 07:35
- Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website), PD, 07:22
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 07:21
- Re: What holds the world together?, Igor, 07:18
- Mark_Martin, I call your bluff., Jeff_Relf, 07:09
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, donstockbauer, 07:00
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, donstockbauer, 06:58
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, donstockbauer, 06:53
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Michael Gray, 06:45
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 06:41
- Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior, donstockbauer, 06:40
- Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website), Steve, 06:36
- Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior, Ian Parker, 06:28
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Wizard of Odd, 06:08
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, ianparker2, 06:08
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 05:57
- An even stranger idea.., Jan Panteltje, 05:33
- Re: Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, George Dishman, 05:15
- Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds, Richard Herring, 05:07
- Re: Gap in Einstein's Early Argument for Existence of Photons, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:02
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:37
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 03:59
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 6: Power pdf fX(x) = 1/2, OsherD, 03:55
- Von Neumann machines - The key to Space and much else, Ian Parker, 03:49
- Independent/Dependent Phases 6: Power pdf fX(x) = 1/2, OsherD, 03:47
- Re: What holds the world together?, CWatters, 03:45
- Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior, mwmiller314, 03:44
- Re: Spacetime Torsion visualization, Helmut Wabnig, 03:40
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 03:39
- Re: Newtons Laws, Y.Porat, 03:22
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., blackboab, 03:12
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., blackboab, 03:06
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2, OsherD, 03:01
- Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior, CWatters, 02:57
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2, OsherD, 02:41
- Re: Newtons Laws, thomas guild, 02:19
- Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior, Sam Wormley, 02:18
- Re: Energy density of electric field, rancid moth, 02:16
- Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior, mwmiller314, 02:12
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2, Puppet_Sock, 01:50
- Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2, OsherD, 01:43
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., Nick, 01:18
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 01:06
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 01:02
- Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website), The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 00:43
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 00:35
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Michael Gray, 00:16
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 00:08
- Re: T.J., Mark Martin, 00:08
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 00:06
October 04, 2005
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 23:54
- Re: energy derived from differential specific gravities?, Robert Morein, 23:46
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Will Janoschka, 23:39
- Re: basic 2D vector question, mmeron, 23:37
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 23:34
- Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website), Sam Wormley, 23:33
- Re: Motion, PD, 23:32
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., Mark Martin, 23:29
- Re: Most beggars are insane and suicidal, trust me., Mark Martin, 23:26
- Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website), Steven Gray, 23:24
- Re: I get nearly nothing in return for baby_sitting the insane., Mark Martin, 23:21
- Re: basic 2D vector question, Steven Gray, 23:17
- Re: Continuity of spacetime - Dammit people..., LEFTY, 23:16
- Maybe I just care that much more about the people I'm with., Jeff_Relf, 23:13
- Re: Incredible, Eugeniusz, 23:02
- Once Again: Nobel prize recognizes optics researchers (Oct 4), Sam Wormley, 23:02
- basic 2D vector question, vsgdp, 22:53
- Re: Motion, platopes, 22:49
- Re: I get nearly nothing in return for baby_sitting the insane., Jeff_Relf, 22:46
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 4: Some f(x) = 1/2 Comparisons, OsherD, 22:33
- T.J., Jeff_Relf, 22:29
- Re: What holds the world together?, mini haha, 22:23
- Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", donstockbauer, 22:21
- Re: Motion, PD, 22:19
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 4: Some f(x) = 1/2 Comparisons, donstockbauer, 22:14
- Re: I get nearly nothing in return for baby_sitting the insane., Jeff_Relf, 21:57
- Re: What holds the world together?, odin, 21:54
- Re: What holds the world together?, odin, 21:50
- Re: What holds the world together?, mini haha, 21:47
- Re: What holds the world together?, odin, 21:45
- Re: What holds the world together?, mini haha, 21:45
- Re: I get nearly nothing in return for baby_sitting the insane., Mark Martin, 21:43
- Most beggars are insane and suicidal, trust me., Jeff_Relf, 21:42
- Re: What holds the world together?, odin, 21:38
- Re: What holds the world together?, donstockbauer, 21:36
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bill Hobba, 21:33
- Re: I get nearly nothing in return for baby_sitting the insane., donstockbauer, 21:33
- I get nearly nothing in return for baby_sitting the insane., Jeff_Relf, 21:27
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Bill Hobba, 21:22
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 21:22
- Re: What holds the world together?, Don1, 21:21
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, John Neiberger, 21:20
- Re: Why doesn't light go into the nucleus?, Y.Porat, 21:18
- Re: What holds the world together?, LR, 21:14
- Re: What holds the world together?, Clemens W, 21:09
- What holds the world together?, Don1, 21:02
- Re: Conservation of Energy Problem, Ken S. Tucker, 20:57
- Simple physics question (from BBC website), Terry, 20:57
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, FrediFizzx, 20:42
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Timo Nieminen, 20:21
- Re: Dumb Question, Steven Gray, 20:14
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Bilge, 20:04
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 19:53
- Re: Why doesn't light go into the nucleus?, Bilge, 19:51
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 19:49
- Re: Incredible, Sam Wormley, 19:31
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Timo Nieminen, 19:16
- Gap in Einstein's Early Argument for Existence of Photons, Sam Wormley, 19:14
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., Paul Stowe, 19:07
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 18:54
- Incredible, Eugeniusz, 18:48
- Re: Newtons Laws, Clemens W, 18:46
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Timo Nieminen, 18:43
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Al Zenner, 18:29
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 18:23
- Re: Motion, PD, 18:19
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, John Neiberger, 18:13
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Timo Nieminen, 18:09
- Re: Poverty does not equal insanity., Mark Martin, 18:04
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, FrediFizzx, 18:02
- Re: Spacetime Torsion visualization, Uncle Al, 18:00
- Re: Can Motion Relate to the Ether?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:55
- Re: Poverty does not equal insanity., T Wake, 17:42
- Re: Motion, TomGee, 17:28
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, John Neiberger, 17:12
- Re: Poverty does not equal insanity., Mark Martin, 17:08
- Re: Why doesn't light go into the nucleus?, mmeron, 17:05
- Re: how to answer this question?, radio, 17:04
- Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds, mmeron, 17:02
- Re: I'm reverse thinking and those are my limits, Sam Wormley, 16:55
- Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, FrediFizzx, 16:52
- Re: Spacetime Torsion visualization, Androcles, 16:36
- Re: Poverty does not equal insanity., T Wake, 16:33
- Re: Can't T_Wake give examples ?, T Wake, 16:23
- Re: Newtons Laws, Minus XVII, 16:23
- Re: I only trust studies on mammals, like rats... that's hard science., T Wake, 16:20
- RE: Spacetime Torsion visualization, Helmut Wabnig, 16:11
- Physics Help. Spring Problem, timwryan, 15:59
- Re: I'm reverse thinking and those are my limits, Paolo, 15:51
- Re: Newtons Laws, odin, 15:47
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 15:35
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, oriel36, 15:35
- Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?, John Neiberger, 15:28
- Light independent orientation (Lio), Hero . van . Jindelt, 15:25
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 15:14
- Independent/Dependent Phases 3: What is pdf f(t) = 1/2 in Accelerating Universe?, OsherD, 15:04
- Re: Newtons Laws, PD, 14:53
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 2: Classical Logistic Equation, OsherD, 14:52
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 2: Classical Logistic Equation, OsherD, 14:45
- Re: Calculating wave functions?, PD, 14:44
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:30
- Independent/Dependent Phases 2: Classical Logistic Equation, OsherD, 14:29
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:17
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE --- Number 748 October 4, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe and Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 14:16
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Attila the Bum, 14:11
- Re: Why doesn't light go into the nucleus?, Bilge, 14:07
- Re: I only trust studies on mammals, like rats... that's hard science., Mark Martin, 14:04
- Re: Why doesn't light go into the nucleus?, Bilge, 14:03
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 13:52
- Re: I'm the pushover, Jill is the gun_toting madam, dealer., Mark Martin, 13:42
- Re: Newtons Laws, tadchem, 13:31
- Re: Motion, PD, 13:17
- I only trust studies on mammals, like rats... that's hard science., Jeff_Relf, 13:14
- Re: Newtons Laws, thomas guild, 13:09
- Re: zinc oxide, CWatters, 13:06
- Re: Identifying the best physics content on the web, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 13:02
- I'm the pushover, Jill is the gun_toting madam, dealer., Jeff_Relf, 13:00
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 12:36
- Re: October caption, Androcles, 12:26
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 12:23
- Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds, Richard Herring, 12:16
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 12:14
- Re: Can Motion Relate to the Ether?, Monist__, 12:09
- Re: October caption, Uncle Al, 12:06
- Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Uncle Al, 12:03
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Uncle Al, 12:02
- Re: I'm reverse thinking and those are my limits, Uncle Al, 12:02
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:57
- Calculating wave functions?, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 11:54
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Robert J. Kolker, 11:45
- zinc oxide, j0komo, 11:43
- zinc oxide, j0komo, 11:43
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Bilge, 11:41
- Re: Newtons Laws, Sam Wormley, 11:38
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 11:37
- Re: I'm reverse thinking and those are my limits, mini haha, 11:34
- October caption, Null, 11:26
- Re: Article: A large population of galaxies 9 to 12 billion years back in the history of the Universe (HTML), Al Zenner, 11:26
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:11
- Newtons Laws, Don1, 11:10
- Von Neumann machines. The key to space and much else., Ian Parker, 11:10
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 11:05
- Re: Article: A large population of galaxies 9 to 12 billion years back in the history of the Universe (HTML), Sam Wormley, 11:02
- Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 10:51
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., Sue..., 10:51
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:50
- Re: how to answer this question?, Sam Wormley, 10:50
- do not support the Trolls, don't support crossposting, mini haha, 10:47
- Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", cirejcon, 10:47
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., bz, 10:45
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Randy Poe, 10:44
- Two Americans, a German Win 2005 Nobel Prize in Physics, Sam Wormley, 10:41
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Randy Poe, 10:35
- Re: Motion, Don1, 10:33
- Re: Why doesn't light go into the nucleus?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:30
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Don1, 10:27
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., Al Zenner, 10:27
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Sam Wormley, 10:25
- Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Sam Wormley, 10:16
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Randy Poe, 10:14
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 10:11
- Re: Motion, Randy Poe, 10:02
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., blackboab, 09:51
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., blackboab, 09:50
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, wespe, 09:49
- Re: Motion, Don1, 09:24
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:22
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., Androcles, 09:21
- Re: First year student seeking help with SSB in dusty plasma crystal, Andy Resnick, 09:20
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., Sue..., 09:18
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., jmfbahciv, 09:13
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., Sue..., 09:04
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., Androcles, 09:01
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., blackboab, 08:57
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., blackboab, 08:55
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, wespe, 08:52
- "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Sknil, 08:50
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Don1, 08:49
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., Orion, 08:24
- Re: Identifying the best physics content on the web, Dirk Van de moortel, 08:21
- Re: Identifying the best physics content on the web, Jacob Sparre Andersen, 08:20
- Re: Identifying the best physics content on the web, Androcles, 08:10
- Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?, Schoenfeld, 07:58
- Re: The rate of free fall is g/2, Don1, 07:44
- Re: Entire Super Cosmos Multiverse Creates Itself, Ian Parker, 07:42
- Identifying the best physics content on the web, Atanu, 07:27
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., brian a m stuckless, 07:27
- Re: Drugs wear down the immune system, so say nothing of the nervous system., Mark Martin, 07:27
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., jmfbahciv, 07:17
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., donstockbauer, 07:08
- Re: Has the speed of light emitted by a fast moving particle been measured ?, jmfbahciv, 06:58
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., blackboab, 06:54
- Re: Unbound particles and energy, brian a m stuckless, 06:39
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Lloyd Parker, 06:38
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Lloyd Parker, 06:37
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, Lloyd Parker, 06:34
- Re: Why doesn't light go into the nucleus?, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:19
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., NunYa Bidness, 06:14
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., NunYa Bidness, 06:13
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., NunYa Bidness, 06:08
- Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz., NunYa Bidness, 06:08
- Re: how to answer this question?, CWatters, 06:00
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., Jan Panteltje, 06:00
- Re: Such little goes so far., Bob Cain, 05:57
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., blackboab, 05:43
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., Androcles, 05:19
- Re: energy derived from differential specific gravities?, dances_with_barkadas, 05:15
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 05:12
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 05:09
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, Androcles, 05:06
- Re: Unbound particles and energy, Sue..., 05:03
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., Sue..., 04:56
- Dirac Delta, Zinc Potterman, 04:50
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Cardinal Chunder, 04:43
- Re: Article: A large population of galaxies 9 to 12 billion years back in the history of the Universe (HTML), jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:31
- Re: Article: A large population of galaxies 9 to 12 billion years back in the history of the Universe (HTML), jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:26
- Re: how to answer this question?, PD, 04:21
- Re: Conservation of Energy Problem, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:06
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases, OsherD, 04:03
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, blackboab, 03:57
- Re: Energy density of electric field, Rusty, 03:41
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, PD, 03:36
- Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy, Dirk Van de moortel, 03:30
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, mmeron, 03:27
- Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time, Dirk Van de moortel, 03:18
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases, OsherD, 03:09
- Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, blackboab, 03:06
- Re: Independent/Dependent Phases, OsherD, 02:42
- Energy density of electric field, rancid moth, 02:29
- What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?, blackboab, 02:28
- Re: Psychic Powers - Human Potential Beyond The Physical, Michael Gray, 02:25
- Independent/Dependent Phases, OsherD, 02:20
- Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time, blackboab, 02:20
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., blackboab, 02:17
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., blackboab, 02:12
- Re: The space-stretch stretches light along with it., blackboab, 02:09
- Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?, franklinhu, 01:49
- Re: Acceleration of the Universe as Acceleration of Probable Influence Derivative 16 Remarkable Approximation of Dyt Operator, OsherD, 01:48
- Vodka and blue Gatorade., Jeff_Relf, 01:43
- Re: Unbound particles and energy, Y.Porat, 01:39
- Re: Acceleration of the Universe as Acceleration of Probable Influence Derivative 16 Remarkable Approximation of Dyt Operator, OsherD, 01:30
- Re: Unbound particles and energy, platopes, 01:24
- Re: Unbound particles and energy, Sue..., 01:11
- Re: Drugs wear down the immune system, so say nothing of the nervous system., Jeff_Relf, 01:09
- Such little goes so far., Jeff_Relf, 00:59
- Re: Unbound particles and energy, Tom Roberts, 00:58
- Re: Acceleration of the Universe as Acceleration of Probable Influence Derivative 16 Remarkable Approximation of Dyt Operator, OsherD, 00:57
- I'm reverse thinking and those are my limits, Paolo, 00:49