sci.physics (thread)

Re: ing dumbasses dont know any physics and post shit, tj Frazir, 2005/08/30
Re: Hurricane Katrina bugging out thoughts, tj Frazir, 2005/08/30
Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3, OsherD, 2005/08/30
- Re: Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3, OsherD, 2005/08/30
  - Re: Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3, OsherD, 2005/08/30
Probability Amplitudes and Black Holes, Mike Speed, 2005/08/30
Found a photo of Uncle Al, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/08/30
- Re: Found a photo of Uncle Al, Uncle Al, 2005/08/30
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 743 August 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stei, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/30
- Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 743 August 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stei, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/30
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 743 August 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/30
"Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Levart, 2005/08/30
- Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", donstockbauer, 2005/08/30
- Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/30
- Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Uncle Al, 2005/08/30
Re: Itax payers GAVE 4,000 USD this year., tj Frazir, 2005/08/30
Re: My user Ult ing PC dumbass, tj Frazir, 2005/08/30
Motion Through Space Is Meaningful, 2ndPostulateDude, 2005/08/30
- Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/30
  - Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful, 2ndPostulateDude, 2005/08/30
  - Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/30
The Ether is the past, |-|erc, 2005/08/30
- Re: The Ether is the past, donstockbauer, 2005/08/30
  - Re: The Ether is the past, donstockbauer, 2005/08/30
- Re: The Ether is the past, donstockbauer, 2005/08/30
- Re: The Ether is the past, donstockbauer, 2005/08/30
  - Re: The Ether is the past, |-|erc, 2005/08/30
- Re: The Ether is the past, Uncle Al, 2005/08/30
Free pedagogic comic book on electromagnetic!, Atar, 2005/08/30
- Re: Free pedagogic comic book on electromagnetic!, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/30
Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 2, OsherD, 2005/08/30
Tell the Martians that Eddie says 'Hi', Greysky, 2005/08/30
- Re: Tell the Martians that Eddie says 'Hi', Twittering One, 2005/08/30
  - Re: Tell the Martians that Eddie says 'Hi', Twittering One, 2005/08/30
- Re: Tell the Martians that Eddie says 'Hi', nightbat, 2005/08/30
Seperation of Atheism and State., macromitch, 2005/08/30
- Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., RP, 2005/08/30
  - Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., macromitch, 2005/08/30
  - Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/30
    - Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., TomGee, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., macromitch, 2005/08/30
    - Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., RP, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., Nick, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., RP, 2005/08/30
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., RP, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., Nick, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., RP, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., PD, 2005/08/30
- Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., Robert Kolker, 2005/08/30
- Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., Igor, 2005/08/30
Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, Raktizer Omheit, 2005/08/30
- Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/30
- Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/30
- Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, jimp, 2005/08/30
- Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, Uncle Al, 2005/08/30
- Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, Paul Cardinale, 2005/08/30
Re: Is Photon a Point Particle?, Orion, 2005/08/29
- Re: Is Photon a Point Particle?, Igor, 2005/08/30
If an equal arm scale balances, Don1, 2005/08/29
- Re: If an equal arm scale balances, donstockbauer, 2005/08/29
- Re: If an equal arm scale balances, pete, 2005/08/30
  - Re: If an equal arm scale balances, Don1, 2005/08/30
    - Re: If an equal arm scale balances, Paul Cardinale, 2005/08/30
    - Re: If an equal arm scale balances, Mark Fergerson, 2005/08/30
- Re: If an equal arm scale balances, Steve Ralph, 2005/08/30
- Re: If an equal arm scale balances, Uncle Al, 2005/08/30
Chirality and parity, Edward Green, 2005/08/29
- Re: Chirality and parity, Uncle Al, 2005/08/30
Photon Splitting Inquiry, Potte, 2005/08/29
- Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry, donstockbauer, 2005/08/29
- Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry, macromitch, 2005/08/30
- Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/30
  - Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/30
    - Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/30
Re: A basic question, Edward Green, 2005/08/29
Finding geodesic for general metric, p . scadden, 2005/08/29
Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Uncle Al, 2005/08/29
- Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Uncle Al, 2005/08/29
Re: Uncle Al re magnet wire, Uncle Al, 2005/08/29
Re: speed of gravity, Uncle Al, 2005/08/29
- Re: speed of gravity, Traveler, 2005/08/29
Re: A Theory of Knowledge or Eagleson's Logic, Uncle Al, 2005/08/29
- Re: A Theory of Knowledge or Eagleson's Logic, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/29
  - Re: A Theory of Knowledge or Eagleson's Logic, Uncle Al, 2005/08/29
Re: SFT and entanglement, Dr Photon, 2005/08/29
- Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
  - Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
    - Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
    - Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
    - Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
  - Re: SFT and entanglement, Dr Photon, 2005/08/30
    - Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, Dr Photon, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
    - Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, Dr Photon, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
- Re: SFT and entanglement, Uncle Al, 2005/08/29
  - Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
- Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
  - Re: SFT and entanglement, Dr Photon, 2005/08/30
    - Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, John Sefton, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
    - Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
Re: Stern-Gerlach experiment is not quantized, Uncle Al, 2005/08/29
- Re: Stern-Gerlach experiment is not quantized, Attila the Bum, 2005/08/29
"Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/29
- Re: "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium., Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/29
  - Re: "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/29
- Re: "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium., Dr Nanduri, 2005/08/30
- Re: "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium., Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/30
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 2005/08/29
- Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
  - Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
    - Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
    - Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, John Sefton, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, nightlight, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, nightlight, 2005/08/30
Re: Hurricane Katrina Comments and Questions TAO Jesica sank, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
Re: Hurricane Katrina Comments and Questions, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: Hurricane Katrina Comments and Questions, tj Frazir, 2005/08/30
newton's first law, francisco, 2005/08/28
- Re: newton's first law, Uncle Al, 2005/08/29
Three Little Known Amazing Observations by Three Great Inventors, rk73737, 2005/08/28
Science Equipment ID needed, R.H., 2005/08/28
- Re: Science Equipment ID needed, Mark Martin, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Science Equipment ID needed, Uncle Al, 2005/08/29
  - Re: Science Equipment ID needed, rhvp65, 2005/08/29
    - Re: Science Equipment ID needed, Mark Martin, 2005/08/29
- Message not available
  - Re: Science Equipment ID needed, rhvp65, 2005/08/29
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, T Wake, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
"The Matter of "Dark Matter", Cino, 2005/08/28
- Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
- Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/28
  - Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
- Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Uncle Al, 2005/08/28
  - Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Henry Haapalainen, 2005/08/28
Stochastic Processes: Gaussian, Second-Order, etc., OsherD, 2005/08/28
- Re: Stochastic Processes: Gaussian, Second-Order, etc., OsherD, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Stochastic Processes: Gaussian, Second-Order, etc., OsherD, 2005/08/28
Mass & inertia are equivalent, Don1, 2005/08/28
- Re: Mass & inertia are equivalent, Mike, 2005/08/28
AP assessment of his ideas; Wikipedia, a_plutonium, 2005/08/28
- Re: AP assessment of his ideas; Wikipedia, Mike, 2005/08/28
Continuous Verbal Knowledge and Continuous Universe, OsherD, 2005/08/28
- Re: Continuous Verbal Knowledge and Continuous Universe, OsherD, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Continuous Verbal Knowledge and Continuous Universe, OsherD, 2005/08/28
News regarding NASA's Webb Space Telescope, Mike, 2005/08/28
- Re: News regarding NASA's Webb Space Telescope, Uncle Al, 2005/08/28
Re: Red Shift Claim, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/28
- Re: Red Shift Claim, Dr Nanduri, 2005/08/30
spring vibrations in space, Bernhard Kuemel, 2005/08/28
- Re: spring vibrations in space, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/28
- Re: spring vibrations in space, AJW, 2005/08/28
- Re: spring vibrations in space, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/29
  - Re: spring vibrations in space, Monitek, 2005/08/30
UNCERTAiNTY Principle REDUNDANT.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/08/28
- Re: UNCERTAiNTY Principle REDUNDANT.!!, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/28
  - Re: UNCERTAiNTY Principle REDUNDANT.!!, Billinares, 2005/08/28
LiTTLE iMPs ..a GR MYSTERY.!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/08/28
- Re: LiTTLE iMPs ..a GR MYSTERY.!!, Proginoskes, 2005/08/28
UNcertainty PRiNCiPLE UNnecessary .!!, brian a m stuckless, 2005/08/28
Super-heavy magnetic vector boson predicted at the 2 TeV scale!, CFDIII, 2005/08/28
what is mind ???, Udayan, 2005/08/28
- Re: what is mind ???, Androcles, 2005/08/28
- Re: what is mind ???, tdp1001, 2005/08/28
  - Re: what is mind ???, donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
- Re: what is mind ???, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/28
  - Re: what is mind ???, Henry Haapalainen, 2005/08/28
- Re: what is mind ???, Uncle Al, 2005/08/28
Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, Bob, 2005/08/28
- Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
- Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
- Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
    - Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
    - Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
Quantum Complex Stochastics 2, OsherD, 2005/08/28
- Re: Quantum Complex Stochastics 2, OsherD, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Quantum Complex Stochastics 2, OsherD, 2005/08/28
    - Re: Quantum Complex Stochastics 2, OsherD, 2005/08/28
Light, matter, time, space; Gravity, Nick, 2005/08/28
- Re: Light, matter, time, space; Gravity, M31, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Light, matter, time, space; Gravity, Nick, 2005/08/28
- Re: Light, matter, time, space; Gravity, Nick, 2005/08/28
  - Message not available
    - Re: Light, matter, time, space; Gravity, Henry Haapalainen, 2005/08/28
Another billion dollar idea!, tdp1001, 2005/08/27
- Re: Another billion dollar idea!, Androcles, 2005/08/28
- Re: Another billion dollar idea!, Mark Martin, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Another billion dollar idea!, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
    - Re: Another billion dollar idea!, Mark Martin, 2005/08/28
- Re: Another billion dollar idea!, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: Another billion dollar idea!, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Another billion dollar idea!, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
    - Re: Another Afrimax tanker in distress gulf DUR993, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: Another billion dollar idea!, Uncle Al, 2005/08/28
Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, M31, 2005/08/27
- Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Greg Neill, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, M31, 2005/08/28
    - Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Jim Black, 2005/08/28
- Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, M31, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
- Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, M31, 2005/08/28
    - Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/28
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Uncle Al, 2005/08/29
- Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Androcles, 2005/08/28
- Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Uncle Al, 2005/08/28
Quantum Complex Stochastics, OsherD, 2005/08/27
a simple dynamic problem consultion, idyllic . math, 2005/08/27
- Re: a simple dynamic problem consultion, srp, 2005/08/28
A few questions about string theory, cyberdude, 2005/08/27
- Re: A few questions about string theory, Nick, 2005/08/27
Article: Einstein and Quantizing Chaos, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/27
Mach's Principle from Wheeler-Feynman Teleology, Jack Sarfatti, 2005/08/27
TORSION FIELDS, Jack Sarfatti, 2005/08/27
question 1, francisco, 2005/08/27
- Re: question 1, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/27
  - Re: question 1, francisco, 2005/08/27
    - Re: question 1, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/28
- Re: question 1, the softrat, 2005/08/28
Flying Saucer/Star Gate Physics Lectures, Jack Sarfatti, 2005/08/27
Simple Bernoulli question, Edward Green, 2005/08/27
My prediction is coming true: 5 devastating hurricanes for Florida 2005 due to 4 in 2004, a_plutonium, 2005/08/27
- Re: My prediction is coming true: 5 devastating hurricanes for Florida 2005 due to 4 in 2004, a_plutonium, 2005/08/28
  - Aluminum Sequin can eliminate all hurricanes in 2006 Re:, a_plutonium, 2005/08/29
    - Re: Aluminum Sequin can eliminate all hurricanes in 2006 Re:, donstockbauer, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Aluminum Sequin can eliminate all hurricanes in 2006 Re:, a_plutonium, 2005/08/30
Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships, OsherD, 2005/08/27
- Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships, OsherD, 2005/08/27
    - Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships, OsherD, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships, OsherD, 2005/08/28
The Sarfatti Lectures On The Origin of Gravity and Inertia 1 & 2, Jack Sarfatti, 2005/08/27
"Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Lecnac, 2005/08/27
- Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
- Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", the softrat, 2005/08/27
Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies, Michael Moroney, 2005/08/27
Motion consists of two kinds, Don1, 2005/08/27
- Re: Motion consists of two kinds, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Motion consists of two kinds, john_ramsden, 2005/08/27
- Re: Motion consists of two kinds, Uncle Al, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Motion consists of two kinds, tj Frazir, 2005/08/28
- Re: Motion consists of two kinds, Mike, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Motion consists of two kinds, Don1, 2005/08/28
Why the Universe Exists, Zeb Glittering, 2005/08/27
- Re: Why the Universe Exists, Uncle Al, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Why the Universe Exists, Zeb Glittering, 2005/08/28
    - Re: Why the Universe Exists, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Why the Universe Exists, Zeb Glittering, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Why the Universe Exists, Henry Haapalainen, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Why the Universe Exists, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/28
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Why the Universe Exists, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Why the Universe Exists, Zeb Glittering, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Why the Universe Exists, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Why the Universe Exists, Zeb Glittering, 2005/08/30
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Why the Universe Exists, Zeb Glittering, 2005/08/30
- Re: Why the Universe Exists, Mike, 2005/08/27
- Re: Why the Universe Exists, Rene Tschaggelar, 2005/08/29
  - Re: Why the Universe Exists, donstockbauer, 2005/08/29
simple question about heat conductivity, Aydin, 2005/08/27
Complex Probabilities, OsherD, 2005/08/27
- Message not available
  - Re: Complex Probabilities, OsherD, 2005/08/27
- Message not available
  - Re: Complex Probabilities, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/27
    - Re: Complex Probabilities, OsherD, 2005/08/27
Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature, tj Frazir, 2005/08/27
- Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/28
- Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/27
- Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/29
Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 2005/08/27
- Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 2005/08/27
    - Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 2005/08/27
- Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 2005/08/27
    - Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
- Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
- Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Uncle Al, 2005/08/27
Primes, Palindromes, and Pyramids, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
- Re: Primes, Palindromes, and Pyramids, Jim Spriggs, 2005/08/27
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 August 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/26
Reaching planck's energy, Orion, 2005/08/26
- Re: Reaching planck's energy, Akira Bergman, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Reaching planck's energy, Orion, 2005/08/27
- Re: Reaching planck's energy, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/28
How to make blue light?, Jim Spriggs, 2005/08/26
- Re: How to make blue light?, donstockbauer, 2005/08/26
  - Re: How to make blue light?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/27
- Re: How to make blue light?, jimp, 2005/08/26
  - Re: How to make blue light?, Jim Spriggs, 2005/08/27
    - Re: How to make blue light?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: How to make blue light?, peter, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: How to make blue light?, Jim Spriggs, 2005/08/27
  - Re: How to make blue light?, Ian Stirling, 2005/08/28
    - Re: How to make blue light?, jimp, 2005/08/28
- Re: How to make blue light?, John Popelish, 2005/08/26
  - Re: How to make blue light?, Jim Spriggs, 2005/08/27
- Re: How to make blue light?, Jim Spriggs, 2005/08/27
  - Re: How to make blue light?, jimp, 2005/08/27
- Re: How to make blue light?, CWatters, 2005/08/27
- Re: How to make blue light?, Uncle Al, 2005/08/27
- Re: How to make blue light?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/27
- Re: How to make blue light?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/27
  - Message not available
    - Re: How to make blue light?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/28
  - Message not available
    - Re: How to make blue light?, Jim Spriggs, 2005/08/28
- Re: How to make blue light?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/28
About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/26
- Re: About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks, Greysky, 2005/08/27
  - Re: About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
- Re: About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks, FrediFizzx, 2005/08/28
Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?, Akira Bergman, 2005/08/26
- Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?, Mike, 2005/08/29
For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Don1, 2005/08/26
- Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Eric Gisse, 2005/08/26
- Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/26
- Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Jim Spriggs, 2005/08/26
  - Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Don1, 2005/08/27
    - Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
    - Message not available
      
      Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Don1, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Randy Poe, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, PD, 2005/08/30
- Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Richard Henry, 2005/08/26
- Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/27
  - Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Don1, 2005/08/27
    - Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Don1, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/28
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/28
- Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Clemens W, 2005/08/27
- Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Clemens W, 2005/08/27
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/26
Physicists in Germany have created a material that is harder than diamond, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/26
- Re: Physicists in Germany have created a material that is harder than diamond, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/27
Re: India designs thorium reactor, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Tim Golden, 2005/08/26
- Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Androcles, 2005/08/26
- Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Akira Bergman, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Nick, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Nick, 2005/08/27
    - Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Akira Bergman, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/08/27
    - Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Akira Bergman, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/08/28
- Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, mountain man, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 2005/08/27
International Space Agency, Victoria, 2005/08/26
- Re: International Space Agency, Weatherlawyer, 2005/08/26
household physics question, at, 2005/08/26
- Re: household physics question, crowsmengegus, 2005/08/26
- Re: household physics question, crowsmengegus, 2005/08/26
  - Re: household physics question, donstockbauer, 2005/08/26
    - Re: household physics question, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: household physics question, Edward Green, 2005/08/26
- Re: household physics question, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/26
- Re: household physics question, Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
- Re: household physics question, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
PBS special "Einstein's Big Idea", The TimeLord, 2005/08/26
- Re: PBS special "Einstein's Big Idea", Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
  - Re: PBS special "Einstein's Big Idea", donstockbauer, 2005/08/26
Bohrn again, Dr Photon, 2005/08/26
"Examining Mathematical Approaches", Yrots, 2005/08/26
- Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/26
  - Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", John Sefton, 2005/08/26
    - Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", John Sefton, 2005/08/26
- Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Robert Kolker, 2005/08/26
- Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
- Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", the softrat, 2005/08/26
Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, kasterborus, 2005/08/26
- Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Zigoteau, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Jim Black, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Zigoteau, 2005/08/27
- Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/26
- Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Jim Black, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Ian Parker, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Androcles, 2005/08/26
- Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Mike, 2005/08/27
- Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Androcles, 2005/08/26
- Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, the softrat, 2005/08/26
- Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/27
GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS, ACE, 2005/08/26
- Re: GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS, donstockbauer, 2005/08/26
- Re: GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS, Dr Photon, 2005/08/26
- GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS, ACE, 2005/08/27
GRAVITY MECHANICS, ACE, 2005/08/26
Re: Yes, prof. Einstein, acceleration causes 'weight'., Luigi Caselli, 2005/08/26
Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand, AlexG, 2005/08/26
- Re: Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand, the softrat, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand, AlexG, 2005/08/28
- Re: Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand, Timo Nieminen, 2005/08/30
Re: dimension in physics, Tim Golden, 2005/08/26
- Re: dimension in physics, Tim Golden, 2005/08/26
Mechanical (Probable) Causation Uses Subtraction and Division, Not Addition or Multiplication, OsherD, 2005/08/26
- Re: Mechanical (Probable) Causation Uses Subtraction and Division, Not Addition or Multiplication, OsherD, 2005/08/26
  - Message not available
    - Re: Mechanical (Probable) Causation Uses Subtraction and Division, Not Addition or Multiplication, OsherD, 2005/08/26
neutrino wave question, special, 2005/08/26
- Re: neutrino wave question, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/26
- Re: neutrino wave question, Mark Martin, 2005/08/26
  - Re: neutrino wave question, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/27
- Re: neutrino wave question, Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Nick, 2005/08/26
- Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Jim Black, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Nick, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Jim Black, 2005/08/28
- Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, T Wake, 2005/08/26
- Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Thomas Smid, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Androcles, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Nick, 2005/08/26
Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, DARTH VADER, 2005/08/26
- Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, donstockbauer, 2005/08/26
- Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Richard Henry, 2005/08/26
- Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Mark Martin, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Mark Martin, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Mark Martin, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Richard Henry, 2005/08/26
- Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Ian Stirling, 2005/08/26
- Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, donstockbauer, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Potte, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Potte, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, jimp, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Potte, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, jimp, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Potte, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, jimp, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Richard Henry, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, donstockbauer, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Potte, 2005/08/26
- Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/26
- Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Eric Gisse, 2005/08/26
I have again answered Dr. Alan Sokal's challenge ("the Sokal hoax"), musil23, 2005/08/26
Lookin fer a fizisist, dbohara, 2005/08/25
- Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, dbohara, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
- Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
- Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, Androcles, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, dbohara, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, Androcles, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, dbohara, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, Androcles, 2005/08/27
Re: Smokers are deep thinkers. junkies hane no self_control., tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
- Re: Smokers are deep thinkers. junkies hane no self_control., T Wake, 2005/08/26
Debating Uncertainty uncertainly, smurrish, 2005/08/25
- Re: Debating Uncertainty uncertainly, Jim Black, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Debating Uncertainty uncertainly, smurrish, 2005/08/26
- Re: Debating Uncertainty uncertainly, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/26
Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., smurrish, 2005/08/25
- Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., Androcles, 2005/08/26
- Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., mmeron, 2005/08/26
- Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., Robert Kolker, 2005/08/26
- Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., Autymn D. C., 2005/08/26
Earth's inner core is rotating faster by about 0.3 to 0.5 degrees per year, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/25
- Re: Earth's inner core is rotating faster by about 0.3 to 0.5 degre..., tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Earth's inner core is rotating faster by about 0.3 to 0.5 degre..., Mark Martin, 2005/08/25
Critical breakthrough, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/25
- Re: Critical breakthrough, Y.Porat, 2005/08/26
- Critical breakthrough, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Critical breakthrough, Y.Porat, 2005/08/26
Re: Chirality and isotropy dumbass Unkie Alice, tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
- Re: Chirality and isotropy dumbass Unkie Alice, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/25
Justification of a (flat) space-time metric, Timo Nieminen, 2005/08/25
- Re: Justification of a (flat) space-time metric, Androcles, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Justification of a (flat) space-time metric, Eric Gisse, 2005/08/25
entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, Evgenij Barsukov, 2005/08/25
- Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, Ian Parker, 2005/08/25
- Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, TomGee, 2005/08/25
  - Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, Evgenij Barsukov, 2005/08/26
    - Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, Ian Parker, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, Evgenij Barsukov, 2005/08/26
- Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/25
Help me with this real life story problem, jackjohansson, 2005/08/25
- Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Richard Henry, 2005/08/25
- Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Randy Poe, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Help me with this real life story problem, CWatters, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Richard Henry, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Uncle Al, 2005/08/25
- Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Uncle Al, 2005/08/25
- Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/25
- Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Androcles, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Help me with this real life story problem, tdp1001, 2005/08/26
NATURE article about dust affecting climate; Aluminum Sequin as Earth Air Conditioner, a_plutonium, 2005/08/25
- Re: NATURE article about dust affecting climate; Aluminum Sequin as Earth Air Conditioner, Roger Coppock, 2005/08/25
- Re: NATURE article about dust affecting climate; Aluminum Sequin as Earth Air Conditioner, a_plutonium, 2005/08/26
  - Re: NATURE article about dust affecting climate; Aluminum Sequin as Earth Air Conditioner, dcholiman, 2005/08/30
The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/25
- Re: The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape, Richard Henry, 2005/08/25
  - Re: The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/25
- Re: The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape, Uncle Al, 2005/08/25
- Re: The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/26
Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless, meltedown, 2005/08/25
- Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/25
- Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless, Richard Miller, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless, Androcles, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/26
posting 20050825, renjiro_c, 2005/08/25
I have made Einstein's 1925 writings on the Bose-Einstein condensate available as 1 indexed pdf file for download., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/25
"The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Pup, 2005/08/25
- Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Uncle Al, 2005/08/25
- Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/25
  - Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Traveler, 2005/08/25
    - Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Richard Miller, 2005/08/25
- Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Richard Miller, 2005/08/25
  - Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/26
Check out "Weird pictures will fool you" in alt.binaries.pictures.misc, TokaMundo, 2005/08/25
photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 2005/08/25
- Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Dr Photon, 2005/08/25
  - Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 2005/08/26
    - Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Dr Photon, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Potte, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Potte, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/29
- Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, John Sefton, 2005/08/25
  - Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 2005/08/26
    - Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, John Sefton, 2005/08/26
- Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/26
- Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Y.Porat, 2005/08/27
  - Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 2005/08/27
    - Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Y.Porat, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Y.Porat, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/27
      
      Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Y.Porat, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/28
      
      Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Y.Porat, 2005/08/28
Mach's Principle and Negative Gravity, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 2005/08/25
- Re: Mach's Principle and Negative Gravity, donstockbauer, 2005/08/25
- Re: Mach's Principle and Negative Gravity, shevek, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Mach's Principle and Negative Gravity, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/26
    - Re: Mach's Principle and Negative Gravity, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 2005/08/27
COUNT THE STARS CON-TEST EXTENDED -- 2004 Hubble Ultra View - Universe - Space - Galaxies - Evolution or Intelligent Design?, Ed Conrad, 2005/08/25
[More on: part 3] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/25
- Re: [More on: part 3] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., TomGee, 2005/08/25
material coherence: approximation for large n where n is the number of atoms, tony fleming, 2005/08/25
- Re: material coherence: approximation for large n where n is the number of atoms, Uncle Al, 2005/08/25
  - Re: material coherence: approximation for large n where n is the number of atoms, tony fleming, 2005/08/25
The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited....., S. Enterprize Company, 2005/08/25
- Re: The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited....., S. Enterprize Company, 2005/08/25
  - Re: The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited....., Y.Porat, 2005/08/25
    - Re: The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited....., S. Enterprize Company, 2005/08/25
  - Re: The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited....., S. Enterprize Company, 2005/08/25
Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Golden Boar, 2005/08/25
- Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Rene Tschaggelar, 2005/08/25
- Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/25
- Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, PD, 2005/08/25
- Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Jon Bell, 2005/08/25
- Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Golden Boar, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Jon Bell, 2005/08/27
    - Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Golden Boar, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Golden Boar, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Aydin, 2005/08/27
  - Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, PD, 2005/08/27
    - Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, the softrat, 2005/08/28
How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, the softrat, 2005/08/25
- Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, mmeron, 2005/08/25
  - Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, the softrat, 2005/08/25
    - Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, the softrat, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, mmeron, 2005/08/25
  - Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, Mark Martin, 2005/08/25
    - Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, mmeron, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, the softrat, 2005/08/26
- Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/25
  - Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, Randy Poe, 2005/08/25
    - Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, Randy Poe, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, the softrat, 2005/08/25
    - Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, Dr. Zarkov, 2005/08/25
- Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, markwh04, 2005/08/25
Lost Causes By King's College's Streater v.s. PI, OsherD, 2005/08/25
- Re: Lost Causes By King's College's Streater v.s. PI, OsherD, 2005/08/25
United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
- Re: United Nations moving to China!, Nick, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, Polish Prince $Szynka$, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, dan, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, mmeron, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Chance Hopkins, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, mmeron, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Chance Hopkins, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, dan, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Billy, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, mmeron, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, mmeron, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, mmeron, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Richard Henry, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, dan, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Richard Henry, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, cLIeNUX user, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, <SmirkS>, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, cLIeNUX user, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, <SmirkS>, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, dan, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, Winston Smith, American Patriot, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, Lappcatt, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, Crash, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, Androcles, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, Mamamia, 2005/08/25
    - Message not available
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Crash, 2005/08/25
- Re: United Nations moving to China!, CWatters, 2005/08/25
- Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Traveler, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 2005/08/28
- Re: United Nations moving to China!, Billy, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, dan, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, Billy, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, Billy, 2005/08/25
- Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
- Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 2005/08/26
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 2005/08/28
- Re: United Nations moving to China!, Chuck Feney, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 2005/08/28
- Message not available
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, Tom B. Stone, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
- Re: United Nations moving to China!, Uncle Al, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
- Re: United Nations moving to China!, markwh04, 2005/08/25
  - Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 2005/08/28
    - Re: United Nations moving to China!, markwh04, 2005/08/26
Induction cookers, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
- Re: Induction cookers, Uncle Al, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Induction cookers, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Induction cookers, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Induction cookers, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Induction cookers, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/26
- Re: Induction cookers, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Induction cookers, T Wake, 2005/08/26
- Re: Induction cookers, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Induction cookers, donstockbauer, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Induction cookers, tdp1001, 2005/08/26
- Message not available
  - Re: Induction cookers, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/29
H numbers, Akira Bergman, 2005/08/24
- Re: H numbers, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
- Re: H numbers, Jim Black, 2005/08/25
  - Re: H numbers, Akira Bergman, 2005/08/26
    - Re: H numbers, Jim Black, 2005/08/26
Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
- Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, T Wake, 2005/08/26
- Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, T Wake, 2005/08/26
- Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, T Wake, 2005/08/26
Gravity Probe B guy promoted to NASA associate administrator, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
- Re: Gravity Probe B guy promoted to NASA associate administrator, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/25
New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics, Jay R. Yablon, 2005/08/24
- Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics, Dr Photon, 2005/08/25
  - Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics, Jay R. Yablon, 2005/08/25
    - Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics, Dr Photon, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics, FrediFizzx, 2005/08/26
Yet another entropy paradox..., Edward Green, 2005/08/24
- Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Autymn D. C., 2005/08/25
- Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., the softrat, 2005/08/25
- Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Uncle Al, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., michaeld, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Edward Green, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., michaeld, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., michaeld, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Andy Resnick, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., John Sefton, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Edward Green, 2005/08/28
      
      Sprinkler cools dog days..., Edward Green, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Sprinkler cools dog days..., Andy Resnick, 2005/08/30
- Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Ken Muldrew, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Edward Green, 2005/08/25
- Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., michaeld, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Edward Green, 2005/08/26
Re: Tracking uranium., tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
- Re: Tracking uranium., James "Kibo" Parry, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Tracking uranium., tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Potte, 2005/08/24
- Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, hanson, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, donstockbauer, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 2005/08/25
- Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 2005/08/24
- Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Potte, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 2005/08/25
- Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 2005/08/25
- Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 2005/08/25
- Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Uncle Al, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Orion, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 2005/08/25
- Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Androcles, 2005/08/25
SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 2005/08/24
- Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/25
  - Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 2005/08/26
    - Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', John Sefton, 2005/08/26
    - Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 2005/08/28
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/30
Re: Earn 12% daily of your investment!!!, Androcles, 2005/08/24
Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Potte, 2005/08/24
- Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Traveler, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Potte, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Traveler, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/28
- Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/25
  - Message not available
    - Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Orion, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Orion, 2005/08/26
- Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Dr Photon, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, John Sefton, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Potte, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, John Sefton, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, John Sefton, 2005/08/28
- Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Edward Green, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/27
Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, Potte, 2005/08/24
- Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, jtuzo, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, jtuzo, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, tony fleming, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, tony fleming, 2005/08/25
- Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, tony fleming, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, Potte, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, tony fleming, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, tony fleming, 2005/08/25
- Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, Eugene Stefanovich, 2005/08/25
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 11, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/24
- Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 11, Uncle Al, 2005/08/24
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement no. 10, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/24
- Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement no. 10, Uncle Al, 2005/08/24
Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 2005/08/24
- Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Craig Franck, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Edward Green, 2005/08/25
      
      Message not available
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Edward Green, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 2005/08/25
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 2005/08/29
- Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 2005/08/24
- Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 2005/08/28
  - Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Jim Spriggs, 2005/08/29
- Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/28
posting 20050824, renjiro_c, 2005/08/24
Pressure as a measure of capacity, CWatters, 2005/08/24
- Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
- Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, Martin, 2005/08/24
- Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, Paul Cardinale, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, CWatters, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, Uncle Al, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, James Copeland, 2005/08/24
- Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
- Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, Uncle Al, 2005/08/24
On light aberration, None, 2005/08/24
What is empty space made of, footballdvds, 2005/08/24
- Re: What is empty space made of, Traveler, 2005/08/24
- Re: What is empty space made of, Richard Henry, 2005/08/24
- Re: What is empty space made of, Mark Martin, 2005/08/24
- Re: What is empty space made of, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
  - Re: What is empty space made of, footballdvds, 2005/08/24
  - Re: What is empty space made of, Akira Bergman, 2005/08/27
- Re: What is empty space made of, Paul Cardinale, 2005/08/24
  - Re: What is empty space made of dark energy at c, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
    - Re: What is empty space made of dark energy at c, T Wake, 2005/08/24
- Re: What is empty space made of, Uncle Al, 2005/08/24
- Re: What is empty space made of, TomGee, 2005/08/24
- Re: What is empty space made of, Nick, 2005/08/24
  - Re: What is empty space made of, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
    - Re: What is empty space made of, Nick, 2005/08/25
- Re: What is empty space made of, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
- Re: What is empty space made of, Y.Porat, 2005/08/28
pressure dependence of thermal conductivity, Max Hofmann, 2005/08/24
- Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/24
- Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity, CWatters, 2005/08/24
  - Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
  - Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/25
- Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/25
Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY, Sleepyhead, 2005/08/24
- Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY, tomcat, 2005/08/24
  - Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY, Sleepyhead, 2005/08/25
    - Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY, tomcat, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY, Sleepyhead, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY, tomcat, 2005/08/26
"The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Gnak, 2005/08/24
- Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
- Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Uncle Al, 2005/08/24
From today's (8-24-05) Des Moines Register -- Stick to Science, ISU, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
Police Armor Penetration Loading- I found this, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/24
- Re: Police Armor Penetration Loading- I found this, Uncle Al, 2005/08/24
Bohmians/Modified Bohmians Admit rho = /w/^2 Often False, OsherD, 2005/08/24
- Re: Bohmians/Modified Bohmians Admit rho = /w/^2 Often False, OsherD, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Bohmians/Modified Bohmians Admit rho = /w/^2 Often False, OsherD, 2005/08/24
Calc. angle between two azimuth values, ectoplasm, 2005/08/24
- Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, ectoplasm, 2005/08/24
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, mmeron, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, John C . Polasek, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Androcles, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Timo Nieminen, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Androcles, 2005/08/24
Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 2005/08/23
- Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Androcles, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, bz, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Androcles, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, bz, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Orion, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 2005/08/27
- Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims,..., tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims,..., T Wake, 2005/08/26
Re: I'm an anti_junkie., tj Frazir, 2005/08/23
- Re: I'm an anti_junkie., tj Frazir, 2005/08/23
Chirality and isotropy, Edward Green, 2005/08/23
- Re: Chirality and isotropy, mountain man, 2005/08/23
- Re: Chirality and isotropy, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/24
- Re: Chirality and isotropy, monika hohlmeier, 2005/08/24
- Re: Chirality and isotropy, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Chirality and isotropy, Edward Green, 2005/08/24
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Attila the Bum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Attila the Bum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Attila the Bum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, T Wake, 2005/08/27
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Zigoteau, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Zigoteau, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Zigoteau, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Edward Green, 2005/08/28
      
      Message not available
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, srp, 2005/08/29
      
      Message not available
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Richard Schultz, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, brian a m stuckless, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, tj Frazir, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Chirality and isotropy, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, hanson, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Chirality and isotropy, hanson, 2005/08/28
- Re: Chirality and isotropy, hanson, 2005/08/24
- Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/24
posting 20050823, renjiro_c, 2005/08/23
^ drag force on an object on an automobile, aguy, 2005/08/23
- Re: ^ drag force on an object on an automobile, Timo Nieminen, 2005/08/23
- Re: ^ drag force on an object on an automobile, CWatters, 2005/08/24
  - Re: ^ drag force on an object on an automobile, the softrat, 2005/08/25
experiment with fluids, Tony Johansson, 2005/08/23
- Re: experiment with fluids, Steven Gray, 2005/08/23
- Re: experiment with fluids, Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
- Re: experiment with fluids, the softrat, 2005/08/23
Gravity Probe B, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/23
- Re: Gravity Probe B, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/08/23
- Re: Gravity Probe B, Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Gravity Probe B, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Gravity Probe B, Uncle Al, 2005/08/24
- Re: Gravity Probe B, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/24
Proper Time, Nick, 2005/08/23
- Re: Proper Time, T Wake, 2005/08/23
- Re: Proper Time, Jim Black, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Proper Time, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Proper Time, tj Frazir, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proper Time, Nick, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proper Time, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proper Time, Nick, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Proper Time, T Wake, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Proper Time, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/24
- Re: Proper Time, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Proper Time, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe -, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/23
- Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe -, tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe -, T Wake, 2005/08/25
Shadow Universe Trespasses, e8xe8, 2005/08/23
- Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, e8xe8, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, john_ramsden, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, e8xe8, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Mark Martin, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, e8xe8, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Mark Martin, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, e8xe8, 2005/08/26
- Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Mark Martin, 2005/08/23
- Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
- Message not available
  - Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/25
- Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, e8xe8, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/25
- Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Nick, 2005/08/25
Who I'd like to hire, dbohara, 2005/08/23
- Re: Who I'd like to hire, T Wake, 2005/08/23
- Re: Who I'd like to hire, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Who I'd like to hire, Math Freak, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Who I'd like to hire, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Who I'd like to hire, T Wake, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Who I'd like to hire, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/24
- Re: Who I'd like to hire, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/24
- Re: Who I'd like to hire, PD, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Who I'd like to hire to put oars on boats, tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Who I'd like to hire to put oars on boats, tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Who I'd like to hire to put oars on boats, T Wake, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Who I'd like to hire, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/25
Need help on "Basic" concept, astroboy, 2005/08/23
- Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, astroboy, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/24
- Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, C6L1V, 2005/08/23
- Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Androcles, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Androcles, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, PD, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/24
- Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
- Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, the softrat, 2005/08/23
  - Message not available
    - Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, the softrat, 2005/08/24
- Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, John C . Polasek, 2005/08/23
Re: More on ether, Re: Discussions on relativity., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 8, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/23
- Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 8, Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
- Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 8, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/23
Fibres control the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
- Re: Fibres control the speed of light, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2005/08/24
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Immortalist, 2005/08/23
- here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 2005/08/23
  - Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/08/24
    - Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 2005/08/24
  - Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Dr. Zarkov, 2005/08/24
    - Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Dr. Zarkov, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, tooly, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 2005/08/29
- Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, BuddhaThu, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/25
- Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, boo, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Androcles, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, boo, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Androcles, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, donstockbauer, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, boo, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Androcles, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Gary Childress, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Gary Childress, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, RP, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Traveler, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, boo, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, boo, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 2005/08/26
- Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, boofreak, 2005/08/26
LIGO is coming into operation in stages, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
- Re: LIGO is coming into operation in stages, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/23
  - Re: LIGO is coming into operation in stages, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
    - Re: LIGO is coming into operation in stages, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: LIGO is coming into operation in stages, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
Re: The moment is all anyone ever had., tj Frazir, 2005/08/23
- Re: The moment is all anyone ever had., Mark Martin, 2005/08/23
  - Re: The moment is all anyone ever had., tj Frazir, 2005/08/23
    - Re: The moment is all anyone ever had., T Wake, 2005/08/23
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 7, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/23
- Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 7, Androcles, 2005/08/23
  - Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 7, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/23
- Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 7, Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?, kasterborus, 2005/08/23
- Re: Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?, James Copeland, 2005/08/23
- Re: Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?, Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?, TokaMundo, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?, Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
"The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Sserdda, 2005/08/23
- Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
- Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
Lens Fabrication, Camilo, 2005/08/23
- Re: Lens Fabrication, donstockbauer, 2005/08/23
- Re: Lens Fabrication, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
- Re: Lens Fabrication, Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Lens Fabrication, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Lens Fabrication, James Copeland, 2005/08/23
- Re: Lens Fabrication, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/23
[More on: part 2] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/23
- Re: [More on: part 2] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/23
  - Re: [More on: part 2] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Greysky, 2005/08/23
Re: Thermal Inductance, s.morra, 2005/08/23
- Re: Thermal Inductance, AJW, 2005/08/23
Re: What are these symbols in this formula?, yotango, 2005/08/23
- Re: What are these symbols in this formula?, yotango, 2005/08/23
- Re: What are these symbols in this formula?, curiousjohn4, 2005/08/26
Re: Another Vietnam/Iraq Parallel (GOP, The Party of Treason), tj Frazir, 2005/08/23
- Re: Another Vietnam/Iraq Parallel (GOP, The Party of Treason), T Wake, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Another Vietnam/Iraq Parallel (GOP, The Party of Treason), tj Frazir, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Another Vietnam/Iraq Parallel (GOP, The Party of Treason), T Wake, 2005/08/23
Re: The truth is YOUR ALL ING STUPID, tj Frazir, 2005/08/22
- Re: The truth is YOUR ALL ING STUPID, TokaMundo, 2005/08/23
  - Re: The truth is YOUR ALL ING STUPID, tj Frazir, 2005/08/23
    - Re: The truth is YOUR ALL ING STUPID, T Wake, 2005/08/24
why can't fields be quantized too?, flames, 2005/08/22
- Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/23
  - Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, flames, 2005/08/23
    - Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, feuerbac, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, donstockbauer, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, donstockbauer, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tfleming1, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tfleming1, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, mmeron, 2005/08/24
    - Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/23
    - Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/23
- Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/23
- Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/23
  - Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tfleming1, 2005/08/23
    - Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tfleming1, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/25
    - Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/28
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/22
- Message not available
  - Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Jim Lovejoy, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Dave Thompson, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, greg byshenk, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Take this bullshit outa here dumb s, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Take this bullshit outa here dumb s, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Take this bullshit outa here dumb s, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Take this bullshit outa here dumb s, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Take this bullshit 1000 post of worthless crap, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Take this bullshit 1000 post of worthless crap, TokaMundo, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Take this bullshit 1000 post of worthless crap, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Take this bullshit 1000 post of worthless crap, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Go to alt ing stupid asses, tj Frazir, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/28
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/28
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Clave, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/28
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Clave, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Max Masters!!!, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Mitchell Holman, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Baxter, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Don Homuth, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Don Homuth, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/23
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/24
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lady Chatterly, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Al Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, greg byshenk, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Shatzer, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Shatzer, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Dave Thompson, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Max Masters!!!, 2005/08/23
- Message not available
  - Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, the softrat, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Max Masters!!!, 2005/08/23
- Message not available
  - Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Max Masters!!!, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/23
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Baxter, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Scratch, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Scratch, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Al Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Al Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Clave, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Al Smith, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Dave Thompson, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Shatzer, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Al Smith, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Clave, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Max Masters!!!, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 2005/08/26
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Dave Thompson, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Message not available
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Dave Thompson, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 2005/08/24
- Message not available
  - Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 2005/08/26
Noble gasses in windows, newsgroups.comcast.net, 2005/08/22
- Re: Noble gasses in windows, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Noble gasses in windows, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Noble gasses in windows, tj Frazir, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Noble gasses in windows, the softrat, 2005/08/23
- Message not available
  - Re: Noble gasses in windows, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Noble gasses in windows, jimp, 2005/08/22
- Re: Noble gasses in windows, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/22
  - Thanks was Re: Noble gasses in windows, newsgroups.comcast.net, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Thanks was Re: Noble gasses in windows, tj Frazir, 2005/08/23
Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/22
- Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Paul Cardinale, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/23
- Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/22
- Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Eric Gisse, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Jon Slaughter, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, tadchem, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Eric Gisse, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Eric Gisse, 2005/08/23
- Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Clemens W, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Clemens W, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, PD, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, PD, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Tomas Hokenberi, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, PD, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Clemens W, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, tadchem, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Dik T. Winter, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Eric Gisse, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Nick, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, T Wake, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Martin, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Mark lman, 2005/08/24
- Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, schoenfeld1, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/23
- Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Jim Spriggs, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 2005/08/23
Reason for high presssure in air liquifier, Jeremy Samuels, 2005/08/22
Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg 4: The "Generalized HUP", OsherD, 2005/08/22
- Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg 4: The "Generalized HUP", OsherD, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg 4: The "Generalized HUP", OsherD, 2005/08/22
Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/22
- Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Eugene Stefanovich, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Androcles, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Eric Gisse, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Eugene Stefanovich, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., TomGee, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/23
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/24
- Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Schoenfeld, 2005/08/24
- Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., boo, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Androcles, 2005/08/26
    - Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., the softrat, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., PD, 2005/08/26
- Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Autymn D. C., 2005/08/27
  - Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/28
    - Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Androcles, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Androcles, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Androcles, 2005/08/28
    - Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Autymn D. C., 2005/08/28
Re: Allais effect and 1999's tests update, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/22
- Re: Allais effect and 1999's tests update, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/22
- Re: Allais effect and 1999's tests update, mountain man, 2005/08/22
Thermal physics - bizarre question of the day., paul, 2005/08/22
- Re: Thermal physics - bizarre question of the day., Uncle Al, 2005/08/22
Worth of a PhD, dbohara, 2005/08/22
- Re: Worth of a PhD, Randy Poe, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Worth of a PhD, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/23
- Re: Worth of a PhD, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/22
- Re: Worth of a PhD, Androcles, 2005/08/22
- Re: Worth of a PhD, Rene Tschaggelar, 2005/08/22
- Re: Worth of a PhD, Uncle Al, 2005/08/22
- Re: Worth of a PhD, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/23
- Re: Worth of a PhD, carlip-nospam, 2005/08/23
- Re: Worth of a PhD, PD, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Worth of a PhD, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/25
Re: Microscopic reversibility, Ken Muldrew, 2005/08/22
All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 2005/08/22
- Re: All science was once philosophy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/22
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, unrestrained_hand, 2005/08/22
    - Re: All science was once philosophy, Seeker is my , 2005/08/22
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 2005/08/25
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, WCB, 2005/08/22
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, Nick, 2005/08/22
    - Re: All science was once philosophy, PerfectlyAble, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/23
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, mountain man, 2005/08/22
    - Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/23
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 2005/08/23
    - Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/27
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/23
- Re: All science was once philosophy, Jim07D5, 2005/08/22
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, Matt Silberstein, 2005/08/22
    - Re: All science was once philosophy, Jim07D5, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, donstockbauer, 2005/08/22
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, mountain man, 2005/08/22
    - Re: All science was once philosophy, Matt Silberstein, 2005/08/22
- Re: All science was once philosophy, BuddhaThu, 2005/08/22
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, BuddhaThu, 2005/08/22
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/22
    - Re: All science was once philosophy, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, WCB, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, WCB, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, WCB, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Tron, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Tron, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Tron, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mmeron, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mmeron, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Matthew Lybanon, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/25
    - Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 2005/08/23
    - Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/23
    - Re: All science was once philosophy, Richo, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: All science was once philosophy, m . richardson, 2005/08/26
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, Joseki, 2005/08/22
- Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/22
- Re: All science was once philosophy, Witziges R�tsel, 2005/08/22
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/22
    - Re: All science was once philosophy, Jim07D5, 2005/08/22
- Re: All science was once philosophy, Edward Green, 2005/08/22
- Re: All science was once philosophy, Roger, 2005/08/22
- Isaac Newton, maff, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Isaac Newton, zzbunker, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Isaac Newton, Immortalist, 2005/08/23
- Re: All science was once philosophy, maff, 2005/08/23
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 2005/08/24
- Re: All science was once philosophy, Richo, 2005/08/24
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 2005/08/24
    - Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/24
- Re: All science was once philosophy, Codebreaker, 2005/08/25
- Re: All science was once philosophy, MobyDikc, 2005/08/25
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 2005/08/25
  - Re: All science was once philosophy, Tron, 2005/08/27
Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity, d_hainz, 2005/08/22
- Re: Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity, mountain man, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity, John Sefton, 2005/08/23
60 GB IPOD deal found, acquient, 2005/08/22
"How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Rettel, 2005/08/22
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Uncle Al, 2005/08/22
  - Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Traveler, 2005/08/22
- Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/22
  - Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", donstockbauer, 2005/08/22
    - Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Helmut Wabnig, 2005/08/22
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/22
- Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, brian a m stuckless, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bilge, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/26
- Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/25
- Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bilge, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bilge, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bilge, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/29
- Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/25
Re: Polly wants a cracker., Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/22
- Re: Polly wants a cracker., Zigoteau, 2005/08/22
Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Bilge, 2005/08/22
- Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Richard Herring, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Richard Herring, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, jimp, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Bilge, 2005/08/22
Proof for Supremre Being, Freshwater Spaceman, 2005/08/22
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, donstockbauer, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, donstockbauer, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, chibiabos, 2005/08/23
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Michael Gray, 2005/08/22
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Jim07D5, 2005/08/22
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Don Kresch, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Tim Golden, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, 1Z, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Tim Golden, 2005/08/26
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Publius, 2005/08/22
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, PLaToPeS, 2005/08/22
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Michael Gray, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre [sic] Being, human, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Ph�lt�r, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Don Kresch, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Don Kresch, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Ph�lt�r, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Don Kresch, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Michael Gray, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Don Kresch, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 2005/08/25
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Freshwater Spaceman, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Message not available
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Bob Cain, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Bob Cain, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, PLaToPeS, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Michael Gray, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Dutch, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Michael Gray, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, donstockbauer, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, DanielSan, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Dutch, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Dutch, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Michael Gray, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Harry F . Leopold, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Richo, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Jim07D5, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, PLaToPeS, 2005/08/24
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Dave, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Freshwater Spaceman, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, tomcat, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, 1Z, 2005/08/24
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, mimus, 2005/08/23
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Richo, 2005/08/23
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, stoney, 2005/08/24
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/24
- Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 2005/08/23
A true sequence of events?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/22
- Re: A true sequence of events?, dirkbontes, 2005/08/22
- Re: A true sequence of events?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/22
  - Re: A true sequence of events?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/22
    - Re: A true sequence of events?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/22
    - Re: A true sequence of events?, dirkbontes, 2005/08/22
  - Re: A true sequence of events?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/22
- Re: A true sequence of events?, Igor, 2005/08/22
  - Re: A true sequence of events?, Androcles, 2005/08/23
    - Re: A true sequence of events?, Igor, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: A true sequence of events?, Androcles, 2005/08/23
EC-funded Research Visits: Application Deadline 31/08/2005, europa, 2005/08/22
Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., kurdayon, 2005/08/22
- Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., kurdayon, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., kurdayon, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Zigoteau, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., kurdayon, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Zigoteau, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., kurdayon, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Zigoteau, 2005/08/24
- Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., kurdayon, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/23
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, August 22, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2005/08/22
Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers, OsherD, 2005/08/22
- Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers, OsherD, 2005/08/22
  - Message not available
    - Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers, OsherD, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers, OsherD, 2005/08/22
Nuclear transformation energy, mike3, 2005/08/22
- Re: Nuclear transformation energy, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/22
- Re: Nuclear transformation energy, Y.Porat, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Nuclear transformation energy, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/22
Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory 2: Remedies, OsherD, 2005/08/22
- Re: Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory 2: Remedies, OsherD, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory 2: Remedies, OsherD, 2005/08/22
Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., John Sefton, 2005/08/21
- Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., mountain man, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Gravity travels at 33.33 repeat lightspeed., mountain man, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Gravity travels at 33.33 repeat lightspeed., Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Gravity travels at 33.33 repeat lightspeed., John Sefton, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Gravity travels at 33.33 repeat lightspeed., John Sefton, 2005/08/22
      
      How fast does conventional wisdom say electrons radiate?, John Sefton, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/22
- Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 2005/08/22
- Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
- Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., Uncle Al, 2005/08/22
- Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., PD, 2005/08/22
ozone formation, Zdenek Sperling, 2005/08/21
- Re: ozone formation, Uncle Al, 2005/08/22
  - Re: ozone formation, Zdenek Sperling, 2005/08/23
Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory, OsherD, 2005/08/21
- Re: Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory, OsherD, 2005/08/21
Re: The truth is meant to be known, Dave, 2005/08/21
- Re: The truth is meant to be known, macromitch, 2005/08/21
  - Re: The truth is meant to be known, DanielSan, 2005/08/22
- Re: The truth is meant to be known, Lady Chatterly, 2005/08/23
  - Re: The truth is meant to be known, Nick, 2005/08/23
- Re: The truth is meant to be known, Lady Chatterly, 2005/08/24
- Re: The truth is meant to be known, T Wake, 2005/08/24
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 2005/08/21
- Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: �� , T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: �� , T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: �� , T Wake, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: �� , T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/24
      
      Re: �� , T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, James "Kibo" Parry, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Re: �� , T Wake, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Re: Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, James "Kibo" Parry, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Re: Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: �� , BR, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: �� , T Wake, 2005/08/24
Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) 2: 2003 Paper, OsherD, 2005/08/21
- Message not available
  - Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) 2: 2003 Paper, OsherD, 2005/08/21
A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, rfraning, 2005/08/21
- Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/21
  - Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Graham J Lee, 2005/08/21
    - Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Graham J Lee, 2005/08/22
- Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Uncle Al, 2005/08/21
  - Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Androcles, 2005/08/21
  - Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/22
    - Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, donstockbauer, 2005/08/22
- Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Mark Martin, 2005/08/21
- Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, John Sefton, 2005/08/21
  - Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/21
- Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 2005/08/22
separable Hilbert space, David Macmanus, 2005/08/21
- Re: separable Hilbert space, michaeld, 2005/08/21
  - Re: separable Hilbert space, David Macmanus, 2005/08/21
    - Re: separable Hilbert space, michaeld, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: separable Hilbert space, Edward Green, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: separable Hilbert space, michaeld, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: separable Hilbert space, David Macmanus, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: separable Hilbert space, Nick, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: separable Hilbert space, michaeld, 2005/08/24
  - Re: separable Hilbert space, Edward Green, 2005/08/21
    - Re: separable Hilbert space, michaeld, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: separable Hilbert space, Edward Green, 2005/08/22
- Re: separable Hilbert space, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
  - Re: separable Hilbert space, David Macmanus, 2005/08/22
Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP), OsherD, 2005/08/21
quantum spaces, David Macmanus, 2005/08/21
- Re: quantum spaces, michaeld, 2005/08/21
  - Re: quantum spaces, michaeld, 2005/08/22
- Re: quantum spaces, Edward Green, 2005/08/21
  - Re: quantum spaces, David Macmanus, 2005/08/21
    - Re: quantum spaces, Edward Green, 2005/08/21
Why can't this be done?, mike3, 2005/08/21
- Re: Why can't this be done?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/21
- Re: Why can't this be done?, Uncle Al, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Why can't this be done?, macromitch, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Why can't this be done?, T Wake, 2005/08/22
- Re: Why can't this be done?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Why can't this be done?, mike3, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Why can't this be done?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/21
- Re: Why can't this be done?, Mike, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Why can't this be done?, mike3, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Why can't this be done?, mmeron, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Why can't this be done?, mike3, 2005/08/23
- Message not available
  - Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Autymn D. C., 2005/08/22
    - Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Y.Porat, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Autymn D. C., 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Y.Porat, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Autymn D. C., 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Y.Porat, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Autymn D. C., 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Y.Porat, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Autymn D. C., 2005/08/26
test, donstockbauer, 2005/08/21
- Re: test, donstockbauer, 2005/08/21
- test, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/24
  - Re: test, John Zinni, 2005/08/24
- test, John Sefton, 2005/08/26
This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/21
- Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/21
  - Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Androcles, 2005/08/21
    - Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Androcles, 2005/08/21
  - Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/21
    - Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Androcles, 2005/08/21
- Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Androcles, 2005/08/21
  - Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/21
    - Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Androcles, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Androcles, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/22
The Republican War Against Science (A New Book), W. Watson, 2005/08/21
- Re: The Republican War Against Science (A New Book), Uncle Al, 2005/08/21
  - Re: The Republican War Against Science (A New Book), Robert Kolker, 2005/08/23
- The Ethical War Against Stem Cells, Nick, 2005/08/21
  - Re: The Ethical War Against Stem Cells, Mark Martin, 2005/08/21
Re: Did The Big Bang Really Happen? YES!, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/21
- Re: Did The Big Bang Really Happen? YES!, T Wake, 2005/08/21
Original Einstein manuscript from 1924 surfaces: "Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases -- Zweite Abhandlung", and more on the US PhD, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/21
- Re: Original Einstein manuscript from 1924 surfaces: "Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases -- Zweite Abhandlung", and more on the US PhD, James Copeland, 2005/08/21
"The Paradox of Zeno", Http, 2005/08/21
- Re: "The Paradox of Zeno", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/21
- Re: "The Paradox of Zeno", Uncle Al, 2005/08/21
- "The Paradox of Zeno", Http, 2005/08/21
Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Don1, 2005/08/21
- Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/21
- Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/21
- Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Don1, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Steve Ralph, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, donstockbauer, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Inertia: the measure of energy in a body, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
- Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Steve Ralph, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Don1, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Don1, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Don1, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Don1, 2005/08/22
Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Kyle, 2005/08/21
- Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Jim Black, 2005/08/21
  - Message not available
    - Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 2005/08/21
  - Message not available
    - Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 2005/08/21
- Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Y.Porat, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Zigoteau, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Y.Porat, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Zigoteau, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Y.Porat, 2005/08/22
- Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Uncle Al, 2005/08/21
- Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, TomGee, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, TomGee, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, John Sefton, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, TomGee, 2005/08/22
- Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, John Sefton, 2005/08/30
Variance of Quantum Operators is Incorrectly Defined, OsherD, 2005/08/21
- Re: Variance of Quantum Operators is Incorrectly Defined, OsherD, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Variance of Quantum Operators is Incorrectly Defined, OsherD, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Variance of Quantum Operators is Incorrectly Defined, OsherD, 2005/08/21
Re: problem, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/20
proton-proton coulomb repulsion inquiry, Kyle, 2005/08/20
- Re: proton-proton coulomb repulsion inquiry, FrediFizzx, 2005/08/20
- Re: proton-proton coulomb repulsion inquiry, tdp1001, 2005/08/21
Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/20
- Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark, Greysky, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
    - Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark, Greysky, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/22
please help me to get a AIP conference paper, thanks., Zhen Song, 2005/08/20
- Re: please help me to get a AIP conference paper, thanks., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
Get A Desktop PC For FREE!! - Completely Legit!!, bryandrinks, 2005/08/20
- Re: Get A Desktop PC For FREE!! - Completely Legit!!, NightsoilDalits@RyugyongHotel, 2005/08/21
Re: Nuclear Secrets, Math Freak, 2005/08/20
- Re: Nuclear Secrets, the softrat, 2005/08/20
Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time, tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
- Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time, TomGee, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/24
    - Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time, TomGee, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time, Androcles, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/25
Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 2005/08/20
- Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, paranormal, 2005/08/20
- Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, T Wake, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, john_ramsden, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Pyriform, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Pyriform, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Bob Cain, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Nick, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, T Wake, 2005/08/21
- Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/20
  - Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Bob Cain, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Bob Cain, 2005/08/22
- Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Uncle Al, 2005/08/20
- Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Androcles, 2005/08/20
- Message not available
  - Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/21
- Message not available
  - Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
    - Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
- Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Peter Kinane, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/22
Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, markwh04, 2005/08/20
- Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, Mike, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
- Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, David, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, Mike, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, David, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, Mike, 2005/08/20
- Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, Math Freak, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, Mike, 2005/08/20
A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Smc, 2005/08/20
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
lenses, Joe Drake, 2005/08/20
- Re: lenses, Androcles, 2005/08/20
- Re: lenses, Charles, 2005/08/20
- Re: lenses, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
- Re: lenses, CWatters, 2005/08/20
- Re: lenses, Richard Tobin, 2005/08/20
- Re: lenses, Uncle Al, 2005/08/20
- Re: lenses, the softrat, 2005/08/20
NOMINATION: "Cinquirer" for Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, Jim Black, 2005/08/20
Re: The reason why SR is incomplete, tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
Re: Photonic crystals -- remarkably fertile area of physics research, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/20
Experimental verification of the Casimir attractive force (Lamoreaux), mountain man, 2005/08/20
- Re: Experimental verification of the Casimir attractive force (Lamoreaux), Mike, 2005/08/20
Re: Electron tunneling??, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/20
- Re: Electron tunneling??, Mark Martin, 2005/08/20
- Re: Electron tunneling??, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/20
  - Message not available
    - Re: Electron tunneling??, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/21
Re: Two mirrors facing each other, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/20
- Re: Two mirrors facing each other, tdp1001, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Two mirrors facing each other, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
    - Re: Two mirrors facing each other, tdp1001, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Two mirrors facing each other, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/22
Von Neumann and Heisenberg on the HUP, OsherD, 2005/08/20
- Re: Von Neumann and Heisenberg on the HUP, OsherD, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Von Neumann and Heisenberg on the HUP, OsherD, 2005/08/20
Dirac's aether, mountain man, 2005/08/20
- Re: Dirac's aether, Androcles, 2005/08/20
- Re: Dirac's aether, Uncle Al, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Dirac's aether, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, tj Frazir, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 2005/08/21
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, Nick, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, T Wake, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, Nick, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 2005/08/24
- Re: Dirac's aether, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/23
  - Re: Dirac's aether, tj Frazir, 2005/08/23
  - Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, mountain man, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, mountain man, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/24
The Mysterious Dark Energy, mountain man, 2005/08/20
- Re: The Mysterious Dark Energy, Androcles, 2005/08/20
  - Re: The Mysterious Dark Energy, mountain man, 2005/08/23
Fine Fabric: New, fast way to make sheets of nanotubes, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
Strangelets-Hadron Fusion question, Alfred, 2005/08/20
Re: Tokamak fusion, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/20
Help with science for novel., Sugapablo, 2005/08/20
- Re: Help with science for novel., Mike, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Help with science for novel., Androcles, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Help with science for novel., Uncle Al, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Help with science for novel., donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
- Re: Help with science for novel., CWatters, 2005/08/20
- Re: Help with science for novel., Uncle Al, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Help with science for novel., John Sefton, 2005/08/20
- Re: Help with science for novel., Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/20
- Re: Help with science for novel., pete, 2005/08/20
- Re: Help with science for novel., john_ramsden, 2005/08/20
- Re: Help with science for novel., jimp, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Help with science for novel., AJW, 2005/08/20
- Re: Help with science for novel., AJW, 2005/08/20
- Re: Help with science for novel., Ian Stirling, 2005/08/20
Re: Dave Eggers Killed Literature, Poetry, and Physics With Postmodern Anti-Theories Like String Theory, greatbooksclassics, 2005/08/20
Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, CSCP, 2005/08/20
- Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, CSCP, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Androcles, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Bob Cain, 2005/08/21
- Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Uncle Al, 2005/08/20
- Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Greysky, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Double-A, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Raving Loonie, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, CSCP, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, nightbat, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Pyriform, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, nightbat, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Pyriform, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Twittering One, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Pyriform, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Greysky, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Pyriform, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, nightbat, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/25
    - Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Raving Loonie, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, donstockbauer, 2005/08/21
- Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, blart, 2005/08/22
Time energy uncertainty, karan, 2005/08/20
- Re: Time energy uncertainty, James Copeland, 2005/08/20
- Re: Time energy uncertainty, Mike, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Time energy uncertainty, Mike, 2005/08/20
- Re: Time energy uncertainty, Uncle Al, 2005/08/20
- Re: Time energy uncertainty, the softrat, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Time energy uncertainty, ytyourclothes, 2005/08/21
- Re: Time energy uncertainty, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
want to buy science-fair accelerator, dances_with_barkadas, 2005/08/20
- Re: want to buy science-fair accelerator, CWatters, 2005/08/20
- Re: want to buy science-fair accelerator, Uncle Al, 2005/08/20
  - Re: want to buy science-fair accelerator, dances_with_barkadas, 2005/08/21
Uncle Al is a computer program, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 2005/08/20
- Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, dedanoe, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 2005/08/20
- Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Perspicacious, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 2005/08/20
- Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Traveler, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Bob Cain, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tj Frazir, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, donstockbauer, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/28
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/30
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/29
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, donstockbauer, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/30
    - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/21
    - Louis Savain "Traveler" use this improvement, hanson, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Louis Savain "Traveler" use this improvement, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Louis Savain "Traveler" use this improvement, Traveler, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Louis Savain "Traveler" use this improvement, TokaMundo, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Louis Savain "Traveler" use this improvement, hanson, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, PLaToPeS, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Traveler, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, PLaToPeS, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Traveler, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, PLaToPeS, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Traveler, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, PLaToPeS, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/24
  - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, john_ramsden, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Edward Green, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 2005/08/21
- Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Traveler, 2005/08/20
- Message not available
  - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 2005/08/25
- Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, boo, 2005/08/25
  - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 2005/08/27
    - Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/27
- Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Y.Porat, 2005/08/27
Mapping the domains of the sciences to its theories, mountain man, 2005/08/20
- Re: Mapping the domains of the sciences to its theories, mountain man, 2005/08/20
Re: Pee powered battery generates 1.5 volts, Michael, 2005/08/20
- Re: Pee powered battery generates 1.5 volts, Michael, 2005/08/20
- Re: Pee powered battery generates 1.5 volts, Dave, 2005/08/20
Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Arnold, 2005/08/20
- Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, the softrat, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Arnold, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Bob Cain, 2005/08/20
- Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Arnold, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Edward Green, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, the softrat, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Bob Cain, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, PD, 2005/08/22
- Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/20
- Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Nick, 2005/08/20
Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether, Laurent, 2005/08/19
- Re: Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether, Nick, 2005/08/19
- Re: Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether, Androcles, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether, macromitch, 2005/08/21
Re: Article: Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory, xxein, 2005/08/19
Re: pressurized airplane cabins, Androcles, 2005/08/19
- Re: pressurized airplane cabins, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/20
  - Re: pressurized airplane cabins, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
    - Re: pressurized airplane cabins, jimp, 2005/08/20
Re: Why matter slows light, Tom Roberts, 2005/08/19
"Ph.D.s in America on the decline", yared22311, 2005/08/19
- Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/19
  - Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Androcles, 2005/08/19
  - Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", TokaMundo, 2005/08/21
- Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Uncle Al, 2005/08/19
  - Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", tj Frazir, 2005/08/19
  - Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Zigoteau, 2005/08/20
    - Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
    - Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Uncle Al, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Zigoteau, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Uncle Al, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", donstockbauer, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Schoenfeld, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Uncle Al, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Zigoteau, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
    - Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", donstockbauer, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/21
- Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Jason Stanidge, 2005/08/19
  - Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Jason Stanidge, 2005/08/19
- Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Schoenfeld, 2005/08/20
- Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/20
  - Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Schoenfeld, 2005/08/20
New Information re Gravity, Charles, 2005/08/19
- Re: New Information re Gravity, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/19
  - Re: New Information re Gravity, tj Frazir, 2005/08/19
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Uncle Al, 2005/08/19
  - Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/23
    - Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington,DC, Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington,DC, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington,DC, Uncle Al, 2005/08/23
  - Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/23
Is light deflected by electric fields?, Thomas Smid, 2005/08/19
- Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
    - Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/21
- Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, macromitch, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, T Wake, 2005/08/19
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, T Wake, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/20
- Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Murat . H . Ozer, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Thomas Smid, 2005/08/20
- Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Thomas Smid, 2005/08/20
Re: hubble deep shot, John Sefton, 2005/08/19
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 742 August 19, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Schoenfeld, 2005/08/19
- Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 2005/08/20
  - Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
    - Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Sam Wormley, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Sam Wormley, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/22
Re: fastest way to stir sugar into coffee/tea?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/19
- Re: fastest way to stir sugar into coffee/tea?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/19
- Re: fastest way to stir sugar into coffee/tea?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/20
Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, simon, 2005/08/19
- Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, simon, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, Martin, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, jimp, 2005/08/20
- Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
  - Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
Re: OK, this is it, Richard, 2005/08/19
- Re: OK, this is it, Josef Matz, 2005/08/19
- Re: OK, this is it, Hatunen, 2005/08/19
  - Re: OK, this is it, Richard, 2005/08/20
    - Re: OK, this is it, Joseki, 2005/08/20
    - Re: OK, this is it, Hatunen, 2005/08/20
    - Re: OK, this is it, Laurent, 2005/08/20
Re: PERFECT EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT (P.E.L.E.), donstockbauer, 2005/08/19
Re: Dirac and the aether postulate, FrediFizzx, 2005/08/19
- Re: Dirac and the aether postulate, mountain man, 2005/08/23
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/19
- Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Androcles, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, RP, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Androcles, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, RP, 2005/08/22
- Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
    - Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Nick, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Nick, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 2005/08/28
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/28
      
      Message not available
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/30
Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/19
- Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
- Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?, Timo Nieminen, 2005/08/19
  - Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/22
    - Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?, Timo Nieminen, 2005/08/22
- Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?, dances_with_barkadas, 2005/08/20
Re: General Relativity, Androcles, 2005/08/19
- Re: General Relativity, Randy Poe, 2005/08/19
  - Re: General Relativity, Androcles, 2005/08/19
    - Re: General Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: General Relativity, Randy Poe, 2005/08/19
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
Re: Space time ??, PD, 2005/08/19
- Re: Space time ??, tj Frazir, 2005/08/19
- Re: Space time ??, tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
- Re: Space time ??, Traveler, 2005/08/20
- Re: Space time ??, markwh04, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Space time ??, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Space time ??, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/21
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
- Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 2005/08/19
  - Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
    - Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, TokaMundo, 2005/08/22
    - TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, OM, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, donstockbauer, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, T Wake, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, Brad Guth, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, OM, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, TokaMundo, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, OM, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, William Hughes, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, TokaMundo, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, OM, 2005/08/23
    - Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, TokaMundo, 2005/08/22
    - Message not available
      
      Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, OM, 2005/08/23
- Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 2005/08/21
- Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 2005/08/21
  - Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
  - Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
- Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 2005/08/22
  - Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, TokaMundo, 2005/08/22
    - Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 2005/08/23
- Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 2005/08/24
Re: Entropy question, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/19
- Re: Entropy question, Craig Franck, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Entropy question, donstockbauer, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Entropy question, T Wake, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Entropy question, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Entropy question, Craig Franck, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Entropy question, Edward Green, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Entropy question, Edward Green, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Entropy question, Craig Franck, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Entropy question, Craig Franck, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: Entropy question, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Entropy question, mmeron, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Entropy question, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/20
- Re: Entropy question, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Entropy question, Edward Green, 2005/08/19
- Re: Entropy question, Edward Green, 2005/08/19
- Re: Entropy question, carlip-nospam, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Entropy question, Craig Franck, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Entropy question, Edward Green, 2005/08/23
Symmetric language, Edward Green, 2005/08/19
- Re: Symmetric language, Uncle Al, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Symmetric language, Edward Green, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Symmetric language, Uncle Al, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Symmetric language, Edward Green, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Symmetric language, Math Freak, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Symmetric language, Math Freak, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Symmetric language, Edward Green, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Symmetric language, Androcles, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Symmetric language, Math Freak, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Symmetric language, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Symmetric language, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/20
- Re: Symmetric language, michaeld, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Symmetric language, Edward Green, 2005/08/20
Re: Spiral Star Shaped Cone Hole in rock. what could it be?, John Popelish, 2005/08/19
The technologist has created an electro-magnetically propelled..., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
- Re: The technologist has created an electro-magnetically propelled..., CWatters, 2005/08/19
  - Re: The technologist has created an electro-magnetically propelled..., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W, Mike, 2005/08/19
- Re: sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/19
  - Re: sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
  - Re: sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W, Mike, 2005/08/19
- Re: sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W, vanep, 2005/08/19
Re: GR is a Tower of Babel, tdp1001, 2005/08/19
- Re: GR is a Tower of Babel, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
- Re: GR is a Tower of Babel, Uncle Al, 2005/08/19
  - Message not available
    - Re: GR is a Tower of Babel, Androcles, 2005/08/20
- Re: GR is a Tower of Babel, hanson, 2005/08/19
  - Re: GR is a Tower of Babel, Androcles, 2005/08/19
"The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", Meti, 2005/08/19
- Re: "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", donstockbauer, 2005/08/19
Temprature on Moon Surface, George, 2005/08/19
- Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, donstockbauer, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, George, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, T Wake, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Brad Guth, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, T Wake, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, TokaMundo, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Brad Guth, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 2005/08/22
- Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Nick, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
- Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Brad Guth, 2005/08/22
  - Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, T Wake, 2005/08/22
    - Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Brad Guth, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, T Wake, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Brad Guth, 2005/08/22
- Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, George, 2005/08/23
- Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, T Wake, 2005/08/21
  - Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Brad Guth, 2005/08/21
    - Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/21
- Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 2005/08/21
Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/19
- Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/21
- Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
PLANETARY ORBITS BY THERMODYNAMICS, ACE, 2005/08/19
- Re: PLANETARY ORBITS BY THERMODYNAMICS, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction, Mike, 2005/08/19
- Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction, macromitch, 2005/08/19
- Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction, Dr Photon, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction, Dr Photon, 2005/08/19
- Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction, Mike, 2005/08/19
Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, unamerican, 2005/08/19
- Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, donstockbauer, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/22
  - Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, footballdvds, 2005/08/19
- Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/19
- Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, Y.Porat, 2005/08/19
- Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, David, 2005/08/19
  - Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, Y.Porat, 2005/08/19
- Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/20
- Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, PD, 2005/08/19
  - Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, David, 2005/08/19
- Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, Michael Moroney, 2005/08/19
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/19
- Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, Androcles, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
- Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
- Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
Re: Two points of view, Don1, 2005/08/19
- Re: Two points of view, Don1, 2005/08/19
- Re: Two points of view, tadchem, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Two points of view, Don1, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Two points of view, PD, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Two points of view, tadchem, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Two² points of view Poor ignorant masses, tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
- Re: Two points of view, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/20
- Re: Two points of view, tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/19
- Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?, Androcles, 2005/08/19
Article: Pee-powered battery smaller than a credit card, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/19
Article: Dwarf galaxy lights up dark matter debate, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/19
- Re: Article: Dwarf galaxy lights up dark matter debate, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/19
- Re: Article: Dwarf galaxy lights up dark matter debate, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/22
Re: What is a photon?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/19
- Re: What is a photon?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/20
  - Re: What is a photon?, Androcles, 2005/08/20
    - Re: What is a photon?, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: What is a photon?, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/19
- Re: Three phases of acceleration, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/20
  - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/20
    - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/22
    - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, tadchem, 2005/08/22
- Re: Three phases of acceleration, oconnell, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 2005/08/19
- Re: Three phases of acceleration, PD, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, briggs, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, PD, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Don1, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Don1, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Androcles, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, PD, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Don1, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Timothy Little, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 2005/08/19
- Re: Three phases of acceleration, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Mike, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, Randy Poe, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Three phases of acceleration, PD, 2005/08/19
- Re: Three phases of acceleration, Paul Cardinale, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 2005/08/19
- Re: Three phases of acceleration, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Three phases of acceleration, schoenfeld1, 2005/08/19
    - Re: Three phases of acceleration, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Three phases of acceleration, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/20
Re: Theory of acceleration, GeekBoy, 2005/08/19
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 741 August 12, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/12
"The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Tahc, 2005/08/12
- Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/12
Terrorists, they brought my cats to the streets of this country, fbonsignore, 2005/08/12
Re: Big Bertha Thing blogs, Tony Lance, 2005/08/12
energy, zomoco1, 2005/08/12
- Re: energy, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/12
- Re: energy, John Sefton, 2005/08/12
some representation theory questions, m1ngleg02, 2005/08/12
- Re: some representation theory questions, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/19
  - Re: some representation theory questions, m1ngleg02, 2005/08/22
    - Re: some representation theory questions, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/22
- Re: some representation theory questions, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/22
  - Re: some representation theory questions, m1ngleg02, 2005/08/22
  - Re: some representation theory questions, m1ngleg02, 2005/08/23
Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations 3, OsherD, 2005/08/12
Schroedinger's Darn Cat, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 2005/08/12
Book: Matters of Gravity, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/12
Re: Just a big question..., the softrat, 2005/08/12
- Re: Just a big question..., Charles, 2005/08/12
basic question classical v. relativity, zxcv_890, 2005/08/12
- Re: basic question classical v. relativity, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/12
  - Re: basic question classical v. relativity, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/12
- Re: basic question classical v. relativity, mmeron, 2005/08/12
  - Re: basic question classical v. relativity, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/12
    - Re: basic question classical v. relativity, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: basic question classical v. relativity, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/12
- Re: basic question classical v. relativity, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/12
- Re: basic question classical v. relativity, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/12
The ups and downs of doping, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/11
CONGRESS OKs $17.3M to Honor Smithsonian Scientist --, Ed Conrad, 2005/08/11
Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/11
- Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
- Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?, Edward Green, 2005/08/11
- Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?, night soil dalits, 2005/08/11
- Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/12
The Subatomic and Primordial Energies, Dale Evans, 2005/08/11
- Re: The Subatomic and Primordial Energies, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
- Re: The Subatomic and Primordial Energies, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/11
- Re: The Subatomic and Primordial Energies, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/11
Re: (No Subject), Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
Innovation for the Lazy Resident (no helpful responses), mwmiller314, 2005/08/11
Weight = mass x g, Don1, 2005/08/11
- Re: Weight = mass x g, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Weight = mass x g, Don1, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Weight = mass x g, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
- Re: Weight = mass x g, 888, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Weight = mass x g, Don1, 2005/08/11
- Re: Weight = mass x g, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/11
- Re: Weight = mass x g, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/11
- Re: Weight = mass x g, snapdragon31, 2005/08/12
  - Re: Weight = mass x g, CWatters, 2005/08/12
  - Re: Weight = mass x g, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/12
    - Re: Weight = mass x g, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Weight = mass x g, Don1, 2005/08/12
- Re: Weight = mass x g, Clemens W, 2005/08/12
  - Re: Weight = mass x g, LeoK, 2005/08/12
    - Re: Weight = mass x g, Clemens W, 2005/08/12
Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, sdr, 2005/08/11
- Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, TomGee, 2005/08/11
- Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, PD, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Edgar Svendsen, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Ken Muldrew, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, PD, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Ken Muldrew, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, PD, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, TomGee, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, PD, 2005/08/12
    - Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, jmfbahciv, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Ken Muldrew, 2005/08/12
- Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Nosterill, 2005/08/12
- Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Christopher Kerr, 2005/08/12
- Message not available
  - Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, John Smith, 2005/08/23
    - Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, J. B. Wood, 2005/08/26
HUBBLE PHOTOS Shaking Up ALL of Science, edconrad, 2005/08/11
- Re: HUBBLE PHOTOS Shaking Up ALL of Science, T Wake, 2005/08/11
- Re: HUBBLE PHOTOS Shaking Up ALL of Science, CWatters, 2005/08/11
fMRI in the comfort of your own home, Dr Photon, 2005/08/11
- Re: fMRI in the comfort of your own home, Dr Photon, 2005/08/11
Re: Who gains from CORPERATE STATES OF AMERICA, tj Frazir, 2005/08/11
vortex, myth, 2005/08/11
- Re: vortex, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/11
- Re: vortex, Zigoteau, 2005/08/11
  - Re: vortex, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/11
    - Re: vortex, Zigoteau, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: vortex, S. Enterprize Company, 2005/08/12
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Egral, 2005/08/11
- Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/11
- Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
- "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Egral, 2005/08/11
negative information, Mike Maxwell, 2005/08/11
- Re: negative information, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/11
Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations 2, OsherD, 2005/08/11
Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, RolandRB, 2005/08/11
- Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/11
- Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Dr Photon, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Dr Photon, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Dr Photon, 2005/08/11
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/20
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, TokaMundo, 2005/08/19
  - Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Eugene Stefanovich, 2005/08/19
- Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, SSJVCmag, 2005/08/11
- Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/11
- Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Richard Henry, 2005/08/11
How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, Gbeat24, 2005/08/11
- Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/11
- Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, PD, 2005/08/11
  - Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, Androcles, 2005/08/11
  - Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, Gbeat24, 2005/08/12
    - Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/12
    - Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, PD, 2005/08/12
Bhabha Scattering significance, parti, 2005/08/11
- Re: Bhabha Scattering significance, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Bhabha Scattering significance, PD, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Bhabha Scattering significance, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Bhabha Scattering significance, Androcles, 2005/08/11
Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations, OsherD, 2005/08/11
- Re: Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations, OsherD, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations, OsherD, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations, OsherD, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations, OsherD, 2005/08/11
Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 2005/08/11
- Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
- Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
(SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 2005/08/11
- Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
- (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 2005/08/26
  - Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 2005/08/11
- Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
- Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 2005/08/11
- Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
- Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 2005/08/26
  - Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Uncle Al, 2005/08/26
Our little sci.chem and sci.chem.analytical butt buddy Joel Evan Polowin....., Joel Polowin, 2005/08/10
Is there any harmless radiation ?, Externet, 2005/08/10
- Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, RP, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Externet, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, PD, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Externet, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Richard Henry, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Externet, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Richard Henry, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, PD, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Externet, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, PD, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Externet, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, PD, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Richard Henry, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, p6, 2005/08/12
  - Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, night soil dalits, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, mmeron, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 2005/08/11
- Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Richard Henry, 2005/08/11
- Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Helmut Wabnig, 2005/08/11
- Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, the softrat, 2005/08/11
- Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, mmeron, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, mmeron, 2005/08/12
- Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
- Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, tj Frazir, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, T Wake, 2005/08/11
- Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
- Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, mark_tarka, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, tj Frazir, 2005/08/11
NASA brings back the Trash, night soil dalits, 2005/08/10
- Re: NASA brings back the Trash, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
- Re: NASA brings back the Trash, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS, ACE, 2005/08/10
- Re: PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Nick, 2005/08/10
- Re: GR perplexity for a layman, ACE, 2005/08/10
  - Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
- Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
- Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Jim Black, 2005/08/11
- Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/11
- Re: GR perplexity for a layman, the softrat, 2005/08/11
- Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Paul Cardinale, 2005/08/11
- Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Don1, 2005/08/10
- Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Bob Cain, 2005/08/11
- Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Steve Ralph, 2005/08/11
- Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Larry Lard, 2005/08/11
- Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, PD, 2005/08/11
  - Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Androcles, 2005/08/11
- Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Randy Poe, 2005/08/11
- Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Uncle Al, 2005/08/11
- Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Mark lman, 2005/08/11
- Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, J, 2005/08/11
  - Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Don1, 2005/08/12
- Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Y.Porat, 2005/08/12
- Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Nick, 2005/08/12
  - Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Don1, 2005/08/12
gravity and black holes, conradeaton, 2005/08/10
- Re: gravity and black holes, Uncle Al, 2005/08/10
  - Re: gravity and black holes, Nick, 2005/08/10
    - Re: gravity and black holes, T Wake, 2005/08/11
- Re: gravity and black holes, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, the softrat, 2005/08/10
- Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, the softrat, 2005/08/11
- Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/11
- Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/11
  - Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, the softrat, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/12
Re: Solved equation resource, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/10
Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/10
- Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/11
Shadow Matter (E8xE8 gauge symmetry group), p6, 2005/08/10
- Re: Shadow Matter (E8xE8 gauge symmetry group), Dr Photon, 2005/08/11
Re: epicenter at a federal level, David DeLaney, 2005/08/10
Re: WHY GREAT MINDS CAN'T GRASP CONSCIOUSNESS, T Wake, 2005/08/10
Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Don1, 2005/08/10
- Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, briggs, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Mr Pixie, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, tadchem, 2005/08/10
    - Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/10
- Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Uncle Al, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Richard Henry, 2005/08/10
    - Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Uncle Al, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Greg Neill, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location..., tj Frazir, 2005/08/12
- Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, C. Bond, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location..., tj Frazir, 2005/08/12
Re: Hi twake!!!, tj Frazir, 2005/08/10
- Re: Hi twake!!!, T Wake, 2005/08/10
Re: wisdom, c and r, Uncle Al, 2005/08/10
- Re: wisdom, c and r, T Wake, 2005/08/10
Re: aether must be kept here, Uncle Al, 2005/08/10
"The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Ypoc, 2005/08/10
- Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
- Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Uncle Al, 2005/08/10
Herc's copyright infinite energy machine, |-|erc, 2005/08/10
- Re: Herc's copyright infinite energy machine, CWatters, 2005/08/10
- Re: Herc's copyright infinite energy machine, Zigoteau, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Herc's copyright infinite energy machine, |-|erc, 2005/08/10
Re: phase consistency of photons in a stream, p . kinsler, 2005/08/10
Re: Black body radiation, Zigoteau, 2005/08/10
- Re: Black body radiation, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
- Re: Black body radiation, Uncle Al, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Black body radiation, mike3, 2005/08/10
    - Re: Black body radiation, Zigoteau, 2005/08/11
Re: Innovation for the Lazy Resident, mwmiller314, 2005/08/10
Tucker basic cosmology, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/10
- Re: Tucker basic cosmology, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
- Re: Tucker basic cosmology, feuerbac, 2005/08/10
- Re: Tucker basic cosmology, Uncle Al, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Tucker basic cosmology, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/10
Index To Dimensions 2: Additional Dimensional Subtypes, OsherD, 2005/08/10
- Re: Index To Dimensions 2: Additional Dimensional Subtypes, Nick, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Index To Dimensions 2: Additional Dimensional Subtypes, OsherD, 2005/08/10
- Re: Index To Dimensions 2: Additional Dimensional Subtypes, OsherD, 2005/08/10
Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 2005/08/10
- Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, George, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 2005/08/10
    - Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 2005/08/10
    - Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, George, 2005/08/11
- Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 2005/08/10
    - Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 2005/08/10
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, macromitch, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 2005/08/19
      
      Message not available
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, John Sefton, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Jim Black, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, John Sefton, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Jim Black, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, donstockbauer, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Androcles, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 2005/08/29
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 2005/08/30
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Jim Black, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Jim Black, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, tj Frazir, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, jimp, 2005/08/22
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Jim Black, 2005/08/20
- Message not available
  - Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 2005/08/10
    - Message not available
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The morons do stack, tj Frazir, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The morons do stack, T Wake, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 2005/08/12
    - Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 2005/08/11
Take the rate out of the EP * Nth Complexity, Nick, 2005/08/09
- Re: Take the rate out of the EP * Nth Complexity, T Wake, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Take the rate out of the EP * Nth Complexity, Nick, 2005/08/10
    - Re: Take the rate out of the EP * Nth Complexity, T Wake, 2005/08/10
Someday It Will All Be Clear, Charles, 2005/08/09
impenetrability, Don1, 2005/08/09
- Re: impenetrability, Clemens W, 2005/08/09
- Re: impenetrability, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/09
  - Re: impenetrability, the softrat, 2005/08/09
    - Re: impenetrability, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/09
  - Re: impenetrability, Proginoskes, 2005/08/10
    - Re: impenetrability, Dr Photon, 2005/08/10
  - Re: impenetrability, Don1, 2005/08/10
    - Re: impenetrability, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: impenetrability, Mike, 2005/08/10
- Re: impenetrability, Uncle Al, 2005/08/09
  - Re: impenetrability, tadchem, 2005/08/10
    - Re: impenetrability, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
  - Re: impenetrability, Don1, 2005/08/10
    - Re: impenetrability, Smolley, 2005/08/10
    - Re: impenetrability, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: impenetrability, Don1, 2005/08/10
    - Re: impenetrability, Uncle Al, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: impenetrability, Don1, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: impenetrability, Uncle Al, 2005/08/10
- Re: impenetrability, Proginoskes, 2005/08/10
  - Re: impenetrability, Don1, 2005/08/10
  - Re: impenetrability, Don1, 2005/08/10
- Re: impenetrability, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/10
  - Re: impenetrability, Dr Photon, 2005/08/10
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Re: impenetrability, hanson, 2005/08/19
Fundamentals, Don1, 2005/08/09
- Re: Fundamentals, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Fundamentals, Don1, 2005/08/10
    - Re: Fundamentals, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
- Re: Fundamentals, Herman Trivilino, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Fundamentals, Don1, 2005/08/10
- Re: Fundamentals, Uncle Al, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Fundamentals, Don1, 2005/08/10
    - Re: Fundamentals, Uncle Al, 2005/08/10
- Re: Fundamentals, Earle Jones, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Fundamentals, Don1, 2005/08/10
Popular Handbook Microscope 1905 FA, JaneyP, 2005/08/09
- Re: Popular Handbook Microscope 1905 FA, night soil dalits, 2005/08/09
Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/09
- Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/10
  - Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/10
    - Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/12
- Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Nick, 2005/08/10
- Message not available
  - Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/10
- Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/10
Time Not Relative, ?, 2005/08/09
- Re: Time Not Relative, Uncle Al, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Time Not Relative, John Sefton, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Time Not Relative, Paul Cardinale, 2005/08/10
- Re: Time Not Relative, Strange Indeed, 2005/08/09
- Re: Time Not Relative, Nick, 2005/08/10
Q: Groups and crystal properties, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/09
- Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, PD, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, AES, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Androcles, 2005/08/11
- Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Uncle Al, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Zigoteau, 2005/08/10
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Billy Bob, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Bob Cain, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Gary Sokolich, 2005/08/20
      
      Message not available
      Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Gary Sokolich, 2005/08/22
- Re: Groups and crystal properties, night soil dalits, 2005/08/09
bubble- fusion, heiack, 2005/08/09
- Re: bubble- fusion, Uncle Al, 2005/08/09
A Realistic Hypothesis by Elmo Mottard, elmom15@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/08/09
- Re: A Realistic Hypothesis by Elmo Mottard, Uncle Al, 2005/08/09
Fosbury a Flop ???, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/09
"The Nature of Mass", Htlaeh, 2005/08/09
- Re: "The Nature of Mass", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/09
Kramers Kroning Relations and Causality, Tanja Wendt, 2005/08/09
- Re: Kramers Kroning Relations and Causality, Richard Herring, 2005/08/09
USA in the 2010s, Math Freak, 2005/08/09
Toothpick Bridge Interest?, Toothpick Bridge Master, 2005/08/09
- Re: Toothpick Bridge Interest?, Androcles, 2005/08/09
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM fi..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/09
- Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM fi..., gilheron, 2005/08/09
  - Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM fi..., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/09
Triple Codes 5: 6-Dimensional Gauged Supergravity, OsherD, 2005/08/09
- Re: Triple Codes 5: 6-Dimensional Gauged Supergravity, OsherD, 2005/08/09
Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Theo J, 2005/08/08
- Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/08
- Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Ron Verrall, 2005/08/08
  - Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem (Oops), Ron Verrall, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, mmeron, 2005/08/09
    - Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Ron Verrall, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, mmeron, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Theo J, 2005/08/09
    - Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Ron Verrall, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Theo J, 2005/08/10
- Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, John C . Polasek, 2005/08/09
Dirac Medal goes to condensed matter physicists, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/08
PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMO, ACE, 2005/08/08
- Re: PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMO, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/08
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 8 August 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/08
virtual particle interactions, Dr Photon, 2005/08/08
- Re: virtual particle interactions, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/08
  - Re: virtual particle interactions, Dr Photon, 2005/08/09
    - Re: virtual particle interactions, Y.Porat, 2005/08/09
    - Re: virtual particle interactions, Dr Photon, 2005/08/09
- Re: virtual particle interactions, PD, 2005/08/08
  - Re: virtual particle interactions, Dr Photon, 2005/08/09
    - Re: virtual particle interactions, PD, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, Y.Porat, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/10
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, Y.Porat, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, PD, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, Nick, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, PD, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, Androcles, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, PD, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, Androcles, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, Y.Porat, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/11
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, Y.Porat, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/11
      
      Re: virtual particle interactions, Y.Porat, 2005/08/12
  - Re: virtual particle interactions, Androcles, 2005/08/11
attractive force via particle exchange - how?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/08/08
- Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/08
  - Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Ken Oath, 2005/08/08
  - Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/09
- Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/08
  - Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/09
    - Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/10
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/27
      
      Message not available
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/27
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/26
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/26
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/27
  - Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Androcles, 2005/08/11
- Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, ytyourclothes, 2005/08/09
  - Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Ken Oath, 2005/08/09
  - Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/08/09
    - Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, dedanoe, 2005/08/09
    - Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/10
- Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/10
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Mitchell Jones, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Mitchell Jones, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Mitchell Jones, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Mitchell Jones, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/24
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Mitchell Jones, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/25
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Mitchell Jones, 2005/08/27
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/23
- Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, franklinhu, 2005/08/10
  - Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/10
    - Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Androcles, 2005/08/11
    - Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, franklinhu, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, franklinhu, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: attractive slope exchange - how?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/12
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/19
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/21
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/22
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 2005/08/20
Time is running out for Henry Haapalainen - Where is the meat?, Mike, 2005/08/08
the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, a_plutonium, 2005/08/08
- Re: the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, Timothy, 2005/08/09
- Re: the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, a_plutonium, 2005/08/09
  - Worlds Top Scientists Ponder.., shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/08/09
  - why converges to what Re: the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, a_plutonium, 2005/08/10
    - logic/math test that tells whether Big Bang is true or a fake Re: the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, a_plutonium, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: logic/math test that tells whether Big Bang is true or a fake, john_ramsden, 2005/08/11
      
      Equation of Everything (they said it would be elegant and obvious, and that it is) Re: logic/math test that tells whether Big Bang is true or a fake, a_plutonium, 2005/08/12
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, a_plutonium, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, a_plutonium, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, Minus XVII, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, a_plutonium, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, Minus XVII, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, a_plutonium, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, Minus XVII, 2005/08/23
      
      Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, a_plutonium, 2005/08/26
- Re: the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, Timothy, 2005/08/09
  - Re: the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, Orion, 2005/08/09
Re: The Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 3, Uncle Al, 2005/08/08
Gravitational naughtiness, Uncle Al, 2005/08/08
- Re: Gravitational naughtiness, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/08
- Re: Gravitational naughtiness, Llanzlan Klazmon, 2005/08/08
  - Re: Gravitational naughtiness, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/09
- Re: Gravitational naughtiness, Mike, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Gravitational naughtiness, tj Frazir, 2005/08/09
    - Re: Gravitational naughtiness, T Wake, 2005/08/09
- Re: Gravitational naughtiness, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/09
Gibbs Paradox, Tanja Wendt, 2005/08/08
- Re: Gibbs Paradox, Matthew Lybanon, 2005/08/08
- Re: Gibbs Paradox, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/08
  - Re: Gibbs Paradox, Edward Green, 2005/08/09
    - Re: Gibbs Paradox, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Gibbs Paradox, Edward Green, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Gibbs Paradox, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Gibbs Paradox, Ken Muldrew, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Gibbs Paradox, Edward Green, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Gibbs Paradox, Ken Muldrew, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Gibbs Paradox, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Gibbs Paradox, Ken Muldrew, 2005/08/12
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Gibbs Rant-a-dox, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/19
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Gibbs Rant-a-dox, Edward Green, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Gibbs Rant-a-dox, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/22
doom, kstocklmeir, 2005/08/08
- Re: doom, Richard Tobin, 2005/08/08
- Re: doom, PD, 2005/08/08
  - Re: doom, Androcles, 2005/08/11
- Re: doom, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/10
- doom, kstocklmeir, 2005/08/08
- doom, kstocklmeir, 2005/08/09
  - Re: doom, T Wake, 2005/08/09
  - Re: doom, Uncle Al, 2005/08/09
- doom, kstocklmeir, 2005/08/10
- doom, kstocklmeir, 2005/08/19
- doom, kstocklmeir, 2005/08/19
- doom, kstocklmeir, 2005/08/19
- doom, kstocklmeir, 2005/08/19
"Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Htlaeh, 2005/08/08
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Schoenfeld, 2005/08/08
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/08
  - Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/09
    - Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/09
- Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Uncle Al, 2005/08/08
Link between single particle states and full wavefunction?, Anton81, 2005/08/08
- Re: Link between single particle states and full wavefunction?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/09
Index To Dimensions, OsherD, 2005/08/08
- Re: Index To Dimensions, OsherD, 2005/08/08
Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Dr Photon, 2005/08/08
- Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Ian Parker, 2005/08/08
  - Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Dr Photon, 2005/08/08
    - Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Ian Parker, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Dr Photon, 2005/08/08
- Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Bilge, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Dr Photon, 2005/08/09
    - Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Dr Photon, 2005/08/09
Re: Plane Crash in Sicily, Richard Herring, 2005/08/08
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, August 08, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 2005/08/08
Heisenberg Uncertainty Anomalies, OsherD, 2005/08/08
- Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Anomalies, OsherD, 2005/08/08
  - Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Anomalies, OsherD, 2005/08/08
New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/08
- Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, Pyriform, 2005/08/08
  - Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/08
    - Humorous alternative to ID!, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/08
- Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, Uncle Al, 2005/08/08
  - Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/08
    - Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, Uncle Al, 2005/08/08
  - Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, T Wake, 2005/08/08
- Biological Convergence, Not Intelligent Design (was: New Ideas for Intelligent Design!), markwh04, 2005/08/08
- Biological Convergence, Not Intelligent Design (was: New Ideas for Intelligent Design!), markwh04, 2005/08/08
  - Re: Biological Convergence, Not Intelligent Design (was: New Ideas for Intelligent Design!), Autymn D. C., 2005/08/10
  - Re: Biological Convergence, Not Intelligent Design (was: New Ideas for Intelligent Design!), Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/10
Re: this term: billion times more neutrinos than white matter Re: Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/08
- Re: this term: billion times more neutrinos than white matter Re: Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Paul Schlyter, 2005/08/08
  - Re: this term: billion times more neutrinos than white matter Re: Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/08
    - Re: this term: billion times more neutrinos than white matter Re: Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Paul Schlyter, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: this term: billion times more neutrinos than white matter Re: Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/11
Re: Gravity and electricity, the softrat, 2005/08/08
Re: altering science writing to fit Internet and not journals; Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, James "Kibo" Parry, 2005/08/08
- Re: altering science writing to fit Internet and not journals; Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Edward Cherlin, 2005/08/08
  - sloppy writing of Georg G. Raffelt Re: altering science writing to fit Internet and not journals; Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, a_plutonium, 2005/08/08
    - Re: sloppy writing of Georg G. Raffelt Re: altering science writing to fit Internet and not journals; Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Quantum Mirror, 2005/08/08
  - Re: altering science writing to fit Internet and not journals; Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Mark South, 2005/08/08
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 2, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/07
- Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 2, Uncle Al, 2005/08/07
- Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 2, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/07
  - Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 2, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/07
A Philosophical Physicist's Statement, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/07
Multiplicative (Two Variable) Noise Yields 2-Phases (Cancer vs Immune), OsherD, 2005/08/07
- Re: Multiplicative (Two Variable) Noise Yields 2-Phases (Cancer vs Immune), OsherD, 2005/08/07
mimical force, Don1, 2005/08/07
- Re: mimical force, Steve Ralph, 2005/08/07
  - Re: mimical force, Don1, 2005/08/07
    - Re: mimical force, Steve Ralph, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: mimical force, T Wake, 2005/08/07
- Re: mimical force, T Wake, 2005/08/07
  - Re: mimical force, Don1, 2005/08/07
    - Re: mimical force, Aydin, 2005/08/07
    - Re: mimical force, T Wake, 2005/08/07
    - Re: mimical force, Clemens W, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: mimical force, Don1, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: mimical force, Clemens W, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: mimical force for morons, tj Frazir, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: mimical force for morons, T Wake, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: mimical force for morons, tj Frazir, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: mimical force for morons, T Wake, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: mimical force for morons, tj Frazir, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: mimical force for morons, T Wake, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: mimical force for morons, tj Frazir, 2005/08/09
- Re: mimical force, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/07
  - Re: mimical force, macromitch, 2005/08/07
    - Re: mimical force, T Wake, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: mimical force, macromitch, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: mimical force, tadchem, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: mimical force, Steve Ralph, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: mimical force, T Wake, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: mimical force, Steve Ralph, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: mimical force, Don1, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: mimical force, Steve Ralph, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: mimical force, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: mimical force, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: mimical force, T Wake, 2005/08/11
- Re: mimical force, PD, 2005/08/08
  - Re: mimical force, Androcles, 2005/08/11
Dimensions of Mass, Time, Force, and Their Perception 2: E = wLF Re-Perceived, OsherD, 2005/08/07
- Re: Dimensions of Mass, Time, Force, and Their Perception 2: E = wLF Re-Perceived, OsherD, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Dimensions of Mass, Time, Force, and Their Perception 2: E = wLF Re-Perceived, Scismgenie, 2005/08/08
    - Re: Dimensions of Mass, Time, Force, and Their Perception 2: E = wLF Re-Perceived, OsherD, 2005/08/08
"Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Einsteinhoax, 2005/08/07
- Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/07
- Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Uncle Al, 2005/08/07
Re: GOD=G_uv LIFE AFTER DEATH, J. Horta, 2005/08/07
- Re: GOD=G_uv LIFE AFTER DEATH, T Wake, 2005/08/07
No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, Ed Conrad, 2005/08/07
- Re: No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, john_ramsden, 2005/08/07
  - Re: No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, TomGee, 2005/08/07
    - Re: No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, John Sefton, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, Mike, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, TomGee, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, Mike, 2005/08/07
Dimensions of Mass, Time, Force, and Their Perception, OsherD, 2005/08/07
- Re: Dimensions of Mass, Time, Force, and Their Perception, OsherD, 2005/08/07
What is expanding with the universe?, MosS, 2005/08/07
- Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Bill Hobba, 2005/08/07
- Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, kenseto, 2005/08/07
    - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, macromitch, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, macromitch, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, macromitch, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, kenseto, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, macromitch, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: What is slowing orbits with the universe time?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/09
    - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Tom Roberts, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, tj Frazir, 2005/08/09
    - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 2005/08/09
- Re: What is expanding with the universe?, TomGee, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, john_ramsden, 2005/08/07
    - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, TomGee, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Tom Roberts, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, TomGee, 2005/08/08
- Re: What is expanding with the universe?, john_ramsden, 2005/08/07
- Re: What is expanding with the universe?, nightbat, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Art Deco, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/09
- Re: What is expanding with the universe?, MosS, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, TomGee, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Tom Roberts, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/07
- Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Jim Black, 2005/08/07
- Re: What is expanding with the universe?, MosS, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 2005/08/07
    - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, MosS, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Jim Black, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Tom Roberts, 2005/08/07
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Jim Black, 2005/08/07
- Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2005/08/08
- Entropy is the fifth spatial dimension but only observable at cosmic scales., Jeff_Relf, 2005/08/09
  - Re: Entropy is the fifth spatial dimension but only observable at cosmic scales., bz, 2005/08/09
    - The difference between a nova and a type Ia supernova., Jeff_Relf, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: The difference between a nova and a type Ia supernova., bz, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: The difference between a nova and a type Ia supernova., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/09
      
      Irregardless of any accretion, a supernova is a collapsing star., Jeff_Relf, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Irregardless of any accretion, a supernova is a collapsing star., bz, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Irregardless of any accretion, a supernova is a collapsing star., Autymn D. C., 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Irregardless of any accretion, a supernova is a collapsing star., PD, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Irregardless of any accretion, a supernova is a collapsing star., N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2005/08/10
      
      I like double negatives., Jeff_Relf, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: I like double negatives., Autymn D. C., 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Irregardless of any accretion, a supernova is a collapsing star., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
      
      NASA's SNAP probe to find 6 thousand supernovae., Jeff_Relf, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: NASA's SNAP probe to find 6 thousand supernovae., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
- Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/09
- Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/09
  - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, John C . Polasek, 2005/08/09
    - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, TomGee, 2005/08/09
    - Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Jim Black, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: What is expanding with the universe?, John C . Polasek, 2005/08/10
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, tj Frazir, 2005/08/07
- Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, T Wake, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, tj Frazir, 2005/08/07
    - Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, T Wake, 2005/08/07
    - Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, T Wake, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, darthpup, 2005/08/09
- Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, T Wake, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, tj Frazir, 2005/08/07
    - Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, T Wake, 2005/08/07
Velocity of Electrons, skeptic, 2005/08/06
- Re: Velocity of Electrons, Aydin, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Velocity of Electrons, skeptic, 2005/08/07
    - Re: Velocity of Electrons, Zigoteau, 2005/08/08
    - Re: Velocity of Electrons, Aydin, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Velocity of Electrons, AJW, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Velocity of Electrons, Aydin, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Velocity of Electrons, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/10
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, deowll, 2005/08/06
- Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, a_plutonium, 2005/08/07
  - Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Edward Green, 2005/08/09
    - Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Everett M. Greene, 2005/08/09
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Everett M. Greene, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Edward Green, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Everett M. Greene, 2005/08/11
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, deowll, 2005/08/12
    - Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Matthew Lybanon, 2005/08/09
    - Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, a_plutonium, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Christian Winter, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, deowll, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Matthew Lybanon, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, deowll, 2005/08/12
  - Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, deowll, 2005/08/12
- Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, James Toupin, 2005/08/07
Standard force, Don1, 2005/08/06
- Re: Standard force, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/06
  - Re: Standard force, Don1, 2005/08/07
    - Re: Standard force, T Wake, 2005/08/07
    - Re: Standard force, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: Standard force, Don1, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: Standard force, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/07
    - Re: Standard force, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Standard force, Y.Porat, 2005/08/08
- Re: Standard force, Nutbuster, 2005/08/06
  - Re: Standard force, Aydin, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Standard force, Don1, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Standard force, Don1, 2005/08/07
- Re: Standard force, Aydin, 2005/08/06
- Re: Standard force, tj Frazir, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Standard force, T Wake, 2005/08/07
- Re: Standard force, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/08
Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Nutbuster, 2005/08/06
- Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Scismgenie, 2005/08/07
    - Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/08
    - Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 2005/08/08
- Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, night dalits, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/07
    - Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, john_ramsden, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Uncle Al, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/07
    - Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Steven Gray, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/07
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/08
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Steven Gray, 2005/08/08
      
      Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/09
      
      Message not available
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 2005/08/11
      
      Message not available
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Timo Nieminen, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Timo Nieminen, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/12
      
      Message not available
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/19
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, donstockbauer, 2005/08/20
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/21
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/22
      
      Message not available
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, markwh04, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/22
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/12
      
      Message not available
      Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 2005/08/09
- Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 2005/08/07
- Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/07
- Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/08
- Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, markwh04, 2005/08/08
  - Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2005/08/08
- Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, PD, 2005/08/08
  - Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Androcles, 2005/08/11
Re: I have to be a GENIUS to be hated so much but they cannot admit a mistake, fbonsignore, 2005/08/06
- Re: I have to be a GENIUS to be hated so much but they cannot admit a mistake, Edward Green, 2005/08/06
  - Re: I have to be a GENIUS to be hated so much but they cannot admit a mistake, fbonsignore, 2005/08/07
Spin Foam in Geometric Analogy, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/06
- Re: Spin Foam in Geometric Analogy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/06
A Fine Null Theory Example, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/06
- Re: A Fine Null Theory Example, Uncle Al, 2005/08/06
  - Re: A Fine Null Theory Example, RichD, 2005/08/06
    - Re: A Fine Null Theory Example, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: A Fine Null Theory Example, Richard Herring, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: A Fine Null Theory Example, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/08
A Bare Analogy, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/06
- Re: A Bare Analogy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/06
- Re: A Bare Analogy, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/06
Time Papers By Nation 2: More on the Cold War and Hot War, OsherD, 2005/08/06
- Re: Time Papers By Nation 2: More on the Cold War and Hot War, persian ram, 2005/08/06
Article: Prediction of a Composite Particle Mass, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/06
- Re: Article: Prediction of a Composite Particle Mass, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/08
Article: On the First Generation of Stars, Robert Karl Stonjek, 2005/08/06
Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/06
- Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., John Sefton, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/08
    - Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bob Cain, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., TomGee, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., TomGee, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., TomGee, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Sam Wormley, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., TomGee, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., TomGee, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., feuerbac, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., feuerbac, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Jerry, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., TomGee, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Jerry, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., feuerbac, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 2005/08/09
How do I generate a Resolution V Fractional Factorial Design Array?, ggroups . anoop, 2005/08/06
Time Papers By Nation, OsherD, 2005/08/06
- Re: Time Papers By Nation, OsherD, 2005/08/06
A Quantum Theory, Defined in Detonation Reaction Terms, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/06
- Re: A Quantum Theory, Defined in Detonation Reaction Terms, Uncle Al, 2005/08/06
  - Re: A Quantum Theory, Defined in Detonation Reaction Terms, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/06
A Natural Pit, Seven Gallon Pail Thermonuke, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/06
- Re: A Natural Pit, Seven Gallon Pail Thermonuke, e1TymPadz, 2005/08/10
  - Re: A Natural Pit, Seven Gallon Pail Thermonuke, Douglas Eagleson, 2005/08/11
"Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Smialc, 2005/08/06
- Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Sam Wormley, 2005/08/06
- Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Uncle Al, 2005/08/06
- Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", the softrat, 2005/08/07
MOV Lightning Protection In A Residence ?, Robert11, 2005/08/06
- Re: MOV Lightning Protection In A Residence ?, John Popelish, 2005/08/06
Feynman Double slit experiment and others, unamerican, 2005/08/06
- Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, Front Office, 2005/08/06
  - Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, unamerican, 2005/08/06
    - Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, Robert Kolker, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, unamerican, 2005/08/06
    - Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, Edward Green, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, unamerican, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, Torkel Franzen, 2005/08/08
- Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, Jim Black, 2005/08/06
- Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, Uncle Al, 2005/08/06
- Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/08
Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, a_plutonium, 2005/08/06
- Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Jim Black, 2005/08/06
- Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, a_plutonium, 2005/08/06
  - Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/06
    - Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, a_plutonium, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/08
- Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Jim Black, 2005/08/07
  - Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, a_plutonium, 2005/08/07
    - Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 2005/08/07
    - supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, a_plutonium, 2005/08/07
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Barry in Maryland, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/09
      
      Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Odysseus, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, a_plutonium, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, a_plutonium, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Prai Jei, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Attila the Bum, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Attila the Bum, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/10
Triple Codes 4: ArXiv Triple-Time and Double-Time Papers, OsherD, 2005/08/06
Triple Codes 3: Logics and Probabilities, OsherD, 2005/08/06
Einstein had to survive his education, Nick, 2005/08/06
- Re: Einstein had to survive his education, unamerican, 2005/08/06
  - Re: Einstein had to survive his education, mazafaka, 2005/08/06
    - Re: Einstein had to survive his education, unamerican, 2005/08/06
  - Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Androcles, 2005/08/06
    - Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Sue..., 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Sue..., 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Ken S. Tucker, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Androcles, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Androcles, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Einstein had to survive his education, T Wake, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Math Freak, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Einstein had to survive his education, T Wake, 2005/08/11
    - Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Androcles, 2005/08/08
- Re: Einstein had to survive his education, T Wake, 2005/08/06
- Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Bilge, 2005/08/06
  - Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Nick, 2005/08/07
    - Re: Einstein had to survive his education, T Wake, 2005/08/07
- Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/06
- Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/08
  - Re: Einstein had to survive his education, John Kennaugh, 2005/08/24
- Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Math Freak, 2005/08/11
Playing with Ruth-Aaron Pairs, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/06
- Re: Playing with Ruth-Aaron Pairs, Uncle Al, 2005/08/06
Easy Striders: New humanoids with efficient gaits change the robotics landscape, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/06
Bigger than Pluto: Tenth planet or icy leftover?, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/06
operator trace, Edward Green, 2005/08/06
- Re: operator trace, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2005/08/06
- Re: operator trace, carlos, 2005/08/06
- Re: operator trace, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2005/08/06
  - Re: operator trace, Timothy Murphy, 2005/08/06
    - Re: operator trace, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2005/08/06
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: operator trace, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: operator trace, Edward Green, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: operator trace, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: operator trace, Edward Green, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: operator trace, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: operator trace, Edward Green, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: operator trace, Edward Green, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: operator trace, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: operator trace, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: operator trace, Gregory L. Hansen, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: operator trace, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: operator trace, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 2005/08/10
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: operator trace, Puppet_Sock, 2005/08/09
  - Re: operator trace, Lee Rudolph, 2005/08/06
    - Re: operator trace, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2005/08/06
- Re: operator trace, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 2005/08/07
  - Re: operator trace, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2005/08/07
    - Re: operator trace, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: operator trace, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2005/08/07
Hydrogen result causes controversy, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/05
- Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Edward Green, 2005/08/06
  - Message not available
    - Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, mmeron, 2005/08/06
  - Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, The Ghost In The Machine, 2005/08/06
  - Message not available
    - Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Uncle Al, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Richard Herring, 2005/08/11
- Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Y.Porat, 2005/08/06
  - Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/06
- Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/08
- Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Math Freak, 2005/08/08
  - Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/09
THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT IS AN ILLUSION, ACE, 2005/08/05
- Message not available
  - Message not available
    - Re: THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT IS AN ILLUSION, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/06
- THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT IS AN ILLUSION, ACE, 2005/08/07
  - Re: THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT IS AN ILLUSION, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/07
Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/05
- Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/20
  - Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light., Androcles, 2005/08/20
ScienceWeek Has a New Message Board, ScienceWeek, 2005/08/05
Is the weak force really a force?, franklinhu, 2005/08/05
- Re: Is the weak force really a force?, T Wake, 2005/08/05
  - Re: Is the weak force really a force?, T Wake, 2005/08/05
    - Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Henry Haapalainen, 2005/08/05
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, T Wake, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, T Wake, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Henry Haapalainen, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Mike, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Henry Haapalainen, 2005/08/07
- Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Uncle Al, 2005/08/05
  - Re: Is the weak force really a force?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/05
- Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 2005/08/05
- Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 2005/08/05
- Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Michael Moroney, 2005/08/05
- Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Nick, 2005/08/05
  - Re: Is the weak force really a force?, T Wake, 2005/08/06
    - Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Orion, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 2005/08/09
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 2005/08/10
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 2005/08/11
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 2005/08/12
      
      Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 2005/08/12
- Electroweak is a Yang-Mills force (was: Is the weak force really a force?), markwh04, 2005/08/08
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/05
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/08
  - Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Bruce Scott TOK, 2005/08/08
My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/05
- Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Uncle Al, 2005/08/05
  - Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/06
- Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Charles, 2005/08/05
  - Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/06
- Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/06
  - Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/06
    - Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/08
- Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/07
  - Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/07
    - Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Aydin, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Schoenfeld, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/08
  - Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, tgdenning, 2005/08/07
    - Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, tgdenning, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, tgdenning, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, tgdenning, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, tgdenning, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, PD, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Androcles, 2005/08/11
- Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Mitchell Jones, 2005/08/09
  - Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/10
    - Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Mitchell Jones, 2005/08/10
- My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 2005/08/05
The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, AJW, 2005/08/05
- Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/05
  - Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, PD, 2005/08/05
    - Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, tj Frazir, 2005/08/05
      
      Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, night dalits, 2005/08/05
      
      Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, T Wake, 2005/08/06
    - Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/05
      
      Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Boris Mohar, 2005/08/08
  - Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, tj Frazir, 2005/08/05
    - Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, T Wake, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Richard Tobin, 2005/08/06
- Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Uncle Al, 2005/08/05
  - Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 2005/08/05
- Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/08
  - Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Uncle Al, 2005/08/08
    - Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/08
- Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Scismgenie, 2005/08/08
  - Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Scismgenie, 2005/08/08
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 740 August 5, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 2005/08/05
- Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 740 August 5, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Andy Resnick, 2005/08/08
Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space, the softrat, 2005/08/05
- Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space, Randy Poe, 2005/08/05
  - Re: Relative Movement vs. Moving through Space, Paul Stowe, 2005/08/06
Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, July 2005, Mark Fergerson, 2005/08/05
- Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, July 2005, Dr. Flonkenstein, 2005/08/05
  - Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, July 2005, Mark Fergerson, 2005/08/05
    - Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, July 2005, Dr. Flonkenstein, 2005/08/05
- Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, July 2005, Sean Monaghan, 2005/08/05
  - Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, July 2005, PJR, 2005/08/05
- Message not available
  - NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Cujo DeSockpuppet, 2005/08/05
    - Message not available
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Art Deco, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Dr. Flonkenstein, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Brian Mailman, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Aratzio, 2005/08/06
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Cujo DeSockpuppet, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Aratzio, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, ah, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Aratzio, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Cujo DeSockpuppet, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, ah, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Aratzio, 2005/08/07
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, ah, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Aratzio, 2005/08/08
      
      Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, ah, 2005/08/08