sci.physics (date)

sci.physics (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

August 30, 2005

Re: Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3, OsherD, 16:22
Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry, Sam Wormley, 16:20
Re: ing dumbasses dont know any physics and post shit, tj Frazir, 16:10
Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry, Quantum Mirror, 16:05
Re: Hurricane Katrina bugging out thoughts, tj Frazir, 16:04
Re: Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3, OsherD, 16:02
Re: Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand, Timo Nieminen, 16:00
Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3, OsherD, 15:55
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 15:51
Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:36
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 15:31
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., PD, 15:09
Probability Amplitudes and Black Holes, Mike Speed, 15:02
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 14:38
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, nightlight, 14:32
Re: Is Photon a Point Particle?, Igor, 14:28
Re: Found a photo of Uncle Al, Uncle Al, 14:22
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 14:17
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 14:14
Re: SFT and entanglement, John Sefton, 14:11
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 743 August 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stei, Andy Resnick, 14:07
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., Igor, 14:05
Re: Why the Universe Exists, Zeb Glittering, 14:04
Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful, 2ndPostulateDude, 13:57
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, John Sefton, 13:53
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 13:52
Found a photo of Uncle Al, Helmut Wabnig, 13:48
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Helmut Wabnig, 13:37
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, nightlight, 13:35
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 13:23
Re: Aluminum Sequin can eliminate all hurricanes in 2006 Re:, a_plutonium, 13:17
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 13:11
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 13:08
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 13:01
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 12:59
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 12:58
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 12:56
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 12:56
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 12:56
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 743 August 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stei, Sam Wormley, 12:50
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 12:49
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 12:46
Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry, Sam Wormley, 12:43
Re: Free pedagogic comic book on electromagnetic!, Sam Wormley, 12:41
Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful, Sam Wormley, 12:38
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 12:36
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 12:32
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 12:32
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, msadkins04, 12:27
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 12:18
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 12:13
Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Uncle Al, 12:11
Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, Paul Cardinale, 12:07
Re: The Ether is the past, Uncle Al, 12:07
Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, Uncle Al, 12:05
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 12:04
Re: If an equal arm scale balances, Uncle Al, 11:59
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 11:59
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, Spoonfed, 11:57
Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Sam Wormley, 11:56
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 743 August 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 11:53
Re: Chirality and parity, Uncle Al, 11:50
Re: If an equal arm scale balances, Mark Fergerson, 11:48
Re: If an equal arm scale balances, Steve Ralph, 11:47
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 11:47
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, PD, 11:39
Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", donstockbauer, 11:38
"Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Levart, 11:27
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 11:18
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Randy Poe, 11:01
Re: Itax payers GAVE 4,000 USD this year., tj Frazir, 10:56
Re: Chirality and isotropy, tj Frazir, 10:53
Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, jimp, 10:49
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, John Sefton, 10:49
Re: My user Ult ing PC dumbass, tj Frazir, 10:44
Re: Hurricane Katrina Comments and Questions, tj Frazir, 10:35
Motion Through Space Is Meaningful, 2ndPostulateDude, 10:34
Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 10:25
Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 10:23
Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 10:21
Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 10:19
Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 10:18
Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 10:17
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 10:16
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 10:14
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 10:11
Re: If an equal arm scale balances, Paul Cardinale, 10:08
Re: "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium., Douglas Eagleson, 10:05
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 09:28
Re: Why the Universe Exists, jmfbahciv, 09:23
Re: SFT and entanglement, Dr Photon, 09:17
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 09:14
Re: If an equal arm scale balances, Don1, 09:13
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Don1, 09:07
Re: SFT and entanglement, Dr Photon, 08:50
Re: Sprinkler cools dog days..., Andy Resnick, 08:43
Re: Why the Universe Exists, Zeb Glittering, 08:42
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 08:33
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 08:29
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 08:25
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 08:25
Re: Mass don't leak, Mark Martin, 08:23
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 08:10
Re: If an equal arm scale balances, pete, 08:06
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 08:02
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 08:01
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 07:52
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 07:50
Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 07:50
Re: United Nations moving to China!, jmfbahciv, 07:50
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 07:48
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 07:44
Re: The Ether is the past, |-|erc, 07:39
Re: SFT and entanglement, Dr Photon, 07:39
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 07:37
Re: SFT and entanglement, Dr Photon, 07:36
Re: Red Shift Claim, Dr Nanduri, 07:35
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 07:31
Re: SFT and entanglement, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 07:30
Re: "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium., Dr Nanduri, 07:20
Re: The Ether is the past, donstockbauer, 07:16
Re: The Ether is the past, donstockbauer, 07:15
Re: The Ether is the past, donstockbauer, 07:15
Re: Why the Universe Exists, Zeb Glittering, 07:15
Re: The Ether is the past, donstockbauer, 07:13
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 06:44
Re: Why the Universe Exists, jmfbahciv, 06:40
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 06:29
The Ether is the past, |-|erc, 06:26
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 06:18
Free pedagogic comic book on electromagnetic!, Atar, 05:58
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 05:24
Re: SFT and entanglement, tony fleming, 05:17
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 05:13
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 04:56
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 04:36
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 04:36
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 04:35
Re: Chirality and isotropy, brian a m stuckless, 04:23
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 04:23
Re: Tell the Martians that Eddie says 'Hi', nightbat, 03:18
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., RP, 02:33
Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, Robert Kolker, 02:26
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Robert Kolker, 02:23
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., Robert Kolker, 02:20
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., Nick, 02:13
Re: NATURE article about dust affecting climate; Aluminum Sequin as Earth Air Conditioner, dcholiman, 02:12
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., RP, 01:52
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., RP, 01:38
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., Nick, 01:32
Re: Tell the Martians that Eddie says 'Hi', Twittering One, 01:29
Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 2, OsherD, 01:28
Re: Tell the Martians that Eddie says 'Hi', Twittering One, 01:24
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., RP, 01:22
Tell the Martians that Eddie says 'Hi', Greysky, 01:19
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 01:07
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., macromitch, 01:03
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., TomGee, 00:53
Re: spring vibrations in space, Monitek, 00:45
Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, Sam Wormley, 00:44
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., Sam Wormley, 00:40
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., macromitch, 00:39
Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry, macromitch, 00:36
Re: Seperation of Atheism and State., RP, 00:36
Seperation of Atheism and State., macromitch, 00:30
Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare, Raktizer Omheit, 00:11

August 29, 2005

Re: Chirality and isotropy, Richard Schultz, 23:40
Re: Induction cookers, Autymn D. C., 23:14
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT:THE SPACE STRETCH, Nick, 23:04
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, Spoonfed, 22:58
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 22:51
Re: Mass don't leak, Nick, 22:26
Re: Mass don't leak, TMG, 22:15
Re: Mass don't leak, TMG, 22:14
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, donstockbauer, 22:07
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 22:03
Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry, donstockbauer, 21:58
Re: If an equal arm scale balances, donstockbauer, 21:55
Re: Is Photon a Point Particle?, Orion, 21:46
If an equal arm scale balances, Don1, 20:47
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 20:45
Re: Mass don't leak, Nick, 20:38
Re: Mass don't leak, Nick, 20:34
Re: spring vibrations in space, Autymn D. C., 20:15
Re: Mass don't leak, Ugo, 20:08
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 20:06
Chirality and parity, Edward Green, 19:55
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Autymn D. C., 19:52
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:45
Sprinkler cools dog days..., Edward Green, 19:45
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 19:44
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 19:42
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:36
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Paul Stowe, 19:24
Re: Mass don't leak, Henry Haapalainen, 19:22
Re: The fallacy of black holes, Autymn D. C., 19:08
Re: Mass don't leak, Nick, 18:43
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Jim Spriggs, 18:37
Photon Splitting Inquiry, Potte, 18:28
Re: Science Equipment ID needed, Mark Martin, 18:19
Re: A basic question, Edward Green, 18:05
Re: A Theory of Knowledge or Eagleson's Logic, Uncle Al, 18:04
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 18:00
Finding geodesic for general metric, p . scadden, 17:38
Re: Why the Universe Exists, donstockbauer, 17:35
Re: Stern-Gerlach experiment is not quantized, Attila the Bum, 17:01
Re: Mass don't leak, tadchem, 16:49
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 16:28
Re: Mass don't leak, Ugo, 16:19
Re: Science Equipment ID needed, rhvp65, 16:17
Re: Science Equipment ID needed, rhvp65, 16:16
Re: Why the Universe Exists, Rene Tschaggelar, 15:57
Re: "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium., Sam Wormley, 15:57
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 15:56
Re: Mass don't leak, Nick, 15:48
Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?, Mike, 15:46
Re: A Theory of Knowledge or Eagleson's Logic, Douglas Eagleson, 15:39
Re: "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium., Quantum Mirror, 15:38
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 15:34
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Orion, 15:15
Re: speed of gravity, Traveler, 15:14
Re: Aluminum Sequin can eliminate all hurricanes in 2006 Re:, donstockbauer, 15:00
Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Uncle Al, 14:57
Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Uncle Al, 14:57
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Uncle Al, 14:56
Re: Uncle Al re magnet wire, Uncle Al, 14:55
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 14:50
Re: speed of gravity, Uncle Al, 14:49
Re: SFT and entanglement, Uncle Al, 14:47
Re: A Theory of Knowledge or Eagleson's Logic, Uncle Al, 14:40
Re: newton's first law, Uncle Al, 14:37
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:37
Re: A model of Reality, fbonsignore, 14:36
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 14:31
Re: Science Equipment ID needed, Uncle Al, 14:24
Re: SFT and entanglement, Dr Photon, 14:22
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 14:03
Re: Stern-Gerlach experiment is not quantized, Uncle Al, 14:03
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 14:00
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 13:44
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 13:41
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 13:21
"Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium., Sam Wormley, 13:06
Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature, Andy Resnick, 12:55
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 12:54
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 12:46
Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields, tony fleming, 12:38
Aluminum Sequin can eliminate all hurricanes in 2006 Re:, a_plutonium, 12:32
Re: Chirality and isotropy, srp, 12:20

August 28, 2005

Re: Hurricane Katrina Comments and Questions TAO Jesica sank, tj Frazir, 21:33
Re: Hurricane Katrina Comments and Questions, tj Frazir, 21:28
Re: Science Equipment ID needed, Mark Martin, 21:20
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 21:18
Re: United Nations moving to China!, mmeron, 21:17
newton's first law, francisco, 21:15
Re: Mass don't leak, Mark Martin, 21:09
Re: Mass don't leak, Nick, 21:04
Re: Mass don't leak, Double-A, 21:03
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Autymn D. C., 21:01
Re: Mass don't leak, TMG, 20:59
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Herman Trivilino, 20:50
Re: Mass don't leak, Nick, 20:39
Re: Another billion dollar idea!, Mark Martin, 20:36
Re: Mass don't leak, TMG, 20:31
Re: There Are No Black Holes ... Just points of departure for which there is no return---Think Again, Art Deco, 20:12
Three Little Known Amazing Observations by Three Great Inventors, rk73737, 20:09
Mass don't leak, Nick, 19:44
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, John Sefton, 19:41
Re: LiTTLE iMPs ..a GR MYSTERY.!!, Proginoskes, 19:29
Science Equipment ID needed, R.H., 19:18
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 19:13
Re: How to make blue light?, Randy Poe, 19:12
Re: How to make blue light?, Jim Spriggs, 19:07
Re: The fallacy of black holes, tadchem, 19:06
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, T Wake, 19:05
Re: How to make blue light?, Autymn D. C., 19:04
Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Henry Haapalainen, 18:50
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Randy Poe, 18:42
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, tadchem, 18:39
Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Uncle Al, 18:29
Re: Why the Universe Exists, Robert Kolker, 18:27
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, John Sefton, 18:16
Re: News regarding NASA's Webb Space Telescope, Uncle Al, 18:12
Re: what is mind ???, Uncle Al, 18:06
Re: what is mind ???, Henry Haapalainen, 18:04
Re: Another billion dollar idea!, Uncle Al, 18:03
Re: The fallacy of black holes, freddy osbourne, 18:03
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, donstockbauer, 17:55
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Uncle Al, 17:55
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:51
Re: question 1, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:51
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Herman Trivilino, 17:44
Re: Why the Universe Exists, Henry Haapalainen, 17:41
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:38
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:38
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:38
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:38
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:38
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:38
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:38
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:38
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:38
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:38
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:37
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:37
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:37
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:37
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:37
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:37
Re: YOUR SHIT GET OUT, tj Frazir, 17:36
Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", donstockbauer, 17:35
Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", Sam Wormley, 17:33
Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter", donstockbauer, 17:31
"The Matter of "Dark Matter", Cino, 17:28
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 17:05
Re: Stochastic Processes: Gaussian, Second-Order, etc., OsherD, 15:56
Re: Stochastic Processes: Gaussian, Second-Order, etc., OsherD, 15:48
Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Jim Black, 15:26
Stochastic Processes: Gaussian, Second-Order, etc., OsherD, 15:18
Re: AP assessment of his ideas; Wikipedia, Mike, 14:57
Re: Mass & inertia are equivalent, Mike, 14:52
Re: About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks, FrediFizzx, 14:43
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Paul Stowe, 14:24
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:19
Mass & inertia are equivalent, Don1, 14:13
AP assessment of his ideas; Wikipedia, a_plutonium, 14:05
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:04
Re: Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand, AlexG, 13:52
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Androcles, 13:37
Re: INTRUDER ALERT! was Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Ian St. John, 13:36
Re: Another Afrimax tanker in distress gulf DUR993, tj Frazir, 13:29
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Ian St. John, 13:23
Re: My prediction is coming true: 5 devastating hurricanes for Florida 2005 due to 4 in 2004, a_plutonium, 13:19
Re: Another billion dollar idea!, tj Frazir, 12:46
Re: Another billion dollar idea!, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:27
Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 12:26
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Edward Green, 12:17
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 12:11
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Edward Green, 12:10
Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 12:07
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Androcles, 12:07
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 12:03
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Androcles, 12:01
Re: what is mind ???, Robert Kolker, 12:01
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 11:59
Re: Continuous Verbal Knowledge and Continuous Universe, OsherD, 11:57
Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 11:56
Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 11:56
Re: Chirality and isotropy, hanson, 11:56
Re: What is empty space made of, Y.Porat, 11:49
Re: Continuous Verbal Knowledge and Continuous Universe, OsherD, 11:45
Continuous Verbal Knowledge and Continuous Universe, OsherD, 11:37
Re: How to make blue light?, jimp, 11:32
Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 11:27
News regarding NASA's Webb Space Telescope, Mike, 11:24
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 11:10
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 11:03
Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 11:01
Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 11:01
Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships, OsherD, 10:58
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 10:56
Re: Another billion dollar idea!, tj Frazir, 10:37
Re: spring vibrations in space, AJW, 10:34
Re: Another billion dollar idea!, tj Frazir, 10:21
Re: what is mind ???, donstockbauer, 10:17
Re: a simple dynamic problem consultion, srp, 10:05
Re: what is mind ???, tdp1001, 10:02
Re: Dramatis Personae III, donstockbauer, 10:00
Re: Motion consists of two kinds, tj Frazir, 09:58
Re: How to make blue light?, Ian Stirling, 09:57
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 09:55
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 09:52
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, donstockbauer, 09:44
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 09:34
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 09:27
Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 09:26
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 09:25
Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 09:23
Re: Red Shift Claim, Douglas Eagleson, 09:22
Re: spring vibrations in space, Sam Wormley, 09:09
Re: Why the Universe Exists, Zeb Glittering, 08:55
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bilge, 08:33
Re: Motion consists of two kinds, Don1, 08:27
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 08:26
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Don1, 08:23
Re: Why the Universe Exists, Zeb Glittering, 08:18
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 08:15
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, tony fleming, 08:02
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 07:45
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Androcles, 07:40
Re: what is mind ???, Androcles, 07:30
Re: Why the Universe Exists, jmfbahciv, 07:28
Re: UNCERTAiNTY Principle REDUNDANT.!!, Billinares, 07:21
Re: Another billion dollar idea!, Mark Martin, 07:18
Re: Light, matter, time, space; Gravity, Henry Haapalainen, 07:11
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 07:02
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 07:02
Re: Another billion dollar idea!, Androcles, 06:52
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 06:47
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Androcles, 06:46
Re: United Nations moving to China!, jmfbahciv, 06:42
Re: UNCERTAiNTY Principle REDUNDANT.!!, Martin Hogbin, 06:41
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Y.Porat, 06:35
spring vibrations in space, Bernhard Kuemel, 06:25
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 05:59
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 05:58
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, T Wake, 05:57
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, T Wake, 05:56
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, T Wake, 05:55
UNCERTAiNTY Principle REDUNDANT.!!, brian a m stuckless, 05:19
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Autymn D. C., 05:11
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 04:58
Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 04:39
LiTTLE iMPs ..a GR MYSTERY.!!, brian a m stuckless, 04:34
UNcertainty PRiNCiPLE UNnecessary .!!, brian a m stuckless, 04:34
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 04:19
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 04:18
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Jim Black, 04:10
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 04:04
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Double-A, 04:02
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Double-A, 04:01
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Double-A, 04:00
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 03:58
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 03:57
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 03:56
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 03:51
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 03:50
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 03:45
Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 03:43
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 03:40
Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 03:37
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 03:37
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 03:36
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 03:34
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 03:33
Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 03:33
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 03:31
Super-heavy magnetic vector boson predicted at the 2 TeV scale!, CFDIII, 03:30
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 03:28
what is mind ???, Udayan, 03:25
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 03:23
Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 03:21
Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 03:18
Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, donstockbauer, 03:15
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 03:13
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 03:11
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Schoenfeld, 03:03
Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed, Bob, 02:59
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Schoenfeld, 02:46
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 02:40
Re: Conservative Scientists, Clave, 02:40
Re: Quantum Complex Stochastics 2, OsherD, 02:39
Re: Quantum Complex Stochastics 2, OsherD, 02:30
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Y.Porat, 02:27
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Nick, 02:24
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, donstockbauer, 02:19
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Nick, 02:12
Re: Quantum Complex Stochastics 2, OsherD, 02:10
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 02:01
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 02:01
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 01:46
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Schoenfeld, 01:45
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 01:41
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 01:35
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 01:32
Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships, Schoenfeld, 01:17
Re: United Nations moving to China!, mmeron, 01:06
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 01:06
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, the softrat, 00:59
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Shatzer, 00:58
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Sam Wormley, 00:57
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Autymn D. C., 00:50
Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature, Autymn D. C., 00:47
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 00:45
Quantum Complex Stochastics 2, OsherD, 00:34
Re: Light, matter, time, space; Gravity, Nick, 00:30
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Shatzer, 00:29
Re: Light, matter, time, space; Gravity, Nick, 00:23
Re: question 1, the softrat, 00:22
Re: Reaching planck's energy, Autymn D. C., 00:21
Re: Light, matter, time, space; Gravity, M31, 00:19
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, M31, 00:17
Light, matter, time, space; Gravity, Nick, 00:17
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, M31, 00:12
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, M31, 00:09

August 27, 2005

Re: How to make blue light?, Autymn D. C., 23:48
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Randy Poe, 23:45
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Sam Wormley, 23:38
Another billion dollar idea!, tdp1001, 23:38
Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, Greg Neill, 23:34
Re: Physicists in Germany have created a material that is harder than diamond, Autymn D. C., 23:27
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Autymn D. C., 23:26
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 23:23
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 23:09
Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?, M31, 23:09
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Autymn D. C., 23:04
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 23:02
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Autymn D. C., 23:01
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Autymn D. C., 22:51
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 22:33
Re: Reaching planck's energy, Orion, 22:31
Re: neutrino wave question, Autymn D. C., 22:30
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, PD, 22:29
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Autymn D. C., 22:21
Quantum Complex Stochastics, OsherD, 22:19
a simple dynamic problem consultion, idyllic . math, 22:11
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 22:11
Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships, OsherD, 22:11
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tj Frazir, 22:11
Re: A few questions about string theory, Nick, 21:56
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 21:52
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, tj Frazir, 21:44
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 21:20
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Sam Wormley, 21:08
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 21:05
A few questions about string theory, cyberdude, 21:00
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Autymn D. C., 20:52
Re: Conservative Scientists, Clave, 20:49
Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", the softrat, 20:44
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Traveler, 20:43
Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships, OsherD, 20:31
Re: question 1, francisco, 20:27
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 20:20
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 20:19
Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 20:19
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Potte, 20:17
Re: Chirality and isotropy, hanson, 20:16
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 20:00
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:52
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:50
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Paul Stowe, 19:49
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:48
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 19:46
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 19:44
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:41
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:40
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 19:36
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:35
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:33
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 19:32
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:29
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 19:26
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:26
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:25
GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS, ACE, 19:25
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:23
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:22
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:22
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:19
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:13
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:09
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 19:03
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 19:02
Re: question 1, The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 18:48
Article: Einstein and Quantizing Chaos, Robert Karl Stonjek, 18:43
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 18:34
Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Akira Bergman, 18:24
Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Akira Bergman, 18:08
Mach's Principle from Wheeler-Feynman Teleology, Jack Sarfatti, 18:00
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 17:40
TORSION FIELDS, Jack Sarfatti, 17:39
Re: What is empty space made of, Akira Bergman, 17:30
question 1, francisco, 17:24
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:06
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:02
Flying Saucer/Star Gate Physics Lectures, Jack Sarfatti, 16:55
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:55
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Herman Trivilino, 16:47
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 16:33
Re: How to make blue light?, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:30
Simple Bernoulli question, Edward Green, 15:58
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Golden Boar, 15:26
Re: Motion consists of two kinds, Mike, 15:20
Re: Why the Universe Exists, Mike, 15:13
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 15:00
My prediction is coming true: 5 devastating hurricanes for Florida 2005 due to 4 in 2004, a_plutonium, 14:53
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 14:51
Re: Motion consists of two kinds, john_ramsden, 14:25
Re: Motion consists of two kinds, Uncle Al, 14:07
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 14:05
Re: Why the Universe Exists, Uncle Al, 14:02
Re: All science was once philosophy, Tron, 13:59
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Uncle Al, 13:54
Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Martin Hogbin, 13:51
Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 13:48
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 13:46
Re: How to make blue light?, Uncle Al, 13:46
Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Mike, 13:44
Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 13:39
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 13:38
Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships, Schoenfeld, 13:31
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 13:24
Re: How to make blue light?, jimp, 13:19
Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships, OsherD, 12:43
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Dave Thompson, 12:34
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 12:30
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 12:28
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:19
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 12:16
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 12:12
The Sarfatti Lectures On The Origin of Gravity and Inertia 1 & 2, Jack Sarfatti, 12:09
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Mitchell Jones, 12:09
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 12:06
Re: Conservative Scientists, Dave Thompson, 12:05
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 12:05
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 12:00
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 11:59
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 11:57
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 11:55
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bilge, 11:55
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Don1, 11:50
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 11:49
Re: How to make blue light?, CWatters, 11:47
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 11:44
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:40
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:39
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:37
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:31
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:31
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:26
Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Sam Wormley, 11:22
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 11:22
"Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Lecnac, 11:21
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 11:20
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 11:18
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 11:16
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:16
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:15
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 11:15
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 11:13
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 11:13
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:12
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Sam Wormley, 11:06
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:04
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:02
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:01
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Clemens W, 11:01
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 11:00
Re: Motion consists of two kinds, Sam Wormley, 11:00
Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 10:59
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Clemens W, 10:57
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 10:54
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 10:53
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 10:51
Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies, Michael Moroney, 10:51
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 10:49
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Don1, 10:48
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 10:45
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, tadchem, 10:45
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 10:45
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 10:41
Motion consists of two kinds, Don1, 10:36
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Aydin, 10:34
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 10:32
Why the Universe Exists, Zeb Glittering, 10:26
simple question about heat conductivity, Aydin, 10:26
Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Zigoteau, 10:24
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Sam Wormley, 10:21
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 10:20
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Sam Wormley, 10:14
Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 10:13
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:10
Re: Complex Probabilities, OsherD, 10:05
Re: About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks, Sam Wormley, 10:01
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Herman Trivilino, 09:51
Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 09:41
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 09:37
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 09:37
Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 09:21
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 09:04
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 09:00
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 08:59
Re: Conservative Scientists, greg byshenk, 08:58
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Y.Porat, 08:46
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 08:38
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 08:11
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 08:09
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 08:09
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 08:04
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 08:02
Re: Complex Probabilities, Schoenfeld, 08:01
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 07:59
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 07:57
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 07:55
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 07:54
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 07:53
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 07:53
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 07:53
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 07:49
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 07:49
Re: Take this bullshit 1000 post of worthless crap, T Wake, 07:48
Re: Take this bullshit outa here dumb s, T Wake, 07:47
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 07:46
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 07:44
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 07:35
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 07:32
Re: United Nations moving to China!, jmfbahciv, 07:30
Re: Complex Probabilities, OsherD, 07:02
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 06:24
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 06:21
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 06:18
Re: Chirality and isotropy, T Wake, 06:16
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, T Wake, 06:16
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:59
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 05:58
Re: Mach's Principle and Negative Gravity, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 05:55
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 04:59
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Y.Porat, 04:47
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 04:07
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Odysseus, 04:02
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 04:01
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Golden Boar, 03:57
Re: How to make blue light?, Jim Spriggs, 03:48
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 03:41
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 03:31
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 03:17
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bilge, 03:16
Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, Androcles, 03:14
Re: How to make blue light?, peter, 03:14
Re: How to make blue light?, Jim Spriggs, 03:12
Re: How to make blue light?, Jim Spriggs, 03:08
Re: Take this bullshit 1000 post of worthless crap, TokaMundo, 03:05
Re: About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks, Greysky, 03:05
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Jon Bell, 02:29
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 02:23
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 02:21
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 02:17
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 02:14
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 02:13
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 01:59
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 01:58
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 01:54
Re: Dirac's aether, Nick, 01:54
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Nick, 01:52
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 01:46
Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 01:46
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 01:44
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 01:42
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Helmut Wabnig, 01:42
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Golden Boar, 01:41
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 01:41
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 01:37
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 01:34
Complex Probabilities, OsherD, 01:33
Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Nick, 01:32
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 01:28
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 01:18
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 01:17
Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, mountain man, 01:08
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Sam Wormley, 01:06
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Y.Porat, 01:05
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 01:04
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 01:02
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Y.Porat, 00:57
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 00:56
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 00:56
Re: How to make blue light?, tj Frazir, 00:54
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 00:48
Re: Acceleration using ticker timer, Sam Wormley, 00:40
Re: How to make blue light?, tj Frazir, 00:39
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Shatzer, 00:38
Re: Primes, Palindromes, and Pyramids, Jim Spriggs, 00:36
Re: Conservative Scientists, Jim Lovejoy, 00:35
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 00:35
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 00:35
Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature, tj Frazir, 00:35
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 00:35
Acceleration using ticker timer, jamesy123, 00:31
Primes, Palindromes, and Pyramids, Sam Wormley, 00:18
Re: How to make blue light?, Jim Spriggs, 00:07

August 26, 2005

PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 August 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 23:57
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 23:56
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 23:56
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 23:56
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 23:56
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 23:56
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 23:56
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 23:56
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 23:56
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 23:55
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 23:54
Re: How to make blue light?, John Popelish, 23:38
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 23:32
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Schoenfeld, 23:23
Re: How to make blue light?, jimp, 23:17
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tj Frazir, 23:17
Re: How to make blue light?, donstockbauer, 23:11
Re: Reaching planck's energy, Akira Bergman, 23:04
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 23:04
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 22:52
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 22:40
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 22:38
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 22:35
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Potte, 22:27
Reaching planck's energy, Orion, 22:27
Re: Go to alt ing stupid asses, tj Frazir, 22:24
Re: Take this bullshit 1000 post of worthless crap, tj Frazir, 22:24
Re: Take this bullshit 1000 post of worthless crap, tj Frazir, 22:24
Re: Take this bullshit outa here dumb s, tj Frazir, 22:24
Re: Take this bullshit outa here dumb s, tj Frazir, 22:24
Re: Take this bullshit outa here dumb s, tj Frazir, 22:23
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Potte, 22:17
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 22:14
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, donstockbauer, 22:08
Re: There Are No Black Holes ... Just points of departure for which there is no return---Think Again, Rising Loonie, 22:05
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 22:04
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 22:00
How to make blue light?, Jim Spriggs, 22:00
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:56
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:51
About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks, Sam Wormley, 21:51
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:49
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:48
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Richard Henry, 21:48
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:46
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:45
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:44
Re: Induction cookers, tdp1001, 21:43
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 21:43
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Richard Henry, 21:42
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:41
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, boo, 21:37
Re: There Are No Black Holes ... Just points of departure for which there is no return---Think Again, nightbat, 21:35
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:31
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 21:30
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, boo, 21:29
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:26
Re: Chirality and isotropy, tj Frazir, 21:25
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 21:24
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:24
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 21:22
Re: Dramatis Personae III, western1lands, 21:19
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 21:18
Re: household physics question, tj Frazir, 21:16
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:16
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:14
Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, T Wake, 21:13
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, jimp, 21:12
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:12
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:10
Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, tj Frazir, 21:09
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 21:09
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:08
Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Nick, 21:07
Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, the softrat, 21:07
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 21:06
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 21:05
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:04
Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Nick, 21:04
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 21:01
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 21:01
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 21:01
Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Nick, 21:00
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 20:59
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 20:58
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 20:57
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 20:57
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 20:55
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 20:55
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 20:54
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 20:53
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., the softrat, 20:52
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 20:52
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 20:51
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 20:50
Re: Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand, the softrat, 20:50
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 20:50
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 20:49
Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", the softrat, 20:48
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 20:47
Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Akira Bergman, 20:46
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 20:44
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 20:43
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 20:40
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Edward Green, 20:38
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 20:34
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Jim Spriggs, 20:25
Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?, Akira Bergman, 20:25
Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY, tomcat, 20:23
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Orion, 20:21
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 20:19
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 20:19
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 20:19
Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, dbohara, 20:17
Re: H numbers, Jim Black, 20:16
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 20:15
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Sam Wormley, 20:13
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Eric Gisse, 20:12
Re: For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Eric Gisse, 20:10
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Orion, 19:54
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:44
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 19:43
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Edward Green, 19:42
For any given body; ft/(vt-vi)=ft^2/s; is a constant, Don1, 19:41
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Quantum Mirror, 19:38
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 19:36
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Potte, 19:35
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 19:32
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Sam Wormley, 19:29
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 19:21
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:18
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, jimp, 19:17
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 19:14
Re: H numbers, Akira Bergman, 19:13
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 19:12
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 19:09
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Traveler, 19:02
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:01
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:58
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:57
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Potte, 18:57
Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, Androcles, 18:57
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:57
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:53
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:52
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:50
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:49
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:48
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:48
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 18:47
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 18:45
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:43
Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, tj Frazir, 18:43
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 18:42
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, jimp, 18:39
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:37
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 18:31
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:30
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Potte, 18:29
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 18:27
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Potte, 18:26
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 18:26
Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, dbohara, 18:25
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:24
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 18:22
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 18:22
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 18:22
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 18:22
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 18:22
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 18:22
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 18:22
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 18:22
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 18:22
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:19
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 18:19
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 18:17
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:15
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Potte, 18:14
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:13
Re: household physics question, Edward Green, 18:12
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:12
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 18:12
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:11
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:10
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 18:08
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 18:07
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 18:06
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 18:05
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, e8xe8, 18:03
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 18:02
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:02
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 18:02
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 18:01
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 18:00
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 17:56
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 17:55
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 17:53
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 17:51
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 17:50
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 17:49
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 17:47
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 17:47
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 17:46
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 17:44
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 17:43
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 17:43
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 17:43
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 17:43
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 17:43
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 17:41
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 17:40
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 17:40
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 17:39
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:36
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:35
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 17:34
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:32
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 17:31
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:31
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 17:31
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:29
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 17:29
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:28
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:25
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:24
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 17:24
Re: household physics question, T Wake, 17:22
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 17:21
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 17:21
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:21
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Paul Stowe, 17:19
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 17:19
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:17
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 17:17
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 17:16
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Autymn D. C., 17:16
Re: The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape, Autymn D. C., 17:16
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 17:15
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:15
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:14
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:12
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 17:11
Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 17:11
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 17:11
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 17:11
Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 17:11
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 17:11
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 17:11
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 17:11
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 17:11
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:10
Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., Autymn D. C., 17:10
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:09
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 17:08
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 17:08
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:05
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 17:05
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 17:03
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:03
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 17:03
Re: International Space Agency, Weatherlawyer, 17:02
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 17:02
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 16:59
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 16:58
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 16:57
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:57
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:55
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 16:53
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 16:52
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 16:52
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 16:52
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 16:51
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 16:50
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 16:50
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 16:47
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 16:46
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 16:46
Physicists in Germany have created a material that is harder than diamond, Sam Wormley, 16:46
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lady Chatterly, 16:45
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:43
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:43
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:41
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Quantum Mirror, 16:40
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 16:34
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 16:34
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 16:22
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 16:18
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 16:18
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 16:14
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 16:13
Re: PBS special "Einstein's Big Idea", donstockbauer, 16:11
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 16:10
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 16:09
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 16:09
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 16:09
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 16:09
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 16:09
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 16:09
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 16:09
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 16:09
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 16:09
Re: There Are No Black Holes ... Just points of departure for which there is no return, Rising Loonie, 16:03
Re: United Nations moving to China!, mmeron, 16:00
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 16:00
Re: United Nations moving to China!, markwh04, 15:58
Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Androcles, 15:56
Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, Evgenij Barsukov, 15:54
Re: Induction cookers, donstockbauer, 15:53
Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Uncle Al, 15:52
Re: household physics question, Uncle Al, 15:50
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, boofreak, 15:49
Re: Induction cookers, Autymn D. C., 15:46
Re: India designs thorium reactor, tj Frazir, 15:45
Re: PBS special "Einstein's Big Idea", Uncle Al, 15:43
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Autymn D. C., 15:40
Re: household physics question, Sam Wormley, 15:38
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 15:35
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, donstockbauer, 15:35
Re: household physics question, donstockbauer, 15:29
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Richard Henry, 15:26
Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Autymn D. C., 15:23
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:18
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 15:17
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 15:15
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, John Sefton, 15:14
Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 15:07
Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 15:00
Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context, Tim Golden, 14:58
Re: household physics question, crowsmengegus, 14:45
Re: household physics question, crowsmengegus, 14:45
Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, Ian Parker, 14:37
Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., Robert Kolker, 14:35
Re: Mach's Principle and Negative Gravity, Autymn D. C., 14:26
International Space Agency, Victoria, 14:24
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 14:20
Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, a_plutonium, 14:13
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', John Sefton, 14:10
household physics question, at, 14:09
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 14:08
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 14:07
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Attila the Bum, 14:05
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 14:03
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Mark Martin, 14:02
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 14:01
Re: NATURE article about dust affecting climate; Aluminum Sequin as Earth Air Conditioner, a_plutonium, 13:58
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 13:57
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:56
Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, Evgenij Barsukov, 13:52
PBS special "Einstein's Big Idea", The TimeLord, 13:51
Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., Gregory L. Hansen, 13:51
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 13:49
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 13:49
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, greg byshenk, 13:47
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 13:45
Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Androcles, 13:43
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 13:33
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Gregory L. Hansen, 13:31
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 13:31
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 13:29
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 13:26
Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Androcles, 13:23
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 13:23
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 13:16
Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Uncle Al, 13:14
Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Uncle Al, 13:12
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 13:12
Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Uncle Al, 13:11
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 13:11
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 13:05
Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Uncle Al, 13:02
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Uncle Al, 12:59
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Ian Stirling, 12:56
Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Ian Parker, 12:54
Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, T Wake, 12:54
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 12:53
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 12:50
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 12:49
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 12:47
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 12:43
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 12:43
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 12:39
Re: neutrino wave question, Uncle Al, 12:39
Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Uncle Al, 12:38
Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Androcles, 12:36
Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Uncle Al, 12:36
Bohrn again, Dr Photon, 12:36
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 12:35
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, John Sefton, 12:35
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 12:33
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 12:32
Re: Conservative Scientists, Dave Thompson, 12:27
Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., Uncle Al, 12:25
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 12:24
Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 12:23
Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", John Sefton, 12:20
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 12:18
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 12:16
Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", John Sefton, 12:16
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 12:14
Re: What are these symbols in this formula?, curiousjohn4, 12:12
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 12:11
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 12:11
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 12:04
Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 12:00
Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Thomas Smid, 11:59
Re: Conservative Scientists, PD, 11:59
test, John Sefton, 11:57
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., John Sefton, 11:57
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 11:53
Re: Dirac's aether, Robert Kolker, 11:40
Re: Debating Uncertainty uncertainly, smurrish, 11:39
Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, T Wake, 11:38
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 11:38
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 11:37
Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Robert Kolker, 11:33
Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 11:32
Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, tj Frazir, 11:30
Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 11:21
Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, tj Frazir, 11:20
Re: Induction cookers, T Wake, 11:19
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 11:19
Re: Dirac's aether, T Wake, 11:18
Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 11:18
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims,..., T Wake, 11:17
Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, T Wake, 11:17
Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Sam Wormley, 11:15
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 11:15
Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, T Wake, 11:14
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 11:14
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 11:13
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Andy Resnick, 11:04
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 11:01
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Mark Martin, 11:01
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 10:58
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 10:57
Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 10:57
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Attila the Bum, 10:55
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 10:51
Re: Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Jim Black, 10:48
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 10:47
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 10:45
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 10:44
Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Jim Black, 10:41
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 10:41
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 10:38
Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Jim Black, 10:36
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 10:35
Re: neutrino wave question, Mark Martin, 10:34
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 10:30
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 10:23
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 10:23
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 10:20
Re: neutrino wave question, Sam Wormley, 10:19
Re: Smokers are deep thinkers. junkies hane no self_control., T Wake, 10:17
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 10:16
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 10:13
Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Sam Wormley, 10:07
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Mark Martin, 09:58
Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY, Sleepyhead, 09:57
"Examining Mathematical Approaches", Yrots, 09:48
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 09:46
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, Spoonfed, 09:45
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Mark Martin, 09:37
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 09:37
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., michaeld, 09:31
Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Sam Wormley, 09:30
Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, Zigoteau, 09:27
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 09:02
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., PD, 08:59
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 08:58
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 08:56
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., PD, 08:54
Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY, tomcat, 08:53
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 08:51
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 08:49
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 08:46
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 08:42
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 08:41
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., michaeld, 08:36
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, e8xe8, 08:28
Re: GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS, Dr Photon, 08:17
Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks, kasterborus, 08:15
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., michaeld, 08:06
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, bz, 07:56
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Herman Trivilino, 07:51
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Herman Trivilino, 07:41
Re: GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS, donstockbauer, 07:38
GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS, ACE, 07:24
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, J. B. Wood, 07:23
GRAVITY MECHANICS, ACE, 07:23
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, jmfbahciv, 06:55
Re: United Nations moving to China!, jmfbahciv, 06:50
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 06:37
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:33
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 06:29
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 06:21
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Dr Photon, 06:01
Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless, Jan Panteltje, 05:59
Re: Yes, prof. Einstein, acceleration causes 'weight'., Luigi Caselli, 05:54
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 05:26
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 05:26
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Zigoteau, 05:13
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 04:57
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Zigoteau, 04:41
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 04:14
Re: Critical breakthrough, Y.Porat, 04:14
Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Y.Porat, 04:09
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 03:45
Re: Debating Uncertainty uncertainly, Schoenfeld, 03:36
Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand, AlexG, 03:30
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 03:24
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 03:23
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 03:16
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 03:12
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 03:04
Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., mmeron, 03:02
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Androcles, 03:01
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Helmut Wabnig, 02:58
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Androcles, 02:58
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Bilge, 02:57
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, the softrat, 02:48
Re: Mechanical (Probable) Causation Uses Subtraction and Division, Not Addition or Multiplication, OsherD, 02:48
Re: Conservative Scientists, Clave, 02:37
Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics, FrediFizzx, 02:36
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 02:35
Re: Conservative Scientists, Max Masters!!!, 02:35
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 02:34
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 02:33
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Helmut Wabnig, 02:33
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Tim Golden, 02:30
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 02:29
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 02:28
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 02:28
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 02:27
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 02:27
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 02:26
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 02:26
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 02:26
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 02:24
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 02:18
Re: dimension in physics, Tim Golden, 02:11
Re: Conservative Scientists, Clave, 02:08
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 02:07
Re: Mechanical (Probable) Causation Uses Subtraction and Division, Not Addition or Multiplication, OsherD, 02:07
Re: dimension in physics, Tim Golden, 02:02
Re: Conservative Scientists, Al Smith, 02:01
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Androcles, 01:58
Mechanical (Probable) Causation Uses Subtraction and Division, Not Addition or Multiplication, OsherD, 01:57
neutrino wave question, special, 01:53
Light stretch - Hubble's Law, Nick, 01:46
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 01:46
Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, Androcles, 01:41
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, mmeron, 01:38
Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Autymn D. C., 01:32
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 01:30
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, Richard Henry, 01:24
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 01:22
Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, donstockbauer, 01:20
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims,..., tj Frazir, 01:15
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 01:13
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 01:11
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 01:05
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 01:04
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 01:04
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 01:04
Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!, DARTH VADER, 00:59
Re: Induction cookers, tj Frazir, 00:58
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 00:57
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 00:57
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Androcles, 00:56
Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., Androcles, 00:46
Re: Induction cookers, tj Frazir, 00:44
I have again answered Dr. Alan Sokal's challenge ("the Sokal hoax"), musil23, 00:42
Re: Help me with this real life story problem, tdp1001, 00:41
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 00:35
Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 00:31
Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 00:30
(SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 00:30
Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 00:30
Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 00:30
Critical breakthrough, Sam Wormley, 00:29
Re: Critical breakthrough, Y.Porat, 00:27
Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, tj Frazir, 00:20
Re: Induction cookers, tj Frazir, 00:18
Re: All science was once philosophy, m . richardson, 00:18
Re: Induction cookers, tj Frazir, 00:17
Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00

August 25, 2005

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 23:54
Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 23:52
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, tooly, 23:52
Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 23:50
Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, tj Frazir, 23:37
Re: Lookin fer a fizisist, dbohara, 23:36
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 23:33
Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 23:31
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 23:29
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Billy, 23:28
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 23:23
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Paul Stowe, 23:21
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 23:21
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 23:19
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 23:18
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 23:18
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 23:16
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Edward Green, 23:16
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 23:13
Re: Dirac's aether, Nick, 23:13
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 23:12
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, RP, 23:11
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 23:09
Re: Conservative Scientists, caddyshack_al, 23:03
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 23:00
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Gary Childress, 22:56
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 22:55
Lookin fer a fizisist, dbohara, 22:54
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 22:50
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 22:49
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., boo, 22:39
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Billy, 22:39
Re: Earth's inner core is rotating faster by about 0.3 to 0.5 degre..., Mark Martin, 22:36
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Crash, 22:36
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 22:28
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 22:17
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 22:16
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 22:16
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 22:15
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 22:15
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, the softrat, 22:03
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 22:01
Re: Justification of a (flat) space-time metric, Eric Gisse, 22:00
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 21:56
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Edward Green, 21:55
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:55
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:54
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 21:50
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 21:38
Re: [More on: part 3] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., TomGee, 21:38
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 21:36
Re: Debating Uncertainty uncertainly, Jim Black, 21:32
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 21:29
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 21:29
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 21:29
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 21:29
Re: Induction cookers, tdp1001, 21:28
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Ian St. John, 21:23
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Billy, 21:23
Re: Smokers are deep thinkers. junkies hane no self_control., tj Frazir, 20:58
Re: Chirality and isotropy dumbass Unkie Alice, Quantum Mirror, 20:55
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Gary Childress, 20:53
Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, tj Frazir, 20:46
Debating Uncertainty uncertainly, smurrish, 20:36
Re: Earth's inner core is rotating faster by about 0.3 to 0.5 degre..., tj Frazir, 20:35
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 20:34
Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly..., smurrish, 20:26
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Paul Holbach, 20:23
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Quantum Mirror, 20:22
Earth's inner core is rotating faster by about 0.3 to 0.5 degrees per year, Sam Wormley, 20:19
Critical breakthrough, Sam Wormley, 20:17
Re: Chirality and isotropy dumbass Unkie Alice, tj Frazir, 20:13
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 19:55
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 19:54
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Jon Bell, 19:53
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Dik T. Winter, 19:50
Re: material coherence: approximation for large n where n is the number of atoms, tony fleming, 19:45
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 19:40
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:30
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:25
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:23
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:21
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 19:18
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 19:17
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Edward Green, 19:16
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:14
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:14
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:11
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:06
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:05
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:00
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 18:59
Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Androcles, 18:59
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 18:59
Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, Schoenfeld, 18:56
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Androcles, 18:53
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:52
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:51
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Androcles, 18:51
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:50
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:49
Re: Justification of a (flat) space-time metric, Androcles, 18:48
Justification of a (flat) space-time metric, Timo Nieminen, 18:47
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:47
Re: Conservative Scientists, Al Smith, 18:45
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:42
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:41
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 18:38
Re: Conservative Scientists, Al Smith, 18:37
Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, TomGee, 18:37
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, boo, 18:35
Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Uncle Al, 18:33
Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Martin Hogbin, 18:32
Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Uncle Al, 18:32
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 18:29
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 18:29
Re: The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape, Uncle Al, 18:23
Re: INTRUDER ALERT! was Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Ian St. John, 18:22
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, Spoonfed, 18:22
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 18:16
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Robert Kolker, 18:14
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Edward Green, 18:12
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 18:10
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, boo, 18:08
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 18:05
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 18:05
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Ian St. John, 18:04
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 18:02
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 18:01
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 17:52
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, PD, 17:45
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, boo, 17:42
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 17:38
Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Richard Henry, 17:37
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 17:37
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, PD, 17:34
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, markwh04, 17:32
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Ian St. John, 17:32
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 17:30
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:28
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:26
Re: United Nations moving to China!, markwh04, 17:24
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:23
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 17:15
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 17:14
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 17:09
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 17:08
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 17:08
Re: H numbers, Jim Black, 17:02
Re: Help me with this real life story problem, CWatters, 17:01
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Zigoteau, 16:58
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:58
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:54
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:53
Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, Ian Parker, 16:51
Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Randy Poe, 16:48
Re: Help me with this real life story problem, Richard Henry, 16:47
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 16:46
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 16:46
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 16:46
Re: All science was once philosophy, WCB, 16:31
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 16:27
entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?, Evgenij Barsukov, 16:23
Re: NATURE article about dust affecting climate; Aluminum Sequin as Earth Air Conditioner, Roger Coppock, 16:17
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, tadchem, 16:17
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Attila the Bum, 16:08
Help me with this real life story problem, jackjohansson, 16:07
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 16:03
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Ian St. John, 16:02
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, Dr. Zarkov, 15:57
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:56
Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Richard Miller, 15:55
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Mamamia, 15:53
Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 15:48
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Androcles, 15:48
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 15:47
Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless, Androcles, 15:46
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 15:45
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 15:45
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Sam Wormley, 15:44
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 15:43
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, AKA gray asphalt, 15:43
Re: The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape, Douglas Eagleson, 15:42
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Ken Muldrew, 15:42
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Crash, 15:42
Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Richard Miller, 15:41
Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, Eugene Stefanovich, 15:40
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Androcles, 15:40
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Ian St. John, 15:37
Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless, Richard Miller, 15:36
Re: The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape, Richard Henry, 15:32
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 15:29
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 15:27
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, PD, 15:27
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 15:26
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 15:24
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 15:23
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 15:22
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:18
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:17
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 15:14
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Clemens W, 15:13
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 15:10
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 15:08
Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 15:07
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:04
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 15:03
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:02
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 15:01
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Attila the Bum, 15:01
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 15:00
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 14:59
NATURE article about dust affecting climate; Aluminum Sequin as Earth Air Conditioner, a_plutonium, 14:58
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 14:58
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:57
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 14:56
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:51
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 14:49
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Al Smith, 14:47
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., michaeld, 14:46
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Attila the Bum, 14:46
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 14:45
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 14:44
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 14:43
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Androcles, 14:39
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 14:37
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 14:34
Re: Conservative Scientists, Al Smith, 14:30
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 14:26
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 14:22
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 14:21
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Ian St. John, 14:12
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:10
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 14:02
Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 14:00
Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 13:56
Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless, Douglas Eagleson, 13:48
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 13:46
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 13:45
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 13:44
Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 13:42
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Attila the Bum, 13:39
The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape, Douglas Eagleson, 13:37
Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 13:37
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 13:33
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, Randy Poe, 13:31
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 13:28
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 13:28
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, donstockbauer, 13:23
Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:22
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Androcles, 13:19
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 13:17
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Androcles, 13:14
Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 13:13
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, brian a m stuckless, 13:12
Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless, meltedown, 13:11
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 13:07
Re: United Nations moving to China!, dan, 13:07
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 13:07
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 13:06
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 13:02
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Robert Kolker, 13:01
Re: Conservative Scientists, Scratch, 13:00
Re: All science was once philosophy, Robert Kolker, 12:59
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 12:59
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Mitchell Jones, 12:58
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Mark Martin, 12:55
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 12:54
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 12:53
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Dr Photon, 12:52
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 12:50
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, Douglas Eagleson, 12:49
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 12:44
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 12:44
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 12:44
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 12:41
posting 20050825, renjiro_c, 12:41
Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Traveler, 12:41
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 12:40
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Sam Wormley, 12:37
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Chance Hopkins, 12:35
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 12:34
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Richard Henry, 12:34
Re: All science was once philosophy, MobyDikc, 12:31
Re: United Nations moving to China!, dan, 12:28
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Tomas Hokenberi, 12:27
Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Sam Wormley, 12:23
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 12:22
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 12:20
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 12:19
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 12:16
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Schoenfeld, 12:14
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 12:13
Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics, Dr Photon, 12:11
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 12:09
Re: Conservative Scientists, Scratch, 12:06
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 12:05
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Robert Kolker, 12:02
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Orion, 12:01
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Robert Kolker, 12:00
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:58
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 11:57
I have made Einstein's 1925 writings on the Bose-Einstein condensate available as 1 indexed pdf file for download., Jan Panteltje, 11:56
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 11:49
Re: Mach's Principle and Negative Gravity, shevek, 11:44
Re: All science was once philosophy, WCB, 11:37
Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Uncle Al, 11:24
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 11:22
Re: material coherence: approximation for large n where n is the number of atoms, Uncle Al, 11:22
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Uncle Al, 11:14
Re: Induction cookers, Uncle Al, 11:11
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Uncle Al, 11:06
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Uncle Al, 11:03
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, John Sefton, 11:02
Re: All science was once philosophy, Schoenfeld, 11:01
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 11:00
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 10:59
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Androcles, 10:54
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, boo, 10:52
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, boo, 10:50
Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics, Jay R. Yablon, 10:46
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 10:44
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 10:28
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Richard Henry, 10:27
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 10:26
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Randy Poe, 10:16
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 10:14
Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 10:14
Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 10:14
Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 10:14
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 10:11
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 10:08
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Mitchell Holman, 10:08
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, e8xe8, 10:05
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Harry F . Leopold, 10:02
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:01
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 09:57
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 09:53
Re: All science was once philosophy, Codebreaker, 09:53
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, Randy Poe, 09:51
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 09:48
Re: All science was once philosophy, Tron, 09:45
Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, Dr Photon, 09:37
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, Douglas Eagleson, 09:37
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 09:28
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, PD, 09:27
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Tom B. Stone, 09:26
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 09:23
"The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Pup, 09:14
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 09:13
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 09:12
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 08:54
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Sam Wormley, 08:51
Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics, Dr Photon, 08:47
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 08:44
Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY, Sleepyhead, 08:39
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Robert Kolker, 08:37
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 08:36
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, Mark Martin, 08:22
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Robert Kolker, 08:22
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Robert Kolker, 08:21
Re: Gravity Probe B guy promoted to NASA associate administrator, Jan Panteltje, 08:17
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 08:10
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Ph�lt�r, 08:09
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Ph�lt�r, 08:05
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Jan Panteltje, 08:04
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Chuck Feney, 07:58
Re: Entropy question, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:57
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 07:57
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 07:56
Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:50
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 07:49
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, john_ramsden, 07:49
Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe -, T Wake, 07:48
Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:46
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, T Wake, 07:46
Re: Who I'd like to hire to put oars on boats, T Wake, 07:44
Re: United Nations moving to China!, VRWC Destruction Machine, 07:42
Re: All science was once philosophy, Robert Kolker, 07:38
Check out "Weird pictures will fool you" in alt.binaries.pictures.misc, TokaMundo, 07:34
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 07:30
Re: All science was once philosophy, Tron, 07:26
Re: Mach's Principle and Negative Gravity, donstockbauer, 07:25
photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions, tony fleming, 07:22
Mach's Principle and Negative Gravity, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 07:17
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 07:12
Re: The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited....., S. Enterprize Company, 07:11
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 07:10
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 07:00
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 06:59
Re: Worth of a PhD, jmfbahciv, 06:59
Re: Who I'd like to hire, jmfbahciv, 06:55
Re: United Nations moving to China!, jmfbahciv, 06:52
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 06:51
Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, tony fleming, 06:49
Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, tony fleming, 06:49
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:44
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:43
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:39
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 06:32
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:32
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 06:29
Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, jtuzo, 06:25
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 06:20
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 06:03
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, bz, 06:03
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 05:59
COUNT THE STARS CON-TEST EXTENDED -- 2004 Hubble Ultra View - Universe - Space - Galaxies - Evolution or Intelligent Design?, Ed Conrad, 05:59
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 05:54
Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:50
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 05:43
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:42
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:41
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:37
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 05:34
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:30
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:28
Re: United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 05:26
[More on: part 3] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 05:18
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, mmeron, 05:10
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, the softrat, 05:03
Re: United Nations moving to China!, mmeron, 05:03
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 05:00
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 04:55
Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Y.Porat, 04:51
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Lappcatt, 04:50
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Y.Porat, 04:44
material coherence: approximation for large n where n is the number of atoms, tony fleming, 04:43
Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, tony fleming, 04:41
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Chance Hopkins, 04:37
Re: Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Rene Tschaggelar, 04:33
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 04:26
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Martin Hogbin, 04:24
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 04:19
Re: The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited....., S. Enterprize Company, 04:18
Re: The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited....., Y.Porat, 04:14
Re: The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited....., S. Enterprize Company, 04:03
The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited....., S. Enterprize Company, 03:50
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Schoenfeld, 03:43
Is there a difference between a high speed electron and a muon?, Golden Boar, 03:40
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Koobee Wublee, 03:31
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 03:26
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Winston Smith, American Patriot, 03:23
Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, tony fleming, 03:23
Re: United Nations moving to China!, mmeron, 03:16
Re: United Nations moving to China!, <SmirkS>, 03:11
Re: United Nations moving to China!, cLIeNUX user, 03:09
Re: United Nations moving to China!, <SmirkS>, 03:04
Re: United Nations moving to China!, cLIeNUX user, 02:58
Re: United Nations moving to China!, dan, 02:55
Re: All science was once philosophy, WCB, 02:44
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, the softrat, 02:40
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Billy, 02:38
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 02:38
Re: United Nations moving to China!, dan, 02:29
Re: United Nations moving to China!, hanson, 02:29
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 02:28
Re: United Nations moving to China!, dan, 02:27
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 02:17
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., the softrat, 02:14
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Polish Prince \(Szynka\), 02:14
Re: United Nations moving to China!, CWatters, 02:10
Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, mmeron, 02:05
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Nick, 01:57
Re: United Nations moving to China!, Nick, 01:53
Re: What is empty space made of, Nick, 01:49
How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite, the softrat, 01:42
Re: What is empty space made of, tdp1001, 01:39
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 01:38
Re: Lost Causes By King's College's Streater v.s. PI, OsherD, 01:38
Lost Causes By King's College's Streater v.s. PI, OsherD, 01:30
United Nations moving to China!, tdp1001, 01:21
Re: Conservative Scientists, tj Frazir, 01:17
Re: ^ drag force on an object on an automobile, the softrat, 01:14
Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe -, tj Frazir, 01:14
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Schoenfeld, 01:07
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Potte, 01:05
Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, Potte, 01:01
Re: Who I'd like to hire to put oars on boats, tj Frazir, 00:45
Re: Who I'd like to hire to put oars on boats, tj Frazir, 00:45
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, tj Frazir, 00:36
Re: H numbers, tdp1001, 00:27
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, tj Frazir, 00:27
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 00:22
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 00:20
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 00:16
Re: Re: Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 00:13
Induction cookers, tdp1001, 00:04
Re: Yet another entropy paradox..., Autymn D. C., 00:02
Re: Tracking uranium., tj Frazir, 00:01

August 24, 2005

Re: What is empty space made of, tj Frazir, 23:48
H numbers, Akira Bergman, 23:41
Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?, tj Frazir, 23:40
Gravity Probe B guy promoted to NASA associate administrator, Sam Wormley, 23:33
Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, James Copeland, 23:10
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Sam Wormley, 23:08
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Sam Wormley, 22:51
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Sam Wormley, 22:47
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Sam Wormley, 22:40
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Traveler, 22:35
Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, tony fleming, 22:23
New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics, Jay R. Yablon, 22:18
Re: test, John Zinni, 22:16
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, donstockbauer, 22:02
Re: Conservative Scientists, Lobby Dosser, 22:01
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 21:56
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 21:54
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 21:54
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 21:54
Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?, hanson, 21:54
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Nick, 21:51
Re: What is empty space made of, Nick, 21:46
Re: Tracking uranium., James "Kibo" Parry, 21:45
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 21:42
Yet another entropy paradox..., Edward Green, 21:38
Re: Re: Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, James "Kibo" Parry, 21:38
Re: Tracking uranium., tj Frazir, 21:26
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Androcles, 21:21
Traveler - Insane or Genius?, Potte, 21:13
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Michael Gray, 21:08
Re: Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 21:05
SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field', tony fleming, 21:01
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 20:59
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 20:58
Re: Earn 12% daily of your investment!!!, Androcles, 20:52
Re: All science was once philosophy, Tron, 20:52
Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Androcles, 20:49
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Eric Gisse, 20:47
Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity, tj Frazir, 20:47
Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time, Androcles, 20:44
Re: What is empty space made of, TomGee, 20:39
Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, jtuzo, 20:30
Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time, TomGee, 20:27
Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Ken S. Tucker, 20:24
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Craig Franck, 20:13
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, Paul Stowe, 20:08
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 20:07
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Traveler, 20:06
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 20:04
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 20:01
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 19:55
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 19:52
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 19:50
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Potte, 19:47
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 19:47
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Dr. Zarkov, 19:37
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 19:36
Re: Entropy question, Craig Franck, 19:32
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 19:32
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:31
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:29
Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Traveler, 19:27
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:27
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:23
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, bz, 19:21
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:20
Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?, Potte, 19:18
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:17
Re: Re: �� , T Wake, 19:16
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:16
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 19:13
Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Autymn D. C., 19:05
Single Atom Double Slit Experiment, Potte, 19:04
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Sam Wormley, 18:57
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 18:51
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Herman Trivilino, 18:50
Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Timo Nieminen, 18:47
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Edward Green, 18:38
Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 11, Uncle Al, 18:30
Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, Uncle Al, 18:28
Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity, CWatters, 18:22
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 18:11
Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity, Autymn D. C., 18:05
Re: �� , BR, 18:03
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:55
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 11, Douglas Eagleson, 17:52
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 17:49
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 17:47
Re: Entropy question, Edward Green, 17:42
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 17:36
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Mitchell Jones, 17:35
Re: Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, James "Kibo" Parry, 17:29
Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, CWatters, 17:27
Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Androcles, 17:19
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Zigoteau, 17:04
Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 17:01
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Traveler, 17:01
Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement no. 10, Uncle Al, 16:57
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 16:56
Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:40
test, Autymn D. C., 16:40
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 16:38
Re: �� , T Wake, 16:38
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 16:37
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 16:37
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Autymn D. C., 16:36
Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, tj Frazir, 16:35
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 16:34
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 16:33
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:33
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:32
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 16:32
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 16:30
Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 16:29
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 16:29
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 16:29
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, John Kennaugh, 16:27
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 16:24
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 16:24
Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time, TomGee, 16:22
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Dutch, 16:18
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 16:17
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:17
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:17
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:16
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 16:15
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 16:15
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:15
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 16:14
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:14
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement no. 10, Douglas Eagleson, 16:14
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 16:14
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Dutch, 16:13
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:13
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:11
Re: Conservative Scientists, Martin Smith, 16:10
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:08
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:06
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 16:04
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 16:02
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 16:01
Re: curses, Mark Martin, 16:01
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Dr. Zarkov, 15:59
Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Sam Wormley, 15:58
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 15:58
Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, Uncle Al, 15:57
Re: What is empty space made of, Uncle Al, 15:53
Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?, Potte, 15:49
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, mmeron, 15:46
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 15:42
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, e8xe8, 15:37
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, PD, 15:35
Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Uncle Al, 15:33
Re: Police Armor Penetration Loading- I found this, Uncle Al, 15:32
Re: Gravity Probe B, Uncle Al, 15:29
Re: What is empty space made of dark energy at c, T Wake, 15:28
Re: What is empty space made of, footballdvds, 15:26
Re: curses, Mark Martin, 15:20
Re: What is empty space made of dark energy at c, tj Frazir, 15:18
Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, Sam Wormley, 15:17
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:15
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:13
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:11
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:10
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:10
Re: separable Hilbert space, michaeld, 15:09
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Uncle Al, 15:08
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 15:08
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 15:07
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 15:06
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:06
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 15:04
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 15:04
Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 15:03
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 15:03
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Puppet_Sock, 15:02
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Dave Thompson, 15:02
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 15:00
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 14:57
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 14:57
Re: Conservative Scientists, Dave Thompson, 14:56
Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Ken S. Tucker, 14:56
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 14:55
posting 20050824, renjiro_c, 14:55
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 14:54
Re: What is empty space made of, Paul Cardinale, 14:52
Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 14:51
Re: curses, T Wake, 14:47
Re: What is empty space made of, Sam Wormley, 14:46
Re: Proper Time, T Wake, 14:45
Re: �� , T Wake, 14:44
Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, Paul Cardinale, 14:43
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 14:43
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 14:42
Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, Martin, 14:42
Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity, Sam Wormley, 14:41
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 14:41
Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY, tomcat, 14:40
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 14:39
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 14:38
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 14:37
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 14:35
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 14:34
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 14:33
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 14:31
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 14:31
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 14:31
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 14:30
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 14:29
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, PLaToPeS, 14:29
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 14:28
Pressure as a measure of capacity, CWatters, 14:27
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 14:23
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Attila the Bum, 14:19
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, PLaToPeS, 14:17
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 14:15
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 14:14
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 14:11
On light aberration, None, 14:05
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, PLaToPeS, 14:05
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 14:02
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 14:01
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 14:00
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:58
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 13:56
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 13:56
Re: Who I'd like to hire, PD, 13:52
Re: What is empty space made of, Mark Martin, 13:49
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, PD, 13:49
Re: What is empty space made of, Richard Henry, 13:41
Re: The truth is meant to be known, T Wake, 13:36
Re: What is empty space made of, Traveler, 13:36
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, PLaToPeS, 13:30
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 13:28
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 13:28
What is empty space made of, footballdvds, 13:20
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Schoenfeld, 13:16
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, PLaToPeS, 13:11
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 13:09
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 13:02
pressure dependence of thermal conductivity, Max Hofmann, 12:59
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 12:53
Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 12:53
Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 12:49
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 12:48
Re: Chirality and isotropy, hanson, 12:48
Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 12:43
Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 12:33
Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Puppet_Sock, 12:18
Re: GOD=G_uv: A SCIENTIFIC PROPHECY, Sleepyhead, 12:17
curses, kstocklmeir, 12:16
Re: All science was once philosophy, Matthew Lybanon, 12:15
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, stoney, 12:15
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 12:08
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 12:04
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Martin Smith, 12:02
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Mitchell Jones, 11:54
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:53
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:52
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 11:50
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:49
Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Sam Wormley, 11:49
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 11:45
Re: The truth is meant to be known, Lady Chatterly, 11:33
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 11:30
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, 1Z, 11:28
Re: Conservative Scientists, Baxter, 11:26
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 11:24
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bilge, 11:20
"The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Gnak, 11:19
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, 1Z, 11:15
Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, John C . Polasek, 10:58
Re: Proper Time, tj Frazir, 10:52
Re: ^ drag force on an object on an automobile, CWatters, 10:48
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 10:42
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Mitchell Jones, 10:21
From today's (8-24-05) Des Moines Register -- Stick to Science, ISU, Sam Wormley, 10:19
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 10:18
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 10:17
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Don Homuth, 10:08
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 09:51
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 09:48
Re: Proper Time, Puppet_Sock, 09:48
Police Armor Penetration Loading- I found this, Douglas Eagleson, 09:41
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 09:29
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 09:12
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Zigoteau, 09:11
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, nightbat, 09:09
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Robert Kolker, 08:56
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Don Kresch, 08:55
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Don Kresch, 08:55
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Don Kresch, 08:54
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, Robert Kolker, 08:52
Re: Proof for Supremre [sic] Being, human, 08:52
Re: Who I'd like to hire, T Wake, 08:52
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 08:50
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 08:50
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 08:49
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 08:49
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 08:46
Re: �� , T Wake, 08:43
Re: The truth is YOUR ALL ING STUPID, T Wake, 08:42
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 08:33
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, mountain man, 08:33
Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 08:33
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 08:16
Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 08:16
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 08:13
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 08:09
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 08:07
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, Sam Wormley, 08:06
Re: Dirac's aether, Sam Wormley, 08:06
Re: Proper Time, The Ghost In The Machine, 08:00
Re: Gravity Probe B, The Ghost In The Machine, 08:00
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 07:54
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 07:45
Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, Sam Wormley, 07:39
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 07:34
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 07:30
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 07:20
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Pyriform, 07:12
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 07:06
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Y.Porat, 07:05
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 07:00
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 06:52
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Jan Panteltje, 06:52
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, DanielSan, 06:46
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, donstockbauer, 06:45
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 06:34
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Michael Gray, 06:30
Re: Chirality and isotropy, monika hohlmeier, 06:14
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 06:10
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 06:09
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tony fleming, 06:03
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:45
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:41
Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 05:40
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:32
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:28
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 05:22
Re: Who I'd like to hire, jmfbahciv, 05:15
Re: Who I'd like to hire, jmfbahciv, 05:12
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 05:07
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 04:57
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Dutch, 04:50
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Dirk Van de moortel, 04:16
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Schoenfeld, 04:05
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 04:00
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Lobby Dosser, 03:57
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 03:24
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tfleming1, 03:20
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., TomGee, 03:02
Re: All science was once philosophy, mmeron, 02:55
Re: Bohmians/Modified Bohmians Admit rho = /w/^2 Often False, OsherD, 02:49
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Bob Cain, 02:47
Re: Fibres control the speed of light, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:45
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 02:43
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 02:41
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 02:41
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 02:41
Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, mmeron, 02:34
Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, Ken S. Tucker, 02:28
Re: Bohmians/Modified Bohmians Admit rho = /w/^2 Often False, OsherD, 02:10
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Michael Gray, 02:10
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Michael Gray, 02:09
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 02:08
Re: here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Helmut Wabnig, 02:06
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, bz, 02:03
Bohmians/Modified Bohmians Admit rho = /w/^2 Often False, OsherD, 02:03
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 01:56
Re: Chirality and isotropy, Autymn D. C., 01:41
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 01:39
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 01:38
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 01:36
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 01:32
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 01:31
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 01:30
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 01:27
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 01:17
Re: Conservative Scientists, Paul Mitchum, 01:13
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 01:13
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 01:13
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 01:13
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 01:13
Re: All science was once philosophy, Richo, 01:12
Re: Proper Time, Nick, 01:11
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 01:03
Re: All science was once philosophy, Richo, 01:03
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, the softrat, 01:02
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 01:02
Re: Who I'd like to hire, tj Frazir, 01:01
Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Y.Porat, 00:56
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 00:55
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 00:51
Re: All science was once philosophy, mmeron, 00:47
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 00:33
Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values, ectoplasm, 00:33
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 00:33
Calc. angle between two azimuth values, ectoplasm, 00:25
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 00:19
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 00:17
Re: Gravity Probe B, Ken S. Tucker, 00:15
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 00:05
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Mark lman, 00:04
Re: Proper Time, tj Frazir, 00:04
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 00:02

August 23, 2005

Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 23:58
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 23:58
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, astroboy, 23:51
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 23:50
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 23:44
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Max Masters!!!, 23:36
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort, 23:33
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 23:30
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 23:29
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort, 23:28
Re: Proper Time, Nick, 23:27
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 23:20
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 23:16
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 23:14
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 23:14
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 23:10
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 23:05
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 23:04
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 23:04
Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, specifically regarding the postulate of aether, mountain man, 22:59
Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims, mountain man, 22:59
Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 22:59
Re: Dirac and the aether postulate, mountain man, 22:59
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 22:57
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 22:56
Re: I'm an anti_junkie., tj Frazir, 22:56
Re: I'm an anti_junkie., tj Frazir, 22:51
Re: The truth is YOUR ALL ING STUPID, tj Frazir, 22:38
Re: Proper Time, tj Frazir, 22:32
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 22:29
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 22:07
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Richo, 22:00
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 21:55
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 21:51
Re: Chirality and isotropy, mountain man, 21:51
Re: The Mysterious Dark Energy, mountain man, 21:51
Re: experiment with fluids, the softrat, 21:44
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 21:35
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Eric Gisse, 21:32
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Eric Gisse, 21:30
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, John C . Polasek, 21:27
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, chibiabos, 21:24
Re: Proper Time, Sam Wormley, 21:23
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 21:19
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 21:18
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, the softrat, 21:15
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Richo, 21:07
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 21:07
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 21:04
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 21:01
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 20:56
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Don Kresch, 20:55
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Don Homuth, 20:50
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Martin, 20:49
Re: ^ drag force on an object on an automobile, Timo Nieminen, 20:48
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 20:42
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 20:41
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Baxter, 20:39
Chirality and isotropy, Edward Green, 20:37
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 20:34
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 20:30
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 20:29
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tfleming1, 20:27
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 20:24
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington,DC, Uncle Al, 20:22
Re: All science was once philosophy, Uncle Al, 20:21
Re: Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?, Uncle Al, 20:19
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 20:16
Re: Entropy question, Edward Green, 20:12
Re: Entropy question, Craig Franck, 20:12
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 20:10
Re: Who I'd like to hire, Math Freak, 20:09
Re: experiment with fluids, Uncle Al, 20:08
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 20:07
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 20:06
Re: Conservative Scientists, Don Homuth, 20:06
posting 20050823, renjiro_c, 20:01
^ drag force on an object on an automobile, aguy, 20:00
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 19:55
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:53
Re: Entropy question, Craig Franck, 19:52
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 19:52
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 19:49
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 19:48
Re: experiment with fluids, Steven Gray, 19:46
Re: Proper Time, Jim Black, 19:42
Re: Entropy question, Edward Green, 19:42
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 19:42
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Sam Wormley, 19:42
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 19:41
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 19:40
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tfleming1, 19:37
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 19:36
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 19:34
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 19:34
Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 8, Douglas Eagleson, 19:32
Re: The moment is all anyone ever had., T Wake, 19:23
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 19:23
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:22
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington,DC, Robert Kolker, 19:20
Re: All science was once philosophy, Robert Kolker, 19:18
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 19:17
Re: Dirac's aether, Paul Stowe, 19:17
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, tfleming1, 19:13
Re: Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?, TokaMundo, 19:09
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:09
Re: �� , T Wake, 19:07
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 19:07
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 19:06
Re: The moment is all anyone ever had., tj Frazir, 19:03
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 19:02
Re: The truth is YOUR ALL ING STUPID, TokaMundo, 18:59
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 18:59
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 18:58
Re: Lens Fabrication, Llanzlan Klazmon, 18:54
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 18:54
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 18:52
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, mimus, 18:49
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 18:49
Re: Gravity Probe B, Uncle Al, 18:47
Re: Proper Time, T Wake, 18:47
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:47
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 18:43
Re: Gravity Probe B, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 18:42
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:41
experiment with fluids, Tony Johansson, 18:40
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 18:38
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 18:36
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 18:34
Re: All science was once philosophy, Brian Fletcher, 18:32
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 18:25
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Jim Spriggs, 18:19
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 18:18
Gravity Probe B, Llanzlan Klazmon, 18:17
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, e8xe8, 18:17
Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, Minus XVII, 18:16
Proper Time, Nick, 18:15
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Ian St. John, 18:09
Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe -, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:06
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Attila the Bum, 18:05
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Mark Martin, 18:05
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 18:02
Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses, Sam Wormley, 17:54
Re: Lens Fabrication, James Copeland, 17:53
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Max Masters!!!, 17:48
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 17:44
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 17:42
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Max Masters!!!, 17:42
Shadow Universe Trespasses, e8xe8, 17:36
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Max Masters!!!, 17:29
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Randy Poe, 17:25
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 17:24
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, tomcat, 17:20
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Uncle Al, 17:18
Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 8, Uncle Al, 17:18
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington,DC, Uncle Al, 17:13
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 17:13
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 17:13
Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 7, Uncle Al, 17:12
Re: Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?, Uncle Al, 17:08
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 17:05
Re: All science was once philosophy, maff, 17:00
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 16:57
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Androcles, 16:56
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:51
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 16:49
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 16:49
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 16:46
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, WCB, 16:42
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 16:41
Re: Lens Fabrication, Sam Wormley, 16:40
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 16:39
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Androcles, 16:38
Re: Who I'd like to hire, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:37
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, donstockbauer, 16:34
Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Uncle Al, 16:31
Re: Lens Fabrication, Uncle Al, 16:29
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, BuddhaThu, 16:29
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Jim Black, 16:29
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Ian St. John, 16:26
Re: Who I'd like to hire, T Wake, 16:26
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Bob Cain, 16:22
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Clemens W, 16:19
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 16:16
Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 16:13
Who I'd like to hire, dbohara, 16:11
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, C6L1V, 16:09
Re: All science was once philosophy, Uncle Al, 16:06
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Sam Wormley, 16:06
Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 16:00
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 15:57
Re: Need help on "Basic" concept, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:55
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 15:53
Re: Why can't this be done?, mike3, 15:52
Need help on "Basic" concept, astroboy, 15:45
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 15:44
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Eugene Stefanovich, 15:39
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 15:32
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 15:29
Re: Worth of a PhD, PD, 15:28
Re: More on ether, Re: Discussions on relativity., Sam Wormley, 15:27
Re: Conservative Scientists, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 15:23
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 8, Douglas Eagleson, 15:07
Re: LIGO is coming into operation in stages, Sam Wormley, 15:02
Re: LIGO is coming into operation in stages, Ken S. Tucker, 14:53
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 14:51
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 14:51
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 14:48
here is THE answer Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Evgenij Barsukov, 14:38
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 14:37
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, John Smith, 14:34
Fibres control the speed of light, Sam Wormley, 14:31
Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Autymn D. C., 14:30
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:14
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 14:07
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 13:47
Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?, Immortalist, 13:38
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Robert Kolker, 13:35
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 13:27
Re: A true sequence of events?, Androcles, 13:26
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 13:24
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 13:24
Re: Worth of a PhD, carlip-nospam, 13:23
Re: LIGO is coming into operation in stages, Sam Wormley, 13:22
Re: LIGO is coming into operation in stages, Ken S. Tucker, 13:20
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 13:11
Re: Isaac Newton, Immortalist, 13:11
Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 13:07
LIGO is coming into operation in stages, Sam Wormley, 13:02
Re: The Republican War Against Science (A New Book), Robert Kolker, 13:01
Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 13:01
Re: A true sequence of events?, Igor, 12:56
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Robert Kolker, 12:55
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Robert Kolker, 12:54
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 12:54
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 12:52
Re: All science was once philosophy, Robert Kolker, 12:52
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 12:50
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 12:47
Re: Conservative Scientists, T Wake, 12:47
Re: All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 12:44
Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 7, Douglas Eagleson, 12:43
Re: Another Vietnam/Iraq Parallel (GOP, The Party of Treason), T Wake, 12:43
Re: �� , T Wake, 12:41
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bruce Scott TOK, 12:38
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 12:37
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 12:30
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation'), 12:14
Re: What are these symbols in this formula?, yotango, 12:10
Re: The moment is all anyone ever had., Mark Martin, 12:08
Re: Another Vietnam/Iraq Parallel (GOP, The Party of Treason), tj Frazir, 12:07
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Freshwater Spaceman, 11:59
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 11:57
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Traveler, 11:39
Re: Worth of a PhD, Schoenfeld, 11:34
Re: Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?, James Copeland, 11:29
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Schoenfeld, 11:27
Re: The moment is all anyone ever had., tj Frazir, 11:27
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Schoenfeld, 11:26
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 11:23
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 11:19
Re: Thanks was Re: Noble gasses in windows, tj Frazir, 11:15
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 11:01
Re: Lens Fabrication, Sam Wormley, 11:01
Re: Dirac's aether, tj Frazir, 10:53
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 10:50
Re: All science was once philosophy, Schoenfeld, 10:43
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Dave, 10:42
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Y.Porat, 10:38
Re: Dirac's aether, tj Frazir, 10:37
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 10:37
Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 7, Androcles, 10:35
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Schoenfeld, 10:32
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 7, Douglas Eagleson, 10:31
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Schoenfeld, 10:31
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Traveler, 10:29
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, schoenfeld1, 10:22
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 10:21
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Schoenfeld, 10:18
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 10:16
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:15
Re: All science was once philosophy, PerfectlyAble, 10:09
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Gregory L. Hansen, 10:05
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 10:02
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 10:01
Re: Isaac Newton, zzbunker, 09:56
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Jim07D5, 09:38
Re: [More on: part 2] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Greysky, 09:36
Re: Dirac's aether, Sam Wormley, 09:31
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, David Thomson, 09:30
Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Sam Wormley, 09:25
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 09:25
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Greysky, 09:23
Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?, kasterborus, 09:23
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 09:19
"The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Sserdda, 09:17
Re: Dirac's aether, Sam Wormley, 09:10
Thanks was Re: Noble gasses in windows, newsgroups.comcast.net, 09:09
Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 09:00
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 08:58
Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 08:52
Re: Dirac's aether, Paul Stowe, 08:52
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Pyriform, 08:38
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Schoenfeld, 08:36
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Schoenfeld, 08:29
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, T Wake, 08:09
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 08:07
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 08:06
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 08:04
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, T Wake, 08:03
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 07:53
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, bz, 07:51
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 07:09
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, donstockbauer, 07:09
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, donstockbauer, 07:07
Re: Lens Fabrication, donstockbauer, 06:58
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:55
Lens Fabrication, Camilo, 06:49
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Michael Gray, 06:31
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Schoenfeld, 06:31
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, feuerbac, 06:27
Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Richard Herring, 06:24
Re: Worth of a PhD, jmfbahciv, 06:16
Re: Thermal Inductance, AJW, 06:15
Isaac Newton, maff, 06:11
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 06:06
Re: Dirac's aether, jmfbahciv, 05:59
Re: some representation theory questions, m1ngleg02, 05:36
Re: [More on: part 2] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:28
[More on: part 2] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 04:57
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, flames, 04:39
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 04:16
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 04:04
Re: why can't fields be quantized too?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 03:59
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, tadchem, 03:50
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Paul Mitchum, 03:37
Re: Noble gasses in windows, the softrat, 03:22
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, the softrat, 03:20
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Eric Gisse, 03:15
Re: ozone formation, Zdenek Sperling, 03:14
Re: Another Vietnam/Iraq Parallel (GOP, The Party of Treason), T Wake, 03:12
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Androcles, 02:56
Re: Thermal Inductance, s.morra, 02:46
Re: What are these symbols in this formula?, yotango, 02:45
Re: A true sequence of events?, Androcles, 02:22
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 02:18
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 02:17
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, George, 02:15
Re: �� , T Wake, 02:06
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 01:55
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, OM, 01:43
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, OM, 01:42
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, OM, 01:41
Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, a_plutonium, 01:29
Re: Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity, John Sefton, 01:27
Re: Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Y.Porat, 01:21
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 01:14
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 01:12
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 01:07
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Robert Karl Stonjek, 00:56
Re: The truth is meant to be known, Lady Chatterly, 00:49
Re: Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity, Schoenfeld, 00:48
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 00:42
Re: The truth is meant to be known, Nick, 00:41
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Nick, 00:40
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 00:33
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 00:27
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Nick, 00:26
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 00:18
Re: Another Vietnam/Iraq Parallel (GOP, The Party of Treason), tj Frazir, 00:17
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Freshwater Spaceman, 00:15

August 22, 2005

Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, Minus XVII, 23:58
Re: The truth is YOUR ALL ING STUPID, tj Frazir, 23:54
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Jon Slaughter, 23:43
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 23:34
Re: Noble gasses in windows, tj Frazir, 23:11
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Brad Guth, 23:11
Re: separable Hilbert space, Nick, 23:03
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 22:56
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Clemens W, 22:55
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Eric Gisse, 22:52
why can't fields be quantized too?, flames, 22:36
Re: Noble gasses in windows, jimp, 22:35
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 22:34
Re: Noble gasses in windows, Llanzlan Klazmon, 22:29
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, jimp, 22:25
Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Schoenfeld, 22:21
Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Bilge, 22:19
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 22:17
Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools, Clave, 22:14
Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Gary Sokolich, 22:09
Re: Noble gasses in windows, Sam Wormley, 22:08
Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, jimp, 22:07
Re: Noble gasses in windows, Sam Wormley, 22:07
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 22:05
Re: Noble gasses in windows, Sam Wormley, 22:04
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 21:57
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Spoonfed, 21:53
Re: Entropy question, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com, 21:48
Re: All science was once philosophy, Matt Silberstein, 21:44
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, TokaMundo, 21:41
Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Schoenfeld, 21:39
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 21:33
Re: separable Hilbert space, David Macmanus, 21:29
Noble gasses in windows, newsgroups.comcast.net, 21:28
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, tj Frazir, 21:17
Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Paul Cardinale, 21:16
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 21:00
Re: Allais effect and 1999's tests update, mountain man, 20:53
Re: All science was once philosophy, mountain man, 20:53
Re: All science was once philosophy, mountain man, 20:53
Re: All science was once philosophy, Nick, 20:47
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Pyriform, 20:46
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 20:44
Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?, Don1, 20:43
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 20:18
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Bob Cain, 20:10
Re: Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity, mountain man, 20:06
Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, donstockbauer, 20:03
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 20:00
Re: Entropy question, Craig Franck, 19:57
Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Autymn D. C., 19:53
Re: Nuclear transformation energy, Autymn D. C., 19:52
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 19:44
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Llanzlan Klazmon, 19:43
Re: separable Hilbert space, michaeld, 19:39
Re: All science was once philosophy, Roger, 19:39
Re: All science was once philosophy, Edward Green, 19:34
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, T Wake, 19:05
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, T Wake, 19:03
Re: Entropy question, mmeron, 19:03
Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg 4: The "Generalized HUP", OsherD, 19:01
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Twittering One, 18:58
Re: separable Hilbert space, Edward Green, 18:55
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Pyriform, 18:47
Re: separable Hilbert space, Edward Green, 18:37
Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Eugene Stefanovich, 18:24
Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg 4: The "Generalized HUP", OsherD, 18:23
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Brad Guth, 18:18
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Nick, 18:16
Reason for high presssure in air liquifier, Jeremy Samuels, 18:03
Re: All science was once philosophy, Joseki, 18:01
Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg 4: The "Generalized HUP", OsherD, 18:01
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Brad Guth, 17:57
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, markwh04, 17:46
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., kurdayon, 17:46
Re: Thermal physics - bizarre question of the day., Uncle Al, 17:41
Re: Entropy question, T Wake, 17:35
Re: Worth of a PhD, Uncle Al, 17:34
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, T Wake, 17:34
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., kurdayon, 17:29
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Brad Guth, 17:28
Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 17:27
Re: All science was once philosophy, Jim07D5, 17:24
Re: All science was once philosophy, Uncle Al, 17:23
Re: Entropy question, donstockbauer, 17:22
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 17:18
Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective., Jan Panteltje, 17:15
Re: All science was once philosophy, Witziges R�tsel, 17:14
Re: All science was once philosophy, mimus, 17:09
Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 17:06
Re: All science was once philosophy, donstockbauer, 17:03
Re: All science was once philosophy, Jim07D5, 16:54
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 16:41
Re: Three phases of acceleration, tadchem, 16:41
Re: A true sequence of events?, Igor, 16:40
Re: Polly wants a cracker., Zigoteau, 16:36
Re: Worth of a PhD, Rene Tschaggelar, 16:36
Re: All science was once philosophy, BuddhaThu, 16:35
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 16:26
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Zigoteau, 16:17
Re: Worth of a PhD, Androcles, 16:14
Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 16:11
Re: Allais effect and 1999's tests update, Douglas Eagleson, 16:01
Re: Allais effect and 1999's tests update, Douglas Eagleson, 15:58
Re: All science was once philosophy, BuddhaThu, 15:55
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., kurdayon, 15:48
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Androcles, 15:48
Re: Worth of a PhD, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:46
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Gregory L. Hansen, 15:45
Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?, Timo Nieminen, 15:41
Re: Worth of a PhD, Randy Poe, 15:39
Thermal physics - bizarre question of the day., paul, 15:37
Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 15:34
Re: Why can't this be done?, T Wake, 15:34
Worth of a PhD, dbohara, 15:31
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, RP, 15:26
Q on iron and other nuclei (Re: Why can't this be done?), Autymn D. C., 15:26
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Zigoteau, 15:22
Re: All science was once philosophy, Matt Silberstein, 15:21
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, PLaToPeS, 15:16
Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, Autymn D. C., 15:08
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, PLaToPeS, 15:03
Re: Two mirrors facing each other, Autymn D. C., 15:03
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 15:02
Re: All science was once philosophy, WCB, 14:56
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 14:51
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Autymn D. C., 14:49
Re: All science was once philosophy, Seeker is my , 14:48
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Publius, 14:42
Re: All science was once philosophy, Jim07D5, 14:28
Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark, Autymn D. C., 14:28
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 14:12
Re: quantum spaces, michaeld, 14:08
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 14:07
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Don1, 14:00
Re: Microscopic reversibility, Ken Muldrew, 13:56
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 13:55
Re: Entropy question, carlip-nospam, 13:54
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Don1, 13:51
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 13:51
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 13:50
Re: All science was once philosophy, unrestrained_hand, 13:48
Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, a_plutonium, 13:41
Re: All science was once philosophy, Uncle Al, 13:37
Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:33
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Autymn D. C., 13:29
Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Androcles, 13:26
Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Helmut Wabnig, 13:18
Re: separable Hilbert space, David Macmanus, 13:08
Re: some representation theory questions, Puppet_Sock, 13:03
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 13:00
All science was once philosophy, Immortalist, 12:57
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 12:54
Re: some representation theory questions, m1ngleg02, 12:53
Re: separable Hilbert space, Schoenfeld, 12:49
Re: some representation theory questions, Schoenfeld, 12:47
Re: some representation theory questions, m1ngleg02, 12:44
Re: Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity, Schoenfeld, 12:43
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, TomGee, 12:42
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 12:38
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Schoenfeld, 12:34
Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", donstockbauer, 12:33
Re: A true sequence of events?, dirkbontes, 12:32
Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Traveler, 12:30
Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., PD, 12:28
Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, PD, 12:25
Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity, d_hainz, 12:20
Re: separable Hilbert space, michaeld, 12:15
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Tim Golden, 12:11
Re: A true sequence of events?, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:08
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, tj Frazir, 12:05
Re: separable Hilbert space, michaeld, 12:00
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Don1, 11:46
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Puppet_Sock, 11:42
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., kurdayon, 11:38
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., kurdayon, 11:25
Re: A true sequence of events?, Sam Wormley, 11:21
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 11:14
Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Sam Wormley, 11:13
Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Uncle Al, 11:12
Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., Uncle Al, 11:10
Re: ozone formation, Uncle Al, 11:09
60 GB IPOD deal found, acquient, 11:06
Re: A true sequence of events?, Jan Panteltje, 10:56
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 10:51
Re: Nuclear transformation energy, Y.Porat, 10:51
"How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Rettel, 10:48
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, John Sefton, 10:43
Re: Nuclear transformation energy, Puppet_Sock, 10:41
Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with 10,000 TV antennas, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 10:41
How fast does conventional wisdom say electrons radiate?, John Sefton, 10:31
Re: Gravity travels at 33.33 repeat lightspeed., John Sefton, 10:30
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 10:26
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Puppet_Sock, 10:24
Re: Gravity travels at 33.33 repeat lightspeed., John Sefton, 10:19
Re: A true sequence of events?, Sam Wormley, 10:15
Re: Article: Dwarf galaxy lights up dark matter debate, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 10:14
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 10:14
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Don Kresch, 09:53
Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Richard Herring, 09:34
Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 09:30
Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?, Andy Resnick, 09:24
Re: Gibbs Rant-a-dox, Andy Resnick, 09:14
Re: Entropy question, Andy Resnick, 09:12
Re: Polly wants a cracker., Jan Panteltje, 09:11
Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Jan Panteltje, 09:11
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Jim07D5, 09:03
Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Schoenfeld, 09:01
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 08:56
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Andy Resnick, 08:50
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, T Wake, 08:40
Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., Sam Wormley, 08:34
Re: Deviation of light by Sun is optical, Bilge, 08:29
Re: Gravity travels at 33.33 repeat lightspeed., Schoenfeld, 08:29
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Andy Resnick, 08:27
Re: Gravity travels at 33.33 repeat lightspeed., mountain man, 08:22
Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 08:15
Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., Schoenfeld, 08:12
Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., Schoenfeld, 08:11
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Schoenfeld, 08:07
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, Michael Gray, 07:54
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, donstockbauer, 07:53
Re: Proof for Supremre Being, donstockbauer, 07:46
Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., mountain man, 07:37
Proof for Supremre Being, Freshwater Spaceman, 07:26
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Bruce Scott TOK, 07:25
Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 07:25
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 07:00
Re: Dirac's aether, jmfbahciv, 06:49
Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 06:48
Re: A true sequence of events?, dirkbontes, 06:47
Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 06:41
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 06:36
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Peter Kinane, 06:24
A true sequence of events?, Jan Panteltje, 05:42
Re: Two mirrors facing each other, tdp1001, 05:42
Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Graham J Lee, 05:41
EC-funded Research Visits: Application Deadline 31/08/2005, europa, 05:29
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, RP, 05:08
Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic., kurdayon, 04:38
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, August 22, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 04:34
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 04:15
Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers, OsherD, 04:09
Re: Why can't this be done?, mmeron, 04:04
Re: The truth is meant to be known, DanielSan, 03:56
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Bob Cain, 03:37
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Bob Cain, 03:33
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 03:31
Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers, OsherD, 03:25
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, blart, 03:17
Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers, OsherD, 02:48
Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers, OsherD, 02:43
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 02:41
Re: Why can't this be done?, mike3, 02:35
Re: Louis Savain "Traveler" use this improvement, hanson, 02:31
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 02:31
Nuclear transformation energy, mike3, 02:30
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 01:55
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Y.Porat, 01:45
Re: Why can't this be done?, macromitch, 01:24
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 01:21
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, TomGee, 01:20
Re: Louis Savain "Traveler" use this improvement, TokaMundo, 01:03
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 01:01
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, TokaMundo, 00:49
Re: Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory 2: Remedies, OsherD, 00:48
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, TokaMundo, 00:47
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, TokaMundo, 00:45
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, TokaMundo, 00:41
Re: Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory 2: Remedies, OsherD, 00:37
Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory 2: Remedies, OsherD, 00:15
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tdp1001, 00:00

August 21, 2005

Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., Sam Wormley, 23:59
Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Sam Wormley, 23:57
Re: Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether, macromitch, 23:52
Re: Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory, OsherD, 23:51
Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed., John Sefton, 23:47
Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, John Sefton, 23:46
Re: The truth is meant to be known, macromitch, 23:39
ozone formation, Zdenek Sperling, 23:33
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 23:33
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 23:30
Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory, OsherD, 23:30
Re: The truth is meant to be known, Dave, 23:30
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, tj Frazir, 23:19
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, tj Frazir, 23:11
Re: Why can't this be done?, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 22:53
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 22:40
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, Mark Martin, 22:38
Re: Why can't this be done?, Mike, 22:17
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Bob Cain, 21:38
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Don1, 21:27
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Nick, 21:17
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Sam Wormley, 21:12
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Sam Wormley, 21:09
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Odysseus, 21:03
Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) 2: 2003 Paper, OsherD, 21:02
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 20:49
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Odysseus, 20:41
Re: Why can't this be done?, mike3, 20:37
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Brad Guth, 20:36
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Brad Guth, 20:29
Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) 2: 2003 Paper, OsherD, 20:29
Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Androcles, 20:23
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 20:21
Re: Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether, Androcles, 20:19
Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó, tj Frazir, 20:13
Re: The Ethical War Against Stem Cells, Mark Martin, 20:07
Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Mark Martin, 20:04
Re: Why can't this be done?, The Ghost In The Machine, 20:00
Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 19:59
Re: Dirac's aether, mountain man, 19:59
Re: Inertia: the measure of energy in a body, tj Frazir, 19:58
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 19:49
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, TomGee, 19:48
Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Sam Wormley, 19:42
Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Graham J Lee, 19:40
The Ethical War Against Stem Cells, Nick, 19:38
Re: separable Hilbert space, Edward Green, 19:36
Re: quantum spaces, Edward Green, 19:31
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 19:30
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Llanzlan Klazmon, 19:19
Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Uncle Al, 19:19
Re: Original Einstein manuscript from 1924 surfaces: "Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases -- Zweite Abhandlung", and more on the US PhD, James Copeland, 19:19
Re: quantum spaces, David Macmanus, 19:17
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, Brad Guth, 19:16
Re: Why can't this be done?, Uncle Al, 19:15
Re: The Republican War Against Science (A New Book), Uncle Al, 19:14
Re: quantum spaces, Edward Green, 19:13
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Steve Ralph, 19:13
Re: "The Paradox of Zeno", Uncle Al, 19:11
Re: Why can't this be done?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 19:10
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 19:04
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Sam Wormley, 18:53
Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Androcles, 18:46
Re: Time energy uncertainty, ytyourclothes, 18:45
Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Androcles, 18:43
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 18:32
Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Androcles, 18:28
Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, Sam Wormley, 18:25
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, tj Frazir, 18:17
A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond, rfraning, 18:15
Re: Louis Savain "Traveler" use this improvement, Traveler, 18:13
Re: quantum spaces, michaeld, 18:12
Re: separable Hilbert space, David Macmanus, 18:06
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, tj Frazir, 18:03
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 18:01
Re: separable Hilbert space, michaeld, 17:59
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, tj Frazir, 17:59
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Sam Wormley, 17:51
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, tj Frazir, 17:49
Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark, Greysky, 17:46
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 17:46
separable Hilbert space, David Macmanus, 17:38
Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Quantum Mirror, 17:32
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 17:28
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 17:27
Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP), OsherD, 17:23
quantum spaces, David Macmanus, 17:20
Why can't this be done?, mike3, 17:05
Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Jan Panteltje, 16:46
Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Jan Panteltje, 16:46
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Bob Cain, 16:29
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, William Hughes, 15:57
Re: Space time ??, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:52
Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, Autymn D. C., 15:51
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Bob Cain, 15:40
Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, Autymn D. C., 15:40
Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Androcles, 15:38
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Autymn D. C., 15:28
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 15:23
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 15:20
Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Androcles, 15:18
Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Sam Wormley, 15:17
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Uncle Al, 15:13
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 15:11
Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, Autymn D. C., 15:06
Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Quantum Mirror, 14:56
Re: test, donstockbauer, 14:54
Re: Two mirrors facing each other, Autymn D. C., 14:54
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, OM, 14:53
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Autymn D. C., 14:45
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, T Wake, 14:27
test, donstockbauer, 14:23
Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, donstockbauer, 14:21
Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Autymn D. C., 14:20
This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?, Jan Panteltje, 14:20
Re: Time energy uncertainty, Autymn D. C., 14:18
TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly, OM, 14:17
Re: Did The Big Bang Really Happen? YES!, T Wake, 14:13
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Autymn D. C., 14:13
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 14:07
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, nightbat, 14:06
The Republican War Against Science (A New Book), W. Watson, 13:53
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Zigoteau, 13:38
Re: "The Paradox of Zeno", Sam Wormley, 13:37
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Autymn D. C., 13:36
Re: Space time ??, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 13:34
Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 13:23
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 13:06
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 13:01
Re: Did The Big Bang Really Happen? YES!, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 13:01
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 12:57
Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark, Autymn D. C., 12:57
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Y.Porat, 12:25
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Pyriform, 11:47
Re: proton-proton coulomb repulsion inquiry, tdp1001, 11:32
Re: Electron tunneling??, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:25
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Bruce Scott TOK, 11:20
Re: Louis Savain "Traveler" use this improvement, Schoenfeld, 11:15
Original Einstein manuscript from 1924 surfaces: "Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases -- Zweite Abhandlung", and more on the US PhD, Jan Panteltje, 11:13
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", TokaMundo, 11:11
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Zigoteau, 11:07
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 11:04
"The Paradox of Zeno", Http, 11:01
"The Paradox of Zeno", Http, 11:01
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 11:00
Louis Savain "Traveler" use this improvement, hanson, 10:53
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 10:53
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 10:53
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 10:53
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 10:53
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 10:53
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Schoenfeld, 10:41
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, T Wake, 10:39
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 10:04
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 10:03
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 09:35
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 09:28
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Y.Porat, 09:17
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, donstockbauer, 09:00
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, donstockbauer, 08:59
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", donstockbauer, 08:58
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", donstockbauer, 08:56
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Zigoteau, 08:55
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Steve Ralph, 08:47
Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Jim Black, 08:40
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Don1, 08:35
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, donstockbauer, 08:34
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Jim Black, 08:19
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 08:14
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Sam Wormley, 08:10
Re: Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Schoenfeld, 08:01
Inertia: the measure of matter in a body, Don1, 07:50
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 06:46
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, nightbat, 06:41
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, jmfbahciv, 06:14
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Y.Porat, 06:11
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, T Wake, 05:35
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, T Wake, 05:29
Re: Variance of Quantum Operators is Incorrectly Defined, OsherD, 04:24
Can Photon have an Internal Structure??, Kyle, 04:08
Re: Variance of Quantum Operators is Incorrectly Defined, OsherD, 04:06
Re: Variance of Quantum Operators is Incorrectly Defined, OsherD, 03:10
Variance of Quantum Operators is Incorrectly Defined, OsherD, 02:52
Re: want to buy science-fair accelerator, dances_with_barkadas, 02:45
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, John Sefton, 01:21
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 01:19
Re: Get A Desktop PC For FREE!! - Completely Legit!!, NightsoilDalits@RyugyongHotel, 00:35

August 20, 2005

Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 23:54
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 23:22
Re: Two mirrors facing each other, tdp1001, 22:51
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", tj Frazir, 22:35
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 22:23
Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark, Greysky, 22:20
Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Bob Cain, 22:17
Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, Autymn D. C., 22:14
Re: Time energy uncertainty, the softrat, 22:13
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Nick, 22:08
Re: Nuclear Secrets, the softrat, 22:05
Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, Mike, 22:05
Re: lenses, the softrat, 21:59
Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Nick, 21:58
Re: Help with science for novel., donstockbauer, 21:58
Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, the softrat, 21:49
Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Bob Cain, 21:48
Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Gary Sokolich, 21:38
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Autymn D. C., 21:32
Re: please help me to get a AIP conference paper, thanks., Sam Wormley, 21:16
Re: Help with science for novel., Ian Stirling, 21:14
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 20:29
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Raving Loonie, 20:07
Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, Minus XVII, 19:57
Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, Math Freak, 19:56
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 19:37
Re: proton-proton coulomb repulsion inquiry, FrediFizzx, 19:37
Re: pressurized airplane cabins, jimp, 19:29
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 19:28
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 19:24
Re: Help with science for novel., AJW, 19:19
Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, Mike, 19:19
Re: Help with science for novel., AJW, 19:14
Re: problem, Autymn D. C., 19:14
Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, David, 19:11
Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, Sam Wormley, 19:04
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Pyriform, 19:03
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Autymn D. C., 19:02
proton-proton coulomb repulsion inquiry, Kyle, 19:02
Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark, Autymn D. C., 19:00
Re: pressurized airplane cabins, Sam Wormley, 18:58
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Sam Wormley, 18:55
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 18:48
Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, Mike, 18:42
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, john_ramsden, 18:36
Re: pressurized airplane cabins, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:34
Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, donstockbauer, 18:28
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 18:27
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Androcles, 18:27
Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, David, 18:26
please help me to get a AIP conference paper, thanks., Zhen Song, 18:26
Re: Help with science for novel., jimp, 18:24
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 18:23
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 18:22
Re: fastest way to stir sugar into coffee/tea?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:21
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, donstockbauer, 18:21
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 18:21
Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, Mike, 18:20
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 18:17
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Uncle Al, 18:13
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:12
Re: lenses, Uncle Al, 18:11
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 18:08
Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:00
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, Autymn D. C., 17:59
Re: Electron tunneling??, Mark Martin, 17:58
Re: lenses, Richard Tobin, 17:56
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Uncle Al, 17:56
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, CSCP, 17:52
Re: OK, this is it, Laurent, 17:47
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 17:46
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 17:43
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Traveler, 17:42
Get A Desktop PC For FREE!! - Completely Legit!!, bryandrinks, 17:40
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, TokaMundo, 17:39
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, john_ramsden, 17:38
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, TokaMundo, 17:38
Re: lenses, CWatters, 17:37
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 17:36
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Uncle Al, 17:34
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 17:33
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, TokaMundo, 17:30
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, T Wake, 17:27
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity---The nightbat " Black Comet ", T Wake, 17:22
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 17:19
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, PD, 17:14
Re: Help with science for novel., john_ramsden, 17:11
Re: Electron tunneling??, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:11
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Helmut Wabnig, 17:10
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 17:08
Re: Nuclear Secrets, Math Freak, 17:05
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Raving Loonie, 17:02
Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Edward Green, 16:59
Re: Help with science for novel., pete, 16:49
Re: Symmetric language, donstockbauer, 16:46
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Edward Green, 16:44
Re: Symmetric language, Math Freak, 16:34
Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time, tj Frazir, 16:32
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity---The nightbat " Black Comet ", Dr. Flonkenstein, 16:29
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, donstockbauer, 16:29
Re: OK, this is it, Hatunen, 16:11
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 16:10
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Odysseus, 16:07
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 15:56
Re: lenses, Sam Wormley, 15:43
Re: Evidence for the Existence of God, paranormal, 15:42
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Double-A, 15:36
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity---The nightbat " Black Comet ", tadchem, 15:26
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Sam Wormley, 15:22
Evidence for the Existence of God, David Thomson, 15:16
Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks, markwh04, 15:13
Re: Help with science for novel., John Sefton, 15:10
Re: Symmetric language, Ken S. Tucker, 15:01
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Sam Wormley, 14:56
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 14:49
Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Sam Wormley, 14:47
Re: lenses, Charles, 14:44
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Greysky, 14:39
Re: Experimental verification of the Casimir attractive force (Lamoreaux), Mike, 14:27
Re: Space time ??, markwh04, 14:22
Re: lenses, Androcles, 14:14
A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Smc, 14:06
lenses, Joe Drake, 14:02
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:47
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Sam Wormley, 13:43
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 13:21
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 13:17
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 13:16
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 13:12
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:07
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 13:00
NOMINATION: "Cinquirer" for Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, Jim Black, 12:56
Re: Help with science for novel., Gregory L. Hansen, 12:54
Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, jimp, 12:54
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:51
Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 12:50
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 12:48
Re: The reason why SR is incomplete, tj Frazir, 12:48
Re: Dirac's aether, Paul Stowe, 12:48
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Schoenfeld, 12:47
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Double-A, 12:45
Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, tj Frazir, 12:41
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Gregory L. Hansen, 12:41
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity---The nightbat " Black Comet ", Art Deco, 12:36
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 12:36
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, tj Frazir, 12:33
Re: Dirac's aether, Uncle Al, 12:31
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Helmut Wabnig, 12:31
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 12:31
Re: Help with science for novel., Uncle Al, 12:30
Re: Help with science for novel., Uncle Al, 12:28
Re: Space time ??, Traveler, 12:24
Re: Time energy uncertainty, Mike, 12:23
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", tj Frazir, 12:22
Re: Photonic crystals -- remarkably fertile area of physics research, Autymn D. C., 12:22
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Schoenfeld, 12:21
Re: Entropy question, Gregory L. Hansen, 12:17
Re: Two² points of view Poor ignorant masses, tj Frazir, 12:02
Re: midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, a_plutonium, 12:00
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:58
Re: Two points of view, tj Frazir, 11:56
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Uncle Al, 11:54
Re: Space time ??, tj Frazir, 11:52
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Zigoteau, 11:51
Re: Time energy uncertainty, Uncle Al, 11:48
Re: Von Neumann and Heisenberg on the HUP, OsherD, 11:47
Re: want to buy science-fair accelerator, Uncle Al, 11:44
Re: Time energy uncertainty, Mike, 11:41
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, tj Frazir, 11:41
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Traveler, 11:35
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity---The nightbat " Black Comet ", Autymn D. C., 11:35
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Autymn D. C., 11:29
Re: Two points of view, Autymn D. C., 11:26
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Uncle Al, 11:25
Re: OK, this is it, Joseki, 11:23
Re: Time energy uncertainty, James Copeland, 11:22
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, tj Frazir, 11:20
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", tj Frazir, 11:10
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Jim Black, 11:09
Experimental verification of the Casimir attractive force (Lamoreaux), mountain man, 11:07
Re: Two points of view, tadchem, 10:59
Re: Electron tunneling??, Autymn D. C., 10:50
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, hanson, 10:42
Re: Von Neumann and Heisenberg on the HUP, OsherD, 10:41
Re: Two mirrors facing each other, Autymn D. C., 10:39
Re: Dirac's aether, Androcles, 10:32
Re: The Mysterious Dark Energy, Androcles, 10:30
Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Thomas Smid, 10:28
Von Neumann and Heisenberg on the HUP, OsherD, 10:28
Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, Sam Wormley, 10:27
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Sam Wormley, 10:23
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Androcles, 10:23
Re: want to buy science-fair accelerator, CWatters, 10:22
Dirac's aether, mountain man, 10:21
The Mysterious Dark Energy, mountain man, 10:21
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Jim Black, 10:21
Re: Help with science for novel., CWatters, 10:18
Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Thomas Smid, 10:18
Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Arnold, 10:15
Re: What is a photon?, donstockbauer, 10:15
Re: What is a photon?, donstockbauer, 10:12
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Jim Black, 10:09
Re: What is a photon?, Androcles, 10:07
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, CSCP, 10:06
Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Sam Wormley, 10:02
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 09:55
Re: What is a photon?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:46
Re: Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, Sam Wormley, 09:33
Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light., Androcles, 09:28
Fine Fabric: New, fast way to make sheets of nanotubes, Sam Wormley, 09:28
Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:25
Re: Symmetric language, Androcles, 09:25
Re: Symmetric language, Edward Green, 09:16
Re: Help with science for novel., Androcles, 09:08
Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:00
Re: Symmetric language, Edward Green, 09:00
Strangelets-Hadron Fusion question, Alfred, 08:48
Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:40
Re: Tokamak fusion, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 08:32
Re: Help with science for novel., Mike, 08:32
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Zigoteau, 08:16
Re: Pee powered battery generates 1.5 volts, Dave, 08:15
Re: Symmetric language, michaeld, 07:59
Help with science for novel., Sugapablo, 07:48
Re: Dave Eggers Killed Literature, Poetry, and Physics With Postmodern Anti-Theories Like String Theory, greatbooksclassics, 07:11
Re: Entropy question, Zigoteau, 07:00
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Perspicacious, 06:57
Strangelets Disaster Contingency Plan, CSCP, 06:53
Re: OK, this is it, Richard, 06:46
Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, T Wake, 06:34
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 06:26
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 06:25
Time energy uncertainty, karan, 06:21
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 06:17
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 06:15
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 06:14
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 06:07
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 06:06
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 06:05
want to buy science-fair accelerator, dances_with_barkadas, 06:00
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, donstockbauer, 05:59
Re: GR is a Tower of Babel, Androcles, 05:58
Re: Symmetric language, Math Freak, 05:56
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Androcles, 05:56
Re: Symmetric language, Math Freak, 05:47
Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Martin Hogbin, 05:46
Re: Uncle Al is a computer program, dedanoe, 05:41
Uncle Al is a computer program, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 05:36
Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Arnold, 05:10
Re: Reality of black holes, h . poropudas, 05:09
Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?, dances_with_barkadas, 05:02
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 05:01
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Schoenfeld, 04:53
Re: Mapping the domains of the sciences to its theories, mountain man, 04:53
Mapping the domains of the sciences to its theories, mountain man, 04:46
Re: Pee powered battery generates 1.5 volts, Michael, 04:45
Re: Pee powered battery generates 1.5 volts, Michael, 04:42
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 04:38
Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, the softrat, 04:37
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity---The nightbat " Black Comet ", nightbat, 04:06
Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?, Arnold, 03:20
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 03:16
Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Y.Porat, 03:08
Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Y.Porat, 03:05
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity---The nightbat " Black Comet ", Twittering One, 02:52
Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Bob Cain, 02:34
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity---The nightbat " Black Comet ", nightbat, 02:19
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 02:06
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, The Ghost In The Machine, 02:00
Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, The Ghost In The Machine, 02:00
Re: No black holes just an extreme of gravity, Bob Cain, 01:53
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, John Sefton, 01:17

August 19, 2005

Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Eugene Stefanovich, 23:51
Re: Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether, Nick, 23:43
Re: Three phases of acceleration, schoenfeld1, 23:29
Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether, Laurent, 23:28
Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction, macromitch, 23:04
Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction, Mike, 22:47
Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Murat . H . Ozer, 22:30
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 22:25
Re: Article: Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory, xxein, 22:19
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, macromitch, 22:13
Re: impenetrability, hanson, 21:55
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", tj Frazir, 21:50
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 21:47
Re: fastest way to stir sugar into coffee/tea?, tj Frazir, 21:37
Re: New Information re Gravity, tj Frazir, 21:31
Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Billy Bob, 21:23
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Jason Stanidge, 21:19
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Jason Stanidge, 21:13
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Sam Wormley, 20:44
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Sam Wormley, 20:42
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 20:37
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 20:37
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Don1, 20:36
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Don1, 20:33
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Sam Wormley, 20:30
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 20:27
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Sam Wormley, 20:24
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, TokaMundo, 20:17
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, Don1, 20:16
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Sam Wormley, 20:16
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, TokaMundo, 20:15
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, TokaMundo, 20:13
Re: Entropy question, Craig Franck, 20:13
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, TokaMundo, 20:12
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 20:09
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 20:05
Re: Symmetric language, Edward Green, 19:47
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Timothy Little, 19:33
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Nick, 18:58
Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, T Wake, 18:57
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Double-A, 18:56
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, T Wake, 18:55
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, T Wake, 18:54
Re: sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W, vanep, 18:52
Re: pressurized airplane cabins, Androcles, 18:48
Re: Why matter slows light, Tom Roberts, 18:47
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Nick, 18:46
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Androcles, 18:22
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, Androcles, 18:15
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Double-A, 18:12
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, PD, 18:08
Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, Quantum Mirror, 18:08
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Androcles, 18:00
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 17:59
Re: Two points of view, PD, 17:58
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, macromitch, 17:58
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, PD, 17:57
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Uncle Al, 17:51
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Uncle Al, 17:49
Re: Symmetric language, Uncle Al, 17:36
Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, macromitch, 17:33
Re: Two points of view, Don1, 17:30
Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline", Jan Panteltje, 17:22
Re: New Information re Gravity, Jan Panteltje, 17:18
Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, Uncle Al, 17:13
Re: OK, this is it, Hatunen, 17:10
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, Brad Guth, 16:56
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 16:52
Re: sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W, Mike, 16:48
Re: General Relativity, Randy Poe, 16:48
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, Jan Panteltje, 16:46
"Ph.D.s in America on the decline", yared22311, 16:42
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 16:40
Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?, Sam Wormley, 16:29
Re: Gibbs Rant-a-dox, Edward Green, 16:28
Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?, Timo Nieminen, 16:23
New Information re Gravity, Charles, 16:21
Re: Symmetric language, Edward Green, 16:19
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 16:11
Re: Two points of view, tadchem, 16:06
Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?, newedana, 16:05
Is light deflected by electric fields?, Thomas Smid, 16:04
Re: OK, this is it, Josef Matz, 16:02
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Sam Wormley, 15:53
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:50
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 15:45
Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, Martin, 15:45
Re: GR is a Tower of Babel, Androcles, 15:44
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Sam Wormley, 15:18
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 15:09
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, Sam Wormley, 15:01
Re: The technologist has created an electro-magnetically propelled..., Sam Wormley, 14:56
Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, simon, 14:46
Re: hubble deep shot, John Sefton, 14:44
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 742 August 19, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley, 14:38
Re: Symmetric language, Uncle Al, 14:31
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, Jan Panteltje, 14:28
Re: General Relativity, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:09
Re: GR is a Tower of Babel, hanson, 14:08
Re: General Relativity, Androcles, 14:07
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 14:00
Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, Quantum Mirror, 13:59
Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18), Schoenfeld, 13:54
Re: Three phases of accelerationexit, briggs, 13:53
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Paul Cardinale, 13:49
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 13:41
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 13:37
Re: fastest way to stir sugar into coffee/tea?, tj Frazir, 13:37
Re: Space time ??, tj Frazir, 13:31
Baby carrots freezing at T>273?, simon, 13:16
Re: OK, this is it, Richard, 13:15
Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?, TokaMundo, 13:12
Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?, Androcles, 13:11
Re: PERFECT EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT (P.E.L.E.), donstockbauer, 13:08
Re: Dirac and the aether postulate, FrediFizzx, 13:07
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 13:04
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, TokaMundo, 13:03
Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, Jan Panteltje, 13:01
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Randy Poe, 12:57
Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations, Autymn D. C., 12:56
Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?, Andy Resnick, 12:48
midpoint of 10-adics Re: Integral Adics = 1 or Integral Adics = ...999999 ??? Re: Equation of Everything, a_plutonium, 12:48
Re: General Relativity, Randy Poe, 12:40
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, Jan Panteltje, 12:35
Re: The technologist has created an electro-magnetically propelled..., CWatters, 12:35
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 12:31
Re: General Relativity, Androcles, 12:29
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, TokaMundo, 12:23
Re: sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W, Sam Wormley, 12:22
Re: Gibbs Rant-a-dox, Andy Resnick, 12:21
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, TokaMundo, 12:19
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 12:18
Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, TokaMundo, 12:18
Re: sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:16
Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, TokaMundo, 12:15
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, TokaMundo, 12:11
Re: Entropy question, Edward Green, 12:10
Re: Entropy question, Edward Green, 12:05
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, TokaMundo, 12:04
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, TokaMundo, 11:58
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, TokaMundo, 11:57
Re: Space time ??, PD, 11:57
Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:57
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, TokaMundo, 11:55
Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1, TokaMundo, 11:54
Re: Entropy question, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:53
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 11:53
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, TokaMundo, 11:53
Re: Three phases of acceleration, PD, 11:52
Re: Entropy question, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:51
Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, footballdvds, 11:41
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:41
Symmetric language, Edward Green, 11:35
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Mitchell Jones, 11:29
Re: Spiral Star Shaped Cone Hole in rock. what could it be?, John Popelish, 11:27
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:22
doom, kstocklmeir, 11:19
doom, kstocklmeir, 11:19
doom, kstocklmeir, 11:19
doom, kstocklmeir, 11:18
Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, Michael Moroney, 11:17
The technologist has created an electro-magnetically propelled..., Sam Wormley, 11:08
Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction, Dr Photon, 11:03
Re: GR is a Tower of Babel, Sam Wormley, 10:56
Re: GR is a Tower of Babel, Uncle Al, 10:54
sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W, Mike, 10:49
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Mike, 10:45
Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction, Schoenfeld, 10:37
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, George, 10:32
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Sam Wormley, 10:29
Re: "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", donstockbauer, 10:29
Re: GR is a Tower of Babel, tdp1001, 10:28
"The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", Meti, 10:22
Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, David, 10:22
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Don1, 10:19
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, donstockbauer, 10:12
Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, donstockbauer, 10:11
Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, Sam Wormley, 10:07
Re: some representation theory questions, Puppet_Sock, 10:06
Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, Sam Wormley, 10:06
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 10:04
Re: Temprature on Moon Surface, Sam Wormley, 10:04
Re: Article: Dwarf galaxy lights up dark matter debate, Puppet_Sock, 10:02
Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, Y.Porat, 10:01
Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, PD, 09:59
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Herman Trivilino, 09:59
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 09:51
Re: Three phases of acceleration, PD, 09:51
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 09:38
Temprature on Moon Surface, George, 09:31
Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:29
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Andy Resnick, 09:21
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 09:20
Re: PLANETARY ORBITS BY THERMODYNAMICS, Sam Wormley, 09:11
Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction, Dr Photon, 09:07
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 08:56
Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, David, 08:40
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, nightbat, 08:32
Re: Three phases of acceleration, oconnell, 08:18
PLANETARY ORBITS BY THERMODYNAMICS, ACE, 08:17
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, Double-A, 07:59
Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction, Mike, 07:05
Re: There Are No Black Holes Just an Extreme of Gravity, nightbat, 07:02
Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?, unamerican, 07:00
Re: Two points of view, Don1, 06:56
Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy, Y.Porat, 06:47
Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes, Jan Panteltje, 06:46
Re: Two points of view, Don1, 06:42
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 06:32
Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?, Jan Panteltje, 06:24
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 06:19
Article: Pee-powered battery smaller than a credit card, Robert Karl Stonjek, 06:08
Article: Dwarf galaxy lights up dark matter debate, Robert Karl Stonjek, 06:01
Re: What is a photon?, Schoenfeld, 03:33
Re: Three phases of acceleration, Schoenfeld, 03:19
Re: Theory of acceleration, GeekBoy, 02:31
Re: Reality of black holes, h . poropudas, 02:27

August 12, 2005

Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Christopher Kerr, 11:57
Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect, Mark Fergerson, 11:56
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Matthew Lybanon, 11:55
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, deowll, 11:55
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, deowll, 11:51
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, deowll, 11:50
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Ken Muldrew, 11:46
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 11:42
Re: Gibbs Paradox, Ken Muldrew, 11:38
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 741 August 12, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley, 11:35
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:29
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 11:28
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, deowll, 11:25
Re: energy, John Sefton, 11:09
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Sam Wormley, 10:55
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, mountain man, 10:53
Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Sam Wormley, 10:52
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, PD, 10:48
Re: Weight = mass x g, Don1, 10:46
Re: Just a big question..., Charles, 10:43
Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, PD, 10:43
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 10:42
"The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Tahc, 10:42
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 10:41
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 10:36
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Richard Henry, 10:34
Re: Mossbauer effect and tunnel effect in Model of Reality, fbonsignore, 10:34
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, PD, 10:28
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Sam Wormley, 10:25
Terrorists, they brought my cats to the streets of this country, fbonsignore, 10:21
Re: Weight = mass x g, Sam Wormley, 10:15
Re: Big Bertha Thing blogs, Tony Lance, 10:14
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, PD, 10:10
Re: Reality of black holes, jem, 10:09
Re: Gibbs Paradox, Andy Resnick, 10:02
Re: basic question classical v. relativity, Andy Resnick, 09:57
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Andy Resnick, 09:54
Re: energy, Sam Wormley, 09:51
Re: attractive slope exchange - how?, tj Frazir, 09:50
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, p6, 09:37
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Nosterill, 09:37
energy, zomoco1, 09:35
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, p6, 09:25
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location..., tj Frazir, 09:10
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location..., tj Frazir, 09:06
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Christian Winter, 09:05
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 08:14
some representation theory questions, m1ngleg02, 07:56
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Autymn D. C., 07:33
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 07:24
Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations 3, OsherD, 07:21
Schroedinger's Darn Cat, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 07:17
Re: Weight = mass x g, Clemens W, 07:11
Re: Weight = mass x g, Herman Trivilino, 07:11
Re: basic question classical v. relativity, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:09
Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:08
Re: basic question classical v. relativity, Herman Trivilino, 07:06
Re: basic question classical v. relativity, Herman Trivilino, 07:02
Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:02
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:03
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, S. Enterprize Company, 06:01
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:01
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Jerry, 06:00
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:59
Book: Matters of Gravity, Robert Karl Stonjek, 05:44
Re: Weight = mass x g, LeoK, 05:33
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:27
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:23
Re: vortex, S. Enterprize Company, 05:23
Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:22
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, S. Enterprize Company, 05:17
Re: Weight = mass x g, Clemens W, 05:17
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, S. Enterprize Company, 05:10
Re: basic question classical v. relativity, jmfbahciv, 05:00
Re: vortex, Zigoteau, 04:54
Re: Just a big question..., the softrat, 04:53
Re: Weight = mass x g, CWatters, 04:47
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Don1, 03:51
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, jmfbahciv, 03:48
Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, Gbeat24, 03:43
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Don1, 03:39
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, jmfbahciv, 03:39
Re: basic question classical v. relativity, jmfbahciv, 03:30
Re: Weight = mass x g, snapdragon31, 03:05
Re: basic question classical v. relativity, mmeron, 02:53
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, mmeron, 02:49
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Schoenfeld, 02:28
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 01:58
Equation of Everything (they said it would be elegant and obvious, and that it is) Re: logic/math test that tells whether Big Bang is true or a fake, a_plutonium, 01:37
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, franklinhu, 01:24
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Matthew Lybanon, 01:09
Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
Re: Where does light go?, Y.Porat, 00:50
Re: virtual particle interactions, Y.Porat, 00:43
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Nick, 00:22
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 00:18
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Y.Porat, 00:13
Re: basic question classical v. relativity, Sam Wormley, 00:08
basic question classical v. relativity, zxcv_890, 00:01
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00

August 11, 2005

Re: The Subatomic and Primordial Energies, Sam Wormley, 23:51
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 23:45
The ups and downs of doping, Sam Wormley, 23:36
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, J, 23:35
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 22:20
Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?, night soil dalits, 22:14
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 21:46
CONGRESS OKs $17.3M to Honor Smithsonian Scientist --, Ed Conrad, 21:39
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 21:30
Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?, Edward Green, 21:01
Re: The Subatomic and Primordial Energies, Quantum Mirror, 20:51
Re: Mossbauer effect and tunnel effect in Model of Reality, western1lands, 20:45
Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?, Uncle Al, 20:40
Re: The Subatomic and Primordial Energies, Uncle Al, 20:39
Re: Weight = mass x g, Herman Trivilino, 20:24
Re: Weight = mass x g, Sam Wormley, 20:23
Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?, Robert Karl Stonjek, 20:07
Re: Weight = mass x g, Don1, 19:51
The Subatomic and Primordial Energies, Dale Evans, 19:37
Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, the softrat, 19:12
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, TomGee, 18:46
Re: sci.physics = sci.physics.pub, hanson, 18:37
Re: (No Subject), Uncle Al, 18:35
Re: Weight = mass x g, Uncle Al, 18:34
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Richard Henry, 18:14
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Ken Muldrew, 18:12
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Strange Indeed, 18:03
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Externet, 18:01
Re: Weight = mass x g, 888, 18:00
Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, tj Frazir, 18:00
Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, mark_tarka, 17:58
Re: Weight = mass x g, Don1, 17:40
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, PD, 17:38
Re: Weight = mass x g, Uncle Al, 17:21
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Uncle Al, 17:20
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Ken Muldrew, 17:18
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, Edgar Svendsen, 17:16
Innovation for the Lazy Resident (no helpful responses), mwmiller314, 17:15
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, PD, 17:13
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, p6, 17:09
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Externet, 17:00
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, PD, 16:52
Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:42
Re: HUBBLE PHOTOS Shaking Up ALL of Science, CWatters, 16:38
Re: virtual particle interactions, Androcles, 16:36
Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, TomGee, 16:26
Weight = mass x g, Don1, 16:14
Re: sci.physics = sci.physics.pub, Math Freak, 16:13
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 16:11
Re: HUBBLE PHOTOS Shaking Up ALL of Science, T Wake, 16:08
Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution, sdr, 16:07
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 16:06
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 16:00
Re: Gibbs Paradox, Ken Muldrew, 15:52
HUBBLE PHOTOS Shaking Up ALL of Science, edconrad, 15:51
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 15:49
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 15:46
Re: virtual particle interactions, Autymn D. C., 15:44
Re: Gibbs Paradox, Andy Resnick, 15:41
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, PD, 15:31
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Richard Henry, 15:28
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Ken S. Tucker, 15:26
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 15:22
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 15:21
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, franklinhu, 15:19
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Greg Neill, 15:12
Re: sci.physics = sci.physics.pub, Uncle Al, 15:04
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, mmeron, 14:51
Re: fMRI in the comfort of your own home, Dr Photon, 14:48
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, mmeron, 14:48
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 14:41
Re: sci.physics = sci.physics.pub, Math Freak, 14:26
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Externet, 14:25
Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Jan Panteltje, 14:22
Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, T Wake, 14:19
Re: gravity and black holes, T Wake, 14:19
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Richard Henry, 14:08
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 14:07
fMRI in the comfort of your own home, Dr Photon, 14:03
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 13:49
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Sam Wormley, 13:48
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Mark lman, 13:45
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 13:45
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The morons do stack, T Wake, 13:44
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 13:43
Re: mimical force, T Wake, 13:42
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, T Wake, 13:40
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Externet, 13:39
Re: Where does light go?, T Wake, 13:37
Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Uncle Al, 13:36
Re: Where does light go?, T Wake, 13:35
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Androcles, 13:34
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Androcles, 13:34
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Androcles, 13:34
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Androcles, 13:33
Re: Bhabha Scattering significance, Androcles, 13:32
Re: doom, Androcles, 13:30
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, PD, 13:30
Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Androcles, 13:29
Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, Androcles, 13:29
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Androcles, 13:28
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, T Wake, 13:28
Re: virtual particle interactions, PD, 13:28
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Androcles, 13:27
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Androcles, 13:27
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Androcles, 13:26
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Androcles, 13:26
Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Uncle Al, 13:25
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Androcles, 13:25
Re: mimical force, Androcles, 13:25
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Androcles, 13:24
Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Uncle Al, 13:24
Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Uncle Al, 13:23
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, Androcles, 13:22
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, Androcles, 13:22
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, Androcles, 13:22
Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Uncle Al, 13:21
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, Androcles, 13:21
Re: virtual particle interactions, Androcles, 13:21
Re: virtual particle interactions, Androcles, 13:20
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Uncle Al, 13:19
Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, Uncle Al, 13:18
Re: NASA brings back the Trash, Uncle Al, 13:15
Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, Y.Porat, 13:13
Re: Where does light go?, reddred, 13:12
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Everett M. Greene, 13:12
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Uncle Al, 13:11
Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Attila the Bum, 13:03
Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Uncle Al, 13:02
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Autymn D. C., 12:58
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Dr Photon, 12:47
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Math Freak, 12:29
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., TomGee, 12:28
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Richard Schultz, 12:26
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., TomGee, 12:23
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Math Freak, 12:18
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., TomGee, 12:17
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 12:08
Re: Bhabha Scattering significance, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 12:03
Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Richard Herring, 12:00
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., TomGee, 11:50
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Sam Wormley, 11:46
Re: vortex, Ken S. Tucker, 11:41
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Richard Henry, 11:35
Re: vortex, Zigoteau, 11:32
Re: Mossbauer effect and tunnel effect in Model of Reality, fbonsignore, 11:27
Re: Who gains from CORPERATE STATES OF AMERICA, tj Frazir, 11:26
Re: Reality of black holes, Autymn D. C., 11:23
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 11:18
Re: vortex, Puppet_Sock, 11:18
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 11:13
Re: Mossbauer effect and tunnel effect in Model of Reality, fbonsignore, 11:11
Re: Mossbauer effect and tunnel effect in Model of Reality, fbonsignore, 11:11
Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, tj Frazir, 11:08
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Randy Poe, 11:02
Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Sam Wormley, 11:01
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Autymn D. C., 10:58
vortex, myth, 10:56
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The morons do stack, tj Frazir, 10:54
Re: negative information, Autymn D. C., 10:54
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, PD, 10:44
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 10:43
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 10:42
Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Paul Cardinale, 10:42
Re: Bhabha Scattering significance, PD, 10:38
Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, PD, 10:25
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 10:23
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 10:20
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, PD, 10:17
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Dr Photon, 09:58
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Egral, 09:52
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Egral, 09:52
Re: virtual particle interactions, PD, 09:44
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Puppet_Sock, 09:31
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, SSJVCmag, 09:20
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Sam Wormley, 09:17
negative information, Mike Maxwell, 09:14
Re: A Natural Pit, Seven Gallon Pail Thermonuke, Douglas Eagleson, 09:08
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, mountain man, 08:51
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Dr Photon, 08:49
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Andy Resnick, 08:27
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Richard Schultz, 08:18
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Andy Resnick, 08:17
Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations 2, OsherD, 08:12
Re: virtual particle interactions, Y.Porat, 07:59
Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:57
Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:54
Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, Bruce Scott TOK, 07:49
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 07:42
Re: virtual particle interactions, Autymn D. C., 07:39
Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 07:37
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, George, 07:10
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Larry Lard, 06:48
Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?, RolandRB, 06:43
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:16
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:11
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:08
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 06:03
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:49
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:48
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:45
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:43
Re: logic/math test that tells whether Big Bang is true or a fake, john_ramsden, 05:42
Re: Bhabha Scattering significance, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:39
Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:30
Re: Shadow Matter (E8xE8 gauge symmetry group), Dr Photon, 05:06
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Steve Ralph, 04:49
How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?, Gbeat24, 04:46
Re: Black body radiation, Zigoteau, 04:39
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, jmfbahciv, 04:30
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, the softrat, 04:13
Re: GR perplexity for a layman, the softrat, 03:43
Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Bob Cain, 03:35
Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Schoenfeld, 03:35
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Helmut Wabnig, 03:15
Re: Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations, OsherD, 01:46
Re: this term: billion times more neutrinos than white matter Re: Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Quantum Mirror, 01:41
Re: Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations, OsherD, 01:35
Bhabha Scattering significance, parti, 01:35
Re: Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations, OsherD, 01:14
Re: Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations, OsherD, 01:05
Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Jim Black, 01:03
Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Richard Henry, 00:55
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Timo Nieminen, 00:48
Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations, OsherD, 00:43
Re: virtual particle interactions, Y.Porat, 00:41
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Richard Schultz, 00:33
Einstein (1905) Absurdities, Eleaticus, 00:25
(SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals, Eleaticus, 00:25
Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence, Eleaticus, 00:25
Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws, Eleaticus, 00:25
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, night soil dalits, 00:23
Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, Y.Porat, 00:22
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, Externet, 00:15
Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, the softrat, 00:09
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 00:04
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 00:02

August 10, 2005

Re: Irregardless of any accretion, a supernova is a collapsing star., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 23:59
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 23:57
Our little sci.chem and sci.chem.analytical butt buddy Joel Evan Polowin....., Joel Polowin, 23:53
Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?, RP, 23:50
Is there any harmless radiation ?, Externet, 23:46
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, p6, 23:38
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 23:22
Re: Gibbs Paradox, Edward Green, 22:57
Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy, Sam Wormley, 22:57
Re: NASA brings back the Trash, Sam Wormley, 22:47
Re: Gibbs Paradox, Edward Green, 22:43
NASA brings back the Trash, night soil dalits, 22:40
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Timo Nieminen, 22:40
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bob Cain, 22:39
Re: Where does light go?, reddred, 22:33
Re: Where does light go?, Nick, 22:31
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 22:23
Re: gravity and black holes, Sam Wormley, 22:07
Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Sam Wormley, 22:05
Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Sam Wormley, 22:03
Re: PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS, Sam Wormley, 22:01
Re: virtual particle interactions, Nick, 21:56
PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS, ACE, 21:53
Re: GR perplexity for a layman, ACE, 21:52
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 21:50
Re: GR perplexity for a layman, Nick, 21:48
Re: gravity and black holes, Nick, 21:46
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 21:45
At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant, Don1, 21:44
Re: gravity and black holes, Uncle Al, 21:36
Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, Schoenfeld, 21:35
Re: What would the ultimate manifestation of macro quantum entanglement be?, Proginoskes, 21:31
gravity and black holes, conradeaton, 21:22
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 21:15
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Mitchell Jones, 21:02
Re: Where does light go?, studiorat, 20:42
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Uncle Al, 20:09
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Edward Green, 20:06
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, p6, 19:53
Re: mimical force, Sam Wormley, 19:49
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, p6, 19:47
Re: Herc's copyright infinite energy machine, |-|erc, 19:42
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 19:41
Re: Velocity of Electrons, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:40
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 19:37
Re: virtual particle interactions, Sam Wormley, 19:37
Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?, the softrat, 19:36
Re: mimical force, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:33
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Sam Wormley, 19:31
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 19:29
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM fi..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:26
Re: Solved equation resource, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:19
Re: Where does light go?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:10
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 19:01
Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:58
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 18:52
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 18:34
Re: Take the rate out of the EP * Nth Complexity, T Wake, 18:33
Re: Dimensions move., T Wake, 18:33
Shadow Matter (E8xE8 gauge symmetry group), p6, 18:30
Re: operator trace, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 18:26
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, tadchem, 18:17
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, p6, 18:07
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Richard Henry, 18:06
Re: Where does light go?, mountain man, 18:03
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, C. Bond, 18:01
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Uncle Al, 17:57
Re: Take the rate out of the EP * Nth Complexity, Nick, 17:54
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 17:50
Re: Dimensions move., Nick, 17:49
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, PD, 17:26
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Mr Pixie, 17:22
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, PD, 16:55
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, John C . Polasek, 16:55
Re: Black body radiation, mike3, 16:49
Re: Tucker basic cosmology, Ken S. Tucker, 16:49
Re: Dimensions move., Mr Pixie, 16:48
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 16:47
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 16:43
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:37
Re: epicenter at a federal level, David DeLaney, 16:28
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 16:17
Re: mimical force for morons, T Wake, 16:14
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 16:13
Re: Where does light go?, T Wake, 16:11
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 16:10
Re: WHY GREAT MINDS CAN'T GRASP CONSCIOUSNESS, T Wake, 16:08
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 15:58
Re: Take the rate out of the EP * Nth Complexity, T Wake, 15:50
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, PD, 15:50
Re: Time Not Relative, Nick, 15:47
Re: virtual particle interactions, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:44
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, PD, 15:43
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 15:42
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 15:42
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 15:40
Re: Mossbauer effect and tunnel effect in Model of Reality, fbonsignore, 15:38
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 15:37
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, franklinhu, 15:36
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:33
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 15:30
Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, briggs, 15:29
Re: wisdom, c and r, T Wake, 15:12
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, T Wake, 15:11
Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent, Don1, 15:07
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:05
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 14:58
Re: Hi twake!!!, T Wake, 14:58
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 14:55
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 14:49
Re: airplanes and buildings (again?), Autymn D. C., 14:43
Re: Gibbs Paradox, Ken Muldrew, 14:42
Re: impenetrability, Uncle Al, 14:24
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 14:21
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Sam Wormley, 14:19
Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Attila the Bum, 14:14
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Autymn D. C., 14:12
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., TomGee, 14:08
Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Prai Jei, 14:04
Re: A Natural Pit, Seven Gallon Pail Thermonuke, e1TymPadz, 14:01
Re: Time Not Relative, Paul Cardinale, 13:58
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., TomGee, 13:58
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 13:57
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 13:53
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 13:51
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 13:48
Re: I like double negatives., Autymn D. C., 13:25
Re: Hi twake!!!, tj Frazir, 13:17
logic/math test that tells whether Big Bang is true or a fake Re: the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, a_plutonium, 13:16
Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect, Autymn D. C., 13:06
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, PD, 13:00
I like double negatives., Jeff_Relf, 12:56
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, PD, 12:47
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 12:42
doom, kstocklmeir, 12:39
Re: Irregardless of any accretion, a supernova is a collapsing star., PD, 12:34
Re: virtual particle interactions, PD, 12:33
Re: impenetrability, Don1, 12:32
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 12:30
Re: impenetrability, Don1, 12:27
Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, a_plutonium, 12:11
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, tj Frazir, 12:02
Re: Velocity of Electrons, Aydin, 11:58
Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:54
Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Uncle Al, 11:51
Re: wisdom, c and r, Uncle Al, 11:50
Re: aether must be kept here, Uncle Al, 11:49
Re: Tucker basic cosmology, Uncle Al, 11:47
Re: Black body radiation, Uncle Al, 11:45
Re: impenetrability, Uncle Al, 11:43
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:43
Re: Fundamentals, Uncle Al, 11:39
Re: impenetrability, Mike, 11:37
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:25
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:01
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 10:47
Re: Where does light go?, Sam Wormley, 10:44
Re: Where does light go?, Sam Wormley, 10:43
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 10:40
Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Jan Panteltje, 10:29
Re: NASA's SNAP probe to find 6 thousand supernovae., Sam Wormley, 10:12
Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Everett M. Greene, 09:59
Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Sam Wormley, 09:58
Re: Biological Convergence, Not Intelligent Design (was: New Ideas for Intelligent Design!), Quantum Mirror, 09:56
Re: impenetrability, Dr Photon, 09:54
"The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Ypoc, 09:54
Re: Fundamentals, Sam Wormley, 09:54
Re: Herc's copyright infinite energy machine, Zigoteau, 09:54
Re: doom, Autymn D. C., 09:53
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Jerry, 09:46
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 09:43
Re: Tucker basic cosmology, feuerbac, 09:35
Re: Herc's copyright infinite energy machine, CWatters, 09:32
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, p6, 09:31
Re: Fundamentals, Don1, 09:31
Re: impenetrability, Andy Resnick, 09:30
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., feuerbac, 09:26
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., feuerbac, 09:24
Re: Fundamentals, Don1, 09:23
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., feuerbac, 09:22
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 09:21
Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, George, 09:20
Re: Gibbs Paradox, Andy Resnick, 09:17
Re: virtual particle interactions, Y.Porat, 09:16
Re: Fundamentals, Don1, 09:14
Re: Biological Convergence, Not Intelligent Design (was: New Ideas for Intelligent Design!), Autymn D. C., 09:14
Re: Where does light go?, Y.Porat, 09:13
Re: Reality of black holes, jem, 09:09
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 09:05
Re: Fundamentals, Don1, 09:05
Re: operator trace, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:02
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 09:01
Re: Irregardless of any accretion, a supernova is a collapsing star., Sam Wormley, 08:59
Re: impenetrability, Sam Wormley, 08:50
Re: impenetrability, Sam Wormley, 08:48
Re: impenetrability, Smolley, 08:47
Re: impenetrability, Sam Wormley, 08:46
Re: Black body radiation, Sam Wormley, 08:42
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Schoenfeld, 08:41
Re: Tucker basic cosmology, Sam Wormley, 08:37
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Richard Schultz, 08:28
Re: impenetrability, Don1, 08:27
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 08:23
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, mountain man, 08:18
Re: Where does light go?, mountain man, 08:18
Re: Irregardless of any accretion, a supernova is a collapsing star., Autymn D. C., 07:47
Re: impenetrability, Don1, 07:27
Re: impenetrability, Don1, 07:26
Herc's copyright infinite energy machine, |-|erc, 07:21
Re: phase consistency of photons in a stream, p . kinsler, 07:18
Re: impenetrability, Don1, 07:08
Re: impenetrability, Dr Photon, 07:02
Re: Velocity of Electrons, AJW, 06:49
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:40
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:30
Re: Irregardless of any accretion, a supernova is a collapsing star., bz, 06:17
Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Jan Panteltje, 06:13
Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Jan Panteltje, 06:13
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 06:13
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 06:06
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:01
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 06:00
Re: virtual particle interactions, Autymn D. C., 05:56
Re: virtual particle interactions, Y.Porat, 05:45
Re: Where does light go?, Gareth Magennis, 05:24
Re: Where does light go?, Bob Cain, 05:19
Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Zigoteau, 05:13
NASA's SNAP probe to find 6 thousand supernovae., Jeff_Relf, 05:11
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, jmfbahciv, 04:46
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, jmfbahciv, 04:42
Re: impenetrability, tadchem, 04:40
Re: Black body radiation, Zigoteau, 04:31
Irregardless of any accretion, a supernova is a collapsing star., Jeff_Relf, 04:22
Re: Innovation for the Lazy Resident, mwmiller314, 03:37
Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Autymn D. C., 03:19
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 03:18
Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Odysseus, 03:17
Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Theo J, 02:52
Re: Index To Dimensions 2: Additional Dimensional Subtypes, OsherD, 02:44
Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, a_plutonium, 02:38
why converges to what Re: the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, a_plutonium, 02:25
Tucker basic cosmology, Ken S. Tucker, 02:07
Re: Index To Dimensions 2: Additional Dimensional Subtypes, OsherD, 02:02
Re: Velocity of Electrons, Aydin, 02:02
Re: Index To Dimensions 2: Additional Dimensional Subtypes, Nick, 02:01
Index To Dimensions 2: Additional Dimensional Subtypes, OsherD, 01:55
Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch, Nick, 01:50
Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Nick, 01:40
Re: impenetrability, Proginoskes, 01:40
Re: impenetrability, Proginoskes, 01:37
Re: What would the ultimate manifestation of macro quantum entanglement be?, |-|erc, 01:35
Re: Where does light go?, Nick, 01:34
Re: What would the ultimate manifestation of macro quantum entanglement be?, Proginoskes, 01:24
Re: Europeans to make eternal planes to watch over the USA, Edward Green, 01:15
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Y.Porat, 01:06
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Richard Schultz, 01:04
Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:00
Re: Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings, Edward Green, 00:54
Re: Fundamentals, Earle Jones, 00:35
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Jim Heckman, 00:23
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, p6, 00:23
Re: operator trace, Edward Green, 00:17
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Jim Black, 00:16

August 09, 2005

Re: Gibbs Paradox, Edward Green, 23:43
Take the rate out of the EP * Nth Complexity, Nick, 23:06
Someday It Will All Be Clear, Charles, 23:03
Re: impenetrability, Sam Wormley, 23:00
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 22:55
Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Ron Verrall, 22:47
Re: impenetrability, the softrat, 22:40
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, the softrat, 22:39
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 22:08
Re: Groups and crystal properties, night soil dalits, 22:02
Re: impenetrability, Uncle Al, 21:52
Re: Fundamentals, Uncle Al, 21:50
Re: Popular Handbook Microscope 1905 FA, night soil dalits, 21:49
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 21:48
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 21:47
Re: Where does light go?, your lover, 21:25
Re: What would the ultimate manifestation of macro quantum entanglement be?, |-|erc, 21:04
Re: Time Not Relative, Strange Indeed, 21:04
Re: Fundamentals, Herman Trivilino, 20:46
Re: the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, Orion, 20:45
Re: The difference between a nova and a type Ia supernova., Sam Wormley, 20:30
Re: impenetrability, Sam Wormley, 20:26
Re: impenetrability, Clemens W, 20:24
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Mitchell Jones, 20:00
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, darthpup, 19:56
Re: The difference between a nova and a type Ia supernova., bz, 19:53
Re: What would the ultimate manifestation of macro quantum entanglement be?, Proginoskes, 19:45
impenetrability, Don1, 19:35
Re: What would the ultimate manifestation of macro quantum entanglement be?, |-|erc, 19:35
Re: mimical force for morons, tj Frazir, 19:24
Re: Mossbauer effect and tunnel effect in Model of Reality, western1lands, 19:24
Re: Gravitational naughtiness, T Wake, 19:19
Re: Fundamentals, Sam Wormley, 19:16
Fundamentals, Don1, 19:11
Re: Gravitational naughtiness, tj Frazir, 19:05
Re: A puzzle :-), Math Freak, 18:44
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, tj Frazir, 18:43
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, TomGee, 18:39
Popular Handbook Microscope 1905 FA, JaneyP, 18:28
Re: the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, Timothy, 18:17
Re: Time Not Relative, John Sefton, 18:01
Mossbauer effect and tunnel effect in Model of Reality, fbonsignore, 17:52
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 17:51
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 17:51
Re: Dramatis Personae III, fbonsignore, 17:46
Re: Time Not Relative, Uncle Al, 17:32
The difference between a nova and a type Ia supernova., Jeff_Relf, 17:30
Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, Uncle Al, 17:29
Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans, Jan Panteltje, 17:20
Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, AES, 17:20
Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, John C . Polasek, 16:57
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:55
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, Attila the Bum, 16:23
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, T Wake, 16:23
Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Theo J, 16:05
Time Not Relative, ?, 16:01
Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Autymn D. C., 15:59
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 15:51
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 15:39
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 15:36
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, Autymn D. C., 15:35
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 15:27
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Autymn D. C., 15:24
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Autymn D. C., 15:22
Re: Q: Groups and crystal properties, PD, 15:21
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, Autymn D. C., 15:15
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, John C . Polasek, 15:12
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 15:07
Worlds Top Scientists Ponder.., shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 15:06
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, dedanoe, 15:05
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, PD, 15:05
Re: Reality of black holes, Autymn D. C., 15:00
Re: Gravitational naughtiness, Sam Wormley, 14:42
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Autymn D. C., 14:39
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 14:33
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Puppet_Sock, 14:30
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, TomGee, 14:25
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, PD, 14:18
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 14:17
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 14:12
Re: mimical force for morons, T Wake, 14:12
Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Autymn D. C., 14:08
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 14:02
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 13:58
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, a_plutonium, 13:56
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 13:55
Re: Toothpick Bridge Interest?, Androcles, 13:48
Re: airplanes and buildings (again?), Randy Poe, 13:47
Re: the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, a_plutonium, 13:40
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, PD, 13:35
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, TomGee, 13:31
Q: Groups and crystal properties, Andy Resnick, 13:21
Re: mimical force for morons, tj Frazir, 13:15
Re: mimical force for morons, tj Frazir, 13:12
Re: bubble- fusion, Uncle Al, 13:09
Re: A Realistic Hypothesis by Elmo Mottard, Uncle Al, 13:07
Re: doom, Uncle Al, 13:06
Re: airplanes and buildings (again?), Autymn D. C., 13:01
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, tj Frazir, 12:58
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Matthew Lybanon, 12:56
Re: What would the ultimate manifestation of macro quantum entanglement be?, Autymn D. C., 12:40
Re: doom, T Wake, 12:25
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 12:22
bubble- fusion, heiack, 12:22
Re: mimical force for morons, T Wake, 12:21
Re: NASA should do a spacewalk to get the toilet paper off my shoe, Autymn D. C., 12:16
Re: A puzzle :-), The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
A Realistic Hypothesis by Elmo Mottard, elmom15@xxxxxxxxx, 11:59
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 11:57
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Bruce Scott TOK, 11:55
Re: virtual particle interactions, PD, 11:47
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Everett M. Greene, 11:35
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 11:31
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 11:24
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 11:23
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 11:18
Re: the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, Timothy, 11:13
Re: "The Nature of Mass", Sam Wormley, 11:09
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, tj Frazir, 11:09
Re: Link between single particle states and full wavefunction?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:07
Fosbury a Flop ???, Ken S. Tucker, 11:04
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, David Thomson, 11:00
Re: What is slowing orbits with the universe time?, tj Frazir, 11:00
Re: mimical force for morons, tj Frazir, 10:54
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:51
Re: Kramers Kroning Relations and Causality, Richard Herring, 10:46
"The Nature of Mass", Htlaeh, 10:46
doom, kstocklmeir, 10:45
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, abe . buckingham, 10:40
Re: operator trace, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:37
Re: operator trace, Puppet_Sock, 10:26
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:21
Kramers Kroning Relations and Causality, Tanja Wendt, 10:17
Re: operator trace, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:12
Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", G=EMC^2 Glazier, 10:09
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Schoenfeld, 10:05
Re: Gravitational naughtiness, Mike, 10:02
USA in the 2010s, Math Freak, 10:01
Re: Entropy is the fifth spatial dimension but only observable at cosmic scales., bz, 09:56
Re: Ptaah Conrad and Sarfatti, Richard Herring, 09:56
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:43
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Clemens W, 09:38
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 09:33
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 09:32
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 09:31
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 09:29
Re: mimical force, Steve Ralph, 09:20
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 09:07
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Schoenfeld, 08:50
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 08:49
Re: A puzzle :-), Math Freak, 08:48
Re: A puzzle :-), Math Freak, 08:45
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM fi..., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 08:42
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 08:40
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 08:39
Re: Gravitational naughtiness, Bruce Scott TOK, 08:32
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Bruce Scott TOK, 08:30
Re: operator trace, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:24
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Don1, 08:17
Re: All are waves., Autymn D. C., 08:15
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Herman Trivilino, 08:12
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Autymn D. C., 08:05
Re: mimical force, Don1, 08:05
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM fi..., gilheron, 07:29
Re: What would the ultimate manifestation of macro quantum entanglement be?, |-|erc, 07:16
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Clemens W, 06:56
Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Dr Photon, 06:45
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:28
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:23
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:21
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:17
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:12
Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Dr Photon, 06:06
Re: virtual particle interactions, Dr Photon, 05:46
Toothpick Bridge Interest?, Toothpick Bridge Master, 05:43
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 05:22
Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Sam Wormley, 05:19
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Ken Oath, 05:19
Re: virtual particle interactions, Y.Porat, 05:17
Re: virtual particle interactions, Dr Photon, 05:09
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Y.Porat, 05:04
Re: virtual particle interactions, Dr Photon, 04:54
Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", G=EMC^2 Glazier, 04:48
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier, 04:37
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM fi..., G=EMC^2 Glazier, 04:33
Re: Help with the Physics of Evaporation, Zigoteau, 03:26
Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, mmeron, 03:00
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, ytyourclothes, 02:16
Re: All are waves., Bilge, 02:09
Re: Triple Codes 5: 6-Dimensional Gauged Supergravity, OsherD, 01:45
Triple Codes 5: 6-Dimensional Gauged Supergravity, OsherD, 01:33
Entropy is the fifth spatial dimension but only observable at cosmic scales., Jeff_Relf, 01:00
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 00:59
Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Bilge, 00:57
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, Edward Green, 00:53
Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Ron Verrall, 00:46
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 00:45
Re: operator trace, Edward Green, 00:32
Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, mmeron, 00:25
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Paul Stowe, 00:14
Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem (Oops), Ron Verrall, 00:09
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 00:04
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 00:00

August 08, 2005

Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Theo J, 23:50
Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Ron Verrall, 23:46
Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, ah, 23:21
Re: Need a clue...impulse & momentum (and energy) problem, Sam Wormley, 23:05
Re: PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMO, Sam Wormley, 22:15
Dirac Medal goes to condensed matter physicists, Sam Wormley, 22:08
PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMO, ACE, 22:07
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 8 August 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley, 22:06
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Schoenfeld, 22:02
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Don1, 20:25
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, TomGee, 20:13
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Steven Gray, 19:45
Re: What would the ultimate manifestation of macro quantum entanglement be?, Proginoskes, 19:32
Re: Gravitational naughtiness, Llanzlan Klazmon, 19:26
Re: mimical force, Steve Ralph, 18:57
Re: GNU units and units.dat; Units of Measurement and Unit Conversion, Discer, 18:27
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Ken Oath, 18:19
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, PD, 17:57
Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect, Mark Fergerson, 17:47
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, PD, 17:40
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 17:35
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:31
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, p6, 17:22
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, p6, 17:17
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, TomGee, 17:08
Re: virtual particle interactions, PD, 16:59
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 16:55
Re: Gravitational naughtiness, Jan Panteltje, 16:55
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 16:55
Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?, Sam Wormley, 16:20
Re: virtual particle interactions, Sam Wormley, 16:18
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, TomGee, 16:13
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 16:11
virtual particle interactions, Dr Photon, 16:08
Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Andy Resnick, 15:50
attractive force via particle exchange - how?, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx, 15:47
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, PD, 15:45
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, Lloyd Parker, 15:41
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, PD, 15:34
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, markwh04, 15:26
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 15:21
Re: Gibbs Paradox, Andy Resnick, 15:20
Biological Convergence, Not Intelligent Design (was: New Ideas for Intelligent Design!), markwh04, 15:19
Biological Convergence, Not Intelligent Design (was: New Ideas for Intelligent Design!), markwh04, 15:17
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 15:11
Re: A puzzle :-), Maleki, 15:06
Electroweak is a Yang-Mills force (was: Is the weak force really a force?), markwh04, 15:02
Re: A puzzle :-), Maleki, 14:56
Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, Uncle Al, 14:53
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 14:46
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 14:38
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 14:35
Time is running out for Henry Haapalainen - Where is the meat?, Mike, 14:15
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Orion, 14:03
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Bruce Scott TOK, 14:02
Re: Gibbs Paradox, Matthew Lybanon, 13:58
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Bruce Scott TOK, 13:52
Re: doom, PD, 13:51
Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, T Wake, 13:50
Re: altering science writing to fit Internet and not journals; Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Mark South, 13:50
Re: mimical force, PD, 13:48
Re: sloppy writing of Georg G. Raffelt Re: altering science writing to fit Internet and not journals; Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Quantum Mirror, 13:47
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Bruce Scott TOK, 13:46
Re: this term: billion times more neutrinos than white matter Re: Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Paul Schlyter, 13:45
the greatest single flaw of the Big Bang theory, and why future generations will laugh, a_plutonium, 13:40
Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Barry in Maryland, 13:34
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 13:33
Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Dr Photon, 13:31
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, PD, 13:19
Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Uncle Al, 13:18
Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Uncle Al, 13:17
Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, Quantum Mirror, 13:15
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Androcles, 13:10
sloppy writing of Georg G. Raffelt Re: altering science writing to fit Internet and not journals; Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, a_plutonium, 13:04
Re: this term: billion times more neutrinos than white matter Re: Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Quantum Mirror, 13:04
Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, Uncle Al, 13:00
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Uncle Al, 12:58
Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?, PD, 12:54
Re: The Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 3, Uncle Al, 12:52
Humorous alternative to ID!, Quantum Mirror, 12:51
Gravitational naughtiness, Uncle Al, 12:50
Re: All are waves EL and Bulge? What about wave function collapse?, T Wake, 12:37
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 12:30
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 12:27
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Don1, 12:25
Re: mimical force, T Wake, 12:24
Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Autymn D. C., 12:17
Gibbs Paradox, Tanja Wendt, 12:14
Re: All are waves., Autymn D. C., 12:13
Re: mimical force, Clemens W, 12:06
Re: altering science writing to fit Internet and not journals; Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Edward Cherlin, 11:57
doom, kstocklmeir, 11:51
Re: doom, Richard Tobin, 11:49
Re: lantern mantles as selective surface?, Richard Herring, 11:44
Re: mimical force, Don1, 11:43
Re: All are waves., Autymn D. C., 11:42
Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect, Douglas Eagleson, 11:41
Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Math Freak, 11:30
Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Sam Wormley, 11:27
Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Schoenfeld, 11:20
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Puppet_Sock, 11:19
doom, kstocklmeir, 11:17
Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, Puppet_Sock, 11:16
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 11:14
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Bruce Scott TOK, 11:09
"Do Virtual Photons Exist?", Htlaeh, 11:07
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 11:07
Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Ian Parker, 11:03
Re: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model, newedana, 11:01
Re: A Fine Null Theory Example, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Schoenfeld, 10:57
Re: mimical force, Clemens W, 10:45
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, tgdenning, 10:31
Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Scismgenie, 10:20
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Clemens W, 10:16
Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, Quantum Mirror, 10:16
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, PD, 10:15
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Randy Poe, 10:11
Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Scismgenie, 10:09
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Schoenfeld, 09:59
Link between single particle states and full wavefunction?, Anton81, 09:58
Re: Time, AllYou!, 09:40
Re: Index To Dimensions, OsherD, 09:31
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Don1, 09:28
Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Boris Mohar, 09:27
Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Dr Photon, 09:26
Index To Dimensions, OsherD, 09:25
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 09:24
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Aug 05 Washington, DC, Andy Resnick, 09:23
Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Andy Resnick, 09:16
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Schoenfeld, 09:16
Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Bruce Scott TOK, 09:12
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Schoenfeld, 09:06
Re: Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Ian Parker, 09:05
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Autymn D. C., 08:58
Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 740 August 5, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Andy Resnick, 08:58
Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Aratzio, 08:55
Relativistic Young's slit experiment, Dr Photon, 08:54
Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, Torkel Franzen, 08:26
Re: Velocity of Electrons, Zigoteau, 08:11
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 07:41
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Aydin, 07:41
Re: Plane Crash in Sicily, Richard Herring, 07:33
Re: A Fine Null Theory Example, Richard Herring, 07:27
Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, Pyriform, 07:08
Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, ah, 07:06
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, tgdenning, 07:01
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Clemens W, 06:46
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 06:37
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 06:28
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 06:28
Re: Article: Prediction of a Composite Particle Mass, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:25
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:21
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Schoenfeld, 06:15
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 06:01
Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:59
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Bjoern Feuerbacher, 05:54
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Schoenfeld, 05:50
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Schoenfeld, 05:45
Re: mimical force, tadchem, 05:38
Re: this term: billion times more neutrinos than white matter Re: Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Paul Schlyter, 05:13
Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Anomalies, OsherD, 05:01
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Schoenfeld, 04:53
Re: Dimensions of Mass, Time, Force, and Their Perception 2: E = wLF Re-Perceived, OsherD, 04:52
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, August 08, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 04:33
Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, unamerican, 04:17
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 04:14
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 04:11
Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Anomalies, OsherD, 04:06
Re: mimical force, Steve Ralph, 03:50
Heisenberg Uncertainty Anomalies, OsherD, 03:31
New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!, Quantum Mirror, 02:30
Re: this term: billion times more neutrinos than white matter Re: Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, Quantum Mirror, 02:16
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, p6, 02:00
Re: Gravity and electricity, the softrat, 01:32
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 01:20
Re: altering science writing to fit Internet and not journals; Cosmic Abundance of Neutrinos? 10^78 or 10^148, James "Kibo" Parry, 01:15
Re: Dimensions of Mass, Time, Force, and Their Perception 2: E = wLF Re-Perceived, Scismgenie, 01:05
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 01:02
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 01:00
Using vibrations and voltage to measure the inertia of a single molecule., Jeff_Relf, 00:57
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, Y.Porat, 00:33
Re: Dramatis Personae III, western1lands, 00:29
Re: Standard force, Y.Porat, 00:16
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 00:07
Re: Standard force, Gregory L. Hansen, 00:04

August 07, 2005

Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Scismgenie, 23:47
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Schoenfeld, 23:38
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 23:35
Re: operator trace, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:32
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Michael Moroney, 23:12
Re: Standard force, Sam Wormley, 23:10
Re: operator trace, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:06
Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Aratzio, 22:48
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 22:39
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 22:36
Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, ah, 22:34
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 22:34
Re: All are waves EL and Bulge? What about wave function collapse?, the softrat, 22:32
Re: Daniel Nocera of MIT good at details but drops the ball on the big picture Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, nospam, 21:48
Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 2, Douglas Eagleson, 21:46
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, tgdenning, 20:18
Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 2, Robert Kolker, 20:13
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Jim Black, 20:12
Re: mimical force, macromitch, 20:06
Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 2, Uncle Al, 20:05
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, macromitch, 20:04
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 2, Douglas Eagleson, 19:56
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 19:45
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 19:44
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, kenseto, 19:39
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, MosS, 19:23
Re: operator trace, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 19:21
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 19:20
Re: operator trace, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:12
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Jim Black, 19:11
Re: operator trace, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:10
Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Cujo DeSockpuppet, 19:06
Re: What would the ultimate manifestation of macro quantum entanglement be?, Proginoskes, 19:03
Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, Edward Green, 19:00
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 18:55
Re: mimical force, T Wake, 18:55
Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Aratzio, 18:54
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 18:50
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, tgdenning, 18:46
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 18:46
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Tom Roberts, 18:46
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 18:42
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Tom Roberts, 18:40
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Tom Roberts, 18:37
Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, ah, 18:33
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Tom Roberts, 18:32
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 18:22
Re: operator trace, Edward Green, 18:21
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 18:18
Re: operator trace, Edward Green, 18:15
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, Robert Karl Stonjek, 18:08
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 18:03
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 17:55
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, Bill Hobba, 17:53
Re: mimical force, macromitch, 17:52
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 17:51
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, msadkins04, 17:51
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, macromitch, 17:45
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 17:37
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, macromitch, 17:33
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 17:33
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 17:30
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, MosS, 17:29
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 17:25
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, T Wake, 17:23
Re: All are waves EL and Bulge? What about wave function collapse?, T Wake, 17:20
Re: All are waves EL and Bulge? What about wave function collapse?, macromitch, 16:43
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, macromitch, 16:34
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, macromitch, 16:31
Re: operator trace, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:25
Re: Velocity of Electrons, skeptic, 16:17
Re: No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, Mike, 16:08
Re: Is the weak force really a force?, Henry Haapalainen, 16:00
Re: In Apr 2001 I contacted an office in WTC..., fbonsignore, 15:59
Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Uncle Al, 15:59
Re: THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT IS AN ILLUSION, Sam Wormley, 15:38
THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT IS AN ILLUSION, ACE, 15:28
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Jim Black, 15:19
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Art Deco, 15:11
supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, a_plutonium, 15:07
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, Autymn D. C., 15:06
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, Autymn D. C., 14:49
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 14:37
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, tnlockyer@xxxxxxx, 14:37
Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Sam Wormley, 14:31
Re: mimical force, Sam Wormley, 14:27
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 14:20
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Steven Gray, 14:14
Re: Standard force, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
A Philosophical Physicist's Statement, Douglas Eagleson, 13:35
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, kenseto, 13:29
Re: No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, TomGee, 13:26
Re: mimical force, T Wake, 13:18
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, TomGee, 13:16
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, TomGee, 13:08
Re: No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, Mike, 13:08
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, MosS, 13:03
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, nightbat, 13:03
Re: mimical force, Steve Ralph, 13:02
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, T Wake, 13:01
Re: mimical force, T Wake, 13:00
Re: Multiplicative (Two Variable) Noise Yields 2-Phases (Cancer vs Immune), OsherD, 12:59
Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again., John Sefton, 12:59
Multiplicative (Two Variable) Noise Yields 2-Phases (Cancer vs Immune), OsherD, 12:55
Re: No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, John Sefton, 12:37
Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 11:55
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:50
Re: I have to be a GENIUS to be hated so much but they cannot admit a mistake, fbonsignore, 11:48
Re: mimical force, Aydin, 11:42
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, john_ramsden, 11:35
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, tj Frazir, 11:34
Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Aratzio, 11:32
Re: mimical force, Don1, 11:28
Re: mimical force, Don1, 11:26
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, T Wake, 11:22
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, Jim Spriggs, 11:19
Re: TJ atoms push themselves change orbit change mass, T Wake, 11:19
Re: Standard force, T Wake, 11:18
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:13
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, john_ramsden, 11:08
Re: Standard force, tj Frazir, 11:04
Re: operator trace, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:00
Re: mimical force, T Wake, 10:52
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, T Wake, 10:51
Re: Dimensions of Mass, Time, Force, and Their Perception 2: E = wLF Re-Perceived, OsherD, 10:50
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, T Wake, 10:49
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, john_ramsden, 10:48
Re: Time, space DUMBASSES, T Wake, 10:48
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, T Wake, 10:47
Re: GOD=G_uv LIFE AFTER DEATH, T Wake, 10:45
Re: TJ atoms push themselves change orbit change mass, tj Frazir, 10:44
Re: No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, TomGee, 10:36
Re: Standard force, Don1, 10:34
Re: mimical force, Steve Ralph, 10:33
mimical force, Don1, 10:26
Dimensions of Mass, Time, Force, and Their Perception 2: E = wLF Re-Perceived, OsherD, 10:20
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, TomGee, 10:16
"Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Einsteinhoax, 10:15
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, tj Frazir, 10:13
Re: Standard force, Sam Wormley, 09:57
Re: No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, john_ramsden, 09:55
Re: Time, space DUMBASSES, tj Frazir, 09:53
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, tj Frazir, 09:51
Re: Standard force, T Wake, 09:49
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, tj Frazir, 09:48
Re: GOD=G_uv LIFE AFTER DEATH, J. Horta, 09:44
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, T Wake, 09:35
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, tgdenning, 09:30
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, James Toupin, 09:18
Re: Standard force, Don1, 09:14
Re: Reality of black holes, jem, 09:11
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, T Wake, 09:09
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, T Wake, 09:08
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, T Wake, 09:07
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, T Wake, 09:06
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, T Wake, 09:06
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, T Wake, 09:06
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, T Wake, 08:55
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, T Wake, 08:54
Re: All are waves EL and Bulge? What about wave function collapse?, T Wake, 08:54
Re: Standard force, Don1, 08:52
Re: Standard force, Don1, 08:44
Re: Velocity of Electrons, Aydin, 08:33
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Sam Wormley, 08:26
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 08:04
No Room for INTELLIGENT DESIGN in Big Bang Theory -, Ed Conrad, 07:43
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 07:34
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 07:10
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 07:03
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, the softrat, 06:47
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 06:45
Re: All are waves EL and Bulge? What about wave function collapse?, the softrat, 06:42
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, George Dishman, 06:35
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:18
Daniel Nocera of MIT good at details but drops the ball on the big picture Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, a_plutonium, 06:17
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Martin Hogbin, 05:57
Re: All are waves EL and Bulge? What about wave function collapse?, Bilge, 05:46
Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges, 05:41
Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, a_plutonium, 05:29
Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, a_plutonium, 05:17
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, a_plutonium, 05:10
Re: editing Wikipedia entry of Archimedes Plutonium, a_plutonium, 04:48
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, Y.Porat, 04:45
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, jmfbahciv, 04:38
Re: Dimensions of Mass, Time, Force, and Their Perception, OsherD, 04:30
Re: What would the ultimate manifestation of macro quantum entanglement be?, |-|erc, 04:22
Re: What is expanding with the universe?, Bill Hobba, 04:11
Dimensions of Mass, Time, Force, and Their Perception, OsherD, 04:10
What is expanding with the universe?, MosS, 03:55
Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?, Mitchell Jones, 03:15
Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Cujo DeSockpuppet, 03:10
Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Jim Black, 01:43
All are waves? What about wave function collapse?, Nick, 01:16
Dimensions move., Nick, 01:14
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, Nick, 01:08
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Nick, 01:04
Re: A puzzle :-), Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 01:03
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, the softrat, 00:47
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, the softrat, 00:44
Re: All are waves EL and Bulge? What about wave function collapse?, Nick, 00:43
Re: All are waves EL and Bulge? What about wave function collapse?, the softrat, 00:40
Re: Standard force, Aydin, 00:35
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, Y.Porat, 00:35
Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", the softrat, 00:32
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, Nick, 00:23
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, night dalits, 00:12
Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Aydin, 00:07
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, tj Frazir, 00:03
Re: A Fine Null Theory Example, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00

August 06, 2005

Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, tj Frazir, 23:57
Re: Standard force, Aydin, 23:52
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, tj Frazir, 23:48
Re: Standard force, Nutbuster, 23:26
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, vanep, 23:20
Re: All are waves EL and Bulge? What about wave function collapse?, Nick, 23:01
Velocity of Electrons, skeptic, 22:51
Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Aratzio, 22:50
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, Nick, 22:48
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, Nick, 22:45
Re: Teleportation to Transportation, Autymn D. C., 22:16
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, tj Frazir, 22:10
Re: computers have only 1/2 life of my Toyota pickup, deowll, 22:10
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, Bill Hobba, 22:09
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, T Wake, 21:50
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, Bill Hobba, 21:41
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, T Wake, 21:39
Re: Standard force, Sam Wormley, 21:37
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, Bill Hobba, 21:37
Re: THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT IS AN ILLUSION, Sam Wormley, 21:35
Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it, Autymn D. C., 21:34
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, T Wake, 21:34
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, T Wake, 21:33
Standard force, Don1, 21:31
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, vanep, 21:28
Re: What would the ultimate manifestation of macro quantum entanglement be?, Autymn D. C., 21:27
Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Autymn D. C., 21:21
Re: Physicists have built a lens that can image nano-scale objects using visible light, Edward Green, 21:02
Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?, Nutbuster, 20:55
Re: NOMINATION:Re: Attn: FNVW - K0TM Nomination for the Boy er, Archie Leach, 20:32
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, Nutbuster, 20:30
Re: I have to be a GENIUS to be hated so much but they cannot admit a mistake, Edward Green, 20:28
Re: OWLS is not equal to c, Henri Wilson, 20:23
Re: Stepp is a disgusting loser, Autymn D. C., 20:21
Re: Time, Sue..., 20:13
Re: Time, TomGee, 20:01
Re: I have to be a GENIUS to be hated so much but they cannot admit a mistake, fbonsignore, 19:52
Re: A Fine Null Theory Example, RichD, 19:48
Re: Time, Sue..., 19:44
Re: All are waves., Bill Hobba, 19:39
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, tj Frazir, 19:24
Re: Time, TomGee, 19:18
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Autymn D. C., 18:53
Re: All are waves., Bill Hobba, 18:52
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, greatbooksclassics, 18:49
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, Nutbuster, 18:41
Re: Spin Foam in Geometric Analogy, Uncle Al, 18:39
Re: A Fine Null Theory Example, Uncle Al, 18:38
Re: Time, Autymn D. C., 18:30
Re: All are waves., Bilge, 18:28
Re: A Bare Analogy, Douglas Eagleson, 18:22
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Androcles, 18:19
Spin Foam in Geometric Analogy, Douglas Eagleson, 18:14
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Androcles, 18:13
A Fine Null Theory Example, Douglas Eagleson, 18:12
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Ken S. Tucker, 18:10
Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B, tj Frazir, 18:09
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, tj Frazir, 18:01
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, Robert Karl Stonjek, 17:56
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, David Thomson, 17:56
Re: Reality of black holes, Autymn D. C., 17:53
Re: Article: EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT, Robert Karl Stonjek, 17:51
Re: Time Papers By Nation 2: More on the Cold War and Hot War, persian ram, 17:50
Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically, Autymn D. C., 17:50
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, David Thomson, 17:49
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Sue..., 17:27
Re: TJ atoms push themselves? UFO flys away, Nick, 17:16
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Don1, 17:14
Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question, Richard Tobin, 17:14
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, Nick, 17:09
Re: A Bare Analogy, Uncle Al, 17:09
Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v, Jan Panteltje, 17:06
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Ken S. Tucker, 17:03
A Bare Analogy, Douglas Eagleson, 17:02
Re: operator trace, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:00
Time Papers By Nation 2: More on the Cold War and Hot War, OsherD, 16:51
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Sue..., 16:50
Article: Prediction of a Composite Particle Mass, Robert Karl Stonjek, 16:44
Article: On the First Generation of Stars, Robert Karl Stonjek, 16:42
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Ken S. Tucker, 16:41
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, vanep, 16:39
Re: Why doesn't SI use newtons?, Double-A, 16:30
Re: A Quantum Theory, Defined in Detonation Reaction Terms, Douglas Eagleson, 16:21
Bjoern BBT flops yet again., Ken S. Tucker, 16:19
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Gregory L. Hansen, 16:18
Re: A Quantum Theory, Defined in Detonation Reaction Terms, Uncle Al, 15:54
Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Uncle Al, 15:52
Re: Feynman Double slit experiment and others, Uncle Al, 15:45
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, Captain Ranger McCoy, 15:44
Re: Playing with Ruth-Aaron Pairs, Uncle Al, 15:42
Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, Uncle Al, 15:35
Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?, Orion, 15:15
Re: Einstein had to survive his education, Bilge, 15:13
Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
Re: MOV Lightning Protection In A Residence ?, John Popelish, 14:47
Re: The New York Times Reports: Leading String Theorists Admit String Theory is a Government-Funded Hoax--A Faith Based Initiative With No Science To show For It. Moving Dimesnion Theory Will Replace It, vanep, 14:45<