|
|
"fresh~horses" <fresh~horses@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1127483256.348958.221930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Howard McCollister wrote:
>> "fresh~horses" <fresh~horses@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1127441989.660959.282120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > I'm going to read this over, think about it carefully, and ponder on
>> > how I can tell you why I disagree with you, in as unemotional a way as
>> > possible. However, if I think *that* isn't possible...
>> >
>>
>> Hey Zee, you don't need to think about it - your arguments will certainly
>> be
>> contained within this article:
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/22/business/22devices.html?pagewanted=4
>>
>> HMc
>
>
>
> Yes, some of my arguments may be there.
>
> I have thought about it Howard. From your perspective now too, but for
> some time as one who carries a device deployed in me in off-label use
> by a surgeon who thought there was no need to ask my permission or tell
> me I was part of an experiment.
>
|
|