| Subject: | Re: WARNING: Industry is Blogging These NewsGroups to Maintain Their Monopolies |
|---|---|
| From: | "Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" |
| Date: | 23 Sep 2005 18:09:37 -0700 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.med, misc.health.alternative, misc.kids, uk.people.health, talk.politics.medicine |
PeterB wrote: > I so appreciate your generosity. I didn't retire from the debate about > vaccine, though. The readers were told in item 3 of my "warning" post > that pharma bloggers work hard to have the last word, and so you did. > There is only so much time available to repeat oneself and show that > cathy was struggling to come up with shreds of evidence in defense of > vaccine. My call for randomized, double-blind, long-term studies > proving the effectiveness of vaccine went unasnwered, by you, cathy, or > anyone else. I understand, of course. There are no such studies. COMMENT: Define "long-term." SBH |
| Previous by Date: | Re: WARNING: Industry is Blogging These NewsGroups to Maintain Their Monopolies, cathyb |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: viruses develop resistance to flu drugs, (PeteCresswell) |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: WARNING: Industry is Blogging These NewsGroups to Maintain Their Monopolies, cathyb |
| Next by Thread: | Re: WARNING: Industry is Blogging These NewsGroups to Maintain Their Monopolies, PeterB |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |