|
|
"Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" <sbharris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1126210172.592341.124260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hawki63@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> hmmm...I suppose this could go to auto
>> manufacturing...furniture...clothes...etc
>>
>> how many are ACTUALLY unique??
>>
>> they are ALL "me too"
>>
>> but then...THAT is a different issue..
>>
>> yeah right
>
>
> COMMENT:
>
> I seem to remember trying this argument on Zee and getting the response
> that me-too autos didn't count because drugs are a different
> commodity-- one which saves lives.
>
> Of course, that was before she got off on the OTHER socialist idea that
> what's breaking the bank is really "life-style" drugs, of the sort that
> don't save impoverished Africans. So THOSE really are more like autos.
>
> Okay, let us stipulate the real economic pharm problem is really
> "me-too lifestyle drugs." :) But how THESE differ from luxury
> transportation, escapes me. Unless your doofus government is
> constructed so that it's obligated to pay for them.
>
> Then--- everybody waits in line for their BMW. Remind you of anyplace?
>
> SBH
>
yep....couldn't resist jumping on that insane post...
"me too" is the way the marketing world runs...if not...we would have ONE
brand of car,,jeans,,soda..etc etc..
deciding ONLY drugs that are similar are the bad guys...is comparable to
calling taking out ovaries "castration"
|
|