sci.math (date)
May 31, 2009
- Re: Seeking Factual Feedback, Thanks!, Martin Musatov, 13:49
- Re: Seeking Factual Feedback, Thanks!, Martin Musatov, 13:36
- Re: Seeking Factual Feedback, Thanks!, Martin Musatov, 13:31
- Re: Seeking Factual Feedback, Thanks!, Richard Heathfield, 13:15
- Re: Seeking Factual Feedback, Thanks!, Martin Michael Musatov, 12:01
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Martin Michael Musatov, 01:31
May 29, 2009
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Martin Musatov, 23:48
- Re: Seeking Factual Feedback, Thanks!, Richard Heathfield, 23:22
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Joshua Cranmer, 18:31
- Re: Seeking Factual Feedback, Thanks!, Martin Musatov, 18:20
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Denis Feldmann, 12:18
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Martin Musatov, 11:02
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Martin Musatov, 10:58
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Frederick Williams, 10:54
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), H. J. Sander Bruggink, 05:23
- Re: Seeking Factual Feedback, Thanks!, Richard Heathfield, 02:14
- Proposition if Vertical Processing, Martin Michael Musatov, 01:03
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Martin Michael Musatov, 00:11
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Martin Michael Musatov, 00:08
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Marshall, 00:02
May 28, 2009
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Martin Michael Musatov, 23:47
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Martin Michael Musatov, 23:43
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Marshall, 21:15
- Re: Seeking Factual Feedback, Thanks!, Martin Michael Musatov, 20:43
- Re: Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Joshua Cranmer, 20:31
- Prodigy Proves NP=P solves (TSP), Martin Musatov, 20:04
- Re: An exact simplification challenge - 91 (eerie PolyGamma), clicliclic, 12:47
May 27, 2009
- Re: An exact simplification challenge - 91 (eerie PolyGamma), Martin Musatov, 23:36
- Re: An exact simplification challenge - 91 (eerie PolyGamma), Nasser Abbasi, 21:52
- Re: Seeking Factual Feedback, Thanks!, Richard Heathfield, 21:06
- Re: Seeking Factual Feedback, Thanks!, Martin Michael Musatov, 19:48
- Re: Seeking Factual Feedback, Thanks!, Joshua Cranmer, 19:34
- New bug in Maple 13 was Re: Difficulty in an integral, Vladimir Bondarenko, 16:50
- Re: Invertibility and irreversibility, Martin Musatov, 12:51
- Re: Invertibility and irreversibility, Martin Musatov, 12:47
- Invertibility and irreversibility, Bluuuue Rajah, 11:19
- www.niketrade08.cn ) Air Jordans 14 shoes cheap wholesaler, yijeans10, 04:20
- www.niketrade08.cn ) Ed hardy Hat cheap wholesaler, yijeans10, 04:18
May 23, 2009
- Re: Cut and Dry: P==NP QED, Martin Musatov, 12:35
- Re: Cut and Dry: P==NP QED, Martin Musatov, 12:21
- Re: Cut and Dry: P==NP QED, Martin Musatov, 12:17
- Re: Cut and Dry: P==NP QED, Joshua Cranmer, 11:20
- Re: Cut and Dry: P==NP QED, Zirui, 09:56
- Cut and Dry: P==NP QED, Martin Michael Musatov, 06:54
May 18, 2009
- Re: Is there more bugs in Wolfram Alpha than in Mathematica 7 itself?, Herman Rubin, 13:58
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stamble over the 1st one?, Ilmari Karonen, 13:46
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stamble over the 1st one?, David N. Williams, 13:39
- Re: Is there more bugs in Wolfram Alpha than in Mathematica 7 itself?, Vladimir Marjanović, 12:34
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stamble over the 1st one?, Vladimir Marjanović, 12:09
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stamble over the 1st one?, Dave, 06:46
May 16, 2009
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stamble over the 1st one?, Vladimir Bondarenko, 13:03
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stamble over the 1st one?, clicliclic, 12:14
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stumble over the 1st one?, Vladimir Bondarenko, 12:11
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stamble over the 1st one?, Vladimir Bondarenko, 12:09
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stumble over the 1st one?, VMCM1905, 12:05
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stumble over the 1st one?, Vladimir Bondarenko, 10:57
- Is there more bugs in Wolfram Alpha than in Mathematica 7 itself?, Vladimir Bondarenko, 10:46
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stamble over the 1st one?, Vladimir Bondarenko, 10:40
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stamble over the 1st one?, Nasser Abbasi, 04:01
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stamble over the 1st one?, Vladimir Bondarenko, 03:14
- Re: Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stamble over the 1st one?, Nasser Abbasi, 02:26
- Wolfram Alpha bugs: How much time do you need to stamble over the 1st one?, Vladimir Bondarenko, 02:03
May 12, 2009
- Re: origin of n5 lattice --- where in Dedekind's 1900 paper?, Daniel J. Greenhoe, 22:41
- Re: origin of n5 lattice --- where in Dedekind's 1900 paper?, Daniel J. Greenhoe, 21:41
- Re: origin of n5 lattice --- where in Dedekind's 1900 paper?, clicliclic, 12:43
- Re: origin of n5 lattice --- where in Dedekind's 1900 paper?, G. A. Edgar, 11:22
- Re: origin of n5 lattice --- where in Dedekind's 1900 paper?, Daniel J. Greenhoe, 10:15
- Re: origin of n5 lattice --- where in Dedekind's 1900 paper?, clicliclic, 05:49
Privacy Policy