sci.math (thread)
a few more general GRE math problems,
john,
2006/12/31
- Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Daniel Mayost, 2006/12/31
- Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Nick, 2006/12/31
- Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Dana DeLouis, 2006/12/31
- Re: a few more general GRE math problems, pauldepstein, 2006/12/31
- Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Cary, 2006/12/31
- Re: a few more general GRE math problems, David T. Ashley, 2006/12/31
Interesting Math Books?,
C,
2006/12/30
- Re: Interesting Math Books?, David T. Ashley, 2006/12/31
- Re: Interesting Math Books?, Ivar Rosquist, 2006/12/31
- Re: Interesting Math Books?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 2006/12/31
- Re: Interesting Math Books?, Kira Yamato, 2006/12/31
- Re: Interesting Math Books?, Cary, 2006/12/31
- Re: Interesting Math Books?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/31
- Re: Interesting Math Books?, David Bernier, 2006/12/31
- Re: Interesting Math Books?, Nick, 2006/12/31
- Re: Interesting Math Books?, John Coleman, 2006/12/31
- Re: Interesting Math Books?, mathedman, 2006/12/31
JSH: You're screwing Usenet too,
jstevh,
2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, sg552, 2006/12/30
- Re: You're screwing Usenet too, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Randy Poe, 2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Wayne Brown, 2006/12/31
- Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Jonathan Hoyle, 2006/12/31
- Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Tom S, 2006/12/31
- Re: You're screwing Usenet too, nospam, 2006/12/31
- Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/31
- Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Rupert, 2006/12/31
- Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, junoexpress, 2006/12/31
- Re: You're screwing Usenet too, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/31
- Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, gjedwards, 2006/12/31
JSH: It IS fraud,
jstevh,
2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: It IS fraud, jankrihau, 2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: It IS fraud, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: It IS fraud, hagman, 2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Randy Poe, 2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Jim Ferry, 2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Gonçalo Rodrigues, 2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Rupert, 2006/12/31
JSH: Counting prime numbers,
jstevh,
2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, sg552, 2006/12/30
- Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, Tim Peters, 2006/12/31
- Re: Counting prime numbers, nospam, 2006/12/31
- Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, Rupert, 2006/12/31
Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6,
Marc,
2006/12/30
- Re: Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, José Carlos Santos, 2006/12/30
- Re: Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, junoexpress, 2006/12/30
a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?,
Leonard M. Wapner,
2006/12/29
- Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, PhysicsHowie, 2006/12/29
- [] a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, William Elliot, 2006/12/29
- Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David Bernier, 2006/12/29
- Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Kira Yamato, 2006/12/29
- Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Leonard M. Wapner, 2006/12/29
ambiguous names?,
zxcv_890,
2006/12/28
- Re: ambiguous names?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/28
- Re: ambiguous names?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/12/28
- Re: ambiguous names?, Nick, 2006/12/28
- Re: ambiguous names?, Dave L. Renfro, 2006/12/28
- Re: ambiguous names?, hagman, 2006/12/28
- Re: ambiguous names?, G . Frege, 2006/12/29
- Re: ambiguous names?, Proginoskes, 2006/12/29
PI,
Charlie Johnson,
2006/12/27
- Re: PI, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/27
- Message not available
- Re: PI, Rob Johnson, 2006/12/27
- Re: PI, Ken Pledger, 2006/12/28
- Re: PI, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/12/27
- Re: PI, Cary, 2006/12/27
- Re: PI, The World Wide Wade, 2006/12/27
- Re: PI, Saurav, 2006/12/27
- Re: PI, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/27
Is continuum completely filled up?,
ooo,
2006/12/27
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 2006/12/27
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Virgil, 2006/12/27
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, David Marcus, 2006/12/27
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, William Elliot, 2006/12/27
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 2006/12/27
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Randy Poe, 2006/12/27
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 2006/12/27
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Randy Poe, 2006/12/27
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 2006/12/28
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 2006/12/28
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 2006/12/28
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 2006/12/30
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 2006/12/30
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 2006/12/30
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 2006/12/30
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 2006/12/31
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 2006/12/31
- Message not available
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, kunzmilan, 2006/12/27
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, mathedman, 2006/12/27
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/27
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, guenther vonKnakspot, 2006/12/28
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Saurav, 2006/12/30
- Message not available
Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?,
Kamjah Kogumah,
2006/12/26
- Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro, 2006/12/26
- Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Kira Yamato, 2006/12/26
- Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro, 2006/12/26
- Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Gonçalo Rodrigues, 2006/12/26
- Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/26
- Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro, 2006/12/26
- Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 2006/12/26
Uncountable numbers?,
Andrew Usher,
2006/12/26
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/12/26
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, Virgil, 2006/12/26
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, Gc, 2006/12/26
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/26
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, Gc, 2006/12/27
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, Virgil, 2006/12/27
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/27
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, saurav1b, 2006/12/27
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/27
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, Lee Rudolph, 2006/12/27
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/27
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, Dave Seaman, 2006/12/28
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/28
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, Dave Seaman, 2006/12/28
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, Saurav, 2006/12/28
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/28
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, Saurav, 2006/12/28
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/26
- Re: Uncountable numbers?, Randy Poe, 2006/12/26
Proof by contradiction,
Andrew Usher,
2006/12/26
- Re: Proof by contradiction, N. Silver, 2006/12/26
- Re: Proof by contradiction, William Elliot, 2006/12/26
- Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil, 2006/12/26
- Re: Proof by contradiction, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/12/26
- Re: Proof by contradiction, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/26
- Re: Proof by contradiction, fernando revilla, 2006/12/26
- Re: Proof by contradiction, Randy Poe, 2006/12/26
- Re: Proof by contradiction, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 2006/12/26
- Re: Proof by contradiction, Nick, 2006/12/27
\,
John Jones,
2006/12/25
n (n + 1),
Prawt,
2006/12/25
- Re: n (n + 1), fernando revilla, 2006/12/25
- Re: n (n + 1), fernando revilla, 2006/12/25
- Re: n (n + 1), Dik T. Winter, 2006/12/26
- Re: n (n + 1), Bob Kolker, 2006/12/26
- Re: n (n + 1), bill, 2006/12/26
phip,
John Jones,
2006/12/25
phep,
John Jones,
2006/12/25
World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid,
a_plutonium,
2006/12/25
- Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, Proginoskes, 2006/12/25
- Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, pierrecharland, 2006/12/25
- correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes reductio ad absurdum, a_plutonium, 2006/12/25
- Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes reductio ad absurdum, Dik T. Winter, 2006/12/26
- Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes reductio ad absurdum, a_plutonium, 2006/12/26
- Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes reductio ad absurdum, Tonico, 2006/12/26
- Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes reductio ad absurdum, a_plutonium, 2006/12/26
- how Euclid Infinitude of Primes Indirect Method leads to a proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 2006/12/26
- Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes reductio ad absurdum, sttscitrans, 2006/12/26
- proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes; applying Math Induction on Dik Winter's format, a_plutonium, 2006/12/26
- Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes; applying Math Induction on Dik Winter's format, a_plutonium, 2006/12/26
- Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes; applying Math Induction on Dik Winter's format, Dik T. Winter, 2006/12/27
- satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, a_plutonium, 2006/12/27
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Dik T. Winter, 2006/12/27
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Proginoskes, 2006/12/27
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Dik T. Winter, 2006/12/28
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, a_plutonium, 2006/12/27
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Proginoskes, 2006/12/27
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Proginoskes, 2006/12/28
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Dik T. Winter, 2006/12/28
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, a_plutonium, 2006/12/28
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Proginoskes, 2006/12/28
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Dik T. Winter, 2006/12/29
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Proginoskes, 2006/12/29
- setting the proper scope on the Chebychev Theorem to include composites of 2 and only 2 prime factors, a_plutonium, 2006/12/29
- Dik, what is the largest know twin-primes? Re: setting the proper scope on the Chebychev Theorem, a_plutonium, 2006/12/29
- Re: Dik, what is the largest know twin-primes? Re: setting the proper scope on the Chebychev Theorem, N. Silver, 2006/12/29
- the neighboring primes surrounding one of these far-out Twin Primes, could evaluate whether Twin Primes are a finite set, a_plutonium, 2006/12/29
- Re: the neighboring primes surrounding one of these far-out Twin Primes, could evaluate whether Twin Primes are a finite set, Proginoskes, 2006/12/29
- Re: setting the proper scope on the Chebychev Theorem to include composites of 2 and only 2 prime factors, a_plutonium, 2006/12/29
- setting the scope of Chebychev Theorem inbetween that of K->2K and that of K->K^2 indicates that Twin Primes are FINITE, a_plutonium, 2006/12/29
- Re: setting the scope of Chebychev Theorem inbetween that of K->2K and that of K->K^2 indicates that Twin Primes are FINITE, a_plutonium, 2006/12/29
- What would a last Twin Prime possibly be? And how P-adics = Natural Numbers looks at this, a_plutonium, 2006/12/29
- Re: What would a last Twin Prime possibly be? And how P-adics = Natural Numbers looks at this, Nam Nguyen, 2006/12/30
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 2006/12/31
- troublespot appearing Re: Proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 2006/12/31
- Told you so. Was: Re: troublespot appearing Re: Proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes, Proginoskes, 2006/12/31
- Re: Told you so. Was: Re: troublespot appearing Re: Proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 2006/12/31
- Proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; new method in Number theory, a_plutonium, 2006/12/31
- explaining why Regular Primes was easy to prove, yet Twin impossible Re: Proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; new method in Number theory, a_plutonium, 2006/12/31
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, David Marcus, 2006/12/27
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, a_plutonium, 2006/12/27
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Proginoskes, 2006/12/27
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, David Marcus, 2006/12/27
- the distribution density of twin, quad, hex, octo, deca primes, a_plutonium, 2006/12/28
- 22 hex-primes in interval 1-200 Re: the distribution density of twin, quad, hex, octo, deca primes22, a_plutonium, 2006/12/28
- Re: 22 hex-primes in interval 1-200 Re: the distribution density of twin, quad, hex, octo, deca primes22, hagman, 2006/12/28
- how all metric primes (twin, quad, hex, etc) could be finite sets, a_plutonium, 2006/12/28
- Re: how all metric primes (twin, quad, hex, etc) could be finite sets, a_plutonium, 2006/12/28
- Re: how all metric primes (twin, quad, hex, etc) could be finite sets, Proginoskes, 2006/12/29
- AP's "special composites" might work: Was: Re: how all metric primes (twin, quad, hex, etc) could be finite sets, Proginoskes, 2006/12/29
- possible proof of the Infinitude of Twin primes, quad-primes, hex-primes etcetera, a_plutonium, 2006/12/28
- Re: possible proof of the Infinitude of Twin primes, quad-primes, hex-primes etcetera, a_plutonium, 2006/12/28
- Re: 22 hex-primes in interval 1-200 Re: the distribution density of twin, quad, hex, octo, deca primes22, Gerard Schildberger, 2006/12/28
- if I cannot get Chebychev theorem to work on a proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes consider them as finite, a_plutonium, 2006/12/28
- why there are 22 hex primes in the 1-200 interval; these SPECIAL COMPOSITES and why 140s has only one prime 149, a_plutonium, 2006/12/30
- Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, hagman, 2006/12/27
- Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 2006/12/27
- Re: Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, David Marcus, 2006/12/27
- Re: Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 2006/12/27
- Re: Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, David Marcus, 2006/12/27
- Re: Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 2006/12/27
- AP admits he's doing fake proofs: Was: Re: Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, Proginoskes, 2006/12/27
- Re: Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, David Marcus, 2006/12/27
- Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes has a Indirect Method but Direct Method is unattainable, a_plutonium, 2006/12/27
- Re: Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes has a Indirect Method but Direct Method is unattainable, a_plutonium, 2006/12/27
- Re: Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes has a Indirect Method but Direct Method is unattainable, a_plutonium, 2006/12/27
- Re: Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes has a Indirect Method but Direct Method is unattainable, hagman, 2006/12/27
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, Proginoskes, 2006/12/26
- Message not available
JSH: Dumb as rocks,
jstevh,
2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Dumb as rocks, jshsucks, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Dumb as rocks, D.Michael, 2006/12/24
- Re: Dumb as rocks, N. Silver, 2006/12/24
- Re: Dumb as rocks, louis, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Dumb as rocks, Victor Eijkhout, 2006/12/25
- Re: Dumb as rocks, Karenia Brevis, 2006/12/26
- Re: JSH: Dumb as rocks, Wayne Brown, 2006/12/28
JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary,
jstevh,
2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, jshsucks, 2006/12/24
- Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, louis, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, sg552, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, Rupert, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, BaldinPramer, 2006/12/25
JSH: Operational instructions versus numbers,
jstevh,
2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Operational instructions versus numbers, Lord Protector, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Operational instructions versus numbers, Lord Protector, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: TurdVision 101 Operational instructions versus numbers, louis, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Operational instructions versus numbers, Proginoskes, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Operational instructions versus numbers, litsohate, 2006/12/27
video,
Mathematician,
2006/12/24
JSH: Perspective is weird,
jstevh,
2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Red, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Red, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Red, 2006/12/24
- Re: Perspective is weird, louis, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Rupert, 2006/12/25
JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility,
jstevh,
2006/12/24
- Re: Reasoning behind the hostility, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/24
- Re: Reasoning behind the hostility, Virgil, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Tim Peters, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Red, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Tim Peters, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, N. Silver, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, louis, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, sg552, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, sg552, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jshsucks, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jshsucks, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Rupert, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/26
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Rupert, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Tim Peters, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Dave Rosoff, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, N. Silver, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Red, 2006/12/26
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Gib Bogle, 2006/12/26
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/26
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/12/26
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, sg552, 2006/12/26
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 2006/12/26
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/26
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Proginoskes, 2006/12/26
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 2006/12/26
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Michael Press, 2006/12/27
- Message not available
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, N. Silver, 2006/12/27
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 2006/12/27
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Gib Bogle, 2006/12/27
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Proginoskes, 2006/12/27
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Michael Press, 2006/12/27
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 2006/12/27
- Message not available
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Michael Press, 2006/12/27
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Proginoskes, 2006/12/28
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Rupert, 2006/12/26
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, N. Silver, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Tim Peters, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, David Bernier, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, willo_thewisp, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, BaldinPramer, 2006/12/25
Rational/Irrational Numbers,
alok bakshi,
2006/12/23
- Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot, 2006/12/23
- Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, kilian heckrodt, 2006/12/23
- Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, fishfry, 2006/12/23
- Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, G . Frege, 2006/12/23
- Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Proginoskes, 2006/12/23
- Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, fernando revilla, 2006/12/23
- Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, christian.bau, 2006/12/23
- Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Saurav, 2006/12/24
- Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Reef Fish, 2006/12/24
- Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, rich burge, 2006/12/28
Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?,
Bob Kolker,
2006/12/22
- Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/12/22
- Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, dl, 2006/12/22
- Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/22
- Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, The Thing, 2006/12/23
- Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/23
- Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, kilian heckrodt, 2006/12/23
- Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, danielmryan, 2006/12/23
- Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/12/24
- Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Gottfried Helms, 2006/12/28
Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail.,
huangxienchen,
2006/12/22
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/22
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 2006/12/23
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 2006/12/23
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/23
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/23
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., junoexpress, 2006/12/23
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 2006/12/23
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., sg552, 2006/12/23
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 2006/12/23
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 2006/12/23
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 2006/12/24
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 2006/12/24
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 2006/12/24
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 2006/12/24
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 2006/12/24
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 2006/12/24
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 2006/12/25
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 2006/12/25
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 2006/12/25
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 2006/12/25
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 2006/12/25
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 2006/12/25
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 2006/12/25
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 2006/12/26
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., junoexpress, 2006/12/23
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., sg552, 2006/12/23
- Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 2006/12/23
another GRE math exercise problem,
john,
2006/12/21
- Re: another GRE math exercise problem, hagman, 2006/12/21
- Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Tim Peters, 2006/12/21
- Re: another GRE math exercise problem, johnjo, 2006/12/21
- Re: another GRE math exercise problem, john, 2006/12/21
- Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/21
- Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Randy Poe, 2006/12/21
- Re: another GRE math exercise problem, pauldepstein, 2006/12/21
- Re: another GRE math exercise problem, DmitryKovtun, 2006/12/21
- Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Herman Rubin, 2006/12/21
- Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Michael Press, 2006/12/22
simplify radicals,
lite . on . beta,
2006/12/20
- Re: simplify radicals, Pubkeybreaker, 2006/12/20
- Re: simplify radicals, lite . on . beta, 2006/12/20
- Re: simplify radicals, G. A. Edgar, 2006/12/20
- Re: simplify radicals, Dave L. Renfro, 2006/12/20
- Re: simplify radicals, sttscitrans, 2006/12/20
- Re: simplify radicals, sttscitrans, 2006/12/20
- Re: simplify radicals, Badger, 2006/12/20
- Re: simplify radicals, a1jrj@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/21
Variance of SBM Powers,
Peter,
2006/12/20
- Re: Variance of SBM Powers, Peter, 2006/12/20
- Re: Variance of SBM Powers, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/20
- Re: Variance of SBM Powers, Daniel Mayost, 2006/12/20
- Re: Variance of SBM Powers, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/20
- Re: Variance of SBM Powers, Peter, 2006/12/21
decimal arithmetics--gre,
john,
2006/12/20
- Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Randy Poe, 2006/12/20
- Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Michael Jørgensen, 2006/12/20
- Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Giovanni Resta, 2006/12/20
- Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Dave L. Renfro, 2006/12/20
- Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Nick, 2006/12/20
- Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, john, 2006/12/21
field,
Luigi Cerulo,
2006/12/20
Article in Scientific American,
Stephen Montgomery-Smith,
2006/12/19
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Butch Malahide, 2006/12/20
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/20
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Phil Carmody, 2006/12/20
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/20
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Christer Ericson, 2006/12/20
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/20
- Re: Article in Scientific American, John Coleman, 2006/12/22
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Christer Ericson, 2006/12/23
- Re: Article in Scientific American, John Coleman, 2006/12/23
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Christer Ericson, 2006/12/23
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Chris Smith, 2006/12/23
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/12/24
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Chris Smith, 2006/12/24
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/12/24
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Ioannis, 2006/12/25
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/12/25
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Ioannis, 2006/12/26
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/12/26
- Re: Article in Scientific American, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/25
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Chris Smith, 2006/12/25
- Re: Article in Scientific American, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/25
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Chris Smith, 2006/12/26
- Re: Article in Scientific American, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/26
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Chris Smith, 2006/12/26
- Re: Article in Scientific American, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/26
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Michael Press, 2006/12/24
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Chris Smith, 2006/12/24
- Re: Article in Scientific American, John Coleman, 2006/12/24
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/24
- Re: Article in Scientific American, John Coleman, 2006/12/24
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/24
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Christer Ericson, 2006/12/25
- Re: Article in Scientific American, galathaea, 2006/12/23
- Re: Article in Scientific American, David Marcus, 2006/12/23
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Lee Rudolph, 2006/12/23
- a bogdanov sickness, galathaea, 2006/12/27
- Re: Article in Scientific American, galathaea, 2006/12/24
- Re: Article in Scientific American, John Coleman, 2006/12/24
- Re: Article in Scientific American, luiroto, 2006/12/26
- Re: Article in Scientific American, Han de Bruijn, 2006/12/20
- Re: Article in Scientific American, kilian heckrodt, 2006/12/20
- Re: Article in Scientific American, John Bailey, 2006/12/23
JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior,
jstevh,
2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, William Hughes, 2006/12/19
- Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, Karl-Olav Nyberg, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, Gib Bogle, 2006/12/19
- Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, The Last Danish Pastry, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, marcus_b, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, Rupert, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/20
- Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, anarchistic_progressivist, 2006/12/20
JSH: Weird if correct,
jstevh,
2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Gib Bogle, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Randy Poe, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Rupert, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, gjedwards, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, marcus_b, 2006/12/20
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/20
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, jstevh, 2006/12/21
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, junoexpress, 2006/12/21
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Arturo Magidin, 2006/12/21
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, jstevh, 2006/12/22
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, jstevh, 2006/12/22
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, marcus_b, 2006/12/22
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Rupert, 2006/12/22
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Tim Peters, 2006/12/22
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, William Hughes, 2006/12/22
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Rupert, 2006/12/21
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, marcus_b, 2006/12/21
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct, mike3, 2006/12/21
- Re: JSH: Weird if correct. You are a parasite., Red, 2006/12/22
I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers,
Ed Zagmoon,
2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, DmitryKovtun, 2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Brian, 2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, David T. Ashley, 2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, fishfry, 2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, The Ghost In The Machine, 2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Giovanni Resta, 2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, James Dolan, 2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, bassam king karzeddin, 2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 2006/12/19
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Taria, 2006/12/20
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Nick, 2006/12/20
- Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Nick, 2006/12/20
JSH: So why did they bother?,
jstevh,
2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, Rupert, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, sg552, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, Tim Peters, 2006/12/19
- Re: So why did they bother?, David Moran, 2006/12/19
- Re: So why did they bother?, Karenia Brevis, 2006/12/19
- Re: So why did they bother?, Grad Student, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, Gib Bogle, 2006/12/19
JSH: Deepening puzzle,
jstevh,
2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, marcus_b, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Chip Eastham, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, David Moran, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, marcus_b, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, DmitryKovtun, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mathtalk, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jake Wildstrom, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Rupert, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jake Wildstrom, 2006/12/21
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 2006/12/22
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Proginoskes, 2006/12/22
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Proginoskes, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jake Wildstrom, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Rupert, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, willo_thewisp, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Gonçalo Rodrigues, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Red, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/25
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Red, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, junoexpress, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, gjedwards, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, junoexpress, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, junoexpress, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Gib Bogle, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Proginoskes, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Proginoskes, 2006/12/23
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Gib Bogle, 2006/12/24
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Dik T. Winter, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Proginoskes, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Rupert, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Rupert, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Rupert, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Proginoskes, 2006/12/20
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Dik T. Winter, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Chip Eastham, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Chip Eastham, 2006/12/18
- Re: Deepening puzzle, Karenia Brevis, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, fishfry, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Rupert, 2006/12/19
"well ordering" & "total ordering",
Spitfire,
2006/12/18
- Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Dave L. Renfro, 2006/12/18
- Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Dave Seaman, 2006/12/18
- Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Arturo Magidin, 2006/12/19
- Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Peter Webb, 2006/12/19
- Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Herman Rubin, 2006/12/19
JSH: Good news and bad news,
jstevh,
2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, José Carlos Santos, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Tim Peters, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Arturo Magidin, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Randy Poe, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, William Hughes, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, David Moran, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, marcus_b, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Randy Poe, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Michael Press, 2006/12/20
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, marcus_b, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, junoexpress, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, David Bernier, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, marcus_b, 2006/12/18
- Message not available
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Proginoskes, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 2006/12/19
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, gjedwards, 2006/12/18
- Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Christopher J. Henrich, 2006/12/18
- Message not available
- Message not available
uri geller,
uri.geller.jokes@xxxxxxxxx,
2006/12/18
value,
malik_asif07,
2006/12/18
Small Set theory:Revised.,
zuhair,
2006/12/16
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/16
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/17
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 2006/12/18
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/18
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 2006/12/19
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/20
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 2006/12/20
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/20
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 2006/12/20
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/21
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 2006/12/21
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/22
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/23
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/23
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/22
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/23
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/23
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/23
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/23
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/23
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/24
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 2006/12/28
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/29
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/29
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/29
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 2006/12/29
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/30
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/30
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/31
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 2006/12/29
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/30
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/31
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/29
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/19
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/19
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 2006/12/19
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/20
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/20
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 2006/12/20
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/20
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 2006/12/20
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/21
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/21
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., MoeBlee, 2006/12/20
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/21
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., MoeBlee, 2006/12/21
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 2006/12/22
- Re: Small Set theory:Revised., MoeBlee, 2006/12/28
PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes),
Martin Winer,
2006/12/16
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/16
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Proginoskes, 2006/12/16
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Tim Peters, 2006/12/16
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Herman Rubin, 2006/12/17
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Proginoskes, 2006/12/17
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Tim Peters, 2006/12/17
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 2006/12/17
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), T.H. Ray, 2006/12/17
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 2006/12/17
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 2006/12/17
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 2006/12/17
- Cowards - where did everyone "run off" to ? Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 2006/12/18
- Back on topic - Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 2006/12/18
- Re: Cowards - where did everyone "run off" to ? Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), fishfry, 2006/12/18
- Re: Cowards - where did everyone "run off" to ? Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 2006/12/19
- Re: Cowards - where did everyone "run off" to ? Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Randy Poe, 2006/12/19
- Re: Cowards - where did everyone "run off" to ? Re: PI random? Debate run, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/18
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Martin Winer, 2006/12/18
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Han de Bruijn, 2006/12/18
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), rich burge, 2006/12/18
- Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), luiroto, 2006/12/25
assignment,
deep04nift@xxxxxxxxx,
2006/12/15
- Re: assignment, Alois Steindl, 2006/12/15
- Re: assignment, The Last Danish Pastry, 2006/12/15
- Re: assignment, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/15
- Re: assignment, The Qurqirish Dragon, 2006/12/15
- Re: assignment, Michael Stemper, 2006/12/15
simple, but subtle, math/calculus question,
opensourcearts,
2006/12/15
- Re: simple, but subtle, math/calculus question, Eric Gisse, 2006/12/15
- Re: simple, but subtle, math/calculus question, anon5874, 2006/12/15
- Re: simple, but subtle, math/calculus question, Amateur, 2006/12/15
- Re: simple, but subtle, math/calculus question, Amateur, 2006/12/15
- Re: simple, but subtle, math/calculus question, Proginoskes, 2006/12/15
What is this thing known as "=" ?,
huangxienchen,
2006/12/15
- Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., huangxienchen, 2006/12/15
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 2006/12/15
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., G . Frege, 2006/12/15
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 2006/12/16
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., huangxienchen, 2006/12/16
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han . deBruijn, 2006/12/16
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/17
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 2006/12/18
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/18
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 2006/12/18
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 2006/12/19
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/19
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., T.H. Ray, 2006/12/20
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 2006/12/20
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/20
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 2006/12/29
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 2006/12/19
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 2006/12/20
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 2006/12/20
- Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 2006/12/18
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, Phil Carmody, 2006/12/15
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, G . Frege, 2006/12/15
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/16
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, G . Frege, 2006/12/16
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/18
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/19
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/19
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/20
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/20
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, Han de Bruijn, 2006/12/20
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/20
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/21
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/21
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, Chip Eastham, 2006/12/21
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/21
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/21
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, Chip Eastham, 2006/12/21
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/23
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/23
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/23
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/23
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/23
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/23
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/24
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/24
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/24
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/24
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/25
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/25
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/25
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/25
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/26
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/27
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/16
- Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, Proginoskes, 2006/12/15
Fermat Last Theorem,
benjimon05@xxxxxxxxx,
2006/12/14
- Re: Fermat Last Theorem, jankrihau, 2006/12/14
- Re: Fermat Last Theorem, David Moran, 2006/12/14
- Re: Fermat Last Theorem, Math1723, 2006/12/14
- Re: Fermat Last Theorem, Jules, 2006/12/14
- Re: Fermat Last Theorem, William Elliot, 2006/12/15
- Re: Fermat Last Theorem, DmitryKovtun, 2006/12/15
- Re: Fermat Last Theorem, fernando revilla, 2006/12/15
reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions,
sean_in_cali,
2006/12/14
- Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 2006/12/14
- Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, David Moran, 2006/12/14
- Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, Ken Pledger, 2006/12/15
- Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/12/15
- [] reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, William Elliot, 2006/12/15
- Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, Virgil, 2006/12/15
- Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, Proginoskes, 2006/12/15
ask,
ediptkc,
2006/12/14
- Re: ask, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/14
- Re: ask, Herman Rubin, 2006/12/15
- ask, Philips, 2006/12/24
- Re: ask, Robert Israel, 2006/12/24
- Re: ask, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/24
it is my homework help me,
ediptkc,
2006/12/14
- Re: it is my homework help me, junoexpress, 2006/12/14
- Re: it is my homework help me, Randy Poe, 2006/12/14
- Re: it is my homework help me, christian.bau, 2006/12/14
- Re: it is my homework help me, junoexpress, 2006/12/14
- Re: it is my homework help me, Michael Press, 2006/12/15
The conical inverse,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com,
2006/12/14
- Inverse Cone Geometry, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/12/15
- Re: The conical inverse, Spoonfed, 2006/12/18
- Re: The conical inverse, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/12/18
- The Generalized Cone, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/12/19
- Re: The conical inverse, matt271829-news, 2006/12/20
- Re: The conical inverse, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/12/20
- Re: The conical inverse, matt271829-news, 2006/12/20
- Re: The conical inverse, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/12/21
- Re: The conical inverse, matt271829-news, 2006/12/22
- Re: The conical inverse, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/12/22
- Re: The conical inverse, Narasimham, 2006/12/22
- Re: The conical inverse, pvk3ster, 2006/12/22
- Re: The conical inverse, Narasimham, 2006/12/22
- Re: The conical inverse, Narasimham, 2006/12/22
- A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/12/23
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 2006/12/24
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 2006/12/24
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 2006/12/25
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, matt271829-news, 2006/12/25
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 2006/12/25
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, matt271829-news, 2006/12/26
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 2006/12/26
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 2006/12/26
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, matt271829-news, 2006/12/26
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 2006/12/27
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, matt271829-news, 2006/12/27
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 2006/12/29
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, matt271829-news, 2006/12/29
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 2006/12/30
- Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, matt271829-news, 2006/12/25
- Re: The conical inverse, Narasimham, 2006/12/26
help,
Philips,
2006/12/14
Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values,
Taria,
2006/12/14
- Message not available
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Rob Johnson, 2006/12/14
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, The Last Danish Pastry, 2006/12/14
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Taria, 2006/12/14
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/14
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Rob Johnson, 2006/12/15
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, kunzmilan, 2006/12/17
- Message not available
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Rob Johnson, 2006/12/17
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/17
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, kunzmilan, 2006/12/17
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/17
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, kunzmilan, 2006/12/17
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/17
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, kunzmilan, 2006/12/21
- Message not available
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Rob Johnson, 2006/12/18
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/18
- Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Dan Dima, 2006/12/14
Why "monotonically" increasing?,
Butch Malahide,
2006/12/13
- Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, christian.bau, 2006/12/13
- Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, W. Dale Hall, 2006/12/13
- Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, William Elliot, 2006/12/14
Rudin,
jhatjabs,
2006/12/13
The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website,
Julien Santini,
2006/12/13
- Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Tonico, 2006/12/13
- Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Giovanni Resta, 2006/12/13
- Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, William Elliot, 2006/12/13
- Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/13
- Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, A N Niel, 2006/12/13
- Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Stephen Weimar, 2006/12/13
- Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, David Ames, 2006/12/14
- Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Michael Press, 2006/12/14
- Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/14
Sun perhaps already provides us with the answer Re: Experiment that proves gravity does not exist in nuclear regions of atoms,
a_plutonium,
2006/12/12
- ratio of helium to hydrogen in Sun indicates gravity does not exist in the nucleus Re: Sun perhaps already provides us with the answer Re: Experiment that proves gravity does not exist in nuclear regions of atoms, a_plutonium, 2006/12/13
- Nagamine muon catalyzed fusion supports no gravity in nucleus Re: ratio of helium to hydrogen in Sun indicates gravity does not exist in the nucleus Re: Sun perhaps already provides us with the answer Re: Experiment that proves gravity does not exist in nuclear regions of atoms, a_plutonium, 2006/12/13
- Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 2006/12/14
- Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Uncle Al, 2006/12/14
- Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Salmon Egg, 2006/12/15
- GR never even defined what "space" is, and no wonder they chased after the fictional graviton particle Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 2006/12/15
- Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 2006/12/15
- Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Michael Moroney, 2006/12/18
- Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, carlip-nospam, 2006/12/19
- lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 2006/12/20
- This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 2006/12/20
- Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Proginoskes, 2006/12/21
- Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 2006/12/21
- Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Proginoskes, 2006/12/21
- Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 2006/12/21
- Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Proginoskes, 2006/12/22
- Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 2006/12/23
- Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Proginoskes, 2006/12/23
- whether Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall are contiguous Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 2006/12/24
- Re: whether Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall are contiguous Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 2006/12/24
- density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true, a_plutonium, 2006/12/25
- Re: density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/25
- Re: density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true, T Wake, 2006/12/25
- Re: density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true, Proginoskes, 2006/12/26
- Re: density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true, a_plutonium, 2006/12/26
- Re: density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true, Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/26
- Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 2006/12/22
- Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Michael Moroney, 2006/12/21
- if gravity existed in nuclei then we should hear some squecking noise Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 2006/12/15
- smashing pions or muons with protons to form neutrons Re: Nagamine muon catalyzed fusion supports no gravity in nucleus Re: ratio of helium to hydrogen in Sun indicates gravity does not exist in the nucleus Re: Sun perhaps already provides us with the answer Re: Experiment that proves gravity does not exist in nuclear regions of atoms, a_plutonium, 2006/12/16
- muons should provide the answer as to whether the nucleus has gravity Re: Nagamine muon catalyzed fusion supports no gravity in nucleus, a_plutonium, 2006/12/17
Hilbert space question,
James,
2006/12/12
- Re: Hilbert space question, Volker Boie, 2006/12/12
- Re: Hilbert space question, Daniel Grubb, 2006/12/12
- Re: Hilbert space question, bobm2005, 2006/12/12
- Re: Hilbert space question, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 2006/12/12
- Re: Hilbert space question, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 2006/12/13
Sortov convergence,
Larry Hammick,
2006/12/12
- Re: Sortov convergence, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/12
- Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/12
- Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/12
- Re: Sortov convergence, Chip Eastham, 2006/12/12
- Re: Sortov convergence, Chip Eastham, 2006/12/12
- Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/12
- Re: Sortov convergence, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/13
- Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/13
- Re: Sortov convergence, David M Einstein, 2006/12/13
- Re: Sortov convergence, David M Einstein, 2006/12/13
- Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/13
- Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/13
- Re: Sortov convergence, rancid moth, 2006/12/14
- Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/14
- Re: Sortov convergence, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/14
- Re: Sortov convergence, Chip Eastham, 2006/12/13
Infinite sets.,
zuhair,
2006/12/12
- Re: Infinite sets., Virgil, 2006/12/12
- Re: Infinite sets., Rupert, 2006/12/12
- Re: Infinite sets., fishfry, 2006/12/12
- Re: Infinite sets., Bob Kolker, 2006/12/12
- Re: Infinite sets., David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/12
- Re: Infinite sets., Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/12
- Re: Infinite sets., William Hughes, 2006/12/12
- Re: Infinite sets., Jonathan Hoyle, 2006/12/12
- Re: Infinite sets., boxgirlhunny, 2006/12/12
- Re: Infinite sets., Saurav, 2006/12/13
- Re: Infinite sets., Saurav, 2006/12/13
Re: The proof of mass vector.,
yen, ka-in,
2006/12/12
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/12
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 2006/12/12
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Randy Poe, 2006/12/14
- Re: The proof of mass vector., yen, ka-in, 2006/12/25
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 2006/12/25
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2006/12/27
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 2006/12/27
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., yen, ka-in, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 2006/12/25
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 2006/12/25
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/25
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Pmb, 2006/12/25
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/25
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2006/12/27
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2006/12/27
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 2006/12/27
- Re: The proof of mass vector., yen, ka-in, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2006/12/30
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 2006/12/30
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/30
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2006/12/27
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 2006/12/28
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2006/12/29
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 2006/12/29
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2006/12/30
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/30
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 2006/12/30
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/30
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 2006/12/30
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Autymn D. C., 2006/12/30
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 2006/12/30
- Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 2006/12/30
is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform),
paulwvanc,
2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Rune Allnor, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), joep1000, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Randy Yates, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Randy Yates, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Rune Allnor, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Randy Yates, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/11
- Message not available
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Jerry Avins, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Randy Yates, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Randy Yates, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Randy Yates, 2006/12/13
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Randy Yates, 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Randy Yates, 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Jerry Avins, 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Jerry Avins, 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Jerry Avins, 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Ron N., 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Jerry Avins, 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Ron N., 2006/12/14
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 2006/12/11
- Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Ron N., 2006/12/11
Opinions on mathematics.,
Michael Press,
2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., huangxienchen, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Bob Kolker, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Gauster, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Rupert, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., fishfry, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Gauster, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Michael Press, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., fishfry, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Michael Press, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., fishfry, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Michael Press, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Bob Kolker, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Michael Press, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Bob Kolker, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Michael Press, 2006/12/12
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Ioannis, 2006/12/12
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Gauster, 2006/12/12
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Ioannis, 2006/12/13
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., cbrown, 2006/12/13
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Ioannis, 2006/12/13
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Gauster, 2006/12/14
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Ioannis, 2006/12/15
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., cbrown, 2006/12/15
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Gauster, 2006/12/14
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Ioannis, 2006/12/15
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Bob Kolker, 2006/12/12
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Michael Press, 2006/12/12
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Nathan, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Michael Press, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Bob Kolker, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Bob Kolker, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Bob Kolker, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Gottfried Helms, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., bassam king karzeddin, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., Nick, 2006/12/11
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., galathaea, 2006/12/12
- Re: Opinions on mathematics., David Bernier, 2006/12/14
Why does Cantor a target for cranks?,
Andrew Usher,
2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Larry Hammick, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, José Carlos Santos, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Keith Ramsay, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Dirk Van de moortel, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, huangxienchen, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, imaginatorium, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, William Hughes, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/11
- Message not available
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, cbrown, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 2006/12/11
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/10
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, RichD, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Lester Zick, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Ross A. Finlayson, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, David R Tribble, 2006/12/12
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/12
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 2006/12/12
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/12
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 2006/12/12
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/12
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/12
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, marcus_b, 2006/12/12
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/13
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/12
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Lester Zick, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, marcus_b, 2006/12/11
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Six Letters, 2006/12/11
- Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, david petry, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, fishfry, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, The World Wide Wade, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han . deBruijn, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/14
- godel numbering exist only for finite specifications, galathaea, 2006/12/18
- ?? which reals ??, galathaea, 2006/12/18
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, |-|erc, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, lugita15, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, lugita15, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, lugita15, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Nam Nguyen, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Nam Nguyen, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, george, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/18
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, lugita15, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Gc, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Michael Press, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Albrecht, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Gc, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Franziska Neugebauer, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Gc, 2006/12/19
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Aatu Koskensilta, 2006/12/19
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Jacko, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Gc, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Gc, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, abo, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Peter_Smith, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Newberry, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, abo, 2006/12/17
- formal for all metas, galathaea, 2006/12/17
- Re: formal for all metas, galathaea, 2006/12/17
- Why is cantor a target for cranks, Tonico, 2006/12/18
- Re: Why is cantor a target for cranks, Michael Press, 2006/12/18
- Re: Why is cantor a target for cranks, Tonico, 2006/12/18
- formal for all metas, galathaea, 2006/12/18
- the constructivist line, galathaea, 2006/12/18
- Re: the constructivist line, galathaea, 2006/12/18
- Re: formal for all metas, aatu . koskensilta, 2006/12/18
- Re: formal for all metas, galathaea, 2006/12/18
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Nam Nguyen, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 2006/12/18
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Michael Press, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Timothy Murphy, 2006/12/14
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Charlie-Boo, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, apoorv, 2006/12/15
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, abo, 2006/12/16
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Nick, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Nick, 2006/12/17
- Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Newberry, 2006/12/29
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Albrecht, 2006/12/14
JSH: The right thing to do now, a vote,
jstevh@xxxxxxx,
2006/12/10
- Re: The right thing to do now, a vote, Jon Slaughter, 2006/12/10
- Re: JSH: The right thing to do now, a vote, paulwvanc, 2006/12/10
- Re: JSH: The right thing to do now, a vote, Rupert, 2006/12/10
- Re: The right thing to do now, a vote, Karenia Brevis, 2006/12/10
- Re: JSH: The right thing to do now, a vote, fishfry, 2006/12/10
- Re: The right thing to do now, a vote, Father knows best, 2006/12/11
Can't Prove nC8 = nC12 for n = 20,
trompelamort,
2006/12/10
- Re: Can't Prove nC8 = nC12 for n = 20, Paul Sperry, 2006/12/10
- Re: Can't Prove nC8 = nC12 for n = 20, Bee, 2006/12/10
- Re: Can't Prove nC8 = nC12 for n = 20, paulwvanc, 2006/12/10
- Re: Can't Prove nC8 = nC12 for n = 20, William Elliot, 2006/12/10
- Re: Can't Prove nC8 = nC12 for n = 20, W. Dale Hall, 2006/12/10
Cantor's cardinality finally refuted.,
zuhair,
2006/12/10
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 2006/12/10
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., David Marcus, 2006/12/10
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 2006/12/10
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 2006/12/10
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 2006/12/10
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 2006/12/10
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 2006/12/10
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 2006/12/11
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 2006/12/11
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 2006/12/11
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 2006/12/11
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 2006/12/12
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 2006/12/12
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 2006/12/12
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 2006/12/12
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 2006/12/12
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 2006/12/12
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., cbrown, 2006/12/12
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 2006/12/12
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 2006/12/12
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Dave L. Renfro, 2006/12/10
- Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., guenther vonKnakspot, 2006/12/10
JSH: Why would they tell the truth?,
jstevh,
2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, gjedwards, 2006/12/09
- Re: Why would they tell the truth?, Karenia Brevis, 2006/12/09
- Re: Why would they tell the truth?, David Moran, 2006/12/09
- Re: Why would they tell the truth?, jstevh, 2006/12/09
- Re: Why would they tell the truth?, junoexpress, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, Tim Peters, 2006/12/09
- Re: Why would they tell the truth?, jshsucks, 2006/12/09
- Re: Why would they tell the truth?, David Moran, 2006/12/09
- Re: Why would they tell the truth?, John Blivot, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, junoexpress, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, Gib Bogle, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, willo_thewisp, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, jshsucks, 2006/12/09
- Re: Why would they tell the truth?, John Blivot, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, Rupert, 2006/12/10
- Re: JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, Proginoskes, 2006/12/10
- JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, jstevh, 2006/12/09
- JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, jstevh, 2006/12/09
JSH: One mystery remains,
jstevh,
2006/12/09
- Re: One mystery remains, Karenia Brevis, 2006/12/09
- Re: One mystery remains, Anton Foreskineater, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, gjedwards, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, gjedwards, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, gjedwards, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, jshsucks, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, marcus_b, 2006/12/09
- Re: One mystery remains, John Blivot, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Rupert, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, William Hughes, 2006/12/10
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/10
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Proginoskes, 2006/12/11
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, jstevh, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, jshsucks, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, jshsucks, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, jstevh, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Rupert, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Proginoskes, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Michael Press, 2006/12/13
- Re: Death of the Net Predicted! (was: JSH: One mystery remains), litsohate, 2006/12/13
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, sg552, 2006/12/13
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, DmitryKovtun, 2006/12/13
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Rupert, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, David Moran, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, marcus_b, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, T.H. Ray, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, willo_thewisp, 2006/12/10
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains, DOD, 2006/12/12
JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive,
jstevh,
2006/12/09
- Re: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Jada, 2006/12/09
- Re: Simpler explanation important as to motive, David Moran, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, jstevh, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, sg552, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Tim Peters, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Arturo Magidin, 2006/12/13
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, marcus_b, 2006/12/13
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Tim Peters, 2006/12/13
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Proginoskes, 2006/12/14
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, marcus_b, 2006/12/14
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Rick Decker, 2006/12/14
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, marcus_b, 2006/12/14
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Rick Decker, 2006/12/14
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, junoexpress, 2006/12/14
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Tim Peters, 2006/12/14
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Tim Peters, 2006/12/14
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Arturo Magidin, 2006/12/14
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, marcus_b, 2006/12/14
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Michael Press, 2006/12/15
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, marcus_b, 2006/12/15
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Tim Peters, 2006/12/17
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Michael Press, 2006/12/14
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, John Blivot, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Rupert, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, junoexpress, 2006/12/10
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, gjedwards, 2006/12/10
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Gib Bogle, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Tim Peters, 2006/12/09
- Re: Simpler explanation important as to motive, John Blivot, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Rupert, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Proginoskes, 2006/12/10
- Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, David C . Ullrich, 2006/12/10
hi,
FERHAT AÇICI,
2006/12/09
- Re: hi, Menderes ISKIN, 2006/12/09
Re: JSH: Short explanation, why error is so big,
jankrihau,
2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Short explanation, why error is so big, jstevh, 2006/12/09
- Re: JSH: Short explanation, why error is so big, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/12
- Re: JSH: Short explanation, why error is so big, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/13
- Re: JSH: Short explanation, why error is so big, Jesse F. Hughes, 2006/12/14
- Re: JSH: Short explanation, why error is so big, Red, 2006/12/17