sci.math
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: inverse gradient

Subject: Re: inverse gradient
From: Robert Israel
Date: 31 Dec 2006 20:44:33 GMT
Newsgroups: sci.math
In article <VXRlh.8205$yC5.3846@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Jon Slaughter <Jon_Slaughter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"Proginoskes" <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
>news:1167546864.806173.34110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Jon Slaughter wrote:
>>> Is there such a thing?
>>
>> Yes; it's called a potential function.
>>
>>     --- Christopher Heckman
>>
>
>Also, not all vector fields are conservative so there is not always a 
>potential function involved. I suppose here the inverse
>gradient would be 
>singular.

>What I'm takling about is not what the gradient/inverse
>gradient do but the 
>*operators* themselfs.

Given a vector field F that has a scalar potential, you can 
get that potential, up to a constant, by a line integral:

phi(x) = const + int_{C(x)} F.dr
where C(x) is a rectifiable curve starting at some given 
point and ending at x.  

F has a scalar potential (on a given domain) iff for every
x in the domain the result does not depend on which curve is 
chosen.
 
Robert Israel                                israel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Department of Mathematics        http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel 
University of British Columbia            Vancouver, BC, Canada


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy