|
|
Lester Zick schrieb:
> Hero wrote:
>
> >Lester Zick schrieb:
> >
> >> Hero wrote:
> >>
> >> >Lester Zick schrieb:
> >> >
> >> >> Richard Tobin
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > ooo wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> What real line? There is no real line in formal terms. Transcendentals
> >> >> such as pi are defined on circular arcs and not on non circular lines.
> >> >>
l
> >>
> >> Which is one reason we don't mention real number lines in polite
> >> society. They're a joke foisted on an unsuspecting public by modern
> >> mathematikers who can't even produce straight lines much less point
> >> out transcendentals on them.
> >>
> >That's the punishment for taking the independent variable and other
> >changes and movements out of math.
> >Transcendentals such as pi are defined as the proportion of an circular
> >arc to a non circular line, here ( length of a circle ) / ( diameter
> >of this circle). How do You get this proportion onto a straight line?
>
> You don't. You can't get any curve onto a straight line. That's why
> they're curves and transcendentals are transcendentals. Too bad but
> that's life in the curved lane.
>
> >The diameter with a compass and the circumference, when one rolls a
> >wheel on it, exactly one rotation.
> >And when one does this, one discovers that there is a gap between the
> >algebraic points on this line, which are derived from the multitude of
> >the "diameter of the circle" transferred onto this line, into which
> >this transcendental point fits.
> >Why is distorted motosensory perception so prevailing in some
> >mathematical societies?
>
> Primarily I suspect because modern mathematikers are too lazy or
> stupid to demonstrate the truth of their claims.
>
> >It's to hard and unpolite - no, i'm just concluding from myself onto
> >others.
>
> You needn't concern yourself. Truth goes begging when supposedly
> critical thinkers are just allowed to assume the truth of their
> assumptions. Modern mathematikers can't even produce the straight
> lines they claim their reals lie on.
A. Peaucellier (1832-1913) did it - with moivement. And when "modern
mathematicians" still can do some transformations like circle inversion
(conformal), which are also movements, they can get straight lines even
out of their curved staionary universes.
http://www.pandd.demon.nl/peaucel.htm
Prosperous New Year
Hero
PS.Truth rewards some to showing up to them, for example when they are
critical to the assumptions, that time is spatial.
|
|