|
|
On 30 Dec 2006 12:01:41 -0800, "Hero" <Hero.van.Jindelt@xxxxxx> wrote:
>Lester Zick schrieb:
>
>> Hero wrote:
>>
>> >Lester Zick schrieb:
>> >
>> >> Richard Tobin
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > ooo wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>> >If real line is filled with points and each point is
>> >> >>> >distinguished,then each point has difference from every other points.
>> >> >>> >Therfore real line has void.
>> >> >
>> >> >>> Can you prove that? ...
>
>
>> >> > So the point in the middle is also a real
>> >> > number.
>> >>
>> >> What real line? There is no real line in formal terms. Transcendentals
>> >> such as pi are defined on circular arcs and not on non circular lines.
>> >>
>> >> ~v~~
>> >
>> >Archimedes wrote:
>> >http://www.math.ubc.ca/~cass/archimedes/circle.html
>>
>> Which is one reason we don't mention real number lines in polite
>> society. They're a joke foisted on an unsuspecting public by modern
>> mathematikers who can't even produce straight lines much less point
>> out transcendentals on them.
>>
>> >and
>> >On the sphere and the cylinder
>> > www.hti.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?sid=dd206abfa376559fc0589f8c822fe5d1;c=umhistmath;idno=ABW0362.0001.001">http://www.hti.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?sid=dd206abfa376559fc0589f8c822fe5d1;c=umhistmath;idno=ABW0362.0001.001
>> >
>
>That's the punishment for taking the independent variable and other
>changes and movements out of math.
>Transcendentals such as pi are defined as the proportion of an circular
>arc to a non circular line, here ( length of a circle ) / ( diameter
>of this circle). How do You get this proportion onto a straight line?
You don't. You can't get any curve onto a straight line. That's why
they're curves and transcendentals are transcendentals. Too bad but
that's life in the curved lane.
>The diameter with a compass and the circumference, when one rolls a
>wheel on it, exactly one rotation.
>And when one does this, one discovers that there is a gap between the
>algebraic points on this line, which are derived from the multitude of
>the "diameter of the circle" transferred onto this line, into which
>this transcendental point fits.
>Why is distorted motosensory perception so prevailing in some
>mathematical societies?
Primarily I suspect because modern mathematikers are too lazy or
stupid to demonstrate the truth of their claims.
>It's to hard and unpolite - no, i'm just concluding from myself onto
>others.
You needn't concern yourself. Truth goes begging when supposedly
critical thinkers are just allowed to assume the truth of their
assumptions. Modern mathematikers can't even produce the straight
lines they claim their reals lie on.
>With friendly greetings
>Hero
~v~~
|
|