| Subject: | Re: inverse gradient |
|---|---|
| From: | "Jon Slaughter" |
| Date: | Sun, 31 Dec 2006 16:59:34 GMT |
| Newsgroups: | sci.math |
> > Obviously what we do know is that the inverse gradient takes a vector > field and returns a scalar field. Oh, and not necessarily that it returns a unique scalar function. Essentially the gradient is a derivative while the inverse gradient would be an antiderivative/integral. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Simple proof that the gravity energy is nonlocal in Einstein's 1915 GR, karandash2000 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, T.H. Ray |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: inverse gradient, Jon Slaughter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: inverse gradient, Robert Israel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |