sci.math (date)

sci.math (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

December 31, 2006

Re: inverse gradient, Lee Rudolph, 15:57
Re: Extending the reals, cbrown, 15:53
Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, matt271829-news, 15:53
Re: Linear regression or time-series forecasting? What's more appropriate?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:50
Re: inverse gradient, Robert Israel, 15:44
Re: Interesting Math Books?, Tonico, 15:43
Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, huangxienchen, 15:37
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ?, Jarek, 15:29
explaining why Regular Primes was easy to prove, yet Twin impossible Re: Proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; new method in Number theory, a_plutonium, 15:05
Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Virgil, 14:54
Re: base 10 number system, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:47
Re: a few more general GRE math problems, David T. Ashley, 14:45
Re: Extending the reals, Tony Orlow, 14:35
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero, 14:33
Re: Linear regression or time-series forecasting? What's more appropriate?, Reef Fish, 14:27
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 14:25
Proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; new method in Number theory, a_plutonium, 14:24
Re: base 10 number system, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:22
Re: Interesting Math Books?, mathedman, 14:20
Re: on logic, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:17
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero, 14:12
Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:10
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Lester Zick, 14:10
Re: Linear regression or time-series forecasting? What's more appropriate?, Nick, 14:06
Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, Lee Rudolph, 14:05
Re: base 10 number system, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:05
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Lester Zick, 13:58
Re: Interesting Math Books?, John Coleman, 13:54
Re: Linear regression or time-series forecasting? What's more appropriate?, Nick, 13:48
Re: A question of logical terminology, Lee Rudolph, 13:42
Re: base 10 number system, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:38
Re: A question of logical terminology, David C . Ullrich, 13:37
Re: Told you so. Was: Re: troublespot appearing Re: Proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 13:30
Linear regression or time-series forecasting? What's more appropriate?, iwan2no, 13:18
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 13:13
Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, Ralf Goertz, 13:07
Re: Prime Numbers, Nick, 13:07
Re: Interesting Math Books?, Nick, 13:02
Re: A question of logical terminology, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 13:02
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, toshiaki, 12:59
Re: Interesting Math Books?, Nick, 12:56
Re: general gre math problem, Nick, 12:54
Re: base 10 number system, Nick, 12:48
Re: base 10 number system, Nick, 12:40
Re: Interesting Math Books?, David Bernier, 12:40
Re: A question of logical terminology, Nam Nguyen, 12:36
Re: A question of logical terminology, Karl-Olav Nyberg, 12:32
Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Cary, 12:31
A question of logical terminology, google03, 12:27
Re: inverse gradient, Jon Slaughter, 12:06
Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, T.H. Ray, 12:03
Re: inverse gradient, Jon Slaughter, 11:59
Re: Simple proof that the gravity energy is nonlocal in Einstein's 1915 GR, karandash2000, 11:57
Re: inverse gradient, Jon Slaughter, 11:55
Re: f and f' square integrable, David C . Ullrich, 11:54
Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, José Carlos Santos, 11:32
Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:16
Re: general gre math problem, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:11
Re: Large composites with just two prime factors of equal length., fasttrack2a, 11:11
Re: On The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic and Why it Breaks Down for the Algebraics, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:56
Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:49
Re: base 10 number system, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:45
Re: Interesting Math Books?, David C . Ullrich, 10:43
Re: general gre math problem, The Qurqirish Dragon, 10:25
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 10:19
Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, David C . Ullrich, 10:18
Re: Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, Costas Vlachos, 10:06
Re: f and f' square integrable, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:06
Re: base 10 number system, Peacenik, 10:05
Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Peacenik, 09:45
Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, James, 09:43
Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, huangxienchen, 09:39
Re: inverse gradient, Jon Slaughter, 09:37
Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, huangxienchen, 09:26
Re: a few more general GRE math problems, pauldepstein, 09:25
Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Dana DeLouis, 09:17
Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, David Bernier, 09:16
Re: On The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic and Why it Breaks Down for the Algebraics, Arturo Magidin, 09:14
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", hagman, 08:51
Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, Lee Rudolph, 08:36
Re: Interesting Math Books?, T.H. Ray, 08:31
Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, Timothy Murphy, 08:09
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Saurav, 08:07
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 08:03
Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, matt271829-news, 08:02
Re: base 10 number system, hagman, 08:00
Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, James, 07:59
Re: Laplace's rule of succession, hagman, 07:37
Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, T.H. Ray, 07:13
difficult question, tamiry, 06:55
Re: You're screwing Usenet too, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:37
Re: Group of order 720, Derek Holt, 06:25
Re: Prime Numbers, Quantum Ranger, 06:15
Egyptian fractal, Antonio González, 06:10
Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Nick, 06:05
Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, Quantum Ranger, 05:55
Re: a few more general GRE math problems, Daniel Mayost, 05:52
Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, Ralf Goertz, 05:33
Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, Ralf Goertz, 05:23
Re: base 10 number system, Nick, 05:11
Re: base 10 number system, Nick, 04:53
on logic, �a\\/b, 04:52
a few more general GRE math problems, john, 04:39
Re: Hilbert space inequality, Robert Israel, 04:38
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ? continued fraction convergents//, Robert Israel, 04:14
Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, William Elliot, 04:14
Re: general gre math problem, john, 04:10
Re: domain notation for a function, William Elliot, 03:58
The Origin Of Jesus Christ - @ YouTube, TOR Hershman, 03:56
Re: SO(n) and O(n) questions, José Carlos Santos, 03:53
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Prime..., Michael Press, 03:36
Re: f and f' square integrable, Fedor, 03:32
Re: general gre math problem, David T. Ashley, 03:10
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Prime..., Tim Peters, 03:08
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 03:02
Told you so. Was: Re: troublespot appearing Re: Proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes, Proginoskes, 02:56
Finally, a reasonable response to my objection; was Re: Not so fast! Was: Re: fixed the Chris Heckman objection Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, Proginoskes, 02:48
troublespot appearing Re: Proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 02:42
Re: general gre math problem, Ted Hwa, 02:37
general gre math problem, john, 02:27
Re: the biggest logical pitfall in mathematics is not .99999 =1, nor Bayes conundrum in probability, but is Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, Proginoskes, 02:18
Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, Michael Press, 02:17
Re: Extending the reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:15
Re: base 10 number system, David T. Ashley, 01:46
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ? continued fraction convergents//, Proginoskes, 01:45
Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Proginoskes, 01:41
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Prime..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 01:39
Re: inverse gradient, Proginoskes, 01:34
Re: Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, Proginoskes, 01:33
Re: domain notation for a function, vishvas, 01:29
Re: base 10 number system, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:13
the biggest logical pitfall in mathematics is not .99999 =1, nor Bayes conundrum in probability, but is Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 01:11
Re: a war on f-notations (hypergeometric somnambulisms), Azure, 00:54
Proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 00:45
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Butch Malahide, 00:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 00:41
base 10 number system, bob, 00:33
Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, huangxienchen, 00:15
Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 00:13
Re: f and f' square integrable, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 00:06
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Prime..., Tim Peters, 00:04

December 30, 2006

Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 23:58
domain notation for a function, sean_in_cali, 23:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 23:47
Re: with an Amendment, I do have an Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; satisfying Dik Winter's objection, Dik T. Winter, 23:33
a war on f-notations (hypergeometric somnambulisms), galathaea, 23:30
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, gjedwards, 23:22
Re: You're screwing Usenet too, nospam, 23:22
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ? continued fraction convergents//, Robert Israel, 23:18
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Prime..., Dik T. Winter, 23:15
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 23:09
Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 23:09
Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, a_plutonium, 22:57
Re: Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:55
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 22:54
passive radar theory refrence needed, Peter Divos, 22:52
Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, a_plutonium, 22:51
Re: You're screwing Usenet too, Larry Hammick, 22:39
Re: Not so fast! Was: Re: fixed the Chris Heckman objection Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, a_plutonium, 22:39
Re: Bijective mappings of real functions, theronruiz, 22:30
Re: Interesting Math Books?, David T. Ashley, 22:28
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:18
Calling all Geese - Calling all Geese -, huangxienchen, 22:15
Laplace's rule of succession, Scott H, 22:12
Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Squidward Tentacles, 22:10
Re: Interesting Math Books?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:58
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, junoexpress, 21:55
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ?, Bob Delaney, 21:45
Re: You're screwing Usenet too, nospam, 21:17
Re: On finite reflection groups, Timothy Murphy, 21:14
Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, matt271829-news, 21:07
Re: Small set Theory:final version., zuhair, 21:05
Re: Interesting Math Books?, Cary, 21:00
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 20:56
Re: Interesting Math Books?, Kira Yamato, 20:52
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Rupert, 20:48
Re: Interesting Math Books?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 20:38
Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 20:23
Simple proof that the gravity energy is nonlocal in Einstein's 1915 GR, Jack Sarfatti, 20:18
Re: Interesting Math Books?, Ivar Rosquist, 19:50
Re: Group of order 720, Kira Yamato, 19:45
Re: Group of order 720, Kira Yamato, 19:44
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ?, CW, 19:44
Re: Group of order 720, Kira Yamato, 19:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:29
Pythagorean theorem, theory of area, Rupert, 19:29
Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, Rupert, 19:25
Re: Counting prime numbers, nospam, 19:20
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Richard Tobin, 19:19
Re: You're screwing Usenet too, nospam, 19:16
Re: Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, Marc, 19:15
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Tom S, 19:09
Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, Tim Peters, 19:04
Re: JSH: It IS fraud, nospam, 19:01
Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 18:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 18:54
Article: Joint Mathematics Meetings in New Orleans January 5-8, 2007, Robert Karl Stonjek, 18:53
Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 18:49
Re: distribution of n point on the unit circle, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:43
Re: What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, m7ossny, 18:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:37
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Jonathan Hoyle, 18:37
a war on f-notations (hypergeometric somnambulisms), galathaea, 18:35
Re: Interesting Math Books?, David T. Ashley, 18:29
Re: eigenvalues of products of matrices, Jannick Asmus, 18:27
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Wayne Brown, 18:26
Re: eigenvalues of products of matrices, Jannick Asmus, 18:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:20
Re: Hessian Matrix - A stupid question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:18
Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Rupert, 18:08
Large composites with just two prime factors of equal length., fasttrack2a, 18:01
Interesting Math Books?, C, 17:59
Video Saddam Hussein 'executed in Iraq' L'exécution de Saddam Hussein 0021275831620, yahala, 17:46
Re: Hessian Matrix - A stupid question, Thomchad, 17:32
Re: Hessian Matrix - A stupid question, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 17:12
Hessian Matrix - A stupid question, Thomchad, 17:08
Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Gib Bogle, 17:06
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Gib Bogle, 17:05
f and f' square integrable, Fedor, 17:02
SO(n) and O(n) questions, James, 17:01
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Ross A. Finlayson, 16:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:42
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 16:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:30
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", T.H. Ray, 16:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:25
Re: Group of order 720, rsvirk, 16:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Ralf Bader, 16:16
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 16:14
Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Gon�alo Rodrigues, 16:13
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 16:12
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 16:09
Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Jim Ferry, 16:00
Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, Tonico, 15:57
On The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic and Why it Breaks Down for the Algebraics, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:53
Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Virgil, 15:52
Re: relative error for 'zero' input, hagman, 15:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:44
Re: JSH: It IS fraud, Randy Poe, 15:43
Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, David, 15:43
Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, Michael Hennebry, 15:41
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, Randy Poe, 15:39
Re: relative error for 'zero' input, Dejfson, 15:38
Re: Simple Geometry Problem, Randy Poe, 15:37
Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, Tim Peters, 15:35
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 15:34
Re: Simple Geometry Problem, David W . Cantrell, 15:34
Simple Geometry Problem, david bandel, 15:30
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", T.H. Ray, 15:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:28
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, david bandel, 15:26
distribution of n point on the unit circle, Ralf Goertz, 15:24
Re: JSH: It IS fraud, hagman, 15:24
Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, Eliza, 15:24
Re: Prime Numbers, Michael Press, 15:21
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 15:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:14
Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, N. Silver, 15:08
Hilbert space inequality, PublicJY, 15:07
Re: relative error for 'zero' input, David W . Cantrell, 15:01
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero, 15:01
Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, hagman, 15:00
Re: relative error for 'zero' input, Dejfson, 14:56
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, David C . Ullrich, 14:50
Re: JSH: It IS fraud, David C . Ullrich, 14:48
Re: Extending the reals, David R Tribble, 14:43
Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, David C . Ullrich, 14:42
Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, Eliza, 14:33
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Prime..., Michael Press, 14:27
Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, hagman, 14:24
Re: Noobish differential equations question..., David C . Ullrich, 14:18
Re: Noobish differential equations question..., Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:16
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 14:13
Re: Extending the reals, David R Tribble, 14:11
Re: You're screwing Usenet too, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:10
Re: JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, sg552, 14:09
Re: JSH: It IS fraud, jankrihau, 14:03
Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, sg552, 14:02
Re: Bijective mappings of real functions, Dave Seaman, 14:01
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 13:58
JSH: You're screwing Usenet too, jstevh, 13:58
Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:54
Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, jstevh, 13:53
JSH: It IS fraud, jstevh, 13:50
inverse gradient, Jon Slaughter, 13:46
Re: JSH: Counting prime numbers, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 13:34
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 13:28
JSH: Counting prime numbers, jstevh, 13:16
Re: Extending the reals, Tony Orlow, 13:04
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, G.E. Ivey, 13:01
Bijective mappings of real functions, theronruiz, 12:59
Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:56
Re: relative error for 'zero' input, David W . Cantrell, 12:47
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Lester Zick, 12:43
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Lester Zick, 12:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 12:37
Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, a_plutonium, 12:23
Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:21
Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, Eliza, 12:21
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 12:09
Re: Tricky Calculus Problem, hagman, 12:09
Re: relative error for 'zero' input, hagman, 11:55
Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:54
using modular symbols with magma, Oswald Kluge, 11:52
Tricky Calculus Problem, Eliza, 11:50
relative error for 'zero' input, Dejfson, 11:48
Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, Patrik Stellmann, 11:41
Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, hagman, 11:40
Difficult PDE, Sotto, 11:40
Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, Patrik Stellmann, 11:40
Re: eigenvalues of products of matrices, hagman, 11:28
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", T.H. Ray, 11:17
Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, bennett, 11:07
Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, hagman, 11:06
Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, G . Frege, 10:53
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 10:52
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 10:51
Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, G . Frege, 10:50
Noobish differential equations question..., sg552, 10:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, hagman, 10:42
Re: How to use MSExcel to plot Column A against Col B?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:39
Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, G . Frege, 10:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 10:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:28
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", hagman, 10:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:23
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", T.H. Ray, 10:23
Re: Uncountable numbers?, David W . Cantrell, 10:21
Re: isomorphisms and modulus, David C . Ullrich, 10:07
Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, guenther vonKnakspot, 10:02
Re: eigenvalues of products of matrices, fernando revilla, 09:54
Re: An inequality involving sqrt., hagman, 09:52
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 09:41
Re: isomorphisms and modulus, hagman, 09:39
Re: eigenvalues of products of matrices, Jannick Asmus, 09:26
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:19
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 09:10
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 09:07
Re: isomorphisms and modulus, Jannick Asmus, 09:05
isomorphisms and modulus, eugene, 08:54
Re: Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, junoexpress, 08:26
Re: Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, junoexpress, 08:22
Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, hagman, 08:16
Re: An inequality involving sqrt., David C . Ullrich, 08:07
Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, christian.bau, 07:51
An inequality involving sqrt., jseppa17@xxxxxxxxx, 07:46
Re: Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, Costas Vlachos, 07:41
Re: Group of order 720, Derek Holt, 07:27
Re: Internet Security Warning!, Aatu Koskensilta, 07:19
Re: How to use MSExcel to plot Column A against Col B?, hagman, 06:59
Re: unknown function, David C . Ullrich, 06:59
Re: eigenvalues of products of matrices, hagman, 06:49
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich, 06:34
Re: How to use MSExcel to plot Column A against Col B?, José Carlos Santos, 06:30
How to use MSExcel to plot Column A against Col B?, joyo, 06:09
unknown function, Philips, 05:37
Not so fast! Was: Re: fixed the Chris Heckman objection Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, Proginoskes, 05:33
eigenvalues of products of matrices, splotint, 05:02
Boolean Algebra / Karnaugh Maps with N > 2 (Higher Dimensions), David T. Ashley, 04:34
Re: Series, Cary, 03:34
Re: fixed the Chris Heckman objection Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, a_plutonium, 02:17
fixed the Chris Heckman objection Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, a_plutonium, 02:06
Re: The proof of mass vector., Autymn D. C., 01:59
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 01:38
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Saurav, 01:26
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 01:22
Re: a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, Proginoskes, 01:08
Re: with an Amendment, I do have an Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; satisfying Dik Winter's objection, Proginoskes, 01:02
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ? continued fraction convergents//, Proginoskes, 00:57
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ?, Proginoskes, 00:54
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 00:42
Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals, Six Letters, 00:32
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ?, Proginoskes, 00:20
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David Bernier, 00:01

December 29, 2006

Group of order 720, rsvirk, 23:45
Re: Prime Numbers, William Elliot, 23:34
a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; after a adjustment; Proof of Infinitude of Quad, Hex, Octo primes etc etc, a_plutonium, 23:23
Re: Prime Numbers, Klueless, 23:16
with an Amendment, I do have an Infinitude of Twin Primes Proof; satisfying Dik Winter's objection, a_plutonium, 23:10
why there are 22 hex primes in the 1-200 interval; these SPECIAL COMPOSITES and why 140s has only one prime 149, a_plutonium, 22:14
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 22:13
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 22:05
Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, matt271829-news, 22:04
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 21:44
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Prime..., Dik T. Winter, 21:21
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", Randy Poe, 21:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 21:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:05
Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, bennett, 21:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:00
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = > 2 + (1 / (17 - (1 / (340 - (1 / (8.5 + (1 / 51))))))) = 2.05883371//, don . lotto, 20:55
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ? continued fraction convergents//, don . lotto, 20:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:40
Re: Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, Marc, 20:36
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 20:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:22
Re: ambiguous names?, Dik T. Winter, 20:15
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 20:14
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:14
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:12
Re: ambiguous names?, Dik T. Winter, 20:09
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", Randy Poe, 19:49
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 19:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 19:44
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:44
Re: PI, Ioannis, 19:41
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 19:32
Re: courses in video, raymond manzoni, 19:29
Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, bennett, 19:28
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 19:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:25
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:22
Re: Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, José Carlos Santos, 19:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:12
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:12
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:11
Re: courses in video, Marc, 19:08
Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Self-study, Problem 1-6, Marc, 19:04
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 19:02
Re: Extending the reals, David R Tribble, 18:59
courses in video, J, 18:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:37
Re: What would a last Twin Prime possibly be? And how P-adics = Natural Numbers looks at this, Nam Nguyen, 18:33
Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, matt271829-news, 18:31
Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, Hero, 18:18
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ?, user923005, 18:11
What would a last Twin Prime possibly be? And how P-adics = Natural Numbers looks at this, a_plutonium, 17:57
Re: Extending the reals, cbrown, 17:52
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes ..., Michael Press, 17:43
Re: Method of Frobenius, G.E. Ivey, 17:37
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, toni . lassila, 17:32
Divergent summation/could someone confirm these?, Gottfried Helms, 17:30
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Nam D. Nguyen, 17:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 17:16
Re: Prime Numbers, David T. Ashley, 17:06
Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, galathaea, 17:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 17:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:54
Re: are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, Robert Israel, 16:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 16:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:49
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David Bernier, 16:48
Raymond Karczewski DID shoot a mannequin, anitakarczewski, 16:33
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Robert Israel, 16:16
Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, matt271829-news, 16:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:47
are imaginary exponents "truly" defined that way?, bennett, 15:39
Re: when fn -> f => fn' -> f', Dave L. Renfro, 15:33
Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:30
Re: when fn -> f => fn' -> f', Dave L. Renfro, 15:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:24
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ?, Robert Israel, 15:23
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero, 15:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:10
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, matt271829-news, 15:06
Re: setting the scope of Chebychev Theorem inbetween that of K->2K and that of K->K^2 indicates that Twin Primes are FINITE, a_plutonium, 14:59
Re: Proof by contradiction, Michael Press, 14:57
Re: free old books on discrete maths and/or algorithms, Nick Evans, 14:54
Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, diligent . snail, 14:44
Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, Robert Israel, 14:31
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Lester Zick, 14:09
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David C. Ullrich, 13:56
Re: ambiguous names?, Peter L. Montgomery, 13:49
Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, Randy Poe, 13:36
Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, diligent . snail, 12:55
Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, jd6strings, 12:50
Re: Leonhard Euler Tercentenary - Basel 2007, The Last Danish Pastry, 12:46
Re: help with an estimate, Jannick Asmus, 12:35
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 12:32
free old books on discrete maths and/or algorithms, emekadavid, 12:29
help with an estimate, Philips, 12:27
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Herman Rubin, 12:19
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 12:16
Re: Small set Theory:final version., MoeBlee, 12:03
Re: A matrix group, Herman Rubin, 12:03
Re: ambiguous names?, Dave Seaman, 11:58
Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:56
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David Bernier, 11:56
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Prime..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 11:55
Re: Leonhard Euler Tercentenary - Basel 2007, Lee Rudolph, 11:41
Re: A matrix group, Lee Rudolph, 11:38
Re: Prime Numbers, Quantum Ranger, 11:30
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ?, Mrs Unreliable, 11:30
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Leonard M. Wapner, 11:23
Re: ambiguous names?, Herman Rubin, 11:21
Leonhard Euler Tercentenary - Basel 2007, The Last Danish Pastry, 11:17
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Newberry, 11:15
Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Squidward Tentacles, 10:54
Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Squidward Tentacles, 10:46
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich, 10:38
Re: A matrix group, Jannick Asmus, 10:34
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David W . Cantrell, 10:26
Re: A matrix group, José Carlos Santos, 10:22
A matrix group, Hauke Reddmann, 10:16
Re: probability of at least n successes with m tries, Randy Poe, 10:15
probability of at least n successes with m tries, Patrik Stellmann, 10:02
Re: Internet Security Warning!, hagman, 09:44
Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, Nick, 09:44
Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, Nick, 09:35
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 09:08
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 09:04
Re: Equation problem, Nick, 09:01
Re: Prime Numbers, pauldepstein, 08:59
Re: ellipse, Nobody, 08:27
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", G . Frege, 07:54
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Kira Yamato, 07:45
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", Randy Poe, 07:43
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", William Elliot, 07:28
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Kira Yamato, 07:23
Re: Pop Math - Huzita-Hatori Origami constructions, Hero, 07:19
Re: Generalized Riemann Zeta Function in Mathematica, Valeri Astanoff, 07:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:12
Re: ambiguous names?, hagman, 07:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:02
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David W . Cantrell, 06:59
Re: maths gene project, Nick, 06:49
Pop Math - Huzita-Hatori Origami constructions, joshipura, 06:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:48
Re: when fn -> f => fn' -> f', David C . Ullrich, 06:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:43
Re: Internet Security Warning!, Nick, 06:42
Re: Irrational Inclusion - can irrational numbers contain other irrational numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 06:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:38
Re: ambiguous names?, Nick, 06:36
Re: Prime Numbers, William Elliot, 06:35
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich, 06:31
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich, 06:29
setting the scope of Chebychev Theorem inbetween that of K->2K and that of K->K^2 indicates that Twin Primes are FINITE, a_plutonium, 06:29
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich, 06:26
Re: ambiguous names?, Nick, 06:16
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Denis Feldmann, 06:16
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 06:04
Re: Sudoku questions, Nick, 06:01
Re: I need your help for my University dissertation, Nick, 05:54
Re: Books about groups, Nick, 05:49
Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, Nick, 05:45
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 05:36
Re: ambiguous names?, Nick, 05:36
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 05:07
Re: Prime Numbers, Proginoskes, 04:48
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Proginoskes, 04:46
Re: the neighboring primes surrounding one of these far-out Twin Primes, could evaluate whether Twin Primes are a finite set, Proginoskes, 04:42
AP's "special composites" might work: Was: Re: how all metric primes (twin, quad, hex, etc) could be finite sets, Proginoskes, 04:39
Re: Analysis on manifolds, BACH, 04:34
Prime Numbers, Quantum Ranger, 04:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 04:11
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero, 04:05
THE RAIN STOPS!, hackerlubiao@xxxxxxxxx, 03:49
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 03:48
Re: Extending the reals, hagman, 03:43
Re: when fn -> f => fn' -> f', José Carlos Santos, 03:05
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, David Bernier, 02:53
when fn -> f => fn' -> f', Diego Torquemada, 02:51
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, junoexpress, 02:46
first trial-test to see if Twin Primes are a finite or infinite set, a_plutonium, 01:36
[] a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, William Elliot, 01:27
[] Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", William Elliot, 01:23
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", PhysicsHowie, 01:16
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", William Elliot, 01:15
Re: a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, PhysicsHowie, 01:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 01:02
Generalized Riemann Zeta Function in Mathematica, junoexpress, 01:01
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:39
Re: setting the proper scope on the Chebychev Theorem to include composites of 2 and only 2 prime factors, a_plutonium, 00:31
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 00:21
Re: Extending the reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:17
the neighboring primes surrounding one of these far-out Twin Primes, could evaluate whether Twin Primes are a finite set, a_plutonium, 00:03
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 00:01

December 28, 2006

Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, jd6strings, 23:52
Re: Irrational Inclusion - can irrational numbers contain other irrational numbers?, Martin Winer, 23:47
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 23:41
Re: Dik, what is the largest know twin-primes? Re: setting the proper scope on the Chebychev Theorem, N. Silver, 23:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:27
Re: How to calculate number of possible combinations, sammyspop, 23:26
Dik, what is the largest know twin-primes? Re: setting the proper scope on the Chebychev Theorem, a_plutonium, 23:24
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ? continued fraction convergents//, don . lotto, 23:21
solve 2-order differential eqn, d2x/dt2 = 1/(1+cx.) hard? to me it isxx, don . lotto, 23:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:14
a(n) = (tan 1)(tan 2)(tan 3) . . . (tan n): Diverges?, Leonard M. Wapner, 23:04
setting the proper scope on the Chebychev Theorem to include composites of 2 and only 2 prime factors, a_plutonium, 22:52
Re: moving averages, junoexpress, 22:49
Re: 2.058833711777943011170351... = ?, N. Silver, 22:48
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 22:42
2.058833711777943011170351... = ?, Proginoskes, 22:36
Re: ambiguous names?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:29
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", Randy Poe, 22:28
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Proginoskes, 22:27
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 22:16
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 22:12
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes ..., Dik T. Winter, 22:06
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 22:06
Re: any one recognize this sequence?, Larry Hammick, 22:04
single clock circuit <-> polynomial, dillogimp, 21:57
Re: moving averages, Randy Poe, 21:57
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Dik T. Winter, 21:53
Re: Combinatorics problem, Proginoskes, 21:52
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Dik T. Winter, 21:38
Re: algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, Robert Israel, 21:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:09
Re: Small set Theory:final version., zuhair, 21:08
Re: Combinatorics problem, ptell8, 21:01
Re: Irrational Inclusion - can irrational numbers contain other irrational numbers?, Robert Israel, 20:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:47
Re: moving averages, nospam, 20:39
Re: Combinatorics problem, Butch Malahide, 20:39
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, Pmb, 20:39
Re: ambiguous names?, zxcv_890, 20:35
Spinor Qubits in Curved Space-Time, Jack Sarfatti, 20:30
Re: ambiguous names?, zxcv_890, 20:30
moving averages, Jon Slaughter, 20:27
Re: Euler Bricks in higher dimensions?, Randall, 20:27
Re: ambiguous names?, Proginoskes, 20:14
Re: ambiguous names?, Robert Israel, 20:09
Re: *** Wolfowitz owes us an explanation ***, Squidward Tentacles, 19:55
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 19:52
Re: axiom of choice from..., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 19:45
Re: ambiguous names?, Robert Israel, 19:43
Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 19:43
Re: Science project A.Maths roller-towel, frictionless toilet roll unwind T seconds., don . lotto, 19:43
Re: ambiguous names?, Kira Yamato, 19:39
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:39
Re: algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, Don Reble, 19:36
Re: algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, JoeS, 19:33
Re: ambiguous names?, Robert Israel, 19:28
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 19:18
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, JanPB, 19:08
Re: ambiguous names?, Proginoskes, 19:05
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 19:01
Re: Combinatorics problem, Proginoskes, 18:57
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, G . Frege, 18:51
Re: how all metric primes (twin, quad, hex, etc) could be finite sets, Proginoskes, 18:44
Re: ambiguous names?, G . Frege, 18:43
Re: Gauss should have realized there is a flaw in the Euclid Infini..., Proginoskes, 18:21
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes ..., Proginoskes, 18:21
Books about groups, bluelabel, 17:49
Re: an equation, Nick, 17:46
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 17:42
Re: Penrose entangled spinor nonlocal pre-geometry 1, Art Deco, 17:29
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 17:23
Re: Combinatorics problem, ptell8, 17:16
Re: Small set Theory:final version., MoeBlee, 17:12
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., MoeBlee, 16:59
Re: Irrational Inclusion - can irrational numbers contain other irrational numbers?, Gottfried Helms, 16:50
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Richard Tobin, 16:49
Re: Irrational Inclusion - can irrational numbers contain other irrational numbers?, user923005, 16:47
Re: Convergance checking of log, user923005, 16:45
Re: Convergance checking of log, user923005, 16:37
Irrational Inclusion - can irrational numbers contain other irrational numbers?, Martin Winer, 16:31
Re: free and easy number to talk things through -, Ken Pledger, 16:18
Re: is this solvable?, d&tm, 16:13
Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, Nick, 16:07
Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, Robert Israel, 15:57
Re: PI, Ken Pledger, 15:57
Re: latin squares having permutations as row differences, Ken Pledger, 15:48
Re: Convergance checking of log, user923005, 15:46
Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, carlip-nospam, 15:44
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Tw..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 15:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 15:38
Re: Convergance checking of log, user923005, 15:37
Re: ambiguous names?, Nick, 15:29
Penrose entangled spinor nonlocal pre-geometry 1, Jack Sarfatti, 15:26
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 15:25
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:16
Re: ambiguous names?, Nick, 15:13
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Tw..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 14:58
Re: Convergance checking of log, user923005, 14:55
Re: Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes has a Indirect Method but Di..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 14:36
Re: how all metric primes (twin, quad, hex, etc) could be finite sets, a_plutonium, 14:34
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 14:33
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 14:28
Convergance checking of log, stork, 14:23
how all metric primes (twin, quad, hex, etc) could be finite sets, a_plutonium, 14:20
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Tw..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 14:17
if I cannot get Chebychev theorem to work on a proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes consider them as finite, a_plutonium, 14:03
Re: I need your help for my University dissertation, hagman, 14:03
Gauss-function, derivatives & integrals(?), Gottfried Helms, 14:00
Re: Extending the reals, David R Tribble, 13:49
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Tw..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 13:47
Lasting the longest, hagen, 13:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:41
Re: axiom of choice from..., Arturo Magidin, 13:33
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 13:27
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 13:18
Re: Gauss should have realized there is a flaw in the Euclid Infini..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 13:00
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 12:50
Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes; applying Math Induction on ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 12:47
Re: ambiguous names?, David W . Cantrell, 12:40
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 12:37
Re: 22 hex-primes in interval 1-200 Re: the distribution density of twin, quad, hex, octo, deca primes22, Gerard Schildberger, 12:29
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 12:26
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, guenther vonKnakspot, 12:20
New IRC Channel: #moderncalcs, RadSurfer, 12:18
Re: What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, Michael Olea, 12:16
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 12:09
I need your help for my University dissertation, Emily, 12:06
Re: axiom of choice from..., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:03
Re: an equation, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 11:55
Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, Rainer Rosenthal, 11:45
Re: Analysis on manifolds, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 11:22
topological lemma, Philips, 11:15
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", Randy Poe, 11:12
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 10:56
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, rich burge, 10:45
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich, 10:38
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 10:20
Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, jd6strings, 09:43
Re: ambiguous names?, hagman, 09:38
Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, raymond manzoni, 09:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 09:30
Re: any one recognize this sequence?, hagman, 09:17
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 09:02
Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, Rainer Rosenthal, 08:45
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Gottfried Helms, 08:31
Re: any one recognize this sequence?, Gottfried Helms, 08:19
Re: ambiguous names?, Dave L. Renfro, 08:07
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Dave Seaman, 07:44
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", David C . Ullrich, 07:26
Re: Complex differentiable functions, David C . Ullrich, 07:23
Re: What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, William Elliot, 07:13
Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 07:12
Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 07:11
Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 07:09
Re: possible proof of the Infinitude of Twin primes, quad-primes, hex-primes etcetera, a_plutonium, 07:02
possible proof of the Infinitude of Twin primes, quad-primes, hex-primes etcetera, a_plutonium, 06:49
Re: What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, m7ossny, 06:46
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 06:43
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Nick, 06:40
Re: an equation, Nick, 06:38
Re: an equation, José Carlos Santos, 06:34
Re: dyscalculia, Nick, 06:24
Re: an equation, Nick, 06:19
Re: Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, Nick, 06:17
Re: ambiguous names?, Nick, 06:14
Dik Winter is correct, I do not have a Infinitude of Twin Primes proof using Euclid Indirect Method, a_plutonium, 06:07
Re: Analysis on manifolds, BACH, 05:13
Re: Analysis on manifolds, smn, 05:11
Re: an equation, José Carlos Santos, 05:08
Re: reverse order of integration, barrera . mauro, 05:01
Re: What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, William Elliot, 04:53
Analysis on manifolds, BACH, 04:52
Re: 22 hex-primes in interval 1-200 Re: the distribution density of twin, quad, hex, octo, deca primes22, hagman, 04:51
Re: A finite model for Peano arithmetic in some exotic logic ?, Keith Ramsay, 04:49
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", William Elliot, 04:44
Re: algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, Keith Ramsay, 04:38
22 hex-primes in interval 1-200 Re: the distribution density of twin, quad, hex, octo, deca primes22, a_plutonium, 04:17
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Saurav, 04:13
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Saurav, 04:04
Finding orthogonal trajectories, tamiry, 04:03
Re: What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, Robert Israel, 04:01
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Saurav, 03:59
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes ..., Proginoskes, 03:57
an equation, gilevgi, 03:56
Re: Series, Robert Israel, 03:49
Re: algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, Robert Israel, 03:46
Re: Science project A.Maths roller-towel, frictionless toilet roll unwind T seconds., Mark Berman, 03:23
Re: reverse order of integration, Virgil, 03:21
Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes; applying Math Induction on ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 03:20
Re: any one recognize this sequence?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:20
free and easy number to talk things through -, easyrider80, 03:00
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 02:58
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Proginoskes, 02:53
Re: any one recognize this sequence?, Larry Hammick, 02:52
reverse order of integration, rancid moth, 02:48
Re: correcting Dik Winter and Chris Heckman's Euclid Infinitude of Primes ..., Proginoskes, 02:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 02:45
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which ..., Proginoskes, 02:38
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, Proginoskes, 02:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 02:33
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 02:28
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Proginoskes, 02:18
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes ..., Proginoskes, 02:16
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 02:09
Re: axiom of choice from..., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:03
Re: JSH: Gloves Are Off, Now, Proginoskes, 02:01
the distribution density of twin, quad, hex, octo, deca primes, a_plutonium, 02:00
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Proginoskes, 01:50
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 01:46
Re: Series, Eric, 01:46
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, a_plutonium, 01:34
Re: Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster, JSH meets Cirque du Soleil, huangxienchen, 01:28
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair, 01:17
Re: Small set Theory:final version., zuhair, 01:16
Re: Divorce from Ray almost final, Google Watcher, 00:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 00:58
Re: axiom of choice from..., Saurav, 00:55
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav, 00:46
Re: correcting Dik Winter and Chris Heckman's Euclid Infinitude of Primes ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 00:41
Re: any one recognize this sequence?, Tim Peters, 00:36
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair, 00:27
Re: any one recognize this sequence?, amzoti, 00:26
Re: any one recognize this sequence?, Larry Hammick, 00:20
Re: any one recognize this sequence?, dillogimp, 00:11

December 27, 2006

Divorce from Ray almost final, anitakarczewski, 23:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 23:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 23:48
Solving a * 0 = 0 Plankenstein Monster "IT'S ALLLLiiiiiivvvvvvvve !!!", huangxienchen, 23:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 23:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 23:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 23:38
Re: any one recognize this sequence?, Larry Hammick, 23:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 23:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 23:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 23:21
Re: general gre math question, john, 23:09
Re: general gre math question, john, 23:03
Re: axiom of choice from..., Arturo Magidin, 23:00
Re: algebra with cyclic and normal., Arturo Magidin, 22:56
Re: axiom of choice from..., Arturo Magidin, 22:54
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Dik T. Winter, 22:37
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, Ken S. Tucker, 22:30
Science project A.Maths roller-towel, frictionless toilet roll unwind T seconds., don . lotto, 22:24
Re: JSH: Gloves Are Off, Now, junoexpress, 22:22
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 22:12
any one recognize this sequence?, dillogimp, 22:11
Re: JSH: Dumb as rocks, Wayne Brown, 22:10
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, JanPB, 22:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 22:05
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:55
Re: Numerical Integration Question, junoexpress, 21:53
Re: general gre math question, kellrobinson, 21:52
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, JanPB, 21:49
Re: dyscalculia, kellrobinson, 21:38
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Dik T. Winter, 21:19
Re: Extending the reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:16
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:02
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Randy Poe, 21:00
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, JanPB, 21:00
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Andrew Usher, 20:55
Re: Complex differentiable functions, Jannick Asmus, 20:49
Re: Complex differentiable functions, Kira Yamato, 20:48
Re: Riemann surface and its topology, Lee Rudolph, 20:44
Complex differentiable functions, tamiry, 20:41
Re: ambiguous names?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:39
Re: differentiating the polar coordinate r, tamiry, 20:38
Re: Numerical Integration Question, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:38
Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 20:34
Re: ambiguous names?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:29
Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, raymond manzoni, 20:29
Re: Smooth manifolds, topology and basis, Luigi Malagò, 20:25
ambiguous names?, zxcv_890, 20:18
Re: log|x| locally integrable, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:12
Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 20:11
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:04
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:03
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 20:00
log|x| locally integrable, boris, 19:58
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 19:57
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 19:56
Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 19:56
Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 19:44
Re: The proof of mass vector., yen, ka-in, 19:44
Re: The proof of mass vector., yen, ka-in, 19:42
Determining which percentage of a sample belongs to a sample set, jd6strings, 19:41
Re: Riemann surface and its topology, singau, 19:33
What are the design issues for a mathematical operator?, m7ossny, 19:29
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:20
Re: Can you do for 18sec, try!!, Nick, 19:14
Re: Proof by contradiction, Nick, 19:11
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, Pmb, 19:08
Re: algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, galathaea, 19:06
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, Ken S. Tucker, 19:05
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:02
Re: JSH: Gloves Are Off, Now, Richard Tobin, 19:00
Re: Permutation of maximum cycle, Butch Malahide, 18:54
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, Pmb, 18:53
Re: Extending the reals, David R Tribble, 18:50
Can you do for 18sec, try!!, Anton11, 18:46
Re: JSH: Gloves Are Off, Now, Math1723, 18:44
Re: Article in Scientific American, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 18:41
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Butch Malahide, 18:40
Re: JSH: Gloves Are Off, Now, Jonathan Hoyle, 18:37
Re: Riemann surface and its topology, Lee Rudolph, 18:35
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Dave Seaman, 18:28
Choice, galathaea, 18:28
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Butch Malahide, 18:27
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, Ken S. Tucker, 18:26
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Dave Seaman, 18:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:12
algebraic order of cyclotomic numbers, Don Reble, 18:11
Re: 4 8 15 16 23 42 Aproximate Pi, fred . zakity, 18:06
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, JanPB, 18:01
Riemann surface and its topology, singau, 18:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:58
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:51
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Randy Poe, 17:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:40
Re: How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Ikar, 17:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 17:02
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 17:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:57
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, Ken S. Tucker, 16:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:45
Re: How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Bob Mathews, 16:40
Re: is this solvable?, abdulai, 16:39
Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 16:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:34
Numerical Integration Question, junoexpress, 16:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:29
Re: Extending the reals, cbrown, 16:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:20
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Richard Tobin, 16:19
Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:14
Re: general gre math question, Michael Press, 16:12
Re: PI, Rob Johnson, 15:48
Gradent conceptualization idea, Jon Slaughter, 15:38
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Lee Rudolph, 15:28
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich, 15:28
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich, 15:26
Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 15:23
Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 15:21
Re: Extending the reals, Denis Feldmann, 15:13
Re: How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Ikar, 15:04
Re: PI, T.H. Ray, 15:03
Re: tangent bundle, Jannick Asmus, 14:53
Re: about tangent space at a point, Jannick Asmus, 14:50
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero, 14:48
Re: Jech's Set Theory, aatu . koskensilta, 14:36
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, David R Tribble, 14:34
Extending the reals, David R Tribble, 14:24
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero, 14:18
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 14:17
Re: is this solvable?, Randy Poe, 14:08
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 13:40
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Gon�alo Rodrigues, 13:35
is this solvable?, d&tm, 13:17
Re: Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes has a Indirect Method but Direct Method is unattainable, a_plutonium, 13:13
J. London Math. Society is digitized, Dave L. Renfro, 13:01
Re: Integral, N. Silver, 12:53
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Butch Malahide, 12:52
RM3 logic ?, 2Pac, 12:50
Re: Integral, N. Silver, 12:44
Re: Integral, José Carlos Santos, 12:40
Integral, Joris, 12:34
Re: How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Ikar, 12:32
Re: Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes has a Indirect Method but Direct Method is unattainable, hagman, 12:29
Re: How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Ikar, 12:19
Re: Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes has a Indirect Method but Direct Method is unattainable, a_plutonium, 12:09
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, hagman, 12:07
Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes has a Indirect Method but Direct Method is unattainable, a_plutonium, 12:03
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes ..., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 12:02
Re: tangent bundle, Philips, 12:00
Re: about tangent space at a point, Philips, 11:40
Re: How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Bob Mathews, 11:40
Re: Riemann's Hypothesis, Larry Hammick, 11:35
Re: tangent bundle, Valeriu Anisiu, 11:32
Re: Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, David Marcus, 11:29
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, David Marcus, 11:27
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Kira Yamato, 11:23
Re: Riemann's Hypothesis, David Marcus, 11:14
Re: about tangent space at a point, Dave L. Renfro, 11:10
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 11:07
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 11:02
Re: about tangent space at a point, Jannick Asmus, 11:00
Riemann's Hypothesis, Srinidhi, 10:57
about tangent space at a point, Philips, 10:49
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, mathedman, 10:45
Re: PI, Saurav, 10:33
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Randy Poe, 10:29
Re: Uncountable numbers?, saurav1b, 10:23
Re: axiom of choice from..., saurav1b, 10:09
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 10:01
How to turn of auto-updating eq.numbering in MathType 5.0, Ikar, 09:43
Re: algebra with cyclic and normal., hagman, 09:42
Re: About 3n+1 problem, Bob Kolker, 09:37
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Lee Rudolph, 09:19
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave Seaman, 09:14
Re: Multiple Reflections in Ellipse, h . rehn, 09:03
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich, 09:01
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich, 09:00
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich, 08:59
Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 08:57
Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 08:54
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, matt271829-news, 08:53
Re: Proof by contradiction, Dave Seaman, 08:52
Re: About 3n+1 problem, kilian heckrodt, 08:27
[] About 3n+1 problem, William Elliot, 07:51
Statistica Sinica -- theme issue on statistical challenges in brain science, Statistica Sinica, 07:33
Re: a b o u t transversality, Jannick Asmus, 07:31
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 07:29
Re: Computing Euler's totient function, Valeri Astanoff, 07:20
About 3n+1 problem, babu, 07:16
Re: axiom of choice from..., William Elliot, 07:14
Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, T.H. Ray, 06:33
Re: How can I order a aggregation of items from multiple lists, kunzmilan, 06:32
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Hero, 06:16
Re: tangent bundle, Jannick Asmus, 05:37
Re: Permutation of maximum cycle, Derek Holt, 05:16
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, William Elliot, 05:10
[] diophantine eq., William Elliot, 05:07
Re: Computing Euler's totient function, Michael Harrington, 05:03
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 05:01
Re: algebra with cyclic and normal., Tonico, 04:50
Re: algebra with cyclic and normal., mina_world, 04:46
Re: Computing Euler's totient function, Valeri Astanoff, 04:40
Re: algebra with cyclic and normal., Kira Yamato, 04:33
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, kunzmilan, 04:24
Re: Permutation of maximum cycle, hagman, 04:22
Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, stork, 04:16
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Michael Press, 04:12
Re: Logarithmic Spirals, Andrew Usher, 04:11
algebra with cyclic and normal., mina_world, 04:09
Re: Proof by contradiction, Andrew Usher, 04:05
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Michael Press, 04:05
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Proginoskes, 03:42
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Proginoskes, 03:38
AP admits he's doing fake proofs: Was: Re: Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, Proginoskes, 03:31
axiom of choice from..., Saurav, 03:27
Re: Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 03:22
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, a_plutonium, 03:10
Re: Computing Euler's totient function, Tonico, 03:08
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, a_plutonium, 02:53
Re: Computing Euler's totient function, Robert Mabee, 02:41
Re: JSH: Gloves Are Off, Now, W. Dale Hall, 02:21
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, Proginoskes, 02:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 02:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 01:51
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, David Marcus, 01:40
Computing Euler's totient function, Protoman, 01:40
Permutation of maximum cycle, vincent64@xxxxxxxxx, 01:38
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, David Marcus, 01:37
Re: Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, David Marcus, 01:32
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Proginoskes, 01:28
Re: PI, The World Wide Wade, 01:04
Re: PI, Cary, 01:03
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Proginoskes, 01:03
Re: JSH: TurdVision 101 Operational instructions versus numbers, Proginoskes, 00:59
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Keith Ramsay, 00:59
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, Proginoskes, 00:56
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Gc, 00:53
Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, ashisht4u, 00:29
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav, 00:27
Re: Sum of a series ..., Hassan Jameel, 00:13
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, Virgil, 00:00

December 26, 2006

Re: Uncountable numbers?, Virgil, 23:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:48
Re: satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, Dik T. Winter, 23:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:43
Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil, 23:39
Small set Theory:final version., zuhair, 23:29
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., saurav1b, 23:23
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Gc, 23:21
Re: PI, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:18
Re: PI, Larry Hammick, 23:11
Re: The unimportance of decimal arithmetic ability, Michael Press, 23:10
Re: Proof by contradiction, William Elliot, 23:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 23:05
PI, Charlie Johnson, 23:04
Re: A finite model for Peano arithmetic in some exotic logic ?, Jason H. Goodfriend, 23:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 23:01
Re: Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 22:59
Re: Series, Robert Israel, 22:55
Re: Is continuum completely filled up?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 22:50
satisfying Dik Winter's objection Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes;, a_plutonium, 22:48
Re: Proof by contradiction, David Marcus, 22:48
Re: Proof by contradiction, David Marcus, 22:47
Re: A finite model for Peano arithmetic in some exotic logic ?, William Elliot, 22:45
Re: Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, David Marcus, 22:37
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 22:32
Re: Gloves Are Off, Now, Luc The Perverse, 22:30
a bogdanov sickness, galathaea, 22:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 22:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 22:08
Gauss should have realized there is a flaw in the Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 22:08
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 22:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 22:02
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Gib Bogle, 21:49
Anyone heard of Compound Methods of Proof or Reiterative Math Induction?; Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 21:46
JSH: Gloves Are Off, Now, jsteuh@xxxxxxx, 21:37
Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes; applying Math Induction on Dik Winter's format, Dik T. Winter, 21:28
Is continuum completely filled up?, ooo, 21:19
Re: don-fact 1.580+billion divides (1e9)^(1e9) +3., don . lotto, 21:13
don-fact 1.580+billion divides (1e9)^(1e9) +3., don . lotto, 21:00
Series, Eric, 20:19
Re: Proof by contradiction, Dik T. Winter, 20:18
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 20:04
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 19:50
Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 19:48
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:48
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:44
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:39
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:31
Re: Proof by contradiction, Nick, 19:27
Re: Equation problem, Nick, 19:24
Re: dyscalculia, elly, 19:18
Re: dyscalculia, Nick, 19:15
Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, Rainer Rosenthal, 19:03
Re: JSH: Operational instructions versus numbers, litsohate, 18:39
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, N. Silver, 18:37
Re: Proof by contradiction, Bob Kolker, 18:27
dyscalculia, joana.moreira, 18:27
Re: latin squares having permutations as row differences, andy, 18:26
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Michael Press, 18:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 18:14
Re: Least Squares Vector Problem, matt271829-news, 18:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 18:09
Re: latin squares having permutations as row differences, Randy Poe, 17:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:25
Re: Proof by contradiction, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:24
Re: A Number Theory problem., Daniel Mayost, 17:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:17
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:08
latin squares having permutations as row differences, andy, 17:06
re: Total energy of the universe - TYPO, Jack Sarfatti, 16:59
The total energy of the universe is not conserved, Jack Sarfatti, 16:46
Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, raymond manzoni, 16:44
Re: bundles, Philips, 16:41
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Butch Malahide, 16:34
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Ross A. Finlayson, 16:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 16:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 16:10
Encode freq. in waveform, Mark Waugh, 16:09
Re: Linear Programming Problem..., FiftySix, 16:04
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Butch Malahide, 15:55
Re: Maximal triangle, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:41
Re: A Number Theory problem., Michael, 15:38
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:38
Re: bundles, conesetter, 15:32
Re: Linear Programming Problem..., FiftySix, 15:30
[Exercise] Double cosets, bluelabel, 15:24
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:22
Re: A Number Theory problem., Michael, 15:14
Re: A Number Theory problem., christian.bau, 15:14
Re: Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:10
Re: A Number Theory problem., Daniel Mayost, 15:04
Re: proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes; applying Math Induction on Dik Winter's format, a_plutonium, 14:56
proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes; applying Math Induction on Dik Winter's format, a_plutonium, 14:48
Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, Virgil, 14:40
Re: Sum of a series ..., Daniel Mayost, 14:24
Re: Article in Scientific American, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 14:21
A Number Theory problem., science guy, 14:16
Re: general gre math question, Michael, 14:13
Re: Looking for quaternion calculator, Ioannis, 13:58
Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, Randy Poe, 13:52
Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil, 13:45
Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, science guy, 13:43
Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, science guy, 13:42
Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil, 13:41
Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil, 13:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 13:36
Re: Proof by contradiction, Randy Poe, 13:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 13:32
Re: Sum of a series ..., Daniel Mayost, 13:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:26
Re: Looking for quaternion calculator, Daniel al-Autistiqui, 13:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:16
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, matt271829-news, 13:14
Re: Logarithmic Spirals, Robert Israel, 13:11
Re: Proof by contradiction, fernando revilla, 13:05
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:53
Re: general gre math question, Prawt, 12:50
Re: n(3n-11)=k^2, raymond manzoni, 12:38
Re: Least Squares Vector Problem, David T. Ashley, 12:31
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 12:20
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Keith Ramsay, 12:14
Re: n(3n-11)=k^2 (was: n (n + 1)), Peter L. Montgomery, 12:11
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Kira Yamato, 12:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 11:44
Re: Article in Scientific American, T.H. Ray, 11:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 11:40
Re: Another Galois theory question, Derek Holt, 11:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 11:33
Ranking scheme using partial set amalgamation, Brablo, 11:28
Re: bundles, Lee Rudolph, 11:22
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair, 11:03
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair, 11:01
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 10:45
Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, Prawt, 10:34
Re: Article in Scientific American, Chris Smith, 10:27
Re: bundles, Philips, 10:24
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:20
Re: JSH: TurdVision 101 Operational instructions versus numbers, Harvy Resiling, 10:13
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, Harvy Resiling, 10:08
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:07
Re: A finite model for Peano arithmetic in some exotic logic ?, 2Pac, 09:53
Re: Proof of associative law of addition, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:36
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Randy Poe, 09:28
Re: Proof by contradiction, Bob Kolker, 09:27
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich, 09:26
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, David C . Ullrich, 09:25
Equation problem, zaheer7buet, 09:25
Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 09:14
Re: Uncountable numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 09:13
Re: Proof by contradiction, Bob Kolker, 09:12
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Gon�alo Rodrigues, 09:07
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Gon�alo Rodrigues, 09:00
Re: bundles, Bob Kolker, 09:00
Re: Logarithmic Spirals, Peter Webb, 08:55
Re: Proof by contradiction, Berk Birand, 08:32
Re: Proof of associative law of addition, Berk Birand, 08:16
Re: Least Squares Vector Problem, toni . lassila, 08:16
Re: Article in Scientific American, luiroto, 08:00
Re: general gre math question, Randy Poe, 07:54
Re: (geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, Tonico, 07:49
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro, 07:43
Sum of a series ..., Hassan Jameel, 07:41
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Kira Yamato, 07:29
(geometric problem) Explain with the proper equation, ashisht4u, 07:26
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro, 07:14
Re: Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Dave L. Renfro, 07:10
Re: FLTAA: Field structure p = 2, p>2, The Dougster, 07:07
Another Galois theory question, Rupert, 07:04
Re: general gre math question, Kira Yamato, 06:59
bundles, Philips, 06:44
general gre math question, john, 06:38
Coefficient Inverse Problem, Maka Karalashvili, 06:23
Study Abroad, Harry, 06:21
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes reductio ad absurdum, sttscitrans, 06:15
Union of a family of comparable measurable sets is measurable?, Kamjah Kogumah, 06:12
n(3n-11)=k^2 (was: n (n + 1)), Rainer Rosenthal, 05:48
Re: ANR spaces, Zbigniew Karno, 05:33
Re: ANR spaces, Zbigniew Karno, 05:30
Re: Proof by contradiction, G . Frege, 03:54
how Euclid Infinitude of Primes Indirect Method leads to a proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes, a_plutonium, 03:51
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Gc, 03:50
Not Commission , guranteed Income on-line., Alam, 03:24
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes reductio ad absurdum, a_plutonium, 03:21
Re: How to calculate number of possible combinations, Kira Yamato, 03:10
Re: Article in Scientific American, T.H. Ray, 03:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 02:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 02:46
Re: Proof by contradiction, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:41
Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil, 02:17
A New Idea: "Transproof", Saurav, 02:16
Re: Proof by contradiction, N. Silver, 02:15
Least Squares Vector Problem, David T. Ashley, 02:15
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, Proginoskes, 02:14
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 01:58
Re: How to calculate number of possible combinations, Proginoskes, 01:57
Re: density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true, Proginoskes, 01:53
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, Proginoskes, 01:49
Re: Proof by contradiction, Andrew Usher, 01:38
Re: symmetry in mathematics should alert us that a prime factor search is not possible for both direct and indirect Euclid Infinitude of Primes Re: correcting Dik Winter and Chris Heckman's Euclid Infinitude of Primes attempt Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, Proginoskes, 01:36
Re: correcting Dik Winter and Chris Heckman's Euclid Infinitude of Primes attempt Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, Proginoskes, 01:34
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Virgil, 01:31
Re: Using PARI, Aatu Koskensilta, 01:24
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Virgil, 01:24
Re: Using PARI, Rupert, 01:23
Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil, 01:22
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes reductio ad absurdum, Tonico, 01:20
Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil, 01:15
How to calculate number of possible combinations, Leo Muller, 01:14
Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Proginoskes, 01:12
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Proginoskes, 01:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:03
Using PARI, Rupert, 01:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:58
Re: diophantine eq., Ashay Burungale, 00:51
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav, 00:46
Re: Logarithmic Spirals, Andrew Usher, 00:29
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav, 00:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 00:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 00:16
Re: Logarithmic Spirals, Robert Israel, 00:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 00:06
Re: n (n + 1), bill, 00:00

December 25, 2006

Re: Gradient, Robert Israel, 23:46
Re: Proof by contradiction, Aatu Koskensilta, 23:43
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Aatu Koskensilta, 23:37
Re: Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:36
Re: Proof by contradiction, Andrew Usher, 23:34
Re: Uncountable numbers?, Aatu Koskensilta, 23:33
Re: Proof by contradiction, Aatu Koskensilta, 23:32
Re: Proof by contradiction, Andrew Usher, 23:31
Uncountable numbers?, Andrew Usher, 23:29
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 23:19
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 23:13
Re: Proof by contradiction, Virgil, 23:10
Re: Proof by contradiction, William Elliot, 23:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:03
Re: density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true, Phineas T Puddleduck, 23:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 22:57
Re: Proof by contradiction, N. Silver, 22:45
Re: Article in Scientific American, Chris Smith, 22:44
Proof by contradiction, Andrew Usher, 22:32
Re: density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true, a_plutonium, 22:30
Re: Logarithmic Spirals, Andrew Usher, 22:30
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, matt271829-news, 22:24
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair, 22:23
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes reductio ad absurdum, a_plutonium, 22:22
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair, 22:21
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Rupert, 21:55
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Rupert, 21:49
Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:47
Re: A finite model for Peano arithmetic in some exotic logic ?, William Elliot, 21:30
Re: n (n + 1), Peter L. Montgomery, 21:28
Re: Gradient, William Elliot, 21:21
Re: Dumb as rocks, Karenia Brevis, 21:15
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Jesse F. Hughes, 21:12
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 21:12
Re: The conical inverse, Narasimham, 21:05
Gradient, Eric, 21:05
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:47
Re: n (n + 1), Bob Kolker, 20:47
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Kira Yamato, 20:32
Re: n (n + 1), Dik T. Winter, 20:29
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 20:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 20:10
Re: Maximal triangle, precarion, 20:04
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, Peter_Smith, 20:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 19:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 19:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:35
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Peter Webb, 19:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:16
Re: correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes reductio ad absurdum, Dik T. Winter, 19:12
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, sg552, 19:09
Re: Article in Scientific American, Ioannis, 19:09
Re: Maximal triangle, Thomas Mautsch, 19:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 19:03
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Jesse F. Hughes, 18:55
Re: Computing sets of formulae, Trav, 18:47
Re: Computing sets of formulae, Trav, 18:46
Re: Series, Badger, 18:35
Re: Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, Costas Vlachos, 18:33
Curvature from dark energy/dark matter ZPF torsion fields, Jack Sarfatti, 18:19
A finite model for Peano arithmetic in some exotic logic ?, 2Pac, 18:15
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Gib Bogle, 18:10
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Red, 18:05
Re: On finite reflection groups, Derek Holt, 17:57
Re: Series, Ioannis, 17:56
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Hero, 17:54
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, N. Silver, 17:42
Re: density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true, T Wake, 17:33
Re: n (n + 1), fernando revilla, 17:31
Re: Series, Badger, 17:26
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 17:24
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:14
Re: n (n + 1), fernando revilla, 17:08
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 17:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 17:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:58
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 16:58
Re: Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, louis, 16:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:42
Re: density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:37
Re: diophantine eq., Robert Israel, 16:30
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:27
Re: Series, Ioannis, 16:21
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 16:12
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 16:10
Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Ioannis, 16:05
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Tim Peters, 15:57
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 15:57
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 15:52
Re: Article in Scientific American, T.H. Ray, 15:49
density of galaxies such as Sloan Great Wall can decide whether Atom Totality or Big Bang are true, a_plutonium, 15:38
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 15:27
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, Tonico, 15:20
correcting Dik Winter's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes reductio ad absurdum, a_plutonium, 15:14
\, John Jones, 15:13
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 15:12
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, willo_thewisp, 15:10
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 15:07
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 15:00
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Timothy Murphy, 15:00
Re: On finite reflection groups, Timothy Murphy, 14:56
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, a_plutonium, 14:50
Re: is subtraction of subspaces defined?, fernando revilla, 14:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 14:44
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 14:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 14:41
Re: ANR spaces, ddaniel . lopez, 14:41
Re: Sports seeding, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:36
n (n + 1), Prawt, 14:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 14:28
Re: Proof of associative law of addition, Prawt, 14:24
Sports seeding, john0714@xxxxxxx, 14:15
Re: Computing sets of formulae, David Wagner, 13:55
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, matt271829-news, 13:43
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, David Bernier, 13:32
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 13:22
Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, BaldinPramer, 13:18
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, BaldinPramer, 13:17
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 13:05
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 12:45
does positive K-S entropy imply mixing?, Charlotte, 12:40
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, N. Silver, 12:31
a b o u t transversality, Philips, 12:29
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, a_plutonium, 12:25
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, David C . Ullrich, 12:18
Re: Specialised Highschools for Mathematics and Physics?, N. Silver, 12:18
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 12:05
Re: JSH: Dumb as rocks, Karenia Brevis, 12:04
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 11:45
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Herman Rubin, 10:54
Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, Costas Vlachos, 10:50
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, Richard Tobin, 10:49
Re: Specialised Highschools for Mathematics and Physics?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:48
Re: Article in Scientific American, Chris Smith, 10:47
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Herman Rubin, 10:42
Re: Specialised Highschools for Mathematics and Physics?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:42
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Martin Winer, 10:36
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, David C . Ullrich, 10:34
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, Larry Hammick, 10:33
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 10:30
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), luiroto, 10:17
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Bob Kolker, 10:17
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Peter Webb, 10:14
Control Chart, surjit, 10:14
Re: The proof of mass vector., Pmb, 10:01
Re: JSH: Dumb as rocks, Victor Eijkhout, 09:56
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:45
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, pierrecharland, 09:37
Re: Erdos' unfinished work, Bart Goddard, 09:36
Gray Codes & Hamiltonian Circuits, Costas Vlachos, 09:30
Re: On finite reflection groups, Timothy Murphy, 09:19
Re: On finite reflection groups, Lee Rudolph, 09:16
Re: On finite reflection groups, Timothy Murphy, 09:00
Erdos' unfinished work, Erdos Groupie, 08:23
Re: Article in Scientific American, T.H. Ray, 08:00
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Rupert, 07:53
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 07:53
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Jannick Asmus, 07:45
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 07:43
Re: Proof of associative law of addition, Dirk Van de moortel, 07:27
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Lee Rudolph, 07:22
Re: Proof of associative law of addition, Rupert, 07:22
Proof of associative law of addition, Berk Birand, 07:10
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, Bob Kolker, 07:04
Re: Series, David C . Ullrich, 07:01
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Rupert, 06:59
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, David C . Ullrich, 06:58
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, David C . Ullrich, 06:56
Re: is subtraction of subspaces defined?, David C . Ullrich, 06:52
Re: Computing sets of formulae, David C . Ullrich, 06:49
Re: phep, a_plutonium, 06:26
phip, John Jones, 06:20
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Kira Yamato, 06:19
Re: Dilworth's Easy Theorem, William Elliot, 06:17
symmetry in mathematics should alert us that a prime factor search is not possible for both direct and indirect Euclid Infinitude of Primes Re: correcting Dik Winter and Chris Heckman's Euclid Infinitude of Primes attempt Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, a_plutonium, 06:16
phep, John Jones, 06:10
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, David C . Ullrich, 05:56
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, a_plutonium, 05:43
Re: another general GRE math problem, Kira Yamato, 05:33
Re: ANR spaces, Zbigniew Karno, 05:31
correcting Dik Winter and Chris Heckman's Euclid Infinitude of Primes attempt Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, a_plutonium, 05:29
Re: another general GRE math problem, karl, 05:03
another general GRE math problem, john, 04:56
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Rupert, 04:56
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Rupert, 04:49
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, W. Dale Hall, 04:43
Re: Specialised Highschools for Mathematics and Physics?, William Elliot, 04:41
Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Rupert, 04:38
[] diophantine eq., William Elliot, 04:38
To Love a Christ, anitakarczewski, 04:37
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, G Patel, 04:30
Re: Dilworth's Easy Theorem, Butch Malahide, 04:24
diophantine eq., Ashay Burungale, 04:18
Specialised Highschools for Mathematics and Physics?, canadian . in . kirov, 04:15
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 03:41
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Saurav, 03:34
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, Tonico, 03:11
Re: World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, Proginoskes, 03:09
Re: On finite reflection groups, Jim Heckman, 03:05
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, G . Frege, 02:55
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, Proginoskes, 02:46
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Proginoskes, 02:02
Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Proginoskes, 01:54
Re: is subtraction of subspaces defined?, Proginoskes, 01:49
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, Gib Bogle, 01:47
Re: JSH: TurdVision 101 Operational instructions versus numbers, Proginoskes, 01:44
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, Rupert, 01:43
Re: JSH: Operational instructions versus numbers, Proginoskes, 01:41
Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, Rupert, 01:36
Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, Red, 01:20
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jshsucks, 00:53
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 00:27
Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, jshsucks, 00:25
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, jshsucks, 00:19
Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, jstevh, 00:17
Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 00:14
Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Robert Israel, 00:14
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jshsucks, 00:10
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, jstevh, 00:10
Re: The proof of mass vector., Sam Wormley, 00:09

December 24, 2006

Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 23:58
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, Larry Hammick, 23:45
World's first valid proof of Euclid Infinitude of Primes which opens up a avenue to easily prove Infinitude of Twin Primes Re: correcting Euclid, a_plutonium, 23:36
Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, Rupert, 23:36
Re: The proof of mass vector., yen, ka-in, 23:33
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, Rupert, 23:33
Re: JSH: TurdVision 101 Operational instructions versus numbers, louis, 23:28
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, louis, 23:26
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, Larry Hammick, 23:25
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:23
Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, Red, 23:20
Re: correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, louis, 23:19
Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, louis, 23:12
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, louis, 23:00
correcting Euclid's proof of the Infinitude of Primes which leads to an easy proof of the Infinitude of Twin Primes; both Dik Winter and Chris Heckman have failed attempts, a_plutonium, 22:56
Re: Series, Cary, 22:53
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 22:25
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Rupert, 22:24
Galois theory question, Rupert, 22:21
Re: On finite reflection groups, Dik T. Winter, 22:14
Re: Series, William Elliot, 21:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:49
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, Paul Sperry, 21:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 21:47
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 21:30
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, sg552, 21:26
Re: video, kilian heckrodt, 21:26
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, sg552, 21:16
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, sg552, 21:05
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 20:58
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 20:55
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, jshsucks, 20:50
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, willo_thewisp, 20:50
Re: JSH: TurdVision 101 Operational instructions versus numbers, Larry Hammick, 20:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 20:42
Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, jshsucks, 20:42
Series, Eric, 20:41
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, jstevh, 20:40
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, jstevh, 20:33
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, N. Silver, 20:30
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, sg552, 20:27
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, jstevh, 20:25
Re: Article in Scientific American, Christer Ericson, 20:22
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, sg552, 20:17
Re: Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:17
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, jstevh, 20:14
Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, jstevh, 20:13
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, Lee Rudolph, 20:07
Re: JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, jstevh, 20:07
Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, sg552, 20:06
Progress in prime number theory, Dilip, 20:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:45
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, bennett, 19:44
Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Ioannis, 19:22
Re: Article in Scientific American, Ioannis, 19:06
Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Randy Poe, 19:01
Re: A different version of the Maximal Triangle Problem, precarion, 18:50
Re: Maximal triangle, precarion, 18:45
multivariate extreme value distribution, andrubuntu, 18:33
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, matt271829-news, 18:31
Re: A different version of the Maximal Triangle Problem, matt271829-news, 18:22
Re: Maximal triangle, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:50
Re: Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:47
Re: Maximal triangle, matt271829-news, 17:41
Re: Dumb as rocks, louis, 17:40
Re: differentiating the polar coordinate r, Michael Press, 17:39
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, louis, 17:36
Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Ioannis, 16:55
Re: Dumb as rocks, N. Silver, 16:53
Re: independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, mathman, 16:40
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:29
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Aatu Koskensilta, 16:28
3D Modeling in Mathematica, Rick Davis, 16:11
Re: JSH: Dumb as rocks, D.Michael, 16:04
Re: JSH: Dumb as rocks, D.Michael, 15:59
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, Tonico, 15:51
ANR spaces, ddaniel . lopez, 15:46
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, jstevh, 15:40
Re: JSH: Dumb as rocks, jshsucks, 15:36
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, sg552, 15:36
Re: Article in Scientific American, galathaea, 15:35
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 15:30
JSH: Dumb as rocks, jstevh, 15:27
Re: example of Banach space needed, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:25
Curvature, dick . fischbeck, 15:23
Re: ask, David C . Ullrich, 15:18
Re: ask, Robert Israel, 15:18
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 15:17
Re: Re-visiting planet Contrary, louis, 15:13
Re: JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, jshsucks, 15:12
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, sg552, 15:01
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:54
JSH: Re-visiting planet Contrary, jstevh, 14:54
Re: Computing sets of formulae, David Wagner, 14:41
JSH: Generalized non-polynomial factorization, jstevh, 14:28
Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Tim Peters, 14:21
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, louis, 14:17
Re: JSH: TurdVision 101 Operational instructions versus numbers, louis, 14:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:50
Re: JSH: Operational instructions versus numbers, Lord Protector, 13:44
Re: JSH: Operational instructions versus numbers, Lord Protector, 13:39
ask, Philips, 13:35
independence of parallel postulate -- why isn't it this easy?, bennett, 13:34
JSH: Operational instructions versus numbers, jstevh, 13:27
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 13:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:15
Re: whether Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall are contiguous Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 13:13
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 13:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, David R Tribble, 12:16
Re: Article in Scientific American, John Coleman, 12:14
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 12:10
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Martin Winer, 12:09
Re: help with a definition: homotopy equivalence, Philips, 11:53
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 11:49
Re: help with a definition: homotopy equivalence, David C . Ullrich, 11:23
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, David C . Ullrich, 11:17
Re: human markov chain behaviour, John Bailey, 11:10
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 11:08
Re: Article in Scientific American, Bob Kolker, 11:05
Re: Article in Scientific American, Chris Smith, 11:03
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 10:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 10:53
Re: Article in Scientific American, John Coleman, 10:48
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 10:48
Re: Article in Scientific American, Chris Smith, 10:45
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Martin Winer, 10:41
Re: Perspective is weird, louis, 10:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 10:37
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 10:26
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:08
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Jannick Asmus, 10:07
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 10:03
Re: Article in Scientific American, Bob Kolker, 09:59
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 09:42
RING RING RING Dashing through the wind, In a four dog dragged sleigh. Oh the street we go, laughing all the way, Mathematician, 09:26
Re: help with a definition: homotopy equivalence, Philips, 09:23
Re: The unimportance of decimal arithmetic ability, Nick, 09:16
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Nick, 09:09
Re: help with a definition: homotopy equivalence, Saurav, 09:05
Re: human markov chain behaviour, Sam Wormley, 09:05
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, zahc1616, 09:01
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Saurav, 08:59
Re: [] multiplier,abstract or not?, zahc1616, 08:54
Re: help with a definition: homotopy equivalence, David C . Ullrich, 08:53
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, David C . Ullrich, 08:47
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, David C . Ullrich, 08:42
Re: Differentiating complex conjugate in respect to the complex, David C . Ullrich, 08:33
Re: is subtraction of subspaces defined?, David C . Ullrich, 08:29
Re: Computing sets of formulae, David C . Ullrich, 08:27
Re: On finite reflection groups, Timothy Murphy, 08:26
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 08:23
Re: example of Banach space needed, David C . Ullrich, 08:23
Re: example of Banach space needed, David C . Ullrich, 08:16
Re: Article in Scientific American, John Coleman, 08:12
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Timothy Murphy, 08:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:09
Dilworth's Easy Theorem, William Elliot, 07:59
Re: Vector Product- A clarification, William Elliot, 07:57
Predicting the direction of precession, Farooq W, 07:43
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, N. Silver, 07:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:25
Vector Product- A clarification, Farooq W, 07:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:08
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, David C . Ullrich, 07:03
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 06:32
Re: MONKEY UNDER CHRISTMAS TREE, William Elliot, 06:21
Re: human markov chain behaviour, CBFalconer, 06:00
help with a definition: homotopy equivalence, Philips, 05:56
Re: Data stream on search engine -- A challenge, William Elliot, 05:52
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, �a\\/b, 05:48
MONKEY UNDER CHRISTMAS TREE, Mathematician, 05:28
Data stream on search engine -- A challenge, Mathematician, 05:27
Re: video, Mathematician, 05:21
Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Larry Hammick, 05:19
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 05:00
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, john, 04:57
Re: example of Banach space needed, Valeriu Anisiu, 04:52
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Ross A. Finlayson, 04:51
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Ross A. Finlayson, 04:42
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Kira Yamato, 04:39
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, �a\\/b, 04:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:34
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, apoorv, 04:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:30
Re: The unimportance of decimal arithmetic ability, john, 04:30
Re: Sub Spaces:V1+V3=V2+V3?, tomerdr, 04:26
Re: video, kilian heckrodt, 04:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 04:06
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 04:04
Re: LATEX command, José Carlos Santos, 04:01
Re: example of Banach space needed, Jannick Asmus, 03:59
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot, 03:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 03:58
Re: human markov chain behaviour, mmeron, 03:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 03:47
Re: human markov chain behaviour, Richard Heathfield, 03:41
LATEX command, Saurav, 03:39
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Jannick Asmus, 03:38
Re: example of Banach space needed, Philips, 03:17
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Tim Peters, 03:14
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Saurav, 03:13
property of eigenvalue in principal components, nazanin, 02:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 02:55
whether Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall are contiguous Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 02:40
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Dave Rosoff, 02:19
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Michael Press, 02:12
Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Proginoskes, 02:09
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Proginoskes, 02:06
Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Mathematician, 02:05
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, G . Frege, 01:59
Re: Article in Scientific American, Michael Press, 01:54
Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Red, 01:52
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Mathematician, 01:51
Re: On finite reflection groups, Jim Heckman, 01:49
Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Red, 01:42
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Reef Fish, 01:40
Re: JSH: Perspective is weird, Red, 01:39
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Gib Bogle, 01:36
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Gib Bogle, 01:34
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 01:33
video, Mathematician, 01:32
Euler Bricks in higher dimensions?, helopticor, 01:24
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, David Marcus, 01:22
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Red, 01:20
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Saurav, 01:14
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Saurav, 01:03
Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:58
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 00:56
JSH: Perspective is weird, jstevh, 00:48
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav, 00:36
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav, 00:33
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Virgil, 00:30
Re: Dedekind's Infinite Sets., Saurav, 00:25
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 00:08
ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?, Saurav, 00:07
Re: Differentiating complex conjugate in respect to the complex, D.Michael, 00:02

December 23, 2006

Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Red, 23:53
Dedekind's Infinite Sets., zuhair, 23:53
Re: Sub Spaces:V1+V3=V2+V3?, Virgil, 23:43
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Tim Peters, 23:40
Re: A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Narasimham, 23:40
Re: Reasoning behind the hostility, Virgil, 23:30
Re: JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, Tim Peters, 23:23
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, junoexpress, 23:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:18
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 23:14
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Tim Peters, 23:11
Re: Computing sets of formulae, lzwnews, 23:10
Re: Reasoning behind the hostility, Larry Hammick, 23:06
Re: Computing sets of formulae, David Wagner, 23:02
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 22:58
JSH: Reasoning behind the hostility, jstevh, 22:53
Re: Computing sets of formulae, William Elliot, 22:52
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, junoexpress, 22:48
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, gjedwards, 22:46
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 22:43
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 22:33
Re: A different version of the Maximal Triangle Problem, William Elliot, 22:23
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:16
Re: [] Rational/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot, 22:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:13
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 22:06
Re: [] multiplier,abstract or not?, William Elliot, 22:02
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 21:57
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, junoexpress, 21:51
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:43
Re: human markov chain behaviour, John Bailey, 21:26
Re: Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Randy Poe, 20:50
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., junoexpress, 20:39
Re: Discovery of new 3-dimensional series and 2 formulas/series for expanding combination expansion, srivastava . sunil, 20:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:25
Calculation of birth/death dates of BC people, Ioannis, 20:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:11
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 19:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 19:47
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 19:44
Re: History of trigonometry, kilian heckrodt, 19:40
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 19:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 18:59
A different version of the Maximal Triangle Problem, precarion, 18:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 18:52
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 18:35
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Nick, 18:35
Re: Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:34
Re: [] Rational/Irrational Numbers, Nick, 18:34
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 18:29
Russian Torsion Fields Space & Psychotronic Weapons R&D, Jack Sarfatti, 18:25
Re: Normalization of k[X] in K(k[X,Y]/(Y^2-X^3)), Lee Rudolph, 18:24
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 18:11
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 17:56
Re: Maximal triangle, matt271829-news, 17:55
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Kira Yamato, 17:53
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:48
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 17:45
Re: Normalization of k[X] in K(k[X,Y]/(Y^2-X^3)), Kira Yamato, 17:43
Re: Article in Scientific American, Lee Rudolph, 17:36
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 17:36
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, christian.bau, 17:25
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, zahc1616, 17:16
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:16
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:16
Re: Article in Scientific American, David Marcus, 17:15
Re: Is the Champernowne constant in some way related to the triangule numbers? (corrected), Gerard Schildberger, 17:01
Is the Champernowne constant in some way related to the triangule numbers?, Gerard Schildberger, 16:59
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 16:58
Re: integral of the function, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 16:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Ralf Bader, 16:53
Re: announcement: Maxima 5.11.0 release, Mark Lawton, 16:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:04
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, kilian heckrodt, 16:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 15:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 15:55
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:49
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 15:44
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Red, 15:04
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 14:39
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, marcus_b, 14:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 14:23
Re: Sub Spaces:V1+V3=V2+V3?, Daniel Mayost, 14:22
Re: Article in Scientific American, Chris Smith, 14:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 14:16
Re: Article in Scientific American, galathaea, 14:15
Cheap e-media solutions for your business., businessjoint, 14:10
Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, Herman Rubin, 14:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:04
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 13:54
Re: Some basic problems on cohomology theories, kanexyz, 13:53
Re: Sub Spaces:V1+V3=V2+V3?, junoexpress, 13:46
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 13:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:37
Re: Article in Scientific American, Christer Ericson, 13:36
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, matt271829-news, 13:35
Re: Sub Spaces:V1+V3=V2+V3?, tomerdr, 13:33
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 13:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:31
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 13:29
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., junoexpress, 13:26
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, dl, 13:24
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 13:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:22
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 13:19
*** ++++++ Bikini Clad Babes +++++ *** RapidScore Downloads...., google98.email5@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:15
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, gwh, 13:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:13
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 13:05
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., sg552, 13:04
Re: is subtraction of subspaces defined?, tomerdr, 12:48
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 12:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 12:41
Re: example of Banach space needed, Valeriu Anisiu, 12:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 12:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 12:30
Re: Some basic problems on cohomology theories, Mike, 12:30
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, danielmryan, 12:23
Re: example of Banach space needed, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:19
Re: Conical Geometry, Narasimham, 12:18
Re: ellipse, José Carlos Santos, 12:07
Re: Signal to noise, Erik Naggum, 12:02
ellipse, qpwoeiruty, 11:55
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 11:50
Re: Differentiating complex conjugate in respect to the complex, Dave L. Renfro, 11:42
Differentiating complex conjugate in respect to the complex, tamiry, 11:33
Re: limit product question, rwalrus, 11:31
Re: example of Banach space needed, Philips, 11:29
Re: is subtraction of subspaces defined?, Tonico, 11:27
Re: limit product question, tamiry, 11:26
is subtraction of subspaces defined?, ilandror, 11:23
Re: limit product question, Tonico, 11:23
Re: limit product question, Dave L. Renfro, 11:22
Re: limit product question, José Carlos Santos, 11:20
Re: simplify radicals - regular 12-gon, Dave L. Renfro, 11:17
limit product question, rwalrus, 11:13
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, kilian heckrodt, 11:11
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Russell, 11:08
Re: Normalization of k[X] in K(k[X,Y]/(Y^2-X^3)), Trav, 11:06
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 11:05
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Gon�alo Rodrigues, 11:01
Computing sets of formulae, lzwnews, 10:57
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:52
Re: example of Banach space needed, David C . Ullrich, 10:47
Re: example of Banach space needed, David C . Ullrich, 10:46
Re: Is the Champernowne constant in some way related to the triangle numbers?, fasttrack2a, 10:44
A Summary of the Generalized Conical Study Thread, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 10:44
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, zahc1616, 10:41
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., David C . Ullrich, 10:41
Re: Signal to noise, louis, 10:35
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 10:32
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Timothy Murphy, 10:24
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, matt271829-news, 10:22
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, marcus_b, 10:17
Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, Axel Vogt, 10:16
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 10:12
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Kira Yamato, 10:08
Re: [] Rational/Irrational Numbers, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:05
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., sg552, 09:59
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., junoexpress, 09:42
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Jannick Asmus, 09:35
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Kira Yamato, 09:21
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., Jesse F. Hughes, 09:19
Re: example of Banach space needed, Valeriu Anisiu, 09:19
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, T.H. Ray, 09:17
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 09:14
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, zahc1616, 09:13
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 09:12
Normalization of k[X] in K(k[X,Y]/(Y^2-X^3)), Kira Yamato, 09:11
History of trigonometry, zeros, 09:05
Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Jannick Asmus, 08:58
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 08:52
Re: Article in Scientific American, John Coleman, 08:42
Re: Maximal triangle, Jim Black, 08:40
Re: example of Banach space needed, Philips, 08:18
Re: Article in Scientific American, John Bailey, 08:16
Re: [] multiplier,abstract or not?, zahc1616, 08:13
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, christian.bau, 08:10
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, danielmryan, 07:56
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, David C . Ullrich, 07:52
Re: example of Banach space needed, David C . Ullrich, 07:44
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., David C . Ullrich, 07:40
Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?, Kira Yamato, 07:31
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, matt271829-news, 07:17
Some basic problems on cohomology theories, kanexyz, 06:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:47
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., T.H. Ray, 06:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:39
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 06:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:25
Re: differentiating the polar coordinate r, G. A. Edgar, 06:01
Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, G. A. Edgar, 05:53
Re: Product of Varieties and Coordinate Functions, Jannick Asmus, 05:49
[] Rational/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot, 05:44
[] Rational/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot, 05:42
Product of Varieties and Coordinate Functions, Kira Yamato, 05:41
Re: Article in Scientific American, Christer Ericson, 05:41
Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, Andrew Taylor, 05:38
Re: differentiating the polar coordinate r, William Elliot, 05:37
Re: How can I order a aggregation of items from multiple lists, William Elliot, 05:29
Re: differentiating the polar coordinate r, fernando revilla, 05:12
Re: Dilworth's Theorem, William Elliot, 04:54
Re: help with a proof, Jannick Asmus, 04:51
Re: ask about transversality, Philips, 04:45
help with a proof, Philips, 04:27
differentiating the polar coordinate r, tamiry, 04:22
Re: Laplace Transforms:, Badger, 04:10
ask about transversality, Philips, 04:07
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, fernando revilla, 03:55
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, Jussi Piitulainen, 03:48
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Tim Peters, 03:45
Re: Laplace Transforms:, Virgil, 03:45
Re: Sub Spaces:V1+V3=V2+V3?, Virgil, 03:41
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Proginoskes, 03:38
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, Proginoskes, 03:36
Re: Dividing 512 bit number by 128 bit number in C programming., David T. Ashley, 03:31
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, kilian heckrodt, 03:19
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Ross A. Finlayson, 03:14
Sub Spaces:V1+V3=V2+V3?, tomerdr, 02:57
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:55
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, G . Frege, 02:51
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:47
Laplace Transforms:, Eric, 02:46
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Mike, 02:44
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Proginoskes, 02:40
Re: Dilworth's Theorem, Butch Malahide, 02:39
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 02:34
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Proginoskes, 02:33
Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Proginoskes, 02:27
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 02:24
Re: Looking for quaternion calculator, Proginoskes, 02:15
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, Proginoskes, 02:12
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, Proginoskes, 02:09
Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, stork, 02:06
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Proginoskes, 01:58
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Proginoskes, 01:55
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Rupert, 01:42
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, G . Frege, 01:32
Re: Dilworth's Theorem, William Elliot, 01:32
[] Rational/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot, 01:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:18
[] multiplier,abstract or not?, William Elliot, 01:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 01:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 01:08
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, G . Frege, 01:04
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, G . Frege, 01:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 00:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:28

December 22, 2006

Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 23:52
Re: Is the Champernowne constant in some way related to the triangle numbers?, fasttrack2a, 23:49
How can I order a aggregation of items from multiple lists, bcot, 23:42
Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 23:40
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, willo_thewisp, 23:31
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 23:29
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, fishfry, 22:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 22:55
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 22:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 22:51
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Timothy Murphy, 22:47
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, kilian heckrodt, 22:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 22:32
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, kilian heckrodt, 22:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 22:27
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Jesse F. Hughes, 22:23
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, zahc1616, 22:21
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, kilian heckrodt, 22:15
On finite reflection groups, Timothy Murphy, 22:14
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 22:12
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:07
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, alok bakshi, 22:07
Re: Tips for venn diagram problem - another GRE exercise, dradcliffe@xxxxxxxxx, 22:07
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot, 22:06
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Rupert, 21:57
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, T.H. Ray, 21:56
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, alok bakshi, 21:53
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, matt271829-news, 21:44
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, Rupert, 21:43
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Herman Rubin, 21:41
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Rupert, 21:40
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, alok bakshi, 21:40
Re: The unimportance of decimal arithmetic ability, Herman Rubin, 21:33
Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot, 21:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:28
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, William Elliot, 21:24
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 21:23
Re: The unimportance of decimal arithmetic ability, Herman Rubin, 21:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:15
Rational/Irrational Numbers, alok bakshi, 21:07
Re: Beta converges to normal, Herman Rubin, 21:05
Re: Maximal triangle, precarion, 21:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 20:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jesse F. Hughes, 20:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:43
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, The Thing, 20:40
Re: Riemann surface theory, galathaea, 20:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 20:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 20:25
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, matt271829-news, 20:14
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, zahc1616, 19:40
Re: Discovery of new 3-dimensional series and 2 formulas/series for expanding combination expansion, sunilsrivastava, 19:32
Re: Discovery of new 3-dimensional series and 2 formulas/series for expanding combination expansion, sunilsrivastava, 19:25
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jake Wildstrom, 19:16
Re: Cosets Representatives, Arturo Magidin, 18:56
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 18:40
Re: multiplier,abstract or not?, matt271829-news, 18:28
Re: human markov chain behaviour, Richard Tobin, 18:08
Re: Dividing 512 bit number by 128 bit number in C programming., Randy Poe, 17:49
Re: Beta converges to normal, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:42
Is the Champernowne constant in some way related to the triangle numbers?, fasttrack2a, 17:38
Is the Champernowne constant in some way related to the triangle numbers?, fasttrack2a, 17:36
Dividing 512 bit number by 128 bit number in C programming., vaidehikedlaya, 17:33
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 16:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 16:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 16:52
Re: String Theory's Organizing Idea in Curvature-Torsion Gauge Theory?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:48
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Virgil, 16:45
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Han . deBruijn, 16:39
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Gib Bogle, 16:28
Re: Breakthroughs in New Physics Dec 12, 2006 Talk On-Line, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:17
String Theory's Organizing Idea in Curvature-Torsion Gauge Theory?, Jack Sarfatti, 16:15
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:12
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, William Hughes, 16:08
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Randy Poe, 16:07
Re: Number of bits in BCD value Re: Matlab problem!!, Randy Poe, 16:04
Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:00
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, dl, 15:58
multiplier,abstract or not?, zahc1616, 15:55
Re: simplify radicals - regular 12-gon, G. A. Edgar, 15:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 15:49
Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, G. A. Edgar, 15:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 15:44
Re: Number of bits in BCD value Re: Matlab problem!!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:27
Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, Axel Vogt, 15:16
Re: Maximal triangle, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:15
Re: Matlab problem!!, gursuavni12, 15:11
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:10
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Rick Decker, 15:03
Number of bits in BCD value Re: Matlab problem!!, Randy Poe, 14:55
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, junoexpress, 14:41
Pronunciation of mathematical symbols, stork, 14:38
Re: Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:35
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, William Hughes, 14:29
Matlab problem!!, kal, 14:27
Why is Einstein a target for crackpots?, Bob Kolker, 14:20
Re: Maximal triangle, precarion, 14:06
Re: Riemann surface theory, galathaea, 14:03
Re: Generalized Inverses and a "simple" problem., carlos, 13:31
Re: simplify radicals - regular 12-gon, Dave L. Renfro, 13:05
Re: Maximal triangle, Robert Israel, 12:43
Re: Looking for quaternion calculator, Ioannis, 12:40
Re: simplify radicals - regular 12-gon, Dave L. Renfro, 12:39
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 12:34
Re: The conical inverse, Narasimham, 12:27
Re: Cosets Representatives, bluelabel, 12:23
Re: INTERVIEWS WITH AUTHOR OF Saint Einstein, Christofer Jon Bjerknes, hanson, 12:19
Re: Cosets Representatives, AlanM, 12:15
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, Richard Henry, 12:11
Re: Polynomial Question, Hotter, 12:03
Maximal triangle, precarion, 12:02
Re: INTERVIEWS WITH AUTHOR OF Saint Einstein, Christofer Jon Bjerknes, Helmut Wabnig, 11:58
Polynomial Question, Clashton, 11:57
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, Randy Poe, 11:56
Re: polynoms / irreducible / primitive / mod 2, Timothy Murphy, 11:45
example of Banach space needed, Philips, 11:41
Looking for quaternion calculator, Daniel al-Autistiqui, 11:36
Re: The conical inverse, Narasimham, 11:33
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, marcus_b, 11:32
Re: The conical inverse, pvk3ster, 11:26
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, Richard Henry, 10:59
Re: Generalized Inverses and a "simple" problem., Maka Karalashvili, 10:40
Re: The unimportance of decimal arithmetic ability, Phil Carmody, 10:32
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Nick, 10:28
Re: separability and dual space, Valeriu Anisiu, 10:22
Re: polynoms / irreducible / primitive / mod 2, Jyrki Lahtonen, 10:17
Re: INTERVIEWS WITH AUTHOR OF Saint Einstein, Christofer Jon Bjerknes, hanson, 10:16
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Rick Decker, 10:13
Re: polynoms / irreducible / primitive / mod 2, Larry Hammick, 10:04
Re: Inverse Cone Geometry, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:47
Re: Cosets Representatives, Arturo Magidin, 09:42
Re: The conical inverse, Narasimham, 09:38
Re: Cosets Representatives, bluelabel, 09:36
Re: The conical inverse, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:25
Re: Cosets Representatives, hagman, 09:22
Re: Inverse Cone Geometry, matt271829-news, 09:21
Re: Arithmetic on the product of the complex field, hagman, 09:19
Re: Article in Scientific American, John Coleman, 09:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 09:15
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, marcus_b, 09:08
Re: Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., David C . Ullrich, 09:04
Cosets Representatives, bluelabel, 08:59
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, The Last Danish Pastry, 08:36
Re: helping with German, Tonico, 08:36
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, William Hughes, 08:35
Re: Inverse Cone Geometry, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:35
Re: Article in Scientific American, luiroto, 08:26
Re: JSH: Weird if correct. You are a parasite., The Last Danish Pastry, 08:25
Re: polynoms / irreducible / primitive / mod 2, Derek Holt, 07:58
Re: The conical inverse, matt271829-news, 07:49
Re: Tips for venn diagram problem - another GRE exercise, Randy Poe, 07:37
Re: Inverse Cone Geometry, matt271829-news, 07:32
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Larry Lard, 07:27
Arithmetic on the product of the complex field, Jose Capco, 07:13
Tips for venn diagram problem - another GRE exercise, john, 06:55
Re: Inverse Cone Geometry, Narasimham, 06:20
Re: Dilworth's Theorem, Butch Malahide, 05:38
helping with German, Anvita, 05:27
Re: INTERVIEWS WITH AUTHOR OF Saint Einstein, Christofer Jon Bjerknes, Helmut Wabnig, 05:00
Re: polynoms / irreducible / primitive / mod 2, Hans, 04:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 04:25
Re: Combinatorics problem, Michael Press, 04:05
Re: Why do we call it "coordinate ring"?, hagman, 03:55
about transversality, Philips, 03:54
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, pApAk, 03:41
Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Proginoskes, 03:24
Re: Dilworth's Theorem, William Elliot, 03:23
Re: Combinatorics problem, Butch Malahide, 03:18
Re: proving peano's postulate, Proginoskes, 03:09
Re: polynoms / irreducible / primitive / mod 2, Larry Hammick, 03:08
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Proginoskes, 02:58
polynoms / irreducible / primitive / mod 2, Hans, 02:24
Re: JSH: Weird if correct. You are a parasite., Red, 02:21
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Tim Peters, 02:06
Re: human markov chain behaviour, Richard Heathfield, 01:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:47
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 01:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Gc, 01:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Gc, 01:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:54
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Michael Press, 00:53
Re: building an addition table from a list of numbers, Robert Israel, 00:51
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Michael Press, 00:48
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Tim Peters, 00:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Gc, 00:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 00:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 00:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:28
Riemann surface theory, Rupert, 00:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:19
Why do we call it "coordinate ring"?, Gvnaena Pura, 00:11
Proof that Randomness is trivial. Zero explained in complete detail., huangxienchen, 00:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 00:04

December 21, 2006

Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 23:39
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 23:37
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 23:17
Re: integral of the function, Badger, 22:54
Equations from a triangle, Deep, 22:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:48
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, marcus_b, 22:45
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Rupert, 22:44
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Rupert, 22:42
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, mike3, 22:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 22:15
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 22:05
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, Jesse F. Hughes, 21:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 21:48
Re: Optimization Without Calculus, md, 21:46
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, Richard Henry, 21:45
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, hale, 21:45
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, Gib Bogle, 21:36
Re: Optimization Without Calculus, md, 21:33
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Rupert, 21:17
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Rupert, 21:13
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, jstevh, 21:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:01
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, marcus_b, 20:52
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, jstevh, 20:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:34
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 20:28
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, jstevh, 20:23
Re: building an addition table from a list of numbers, paulklemstine, 20:22
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, Jesse F. Hughes, 20:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 20:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 20:02
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Bill Hale, 20:01
Re: INTERVIEWS WITH AUTHOR OF Saint Einstein, Christofer Jon Bjerknes, hanson, 19:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:47
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Martin Winer, 19:45
Re: Variance of SBM Powers, Daniel Mayost, 19:31
announcement: Maxima 5.11.0 release, Robert Dodier, 19:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 19:26
Re: formula finding software, matt271829-news, 19:15
Re: formula finding software, Michael, 19:08
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 19:06
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 18:52
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 18:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 18:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:38
Re: human markov chain behaviour, Jürgen Böhm, 18:34
formula finding software, mike7411, 18:31
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, litsohate, 18:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:02
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:57
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, marcus_b, 17:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:49
Re: simplify radicals - regular 12-gon, JEMebius, 17:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:28
separability and dual space, Fedor, 17:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:22
Re: regularity of the distance function, differential equation, Fedor, 17:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:43
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Keith Ramsay, 16:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:38
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, David M Einstein, 16:20
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Michael Press, 16:13
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, DmitryKovtun, 16:05
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Tim Peters, 16:02
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 15:53
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, David Marcus, 15:49
Re: Inverse Cone Geometry, matt271829-news, 15:34
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, Gib Bogle, 15:25
Re: high school trigonometry?, Michael Press, 15:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:05
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, marcus_b, 14:46
Re: Duals of spaces of operators, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:42
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, David T. Ashley, 14:40
Re: Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:31
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Nick, 14:29
Re: Conical Geometry, Narasimham, 14:27
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Virgil, 14:27
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Martin Winer, 14:26
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Nick, 14:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:19
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Helmut Wabnig, 14:10
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Tim Peters, 14:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:07
explaining why the neutron meanlife and the MEV of leptons are what they are Re: let us throw into the mix the Tau particle Re: Muons work because they enlarge the nucleus; different stickiness for triton, deutron, hydrogen Re: better picture for muon than 207 times dragging, a_plutonium, 13:57
Re: The unimportance of decimal arithmetic ability, Nick, 13:57
Re: The unimportance of decimal arithmetic ability, Nick, 13:50
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, Gib Bogle, 13:48
Symmetry methods applied to linerisable PDEs, peter c, 13:45
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Nick, 13:43
Scheduling processor bound systems, shtasik, 13:42
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., MoeBlee, 13:24
Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Michael Moroney, 13:11
Re: Dilworth's Theorem, Butch Malahide, 13:07
Re: The unimportance of decimal arithmetic ability, Giovanni Resta, 13:03
Re: The proof of the Riemann hypothesis, Gauster, 13:01
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, MoeBlee, 12:50
Re: The unimportance of decimal arithmetic ability, Gon�alo Rodrigues, 12:49
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 12:36
Re: second partial derivatives commute (Clairaut's Thm.), Dave L. Renfro, 12:29
Re: Beta converges to normal, Robert Israel, 12:27
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, David T. Ashley, 12:25
Re: The proof of the Riemann hypothesis, Hisanobu Shinya, 12:24
The unimportance of decimal arithmetic ability, Herman Rubin, 12:23
Re: simplify radicals, Pubkeybreaker, 11:52
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Herman Rubin, 11:50
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, Rupert, 11:41
Re: Linear Programming Problem..., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:40
Re: Duals of spaces of operators, A N Niel, 11:37
Re: Beta converges to normal, Herman Rubin, 11:33
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, Karenia Brevis, 11:30
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Pubkeybreaker, 11:25
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Nick, 11:24
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, hagman, 11:20
Re: Article in Scientific American, Herman Rubin, 11:15
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Nam Nguyen, 11:14
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 11:02
Re: Conical Geometry, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:57
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Randy Poe, 10:54
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Dave L. Renfro, 10:42
Conical Geometry, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:40
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, pauldepstein, 10:35
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Randy Poe, 10:31
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Nick, 10:30
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Arturo Magidin, 10:18
Re: Linear Programming Problem..., FiftySix, 10:12
Re: The proof of the Riemann hypothesis, Hisanobu Shinya, 10:06
transversality, Philips, 10:05
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, DmitryKovtun, 10:04
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), luiroto, 09:51
sure punk, chris, 09:27
Re: Variance of SBM Powers, Peter, 09:23
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Nick, 09:18
Duals of spaces of operators, Gon�alo Rodrigues, 09:11
Re: simplify radicals, a1jrj@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:09
Re: I WANNA SUCK SOME COCKS:)), David Ames, 09:08
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, pauldepstein, 08:42
Re: "Square root" spiral, kunzmilan, 08:40
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, pauldepstein, 08:29
Re: proving peano's postulate, David C . Ullrich, 08:24
Re: what does an equals symbol with a delta above it mean?, Gareth Jones, 08:13
Re: what does an equals symbol with a delta above it mean?, Cary, 07:52
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Randy Poe, 07:52
Re: what does an equals symbol with a delta above it mean?, Bob Kolker, 07:44
Re: what does an equals symbol with a delta above it mean?, Randy Poe, 07:42
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Richard Tobin, 07:34
Re: Beta converges to normal, Andrew Usher, 07:16
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, Chip Eastham, 07:14
what does an equals symbol with a delta above it mean?, agentsmoth, 07:11
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, johnjo, 07:10
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, David C . Ullrich, 07:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Albrecht, 06:59
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Albrecht, 06:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 06:45
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Alois Steindl, 06:23
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, Andrew Usher, 06:20
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, john, 06:16
Logarithmic Spirals, Andrew Usher, 06:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 06:09
Re: Dilworth's Theorem, William Elliot, 06:03
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, john, 06:03
Re: "Square root" spiral, Giovanni Resta, 05:54
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 05:45
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, johnjo, 05:40
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, Tim Peters, 05:36
Re: "Square root" spiral, David W . Cantrell, 05:32
Re: simplify radicals, Stan Brown, 05:24
Re: another GRE math exercise problem, hagman, 05:24
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, pApAk, 05:24
another GRE math exercise problem, john, 05:15
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Helmut Wabnig, 05:11
Re: Inverse Cone Geometry, Narasimham, 04:49
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, aatu . koskensilta, 04:43
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, pApAk, 04:31
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, pApAk, 04:23
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 04:21
Re: Skolem-Lowenheim th: prove please, aatu . koskensilta, 04:16
"Square root" spiral, joshipura, 04:16
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Han de Bruijn, 04:15
Re: I WANNA SUCK SOME COCKS:)), Han de Bruijn, 04:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 04:06
let us throw into the mix the Tau particle Re: Muons work because they enlarge the nucleus; different stickiness for triton, deutron, hydrogen Re: better picture for muon than 207 times dragging, a_plutonium, 03:53
Re: proving peano's postulate, hagman, 03:47
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, kunzmilan, 03:43
Beta converges to normal, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 03:36
Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 03:34
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., hagman, 03:29
Re: Article in Scientific American, Han de Bruijn, 03:23
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 03:16
Re: Proper Classes outside of NBG, aatu . koskensilta, 03:16
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Ross A. Finlayson, 03:13
Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Proginoskes, 03:01
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Tim Peters, 02:50
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Michael Press, 02:47
Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 02:44
Re: Variance of SBM Powers, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 02:33
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, hagman, 02:24
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Tim Peters, 02:01
Re: Combinatorics problem, Proginoskes, 01:58
Re: Looking for a protractor, Proginoskes, 01:55
Re: I WANNA SUCK SOME COCKS:)), Proginoskes, 01:53
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Proginoskes, 01:51
Re: This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Proginoskes, 01:48
Re: proving peano's postulate, Proginoskes, 01:43
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Proginoskes, 01:37
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Proginoskes, 01:34
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, Proginoskes, 01:26
Re: Article in Scientific American, Christer Ericson, 01:17
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 01:10
NCGC 2007, vravi68@xxxxxxxxx, 01:06
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 01:02
Re: Proper Classes outside of NBG, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:53
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 00:33
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, john, 00:31
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, mike3, 00:25
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, Chip Eastham, 00:03

December 20, 2006

Re: JSH: Weird if correct, mike3, 23:30
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, mike3, 23:29
Re: Article in Scientific American, Robert Israel, 23:27
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 23:24
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, mike3, 23:24
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 23:23
Re: Smooth manifolds, topology and basis, Larry Hammick, 23:10
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Keith Ramsay, 23:05
Re: high school trigonometry?, Robert A Moeser, 23:02
Re: high school trigonometry?, Robert A Moeser, 23:02
Re: building an addition table from a list of numbers, Robert Israel, 22:47
Re: Variance of SBM Powers, Daniel Mayost, 22:35
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 22:26
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Tim Peters, 22:10
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 22:10
Re: Inverse Cone Geometry, Narasimham, 22:10
Beam Weapons, Ken Shoulders, Hal Puthoff, Charge Clusters & Dark Matter Galactic Halo, Jack Sarfatti, 21:55
Re: The conical inverse, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 21:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 21:43
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 21:41
Re: besides infinite dimensional theory, Zbigniew Karno, 21:35
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 21:34
Re: Article in Scientific American, Herman Rubin, 21:33
Re: improved sieve of erastothenes, luiroto, 21:33
Re: Article in Scientific American, Larry Hammick, 21:32
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Rupert, 21:11
Re: Signal to noise, DmitryKovtun, 21:10
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, junoexpress, 21:09
Re: Combinatorics problem, Bob Kolker, 20:39
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, jstevh, 20:36
Combinatorics problem, ptell8, 20:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 20:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:36
Re: integral of the function, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:27
Re: Looking for a protractor, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:26
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:23
Re: Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:22
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jake Wildstrom, 19:21
Re: arclength, Virgil, 19:15
Re: integral of the function, Daniel Mayost, 19:11
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Michael Press, 19:08
Re: Induction, bluelabel, 19:06
Re: JSH: Latest paper submitted, litsohate, 18:45
Re: building an addition table from a list of numbers, paulklemstine, 18:34
Re: Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:29
Re: Article in Scientific American, Hero, 18:19
integral of the function, Norman, 18:18
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, christian.bau, 18:15
Re: Looking for a protractor, Gib Bogle, 18:10
Re: Variance of SBM Powers, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 17:59
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, matt271829-news, 17:51
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., MoeBlee, 17:42
Re: Inverse Cone Geometry, Hero, 17:40
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 17:39
Re: building an addition table from a list of numbers, David T. Ashley, 17:37
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, litsohate, 17:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 17:29
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 17:25
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, hagman, 17:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 17:13
building an addition table from a list of numbers, paulklemstine, 17:11
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, fernando revilla, 17:04
Re: I WANNA SUCK SOME COCKS:)), Pyenos, 17:03
Re: testing, Pyenos, 16:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:47
Re: simplify radicals, N. Silver, 16:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 16:46
Re: testing, Pyenos, 16:44
Re: Dilworth's Theorem, Butch Malahide, 16:44
besides infinite dimensional theory, Philips, 16:38
Re: The conical inverse, matt271829-news, 16:37
Re: Variance of SBM Powers, Daniel Mayost, 16:34
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 16:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:24
Re: References for Continuity Sets, Dave L. Renfro, 16:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:09
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 16:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:01
Re: testing, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:55
Re: Laderman's algorithm for 3x3 matrix multiplication, Chris, 15:53
Re: Inverse Cone Geometry, matt271829-news, 15:50
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 15:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:48
Re: Variance of SBM Powers, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:44
Re: I WANNA SUCK SOME COCKS:)), Jesse F. Hughes, 15:35
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 15:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:31
Re: Gennady Shipov's torsion field theory, ivars . fabriciuss, 15:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:23
Re: Inverse Cone Geometry, Narasimham, 15:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:04
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:59
Re: Beautiful and ingenious, Gib Bogle, 14:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:55
Re: Article in Scientific American, Gib Bogle, 14:52
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 14:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:47
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Nick, 14:33
testing, Pyenos, 14:24
Re: simplify radicals, Badger, 14:19
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, Nick, 14:18
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, fernando revilla, 14:14
Re: Induction, Michael, 13:58
Re: Moments/Moments of Inertia, Randy Poe, 13:56
Re: Article in Scientific American, Bob Kolker, 13:56
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Herman Rubin, 13:54
Re: Article in Scientific American, Christer Ericson, 13:47
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Nick, 13:45
Re: A kind of derangements, Rob Pratt, 13:40
Re: Moments/Moments of Inertia, Nick, 13:38
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Nam Nguyen, 13:29
Re: simplify radicals, Dave L. Renfro, 13:28
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Nick, 13:20
Re: Article in Scientific American, Herman Rubin, 13:20
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Nick, 13:14
This Logical Check or Test Re: lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 13:13
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Nam Nguyen, 13:08
Re: Rational Numbers and Napier's Constant, Robert Israel, 13:08
Gennady Shipov's torsion field theory, Jack Sarfatti, 12:49
Re: Spheres Inside A Cube, gwh, 12:45
Re: simplify radicals, sttscitrans, 12:41
Re: simplify radicals, sttscitrans, 12:41
Re: simplify radicals, Pubkeybreaker, 12:40
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, junoexpress, 12:37
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 12:36
Re: arclength, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 12:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 12:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 12:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 12:31
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 12:29
Re: simplify radicals, Badger, 12:27
Re: I WANNA SUCK SOME COCKS:)), fishfry, 12:16
Re: simplify radicals, Dave L. Renfro, 12:06
Re: simplify radicals, G. A. Edgar, 11:59
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, anarchistic_progressivist, 11:56
Re: Rational Numbers and Napier's Constant, G. A. Edgar, 11:56
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 11:53
Re: Rational Numbers and Napier's Constant, Dave L. Renfro, 11:46
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 11:36
Re: simplify radicals, lite . on . beta, 11:36
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 11:32
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 11:28
Re: simplify radicals, Pubkeybreaker, 11:20
simplify radicals, lite . on . beta, 11:10
Re: The conical inverse, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 11:07
Re: The Generalized Cone, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:59
I WANNA SUCK SOME COCKS:)), sexy_lady86, 10:58
Re: Rational Numbers and Napier's Constant, Maury Barbato, 10:41
Re: Variance of SBM Powers, Peter, 10:18
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., hagman, 10:16
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Dave L. Renfro, 10:11
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, DmitryKovtun, 10:11
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, David T. Ashley, 10:08
Re: Skolem-Lowenheim th: prove please, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:08
Re: Bayesian game, glenn, 10:03
Re: The conical inverse, matt271829-news, 10:02
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Dave L. Renfro, 10:02
Variance of SBM Powers, Peter, 09:49
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, Arturo Magidin, 09:49
Re: Looking for a protractor, bert, 09:45
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, DmitryKovtun, 09:43
Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, DmitryKovtun, 09:42
Re: Skolem-Lowenheim th: prove please, Bob Kolker, 09:38
Bayesian game, glenn077, 09:35
Re: field generated by Cantor-like set of reals, David C . Ullrich, 09:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 09:21
Re: proving peano's postulate, David C . Ullrich, 09:12
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Denis Feldmann, 09:11
fuzzy measures, Qwerty, 09:10
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Nick, 09:07
Skolem-Lowenheim th: prove please, Saurav, 08:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:55
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, hagman, 08:53
Re: locally invertible map, Jannick Asmus, 08:48
Re: Looking for a protractor, Narasimham, 08:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:44
Re: Looking for a protractor, Narasimham, 08:39
Re: field generated by Cantor-like set of reals, Hagen, 08:37
Looking for a protractor, gururajan20815, 08:20
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Nick, 08:16
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, Han de Bruijn, 08:12
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, David C . Ullrich, 08:10
Beautiful and ingenious, Han de Bruijn, 08:08
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, David C . Ullrich, 08:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:46
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Nick, 07:46
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Randy Poe, 07:42
Re: locally invertible map, Philips, 07:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Albrecht, 07:39
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:14
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:12
Re: locally invertible map, Jannick Asmus, 07:12
Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, Larry Lard, 07:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:04
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Larry Lard, 07:04
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Larry Lard, 06:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:54
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Jesse F. Hughes, 06:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:45
Re: Dilworth's Theorem, William Elliot, 06:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:36
Re: Article in Scientific American, Bob Kolker, 06:34
Re: Article in Scientific American, Bob Kolker, 06:32
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Giovanni Resta, 06:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:30
Re: field, Dik T. Winter, 06:29
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 06:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:13
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Taria, 06:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:10
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Michael J�rgensen, 05:59
Re: decimal arithmetics--gre, Randy Poe, 05:52
Re: field, Luigi Cerulo, 05:46
Re: locally invertible map, Philips, 05:38
Re: locally invertible map, Jannick Asmus, 05:35
Re: Induction, hagman, 05:34
decimal arithmetics--gre, john, 05:34
Re: arclength, will, 05:32
field generated by Cantor-like set of reals, David Bernier, 05:27
Re: field, hagman, 05:26
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 05:16
Re: locally invertible map, Philips, 05:15
Re: arclength, Alois Steindl, 05:00
Re: locally invertible map, Jannick Asmus, 04:58
Re: arclength, will, 04:52
Re: field, Luigi Cerulo, 04:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 04:36
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 04:35
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Han de Bruijn, 04:32
Re: Article in Scientific American, kilian heckrodt, 04:28
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Han de Bruijn, 04:26
Re: field, kilian heckrodt, 04:21
Re: arclength, José Carlos Santos, 04:11
Re: arclength, Alois Steindl, 04:09
Re: field, José Carlos Santos, 04:06
locally invertible map, Philips, 04:05
Re: Proper Classes outside of NBG, aatu . koskensilta, 04:04
field, Luigi Cerulo, 04:00
arclength, will, 04:00
Re: Article in Scientific American, Han de Bruijn, 03:56
Re: Article in Scientific American, Phil Carmody, 03:55
Re: JSH: Go For It!, JM, 03:46
Re: improved sieve of erastothenes, Phil Carmody, 03:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, Albrecht, 03:39
Re: improved sieve of erastothenes, Phil Carmody, 03:38
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 03:33
Fractal time series, Hausdorff dimension, and power spectrum relationship?, conover, 03:32
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 03:20
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Albrecht, 03:20
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 03:02
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Nam Nguyen, 02:59
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Tim Peters, 02:38
lack of applying logic in physics theory Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 02:26
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Virgil, 02:12
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Virgil, 02:09
Muons work because they enlarge the nucleus; different stickiness for triton, deutron, hydrogen Re: better picture for muon than 207 times dragging, a_plutonium, 01:59
Re: (x+1)^(1/2), linux, 01:51
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 01:26
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Sorcerer, 01:21
Lecture Notes and Videos of Cool Mathematics Courses from various Universities, Syam, 01:10
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 01:02
? soln of DE with like geometry, Cheng Cosine, 00:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 00:39
Re: Induction, Rupert, 00:27
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 00:22
Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, Gib Bogle, 00:19
Re: The proof of the Riemann hypothesis, Gauster, 00:15
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 00:05

December 19, 2006

Re: Cantor Confusion, G . Frege, 23:59
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 23:55
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:50
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Virgil, 23:48
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Virgil, 23:45
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 23:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:39
Induction, bluelabel, 23:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 23:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 22:46
Re: Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:42
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, David T. Ashley, 22:33
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 22:30
Re: Dilworth's Theorem, Butch Malahide, 22:26
Re: Article in Scientific American, T.H. Ray, 22:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 22:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:29
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, hanson, 21:24
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, hanson, 21:24
Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, DmitryKovtun, 21:08
Smooth manifolds, topology and basis, Luigi Malagò, 20:43
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 20:42
Re: Article in Scientific American, Herman Rubin, 20:38
>-) ~-`-`- Amazing 5.5" Turd Cutter -' -'-~ (-<, google98.email@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:37
Re: Proper Classes outside of NBG, Alessandro Duarte, 20:35
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 20:30
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 20:26
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, David Moran, 20:21
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, marcus_b, 20:18
Re: Inverse 1/x function complex analytic, David W . Cantrell, 20:13
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Jesse F. Hughes, 20:10
Re: Article in Scientific American, Proginoskes, 19:59
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Michael Press, 19:54
Re: Article in Scientific American, Larry Hammick, 19:54
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, DmitryKovtun, 19:28
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:27
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Proginoskes, 19:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 19:25
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Proginoskes, 19:17
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., T.H. Ray, 19:16
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Proginoskes, 19:15
Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, Proginoskes, 19:10
Re: Computing a Stochastic Integral, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:06
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Proginoskes, 19:05
Re: Dilworth's Theorem, Butch Malahide, 18:52
Re: Proper Classes outside of NBG, smn, 18:45
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, gjedwards, 18:42
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, marcus_b, 18:39
Re: Proper Classes outside of NBG, Rupert, 18:32
Re: Article in Scientific American, Butch Malahide, 18:30
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, gjedwards, 18:29
Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, Rupert, 18:28
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 18:26
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, marcus_b, 18:24
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, DmitryKovtun, 18:24
Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, Rupert, 18:23
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Tim Peters, 18:09
Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, jstevh, 18:03
Re: Object Ring Challenges, hagman, 18:00
Re: Computing a Stochastic Integral, Jannick Asmus, 17:55
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, jstevh, 17:53
Re: Rational Numbers and Napier's Constant, Dave L. Renfro, 17:53
Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, Rupert, 17:51
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, David Marcus, 17:49
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, Rupert, 17:43
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, Tim Peters, 17:42
Re: Rational Numbers and Napier's Constant, dcorbit, 17:35
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, gjedwards, 17:35
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 17:32
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 17:30
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, gjedwards, 17:29
Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, jstevh, 17:29
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Rupert, 17:26
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, Tim Peters, 17:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:22
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 17:21
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 17:14
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, Rupert, 17:14
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, Jason Pawloski, 17:14
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, Rupert, 17:12
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, Rupert, 17:09
Article in Scientific American, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:04
Re: Moments/Moments of Inertia, David T. Ashley, 17:03
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, marcus_b, 16:52
Re: Proper Classes in Set Theory, Herman Rubin, 16:48
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Sorcerer, 16:46
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, Randy Poe, 16:32
Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, The Last Danish Pastry, 16:31
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Helmut Wabnig, 16:29
Re: Discrete Math Video, km8080nospam, 16:28
Re: JSH: Go For It!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:27
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 16:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:13
Graphs of functions and their derivatives, Charles Wells, 16:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:12
Re: Proper Classes in Set Theory, Richard Harter, 16:08
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, DmitryKovtun, 16:08
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, Gib Bogle, 16:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:06
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Sorcerer, 16:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:00
Re: Go For It!, DmitryKovtun, 15:57
Re: proving peano's postulate, MoeBlee, 15:57
Re: proving peano's postulate, MoeBlee, 15:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:53
Re: mgf to pmf or distn fn, Herman Rubin, 15:49
Re: Automorphisms and political behavior, Karl-Olav Nyberg, 15:49
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, hanson, 15:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:45
Re: Rational Numbers and Napier's Constant, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:39
Re: Rational Numbers and Napier's Constant, dcorbit, 15:31
Re: Laderman's algorithm for 3x3 matrix multiplication, benjamin . a . bartsch, 15:31
Re: Dilworth's Theorem, Butch Malahide, 15:30
Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, carlip-nospam, 15:30
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 15:24
Proper Classes outside of NBG, Math1723, 15:18
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Helmut Wabnig, 15:15
Re: JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, William Hughes, 15:10
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Herman Rubin, 15:09
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Helmut Wabnig, 15:07
N!=4^n(8k+7) are SOS(3); N=4^n(8k+7) are SOS(4) with two equal squares!, Gerry, 15:05
Re: about infinite dimensional theory, Philips, 15:04
Re: infinite dimensional theory, Philips, 15:00
Re: regularity of the distance function, differential equation, Robert Israel, 14:59
Proper Classes in Set Theory, Math1723, 14:56
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Randy Poe, 14:51
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Herman Rubin, 14:45
Re: JSH: Go For It!, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:42
Re: JSH: Go For It!, Jason Pawloski, 14:40
Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Herman Rubin, 14:25
JSH: Automorphisms and political behavior, jstevh, 14:24
Re: Rational Numbers and Napier's Constant, Dave L. Renfro, 14:22
Re: Rational Numbers and Napier's Constant, Dave L. Renfro, 14:14
Re: proving peano's postulate, MoeBlee, 14:01
Re: JSH: Weird if correct, Gib Bogle, 13:56
Re: ? soln of DE with like geometry, Robert Israel, 13:55
JSH: Weird if correct, jstevh, 13:49
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 13:48
Computing a Stochastic Integral, Peter, 13:42
Re: JSH: Go For It!, Larry Lard, 13:33
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, Randy Poe, 13:33
Re: (x+1)^(1/2), linux, 13:19
Rational Numbers and Napier's Constant, Maury Barbato, 13:12
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 13:06
Re: Spheres Inside A Cube, Narasimham, 13:05
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 12:55
Re: 4 minutes 640x480 Mandelbrot zoom video., Janek Kozicki, 12:50
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, briggs, 12:42
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Christopher J. Henrich, 12:41
Re: multinomial covariances, Robert Israel, 12:38
Re: The Generalized Cone, Spoonfed, 12:28
Re: proving peano's postulate, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:26
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, David T. Ashley, 12:23
Re: 4 minutes 640x480 Mandelbrot zoom video., G. A. Edgar, 12:16
Re: multinomial covariances, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:14
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 12:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 11:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:53
Re: JSH: Clarified disproof, Grad Student, 11:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 11:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 11:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:22
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, hanson, 11:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:20
Re: Moments/Moments of Inertia, Nick, 11:16
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 11:15
Re: proving peano's postulate, David C . Ullrich, 11:10
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, CBTuee@xxxxxxxxx, 11:04
Re: Ordinals, Dave L. Renfro, 11:04
Re: proving peano's postulate, David C . Ullrich, 11:02
Re: Question about logic, Nick, 10:49
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Martin Winer, 10:46
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 10:32
regularity of the distance function, differential equation, Fedor, 10:30
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Martin Winer, 10:20
The Generalized Cone, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:07
Re: JSH: Object Ring Challenges, Arturo Magidin, 10:02
Re: sum of uniformly distributed discrete random variables, se16, 09:52
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Larry Hammick, 09:43
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, Arturo Magidin, 09:42
Re: 4 minutes 640x480 Mandelbrot zoom video., Ben Rudiak-Gould, 09:11
Re: Go For It!, The Last Danish Pastry, 09:06
Re: proving peano's postulate, Spitfire, 08:57
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 08:49
Re: weak Kaplansky theorem, Jannick Asmus, 08:35
Re: JSH: Go For It!, Jesse F. Hughes, 08:23
? soln of DE with like geometry, Cheng Cosine, 08:21
Re: multinomial covariances, Michael J�rgensen, 08:21
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Jesse F. Hughes, 08:15
Re: Why is arithmetic mean being used in calculating standard deviation!? Why not some thing else!?, m7ossny, 08:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 07:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:53
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, bassam king karzeddin, 07:52
Re: proving peano's postulate, David C . Ullrich, 07:48
Re: Complex Analisys Problem, David C . Ullrich, 07:44
Re: Complex Analisys Problem, A N Niel, 07:37
Re: JSH: Clarified disproof, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:06
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:00
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Aatu Koskensilta, 06:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:49
Re: proving peano's postulate, Spitfire, 06:47
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Sorcerer, 06:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:42
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, James Dolan, 06:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:33
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, pApAk, 06:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:26
Re: proving peano's postulate, hagman, 06:25
Re: JSH: Go For It!, JM, 06:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 06:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:10
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Larry Hammick, 05:54
proving peano's postulate, Spitfire, 05:52
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Lee Rudolph, 05:39
multinomial covariances, Earl, 05:36
Re: JSH: Go For It!, DmitryKovtun, 05:34
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 05:31
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Sorcerer, 05:30
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Helmut Wabnig, 05:27
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, DmitryKovtun, 05:23
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, pApAk, 05:04
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Rupert, 04:59
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, Rupert, 04:53
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 04:43
Re: Moments/Moments of Inertia, Anders, 04:40
solutions to dummit foote, stefan . petrea, 04:26
Dilworth's Theorem, William Elliot, 04:25
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 04:21
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Keith Ramsay, 04:18
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Giovanni Resta, 04:04
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Albrecht, 03:49
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Tim Peters, 03:49
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Virgil, 03:48
Re: JSH: Go For It!, Proginoskes, 03:35
JSH: Go For It!, JM, 03:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 03:10
Moments/Moments of Inertia, Eric, 02:58
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 02:54
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 02:54
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 02:47
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Proginoskes, 02:43
better picture for muon than 207 times dragging Re: why do muons work in catalyzing fusion? Is the force of gravity not involved? Re: muons should provide the answer as to whether the nucleus has gravity, a_plutonium, 02:37
Re: Laderman's algorithm for 3x3 matrix multiplication, Christer Ericson, 02:35
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, Proginoskes, 02:35
Re: Sofia Kovalevsky, Proginoskes, 02:31
Re: chromatic number of the plane: open problem, Proginoskes, 02:27
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 02:25
Re: high school trigonometry?, Michael Press, 02:22
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 02:20
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Rupert, 02:16
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 02:15
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 02:10
Re: Transposing and transversing, Islam is Shit, 02:09
Re: bijections on REALS, Butch Malahide, 01:55
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 01:49
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, guenther vonKnakspot, 01:41
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 01:16
Re: Question about Programming a Turing Machine, Chris Smith, 01:13
Re: JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, Gib Bogle, 00:45
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 00:40
Re: ?? which reals ??, galathaea, 00:33
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 00:20
Re: Sofia Kovalevsky, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 00:12
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:12
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 00:05

December 18, 2006

Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, Gib Bogle, 23:42
Complex Analisys Problem, Juan Barrios, 23:30
Re: Cowards - where did everyone "run off" to ? Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Randy Poe, 23:27
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 23:27
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, fishfry, 23:22
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, fishfry, 23:19
JSH: An attempt to reconstruct James' argument, Rupert, 23:18
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Arturo Magidin, 23:17
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 23:09
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Dik T. Winter, 23:09
Re: Cowards - where did everyone "run off" to ? Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 23:05
mgf to pmf or distn fn, Earl, 23:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:55
Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, marcus_b, 22:52
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, David T. Ashley, 22:36
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 22:23
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., zuhair, 22:20
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 22:16
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 22:15
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Arturo Magidin, 22:10
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 22:09
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Tim Peters, 22:07
"well ordering" & "total ordering", William Elliot, 21:58
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Rupert, 21:56
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 21:54
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Rupert, 21:48
"well ordering" & "total ordering", William Elliot, 21:48
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Brian, 21:47
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 21:45
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 21:45
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 21:39
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Bill Hale, 21:33
Re: Ordinals, William Elliot, 21:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 21:32
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 21:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 21:27
Re: FLTAA: Field structure p = 2, p>2, The Dougster, 21:15
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 21:08
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, David Bernier, 21:06
Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, Jesse F. Hughes, 21:04
Re: chromatic number of the plane: open problem, Butch Malahide, 21:03
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, DmitryKovtun, 21:01
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:58
Re: JSH: Object Ring Challenges, Jesse F. Hughes, 20:56
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, junoexpress, 20:44
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Proginoskes, 20:43
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Proginoskes, 20:38
Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, Tim Peters, 20:37
Re: I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:33
Re: Another algebra problem related with cyclotomy polynomial., Gary Cooper, 20:31
Re: So why did they bother?, Proginoskes, 20:31
Re: Ordinals, Butch Malahide, 20:30
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:29
Re: So why did they bother?, Grad Student, 20:29
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 20:27
Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Peter Webb, 20:26
Re: bijections on REALS, Butch Malahide, 20:19
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 20:19
I think math creates psychopaths and serial killers, Ed Zagmoon, 20:11
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 20:02
Re: bijections on REALS, Rupert, 20:01
Re: So why did they bother?, Karenia Brevis, 20:00
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 20:00
Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, Tim Peters, 20:00
Re: So why did they bother?, David Moran, 19:59
Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, Tim Peters, 19:56
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Rupert, 19:56
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Dik T. Winter, 19:52
Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, DmitryKovtun, 19:51
Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, Rupert, 19:43
Re: Jech's Set Theory, MoeBlee, 19:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, David R Tribble, 19:32
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 19:30
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 19:21
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Dik T. Winter, 19:18
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Dik T. Winter, 19:11
Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, sg552, 19:09
Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, jstevh, 19:08
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 19:04
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Dik T. Winter, 19:03
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, gjedwards, 19:00
Re: JSH: So why did they bother?, Rupert, 19:00
JSH: So why did they bother?, jstevh, 18:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 18:30
Re: Ordinals, Dave L. Renfro, 18:15
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, DmitryKovtun, 18:15
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Gc, 18:12
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jesse F. Hughes, 18:10
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 18:09
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 18:04
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Arturo Magidin, 18:02
Re: ?? which reals ??, Virgil, 18:02
Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Arturo Magidin, 18:00
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, fishfry, 17:49
How many continuous functions? (History), Dave L. Renfro, 17:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:39
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Jake Wildstrom, 17:25
taylor series for function space, novis, 17:21
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., T.H. Ray, 17:16
Re: Question about logic, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:06
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, marcus_b, 17:06
Re: Question about logic, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:05
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, mathtalk, 17:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, Gc, 16:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:49
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, hagman, 16:48
Re: Object Ring Challenges, hagman, 16:43
Re: Inverse 1/x function complex analytic, conesetter, 16:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 16:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 16:06
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 16:02
Re: Linear algebra question, leox, 16:00
Re: Sofia Kovalevsky, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 15:58
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, willo_thewisp, 15:54
Re: The conical inverse, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 15:52
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Tim Peters, 15:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:47
Re: chromatic number of the plane: open problem, Lee Rudolph, 15:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 15:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 15:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:35
Re: high school trigonometry?, matt271829-news, 15:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 15:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:22
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 15:22
Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Butch Malahide, 15:19
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Tim Peters, 15:18
4 minutes 640x480 Mandelbrot zoom video., Janek Kozicki, 15:17
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:11
Re: chromatic number of the plane: open problem, Butch Malahide, 15:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:07
Re: Deepening puzzle, Karenia Brevis, 15:04
Re: Why will Cantor be a target for cranks?, Jacko, 15:03
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Christopher J. Henrich, 15:00
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, William Hughes, 14:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:57
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, Old Autodidact, 14:56
Re: Sum of Series, M.J.T. Guy, 14:55
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, marcus_b, 14:52
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, DmitryKovtun, 14:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:50
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, marcus_b, 14:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:46
Re: The conical inverse, Spoonfed, 14:40
Re: chromatic number of the plane: open problem, Robert Israel, 14:39
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, Randy Poe, 14:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:35
Re: A Simple Probability Problem, Randy Poe, 14:31
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Randy Poe, 14:25
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, marcus_b, 14:24
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Virgil, 14:24
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 14:21
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Chip Eastham, 14:17
A Simple Probability Problem, Old Autodidact, 14:16
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Chip Eastham, 14:12
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 14:01
Re: chromatic number of the plane: open problem, Butch Malahide, 13:58
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, marcus_b, 13:57
Re: Object Ring Challenges, jstevh, 13:56
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, marcus_b, 13:55
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 13:51
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, David Moran, 13:40
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, David Moran, 13:38
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 13:36
Re: Linear algebra question, fernando revilla, 13:21
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, Chip Eastham, 13:18
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 13:14
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 13:12
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, William Hughes, 13:01
Re: JSH: Deepening puzzle, marcus_b, 13:01
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 12:53
Re: formal for all metas, galathaea, 12:50
Re: high school trigonometry?, ram, 12:50
Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Dave Seaman, 12:48
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, gjedwards, 12:40
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Randy Poe, 12:39
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), rich burge, 12:37
Re: infinite dimensional theory, Zbigniew Karno, 12:37
Re: Question on the Christoffel symbol, Igor Khavkine, 12:32
Re: uri geller, The Last Danish Pastry, 12:28
Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Dave L. Renfro, 12:18
JSH: Deepening puzzle, jstevh, 12:13
Re: bijections on REALS, Dave L. Renfro, 12:08
Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Dave L. Renfro, 12:05
Re: bijections on REALS, Dave L. Renfro, 12:01
Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", G. A. Edgar, 12:00
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 11:58
Re: Sofia Kovalevsky, Christopher J. Henrich, 11:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 11:55
Re:Area of an astroid, George Orwell, 11:54
Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Dave Seaman, 11:51
Re: "well ordering" & "total ordering", Dave L. Renfro, 11:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 11:38
Re: Sofia Kovalevsky, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 11:36
Re: about infinite dimensional theory, Zbigniew Karno, 11:34
Re: about infinite dimensional theory, Zbigniew Karno, 11:32
Re: Object Ring Challenges, hagman, 11:29
Re: Turing machine example, Nick, 11:21
Re: Seventeen months., fernando revilla, 11:20
Re: Question about logic, Nick, 11:16
Gud Morning! Amazing Info, Todaysact@xxxxxxxxx, 11:09
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, John Jones, 11:08
Re: bijections on REALS, Spitfire, 11:08
Re: Area of an astroid, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 11:08
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Martin Winer, 11:07
Re: Seventeen months., fernando revilla, 11:06
"well ordering" & "total ordering", Spitfire, 11:05
Re: Limit cycle oscillator, Sorcerer, 11:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 10:59
Limit cycle oscillator, pApAk, 10:55
Re: karek�klerin toplam�, David W . Cantrell, 10:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Albrecht, 10:48
Re: Question on definition of transcendental numbers, Dave L. Renfro, 10:48
Re: Inverse 1/x function complex analytic, Lee Rudolph, 10:47
Turing machine example, Swifty, 10:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 10:42
Inverse 1/x function complex analytic, Zinc Potterman, 10:40
Re: high school trigonometry?, matt271829-news, 10:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 10:25
Linear algebra question, leox, 10:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:24
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 10:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 10:16
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Jonathan Hoyle, 10:15
Re: improved sieve of erastothenes, luiroto, 10:13
Re: (x+1)^(1/2), Zdislav V. Kovarik, 10:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 10:09
unit disc, complex numbers, axioms, Holger Merkel, 10:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 10:07
Question on the Christoffel symbol, GRseminar, 10:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 10:07
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:02
Re: (x+1)^(1/2), Zdislav V. Kovarik, 09:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:53
Re: Object Ring Challenges, Frank J. Lhota, 09:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 09:49
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Arturo Magidin, 09:48
Re: how to generate an orthorgonal matrix (see detail), Zdislav V. Kovarik, 09:47
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Jon Slaughter, 09:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:27
Re: bijections on REALS, Rupert, 09:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:18
Re: Question on definition of transcendental numbers, Rupert, 09:15
Re: improved sieve of erastothenes, Pubkeybreaker, 09:14
bijections on REALS, Spitfire, 09:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:13
Re: high school trigonometry?, ram, 09:01
Re: high school trigonometry?, ram, 09:01
Re: Is it possible to define an addition on the unit circle ?, hagman, 08:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:47
improved sieve of erastothenes, JAVIER RAMOS HERMAN, 08:41
Re: Using exponents with two distinct product operations, William Elliot, 08:39
Re: Matrix question, hoffmann, 08:27
Re: nested subspaces, David C . Ullrich, 08:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:56
Is it possible to define an addition on the unit circle ?, 2Pac, 07:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:47
help! calculus of variation problem., itsing, 07:37
help! calculus of variation problem., itsing, 07:37
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Jesse F. Hughes, 07:36
Re: Question on definition of transcendental numbers, Mate, 07:14
Re: high school trigonometry?, Nick, 06:35
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, aatu . koskensilta, 06:25
~~~~^ in Cars * FreeVids* ~~~^~~, google98.email10@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:23
Using exponents with two distinct product operations, Lee Marks, 06:20
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, lugita15, 06:17
Re: chromatic number of the plane: open problem, David Bernier, 06:00
New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 18, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:56
Re: The problem related with norms used in algebra., Gary Cooper, 05:52
Re: Another algebra problem related with cyclotomy polynomial., Rupert, 05:49
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 05:44
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Rupert, 05:40
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, T.H. Ray, 05:35
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, Tim Peters, 05:32
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., T.H. Ray, 05:24
Re: The problem related with norms used in algebra., Rupert, 05:20
Short and direct proof of FLT published (#4), Nico Benschop, 05:20
Re: Question about logic, aatu . koskensilta, 05:11
Re: Cowards - where did everyone "run off" to ? Re: PI random? Debate run, T.H. Ray, 05:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 05:04
Re: Question about logic, Nick, 04:57
The problem related with norms used in algebra., Gary Cooper, 04:57
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 04:51
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, jankrihau, 04:37
Re: JSH: Good news and bad news, José Carlos Santos, 04:30
Re: Parametric solutions of Euler Brick?, Proginoskes, 04:25
Re: formal for all metas, aatu . koskensilta, 04:21
Re: value, William Elliot, 04:17
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Albrecht, 04:16
JSH: Good news and bad news, jstevh, 04:03
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Han de Bruijn, 04:02
Re: Coordinate transformation, Christian, 03:57
Re: Another algebra problem related with cyclotomy polynomial., Gary Cooper, 03:57
Re: Another algebra problem related with cyclotomy polynomial., Gary Cooper, 03:52
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Han de Bruijn, 03:51
uri geller, uri.geller.jokes@xxxxxxxxx, 03:46
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 03:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 03:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 03:41
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 03:37
Re: Question on definition of transcendental numbers, Tonico, 03:32
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, Ray Koopman, 03:30
Re: Why is cantor a target for cranks, Tonico, 03:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han . deBruijn, 03:20
Re: Seventeen months., galathaea, 02:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 02:35
Re: Question about Programming a Turing Machine, frame, 02:34
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Michael Press, 02:27
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, G . Frege, 02:25
Re: Cowards - where did everyone "run off" to ? Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), fishfry, 02:24
Re: Sofia Kovalevsky, Larry Hammick, 02:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 02:17
Re: value, Robert Israel, 02:17
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, G . Frege, 02:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 02:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 02:06
测试一下, dowebs, 02:06
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Rob Johnson, 01:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 01:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 01:38
Back on topic - Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 01:35
Re: Sofia Kovalevsky, The Ghost In The Machine, 01:31
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, Robert Israel, 01:28
why do muons work in catalyzing fusion? Is the force of gravity not involved? Re: muons should provide the answer as to whether the nucleus has gravity, a_plutonium, 01:25
Re: chromatic number of the plane: open problem, Proginoskes, 01:24
Re: Sofia Kovalevsky, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:22
Re: Inverse Fibonacci serie, Proginoskes, 01:18
Re: Pseudoinversion, carlos, 01:12
Re: JSH: Re: Algebraic integers is a flawed ring, junoexpress, 01:07
Re: Another algebra problem related with cyclotomy polynomial., Rupert, 01:03
Re: Sofia Kovalevsky, Larry Hammick, 01:01
Re: Another algebra problem related with cyclotomy polynomial., Gary Cooper, 00:50
Re: Another algebra problem related with cyclotomy polynomial., Arturo Magidin, 00:49
Re: Another algebra problem related with cyclotomy polynomial., Rupert, 00:42
Re: Question on definition of transcendental numbers, Rupert, 00:37
Another algebra problem related with cyclotomy polynomial., Gary Cooper, 00:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 00:33
Re: Why is cantor a target for cranks, Michael Press, 00:28
Cowards - where did everyone "run off" to ? Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 00:11
Re: Representation by three squares!, Gerry, 00:04

December 17, 2006

Re: Pseudoinversion, Verbal Kint, 23:42
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 23:40
Re: Pseudoinversion, Verbal Kint, 23:37
Re: The proof of the Riemann hypothesis, Hisanobu Shinya, 23:36
value, malik_asif07, 23:29
Re: Pseudoinversion, carlos, 23:28
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, Bill Taylor, 23:20
Re: Question on definition of transcendental numbers, WassilyDali, 23:12
Re: high school trigonometry?, junoexpress, 23:11
Re: high school trigonometry?, Solid State 80, 23:04
Pseudoinversion, Verbal Kint, 23:00
Sofia Kovalevsky, JJ, 23:00
Re: Godel again: 'This statement has no proof in any system' T/F, Zim Olson, 22:20
Re: Question on definition of transcendental numbers, Virgil, 22:19
Re: Moment of inertia, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 22:18
Question on definition of transcendental numbers, WassilyDali, 22:14
Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Michael Moroney, 21:28
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 21:25
Moment of inertia, Eric, 21:23
?? which reals ??, galathaea, 21:01
Re: Wanted gay boyfriend 17 years old up str/Hr, James, 20:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:51
Re: Distance learning for a PhD in mathematics?, barr, 20:17
Re: Expected value of a matrix and it's trace, Lee Rudolph, 20:09
Re: Wanted gay boyfriend 17 years old up str/Hr, Arturo Magidin, 20:06
chromatic number of the plane: open problem, David Bernier, 19:38
Re: number of odd/even fixpointfree permutations, Robert Israel, 19:37
Re: Seventeen months., drmwecker, 19:36
godel numbering exist only for finite specifications, galathaea, 19:29
Re: ODE solutions always go to infinity, Robert Israel, 19:17
Re: Discrete Math Video, Nick, 19:12
Re: Expected value of a matrix and it's trace, Robert Israel, 19:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 19:00
Re: the constructivist line, galathaea, 18:54
the constructivist line, galathaea, 18:50
Re: anti-Lipschitz, Robert Israel, 18:48
formal for all metas, galathaea, 18:39
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., hagman, 18:36
Why is cantor a target for cranks, Tonico, 18:22
Re: how to generate an orthorgonal matrix (see detail), loic-dev, 18:08
Re: formal for all metas, galathaea, 17:54
Re: it is my homework help me, Peter L. Montgomery, 17:52
Re: how to write sin as a recursive function?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:41
Harris Eat Shit, Santa, 17:34
Discrete Math Video, km8080nospam, 17:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:23
formal for all metas, galathaea, 17:21
Re: general gre math question, john, 17:17
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 17:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:01
Re: Close but no cigar!, Danny, 16:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:57
Re: Mann-Kendall confidence level, Ray Koopman, 16:50
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, aatu . koskensilta, 16:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:23
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:10
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, abo, 16:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:05
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 15:52
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 15:47
Re: JSH: Algebraic integers is a flawed ring, marcus_b, 15:47
Re: Inverse Fibonacci serie, alex.lupas, 15:38
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 15:36
Re: JSH: Algebraic integers is a flawed ring, Tim Peters, 15:35
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, aatu . koskensilta, 15:31
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 15:22
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:14
Re: Close but no cigar!, Badger, 15:11
JSH: Re: Algebraic integers is a flawed ring, marcus_b, 15:04
Re: Ordinals, Butch Malahide, 14:55
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 14:55
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, george, 14:39
Re: Laderman's algorithm for 3x3 matrix multiplication, Chris, 14:35
Re: Laderman's algorithm for 3x3 matrix multiplication, Phil Carmody, 14:24
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 14:24
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Spitfire, 14:17
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, aatu . koskensilta, 14:16
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 14:15
Re: Laderman's algorithm for 3x3 matrix multiplication, Phil Carmody, 14:14
Re: variance caculation, Herman Rubin, 14:13
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, aatu . koskensilta, 14:12
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 14:09
Laderman's algorithm for 3x3 matrix multiplication, Chris, 14:05
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:57
Re: Godel again: 'This statement has no proof in any system' T/F, aatu . koskensilta, 13:51
##### Free Hot Wallpapers #####, Information, 13:51
Re: Wanted gay boyfriend 17 years old up str/Hr, huangxienchen, 13:50
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, Math1723, 13:48
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:48
Re: StrongNuclear confined to nucleus AND, gravity confined to electron-space region; Huchra & Geller is outline of Atom Totality, cassius . reinecke, 13:45
Re: Close but no cigar!, David Moran, 13:39
Re: Question about logic, aatu . koskensilta, 13:38
Re: Close but no cigar!, Dave, 13:35
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, aatu . koskensilta, 13:33
Re: Wanted gay boyfriend 17 years old up str/Hr, Arturo Magidin, 13:18
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 13:15
Re: Close but no cigar!, David Moran, 13:11
Close but no cigar!, Danny, 12:54
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Arturo Magidin, 12:47
Re: tiling problem, James Waldby, 12:47
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Nick, 12:35
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, kunzmilan, 12:31
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 12:27
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Dave Seaman, 12:15
Wanted gay boyfriend 17 years old up str/Hr, Arturo Magidin, 12:14
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Spitfire, 12:10
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Arturo Magidin, 12:04
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Arturo Magidin, 12:03
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Spitfire, 11:59
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:57
nested subspaces, Philips, 11:56
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Spitfire, 11:55
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Arturo Magidin, 11:54
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Arturo Magidin, 11:52
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Spitfire, 11:48
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Spitfire, 11:46
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Spitfire, 11:44
Re: Question about Programming a Turing Machine, Chris Smith, 11:29
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, kunzmilan, 11:28
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 11:27
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 11:24
Re: Seventeen months., fernando revilla, 11:21
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), T.H. Ray, 11:18
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 10:59
Re: Mann-Kendall confidence level, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:56
Inverse Fibonacci serie, kunzmilan, 10:53
high school trigonometry?, ram, 10:53
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), huangxienchen, 10:48
Re: Wanted gay boyfriend 17 years old up str/Hr, Dave L. Renfro, 10:46
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Rob Johnson, 10:38
Re: Continuity of sum of Fourier series, José Carlos Santos, 10:37
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Arturo Magidin, 10:33
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, José Carlos Santos, 10:30
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Arturo Magidin, 10:29
Re: Godel again: 'This statement has no proof in any system' T/F, Zim Olson, 10:29
Re: algebra with finite field..., Arturo Magidin, 10:22
Re: Riemannian geometry, Nick, 09:53
Re: Seventeen months., Nick, 09:50
Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:41
Re: Formal Symbols, Gerry, 09:28
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 09:26
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Spitfire, 09:21
Question about logic, sylsau, 09:14
Re: proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Dave Seaman, 09:14
proof using cantor's diagonalization argument, Spitfire, 09:00
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 08:59
Re: Coordinate transformation, moorthy, 08:56
Re: how to write sin as a recursive function?, Saurav, 08:51
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 08:43
Re: general gre math question, J�rgen R ., 08:23
Continuity of sum of Fourier series, José Carlos Santos, 08:23
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Timothy Murphy, 08:22
Seventeen months., fernando revilla, 08:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:21
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Timothy Murphy, 08:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:05
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 08:01
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 07:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:51
about infinite dimensional theory, Philips, 07:50
Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?, Larry Hammick, 07:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:25
Re: Area of an astroid, Larry Hammick, 07:13
Riemannian geometry, karlfredrickson, 07:06
Re: Godel again: 'This statement has no proof in any system' T/F, T.H. Ray, 07:00
Re: Devil's Staircase - Cantor Set Version, A N Niel, 06:12
Re: general gre math question, Phil Carmody, 05:54
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, kunzmilan, 05:46
Re: how to write sin as a recursive function?, Aage Andersen, 05:44
general gre math question, john, 05:37
Re: Ordinals, William Elliot, 05:23
Re: Challenge Algorithm, frame, 04:47
Re: JSH: Short explanation, why error is so big, Red, 04:34
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Nick, 04:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:06
muons should provide the answer as to whether the nucleus has gravity Re: Nagamine muon catalyzed fusion supports no gravity in nucleus, a_plutonium, 04:02
Re: Expected value of a matrix and it's trace, kunzmilan, 03:52
Re: Off topic but will give (all) plenty of smiles ;-), businessman, 03:47
Re: infinite dimensional theory, Philips, 03:47
Re: peudo-inverse of a perturbed matrix, jonagold, 03:40
Re: Transposing and transversing, Uenal S. Mutlu, 03:36
Transposing and transversing, kunzmilan, 03:22
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), galathaea, 03:18
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, Robert Israel, 03:11
Re: Mann-Kendall confidence level, Ray Koopman, 03:08
Re: StrongNuclear confined to nucleus AND, gravity confined to electron-space region; Huchra & Geller is outline of Atom Totality, a_plutonium, 03:08
Re: Looking for Big Cocks, huangxienchen, 03:08
peudo-inverse of a perturbed matrix, jonagold, 02:39
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Tim Peters, 02:35
Re: variance caculation, Daniel Mayost, 02:31
Re: Matrix of orthogonal projection is symmetric, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:26
Re: Formal Symbols, Proginoskes, 02:23
Re: how to write sin as a recursive function?, Gib Bogle, 02:02
Re: Area of an astroid, Cary, 02:01
variance caculation, xingnw, 01:57
Re: Formal Symbols, Paul Sperry, 01:56
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Nam Nguyen, 01:42
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Tim Peters, 01:38
Re: mesure, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 01:36
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Proginoskes, 01:23
Re: Area of an astroid, Proginoskes, 01:20
Re: how to write sin as a recursive function?, Proginoskes, 01:15
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 01:10
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 01:00
Re: Area of an astroid, Eli Luong, 00:58
Re: how to write sin as a recursive function?, paulwvanc, 00:51
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Jonathan Hoyle, 00:33
Re: Area of an astroid, Cary, 00:26
Re: Area of an astroid, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 00:23
Re: how to write sin as a recursive function?, DmitryKovtun, 00:21
Re: Formal Symbols, William Elliot, 00:17
Re: Calculating flux of a curl, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 00:17
how to write sin as a recursive function?, paulwvanc, 00:16

December 16, 2006

Re: Derivation Question, Cary, 23:46
Re: Wanted gay boyfriend 17 years old up str/Hr, Christopher J. Henrich, 23:20
Re: Wanted gay boyfriend 17 years old up str/Hr, Jesse F. Hughes, 23:19
Calculating flux of a curl, Eli Luong, 23:15
Area of an astroid, Eli Luong, 23:06
Formal Symbols, Jon, 23:05
Re: JSH: Applied Abstract Algebra online book, David Ames, 22:56
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., zuhair, 22:26
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., zuhair, 22:22
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 22:15
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Herman Rubin, 22:05
Re: Distance learning for a PhD in mathematics?, Herman Rubin, 21:57
Re: Rational Triangle, Daniel Mayost, 21:54
Re: algebra with finite field..., mina_world, 21:41
Re: algebra with finite field..., mina_world, 21:29
Rational Triangle, Deep, 21:25
Re: Derivation Question, Daniel Mayost, 21:17
Re: God's IQ, Zim Olson, 21:07
Re: Matrix of orthogonal projection is symmetric, Lee Rudolph, 20:59
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Newberry, 20:55
Re: Matrix of orthogonal projection is symmetric, smn, 20:28
Re: Why is arithmetic mean being used in calculating standard deviation!? Why not some thing else!?, Nick, 20:23
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., MoeBlee, 19:44
Re: Linear Programming Problem..., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:43
Re: indeterminate-problem(?) in divergent summation, Gottfried Helms, 19:43
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., MoeBlee, 19:41
Re: Looking for Big Cocks, Phil Carmody, 19:40
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, MoeBlee, 19:38
Devil's Staircase - Cantor Set Version, Leonard M. Wapner, 19:32
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 19:32
Looking for Big Cocks, Arturo Magidin, 19:31
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Jonathan Hoyle, 19:25
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 19:20
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., zuhair, 19:14
Re: Roots of Real Polynomials, Maury Barbato, 19:10
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 18:55
Multinomial Derangements (Re: Special Derangements), Jarno Suni, 18:55
mesure, J, 18:43
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Michael Press, 18:42
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 18:39
Re: irreducible elements in the set of the real numbers, Rupert, 18:31
Re: irreducible elements in the set of the real numbers, Phil Carmody, 18:30
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Virgil, 18:10
Re: StrongNuclear confined to nucleus AND, gravity confined to electron-space region; Huchra & Geller is outline of Atom Totality, cassius . reinecke, 18:07
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Jesse F. Hughes, 18:03
irreducible elements in the set of the real numbers, Tuvak, 18:00
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Jesse F. Hughes, 17:59
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Virgil, 17:59
Re: Statistics Textbooks That Convey Insight?, kmbunday@xxxxxxxxx, 17:54
Re: Statistics Textbooks That Convey Insight?, kmbunday@xxxxxxxxx, 17:50
Derivation Question, NPDave, 17:49
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Peter_Smith, 17:23
Re: Linear Programming Problem..., FiftySix, 17:15
Re: Linear Programming Problem..., FiftySix, 17:14
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), Bill Dubuque, 17:14
Re: Matrix of orthogonal projection is symmetric, smn, 17:06
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han . deBruijn, 17:01
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Jesse F. Hughes, 16:43
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:37
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, abo, 16:36
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han . deBruijn, 16:29
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han . deBruijn, 16:27
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Jesse F. Hughes, 16:14
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 16:13
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 16:07
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Keith Ramsay, 16:01
Re: Sequences and convergence, The World Wide Wade, 15:43
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 15:25
Re: The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, G . Frege, 15:24
Re: Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 15:22
Re: algebra with finite field..., Peter van Rossum, 15:17
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Nam Nguyen, 15:16
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 15:16
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., zuhair, 15:11
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., zuhair, 15:10
Sequences and convergence, Cezanne123, 15:09
Re: Challenge Algorithm, James Waldby, 14:54
Re: algebra with finite field..., Arturo Magidin, 14:52
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Gc, 14:51
Re: Ordinals, Butch Malahide, 14:50
Matrix of orthogonal projection is symmetric, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:43
Re: Galileo's Paradox, David R Tribble, 14:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:25
Re: Ordinals, Butch Malahide, 14:18
Re: Breakthroughs in New Physics Dec 12, 2006 Talk On-Line, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 14:18
The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, Math1723, 14:13
StrongNuclear confined to nucleus AND, gravity confined to electron-space region; Huchra & Geller is outline of Atom Totality, a_plutonium, 14:10
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 14:09
Re: Linear Programming Problem..., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:05
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 13:54
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, apoorv, 13:51
The Set of all Sets & Cantor's Proof, Math1723, 13:34
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, The World Wide Wade, 13:31
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Jonathan Hoyle, 13:26
theorem about hilbertian fields, Tuvak, 13:23
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:22
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Jonathan Hoyle, 13:19
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., huangxienchen, 13:17
Small Set theory:Revised., zuhair, 13:16
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Jonathan Hoyle, 13:08
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Lee Rudolph, 13:02
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Jesse F. Hughes, 12:55
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., zuhair, 12:39
De rham's theorem - proof, flamegrilledmonkey, 12:35
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 12:26
Re: Galileo's Paradox, imaginatorium, 12:21
Re: Roots of Real Polynomials, Mate, 12:19
Re: Matrix: exp(a).exp(b)=exp(a+b) if [exp(a),exp(b)]=0 ?, G. A. Edgar, 12:07
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., zuhair, 11:58
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., zuhair, 11:56
Re: any one tried this before?, galathaea, 11:44
Re: indeterminate-problem(?) in divergent summation, alex.lupas, 11:43
!! wittgenstein a crank !!, galathaea, 11:41
Linear Programming Problem..., FiftySix, 11:31
algebra with finite field..., mina_world, 11:31
Re: ODE solutions always go to infinity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 11:22
any one tried this before?, paulwvanc, 10:21
Re: Applied Abstract Algebra online book, DmitryKovtun, 10:18
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, abo, 10:10
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, G . Frege, 10:05
Re: ODE solutions always go to infinity, Kira Yamato, 10:04
Matrix: exp(a).exp(b)=exp(a+b) if [exp(a),exp(b)]=0 ?, cos1234, 10:01
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, matt271829-news, 09:58
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, abo, 09:52
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 09:34
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 09:30
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 09:18
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 08:55
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, Duncan Smith, 08:46
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Jesse F. Hughes, 08:31
Re: Roots of Real Polynomials, Maury Barbato, 08:29
Re: A problem realted with cyclotomic polynomial!, Gary Cooper, 07:51
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Albrecht, 07:12
number of odd/even fixpointfree permutations, mathemagier, 07:01
Re: Distance learning for a PhD in mathematics?, aatu . koskensilta, 06:57
Re: Complex roots of polynomials, smn, 06:52
Re: Complex roots of polynomials, smn, 06:46
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 06:45
Re: ODE solutions always go to infinity, Ulysse from CH, 06:43
Re: Complex roots of polynomials, Ulysse from CH, 06:23
Re: Sum of Series, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 06:17
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 06:07
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Lee Rudolph, 06:04
Re: Sum of Series, Tim Peters, 05:59
ODE solutions always go to infinity, Kira Yamato, 05:56
Re: Sum of Series, José Carlos Santos, 05:47
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Franziska Neugebauer, 05:38
Coordinate transformation, Christian, 05:10
Re: Dense Subalgebras of C([0,1]), José Carlos Santos, 04:40
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 04:40
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, apoorv, 04:37
Sum of Series, Eric, 04:31
Re: gap between prime number / Opperman's conjecture, Phil Carmody, 04:30
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Tim Peters, 04:26
Re: Ordinals, William Elliot, 04:23
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, apoorv, 04:23
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Michael Press, 04:20
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, apoorv, 04:17
Expected value of a matrix and it's trace, hhsaffar@xxxxxxxxx, 04:06
Re: gap between prime number / Opperman's conjecture, Frédéric Devaux, 03:52
Re: Challenge Algorithm, frame, 03:42
smashing pions or muons with protons to form neutrons Re: Nagamine muon catalyzed fusion supports no gravity in nucleus Re: ratio of helium to hydrogen in Sun indicates gravity does not exist in the nucleus Re: Sun perhaps already provides us with the answer Re: Experiment that proves gravity does not exist in nuclear regions of atoms, a_plutonium, 03:34
volume of Universe is 10^80 m^3 Re: why gravity as a Coulomb force is 10^40 weaker, a_plutonium, 03:13
Re: Question about Programming a Turing Machine, frame, 03:12
Re: simple partial derivitative puzzle/question--simple yet hard, Jim Black, 03:05
Re: divide polynominal equation???, Virgil, 02:51
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Virgil, 02:34
Re: JSH: Applied Abstract Algebra online book, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:22
divide polynominal equation???, marslee, 02:21
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, Butch Malahide, 02:18
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Proginoskes, 01:55
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, Butch Malahide, 01:40
simple partial derivitative puzzle/question--simple yet hard, opensourcearts, 01:36
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Jonathan Hoyle, 01:16
Re: Cardinality and Proper classes., Rupert, 00:56
Re: JSH: Applied Abstract Algebra online book, danielmryan, 00:53
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, Michael Press, 00:50
Cardinality and Proper classes., zuhair, 00:41
Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:35
Re: Dense Subalgebras of C([0,1]), Robert Sheskey, 00:33
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 00:32
PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes), Martin Winer, 00:17
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., huangxienchen, 00:03

December 15, 2006

Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Newberry, 23:52
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 23:51
interesting generalised polynomials, galathaea, 23:49
Re: finding characteristics polynomial equation ?, Michael, 23:41
Re: JSH: Applied Abstract Algebra online book, efiish, 23:38
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Jesse F. Hughes, 23:31
Re: Uniform continuity, clowell333, 23:26
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, fishfry, 23:21
Re: Distance learning for a PhD in mathematics?, fishfry, 23:19
Re: JSH: Applied Abstract Algebra online book, Chip Eastham, 23:18
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 23:14
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., huangxienchen, 23:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 23:11
JSH: Applied Abstract Algebra online book, DmitryKovtun, 23:08
Re: Roots of Real Polynomials, Virgil, 22:55
Re: [] reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, William Elliot, 22:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:46
markov chain question, lfssuif, 22:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Newberry, 22:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:22
Re: Poisson Distribution and Drug Effectiveness, Amateur, 22:19
Re: Uniform continuity, The World Wide Wade, 22:16
Re: finding characteristics polynomial equation ?, Larry Hammick, 22:08
Re: finding characteristics polynomial equation ?, saturnlee, 21:57
Re: JSH: Short explanation, why error is so big, Tim Peters, 21:49
Re: Expectation of a stopped sum, quebecstat, 21:36
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, fernando revilla, 21:33
Re: Mann-Kendall confidence level, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:27
Expectation of a stopped sum, ProbaWannabe, 21:19
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 21:16
Re: Uniform continuity, clowell333, 21:15
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., MoeBlee, 21:14
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, G . Frege, 21:02
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 20:50
Re: Uniform continuity, clowell333, 20:43
Re: Distance learning for a PhD in mathematics?, anon5874, 20:41
Re: Roots of Real Polynomials, Mate, 20:32
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, James Dolan, 20:31
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 20:29
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 20:29
Re: Spheres Inside A Cube, Paul T., 20:29
Re: Mann-Kendall confidence level, Ray Koopman, 20:27
Re: anti-Lipschitz, The World Wide Wade, 20:26
Distance learning for a PhD in mathematics?, Bill J., 20:15
Re: (x+1)^(1/2), Michael Press, 20:02
Re: PGL(3,2), Rupert, 19:45
Re: number with Euler., Rupert, 19:44
Re: Dense Subalgebras of C([0,1]), José Carlos Santos, 19:35
Re: closed curve expansion, novis, 19:28
Re: Representation by three squares!, Pete Klimek, 19:22
Re: [] reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, Proginoskes, 19:19
Re: Mann-Kendall confidence level, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:17
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), steve, 19:14
Re: anti-Lipschitz, Dave L. Renfro, 19:04
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 18:58
Re: Complex roots of polynomials-, JEMebius, 18:50
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 18:50
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 18:46
Re: closed curve expansion, matt271829-news, 18:42
Re: gap between prime number / Opperman's conjecture, Phil Carmody, 18:42
Re: Representation by three squares!, Gerry, 18:39
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 18:30
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 18:27
Re: Product of commutators, Lee Rudolph, 18:18
Re: Mann-Kendall confidence level, Ray Koopman, 18:13
Re: Mann-Kendall confidence level, Ray Koopman, 18:03
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Gc, 18:03
Re: finding characteristics polynomial equation ?, Michael, 18:01
Re: finding characteristics polynomial equation ?, Benjamin Kreuter, 17:59
Re: Product of commutators, bluelabel, 17:59
Re: Representation by three squares!, Larry Hammick, 17:58
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 17:57
closed curve expansion, novis, 17:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:56
finding characteristics polynomial equation ?, saturnlee, 17:55
Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:54
gap between prime number / Opperman's conjecture, Frédéric Devaux, 17:53
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 17:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:38
Re: Roots of Real Polynomials, anon5874, 17:38
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:37
Complex roots of polynomials, Benjamin Kreuter, 17:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:34
Re: Product of commutators, Arturo Magidin, 17:31
Re: Jech's Set Theory, MoeBlee, 17:28
Re: Breakthroughs in New Physics Dec 12, 2006 Talk On-Line, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:23
Re: set of intergers, Dave L. Renfro, 17:23
Re: Roots of Real Polynomials, Mate, 17:23
Re: Roots of Real Polynomials, Tim Peters, 17:22
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Gc, 17:22
Re: Roots of Real Polynomials, G. A. Edgar, 17:22
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 17:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:21
Dense Subalgebras of C([0,1]), Maury Barbato, 17:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:17
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:14
Re: Integer Triangle, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:08
Re: Inverse Cone Geometry, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:03
Re: Roots of Real Polynomials, David T. Ashley, 17:02
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Jacko, 17:02
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, lugita15, 17:01
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Gc, 16:59
Re: Roots of Real Polynomials, Maury Barbato, 16:59
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:57
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:52
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, hagman, 16:47
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 16:47
Re: Representation by three squares!, Gerry, 16:43
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 16:42
Re: Subalgebras of C([0,1]), Maury Barbato, 16:41
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, David M Einstein, 16:40
Re: Infinite sets., Jesse F. Hughes, 16:38
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, jankrihau, 16:35
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 16:31
Re: Infinite sets., Andrew Usher, 16:29
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 16:21
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 16:21
Subalgebras of C([0,1]), Maury Barbato, 16:14
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, matt271829-news, 16:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:11
Roots of Real Polynomials, Maury Barbato, 16:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Math1723, 15:54
Re: Representation by three squares!, Timothy Murphy, 15:53
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Albert van der Horst, 15:42
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Rob Johnson, 15:38
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 15:37
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, pauldepstein, 15:34
Re: Hypogeometric using binomial approx word problem, Taria, 15:26
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:25
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Jesse F. Hughes, 15:23
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Jesse F. Hughes, 15:22
Re: it is my homework help me, brian . the . wray, 15:14
Re: why gravity as a Coulomb force is 10^40 weaker Re: gravity as magnetic monopole gives 5 immediate predictions Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 15:14
Re: why gravity as a Coulomb force is 10^40 weaker Re: gravity as magnetic monopole gives 5 immediate predictions Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, David Bostwick, 15:07
why gravity as a Coulomb force is 10^40 weaker Re: gravity as magnetic monopole gives 5 immediate predictions Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 15:03
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:01
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, The World Wide Wade, 14:55
Re: Product of commutators, bluelabel, 14:48
Re: Hypogeometric using binomial approx word problem, Dick, 14:46
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, matt271829-news, 14:46
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, apoorv, 14:43
Re: more on lipschitz function, The World Wide Wade, 14:43
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 14:41
Re: infinite dimensional theory, Zbigniew Karno, 14:41
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 14:37
Re: set of intergers, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:37
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 14:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:34
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 14:34
gravity as magnetic monopole gives 5 immediate predictions Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 14:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 14:29
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 14:29
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:29
Re: set of intergers, Michael Stemper, 14:27
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:25
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Jesse F. Hughes, 14:24
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Jesse F. Hughes, 14:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:19
Re: Infinite sets., Jesse F. Hughes, 14:17
Re: Strong law large numbers Sn/n, Robert Israel, 14:12
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, Robert Israel, 14:08
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 14:07
Re: how to generate an orthorgonal matrix (see detail), M.J.T. Guy, 14:05
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 14:05
Re: ^^^^^^ High School Videos ^^$^^^^, Retired Chief, 14:04
Re: Challenge Algorithm, Bill, 14:04
Re: Challenge Algorithm, Bill, 13:59
Re: tiling problem, matt271829-news, 13:55
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 13:55
Re: Multiple Reflections in Ellipse, Robert Israel, 13:51
Strong law large numbers Sn/n, ProbaWannabe, 13:48
Re: infinite dimensional theory, Zbigniew Karno, 13:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:39
Re: Question about Programming a Turing Machine, Chris Smith, 13:37
Re: infinite dimensional theory, Zbigniew Karno, 13:36
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 13:32
Re: it is my homework help me, Michael Press, 13:32
Re: tangent bundle, Lee Rudolph, 13:31
Re: Stopping time question, Robert Israel, 13:30
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 13:29
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Jacko, 13:27
Re: assignment, Michael Stemper, 13:25
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, apoorv, 13:25
Re: Differentiable manifolds interpretation, Jon Slaughter, 13:24
Re: Differentiable manifolds interpretation, Gon�alo Rodrigues, 13:16
Mann-Kendall confidence level, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:16
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, marcus_b, 13:14
Re: Hypogeometric using binomial approx word problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:11
Re: Apocalyptic numbers, christian.bau, 13:09
Re: Apocalyptic numbers, blaetterrascheln, 13:08
Re: Apocalyptic numbers, Robert Israel, 13:06
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, CBTuee@xxxxxxxxx, 13:06
Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, jankrihau, 13:03
Re: Question about Programming a Turing Machine, frame, 12:49
Re: Need an unusual formula for wind vectors, Michael Stemper, 12:49
Re: Infinite sets., Andrew Usher, 12:46
Re: it is my homework help me, Robert Israel, 12:37
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, CBTuee@xxxxxxxxx, 12:30
Re: Product of commutators, Arturo Magidin, 12:27
A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading, pauldepstein, 12:24
Re: Infinite sets., Jonathan Hoyle, 12:17
Product of commutators, bluelabel, 12:16
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 12:16
Re: tangent bundle, Philips, 12:15
Re: Infinite matrices, carlos, 12:14
Re: FOUNDER OF TRUE GEOLOGY CALLS A SPADE A SPADE,,,., Larry Hammick, 12:13
Multiple Reflections in Ellipse, Narasimham, 12:13
Infinite matrices, uukuuk, 12:10
Re: Hypogeometric using binomial approx word problem, Dick, 12:04
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 12:02
Re: Hypogeometric using binomial approx word problem, Dick, 12:02
Re: Is this an agreeable statement?, Michael Press, 12:01
Re: tangent bundle, Lee Rudolph, 12:00
Re: Representation by three squares!, Gerry, 11:58
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 11:55
tangent bundle, Philips, 11:55
Re: Representation by three squares!, Gerry, 11:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jonathan Hoyle, 11:39
Re: infinite dimensional theory, Philips, 11:38
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 11:36
Re: Rudin, ArtflDodgr, 11:36
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 11:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 11:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 11:30
Re: tiling problem, rumpuscat, 11:27
Re: Differentiable manifolds interpretation, Jon Slaughter, 11:24
Re: Jech's Set Theory, aatu . koskensilta, 11:09
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Larry Hammick, 11:08
Re: assignment, The Qurqirish Dragon, 11:08
Re: Question about Programming a Turing Machine, Rick Decker, 11:03
Stopping time question, ProbaWannabe, 11:00
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., aatu . koskensilta, 10:56
Re: more on lipschitz function, novis, 10:55
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., G . Frege, 10:54
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Jacko, 10:54
Re: Representation by three squares!, Gerry, 10:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:53
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 10:52
Re: infinite dimensional theory, Philips, 10:51
Re: more on lipschitz function, novis, 10:48
Re: more on lipschitz function, David C . Ullrich, 10:41
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 10:39
Re: problem involving lipschitz condition, David C . Ullrich, 10:35
Question about Programming a Turing Machine, rhaazy, 10:33
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., G . Frege, 10:33
Re: PGL(3,2), PaulHjelmstad, 10:32
Re: Infinite sets., Jonathan Hoyle, 10:32
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 10:31
Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:30
Hypogeometric using binomial approx word problem, Taria, 10:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 10:17
Re: infinite dimensional theory, Zbigniew Karno, 10:08
Re: tensor product of complexes, Timothy Murphy, 10:03
Re: bibliography needed, Dave L. Renfro, 10:00
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Michael Stemper, 09:57
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 09:52
Re: The proof of mass vector., Randy Poe, 09:34
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:33
Re: Differentiable manifolds interpretation, Gon�alo Rodrigues, 09:29
Re: Representation by three squares!, Jyrki Lahtonen, 09:29
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 09:28
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Charlie-Boo, 09:24
Re: Poisson Distribution and Drug Effectiveness, Taria, 09:21
Questions on transition between metastable states, Dong Ta, 09:15
Re: Challenge Algorithm, v . srikar, 09:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 08:54
Re: bibliography needed, Philips, 08:35
Re: Challenge Algorithm, guenther vonKnakspot, 08:32
Re: help, Philips, 08:24
Re: help, Philips, 08:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 08:23
tensor product of complexes, michael friedman, 08:19
Challenge Algorithm, Raja, 08:17
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 08:10
Re: Representation by three squares!, Timothy Murphy, 08:10
Inverse Cone Geometry, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:09
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 07:50
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, CapCity, 07:50
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, CapCity, 07:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 07:45
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, fernando revilla, 07:45
Re: human markov chain behaviour, John Bailey, 07:42
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 07:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 07:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 07:32
Re: assignment, Bob Kolker, 07:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:28
Re: assignment, Bob Kolker, 07:27
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Albrecht, 07:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 07:22
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Jesse F. Hughes, 07:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:21
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Jesse F. Hughes, 07:20
Off topic but will give (all) plenty of smiles ;-), fasttrack2a, 07:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 07:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 07:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:09
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 07:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 07:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 07:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:00
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 06:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:57
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 06:57
Re: help, nana, 06:54
Re: help, nana, 06:53
Re: help, nana, 06:51
Re: number with Legendre symbol., mina_world, 06:51
Re: help, nana, 06:50
Re: help, nana, 06:48
Re: [] reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, David Moran, 06:45
wanted! 2nd hand copy of crest of the peacock. Many thanks!, dylan, 06:36
Differentiable manifolds interpretation, Jon Slaughter, 06:30
Re: help, Philips, 05:54
Re: assignment, The Last Danish Pastry, 05:37
Re: it is my homework help me, Michael Press, 05:35
Re: number with Euler., Kira Yamato, 05:30
Re: assignment, Alois Steindl, 05:26
set of intergers, deep04nift@xxxxxxxxx, 05:20
article about primes by Don Zagier, bachmann, 05:16
assignment, deep04nift@xxxxxxxxx, 05:15
Re: A diofantine equation, Helmut Richter, 05:13
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 05:11
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 05:09
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 04:56
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 04:52
Re: Poisson Distribution and Drug Effectiveness, Amateur, 04:40
infinite dimensional theory, Philips, 04:39
Re: Ordinals, Butch Malahide, 04:20
Re: more on lipschitz function, Julien Santini, 04:17
Re: Ordinals, Butch Malahide, 04:13
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 04:03
Re: more on lipschitz function, Julien Santini, 04:02
Re: If Planck mice existed in nuclei then we should hear some squeaking noise Re: if gravity existed in nuclei then we should hear some squecking noise Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, mmeron, 03:59
Re: Compute the confidence interval of the standard deviation, Dani Camps, 03:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 03:50
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, Proginoskes, 03:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 03:45
Re: number with Legendre symbol., Tim Peters, 03:44
Re: simple, but subtle, math/calculus question, Proginoskes, 03:41
Re: (x+1)^(1/2), linux, 03:38
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Nam Nguyen, 03:38
Re: Need an unusual formula for wind vectors-, Chad Speer, 03:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 03:34
If Planck mice existed in nuclei then we should hear some squeaking noise Re: if gravity existed in nuclei then we should hear some squecking noise Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Proginoskes, 03:32
Re: number with Euler., mina_world, 03:31
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., G . Frege, 03:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 03:24
Re: Opinions on mathematics., cbrown, 03:21
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., G . Frege, 03:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 03:18
Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, Proginoskes, 03:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 03:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 03:14
Re: [] reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, Proginoskes, 03:11
Re: Discovery of new 3-dimensional series and 2 formulas/series for expanding combination expansion, Proginoskes, 03:08
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Proginoskes, 03:03
Re: more on lipschitz function, novis, 03:01
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, G . Frege, 02:59
Re: Why is arithmetic mean being used in calculating standard deviation!? Why not some thing else!?, m7ossny, 02:57
number with Legendre symbol., mina_world, 02:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 02:57
Re: Is this an agreeable statement?, Proginoskes, 02:55
indeterminate-problem(?) in divergent summation, Gottfried Helms, 02:54
Re: Integer Triangle, Proginoskes, 02:53
Re: Galileo's Paradox, cbrown, 02:52
Re: Calculating the running time of an algorithm?, Proginoskes, 02:50
Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, Virgil, 02:49
Re: Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., Han de Bruijn, 02:49
Re: How to multiply matrices, Proginoskes, 02:46
Re: A kind of derangements, Proginoskes, 02:43
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 02:34
Re: number with Euler., mina_world, 02:33
more on lipschitz function, novis, 02:33
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 02:29
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Virgil, 02:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 02:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 02:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 02:02
Re: What is this thing known as "=" ?, Phil Carmody, 01:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:45
Re: it is my homework help me, Michael Press, 01:28
Re: simple, but subtle, math/calculus question, Amateur, 01:25
Re: simple, but subtle, math/calculus question, Amateur, 01:21
Re: For God's sake!, Robert Israel, 01:14
Re: help, Robert Israel, 01:12
Re: simple, but subtle, math/calculus question, anon5874, 01:10
Re: simple, but subtle, math/calculus question, Eric Gisse, 01:08
simple, but subtle, math/calculus question, opensourcearts, 00:55
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, DmitryKovtun, 00:43
Are you guys really such a bunch of wimps ....., huangxienchen, 00:23
Re: Books on Stochastic Differential Equations, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 00:10

December 14, 2006

Re: Statistics Textbooks That Convey Insight?, Richard Ulrich, 23:48
Re: For those with greater IQ (above two hundred) - Quote from 'The Nature Of War' {HRI 20051027-V1.6} - (Quote Rev. 1.0.3), Larry Hammick, 23:23
Re: About the Extended Euclidean Algorithm, Larry Hammick, 23:09
Statistica Sinica newly accepted articles, Statistica Sinica, 23:08
how to generate an orthorgonal matrix (see detail), kdsfinger, 23:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, G . Frege, 22:42
What is this thing known as "=" ?, huangxienchen, 22:40
if gravity existed in nuclei then we should hear some squecking noise Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 22:38
Re: it is my homework help me, Dave Seaman, 22:33
Re: Uniform continuity, William Elliot, 22:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 22:17
Re: Statistics Textbooks That Convey Insight?, kmbunday@xxxxxxxxx, 22:16
GR never even defined what "space" is, and no wonder they chased after the fictional graviton particle Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 22:14
[] reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, William Elliot, 22:12
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 22:04
Discovery of new 3-dimensional series and 2 formulas/series for expanding combination expansion, sunils, 22:00
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 21:40
Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Sorcerer, 21:39
Re: tiling problem, matt271829-news, 21:37
Poisson Distribution and Drug Effectiveness, Taria, 21:33
Re: tiling problem, Chip Eastham, 21:27
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Michael Press, 21:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Ralf Bader, 21:18
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 21:11
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 21:06
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 21:00
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 20:58
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, |-|erc, 20:57
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, William Elliot, 20:56
Re: human markov chain behaviour, paulwvanc, 20:56
Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Salmon Egg, 20:46
Apocalyptic numbers, Herman Rubin, 20:39
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., markwh04, 20:36
Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, christian.bau, 20:31
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 20:27
Re: human markov chain behaviour, Rock Brentwood, 20:25
Re: it is my homework help me, christian.bau, 20:23
Re: human markov chain behaviour, Rock Brentwood, 20:23
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Taria, 20:19
Interference maxima, ediptkc, 20:16
Re: ask, Herman Rubin, 20:10
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 20:10
Re: Compute the confidence interval of the standard deviation, Herman Rubin, 20:09
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 20:08
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Ioannis, 20:07
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Ioannis, 20:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:55
Re: human markov chain behaviour, Robert Israel, 19:55
Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 19:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:47
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:44
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Taria, 19:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:40
Re: Need an unusual formula for wind vectors-, David T. Ashley, 19:38
Re: Uniform continuity, Jules, 19:38
Re: Math Midget seeks help with odds, Nick, 19:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:34
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Dan Dima, 19:33
Re: Uniform continuity, The World Wide Wade, 19:29
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Taria, 19:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:28
Re: Uniform continuity, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 19:27
Re: Statistics Textbooks That Convey Insight?, Nick, 19:25
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 19:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 19:09
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 19:09
Uniform continuity, Jthompson5213, 18:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:53
Re: PGL(3,2), Rupert, 18:52
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 18:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:51
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, david petry, 18:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:49
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, david petry, 18:46
Re: number with Euler., Rupert, 18:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:39
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 18:35
Re: Need an unusual formula for wind vectors-, JEMebius, 18:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:24
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 18:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:18
Re: tiling problem, matt271829-news, 18:09
Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, hanson, 18:07
Representation by three squares!, Gerry, 18:07
Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:06
Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, Ken Pledger, 18:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:05
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 18:02
Management Science/Operations Research PhD Fellowships at Lancaster University Management School, Joern Meissner, 18:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:57
Re: it is my homework help me, junoexpress, 17:57
Re: problem involving lipschitz condition, Michael Press, 17:56
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 17:50
Re: Queing with no Wait, danheyman@xxxxxxxxx, 17:47
Re: About the Extended Euclidean Algorithm, Ken Pledger, 17:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:43
Re: it is my homework help me, junoexpress, 17:37
Re: Is this an agreeable statement?, Michael Press, 17:35
Re: it is my homework help me, Randy Poe, 17:35
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 17:32
Re: Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, Uncle Al, 17:32
Re: it is my homework help me, christian.bau, 17:28
Re: Calculus Book Recommendations, Ken Pledger, 17:27
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:25
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 17:18
Re: Integer Triangle, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:13
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:11
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 17:09
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Jonathan Hoyle, 17:08
Re: Uniform and semiregular polyhedra, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:03
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Richard Tobin, 17:02
Re: Infinite sets., Jonathan Hoyle, 17:01
Re: (x+1)^(1/2), Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:56
Re: problem involving lipschitz condition, Michael Press, 16:55
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 16:54
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:50
Re: Making any number positive, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:50
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Michael Press, 16:47
Re: Compute the confidence interval of the standard deviation, Ray Koopman, 16:44
Re: Closure of Intergration Uses?, Jacko, 16:43
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Jonathan Hoyle, 16:39
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, Jules, 16:35
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, Math1723, 16:35
categorial crankiness and cantor, galathaea, 16:34
Re: Making any number positive, Richard Tobin, 16:32
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, benjimon05@xxxxxxxxx, 16:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 16:18
Re: Closure of Intergration Uses?, Jacko, 16:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:10
Re: tiling problem, rumpuscat, 16:08
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, David Moran, 16:00
Re: Fermat Last Theorem, jankrihau, 15:59
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 15:53
Fermat Last Theorem, benjimon05@xxxxxxxxx, 15:52
Re: tiling problem, jankrihau, 15:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 15:49
Re: Statistics Textbooks That Convey Insight?, kmbunday@xxxxxxxxx, 15:48
Re: Making any number positive, hagman, 15:47
Re: Making any number positive, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 15:44
Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, David Moran, 15:44
Re: reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 15:43
Re: tiling problem, rumpuscat, 15:42
Re: tiling problem, jankrihau, 15:41
high school textbook called mathematics in context., sean_in_cali, 15:39
Re: Statistics Textbooks That Convey Insight?, kmbunday@xxxxxxxxx, 15:38
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 15:36
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:31
Re: Rudin, jhatjabs, 15:30
Re: Infinite sets., William Hughes, 15:30
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, lugita15, 15:30
reciprocal vs inverse of trig functions, sean_in_cali, 15:29
Re: PGL(3,2), Timothy Murphy, 15:25
Re: tiling problem, jankrihau, 15:22
Re: Ordinals, Butch Malahide, 15:20
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:14
Re: Galileo's Paradox, imaginatorium, 15:14
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 15:14
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Gauster, 15:12
Queing with no Wait, jsher, 15:11
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:08
Re: Infinite sets., MoeBlee, 15:08
Re: tiling problem, rumpuscat, 15:07
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Gauster, 15:06
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., Virgil, 15:02
Re: problem involving lipschitz condition, Dick, 15:01
Re: Infinite sets., Virgil, 15:01
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 14:54
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 14:53
Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay rate-- microseconds or nanoseconds, a_plutonium, 14:53
Re: tiling problem, jankrihau, 14:52
Re: Infinite sets., Virgil, 14:50
Re: The proof of mass vector., jamesahart79, 14:50
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 14:48
Making any number positive, Michael, 14:43
Re: it is my homework help me, ediptkc, 14:42
Re: PGL(3,2), PaulHjelmstad, 14:39
Re: ask, ediptkc, 14:38
Re: ask, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:33
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 14:31
Re: it is my homework help me, Randy Poe, 14:28
tiling problem, rumpuscat, 14:21
ask, ediptkc, 14:20
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 14:16
Re: it is my homework help me, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 14:15
Re: Real analysis proof, Anolethron, 14:09
Re: Need an unusual formula for wind vectors, David T. Ashley, 14:08
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 14:08
Re: lipschitz constant, The World Wide Wade, 14:06
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 14:00
Re: lipschitz constant, G. A. Edgar, 14:00
Re: it is my homework help me, G. A. Edgar, 13:58
Re: Rudin, ArtflDodgr, 13:54
Re: it is my homework help me, junoexpress, 13:47
Compute the confidence interval of the standard deviation, Dani Camps, 13:46
Re: Infinite sets., William Hughes, 13:45
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 13:28
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 13:27
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 13:24
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 13:20
Re: Books on Stochastic Differential Equations, Dong Ta, 13:19
Re: lipschitz constant, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:19
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 13:17
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 13:16
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Jacko, 13:12
Re: lipschitz constant, Dave L. Renfro, 13:12
Re: PGL(3,2), PaulHjelmstad, 13:12
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 13:11
Re: Bessaga Klee, Chip Eastham, 13:08
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 13:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 13:07
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 13:05
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 13:02
Re: Calculating the running time of an algorithm?, Pubkeybreaker, 12:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 12:57
Re: Calculating the running time of an algorithm?, Pubkeybreaker, 12:57
it is my homework help me, ediptkc, 12:54
Re: Calculating the running time of an algorithm?, Pubkeybreaker, 12:51
lipschitz constant, novis, 12:50
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, marcus_b, 12:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tez, 12:24
Re: Calculating the running time of an algorithm?, Gabriel Cunningham, 12:23
Re: Rudin, junoexpress, 12:21
Re: Bessaga Klee, Philips, 12:18
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Arturo Magidin, 12:02
Re: number with Euler., Larry Hammick, 11:49
Re: Calculating the running time of an algorithm?, Gerard Schildberger, 11:48
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:39
Re: Calculating the running time of an algorithm?, Gabriel Cunningham, 11:37
Re: Bessaga Klee, A N Niel, 11:36
Re: Need an unusual formula for wind vectors, Chad Speer, 11:34
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Jerry Avins, 11:24
Re: Linear programme problem, Mike P, 11:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 11:21
Re: Not a Permutation? What is a "permutation" that DOES allow for repeating symbols?, kunzmilan, 11:19
Re: Differentiability of the Ruler Function, Dave L. Renfro, 11:17
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Jerry Avins, 11:15
Re: bibliography needed, Zbigniew Karno, 11:08
Re: The proof of mass vector., Randy Poe, 10:50
Re: How to multiply matrices, Randy Poe, 10:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 10:42
Re: Bessaga Klee, Philips, 10:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:21
Re: For God's sake!, Dave L. Renfro, 10:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:17
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Rick Decker, 10:11
Re: Bessaga Klee, A N Niel, 10:11
Re: Closure of Intergration Uses?, G. A. Edgar, 10:08
Re: Need an unusual formula for wind vectors, David T. Ashley, 10:06
Re: problem involving lipschitz condition, David C . Ullrich, 10:05
Re: Real analysis proof, David C . Ullrich, 10:02
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:00
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 09:57
Re: The proof of mass vector., crank_hunter, 09:56
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 09:55
Re: Sortov convergence, David C . Ullrich, 09:54
Re: PGL(3,2), PaulHjelmstad, 09:51
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 09:46
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Timothy Murphy, 09:46
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 09:45
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Taria, 09:44
Re: How to multiply matrices, kunzmilan, 09:44
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, David C . Ullrich, 09:43
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 09:43
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Daryl McCullough, 09:42
bibliography needed, Philips, 09:40
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 09:40
Re: Bessaga Klee, Philips, 09:38
Re: geometry with difficult..., Zbigniew Karno, 09:35
Re: Directed graphs: Writing the Adjacency Matrix, kunzmilan, 09:34
Re: geometry with difficult..., Zbigniew Karno, 09:32
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Taria, 09:27
Re: Bessaga Klee, Chip Eastham, 09:23
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 09:21
The conical inverse, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:20
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 09:20
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, marcus_b, 09:11
Bessaga Klee, Philips, 09:09
help, Philips, 09:06
Re: THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE, A N Niel, 08:55
Re: Spheres Inside A Cube, A N Niel, 08:52
Re: Books on Stochastic Differential Equations, A N Niel, 08:47
Re: Maths and programming languages., John Coleman, 08:34
Re: PGL(3,2), Derek Holt, 08:32
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, aatu . koskensilta, 08:24
Re: Calculating the running time of an algorithm?, eksamor, 08:22
Re: Sortov convergence, Chip Eastham, 08:19
human markov chain behaviour, paulwvanc, 08:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 08:14
online pharmacy, doroven, 08:11
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 08:09
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 08:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 08:05
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 08:02
Re: number with Euler., Larry Hammick, 08:01
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 08:00
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 07:57
Re: JSH: Short explanation, why error is so big, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 07:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 07:45
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Timothy Murphy, 07:38
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Albrecht, 07:36
Re: Calculating the running time of an algorithm?, Pubkeybreaker, 07:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:30
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Dan Dima, 07:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:15
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 07:04
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 06:57
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 06:50
Re: PGL(3,2), Lee Rudolph, 06:44
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, William Elliot, 06:42
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, The Last Danish Pastry, 06:40
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, lugita15, 06:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:29
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, lugita15, 06:28
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, lugita15, 06:28
Re: Is this an agreeable statement?, guenther vonKnakspot, 06:26
Re: number with Euler., Rupert, 06:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:19
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Timothy Murphy, 06:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:16
Re: PGL(3,2), Derek Holt, 06:16
Re: Rudin, jhatjabs, 06:15
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Julien Santini, 06:11
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 06:08
Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 06:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:02
Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Rob Johnson, 05:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:39
Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values, Taria, 05:37
Re: number with Euler., William Elliot, 05:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:28
About the Extended Euclidean Algorithm, Dani Camps, 05:25
About the Extended Euclidean Algorithm, Dani Camps, 05:24
A kind of derangements, Dan Dima, 05:24
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, William Elliot, 05:22
Re: Ordinals, William Elliot, 05:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:03
Re: Differentiability of the Ruler Function, Valeriu Anisiu, 04:56
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 04:55
Re: Linear programme problem, Mike P, 04:53
Calculating the running time of an algorithm?, eksamor, 04:52
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 04:47
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Julien Santini, 04:43
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 04:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:34
Re: Maths and programming languages., johnzulu, 04:32
Re: Opinions on mathematics., T.H. Ray, 04:30
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 04:27
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 04:22
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 04:19
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 04:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 04:10
Re: Opinions on mathematics., T.H. Ray, 04:10
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 03:58
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 03:52
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 03:52
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 03:48
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, |-|erc, 03:47
Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, William Elliot, 03:46
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 03:42
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Han de Bruijn, 03:35
number with Euler., mina_world, 03:34
Books on Stochastic Differential Equations, Dong Ta, 03:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 03:28
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 03:26
Re: Calculus Book Recommendations, Han de Bruijn, 03:20
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, William Elliot, 03:17
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Michael Press, 03:16
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 03:00
Re: Spheres Inside A Cube, Narasimham, 03:00
Re: Calculus Book Recommendations, Michael Press, 02:46
Re: A probability problem, Luis, 02:39
Re: Integral calculus: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} Exp[-1/2*(f*t/k)^2]Exp[2iPi ft] df, Badger, 02:38
Re: Is this an agreeable statement?, Michael Press, 02:23
Re: Books on Calculus, alex.lupas, 02:11
Re: Spheres Inside A Cube, Rupert, 02:08
Re: Spheres Inside A Cube, Virgil, 02:06
Re: A probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:01
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 02:01
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Ron N., 01:57
Books on Calculus, kishore, 01:54
Re: problem involving lipschitz condition, Michael Press, 01:50
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 01:25
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, |-|erc, 00:49
Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, rancid moth, 00:48
Re: lipschitz condition of order a and uniform continuity, The World Wide Wade, 00:27
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, The World Wide Wade, 00:22
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 00:16
"Topological String Theory" Unites All Interactions !!, symphony, 00:00

December 13, 2006

Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Michael Press, 23:58
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 23:47
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, fishfry, 23:43
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 23:33
Re: A neat elementary problem about fields, Saurav, 23:30
Re: Spheres Inside A Cube, Rupert, 23:19
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 23:17
Re: closed set, Rupert, 23:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 23:14
Re: Sortov convergence, rancid moth, 23:11
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Jerry Avins, 23:04
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 23:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 23:00
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Jerry Avins, 23:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:58
Re: Binomial Formula applies to this?, Taria, 22:53
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 22:52
Re: Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 22:52
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 22:52
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Tim Peters, 22:51
Re: A neat elementary problem about fields, William Elliot, 22:50
Why is Cantor a target for cranks?, david petry, 22:42
Re: Math Midget seeks help with odds, chrystalia, 22:42
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Tim Peters, 22:40
^^^^^^ High School Videos ^^$^^^^, google98.email2@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:38
closed set, novis, 22:37
Re: Math Midget seeks help with odds, chrystalia, 22:35
Re: Math Midget seeks help with odds, chrystalia, 22:32
Re: Infinite sets., Virgil, 22:22
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 22:07
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), sttscitrans, 22:00
Re: A neat elementary problem about fields, Dave Seaman, 21:59
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, junoexpress, 21:49
Re: Calculus Book Recommendations, G Patel, 21:48
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Randy Yates, 21:42
Calculus Book Recommendations, Ersalan Rahman, 21:42
Re: Rudin, junoexpress, 21:39
Re: Opinions on mathematics., David Bernier, 21:24
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Dave Rosoff, 21:24
Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, Bonk Whipple Foam, 21:18
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Michael Press, 21:08
Statistics Textbooks That Convey Insight?, Karl M. Bunday, 21:07
Re: A neat elementary problem about fields, Mike, 21:06
Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:45
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 20:38
Re: Is this an agreeable statement?, fishfry, 20:38
Re: A probability problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:36
Re: Infinite sets., Herman Rubin, 20:29
Re: Is this an agreeable statement?, DmitryKovtun, 20:26
A probability problem, Luis, 20:17
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 20:16
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Rick Decker, 20:14
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Michael Press, 20:09
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 20:02
Re: Is this an agreeable statement?, Randy Yates, 20:01
lipschitz condition of order a and uniform continuity, woodland, 19:56
Re: Sensitive Symmetry Test, Michael Press, 19:54
Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:52
Is this an agreeable statement?, paulwvanc, 19:47
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Randy Yates, 19:44
Re: Binomial Formula applies to this?, criterion2, 19:43
Re: Identify a function?, Martin Eisenberg, 19:38
Re: problem involving lipschitz condition, woodland, 19:36
Re: Binomial Formula applies to this?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:35
Re: Binomial Formula applies to this?, Gabriel Cunningham, 19:34
Re: Binomial Formula applies to this?, Chip Eastham, 19:32
Spheres Inside A Cube, Paul T., 19:30
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, marcus_b, 19:21
Binomial Formula applies to this?, Taria, 19:20
Re: problem involving lipschitz condition, Dick, 19:16
Re: PGL(3,2), Rupert, 19:08
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, David Ames, 19:06
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Ron N., 19:03
Re: Integral calculus: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} Exp[-1/2*(f*t/k)^2]Exp[2iPi ft] df, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 19:00
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, marcus_b, 18:56
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 18:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 18:42
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Julien Santini, 18:34
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), Michael Press, 18:23
Re: Infinite sets., Virgil, 18:18
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Proginoskes, 18:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 18:09
C With Really, Really Big Numbers (was: Maths and programming languages.), markwh04, 18:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:00
Re: Rudin, jhatjabs, 17:58
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Tim Peters, 17:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:51
Re: The Z_6 * Z_4 thread, Rupert, 17:49
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, James Burns, 17:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:41
Re: PGL(3,2), PaulHjelmstad, 17:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:37
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 17:33
Re: A neat elementary problem about fields, Dick, 17:28
The Z_6 * Z_4 thread, OwlHoot, 17:25
Re: Breakthroughs in New Physics Dec 12, 2006 Talk On-Line, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:24
Differentiability of the Ruler Function, Dave L. Renfro, 17:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, David R Tribble, 17:11
Re: Prolate surface area, David W . Cantrell, 17:07
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, David R Tribble, 17:02
Re: Breakthroughs in New Physics Dec 12, 2006 Talk On-Line, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:56
Re: Prolate surface area, Anonymous, 16:55
Re: divergent series ?, rancid moth, 16:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:38
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, David R Tribble, 16:35
Re: Uniform and semiregular polyhedra, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:27
Re: problem involving lipschitz condition, woodland, 16:25
Re: problem involving lipschitz condition, Ronald Bruck, 16:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:18
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 16:08
Re: Symmetric Harmonic Number & Factorial Sums, Leroy Quet, 16:08
Re: PGL(3,2), Gabriel Cunningham, 16:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:06
Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, W. Dale Hall, 16:06
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:05
Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, Butch Malahide, 16:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:00
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:57
problem involving lipschitz condition, woodland, 15:51
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), Keith Ramsay, 15:42
Re: Integral calculus: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} Exp[-1/2*(f*t/k)^2]Exp[2iPi ft] df, csimon, 15:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:39
Re: Rudin, junoexpress, 15:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:28
Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?, christian.bau, 15:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:12
Why "monotonically" increasing?, Butch Malahide, 15:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 15:04
Re: A Graph Puzzle, Butch Malahide, 15:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:55
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, marcus_b, 14:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:50
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), Tim Peters, 14:49
Re: Is this a Poisson Distribution Problem?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:41
Re: Egyptian fractions conjecture., Milo Gardner, 14:38
Re: Infinite sets., MoeBlee, 14:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:33
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 14:30
Rudin, jhatjabs, 14:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 14:25
Re: JSH: Simpler explanation important as to motive, Arturo Magidin, 14:25
projective linear group, ryang, 14:22
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 14:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 14:16
PGL(3,2), PaulHjelmstad, 14:11
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 14:10
Re: (x+1)^(1/2), Robert Israel, 14:04
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:03
Nagamine muon catalyzed fusion supports no gravity in nucleus Re: ratio of helium to hydrogen in Sun indicates gravity does not exist in the nucleus Re: Sun perhaps already provides us with the answer Re: Experiment that proves gravity does not exist in nuclear regions of atoms, a_plutonium, 14:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:00
Re: kareköklerin toplamı, erenorkun@xxxxxxxxx, 13:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 13:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 13:52
Re: Is this a Poisson Distribution Problem?, Taria, 13:50
ratio of helium to hydrogen in Sun indicates gravity does not exist in the nucleus Re: Sun perhaps already provides us with the answer Re: Experiment that proves gravity does not exist in nuclear regions of atoms, a_plutonium, 13:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 13:35
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, r!chard tchen, 13:31
Re: analysis with..;, Robert Israel, 13:23
Re: karek�klerin toplam�, Menderes ISKIN, 13:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 13:14
Re: Convex Cell Decomposition, cgiannel@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:13
Re: The Pell Equation - an alternative solution, richard miller, 13:11
Re: Need an unusual formula for wind vectors, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:10
Re: (x+1)^(1/2),düzeltme, erenorkun@xxxxxxxxx, 13:08
Re: Infinite sets., MoeBlee, 13:03
Re: Sensitive Symmetry Test, junoexpress, 12:55
(x+1)^(1/2), erenorkun@xxxxxxxxx, 12:55
Re: Integral calculus: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} Exp[-1/2*(f*t/k)^2]Exp[2iPi ft] df, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:49
Re: kareköklerin toplamý, erenorkun@xxxxxxxxx, 12:48
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., MoeBlee, 12:37
Symmetric Harmonic Number & Factorial Sums, Leroy Quet, 12:27
Re: A neat elementary problem about fields, Joshua Karstendick, 12:18
Re: kareköklerin toplamý, erenorkun@xxxxxxxxx, 12:16
Re: Statistics Textbooks That Convey Insight?, Herman Rubin, 12:12
Re: A reminder, hagen, 12:10
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Ioannis, 11:56
THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE, ACE, 11:51
Re: Convex Cell Decomposition, Lee Rudolph, 11:50
Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 11:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 11:36
Real analysis proof, Anolethron, 11:34
Convex Cell Decomposition, cgiannel@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:30
Re: A Graph Puzzle, Joshua Karstendick, 11:23
Re: A Graph Puzzle, Steven Woody, 11:21
Re: Is this a Poisson Distribution Problem?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:12
Re: Is this a Poisson Distribution Problem?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:04
Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 11:03
Re: Closure of Intergration Uses?, Jacko, 11:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:59
Re: Sortov convergence, David M Einstein, 10:58
Re: A Graph Puzzle, Jules, 10:56
Uniform and semiregular polyhedra, Rich Holmes, 10:38
A neat elementary problem about fields, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 10:38
A Graph Puzzle, Steven Woody, 10:27
Re: Linear programme problem, Randy Poe, 10:25
Re: The Pell Equation - an alternative solution, fasttrack2a, 10:20
Re: Sortov convergence, David M Einstein, 10:14
Re: C++ routine for complex Gamma Function, loic-dev, 10:11
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Hero, 10:01
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Julien Santini, 09:53
Re: Sortov convergence, Chip Eastham, 09:40
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Alois Steindl, 09:39
Re: fredholm, llp_shop04, 09:38
Re: Hints request, llp_shop04, 09:36
Re: Viadeo : a business connection Website, llp_shop04, 09:36
Re: Linear programme problem, llp_shop04, 09:36
Re: Integral calculus: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} Exp[-1/2*(f*t/k)^2]Exp[2iPi ft] df, llp_shop04, 09:36
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Julien Santini, 09:35
Re: C++ routine for complex Gamma Function, llp_shop04, 09:35
Re: calculating the distribution, the percentage chance for a number of streaks of a certain length in a sample, gamesburn, 09:33
C++ routine for complex Gamma Function, Tina, 09:21
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Stephen Weimar, 09:16
Hints request, Rados�aw Hofman, 08:43
Viadeo : a business connection Website, Folley, 08:37
Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 08:24
Re: Linear programme problem, Mike P, 08:18
Re: Sortov convergence, David C . Ullrich, 08:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 08:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 07:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 07:54
Re: Linear programme problem, Randy Poe, 07:53
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, A N Niel, 07:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 07:45
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), sttscitrans, 07:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 07:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 07:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 07:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:30
Re: The Pell Equation - an alternative solution, richard miller, 07:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:25
Re: Linear programme problem, Mike P, 07:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:18
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Randy Yates, 07:07
Re: Linear programme problem, Randy Poe, 07:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:04
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:57
Re: Is this a Poisson Distribution Problem?, Amateur, 06:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:52
Re: Infinite sets., Jesse F. Hughes, 06:49
Re: Is this a Poisson Distribution Problem?, Nick, 06:37
Re: inequality of complex numbers, Kamjah Kogumah, 06:26
Linear programme problem, Mike P, 06:23
Re: 4x4 matrices using Cramer's Rule, Han de Bruijn, 06:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:00
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Larry Hammick, 05:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:55
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, William Elliot, 05:51
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Giovanni Resta, 05:38
Integral calculus: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} Exp[-1/2*(f*t/k)^2]Exp[2iPi ft] df, csimon, 04:59
Re: inequality of complex numbers, Larry Hammick, 04:21
Re: Finding Minimal Poly of a possible algebraic number?, titus_piezas, 03:54
Re: Is this a Poisson Distribution Problem?, Taria, 03:52
Re: The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Tonico, 03:51
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), Larry Hammick, 03:48
Re: Functional derivative question - typo corrected version, Michael, 03:40
Re: Is this a Poisson Distribution Problem?, Taria, 03:28
fredholm, Philips, 03:23
Re: Is this a Poisson Distribution Problem?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 03:13
Re: 4x4 matrices using Cramer's Rule, G Patel, 03:10
cosmic abundance of isotopes tells us that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms Re: Experiment that proves gravity does not exist in nuclear regions of atoms, a_plutonium, 03:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 02:55
Re: Finding Minimal Poly of a possible algebraic number?, Han de Bruijn, 02:42
Re: Linear system is degenerate, Ulysse from CH, 02:41
Re: Linear system is degenerate, Ulysse from CH, 02:37
Re: Is this a Poisson Distribution Problem?, junoexpress, 02:34
Re: Is this a Poisson Distribution Problem?, junoexpress, 02:32
Re: Experiment that proves gravity does not exist in nuclear regions of atoms Re: adding on and correcting Feynman's page 2-10 Lectures On Physics Re: when we assume Space as the monopole then Coulomb force equals StrongNuclear force Re: Dirac's page 46 Directions in Physics and why it is important to have the existence of monopoles, a_plutonium, 02:20
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 02:20
Re: Need an unusual formula for wind vectors, Chad Speer, 02:14
Re: Hilbert space question, Ulysse from CH, 02:12
sudoku solver api challenge, spackest, 02:06
Re: A problem realted with cyclotomic polynomial!, Rupert, 01:55
Is this a Poisson Distribution Problem?, Taria, 01:46
The Math Forum from Drexel University wants me to modify my website, Julien Santini, 01:26
Re: Infinite sets., Andrew Usher, 01:16
Re: Finding Minimal Poly of a possible algebraic number?, Gerry, 01:06
Re: Infinite sets., Jonathan Hoyle, 00:41
Re: Infinite sets., Saurav, 00:23
Re: Infinite sets., Saurav, 00:22
Re: Plutonium-239 in nature, Andrew Usher, 00:06
Re: Infinite sets., Rupert, 00:03
Re: Hilbert space question, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:00

December 12, 2006

Re: divergent series ?, rancid moth, 23:55
circular infinity, Eep�, 23:45
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), Tim Peters, 23:44
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 23:43
Re: Why isn't (n C r1) * (n C r2) / (n C (r1 + r2)) == P(r1) * P(r2)?, dave_and_darla, 23:31
Re: Statistics Textbooks That Convey Insight?, junoexpress, 23:27
Statistics Textbooks That Convey Insight?, Karl M. Bunday, 23:21
Re: Chaos and Time Series Analysis, Michael Press, 23:20
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 23:15
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), sttscitrans, 23:05
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Andrew Usher, 23:00
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 22:50
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 22:46
Sensitive Symmetry Test, junoexpress, 22:35
Re: Why isn't (n C r1) * (n C r2) / (n C (r1 + r2)) == P(r1) * P(r2)?, Gabriel Cunningham, 22:20
Re: karek�klerin toplam�, David W . Cantrell, 22:20
Re: Opinions on mathematics., cbrown, 22:18
Re: For God's sake!, Andrew Usher, 22:18
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Andrew Usher, 22:13
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Andrew Usher, 22:10
Re: Infinite sets., Rupert, 22:08
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 22:02
A problem realted with cyclotomic polynomial!, Gary Cooper, 22:02
Re: Infinite sets., Jonathan Hoyle, 21:58
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), kilian heckrodt, 21:55
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 21:51
Why isn't (n C r1) * (n C r2) / (n C (r1 + r2)) == P(r1) * P(r2)?, trompelamort, 21:51
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 21:46
Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms., zuhair, 21:42
Re: JSH: Short explanation, why error is so big, Jesse F. Hughes, 21:38
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 21:29
Re: divergent series ?, The World Wide Wade, 21:24
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), Tim Peters, 21:23
Re: Infinite sets., Rupert, 21:22
construction of self mapping, novis, 21:14
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 21:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:52
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), sttscitrans, 20:45
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Ioannis, 20:40
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:39
Re: The proof of mass vector., Virgil, 20:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:32
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, DmitryKovtun, 19:50
Re: JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, DmitryKovtun, 19:48
Re: What does a math instructor have to do to get some attention around here?, Michael Press, 19:45
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:42
Re: Why is arithmetic mean being used in calculating standard deviation!? Why not some thing else!?, Nick, 19:38
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, T.H. Ray, 19:36
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, sg552, 19:29
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:27
Re: Death of the Net Predicted! (was: JSH: One mystery remains), litsohate, 19:24
Re: divergent series ?, rancid moth, 19:20
Re: Egyptian fractions conjecture., Michael Press, 19:16
Re: inequality of complex numbers, Virgil, 19:04
Re: Infinite sets., Virgil, 19:01
Re: Why is arithmetic mean being used in calculating standard deviation!? Why not some thing else!?, Ray Koopman, 18:58
Re: Why is arithmetic mean being used in calculating standard deviation!? Why not some thing else!?, James, 18:58
Re: A special case of Polya's urn?, James, 18:53
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 18:53
Re: inequality of complex numbers, Jules, 18:50
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 18:45
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 18:43
Re: calculating the distribution, the percentage chance for a number of streaks of a certain length in a sample, matt271829-news, 18:41
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 18:39
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Michael Press, 18:36
Re: karek�klerin toplam�, Menderes ISKIN, 18:35
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Michael Press, 18:30
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, The Last Danish Pastry, 18:23
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 18:13
Re: How to write a formal desciprion, m7ossny, 18:11
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, T.H. Ray, 18:04
Re: What does a math instructor have to do to get some attention around here?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 17:37
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, T.H. Ray, 17:37
Re: Why is arithmetic mean being used in calculating standard deviation!? Why not some thing else!?, mathman, 17:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 17:16
Re: JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, Michael Press, 17:15
Re: What does a math instructor have to do to get some attention around here?, Proginoskes, 16:59
Re: Infinite sets., Jonathan Hoyle, 16:54
Complex associative sequential number assignment........., {Greenster}, 16:54
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 16:44
Re: Infinite sets., Rupert, 16:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 16:39
The Pell Equation - an alternative solution, richard miller, 16:39
Re: Jech's Set Theory, MoeBlee, 16:38
Re: Sets as mathematical objects, Charles Wells, 16:32
Re: Probability Question, junoexpress, 16:32
Re: Galileo's Paradox, stephen, 16:32
Re: Radius of convergence--, JEMebius, 16:30
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), hank, 16:24
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:22
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 16:19
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 16:15
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:15
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), hank, 16:13
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:12
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 16:12
Re: What does a math instructor have to do to get some attention around here?, junoexpress, 16:11
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:10
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 16:10
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:10
Re: Radius of convergence-, JEMebius, 16:07
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), Larry Hammick, 16:07
Re: JSH: End of an error, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:00
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:56
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 15:54
Re: inequality of complex numbers, Larry Hammick, 15:54
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:52
Re: finite rank operator, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 15:51
Re: Chaos and Time Series Analysis, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:51
Re: Hilbert space question, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 15:50
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:50
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:48
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:47
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 15:46
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:45
Re: hi hi hi hi, John, 15:43
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 15:43
Sun perhaps already provides us with the answer Re: Experiment that proves gravity does not exist in nuclear regions of atoms, a_plutonium, 15:42
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:40
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:38
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:33
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, galathaea, 15:32
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:31
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:28
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tonico, 15:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:16
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tonico, 15:14
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), hank, 15:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:06
Re: Experiment that proves gravity does not exist in nuclear regions of atoms Re: adding on and correcting Feynman's page 2-10 Lectures On Physics Re: when we assume Space as the monopole then Coulomb force equals StrongNuclear force Re: Dirac's page 46 Directions in Physics and why it is important to have the existence of monopoles, Phineas T Puddleduck, 15:02
Re: Closure of Intergration Uses?, Jacko, 15:00
Experiment that proves gravity does not exist in nuclear regions of atoms Re: adding on and correcting Feynman's page 2-10 Lectures On Physics Re: when we assume Space as the monopole then Coulomb force equals StrongNuclear force Re: Dirac's page 46 Directions in Physics and why it is important to have the existence of monopoles, a_plutonium, 14:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:47
hi hi hi hi, jhon, 14:43
Re: Closure of Intergration Uses?, G. A. Edgar, 14:42
adding on and correcting Feynman's page 2-10 Lectures On Physics Re: when we assume Space as the monopole then Coulomb force equals StrongNuclear force Re: Dirac's page 46 Directions in Physics and why it is important to have the existence of monopoles, a_plutonium, 14:40
Re: Maths and programming languages., Marc Olschok, 14:40
Chaos and Time Series Analysis, mercialago, 14:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:36
Re: Infinite sets., William Hughes, 14:33
Re: Galileo's Paradox, cbrown, 14:32
Re: kareköklerin toplamý, erenorkun@xxxxxxxxx, 14:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:27
Re: What does a math instructor have to do to get some attention around here?, Neil W Rickert, 14:27
Re: Infinite sets., William Hughes, 14:27
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, marcus_b, 14:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:23
Re: JSH: Short explanation, why error is so big, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:22
Re: Ordinals, Butch Malahide, 14:20
Re: Galileo's Paradox, cbrown, 14:19
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 14:14
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), hank, 14:12
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 14:10
Re: How to calculate log mean standard deviation of two numbers?, Karthik, 14:10
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 14:09
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 14:04
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 13:59
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 13:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:58
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), Tim Peters, 13:57
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 13:56
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Michael Press, 13:53
Re: simple GCD question (but has me foxed), kilian heckrodt, 13:50
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 13:50
Re: alt.math.recreational, alt.math, sci.math, Michael Stemper, 13:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:41
How to calculate log mean standard deviation of two numbers?, Karthik, 13:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 13:37
Re: alt.math.recreational, alt.math, sci.math, Michael Stemper, 13:36
simple GCD question (but has me foxed), hank, 13:32
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 13:31
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 13:27
Linear system is degenerate, giap882002, 13:21
Closure of Intergration Uses?, Jacko, 13:18
Re: Infinite sets., zuhair, 13:12
Re: What does a math instructor have to do to get some attention around here?, Herman Rubin, 13:09
Re: Maths and programming languages., Herman Rubin, 13:02
Re: What does a math instructor have to do to get some attention around here?, Herman Rubin, 12:51
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 12:35
Re: Probability Question, Herman Rubin, 12:35
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 12:33
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, marcus_b, 12:19
Re: kareköklerin toplamý, erenorkun@xxxxxxxxx, 12:04
finite rank operator, Philips, 11:53
Re: Egyptian fractions conjecture., Milo Gardner, 11:49
Re: Infinite sets., boxgirlhunny, 11:43
Re: Hilbert space question, bobm2005, 11:23
Re: Hilbert space question, Daniel Grubb, 11:20
Re: Hilbert space question, Volker Boie, 11:14
Re: analysis with..;, Hero, 11:14
Bezier Curve Regression, harut, 11:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Tony Orlow, 11:03
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 10:54
A Question about von Neumann Regular Rings, Cao, 10:53
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Richard Tobin, 10:53
Hilbert space question, James, 10:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Tony Orlow, 10:49
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 10:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Tony Orlow, 10:43
Re: Infinite sets., Jonathan Hoyle, 10:36
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 10:25
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 10:14
Re: calculating the distribution, the percentage chance for a number of streaks of a certain length in a sample, matt271829-news, 10:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 10:05
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 10:00
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 09:58
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 09:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 09:56
Re: For God's sake!, Dave L. Renfro, 09:54
Re: analysis with..;, José Carlos Santos, 09:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 09:46
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Mitch, 09:39
Re: Infinite sets., Jesse F. Hughes, 09:35
Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 09:35
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 09:24
Re: Infinite sets., William Hughes, 09:17
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 09:08
Re: Calculating the volatility of a non-linear time series (tick data), Beliavsky, 09:04
Re: What does a math instructor have to do to get some attention around here?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 09:00
Re: Sortov convergence, Chip Eastham, 08:58
Re: Sortov convergence, Chip Eastham, 08:51
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 08:50
Inside the Black Box, MDM Senior, 08:48
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 08:47
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 08:43
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 08:41
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 08:38
Re: Ordinals, mina_world, 08:32
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 08:31
Re: Infinite sets., Jesse F. Hughes, 08:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:26
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 08:23
Calculating the volatility of a non-linear time series (tick data), Chris, 08:22
Re: Plutonium-239 in nature, Richard Schultz, 08:20
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 08:20
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, jankrihau, 08:13
analysis with..;, mina_world, 08:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:09
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 08:07
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 08:02
Re: Sets of quaternions with no repeats... (OT for aue), Peter Duncanson, 07:49
Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 07:34
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:31
Re: What does a math instructor have to do to get some attention around here?, oar, 07:30
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, David Moran, 07:26
Re: Probability Question, Dave Seaman, 07:25
Re: Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 07:22
Re: Functional derivative question - typo corrected version, David C . Ullrich, 07:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:17
Re: Sortov convergence, David C . Ullrich, 07:09
Re: Infinity......, William Hughes, 07:09
Re: Infinite sets., David C . Ullrich, 07:04
Re: flat function, David C . Ullrich, 07:02
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:38
Re: Maths and programming languages., Jaap Spies, 06:19
Re: Ordinals, William Elliot, 06:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:50
Re: Infinite sets., Bob Kolker, 05:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:45
edvard munch edvard munch edvard munch edvard munch 0021275831620, sofiane, 05:37
Functional derivative question - typo corrected version, Michael, 05:30
Functional derivative question, Michael, 05:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:22
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Mike Kelly, 05:10
Re: How to write a formal desciprion, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 05:07
Ordinals, William Elliot, 04:59
Re: What does a math instructor have to do to get some attention around here?, William Elliot, 04:52
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Tim Peters, 04:39
Sortov convergence, Larry Hammick, 04:29
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Tim Peters, 04:23
Breakthroughs in New Physics Dec 12, 2006 Talk On-Line, Jack Sarfatti, 03:44
Re: Bridge hands and probabilitiy, اوفر, 03:41
Re: 4x4 matrices using Cramer's Rule, Han de Bruijn, 03:07
Re: Fourier transform and oscillation amplitude, Pygmalion, 02:56
when we assume Space as the monopole then Coulomb force equals StrongNuclear force Re: Dirac's page 46 Directions in Physics and why it is important to have the existence of monopoles, a_plutonium, 02:28
Re: Infinite sets., fishfry, 02:09
Re: Probability Question, junoexpress, 01:57
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Proginoskes, 01:54
Re: God's IQ, Bob Cain, 01:52
What does a math instructor have to do to get some attention around here?, junoexpress, 01:51
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Rupert, 01:51
Re: Infinite sets., Rupert, 01:48
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 01:39
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 01:38
Re: Probability Question, falldierise, 01:33
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 01:31
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 01:30
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 01:28
Re: Bridge hands and probabilitiy, Bill Hale, 01:25
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 01:23
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 01:21
Why is arithmetic mean being used in calculating standard deviation!? Why not some thing else!?, m7ossny, 01:20
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, jstevh, 01:20
Re: Bridge hands and probabilitiy, junoexpress, 01:17
Re: Infinite sets., Virgil, 01:12
Re: How to write a formal desciprion, m7ossny, 01:11
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Gauster, 01:07
Re: Probability Question, junoexpress, 01:07
Re: Finding Minimal Poly of a possible algebraic number?, titus_piezas, 01:00
Re: Infinity......, zuhair, 00:50
Infinite sets., zuhair, 00:46
Re: Egyptian fractions conjecture., Bill Taylor, 00:37
Re: Infinity......, William Hughes, 00:36
Bridge hands and probabilitiy, Taria, 00:33
Probability Question, falldierise, 00:22
Re: Galileo's Paradox, stephen, 00:21
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, Tim Peters, 00:21
Re: flat function, novis, 00:07
Re: Galileo's Paradox, cbrown, 00:05

December 11, 2006

Re: Infinity......, zuhair, 23:35
Re: Galileo's Paradox, cbrown, 23:08
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, marcus_b, 23:05
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:58
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:53
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Tim Peters, 22:53
Re: Infinity......, William Hughes, 22:50
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:49
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:47
Re: Galileo's Paradox, cbrown, 22:46
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:37
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:33
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:30
Re: Sets of quaternions with no repeats... (OT for aue), cbrown, 22:22
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:20
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:16
Re: Maths and programming languages., johnzulu, 22:14
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 22:05
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:04
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:52
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:47
Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 21:46
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:45
Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 21:42
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, DOD, 21:39
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, Rupert, 21:38
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Rupert, 21:36
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:35
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:30
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:30
Re: Hadamard product(schur product), Herman Rubin, 21:29
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, Richard Tobin, 21:28
Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., cbrown, 21:26
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 21:23
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, jshsucks, 21:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:21
Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 21:20
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 21:19
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, jshsucks, 21:18
Re: Opinions on mathematics., galathaea, 21:17
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 21:12
Re: divergent series ?, The World Wide Wade, 21:11
Re: Galileo's Paradox, cbrown, 21:10
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 21:09
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, Jesse F. Hughes, 21:08
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, Rupert, 21:08
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Bob Kolker, 21:05
Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 21:04
Re: JSH: One mystery remains, jstevh, 21:03
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Bob Kolker, 21:02
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, gjedwards, 21:00
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 20:57
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, jshsucks, 20:56
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Aatu Koskensilta, 20:53
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, Proginoskes, 20:52
Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 20:49
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, jstevh, 20:47
Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 20:46
Re: Infinity......, zuhair, 20:44
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Mitch, 20:41
Re: Galileo's Paradox, stephen, 20:40
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 20:38
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 20:35
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 20:32
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, Dave Rosoff, 20:26
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 20:25
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 20:22
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 20:22
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, MoeBlee, 20:21
Re: flat function, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 20:20
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 20:19
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 20:18
Re: Infinity......, William Hughes, 20:16
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 20:15
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 20:12
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 20:05
Re: Integer Triangle, Deep, 20:02
Re: A diofantine equation, sttscitrans, 20:01
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, Richard Tobin, 19:50
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Ioannis, 19:49
Re: JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, Tim Peters, 19:49
Re: Galileo's Paradox, David R Tribble, 19:47
Re: Prob. Quesiton, John, 19:46
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, David R Tribble, 19:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 19:30
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 19:28
Re: Galileo's Paradox, cbrown, 19:28
Re: Radius of convergence, rancid moth, 19:27
Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., Rupert, 19:26
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 19:23
Re: The proof of mass vector., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:21
Re: The proof of mass vector., yen, ka-in, 19:19
Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted., zuhair, 19:16
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 19:15
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 19:14
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Mike Kelly, 19:09
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 19:09
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 19:02
Re: calculating the distribution, the percentage chance for a number of streaks of a certain length in a sample, gamesburn, 19:02
Re: ? how subspaces are like, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 19:01
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Tony Orlow, 19:00
Re: Jech's Set Theory, MoeBlee, 18:51
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 18:48
Re: JSH: Why would they tell the truth?, litsohate, 18:46
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 18:46
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 18:45
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 18:44
Re: Infinity......, zuhair, 18:44
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 18:35
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Michael Press, 18:34
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, marcus_b, 18:33
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 18:31
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Michael Press, 18:29
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 18:28
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 18:27
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 18:18
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Ron N., 18:18
Re: det(A+B), Robert Israel, 18:16
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Michael Press, 18:16
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 18:10
Re: Opinions on mathematics., Michael Press, 18:08
Re: linear maps, Robert Israel, 18:01
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Proginoskes, 17:56
Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial, Proginoskes, 17:51
Re: flat function, David C . Ullrich, 17:49
Re: 4x4 matrices using Cramer's Rule, Virgil, 17:49
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), paulwvanc, 17:47
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Ron N., 17:46
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 17:45
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 17:38
Re: Verhoeff algorithm, Proginoskes, 17:38
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 17:31
Re: inequality of complex numbers, David C . Ullrich, 17:29
Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?, Virgil, 17:29
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discrete Fourier transform), Randy Yates, 17:29
Re: flat function, Chris Smith, 17:28
Re: is this what people usually do? (about Discr