sci.math (date)

sci.math (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

November 30, 2006

Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:19
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:17
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:14
Re: Continuous functions bounded implies compact?, Butch Malahide, 16:11
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:09
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:09
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:02
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:00
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 15:56
problem with sum function, Andro, 15:53
Re: interpolation/approximation functions, Richard Harter, 15:47
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:46
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:44
Re: Generational sizes., Jesse F. Hughes, 15:40
Re: eigenpairs for matrix powers, Randy Yates, 15:33
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:29
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:29
Re: Is most of Euclid I necessary for Euclid I.47 (Pythagorean Theorem)?, avital, 15:26
Re: Simple way to multiply big numbers (video), Larry Hammick, 15:26
Re: Is most of Euclid I necessary for Euclid I.47 (Pythagorean Theorem)?, avital, 15:25
Re: Is most of Euclid I necessary for Euclid I.47 (Pythagorean Theorem)?, avital, 15:16
Re: vector fields and coordinate transforms, Pouya D. Tafti, 15:12
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 15:12
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 15:10
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:09
Re: Generational sizes., MoeBlee, 15:07
Re: Is most of Euclid I necessary for Euclid I.47 (Pythagorean Theorem)?, junoexpress, 14:56
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 14:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown, 14:51
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 14:50
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tonico, 14:46
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tonico, 14:46
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 14:45
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 14:39
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 14:39
Re: Generational sizes., Tony Orlow, 14:37
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, John Coleman, 14:37
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Nick, 14:37
Recurrent Equation, Luis, 14:33
Re: Is most of Euclid I necessary for Euclid I.47 (Pythagorean Theorem)?, Robert Israel, 14:33
help deriving formula for stock-price, dh003i, 14:31
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Narasimham, 14:29
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 14:27
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 14:24
Re: Binary Division Problem Help, The Last Danish Pastry, 14:22
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Narasimham, 14:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:53
Re: Lambert W solution?, Robert Israel, 13:49
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, marcus_b, 13:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:38
Re: Lebesgue measure of a curve, Dave L. Renfro, 13:29
Binary Division Problem Help, jamestuck21, 13:26
Re: Lambert W solution?, mas6zd, 13:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:23
Re: eigenpairs for matrix powers, Robert Israel, 13:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:12
Re: Axiom of choice and the three spheres., Dave L. Renfro, 13:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:04
Re: Is most of Euclid I necessary for Euclid I.47 (Pythagorean Theorem)?, M.J.T. Guy, 13:03
Re: Closed form for a PDE?, Robert Israel, 12:58
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 12:58
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 12:58
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 12:58
Re: Continuous functions bounded implies compact?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:55
Re: Galileo's Paradox, stephen, 12:44
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 12:39
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 12:25
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 12:20
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 12:19
Re: Axiom of choice and the three spheres., John Coleman, 12:09
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 12:04
Re: eigenpairs for matrix powers, Dick, 11:48
Re: computers of future having a "science key" to write science fluently, wallacek, 11:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 11:38
Re: ? nilpotent, José Carlos Santos, 11:21
Re: Is an invariant measure a statistical distribution, G. A. Edgar, 11:21
any difference between a conditional Fubini theorem vs. a normal Fubini theorem?, Mike, 11:19
Re: interpolation/approximation functions, dcorbit, 11:19
Re: isomorphic subgroups of a finite group, Derek Holt, 11:19
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 11:15
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 11:13
Re: Volume of finite body, Cristee, 11:13
Re: ? nilpotent, Derek Holt, 11:13
Re: vector fields and coordinate transforms, lapiz, 10:48
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:40
Is an invariant measure a statistical distribution, Paul Smith, 10:24
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 10:09
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 10:05
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 09:46
Re: ? nilpotent, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 09:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 09:28
Re: A Rudin's approach, TCL, 09:26
Re: ? nilpotent, Derek Holt, 09:17
Re: ? nilpotent, Derek Holt, 09:17
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:10
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:59
Re: Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), Badger, 08:58
Re: ? nilpotent, Arturo Magidin, 08:55
Re: Baby stat question, Bart Goddard, 08:50
Re: Baby stat question, Bart Goddard, 08:43
Re: ? nilpotent, Tonico, 08:41
Re: Is most of Euclid I necessary for Euclid I.47 (Pythagorean Theorem)?, avital, 08:40
Problem of the Week 2, Julien Santini, 08:35
Re: ? nilpotent, Arturo Magidin, 08:33
Re: virgil crankheit, Eckard Blumschein, 08:31
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 08:27
Calculating mixed high-order derivatives, Finder, 08:25
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 08:25
Simple way to multiply big numbers (video), Xadai, 08:18
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:18
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:12
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, tjb, 08:09
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:56
Re: Axiom of choice and the three spheres., David C . Ullrich, 07:55
Re: Lebesgue measure of a curve, David C . Ullrich, 07:47
Re: Lebesgue measure of a curve, A N Niel, 07:46
Re: Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), David C . Ullrich, 07:43
Re: Is most of Euclid I necessary for Euclid I.47 (Pythagorean Theorem)?, G. A. Edgar, 07:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 07:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 07:38
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:36
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 07:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 07:32
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 07:32
Re: ? nilpotent, Tonico, 07:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:22
Is most of Euclid I necessary for Euclid I.47 (Pythagorean Theorem)?, avital, 07:18
Re: ? nilpotent, José Carlos Santos, 07:18
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:17
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 07:09
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:01
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tonico, 07:00
Re: infinite product, Gottfried Helms, 06:29
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 06:11
Re: infinite product, Gottfried Helms, 06:10
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 06:08
Re: Continuous functiions bounded implies compact?, Butch Malahide, 05:53
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 05:41
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 05:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 05:20
Re: "Vector spaces have bases" implies AC?, William Elliot, 05:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 05:09
Re: Continuous functiions bounded implies compact?, William Elliot, 05:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 04:45
Continuous functiions bounded implies compact?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 04:42
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 04:40
"Vector spaces have bases" implies AC?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 04:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:38
New Trends in Physics, vlcek, 04:32
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 04:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:10
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 04:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:05
Re: puzzle. 1/n contains ooo in period??, Richard Sabey, 04:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:01
Re: Axiom of choice and the three spheres., Michael Press, 04:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 03:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 03:53
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 03:52
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 03:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 03:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 03:48
Re: Baby stat question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 03:46
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 03:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 03:44
Vlcek - EINSTEIN comparison, vlcek, 03:42
Re: Generational sizes., zuhair, 03:38
Half integer Chebyshev solutions, Han de Bruijn, 03:35
Minute Set Theory., zuhair, 03:33
Re: The class of transitive sets., zuhair, 03:21
Re: generalized product rule, The World Wide Wade, 03:17
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, imaginatorium, 03:08
Re: ? nilpotent, Virgil, 02:48
Re: Axiom of choice and the three spheres., Phil Carmody, 02:46
Re: vector addition and minimizing the angle of resultant vector with x-axis, john, 02:46
Re: hint on derivative problem, Proginoskes, 02:26
Re: generalized product rule, Proginoskes, 02:20
Re: Lambert W solution?, Proginoskes, 02:12
Re: integral of exp(-x^2) from 0 to infinity, Menderes ISKIN, 02:12
Re: double integral of exp^max(b^2 x^2, a^2 y^2) dy dx, Proginoskes, 02:11
Super size, PiN!O, 01:22
Re: ? nilpotent, Tonico, 01:19
Re: Axiom of choice and the three spheres., Tonico, 01:18
Re: Bilinear form and non-degeneracy question, Robert Israel, 01:13
? nilpotent, Cheng Cosine, 01:13
Adaptive euler heun method for soliving a diff eqn, smart0072000in, 01:03
Re: puzzle. 1/n contains ooo in period??, James Dow Allen, 00:54
Re: Unimodality of Dirichlet distribution, Jamaica R., 00:45
Re: Axiom of choice and the three spheres., Virgil, 00:40
Re: solution to a "complex" equation...., Virgil, 00:33
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 00:25
hint on derivative problem, jraul, 00:21
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 00:20
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 00:15
Re: Axiom of choice and the three spheres., Bill Taylor, 00:00

November 29, 2006

solution to a "complex" equation...., dh003i, 23:55
generalized product rule, jraul, 23:47
Re: puzzle. 1/n contains ooo in period??, Mark Brader, 23:33
Generational sizes., zuhair, 23:33
eigenpairs for matrix powers, Randy Yates, 23:19
Re: Axiom of choice and the three spheres., Gerry Myerson, 23:18
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, rich burge, 23:11
Re: Hom(V,V), linear algebra, and dual space question, Maximilian von Krank, 23:07
Re: Lebesgue measure of a curve, The World Wide Wade, 22:54
Re: Galileo's Paradox, zuhair, 22:41
Re: Four variable Diophine equations, sttscitrans, 22:32
Re: Introduction to Data Analysis, muraii, 22:30
decimal expansion of 1/n contains string 000 in period?? integer sequences., don . lotto, 22:27
puzzle. 1/n contains ooo in period??, don . lotto, 22:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:54
Re: Four variable Diophine equations, CH, 21:52
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 21:52
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 21:49
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 21:47
Four variable Diophine equations, CH, 21:45
Re: integral of exp(-x^2) from 0 to infinity, Virgil, 21:38
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Gerry Myerson, 21:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 21:29
Breakdown of unitarity of the S-Matrix in complex open systems, Jack Sarfatti, 21:26
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:22
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:19
Re: Axiom of choice and the three spheres., fishfry, 21:16
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, Jonathan Hoyle, 20:50
Axiom of choice and the three spheres., Michael Press, 20:49
Re: Lebesgue measure of a curve, NiceProbabilist, 20:43
Re: ugly limit help -- trinomial distn, The World Wide Wade, 20:07
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 19:51
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 19:51
Re: Concavity of the quotient of a monotone and of a convex function?, The World Wide Wade, 19:37
double integral of exp^max(b^2 x^2, a^2 y^2) dy dx, bottomline, 19:14
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:11
Re: general ratio test, rancid moth, 19:05
Re: Closed form for a PDE?, hmobahi, 19:03
Re: Closed form for a PDE?, hmobahi, 19:00
Closed form for a PDE?, hmobahi, 18:56
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Rupert, 18:46
Re: general ratio test, rancid moth, 18:44
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 18:38
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, dl, 18:30
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 18:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:28
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Nick, 18:26
ugly limit help -- trinomial distn, Earl, 18:17
Lambert W solution?, mas6zd, 18:15
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Nick, 18:14
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 18:13
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 18:11
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Nick, 18:11
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 18:10
Bilinear form, non-degenerate, question, greenthorn, 18:04
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Phil Carmody, 18:00
Re: Introduction to Data Analysis, marcus_b, 17:53
Bilinear form and non-degeneracy question, James, 17:46
Re: discrete math with difficult party., bill, 17:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 17:35
Re: Weighted graph partitioning, Proginoskes, 17:32
Re: Introduction to Data Analysis, muraii, 17:22
Re: Introduction to Data Analysis, Randy Poe, 17:11
Re: Concavity of the quotient of a monotone and of a convex function?, The World Wide Wade, 17:10
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, Randy Poe, 17:06
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 16:53
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 16:52
Introduction to Data Analysis, muraii, 16:45
Re: general ratio test, The World Wide Wade, 16:43
Re: The class of transitive sets., Rupert, 16:41
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, MoeBlee, 16:34
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 16:25
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, Mike Kelly, 16:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:21
Re: integral of exp(-x^2) from 0 to infinity, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:19
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 16:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:12
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:10
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 16:07
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:04
Re: The class of transitive sets., zuhair, 16:04
Re: Circumcircle testing in Barycentric Coordinates, dang2015, 16:02
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:02
Re: Concavity of the quotient of a monotone and of a convex function?, Robert Israel, 15:56
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., zuhair, 15:52
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, galathaea, 15:48
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, tjb, 15:32
Re: roots in Z/pZ hence reducible ?, Fedor, 15:22
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, galathaea, 15:14
Re: Volume of finite body, The Qurqirish Dragon, 15:01
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 15:00
virgil crankheit, galathaea, 14:58
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 14:54
Concavity of the quotient of a monotone and of a convex function?, maggda0, 14:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 14:53
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 14:51
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 14:50
Re: Lebesgue measure of a curve, Dave L. Renfro, 14:45
Re: vector fields and coordinate transforms, Pouya D. Tafti, 14:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 14:40
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 14:38
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 14:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 14:33
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 14:32
Re: Lebesgue measure of a curve, A N Niel, 14:29
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 14:28
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 14:25
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 14:24
interpolation/approximation functions, cb135, 14:23
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 14:21
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 14:19
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 14:18
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 14:18
Lebesgue measure of a curve, NiceProbabilist, 14:16
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 14:15
Re: Galileo's Paradox, MoeBlee, 14:14
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 14:13
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 14:13
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 14:12
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 14:11
Re: Problems on Extremal Principle ?, Larry Hammick, 14:11
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 14:09
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, Arturo Magidin, 14:08
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 14:06
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 14:03
Re: Baby stat question, marcus_b, 13:59
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 13:59
Hom(V,V), linear algebra, and dual space question, greenthorn, 13:58
Re: standard terminology regarding sequences? (help!), Virgil, 13:55
Re: integral of exp(-x^2) from 0 to infinity, Badger, 13:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:47
minor correction on Dirac's page 45 to get the Gauss Law of magnetism, a_plutonium, 13:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:41
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 13:40
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, eugene, 13:38
Re: integral of exp(-x^2) from 0 to infinity, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:38
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 13:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:34
Re: Baby stat question, Bart Goddard, 13:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:26
integral of exp(-x^2) from 0 to infinity, Kobu, 13:24
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 13:21
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 13:19
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 13:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:17
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 13:16
Re: Baby stat question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:12
Re: Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), royend, 13:10
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 13:06
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Lester Zick, 13:04
Gap: conversion from int to char, siwy_PL, 13:03
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 13:00
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, Randy Poe, 12:58
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 12:55
Re: idempotent functions, Robert Sheskey, 12:55
Re: How many chess games are there?...and who wins?, Rob Pratt, 12:53
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, MoeBlee, 12:45
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 12:37
Re: vector fields and coordinate transforms, lapiz, 12:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 12:15
Re: probability with ..., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:15
Re: Galileo's Paradox, stephen, 12:12
Re: topology with metric space., mina_world, 12:08
Re: probability with ..., mina_world, 12:04
Re: topology with metric space., José Carlos Santos, 12:03
Re: Volume of finite body, fred . zakity, 12:00
topology with metric space., mina_world, 11:52
Re: Problems on Extremal Principle ?, Narasimham, 11:51
Re: probability with ..., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:44
Re: Problems on Extremal Principle ?, Narasimham, 11:39
Volume of finite body, Cristee, 11:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:34
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, G. A. Edgar, 11:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:24
Re: standard terminology regarding sequences? (help!), fregegottlob, 11:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:20
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, Randy Poe, 11:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:13
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, Randy Poe, 11:11
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, Jonathan Hoyle, 11:11
Re: standard terminology regarding sequences? (help!), Arturo Magidin, 11:10
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Ross A. Finlayson, 11:09
standard terminology regarding sequences? (help!), fregegottlob, 11:06
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, Math1723, 11:03
Re: Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), David C. Ullrich, 11:02
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, Jonathan Hoyle, 11:00
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?-, David C. Ullrich, 10:57
Counterexample with a tangent cone, eugene, 10:54
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 10:42
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, José Carlos Santos, 10:35
Re: NP-hardness, stephen, 10:29
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 10:11
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?-, JEMebius, 10:11
Re: loops, Steven Lord, 10:10
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 10:01
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 09:58
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 09:56
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, tjb, 09:52
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 09:52
Re: A Rudin's approach, Larry Hammick, 09:48
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Chip Eastham, 09:43
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:38
Re: Problems on Extremal Principle ?, Larry Hammick, 09:36
Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, José Carlos Santos, 09:36
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 09:26
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, abe . buckingham, 09:12
Re: Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), royend, 09:02
Re: Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), royend, 08:58
Re: help me pls, Vinu, 08:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Jesse F. Hughes, 08:30
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:12
Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?, tjb, 08:00
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:43
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, David C . Ullrich, 07:36
Re: AC is inconsistent?, aatu . koskensilta, 07:35
Re: Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), David C . Ullrich, 07:31
Re: A Rudin's approach, David C . Ullrich, 07:27
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 07:06
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 07:05
سكس خليجي سكس بلوتوث سكس عرب سكس العربي, sofiane, 07:03
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 07:02
Re: Early 19th/20th Century Algebra Texts, jsavard, 07:02
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Sorcerer, 07:01
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:01
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, jsavard, 06:56
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 06:55
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 06:50
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, jsavard, 06:48
Re: sequence 0 1 0 -1 (repeat), dharrington, 06:44
Re: NP-hardness, sara, 06:40
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:39
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 06:36
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:35
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 06:30
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 06:29
Problems on Extremal Principle ?, kishore, 06:28
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 06:27
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 06:26
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 06:25
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 06:24
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:16
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Mike Kelly, 06:15
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Mike Kelly, 06:06
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:04
Re: probability with ..., mina_world, 06:02
Re: sequence 0 1 0 -1 (repeat), jpalecek, 06:00
Re: isomorphic subgroups of a finite group, Jim Heckman, 05:54
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 05:54
Re: probability with ..., jpalecek, 05:51
Re: The class of transitive sets., jpalecek, 05:44
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations, beeworks, 05:43
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 05:41
Re: NP-hardness, jpalecek, 05:28
sequence 0 1 0 -1 (repeat), dharrington, 05:28
Re: Roulette software statistics, cunchy64, 05:28
Re: probability with ..., mina_world, 05:10
Re: probability with ..., jpalecek, 05:00
Re: Tchebycheff Polynom, starting at deMoivre's Formula, Han de Bruijn, 04:55
Re: practice exam question, Michael Press, 04:21
Weighted graph partitioning, ivanb, 04:21
Re: isomorphic subgroups of a finite group, Derek Holt, 04:16
[wikipedia] vector fields and coordinate transforms, Pouya D. Tafti, 04:13
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Phil Carmody, 04:02
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Phil Carmody, 03:57
Re: JSH: Under review, Michael Press, 03:51
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Phil Carmody, 03:50
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 03:48
Re: Reverse (newbie question), Phil Carmody, 03:46
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Michael Press, 03:45
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 03:39
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 03:32
probability with ..., mina_world, 03:25
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 03:23
Re: NP-hardness, sara, 03:23
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 03:22
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 03:11
Re: isomorphic subgroups of a finite group, Ted Hwa, 03:01
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 02:57
Re: NP-hardness, Proginoskes, 02:56
Re: The class of transitive sets., Ross A. Finlayson, 02:49
Re: NP-hardness, sara, 02:41
Re: NP-hardness, Proginoskes, 02:22
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tony Orlow, 02:19
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tony Orlow, 02:17
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 02:14
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 02:13
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 02:10
why I think this is the correct Faraday Law Integral E dot ds= (ue) (-)dB/dt +(-) u i Re: Dirac's page 45 in DIRECTIONS IN PHYSICS confirms Gauss law should be Integral B dot dA = q/e and positive sign Re: Dirac confirms the new Maxwell Gauss law would be Integral B dot dA = q/e, a_plutonium, 02:09
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 02:08
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 02:07
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Richard Henry, 02:05
Re: isomorphic subgroups of a finite group, Paul Sperry, 02:04
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., Tony Orlow, 02:02
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, Mike H, 01:45
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, Paul Sperry, 01:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tony Orlow, 01:32
Re: Question for EB, Ralf Bader, 01:29
Re: The class of transitive sets., Virgil, 01:29
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., Tony Orlow, 01:26
Early 19th/20th Century Algebra Texts, hi . roodee, 01:26
Re: general ratio test, The World Wide Wade, 01:25
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 00:51
Re: nice,erdos,can. math bull, Gerry Myerson, 00:50
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 00:48
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 00:45
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 00:42
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 00:41
Re: The class of transitive sets., zuhair, 00:37
NP-hardness, sara, 00:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 00:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 00:33
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., zuhair, 00:28
Re: loops, JGBoone@xxxxxxxxx, 00:16
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:05
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., zuhair, 00:05

November 28, 2006

Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, Tony Orlow, 23:49
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, Gib Bogle, 23:48
Re: A Rudin's approach, TCL, 23:45
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 23:36
Re: roots in Z/pZ hence reducible ?, Pete Klimek, 23:31
Re: The class of transitive sets., Butch Malahide, 23:31
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tony Orlow, 23:30
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tony Orlow, 23:28
help me pls, Hanamichiru16@xxxxxxxxx, 23:27
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 23:25
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 23:22
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tony Orlow, 23:20
Re: Reverse (newbie question), Robert Israel, 23:11
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Michael Press, 23:03
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:54
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., Tony Orlow, 22:47
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, jsavard, 22:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:27
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, jsavard, 22:27
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:24
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, jsavard, 22:24
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:21
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 22:21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, jsavard, 22:20
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, jsavard, 22:17
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, jsavard, 22:07
Re: Conditions for Fejér vs Tauber, anon5874, 22:03
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, jsavard, 22:02
Re: Re: Conditions for Fejér vs Tauber, Robert Israel, 22:01
Re: Roulette software statistics, TheLaughingMan, 21:41
Re: practice exam question, Proginoskes, 21:37
Re: practice exam question, TheLaughingMan, 21:30
Re: The class of transitive sets., Rupert, 21:30
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:26
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., zuhair, 21:19
Re: nice,erdos,can. math bull, Ashay Burungale, 21:08
The class of transitive sets., zuhair, 21:06
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:05
Re: A Rudin's approach, TCL, 21:01
Re: I WILL GET MY MONEY, Proginoskes, 20:57
loops, JGBoone@xxxxxxxxx, 20:34
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:31
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, Michael Press, 20:22
practice exam question, Blocker Dog, 20:21
Re: Reverse (newbie question), ChaotischesNeutrales, 20:18
Re: simultaneous equations for exp function, Martin, 19:52
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, Cary, 19:52
Re: general ratio test, rancid moth, 19:46
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:28
Re: Conditions for Fejér vs Tauber, anon5874, 19:19
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Proginoskes, 19:11
Re: Conditions for Fejér vs Tauber, Robert Israel, 19:08
Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, MoeBlee, 19:08
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 19:06
Re: Reverse (newbie question), Proginoskes, 19:01
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Jesse F. Hughes, 19:00
isomorphic subgroups of a finite group, gs2081, 19:00
Re: Conditions for Fej�r vs Tauber, The World Wide Wade, 18:56
How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?, Luke Wu, 18:40
Re: JSH: Sabotage!, Larry Hammick, 18:37
roots in Z/pZ hence reducible ?, Fedor, 18:34
Re: Roulette software statistics, gjedwards, 18:20
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations / Summary of E407, JEMebius, 18:14
Re: Roulette software statistics, John McCarten, 18:09
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Larry Hammick, 18:00
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:38
Re: discrete math with difficult party., bill, 17:38
Re: I am studying concrete mathematic myself .Which books I should read?, David Moran, 17:33
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Proginoskes, 17:33
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 17:19
Re: JSH: Minority view, Red, 17:03
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:52
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:44
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:41
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:40
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., MoeBlee, 16:32
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 16:31
Re: Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), Badger, 16:24
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Virgil, 16:21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:17
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:13
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:11
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, MoeBlee, 16:10
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Rupert, 16:09
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:05
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:03
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, John H Palmieri, 16:03
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:57
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, Arturo Magidin, 15:57
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:55
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., zuhair, 15:49
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:48
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, galathaea, 15:46
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 15:45
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., zuhair, 15:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:41
Re: Unimodality of Dirichlet distribution, Herman Rubin, 15:38
Conditions for Fejér vs Tauber, anon5874, 15:37
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:37
Re: Extension map from S^n to D^(n+1) and null homotopic., W. Dale Hall, 15:35
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, MoeBlee, 15:34
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:31
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 15:30
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 15:23
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations, John C . Polasek, 15:19
Re: Best Rule of Thumb to Use for HIGH/LOW Crockpot Cooking, M Rath, 15:14
Re: Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), royend, 15:14
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:09
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Michael Press, 15:03
Re: Best Rule of Thumb to Use for HIGH/LOW Crockpot Cooking, M Rath, 14:58
Re: Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), Badger, 14:52
Hawking's Mind of God and Einstein's Gravity Field, Jack Sarfatti, 14:50
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, Pubkeybreaker, 14:47
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Dave Seaman, 14:47
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, Tim Peters, 14:37
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations, Hero, 14:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:12
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Arthur J. O'Dwyer, 14:12
Re: "pi", Herman Rubin, 14:11
Re: A Rudin's approach, David C. Ullrich, 14:10
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Nick, 14:05
Re: exp(-1/x^2) continuity, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 13:50
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 13:43
Re: Best Rule of Thumb to Use for HIGH/LOW Crockpot Cooking, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:40
Re: Best Rule of Thumb to Use for HIGH/LOW Crockpot Cooking, David T. Ashley, 13:39
Baby stat question, Bart Goddard, 13:39
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, george, 13:35
Re: Best Rule of Thumb to Use for HIGH/LOW Crockpot Cooking, Lee Rudolph, 13:31
Best Rule of Thumb to Use for HIGH/LOW Crockpot Cooking, David T. Ashley, 13:28
Dirac's page 45 in DIRECTIONS IN PHYSICS confirms Gauss law should be Integral B dot dA = q/e and positive sign Re: Dirac confirms the new Maxwell Gauss law would be Integral B dot dA = q/e, a_plutonium, 13:25
Gregoire: Delay math standard, admin, 13:24
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 13:18
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 13:03
Re: 3b^2 = a^2 + c^2 , a,b, and c are rational, Pubkeybreaker, 12:40
Re: Roulette software statistics, cunchy64, 12:17
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 12:10
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 12:04
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, Pubkeybreaker, 11:54
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, luiroto, 11:39
Re: Roulette software statistics, John McCarten, 11:28
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Richard Henry, 11:15
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Richard Henry, 11:13
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, luiroto, 10:59
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:57
Re: A Rudin's approach, TCL, 10:49
Re: Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), royend, 10:49
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 10:47
Tensor Equation, Hauke Reddmann, 10:41
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:40
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 10:34
Algebraic Geometry: Residue fields and constant fields, Carl Jones, 10:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tonico, 10:21
Re: Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), David C . Ullrich, 10:19
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 10:18
Re: Galileo's Paradox, stephen, 10:17
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 10:17
Re: Galileo's Paradox, stephen, 10:14
Re: Question for EB, Eckard Blumschein, 10:10
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 10:09
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations, John C . Polasek, 10:08
Re: JSH: Under review, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:03
Re: JSH: Under review, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:57
Re: Covering of a unit square, David W . Cantrell, 09:55
Re: exp(-1/x^2) continuity, Dave L. Renfro, 09:54
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tonico, 09:50
Re: A Rudin's approach, David C . Ullrich, 09:50
Re: How many chess games are there?...and who wins?, Dave L. Renfro, 09:47
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:37
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, smuggie, 09:32
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:32
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:28
Re: Covering of a unit square, David C . Ullrich, 09:25
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:20
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:19
Calculate Gibbs phenomenon (how to?), royend, 09:17
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, David C . Ullrich, 09:17
Roulette software statistics, cunchy64, 09:17
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 09:16
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:16
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Dik T. Winter, 09:16
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:13
Re: A Rudin's approach, David C . Ullrich, 09:13
Re: A Rudin's approach, David C . Ullrich, 09:11
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Jesse F. Hughes, 08:48
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:43
Regalissimo per le feste...e non !, www_sistemix_it, 08:40
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:38
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, Arturo Magidin, 08:33
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:18
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:03
Re: A simple question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, A N Niel, 08:02
Re: Tchebycheff Polynom, starting at deMoivre's Formula, Han de Bruijn, 07:52
A simple question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, huxuelei630, 07:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 07:35
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:31
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 07:27
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 07:23
bootstrapping, smart0072000in, 07:00
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 06:59
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, The Last Danish Pastry, 06:37
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 06:35
Covering of a unit square, Julien Santini, 06:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 06:33
Re: FInd solutions to f(x) + (1/x)f(1/x) = 1/[2(1+x)], alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 06:25
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Herman Jurjus, 06:13
Re: AC is inconsistent?, aatu . koskensilta, 05:34
Re: 3b^2 = a^2 + c^2 , a,b, and c are rational, someonekicked, 05:31
Re: AC is inconsistent?, aatu . koskensilta, 05:30
مقطع بلووتوث سكس للبنت صغار 16 سنة ... !!, سكس الغربي 2006, 05:18
Re: General Steps For Solving a First Order Linear ODE, Cary, 04:53
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 04:41
Re: Reverse (newbie question), crespoh, 04:37
Re: Reverse (newbie question), crespoh, 04:14
Re: discrete math with difficult party., bill, 04:03
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Helmut Richter, 03:59
Re: Grid of resistors (linear algebra? combinatorics?), Ray Johnstone, 03:44
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Ron Hardin, 03:31
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Tim Peters, 03:27
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, eugene, 03:11
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Proginoskes, 03:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 03:04
Re: JSH: Minority view, Proginoskes, 03:02
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Proginoskes, 02:56
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Proginoskes, 02:52
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Proginoskes, 02:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Ralf Bader, 02:42
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, fishfry, 02:41
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Proginoskes, 02:39
Re: fourier transformation and distributions, Volker Boie, 02:37
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Proginoskes, 02:34
Re: discrete math with difficult party., bill, 02:32
Re: General Steps For Solving a First Order Linear ODE, Virgil, 02:28
Re: JSH -- (untitled), Proginoskes, 02:24
Re: FInd solutions to f(x) + (1/x)f(1/x) = 1/[2(1+x)], Proginoskes, 02:23
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Phil Carmody, 02:22
:: tarski's fixed point theorem in pretopoi ::, galathaea, 02:12
Re: simultaneous equations for exp function, Robert Israel, 02:04
Re: I WILL GET MY MONEY, eBayer, 01:52
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, Gib Bogle, 01:34
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", galathaea, 01:33
Re: A Rudin's approach, Larry Hammick, 01:28
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 01:04
Re: general one-one transformation question., dillogimp, 01:01
Re: Triangular distribution, google.com, 00:54
Re: General Steps For Solving a First Order Linear ODE, Protoman, 00:46
Re: infinite product, Gottfried Helms, 00:45
Triangular distribution, google.com, 00:44
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", BDH, 00:27
Re: General Steps For Solving a First Order Linear ODE, Virgil, 00:25
Re: JSH: Minority view, smuggie, 00:20
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 00:19
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., zuhair, 00:15
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", marcus_b, 00:11
Re: Question for EB, Virgil, 00:11
Re: fourier transformation and distributions, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:03
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Virgil, 00:02

November 27, 2006

Re: fourier transformation and distributions, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:58
Re: general one-one transformation question., dillogimp, 23:57
Re: Math error in 'The Perfect Storm' starring George Clooney?, William Hughes, 23:52
Re: How many chess games are there?...and who wins?, Rupert, 23:52
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., zuhair, 23:27
Re: Math error in 'The Perfect Storm' starring George Clooney?, Randy Poe, 23:21
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, Tim Peters, 23:21
How many chess games are there?...and who wins?, Ray Johnstone, 23:08
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Dennis Ritchie, 22:58
Math error in 'The Perfect Storm' starring George Clooney?, gw84a, 22:57
Re: You people are stupid, David T. Ashley, 22:57
Re: Inner Products: Derived property, Kenneth Bull, 22:53
Re: Inner Products: Derived property, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:45
Re: Tchebycheff Polynom, starting at deMoivre's Formula, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:42
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations, schoenfeld . one, 22:42
Re: Tchebycheff Polynom, starting at deMoivre's Formula, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:41
Re: Continuity of certain function..., The World Wide Wade, 22:35
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Rupert, 22:26
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, Tim Peters, 22:18
Inner Products: Derived property, Tommy Haas, 22:17
Re: Extension map from S^n to D^(n+1) and null homotopic., Patt, 22:14
Re: idempotent functions, theronruiz, 22:13
Calculating the bounding rectange of Hilbert curve segment?, longmao88, 22:09
Re: infinite product, The World Wide Wade, 22:06
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, Gerry Myerson, 22:02
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Larry Hammick, 21:52
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:52
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:48
Unimodality of Dirichlet distribution, Jamaica R., 21:48
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:46
simultaneous equations for exp function, Martin, 21:45
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, Andrew Usher, 21:43
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:41
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:39
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:38
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Andrew Usher, 21:35
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:35
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Dik T. Winter, 21:32
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Butch Malahide, 21:16
Re: You people are stupid, Larry Hammick, 21:10
Re: Question for EB, Dik T. Winter, 21:05
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, David Moran, 21:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:01
Re: general one-one transformation question., dillogimp, 21:00
Re: exp(-1/x^2) continuity, Robert Israel, 20:58
Re: I am studying concrete mathematic myself .Which books I should read?, Solo.Wolve, 20:58
Re: general one-one transformation question., Robert Israel, 20:55
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", sttscitrans, 20:53
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Robert Israel, 20:45
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, Tony Orlow, 20:43
exp(-1/x^2) continuity, vsgdp, 20:40
JSH: I WILL GET MY MONEY, jstevh@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:40
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, MA, 20:37
I am studying concrete mathematic myself .Which books I should read?, Solo.Wolve, 20:35
I am studying concrete mathematic myself .Which books I should read?, Solo.Wolve, 20:35
general one-one transformation question., dillogimp, 20:33
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, Tony Orlow, 20:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:32
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, Lord Protector, 20:31
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, jstevh, 20:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:25
Re: JSH: You people are stupid, Lord Protector, 20:25
JSH: You people are stupid, jstevh, 20:23
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, William Hughes, 20:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:14
Re: Ordinals?Cardinals?, David R Tribble, 20:11
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, jstevh, 20:04
Re: Ordinals?Cardinals?, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:00
General Steps For Solving a First Order Linear ODE, Protoman, 19:56
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, galathaea, 19:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:48
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, eugene, 19:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:47
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, Sweet Sugir, 19:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:44
Re: JSH: Minority view, jstevh, 19:43
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, Sweet Sugir, 19:42
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Nick, 19:41
Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, galathaea, 19:38
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Nick, 19:34
Number of abelian groups + exact sequence, eugene, 19:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:10
Re: Ordinals?Cardinals?, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:04
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., MoeBlee, 18:55
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Nick, 18:55
Re: infinite product, Ioannis, 18:49
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, MoeBlee, 18:42
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Michael Press, 18:39
Re: Ordinals?Cardinals?, zuhair, 18:37
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 18:32
Re: infinite product, Robert Israel, 18:30
Re: infinite product, The World Wide Wade, 18:30
Re: Extension map from S^n to D^(n+1) and null homotopic., W. Dale Hall, 18:28
Z.Irregular Set Theory. A correction., zuhair, 18:24
Re: Extension map from S^n to D^(n+1) and null homotopic., W. Dale Hall, 18:24
Re: fourier transformation and distributions, gilraen, 18:21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Michael Press, 18:16
Re: Ordinals?Cardinals?, zuhair, 18:13
Re: Ordinals?Cardinals?, Ross A. Finlayson, 18:04
Re: infinite product, Gottfried Helms, 18:03
Re: geometry with high school., mina_world, 17:54
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Russell, 17:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:36
Re: Ordinals?Cardinals?, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:31
Re: Science Congress to Standardize symbols Re: computers of future having a "science key" to write science fluently, Mike Wright, 17:26
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:17
Re: infinite product, The World Wide Wade, 17:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:13
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Gerry Myerson, 17:10
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Sorcerer, 17:10
Re: Help with understainding Continuous Distribution Functions, Taria, 17:09
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Russell, 17:08
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations, Hero, 17:02
Extension map from S^n to D^(n+1) and null homotopic., Patt, 17:02
Re: Conjugacy classes and automorphisms, Derek Holt, 17:01
Re: A Rudin's approach, TCL, 16:56
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Mike Wright, 16:53
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations, John C . Polasek, 16:50
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 16:43
Re: Help with understainding Continuous Distribution Functions, Randy Poe, 16:32
Re: discrete math with difficult party., bill, 16:32
Re: discrete math with difficult party., bill, 16:30
Re: Tchebycheff Polynom, starting at deMoivre's Formula, david petry, 16:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:17
Help with understainding Continuous Distribution Functions, Taria, 16:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:10
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Jerry Kraus, 16:08
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 16:03
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Russell, 16:01
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:58
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:55
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:53
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Jerry Kraus, 15:48
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Dirk Van de moortel, 15:47
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Jerry Kraus, 15:47
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:46
Re: analysis with divergence., The World Wide Wade, 15:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:41
Re: discrete math with difficult party., bill, 15:39
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:35
Re: [] Exercise on ordered sets, Marc Olschok, 15:34
Ordinals?Cardinals?, zuhair, 15:30
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:27
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Gottfried Helms, 15:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 15:25
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Richard Henry, 15:24
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Russell, 15:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 15:20
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:19
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tonico, 15:15
Conjugacy classes and automorphisms, Jules, 15:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 15:05
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:04
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 15:00
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Jesse F. Hughes, 14:58
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:55
Re: History of the Equals Sign, Virgil, 14:54
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Narasimham, 14:50
Re: JSH: Minority view, Lord Protector, 14:49
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Randy Poe, 14:47
Re: Galileo's Paradox, stephen, 14:47
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Gib Bogle, 14:43
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Pubkeybreaker, 14:34
Re: Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., zuhair, 14:34
reciprocal polynomial in a cyclic code, sgonzales, 14:29
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 14:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe, 14:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 14:22
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", sttscitrans, 14:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 14:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:15
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Phil Carmody, 14:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 14:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 14:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:52
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 13:47
Re: Definite integral, function of its limit only, Narasimham, 13:46
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 13:42
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Hero, 13:39
Re: Expectation of Euclidean distance, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:29
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:29
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations, badd_xi2, 13:21
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 13:18
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations, Hero, 13:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 13:14
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Sorcerer, 13:07
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Helmut Richter, 13:02
Re: Definite integral, function of its limit only, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:01
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", marcus_b, 12:59
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 12:58
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:58
inverse fourier transform of green's function, ganesh, 12:57
Re: Definition of locally convex space, barr, 12:56
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Dave Seaman, 12:49
inverse fourier transform of green's function, gcdiwan, 12:49
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Bart Goddard, 12:48
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Tony Orlow, 12:44
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Helmut Richter, 12:44
patent on Science Key to make science writing fluent on the Internet Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, a_plutonium, 12:41
Re: idempotent functions, cbrown, 12:40
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 12:40
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 12:35
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 12:31
differential equations, pieterprovoost, 12:29
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 12:22
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Sorcerer, 12:22
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", sttscitrans, 12:18
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Herman Rubin, 12:09
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 11:58
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Herman Rubin, 11:58
Re: JSH -- (untitled), Davie, 11:50
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 11:39
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 11:37
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Ross A. Finlayson, 11:35
Casio watch syndrome and Streamlining the Computer keyboard-- sublimate the f-keys Re: Science Congress to Standardize symbols Re: computers of future having a "science key" to write science fluently, a_plutonium, 11:28
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Chris Menzel, 11:21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tonico, 11:20
Re: Countability of real numbers, Tonico, 11:17
A Rudin's approach, TCL, 11:02
Re: JSH: Minority view, Victor Eijkhout, 10:59
Re: JSH, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:57
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Chip Eastham, 10:49
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", jankrihau, 10:47
Re: Tchebycheff Polynom, starting at deMoivre's Formula, Han de Bruijn, 10:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:33
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Rod, 10:23
Re: Countability of real numbers, Albrecht, 10:23
Re: !!!, Sorcerer, 10:23
To CONCRETE MATHEMATICS reader, huxuelei630, 10:21
Re: Need German equivalent of "crank", Gottfried Helms, 10:19
Re: Definite integral, function of its limit only, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 10:18
Science Congress to Standardize symbols Re: computers of future having a "science key" to write science fluently, a_plutonium, 10:17
Re: N-Dimensional Rotations, Gottfried Helms, 10:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 10:04
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:58
Re: Tchebycheff Polynom, starting at deMoivre's Formula, David C . Ullrich, 09:58
Re: geometry with high school., hagman, 09:56
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:54
Re: limsup, David C . Ullrich, 09:51
!!!, Eckard Blumschein, 09:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:49
Re: geometry with high school., mina_world, 09:45
Re: School Geometry Question, The Last Danish Pastry, 09:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:43
Re: Tchebycheff Polynom, starting at deMoivre's Formula, Badger, 09:43
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 09:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:32
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 09:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:30
N-Dimensional Rotations, schoenfeld . one, 09:29
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 09:27
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 09:21
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:11
spice, Thorsten Kiefer, 09:10
Need German equivalent of "crank", Larry Hammick, 09:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:07
Re: 3b^2 = a^2 + c^2 , a,b, and c are rational, Pubkeybreaker, 09:05
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 08:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:34
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, David C . Ullrich, 08:34
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, David C . Ullrich, 08:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:30
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, David C . Ullrich, 08:29
Re: JSH, Jesse F. Hughes, 08:28
Re: JSH: Minority view, Arturo Magidin, 08:23
Re: Tchebycheff Polynom, starting at deMoivre's Formula, Narasimham, 08:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 08:08
Definite integral, function of its limit only, Narasimham, 08:08
Re: JSH: Minority view, Larry Hammick, 08:07
Re: School Geometry Question, whatshelei, 08:01
Re: JSH: Minority view, jankrihau, 08:00
Re: Tchebycheff Polynom, starting at deMoivre's Formula, Matthias Knelangen, 07:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 07:54
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:51
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Narasimham, 07:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 07:41
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Peter T. Daniels, 07:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Bob Kolker, 07:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 07:22
Re: School Geometry Question, Giovanni Resta, 07:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 07:21
geometry with high school., mina_world, 07:17
Re: FInd solutions to f(x) + (1/x)f(1/x) = 1/[2(1+x)], ben, 07:04
Re: School Geometry Question, Larry Hammick, 07:01
Re: Question for EB, Gottfried Helms, 06:55
Re: Tchebycheff Polynom, starting at deMoivre's Formula, Nik, 06:52
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 06:46
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 06:45
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 06:44
Re: Question for EB, Bob Kolker, 06:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 06:39
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tonico, 06:39
Tchebycheff Polynom, starting at deMoivre's Formula, Matthias Knelangen, 06:20
Re: infinite product, Gottfried Helms, 06:14
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:11
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:05
Re: History of the Equals Sign, Larry Hammick, 06:04
Re: infinite product, Gottfried Helms, 05:58
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 05:57
New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 27, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:55
Re: Question for EB, Gottfried Helms, 05:55
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 05:54
Integrals of matrix exponentials acting on a vector, uekstrom, 05:52
Re: School Geometry Question, N. Silver, 05:46
Re: History of the Equals Sign, bert, 05:45
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 05:42
History of the Equals Sign, Han de Bruijn, 05:33
Re: R: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 05:25
Question for EB, Bob Kolker, 05:23
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 05:21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 05:21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 05:17
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 05:12
School Geometry Question, Herb, 05:11
Expectation of Euclidean distance, Roy Chang, 04:59
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 04:51
Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 04:47
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 04:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 04:30
Re: About vector valued functions, kunzmilan, 04:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 04:26
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 04:23
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 04:21
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Virgil, 04:12
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 04:10
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 04:05
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 04:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 03:59
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 03:54
Re: analysis with divergence., Michael Press, 03:53
Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 03:49
Re: Reverse (newbie question), William Elliot, 03:46
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 03:46
Re: Archimeds Plutonium: Scientest --- NOT, imbibe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (David Polewka), 03:45
Re: Continuity of certain function..., William Elliot, 03:42
Re: 3b^2 = a^2 + c^2 , a,b, and c are rational, Giovanni Resta, 03:34
Re: R: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 03:33
Re: Countability of real numbers, Albrecht, 03:32
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Albrecht, 03:21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Albrecht, 03:19
3b^2 = a^2 + c^2 , a,b, and c are rational, someonekicked, 03:13
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Proginoskes, 02:59
Finding x of hypergeometric 2F1[a,b,c,x] ?, titus_piezas, 02:54
Re: R: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 02:51
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Phil Carmody, 02:50
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 02:36
Re: "pi", Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 02:21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 02:08
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 01:54
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 01:49
Re: normal infinite sequences over infinite alphabets, S J Kissane, 01:48
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Proginoskes, 01:46
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Proginoskes, 01:22
Re: "pi", Proginoskes, 01:13
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Proginoskes, 01:01
Re: JSH -- (untitled), Proginoskes, 00:52
Re: normal infinite sequences over infinite alphabets, Butch Malahide, 00:52
Re: AC is inconsistent?, aatu . koskensilta, 00:43
Re: Volumes of Curves Around Curves, Davie, 00:42
Re: Reverse (newbie question), Davie, 00:40
Re: computers of future having a "science key" to write science fluently, Mike Wright, 00:39
Re: JSH, Davie, 00:39
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 00:37
Volumes of Curves Around Curves, nebx, 00:23

November 26, 2006

Re: normal infinite sequences over infinite alphabets, S J Kissane, 23:58
JSH, dtf, 23:49
Re: Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., zuhair, 23:48
Re: Reverse (newbie question), marcus_b, 23:45
Re: JSH: Minority view, Brian, 23:45
Re: Reverse (newbie question), Brian, 23:42
Re: For God's sake!, Brian, 23:32
Re: vector addition and minimizing the angle of resultant vector with x-axis, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 23:32
Re: normal infinite sequences over infinite alphabets, Butch Malahide, 23:31
Re: computers of future having a "science key" to write science fluently, Peter T. Daniels, 23:31
Re: Minority view, Karenia Brevis, 23:23
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, sg552, 23:05
Reverse (newbie question), crespoh, 22:52
Re: Reverse (newbie question), marcus_b, 22:51
Re: Reverse (newbie question), Rupert, 22:47
Reverse (newbie question), crespoh, 22:43
Re: from almost surely convergence to in probability convergence?, Robert Israel, 22:36
Re: About vector valued functions, Robert Israel, 22:30
computers of future having a "science key" to write science fluently, a_plutonium, 22:20
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:03
how to engineer the computers so that they can write fluently in science as well as language -- a science key, a_plutonium, 21:57
Re: Linear programming problem, Randy Poe, 21:37
normal infinite sequences over infinite alphabets, S J Kissane, 21:34
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 21:30
Re: Galileo's Paradox, stephen, 21:21
Re: "pi", Herman Rubin, 21:19
Re: Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., zuhair, 21:12
Re: Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., zuhair, 21:09
Re: nice,erdos,can. math bull, Butch Malahide, 21:08
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, Gerry Myerson, 21:05
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Butch Malahide, 21:01
Re: nice,erdos,can. math bull, Gerry Myerson, 21:00
Re: Linear programming problem, James Waldby, 20:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:50
from almost surely convergence to in probability convergence?, Mike, 20:26
Re: About vector valued functions, G Patel, 20:25
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, FJ, 20:24
Re: a science key to all new computers so that we can write science as fluently as language Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol, Dik T. Winter, 20:22
Re: vector addition and minimizing the angle of resultant vector with x-axis, john, 20:18
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, marcus_b, 20:08
limsup, Mike, 20:07
Re: About vector valued functions, Randy Poe, 20:06
About vector valued functions, G Patel, 19:58
Re: two independent Poisson processes, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:44
Re: fourier transformation and distributions, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:41
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Davie, 19:40
Re: idempotent functions, Robert Sheskey, 19:35
Re: JSH: Minority view, Davie, 19:28
Re: two independent Poisson processes, Robert Israel, 19:20
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, jshsucks, 19:18
Re: need a theorem on the continuity of the expectation of a stochastic process..., Robert Israel, 19:17
Re: two independent Poisson processes, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 19:13
Re: JSH: Minority view, jshsucks, 19:12
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Robert Israel, 19:09
two independent Poisson processes, Mike, 18:57
Re: need a theorem on the continuity of the expectation of a stochastic process..., Mike, 18:55
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, Robert Israel, 18:52
Re: vector addition and minimizing the angle of resultant vector with x-axis, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 18:43
Re: JSH: Minority view, jstevh, 18:38
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Jesse F. Hughes, 18:35
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, jstevh, 18:28
Re: fourier transformation and distributions, Pouya D. Tafti, 18:28
Re: vector addition and minimizing the angle of resultant vector with x-axis, john, 18:22
Re: JSH: Minority view, jstevh, 18:18
Re: infinite product, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:15
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, sg552, 18:13
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Davie, 18:10
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Davie, 18:08
Re: JSH: Minority view, Davie, 18:03
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:59
Re: Minority view, Davie, 17:58
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, jshsucks, 17:51
Re: JSH: Minority view, jshsucks, 17:49
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Butch Malahide, 17:44
fourier transformation and distributions, gilraen, 17:33
Re: Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., Rupert, 17:31
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, jstevh, 17:26
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, FJ, 17:25
Re: JSH: Minority view, jstevh, 17:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jacko, 17:04
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, bert, 17:00
Re: Continuity of certain function..., Arturo Magidin, 16:59
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Tim Peters, 16:55
Continuity of certain function..., Christopher Kolago, 16:48
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Jerry Kraus, 16:45
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Jerry Kraus, 16:37
Re: JSH: Minority view, Richard Henry, 16:36
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Pouya D. Tafti, 16:21
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, Nick, 16:19
Re: infinite product, The World Wide Wade, 16:14
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, Robert Israel, 16:11
Re: infinite product, The World Wide Wade, 16:04
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Nick, 15:59
Re: JSH: Minority view, Tim Peters, 15:57
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, Mpilot, 15:56
Re: infinite product, The World Wide Wade, 15:55
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Nick, 15:54
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, William Hughes, 15:54
Re: Archimeds Plutonium: Scientest --- NOT, Phil Carmody, 15:46
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Tim Peters, 15:45
Re: JSH: Minority view, Gib Bogle, 15:37
Re: JSH: Minority view, Gib Bogle, 15:36
Re: JSH: Minority view, jankrihau, 15:35
Re: JSH: Minority view, jankrihau, 15:27
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 15:24
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 15:24
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 15:23
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 15:23
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 15:22
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, jstevh, 15:20
JSH: Minority view, jstevh, 15:18
Re: a science key to all new computers so that we can write science as fluently as language Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol, Harlan Messinger, 15:16
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, Daniel Mayost, 15:14
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, sg552, 15:13
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, William Hughes, 15:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 15:11
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Hero, 15:04
Re: Question on Rings, Arturo Magidin, 15:01
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, jstevh, 14:50
Question on Rings, polymedes, 14:48
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, William Hughes, 14:42
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Narasimham, 14:39
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:35
Re: Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., zuhair, 14:31
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Ian Taylor, 14:24
Re: Archimeds Plutonium: Scientest --- NOT, Larry Hammick, 14:16
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, Nick, 14:06
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, jstevh, 14:01
Re: Archimeds Plutonium: Scientest --- NOT, Plutoniator, 14:00
Re: analysis with improper integral..._, mina_world, 13:59
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, Nick, 13:56
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, bluelabel, 13:55
Re: analysis with improper integral..._, Ioannis, 13:55
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Larry Hammick, 13:43
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Gib Bogle, 13:41
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Nick, 13:38
Re: Trig question, Bart Goddard, 13:37
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, jstevh, 13:36
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Nick, 13:36
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, Nick, 13:31
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, FJ, 13:25
Re: analysis with improper integral..._, Larry Hammick, 13:24
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Jussi Piitulainen, 13:24
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Mike Kelly, 13:20
Re: Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:18
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, Daniel Mayost, 13:14
analysis with improper integral..._, mina_world, 13:01
Has bad mathematics lead to engineering disasters?, toni . lassila, 13:01
Re: FInd solutions to f(x) + (1/x)f(1/x) = 1/[2(1+x)], Daniel Mayost, 12:57
Re: FInd solutions to f(x) + (1/x)f(1/x) = 1/[2(1+x)], Kevin Housen, 12:50
Re: FInd solutions to f(x) + (1/x)f(1/x) = 1/[2(1+x)], Kevin Housen, 12:49
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, jstevh, 12:45
Re: Linear programming problem, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:44
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Hero, 12:17
a science key to all new computers so that we can write science as fluently as language Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol, a_plutonium, 12:15
Re: Linear programming problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:12
JSH -- (untitled), Larry Hammick, 12:09
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Harlan Messinger, 12:06
Re: Functions that take sets of measure zero to sets of measure zero, Dave L. Renfro, 12:06
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, Mpilot, 12:02
Re: Linear programming problem, Ian Parker, 11:53
Faraday-Plutonium Law Integral E dot ds= (ue) (-)dB/dt + (-)u i Re: negative signs in the revised Maxwell Equations to accomodate Space = positrons = gravity, a_plutonium, 11:46
Linear programming problem, abadonna, 11:34
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Jussi Piitulainen, 11:20
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Chip Eastham, 11:18
Definition of locally convex space, Tommi Höynälänmaa, 11:14
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Jussi Piitulainen, 11:12
Re: nice,erdos,can. math bull, Ashay Burungale, 11:10
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Hero, 10:55
Re: JSH: Sabotage!, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:55
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, FJ, 10:29
On computational complexity, Artyom, 10:23
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, Mpilot, 10:19
Computational complexity question, Artyom, 10:12
Re: A problem I cannot solve, pschan, 09:50
Re: Exercise on ordered sets, Larry Hammick, 09:46
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 09:46
Re: Functions that take sets of measure zero to sets of measure zero, TCL, 09:37
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:36
Re: Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., zuhair, 09:36
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, Bob Kolker, 09:29
Re: question about a function, The Qurqirish Dragon, 09:29
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, The Qurqirish Dragon, 09:17
Re: A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, A N Niel, 09:16
A question in CONCRETE MATHEMATICS, huxuelei630, 08:55
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:42
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 08:09
Re: Taylor's Theorem, David C . Ullrich, 07:59
Re: "pi", Nick, 07:51
enough letters? Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol, Peter T. Daniels, 07:42
Re: question about a function, Larry Hammick, 07:35
question about a function, S J Kissane, 07:29
Re: "pi", Nick, 07:24
question about a function, S J Kissane, 07:19
Line bundles, liran, 06:32
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Rupert, 05:55
Re: Trig question, mitch, 05:28
Re: JSH: Sabotage!, Larry Hammick, 05:27
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Larry Hammick, 04:59
Re: analysis with improper integral._, Larry Hammick, 04:46
Re: "pi", Gottfried Helms, 04:41
Re: JSH: Sabotage!, Tim Peters, 04:40
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 04:22
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Keith Ramsay, 03:32
Re: vector addition and minimizing the angle of resultant vector with x-axis, Daniel Mayost, 03:15
Re: vector addition and minimizing the angle of resultant vector with x-axis, Virgil, 03:09
Re: Exercise on ordered sets, William Elliot, 02:58
Re: AC is inconsistent?, Virgil, 02:51
Re: Endless iterations involving pi., fasttrack2a, 02:37
vector addition and minimizing the angle of resultant vector with x-axis, john, 02:31
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Proginoskes, 02:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Ralf Bader, 02:17
Re: "pi", Proginoskes, 02:15
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Proginoskes, 02:13
Re: Trig question, Proginoskes, 02:07
Re: Plutonium-239 in nature, Andrew Usher, 02:04
Re: Archimeds Plutonium: Scientest --- NOT, Proginoskes, 02:03
AC is inconsistent?, Andrew Usher, 02:02
Re: FInd solutions to f(x) + (1/x)f(1/x) = 1/[2(1+x)], Proginoskes, 02:01
Re: Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Proginoskes, 01:54
Re: Conditional Probability Relations Question, Daniel Mayost, 01:47
Re: JSH: Sabotage!, Proginoskes, 01:46
Re: Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Proginoskes, 01:39
Re: Endless iterations involving pi., Proginoskes, 01:35
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, 2b, 00:41
Simultaneous Equations, Deep, 00:21
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Math1723, 00:13
Conditional Probability Relations Question, FJ, 00:10

November 25, 2006

Re: [] Exercise on ordered sets, Butch Malahide, 23:56
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 23:55
Re: nice,erdos,can. math bull, Robert Israel, 23:18
Re: For God's sake!, Andrew Usher, 22:54
Re: Taylor's Theorem, lite . on . beta, 22:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:32
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Davie, 22:19
Re: JSH: Sabotage!, mrdarrett, 22:18
[] Exercise on ordered sets, William Elliot, 22:15
Re: JSH: Protecting the Riemann Hypothesis, Tim Peters, 22:06
Re: application of vectors in precalc, john, 21:52
Re: help, Nick, 21:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:50
Re: analysis with divergence., mina_world, 21:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:40
Re: infinite product, The World Wide Wade, 21:39
Re: Help with understanding how to do a Pearson's r, Nick, 21:33
Taylor's Theorem, lite . on . beta, 21:30
Re: "pi", Nick, 21:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:25
Re: Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., zuhair, 21:14
Re: JSH: Sabotage!, Davie, 20:47
Re: parametric function, novis, 20:27
application of vectors in precalc, john, 20:10
Re: A problem I cannot solve, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:58
parametric function, novis, 19:37
Re: discrete math with difficult party., bill, 19:20
Re: Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., Rupert, 18:56
Re: Roots of polynomials, dwevrick, 18:42
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 18:34
Re: Trig question, mitch, 18:11
References for Continuity Sets, Dave L. Renfro, 18:00
Re: Plutonium-239 in nature, bill, 17:29
Re: Indistinguishable families of graphs, Butch Malahide, 17:17
Re: Indistinguishable families of graphs, bill, 17:15
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Virgil, 17:10
Re: Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., Rupert, 17:02
Archimeds Plutonium: Scientest --- NOT, Bob Kolker, 16:55
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 16:51
Re: monotone functions, Butch Malahide, 16:45
Re: Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., zuhair, 16:40
Re: Exercise on ordered sets, Butch Malahide, 16:30
Re: infinite product, Gottfried Helms, 16:30
Re: monotone functions, Peter L. Montgomery, 16:23
Re: Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., Rupert, 16:19
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 16:15
Re: infinite product, The World Wide Wade, 16:04
Re: monotone functions, Arturo Magidin, 16:03
Re: Indistinguishable families of graphs, Artyom, 15:55
Re: monotone functions, Butch Malahide, 15:53
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, george, 15:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:50
Re: connectivity, Virgil, 15:41
Re: Trig question, Bart Goddard, 15:38
Re: Informal Infinity, zuhair, 15:32
Corrected Z.Irregular set theory., zuhair, 15:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:25
ZFC is a liar., zuhair, 15:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:18
Re: Trig question, mitch, 15:17
Re: Indistinguishable families of graphs, Butch Malahide, 15:11
Re: monotone functions, Arturo Magidin, 15:04
Re: FInd solutions to f(x) + (1/x)f(1/x) = 1/[2(1+x)], Peter L. Montgomery, 15:04
Re: Questions about field of Laurent series, Cao, 14:55
Re: monotone functions, Butch Malahide, 14:54
Re: connectivity, Daniel Mayost, 14:49
Re: How to solve for L?, bluelabel, 14:48
Re: On structure of NP-complete sets, Artyom, 14:47
Re: second partial derivatives commute (Clairaut's Thm.), Dave L. Renfro, 14:46
Re: analysis with divergence., The World Wide Wade, 14:39
monotone functions, vsgdp, 14:22
Re: For God's sake!, Bill Penrose, 14:20
Re: FInd solutions to f(x) + (1/x)f(1/x) = 1/[2(1+x)], Daniel Mayost, 14:20
Re: Questions about field of Laurent series, Kira Yamato, 14:18
Re: FInd solutions to f(x) + (1/x)f(1/x) = 1/[2(1+x)], Igor, 14:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:04
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 13:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:56
Unicode is not a custom-make-your-own symbol Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, a_plutonium, 13:54
Re: For God's sake!, Tonico, 13:53
Re: How to solve for L?, Ioannis, 13:47
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 13:25
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 13:22
connectivity, vsgdp, 13:16
Re: Informal Infinity, fishfry, 12:42
Q(a^1/n), eugene, 12:41
Re: For God's sake!, Bill Penrose, 12:41
Re: We are now recruiting some candidates, Maximilian von Krank, 12:30
How to solve for L?, bluelabel, 12:21
FInd solutions to f(x) + (1/x)f(1/x) = 1/[2(1+x)], kbhousen, 12:00
Re: Laguerre Polynomials, pisz_na . mirek, 11:28
Indistinguishable families of graphs, Artyom, 11:10
Re: analysis with improper integral._, Rob Johnson, 10:55
Practical Application of the "Liar's Paradox", Jerry Kraus, 10:53
Re: analysis with rearrangement_, Dave L. Renfro, 10:46
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 10:42
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 10:39
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 10:31
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 10:26
Re: growth condition of a continuous function, Dave L. Renfro, 10:25
Re: analysis with divergence., Dave L. Renfro, 10:21
Re: infinite product, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:19
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 10:17
Re: Functions that take sets of measure zero to sets of measure zero, Dave L. Renfro, 10:10
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, zuhair, 10:04
Re: Exercise on ordered sets, Larry Hammick, 09:51
Re: Why Regularity?, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:49
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:45
Help with understanding how to do a Pearson's r, rayzero, 09:11
Re: Question on ultraproducts, Chip Eastham, 08:54
Re: Trig question, Bart Goddard, 08:38
Re: Trig question, mitch, 08:10
analysis with improper integral._, mina_world, 08:06
Re: Roots of polynomials, Timothy Murphy, 07:47
Re: Exercise on ordered sets, Larry Hammick, 07:41
Re: Endless iterations involving pi., fasttrack2a, 07:37
Re: Trig question, mitch, 07:35
Re: Exercise on ordered sets, William Elliot, 07:22
Re: JSH: Use ratings, James Dolan, 07:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 06:53
Re: Exercise on ordered sets, Butch Malahide, 06:02
Questions about field of Laurent series, Cao, 06:00
Re: A problem I cannot solve, pschan, 05:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Ross A. Finlayson, 05:42
Re: Laguerre Polynomials, Badger, 05:27
analysis with divergence., mina_world, 05:14
Re: Exercise on ordered sets, Larry Hammick, 05:12
Re: Exercise on ordered sets, Larry Hammick, 05:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 04:57
Re: Probability question, Michael Press, 04:44
Re: Endless iterations involving pi., Ignacio Larrosa Ca�estro, 04:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:08
Re: Geometrical meaning of imaginary roots?, Narasimham, 04:07
Re: Exercise on ordered sets, Butch Malahide, 03:54
Re: tensor product twister, Jannick Asmus, 03:27
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 03:22
Re: Exercise on ordered sets, Rupert, 03:06
Problems about Second Order Differential Equation With Advanced Argument, HEDAS, 03:04
Re: Endless iterations involving pi., fasttrack2a, 02:48
Re: Endless iterations involving pi., Proginoskes, 02:24
Re: JSH: Sabotage!, Proginoskes, 02:19
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Butch Malahide, 02:17
Re: converting angle to fractional value, Proginoskes, 02:11
growth condition of a continuous function, novis, 02:01
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 02:01
Re: Informal Infinity, zuhair, 01:58
Re: On structure of NP-complete sets, Proginoskes, 01:57
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Proginoskes, 01:54
Re: infinite product, Gottfried Helms, 01:44
Re: Trig question, Proginoskes, 01:41
Re: Informal Infinity, fishfry, 01:34
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Proginoskes, 01:32
Re: Endless iterations involving pi., fasttrack2a, 01:28
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 01:06
Exercise on ordered sets, Larry Hammick, 00:39
Re: computing holograms, Ed Prochak, 00:38
Re: tensor product twister, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx, 00:30
Re: analysis with rearrangement_, mina_world, 00:29
Re: JSH: Sabotage!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:23
Re: analysis with limit-, mina_world, 00:19
Re: Informal Infinity, zuhair, 00:19
Re: analysis with difficult counter-example., mina_world, 00:17

November 24, 2006

Re: JSH: Sabotage!, Larry Hammick, 23:48
Re: JSH: Sabotage!, Davie, 23:37
Re: zero gradient surface-, The World Wide Wade, 23:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:56
Re: Plutonium-239 in nature, Dik T. Winter, 22:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:58
Re: Laguerre Polynomials, junoexpress, 21:21
Re: Geometrical meaning of imaginary roots?, Narasimham, 21:08
Re: Infinity Again, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:54
Re: JSH: Sabotage!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:52
Re: Functions that take sets of measure zero to sets of measure zero, Dave L. Renfro, 20:39
Re: Roots of polynomials, Jannick Asmus, 20:31
Roots of polynomials, dwevrick, 20:22
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, Robert Cohen, 20:21
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 20:17
Re: Compact Operators on Banach Spaces, Jannick Asmus, 20:15
Re: ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT DIATRIBE, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:59
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, J.S.Harris Fan, 19:56
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 19:51
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 19:47
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 19:46
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 19:45
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 19:44
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 19:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 19:35
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 19:32
Re: converting angle to fractional value, Trigger, 19:27
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 19:24
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 19:23
Re: Informal Infinity, zuhair, 19:23
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 19:20
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 19:18
Re: Laguerre Polynomials, Badger, 19:14
Re: Informal Infinity, zuhair, 19:13
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Michael Press, 19:04
JSH: Sabotage!, Tim Peters, 19:03
Ask Me Today., HireAndrewmoon . com, 18:47
Re: Abel's Convergence Theorem exercise, anon5874, 18:23
Re: A problem I cannot solve, Mate, 18:11
On structure of NP-complete sets, Artyom, 18:10
Re: For God's sake!, Richard Tobin, 17:57
Re: Plutonium-239 in nature, T Wake, 17:50
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Richard Tobin, 17:50
Plutonium-239 in nature, Andrew Usher, 17:43
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 17:41
Re: Informal Infinity, fishfry, 17:40
Re: Prolate surface area, David W . Cantrell, 17:37
Re: For God's sake!, T Wake, 17:35
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, Andrew Usher, 17:31
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Virgil, 17:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:22
Re: For God's sake!, Andrew Usher, 17:21
Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 17:18
Re: Endless iterations involving pi., Dork Spotter, 17:16
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, Andrew Usher, 17:16
Laguerre Polynomials, junoexpress, 17:14
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tonico, 17:10
Re: R: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:07
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Michael Press, 16:58
Re: A problem I cannot solve, Virgil, 16:58
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:52
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:43
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Michael Press, 16:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 16:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 16:38
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:36
Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 16:32
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:26
Converting from perifocal velocities to cartesian coordinates, ubermenchster, 16:24
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:22
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:20
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Tim Peters, 16:15
Re: idempotent functions, cbrown, 16:15
Re: Question on ultraproducts, Butch Malahide, 16:07
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 16:06
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 16:03
Re: idempotent functions, cbrown, 16:00
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 15:58
Re: A problem I cannot solve, A N Niel, 15:57
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Eckard Blumschein, 15:54
Re: integral over bessel function, kilbinge, 15:53
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 15:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 15:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:29
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 15:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:17
Re: Abel's Convergence Theorem exercise, The World Wide Wade, 15:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:15
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 15:12
Re: analysis with limit-, The World Wide Wade, 15:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:11
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 15:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:07
Re: Infinity Again, Virgil, 15:01
Re: Prolate surface area, George Orwell, 14:54
Re: A problem I cannot solve, pschan, 14:53
R: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 14:50
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 14:43
Re: Geometrical meaning of imaginary roots?, Narasimham, 14:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 14:39
Re: Modular Algebra: Find number of elements of a subset modulo n, Dani Camps, 14:38
Re: A problem I cannot solve, anon5874, 14:36
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 14:34
Re: A problem I cannot solve, pschan, 14:24
Re: analysis with difficult counter-example., anon5874, 14:23
Don't quibble with Kibble on tetrads and spin connections, Jack Sarfatti, 14:22
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 14:16
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 14:06
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 14:01
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Chris Menzel, 13:57
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 13:50
Re: infinite product, Ioannis, 13:48
Re: Infinity Again, Eckard Blumschein, 13:39
Re: Trig question, Bart Goddard, 13:26
Re: Galileo's Paradox, stephen, 13:26
Re: Number theory problem, bigh2000, 13:24
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 13:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:23
Re: Modular Algebra: Find number of elements of a subset modulo n, Arturo Magidin, 13:13
Re: zero gradient surface-, Lee Rudolph, 13:13
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 13:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 12:57
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 12:54
Modular Algebra: Find number of elements of a subset modulo n, Dani Camps, 12:54
Endless iterations involving pi., fasttrack2a, 12:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 12:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 12:37
Re: zero gradient surface-, novis, 12:36
Re: A problem I cannot solve, mureika, 12:35
Re: idempotent functions, galathaea, 12:31
Q: infinite product, Gottfried Helms, 12:08
Re: A problem I cannot solve, anon5874, 11:48
Re: Functions that take sets of measure zero to sets of measure zero, TCL, 11:36
Re: Functions that take sets of measure zero to sets of measure zero, Jules, 11:32
How to find asymptotics of a solution of a Fredholm integral equation, ManOfLight, 11:31
Re: idempotent functions, Duncan Muirhead, 11:28
Re: Trig question, mitch, 11:24
Re: zero gradient surface-, JEMebius, 11:21
Re: Prolate surface area, David W . Cantrell, 11:20
Re: nice,erdos,can. math bull, Chip Eastham, 11:18
Re: Galileo's Paradox, stephen, 11:04
Re: Geometrical meaning of imaginary roots?, David W . Cantrell, 10:54
Re: Trig question, Bart Goddard, 10:52
Re: A problem I cannot solve, pschan, 10:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 10:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 10:28
Re: Question on ultraproducts, Chip Eastham, 10:24
A problem I cannot solve, pc171, 10:16
Re: Trig question, mitch, 10:15
Compact Operators on Banach Spaces, Volker Boie, 10:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 10:10
Re: Functions that take sets of measure zero to sets of measure zero, TCL, 10:09
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Richard Tobin, 10:08
Re: nice,erdos,can. math bull, Ashay Burungale, 09:51
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 09:46
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 09:43
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 09:41
Re: integral over bessel function, A N Niel, 09:38
Functions that take sets of measure zero to sets of measure zero, TCL, 09:23
Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Dik T. Winter, 09:09
Re: JSH: Use ratings, The Last Danish Pastry, 08:43
Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Harlan Messinger, 08:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:06
Re: Intergers modulus Computeroids, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:04
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Bob Kolker, 08:03
Re: zero gradient surface, Lee Rudolph, 07:38
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Richard Tobin, 07:20
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tonico, 07:11
Re: Galileo's Paradox, Peter van Liesdonk, 07:01
Re: analysis with rearrangement_, José Carlos Santos, 06:50
Galileo's Paradox, Six Letters, 06:35
analysis with difficult counter-example., mina_world, 06:20
Re: existence of soln, ays, 06:12
Re: hard ?, Jyrki Lahtonen, 06:12
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Albrecht, 05:43
analysis with rearrangement_, mina_world, 05:22
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Butch Malahide, 05:09
Re: hard ?, Derek Holt, 05:01
a question in change-of-measure..., Mike, 05:00
Intergers modulus Computeroids, William Elliot, 04:43
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Aatu Koskensilta, 04:37
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Proginoskes, 04:33
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Proginoskes, 04:31
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Butch Malahide, 04:29
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tonico, 04:24
Re: JSH: Use ratings, James Dolan, 04:09
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Albrecht, 04:06
Re: integral over bessel function, Han de Bruijn, 04:06
Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, Proginoskes, 03:43
this new SCIENCE KEY for computers Re: a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, a_plutonium, 03:43
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, Tim Peters, 03:39
Re: hard ?, Jyrki Lahtonen, 03:30
a new KEY, and, a symposium to revise all science symbols in order to make them accessible to computer Re:, a_plutonium, 03:22
Re: Generalization of Little's Theorem, brian . james . kirby, 03:19
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Tim Peters, 03:04
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 03:03
Re: Prime Number Theorem !?, Rupert, 02:59
Prime Number Theorem !?, Andrew Usher, 02:55
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Proginoskes, 02:50
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Proginoskes, 02:43
For God's sake!, Andrew Usher, 02:34
Re: The grandchildren..., Larry Hammick, 02:34
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Proginoskes, 02:29
R. Kiehn's "physical vacuum" and my "emergent gravity.", Jack Sarfatti, 01:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 01:36
Re: JSH: Use ratings, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:49
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, Yougurt Sugir, 00:37
Re: JSH: Use ratings, jstevh, 00:04

November 23, 2006

Re: JSH: Use ratings, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:57
Re: JSH: Use ratings, jstevh, 23:32
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 23:06
Re: Informal Infinity, Rupert, 23:04
Re: tensor product twister, Jannick Asmus, 22:42
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, William Elliot, 21:56
Re: tensor product twister, Jannick Asmus, 21:52
Re: The mathematics of poker, MD, 21:49
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Randy Poe, 21:47
Re: Informal Infinity, zuhair, 21:31
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 21:30
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Jesse F. Hughes, 21:27
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 21:21
zero gradient surface, novis, 21:21
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 21:12
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Rupert, 21:11
Re: Informal Infinity, Rupert, 21:10
Re: existence of soln, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:53
Informal Infinity, zuhair, 20:51
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 20:47
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 20:44
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 20:42
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 20:42
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 20:40
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Rupert, 20:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:39
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 20:34
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Lee Rudolph, 20:30
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Dr Mackeroy, 20:28
Re: Lenny Susskind's Oct 2006 Nature Physics paper, George Hammond, 20:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:25
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Dr Mackeroy, 20:21
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 20:12
Re: analysis with limit-, mina_world, 20:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:50
Re: tensor product twister, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx, 19:45
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Rupert, 19:39
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 19:36
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 19:34
Re: ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT DIATRIBE, J.S.Harris Fan, 19:08
Question on ultraproducts, Artyom, 18:59
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, J.S.Harris Fan, 18:47
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, Pouya D. Tafti, 18:46
Re: JSH: Use ratings, David T. Ashley, 18:33
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 18:33
Re: hard ?, Gerry Myerson, 18:27
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 18:25
Re: The mathematics of poker, Gerry Myerson, 18:25
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 18:19
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 18:10
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:58
Re: Planting a tree, Robert Israel, 17:50
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, Robert Cohen, 17:44
Re: Abel's Convergence Theorem exercise, anon5874, 17:33
Re: tensor product twister, Jannick Asmus, 17:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 17:05
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Tim Peters, 16:53
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, David T. Ashley, 16:50
Re: idempotent functions, cbrown, 16:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:47
Re: tensor product twister, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx, 16:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:33
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Tim Peters, 16:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:23
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, Dave Seaman, 16:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:16
Re: JSH: Use ratings, jstevh, 16:06
Re: Generalization of Little's Theorem, Robert Israel, 16:05
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Chris Menzel, 16:00
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Wilf . Rosenbaum, 15:58
Re: JSH: Use ratings, jstevh, 15:54
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Rupert, 15:48
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, jstevh, 15:46
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, Arturo Magidin, 15:37
Re: counter example in analysis, Virgil, 15:34
Re: existence of soln, Robert Israel, 15:33
Re: tensor product twister, Jannick Asmus, 15:33
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:33
Re: counter example in analysis, Virgil, 15:29
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, Tim Peters, 15:27
Re: integral over bessel function, Jacko, 15:23
Re: integral over bessel function, Jacko, 15:19
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 15:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, Jacko, 15:13
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Rupert, 15:04
Re: integral over bessel function, Robert Israel, 15:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 14:56
Re: existence of soln, ays, 14:55
existence of soln, ays, 14:53
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 14:49
Re: Abel's Convergence Theorem exercise, The World Wide Wade, 14:44
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Gib Bogle, 14:44
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, David T. Ashley, 14:43
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:42
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Gib Bogle, 14:41
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Math1723, 14:39
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 14:35
Re: The mathematics of poker, Math1723, 14:34
Re: analysis with limit-, The World Wide Wade, 14:32
Re: Simple financial math question: leasing/repayments formula, Nick, 14:32
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 14:32
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 14:26
Re: Use ratings, Uncle Zed, 14:22
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 14:20
Re: Why Regularity?, Math1723, 14:17
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 14:17
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Math1723, 14:11
Re: Simple financial math question: leasing/repayments formula, Nick, 14:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:10
Re: Planting a tree, Nick, 14:10
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 14:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:04
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 14:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 13:59
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 13:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 13:56
Re: complex analysis with harmonic., The World Wide Wade, 13:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 13:50
integral over bessel function, kilbinge, 13:31
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:23
Re: ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT DIATRIBE, Ross A. Finlayson, 13:20
Re: JSH: Use ratings, jstevh, 13:12
Re: Envelopping Surface [Was: Volume calculation of convex hulls], Thomas Mautsch, 13:07
Re: Volume calculation of convex hulls, Thomas Mautsch, 13:07
Re: Volume calculation of convex hulls, Thomas Mautsch, 13:07
Re: computing holograms, John Bailey, 13:03
Re: JSH: Use ratings, jstevh, 13:00
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 12:57
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 12:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 12:55
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 12:55
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 12:54
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 12:52
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 12:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 12:51
Re: complex analysis with harmonic., mina_world, 12:51
Re: tensor product twister, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx, 12:49
Re: JSH: Use ratings, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:49
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, Tim Peters, 12:26
Re: locally increasing everywhere implies globally increasing, Dave L. Renfro, 12:25
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 12:23
The mathematics of poker, Christian Bauer, 12:14
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Aatu Koskensilta, 12:13
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, David T. Ashley, 12:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 12:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 12:05
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, Dave L. Renfro, 12:03
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:56
Re: Just a question?, Dave L. Renfro, 11:48
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:45
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tonico, 11:36
classifying space for SU(N), pavel . boyko, 11:35
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:31
Re: Abel's Convergence Theorem exercise, anon5874, 11:23
what conditions are required, novis, 11:19
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 11:18
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:15
Re: hard ?, Ashay Burungale, 11:15
Re: tensor product twister, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx, 11:07
Re: Infinity Again, Albrecht, 10:56
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 10:54
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 10:49
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 10:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Albrecht, 10:33
Re: counter example in analysis, Eckard Blumschein, 10:33
[JSH] Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, David C . Ullrich, 10:28
Re: counter example in analysis, Eckard Blumschein, 10:27
Re: locally increasing everywhere implies globally increasing, David C . Ullrich, 10:25
Re: Landau inequality for function of several variables, David C . Ullrich, 10:11
Re: query on dual space of an l_p space, David C . Ullrich, 10:04
Re: tensor product twister, Jannick Asmus, 09:50
Re: Trig question, Bart Goddard, 09:46
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, J.S.Harris Fan, 09:45
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 09:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 09:17
Re: ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT DIATRIBE, J.S.Harris Fan, 09:14
Re: I want to know howto solve ax^2+bx = cy^2+dy (nonlinear diophantine equation), Helmut Richter, 09:06
Re: tensor product twister, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx, 08:59
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 08:40
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 08:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 08:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:23
Re: Having trouble getting started, John Schutkeker, 08:12
Re: ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT DIATRIBE, Tonico, 08:08
Re: Having trouble getting started, John Schutkeker, 08:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 08:05
I want to know howto solve ax^2+bx = cy^2+dy (nonlinear diophantine equation), None, 07:53
Re: complex analysis with harmonic., mina_world, 07:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 07:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 07:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:40
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Tim Peters, 07:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, Albrecht, 07:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:30
Re: discrete math with difficult party., mina_world, 07:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:16
Technology, red raider, 07:14
Re: complex analysis with harmonic., José Carlos Santos, 07:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:59
Re: Prolate surface area, George Orwell, 06:58
Re: complex analysis with harmonic., mina_world, 06:54
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Butch Malahide, 06:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:26
Re: ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT DIATRIBE, Ross A. Finlayson, 06:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 06:18
Re: orthogonality help, Daniel Mayost, 06:16
Re: discrete math with difficult party., mina_world, 06:12
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Richard Tobin, 06:01
Re: complex analysis with harmonic., Daniel Mayost, 05:59
ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT DIATRIBE, Ross A. Finlayson, 05:55
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Butch Malahide, 05:44
Re: Defining Natural Numbers, kunzmilan, 05:35
Generalization of Little's Theorem, brian . james . kirby, 05:33
Re: analysis with limit-, Ioannis, 05:22
Re: Calculating an average vector, kunzmilan, 05:03
Re: Trig question, mitch, 03:32
Re: discrete math with difficult party., mina_world, 03:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 03:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 03:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 03:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 03:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 03:07
Re: discrete math with difficult party., Proginoskes, 03:03
Re: tensor product twister, Jannick Asmus, 03:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 03:02
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Proginoskes, 02:58
Re: Trig question, Proginoskes, 02:55
Re: improving the alphabet and digits Re: math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, Proginoskes, 02:52
complex analysis with harmonic., mina_world, 02:52
Re: improving the alphabet and digits Re: math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, Proginoskes, 02:50
Re: analysis with limit-, anon5874, 02:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 02:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Ralf Bader, 02:04
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, David Bernier, 02:00
discrete math with difficult party., mina_world, 01:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:55
orthogonality help, vsgdp, 00:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 00:12
GOOGLE'S FREE SOFTWARE OFFER, sofcare, 00:00
analysis with limit-, mina_world, 00:00

November 22, 2006

Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 23:57
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Rupert, 23:55
Re: JSH: Use ratings, Wilf . Rosenbaum, 23:52
Re: Just a question?, William Elliot, 23:31
hilbert's nullstellensatz and tensor products of algebras, oferlock, 23:28
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 23:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 23:15
Re: Just a question?, zuhair, 23:12
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 23:03
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Gib Bogle, 23:02
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Gib Bogle, 23:01
Re: Simple financial math question: leasing/repayments formula, Daniel Mayost, 22:58
Re: improving the alphabet and digits Re: math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, Dik T. Winter, 22:54
Re: Abel's Convergence Theorem exercise, The World Wide Wade, 22:32
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 22:30
Simple financial math question: leasing/repayments formula, Wheezle, 22:17
Re: JSH: Use ratings, fishfry, 21:34
Re: help, Chilli Dog, 21:27
JSH: Use ratings, jstevh, 21:24
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Math1723, 21:18
help, Chilli Dog, 21:07
Re: three nonlinear equations, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:02
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Math1723, 21:00
Re: Having trouble getting started, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:35
Re: Probability question, Daniel Mayost, 20:18
Re: tensor product twister, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx, 20:12
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 20:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 19:50
Re: Having trouble getting started, Agent Smith, 19:37
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 19:22
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Rupert, 19:21
Abel's Convergence Theorem exercise, anon5874, 19:18
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 19:16
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 19:01
Re: p-Sylow subgroups of S_n, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:58
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 18:53
Re: Just a question?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:52
Re: Landau inequality for function of several variables, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:49
Re: Trig question, Bart Goddard, 18:48
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 18:40
Re: Having trouble getting started, Robert Israel, 18:31
Just a question?, zuhair, 18:28
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 18:25
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 18:24
Re: Planting a shade tree, Michael Harrington, 18:04
Re: idempotent functions, theronruiz, 18:03
Re: Trig question, mitch, 17:55
Re: when is a trend in a chart statistically significant?, 8usenet, 17:53
Re: idempotent functions, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:26
Probability question, grandslamforce, 17:23
Probability question, grandslamforce, 17:23
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 17:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:22
Re: Having trouble getting started, John Schutkeker, 17:20
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Rupert, 17:16
Re: p-Sylow subgroups of S_n, Arturo Magidin, 17:16
Re: Planting a tree, GARY, 17:09
Re: I want to be chelated, Mark & Steven Bornfeld, 17:04
Re: query on dual space of an l_p space, Arturo Magidin, 17:03
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, Dave L. Renfro, 16:57
Re: query on dual space of an l_p space, TCL, 16:56
p-Sylow subgroups of S_n, eugene, 16:51
The grandchildren..., The Last Danish Pastry, 16:46
Re: Planting a shade tree, Nick, 16:46
Re: Planting a tree, Nick, 16:44
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:40
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 16:40
Re: decimal longitude and latitude problem, Nick, 16:36
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, Jason Pawloski, 16:32
Re: dini derivatives, jennifer, 16:30
Re: (Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, Dave L. Renfro, 16:28
Planting a tree, GARY, 16:25
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 16:25
Re: locally increasing everywhere implies globally increasing, Butch Malahide, 16:25
Re: Trig question, Bart Goddard, 16:11
(Very Off Topic): Need Help With Linear Maps Question, Jason Pawloski, 16:07
Roots of a trinomial equation expressed in 2F1, Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen, 16:07
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 15:58
Re: harmonic numbers, rancid moth, 15:58
Re: Trig question, Ioannis, 15:49
Re: I want to be chelated, Michael Press, 15:48
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, sg552, 15:48
Re: Geometrical meaning of imaginary roots?, 131208, 15:45
Planting a shade tree, GARY, 15:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 15:29
Planting a shade tree, GARY, 15:23
Re: Prolate surface area, Narasimham, 15:17
Re: Are there functions, such that...?, galathaea, 15:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:08
Re: Normalizing the interval of integration of a rational function, Robert Israel, 15:08
Re: Trig question, Bart Goddard, 15:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:57
Re: Volume calculation of convex hulls, Narasimham, 14:54
Re: Convergence of series, Robert Israel, 14:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:47
Re: three nonlinear equations, mrdarrett, 14:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:45
Re: Trig question, Ioannis, 14:41
Re: three nonlinear equations, Robert Israel, 14:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:39
Re: Prolate surface area, David W . Cantrell, 14:37
Re: locally increasing everywhere implies globally increasing, Dave L. Renfro, 14:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 14:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 14:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:29
Prolate surface area, Anonymous, 14:29
Lost? here is your invite..., R.E.M.Z, 14:24
Triangle, Deep, 14:17
Triangle, Deep, 14:16
Triangle, Deep, 14:16
Re: Landau inequality for function of several variables, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 14:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:09
Re: dini derivatives, Robert Israel, 14:09
Intrinsic differential equation of conics, Narasimham, 14:09
Intrinsic differential equation of conics, Narasimham, 14:07
Intrinsic differential equation of conics, Narasimham, 14:05
Re: Trig question, David T. Ashley, 14:04
Re: Trig question, Badger, 14:04
Convergence of series, Jean Pierre MERX, 14:02
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Charlie-Boo, 13:49
Intrinsic differential equation of conics, Narasimham, 13:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:48
Intrinsic differential equations of conics, Narasimham, 13:42
Re: three nonlinear equations, Peter L. Montgomery, 13:40
Re: counter example in analysis, Virgil, 13:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:31
Re: counter example in analysis, Virgil, 13:29
Re: counter example in analysis, Virgil, 13:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:22
Re: counter example in analysis, Virgil, 13:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 13:15
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Virgil, 13:11
Landau inequality for function of several variables, novis, 13:11
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 13:09
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 13:08
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 13:05
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 13:03
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 12:58
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 12:48
Re: dini derivatives, jennifer, 12:46
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Virgil, 12:43
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Dave, 12:41
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 12:38
Re: Trig question, Ioannis, 12:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 12:22
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, David Moran, 12:02
Trig question, mitch, 12:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 12:00
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 11:50
Re: Number theory problem, Derek Holt, 11:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:45
Re: Volume calculation of convex hulls, Robert Israel, 11:39
Re: A question about knots, bob . papa . smurf, 11:39
Normalizing the interval of integration of a rational function, Cary, 11:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 11:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 11:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:10
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Jason Pawloski, 11:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 11:06
Re: three nonlinear equations, mrdarrett, 11:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 10:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 10:53
Re: Number theory problem, bigh2000, 10:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:37
Re: Emergent Gravity Debates 1, Sue..., 10:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:31
Re: query on dual space of an l_p space, Arturo Magidin, 10:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 10:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 10:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 10:13
Re: computing holograms, Calvin, 10:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 10:07
Re: computing holograms, Ed Prochak, 10:02
Re: three nonlinear equations, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 09:59
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 09:58
Re: metric space example, John Coleman, 09:40
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Georg Kreyerhoff, 09:35
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Lord Protector, 09:29
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:18
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, J.S.Harris Fan, 09:05
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:46
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:42
Re: Chi Square Goes to Normal Distribution, Reef Fish, 08:41
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:36
Re: idempotent functions, theronruiz, 08:36
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, William Hughes, 08:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 08:23
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Eckard Blumschein, 08:20
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Tim Peters, 08:17
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Eckard Blumschein, 07:56
Re: metric space example, Dave L. Renfro, 07:52
Re: counter example in analysis, Eckard Blumschein, 07:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:46
Re: counter example in analysis, Eckard Blumschein, 07:43
Re: counter example in analysis, Eckard Blumschein, 07:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 07:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:25
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:05
Re: counter example in analysis, Eckard Blumschein, 07:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:52
Re: function and gradient, David C . Ullrich, 06:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:45
Re: dini derivatives, David C . Ullrich, 06:45
Re: query on dual space of an l_p space, David C . Ullrich, 06:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 06:13
Re: Number theory problem, Derek Holt, 06:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 06:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 05:31
Re: Number theory problem, bigh2000, 05:29
Structure of Material Reality and Warp Drive StarGate Technology, Jack Sarfatti, 05:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Ross A. Finlayson, 04:10
Kibble's tetrads and spin connections from the Goldstone phases of the coherent vacuum, Jack Sarfatti, 03:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Ross A. Finlayson, 03:42
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Han de Bruijn, 03:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn, 03:22
Re: locally compact rings, Rupert, 03:15
Re: three nonlinear equations, mrdarrett, 03:09
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Proginoskes, 02:54
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Proginoskes, 02:51
Re: M(n,z) = Sum[G(m,z) / m^z ; m=0,...,n] = ?, Akira Bergman, 02:49
Vertex normal, curvature from point clouds, Feniks, 02:35
Re: dini derivatives, Michael Press, 02:30
Re: metric space example, Proginoskes, 02:25
Re: function and gradient, novis, 02:14
Re: locally compact rings, Tonico, 02:11
Re: function and gradient, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 02:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Heinz Mau, 02:00
Re: three nonlinear equations, mrdarrett, 01:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Heinz Mau, 01:59
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, jstevh, 01:58
function and gradient, novis, 01:57
Re: three nonlinear equations, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 01:54
Re: Having trouble getting started, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 01:37
three nonlinear equations, mrdarrett, 01:31
Re: harmonic numbers, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 01:13
Re: Having trouble getting started, Robert Israel, 01:03
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, J.S.Harris Fan, 00:57
Re: Emergent Gravity Debates 1, Larry Hammick, 00:42
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Rupert, 00:26
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 00:24
harmonic numbers, rancid moth, 00:14
Re: calculus with high school., David Marcus, 00:05
Debate on Emergent Gravity 6, Jack Sarfatti, 00:00

November 21, 2006

Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, sg552, 23:52
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:49
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Rupert, 23:46
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, jstevh, 23:22
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 23:19
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Geoff Harland, 23:08
Re: Z.Irregular Set Theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 23:01
Re: calculus with high school., mina_world, 22:59
$$ orthomodularism and quantum desiderata $ logic wars $$, galathaea, 22:52
Re: Emergent Gravity Debates 1, FrediFizzx, 22:49
Z.Irregular Set Theory, zuhair, 22:31
Re: metric space example, William Elliot, 22:29
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 22:22
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, 2b, 22:17
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 22:15
Debate on Emergent Gravity 4, Jack Sarfatti, 22:07
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, 2b, 22:05
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, Sweet Sugir, 22:00
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, no, 21:58
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, 2b, 21:51
Re: calculus with high school., Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:51
Re: Emergent Gravity Debates 1, Sue..., 21:44
Re: calculus with high school., mina_world, 21:26
Re: calculus with high school., David Marcus, 21:15
Re: bipartite graph problem, Proginoskes, 21:15
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Proginoskes, 21:10
Having trouble getting started, John Schutkeker, 21:00
Re: Number theory problem, Peter L. Montgomery, 20:57
calculus with high school., mina_world, 20:46
Re: query on dual space of an l_p space, The World Wide Wade, 20:41
Re: metric space example, Dave Rosoff, 20:16
Re: A quotation by Pafnuty Chebyshev, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 19:59
Re: metric space example, Jason Pawloski, 19:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 19:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 19:54
Re: a "reading radio" Re: math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, Stephen B., 19:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 19:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:38
Re: I AM SO HOT,COME AND GET ME:))), conradeaton, 19:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 19:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:20
Re: metric space example, vsgdp, 19:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 19:13
metric space example, vsgdp, 19:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:07
Re: Emergent Gravity Debates 1, FrediFizzx, 19:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 18:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 18:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:51
Re: Conformal structure explanation, Rupert, 18:47
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 18:45
Re: math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, Otto Bahn, 18:44
Re: Spherical cap set, bluelabel, 18:44
locally compact rings, Rupert, 18:41
Re: hi, gwh, 18:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 18:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 18:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 18:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 18:16
Re: computing holograms, Calvin, 18:08
Re: Balance problem, Michael Press, 18:06
Re: An unusual measurable set, Dave L. Renfro, 17:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe, 17:49
Re: math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, Nick Bensema, 17:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:41
dini derivatives, jennifer, 17:37
Re: computing holograms, Bob Kolker, 17:33
Re: bipartite graph problem, Gerry Myerson, 17:30
Re: SUM of f(x), Michael Press, 17:19
computing holograms, Ed Prochak, 17:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 16:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 16:38
Re: Volume calculation of convex hulls, Robert Israel, 16:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe, 16:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:19
Re: Strange math operation in a scientific journal, Arturo Magidin, 16:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:16
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 16:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 16:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:10
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 16:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:07
Spherical cap set, bluelabel, 16:06
Re: An unusual measurable set, The World Wide Wade, 16:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:05
Re: query on dual space of an l_p space, somethingfunner, 16:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:59
Re: Expected Value of the number of elements in an intersection of two random subsets of a set, Herman Rubin, 15:54
Re: query on dual space of an l_p space, Pouya D. Tafti, 15:53
Theoretical value, and what is the smallest alphabet possible for smallest language Re:, a_plutonium, 15:51
query on dual space of an l_p space, somethingfunner, 15:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:34
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 15:31
Re: gradient inverse, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 15:16
Re: Is this harmonic sum periodic ?-, JEMebius, 15:13
Re: George B. Thomas Jr., 92, Dies; Wrote Calculus Text, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 15:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:07
Number theory problem, bigh2000, 14:52
Modulo Mile, AttellYouWhat, 14:27
recurrence relations, Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen, 14:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 14:25
Re: Geometrical meaning of imaginary roots?, David W . Cantrell, 14:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:04
Re: Strange math operation in a scientific journal, Andrew, 13:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:42
Re: Logic problems - normal models of sets, David C. Ullrich, 13:41
Re: Directional derivative, The World Wide Wade, 13:35
Re: Directional derivative, The World Wide Wade, 13:33
Re: Strange math operation in a scientific journal, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:30
Debates on Emergent Gravity from Vacuum ODLRO 2, Jack Sarfatti, 13:30
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Gib Bogle, 13:28
Re: Strange math operation in a scientific journal, Arturo Magidin, 13:19
Re: Strange math operation in a scientific journal, A N Niel, 13:16
Re: Vitruvian Man & Golden Ratio, G. A. Edgar, 13:10
Re: Envelopping Surface [Was: Volume calculation of convex hulls], M.J.T. Guy, 13:09
Re: idempotent functions, A N Niel, 12:55
Re: Strange math operation in a scientific journal, Christopher J. Henrich, 12:54
Re: idempotent functions, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 12:53
Solution manual of some books..., recede, 12:52
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Michael Stemper, 12:47
Re: I AM SO HOT,COME AND GET ME:))), Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen, 12:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 12:12
idempotent functions, theronruiz, 11:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe, 11:48
Vitruvian Man & Golden Ratio, J. B. Wood, 11:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:20
Re: Geometrical meaning of imaginary roots?, Arturo Magidin, 11:06
Geometrical meaning of imaginary roots?, 131208, 11:01
Strange math operation in a scientific journal, Andrew, 10:43
Re: Conformal structure explanation, eugene, 10:35
Re: when is a trend in a chart statistically significant?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 10:32
Bernoulli Number Recursion Puzzle, Leroy Quet, 10:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe, 10:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 10:23
Subdivide, The Game, Leroy Quet, 10:21
Re: Arnold's Cat Map, dillogimp, 10:12
Re: Arnold's Cat Map, dillogimp, 10:03
Re: Emergent Gravity Debates 1, asimov, 09:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 09:49
Re: when is a trend in a chart statistically significant?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 09:43
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Dave, 09:43
Re: A quotation by Pafnuty Chebyshev, Tonico, 09:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Heinz Mau, 09:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Heinz Mau, 09:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 09:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 09:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 09:07
Re: when is a trend in a chart statistically significant?, Rod, 09:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 09:00
I AM SO HOT,COME AND GET ME:))), angelina_kurkova, 08:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 08:52
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 08:51
Arnold's Cat Map, dillogimp, 08:49
Re: when is a trend in a chart statistically significant?, 36645494, 08:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 08:45
Re: when is a trend in a chart statistically significant?, tonyjeffs, 08:44
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, no, 08:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 08:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 08:41
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, William Hughes, 08:39
Re: Algebra in Banach Space, David C . Ullrich, 08:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 08:24
Re: combinatorial sum, Rob Johnson, 08:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 08:00
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 07:50
Re: Algebra in Banach Space, A N Niel, 07:50
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 07:48
Re: A quotation by Pafnuty Chebyshev, Bob Kolker, 07:47
Re: A quotation by Pafnuty Chebyshev, Narasimham, 07:41
Re: math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, Peter T. Daniels, 07:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, Rainer Willis, 07:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Rainer Willis, 07:28
Re: JSH: So what's your school?, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:02
Re: when is a trend in a chart statistically significant?, Rod, 06:46
when is a trend in a chart statistically significant?, tonyjeffs, 06:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 04:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 04:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 04:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Heinz Mau, 03:45
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Tim Peters, 03:44
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 03:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 03:24
Re: combinatorial sum, maths . crazy, 03:21
Re: A quotation by Pafnuty Chebyshev, Tonico, 03:17
improving the alphabet and digits Re: math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, a_plutonium, 03:07
REQ: JSH's posts RE: Pioneer Anomaly Solution, Nickel Eye Tesla, 02:39
a "reading radio" Re: math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, a_plutonium, 02:38
Re: Volume calculation of convex hulls, David Bernier, 02:13
Re: SUM of f(x), RLG, 02:07
Re: math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, James "Kibo" Parry, 02:00
Re: math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, Proginoskes, 01:57
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 01:57
Re: need a theorem on the continuity of the expectation of a stochastic process..., Robert Israel, 01:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 01:52
Re: JSH: So what's your school?, Gib Bogle, 01:50
Re: bipartite graph problem, Proginoskes, 01:47
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Gib Bogle, 01:46
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Gib Bogle, 01:43
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Proginoskes, 01:43
Re: Generalization of Monthly problem 11245, Proginoskes, 01:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, Ralf Bader, 01:24
Re: Volume calculation of convex hulls, Robert Israel, 01:08
Re: math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, Greg Locock, 01:06
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, george, 01:06
Re: $$ orthomodularism and quantum desiderata $ logic wars $$, Fooled By Folksy Republicans, 01:00
is this problem tractable?, dillogimp, 00:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 00:49
Re: A quotation by Pafnuty Chebyshev, alex.lupas, 00:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe, 00:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, imaginatorium, 00:00

November 20, 2006

Re: Cantor Confusion, imaginatorium, 23:56
Emergent Gravity Debates 1, Jack Sarfatti, 23:50
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, no, 23:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 23:41
Re: Logic problems - normal models of sets, Zhu Guohun, 23:40
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Dik T. Winter, 23:28
Re: level sets?, Michael Press, 23:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 23:16
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 23:13
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 23:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:45
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tony Orlow, 22:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:30
Re: Volume calculation of convex hulls, David Bernier, 22:24
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 22:22
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 22:18
Re: CBS inequality, pdkarnik, 22:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:15
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 22:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:04
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 22:04
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 22:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 21:04
Re: Magic Square, Ken Pledger, 21:02
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 21:01
Re: Volume calculation of convex hulls, Robert Israel, 20:16
Re: Refutation of Waldyr Rodrigues's Archive Remarks on "Emergent Gravity", Ken S. Tucker, 19:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 19:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:24
Refuting Waldyr Rodrigues on "Emergent Gravity", Jack Sarfatti, 19:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 19:15
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 19:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 19:09
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, Robert Israel, 19:06
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 19:04
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 19:02
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 18:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:59
Algebra in Banach Space, Bill, 18:47
Re: Circumcircle testing in Barycentric Coordinates, Larry Hammick, 18:42
Re: Circumcircle testing in Barycentric Coordinates, Larry Hammick, 18:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, David R Tribble, 18:36
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 18:29
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 18:08
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:04
Re: SUM of f(x), Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen, 18:04
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:59
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:56
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:53
Re: Conformal structure explanation, Rupert, 17:50
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:46
Re: Conformal structure explanation, Rupert, 17:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 17:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:40
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:40
Re: What are these series called as?, Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen, 17:39
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:37
Re: Diophantine Problem, Isura, 17:35
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:34
Re: Diophantine Problem, Isura, 17:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:33
Re: Is this harmonic sum periodic ?, Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen, 17:32
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 17:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:28
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:27
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:19
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:15
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:11
Conformal structure explanation, eugene, 17:03
Re: OT: much or many, Virgil, 17:02
Re: Diophantine Problem, Gerry Myerson, 16:59
Re: bipartite graph problem, phsamuel, 16:58
Re: SUM of f(x), Gerry Myerson, 16:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:50
Re: bipartite graph problem, Gerry Myerson, 16:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:32
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, gjedwards, 16:24
Re: Linear Algebra: Inverse of an Upper Triangular Remain Upper Triangular, Robert Israel, 16:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:22
Re: algorithm for a*b/c with high accuracy using 32bit integers, Werner Lemberg, 16:05
Re: A silly question for experts in topology: What is the second homotopy group of O(4)/O(2)xO(2) ?, o_delor, 15:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 15:55
Re: Is this harmonic sum periodic ?, Robert Israel, 15:54
Re: A silly question for experts in topology: What is the second homotopy group of O(4)/O(2)xO(2) ?, o_delor, 15:47
Re: decimal longitude and latitude problem, David T. Ashley, 15:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:42
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Arturo Magidin, 15:24
Re: Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, David Bernier, 15:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:23
Re: conformal map from a square onto a rectangle, Robert Israel, 15:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:12
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, marcus_b, 15:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:08
bipartite graph problem, phsamuel, 15:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, imaginatorium, 15:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 14:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:51
Re: Multiple Permutation Generation, cbrown, 14:46
Re: hi, Tim Peters, 14:43
hi, ar . salihu, 14:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 14:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 14:35
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 14:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 14:28
Re: The Supermarket Paradigm, Virgil, 14:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 14:22
Re: Diophantine Problem, jseppa17@xxxxxxxxx, 14:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:13
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, Felix Rawlings, 14:10
Re: Countability of real numbers, Randy Poe, 14:10
Multiple Permutation Generation, rblaustein, 14:00
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Tim Peters, 13:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 13:43
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 13:41
Re: Countability of real numbers, David Marcus, 13:39
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:39
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, Math1723, 13:37
Re: is it possible for almost surely convergence and LP convergence to be equivalent?, Mike, 13:37
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 13:34
Re: Dice Odds Problem, David Marcus, 13:31
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 13:30
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 13:29
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 13:25
Re: SUM of f(x), Kira Yamato, 13:25
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 13:21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 13:20
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, marcus_b, 13:17
Re: Non Homogeneous partial differential equations, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:16
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 13:16
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 13:15
Circumcircle testing in Barycentric Coordinates, dang2015, 13:14
Balance problem, jseppa17@xxxxxxxxx, 13:13
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 13:11
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 13:08
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 13:07
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, David Marcus, 13:05
Refutation of Waldyr Rodrigues's Archive Remarks on "Emergent Gravity", Jack Sarfatti, 13:04
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, David Marcus, 13:03
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 12:57
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, David Marcus, 12:56
Re: counter example in analysis, David Marcus, 12:54
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tonico, 12:47
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tony Orlow, 12:47
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 12:44
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Arturo Magidin, 12:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:33
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Arturo Magidin, 12:32
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 12:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:28
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 12:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:23
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Randy Poe, 12:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:20
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 12:20
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 12:16
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Randy Poe, 12:12
Re: JSH: So what's your school?, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:11
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 12:10
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 12:07
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:05
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Georg Kreyerhoff, 12:04
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 12:03
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 12:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 12:01
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 12:00
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 11:52
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:51
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:49
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, marcus_b, 11:45
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Randy Poe, 11:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:35
Re: Diophantine Problem, Arturo Magidin, 11:30
Re: SUM of f(x), The Qurqirish Dragon, 11:29
Re: SUM of f(x), The Qurqirish Dragon, 11:28
Re: Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, Lord Protector, 11:28
Re: Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, Arturo Magidin, 11:25
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:24
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:22
Re: Boolean Ring ideals, A N Niel, 11:21
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, george, 11:21
Re: SUM of f(x), Jannick Asmus, 11:19
SUM of f(x), Brablo, 11:15
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Chris Menzel, 11:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:14
Re: combinatorial sum, Michael J�rgensen, 11:13
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Arturo Magidin, 11:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:06
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Arturo Magidin, 11:02
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 10:59
Re: Small set theory., Richard Harter, 10:57
Re: combinatorial sum, Mitch, 10:53
Re: Boolean Ring ideals, practice, 10:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:46
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 10:46
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, marcus_b, 10:45
Re: Boolean Ring ideals, A N Niel, 10:37
Re: Is this harmonic sum periodic ?, Dick, 10:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:34
Re: Is this harmonic sum periodic ?, A N Niel, 10:34
Re: A quotation by Pafnuty Chebyshev, G. Kramer, 10:27
Re: What are these series called as?, vreddyp, 10:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 10:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Sara M, 10:15
Re: Why Regularity?, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:13
Re: " sum 1 - 1/2 + 1/4 +1/8 -1/16 + 1/32 +1/64 +1/128 -1/256 + ...", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 10:12
Re: JSH: So what's your school?, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:03
Diophantine Problem, Gavin Brewer, 10:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:58
Re: Why Regularity?, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 09:54
Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, Peter T. Daniels, 09:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 09:52
Re: Why Regularity?, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:51
Re: What are these series called as?, José Carlos Santos, 09:51
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Jason Pawloski, 09:51
Re: JSH: So what's your school?, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:45
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Jason Pawloski, 09:44
Re: The Supermarket Paradigm, Han de Bruijn, 09:36
Is this harmonic sum periodic ?, Ikar, 09:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe, 09:27
Re: Linear Algebra: Inverse of an Upper Triangular Remain Upper Triangular, Victor Eijkhout, 09:24
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:24
A quotation by Pafnuty Chebyshev, Han de Bruijn, 09:23
What are these series called as?, vreddyp, 09:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:20
Re: Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:11
Re: Dice Odds Problem, Nick, 09:05
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:58
Re: Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, José Carlos Santos, 08:53
Re: The Supermarket Paradigm, drmwecker, 08:52
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:48
The Supermarket Paradigm, Han de Bruijn, 08:46
Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, Harlan Messinger, 08:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:38
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 08:35
Boolean Ring ideals, practice, 08:30
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Randy Poe, 08:25
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:18
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 08:09
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 08:02
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:59
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:54
Your #1 Work At Home Directory, Alam, 07:52
Veriuni Store!, Alam, 07:50
Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, Lord Protector, 07:49
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:48
Get FREE info pack of Home Job., Alam, 07:48
Earn US$ 2.00 per referral and 40% on product sale., Alam, 07:47
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 07:42
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, CapCity, 07:38
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:30
Re: Questioning certainty, David Moran, 07:14
Re: Dice Odds Problem, John Coleman, 07:04
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 07:01
Re: Hermitian Matrix Woes, Georg Kreyerhoff, 07:01
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:58
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:41
Hermitian Matrix Woes, Martin, 06:30
Re: Tessellation software, David W . Cantrell, 06:30
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:29
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:28
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 06:19
Re: counter example in analysis, Bob Kolker, 06:17
Re: is it possible for almost surely convergence and LP convergence to be equivalent?, David C . Ullrich, 06:16
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:11
TripleGrid Calculus, Han de Bruijn, 06:01
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 05:59
New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 20, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:50
Logic problems - normal models of sets, lacrimosalundin, 05:49
Re: OT: much or many, Eckard Blumschein, 05:44
Non Homogeneous partial differential equations, Gerald, 05:41
Re: lame joke, Hero, 05:40
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 05:33
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 05:31
Re: Generalization of Monthly problem 11245, Butch Malahide, 05:13
Re: counter example in analysis, Virgil, 04:51
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 04:47
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Virgil, 04:46
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Virgil, 04:45
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 04:43
math value and even computer commercial value Re: looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, a_plutonium, 04:34
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Virgil, 04:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 04:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 04:18
Re: Linear Algebra: Inverse of an Upper Triangular Remain Upper Triangular, Derek Holt, 04:16
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 04:14
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 04:10
looking for the Smallest Digital Cell that encapsulates the alphabet; like 8 encapsulates all numbers, a_plutonium, 04:04
Re: The Unity Problem, Hero, 04:03
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 04:02
Re: lame joke, Gottfried Helms, 03:56
BST tree, pawellepko, 03:54
Re: lame joke, Han de Bruijn, 03:47
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Eckard Blumschein, 03:46
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Eckard Blumschein, 03:45
Re: counter example in analysis, Eckard Blumschein, 03:43
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Rupert, 03:40
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 03:35
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Rupert, 03:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 03:01
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, Rupert, 03:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 02:59
need a theorem on the continuity of the expectation of a stochastic process..., Mike, 02:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 02:55
Re: JSH: Questioning certainty, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:50
Re: Calculating an average vector, Gottfried Helms, 02:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 02:46
Re: Small set theory., Virgil, 02:29
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, jstevh, 02:27
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, jstevh, 02:20
JSH: Questioning certainty, jstevh, 02:05
Re: JSH: Where is Christian Bau?, Tim Peters, 02:04
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 01:52
Re: An infinite debate, Eckard Blumschein, 01:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 01:49
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 01:49
Re: Small set theory., Eckard Blumschein, 01:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 01:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 01:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 01:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 01:36
Re: combinatorial sum, Proginoskes, 01:11
Re: Tessellation software, Proginoskes, 01:09
Re: Generalization of Monthly problem 11245, Proginoskes, 01:07
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Proginoskes, 01:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, imaginatorium, 01:00
Re: JSH: Where is Christian Bau?, Proginoskes, 00:59
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Bill Hale, 00:56
Re: Expected Value of the number of elements in an intersection of two random subsets of a set, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 00:34
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Gib Bogle, 00:33
Re: Expected Value of the number of elements in an intersection of two random subsets of a set, David Marcus, 00:32
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 00:27
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 00:18
Expected Value of the number of elements in an intersection of two random subsets of a set, Hassan Jameel, 00:04
Re: Linear Algebra: Inverse of an Upper Triangular Remain Upper Triangular, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:04
Re: decimal longitude and latitude problem, steve, 00:03

November 19, 2006

Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, sg552, 23:55
Re: Linear Algebra: Inverse of an Upper Triangular Remain Upper Triangular, Chris Smith, 23:52
combinatorial sum, maths . crazy, 23:44
JSH: is a McRib, Dr. Doctor, 23:42
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, marcus_b, 23:41
Re: Dice Odds Problem, Jeffery, 23:38
Re: Dice Odds Problem, Jeffery, 23:32
Re: Tessellation software, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:29
Re: algorithm for a*b/c with high accuracy using 32bit integers, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:24
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 23:20
Re: algorithm for a*b/c with high accuracy using 32bit integers, Peter L. Montgomery, 23:10
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, jstevh, 23:00
Re: algorithm for a*b/c with high accuracy using 32bit integers, David Marcus, 22:46
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, jstevh, 22:46
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 22:38
Re: Closed Bounded Set, David Marcus, 22:34
Re: The Unity Problem, David Marcus, 22:26
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 22:25
Re: Closed Bounded Set, Butch Malahide, 22:19
Re: 2nd order differential equations- non homogeneous, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 22:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 22:13
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 21:57
Re: Generalization of Monthly problem 11245, Butch Malahide, 21:54
Re: Maximise polynomial degree N, Chip Eastham, 21:54
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Rupert, 21:52
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Rupert, 21:51
Tessellation software, Meah, 21:44
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, David Moran, 21:32
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, jstevh, 21:28
Re: 2nd order differential equations- non homogeneous, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:26
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, jstevh, 21:22
Re: Linear Algebra: Inverse of an Upper Triangular Remain Upper Triangular, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:15
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 21:00
Re: Closed Bounded Set, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 20:55
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 20:52
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, J.S.Harris Fan, 20:48
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Randy Poe, 20:41
Re: 2nd order differential equations- non homogeneous, sshelto6, 20:39
Inverse Cascade?, John Schutkeker, 20:34
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, William Hughes, 20:34
Re: Closed Bounded Set, Virgil, 20:27
Re: Closed Bounded Set, Virgil, 20:20
Re: Closed Bounded Set, Kobu, 20:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:17
Re: Closed Bounded Set, David Marcus, 20:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 20:01
Re: Closed Bounded Set, Kobu, 19:59
Re: Closed Bounded Set, Virgil, 19:58
Re: 2nd order differential equations- non homogeneous, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:55
Re: The Unity Problem, Gib Bogle, 19:54
Re: Dice Odds Problem, David Marcus, 19:53
Re: 2nd order differential equations- non homogeneous, Virgil, 19:46
Re: Fourier Transform Detail, John Schutkeker, 19:33
Re: Closed Bounded Set, Daniel Mayost, 19:32
Closed Bounded Set, Kobu, 19:30
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, gjedwards, 19:28
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Randy Poe, 19:21
Re: number theory, Daniel Mayost, 19:16
Re: number theory, Rupert, 19:15
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, marcus_b, 19:07
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, zuhair, 19:00
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 18:52
Re: Dice Odds Problem, Nick, 18:52
Re: Linear Algebra: Inverse of an Upper Triangular Remain Upper Triangular, Daniel Mayost, 18:52
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 18:46
Re: Trying to obtain optimization paper, Nick, 18:43
Re: Volume calculation of convex hulls, Thomas Mautsch, 18:41
Re: Generalization of Monthly problem 11245, Thomas Mautsch, 18:41
Re: Fourier Transform Detail, Robert Israel, 18:37
Re: Fourier Transform Detail, Robert Israel, 18:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 18:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Michael Press, 18:31
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, David C . Ullrich, 18:30
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 18:25
Re: conformal map from a square onto a rectangle, David C . Ullrich, 18:22
number theory, champagne_101, 18:20
Re: conformal map from a square onto a rectangle, David C . Ullrich, 18:17
Linear Algebra: Inverse of an Upper Triangular Remain Upper Triangular, Wanshan Li, 18:16
Re: Generalization of Monthly problem 11245, Gerry Myerson, 18:08
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, Felix Rawlings, 18:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:05
Re: Are there functions f1(x) f2(x) f3(x), such that..., Gerry Myerson, 18:04
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 18:04
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, Bob Kolker, 17:58
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, Gib Bogle, 17:54
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, Gib Bogle, 17:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:53
Re: Z[sqrt(2)] not a field?, Gerry Myerson, 17:51
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Jason Pawloski, 17:49
Re: is it possible for almost surely convergence and LP convergence to be equivalent?, Mike, 17:49
Re: more NT, Gerry Myerson, 17:49
Re: is it possible for almost surely convergence and LP convergence to be equivalent?, Mike, 17:49
Re: is it possible for almost surely convergence and LP convergence to be equivalent?, Mike, 17:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:43
2nd order differential equations- non homogeneous, sshelto6, 17:43
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 17:42
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, marcus_b, 17:39
Re: Dice Odds Problem, Gerry Myerson, 17:37
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 17:35
Re: exotic proof of Heron's formula, Tonico, 17:34
Re: number Theory!, Gerry Myerson, 17:34
Re: JSH: Where in the world is Carmen San Diego ?, Rick Decker, 17:25
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Rupert, 17:25
Re: Trying to obtain optimization paper, OwlHoot, 17:24
Re: exotic proof of Heron's formula, Larry Hammick, 17:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Rupert, 17:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Re: Math as Religion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Re: Math as Religion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Re: JSH: Scary, eh?, Jason Pawloski, 17:19
Re: Calculating an average vector, Virgil, 17:16
Re: exotic proof of Heron's formula, Larry Hammick, 17:14
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Rupert, 17:09
Re: Scary, eh?, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:03
JSH: Scary, eh?, jstevh, 16:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:36
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 16:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:18
Re: Defining Natural Numbers, Herman Rubin, 16:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 16:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:11
Re: Probability using baye's theorem, David Marcus, 16:09
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 16:09
Trying to obtain optimization paper, pauldepstein, 16:04
Re: number Theory!, Daniel Mayost, 15:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:58
Re: Why Regularity?, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:56
Re: lusin's theorem, The World Wide Wade, 15:46
Probability using baye's theorem, Mad_man_on_a_MissIon, 15:46
Re: JSH: Where is Christian Bau?, christian.bau, 15:45
Re: Chi Square Goes to Normal Distribution, Herman Rubin, 15:42
number Theory!, champagne_101, 15:39
Re: JSH: Where in the world is Carmen San Diego ?, Chip Eastham, 15:29
Re: Why Regularity?, David Marcus, 15:19
Re: Fourier Transform Detail, John Schutkeker, 15:14
Re: Dice Odds Problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:08
Re: Calculating an average vector, Carlos Moreno, 15:06
Re: Dice Odds Problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:01
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 14:45
Re: Fourier Transform Detail, Robert Israel, 14:40
Re: Dice Odds Problem, Randy Poe, 14:36
Re: Dice Odds Problem, John Coleman, 14:29
Re: conformal map from a square onto a rectangle, Robert Israel, 14:28
Re: Dice Odds Problem, David Marcus, 14:27
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, marcus_b, 14:24
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 14:23
Re: Triangle area preserving => area preserving?, José Carlos Santos, 14:23
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Lord Protector, 14:18
Re: Are there functions, such that...?, Gottfried Helms, 14:17
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 14:16
Dice Odds Problem, Jeffery, 14:08
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 13:58
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, rich burge, 13:58
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 13:54
Re: f cts at b, f(b)<>0, exists neighbourhood b with f <> 0?, Arturo Magidin, 13:43
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 13:43
Re: Number Theory!, Arturo Magidin, 13:38
Re: Why Regularity?, Ross A. Finlayson, 13:27
Re: JSH: Where in the world is Carmen San Diego ?, Rick Decker, 13:24
Re: a^8+b^8+c^8+d^8 = e^8+f^8+g^8+h^8, christian.bau, 13:22
Re: Triangle area preserving => area preserving?, A N Niel, 13:19
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 13:08
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, jstevh, 13:05
Re: Calculating an average vector, Pouya D. Tafti, 13:03
Re: Why Regularity?, Ross A. Finlayson, 12:56
Re: Why Regularity?, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:55
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 12:29
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 12:20
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Lee Rudolph, 12:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:01
Re: matrix/vector transformation question, Florian Schmidt, 12:01
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, David Marcus, 11:55
Triangle area preserving => area preserving?, José Carlos Santos, 11:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:40
Re: matrix/vector transformation question, Randy Poe, 11:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 11:32
Re: Algebra & Normal Subgroups, i_have_narcoleptic_insomnia, 11:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 11:23
matrix/vector transformation question, Jonathan Wilson, 11:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 11:16
Re: Suffix language, Jussi Piitulainen, 11:13
Re: Algebra & Normal Subgroups, i_have_narcoleptic_insomnia, 11:06
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 11:02
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:54
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:42
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 10:39
Re: Maximise polynomial degree N, marmitage, 10:37
Re: the geodesic curvature is the rate of change ..., Hero, 10:32
Re: Algebra & Normal Subgropus, hagman, 10:28
Re: Kolker joins T_Wake in seeing the light., T Wake, 10:24
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 10:13
the geodesic curvature is the rate of change ..., Tuvak, 10:13
Calculating an average vector, Ricky Romaya, 10:09
Re: Kolker joins T_Wake in seeing the light., T Wake, 10:09
Re: A sequence question, TCL, 10:09
Suffix language, pgn, 10:09
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 10:08
Re: a^8+b^8+c^8+d^8 = e^8+f^8+g^8+h^8, Gerry, 09:56
Re: T_Wake finally gets it., T Wake, 09:53
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 09:44
A sequence question, TCL, 09:38
Algebra & Normal Subgropus, i_have_narcoleptic_insomnia, 09:33
A silly question for experts in topology: What is the second homotopy group of O(4)/O(2)xO(2) ?, iakkerman, 09:31
Re: problem in number theory, OwlHoot, 09:25
Re: Number Theory!, Larry Hammick, 09:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 09:23
Re: The Unity Problem, Hero, 09:19
Re: Maximise polynomial degree N, Chip Eastham, 09:18
Re: Regular expression, pgn, 09:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 08:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:26
conformal map from a square onto a rectangle, eugene, 08:20
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:11
Re: Regular expression, Helmut Richter, 08:01
Re: Calculate course from two points of Latitude / Longitude, Duncan Muirhead, 07:59
Re: " sum 1 - 1/2 + 1/4 +1/8 -1/16 + 1/32 +1/64 +1/128 -1/256 + ...", G. A. Edgar, 07:56
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 07:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:45
Regular expression, pgn, 07:40
Re: Kolker joins T_Wake in seeing the light., Phineas T Puddleduck, 07:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 07:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:19
algorithm for a*b/c with high accuracy using 32bit integers, Werner Lemberg, 06:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, imaginatorium, 06:43
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 06:19
Re: " sum 1 - 1/2 + 1/4 +1/8 -1/16 + 1/32 +1/64 +1/128 -1/256 + ...", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 06:18
Re: Number Theory!, Ulysse from CH, 06:01
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 05:37
Re: Number Theory!, A N Niel, 05:25
Re: Common points of f and f^{-1}, A N Niel, 05:20
Re: " sum 1 - 1/2 + 1/4 +1/8 -1/16 + 1/32 +1/64 +1/128 -1/256 + ...", G. A. Edgar, 05:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 04:54
Re: " sum 1 - 1/2 + 1/4 +1/8 -1/16 + 1/32 +1/64 +1/128 -1/256 + ...", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 04:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:24
Re: Volume calculation of convex hulls, Robert Israel, 04:04
Re: problem in number theory, Rupert, 04:02
Re: problem in number theory, Rupert, 03:59
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 03:55
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 03:39
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 03:37
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 03:36
Re: Common points of f and f^{-1}, José Carlos Santos, 03:33
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 03:33
Re: problem in number theory, Proginoskes, 03:12
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, David Marcus, 03:07
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, David Marcus, 03:04
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, David Marcus, 02:57
Re: problem in number theory, Rupert, 02:50
Re: A query about SVD, David Marcus, 02:33
Re: f cts at b, f(b)<>0, exists neighbourhood b with f <> 0?, Proginoskes, 02:29
Re: Common points of f and f^{-1}, Proginoskes, 02:27
Re: Maximise polynomial degree N, Proginoskes, 02:23
Re: 3 strict local maxima implies 2 local minima, Robert Israel, 02:19
Re: 3 strict local maxima implies 2 local minima, Proginoskes, 02:14
Re: Directional derivative, Proginoskes, 02:05
Re: problem in number theory, Proginoskes, 02:03
Re: Are there functions, such that...?, Proginoskes, 02:01
Re: Bayes decision boundary between 3 classes?, David Marcus, 01:59
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Proginoskes, 01:59
Re: f cts at b, f(b)<>0, exists neighbourhood b with f <> 0?, Chip Eastham, 01:55
Re: f cts at b, f(b)<>0, exists neighbourhood b with f <> 0?, Kira Yamato, 01:52
Mathematical Statistics, Raphael, 01:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 01:25
f cts at b, f(b)<>0, exists neighbourhood b with f <> 0?, Luke Wu, 01:12
Re: Generalization of Monthly problem 11245, Peter L. Montgomery, 00:41
Re: I don't understand this!, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, imaginatorium, 00:33
Re: Chi Square Goes to Normal Distribution, Reef Fish, 00:16
Number Theory!, champagne_101, 00:11

November 18, 2006

Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 23:53
Re: M(n,z) = Sum[G(m,z) / m^z ; m=1,...,n] = ?, Akira Bergman, 23:50
Re: Common points of f and f^{-1}, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 23:48
Common points of f and f^{-1}, grigkost, 23:42
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 23:41
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 23:14
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, David T. Ashley, 22:35
Kolker joins T_Wake in seeing the light., Jeff…Relf, 22:34
Re: Countability of real numbers, David Marcus, 22:25
Re: Countability of real numbers, David Marcus, 22:21
Re: Countability of real numbers, David Marcus, 22:15
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 22:04
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 21:55
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 21:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 21:38
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 21:31
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 21:29
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, Robert Cohen, 21:26
Re: The Unity Problem, David Marcus, 21:26
Re: I don't understand this!, David Marcus, 21:18
Fourier Transform Detail, John Schutkeker, 20:56
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 20:56
Re: Enveloping Surface [Was: Volume calculation of convex hulls], Thomas Mautsch, 20:56
Re: Generalization of Monthly problem 11245, Thomas Mautsch, 20:56
Re: JSH: So what's your school?, cbrown, 20:52
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, David Marcus, 20:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 20:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 20:35
Re: Calculate course from two points of Latitude / Longitude, Kaimbridge, 20:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 20:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe, 20:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 20:24
Maximise polynomial degree N, marmitage, 20:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 20:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 20:19
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 20:14
3 strict local maxima implies 2 local minima, eyyochen, 20:12
Re: JSH: Where is Christian Bau?, Tim Peters, 20:00
Re: Spatial time is a harder fact than the speed of light., Bob Kolker, 19:57
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, Michael Press, 19:51
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, Michael Press, 19:47
Re: CB: James Harris, you are own3d, Tim Peters, 19:39
Re: T_Wake finally gets it., Phineas T Puddleduck, 19:38
T_Wake finally gets it., Jeff…Relf, 19:37
Re: Exponentation, Michael Press, 19:32
Re: inequality, david petry, 19:31
Re: inequality, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 19:13
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 19:12
Re: inequality, alex.lupas, 19:12
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 18:41
Re: inequality, Peter L. Montgomery, 18:40
Re: Calculate course from two points of Latitude / Longitude, Hero, 18:40
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 18:36
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 18:26
inequality, novis, 18:24
Re: Directional derivative, Virgil, 18:18
Re: Why Regularity?, Virgil, 18:13
Calculate course from two points of Latitude / Longitude, spshaffer, 18:10
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 18:06
Directional derivative, Kenneth Bull, 18:05
Re: help solving trig problem, TFTAJLLYMXZP, 18:01
Re: Z[sqrt(2)] not a field?, Peter L. Montgomery, 17:57
convolution of piecewise periodic function, Dejfson, 17:55
Re: An unusual measurable set, TCL, 17:55
Re: The Unity Problem, Hero, 17:53
Re: Spatial time is a harder fact than the speed of light., T Wake, 17:51
Re: Z[sqrt(2)] not a field?, SamIam, 17:51
Re: JSH: Where in the world is Carmen San Diego ?, Chip Eastham, 17:50
Re: Z[sqrt(2)] not a field?, Arturo Magidin, 17:46
Re: The Unity Problem, Hero, 17:42
more NT, champagne_101, 17:41
Re: Z[sqrt(2)] not a field?, Rupert, 17:39
Re: Z[sqrt(2)] not a field?, SamIam, 17:33
Re: Z[sqrt(2)] not a field?, Timothy Murphy, 17:27
Re: Isotherms in a unit circle with equation x^2+y^2<1 or =1, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 17:26
Re: Spatial time is a harder fact than the speed of light., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:23
Z[sqrt(2)] not a field?, SamIam, 17:20
Re: Countability of real numbers, David Marcus, 17:20
Re: Spatial time is a harder fact than the speed of light., Eric Gisse, 17:19
Re: Isotherms in a unit circle with equation x^2+y^2<1 or =1, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 17:17
Re: problem in number theory, champagne_101, 17:16
Re: counter example in analysis, David Marcus, 17:13
Re: counter example in analysis, David Marcus, 17:10
Re: Spatial time is a harder fact than the speed of light., Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:08
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 17:08
Re: JSH: So what's your school?, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:06
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 17:06
Spatial time is a harder fact than the speed of light., Jeff…Relf, 17:02
Re: MathCAD problem need help please, rz, 17:02
Re: problem in number theory, gtsavdar, 17:02
Re: problem in number theory, Rupert, 17:00
Re: Simplicity of PSL(2,q), Timothy Murphy, 16:58
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 16:58
Re: Chi Square Goes to Normal Distribution, Old Mac User, 16:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:54
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Gib Bogle, 16:53
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 16:52
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 16:50
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 16:47
Re: Are there functions, such that...?, galathaea, 16:44
Re: Simplicity of PSL(2,q), Timothy Murphy, 16:41
problem in number theory, champagne_101, 16:39
Re: Defining Natural Numbers, Virgil, 16:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 16:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:23
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 16:18
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 16:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 16:01
Re: What Do Muslims Believe about Jesus?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:55
What Do Muslims Believe about Jesus?, aadam979, 15:49
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 15:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 15:49
Mathsoft's licensing, grr.., rz, 15:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 15:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 15:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 15:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 15:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 15:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 15:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 15:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 15:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 15:14
Re: JSH: Where in the world is Carmen San Diego ?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:11
Re: The truth about Set theory, george, 15:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 15:01
quadratic variation of log price process, smart0072000in, 15:00
Re: Are there functions, such that...?, operator jay, 14:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:52
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:51
Re: JSH: Where in the world is Carmen San Diego ?, J.S.Harris Fan, 14:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 14:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:42
Re: Isotherms in a unit circle with equation x^2+y^2<1 or =1, Narasimham, 14:39
Re: An unusual measurable set, The World Wide Wade, 14:36
Re: Isotherms in a unit circle with equation x^2+y^2<1 or =1, Narasimham, 14:35
Re: Isotherms in a unit circle with equation x^2+y^2<1 or =1, Narasimham, 14:30
Re: Isotherms in a unit circle with equation x^2+y^2<1 or =1, Narasimham, 14:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 14:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 14:25
Re: notation for natural numbers, David Marcus, 14:18
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, David Marcus, 14:17
Re: The Unity Problem, Hero, 14:08
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, David Marcus, 13:58
Re: CB: James Harris, you are own3d, Gib Bogle, 13:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 13:44
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, marcus_b, 13:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 13:37
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, marcus_b, 13:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:35
Re: All numbers are virtual., unsettled, 13:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 13:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 13:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 13:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 13:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 13:30
Re: CB: James Harris, you are own3d, Justin, 13:29
Re: All numbers are virtual., Phineas T Puddleduck, 13:28
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 13:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 13:23
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, jstevh, 13:16
Re: Chi Square Goes to Normal Distribution, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:16
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, cognac756, 13:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 13:13
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 13:12
Re: Chi Square Goes to Normal Distribution, Daniel Mayost, 13:10
Re: Defining Natural Numbers, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:04
Chi Square Goes to Normal Distribution, Jonas, 13:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 13:02
Re: Convolution ???, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:00
Re: Convolution ???, Daniel Mayost, 12:58
Re: The Unity Problem, Hero, 12:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:56
Re: Convolution ???, Gottfried Helms, 12:54
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, David Moran, 12:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:50
Re: Time and time again, over all of recorded history..., T Wake, 12:50
Re: All numbers are virtual., T Wake, 12:48
Re: CB: James Harris, you are own3d, Rupert, 12:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:42
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 12:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:30
Convolution ???, Gottfried Helms, 12:28
Re: independant familly of polynomial, Daniel Mayost, 12:26
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 12:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:22
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 12:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:10
Re: Need help with Abel's convergence theorem, anon5874, 12:07
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 12:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:04
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 12:04
Re: Defining Natural Numbers, bert, 12:03
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 12:01
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, zuhair, 11:59
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 11:58
Re: An unusual measurable set, Jules, 11:53
Re: An unusual measurable set, A N Niel, 11:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 11:46
Re: integration over a levelset surface, novis, 11:45
Re: integration over a levelset surface, novis, 11:43
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, jstevh, 11:38
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 11:36
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 11:28
Re: CB: James Harris, you are own3d, jstevh, 11:28
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 11:27
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, J.S.Harris Fan, 11:19
Re: Probability and infinity, Mike Kelly, 11:00
Re: Defining Natural Numbers, Rupert, 10:53
Re: Why Regularity?, Rupert, 10:51
Re: Defining Natural Numbers, pradyumna . achar, 10:46
An unusual measurable set, TCL, 10:45
Re: Simplicity of PSL(2,q), Derek Holt, 10:42
Re: Defining Natural Numbers, Rupert, 10:20
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 10:17
Re: Z.Ulternative Set Theory, zuhair, 10:07
Re: Are there functions f1(x) f2(x) f3(x), such that..., Chip Eastham, 09:40
Re: Need help with Abel's convergence theorem, David C . Ullrich, 09:25
Re: I don't understand this!, Tonico, 09:12
Re: I don't understand this!, Pouya D. Tafti, 09:12
Re: Time and time again, over all of recorded history..., Phineas T Puddleduck, 09:02
Defining Natural Numbers, pradyumna . achar, 08:59
Re: I don't understand this!, hsxhua001, 08:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:42
Re: probability question, andreas, 08:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:25
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 08:21
Re: Probability and infinity, Rupert, 08:05
Probability and infinity, No Way, 07:49
Re: JSH: Where is Christian Bau?, christian.bau, 07:32
CB: James Harris, you are own3d, christian.bau, 07:24
Re: Liouvilles formula, Narasimham, 07:05
Re: Liouvilles formula, Narasimham, 07:04
Re: irreducible polynomial of degree 5., William Elliot, 07:00
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:38
Re: looking for a couple of formulas, Rob Johnson, 06:33
probabilistic model for p_i (mod 3) and entropy, David Bernier, 06:33
irreducible polynomial of degree 5., Tuvak, 06:28
Re: Z.Ulternative Set Theory, smn, 06:20
independant familly of polynomial, Fedor, 06:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 06:01
Re: Generalization of Monthly problem 11245, Phil Carmody, 04:36
Re: Are there functions f1(x) f2(x) f3(x), such that..., dillogimp, 04:31
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 04:17
Time and time again, over all of recorded history..., Jeff…Relf, 04:05
Re: looking for a couple of formulas, Larry Hammick, 03:27
Re: a^8+b^8+c^8+d^8 = e^8+f^8+g^8+h^8, titus_piezas, 03:23
Re: simplifying brackets, Proginoskes, 03:18
Re: simplifying brackets, Virgil, 03:11
Re: integration over a levelset surface, Jannick Asmus, 03:11
Re: Simplicity of PSL(2,q), Jannick Asmus, 03:08
Re: An infinite debate, Tonico, 02:55
Re: probability question, Proginoskes, 02:50
Re: Are there functions, such that...?, Proginoskes, 02:45
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, Proginoskes, 02:44
Re: simplifying brackets, Proginoskes, 02:40
Re: Generalization of Monthly problem 11245, Proginoskes, 02:37
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, J.S.Harris Fan, 02:36
probability question, andreas, 02:30
Re: Are there functions, such that...?, operator jay, 01:07
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, Tim Peters, 00:59
Re: Why Regularity?, zuhair, 00:54
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, J.S.Harris Fan, 00:43
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 00:42
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, Bob Kolker, 00:31
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, zuhair, 00:21
Re: Are there functions, such that...?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 00:20
Re: Isotherms in a unit circle with equation x^2+y^2<1 or =1, ronin_iyo, 00:20
Why Regularity?, zuhair, 00:15
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:02

November 17, 2006

Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, J.S.Harris Fan, 23:51
Re: All numbers are virtual., Bob Kolker, 23:49
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, Bob Kolker, 23:48
Isotherms in a unit circle with equation x^2+y^2<1 or =1, bottomline, 23:35
Re: Are there functions f1(x) f2(x) f3(x), such that..., Chip Eastham, 23:18
Need help with Abel's convergence theorem, anon5874, 23:16
Re: Are there functions f1(x) f2(x) f3(x), such that..., William Elliot, 22:51
Re: Are there functions f1(x) f2(x) f3(x), such that..., Kira Yamato, 22:49
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, J.S.Harris Fan, 22:35
Re: All numbers are virtual., unsettled, 22:22
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, zuhair, 22:19
Re: All numbers are virtual., Phineas T Puddleduck, 22:16
All numbers are virtual., Jeff…Relf, 22:14
Re: Are there functions f1(x) f2(x) f3(x), such that..., dillogimp, 22:12
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, zuhair, 22:11
Re: Are there functions f1(x) f2(x) f3(x), such that..., Daniel Mayost, 22:04
Re: Are there functions f1(x) f2(x) f3(x), such that..., dillogimp, 21:53
Re: Are there functions f1(x) f2(x) f3(x), such that..., Daniel Mayost, 21:36
Re: matrix and graph theory, Chip Eastham, 21:31
Re: simplifying brackets, G Patel, 21:29
Are there functions f1(x) f2(x) f3(x), such that..., dillogimp, 21:26
Are there functions f1(x) f2(x) f3(x), such that..., dillogimp, 21:23
Are there functions, such that...?, dillogimp, 21:21
Generalization of Monthly problem 11245, Peter L. Montgomery, 21:13
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, Tim Peters, 20:54
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, Bob Kolker, 20:47
Re: The truth about Set theory, Rupert, 20:41
Re: The truth about Set theory, Rupert, 20:38
Re: simplifying brackets, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:37
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, David T. Ashley, 20:30
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, cognac756, 20:27
simplifying brackets, patrol_boat, 20:25
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, sg552, 20:22
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, Tim Peters, 20:04
Re: Question - squares that are triangle numbers, Don Del Grande, 19:57
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, Bob Kolker, 19:56
Re: How can I solve negative factorial that now i am sending with this title?, Michael Press, 19:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 19:28
Re: Property of a triangle, maky m., 19:20
Re: " sum 1 - 1/2 + 1/4 +1/8 -1/16 + 1/32 +1/64 +1/128 -1/256 + ...", Daniel Mayost, 19:11
Simplicity of PSL(2,q), Timothy Murphy, 19:06
Re: JSH: Where in the world is Carmen San Diego ?, Dr. Doctor, 19:04
Re: Z.Ulternative Set Theory, zuhair, 18:55
Re: lame joke, Virgil, 18:52
Re: p and p^2 + 2 prime => p^3 + 4 prime, Virgil, 18:50
Re: The truth about Set theory, Virgil, 18:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:40
Re: Z.Ulternative Set Theory, zuhair, 18:35
Re: integration over a levelset surface, Daniel Mayost, 18:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 18:04
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, Jon Slaughter, 18:02
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, Jon Slaughter, 18:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, David R Tribble, 17:49
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 17:47
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 17:28
Re: Splitting field and Galois group = S_n, eugene, 17:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:17
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, Virgil, 17:11
Re: Z.Ulternative Set Theory, smn, 17:07
Re: Kids and Math, David Moran, 17:06
Re: Splitting field and Galois group = S_n, Arturo Magidin, 17:02
Re: Small set theory., Virgil, 17:02
Re: Small set theory., Virgil, 16:59
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:55
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 16:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 16:51
Re: Splitting field and Galois group = S_n, eugene, 16:49
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:41
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Virgil, 16:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:37
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, 131208, 16:35
Re: Ode on A Grecian Urn?, Stuart Leichter, 16:34
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Virgil, 16:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:27
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, Michael Press, 16:27
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 16:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:24
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 16:19
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 16:16
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 16:13
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 16:07
Re: p and p^2 + 2 prime => p^3 + 4 prime, Michael Press, 16:06
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 16:03
Ode on A Grecian Urn?, Prisoner at War, 15:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, David R Tribble, 15:46
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 15:41
Re: p and p^2 + 2 prime => p^3 + 4 prime, Michael Press, 15:40
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 15:37
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 15:34
Re: Kids and Math, David R Tribble, 15:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:33
Re: Splitting field and Galois group = S_n, Arturo Magidin, 15:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:26
Splitting field and Galois group = S_n, eugene, 15:21
Re: lame joke, David R Tribble, 15:18
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Michael Press, 15:15
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 15:14
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:13
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:10
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Michael Press, 15:09
Re: Bessel function Y, A N Niel, 15:00
Re: Something for sci.math's amateur mathematicians? (Part 2), Dave L. Renfro, 14:56
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:54
Re: is it possible for almost surely convergence and LP convergence to be equivalent?, Herman Rubin, 14:51
Re: Proof of a Theorem by R.M. Young, Han . deBruijn, 14:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:50
Re: The truth about Set theory, zuhair, 14:50
Z.Ulternative Set Theory, zuhair, 14:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:37
Re: xlog x bounded?, Michael Press, 14:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:36
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 14:33
Bessel function Y, mrdarrett, 14:29
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:28
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:23
Re: Not a Mensa fan, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:16
Re: The truth about Set theory, zuhair, 14:15
Re: Proof of a Theorem by R.M. Young, Rob Johnson, 14:06
" sum 1 - 1/2 + 1/4 +1/8 -1/16 + 1/32 +1/64 +1/128 -1/256 + ...", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 14:05
Re: Closed and open sets, Michael Stemper, 13:58
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 13:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 13:50
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, Chris Menzel, 13:40
Re: lame joke, Michael Stemper, 13:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe, 13:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:28
Re: Not a Mensa fan, sg552, 13:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:11
integration over a levelset surface, novis, 13:05
Re: analysis with series_, mina_world, 13:04
Re: sin(1/2)x vs. sin (pi/2)x, The Last Danish Pastry, 12:57
Re: A limit stumper, Herman Rubin, 12:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 12:51
Re: lame joke, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 12:35
Re: is it possible for almost surely convergence and LP convergence to be equivalent?, Robert Israel, 12:25
Re: a^8+b^8+c^8+d^8 = e^8+f^8+g^8+h^8, Gerry, 12:24
Re: sin(1/2)x vs. sin (pi/2)x, Sara M, 12:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 12:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:57
Relaxation oscillations?, pApAk, 11:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:55
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, mathisart, 11:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:53
Re: lame joke, Rainer Rosenthal, 11:53
Re: Group of order p^n, bluelabel, 11:50
Re: Who is Jesus Christ, Bob Kolker, 11:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, Tony Orlow, 11:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Tony Orlow, 11:25
Re: Help "Come up with suitable operations to make the set {0,1,2} a Field.", Chip Eastham, 11:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Tony Orlow, 11:15
Re: The truth about Set theory, george, 11:07
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, Randy Poe, 10:59
Re: The truth about Set theory, george, 10:55
Re: Not a Mensa fan, David T. Ashley, 10:54
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, george, 10:52
Re: a question about 4 colorings, mathisart, 10:44
Re: analysis with series_, José Carlos Santos, 10:30
Re: Help "Come up with suitable operations to make the set {0,1,2} a Field.", gnap, 10:29
Re: Group of order p^n, Arturo Magidin, 10:14
Re: analysis with series_, mina_world, 10:14
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 10:08
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 10:05
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 10:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 09:55
Re: Closed and open sets, Ulysse from CH, 09:51
Re: Closed and open sets, Ulysse from CH, 09:51
Re: lusin's theorem, Dave L. Renfro, 09:48
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, Jonathan Hoyle, 09:43
Allocation system problem, korfnick, 09:22
Re: Closed and open sets, lapiz, 09:07
Re: An infinite debate, Tonico, 09:05
Re: lame joke, Rod, 08:59
Re: Countability of real numbers, Albrecht, 08:54
Re: Countability of real numbers, Albrecht, 08:49
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, J.S.Harris Fan, 08:39
Re: Countability of real numbers, Randy Poe, 08:38
Closed and open sets, Michael Stemper, 08:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:29
Re: An infinite debate, Albrecht, 08:23
Re: is it possible for almost surely convergence and LP convergence to be equivalent?, David C . Ullrich, 08:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:55
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 07:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:49
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 07:35
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 07:31
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 07:28
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 07:25
Re: Ray inside a cone., Narasimham, 07:24
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 07:14
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 07:14
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 07:13
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, David C . Ullrich, 07:04
Re: Eigen values of a non-square matrix, kunzmilan, 06:51
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 06:49
Re: analysis with series_, José Carlos Santos, 06:44
Re: sin(1/2)x vs. sin (pi/2)x, Randy Poe, 06:42
Re: sin(1/2)x vs. sin (pi/2)x, Badger, 06:33
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 05:50
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 05:43
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, Geoff Harland, 05:30
Who is Jesus Christ, aadam979, 05:27
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 05:15
The crosssection of the sevendimensional plane simplex, kunzmilan, 05:11
Re: The truth about Set theory, abo, 05:06
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Eckard Blumschein, 05:04
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Eckard Blumschein, 04:54
Re: Pascal Distribution and Expectation Values, Taria, 04:51
Re: notation for natural numbers, Larry Hammick, 04:47
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, Proginoskes, 04:43
Re: sin(1/2)x vs. sin (pi/2)x, sean_in_cali, 04:39
Re: Pascal Distribution and Expectation Values, Taria, 04:34
Re: notation for natural numbers, Derek Holt, 04:13
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, kunzmilan, 04:04
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, W. Dale Hall, 03:59
Re: matrix and graph theory, brian . james . kirby, 03:57
Re: homeomorphic to a subset of R, W. Dale Hall, 03:55
exotic proof of Heron's formula, Larry Hammick, 03:50
Re: An infinite debate, Eckard Blumschein, 03:37
Re: sin(1/2)x vs. sin (pi/2)x, Proginoskes, 03:32
analysis with series_, mina_world, 03:17
sin(1/2)x vs. sin (pi/2)x, sean_in_cali, 03:09
Re: Small set theory., Eckard Blumschein, 03:01
Re: Small set theory., Eckard Blumschein, 02:58
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, Tim Peters, 02:45
Re: Help w/ Log335 homework, Proginoskes, 02:39
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 02:38
Re: Zeta Distribution and Pareto Distribution, kunzmilan, 02:22
Re: The truth about Set theory, Virgil, 02:12
Re: The truth about Set theory, Rupert, 02:08
Re: Group of order p^n, bluelabel, 02:07
Re: The truth about Set theory, Virgil, 01:58
Re: Help w/ Log335 homework, Proginoskes, 01:56
Re: The truth about Set theory, Virgil, 01:55
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 01:55
Re: Solution of an equation, Proginoskes, 01:50
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, Tim Peters, 01:24
is it possible for almost surely convergence and LP convergence to be equivalent?, Mike, 01:21
Re: JSH: Where in the world is Carmen San Diego ?, J.S.Harris Fan, 01:15
Help w/ Log335 homework, hereticmonkey, 01:10
lame joke, dillogimp, 01:03
Re: JSH: Where is Christian Bau?, Gib Bogle, 00:18
Re: Group of order p^n, Kira Yamato, 00:13
Re: The truth about Set theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:11
Re: xlog x bounded?, Michael Press, 00:05
Re: Group of order p^n, Gerry Myerson, 00:05
Re: The truth about Set theory, zuhair, 00:04

November 16, 2006

Re: I don't understand this!, Brian, 23:55
Re: The truth about Set theory, zuhair, 23:50
Re: I don't understand this!, junjy007, 23:30
Re: The truth about Set theory, zuhair, 23:27
Re: The truth about Set theory, zuhair, 23:25
Re: I don't understand this!, J.S.Harris Fan, 23:24
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 23:23
Group of order p^n, bluelabel, 23:22
Re: I don't understand this!, alzeih, 23:06
Re: I don't understand this!, alzeih, 22:54
Re: The truth about Set theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:44
Solution of an equation, Mike, 22:34
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 22:25
Re: I don't understand this!, Randy Poe, 22:19
Re: The truth about Set theory, Rupert, 22:06
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jonathan Hoyle, 22:02
Re: JSH: Where is Christian Bau?, Jesse F. Hughes, 22:00
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 21:37
Re: JSH: Where is Christian Bau?, gjedwards, 21:28
Re: decimal longitude and latitude problem, jack, 21:25
Re: JSH: Where is Christian Bau?, Proginoskes, 21:21
Re: Not a Mensa fan, Proginoskes, 21:19
Re: I don't understand this!, jack, 21:19
Re: JSH: Where is Christian Bau?, Tim Peters, 21:17
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, Proginoskes, 21:12
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, Tim Peters, 21:11
Re: Naive coding, Proginoskes, 21:08
Re: Arrgghh -- Semantics and "Mathematical Homonyms" (Watts on second?), Nick, 21:07
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, jstevh, 21:03
Re: Where is Christian Bau?, Dr. Doctor, 21:00
Re: JSH: Where is Christian Bau?, sg552, 20:57
Re: JSH:Where is Christian Bau?, David Moran, 20:53
Re: Not a Mensa fan, jstevh, 20:48
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 20:46
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 20:42
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, sg552, 20:39
Re: Convergent series, The World Wide Wade, 20:38
JSH: Where is Christian Bau?, jstevh, 20:38
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 20:37
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, jstevh, 20:27
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 20:21
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 20:19
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 20:15
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 20:13
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, jstevh, 20:13
Re: Liouvilles formula, Tuvak, 20:06
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, David Bernier, 19:59
Re: Question - squares that are triangle numbers, Gerry Myerson, 19:55
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 19:53
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 19:49
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 19:48
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 19:36
general ratio test, rancid moth, 19:35
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 19:34
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 19:28
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 19:25
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 19:22
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 19:20
Re: Are ((b/a)^(1/(a-1)))^a and (b/a)^(a/(a-1)) the same thing?, Robert Israel, 19:15
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus, 19:15
Question - squares that are triangle numbers, Don Del Grande, 19:14
Re: To simplify a product of 16 sines in 5 variables, Thomas Mautsch, 19:07
Re: Envelopping Surface [Was: Volume calculation of convex hulls], Thomas Mautsch, 19:07
Re: Euler Function, Thomas Mautsch, 19:07
Re: notation for natural numbers, David Marcus, 19:03
Re: xlog x bounded?, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 19:01
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, David Marcus, 19:00
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, David Marcus, 18:56
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 18:56
Re: Are ((b/a)^(1/(a-1)))^a and (b/a)^(a/(a-1)) the same thing?, Ioannis, 18:42
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, Jack Campin - bogus address, 18:40
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 18:35
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 18:34
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 18:33
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 18:31
Re: Are ((b/a)^(1/(a-1)))^a and (b/a)^(a/(a-1)) the same thing?, Michael, 18:29
Re: Naive coding, David Moran, 18:28
Re: More fun this way?, David Moran, 18:24
Are ((b/a)^(1/(a-1)))^a and (b/a)^(a/(a-1)) the same thing?, esperanto, 18:24
Re: Surprisingly hard group theory problem, cbrown, 18:14
Re: More fun this way?, Chip Eastham, 18:13
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 18:10
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 18:06
Re: cellular automata puzzle, Gerry Myerson, 18:03
Re: Surprisingly hard group theory problem, Gerry Myerson, 17:59
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, Robert Israel, 17:50
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, Robert Israel, 17:50
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 17:49
Re: seri, Gerry Myerson, 17:35
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 17:33
Re: Euler Function, Gerry Myerson, 17:32
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:26
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:16
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, Tim Peters, 17:16
Re: I don't understand this!, Arturo Magidin, 17:15
Re: The truth about Set theory, Rupert, 17:15
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:11
Re: Not a Mensa fan, Proginoskes, 17:11
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 16:59
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, david petry, 16:51
I don't understand this!, hsxhua001, 16:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:46
looking for a couple of formulas, ronin_iyo, 16:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:34
Re: "pi", mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, david petry, 16:09
Re: I want to be chelated, Tony Bad, 16:09
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 16:05
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 16:02
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, Narasimham, 16:01
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 15:57
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 15:56
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 15:54
Re: Complex Geometry-, JEMebius, 15:52
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 15:46
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 15:44
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 15:40
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 15:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 15:33
Re: level sets?, The World Wide Wade, 15:30
Re: OT: much or many, Virgil, 15:24
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 15:23
Re: The truth about Set theory, Rupert, 15:21
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 15:17
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 15:14
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 15:14
Re: lusin's theorem, The World Wide Wade, 15:14
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 15:12
Re: Pascal Distribution and Expectation Values, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:11
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 15:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 15:08
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 15:07
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 15:07
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 15:06
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 15:04
Euler Function, Frank_Horigan, 15:02
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, Arturo Magidin, 14:59
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 14:55
Re: "pi", Keith Meyer, 14:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:49
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 14:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 14:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:32
Re: matrix and graph theory, Chip Eastham, 14:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:26
Re: "pi", sinanasik, 14:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 14:21
Re: More fun this way?, Jon Slaughter, 14:09
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, Jon Slaughter, 14:07
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 14:04
Re: Pascal Distribution and Expectation Values, Robert Israel, 13:56
Re: seri, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 13:55
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:50
Re: The truth about Set theory, Rupert, 13:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:44
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 13:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe, 13:36
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 13:34
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, Randy Poe, 13:32
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 13:29
Re: I want to be chelated, CapCity, 13:27
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 13:26
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, Randy Poe, 13:25
question about polarity (duality) and "origin in its interior", Amar, 13:08
Re: cellular automata puzzle, Arthur J. O'Dwyer, 13:07
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, marcus_b, 13:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, imaginatorium, 13:01
Re: Calculating Euler Angles between two coordinate systems, Duncan Muirhead, 12:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 12:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 12:44
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, Puppet_Sock, 12:36
Re: lusin's theorem, Dave L. Renfro, 12:19
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jonathan Hoyle, 12:14
Re: Not a Mensa fan, David T. Ashley, 12:01
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, mmeron, 11:58
Re: Help "Come up with suitable operations to make the set {0,1,2} a Field.", sg552, 11:55
Re: non-separating 2-spheres in 3-manifolds, T.Foliakis, 11:54
Re: decimal longitude and latitude problem, David T. Ashley, 11:52
Re: "pi", José Carlos Santos, 11:46
Re: "pi", Randy Poe, 11:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 11:45
seri, lucifer, 11:44
Re: hard ?, Arturo Magidin, 11:33
"pi", sinanasik, 11:28
Complex Geometry, junoexpress, 11:28
hard ?, Ashay Burungale, 11:26
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 11:14
Re: morphisms in projective varieties, oferlock, 11:10
Re: Help "Come up with suitable operations to make the set {0,1,2} a Field.", sg552, 10:59
Re: non-separating 2-spheres in 3-manifolds, T.Foliakis, 10:46
Re: Convergent series, Dave L. Renfro, 10:32
Re: analysis with improper integral_, mina_world, 10:30
Re: Help "Come up with suitable operations to make the set {0,1,2} a Field.", Russell, 10:29
Re: Cut Points, Nick, 10:23
Re: Cut Points, Nick, 10:21
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tony Orlow, 10:19
250 problems, Julien Santini, 10:18
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tony Orlow, 10:17
Re: Help "Come up with suitable operations to make the set {0,1,2} a Field.", Russell, 10:15
Re: non-separating 2-spheres in 3-manifolds, Dick, 10:13
Re: cellular automata puzzle, Andersen, 10:12
What does gimbal lock imply, Clifford Nelson, 10:12
Re: Help "Come up with suitable operations to make the set {0,1,2} a Field.", Russell, 10:03
Re: Hare-y Problem, Nick, 09:54
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, Dr. Doctor, 09:48
Re: decimal longitude and latitude problem, Nick, 09:47
Re: Countability of real numbers, Bob Kolker, 09:40
Re: decimal longitude and latitude problem, Dave Seaman, 09:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 09:36
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:35
Re: matrix and graph theory, brian . james . kirby, 09:33
Re: JSH: Naive coding, Dr. Doctor, 09:32
Re: Naive coding, Dr. Doctor, 09:30
Re: Not a Mensa fan, danielmryan, 09:19
Re: matrix and graph theory, Chip Eastham, 09:14
Re: Surprisingly hard group theory problem-, JEMebius, 09:13
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, The Thing, 09:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:09
Re: Help "Come up with suitable operations to make the set {0,1,2} a Field.", Arturo Magidin, 08:43
Re: Unit Groups, Arturo Magidin, 08:40
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 08:34
Re: analysis with improper integral_, David W . Cantrell, 08:32
decimal longitude and latitude problem, steve, 08:32
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, Arturo Magidin, 08:31
Re: Small set theory., Lee Rudolph, 08:15
Re: Surprisingly hard group theory problem, Timothy Murphy, 08:14
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 08:10
Re: Help "Come up with suitable operations to make the set {0,1,2} a Field.", gnap, 08:09
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 08:03
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 08:03
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 08:01
Re: JSH: Naive coding, David C . Ullrich, 07:59
Re: non-separating 2-spheres in 3-manifolds, Toroidal MF, 07:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:55
Re: Cantor set = irrationals, David C . Ullrich, 07:55
Re: I want to be chelated, Larry Hammick, 07:52
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 07:47
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:45
Re: Calculating Euler Angles between two coordinate systems, ssothro, 07:44
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, The Last Danish Pastry, 07:43
Re: The Unity Problem, David C . Ullrich, 07:40
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:39
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:36
Re: non-separating 2-spheres in 3-manifolds, Lee Rudolph, 07:33
non-separating 2-spheres in 3-manifolds, Toroidal MF, 07:29
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:15
OT: much or many, Eckard Blumschein, 07:06
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:50
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Albrecht, 06:37
Re: Arrgghh -- Semantics and "Mathematical Homonyms" (Watts on second?), Nick, 06:35
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 06:30
Re: George B. Thomas Jr., 92, Dies; Wrote Calculus Text, Lee Rudolph, 06:25
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 06:24
Re: CBS inequality, Nick, 06:23
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 06:15
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 06:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 05:57
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 05:52
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 05:50
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 05:40
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 05:37
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 05:34
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 05:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 05:06
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 04:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:48
Re: Deformations in Topology, Narasimham, 04:47
Re: Nothing, Virgil, 04:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 04:43
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 04:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:36
Re: Deformations in Topology, Narasimham, 04:35
Re: The truth about Set theory, Tonico, 04:33
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 04:32
matrix and graph theory, brian . james . kirby, 04:31
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tonico, 04:23
Re: analysis with improper integral_, José Carlos Santos, 04:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 04:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 04:06
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 04:05
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 03:53
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 03:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, imaginatorium, 03:41
Re: Nothing, Eckard Blumschein, 03:36
Re: ( $$ logic wars $$ ( polysign ( re: math as religion ) ) ), Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 03:32
Re: Any real function is a composition of two measurable, eugene, 03:29
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 03:26
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, Narasimham, 03:17
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 03:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 02:56
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, Narasimham, 02:52
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 02:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 02:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Eckard Blumschein, 02:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 02:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 02:31
Re: lusin's theorem, cbrown, 02:28
Re: JSH: Naive coding, Proginoskes, 02:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 02:28
Re: I want to be chelated, Proginoskes, 02:25
Re: I want to be chelated, ��, 02:24
Re: The truth about Set theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:22
( $$ logic wars $$ ( polysign ( re: math as religion ) ) ), galathaea, 02:18
analysis with improper integral_, mina_world, 02:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 02:02
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, mmeron, 02:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 01:48
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, Tim Peters, 01:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 01:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 01:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 01:32
Re: The truth about Set theory, Rupert, 01:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 01:27
Re: Surprisingly hard group theory problem, James Dolan, 01:21
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 01:07
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 00:57
Re: Not a Mensa fan, danielmryan, 00:56
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 00:52
Re: JSH: Naive coding, Tim Peters, 00:49
Re: Not a Mensa fan, danielmryan, 00:46
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 00:39
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, The Thing, 00:35
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, gjedwards, 00:33
Re: JSH: Naive coding, Tim Peters, 00:31
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, gjedwards, 00:31
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, gjedwards, 00:31
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Virgil, 00:15
Re: I want to be chelated, Dr. Doctor, 00:14
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Virgil, 00:12
Re: projection in projective varieties, Jannick Asmus, 00:09
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, jstevh, 00:04
Re: Metrizability Problem, Jannick Asmus, 00:03
Re: Not a Mensa fan, sg552, 00:03
Re: JSH: I want to be chelated, ��, 00:03
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 00:02

November 15, 2006

Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 23:58
Re: More fun this way?, David Moran, 23:54
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 23:54
Re: Any real function is a composition of two measurable, Jannick Asmus, 23:53
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 23:52
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 23:49
Re: morphisms in projective varieties, Jannick Asmus, 23:46
Re: Unit Groups, Jannick Asmus, 23:42
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, Tim Peters, 23:39
Unit Groups, Jules, 23:36
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, gjedwards, 23:34
Re: JSH: More fun this way?, gjedwards, 23:33
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:32
Re: Not a Mensa fan, Jesse F. Hughes, 23:31
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Farts Loudly in the Library., 23:28
Re: Not a Mensa fan, gjedwards, 23:24
CBS inequality, pdkarnik, 23:21
Re: Not a Mensa fan, sg552, 23:05
Re: Not a Mensa fan, Tim Peters, 23:01
JSH: More fun this way?, jstevh, 22:59
Re: Educational publisher claims 12/0 = 0, David W . Cantrell, 22:49
Re: An Inequality for the elements of a matrix, Daniel Mayost, 22:46
morphisms in projective varieties, oferlock, 22:45
Re: Not a Mensa fan, jstevh, 22:44
Re: Naive coding, jstevh, 22:35
Re: The truth about Set theory, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:15
Re: Not a Mensa fan, danielmryan, 22:13
Re: Not a Mensa fan, danielmryan, 22:08
Re: Surprisingly hard group theory problem, Gerry Myerson, 21:58
:: generalised trigonometry : product and sum formuli ::, galathaea, 21:55
Re: Not a Mensa fan, danielmryan, 21:52
Re: Not a Mensa fan, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:50
Re: lusin's theorem, jennifer, 21:46
Re: Not a Mensa fan, danielmryan, 21:43
Re: Simpler code challenge with prime counting, Jesse F. Hughes, 21:43
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Michael Press, 21:39
Re: Exponentation, kibby, 21:34
Re: JSH: Naive coding, Farts Loudly in the Library., 21:33
Re: Arrgghh -- Semantics and "Mathematical Homonyms" (Watts on second?), Hatunen, 21:28
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 21:25
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Dik T. Winter, 21:23
Pascal Distribution and Expectation Values, Taria, 21:18
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 21:12
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 21:10
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 21:10
Re: Not a Mensa fan, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:08
Re: JSH: Naive coding, Proginoskes, 21:05
Re: Small set theory., MoeBlee, 21:04
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 21:02
Re: Naive coding, Dr. Doctor, 21:01
Re: Not a Mensa fan, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:55
Re: Not a Mensa fan, jstevh, 20:55
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 20:53
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 20:52
JSH: Naive coding, jstevh, 20:51
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 20:47
Re: An Inequality for the elements of a matrix, cpn53g, 20:46
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 20:46
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 20:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:42
Re: Not a Mensa fan, Jesse F. Hughes, 20:37
Re: Educational publisher claims 12/0 = 0, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:36
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 20:31
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 20:28
Re: Educational publisher claims 12/0 = 0, Jesse F. Hughes, 20:28
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 20:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:17
Re: xlog x bounded?, Michael Press, 20:12
Re: Not a Mensa fan, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 20:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:57
Integer solutions to x^5 + y^5 = z^2 (thread from last month), OwlHoot, 19:56
Surprisingly hard group theory problem, Snis Pilbor, 19:53
Re: Ethics For Physicists, Gib Bogle, 19:48
Re: monotone increasing function on the reals taking only irrational values, Dick, 19:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 19:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:21
Acute Triangle, Deep, 19:14
Re: Not a Mensa fan, danielmryan, 19:07
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, Tim Peters, 19:04
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!-, JEMebius, 19:03
Re: Condition on singular or nearly singular correlation matrices, Ray Koopman, 18:45
Re: Educational publisher claims 12/0 = 0, Michael J Hardy, 18:44
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, Ignacio Larrosa Ca�estro, 18:39
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 18:30
Re: Cantor set = irrationals, Dave L. Renfro, 18:27
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, 131208, 18:25
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 18:18
Re: computation of zeros of Bessel functions, Michael Press, 18:16
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 18:15
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 18:14
Re: The Qur'�n and Science, Brian, 18:07
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 17:57
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 17:57
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, markwh04, 17:55
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 17:54
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 17:53
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:51
Re: "Small" Proper Classes?, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:43
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:40
Re: The truth about Set theory, MoeBlee, 17:38
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:36
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, Taria, 17:36
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:31
Re: Any real function is a composition of two measurable, eugene, 17:28
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 17:23
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, Proginoskes, 17:20
Re: Any real function is a composition of two measurable, Jannick Asmus, 17:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 17:12
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:10
Re: The truth about Set theory, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:09
Cantor set = irrationals, eugene, 17:07
Re: The truth about Set theory, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:06
Re: eigenvalues, Jannick Asmus, 17:02
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 17:01
Re: gradient inverse-, JEMebius, 16:58
Re: level sets?, Randy Poe, 16:54
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 16:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 16:52
"Small" Proper Classes?, Math1723, 16:44
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 16:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:40
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 16:38
Re: The game is continued..., Kwok Man Hui, 16:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:27
Re: Educational publisher claims 12/0 = 0, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:22
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, Narasimham, 16:20
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, Narasimham, 16:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:16
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, Narasimham, 16:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:12
Re: level sets?, The World Wide Wade, 16:12
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:08
Re: Educational publisher claims 12/0 = 0, Proginoskes, 16:08
Re: gradient inverse, Proginoskes, 16:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:57
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 15:54
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Virgil, 15:51
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, 131208, 15:48
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, Gib Bogle, 15:45
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, 131208, 15:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 15:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 15:41
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Virgil, 15:40
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tonico, 15:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 15:39
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, Narasimham, 15:39
Re: Find a in the y=a^x graph!, A N Niel, 15:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 15:33
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 15:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 15:31
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 15:30
Re: An infinite debate, Michael Press, 15:24
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 15:24
Find a in the y=a^x graph!, 131208, 15:19
Re: level sets?, Randy Poe, 15:14
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 15:11
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 15:01
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 14:59
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 14:56
Bayes decision boundary between 3 classes?, Question, 14:55
Re: Condition on singular or nearly singular correlation matrices, W. Dale Hall, 14:50
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 14:48
Re: projection in projective varieties, Kira Yamato, 14:46
Structure Unit-Number Theorem.By Aiya-Oba, Anthony A. Aiya-Oba, 14:45
Re: Condition on singular or nearly singular correlation matrices, mzhang33, 14:44
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 14:44
Re: Metrizability Problem, jscarp04, 14:40
Re: Condition on singular or nearly singular correlation matrices, Ray Koopman, 14:38
Re: level sets?, Arturo Magidin, 14:38
level sets?, Mark-T, 14:28
Re: Envelopping Surface [Was: Volume calculation of convex hulls], M.J.T. Guy, 14:25
Re: projection in projective varieties, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx, 14:24
Re: Small set theory., Richard Harter, 14:24
Condition on singular or nearly singular correlation matrices, mzhang33, 14:21
Re: The Unity Problem, Bob Kolker, 14:20
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 14:06
Re: lusin's theorem, Dave L. Renfro, 14:01
Re: projection in projective varieties, Kira Yamato, 13:59
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 13:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:52
Re: problems in E.L. Lehmann & George Casella, "Theory of Point Estimation, W. Dale Hall, 13:47
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 13:46
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 13:41
Re: The truth about Set theory, Michael Stemper, 13:39
Re: General Form for a Line, sg552, 13:37
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 13:31
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 13:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:28
Re: The Qur'�n and Science, Larry Hammick, 13:21
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 13:18
Re: General Form for a Line, Michael Stemper, 13:15
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 13:11
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, litsohate, 12:58
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 12:51
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, litsohate, 12:46
Re: George B. Thomas Jr., 92, Dies; Wrote Calculus Text, John H Palmieri, 12:46
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 12:45
Re: Asymptotics, Chris Smith, 12:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Randy Poe, 12:34
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, Taria, 12:34
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 12:31
Re: Nothing, Tony Orlow, 12:26
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Tony Orlow, 12:24
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 12:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 12:19
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 12:18
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:14
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 12:12
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, Taria, 12:10
The Qur'ân and Science, xyx787, 12:07
Re: newsgroup traffic rating, Ioannis, 12:06
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 12:05
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, hagman, 12:03
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 12:02
newsgroup traffic rating, TCL, 11:58
Re: Symmetry group of a square, Arturo Magidin, 11:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 11:51
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:51
projection in projective varieties, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx, 11:50
Re: Symmetry group of a square, jseppa17@xxxxxxxxx, 11:49
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:47
Re: eigenvalues, Robert Israel, 11:44
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:43
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 11:39
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:37
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 11:36
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:35
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:31
Re: A limit stumper, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 11:30
Re: Small set theory., Aatu Koskensilta, 11:28
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:25
Re: Exponentation, Pubkeybreaker, 11:16
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 11:10
Re: Small set theory., Richard Harter, 11:10
Re: The truth about Set theory, Aatu Koskensilta, 11:07
Nothing, Eckard Blumschein, 11:07
Re: Help "Come up with suitable operations to make the set {0,1,2} a Field.", sg552, 11:06
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:05
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:04
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:03
Re: Help "Come up with suitable operations to make the set {0,1,2} a Field.", Arturo Magidin, 11:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:00
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:58
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 10:57
Re: The truth about Set theory, Larry Hammick, 10:53
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 10:53
Re: Symmetry group of a square, Arturo Magidin, 10:52
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, sg552, 10:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:46
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, Arturo Magidin, 10:45
Help "Come up with suitable operations to make the set {0,1,2} a Field.", gnap, 10:44
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, sg552, 10:41
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:36
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:32
Re: A question about knots, bob . papa . smurf, 10:17
Re: You are completely out-classed, Larry Hammick, 10:15
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 10:12
Re: The truth about Set theory, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:09
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 10:06
Re: Symmetry group of a square, jseppa17@xxxxxxxxx, 10:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:57
Re: An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:48
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 09:40
Re: Probablity questions, Nick, 09:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 09:23
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, Nick, 09:17
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:14
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, danielmryan, 09:13
Re: eigenvalues, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 09:13
Re: The truth about Set theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:08
Re: monotone increasing function on the reals taking only irrational values, The World Wide Wade, 09:06
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 09:01
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:49
Re: Educational publisher claims 12/0 = 0, Jesse F. Hughes, 08:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 08:45
An Invitation to Quantum Mathematics, Mpilot, 08:45
Re: Symmetry group of a square, Jyrki Lahtonen, 08:41
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, Nick, 08:36
A query about SVD, chandra, 08:25
Re: eigenvalues, Nico, 08:21
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 08:18
Re: eigenvalues, David C . Ullrich, 08:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:11
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, David C . Ullrich, 08:08
Re: Countability of real numbers, Randy Poe, 08:07
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, David Bernier, 08:07
Re: The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 08:05
Re: eigenvalues, Tonico, 08:04
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:59
Re: The Unity Problem, David C . Ullrich, 07:54
Re: A limit stumper, Stan Liou, 07:48
Re: lusin's theorem, David C . Ullrich, 07:47
Symmetry group of a square, jseppa17@xxxxxxxxx, 07:47
Re: lusin's theorem, David C . Ullrich, 07:46
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 07:41
Re: Calculating Euler Angles between two coordinate systems, Duncan Muirhead, 07:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:31
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 07:28
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:23
The truth about Set theory, Andrew Usher, 07:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 07:13
Re: Small set theory., Aatu Koskensilta, 07:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:12
Re: Small set theory., Aatu Koskensilta, 07:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:05
Re: You are completely out-classed, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:57
Re: A question about knots, Lee Rudolph, 06:56
Re: A question about knots, Lee Rudolph, 06:55
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 06:53
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 06:51
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 06:48
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 06:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:46
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 06:45
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 06:45
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, Taria, 06:43
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Eckard Blumschein, 06:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:34
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Eckard Blumschein, 06:31
Calculating Euler Angles between two coordinate systems, ssothro, 06:27
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, Taria, 06:24
Re: eigenvalues, Alois Steindl, 06:19
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, Nick, 06:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 06:13
Re: An infinite debate, Eckard Blumschein, 06:08
Re: eigenvalues, Derek Holt, 06:07
Re: Small set theory., Eckard Blumschein, 05:52
Re: A question about knots, Dan, 05:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 05:32
Re: A question about knots, Dan, 05:31
Re: eigenvalues, Tonico, 05:29
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, Tim Peters, 05:24
Re: eigenvalues, Nico, 05:13
Re: eigenvalues, Nico, 05:02
Re: eigenvalues, Alois Steindl, 04:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 04:44
Re: Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, David Bernier, 04:36
Re: eigenvalues, Gottfried Helms, 04:16
Re: You are completely out-classed, Larry Hammick, 04:05
Re: gradient inverse, smn, 03:59
Re: eigenvalues, Nico, 03:53
Re: gradient inverse, smn, 03:49
Re: eigenvalues, Tonico, 03:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, RLG, 03:36
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, Taria, 03:25
Variance and a seating arrangment on a rectangular table problem, Taria, 03:09
Re: eigenvalues, Jannick Asmus, 03:04
Re: Ray inside a cone., pierre . bornsztein, 02:53
problems in E.L. Lehmann & George Casella, "Theory of Point Estimation, nazanin, 02:47
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 02:42
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, David Bernier, 02:28
eigenvalues, Nico, 02:27
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, Tim Peters, 02:23
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, Gene Ward Smith, 02:13
Re: Not a Mensa fan, Horatio Q Dorkbucket, 01:44
Re: Ray inside a cone., Virgil, 01:42
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 01:35
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, Proginoskes, 01:18
A question about knots, bob . papa . smurf, 01:10
Singular values for a similar group of documents in SVD, chandra, 00:55
Re: trigonometric series, rancid moth, 00:52
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, aatu . koskensilta, 00:36
Re: Ray inside a cone., Narasimham, 00:31
Re: Not a Mensa fan, Dr. Doctor, 00:09
Re: monotone increasing function on the reals taking only irrational values, Butch Malahide, 00:03

November 14, 2006

Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, David Bernier, 23:44
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 23:27
Re: Another Collatz-like function, Gerry Myerson, 23:22
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 23:18
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 23:15
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 23:15
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 23:12
Re: A limit stumper, Christopher Night, 23:12
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 23:11
Re: George B. Thomas Jr., 92, Dies; Wrote Calculus Text, Gerry Myerson, 23:10
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, jshsucks, 23:09
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 23:07
Re: monotone increasing function on the reals taking only irrational values, Butch Malahide, 23:04
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, jsh_is_a_ tard, 23:02
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 22:59
Educational publisher claims 12/0 = 0, Michael J Hardy, 22:52
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, sg552, 22:51
Re: Probablity questions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 22:51
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 22:49
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 22:44
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 22:42
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, jstevh, 22:42
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 22:36
Re: A limit stumper, Brian, 22:35
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 22:35
2006 Virginia Tech Regional Contest Results, Peter Linnell, 22:34
Re: Computing Pi(x) and p_n, Tim Peters, 22:33
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 22:29
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 22:25
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 22:23
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Virgil, 22:20
Re: lusin's theorem, The World Wide Wade, 22:15
Re: Probablity questions, Taria, 22:15
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 22:08
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 21:57
Re: Countability of real numbers, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:57
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, Jesse F. Hughes, 21:54
Re: lusin's theorem, jennifer, 21:49
Re: lusin's theorem, jennifer, 21:49
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 21:49
Re: Asymptotics, Robert Israel, 21:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:44
Re: JSH: Prime counting: code challenge!!!, jsh_is_a_ tard, 21:38
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, jsh_is_a_ tard, 21:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:33
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:32
Re: lusin's theorem, Dave L. Renfro, 21:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:25
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, Jesse F. Hughes, 21:20
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, gjedwards, 21:18
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:18
Re: lusin's theorem, jennifer, 21:12
Re: monotone increasing function on the reals taking only irrational values, The World Wide Wade, 21:09
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, jstevh, 21:09
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, gjedwards, 21:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:08
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, David Moran, 21:07
Re: JSH: Not a Mensa fan, gjedwards, 21:07
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, jshtardball, 21:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:05
Re: Not a Mensa fan, jsh_is_a_tard, 21:04
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, jstevh, 21:04
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, gjedwards, 21:03
Re: JSH: Every read Riemann's own words?, Tim Peters, 21:02
JSH: Not a Mensa fan, jstevh, 20:58
Re: lusin's theorem, Dave L. Renfro, 20:54
Re: Another Collatz-like function, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:53
Re: lusin's theorem, cbrown, 20:50
Re: JSH: You are completely out-classed, Rick Decker, 20:48
Re: George B. Thomas Jr., 92, Dies; Wrote Calculus Text, Lee Rudolph, 20:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:43
Re: monotone increasing function on the reals taking only irrational values, Gerry Myerson, 20:43
Re: JSH: Prime counting: code challenge!!!, jsh_is_lame, 20:43
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, Liviu, 20:42
Computing Pi(x) and p_n, serdar . boztas, 20:31
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, jsh_is_lame, 20:25
Re: topology with accumulation point., mina_world, 20:23
Re: You are completely out-classed, jshtarddd, 20:21
Re: lusin's theorem, jennifer, 20:18
JSH: You are completely out-classed, jstevh, 20:16
Re: An uncountable countable set, David R Tribble, 20:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:04
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:59
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, jstevh, 19:53
Re: George B. Thomas Jr., 92, Dies; Wrote Calculus Text, MGW, 19:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:49
Re: Exponentation, kibby, 19:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:46
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 19:45
monotone increasing function on the reals taking only irrational values, dmadden, 19:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:43
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 19:42
Re: lusin's theorem, Robert Israel, 19:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:32
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 19:31
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, MoeBlee, 19:28
Re: General Form for a Line, sg552, 19:27
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 19:25
Re: General Form for a Line, Arjang Assadi, 19:23
Re: An Inequality for the elements of a matrix, Daniel Mayost, 19:21
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 19:19
General Form for a Line, Anthony, 19:15
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, aatu . koskensilta, 19:14
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 19:07
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 19:06
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 19:04
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 19:03
Re: Eigen values of a non-square matrix, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 19:02
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 19:00
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil, 18:49
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Virgil, 18:48
Re: trigonometric series, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 18:40
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Virgil, 18:25
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, Liviu, 18:11
Re: gradient inverse, Daniel Mayost, 18:06
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 18:05
Re: Probablity questions, David Bernier, 18:04
Syariat Islam tentang Prediksi dan Prakiraan Cuaca BMG, Abdulloh, 17:47
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:47
Suburnya Dunia Perdukunan (Paranormal), Abdulloh, 17:44
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 17:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:31
Penyakit Ganas yang Melanda Fithrah, Jelajah Sejati, 17:30
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 17:24
Terjadinya Qiyamat Menurut Islam, Jelajah Sejati, 17:24
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 17:19
Ziarah Kubur Syar'iyah Dan Ziarah Kubur Syirkiyah, Jelajah Sejati, 17:17
Re: Math as Religion, Lester Zick, 17:16
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 17:14
Re: Exponentation, David W . Cantrell, 17:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:08
Re: gradient inverse, dl, 17:05
Re: The Unity Problem, Sue..., 17:00
Re: a new solution to 2^n = 3 (mod n), Phil Carmody, 16:51
Re: gradient inverse, drmwecker, 16:50
Re: gradient inverse, drmwecker, 16:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 16:43
Re: volume between two level sets, novis, 16:39
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 16:10
Re: JSH: Every read Riemann's own words?, Michael J Hardy, 16:08
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 15:54
Re: Ray inside a cone., Robert Israel, 15:54
Re: Combinatorics and functions, cbrown, 15:40
Re: homeomorphic to a subset of R, W. Dale Hall, 15:39
gradient inverse, novis, 15:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 15:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 15:30
George B. Thomas Jr., 92, Dies; Wrote Calculus Text, goddamnedliarbush, 15:29
The 40 dice problem (fun problem), Bart Vandewoestyne, 15:20
volume between two level sets, novis, 15:20
Re: Small set theory., Richard Harter, 15:20
Re: Ray inside a cone., Narasimham, 15:08
Special case of finding shortest path in a graph, secular, 15:07
An Inequality for the elements of a matrix, cpn53g, 15:05
Re: Cyclic group, Derek Holt, 15:03
Cyclic group, bluelabel, 14:53
Re: Exponentation, Dave L. Renfro, 14:23
Re: Question about calculating odds, aschexna, 14:14
Re: lusin's theorem, David C. Ullrich, 13:59
Re: JSH: Every read Riemann's own words?, David C. Ullrich, 13:54
Re: The Unity Problem, David C. Ullrich, 13:52
Re: topology with accumulation point., José Carlos Santos, 13:50
Re: Question about calculating odds, David C. Ullrich, 13:46
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Michael Stemper, 13:32
Question about calculating odds, aschexna, 13:26
Re: Liouvilles formula, Narasimham, 13:22
Re: Exponentation, Pubkeybreaker, 13:21
Re: The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 13:17
Re: Exponentation, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:12
Re: Probablity questions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Michael Stemper, 13:02
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Michael Stemper, 13:00
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:45
Yu-val Ne-eman & Gauge Theory of Gravity, Jack Sarfatti, 12:27
Re: JSH: Every read Riemann's own words?, gjedwards, 12:01
Re: Exponentation, Dave L. Renfro, 11:55
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:52
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:44
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 11:40
Re: Eigen values of a non-square matrix, Trifon, 11:37
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 11:29
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 11:28
Re: Eigen values of a non-square matrix, Alois Steindl, 11:20
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 11:13
Re: Eigen values of a non-square matrix, Arturo Magidin, 11:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 11:09
Re: The Unity Problem, David C . Ullrich, 11:08
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 11:08
Re: lusin's theorem, jennifer, 11:06
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 11:04
Re: Another Collatz-like function, josepmlopez, 11:04
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Eckard Blumschein, 11:02
Re: counter example in analysis, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:58
Re: homeomorphic to a subset of R, David C . Ullrich, 10:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Sebastian Holzmann, 10:56
Re: JSH: Every read Riemann's own words?, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:55
Re: Eigen values of a non-square matrix, chandra, 10:54
Re: counter example in analysis, Eckard Blumschein, 10:50
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 10:49
Re: counter example in analysis, David C . Ullrich, 10:49
Re: Eigen values of a non-square matrix, Arturo Magidin, 10:45
Eigen values of a non-square matrix, chandra, 10:43
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:42
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Franziska Neugebauer, 10:37
Re: Polynomials From Pascal's Triangle, Han de Bruijn, 10:24
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Eckard Blumschein, 10:20
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 10:15
Re: The Unity Problem, Sam Wormley, 10:09
Re: interest rate over a specific period of time?, Arturo Magidin, 10:08
Re: interest rate over a specific period of time?, A N Niel, 10:05
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David C . Ullrich, 10:03
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:00
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Bob Kolker, 09:54
Re: topology with accumulation point., mina_world, 09:50
Re: JSH: Every read Riemann's own words?, The Last Danish Pastry, 09:50
interest rate over a specific period of time?, kommi10, 09:46
Re: JSH: Every read Riemann's own words?, David C . Ullrich, 09:44
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:43
Re: Liouvilles formula, Narasimham, 09:41
Re: topology with accumulation point., mina_world, 09:41
Re: Small set theory., Richard Harter, 09:40
Re: Exponentation, Pubkeybreaker, 09:36
Re: Exponentation, Pubkeybreaker, 09:36
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:33
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:31
Re: Exponentation, Badger, 09:31
Re: Polynomials From Pascal's Triangle, secondmouse, 09:29
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 09:20
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 09:18
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, David Bernier, 09:04
Re: Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:04
Re: Exponentation, Nick, 08:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 08:57
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:49
Re: Probablity questions, Nick, 08:49
Re: Exponentation, Nick, 08:46
Off topic: time; was: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:42
Re: homeomorphic to a subset of R, William Elliot, 08:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:36
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:34
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Arturo Magidin, 08:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 08:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:25
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 08:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:13
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 08:08
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, David Moran, 08:01
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 08:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 07:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:58
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:54
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 07:47
Re: homeomorphic to a subset of R, G. A. Edgar, 07:42
Polynomials From Pascal's Triangle, Han de Bruijn, 07:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:35
The Unity Problem, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 07:32
Re: Ray inside a cone., Ioannis, 07:27
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, William Hughes, 07:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:26
Re: Ray inside a cone-, JEMebius, 07:21
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Rainer Rosenthal, 07:20
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 07:19
Re: Countability of real numbers, Randy Poe, 07:13
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 07:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 07:07
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 07:06
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 07:01
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 06:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:47
Re: Ray inside a cone., Ioannis, 06:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:37
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:32
Re: topology with accumulation point., José Carlos Santos, 06:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 06:24
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:24
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 06:22
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 06:04
Re: Prime counting: code challenge!!!, Nick, 05:47
Re: Ray inside a cone., pierre . bornsztein, 05:37
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Rainer Rosenthal, 04:59
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 04:59
Re: notation for natural numbers, Derek Holt, 04:57
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 04:53
[OT] man vs machine 2006 , chess, David Bernier, 04:51
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 04:49
Re: An infinite debate, Eckard Blumschein, 04:43
Re: help solving trig problem, Noehl, 04:43
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, jstevh, 04:35
topology with accumulation point., mina_world, 04:23
Re: Volume calculation of convex hulls, Thomas Mautsch, 03:55
Envelopping Surface [Was: Volume calculation of convex hulls], Thomas Mautsch, 03:55
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, Proginoskes, 03:44
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, Liviu, 03:32
Re: Ray inside a cone., Ioannis, 03:14
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, Proginoskes, 02:42
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Proginoskes, 02:37
Re: Welcome to small n with 2^n = 3 (mod n), Proginoskes, 02:31
$$ logic wars $ case studies in crankbustin' $$, galathaea, 02:21
Re: a new solution to 2^n = 3 (mod n), Tonico, 02:08
Re: Ray inside a cone., ghoul, 01:51
Re: The proof of mass vector., Eric Gisse, 01:40
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Ross A. Finlayson, 01:11
Re: The proof of mass vector., Ka-In Yen, 01:06
Re: Any graduate program without Bachelor's degree?, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 00:55
Re: trigonometric series, rancid moth, 00:44
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 00:40
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 00:31
Re: trigonometric series, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:06

November 13, 2006

Re: trigonometric series, rancid moth, 23:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 23:56
Re: SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY and PSYCHO-ELECTRONIC WEAPON ATTACKS by 100,000 FBI and NSA SPY PSYCHOPATHS on INNOCENT AMERICANS, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 23:34
Re: inner product spaces 2, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:31
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:21
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, Dr. Doctor, 23:18
Re: JSH: Every read Riemann's own words?, Farts Loudly in the Library., 23:08
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:05
Re: JSH: Every read Riemann's own words?, Dr. Doctor, 22:59
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 22:57
Re: trigonometric series, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:53
Re: Exponentation, rancid moth, 22:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 22:40
Re: Ray inside a cone., Gib Bogle, 22:34
trigonometric series, rancid moth, 22:30
Re: JSH: Every read Riemann's own words?, Gib Bogle, 22:30
Re: Probablity questions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 22:20
Re: Joe Crump?, Max Alekseyev, 22:18
Re: Exponentation, David Moran, 22:14
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 22:08
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 22:06
Re: JSH: Every read Riemann's own words?, jshsucks, 22:04
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, William Hughes, 22:02
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 21:56
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, Farts Loudly in the Library., 21:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 21:45
Re: Every read Riemann's own words?, David Moran, 21:37
Joe Crump?, Gerry Myerson, 21:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 21:34
Re: inner product spaces, Robert Israel, 21:32
JSH: Every read Riemann's own words?, jstevh, 21:30
Exponentation, kibby, 21:30
Re: What is the answer of the following integral?, Robert Israel, 21:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 21:20
Re: Probablity questions, Taria, 21:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 21:04
Re: To simplify a product of 16 sines in 5 variables, David M Einstein, 21:02
Re: counter example in analysis, Michael Press, 21:00
Re: homeomorphic to a subset of R, William Elliot, 20:55
Re: help solving trig problem, David Moran, 20:53
Re: help solving trig problem, William Elliot, 20:52
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:36
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 20:32
Re: notation for natural numbers, Dik T. Winter, 20:30
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 20:29
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 20:28
help solving trig problem, TFTAJLLYMXZP, 20:24
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 20:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:22
Re: homeomorphic to a subset of R, William Elliot, 20:15
Re: homeomorphic to a subset of R, William Elliot, 20:12
Re: a new solution to 2^n = 3 (mod n), Max Alekseyev, 20:08
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Dik T. Winter, 19:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:53
Re: M(n,z) = Sum[G(m,z) / m^z ; m=1,...,n] = ?, Akira Bergman, 19:47
Re: what is the sum of r^k / k! when k goes to infinity from 1 ?, Gottfried Helms, 19:46
Re: a new solution to 2^n = 3 (mod n), Gerry Myerson, 19:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:37
Re: what is the sum of r^k / k! when k goes to infinity from 1 ?, Gerry Myerson, 19:33
Re: Any real function is a composition of two measurable, jseppa17@xxxxxxxxx, 19:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:28
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, The Thing, 19:24
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 19:22
Re: notation for natural numbers, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:15
Any real function is a composition of two measurable, eugene, 19:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 19:07
Re: lusin's theorem, W. Dale Hall, 19:05
what is the sum of r^k / k! when k goes to infinity from 1 ?, Jonie, 19:01
Re: Small set theory., Virgil, 18:56
Re: Small set theory., Virgil, 18:53
Re: To simplify a product of 16 sines in 5 variables, CW, 18:50
Teman Sejati bukan Diukur Materi, Jelajah Sejati, 18:40
Re: To simplify a product of 16 sines in 5 variables, CW, 18:40
Tabahlah Menghadapi Musibah!, Jelajah Sejati, 18:38
Orang yang takut (Khouf) kepada Alloh, Jelajah Sejati, 18:37
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Murphy, 18:36
Orang Yang Paling Bersedih, Jelajah Sejati, 18:33
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 18:30
Semut Yang Mendapat Petunjuk, Jelajah Sejati, 18:29
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 18:28
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 18:26
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 18:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 18:17
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 18:16
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 18:14
Welcome to small n with 2^n = 3 (mod n), Rainer Rosenthal, 18:09
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, zuhair, 18:07
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, proton, 18:06
Re: Combinatorics and functions, theronruiz, 17:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:57
Re: Cardinals as Equivalence class?, zuhair, 17:52
Re: Math as Religion, Lester Zick, 17:45
Re: Math as Religion, Lester Zick, 17:42
Re: Creation and Annihilation Operators in QM, Robert Israel, 17:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 17:32
Re: Math as Religion, Lester Zick, 17:30
Re: lusin's theorem, The World Wide Wade, 17:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 17:23
Renormalizable Emergent Quantum Gravity & Supersolids, Jack Sarfatti, 17:18
Posterior to Wishart prior, pkliber, 17:17
Re: Math as Religion, Lester Zick, 17:16
Re: Infinite system of linear equations, Robert Israel, 17:15
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 17:10
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 17:09
Re: lusin's theorem, jennifer, 17:06
Re: Another Collatz-like function, Gerry Myerson, 16:54
Re: a maximization problem, Robert Israel, 16:54
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:48
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 16:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:33
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 16:32
Re: notation for natural numbers, Jules, 16:31
Re: lusin's theorem, Dave L. Renfro, 16:27
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:21
Re: lusin's theorem, The World Wide Wade, 16:19
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:18
MFLT Solutions for nothing and Pythagorean triples for free, richard miller, 16:18
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:16
notation for natural numbers, Pouya D. Tafti, 16:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:09
Re: An infinite debate, Mike Kelly, 16:08
Re: Probablity questions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:07
a new solution to 2^n = 3 (mod n), Max Alekseyev, 16:03
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 16:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:55
Re: Probablity questions, Taria, 15:51
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:50
Re: homeomorphic to a subset of R, W. Dale Hall, 15:50
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 15:41
Re: Small set theory., Virgil, 15:30
Re: homeomorphic to a subset of R, David C. Ullrich, 15:25
Re: valid proof? of "x = y modulo m => x, y same remainders divided by m", Arturo Magidin, 15:24
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 15:24
IS THERE AN INEXHAUSTIBILITY PHENOMENON?, LauLuna, 15:22
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 15:21
Re: valid proof? of "x = y modulo m => x, y same remainders divided by m", G Patel, 15:21
Re: Probablity questions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:13
Re: valid proof? of "x = y modulo m => x, y same remainders divided by m", Arturo Magidin, 15:12
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Tonico, 15:10
Re: counter example in analysis, Virgil, 15:09
valid proof? of "x = y modulo m => x, y same remainders divided by m", G Patel, 15:08
Re: Ray inside a cone., Ioannis, 15:08
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 14:55
lusin's theorem, jennifer, 14:52
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 14:50
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 14:48
Neural network software, Mike, 14:45
Re: Countability of real numbers, Sebastian Holzmann, 14:45
Re: Prove that f(x) is identically x, A N Niel, 14:43
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, sg552, 14:43
Re: Ray inside a cone., Ioannis, 14:41
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 14:40
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, Puppet_Sock, 14:38
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 14:36
Re: Now there's a mathematician in Congress, Brian Borchers, 14:34
Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil, 14:31
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Virgil, 14:28
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Virgil, 14:17
Re: Now there's a mathematician in Congress, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:10
Re: Now there's a mathematician in Congress, Randy Poe, 14:10
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:06
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, Robert Israel, 13:55
Re: Now there's a mathematician in Congress, Dave L. Renfro, 13:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:36
Row/Column Solitaire Game, Leroy Quet, 13:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 13:18
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, sg552, 13:16
Re: Now there's a mathematician in Congress, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:14
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 13:13
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, sg552, 13:13
Re: Another Collatz-like function, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:07
Re: SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY and PSYCHO-ELECTRONIC WEAPON ATTACKS by 100,000 FBI, Oleg, 12:58
discret dynamical system, Oleg, 12:55
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, MoeBlee, 12:53
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, MoeBlee, 12:45
Probablity questions, Taria, 12:44
a maximization problem, tango, 12:26
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 12:21
Ray inside a cone., pierre . bornsztein, 12:16
Re: To simplify a product of 16 sines in 5 variables, David M Einstein, 12:02
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 12:02
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 11:58
Re: Prove that f(x) is identically x, Jannick Asmus, 11:49
Re: Small set theory., Richard Harter, 11:48
Re: Prove that f(x) is identically x, Kenshin, 11:46
Re: Prove that f(x) is identically x, Igor Khavkine, 11:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:43
Re: Infinite system of linear equations, Klueless, 11:42
Re: Prove that f(x) is identically x, Jannick Asmus, 11:40
Prove that f(x) is identically x, Kenshin, 11:33
Re: Asymptotics, A N Niel, 11:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:58
Asymptotics, Chris Smith, 10:57
Re: Small set theory., Richard Harter, 10:54
Re: Limits at infinity in R, Dik T. Winter, 10:51
Re: Is this proof correct?, Arturo Magidin, 10:50
Re: homeomorphic to a subset of R, G. A. Edgar, 10:49
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein, 10:49
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:45
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, CapCity, 10:45
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:44
Re: A new definition of natural numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 10:43
Re: Is this proof correct?, John Coleman, 10:39
Re: Dumb factoring question, Nick, 10:39
Re: a question about 4 colorings, mathisart, 10:34
Re: Small set theory., Richard Harter, 10:32
Re: Small set theory., Richard Harter, 10:31
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:29
Re: Continuous injection from a subset of R^n to R, Eckard Blumschein, 10:28
Is this proof correct?, bluelabel, 10:27
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:20
Re: Proper class.Proper class ?, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:16
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 10:16
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 10:11
Re: Hex to Float conversion of GPS Latitude, volosov, 10:11
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 10:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 10:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 10:07
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Arturo Magidin, 10:05
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 10:02
Re: Small set theory., peter . kosinar, 10:01
Re: Cantor Confusion, Daniel Grubb, 10:00
Re: Countability of real numbers, Randy Poe, 09:58
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:55
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 09:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:37
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 09:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:29
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 09:21
Now there's a mathematician in Congress, markr1000, 09:12
Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein, 09:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 09:06
Re: Hex to Float conversion of GPS Latitude, Michael J�rgensen, 08:57
Re: counter example in analysis, Eckard Blumschein, 08:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 08:49
Re: counter example in analysis, Eckard Blumschein, 08:30
Re: homeomorphic to a subset of R, William Elliot, 08:30
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Murphy, 08:25
Re: tensor product twister, Jannick Asmus, 08:21
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Murphy, 08:21
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 08:19
Re: Limits at infinity in R, David W. Cantrell, 08:16
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 08:08
Re: tensor product twister, Timothy Murphy, 08:02
Re: Limits at infinity in R, David W. Cantrell, 07:57
homeomorphic to a subset of R, G. A. Edgar, 07:53
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 07:48
Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 07:41
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 07:37
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 07:35
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 07:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 07:28
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 07:24
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 07:20
Re: An infinite debate, William Hughes, 07:17
A small puzzle, vreddyp, 07:06
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, aatu . koskensilta, 07:03
Re: An infinite debate, Eckard Blumschein, 06:56
Re: An infinite debate, Albrecht, 06:52
Re: PhD Fellowships in Combinatorial Scientific Computing, The Demon Prince of Absurdity, 06:49
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 06:45
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 06:42
Re: An infinite debate, Eckard Blumschein, 06:30
New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 13, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 06:01
Re: On fixed points of involutions, approximate version, Simeon Stefanov, 05:23
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, NoraBaron, 04:53
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, proton, 04:50
Re: tensor product twister, Jannick Asmus, 04:48
Re: Zeta Distribution and Pareto Distribution, Nick, 04:21
Re: Magic Square, Mate, 04:17
Re: Infinite system of linear equations, Han de Bruijn, 04:09
Re: Small set theory., Eckard Blumschein, 03:37
Re: Please Explain: How Is 5�F ***NOT*** Three Times Warmer Than 15�F????, Nick, 03:35
Re: Dumb factoring question, Proginoskes, 03:25
Re: Combinatorics and functions, cbrown, 03:20
Re: Dumb factoring question, Nick, 03:17
Re: JSH: My prime counting, speed, jshtarded, 02:39
Re: JSH: My prime counting, speed, jshtarded, 02:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 02:35
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, Robert Israel, 02:35
Creation and Annihilation Operators in QM, Mike, 01:54
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Proginoskes, 01:52
Re: Funny integral, Proginoskes, 01:38
Re: Small set theory., Virgil, 01:35
Re: Infinite system of linear equations, Gottfried Helms, 01:30
Re: Dumb factoring question, Proginoskes, 01:30
Re: number of cycles in digraphs with maximum density, Proginoskes, 01:17
Infinite system of linear equations, Jules, 01:12
Re: ( $$ logic wars $$ ( the chosen one ( re: math as religion ) ) ), galathaea, 01:01
Cut Points, William Elliot, 00:58
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 00:36
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 00:16
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 00:05
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, Igor Khavkine, 00:03
General Introduction of www.SoftwareEr.com, Phoenix, 00:00

November 12, 2006

Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 23:59
Re: JSH: My prime counting, speed, jshturd, 23:56
Re: JSH: Prime counting speed is boring, jshturd, 23:55
Videos about chaos theory and fractals, Gary, 23:54
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, Canaan Banana, 23:31
[] p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, William Elliot, 23:27
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, David Moran, 23:21
Re: The determinant of a matrix, Chip Eastham, 23:15
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Murphy, 22:51
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 22:50
Re: Adjoints, Daniel Mayost, 22:45
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 22:35
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 22:24
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 22:23
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 22:15
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:09
Re: What is the answer of the following integral?, Robert Israel, 22:09
Re: Zeta Distribution and Pareto Distribution, Jonas, 21:52
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, Tim Peters, 21:36
Re: Prime numbers, fishfry, 21:26
Re: Funny integral, Gerry Myerson, 21:18
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Murphy, 21:17
Re: Another Collatz-like function, Gerry Myerson, 21:10
Re: Ordinal based sets., Aatu Koskensilta, 21:08
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Murphy, 21:04
Re: Ordinal based sets., Jason Pawloski, 21:01
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 20:58
Re: Ordinal based sets., Aatu Koskensilta, 20:56
Re: ( $$ logic wars $$ ( political certainty ( re: math as religion ) ) ), Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 20:55
Quantum Gravity as Gauge Theory and Propellantless Propulsion of Space Vehicles, Jack Sarfatti, 20:49
Re: Ordinal based sets., Jason Pawloski, 20:38
Re: Arrgghh -- Semantics and "Mathematical Homonyms" (Watts on second?), Jesse F. Hughes, 20:32
Re: Liouvilles formula, Tuvak, 20:22
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 20:22
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, William Hughes, 20:20
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, jshsucks, 20:16
Re: Ordinal based sets., Aatu Koskensilta, 20:12
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, Rick Decker, 20:09
Re: My prime counting, speed, jshturd, 20:09
Re: Prime counting speed is boring, jshturd, 20:08
Re: Connecting the dots, jshturd, 20:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 19:44
Re: Small set theory., Aatu Koskensilta, 19:43
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 19:40
Re: What is the answer of the following integral?, A N Niel, 19:38
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 19:38
Re: Any graduate program without Bachelor's degree?, A N Niel, 19:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, MoeBlee, 19:28
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 19:26
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 19:21
Re: Small set theory., MoeBlee, 19:06
Re: Small set theory., MoeBlee, 19:03
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 19:02
Re: Small set theory., MoeBlee, 19:00
Re: Ordinal based sets., zuhair, 18:56
Re: Small set theory., MoeBlee, 18:55
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 18:47
Re: Small set theory., MoeBlee, 18:44
Re: An inequality involving sin, Michael Press, 18:40
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 18:39
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, Robert Israel, 18:34
Axioms are preposterous, Clifford Nelson, 18:32
Ordinal based sets., zuhair, 18:23
Re: Prime numbers, Phil Carmody, 18:17
Re: A question about p-adic integers, Rupert, 18:16
Re: Small set theory., Virgil, 18:16
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, William Hughes, 18:14
Re: Small set theory., Virgil, 18:13
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 18:13
inner product spaces 2, jennifer, 18:10
Re: A question about p-adic integers, Jannick Asmus, 18:09
Re: Distance between a point and y = ax^2 + bx + c, David W. Cantrell, 18:06
Re: A question about p-adic integers, Jannick Asmus, 18:06
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 18:05
Re: What is the answer of the following integral?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 18:05
Re: Small set theory., MoeBlee, 18:03
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 18:03
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 18:02
Re: A question about p-adic integers, Rupert, 18:00
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 17:57
Re: JSH: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Richard Tobin, 17:51
Re: analysis with series!, Peter L. Montgomery, 17:48
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 17:47
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, jshsucks, 17:47
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 17:45
Re: What is the answer of the following integral?, Robert Israel, 17:44
Re: A question about p-adic integers, Jannick Asmus, 17:44
Re: Distance between a point and y = ax^2 + bx + c, David W. Cantrell, 17:43
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Rupert, 17:42
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:41
Re: JSH: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Arturo Magidin, 17:38
Re: inner product spaces, Daniel Mayost, 17:37
Re: A question about p-adic integers, Rupert, 17:37
Re: How can I solve negative factorial that now i am sending with this title?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:36
Re: non-injectivity of pullback, Jannick Asmus, 17:35
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, David Marcus, 17:33
Re: JSH: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Richard Tobin, 17:33
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, David Marcus, 17:32
Re: inner product spaces, Robert Israel, 17:31
Re: Math Trek: Designer Decimals, Gerry Myerson, 17:27
Re: Magic Square, Arturo Magidin, 17:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:23
Re: Magic Square, Gerry Myerson, 17:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:13
Validity of an equation, Deep, 17:13
Re: To simplify a product of 16 sines in 5 variables, Thomas Mautsch, 17:10
Re: Prime numbers, Gerry Myerson, 17:08
Re: Problem, Gerry Myerson, 17:01
Re: A problem in statistics, Nick, 17:00
Re: Zeta Distribution and Pareto Distribution, Herman Rubin, 17:00
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 16:52
Adjoints, jennifer, 16:42
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Murphy, 16:39
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 16:38
Re: non-injectivity of pullback, ciao_shake, 16:36
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 16:32
inner product spaces, jennifer, 16:31
Re: A limit stumper, Herman Rubin, 16:27
Re: Zeta Distribution and Pareto Distribution, Nick, 16:26
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 16:25
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 16:21
Re: infinteely many primes ..., jankrihau, 16:17
Re: An infinite debate, RLG, 16:16
Re: Arrgghh -- Semantics and "Mathematical Homonyms" (Watts on second?), Nick, 16:13
Re: Is g=0 a.e.?, TCL, 16:12
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Tim Peters, 16:08
Re: How can I solve negative factorial that now i am sending with this title?, Nick, 15:54
Information theory: entropy decrease on x from knowledge of x+y, Francois Grieu, 15:53
Re: HELP, Michael Haenlein, 15:49
What is the answer of the following integral?, Michael Haenlein, 15:40
Re: p and p^2 + 2 prime => p^3 + 4 prime, raymond manzoni, 15:38
infinteely many primes ..., marcus_b, 15:37
Re: Any graduate program without Bachelor's degree?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 15:32
Re: metric spaces and cauchy, Arturo Magidin, 15:29
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 15:29
Re: Any graduate program without Bachelor's degree?, Herman Rubin, 15:26
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Phil Carmody, 15:22
Re: p and p^2 + 2 prime => p^3 + 4 prime, Kenneth Bull, 15:21
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 15:17
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Nick, 15:16
Re: How can I solve negative factorial that now i am sending with this title?, A N Niel, 15:14
Re: Moebius Band is not homeomorphic with a Torus, Narasimham, 15:13
( $$ logic wars $$ ( political certainty ( re: math as religion ) ) ), galathaea, 15:12
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Tim Peters, 15:08
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 15:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:55
Re: only theorem, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:51
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Arturo Magidin, 14:46
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Tim Peters, 14:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 14:44
Re: Small set theory., Aatu Koskensilta, 14:43
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, Dr. Doctor, 14:42
Re: Math as Religion, Lester Zick, 14:38
Re: Math as Religion, Lester Zick, 14:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:36
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 14:34
Re: Math as Religion, Lester Zick, 14:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 14:28
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:11
Re: Small set theory., Aatu Koskensilta, 14:11
Re: Is g=0 a.e.?, The World Wide Wade, 14:09
Re: Small set theory., Aatu Koskensilta, 14:08
Re: Magic Square, Arturo Magidin, 14:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 14:06
Re: tensor product twister, Timothy Murphy, 13:55
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, jshsucks, 13:45
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 13:40
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 13:38
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 13:38
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, jstevh, 13:32
Re: Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, The Thing, 13:28
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 13:18
Re: non-injectivity of pullback, Jannick Asmus, 13:14
Problem, Narek Saribekyan, 13:01
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 12:59
Question about Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, sg552, 12:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:57
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 12:57
Re: orthogonal compliment, jennifer, 12:55
Re: A question about p-adic integers, Jannick Asmus, 12:54
non-injectivity of pullback, ciao_shake, 12:53
Re: Combinatorics and functions, cbrown, 12:52
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:48
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 12:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 12:46
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 12:43
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Aatu Koskensilta, 12:43
Re: Zeta Distribution and Pareto Distribution, Jonas, 12:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 12:30
Re: Zeta Distribution and Pareto Distribution, kunzmilan, 12:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 12:27
Re: How can I solve negative factorial that now i am sending with this title?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:23
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 12:13
Re: only theorem, Pouya D. Tafti, 12:11
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 12:10
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 12:08
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Nick, 11:59
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 11:58
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 11:35
Re: Prime numbers, jankrihau, 11:26
Re: How can I solve negative factorial that now i am sending with this title?, David W . Cantrell, 11:15
Re: Small set theory., Richard Harter, 11:10
Re: Dumb factoring question, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:08
Re: How can I solve negative factorial that now i am sending with this title?, Fem_beginner_level, 11:08
HELP, hayk, 11:08
HELP, hayk, 11:05
Prime numbers, Student of Math, 11:03
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, David C . Ullrich, 10:57
only theorem, OrhanGOKCE, 10:55
Re: Liouvilles formula, Narasimham, 10:54
nice,erdos,can. math bull, Ashay Burungale, 10:50
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:37
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:33
Re: Modified Zhukovski function, raymond manzoni, 10:32
Re: Zeta Distribution and Pareto Distribution, Jonas, 10:29
Re: How can I solve negative factorial that now i am sending with this title?, The Qurqirish Dragon, 10:27
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:21
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:16
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:11
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, David C . Ullrich, 10:02
Re: How can I solve negative factorial that now i am sending with this title?, Fem_beginner_level, 10:01
How can I solve negative factorial that now i am sending with this title?, Fem_beginner_level, 10:00
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Nam Nguyen, 09:54
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, abo, 09:39
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, William Elliot, 09:36
Re: Dumb factoring question, Nick, 09:27
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 09:10
Re: How to declare integer in mathematica ?, Tomek, 09:10
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 09:08
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Nick, 09:07
Liouvilles formula, Tuvak, 09:05
Urgent question: MCMC in a sparse, large Dirichlet space, Jamaica R., 08:55
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, William Elliot, 08:55
Re: How to declare integer in mathematica ?, David W . Cantrell, 08:52
Re: topology with connected component., mina_world, 08:34
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Nick, 08:30
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Phil Carmody, 08:28
Magic Square, narek . saribekyan, 08:23
Re: what are all the integer numbers n so that 500|7-11n ?, polymedes, 08:20
How to declare integer in mathematica ?, Tomek, 08:18
Re: topology with connected component., mina_world, 08:17
Re: Something for sci.math's amateur mathematicians? (Part 2), kunzmilan, 08:17
Re: Dumb factoring question, Nick, 08:07
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Aatu Koskensilta, 08:07
Re: topology with connected component., William Elliot, 07:53
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, William Elliot, 07:44
Re: number of cycles in digraphs with maximum density, kunzmilan, 07:17
Re: Any induction?, Nick, 06:15
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 06:03
Re: ($$ logic wars $$(political certainty(re: math as religion))), Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 05:50
Re: orthogonal compliment, Pouya D. Tafti, 05:42
( $$ logic wars $$ ( the chosen one ( re: math as religion ) ) ), galathaea, 05:28
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Phil Carmody, 05:19
Re: x(ln(x)), kunzmilan, 05:06
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Proginoskes, 04:58
Re: Zeta Distribution and Pareto Distribution, kunzmilan, 04:46
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Tim Peters, 04:37
Re: p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Wim Benthem, 04:27
Re: Funny integral, bill, 03:50
Re: Q: solution of a set of exponential equations, Gottfried Helms, 03:49
Planes of constant sums, kunzmilan, 03:48
Re: topology with connected component., mina_world, 03:45
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, jankrihau, 03:44
p and p^6 + 6008 prime => is p^(p^p) + 8 p^p + 26 necessarily prime?, Proginoskes, 03:38
Menunda-nunda dan Tergesa-gesa, Abdulloh, 03:24
Re: JSH: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Tim Peters, 03:23
Re: p and p^2 + 2 prime => p^3 + 4 prime, Proginoskes, 03:20
Re: topology with connected component., David Marcus, 03:17
Re: Parametric solutions of Euler Brick?, Proginoskes, 03:16
Re: Parametric solutions of Euler Brick?, Proginoskes, 03:10
looking for games using stopping times and coin tossings, Mike, 03:09
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, Jim Black, 02:57
Re: Parametric solutions of Euler Brick?, Virgil, 02:51
Re: hamiltonian path, evanthh, 02:51
Re: p and p^2 + 2 prime => p^3 + 4 prime, William Elliot, 02:46
topology with connected component., mina_world, 02:31
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, Tim Peters, 02:26
Re: PhD Fellowships in Combinatorial Scientific Computing, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 02:19
Re: Dumb factoring question, Proginoskes, 02:04
Re: Paraordinals&Metaordinals, David Marcus, 02:03
Re: JSH: What are your limits? Asshole., Proginoskes, 02:00
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 01:48
Re: a question about 4 colorings, Proginoskes, 01:46
Re: What are your limits?, Virgil, 01:37
Re: Knights combinatorics., Proginoskes, 01:34
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:33
Re: Funny integral, Proginoskes, 01:33
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:30
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:10
Re: Dumb factoring question, kyle, 01:08
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 01:02
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 00:58
Re: JSH: What are your limits? Asshole., Dr. Doctor, 00:42
Re: JSH: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Arturo Magidin, 00:18
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Arturo Magidin, 00:08

November 11, 2006

Re: Dumb factoring question, David Marcus, 23:31
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 23:16
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 23:11
Re: An inequality involving sin, The World Wide Wade, 23:10
Any induction?, Kenshin, 23:06
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Tim Peters, 23:00
Re: The determinant of a matrix, Chip Eastham, 22:58
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Gib Bogle, 22:52
Dumb factoring question, pil, 22:42
Re: An infinite debate, William Hughes, 22:26
what type of convexity is this?, Mike, 22:21
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 22:17
Re: Paraordinals&Metaordinals, zuhair, 22:07
Re: JSH: Some prime counting facts, facing the swarm, Jesse F. Hughes, 22:06
Re: An infinite debate, William Hughes, 22:05
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Justin, 22:04
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 22:04
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, Justin, 22:02
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, Tim Peters, 22:01
Re: What are your limits?, David Moran, 21:58
Re: ($$ logic wars $$(political certainty(re: math as religion))), Gene Ward Smith, 21:58
Re: What are your limits?, Barry Grouper, 21:57
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, The Ghost In The Machine, 21:55
Re: Paraordinals&Metaordinals, Jesse F. Hughes, 21:54
Google pix, Anton-P, 21:51
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 21:50
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, fishfry, 21:50
($$ logic wars $$(political certainty(re: math as religion))), galathaea, 21:49
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 21:49
Re: Small set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 21:39
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:38
Re: Sum this!, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:35
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, William Hughes, 21:34
Re: Verification: Sequences in the cofinite topology, Butch Malahide, 21:32
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, gjedwards, 21:15
Re: Verification: Sequences in the cofinite topology, William Elliot, 21:12
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 21:06
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 21:02
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:55
Re: An infinite debate, stephen, 20:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 20:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:44
Re: An infinite debate, David Marcus, 20:44
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 20:42
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 20:41
Re: An infinite debate, William Hughes, 20:40
Re: Verification: Sequences in the cofinite topology, The World Wide Wade, 20:37
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:36
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 20:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:32
Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil, 20:28
Re: What are your limits?, The Last Danish Pastry, 20:27
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 20:25
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 20:20
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Nam Nguyen, 20:17
Re: JSH: What are your limits?, jshsucks, 20:16
Re: An infinite debate, Randy Poe, 20:14
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 20:13
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 20:12
JSH: What are your limits?, jstevh, 20:01
Re: JSH: Some prime counting facts, facing the swarm, sg552, 19:58
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, jshsucks, 19:58
Re: JSH: Some prime counting facts, facing the swarm, jstevh, 19:50
Re: Math as Religion, Gene Ward Smith, 19:48
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 19:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, Dik T. Winter, 19:47
Re: JSH: Some prime counting facts, facing the swarm, NoraBaron, 19:47
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 19:45
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 19:39
Re: Math as Religion, Gene Ward Smith, 19:39
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 19:38
Re: p and p^2 + 2 prime => p^3 + 4 prime, Kenneth Bull, 19:37
Re: Q: solution of a set of exponential equations, David W . Cantrell, 19:34
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, gjedwards, 19:29
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, marcus_b, 19:28
Re: Math as Religion, Gene Ward Smith, 19:24
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, gjedwards, 19:24
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 19:24
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, William Hughes, 19:23
Re: dot product magnitudes, William Elliot, 19:22
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 19:19
Re: An infinite debate, David Marcus, 19:18
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Jason Pawloski, 19:17
Re: dot product magnitudes, raymond manzoni, 19:16
Re: An infinite debate, David Marcus, 19:15
Re: Cantor's diagonalization argument, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:13
Re: a question about 4 colorings, barr, 19:13
Re: An infinite debate, David Marcus, 19:10
Re: p and p^2 + 2 prime => p^3 + 4 prime, raymond manzoni, 19:09
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, William Hughes, 19:07
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 19:05
Re: p and p^2 + 2 prime => p^3 + 4 prime, Bart Goddard, 18:59
Budaya Suap ! Hentikanlah Segera, Jelajah Sejati, 18:59
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, jstevh, 18:55
Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes, 18:52
Re: ($$ logic wars $$(a disciple speaks(re: math as religion))), galathaea, 18:45
Re: ($$ logic wars $$(a disciple speaks(re: math as religion))), Gene Ward Smith, 18:45
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, marcus_b, 18:45
Re: An inequality involving sin, Michael Press, 18:39
Re: An inequality involving sin, galathaea, 18:38
($$ logic wars $$(a disciple speaks(re: math as religion))), galathaea, 18:36
dot product magnitudes, Trigger, 18:34
p and p^2 + 2 prime => p^3 + 4 prime, Kenneth Bull, 18:28
Re: Verification: Sequences in the cofinite topology, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 18:24
Re: JSH: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Tim Peters, 18:15
Re: orthogonal compliment, jennifer, 18:14
Re: Periodic solution of differential equation, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:12
Re: orthogonal compliment, jennifer, 18:12
Re: Verification: Sequences in the cofinite topology, barr, 18:12
Re: Paraordinals&Metaordinals, zuhair, 18:09
Re: Math as Religion, Gene Ward Smith, 18:06
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 18:06
Re: Cardinality without choice, zuhair, 18:06
Re: An infinite debate, Tony Orlow, 18:05
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Tim Peters, 18:04
Re: An infinite debate, Tony Orlow, 18:03
Re: An infinite debate, Tony Orlow, 18:01
Re: Math as Religion, Gene Ward Smith, 18:00
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Dr. Doctor, 17:58
Re: Paraordinals&Metaordinals, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:57
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 17:57
Re: mirror symmetry, Michael Press, 17:54
Re: Cardinality without choice, zuhair, 17:54
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 17:51
Re: Zeta Distribution and Pareto Distribution, A N Niel, 17:50
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 17:40
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 17:40
Re: Convergence factors of series, The World Wide Wade, 17:40
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 17:38
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:36
Re: JSH: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Arturo Magidin, 17:36
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:35
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:32
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 17:25
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:23
Re: Is g=0 a.e.?, The World Wide Wade, 17:17
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 17:16
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Rupert, 17:15
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 17:14
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 17:11
Re: JSH: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Tim Peters, 17:09
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 17:08
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Rupert, 17:07
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, No Way, 17:07
New Account, b-l-u-e-d-e-v-i-l, 17:07
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 17:06
Re: Small set theory., David Marcus, 17:05
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 17:04
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:56
Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh, 16:54
Re: Connecting the dots, David Moran, 16:47
Re: x(ln(x)), Dave L. Renfro, 16:37
Re: orthogonal compliment, Pouya D. Tafti, 16:28
Verification: Sequences in the cofinite topology, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:25
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Tim Peters, 16:23
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 16:21
Re: Math as Religion, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 16:11
Re: Math as Religion, David Marcus, 16:11
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 16:04
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, William Hughes, 16:04
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 16:02
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 15:59
Re: JSH: Connecting the dots, Lord Protector, 15:59
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 15:57
Re: An infinite debate, Virgil, 15:56
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, marcus_b, 15:53
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 15:53
Re: Zeta Distribution and Pareto Distribution, Jonas, 15:51
Re: Small set theory., Virgil, 15:50
JSH: Connecting the dots, jstevh, 15:50
Re: JSH: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, Tim Peters, 15:49
Re: Math as Religion, Gene Ward Smith, 15:48
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 15:44
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 15:41
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, William Hughes, 15:40
Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen, 15:39
Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:38
Q: solution of a set of exponential equations, Gottfried Helms, 15:36
Re: Convergence factors of series, Damian Sobota, 15:30
Re: orthogonal compliment, jennifer, 15:29
Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus, 15:29
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, marcus_b, 15:26
Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick, 15:21
Re: Cantor Confusion, Franziska Neugebauer, 15:21
Re: x(ln(x)), sudhir, 15:19
Re: Small set theory., zuhair, 15:15
Re: Prime numbers, counting tells it all, jstevh, 15:12
Re: To simplify a product of 16 sines in 5 variables, CW, 15:12