|
|
Lester Zick wrote:
> On 30 Oct 2006 16:34:04 -0800, "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Please stop misprepresenting what I posted. Your mangled versions are
> >not my own.
> Who gives a flying ?
Perfect.
> >What I posted was:
> >
> >card(x) = the least ordinal equinumerous with x.
>
> Oh so nobody's allowed to define anything using the technique but poor
> little Moe?
I didn't say that. I just asked that you don't post your mangled
versions as if they represent anything *I* said. You say now that you
won't, so that's good news.
> Yeah, yeah, I tell you what Moe: why don't you just stop talking about
> it? I made reference to something you claimed which you can't justify
> according to the posts you've mangled (intentionally it seems) and now
> you're embarrassed about it. You're a big boy. Get over it already.
I have not mangled any posts, intentionally or otherwise.
MoeBlee
|
|