|
|
FrediFizzx wrote:
I think Igor was talking about Sarfatti's ramblings. ;-) But indeed,
neither ST nor Sarfatti have *testable* predictions yet. Hmm... I would
think that if you have a basic entity (like superstrings) making
everything, that their interactional geometry should produce the
Standard Model every time. This is what our Quantum Vacuum Charge
scenario is based on and we make some testable predictions.
Does "testable" mean testable in principle? Is the lack of testablility
untestablity in principle or does it mean we currently lack the means to
test the theory and we might acquire them someday?
Bob Kolker
|
|