Re: Cantor Confusion

Subject:	Re: Cantor Confusion
From:
Date:	31 Oct 2006 12:11:08 -0800
Newsgroups:	sci.math

stephen@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: why I am

> talking about physical problems anyway?  The balls and vase problem
> is not a physical problem.  Mathematics is perfectly capable
> of handling non physical problems, despite your cryptic insistence
> that "mathematics is not independent of physics".

Sure. Case closed. As usual. And that's the end of our debate, huh?

Han de Bruijn

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Cantor Confusion, (continued) Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen Re: Cantor Confusion, Han . deBruijn <= Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus Re: Cantor Confusion, Lester Zick Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus Re: Cantor Confusion, imaginatorium Re: Cantor Confusion, David Marcus Re: Cantor Confusion, imaginatorium Re: Cantor Confusion, Han de Bruijn Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe

Previous by Date:	Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
Next by Date:	Distance between a point and y = ax^2 + bx + c, Magnus
Previous by Thread:	Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen
Next by Thread:	Re: Cantor Confusion, stephen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]