sci.math
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: What's really wrong with string theory?

Subject: Re: What's really wrong with string theory?
From: "Igor"
Date: 31 Oct 2006 10:35:45 -0800
Newsgroups: sci.math, sci.physics, sci.philosophy.tech, sci.physics.particle, sci.physics.relativity
Ben Newsam wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:10:40 GMT, Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > However, that
> >simply means that some continuous symmetry of the action of the string
> >is spontaneously broken inducing a vacuum phase transition of the theory
> >with macro-quantum ODLRO - emergence of a Higgs-type inflation field
> >with one or more Goldstone phases like in a superconductor. Therefore, a
> >string theory in ordinary 3 + 1 space-time may be possible after all.
> >Indeed, curved space-time's renormalizable spin 1 tetrad quantum fields
> >and spin-connections with dark energy and dark matter seem to naturally
> >emerge from the Goldstone phases induced by the tachyon instability. The
> >spin 2 metric field is an emergent entangled composite of pairs of spin
> >1 tetrad fields and torsion fields.
>
> You're making this stuff up as you go along, aren't you? <vbg>

Unfortunately, no.  And it gets even better.  This deep quagmire of
terminology and seemingly empty mathematics still offers nary a single
physical prediction after all these years.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy