| Subject: | Re: Cantor Confusion |
|---|---|
| From: | "MoeBlee" |
| Date: | 31 Oct 2006 10:08:11 -0800 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.math |
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Every path is related to two edges which are not related to any other > path. And that is easy enough to see. I can't comment since, other than ostensively, you won't define the relation you have in mind when you say 'are not related'. I offered to be an audience for your argument if you would define your terms, but you decline. MoeBlee |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sides and angles in a triangle, Narasimham |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: An uncountable countable set, stephen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |