sci.math
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Cantor Confusion

Subject: Re: Cantor Confusion
From: Virgil
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:34:00 -0600
Newsgroups: sci.math
In article <Y3uTg.1861$3E2.1791@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
 "Poker Joker" <Poker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> "Virgil" <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
> news:virgil-A44A2E.01004230092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > In article <YDmTg.25600$QT.1073@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > "Poker Joker" <Poker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> "Virgil" <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:virgil-9C1609.21071129092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> > It is in mathematics. Once a proof for any list is established, it
> >> > covers every list.
> >>
> >> This list doesn't contain 4:
> >>
> >> 1
> >> 2
> >> 3
> >>
> >> Proof:
> >>
> >> The 1st number isn't 4.
> >> The 2nd number isn't 4.
> >> The 3rd number isn't 4.
> >> That list does't contain 4
> >>
> >> Therefore, Virgil believes that in mathematics, no
> >> list contains 4.
> >
> > As it is PJ's proof, it must be PJ's theorem.
> > I lay no claim to other's works.
> 
> How could you?  You've never done any work. 

Never claimed to have done any. But I can and have appreciated the good 
work of others, which PJ does not.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy