|
|
"Poker Joker" <Poker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3HmTg.25601$QT.205@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1159581865.120392.117490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> Like I said, you've not refuted the uncountability of the reals nor
>> Arturo's point to which you originally responded.
>
> I never tried to refute the uncountability of the reals. Too bad
> you've never been able to understand that.
>
No, but you introduced a specious point that seemed to support this argument
though.
You said that for any real x exists y such that x/y=0.
This statement is false, at least within standard arithmetic, as you point
out.
Cantor is different in that the statement is true, and easily proved.
|
|