|
|
"Virgil" <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:virgil-A44A2E.01004230092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <YDmTg.25600$QT.1073@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Poker Joker" <Poker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> "Virgil" <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:virgil-9C1609.21071129092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> > It is in mathematics. Once a proof for any list is established, it
>> > covers every list.
>>
>> This list doesn't contain 4:
>>
>> 1
>> 2
>> 3
>>
>> Proof:
>>
>> The 1st number isn't 4.
>> The 2nd number isn't 4.
>> The 3rd number isn't 4.
>> That list does't contain 4
>>
>> Therefore, Virgil believes that in mathematics, no
>> list contains 4.
>
> As it is PJ's proof, it must be PJ's theorem.
> I lay no claim to other's works.
How could you? You've never done any work.
|
|