| Subject: | Re: Cantor Confusion |
|---|---|
| From: | "Poker Joker" |
| Date: | Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:55:11 GMT |
| Newsgroups: | sci.math |
"Virgil" <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:virgil-64037E.00565930092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > In article <GmmTg.25597$QT.21130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > "Poker Joker" <Poker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> "Virgil" <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message > >> > Since Poker Joker has has no legitimate answer I am not surprised that >> > he chickened out. >> >> Since you're a moron you deserve nothing. > > Argumentum ad hominem achieves nothing but revealing the incapacity of > the arguer. That's exactly what you do in every thread you've ever posted on. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Cantor Confusion, Poker Joker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Cantor Confusion, Alan Morgan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |