|
|
"Proginoskes" <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1159600047.575524.128670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Tim Peters wrote:
>> [jstevh@xxxxxxx]
>> [...]
>> For the rest, I must say this is one of the clearest posts I've
>> seen from
>> you in years. I don't know what you think the /point/ of it is,
>> but at
>> least most of it was intelligible.
>
> Yes, it's clear he _doesn't_ know what a ring is. My attempt at
> educating him (posting the definition) seems to have gone unknown.
As Wilma Scranton said 5 years ago:
"James, what you know about rings could be written in the margin of a
postage stamp ... in big letters"
He is evidently rather a slow learner.
The above quote is from a chat room conversation with James (using the
nick "FlatRings"):
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_frm/thread/47d187815d6a1ae5/cb949fd79c3c469f
or
tinylink.com/?L2NU1dbOrw">http://tinylink.com/?L2NU1dbOrw
--
Clive Tooth
www.clivetooth.dk
Stock photos:
submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=61771">http://submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=61771
|
|