| Subject: | Re: Lipschitz and Locally Lipschitz |
|---|---|
| From: | The World Wide Wade |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:22:01 -0700 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.math |
In article <1159542238.788430.263750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jason Pawloski" <jpawloski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Let f:(0,1] -> R be defined as f(x) = 1/x, and g:[-1,1] -> R be defined > as g(x) = (x)^(1/3). Am I right in saying neither of these functions is > Lipschitz, f(x) is locally Lipschitz, and g(x) is not even locally > Lipschitz? Yes. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Cardinality: a definition, MoeBlee |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why is this limit 0?, The World Wide Wade |
| Previous by Thread: | Lipschitz and Locally Lipschitz, Jason Pawloski |
| Next by Thread: | GL(n,Fp), dince24 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |