sci.math (date)
July 31, 2006
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Robert Low, 16:05
- Re: What is a curve of genus 0?, Gene Ward Smith, 16:04
- Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?, Dave L. Renfro, 16:03
- Re: even/odd analogy for ternary?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:51
- Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 15:43
- Re: " f(1/x) +2*f(x) +3*x = f(2/x) , x<> 0 , stable forms", Robert Israel, 15:27
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Han . deBruijn, 15:23
- Re: What is a curve of genus 0?, Dave Rusin, 15:20
- Re: Mathieu Group M24, PaulHjelmstad, 15:16
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:15
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 15:13
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Dave Rusin, 14:58
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:36
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 14:34
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 14:32
- Reference for chain rule application to Bessel function derivatives, 1940LaSalle, 14:23
- Re: Field Definition, Arturo Magidin, 14:09
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:58
- Re: Field Definition, Pubkeybreaker, 13:58
- Re: distribution theory, gilraen, 13:47
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 13:43
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, John Schutkeker, 13:41
- " f(1/x) +2*f(x) +3*x = f(2/x) , x<> 0 , stable forms", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 13:25
- Re: even/odd analogy for ternary?, Robert Israel, 13:17
- Re: Finite sum of terms, Patrick Coilland, 13:07
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 13:07
- Re: Are these equations solvable with 2 unknowns?, Tim Peters, 13:04
- Re: Field Definition, Rob Arthan, 12:56
- Re: Finite sum of terms, lucas, 12:53
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, MoeBlee, 12:46
- Re: questions about 1-form and gradient, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez, 12:25
- Re: Field Definition, Arturo Magidin, 12:24
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Daniel Grubb, 12:22
- Re: Computing stochastic integrals, ArtflDodgr, 12:21
- Re: even/odd analogy for ternary?, Jeremy Targett, 12:18
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 12:18
- Re: an easy problem but it confused me, muratad, 12:13
- Re: Field Definition, Lee Rudolph, 12:08
- Re: Field Definition, Lee Rudolph, 12:00
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 11:59
- Re: Field Definition, Arturo Magidin, 11:42
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 11:26
- Field Definition, Pubkeybreaker, 11:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 11:19
- Are these equations solvable with 2 unknowns?, Dan, 11:09
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Herman Rubin, 11:04
- On P. Woit's "Not Even Wrong", Frank W. Steiner, 10:31
- Re: discrete math problem?, Pubkeybreaker, 10:23
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 10:20
- Re: discrete math problem?, deemanw, 10:15
- Re: discrete math problem?, karl, 09:58
- Mathieu Group M24, PaulHjelmstad, 09:49
- Request for participation in a web-based survey on the concept of mathematical knowledge, Eva Wilhelmus, 09:49
- discrete math problem?, deemanw, 09:46
- Re: What is a curve of genus 0?, Lee Rudolph, 09:42
- Re: What is a curve of genus 0?, Lee Rudolph, 09:33
- Re: What is a curve of genus 0?, Denis Feldmann, 09:10
- Re: mathematica or maple?, G. A. Edgar, 09:10
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 09:08
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Denis Feldmann, 09:04
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Lasse, 08:59
- Re: questions about 1-form and gradient, Lee Rudolph, 08:51
- Re: mathematica or maple?, Caonima, 08:51
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, georgie, 08:49
- Computing stochastic integrals, Konrad Viltersten, 08:45
- Re: Help with this analysis problem (Riemann integration), David C . Ullrich, 08:10
- Re: Help with this analysis problem (Riemann integration), qophee, 07:42
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, William Elliot, 07:36
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 07:32
- Re: What is a curve of genus 0?, Timothy Murphy, 07:12
- Re: noncommutative algebra book recommendation?, heidi . dahl, 06:51
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Timothy Murphy, 06:48
- Please help..., s3056820, 06:39
- Re: What is a curve of genus 0?, andymorrison549, 06:27
- Re: What is a curve of genus 0?, Denis Feldmann, 06:14
- Re: Question on: Generators of Sn, Timothy Murphy, 06:14
- What is a curve of genus 0?, andymorrison549, 05:58
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 05:44
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 31, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:40
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 05:17
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Robert Low, 05:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 04:53
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Stan Sykora, 04:34
- Re: mathematica or maple?, , 04:33
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Rainer Rosenthal, 04:22
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Stan Sykora, 04:09
- Re: Highest quality KBPS I can put into 1 gigabyte? (73 minutes), Jeroen, 03:47
- Re: mathematica or maple?, S. Janssens, 03:36
- Re: Nothing has more than 2 square roots :), Bill Dubuque, 03:31
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Proginoskes, 03:21
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Proginoskes, 03:16
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Proginoskes, 03:12
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 03:09
- Re: mathematica or maple?, Proginoskes, 03:03
- Re: an easy problem but it confused me, Proginoskes, 03:01
- Re: even/odd analogy for ternary?, James Dow Allen, 02:58
- Re: Why are we here?, Proginoskes, 02:52
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Helmut Richter, 02:50
- Help with this analysis problem (Riemann integration), Snis Pilbor, 02:40
- Question on: Generators of Sn, Dhara, 02:18
- Re: Infinte sets; was: Re: Hartogs' Lemma, William Elliot, 01:57
- Re: even/odd analogy for ternary?, Robert Israel, 01:39
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 01:31
- Re: even/odd analogy for ternary?, Bill Taylor, 01:29
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 01:21
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 01:19
- Re: questions about 1-form and gradient, mathlover, 01:06
- ANN: Call for papers, qophee, 01:05
- Re: even/odd analogy for ternary?, Gene Ward Smith, 00:45
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Denis Feldmann, 00:26
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 00:23
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 00:06
- Re: distribution theory, Omega Cubed, 00:04
- Re: Help me Count to 10, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
July 30, 2006
- Re: even/odd analogy for ternary?, Jeremy Targett, 23:55
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Gerry Myerson, 23:34
- Highest quality KBPS I can put into 1 gigabyte? (73 minutes), John Maloney, 23:31
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 23:20
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Dik T. Winter, 22:43
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 22:40
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Dik T. Winter, 22:35
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Dik T. Winter, 22:24
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 22:15
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Dave Rusin, 21:53
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Dorian Lidell, 21:49
- Re: even/odd analogy for ternary?, Robert Israel, 21:45
- Re: mathematica or maple?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:44
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 21:39
- Re: an easy problem but it confused me, Gib Bogle, 21:23
- Re: Nothing has more than 2 square roots :), W. Dale Hall, 21:17
- Re: A limit question, Gerry Myerson, 21:16
- Re: mathematica or maple?, glenn, 21:16
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Gerry Myerson, 21:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 21:06
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, Jack, 20:54
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, zr, 20:52
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, zr, 20:50
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Robert Israel, 20:24
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 20:21
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 19:57
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 19:49
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 19:43
- Re: an easy problem but it confused me, W. Dale Hall, 19:39
- Re: an easy problem but it confused me, W. Dale Hall, 19:37
- Re: math, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 19:36
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 19:22
- Lord of The Ring Singularity, Jack Sarfatti, 19:06
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, ytyourclothes, 18:59
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Ioannis, 18:54
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Gene Ward Smith, 18:53
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Gene Ward Smith, 18:49
- even/odd analogy for ternary?, Jeremy Targett, 18:35
- Re: NOT SPAM, All About Amateurs Forum, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 18:26
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Rainer Rosenthal, 18:22
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Jack Campin - bogus address, 18:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, ytyourclothes, 18:21
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, T.H. Ray, 18:14
- Re: Nothing has more than 2 square roots :), Rainer Rosenthal, 18:12
- Re: Why are we here?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 18:08
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Virgil, 18:08
- Re: Finite sum of terms, Virgil, 18:03
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, zr, 18:00
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Barb Knox, 17:58
- Re: Do The Math: Save Gas By Driving Slower, ytyourclothes, 17:49
- Re: Help me Count to 10, acidcrashguy, 17:34
- an easy problem but it confused me, muratad, 17:23
- Re: Nothing has more than 2 square roots :), Dave Rusin, 17:08
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, Mitch, 16:19
- Re: Finite sum of terms, A N Niel, 16:06
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:06
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Herman Rubin, 15:55
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Stan Sykora, 15:44
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:28
- Re: A limit question, Ronald Bruck, 15:27
- Re: Nothing has more than 2 square roots :), W. Dale Hall, 15:26
- Re: Finite sum of terms, Virgil, 15:09
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:51
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:44
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:43
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, herbzet, 14:36
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, herbzet, 14:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 14:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 14:31
- Re: Sections parallel to Generators of an Oblique Cone, Robert Israel, 14:28
- Re: Help me Count to 10, amzoti, 14:07
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Helmut Richter, 14:06
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:05
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:02
- Re: an easy problem but it confused me, Randy Poe, 13:48
- Re: questions about 1-form and gradient, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez, 13:39
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Randy Poe, 13:37
- Re: Help me Count to 10, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: lowest eigenpair of small tridiagonal Hermitian matrices, Ron Shepard, 12:23
- Re: mathematica or maple?, A N Niel, 12:19
- Re: Finite sum of terms, G. A. Edgar, 12:16
- Re: Help me Count to 10, pf . buonsante, 11:59
- Re: Parallel methods for matrix decomposition?, Marc Reinig, 11:53
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, jankrihau, 11:28
- Re: Learning set theory; was: Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Dave L. Renfro, 11:11
- Re: Scalar multiplication in Maple, TCL, 11:00
- Scalar multiplication in Maple, TCL, 10:56
- Re: Help me Count to 10, zolaman, 10:38
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, T.H. Ray, 10:37
- Infinte sets; was: Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 10:28
- Re: Help me Count to 10, Denis Feldmann, 10:25
- Re: Finite sum of terms, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 10:08
- Re: Help me Count to 10, mathedman, 10:08
- Re: Why are we here?, mathedman, 10:02
- Re: an easy problem but it confused me, amzoti, 09:52
- Re: an easy problem but it confused me, amzoti, 09:52
- Help me Count to 10, amzoti, 09:40
- an easy problem but it confused me, muratad, 09:34
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 09:34
- mathematica or maple?, deemanw, 09:23
- Re: Finite sum of terms, Patrick Coilland, 09:05
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:00
- GRE exams preparation, tabby . wamae, 08:56
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, Paulo Matos, 08:54
- Re: Sections parallel to Generators of an Oblique Cone, Narasimham, 08:43
- Re: Finite sum of terms, lucas, 08:39
- Re: Searching google groups, with more on Re: Hartogs' Lemma, William Elliot, 07:58
- Re: Why are we here?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:57
- Re: Finite sum of terms, William Elliot, 07:54
- Re: Nothing has more than 2 square roots :), Rainer Rosenthal, 07:36
- Finite sum of terms, lucas, 07:30
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Phil Carmody, 07:11
- Re: help with percentages, A N Niel, 07:05
- Re: lowest eigenpair of small tridiagonal Hermitian matrices, pf . buonsante, 06:56
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Timothy Murphy, 06:11
- Re: help with percentages, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 06:09
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 06:06
- lowest eigenpair of small tridiagonal Hermitian matrices, pf . buonsante, 06:06
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, sttscitrans, 06:05
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 06:04
- Re: algebra with exercise.., William Elliot, 06:02
- Re: Learning set theory; was: Re: Hartogs' Lemma, William Elliot, 05:55
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, William Elliot, 05:49
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, LauLuna, 05:32
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, LauLuna, 05:27
- Re: Mikhail Y. Suslin and Lebesgue's error, William Elliot, 05:22
- Re: help with percentages, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 04:53
- Re: A limit question, Wynn, 03:55
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 03:01
- test, zolaman, 02:53
- Re: distribution theory, Larry Hammick, 02:29
- Re: NOT SPAM, All About Amateurs Forum, zolaman, 02:15
- Re: Nothing has more than 2 square roots :), Bill Dubuque, 02:13
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 02:09
- Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, Joshua Zelinsky, 02:07
- Re: sequence and induction question?, Denis Feldmann, 01:50
- math, ghasem . esmati, 01:34
- Re: NOT SPAM, All About Amateurs Forum, klohunt, 01:30
- Re: Why are we here?, Proginoskes, 01:29
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:21
- Re: More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), William Elliot, 01:18
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Proginoskes, 01:16
- sequence and induction question?, deemanw, 01:14
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Denis Feldmann, 01:11
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, William Elliot, 01:06
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, William Elliot, 01:04
- Re: Why are we here?, William Elliot, 00:55
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 00:42
- Re: A limit question, Ronald Bruck, 00:42
- Re: A limit question, William Elliot, 00:35
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:02
July 29, 2006
- Re: A question on Maple, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 22:59
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 22:57
- NOT SPAM, All About Amateurs Forum, Satinkisses2004, 22:47
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 22:43
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 22:33
- Re: A limit question, Wynn, 22:29
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 22:28
- A limit question, Wynn, 22:26
- Re: Cauchy-riemann hypothesis superfluous, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 22:25
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 22:25
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 22:24
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 22:14
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 22:14
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Virgil, 22:13
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 22:06
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 22:05
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 21:56
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 21:47
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Rick Decker, 21:34
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 21:28
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, zr, 21:23
- Re: Nothing has more than 2 square roots :), Larry Hammick, 21:18
- Why are we here?, sphampe, 21:12
- Re: Nothing has more than 2 square roots :), Virgil, 20:59
- Re: Nothing has more than 2 square roots :), Virgil, 20:54
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 20:53
- Re: Nothing has more than 2 square roots :), Gene Ward Smith, 20:43
- Nothing has more than 2 square roots :), Larry Hammick, 20:32
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Dik T. Winter, 20:25
- Re: V = L, Rupert, 20:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 19:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 19:52
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 19:49
- Re: More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), Dave L. Renfro, 19:48
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 19:47
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 19:34
- Re: Mikhail Y. Suslin and Lebesgue's error, Dave L. Renfro, 19:33
- OT:C-SPAN this Saturday, July 29th at 8 pm EDT, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:20
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 19:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 18:57
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:42
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Virgil, 18:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:25
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:23
- distribution theory, gilraen, 18:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:22
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:21
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Lester Zick, 18:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Chris Menzel, 18:18
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, zr, 18:04
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 18:01
- Re: Some ambiguities about the Busy Beaver sequence., Ted Hwa, 17:51
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, david petry, 17:48
- Re: help with percentages, bert, 17:48
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 17:48
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Robert Low, 17:41
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 17:38
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Robert Low, 17:37
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 17:36
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 17:31
- Re: help with percentages, john, 17:15
- Re: Network (graph) construction problem, Matthias Knelangen, 17:15
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 17:07
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 17:06
- Re: help with percentages, N. Silver, 16:57
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 16:56
- Re: help with percentages, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:56
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 16:50
- Re: Testing for run of luck - please explain., bryanjugglercryptographer, 16:50
- help with percentages, john, 16:49
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Proginoskes, 16:33
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Proginoskes, 16:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 16:29
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Proginoskes, 16:27
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Han . deBruijn, 16:07
- Re: Recognizing Straight Lines, Han . deBruijn, 15:59
- Re: Recognizing Straight Lines, Han . deBruijn, 15:52
- Re: Testing for run of luck - please explain., dwickford, 15:50
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:50
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:47
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, suprhax0r52, 15:38
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:34
- Some ambiguities about the Busy Beaver sequence., ram . rachum, 15:29
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:26
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Timothy Murphy, 15:20
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:16
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 15:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 15:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 15:10
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, sttscitrans, 14:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Chris Menzel, 14:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 14:36
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:31
- Mikhail Y. Suslin and Lebesgue's error, Dave L. Renfro, 14:21
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), Aatu Koskensilta, 14:05
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 13:51
- Re: More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), G. A. Edgar, 13:26
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 13:23
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, A N Niel, 13:21
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, Phil Carmody, 13:06
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 13:00
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, Phil Carmody, 12:55
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 12:54
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:50
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 12:43
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, Jack, 12:38
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 12:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 12:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:17
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:14
- Re: algebra with exercise.., mina_world, 12:14
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 12:13
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 12:11
- Re: How many ordinals?, Aatu Koskensilta, 12:00
- Re: algebra with exercise.., José Carlos Santos, 11:58
- Re: Learning set theory; was: Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Aatu Koskensilta, 11:54
- Re: algebra with exercise.., mina_world, 11:51
- Re: algebra with exercise.., José Carlos Santos, 11:42
- Learning set theory; was: Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:38
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, David W. Cantrell, 11:32
- algebra with exercise.., mina_world, 11:16
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Robert Low, 11:11
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 11:10
- Searching google groups, with more on Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 10:27
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, Timothy Murphy, 10:26
- range of a certain 2nd order differential operator, pkg, 09:45
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, fiesh, 09:44
- questions about 1-form and gradient, mathlover, 09:42
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), Aatu Koskensilta, 09:17
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, John Schutkeker, 09:17
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236), Aatu Koskensilta, 09:15
- Re: Generating N! permutation, Peter Webb, 09:02
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, stush, 08:54
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Aatu Koskensilta, 08:20
- Re: a^2+b^2 = (10^n)^2, titus_piezas, 08:09
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 08:04
- haro folks, zolaman, 08:03
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Denis Feldmann, 07:59
- Re: Fourier Series and Gibbs and integration..., David C . Ullrich, 07:46
- Re: a^2+b^2 = (10^n)^2, titus_piezas, 07:45
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, William Elliot, 07:13
- Re: More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), William Elliot, 06:46
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Robert Low, 06:44
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Robert Low, 06:39
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, William Elliot, 06:17
- Re: More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), G. A. Edgar, 05:45
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, William Elliot, 05:39
- Re: A question on Maple, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 05:07
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, Phil Carmody, 04:30
- A question on Maple, TCL, 04:10
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 03:55
- Re: A combinatorial identity, Stan Sykora, 03:50
- Re: a^2+b^2 = (10^n)^2, Phil Carmody, 03:43
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, William Elliot, 03:40
- I'm paying for college, what will you do with the money?, decka1121, 02:37
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 02:27
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, John Schutkeker, 01:43
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Proginoskes, 01:41
- Re: Short Proof of Steinberg's Conjecture? Was: Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:31
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, MoeBlee, 01:12
- Re: More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), William Elliot, 00:59
- Re: a^2+b^2 = (10^n)^2, titus_piezas, 00:25
July 28, 2006
- Re: a^2+b^2 = (10^n)^2, Proginoskes, 23:55
- Re: a^2+b^2 = (10^n)^2, titus_piezas, 23:54
- Re: Generating N! permutation, Proginoskes, 23:53
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 23:43
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:40
- Re: a^2+b^2 = (10^n)^2, titus_piezas, 23:37
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Proginoskes, 23:33
- Re: enumerating the rationals in simplest form with no repeats, Russell Easterly, 23:15
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Proginoskes, 23:00
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Proginoskes, 22:54
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Proginoskes, 22:52
- Re: More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), Jonathan Hoyle, 22:45
- multisection for amateur mathematicians, galathaea, 22:06
- Re: Comments on a post to FOM, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:26
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, stevefourier, 20:28
- Re: Short Proof of Steinberg's Conjecture? Was: Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 19:58
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 19:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 19:46
- Re: Short Proof of Steinberg's Conjecture? Was: Re: Four Color Theorem, Dik T. Winter, 19:40
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 19:36
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Dik T. Winter, 19:29
- Re: question with 0/0., David W . Cantrell, 19:15
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 19:11
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 19:09
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 19:01
- Re: Should I learn Russian?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:43
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 18:41
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 18:32
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Richard Mathar, 18:22
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 18:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george, 18:16
- Re: Normal vs. Separable Extensions, barr, 18:02
- Re: Worst convex region for inscribing a large triangle?, Keith A. Lewis, 17:54
- Re: Integrating over Voronoi cells, Roy Stogner, 17:45
- Re: More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), Dave L. Renfro, 17:42
- Fourier Series and Gibbs and integration..., Michael, 17:40
- Should I learn Russian?, suprhax0r52, 17:36
- Re: More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), Jonathan Hoyle, 17:34
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 17:31
- Re: Integrating over Voronoi cells, don, 17:26
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 17:25
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave L. Renfro, 17:21
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Robert Israel, 17:15
- Re: question with 0/0., David R Tribble, 17:08
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, Jack, 16:58
- Re: More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), Dave L. Renfro, 16:58
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, Jack, 16:56
- Handy expression calculator, janne, 16:54
- Limited divisibility of x^n + y^n + c^n by n^p for n odd primes, Roman B. Binder, 16:37
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Badger, 16:28
- Integrating over Voronoi cells, Garrett Baird, 16:05
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave L. Renfro, 15:58
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 15:22
- Re: Who introduced "convex functions"?, A N Niel, 15:00
- Re: question with 0/0., Randy Poe, 14:41
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:23
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:20
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Herman Rubin, 14:10
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Denis Feldmann, 14:04
- Re: question with 0/0., David W . Cantrell, 14:00
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, arana.v, 13:56
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 13:53
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 13:40
- Re: More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), G. A. Edgar, 13:35
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:27
- Re: Solution of PDE, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:22
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Denis Feldmann, 13:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:22
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, Mitch, 13:03
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Chris Menzel, 12:48
- Re: Parallel methods for matrix decomposition?, Jeremy Boden, 12:35
- Re: From: Dave L. Renfro <renfr1dl@xxxxxxxxx>, Aatu Koskensilta, 12:34
- Re: More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), Dave L. Renfro, 12:29
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, Mitch, 12:24
- Number of Hamilton cycles and paths for the Platonic solids, csl, 12:22
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 12:20
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave L. Renfro, 12:19
- a, Rules, 12:07
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, The Qurqirish Dragon, 12:04
- Re: Averages???, The Qurqirish Dragon, 11:41
- Re: a^2+b^2 = (10^n)^2, The Qurqirish Dragon, 11:28
- More on Souslin (= analytic) sets (was: V = L), Ulysse from CH, 11:22
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Chip Eastham, 10:55
- Parallel methods for matrix decomposition?, veg_all, 10:42
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 10:27
- Re: Generating N! permutation, Peter Webb, 10:24
- Ubiquitous mathematical objects: Why?, ss54, 09:46
- Re: to transforme a vector into a matrix, michele de meo, 09:29
- Re: Who introduced "convex functions"?, alex . lupas, 09:16
- Re: to transforme a vector into a matrix, Torsten Hennig, 08:59
- Re: to transforme a vector into a matrix, Michael Orion, 08:58
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Robert Low, 08:45
- Re: to transforme a vector into a matrix, Robert Low, 08:42
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Robert Low, 08:40
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, John Schutkeker, 08:36
- Re: to transforme a vector into a matrix, michele de meo, 08:33
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, John Schutkeker, 08:33
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, fiesh, 08:28
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Pubkeybreaker, 08:27
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Pubkeybreaker, 08:27
- Re: Hartogs' Lemma, Denis Feldmann, 08:26
- Re: Length of a curve, David C . Ullrich, 08:19
- Re: V = L, G. A. Edgar, 08:10
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, A N Niel, 08:07
- Hartogs' Lemma, William Elliot, 07:59
- Re: net convergence in weak* topology, David C . Ullrich, 07:58
- Re: ? U*U', David C . Ullrich, 07:48
- Re: complete metric space and quotient spaces, William Elliot, 07:02
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, T.H. Ray, 06:46
- Re: enumerating the rationals in simplest form with no repeats, thattommyhall, 06:44
- Re: to transforme a vector into a matrix, Torsten Hennig, 06:40
- Re: enumerating the rationals in simplest form with no repeats, Mike Kelly, 06:11
- Re: enumerating the rationals in simplest form with no repeats, Patrick Coilland, 06:09
- Re: Solution of PDE, moloy_kb, 05:51
- enumerating the rationals in simplest form with no repeats, thattommyhall, 05:36
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Robert Low, 05:26
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, Boris Novikov, 05:18
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Robert Low, 05:17
- Re: Was ist das "Calculation Management", The Dougster, 05:15
- Re: " f(f(x) +x - 1) + f(x) = 2 , how many solutions ? ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 04:54
- to transforme a vector into a matrix, michele de meo, 04:42
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, Larry Hammick, 04:36
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 04:14
- Re: Averages???, jt64, 04:08
- Re: Averages???, bert, 04:04
- Re: V = L, Ulysse from CH, 04:03
- Re: Solution of PDE, moloy_kb, 03:45
- Re: V = L, William Elliot, 03:36
- Re: V = L, William Elliot, 03:35
- Re: a^2+b^2 = (10^n)^2, titus_piezas, 03:06
- Re: Who introduced "convex functions"?, zei2006q1, 03:02
- Re: a^2+b^2 = (10^n)^2, titus_piezas, 03:01
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 02:59
- Re: a^2+b^2 = (10^n)^2, jhnrmsdn, 02:47
- Length of a curve, Julien Santini, 02:46
- Re: Laplace equation within non-coordinate boundaries, Torsten Hennig, 02:44
- Re: Who introduced "convex functions"?, José Carlos Santos, 02:35
- Re: Averages???, fishfry, 02:30
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 01:51
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Proginoskes, 01:50
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, Proginoskes, 01:45
- a^2+b^2 = (10^n)^2, titus_piezas, 01:36
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, herbzet, 01:36
- Who introduced "convex functions"?, zei2006q1, 01:33
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, herbzet, 01:30
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, herbzet, 01:29
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:22
- Re: Beat area for amateur mathematicians, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:20
- Re: Short Proof of Steinberg's Conjecture? Was: Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:14
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Gene Ward Smith, 01:05
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, zr, 01:04
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Robert Israel, 00:53
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, herbzet, 00:47
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, herbzet, 00:42
- ? Why Frobenius norm decrease, Cheng Cosine, 00:41
- Re: Solution of PDE, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 00:39
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, herbzet, 00:36
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, herbzet, 00:34
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, herbzet, 00:28
- Re: Averages???, jt64, 00:04
July 27, 2006
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 23:36
- Solution of PDE, moloy_kb, 23:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 23:22
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 23:22
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 23:07
- Beat area for amateur mathematicians, stevefourier, 23:06
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 23:06
- Re: Averages???, Ronald Bruck, 22:40
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 21:58
- Re: Averages???, Gerry Myerson, 21:56
- Re: question with 0/0., David W . Cantrell, 21:51
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Badger, 21:37
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 21:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 21:01
- Averages???, Mike DeAngelis, 20:55
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 20:47
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 20:27
- Re: Laplace equation within non-coordinate boundaries, Robert Israel, 20:26
- Re: Short Proof of Steinberg's Conjecture? Was: Re: Four Color Theorem, Dik T. Winter, 20:23
- Re: Exact values for the trig functions, Jason Pawloski, 20:19
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 20:15
- Exact values for the trig functions, arana.v, 20:10
- Re: Generating N! permutation- Johnson-Trotter, JEMebius, 20:08
- Re: Question About Negative Numbers Raised to Rational Powers, Dik T. Winter, 20:01
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 20:00
- Re: Generating N! permutation, Hugo Pfoertner, 19:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:54
- Re: Testing for run of luck - please explain., bryanjugglercryptographer, 19:52
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 19:49
- Re: Combinatorial design problem (making teams that are sufficiently different), Proginoskes, 19:41
- Re: Generating N! permutation, Proginoskes, 19:39
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:36
- Re: Short Proof of Steinberg's Conjecture? Was: Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 19:30
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 19:30
- Re: question with 0/0., David W . Cantrell, 19:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:25
- Re: Generating N! permutation, carlos, 19:24
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 19:22
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Proginoskes, 19:06
- Re: question with 0/0., David R Tribble, 19:05
- Re: Algebraic topology help, W. Dale Hall, 18:53
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Rupert, 18:49
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 18:47
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 18:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 18:42
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 18:39
- net convergence in weak* topology, omer7380, 18:29
- Re: Algebraic topology help, alex kim, 18:21
- Re: Ant moves on a Box, Philippe 92, 18:18
- Re: Worst convex region for inscribing a large triangle?, David W . Cantrell, 18:12
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 18:05
- Re: Ito's formulae for path dependent functions of diffusion process?, Michael, 18:01
- Re: Combinatorial design problem (making teams that are sufficiently different), Dave Rusin, 17:56
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 17:49
- Re: Testing for run of luck - please explain., dwickford, 17:35
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 17:18
- Re: Blackberry Induction, Rick Decker, 17:03
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 16:29
- Re: Algebraic topology help, W. Dale Hall, 16:29
- Re: Generating N! permutation, marcus_b, 16:29
- Re: question with 0/0., David Kastrup, 16:26
- Re: Help me with basic homology group, Jyrki Lahtonen, 16:25
- Re: question with 0/0., David Kastrup, 16:22
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 16:11
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 16:11
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 16:07
- Re: Blackberry Induction, Phil Carmody, 16:06
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 16:00
- Algebraic topology help, alex kim, 15:58
- Re: question with 0/0., Tom, 15:42
- Re: question with 0/0., jt64, 15:38
- Re: ? expression of soln to sys ODEs, Robert Israel, 15:37
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:34
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 15:33
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 15:32
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 15:15
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave L. Renfro, 15:14
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Craig Feinstein, 15:14
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 15:08
- Re: Sections parallel to Generators of an Oblique Cone, Robert Israel, 15:08
- Re: Was ist das "Calculation Management", porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:03
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave L. Renfro, 15:03
- Re: Properties of the sum of two random variables, johannes . bruder, 15:00
- Re: " f(f(x) +x - 1) + f(x) = 2 , how many solutions ? ", Robert Israel, 14:59
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 14:54
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:49
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 14:39
- Re: question with 0/0., Robert Low, 14:38
- Re: Generating N! permutation, Dave Seaman, 14:25
- Re: Normal vs. Separable Extensions, Arturo Magidin, 14:22
- Re: Generating N! permutation, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez, 14:22
- Generating N! permutation, Ari, 14:12
- Re: N-integer Levi-Civita, Ari, 14:10
- Normal vs. Separable Extensions, vedmundson, 14:07
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 14:02
- Re: question with 0/0., Tom, 14:02
- Re: " f(f(x) +x - 1) + f(x) = 2 , how many solutions ? ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 13:46
- Re: Properties of the sum of two random variables, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:25
- Re: Ito's formulae for path dependent functions of diffusion process?, ArtflDodgr, 13:23
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, odin, 13:15
- Re: fourier series question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:12
- Re: Properties of the sum of two random variables, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:05
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Richard Herring, 13:02
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Toni Lassila, 13:01
- Re: N-integer Levi-Civita, Tim Peters, 12:58
- nonlinear ode with final conditions, vijay, 12:52
- Re: Worst convex region for inscribing a large triangle?, Keith A. Lewis, 12:47
- Re: books on functional analysis, dmitry.sustretov@xxxxxxxxx, 12:39
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Craig Feinstein, 12:34
- Laplace equation within non-coordinate boundaries, Mark, 12:32
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave L. Renfro, 12:30
- fourier series question, Bart Goddard, 12:29
- N-integer Levi-Civita, Ari, 12:13
- Re: Help me with basic homology group, alex kim, 12:04
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:03
- Re: Properties of the sum of two random variables, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:48
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 11:45
- Was ist das "Calculation Management", The Dougster, 11:41
- A probability problem, csl, 11:37
- Re: Testing for run of luck - please explain., bryanjugglercryptographer, 11:32
- Re: ? U*U', Michael Orion, 11:30
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 11:25
- Properties of the sum of two random variables, johannes . bruder, 10:22
- Re: Cauchy-riemann hypothesis superfluous, G.E. Ivey, 10:13
- Re: Cauchy-riemann hypothesis superfluous, fernando revilla, 10:09
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Rotwang, 10:03
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Rotwang, 09:55
- solution of PDE, moloy_kb, 09:51
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, stush, 09:36
- Re: question with 0/0., Tom, 09:27
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Pubkeybreaker, 09:23
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, stush, 09:07
- Any student wanna get free of one subject?, elcaminodelbudainterior, 08:53
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Richard Herring, 08:47
- complete metric space and quotient spaces, jb, 08:42
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, A N Niel, 08:21
- Re: V = L, G. A. Edgar, 08:19
July 25, 2006
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, Logan Shaw, 22:38
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Robert J. Kolker, 22:37
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:58
- Re: How is z^(-r) defined in complex analysis? Are there branching points?, Ted Hwa, 21:52
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Jonathan Hoyle, 21:40
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 21:27
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 21:24
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:18
- Re: How is z^(-r) defined in complex analysis? Are there branching points?, Lee Rudolph, 21:01
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, Jim F., 20:47
- How is z^(-r) defined in complex analysis? Are there branching points?, Michael, 20:47
- Re: calculator, David Moran, 20:35
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:23
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Pierre Asselin, 20:18
- Re: algebra with factor group., mina_world, 20:08
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 20:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 20:05
- Re: Diagonalization for any matrix, andysureway@xxxxxxxxx, 20:03
- Re: Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, fishfry, 19:59
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:57
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 19:56
- Models of the Theory of Categories, largepailsofsand, 19:47
- Skepticism, mysticism, Jewish mathematics, david petry, 19:47
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 19:44
- Hausdorff dimension and balls in R^n, Amanda, 19:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:26
- Re: Diagonalization for any matrix, Gerry Myerson, 19:24
- Re: Ito's formulae for path dependent functions of diffusion process?, Michael, 19:24
- Re: JSH: Iteration over, litsohate, 19:21
- Re: Diagonalization for any matrix, Robert Israel, 19:15
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 19:14
- Re: Boolean algebra & Filters, bargiax, 19:02
- Re: Boolean algebra & Filters, bargiax, 18:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 18:52
- Re: x/x=1*x=x?, Proginoskes, 18:44
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Ken Pledger, 18:42
- Re: Combinatorial design problem (making teams that are sufficiently different), Proginoskes, 18:41
- Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 18:36
- Re: Boolean algebra & Filters, ceckhard, 18:34
- Re: software package for solving pdes, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:32
- Re: what are the alternative estimation methods for small sample of data?, Ray Koopman, 18:24
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 18:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 18:01
- Boolean algebra & Filters, bargiax, 17:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 17:55
- Re: x/x=1*x=x?, jt64, 17:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:32
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Chris Menzel, 17:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 17:13
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:11
- Re: calculator, Bart Goddard, 17:10
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 17:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:08
- Re: mat, mathman, 17:04
- JSH:reposter My Challenge, JSH:repost, 17:01
- An Apparent Symmetry in a Pseudorandom Number Generator, The Dougster, 17:00
- JSH:reposter Life IS Fair, JSH:repost, 16:57
- calculator, afox04, 16:56
- Diagonalization for any matrix, andysureway@xxxxxxxxx, 16:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 16:30
- How to create a model?, iwan2no, 16:25
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 16:15
- Combinatorial design problem (making teams that are sufficiently different), Fons, 16:08
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 16:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 16:00
- Re: Laplacian Distribution Levy Stable?, Robert Israel, 15:49
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 15:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 15:13
- Re: how to deduce a number validation algorithm?, Usher73, 15:08
- Re: what are the alternative estimation methods for small sample of data?, cmgast@xxxxxxxxx, 14:55
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 14:48
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:46
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 14:42
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 14:41
- Re: Laplacian Distribution Levy Stable?, conover, 14:39
- Re: Mod computer problem, Dave Rusin, 14:31
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:30
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:23
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:21
- Re: how to figure out this function: Please help, Felicis@xxxxxxxxx, 14:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 14:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set (definition of m-element/-member/-sequence), Virgil, 14:05
- Re: How many ordinals?, Herman Rubin, 14:02
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 13:57
- Re: An uncountable countable set (definition of m-element/-member/-sequence), Virgil, 13:57
- Re: A "proof" that 1=0 using calculus, Jack, 13:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:53
- Re: Filters and Prime ideals, Herman Rubin, 13:52
- Re: V = L, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:29
- Re: V = L, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:28
- Re: How many ordinals?, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:20
- Re: Plotting equations efficiently, Jennifer, 13:11
- Re: JSH: Iteration over, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:08
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 13:08
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 13:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 12:55
- Re: PHI: Coprime x, y, and z, and their Euler phi values, Robert Israel, 12:54
- Re: Coprime x, y, and z, and their Euler phi values, Tim Peters, 12:54
- Re: Laplacian Distribution Levy Stable?, Herman Rubin, 12:53
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 12:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Michael Stemper, 12:52
- Re: question with 0/0., Michael Stemper, 12:46
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 12:35
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 12:29
- Re: Ito's formulae for path dependent functions of diffusion process?, ArtflDodgr, 12:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 12:20
- Re: Laplacian Distribution Levy Stable?, Robert Israel, 12:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gc, 12:12
- Re: A "proof" that 1=0 using calculus, Jiri Lebl, 12:10
- Re: JSH: My challenge, Wayne Brown, 12:07
- Re: Construction between three linearly independent lines, Keith A. Lewis, 11:59
- Re: algebra with factor group., Arturo Magidin, 11:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 11:24
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Jiri Lebl, 11:13
- Re: algebra with factor group., Lee Rudolph, 11:10
- Re: Is there an online dictionary of constants?, Jens Kruse Andersen, 11:07
- Re: question with 0/0., Randy Poe, 10:56
- algebra with factor group., mina_world, 10:55
- how to figure out this function: Please help, djin_hoy, 10:53
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 10:50
- PHI: Coprime x, y, and z, and their Euler phi values, The Dougster, 10:48
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 10:45
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, Oswald Kluge, 10:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 09:52
- Re: Bounded ratios, TCL, 09:13
- Re: question with 0/0., rajiv . gopinath, 08:41
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tez, 08:37
- Re: Bounded ratios, David C . Ullrich, 08:30
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:26
- Re: JSH: Iteration over, David C . Ullrich, 08:23
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:22
- Re: Bounded ratios, donstockbauer, 08:21
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:19
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set (definition of m-element/-member/-sequence), Franziska Neugebauer, 08:13
- Re: How many ordinals?, Aatu Koskensilta, 08:11
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:08
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:06
- Bounded ratios, TCL, 07:57
- Re: V = L, Aatu Koskensilta, 07:57
- Re: V = L, Aatu Koskensilta, 07:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set (definition of m-element/-member/-sequence), mueckenh, 07:54
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, Steve O'Hara-Smith, 07:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set (definition of m-element/-member/-sequence), Franziska Neugebauer, 07:38
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:24
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:22
- Re: JSH: Iteration over, guenther vonKnakspot, 07:21
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set (definition of m-element/-member/-sequence), mueckenh, 07:14
- Re: A "proof" that 1=0 using calculus, Ulysse from CH, 07:10
- Re: A "proof" that 1=0 using calculus, Ulysse from CH, 07:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:05
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:02
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, Christian Siebert, 06:36
- Re: AM- GM with complex numbers, Paulo Matos, 06:17
- Re: V = L, William Elliot, 06:11
- Re: V = L, William Elliot, 06:09
- Re: JSH: My challenge, Larry Lard, 06:04
- Re: V = L, William Elliot, 06:03
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, The Dougster, 06:02
- Re: How many ordinals?, William Elliot, 06:01
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, The Dougster, 05:53
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, Richard Heathfield, 05:25
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, Logan Shaw, 05:14
- Re: JSH: Iteration over, gjedwards, 04:59
- Re: question with 0/0., Tom, 04:55
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, Christian Siebert, 04:43
- Re: x/x=1*x=x?, Fermat, 04:12
- Re: Range of a function f, Haritha, 03:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 03:34
- Re: Prime ideals of fiber product of R-algebras, Jose Capco, 03:04
- Re: x/x=1*x=x?, jt64, 03:02
- Re: Linear diophantine word problem suggestions, zh.john, 02:48
- Re: Construction between three linearly independent lines, Whatever5k, 02:37
- Re: A new, physics-based approach to analyzing simple games, Proginoskes, 02:18
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, Proginoskes, 02:16
- Re: x/x=1*x=x?, Proginoskes, 02:08
- Laplacian Distribution Levy Stable?, conover, 01:41
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 00:12
- Re: How many ordinals?, Jonathan Hoyle, 00:11
July 24, 2006
- Re: A new, physics-based approach to analyzing simple games, Toni Lassila, 23:56
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, Logan Shaw, 23:34
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, Tim Peters, 23:30
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, Gerry Myerson, 23:25
- Re: x/x=1*x=x?, ravi12346@xxxxxxxxx, 23:20
- Re: Filters and Prime ideals, William Elliot, 22:45
- Rational function, Deep, 22:41
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, Jens Kruse Andersen, 22:39
- Re: AM- GM with complex numbers, Catarina Dias, 22:38
- JSH: Gloves are off again now, jstevh@xxxxxxxx, 22:32
- Re: Iteration over, Mr Cheese, 22:21
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 22:05
- Re: JSH: Iteration over, jshsucks, 22:03
- Re: Cohomology ring computation question, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez, 22:02
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 22:00
- Re: question with 0/0., jt64, 21:38
- Re: x/x=1*x=x?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:37
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 21:35
- Re: Cohomology ring computation question, James, 21:32
- Re: AM- GM with complex numbers, Paulo Matos, 21:18
- Re: AM- GM with complex numbers, Paulo Matos, 21:16
- Re: inverse a matrix, Robert Israel, 21:04
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 20:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:51
- Re: Primes in a table, Bill Dubuque, 20:49
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 20:32
- Re: Cohomology ring computation question, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez, 20:32
- JSH: Iteration over, jstevh, 20:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:08
- Re: V = L, Rupert, 19:59
- Re: An uncountable countable set, David R Tribble, 19:58
- Re: V = L, Rupert, 19:57
- Re: V = L, martin cohen, 19:56
- Re: JSH: Life IS fair, litsohate, 19:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 19:54
- Re: IGNORANCE IS SATAN'S RELIGION: HELL, ISN'T IT? FBI EXPOSED IN SATANIC FORUM COVER-UP OPERATION!!, ef_hutterite, 19:48
- Re: V = L, Jonathan Hoyle, 19:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, David R Tribble, 19:47
- Plotting equations efficiently, xyz91234, 19:35
- inverse a matrix, John McKormick, 19:26
- Re: question with 0/0., jt64, 19:21
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:19
- Re: V = L, Gerry Myerson, 19:18
- Re: derivation of velocity formula for tense string, Jeremy Boden, 19:08
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:03
- Re: IGNORANCE IS SATAN'S RELIGION: HELL, ISN'T IT? FBI EXPOSED IN SATANIC FORUM COVER-UP OPERATION!!, Gunner, 18:56
- Re: JSH: My challenge, Tim Peters, 18:54
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 18:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 18:50
- Re: JSH: SF: Explicit solution, Tim Peters, 18:43
- Re: question with 0/0., jt64, 18:41
- Re: JSH: Life IS fair, Proginoskes, 18:41
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 18:39
- Re: JSH: My challenge, Proginoskes, 18:35
- Re: Prime ideals of fiber product of R-algebras, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez, 18:35
- derivation of velocity formula for tense string, Wendy E. McCaughrin, 18:30
- Re: Network (graph) construction problem, Proginoskes, 18:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 18:25
- Re: x/x=1*x=x?, Proginoskes, 18:24
- Re: Testing for run of luck - please explain., dwickford, 18:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 18:15
- Re: question with 0/0., jt64, 18:15
- Re: question with 0/0., Dik T. Winter, 18:11
- Re: Prove the difference between 2 sets, Proginoskes, 18:09
- Re: Prove difference between 2 sets, Proginoskes, 18:07
- Re: Is there an online dictionary of constants?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:06
- Re: Is there an online dictionary of constants?, Badger, 18:06
- Re: Is there an online dictionary of constants?, amzoti, 18:05
- Re: Is there an online dictionary of constants?, amzoti, 18:02
- Re: Mod computer problem, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:57
- Re: Self reference, David R Tribble, 17:54
- Re: How many ordinals?, Aatu Koskensilta, 17:53
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 17:45
- Re: Self reference, T.H. Ray, 17:43
- Re: How many ordinals?, David R Tribble, 17:42
- Is there an online dictionary of constants?, TCL, 17:41
- Filters and Prime ideals, Jose Capco, 17:31
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, Proginoskes, 17:30
- Re: My world, Proginoskes, 17:28
- Prime ideals of fiber product of R-algebras, Jose Capco, 17:27
- Cohomology ring computation question, James, 17:24
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 17:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set (definition of m-element/-member/-sequence), Franziska Neugebauer, 17:16
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 17:03
- Re: Range of a function f, Robert Israel, 17:01
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, pegguru, 16:56
- Re: Primes in a table, Robert Israel, 16:56
- Re: A Geometry Question, magdon@xxxxxxxxx, 16:48
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:48
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:44
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:40
- Re: Mod computer problem, Dave Rusin, 16:38
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:31
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:24
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:18
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:17
- Re: Did I Do This Right, John Schutkeker, 16:12
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 16:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Randy Poe, 16:06
- Re: Simple question about convex function, Robert Israel, 16:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:03
- Re: Construction between three linearly independent lines, Dave Rusin, 16:03
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:00
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:58
- Re: Did I Do This Right, Robert Israel, 15:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:54
- Range of a function f, Haritha, 15:50
- Re: number after 9, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:45
- Re: IGNORANCE IS SATAN'S RELIGION: HELL, ISN'T IT? FBI EXPOSED IN SATANIC FORUM COVER-UP OPERATION!!, Eldridge Currie, 15:44
- Primes in a table, ravi12346@xxxxxxxxx, 15:40
- Re: JSH: Life IS fair, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:40
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 15:38
- A Geometry Question, magdon@xxxxxxxxx, 15:33
- Re: number after 9, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:28
- Re: How many ordinals?, Aatu Koskensilta, 15:25
- Simple question about convex function, alex kim, 15:25
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 15:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:21
- Re: Newton discoveing calculus, Herman Rubin, 15:18
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:11
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:09
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:53
- Re: An uncountable countable set (definition of m-element/-member/-sequence), Virgil, 14:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:50
- Re: Construction between three linearly independent lines, Randy Poe, 14:44
- Re: Construction between three linearly independent lines, Randy Poe, 14:44
- Re: Did I Do This Right, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:40
- Re: JSH: Life IS fair, marcus_b, 14:32
- Re: submodule question, Arturo Magidin, 14:12
- Re: submodule question, Bill Dubuque, 14:02
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 14:01
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:54
- Re: JSH: SF: Explicit solution, Mr Cheese, 13:52
- Re: Research in mathematics, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:50
- Re: submodule question, W. Dale Hall, 13:49
- Re: SF: Explicit solution, Michael Stemper, 13:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set (definition of m-element/-member/-sequence), mueckenh, 13:33
- Re: submodule question, Bill Dubuque, 13:33
- Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?, Robert Israel, 13:28
- Did I Do This Right, John Schutkeker, 13:25
- Re: Construction between three linearly independent lines, christian_mohr_home, 13:25
- Re: V = L, Aatu Koskensilta, 13:24
- Re: submodule question, Arturo Magidin, 13:12
- Re: submodule question, W. Dale Hall, 13:00
- Re: Construction between three linearly independent lines, Boris Novikov, 12:57
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, Tom St Denis, 12:52
- mat, Ivan, 12:52
- Re: V = L, Gene Ward Smith, 12:51
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 12:51
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, Oswald Kluge, 12:49
- Re: submodule question, Boris Novikov, 12:49
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, wkehowski@xxxxxxx, 12:49
- Re: What is the current state of Math?, Bill Dubuque, 12:41
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 12:37
- Re: Category of rationals, Marc Olschok, 12:36
- Re: question with 0/0., Randy Poe, 12:35
- Re: module annihilator question, Boris Novikov, 12:31
- Re: question with 0/0., David R Tribble, 12:30
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Randy Poe, 12:29
- Re: complex analysis with ...., José Carlos Santos, 12:29
- Re: complex analysis with ...., alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 12:26
- Re: module annihilator question, Arturo Magidin, 12:23
- Re: submodule question, Arturo Magidin, 12:18
- Re: submodule question, Boris Novikov, 12:15
- module annihilator question, nullgraph, 12:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 12:11
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, bachelor, 12:10
- Re: complex analysis with ...., Robert Israel, 12:03
- Re: complex analysis with ...., mina_world, 11:57
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, Christian Siebert, 11:45
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, pegguru, 11:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Jiri Lebl, 11:39
- Re: complex analysis with ...., José Carlos Santos, 11:34
- Component mode synthesis... Stability of vectorial subspaces, Alain Batailly, 11:31
- Re: submodule question, José Carlos Santos, 11:30
- Re: Research in mathematics, A N Niel, 11:22
- Re: question with 0/0., Tom, 11:19
- submodule question, nullgraph, 11:18
- complex analysis with ...., mina_world, 11:17
- Re: question with 0/0., fernando revilla, 11:15
- Re: V = L, Dave L. Renfro, 11:11
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:01
- Re: Construction between three linearly independent lines, Randy Poe, 11:00
- Re: Construction between three linearly independent lines, Keith A. Lewis, 10:53
- Re: Efficient sieving implementation?, Tom St Denis, 10:53
- Re: A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question, azfarqureshi, 10:47
- Efficient sieving implementation?, Oswald Kluge, 10:41
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, Keith A. Lewis, 10:41
- Gradient of an Unknown function, Mubashir, 10:32
- Gradient of an unknown function, Mubashir, 10:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 10:28
- Re: An uncountable countable set (definition of m-element/-member/-sequence), Franziska Neugebauer, 10:24
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 10:21
- Re: Construction between three linearly independent lines, Whatever5k, 10:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:14
- V = L, William Elliot, 10:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:09
- Re: Construction between three linearly independent lines, David C . Ullrich, 10:08
- Re: question with 0/0., Tom, 10:03
- Re: JSH: Life IS fair, David C . Ullrich, 10:02
- Re: JSH: My challenge, David C . Ullrich, 10:00
- Re: question with 0/0., jt64, 09:51
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 09:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set (definition of m-element/-member/-sequence), mueckenh, 09:41
- Re: question with 0/0., Dik T. Winter, 09:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:33
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 09:32
- Research in mathematics, aone1504, 09:17
- Re: question with 0/0., jt64, 09:02
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 08:05
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 07:54
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 07:53
- Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?, John Bailey, 07:28
- Re: JSH: SF: Explicit solution, Honey-Bunny 'n Pumpkin, 07:19
- Re: question with 0/0., Tom, 07:18
- Construction between three linearly independent lines, christian_mohr_home, 06:51
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 05:35
- Re: Number Series, aamoy, 05:19
- Network (graph) construction problem, Matthias Knelangen, 05:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:44
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:25
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:24
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:21
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:17
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:16
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:13
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:10
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:08
- Re: computation in the algebraic closure of 3-adic field Q_3, Gene Ward Smith, 04:06
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 04:05
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, R. Srinivasan, 04:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 03:58
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 03:53
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, ben, 03:52
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 03:51
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, ben, 03:48
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, The Dougster, 03:36
- computation in the algebraic closure of 3-adic field Q_3, lataianu bogdan, 03:27
- Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?, Rod, 03:22
- Re: A question about L^2 norm, Ronald Bruck, 03:21
- Re: question with 0/0., jt64, 02:50
- Re: Ito's formulae for path dependent functions of diffusion process?, Jannick Asmus, 02:48
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 02:44
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 02:41
- Re: A "proof" that 1=0 using calculus, Rupert, 02:39
- Re: This one should be easy., Rupert, 02:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 02:22
- Re: This one should be easy., William Elliot, 02:21
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 02:19
- Re: JSH: SF: Explicit solution, Tim Peters, 02:16
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 02:13
- Re: Newton discoveing calculus, dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 02:11
- This one should be easy., Mr Cheese, 02:06
July 23, 2006
- Re: SF: Explicit solution, Bertie Reed, 10:28
- Re: x/x=1*x=x?, Spamless, 10:02
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Robert J. Kolker, 09:01
- Re: x/x=1*x=x?, G.E. Ivey, 09:00
- AM- GM with complex numbers, Catarina Dias, 08:28
- Re: x/x=1*x=x?, guenther vonKnakspot, 08:24
- Re: Mod computer problem, Pubkeybreaker, 08:17
- Re: x/x=1*x=x?, Gene Ward Smith, 08:13
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 07:59
- Martin Gardner's "New Mathematical Diversions", zerotype, 07:57
- It's difficoult, Edena, 07:44
- x/x=1*x=x?, Dennis B, 07:37
- Re: question with 0/0., jt64, 07:08
- Re: question with 0/0., jt64, 07:08
- Re: The sum of "most" pairs of normal r.v.'s is not normally distrbuted., illywhacker, 06:57
- Re: question with 0/0., kunzmilan, 06:47
- Re: Self reference, T.H. Ray, 06:31
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, wkehowski@xxxxxxx, 05:20
- Re: span of matrices, karlfredrickson, 05:15
- An old 'refutation' of Langevin's twin paradox, Ulysse from CH, 05:03
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, Phil Carmody, 04:59
- Re: Testing for run of luck, dwickford, 04:35
- Re: Using all digits..., kunzmilan, 04:16
- Re: How many ordinals?, William Elliot, 04:13
- A "proof" that 1=0 using calculus, Ulysse from CH, 03:44
- Re: A question about L^2 norm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 03:17
- Re: The 7 Math Deadly Sins, Mike, 03:08
- Re: The 7 Math Deadly Sins, Vladimir Bondarenko, 02:57
- Re: convexity, Robert Israel, 02:57
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, kunzmilan, 02:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 02:53
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 02:44
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, Gene Ward Smith, 02:43
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, Robert Israel, 02:41
- Re: A question about L^2 norm, Jannick Asmus, 02:31
- Re: A question about L^2 norm, Jannick Asmus, 02:25
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 02:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 02:06
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, wkehowski@xxxxxxx, 01:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 01:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 01:25
- Re: Gloves are off now, Luc The Perverse, 00:26
- Re: Testing for run of luck, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:17
- Re: Gloves are off now, Mr Cheese, 00:16
July 22, 2006
- Re: A question about L^2 norm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:52
- Re: Testing for run of luck, W. Dale Hall, 23:48
- Re: An error in Kolmogorov Fomin's book?, TCL, 23:30
- Testing for run of luck, dwickford, 23:11
- Re: A question about L^2 norm, Ronald Bruck, 23:08
- Re: A question about L^2 norm, Ronald Bruck, 23:00
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 22:58
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 22:46
- Re: maths for programming C++, Robbie Hatley, 22:43
- Re: number after 9, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 22:42
- Re: Do The Math: Save Gas By Driving Slower, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 22:41
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 22:34
- Re: a subset of natural number, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 22:31
- Re: maths for programming C++, Robbie Hatley, 22:19
- Re: maths for programming C++, Robbie Hatley, 22:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 22:14
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David Bernier, 22:05
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 22:03
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 21:59
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:55
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:40
- Re: How many ordinals?, Chip Eastham, 21:36
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:19
- Re: The White Box, Robbie Hatley, 21:17
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:13
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:11
- Re: An error in Kolmogorov Fomin's book?, A N Niel, 21:01
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Patricia Shanahan, 20:06
- Re: u guys are boring, explorer, 19:37
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 19:26
- Re: Mod computer problem, William Elliot, 19:06
- Re: Mod computer problem, Phil Carmody, 18:57
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:57
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:46
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, Phil Carmody, 18:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:36
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:22
- Re: u guys are boring, The Grand Beckoning, 18:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:17
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Keith Ramsay, 18:14
- An error in Kolmogorov Fomin's book?, TCL, 18:08
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Robert J. Kolker, 17:23
- Re: A question about L^2 norm, TCL, 17:12
- Re: The extended version of Euler's theorem?, Tim Peters, 17:10
- Re: Klein Bottle, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 17:03
- Re: Klein Bottle, W. Dale Hall, 16:49
- Re: convexity, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:49
- Re: convexity, standshik, 16:43
- Re: convexity, standshik, 16:41
- convexity, standshik, 16:37
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:18
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Nathan, 16:11
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 15:57
- u guys are boring, nzwbzdlwmtkjjl, 15:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:46
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 15:44
- Re: 3-dim transformation- procrustes problem, JEMebius, 15:43
- Why would this value be right in the middle of a random series?, The Dougster, 15:39
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:36
- Re: 3-dim transformation, OZ, 15:31
- The sum of "most" pairs of normal r.v.'s is not normally distrbuted., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 15:24
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 15:21
- Re: Category of rationals, lucasmetal2, 15:21
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:17
- Re: Category of rationals, Rainer Rosenthal, 15:16
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 15:07
- Re: number after 9, Rainer Rosenthal, 15:06
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 15:02
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:00
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 14:59
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:59
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 14:59
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 14:53
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 14:45
- Re: 3-dim transformation, Michael Orion, 14:21
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, The Dougster, 14:20
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, The Dougster, 14:14
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 14:07
- 3-dim transformation, OZ, 13:55
- Re: A question about L^2 norm, Ronald Bruck, 13:30
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, N. Silver, 13:25
- Re: " A functional equation :f(x) =f(2x +1) + f(4x) + f(4x +1) , x > 0 ", Patrick Coilland, 13:23
- Re: Category of rationals, Marc Olschok, 13:20
- Re: Mod computer problem, Bill Dubuque, 13:10
- Re: How many ordinals?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:08
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, A N Niel, 13:01
- Re: Sum of radical ideals, Jose Capco, 12:49
- Re: A method to find a local minima, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:46
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:40
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Patricia Shanahan, 12:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:24
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:21
- Re: The extended version of Euler's theorem?, Michael Orion, 12:20
- " A functional equation :f(x) =f(2x +1) + f(4x) + f(4x +1) , x > 0 ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 12:15
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:07
- Re: Finding pressure?, Wim Benthem, 12:06
- Re: A question about L^2 norm, Jannick Asmus, 12:02
- Re: The extended version of Euler's theorem?, Gottfried Helms, 11:31
- Meaning of "the extensions of", h2g, 11:25
- Re: The extended version of Euler's theorem?, Gottfried Helms, 11:12
- Re: A method to find a local minima, Frequencier, 11:07
- Re: Prove the difference between 2 sets, Frequencier, 11:01
- RE: Prove the difference between 2 sets, Frequencier, 10:59
- Re: A method to find a local minima, mathlover, 10:45
- A question about L^2 norm, TCL, 10:38
- Re: Newton discoveing calculus, Badger, 10:29
- Re: Newbie P-NP Question, Pubkeybreaker, 10:03
- Re: The extended version of Euler's theorem?, bert, 09:58
- Re: The extended version of Euler's theorem?, Pubkeybreaker, 09:55
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 09:52
- The extended version of Euler's theorem?, muyu, 09:46
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, N. Silver, 09:20
- Re: A method to find a local minima, Badger, 09:19
- Re: How many ordinals?, William Elliot, 08:18
- Re: solution to Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates, 1940LaSalle, 07:48
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, johnjo, 07:43
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, wkehowski@xxxxxxx, 07:41
- Re: Mod computer problem, David Moran, 07:38
- Re: How many ordinals?, William Elliot, 07:31
- Re: A method to find a local minima, www.bodywerx.co.uk, 06:50
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, David C . Ullrich, 06:48
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 06:30
- A method to find a local minima, mathlover, 06:29
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, ben, 05:53
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:23
- Limited divisibility of S = x^n +y^n +c^n by n, Roman B. Binder, 05:11
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, wkehowski@xxxxxxx, 05:08
- Re: One-parameter groups, Julien Santini, 04:59
- Re: Mod computer problem, William Elliot, 04:55
- Re: Mod computer problem, William Elliot, 04:50
- Re: How many ordinals?, William Elliot, 04:45
- Re: How many ordinals?, William Elliot, 04:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 04:24
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 04:18
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 04:08
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 04:02
- Q concerning Euler-summation, Gottfried Helms, 03:58
- Ito's formulae for path dependent functions of diffusion process?, Michael, 03:52
- a^5+b^5+c^5+d^5+e^5 = f^5, titus_piezas, 03:50
- Prove difference between 2 sets, Tyrannosaurus Reks, 03:24
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Bill Dubuque, 03:17
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, Gottfried Helms, 03:15
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 03:09
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 03:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, herbzet, 03:03
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 03:03
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, Gottfried Helms, 02:58
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, Gottfried Helms, 02:10
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 01:21
- Re: Linear algebra txtbk recommendations..., John Schutkeker, 01:20
- Newbie P-NP Question, John Schutkeker, 01:17
- Re: inverting a cubic polynomial as a series, John Schutkeker, 01:12
- Re: JSH: Truth is the highest ideal, David Bernier, 00:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 00:07
July 21, 2006
- Re: JSH: Truth is the highest ideal, Gib Bogle, 23:54
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Robert J. Kolker, 23:35
- Re: origin-fixing isometry, Ronald Bruck, 23:09
- Re: Question about exponention, William Elliot, 22:57
- Re: Finding pressure?, 1940LaSalle, 22:17
- Re: Finding pressure?, 1940LaSalle, 22:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 22:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 22:06
- Re: number after 9, zxcv_890, 21:56
- Re: number after 9, zxcv_890, 21:53
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:49
- Re: number after 9, zxcv_890, 21:49
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:43
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, Gene Ward Smith, 21:32
- Re: how to deduce a number validation algorithm?, Usher73, 21:27
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, The Dougster, 21:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 21:03
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:59
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 20:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 20:54
- Re: how to deduce a number validation algorithm?, Usher73, 20:52
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 20:48
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, guenther vonKnakspot, 20:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 20:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:31
- Re: How many ordinals?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 20:18
- Re: Recognizing Straight Lines, Dik T. Winter, 20:16
- Re: Mod computer problem, David Moran, 20:15
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 20:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Jiri Lebl, 19:59
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 19:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 19:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 19:17
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 19:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 19:11
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, W. Dale Hall, 19:11
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 19:09
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 19:08
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 18:55
- Re: How many ordinals?, W. Dale Hall, 18:40
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, W. Dale Hall, 18:35
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:33
- Re: number after 9, Richard Tobin, 18:23
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:23
- Re: We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, martin cohen, 17:59
- Re: Category of rationals, Rainer Rosenthal, 17:40
- Re: Mod computer problem, david bandel, 17:37
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, bill, 17:27
- Re: The 7 Math Deadly Sins, jhnrmsdn, 16:59
- Re: Finding pressure?, tekhneek, 16:54
- Re: Category of rationals, G. A. Edgar, 16:54
- Re: Finding pressure?, Robert Israel, 16:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:22
- Re: Category of rationals, Jamie, 16:21
- We have a winner for FLTMA Prize #1, The Dougster, 16:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:14
- Re: FLMTA Prize #1: S(n)=0 & n>(phi(x)*phi(y)*phi(z)/8) --> ten bucks, The Dougster, 16:11
- Re: Category of rationals, Hero, 16:08
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, Michael Orion, 16:05
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, , 16:01
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:48
- Re: number after 9, Rainer Rosenthal, 15:40
- Star Gate 1, Jack Sarfatti, 15:39
- Re: Category of rationals, Rainer Rosenthal, 15:25
- Re: Klein Bottle, James, 15:17
- Re: number after 9, A N Niel, 15:12
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:09
- solution to Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates, 1940LaSalle, 15:02
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Arturo Magidin, 15:02
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, David R Tribble, 14:59
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:55
- Re: How many ordinals?, W. Dale Hall, 14:53
- Re: Recognizing Straight Lines, martin cohen, 14:53
- Re: The 7 Math Deadly Sins, Igor, 14:48
- THANKS to all Alicia Marroquin, Alicia, 14:48
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, Arturo Magidin, 14:46
- Re: I know how it this equation was rearranged THANKS, Alicia, 14:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:44
- Re: number after 9, zxcv_890, 14:43
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, W. Dale Hall, 14:39
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:37
- Finding pressure?, tekhneek, 14:34
- Re: The 7 Math Deadly Sins, Vladimir Bondarenko, 14:33
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, don, 14:31
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Felicis@xxxxxxxxx, 14:31
- Re: Self reference, Dave Seaman, 14:30
- Re: Klein Bottle, W. Dale Hall, 14:27
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:24
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Bill Dubuque, 14:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set (definition of m-element/-member/-sequence), Franziska Neugebauer, 14:13
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:12
- Re: Gloves are off now, Phil Bostock, 14:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:08
- Re: Max likelihood of complicated function, prada_white, 14:03
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:58
- Re: Gloves are off now, W. D. Allen, 13:56
- Re: Adding 2 sets of roll/pitch/yaw-, JEMebius, 13:48
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:48
- Re: Self reference, stush, 13:41
- Re: number after 9, A N Niel, 13:41
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, Pubkeybreaker, 13:41
- Re: Self reference, polymedes, 13:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:32
- Re: Max likelihood of complicated function, Herman Rubin, 13:27
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:25
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, guenther vonKnakspot, 13:25
- Re: Divine apparitions in the tethered goat problem?, Robert Israel, 13:16
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, bert, 13:14
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, Pubkeybreaker, 13:11
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, Pubkeybreaker, 13:08
- Re: FLMTA Prize #1: S(n)=0 & n>(phi(x)*phi(y)*phi(z)/8) --> ten bucks, Robert Israel, 13:02
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, Pubkeybreaker, 13:01
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, Michael Orion, 12:58
- Re: Newton discoveing calculus, Herman Rubin, 12:57
- Re: Category of rationals, Marc Olschok, 12:53
- pseudo-permutations of elements in disjoint sets, h3nry, 12:51
- Re: Number theory - Powers of 2, guenther vonKnakspot, 12:51
- Re: Question about exponention, Jens Kruse Andersen, 12:50
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Herman Rubin, 12:45
- Re: My world, José Carlos Santos, 12:37
- Re: number after 9, Michael Orion, 12:33
- Number theory - Powers of 2, Eddy, 12:31
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:28
- Re: One-parameter groups, Robert Israel, 12:23
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 12:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:17
- Re: how to deduce a number validation algorithm?, Tim_Mac, 12:17
- Re: how to deduce a number validation algorithm?, stush, 12:15
- Re: How many ordinals?, Chip Eastham, 12:02
- Re: Question about exponention, Marc Olschok, 11:59
- Re: Mod computer problem, Jussi Piitulainen, 11:59
- Re: how to deduce a number validation algorithm?, Jeremy Boden, 11:35
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 11:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george, 11:22
- Re: Mod computer problem, Jussi Piitulainen, 11:18
- Max likelihood of complicated function, prada_white, 11:17
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Nathan, 11:17
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tez, 10:58
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Ulysse from CH, 10:53
- Re: Sum of radical ideals, Ulysse from CH, 10:53
- Re: How many ordinals?, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:50
- Re: How many ordinals?, Richard Tobin, 10:48
- Re: number after 9, stush, 10:47
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 10:46
- number after 9, zxcv_890, 10:40
- Re: Sum of radical ideals, Jannick Asmus, 10:38
- Re: How many ordinals?, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:30
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 10:27
- Category of rationals, Jamie, 10:27
- Re: Mod computer problem, Pubkeybreaker, 10:25
- Re: Mod computer problem, Pubkeybreaker, 10:20
- Re: Mod computer problem, Bill Dubuque, 10:10
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 09:45
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Lady Musketeer, 09:44
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, Derek Holt, 09:26
- Re: Mod computer problem, William Elliot, 09:15
- Re: Mod computer problem, Jussi Piitulainen, 08:53
- Re: How many ordinals?, William Elliot, 08:53
- Re: How many ordinals?, William Elliot, 08:52
- Re: How many ordinals?, William Elliot, 08:51
- Re: The 7 Math Deadly Sins, mathsboy, 08:49
- Re: origin-fixing isometry, Ulysse from CH, 08:44
- Re: Responding to Brad Guth - ENOUGH!, Brian Lunergan, 08:36
- Re: Divine apparitions in the tethered goat problem?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 08:22
- Re: Mod computer problem, Pubkeybreaker, 08:22
- Klein Bottle, James, 08:18
- Mod computer problem, William Elliot, 08:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:02
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 07:53
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 07:33
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Dave Seaman, 07:29
- Probabilistic Combinatorics Notes Help, Sundus, 07:27
- Re: how to deduce a number validation algorithm?, stush, 07:02
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:55
- Re: Sum of radical ideals, David C . Ullrich, 06:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:47
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), matt271829-news, 06:45
- Re: a subset of natural number, David C . Ullrich, 06:44
- how to deduce a number validation algorithm?, Tim_Mac, 06:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:39
- Re: Adding 2 sets of roll/pitch/yaw, matt271829-news, 06:39
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:34
- Re: Sum of radical ideals, Jose Capco, 06:18
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 06:14
- The Mathematics Of A Lampshade, studiescircle, 06:12
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Mike Kelly, 06:10
- Sum of radical ideals, Jose Capco, 06:08
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 05:38
- Re: Generating function for Mathieu functions, Paul Abbott, 05:09
- Re: Question about exponention, William Elliot, 05:06
- ? break one integral into parts, Cheng Cosine, 04:54
- Generating function for Mathieu functions, cosmicstring, 04:39
- Re: Question about exponention, WingDragon, 04:25
- Question about exponention, WingDragon, 04:13
- Infinitesimal generator of a vector field, Julien Santini, 04:01
- Re: FLMTA Prize #1: S(n)=0 & n>(phi(x)*phi(y)*phi(z)/8) --> ten bucks, The Dougster, 04:01
- Re: My world, Bertie Reed, 03:53
- One-parameter groups, Julien Santini, 03:52
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), Paul Abbott, 03:50
- Re: Recognizing Straight Lines, Han de Bruijn, 03:20
- Re: a | c & b | c --> lcm(a,b) | c, right?, The Dougster, 03:14
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), James Dow Allen, 03:08
- Re: Probabilistic combinatorics help, Gerry Myerson, 02:23
- a subset of natural number, levine121323, 02:17
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 02:05
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 01:51
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 01:49
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Bill Taylor, 01:40
- Re: Newton discoveing calculus, dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 01:24
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), Paul Abbott, 01:00
- Probabilistic combinatorics help, Sundus, 00:59
- Re: Newton discoveing calculus, fishfry, 00:49
July 20, 2006
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David Bernier, 23:53
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:42
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:37
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:33
- Re: JSH: My world, Robert Israel, 23:30
- A series related to the Hilbert transform, Larry Hammick, 23:28
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 22:59
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, msustik, 22:52
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, lBrix man, 22:33
- Re: Newton discoveing calculus, Gene Ward Smith, 22:32
- Newton discoveing calculus, Dan in Philly, 22:25
- Re: The 7 Math Deadly Sins, lBrix man, 22:13
- Re: P vs NP vs infinity, Wendy E. McCaughrin, 22:08
- Re: The 7 Math Deadly Sins, fishfry, 21:44
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 21:33
- Re: Do The Math: Save Gas By Driving Slower, ytyourclothes, 21:25
- The 7 Math Deadly Sins, Vladimir Bondarenko, 21:01
- Re: FLMTA Prize #1: S(n)=0 & n>(phi(x)*phi(y)*phi(z)/8) --> ten bucks, The Dougster, 21:00
- Re: Help with weird integral?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 20:54
- Re: a | c & b | c --> lcm(a,b) | c, right?, Robert Israel, 20:29
- Re: Entire functions, polynomial bounds, david petry, 20:26
- Re: FLMTA Prize #1: S(n)=0 & n>(phi(x)*phi(y)*phi(z)/8) --> ten bucks, The Dougster, 20:22
- Re: Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, atkrunner, 20:12
- Re: Entire functions, polynomial bounds, David C . Ullrich, 20:07
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, ytyourclothes, 19:56
- From me to you, dorcheg, 19:55
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, David C . Ullrich, 19:55
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, jt64, 19:54
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, David C . Ullrich, 19:53
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Robert Israel, 19:52
- a | c & b | c --> lcm(a,b) | c, right?, The Dougster, 19:47
- wonderful!, Mark, 19:41
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 19:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 19:21
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 19:19
- Re: Crackpot factoring scheme?, Gerry Myerson, 19:14
- Re: Divine apparitions in the tethered goat problem?, Virgil, 19:12
- Entire functions, polynomial bounds, david petry, 19:09
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 19:05
- Re: JSH: Truth is the highest ideal, James Horace, 18:59
- Crackpot factoring scheme?, Dann Corbit, 18:56
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 18:52
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, moriman, 18:49
- We are in the Wall Street Journal now!, CoreyWhite@xxxxxxxxx, 18:48
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:41
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:34
- We are in the wall street journal now!, CoreyWhite@xxxxxxxxx, 18:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:31
- Re: Exponential Growth/Decay, Agent Smith, 18:31
- Re: JSH: My world, jt64, 18:29
- Re: JSH: My world, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 18:12
- Re: JSH: My world, jt64, 18:09
- Re: FLMTA Prize #1: S(n)=0 & n>(phi(x)*phi(y)*phi(z)/8) --> ten bucks, The Dougster, 18:03
- Re: JSH: My world, lBrix man, 18:00
- Re: FLMTA Prize #1: S(n)=0 & n>(phi(x)*phi(y)*phi(z)/8) --> ten bucks, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:57
- Re: JSH: My world, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:55
- Re: JSH: My world, The Dougster, 17:50
- Re: Divine apparitions in the tethered goat problem?, jt64, 17:49
- FLMTA Prize #1: S(n)=0 & n>(phi(x)*phi(y)*phi(z)/8) --> ten bucks, The Dougster, 17:46
- Re: JSH: My world, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:45
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, msustik, 17:44
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), matt271829-news, 17:34
- Adding 2 sets of roll/pitch/yaw, Dan, 17:33
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Bill Dubuque, 17:32
- Re: Truth is the highest ideal, lBrix man, 17:16
- Re: Divine apparitions in the tethered goat problem?, Robert Israel, 17:16
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Bill Dubuque, 17:08
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, Phil Carmody, 17:07
- Re: Divine apparitions in the tethered goat problem?, jt64, 17:06
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, David Moran, 16:59
- Re: Divine apparitions in the tethered goat problem?, jt64, 16:57
- Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon, exluding a disc, Ray Koopman, 16:53
- Re: I need to know how it this equation was rearranged, jpalmour, 16:48
- Re: Help with weird integral?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 16:43
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, C W, 16:43
- Re: I need to know how it this equation was rearranged, stush, 16:40
- Re: I need to know how it this equation was rearranged, Dann Corbit, 16:39
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 16:38
- I need to know how it this equation was rearranged, Alicia, 16:31
- Divine apparitions in the tethered goat problem?, jpalmour, 16:26
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, Robert Israel, 16:25
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), Richard Harter, 16:17
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Lee Rudolph, 16:16
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, W. Dale Hall, 16:08
- Re: JSH: My world, gjedwards, 16:04
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Dann Corbit, 16:04
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Patricia Shanahan, 16:01
- Conservation of Info. and Generation of Info. give "Systems", Zim Olson, 15:53
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, W. Dale Hall, 15:51
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:50
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 15:46
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, Arturo Magidin, 15:46
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 15:46
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, W. Dale Hall, 15:45
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Pubkeybreaker, 15:44
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, W. Dale Hall, 15:41
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, Wayne Brown, 15:40
- Re: Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:39
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Virgil, 15:33
- Re: Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:31
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:29
- Re: Another look at triangle number factoring., Dan, 15:29
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:28
- Re: A property of the parabolas, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 15:27
- Re: My world, David Moran, 15:25
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 15:20
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, Arturo Magidin, 15:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 15:12
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, jt64, 15:11
- Re: Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, atkrunner, 15:11
- Re: Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, Ronald Bruck, 15:10
- Re: local rings, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 15:08
- I see this, dorcheg, 15:06
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, guenther vonKnakspot, 15:05
- Possible to Find the Clusters One by One??, mathlover, 15:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 15:02
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, guenther vonKnakspot, 15:01
- Re: Finite fields and Splitting fields, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 14:57
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 14:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 14:51
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, C W, 14:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 14:49
- local rings, jamesdickerson00, 14:46
- Re: Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:46
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, Mark Spahn, 14:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 14:40
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 14:37
- Finite fields and Splitting fields, vedmundson, 14:35
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Dann Corbit, 14:33
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Patricia Shanahan, 14:29
- Re: Free sites for you, donstockbauer, 14:16
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Pubkeybreaker, 14:12
- Re: How many ordinals?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:06
- Re: "useful" math, Herman Rubin, 14:03
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, C W, 13:59
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, Herman Rubin, 13:58
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, Herman Rubin, 13:51
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Dave Seaman, 13:51
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Dann Corbit, 13:49
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, moriman, 13:48
- Re: Expectation value in terms of cumulative distribution, Randy Poe, 13:46
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Jeremy Boden, 13:43
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, G man, 13:42
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, Herman Rubin, 13:41
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 13:39
- Re: Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, atkrunner, 13:36
- Re: Recognizing Straight Lines, Jennifer, 13:26
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Herman Rubin, 13:25
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 13:24
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, Herman Rubin, 13:19
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, Jennifer, 13:17
- Re: JSH: Truth is the highest ideal, amzoti, 13:16
- Re: Truth is the highest ideal, G man, 13:15
- Re: JSH: Truth is the highest ideal, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:13
- Re: My world, G man, 13:05
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, Robert Israel, 13:04
- Re: Expectation value in terms of cumulative distribution, Herman Rubin, 13:03
- Re: Expectation value in terms of cumulative distribution, ArtflDodgr, 13:01
- Free sites for you, dorcheg, 12:59
- Re: Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:54
- Re: Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, upendra0111, 12:48
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:46
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Pubkeybreaker, 12:41
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:36
- Re: Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:15
- Re: JSH: Truth is the highest ideal, Arturo Magidin, 12:13
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, Arturo Magidin, 12:10
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 11:53
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Dave L. Renfro, 11:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 11:48
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Dave L. Renfro, 11:39
- Re: JSH: Truth is the highest ideal, amzoti, 11:34
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Robert Israel, 11:34
- Re: A property of the parabolas, José Carlos Santos, 11:31
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 11:31
- Re: My world, José Carlos Santos, 11:29
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 11:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 11:25
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Lee Rudolph, 11:23
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 11:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 11:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lee Rudolph, 11:18
- Help with weird integral?, Sarah B., 11:15
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Chris Smith, 11:12
- Re: possible to use Generalized Method of Moments for this problem?, Herman Rubin, 10:58
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, jamesbev, 10:49
- Re: How many ordinals?, Chip Eastham, 10:42
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Chris Smith, 10:31
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tez, 10:27
- Re: How many ordinals?, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:26
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, MTD, 10:18
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, MTD, 10:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:08
- Re: Is there a way to write out the process of the cumulative minimum of a Brown Motion process?, matt271829-news, 09:36
- equilateral triangles in space, and cyclohexane, David Madore, 09:05
- Re: convexity of log(x), Dave Seaman, 08:53
- Re: Recognizing Straight Lines, Han de Bruijn, 08:51
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Ulysse from CH, 08:47
- Re: How many ordinals?, Dave L. Renfro, 08:36
- Re: JSH: Truth is the highest ideal, gjedwards, 08:23
- Re: convexity of log(x), John, 08:11
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, Mark Spahn, 08:04
- Re: topology with connected., mina_world, 08:00
- Re: " f o f = g ; f a half effect of g ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 07:55
- Re: My world, David Moran, 07:37
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tez, 07:35
- [] Rotations - why are they not vectors, William Elliot, 07:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:22
- Re: sign of the determinant of an augmented matrix?, Chip Eastham, 07:20
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Jeremy Boden, 07:17
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Catarina Dias, 07:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:07
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:00
- How many ordinals?, William Elliot, 06:56
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 06:54
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, David C . Ullrich, 06:53
- Re: maths for programming C++, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 06:44
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, William Elliot, 06:43
- Re: topology with connected., William Elliot, 06:38
- Re: Do The Math: Save Gas By Driving Slower, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 06:36
- Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., David C . Ullrich, 06:34
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 06:33
- Re: "useful" math, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 06:27
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Andrew Taylor, 06:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 05:59
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Rupert, 05:55
- Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon, exluding a disc, anders, 05:29
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 05:18
- Re: noncommutative algebra book recommendation?, Boris Novikov, 04:51
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, vinay.sri48@xxxxxxxxx, 04:50
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, vinay.sri48@xxxxxxxxx, 04:48
- Re: noncommutative algebra book recommendation?, victor_meldrew_666, 04:46
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, guenther vonKnakspot, 04:20
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, mike4ty4, 04:16
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, Gib Bogle, 03:25
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, Phil Carmody, 03:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 03:21
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, Virgil, 03:06
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, Gerry Myerson, 03:04
- Re: A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question, Proginoskes, 03:02
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Proginoskes, 03:00
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, Proginoskes, 02:57
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, Proginoskes, 02:56
- Re: Another look at triangle number factoring., Proginoskes, 02:46
- Re: D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, Phil Carmody, 02:45
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 02:41
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, Luc The Perverse, 02:39
- Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon, exluding a disc, Ray Koopman, 02:13
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 02:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, ytyourclothes, 02:02
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, don, 01:59
- Re: JSH: My world, jshsucks, 01:57
- Re: sign of the determinant of an augmented matrix?, Robert Israel, 01:53
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, ytyourclothes, 01:52
- Re: JSH: Truth is the highest ideal, jshsucks, 01:51
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, W. Dale Hall, 01:49
- Re: A Natural Axiom which disproves the Continuum Hypothesis, Slavko Rede, 01:41
- Comments on a post to FOM, Ross A. Finlayson, 01:40
- Re: Does WinTeX Exist?, BlagooBlanaa, 01:36
- JSH: Truth is the highest ideal, jstevh, 01:18
- Re: topology with connected., mina_world, 01:06
- JSH: My world, jstevh, 01:06
- Re: Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, atkrunner, 00:43
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, G man, 00:34
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Robert Israel, 00:33
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Norman Wildberger, 00:31
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, Jennifer, 00:26
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, William Elliot, 00:22
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, William Elliot, 00:15
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, Robert Israel, 00:13
- Re: inverting a cubic polynomial as a series, Paul Abbott, 00:12
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, William Elliot, 00:09
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, ytyourclothes, 00:07
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, fishfry, 00:06
- Re: JSH: Gloves are off now, Patrick Hull, 00:05
- JSH: Gloves are off now, jsteuh@xxxxxxx, 00:00
July 19, 2006
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, John Schutkeker, 23:59
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, William Elliot, 23:55
- Re: A coding theory question involving cosets and syndromes, Gerry Myerson, 23:50
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Sven Geier, 23:38
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, William Elliot, 23:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:29
- Re: Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, Ronald Bruck, 23:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:23
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:16
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, msustik, 23:10
- Re: sign of the determinant of an augmented matrix?, Chip Eastham, 23:03
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 22:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:33
- Re: Does WinTeX Exist?, Ronald Bruck, 22:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:25
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:14
- Re: inverting a cubic polynomial as a series, pluton, 22:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:11
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 22:11
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, Chip Eastham, 22:08
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 22:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:05
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 22:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 22:00
- Re: A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question, Robert Israel, 22:00
- Signal Nonlocality Loophole in Quantum Theory?, Jack Sarfatti, 21:59
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:47
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 21:39
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 21:36
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 21:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 21:32
- sign of the determinant of an augmented matrix?, Mark, 21:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 21:13
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown, 20:59
- possible to use Generalized Method of Moments for this problem?, Lucy, 20:49
- D-numbers: a generalization of Sophie Germain twin primes, wkehowski@xxxxxxx, 20:48
- Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...?, atkrunner, 20:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:45
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:39
- reference books for formulaes in stochastic analysis and random processes?, Michael, 20:38
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 20:27
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Rupert, 20:26
- Re: Textbook on Filters, Fritz, 20:22
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, mark snyder, 20:15
- Re: Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, John Schutkeker, 20:11
- Re: Textbook on Filters, John Schutkeker, 20:07
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Gerry Myerson, 20:05
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 19:57
- Re: " 2x*ln(x) = f(x)*ln(f(x)) + f ^ -1(x) *ln(f ^ -1(x)) ", Robert Israel, 19:52
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 19:52
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:49
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 19:45
- Re: please recommend good reference book on mathematics?, Michael, 19:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 19:41
- Re: Does WinTeX Exist?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:38
- Re: Homology of a certain space question, James, 19:38
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, W. Dale Hall, 19:36
- Re: Another homology question, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 19:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, MoeBlee, 19:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 19:31
- Does WinTeX Exist?, John Schutkeker, 19:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 19:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 19:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, MoeBlee, 19:22
- Re: Basic question on Homology group, Meg Weiss, 19:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 19:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 19:16
- Re: Expectation value in terms of cumulative distribution, Ray Koopman, 19:12
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Chris Smith, 19:10
- A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question, mathlover, 19:02
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Jeremy Boden, 19:00
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:59
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Patricia Shanahan, 18:57
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Dann Corbit, 18:50
- Re: Another homology question, James, 18:49
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:47
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:45
- Re: Complex analysis question, The World Wide Wade, 18:43
- Re: Clifford Numbers in Mathcad, The Dougster, 18:42
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:39
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:19
- Re: Another homology question, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 18:17
- Re: Basic question on Homology group, Meg Weiss, 18:17
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:12
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 18:09
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 18:01
- Re: Homology of a certain space question, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 17:59
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, David R Tribble, 17:53
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 17:52
- Another homology question, James, 17:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown, 17:50
- Re: Expectation value in terms of cumulative distribution, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 17:47
- Re: Expectation value in terms of cumulative distribution, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:45
- Fourier Transform / Decay / Canot set, don, 17:41
- noncommutative algebra book recommendation?, adomplayer, 17:35
- Expectation value in terms of cumulative distribution, Randy Poe, 17:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Dave L. Renfro, 17:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 17:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 17:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 17:24
- Homology of a certain space question, James, 17:22
- Uniform point picking on a hexagon, exluding a disc, Olw, 17:21
- Re: A property of the parabolas, Felicis@xxxxxxxxx, 17:11
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, Butch Malahide, 16:57
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 16:47
- Re: Basic question on Homology group, Lee Rudolph, 16:32
- Re: axiom of choice independent of ZF?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:28
- Re: please recommend good reference book on mathematics?, Ronald Bruck, 16:19
- A coding theory question involving cosets and syndromes, jeffconner50, 16:12
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, Phil Carmody, 16:08
- Basic question on Homology group, Meg Weiss, 16:00
- Re: a^4+b^4 = c^4+d^4, JoeS, 15:30
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Patricia Shanahan, 15:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:00
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:53
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, Dave Seaman, 14:48
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Chris Smith, 14:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:47
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 14:40
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, Chip Eastham, 14:38
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 14:33
- Re: " 2x*ln(x) = f(x)*ln(f(x)) + f ^ -1(x) *ln(f ^ -1(x)) ", Patrick Coilland, 14:33
- Re: " 2x*ln(x) = f(x)*ln(f(x)) + f ^ -1(x) *ln(f ^ -1(x)) ", Patrick Coilland, 14:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 14:29
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Phil Carmody, 14:29
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 14:25
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Yiftach Barnea, 14:22
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, MoeBlee, 14:15
- Re: Vector field flow problem - help?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 14:12
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 14:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Chris Menzel, 14:04
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 14:04
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 14:02
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 13:58
- Re: scalar functions on non-diagonalizable matrices, Robert Israel, 13:55
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 13:47
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, MoeBlee, 13:42
- Re: " 2x*ln(x) = f(x)*ln(f(x)) + f ^ -1(x) *ln(f ^ -1(x)) ", Robert Israel, 13:41
- Re: uni. convergence, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:41
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:35
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:31
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 13:31
- Re: " 2x*ln(x) = f(x)*ln(f(x)) + f ^ -1(x) *ln(f ^ -1(x)) ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 13:29
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:28
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:26
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Pubkeybreaker, 13:22
- Re: induction, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:21
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:15
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Jeremy Boden, 13:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:13
- Re: uni. convergence, The World Wide Wade, 13:11
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:10
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:06
- Re: Functional analysis?, Robert Israel, 13:06
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:58
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Arturo Magidin, 12:52
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:52
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:50
- induction, none, 12:46
- Re: convexity of log(x), C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:43
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 12:43
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, Butch Malahide, 12:38
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Chris Smith, 12:38
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 12:15
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:13
- Re: topology with connected., Arturo Magidin, 12:12
- Re: " 2x*ln(x) = f(x)*ln(f(x)) + f ^ -1(x) *ln(f ^ -1(x)) ", Patrick Coilland, 12:06
- convexity of log(x), John, 12:01
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, Richard Henry, 11:58
- Re: modelling method for categorical data, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:56
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, MTD, 11:54
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, David C . Ullrich, 11:51
- Re: scalar functions on non-diagonalizable matrices, xyz91234, 11:45
- Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., Juryu, 11:45
- Hack the Mirror, CoreyWhite@xxxxxxxxx, 11:39
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 11:24
- " 2x*ln(x) = f(x)*ln(f(x)) + f ^ -1(x) *ln(f ^ -1(x)) ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 10:55
- Re: algebraic function (was: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:36
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, CapCity, 10:27
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:26
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, Larry Lard, 10:19
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 10:16
- Re: algebraic function (was: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, David W . Cantrell, 10:01
- Functional analysis?, e_hobsbawm, 09:55
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, briggs, 09:48
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 09:47
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 09:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:30
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, David C . Ullrich, 09:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:16
- Re: Using all digits..., Patrick Coilland, 09:16
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, Lee Rudolph, 09:13
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, Richard Tobin, 09:12
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, Lee Rudolph, 09:12
- Re: Are Wikipedia's rules of inference correct?, David C . Ullrich, 09:12
- Re: Using all digits..., The Qurqirish Dragon, 09:07
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, G. A. Edgar, 09:03
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:53
- Re: Complex analysis question, David C . Ullrich, 08:52
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, William Elliot, 08:52
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Lee Rudolph, 08:49
- Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., David C . Ullrich, 08:45
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Pubkeybreaker, 08:44
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, William Elliot, 08:37
- algebraic function (was: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, A N Niel, 08:29
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, Rod, 08:27
- Re: Off topic but it makes you think, Patrick Coilland, 08:25
- Off topic but it makes you think, prime-numb, 08:13
- Re: axiom of choice independent of ZF?, Aatu Koskensilta, 08:12
- modelling method for categorical data, Arby, 08:09
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 08:05
- Re: axiom of choice independent of ZF?, Peter Webb, 08:00
- Re: question with 0/0., Dave Seaman, 07:54
- [] "Cool" inductive proofs, William Elliot, 07:52
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 07:51
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Dirk Van de moortel, 07:46
- Re: uni. convergence, G.E. Ivey, 07:44
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, William Elliot, 07:41
- Re: " f o f = g ; f a half effect of g ", matt271829-news, 07:38
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Dirk Van de moortel, 07:30
- Re: question with 0/0., David W . Cantrell, 07:20
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, jmfbahciv, 07:16
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, William Elliot, 07:12
- axiom of choice independent of ZF?, alberthendriks@xxxxxxxxx, 07:04
- Re: question with 0/0., mina_world, 07:04
- Re: topology with connected., William Elliot, 07:02
- uni. convergence, bill, 06:59
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:56
- Re: a^4+b^4 = c^4+d^4, titus_piezas, 06:55
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, William Elliot, 06:55
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 06:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown, 06:44
- Re: In which (ordered) spaces an increasing sequence has a limit?, William Elliot, 06:43
- Re: question with 0/0., David W . Cantrell, 06:36
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Han . deBruijn, 06:36
- Vector field flow problem - help?, Daniel Nierro, 06:28
- question with 0/0., mina_world, 06:28
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 06:18
- Re: topology with connected., mina_world, 06:06
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David Bernier, 05:58
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, jmfbahciv, 05:56
- Re: Using all digits..., Andor, 05:56
- Re: Recognizing Straight Lines, Han de Bruijn, 05:49
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:49
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, ben, 05:44
- Re: topology with connected., toni . lassila, 05:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:38
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:27
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:19
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Richard Tobin, 05:13
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Ken Oliver, 05:07
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, ben, 05:06
- Re: Calculus Question, mitch, 04:38
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, Butch Malahide, 04:22
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Butch Malahide, 03:58
- Re: a^4+b^4 = c^4+d^4, David Bernier, 03:58
- Re: Using all digits..., Patrick Coilland, 03:46
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Butch Malahide, 03:40
- Re: Recognizing Straight Lines, Han de Bruijn, 03:35
- Re: 1<<b,n,m; b^n mod m by modular exponentiation, The Dougster, 03:30
- Re: Calculus Question, Dirk Van de moortel, 03:18
- Is there a way to write out the process of the cumulative minimum of a Brown Motion process?, Michael, 03:16
- Re: topology with connected., mina_world, 03:09
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Gerry Myerson, 02:52
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 02:38
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Chris Smith, 02:28
- Re: topology with connected., The World Wide Wade, 02:26
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Virgil, 02:18
- Re: phi(p) = p-1; phi(c) | (c-1)?, The Dougster, 02:14
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, Richard Henry, 02:10
- Re: topology with connected., William Elliot, 02:09
- Re: "Cool" inductive proofs, William Elliot, 02:01
- Re: discrete maths book (after searching archives), arnuld, 01:54
- a^4+b^4 = c^4+d^4, titus_piezas, 01:52
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Narasimham, 01:42
- "Cool" inductive proofs, Chris Smith, 01:37
- Re: Trying to Understand the Set Theory of Non-Standard Analysis, Gene Ward Smith, 01:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 01:24
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Rupert, 00:56
- topology with connected., mina_world, 00:55
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Rupert, 00:53
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 00:52
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 00:49
July 18, 2006
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 23:56
- Trying to Understand the Set Theory of Non-Standard Analysis, Math1723, 23:52
- [] Question about well-ordering the reals, William Elliot, 23:52
- Re: Don't cha wish ur gf was hot like me, levine555, 23:48
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, William Elliot, 23:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:38
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 23:33
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 23:26
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Gerry Myerson, 23:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 23:18
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 23:16
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 23:06
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Robert Israel, 23:05
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 23:03
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 22:55
- Re: inverting a cubic polynomial as a series, David W . Cantrell, 22:54
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 22:43
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, Chip Eastham, 22:43
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 22:34
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Gene Ward Smith, 22:30
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 21:59
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown, 21:51
- Re: Calculus Question, Oscar Lanzi III, 21:30
- Re: Self reference, Gib Bogle, 21:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 21:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 21:18
- Re: randomized Donsker-type results, Herman Rubin, 21:17
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Rupert, 21:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 21:08
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Rupert, 20:59
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, Herman Rubin, 20:57
- Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, matt271829-news, 20:51
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, bill, 20:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:49
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 20:47
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 20:46
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Rupert, 20:36
- Re: MTV Casting, Chuck Grempu, 20:34
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, matt271829-news, 20:34
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Chuck Grempu, 20:33
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 20:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:23
- Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Alun, 20:19
- Re: Fundamental region for the modular group, Rupert, 20:14
- Re: 1<<b,n,m; b^n mod m by modular exponentiation, The Dougster, 20:05
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:04
- Re: Self reference, fishfry, 20:02
- Re: Are Wikipedia's rules of inference correct?, Chip Eastham, 20:01
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Rupert, 19:55
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 19:53
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, John Schutkeker, 19:52
- Re: Are Wikipedia's rules of inference correct?, Mike H, 19:39
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 19:34
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Gerry Myerson, 19:30
- Re: Using all digits..., Gerry Myerson, 19:18
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:17
- Re: Another complex analysis question, david petry, 19:04
- Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, matt271829-news, 19:02
- Re: 1<<b,n,m; b^n mod m by modular exponentiation, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 19:00
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Karl Malbrain, 18:59
- Point Defects in Emergent Vacuum ODLRO Geometrodynamics, Jack Sarfatti, 18:52
- Re: about uni. continuous proof, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 18:51
- Re: Do The Math: Save Gas By Driving Slower, mika, 18:49
- Re: please recommend good reference book on mathematics?, Dave Seaman, 18:41
- Re: Are Wikipedia's rules of inference correct?, Chip Eastham, 18:32
- about uni. continuous proof, bill, 18:30
- Re: Do The Math: Save Gas By Driving Slower, Aristos, 18:29
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, MoeBlee, 18:21
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:20
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:19
- Re: Self reference, donstockbauer, 18:15
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, John Schutkeker, 18:08
- Re: Graph Theory - Vertex Colouring, Randy Poe, 18:06
- Re: Graph Theory - Vertex Colouring, wojciech, 17:55
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 17:54
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 17:45
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 17:42
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Dave L. Renfro, 17:41
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 17:39
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 17:39
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Karl Malbrain, 17:36
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 17:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 17:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 17:30
- Re: A property of the parabolas, José Carlos Santos, 17:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 17:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 17:23
- Through the looking glass, CoreyWhite@xxxxxxxxx, 17:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 17:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 17:08
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 17:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 17:05
- Re: please recommend good reference book on mathematics?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:03
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, John Schutkeker, 17:02
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 16:59
- Are Wikipedia's rules of inference correct?, Mike H, 16:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 16:55
- Re: please recommend good reference book on mathematics?, Dave L. Renfro, 16:54
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Dave L. Renfro, 16:45
- Re: please recommend good reference book on mathematics?, Ronald Bruck, 16:41
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Dave L. Renfro, 16:34
- Self reference, Gib Bogle, 16:31
- Re: A property of the parabolas, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 16:28
- Re: 1<<b,n,m; b^n mod m by modular exponentiation, The Dougster, 16:17
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Dave Rusin, 16:12
- Re: phi(p) = p-1; phi(c) | (c-1)?, The Dougster, 16:11
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, Virgil, 15:54
- please recommend good reference book on mathematics?, Michael, 15:54
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, John Schutkeker, 15:46
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:43
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, David R Tribble, 15:39
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Aatu Koskensilta, 15:35
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 15:28
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, John Schutkeker, 15:27
- Re: SF: Definitely a new factoring method, Chip Eastham, 15:26
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:25
- Re: In which (ordered) spaces an increasing sequence has a limit?, Robert Israel, 15:23
- Re: Bounded Sequences, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 15:23
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:17
- Re: SF: Definitely a new factoring method, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:11
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:09
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Justin, 15:07
- Another look at triangle number factoring., Dan, 15:05
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:59
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, Keith A. Lewis, 14:55
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), Patrick Coilland, 14:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:48
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:47
- Re: phi(p) = p-1; phi(c) | (c-1)?, stush, 14:47
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), Frederick Umminger, 14:45
- Re: 1<<b,n,m; b^n mod m by modular exponentiation, stush, 14:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, MoeBlee, 14:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:38
- Re: Fundamental region for the modular group, Timothy Murphy, 14:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:23
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:11
- Re: Using all digits..., Whatever5k, 14:08
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:07
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, A N Niel, 13:59
- Re: Complex analysis question, The World Wide Wade, 13:57
- Re: Recognizing Straight Lines, ab, 13:51
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 13:48
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, A N Niel, 13:45
- Re: discrete maths book (after searching archives), arnuld, 13:41
- Re: Using all digits..., kunzmilan, 13:34
- Re: SF: Definitely a new factoring method, Chip Eastham, 13:29
- Re: inverting a cubic polynomial as a series, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 13:25
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, John Schutkeker, 13:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:20
- Re: 1<<b,n,m; b^n mod m by modular exponentiation, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 13:17
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, John Schutkeker, 13:16
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, John Schutkeker, 13:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:01
- Re: Complex Analysis question, Taylor series, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 13:00
- Re: scalar functions on non-diagonalizable matrices, alex . lupas, 12:59
- Re: Golay codes, PaulHjelmstad, 12:57
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, MoeBlee, 12:56
- MTV Casting, MTVprodigy, 12:48
- Re: phi(p) = p-1; phi(c) | (c-1)?, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 12:47
- Re: Golay codes, PaulHjelmstad, 12:44
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, Frank Palmer, 12:41
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Dave L. Renfro, 12:40
- Re: discrete maths book (after searching archives), Dave L. Renfro, 12:35
- Re: phi(p) = p-1; phi(c) | (c-1)?, Arturo Magidin, 12:27
- Re: Complex Analysis question, Taylor series, Jannick Asmus, 12:24
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Arturo Magidin, 12:22
- Re: Calculus Question, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:18
- Re: Mathieu Group M12, Arturo Magidin, 12:12
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, Arthur Dent, 12:12
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, Arthur Dent, 12:11
- phi(p) = p-1; phi(c) | (c-1)?, Doug Goncz, 12:11
- discrete maths book (after searching archives), arnuld, 12:10
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Karl Malbrain, 12:07
- Re: Bounded Sequences, Jennifer, 11:52
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, MTD, 11:52
- Re: Complex Analysis question, Taylor series, James, 11:51
- Re: SF: Definitely a new factoring method, Jennifer, 11:47
- Re: Quasi chinese remainder theorem, W. Dale Hall, 11:39
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, Patrick Coilland, 11:38
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Jennifer, 11:35
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Jennifer, 11:33
- Re: Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, Randy Poe, 11:29
- memory requirement, wei, 11:26
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 11:23
- Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, The Qurqirish Dragon, 11:18
- Re: Complex Analysis question, Taylor series, A N Niel, 11:15
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, A N Niel, 11:11
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, A N Niel, 11:08
- Re: Complex analysis question, David C . Ullrich, 11:07
- Re: Another complex analysis question, James, 11:03
- Probability of attaining a minimum value when rolling dice, nick, 10:57
- Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., Robert Israel, 10:55
- Re: scalar functions on non-diagonalizable matrices, alex . lupas, 10:52
- Calculus Question, mitch, 10:46
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:39
- Re: Another complex analysis question, David C . Ullrich, 10:31
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Lee Rudolph, 10:28
- Re: Bounded Sequences, The Qurqirish Dragon, 10:27
- Re: New branch of mathematics, G. A. Edgar, 10:21
- Re: Complex Analysis question, Taylor series, James, 10:19
- Re: Complex Analysis question, Taylor series, James, 10:18
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, A N Niel, 10:18
- Complex Analysis question, Taylor series, James, 10:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 10:15
- Bounded Sequences, knash2, 10:11
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:57
- Re: Another complex analysis question, Jannick Asmus, 09:56
- Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, christriddle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 09:49
- randomized Donsker-type results, gasparuk, 09:46
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, David C . Ullrich, 09:26
- Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., David C . Ullrich, 09:21
- Textbook on Filters, Fritz, 09:15
- Re: A property of the parabolas, Patrick Coilland, 09:15
- Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, matt271829-news, 09:14
- Re: A property of the parabolas, Ulysse from CH, 09:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:49
- Recognizing Straight Lines, Han de Bruijn, 08:37
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, William Elliot, 08:33
- [] Question about well-ordering the reals, William Elliot, 08:30
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:26
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 08:25
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Ulysse from CH, 08:18
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:18
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Dave L. Renfro, 08:14
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:04
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, John Schutkeker, 07:54
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Dave Seaman, 07:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:44
- Re: Fundamental region for the modular group, Lee Rudolph, 07:43
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Dave Seaman, 07:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:40
- Re: Tarski fixed-point theorem, Chip Eastham, 07:39
- Re: Do The Math: Save Gas By Driving Slower, Doug Goncz, 07:22
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Dik T. Winter, 07:22
- 1<<b,n,m; b^n mod m by modular exponentiation, Doug Goncz, 07:17
- Using all digits..., Whatever5k, 07:16
- A property of the parabolas, José Carlos Santos, 07:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:01
- Re: Fundamental region for the modular group, Timothy Murphy, 07:01
- Re: maths for programming C++, ma740988, 07:01
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:54
- Re: Continued fraction of e and approximation order, Timothy Murphy, 06:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 06:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 06:36
- Tarski fixed-point theorem, William Elliot, 06:24
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, John Schutkeker, 06:15
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Richard Herring, 06:09
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tez, 06:09
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, William Elliot, 05:46
- Re: span of matrices, Ulysse from CH, 05:40
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 04:58
- Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, christriddle, 04:54
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Patricia Shanahan, 04:54
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 04:42
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 04:28
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, Rupert, 04:20
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 04:17
- Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, christriddle, 04:14
- Re: Question about well-ordering the reals, William Elliot, 04:05
- Question about well-ordering the reals, lugita15, 03:41
- Re: " f o f = g ; f a half effect of g ", Patrick Coilland, 03:38
- Re: [Group Theory] Normal => Characteristic, Jim Heckman, 03:32
- Re: Annihilators, Trav, 03:27
- Re: inverting a cubic polynomial as a series, alex . lupas, 03:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Nam Nguyen, 03:03
- Continued fraction of e and approximation order, eugene, 03:02
- Re: " f o f = g ; f a half effect of g ", Patrick Coilland, 02:59
- Re: Do The Math: Save Gas By Driving Slower, Richard Henry, 02:36
- Re: Definitely a new factoring method, Gib Bogle, 02:27
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:53
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, ben, 01:48
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown, 01:29
- Re: inverting a cubic polynomial as a series, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 01:25
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 01:17
- Re: In which (ordered) spaces an increasing sequence has a limit?, William Elliot, 01:05
- Re: In which (ordered) spaces an increasing sequence has a limit?, William Elliot, 01:04
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Bill Taylor, 01:04
- inverting a cubic polynomial as a series, pluton, 00:54
- Re: Derivatives of the Mathieu functions, Paul Abbott, 00:54
- Re: Definitely a new factoring method, Usher73, 00:53
- Re: Do The Math: Save Gas By Driving Slower, Tom, 00:51
- Jungian Archetypes in Post-Quantum Psychotronics, Jack Sarfatti, 00:40
- Re: Do The Math: Save Gas By Driving Slower, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:36
- Re: Do The Math: Save Gas By Driving Slower, Jason Pawloski, 00:34
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:34
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 00:08
July 17, 2006
- Do The Math: Save Gas By Driving Slower, virtualadepts, 23:48
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 23:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown, 23:29
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Rupert, 23:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 23:19
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 23:16
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 23:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 23:09
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, David Bernier, 23:07
- Re: scalar functions on non-diagonalizable matrices, xyz91234, 23:01
- Re: Matrix Inverse Question, John Schutkeker, 23:01
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 22:59
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Jason Pawloski, 22:55
- Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Gene Ward Smith, 22:55
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 22:52
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Jonathan Hoyle, 22:33
- Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 22:29
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 22:28
- Re: Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Gerry Myerson, 22:26
- Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, John Schutkeker, 22:24
- Re: sequence of polynomials, Robert Israel, 22:20
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, jstevh, 22:02
- Re: Continuing puzzle, Rick Decker, 21:44
- Re: " f o f = g ; f a half effect of g ", matt271829-news, 21:39
- Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 21:38
- Re: " f o f = g ; f a half effect of g ", matt271829-news, 21:32
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 21:25
- sequence of polynomials, Artur, 21:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 21:16
- Re: Conic section Edge Flattened Curves, Narasimham, 21:16
- Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., Juryu, 21:14
- Re: Matrix Inverse Question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:11
- Re: maths for programming C++, stush, 20:57
- Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, stush, 20:53
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Justin, 20:45
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:44
- Re: New branch of mathematics, Justin, 20:41
- Re: maths for programming C++, ma740988, 20:38
- "useful" math, Herman Rubin, 20:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, MoeBlee, 20:24
- Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, fernando revilla, 20:05
- Re: New branch of mathematics, Chuck Grempu, 19:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:41
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 19:37
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:35
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Karl Malbrain, 19:22
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, Chip Eastham, 19:14
- Re: Fundamental region for the modular group, Rupert, 19:13
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 19:10
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 19:09
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 19:08
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 19:07
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, John Schutkeker, 18:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 18:44
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Russell Easterly, 18:36
- Re: [Group Theory] Normal => Characteristic, Jim Heckman, 18:32
- Re: Complex analysis question, david petry, 18:30
- Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Doug Goncz, 18:28
- Re: Continuing puzzle, Chuck Grempu, 18:21
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Jeremy Boden, 18:20
- Re: New branch of mathematics, david petry, 18:13
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 18:10
- Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, John Schutkeker, 18:03
- Re: Matrix Inverse Question, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 18:02
- memory requirement, wei, 18:01
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 18:00
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 17:57
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, John Schutkeker, 17:55
- Re: DSP audio signals, John Schutkeker, 17:51
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 17:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 17:44
- New branch of mathematics, Charlie, 17:44
- Re: Matrix Inverse Question, Randy Poe, 17:42
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Karl Malbrain, 17:38
- Re: Matrix Inverse Question, John Schutkeker, 17:37
- Re: In which (ordered) spaces an increasing sequence has a limit?, Robert Israel, 17:34
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 17:33
- Re: Mathieu Group M12, PaulHjelmstad, 17:32
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 17:29
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Karl Malbrain, 17:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Patricia Shanahan, 17:27
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 17:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 17:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Karl Malbrain, 17:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 17:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Jiri Lebl, 17:14
- Re: Degrees of freedom = # constraints ?, TTroy, 17:10
- Re: Degrees of freedom = # constraints ?, Randy Poe, 17:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Andrew Bettilyon, 17:02
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Karl Malbrain, 16:55
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 16:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:51
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown, 16:51
- Re: Degrees of freedom = # constraints ?, TTroy, 16:47
- Re: Complex analysis question, Robert Israel, 16:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:39
- Re: Degrees of freedom = # constraints ?, Randy Poe, 16:36
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Jiri Lebl, 16:33
- Re: Alternative Trigonometry: [Was: Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?], Andrew Bettilyon, 16:33
- Fundamental region for the modular group, Timothy Murphy, 16:32
- Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, Dann Corbit, 16:24
- Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, matt271829-news, 16:01
- Degrees of freedom = # constraints ?, TTroy, 16:00
- Re: Exponential Growth/Decay, Computers Guru, 15:40
- Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, Pubkeybreaker, 15:33
- Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, matt271829-news, 15:29
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Karl Malbrain, 15:22
- Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, matt271829-news, 15:16
- In which (ordered) spaces an increasing sequence has a limit?, lataianu bogdan, 15:11
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown, 15:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:07
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Virgil, 15:00
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, John Schutkeker, 14:52
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Robert Israel, 14:51
- Re: Mathieu Group M12, Arturo Magidin, 14:47
- Re: Complex analysis question, eugene, 14:40
- Re: Normal => Characteristic, , 14:37
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, David R Tribble, 14:34
- Re: Mathieu Group M12, PaulHjelmstad, 14:30
- Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, Dave L. Renfro, 14:28
- Another complex analysis question, James, 14:08
- Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, Robert Israel, 14:04
- Re: polynomials in a difference table, Robert Israel, 13:56
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Chuck Grempu, 13:56
- Re: Way too interesting, Chuck Grempu, 13:54
- Re: scalar functions on non-diagonalizable matrices, A N Niel, 13:47
- scalar functions on non-diagonalizable matrices, xyz91234, 13:37
- Re: Solving exponential inequality: a^x + b = c^x ???, Ioannis, 13:28
- Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, Pubkeybreaker, 13:23
- Complex analysis question, James, 13:19
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, johnjo, 13:08
- Re: Exponential Growth/Decay, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:06
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow, 12:56
- Re: Mathieu Group M12, Arturo Magidin, 12:55
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Karl Malbrain, 12:54
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, David Moran, 12:47
- Re: Mathieu Group M12, , 12:40
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Patricia Shanahan, 12:33
- Re: Mathieu Group M12, PaulHjelmstad, 12:32
- Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., Robert Israel, 12:32
- Exponential Growth/Decay, Computers Guru, 12:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Karl Malbrain, 12:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, abo, 11:50
- Re: Mathieu Group M12, Arturo Magidin, 11:41
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Patricia Shanahan, 11:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:32
- Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Alun, 11:27
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 11:25
- Re: " f o f = g ; f a half effect of g ", Patrick Coilland, 11:14
- Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 11:07
- " f o f = g ; f a half effect of g ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 11:02
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:02
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:58
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 10:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:51
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Toni Lassila, 10:48
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, mathedman, 10:47
- Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:44
- Intersection between a small and great circle, christriddle, 10:43
- Re: Distribution of Goldbach pairs as even integers n increases, Jens Kruse Andersen, 10:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:40
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, abo, 10:39
- Re: symmetry in eigenvectors-, JEMebius, 10:39
- Re: Military logistic problem, christriddle, 10:37
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 10:26
- Mathieu Group M12, PaulHjelmstad, 10:21
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Patricia Shanahan, 10:19
- Re: polynomials in a difference table, Bart, 10:17
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), Eighty, 10:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:00
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 09:46
- Re: Quasi chinese remainder theorem, Jose Capco, 09:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:40
- Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, David C . Ullrich, 09:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, abo, 09:33
- Re: symmetry in eigenvectors, Chip Eastham, 09:32
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:29
- Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., David C . Ullrich, 09:24
- Quasi chinese remainder theorem, Jose Capco, 09:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 09:18
- Re: symmetry in eigenvectors, A N Niel, 09:16
- symmetry in eigenvectors, Al, 09:09
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, David C . Ullrich, 09:05
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Lasse, 08:56
- Re: Normal => Characteristic, trivecteur, 08:46
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, Aatu Koskensilta, 08:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Kevin Karn, 08:29
- Re: Continuing puzzle, David Moran, 08:03
- Re: Dedanoe quits, John Schutkeker, 07:18
- Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, John Schutkeker, 07:16
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 07:15
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 07:07
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 06:58
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 06:58
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 06:58
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 06:58
- Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, John Schutkeker, 06:51
- approximating infinite linear programming problems, diegotorquemada, 06:29
- Finding a Web Design Development with a Good Results, lbardagol, 06:21
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, James Dolan, 06:04
- Re: Solving exponential inequality: a^x + b = c^x ???, Robert Israel, 05:40
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 17, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:38
- Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, Larry Lard, 05:35
- Household Use for Trigonometry?, John Schutkeker, 05:23
- Re: [Group Theory] Normal => Characteristic, , 05:08
- Re: thesis about singapore math, clau, 04:41
- Re: Consistency of Classical Analysis: "Unproven", Rupert, 04:32
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, ben, 04:29
- Re: Consistency of Classical Analysis: "Unproven", Rupert, 04:27
- Re: Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Dhandapani, 04:26
- Re: Solving exponential inequality: a^x + b = c^x ???, William Elliot, 04:26
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, ben, 04:21
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Han de Bruijn, 04:13
- Re: *unique* prime factorizations; the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, Doug Goncz, 04:13
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 04:10
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Han de Bruijn, 03:56
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Phil Carmody, 03:23
- Re: Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Rupert, 03:19
- Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Phil Carmody, 03:16
- Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Patrick Coilland, 03:08
- Re: Solving exponential inequality: a^x + b = c^x ???, Patrick Coilland, 03:00
- Re: a basic question concerning zeta-function/zeta-zeroes, Gottfried Helms, 02:46
- Re: Consistency of Classical Analysis: "Unproven", David Bernier, 02:42
- sum((1+r)^(-t))=integral(exp(-r t)), vjp2 . at, 02:29
- Re: Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Gerry Myerson, 02:17
- Re: Continuing puzzle, Proginoskes, 02:09
- Re: Solving exponential inequality: a^x + b = c^x ???, Angelina . Paris, 02:07
- Re: Reducing P to NP-complete, Proginoskes, 02:01
- Re: simple DE/IVP, or is it?, Robert Israel, 01:55
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Proginoskes, 01:55
- Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Proginoskes, 01:49
- Re: A problem related to equidistribution., Robert Israel, 01:49
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:45
- Re: career opportunities in mathematics...., mathwiz, 01:34
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 01:34
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Chuck Grempu, 01:32
- Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, Chuck Grempu, 01:29
- Re: Solving exponential inequality: a^x + b = c^x ???, moriman, 01:18
- Re: *unique* prime factorizations; the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, Proginoskes, 01:15
- Re: distance matrix consolidation, bird, 01:15
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Dale Shoults, 01:06
- Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., Juryu, 01:05
- Distribution of Goldbach pairs as even integers n increases, stargene@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:02
- Re: Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Dhandapani, 00:52
- Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, Gib Bogle, 00:33
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, jw12jw12jw12, 00:31
- Re: Solving exponential inequality: a^x + b = c^x ???, James Waldby, 00:29
- Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:26
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, The World Wide Wade, 00:21
- Re: Consistency of Classical Analysis: "Unproven", Keith Ramsay, 00:17
July 16, 2006
- Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, Tim Peters, 23:55
- Solving exponential inequality: a^x + b = c^x ???, Angelina . Paris, 23:51
- Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, Tim Peters, 23:47
- Reducing P to NP-complete, ahuznot, 23:45
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Gerry Myerson, 23:38
- Re: Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Gerry Myerson, 23:36
- Re: Remote Viewing as Operational Intelligence Gathering, blair . houghton, 23:33
- Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, Gerry Myerson, 23:26
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, fishfry, 23:05
- Remote Viewing as Operational Intelligence Gathering, Jack Sarfatti, 23:04
- Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, fishfry, 23:04
- Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, fishfry, 23:00
- Re: Operator Overloading (Sets and Numbers), fishfry, 22:58
- [] Rotations - why are they not vectors, William Elliot, 22:51
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 22:38
- Re: metric spaces, William Elliot, 22:31
- Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, Rupert, 22:29
- Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:28
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, T.H. Ray, 22:14
- Re: Combinatorics, Thomas Mautsch, 22:01
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:00
- Re: thesis about singapore math, Karl M. Bunday, 21:46
- Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, Karl M. Bunday, 21:43
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 21:21
- Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Alun, 21:09
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Gene Ward Smith, 20:57
- Re: Continuing puzzle, David Moran, 20:54
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 20:49
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 20:49
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 20:49
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Gerry Myerson, 20:37
- JSH: Continuing puzzle, jstevh, 20:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 20:15
- career opportunities in mathematics...., raza, 20:13
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 20:09
- Re: Conic section Edge Flattened Curves, Robert Israel, 19:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:57
- Re: simple DE/IVP, or is it?, Luke Wu, 19:57
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:35
- Re: simple DE/IVP, or is it?, Robert Israel, 19:32
- Re: A contour integral - sin(x)/sqrt(x), Juryu, 19:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:21
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Oscar Lanzi III, 19:21
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:17
- Re: A problem related to equidistribution., Gerry Myerson, 19:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 18:59
- Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Nameless, 18:57
- Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Nameless, 18:52
- Re: A contour integral - sin(x)/sqrt(x), Narcoleptic Insomniac, 18:29
- Conic section Edge Flattened Curves, Narasimham, 18:19
- Re: *unique* prime factorizations; the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:16
- Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., Robert Israel, 18:16
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, Patricia Shanahan, 18:16
- simple DE/IVP, or is it?, Luke Wu, 18:02
- Re: A contour integral - sin(x)/sqrt(x), Narcoleptic Insomniac, 17:53
- Re: *unique* prime factorizations; the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, Robert Israel, 17:53
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, Phil Carmody, 17:44
- Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Phil Carmody, 17:42
- A contour integral - sin(x)/sqrt(x), Juryu, 17:09
- Re: [OT] USENETiquette; was: Re: "proportional", mathman, 17:05
- Re: Alternative Trigonometry: [Was: Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?], Patricia Shanahan, 16:57
- Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., Juryu, 16:49
- Re: permutation group automorphisms, Jim Heckman, 16:48
- Re: a basic question concerning zeta-function/zeta-zeroes, Gottfried Helms, 16:48
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 16:34
- Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Gottfried Helms, 16:34
- Operator Overloading (Sets and Numbers), Doug Goncz, 16:26
- Re: Three practice algebra qual problems, Robert Israel, 16:00
- Re: Integrals, David C . Ullrich, 15:57
- Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, David C . Ullrich, 15:45
- Re: help inCalculating APR, matt271829-news, 15:39
- [OT] USENETiquette; was: Re: "proportional", Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:22
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Robert Israel, 15:20
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Robert Israel, 15:18
- Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Nameless, 15:13
- Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:07
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, Robert Israel, 15:06
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 14:59
- Re: distance matrix consolidation, Ray Koopman, 14:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 14:51
- Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs, 14:45
- Re: An uncountable countable set, David Hartley, 14:43
- Re: Integrals, Maury Barbato, 14:41
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:38
- Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Karl M. Bunday, 14:35
- Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Phil Carmody, 14:33
- Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Karl M. Bunday, 14:32
- Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Karl M. Bunday, 14:31
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:27
- Re: Integrals, Maury Barbato, 14:26
- Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Robert Israel, 14:17
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:42
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 13:39
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:37
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:35
- A problem related to equidistribution., muyu, 13:34
- Re: A contest problem, Oscar Lanzi III, 13:34
- Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Patrick Coilland, 13:33
- Re: "Help A Disabled Man's Dream Come True", donstockbauer, 13:32
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:32
- Re: Determination of Vertices of a Subspace, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 13:31
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:31
- Re: FORGERY FORGERY FORGERY ALERT!! THERE ARE FORGERS FORGING RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI ON THIS FORUM - I DEMAND THE MODERATORS BAN THE FORGER AND LAUNCH AN INVESTIGATION INTO THESE FORGERIES OF A CHRIST - SHERIFF DANIEL ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION?!!, Lobby Dosser, 13:27
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:20
- Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Proginoskes, 13:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:15
- Re: Determination of Vertices of a Subspace, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 13:13
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 13:12
- Re: help inCalculating APR, matt271829-news, 13:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:01
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 12:59
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 12:54
- Re: A contest problem, 131208, 12:46
- Re: Three practice algebra qual problems, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 12:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:32
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:15
- Re: A contest problem, Patrick Coilland, 12:04
- Determination of Vertices of a Subspace, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
- Re: A contest problem, 131208, 11:59
- Dedanoe quits, dedanoe, 11:54
- Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", bert, 11:54
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben, 11:49
- Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs, 11:30
- Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs, 11:27
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, abe . buckingham, 11:09
- Re: distance matrix consolidation, bird, 11:09
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Sylvain Croussette, 11:04
- MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Nameless, 11:01
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:57
- Re: metric spaces, José Carlos Santos, 10:55
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Jürgen Ren, 10:51
- Re: a basic question concerning zeta-function/zeta-zeroes, Gottfried Helms, 10:49
- Re: Comments?, José Carlos Santos, 10:48
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Oscar Lanzi III, 10:47
- Re: A contest problem, Patrick Coilland, 10:41
- Comments?, rrw050, 10:37
- Re: metric spaces, bill, 10:34
- Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs, 10:20
- Re: Three practice algebra qual problems, Snis Pilbor, 10:16
- [Group Theory] Normal => Characteristic, trivecteur, 10:12
- Re: "Help A Disabled Man's Dream Come True", Justin, 10:08
- Re: A contest problem, ww, 10:03
- Re: An uncountable countable set, David Hartley, 09:59
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Patrick Coilland, 09:57
- Alternative Trigonometry: [Was: Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?], Patricia Shanahan, 09:52
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 09:37
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben, 09:26
- FORGERY FORGERY FORGERY ALERT!! THERE ARE FORGERS FORGING RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI ON THIS FORUM - I DEMAND THE MODERATORS BAN THE FORGER AND LAUNCH AN INVESTIGATION INTO THESE FORGERIES OF A CHRIST - SHERIFF DANIEL ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION?!!, Raymond Karczewski, 09:17
- Re: Wumpus math: Three-coloring a dodecahedron, Oscar Lanzi III, 09:05
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 08:57
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:38
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 08:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 08:32
- Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, David C . Ullrich, 08:27
- A mathematical game - probability questions, Alun, 08:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:25
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David C . Ullrich, 08:21
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, David C . Ullrich, 08:19
- Re: An uncountable countable set, David Hartley, 08:18
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:10
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, G.E. Ivey, 08:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:59
- Re: derivation of relativistic kinetic energy, G.E. Ivey, 07:58
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 07:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:57
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:54
- Re: help inCalculating APR, matt271829-news, 07:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:49
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:47
- Re: help inCalculating APR, matt271829-news, 07:43
- Re: derivation of relativistic kinetic energy, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 07:06
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 07:06
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 06:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 06:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 06:53
- Re: An uncountable countable set, David Hartley, 06:45
- Re: "Help A Disabled Man's Dream Come True", donstockbauer, 06:38
- Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs, 06:31
- a basic question concerning zeta-function/zeta-zeroes, Gottfried Helms, 06:25
- Re: More on combinatorics, matt271829-news, 06:15
- Re: *unique* prime factorizations; the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, Doug Goncz, 06:09
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Jack Campin - bogus address, 06:03
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 05:58
- *unique* prime factorizations; the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, Doug Goncz, 05:53
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, William Elliot, 05:33
- Re: metric spaces, William Elliot, 05:28
- Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs, 05:21
- Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs, 05:19
- Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Robert Israel, 05:12
- Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Robert Israel, 05:12
- Re: JSH: Latest factoring idea is crap, Tim Peters, 05:12
- Re: power series, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 05:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:02
- power series, bill, 04:48
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 04:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 04:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 04:40
- Re: metric spaces, bill, 04:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 04:38
- Re: philosophy of mathematics means a great!, Gottfried Helms, 04:37
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 04:37
- Re: More on combinatorics, Whatever5k, 04:26
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 04:00
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Tim Peters, 03:50
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 03:23
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 03:23
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 03:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george, 03:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 02:56
- Re: distance matrix consolidation, Ray Koopman, 02:36
- Re: Linear algebra txtbk recommendations..., alex . lupas, 02:28
- Re: origin-fixing isometry, William Elliot, 01:56
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Proginoskes, 01:56
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, William Elliot, 01:51
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Bill Taylor, 01:31
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:18
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:06
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:04
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Proginoskes, 01:03
- "Help A Disabled Man's Dream Come True", disabledmanneedshelp, 00:58
- Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 00:52
- Re: "proportional", William Elliot, 00:43
- Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden, 00:42
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, R. Srinivasan, 00:41
- Re: Combinatorics, Proginoskes, 00:34
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, jstevh, 00:07
- Re: distance matrix consolidation, bird, 00:06
July 15, 2006
- Re: JSH: Now what?, Chuck Grempu, 23:57
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, David Moran, 23:49
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, jstevh, 23:42
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, sradhakr, 22:58
- Re: "proportional", Dave L. Renfro, 22:40
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Robert J. Kolker, 22:32
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Chuck Grempu, 22:26
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Chuck Grempu, 22:24
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Chuck Grempu, 22:22
- Re: "proportional", mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:58
- Re: Truncating primes, Jens Kruse Andersen, 21:54
- Re: "proportional", William Elliot, 21:51
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Andrew Bettilyon, 21:49
- Re: "proportional", matt271829-news, 21:29
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Tim Peters, 21:28
- Re: "proportional", William Elliot, 21:08
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:08
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 21:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 21:00
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 20:54
- Re: Combinatorics, matt271829-news, 20:52
- Re: Three practice algebra qual problems, karlfredrickson, 20:46
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Phil Carmody, 20:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 20:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 20:30
- derivation of relativistic kinetic energy, castertroy14, 20:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:11
- Re: distance matrix consolidation, Ray Koopman, 19:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:41
- Linear algebra txtbk recommendations..., Snis Pilbor, 19:40
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 19:40
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 19:36
- Re: Combinatorics, Thomas Mautsch, 19:20
- Three practice algebra qual problems, Snis Pilbor, 19:12
- Re: "proportional", mathman, 18:43
- Re: More on combinatorics, matt271829-news, 18:41
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, jstevh, 18:09
- distance matrix consolidation, bird, 18:01
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, John Jones, 17:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 17:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 17:39
- "proportional", G Patel, 17:37
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, david petry, 17:31
- Re: Pi Is Rational, a.khanm@xxxxxxxxx, 17:25
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 17:24
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 17:16
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 17:16
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 17:00
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Tapio, 16:56
- Re: How rich is dedanoe?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 16:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mike4ty4, 16:53
- Re: help inCalculating APR, Arthur Dent, 16:49
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, david petry, 16:45
- Re: The elliptic function F(cos(theta))-, JEMebius, 16:35
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, Phil Carmody, 16:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown, 16:27
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, Phil Carmody, 16:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, David Hartley, 16:24
- Re: Truncating primes, Christian Siebert, 16:19
- Re: JSH: The gap covers social reality, Arturo Magidin, 16:13
- Re: JSH: The gap covers social reality, Arturo Magidin, 16:10
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george, 16:09
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:57
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:54
- philosophy of mathematics means a great!, salirp, 15:53
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:49
- Re: Question from an old algebraic topology qualifying exam, Lee Rudolph, 15:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 15:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:20
- convergence of probability measures, pkg, 15:15
- Re: Analytic on C - {0}, Lot-o-fun, 15:14
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:06
- Re: Why is e used as natural log, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
- Re: How many different ways of this this equation...., The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, R. Srinivasan, 14:44
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, The World Wide Wade, 14:42
- origin-fixing isometry, Sean McIlroy, 14:39
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, matt271829-news, 14:38
- Re: Tensor product and coproduct in rings, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 14:31
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, T.H. Ray, 14:27
- Re: The three times table, gwh, 14:21
- Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is, gwh, 14:13
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Peter Webb, 14:11
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Peter Webb, 14:07
- Re: All Mathematics is Flawed, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- The Riemann Hypothesis Revisited, Ivan Iliev, 13:59
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Patricia Shanahan, 13:42
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Patricia Shanahan, 13:41
- Re: help inCalculating APR, matt271829-news, 13:40
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:21
- Re: Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad, 13:12
- Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, bert, 13:11
- Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, Yecloud, 13:09
- Re: help inCalculating APR, Barry Schwarz, 13:01
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 13:01
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 13:00
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:59
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, stephen, 12:58
- Re: Analytic function on open disk, David C . Ullrich, 12:46
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Barry Schwarz, 12:46
- Re: Analytic on C - {0}, David C . Ullrich, 12:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:43
- Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, David C . Ullrich, 12:41
- Reductions within P [complexity], ahuznot, 12:38
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Daryl McCullough, 12:29
- Re: Tensor product and coproduct in rings, Jose Capco, 12:28
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 12:24
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Rock Brentwood, 12:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David C . Ullrich, 12:21
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, David C . Ullrich, 12:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Daryl McCullough, 12:18
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:15
- Re: Simplifying Algebraic expression, Jeffrey Spoon, 12:12
- Re: Analytic function on open disk, A N Niel, 12:04
- Re: Analytic function on open disk, eugene, 11:57
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:56
- Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, Yecloud, 11:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:49
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben, 11:44
- The elliptic function F(cos(theta)), John Schutkeker, 11:44
- More on combinatorics, Whatever5k, 11:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 11:24
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Jiri Lebl, 11:21
- Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, Randy Poe, 11:13
- Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, Randy Poe, 11:10
- Re: Help! thesis about singaporean math, clau, 10:58
- Re: calculte probility, Arthur Dent, 10:54
- Analytic function on open disk, James, 10:49
- Re: help inCalculating APR, Arthur Dent, 10:31
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 10:28
- Analytic on C - {0}, James, 10:04
- Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, Yecloud, 10:00
- Re: A contest problem, Patrick Coilland, 09:58
- A contest problem, 131208, 09:36
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Dave Seaman, 09:00
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Patricia Shanahan, 08:58
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Thomas Mautsch, 08:28
- help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs, 08:18
- Re: Tensor product and coproduct in rings, Lee Rudolph, 08:16
- Re: Tensor product and coproduct in rings, Hans Aberg, 07:59
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, Phil Carmody, 07:56
- Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Tom, 07:52
- Re: gcd, lcm, and notation for same, Doug Goncz, 07:49
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Phil Carmody, 07:42
- Re: Bond Mathematics: Calculating YTM, duration, and convexity, John, 07:33
- Tensor product and coproduct in rings, Jose Capco, 07:33
- Re: Golay codes-, JEMebius, 07:32
- Re: Dirac delta with complex argument, Hans Aberg, 07:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lee Rudolph, 07:22
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Christian Siebert, 07:15
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, R. Srinivasan, 06:55
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Richard Henry, 06:16
- How rich is dedanoe?, dedanoe, 06:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Richard Henry, 06:04
- Re: metric spaces, William Elliot, 06:02
- Re: Rank of a matrix with bounded elements, eugene, 05:54
- Re: continuity&metric spaces, José Carlos Santos, 05:46
- Finite cyclic semigroups, David, 05:37
- Re: metric spaces, William Elliot, 05:17
- Re: continuity&metric spaces, William Elliot, 05:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Kevin Karn, 05:10
- Re: Why is e used as natural log, Fermat, 04:46
- Re: Rank of a matrix with bounded elements, Simple, 04:29
- Re: Rank of a matrix with bounded elements, Simple, 04:29
- Re: metric spaces, Simple, 04:22
- metric spaces, bill, 03:47
- Rank of a matrix with bounded elements, eugene, 03:46
- continuity&metric spaces, bill, 03:44
- span of matrices, karlfredrickson, 03:38
- Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Tim Peters, 03:02
- Re: permutation group automorphisms, Jim Heckman, 02:51
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:33
- Re: Why is e used as natural log, José Carlos Santos, 02:32
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 02:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:18
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Rajnish Kumar, 02:17
- Re: platonic solids, Jim Heckman, 01:59
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, R. Srinivasan, 01:57
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Barb Knox, 01:37
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 01:28
- Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 01:23
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, N. Silver, 01:21
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 01:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:55
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:54
- Why is e used as natural log, Rajnish Kumar, 00:48
- Re: JSH: The gap covers social reality, Proginoskes, 00:48
- Re: JSH: The gap covers social reality, Proginoskes, 00:44
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Proginoskes, 00:39
- Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, William Elliot, 00:37
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, imaginatorium, 00:35
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 00:34
- Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, Proginoskes, 00:27
- Re: Wumpus math: Three-coloring a dodecahedron, Proginoskes, 00:23
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 00:20
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, george, 00:14
- Re: Bunch of actors, Abstract Dissonance, 00:13
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 00:13
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 00:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Dave L. Renfro, 00:08
- Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Virgil, 00:05
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 00:00
July 14, 2006
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:56
- Re: platonic solids, Proginoskes, 23:54
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 23:48
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:38
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:37
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Kevin Karn, 23:37
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:36
- Re: gcd, lcm, and notation for same, Tim Peters, 23:35
- Re: Combinatorics, Proginoskes, 23:31
- Re: Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, elcaminodelbudainterior, 23:30
- Re: Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, elcaminodelbudainterior, 23:30
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, imaginatorium, 23:30
- Re: JSH: The gap covers social reality, Arturo Magidin, 23:25
- Re: JSH: The gap covers social reality, Proginoskes, 23:17
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, mike4ty4, 23:15
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 23:11
- Re: gcd, lcm, and notation for same, Doug Goncz, 22:55
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:52
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:48
- Re: Sets with redundant elements and UPF, Doug Goncz, 22:48
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:44
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:44
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:40
- gcd, lcm, and notation for same, Doug Goncz, 22:35
- Re: JSH: The gap covers social reality, David Moran, 22:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:25
- Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Doug Goncz, 22:07
- Re: Bunch of actors, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 22:03
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 22:01
- Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 21:59
- Re: JSH: The gap covers social reality, jstevh, 21:55
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, R. Srinivasan, 21:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Kevin Karn, 21:43
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 21:34
- Re: calculte probility, matt271829-news, 21:30
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, Gib Bogle, 21:22
- Re: Iterative solution to non-linear equations, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:05
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 21:04
- Re: JSH: The gap covers social reality, David Moran, 21:03
- Re: Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, fishfry, 21:02
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:57
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Dann Corbit, 20:45
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, sttscitrans, 20:31
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:27
- Re: calculte probility, Bopar, 20:24
- Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, matt271829-news, 20:23
- Re: JSH: The gap covers social reality, jstevh, 20:18
- Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Eighty, 20:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:13
- Re: analysis with uniform convergence.., mina_world, 20:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:03
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:48
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:44
- Bond Mathematics: Calculating YTM, duration, and convexity, Protoman, 19:42
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 19:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:34
- Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Robert Israel, 19:28
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 19:27
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 19:16
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:15
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Ralf Bader, 19:11
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 19:10
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:10
- Re: conversion btn Weierstrass and Jacobi elliptic function, Badger, 19:06
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Tim Peters, 19:01
- Re: Bunch of actors, cbrown, 18:55
- Re: calculte probility, matt271829-news, 18:54
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 18:48
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Phil Carmody, 18:39
- Re: The three times table, Phil Carmody, 18:39
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 18:35
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Nathan, 18:35
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:30
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, donstockbauer, 18:27
- Re: Is there anything God can Dedanoe cannot?, T Wake, 18:25
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, donstockbauer, 18:23
- Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Eighty, 18:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Barb Knox, 18:21
- Re: Bunch of actors, Gib Bogle, 18:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:18
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Phil Carmody, 18:17
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown, 18:15
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:12
- Re: Iterative solution to non-linear equations, Jim Rockford, 18:08
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:07
- Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Dan, 18:06
- Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, Abstract Dissonance, 18:04
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 18:03
- Re: Help! thesis about singaporean math, Dave L. Renfro, 18:03
- Re: Bunch of actors, Abstract Dissonance, 18:01
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:01
- Re: Bunch of actors, Abstract Dissonance, 18:00
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Barb Knox, 17:58
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 17:53
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Dave L. Renfro, 17:52
- calculte probility, Bopar, 17:50
- Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Tim Peters, 17:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 17:47
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, The World Wide Wade, 17:46
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, draccarlawpet, 17:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 17:44
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:41
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 17:41
- Re: L^p question, The World Wide Wade, 17:41
- Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, Abstract Dissonance, 17:41
- Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Dan, 17:34
- Re: Is there anything God can Dedanoe cannot?, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:34
- Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, Gene Ward Smith, 17:33
- Re: Welcome to DEDANOEs VAGINA INSPECT CENTRE!!!, Phineas T Puddleduck, 17:32
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 17:30
- Re: What are the classics?, Robert Israel, 17:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 17:26
- Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, mathman, 17:25
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Tapio, 17:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 17:18
- Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Robert Israel, 17:14
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Tim Peters, 17:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:12
- Re: Argumentum ad hominem, Gene Ward Smith, 17:06
- Argumentum ad hominem, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 17:00
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 16:51
- Re: Squares, Gerry, 16:48
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 16:47
- Re: test, bill, 16:47
- Re: quasiconvex functions, John, 16:46
- test, bill, 16:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:39
- Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, A N Niel, 16:39
- Re: What are the classics?, Gene Ward Smith, 16:37
- Re: Squares, Gerry, 16:37
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:31
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, sttscitrans, 16:18
- Wumpus math: Three-coloring a dodecahedron, Arthur J. O'Dwyer, 16:18
- Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, Felix Rawlings, 16:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, stephen, 16:08
- Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, stush, 16:04
- Re: Sets with redundant elements and UPF, Robert Israel, 16:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:00
- (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Doug Goncz, 15:57
- Re: Help! thesis about singaporean math, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:55
- Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Robert Israel, 15:55
- (humor) Another hand-waving incredibly simple proof of FLT, Doug Goncz, 15:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:48
- Perpetuum Dedanoe, dedanoe, 15:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:43
- Welcome to DEDANOEs VAGINA INSPECT CENTRE!!!, dedanoe, 15:43
- Is there anything God can Dedanoe cannot?, dedanoe, 15:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:35
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:30
- Re: Iterative solution to non-linear equations, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:30
- Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 15:28
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:26
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:24
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Robert Israel, 15:20
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:19
- Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, stush, 15:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:10
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 15:07
- Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, Dann Corbit, 15:07
- Re: Iterative solution to non-linear equations, laniik, 15:01
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:59
- Re: Question about modular function related to the projective line, David Sevilla, 14:57
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 14:56
- Re: Iterative solution to non-linear equations, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 14:53
- Re: Possible to estimate a unknown barrier from only one realization of time series?, Herman Rubin, 14:52
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown, 14:52
- Iterative solution to non-linear equations, laniik, 14:38
- Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, stush, 14:35
- Re: Possible to estimate a unknown barrier from only one realization of time series?, dave, 14:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 14:30
- Re: Possible to estimate a unknown barrier from only one realization of time series?, Lucy, 14:20
- Re: What are the classics?, sunrise, 14:08
- Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script ), 14:03
- thesis about singapore math, clau, 13:54
- Re: permutation group automorphisms, Arturo Magidin, 13:54
- Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Tom, 13:51
- Re: What are the classics?, bert, 13:51
- Re: Military logistic problem, trooperwt, 13:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Patricia Shanahan, 13:50
- Re: Truncating primes, Jens Kruse Andersen, 13:49
- Re: Possible to estimate a unknown barrier from only one realization of time series?, Lucy, 13:49
- Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, stush, 13:46
- Re: What are the classics?, sunrise, 13:40
- Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, elcaminodelbudainterior, 13:39
- Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, elcaminodelbudainterior, 13:30
- Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, elcaminodelbudainterior, 13:28
- Re: Squares, Phil Carmody, 13:24
- Golay codes, PaulHjelmstad, 13:23
- Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:21
- Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Robert Israel, 13:21
- Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, martin cohen, 13:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 13:19
- thesis about singapore math, clau, 13:15
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george, 13:13
- Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, bert, 13:13
- Re: permutation group automorphisms, joseph rivers, 13:10
- Re: Question from an old algebraic topology qualifying exam, melanie, 13:04
- Re: Help! thesis about singaporean math, José Carlos Santos, 12:58
- Re: analysis with uniform convergence.., José Carlos Santos, 12:52
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Peter Webb, 12:50
- Inverses in Geometric Algebra, Rob Arthan, 12:47
- Re: platonic solids, Michael Stemper, 12:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:44
- Re: What are the classics?, amzoti, 12:39
- Re: Help! thesis about singaporean math, clau, 12:31
- Ten all-time most influential math books, Dave L. Renfro, 12:23
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 12:21
- Re: Bunch of actors, gwh, 12:17
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:15
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Phil Carmody, 12:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:04
- Re: L^p question, Jules, 12:04
- Re: Squares, Robert Israel, 11:52
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, tactics, 11:49
- Re: I own the cybernetics corp now., plasticsunrise, 11:39
- Re: quasiconvex functions, Robert Israel, 11:39
- Re: Groups: Even/Odd Permutations, Chris Smith, 11:37
- Re: Numerical differentiation formulas?, Rouben Rostamian, 11:36
- Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:29
- Re: Military logistic problem, Paul A. Rubin, 11:29
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Michael Orion, 11:29
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:25
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Jiri Lebl, 11:25
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:23
- Re: How to write a normalisation depending on the domain of a function, csimon, 11:19
- Re: Need an algorithm, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:17
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, guenther vonKnakspot, 11:15
- Re: Help! thesis about singaporean math, José Carlos Santos, 11:14
- Re: Need an algorithm, Chip Eastham, 11:13
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Richard Henry, 11:06
- Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71, 11:06
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 11:00
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Nathan, 10:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Peter Webb, 10:56
- Re: Possible to estimate a unknown barrier from only one realization of time series?, Herman Rubin, 10:54
- Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, James Waldby, 10:54
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george, 10:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 10:46
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:44
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:44
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george, 10:41
- Re: Need an algorithm, Dave, 10:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:32
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george, 10:31
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george, 10:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Peter Webb, 10:28
- Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script ), 10:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should NW behave?, george, 10:24
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Daryl McCullough, 10:22
- Help! thesis about singaporean math, clau, 10:20
- Re: L^p question, Dave L. Renfro, 10:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 10:11
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:35
- Re: Squares, Gerry, 09:31
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:24
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:22
- Re: analysis with uniform convergence.., mina_world, 09:19
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:19
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:10
- Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, bert, 09:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:03
- Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Dan, 08:55
- Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Pubkeybreaker, 08:54
- What are the classics?, plasticsunrise, 08:45
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), matt271829-news, 08:44
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Robert J. Kolker, 08:42
- Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, Robert J. Kolker, 08:40
- Sets with redundant elements and UPF, Doug Goncz, 08:20
- L^p question, James, 08:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David C . Ullrich, 08:11
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David C . Ullrich, 08:09
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David C . Ullrich, 08:07
- Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, Narasimham, 08:06
- Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, Abstract Dissonance, 08:06
- Re: Absorbing sets, David C . Ullrich, 08:03
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, David C . Ullrich, 08:01
- Probability to find a substring in a string, Eighty, 08:01
- Re: Military logistic problem, christriddle, 08:00
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?-, JEMebius, 08:00
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 07:58
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Narasimham, 07:50
- Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, Pubkeybreaker, 07:46
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, imaginatorium, 07:43
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Han de Bruijn, 07:31
- Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, The Last Danish Pastry, 07:30
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, G.E. Ivey, 07:25
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Han de Bruijn, 07:22
- Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, stush, 07:22
- Re: question regarding a series, The Last Danish Pastry, 07:20
- Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script ), 07:20
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Larry Lard, 07:09
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, stush, 07:08
- Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, The Last Danish Pastry, 07:06
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, David C . Ullrich, 07:03
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 07:00
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, sttscitrans, 06:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David C . Ullrich, 06:46
- Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, donstockbauer, 06:43
- Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, The Last Danish Pastry, 06:42
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lee Rudolph, 06:25
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, T.H. Ray, 06:19
- Re: question regarding a series, José Carlos Santos, 06:17
- Re: analysis with uniform convergence.., José Carlos Santos, 06:15
- Re: Possible to estimate a unknown barrier from only one realization of time series?, dave, 06:15
- Combinatorics, Whatever5k, 06:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lee Rudolph, 06:13
- Re: Sets of divisors, sizes, complements, unions, intersections, bert, 06:12
- question regarding a series, Whatever5k, 06:11
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, J. B. Kennedy, 06:11
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 06:10
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:00
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 05:59
- Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Dhandapani, 05:45
- The James Harris Tribute Page, Abstract Dissonance, 05:41
- Re: Truncating primes, Christian Siebert, 05:19
- Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Rod, 05:19
- Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Christian Siebert, 05:10
- Re: Truncating primes, The Last Danish Pastry, 05:06
- Re: The three times table, Rajnish Kumar, 05:05
- Divisibility rule for 7, Rajnish Kumar, 05:04
- The three times table, The Last Danish Pastry, 05:01
- why is 11 not oneteen?, Rajnish Kumar, 04:58
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, guenther vonKnakspot, 04:58
- Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, Rajnish Kumar, 04:52
- Re: Truncating primes, Rajnish Kumar, 04:51
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 04:42
- Re: Need an algorithm, The Last Danish Pastry, 04:37
- Re: FLTMA Redux, Roman B. Binder, 04:31
- Re: Truncating primes, Christian Siebert, 04:29
- analysis with uniform convergence.., mina_world, 04:26
- Re: Absorbing sets, José Carlos Santos, 04:23
- Re: Integral of the intersection of two Gaussians, Han de Bruijn, 04:14
- Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Narcoleptic Insomniac, 04:05
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Han de Bruijn, 04:04
- Re: JSH: Another possibility, Mike Kelly, 04:02
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:54
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Soap_Dude, 03:51
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:46
- Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Dan, 03:46
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:41
- Truncating primes, Rajnish Kumar, 03:36
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, abo, 03:35
- Re: quasiconvex functions, John, 03:35
- Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Dan, 03:33
- Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Achilleas D Palamiotis, 03:19
- Re: Groups: Even/Odd Permutations, Chris Smith, 03:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, guenther vonKnakspot, 03:10
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 03:08
- Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script ), 02:55
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 02:52
- conversion btn Weierstrass and Jacobi elliptic function, mathlover, 02:40
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, R. Srinivasan, 02:34
- Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Narcoleptic Insomniac, 02:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, R. Srinivasan, 02:27
- Re: JSH: Another possibility, Bob Terwilliger, 02:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 02:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Peter Webb, 02:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Rupert, 02:19
- Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Narcoleptic Insomniac, 02:11
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 02:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 01:57
- Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Narcoleptic Insomniac, 01:57
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Abstract Dissonance, 01:51
- Re: The gap covers social reality, Abstract Dissonance, 01:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 01:49
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, abo, 01:47
- Re: Groups: Even/Odd Permutations, Arturo Magidin, 01:45
- Re: permutation group automorphisms, Arturo Magidin, 01:43
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), James Dow Allen, 01:25
- Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Dan, 01:20
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Proginoskes, 01:19
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Proginoskes, 01:14
- Re: Groups: Even/Odd Permutations, Virgil, 01:11
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Proginoskes, 01:11
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Proginoskes, 01:09
- Re: JSH: My working theory on the psychology, Proginoskes, 01:05
- Re: Regarding the stock markets, Earle Jones, 00:57
- JSH: Another possibility, jstevh, 00:56
- Re: Prine Number thought experiment, Proginoskes, 00:54
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, jstevh, 00:45
- Re: permutation group automorphisms, mskirvin, 00:44
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:41
- Re: JSH: The gap covers social reality, mensanator@xxxxxxx, 00:40
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 00:39
- JSH: The gap covers social reality, jstevh, 00:35
- Re: permutation group automorphisms, mskirvin, 00:35
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Proginoskes, 00:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 00:10
- Re: Squares, Gerry, 00:05
- Groups: Even/Odd Permutations, Chris Smith, 00:02
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 00:01
July 13, 2006
- permutation group automorphisms, joseph rivers, 23:56
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, jshsucks, 23:56
- Re: JSH: My working theory on the psychology, Gib Bogle, 23:40
- Re: Sets of divisors, sizes, complements, unions, intersections, Gottfried Helms, 23:36
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, jstevh, 23:32
- Prine Number thought experiment, robert.w.adams@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:31
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:44
- Re: My working theory on the psychology, Chuck Grempu, 22:41
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 22:39
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 22:35
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:32
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Tim Peters, 22:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 22:29
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:23
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 22:21
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 22:19
- Re: Another Galois theory problem, jmilne, 22:19
- Need an algorithm, Dave, 22:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:11
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 22:10
- Re: Integral of the intersection of two Gaussians, Robert Israel, 22:08
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Dann Corbit, 22:05
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 22:03
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 21:56
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:55
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:53
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 21:52
- Re: JSH: My working theory on the psychology, jshsucks, 21:51
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:46
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 21:46
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, mike4ty4, 21:42
- Re: Sudoku question, Gib Bogle, 21:40
- Re: JSH: My working theory on the psychology, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:39
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, jshsucks, 21:37
- Re: Convergence of series, Robert Israel, 21:37
- JSH: My working theory on the psychology, jstevh, 21:32
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, jstevh, 21:24
- Re: Another Galois theory problem, Jim Heckman, 21:23
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, jstevh, 21:22
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Gib Bogle, 21:20
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:11
- Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Dave L. Renfro, 20:58
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 20:55
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, mike4ty4, 20:54
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Kevin Karn, 20:54
- ? matrix with function entries, Cheng Cosine, 20:54
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, mike4ty4, 20:53
- Re: Maximal dimension + subspace of invertible matrices, Robert Israel, 20:52
- Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, mike4ty4, 20:50
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 20:47
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 20:47
- Re: Way too interesting, jstevh, 20:37
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, jstevh, 20:33
- Re: Sets of divisors, sizes, complements, unions, intersections, Doug Goncz, 20:24
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 20:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 20:13
- Re: Squares, Robert Israel, 20:13
- Integral of the intersection of two Gaussians, brainslaugh, 20:13
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown, 20:10
- Re: Question about modular function related to the projective line, Gerry Myerson, 20:09
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick, 20:02
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 19:59
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 19:57
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 19:54
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 19:52
- Re: platonic solids, Proginoskes, 19:49
- Re: how to rotate a multivariate Gaussian, brainslaugh, 19:47
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Proginoskes, 19:45
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Proginoskes, 19:42
- Re: Questions inspired by reading Apollonius of Perga on Conic Sections, Ken Pledger, 19:42
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, litsohate, 19:37
- Re: platonic solids, Sean McIlroy, 19:37
- Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, Proginoskes, 19:37
- Re: Questions inspired by reading Apollonius of Perga on Conic Sections, Ken Pledger, 19:33
- Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Gerry Myerson, 19:18
- Re: Possible to estimate a unknown barrier from only one realization of time series?, Lucy, 19:15
- Re: Maximal dimension + subspace of invertible matrices, Gerry Myerson, 19:10
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 19:03
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 18:58
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, david petry, 18:51
- Re: Sets of divisors, sizes, complements, unions, intersections, Doug Goncz, 18:41
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Russell Easterly, 18:39
- Re: Questions inspired by reading Apollonius of Perga on Conic Sections, Ken Pledger, 18:28
- Signal Nonlocality in Curved Hilbert Space, Jack Sarfatti, 18:27
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 18:25
- Re: The White Box, fishfry, 18:19
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 18:10
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 18:08
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:07
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, david petry, 18:00
- Re: Sets of divisors, sizes, complements, unions, intersections, Tim Peters, 17:58
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Chuck Grempu, 17:35
- Re: Convergence of series, Gene Ward Smith, 17:31
- Re: Squares, Gerry, 17:29
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 17:17
- Re: How to write a normalisation depending on the domain of a function, matt271829-news, 17:13
- Re: Maximal dimension + subspace of invertible matrices, Chip Eastham, 17:12
- Re: Squares, Robert Israel, 17:11
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Gib Bogle, 16:52
- Re: quasiconvex functions, Robert Israel, 16:45
- Sets of divisors, sizes, complements, unions, intersections, Doug Goncz, 16:44
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:37
- Re: Squares, Gerry, 16:37
- Convergence of series, David Sevilla, 16:34
- Re: quasiconvex functions, John, 16:26
- Re: Absorbing sets, Robert Israel, 16:08
- Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71, 16:05
- Maximal dimension + subspace of invertible matrices, eugene, 16:04
- Re: A=B*C how to get B?, meris300, 16:02
- Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71, 15:57
- Re: my current problmee, Robert Israel, 15:55
- Re: Squares, Lathaea, 15:54
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:51
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, imaginatorium, 15:50
- Squares, Gerry, 15:50
- Re: precedence of negation and times, Virgil, 15:45
- Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Dave L. Renfro, 15:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:40
- Re: quasiconvex functions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:38
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:35
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:32
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:31
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:30
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:27
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:24
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:21
- Re: Probability question - please help!, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:17
- Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Robert Israel, 15:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:16
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:16
- Re: Period of random number generators, Doug Goncz, 15:04
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:59
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Robert Israel, 14:56
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:55
- Re: distance between sets, Dave L. Renfro, 14:53
- Re: Question from an old algebraic topology qualifying exam, Lee Rudolph, 14:51
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:49
- Re: Period of random number generators, Chip Eastham, 14:47
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 14:44
- Re: Factoring c-1, Tim Peters, 14:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:39
- Re: Factoring c-1, stush, 14:32
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, David R Tribble, 14:22
- Re: Period of random number generators, Doug Goncz, 14:21
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 14:20
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Jiri Lebl, 14:17
- Re: distance between sets, step_y, 14:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Dave L. Renfro, 14:05
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 14:03
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, george, 14:01
- Re: Factoring c-1, bert, 13:58
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 13:57
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:57
- Re: Period of random number generators, Chip Eastham, 13:54
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, DontBother, 13:53
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Nathan, 13:52
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 13:52
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, george, 13:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 13:49
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:48
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Chuck Grempu, 13:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:45
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, george, 13:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, stephen, 13:41
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 13:41
- Factoring c-1, Doug Goncz, 13:40
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 13:33
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 13:27
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Michael Stemper, 13:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, lDontBother, 13:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george, 13:21
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 13:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 13:18
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, lDontBother, 13:15
- Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71, 13:12
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, David Taylor, 13:00
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Aatu Koskensilta, 13:00
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:59
- Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Tom, 12:54
- Re: Military logistic problem, Randy Poe, 12:52
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, bert, 12:48
- distance between sets, diegotorquemada, 12:47
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, lesterzick, 12:42
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Aatu Koskensilta, 12:34
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, kunzmilan, 12:32
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:30
- How to write a normalisation depending on the domain of a function, csimon, 12:30
- Re: Another Galois theory problem, Arturo Magidin, 12:28
- Re: Another Galois theory problem, Arturo Magidin, 12:24
- Re: Question from an old algebraic topology qualifying exam, melanie, 12:22
- DFT of a Gaussian, csimon, 12:21
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, bert, 12:15
- Re: Probability question - please help!, James Waldby, 12:10
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Aatu Koskensilta, 11:52
- Full body massages for stress and muscle tension relief. Cleveland Ohio (Serious), massotherapybyrob, 11:51
- Re: Question about modular function related to the projective line, David Sevilla, 11:49
- Re: Military logistic problem, Paul A. Rubin, 11:48
- Re: A=B*C how to get B?, Randy Poe, 11:46
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lee Rudolph, 11:44
- Re: Absorbing sets, José Carlos Santos, 11:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, guenther vonKnakspot, 11:39
- Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71, 11:38
- Set Theory: Should you believe?, Norman Wildberger, 11:37
- Re: A=B*C how to get B?, Toni Lassila, 11:32
- Re: Military logistic problem, Keith A. Lewis, 11:31
- Re: Military logistic problem, christriddle, 11:30
- Military logistic problem, christriddle, 11:27
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, amzoti, 11:25
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:24
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 11:23
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:18
- Re: platonic solids, A N Niel, 11:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 11:15
- A=B*C how to get B?, meris300, 11:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 11:13
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, kunzmilan, 11:06
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, stephen, 11:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 11:02
- Re: Period of random number generators, Doug Goncz, 10:51
- Re: platonic solids, José Carlos Santos, 10:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Robert J. Kolker, 10:43
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Dave L. Renfro, 10:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:31
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:29
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, guenther vonKnakspot, 10:29
- platonic solids, Sean McIlroy, 10:26
- Re: Probability question - please help!, Randy Poe, 10:06
- Re: Integrals, Maury Barbato, 09:50
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Maury Barbato, 09:48
- Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71, 09:35
- Re: An uncountable countable set, David Hartley, 09:35
- Re: Period of random number generators, Chip Eastham, 09:34
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Randy Poe, 09:31
- Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71, 09:31
- Re: Bunch of actors, Michael Stemper, 09:29
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Newberry, 09:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Richard Herring, 09:11
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:00
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, willo_thewisp, 08:59
- Re: Absorbing sets, G. A. Edgar, 08:56
- quasiconvex functions, John, 08:46
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, matt271829-news, 08:36
- Re: precedence of negation and times, A N Niel, 08:34
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 08:19
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 08:12
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Aatu Koskensilta, 08:05
- Re: Properties of weakly continuous maps in a Hilbert space, Dave Seaman, 07:57
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, fernando revilla, 07:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:49
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:45
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:43
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), matt271829-news, 07:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:41
- Re: Let An Intellectual Visionary Save England : Turing Numbers German Machine., Ed Murphy, 07:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:39
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:35
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:31
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, guenther vonKnakspot, 07:22
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Tez, 07:18
- Newton's formula, kunzmilan, 07:12
- Re: Question from an old algebraic topology qualifying exam, Lee Rudolph, 07:07
- Re: Is {} and element of all sets?, Doug Goncz, 07:06
- Re: Absorbing sets, donstockbauer, 07:05
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:03
- Re: Hard analysis problem (epsilon deltas), David C . Ullrich, 06:58
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:55
- Re: Clifford Numbers in Mathcad, Doug Goncz, 06:54
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Mike Kelly, 06:53
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:48
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:42
- Re: Even and Odd Problem, Doug Goncz, 06:41
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, David C . Ullrich, 06:41
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, David C . Ullrich, 06:35
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, matt271829-news, 06:35
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 06:33
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:30
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:29
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, David C . Ullrich, 06:25
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:20
- Re: Properties of weakly continuous maps in a Hilbert space, David C . Ullrich, 06:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:16
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Daryl McCullough, 06:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:03
- Absorbing sets, José Carlos Santos, 06:03
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, kunzmilan, 05:59
- Re: Period of random number generators, Doug Goncz, 05:59
- Re: Product of matrices of zero trace, eugene, 05:53
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David C . Ullrich, 05:51
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Peter Webb, 05:46
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Larry Lard, 05:40
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Abstract Dissonance, 05:27
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, R. Srinivasan, 05:26
- Re: Quadratic eigenvalue problem, rjfmv, 05:14
- Re: trajectory of a wire wound on a cylinder, Narasimham, 05:04
- Re: Quadratic eigenvalue problem, rjfmv, 05:02
- Military logistic problem, christriddle, 04:50
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Peter Webb, 04:42
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 04:42
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 04:40
- Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Fermat, 04:38
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 04:37
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 04:35
- Re: how to rotate a multivariate Gaussian, Han de Bruijn, 04:34
- Re: Dirac delta with complex argument, Volker Boie, 04:28
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 04:01
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Kevin Karn, 03:58
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 03:48
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Tim Peters, 03:41
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:25
- Re: Affine spaces as posets, William Elliot, 03:22
- Re: how to rotate a multivariate Gaussian, Ray Koopman, 03:21
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 03:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 03:18
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Russell Easterly, 03:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 03:13
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Gib Bogle, 03:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 03:07
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 03:06
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 02:49
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, guenther vonKnakspot, 02:43
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 02:34
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:30
- A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, Achilleas D Palamiotis, 02:14
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:11
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 02:04
- Re: B(x) = 2^-x + B(4x/3) + B((2x-1)/3) + B(4x+2), James Dow Allen, 01:59
- my current problmee, Clamb, 01:59
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Proginoskes, 01:53
- Re: Way too interesting, Proginoskes, 01:51
- how to rotate a multivariate Gaussian, brainslaugh, 01:44
- Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Proginoskes, 01:38
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:36
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:32
- Re: Surprised even me, Chuck Grempu, 01:24
- Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, Proginoskes, 01:23
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Proginoskes, 01:21
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Chuck Grempu, 01:21
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Proginoskes, 01:12
- Re: Dirac delta with complex argument, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 01:04
- Re: A question on Spec Z[x], mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 00:53
- Re: Let An Intellectual Visionary Save England : Turing Numbers German Machine., don . lotto, 00:51
- Re: The gcd of a set A, and of P, the set of primes, Tim Peters, 00:43
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Chuck Grempu, 00:30
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, Chuck Grempu, 00:24
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Chuck Grempu, 00:21
- Re: Probability question - please help!, James Waldby, 00:19
- Re: Even and Odd Problem, Gerry Myerson, 00:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson, 00:02
July 12, 2006
- Re: Period of random number generators, Chip Eastham, 23:52
- A question on Spec Z[x], canadan, 23:48
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Jonathan Hoyle, 23:40
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil, 23:37
- Re: Period of random number generators, Gerry Myerson, 23:31
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Abstract Dissonance, 23:31
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Gene Ward Smith, 23:26
- Dirac delta with complex argument, vv, 23:19
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, lesterzick, 23:15
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 23:14
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 23:07
- Re: What happened to the Wolfram site?, Ronald Bruck, 22:55
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, david petry, 22:54
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, david petry, 22:43
- Re: Properties of weakly continuous maps in a Hilbert space, Jim Burns, 22:42
- Re: Properties of weakly continuous maps in a Hilbert space, Jim Burns, 22:42
- Re: Odd Squares, 8 (2^3), and the Sum of the First n Positive Integers, Gottfried Helms, 22:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 22:29
- Re: What happened to the Wolfram site?, david petry, 22:16
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith, 22:16
- Re: Even and Odd Problem, Virgil, 22:12
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Peter Webb, 22:11
- Re: Prime numbers, Jens Kruse Andersen, 22:09
- Hard analysis problem (epsilon deltas), Snis Pilbor, 22:07
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Dik T. Winter, 22:07
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Virgil, 22:06
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 22:04
- Re: Grundzüge der Mathematik: V1 Translation Error?, Dik T. Winter, 22:03
- Re: Clifford Numbers in Mathcad, Gene Ward Smith, 22:00
- Odd Squares, 8 (2^3), and the Sum of the First n Positive Integers, rer, 21:58
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, willo_thewisp, 21:54
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Dik T. Winter, 21:53
- Period of random number generators, Doug Goncz, 21:48
- Re: Way too interesting, David Moran, 21:46
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, jstevh, 21:45
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, Abstract Dissonance, 21:45
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gonçalo Rodrigues, 21:43
- Re: So how can they lie about math?, David Moran, 21:42
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, david petry, 21:42
- Re: Way too interesting, jstevh, 21:41
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, jstevh, 21:39
- Re: Way too interesting, David Moran, 21:39
- Question from an old algebraic topology qualifying exam, melanie, 21:38
- Re: JSH: So how can they lie about math?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:38
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Dik T. Winter, 21:37
- Re: Even and Odd Problem, Doug Goncz, 21:37
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ken Pledger, 21:33
- Re: JSH: Way too interesting, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:32
- JSH: So how can they lie about math?, jstevh, 21:32
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 21:28
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Gene Ward Smith, 21:22
- Re: order of a number mod p ?, Tim Peters, 21:21
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Gerry Myerson, 21:18
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Jiri Lebl, 21:16
- JSH: Way too interesting, jstevh, 21:15
- Re: Prime numbers, Phil Carmody, 21:14
- Re: Prime numbers, Phil Carmody, 21:11
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, david petry, 21:09
- Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71, 21:08
- Re: Prime numbers, Phil Carmody, 21:07
- Re: Even and Odd Problem, Robert Israel, 21:04
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, david petry, 21:02
- Re: Product of matrices of zero trace, Robert Israel, 21:00
- Re: Product of matrices of zero trace, Lee Rudolph, 21:00
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:54
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:52
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Gerry Myerson, 20:50
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 20:49
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:45
- Re: What happened to the Wolfram site?, William Elliot, 20:42
- Re: Name of chapter dependency diagrams sought, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 20:33
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, William Elliot, 20:29
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Gerry Myerson, 20:22
- Re: Prime numbers, Tim Peters, 20:20
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 20:13
- Re: Another Galois theory problem, Doug B, 20:12
- Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Ken Pledger, 20:05
- Re: Another Galois theory problem, Doug B, 19:53
- Re: Question about modular function related to the projective line, Gerry Myerson, 19:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:50
- Re: Even and Odd Problem, Doug Goncz, 19:43
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Gib Bogle, 19:37
- Re: Clifford Numbers in Mathcad, Doug Goncz, 19:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:18
- Re: Pi Is Rational, Ronald Bruck, 19:15
- Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, malbrain, 18:56
- Re: Name of chapter dependency diagrams sought, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:48
- Re: Prime numbers, Ioannis, 18:46
- What happened to the Wolfram site?, amzoti, 18:43
- Name of chapter dependency diagrams sought, google03, 18:35
- Re: Prime numbers, Dave L. Renfro, 18:35
- Re: Prime numbers, amzoti, 18:34
- Question about modular function related to the projective line, David Sevilla, 17:57
- Re: Prime numbers, Phil Carmody, 17:48
- Re: Prime numbers, Phil Carmody, 17:46
- Product of matrices of zero trace, eugene, 17:40
- Re: Probability question - please help!, imbibe, 17:33
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, stush, 17:19
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:14
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 17:09
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:09
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 17:08
- Probability question - please help!, Zerex71, 17:03
- Re: Integrals, mathman, 16:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:56
- Re: Prime numbers, mathman, 16:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 16:50
- Re: precedence of negation and times, matt271829-news, 16:45
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Barry Schwarz, 16:39
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:26
- Re: Numerical differentiation formulas?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:26
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Chuck Grempu, 16:26
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:23
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Dave Seaman, 16:22
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ronald Bruck, 16:20
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Robert Israel, 16:20
- Re: precedence of negation and times, Proginoskes, 16:18
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:17
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Proginoskes, 16:15
- Prime numbers, Colin, 16:14
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, sttscitrans, 16:14
- Re: precedence of negation and times, Robert Israel, 16:13
- Re: precedence of negation and times, zxcv_890, 16:12
- Re: Quadratic eigenvalue problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:11
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, Ronald Bruck, 16:10
- Re: precedence of negation and times, Proginoskes, 16:09
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, The World Wide Wade, 16:04
- Numerical differentiation formulas?, 1940LaSalle, 16:01
- Re: Another Galois theory problem, Arturo Magidin, 16:00
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 15:59
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:58
- Re: precedence of negation and times, matt271829-news, 15:58
- JSH: Surprised even me, CapCity, 15:55
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James, 15:54
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:50
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 15:47
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, Ronald Bruck, 15:41
- Another Galois theory problem, Doug B, 15:41
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James, 15:39
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 15:31
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:29
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Aatu Koskensilta, 15:28
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:28
- Re: Another nice mean value like theorem, The World Wide Wade, 15:28
- Re: Quadratic eigenvalue problem, Ronald Bruck, 15:27
- Was: Advice on integral (sorry, lost the original thread), [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 15:27
- Re: Need Help with Limit, Andreas Dieckmann, 15:24
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:14
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:14
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, The World Wide Wade, 15:13
- Re: Modular Arithmetic, Phil Carmody, 15:09
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 15:09
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 15:04
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 14:57
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, David Hartley, 14:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:35
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Marc Olschok, 14:26
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 14:26
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 14:25
- Re: JSH: Now what?, gjedwards, 14:24
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:20
- Re: Sudoku question, Rob Pratt, 14:19
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James, 14:16
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, willo_thewisp, 14:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:10
- precedence of negation and times, zxcv_890, 14:08
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:02
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Marc Olschok, 14:01
- Affine spaces as posets, hermann, 13:56
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Maury Barbato, 13:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:50
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, The World Wide Wade, 13:49
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, sttscitrans, 13:43
- Re: Analytic with mean bounds in circles, eugene, 13:42
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Aatu Koskensilta, 13:41
- Re: Modular Arithmetic, Tim Peters, 13:40
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, David R Tribble, 13:37
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Dave Seaman, 13:36
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Chip Eastham, 13:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:29
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, David R Tribble, 13:28
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Patrick Coilland, 13:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:20
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, David R Tribble, 13:14
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, george, 13:13
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 13:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 13:07
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Daryl McCullough, 13:00
- Re: JSH: Now what?, Tim Peters, 12:59
- Re: Sudoku question, Randy Poe, 12:57
- Quadratic eigenvalue problem, rjfmv, 12:54
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:52
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:45
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Aatu Koskensilta, 12:41
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben, 12:38
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Lasse, 12:35
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben, 12:34
- Re: Algebra problem, Frank Palmer, 12:25
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:24
- Sudoku question, Frank Palmer, 12:19
- Re: A class of special functions, Robert Israel, 12:17
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Duncan Muirhead, 12:17
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Dave Seaman, 12:15
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Lasse, 12:13
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Aatu Koskensilta, 12:07
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Toni Lassila, 12:06
- Algebra problem, Jake Mulch, 12:04
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:01
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben, 12:00
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James, 12:00
- Re: Simplifying Algebraic expression, Badger, 11:59
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Patrick Coilland, 11:58
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Helmut Richter, 11:56
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:55
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben, 11:52
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Jiri Lebl, 11:43
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, fishfry, 11:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:40
- Re: Modular Arithmetic, fishfry, 11:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:38
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:35
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 11:34
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 11:33
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, fishfry, 11:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:32
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, guenther vonKnakspot, 11:32
- Re: Another nice mean value like theorem, eugene, 11:31
- Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Marc Olschok, 11:31
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 11:29
- Re: The Fermat primes are surely interesting!, Dan, 11:29
- Re: Simplifying Algebraic expression, amzoti, 11:28
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 11:23
- Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, gjedwards, 11:20
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, amzoti, 11:18
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 11:13
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Dave L. Renfro, 11:10
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Aatu Koskensilta, 11:10
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Chuck Grempu, 11:10
- Another nice mean value like theorem, eugene, 11:09
- Re: Simplifying Algebraic expression, Dave L. Renfro, 11:07
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, eugene, 11:05
- non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben, 11:05
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Dave L. Renfro, 11:04
- Simplifying Algebraic expression, Jeffrey Spoon, 11:04
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, abo, 11:04
- Re: JSH: Now what?, Chuck Grempu, 11:02
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:58
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:54
- Re: The gcd of a set A, and of P, the set of primes, hagman, 10:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 10:53
- Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, donstockbauer, 10:53
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, donstockbauer, 10:48
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 10:44
- Re: Relations and Species of Structures, Mitch, 10:41
- Re: JSH: Is it possible?, Randy Poe, 10:40
- Re: Function from rationals(probably using Stern-Brocot tree ), Patrick Coilland, 10:38
- Re: Probability: Ace of Spades from a pack of cards, Randy Poe, 10:37
- Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Dave L. Renfro, 10:36
- Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Dave L. Renfro, 10:32
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James, 10:24
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James, 10:17
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:15
- Mathematical modeling of Orkut, Ben, 10:10
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, David C . Ullrich, 10:02
- Re: Analytic with mean bounds in circles, David C . Ullrich, 09:59
- Re: Probability: Ace of Spades from a pack of cards, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 09:56
- Re: Analytic with mean bounds in circles, eugene, 09:54
- Re: JSH: Is it possible?, David C . Ullrich, 09:50
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, Tom, 09:50
- Re: order of a number mod p ?, bert, 09:45
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, David C . Ullrich, 09:45
- Re: Analytic with mean bounds in circles, Torsten Hennig, 09:44
- Re: Modular Arithmetic, William Elliot, 09:43
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, David C . Ullrich, 09:42
- Re: Another Galois theory problem, Timothy Murphy, 09:40
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David C . Ullrich, 09:34
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David C . Ullrich, 09:32
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David C . Ullrich, 09:30
- Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, eugene, 09:29
- Re: The gcd of a set A, and of P, the set of primes, William Elliot, 09:27
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, David C . Ullrich, 09:27
- Re: need help: automorphisms of the complex number field, jcsantos, 09:15
- Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, ashu_1559, 09:13
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 09:11
- Re: Differentiabilty and Lipschitz condition, Amanda, 09:09
- Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James, 09:00
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:57
- perhps it is end of the struggle, Student of Math, 08:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:55
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 08:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:49
- Re: order of a number mod p ?, Doug Goncz, 08:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, georgie, 08:44
- The gcd of a set A, and of P, the set of primes, Doug Goncz, 08:39
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:34
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 08:32
- Re: Modular Arithmetic, Pubkeybreaker, 08:27
- Analytic with mean bounds in circles, eugene, 08:11
- Re: Probability: Ace of Spades from a pack of cards, WhytheQ, 08:11
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 08:08
- Equations, Rahul, 08:06
- Re: Grundzüge der Mathematik: V1 Translation Error?, Dik T. Winter, 08:02
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 08:00
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Rob Johnson, 07:54
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, Math1723, 07:52
- Re: need help: automorphisms of the complex number field, boris, 07:44
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, Tom, 07:43
- Re: Fourier theory help, Abstract Dissonance, 07:41
- Re: A class of special functions, Maury Barbato, 07:41
- Re: Possible to estimate a unknown barrier from only one realization of time series?, dave, 07:40
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tez, 07:39
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, Jonathan Hoyle, 07:39
- Clifford Numbers in Mathcad, Doug Goncz, 07:34
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Maury Barbato, 07:25
- Modular Arithmetic, J. B. Wood, 07:25
- Re: Bunch of actors, Abstract Dissonance, 07:24
- Re: Is it possible?, Abstract Dissonance, 07:24
- Re: Grundzüge der Mathematik: V1 Translation Error?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 07:23
- Fourier theory help, Abstract Dissonance, 07:22
- Re: Probability: Ace of Spades from a pack of cards, Jonathan Hoyle, 07:21
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Maury Barbato, 07:20
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, matt271829-news, 07:13
- Probability: Ace of Spades from a pack of cards, WhytheQ, 07:13
- Discrete mathematical modeling of Orkut, Ben, 06:42
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:33
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Alois Steindl, 06:25
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 06:12
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 06:11
- Re: Need Help with Limit, Andreas Dieckmann, 06:08
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, William Elliot, 06:06
- Re: JSH: Is it possible?, José Carlos Santos, 05:59
- Re: need help: automorphisms of the complex number field, José Carlos Santos, 05:58
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:47
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, Tom, 05:47
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Badger, 05:46
- Re: JSH: Now what?, gjedwards, 05:44
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:41
- Re: Puzzle: Double smaller-too, Tapio, 05:28
- Re: JSH: Is it possible?, Justin, 05:19
- need help: automorphisms of the complex number field, boris, 05:10
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Aatu Koskensilta, 04:44
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 04:42
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Virgil, 04:05
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 03:49
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, J. B. Kennedy, 03:41
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:24
- Re: Best Fit Straight Line, Han de Bruijn, 03:10
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, J. B. Kennedy, 02:55
- Re: JSH: Now what?, Tim Peters, 02:54
- Possible to estimate a unknown barrier from only one realization of time series?, Lucy, 02:41
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Herman Jurjus, 02:18
- Re: JSH: Surprised even me, guenther vonKnakspot, 02:12
- Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Tim Peters, 02:08
- JSH: Surprised even me, jstevh, 01:49
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 01:46
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 01:42
- Re: JSH: Now what?, jstevh, 01:42
- Re: Another Galois theory problem, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:31
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 01:31
- Re: A class of special functions, Robert Israel, 01:29
- Re: Another Galois theory problem, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 01:16
- Re: The Fermat primes are surely interesting!, Proginoskes, 01:13
- Re: Tough Galois theory problem., magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:09
- Re: JSH: Is it possible?, Gib Bogle, 00:59
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:55
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:28
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:09
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Rob Johnson, 00:06
- Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Karl M. Bunday, 00:02
July 11, 2006
- How to determine phase of m-sequence, Steve W, 23:47
- Re: Bunch of actors, Chuck Grempu, 23:44
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:41
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 23:37
- Re: JSH: Now what?, Tim Peters, 23:35
- Re: JSH: Is it possible?, fishfry, 23:31
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:31
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:12
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:58
- JSH: Bunch of actors, jstevh, 22:50
- Re: JSH: Now what?, jstevh, 22:48
- Re: JSH: Now what?, Tim Peters, 22:25
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Jonathan Hoyle, 22:25
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Dik T. Winter, 22:21
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 22:01
- Re: JSH: Is it possible?, jstevh, 22:00
- Re: A GCD Question, Doug Goncz, 21:54
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:35
- Re: JSH: Is it possible?, Justin, 21:33
- Re: Tough Galois theory problem., Doug B, 21:24
- Another Galois theory problem, Doug B, 21:18
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Gerry Myerson, 21:15
- Re: Is it possible?, Norm Grimpo, 21:05
- Re: Relations and Species of Structures, William Elliot, 21:03
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, The World Wide Wade, 21:00
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, William Elliot, 20:56
- Re: Is it possible?, jstevh, 20:55
- Re: Is it possible?, Norm Grimpo, 20:54
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, William Elliot, 20:37
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Gerry Myerson, 20:24
- JSH: Is it possible?, jstevh, 20:16
- Re: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Robert Israel, 20:14
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 20:07
- Re: gauge conditions, Robert Israel, 20:05
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Gerry Myerson, 19:54
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 19:53
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 19:51
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 19:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 19:46
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 19:39
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 19:32
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 19:23
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 19:22
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:14
- Re: Puzzle: Double smaller-too, Peter L. Montgomery, 19:11
- Re: An uncountable countable set, David Hartley, 19:09
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, david petry, 19:07
- Re: A difficult problem in real analysis, Robert Israel, 19:05
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Gene Ward Smith, 19:00
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 18:59
- Re: CAV/CLV/CAA-, oscwr, 18:56
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 18:52
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:51
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:51
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Gene Ward Smith, 18:48
- Re: Non-measurable sets i R^n, Robert Israel, 18:45
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Jonathan Hoyle, 18:36
- Re: Multiple use of chain rule question:, wardnine, 18:26
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Lasse, 18:21
- Re: What do you call these things? (And questions about them.), Keith A. Lewis, 18:21
- Re: (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:21
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 18:19
- (4m/s^2)/2s = ?, Dennis B, 18:19
- Re: Absolutely continuous, xsin(1/x), Norm Grimpo, 18:14
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 18:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 18:10
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Jack Campin - bogus address, 18:08
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 18:07
- The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Maury Barbato, 18:06
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:06
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 18:03
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 17:58
- A class of special functions, Maury Barbato, 17:54
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Aatu Koskensilta, 17:54
- Re: gauge conditions, anonymous101, 17:49
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Patricia Shanahan, 17:47
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Gene Ward Smith, 17:44
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Lasse, 17:39
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 17:31
- Re: Absolutely continuous, xsin(1/x), Jiri Lebl, 17:30
- Re: help me with a 2D random walk problem, workhardnorest, 17:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 17:27
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, david petry, 17:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 17:25
- Re: Absolutely continuous, xsin(1/x), Jiri Lebl, 17:24
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, david petry, 17:21
- Re: Prime numbers, Hugo Pfoertner, 17:20
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Patricia Shanahan, 17:14
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Gene Ward Smith, 17:12
- Re: Non-measurable sets i R^n, Jiri Lebl, 17:05
- Re: Non-measurable sets i R^n, David C . Ullrich, 17:04
- Re: Function from rationals(probably using Stern-Brocot tree ), eugene, 16:59
- Re: Absolutely continuous, xsin(1/x), David C . Ullrich, 16:56
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, david petry, 16:55
- Re: Differentiabilty and Lipschitz condition, David C . Ullrich, 16:53
- Re: Best Fit Straight Line, Gottfried Helms, 16:53
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 16:51
- Re: Non-measurable sets i R^n, Dave L. Renfro, 16:49
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Gene Ward Smith, 16:49
- Re: A difficult problem in real analysis, eugene, 16:49
- Re: Non-measurable sets i R^n, Dave L. Renfro, 16:46
- Re: formula for 1/1+1/2+1/3+1/4+1/5......+1/(L-1), Gene Ward Smith, 16:38
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Dave L. Renfro, 16:34
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, David C . Ullrich, 16:33
- Re: RxR lexicographic product, Robert Israel, 16:30
- Re: Non-measurable sets i R^n, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:26
- Re: Non-measurable sets i R^n, Aatu Koskensilta, 16:24
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, matt271829-news, 16:23
- Re: formula for 1/1+1/2+1/3+1/4+1/5......+1/(L-1), Robert Israel, 16:23
- Non-measurable sets i R^n, Amanda, 16:19
- Re: help me with a 2D random walk problem, matt271829-news, 16:17
- Re: Advice on integral?, Bart Goddard, 16:10
- Re: Advice on integral?, Robert Israel, 16:08
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Amanda, 16:01
- RxR lexicographic product, lataianu bogdan, 16:00
- formula for 1/1+1/2+1/3+1/4+1/5......+1/(L-1), borje, 15:59
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 15:57
- Re: Advice on integral?, Bart Goddard, 15:56
- Re: A GCD Question, Tim Peters, 15:37
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 15:37
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 15:19
- Re: Free product of Z and Z/2Z, Marc Olschok, 15:12
- Advice on integral?, David, 15:07
- Re: Differentiabilty and Lipschitz condition, Amanda, 15:06
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:40
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 14:35
- A GCD Question, Doug Goncz, 14:34
- Re: gauge conditions, Robert Israel, 14:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 14:23
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Aatu Koskensilta, 14:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:08
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 14:06
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:06
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 14:00
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:55
- Re: CAV/CLV/CAA-, Dave Seaman, 13:54
- Re: Need Help with Limit, Robert Israel, 13:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:42
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 13:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:38
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:37
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 13:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:32
- Re: Need Help, Rick Decker, 13:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:28
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:24
- Re: Need Help, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:24
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 13:23
- Re: Need Help, amzoti, 13:22
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 13:20
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Tom, 13:19
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 13:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:15
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 13:13
- Need Help, TommyG, 13:12
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, polaris431, 13:12
- Re: Absolutely continuous, xsin(1/x), amzoti, 13:11
- Need Help, TommyG, 13:11
- Re: Absolutely continuous, xsin(1/x), Dave L. Renfro, 13:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:06
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 13:06
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 13:04
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 13:03
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 12:58
- What do you call these things? (And questions about them.), tomhcmi, 12:55
- Absolutely continuous, xsin(1/x), James, 12:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 12:50
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Virgil, 12:46
- Re: CAV/CLV/CAA-, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:42
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 12:39
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Tom, 12:36
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow, 12:32
- Re: Function from rationals(probably using Stern-Brocot tree ), Robert Israel, 12:32
- Re: How many different ways of this this equation...., aliprinter, 12:26
- Re: Multiple use of chain rule question:, Randy Poe, 12:25
- Questions inspired by reading Apollonius of Perga on Conic Sections, tomhcmi, 12:21
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Robert J. Kolker, 12:18
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:13
- Re: Pi Is Rational, Dave L. Renfro, 12:09
- Re: CAV/CLV/CAA-, oscwr, 12:09
- gauge conditions, anonymous101, 12:08
- gauge conditions, anonymous101, 12:08
- Multiple use of chain rule question:, wardnine, 11:59
- Re: Differentiabilty and Lipschitz condition, The World Wide Wade, 11:56
- Re: Earth depicted as a transposed globe onto a disk, Randy Poe, 11:52
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Dave L. Renfro, 11:47
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, stephen, 11:46
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, J. B. Kennedy, 11:35
- Re: Definition of Derivative and its relationship with the concept of differential, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 11:33
- Re: Earth depicted as a transposed globe onto a disk, draccarlawpet, 11:27
- Re: Earth depicted as a transposed globe onto a disk, draccarlawpet, 11:27
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 11:25
- Re: How to combine the results of two Maximum Likelihood Estimation?, Herman Rubin, 11:22
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 11:22
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:18
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Dave Seaman, 11:15
- Re: analysis with improper integral., mina_world, 11:15
- Re: Question about Cantor's proof, Aatu Koskensilta, 11:10
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Lasse, 11:10
- Re: help me with a 2D random walk problem, workhardnorest, 11:05
- Question about Cantor's proof, Math1723, 11:04
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Aatu Koskensilta, 11:01
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:01
- Re: Disconnecting the sphere, Lee Rudolph, 11:01
- Differentiabilty and Lipschitz condition, Amanda, 11:01
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:00
- Re: The Fermat primes are surely interesting!, Dan, 11:00
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 10:58
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:56
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 10:54
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Lasse, 10:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:39
- Grundzüge der Mathematik: V1 Translation Error?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:34
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 10:22
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 10:17
- Re: The Fermat primes are surely interesting!, Dan, 10:09
- Re: Need Help with Limit, David C . Ullrich, 10:07
- DSP audio signals, Steve, 10:06
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 09:57
- Disconnecting the sphere, jn, 09:52
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, David C . Ullrich, 09:51
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Tom, 09:49
- Re: Ant moves on a Box, Narasimham, 09:42
- Re: Basic inequalities, eugene, 09:36
- Re: assist please???, Norm Grimpo, 09:26
- Re: Eichkoerper = gauge body ?--, JEMebius, 09:25
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 09:12
- Basic inequalities, alex kim, 09:08
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:06
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 09:04
- Re: Function from rationals(probably using Stern-Brocot tree ), A N Niel, 09:04
- Re: Definition of Derivative and its relationship with the concept of differential-, JEMebius, 08:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, georgie, 08:57
- Re: Need Help with Limit, Andreas Dieckmann, 08:53
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, polaris431, 08:48
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, Tom, 08:48
- Re: help me with a 2D random walk problem, matt271829-news, 08:47
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Bill Dubuque, 08:42
- Re: Eichkoerper = gauge body ?-, JEMebius, 08:40
- Re: Eichkoerper = gauge body ?-, G. A. Edgar, 08:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, georgie, 08:40
- Re: Function from rationals(probably using Stern-Brocot tree ), eugene, 08:35
- Re: Definition of Derivative and its relationship with the concept of differential, Han de Bruijn, 08:33
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 08:30
- Proof theoretical consistency proofs (Was: Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans), Aatu Koskensilta, 08:28
- Re: Definition of Derivative and its relationship with the concept of differential, Han de Bruijn, 08:27
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 08:11
- Re: Need Help with Limit, phadamasci, 08:11
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 08:09
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 08:07
- Re: Need Help with Limit, David C . Ullrich, 07:59
- Re: Eichkoerper = gauge body ?-, Lee Rudolph, 07:50
- Re: assist please???, Claire, 07:43
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 07:43
- Re: assist please???, Claire, 07:41
- Re: assist please???, G.E. Ivey, 07:33
- Re: Definition of Derivative and its relationship with the concept of differential, G.E. Ivey, 07:28
- Definition of Derivative and its relationship with the concept of differential, greenishguy, 07:02
- Re: Properties of weakly continuous maps in a Hilbert space, David C . Ullrich, 06:56
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, David C . Ullrich, 06:47
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, David C . Ullrich, 06:42
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, J. B. Kennedy, 06:41
- Re: Dense subset of C, Lee Rudolph, 06:39
- assist please???, Claire, 06:34
- Need Help with Limit, Andreas Dieckmann, 06:24
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, imaginatorium, 06:23
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:20
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:09
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 05:55
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, J. B. Kennedy, 05:53
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tez, 05:52
- Re: Function from rationals(probably using Stern-Brocot tree ), William Elliot, 05:51
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 05:51
- Re: Pi Is Rational, Gene Ward Smith, 05:34
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Mike Kelly, 05:33
- Re: Pi Is Rational, a.khanm@xxxxxxxxx, 05:20
- Re: Pi Is Rational, a.khanm@xxxxxxxxx, 05:13
- Best Fit Straight Line, Han de Bruijn, 05:08
- Re: Projected small circles, christriddle, 04:54
- Re: Prime numbers, Gene Ward Smith, 04:44
- Relations and Species of Structures, jb, 04:26
- Re: Prime numbers, Phil Carmody, 04:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 04:07
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Herman Jurjus, 04:05
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 03:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 03:52
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 03:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 03:45
- How to combine the results of two Maximum Likelihood Estimation?, Lucy, 03:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 03:39
- Re: Puzzle: Double smaller-too, Tapio, 03:25
- Re: integral of the mean function over [0,1], eugene, 02:43
- Re: Function from rationals(probably using Stern-Brocot tree ), eugene, 02:40
- Re: which is bigger, bill, 02:25
- Re: Fuzzy comparison, Michael Jørgensen, 02:09
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 01:23
- Re: analysis with improper integral., Robert Israel, 01:05
- Re: Puzzle: Double smaller-too, Robert Israel, 00:54
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:48
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:43
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, polaris431, 00:37
- The Fermat primes are surely interesting!, Dan, 00:27
- Re: Tough Galois theory problem., Arturo Magidin, 00:26
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:15
July 10, 2006
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Tony Orlow, 23:51
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, websnarf, 23:46
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Tony Orlow, 23:46
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 23:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 23:31
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 23:14
- Re: Even and Odd Problem, Doug Goncz, 23:01
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Tony Orlow, 23:00
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Jonathan Hoyle, 22:54
- Re: Dense subset of C, The World Wide Wade, 22:45
- Re: Need help with finite series!, Gerry Myerson, 22:38
- Re: question with integral., William Elliot, 22:37
- Re: Need help with finite series!, Ronald Bruck, 22:34
- Re: Properties of weakly continuous maps in a Hilbert space, Ronald Bruck, 22:30
- Re: An Inequality Problem, William Elliot, 22:10
- Re: analysis with improper integral., mina_world, 22:00
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, Virgil, 21:53
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Virgil, 21:47
- Re: calculating (interest), Norm Grimpo, 21:40
- Re: help me with a 2D random walk problem, workhardnorest, 21:37
- Eichkoerper = gauge body ?, sttscitrans, 21:34
- Re: help me with a 2D random walk problem, workhardnorest, 21:31
- Re: length propotion to volume, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:13
- Re: Earth depicted as a transposed globe onto a disk, David W . Cantrell, 21:13
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:12
- Re: Function from rationals(probably using Stern-Brocot tree ), Robert Israel, 21:03
- Re: length propotion to volume, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:01
- Re: Properties of weakly continuous maps in a Hilbert space, Jim Burns, 20:59
- Re: Earth depicted as a transposed globe onto a disk, matt271829-news, 20:57
- Re: Need help with finite series!, cbrown, 20:55
- Re: length propotion to volume, Tony Orlow, 20:51
- Re: Prime numbers, Gerry Myerson, 20:42
- Re: Earth depicted as a transposed globe onto a disk, Peter Webb, 20:39
- Re: calculating (interest), C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:30
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Gerry Myerson, 20:28
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 20:23
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 20:20
- Totally irrelevant, jt64, 20:19
- Re: Need help with finite series!, Gerry Myerson, 20:00
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David R Tribble, 19:52
- Re: CAV/CLV/CAA-, oscwr, 19:49
- Re: CAV/CLV/CAA-, JEMebius, 19:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 19:14
- Re: analysis with improper integral., amzoti, 19:01
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Nathan, 18:59
- Re: Free product of Z and Z/2Z, Arturo Magidin, 18:50
- Re: Equivalence relations and "is a sibling of", Arturo Magidin, 18:49
- Re: How many different ways of this this equation...., Proginoskes, 18:45
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 18:43
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 18:40
- Re: Function from rationals(probably using Stern-Brocot tree ), Keith A. Lewis, 18:36
- Re: analysis with improper integral., Robert Israel, 18:35
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:30
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 18:30
- Re: Surjective morphism (Q_+, *) to (Q, +), cbrown, 18:27
- Re: which is bigger, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 18:20
- Re: Prime numbers, Pubkeybreaker, 18:18
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:13
- Re: Uncountable model of PA, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:08
- Re: Function from rationals(probably using Stern-Brocot tree ), Nathan, 18:07
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Lasse, 17:43
- Function from rationals(probably using Stern-Brocot tree ), eugene, 17:38
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, albstorz, 17:34
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, Phil Carmody, 17:29
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:26
- Re: Prime numbers, Phil Carmody, 17:22
- Re: calculating (interest), Mandy, 17:20
- Re: Komogorov's Criterion, David C. Ullrich, 17:17
- Re: which is bigger, Dann Corbit, 17:16
- Re: calculating (interest), mathman, 17:14
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, David C . Ullrich, 17:12
- Re: Surjective morphism (Q_+, *) to (Q, +), eugene, 17:07
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, Randy Poe, 16:59
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, Gene Ward Smith, 16:58
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, Rick Decker, 16:57
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, phadamasci, 16:53
- Re: calculating (interest), gjedwards, 16:49
- calculating (interest), Claire, 16:43
- Re: which is bigger, bill, 16:42
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, matt271829-news, 16:40
- Re: Tough Galois theory problem., Doug B, 16:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:08
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:02
- Re: Need help with finite series!, my7x57, 16:00
- Re: Need help with finite series!, Gene Ward Smith, 15:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:44
- Re: Newton Raphson variants..., Dann Corbit, 15:43
- Re: Need help with finite series!, Keith A. Lewis, 15:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:40
- Re: Prime numbers, luiroto, 15:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:38
- Re: Earth depicted as a transposed globe onto a disk, David W . Cantrell, 15:27
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:22
- Re: Puzzle: Double smaller-too, Tapio, 15:20
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow, 15:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:15
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Jens Kruse Andersen, 15:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:09
- Re: Free product of Z and Z/2Z, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 15:04
- Re: Need help with finite series!, A N Niel, 15:04
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, imaginatorium, 15:01
- Re: Surjective morphism (Q_+, *) to (Q, +), mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 14:57
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow, 14:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:56
- Re: Tensor Decomposition, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 14:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:47
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, Mike Deeth, 14:45
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:39
- Re: Surjective morphism (Q_+, *) to (Q, +), jsher, 14:38
- Re: How much of choice is needed for mathematics?, Herman Jurjus, 14:37
- Re: Uncountable model of PA, Dave Seaman, 14:37
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:33
- Re: Need help with finite series!, my7x57, 14:33
- Re: Puzzle: Double smaller-too, bill, 14:33
- Re: Pi Is Rational, Dave L. Renfro, 14:26
- Re: Prime numbers, Pubkeybreaker, 14:25
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, Tom, 14:22
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 14:20
- Re: Need help with finite series!, Pubkeybreaker, 14:18
- Re: Projected small circles, matt271829-news, 14:15
- Re: Surjective morphism (Q_+, *) to (Q, +), eugene, 14:14
- Re: Need help with finite series!, Pubkeybreaker, 14:14
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 14:09
- Re: Prime numbers, simon . sallen, 14:07
- Re: Need help with finite series!, Mitch, 14:03
- Re: Need help with finite series!, my7x57, 14:02
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, J. B. Kennedy, 14:02
- Re: Need help with finite series!, A N Niel, 13:59
- Re: Surjective morphism (Q_+, *) to (Q, +), Valeriu Anisiu, 13:59
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:53
- Re: Counter-Examples to Mean ond Other Forms of Convergence, Jeffrey Rolland, 13:52
- Re: Need help with finite series!, Robert Israel, 13:50
- Free product of Z and Z/2Z, James, 13:50
- Re: Prime numbers, simon . sallen, 13:49
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 13:48
- Re: Even and Odd Problem, Keith A. Lewis, 13:48
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 13:44
- Re: analysis with improper integral., Robert Israel, 13:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 13:38
- Re: Need help with finite series!, my7x57, 13:38
- Re: How many different ways of this this equation...., Keith A. Lewis, 13:34
- Re: An exact 1-D summation challenge - 10 - Peter L. Montgomery, Robert Israel, 13:32
- Re: Uncountable model of PA, ashu_1559, 13:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 13:24
- Re: Equivalence relations and "is a sibling of", sttscitrans, 13:24
- Re: Uncountable model of PA, Dave Seaman, 13:22
- Uncountable model of PA, ashu_1559, 13:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:15
- Re: Need help with finite series!, Pubkeybreaker, 13:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 13:10
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 13:09
- Re: analysis with improper integral., amzoti, 13:08
- Order Statistic in Random Process/Random Sequence, fan_bai, 13:03
- Re: analysis with improper integral., amzoti, 12:59
- Re: Pi Is Rational, Pubkeybreaker, 12:59
- Re: length volume proportion, Tom, 12:59
- Need help with finite series!, my7x57, 12:49
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:49
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, Pubkeybreaker, 12:47
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, Pubkeybreaker, 12:44
- Re: All Mathematics is Flawed, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:43
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, polaris431, 12:42
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:38
- Re: An exact 1-D summation challenge - 10 - Peter L. Montgomery, Valeriu Anisiu, 12:28
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:27
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 12:25
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, BuddhaThu, 12:23
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 12:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 12:17
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:48
- analysis with improper integral., mina_world, 11:47
- Re: Properties of weakly continuous maps in a Hilbert space, David C . Ullrich, 11:40
- Re: Earth depicted as a transposed globe onto a disk, Randy Poe, 11:38
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, David C . Ullrich, 11:37
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:32
- Re: How much of choice is needed for mathematics?, Herman Rubin, 11:31
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, polaris431, 11:30
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:30
- Re: Earth depicted as a transposed globe onto a disk, David W . Cantrell, 11:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:27
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:25
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:21
- Properties of weakly continuous maps in a Hilbert space, Jack Stone, 11:18
- Re: What is the expected value of a truncated trivariate normal distribution?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:11
- What is the expected value of a truncated trivariate normal distribution?, chrislbartlett, 11:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:09
- Matrix Inverse Question, James Mc Laughlin, 11:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:05
- Earth depicted as a transposed globe onto a disk, draccarlawpet, 11:04
- Re: Algebraic Structure Name Confusion, Mitch, 11:02
- Re: Dense subset of C, Lee Rudolph, 10:48
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 10:43
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:42
- Re: Dense subset of C, eugene, 10:37
- Re: Dense subset of C, Lee Rudolph, 10:33
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:27
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Jens Kruse Andersen, 10:21
- CAV/CLV/CAA, oscwr, 10:18
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Jens Kruse Andersen, 10:18
- Re: Algebraic Structure Name Confusion, jpawloski, 10:15
- Algebraic Structure Name Confusion, jpawloski, 10:12
- Re: length volume proportion, Narasimham, 10:10
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, J. B. Kennedy, 10:01
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Richard Henry, 09:47
- length volume proportion, spolsky, 09:38
- Even and Odd Problem, Doug Goncz, 09:29
- length propotion to volume, spolsky, 09:28
- An Inequality Problem, Doug Goncz, 09:25
- Surjective morphism (Q_+, *) to (Q, +), eugene, 09:15
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave Seaman, 09:02
- Re: polynomials in a difference table, alex . lupas, 08:58
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, Dave Seaman, 08:54
- Re: All Mathematics is Flawed, Robert J. Kolker, 08:40
- Re: Regarding the stock markets, matt271829-news, 08:37
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 08:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Christian Clason, 08:29
- Re: question with integral., A N Niel, 08:29
- Total set of complex number is in a hemisphere?, phadamasci, 08:27
- Re: Why you can not count real number?, David C . Ullrich, 08:16
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, David C . Ullrich, 08:15
- Re: Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, G.E. Ivey, 08:15
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Lasse, 08:08
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, G.E. Ivey, 08:05
- Re: Regarding the stock markets, Lady Musketeer, 08:05
- Irrationality and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, J. B. Kennedy, 08:02
- Re: Tensor Decomposition, Ulysse from CH, 08:01
- Why you can not count real number?, phadamasci, 07:59
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Hatto von Aquitanien, 07:58
- Re: How many different ways of this this equation...., Tom, 07:34
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, albstorz, 07:31
- Re: How many different ways of this this equation...., Narcoleptic Insomniac, 07:25
- Re: Unitary Matrix group - not, Hauke Reddmann, 07:06
- Re: Regarding the stock markets, matt271829-news, 07:05
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 07:04
- Annihilators, Dan, 07:03
- Re: Komogorov's Criterion, David C. Ullrich, 07:00
- How many different ways of this this equation...., aliprinter, 06:48
- Re: random selections of integers from the infinite set of all integers, Tom, 06:36
- Projected small circles, christriddle, 06:29
- Re: All Mathematics is Flawed, Mike Kelly, 06:29
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, David C . Ullrich, 06:28
- Re: All Mathematics is Flawed, guenther vonKnakspot, 06:14
- Re: Dense subset of C, Lasse, 06:08
- Re: question with integral., William Elliot, 06:05
- Re: Dense subset of C, Lasse, 06:04
- Re: Dense subset of C, eugene, 06:01
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Lasse, 05:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:52
- Re: Dense subset of C, William Elliot, 05:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:49
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:45
- All Mathematics is Flawed, Hatto von Dumbass, 05:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 05:39
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 10, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:38
- Dense subset of C, eugene, 05:35
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:34
- Puzzle: Double smaller-too, Tapio, 05:32
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:30
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:21
- Unitary Matrix group - not, Hauke Reddmann, 05:06
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Hatto von Aquitanien, 04:40
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tez, 04:34
- Re: Consistency of Classical Analysis: "Unproven", Hatto von Aquitanien, 04:15
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Herman Jurjus, 04:07
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Gene Ward Smith, 04:01
- generalization of polynomial b-splines to rational, martin, 03:36
- Re: How much of choice is needed for mathematics?, Herman Jurjus, 03:32
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 03:31
- Re: Function F:R^2 -> N, Patrick Coilland, 03:11
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 03:06
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Gerry Myerson, 03:05
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:05
- Re: Elliptic integral of the seconnd kind with complex amplitude, Paul Abbott, 03:04
- Re: taylor couette flow between two cylinders (outer cylinder stationary) solution through eigen value with the help of bessel function, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 02:59
- Re: FORGERY FORGERY FORGERY ALERT!! THERE ARE FORGERS FORGING RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI ON THIS FORUM - I DEMAND THE MODERATORS BAN THE FORGER AND LAUNCH AN INVESTIGATION INTO THESE FORGERIES OF A CHRIST - SHERIFF DANIEL ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION?!!, Ludwig Prinn, 02:58
- Re: ? solve linear system eqns row-by-row, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 02:53
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, guenther vonKnakspot, 02:51
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, guenther vonKnakspot, 02:42
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 02:39
- Re: taylor couette flow between two cylinders (outer cylinder stationary) solution through eigen value with the help of bessel function, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 02:32
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, polaris431, 02:22
- Re: Existence-Uniqueness thrm first order linear ODEs, Robert Israel, 02:05
- Regarding the stock markets, Lady Musketeer, 02:00
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 01:50
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, johannblake, 01:23
- Re: ? solve linear system eqns row-by-row, Virgil, 01:18
- Re: How many combinations possible?, Chip Eastham, 01:03
- Re: ? solve linear system eqns row-by-row, Cheng Cosine, 00:57
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:32
- Re: Book on Numbers and mathematics in general, Rajnish Kumar, 00:30
July 09, 2006
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:50
- Tensor Decomposition, xyz91234, 23:49
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 23:29
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:27
- Existence-Uniqueness thrm first order linear ODEs, A Aitken, 23:27
- Re: ? solve linear system eqns row-by-row, Virgil, 23:14
- Re: Komogorov's Criterion, ArtflDodgr, 23:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 23:08
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 23:06
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Gene Ward Smith, 22:49
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:42
- Re: Prime numbers, Gene Ward Smith, 22:37
- Re: Homology of S^2 by Identifying the north pole, W. Dale Hall, 22:34
- Re: Prime numbers, Dave Rusin, 22:21
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 21:54
- Re: Strategy for caputuring FLT, fernando revilla, 21:09
- Re: dimension of the subspace of operators, Dave Rusin, 21:08
- Re: Function F:R^2 -> N, Butch Malahide, 21:01
- Re: Komogorov's Criterion, Herman Rubin, 20:51
- Re: Tough Galois theory problem., Arturo Magidin, 20:48
- Re: Tough Galois theory problem., mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 20:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:23
- Re: Riemann Zeta Function, Abstract Dissonance, 20:23
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:19
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 20:11
- Tough Galois theory problem., Doug B, 20:10
- Re: Book on Numbers and mathematics in general, Gerry Myerson, 20:05
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Proginoskes, 20:02
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 18:45
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 18:10
- Re: Equivalence relations and "is a sibling of", Arturo Magidin, 18:05
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Hero, 18:00
- Re: help me with a 2D random walk problem, Gib Bogle, 17:57
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, david petry, 17:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:50
- Re: help me with a 2D random walk problem, matt271829-news, 17:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:48
- Re: geek code-, Gib Bogle, 17:45
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:42
- Re: Pi Is Rational, Ronald Bruck, 17:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:19
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:13
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:11
- Re: Consistency of Classical Analysis: "Unproven", Gene Ward Smith, 16:29
- FORGERY FORGERY FORGERY ALERT!! THERE ARE FORGERS FORGING RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI ON THIS FORUM - I DEMAND THE MODERATORS BAN THE FORGER AND LAUNCH AN INVESTIGATION INTO THESE FORGERIES OF A CHRIST - SHERIFF DANIEL ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION?!!, Raymond Karczewski, 16:24
- Re: Green's green? (Incredibly Important Question), A N Niel, 16:21
- Re: help me with a 2D random walk problem, workhardnorest, 16:19
- Re: Counter-Examples to Mean ond Other Forms of Convergence, Jeffrey Rolland, 16:17
- Re: question with velocity., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:11
- Re: Green's green? (Incredibly Important Question), jhnrmsdn, 16:02
- Re: Equivalence relations and "is a sibling of", sttscitrans, 15:58
- Re: Sum and difference of independent variables, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:54
- Re: 100 men,85 married,70 own phone,75 own car,80 own house,minmum number of people who have all these, matt271829-news, 15:46
- Re: Sum and difference of independent variables, rtonyreeder, 15:40
- Re: help me with a 2D random walk problem, matt271829-news, 15:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:24
- Re: Riemann Zeta Function, PaulHjelmstad, 15:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:13
- Re: How many real numbers are there?, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:00
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:59
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:53
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:53
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:41
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Lasse, 14:36
- Re: Sanity check - probability theory, David C . Ullrich, 14:33
- Re: 100 men,85 married,70 own phone,75 own car,80 own house,minmum number of people who have all these, Unomano, 14:30
- Re: Consistency of Classical Analysis: "Unproven", Keith Ramsay, 14:28
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:25
- Re: Green's green? (Incredibly Important Question), David C . Ullrich, 14:23
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:18
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:14
- Re: Relation of Levy Stable and General Gaussian distributions?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:04
- Re: Green's green? (Incredibly Important Question), Dave L. Renfro, 13:56
- Re: Student-t distribution - profound or biased?, WGSGNUAYHTTE, 13:29
- ? solve linear system eqns row-by-row, Cheng Cosine, 13:11
- Re: Green's green? (Incredibly Important Question), Mohan Pawar, 12:52
- Derivatives of the Mathieu functions, cosmicstring, 12:50
- Re: Sum and difference of independent variables, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:31
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 12:18
- Re: help me with a 2D random walk problem, workhardnorest, 12:13
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, johannblake, 12:12
- Re: Green's green? (Incredibly Important Question), Mohan Pawar, 12:07
- Re: question with velocity., mina_world, 12:03
- integral of the mean function over [0,1], eugene, 11:55
- Re: help me with a 2D random walk problem, workhardnorest, 11:54
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, johannblake, 11:47
- Re: question with velocity., José Carlos Santos, 11:43
- Re: Function F:R^2 -> N, Robert Sheskey, 11:35
- question with velocity., mina_world, 11:27
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:21
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:16
- Re: question with integral., mina_world, 11:16
- Re: Sum and difference of independent variables, rtonyreeder, 11:15
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 11:13
- Re: Pi Is Rational, Dave L. Renfro, 11:01
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 11:00
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Franziska Neugebauer, 10:56
- Re: Pi Is Rational, Dave L. Renfro, 10:53
- Sanity check - probability theory, Micha Keijzers, 10:52
- Re: geek code-, JEMebius, 10:49
- Re: Green's green? (Incredibly Important Question), Dave L. Renfro, 10:38
- Re: Four Color Theorem, icahit, 10:37
- Green's green? (Incredibly Important Question), David C . Ullrich, 10:06
- Re: how to generate a random number following truncated Weibull distribution?, john2, 06:48
- Re: Function F:R^2 -> N, Patrick Coilland, 03:26
- Re: Generalized Gaussian variable,, Nissim Nabar, 03:25
- Re: A difficult problem in real analysis, Robert Israel, 03:12
- Re: which is bigger, James Waldby, 02:59
- Re: which is bigger, Robert Israel, 02:37
- Re: Sum and difference of independent variables, Robert Israel, 02:35
- Re: Sum and difference of independent variables, Robert Israel, 02:31
- Re: Pi Is Rational, Gene Ward Smith, 02:25
- Re: help with series!!, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 02:19
- Re: help with series!!, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 02:07
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Jonathan Hoyle, 02:04
- Re: The horse and the general problem, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:53
- Re: Sum of series, Robert Israel, 01:45
- Re: How many real numbers are there?, Math1723, 01:45
- Re: The horse and the general problem, Gib Bogle, 01:41
- Re: Real Integral w/ Complex Analysis, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 01:08
- Re: The horse and the general problem, fishfry, 01:03
- Re: Book for Linear Programming, Proginoskes, 00:59
- Re: The horse and the general problem, Chip Eastham, 00:55
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 00:51
- Re: a cardinality problem, Proginoskes, 00:49
- Re: The horse and the general problem, rtonyreeder, 00:43
- Re: The horse and the general problem, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:39
- Re: Sum and difference of independent variables, rtonyreeder, 00:36
- help with series!!, bill, 00:21
- analysis with improper integral, mina_world, 00:19
- Re: Relation of Levy Stable and General Gaussian distributions?, conover, 00:08
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:08
- The horse and the general problem, kqurtyhar, 00:06
July 08, 2006
- help me with a 2D random walk problem, workhardnorest, 23:37
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 23:29
- Fermat no. F_9 = 2^(2^9)+1. wats FFF FF9= ? huge. tan90., don . lotto, 23:16
- An approximate inverse for atanh(x)/x, David W . Cantrell, 23:03
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:02
- Geometric solids. Terminology. Target Pharmacy pill bottle., Don Saklad, 23:00
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:00
- An Analysis Problem, RLG, 22:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 22:48
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:40
- Re: Newton Raphson variants..., Dik T. Winter, 22:24
- Re: Newton Raphson variants..., Dik T. Winter, 22:20
- Re: Equivalence relations and "is a sibling of", Arturo Magidin, 22:07
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:03
- Re: which is bigger, Dave Seaman, 21:57
- Equivalence relations and "is a sibling of", sttscitrans, 21:44
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 21:44
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dik T. Winter, 21:40
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, matt271829-news, 21:23
- Re: 100 men,85 married,70 own phone,75 own car,80 own house,minmum number of people who have all these, Chip Eastham, 21:19
- Re: 100 men,85 married,70 own phone,75 own car,80 own house,minmum number of people who have all these, Peter L. Montgomery, 20:53
- Re: 100 men,85 married,70 own phone,75 own car,80 own house,minmum number of people who have all these, divya, 20:46
- Re: 100 men,85 married,70 own phone,75 own car,80 own house,minmum number of people who have all these, Jeremy Boden, 20:17
- Re: 100 men,85 married,70 own phone,75 own car,80 own house,minmum number of people who have all these, David Hartley, 20:16
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:11
- Re: Joseph Fourier's resting place, Dave L. Renfro, 19:57
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 19:55
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 19:49
- Joseph Fourier's resting place, Fernando Gonzalez del Cueto, 19:45
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Robert J. Kolker, 19:43
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, jt64, 19:41
- Re: 100 men,85 married,70 own phone,75 own car,80 own house,minmum number of people who have all these, Chip Eastham, 19:32
- Re: which is bigger, Dave L. Renfro, 19:29
- The Holy Scripture of God, God as He is presently known, Lord Raymond of Cave Junction, Raymond Karczewski, 19:28
- Re: Sum and difference of independent variables, Pubkeybreaker, 19:21
- 100 men,85 married,70 own phone,75 own car,80 own house,minmum number of people who have all these, divya, 19:18
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:16
- Re: Sum of series, Dave L. Renfro, 18:58
- Book for Linear Programming, alex_G, 18:58
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 18:45
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Chip Eastham, 18:43
- Free automatic UNIVERSAL objective test/inventory/survey scorer, sci_guy, 18:34
- Supersolid Emergent Gravity, Jack Sarfatti, 18:13
- Re: Sum of series, Dave Seaman, 17:57
- Re: Function F:R^2 -> N, Robert Sheskey, 17:54
- Re: Relation of Levy Stable and General Gaussian distributions?, Herman Rubin, 17:12
- Re: how to generate a random number following truncated Weibull distribution?, matt271829-news, 17:00
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 16:57
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:46
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, david petry, 16:43
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Hatto von Aquitanien, 16:42
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:40
- Re: which is bigger, Ioannis, 16:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:39
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:29
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 16:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:15
- Re: Relation of Levy Stable and General Gaussian distributions?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:09
- Re: Real Integral w/ Complex Analysis, David C . Ullrich, 16:00
- Re: which is bigger, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:59
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:59
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:50
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, David C . Ullrich, 15:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:48
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:43
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:40
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, David C . Ullrich, 15:39
- Re: how to generate a random number following truncated Weibull distribution?, Anon., 15:38
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 15:30
- Re: Real Integral w/ Complex Analysis, Badger, 15:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:25
- Re: Homology of S^2 by Identifying the north pole, Lee Rudolph, 15:16
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Virgil, 15:05
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 15:01
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Charlie, 15:01
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:00
- TEST, bill, 14:58
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 14:58
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 14:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 14:53
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Virgil, 14:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 14:44
- test, bill, 14:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 14:40
- Re: Ant moves on a Box, bill, 14:35
- Re: Function F:R^2 -> N, Patrick Coilland, 14:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 14:34
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, fishfry, 14:32
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 14:31
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:30
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 14:30
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 14:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:28
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 14:28
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Chip Eastham, 14:24
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:20
- Re: Sum and difference of independent variables, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:19
- Re: Sum of series, Bill Dubuque, 14:17
- Re: a cardinality problem, Keith A. Lewis, 14:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 14:13
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 14:09
- Re: how to generate a random number following truncated Weibull distribution?, john2, 14:08
- Homology of S^2 by Identifying the north pole, vitor, 14:07
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, kunzmilan, 14:06
- Re: Function F:R^2 -> N, eugene, 14:05
- Re: Sum of series, Bill Dubuque, 14:01
- Re: Newton Raphson variants..., Peter Luschny, 13:48
- Re: Function F:R^2 -> N, Patrick Coilland, 13:47
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, matt271829-news, 13:42
- Relation of Levy Stable and General Gaussian distributions?, conover, 13:40
- Re: Hilbert space?-, JEMebius, 13:35
- I am looking for information about nonlinear differential forms and its applications, andrzej, 13:20
- Re: How to determine an equation from data, bill, 13:20
- Re: Function F:R^2 -> N, eugene, 12:16
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, David R Tribble, 12:15
- Re: dimension of the subspace of operators, Jannick Asmus, 12:09
- Re: Function F:R^2 -> N, David R Tribble, 12:04
- Re: Let An Intellectual Visionary Save England : Turing, Ed Murphy, 11:56
- Re: Real Integral w/ Complex Analysis, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 11:50
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Jürgen Ren, 11:49
- Re: Consistency of Classical Analysis: "Unproven", Aatu Koskensilta, 11:49
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:44
- Function F:R^2 -> N, eugene, 11:27
- dimension of the subspace of operators, eugene, 11:26
- Re: Real Integral w/ Complex Analysis, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 11:26
- Re: Real Integral w/ Complex Analysis, David C . Ullrich, 11:25
- Re: What is the correct expression in English?, stush, 11:19
- Re: Newton Raphson variants..., Phil Carmody, 11:14
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, David C . Ullrich, 11:14
- Re: Percentages from/to negative integers, WhytheQ, 11:09
- weakly continuous mapping in a Hilbert space f(f(x))=x, Jack Stone, 11:04
- Re: Newton Raphson variants..., Phil Carmody, 11:01
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:48
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:43
- A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, polaris431, 10:35
- Re: What is the correct expression in English?, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:32
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:21
- Re: a cardinality problem, Peter Webb, 10:05
- Re: What is the correct expression in English?, Randy Poe, 10:05
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Jürgen Ren, 10:04
- Re: What is the correct expression in English?, Randy Poe, 09:56
- Re: No n=3 Pauli matrix analog?, Hauke Reddmann, 09:51
- What is the correct expression in English?, pkg, 09:47
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:38
- Re: Rational Points, OwlHoot, 09:35
- Re: Rational Points, OwlHoot, 09:27
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Aatu Koskensilta, 09:24
- Real Integral w/ Complex Analysis, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 09:16
- Re: Percentages from/to negative integers, drmwecker, 09:12
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:00
- Re: How many real numbers are there?, Aatu Koskensilta, 08:53
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Aatu Koskensilta, 08:28
- Re: a cardinality problem, Dave Seaman, 08:26
- help with lists operations, omk, 08:17
- Hilbert space?, kunzmilan, 07:54
- Re: order of a number mod p ?, Doug Goncz, 07:53
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Hatto von Aquitanien, 07:51
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, David C . Ullrich, 07:38
- Re: is it Lebesgue-measure zero?, David C . Ullrich, 07:27
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, David C . Ullrich, 07:20
- Re: Foci of a conic, Oscar Lanzi III, 07:17
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 07:09
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Jürgen Ren, 06:55
- Does standard Kalman filter work if errors are not normally distributed?, Kenneth Onyee, 06:39
- Foci of a conic, LordBeotian, 06:32
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:17
- Re: order of a number mod p ?, Gottfried Helms, 05:53
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Gene Ward Smith, 05:50
- Re: The set-theoretic platinum standard, Gene Ward Smith, 05:48
- Re: Newton Raphson variants..., Peter Luschny, 05:43
- Instructions for Erecting Houses of Worship in MY HOLY NAME, Raymond Karczewski, 05:42
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:35
- Re: A difficult problem in real analysis, muyu, 05:33
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Gene Ward Smith, 05:23
- Re: polynomials in a difference table, Alex. Lupas, 05:17
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:15
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:11
- Re: Newton Raphson variants..., Hugo Pfoertner, 04:58
- Re: solution to an ODE or solution of an ODE, pkg, 04:41
- Re: How to determine an equation from data, andrzej, 04:35
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Patrick, 04:22
- Re: How many real numbers are there?, donstockbauer, 04:19
- Re: Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Gene Ward Smith, 04:11
- Attempts to Refute Cantor's Uncountability Proof?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 04:06
- Re: Ant moves on a Box, Philippe 92, 04:02
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:40
- Re: Adjacency Matrix, kunzmilan, 03:38
- Re: a cardinality problem, Butch Malahide, 03:36
- Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:18
- Re: How to determine an equation from data, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 03:08
- Re: Is {} and element of all sets?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:05
- Re: a cardinality problem, Virgil, 02:43
- Re:What can be said about e, Dan, 02:30
- Re:What can be said about e, Dan, 02:02
- Re: How many real numbers are there?, Virgil, 02:02
- Re: Integrating t^(-3/2) * e^(1/t), Ronald Bruck, 01:53
- Re: How to determine an equation from data, Virgil, 01:53
- Re: a cardinality problem, Virgil, 01:48
- Re: a cardinality problem, Denis Feldmann, 01:45
- Re: The problem with infinite and the existance of existance, Proginoskes, 01:40
- Re: Unique ID for authors, Proginoskes, 01:35
- Re: Book on Numbers and mathematics in general, Rajnish Kumar, 01:31
- Re: Pi Is Rational, Proginoskes, 01:28
- Re: a cardinality problem, Proginoskes, 01:13
- Re: How many real numbers are there?, Denis Feldmann, 00:57
- Re: Prime numbers, Gerry Myerson, 00:56
- Re: which is bigger, Gerry Myerson, 00:49
- Re: How many real numbers are there?, Jonathan Hoyle, 00:44
- Signal Nonlocality Real or Imaginary?, Jack Sarfatti, 00:33
- Re: Sum and difference of independent variables, rtonyreeder, 00:23
- Re: How to determine an equation from data, bill, 00:21
- Re: The problem with infinite and the existance of existance, Timothy87, 00:05
July 07, 2006
- Re: How many real numbers are there?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:43
- Re: how to generate a random number following truncated Weibull distribution?, rtonyreeder, 23:43
- Re: How many real numbers are there?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:35
- Re: Let An Intellectual Visionary Save England : Turing, William Elliot, 23:28
- Re: How many real numbers are there?, Mike Deeth, 23:06
- E-mails, CoreyWhite@xxxxxxxxx, 23:05
- Re: Bounded variation function, The World Wide Wade, 22:41
- Re: Unique ID for authors, Ronald Bruck, 22:40
- Re:What can be said about e, Oscar Lanzi III, 22:31
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 22:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 21:48
- Re: Is it dyscalcula?, Ioannis, 21:41
- On Emergent Curved Space-Time, Jack Sarfatti, 21:36
- Re: Is it dyscalcula?, Gene Ward Smith, 21:26
- Re: Is it dyscalcula?, Aegimius, 21:07
- how to generate a random number following truncated Weibull distribution?, Lucy, 21:01
- Re: Newton Raphson variants..., Phil Carmody, 20:53
- Re: Let An Intellectual Visionary Save England : Turing, don . lotto, 20:49
- Re: Unique ID for authors, Richard Giuly, 20:48