sci.math (date)
June 30, 2006
- Re: New arithmetic function, Patrick Coilland, 16:18
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, jon, 16:13
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Dave L. Renfro, 16:08
- Re: The set-theoretic platinum standard, Gene Ward Smith, 16:03
- Re: New arithmetic function, BuddhaThu, 15:53
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, david petry, 15:51
- Re: Is there an elegant parametrization a 2x2 precision matrix?, Ray Koopman, 15:51
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow, 15:47
- Re: Is there an elegant parametrization a 2x2 precision matrix?, Chip Eastham, 15:40
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, David R Tribble, 15:36
- Re: The set-theoretic platinum standard, Herman Rubin, 15:32
- Re: SVD, Ray Koopman, 15:31
- Re: Is there an elegant parametrization a 2x2 precision matrix?, Kenneth Onyee, 15:28
- Re: Is there an elegant parametrization a 2x2 precision matrix?, Kenneth Onyee, 15:27
- Re: A problem in fitting curve, Ray Koopman, 15:27
- Re: Extensions of Curves, W. Dale Hall, 15:25
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Dale Shoults, 15:25
- Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, boanerges35, 15:10
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow, 15:10
- Re: Is there an elegant parametrization a 2x2 precision matrix?, Ray Koopman, 15:08
- Re: Limit+fractional part, The World Wide Wade, 15:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:07
- Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Herman Rubin, 15:07
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, David R Tribble, 15:00
- Re: Limit+fractional part, Patrick Coilland, 14:59
- Re: Limit+fractional part, eugene, 14:45
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:38
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder, 14:36
- The set-theoretic platinum standard, Gene Ward Smith, 14:30
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder, 14:23
- Re: Range of Function, Michel Hack, 14:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:19
- Re: Extensions of Curves, Maury Barbato, 14:10
- Re: Unique Alternating Multilinear D:R^n->R, HopfZ, 14:03
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Dale Shoults, 14:01
- Re: Unique Alternating Multilinear D:R^n->R, Christopher J. Henrich, 13:57
- Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, The World Wide Wade, 13:45
- Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, Rob Pratt, 13:36
- Re: What annoys you in mathematical text?, David R Tribble, 13:35
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 13:21
- Re: Uniform continuity and analyticity over the reals, The World Wide Wade, 13:18
- Common tangents, -marko-, 13:10
- Re: Uniform continuity and analyticity over the reals, José Carlos Santos, 13:09
- Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?, Gene Ward Smith, 13:07
- Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 12:56
- Re: Some (slightly used) math books for sale, dgiaimo, 12:53
- Re: Uniform continuity and analyticity over the reals, Kurio, 12:48
- Re: What annoys you in mathematical text?, HopfZ, 12:46
- Re: Uniform continuity and analyticity over the reals, Kurio, 12:45
- Re: Uniform continuity and analyticity over the reals, José Carlos Santos, 12:33
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Dale Shoults, 12:31
- Uniform continuity and analyticity over the reals, Kurio, 12:27
- Re: topology with norm space., José Carlos Santos, 12:24
- Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 12:10
- Re: Limit+fractional part, Patrick Coilland, 12:02
- Unique Alternating Multilinear D:R^n->R, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:13
- Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, The Qurqirish Dragon, 11:06
- Re: Limit+fractional part, eugene, 10:59
- Re: analysis with sup., mina_world, 10:58
- Re: integral, Bart, 10:48
- Re: What annoys you in mathematical text?, N. Silver, 10:45
- Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, The Qurqirish Dragon, 10:44
- Re: Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, Dave L. Renfro, 10:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 10:32
- Re: What annoys you in mathematical text?, Han de Bruijn, 10:27
- Re: Limit+fractional part, Patrick Coilland, 10:06
- Re: sequence of continuous functions, eugene, 09:52
- Re: Best Fit Circle made Easy, Han de Bruijn, 09:51
- Re: Limit+fractional part, eugene, 09:46
- Re: sequence of continuous functions, David C . Ullrich, 09:41
- Re: Limit+fractional part, A N Niel, 09:33
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, matt271829-news, 09:23
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, matt271829-news, 09:15
- Functional series+3^n, eugene, 09:05
- Re: Best Fit Circle made Easy, Gottfried Helms, 08:54
- Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Bart, 08:44
- Limit+fractional part, eugene, 08:44
- Re: What annoys you in mathematical text?, Lee Rudolph, 08:43
- SVD, m . mashoof, 08:39
- Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Aatu Koskensilta, 08:35
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, optionstraderjeff, 08:24
- New arithmetic function, bouayoun, 08:23
- What annoys you in mathematical text?, Toni Lassila, 08:13
- Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Bart, 08:04
- Re: integral, G. A. Edgar, 08:03
- Re: Best Fit Circle made Easy, Han de Bruijn, 07:57
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Denis Feldmann, 07:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:53
- Re: integral, G. A. Edgar, 07:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 07:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:43
- Re: Is there an elegant parametrization a 2x2 precision matrix?, Gottfried Helms, 07:40
- Re: Tensor Inverse?, Timothy Murphy, 07:37
- From the free iPod people..., GratefulHead, 07:34
- Re: A problem in fitting curve, makc . the . great, 07:29
- Re: A problem in fitting curve, makc . the . great, 07:27
- Re: analysis with sup., G.E. Ivey, 07:25
- Re: A problem in fitting curve, matt271829-news, 07:07
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:52
- topology with norm space., mina_world, 06:46
- analysis with sup., mina_world, 06:26
- Is there an elegant parametrization a 2x2 precision matrix?, Kenneth T. Onyee, 06:09
- Re: right ordered set structure, William Elliot, 06:02
- Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Bart, 05:54
- Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, William Elliot, 05:53
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Denis Feldmann, 05:38
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Denis Feldmann, 05:34
- Re: Tensor Inverse?, Hauke Reddmann, 05:32
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, bert, 05:29
- Re: functions in set theory, Jose Capco, 05:24
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder, 04:42
- Re: functions in set theory, Jose Capco, 04:35
- Re: functions in set theory, Jose Capco, 04:08
- Re: integral, Bart, 04:06
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 04:03
- Re: integral, Bart, 03:48
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Denis Feldmann, 03:43
- Re: Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, sumarjaya, 03:42
- Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Denis Feldmann, 03:38
- Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Bart, 03:26
- Re: Best Fit Circle made Easy, Han . deBruijn, 03:06
- Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Bertie Reed, 03:04
- Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, eugene, 02:53
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:47
- Re: Adjacency Matrix, Robert Israel, 02:25
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low, 02:23
- A problem in fitting curve, Yu Bo, 02:22
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder, 02:16
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 02:09
- irreducible polynomial+connectedness, eugene, 02:08
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 01:54
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 01:47
- Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Robert Israel, 01:34
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low, 01:33
- Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 01:26
- Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:50
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 00:50
- John Cramer's Transaction and Matter Waves, Jack Sarfatti, 00:48
- Re: Range of Function, The World Wide Wade, 00:25
- Re: Range of Function, The World Wide Wade, 00:24
- John Cramer's TI 2, Jack Sarfatti, 00:24
June 29, 2006
- Re: Range of Function, Parikshit Shah, 23:58
- Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, The World Wide Wade, 23:55
- Re: Range of Function, William Elliot, 23:50
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 23:46
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, gino, 23:42
- Re: Linking points on algebraic curves with class numbers, David Bernier, 23:29
- Range of Function, Simon Dean, 23:28
- Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:23
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:20
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 23:17
- Re: Elliptic integral of the seconnd kind with complex amplitude, Badger, 23:08
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:05
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:52
- Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:48
- Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Chip Eastham, 22:42
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:32
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, tbonepower07, 22:26
- Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, Tim Peters, 22:17
- Re: 7-th power, Robert Israel, 22:13
- Re: Need help in evaluating, ahoyaho, 22:06
- Re: help with an integral which looks similar to elliptic integrals., Gene Ward Smith, 21:48
- Re: Need help in evaluating, The World Wide Wade, 21:41
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Doug Goncz, 21:31
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder, 21:20
- Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:15
- help with an integral which looks similar to elliptic integrals., len, 20:59
- help with an integral which looks similar to elliptic integrals., len, 20:59
- Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., Bob, 20:47
- Re: function space cardinality, The World Wide Wade, 20:25
- Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:16
- A question on a cyclotomic prime number, genkisaito@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:00
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, W. Dale Hall, 19:41
- Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:40
- Re: integral, Robert Israel, 19:38
- Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:38
- Re: # {x from G : x^n = e}, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:36
- Re: Need help in evaluating, mathman, 19:36
- A question in linear Algebra, Clocker, 19:19
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 19:18
- Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Ronald Bruck, 19:06
- Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., Bob, 18:50
- Adjacency Matrix, yelena13, 18:47
- Re: rounding question, Patrick FitzGerald, 18:43
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, David W . Cantrell, 18:39
- Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Arturo Magidin, 18:28
- Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Lee Rudolph, 18:19
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Lee Rudolph, 18:10
- Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, bill, 18:04
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Michael Orion, 18:04
- Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, matt271829-news, 18:02
- Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 18:02
- Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, amzoti, 18:01
- Re: Best Fit Circle made Easy, Ray Koopman, 17:59
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 17:55
- Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, Gene Wagenbreth, 17:52
- Re: # {x from G : x^n = e}, Arturo Magidin, 17:50
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, matt271829-news, 17:47
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 17:46
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 17:44
- Need help in evaluating, ahoyaho, 17:36
- function space cardinality, Robert Sheskey, 17:30
- Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Arturo Magidin, 17:30
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 17:25
- I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, Pious Audio, 17:22
- Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Gene Ward Smith, 17:10
- Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., Jens Kruse Andersen, 17:08
- Re: "dimensionality" v. "dimension" (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Ken Pledger, 17:05
- Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Bart, 17:04
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Lee Rudolph, 16:55
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 16:53
- Re: Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, Ken Pledger, 16:52
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low, 16:46
- Re: integral, Bart, 16:45
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 16:45
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 16:44
- Re: sequence of continuous functions, eugene, 16:28
- Re: "Foundations of Analysis" by Landau - which version?, Eric J. Wingler, 16:21
- sequence of continuous functions, Amanda, 16:21
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, matt271829-news, 16:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:48
- Re: Recommended way to relearn math?, Herb Martin, 15:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:37
- Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Gene Ward Smith, 15:33
- Re: point estimation of variance, Herman Rubin, 15:30
- Re: Computing pdf from cdf, danheyman@xxxxxxxxx, 15:21
- Re: Computing pdf from cdf, david petry, 15:13
- Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Axel Vogt, 15:03
- Re: rounding question, Jonathan Cass, 14:58
- Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Gene Ward Smith, 14:56
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:35
- Re: integral, G. A. Edgar, 14:33
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, BuddhaThu, 14:31
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Hugo Pfoertner, 14:18
- Re: Computing pdf from cdf, Robert Israel, 14:16
- rounding question, slifedt, 14:14
- Re: Best Fit Circle made Easy, Robert Israel, 14:08
- # {x from G : x^n = e}, eugene, 14:07
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1)-, The World Wide Wade, 13:58
- Re: 7-th power, Deep, 13:53
- Re: Extensions of Curves, The World Wide Wade, 13:35
- Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 13:34
- Re: Simple proof of FLT ?, Roman B. Binder, 13:08
- Re: functions in set theory, José Carlos Santos, 13:02
- Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder, 13:01
- Re: functions in set theory, Jose Capco, 12:56
- The number of polynomials, Aloha Kakuikanu, 12:55
- Re: Much more simple ?, Roman B. Binder, 12:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Gc, 12:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:43
- Re: JSH: Latest factoring idea is crap, Roman B. Binder, 12:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 12:40
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Pinky, 12:39
- Re: Skewed Variances, Robert Israel, 12:36
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 12:34
- Re: right ordered set structure, cbrown, 12:17
- Re: functions in set theory, M.J.T. Guy, 12:05
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:54
- Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Lee Rudolph, 11:54
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Tom, 11:45
- integral, Bart, 11:42
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 11:40
- Extensions of Curves, Maury Barbato, 11:39
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Hyped, 11:30
- Re: Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, Dave L. Renfro, 11:30
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Denis Feldmann, 11:29
- Re: AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process), C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:28
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, bert, 11:27
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:14
- Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, boanerges35, 11:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 11:12
- Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, boanerges35, 11:12
- Eigen Vector Calculation, Shailesh, 11:09
- Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Larry Deack, 11:05
- Re: Computing pdf from cdf, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 11:01
- Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, eugene, 10:58
- Re: uniformly converge with z., mina_world, 10:56
- Re: Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, Dave L. Renfro, 10:53
- Re: Competition problem in number theory, bassam king karzeddin, 10:42
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Denis Feldmann, 10:38
- Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Hyped, 10:32
- Re: Tensor Inverse?, Timothy Murphy, 10:29
- Re: can someone confirm that I'm doing this correctly?, Pious Audio, 10:23
- Re: Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, bassam king karzeddin, 10:13
- Re: can someone confirm that I'm doing this correctly?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:57
- Re: can someone confirm that I'm doing this correctly?, A N Niel, 09:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:52
- Re: sequence sum, Dave L. Renfro, 09:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:49
- can someone confirm that I'm doing this correctly?, Pious Audio, 09:41
- Re: 4 dimensional "cylinder" problem, matt271829-news, 09:35
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:32
- Re: functions in set theory, José Carlos Santos, 09:31
- Re: variety ?, Fedor, 09:25
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:25
- Re: uniformly converge with z., José Carlos Santos, 09:21
- Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Martin, 09:21
- Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Pubkeybreaker, 09:18
- Re: perpetuum mobile success story, Dan, 09:16
- Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Martin, 09:13
- Re: Eigen vector calculation, Ian Parker, 09:11
- Eigen vector calculation, Shailesh, 09:01
- Re: is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, apc, 08:54
- Re: sequence sum, Dave L. Renfro, 08:53
- functions in set theory, Jose Capco, 08:35
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, Phil Sherrod, 08:33
- "dimensionality" v. "dimension" (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Lee Rudolph, 08:30
- Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, Robert Low, 08:21
- Re: parametrized x & y question., Michael Jørgensen, 08:18
- Re: 4 dimensional "cylinder" problem, Mateusz Berezecki, 08:12
- Re: Equivalent statements involving a commutative ring, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:07
- Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, sumarjaya, 08:06
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 08:06
- Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:02
- Re: Best Fit Circle made Easy, Han de Bruijn, 07:36
- parametrized x & y question., tamiry, 07:11
- Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Arturo Magidin, 06:52
- Re: uniformly converge with z., mina_world, 06:51
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 06:50
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:38
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:36
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, imaginatorium, 06:28
- Re: qustion about terminology., Lee Rudolph, 06:05
- Re: qustion about terminology., José Carlos Santos, 06:00
- Re: uniformly converge with z., José Carlos Santos, 05:57
- qustion about terminology., mina_world, 05:48
- Re: Best Fit Circle made Easy, Peter Spellucci, 05:43
- Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, eugene, 05:41
- uniformly converge with z., mina_world, 05:37
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:35
- Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, David C . Ullrich, 05:34
- Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Lee Rudolph, 05:32
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:28
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 05:27
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 05:24
- SeDuMi - predector, Ismail, 05:23
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:21
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:19
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 05:19
- Vector space or ot's orthogonal, eugene, 04:46
- Re: Index vs. Average, Rod, 04:24
- Re: Skewed Variances, Han de Bruijn, 04:02
- Re: Computing pdf from cdf, Han de Bruijn, 03:47
- Re: Computing pdf from cdf, Han de Bruijn, 03:33
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low, 03:28
- Re: Best Fit Circle made Easy, Han de Bruijn, 03:28
- AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process), pramodh, 03:21
- Index vs. Average, Protoman, 03:09
- Commutative Algebra, wcdtd, 02:46
- Re: variety ?, Jannick Asmus, 02:39
- Re: sufficent conditions for concavity?, The World Wide Wade, 02:37
- Re: Modified Bessel Function Second Kind, Robert Israel, 02:24
- Re: Modified Bessel Function Second Kind, A, 02:20
- Re: 7-th power, Robert Israel, 02:14
- Re: Urysohn's Lemma in Adult Rudin, Mike, 02:04
- Re: Urysohn's Lemma in Adult Rudin, The World Wide Wade, 01:55
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, Ray Koopman, 01:52
- Re: Modified Bessel Function Second Kind, Richard L. Hall, 01:31
- Re: Computing pdf from cdf, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 01:31
- Computing pdf from cdf, Eli Luong, 00:45
- Re: Linking points on algebraic curves with class numbers, Dave Rusin, 00:44
- Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., Robert Israel, 00:18
- Modified Bessel Function Second Kind, A, 00:12
June 28, 2006
- Re: Joint probability question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 23:40
- Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., Gerry Myerson, 23:39
- Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:38
- Re: "Foundations of Analysis" by Landau - which version?, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 23:30
- Re: Reading Math Books, Robert Israel, 23:27
- Joint probability question, Eli Luong, 23:02
- Re: Question about convention, William Elliot, 22:38
- Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., William Elliot, 22:30
- Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, William Elliot, 22:26
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 22:00
- Re: Urysohn's Lemma in Adult Rudin, Mike, 21:39
- Re: Question about convention, Ken Pledger, 21:29
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 20:58
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 20:53
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:47
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:39
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 20:38
- 7-th power, Deep, 20:37
- Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., Bill J., 20:37
- point estimation of variance, Eli Luong, 20:23
- Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:20
- Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, The World Wide Wade, 20:13
- Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, Gerry Myerson, 19:56
- Re: Reading Math Books, Lee Rudolph, 19:52
- Re: HIV antibody testing, Doug Goncz, 19:49
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 19:46
- Re: Urysohn's Lemma in Adult Rudin, NotP, 19:44
- Re: Linking points on algebraic curves with class numbers, Gene Ward Smith, 19:30
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Gene Ward Smith, 19:24
- Re: Linking points on algebraic curves with class numbers, Gene Ward Smith, 19:23
- Re: Elliptic integral of the seconnd kind with complex amplitude, Gene Ward Smith, 18:41
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:37
- Re: Linking points on algebraic curves with class numbers, OwlHoot, 18:35
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 18:30
- The Math Tutor's Handbook, Janzia, 18:28
- The Math Tutor's Handbook, Janzia, 18:27
- Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:26
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 18:25
- Re: Question about convention, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 18:24
- Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, Yecloud, 18:19
- John Cramer's QM TI and The Paranormal, Jack Sarfatti, 18:15
- Re: 4 dimensional "cylinder" problem, matt271829-news, 18:15
- Re: Reading Math Books, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 18:13
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Clifford Nelson, 18:06
- Re: Question about convention, Ken Pledger, 18:01
- Re: Urysohn's Lemma in Adult Rudin, Mike, 17:52
- Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, The World Wide Wade, 17:45
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Denis Feldmann, 17:34
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Gene Ward Smith, 17:33
- Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, Rick Decker, 17:32
- Re: Equivalent statements involving a commutative ring, NotP, 17:32
- Urysohn's Lemma in Adult Rudin, NotP, 17:29
- Re: sequence sum, Robert Israel, 17:26
- Model question, David Moran, 17:25
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 17:23
- Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, Yecloud, 17:19
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 17:16
- Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, The World Wide Wade, 17:15
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:14
- Re: Elliptic integral of the seconnd kind with complex amplitude, David W . Cantrell, 17:08
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 17:03
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 16:57
- Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, Yecloud, 16:54
- Re: Elliptic integral of the seconnd kind with complex amplitude, Gerald I. Evenden, 16:49
- number of operations for eigenvector and eigenvalue calculation ..., pluton, 16:45
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 16:39
- Re: Homomorphism, Hatto von Aquitanien, 16:38
- Linking points on algebraic curves with class numbers, Dave Rusin, 16:30
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Gene Ward Smith, 16:30
- Re: How many combinations possible?, Chip Eastham, 16:29
- Presentation of SL(3,Z), Christine, 16:26
- Re: Homomorphism, Hatto von Aquitanien, 16:20
- Re: Penrose's Problem, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:11
- Re: sufficent conditions for concavity?, Brandon Moore, 16:03
- Re: Elliptic integral of the seconnd kind with complex amplitude, Gene Ward Smith, 16:02
- Re: Recommended way to relearn math?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 16:01
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 15:57
- Re: Conjugates (group theory), eugene, 15:52
- Re: sufficent conditions for concavity?, The World Wide Wade, 15:49
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:48
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:47
- Re: How many combinations possible?, Proginoskes, 15:45
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 15:44
- Elliptic integral of the seconnd kind with complex amplitude, Gerald I. Evenden, 15:43
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:41
- Re: geometry & vector analysis, The World Wide Wade, 15:41
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 15:37
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Clifford Nelson, 15:35
- Re: Joint pdf question, Herman Rubin, 15:29
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:24
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:23
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:23
- Re: sufficent conditions for concavity?, Brandon Moore, 15:21
- Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, Dann Corbit, 15:21
- Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, The World Wide Wade, 15:15
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low, 15:05
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 15:05
- Re: sufficent conditions for concavity?, The World Wide Wade, 15:01
- geometry & vector analysis, tamiry, 15:01
- Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, mike4ty4, 14:56
- Re: Recommended way to relearn math?, Joe Van Dyk, 14:56
- Re: sequence sum, A N Niel, 14:51
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 14:51
- Re: sequence sum, David W . Cantrell, 14:50
- Re: variety ?, Fedor, 14:48
- Re: Is Mean/Standarad Deviation ever used?, Ray Koopman, 14:44
- Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, mike4ty4, 14:26
- Back FROM The Future 1, Jack Sarfatti, 14:25
- Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 14:25
- Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, luiroto, 14:18
- Re: Is Mean/Standarad Deviation ever used?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:58
- Re: Conjugates (group theory), Arturo Magidin, 13:58
- Re: Question about convention, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:56
- Re: Hamel bases (still!), Michael Stemper, 13:53
- sufficent conditions for concavity?, Brandon Moore, 13:53
- Re: Conjugates (group theory), eugene, 13:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:50
- Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:49
- Re: Is Mean/Standarad Deviation ever used?, Puppet_Sock, 13:40
- Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, Abstract Dissonance, 13:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:34
- Re: Easy Reasoning, Robert Israel, 13:32
- Re: Equivalent statements involving a commutative ring, Arturo Magidin, 13:31
- sequence sum, karthik, 13:29
- Is Mean/Standarad Deviation ever used?, draccarlawpet, 13:28
- How many way to make change for a quarter?, boanerges35, 13:25
- Equivalent statements involving a commutative ring, jamesdickerson00, 13:25
- help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, Yecloud, 13:20
- Conjugates (group theory), themadhatter012, 13:19
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:17
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 13:08
- Re: math tutors hand book, Dave L. Renfro, 12:46
- Re: Best Fit Circle made Easy, Peter Spellucci, 12:36
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Denis Feldmann, 12:36
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 12:36
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 12:36
- Re: topology-cutting point, Arturo Magidin, 12:13
- Here are some of the best Sites I have come across.Each link has a bunch of super hot movies and pics to download.Enjoy!, ronjeremydeluxe2, 12:13
- Re: Question about convention, Arturo Magidin, 12:10
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 12:05
- Re: Nonnegative linear operators on L^1 and convergence, David C . Ullrich, 12:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 11:27
- Re: analysis^, mina_world, 11:21
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 11:21
- Re: with power series., mina_world, 11:18
- Re: Easy Reasoning, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 11:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 11:13
- Re: A definite integral, Mate, 11:10
- Line Integrals, boanerges35, 11:00
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:59
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:55
- Re: with power series., mina_world, 10:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 10:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:31
- Re: Integration Book Rec., boanerges35, 10:31
- Re: Hamel bases (still!), Dave L. Renfro, 10:28
- Re: Integral of a modulus?, David W . Cantrell, 10:16
- Re: topology-cutting point, mina_world, 10:06
- Re: with power series., José Carlos Santos, 10:02
- Re: analysis^, mina_world, 10:01
- Re: A computation, Han de Bruijn, 10:00
- 4 dimensional "cylinder" problem, Mateusz Berezecki, 09:42
- Re: A computation, victor_meldrew_666, 09:42
- Re: analysis^, David C . Ullrich, 09:40
- Hamel bases (still!), Michael Stemper, 09:35
- Re: Nonnegative linear operators on L^1 and convergence, eugene, 09:33
- Re: A computation, David C . Ullrich, 09:20
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, David C . Ullrich, 09:17
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, David C . Ullrich, 09:12
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 09:10
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 09:09
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 09:05
- Re: Integral of a modulus?, Ben Young, 09:05
- Re: Word problem: Rate x time = distance, Zodness, 09:04
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 08:59
- Re: Nonnegative linear operators on L^1 and convergence, A N Niel, 08:56
- Re: "Foundations of Analysis" by Landau - which version?, G. A. Edgar, 08:54
- Best Fit Circle made Easy, Han de Bruijn, 08:18
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Anon., 08:09
- "Foundations of Analysis" by Landau - which version?, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 07:58
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Gary, 07:47
- Re: right orderded set structure cont., William Elliot, 07:45
- Re: right orderded set structure cont., William Elliot, 07:33
- Re: Homeomorphic to rationals, eugene, 07:07
- Nonnegative linear operators on L^1 and convergence, eugene, 07:04
- Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, fernando revilla, 06:59
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Lee Rudolph, 06:43
- Re: topology-cutting point, Robert Low, 06:16
- Re: A definite integral, Michael Jørgensen, 06:07
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, jmfbahciv, 06:06
- Re: topology-cutting point, William Elliot, 06:03
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, jmfbahciv, 06:02
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Tom Potter, 05:54
- Re: analysis^, mina_world, 05:42
- Re: Homeomorphic to rationals, William Elliot, 05:42
- Re: topology-cutting point, mina_world, 05:40
- with power series., mina_world, 05:27
- Re: Continious and bounded, William Elliot, 05:24
- Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, victor_meldrew_666, 05:06
- right orderded set structure cont., Phil, 05:04
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, ZZZjon, 04:54
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low, 04:46
- left noetherian module, Arman, 04:46
- Re: Tensor Inverse?, Robert Low, 04:41
- Homeomorphic to rationals, eugene, 04:35
- Tensor Inverse?, Hauke Reddmann, 04:16
- Re: Question about convention, Robert Low, 03:55
- Re: Question about convention, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 03:46
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low, 03:45
- Re: Non-increasing function+inequality, eugene, 03:28
- Re: A computation, Han de Bruijn, 03:24
- Re: A definite integral, Andreas Dieckmann, 03:18
- Re: Archimedes theorem on calculating volume of cylinder, sphere and cone, Denis Feldmann, 03:04
- Re: Question about convention, Robert Low, 03:04
- Re: S4/K~S3, Jim Heckman, 02:51
- Re: Archimedes theorem on calculating volume of cylinder, sphere and cone, gary, 02:39
- Re: Easy Reasoning, e_hobsbawm, 02:37
- Polynomial solution using matrices, bhupala, 02:37
- Re: Question about convention, Virgil, 02:36
- Re: JSH: Latest factoring idea is crap, José Carlos Santos, 02:28
- Re: probability estimates for a bird flu pandemic, guenter, 02:24
- Archimedes theorem on calculating volume of cylinder, sphere and cone, hee zi song, 02:10
- Penrose's Problem, Jack Sarfatti, 02:07
- Re: Word problem: Rate x time = distance, doki_pen, 02:04
- Re: Word problem: Rate x time = distance, Mike, 01:56
- Re: Question about convention, Paul Sperry, 01:56
- Re: Joint pdf question, Eli Luong, 01:49
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 01:27
- Re: Word problem: Rate x time = distance, Richard L. Hall, 01:09
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:55
- Re: Word problem: Rate x time = distance, guenther vonKnakspot, 00:54
- Re: Word problem: Rate x time = distance, guenther vonKnakspot, 00:52
- Re: Joint pdf question, rtonyreeder, 00:52
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:49
- Re: Word problem: Rate x time = distance, Zodness, 00:47
- Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, guenther vonKnakspot, 00:44
- Word problem: Rate x time = distance, doki_pen, 00:40
- Re: Recommended way to relearn math?, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 00:10
- Re: Question about convention, Bill Hale, 00:02
June 27, 2006
- Re: Joint pdf question, Robert Israel, 23:55
- Re: Question about convention, Mike, 23:38
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 23:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 23:28
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 23:22
- Re: Question about convention, William Elliot, 23:21
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 23:14
- Re: Reading Math Books, Abstract Dissonance, 23:14
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 23:14
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 23:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 23:06
- Re: A definite integral, William Elliot, 22:57
- Re: Reading Math Books, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 22:44
- Re: topology-cutting point, William Elliot, 22:39
- Re: evaluating certain double integral, Gerry Myerson, 22:36
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), James Waldby, 22:36
- Re: Question about convention, Gerry Myerson, 22:31
- Re: right ordered set structure, William Elliot, 22:31
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 22:28
- Re: Question about convention, Arturo Magidin, 22:23
- Re: Ellipse in a circle solved., matt271829-news, 22:20
- Re: Ellipse in a circle solved., Chip Eastham, 22:19
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 22:19
- Re: right ordered set structure, William Elliot, 22:14
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 22:12
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 22:12
- Re: Joint pdf question, Ray Koopman, 22:07
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 22:03
- Re: Joint pdf question, Eli Luong, 22:00
- Re: Reading Math Books, Russell, 21:58
- Re: Probability, matt271829-news, 21:56
- Question about convention, giganut, 21:53
- Re: Joint pdf question, rtonyreeder, 21:45
- Re: question on nonstandard normal distributions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:35
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), Russell, 21:31
- Joint pdf question, Eli Luong, 21:26
- Re: question on nonstandard normal distributions, Eli Luong, 21:20
- Re: Curves and Vector Fields, Lee Rudolph, 21:19
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 21:13
- Re: Curves and Vector Fields, Lionel Brits, 21:06
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:51
- Reading Math Books, gershon . bialer, 20:50
- Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, Dave Rusin, 20:49
- Re: How many combinations possible?, Robert Israel, 20:45
- Ellipse in a circle solved., bandasanders, 20:44
- evaluating certain double integral, joseph rivers, 20:43
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), Russell, 20:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:12
- Re: Non-increasing function+inequality, Robert Israel, 19:58
- Re: Integral of a modulus?, Gene Ward Smith, 19:49
- Re: Recommended way to relearn math?, Gene Ward Smith, 19:43
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), Gerry Myerson, 19:37
- Re: Skewed Variances, Robert Israel, 19:36
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Usher73, 19:00
- Re: Recommended way to relearn math?, Joe Van Dyk, 18:58
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Gene Ward Smith, 18:50
- Re: How many combinations possible?, Proginoskes, 18:49
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:42
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:32
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 18:30
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 18:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 18:20
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:19
- Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, Tim Peters, 18:17
- Re: decaying slope, Michael Reed, 18:15
- Re: Easy Reasoning, Robert Israel, 17:53
- Re: decaying slope, Robert Low, 17:47
- decaying slope, Michael Reed, 17:31
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:19
- Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, guenther vonKnakspot, 17:18
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:09
- Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, Abstract Dissonance, 17:08
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:06
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:04
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Gene Ward Smith, 17:02
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:01
- Re: Best Fit Line for Exponential Data, Ray Koopman, 16:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:54
- Re: Mathematicians, curtvon, 16:53
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:50
- Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, Tim Peters, 16:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:46
- Re: Heat Conduction, David Moran, 16:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:45
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:41
- Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, Abstract Dissonance, 16:40
- Re: Mathematicians, Randy Poe, 16:34
- Re: Heat Conduction, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:32
- Mathematicians, curtvon, 16:23
- Re: right ordered set structure, cbrown, 16:19
- Curves and Vector Fields, Maury Barbato, 16:17
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, stephen, 16:14
- Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, Abstract Dissonance, 16:09
- Re: JSH: SF: Progress, double factorization proven, Tim Peters, 16:03
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Gene Ward Smith, 16:00
- variety ?, Fedor, 15:57
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), Rob Pratt, 15:55
- Re: right ordered set structure, cbrown, 15:50
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Usher73, 15:49
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:49
- Re: Regression equation using absolute errors, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:40
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 15:33
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 15:28
- Re: ? vector with vector entries, Robert Israel, 15:17
- Re: Regression equation using absolute errors, draccarlawpet, 15:12
- Re: L^1[0,oo) integral question, Ronald Bruck, 15:05
- Re: Recommended way to relearn math?, Joe Van Dyk, 15:05
- Re: L^1[0,oo) integral question, Ronald Bruck, 14:59
- Re: Regression equation using absolute errors, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:49
- Re: L^1[0,oo) integral question, The World Wide Wade, 14:44
- Re: L^1[0,oo) integral question, José Carlos Santos, 14:44
- Re: L^1[0,oo) integral question, Ronald Bruck, 14:39
- Re: Probability, matt271829-news, 14:36
- How many combinations possible?, nowwicked, 14:35
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 14:34
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Gene Ward Smith, 14:25
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 14:21
- Re: JSH: Stepping it out, W. Dale Hall, 14:21
- Re: Probability, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:20
- Re: SF: Progress, double factorization proven, Rick Decker, 14:16
- Re: L^1[0,oo) integral question, eugene, 14:14
- Re: Littlewood on taking leave, José Carlos Santos, 14:03
- Re: Recommended way to relearn math?, Herman Rubin, 14:02
- Re: Heat Conduction, Robert Israel, 13:58
- Re: Probability, matt271829-news, 13:55
- Re: The mapping f - > f' and it's graph, eugene, 13:54
- Re: Non-increasing function+inequality, eugene, 13:44
- Re: Question about factoring..., Pious Audio, 13:42
- L^1[0,oo) integral question, James, 13:41
- Regression equation using absolute errors, draccarlawpet, 13:39
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), Jürgen Ren, 13:37
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 13:36
- Re: The mapping f - > f' and it's graph, The World Wide Wade, 13:34
- Re: topology-cutting point, Arturo Magidin, 13:34
- Re: Continious and bounded, The World Wide Wade, 13:29
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low, 13:29
- Re: " Solving 1 - f( f(x) / (1 -f(x) ) ) = 1 / (x^2 -2*x +3) , x > 2 ", Patrick Coilland, 13:26
- Re: topology-cutting point, mina_world, 13:24
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 13:22
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), The World Wide Wade, 13:16
- Re: topology-cutting point, NotP, 13:14
- Re: topology-cutting point, Arturo Magidin, 13:14
- Re: diverge 2.., The World Wide Wade, 13:11
- Re: topology-cutting point, mina_world, 13:10
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 13:07
- Re: Question about factoring..., Arturo Magidin, 13:05
- Re: Probability, Jussi Piitulainen, 13:04
- Re: Continious and bounded, Herman Rubin, 13:00
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:59
- Question about factoring..., Pious Audio, 12:59
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Dave Seaman, 12:57
- Re: Probability, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:55
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:50
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 12:49
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 12:47
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:39
- Re: analysis^, Abstract Dissonance, 12:39
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:37
- Re: Advanced Linear Algebra by Roman, Arturo Magidin, 12:29
- Re: Probability, The Qurqirish Dragon, 12:29
- Re: Easy Reasoning, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:28
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 12:27
- Re: topology-cutting point, Arturo Magidin, 12:25
- Re: Probability, Nick, 12:19
- analysis^, mina_world, 12:19
- Re: diverge 2.., Dave L. Renfro, 12:19
- topology-cutting point, mina_world, 12:14
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Denis Feldmann, 12:06
- Re: Ellipse in a circle continued., Chip Eastham, 12:04
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Aatu Koskensilta, 11:57
- Integral of a modulus?, Ben Young, 11:48
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Abstract Dissonance, 11:40
- Re: Continious and bounded, eugene, 11:37
- Re: An uncountable countable set, briggs, 11:36
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Dave Seaman, 11:31
- Re: Advanced Linear Algebra by Roman, David C . Ullrich, 11:31
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), James Waldby, 11:29
- Re: The mapping f - > f' and it's graph, eugene, 11:26
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 11:19
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 11:17
- box spline, Thao, 11:14
- Re: Probability, Duncan Muirhead, 11:03
- Re: JSH: Matter of order, Tony Orlow, 10:53
- Re: Non-increasing function+inequality, David C . Ullrich, 10:49
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Lee Rudolph, 10:48
- Re: Advanced Linear Algebra by Roman, Robert Low, 10:48
- Re: Advanced Linear Algebra by Roman, David C . Ullrich, 10:44
- Re: SF: Progress, double factorization proven, Ben Young, 10:44
- Re: Continious and bounded, David C . Ullrich, 10:43
- Re: The mapping f - > f' and it's graph, David C . Ullrich, 10:41
- " Solving 1 - f( f(x) / (1 -f(x) ) ) = 1 / (x^2 -2*x +3) , x > 2 ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 10:32
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 10:30
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), Lee Rudolph, 10:26
- Re: Kaplansky, bobovski, 10:22
- Kaplansky, mark . yasuda, 10:19
- Best Fit Line for Exponential Data, draccarlawpet, 10:13
- Re: So where's a vector?, kunzmilan, 10:11
- Re: Probability, Nick, 10:08
- Re: Series Convergence, Rob Johnson, 10:06
- Re: radius of convergence, Patrick Coilland, 10:01
- Re: So where's a vector?, G.E. Ivey, 09:56
- Re: Continious and bounded, José Carlos Santos, 09:51
- Re: radius of convergence, mina_world, 09:50
- Re: diverge 2.., Kostyantyn Yusenko, 09:49
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Denis Feldmann, 09:46
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, phyti, 09:40
- Re: So where's a vector?, kunzmilan, 09:35
- Re: A computation, Han de Bruijn, 09:27
- diverge 2.., mina_world, 09:27
- Re: Heat Conduction, Maury Barbato, 09:22
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), Jürgen Ren, 09:20
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), David W . Cantrell, 09:18
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low, 09:12
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:09
- Re: Continious and bounded, eugene, 09:06
- Re: The mapping f - > f' and it's graph, eugene, 09:04
- Re: diverge..., eugene, 09:02
- Re: diverge..., mina_world, 08:59
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 08:58
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 08:57
- Re: radius of convergence, Patrick Coilland, 08:55
- Re: Continious and bounded, Dave L. Renfro, 08:50
- Re: Heat Conduction, Maury Barbato, 08:49
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, kunzmilan, 08:48
- Re: radius of convergence, mina_world, 08:47
- Re: Continious and bounded, A N Niel, 08:46
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 08:46
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 08:44
- Re: Continious and bounded, Dave L. Renfro, 08:44
- Re: diverge..., Dave L. Renfro, 08:33
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), Dirk Van de moortel, 08:32
- Re: Continious and bounded, William Elliot, 08:31
- Re: Advanced Linear Algebra by Roman, Robert Low, 08:30
- Re: A definite integral, matt271829-news, 08:30
- Re: Continious and bounded, David C . Ullrich, 08:27
- Re: The mapping f - > f' and it's graph, A N Niel, 08:26
- Re: Continious and bounded, David C . Ullrich, 08:25
- Re: The mapping f - > f' and it's graph, David C . Ullrich, 08:23
- Non-increasing function+inequality, eugene, 08:21
- Re: Probability, A N Niel, 08:18
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 08:15
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), G. A. Edgar, 08:13
- Re: right ordered set structure, William Elliot, 08:13
- Re: Continious and bounded, José Carlos Santos, 08:13
- Re: Probability, Dave Seaman, 08:12
- Re: is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, Chip Eastham, 08:12
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1)-, Robert Low, 08:11
- Re: A computation, David C . Ullrich, 08:09
- Re: Continious and bounded, Duncan Muirhead, 08:06
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Robert Low, 08:06
- Re: right ordered set structure, William Elliot, 08:06
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 08:05
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Dave Seaman, 08:02
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), Aatu Koskensilta, 08:01
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1)-, Pubkeybreaker, 08:01
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, jmfbahciv, 08:01
- Re: radius of convergence, Patrick Coilland, 07:59
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 07:52
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 07:46
- Re: diverge..., Jyrki Lahtonen, 07:44
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Denis Feldmann, 07:38
- Re: Survey (Mathematical English), Dirk Van de moortel, 07:35
- Survey (Mathematical English), David C . Ullrich, 07:34
- diverge..., mina_world, 07:20
- Re: Littlewood on taking leave, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 07:17
- Probability, Nick, 07:14
- Skewed Variances, Han de Bruijn, 07:14
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 07:09
- Re: Littlewood on taking leave, donstockbauer, 07:08
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, kunzmilan, 07:02
- Re: Littlewood on taking leave, Han de Bruijn, 07:01
- Littlewood on taking leave, Father Ignatius, 06:58
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, tez_h@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 06:58
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:55
- Re: it is..., mina_world, 06:49
- Advanced Linear Algebra by Roman, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:35
- radius of convergence, mina_world, 06:29
- Re: it is..., William Elliot, 06:25
- Easy Reasoning, e_hobsbawm, 06:25
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Denis Feldmann, 06:24
- Re: right ordered set structure, cbrown, 06:20
- Re: Continious and bounded, William Elliot, 06:16
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Peter Niessen, 06:15
- it is..., mina_world, 06:10
- Continious and bounded, eugene, 05:51
- Re: right ordered set structure, Phil, 05:49
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:46
- Re: right ordered set structure, Phil, 05:40
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Robert Low, 05:32
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:26
- Re: right ordered set structure, cbrown, 05:26
- Re: right ordered set structure, William Elliot, 05:19
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Robert Low, 04:54
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 04:53
- Re: Orbits on rubber sheets, Rod, 04:47
- Problem with LaplaceTransform and InverseLaplaceTransform, aXi, 04:32
- Re: A definite integral, Mate, 04:31
- Re: Orbits on rubber sheets, Han de Bruijn, 04:28
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Aatu Koskensilta, 04:10
- Entropies, kunzmilan, 04:04
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Clifford Nelson, 03:43
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Michael Siemon, 03:42
- Re: Spherical Geometry Problem, Michael Jørgensen, 03:38
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:28
- Re: A computation, Han de Bruijn, 03:19
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:15
- The mapping f - > f' and it's graph, eugene, 03:15
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:13
- Re: partial order on a boolean algebra, wonda, 03:08
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Michael Siemon, 03:01
- Re: partial order on a boolean algebra, wonda, 03:00
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Gib Bogle, 02:59
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 02:57
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 02:55
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 02:50
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Gene Ward Smith, 02:46
- Re: partial order on a boolean algebra, William Elliot, 02:41
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:36
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Gene Ward Smith, 02:25
- Re: a simple question about irreducible affine varieties, Ted Hwa, 02:24
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 02:11
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1)-, The World Wide Wade, 02:06
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 02:01
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, guenther vonKnakspot, 01:59
- Exact homology sequences for the triples of topological spaces (lost in proof), kay, 01:45
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 01:44
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:37
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 01:32
- Re: A definite integral, Michael Jørgensen, 01:31
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 01:09
- a simple question about irreducible affine varieties, canadan, 00:47
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:34
June 26, 2006
- right ordered set structure, Phil, 23:55
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, jay, 23:43
- Re: is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, jt64, 23:31
- Re: partial order on a boolean algebra, Arturo Magidin, 23:06
- Re: is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, Proginoskes, 22:53
- Re: Series Convergence, The World Wide Wade, 22:53
- Defect in Quantum Information Security?, Jack Sarfatti, 22:51
- Re: Heat Conduction, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:48
- Re: Recommended way to relearn math?, David Moran, 22:38
- Re: Recommended Mathematics Dictionary?, Proginoskes, 22:32
- Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, Chip Eastham, 22:20
- Re: partial order on a boolean algebra, William Elliot, 22:12
- Re: Heat Conduction, Abstract Dissonance, 21:58
- Recommended way to relearn math?, Joe Van Dyk, 21:54
- Re: Series Convergence, Gene Ward Smith, 21:45
- Re: partial order on a boolean algebra, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 21:45
- Re: A definite integral, William Elliot, 21:43
- Re: complex numbers, Ken Pledger, 21:43
- Re: partial order on a boolean algebra, Arturo Magidin, 21:37
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Gene Ward Smith, 21:37
- Re: partial order on a boolean algebra, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 21:32
- partial order on a boolean algebra, wonda, 21:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 21:22
- Re: Series Convergence, The World Wide Wade, 21:03
- Re: Heat Conduction, David Moran, 20:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:33
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 20:17
- Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 20:15
- Re: Series Convergence, Abstract Dissonance, 20:13
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Abstract Dissonance, 20:13
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:08
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Gib Bogle, 20:05
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Abstract Dissonance, 20:02
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:01
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 19:57
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Abstract Dissonance, 19:57
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Gib Bogle, 19:55
- Cech Cohomology and Galois Cohomology, Local Field, 19:44
- Re: nilpotent., mina_world, 19:41
- Re: Matrix problem; only brute force?, Chip Eastham, 19:35
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 19:23
- Re: Series Convergence, Gene Ward Smith, 19:12
- Re: complex numbers, Ken Pledger, 19:07
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, mixi . mo, 18:55
- Re: Series Convergence, Ronald Bruck, 18:52
- Re: Series Convergence, The World Wide Wade, 18:50
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Lee Rudolph, 18:46
- Re: SATANIC IGNORAMUSES, THE CHRIST, BLASPHEMY, AND YOU: INTERNET TERRORISTS EXPOSED!! was GOVERNMENT=SATAN, RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI�=CHRIST: ANY QUESTIONS?, Paul Johnson, 18:38
- Re: complex numbers, Bernhard Kraft, 18:32
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx, 18:31
- ? vector with vector entries, Cheng Cosine, 18:29
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Gene Ward Smith, 18:14
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Randy Poe, 18:10
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, guenther vonKnakspot, 18:02
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Lee Rudolph, 18:00
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 17:59
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 17:43
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil, 17:40
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 17:34
- Re: complex numbers, Ken Pledger, 17:30
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, mixi . mo, 17:20
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Abstract Dissonance, 17:20
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 16:56
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Randy Poe, 16:54
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Gene Ward Smith, 16:54
- Re: Cauchy sequence., martin cohen, 16:54
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Abstract Dissonance, 16:45
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Abstract Dissonance, 16:45
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 16:44
- Re: complex numbers, Bernhard Kraft, 16:40
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, guenther vonKnakspot, 16:39
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 16:32
- Re: how to write the integral sign properly? --- A blast from the past, JEMebius, 16:28
- Re: Matrix problem; only brute force?, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 16:17
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, gjedwards, 16:17
- Re: Series Convergence, Gene Ward Smith, 16:15
- Re: Series Convergence, Ioannis, 16:15
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 16:14
- Re: Series Convergence, Gene Ward Smith, 16:14
- Re: Series Convergence, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 16:11
- Re: Matrix problem; only brute force?, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 16:07
- Re: Heat Conduction, Robert Israel, 16:05
- Re: Matrix problem; only brute force?, Chip Eastham, 16:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:03
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, mixi . mo, 16:01
- Re: Matrix problem; only brute force?, Chip Eastham, 15:58
- Re: Series Convergence, bill, 15:56
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Usher73, 15:52
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Robert Low, 15:52
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 15:52
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 15:47
- Re: Series Convergence, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 15:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:46
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:44
- Matrix problem; only brute force?, melanie, 15:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:32
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:29
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:27
- Series Convergence, MR, 15:19
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Abstract Dissonance, 15:17
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 15:16
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Abstract Dissonance, 15:16
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:12
- Re: Homomorphism, Gene Ward Smith, 15:06
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:06
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 15:05
- Re: Matter of order, The Last Danish Pastry, 15:00
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:49
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:39
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 14:39
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Gene Ward Smith, 14:37
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, jt64, 14:35
- Re: A computation, Abstract Dissonance, 14:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:29
- Re: vectors from l_2 and their difference isn't in l_1+uncountable, The World Wide Wade, 14:28
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Karl Ove Hufthammer, 14:26
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 14:22
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 14:22
- Re: A computation, The World Wide Wade, 14:18
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, Usher73, 14:17
- Heat Conduction, Maury Barbato, 14:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:16
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Pubkeybreaker, 14:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:13
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:13
- Re: how to write the integral sign properly?, Peter L. Montgomery, 14:12
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 14:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:05
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 13:56
- Functional PDE with constant coefficients, stefan, 13:55
- Re: A computation, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 13:52
- Re: nilpotent., Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 13:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:48
- Re: gaussian elimination,, Robert Israel, 13:40
- Re: Sociology and Mathematics, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:37
- Re: A computation, M.J.T. Guy, 13:30
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Robert Israel, 13:29
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, matt271829-news, 13:21
- Re: A computation, Patrick Coilland, 13:18
- Re: A computation, The World Wide Wade, 13:12
- Re: What do you call the rank of an abelian group?, Arturo Magidin, 13:04
- Re: What do you call the rank of an abelian group?, Paul Sperry, 12:58
- Gödel and the erotic universe, Mountain Math Software, 12:42
- Re: A computation, José Carlos Santos, 12:21
- Re: A computation, David C . Ullrich, 12:13
- A definite integral, Mate, 12:09
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 12:02
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:53
- Divisors Of Sum Of Previous Rows, Leroy Quet, 11:52
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, David C . Ullrich, 11:42
- A Couple Grid Game(s), Leroy Quet, 11:39
- A computation, José Carlos Santos, 11:37
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, James Dolan, 11:36
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 11:34
- Re: Is bisection or golden ratio section search global optimal or local optimal?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:33
- Re: nilpotent., mina_world, 11:31
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 11:30
- Re: nilpotent., mina_world, 11:27
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 11:22
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 11:19
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 11:13
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:53
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, José Carlos Santos, 10:49
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:49
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low, 10:48
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 10:45
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:42
- Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin, 10:41
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:39
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin, 10:37
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin, 10:34
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low, 10:32
- Re: What do you call the rank of an abelian group?, Arturo Magidin, 10:31
- Many of the mathematic problems posted in this group may be answered!, cisco, 10:30
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:27
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Dave L. Renfro, 10:24
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:20
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:17
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low, 10:15
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, José Carlos Santos, 10:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:07
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), David W . Cantrell, 10:05
- Re: complex numbers, The Qurqirish Dragon, 10:03
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 10:02
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:01
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:59
- Re: gaussian elimination,, Robert Low, 09:56
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 09:54
- Re: What is an integrator with a variable gain, and how to implement in C (Min/Max Limiters and One Frame Delays), Ian Parker, 09:47
- Re: So where's a vector?, Daryl McCullough, 09:45
- Sociology and Mathematics, Abstract Dissonance, 09:37
- Re: Homomorphism, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:36
- Re: how to write the integral sign properly?, G. A. Edgar, 09:35
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, actionintegral, 09:22
- Re: S4/K~S3, José Carlos Santos, 09:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 09:10
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, georgie, 08:56
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Andy Resnick, 08:51
- Re: Orbits on rubber sheets, Han de Bruijn, 08:34
- Re: nilpotent., tamiry, 08:32
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, jmfbahciv, 08:14
- Re: Is bisection or golden ratio section search global optimal or local optimal?, Han de Bruijn, 08:10
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich, 08:08
- Re: nilpotent., eugene, 08:02
- Re: complex numbers, David C . Ullrich, 07:59
- What is an integrator with a variable gain, and how to implement in C (Min/Max Limiters and One Frame Delays), Chris L, 07:55
- Re: Absolutely convergent sets as a definition for real numbers, David C . Ullrich, 07:53
- Re: Orbits on rubber sheets, Han de Bruijn, 07:41
- Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Denis Feldmann, 07:13
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, matt271829-news, 07:08
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, David C . Ullrich, 07:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:05
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, David C . Ullrich, 07:03
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:01
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:53
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:49
- nilpotent., mina_world, 06:47
- What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 06:36
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, matt271829-news, 06:32
- Re: S4/K~S3, Jyrki Lahtonen, 06:32
- Re: vectors from l_2 and their difference isn't in l_1+uncountable, eugene, 06:16
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, José Carlos Santos, 06:12
- Re: need a function, neo, 06:12
- Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Lee Rudolph, 06:11
- Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:54
- Re: vectors from l_2 and their difference isn't in l_1+uncountable, eugene, 05:53
- Re: vectors from l_2 and their difference isn't in l_1+uncountable, eugene, 05:50
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 26, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:38
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, jmfbahciv, 05:31
- Orbits on rubber sheets, Rod, 05:14
- Re: gaussian elimination,, William Elliot, 04:56
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 04:54
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, Tim Peters, 04:51
- Re: complex numbers, Robert Low, 04:47
- Re: complex numbers, José Carlos Santos, 04:32
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, Dylan Sung, 04:25
- Re: What do you call the rank of an abelian group?, Gene Ward Smith, 04:23
- Re: Real Seaworld Picure!, jaime, 04:20
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 03:54
- Re: ODE theory: dividing through by variables, Robert Low, 03:54
- Re: gaussian elimination,, Han de Bruijn, 03:47
- Re: how to write the integral sign properly?, Robert Low, 03:29
- Re: So where's a vector?, Robert Low, 03:23
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 03:03
- Re: So where's a vector?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:00
- Re: gaussian elimination,, Virgil, 02:59
- Re: how to write the integral sign properly?, Pirmin Fix, 02:58
- Re: gaussian elimination,, Robert Israel, 02:52
- Re: gaussian elimination,, Virgil, 02:51
- Re: So where's a vector?, Robert Low, 02:46
- Re: is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, Virgil, 02:45
- Re: how to write the integral sign properly?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 02:41
- Re: is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, Robert Israel, 02:33
- how to write the integral sign properly?, Pirmin Fix, 02:33
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Robert Israel, 02:27
- Re: So where's a vector?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:17
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 02:15
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 02:10
- Re: is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, apc, 01:54
- Re: What do you call the rank of an abelian group?, Paul Sperry, 01:52
- Re: is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, apc, 01:44
- Re: So where's a vector?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 01:38
- Re: So where's a vector?-, Robert Low, 01:35
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 01:21
- gaussian elimination,, vsgdp, 01:07
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 01:04
- Re: ODE theory: dividing through by variables, William Elliot, 00:59
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:52
- Re: ODE theory: dividing through by variables, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 00:40
- ODE theory: dividing through by variables, Kobu, 00:13
- Re: Ellipse through 2 points in a circle., Chip Eastham, 00:06
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, gino, 00:03
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, gino, 00:02
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, gino, 00:00
June 25, 2006
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, gino, 23:56
- Re: Tuesday Sept 11th 2001 CRIME INVESTIGATION, Phlip, 23:38
- Re: Still retired, Virgil, 23:38
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 23:24
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, jay, 23:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 23:21
- Re: Matter of order, Gib Bogle, 23:11
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 23:10
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 23:09
- Re: So where's a vector?, Gib Bogle, 23:07
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 23:07
- Re: preserve a scalar product, Fedor, 22:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 22:53
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 22:51
- Re: complex numbers, Mohab, 22:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 22:44
- Tuesday Sept 11th 2001 CRIME INVESTIGATION, u2r2h, 22:29
- Re: Simplifing MIN and MAX statements, Michael Reed, 22:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 22:24
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 22:04
- Re: scale factor,k, Gerry Myerson, 21:56
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, Randy Poe, 21:40
- Re: grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, John Herman, 21:33
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Keith Ramsay, 21:27
- grid search for global optimum, is there a way to decide stepsize?, gino, 21:22
- Re: So where's a vector?-, JEMebius, 21:13
- complex numbers, Bernhard Kraft, 21:01
- Re: Q -> R in algebra..., Chip Eastham, 20:49
- Re: So where's a vector?, Gib Bogle, 20:48
- Re: Q -> R in algebra..., William Elliot, 20:45
- Re: is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, Chip Eastham, 20:30
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, Tim Peters, 20:24
- Re: Simplifing MIN and MAX statements, William Elliot, 20:18
- Re: please explain the solution., Barry Schwarz, 19:56
- Re: Matter of order, Gene Ward Smith, 19:42
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Gene Ward Smith, 19:32
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Gene Ward Smith, 19:29
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Ioannis, 19:27
- Re: Recommended Mathematics Dictionary?, Ioannis, 19:14
- Re: Matter of order, Mohab, 19:12
- Re: NEWTON WAS WRONG, Robert J. Kolker, 19:11
- Re: P4 polysign product study, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 19:06
- Re: Recommended Mathematics Dictionary?, NotP, 19:00
- Re: is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, Proginoskes, 18:50
- Re: SF: Progress, double factorization proven, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:46
- Re: SF: Progress, double factorization proven, Euler, 18:46
- Re: Recommended Mathematics Dictionary?, Proginoskes, 18:43
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, mixi . mo, 18:31
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Lance, 18:26
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 18:24
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Clifford Nelson, 18:21
- Re: SF: Progress, double factorization proven, jstevh, 18:13
- Trigonometric formulas, Deep, 17:59
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Lee Rudolph, 17:56
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, David Ames, 17:51
- Re: Simplifing MIN and MAX statements, Peter L. Montgomery, 17:49
- Re: NEWTON WAS WRONG, David Ames, 17:45
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Jan Panteltje, 17:35
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ken Pledger, 17:34
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Martin Hogbin, 17:29
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Dave L. Renfro, 17:25
- Re: SF: Progress, double factorization proven, Ben Young, 17:21
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 17:20
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), David W . Cantrell, 17:19
- Re: Matter of order, The Last Danish Pastry, 17:02
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, gino, 16:54
- Re: So where's a vector?, Robert Low, 16:53
- Re: Simplifing MIN and MAX statements, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:53
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Dirk Van de moortel, 16:47
- Re: So where's a vector?, Gib Bogle, 16:42
- Re: need a function, Hugo Pfoertner, 16:39
- Re: So where's a vector?, Robert Low, 16:33
- SATANIC IGNORAMUSES, THE CHRIST, BLASPHEMY, AND YOU: INTERNET TERRORISTS EXPOSED!! was GOVERNMENT=SATAN, RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI©=CHRIST: ANY QUESTIONS?, Raymond Karczewski, 16:30
- Simplifing MIN and MAX statements, Michael Reed, 16:23
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Gene Ward Smith, 16:14
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Dirk Van de moortel, 16:08
- Re: is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, Virgil, 16:01
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Gene Ward Smith, 15:59
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 15:55
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 15:54
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), David W . Cantrell, 15:49
- Re: What do you call the rank of an abelian group?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:48
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 15:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:40
- Re: Absolutely convergent sets as a definition for real numbers, Gene Ward Smith, 15:39
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:39
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:29
- What do you call the rank of an abelian group?, Dror Speiser, 15:28
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), David W . Cantrell, 15:28
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 15:23
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:22
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), David W . Cantrell, 15:21
- Re: f continuous at b, f(b) <> c, Brian M. Scott, 15:07
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Dirk Van de moortel, 15:06
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 15:06
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), matt271829-news, 15:04
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Dirk Van de moortel, 15:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:38
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:32
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, srp, 14:29
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), David W . Cantrell, 14:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:11
- Re: So where's a vector?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 14:06
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), matt271829-news, 14:03
- Re: Need some help with digits..., Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 13:59
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), matt271829-news, 13:58
- Re: Need some help with digits..., Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 13:54
- numerical solution of p-Laplace equation, Graziano, 13:52
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Dirk Van de moortel, 13:52
- Re: Is bisection or golden ratio section search global optimal or local optimal?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:42
- Re: f continuous at b, f(b) <> c, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 13:42
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, matt271829-news, 13:40
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 13:39
- Re: Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, Ray Koopman, 13:28
- Re: complex analysis 2 of 2, The World Wide Wade, 13:24
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1)-, JEMebius, 13:19
- Re: JSH: Matter of order, willo_thewisp, 13:10
- Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress, OwlHoot, 13:10
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Dirk Van de moortel, 13:06
- Re: Is bisection or golden ratio section search global optimal or local optimal?, gino, 13:02
- Is there a way to visualize 4D data?, gino, 12:55
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), David W . Cantrell, 12:48
- Re: HIV antibody testing, Doug Goncz, 12:18
- Re: Cauchy sequence., mina_world, 12:02
- Re: Recommended Mathematics Dictionary?, David R Tribble, 11:38
- Re: mathematics of population dynamics, Rouben Rostamian, 11:03
- mathematics of population dynamics, johnwl4@xxxxxxx, 10:56
- Re: Numbers "next to each other", The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 10:53
- Re: Group theory problem, Derek Holt, 10:48
- Re: Ellipse in a circle continued., Oscar Lanzi III, 10:35
- Re: need a function, neo, 10:10
- need a function, neo, 10:08
- Re: P4 polysign product study, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:07
- Re: S4/K~S3, José Carlos Santos, 10:05
- Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, The Qurqirish Dragon, 09:55
- Re: Cauchy sequence., José Carlos Santos, 09:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 09:41
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Dave L. Renfro, 09:37
- Re: conservative forces and Green plane theorem, David C . Ullrich, 09:10
- Re: Need some help with digits..., Narcoleptic Insomniac, 09:05
- Re: Ellipse in a circle continued., Oscar Lanzi III, 09:02
- Re: So where's a vector?, Lee Rudolph, 08:53
- Re: Matter of order, David Moran, 08:34
- Re: Absolutely convergent sets as a definition for real numbers, David C . Ullrich, 08:34
- Re: So where's a vector?, Lee Rudolph, 08:04
- Re: So where's a vector?, Lee Rudolph, 07:58
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Dirk Van de moortel, 07:54
- Re: So where's a vector?, Robert Low, 07:54
- Re: So where's a vector?, Lee Rudolph, 07:49
- help to understand a proof(something with fenchel's theorem), robert, 07:43
- Re: Q -> R in algebra..., David C . Ullrich, 07:34
- is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, apc, 07:31
- conservative forces and Green plane theorem, tamiry, 07:29
- Re: So where's a vector?, Robert Low, 07:26
- Re: vectors from l_2 and their difference isn't in l_1+uncountable, David C . Ullrich, 07:25
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, David C . Ullrich, 07:21
- Re: JSH: SF: Progress, double factorization proven, Tim Peters, 07:15
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, David C . Ullrich, 06:59
- Cauchy sequence., mina_world, 06:56
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 06:56
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 06:51
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, David C . Ullrich, 06:47
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Dirk Van de moortel, 06:47
- Re: Ellipse in a circle continued., matt271829-news, 06:36
- Re: Recommended Mathematics Dictionary?, eshylay, 06:35
- Re: f continuous at b, f(b) <> c, David C . Ullrich, 06:25
- THE GRAVITON DOESNT EXIST, ACE, 06:08
- Re: Need some help with digits..., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 05:53
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, matt271829-news, 05:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:19
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:06
- Re: Difficult constrained least squares problem, pauldepstein, 05:06
- Absolutely convergent sets as a definition for real numbers, Gene Ward Smith, 05:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:01
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), jt64, 04:58
- Re: Difficult constrained least squares problem, pauldepstein, 04:53
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 04:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 04:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 04:35
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 04:27
- Re: So where's a vector?, Robert Low, 04:10
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 04:04
- Re: So where's a vector?, ben, 03:57
- Re: So where's a vector?, ben, 03:49
- Re: scale factor,k, karl, 03:40
- Re: Numbers "next to each other", Robert Low, 03:39
- Re: scale factor,k, hiiyuhee, 03:36
- Re: So where's a vector?, Robert Low, 03:32
- Re: So where's a vector?, ben, 03:29
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 03:19
- Re: So where's a vector?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:52
- Re: Spherical Geometry Problem, Mike, 02:25
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 02:21
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:12
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:03
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 01:42
- Re: Recommended Mathematics Dictionary?, vsgdp, 01:38
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Gerry Myerson, 01:18
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Gerry Myerson, 01:11
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 01:10
- Re: Group theory problem, Ted Hwa, 00:50
- Re: f continuous at b, f(b) <> c, Brian M. Scott, 00:37
- Re: f continuous at b, f(b) <> c, Ronald Bruck, 00:19
- Group theory problem, adomplayer, 00:18
- Re: question on nonstandard normal distributions, Keith Ramsay, 00:02
June 24, 2006
- Re: f continuous at b, f(b) <> c, Virgil, 23:57
- Re: What is your preferred definition of "scalar", Gene Ward Smith, 23:54
- Re: Q -> R in algebra..., Chip Eastham, 23:48
- Re: Q -> R in algebra..., Gene Ward Smith, 23:41
- Q -> R in algebra..., mina_world, 23:36
- Re: question on nonstandard normal distributions, rtonyreeder, 23:29
- Re: f continuous at b, f(b) <> c, R. Colacitti, 22:58
- f continuous at b, f(b) <> c, wwromeo, 22:55
- Re: Definition of limit involving vector pairs, The World Wide Wade, 22:54
- Re: Matter of order, Mohab, 22:25
- Spherical Geometry Problem, jecottrell, 22:20
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 21:55
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 21:51
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 21:51
- Re: Difficult constrained least squares problem, Virgil, 21:47
- JSH: Matter of order, jstevh, 21:41
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler test of new idea, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:35
- question on nonstandard normal distributions, Eli Luong, 21:15
- Re: So where's a vector?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 21:08
- Re: complex analysis 2 of 2, mina_world, 20:58
- Re: So where's a vector?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:51
- Re: So where's a vector?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:46
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 20:30
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 20:29
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 20:25
- S4/K~S3, mina_world, 20:23
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 20:19
- Difficult constrained least squares problem, pauldepstein, 20:18
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 20:16
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 20:15
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 20:14
- Re: Numbers "next to each other", The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 20:11
- Re: Definition of limit involving vector pairs, mameha, 19:54
- Re: So where's a vector?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:54
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Mike Kelly, 19:52
- Recommended Mathematics Dictionary?, John, 19:21
- Much more simple ?, Roman B. Binder, 19:21
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler test of new idea, Proginoskes, 19:21
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, Dylan Sung, 19:19
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, Proginoskes, 19:18
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 19:13
- Re: Definition of limit involving vector pairs, W. Dale Hall, 19:12
- Re: So where's a vector?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:08
- Re: So where's a vector?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:06
- Ellipse in a circle continued., bandasanders, 19:05
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:57
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:54
- Re: Need some help with digits..., ytyourclothes, 18:37
- Re: What is your preferred definition of "scalar", Peter L. Montgomery, 18:32
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 18:28
- Re: Need some help with digits..., ytyourclothes, 18:23
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:22
- Re: Numbers "next to each other", Robert J. Kolker, 18:19
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 18:16
- Re: So where's a vector?, Robert Low, 18:13
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 18:11
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 18:00
- Re: So where's a vector?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 17:59
- Re: So where's a vector?, Lee Rudolph, 17:57
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 17:56
- Re: What is your preferred definition of "scalar", Robert Low, 17:50
- Re: Numbers "next to each other", Robert Low, 17:45
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Dave Seaman, 17:44
- multiplication operator ?, Fedor, 17:41
- Re: So where's a vector?, Robert Low, 17:35
- OOYHAA - Search your favorite audio blogcasts, ooyhaa, 17:33
- Re: So where's a vector?, Robert Low, 17:33
- OOYHAA - Search your favorite audio blogcasts, ooyhaa, 17:33
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 17:27
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 17:26
- Re: So where's a vector?, Gib Bogle, 17:23
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 17:23
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 17:17
- Re: Definition of limit involving vector pairs, mameha, 17:15
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 17:12
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 17:10
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 17:08
- characteristic polynom & diagonal members, tamiry, 16:58
- Re: What is your preferred definition of "scalar", Mike, 16:49
- Re: vectors from l_2 and their difference isn't in l_1+uncountable, The World Wide Wade, 16:39
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Virgil, 16:11
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 15:55
- Re: What is your preferred definition of "scalar", Virgil, 15:50
- Re: So where's a vector?, Virgil, 15:44
- Re: So where's a vector?, Robert Low, 15:44
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), N. Silver, 15:43
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Peter L. Montgomery, 15:32
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), matt271829-news, 15:22
- Re: What is your preferred definition of "scalar", Dave Seaman, 15:20
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:17
- Re: Definition of limit involving vector pairs, W. Dale Hall, 15:16
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 15:16
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 15:11
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:11
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 15:04
- Re: So where's a vector?, Lee Rudolph, 15:03
- So where's a vector?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 14:53
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:49
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:42
- Re: Why I think that pure disorder is trivial, RadicalLibertarian, 14:37
- Re: Why I think that pure disorder is trivial, RadicalLibertarian, 14:37
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:31
- Re: Why I think that pure disorder is trivial, tikidreq, 14:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:20
- Re: What is your preferred definition of "scalar", Hatto von Aquitanien, 14:18
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:14
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:03
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:59
- Re: An ancient sudoku, hagen, 13:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:54
- Re: Definition of limit involving vector pairs, mameha, 13:50
- Re: What is your preferred definition of "scalar", Virgil, 13:42
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, mixi . mo, 13:38
- Re: Numbers "next to each other", C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:29
- Re: Numbers "next to each other", The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 13:03
- Re: uncountabe collection of subsets of N, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:51
- Re: descartes folium, tamiry, 12:48
- Re: uncountabe collection of subsets of N, Peter Webb, 12:46
- Re: Numbers "next to each other", The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 12:37
- Re: Numbers "next to each other", Robert Low, 12:36
- Why I think that pure disorder is trivial, RadicalLibertarian, 12:35
- re: Back From The Future, Jack Sarfatti, 12:31
- Re: Numbers "next to each other", Mike Kelly, 12:30
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:15
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 12:14
- Re: HIV antibody testing, Doug Goncz, 11:58
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:52
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:49
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler test of new idea, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:44
- Re: Numbers "next to each other", The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 11:40
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Jiri Slaby, 11:19
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 11:01
- Re: What is your preferred definition of "scalar", David C . Ullrich, 10:58
- Re: Definition of limit involving vector pairs, David C . Ullrich, 10:57
- Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, mina_world, 10:56
- Re: Numbers "next to each other", Robert Low, 10:55
- Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, mina_world, 10:55
- Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, David C . Ullrich, 10:50
- Re: analysis!!, mina_world, 10:49
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, David C . Ullrich, 10:48
- Numbers "next to each other", The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 10:47
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, hale, 10:41
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 10:39
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 10:35
- Re: hello, Jeremy Boden, 10:33
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 10:30
- Re: What is your preferred definition of "scalar", Toni Lassila, 10:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 10:14
- Re: What is your preferred definition of "scalar", Dirk Van de moortel, 10:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 10:07
- Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, The Qurqirish Dragon, 10:05
- What is your preferred definition of "scalar", Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:04
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:44
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Dirk Van de moortel, 09:36
- Definition of limit involving vector pairs, mameha, 09:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 09:30
- Re: JSH: SF: Full solution?, Tim Peters, 09:29
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), N. Silver, 09:29
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:28
- limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), Jiri Slaby, 09:27
- Re: limit(ln(x+sqrt(x^2+1)),x=-infinity), matt271829-news, 09:23
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:19
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab, 09:12
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:08
- Re: splines, pkg, 09:03
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:02
- Re: splines, pkg, 09:02
- Re: splines, pkg, 09:01
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:00
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:59
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:53
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:49
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:47
- Re: uncountabe collection of subsets of N, Fedor, 08:46
- Re: S_4 group, Timothy Murphy, 08:33
- Re: vectors from l_2 and their difference isn't in l_1+uncountable, David C . Ullrich, 08:24
- Re: Convex functions properties, David C . Ullrich, 08:07
- Re: S_4 group, David C . Ullrich, 08:02
- Re: S_4 group, David C . Ullrich, 08:00
- Re: S_4 group, David C . Ullrich, 07:59
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 07:57
- Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David C . Ullrich, 07:55
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, David C . Ullrich, 07:53
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 07:49
- hello, soltane.shab, 07:47
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 07:45
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 07:24
- Gaussian Curvature, cfgauss, 07:21
- Re: HIV antibody testing, Doug Goncz, 07:17
- Re: descartes folium, The Last Danish Pastry, 07:00
- descartes folium, tamiry, 06:18
- splines, pkg, 06:15
- Re: JSH: SF: Full solution?, Tim Peters, 06:14
- Re: uncountabe collection of subsets of N, eugene, 05:50
- Re: S_4 group, Jim Heckman, 05:35
- Re: uncountabe collection of subsets of N, Butch Malahide, 05:30
- Re: uncountabe collection of subsets of N, Patrick Coilland, 05:17
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 05:17
- dynamic lever by dedanoe, dedanoe, 04:57
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, Tim Peters, 04:12
- Re: Best formula, José Carlos Santos, 03:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 03:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 03:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 03:51
- Re: uncountabe collection of subsets of N, Virgil, 03:47
- Re: scale factor,k, karl, 03:35
- Re: uncountabe collection of subsets of N, Mike, 03:34
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, Dylan Sung, 03:32
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:24
- scale factor,k, hiiyuhee, 03:21
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 03:12
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:04
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 02:57
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:56
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler test of new idea, Tim Peters, 02:55
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:53
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler test of new idea, Tim Peters, 02:31
- uncountabe collection of subsets of N, eugene, 02:29
- Re: notation limitation for rational, William Elliot, 01:34
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 01:33
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, Proginoskes, 00:56
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Gottfried Helms, 00:56
- Re: Ellipse through 2 points in a circle., Virgil, 00:50
- Re: what is a DISCRETE STRUCTURE?, Proginoskes, 00:45
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Gottfried Helms, 00:43
- Math packages which fit curves, Brablo, 00:36
- What's the correlation between R^2 and Standard Deviation?, Brablo, 00:28
- what is a DISCRETE STRUCTURE?, lite . on . beta, 00:26
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, tbonepower07, 00:26
- Re: Sorry, rubbush ACII diagram, Proginoskes, 00:25
- Re: Sorry, rubbush ACII diagram, William Elliot, 00:23
- Re: sin cos tan help, Proginoskes, 00:21
- Take this IQ test, Mr . Coolmaster, 00:16
- Ellipse through 2 points in a circle., bandasanders, 00:10
June 23, 2006
- Re: Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), Dale Shoults, 23:35
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 23:07
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 23:06
- Re: P4 polysign product study, Spoonfed, 22:40
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 21:42
- Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", Robert Israel, 21:41
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 21:31
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:16
- The sort of people that read the Guardian, dearcilla, 21:13
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:50
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:31
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 20:23
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:15
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, jstevh, 20:05
- Re: probability estimates for a bird flu pandemic, Robert Israel, 20:05
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:00
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Richard Tobin, 19:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dann Corbit, 19:50
- Re: notation limitation for rational, zxcv_890, 19:48
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dann Corbit, 19:44
- Re: How to solve linear equation with linear constraints, Robert Israel, 19:40
- HIV antibody testing, Doug Goncz, 19:37
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:36
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 19:35
- Re: Knots in continuous curves, James Dolan, 19:33
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 19:30
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, IEJ, 19:30
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Robert Low, 19:29
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news, 19:17
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:12
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:11
- Re: Describing an Operation of Two Ordered Sets, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:11
- Re: Why you people are NOT pure, litsohate, 18:55
- vectors from l_2 and their difference isn't in l_1+uncountable, eugene, 18:52
- Re: Why you people are NOT pure, litsohate, 18:52
- Re: fractional part of the function at integer points+concave, eugene, 18:46
- Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 18:41
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 18:34
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:31
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 18:30
- Re: Another probability question, Zerex71, 18:28
- Re: Another probability question, Zerex71, 18:24
- Re: Another probability question, Zerex71, 18:21
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 18:17
- Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, Christopher J. Henrich, 18:14
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 18:01
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:00
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab, 17:56
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Tom Smith, 17:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Richard Tobin, 17:45
- Re: Another probability question, Randy Poe, 17:44
- Re: Another probability question, Randy Poe, 17:41
- Re: Another probability question, Randy Poe, 17:35
- Re: Knots in continuous curves, Robert Israel, 17:30
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 17:28
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Gottfried Helms, 17:27
- Re: Is bisection or golden ratio section search global optimal or local optimal?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 17:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 17:18
- Re: Brownian motion and second category; Was: : Knots in continuous curves, Robert Israel, 17:17
- Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David Grieve, 17:13
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab, 17:08
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 17:07
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab, 17:07
- Re: Hilbert 16th Problem, Ali Taghavi, 17:05
- Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, Ioannis, 17:02
- Re: Another probability question, Zerex71, 17:02
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 17:01
- Re: Best formula, Ray Koopman, 17:01
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, ##minty, 16:56
- Re: Best formula, Virgil, 16:54
- Re: Another probability question, Zerex71, 16:54
- Re: Best formula, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:54
- Re: Another probability question, Zerex71, 16:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 16:47
- Re: Best formula, José Carlos Santos, 16:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 16:39
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, mixi . mo, 16:36
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Tom Smith, 16:32
- Re: Another probability question, Randy Poe, 16:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 16:28
- Re: analysis!!, david petry, 16:23
- Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, martin cohen, 16:23
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 16:17
- Re: Knots in continuous curves, Lee Rudolph, 16:15
- Upper bound for an interesting series? (application of 3^n - 2^s), Gottfried Helms, 16:05
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, Dave L. Renfro, 16:04
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Russell, 16:03
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Tom Smith, 16:03
- Re: Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), Virgil, 16:01
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Tom Smith, 16:01
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, Dave L. Renfro, 15:57
- Re: metric space, compactness, Robert Israel, 15:56
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, IEJ, 15:51
- Re: Knots in continuous curves, Robert Israel, 15:51
- a file of Fermat psp(5)s up to 10^12 or higher?, hanrahan398, 15:43
- Re: Brownian motion and second category; Was: : Knots in continuous curves, Dave L. Renfro, 15:41
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, GARY, 15:37
- Re: Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), stush, 15:32
- Re: Best formula, Virgil, 15:26
- Re: Brownian motion and second category; Was: : Knots in continuous curves, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:18
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Russell, 15:15
- Re: Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), Peter L. Montgomery, 15:15
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, kenney, 15:13
- Re: Another probability question, Zerex71, 15:06
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:02
- Re: Another probability question, Zerex71, 14:59
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:52
- Re: Brownian motion and second category; Was: : Knots in continuous curves, Robert Israel, 14:51
- Re: metric space, compactness, The World Wide Wade, 14:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:42
- Re: Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:41
- Re: Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), Pious Audio, 14:41
- Re: fractional part of the function at integer points+concave, The World Wide Wade, 14:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:33
- Re: Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:30
- Re: How to solve linear equation with linear constraints, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:29
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab, 14:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:23
- Re: Another probability question, Zerex71, 14:22
- Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, Ben Young, 14:19
- Re: Brownian motion and second category; Was: : Knots in continuous curves, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:12
- Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, The World Wide Wade, 14:09
- Re: metric space, compactness, alex kim, 14:09
- Re: Is bisection or golden ratio section search global optimal or local optimal?, martin cohen, 14:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:01
- Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", G. A. Edgar, 13:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dann Corbit, 13:52
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, IE J, 13:51
- Re: Another probability question, Randy Poe, 13:51
- Re: fractional part of the function at integer points+concave, eugene, 13:50
- Re: Another probability question, Randy Poe, 13:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:42
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, matt271829-news, 13:41
- Re: complex analysis 2 of 2, The World Wide Wade, 13:41
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 13:35
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:34
- Another probability question, Zerex71, 13:32
- analysis!!, mina_world, 13:30
- Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), Pious Audio, 13:28
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 13:25
- Need Research Help On Socially Applied Mathematics., jamacrae1, 13:22
- Re: fractional part of the function at integer points+concave, M.J.T. Guy, 13:18
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, Tom McDonald, 13:17
- Convex functions properties, eugene, 13:16
- Re: Is this a lattice?, Marc Olschok, 13:04
- Re: S_4 group, Chip Eastham, 12:56
- Re: How to solve linear equation with linear constraints, Randy Poe, 12:46
- Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", Patrick Coilland, 12:31
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:28
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:23
- Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, mina_world, 12:23
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:20
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:17
- Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 12:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 12:14
- Best formula, José Carlos Santos, 12:11
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Tom, 12:01
- Re: Sorry, rubbush ACII diagram, David, 12:00
- Re: S_4 group, Arturo Magidin, 11:48
- Re: How to solve linear equation with linear constraints, Toni Lassila, 11:47
- Re: Is bisection or golden ratio section search global optimal or local optimal?, gino, 11:44
- Re: S_4 group, José Carlos Santos, 11:44
- Re: S_4 group, David C . Ullrich, 11:37
- Re: S_4 group, David C . Ullrich, 11:35
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), Dave L. Renfro, 11:35
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, Dave L. Renfro, 11:32
- Re: sin cos tan help, Dave L. Renfro, 11:30
- Re: Brownian motion and second category; Was: : Knots in continuous curves, Dave L. Renfro, 11:29
- Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, David C . Ullrich, 11:26
- Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, David C . Ullrich, 11:26
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Puppet_Sock, 11:23
- Re: Knots in continuous curves, James Dolan, 11:22
- Re: How to solve linear equation with linear constraints, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:22
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 10:49
- Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, The Qurqirish Dragon, 10:48
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), The Qurqirish Dragon, 10:44
- Re: That would be really cool, Han de Bruijn, 10:24
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, The Qurqirish Dragon, 10:19
- Re: Are you intelligent or a dreaded fool?, Han de Bruijn, 10:18
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 10:18
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Justin, 10:17
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow, 10:14
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, The Qurqirish Dragon, 10:08
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Robert Low, 10:07
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow, 10:06
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 10:04
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab, 09:58
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Larry Lard, 09:56
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab, 09:55
- Re: new question, Martin, 09:53
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, tamiry, 09:53
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Robert Low, 09:51
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 09:49
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Iamaskingu, 09:48
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Robert Low, 09:47
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab, 09:43
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 09:41
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, ss54, 09:41
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 09:39
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:38
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab, 09:37
- Are you intelligent or a dreaded fool?, Mr.Cools, 09:31
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Robert Low, 09:25
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, Larry Lard, 09:24
- Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", G. A. Edgar, 09:24
- Re: That would be really cool, Robert Low, 09:15
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 09:08
- Re: Equalizer in the category of rings, Jannick Asmus, 09:06
- NEWTON WAS WRONG, ACE, 09:06
- Re: S_4 group, José Carlos Santos, 09:02
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, William Elliot, 09:00
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 08:57
- S_4 group, mina_world, 08:52
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 08:50
- Re: Differential form on Riemann Sphere, Timothy Murphy, 08:47
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, mixi . mo, 08:41
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, tamiry, 08:40
- Re: Simple versus formal proof?, William Elliot, 08:38
- Re: Why you people are NOT pure, Faruq Qutaybah, 08:38
- Re: Knots in continuous curves, Robert Low, 08:37
- That would be really cool, Han de Bruijn, 08:34
- Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David C . Ullrich, 08:07
- Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 08:01
- Re: Sorry, rubbush ACII diagram, William Elliot, 07:54
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), Richard Tobin, 07:48
- Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David C . Ullrich, 07:39
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Larry Lard, 07:16
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, kenney, 07:15
- Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", Duncan Muirhead, 07:09
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Lee Rudolph, 07:07
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 06:58
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, Tim Peters, 06:42
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 06:40
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Ryan Reich, 06:40
- Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", Patrick Coilland, 06:39
- complex analysis 2 of 2, mina_world, 06:13
- complex analysis 1 of 2, mina_world, 06:08
- Re: analysis !, mina_world, 05:46
- " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 05:41
- fractional part of the function at integer points+concave, eugene, 05:35
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Tom, 05:17
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Michael Jørgensen, 05:16
- probability estimates for a bird flu pandemic, guenter, 05:16
- Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), David Bernier, 04:54
- Re: Is bisection or golden ratio section search global optimal or local optimal?, Han de Bruijn, 04:53
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Han de Bruijn, 04:52
- Re: Is this a lattice?, Lee Rudolph, 04:27
- Re: Computing a series, csimon, 04:20
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Gene Ward Smith, 04:15
- Re: Is this a lattice?, Gene Ward Smith, 04:09
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Michael Jørgensen, 04:07
- Re: How to solve linear equation with linear constraints, Michael Jørgensen, 03:58
- Re: Integration Book Rec., Badger, 03:56
- Sorry, rubbush ACII diagram, David, 03:50
- Is this a lattice?, David, 03:47
- Is bisection or golden ratio section search global optimal or local optimal?, gino, 03:43
- Re: new question, mij, 03:39
- How to solve linear equation with linear constraints, hmobahi, 03:21
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, fishfry, 03:12
- Brownian motion and second category; Was: : Knots in continuous curves, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 03:05
- Re: Why you people are NOT pure, Denis Feldmann, 03:02
- Re: metric space, compactness, Robert Israel, 02:45
- Re: metric space, compactness, José Carlos Santos, 02:42
- Re: Why you people are NOT pure, Net Nanny, 02:41
- Re: Knots in continuous curves, Robert Israel, 02:38
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, Bob Terwilliger, 02:35
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, José Carlos Santos, 02:23
- Re: LaTeX on Linux, andymorrison549, 02:22
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Gottfried Helms, 02:21
- Re: Overview of fields of mathematics, Robert Israel, 02:14
- Re: SF: Simpler test of new idea, José Carlos Santos, 02:09
- Re: Parity of Sum of Binomial Coefficients., googleposter226, 02:09
- Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, Net Nanny, 01:54
- Re: metric space, compactness, Mike, 01:44
- Re: An easy matrix quals problem, Robert Israel, 01:40
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), Virgil, 01:38
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Virgil, 01:30
- Re: An easy matrix quals problem, Peter L. Montgomery, 01:15
- JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, jstevh, 01:12
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 01:08
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Gottfried Helms, 00:57
- Re: Number Theory, Gerry Myerson, 00:57
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:56
- re:CRITICAL TORUS !!!, !bianko, 00:55
- re:Question about solution to a initial value problem with a Dirac delta function, !bianko, 00:55
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Faruq Qutaybah, 00:46
- Re: LaTeX on Linux, Ronald Bruck, 00:20
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, Gene Ward Smith, 00:16
- metric space, compactness, alex kim, 00:10
- Re: 19721972....., Tim Peters, 00:06
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), Paul, 00:04
June 22, 2006
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), William Elliot, 23:47
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 23:46
- how to maximize a piecewise function, erkutsonmez, 23:43
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, shepherdmoon, 23:43
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:43
- Re: Expansion of Factorial of a Fraction, William Elliot, 23:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 23:37
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 23:34
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), shepherdmoon, 23:33
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, William Elliot, 23:32
- Re: notation limitation for rational, William Elliot, 23:23
- Re: Number Theory, Brendan O'Sullivan, 23:22
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), Paul, 23:07
- Re: Help needed with lattices, William Elliot, 23:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 23:03
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Iamaskingu, 22:52
- Knots in continuous curves, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:49
- Re: Linear Regression with occasional out-of-range data, Jack, 22:49
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 22:46
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:44
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), ADM, 22:42
- Re: bayes theory -- matrix variates, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:32
- Differentiation, limits, and differentials, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:27
- Re: Integration Book Rec., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 22:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 22:24
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 22:07
- Re: 19721972....., Robert Israel, 21:51
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 21:34
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 21:29
- Re: Shannon's "well known" result, Gerry Myerson, 21:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 21:25
- Re: sin cos tan help, Gerry Myerson, 21:20
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Gerry Myerson, 21:15
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 21:13
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Faruq Qutaybah, 21:09
- notation limitation for rational, zxcv_890, 21:09
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 21:09
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:00
- Re: Number Theory, Gerry Myerson, 20:58
- Re: Number Theory, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:54
- Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Gerry Myerson, 20:53
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Ryan Reich, 20:53
- Re: Number Theory, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:52
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Lee Rudolph, 20:51
- Re: Integration Book Rec., Ken Pledger, 20:34
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:31
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), The World Wide Wade, 20:22
- Re: JSH: Still retired, Euler, 20:16
- Re: A trigonometric equation, Deep, 20:14
- Re: Hamming codes, hoz, 20:13
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 20:00
- Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, ss54, 19:59
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 19:56
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 19:53
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 19:52
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 19:52
- Re: LaTeX on Linux, Rouben Rostamian, 19:52
- Re: Number Theory, Brendan O'Sullivan, 19:50
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 19:48
- Number Theory, Brendan O'Sullivan, 19:46
- bayes theory -- matrix variates, Roy, 19:45
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 19:38
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 19:36
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 19:35
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 19:30
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 19:28
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 19:22
- Re: sin cos tan help, Proginoskes, 19:06
- Integration Book Rec., Charlie Johnson, 19:04
- Re: Describing an Operation of Two Ordered Sets, Aloha Kakuikanu, 19:03
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 18:59
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 18:44
- Re: Describing an Operation of Two Ordered Sets, Aloha Kakuikanu, 18:28
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:27
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, mensanator@xxxxxxx, 18:25
- Re: Hamming codes, jeffconner50, 18:23
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, matt271829-news, 18:22
- Re: hypercube puzzle, The Last Danish Pastry, 18:21
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), matt271829-news, 18:06
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), Mike Kelly, 18:05
- How big is a "selfridge"? (primality testing) And is BPSW fastest for general nos?, johnnagelson, 18:04
- Re: Why is Integrate[Sin[x],{x,0,pi}] a whole number????, Ryan Reich, 18:03
- Re: Hamming codes, perhje, 17:56
- Re: Why is Integrate[Sin[x],{x,0,pi}] a whole number????, JShrager@xxxxxxxxx, 17:52
- Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), Faruq Qutaybah, 17:47
- Fractions for .999... (aka 1), shepherdmoon, 17:43
- Online Graphing Calculator, robby . walker, 17:43
- Re: LaTeX on Linux, andymorrison549, 17:41
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Toni Lassila, 17:37
- Re: Hamming codes, Faruq Qutaybah, 17:34
- Re: Why is Integrate[Sin[x],{x,0,pi}] a whole number????, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:32
- Re: Why is Integrate[Sin[x],{x,0,pi}] a whole number????, Ryan Reich, 17:32
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Peter Niessen, 17:25
- Re: Why is Integrate[Sin[x],{x,0,pi}] a whole number????, Rob Pratt, 17:24
- Re: Why is Integrate[Sin[x],{x,0,pi}] a whole number????, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 17:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:12
- Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David Grieve, 17:07
- Why is Integrate[Sin[x],{x,0,pi}] a whole number????, JShrager@xxxxxxxxx, 17:05
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:59
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:57
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:52
- Re: A trigonometric equation, Robert Israel, 16:52
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 16:42
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Chip Eastham, 16:41
- Re: geometry puzzle, Ioannis, 16:36
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, cbrown, 16:18
- Re: LaTeX on Linux, Rouben Rostamian, 16:04
- Re: Describing an Operation of Two Ordered Sets, stush, 16:02
- Codes and Symndromes, jeffconner50, 15:59
- Hamming codes, jeffconner50, 15:56
- Re: Differential form on Riemann Sphere, Lee Rudolph, 15:42
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:33
- Re: geometry puzzle, bert, 15:32
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:27
- Differential form on Riemann Sphere, James, 15:26
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Virgil, 15:24
- hypercube puzzle, Parasyke, 15:18
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Jens Kruse Andersen, 15:14
- Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Virgil, 15:10
- geometry puzzle, Parasyke, 15:07
- Re: LaTeX on Linux, Ronald Bruck, 15:01
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Snis Pilbor, 14:58
- Re: typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, ##minty, 14:51
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, bill, 14:41
- Re: Using my analysis, here are 4 under-valued stocks..., BrunoR, 14:34
- Re: Linear Regression with occasional out-of-range data, pisz_na . mirek, 14:05
- typographic symbols, geometry, maths puzzle, mixi . mo, 13:54
- Re: Measure and Topology, G. A. Edgar, 13:53
- Re: Are you intelligent?, Tony Orlow, 13:39
- Re: Overview of fields of mathematics, Gene Ward Smith, 13:37
- Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow, 13:37
- Measure and Topology, kkilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 13:28
- Re: Linear Regression with occasional out-of-range data, Eric B, 13:28
- Overview of fields of mathematics, Spice Malenge, 13:26
- Re: union convex set is not convex, Marc Olschok, 13:25
- Re: Are you intelligent?, martin cohen, 13:23
- Re: Using my analysis, here are 4 under-valued stocks..., draccarlawpet, 13:18
- Help needed with lattices, David, 13:10
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:57
- How to decompose this formula, yezi, 12:45
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, Keith A. Lewis, 12:43
- Re: Linear Regression with occasional out-of-range data, Duncan Muirhead, 12:39
- Re: new question, Martin, 12:37
- Re: Describing an Operation of Two Ordered Sets, Dave L. Renfro, 12:34
- Re: Describing an Operation of Two Ordered Sets, Arturo Magidin, 12:29
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 12:22
- Re: Simple proof of FLT ?, Roman B. Binder, 12:22
- Describing an Operation of Two Ordered Sets, gundalav, 12:15
- Re: Expansion of Factorial of a Fraction, Ioannis, 11:45
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Pubkeybreaker, 11:42
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Pubkeybreaker, 11:39
- Re: Galois group of primitive 5th root of unity, Arturo Magidin, 11:36
- Re: new question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:33
- Re: Expansion of Factorial of a Fraction, Denis Feldmann, 11:33
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Dave L. Renfro, 11:32
- varimax rotation software, Mike - EMAIL IGNORED, 11:28
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, Wayne Brown, 11:24
- Galois group of primitive 5th root of unity, nullgraph, 11:23
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:07
- Re: sin cos tan help, Dave L. Renfro, 11:06
- Re: Expansion of Factorial of a Fraction, Jonathan Cass, 11:06
- Expansion of Factorial of a Fraction, Jonas, 11:02
- Re: P4 polysign product study, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:43
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, Dan, 10:35
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Dave L. Renfro, 10:33
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 10:29
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 10:26
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 10:21
- Re: Using my analysis, here are 4 under-valued stocks..., BrunoR, 10:11
- Re: new question, Martin, 10:11
- Re: sin cos tan help, Paul, 10:09
- Re: LaTeX on Linux, A N Niel, 10:09
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 10:09
- Re: Using my analysis, here are 4 under-valued stocks..., draccarlawpet, 09:58
- Name for a line parallel to an axis?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:53
- Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Pubkeybreaker, 09:51
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 09:48
- LaTeX on Linux, andymorrison549, 09:29
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 09:23
- What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Iamaskingu, 09:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 09:21
- Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David C . Ullrich, 09:20
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 09:19
- Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David C . Ullrich, 09:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 09:15
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, Jeremy Boden, 09:09
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:01
- Re: sin cos tan help, David Moran, 08:59
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, David C . Ullrich, 08:58
- Re: Functional calculus question, David C . Ullrich, 08:53
- Re: Are you intelligent?, David Moran, 08:50
- Are you intelligent?, Mr . Coolmaster, 08:42
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Chip Eastham, 08:34
- Re: One is a Unit?, Dave Seaman, 08:13
- Re: new question, Michael Jørgensen, 08:05
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Toni Lassila, 08:00
- Equalizer in the category of rings, Jose Capco, 07:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:47
- Re: A trigonometric equation, Deep, 07:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 07:22
- Re: Closed and bounded - clarification, Chip Eastham, 07:09
- Re: infinite product, Denis Feldmann, 07:03
- Re: union convex set is not convex, Ismail, 06:52
- analysis !, mina_world, 06:49
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 06:39
- Re: infinite product, Michael Jørgensen, 06:36
- Re: infinite product, Denis Feldmann, 06:05
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, Tim Peters, 06:01
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 05:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 05:43
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:43
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, William Elliot, 05:41
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:37
- An easy matrix quals problem, Ken Honda, 05:28
- Re: infinite product, Michael Jørgensen, 05:11
- Re: Even more tensor trouble, Hauke Reddmann, 05:07
- infinite product, Michael Jørgensen, 05:00
- Bezier track path with inversions, DJ Wiza, 04:58
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 04:51
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, Patrick Coilland, 04:47
- Re: Closed and bounded - clarification, Guy Corrigall, 04:45
- Re: One is a Unit?, Robert Israel, 04:40
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, eugene, 04:38
- Re: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, José Carlos Santos, 04:30
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Derek Holt, 04:29
- Complex Structure of R^2 in Differential Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 04:22
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, Patrick Coilland, 04:19
- Re: How many finite geometries are there on n points? Or is there at least, dtmackenzie, 04:09
- Re:[topic not modified] : f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, Patrick Coilland, 04:05
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 04:04
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, Robert Israel, 03:55
- Re: JSH: Still retired, Tim Peters, 03:55
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, Robert Israel, 03:51
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 03:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 03:22
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, eugene, 03:18
- Re: matrix functions, Gottfried Helms, 03:14
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 03:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 03:08
- Re[topic modified] : f(f(x)) = f(x) + a , f - derivable, Patrick Coilland, 03:03
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, Virgil, 02:52
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, Robert Israel, 02:46
- Re: sin cos tan help, Proginoskes, 02:44
- Re: sin cos tan help, Proginoskes, 02:40
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 02:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 02:35
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 02:24
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 02:23
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 02:19
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, eugene, 02:15
- Re: 19721972....., Tim Peters, 01:59
- Re: sin cos tan help, Mike, 01:58
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, doki_pen, 01:52
- Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 01:49
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Toni Lassila, 01:45
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 01:43
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 01:38
- Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Konrad Viltersten, 01:33
- Re: 19721972....., Spice Malenge, 01:32
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 01:00
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates, 00:58
- Re: Find all solutions, hayk, 00:54
- Re: irreducible polynomial, mina_world, 00:52
- 19721972....., hayk, 00:49
- Re: sin cos tan help, Paul, 00:34
- Re: Closed and bounded - clarification, Chip Eastham, 00:30
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, hale, 00:29
June 21, 2006
- Re: matrix functions, Robert Israel, 23:56
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 23:51
- Re: sin cos tan help, dcorbit, 23:46
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 23:43
- Re: new question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 23:35
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, Tim Peters, 23:34
- Re: new question, Spice Malenge, 23:25
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, William Elliot, 23:18
- Re: A trigonometric equation, Robert Israel, 23:13
- Re: [Factorization] Is SQUFOF efficient?, Tim Peters, 23:10
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 23:02
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 23:02
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:01
- Re: new question, Martin, 22:52
- matrix functions, Abstract Dissonance, 22:42
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:39
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 22:22
- Re: Word problem - point of no return, Spice Malenge, 22:20
- Word problem - point of no return, doki_pen, 22:04
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 21:25
- Re: new question, Spice Malenge, 21:05
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Lee Rudolph, 21:04
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:50
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Chip Eastham, 20:40
- Re: A trigonometric equation, Deep, 20:36
- Re: Closed and bounded - clarification, W. Dale Hall, 20:35
- Re: Shannon's "well known" result, Gerry Myerson, 20:32
- new question, Martin, 20:17
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 20:16
- Re: Closed and bounded - clarification, Rick Decker, 20:13
- Re: One is a Unit?, Virgil, 20:02
- Re: Finite group theory question, mskirvin, 20:02
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 19:53
- Re: Finite group theory question, Gerry Myerson, 19:51
- Re: sin cos tan help, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:50
- Re: sin cos tan help, Dann Corbit, 19:48
- sin cos tan help, ParTizan, 19:33
- [OT: mangling email addresses] Was: Re: One is a Unit?, Ioannis, 19:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Rupert, 19:33
- Re: One is a Unit?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:29
- Re: One is a Unit?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:26
- Re: Nth Roots of Unity And Groups, Virgil, 19:21
- Re: Nth Roots of Unity And Groups, hale, 19:19
- Re: Nth Roots of Unity And Groups, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:18
- Closed and bounded - clarification, Guy Corrigall, 19:11
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 19:09
- Re: One is a Unit?, James Dolan, 19:06
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 19:02
- Finite group theory question, Doug B, 19:00
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 18:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 18:35
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 18:34
- Re: A trigonometric equation, Robert Israel, 18:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 18:24
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 18:21
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 18:00
- Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David Grieve, 17:55
- Re: One is a Unit?, Robert Israel, 17:38
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Chip Eastham, 17:34
- Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:34
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 17:28
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 17:25
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, Robert Israel, 17:23
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, John H Palmieri, 17:18
- Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Konrad Viltersten, 17:18
- Re: distributive property proof, Ken Pledger, 17:09
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 17:08
- Re: subseries, Ken Pledger, 16:58
- Re: Even more tensor trouble, David Park, 16:56
- Re: Using my analysis, here are 4 under-valued stocks..., LuckyDucky, 16:56
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 16:47
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Russell, 16:34
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 16:29
- Re: Help with Optimization, A, 16:22
- Re: Help with Optimization, Chip Eastham, 16:16
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, MoeBlee, 16:15
- diFFerential-equations with symmetry that gives two invariants!, NILS BÖRJESSON, 16:15
- Re: Parity of Sum of Binomial Coefficients., Tim Peters, 16:08
- svd question, dps, 16:08
- Re: One is a Unit?, dtfoster, 16:04
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:03
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Snis Pilbor, 16:02
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 16:00
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, eugene, 15:59
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, eugene, 15:58
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:54
- Re: Help with Optimization, A, 15:52
- Re: Help with Optimization, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:44
- Geometry: easy?, Anolethron, 15:40
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 15:39
- Re: Help with Optimization, Chip Eastham, 15:35
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, eugene, 15:25
- Help with Optimization, A, 15:12
- Re: Nth Roots of Unity And Groups, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:11
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Herman Rubin, 15:09
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:06
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 15:04
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 15:04
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 15:04
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 15:04
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:51
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Robert Israel, 14:50
- Nth Roots of Unity And Groups, themadhatter012, 14:41
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:21
- Re: subseries, correction to previous, MR, 14:04
- Re: Four Color Theorem, bill, 13:55
- A trigonometric equation, Deep, 13:55
- Re: distributive property proof, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:47
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 13:47
- Re: Using my analysis, here are 4 under-valued stocks..., ynotssor, 13:44
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, N/A, 13:43
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 13:36
- Re: The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, Gene Ward Smith, 13:30
- Re: distributive property proof, Luke Wu, 13:28
- Re: distributive property proof, Luke Wu, 13:27
- Re: Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:26
- Re: The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, symphony, 13:20
- Re: Using my analysis, here are 4 under-valued stocks..., draccarlawpet, 13:18
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 13:15
- Re: Parity of Sum of Binomial Coefficients., The Qurqirish Dragon, 13:08
- Re: distributive property proof, Aloha Kakuikanu, 13:05
- Re: The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, symphony, 12:59
- Re: Parity of Sum of Binomial Coefficients., Spice Malenge, 12:42
- Re: P4 polysign product study, Spoonfed, 12:37
- Re: subseries, Dave L. Renfro, 12:36
- Parity of Sum of Binomial Coefficients., googleposter226, 12:29
- Re: L^p duality, don, 12:25
- Re: Silly Proof, wkaras, 12:15
- Re: Functional calculus question, Gonįalo Rodrigues, 12:14
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Ryan Reich, 12:13
- Re: Using my analysis, here are 4 under-valued stocks..., ynotssor, 12:12
- Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David C . Ullrich, 12:12
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Nathan, 12:10
- Re: distributive property proof, supermoron, 12:08
- Re: Number of Monte-Carlo evaluations, Herman Rubin, 11:59
- Re: subseries, Ryan Reich, 11:58
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Ronald Bruck, 11:52
- Re: Even more tensor trouble, Ryan Reich, 11:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Jens Kruse Andersen, 11:44
- Re: solving an unusual trig equation, David W . Cantrell, 11:44
- Re: irreducible polynomial, Arturo Magidin, 11:35
- Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David C . Ullrich, 11:34
- Re: irreducible polynomial, Arturo Magidin, 11:34
- Re: Using my analysis, here are 4 under-valued stocks..., draccarlawpet, 11:24
- Re: P4 polysign product study, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 11:19
- Re: irreducible polynomial, mina_world, 11:11
- Re: (RSPoliticsW) I'm Calling It: What Bu$hCo Will Say When N.Korea Blows Up California?, Jim E, 11:09
- Re: Silly Proof, paya, 11:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 11:01
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 10:58
- Re: Using my analysis, here are 4 under-valued stocks..., ynotssor, 10:50
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 10:41
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 10:23
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, Aage Andersen, 10:21
- Re: distributive property proof, Denis Feldmann, 10:11
- Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, abose, 10:02
- Re: Functional calculus question, David C . Ullrich, 09:54
- distributive property proof, Luke Wu, 09:51
- Even more tensor trouble, Hauke Reddmann, 09:43
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Jyrki Lahtonen, 09:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 09:41
- Re: Using my models, the following are over/under valued, Blash, 09:35
- Re: Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms, David C . Ullrich, 09:34
- Re: square root confusion, Tom, 09:32
- Re: Number of Monte-Carlo evaluations, Jyrki Lahtonen, 09:29
- Re: Functional calculus question, Gonįalo Rodrigues, 09:27
- f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, eugene, 09:24
- Using my analysis, here are 4 under-valued stocks..., draccarlawpet, 09:24
- Using my models, the following are over/under valued, draccarlawpet, 09:19
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, MTD, 09:14
- Re: trigonometric identity, Robert Low, 09:12
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, Denis Feldmann, 08:46
- Re: Functional calculus question, Gonįalo Rodrigues, 08:33
- Re: square root confusion, David W . Cantrell, 08:28
- Re: Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, victor_meldrew_666, 08:15
- Re: Functional calculus question, David C . Ullrich, 08:04
- Re: derivatives of power of a function, luisa, 08:03
- Re: trigonometric identity, Bart, 08:02
- Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), Lee Rudolph, 07:59
- Re: Is this integral well known?, G. A. Edgar, 07:58
- Re: union convex set is not convex, David C . Ullrich, 07:53
- Shannon's "well known" result, David Grieve, 07:52
- Re: distribution ?, David C . Ullrich, 07:47
- Re: Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, Lee Rudolph, 07:44
- Re: trigonometric identity, Robert Low, 07:37
- Re: One is a Unit?, Lee Rudolph, 07:32
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, David C . Ullrich, 07:30
- Re: trigonometric identity, Bart, 07:22
- Re: Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms, Robert Low, 07:19
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 07:07
- Re: square root confusion, matt271829-news, 07:01
- irreducible polynomial, mina_world, 06:58
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news, 06:36
- Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms, nt109nsf, 06:34
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray, 06:33
- Re: Number of Monte-Carlo evaluations, David Bernier, 06:10
- Re: square root confusion, Tom, 05:56
- Re: How many finite geometries are there on n points? Or is there at least, T.H. Ray, 05:37
- Re: union convex set is not convex, Ismail, 05:18
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Gottfried Helms, 05:08
- Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), David Bernier, 04:42
- Re: trigonometric identity, Robert Low, 04:42
- trigonometric identity, Bart, 04:36
- Re: endomorphim ring of a simple module, Derek Holt, 04:33
- decomposition of a logarithm of 1/R in the series, eugene, 04:28
- Re: Is this integral well known?, Gene Ward Smith, 04:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Rupert, 04:05
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Rupert, 04:02
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 03:55
- Re: How many finite geometries are there on n points? Or is there at least a non-trivial upper bound for this?, dtmackenzie, 03:55
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, Tim Peters, 03:45
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 03:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 03:39
- Re: Is this integral well known?, Robert Low, 03:37
- Re: Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, Gene Ward Smith, 03:37
- Re: Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, Thomas Mautsch, 03:27
- Re: Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, Michael Siemon, 03:27
- Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, jaapsch, 03:03
- Re: Is this integral well known?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 02:52
- Re: Is this integral well known?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 02:49
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, Tim Peters, 02:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 02:45
- Linear Regression with occasional out-of-range data, Jack, 02:37
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Bryan Olson, 02:36
- Re: Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, Gene Ward Smith, 02:31
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 02:26
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 02:26
- Re: Is this integral well known?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 02:26
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Rupert, 02:17
- Re: Computing a series, Robert Israel, 02:17
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Rupert, 02:14
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 02:12
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates, 01:57
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, blown cap, 01:55
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 01:14
- Re: Is this integral well known?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 01:12
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 01:02
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:40
- Re: A graph where every edge might be a vertex itself, Proginoskes, 00:38
- Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, Tim Peters, 00:26
- Re: Is this integral well known?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 00:21
June 20, 2006
- Re: subseries, correction to previous, Mike, 23:56
- Re: subseries, Mike, 23:48
- Re: Is this integral well known?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 23:40
- Re: P4 polysign product study, Spoonfed, 23:31
- Re: Is this integral well known?, Nacho, 23:20
- subseries, MR, 23:14
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Gerry Myerson, 23:10
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 23:09
- Re: One is a Unit?, Dave Seaman, 23:01
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 22:59
- Re: One is a Unit?, James Dolan, 22:59
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 22:56
- Re: Basic complex analysis question, The World Wide Wade, 22:44
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 22:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 22:17
- Re: Is this integral well known?, Gene Ward Smith, 22:11
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 22:08
- Is this integral well known?, Nacho, 22:06
- Re: Basic complex analysis question, Gene Ward Smith, 21:57
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 21:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 21:47
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 21:40
- Re: One is a Unit?, Gene Ward Smith, 21:38
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 21:34
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray, 21:32
- One is a Unit?, dtfoster, 21:28
- Re: Basic complex analysis question, Dik T. Winter, 21:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 21:23
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 21:16
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 21:10
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 21:07
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 20:54
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 20:47
- Re: square root confusion, Arturo Magidin, 20:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:30
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Gib Bogle, 20:28
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Dann Corbit, 20:27
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Gib Bogle, 20:25
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:19
- Re: Frustrating group actions question, mskirvin, 20:16
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 20:14
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 20:07
- Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Snis Pilbor, 20:05
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:04
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 19:58
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Dik T. Winter, 19:51
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 19:49
- Re: derivatives of power of a function, Robert Israel, 19:48
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, Spice Malenge, 19:42
- Re: derivatives of power of a function, Gene Ward Smith, 19:35
- Re: square root confusion, The World Wide Wade, 19:26
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 19:26
- Re: square root confusion, The World Wide Wade, 19:25
- Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 19:21
- Re: derivatives of power of a function, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:17
- Re: (x+y)^n = x^n+y^n, Proginoskes, 19:16
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Lee Rudolph, 19:16
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 19:08
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, litsohate, 19:07
- Re: solving an unusual trig equation, Robert Israel, 19:06
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Nathan, 19:03
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Proginoskes, 18:59
- Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), Timothy Murphy, 18:58
- Re: Basic complex analysis question, The World Wide Wade, 18:57
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:53
- derivatives of power of a function, luisa, 18:34
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:16
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:15
- Frustrating group actions question, stonemcstone, 18:11
- Re: ((p-3)/2)! mod p, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 18:10
- Re: ((p-3)/2)! mod p, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 18:02
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates, 18:01
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 17:59
- Functional calculus question, Gonįalo Rodrigues, 17:51
- Re: solving an unusual trig equation, Joshua C Sasmor, 17:37
- Re: Homomorphism, Bill Dubuque, 17:36
- Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), Fedor, 17:27
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Ken Pledger, 17:21
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 17:21
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Bill Dubuque, 17:14
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 17:09
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:58
- Re: Simple proofs with a "lateral thinking step", James Waldby, 16:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:54
- Re: analysis...., Bill Dubuque, 16:53
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 16:48
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 16:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:46
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 16:46
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:44
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Albrecht, 16:42
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:41
- Re: Homomorphism, Bill Dubuque, 16:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 16:38
- Re: Questions about probability functions, Zerex71, 16:35
- Re: endomorphim ring of a simple module, Timothy Murphy, 16:35
- Re: Basic complex analysis question, Timothy Murphy, 16:27
- Re: Computing a series, Robert Israel, 16:12
- Re: Computing a series, matt271829-news, 15:55
- Re: Questions about probability functions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:35
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 15:33
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:32
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:29
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, stephen, 15:27
- Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Konrad Viltersten, 15:22
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 15:17
- Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Dave L. Renfro, 15:17
- Re: So What's a Determinant?, Thomas Mautsch, 15:14
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, imaginatorium, 15:13
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure /error correction, Gottfried Helms, 15:12
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Dann Corbit, 15:10
- Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:10
- Re: square root confusion, David W . Cantrell, 15:05
- Re: union convex set is not convex, Virgil, 15:04
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Gottfried Helms, 15:03
- Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:01
- Re: square root confusion, Arturo Magidin, 14:58
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Bryan Olson, 14:58
- Re: So What's a Determinant?, victor_meldrew_666, 14:56
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 14:56
- Four Color Theorem, bill, 14:55
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Sensei, 14:54
- pde, prakash, 14:51
- Re: Computing a series, Patrick Coilland, 14:50
- Re: Find all solutions, Patrick Coilland, 14:47
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 14:46
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:43
- Re: square root confusion, Tom, 14:42
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, stephen, 14:41
- Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, victor_meldrew_666, 14:39
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Konrad Viltersten, 14:38
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:36
- Re: So What's a Determinant?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:30
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:30
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 14:25
- Re: ((p-3)/2)! mod p, Pubkeybreaker, 14:21
- Versions and indistinguishability, Konrad Viltersten, 14:20
- Re: Find all solutions, Pubkeybreaker, 14:17
- Re: Computing a series, matt271829-news, 14:15
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 14:15
- Re: distribution ?, Fedor, 14:08
- Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Dave L. Renfro, 14:04
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, martin cohen, 14:03
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:02
- Re: Basic complex analysis question, Gene Ward Smith, 14:00
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:56
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Duncan Smith, 13:55
- Re: Find all solutions, Patrick Coilland, 13:53
- Even Perfect numbers and the Colatz 3x+1 problem, Dan, 13:51
- Re: ((p-3)/2)! mod p, victor_meldrew_666, 13:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 13:47
- Re: Basic complex analysis question, James, 13:44
- Basic complex analysis question, James, 13:44
- Re: Questions about probability functions, Zerex71, 13:43
- Re: Find all solutions, Pubkeybreaker, 13:40
- Re: square root confusion, Arturo Magidin, 13:39
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 13:37
- Re: differential geometry..., Anolethron, 13:35
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 13:31
- Re: Like baseball, Spice Malenge, 13:22
- Find all solutions, hayk, 13:14
- Re: Difference Please, Robert Israel, 13:13
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Lee Rudolph, 13:10
- Re: The sequence from HELL., Herman Rubin, 13:10
- square root confusion, Tom, 13:09
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Gene Ward Smith, 13:07
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Gene Ward Smith, 13:03
- Re: The sequence from HELL., Robert Israel, 13:02
- Re: Simple proofs with a "lateral thinking step", Duncan Muirhead, 12:54
- An minimization problem regarding the inverse of a Gram matrix, su_jionglong@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:50
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 12:39
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, skuesey, 12:30
- Re: Simple proofs with a "lateral thinking step", Dave L. Renfro, 12:29
- Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith, 12:27
- Re: How many finite geometries are there on n points? Or is there at least a non-trivial upper bound for this?, David W . Cantrell, 12:19
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 12:14
- Simple proofs with a "lateral thinking step", Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 12:09
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 12:03
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Gene Ward Smith, 11:53
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 11:39
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:38
- Failure?, sensible, 11:37
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Jman, 11:28
- Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Jman, 11:24
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, stephen, 11:23
- Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:19
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 10:42
- Re: (x+y)^n = x^n+y^n, Patrick Coilland, 10:37
- Re: Like baseball, John Meglier, 10:30
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, John Meglier, 10:29
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, Randy Poe, 10:07
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, Randy Poe, 10:06
- Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, Pubkeybreaker, 10:04
- Re: union convex set is not convex, Dave L. Renfro, 10:01
- Re: (x+y)^n = x^n+y^n, mina_world, 09:59
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, willo_thewisp, 09:56
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tony Orlow, 09:50
- Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, D. J. Bernstein, 09:38
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:31
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 09:25
- paths and walks, eric, 09:21
- Re: (x+y)^n = x^n+y^n, Patrick Coilland, 09:19
- Întegral of the bernoulli-functions, Gottfried Helms, 09:15
- Number of Monte-Carlo evaluations, Jake Mulch, 09:07
- Re: union convex set is not convex, Ismail, 09:07
- Re: example of particular functions in Analisys, David C . Ullrich, 09:07
- (x+y)^n = x^n+y^n, mina_world, 09:02
- Re: differential geometry..., Anolethron, 08:59
- Re: differential geometry..., bobovski, 08:55
- Re: distribution ?, David C . Ullrich, 08:52
- Re: union convex set is not convex, Dave L. Renfro, 08:48
- Re: union convex set is not convex, William Elliot, 08:46
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 08:40
- Re: differential geometry..., Anolethron, 08:32
- Re: differential geometry..., Robert Low, 08:21
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 08:18
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 08:16
- Re: distribution ?, David C . Ullrich, 08:07
- union convex set is not convex, Ismail, 08:06
- Re: Measure Theory, smooth, 08:05
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, David C . Ullrich, 07:59
- Re: The sequence from HELL., matt271829-news, 07:57
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 07:55
- Re: Measurability question, G. A. Edgar, 07:46
- Re: differential geometry..., Anolethron, 07:44
- Re: Like baseball, David Moran, 07:37
- Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 07:34
- Newton-Kantorovich theorem demonstration, lucas, 07:26
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 07:20
- Re: uniform distribution of P points on a (D) dimensions sphere, kunzmilan, 07:19
- example of particular functions in Analisys, redsun82, 07:02
- Re: Hammick's Law of Thread Decay, Toni Lassila, 06:59
- Re: Computing a series, Patrick Coilland, 06:56
- Re: differential geometry..., Lee Rudolph, 06:39
- Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, MTD, 06:28
- differential geometry..., Anolethron, 06:25
- Re: Computing a series, csimon, 06:25
- Re: Binomial and hypergeometric distributions, kunzmilan, 06:18
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Gottfried Helms, 06:01
- Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, MTD, 05:57
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, Justin, 05:55
- Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), Jyrki Lahtonen, 05:50
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:39
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, guenther vonKnakspot, 05:36
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:34
- endomorphim ring of a simple module, Arman, 05:28
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, gjedwards, 05:28
- How many finite geometries are there on n points? Or is there at least a non-trivial upper bound for this?, dtmackenzie, 05:23
- Re: convex function., mina_world, 05:20
- Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), David Bernier, 05:00
- Re: sobolev embedding ?, Fedor, 04:59
- Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), David Bernier, 04:58
- Re: distribution ?, Fedor, 04:58
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Gottfried Helms, 04:57
- Re: convex function., José Carlos Santos, 04:54
- Re: Hammick's Law of Thread Decay, Larry Lard, 04:47
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Gottfried Helms, 04:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Rupert, 04:24
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, MTD, 04:21
- convex function., mina_world, 04:17
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, The Last Danish Pastry, 04:14
- Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), David Bernier, 04:02
- Difference Please, dtfoster, 03:59
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 03:33
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 03:12
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 03:04
- Re: analysis...., Robert Israel, 02:24
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:18
- Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Euler, 02:15
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, fishfry, 02:07
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates, 01:48
- Re: e^(pi*sqrt(427)) and j(tau)-, titus_piezas, 01:48
- Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Tim Peters, 01:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 01:46
- Re: analysis...., NotP, 01:45
- Re: e^(pi*sqrt(427)) and j(tau)-, titus_piezas, 01:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 01:42
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, guenther vonKnakspot, 01:13
- Re: JSH: Like baseball, Gerry Myerson, 01:05
- analysis...., mina_world, 00:54
- JSH: Like baseball, jstevh, 00:54
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 00:06
June 19, 2006
- Re: The sequence from HELL., Robert Israel, 23:36
- Re: Continuous Gradient?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:34
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:34
- Re: Graph Theory - Vertex Colouring, mikemaskery, 23:31
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Gottfried Helms, 23:26
- Re: Continuous Gradient?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:19
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Dann Corbit, 23:08
- Re: binary relations, Arturo Magidin, 22:50
- Re: linear?, Peter L. Montgomery, 22:37
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Russell Easterly, 22:34
- P4 polysign product study, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 22:24
- Re: Dirichlet problem / direct sum, Rick Decker, 22:23
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Mike Kelly, 22:07
- Continuous Gradient?, Abstract Dissonance, 22:00
- Re: The sequence from HELL., matt271829-news, 21:50
- Re: The sequence from HELL., matt271829-news, 21:38
- Re: So they lied, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:32
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:26
- Re: Computing a series, Ronald Bruck, 21:08
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news, 20:48
- Re: The sequence from HELL., martin cohen, 20:35
- Re: solving an unusual trig equation, Robert Israel, 20:09
- Re: [Factorization] Is SQUFOF efficient?, Gerry Myerson, 20:06
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news, 19:54
- Re: Silly Proof, Proginoskes, 19:47
- Re: So they lied, Proginoskes, 19:45
- Re: looking at mean, mode, and median, Proginoskes, 19:36
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Proginoskes, 19:28
- Re: distribution ?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:25
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Proginoskes, 19:21
- Re: Silly Proof, E, 19:05
- Re: sobolev embedding ?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:01
- Re: Silly Proof, E, 18:57
- Re: JSH: So they lied, amzoti, 18:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Tim Peters, 18:53
- Re: Silly Proof, Lord Protector, 18:51
- Re: Silly Proof, John Meglier, 18:42
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Gib Bogle, 18:41
- Silly Proof, E, 18:39
- sobolev embedding ?, Fedor, 18:34
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 18:28
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 17:58
- Question with inforation theory, yezi, 17:37
- Re: solving an unusual trig equation, Virgil, 17:30
- Re: please explain the solution-, JEMebius, 17:29
- solving an unusual trig equation, Joshua C Sasmor, 17:21
- Re: Computing a series, Gottfried Helms, 17:15
- Re: q:partial derivitive for image comparison, laniik, 16:58
- Re: e^(pi*sqrt(427)) and j(tau)-, JEMebius, 16:58
- q:partial derivitive for image comparison, laniik, 16:33
- Re: Measurability question, NotP, 15:58
- Re: Local Minimum, NotP, 15:47
- Re: Voronoi Diagram, Lot-o-fun, 15:37
- Re: looking at mean, mode, and median, Lot-o-fun, 15:37
- Re: Measurability question, G. A. Edgar, 15:21
- Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, Virgil, 15:11
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:01
- Re: An uncountable countable set, guenther vonKnakspot, 14:54
- Re: Measurability question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:51
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:47
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:43
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:41
- Dirichlet problem / direct sum, don, 14:37
- Re: Local Minimum, The World Wide Wade, 14:35
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:35
- Re: Rings of order p^2 with unit -- why are they commutative?, Cameron, 14:34
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 14:34
- Re: please explain the solution., Randy Poe, 14:25
- Re: Computing a series, A N Niel, 14:22
- Re: Voronoi Diagram, Robert Low, 14:18
- Re: Measurability question, Gonįalo Rodrigues, 14:18
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:09
- Re: Computing a series, Robert Israel, 14:08
- Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, Pubkeybreaker, 14:06
- Re: Measurability question, Robert Israel, 14:04
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:03
- Voronoi Diagram, prakash, 14:00
- please explain the solution., jaya, 13:51
- Re: The sequence from HELL., Robert Israel, 13:50
- Re: Measurability question, José Carlos Santos, 13:49
- Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, Pubkeybreaker, 13:46
- Some (slightly used) math books for sale, dgiaimo, 13:42
- Re: The sequence from HELL., José Carlos Santos, 13:39
- Re: Prove this, stush, 13:39
- Hammick's Law of Thread Decay, Larry Hammick, 13:30
- Computing a series, csimon, 13:19
- Re: [Factorization] Is SQUFOF efficient?, Tim Peters, 13:14
- distribution ?, Fedor, 13:10
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news, 12:48
- Measurability question, Gonįalo Rodrigues, 12:48
- Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, Gerard Schildberger, 12:39
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 12:37
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, gwh, 12:36
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news, 12:32
- Re: Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, Tapio, 12:30
- The sequence from HELL., ram . rachum, 12:24
- Re: Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, Tapio, 12:22
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, abose, 12:19
- Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin, 12:07
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news, 11:59
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, guenther vonKnakspot, 11:35
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 11:32
- Re: binary relations, Arturo Magidin, 11:30
- Re: is Poisson process also Markov process ?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:27
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 11:24
- Re: heine cantor teorem, David C . Ullrich, 11:08
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, abose, 10:52
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:51
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Lee Rudolph, 10:44
- Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, MTD, 10:43
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, Peter Webb, 10:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 10:43
- Re: heine cantor teorem, Ryan Reich, 10:37
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Nathan, 10:35
- Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, cody . roux, 10:24
- Re: heine cantor teorem, Dave L. Renfro, 10:22
- Re: heine cantor teorem, Dave L. Renfro, 10:17
- Re: Homomorphism, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 10:07
- Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, MTD, 09:57
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Randy Poe, 09:50
- Re: Factorial Question, David W . Cantrell, 09:40
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough, 09:33
- [Factorization] Is SQUFOF efficient?, MTD, 09:31
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, GARY, 09:27
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news, 08:55
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 08:53
- Re: is Poisson process also Markov process ?, James Dolan, 08:53
- Re: heine cantor teorem, Paulo Matos, 08:44
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Dik T. Winter, 08:41
- Re: heine cantor teorem, David C . Ullrich, 08:31
- Re: heine cantor teorem, David C . Ullrich, 08:29
- Re: heine cantor teorem, David C . Ullrich, 08:28
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, David C . Ullrich, 08:21
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 08:07
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 08:03
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news, 07:41
- Re: heine cantor teorem, Paulo Matos, 07:36
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news, 07:32
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 07:07
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter, 06:44
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, matt271829-news, 06:08
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 06:01
- Re: a question about Lebesgue integral, cody . roux, 05:56
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 05:43
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 19, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:39
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Dement, 05:18
- Re: a question about Lebesgue integral, eugene, 04:54
- Re: is Poisson process also Markov process ?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 04:54
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 04:47
- Re: So What's a Determinant?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 04:44
- Re: binary relations, cody . roux, 04:41
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 03:49
- Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, abose, 03:44
- Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 03:43
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:37
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 03:22
- Re: Local Minimum, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 03:19
- Re: binary relations, Virgil, 03:05
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:03
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 02:55
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 02:48
- Re: linear?, Toni Lassila, 02:41
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Keith Ramsay, 02:30
- Re: linear?, Reef Fish, 02:26
- Re: linear?, G Patel, 02:18
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax, 02:14
- Re: Local Minimum, NotP, 02:06
- Re: linear?, Mike, 02:05
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Keith Ramsay, 01:49
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:47
- linear?, G Patel, 00:53
- Re: Graph Theory - Vertex Colouring, James Dolan, 00:46
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, hale, 00:13
- Re: So What's a Determinant?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:11
- Re: Graph Theory - Vertex Colouring, caulagi, 00:07
June 18, 2006
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 23:25
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:24
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 23:17
- Graph Theory - Vertex Colouring, wojciech, 23:07
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:06
- Re: So What's a Determinant?, Gene Ward Smith, 22:31
- Re: Anybody got an IQ over 20 here?, Euler, 22:11
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, William Elliot, 21:53
- Re: So What's a Determinant?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:48
- Re: So What's a Determinant?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 21:44
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 21:39
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 21:27
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 21:23
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 21:14
- Re: FACTORIALS BY Algorithm -please comment, Gerry Myerson, 21:05
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Lot-o-fun, 21:04
- Observed elevation of a mountain peak, GARY, 20:55
- Re: JSH: SF: Sad part, my discoveries against politics, Dik T. Winter, 20:54
- Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin, 20:20
- Re: e^(pi*sqrt(427)) and j(tau), Robert Israel, 19:56
- redlady115@xxxxxxxxxxx, angel, 19:46
- redlady115@xxxxxxxxxxx, angel, 19:46
- redlady115@xxxxxxxxxxx, angel, 19:46
- Re: So What's a Determinant?, Gene Ward Smith, 19:44
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Proginoskes, 19:38
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:34
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:29
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Proginoskes, 19:22
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Rupert, 19:19
- So What's a Determinant?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:18
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, steiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:15
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, steiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:15
- Re: e^(pi*sqrt(427)) and j(tau), Proginoskes, 19:12
- Re: Math Graduate program in DC, Gene Ward Smith, 19:10
- Re: Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, Pubkeybreaker, 18:50
- Re: Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, José Carlos Santos, 18:49
- Re: Math Graduate program in DC, Chip Eastham, 18:47
- Re: Rings of order p^2 with unit -- why are they commutative?, Peter L. Montgomery, 18:32
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Gene Ward Smith, 18:09
- Re: heine cantor teorem, Ryan Reich, 17:49
- Math Graduate program in DC, alex_G, 17:49
- Re: heine cantor teorem, N. Silver, 17:47
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:18
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Spoonfed, 17:10
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Tapio, 17:09
- Re: Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, Ryan Reich, 16:50
- Re: Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, José Carlos Santos, 16:40
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 16:07
- Re: heine cantor teorem, Ryan Reich, 15:46
- Re: heine cantor teorem, Ryan Reich, 15:43
- Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil, 15:30
- I N F I N I T I < ! >, INFINITI, 15:27
- Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, Tapio, 15:22
- Re: heine cantor teorem, David C . Ullrich, 15:22
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Virgil, 15:18
- Re: heine cantor teorem, David C . Ullrich, 15:18
- Re: Tensor Trouble, Robert Low, 15:15
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, hale, 14:51
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Robert Israel, 14:43
- Re: Affine and projective manifolds, Die Herren Rubens und Michel, 14:25
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Aatu Koskensilta, 14:20
- An uncountable countable set, mueckenh, 14:16
- Rings of order p^2 with unit -- why are they commutative?, Doug B, 14:16
- Re: Collatz Blueprint for Failure, steiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:01
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax, 13:54
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax, 13:54
- Re: heine cantor teorem, Ryan Reich, 13:28
- Re: Understanding the general from of a conic as it relates to standard form equations - Grade 11, Virgil, 13:13
- heine cantor teorem, Catarina Dias, 13:13
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Virgil, 13:09
- Re: L^p duality, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:58
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 12:44
- Re: is Poisson process also Markov process ?, James Dolan, 12:44
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, Ryan Reich, 12:22
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, Ryan Reich, 12:12
- Re: Need help with the final laps of this long ring theory problem, Ryan Reich, 11:58
- Re: a question about Lebesgue integral, Ryan Reich, 11:53
- Re: is Poisson process also Markov process ?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:51
- Re: Anybody got an IQ over 20 here?, Euler, 11:48
- Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, guenther vonKnakspot, 11:45
- Re: weak convergence and moment of measure ?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:45
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, guenther vonKnakspot, 11:43
- Re: Local Minimum, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:38
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 11:35
- Re: Homomorphism, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 11:27
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:22
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:18
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, Mike Kent, 11:17
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 11:16
- Re: How to find certain integer triples?, Chip Eastham, 11:15
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 11:13
- a question about Lebesgue integral, eugene, 11:04
- Re: tensor question, c186282, 10:59
- Re: So they lied, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:55
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, Savihammas, 10:50
- Re: This should be an easy question for you guys - triangulation?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:46
- Need help with the final laps of this long ring theory problem, Doug B, 10:40
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Dave L. Renfro, 10:33
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, guenther vonKnakspot, 10:22
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, Savihammas, 10:07
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax, 09:40
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:28
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, William Elliot, 09:19
- Re: Tensor Trouble, Lee Rudolph, 09:00
- Watch Adult TV, Sports, Worldcup, sales, 08:40
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax, 08:34
- Tensor Trouble, Hauke Reddmann, 08:31
- Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, Abstract Dissonance, 08:30
- Re: This should be an easy question for you guys - triangulation?, almo, 08:05
- Re: Straightforward (?) nets question, Tom Smith, 07:55
- Constructions of Real Numbers, William Elliot, 07:26
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, guenther vonKnakspot, 07:21
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax, 06:55
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, matt271829-news, 06:36
- Re: Understanding the general from of a conic as it relates to standard form equations - Grade 11, matt271829-news, 06:16
- Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, T.H. Ray, 05:59
- Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Reef Fish, 05:34
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, mvonkann2000, 05:32
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 05:23
- Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, Richard Henry, 05:20
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 05:10
- Re: e^(pi*sqrt(427)) and j(tau), Robert Israel, 04:35
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax, 04:22
- My own Monty Hall explanation, Savihammas, 04:07
- Re: Understanding the general from of a conic as it relates to standard form equations - Grade 11, uberclay, 04:03
- Re: analysis.., mina_world, 03:39
- Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, mike4ty4, 03:25
- Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, mike4ty4, 03:22
- Re: analysis.., Patrick Coilland, 03:13
- Re: Simple proof of FLT ?, Wim Benthem, 03:10
- Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, guenther vonKnakspot, 03:05
- Re: JSH: SF: Sad part, my discoveries against politics, Tim Peters, 03:05
- Re: differential equation+even, Robert Israel, 03:03
- Re: differential equation+even, Robert Israel, 03:02
- Re: Understanding the general from of a conic as it relates to standard form equations - Grade 11, Virgil, 02:43
- Re: Prove this, Dale Shoults, 02:17
- Re: How to find certain integer triples?, Proginoskes, 02:09
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, mvonkann2000, 02:08
- Re: looking at mean, mode, and median, Virgil, 02:07
- Re: Conservation of information questions, Jim Black, 02:07
- Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Proginoskes, 02:06
- Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Proginoskes, 01:59
- Re: Politics, Proginoskes, 01:52
- Understanding the general from of a conic as it relates to standard form equations - Grade 11, uberclay, 01:52
- Re: So they lied, Proginoskes, 01:51
- Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, Proginoskes, 01:49
- Re: looking at mean, mode, and median, Proginoskes, 01:47
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Proginoskes, 01:38
- Re: e^(pi*sqrt(427)) and j(tau), Proginoskes, 01:23
- Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, Gerry Myerson, 00:43
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Gene Ward Smith, 00:29
- analysis.., mina_world, 00:25
- Re: How to find certain integer triples?, rich burge, 00:24
- Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Tim Peters, 00:14
June 17, 2006
- Re: How to find certain integer triples?, Chip Eastham, 23:28
- Re: Local Minimum, NotP, 23:23
- Re: How to find certain integer triples?, Sandi . Eastham, 23:22
- Re: Why is this true, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Simple proof of FLT ?, Roman B. Binder, 22:57
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 22:15
- Re: tensor question, Julian V. Noble, 22:10
- Re: Politics, John Meglier, 21:55
- Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, John Meglier, 21:53
- Re: This should be an easy question for you guys - triangulation?, John Meglier, 21:48
- Re: This should be an easy question for you guys - triangulation?, matt . heise, 21:13
- Re: This should be an easy question for you guys - triangulation?, Jeremy Boden, 21:02
- How to find certain integer triples?, rich burge, 20:50
- This should be an easy question for you guys - triangulation?, almo, 20:36
- Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, Dave, 20:32
- Re: Straightforward (?) nets question, smn, 20:26
- Re: Local Minimum, The World Wide Wade, 20:24
- Re: So they lied, John Meglier, 20:19
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Barb Knox, 20:14
- Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, John Meglier, 20:06
- Re: Those damn fools, math is before us, John Meglier, 20:03
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Graham Thomas, 19:43
- tensor question, c186282, 19:42
- Re: uniform distribution of P points on a (D) dimensions sphere, Stan Liou, 19:34
- Re: ((p-3)/2)! mod p, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 19:29
- looking at mean, mode, and median, SportsNut, 19:19
- Re: uniform distribution of P points on a (D) dimensions sphere, David W . Cantrell, 19:18
- Re: uniform distribution of P points on a (D) dimensions sphere, CAFxX, 19:08
- Local Minimum, NotP, 18:27
- Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, Lord Protector, 18:22
- Re: Those damn fools, math is before us, The Last Danish Pastry, 18:17
- Re: uniform distribution of P points on a (D) dimensions sphere, Dave Seaman, 18:13
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 18:01
- Re: Factorial Question, The World Wide Wade, 17:58
- uniform distribution of P points on a (D) dimensions sphere, CAFxX, 17:36
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates, 17:24
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates, 17:05
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Ryan Reich, 16:58
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, ungernerik, 16:53
- Re: Fermat's Last Theorem and infinite descent, Roman B. Binder, 16:37
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax, 16:19
- Re: Looking for feedback for a True/False question from a practice qual, mskirvin, 16:18
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Ryan Reich, 15:30
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, A N Niel, 15:27
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax, 15:08
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Gunner, 14:59
- Re: weak convergence and moment of measure ?, Fedor, 14:54
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:52
- Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, Virgil, 14:13
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:08
- Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, ungernerik, 13:48
- Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, willo_thewisp, 13:35
- Re: particular solution of the differential equation, G.E. Ivey, 13:26
- Re: Anybody got an IQ over 20 here?, Euler, 13:21
- Re: Factorial Question, matt271829-news, 13:15
- Re: weak convergence and moment of measure ?, Herman Rubin, 13:12
- Re: Are all subsets of affine space quasi-compact (in the Zariski topology) ?, canadan, 13:03
- Re: Probability Question, Herman Rubin, 13:01
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, ungernerik, 12:53
- Re: ((p-3)/2)! mod p, victor_meldrew_666, 12:51
- Re: Are all subsets of affine space quasi-compact (in the Zariski topology) ?, Ryan Reich, 12:51
- Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, willo_thewisp, 12:42
- Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:16
- Are all subsets of affine space quasi-compact (in the Zariski topology) ?, canadan, 12:09
- Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, SkyHc, 11:41
- Factorial Question, Jonas, 11:40
- JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, jstevh, 11:17
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, jstevh, 10:59
- Re: particular solution of the differential equation, John Meglier, 10:59
- Re: particular solution of the differential equation, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 10:58
- particular solution of the differential equation, eugene, 10:45
- Re: problem - help me please, eugene, 10:42
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Dave L. Renfro, 10:36
- Solving Maxwell's equations with Matlab, Tom mmm, 10:22
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax, 10:19
- Re: IHES centenary of A.Weil, Allan Adler, 10:15
- Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:59
- Re: problem - help me please, adam, 09:37
- Constructions of Real Numbers, admax, 08:53
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:35
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, David C . Ullrich, 08:14
- is Poisson process also Markov process ?, vertigo, 07:35
- Re: Straightforward (?) nets question, Tom Smith, 06:53
- ((p-3)/2)! mod p, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 06:52
- DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, Dave, 06:52
- Re: orthogonal matrix+decomposition, Fedor, 06:51
- Straightforward (?) nets question, Tom Smith, 06:33
- e^(pi*sqrt(427)) and j(tau), titus_piezas, 06:28
- weak convergence and moment of measure ?, Fedor, 06:08
- Re: is Poisson process also Markov process ?, Mike Kelly, 06:05
- Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), Fedor, 05:56
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 05:51
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), James Dolan, 05:26
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates, 04:44
- Re: Looking for feedback for a True/False question from a practice qual, Falagar, 04:39
- Re: problem - help me please, William Elliot, 04:29
- Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Konrad Viltersten, 04:27
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Gene Ward Smith, 04:22
- Re: problem - help me please, Falagar, 04:21
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates, 04:13
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates, 04:10
- Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Gene Ward Smith, 03:37
- Re: JSH: So they lied, guenther vonKnakspot, 03:25
- Re: Prove this, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 03:15
- problem - help me please, adam, 03:11
- computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates, 02:57
- Re: Prove this, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 02:50
- Re: An improvement on my multi-variable regression analysis, abose, 02:29
- Re: A little programming help..., abose, 02:16
- Re: Anybody got an IQ over 20 here?, Euler, 01:37
- A little programming help..., Euler, 01:20
- Re: So they lied, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:15
- Re: Prove this, Euler, 01:10
- Re: Can you do it?, Dave Rusin, 01:07
- Re: Prove this, Euler, 01:01
- Re: Prove this, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 00:48
- Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Euler, 00:48
June 16, 2006
- Re: Truncated icosahedron and dodecahedron, Christopher J. Henrich, 23:55
- Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Tim Peters, 23:49
- An improvement on my multi-variable regression analysis, draccarlawpet, 23:17
- Re: The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, Gene Ward Smith, 23:01
- Re: So they lied, Spice Melange, 22:58
- Re: The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, Proginoskes, 22:42
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Gene Ward Smith, 22:11
- Re: The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, Gene Ward Smith, 22:08
- Re: Looking for feedback for a True/False question from a practice qual, mskirvin, 22:00
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Spoonfed, 21:54
- Re: Probability Question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:33
- Re: JSH: Politics, Tim Peters, 21:16
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Dik T. Winter, 21:13
- Re: Can you do it?, Robert Israel, 21:13
- Re: Probability Question, Robert Israel, 21:09
- Re: JSH: Politics, Gib Bogle, 20:49
- SoA Press Release "Young Mother and Child Longevity", Actuary, 20:27
- Re: Can you do it?, mike4ty4, 20:23
- Re: JSH: Politics, jstevh, 20:14
- Re: Can you do it?, Robert Israel, 20:12
- Prove this, zxcv, 20:11
- Looking for feedback for a True/False question from a practice qual, Snis Pilbor, 20:08
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 19:48
- Re: Fermat's Last Theorem and infinite descent, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 19:31
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 19:20
- The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, symphony, 19:18
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 19:10
- Re: Can you do it?, mike4ty4, 18:55
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray, 18:49
- Re: arithmétique, Philippe 92, 18:39
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 18:18
- Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Ryan Reich, 18:10
- Re: Probability Question, Keith A. Lewis, 17:59
- Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Ryan Reich, 17:55
- Collatz Blueprint for Failure, Johan van der Galien, 17:46
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 17:40
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 17:37
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 17:25
- Re: Can you do it?, Eric B, 17:24
- Re: JSH: Politics, Proginoskes, 17:21
- Re: FACTORIALS BY Algorithm -please comment, abose, 17:09
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 17:07
- Re: Truncated icosahedron and dodecahedron, Larry Deack, 17:04
- Re: updating sums, Proginoskes, 16:46
- Re: Curtis' Miracle Octad Generator, PaulHjelmstad, 16:45
- Re: SOCKPUPPET ARMY SENDS EMAIL DEATH THREATS TO CHRIST: THE TIME OF CRUCIFIXION DRAWS NEAR!!, Lobby Dosser, 16:39
- Re: What is compact set?, martin dowd, 16:39
- Re: JSH: Politics, cody . roux, 16:31
- Re: Can you do it?, mike4ty4, 16:28
- Fermat's Last Theorem and infinite descent, Gene Ward Smith, 16:12
- Re: Connecting semi-circles, Robert Israel, 16:00
- Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin, 15:57
- Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:54
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:51
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 15:50
- Re: How 3=2, Hanford Carr, 15:21
- Re: Politics, David Moran, 15:17
- Re: Truncated icosahedron and dodecahedron, Christopher J. Henrich, 15:15
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dave L. Renfro, 15:14
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Lee Rudolph, 15:14
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger, 15:13
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 15:12
- Re: Simple proof of FLT: Why is it impossible?, Roman B. Binder, 15:08
- Re: differential equation+even, eugene, 15:07
- Re: Laplace transform, Jman, 15:00
- Re: Laplace transform, Badger, 14:58
- Re: FACTORIALS BY Algorithm -please comment, Jman, 14:52
- Re: Distance between segments, M.J.T. Guy, 14:49
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Gene Ward Smith, 14:45
- Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, The World Wide Wade, 14:40
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 14:35
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:35
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, ArtflDodgr, 14:26
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dave L. Renfro, 14:24
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Patricia Shanahan, 14:22
- Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder, 14:00
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 13:46
- Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Dave Rusin, 13:37
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Michael Stemper, 13:29
- Re: Politics, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:27
- Re: arithmétique, Timothy Murphy, 13:23
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Matthijs Hebly, 13:23
- Re: Single player game theory?, John Bailey, 13:19
- Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Dave Rusin, 13:18
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 13:10
- L^p duality, don, 13:10
- Truncated icosahedron and dodecahedron, Richard Hayden, 12:59
- Re: Affine and projective manifolds, Lee Rudolph, 12:54
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news, 12:50
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dave L. Renfro, 12:14
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dave L. Renfro, 12:08
- Re: JSH: Politics, MTD, 12:03
- Re: Residue Number System Arithmetic, Christian Siebert, 12:02
- Re: Affine and projective manifolds, Die Herren Rubens und Michel, 11:55
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, jcsantos, 11:54
- Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Dave L. Renfro, 11:54
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 11:43
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 11:41
- Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Konrad Viltersten, 11:25
- Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Konrad Viltersten, 11:21
- Re: FACTORIALS BY Algorithm -please comment, The Last Danish Pastry, 11:16
- Re: Politics, The Last Danish Pastry, 11:06
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dik T. Winter, 11:04
- Re: Single player game theory?, makc . the . great, 10:50
- updating sums, Bart, 10:46
- Re: JSH: Politics, bert, 10:46
- Re: Another doubt about Laplace transform, Sandra Bomtempo, 10:41
- FACTORIALS BY Algorithm -please comment, dave, 10:35
- Re: Another doubt about Laplace transform, astanoff, 10:31
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, G. A. Edgar, 10:30
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Mitch, 10:25
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, G. A. Edgar, 10:24
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:19
- Re: JSH: Politics, gjedwards, 10:19
- Another doubt about Laplace transform, Sandra Bomtempo, 10:19
- Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, A N Niel, 10:18
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:16
- Re: Maple experts, who are they?, Dement, 10:16
- JSH: Politics, jstevh, 10:13
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Dik T. Winter, 10:08
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger, 10:07
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Spoonfed, 10:06
- Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Konrad Viltersten, 10:06
- Re: skew: its measure, Hero, 10:05
- Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Dave L. Renfro, 09:59
- Laplace transform, Sandra Bomtempo, 09:44
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:39
- Re: Homomorphism, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:35
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Peter Webb, 09:27
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, David C . Ullrich, 09:23
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dik T. Winter, 09:19
- Re: Connecting semi-circles, b . fokke, 09:18
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dik T. Winter, 09:15
- Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Konrad Viltersten, 09:06
- Re: Single player game theory?, John Bailey, 09:01
- Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, A N Niel, 08:49
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:44
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news, 08:41
- Re: JSH: So they lied, The Last Danish Pastry, 08:41
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Konrad Viltersten, 08:38
- Re: Connecting semi-circles, matt271829-news, 08:35
- Re: Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:29
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:27
- Re: Fuzzy Booleans with Application, Gordon Sande, 08:22
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Gonįalo Rodrigues, 08:12
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger, 08:12
- Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Konrad Viltersten, 08:02
- Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, José Carlos Santos, 07:42
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Mike Kelly, 07:40
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 07:35
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 07:06
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Mike Kelly, 07:00
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:50
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 06:31
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Mike Kelly, 06:16
- skew: its measure, Michel PETITJEAN, 06:10
- Re: arithmétique, José Carlos Santos, 05:55
- arithmétique, denis.pepin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:48
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 05:47
- Re: Pls. help to count probabilities, valery, 05:44
- Re: Can you do it?, MTD, 05:43
- Re: What is compact set?, Ulysse from CH, 05:33
- Re: Residue Number System Arithmetic, Jules César, 05:32
- Re: Pls. help to count probabilities, bert, 04:53
- Re: Fuzzy Booleans with Application, Robert Low, 04:46
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger, 04:35
- Re: Fuzzy Booleans with Application, Han de Bruijn, 04:34
- Re: JSH: To Decker and Peters, MTD, 04:32
- Re: Fuzzy Booleans with Application, Robert Low, 04:30
- SOCKPUPPET ARMY SENDS EMAIL DEATH THREATS TO CHRIST: THE TIME OF CRUCIFIXION DRAWS NEAR!!, Raymond Karczewski, 04:28
- Pls. help to count probabilities, valery, 04:23
- Re: Maple experts, who are they?, Saifd Nasheem, 04:13
- Re: Fuzzy Booleans with Application, Han de Bruijn, 03:52
- Re: Single player game theory?, makc . the . great, 03:44
- Re: Fuzzy Booleans with Application, Robert Low, 03:33
- Re: Fuzzy Booleans with Application, Han de Bruijn, 03:21
- Re: JSH: To Decker and Peters, Rupert, 03:20
- Re: Fuzzy Booleans with Application, Han de Bruijn, 03:15
- Re: What is compact set?, William Elliot, 02:51
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Aatu Koskensilta, 02:40
- Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:22
- Re: What is compact set?, Mike Kent, 02:11
- Re: So they lied, guenther vonKnakspot, 02:11
- Re: JSH: So they lied, guenther vonKnakspot, 02:08
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 01:56
- Re: Can you do it?, Michael Jørgensen, 01:53
- Calculus Homework Help, dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx, 01:41
- Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Tim Peters, 01:22
June 15, 2006
- Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Ryan Reich, 23:40
- Re: Homeomorphism, The World Wide Wade, 23:30
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, jstevh, 23:30
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Spoonfed, 23:29
- Re: To Decker and Peters, Spice Melange, 23:23
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 23:18
- Re: JSH: To Decker and Peters, Gib Bogle, 23:16
- Re: JSH: So they lied, ungernerik, 23:07
- Re: Can you do it?, Proginoskes, 22:56
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 22:53
- Re: JSH: So they lied, ungernerik, 22:48
- Re: JSH: To Decker and Peters, Tim Peters, 22:44
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, jstevh, 22:42
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 22:40
- Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, James Dolan, 22:38
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Spoonfed, 22:22
- Re: To Decker and Peters, The Last Danish Pastry, 22:21
- Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 22:17
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray, 22:05
- Re: elementary set theory, Igor Khavkine, 22:05
- Re: balls and metric, Ronald Bruck, 21:54
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 21:50
- Re: JSH: To Decker and Peters, jshsucks, 21:33
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Dik T. Winter, 21:25
- Re: JSH: To Decker and Peters, Justin, 21:24
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Dik T. Winter, 21:23
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Dik T. Winter, 21:19
- JSH: To Decker and Peters, jstevh, 21:18
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Dik T. Winter, 21:14
- THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE, ACE, 21:10
- Can you do it?, mike4ty4, 21:04
- Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Ryan Reich, 20:29
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:26
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, jstevh, 20:16
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 20:04
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Gene Ward Smith, 20:04
- Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 19:38
- Re: Probability Question, matt271829-news, 19:36
- Re: So they lied, Tim Peters, 19:18
- Re: Probability Question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:08
- Re: A Formula for T^k(n): Was: Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 19:01
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 18:54
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Proginoskes, 18:43
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Proginoskes, 18:39
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Proginoskes, 18:38
- Re: asymptotic evaluation of an integral, John Billingham, 18:33
- Re: Probability Question, matt271829-news, 18:24
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 18:07
- Re: So they lied, Lasse, 18:06
- Re: What is compact set?, jsher, 17:55
- Re: Residue Number System Arithmetic, Christian Siebert, 17:40
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Chip Eastham, 17:37
- Transit ridership to demographics, kbrotcke, 17:35
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray, 17:29
- Re: So they lied, The Last Danish Pastry, 17:29
- Re: Probability Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:26
- Re: So they lied, David Moran, 17:24
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 17:23
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Chip Eastham, 17:18
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 17:08
- Re: Probability Question, matt271829-news, 17:06
- Re: JSH: So they lied, The Last Danish Pastry, 16:53
- Re: JSH: So they lied, The Last Danish Pastry, 16:51
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Tim Peters, 16:48
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Patrick, 16:39
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Denis Feldmann, 16:25
- Re: JSH: So they lied, The Last Danish Pastry, 16:19
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Gene Ward Smith, 16:17
- Re: uniformly equicontinuous, The World Wide Wade, 16:09
- Re: Connecting semi-circles, BuddhaThu, 16:03
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 16:02
- Re: What is compact set?, Gonįalo Rodrigues, 15:49
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 15:41
- Re: What is compact set?, James Dolan, 15:31
- Re: JSH: So they lied, pomerado, 15:28
- stochastic question from cryptography, Jochen Stand, 15:28
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 15:19
- Re: Homeomorphism, Robert Israel, 14:59
- Re: How 3=2, Virgil, 14:58
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:53
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:50
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Finder, 14:47
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 14:44
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 14:35
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil, 14:26
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Denis Feldmann, 14:15
- Re: Weirdest graph?, Dave L. Renfro, 14:07
- Re: So they lied, The Last Danish Pastry, 14:05
- Re: JSH: So they lied, The Last Danish Pastry, 13:53
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 13:51
- Re: Homeomorphism, Andrew, 13:41
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Herman Rubin, 13:40
- Re: Is this space a Hausdorff space?, Herman Rubin, 13:33
- Re: How 3=2, Paul, 13:30
- Homeomorphism, Andrew, 13:22
- Re: Weirdest graph?, M.J.T. Guy, 13:20
- Re: Residue Number System Arithmetic, Pubkeybreaker, 13:11
- Re: Probability Question, Keith A. Lewis, 12:55
- Residue Number System Arithmetic, Jules César, 12:51
- Re: Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), Arturo Magidin, 12:50
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 12:37
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 12:24
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Lord Protector, 12:07
- Re: What is compact set?-, JEMebius, 12:04
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger, 12:01
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 11:55
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger, 11:55
- Re: JSH: So they lied, ungernerik, 11:45
- Re: Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), Arturo Magidin, 11:38
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 11:38
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 11:34
- Re: What is compact set?, Paul, 11:28
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 11:22
- Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Ryan Reich, 11:18
- Re: sum of cosines-, JEMebius, 11:16
- <a href="http://your-metronidazole.0catch.com">metronidazole</a>, qweqwe, 11:07
- Re: What is compact set?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:06
- Re: <a href="http://your-metronidazole.0catch.com">metronidazole</a>, qweqwe, 11:05
- Re: Weirdest graph?, Dave L. Renfro, 11:05
- <a href="http://your-metronidazole.0catch.com">metronidazole</a>, qweqwe, 10:59
- Re: Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), Stephen J. Herschkorn, 10:56
- Re: So they lied, stephen, 10:54
- Re: What is compact set?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:45
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, MET, 10:36
- Re: very nice math video, Michael Jørgensen, 10:33
- What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:29
- Re: Fuzzy Booleans with Application, Robert Low, 10:25
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, David C . Ullrich, 10:16
- Re: What is compact set?, Robert Low, 09:58
- Re: sum of cosines, Dik T. Winter, 09:55
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:47
- Re: Fuzzy Booleans with Application, William Elliot, 09:44
- Re: How 3=2, Larry Lard, 09:36
- What is compact set?, Linda, 09:31
- Re: Distance between segments, matt271829-news, 09:28
- Re: Fuzzy Booleans with Application, Han de Bruijn, 09:28
- Re: Distance between segments, matt271829-news, 09:21
- Re: Normal distribution function with skew and kurtosis, beliavsky, 08:49
- Re: So they lied, MTD, 08:45
- Re: Renormalization of Equality, Han . deBruijn, 08:35
- Re: JSH: So they lied, willo_thewisp, 08:34
- Re: sum of cosines, Bart, 08:31
- Fuzzy Booleans with Application, Han de Bruijn, 08:26
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Mary K, 08:23
- Re: sum of cosines, Bart Vandewoestyne, 08:17
- Re: sum of cosines, Dik T. Winter, 08:14
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, David C . Ullrich, 08:13
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Toni Lassila, 08:07
- Re: How 3=2, Robert Low, 08:06
- Re: So they lied, guenther vonKnakspot, 07:57
- Re: So they lied, Denis Feldmann, 07:48
- Re: So they lied, David Moran, 07:33
- Re: How 3=2, José Carlos Santos, 07:27
- Re: sum of cosines, Dik T. Winter, 07:27
- Re: How 3=2, Jussi Piitulainen, 07:26
- Re: JSH: So they lied, David C . Ullrich, 07:20
- How 3=2, anuragsaxenajpr, 06:55
- Re: sum of cosines, Patrick Coilland, 06:33
- Re: Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), xan2, 06:28
- Re: sum of cosines, William Elliot, 06:15
- Re: sum of cosines, Patrick Coilland, 06:12
- Re: Connecting semi-circles, b . fokke, 06:11
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 06:09
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger, 06:05
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Justin, 05:58
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger, 05:54
- Connecting semi-circles, b . fokke, 05:41
- sum of cosines, Bart, 05:29
- Curious properties of j-function formulas, titus_piezas, 05:28
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, The Last Danish Pastry, 05:21
- Re: So they lied, guenther vonKnakspot, 05:11
- Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 04:38
- Re: point yes/no within a specific area, Han de Bruijn, 04:37
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Proginoskes, 04:27
- Re: So they lied, The Last Danish Pastry, 04:24
- Re: JSH: So they lied, MTD, 04:23
- Re: point yes/no within a specific area, William Elliot, 04:13
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Bertie Reed, 04:12
- Re: JSH: So they lied, gjedwards, 04:12
- Re: point yes/no within a specific area, Randy Poe, 04:07
- Re: Weirdest graph?, William Elliot, 03:48
- Re: point yes/no within a specific area, martijn, 03:48
- point yes/no within a specific area, martijn, 03:42
- Re: JSH: So they lied, Gib Bogle, 03:21
- Re: JSH: So they lied, José Carlos Santos, 03:09
- JSH: So they lied, jstevh, 02:48
- Re: Defining a cumulative distribution function, Eli Luong, 02:32
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Joseph Hertzlinger, 02:19
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 02:03
- Re: uniformly equicontinuous, Stan Liou, 01:47
- Re: uniformly equicontinuous, Stan Liou, 01:34
- Re: uniformly equicontinuous, Robert Israel, 01:30
- Re: Defining a cumulative distribution function, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 01:16
- Re: Defining a cumulative distribution function, Stan Liou, 01:12
- Defining a cumulative distribution function, Eli Luong, 00:47
- Re: uniformly equicontinuous, NotP, 00:45
- uniformly equicontinuous, NotP, 00:42
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Mordechai Housman, 00:38
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Mordechai Housman, 00:32
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Joseph Littleshoes, 00:06
June 14, 2006
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Spoonfed, 23:38
- ? solving outgoing Helmholtz eqn using fft, Cheng Cosine, 23:37
- Re: Binomial and hypergeometric distributions, Eli Luong, 23:36
- Re: Binomial and hypergeometric distributions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 23:20
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Spoonfed, 22:59
- Binomial and hypergeometric distributions, Eli Luong, 22:49
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Gene Ward Smith, 22:34
- Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, William Elliot, 21:48
- Re: Affine and projective manifolds, Ken Pledger, 21:33
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, c5wangli, 21:15
- Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dave Rusin, 20:47
- Re: Probability Question, Julie P., 20:41
- Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dale Shoults, 20:32
- Re: Probability Question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:28
- Re: But what is truth?, The Last Danish Pastry, 20:11
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:04
- Re: But what is truth?, The Last Danish Pastry, 19:56
- Probability Question, Julie P., 19:53
- Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dale Shoults, 19:52
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:47
- generalized standard form for a conjecture, tommy1729, 19:46
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, David R Tribble, 19:43
- Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dale Shoults, 19:37
- Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Dale Shoults, 19:32
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, tommy1729, 19:30
- Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Dik T. Winter, 19:28
- Holder / L^p regularity, don, 19:20
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, tommy1729, 19:11
- Re: simple homeomorphism, David C . Ullrich, 19:09
- Re: Addition of complex roots, David C . Ullrich, 19:05
- Re: asymptotic evaluation of an integral, David C . Ullrich, 19:04
- Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, David C . Ullrich, 18:53
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, tommy1729, 18:41
- Re: Addition of complex roots, Dave Rusin, 18:30
- Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin, 18:19
- Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dave Rusin, 18:14
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray, 17:57
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 17:53
- OBVIOUS SPAM: CRUCIFIXION BY BANISHMENT, Raymond Karczewski, 17:24
- Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Gene Ward Smith, 17:12
- Re: simple homeomorphism, The World Wide Wade, 17:08
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 17:06
- Re: Basic Complex Analysis Question, José Carlos Santos, 17:04
- Re: Basic Complex Analysis Question, The World Wide Wade, 17:04
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 17:04
- Re: Basic Complex Analysis Question, Robert Israel, 17:03
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Proginoskes, 17:00
- Re: Getting into a top level grad school, pego, 16:57
- Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, jhnrmsdn, 16:57
- Re: ball surface integral, David Hartley, 16:48
- Affine and projective manifolds, Die Herren Rubens und Michel, 16:42
- Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, jhnrmsdn, 16:30
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Lobby Dosser, 16:21
- Re: ball surface integral, David Hartley, 16:06
- Basic Complex Analysis Question, James, 15:45
- simple homeomorphism, Litania, 15:40
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, MET, 15:34
- Re: Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), Arturo Magidin, 15:22
- Re: asymptotic evaluation of an integral, John Billingham, 15:21
- Is this space a Hausdorff space?, pkg, 15:17
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Herman Jurjus, 15:08
- Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), xan2, 15:02
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:52
- Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Arturo Magidin, 14:29
- ball surface integral, tamiry, 14:28
- Re: Addition of complex roots, manucito, 14:25
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:25
- Re: IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, tamiry, 14:20
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:17
- Re: asymptotic evaluation of an integral, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 14:16
- Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Dave Rusin, 14:08
- Re: Weirdest graph?, Dave L. Renfro, 14:06
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, martin cohen, 14:05
- Re: Addition of complex roots, Robert Israel, 14:04
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, ldb, 14:00
- Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Virgil, 13:19
- Re: Addition of complex roots, MTD, 13:19
- Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Dale Shoults, 13:18
- Re: Addition of complex roots, Peter L. Montgomery, 13:15
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 13:14
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Tim Peters, 13:06
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Robert J. Kolker, 13:04
- Re: Generalize Scalar Functions on Matrices, Robert Israel, 13:04
- Re: functional equation+derivable, Robert Sheskey, 12:36
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 12:34
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 12:25
- Re: Extensions of modules, Derek Holt, 12:07
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 12:00
- Addition of complex roots, manucito, 11:57
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 11:55
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Mordechai Housman, 11:44
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger, 11:43
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 11:35
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 11:20
- Magnetic Anyon Generators for Advanced Warp Propulsion?, Jack Sarfatti, 11:18
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Ross A. Finlayson, 11:15
- Re: Weirdest graph?, gjedwards, 10:46
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, aone1504, 10:44
- Re: Single player game theory?, Nathan, 10:42
- Re: asymptotic evaluation of an integral, John Billingham, 10:39
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Lee Rudolph, 10:32
- Re: Single player game theory?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:26
- Re: elementary set theory, Sere, 10:23
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 10:20
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Chip Eastham, 10:19
- Re: asymptotic evaluation of an integral, John Billingham, 10:16
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Dik T. Winter, 10:15
- Re: when can I replace this inf by min?, Dave Seaman, 10:10
- Re: how to calculate/list all fit values, john_woo, 10:00
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Narasimham, 09:55
- asymptotic evaluation of an integral, John Billingham, 09:53
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:48
- Single player game theory?, makc . the . great, 09:39
- Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, William Elliot, 09:31
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 09:25
- Re: elementary set theory, William Elliot, 09:15
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 09:08
- Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Dik T. Winter, 09:07
- Re: Extensions of modules, Michael Knudsen, 08:58
- Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, Robert Low, 08:47
- Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:46
- Re: when can I replace this inf by min?, G.E. Ivey, 08:40
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:39
- Re: elementary set theory, G.E. Ivey, 08:36
- Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, newsgroups.reader@xxxxxxxxx, 08:29
- Re: Homomorphism, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:29
- elementary set theory, Sere, 08:29
- Re: Homomorphism, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:28
- Re: Generalize Scalar Functions on Matrices, Gottfried Helms, 08:10
- Re: Pure math, factoring idea, veritas, 08:08
- Geodesic equalogram and geodesic half-equalogram, h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx, 08:05
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:04
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:57
- Re: Why is this true, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:44
- Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, David C . Ullrich, 07:14
- Re: when can I replace this inf by min?, David C . Ullrich, 07:09
- Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, David C . Ullrich, 07:03
- Re: function with compact support and it's Fourier transform, David C . Ullrich, 07:01
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 06:56
- Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, William Elliot, 06:54
- Re: But what is truth?, David C . Ullrich, 06:54
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, David C . Ullrich, 06:53
- Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, David C . Ullrich, 06:51
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, aone1504, 06:51
- Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 06:47
- Re: Convergence problem, Han . deBruijn, 06:40
- Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, Robert Low, 06:37
- Re: Extensions of modules, Derek Holt, 06:36
- Continuous maps and open/closed sets, newsgroups.reader@xxxxxxxxx, 06:18
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, Peter Spellucci, 06:17
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Robert Low, 06:17
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray, 06:08
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, T.H. Ray, 05:54
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, aone1504, 05:52
- Re: But what is truth?, Larry Lard, 05:48
- Re: But what is truth?, MTD, 05:40
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 05:18
- when can I replace this inf by min?, diegotorquemada, 04:59
- Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Lobby Dosser, 04:55
- very nice math video, 1gentle . giant, 04:52
- Minimum set of constraints in linear optimisation problem, Alec . Edgington, 04:10
- Distance between segments, zaknospam@xxxxxxxxx, 03:56
- Weirdest graph?, mike4ty4, 03:11
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Gene Ward Smith, 02:32
- Extensions of modules, Michael Knudsen, 02:04
- Re: independence of multiple events, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 02:02
- Re: Lipschitz continuity, Konrad Viltersten, 01:23
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Chip Eastham, 00:58
- Re: But what is truth?, Denis Feldmann, 00:49
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Denis Feldmann, 00:46
- Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Arturo Magidin, 00:25
June 13, 2006
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Gib Bogle, 23:59
- Correction:Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:59
- Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Hatto von Aquitanien, 23:43
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, tommy1729, 23:42
- Re: independence of multiple events, William Elliot, 23:37
- Re: independence of multiple events, Eli Luong, 23:10
- Re: independence of multiple events, William Elliot, 23:03
- Re: Generalize Scalar Functions on Matrices, Virgil, 23:00
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:50
- independence of multiple events, Eli Luong, 22:43
- Re: probability venn diagram question, Eli Luong, 22:40
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, tommy1729, 22:31
- SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Raymond Karczewski, 22:31
- Can you the Code?, thewwwcode, 22:17
- Re: JSH: So quiet, new factoring method or not?, tommy1729, 21:48
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, MET, 21:47
- Re: Indra's Net of Pearls, boson boss, 21:31
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally useful theory?, Rick Decker, 21:15
- Re: how to calculate/list all fit values, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:49
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, jstevh, 20:18
- Re: Is this a proof?, Dan, 20:08
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, David W . Cantrell, 19:55
- Re: But what is truth?, Gerry Myerson, 19:55
- Generalize Scalar Functions on Matrices, xyz91234, 19:54
- Re: how to calculate/list all fit values, john_woo, 19:48
- Re: Calculating a mean angle, David W . Cantrell, 19:22
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, david petry, 19:11
- Re: But what is truth?, Richard Tobin, 18:46
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 18:42
- Re: But what is truth?, Mary K, 17:47
- Re: l i t tle - he l p, Virgil, 17:44
- Re: l i t tle - he l p, Ludovico, 17:43
- Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Virgil, 17:40
- Re: probability venn diagram question, mathman, 17:05
- Re: l i t tle - he l p, The World Wide Wade, 17:01
- Re: But what is truth?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:53
- Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, Lee Rudolph, 16:53
- l i t tle - he l p, Ludovico, 16:50
- Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, Gene Ward Smith, 16:45
- probability venn diagram question, Eli Luong, 16:41
- Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Arturo Magidin, 16:14
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Lee Rudolph, 16:11
- Re: Is this a proof?, Proginoskes, 16:05
- Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, 1940LaSalle, 15:58
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 15:55
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:52
- Re: A Formula for T^k(n): Was: Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 15:50
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 15:45
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally useful theory?, Proginoskes, 15:45
- Re: Complex numbers inequality, mirthis, 15:40
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Bill Dubuque, 15:37
- conjecture: p-adics analysis = Real Analysis + variance Re: where biology becomes mathematics, a_plutonium, 15:34
- Re: Superposition of solutions in PDF, Robert Israel, 15:31
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:30
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Bill Dubuque, 15:28
- Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, 1940LaSalle, 15:24
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 15:19
- Re: But what is truth?, Dave Seaman, 15:15
- Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Virgil, 15:11
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, guenther vonKnakspot, 14:48
- Re: how to calculate/list all fit values, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:47
- Re: But what is truth?, Denis Feldmann, 14:47
- Re: Superposition of solutions in PDF, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:34
- Re: But what is truth?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:33
- how to calculate/list all fit values, john_woo, 14:32
- Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Arturo Magidin, 14:30
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:28
- Re: But what is truth?, Tim Peters, 14:28
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 14:25
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 14:21
- Re: Complex numbers inequality, The World Wide Wade, 14:18
- Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Hatto von Aquitanien, 14:17
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, zuhair, 14:10
- Re: But what is truth?, Virgil, 14:08
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Virgil, 14:02
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 14:01
- Re: function with compact support and it's Fourier transform, The World Wide Wade, 13:59
- Re: function with compact support and its Fourier transform, victor_meldrew_666, 13:57
- Re: stat question, syvanen@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:50
- Re: diagonal & side-bisectors in parallelogram, Count Dracula, 13:45
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Virgil, 13:42
- Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Pubkeybreaker, 13:39
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Lee Rudolph, 13:34
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Gene Ward Smith, 13:32
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 13:30
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 13:26
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:16
- Re: Infinity, Igor, 13:15
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:09
- Re: Indra's Net of Pearls, John Bailey, 13:08
- Re: Superposition of solutions in PDF, Lenore, 13:01
- Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Dave Rusin, 12:54
- Re: But what is truth?, The Last Danish Pastry, 12:47
- Re: But what is truth?, Denis Feldmann, 12:24
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Lee Rudolph, 12:13
- Re: Complex numbers inequality, Falagar, 12:09
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 12:03
- Re: Vertex/Intersection Polygon Game, Leroy Quet, 12:00
- function with compact support and it's Fourier transform, eugene, 12:00
- Complex numbers inequality, mirthis, 11:56
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Leroy Quet, 11:50
- Re: Superposition of solutions in PDF, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:49
- Re: But what is truth?, The Last Danish Pastry, 11:40
- Re: Japanese Temple Geometry, Hero, 11:30
- Re: Pet Ownership - Killing Through Kindness, Mike Schilling, 11:27
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, amzoti, 11:24
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 11:23
- Re: Condition number of positive definite matrix, Peter Spellucci, 11:21
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Robert J. Kolker, 11:20
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, mathedman, 11:04
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, David C . Ullrich, 10:59
- Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dale Shoults, 10:51
- Is this a proof?, Dan, 10:32
- Re: Lipschitz continuity, Dave L. Renfro, 10:30
- Re: Superposition of solutions in PDF, Lenore, 09:54
- Re: cross/dot product question, martin dowd, 09:53
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 09:24
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, imaginatorium, 09:16
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Chip Eastham, 09:04
- Re: JSH: Listening to investors, José Carlos Santos, 09:01
- Re: Lipschitz continuity, José Carlos Santos, 09:00
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Robert Low, 08:50
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Patrick Coilland, 08:49
- Re: Homomorphism, Lot-o-fun, 08:40
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, aone1504, 08:28
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:24
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 07:23
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 07:21
- Re: Infinity, G.E. Ivey, 06:59
- Re: What does the area under a curve actually mean?, denver, 06:25
- Re: Lipschitz continuity, David C . Ullrich, 06:16
- Re: Lipschitz continuity, David C . Ullrich, 06:15
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, David C . Ullrich, 06:13
- Re: Infinity, Michael, 06:08
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, David C . Ullrich, 06:03
- Re: IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 05:50
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Volker Boie, 05:49
- Re: Calculating a mean angle, Stan Liou, 05:37
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Aatu Koskensilta, 05:22
- Re: Calculating a mean angle, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 05:15
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Robert Low, 05:12
- Condition number of positive definite matrix, Shinchiro Izumi, 05:04
- Re: IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, MTD, 04:58
- Re: IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, MTD, 04:57
- Re: IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, tamiry, 04:56
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 04:55
- Re: diagonal & side-bisectors in parallelogram, tamiry, 04:47
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 04:47
- Re: Calculating a mean angle, Duncan Muirhead, 04:44
- Re: Calculating a mean angle, Stan Liou, 04:40
- Re: Infinity, MTD, 04:35
- Re: Cauchy method of residues for double integrals ?, JH, 04:19
- Infinity, Matlock, 04:17
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, MTD, 04:15
- Re: IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 04:06
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 03:38
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Abstract Dissonance, 03:33
- Re: sqrt(exp(x^2)-1) - a very positive function?, glenbarnett, 03:25
- Re: sqrt(exp(x^2)-1) - a very positive function?, Robert Israel, 03:09
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, aone1504, 03:04
- Re: interesting differential equations problem, Robert Israel, 02:56
- Calculating a mean angle, Scott, 02:51
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Bob Terwilliger, 02:33
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Gerry Myerson, 02:33
- Lipschitz continuity, Konrad Viltersten, 02:29
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 02:21
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Aatu Koskensilta, 02:14
- Re: Lipschitz continuity, José Carlos Santos, 02:12
- Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Gene Ward Smith, 01:28
- Re: sqrt(exp(x^2)-1) - a very positive function?, Peter L. Montgomery, 01:27
- JSH: But what is truth?, jstevh, 01:19
- Re: Matrix, ADM, 01:14
- Re: cross/dot product question, ADM, 01:09
- Re: Need help with the probability question?, William Elliot, 00:52
- Re: Search in equations, Chip Eastham, 00:23
June 12, 2006
- sqrt(exp(x^2)-1) - a very positive function?, glenbarnett, 23:06
- Re: cross/dot product question, Paul Sperry, 22:53
- Re: History of the Spinning Top?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 22:49
- Re: interesting differential equations problem, Dave Rusin, 22:39
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 22:39
- Re: Killer Sudoku, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 22:35
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray, 22:21
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Abstract Dissonance, 21:41
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 21:33
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 21:30
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 21:26
- Re: differential equation, kia, 21:21
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 21:16
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 21:15
- Re: Search in equations, bobm, 21:10
- Re: JSH: So I lose, Gib Bogle, 21:08
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 21:05
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Virgil, 21:01
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Amiey, 20:53
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Dann Corbit, 20:49
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, jstevh, 20:38
- Re: Questions about probability functions, Robert Israel, 19:54
- Re: Japanese Temple Geometry, Stan Rabinowitz, 19:49
- Re: differential equation+even, Robert Israel, 19:45
- Re: Superposition of solutions in PDF, Robert Israel, 19:27
- Re: Japanese Temple Geometry, gmarkowsky, 19:23
- Re: JSH: So I lose, litsohate, 19:19
- Re: Matrix, Ken Pledger, 19:10
- Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, marcus_b, 19:09
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, matt271829-news, 19:09
- Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, David C . Ullrich, 19:04
- Re: Murder in the name of the rose, Robert Israel, 19:02
- Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, litsohate, 19:00
- Re: Goedel's Proof and Transfinity, Arturo Magidin, 18:59
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 18:59
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, jhnrmsdn, 18:59
- Re: diagonal & side-bisectors in parallelogram, The Last Danish Pastry, 18:47
- Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:39
- Re: JSH: So I lose, Wayne Brown, 18:37
- Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, jhnrmsdn, 18:30
- Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Leroy Quet, 18:29
- Vertex/Intersection Polygon Game, Leroy Quet, 18:27
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Lee Rudolph, 18:21
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Gene Ward Smith, 18:16
- Re: Matrix, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:16
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Gene Ward Smith, 18:08
- Re: Goedel's Proof and Transfinity, Charlie, 18:03
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, David R Tribble, 17:55
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 17:55
- cross/dot product question, tamiry, 17:49
- Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, tommy1729, 17:42
- Goedel's Proof and Transfinity, vernonner3voltazim, 17:41
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Alexmcw, 17:37
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 17:37
- Force/Torque required to coil spring around mandrel., lmcgill2, 17:32
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Gene Ward Smith, 17:29
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, mathman, 17:17
- Re: does a mean vector exist?- Correction, JEMebius, 17:13
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, Martin Eisenberg, 17:07
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, tommy1729, 17:06
- Re: does a mean vector exist?-, JEMebius, 17:06
- diagonal & side-bisectors in parallelogram, tamiry, 17:05
- Re: Something a little more lighthearted!, lynX, 17:01
- Re: Need an an example of a function, Herman Rubin, 16:50
- CRITICAL TORUS !!!, tommy1729, 16:48
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Mike Kelly, 16:35
- Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Dave Rusin, 16:29
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 16:28
- Re: does a mean vector exist?, BuddhaThu, 16:18
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Albrecht, 16:02
- Re: Example+Fourier transform, Herman Rubin, 15:59
- Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Ulrich Diez, 15:58
- Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Falagar, 15:51
- Re: JSH: So I lose, N. Silver, 15:45
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:32
- Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Virgil, 15:30
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 15:25
- Re: OT: Soduko takes the country by storm!, israel, 15:24
- Re: Pure math, factoring idea, Amiey, 15:15
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Gene Ward Smith, 15:09
- Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Denis Feldmann, 15:02
- Re: exam results, StupidGenius, 14:57
- Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Pubkeybreaker, 14:45
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, h . tracy, 14:44
- Re: Another question for you - sample spaces, Robert Israel, 14:40
- OMEGA of the thermal field, T=2.7 K is 2/3, NILS BÖRJESSON, 14:39
- Re: Need an an example of a function, Patrick Coilland, 14:39
- Re: does a mean vector exist?, Virgil, 14:34
- Re: Why is this true, Bill Dubuque, 14:29
- Re: Another question for you - sample spaces, Virgil, 14:28
- Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, Dave L. Renfro, 14:28
- Realization of homomorphisms of measure algebras, Gonįalo Rodrigues, 14:26
- Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, Dave L. Renfro, 14:21
- Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, eugene, 14:20
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 14:19
- Re: Need an an example of a function, Robert Israel, 14:18
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Virgil, 14:13
- Re: differential equation+even, eugene, 14:13
- Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, Ronald Bruck, 14:12
- Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, G. A. Edgar, 14:11
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 14:11
- Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, David Moran, 14:09
- Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Dale Shoults, 14:08
- Re: Difficult limit question from an analysis qual, M.J.T. Guy, 14:04
- Re: differential equation+even, W. Dale Hall, 14:04
- Re: Questions about probability functions, Zerex71, 13:56
- Re: Provinf bounded variation, The World Wide Wade, 13:42
- Re: differential equation+even, Igor, 13:37
- Re: Why is this true, Dave Seaman, 13:20
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 13:17
- Derivatives of Bessel functions?, 1940LaSalle, 13:07
- Re: Why is this true, The Last Danish Pastry, 13:06
- Re: Cauchy method of residues for double integrals ?, Stephan W Mueller, 13:01
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, Peter Spellucci, 12:58
- Re: History of the Spinning Top?, Stephan W Mueller, 12:47
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, fernando revilla, 12:45
- Re: Need help with the probability question?, Proginoskes, 12:45
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Proginoskes, 12:30
- Re: Need an an example of a function, Patrick Coilland, 12:30
- Re: Murder in the name of the rose, Arturo Magidin, 12:25
- Re: THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE and if you took a, gwh, 12:23
- Re: Pure math, factoring idea, Proginoskes, 12:21
- Re: Questions about probability functions, Robert Israel, 12:15
- Re: Matrix-, JEMebius, 12:00
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 11:52
- Re: Why is this true, Richard Henry, 11:46
- Re: question about quaternions-, JEMebius, 11:24
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Nathan, 11:06
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, Julian V. Noble, 10:48
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, MET, 10:10
- Re: Indra's Net of Pearls, Rasta Robert, 10:05
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Dave L. Renfro, 09:59
- Another question for you - sample spaces, Zerex71, 09:46
- Re: Questions about probability functions, Zerex71, 09:43
- Re: Prime number distribution, Chip Eastham, 09:41
- Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, The Last Danish Pastry, 09:35
- Re: Prime number distribution, bert, 09:19
- Re: Need an an example of a function, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 09:05
- Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, Chip Eastham, 09:01
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, David C . Ullrich, 08:54
- Prime number distribution, jt64, 08:45
- Cauchy method of residues for double integrals ?, JH, 08:44
- Re: Ulam's Rose, Denis Feldmann, 08:41
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Norm Dresner, 08:38
- Re: Ulam's Rose, bert, 08:38
- Re: Why is this true, A N Niel, 08:21
- Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Falagar, 08:18
- Re: So I lose, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 08:17
- Re: Ulam's Rose, jt64, 08:12
- Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, David C . Ullrich, 08:12
- Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Kira Yamato, 08:11
- differential equation+even, eugene, 08:07
- Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Kira Yamato, 07:55
- Re: Ulam's Rose, bert, 07:34
- Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Falagar, 07:28
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, Patrick Coilland, 07:24
- Re: A basic question on real numbers, José Carlos Santos, 07:21
- A basic question on real numbers, aone1504, 06:55
- Re: An Optimization problem, saleem, 06:39
- Superposition of solutions in PDF, Lenore, 06:23
- Re: Ulam's Rose, jt64, 06:22
- Re: Another Reason Why Feinstein's Proof is Incorrect, matt271829-news, 06:20
- Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Kira Yamato, 06:19
- Re: Ulam's Rose, jt64, 06:11
- Re: Murder in the name of the rose, José Carlos Santos, 06:06
- Re: perelman poincare proof looks really solid, yato90, 06:03
- Murder in the name of the rose, jt64, 05:48
- Murder in the name of the rose, jt64, 05:48
- Re: Convergence problem, Han . deBruijn, 05:45
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 12, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:41
- Re: JSH: So I lose, gjedwards, 05:38
- Re: JSH: So I lose, Bertie Reed, 05:22
- Ulam's Rose, jt64, 04:44
- Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 04:44
- Ulam's Rose, jt64, 04:44
- Re: Matrix, Linda, 04:36
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Gene Ward Smith, 04:31
- Re: does a mean vector exist?, kunzmilan, 04:08
- Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, The Last Danish Pastry, 03:54
- Re: Japanese Temple Geometry, martijn, 03:48
- Re: Reed Solomon encoding, Jyrki Lahtonen, 03:29
- Anyons, Ghosts & World Holograms, Jack Sarfatti, 03:08
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Hello2006go, 03:03
- Re: Matrix, kunzmilan, 02:50
- Re: Provinf bounded variation, Konrad Viltersten, 02:21
- Re: ELO system, Hans Aberg, 02:18
- Matrix, Matlock, 02:13
- Matrix, Matlock, 02:12
- Matrix, Matlock, 02:12
- Re: Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., Robert Israel, 01:58
- Re: probability: inseparable events, multiple trials, AllenTechServices, 01:38
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 01:36
- Re: Why is this true, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 01:22
- Re: Why is this true, The World Wide Wade, 01:19
- Re: Difficult limit question from an analysis qual, The World Wide Wade, 01:01
- Re: general proof question, Stan Liou, 00:48
- Difficult limit question from an analysis qual, Snis Pilbor, 00:40
- Re: Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., Nathan Baulch, 00:36
- Re: Why is this true, Stan Liou, 00:25
- Re: Arranging m objects into n piles, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 00:17
- general proof question, vsgdp, 00:03
June 11, 2006
- Re: Arranging m objects into n piles, Stan Liou, 23:59
- Re: Cookbook for Ito calculus, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan, 23:55
- Why is this true, xyzer, 23:42
- Two-dimensional correlation analysis information, mondaymystery, 23:21
- minimal anisomorphism, SysTom, 23:19
- Re: Need an an example of a function, Chip Eastham, 23:03
- Arranging m objects into n piles, Sam, 22:20
- Re: Killer Sudoku, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster, 22:19
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, jstevh, 22:08
- Re: Integer solutions, William Elliot, 21:45
- Integer solutions, Deep, 21:15
- Re: THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE and if you took a, Amiey, 21:12
- Re: Need an an example of a function, Amiey, 21:10
- Re: History of the Spinning Top?, John Schutkeker, 21:09
- Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, Justin, 21:06
- Re: Need help with the probability question?, William Elliot, 20:51
- Re: History of the Spinning Top?, James Dolan, 20:47
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 20:39
- Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters, 19:38
- Re: Need an an example of a function, NotP, 19:33
- Re: Need an an example of a function, NotP, 19:32
- Re: So I lose, Richard Henry, 19:23
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, MET, 19:05
- Re: Need an an example of a function, Chip Eastham, 19:02
- Re: Need an an example of a function, Virgil, 18:59
- Re: Need an an example of a function, NotP, 18:41
- Re: A place for the curious, critical and bored., ytyourclothes, 18:39
- Re: THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE and if you took a, ytyourclothes, 18:37
- Re: History of the Spinning Top?, John Schutkeker, 18:37
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Mike Kelly, 18:34
- Re: Need an an example of a function, Rupert, 18:34
- Re: Need an an example of a function, Rupert, 18:32
- Re: JSH: So I lose, Tim Peters, 18:29
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Mike Kelly, 18:28
- Re: History of the Spinning Top?, Ken Pledger, 18:23
- Re: Singular Value Decomposition, Robert Israel, 18:20
- Need an an example of a function, NotP, 18:14
- Re: A place for the curious, critical and bored., Ken Pledger, 18:12
- Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, Ken Pledger, 17:59
- Re: JSH: So I lose, fishfry, 17:55
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, Robert Israel, 17:47
- Re: So I lose, The Last Danish Pastry, 17:44
- Re: uniform convergence, A N Niel, 17:35
- Japanese Temple Geometry, gmarkowsky, 17:31
- uniform convergence, robert, 17:26
- Re: S^n x |R parallelizable, Lee Rudolph, 17:14
- Need help with the probability question?, shawnee, 16:47
- Re: S^n x |R parallelizable, konstantin . schaedler, 16:47
- Re: JSH: So I lose, Matthijs Hebly, 16:44
- Re: probability: inseparable events, multiple trials, shadovv, 16:39
- Re: S^n x |R parallelizable, Lee Rudolph, 16:29
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Phil Carmody, 16:27
- Re: probability: inseparable events, multiple trials, N. Silver, 16:26
- probability: inseparable events, multiple trials, shadovv, 16:22
- S^n x |R parallelizable, konstantin . schaedler, 16:17
- Re: question about quaternions, Igor, 16:14
- Re: Provinf bounded variation, The World Wide Wade, 16:02
- Re: Example+Fourier transform, The World Wide Wade, 16:00
- Re: Singular Value Decomposition, Garrett Baird, 15:58
- Re: So I lose, John, 15:38
- Re: So I lose, N. Silver, 15:33
- Re: THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE and if you took a, John, 15:29
- Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, Tim Peters, 15:28
- Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Kira Yamato, 15:23
- JSH: So I lose, jstevh, 15:21
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, N. Silver, 15:15
- Re: Pure math, factoring idea, jstevh, 15:14
- Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, jstevh, 15:11
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, MET, 14:58
- Re: Indra's Net of Pearls, Ioannis, 14:55
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, Dave Dodson, 14:38
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Mike Kelly, 14:37
- Singular Value Decomposition, Sensei, 14:21
- Re: Indra's Net of Pearls, John Bailey, 14:11
- Re: Provinf bounded variation, Konrad Viltersten, 14:11
- THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE and if you took a, switzerland qunatium computer, 14:04
- Re: question about quaternions, Falagar, 13:59
- Re: basic question on affine algebraic varieties, Ted Hwa, 13:51
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, N. Silver, 13:49
- Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin, 13:45
- Re: orthogonal matrix+decomposition, eugene, 13:44
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Phil Carmody, 13:43
- Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Falagar, 13:42
- Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin, 13:28
- Re: orthogonal matrix+decomposition, Virgil, 13:07
- Re: Need some help with digits..., Virgil, 13:02
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Mike Kelly, 12:46
- Cookbook for Ito calculus, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:38
- Re: L^2 with a complex measure, A N Niel, 11:49
- Re: Provinf bounded variation, A N Niel, 11:41
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, Julian V. Noble, 11:38
- Re: Need some help with digits..., ytyourclothes, 11:31
- question about quaternions, eugene, 11:18
- Re: L^2 with a complex measure, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:12
- Re: Homomorphism, Lee Rudolph, 11:01
- are operators on complete distributive lattices continuous?, Tobias Matzner, 10:45
- Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Kira Yamato, 10:17
- Membership in a polynomial ring, Kira Yamato, 10:15
- Re: basic question on affine algebraic varieties, canadan, 10:14
- Homomorphism, Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:05
- Example+Fourier transform, eugene, 09:58
- Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, John, 09:33
- Re: Pure math, factoring idea, John, 09:28
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Denis Feldmann, 08:22
- Re: Another Reason Why Feinstein's Proof is Incorrect, GJ Woeginger, 08:13
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Lee Rudolph, 08:11
- Re: L^2 with a complex measure, David C . Ullrich, 08:05
- Re: Provinf bounded variation, Konrad Viltersten, 08:02
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 08:01
- Some examples in elementary ergodic theory., philippe, 07:52
- Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, David C . Ullrich, 07:50
- Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), phbouafia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 07:45
- a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), eugene, 07:41
- Topological Groups, William Elliot, 07:31
- Re: History of the Spinning Top?, John Bailey, 07:25
- Re: Need some help with digits..., Narcoleptic Insomniac, 06:53
- Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, Toni Lassila, 06:49
- Re: Provinf bounded variation, A N Niel, 06:41
- Re: orthogonal matrix+decomposition, eugene, 06:37
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato, 06:28
- Provinf bounded variation, Konrad Viltersten, 06:15
- Re: functional equation+derivable, Jannick Asmus, 06:10
- Re: functional equation+derivable, William Elliot, 06:10
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:51
- Re: functional equation+derivable, eugene, 05:47
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Jussi Piitulainen, 05:39
- Simpson Integration - a specific problem, MET, 05:35
- Re: Over $250 Free Poker, Casino Money - No deposits required, donstockbauer, 05:33
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, donstockbauer, 05:30
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Phil Carmody, 05:25
- Re: It looks simple but.., Dirk Van de moortel, 05:23
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Mike Kelly, 05:21
- Re: functional equation+derivable, William Elliot, 05:20
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Mike Kelly, 05:14
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Jussi Piitulainen, 05:05
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Mike Kent, 04:43
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 04:42
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Lee Rudolph, 04:36
- Over $250 Free Poker, Casino Money - No deposits required, Jim, 04:21
- Re: Need some help with digits..., Virgil, 04:16
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Jussi Piitulainen, 04:14
- functional equation+derivable, eugene, 04:10
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Virgil, 04:03
- Re: A number-theoretic inquiry, Robert Israel, 03:38
- Re: SF: More equations to check, no claims, José Carlos Santos, 03:31
- Re: Surrogate factoring, dead idea, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:18
- Re: Need some help with digits..., Denis Feldmann, 03:18
- Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, Larry Hammick, 03:00
- Re: basic question on affine algebraic varieties, Ted Hwa, 02:41
- Re: Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., Robert Israel, 02:34
- Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, Gene Ward Smith, 02:24
- Re: AN NWO EVENING OF SATANIC IGNORANCE: PROOF THAT THE WORLD HATES A CHRIST, Lobby Dosser, 02:11
- Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, Denis Feldmann, 02:05
- Need some help with digits..., ytyourclothes, 01:42
- Re: It looks simple but.., Peter Nachtwey, 01:29
- Re: basic question on affine algebraic varieties, canadan, 00:36
- Re: JSH: Surrogate factoring, dead idea, Tim Peters, 00:33
- Re: AN NWO EVENING OF SATANIC IGNORANCE: PROOF THAT THE WORLD HATES A CHRIST, Mordechai Housman, 00:29
- Re: Something a little more lighthearted!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:27
- Re: basic question on affine algebraic varieties, Ted Hwa, 00:17
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Proginoskes, 00:04
- basic question on affine algebraic varieties, canadan, 00:04
June 10, 2006
- Re: JSH: Pure math, factoring idea, Proginoskes, 23:57
- Something a little more lighthearted!, lynX, 23:51
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters, 23:51
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Proginoskes, 23:48
- Re: It looks simple but.., Proginoskes, 23:41
- Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, Proginoskes, 23:32
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Dave Seaman, 23:28
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Dave Seaman, 23:14
- JSH: Pure math, factoring idea, jstevh, 22:58
- A Formula for T^k(n): Was: Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 22:54
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 22:42
- Re: perelman poincare proof looks really solid, Al Mok, 22:41
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Proginoskes, 22:32
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Spoonfed, 22:17
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 21:11
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, rtonyreeder, 21:05
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:50
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:44
- Re: It looks simple but.., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:38
- Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, W. Dale Hall, 20:28
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, xyzer, 20:20
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 20:13
- JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, jstevh, 20:01
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Virgil, 19:57
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Virgil, 19:54
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Mark Spahn, 19:53
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Mark Spahn, 19:41
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, bill, 19:21
- Re: AN NWO EVENING OF SATANIC IGNORANCE: PROOF THAT THE WORLD HATES A CHRIST, Lobby Dosser, 19:03
- Re: Surrogate factoring, dead idea, José Carlos Santos, 19:00
- Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, Peter L. Montgomery, 18:58
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Thomas Mautsch, 18:51
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, david petry, 18:48
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 18:35
- Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, eugene, 18:33
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, h . tracy, 18:14
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:33
- Re: It looks simple but.., Peter Nachtwey, 17:33
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, rtonyreeder, 17:19
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, mathman, 17:19
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:06
- Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, Chip Eastham, 17:02
- Re: It looks simple but.., Dirk Van de moortel, 17:01
- Re: It looks simple but.., rip pelletier, 16:58
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Virgil, 16:48
- It looks simple but.., Peter Nachtwey, 16:19
- Re: History of the Spinning Top?, Dave L. Renfro, 16:17
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Dirk Van de moortel, 16:11
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters, 16:04
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, xyzer, 16:01
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Simeon Stefanov, 15:47
- Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Virgil, 15:38
- Re: Correlation Median and Mean value?, Virgil, 15:31
- Re: L^2 with a complex measure, francesco . cellarosi, 15:21
- Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, Arturo Magidin, 15:08
- Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, Tim Peters, 14:53
- Re: Correlation Median and Mean value?, matt271829-news, 14:52
- Re: Complex exponential function?, Chip Eastham, 14:50
- A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, xyzer, 14:49
- History of the Spinning Top?, Agent Smith, 14:46
- Re: Correlation Median and Mean value?, malcolm-fowler, 14:00
- Re: Random Variable??, Abstract Dissonance, 13:52
- Re: Random Variable??, A N Niel, 13:42
- Complex exponential function?, nimcha, 13:41
- Re: Chebychev inequality generalisation, eugene, 13:39
- Re: book or online page on factoring..., Dave Rusin, 13:38
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Denis Feldmann, 13:29
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, The World Wide Wade, 13:21
- Re: seperated-proper-complete, Jannick Asmus, 13:07
- L^2 with a complex measure, francesco . cellarosi, 12:17
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble, 12:05
- Re: " Solving 1 + p(1- p(x)) = g^[2](2 -x) , p known ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 12:00
- Re: spherical coordinates question, gwh, 11:43
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, David R Tribble, 11:40
- Reed Solomon encoding, sugolini, 11:21
- Re: " Solving 1 + p(1- p(x)) = g^[2](2 -x) , p known ", Patrick Coilland, 11:03
- Re: " Solving 1 + p(1- p(x)) = g^[2](2 -x) , p known ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 10:57
- Re: An ancient sudoku, hagen, 10:48
- Correlation Median and Mean value?, Pierre Bast, 10:01
- Re: A question in book Concrete Mathematics, William Elliot, 10:00
- Re: " Solving 1 + p(1- p(x)) = g^[2](2 -x) , p known ", Patrick Coilland, 09:56
- Random Variable??, group . fbi, 09:48
- Re: An Optimization problem, Abstract Dissonance, 09:08
- Re: " Solving 1 + p(1- p(x)) = g^[2](2 -x) , p known ", Patrick Coilland, 08:57
- Re: A question in book Concrete Mathematics, Abstract Dissonance, 08:56
- " Solving 1 + p(1- p(x)) = g^[2](2 -x) , p known ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 08:38
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, matt271829-news, 08:23
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger, 08:22
- Re: Chebychev inequality generalisation, David C . Ullrich, 08:20
- Re: integral of multiplied by sin(ax) or cos(ax), David C . Ullrich, 08:15
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 08:09
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger, 08:09
- Re: spherical coordinates question, matt271829-news, 07:47
- Re: route planners, martijn, 07:26
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray, 07:17
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato, 06:59
- An Optimization problem, saleem, 06:57
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato, 06:51
- Re: A question in book Concrete Mathematics, Denis Feldmann, 06:50
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, William Elliot, 06:46
- Re: A question in book Concrete Mathematics, A N Niel, 06:38
- Re: Golbal moderation, donstockbauer, 06:34
- Re: A question in book Concrete Mathematics, William Elliot, 06:29
- Re: An integer sequence, sttscitrans, 06:19
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news, 06:06
- Re: Nicer proof in basic topology?, William Elliot, 06:02
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Denis Feldmann, 05:55
- Re: Polytopes, Abstract Dissonance, 05:39
- A question in book Concrete Mathematics, LUK, 05:39
- Re: optimization, William Elliot, 05:38
- Polytopes, Abstract Dissonance, 05:23
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Simeon Stefanov, 05:05
- Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, eugene, 03:43
- Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, eugene, 03:39
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, denis feldmann, 03:39
- A number-theoretic inquiry, joseabdris, 03:36
- Re: Verification needed, simple algebra, Jasen Betts, 03:14
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Phil Carmody, 02:36
- Re: Online Mathematics Encyclopedias, titus_piezas, 01:03
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Bryan Olson, 01:00
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Gottfried Helms, 00:41
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium, 00:14
June 09, 2006
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 23:40
- Re: elementary proof of FLT, Chip Eastham, 22:33
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Chip Eastham, 22:25
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, David R Tribble, 22:21
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble, 22:13
- Re: perelman poincare proof looks really solid, anothertimeanotherplace, 22:10
- Re: can someone help me out with this problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 22:02
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble, 22:00
- Re: perelman poincare proof looks really solid, saebock, 21:59
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Oscar Lanzi III, 21:50
- can someone help me out with this problem, sching, 21:49
- Re: elementary proof of FLT, Dik T. Winter, 21:27
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Proginoskes, 21:02
- Re: elementary proof of FLT, Proginoskes, 20:56
- Re: orthogonal matrix+decomposition, Fedor, 20:38
- Re: A place for the curious, critical and bored., magic math tricks, 20:35
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Chip Eastham, 20:33
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Chip Eastham, 20:31
- Re: elementary proof of FLT, Chip Eastham, 20:19
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Proginoskes, 20:14
- Re: elementary proof of FLT, Proginoskes, 20:11
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 20:09
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, mia . mujezinovic, 20:08
- Re: Calculus problem, shawn, 20:00
- Re: An integer sequence, Proginoskes, 19:44
- Re: An integer sequence, Proginoskes, 19:40
- Re: Calculus problem, shawn, 19:34
- Re: Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., Proginoskes, 19:32
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Proginoskes, 19:29
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, mia . mujezinovic, 19:18
- Re: Calculus problem, qubit101, 19:17
- Re: route planners, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:15
- Re: route planners, skuesey, 19:14
- Re: A place for the curious, critical and bored., Ioannis, 19:10
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, mia . mujezinovic, 19:03
- Re: Calculus problem, matt271829-news, 19:00
- Re: route planners, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:56
- Re: Calculus problem, matt271829-news, 18:54
- Re: Calculus problem, skuesey, 18:51
- A place for the curious, critical and bored., jonthn, 18:48
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Alexmcw, 18:42
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Nathan, 18:38
- Re: Calculus problem, Harry, 18:24
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Virgil, 18:24
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Kees, 18:21
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, mia . mujezinovic, 18:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 18:08
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Nathan, 18:04
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Nathan, 17:48
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Chip Eastham, 17:48
- Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Toni Lassila, 17:44
- Re: ? is this e-problem, Cheng Cosine, 17:37
- Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, mia . mujezinovic, 17:33
- Re: What does the area under a curve actually mean?, Maja, 17:31
- Calculus problem, shawn, 17:29
- Re: Does this kind of function exist?, José Carlos Santos, 17:07
- Re: Field of fractions (was: Re: Proofs by induction and infinity), Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 16:04
- Point group symmetry of a labelled graph from automorphism group?, maneesh, 16:02
- Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, Bill Dubuque, 15:59
- Re: optimization, Abstract Dissonance, 15:58
- Re: elementary proof of FLT, Chip Eastham, 15:56
- Re: integral of multiplied by sin(ax) or cos(ax), Robert Israel, 15:42
- Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 15:42
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news, 15:36
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:33
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Robert J. Kolker, 15:28
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, The World Wide Wade, 15:22
- Re: Is it identity?, Dave L. Renfro, 15:22
- Re: Is it identity?, BuddhaThu, 15:17
- Re: elementary proof of FLT, groebnerbases, 15:13
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 15:13
- Re: Is it identity?, BuddhaThu, 15:12
- Re: Correlation, Robert Israel, 15:09
- Re: JSH: SF: Does this work?, Tim Peters, 15:09
- Re: stat question, Robert Israel, 15:07
- Re: Online Mathematics Encyclopedias, Robert J. Kolker, 14:57
- Re: elementary proof of FLT, Chip Eastham, 14:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Gene Ward Smith, 14:51
- Re: optimization, Chip Eastham, 14:45
- Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, Arturo Magidin, 14:43
- Re: Does this kind of function exist?, Patrick Coilland, 14:40
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Herman Rubin, 14:39
- Re: Statistics questions, Ray Koopman, 14:35
- not algebraically closed field and polynomial, eugene, 14:35
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Jussi Piitulainen, 14:32
- Re: Correlation, Ray Koopman, 14:25
- orthogonal matrix+decomposition, eugene, 14:22
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 14:20
- Re: Is it identity?, Artur, 14:18
- Re: Fields awardee Shing-Tung Yau lied in Chinese media about Poincare conjecture proof's attribution, qm, 14:09
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Virgil, 14:09
- Re: elementary proof of FLT, Toni Lassila, 14:08
- Re: stat question, Herman Rubin, 14:00
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 14:00
- route planners, martijn, 13:57
- Re: elementary proof of FLT, Arturo Magidin, 13:56
- Re: elementary proof of FLT, G. A. Edgar, 13:55
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 13:49
- elementary proof of FLT, funfpga, 13:48
- Re: Statistics Question, Robert Israel, 13:45
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 13:44
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Mark Spahn, 13:43
- Re: book or online page on factoring..., Peter L. Montgomery, 13:42
- Re: optimization, Abstract Dissonance, 13:41
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, matt271829-news, 13:38
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:28
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Robert Israel, 13:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Herman Rubin, 13:15
- Re: solving a system of linear equations, Robert Israel, 13:07
- Re: optimization, Chip Eastham, 12:55
- Re: Is it identity?, Dave L. Renfro, 12:48
- Re: spherical coordinates question, Duncan Muirhead, 12:44
- book or online page on factoring..., Bart, 12:42
- Re: Separable metric space + uncountably many sets, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:39
- Re: Online Mathematics Encyclopedias, martin cohen, 12:39
- Is it identity?, V.Murugan, 12:35
- Re: Does this kind of function exist?, Michel Hack, 12:35
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 12:29
- Re: How many (minimum) arithmetic progressions descompose a set?, martin cohen, 12:28
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Pubkeybreaker, 12:26
- Re: Nicer proof in basic topology?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:23
- Re: Does this kind of function exist?, M.J.T. Guy, 12:23
- Methods for solving quadratic equations, Dave L. Renfro, 12:16
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, tomhcmi, 12:13
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 12:11
- spherical coordinates question, Evan, 12:04
- Field of fractions (was: Re: Proofs by induction and infinity), Peter L. Montgomery, 11:59
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Frank J. Lhota, 11:57
- Re: Normal distribution function with skew and kurtosis, Reef Fish, 11:48
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 11:27
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, marcus_b, 10:53
- Re: how to prove this, Konstantin Syskov, 10:51
- Re: how to prove this, Konstantin Syskov, 10:51
- interesting differential equations problem, rajamohan82, 10:22
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Narasimham, 10:19
- Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, Toni Lassila, 10:05
- Re: Normal distribution function with skew and kurtosis, Greg Heath, 09:44
- Re: Separable metric space + uncountably many sets, José Carlos Santos, 09:41
- Re: after beginner's algebra, where to?, Rufi_Dukes, 09:40
- Re: Correlation, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 09:36
- Separable metric space + uncountably many sets, eugene, 09:29
- Re: optimization, Abstract Dissonance, 09:27
- Re: Trigonomety Question, A N Niel, 09:25
- Re: Trigonomety Question, Cap_Kirk, 09:16
- Chebychev inequality generalisation, eugene, 09:07
- Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, Paul, 09:02
- integral of multiplied by sin(ax) or cos(ax), eugene, 09:01
- Re: optimization, Chip Eastham, 08:59
- Trigonomety Question, carkaci, 08:56
- Re: solve laplace by fourier transform,, Cap_Kirk, 08:56
- Re: An integer sequence, eugene, 08:50
- Re: optimization, Abstract Dissonance, 08:48
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 08:43
- How about using the Web to create a mathematical genome?, mpcohen, 08:41
- Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, jaapsch, 08:38
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 08:32
- Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, David C . Ullrich, 08:25
- Re: Statistics Question, Sarah moore, 08:18
- Re: optimization, William Elliot, 08:11
- Correlation, lilo, 08:10
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 07:52
- Re: Nicer proof in basic topology?, William Elliot, 07:42
- Re: stat question, Olli Lehtonen, 07:38
- Re: Convergence problem, Han . deBruijn, 07:36
- Re: Statistics Question, Torsten Hennig, 07:17
- Re: An integer sequence, Pubkeybreaker, 07:06
- Re: How many (minimum) arithmetic progressions descompose a set?, xan2, 07:03
- Re: Statistics Question, Sarah moore, 07:01
- An integer sequence, eugene, 06:57
- Re: super simple i'm sure: what does this mean when it say "values" exactly?, Lee Rudolph, 06:44
- Re: Statistics Question, Torsten Hennig, 06:32
- Re: super simple i'm sure: what does this mean when it say "values" exactly?, José Carlos Santos, 06:31
- Re: bayesians versus frequentists, T.H. Ray, 06:31
- Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, guenther vonKnakspot, 06:25
- super simple i'm sure: what does this mean when it say "values" exactly?, ben, 06:19
- Re: Measure Theory, Lee Rudolph, 05:47
- Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, joseabdris, 05:39
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, ezcos, 05:33
- Proofs by induction and infinity, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 05:29
- Re: Does this kind of function exist?, Patrick Coilland, 05:10
- sell nfl jerseys, nba jerseys, soccer jerseys,polo t-shirt,bape jeans and b, sell_jerseys, 05:09
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato, 05:06
- Re: Does this kind of function exist?, José Carlos Santos, 05:03
- Re: Does this kind of function exist?, Patrick Coilland, 04:58
- Statistics Question, Sarah moore, 04:52
- Re: Does this kind of function exist?, Patrick Coilland, 04:51
- Re: Does this kind of function exist?, José Carlos Santos, 04:38
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 04:28
- [OT] Re: Statistics questions, Micha Keijzers, 04:20
- Does this kind of function exist?, ziman137, 04:08
- Re: perelman poincare proof looks really solid, pgiacome@xxxxxxxxx, 03:49
- Re: ? is this e-problem, Alois Steindl, 03:42
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 03:16
- Re: ? is this e-problem, Cheng Cosine, 03:11
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters, 02:53
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 02:49
- Re: solving a system of linear equations, Virgil, 02:37
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:33
- Re: Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., Robert Israel, 02:29
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:22
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:20
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, The World Wide Wade, 02:20
- Re: Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., John Garrideb, 01:58
- Online Mathematics Encyclopedias, titus_piezas, 01:52
- Re: optimization, Abstract Dissonance, 01:50
- Nicer proof in basic topology?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 01:28
- Re: Normal distribution function with skew and kurtosis, Robert Israel, 01:18
- Re: A constructivist's view of numbers and sets, William Elliot, 01:04
- Re: optimization, William Elliot, 01:01
- Re: [NT] How many (minimum) arithmetic progressions descompose a set?, Gerry Myerson, 00:48
- Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., Nathan Baulch, 00:41
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Proginoskes, 00:34
- Re: solving a system of linear equations, Proginoskes, 00:29
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Richard Henry, 00:13
June 08, 2006
- optimization, Abstract Dissonance, 23:49
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Gib Bogle, 23:40
- Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, joseabdris, 23:27
- Re: Measure Theory, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:32
- Off topic: a good one, Larry Hammick, 22:25
- perelman poincare proof looks really solid, vznuri, 22:12
- Re: Conics - Parabola, Shaynelle, 21:47
- Re: Conics - Parabola, Shaynelle, 21:37
- Re: solving a system of linear equations, Roy, 21:19
- Question about: Re: Harris spaces., Dik T. Winter, 21:15
- solve laplace by fourier transform,, vsgdp, 21:01
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Lee Rudolph, 20:51
- Looking for a surjection or R^2, Denis Feldmann, 20:17
- Re: Conics - Parabola, Lee Rudolph, 20:11
- Re: Conics - Parabola, Virgil, 20:11
- Re: Conics - Parabola, Dann Corbit, 20:10
- ELO system, sav, 20:07
- Re: ? is this e-problem, Cheng Cosine, 20:05
- Normal distribution function with skew and kurtosis, Phil Sherrod, 20:04
- Re: JSH: SF: Does this work?, Tim Peters, 19:58
- Conics - Parabola, Shaynelle, 19:56
- looking, jonlyda, 19:56
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Proginoskes, 19:53
- Re: ? is this e-problem, Virgil, 19:52
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, matt271829-news, 19:44
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Proginoskes, 19:40
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news, 19:38
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 19:33
- Re: surrogate factoring, Proginoskes, 19:07
- Re: solving a system of linear equations, Dann Corbit, 19:07
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, José Carlos Santos, 19:04
- Can you help me calculate the odds?, CoreyWhite, 18:59
- Re: Fourier transform, david petry, 18:53
- Chapline's dark star compared to Sarfatti's theory, Jack Sarfatti, 18:52
- Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, Tim Peters, 18:31
- ? is this e-problem, Cheng Cosine, 18:18
- solving a system of linear equations, Roy, 18:08
- Re: A constructivist's view of numbers and sets, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:53
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, matt271829-news, 17:47
- Re: Fractions, Bugman, 17:28
- Re: EFM: Products of derangements, Derek Holt, 17:13
- Re: PDE solution help, zine_smith, 17:04
- Re: Cosines, Gene Ward Smith, 17:02
- Re: differential equation, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:58
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 16:53
- Re: JSH: SF: Easy math, theory behind the solution, Tim Peters, 16:44
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters, 16:27
- A constructivist's view of numbers and sets, John Jones, 16:16
- Re: Largest numbers are Fun!, John Jones, 16:14
- Re: Largest numbers are Fun!, John Jones, 16:12
- Re: how to prove this, funfpga, 15:52
- Re: how to prove this, funfpga, 15:38
- Re: field extension Hungerford problem, Arturo Magidin, 15:15
- Re: differential equation, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 15:11
- Re: Cosines, Jules, 15:10
- Re: field extension Hungerford problem, nullgraph, 15:10
- Re: Cosines, Jules, 14:56
- Re: How to calculate (estimate) sigma from lot data, Ray Koopman, 14:56
- Re: Fractions, Arturo Magidin, 14:43
- Re: Cosines, A N Niel, 14:43
- Fractions, tekhneek, 14:41
- Cosines, Jules, 14:21
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, jshsucks, 14:19
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Lot-o-fun, 14:14
- Re: How to calculate (estimate) sigma from lot data, Virgil, 14:11
- Cool puzzles, Ioannis, 13:48
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil, 13:48
- Re: line eq'n, Virgil, 13:35
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 13:05
- Re: Pedal Triangles, Maury Barbato, 12:48
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato, 12:43
- Wrong Reason for the Right Answer; was (Re: Funny wrong proofs), Reef Fish, 12:25
- Re: Largest numbers are Fun!, The Qurqirish Dragon, 12:23
- Re: Statistics questions, Georg Anton, 12:16
- Re: Statistics questions, Patrick Coilland, 12:08
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Paul Sperry, 12:02
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, JoeS, 12:00
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker, 11:43
- Re: Statistics questions, The Qurqirish Dragon, 11:42
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 11:37
- Re: The Numbers Game, Reef Fish, 11:35
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Richard Henry, 11:33
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 11:23
- Re: The Numbers Game, fret, 11:08
- Fourier transform, hyderabadblues, 10:59
- Re: Mathematica code for an exponential sum graph, Dave L. Renfro, 10:13
- Re: exam results, StupidGenius, 10:06
- Re: Convergence problem, Han de Bruijn, 10:06
- How to calculate (estimate) sigma from lot data, Georg Anton, 10:04
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David Bernier, 09:51
- Statistics questions, Sonja Elen Kisa, 09:45
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Larry Lard, 09:40
- Re: The secret of series, Gottfried Helms, 09:39
- Re: exam results, Dave Seaman, 09:37
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 09:26
- Re: Largest numbers are Fun!, cody . roux, 09:22
- Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, rtonyreeder, 09:21
- how to prove this, Qijun, 09:09
- Re: line eq'n, sizors_1, 09:08
- Re: Pedal Triangles, Maury Barbato, 09:01
- Re: Pedal Triangles, Maury Barbato, 09:01
- Re: line eq'n, David W . Cantrell, 08:57
- Re: exam results, ang1, 08:50
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Mike Kelly, 08:48
- Re: surrogate factoring, gjedwards, 08:44
- Re: Largest numbers are Fun!, gjedwards, 08:40
- The secret of series, Mubashir, 08:33
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker, 08:16
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 08:14
- Re: Series question, David C . Ullrich, 08:11
- Re: exam results, David Moran, 08:10
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David Bernier, 08:04
- Re: Series question, David C . Ullrich, 08:03
- exam results, ang1, 07:56
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 07:43
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David Moran, 07:41
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 07:40
- Re: fourier series for rectified sine wave, David C . Ullrich, 07:40
- Re: prove that B[a,b] is not separable., David C . Ullrich, 07:38
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 07:34
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich, 07:33
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, David C . Ullrich, 07:30
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, William Elliot, 07:11
- Ulam's Conjecture - proof, slug, 07:10
- Re: [NT] How many (minimum) arithmetic progressions descompose a set?, William Elliot, 06:53
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David C . Ullrich, 06:37
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David C . Ullrich, 06:34
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David Bernier, 06:21
- Re: PDE solution help, Abstract Dissonance, 06:19
- Re: PDE solution help, Torsten Hennig, 06:18
- Re: Pedal Triangles, John Garrideb, 05:59
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Denis Feldmann, 05:56
- [NT] How many (minimum) arithmetic progressions descompose a set?, xan2, 05:51
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Bart, 05:49
- Series question, ManOfLight, 05:34
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato, 05:22
- Pedal Triangles, Maury Barbato, 05:18
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Larry Lard, 05:17
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Jesse F. Hughes, 05:16
- Re: Help with elliptic curve y^2 = p^3-34p^2+225p, Gene Ward Smith, 05:04
- Re: PDE solution help, Michael Jørgensen, 04:59
- Re: understanding PDE Problem statement,, Abstract Dissonance, 04:53
- Re: prove that B[a,b] is not separable., José Carlos Santos, 04:39
- Re: understanding PDE Problem statement,, Abstract Dissonance, 04:36
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, José Carlos Santos, 04:29
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, José Carlos Santos, 04:23
- fourier series for rectified sine wave, benn4321, 04:08
- Re: SF: Easy math, theory behind the solution, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:54
- Re: Help with elliptic curve y^2 = p^3-34p^2+225p, titus_piezas, 03:50
- Re: [ATTENTION] DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance, 03:40
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, jstevh, 03:37
- prove that B[a,b] is not separable., gilevgi, 03:32
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Abstract Dissonance, 03:29
- Re: surrogate factoring, jstevh, 03:28
- Re: Renormalization of Equality, Han de Bruijn, 03:24
- Re: PDE solution help, Torsten Hennig, 03:19
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, Larry Hammick, 03:12
- Re: Help with elliptic curve y^2 = p^3-34p^2+225p, Gene Ward Smith, 03:11
- Re: alternatives to logistic growth, Torsten Hennig, 03:11
- Re: Help with elliptic curve y^2 = p^3-34p^2+225p, Gene Ward Smith, 02:59
- Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jannick Asmus, 02:59
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 02:47
- Help with elliptic curve y^2 = p^3-34p^2+225p, titus_piezas, 02:26
- Re: Combinatorial Probability Question, Patrick Coilland, 01:44
- Re: Funny wrong proofs, William Elliot, 01:40
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:15
- understanding PDE Problem statement,, quat, 01:01
- Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, Cheng Cosine, 00:17
- Re: surrogate factoring, Proginoskes, 00:06
- Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, Cheng Cosine, 00:02
June 07, 2006
- Re: Probability, Reef Fish, 23:45
- Re: JSH [ATTENTION] DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, N. Silver, 23:39
- Re: JSH [ATTENTION] DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Peter Webb, 23:19
- Probability, Jackie Chan, 23:19
- Re: Andre Weil and his three conjectures, Chip Eastham, 23:14
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker, 22:29
- Re: infinite integral help, quat, 22:09
- Re: Combinatorial Probability Question, Stan Liou, 22:07
- Re: infinite integral help, The World Wide Wade, 21:44
- Re: line eq'n, uberclay, 21:43
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 21:19
- infinite integral help, quat, 21:14
- Re: Largest numbers are Fun!, Justin, 21:09
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:53
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith, 20:47
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Spoonfed, 20:41
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters, 20:30
- Re: Discretization on PDEs, quat, 19:59
- p-Laplacian, don, 19:43
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Spoonfed, 19:42
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble, 19:37
- Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, Gerry Myerson, 19:32
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble, 19:32
- Re: ulam's conjecture, Gerry Myerson, 19:25
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble, 19:18
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gerry Myerson, 19:14
- Re: need help with differential equations, widmar, 18:57
- Re: surrogate factoring, Tim Peters, 18:54
- Andre Weil and his three conjectures, David Bernier, 18:40
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 18:37
- Re: Indra's Net of Pearls, Ioannis, 18:37
- Re: anybody got an IQ over 200 here?, David R Tribble, 18:21
- Re: Mathematica code for an exponential sum graph, amzoti, 18:19
- Re: line eq'n, David W . Cantrell, 18:15
- Largest numbers are Fun!, John Jones, 18:11
- Largest numbers are Fun!, John Jones, 18:10
- Mathematica code for an exponential sum graph, Dave L. Renfro, 18:10
- Re: how to train intuition, John Thingstad, 17:52
- Re: Indra's Net of Pearls, Ioannis, 17:47
- Re: Curtis' Miracle Octad Generator, PaulHjelmstad, 17:43
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Reef Fish, 17:40
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro, 17:39
- Re: Question, Phil Carmody, 17:39
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Robert J. Kolker, 17:29
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Phil Carmody, 17:28
- how to train intuition, flaxroot, 17:19
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Lee Rudolph, 17:16
- Re: Indra's Net of Pearls, Skywise, 17:15
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro, 17:12
- Re: Renormalization of Equality, david petry, 17:01
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro, 17:00
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Lee Rudolph, 16:59
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, magic math tricks, 16:55
- Re: I was wrong all along, Harry, 16:39
- Re: stat question, syvanen@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:39
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, The World Wide Wade, 16:17
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 16:15
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, The World Wide Wade, 16:14
- Re: field extension Hungerford problem, Arturo Magidin, 16:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 16:04
- Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Milah, 15:57
- Re: Another silly question, Patrick Coilland, 15:56
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 15:55
- line eq'n, sizors_1, 15:41
- Discretization on PDEs, Eric, 15:40
- Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Milah, 15:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 15:25
- Re: field extension Hungerford problem, nullgraph, 15:17
- Re: Another silly question, Tony, 15:11
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:10
- Re: Another silly question, Patrick Coilland, 14:50
- Re: Stamp values and postal prices - rather puzzling, The Qurqirish Dragon, 14:49
- Gravity Force - obsolete idea, Jack Sarfatti, 14:49
- Re: Another silly question, bill, 14:44
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, T Wake, 14:21
- Re: EFM: Products of derangements, Chip Eastham, 14:11
- Referee's Query, Ioannis, 14:01
- Re: after beginner's algebra, where to?, Dave L. Renfro, 13:50
- Re: how to understand all the "phism"s, flaxroot, 13:49
- PDE solution help, zine_smith, 13:47
- Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 13:44
- Re: Measure Theory, ArtflDodgr, 13:39
- Re: Another silly question, Robert Israel, 13:29
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker, 13:27
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker, 13:16
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato, 13:09
- Re: field extension Hungerford problem, Arturo Magidin, 13:05
- Re: field extension Hungerford problem, mskirvin, 12:55
- Re: field extension Hungerford problem, Arturo Magidin, 12:39
- field extension Hungerford problem, nullgraph, 12:34
- Re: projection on L_p norm space., Littldarln, 12:15
- Re: EFM: Products of derangements, Derek Holt, 12:15
- Re: Combinatorial Probability Question, Chip Eastham, 12:10
- Re: f*conj(f) - g*conj(g) = 0, what follows for f/g ?, Robert Israel, 11:58
- Re: how to understand all the "phism"s, Chip Eastham, 11:58
- Re: Measure Theory, Dave L. Renfro, 11:49
- Re: surrogate factoring, gjedwards, 11:47
- Re: questions in using fmincom of Matlab, José Carlos Santos, 11:44
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Patrick Coilland, 11:40
- Combinatorial Probability Question, David B . Chorlian, 11:38
- EFM: Products of derangements, Chip Eastham, 11:34
- Measure Theory, Lord Protector, 11:28
- Re: alternatives to logistic growth, Name And Address Supplied, 11:23
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Herman Rubin, 11:20
- The most ambitious sudoku ever, hagen, 11:17
- questions in using fmincom of Matlab, ambra . chow, 11:17
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Jesse F. Hughes, 11:17
- Re: surrogate factoring, Ulrich Diez, 10:55
- Re: S^1 is differential manifold-, LuckyOne, 10:51
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker, 10:51
- Re: alternatives to logistic growth, Torsten Hennig, 10:44
- Re: bayesians versus frequentists, Toni Lassila, 10:37
- Re: how to understand all the "phism"s, José Carlos Santos, 10:33
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Randy, 10:32
- Re: Poincare Conjecture proof by Xiping Zhu and Huaidong Cao, Edwin Clark, 10:22
- how to understand all the "phism"s, flaxroot, 10:18
- alternatives to logistic growth, Name And Address Supplied, 10:15
- Re: Indra's Net of Pearls, Ioannis, 10:11
- Re: Discrete Hyperbolic Surface Model, Narasimham, 10:09
- Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, rtonyreeder, 10:08
- Re: bayesians versus frequentists, Lee Rudolph, 10:04
- Re: bayesians versus frequentists, Toni Lassila, 09:49
- Re: need help with differential equations, Chip Eastham, 09:49
- Funny wrong proofs, José Carlos Santos, 09:43
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, Tom Traubert, 09:36
- Re: I was wrong all along, José Carlos Santos, 09:35
- Re: [ATTENTION] DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, David C . Ullrich, 09:23
- Re: S^1 is differential manifold-, JEMebius, 09:15
- Poincare Conjecture proved by Zhu. He used a tool from me., The Free, 09:04
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, David C . Ullrich, 09:03
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David C . Ullrich, 09:01
- Re: Math Induction Method, Narek Saribekyan, 09:00
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, guenther vonKnakspot, 08:52
- Re: surrogate factoring, gjedwards, 08:51
- Re: S^1 is differential manifold-, Lee Rudolph, 08:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Herman Jurjus, 08:37
- Re: high/low vector of Lie algebra representation, Jyrki Lahtonen, 08:33
- ulam's conjecture, drochom, 08:31
- Re: S_n permutation group, bargiax, 08:09
- Re: A New Definition of Prime Number, Pubkeybreaker, 08:01
- Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jose Capco, 07:55
- Re: minimal polynomials, Timothy Murphy, 07:35
- Re: Indra's Net of Pearls, John Bailey, 07:32
- Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, boggom, 07:20
- Re: surrogate factoring, Denis Feldmann, 07:15
- Re: surrogate factoring, Richard Henry, 07:13
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance, 07:11
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Richard Henry, 07:02
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 07:00
- Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), William Elliot, 06:48
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, matt271829-news, 06:35
- surrogate factoring, gjedwards, 06:30
- Re: S^1 is differential manifold, Lee Rudolph, 06:14
- Re: Another silly question, Patrick Coilland, 06:04
- Re: bayesians versus frequentists, T.H. Ray, 05:51
- Re: f*conj(f) - g*conj(g) = 0, what follows for f/g ?, Holger Merkel, 05:49
- Re: early reference for minimization of quadratic form, vanamali, 05:27
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, Phineas T Puddleduck, 05:23
- Re: Another silly question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 05:19
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance, 04:55
- Re: f*conj(f) - g*conj(g) = 0, what follows for f/g ?, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 04:43
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Larry Lard, 04:42
- Renormalization of Equality, Han de Bruijn, 04:40
- Re: need help with differential equations, Michael Jørgensen, 04:00
- Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, Paul Smith, 04:00
- Re: f*conj(f) - g*conj(g) = 0, what follows for f/g ?, Holger Merkel, 03:55
- Re: div thm,, Michael Jørgensen, 03:42
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, MTD, 03:37
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Bertie Reed, 03:36
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:31
- Re: anybody got an IQ over 200 here?, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:24
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance, 03:14
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance, 03:12
- Re: Another silly question, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 03:04
- Re: Another silly question, Patrick Coilland, 03:01
- Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Hagen, 03:01
- Re: Another silly question, Patrick Coilland, 02:44
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Patrick Coilland, 02:41
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Erasmus \"The Mannequin\" Brown, 02:40
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Mark Garrett, 02:38
- Re: Another silly question, Patrick Coilland, 02:24
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:21
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, magic math tricks, 01:58
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, ensenadajim, 01:51
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Patrick Coilland, 01:43
- Re: div thm,, quat, 01:37
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, guenther vonKnakspot, 01:30
- Re: div thm,, Someonekicked, 01:26
- Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, Robert Israel, 01:20
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance, 01:18
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance, 01:15
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Proginoskes, 01:11
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 01:09
- Re: Stamp values and postal prices - rather puzzling, mensanator@xxxxxxx, 01:00
- Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jose Capco, 00:59
- Re: div thm,, quat, 00:56
- Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:49
- Re: div thm,, karl, 00:39
- Re: Stamp values and postal prices - rather puzzling, Richard Henry, 00:39
- Re: minimal polynomials, Robert Israel, 00:34
- Re: div thm,, karl, 00:30
- Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, joseabdris, 00:18
- [ATTENTION] DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance, 00:18
- Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, joseabdris, 00:04
June 06, 2006
- Re: S_n permutation group, Robert Israel, 23:48
- Re: S^1 is differential manifold, Meg Weiss, 23:46
- minimal polynomials, Anvita, 23:44
- Re: A New Definition of Prime Number, Robert Israel, 23:37
- Re: ? Green's func for Helmholtz eqn, rtonyreeder, 23:29
- Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, donstockbauer, 22:57
- Re: need help with differential equations, Chip Eastham, 22:47
- Re: S_n permutation group, Chip Eastham, 22:40
- CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, Raymond Karczewski, 22:13
- Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, Cheng Cosine, 22:03
- Re: why so many proofs look similar, Herman Rubin, 21:59
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, jstevh, 21:56
- ? Green's func for Helmholtz eqn, Cheng Cosine, 21:49
- Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Herman Rubin, 21:49
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, Phineas T Puddleduck, 21:39
- Re: S^1 is differential manifold, Meg Weiss, 21:39
- Re: stat question, Herman Rubin, 21:37
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, magic math tricks, 21:35
- Re: Another silly question, Robert Israel, 21:22
- Re: S_n permutation group, bargiax, 21:22
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, jstevh, 21:20
- Re: differential equation, Ken Pledger, 21:14
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, stephen, 21:03
- div thm,, quat, 20:57
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker, 20:54
- Re: f*conj(f) - g*conj(g) = 0, what follows for f/g ?, Robert Israel, 20:54
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, Phineas T Puddleduck, 20:52
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, Bob Cain, 20:51
- Re: Guess a number..., Gerry Myerson, 20:51
- Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, matt271829-news, 20:44
- Re: Verification needed, simple algebra, jstevh, 20:29
- Re: S_n permutation group, Chip Eastham, 20:08
- Re: Another silly question, brian . bargh, 19:58
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, William Hughes, 19:51
- S_n permutation group, bargiax, 19:27
- Re: I want to learn math..., uberclay, 19:26
- Re: need help with differential equations, widmar, 19:00
- Re: high/low vector of Lie algebra representation, Timothy Murphy, 18:59
- Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato, 18:48
- Re: binomial problem?, Gerry Myerson, 18:38
- Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, matt271829-news, 18:34
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, The World Wide Wade, 18:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 18:23
- Re: A New Definition of Prime Number, marian, 18:20
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, stephen, 18:16
- Re: need help with differential equations, Chip Eastham, 18:15
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, T Wake, 18:10
- Re: differential equation, David C . Ullrich, 18:06
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, magic math tricks, 18:02
- need help with differential equations, rajamohan82, 17:38
- Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:33
- Re: Another silly question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 17:24
- Re: Character theory question, g.s., 17:24
- Re: Basis for Hilbert space, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:57
- Re: Another silly question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 16:55
- Re: Another silly question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 16:54
- Re: Another silly question, Reef Fish, 16:47
- Re: differential equation, LuckyOne, 16:44
- Re: Another silly question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 16:42
- differential equation, Fedor, 16:38
- Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, boggom, 16:36
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 16:32
- Re: Can you find this integral for me?, Gene Ward Smith, 16:30
- Another silly question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 16:29
- Re: Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 16:26
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, albstorz, 16:25
- Re: Can you find this integral for me?, The Last Danish Pastry, 16:19
- Re: Collatz Question, bill, 16:15
- Re: Another silly question, David W . Cantrell, 16:11
- calling mathematica's FindRoot function from an external program, peregrine_falcon12, 16:00
- Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jannick Asmus, 15:47
- stat question, syvanen@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:46
- binomial problem?, Computers Guru, 15:43
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Pubkeybreaker, 15:43
- Re: S^1 is differential manifold, LuckyOne, 15:38
- Re: Can you find this integral for me?, Wood, 15:38
- Re: Question on slowly varying functions, pego, 15:32
- Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Chip Eastham, 15:31
- Re: Another silly question, David W . Cantrell, 15:30
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium, 15:30
- Re: f*conj(f) - g*conj(g) = 0, what follows for f/g ?, Holger Merkel, 15:29
- Re: Can you find this integral for me?, David W . Cantrell, 15:22
- Re: Question, Chip Eastham, 15:17
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium, 15:07
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 15:04
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Ioannis, 14:57
- Re: Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:57
- Re: JSH: But what if I AM right?, Proginoskes, 14:54
- Re: Can you find this integral for me?, David W. Cantrell, 14:53
- Re: Stamp values and postal prices - rather puzzling, Proginoskes, 14:51
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 14:50
- Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Proginoskes, 14:44
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 14:43
- S^1 is differential manifold, Meg Weiss, 14:40
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 14:40
- Can you find this integral for me?, Wood, 14:36
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 14:34
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 14:29
- Re: Math Induction Method, James Waldby, 14:24
- Re: Math Induction Method, James Waldby, 14:21
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 14:20
- Re: Math Induction Method, Jean-Marc Gulliet, 14:15
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 14:12
- Taxonomy of Cellular Automata, UberPuppy, 14:06
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 14:05
- Re: Fields awardee Shing-Tung Yau lied in Chinese media about Poincare conjecture proof's attribution, jhnrmsdn, 14:05
- Re: Question, Robert Israel, 13:54
- Re: Question about generation of real numbers, Michael Stemper, 13:53
- Re: algebra: identify function, Narasimham, 13:47
- Re: Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 13:47
- Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:46
- Re: Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:37
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters, 13:34
- Re: Writing in Circle, Don Taylor, 13:32
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow, 12:38
- Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:38
- algebra: identify function, hhesse, 12:29
- Re: localization of the already localized ring., Arturo Magidin, 12:29
- Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, Dave L. Renfro, 12:23
- Lie algebras, representations, Lionel Brits, 12:08
- Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, David W . Cantrell, 11:36
- Re: Question, amzoti, 11:06
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker, 11:01
- Re: Writing in Circle, Me, 10:52
- Re: localization of the already localized ring., Marc Olschok, 10:47
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium, 10:46
- Re: Poincare Conjecture proof by Xiping Zhu and Huaidong Cao, elvira . mayordomo, 10:45
- Re: Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 10:43
- Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, Paul Smith, 10:36
- Re: business calculus problem, Micha Keijzers, 10:27
- Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, carlos, 10:13
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium, 10:10
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker, 10:09
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 10:09
- Re: ? Maxwell eqn in inhomo media, rtonyreeder, 10:03
- Re: Question, Christian Siebert, 10:00
- Re: Verification needed, simple algebra, Bertie Reed, 09:59
- Re: I want to learn math..., Dave L. Renfro, 09:53
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium, 09:49
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium, 09:47
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow, 09:46
- Re: logistic map equation over Q_p, JoeS, 09:46
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow, 09:46
- why so many proofs look similar, flaxroot, 09:44
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, David C . Ullrich, 09:41
- Re: Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 09:34
- Re: inverse fourier xform by convolution, David C . Ullrich, 09:33
- Re: Math Induction Method, hayk, 09:33
- Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, rtonyreeder, 09:31
- Re: Question, Ian Parker, 09:22
- Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), Volker Boie, 09:13
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow, 09:12
- Re: I want to learn math..., Pious Audio, 09:12
- Re: Math Induction Method, karl, 09:10
- Re: How do i prove that an equation have only one rational root?, David C . Ullrich, 09:08
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow, 09:06
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow, 09:01
- Math Induction Method, Narek Saribekyan, 09:00
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow, 08:46
- Re: Question, Dik T. Winter, 08:38
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow, 08:34
- Re: does a mean vector exist?, Han de Bruijn, 08:31
- localization of the already localized ring., Jose Capco, 08:28
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow, 08:24
- Re: Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 08:15
- Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Dave L. Renfro, 08:08
- Re: seperated-proper-complete, sjang, 08:07
- Re: Question, Ian Parker, 07:50
- Re: Question, Dik T. Winter, 07:49
- Re: Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 07:38
- seperated-proper-complete, sjang, 07:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Herman Jurjus, 07:31
- Re: Question, Christian Siebert, 07:31
- Re: Question, Dik T. Winter, 07:29
- Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 07:17
- Re: The list of all natural numbers don't exist, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:01
- Re: high/low vector of Lie algebra representation, Jyrki Lahtonen, 06:59
- logistic map equation over Q_p, pgiacome@xxxxxxxxx, 06:53
- Re: does a mean vector exist?, Seán O'Leathlóbhair, 06:40
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Lord Protector, 06:35
- Re: Stamp values and postal prices - rather puzzling, Seán O'Leathlóbhair, 06:33
- Re: ZF: Does a minimal spanning set for consistency's undecidability exist?, William Elliot, 06:31
- Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), William Elliot, 06:21
- [OT] Stamp values and postal prices - rather puzzling, Will, 06:20
- Re: " Solving the equation 1 -4*h(x)^2 = h( 3*(1-x^2) ) , h unknown ", Patrick Coilland, 06:18
- Re: " Solving the equation 1 -4*h(x)^2 = h( 3*(1-x^2) ) , h unknown ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 06:06
- Question on slowly varying functions, ManOfLight, 05:58
- Re: does a mean vector exist?, Jack, 05:52
- Re: does a mean vector exist?, drmwecker, 05:34
- Re: does a mean vector exist?, Abstract Dissonance, 04:55
- Re: intersection, Ulysse from CH, 04:52
- Re: union of prime ideals, Ulysse from CH, 04:52
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Patrick Coilland, 04:31
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Patrick Coilland, 04:28
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, eugene, 04:18
- Re: Basis for Hilbert space, Ulysse from CH, 04:17
- Re: Basis for Hilbert space, Ulysse from CH, 04:09
- Re: quick ODE question, Ulysse from CH, 04:09
- Re: Common sense, checking of math "proofs", Jasen Betts, 04:07
- Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jose Capco, 03:45
- Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), Volker Boie, 03:37
- Re: does a mean vector exist?, Jack, 03:03
- Re: ? best approx of matrix of a linear sys, Torsten Hennig, 02:51
- Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Gerry Myerson, 02:43
- Re: does a mean vector exist?, Jack, 02:09
- ZF: Does a minimal spanning set for consistency's undecidability exist?, Dan, 01:34
- ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, Cheng Cosine, 01:22
- Re: ? Maxwell eqn in inhomo media, Cheng Cosine, 01:14
- Re: does a mean vector exist?, Harry, 01:03
- Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, Gene Ward Smith, 01:01
- Re: Basis for Hilbert space, Robert Israel, 00:51
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium, 00:37
- does a mean vector exist?, Jack, 00:36
- Re: Decompsition of a linear operator., Robert Israel, 00:30
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium, 00:03
June 05, 2006
- Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, Tim Peters, 23:54
- Re: JSH: Understanding the pathology, Tim Peters, 23:38
- Re: Business Calculus Problem less the typo, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 23:35
- Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Chip Eastham, 23:34
- Re: Basis for Hilbert space, mvonkann2000, 23:27
- Re: Verification needed, simple algebra, Proginoskes, 23:05
- Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters, 23:04
- Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, Gene Ward Smith, 22:54
- Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Proginoskes, 22:51
- Re: Collatz Question, Proginoskes, 22:47
- Basis for Hilbert space, zeros, 22:45
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Ken Pledger, 22:40
- Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, Bruce Ikenaga, 22:25
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Reef Fish, 22:20
- Re: I want to learn math..., Gerry Myerson, 22:18
- Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, Dave Seaman, 22:16
- Business Calculus Problem less the typo, Mkajuma, 21:53
- Re: I want to learn math..., uberclay, 21:48
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:42
- Re: business calculus problem, David Moran, 21:32
- WITM - Web Interface to Mathematica, Dave (from the UK), 21:23
- Re: Verification needed, simple algebra, jstevh, 21:17
- Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Dik T. Winter, 21:05
- Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Min, 20:30
- Re: JSH: But what if I AM right?, Min, 20:30
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, matt271829-news, 20:17
- Re: Writing in Circle, uberclay, 20:07
- business calculus problem, Mkajuma, 19:56
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, T Wake, 19:51
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Robert J. Kolker, 19:49
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble, 19:46
- Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Jesse F. Hughes, 19:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:41
- Re: JSH: Learning consensus, litsohate, 19:32
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble, 19:32
- Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:27
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 19:25
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, magic math tricks, 19:25
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble, 19:23
- Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, magic math tricks, 19:22
- 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dale Shoults, 19:21
- Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, Gerry Myerson, 19:20
- Character theory question, g.s., 19:08
- Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, Richard Tobin, 19:06
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble, 19:02
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble, 19:02
- Re: I want to learn math..., Gerry Myerson, 18:59
- Re: Sum, rtonyreeder, 18:57
- Re: Sum, Gerry Myerson, 18:55
- Re: Sum, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:54
- Re: Collatz Question, Proginoskes, 18:50
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 18:50
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes, 18:48
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 18:46
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Gottfried Helms, 18:40
- Writing in Circle, Me, 18:38
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 18:36
- Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Proginoskes, 18:36
- Re: True or False, Ken Pledger, 18:31
- Sum, John Stivenson, 18:30
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 18:30
- Re: Common sense, checking of math "proofs", Proginoskes, 18:28
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 18:26
- Re: Verification needed, simple algebra, Proginoskes, 18:24
- Re: How and where can i get help in calculus?, Ken Pledger, 18:20
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 18:19
- derive this formula, bgold, 18:10
- Re: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Gib Bogle, 17:59
- Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Phil Carmody, 17:58
- Re: Number Theory, Phil Carmody, 17:55
- Re: Common sense, checking of math "proofs", litsohate, 17:51
- Re: Prime ideals of tensor products, Jannick Asmus, 17:48
- Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jannick Asmus, 17:28
- Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com, 17:28
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 17:26
- Re: Decompsition of a linear operator., leox, 17:20
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 17:19
- Re: Collatz Question, bill, 17:15
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro, 17:03
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news, 16:51
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro, 16:48
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 16:39
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 16:25
- Re: Question about generation of real numbers, Dave Seaman, 16:20
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, The World Wide Wade, 16:18
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil, 16:17
- Re: Character theory question, Derek Holt, 16:07
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro, 16:05
- Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, wkaras, 16:03
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro, 15:57
- Re: Question about generation of real numbers, Robert Israel, 15:56
- Re: Some questions about lim..., The World Wide Wade, 15:50
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow, 15:46
- Re: I want to learn math..., Christopher J. Henrich, 15:41
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow, 15:24
- Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, Gene Ward Smith, 15:22
- Re: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Christopher J. Henrich, 15:21
- Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein, 15:14
- Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, victor_meldrew_666, 15:11
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow, 15:06
- Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Gene Ward Smith, 15:04
- Re: continious function, improper integral+bounded, The World Wide Wade, 14:45
- Re: evaluation of limits, G. A. Edgar, 14:35
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, A N Niel, 14:33
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, The World Wide Wade, 14:33
- Re: continious function, improper integral+bounded, A N Niel, 14:32
- Re: Getting into a top level grad school, A N Niel, 14:30
- Re: I want to learn math..., amzoti, 14:30
- Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Dave L. Renfro, 14:29
- Re: Derivative/Integral of x^x, Ioannis, 14:23
- Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Patrick Coilland, 14:22
- Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Lee Rudolph, 14:13
- Re: Getting into a top level grad school, daniel . svoboda, 13:44
- Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Mike Kelly, 13:42
- Re: Ptolemy inequality in a prehilbert space, eugene, 13:41
- Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:40
- continious function, improper integral+bounded, eugene, 13:35
- Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, Dave Seaman, 13:35
- preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, eugene, 13:34
- Re: Verification needed, simple algebra, Harry, 13:31