| Subject: | Re: Meaning of (In)completeness and (In)consistency in Godel's Logic |
|---|---|
| From: | Aatu Koskensilta |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:56:28 +0300 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.math |
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote: There are formal systems in which the Liar's Paradox cannot even be stated. Now that's an understatement! -- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx) "Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: JSH: How can they care?, David C . Ullrich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Hausdorff and compact, William Elliot |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Meaning of (In)completeness and (In)consistency in Godel's Logic, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Meaning of (In)completeness and (In)consistency in Godel's Logic, Aatu Koskensilta |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |