| Subject: | Re: Halmos Lin Algebra Problem - clarification |
|---|---|
| From: | "LuckyOne" |
| Date: | 29 Apr 2006 18:02:02 -0700 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.math |
>>>> But - how could V be a vector space, whatever the scalar multiplication > rule? Surely Rplus is not a group (no zero, no additive inverses)? Does > Halmos' vector addition rule make the set V a comutative group? Yes. In this case the zero element is the real number 1. If a>0, it's inverse is 1/a. *** I used to give this problem to my undergrads. Halmos' statement is absolutely true and it makes one (you) stop thinking of vectors as pointy objects. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: JSH: How can they care?, LuckyOne |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Halmos Lin Algebra Problem - clarification, Guy Corrigall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Halmos Lin Algebra Problem - clarification, ceckhard |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Halmos Lin Algebra Problem - clarification, Guy Corrigall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |