sci.math (date)
January 31, 2006
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 16:07
- Re: DOT PRODUCT., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:07
- Re: DOT PRODUCT., jeuro2, 16:05
- Re: Age in days., Michael, 16:00
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:59
- Re: Y=XZ, how to compute Pr{y-c<=Y<=y+c | x-c<=X<=x+c}?, Roy, 15:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:40
- Re: Y=XZ, how to compute Pr{y-c<=Y<=y+c | x-c<=X<=x+c}?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:35
- Re: Hilbert's Geometry Axioms, gwlucky, 15:32
- Y=XZ, how to compute Pr{y-c<=Y<=y+c | x-c<=X<=x+c}?, Roy, 15:28
- Equivalence definition of chain homotopy, Patt, 15:27
- Re: nth term of a Series when d is not constant, Jonny Realad, 15:26
- Re: Hilbert's Geometry Axioms, Ken Pledger, 15:24
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:22
- Re: nth term of a Series when d is not constant, Jeff, 15:16
- DOT PRODUCT., jeuro2, 15:15
- Re: nth term of a Series when d is not constant, gwlucky, 15:03
- Re: nth term of a Series when d is not constant, Patrick Coilland, 15:02
- Re: Packing problem, news.skynet.be, 14:57
- Re: nth term of a Series when d is not constant, Jeff, 14:56
- Re: nth term of a Series when d is not constant, Patrick Coilland, 14:49
- Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, Ken Pledger, 14:48
- Re: JSH: The first to tender his resignation from the JSH movement *was myself.*, Gib Bogle, 14:44
- nth term of a Series when d is not constant, Jeff, 14:42
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:38
- Re: Packing problem, Robert Israel, 14:32
- Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Marc Olschok, 14:29
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Ken Quirici, 14:26
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 14:26
- Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Marc Olschok, 14:12
- Re: Card pairing probabilities, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:10
- Re: laplace equation, Robert Israel, 13:53
- Re: Help with recursion, David C. Ullrich, 13:51
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 13:50
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 13:45
- Re: Reflexive Vector Space, David C. Ullrich, 13:44
- Re: Help with recursion, Robert Israel, 13:44
- Re: Generalized Inverses and Underdetermined Systems, junoexpress, 13:39
- Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Marc Olschok, 13:29
- Re: the doors, The World Wide Wade, 13:29
- Re: Question: List of all possible reduction between NP problems, stephen, 13:18
- Reflexive Vector Space, bbmcmung, 13:09
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Tim Peters, 13:09
- Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, Robert Israel, 13:08
- Re: Generalized Inverses and Underdetermined Systems, jw12jw12jw12, 13:07
- Re: Packing problem, gwlucky, 13:00
- Re: linear algebra, Herb Martin, 13:00
- Re: Help with recursion, Chip Eastham, 13:00
- Re: Packing problem, news.skynet.be, 12:53
- Re: Packing problem, Randy Poe, 12:50
- Re: the doors, georgie, 12:48
- Re: Problems finding out the area of a 0.5mm circle., Markus Moll, 12:48
- Re: Fourier transform of a frequency dependent gaussian function, Robert Israel, 12:43
- Re: Age in days., Michael Orion, 12:40
- Re: the doors, Keith A. Lewis, 12:38
- Re: Need help: Binomial Coefficients Problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:36
- Re: So weak, Habib Salappa, 12:31
- Re: Packing problem, gwlucky, 12:29
- Re: Fourier transform of a frequency dependent gaussian function, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:23
- Packing problem, news.skynet.be, 12:23
- Re: Fourier transform of a frequency dependent gaussian function, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:20
- Re: Help with recursion, Robert Israel, 12:17
- the close resemblance of Kepler packing and 4 Color Mapping; dependent variables in the Proposition-Statement, a_plutonium, 12:13
- Question: List of all possible reduction between NP problems, moti_ba, 12:10
- Generalized Inverses and Underdetermined Systems, junoexpress, 11:56
- Re: Hilbert's Geometry Axioms, gwlucky, 11:50
- Emergent Gravity, Jack Sarfatti, 11:48
- Re: Need help on functional derivative, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:46
- Re: differential equation question, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 11:34
- Re: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY: THE UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS,CHEMISTRY,BIOLOGY, AND MATHEMATICS, a_plutonium, 11:31
- Re: Problems finding out the area of a 0.5mm circle., David C . Ullrich, 11:30
- Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 11:25
- laplace equation, quat, 11:19
- Re: linear algebra, Arturo Magidin, 11:08
- Re: Problems finding out the area of a 0.5mm circle., Justin, 11:05
- Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, dave, 11:00
- The Multidimensional Man, jnadiaz, 10:57
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 10:55
- Re: Trascendental equation, David W . Cantrell, 10:44
- Re: linear algebra, gwlucky, 10:37
- Re: So weak, Mot Datrix, 10:31
- Re: If pi never repeats..., Dave L. Renfro, 10:28
- Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Jeffrey Rolland, 10:16
- Re: Pi contains a secret code !, mathedman, 10:14
- Re: linear algebra, Arturo Magidin, 10:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Chip Eastham, 10:06
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Randy Poe, 09:57
- Re: linear algebra, gwlucky, 09:40
- Re: the doors, Robert Low, 09:38
- Re: linear algebra, Arturo Magidin, 09:36
- Re: Need help: Binomial Coefficients Problem, tutorny, 09:32
- Substitution system spacehogs, Hauke Reddmann, 09:28
- Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, Keith A. Lewis, 09:24
- the doors, william108, 09:17
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Bill Dubuque, 09:11
- Re: So weak, David Moran, 08:53
- Egyptian fractions, as remainders, Milo Gardner, 08:33
- Re: what is a summand, Robert Low, 08:28
- Problems finding out the area of a 0.5mm circle., johnpeterson02, 08:27
- Re: what is a summand, Dave Seaman, 08:10
- Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Jyrki Lahtonen, 07:59
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Dave Seaman, 07:47
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Bill Hobba, 07:40
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Bill Hobba, 07:38
- Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Kees, 07:10
- Re: Mathematical Expressions for American Democracy, William Elliot, 07:07
- Re: Need help: Binomial Coefficients Problem, tutorny, 07:06
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 07:02
- Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, kj, 06:43
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 06:42
- PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY: THE UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS,CHEMISTRY,BIOLOGY, AND MATHEMATICS, NILS BÖRJESSON, 06:37
- Re: linear algebra, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 06:36
- Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, kj, 06:24
- Re: JSH: So weak, Justin, 06:19
- Age in days., Michael, 06:18
- Re: JSH: So weak, David C . Ullrich, 06:08
- Re: what is a summand, David C . Ullrich, 05:58
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Damir, 05:55
- Re: what is a summand, David C . Ullrich, 05:55
- Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, José Carlos Santos, 05:52
- Re: Pi contains a secret code !, tadchem, 05:41
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, David C . Ullrich, 05:31
- need a good metric over my definiutions matrix, nikhilbhargav_nsit, 05:30
- row/column notation in dual space, Bouwman, 05:28
- Re: More or Less Than the Sum of Its Parts, Clifford J. Nelson, 05:24
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, David C . Ullrich, 05:24
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 05:24
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, David C . Ullrich, 05:16
- Re: Card pairing probabilities, Michael Harrington, 05:11
- Re: Fourier transform of a frequency dependent gaussian function, csimon, 04:50
- Deducted from Wilson, carel, 04:48
- Re: Pi contains a secret code !, Synn, 04:12
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Harry, 04:07
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Harry, 04:06
- Re: Card pairing probabilities, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 03:56
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:50
- Re: differential equation question, asdf, 03:46
- Re: Formal proof of 0<1 for ordered field, MoeBlee, 03:44
- Re: Is my calculus right?, schoenfeld1, 03:37
- Re: dot product = |a| |b| cos(-) true for any dimensional space?, Robert Low, 03:29
- Re: Ideals of Products, Jose Capco, 03:24
- Re: Expected value, PARASHAR, 03:22
- Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, Proginoskes, 03:21
- Re: Is my calculus right?, schoenfeld1, 03:17
- Re: Need help on functional derivative, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 03:16
- Re: msimsl, Andrea, 03:14
- Re: Is my calculus right?, schoenfeld1, 03:14
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, W. Dale Hall, 03:11
- Re: Affine transformation, Arno, 03:10
- Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, Proginoskes, 03:04
- Re: Simpler example, political issues, The Ghost In The Machine, 03:00
- Re: Help with recursion, robert.w.adams@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:59
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Damir, 02:46
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, fishfry, 02:31
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, Proginoskes, 02:29
- Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, a_plutonium, 02:22
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes, 02:20
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 02:05
- Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, a_plutonium, 02:02
- Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, The Ghost In The Machine, 02:00
- Card pairing probabilities, Phil Freedenberg, 01:55
- Re: the Merging of the Kepler Packing Problem with 4-Color Mapping in 3rd dimension and why higher dimensions are nonexistent, Proginoskes, 01:52
- Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, AntiGag, 01:51
- Re: Trascendental equation, David W . Cantrell, 01:35
- Re: Mathematical Expressions for American Democracy, Robert Israel, 01:17
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, Gib Bogle, 01:10
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, Gib Bogle, 01:08
- Re: JSH: So weak, Gib Bogle, 01:00
- Re: If pi never repeats..., Robert Israel, 00:58
- Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, Chris Osborn, 00:41
- Re: Mean of Multivariate Normal Random Vectors over a Region, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:35
- How to build strong checksums for a large arrays + file?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 00:32
- Re: Help with recursion, smn, 00:07
January 30, 2006
- Re: linear algebra, Igor Khavkine, 23:59
- Mean of Multivariate Normal Random Vectors over a Region, CWJ Lam, 23:59
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Richard Henry, 23:54
- Re: So weak, Richard Henry, 23:51
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Richard Henry, 23:47
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Saint Blurpaedius XXX, 23:24
- Re: Pi contains a secret code !, Ronald Bruck, 23:19
- Re: Need help: Binomial Coefficients Problem, Ronald Bruck, 23:18
- Archimedes Pi Algorithm, dave, 23:12
- Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, a_plutonium, 23:07
- Re: algebra folks, sysman, 23:06
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, William Hughes, 22:53
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Bill Hobba, 22:50
- Re: If pi never repeats..., Dik T. Winter, 22:50
- Help with recursion, robert.w.adams@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:45
- Re: algebra folks, Robart, 22:45
- Need help on functional derivative, lifanjiang, 22:44
- Need help on functional derivative, lifanjiang, 22:44
- Re: Pi contains a secret code !, donstockbauer, 22:42
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, jstevh, 22:22
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Dave Seaman, 22:19
- algebra folks, Rani, 22:14
- Re: algebra help books pls, snowy, 22:07
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Tim Peters, 22:02
- Re: Need help: Binomial Coefficients Problem, Jules, 21:59
- Re: Compactness in Hilbert spaces, Ronald Bruck, 21:55
- Re: JSH: So weak, fishfry, 21:54
- Re: Simpler example, political issues, Michael Varney, 21:52
- Re: Need help: Binomial Coefficients Problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:46
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, jstevh, 21:42
- Re: JSH: So weak, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:40
- JSH: So weak, jstevh, 21:22
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, William Hughes, 21:21
- Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, Bill Dubuque, 21:19
- Re: Pi contains a secret code !, fishfry, 21:15
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, fishfry, 21:14
- Re: Simpler example, political issues, Minus XVII, 21:08
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 21:08
- Need help: Binomial Coefficients Problem, tutorny, 21:03
- Mathematical Expressions for American Democracy, dougwedel, 20:59
- Re: differential equation question, William Elliot, 20:46
- Re: Formal proof of 0<1 for ordered field, Norman Megill, 20:45
- Simpler example, political issues, jstevh, 20:34
- Re: Multiplication of vectors., jeuro2, 20:34
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Bill Hobba, 20:17
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, jstevh, 20:07
- Re: dot product = |a| |b| cos(-) true for any dimensional space?, Chris, 20:00
- Re: Multivariate Newton Rhapson Method, Robert Israel, 20:00
- Re: dot product = |a| |b| cos(-) true for any dimensional space?, W. Dale Hall, 19:59
- Hilbert's Geometry Axioms, Chris, 19:55
- Re: geometry - shapes onto planes, Skippy, 19:55
- Re: Integral inequality, Robert Israel, 19:49
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 19:47
- dot product = |a| |b| cos(-) true for any dimensional space?, True Raptor, 19:34
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Michael Varney, 19:21
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Michael Varney, 19:20
- Re: linear algebra, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 19:06
- Multivariate Newton Rhapson Method, naebad, 18:57
- Re: Composite Congruency Example, Robert Israel, 18:55
- Re: linear algebra, gwlucky, 18:53
- Re: geometry - shapes onto planes, Watson Ladd, 18:51
- linear algebra, bob, 18:49
- Re: Composite Congruency Example, Gerry Myerson, 18:46
- Re: Is e^x zero in some extended number system?, Dave L. Renfro, 18:36
- Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, Gerry Myerson, 18:32
- Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, Christian Bau, 18:31
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Christian Bau, 18:28
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Christian Bau, 18:25
- Re: Compactness in Hilbert spaces, brittanyUK, 18:23
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Damir, 18:16
- Re: the Merging of the Kepler Packing Problem with 4-Color Mapping in 3rd dimension and why higher dimensions are nonexistent, gwlucky, 18:16
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes, 17:52
- Re: the Merging of the Kepler Packing Problem with 4-Color Mapping in 3rd dimension and why higher dimensions are nonexistent, Christian Bau, 17:52
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:52
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Christian Bau, 17:51
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Richard Henry, 17:47
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes, 17:45
- Re: Is e^x zero in some extended number system?, Robert Israel, 17:38
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes, 17:36
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 17:32
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 17:31
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 17:29
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:27
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 17:26
- Integral inequality, Jonas, 17:24
- Re: If pi never repeats..., Robert Israel, 17:15
- Re: Type Of Derivative Where Argument Is Both Variable AND Constant?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 17:06
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 17:03
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, ldb, 17:00
- Help identifing surface, The Perturbator, 16:55
- Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Jannick Asmus, 16:54
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 16:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:16
- Re: Trascendental equation, Chip Eastham, 16:15
- Re: what is a summand, The World Wide Wade, 16:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:08
- Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, Carlos Moreno, 16:02
- Re: what is a summand-, JEMebius, 15:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:50
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Gottfried Helms, 15:42
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, BEM, 15:40
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Damir, 15:39
- geometry - shapes onto planes, Skippy, 15:36
- ***SEX SELLS ***COLLECT YOUR $$$ HERE !!! (( FINANCIAL FREEDOM IS ONLY A CLICK AWAY))), bethhotty, 15:26
- Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, Bart Goddard, 15:25
- Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, gwlucky, 15:23
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Damir, 15:17
- Re: Type Of Derivative Where Argument Is Both Variable AND Constant?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:15
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Eric Gisse, 15:12
- Re: Trascendental equation, Virgil, 15:09
- Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Virgil, 15:06
- Re: Fourier transform of a frequency dependent gaussian function, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:55
- Re: Affine transformation, Randy Poe, 14:54
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 14:50
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:43
- Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, Chip Eastham, 14:36
- Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:34
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:32
- Re: Trascendental equation, Dave L. Renfro, 14:25
- Re: What constitutes mathematical maturity?, gwlucky, 14:20
- Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, gwlucky, 14:16
- Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, AntiGag, 14:12
- Re: What constitutes mathematical maturity?, richard miller, 14:01
- deduce info from reduced matrix, Gary Weselle, 14:00
- Re: Affine transformation, Arno, 13:58
- Power of 2 divisible by 3, XleonardXcobetX, 13:54
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Gib Bogle, 13:49
- Re: Different kinds of homomorphisms, , 13:48
- Re: equivalent norms, David C. Ullrich, 13:46
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 13:45
- Re: what is a summand, Herman Rubin, 13:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 13:25
- Re: What constitutes mathematical maturity?, Herman Rubin, 13:24
- Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, a_plutonium, 13:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 13:18
- Clustering Probabilities, Adam Teasdale Hartshorne, 13:07
- Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, a_plutonium, 13:05
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 12:57
- Re: Trascendental equation, rjfmv, 12:53
- Re: Trascendental equation, rjfmv, 12:52
- Re: Trascendental equation, rjfmv, 12:52
- Re: differential equation question, Robert Israel, 12:52
- Re: Trascendental equation, rjfmv, 12:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 12:50
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 12:49
- Re: Trascendental equation, ldierckens, 12:43
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 12:38
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Daniel Grubb, 12:38
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 12:36
- Re: what is a summand, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:29
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:21
- Re: Failure of reason, Mot Datrix, 12:19
- Re: complex analysis: Mobeious functions, Keith A. Lewis, 12:11
- Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Marc Olschok, 12:05
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 12:04
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, James Dolan, 12:02
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 11:57
- Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Kees, 11:49
- definition of a pretopology, Alexis Gallagher, 11:43
- Re: Ideals of Products, Jannick Asmus, 11:42
- Re: what is a summand, Michael Varney, 11:40
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 11:36
- Re: Trascendental equation, G. A. Edgar, 11:36
- Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, G. A. Edgar, 11:33
- Re: what is a summand, G. A. Edgar, 11:30
- Re: Pi contains a secret code !, Mot Datrix, 11:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 11:25
- Pi contains a secret code !, New Cultural Paradigm, 11:24
- Fourier transform of a frequency dependent gaussian function, csimon, 11:20
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Michael Varney, 11:20
- Re: differential equation question, asdf, 11:17
- Re: Trascendental equation, Michael Varney, 11:16
- Re: what is a summand, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:15
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 11:14
- Re: Is e^x zero in some extended number system?, Dave L. Renfro, 11:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:08
- Re: Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Keith A. Lewis, 11:07
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Randy Poe, 10:57
- Re: Type Of Derivative Where Argument Is Both Variable AND Constant?, Kaimbridge, 10:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:47
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 10:39
- Re: Algorithm to group all subsets [a,b,c,d] in a set of 10 nmbrs[1..10] into the least of number of subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] without repetition of numbers in each sets ?My result is 20 subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] . I need more speed + elegance?, Keith A. Lewis, 10:37
- Re: Is e^x zero in some extended number system?, David W . Cantrell, 10:37
- Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Robert Low, 10:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 10:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 10:33
- Re: Affine transformation, Randy Poe, 10:29
- Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, kj, 10:29
- Is e^x zero in some extended number system?, Dave L. Renfro, 10:21
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Arturo Magidin, 10:19
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Daniel Grubb, 10:17
- Re: Trascendental equation, David W . Cantrell, 10:08
- Re: What is this notation?, David C . Ullrich, 10:04
- Re: equivalent norms, David C . Ullrich, 10:00
- Re: Different kinds of homomorphisms, Arturo Magidin, 09:28
- Re: Is the function y=1/x discontinuous?, Arturo Magidin, 09:23
- Re: what is a summand, G. A. Edgar, 09:17
- Re: Trascendental equation, Chip Eastham, 09:00
- Re: Trascendental equation, Pubkeybreaker, 08:52
- Re: Affine transformation-, JEMebius, 08:42
- Re: Trascendental equation, Me, 08:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 08:40
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, fernando revilla, 08:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 08:35
- Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', Jannick Asmus, 08:32
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, icahit, 08:29
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, David C . Ullrich, 08:27
- Different kinds of homomorphisms, Martin, 08:23
- Re: Show this matrix is not diagonalizable-, JEMebius, 08:20
- Re: what is a summand, G.E. Ivey, 08:18
- Trascendental equation, rjfmv, 08:18
- Re: Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Karel Bruneel, 08:09
- Re: Composite Congruency Example, Steve Schooler, 08:03
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, David Moran, 07:58
- what is a summand, Chris, 07:56
- Re: differential equation question, Patrick Coilland, 07:55
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Harry, 07:42
- Re: differential equation question, William Elliot, 07:28
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, James Dolan, 07:27
- SEX SEACRH-- SINGLE FEMALE PROFILES--100% FREE--NO CREDIT CARD REQUIRED--FREE***FREE**, emtayalways, 07:23
- Re: Is the function y=1/x discontinuous?, Robert Low, 07:19
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, James Dolan, 07:09
- Re: ALL functions are continous!, Toni Lassila, 06:53
- Re: Affine transformation, Toni Lassila, 06:52
- Re: What constitutes mathematical maturity?, matthias, 06:40
- Re: Is the function y=1/x discontinuous?, agentmath, 06:29
- Re: dual of a category, Robin Houston, 06:14
- Re: What constitutes mathematical maturity?, Aatu Koskensilta, 06:10
- Re: Ideals of Products, Jose Capco, 06:08
- Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, BSK, 05:56
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 30, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:42
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Larry Lard, 05:35
- Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, Jyrki Lahtonen, 05:33
- Re: Ideals of Products, Jose Capco, 05:17
- one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, a_plutonium, 05:15
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 05:00
- Re: Composition of convex function, Robert Israel, 04:48
- Re: If pi never repeats..., Robert Israel, 04:25
- Re: differential equation question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 04:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 04:23
- Symmetry Festival, Michel PETITJEAN, 04:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 04:16
- Re: differential equation question, Patrick Coilland, 04:03
- differential equation question, asdf, 03:52
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, MoeBlee, 03:29
- Re: Is the function y=1/x discontinuous?, Robert Low, 03:28
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 03:20
- Re: ALL functions are continous!, Robert Low, 03:15
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 03:11
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Gib Bogle, 03:03
- Composition of convex function, Budge, 02:52
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 02:37
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, José Carlos Santos, 02:35
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes, 02:14
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, a_plutonium, 02:08
- Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, Martin . Sleziak, 01:58
- Re: Is the function y=1/x discontinuous?, Ronald Bruck, 01:54
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, a_plutonium, 01:53
- Re: analysis proof help, William Elliot, 01:52
- Re: ALL functions are continous!, Alex. Lupas, 01:50
- Re: Affine transformation, Arno, 01:46
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 01:46
- Re: a fixed point, Patrick Coilland, 01:44
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes, 01:44
- Re: Failure of reason, odin, 01:38
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes, 01:36
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 01:35
- Re: Derivate OFa number, Alex. Lupas, 01:32
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 01:29
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 01:19
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 01:16
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Proginoskes, 01:08
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, a_plutonium, 00:59
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Gib Bogle, 00:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 00:55
- Call for Papers: IMECS 2006 (international multiconference of 14 engineering & scientific computing conferences), imecs2006, 00:54
- analysis proof help, quat, 00:49
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 00:39
- Re: cartesian vector notation, Neelavalli, 00:15
January 29, 2006
- Re: Failure of reason, odin, 23:58
- Is the function y=1/x discontinuous?, agentmath, 23:45
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Mkajuma, 23:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Chip Eastham, 23:41
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Rick Decker, 23:40
- Re: ALL functions are continous!, Michael Varney, 23:30
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 23:05
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Mkajuma, 22:59
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Ken Quirici, 22:52
- Re: Please help Graph Theory, Chip Eastham, 22:43
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, William Hughes, 22:42
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Dave Seaman, 22:28
- Re: Compactness in Hilbert spaces, brittanyUK, 22:13
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 22:11
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Gib Bogle, 22:05
- Re: ALL functions are continous!, barr, 22:02
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture equivalency, Dik T. Winter, 21:57
- Re: JSH: Failure of reason, fishfry, 21:53
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, Michael Varney, 21:52
- Re: JSH: Failure of reason, Michael Varney, 21:49
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Michael Varney, 21:48
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, W. Dale Hall, 21:44
- Re: Compactness in Hilbert spaces, Ronald Bruck, 21:44
- Re: If pi never repeats..., Dik T. Winter, 21:33
- Re: AP: There is a line..., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:32
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Virgil, 21:24
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Virgil, 21:20
- Re: deduce info from reduced matrix, Robert Israel, 21:18
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, matthias, 21:17
- Re: ALL functions are continous!, Virgil, 21:14
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, matthias, 21:13
- Re: ALL functions are continous!, Robert Israel, 21:11
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, matthias, 21:10
- Derivate OFa number, NILS BÖRJESSON, 21:04
- Re: the Merging of the Kepler Packing Problem with 4-Color Mapping in 3rd dimension and why higher dimensions are nonexistent, Proginoskes, 21:01
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, matthias, 21:00
- Hexpentaquaternions: a two-hand quaternion algebra, Peter M Jack, 20:59
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, matthias, 20:55
- Re: Show this matrix is not diagonalizable, Robert Israel, 20:51
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture equivalency, Fermat, 20:49
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Proginoskes, 20:45
- Re: What constitutes mathematical maturity?, mikeh106@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:45
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 20:41
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, jstevh, 20:35
- JSH: Failure of reason, jstevh, 20:30
- What constitutes mathematical maturity?, Karl M. Bunday, 20:26
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, jstevh, 20:24
- Re: College Algebra texts, Karl M. Bunday, 20:18
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 20:15
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Robart, 20:11
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 20:10
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, jstevh, 20:09
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 20:08
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, jstevh, 20:07
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 20:05
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 20:02
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 20:00
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 19:55
- Re: ALL functions are continous!, Michael Varney, 19:55
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Michael Varney, 19:50
- Compactness in Hilbert spaces, brittanyUK, 19:43
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 19:34
- Re: AP: There is a line..., Proginoskes, 19:34
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Ken Quirici, 19:32
- Re: Proof of the Kepler Packing Problem, using my proof of 4 Color Mapping as guide, Proginoskes, 19:32
- ALL functions are continous!, NILS BÖRJESSON, 19:28
- Re: JSH: The first to tender his resignation from the JSH movement *was myself.*, Proginoskes, 19:27
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes, 19:25
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 19:12
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Gib Bogle, 19:11
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 19:01
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Bill Hobba, 18:59
- Re: List Structure, Ray Koopman, 18:57
- Re: Is my calculus right?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:55
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Minus XVII, 18:53
- Re: Affine transformation, gwlucky, 18:50
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 18:49
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Dave Seaman, 18:45
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Minus XVII, 18:44
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 18:42
- Re: the Merging of the Kepler Packing Problem with 4-Color Mapping in 3rd dimension and why higher dimensions are nonexistent, Minus XVII, 18:35
- Re: Is my calculus right?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:33
- Re: Is my calculus right?, mikeh106@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:31
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 18:28
- Affine transformation, Arno, 18:26
- Re: Is my calculus right?, mikeh106@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:25
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 18:24
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Minus XVII, 18:23
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Watson Ladd, 18:15
- Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 18:04
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Rick Decker, 18:01
- Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Watson Ladd, 18:01
- Re: Is my calculus right?, mikeh106@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:55
- Re: Show this matrix is not diagonalizable, Carl R., 17:47
- Re: Please help Graph Theory, Robert Israel, 17:44
- Re: Is my calculus right?, gwlucky, 17:42
- Re: Show this matrix is not diagonalizable, Robert Israel, 17:38
- Is my calculus right?, Protoman, 17:20
- Re: Is the trefoil knot connected to SU(2)?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 17:11
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, José Carlos Santos, 17:10
- Re: How to verify that..., Robert Israel, 17:09
- Re: Convergence problem, Robert Israel, 17:04
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, José Carlos Santos, 17:02
- Re: order of an element, , 16:59
- Re: Show this matrix is not diagonalizable, Chip Eastham, 16:45
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Gib Bogle, 16:45
- Please help Graph Theory, charleshowardmath, 16:43
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, Chip Eastham, 16:41
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Gib Bogle, 16:40
- Show this matrix is not diagonalizable, Carl R., 16:39
- Re: What is this notation?, Virgil, 16:33
- Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, Timothy Murphy, 16:26
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 16:16
- Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Robert Israel, 16:08
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Tim Peters, 16:04
- Re: a fixed point, Jannick Asmus, 16:04
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, fishfry, 15:54
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Tim Peters, 15:52
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 15:45
- Re: If pi never repeats..., fishfry, 15:43
- Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', David W . Cantrell, 15:42
- Re: order of an element, Chip Eastham, 15:39
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, fishfry, 15:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 15:34
- Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, robin . bruce, 15:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:31
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:21
- Re: What is this notation?, brutuz86, 15:20
- Re: Type Of Derivative Where Argument Is Both Variable AND Constant?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:20
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Arturo Magidin, 15:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:11
- Re: Fourier Series Square Wave, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:09
- Re: a fixed point, Patrick Coilland, 15:00
- Re: algebra help books pls, Ken Pledger, 15:00
- Re: JSH: Better explanation?, The Ghost In The Machine, 15:00
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:52
- Re: Cryptanalysis, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 14:52
- Re: a fixed point, Patrick Coilland, 14:45
- Re: a fixed point, Ronald Bruck, 14:35
- Re: Draped Fishing Net, James Waldby, 14:33
- Re: If pi never repeats---, JEMebius, 14:27
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture equivalency, Jules, 14:12
- Re: the Merging of the Kepler Packing Problem with 4-Color Mapping in 3rd dimension and why higher dimensions are nonexistent, gwlucky, 14:01
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, gwlucky, 13:56
- Re: AP: There is a line..., Ben Rudiak-Gould, 13:56
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Christian Bau, 13:55
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Christian Bau, 13:47
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Christian Bau, 13:43
- Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, sigoldberg1, 13:35
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Robert J. Kolker, 13:34
- Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, David Ames, 13:29
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, jstevh, 13:27
- Re: What do you think of Numb3rs?, Arturo Magidin, 13:27
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 13:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 13:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 13:19
- Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, sigoldberg1, 13:19
- JSH: Better explanation?, jstevh, 13:15
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 13:13
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Tony, 13:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 13:05
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, We Pretty, 13:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 12:58
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, jstevh, 12:58
- Complex Locus, mitch, 12:50
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, jstevh, 12:49
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 12:38
- Re: Fourier Series Square Wave, A N Niel, 12:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 12:26
- Re: order of an element, , 12:20
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, William Hughes, 12:15
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, jstevh, 12:15
- Re: algebra help books pls, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:52
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 11:49
- Re: What is this notation?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:48
- Re: pre-calc review and single variable calculus text, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:44
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Robart, 11:43
- Re: College Algebra texts, gwlucky, 11:42
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 11:41
- Re: College Algebra texts, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:38
- Re: Draped Fishing Net, Narasimham, 11:36
- AP: There is a line..., gwlucky, 11:35
- the Merging of the Kepler Packing Problem with 4-Color Mapping in 3rd dimension and why higher dimensions are nonexistent, a_plutonium, 11:34
- Re: center of a triangle, Rob Johnson, 11:25
- Re: College Algebra texts, Casey Hawthorne, 11:23
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 11:19
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture equivalency, gwlucky, 11:18
- Re: Ordered printout of a Patricia file?, davsf, 11:16
- Re: pre-calc review and single variable calculus text, gwlucky, 11:13
- Re: Fourier Series Square Wave, damage, 11:07
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 11:06
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 11:05
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 11:02
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 10:53
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 10:50
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 10:45
- Re: Formal proof of 0<1 for ordered field, Dan Christensen, 10:44
- Re: What is this notation?, brutuz86, 10:37
- Re: Proof of the Kepler Packing Problem, using my proof of 4 Color Mapping as guide, gwlucky, 10:28
- Re: intuitionistic logic and symmetry, No One, 10:27
- Re: Fourier Series Square Wave, gwlucky, 10:24
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Ken Quirici, 10:18
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Ken Quirici, 10:11
- Re: Type Of Derivative Where Argument Is Both Variable AND Constant?, Kaimbridge, 10:08
- Re: center of a triangle, Elliott Chapin, 10:05
- Re: equivalent norms, eugene, 09:58
- Re: Show that ... (changed directory), zetafunction, 09:49
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, José Carlos Santos, 09:40
- Re: compactness and closed projector, Jannick Asmus, 09:39
- Re: Math as a religion, G.E. Ivey, 09:29
- Re: What do you think of Numb3rs?, Herb Martin, 09:14
- Re: What is this notation?, David C . Ullrich, 08:55
- Re: What is this notation?, Dirk Van de moortel, 08:54
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, David C . Ullrich, 08:51
- Fourier Series Square Wave, damage, 08:42
- Re: compactness and closed projector, Li Yi, 08:32
- Re: pre-calc review and single variable calculus text, Herb Martin, 08:31
- Re: a fixed point, Jannick Asmus, 08:02
- Re: intuitionistic logic and symmetry, Robert J. Kolker, 07:17
- What is this notation?, brutuz86, 07:15
- DON1, please post something., Damir, 07:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila, 07:11
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, José Carlos Santos, 07:00
- Re: bases and system in Hilbert space, David C . Ullrich, 06:51
- Re: JSH: The first to tender his resignation from the JSH movement *was myself.*, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 06:42
- Re: JSH: Math as a religion, David C . Ullrich, 06:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 06:38
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Gottfried Helms, 06:32
- Re: Laplace transformation, gerthectors, 06:28
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, David C . Ullrich, 06:23
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, David C . Ullrich, 06:18
- Re: compactness and closed projector, A N Niel, 05:58
- Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', Robert Israel, 04:36
- Re: algebra help books pls, john_ramsden, 04:33
- Re: a fixed point, Patrick Coilland, 04:29
- Re: A problem regarding convolution, Robert Israel, 04:20
- Re: What do you think of Numb3rs?, john_ramsden, 04:14
- Re: pre-calc review and single variable calculus text, Michael Varney, 04:00
- Re: College Algebra texts, Michael Varney, 03:58
- Re: What do you think of Numb3rs?, Michael Varney, 03:53
- Re: What do you think of Numb3rs?, Michael Varney, 03:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 03:44
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture equivalency, lynto008, 03:44
- Goldbach Conjecture equivalency, lynto008, 03:33
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 03:21
- Re: bases and system in Hilbert space, José Carlos Santos, 03:07
- Proof of the Kepler Packing Problem, using my proof of 4 Color Mapping as guide, a_plutonium, 03:02
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, José Carlos Santos, 03:02
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, José Carlos Santos, 02:52
- Re: College Algebra texts, William Elliot, 02:35
- Re: a fixed point, eugene, 02:34
- Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Robert Israel, 02:27
- pre-calc review and single variable calculus text, Chris Lott, 02:18
- College Algebra texts, Chris Lott, 02:18
- Re: JSH: The first to tender his resignation from the JSH movement *was myself.*, fishfry, 02:17
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes, 02:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Keith Ramsay, 02:08
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:06
- compactness and closed projector, Li Yi, 02:01
- intuitionistic logic and symmetry, No One, 01:54
- dual of a category, No One, 01:52
- Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes, 01:05
- Re: Formal proof of 0<1 for ordered field, MoeBlee, 00:53
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 00:38
- Composite Congruency Example, Steve Schooler, 00:36
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 00:34
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 00:33
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 00:32
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, Proginoskes, 00:23
- JSH: The first to tender his resignation from the JSH movement *was myself.*, Mot Datrix, 00:16
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes, 00:08
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes, 00:06
- Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, Mot Datrix, 00:03
January 28, 2006
- Re: Trajectories Ordinary differntial equations, majamin, 23:58
- Re: What do you think of Numb3rs?, Erik Naggum, 23:55
- Re: List Structure, majamin, 23:48
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Arturo Magidin, 23:42
- Re: picture for Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 23:38
- Re: Type Of Derivative Where Argument Is Both Variable AND Constant?, ticbol, 23:12
- Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 23:12
- bases and system in Hilbert space, hujin, 23:11
- Re: My apologies, Tim Peters, 23:08
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 23:07
- Re: Formal proof of 0<1 for ordered field, Norman Megill, 22:45
- What do you think of Numb3rs?, innominatetwice, 22:32
- Re: If pi never repeats..., Jules, 22:27
- Re: If pi never repeats..., dougwedel, 22:14
- Re: If pi never repeats..., fishfry, 22:04
- Re: If pi never repeats..., abe . buckingham, 22:03
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman, 21:56
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Tim Peters, 21:47
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Minus XVII, 21:41
- Re: Laplace transformation, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:32
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, drocillo, 21:28
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Tim Peters, 21:28
- If pi never repeats..., dougwedel, 21:27
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 21:22
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Minus XVII, 21:18
- Re: equations for a pyramid (2-D and 3-D), bodhi2 . 71828, 21:17
- Re: equations for a pyramid (2-D and 3-D), bodhi2 . 71828, 21:01
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Old Pif, 20:55
- Re: Draped Fishing Net, Mot Datrix, 20:55
- Re: List Structure, Mot Datrix, 20:51
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Wim Benthem, 20:41
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Robart, 20:40
- Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, frank z. meng, 20:28
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Robart, 20:25
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Robart, 20:20
- Re: center of a triangle, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 20:13
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Wim Benthem, 20:07
- List Structure, T-Dog, 19:53
- Re: a fixed point, William Elliot, 19:21
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, jstevh, 19:12
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Bill Hobba, 18:38
- center of a triangle, dharmalion2003, 18:33
- Type Of Derivative Where Argument Is Both Variable AND Constant?, Kaimbridge, 18:30
- Re: Name for congruence relationship ?, dkfjdklj, 18:29
- Re: Multiplication of vectors., john, 18:14
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 18:10
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, José Carlos Santos, 18:05
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, José Carlos Santos, 18:02
- Re: self explanatory algebra books, gwlucky, 17:57
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Robart, 17:49
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 17:43
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Christopher J. Henrich, 17:37
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 17:28
- Trajectories Ordinary differntial equations, ttt, 17:14
- Re: The math used in Dancing with the stars!, Dan, 17:14
- Re: Definition of Tautology, just for Lester, gwlucky, 17:13
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Eric Gisse, 17:05
- Re: Using a derivative and calculating an integral, Michael Varney, 17:04
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:00
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 16:58
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, Michael Varney, 16:57
- Re: Definition of Tautology, just for Lester, Robert J. Kolker, 16:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 16:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 16:36
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, gwlucky, 16:28
- Re: A problem regarding convolution, John L. Barber, 16:20
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 16:17
- Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, gwlucky, 16:16
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Arturo Magidin, 16:16
- Re: Definition of Tautology, just for Lester, gwlucky, 16:14
- Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, fishfry, 16:11
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, fishfry, 16:08
- Re: order of an element, Arturo Magidin, 16:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 16:03
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 16:03
- Re: a fixed point, José Carlos Santos, 15:55
- Re: Reducing Factorials, José Carlos Santos, 15:54
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, José Carlos Santos, 15:48
- Re: Algorithm to group all subsets [a,b,c,d] in a set of 10 nmbrs[1..10] into the least of number of subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] without repetition of numbers in each sets ?My result is 20 subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] . I need more speed + elegance?, James Waldby, 15:46
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, José Carlos Santos, 15:46
- Abstract Algebra books needed, frank z. meng, 15:34
- Re: L^1[0,1] question.., Jannick Asmus, 15:27
- Re: L^1[0,1] question.., The World Wide Wade, 15:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 15:24
- Re: Formal proof of 0<1 for ordered field, Dan Christensen, 15:24
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Old Pif, 15:18
- Re: JSH: Math as a religion, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:59
- L^1[0,1] question.., James, 14:58
- Reducing Factorials, tutorny, 14:57
- Re: Laplace transformation, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 14:53
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Tim Peters, 14:36
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Robart, 14:36
- GROWTH/DECAY RIDDLE., jeuro2, 14:24
- Draped Fishing Net, Narasimham, 14:13
- Re: JSH: My apologies, Victor Eijkhout, 14:03
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 13:53
- Re: Show that resolvent operator L ..., zetafunction, 13:52
- Where is the polytop and polyhedral cone here?, Konrad Viltersten, 13:49
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, William Hughes, 13:45
- a fixed point, eugene, 13:44
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 13:37
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:33
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 13:24
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:06
- Re: JSH: Trivially easy math, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: JSH: More math, let's see, José Carlos Santos, 12:59
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:55
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 12:45
- Re: Limit of a sequence, Rob Johnson, 12:42
- The math used in Dancing with the stars!, Dan, 12:37
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 12:36
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, jstevh, 12:36
- JSH: More math, let's see, jstevh, 12:32
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, José Carlos Santos, 12:32
- Definition of Tautology, just for Lester, Robert J. Kolker, 12:16
- Re: Basic Representation Theory question,, José Carlos Santos, 12:16
- Re: Saying you're reasonable, David C . Ullrich, 12:11
- Re: JSH: Math as a religion, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:05
- Re: Saying you're reasonable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:54
- Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:45
- Re: Saying you're reasonable, jstevh, 11:36
- Re: Basic Representation Theory question,, Jannick Asmus, 11:26
- Re: Basic Representation Theory question,, Jannick Asmus, 11:24
- Re: Saying you're reasonable, David Moran, 11:22
- Re: Binomial distribution question, Dave Seaman, 11:21
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:18
- JSH: Saying you're reasonable, jstevh, 11:14
- Is the trefoil knot connected to SU(2)?, frank_k_sheldon, 11:07
- Re: cartesian vector notation, deniz . bahar, 10:59
- Re: JSH: Math as a religion, jstevh, 10:58
- Re: Name for congruence relationship ?, M.J.T. Guy, 10:54
- (Alpha-Beta) Triangle, bassam king karzeddin, 10:36
- Re: equivalent norms, David C . Ullrich, 09:55
- Re: Existence of pdf and mgf, Olw, 09:24
- Re: JSH: My apologies, David C . Ullrich, 09:17
- Re: Limit of a sequence, David C . Ullrich, 08:57
- Basic Representation Theory question,, James, 08:55
- Re: A problem regarding convolution, John L. Barber, 08:49
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, David C . Ullrich, 08:45
- Re: Convergence problem, A N Niel, 08:44
- Re: Using a derivative and calculating an integral, A N Niel, 08:40
- Re: Series sum, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 08:30
- Re: order of an element, alihandam@xxxxxxxxx, 08:21
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Timothy Murphy, 08:18
- How to verify that..., zetafunction, 08:13
- Convergence problem, ManOfLight, 08:01
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Alexander, 08:01
- Re: A correct and complete statement of Zeno's runner paradox, Alexander, 07:57
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes - What is wrong?, Alexander, 07:50
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes - What is wrong?, Alexander, 07:48
- equivalent norms, eugene, 07:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 07:18
- Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, robin . bruce, 07:17
- Re: Formal proof of 0<1 for ordered field, Jan Burse, 07:16
- Re: complex integral, Rob Johnson, 06:20
- Laplace transformation, gerthectors, 06:15
- Re: Using a derivative and calculating an integral, Protoman2050, 05:11
- Emit detect Dirac ambient h*fL., brian a m stuckless, 05:09
- Re: Einstein's Gravity is Emergent, brian a m stuckless, 05:09
- Re: Using a derivative and calculating an integral, A N Niel, 05:09
- Re: Communication breakdown, Tim Peters, 04:56
- Re: Series sum, ppuedom, 04:50
- Name for congruence relationship ?, dkfjdklj, 04:43
- Re: Series sum, ppuedom, 04:19
- Re: Series sum, ppuedom, 04:16
- Re: cartesian vector notation, Clifford J. Nelson, 04:02
- Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', john_ramsden, 03:53
- Re: JSH: Math as a religion, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:53
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Christian Bau, 03:45
- Re: Representations of infinite groups, Jannick Asmus, 03:37
- Re: A Basic Theorem, john_ramsden, 03:35
- Re: Algorithm to group all subsets [a,b,c,d] in a set of 10 nmbrs[1..10] into the least of number of subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] without repetition of numbers in each sets ?My result is 20 subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] . I need more speed + elegance?, James Waldby, 03:34
- Using a derivative and calculating an integral, Protoman2050, 03:08
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium, 02:51
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, José Carlos Santos, 02:42
- Re: complex analysis: Mobeious functions, José Carlos Santos, 02:34
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium, 02:32
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 02:24
- Re: Polish space, eugene, 02:17
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium, 02:15
- Re: Ordered printout of a Patricia file?, davsf, 01:42
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes, 01:32
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes, 01:14
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, Proginoskes, 01:12
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes, 01:10
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes, 01:04
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman, 01:04
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman, 01:04
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman, 01:04
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes, 01:00
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes, 00:54
- Re: JSH: Trivially easy math, William Hughes, 00:30
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, Proginoskes, 00:27
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, Proginoskes, 00:08
- Re: algebra help books pls, fishfry, 00:03
- Re: self explanatory algebra books, fishfry, 00:02
January 27, 2006
- Re: complex integral, tanabai, 23:50
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium, 23:49
- Re: Formal proof of 0<1 for ordered field, Dan Christensen, 23:33
- Re: Algorithm to group all subsets [a,b,c,d] in a set of 10 nmbrs[1..10] into the least of number of subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] without repetition of numbers in each sets ?My result is 20 subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] . I need more speed + elegance?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 23:30
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 23:19
- Re: Binomial distribution question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 23:16
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 23:12
- Re: 1+2+3+....., jhding@xxxxxxx, 23:10
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 23:08
- JSH: My apologies, jstevh, 23:05
- Re: Communication breakdown, KeithK, 23:03
- Re: Binomial distribution question, carlos . james . r, 22:46
- Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, Peter Webb, 22:44
- Re: Minimimum of N discrete RV, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:41
- Re: dynamic programming on a tree, Someonekicked, 22:35
- Re: cartesian vector notation, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:32
- complex analysis: Mobeious functions, HY, 22:24
- Ordered printout of a Patricia file?, davsf, 22:23
- Re: algebra help books pls, snowy, 22:18
- JSH: Trivially easy math, jstevh, 22:01
- Re: self explanatory algebra books pls, jothi16, 21:56
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, William Hughes, 21:53
- Re: Series sum, Rob Johnson, 21:39
- Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, Ronald Bruck, 21:35
- dynamic programming on a tree, tenida@xxxxxxxxx, 21:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:24
- Re: delta function, tenida@xxxxxxxxx, 21:20
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 21:16
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 21:12
- self explanatory algebra books, stony, 21:08
- Re: JSH: Math as a religion, jstevh, 21:02
- Minimimum of N discrete RV, Intiha, 20:57
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, William Hughes, 20:48
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, Tim Peters, 20:43
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 20:28
- Representations of infinite groups, lisimba, 20:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 20:15
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Old Pif, 20:08
- Re: A Basic Theorem, Peter Allen, 19:40
- Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Jannick Asmus, 19:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:32
- Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', Peter Allen, 19:29
- Re: Help Integrating this expression, bg, 19:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:21
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 19:15
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:06
- Re: order of an element, Arturo Magidin, 19:06
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:51
- Re: Help Integrating this expression, Ray Koopman, 18:48
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, José Carlos Santos, 18:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 18:38
- Re: Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Keith A. Lewis, 18:37
- Re: A problem regarding convolution, Robert Israel, 18:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:35
- Re: Polish space, Ulysse Keller, 18:34
- Re: order of an element, Ulysse Keller, 18:34
- Re: Series sum, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 18:09
- Help Integrating this expression, bg, 18:06
- Re: Algorithm to group all subsets [a,b,c,d] in a set of 10 nmbrs[1..10] into the least of number of subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] without repetition of numbers in each sets ?My result is 20 subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] . I need more speed + elegance?, Keith A. Lewis, 17:58
- Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, i . love . jeevitha, 17:37
- Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, Nathan, 17:35
- Re: Formal proof of 0<1 for ordered field, Jan Burse, 17:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 17:18
- Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, i . love . jeevitha, 17:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 17:00
- Polish space, eugene, 16:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:11
- order of an element, alihandam@xxxxxxxxx, 16:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:00
- Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', David W . Cantrell, 15:56
- Re: Series sum, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 15:56
- Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, Dan, 15:50
- Series sum, ppuedom, 15:49
- Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, Nathan, 15:47
- Formal proof of 0<1 for ordered field, Dan Christensen, 15:44
- Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', A N Niel, 15:42
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:35
- Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, Dan Christensen, 15:34
- Re: If you're smart, know plenty, help us with this problem? give us the solution?, Mot Datrix, 15:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:20
- 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', Luke Wu, 15:19
- Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, i . love . jeevitha, 15:15
- Re: A problem regarding convolution, John L. Barber, 15:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 15:11
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:09
- Re: Existence of pdf and mgf, Robert Israel, 15:03
- Re: Multiplication of vectors., jeuro2, 15:03
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, W. Dale Hall, 15:02
- If you're smart, know plenty, help us with this problem? give us the solution?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 15:02
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:57
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 14:56
- Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, Michael Orion, 14:51
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:49
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:48
- Re: A Basic Theorem, Virgil, 14:47
- Re: Multiplication of vectors., Randy Poe, 14:46
- Re: The numbers don't lie, Tim Peters, 14:36
- Re: commutative subgroup of S_n, Fedor, 14:35
- Re: open questions in linear algebra, lataianu bogdan, 14:29
- Re: Multiplication of vectors., jeuro2, 14:24
- Re: A problem regarding convolution, Robert Israel, 14:22
- Re: Limit of a sequence, The World Wide Wade, 14:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:14
- Re: Multiplication of vectors., Randy Poe, 14:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:08
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro, 14:07
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, ldb, 14:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 14:01
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:53
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 13:49
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 13:45
- Re: Solving, gthomas, 13:37
- Multiplication of vectors., jeuro2, 13:35
- Re: Einstein's Gravity is Emergent, brian a m stuckless, 13:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:33
- Re: JSH: Math as a religion, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:23
- Re: JSH: Math as a religion, abe . buckingham, 13:18
- Re: one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, abe . buckingham, 13:09
- Re: Solving, gthomas, 13:06
- one paragraph proof of 4-Color-Mapping, a_plutonium, 13:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:53
- Re: A question on locally compactness, The World Wide Wade, 12:46
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro, 12:45
- Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, Boris Uion, 12:43
- Re: A question on locally compactness, Daniel Grubb, 12:39
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, Arturo Magidin, 12:37
- Buckling column system, Jonie, 12:36
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, Randy Poe, 12:36
- Re: msimsl, Dave Seaman, 12:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:19
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, Wayne Brown, 12:17
- Re: JSH: Math as a religion, Larry Lard, 12:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:05
- Re: groups, automorphisms and isomorphisms, Robert Israel, 12:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:56
- Re: Binomial distribution question, Randy Poe, 11:44
- Re: 1+2+3+....., David R Tribble, 11:43
- Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Robert Israel, 11:42
- Re: A problem regarding convolution, John L. Barber, 11:34
- Re: Limit of a sequence, Mate, 11:25
- Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Ronald Bruck, 11:25
- A question on locally compactness, eugene, 11:23
- Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, Ronald Bruck, 11:20
- Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, Ronald Bruck, 11:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 11:13
- Re: Communication breakdown, Wayne Brown, 11:12
- Re: Binomial distribution question, carlos . james . r, 11:11
- msimsl, Andrea, 11:09
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 11:06
- Re: Math as a religion, Boris Uon, 11:01
- Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Jannick Asmus, 10:54
- Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Jannick Asmus, 10:46
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 10:45
- Existence of pdf and mgf, Olw, 10:43
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Christopher J. Henrich, 10:36
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:35
- Re: A Basic Theorem, David R Tribble, 10:23
- JSH: Math as a religion, jstevh, 10:14
- Re: A Basic Theorem, Randy Poe, 10:09
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 10:04
- Re: A Basic Theorem, G. A. Edgar, 09:53
- Re: A Basic Theorem, Arturo Magidin, 09:36
- Re: What is the maximum area rectangle that can be inscribed inside an equilateral triangle?, Josh, 09:36
- Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, Boris Uon, 09:27
- Re: A Basic Theorem, gerben47, 09:25
- Re: Limit of a sequence, David C . Ullrich, 08:44
- Pi to 10 trillion places, robin . bruce, 08:24
- Re: Solving, Bart Goddard, 08:21
- Re: cardinal number proof, David C . Ullrich, 08:19
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, David C . Ullrich, 08:18
- Re: A problem regarding convolution, David C . Ullrich, 08:14
- Re: Drawing Tool for Spherical Geometry?, chasjac, 08:02
- A Basic Theorem, TheNakedOne, 07:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:44
- Re: how to resolve vector into x-component., john, 07:24
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 07:11
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, William Hughes, 07:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 07:07
- Re: 1+2+3+....., Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:33
- Re: Einstein's Gravity is Emergent, brian a m stuckless, 06:31
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Dik T. Winter, 06:28
- Limit of a sequence, Mate, 06:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:15
- Re: Now the short proof, yet again, José Carlos Santos, 06:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:59
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, José Carlos Santos, 05:42
- Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Karel Bruneel, 05:38
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, Larry Lard, 05:33
- Re: The numbers don't lie, Larry Lard, 05:29
- Re: ? svd for operator, Robert Israel, 05:12
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 04:31
- Integrate the area of the functions between two,orthogonal vectors., LP, 04:21
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium, 04:17
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, W. Dale Hall, 04:14
- Re: commutative subgroup of S_n, Jyrki Lahtonen, 04:06
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:53
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium, 03:52
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:35
- Re: The numbers don't lie, Jyrki Lahtonen, 03:30
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium, 03:29
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:25
- Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, Rob Johnson, 03:23
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium, 03:19
- Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, Proginoskes, 03:18
- Re: entropy: error in wikipedia and planetmath, diegotorquemada, 03:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 03:13
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, Proginoskes, 03:08
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Proginoskes, 03:02
- Implementation of Levenberg-Marquardt method in MATLAB, Dima Stopel, 02:51
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes, 02:46
- Re: Binomial distribution question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 02:40
- Re: Expected value, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:38
- Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 02:36
- Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be and then how do it?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 02:32
- Re: ? svd for operator, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 02:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 02:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 01:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 01:39
- Re: Expected value, PARASHAR, 01:22
- Re: JSH: Same old crap, Felix Rawlings, 01:06
- Re: ? svd for operator, Cheng Cosine, 00:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:49
- Einstein's Gravity is Emergent, Jack Sarfatti, 00:33
- Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, earthnut@xxxxxx, 00:33
- how to resolve vector into x-component., jeuro2, 00:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:21
- Computing Chi-square stats on Card deck, Bill Taylor, 00:01
January 26, 2006
- Algorithm to group all subsets [a,b,c,d] from a set of 10 nmbrs[1..10] into LEAST number of subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f]]- need more speed + elegance?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 23:59
- Algorithm to group all subsets [a,b,c,d] in a set of 10 nmbrs[1..10] into the least of number of subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] without repetition of numbers in each sets ?My result is 20 subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] . I need more speed + elegan, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 23:53
- Algorithm to group all subsets [a,b,c,d] in a set of 10 nmbrs[1..10] into the least of number of subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] without repetition of numbers in each sets ?My result is 20 subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] . I need more speed + elegan, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 23:49
- Algorithm to group all subsets [a,b,c,d] in a set of 10 nmbrs[1..10] into the least of number of subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] without repetition of numbers in each sets ?My result is 20 subsets[a,b,c,d,e,f] . I need more speed + elegance?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 23:43
- What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, Bill Taylor, 23:40
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, John Roberts-Jones, 23:37
- Re: cardinal number proof, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 23:18
- prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, i . love . jeevitha, 23:07
- Re: The numbers don't lie, Rick Decker, 22:56
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Tim Peters, 22:55
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium, 22:49
- Re: The numbers don't lie, Rick Decker, 22:42
- Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Ronald Bruck, 22:38
- Re: The numbers don't lie, Rick Decker, 22:37
- cardinal number proof, Li Yi, 22:35
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 22:29
- Re: 1+2+3+....., abe . buckingham, 22:28
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium, 22:27
- Re: powers of a matrix, Eric, 22:11
- powers of a matrix, Eric, 21:56
- The Silver String, thomasjack, 21:51
- Re: a question about book, nonono, 21:50
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 21:46
- JSH: Same old crap, jstevh, 21:37
- Re: a question about book, Rupert, 21:33
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rupert, 21:30
- Re: The numbers don't lie, jstevh, 21:28
- Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, nonono, 21:28
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, William Hughes, 21:28
- Re: Binomial distribution question, carlos . james . r, 21:18
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 21:18
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 21:16
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, William Hughes, 21:16
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 21:15
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 21:12
- a question about book, nonono, 21:11
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 20:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 20:55
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, William Hughes, 20:50
- Re: 1+2+3+....., Zdislav V. Kovarik, 20:48
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 20:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 20:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 20:36
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rupert, 20:34
- Re: Solving, Virgil, 20:25
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 20:17
- Re: Solving, gthomas, 19:38
- Re: ? svd for operator, Robert Israel, 19:27
- Re: Solving, northstar, 19:26
- Re: How to prove such an inequality?, Ronald Bruck, 19:25
- Re: A problem regarding convolution, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:22
- Re: Solving, gwlucky, 19:22
- Re: Solving, northstar, 19:07
- Re: convexity criteria for ODE solutions, Robert Israel, 19:06
- Re: Solving, northstar, 19:06
- Re: Solving, northstar, 18:57
- Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Robert Israel, 18:57
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Tim Peters, 18:56
- Singular homology question.., James, 18:55
- Re: commutative subgroup of S_n, Fedor, 18:50
- Re: Communication breakdown, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:49
- Re: Solving, gthomas, 18:49
- ? svd for operator, Cheng Cosine, 18:39
- Re: JSH: Communication breakdown, Rupert, 18:30
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rupert, 18:27
- Re: Communication breakdown, Tim Peters, 18:19
- Re: Communication breakdown, Richard Henry, 18:17
- Re: Communication breakdown, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:14
- Re: derivative of arctan(tan(x)), Zdislav V. Kovarik, 18:12
- Re: Ideals of Products, Jannick Asmus, 18:09
- Re: convexity criteria for ODE solutions, maciej . swat, 17:38
- Re: Solving, gwlucky, 17:37
- Re: Communication breakdown, Proginoskes, 17:30
- Re: JSH: Facts don't lie, Wayne Brown, 17:23
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes, 17:18
- Re: the historical misconception of the 4-Color Mapping Problem, Proginoskes, 17:15
- A problem regarding convolution, John L. Barber, 17:15
- Re: Ideals of Products, barr, 17:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 17:09
- Re: What is the maximum area rectangle that can be inscribed inside an equilateral triangle?, Ken Pledger, 17:08
- Re: Solving, jclause, 17:06
- Re: Communication breakdown, Wayne Brown, 17:03
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 16:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:48
- Re: entropy: error in wikipedia and planetmath, Robert Israel, 16:37
- Re: complex root at extremum, Robert Israel, 16:29
- Re: groups, automorphisms and isomorphisms, conchitagutierres, 16:27
- Re: Solving, Virgil, 16:20
- Re: Probability and Group Theory, cbrown, 16:17
- Re: 1+2+3+....., gwlucky, 16:17
- What is the maximum area rectangle that can be inscribed inside an equilateral triangle?, Josh, 16:03
- Re: Binomial distribution question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:57
- Re: commutative subgroup of S_n, , 15:57
- Re: commutative subgroup of S_n, Fedor, 15:56
- Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Jannick Asmus, 15:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:35
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Wayne Brown, 15:33
- entropy: error in wikipedia and planetmath, diegotorquemada, 15:17
- Re: Solving, northstar, 15:10
- Re: Cryptanalysis, Ken Pledger, 15:04
- Re: Binomial distribution question, carlos . james . r, 15:00
- Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, Dan, 14:57
- Re: commutative subgroup of S_n, Robert Israel, 14:56
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 14:48
- Re: Solving, Bart Goddard, 14:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:46
- Re: Drawing Tool for Spherical Geometry?, Narasimham, 14:41
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 14:40
- Re: convexity criteria for ODE solutions, Robert Israel, 14:35
- Re: 1+2+3+....., Narcoleptic Insomniac, 14:34
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:32
- Drawing Tool for Spherical Geometry?, W. Watson, 14:29
- Re: General Nonsense, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:27
- Re: Solving, gwlucky, 14:26
- Re: Binomial distribution question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:25
- Re: 1+2+3+....., gwlucky, 14:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 14:22
- Solving, northstar, 14:21
- Re: 1+2+3+....., Robert Israel, 14:15
- Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, Dan, 14:11
- Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, stern, 14:11
- Re: General Nonsense, martin cohen, 14:08
- Re: summations series references, martin cohen, 14:06
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:05
- Binomial distribution question, carlos . james . r, 14:01
- Re: complex root at extremum, Narasimham, 14:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:57
- Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, Robert Israel, 13:54
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:50
- Re: General Nonsense, Robert Israel, 13:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 13:45
- Re: 1+2+3+....., HallsofIvy, 13:32
- Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, stern, 13:28
- Re: 1+2+3+....., Rob Johnson, 13:26
- Re: The numbers don't lie, Rick Decker, 13:24
- Re: General Nonsense, Marc Olschok, 13:23
- Re: The numbers don't lie, HallsofIvy, 13:21
- Re: 1+2+3+....., gwlucky, 13:16
- Re: 1+2+3+....., Rob Johnson, 13:15
- Re: How to prove such an inequality?, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 13:15
- Re: 1+2+3+....., G. A. Edgar, 13:09
- Re: 1+2+3+....., Rob Johnson, 13:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:04
- Re: How to prove such an inequality?, jing . hu, 13:04
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Arturo Magidin, 13:03
- Re: Probability and Group Theory, Virgil, 13:01
- Re: Abstract fields - clarification, A N Niel, 13:00
- Re: complex root at extremum, Narasimham, 12:59
- Re: General Nonsense, Christopher J. Henrich, 12:56
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:56
- commutative subgroup of S_n, Fedor, 12:54
- Re: Applied mathmatics - straight line eq's + points, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 12:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 12:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 12:51
- Re: counting measure, Fedor, 12:48
- Re: Probability and Group Theory, ArtflDodgr, 12:46
- Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, Robert Israel, 12:38
- Ranked Probability Skill Score problem, KingKong, 12:29
- Re: How to prove such an inequality?, jing . hu, 12:29
- Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, stern, 12:17
- Re: Abstract fields - clarification, aucun, 12:16
- counting measure, hagada, 12:15
- Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, aucun, 12:09
- Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, aucun, 12:02
- Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, Pubkeybreaker, 12:01
- Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, aucun, 12:00
- Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, aucun, 11:29
- Re: a prime number question, aucun, 11:12
- Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, Dan, 11:11
- Re: How to prove such an inequality?, Grothendieck, 11:02
- Re: General Nonsense, Jules, 11:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:50
- Re: 1+2+3+....., David W . Cantrell, 10:50
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:46
- Re: Ideals of Products, Jannick Asmus, 10:45
- report forduty, Grothendieck, 10:43
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:42
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, José Carlos Santos, 10:33
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:29
- Re: Probability and Group Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:28
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rick Decker, 10:21
- Re: 1+2+3+....., abe . buckingham, 10:20
- Re: Chain-Complete Posets, bbmcmung, 10:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:14
- Re: Cryptanalysis, Pubkeybreaker, 10:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:09
- Re: 1+2+3+....., Pubkeybreaker, 10:07
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:00
- Re: 1+2+3+....., gwlucky, 09:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:56
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:52
- Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, ldb, 09:43
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:33
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:18
- Re: Abstract fields - clarification, Hagen, 08:56
- Ideals of Products, Jose Capco, 08:47
- convexity criteria for ODE solutions, maciej . swat, 08:44
- Re: 1+2+3+....., rrahulprasad, 08:31
- Abstract fields - clarification, Guy Corrigall, 08:24
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, William Elliot, 08:18
- 1+2+3+....., mina_world, 08:16
- Algebraic number theory, rodolphe . lampe, 08:04
- Re: Transformation Matrix, Skib, 07:59
- Re: summations series references, A N Niel, 07:56
- Re: OT: News about Lynn Killingbeck., jmfbahciv, 07:54
- Re: General Nonsense, A N Niel, 07:51
- Re: whether the space is complete, David C . Ullrich, 07:51
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Dave Seaman, 07:47
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, David C . Ullrich, 07:32
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 06:51
- Re: Cryptanalysis, Phil Carmody, 06:38
- Re: General Nonsense, Phil Carmody, 06:37
- Re: OT: News about Lynn Killingbeck., Phil Carmody, 06:34
- Re: General Nonsense, Herman Jurjus, 06:28
- one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium, 06:27
- Re: order of an element, Fedor, 06:22
- Re: the historical misconception of the 4-Color Mapping Problem, a_plutonium, 06:06
- Probability and Group Theory, Han de Bruijn, 05:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:09
- Re: Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Karel Bruneel, 04:59
- Re: How to prove such an inequality?, Alois Steindl, 04:41
- Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, Falwe R, 04:33
- Re: the historical misconception of the 4-Color Mapping Problem, Proginoskes, 04:14
- Re: How to prove such an inequality?, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 04:07
- Coins on a Lazy Susan, enigma, 03:55
- Re: the historical misconception of the 4-Color Mapping Problem, Proginoskes, 03:46
- Re: the historical misconception of the 4-Color Mapping Problem, a_plutonium, 03:39
- Re: Cryptanalysis, Falwe R, 03:32
- Re: Cryptanalysis, stern, 03:13
- Re: Cryptanalysis, stern, 03:13
- Re: the historical misconception of the 4-Color Mapping Problem, a_plutonium, 03:11
- Re: General Nonsense, Robert Low, 02:57
- Re: picture for Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 02:10
- Re: picture for Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Narasimham, 02:06
- Re: the historical misconception of the 4-Color Mapping Problem, Proginoskes, 02:01
- Re: picture for Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 01:55
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, William Elliot, 01:52
- Re: set functions, William Elliot, 01:48
- How to prove such an inequality?, jing . hu, 01:43
- picture for Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 01:42
- Re: General Nonsense, john_ramsden, 01:41
- Re: General Nonsense, fishfry, 01:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 01:35
- General Nonsense, Jules, 01:24
- order of an element, alihandam@xxxxxxxxx, 00:58
- Re: the historical misconception of the 4-Color Mapping Problem, a_plutonium, 00:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 00:52
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Chip Eastham, 00:28
- Re: OT: News about Lynn Killingbeck., Robert Israel, 00:26
- Re: groups, automorphisms and isomorphisms, Robert Israel, 00:14
January 25, 2006
- Re: OT: News about Lynn Killingbeck., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 23:46
- Re: reflection preserves surface area, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 23:42
- summations series references, ramakrishnan . kannan, 23:31
- Re: set functions, Ronald Bruck, 23:10
- Perception and Simulation of Intelligent Bahaviour Research Group, yansh, 22:49
- set functions, quat, 22:47
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Dave Rusin, 22:44
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its, James Waldby, 22:28
- OT: News about Lynn Killingbeck., billyv1988@xxxxxxxxx, 22:26
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Dik T. Winter, 22:18
- Re: reflection preserves surface area, The World Wide Wade, 22:04
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 21:43
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Eric Gisse, 21:29
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Eric Gisse, 21:28
- reflection preserves surface area, Sean McIlroy, 21:27
- Re: a prime number question, Bill Dubuque, 21:19
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Proginoskes, 20:51
- Re: Integral inequality from Kantorovich's Theorem, Eric Thurschwell, 20:24
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Tim Peters, 19:48
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:34
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Tim Peters, 19:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:24
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Tim Peters, 19:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:19
- Re: derivative of arctan(tan(x)), sd1, 19:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:16
- Re: derivative of arctan(tan(x)), sd1, 19:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:10
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Tim Peters, 19:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 19:00
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 18:49
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 18:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 18:40
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 18:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 18:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 18:34
- Re: An infinite number question, Phil Carmody, 18:27
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Dave Seaman, 18:22
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 18:10
- Re: the historical misconception of the 4-Color Mapping Problem, Proginoskes, 18:07
- groups, automorphisms and isomorphisms, conchitagutierres, 17:52
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:48
- Re: help: How do I find the exact postion of a cell when converted from 3D to 1 D?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx, 17:41
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Proginoskes, 17:38
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:37
- Re: the historical misconception of the 4-Color Mapping Problem, Proginoskes, 17:36
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul, 17:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:25
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Proginoskes, 17:22
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:22
- Re: fourier series, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:19
- Re: Multidimensional Modular Arithmetic, Virgil, 17:15
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker, 17:03
- Re: An infinite number question, Robert Israel, 17:00
- Re: complex root at extremum, Robert Israel, 16:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:56
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 16:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:43
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:42
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rick Decker, 16:41
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:35
- Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, Robert Israel, 16:28
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, Robert Israel, 16:13
- Re: whether the space is complete, The World Wide Wade, 16:05
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, Robert Israel, 16:00
- Chain-Complete Posets, bbmcmung, 15:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 15:42
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 15:37
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Arturo Magidin, 15:35
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 15:32
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 15:26
- Lecture 10: Contra Loop Quantum Gravity from a String Theorist, Jack Sarfatti, 15:24
- Re: Coupled PDEs, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:23
- Re: Coupled PDEs, kunaldcet, 15:22
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 15:17
- Re: probability question, briggs, 15:14
- Re: Coefficient as measurement for linearity of a stock chart, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:13
- Re: Coupled PDEs, kunaldcet, 15:12
- Re: Does this series converge?, The World Wide Wade, 15:08
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Dave Rusin, 15:06
- Re: Cryptanalysis, Ken Pledger, 15:05
- Re: Prove something on The determinant of Matrix, Ken Pledger, 15:01
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its, Keith A. Lewis, 14:59
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin, 14:53
- Re: system of linear algebraic equation solvability, Jannick Asmus, 14:50
- Re: Coupled PDEs, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:46
- Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, rev.goetz, 14:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:44
- Re: Coefficient as measurement for linearity of a stock chart, Jasen Betts, 14:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:36
- Re: open questions in linear algebra, Michael, 14:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 14:29
- Re: An infinite number question, rev.goetz, 14:14
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Pubkeybreaker, 14:11
- Re: Exotic examples please / re: local extremes, James Waldby, 14:10
- Re: An infinite number question, rev.goetz, 14:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 14:02
- Re: complex root at extremum, Narasimham, 14:01
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin, 13:50
- the historical misconception of the 4-Color Mapping Problem, a_plutonium, 13:45
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 13:45
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:42
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Michael Varney, 13:42
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:40
- Re: Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 13:34
- Re: Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, gwlucky, 13:33
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 13:31
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 13:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:26
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, James Waldby, 13:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:22
- Re: Triangle # prime sieve revisited:Making claim to another discovery!, Dan, 13:20
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, W. Dale Hall, 13:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 13:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 13:08
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 13:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 12:59
- Re: Question about partial order, agapito6314, 12:37
- Re: Draft Order, Duncan Muirhead, 12:34
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 12:32
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, abe . buckingham, 12:29
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Arturo Magidin, 12:23
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, nir cohen, 12:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:08
- Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Karel Bruneel, 12:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:02
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:58
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 11:46
- Re: advice for transfering grad student, gwlucky, 11:44
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, nir cohen, 11:39
- Re: probability question, The Qurqirish Dragon, 11:37
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Chip Eastham, 11:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 11:20
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker, 11:17
- Re: Help with proving the directional derivative, jpawloski, 11:03
- Re: Help with proving the directional derivative, Robert Low, 10:58
- Help with proving the directional derivative, jpawloski, 10:50
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Rick Decker, 10:40
- Re: 2D equi distant points around circle onto around 3D sphere, guitar . is . good, 10:38
- Re: Coupled PDEs, nir cohen, 10:34
- system of linear algebraic equation solvability, Sergiy M.Zhuk, 10:32
- Re: Kripke's inductive partial self-applicable truth predicate, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:26
- Kripke's inductive partial self-applicable truth predicate, Aatu Koskensilta, 10:25
- Re: 2D equi distant points around circle onto around 3D sphere, Sylvain Croussette, 10:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 10:10
- Re: An observation and question about orthogonality, jw12jw12jw12, 10:04
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 10:04
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 09:56
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin, 09:31
- Re: advice for transfering grad student, G. A. Edgar, 09:16
- Re: Question about partial order, A N Niel, 09:14
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, abe . buckingham, 09:12
- Re: probability question, Rod, 09:03
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 08:53
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Harry, 08:51
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Justin, 08:42
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Robert J. Kolker, 08:41
- Re: Does this series converge?, Rob Johnson, 08:31
- Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, Dan Christensen, 08:26
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 08:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 08:25
- Parabolic subgroups, Grothendieck-Hirzebruch, 08:13
- GAY BOY SMITH, Sexshelly, 08:10
- Re: Gaussian Probablity function, iandjmsmith, 08:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, briggs, 08:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David Hartley, 08:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:42
- Approximating an expectation term, Vicki, 07:42
- Re: a prime number question, Rob Johnson, 07:41
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Robert J. Kolker, 07:36
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Robert J. Kolker, 07:34
- Re: whether the space is complete, eugene, 07:31
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Dave Seaman, 07:23
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 07:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:12
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, William Elliot, 06:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:07
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 05:57
- Re: Coefficient as measurement for linearity of a stock chart, Rod, 05:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:32
- Coefficient as measurement for linearity of a stock chart, Jan Vervekken, 05:27
- Re: open questions in linear algebra, Hagen, 05:17
- local homeomorphism, Simeon Stefanov, 04:59
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Robert J. Kolker, 04:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:43
- Re: Does this series converge?, Ronald Bruck, 04:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:06
- Does this series converge?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 04:05
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Michael, 03:53
- Cryptanalysis, Falwe R, 03:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:50
- Multidimensional Modular Arithmetic, tontoko, 03:49
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Keith Ramsay, 03:40
- Coins on a Lazy Susan, stern, 03:26
- Re: a prime number question, Fermat, 03:26
- Re: A perfect number question regarding the Colatz conjecture!, Fermat, 03:22
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Proginoskes, 03:01
- Re: What will happen, José Carlos Santos, 02:44
- Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, José Carlos Santos, 02:28
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 02:22
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 02:18
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 01:50
- Re: negative notation, William Elliot, 01:43
- Re: Prove something on The determinant of Matrix, Michael Varney, 01:34
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Michael Varney, 01:34
- A perfect number question regarding the Colatz conjecture!, Dan, 01:26
- Re: Question about partial order, William Elliot, 01:14
- negative notation, sizors_1, 01:00
- Re: Real Tetration Solution, Andrew Robbins, 00:48
- Re: help: How do I find the exact postion of a cell when converted from 3D to 1 D?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 00:44
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 00:40
- Prove something on The determinant of Matrix, donkey, 00:36
- Re: complex root at extremum, Robert Israel, 00:31
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin, 00:27
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, jstevh, 00:20
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Christopher J. Henrich, 00:03
January 24, 2006
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, imaginatorium, 22:57
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 22:50
- Re: Open and not open sets in R^2, Rob, 22:34
- Re: Open and not open sets in R^2, Russell, 22:11
- Re: Open and not open sets in R^2, Rob, 21:46
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Chip Eastham, 21:31
- Re: functions of bounded variation, The World Wide Wade, 21:29
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin, 21:24
- Re: Open and not open sets in R^2, W. Dale Hall, 21:09
- Re: Open and not open sets in R^2, singau, 20:47
- Re: An infinite number question, gwlucky, 20:45
- Re: Open and not open sets in R^2, Russell, 20:43
- 2D equi distant points around circle onto around 3D sphere, guitar . is . good, 20:31
- Open and not open sets in R^2, S.M., 20:22
- Re: complex root at extremum, Narasimham, 19:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 19:47
- Re: a prime number question, Phil Carmody, 19:43
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rupert, 19:39
- Re: help: How do I find the exact postion of a cell when converted from 3D to 1 D?, gnh888, 19:30
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rupert, 19:21
- Re: a prime number question, Phil Carmody, 19:09
- Re: complex root at extremum, Robert Israel, 18:55
- Re: probability question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 18:51
- Re: L^2 always complete ?, Robert Israel, 18:49
- Re: probability question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:42
- Re: An infinite number question, gwlucky, 18:41
- complex root at extremum, Narasimham, 18:38
- L^2 always complete ?, Fedor, 18:33
- Re: fractional index polynomial, Robert Israel, 18:28
- Re: Gaussian Probablity function, Schizoid Man, 18:23
- Re: Gaussian Probablity function, Schizoid Man, 18:21
- Re: fractional index polynomial, Ben Luden, 18:21
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Gib Bogle, 18:20
- Re: An infinite number question, Robert Israel, 18:19
- Re: probability question, Robert Israel, 18:13
- fractional index polynomial, Narasimham, 18:12
- Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, Dave Seaman, 18:08
- Re: An infinite number question, Robert Low, 17:56
- Re: How to solve for n_i in W = sum(n_i*p_i/sum(n_i*p_i))?, Robert Israel, 17:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:45
- Re: probability question, Frank Ferrese, 17:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:40
- Re: probability question, Ben Luden, 17:36
- Re: a prime number question, gwlucky, 17:36
- Re: advice for transfering grad student, gwlucky, 17:33
- Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, Proginoskes, 17:32
- Re: figuring out a checksum method, Chris W, 17:30
- Re: Gaussian Probablity function, gwlucky, 17:29
- Re: advice for transfering grad student, Ben Luden, 17:29
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Proginoskes, 17:28
- Re: probability question, Randy Poe, 17:28
- Re: An infinite number question, gwlucky, 17:26
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Robert J. Kolker, 17:17
- Re: Question about partial order, Arturo Magidin, 17:16
- Re: probability question, gwlucky, 17:15
- Re: How to programmatically plot a function?, Raymond Toy, 17:10
- Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, Don Taylor, 17:03
- Re: probability question, Frank Ferrese, 17:02
- Re: probability question, Mkajuma, 16:49
- Re: Integral inequality from Kantorovich's Theorem, Julian V. Noble, 16:47
- Re: An infinite number question, rev.goetz, 16:46
- Re: functions of bounded variation, The World Wide Wade, 16:43
- Re: Question about partial order, agapito6314, 16:42
- Gaussian Probablity function, robison, 16:36
- Re: probability question, The Qurqirish Dragon, 16:30
- Re: Statisitcal Change in Viewing Area between Powers of a Microscope, vumpler, 16:27
- Re: complete set, José Carlos Santos, 16:21
- advice for transfering grad student, Andrew Cousino, 16:09
- Re: help: How do I find the exact postion of a cell when converted from 3D to 1 D?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 16:00
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Tim Peters, 15:43
- Re: probability question, Randy Poe, 15:40
- Re: Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), Keith A. Lewis, 15:38
- Re: probability question, Ben Luden, 15:29
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:19
- [Announcement] Check out blog on history of Fermat's Last Theorem, larry.freeman@xxxxxxxxx, 15:09
- Re: figuring out a checksum method, Ben Luden, 15:09
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, john_ramsden, 15:04
- Re: probability question, Randy Poe, 14:58
- Re: Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), TEZUELLA, 14:57
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 14:49
- Re: a prime number question, Gottfried Helms, 14:48
- Re: Question about partial order, Arturo Magidin, 14:43
- Re: Question about partial order, Ken Pledger, 14:41
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 14:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:35
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Rick Decker, 14:19
- Re: How to solve for n_i in W = sum(n_i*p_i/sum(n_i*p_i))?, pierrelap, 14:17
- Re: whether the space is complete, David C. Ullrich, 14:16
- Re: probability question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:14
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Keith A. Lewis, 14:08
- Re: whether the space is complete, The World Wide Wade, 13:37
- Re: figuring out a checksum method, Chris W, 13:32
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Ed Hook, 13:28
- Re: uniform convergence?, mskirvin, 13:26
- Re: How to solve for n_i in W = sum(n_i*p_i/sum(n_i*p_i))?, Robert Israel, 13:25
- Re: a prime number question, Eric J. Wingler, 13:24
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, W. Dale Hall, 13:22
- Re: Numerical approximation for Student's t, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:20
- Re: probability question, briggs, 13:15
- Re: How to solve for n_i in W = sum(n_i*p_i/sum(n_i*p_i))?, A N Niel, 13:13
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, abe . buckingham, 13:13
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Christopher J. Henrich, 13:06
- Re: a prime number question, Robert Israel, 13:05
- Re: probability question, Randy Poe, 13:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:00
- Re: figuring out a checksum method, Mkajuma, 12:56
- whether the space is complete, eugene, 12:55
- Re: probability question, Ben Luden, 12:55
- Re: figuring out a checksum method, Ben Luden, 12:51
- Re: Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Straydog, 12:42
- Re: probability question, Mkajuma, 12:42
- figuring out a checksum method, Chris W, 12:39
- Re: How to solve for n_i in W = sum(n_i*p_i/sum(n_i*p_i))?, pierrelap, 12:36
- Re: probability question, Ben Luden, 12:33
- Re: How to programmatically plot a function?, Dave Rusin, 12:27
- complete set, quat, 12:27
- Re: probability question, Rod, 12:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 11:57
- Re: probability question, Randy Poe, 11:54
- Re: probability question, Mkajuma, 11:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 11:52
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Randy Poe, 11:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 11:45
- Re: uniform convergence?, A N Niel, 11:44
- Re: probability question, gwlucky, 11:43
- Re: How to solve for n_i in W = sum(n_i*p_i/sum(n_i*p_i))?, A N Niel, 11:41
- probability question, Mkajuma, 11:37
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin, 11:29
- How to solve for n_i in W = sum(n_i*p_i/sum(n_i*p_i))?, pierrelap, 11:22
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Rob Johnson, 11:21
- Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, rip pelletier, 11:13
- Canonical Science Today, and the 2006 Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Juan R., 11:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 11:09
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 10:57
- JSH is a virgin microbe that penetrates with the insistence of air into all the spaces that reason has not been able to fill with words or conventions., Ben Luden, 10:55
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, a1jrj@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:55
- Re: An infinite number question, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 10:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 10:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 10:51
- Re: Help me please, thank you very much!, gwlucky, 10:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 10:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 10:29
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Dik T. Winter, 10:29
- Re: a prime number question, Eric J. Wingler, 10:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 10:27
- uniform convergence?, damage, 10:25
- Re: Question about partial order, Marc Olschok, 10:21
- Help me please, thank you very much!, Jack, 10:16
- Re: Question about partial order, Arturo Magidin, 10:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:07
- Re: Question about partial order, matthias, 10:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 10:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 09:56
- Re: graph layout algorithm, Doni Ocena, 09:54
- Re: Simple probability problem, Randy Poe, 09:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 09:48
- Re: functions of bounded variation, David C . Ullrich, 09:48
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin, 09:40
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin, 09:37
- Re: fourier series, David C . Ullrich, 09:17
- Re: fourier series, David C . Ullrich, 09:17
- Re: How to programmatically plot a function?, Raymond Toy, 09:09
- Re: almost periodic functions, David C . Ullrich, 09:08
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman, 09:02
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman, 09:02
- Re: Simple probability problem, Robert May, 09:01
- Re: Keep it simple, Vin Mariani, 08:56
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Randy Poe, 08:40
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Dave Seaman, 08:37
- New naive roots solving algorithms, arithmonic, 08:31
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, gerben47, 08:28
- Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, John Bailey, 08:19
- ? solving A*X = B with measurement errors, Cheng Cosine, 08:12
- Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, William Elliot, 08:10
- Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Austin Pass, 07:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 07:02
- open questions in linear algebra, Michael, 06:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 06:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 06:39
- a prime number question, gilevgi, 06:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 05:53
- Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, José Carlos Santos, 05:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 05:40
- functions of bounded variation, Simone, 05:36
- Terminology problem, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use), 05:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 05:13
- Re: JSH: Facts don't lie, Michael Varney, 05:06
- Re: JSH: Facts don't lie, Michael Varney, 05:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:00
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Michael Varney, 04:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 04:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:48
- Simple probability problem, tarjanrobert1234, 04:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:35
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, José Carlos Santos, 04:28
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Virgil, 04:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:26
- Re: JSH: Facts don't lie, Virgil, 04:20
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Virgil, 04:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:36
- Re: Invalidity of General Theory of Relativity, brian a m stuckless, 03:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:18
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Larry Lard, 03:10
- Re: derivation of mean, binomial distribution, Robert Israel, 02:30
- Re: proof of validity and proving, Robert Israel, 02:24
- Re: Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), Robert Israel, 02:20
- Re: derivation of mean, binomial distribution, Rob Johnson, 02:16
- Re: Show that resolvent operator L ..., Robert Israel, 02:12
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 02:01
- Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Proginoskes, 02:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 01:59
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 01:50
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Proginoskes, 01:42
- Re: help: How do I find the exact postion of a cell when converted from 3D to 1 D?, gnh888, 01:40
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:31
- derivation of mean, binomial distribution, robison, 01:28
- Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, dchris, 01:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 01:27
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Proginoskes, 01:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 01:24
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 01:24
- JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh, 00:39
- Re: cholesky conjugated gradient method, will, 00:34
- Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, will, 00:33
- Triangle # prime sieve revisited with an answer to a previous question!, Dan, 00:30
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, jstevh, 00:30
- cholesky conjugated gradient method, bowo, 00:18
- Applied mathmatics - straight line eq's + points, BigAl . NZ, 00:12
- proof of validity and proving, yakuza, 00:12
- Re: Snell's Law and Fermat's Principle, Narasimham, 00:05
January 23, 2006
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin, 23:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 23:33
- Re: Question about partial order, William Elliot, 23:31
- Re: Snell's Law and Fermat's Principle, gwlucky, 23:19
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin, 23:18
- Re: Facts don't lie, David Moran, 23:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 23:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 23:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 23:08
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin, 23:03
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Dik T. Winter, 23:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 23:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 22:54
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin, 22:51
- Re: Facts don't lie, jstevh, 22:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 22:49
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Dik T. Winter, 22:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 22:39
- Re: fourier analysis, The World Wide Wade, 22:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 22:32
- Snell's Law and Fermat's Principle, sstrad, 22:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 22:25
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Ujjaval, 22:22
- Question about partial order, agapito6314, 22:18
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Jn, 22:14
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, jstevh, 22:13
- Re: Facts don't lie, Jn, 22:08
- Re: Draft Order, cbrown, 22:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 22:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 21:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 21:53
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker, 21:52
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, jstevh, 21:49
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 21:44
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:42
- JSH: Facts don't lie, jstevh, 21:40
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Rick Decker, 21:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 21:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 21:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, G . Frege, 21:24
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 21:13
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, jstevh, 21:11
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin, 21:08
- Re: Exotic examples please, Kenneth Bull, 21:04
- Re: Draft Order, Don Reble, 21:04
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Proginoskes, 21:01
- Re: rsa number theory, Jules, 20:57
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, jstevh, 20:57
- Re: Exotic examples please, Proginoskes, 20:55
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker, 20:54
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Erik Naggum, 20:52
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin, 20:47
- Numerical approximation for Student's t, Schizoid Man, 20:45
- rsa number theory, Michael Harrington, 20:20
- Re: Draft Order, cbrown, 20:16
- Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:12
- Re: Exotic examples please, matthias, 20:06
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin, 20:01
- Re: U = C/X, pdf f_X(x) is known, and C is a constant, whats f_U(u)?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:53
- Re: Literacy, Mike Kent, 19:47
- Exotic examples please, Kenneth Bull, 19:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 19:39
- Re: Is there a way to solve this integration and differential equations?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 19:34
- Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:22
- Re: fourier series, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:18
- U = C/X, pdf f_X(x) is known, and C is a constant, whats f_U(u)?, kunliu1, 18:58
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 18:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 18:45
- Draft Order, tleveck, 18:44
- Re: fourier series, The World Wide Wade, 18:42
- Re: Cross Products, John, 18:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 18:39
- algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Ujjaval, 18:37
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 18:26
- Re: A question about Probable Primes, Phil Carmody, 18:22
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin, 18:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 17:56
- Re: The Mystery of Numerical Consciousness, bijan, 17:56
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:53
- Re: fourier analysis, Tom Banks, 17:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 17:35
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin, 17:33
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 17:33
- fourier series, figurt, 17:31
- Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, gd1956, 17:31
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 17:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Russell, 17:25
- Re: graph layout algorithm, gwlucky, 17:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 17:25
- Re: JSH: Communication breakdown, Proginoskes, 17:24
- Acrobat Pro 7.0 $69.95 Macromedia, "Ellen Stovall", 17:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 17:19
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 17:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 17:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 17:13
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin, 17:10
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 17:05
- Re: help: How do I find the exact postion of a cell when converted from 3D to 1 D?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 17:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 17:03
- GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE, ACE, 17:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 17:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:56
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 16:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:48
- graph layout algorithm, enigma261, 16:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:45
- Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin, 16:43
- Summation, modulo and decimal, spin9, 16:31
- Re: Permutations, confusion about notation, Arturo Magidin, 16:15
- Re: Permutations, confusion about notation, Randy Poe, 16:14
- Re: Simple Graphing, jclause, 16:13
- Permutations, confusion about notation, robison, 15:51
- Re: fourier analysis, The World Wide Wade, 15:49
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Robert J. Kolker, 15:41
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Robert J. Kolker, 15:40
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Feminazi Cuntkins, 15:38
- Re: Partitioned Circle, Thomas Mautsch, 15:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 15:32
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 15:32
- Re: An observation and question about orthogonality, Thomas Mautsch, 15:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 15:17
- fourier analysis, Tom Banks, 15:17
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 14:54
- Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, John Smith, 14:38
- Re: Method of finding solutions using squared derivatives, Jules, 14:35
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Arturo Magidin, 14:35
- Re: Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), TEZUELLA, 14:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:30
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro, 14:24
- Re: Which integral domains have gcds?, Arturo Magidin, 14:22
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:16
- Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, stephen, 14:16
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:10
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Bill Dubuque, 14:04
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 13:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 13:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 13:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, imaginatorium, 13:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 13:31
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 13:30
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, matthias, 13:23
- Which integral domains have gcds?, Dan Cass, 13:19
- stationary source - definition, computer, 13:12
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 13:05
- Method of finding solutions using squared derivatives, draccarlawpet, 13:01
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:57
- Re: Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 12:49
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, matthias, 12:47
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 12:42
- Coupled PDEs, cfd101, 12:41
- Show that resolvent operator L ..., zetafunction, 12:40
- Re: integrating SQRT[A*sin(w*x) + B*cos(w*x)+C], Robert Israel, 12:39
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 12:35
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 12:33
- Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Jeffrey Rolland, 12:27
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 12:27
- Re: Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), Keith A. Lewis, 12:20
- Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Jeffrey Rolland, 12:13
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Arturo Magidin, 12:08
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 12:02
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker, 11:46
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker, 11:41
- Re: delta function, Robert Israel, 11:29
- Re: skew symmetric map/comples geometry, Jannick Asmus, 11:16
- Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), fox-35@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 11:00
- Re: property for subgroup of GLn, José Carlos Santos, 11:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 10:55
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Pubkeybreaker, 10:52
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, José Carlos Santos, 10:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 10:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 10:38
- New "naive" and so "simple" roots solving algorithms, arithmetic, 10:38
- REPOST: Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Colin Percival, 10:32
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Colin Percival, 10:32
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Robert J. Kolker, 10:19
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Robert J. Kolker, 10:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 10:14
- Re: property for subgroup of GLn, dyaniv2, 10:09
- Re: property for subgroup of GLn, gwlucky, 09:49
- Re: What does this symbol from Maxwell's equations mean?, Randy Poe, 09:46
- Re: What does this symbol from Maxwell's equations mean?, JeffS, 09:38
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker, 09:34
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Chip Eastham, 09:30
- almost periodic functions, Marko Lindner, 09:24
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Timothy Murphy, 09:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 09:13
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, A Aitken, 09:12
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Pubkeybreaker, 08:41
- Re: JSH: Communication breakdown, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 08:34
- REPOST: Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Tom St Denis, 08:28
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Tom St Denis, 08:28
- Re: JSH: Communication breakdown, Michael Varney, 08:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 08:25
- integrating SQRT[A*sin(w*x) + B*cos(w*x)+C], Ilik, 08:24
- Re: Cross Products, Michael Varney, 08:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 08:14
- Re: Q is not a G_delta set, William Elliot, 08:06
- REPOST: Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Pubkeybreaker, 08:05
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Pubkeybreaker, 08:05
- Re: Thermodynamics based on the Hahn-Banach theorem., A N Niel, 08:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 08:01
- Re: JSH: Power of prediction, David C . Ullrich, 08:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 07:57
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, David C . Ullrich, 07:57
- Re: Communication breakdown, David Moran, 07:53
- Re: Integration Problem involving 'e', REJNAL, 07:51
- Re: Why wait?, David Moran, 07:49
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, matthias, 07:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 07:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 07:07
- Re: delta function, Toni Lassila, 06:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila, 06:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:21
- help: How do I find the exact postion of a cell when converted from 3D to 1 D?, news.dyson, 06:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:47
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 23, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:31
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 05:28
- Re: What does this symbol from Maxwell's equations mean?, Larry Lard, 05:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:05
- Re: Q is not a G_delta set, smn, 05:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:58
- Re: Q is not a G_delta set, José Carlos Santos, 04:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:24
- Re: Integration Problem involving 'e', Rob Johnson, 04:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 04:12
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 04:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 03:59
- Re: Integral inequality from Kantorovich's Theorem, Rob Johnson, 03:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 03:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 03:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 03:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 03:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 03:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:36
- Is there a way to solve this integration and differential equations?, comtech, 03:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:12
- Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman, 03:05
- Thermodynamics based on the Hahn-Banach theorem., phbouafia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 03:01
- Q is not a G_delta set, eugene, 02:39
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Bill Dubuque, 02:38
- Will anyone do me a favor to tell me where can I find books/papers about lattice/hyperlattice/superlattice?, yumingfeng25928, 02:23
- Re: Integration Problem involving 'e', REJNAL, 02:14
- Re: Will anyone do me a favor to tell me where can I download some books about hyperlattice/lattice?, yumingfeng25928, 02:06
- Re: Communication breakdown, Jn, 02:02
- Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, Jn, 01:56
- Re: Integration Problem involving 'e', Jn, 01:54
- Integration Problem involving 'e', REJNAL, 01:41
- Re: Integral inequality from Kantorovich's Theorem, Robert Israel, 01:17
- Many Worlds Probability Problem, rev.goetz, 01:10
- Re: Communication breakdown, fishfry, 01:08
- Re: property for subgroup of GLn, Robert Israel, 00:58
- Integral inequality from Kantorovich's Theorem, Eric Thurschwell, 00:34
January 22, 2006
- Re: Power of prediction, Richard Henry, 23:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 23:19
- Re: Communication breakdown, Jn, 22:55
- Re: property for subgroup of GLn, dyaniv2, 22:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Chip Eastham, 22:49
- Re: property for subgroup of GLn, gwlucky, 22:38
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Ronald Bruck, 22:37
- Re: JSH: Communication breakdown, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:35
- Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, Dave Seaman, 22:25
- Re: property for subgroup of GLn, dyaniv2, 22:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 22:13
- Re: A question about Probable Primes, Dik T. Winter, 22:09
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Chip Eastham, 22:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 21:51
- Re: A probably insignificant conjecture...., Gerry Myerson, 21:49
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 21:44
- Re: Cross Products, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 21:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 21:37
- property for subgroup of GLn, dyaniv2, 21:35
- JSH: Communication breakdown, jstevh, 21:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 21:27
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 21:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough, 21:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 21:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 21:05
- Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Proginoskes, 20:58
- Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, Proginoskes, 20:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 20:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough, 20:47
- JSH: Power of prediction, jstevh, 20:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 20:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 20:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 20:32
- Re: Cross Products- and quaternions, JEMebius, 20:31
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 20:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 20:24
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 20:21
- Re: Cross Products, Jim Heckman, 20:18
- Re: Can someone explain this Heisenburg quote on Schrodingers equation, Jim Heckman, 20:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 20:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 20:09
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 20:04
- Russian Torsion Weapon Propulsion as Low-Energy String Theory, Jack Sarfatti, 20:03
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 20:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 20:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 19:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:26
- Re: JSH: Why wait?, David Ames, 19:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:19
- Re: Determine if a moving object will pass within range of point, rory . groves, 19:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 19:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 18:59
- Re: Cross Products, John, 18:56
- Re: Cross Products, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 18:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 18:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 18:45
- Re: Cross Products, john, 18:45
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, matthias, 18:43
- Cross Products, John, 18:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 18:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 18:20
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Ross A. Finlayson, 18:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 18:16
- Re: An infinite number question, bill, 18:00
- Viagra Soft Tabs bestseller, "Gilbert", 17:51
- Re: Subject Selection Query, Gerry Myerson, 17:44
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Rick Decker, 17:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 17:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 17:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 17:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 17:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 17:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 17:14
- Re: Subject Selection Query, Ken Pledger, 17:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 17:08
- B-spline base, Feniks, 17:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 17:00
- Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Peter Allen, 16:52
- Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Jeffrey Rolland, 16:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 16:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 16:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 16:37
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, A Aitken, 16:34
- Re: JSH: Why wait?, David C . Ullrich, 16:34
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 16:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 16:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 16:31
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 16:27
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 16:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 16:23
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, David C . Ullrich, 16:22
- Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Watson Ladd, 16:22
- Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Jeffrey Rolland, 16:20
- Re: Help with this proof., Rob Johnson, 16:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 16:04
- Re: delta function, Robert Israel, 16:03
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 16:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 15:49
- Re: skew symmetric map/comples geometry, singau, 15:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 15:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:45
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Dave Seaman, 15:42
- Re: Monge shuffle relation, alessandra_cabrini, 15:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:37
- Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, José Carlos Santos, 15:36
- Re: JSH: Why wait?, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 15:34
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Gib Bogle, 15:33
- Re: Monge shuffle relation, alessandra_cabrini, 15:33
- Re: Proof of an inequality, Robert Israel, 15:32
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, A Aitken, 15:31
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 15:30
- Re: JSH: Why wait?, Justin, 15:29
- Re: JSH: Why wait?, José Carlos Santos, 15:29
- Re: Proof of an inequality, Peter L. Montgomery, 15:28
- Re: JSH: Why wait?, Gib Bogle, 15:28
- Multiplication Station (OpenSource), ccosse, 15:27
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:27
- Re: Help with this proof., gwlucky, 15:27
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Gib Bogle, 15:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:23
- Re: Help with this proof., R. Colacitti, 15:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 15:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:13
- Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, Randy Poe, 15:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 15:04
- Re: Monge shuffle relation, Michael Harrington, 15:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 14:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:45
- Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, Arturo Magidin, 14:45
- JSH: Why wait?, jstevh, 14:43
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Roman B. Binder, 14:39
- Available: Fractals: The Colors Of Infinity VHS video, Fine Used Books, 14:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:34
- Re: Help with this proof., gwlucky, 14:34
- Re: Help with this proof., Narcoleptic Insomniac, 14:18
- Re: Help with this proof., Rouben Rostamian, 14:11
- Re: Help with this proof., gwlucky, 14:02
- Re: Statisitcal Change in Viewing Area between Powers of a Microscope, G.E. Ivey, 13:56
- Monge shuffle relation, alessandra_cabrini, 13:45
- Re: Help with this proof., R. Colacitti, 13:37
- Flow as exponential of a differential operator, LordBeotian, 13:20
- how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, John Smith, 13:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 13:17
- Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, gwlucky, 13:01
- Re: Help with this proof., Rouben Rostamian, 13:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 12:55
- Re: Proof of an inequality, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:55
- Re: General sudoku: set-theoretic definition, --CELKO--, 12:43
- Digits of e, C W, 12:42
- Levitra, "Reginald", 12:42
- Statisitcal Change in Viewing Area between Powers of a Microscope, vumpler, 12:36
- Digits of e, C W, 12:32
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Ted Hwa, 12:17
- Help with this proof., R. Colacitti, 12:13
- Re: delta function, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:03
- Re: Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Herb Martin, 12:00
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Kenneth Bull, 11:57
- Re: Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Robert J. Kolker, 11:52
- Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, Ron Sperber, 11:46
- Re: Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Herb Martin, 11:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 11:09
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 11:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 11:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 10:57
- Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, José Carlos Santos, 10:39
- Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, Coopoo . Chiou, 10:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 10:32
- Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, Dave Seaman, 10:29
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul, 10:25
- REPOST: Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Colin Percival, 10:11
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Colin Percival, 10:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 10:08
- Re: list of universities math deps. specializing in mathematical logic?, mozert1, 10:05
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 09:56
- Need help with proof for ordered fields, dchris, 09:15
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, David C . Ullrich, 09:02
- Re: Mathematical Model for Transmission, Jeremy, 09:01
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, David Moran, 08:47
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Joseph Ashwood, 07:48
- delta function, tenida@xxxxxxxxx, 07:47
- Re: An infinite number question, Phil Carmody, 07:19
- Re: A question about Probable Primes, Phil Carmody, 07:17
- REPOST: Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Phil Carmody, 06:51
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Phil Carmody, 06:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 06:50
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Phil Carmody, 06:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila, 06:45
- REPOST: Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Phil Carmody, 06:38
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Phil Carmody, 06:38
- Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, gd1956, 06:28
- REPOST: Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Phil Carmody, 06:27
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Phil Carmody, 06:27
- Re: Can someone explain this Heisenburg quote on Schrodingers equation, nightlight, 06:19
- Re: Will anyone do me a favor to tell me where can I download some books about hyperlattice/lattice?, john_ramsden, 06:04
- Re: An infinite number question, The Ghost In The Machine, 06:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 05:54
- Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, Rob Johnson, 05:54
- Re: Can someone explain this Heisenburg quote on Schrodingers equation, nightlight, 05:52
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Ross A. Finlayson, 05:49
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 05:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 05:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 05:13
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 05:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 05:05
- Re: sup{(B'z,f)|f\in G}, Sergiy M.Zhuk, 05:03
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 05:00
- Re: An infinite number question, William Elliot, 04:44
- Re: skew symmetric map/comples geometry, Jannick Asmus, 04:43
- Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, Michael Harrington, 04:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 04:24
- Can someone explain this Heisenburg quote on Schrodingers equation, geffen, 03:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 03:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Chas Brown, 03:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 03:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 03:11
- Re: An infinite number question, gd1956, 03:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Chas Brown, 02:59
- Re: Proof of an inequality, Jim Chill, 02:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 02:54
- Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, gd1956, 02:51
- Re: Proof of an inequality, Jules, 02:46
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, José Carlos Santos, 02:36
- Re: An infinite number question, Proginoskes, 02:17
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Proginoskes, 02:11
- Re: An infinite number question, Arturo Magidin, 02:08
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Proginoskes, 01:47
- Re: An infinite number question, rev.goetz, 01:30
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Tim Peters, 01:15
- Re: An infinite number question, Arturo Magidin, 01:05
- Re: An infinite number question, rev.goetz, 01:01
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Robert Israel, 00:59
- Re: Recursion, Robert Israel, 00:46
- Re: Proof of an inequality, Rob, 00:32
- Re: An infinite number question, Rob, 00:30
January 21, 2006
- Re: An infinite number question, Arturo Magidin, 23:58
- Re: An infinite number question, Rouben Rostamian, 23:55
- Re: Q function, mikelim, 23:47
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 23:39
- An infinite number question, rev.goetz, 23:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 22:44
- Re: A question about Probable Primes, Marc Bogaerts, 22:37
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Doug, 22:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 22:33
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Doug, 22:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 22:27
- Re: The squarefree part of a number, Chip Eastham, 22:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:16
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 22:11
- Re: if f is continuos then f(cl(A)) is a subset of cl(f(A)) ?, William Elliot, 22:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 22:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 21:58
- Re: The squarefree part of a number, Chip Eastham, 21:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 21:43
- REPOST: Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Jens Kruse Andersen, 21:33
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Jens Kruse Andersen, 21:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 21:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 21:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough, 21:11
- Re: sup{(B'z,f)|f\in G}, Jannick Asmus, 21:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 21:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 20:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 20:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 20:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 20:45
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 20:31
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 20:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 20:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 20:04
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Minus XVII, 19:59
- Re: Proof of an inequality, gwlucky, 19:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 19:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 19:48
- Proof of an inequality, Jim Chill, 19:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 19:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:30
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 19:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 19:29
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:27
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 19:26
- REPOST: Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Joseph Ashwood, 19:25
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Joseph Ashwood, 19:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:20
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Arturo Magidin, 19:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 19:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 19:16
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Kenneth Bull, 19:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 19:12
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 19:11
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Kenneth Bull, 19:11
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Arturo Magidin, 19:08
- Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, José Carlos Santos, 19:06
- Re: Notation for Inverse Propotionality?, gwlucky, 19:03
- Re: Notation for Inverse Propotionality?, gwlucky, 19:02
- Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), W, 18:59
- Re: is f' continuous on this interval, José Carlos Santos, 18:58
- Notation for Inverse Propotionality?, dougwedel, 18:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 18:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 18:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 18:49
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 18:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 18:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 18:37
- is f' continuous on this interval, Kobu, 18:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 18:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 18:20
- Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 18:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 18:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 17:59
- Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, David C . Ullrich, 17:54
- A question about Probable Primes, Marc Bogaerts, 17:50
- Re: differentiability of function, David C . Ullrich, 17:39
- REPOST: Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Keith F. Lynch, 17:25
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Keith F. Lynch, 17:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 17:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 17:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 17:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 17:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 17:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 17:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 17:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 16:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:42
- Re: Simple Graphing, Phil Holman, 16:40
- Re: Modification of Mostowski Collapsing Theorem, Dennis May, 16:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 16:26
- Generic Viagra as low as $3.5, "Reginald", 16:24
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 16:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 16:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 15:59
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 15:54
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:49
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 15:41
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 15:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 15:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 14:59
- Simple Graphing, jclause, 14:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 14:43
- Re: Toeplitz Matrix, carlos, 14:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:30
- Re: if f is continuos then f(cl(A)) is a subset of cl(f(A)) ?, Spamless, 14:29
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:27
- Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Naebad, 14:27
- Will anyone do me a favor to tell me where can I download some books about hyperlattice/lattice?, yumingfeng25928, 14:23
- Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Naebad, 14:20
- Re: The squarefree part of a number, Bill Dubuque, 14:15
- Re: How this algorithm of prime factor decomposition works?, Keith A. Lewis, 14:05
- Re: Mathematical Model for Transmission, Andy Spragg, 13:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Keith Ramsay, 13:36
- Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, José Carlos Santos, 13:33
- Re: if f is continuos then f(cl(A)) is a subset of cl(f(A)) ?, José Carlos Santos, 13:26
- Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Richard Harter, 13:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 13:13
- sup{(B'z,f)|f\in G}, Sergiy M.Zhuk, 13:13
- Re: The squarefree part of a number, john_ramsden, 13:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 13:07
- if f is continuos then f(cl(A)) is a subset of cl(f(A)) ?, Jonas, 12:45
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 12:42
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave Seaman, 12:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 12:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 12:04
- Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough, 11:23
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Randy Poe, 11:01
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Rouben Rostamian, 10:42
- skew symmetric map/comples geometry, singau, 09:28
- Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, john_ramsden, 09:25
- Re: Mathematical Model for Transmission, Jeremy Boden, 09:25
- Interesting period oscillations in Goldbach comet, WL, 08:58
- Re: The squarefree part of a number, john_ramsden, 08:57
- Re: The squarefree part of a number, john_ramsden, 08:50
- Re: The squarefree part of a number, john_ramsden, 08:44
- Mathematical Model for Transmission, Jeremy, 08:18
- Re: Infinitesimal Calculus & Continuity, A N Niel, 07:27
- Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, dawenliu, 07:03
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Jim Heckman, 05:22
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Eric Gisse, 05:20
- Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Naebad, 04:43
- Re: Ramanujan's taxicab, Charles Francis, 04:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:50
- Re: The distribution of the minimum distance to the center of an hypersphere, Rob Johnson, 03:09
- Infinitesimal Calculus & Continuity, Math1723, 02:55
- Re: How this algorithm of prime factor decomposition works?, Rob Johnson, 02:46
- Re: differentiability of function, Dusan, 02:46
- Re: list of universities math deps. specializing in mathematical logic?, way_too_scattered, 02:20
- Re: list of universities math deps. specializing in mathematical logic?, MoeBlee, 02:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 02:09
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Ronald Bruck, 01:55
- Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Ronald Bruck, 01:50
- Re: list of universities math deps. specializing in mathematical logic?, way_too_scattered, 01:36
- Re: Sandwich primes!, Dan, 01:10
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Mike Kent, 01:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 00:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 00:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 00:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 00:13
January 20, 2006
- Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, Rouben Rostamian, 23:57
- How this algorithm of prime factor decomposition works?, rickyzhang, 23:41
- The distribution of the minimum distance to the center of an hypersphere, Lior, 23:31
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Karl M. Bunday, 23:03
- Re: General sudoku: set-theoretic definition, Jasen Betts, 22:56
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 22:37
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Colin Percival, 22:23
- Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, Russell, 22:20
- Re: Least Absolute Deviations by Repeated Weighted Least-Squares - HELP!, dontspam, 22:01
- Recursion, Tom, 21:57
- Re: Sandwich primes! Correction!, Oscar Lanzi III, 21:53
- Re: Minimizing Eigenvector, Michael Varney, 21:38
- Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Arturo Magidin, 21:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 21:30
- Re: The squarefree part of a number, Bill Dubuque, 20:48
- Re: Transformation Matrix, Skib, 20:33
- Re: Quadratic extensions and squares, Bill Dubuque, 20:31
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 20:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 20:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 20:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 20:03
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Tom St Denis, 20:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:49
- Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, G Patel, 19:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:28
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Colin Percival, 19:27
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:26
- Human Robot Following Using Parco UWB RFID Tags and Obstacle Detection, kartoun, 19:22
- Re: General sudoku: set-theoretic definition, Patrick Hamlyn, 19:19
- Re: 4 descent needed, Randall, 19:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough, 19:09
- Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Rob Johnson, 18:58
- Re: General sudoku: set-theoretic definition, Proginoskes, 18:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 18:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 18:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:50
- list of universities math deps. specializing in mathematical logic?, mozert1, 18:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:44
- Re: GRAVITATION DEFINED, Michael1, 18:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 18:11
- Re: Real life problem, Dave Rusin, 18:09
- Re: prove the inequation, Thomas Mautsch, 18:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 18:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 17:59
- Re: prove the inequation, Thomas Mautsch, 17:58
- Re: Transformation Matrix, Dave Rusin, 17:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 17:43
- Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Thomas Mautsch, 17:37
- More Math Books for sale, dgiaimo, 17:32
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, way_too_scattered, 17:32
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 17:30
- Re: The squarefree part of a number, Dave Rusin, 17:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 17:28
- Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, Peter L. Montgomery, 17:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 17:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 17:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 17:22
- A class of optimization problems involving supply and demand, DrJones, 17:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 17:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 17:10
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro, 17:09
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 17:08
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Peter L. Montgomery, 17:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 16:59
- Re: The squarefree part of a number, Robert Israel, 16:59
- Re: General sudoku: set-theoretic definition, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 16:45
- Re: probability = 1/infinite ?, Roy, 16:41
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, martin cohen, 16:39
- Re: graph has zero area, Dave L. Renfro, 16:33
- Re: graph has zero area, G. A. Edgar, 16:32
- Re: Singular value decomposition, Virgil, 16:29
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 16:14
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:14
- Re: Lagrange Expansion, Robert Israel, 16:12
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 16:10
- Re: graph has zero area, Robert Israel, 15:59
- Re: Matrix equation: Solve for subset of X in Ax=B, pierrelap, 15:57
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro, 15:50
- Re: IID RV P(X_A<X_B), Toni Lassila, 15:43
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro, 15:40
- Re: list of semigroups, Robert Israel, 15:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:33
- Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:32
- Re: Matrix equation: Solve for subset of X in Ax=B, Randy Poe, 15:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 15:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:11
- Re: IID RV P(X_A<X_B), Randy Poe, 15:10
- Matrix equation: Solve for subset of X in Ax=B, pierrelap, 15:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 15:02
- Re: graph has zero area, Jules, 15:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:53
- Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, Russell, 14:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:49
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Tom St Denis, 14:46
- Re: list of semigroups, stush, 14:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:40
- Re: What is a Borel set?, Jules, 14:35
- IID RV P(X_A<X_B), Intiha, 14:34
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 14:33
- Re: list of semigroups, W. Dale Hall, 14:28
- GRAVITATION DEFINED, ACE, 14:19
- Re: Toeplitz Matrix, carlos, 14:11
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, inquirydog, 14:05
- Re: exponent laws for unknown base, known exponents, Robert Israel, 13:56
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 13:44
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Randy Poe, 13:44
- Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, Robert Israel, 13:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 13:38
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 13:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 13:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 13:27
- Re: { }, zuhair, 13:26
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:26
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, mhill37, 13:25
- Re: MATLAB Command, W. Dale Hall, 13:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:22
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:21
- Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Robert Low, 13:20
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, stush, 13:11
- Re: 3M, Robert Israel, 13:09
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Colin Percival, 13:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:03
- The squarefree part of a number, Oswald Kluge, 13:01
- Minimizing Eigenvector, hurricane, 12:30
- Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Arturo Magidin, 12:00
- Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Arturo Magidin, 11:59
- Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Jonas, 11:59
- Re: complex derivative ?, Lin. S., 11:56
- Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Robert Low, 11:39
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, A N Niel, 11:34
- if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Jonas, 11:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 11:29
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Luc The Perverse, 11:21
- Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Richard Harter, 11:14
- Re: What is a Borel set?, Konrad Viltersten, 11:10
- Re: { }, Richard Harter, 11:09
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, stush, 11:06
- Re: { }, stush, 10:59
- Re: { }, zuhair, 10:52
- Re: What is a Borel set?, José Carlos Santos, 10:51
- Re: What is a Borel set?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:50
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, stush, 10:41
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, stush, 10:39
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, gwlucky, 10:36
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, Nathan, 10:29
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:21
- Re: Singular value decomposition, gwlucky, 10:20
- Re: Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, gwlucky, 10:16
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:15
- Factoring n-1 and n+1 same as factoring n?, stush, 10:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 09:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 09:56
- What is a Borel set?, Konrad Viltersten, 09:54
- Re: What is a Borel set?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:45
- Re: Lagrange Expansion, Mark Robinton, 09:37
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Arturo Magidin, 09:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:35
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Tony Orlow, 09:30
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 09:29
- Re: motivating a kid into analysis, jmfbahciv, 09:27
- Re: Singular value decomposition, Robert Low, 09:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 09:22
- Singular value decomposition, xargon, 09:17
- Re: graph has zero area, G. A. Edgar, 09:15
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, Robert Low, 09:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, briggs, 09:12
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila, 08:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 08:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 08:27
- Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, David C . Ullrich, 08:11
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Pubkeybreaker, 08:00
- finding the love of your life, willrichie, 07:59
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 07:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:36
- Re: Is there a twice differentiable function, agentmath, 07:25
- Re: Continuity of inverse function, Albert, 06:05
- Re: complex integral, Paul Abbott, 06:04
- Re: Continuity of inverse function, Albert, 05:59
- Re: Points that are clopen!, William Elliot, 05:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 05:56
- Re: Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Herb Martin, 05:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 05:49
- Re: { }, William Elliot, 05:38
- list of semigroups, Genaro Juarez Martinez, 05:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 05:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 05:30
- Re: Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Larry Lard, 05:12
- Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Hauke Reddmann, 04:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:28
- Re: Is there a twice differentiable function, José Carlos Santos, 04:25
- Re: Points that are clopen!, Jose Capco, 04:24
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:22
- Re: Points that are clopen!, Jose Capco, 04:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:45
- Pleausantly Pharamga cy, "Asma Drysdale", 03:40
- Re: Continuity of inverse function, The World Wide Wade, 03:25
- Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Naebad, 03:19
- Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, The World Wide Wade, 02:50
- Re: { }, Richard Harter, 02:38
- Re: analysis double integral, The World Wide Wade, 02:31
- Re: MATLAB Command, jjbuchholz, 02:21
- Re: Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Herb Martin, 02:09
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:03
- Re: { }, Proginoskes, 01:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 01:17
- Re: Sandwich primes!, Gerry Myerson, 01:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 00:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, imaginatorium, 00:47
- Re: { }, zuhair, 00:32
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, draccarlawpet, 00:22
- a framework for sculpting a theory T, MoeBlee, 00:22
- exponent laws for unknown base, known exponents, True Raptor, 00:01
January 19, 2006
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 23:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 23:48
- ODE books without differential treatment?, G Patel, 23:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 23:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 23:39
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, A Aitken, 23:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 23:30
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, William Elliot, 23:27
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 23:21
- Re: analysis double integral, William Elliot, 23:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 23:17
- Re: { }, William Elliot, 23:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 23:09
- Re: { }, William Elliot, 23:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 23:05
- Re: Points that are clopen!, way_too_scattered, 23:05
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, Andrew McClure, 23:02
- Re: { }, William Elliot, 23:02
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, way_too_scattered, 23:01
- Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Carlos Moreno, 22:58
- Re: Points that are clopen!, William Elliot, 22:53
- Is there a twice differentiable function, agentmath, 22:49
- Re: Quadratic extensions and squares, Arturo Magidin, 22:47
- Re: analysis double integral, quat, 22:33
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, Navillus, 22:33
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, Pip R. Lagenta, 22:23
- Toeplitz Matrix, Naebad, 22:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 22:09
- Re: Quadratic extensions and squares, Julien Santini, 22:07
- Re: Quadratic extensions and squares, Julien Santini, 21:59
- Re: Sandwich primes!, Dan, 21:55
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, inquirydog, 21:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:34
- Re: Renormalization revisited, WG, 21:27
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 21:27
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, Proginoskes, 21:21
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, Mike Painter, 21:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 21:08
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Rouben Rostamian, 21:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 21:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 20:59
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 20:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 20:54
- Re: Continuity of inverse function, Robert Israel, 20:51
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 20:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 20:45
- Re: Lagrange Expansion, Robert Israel, 20:45
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 20:43
- Re: Continuity of inverse function, Albert, 20:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 20:40
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Robert Israel, 20:39
- Quadratic extensions and squares, Julien Santini, 20:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 20:33
- Re: 3M, Robert Israel, 20:25
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Ken Pledger, 20:24
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, David R Tribble, 20:17
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro, 20:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 20:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 20:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 19:56
- Banco Banesto Medidas de seguridad!!! eMail ID 375109, info, 19:56
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:54
- Re: Continuity of inverse function, Ronald Bruck, 19:54
- Re: { }, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:50
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:48
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:44
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 19:38
- Re: special linear functions, Robert Israel, 19:35
- Re: Continuity of inverse function, Albert, 19:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 19:30
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 19:16
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 19:16
- Re: Conjecture about measure, José Carlos Santos, 19:15
- Transformation Matrix, Skib, 19:12
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 19:06
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 19:06
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 19:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:02
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 19:02
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, Mark VandeWettering, 19:01
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 19:01
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 18:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 18:53
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 18:49
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:48
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, John Wilkins, 18:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:45
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, David W . Cantrell, 18:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:43
- Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, Russell, 18:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 18:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 18:35
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:35
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Bleem Bleom, 18:30
- Conjecture about measure, Jules, 18:29
- Re: Lagrange Expansion, Mark Robinton, 18:25
- Re: graph has zero area, Jules, 18:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:21
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 18:20
- Re: Lagrange Expansion, Ronald Bruck, 18:20
- Re: Lagrange Expansion, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:18
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 18:17
- Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, David Moran, 18:17
- Lagrange Expansion, Mark Robinton, 18:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:15
- Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Rouben Rostamian, 18:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:08
- Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro, 18:06
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, Robert Low, 17:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:57
- Re: new paper, Dave L. Renfro, 17:48
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, way_too_scattered, 17:47
- Re: new paper, mathman, 17:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 17:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:36
- Re: analysis double integral, The World Wide Wade, 17:35
- Re: Continuity of inverse function, Albert, 17:35
- Re: Creationist Mathematics, Jules, 17:34
- Re: graph has zero area, Dave L. Renfro, 17:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 17:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 17:33
- Re: Sandwich primes! Correction!, Dan, 17:32
- Re: Continuity of inverse function, gwlucky, 17:28
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, carlos, 17:26
- Creationist Mathematics, way_too_scattered, 17:25
- Continuity of inverse function, Albert, 17:21
- Re: new paper, Proginoskes, 17:20
- Re: { }, David R Tribble, 17:19
- Ergodic theorem for groups?, Dan, 17:17
- Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, Chip Eastham, 17:05
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, abe . buckingham, 16:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 16:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 16:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 16:45
- Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, Frank Ferrese, 16:44
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Arturo Magidin, 16:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 16:38
- Re: Sandwich primes!, Dan, 16:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 16:34
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, gwlucky, 16:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 16:31
- Re: graph has zero area, Jules, 16:30
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 16:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 16:17
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, draccarlawpet, 16:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 16:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 16:08
- graph has zero area, quat, 15:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 15:55
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 15:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 15:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 15:33
- f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, dawenliu, 15:31
- Re: 3M, Frank Ferrese, 15:24
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Pubkeybreaker, 15:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:12
- Re: 3M, Jaap Spies, 15:11
- 3M, Narasimham, 15:01
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, inquirydog, 15:01
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, inquirydog, 15:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:58
- Re: { }, zuhair, 14:54
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:38
- Re: analysis double integral, quat, 14:29
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Keith A. Lewis, 14:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:28
- Re: Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, Bill Dubuque, 14:23
- Computationally Representing Vernier, Jeffrey Drake, 14:22
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Tony Orlow, 14:20
- Re: Renormalization revisited, WG, 14:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:15
- Re: complete metric space, Daniel Grubb, 14:07
- Re: rotation matrices, bob, 14:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 13:54
- Re: analysis double integral, David C. Ullrich, 13:49
- Re: Lebesgue density theorem, David C. Ullrich, 13:47
- Renormalization revisited, WG, 13:45
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 13:43
- complete metric space, Derek, 13:41
- Re: probability = 1/infinite ?, Roy, 13:37
- Re: analysis double integral, G. A. Edgar, 13:25
- Re: locating a mobile phone in an area, Randy Poe, 13:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 13:07
- Re: WLAN and Light Dimmers - Off Topic, gwlucky, 13:07
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, carlos, 13:03
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, gwlucky, 13:03
- Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Frank Ferrese, 12:56
- Re: WLAN and Light Dimmers - Off Topic, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:56
- Re: MATLAB Command, Frank Ferrese, 12:50
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, briggs, 12:49
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Tony Orlow, 12:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 12:46
- Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, draccarlawpet, 12:43
- Re: is geometric brownian motion process a brownian motion process?, Herman Rubin, 12:43
- Re: locating a mobile phone in an area, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:42
- Re: Lebesgue density theorem, Alexanderz, 12:40
- Re: Markov Chain Problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:40
- Re: Google groups bugs [was: with Q.], Arturo Magidin, 12:36
- Re: Covering space, giovani55, 12:29
- Re: MATLAB Command, Randy Poe, 12:28
- Google groups bugs [was: with Q.], Bill Dubuque, 12:27
- Re: Lebesgue density theorem, Julian Aguirre, 12:24
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Tony Orlow, 12:24
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 12:11
- Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., Frank Ferrese, 12:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:00
- Re: Lebesgue density theorem, David C . Ullrich, 11:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 11:52
- Re: analysis double integral, quat, 11:49
- Re: probability = 1/infinite ?, David C . Ullrich, 11:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:45
- Re: { }, David R Tribble, 11:42
- Re: probability = 1/infinite ?, Robert Israel, 11:42
- MATLAB Command, Frank Ferrese, 11:36
- Re: strange...., mina_world, 11:34
- Re: { }, Richard Harter, 11:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:27
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:15
- WLAN and Light Dimmers - Off Topic, gwlucky, 11:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 11:09
- Re: { }, zuhair, 11:08
- Re: probability = 1/infinite ?, Roy, 11:07
- Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., gwlucky, 11:06
- Lebesgue density theorem, Alex, 11:02
- Re: strange...., mina_world, 11:01
- Re: { }, zuhair, 10:57
- Re: strange...., Keith A. Lewis, 10:46
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 10:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 10:27
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, Robert Low, 10:27
- Re: "Cartesian Coordinate Systems", Robert Low, 10:22
- Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., Rod, 10:14
- Re: Points that are clopen!, John Coleman, 10:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 10:04
- Re: strange...., mina_world, 10:03
- Points that are clopen!, Jose Capco, 10:01
- Re: complex derivative ?, David C . Ullrich, 10:00
- Re: homework help: relatively prime ideals, Arturo Magidin, 09:55
- Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, David C . Ullrich, 09:47
- Re: When two variables are proportional ..., Joseph Fagan, 09:46
- Re: { }, John Coleman, 09:44
- Re: I am looking for a differentiable function, David C . Ullrich, 09:43
- Re: zero of continuous functions, David C . Ullrich, 09:42
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:41
- Re: strange...., Joseph Fagan, 09:40
- Re: with Q., David C . Ullrich, 09:35
- Re: differentiability of function, David C . Ullrich, 09:30
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 09:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:24
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 08:59
- strange...., mina_world, 08:57
- Re: { }, William Elliot, 08:54
- Re: Ramanujan's taxicab, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:51
- Re: { }, leo1476, 08:39
- Re: What's my base?, Keith A. Lewis, 08:34
- Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., Michael Varney, 08:32
- complex derivative ?, Lin. S., 08:30
- Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., Ludwig Prozz, 08:28
- When two variables are proportional ..., Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket, 08:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, briggs, 08:21
- Re: analysis double integral, G. A. Edgar, 08:17
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Keith A. Lewis, 08:09
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 08:02
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Keith A. Lewis, 08:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila, 08:01
- { }, zuhair, 07:58
- Markov Chain Problem, Mubashir, 07:50
- Re: Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, Timothy Murphy, 07:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:42
- Re: analysis double integral, William Elliot, 06:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:30
- Re: locating a mobile phone in an area, Jeremy Boden, 06:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:27
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 06:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:00
- The Road to Reality : A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, Herb Martin, 06:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:59
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 05:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 05:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:24
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:19
- Re: What's my base?, Stephen Merriman, 04:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:01
- Re: prove the inequation, David, 03:47
- Re: Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, Jyrki Lahtonen, 03:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:25
- Re: Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, mskirvin, 03:24
- Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, damage, 03:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:19
- Re: prove the inequation, donkey, 03:03
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:01
- Re: sums of zeta, Paul Abbott, 02:59
- new paper, Michael, 02:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 02:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 02:51
- Re: Covering space, W. Dale Hall, 02:47
- Re: Real life problem, MoeBlee, 02:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 02:43
- Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., sonny746, 02:32
- special linear functions, sonny746, 02:21
- Re: Real life problem, Virgil, 02:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Michael, 02:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:58
- Re: topology on finite sets, William Elliot, 01:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 01:41
- 4 descent needed, Randall, 01:40
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Virgil, 01:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:21
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 01:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:17
- Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., leo1476, 01:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 01:06
- Real life problem, Paul Goodhew, 01:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 01:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 00:54
- analysis double integral, quat, 00:51
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 00:41
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:38
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 00:38
- Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., Me, 00:25
- Re: Least Absolute Deviations by Repeated Weighted Least-Squares - HELP!, Brian Borchers, 00:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 00:22
- Re: Ramanujan's taxicab, titus_piezas, 00:21
- Re: probability = 1/infinite ?, Robert Israel, 00:20
- Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., leo1476, 00:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 00:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 00:07
- Re: Simple question in real analysis, ThickAsABrick, 00:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 00:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 00:04
January 18, 2006
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 23:57
- Least Absolute Deviations by Repeated Weighted Least-Squares - HELP!, dontspam, 23:56
- Re: Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, Doug B, 23:52
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 23:49
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Tony Orlow, 23:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, imaginatorium, 23:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 23:38
- What's my base?, Mike, 23:35
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Tony Orlow, 23:33
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Carlos Moreno, 23:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 23:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 23:24
- Re: Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, Timothy Murphy, 23:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 23:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 23:18
- Re: rotation matrices, bob, 23:16
- probability = 1/infinite ?, Roy, 23:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 22:59
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 22:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, examachine, 22:17
- Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., Ludwig Prozz, 22:14
- Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., David Dathe, 22:08
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, inquirydog, 22:01
- Re: Simple question in real analysis, Peter L. Montgomery, 21:53
- Re: "Cartesian Coordinate Systems", gwlucky, 21:50
- Re: Simple question in real analysis, Rupert, 21:46
- Re: "Cartesian Coordinate Systems", shmurray, 21:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 21:40
- Re: "Cartesian Coordinate Systems", shmurray, 21:39
- Re: The Universe is 2-dimensional; was: Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, Proginoskes, 21:37
- The Universe is 2-dimensional; was: Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, Proginoskes, 21:32
- Re: Problem 1C in Milnor-Stasheff, William Elliot, 21:28
- Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, Rouben Rostamian, 21:28
- Simple question in real analysis, ThickAsABrick, 21:28
- "Cartesian Coordinate Systems", i . love . jeevitha, 21:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 21:19
- Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, Doug B, 21:17
- Re: General sudoku: set-theoretic definition, Proginoskes, 21:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 21:09
- Re: origami catenoid, Narasimham, 21:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 21:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 20:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 20:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 20:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 20:50
- Re: topology on finite sets, Michael B. Williams, 20:49
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 20:47
- Re: Problem on complex derivative, Lin. S., 20:19
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Gerard Schildberger, 20:16
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dik T. Winter, 19:59
- topology on finite sets, hagada, 19:58
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dik T. Winter, 19:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 19:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 19:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 19:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 19:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:34
- Re: origami catenoid, Narasimham, 19:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 19:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 19:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:09
- Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, damage, 19:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 19:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 18:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 18:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 18:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 18:42
- Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, damage, 18:37
- Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, The World Wide Wade, 18:29
- Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, damage, 18:26
- Re: homework help: relatively prime ideals, Jannick Asmus, 18:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:19
- Covering space, giovani55, 18:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:17
- [RE] Jan 18, 2006 Shareholder Release, "Delbert Ransom", 18:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:14
- Re: Irreducibility, Gerry Myerson, 18:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 18:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 18:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:04
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 18:03
- Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Roman B. Binder, 18:03
- Re: Sandwich primes!, Gerry Myerson, 18:01
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Virgil, 18:01
- Re: FPOTD # 10, Microwaved Nuts (PIC) 1/18/2006, Clifford J. Nelson, 18:00
- homework help: relatively prime ideals, HY, 17:59
- Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, Rouben Rostamian, 17:58
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Minus XVII, 17:57
- Re: prove the inequation, Thomas Mautsch, 17:56
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 17:56
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dave (from the UK), 17:54
- a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, damage, 17:50
- Re: origami catenoid, Sean McIlroy, 17:40
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, man_in_black529, 17:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 17:33
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 17:23
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 17:20
- Re: zero to the power zero, Rob Johnson, 17:20
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 17:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 17:14
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 17:13
- Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Randy Poe, 17:10
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, michaeld, 17:09
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 17:09
- Re: zero to the power zero, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 17:04
- Re: zero of continuous functions, Dave L. Renfro, 17:02
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 17:01
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 16:56
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 16:54
- Re: zero to the power zero, Robert J. Kolker, 16:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 16:47
- Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Tony Orlow, 16:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 16:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 16:41
- Re: zero of continuous functions, The World Wide Wade, 16:37
- Re: Irreducibility, Robert Israel, 16:26
- Re: origami catenoid, Keith A. Lewis, 16:16
- Re: Solving system of two equations, Robert Israel, 16:13
- Re: with Q., gwlucky, 16:11
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:03
- Re: with Q., Arturo Magidin, 16:03
- origami catenoid, Sean McIlroy, 15:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 15:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:36
- Re: with Q., Dave Rusin, 15:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:31
- Re: statistical problem, Rob Johnson, 15:30
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:29
- Re: Standard four letter expressions of PISA, Korkki . Emulainen, 15:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 15:23
- Re: zero of continuous functions, David C. Ullrich, 15:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:17
- Re: zero to the power zero, Rob Johnson, 15:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 15:04
- Sandwich primes!, Dan, 15:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:03
- Re: zero of continuous functions, Michael, 15:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:59
- Re: zero of continuous functions, Michael, 14:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:37
- Re: General sudoku: set-theoretic definition, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:35
- Re: is geometric brownian motion process a brownian motion process?, A N Niel, 14:33
- Re: statistical problem, Jonas, 14:29
- Re: is geometric brownian motion process a brownian motion process?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:13
- Re: with Q., Michael Stemper, 14:06
- Re: x * 0 = 1, singau, 14:05
- Re: with Q., gwlucky, 14:01
- Re: zero of continuous functions, Dave L. Renfro, 14:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 13:59
- Re: differential equations and linguistics, gwlucky, 13:57
- Re: zero of continuous functions, The World Wide Wade, 13:56
- Re: differential equations and linguistics, Keith A. Lewis, 13:48
- Re: zero of continuous functions, David C. Ullrich, 13:41
- Re: statistical problem, Keith A. Lewis, 13:40
- Re: x * 0 = 1, GoToUkraine, 13:38
- Re: x * 0 = 1, gwlucky, 13:37
- Re: zero to the power zero, Michael Stemper, 13:31
- Re: I am looking for a differentiable function, agentsolver, 13:29
- Re: I am looking for a differentiable function, José Carlos Santos, 13:23
- x * 0 = 1, GoToUkraine, 13:22
- Re: with Q., gwlucky, 13:20
- Re: zero of continuous functions, Michael, 13:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 13:16
- I am looking for a differentiable function, agentsolver, 13:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 13:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 13:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 12:57
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 12:56
- Re: with Q., Arturo Magidin, 12:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 12:39
- Re: zero of continuous functions, Dave L. Renfro, 12:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 12:36
- Re: with Q., gwlucky, 12:30
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman, 12:30
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 12:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 12:28
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:27
- Re: with Q., Dave Seaman, 12:25
- Adobe Photoshop Elements 3.0 - Our price: $30, "Rogert", 12:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 12:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 12:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 12:15
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 12:15
- zero of continuous functions, Michael, 12:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 12:10
- Microsoft Office XP Professional - Our price: $110, "Geoffrey", 12:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 12:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 12:03
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 12:03
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 12:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 12:00
- Orwell and Fuller, Clifford J. Nelson, 11:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 11:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 11:48
- differential equations and linguistics, alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:37
- Re: Phase in frequency convolution, Randy Poe, 11:37
- Re: zero to the power zero, G. A. Edgar, 11:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila, 11:36
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman, 11:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 11:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 11:24
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 11:24
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Rusin, 11:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 11:18
- Re: zero to the power zero, Rob Johnson, 11:15
- Re: with Q., gwlucky, 11:15
- Re: "a/b" stuff - please help!, almurph, 10:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 10:58
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman, 10:53
- Re: Self made mathematician, gwlucky, 10:51
- Problem on complex derivative, Lin. S., 10:44
- Re: statistical problem, Jonas, 10:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 10:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 10:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 10:36
- Re: Phase in frequency convolution, Pablo M, 10:33
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dave (from the UK), 10:31
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 10:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 10:28
- Re: zero to the power zero, Rob Johnson, 10:25
- Re: statistical problem, Rob Johnson, 10:23
- Re: Self made mathematician, david bandel, 10:22
- Re: zero to the power zero, Robert Low, 10:21
- Re: rotation matrices, gwlucky, 10:19
- Re: Ramanujan's taxicab, david bandel, 10:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 10:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 10:06
- Re: statistical problem, david bandel, 10:03
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 10:03
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman, 10:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 09:56
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman, 09:54
- Re: "a/b" stuff - please help!, The Qurqirish Dragon, 09:54
- Re: "a/b" stuff - please help!, Arturo Magidin, 09:51
- Re: "a/b" stuff - please help!, Robert Low, 09:50
- Re: differentiability of function, Karel, 09:50
- Re: I'm so confused..., Daniel Grubb, 09:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 09:40
- "a/b" stuff - please help!, almurph, 09:37
- Re: rotation matrices-, JEMebius, 09:32
- Re: with Q., Arturo Magidin, 09:30
- Re: rotation matrices, Jyrki Lahtonen, 09:26
- Re: sum/sigma and modulus of a decimal number, spin9, 09:23
- Re: zero to the power zero, Robert Low, 09:20
- Re: statistical problem, Mathue Hagen, 09:11
- Re: Phase in frequency convolution, Mathue Hagen, 09:07
- Re: sum/sigma and modulus of a decimal number, Peter Webb, 08:57
- Phase in frequency convolution, Pablo M, 08:53
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dave (from the UK), 08:47
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dave (from the UK), 08:41
- Re: I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich, 08:38
- Re: differentiability of function, David C . Ullrich, 08:36
- statistical problem, Jonas, 08:33
- Adobe Photoshop CS2 - Our price: $80, "Henry", 08:05
- Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., katy, 08:05
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman, 07:52
- Re: rotation matrices- PitchYaw, JEMebius, 07:51
- Re: with Q., Nobody, 07:41
- Re: zero to the power zero, G. A. Edgar, 07:38
- Re: zero to the power zero, G. A. Edgar, 07:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:27
- Re: finite sum, temptony, 07:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:14
- with Q., mina_world, 07:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:07
- Re: rotation matrices, bob, 06:40
- Re: Regression - Least squares, Oscar Lanzi III, 06:37
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul, 06:25
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, Robert Israel, 06:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:03
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:59
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 05:59
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 05:56
- Re: rotation matrices, Jyrki Lahtonen, 05:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 05:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 05:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 05:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert Low, 05:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:03
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:54
- Re: zero to the power zero, Markus Sigg, 04:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:51
- Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Hauke Reddmann, 04:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 04:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:14
- Transcendence degree of Coeff f, viz, 04:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:12
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:53
- Re: Regression - Least squares, Rod, 03:51
- Re: Problem 1C in Milnor-Stasheff, William Elliot, 03:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:46
- Re: adult dating made easy, William Elliot, 03:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:42
- Re: Completely confused about the area of circles, Robert Low, 03:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:37
- Re: zero to the power zero, Robert Low, 03:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:34
- Re: differentiability of function, Karel, 03:30
- Re: differentiability of function, Karel, 03:30
- Re: rotation matrices, bob, 03:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:27
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 03:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 03:16
- Re: rotation matrices, Jyrki Lahtonen, 02:52
- Re: rotation matrices, Ted Hwa, 02:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 02:31
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 02:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 02:18
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, a_plutonium, 02:12
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 02:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 02:02
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, a_plutonium, 02:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 02:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:54
- Re: Solving system of two equations, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 01:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 01:50
- sum/sigma and modulus of a decimal number, spin9, 01:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 01:42
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 01:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 01:33
- Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation, Randall, 01:22
- Re: relatively prime ideals ..., Peter L. Montgomery, 01:16
- Re: Irreducibility, quasi, 01:13
- Re: rotation matrices, bob, 01:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 01:01
- Re: Solving system of two equations, john_ramsden, 00:59
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 00:55
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 00:46
- Re: adult dating made easy, fishfry, 00:06
January 17, 2006
- relatively prime ideals ..., HY, 23:49
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 23:44
- Re: Minimal Area Canopy, Mathue Hagen, 23:25
- Re: rotation matrices, Ted Hwa, 23:25
- Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional - Our price: $120, "Rogert", 23:05
- Irreducibility, Julien Santini, 23:04
- Re: Solving system of two equations, richard . blankman, 22:58
- Re: finite sum, William Elliot, 22:47
- rotation matrices, bob, 22:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 22:39
- Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman, 22:30
- Re: Regression - Least squares, Oscar Lanzi III, 22:27
- finite sum, Tobin Fricke, 22:27
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 22:24
- Re: I'm so confused..., Dave Rusin, 22:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 22:15
- adult dating made easy, bangkokallan, 22:09
- Solving system of two equations, dontspam, 22:08
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 21:54
- Re: Completely confused about the area of circles, PeterMacKenzie, 21:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 21:42
- Re: Proofs of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms, kartoun, 21:39
- Re: Completely confused about the area of circles, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:33
- Completely confused about the area of circles, PeterMacKenzie, 21:23
- Funny! More offers to select a search engine!, wycareer, 21:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 21:07
- Re: I'm so confused..., Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 20:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 20:25
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul, 20:16
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, David R Tribble, 20:09
- Re: Regression - Least squares, Gottfried Helms, 20:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:43
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 19:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:31
- Re: with simple inequality, mina_world, 19:24
- is geometric brownian motion process a brownian motion process?, comtech, 19:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 19:14
- Re: zero to the power zero, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 18:53
- zero to the power zero, Paul Connolly, 18:44
- re: Information Update, "Shauna Crabtree", 18:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:34
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, Proginoskes, 17:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 17:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:20
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, Proginoskes, 17:20
- Problem 1C in Milnor-Stasheff, vypertd@xxxxxxxxx, 17:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 17:19
- Re: method of characteristics help, Robert Israel, 17:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 17:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 17:12
- Re: discrete form for grad(div v), Robert Israel, 17:11
- Re: Gaussin integers, Bill Dubuque, 17:09
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:06
- Re: method of characteristics help, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 16:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 16:57
- Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., Robert Israel, 16:53
- Re: Self made mathematician, gwlucky, 16:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 16:50
- Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., Keith A. Lewis, 16:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 16:49
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul, 16:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 16:31
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 16:30
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 16:25
- Re: Self made mathematician, gwlucky, 16:22
- method of characteristics help, quat, 16:10
- Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., Ronald Bruck, 16:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 16:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 15:55
- MS Windows XP Professional SP2 - Our price: $65, "Nicholas", 15:50
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 15:45
- Re: discrete form for grad(div v), C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:44
- Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, Rob Johnson, 15:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 15:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 15:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:23
- Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional - Our price: $120, "Nicholas", 15:19
- Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:12
- Re: Russell set..., Herman Rubin, 14:56
- Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, Rob Johnson, 14:51
- Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., A N Niel, 14:46
- Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, Herman Rubin, 14:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 14:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 14:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:30
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 14:27
- Re: Regression - Least squares, Herman Rubin, 14:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 14:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 14:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 14:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 14:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 14:10
- Re: with simple inequality, The World Wide Wade, 14:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:05
- Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Rob Johnson, 14:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 13:59
- Get Pr0zac today from Boyer's Drug0utlet Vw9khvL, "Gina Mccormick", 13:54
- Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:54
- Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., katy, 13:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 13:49
- Re: Example or counterexample in differentiation problems, David C. Ullrich, 13:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 13:43
- Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., Keith A. Lewis, 13:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 13:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 13:28
- convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., katy, 13:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:19
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, Robert Israel, 13:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Michael Stemper, 13:12
- Re: How should mathematical models be produced?, cbrown, 13:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:03
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 12:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:46
- Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Daniel Grubb, 12:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 12:35
- Re: Regression - Least squares, gwlucky, 12:35
- Re: Example or counterexample in differentiation problems, agentmath, 12:27
- Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Rouben Rostamian, 12:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 12:25
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 12:21
- Example or counterexample in differentiation problems, agentmath, 12:21
- Re: find x. humor~, agentmath, 12:18
- Re: calculation of integral, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 12:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 12:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 12:15
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl, 12:12
- Re: calculation of integral, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 12:10
- Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, gwlucky, 12:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 12:10
- Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 12:05
- Re: with simple inequality, Alex. Lupas, 12:04
- find x. humor~, mina_world, 11:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 11:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 11:57
- Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, Purzelbiene, 11:46
- Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional - Our price: $120, "Simon", 11:43
- Re: Galois group calculation, steiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:39
- Re: Galois group calculation, adomplayer, 11:27
- Re: Russell set..., Richard Harter, 11:21
- sim. solution to quadratic bivariate equations, Markus Moll, 11:14
- with simple inequality, mina_world, 11:13
- Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, gwlucky, 11:08
- Re: I'm so confused..., Daniel Grubb, 11:06
- Re: Self made mathematician, conesetter, 10:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 10:35
- high-dimensional squared sum probability, Purzelbiene, 10:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 10:10
- Re: inequality, Rob Johnson, 10:04
- Re: super-Hopf algebras, José Carlos Santos, 09:58
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), David C . Ullrich, 09:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 09:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 09:34
- Re: Continuously parameterized fractal dimension. Was Re: help needed!!!!!!!!, Randy Poe, 09:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 09:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 09:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 09:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 09:13
- Re: Continuously parameterized fractal dimension. Was Re: help needed!!!!!!!!, SagarC., 09:09
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 09:05
- Re: inf{(Qx,x)|Fx=h}, Jannick Asmus, 09:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 09:02
- Re: prove the inequation, Pubkeybreaker, 08:56
- Re: Russell set..., Darren, 08:54
- Re: Self made mathematician, JDrozen, 08:42
- Re: inequality, BSK, 08:13
- Re: Self made mathematician, G. A. Edgar, 08:12
- Re: calculation of integral, A N Niel, 08:09
- Re: inequality, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 07:52
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Dave Seaman, 07:43
- Re: super-Hopf algebras, Sacha Blumen, 07:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:27
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila, 07:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:17
- Re: inf{(Qx,x)|Fx=h}, Sergiy M. Zhuk, 07:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 07:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:12
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 07:05
- Re: stat problem, Torsten Hennig, 07:02
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul, 06:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:12
- inequality, Wilbert, 06:09
- stat problem, Bill Taylor, 06:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:05
- Re: calculation of integral, Michael Jørgensen, 05:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:49
- euler characteristic of a surface presentation, Bill Taylor, 05:46
- Ramanujan's taxicab, titus_piezas, 05:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:44
- calculation of integral, magda, 05:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:41
- Russell set..., mina_world, 05:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:35
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:18
- Re: Regression - Least squares, Rod, 05:17
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), , 05:13
- Re: prove the inequation, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 05:12
- Re: Group Theory - clarification/motivation, Guy Corrigall, 04:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 04:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 04:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 04:32
- Insphere of a tetrahedron, Hauke Reddmann, 04:26
- Re: Regression - Least squares, Virgil, 04:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:11
- stat problem, Michael Jørgensen, 04:07
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:56
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, a_plutonium, 03:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:44
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, a_plutonium, 03:40
- Re: prove the inequation, donkey, 03:34
- Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional - Our price: $120, "Alexander", 02:36
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 02:20
- Re: Efficient gcd-tuple construction?, Proginoskes, 02:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 01:18
- Microsoft Office XP Professional - Our price: $110, "Philip", 01:09
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, imaginatorium, 00:31
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 00:06
- Hardy's page 123 Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, a_plutonium, 00:05
January 16, 2006
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Keith F. Lynch, 23:53
- Re: differentiability of function, The World Wide Wade, 23:41
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, Robert Israel, 23:23
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 23:05
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, gwlucky, 22:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 22:39
- Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, gwlucky, 22:27
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 22:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 22:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 22:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 22:01
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul, 21:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 21:54
- discrete form for grad(div v), NordinZ, 21:53
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Christopher J. Henrich, 21:49
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Keith F. Lynch, 21:48
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Keith F. Lynch, 21:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 21:39
- Inequalities for convex functions, Alex. Lupas, 21:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 21:35
- Re: How should mathematical models be produced?, Bryan Bishop, 21:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:24
- Re: simple PDE, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:18
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 21:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:14
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 20:53
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, fernando revilla, 20:52
- Re: Galois group calculation, Peter L. Montgomery, 20:47
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 20:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 20:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 20:42
- Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 20:38
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 20:33
- Re: Ellipse Construction., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 20:25
- linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul, 20:00
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, True Raptor, 19:53
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Dik T. Winter, 19:52
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:48
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 19:47
- Re: simple PDE, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:47
- Re: Streamlines of a potential flow?, John Schutkeker, 19:39
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Ronald Bruck, 19:27
- simple PDE, quat, 19:14
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:14
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, gwlucky, 19:09
- Re: Ellipse Construction., jeuro, 19:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen, 19:02
- Re: Self made mathematician, gwlucky, 19:01
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Martin Wanvik, 18:59
- Galois group calculation, adomplayer, 18:58
- Re: Ellipse Construction., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 18:40
- Re: Self made mathematician, gwlucky, 18:39
- Re: Ellipse Construction., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 18:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 18:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 18:29
- Re: Ellipse Construction., jeuro, 18:24
- Re: Self made mathematician, gwlucky, 18:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:59
- Re: examples, David C . Ullrich, 17:59
- re: January 16, 2006 Inv Update, "Martina Lassiter", 17:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:50
- Re: Ellipse Construction., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 17:45
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:38
- Re: Need help with a summation problem..., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 17:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 17:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:24
- Re: Self made mathematician, quasi, 17:20
- Re: examples, Robert Israel, 17:18
- Re: inf{(Qx,x)|Fx=h}, Jannick Asmus, 17:12
- Re: Ellipsoid equation - converting from algebraic, Roger Rowland, 17:08
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Robert Israel, 17:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 17:01
- Re: Self made mathematician, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 16:52
- Re: Minimal Area Canopy, Mathue Hagen, 16:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 16:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 16:42
- Re: Poisson Stochastic Process, David M Einstein, 16:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 16:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 16:33
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 16:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 16:26
- Self made mathematician, JDrozen, 16:25
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Robert Sheskey, 16:24
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 16:23
- Ellipse Construction., jeuro, 16:20
- projective simplicial sets, singau, 16:12
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 16:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 16:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 16:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 15:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:53
- Re: Need help with a summation problem..., oseithedude, 15:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 15:48
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 15:42
- Re: Sum of truncated normal variables, Herman Rubin, 15:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:39
- examples, leo1476, 15:38
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, rip pelletier, 15:36
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Herman Rubin, 15:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:32
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Herman Rubin, 15:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 15:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:22
- Re: Ellipsoid equation - converting from algebraic, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 15:20
- Minimal Area Canopy, Narasimham, 15:20
- Re: Poisson Stochastic Process, Derek, 15:14
- Re: Need help with a summation problem..., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:13
- Ellipsoid equation - converting from algebraic, Roger Rowland, 15:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:09
- Re: Elementary probabilty problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:07
- Re: ONE, MoeBlee, 15:02
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:00
- Need help with a summation problem..., oseithedude, 14:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 14:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:48
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Dave Seaman, 14:48
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:40
- Re: Someone knows this? Need help with an equation., Ken Pledger, 14:38
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:33
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:24
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 14:22
- Re: Someone knows this? Need help with an equation., Dirk Van de moortel, 14:13
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), John Gabbriel, 14:00
- Re: Poisson Stochastic Process, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:58
- Re: Poisson Stochastic Process, David M Einstein, 13:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 13:43
- Someone knows this? Need help with an equation., Jolie, 13:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 13:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David Hartley, 13:29
- Inequalities for convex functions, alexandru . lupas, 13:18
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 13:15
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Dave Seaman, 13:02
- Re: random variables - simple questions, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 12:58
- Poisson Stochastic Process, Derek, 12:56
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Michael Stemper, 12:55
- Re: ? something similar to similarity matrices, Robert Israel, 12:50
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), John Gabbriel, 12:50
- inf{(Qx,x)|Fx=h}, Sergiy M.Zhuk, 12:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 12:23
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Christopher J. Henrich, 12:20
- Re: Gaussin integers, mskirvin, 12:10
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, G.E. Ivey, 12:00
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, G.E. Ivey, 11:58
- Gaussin integers, Isura, 11:26
- Re: Elementary probabilty problem, Rob Johnson, 11:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 11:14
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 11:04
- Re: covergent series, David C . Ullrich, 10:59
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 10:59
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 10:57
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, michaeld, 10:53
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, David C . Ullrich, 10:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 10:51
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 10:49
- Re: Fields, Pete Klimek, 10:48
- Re: I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich, 10:45
- Re: I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich, 10:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 10:31
- Re: Elementary probabilty problem, Peter Webb, 09:45
- Re: Efficient gcd-tuple construction?, Oswald Kluge, 09:35
- Re: Cube root computation, Randy Poe, 09:32
- Hom as a representable functor?, Stephen Lavelle, 09:30
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 09:24
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 09:18
- Re: Fields, Abdulla, 09:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 08:38
- Re: Fields, Pubkeybreaker, 08:27
- Re: Cube root computation, Tim Prince, 08:20
- Re: covergent series, quasi, 08:20
- Fields, Abdulla, 08:19
- Re: Sum of truncated normal variables, Hicham Daher, 08:12
- Re: difference between partial derivative, and derivative, Pubkeybreaker, 08:01
- Elementary probabilty problem, Bipp, 07:58
- FW: Renew your education, "Sondra Noel", 07:57
- Re: difference between partial derivative, and derivative, Kaimbridge, 07:55
- difference between partial derivative, and derivative, damage, 07:10
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), denis feldmann, 06:40
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Martin Wanvik, 06:13
- Re: 3 equations with 3 variables on a Ti-89 Titanium?, Ken Oliver, 05:54
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 16, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:41
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 05:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:44
- Cube root computation, johnywalkyra, 04:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:39
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 04:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 04:01
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:52
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:38
- Re: covergent series, Mkajuma, 03:17
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Virgil, 02:53
- Re: covergent series, José Carlos Santos, 02:49
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Virgil, 02:49
- Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Darren, 02:33
- Re: random variables - simple questions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 02:28
- Re: ? something similar to similarity matrices, Cheng Cosine, 02:16
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, a_plutonium, 02:16
- Re: How should mathematical models be produced?, cbrown, 02:10
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, a_plutonium, 02:01
- Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), John Gabbriel, 01:59
- Re: ? something similar to similarity matrices, Cheng Cosine, 01:57
- Re: Singular, Gottfried Helms, 01:52
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Bill Dubuque, 01:30
- Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), Robert Israel, 01:29
- Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, abe . buckingham, 01:25
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes, 01:08
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes, 01:02
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes, 00:57
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Bill Dubuque, 00:50
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes, 00:46
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes, 00:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 00:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 00:28
- Re: covergent series, quasi, 00:19
- Re: covergent series, leo1476, 00:09
- covergent series, leo1476, 00:02
January 15, 2006
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi, 23:36
- Find the center of unicyclic graph, Wilma, 23:32
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Luke Wu, 23:23
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, True Raptor, 23:18
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi, 23:18
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, sengal . kiru, 23:13
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Luke Wu, 22:53
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:47
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi, 22:40
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi, 22:31
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi, 22:20
- Re: determinant not zero, Someonekicked, 22:16
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Luke Wu, 22:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 21:59
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Virgil, 21:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 21:43
- Re: determinant not zero, Peter L. Montgomery, 21:33
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi, 21:24
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Kenneth Bull, 21:06
- Re: Singular, The World Wide Wade, 20:42
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, The World Wide Wade, 20:36
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 20:31
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi, 20:20
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Bjorn Edstrom, 20:13
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi, 20:06
- Re: Singular, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 20:00
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Bjorn Edstrom, 19:53
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, john_ramsden, 19:53
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Kenneth Bull, 19:48
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi, 19:45
- Re: JOHN R RAMSDEN, I didn´t know how to contact you again!, mzafrullah, 19:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 19:37
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 19:26
- Re: Second derivative test, quasi, 19:26
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, john_ramsden, 19:20
- Re: Shadow of Rim in Bowl, Hero, 19:19
- Re: ONE, MoeBlee, 19:17
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, john_ramsden, 19:13
- Re: number combinations of components, Abstract Dissonance, 19:10
- determinant not zero, Someonekicked, 19:09
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi, 19:03
- Re: Second derivative test, The World Wide Wade, 18:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:55
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, The World Wide Wade, 18:52
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Rob Johnson, 18:49
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, True Raptor, 18:42
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi, 18:39
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, True Raptor, 18:36
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Kenneth Bull, 18:31
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Kenneth Bull, 18:28
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, john_ramsden, 18:18
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 18:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson, 18:12
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 18:10
- Re: random variables - simple questions, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 18:04
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 18:01
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi, 18:00
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:55
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, A Aitken, 17:54
- Re: 3 equations with 3 variables on a Ti-89 Titanium?, quasi, 17:53
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:51
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, A Aitken, 17:43
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, A Aitken, 17:39
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, JeeBee, 17:35
- Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), W, 17:34
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Rob, 17:33
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 17:31
- Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, David Moran, 17:29
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, David Park, 17:26
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Keith F. Lynch, 17:22
- Re: 3 equations with 3 variables on a Ti-89 Titanium?, jakob, 17:21
- on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Kenneth Bull, 17:19
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, john_ramsden, 17:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown, 17:16
- Re: 3 equations with 3 variables on a Ti-89 Titanium?, Michael Varney, 17:12
- Re: Inequality., haoc, 16:58
- Re: bipartite graph min-cost problem, leibnizster, 16:57
- Re: JOHN R RAMSDEN, I didn´t know how to contact you again!, john_ramsden, 16:48
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, bert, 16:22
- Re: I'm so confused..., john_ramsden, 16:18
- Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 15:59
- Re: I'm so confused..., Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:47
- Re: differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 15:35
- Re: 3 equations with 3 variables on a Ti-89 Titanium?, quasi, 15:34
- Re: Second derivative test, Kenneth Bull, 15:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 15:29
- Re: Inequality., quasi, 15:17
- Re: Inequality., quasi, 15:12
- 3 equations with 3 variables on a Ti-89 Titanium?, Jakob, 15:10
- Re: complex integral, tanabai, 15:10
- Re: bipartite graph min-cost problem, Igor Khavkine, 15:00
- Re: Inequality., Igor Khavkine, 14:50
- Re: Second derivative test, quasi, 14:45
- Re: complex integral, Igor Khavkine, 14:43
- Re: I'm so confused..., Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:42
- bipartite graph min-cost problem, leibnizster@xxxxxxxxx, 14:31
- Re: I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich, 14:29
- Re: I'm so confused..., Igor Khavkine, 14:28
- Re: I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich, 14:28
- Re: complex integral, tanabai, 14:23
- Re: I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich, 14:21
- Re: How should mathematical models be produced?, peterX, 14:18
- Inequality., haoc, 14:02
- Re: Are the rationals a subset of the reals?, Ross A. Finlayson, 13:42
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Bjorn Edstrom, 13:35
- Re: complex integral, Igor Khavkine, 13:32
- Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, Rob Johnson, 13:28
- Re: I'm so confused..., José Carlos Santos, 13:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 13:26
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, quasi, 13:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 13:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 13:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 13:07
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 13:03
- Re: random variables - simple questions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:56
- Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, José Carlos Santos, 12:44
- Isotropic tensor functions, andrea, 12:43
- Re: with sample space., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:41
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium, 12:33
- Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:30
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, quasi, 12:29
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium, 12:19
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:09
- How should mathematical models be produced?, Bryan Bishop, 12:00
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Gottfried Helms, 11:50
- Re: Algorithm advice needed -- Modular Integer GCD, Erik, 11:36
- Re: I'm so confused..., Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 11:32
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:13
- Re: Singular, Torkel Franzen, 10:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 10:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 10:10
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, Ken Quirici, 10:05
- Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, one_time_fool, 10:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 10:03
- Re: with sample space., Rob Johnson, 09:52
- Singular, Dick Barends, 09:49
- I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich, 09:39
- Re: random variables - simple questions, Rob Johnson, 09:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 09:24
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 09:22
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 09:16
- Re: seeking catenoids/helicoids, Roger Bagula, 09:09
- Re: math question from struggling college student, mathedman, 09:09
- Re: difference between suite et série, mathedman, 09:06
- Re: Name for a technique (polynomials and matrices), Randy Poe, 09:04
- Re: with sample space., David C . Ullrich, 08:54
- Re: math question from struggling college student, LC Killingbeck, 08:39
- Re: differentiability of function, David C . Ullrich, 08:28
- Re: Name for a technique (polynomials and matrices), Paul Crowley, 08:26
- Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, abe . buckingham, 07:56
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 07:37
- Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 07:29
- Abelian Unital Magma, tontoko, 07:27
- Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, one_time_fool, 07:20
- Re: An observation and question about orthogonality, José Carlos Santos, 07:03
- Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, José Carlos Santos, 06:51
- Re: random variables - simple questions, Randy Poe, 06:51
- Re: random variables - simple questions, Andrea Vedaldi, 06:46
- trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, one_time_fool, 06:30
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 06:22
- Re: math question from struggling college student, David Ames, 06:01
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 05:55
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 05:20
- An observation and question about orthogonality, psychoblade55, 05:01
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 04:55
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium, 04:43
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Gottfried Helms, 04:37
- Re: Are the rationals a subset of the reals?, MoeBlee, 04:16
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium, 04:15
- Re: ONE, MoeBlee, 04:05
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, Ray Koopman, 04:02
- Re: ONE, MoeBlee, 03:59
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium, 03:27
- Re: Are the rationals a subset of the reals?, Proginoskes, 03:11
- Re: math question from struggling college student, Proginoskes, 03:09
- random variables - simple questions, Tobin Fricke, 02:59
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Proginoskes, 02:56
- Re: f', integral of f multiplicative inverses?, Proginoskes, 02:54
- Re: ? something similar to similarity matrices, Robert Israel, 02:54
- Re: number combinations of components, Proginoskes, 02:50
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, Proginoskes, 02:47
- Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), Robert Israel, 02:38
- Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Rob, 02:17
- Re: Opposite of projection, Jules, 02:07
- Re: series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, Robert Israel, 01:50
- Introductory inspiring math books, Bjorn Edstrom, 01:19
- Re: Are the rationals a subset of the reals?, fishfry, 00:46
- Re: series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, Eric Gisse, 00:14
January 14, 2006
- Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Andrea Vedaldi, 23:52
- Re: math question from struggling college student, Fermat, 23:38
- Re: f', integral of f multiplicative inverses?, Robert Israel, 23:21
- Re: differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, Randy Poe, 23:10
- Re: Second derivative test, Ronald Bruck, 22:56
- Re: Are the rationals a subset of the reals?, N. Silver, 22:54
- Re: with cyclic group., William Elliot, 22:51
- Re: Algorithm advice needed -- Modular Integer GCD, Peter L. Montgomery, 22:27
- Re: differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, Narasimham, 22:13
- Re: Second derivative test, Kenneth Bull, 22:05
- Re: Algorithm advice needed -- Modular Integer GCD, William Elliot, 22:05
- Are the rationals a subset of the reals?, Darren, 21:58
- Re: Second derivative test, Kenneth Bull, 21:53
- Algorithm advice needed -- Modular Integer GCD, Erik, 21:37
- Re: differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, The World Wide Wade, 21:32
- Re: Second derivative test, The World Wide Wade, 21:27
- Re: differentiability of function, The World Wide Wade, 21:19
- Re: series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, Ronald Bruck, 20:57
- Re: Second derivative test, Ronald Bruck, 20:53
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 20:32
- Re: with sample space., mina_world, 20:24
- Re: math question from struggling college student, LC Killingbeck, 20:24
- math question from struggling college student, mel, 20:07
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 20:01
- complex integral, tanabai, 19:52
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 19:49
- Re: question in spivak's calculus on manifolds, smn, 19:36
- Re: Second derivative test, sengal . kiru, 19:31
- Re: differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, Rob Johnson, 19:31
- Re: differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, smn, 19:26
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 19:26
- Simple components and great results, Roman B. Binder, 19:24
- Re: question in spivak's calculus on manifolds, Someonekicked, 19:13
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 19:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:05
- Re: Newbie plane geometry question., bill, 18:55
- Re: The Mystery of Numerical Consciousness, mikeh106@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:50
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, abe . buckingham, 18:49
- Re: signed measures, total variation, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx, 18:49
- Re: signed measures, total variation, smn, 18:43
- differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, i . love . jeevitha, 18:42
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, sengal . kiru, 18:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:28
- Re: series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, donald girod, 18:13
- signed measures, total variation, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx, 18:03
- Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, bill, 17:59
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, bijan, 17:42
- JOHN R RAMSDEN, I didn´t know how to contact you again!, Jolie, 17:30
- Re: x^x = 1/4, bill, 17:24
- Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, Jolie, 17:15
- Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, Jolie, 17:14
- Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, The World Wide Wade, 17:10
- Re: derivative of sqrt(x), The World Wide Wade, 17:03
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Robert Sheskey, 17:01
- Re: question in spivak's calculus on manifolds, The World Wide Wade, 16:48
- Re: The Mystery of Numerical Consciousness, Beelidge, 16:36
- Re: Second derivative test, Kobu, 16:33
- Re: Second derivative test, The World Wide Wade, 16:08
- Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 15:57
- Re: question in spivak's calculus on manifolds, smn, 15:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:50
- Re: prove the inequation, Thomas Mautsch, 15:47
- seeking catenoids/helicoids, Sean McIlroy, 15:39
- Re: number combinations of components, Abstract Dissonance, 15:30
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, fernando revilla, 15:26
- Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), W, 15:12
- Re: Name for a technique (polynomials and matrices), [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 15:09
- Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, heich1, 14:57
- Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, john_ramsden, 14:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee, 14:46
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, michaeld, 14:44
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:43
- Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Narasimham, 14:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 14:37
- Re: Second derivative test, CB4ever, 14:34
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 14:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 14:25
- Re: ONE, MoeBlee, 14:24
- The crucial test, hagen, 14:18
- Re: ONE, MoeBlee, 14:18
- The crucial test, hagen, 14:17
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 14:12
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 14:05
- NOW save on meds you need!, "Dannie Darden", 14:04
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 14:03
- save up to 70% on the meds you need!, "Tyson Saunders", 14:02
- Re: Second derivative test, Kenneth Bull, 13:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 13:56
- Re: ? spectral decomp form other than V*D*V', Cheng Cosine, 13:52
- Re: Second derivative test, CB4ever, 13:46
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 13:29
- Re: difference between continuation et série, Jean-Pierre MERX, 12:50
- question in spivak's calculus on manifolds, Someonekicked, 12:49
- Re: difference between continuation et série, Jean-Pierre MERX, 12:47
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 12:46
- Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, Rob Johnson, 12:42
- Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Dave Rusin, 12:22
- Re: with sample space., Rob Johnson, 12:21
- difference between continuation et série, guillaume07, 12:03
- difference between suite et série, guillaume07, 12:02
- Re: derivative of sqrt(x), deniz . bahar, 11:51
- The Mystery of Numerical Consciousness, mikeh106@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:35
- with sample space., mina_world, 11:29
- Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, paps, 11:19
- Re: Help me again!, Derek Holt, 11:17
- I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, jolina, 11:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:49
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 09:52
- Re: discrete math help., Oscar Lanzi III, 09:45
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 09:44
- Re: need recursive function of Peano curve, paulgfx, 09:34
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 09:09
- Re: ONE, conradeaton, 09:00
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 08:55
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 08:47
- Re: derivative of sqrt(x), Stephen J. Herschkorn, 08:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 08:25
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 08:06
- Re: derivative of sqrt(x), The Qurqirish Dragon, 07:57
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 07:50
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, steve_mccrone, 07:31
- Name for a technique (polynomials and matrices), ciphergoth, 05:50
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 04:51
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 04:47
- Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Andrea Vedaldi, 04:29
- Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Andrea Vedaldi, 04:12
- Re: series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, h . tracy, 04:11
- Re: Q function, john, 04:02
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, Proginoskes, 03:57
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, Ray Koopman, 03:42
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes, 03:39
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes, 03:25
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes, 03:24
- Re: derivative of sqrt(x), Narcoleptic Insomniac, 03:22
- Re: discrete math help., Rob Johnson, 03:21
- Re: Second derivative test, Ronald Bruck, 03:12
- Re: Second derivative test, Ronald Bruck, 03:08
- Re: Second derivative test, Ronald Bruck, 03:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 03:02
- Re: derivative of sqrt(x), Ronald Bruck, 03:00
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Ronald Bruck, 02:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 02:45
- Re: derivative of sqrt(x), José Carlos Santos, 02:33
- Re: Second derivative test, The World Wide Wade, 02:09
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, apoorv, 01:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, apoorv, 01:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, apoorv, 01:35
- Re: Opposite of projection, Narasimham, 01:35
- Re: derivative of sqrt(x), Maulana Gott, 01:09
- Re: Newbie plane geometry question., astutesolutions, 00:58
- Re: Newbie plane geometry question., astutesolutions, 00:49
- Opposite of projection, Enila Nero, 00:33
- Re: Newbie plane geometry question., Randy Poe, 00:24
January 13, 2006
- Re: Newbie plane geometry question., astutesolutions, 23:52
- derivative of sqrt(x), deniz . bahar, 23:52
- derivative of sqrt(x), deniz . bahar, 23:51
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, martin cohen, 22:35
- Re: Quadratic Probing!!! I have a problem, namtrum, 21:21
- Re: Second derivative test, Kenneth Bull, 21:19
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, Kenneth Bull, 21:17
- Re: Second derivative test, CB4ever, 21:15
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, steve_mccrone, 21:12
- Second derivative test, Kenneth Bull, 21:04
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 21:00
- Re: euler characteristic of a surface presentation, Jonas, 20:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:43
- Re: A minor theorem I didn't see in Euclid, Minus XVII, 19:35
- Re: Angle of Rise and Decline., Russell, 19:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:19
- Re: Angle of Rise and Decline., jeuro, 19:17
- Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), Dr Tim, 19:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 19:12
- ? something similar to similarity matrices, Cheng Cosine, 19:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 19:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 18:56
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 18:56
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Virgil, 18:47
- Q function, Yoong Ping Lim, 18:27
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, steve_mccrone, 18:26
- Re: Angle of Rise and Decline., Russell, 18:22
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Minus XVII, 18:17
- Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Minus XVII, 18:15
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 18:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, zuhair, 17:58
- Re: need recursive function of Peano curve, Ioannis, 17:48
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:45
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:37
- Re: Sum of truncated normal variables, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 17:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:33
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, Dave Rusin, 17:24
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Bryce Utting, 17:11
- need recursive function of Peano curve, paulgfx, 17:10
- Re: discrete math help., cd_panic, 17:08
- Re: Angle of Rise and Decline., jeuro, 17:00
- Re: discrete math help., Frank Ferrese, 16:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 16:53
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel, 16:49
- Re: Newbie plane geometry question., Randy Poe, 16:46
- Re: Angle of Rise and Decline., Russell, 16:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 16:38
- Re: discrete math help., cd_panic, 16:38
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 16:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 16:36
- Re: discrete math help., Frank Ferrese, 16:29
- Re: discrete math help., Russell, 16:25
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Adam Funk, 16:23
- Re: discrete math help., Rob Johnson, 16:21
- Re: Why open interval conditions?, Luke Wu, 16:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:14
- Re: asians, Narasimham, 16:09
- Angle of Rise and Decline., jeuro, 16:08
- Re: x^x = 1/4, bill, 16:03
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 16:00
- Re: discrete math help., briggs, 15:58
- Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Narasimham, 15:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 15:57
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 15:55
- Re: Generate a sparse symmetric positive-definite matrix, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 15:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:45
- Re: discrete math help., frank . ferrese, 15:45
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Ken Quirici, 15:41
- Degr3e Program Underway, "Nona Stubbs", 15:35
- Re: ONE, David R Tribble, 15:16
- Re: discrete math help., Russell, 15:12
- Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), W, 15:12
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 15:06
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium, 15:02
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 14:59
- Re: help with algebra/exponentials please!, surferdude303, 14:59
- Re: help with algebra/exponentials please!, surferdude303, 14:43
- discrete math help., cd_panic, 14:41
- Re: Newbie plane geometry question., astutesolutions, 14:33
- Re: help with algebra/exponentials please!, A N Niel, 14:23
- Re: help with algebra/exponentials please!, Jim Black, 14:23
- Re: Matrices, William McWorter, 14:21
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:16
- Re: help with algebra/exponentials please!, Russell, 14:15
- Re: Newbie plane geometry question., Randy Poe, 14:13
- Re: Sampling Without Replacement, Chip Eastham, 14:09
- Newbie plane geometry question., astutesolutions, 14:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe, 14:00
- Re: Sampling Without Replacement, Jim Dars, 13:59
- help with algebra/exponentials please!, surferdude303, 13:56
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:48
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 13:43
- Re: LSC, David C. Ullrich, 13:39
- infimum of the spectrum, tanabai, 13:37
- Re: infinite series~, quasi, 13:33
- Re: Why open interval conditions?, David C. Ullrich, 13:32
- Re: series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, David C. Ullrich, 13:29
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 13:22
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 13:10
- Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Richard Miller, 12:56
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 12:54
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 12:52
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Tony Orlow, 12:45
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, LC Killingbeck, 12:44
- Re: Arzela-Ascoli historical, ArtflDodgr, 12:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 12:33
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Robert Sheskey, 12:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:27
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 12:25
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 12:22
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 12:19
- Sum of truncated normal variables, Hicham Daher, 12:15
- Re: LSC, RamT, 12:01
- Re: [pun] 3n+1 problem, Gottfried Helms, 12:00
- Re: Quadratic Probing!!! I have a problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:57
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, Michael Orion, 11:55
- Help needed with fractals!!!, SagarC., 11:48
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:48
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Kevin S . Wilson, 11:11
- Continuously parameterized fractal dimension. Was Re: help needed!!!!!!!!, Randy Poe, 11:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 11:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:00
- series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, donald girod, 10:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:54
- Re: Dynamic Infinite sets, Randy Poe, 10:42
- Efficient gcd-tuple construction?, Oswald Kluge, 10:42
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:25
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:19
- Re: [pun] 3n+1 problem, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
- Re: Why open interval conditions?, Luke Wu, 09:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:30
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 09:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 09:13
- help needed!!!!!!!!, SagarC., 09:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:00
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Rich Holmes, 08:59
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 08:54
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 08:50
- Re: Quadratic Probing!!! I have a problem, namtrum, 08:47
- Quadratic Probing!!! I have a problem, namtrum, 08:40
- Re: with cyclic group., Werner Nickel, 08:28
- Re: prove the inequation, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx, 08:26
- Arzela-Ascoli historical, G. A. Edgar, 08:17
- Re: Measure Theory, Naebad, 07:48
- Re: differentiability of function, David C . Ullrich, 07:45
- Re: LSC, David C . Ullrich, 07:25
- missing data estimation in matrix, Tobias Wagner, 07:15
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, Paul Elwood, 07:03
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, Paul Elwood, 07:02
- Re: Call For Papers: June 26-29, 2006, joint conferences in computer science, computer engineering & applied computing; USA, Pubkeybreaker, 07:01
- Re: with cyclic group., William Elliot, 06:57
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Christian Bau, 04:55
- Call For Papers: June 26-29, 2006, joint conferences in computer science, computer engineering & applied computing; USA, A. M. G. Solo, 04:44
- differentiability of function, Karel, 04:32
- Re: with cyclic group., , 04:30
- Re: with cyclic group., Jim Heckman, 04:25
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium, 04:21
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium, 04:09
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:06
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium, 04:01
- prove the inequation, donkey, 03:55
- basics, Matematyk, 03:46
- prolog, Matematyk, 03:40
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low, 03:28
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low, 03:27
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:18
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 03:08
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Proginoskes, 03:06
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Proginoskes, 03:02
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes, 03:00
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes, 02:49
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes, 02:48
- Re: number combinations of components, Proginoskes, 02:42
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 02:30
- Re: infinite numbers, Proginoskes, 02:23
- Re: prove that in the process of gauss Jordan elimination, the row space of a matrix does not change, Proginoskes, 02:18
- f', integral of f multiplicative inverses?, Proginoskes, 02:13
- Re: Calculus can tell us whether Big-Bang or Atom Totality is true Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanati, a_plutonium, 02:10
- Re: Chord is the geometric explanation for why derivative inverse to integral Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, Proginoskes, 02:05
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, Proginoskes, 01:59
- Calculus can tell us whether Big-Bang or Atom Totality is true Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanati, a_plutonium, 01:59
- Re: Measure Theory, smn, 01:48
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 01:39
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 01:32
- Re: what is this number?, conradeaton, 01:12
- Re: [pun] 3n+1 problem, Joseph Hertzlinger, 01:11
- Re: using limits of f '(x) to show that f(x) has vertical tangents, Robert Israel, 00:59
- Re: Why open interval conditions?, The World Wide Wade, 00:27
- using limits of f '(x) to show that f(x) has vertical tangents, CB4ever, 00:14
- with cyclic group., mina_world, 00:11
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 00:03
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Chip Eastham, 00:02
January 12, 2006
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Kobu, 23:58
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 23:56
- Re: request an example, The World Wide Wade, 23:45
- Why open interval conditions?, Luke Wu, 23:41
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Eric Bohlman, 23:35
- Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Luke Wu, 23:34
- Re: Matrices, Paul Sperry, 23:29
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, man_in_black529, 23:28
- Measure Theory, Naebad, 23:08
- Re: a subset in X A is dense iff X intersection A is not empty, W. Dale Hall, 22:58
- Re: request an example, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:50
- Re: CHINESE CARS MAY HIT US MARKET BY 2007, Maulana Gott, 22:45
- request an example, sunnewton, 22:44
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Ronald Bruck, 22:16
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 22:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 21:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 21:40
- Re: Sampling Without Replacement, JoeS, 21:38
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 21:30
- Re: what is this number?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:29
- Re: what is this number?, Bob, 21:28
- what is this number?, conradeaton, 21:15
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 21:09
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, The World Wide Wade, 20:55
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, Ray Koopman, 20:53
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, Dave Rusin, 20:31
- Re: infinite series~, mina_world, 20:25
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, steve_mccrone, 20:21
- Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Minus XVII, 20:17
- Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Dave Rusin, 20:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 20:01
- Re: matrices, Robert, 20:01
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, Ray Koopman, 19:49
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker, 19:46
- Re: Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, ACDOC, 19:35
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker, 19:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:26
- Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Herb Martin, 19:18
- Re: CHINESE CARS MAY HIT US MARKET BY 2007, God's Creator!, 19:16
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, steve_mccrone, 19:14
- Re: Is this a valid argument?, Robert Israel, 19:11
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 19:09
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 19:08
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 19:05
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Ronald Bruck, 18:39
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, Ray Koopman, 18:30
- Re: nonlinear nonhomogeneous ODE of second order and second degree, john_ramsden, 18:28
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 18:25
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low, 18:24
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, David Moran, 18:22
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 18:21
- Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, LC Killingbeck, 18:20
- Re: Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:18
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 18:17
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 18:16
- Arithmetic Approximations of the Perimeter of an Ellipse, David W . Cantrell, 18:03
- Re: Maxima of Functions in Spherical Harmonic Representation, David Park, 17:56
- Dot product 3-dimensions, steve_mccrone, 17:44
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker, 17:37
- Re: a subset in X A is dense iff X intersection A is not empty, John Smith, 17:23
- "Toplogical" saddle point, Andrea Vedaldi, 17:23
- Re: Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, ACDOC, 17:10
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low, 17:08
- Matrices, Robert, 17:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:39
- Re: Sampling Without Replacement, JoeS, 16:38
- Re: LSC, smn, 16:37
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Pubkeybreaker, 16:31
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 16:13
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 16:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:07
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 16:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, zuhair, 16:01
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, David DeLaney, 16:00
- I have some very attractive Quant jobs open to 180K in NYC, The job lady, 15:53
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:53
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:44
- Re: infinite series~, quasi, 15:42
- Mersenne primes,triangle numbers and even perfect numbers., Dan, 15:39
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:33
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:33
- Re: CHINESE CARS MAY HIT US MARKET BY 2007, Maulana Gott, 15:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:27
- Re: trig. formula Question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:26
- CHINESE CARS MAY HIT US MARKET BY 2007, God's Creator!, 15:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:18
- Re: Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:02
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Hero, 14:59
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 14:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:56
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Amanda, 14:53
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn, 14:50
- Re: number combinations of components, Abstract Dissonance, 14:37
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Herman Rubin, 14:34
- Re: a subset in X A is dense iff X intersection A is not empty, John Smith, 14:24
- LSC, RamT, 14:13
- Re: The Exchange Paradox, Domenico Rosa, 14:11
- Re: Derivative formulas, Dave L. Renfro, 14:10
- Re: Derivative formulas, Maulana Gott, 14:09
- Re: Derivative formulas, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:00
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Chris McGonnell, 13:57
- Re: Derivative formulas, Robert Low, 13:55
- Re: Derivative formulas, Maulana Gott, 13:48
- Re: Derivative formulas, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:46
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 13:39
- Re: Derivative formulas, Maulana Gott, 13:39
- Re: Derivative formulas, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:39
- Re: matrices, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:34
- Re: Algorithms for continued fractions of reals and rationals, and for GCD, Christopher J. Henrich, 13:32
- Derivative formulas, InvalidUser4444, 13:30
- Re: ONE, Tony Orlow, 13:24
- Re: Expected value, Rob Johnson, 13:22
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Keith A. Lewis, 13:10
- Re: locating a mobile phone in an area, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:39
- Re: number combinations of components, Keith A. Lewis, 12:37
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 12:32
- matrices, Robert, 12:31
- Re: Expected value, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:23
- Re: infinite numbers, Michael Orion, 12:16
- Re: McNemar's hypothesis test, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:14
- Re: Is this a valid argument?, junoexpress, 12:12
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 12:12
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 12:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 12:07
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Amanda, 12:02
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 11:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:53
- Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation, Gordon, 11:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:47
- Re: Pythagorean theorem, José Carlos Santos, 11:45
- Pythagorean theorem, haoc, 11:35
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Kevin S . Wilson, 11:32
- mathematical model for standing waves in ice, rich_clayton03, 11:31
- Re: infinite series~, José Carlos Santos, 11:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, zuhair, 11:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:02
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Otto Bahn, 10:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:56
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low, 10:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:55
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 10:55
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Otto Bahn, 10:54
- Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, cptbanjo, 10:50
- Re: infinite series~, mina_world, 10:49
- Re: locating a mobile phone in an area, Maulana Polycep, 10:47
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker, 10:43
- Re: problem in real analysis, E. Ferrari, 10:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 10:30
- locating a mobile phone in an area, kritheka84@xxxxxxxxx, 10:24
- Re: problem in real analysis, Duncan Muirhead, 10:19
- Re: infinite numbers, mathedman, 09:58
- Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanati, Martin Wanvik, 09:54
- Re: problem in real analysis, José Carlos Santos, 09:40
- Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Richard Tobin, 09:30
- standard deviation units change, S.L.Belso, 09:11
- Re: Generate a sparse symmetric positive-definite matrix, Duncan Muirhead, 09:02
- McNemar's hypothesis test, K., 08:45
- Re: number combinations of components, Abstract Dissonance, 08:38
- problem in real analysis, E. Ferrari, 08:33
- Re: infinite series~, quasi, 08:28
- [pun] 3n+1 problem, Hauke Reddmann, 08:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, briggs, 07:58
- Re: prove that in the process of gauss Jordan elimination, the row space of a matrix does not change, abe . buckingham, 07:52
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low, 07:46
- Re: infinite numbers, David C . Ullrich, 07:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 07:31
- Re: infinite numbers, Larry Lard, 07:22
- Latest caption picture, JohnS, 07:19
- infinite numbers, Grant Johnson, 07:13
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 07:12
- Re: Non-Archimedean Field Valuation Property, Hagen, 06:48
- Generate a sparse symmetric positive-definite matrix, newbix, 06:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:26
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:21
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn, 06:19
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker, 06:08
- infinite series~, mina_world, 05:54
- prove that in the process of gauss Jordan elimination, the row space of a matrix does not change, RemiBernal, 05:49
- Algorithms for continued fractions of reals and rationals, and for GCD, Gabriel Maybrun, 05:29
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Robert J. Kolker, 05:19
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 05:17
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low, 05:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 05:16
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 05:15
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Torkel Franzen, 05:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 04:32
- Re: group structure, , 04:24
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, barbara, 04:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, zuhair, 04:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, zuhair, 04:02
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Adam Funk, 04:01
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 03:59
- Re: Maxima of Functions in Spherical Harmonic Representation, Mario, 03:50
- Re: Expected value, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 03:37
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, TimC, 03:33
- revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium, 03:27
- Chord is the geometric explanation for why derivative inverse to integral Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, a_plutonium, 03:09
- Re: Is this a valid argument?, Robert Israel, 03:08
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Proginoskes, 02:06
- Re: number combinations of components, Proginoskes, 01:56
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Bryce Utting, 01:56
- Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Fermat, 01:52
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Proginoskes, 01:40
- Re: group structure, Paul Sperry, 01:12
- CFP: The International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2006, imecs__2006, 00:38
- Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Dave (from the UK), 00:31
- Is this a valid argument?, junoexpress, 00:18
January 11, 2006
- Re: Sampling Without Replacement, Jim Dars, 23:44
- Re: trig. formula Question, Keith F. Lynch, 23:23
- Re: Sampling Without Replacement, Dave Rusin, 23:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, imaginatorium, 23:02
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 22:53
- Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Minus XVII, 22:53
- Re: Need help with infinite series, sudhanva, 22:50
- Re: Number sequence problems, sudhanva, 22:46
- Re: A minor theorem I didn't see in Euclid, Minus XVII, 22:33
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter, 22:18
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Minus XVII, 21:59
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker, 21:56
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 21:56
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker, 21:50
- Re: Non-Archimedean Field Valuation Property, lataianu bogdan, 21:45
- Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, richard . blankman, 21:42
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 21:40
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, michaeld, 21:33
- Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Stephen Merriman, 21:28
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, John Larkin, 21:25
- Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Minus XVII, 21:22
- Re: Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, ACDOC, 21:04
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, michaeld, 20:39
- Re: Sampling Without Replacement, JoeS, 20:04
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 20:01
- Re: Sampling Without Replacement, JoeS, 19:59
- Re: Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:29
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 19:25
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:21
- Re: trig. formula Question, majamin, 19:19
- sample size vs. Principal Components Analysis (PCA), Roy, 19:18
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker, 19:15
- Re: trig. formula Question, Rob Johnson, 19:13
- Re: a subset in X A is dense iff X intersection A is not empty, W. Dale Hall, 19:13
- Re: trig. formula Question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, The World Wide Wade, 18:46
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble, 18:42
- Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:20
- Re: trig. formula Question, Dave Seaman, 18:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 18:17
- a subset in X A is dense iff X intersection A is not empty, John Smith, 18:13
- Re: Maxima of Functions in Spherical Harmonic Representation, David Park, 17:54
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 17:53
- trig. formula Question, incon, 17:45
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil, 17:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:07
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:05
- Re: Sampling Without Replacement, Jim Dars, 17:03
- Re: Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, Virgil, 16:54
- Re: Expected value, Rob Johnson, 16:53
- Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Robert Israel, 16:42
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 16:32
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 16:20
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 16:18
- The 3n+1 Conjecture, richard . blankman, 16:16
- Re: Non-Archimedean Field Valuation Property, alex . virdol, 16:05
- number combinations of components, Abstract Dissonance, 15:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, zuhair, 15:45
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 15:37
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 15:28
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 15:16
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 15:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:07
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 14:52
- Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology and never gets to the center of truth, fernando revilla, 14:49
- Re: TEST, bill, 14:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Torkel Franzen, 14:41
- Re: ONE, David R Tribble, 14:39
- Re: group structure, fernando revilla, 14:35
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:28
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, The World Wide Wade, 14:20
- Re: Non-Archimedean Field Valuation Property, JoeS, 14:17
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, The World Wide Wade, 14:15
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Spehro Pefhany, 14:09
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:08
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:05
- group structure, Samuel Fenelly, 14:04
- Re: Vector, triangle chaos., jeuro, 14:03
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:54
- Re: Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:36
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 13:32
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Bob Stephens, 13:32
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, John Larkin, 13:10
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Otto Bahn, 13:02
- Non-Archimedean Field Valuation Property, alex . virdol, 12:41
- Re: Integral: help!, steiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:34
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Kevin S . Wilson, 12:30
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Chris McGonnell, 12:21
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Linønut, 12:13
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 12:12
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Jim Thompson, 11:57
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, John Larkin, 11:55
- EC-funded Research Visits: Application Deadline 28/02/2006, europa, 11:34
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Jim Thompson, 11:32
- A possible gap in the proof of The Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory in the Garling's book, ulinnick, 11:28
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, John Larkin, 11:24
- Re: difference between inverse and function Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 11:03
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 11:00
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Otto Bahn, 10:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, fishfry, 10:45
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 10:44
- Re: similar to Darboux's theorem, José Carlos Santos, 10:20
- similar to Darboux's theorem, mina_world, 10:11
- Re: cover and subcover (topology), Arturo Magidin, 09:47
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow, 09:45
- Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation- Wikipedia, Mathworld-, Michael Orion, 09:45
- Re: cover and subcover (topology), Arturo Magidin, 09:44
- | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Amanda, 09:18
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Robert J. Kolker, 09:08
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 09:06
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 09:04
- re: ATTENTION - S.H. Update, "Amber Mcknight", 08:49
- Re: Sampling Without Replacement, quasi, 07:40
- Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation- Wikipedia, Mathworld-, JEMebius, 07:38
- Re: Space filling function?, David C . Ullrich, 07:35
- Re: Q on representations of infinite groups, kj, 07:10
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough, 06:55
- Re: Maxima of Functions in Spherical Harmonic Representation, Mario, 06:47
- Re: Maxima of Functions in Spherical Harmonic Representation, john, 06:25
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 05:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, zuhair, 05:42
- Re: Space filling function?, William Elliot, 05:20
- Re: Getting the feel of localizations and schemes, Jannick Asmus, 05:14
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 05:02
- sums of zeta, graumet, 04:27
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Winfield Hill, 04:25
- Maxima of Functions in Spherical Harmonic Representation, Mario, 04:19
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, TimC, 03:25
- Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0; why Cantor transfinites are phony, Proginoskes, 03:11
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, a_plutonium, 03:07
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Proginoskes, 03:01
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, Virgil, 03:00
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 02:55
- Re: Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, KoenM, 02:55
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Proginoskes, 02:52
- Re: Vector, triangle chaos., Virgil, 02:52
- Re: Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, KoenM, 02:52
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Proginoskes, 02:51
- Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0; why Cantor transfinites are phony, a_plutonium, 02:48
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Proginoskes, 02:47
- Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation- Wikipedia, Mathworld, Virgil, 02:46
- Re: difference between inverse and function Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, Proginoskes, 02:45
- Re: Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, Virgil, 02:40
- Re: difference between inverse and function Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, Proginoskes, 02:39
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, Proginoskes, 02:34
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, Proginoskes, 02:21
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, Proginoskes, 02:05
- Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0; why Cantor transfinites are phony, Proginoskes, 02:03
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel, 01:20
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel, 01:10
- Re: traingulation in mobile networking, Physar Polycep, 01:08
- Re: significance of det of symmetric matrix, Robert Israel, 00:59
- Re: Q on representations of infinite groups, cbrown, 00:58
- Re: Q on representations of infinite groups, Robert Israel, 00:54
- traingulation in mobile networking, kritheka84@xxxxxxxxx, 00:50
- Re: about a set!, MoeBlee, 00:12
- Re: about a set!, fishfry, 00:03
- triangulation, gaya, 00:02
- Re: about a set!, G.E. Ivey, 00:00
January 10, 2006
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, fishfry, 23:57
- Re: New Scientist & AIA Goof on Heim Hyperdrive, Larry Hammick, 23:50
- Re: Expected value, PARASHAR, 23:49
- Re: Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, ACDOC, 23:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 23:46
- Leonard Susskind's Rubber Band Super Megaverse, Jack Sarfatti, 23:39
- Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, Gib Bogle, 23:21
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, a_plutonium, 23:08
- Re: about a set!, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:59
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, John Savard, 22:58
- Re: Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:43
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Keith F. Lynch, 22:38
- Re: significance of det of symmetric matrix, smn, 22:37
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Keith F. Lynch, 22:29
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis, E. E. Escultura, 22:25
- about a set!, sunnewton, 22:25
- Re: Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, ACDOC, 22:14
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 22:10
- Re: Infinity, MoeBlee, 21:55
- Re: x^x = 1/4, bill, 21:52
- significance of det of symmetric matrix, ramakrishnan . kannan, 21:48
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:14
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:10
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, John Larkin, 21:07
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 20:58
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Chip Eastham, 20:52
- Re: Vector, triangle chaos., jeuro, 20:45
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 20:43
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker, 20:40
- Re: How bad is this?, Michael J Hardy, 20:34
- Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, The World Wide Wade, 20:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 20:07
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 20:05
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:03
- Re: ONE, fernando revilla, 19:39
- Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry, 19:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 19:27
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel, 19:14
- Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi, 19:10
- Re: Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, Robert Israel, 19:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 19:04
- Re: difference between inverse and function Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, Dik T. Winter, 19:04
- Re: puzzle question, David Hartley, 19:03
- Re: how to simplify a formula of nabla, markwh04, 18:53
- Re: how to simplify a formula of nabla, markwh04, 18:51
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, TimC, 18:47
- Re: x^x = 1/4, bill, 18:47
- It's not exponential, nor even linear (was: exponential rise of the population), markwh04, 18:46
- Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Dave L. Renfro, 18:27
- Re: Integral: help!, Casey Hawthorne, 18:10
- Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, abe . buckingham, 17:45
- Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:28
- Re: Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, KoenM, 17:23
- Re: Integral: help!, Peter L. Montgomery, 17:21
- Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation, Michael Orion, 17:20
- Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 17:07
- Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation- Wikipedia, Mathworld, JEMebius, 16:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 16:57
- Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, john_ramsden, 16:53
- Re: Distance between 2 points on a globe, Hans van Duijnhoven, 16:51
- Re: cover and subcover (topology), Russell, 16:47
- Re: Distance between 2 points on a globe, Dave Seaman, 16:41
- orthogonal transformation and rotation, Roy, 16:35
- Re: Infinity, David R Tribble, 16:29
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:25
- Re: Infinity, David R Tribble, 16:20
- Re: continued fraction and approximation, Helmut Richter, 16:19
- Space filling function?, Abstract Dissonance, 16:17
- Re: cover and subcover (topology), thomas, 16:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:06
- Re: cover and subcover (topology), Robert Israel, 16:03
- Re: cover and subcover (topology), Robert Israel, 16:00
- Re: cover and subcover (topology), Ronald Bruck, 15:57
- Re: cover and subcover (topology), Russell, 15:57
- Re: Math Finance, Axel Vogt, 15:55
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel, 15:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:53
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel, 15:52
- Re: cover and subcover (topology), Arturo Magidin, 15:51
- Re: Expected value, Herman Rubin, 15:50
- Re: Distance between 2 points on a globe, Physar Polycep, 15:41
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:40
- cover and subcover (topology), thomas, 15:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:24
- Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Robert Israel, 15:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:16
- Distance between 2 points on a globe, draccarlawpet, 15:16
- Re: Infinity, Virgil, 15:10
- Re: x^x = 1/4, bill, 15:10
- Re: Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, Robert Israel, 15:07
- Re: x^x = 1/4, David R Tribble, 15:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:52
- Re: beginner set theory question, Arturo Magidin, 14:49
- Re: puzzle question, Jeff, 14:45
- Re: beginner set theory question, Arturo Magidin, 14:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 14:41
- Re: beginner set theory question, tlicious, 14:37
- Re: continued fraction and approximation, Helmut Richter, 14:35
- Re: Expected value, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:33
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, David R Tribble, 14:21
- Sampling Without Replacement, Jim Dars, 14:16
- Re: beginner set theory question, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:15
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:14
- Re: continued fraction and approximation, John Gabbriel, 14:13
- Re: Maximum possible chess moves, Herman Rubin, 14:12
- Re: beginner set theory question, Arturo Magidin, 14:11
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Mark Edwards, 14:10
- beginner set theory question, tlicious, 14:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:00
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 13:54
- Re: puzzle question, bill, 13:34
- continued fraction and approximation, Onno Garms, 13:33
- Re: Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:32
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:18
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Otto Bahn, 13:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, zuhair, 13:12
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:09
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 13:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 13:01
- Re: nonlinear nonhomogeneous ODE of second order and second degree, Herman Rubin, 13:00
- Re: Infinity, Tony Orlow, 12:59
- Re: exponential rise of the population, Jonie, 12:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, zuhair, 12:56
- Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, barr, 12:55
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:54
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Kevin S . Wilson, 12:46
- Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Dave L. Renfro, 12:39
- Re: Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, Keith A. Lewis, 12:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 12:39
- Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Robert Israel, 12:32
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Chris McGonnell, 12:32
- Re: How bad is this?, Dave L. Renfro, 12:24
- Re: Proof of the Riemann hypothesis, Herman Rubin, 12:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 12:18
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel, 12:15
- Rbtx's Coordinate Transform, R. Brown, 12:08
- Chat With New Friends and girl friends, letsjoy, 12:05
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 12:01
- Re: Expected value, Robert Israel, 11:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:45
- Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 11:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:25
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 11:23
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Kevin S . Wilson, 11:23
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Kevin S . Wilson, 11:22
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Kevin S . Wilson, 11:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:18
- Re: Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, David C . Ullrich, 11:14
- Re: Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, Pubkeybreaker, 11:11
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:08
- Re: Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, Fusar Gramin, 11:05
- Re: difference between inverse and function Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, Ken Quirici, 10:54
- Craps modeled as a Poisson Process, Cat_in_awe, 10:44
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Otto Bahn, 10:42
- Re: Help me again!, Yo Wang, 09:34
- Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, quasi, 09:10
- Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, David C . Ullrich, 09:03
- Re: How bad is this?, quasi, 08:58
- Re: How bad is this?, Someonekicked, 08:57
- Re: Expected value, David C . Ullrich, 08:56
- Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi, 08:46
- Re: How bad is this?, A N Niel, 08:33
- Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, David C . Ullrich, 08:33
- Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, David C . Ullrich, 08:31
- Re: How bad is this?, conesetter, 07:37
- Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, quasi, 06:45
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 04:49
- Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, KoenM, 04:30
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 04:20
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 04:01
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Adam Funk, 03:53
- Re: Expected value, PARASHAR, 03:48
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, a_plutonium, 03:22
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 03:10
- Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0; why Cantor transfinites are phony, a_plutonium, 03:01
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, Proginoskes, 03:00
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, Proginoskes, 02:58
- Re: internal language of a 2 category, No One, 02:57
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 02:55
- Re: difference between inverse and function Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, Proginoskes, 02:45
- Re: Expected value, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 02:41
- why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, ziman137, 02:38
- Re: difference between inverse and function Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, a_plutonium, 02:36
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, Virgil, 02:19
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Proginoskes, 02:14
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Proginoskes, 02:13
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, a_plutonium, 02:11
- Re: Maximum possible chess moves, Proginoskes, 02:04
- Re: Complex analysis questions, Abdulla, 02:00
- Re: Maximum possible chess moves, Proginoskes, 01:53
- Expected value, PARASHAR, 00:56
- Re: How bad is this?, quasi, 00:47
- Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi, 00:18
- Re: How bad is this?, Russell, 00:11
January 09, 2006
- Re: How bad is this?, Russell, 23:59
- Re: How bad is this?, quasi, 23:55
- How bad is this?, Someonekicked, 23:13
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 23:08
- Re: Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I, CB4ever, 22:45
- Re: A minor theorem I didn't see in Euclid, Minus XVII, 22:37
- Re: puzzle question, quasi, 22:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 22:21
- Re: Streamlines of a potential flow?, Robert Israel, 22:19
- Re: exponential rise of the population, Robert Israel, 22:16
- Re: nonlinear nonhomogeneous ODE of second order and second degree, Robert Israel, 22:12
- Re: ?????? TEST, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:57
- Re: Streamlines of a potential flow?, John Schutkeker, 21:39
- Re: puzzle question, bill, 21:38
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:34
- Re: exponential rise of the population, Jonie, 21:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:21
- Re: difference between inverse and function Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 21:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:12
- Re: Help with Permutations, barliow, 20:59
- Re: ? spectral decomp form other than V*D*V', Cheng Cosine, 20:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 20:53
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 20:37
- Re: Mathematician's Obits In The NY Times, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 20:25
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, quasi, 20:23
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 20:17
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Kobu, 20:15
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 20:12
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 20:10
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 20:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 20:01
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, quasi, 19:56
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 19:52
- Weighted Least Squares ( sorry, typo in subject line :-) ), dontspam, 19:42
- Weigthed Least Squares, dontspam, 19:41
- Re: TEST, bill, 19:37
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Kobu, 19:36
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 19:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:25
- Re: please recommend good references for studying stochastic differential equations?, Russell . Martin, 19:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:20
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 19:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:20
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Kobu, 19:19
- Re: Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, Zuurstof, 19:05
- Re: Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, quasi, 18:56
- Re: Proof of the Riemann hypothesis, Minus XVII, 18:55
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, stephen, 18:49
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 18:49
- Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, Zuurstof, 18:48
- Re: A minor theorem I didn't see in Euclid, Minus XVII, 18:44
- nonlinear nonhomogeneous ODE of second order and second degree, roman, 18:33
- nonlinear nonhomogeneous ODE of second order and second degree, roman, 18:33
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, man_in_black529, 18:13
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Michael Orion, 18:12
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 18:01
- Re: ONE, fernando revilla, 17:51
- Re: question about projective space, Rupert, 17:41
- Re: missing solution?, mathman, 17:31
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 17:30
- Re: asians, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 17:24
- Re: Help me again!, Robert Israel, 16:48
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 16:34
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 15:43
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:11
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:09
- Vector, triangle chaos., jeuro, 15:08
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, smn, 14:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:55
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, smn, 14:51
- Re: Tough PDE, Igor Khavkine, 14:51
- Re: TEST, Patrick FitzGerald, 14:46
- Re: exponential rise of the population, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:43
- Re: Help me again!, Igor Khavkine, 14:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:25
- Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, The World Wide Wade, 14:20
- Re: difference between inverse and function Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, a_plutonium, 14:02
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 13:58
- Re: ONE, abe . buckingham, 13:52
- Re: please recommend good references for studying stochastic differential equations?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:46
- Re: exponential rise of the population, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:41
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 13:40
- Re: One, zuhair, 13:39
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, a_plutonium, 13:39
- Re: Open, connected but not path-connected, Nathan, 13:24
- Re: puzzle question, a1jrj@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:07
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 13:06
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:50
- Re: ONE, fernando revilla, 12:37
- Math Finance, droca, 12:28
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 12:22
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:22
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 12:14
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:07
- Re: Moore-Penrose Inverse, Robert Israel, 12:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 12:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:02
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 11:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:55
- Re: missing solution?, Arturo Magidin, 11:55
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, TomH, 11:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 11:38
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel, 11:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 11:11
- A peculiar problem about series, Ed, 11:08
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 11:07
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 11:03
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Otto Bahn, 11:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:59
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 10:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:50
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:46
- Re: ONE, David R Tribble, 10:40
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 10:35
- Re: Open, connected but not path-connected, Daniel Grubb, 10:34
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Michael Orion, 10:34
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Michael Orion, 10:32
- Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, Patt, 10:29
- Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, Patt, 10:28
- Re: Maximum possible chess moves, denis feldmann, 10:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:23
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 10:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:55
- Re: Maximum possible chess moves, Keith A. Lewis, 09:42
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, William Elliot, 09:40
- Re: Euler's Formula, Anon, 09:26
- Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, David C . Ullrich, 09:23
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 09:21
- Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, David C . Ullrich, 09:20
- Re: Modified diffusion equation, Blase, 09:12
- Moore-Penrose Inverse, R. S. Tiberio, 09:02
- Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi, 09:00
- Re: Tough PDE, dkjk, 08:54
- Do you need prime numbers?, Christian Drewing, 08:47
- Re: ?????? TEST, Keith A. Lewis, 08:45
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Ioannis, 08:42
- Re: Maximum possible chess moves, Carlos Moreno, 08:32
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Adam Funk, 08:15
- Re: question about projective space, Timothy Murphy, 08:15
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Adam Funk, 08:13
- Re: Sprint's Phone Card Accounts are probably illegal Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me; or has Qwest broken one law; or neither?, Kevin S . Wilson, 08:06
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 07:40
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 07:28
- Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi, 07:17
- Re: General sudoku: set-theoretic definition, Dik T. Winter, 07:06
- Re: puzzle question, quasi, 06:57
- Re: missing solution, Jonas, 06:55
- Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Jonas, 06:50
- Re: integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, Ken Quirici, 06:10
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 09, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:51
- Re: Help with Permutations, barliow, 05:34
- Re: difference between inverse and function Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 04:41
- Re: Category Theory: representation more general than limit, Marc Olschok, 04:40
- Re: Getting the feel of localizations and schemes, Jose Capco, 04:33
- Re: Getting the feel of localizations and schemes, Jose Capco, 04:30
- Discrete Convolution of n Vectors, cicero, 04:17
- quantum computing/group theory question, rrtucci, 04:09
- quantum computing/group theory question, rrtucci, 04:08
- Re: missing solution, Robert Israel, 04:02
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, smn, 03:59
- Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, smn, 03:57
- Re: exponential rise of the population, Robert Israel, 03:57
- Re: Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I, Jules, 03:48
- Re: Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I, Robert Israel, 03:43
- Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Jules, 03:36
- Re: notation mean?, Jules, 03:32
- notation mean?, sunnewton, 03:31
- Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0; why Cantor transfinites are phony, a_plutonium, 03:26
- Re: Q:About primes?, Chip Eastham, 03:08
- Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, john, 03:03
- Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, MathZhang, 03:02
- integral in 3rd dimension colloborates Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0, a_plutonium, 02:49
- Re: Modified diffusion equation, Blase, 02:41
- Re: devise a math system that every phone number is unique Re: Every science academic person in USA is being spyed upon Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me, Jesse F. Hughes, 02:40
- Re: FAQ, Peter Webb, 02:38
- Please Restore Your Account Access, "service@xxxxxxxxxx", 02:18
- Re: Modified diffusion equation, Blase, 02:13
- Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, MathZhang, 01:38
- Re: asians, Virgil, 01:16
- Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, Virgil, 01:13
- Re: Beth cardinals, Keith Ramsay, 01:02
- euler characteristic of a surface presentation, Bill Taylor, 00:50
- Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, Jules, 00:35
- Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, Randall, 00:21
- Re: Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I, Proginoskes, 00:20
- euler characteristic of a surface presentation, Bill Taylor, 00:20
- Re: dy/dx is d/dx operator applied to y=f(x).. now dy/dx is a ratio... what gives?, Proginoskes, 00:11
- Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, Rouben Rostamian, 00:09
- Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, Alternaria Alternata, 00:07
- Re: asians, Narasimham, 00:03
- algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, m . topczewski, 00:00
January 08, 2006
- Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0; why Cantor transfinites are phony, Proginoskes, 23:59
- Re: new way of teaching the Limit in Calculus; infinity the inverse is 0; why Cantor transfinites are phony, Proginoskes, 23:57
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Keith F. Lynch, 23:54
- Re: asians, Narasimham, 23:49
- Re: how to simplify a formula of nabla, mgao, 23:23
- Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, Patt, 23:17
- Re: missing the point of Proof..., Randy Poe, 23:04
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Naebad, 23:03
- Re: missing the point of Proof..., Randy Poe, 22:34
- Re: missing the point of Proof..., Randy Poe, 22:28
- Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I, CB4ever, 22:28
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 22:22
- missing solution?, zxcv_890, 22:18
- Re: Euler's Formula, Narasimham, 22:10
- Re: missing the point of Proof..., Randy Poe, 22:05
- Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, Patt, 22:02
- Re: proof, William Elliot, 21:57
- Re: missing the point of Proof..., Randy Poe, 21:49
- Re: missing solution?, William Elliot, 21:47
- Re: ONE, abe . buckingham, 21:45
- Re: missing the point of Proof..., Randy Poe, 21:36
- Re: asians, john_ramsden, 21:32
- missing solution, arolotom@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:32
- Windows XP, All Adobe software Just go and get it for 49.95! Win XP, "Geoffrey", 21:29
- Re: missing solution?, quasi, 21:18
- Re: Graph theory problem, bill, 21:17
- We are calling for nomination., "Jim Burroughs", 21:12
- Re: missing solution?, Stephen Merriman, 21:03
- missing solution?, zxcv_890, 20:49
- Re: Mathematician's Obits In The NY Times, Lee Rudolph, 20:09
- Mathematician's Obits In The NY Times, Robert Vienneau, 19:49
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han . deBruijn, 19:48
- Help me again!, Yo Wang, 19:44
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 19:44
- Re: seems like cheating (more inequalities)..., Randy Poe, 19:41
- Re: seems like cheating (more inequalities)..., Randy Poe, 19:40
- Re: Tough PDE, dkjk, 19:40
- Re: f continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b), deniz . bahar, 19:32
- question about projective space, Rupert, 19:29
- Re: missing the point of Proof..., bill, 19:24
- Re: dy/dx is d/dx operator applied to y=f(x).. now dy/dx is a ratio... what gives?, Randy Poe, 19:10
- Re: dy/dx is d/dx operator applied to y=f(x).. now dy/dx is a ratio... what gives?, Randy Poe, 19:08