sci.math (date)
December 31, 2005
- Degree of a map S^1 -> S^1, WassilyDali, 16:21
- What is the 'n' th term in series expansion, Narasimham, 16:18
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 16:14
- Re: GCD(0,0), Marc Olschok, 16:12
- Re: GCD(0,0), Marc Olschok, 16:02
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 16:02
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 15:43
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 15:24
- Re: fermat's last theorem, Gib Bogle, 15:14
- Re: partition of the real line, cbrown, 15:09
- Dunford-Schwartz Linear Operators on E-Bay, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 14:48
- Re: Subgroups, , 14:15
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:12
- Re: difference compact sets, Ed Hook, 14:00
- Re: Subgroups, David C . Ullrich, 13:59
- Re: Simple Topology Question, Jannick Asmus, 13:57
- Re: Simple Topology Question, David C . Ullrich, 13:55
- Re: difference compact sets, barr, 13:52
- Re: number theory, kcenac@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 13:50
- Re: Subgroups, barr, 13:42
- Re: Subgroups, Peter L. Montgomery, 13:40
- Re: Another question about derivatives, SuGuang,Dou, 13:31
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Steven H. Cullinane, 13:28
- Re: integer solutions of z^2=y^4+y+2, JoeS, 13:23
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 13:23
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 03:08
- Re: GCD(0,0), Rufus . Zee, 02:16
- Fermi Problem of the Day # 3, 12-31-2005, Michael Varney, 02:11
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 02:01
- Re: Complex analysis questions, Jonathan Hoyle, 01:48
- Re: Complex analysis questions, David Ames, 01:41
- Re: Uniform Dirichlet distribution for 3 dimensions, Rufus . Zee, 01:36
December 30, 2005
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 23:47
- Re: Lebesgue measure zero, Rufus . Zee, 23:45
- Re: Invalidity of General Theory of Relativity, brian a m stuckless, 21:34
- Re: think in sets, Gary Weselle, 21:34
- an easy question about barycentric subdivisions according to my book, John Smith, 21:15
- Re: GCD(0,0), quasi, 20:16
- Re: Shadow of Rim in Bowl, Narasimham, 20:09
- Re: Are Polynomials really C ^Infinity (Smooth) Differentiable, Lee Rudolph, 20:03
- Are Polynomials really C ^Infinity (Smooth) Differentiable, Terry Padden, 19:43
- Re: Uniform Dirichlet distribution for 3 dimensions, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 19:33
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, Der alte Hexenmeister, 19:13
- Uniform Dirichlet distribution for 3 dimensions, Ken Williams, 18:23
- Re: GCD(0,0), Peter L. Montgomery, 18:17
- Re: number theory, quasi, 18:16
- Re: Integral containing product of Bessel functions, Robert Israel, 18:07
- Re: number theory, Dr Tim, 18:05
- tax discount, zxcv_890, 17:35
- Re: x^2-1 = 0 mod p^k, JoeS, 17:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 17:30
- Re: number theory, Big Z, 17:29
- Re: think in sets, Gary Weselle, 17:25
- Re: Shadow of Rim in Bowl, Robert Israel, 17:21
- Re: GCD(0,0), quasi, 17:16
- Re: GCD(0,0), Marc Olschok, 17:12
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, PD, 17:08
- Re: number theory, kcenac@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:05
- Re: Representation of analytic functions, Rufus . Zee, 17:00
- Re: Total quotient rings, seldnplan, 16:58
- Re: lottery, sensitive dependence, quasi, 16:49
- Re: Integral containing product of Bessel functions, Andy, 16:28
- Re: x^2-1 = 0 mod p^k, Stephen Merriman, 15:56
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, Der alte Hexenmeister, 15:55
- Re: here comes probability problem again, Carlos Moreno, 15:12
- Re: Absolute continuity, another question,, Rufus . Zee, 15:12
- Graphing of Time, R. Brown, 14:37
- number theory, kcenac@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:19
- any bit in a binary sum - general formula ?, rolland, 13:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 12:44
- Re: Multiplicativity of the (homotopy) degree, Rufus . Zee, 12:33
- Re: Egyptian arithmetic and its remaidners, Dave Rusin, 11:59
- Re: Absolute continuity, another question,, Rufus . Zee, 11:52
- Re: cant solve this problem..., vsingh, 11:27
- Re: Question on Pi, John Bailey, 11:16
- Re: Simple Topology Question, Rufus . Zee, 10:57
- Re: are mathematicians more productive during the winter?, jafische, 10:56
- Re: cant solve this problem..., N. Silver, 10:53
- Re: Hausdorff, not-first countable space where sequential closure = closure?, Rufus . Zee, 10:44
- Re: integer solutions of z^2=y^4+y+2, JoeS, 10:43
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, PD, 10:42
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han . deBruijn, 10:18
- Re: Hausdorff, not-first countable space where sequential closure = closure?, William Elliot, 09:30
- Re: Hausdorff, not-first countable space where sequential closure = closure?, William Elliot, 09:28
- Re: GCD(0,0), Rob Johnson, 09:16
- Re: fermat's last theorem, Gottfried Helms, 09:14
- Re: ONE, abe . buckingham, 07:49
- Re: difference compact sets, Jannick Asmus, 07:13
- Total quotient rings, seldnplan, 07:08
- Re: GCD(0,0), David C . Ullrich, 06:51
- Re: Hausdorff, not-first countable space where sequential closure = closure?, David C . Ullrich, 06:36
- Re: Hausdorff, not-first countable space where sequential closure = closure?, Rufus . Zee, 06:18
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, The Ghost In The Machine, 06:00
- Re: fermat's last theorem, Fermat, 05:59
- Re: fermat's last theorem, Richard Miller, 05:26
- Simple Topology Question, MimsyBoro, 05:16
- Re: Hausdorff, not-first countable space where sequential closure = closure?, William Elliot, 04:42
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, Autymn D. C., 04:26
- Re: GCD(0,0), Proginoskes, 04:13
- Re: are mathematicians more productive during the winter?, Proginoskes, 04:07
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, Proginoskes, 03:36
- Re: the axioms of Eucl geom has addition and 0,1, and infinity Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, Proginoskes, 03:25
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 03:24
- Residues of powers (mod p) / Euler-Theorem /Mersenne-Primes, Gottfried Helms, 03:08
- Re: the axioms of Eucl geom has addition and 0,1, and infinity Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, a_plutonium, 03:07
- Re: Simple Group Theory Questions, animea, 03:01
- Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology and never gets to the center of truth, Proginoskes, 03:00
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 02:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:29
- Re: Simple Group Theory Questions, Abdulla, 02:14
- Re: fermat's last theorem, Fermat, 02:12
- Re: Complex analysis questions, Abdulla, 02:05
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 01:55
- Shadow of Rim in Bowl, Narasimham, 00:55
- Re: Multiplicativity of the (homotopy) degree, Larry Hammick, 00:48
- Re: Multiplicativity of the (homotopy) degree, Larry Hammick, 00:47
- Re: are mathematicians more productive during the winter?, magic math tricks, 00:46
- Re: are mathematicians more productive during the winter?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 00:22
- Re: here comes probability problem again, me, 00:17
- Re: Prime sequences, Andrew Usher, 00:11
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, Autymn D. C., 00:00
December 29, 2005
- are mathematicians more productive during the winter?, magic math tricks, 23:59
- Re: how to change name of song in Itunes, a_plutonium, 23:45
- Re: fermat's last theorem, quasi, 23:17
- Re: GCD(0,0), john_ramsden, 21:04
- Re: GCD(0,0), john_ramsden, 20:59
- Re: GCD(0,0), quasi, 20:58
- Re: GCD(0,0), Rufus . Zee, 20:44
- Job: Chief Methodologist, Vincent Granville, 20:26
- Re: GCD(0,0), quasi, 20:25
- Re: GCD(0,0), Herman Rubin, 19:59
- Re: Integral with exp and sqrt, Raymond Manzoni, 19:41
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, onehappymadman, 19:39
- Re: a simplified Liar's Poker type game, quasi, 19:32
- Re: Dynamic Infinite sets, fishfry, 19:31
- Re: help with diophantine equation, quasi, 19:23
- Re: GCD(0,0), Carlos Moreno, 19:19
- Re: here comes probability problem again, me, 19:08
- Re: help with diophantine equation, Jpr2718, 19:07
- Re: here comes probability problem again, Carlos Moreno, 19:04
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, The Ghost In The Machine, 19:00
- Re: ONE, abe . buckingham, 18:59
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 18:44
- Re: The Truth, David R Tribble, 18:41
- Re: periodic cycle, quasi, 18:13
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 18:03
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 17:41
- suboptimal shortest hamiltonain path, Fernando Cacciola, 17:35
- Re: GCD(0,0), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 17:23
- Re: GCD(0,0), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:20
- Re: help with diophantine equation, john_ramsden, 17:12
- Re: which later courses is the "Linear Algebra" course usally required as a prereq?, smn, 17:02
- Re: GCD(0,0), JoeS, 16:46
- Re: Prime sequences, quasi, 16:45
- Re: periodic cycle, quasi, 16:27
- Re: Absolutely continuous question, L^2, The World Wide Wade, 16:23
- Re: Absolutely continuous question, L^2, The World Wide Wade, 16:23
- Re: which later courses is the "Linear Algebra" course usally required as a prereq?, me, 16:23
- Re: help with diophantine equation, Keith A. Lewis, 16:22
- Re: Question on Pi, andre.maier@xxxxxxx, 16:22
- My question on Learning Bayesian Statistics and Biostatistics, me, 16:16
- Re: Prime sequences, Paul Pollack, 16:15
- Re: Question on Pi, David W . Cantrell, 16:13
- Re: x^2-1 = 0 mod p^k, JoeS, 16:12
- Re: NSA Transfer and Smallest Infinite Ordinal, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:06
- Re: which later courses is the "Linear Algebra" course usally required as a prereq?, inquirydog, 16:05
- Re: Question on Pi, Raymond Manzoni, 16:02
- Re: Exponential equation, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 16:02
- Re: a simplified Liar's Poker type game, Keith A. Lewis, 15:56
- Re: here comes probability problem again, me, 15:48
- Re: GCD(0,0), Rob Johnson, 15:46
- Re: Question on Pi, David W . Cantrell, 15:43
- Re: Exponential equation, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:40
- Coprime triangles' row-sums, Leroy Quet, 15:39
- Thanks Re: which later courses is the "Linear Algebra" course usally required as a prereq?, me, 15:36
- Even/Odd Adding Up Game, Leroy Quet, 15:31
- GCD(0,0), Leroy Quet, 15:30
- Re: which later courses is the "Linear Algebra" course usally required as a prereq?, David Moran, 15:28
- Exponential equation, Ron J, 15:18
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 15:18
- Re: periodic cycle, damage, 15:16
- NSA Transfer and Smallest Infinite Ordinal, Math1723, 15:14
- which later courses is the "Linear Algebra" course usally required as a prereq?, me, 15:09
- the axioms of Eucl geom has addition and 0,1, and infinity Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology, a_plutonium, 15:01
- Re: Need knowledgable people concerning relatively theory... John Baez...?, R. Brown, 14:53
- Re: Integer partitions into kth powers question., Keith A. Lewis, 14:49
- x^2-1 = 0 mod p^k, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx, 14:46
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:36
- help with diophantine equation, candrakamin, 14:34
- Re: The Truth, I.N. Galidakis, 14:32
- Re: Question on Pi, Robert J. Kolker, 14:29
- Question on Pi, andre . maier, 14:22
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., David C. Ullrich, 14:22
- Re: Absolutely continuous question, L^2, David C. Ullrich, 14:19
- i have problem with "probability of undetected error" equation, steph, 14:14
- Re: Linear algebra, quasi, 14:14
- Re: periodic cycle, quasi, 14:09
- Re: Linear algebra, El Blusero, 13:54
- Re: here comes probability problem again, me, 13:52
- Absolutely continuous question, L^2, James, 13:49
- Ken Tucker, meet Robert Brown ..., Jim Black, 13:46
- Re: Prime sequences, quasi, 13:45
- Re: here comes probability problem again, me, 13:45
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:42
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 13:40
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., James, 13:31
- Re: here comes probability problem again, me, 13:22
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:07
- Re: a simplified Liar's Poker type game, quasi, 13:07
- Re: here comes probability problem again, Carlos Moreno, 13:04
- Re: Calculating a double integral, Konrad Viltersten, 13:01
- Re: Calculating a double integral, Konrad Viltersten, 12:59
- Re: Need knowledgable people concerning relatively theory... John Baez...?, R. Brown, 12:48
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., Rob Johnson, 12:45
- Hausdorff, not-first countable space where sequential closure = closure?, Rufus . Zee, 12:41
- Re: Calculating a double integral, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 12:38
- Re: Prime sequences, Paul Pollack, 12:37
- Re: Calculating a double integral, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 12:35
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., David C . Ullrich, 12:31
- Calculating a double integral, Konrad Viltersten, 12:26
- Integer partitions into kth powers question., neillclift, 12:15
- periodic cycle, damage, 12:05
- Dynamic Infinite sets, zuhair, 12:02
- Re: The Truth, David R Tribble, 11:51
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., James, 11:49
- Re: here comes probability problem again, Mike Terry, 11:47
- Re: The Truth, David R Tribble, 11:43
- Re: here comes probability problem again, Keith A. Lewis, 11:43
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 11:31
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 11:30
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, Ken Quirici, 11:26
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 11:25
- Re: a simplified Liar's Poker type game, Keith A. Lewis, 11:22
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., Rob Johnson, 11:18
- Re: Linear algebra, quasi, 11:00
- Linear algebra, El Blusero, 10:48
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Daryl McCullough, 10:45
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., James, 10:37
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., James, 10:26
- Missive, nikool19a, 10:23
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 09:58
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, brian a m stuckless, 09:27
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 09:09
- Re: integer solutions of z^2=y^4+y+2, john_ramsden, 08:56
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Daryl McCullough, 08:25
- Re: Old question: looking for prime number list > 1,000,000, Risto Kauppila, 08:21
- Re: integer solutions of z^2=y^4+y+2, john_ramsden, 08:18
- Re: Old question: looking for prime number list > 1,000,000, Christian Drewing, 07:47
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., Rob Johnson, 07:32
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., David C . Ullrich, 07:16
- Re: Old question: looking for prime number list > 1,000,000, Christian Drewing, 06:56
- Re: Picard's Theorem, David C . Ullrich, 06:55
- Re: Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, David C . Ullrich, 06:45
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 06:36
- Re: Integral with exp and sqrt, quasi, 06:34
- A question about "Einstein Manifolds" from Arthur L. Besse, hugolooyestijn, 06:06
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., Jules, 05:33
- Integral with exp and sqrt, Andreas Dieckmann, 05:27
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Aatu Koskensilta, 05:24
- Rational solutions family, M.A.Fajjal, 05:18
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, , 05:12
- Re: Integration by using derivative, Dr Tim, 05:10
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Kees, 05:09
- Re: how to compute the eigenvalue and eigenvector of this matrix?, Dr Tim, 04:55
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 04:16
- Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology and never gets to the center of truth, a_plutonium, 04:10
- Flashsave , a wonderful network hard discs, zhuyingpingster, 03:53
- Re: Prime sequences, quasi, 03:48
- Multiplicativity of the (homotopy) degree, WassilyDali, 03:48
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Keith Ramsay, 03:41
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, David Ames, 03:41
- OEM MS 2003 software @ wholesale price$, "Kelly Hendrix", 03:28
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Virgil, 03:25
- Re: Integral containing product of Bessel functions, Paul Abbott, 03:22
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 03:22
- Re: Prime sequences, José Carlos Santos, 03:11
- Re: Prime sequences, quasi, 03:11
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Ross A. Finlayson, 03:03
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, brian a m stuckless, 02:49
- Re: Old question: looking for prime number list > 1,000,000, Fermat, 02:44
- Re: Prime sequences, Torkel Franzen, 02:32
- Re: Find Root, Robert Israel, 02:28
- Prime sequences, Andrew Usher, 02:24
- piecewise power tower interpolation, Matt, 02:21
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Jonathan Hoyle, 02:08
- Re: strange relation, Gib Bogle, 01:16
- Re: a simplified Liar's Poker type game, quasi, 01:06
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., The World Wide Wade, 00:59
- Re: Lebesgue integrable function, The World Wide Wade, 00:57
- Lebesgue integrable function, stupidG, 00:43
- Re: here comes probability problem again, me, 00:19
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Torkel Franzen, 00:10
December 28, 2005
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:58
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 23:54
- Re: Looking for a good number theory book with lots of theorems., Abdulla, 23:50
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Jonathan Hoyle, 23:37
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, Proginoskes, 23:29
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, donstockbauer, 23:28
- Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology and never gets to the center of truth, Proginoskes, 23:23
- Re: Picard's Theorem, David Kanter, 23:21
- Re: here comes probability problem again, Mkajuma, 22:55
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 22:33
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Narasimham, 22:33
- Integration by using derivative, Abstract Dissonance, 22:28
- Re: think in sets, N. Silver, 22:14
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., James, 22:12
- predict 43 rd mersenne prime exponent.. exp(.4 * 43) = 29 502 925.9, don . lotto, 22:01
- Re: strange relation, N. Silver, 21:56
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, N. Silver, 21:49
- think in sets, Gary Weselle, 21:40
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, deepkdeb, 21:37
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Don Taylor, 21:36
- Re: integer solutions of z^2=y^4+y+2, Nobody, 21:22
- Re: Integral of analytic function question.., The World Wide Wade, 21:11
- Re: Find Root, quasi, 21:07
- Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology and never gets to the center of truth, Dik T. Winter, 21:01
- Re: An L space question, The World Wide Wade, 21:00
- Re: Picard's Theorem, The World Wide Wade, 20:58
- strange relation, jose, 20:52
- Re: Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, Rouben Rostamian, 20:29
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Robert J. Kolker, 20:13
- Integral of analytic function question.., James, 20:09
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, Ken Quirici, 20:05
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, Ken Quirici, 20:03
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, Dik T. Winter, 19:54
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Chris Osborn, 19:42
- An L space question, Bob, 19:39
- Picard's Theorem, David Kanter, 19:30
- Re: Measure problem, Ronald Bruck, 19:26
- Re: Measure problem, Ronald Bruck, 19:25
- here comes probability problem again, me, 19:14
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, banmilk, 19:11
- Re: How would you go about this percent problem?, quasi, 19:05
- Re: How would you go about this percent problem?, me, 19:01
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:00
- Re: How would you go about this percent problem?, quasi, 19:00
- Re: a simplified Liar's Poker type game, quasi, 18:53
- Measure problem, stupidG, 18:52
- Find Root, Wing, 18:45
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 17:52
- Your order of a degr3e, "Jesus Fletcher", 17:37
- Re: Math classes via listserv, Karl M. Bunday, 17:37
- Re: Integrals: 1/(sin(x))^5 Software, Peter L. Montgomery, 17:33
- Re: Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, Couttsie, 17:22
- Re: Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, Couttsie, 17:12
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Torkel Franzen, 17:11
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Torkel Franzen, 17:10
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Don Taylor, 17:05
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 17:01
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, abe . buckingham, 16:52
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Daryl McCullough, 16:46
- Re: Bertrand's Postulate for AP's, Dave Rusin, 16:41
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, me, 16:31
- Re: How would you go about this percent problem?, me, 16:29
- Re: How would you go about this percent problem?, me, 16:28
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, David Ames, 16:26
- Re: Absolute continuity, Bounded variation question, ArtflDodgr, 16:23
- Re: Old question: looking for prime number list > 1,000,000, Robert Israel, 16:11
- Re: Absolute continuity, Bounded variation question, James, 16:10
- Re: Absolute continuity, Bounded variation question, The World Wide Wade, 16:07
- Re: How would you go about this percent problem?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 16:03
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Kees, 16:01
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Virgil, 15:52
- Re: Interior of a simplex is an open subset of the simplex?, barr, 15:51
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:50
- Re: fitting data, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 15:43
- Absolute continuity, Bounded variation question, James, 15:38
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han . deBruijn, 15:27
- Re: Calculating the missing Vector., jeuro, 15:25
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Herman Rubin, 15:24
- Re: Calculating the missing Vector., G.E. Ivey, 15:22
- Re: integer solutions of z^2=y^4+y+2, Dave Rusin, 15:09
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:02
- Re: Old question: looking for prime number list > 1,000,000, Dave, 15:01
- Re: Old question: looking for prime number list > 1,000,000, Dave, 14:55
- Re: integer solutions of z^2=y^4+y+2, Peter L. Montgomery, 14:49
- Re: How would you go about this percent problem?, Mike Terry, 14:39
- Nominate someone for a degr3e, "Fernando Waddell", 14:38
- Re: Induction and Fund. Thm. of Arithmetic, GKe4848094, 14:36
- Re: The Truth, David R Tribble, 14:35
- Re: Calculating the missing Vector., jeuro, 14:33
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Mike Terry, 14:28
- Re: The Truth, David R Tribble, 14:24
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:22
- Old question: looking for prime number list > 1,000,000, Christian Drewing, 14:21
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 14:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:19
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, me, 14:18
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, me, 14:17
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, me, 14:16
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, me, 14:16
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 14:15
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Torkel Franzen, 14:15
- How would you go about this percent problem?, me, 14:15
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 14:03
- Re: all inclusive proof of power rule, alainverghote, 14:01
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, Happy Hippy, 13:52
- Re: Calculating the missing Vector., Mike Terry, 13:49
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 13:48
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 13:48
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Don Taylor, 13:44
- Re: integer solutions of z^2=y^4+y+2, steiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 13:44
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, Ken Quirici, 13:28
- Re: Interior of a simplex is an open subset of the simplex?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:27
- Re: think in sets, Mike Terry, 13:09
- Re: all inclusive proof of power rule, The World Wide Wade, 13:06
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, James Dolan, 13:04
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Chris Osborn, 13:01
- Re: Integral containing product of Bessel functions, Andy, 12:56
- Re: Looking for a good number theory book with lots of theorems., steiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:55
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Torkel Franzen, 12:50
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Chris Osborn, 12:43
- Re: Integrals: 1/(sin(x))^5 Software, Ronald Bruck, 12:39
- Octave - Prepend zeros, PaulHjelmstad, 12:33
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Daryl McCullough, 12:28
- Integrals: 1/(sin(x))^5 Software, bvandenbon, 12:20
- Calculating the missing Vector., jeuro, 12:15
- Re: all inclusive proof of power rule, Herman Rubin, 11:45
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Herman Rubin, 11:34
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, Pubkeybreaker, 11:32
- Re: Induction and Fund. Thm. of Arithmetic, Bill Dubuque, 11:30
- junk, Tomasz Dabrowski, 11:22
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, David Ames, 11:18
- Re: Helly's theorem, David C . Ullrich, 11:14
- Re: a simplified Liar's Poker type game, Phil Carmody, 11:14
- Re: Math classes via listserv, Torkel Franzen, 11:09
- Math classes via listserv, STAt, 11:08
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Daryl McCullough, 11:04
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 10:29
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 10:21
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 10:15
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 10:09
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 10:07
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 10:04
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw? - Certainly not, JEMebius, 09:53
- Re: Helly's theorem, David M Einstein, 09:31
- Re: Integral containing product of Bessel functions, Andy, 09:17
- Re: all inclusive proof of power rule, David C . Ullrich, 09:16
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, David C . Ullrich, 09:14
- Helly's theorem, eugene, 08:37
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, stu, 08:00
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, alainverghote, 07:54
- Re: think in sets, William Elliot, 07:52
- Re: How to get the answer fast?, Phil Carmody, 07:51
- integer solutions of z^2=y^4+y+2, Dob, 07:27
- Complex analysis questions, Abdulla, 07:22
- Interior of a simplex is an open subset of the simplex?, Jonas, 07:09
- Re: Differentiation under the integral sign, smn, 06:48
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Kees, 06:48
- Re: a simplified Liar's Poker type game, quasi, 06:32
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 06:27
- a simplified Liar's Poker type game, quasi, 06:25
- Re: think in sets, William Elliot, 06:11
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Rob Johnson, 05:49
- Re: IAM He by jESUS: "Cease & desist in your NONSENSE.!!", john_ramsden, 05:28
- Re: Godel incompleteness theorem proof, Aatu Koskensilta, 05:18
- 3 dimensional puzzles, Anthony, 05:01
- Re: Complex uniform convergence on compact subsets question, Jannick Asmus, 04:33
- Re: math in WinEdit, Robert Low, 04:26
- You are nominated for the MBA, "Jerald Kelly", 03:42
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 03:36
- OT: Apples = Oranges Article in the Onion, Proginoskes, 03:24
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, Proginoskes, 03:10
- Re: What is the norm of a gaussian variable?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 03:00
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, a_plutonium, 02:51
- Re: Looking for a good number theory book with lots of theorems., Fermat, 02:50
- Re: axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology and never gets to the center of truth, a_plutonium, 02:36
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 02:30
- Re: What is the norm of a gaussian variable?, Robert Israel, 02:21
- axiom systems in math is like Linnaeus classification in biology and never gets to the center of truth, a_plutonium, 02:16
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Chris Osborn, 02:13
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, Robert Israel, 01:58
- Re: a game -- piles of stones, quasi, 01:45
- Re: an open ball, Robert Israel, 01:36
- What is the norm of a gaussian variable?, hmobahi, 01:31
- Re: all inclusive proof of power rule, Mkajuma, 01:29
- Re: Tables of basic Derivation and Integration formulae, karl, 01:27
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 01:25
- Re: a game -- piles of stones, Ted Hwa, 00:59
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, Ted Hwa, 00:56
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, Ted Hwa, 00:52
- Re: Statement of Kato's Conjecture, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:28
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 00:27
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, quasi, 00:21
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, Dave L. Renfro, 00:15
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, quasi, 00:08
- Re: fitting data, alexandru . lupas, 00:01
December 27, 2005
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:57
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, The World Wide Wade, 23:54
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 23:46
- Re: velocity problem in two dimensions, Barry Schwarz, 23:40
- Re: all inclusive proof of power rule, William Elliot, 23:35
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, Kenneth Bull, 23:34
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, Dave L. Renfro, 23:33
- Tables of basic Derivation and Integration formulae, shrqureshi, 23:29
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, quasi, 23:24
- Re: a game -- piles of stones, quasi, 23:20
- all inclusive proof of power rule, R. Colacitti, 23:12
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, me, 23:04
- Re: a game -- piles of stones, quasi, 23:03
- Announcement: Jakarta Commons Math 1.1 Released, Phil Steitz, 23:01
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, Ted Hwa, 22:53
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 22:40
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 22:36
- Re: math in WinEdit, Rouben Rostamian, 22:36
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 22:35
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 22:34
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 22:32
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 22:29
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 22:19
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 22:06
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, Kenneth Bull, 22:06
- Re: Another question about derivatives, The World Wide Wade, 22:00
- Re: The Truth, Rendall Wojtas, 21:38
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Dave Seaman, 21:31
- Re: velocity problem in two dimensions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:09
- Re: Integral containing product of Bessel functions, Julian V. Noble, 21:02
- Re: Maximizing function, sherwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:01
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:54
- Re: Least Absolute Deviation Regression, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:48
- Re: logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, The World Wide Wade, 20:31
- Re: Least Absolute Deviation Regression, Erwin Kalvelagen, 20:31
- Re: Differentiation under the integral sign, The World Wide Wade, 20:22
- Re: Differentiation under the integral sign, The World Wide Wade, 20:16
- Re: Maximizing function, sherwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:54
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, banmilk, 19:53
- logarithmic differentiation - flaw?, Kenneth Bull, 19:36
- Re: Maximizing function, Robert Israel, 19:16
- Re: Statement of Kato's Conjecture, quasi, 19:07
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Daryl McCullough, 19:06
- Re: math in WinEdit, Robert Israel, 18:51
- Re: Looking for a good number theory book with lots of theorems., quasi, 18:49
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, abe . buckingham, 18:43
- Re: matrix group question, Timothy Murphy, 18:43
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 18:42
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Robert Israel, 18:41
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, abe . buckingham, 18:35
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Dave Seaman, 18:31
- Maximizing function, sherwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:29
- Statement of Kato's Conjecture, Daryl McCullough, 18:26
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, Dave L. Renfro, 18:25
- Least Absolute Deviation Regression, dontspam, 18:20
- Looking for a good number theory book with lots of theorems., scott7261@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:05
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, scott7261@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:03
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, quasi, 17:37
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 17:27
- Re: Question on absolute continuity, L^1 convergence, The World Wide Wade, 17:26
- Re: Differentiation under the integral sign, smn, 17:20
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, quasi, 17:17
- Re: Fubini's theorem, mathman, 17:09
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, markwh04, 17:07
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 17:03
- Re: Need knowledgable people concerning relatively theory... John Baez...?, markwh04, 16:58
- Re: Boolean logic, third value (true=false case), markwh04, 16:55
- matrix group question, Michael Blanc, 16:49
- Re: une fonction croissante, I.N. Galidakis, 16:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 16:41
- Re: Prime number theorem question, Fermat, 16:40
- Re: Santa Claus speed, markwh04, 16:31
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, Dave L. Renfro, 16:30
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Dement, 16:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 16:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 16:24
- Re: Complex uniform convergence on compact subsets question, Jannick Asmus, 15:55
- Re: une fonction croissante, Julien Santini, 15:52
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, stu, 15:46
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 15:37
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 15:36
- Re: Studying maths at high-school, Wayne Brown, 15:08
- Differentiation under the integral sign, Julien Santini, 15:04
- Re: Induction and Fund. Thm. of Arithmetic, barr, 15:02
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Torkel Franzen, 14:44
- Can you embed the Beltrami plane in 3-space?, barr, 14:43
- Re: math in WinEdit, Ioannis, 14:31
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han . deBruijn, 14:27
- Differentiation of an integral, Julien Santini, 14:21
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han . deBruijn, 14:16
- Question on absolute continuity, L^1 convergence, James, 14:10
- Re: an open ball, David C . Ullrich, 14:07
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Kees, 14:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:02
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 13:57
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 13:53
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Herman Rubin, 13:52
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, Virgil, 13:41
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Kobu, 13:41
- Re: velocity problem in two dimensions, Virgil, 13:39
- math in WinEdit, lataianu bogdan, 13:36
- Re: how to compute the eigenvalue and eigenvector of this matrix?, comtech, 13:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 13:11
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Kobu, 13:04
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Kobu, 13:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 12:50
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 12:50
- Integral containing product of Bessel functions, Andy, 12:42
- Re: Induction and Fund. Thm. of Arithmetic, Ed Hook, 12:37
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Christian Bau, 12:37
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:32
- Re: Why Einstein Misunderstood His Own Theory, T.H. Ray, 12:26
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Christian Bau, 12:24
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Christian Bau, 12:18
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 12:15
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 12:13
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, Keith A. Lewis, 12:07
- Re: direction of vector in tagent space, Mike Terry, 12:04
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, Keith A. Lewis, 11:51
- Re: Another question about derivatives, Mike Terry, 11:50
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Christian Bau, 11:49
- Re: Complex uniform convergence on compact subsets question, James, 11:41
- Re: Complex uniform convergence on compact subsets question, James, 11:32
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Rob Johnson, 11:14
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, Michael Hennebry, 11:14
- Re: Complex uniform convergence on compact subsets question, Jannick Asmus, 11:09
- Complex uniform convergence on compact subsets question, James, 10:55
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, The Qurqirish Dragon, 10:53
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, Randy Poe, 10:34
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, Keith A. Lewis, 10:18
- Re: How to get these GRE answer fast?, Robert Low, 09:59
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, Christopher J. Henrich, 09:45
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Dave L. Renfro, 09:05
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, The Ghost In The Machine, 09:00
- Re: How to get these GRE answer fast?, Dave Seaman, 08:40
- Re: velocity problem in two dimensions, john, 08:25
- Godel incompleteness theorem proof, RemiBernal, 07:49
- Re: une fonction croissante, john, 07:48
- Re: A pi and e calculation producing a periodic cf., Dan, 07:45
- une fonction croissante, matheffex@xxxxxxxxx, 07:13
- Good Math Puzzle, Naren, 06:43
- Re: يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر, Gib Bogle, 06:42
- Re: velocity problem in two dimensions, Gib Bogle, 06:41
- Re: Another question about derivatives, David C . Ullrich, 06:36
- Re: an open ball, David C . Ullrich, 06:31
- Re: Prime number theorem question, quasi, 06:27
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, Proginoskes, 06:01
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, Proginoskes, 05:57
- Re: Another question about derivatives, SuGuang,Dou, 05:55
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, alainverghote, 05:49
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, Proginoskes, 05:47
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, Proginoskes, 05:46
- Re: Prime number theorem question, quasi, 05:42
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, Proginoskes, 05:38
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, Proginoskes, 05:30
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, Fermat, 05:29
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 05:27
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, quasi, 05:26
- Prime number theorem question, Fermat, 05:17
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Fermat, 05:08
- velocity problem in two dimensions, scott . mcmasters, 04:56
- Re: How to get these GRE answer fast?, Robert Low, 04:53
- Re: to osbo...another probability (using factorial) question, Robert Low, 04:51
- Re: Cross products, Robert Low, 04:50
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 04:49
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Robert Low, 04:43
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 04:28
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 04:17
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 04:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 04:01
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 03:57
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 03:53
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 03:52
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 03:49
- Clickthrough to achieve recoginition, "Mildred Frey", 03:27
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, quasi, 01:39
- Re: an open ball, Robert Israel, 01:30
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, a_plutonium, 01:00
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, a_plutonium, 00:57
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, quasi, 00:52
- Re: Another question about derivatives, Gib Bogle, 00:51
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, a_plutonium, 00:46
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 00:42
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Gib Bogle, 00:17
December 26, 2005
- Re: orthogonal trajectories, Carl Parkes, 23:59
- Call for Papers: The 2006 IAENG International Workshop on Scientific Computing and Computational Statistics, imecs2006, 23:59
- Re: Finding a diagonal of a box, quasi, 23:45
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, Richard Henry, 23:45
- Finding a diagonal of a box, me, 23:41
- Re: Fubini's theorem, Ronald Bruck, 23:34
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, The World Wide Wade, 23:33
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, me, 23:22
- Re: 10^20 vs 20^10, quasi, 23:21
- 10^20 vs 20^10, me, 23:19
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Dik T. Winter, 23:15
- Re: an improper integral, Ronald Bruck, 23:09
- Re: A pi and e calculation producing a periodic cf., Robert Israel, 23:09
- American Buddhism - Critique of Science - Quotations by Dr. Frederick Lenz, ramaquotes, 23:07
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Ken Quirici, 23:04
- Re: Limit of integral question,,, James, 22:59
- Re: x^x = 1/4, David W . Cantrell, 22:48
- Induction and Fund. Thm. of Arithmetic, GKe4848094, 22:20
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, Dik T. Winter, 22:08
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, quasi, 22:08
- Re: Horny pills - $2.99/dose, Dave L. Renfro, 22:07
- Re: Another question about derivatives, Dave L. Renfro, 22:01
- Re: how to change name of song in Itunes, Dik T. Winter, 21:57
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Dave L. Renfro, 21:48
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Dik T. Winter, 21:45
- Re: Santa Claus speed, Joseph Hertzlinger, 21:45
- Re: orthogonal trajectories, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 21:41
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, me, 21:41
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Dik T. Winter, 21:39
- Re: Another question about derivatives, quasi, 21:25
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Dik T. Winter, 21:19
- Re: Another question about derivatives, Dave L. Renfro, 21:05
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 20:52
- Re: Another question about derivatives, quasi, 20:48
- Re: P(AorB)=0.60; P(A)-0.20. Find P(B) if A and B are independent., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 20:27
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, quasi, 20:08
- orthogonal trajectories, Luke Wu, 20:07
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 19:56
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 19:47
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:37
- Re: Another question about derivatives, quasi, 19:17
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, quasi, 19:15
- FW: New phd for you, "Rob Arias", 19:12
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, quasi, 19:12
- Re: Another question about derivatives, Rouben Rostamian, 19:10
- Re: an improper integral, Igor Khavkine, 19:08
- Re: Another question about derivatives, The World Wide Wade, 19:01
- Re: how to change name of song in Itunes, Ulrich Sondermann, 18:59
- Re: onto function viewpoint, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 18:52
- $B$*K;$7$$$G$9$+!)(B, info, 18:50
- Re: onto function viewpoint, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 18:47
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, Keith A. Lewis, 18:47
- The Mautsch method for cubics, David M Einstein, 18:46
- A pi and e calculation producing a periodic cf., Dan, 18:42
- Re: Another question about derivatives, quasi, 18:42
- Re: another improper integral, Igor Khavkine, 18:40
- Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi, 18:30
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Ioannis, 18:30
- Re: Another question about derivatives, The World Wide Wade, 18:29
- Re: Another question about derivatives, The World Wide Wade, 18:27
- Re: Another question about derivatives, David C . Ullrich, 18:24
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Gib Bogle, 18:13
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, John Porcella, 17:57
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, John Porcella, 17:56
- Re: an improper integral, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 17:53
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, quasi, 17:44
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 17:44
- Re: General property of selected polynomials, Roman B. Binder, 17:22
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 17:11
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 17:05
- Re: Another question about derivatives, Rob Johnson, 17:04
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, Keith A. Lewis, 17:04
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Gib Bogle, 16:58
- another improper integral, eugene, 16:53
- Re: The Truth, Rendall Wojtas, 16:52
- Re: Fubini's theorem, mathman, 16:51
- an improper integral, eugene, 16:50
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, quasi, 16:46
- Re: P(AorB)=0.60; P(A)-0.20. Find P(B) if A and B are independent., mathman, 16:46
- Re: Another question about derivatives, Ron Sperber, 16:42
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, Chris Menzel, 16:34
- Re: Another question about derivatives, Rouben Rostamian, 16:28
- Re: an open ball, Robert Israel, 16:24
- Re: a question on locally compactness, Marc Olschok, 16:22
- Horny pills - $2.99/dose, George King, 16:01
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
- Re: Another question about derivatives, quasi, 15:54
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, quasi, 15:46
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, quasi, 15:44
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel, 15:38
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, quasi, 15:37
- Re: Limit of integral question,,, Rob Johnson, 15:20
- Re: Another question about derivatives, The World Wide Wade, 15:02
- Re: onto function viewpoint, Gary Weselle, 15:02
- Re: onto function viewpoint, Gary Weselle, 14:56
- Another question about derivatives, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:38
- Re: Limit of integral question,,, Rob Johnson, 14:33
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:16
- Re: an open ball, quasi, 14:16
- Re: x^x = 1/4, David W . Cantrell, 14:06
- Re: P(AorB)=0.60; P(A)-0.20. Find P(B) if A and B are independent., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 14:04
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, a_plutonium, 14:04
- Re: x^x = 1/4, gaya . patel, 14:01
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Keith A. Lewis, 13:54
- Re: water pressure, Keith A. Lewis, 13:35
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, a_plutonium, 13:33
- Re: Fubini's theorem, Ronald Bruck, 13:20
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:20
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 13:00
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, Keith A. Lewis, 12:57
- Bayesian Statistic, me, 12:51
- Re: A probability problem about calculating the expectation, jing . hu, 12:51
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 12:49
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, zuhair, 12:37
- Limit of integral question,,, James, 12:35
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:31
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Torkel Franzen, 12:09
- Re: Fubini's theorem, G.E. Ivey, 12:08
- Re: Can we apply inverses to two variables?, G.E. Ivey, 12:07
- Fubini's theorem, James, 11:52
- direction of vector in tagent space, Gary Weselle, 11:44
- Re: Can we apply inverses to two variables?, deniz . bahar, 11:39
- Re: The Truth, Rendall Wojtas, 11:32
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Herman Rubin, 11:25
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Siraj Kutlusan, 11:20
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, me, 11:16
- Re: Answers of "List the positive divisors of 372?" are; What's the fastest approach?, me, 11:12
- Re: How to get these GRE answer fast?, me, 11:04
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, me, 10:49
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, me, 10:48
- Re: Answers of "List the positive divisors of 372?" are; What's the fastest approach?, me, 10:43
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Ken Quirici, 10:35
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, me, 10:34
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, me, 10:26
- Re: x^x = 1/4, john, 10:24
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, The Qurqirish Dragon, 09:50
- Re: how to change name of song in Itunes, john_ramsden, 09:07
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Aatu Koskensilta, 09:04
- Re: يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر, john_ramsden, 09:02
- Re: Is a space always dense in its double dual?, barr, 08:55
- Re: Mobius transformation question, David C . Ullrich, 08:54
- Re: an open ball, David C . Ullrich, 08:47
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, The Ghost In The Machine, 08:00
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, The Ghost In The Machine, 08:00
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Aatu Koskensilta, 07:44
- Re: Can we apply inverses to two variables?, quasi, 06:43
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Ioannis, 05:48
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 26, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:44
- Cialis bestseller, "Nicholas", 05:31
- Re: x^x = 1/4, john, 05:08
- يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر, Dr_mohamed_hassan_103, 05:06
- يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر, Dr_mohamed_hassan_103, 05:05
- Re: old number puzzle, Robert Israel, 04:46
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Robert Israel, 04:41
- Re: correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 04:31
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, a_plutonium, 04:01
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, a_plutonium, 03:40
- Re: Studying maths at high-school, Gib Bogle, 03:08
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, The Ghost In The Machine, 02:00
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, The Ghost In The Machine, 02:00
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, Virgil, 01:39
- correcting the Wikipedia page on Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof, a_plutonium, 01:30
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, a_plutonium, 01:22
- Re: Studying maths at high-school, Igor Khavkine, 01:14
- Re: A probability problem about calculating the expectation, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 01:13
- $B8D<<4U>^!JF~>lL5NA!K(B, info, 01:10
- Re: body of trig funcs, Gerard 46, 01:07
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, quasi, 01:05
- Re: Any recommendations for grad schools?, Mkajuma, 01:02
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, Mkajuma, 00:56
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 00:50
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, Proginoskes, 00:47
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, quasi, 00:45
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 00:44
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 00:43
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, Mkajuma, 00:42
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, Proginoskes, 00:38
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 00:30
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, quasi, 00:24
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, Mkajuma, 00:22
- Re: Convergence theorems question.., Ronald Bruck, 00:21
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, quasi, 00:20
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, Mkajuma, 00:17
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 00:16
- Re: A probability problem about calculating the expectation, jing . hu, 00:16
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, Mkajuma, 00:13
- Re: an open ball, Ronald Bruck, 00:12
December 25, 2005
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, mountain man, 23:59
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Proginoskes, 23:55
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, quasi, 23:54
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, Proginoskes, 23:54
- Re: Any recommendations for grad schools?, Kobu, 23:52
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Kobu, 23:46
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, Proginoskes, 23:46
- Re: A probability problem about calculating the expectation, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 23:45
- Re: body of trig funcs, Buddahlovesyou, 23:38
- Re: how to change name of song in Itunes, Proginoskes, 23:38
- Any recommendations for grad schools?, John, 23:25
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, John, 23:23
- Re: is this proof of product rule rigorous (any loop holes?), i . love . jeevitha, 23:11
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, quasi, 22:36
- Re: how to compute the eigenvalue and eigenvector of this matrix?, Dr Tim, 22:34
- Re: Cross products, Dik T. Winter, 22:26
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Dik T. Winter, 22:22
- Re: how to solve this probability?, Gib Bogle, 22:21
- Re: If an integer is randomly selected from all positive 2-digit integers (i.e the integers 10, 11, 12, ....,99), Mkajuma, 22:20
- Re: Answers of "List the positive divisors of 372?" are; What's the fastest approach?, Mkajuma, 22:18
- Re: P(AorB)=0.60; P(A)-0.20. Find P(B) if A and B are independent., Mkajuma, 22:12
- Re: How to get these GRE answer fast?, Richard Henry, 22:10
- Re: General property of selected polynomials, quasi, 22:07
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, Mkajuma, 22:04
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Chris Osborn, 21:57
- Re: Can we apply inverses to two variables?, quasi, 21:52
- Re: If an integer is randomly selected from all positive 2-digit integers (i.e the integers 10, 11, 12, ....,99), me, 21:39
- P(AorB)=0.60; P(A)-0.20. Find P(B) if A and B are independent., me, 21:31
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Aatu Koskensilta, 21:30
- Re: If an integer is randomly selected from all positive 2-digit integers (i.e the integers 10, 11, 12, ....,99), quasi, 21:29
- Re: Can we apply inverses to two variables?, deniz . bahar, 21:27
- Answers of "List the positive divisors of 372?" are; What's the fastest approach?, me, 21:27
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Kenneth Bull, 21:25
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, quasi, 21:23
- Thanks - Re: How to get these GRE answer fast?, me, 21:20
- Thanks - Re: If an integer is randomly selected from all positive 2-digit integers (i.e the integers 10, 11, 12, ....,99), me, 21:18
- Ultimate, God-like Algorithm, Chris Osborn, 21:17
- Re: If an integer is randomly selected from all positive 2-digit integers (i.e the integers 10, 11, 12, ....,99), Chris Osborn, 21:09
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Gib Bogle, 21:08
- If an integer is randomly selected from all positive 2-digit integers (i.e the integers 10, 11, 12, ....,99), me, 21:03
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:00
- How to get these GRE answer fast?, me, 20:59
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Chris Osborn, 20:59
- Re: to osbo...another probability (using factorial) question, me, 20:58
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, me, 20:55
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, me, 20:53
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Robert Israel, 20:52
- Re: to osbo...another probability (using factorial) question, Chris Osborn, 20:51
- Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi, 20:49
- Re: to osbo...another probability (using factorial) question, mathman, 20:48
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, a_plutonium, 20:46
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel, 20:46
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, Jules, 20:45
- Re: How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, quasi, 20:45
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, Herman Rubin, 20:42
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, a_plutonium, 20:40
- How to get the answer fast?, me, 20:35
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel, 20:33
- Re: Can we apply inverses to two variables?, quasi, 20:30
- How many 3-digit positive integrs are odd and do not contain the digit "5"?, me, 20:30
- to osbo...another probability (using factorial) question, me, 20:26
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 20:09
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Robert J. Kolker, 20:06
- Re: how to solve this probability?, osbornc, 20:06
- Re: Finally, you can afford software by Windows XP Windows XP & Adobe, Windows, Robert J. Kolker, 20:04
- Re: Finally, you can afford software by Windows XP Windows XP & Adobe, Windows, Robert J. Kolker, 20:03
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Aatu Koskensilta, 20:02
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, The Ghost In The Machine, 20:00
- Re: Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, The Ghost In The Machine, 20:00
- Re: Cross products, Dik T. Winter, 20:00
- how to solve this probability?, me, 19:45
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Kobu, 19:41
- Re: Dominated convergence question, integral, James, 19:37
- Re: Can we apply inverses to two variables?, deniz . bahar, 19:34
- Re: Can we apply inverses to two variables?, Lee Rudolph, 19:32
- Can we apply inverses to two variables?, deniz . bahar, 19:30
- Re: an open ball, quasi, 19:13
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Kenneth Bull, 19:11
- Re: x^x = 1/4, john, 18:52
- Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi, 18:52
- Re: direction of vector in tagent space, Gib Bogle, 18:41
- A probability problem about calculating the expectation, jing . hu, 18:29
- Re: x^x = 1/4, Gib Bogle, 18:27
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Ken Quirici, 18:26
- Re: Dominated convergence question, integral, José Carlos Santos, 18:23
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, mountain man, 18:21
- Re: x^x = 1/4, john, 18:20
- Re: x^x = 1/4, john, 18:18
- Re: Analytic Series, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 18:12
- Re: Studying maths at high-school, Gib Bogle, 18:10
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Gib Bogle, 18:05
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Gib Bogle, 18:03
- Correcting the Wikipedia page on the Peano Axioms, today 25DEC2005, a_plutonium, 18:01
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:56
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover, barr, 17:50
- Dominated convergence question, integral, James, 17:43
- Automatic Theorem Prover, osbornc, 17:34
- General property of selected polynomials, Roman B. Binder, 17:20
- Finally, you can afford software by Windows XP Windows XP & Adobe, Windows, "Melanie Messer", 17:20
- Re: x^x = 1/4, lataianu bogdan, 17:14
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, Robert Low, 17:12
- Mobius transformation question, James, 17:07
- Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi, 17:03
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, The Ghost In The Machine, 17:00
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, stu, 16:46
- Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi, 16:40
- x^x = 1/4, gaya . patel, 16:18
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Peteris Krumins, 16:06
- Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, Angela, 15:57
- Re: Bacteriology and number theory, Herman Rubin, 15:51
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, zuhair, 15:09
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, R. Colacitti, 14:55
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, R. Colacitti, 14:48
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, a_plutonium, 14:45
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Jules, 14:21
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, a_plutonium, 14:19
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, stu, 14:09
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:07
- Re: infinity, Dave L. Renfro, 14:01
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Dave L. Renfro, 13:45
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, Dave L. Renfro, 13:30
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 13:23
- Re: Differentiable Homotopy?, Ed Hook, 13:20
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, Dave L. Renfro, 12:55
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, buyukadali, 12:53
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, buyukadali, 12:51
- Re: Analytic Series, José Carlos Santos, 12:50
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, fishfry, 12:48
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, stu, 12:28
- Studying maths at high-school, Siraj Kutlusan, 12:07
- Reward your experience with marketable degr3e, "Marcus Corley", 12:02
- Re: infinity, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Badduh, 11:59
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Siraj Kutlusan, 11:58
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, R. Colacitti, 11:57
- Re: how to change name of song in Itunes, Leroy Zipper, 11:55
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, R. Colacitti, 11:49
- Re: What does 1+1=2 really mean?, Robert J. Kolker, 11:49
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, R. Colacitti, 11:41
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, Virgil, 11:41
- What does 1+1=2 really mean?, stu, 11:27
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 11:05
- Re: infinity, William Elliot, 10:23
- Re: infinity, Robert J. Kolker, 10:20
- Re: onto function viewpoint, Gary Weselle, 10:18
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 09:58
- infinity, hysenthomas, 09:56
- Re: Is a space always dense in its double dual?, David C . Ullrich, 09:30
- Re: Is a space always dense in its double dual?, David C . Ullrich, 09:17
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, Happy Hippy, 09:12
- Re: Analytic Series, David C . Ullrich, 09:05
- Differentiable Homotopy?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:28
- Re: mathematical notation question, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:10
- Re: an open ball, William Elliot, 07:53
- Re: Convergence theorems question.., David C . Ullrich, 07:42
- Is a space always dense in its double dual?, Kira Yamato, 07:41
- Re: Convergence theorems question.., David C . Ullrich, 07:39
- Re: L^p convergence another question.., David C . Ullrich, 07:33
- Re: L^p convergence another question.., David C . Ullrich, 07:31
- Re: old number puzzle, M.A.Fajjal, 06:58
- Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, The Last Danish Pastry, 06:41
- Re: an open ball, quasi, 06:13
- Re: an open ball, quasi, 06:08
- Try the new miracle weight loss herb, "Rogert", 05:52
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Ivor Jones, 05:24
- Re: Analytic Series, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 04:53
- Re: Analytic Series, José Carlos Santos, 04:44
- how to change name of song in Itunes, a_plutonium, 04:38
- Re: body of trig funcs, quasi, 04:37
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, a_plutonium, 04:28
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, Robert Low, 04:23
- Analytic Series, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 04:14
- Re: body of trig funcs, Gib Bogle, 04:06
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, a_plutonium, 03:58
- Re: an open ball, quasi, 03:58
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 03:10
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Robert Israel, 02:59
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, Virgil, 02:47
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, Virgil, 02:43
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 02:40
- Re: an open ball, Virgil, 02:32
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, a_plutonium, 02:18
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:07
- Re: an open ball, quasi, 02:03
- Re: an open ball, quasi, 01:59
- Re: displaying the countability of Adics, Infinite Integers and Reals, Proginoskes, 01:55
- displaying the countability of Adics, Infinite Integers and Reals, a_plutonium, 01:46
- Re: Logical and sound arguments that go against Cantor, Peano and mathematicians, Proginoskes, 01:46
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, Proginoskes, 01:44
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 01:30
- Re: an open ball, William Elliot, 01:20
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, Proginoskes, 01:09
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 01:07
- Comparing 2 Infinite Trees, osbornc, 01:06
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 01:03
- Re: onto function viewpoint, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 00:58
- Re: the modern day revision of what the Natural-Numbers axioms should be and why Peano is flawed, Proginoskes, 00:52
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, Proginoskes, 00:44
- Re: Convergence theorems question.., Robert Israel, 00:42
- Re: body of trig funcs, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 00:31
- Re: Bacteriology and number theory, Badduh, 00:30
- Re: when a set has a Successor function then it is countable Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 00:29
- Re: an open ball, Robert Israel, 00:28
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, Proginoskes, 00:27
- Re: Bacteriology and number theory, quasi, 00:08
- Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, Robert Israel, 00:00
December 24, 2005
- Re: Bacteriology and number theory, Badduh, 23:45
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, Dave L. Renfro, 23:24
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, a_plutonium, 23:16
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, R. Colacitti, 23:03
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, William Elliot, 23:01
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:54
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, a_plutonium, 22:52
- Generalizing difference quotients to other operations, Dave L. Renfro, 22:49
- Re: water pressure, Phil Holman, 22:33
- Bacteriology and number theory, Peter L. Montgomery, 22:23
- Re: A variant of house selling problem (optimal stopping), Robert Israel, 22:15
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 22:08
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Kobu, 22:03
- onto function viewpoint, Gary Weselle, 21:59
- Re: bayesian statistics in insurance, DW Simpson Webmaster, 21:48
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Ted Hwa, 21:10
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, LEFTY, 21:01
- Re: the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 20:57
- Re: New Thread: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 20:53
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 20:50
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 20:48
- Re: can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Kobu, 20:33
- Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, Angela, 20:16
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, bill, 20:16
- New Thread: Two envelopes and game theory, bill, 20:09
- test, bill, 20:08
- Re: mathematical notation question, Herman Rubin, 20:07
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 20:02
- Re: examples, Robert Low, 19:51
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Robert Low, 19:49
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:47
- bayesian statistics in insurance, sigoldberg1, 19:47
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, huLLy, 19:47
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 18:52
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Torkel Franzen, 18:35
- body of trig funcs, Siraj Kutlusan, 18:13
- Re: examples, Richard Henry, 18:02
- can all F(x,y) = G(x,y) type relations be implicitly differentiated?, Kobu, 17:58
- Re: onto function viewpoint, Ted Hwa, 17:37
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Robert Low, 17:36
- Doctors and Celebrities endorse Hoodia!, "Geoffrey", 17:34
- Re: water pressure, Adnan, 17:16
- GRAVITATION EXPLAINED, ACE, 16:44
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Virgil, 16:30
- Re: Convergence theorems question.., Ronald Bruck, 16:18
- Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, The Ghost In The Machine, 16:00
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Lee Rudolph, 15:46
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Torkel Franzen, 15:43
- Re: water pressure, Me, 15:41
- Christmas sequences, Han . deBruijn, 15:40
- Re: examples, Robert Low, 15:40
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, Robert Low, 15:36
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Robert de Vincy, 15:34
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Low, 15:34
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Jeremy Boden, 15:33
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Robert Low, 15:33
- Re: an open ball, quasi, 15:29
- Re: an open ball, quasi, 15:28
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han . deBruijn, 15:12
- water pressure, Adnan, 15:08
- Re: an open ball, Mate, 15:08
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:45
- Re: examples, Virgil, 14:41
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, Virgil, 14:37
- examples, rasul . shahbazzadeh, 14:37
- Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:31
- Re: L^p convergence another question.., James, 14:30
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, R. Colacitti, 14:29
- Re: derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:22
- Re: Q: special case of cumulative trivariate normal, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:10
- derivative using first principles NOT EQUAL TO derivative using power rule, R. Colacitti, 14:04
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Torkel Franzen, 13:58
- Re: L^p convergence another question.., James, 13:52
- Re: Convergence theorems question.., James, 13:44
- Re: L^p convergence another question.., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:38
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, banmilk, 13:33
- Re: Convergence theorems question.., James, 13:31
- Re: angular velocity, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:27
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Robert Low, 13:07
- Re: L^p convergence another question.., David C . Ullrich, 13:05
- Logical and sound arguments that go against Cantor, Peano and mathematicians, a_plutonium, 13:04
- Re: Convergence theorems question.., David C . Ullrich, 13:01
- Re: Request for Sign-up, "Teresa Flowers", 12:58
- Re: why is this approximation valid, David C . Ullrich, 12:54
- Re: simplicial map, Ed Hook, 12:53
- Re: an open ball, quasi, 12:41
- the modern day revision of what the Natural-Numbers axioms should be and why Peano is flawed, a_plutonium, 12:39
- the flaw and crackpottery of the Cantor diagonal argument Re:, a_plutonium, 12:21
- Calabi Yau Spaces Sculpture Program, mustafaumutsarac, 12:07
- Re: an open ball, Ed Hook, 12:06
- when a set has a Successor function then it is countable Re: Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, a_plutonium, 12:00
- Convergence theorems question.., James, 11:35
- Re: why is this approximation valid, Rob Johnson, 11:22
- Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, The Last Danish Pastry, 11:17
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 11:11
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Richard Henry, 10:58
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 10:50
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 10:33
- an open ball, eugene, 10:26
- L^p convergence another question.., James, 10:26
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, Narasimham, 10:22
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, moop?, 10:12
- Re: Q: special case of cumulative trivariate normal, Axel Vogt, 10:12
- Re: Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, stefan . petrea, 10:05
- Known lengths of edges of an abitrary polygon, seek for area, moop?, 10:03
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Torkel Franzen, 10:03
- Re: why is this approximation valid, David C . Ullrich, 09:46
- Re: Repeat of Normal families complex analysis problem, David C . Ullrich, 09:43
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, David C . Ullrich, 09:29
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, David C . Ullrich, 09:15
- Re: Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, David C . Ullrich, 08:51
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, David C . Ullrich, 08:46
- Re: old number puzzle, M.J.T. Guy, 08:45
- Re: Is the category of schemes complete?, Nath Rao, 08:43
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Ross A. Finlayson, 08:39
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 08:02
- PROTEST OF A VICTIM OF A PROBABLE INTELLECTUAL THEFT / , bouhannache, 07:56
- Re: references sought, Badboy, 07:50
- Re: Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, Badboy, 07:35
- Re: references sought-, JEMebius, 07:33
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Torkel Franzen, 07:25
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Lee Rudolph, 07:18
- Re: Logic question, Lee Rudolph, 07:16
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Torkel Franzen, 04:24
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, JC, 04:16
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Low, 04:10
- Re: onto function viewpoint, Robert Low, 04:04
- Re: easy money - legal and seen on oprah!!!, john_ramsden, 04:03
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Robert Low, 03:58
- Re: About Cayley-Menger determinant, Randall, 03:40
- Re: partition of the real line, Mike Kent, 03:39
- Cleaning-up the Peano Axioms Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers, a_plutonium, 03:30
- Re: onto function viewpoint, William Elliot, 03:18
- Re: Logic question, Keith Ramsay, 03:15
- Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, Angela, 03:14
- Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, Angela, 03:05
- Fractal formula to calculate hyperspace-jumps ???, Lincoln Wichhurst, 02:52
- Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers that satisfies all the Peano Axioms, Proginoskes, 01:43
- Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers that satisfies all the Peano Axioms, a_plutonium, 01:27
- Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers that satisfies all the Peano Axioms, Proginoskes, 01:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 01:21
- Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers that satisfies all the Peano Axioms, Proginoskes, 01:12
- Re: Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 01:11
- Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers that satisfies all the Peano Axioms, a_plutonium, 00:50
- Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers that satisfies all the Peano Axioms, a_plutonium, 00:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 00:28
- Re: angular velocity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:19
- Re: Rook Mathematics, Keith Ramsay, 00:13
December 23, 2005
- Re: why is this approximation valid, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 23:44
- Re: how to compute the eigenvalue and eigenvector of this matrix?, Dr Tim, 23:44
- Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers that satisfies all the Peano Axioms, Proginoskes, 23:19
- Re: Geometric tangent invariants, Narasimham, 23:13
- Re: Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, Rouben Rostamian, 23:11
- About Cayley-Menger determinant, moop?, 22:40
- Re: angular velocity, Dave Seaman, 22:26
- Re: Complex Structure R^2->R^2: Is this legal?, Mike Terry, 22:19
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:09
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 21:58
- Santa Claus speed, Peter L. Montgomery, 21:39
- Re: Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, Couttsie, 21:37
- Re: Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, Couttsie, 21:33
- Re: Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, Couttsie, 21:28
- Re: references sought, Dr Tim, 21:21
- references sought, Sean McIlroy, 20:59
- Re: Q: special case of cumulative trivariate normal, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:24
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, John Porcella, 19:56
- Re: Q: special case of cumulative trivariate normal, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 19:49
- Re: M-set is halluncinatory (was, Re: basic Mandelbrot question), Conspiracy Secretary, 19:43
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:41
- $B$*K;$7$$$G$9$+!)(B, info, 19:20
- Re: why is this approximation valid, Kobu, 18:55
- Re: why is this approximation valid, david petry, 18:44
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Low, 18:38
- Re: angular velocity, snapdragon31, 18:35
- Re: angular velocity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:24
- Re: angular velocity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:22
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Virgil, 18:16
- Re: Angular Velocity - Undisplayed messages, Robert Low, 17:14
- Re: why is this approximation valid, Robert Low, 17:04
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Israel, 17:02
- Re: why is this approximation valid, Robert Israel, 16:59
- Re: angular velocity, Mohan Pawar, 16:54
- Re: Heat/Diffusion equation, Robert Israel, 16:47
- Re: Angular Velocity - Undisplayed messages, Mohan Pawar, 16:45
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 16:33
- Re: why is this approximation valid, Kobu, 16:27
- Re: GxZ is isomorphic to HxZ, but G is not isomorphic to H, , 16:25
- Re: Heat/Diffusion equation, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:25
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 16:24
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han . deBruijn, 16:24
- Re: A variant of house selling problem (optimal stopping), hopen, 16:21
- Re: partition of the real line, Robert Israel, 16:10
- Re: why is this approximation valid, Keith A. Lewis, 15:57
- Re: why is this approximation valid, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 15:51
- Re: Repeat of Normal families complex analysis problem, Robert Israel, 15:49
- Q: special case of cumulative trivariate normal, Axel Vogt, 15:49
- Re: about Rudin, David Ames, 15:30
- how to compute the eigenvalue and eigenvector of this matrix?, comtech, 15:21
- why is this approximation valid, Kobu, 15:02
- Re: partition of the real line, quasi, 14:58
- Re: Solution to Poisson-Boltzmann equation, Robert Israel, 14:40
- Heat/Diffusion equation, Jules, 14:34
- Re: partition of the real line, quasi, 14:34
- Re: GxZ is isomorphic to HxZ, but G is not isomorphic to H, abe . buckingham, 14:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:28
- Re: Angular Velocity - Undisplayed messages, Robert Low, 14:20
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 14:18
- Re: partition of the real line, cbrown, 14:16
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Low, 14:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:11
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:02
- Re: Rook Mathematics, cbrown, 14:00
- partition of the real line, eugene, 13:50
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 13:44
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 13:43
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 13:42
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:25
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, bill, 13:15
- Re: The Truth, Rendall Wojtas, 13:00
- Re: angular velocity, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:57
- Re: angular velocity, briggs, 12:45
- GxZ is isomorphic to HxZ, but G is not isomorphic to H, David Radcliffe, 12:45
- Re: angular velocity, Mohan Pawar, 12:18
- Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, Keith A. Lewis, 12:15
- Re: Angular Velocity - Undisplayed messages, Mohan Pawar, 12:00
- Angular Velocity - Undisplayed messages, Mohan Pawar, 11:56
- Re: Repeat of Normal families complex analysis problem, James, 11:49
- simplicial map, Jonas, 11:48
- Re: angular velocity, Keith A. Lewis, 11:35
- Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, Chip Eastham, 11:34
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 11:29
- Re: The Truth, Rendall Wojtas, 11:28
- Re: Complex Analysis qualifying exam problem, David C . Ullrich, 11:18
- Re: Repeat of Normal families complex analysis problem, David C . Ullrich, 11:07
- Re: is this proof of product rule rigorous (any loop holes?), David C . Ullrich, 11:04
- Re: Normal families, complex analysis question, David C . Ullrich, 10:58
- Re: easy money - legal and seen on oprah!!!, lycquan, 10:53
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:50
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 10:45
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, David C . Ullrich, 10:42
- Re: angular velocity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:32
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 10:29
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 10:16
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, David C . Ullrich, 10:16
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, David C . Ullrich, 10:11
- Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers that satisfies all the Peano Axioms, mathedman, 10:06
- Re: Fourier Transforms, Carlos Moreno, 09:57
- Repeat of Normal families complex analysis problem, James, 09:02
- Complex Analysis qualifying exam problem, James, 08:56
- Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, The Last Danish Pastry, 08:55
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, briggs, 08:26
- Re: The Truth, Rendall Wojtas, 08:26
- functional differentiation, wissam, 07:30
- Re: My problem (I don't know how to name it), Silas Justiniano, 07:14
- Re: mathematical notation question, Pubkeybreaker, 07:00
- Re: A new Array of the Infinite Integers that satisfies all the Peano Axioms, Proginoskes, 05:56
- Re: Cross products, Robert Low, 05:52
- Re: mathematical notation question, Larry Lard, 05:30
- Re: Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 05:27
- A new Array of the Infinite Integers that satisfies all the Peano Axioms, a_plutonium, 05:16
- Re: Is the category of schemes complete?, Lukas Horosiewicz, 04:52
- Geometric tangent invariants, Hauke Reddmann, 04:22
- Re: Cross products, Proginoskes, 04:15
- Re: Is the category of schemes complete?, No One, 03:47
- Re: Maximal homogeneous ideals, joe.shmoe.joe.shmoe, 03:45
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, Proginoskes, 03:43
- Fourier Transforms, Saruman, 03:43
- Re: Cross products, Robert Low, 03:40
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Low, 03:32
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, a_plutonium, 03:21
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, smn, 03:10
- Re: Logic question, Red, 03:08
- Re: Solution to Poisson-Boltzmann equation, dkjk, 03:06
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 02:56
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, Proginoskes, 02:43
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 02:43
- Re: Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 02:33
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, a_plutonium, 02:32
- Re: is this proof of product rule rigorous (any loop holes?), Proginoskes, 02:24
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Jeremy Boden, 02:23
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 02:19
- Re: Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 02:05
- Zuhair Haiku, Kid A, 01:59
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 01:57
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 01:55
- Re: Cross products, Robert Israel, 01:55
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:53
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 01:49
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, Proginoskes, 01:47
- Re: A variant of house selling problem (optimal stopping), Robert Israel, 01:43
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, William Elliot, 01:41
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 01:40
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, William Elliot, 01:39
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Jeremy Boden, 01:31
- Re: Cross products, Proginoskes, 01:08
- Re: Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 01:06
- Re: REF is unique to a given matrix, Robert Israel, 00:56
- Re: Maximal homogeneous ideals, Jannick Asmus, 00:52
- Re: A variant of house selling problem (optimal stopping), hopen, 00:42
December 22, 2005
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 22:57
- Re: Jacobian problem in dimension 2 solved, Chan-Ho Suh, 22:48
- Re: is this proof of product rule rigorous (any loop holes?), i . love . jeevitha, 22:46
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 22:40
- Re: Any countable set in the reals is a Borel set, William Elliot, 22:40
- Re: mathematical notation question, fishfry, 22:34
- Re: plot a piecewise function in maple, Rouben Rostamian, 22:23
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:19
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 22:17
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:13
- plot a piecewise function in maple, Jonas, 22:04
- Re: Any countable set in the reals is a Borel set, Bob, 22:02
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, bill, 21:57
- Re: is this proof of product rule rigorous (any loop holes?), W. Dale Hall, 21:57
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 21:51
- Re: Any countable set in the reals is a Borel set, abe . buckingham, 21:38
- Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, Robert Israel, 21:38
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 21:31
- Any countable set in the reals is a Borel set, Bob, 21:31
- Re: is this proof of product rule rigorous (any loop holes?), William Elliot, 21:25
- Re: is this proof of product rule rigorous (any loop holes?), Ronald Bruck, 21:19
- Re: REF is unique to a given matrix, ramakrishnan . kannan, 21:13
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 21:02
- Re: To determine the convergence and divergence, bottomline, 20:58
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, Robert Israel, 20:58
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Israel, 20:51
- Re: angular velocity, snapdragon31, 20:44
- Re: angular velocity, snapdragon31, 20:33
- Re: OT Undergrad Math Journals, duje, 20:29
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, bill, 20:26
- Re: angular velocity, Mohan Pawar, 20:26
- Re: Jacobian problem in dimension 2 solved, Lee Rudolph, 20:25
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, smn, 20:10
- Re: New model for primality test, rich burge, 19:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:00
- Re: angular velocity, odin, 18:56
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, , 18:56
- Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', Dave, 18:51
- Tough Combinatorics problem?, Angela, 18:49
- Re: angular velocity, odin, 18:46
- Re: angular velocity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:44
- Re: angular velocity, Horatio Hornblower, 18:32
- Re: angular velocity, martin cohen, 18:24
- Re: OT Undergrad Math Journals, rip pelletier, 18:15
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, smn, 18:10
- Re: Maximal homogeneous ideals, quasi, 17:40
- is this proof of product rule rigorous (any loop holes?), i . love . jeevitha, 17:38
- Re: angular velocity, Keith A. Lewis, 17:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:31
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:18
- Is the category of schemes complete?, Lukas Horosiewicz, 17:14
- OT Undergrad Math Journals, STAt, 17:12
- Re: Maximal homogeneous ideals, joe.shmoe.joe.shmoe, 17:09
- Re: angular velocity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:08
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Low, 16:55
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Low, 16:53
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Low, 16:49
- Re: angular velocity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:40
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Israel, 16:39
- Re: Maximal homogeneous ideals, joe.shmoe.joe.shmoe, 16:38
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Israel, 16:28
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Israel, 16:26
- Re: "Power of a number" vs. "to the power of a number", Carlos Moreno, 16:05
- Shredded Wallpaper: a thesis on wallpaper patterns tiled by border patterns, George Baloglou, 16:01
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, Risto Kauppila, 15:59
- Re: mathematical notation question, matthias, 15:56
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:53
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 15:32
- Re: "Power of a number" vs. "to the power of a number", Ronald Bruck, 15:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:26
- Re: angular velocity, Mohan Pawar, 14:54
- Re: angular velocity, Keith A. Lewis, 14:51
- Re: Can I have fries and a calculator with that?, Dave L. Renfro, 14:27
- Re: angular velocity, Robert Israel, 14:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:17
- Re: mathematical notation question, odin, 14:10
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, briggs, 14:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:57
- angular velocity, katehilton, 13:54
- Re: ONE, alan, 13:50
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:47
- Re: borel sigma algebra, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:37
- OOOOOOPS, odin, 13:32
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, Robert Sheskey, 13:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:26
- Re: mathematical notation question, Rob Johnson, 13:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:20
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, briggs, 13:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:12
- Re: mathematical notation question, Randy Poe, 13:12
- Re: "Power of a number" vs. "to the power of a number", quasi, 13:11
- Re: mathematical notation question, Dave L. Renfro, 13:11
- Re: mathematical notation question, Joseph Fagan, 13:06
- mathematical notation question, odin, 12:47
- Re: borel sigma algebra, Dave L. Renfro, 12:42
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, Timothy Murphy, 12:31
- Boolean logic, third value (true=false case), heelium@xxxxxxxxx, 12:29
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 12:22
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 12:00
- Re: old number puzzle, duje, 11:56
- Re: "Power of a number" vs. "to the power of a number", Keith A. Lewis, 11:52
- Re: "Power of a number" vs. "to the power of a number", John Coleman, 11:42
- Re: old number puzzle, duje, 11:40
- Re: ONE, John Thingstad, 11:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:23
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 11:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:12
- Re: Normal families, complex analysis question, James, 11:11
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:10
- Re: borel sigma algebra, Jannick Asmus, 11:06
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:06
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:03
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 11:01
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 10:57
- Re: "Power of a number" vs. "to the power of a number", Randy Poe, 10:53
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 10:52
- borel sigma algebra, Bob, 10:51
- Re: Normal families, complex analysis question, David C . Ullrich, 10:47
- Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', casioculture, 10:44
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 10:43
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:38
- Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', casioculture, 10:36
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 10:27
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:26
- Normal families, complex analysis question, James, 10:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:19
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:16
- Re: Angles subtended in an ellipse, David W . Cantrell, 10:15
- Radical Expression For cos(2*pi/37), M.A.Fajjal, 10:10
- Re: "Power of a number" vs. "to the power of a number", John Coleman, 10:09
- Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', David C . Ullrich, 09:58
- "Power of a number" vs. "to the power of a number", Carlos Moreno, 09:56
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, David C . Ullrich, 09:53
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, Igor Khavkine, 09:52
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, David C . Ullrich, 09:49
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, David C . Ullrich, 09:46
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Robert Low, 09:31
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, Jyrki Lahtonen, 09:27
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, David C . Ullrich, 09:20
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, David C . Ullrich, 09:13
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, briggs, 09:07
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, William Elliot, 08:52
- Re: New model for primality test, M.A.Fajjal, 08:51
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, William Elliot, 08:50
- Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:39
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 08:30
- Re: REF is unique to a given matrix, Timothy Murphy, 08:22
- Re: I Don't Like a Definition for Base of a Topology, William Elliot, 08:21
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, Timothy Murphy, 08:18
- Re: locally euclidian and homemorphism, quasi, 08:14
- Re: Self inverse group automorphism, quasi, 08:08
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, David Hartley, 08:04
- locally euclidian and homemorphism, John Smith, 08:02
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 07:52
- Re: New model for primality test, Pubkeybreaker, 07:44
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, David Hartley, 07:34
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 07:34
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, David Hartley, 07:31
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, Pubkeybreaker, 07:28
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 07:25
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, DoronShadmi, 07:24
- Re: I Don't Like a Definition for Base of a Topology, quasi, 07:23
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, DoronShadmi, 07:12
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 07:09
- Re: ONE, John Thingstad, 07:08
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 07:05
- Re: I Don't Like a Definition for Base of a Topology, William Elliot, 06:57
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 06:51
- Re: I Don't Like a Definition for Base of a Topology, José Carlos Santos, 06:44
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 06:32
- I Don't Like a Definition for Base of a Topology, Unchaste, 06:16
- Re: ONE, John Thingstad, 06:09
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 06:07
- Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots, projectautoman, 05:36
- Re: ONE, alan, 05:30
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 05:29
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 05:28
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 05:25
- Self inverse group automorphism, William Elliot, 04:36
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Risto Lankinen, 04:32
- Re: Fermat's little theorem, Larry Hammick, 04:18
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Risto Lankinen, 04:17
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Risto Lankinen, 04:14
- ? determine system matrix, Cheng Cosine, 04:14
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 04:08
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 04:06
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, a_plutonium, 04:05
- Re: sum of two squares, Larry Hammick, 04:04
- Re: old number puzzle, Robert Israel, 03:59
- Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', Dave, 03:56
- Re: Cross products, Robert Low, 03:50
- Re: Cross products, Robert Low, 03:46
- Re: ONE, mskirvin, 03:46
- Re: A variant of house selling problem (optimal stopping), Robert Israel, 03:45
- Re: ONE, alan, 03:44
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Wim Benthem, 03:28
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 03:25
- Re: Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 03:18
- Re: old number puzzle, Han de Bruijn, 03:05
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 03:04
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Gottfried Helms, 03:04
- Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', Barbara Schwarz, 03:01
- Re: Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 02:34
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Gottfried Helms, 02:27
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 02:24
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 02:23
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 02:19
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 02:17
- Re: Maximal homogeneous ideals, quasi, 02:13
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, zuhair, 02:09
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 02:06
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 02:03
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, Robert Israel, 02:01
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 01:53
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 01:51
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 01:49
- Re: Maximal homogeneous ideals, quasi, 01:31
- Re: Cross products, Proginoskes, 01:09
- Re: Maximal homogeneous ideals, joe.shmoe.joe.shmoe, 01:07
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 01:00
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 00:58
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, Proginoskes, 00:54
- Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', Phil Carmody, 00:27
- Re: Need knowledgable people concerning relatively theory... John Baez...?, Jim Black, 00:24
- Re: New model for primality test, Phil Carmody, 00:13
- Re: New model for primality test, Proginoskes, 00:09
- Re: Rankin-Selberg Integral ---What is it?, sam.rosenberg@xxxxxxxxx, 00:07
December 21, 2005
- Re: Cross products, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:17
- Re: Analytic in C - {0}, problem.., quasi, 22:41
- Bertrand's Postulate for AP's, Bart Goddard, 22:39
- A variant of house selling problem (optimal stopping), hopen, 22:38
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:27
- Re: Convergence in L^p question, James, 22:11
- Re: Need knowledgable people concerning relatively theory... John Baez...?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 22:08
- Re: Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Minus XVII, 22:02
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:00
- Re: Prime numbers, Dik T. Winter, 21:57
- Re: Not sure about interpretation of this set notation, Kenneth Bull, 21:52
- Re: Convergence in L^p question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 21:52
- Convergence in L^p question, James, 21:36
- Re: Trumanism and Churchill (not McCarthyism!), Minus XVII, 21:24
- Re: old number puzzle, Keith A. Lewis, 21:17
- Re: Need knowledgable people concerning relatively theory... John Baez...?, fishfry, 21:16
- Analytic in C - {0}, problem.., James, 21:12
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Minus XVII, 21:11
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 21:07
- Re: Not sure about interpretation of this set notation, William Elliot, 21:07
- Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', Chan-Ho Suh, 20:52
- Re: Rankin-Selberg Integral ---What is it?, David Ames, 20:33
- Re: old number puzzle, quasi, 20:32
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, bill, 20:23
- REF is unique to a given matrix, ramakrishnan . kannan, 20:23
- Not sure about interpretation of this set notation, Kenneth Bull, 20:22
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Chip Eastham, 20:15
- sum of two squares, Saint Cad, 20:04
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 20:03
- Re: old number puzzle, quasi, 19:49
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Wim Benthem, 19:46
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 19:42
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 19:39
- Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', Keith A. Lewis, 19:37
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 19:32
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, David Hartley, 19:17
- Re: old number puzzle, Keith A. Lewis, 19:15
- Re: Cross products, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:08
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 18:40
- Re: set convexity, smn, 18:39
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 18:39
- Re: Cross products, Robert Low, 18:28
- Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', Victor Eijkhout, 18:28
- Re: Logic question, smn, 18:26
- Re: Is there an elegant way to represent 3 variables in 2d?, guenther vonKnakspot, 18:17
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 18:14
- Re: Cross products, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:12
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 18:09
- Re: Maximal homogeneous ideals, quasi, 18:08
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 17:54
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 17:47
- Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', Barbara Schwarz, 17:37
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 17:30
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, Barbara Schwarz, 17:28
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 17:23
- Re: old number puzzle, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 17:20
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 17:18
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, WassilyDali, 17:17
- Re: old number puzzle, quasi, 17:14
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 17:13
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 17:09
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 17:07
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 16:58
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 16:57
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 16:51
- Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web', casioculture, 16:44
- Does 2phi(golden proportion)DD = Maximum Surface area of a Moebius?, Dan, 16:43
- Re: Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Bill Strosser, 16:43
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, cbrown, 16:40
- Re: The Truth, Rendall Wojtas, 16:40
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 16:33
- set convexity, Feniks, 16:33
- Re: old number puzzle, Robert Israel, 16:17
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 16:15
- Re: old number puzzle, Narasimham, 16:12
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 16:12
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 16:11
- Need knowledgable people concerning relatively theory... John Baez...?, Paul McCarthy, 15:57
- Re: old number puzzle, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:45
- Re: Logic question, Dan Christensen, 15:40
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:39
- Re: old number puzzle, Robert Israel, 15:35
- Re: Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Richard Miller, 15:26
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, David C. Ullrich, 15:25
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, David C. Ullrich, 15:21
- Re: ONE, Martin Wanvik, 15:15
- Re: Rankin-Selberg Integral ---What is it?, sam.rosenberg@xxxxxxxxx, 15:14
- old number puzzle, Narasimham, 15:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:11
- Re: ONE, Michael Orion, 15:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:01
- Maximal homogeneous ideals, joe.shmoe.joe.shmoe, 14:54
- Re: Integer sequence, Jim Black, 14:43
- Re: Solution to Poisson-Boltzmann equation, Robert Israel, 14:41
- Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 14:38
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 14:38
- Re: riemann, and reciprocals, Dave Rusin, 14:31
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 14:27
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 14:27
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 14:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 14:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 14:23
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 14:19
- Re: A number theortic problem, Gottfried Helms, 14:12
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 14:10
- Re: limit of integrals, The World Wide Wade, 14:04
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, a_plutonium, 13:49
- Re: Is there an elegant way to represent 3 variables in 2d?, alan, 13:43
- A number theortic problem, MuTsun Tsai, 13:40
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 13:39
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 13:36
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 13:33
- Re: super-all-adics, Ross A. Finlayson, 13:29
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:23
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, David Hartley, 13:23
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 13:23
- Re: Is there an elegant way to represent 3 variables in 2d?, quasi, 12:56
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 12:55
- Re: Infinite knight's tour?, Dean Hickerson, 12:55
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 12:54
- Re: Is there an elegant way to represent 3 variables in 2d?, Nathan, 12:45
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 12:44
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 12:43
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:43
- Re: The Truth, Rendall Wojtas, 12:39
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:37
- Is there an elegant way to represent 3 variables in 2d?, Tariq Khokhar, 12:27
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, WassilyDali, 12:15
- Re: My problem (I don't know how to name it), Silas Justiniano, 12:03
- Re: My problem (I don't know how to name it), Randy Poe, 12:01
- Re: Integer sequence, jose, 11:43
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Keith A. Lewis, 11:43
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 11:41
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, nospam, 11:19
- Re: Cyclic groups homomorphism, Toni Lassila, 10:58
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 10:54
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 10:52
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 10:43
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 10:43
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 10:39
- My problem (I don't know how to name it), Silas Justiniano, 10:28
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Wim Benthem, 10:17
- Re: The Truth, Rendall Wojtas, 10:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 10:00
- Re: aperiodic one-tile tilings not on the plane, Daryl McCullough, 09:59
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 09:58
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Randy Poe, 09:57
- Re: riemann, and reciprocals, David C . Ullrich, 09:40
- Re: Cyclic groups homomorphism, David C . Ullrich, 09:38
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, David C . Ullrich, 09:37
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, David C . Ullrich, 09:32
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, David C . Ullrich, 09:23
- Re: super-all-adics, Ken Quirici, 09:18
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Rob Johnson, 09:17
- New model for primality test, M.A.Fajjal, 09:14
- sparse least squares, kemmy, 09:13
- Re: super-all-adics, Ken Quirici, 09:06
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 08:20
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Gottfried Helms, 08:18
- Re: Fermat's little theorem, MuTsun Tsai, 08:16
- Re: riemann, and reciprocals, Martin Wanvik, 08:12
- Re: riemann, and reciprocals, Martin Wanvik, 07:53
- riemann, and reciprocals, SportsNut, 07:41
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:34
- Re: limit of integrals, SportsNut, 07:05
- Re: a question on locally compactness, William Elliot, 06:47
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 06:38
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 06:37
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Gottfried Helms, 06:29
- Cyclic groups homomorphism, anzische, 05:57
- a question on locally compactness, eugene, 05:42
- Re: Solution to Poisson-Boltzmann equation, dkjk, 05:25
- Re: Structure of a semigroup, William Elliot, 05:24
- Re: Solution to Poisson-Boltzmann equation, dkjk, 05:23
- Re: Cross products, Hauke Reddmann, 05:18
- complex systems, andrew . tanenbaum, 05:13
- The indeterminate and the undefined., zuhair, 05:08
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, Proginoskes, 04:49
- Re: Algebraic over field, Jannick Asmus, 04:43
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, Proginoskes, 04:40
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, Proginoskes, 04:32
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, quasi, 04:01
- Re: Fermat's little theorem, quasi, 03:55
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, Phil Carmody, 03:34
- Re: Fermat's little theorem, MuTsun Tsai, 03:20
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, a_plutonium, 03:19
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, a_plutonium, 03:07
- Re: limit of integrals, Rob Johnson, 03:06
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 03:03
- If you can't beat CEOs join them, "Jeremy Golden", 03:03
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, quasi, 02:57
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, a_plutonium, 02:48
- Re: Cross products, Proginoskes, 02:22
- Re: super-all-adics, Proginoskes, 02:13
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Gottfried Helms, 02:04
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, Virgil, 02:02
- Re: # of odd perfect numbers conjecture Re:, Proginoskes, 02:01
- Re: Exponential of a rational function, Bill_42, 01:54
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 01:47
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, Proginoskes, 01:26
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, Proginoskes, 01:19
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, Proginoskes, 01:15
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 01:13
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 01:04
- Re: not stirring sh*t, but victim of stirring, Richard Miller, 01:00
- Re: HELP finding domain of this derivative., Proginoskes, 00:40
- Cross products, Thedoof, 00:39
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 00:33
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 00:18
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 00:12
- Re: Complex Structure R^2->R^2: Is this legal?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 00:11
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 00:10
- Re: Fermat's little theorem, Ted Hwa, 00:01
December 20, 2005
- Re: limit of integrals, William Elliot, 23:58
- Re: super-all-adics, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:57
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:43
- Fermat's little theorem, w . taylor, 23:39
- Exponential of a rational function, WassilyDali, 23:28
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Chip Eastham, 23:16
- Re: Solution to Poisson-Boltzmann equation, Robert Israel, 23:09
- aperiodic one-tile tilings not on the plane, w . taylor, 23:08
- # of odd perfect numbers conjecture Re:, a_plutonium, 23:06
- Re: not stirring sh*t, but victim of stirring, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Multigrid programming, Eric, 22:30
- super-all-adics, Ken Quirici, 22:12
- Re: Representation of analytic functions, Paul Abbott, 21:56
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 21:42
- Re: limit of integrals, mskirvin, 21:40
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Chip Eastham, 21:39
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 21:34
- limit of integrals, SportsNut, 21:18
- Re: E=MC2, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:50
- Re: Transforming a 1st order derivative away, Dave Rusin, 20:49
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, daz, 20:41
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, nospam, 20:37
- Re: not stirring sh*t, but victim of stirring, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 20:37
- Solution to Poisson-Boltzmann equation, dkjk, 20:30
- Re: Transforming a 1st order derivative away, Jules, 20:29
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 20:28
- Re: joint PDF of dependent random variables, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 20:26
- Re: E=MC2, Randy Poe, 20:23
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, Rick Decker, 19:56
- Re: not stirring sh*t, but victim of stirring, Dave Rusin, 19:51
- Re: I found Pi, Andy Spragg, 19:48
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, Barbara Schwarz, 19:41
- Transforming a 1st order derivative away, Peter Jay Salzman, 19:38
- Re: is there a non-commutative division ring which is not a domain?, Chip Eastham, 19:20
- Re: Integer sequence, kingshriek, 19:19
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Jonathan Hoyle, 19:01
- Re: Structure of Primes, adam sageripious, 18:37
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Robert Low, 18:30
- Re: Hyper-Rationals & Standard Irrationals, Jonathan Hoyle, 18:18
- Re: E=MC2, G . Frege, 18:18
- E=MC2, jebrown19, 18:12
- Re: Integer sequence, Jim Black, 18:07
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 18:01
- Re: not stirring sh*t, but victim of stirring, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 17:55
- Re: Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Dave Seaman, 17:55
- Re: HELP finding domain of this derivative., Jules, 17:53
- Re: joint PDF of dependent random variables, mathman, 17:47
- Re: Cantor's paradise of fools, Ross A. Finlayson, 17:40
- Re: not stirring sh*t, but victim of stirring, Ken Pledger, 17:39
- Re: not stirring sh*t, but victim of stirring, gaya . patel, 17:37
- Re: not stirring sh*t, but victim of stirring, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 17:29
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, Phil Carmody, 17:26
- Re: M-set is halluncinatory (was, Re: basic Mandelbrot question), Minus XVII, 17:23
- Re: not stirring sh*t, but victim of stirring, stephen, 17:18
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, David Hartley, 17:06
- Re: Hyper-reals and Cantor's Diagaonal Proof, Math1723, 17:02
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Minus XVII, 17:01
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Minus XVII, 16:58
- Re: not stirring sh*t, but victim of stirring, gaya . patel, 16:56
- Rankin-Selberg Integral ---What is it?, sam . rosenberg, 16:52
- Re: not stirring sh*t, but victim of stirring, Richard Miller, 16:50
- Re: Hyper-Rationals & Standard Irrationals, denis feldmann, 16:37
- not stirring sh*t, but victim of stirring, gaya . patel, 16:37
- aperiodic one-tile tilings not on the plane, Mark Griffith, 16:33
- Re: Prime numbers, M.A.Fajjal, 16:20
- Re: is there a non-commutative division ring which is not a domain?, lataianu bogdan, 16:06
- Re: Integer sequence, JeeBee, 16:04
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Rob Johnson, 15:56
- Hyper-Rationals & Standard Irrationals, Math1723, 15:55
- Re: Square root of a Matrix, Chip Eastham, 15:51
- Re: Logic question, Rob Johnson, 15:41
- Non-Standard Analysis & Other Infinities, Math1723, 15:33
- Re: is there a non-commutative division ring which is not a domain?, Chip Eastham, 15:26
- Re: is there a non-commutative division ring which is not a domain?, lataianu bogdan, 15:25
- Re: is there a non-commutative division ring which is not a domain?, Jon Pula, 15:24
- Re: Square root of a Matrix, fernando revilla, 15:23
- Re: is there a non-commutative division ring which is not a domain?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:22
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:10
- Re: Complex Structure R^2->R^2: Is this legal?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 15:06
- is there a non-commutative division ring which is not a domain?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:03
- Re: example, Robert Israel, 14:50
- Re: Complex Structure R^2->R^2: Is this legal?, Robert Low, 14:48
- Re: Angles subtended in an ellipse, Narasimham, 14:46
- Re: Square root of a Matrix, Randy Poe, 14:40
- Re: Prime numbers, Hanford Carr, 14:40
- Re: Complex Structure R^2->R^2: Is this legal?, Mike Terry, 14:29
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 14:27
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 14:27
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Wim Benthem, 14:14
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, a_plutonium, 14:12
- Re: Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, a_plutonium, 14:03
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Wayne Brown, 14:01
- Re: Representation of analytic functions, Igor Khavkine, 13:57
- Square root of a Matrix, Dr Tam, 13:54
- Re: HELP finding domain of this derivative., Randy Poe, 13:51
- Re: Complex Structure R^2->R^2: Is this legal?, Robert Low, 13:48
- Counterexamples to Riemann Hypothesis, Goldbach and FLT and proof of infinitude of Even primes Re: Infinite-Integers, a_plutonium, 13:45
- Re: Prime numbers, Doug Chatham, 13:34
- Re: how to graph f: R->C , f(x) = sqrt(x), Narcoleptic Insomniac, 13:33
- Re: Complex Structure R^2->R^2: Is this legal?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 13:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, briggs, 13:19
- Re: Prime numbers, Rob Johnson, 13:19
- HELP finding domain of this derivative., R. Colacitti, 13:15
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 13:03
- Re: Exact Values for Pi Related Stuff, I Think....?, Dave Rusin, 13:02
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Gottfried Helms, 12:59
- Re: how to graph f: R->C , f(x) = sqrt(x), Narcoleptic Insomniac, 12:55
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 12:51
- Re: central forces-, JEMebius, 12:33
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 12:22
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 12:21
- Integer sequence, jose, 12:11
- Re: Complex Structure R^2->R^2: Is this legal?, Randy Poe, 12:10
- Re: complete category, Marc Olschok, 12:06
- Re: orthonormal columns-, JEMebius, 12:06
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 12:02
- Re: order of magnitute, oercim, 11:50
- Re: order of magnitute, oercim, 11:25
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 11:20
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 11:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:44
- Complex Structure R^2->R^2: Is this legal?, Hatto von Aquitanien, 10:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:25
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Terry, 10:11
- Re: Prime numbers, William Elliot, 09:52
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, David Hartley, 09:49
- Re: Prime numbers, William Elliot, 09:36
- Re: Prime numbers, José Carlos Santos, 09:34
- Re: differentiablity and deribative, Carlos Moreno, 09:18
- Re: Prime numbers, Timothy Murphy, 09:12
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, David C . Ullrich, 09:12
- Re: T^2 + I = O, David C . Ullrich, 09:09
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, David M Einstein, 09:06
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Ken Quirici, 09:00
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Keith A. Lewis, 08:55
- Prime numbers, M.A.Fajjal, 08:48
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 08:44
- Re: central forces, William Elliot, 08:39
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Keith A. Lewis, 08:39
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, David M Einstein, 08:36
- number of different grid networks, JeeBee, 08:30
- Re: complete category, Kees, 08:23
- Re: T^2 + I = O, Kees, 08:20
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 08:15
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 08:04
- Re: Representation of analytic functions, conesetter, 07:51
- Re: Exact Values for Pi Related Stuff, I Think....?, John Bailey, 07:50
- Re: central forces, Tony, 07:48
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, denis feldmann, 07:28
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, denis feldmann, 07:22
- joint PDF of dependent random variables, gans1973, 07:21
- Re: example, gilevgi, 07:15
- Re: PGL(2,p), Timothy Murphy, 07:07
- Re: Complex numbers without reference to reals, Robert Low, 06:58
- Re: Quotient Rings, Bill Dubuque, 06:56
- Re: Quotient Rings, Bill Dubuque, 06:48
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Andy, 06:22
- Re: Tesellating Circles, Keith A. Lewis, 06:04
- Re: inner product space, G. A. Edgar, 05:46
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, G. A. Edgar, 05:44
- Re: Addition Law and K*P for Montgomery-form Curves, Ža\\/b, 05:36
- Re: Tesellating Circles, Ian Parker, 05:29
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Gottfried Helms, 05:28
- number of different grid networks, JeeBee, 04:54
- Re: The Truth, Han . deBruijn, 04:40
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han . deBruijn, 04:38
- Re: Show that Z_m^* is group, Bill Dubuque, 04:08
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 03:55
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 03:43
- Re: Complex numbers without reference to reals, Proginoskes, 03:42
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 03:41
- Re: f(x)=x, alainverghote, 03:41
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 03:39
- Re: Angles subtended in an ellipse, Virgil, 03:33
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 03:32
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 03:28
- Re: T^2 + I = O, Yo Wang, 03:26
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 03:24
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 03:22
- Re: differentiablity and deribative, Robert Low, 03:15
- Angles subtended in an ellipse, Ajit, 03:10
- Re: Continuity of function, Robert Low, 03:08
- Re: Complex numbers without reference to reals, Robert Low, 03:06
- Re: Algebraic over field, Bill Dubuque, 03:03
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 03:01
- differentiablity and deribative, disanalysis, 03:01
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Robert Low, 02:58
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 02:45
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 02:24
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 02:23
- Re: Complex numbers without reference to reals, Proginoskes, 02:21
- Re: complete category, No One, 02:20
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Proginoskes, 02:20
- Re: Exact Values for Pi Related Stuff, I Think....?, fishfry, 02:12
- Re: Translating a compond statement into a symbolic form, William Elliot, 02:10
- Re: central forces, William Elliot, 02:08
- Addition Law and K*P for Montgomery-form Curves, Ža\\/b, 01:53
- Structure of a semigroup, Riivo Must, 01:47
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, William Elliot, 01:39
- Re: how to graph f: R->C , f(x) = sqrt(x), William Elliot, 01:22
- Re: Logic question, Daniel W. Johnson, 01:19
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 01:16
- Re: Complex numbers without reference to reals, anon1, 00:42
- Translating a compond statement into a symbolic form, yakuza, 00:23
- Translating a compond statement into a symbolic form, yakuza, 00:23
- Re: Continuity of function, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 00:21
- Re: Line on a closed and bounded polyhedron, Narasimham, 00:15
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 00:01
December 19, 2005
- Continuity of function, Steve, 23:57
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 23:41
- Re: Rook Mathematics, Jim Black, 23:39
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 23:38
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Chip Eastham, 23:32
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Gottfried Helms, 23:32
- Re: Complex numbers without reference to reals, Proginoskes, 23:30
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Gottfried Helms, 23:28
- Re: ? solving max function, Proginoskes, 23:27
- Re: Exact Values for Pi Related Stuff, I Think....?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 23:04
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Gottfried Helms, 23:03
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 22:48
- Re: Rook Mathematics, Jim Black, 22:44
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, i . love . jeevitha, 22:43
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 22:33
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 22:32
- Re: Exact Values for Pi Related Stuff, I Think....?, Terry, 22:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:54
- Exact Values for Pi Related Stuff, I Think....?, rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx, 21:51
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 21:45
- Re: Representation of analytic functions, Lee Rudolph, 21:41
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Starbles, 21:14
- Re: PGL(2,p), DaTa66, 20:58
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, Rick Decker, 20:48
- Re: ONE, alan, 20:33
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, martin cohen, 20:23
- Re: PGL(2,p), Timothy Murphy, 20:23
- Re: Logic question, Daniel W. Johnson, 19:56
- Re: ONE, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:40
- Re: Line on a closed and bounded polyhedron, ram, 19:32
- Re: Tesellating Circles, Adam Burley, 19:31
- Re: ONE, Ken Pledger, 19:29
- Re: Line on a closed and bounded polyhedron, ram, 19:28
- Re: multiplication, Ken Pledger, 19:19
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, John Porcella, 19:09
- Re: Line on a closed and bounded polyhedron, Narasimham, 18:59
- Re: Logic question, david petry, 18:57
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, i . love . jeevitha, 18:39
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 18:34
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Terry, 18:27
- Re: inverse and derivative of a function, Narasimham, 18:25
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Chip Eastham, 18:23
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:19
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, i . love . jeevitha, 18:17
- Re: proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 18:15
- Re: Line on a closed and bounded polyhedron, alan, 18:14
- proof that inverse of continuous function is also continuous?, i . love . jeevitha, 18:04
- Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Chip Eastham, 17:52
- Line on a closed and bounded polyhedron, ram, 17:50
- Re: how to graph f: R->C , f(x) = sqrt(x), David Park, 17:49
- Re: Gamma function, Rob Johnson, 17:41
- Re: coupled ODE solution (almost), Robert Israel, 17:38
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 17:31
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 17:19
- Re: Gamma function, rancid moth, 17:13
- hyperarea of parts of the hypersphere surface, CharlieL, 17:09
- Re: T^2 + I = O, Jannick Asmus, 17:02
- Re: coupled ODE solution (almost), rancid moth, 16:59
- Re: inner product space, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 16:57
- T^2 + I = O, Yo Wang, 16:42
- Christmas Tree Number Triangle, Leroy Quet, 16:33
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Kees, 16:29
- Re: how to graph f: R->C , f(x) = sqrt(x), W. Dale Hall, 16:04
- Re: Gamma function, Jannick Asmus, 15:57
- Re: inverse and derivative of a function, Robert Low, 15:55
- Re: Probability problem., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:51
- Re: Short undergraduate analysis question, Valeriu Anisiu, 15:43
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory, Madwia, 15:34
- Enumeration:A Game Of Coprimality On A Grid, Leroy Quet, 15:31
- Re: inverse and derivative of a function, Narasimham, 15:30
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 15:29
- Re: central forces, Robert Low, 15:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:23
- Re: inner product space, Robert Low, 15:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:05
- Re: Gamma function, G. A. Edgar, 14:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:57
- Re: inner product space, David C. Ullrich, 14:57
- Two envelopes and game theory, LordBeotian, 14:50
- Re: Which one is bigger?, oercim, 14:49
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:48
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:46
- Re: coupled ODE solution (almost), [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 14:45
- Re: The Helsinki Code, Part 3, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:45
- Re: Gamma function, Daryl McCullough, 14:43
- Which one is bigger?, oercim, 14:42
- Re: PGL(2,p), DaTa66, 14:42
- Re: example, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 14:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:39
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 14:36
- central forces, Tony, 14:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:35
- Re: PGL(2,p), Timothy Murphy, 14:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, briggs, 14:33
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 14:26
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, Gottfried Helms, 14:21
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:20
- Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!, GarryDenke, 14:18
- Re: Representation of analytic functions, Igor Khavkine, 14:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:15
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:14
- Re: Representation of analytic functions, Igor Khavkine, 14:06
- Re: Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 14:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:01
- Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Gottfried Helms, 14:00
- how to graph f: R->C , f(x) = sqrt(x), Kobu, 13:57
- parallel transports and curvature, eduardomdiaz, 13:56
- MFLT conjecture, Richard Miller, 13:55
- Gamma function, Jules, 13:37
- Re: Rook Mathematics, denis feldmann, 13:24
- Re: Vector space real sequences, Jules, 13:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 13:15
- Re: Singleton codomain -- how to write, Marc Olschok, 13:13
- Re: PGL(2,p), DaTa66, 13:11
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:06
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:57
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 12:52
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 12:50
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:49
- Re: Rook Mathematics, Marian Minar, 12:46
- Re: Complex numbers without reference to reals, Christopher J. Henrich, 12:43
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 12:43
- Re: Logic question, Norm Dresner, 12:43
- You are nominated for a Bachelors, "Beatrice Connell", 12:42
- Re: orthonormal columns, Paul Sperry, 12:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, briggs, 12:23
- GRAVITATION EXPLAINED, ACE, 12:10
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:10
- Re: ONE, zuhair, 12:03
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 12:02
- Re: domain, g_casini, 12:01
- Re: series help, mathedman, 11:56
- Re: ONE, mathedman, 11:53
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:42
- Re: Short undergraduate analysis question, David C . Ullrich, 11:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 11:36
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 11:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:19
- Re: Points on elliptic curves, foaud167, 11:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:53
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:53
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:29
- Re: why are some limit laws only valid for "n is a positive integer"?, Herman Rubin, 10:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:08
- Re: George Boole at the Restaurant, Gaspard Petit, 10:06
- Re: Tesellating Circles, Keith A. Lewis, 10:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:56
- Re: George Boole at the Restaurant, Gaspard Petit, 09:44
- Re: Logic question, Ryan Reich, 09:36
- Re: Tesellating Circles, Ian Parker, 09:10
- Re: Probability problem., The Qurqirish Dragon, 09:01
- Re: Logic question, Dave Seaman, 08:54
- Re: Not a 'one of many ...' mathematical element, DoronShadmi, 08:49
- Tesellating Circles, Adam Burley, 08:32
- Re: Logic question, Torkel Franzen, 08:24
- Call for Papers: CSC'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06), A. M. G. Solo, 08:19
- Re: Logic question, Ryan Reich, 08:18
- series help, Naren, 08:06
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 08:00
- Short undergraduate analysis question, trivecteur, 07:35
- Re: orthonormal columns, SportsNut, 07:20
- Re: Representation of analytic functions, Lee Rudolph, 07:20
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 07:13
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 07:13
- Re: Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, David C . Ullrich, 06:47
- ONE, zuhair, 06:44
- Re: The set of All sets, zuhair, 06:42
- Re: convergence question, David C . Ullrich, 06:41
- Re: convergence question, David C . Ullrich, 06:41
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 06:12
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, zuhair, 06:11
- Re: inverse and derivative of a function, alainverghote, 05:58
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 19, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:41
- Re: Logic question, Robert J. Kolker, 05:23
- Re: Logic question, Keith Ramsay, 04:45
- Writing a textbook that consolidates all the Adics and getting rid of base dependency; call them Infinite Integers and do they form a Field, a_plutonium, 04:16
- Re: inner product space, Robert Low, 04:09
- Re: inner product space, Robert Low, 04:07
- Re: inner product space, Robert Low, 03:59
- Re: help proving that limit of piecewise function DNE, Robert Low, 03:49
- Re: Points on elliptic curves, Jyrki Lahtonen, 03:15
- Re: coupled ODE solution (almost), Robert Israel, 03:07
- Re: Probability problem., Rob Johnson, 03:00
- Number Of Integer Solutions To Quartic, Steve Schooler, 02:49
- Re: Logic question, Rob Johnson, 02:46
- Re: inverse and derivative of a function, Robert Israel, 02:42
- Complex numbers without reference to reals, Jim Black, 02:38
- Elite watches - LOW price!, "Steven A. Norman", 02:17
- Re: Isometric deformations of the two sphere? Seems nonintuitive to me, Narasimham, 02:14
- example, gilevgi, 02:08
- Re: inner product space, Ronald Bruck, 02:02
- Re: Rook Mathematics, Jim Black, 01:19
- Re: ? solving max function, Cheng Cosine, 01:18
- freedom of science, wojtekfialkiewicz, 01:04
- Rook Mathematics, Marian Minar, 00:55
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 00:54
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 00:43
- Re: George Boole at the Restaurant, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 00:40
- Re: orthonormal columns, Paul Sperry, 00:33
- Re: P,L,U, partial pivoting, linear algebra, Paul Sperry, 00:32
- Re: ? solving max function, Proginoskes, 00:29
- Re: Proof that Field theory can never apply to Riem or Loba geom and that it is confined to only Reals and Eucl geom Re:, a_plutonium, 00:22
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 00:21
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, fishfry, 00:08
- coupled ODE solution (almost), rancid moth, 00:08
December 18, 2005
- Re: Probability problem., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 23:59
- Re: I think we don't need the 0 !!!, quasi, 23:53
- Re: Singleton codomain -- how to write, quasi, 23:47
- Re: order of magnitute, Chip Eastham, 23:36
- Re: Logic question, Dave Seaman, 23:14
- Re: Singleton codomain -- how to write, Soren Kuula, 22:54
- multiplication, Ron Carmichael, 22:49
- Vector space real sequences, Albert, 22:48
- Re: Logic question, Ryan Reich, 22:47
- ? solving max function, Cheng Cosine, 22:45
- Re: inner product space, Virgil, 22:40
- Re: Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, Justin, 22:39
- Re: domain, Mkajuma, 22:03
- Re: Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, Rouben Rostamian, 21:58
- Re: inner product space, SportsNut, 21:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 21:46
- Does exponential growth require a constant rate of growth? No!, Couttsie, 21:43
- orthonormal columns, SportsNut, 21:38
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 21:37
- Re: Probability problem., bill, 21:30
- Re: Logic question, smn, 21:21
- Re: Linearly independent, Albert, 21:07
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 21:04
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 21:04
- inner product space, SportsNut, 21:02
- P,L,U, partial pivoting, linear algebra, SusanP, 20:58
- Re: Proof that Field theory can never apply to Riem or Loba geom and that it is confined to only Reals and Eucl geom Re:, Proginoskes, 20:46
- Re: The non-composed and infinitely long ..., fishfry, 20:40
- Re: convergence question, asdf, 20:40
- inverse and derivative of a function, Gary Weselle, 20:36
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, casioculture, 20:33
- Linearly independent, Albert, 20:32
- Re: A first-order PDE, Raymond Manzoni, 20:13
- Re: I think we don't need the 0 !!!, Proginoskes, 20:12
- Re: Logic question, smn, 20:03
- Re: help proving that limit of piecewise function DNE, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:49
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, quasi, 19:45
- Re: help proving that limit of piecewise function DNE, mskirvin, 19:44
- Re: Probability problem., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:43
- Re: Mathmatical expression for graph?, Russ, 19:42
- Re: domain, Robert Israel, 19:31
- Re: Probability problem., bill, 19:22
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, david petry, 19:21
- The non-composed and infinitly long ...(please ignore the last 2 versions), DoronShadmi, 18:35
- Re: help proving that limit of piecewise function DNE, R. Colacitti, 18:29
- Re: solving quadratic congruences, Christian, 18:28
- help proving that limit of piecewise function DNE, R. Colacitti, 18:27
- Re: convergence question, Joseph Fagan, 18:25
- The non-composed and infinitly long (a corrected version), DoronShadmi, 18:22
- Link between Fermat's Last Theorem and String theory, john_ramsden, 18:19
- The non-composed and infinitely long ..., DoronShadmi, 18:16
- Re: domain, Mkajuma, 18:14
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, DoronShadmi, 17:47
- Re: Singleton codomain -- how to write, quasi, 17:46
- Re: Laplace Inverse of s/(s+a), [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 17:35
- Re: domain, Robert Israel, 17:31
- Re: Completeness of C_o(X), Robert Israel, 17:26
- Newton and the best neighborhood, Gary Weselle, 17:24
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 16:53
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, Kees, 16:34
- Re: Number theory, Robert Israel, 16:32
- Re: A first-order PDE, Robert Low, 16:25
- domain, Anita, 16:24
- forgery of my name by Aaron Shearer, identity theft and an abuse of Yahoo.com, a_plutonium, 16:22
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, cbrown, 16:20
- Re: The Truth, Han . deBruijn, 16:10
- Re: Probability problem., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:09
- Re: inverse and derivative of a function, Narasimham, 16:05
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han . deBruijn, 16:04
- Re: Singleton codomain -- how to write, fishfry, 16:03
- Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, Peace, decency, truth and friendship, 16:00
- A first-order PDE, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:56
- Re: Representation of analytic functions, Hero, 15:45
- Proof that Field theory can never apply to Riem or Loba geom and that it is confined to only Reals and Eucl geom Re:, a_plutonium, 15:39
- Re: straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Archimedes Plutonuim, 15:13
- Completeness of C_o(X), Tommi Höynälänmaa, 15:03
- Re: Logic question, Dave Seaman, 15:01
- Re: Logic question, Dave Seaman, 14:56
- Re: Quotient Rings, Dave Rusin, 14:54
- Re: Logic question, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:50
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Andy, 14:45
- Re: Logic question, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:42
- Re: L^1(R) problem, Robert Low, 14:41
- Re: order of magnitute, oercim, 14:37
- Singleton codomain -- how to write, Soren Kuula, 14:34
- Re: sort of difference equation, Virgil, 14:33
- Re: Newton and the best neighborhood, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:05
- Re: sort of difference equation, Jim Black, 14:03
- Re: L^1(R) problem, Julien Santini, 14:01
- Re: L^1(R) problem, Julien Santini, 14:01
- Re: Newton and the best neighborhood, Chip Eastham, 14:01
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, zuhair, 13:48
- L^1(R) problem, g . luperini, 13:37
- Re: order of magnitute, Chip Eastham, 13:21
- Re: Logic question, Torkel Franzen, 13:17
- Re: $10 000 prise the new conjecture, john_ramsden, 13:03
- Re: Logic question, Toni Lassila, 12:52
- convergence question, asdf, 12:48
- Re: Logic question, Daniel W. Johnson, 12:41
- Re: is it true? plz help, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 12:17
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 12:12
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 12:08
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 11:45
- Re: inverse and derivative of a function, Solbek, 11:38
- Re: Logic question, Torkel Franzen, 11:38
- Re: Logic question, Dave Seaman, 11:20
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 11:20
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 11:12
- Re: $10 000 prise the new conjecture, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:11
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 11:09
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 11:09
- Re: Logic question, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:30
- Re: Representation of analytic functions, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 10:23
- Re: Logic question, Torkel Franzen, 10:17
- Re: Logic question, Robert J. Kolker, 10:14
- Re: Logic question, Torkel Franzen, 10:06
- Re: order of magnitute, oercim, 10:06
- Re: sort of difference equation, JeeBee, 09:56
- Re: Logic question, Rob Johnson, 09:51
- Packinon 0.04 Released, dick_fischbeck, 09:23
- Re: is it true? plz help, William Elliot, 09:21
- Re: is it true? plz help, Robert Low, 08:55
- Re: Representation of analytic functions, David C . Ullrich, 08:05
- Re: about Rudin, David C . Ullrich, 07:55
- Re: Algebraic over field, William Elliot, 07:52
- Re: Logic question, William Elliot, 07:47
- Re: Algebraic over field, Jannick Asmus, 07:45
- Re: Algebraic over field, William Elliot, 07:39
- Re: sort of difference equation, William Elliot, 07:28
- Re: Algebraic over field, Jannick Asmus, 07:25
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:24
- Re: Logic question, Jannick Asmus, 07:21
- Re: Algebraic over field, Tanja, 07:15
- Re: Ring of polynomial, Tanja, 07:11
- Re: Logic question, William Elliot, 06:43
- A Segment's Edge and a Point, DoronShadmi, 06:36
- Re: is it true? plz help, William Elliot, 06:30
- sort of difference equation, JeeBee, 06:24
- Aha! Found out about manifold stripings - "Foliations", john_ramsden, 06:22
- Re: Algebraic over field, William Elliot, 06:19
- Re: Ring of polynomial, mskirvin, 06:17
- Re: Logic question, smn, 06:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 06:11
- $10 000 prise the new conjecture, john_ramsden, 06:07
- Re: Logic question, Robert J. Kolker, 06:04
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, DoronShadmi, 05:55
- Re: Quotient Rings, mskirvin, 05:41
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, zuhair, 05:31
- Re: Logic question, Rob Johnson, 05:09
- Re: Find a Ring, Tanja, 05:02
- Re: Show that Z_m^* is group, Tanja, 04:57
- Re: Algebraic over field, Tanja, 04:55
- Re: Find a Ring, mskirvin, 04:53
- straightening-out the ill-defined Field theory Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 04:53
- Re: Find a Ring, Arturo Magidin, 04:50
- Re: Representation of analytic functions, smn, 04:45
- Re: Algebraic over field, mskirvin, 04:43
- Re: Show that Z_m^* is group, Rob Johnson, 04:38
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 04:29
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 04:27
- Algebraic over field, Tanja, 04:26
- Show that Z_m^* is group, Tanja, 04:25
- Ring of polynomial, Tanja, 04:22
- Find a Ring, Tanja, 04:20
- Re: Logic question, Jannick Asmus, 04:12
- Re: Logic question, Jannick Asmus, 04:07
- Re: Logic question, Rob Johnson, 04:00
- Re: is it true? plz help, Robert Low, 03:59
- Re: is it true? plz help, Robert Low, 03:57
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, DoronShadmi, 03:54
- Re: is it true? plz help, quasi, 03:54
- Re: Quotient Rings, quasi, 03:49
- Re: Logic question, Rob Johnson, 03:37
- Re: Logic question, William Elliot, 03:35
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 03:25
- Re: Logic question, Rob Johnson, 03:16
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 03:00
- Re: Quotient Rings, William Elliot, 02:53
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 02:37
- Re: Logic question, José Carlos Santos, 02:36
- Re: I think we don't need the 0 !!!, Jitendra Rayala, 02:30
- Re: Logic question, William Elliot, 02:29
- Re: Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 02:26
- Re: Logic question, Peter Webb, 02:17
- Re: is it true? plz help, William Elliot, 02:17
- Re: Number theory, Randall, 02:09
- Logic question, Peter Fairbrother, 02:08
- Re: Number theory, Virgil, 02:08
- Re: Number theory, Joshua Zelinsky, 02:07
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, zuhair, 02:05
- is it true? plz help, VijaKhara, 02:05
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 02:03
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 01:57
- Re: inverse and derivative of a function, Virgil, 01:55
- Number theory, sudhanva, 01:51
- Quotient Rings, Zack123, 01:38
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 01:27
- Re: cosh, Narasimham, 00:17
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 00:10
December 17, 2005
- Re: Probability problem., Rob Johnson, 23:03
- Re: Probability problem., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:40
- Re: Laplace Inverse of s/(s+a), Heid The Baw, 22:15
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 21:53
- Re: why are some limit laws only valid for "n is a positive integer"?, gaya . patel, 21:50
- Re: Mathmatical expression for graph?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:41
- Re: why are some limit laws only valid for "n is a positive integer"?, Proginoskes, 21:40
- Re: Mathmatical expression for graph?, Proginoskes, 21:37
- Re: Probability problem., Robert Israel, 21:32
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 21:28
- Re: Probability problem., Rob Johnson, 21:22
- Re: why are some limit laws only valid for "n is a positive integer"?, gaya . patel, 21:07
- Mathmatical expression for graph?, Russ, 20:50
- Re: composition of transformation, Ryan Reich, 20:31
- Re: why are some limit laws only valid for "n is a positive integer"?, Proginoskes, 20:18
- Re: order of magnitute, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:59
- Re: why are some limit laws only valid for "n is a positive integer"?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:54
- Re: I think we don't need the 0 !!!, john_ramsden, 19:28
- The Local and the Non-local, DoronShadmi, 19:26
- Re: Zuhair's Circles (please ignore my previous post), DoronShadmi, 19:15
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Dave L. Renfro, 19:10
- Re: differentiability on closed interval [a,b], Luke Wu, 18:53
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, DoronShadmi, 18:47
- Re: why are some limit laws only valid for "n is a positive integer"?, gaya . patel, 18:42
- Re: solving quadratic congruences, Don Reble, 18:40
- Re: limit of a limit, gaya . patel, 18:31
- Re: order of magnitute, oercim, 18:26
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:24
- Re: Cantor's paradise of fools, Ross A. Finlayson, 18:04
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:01
- solving quadratic congruences, Christian, 17:53
- Re: I think we don't need the 0 !!!, Torkel Franzen, 17:52
- Re: order of magnitute, Chip Eastham, 17:50
- Re: Probability problem., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:28
- Re: Simple question on permutations, Marc Olschok, 17:25
- Points on elliptic curves, foaud167, 17:24
- Re: Cantor's paradise of fools, david petry, 17:04
- Re: I think we don't need the 0 !!!, The World Wide Wade, 16:45
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, zuhair, 16:38
- Re: order of magnitute, oercim, 16:28
- Re: order of magnitute, oercim, 16:27
- Re: Simple question on permutations, hujin, 16:20
- Re: why are some limit laws only valid for "n is a positive integer"?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 16:16
- Re: cosh, Ronald Bruck, 16:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 16:07
- Re: Simple question on permutations, Marc Olschok, 16:04
- Re: cosh, Narasimham, 15:43
- Re: composition of transformation, Robert Low, 15:34
- Simple question on permutations, hujin, 15:33
- Re: Intro to Analysis by William Wade - opinions?, Luke Wu, 15:31
- Re: how to factor a^n - b^n, Virgil, 15:31
- Re: question about weighted vertex cover algorithm, bill, 15:06
- composition of transformation, vsgdp, 15:05
- Re: about Rudin, Robert Low, 14:41
- Re: how to factor a^n - b^n, gaya . patel, 14:38
- Re: Proper classes, G . Frege, 14:37
- Re: about Rudin, Robert Low, 14:33
- why are some limit laws only valid for "n is a positive integer"?, gaya . patel, 14:31
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, DoronShadmi, 14:30
- Re: Proper classes, zuhair, 14:28
- Re: about Rudin, Ronald Bruck, 14:26
- Re: inverse squared type curve, Narasimham, 14:09
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, casioculture, 14:04
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 13:21
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Keith, 13:04
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, zuhair, 13:01
- Re: Proper classes, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:50
- Re: Proper classes, G . Frege, 12:41
- Re: Proper classes, G . Frege, 12:39
- Representation of analytic functions, Julien Santini, 12:35
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 12:33
- Re: M-set is halluncinatory (was, Re: basic Mandelbrot question), echo, 12:27
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 12:22
- Re: Proper classes, zuhair, 12:21
- Re: Dedekind Domain, Arturo Magidin, 12:18
- Re: Proper classes, David R Tribble, 12:03
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, zuhair, 12:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 11:55
- Re: inverse squared type curve, TCL, 11:48
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Ivor Jones, 11:47
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 11:40
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 11:34
- Re: Proper classes, David R Tribble, 11:23
- Re: Quantum Pi, David R Tribble, 11:11
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, G . Frege, 11:09
- Re: I think we don't need the 0 !!!, Vladimir Vassilevsky, 11:02
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, David R Tribble, 11:01
- Re: order of magnitute, karl, 10:57
- inverse squared type curve, Narasimham, 10:54
- Re: Particle physics refutes intelligent design, Kees, 10:42
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 10:23
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 10:22
- Re: Dedekind Domain, Timothy Murphy, 10:10
- OT I think we don't need the 0 !!!, Jerry Avins, 09:33
- Re: I think we don't need the 0 !!!, John E. Hadstate, 09:33
- Re: Banach space whose dual is c_0, David C . Ullrich, 09:17
- Re: Banach space whose dual is c_0, David C . Ullrich, 09:14
- Re: about Rudin, David C . Ullrich, 09:11
- Re: about Rudin, David C . Ullrich, 09:08
- Re: Monadic-Mathematics (a corrected post), DoronShadmi, 08:51
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Andy Luckman (AJL Electronics), 08:48
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Andy Luckman (AJL Electronics), 08:47
- Re: limit of an equation, Carl Parkes, 08:43
- Re: order of magnitute, oercim, 08:42
- order of magnitute, oercim, 08:35
- Line circle intersection in 2D, Peter S., 08:34
- Re: Proper classes, Jesse F. Hughes, 08:31
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:26
- Re: Proper classes, Nath Rao, 07:52
- Re: Monadic-Mathematics (a corrected post), DoronShadmi, 07:31
- Re: Monadic-Mathematics (a corrected post), DoronShadmi, 07:16
- Re: Proper classes, Jeremy Boden, 07:07
- Re: Hyper-reals and Cantor's Diagaonal Proof, G. A. Edgar, 06:40
- Particle physics refutes intelligent design, Dr Tim, 06:39
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, DoronShadmi, 06:27
- Re: Jacobian problem in dimension 2 solved, Lee Rudolph, 06:23
- Re: Descending Chain Condition, William Elliot, 06:22
- Re: Ring theory question, Bill Dubuque, 05:58
- Re: The Truth, Kees, 05:46
- Re: a simpler, easier kalman filter, harry hotcakes III, 04:21
- Re: Quantum Pi, Heid The Baw, 04:20
- Re: are differential geometry and topology useful?, Heid The Baw, 04:15
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, Ross A. Finlayson, 03:39
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 03:35
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, zuhair, 03:32
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, zuhair, 03:03
- Re: Zuhair's circles, zuhair, 03:00
- Re: I think we don't need the 0 !!!, Torkel Franzen, 02:32
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 02:32
- Re: I think we don't need the 0 !!!, rbj, 02:19
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 01:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 01:41
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Ross A. Finlayson, 01:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 01:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 01:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 00:42
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 00:30
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 00:17
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, cbrown, 00:06
- Re: Probability problem., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 00:06
December 16, 2005
- Re: PC exicutable of Ocatve?, Mike Kent, 23:47
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 23:42
- Re: are differential geometry and topology useful?, quasi, 23:20
- Re: Banach space whose dual is c_0, smn, 23:04
- Re: I think we don't need the 0 !!!, Jim Heckman, 22:46
- Re: I think we don't need the 0 !!!, quasi, 22:46
- Re: Jacubian problem in 2D solved, quasi, 22:37
- Re: I found Pi, Andy Spragg, 22:27
- Re: Jacubian problem in 2D solved, L . Andrew Campbell, 22:20
- I think we don't need the 0 !!!, Oliver Wen, 21:55
- Re: Hyper-reals and Cantor's Diagaonal Proof, Jonathan Hoyle, 21:49
- Re: Monadic-Mathematics (a corrected post), G . Frege, 21:43
- Hyper-reals and Cantor's Diagaonal Proof, Math1723, 21:42
- Re: Monadic-Mathematics (a corrected post), G . Frege, 21:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:34
- Re: Intro to Analysis by William Wade - opinions?, deniz . bahar, 21:28
- Re: 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, Dave Rusin, 21:17
- Re: Monadic-Mathematics (a corrected post), mskirvin, 20:52
- Re: Probability problem., quasi, 20:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 20:43
- Re: Monadic-Mathematics (a corrected post), DoronShadmi, 19:49
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Ivor Jones, 19:41
- Re: Monadic-Mathematics (a corrected post), G . Frege, 19:12
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, DoronShadmi, 19:07
- Re: Probability problem., Michael Harrington, 18:41
- Monadic-Mathematics (a corrected post), DoronShadmi, 18:29
- Re: Cantor's paradise of fools, david petry, 18:24
- Re: 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, Robert Israel, 18:20
- Re: x^(2/4) = x^(1/2) --- don't think so!-, JEMebius, 17:57
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, Kees, 17:32
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, Someonekicked, 16:57
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 16:29
- Re: Probability problem., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:23
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Robert Low, 16:22
- Re: 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, Dave Rusin, 16:18
- Re: Monadic-Mathematics, DoronShadmi, 16:16
- Re: Monadic-Mathematics, DoronShadmi, 16:10
- Re: A point and a line in 3D space, bumbala, 16:08
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 15:54
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, Kees, 15:51
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, Kees, 15:45
- Re: The Truth, Kees, 15:42
- Probability problem., George, 15:41
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 15:40
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, Someonekicked, 15:38
- Re: Theoretical/Rigorous precalculus textbook recommendation(s), Dave L. Renfro, 15:32
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, Someonekicked, 15:30
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 15:28
- Re: Coefficient in Laurent series, The World Wide Wade, 15:21
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 15:14
- Re: A point and a line in 3D space, The World Wide Wade, 15:11
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 15:10
- Re: Klein Bottle question, Lee Rudolph, 15:05
- Re: Theoretical/Rigorous precalculus textbook recommendation(s), gaya . patel, 15:01
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han . deBruijn, 15:00
- Re: Klein Bottle question, W. Dale Hall, 14:56
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, zuhair, 14:56
- Re: The Truth, Han . deBruijn, 14:55
- Re: two similar probability questions?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:54
- Re: 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, M.A.Fajjal, 14:54
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Ivor Jones, 14:49
- Re: Zuhair's Circles, Kees, 14:42
- Re: The Truth, Kees, 14:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:36
- Re: The Truth, Kees, 14:33
- Re: Theoretical/Rigorous precalculus textbook recommendation(s), gaya . patel, 14:32
- Re: two similar probability questions?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:28
- Zuhair's Circles, zuhair, 14:19
- Re: A point and a line in 3D space, Philippe 92, 14:16
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 14:08
- Re: two similar probability questions?, yuanhp_china, 14:03
- Re: about Rudin, Russell, 13:56
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Jeremy Boden, 13:50
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 13:44
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Robert Low, 13:22
- Re: Monadic-Mathematics, Chip Eastham, 12:58
- Re: A point and a line in 3D space, Randy Poe, 12:55
- Re: A point and a line in 3D space, bumbala, 12:49
- Re: Monadic-Mathematics, Kees, 12:47
- Re: Context Free Grammar: #a = #b + 1, Helmut Richter, 12:43
- Re: A point and a line in 3D space, Randy Poe, 12:37
- Context Free Grammar: #a = #b + 1, HaveFun, 12:35
- Re: A point and a line in 3D space, bumbala, 12:29
- Re: A point and a line in 3D space, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 12:27
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:25
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 12:23
- Re: A point and a line in 3D space, Randy Poe, 12:10
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 12:08
- Re: A point and a line in 3D space, Randy Poe, 12:08
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:07
- Re: A point and a line in 3D space, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 12:05
- Re: Theoretical/Rigorous precalculus textbook recommendation(s), Dave L. Renfro, 12:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:03
- Re: Theoretical/Rigorous precalculus textbook recommendation(s), Dave L. Renfro, 11:59
- A point and a line in 3D space, bumbala, 11:53
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:51
- Re: Klein Bottle question, Tony, 11:47
- Re: Klein Bottle question, AmmonRa, 11:36
- Re: about Rudin, sengal . kiru, 11:31
- Re: Limit points, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 11:24
- Re: The Truth, Kees, 11:20
- Re: The Truth, Kees, 11:15
- Re: The Truth, Kees, 11:14
- Re: Descending Chain Condition, Arturo Magidin, 10:59
- Re: about Rudin, Dave L. Renfro, 10:55
- Re: cosh, Philippe 92, 10:50
- Re: Transversality, Embedded Submanifolds question, James, 10:49
- Re: Transversality, Embedded Submanifolds question, Lee Rudolph, 10:38
- Monadic-Mathematics, DoronShadmi, 10:37
- Klein Bottle question, Tony, 10:26
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 10:23
- Re: cosh, (-Peter-), 10:18
- Re: Cantor's paradise of fools, Randy Poe, 10:14
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 10:06
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, David Hartley, 10:05
- Re: Banach space whose dual is c_0, Valeriu Anisiu, 09:48
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Keith Williams, 09:46
- Re: bessel functions of complex order and complex argument, SOme, 09:46
- Re: cosh, Philippe 92, 09:34
- Transversality, Embedded Submanifolds question, Laura Rossi, 09:24
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 09:11
- Re: Banach space whose dual is c_0, David C . Ullrich, 08:55
- Re: Banach space whose dual is c_0, David C . Ullrich, 08:54
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, David C . Ullrich, 08:31
- Re: Quantum Pi, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:18
- Re: Banach space whose dual is c_0, David C . Ullrich, 08:18
- Re: about Rudin, Robert Low, 08:16
- Re: cosh, Robert Low, 08:14
- Re: Descending Chain Condition, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 08:02
- Re: about Rudin, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:59
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:57
- Re: Banach space whose dual is c_0, Valeriu Anisiu, 07:56
- Re: Arzela Ascoli, David C . Ullrich, 07:56
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, G. A. Edgar, 07:50
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, David C . Ullrich, 07:50
- Re: Banach space whose dual is c_0, G. A. Edgar, 07:45
- Re: x^(2/4) = x^(1/2) ... don't think so!, David C . Ullrich, 07:31
- Re: about Rudin, David C . Ullrich, 07:23
- Re: Complex measures and variation, David C . Ullrich, 07:16
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, David C . Ullrich, 07:14
- Re: cosh, (-Peter-), 07:02
- Re: Quantum Pi, Philippe 92, 06:48
- Re: Radical Expression For cos(2*pi/23), M.A.Fajjal, 06:40
- Re: cosh, gerben47, 06:30
- bessel functions of complex order and complex argument, Jon Allin, 06:28
- Re: cosh, William Elliot, 06:23
- Re: Cantor's paradise of fools, Larry Lard, 06:00
- Re: Proper classes, Aatu Koskensilta, 05:29
- Re: cosh, (-Peter-), 05:28
- Re: Proper classes, Aatu Koskensilta, 05:25
- Re: cosh, alainverghote, 05:21
- Re: solve differential eqution in mathcad, (-Peter-), 05:15
- Re: Intro to Analysis by William Wade - opinions?, David Ames, 05:13
- cosh, (-Peter-), 05:12
- Re: a simpler, easier kalman filter, donstockbauer, 04:55
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 04:55
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 04:33
- PC exicutable of Ocatve?, Scott Kelley, 04:33
- Re: Descending Chain Condition, William Elliot, 04:27
- Banach space whose dual is c_0, Tommi Höynälänmaa, 03:55
- Golay Codig, DerrickLohWC, 03:10
- Re: Free abelian groups, simplicial homology, W. Dale Hall, 02:12
- Re: are differential geometry and topology useful?, Dr Tim, 02:12
- Re: Cantor's paradise of fools, Gottfried Helms, 02:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 01:23
- Re: Complex measures and variation, Ahpla, 01:10
- Re: a simpler, easier kalman filter, magic math tricks, 00:51
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:45
- Re: are differential geometry and topology useful?, smn, 00:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 00:17
- Re: Arzela Ascoli, smn, 00:17
December 15, 2005
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 23:56
- Re: Poisson process, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 23:55
- Re: NO1 SEXセット!, Proginoskes, 23:48
- Re: about Rudin, abe . buckingham, 23:37
- Re: Locality and non-locality as fundamental properties, DoronShadmi, 23:32
- Re: Hyperboloid model of hyerbolic plane, TCL, 23:18
- Re: two similar probability questions?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 23:01
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:55
- Re: Paths in two dimensional lattices, Paul Abbott, 22:45
- $B!Z=EMW![7HBSHV9f8r49$7$F2<$5$$(B, info, 22:41
- Re: Intro to Analysis by William Wade - opinions?, quasi, 22:34
- Re: about Rudin, Karl M. Bunday, 22:21
- Re: are differential geometry and topology useful?, quasi, 22:19
- Re: connected sets, closure question, William Elliot, 22:15
- Re: Descending Chain Condition, Arturo Magidin, 22:00
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:53
- Re: Descending Chain Condition, William Elliot, 21:52
- are differential geometry and topology useful?, comtech, 21:38
- Intro to Analysis by William Wade - opinions?, deniz . bahar, 21:17
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 21:16
- Re: Limit points, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 20:59
- Re: The set of All sets, MoeBlee, 20:59
- Re: Poisson process, Herman Rubin, 20:58
- Free abelian groups, simplicial homology, Laura Rossi, 20:41
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, Herman Rubin, 20:41
- Re: maple multiplication problem, Robert Israel, 20:34
- Re: Limit points, lataianu bogdan, 20:23
- Re: Limit points, lataianu bogdan, 20:22
- Re: two similar probability questions?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:14
- Re: maple multiplication problem, quasi, 20:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:02
- Re: Limit points, Albert, 19:55
- Re: Quantum Pi, Robert J. Kolker, 19:38
- Re: I found Pi, Christian Claiborn, 19:20
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, dwwdkddb, 19:17
- Re: connected sets, closure question, lataianu bogdan, 19:15
- Re: Poisson process, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:14
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Nam Nguyen, 19:06
- Re: Strategical approach of a PhD-student in math, Peter Allen, 18:53
- Re: connected sets, closure question, lataianu bogdan, 18:51
- Re: Set of Cauchy sequences (1), Peter Allen, 18:44
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, David Hartley, 18:37
- Re: connected sets, closure question, SusanP, 18:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, James Burns, 18:32
- Re: connected sets, closure question, SusanP, 18:31
- Re: connected sets, closure question, lataianu bogdan, 18:28
- maple multiplication problem, Jonas, 18:27
- Limit points, Albert, 18:24
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, Arturo Magidin, 18:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 18:12
- Re: surface equivalence, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 18:11
- Re: connected sets, closure question, smn, 18:10
- Re: Cantor's paradise of fools, alan, 18:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Nam Nguyen, 18:05
- hint, richard miller, 18:05
- Arzela Ascoli, George Vivaldi, 17:47
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, dwwdkddb, 17:46
- Cantor's paradise of fools, david petry, 17:46
- Re: a simpler, easier kalman filter, Meker John, 17:28
- Poisson process, Wing, 17:26
- connected sets, closure question, SusanP, 17:21
- a simpler, easier kalman filter, magic math tricks, 17:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 17:11
- Re: question about why a proof of compactness is wrong, david petry, 17:11
- Re: Descending Chain Condition, Stan Brown, 17:02
- Re: 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, Dave Rusin, 16:39
- Re: Paths in two dimensional lattices, brogers, 16:36
- Re: two similar probability questions?, Meker John, 16:35
- Re: Paths in two dimensional lattices, brogers, 16:34
- Re: Paths in two dimensional lattices, brogers, 16:33
- Re: x^(2/4) = x^(1/2) ... don't think so!, Kenneth Bull, 16:31
- Re: two similar probability questions?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:19
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, Ingrid, 16:02
- Re: Quantum Pi, Kees, 16:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:56
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:53
- two similar probability questions?, yuanhp_china, 15:49
- Re: The Truth, Kees, 15:45
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:41
- Re: Quantum Pi, Philippe 92, 15:41
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:40
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, Arturo Magidin, 15:36
- Re: Strategical approach of a PhD-student in math, dwwdkddb, 15:24
- NO1$B!!(BSEX$B%;%C%H!*(B, info, 15:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:11
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, dwwdkddb, 15:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:04
- Re: about Rudin, sengal . kiru, 15:03
- Re: Quantum Pi, Martin Wanvik, 15:02
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, G. A. Edgar, 14:53
- Re: Quantum Pi, magicvsmagick, 14:53
- Re: Locality and non-locality as fundamental properties, DoronShadmi, 14:51
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, dwwdkddb, 14:50
- Re: I found Pi, Philippe 92, 14:43
- Re: 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, Thanhhahuy, 14:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:29
- Re: Transversal intersections question., James, 14:25
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, Jules, 14:19
- Re: Well-ordered subsets of Q, Arturo Magidin, 14:18
- Re: Set of Cauchy sequences (2), Dave Seaman, 14:14
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 14:11
- Re: Quantum Pi, Jules, 14:11
- Re: The Truth, Geevarghese Philip, 14:10
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 14:07
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:06
- Well-ordered subsets of Q, dwwdkddb, 14:05
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 14:04
- Re: infinite sum, Robert Israel, 14:03
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 14:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:59
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 13:55
- Re: x^(2/4) = x^(1/2) ... don't think so!, Robert Israel, 13:53
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 13:52
- Re: Strategical approach of a PhD-student in math, Marc Olschok, 13:51
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:47
- Re: The Truth, William Hughes, 13:47
- Quantum Pi, magicvsmagick, 13:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:36
- Set of Cauchy sequences (2), Michael Stemper, 13:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:27
- Re: infinite sum, alan, 13:26
- Re: Set of Cauchy sequences (1), Michael Stemper, 13:26
- Re: Proper classes, Torkel Franzen, 13:25
- Re: x^(2/4) = x^(1/2) ... don't think so!, G. A. Edgar, 13:23
- Re: Proper classes, Herman Rubin, 13:23
- Re: Set of Cauchy sequences (1), Michael Stemper, 13:22
- Re: about Rudin, A N Niel, 13:21
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:21
- Re: Locality and non-locality as fundamental properties, DoronShadmi, 13:21
- Re: The local and the non-local, DoronShadmi, 13:20
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:17
- Re: complete category, Marc Olschok, 13:16
- Re: Fredholm alternative theorem...., Robert Israel, 13:10
- Re: The Truth, Kees, 13:09
- Re: The Truth, Kees, 13:02
- x^(2/4) = x^(1/2) ... don't think so!, Kenneth Bull, 13:00
- Re: about Rudin, Robert J. Kolker, 12:57
- Re: Levy and Goldbach, Robert Israel, 12:54
- Re: Descending Chain Condition, Brian M. Scott, 12:40
- Re: I found Pi, Dement, 12:25
- Re: about Rudin, Bart Goddard, 12:19
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:18
- Re: Curve in plane, interior and tangents question, David C . Ullrich, 12:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:17
- Re: Set of Cauchy sequences (1), David C . Ullrich, 12:16
- Re: about Rudin, David C . Ullrich, 12:13
- Re: Levy and Goldbach, philippe, 12:12
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:11
- Re: The Truth, Geevarghese Philip, 12:05
- Re: Levy and Goldbach, luiroto, 11:57
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 11:56
- Re: f(x)=x, Arturo Magidin, 11:56
- f(x)=x, Earl Purple, 11:55
- Locality and non-locality as fundamental properties, DoronShadmi, 11:55
- Re: I found Pi, Keith A. Lewis, 11:48
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 11:46
- Fredholm alternative theorem...., Harry901.tw, 11:45
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:43
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 11:40
- Re: The Truth, Geevarghese Philip, 11:39
- Re: I found Pi, magicvsmagick, 11:34
- Re: Proper classes, Richard Harter, 11:33
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:29
- Re: Iterative pseudoinverse method, Brian Borchers, 11:28
- Re: about Rudin, Robert J. Kolker, 11:17
- Re: The local and the non-local, DoronShadmi, 11:17
- Re: I found Pi, magicvsmagick, 11:11
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:07
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 11:05
- Re: Curve in plane, interior and tangents question, José Carlos Santos, 11:05
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 11:02
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:52
- Re: Proper classes, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:49
- Re: about Rudin, A N Niel, 10:48
- Re: 10 Dice Experiment is PERFECTLY NORMAL!, Elliott Chapin, 10:44
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, G. A. Edgar, 10:43
- Re: Proper classes, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:39
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Keith Williams, 10:39
- Re: Question about markov chains, contactintermagix, 10:35
- Re: Curve in plane, interior and tangents question, Lee Rudolph, 10:34
- Re: The local and the non-local, DoronShadmi, 10:32
- Re: Associated sheaf puzzle, Jannick Asmus, 10:27
- Re: Descending Chain Condition, Arturo Magidin, 10:20
- Re: Proper classes, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:14
- Re: The Truth, DoronShadmi, 10:14
- Re: The local and the non-local, DoronShadmi, 10:10
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, donaldtweed, 10:07
- Re: Curve in plane, interior and tangents question, José Carlos Santos, 10:05
- Re: Transversal intersections question., Lee Rudolph, 10:05
- Curve in plane, interior and tangents question, Sarah B., 10:02
- Re: Set of Cauchy sequences (1), Dave Seaman, 10:00
- Re: I found Pi, Randy Poe, 10:00
- Re: Proper classes, Han de Bruijn, 09:53
- Transversal intersections question., James, 09:51
- Re: I found Pi, Michael Orion, 09:51
- Re: I found Pi, Michael Orion, 09:46
- Re: Proper classes, zuhair, 09:45
- Re: question about why a proof of compactness is wrong, David C . Ullrich, 09:39
- Re: Hilbert transform, David C . Ullrich, 09:27
- Re: Complex measures and variation, David C . Ullrich, 09:23
- Set of Cauchy sequences (1), Michael Stemper, 09:17
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, David C . Ullrich, 09:14
- Re: Can someone please help me solve this "work" problem?, Bart Goddard, 09:12
- Re: Descending Chain Condition, Robert Low, 08:55
- Descending Chain Condition, William Elliot, 08:50
- Re: solved exercises, Robert Low, 08:36
- Re: solved exercises, claudia . giardi, 08:33
- Re: solved exercises, Robert J. Kolker, 08:28
- Re: Proper classes, Jesse F. Hughes, 08:24
- Re: I found Pi, Alex Hunsley, 08:22
- solved exercises, claudia . giardi, 08:21
- Re: I found Pi, Alex Hunsley, 08:18
- Re: Proper classes, Jesse F. Hughes, 08:17
- Re: Isometric deformations of the two sphere? Seems nonintuitive to me, Lee Rudolph, 08:13
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, G. A. Edgar, 07:38
- Re: Proper classes and the distiction between the local and the non-local, DoronShadmi, 07:20
- Re: Proper classes, DoronShadmi, 06:54
- Re: The Truth, Han de Bruijn, 06:47
- Re: Coefficient in Laurent series, Han de Bruijn, 06:43
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 06:42
- Re: sum inverse prime, jj, 06:40
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 06:38
- Re: Associated sheaf puzzle, Jose Capco, 06:35
- Re: The Truth, Han de Bruijn, 06:34
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 06:18
- Re: Least primes in arithmetic progressions, Jens Kruse Andersen, 06:18
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 06:15
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 05:46
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Robert Low, 05:33
- Re: I found Pi, Robert Low, 05:32
- Re: Paths in two dimensional lattices, Larry Lard, 05:20
- Re: The Truth, Han de Bruijn, 05:11
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han de Bruijn, 05:05
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han de Bruijn, 05:03
- Re: clifford / geometric algebra from 4D vector-, mjb, 04:40
- Re: infinite sum, Gottfried Helms, 04:36
- Re: I found Pi, Philippe 92, 04:33
- Re: Proper classes, Han de Bruijn, 04:31
- Levy and Goldbach, conradeaton, 04:31
- Re: Proper classes and the non-finite, DoronShadmi, 04:26
- Re: I found Pi, Gib Bogle, 04:26
- infinite sum, alan, 04:20
- Re: The set of All sets, zuhair, 04:13
- Re: Proper classes, Han de Bruijn, 04:10
- Re: Proper classes, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:56
- Re: Least primes in arithmetic progressions, Risto Kauppila, 03:35
- Re: 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, Virgil, 03:19
- Re: Proper classes, zuhair, 02:27
- Re: Proper classes, zuhair, 02:20
- Re: Proper classes, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:19
- Re: Proper classes, zuhair, 02:16
- Re: identification topology. homeomorphism?, William Elliot, 02:07
- Re: Proper classes and the non-finite, zuhair, 02:06
- Re: ? similar but more than linear programming, Erwin Kalvelagen, 01:07
- Re: solve this problem, Narasimham, 01:07
- Re: Iterative pseudoinverse method, Robert Israel, 01:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 01:01
- Re: Proper classes, Jonathan Hoyle, 01:00
- Re: Proper classes, Jonathan Hoyle, 00:41
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 00:26
- ? similar but more than linear programming, Cheng Cosine, 00:25
- Re: 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, Meker John, 00:17
- Re: 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, Meker John, 00:16
- Re: sum inverse prime, Gerry Myerson, 00:15
- Re: Paths in two dimensional lattices, Gerry Myerson, 00:14
- Re: Isometric deformations of the two sphere? Seems nonintuitive to me, Narasimham, 00:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 00:08
December 14, 2005
- Re: Isometric deformations of the two sphere? Seems nonintuitive to me, Narasimham, 23:56
- Re: 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, Thanhhahuy, 23:55
- Re: Strategical approach of a PhD-student in math, Dave, 23:44
- Re: 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 23:44
- Re: 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, Meker John, 23:42
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 23:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 23:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 23:20
- Re: Paths in two dimensional lattices, Jules, 23:20
- Re: solve differential eqution in mathcad, howardrh, 23:17
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 23:16
- 3 equations and 3 unknown, how to solve it?, Thanhhahuy, 23:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 22:55
- Re: I found Pi, alan, 22:55
- Re: complete category, No One, 22:49
- Re: Isometric deformations of the two sphere? Seems nonintuitive to me, Jules, 22:48
- Re: HELP WITH CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY, Robert Israel, 22:44
- Re: solve differential eqution in mathcad, Dave, 22:24
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Darko Aleksic, 22:16
- Re: Question about exponent type things, alan, 22:15
- Re: I found Pi, alan, 22:12
- Re: I found Pi, Randy Poe, 22:04
- Re: I found Pi, Randy Poe, 22:02
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: Question about exponent type things, Randy Poe, 21:55
- Re: I found Pi, magicvsmagick, 21:52
- Question about exponent type things, potnisanish, 21:50
- Paths in two dimensional lattices, brogers, 21:39
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, George Ellison, 21:34
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Dave L. Renfro, 21:31
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, donaldtweed, 21:29
- A disposable identity is very powerful... hence urban crime., Jeff_Relf, 21:25
- Iterative pseudoinverse method, Ken Honda, 21:22
- Re: differentiability on closed interval [a,b], Dave L. Renfro, 21:21
- Re: limit of a limit, Rob Johnson, 21:18
- Re: limit of a limit, gaya . patel, 21:01
- differentiability on closed interval [a,b], gaya . patel, 20:55
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, George Ellison, 20:38
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Rich Grise, 20:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 20:20
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Mike Young, 20:14
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 20:02
- Re: limit of a limit, Rob Johnson, 19:40
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 19:38
- Re: Strategical approach of a PhD-student in math, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:15
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 19:05
- Oficina Internet de Hispano Central Santandero, Grupo Santander Central Hispano, 18:32
- Re: Proper classes, Jesse F. Hughes, 18:22
- Re: Proper classes, Jesse F. Hughes, 18:16
- Euler numbers again:, Roman B. Binder, 18:14
- HELP WITH CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY, contactintermagix, 18:13
- Re: Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad, 17:57
- Re: I found Pi, Randy Poe, 17:53
- Re: Can someone please help me solve this "work" problem?, alan, 17:45
- Re: The Truth, Kees, 17:37
- Re: Can someone please help me solve this "work" problem?, lee, 17:35
- Re: I found Pi, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 17:26
- Re: I found Pi, Ken Pledger, 17:26
- Re: Can someone please help me solve this "work" problem?, Bart Goddard, 17:00
- Re: I found Pi, alan, 16:51
- Re: Strategical approach of a PhD-student in math, Jose Capco, 16:47
- Re: Can someone please help me solve this "work" problem?, Jerry, 16:31
- Re: Can someone please help me solve this "work" problem?, alan, 16:24
- Re: I found Pi, Randy Poe, 16:24
- Re: Proper classes, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:22
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:17
- Re: I found Pi, magicvsmagick, 16:16
- Can someone please help me solve this "work" problem?, Jerry, 16:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 16:11
- Re: The Truth, zuhair, 16:09
- Re: question about why a proof of compactness is wrong, Rob Johnson, 16:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, MoeBlee, 16:07
- Re: complete category, Marc Olschok, 16:04
- Re: Question about markov chains, Robert Israel, 16:03
- Re: Proper classes, Aatu Koskensilta, 15:57
- Re: Proper classes and the non-finite, DoronShadmi, 15:55
- Re: 10 Dice Experiment is PERFECTLY NORMAL!, alan, 15:53
- Re: I found Pi, Randy Poe, 15:44
- Re: Question about markov chains, contactintermagix, 15:41
- Re: I found Pi, magicvsmagick, 15:33
- Re: limit of a limit, G.E. Ivey, 15:33
- Re: Proper classes, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:12
- Re: Least primes in arithmetic progressions, Risto Kauppila, 15:08
- Re: I found Pi, Keith A. Lewis, 15:07
- Re: I found Pi, Randy Poe, 15:06
- re:Proof for reals requires proof for integers first?, William McWorter, 15:02
- Re: I found Pi, alan, 14:56
- Re: Least primes in arithmetic progressions, Risto Kauppila, 14:47
- Re: Proper classes, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:17
- Re: diagonal argument, Dave L. Renfro, 14:13
- Re: question about why a proof of compactness is wrong, Arturo Magidin, 14:10
- Discrete event simulation & AVL Tree, Ghislain, 14:01
- Re: Can anyone solve this?, Randy Poe, 14:01
- The Truth, zuhair, 14:00
- question about why a proof of compactness is wrong, SusanP, 13:52
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:30
- Re: Group Homomorphism, José Carlos Santos, 13:15
- Re: 10 Dice Experiment is PERFECTLY NORMAL!, Brablo, 13:03
- Re: diagonal argument, Geevarghese Philip, 12:48
- Re: Proper classes, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:40
- Re: Can anyone solve this?, Randy Poe, 12:29
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:25
- Re: Group Homomorphism, , 12:23
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, David R Tribble, 11:17
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, luiroto, 10:17
- Re: identification topology. homeomorphism?, Martin Wanvik, 10:01
- Re: Hilbert transform, David C . Ullrich, 10:00
- Strategical approach of a PhD-student in math, Jose Capco, 09:59
- Re: Proper classes and the non-finite, DoronShadmi, 09:58
- Re: question about weighted vertex cover algorithm, Gotch, 09:58
- Re: Complex measures and variation, David C . Ullrich, 09:57
- Re: limit of a limit, David C . Ullrich, 09:50
- Re: Question about markov chains, contactintermagix, 09:50
- Re: Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad, 09:48
- Coefficient in Laurent series, Han de Bruijn, 09:48
- Re: identification topology. homeomorphism?, Jannick Asmus, 09:44
- Re: FOURIER TRANSFORM QUESTION - please help, David C . Ullrich, 09:42
- Re: Associated sheaf puzzle, Jannick Asmus, 09:39
- Re: riemann, luiroto, 09:23
- Re: Number of trees, Graphs theory, Anon, 08:43
- Number of trees, Graphs theory, Asikhit Pshenavan, 08:07
- Strongly connected components of hypergraph, Standa K., 08:04
- Re: diagonal argument, Dave Seaman, 07:56
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:46
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:45
- Re: riemann, Lee Rudolph, 07:42
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:35
- Re: riemann, luiroto, 07:32
- Re: need some career advice, John Coleman, 07:30
- Re: solve this problem, Me, 07:14
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Han de Bruijn, 07:10
- Re: Group Homomorphism, Tanja, 07:06
- Re: Proper classes, Aatu Koskensilta, 06:59
- Re: Group Homomorphism, José Carlos Santos, 06:52
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Robert Low, 06:46
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Han de Bruijn, 06:42
- Re: Associated sheaf puzzle, Lukas Horosiewicz, 06:36
- Re: Group Homomorphism, Tanja, 06:18
- Re: Motivation between sheafs and category theory, Lukas Horosiewicz, 06:14
- Re: solve this problem, Robert Low, 06:06
- solve this problem, narasimha_murthy_h, 06:01
- Re: complete category, Lukas Horosiewicz, 05:44
- Group Homomorphism, Tanja, 05:31
- Associated sheaf puzzle, Jose Capco, 05:19
- Hilbert transform, N. Karjanto, 05:11
- Re: Steiner Systems, , 04:55
- Re: result from set theory (i think), Valeriu Anisiu, 04:00
- Re: diagonal argument, K. P. Hart, 03:34
- Re: diagonal argument, K. P. Hart, 03:28
- Re: need some career advice, woodland, 03:21
- Re: Proper classes, Robert Low, 02:57
- Re: limit of an equation, Bill Dubuque, 02:44
- Re: Proper classes, zuhair, 02:31
- Re: question about weighted vertex cover algorithm, Dr Tim, 02:29
- Re: Proper classes, zuhair, 02:29
- Re: Proper classes, Aatu Koskensilta, 02:18
- Re: proof that our physical space is Riemannian geometry Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 02:12
- Re: Proper classes, Aatu Koskensilta, 02:07
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, Proginoskes, 02:03
- Re: what "REALLY" is derivative?, Bill Dubuque, 01:42
- Re: Cashbox withdrawal, Robert Israel, 01:26
- Complex measures and variation, Ahpla, 01:20
- Re: limit of a limit, The World Wide Wade, 01:15
- complete category, No One, 01:14
- Re: determination of amplifier gain function, Scott Kelley, 01:13
- nonlinear coupled PDE's, rancid moth, 01:11
- Re: determination of amplifier gain function, Scott Kelley, 01:02
- Re: limit of a limit, William Elliot, 00:45
December 13, 2005
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 21:31
- Re: Is Time a Vector?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:24
- Re: what "REALLY" is derivative?, Gib Bogle, 21:20
- Re: To determine the convergence and divergence, Someonekicked, 20:37
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 20:14
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, david petry, 19:41
- Re: limit of an equation, LC Killingbeck, 19:32
- limit of an equation, Mike, 18:47
- identification topology. homeomorphism?, Bob, 18:45
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 18:43
- result from set theory (i think), alan, 18:41
- Re: high school inequality, Martin Wanvik, 18:21
- Re: analytic prolongation, martin cohen, 18:04
- Re: analytic prolongation, david petry, 18:04
- Re: what "REALLY" is derivative?, Robert Low, 18:03
- Re: what "REALLY" is derivative?, Mike Terry, 18:02
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, ArtflDodgr, 18:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:49
- Re: what "REALLY" is derivative?, bobovski, 17:48
- Re: Least primes in arithmetic progressions, Gerry Myerson, 17:45
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, david petry, 17:32
- Re: Proper classes, MoeBlee, 17:22
- Re: calculus, Robert Low, 17:21
- Re: high school inequality, Robert Israel, 17:18
- Re: Question about domain "stretching", agapito6314, 17:11
- Re: what "REALLY" is derivative?, Dave L. Renfro, 17:07
- Re: Proper classes, Robert Low, 17:07
- Re: what "REALLY" is derivative?, Narasimham, 17:06
- Re: Help: a interesting probability question, Robert Israel, 17:02
- Re: analytic prolongation, Robert Israel, 16:54
- Re: lcm (p-1,p^n-1), Dave Rusin, 16:53
- Re: what "REALLY" is derivative?, mskirvin, 16:47
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 16:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 16:34
- Re: calculus, erehwon, 16:33
- Re: Proper classes, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:30
- Re: what "REALLY" is derivative?, Randy Poe, 16:27
- Re: what "REALLY" is derivative?, Watson Ladd, 16:22
- Re: what "REALLY" is derivative?, Arturo Magidin, 16:22
- Re: lcm (p-1,p^n-1), Phil Carmody, 16:21
- what "REALLY" is derivative?, Luke Wu, 16:05
- high school inequality, lataianu bogdan, 15:51
- Re: clifford / geometric algebra from 4D vector-, JEMebius, 15:23
- Help: a interesting probability question, yuanhp_china, 15:21
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 15:06
- Re: Proper classes, Herman Rubin, 14:55
- Re: FOURIER TRANSFORM QUESTION - please help, Robert Israel, 14:53
- Re: Question about markov chains, contactintermagix, 14:52
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:49
- Re: FOURIER TRANSFORM QUESTION - please help, contactintermagix, 14:47
- Re: analytic prolongation, Tamara Diaz, 14:43
- question about weighted vertex cover algorithm, Gotch, 14:38
- Re: Proper classes, Herman Rubin, 14:33
- Re: Proper classes, Dave Seaman, 14:29
- Re: Proper classes, zuhair, 14:19
- Re: diagonal argument, Dave L. Renfro, 14:16
- Re: Proper classes, zuhair, 14:16
- Re: FOURIER TRANSFORM QUESTION - please help, Herman Rubin, 14:08
- Re: FOURIER TRANSFORM QUESTION - please help, David C. Ullrich, 14:06
- Re: complex equation, abe . buckingham, 14:03
- Re: Proper classes, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:03
- Re: Least primes in arithmetic progressions, Risto Kauppila, 14:02
- Re: Question about markov chains, Herman Rubin, 13:56
- Re: Question about markov chains, Robert Israel, 13:53
- Re: extensions of Bezout's theorem to non-integer powers?, Dave Rusin, 13:46
- Re: Proper classes, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:45
- Re: lcm (p-1,p^n-1), Keith A. Lewis, 13:33
- proof that our physical space is Riemannian geometry Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 13:32
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, ArtflDodgr, 13:29
- Re: Proper classes, zuhair, 13:27
- Re: What is the range of this function?, Robert Israel, 13:21
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 13:17
- Re: Least primes in arithmetic progressions, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 13:15
- Re: diagonal argument, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 12:50
- Re: diagonal argument, Dave Seaman, 12:49
- Re: Using chain rule for D(y^2) w.r.t. x, Keith A. Lewis, 12:41
- Graduate Level Math Books For Sale, dgiaimo, 12:31
- Re: Least primes in arithmetic progressions, Robert Israel, 12:24
- Re: diagonal argument, abe . buckingham, 12:15
- Re: extensions of Bezout's theorem to non-integer powers?, c.rowat@xxxxxxxxxx, 12:14
- Re: locally bdd function, additive, Robert Israel, 12:02
- Re: The set of All sets, MoeBlee, 11:42
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:19
- Re: complex equation, (-Peter-), 11:17
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 11:13
- FOURIER TRANSFORM QUESTION - please help, contactintermagix, 11:12
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, John Larkin, 11:11
- Re: diagonal argument, K. P. Hart, 11:10
- Re: Proper classes, Robert Low, 11:09
- Re: complex equation, Robert Low, 11:07
- Re: Proper classes, zuhair, 11:05
- complex equation, (-Peter-), 11:04
- Re: lcm (p-1,p^n-1), Dave Rusin, 10:55
- Re: Courses to take to prepare for graduate school in mathematics? And other advise?, solarmist, 10:53
- Re: diagonal argument, Dave Seaman, 10:41
- Re: concerning the gateaux derivative, Jiri Lebl, 10:36
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 10:30
- Re: What is the range of this function?, Lee Rudolph, 10:29
- Re: What is the range of this function?, José Carlos Santos, 10:27
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Richard Henry, 10:25
- Re: What is the range of this function?, TCL, 10:13
- Re: Is this function on [0, 1] Riemann integrable?, Rob Johnson, 10:07
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Keith Williams, 10:06
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:00
- diagonal argument, K. P. Hart, 10:00
- Re: Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad, 09:55
- Question about markov chains, contactintermagix, 09:41
- What is the range of this function?, TCL, 09:33
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, David C . Ullrich, 09:25
- Re: Is this function on [0, 1] Riemann integrable?, David C . Ullrich, 08:36
- Re: Is this function on [0, 1] Riemann integrable?, David C . Ullrich, 08:34
- Re: 10 Dice Experiment is PERFECTLY NORMAL!, luiroto, 08:34
- Re: Is this function on [0, 1] Riemann integrable?, David C . Ullrich, 08:32
- Re: The set of All sets, Dave Seaman, 08:16
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:08
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:05
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, G. A. Edgar, 07:58
- Re: problem with a definition, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:49
- Re: twonnyshiksh pagesh, Torkel Franzen, 07:41
- Re: twonnyshiksh pagesh, g . baiszar, 07:37
- Re: Courses to take to prepare for graduate school in mathematics? And other advise?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:22
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 07:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 07:13
- Re: clifford / geometric algebra from 4D vector, Ross A. Finlayson, 06:59
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 06:43
- Re: The set of All sets, Ross A. Finlayson, 06:16
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 06:15
- clifford / geometric algebra from 4D vector, mjb, 05:45
- Re: Proper classes, Robert Low, 05:28
- Re: Proper classes, Toni Lassila, 05:24
- Proper classes, zuhair, 05:14
- Re: The set of All sets, zuhair, 05:02
- Full of health? Then don't click!, "Gelbman", 04:57
- Re: lcm (p-1,p^n-1), José Carlos Santos, 04:43
- Re: lcm (p-1,p^n-1), José Carlos Santos, 04:43
- Re: Simplifying a step-function, almurph, 04:42
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, Chan-Ho Suh, 04:41
- Re: Least primes in arithmetic progressions, Risto Kauppila, 04:38
- Re: Least primes in arithmetic progressions, Phil Carmody, 03:58
- Oblique cone enclosing a pyramid, Narasimham, 03:32
- Re: Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 03:12
- Re: Wait a minute, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:56
- Least primes in arithmetic progressions, Risto Kauppila, 02:55
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Tom Hardy, 02:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 01:58
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 01:48
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, Proginoskes, 01:41
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 01:35
- Does this have a name [matrix mappings]?, Adam, 01:27
- Lebesgue Stiltjes Integral, Ingrid, 01:27
- Re: need some career advice, magic math tricks, 01:24
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 01:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 01:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:58
- Re: need some career advice, Klueless, 00:28
- Re: locally bdd function, additive, JimLong, 00:02
December 12, 2005
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 23:47
- Re: locally bdd function, additive, Robert Israel, 23:44
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Russell Wallace, 23:07
- Re: The set of All sets, MoeBlee, 23:05
- Re: Using chain rule for D(y^2) w.r.t. x, Virgil, 23:05
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Guess who, 23:03
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 22:53
- Re: Dedekind Domain, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:57
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:53
- charges (generalization of measures), donaldtweed, 21:35
- Re: 10 Dice Experiment is PERFECTLY NORMAL!, Colleyville Alan, 21:29
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Arturo Magidin, 21:28
- Re: Topology Questions, Lee Rudolph, 20:36
- Re: 10 Dice Experiment is PERFECTLY NORMAL!, Herman Rubin, 20:35
- Re: Is this function on [0, 1] Riemann integrable?, Herman Rubin, 20:31
- Re: Jacobian problem in dimension 2 solved, Lee Rudolph, 20:27
- Award: We are waiting for your nomination, "Giovanni Neely", 20:27
- Re: How would you share the cost?, Steve, 20:20
- Re: The set of All sets, Herman Rubin, 20:20
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Herman Rubin, 20:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:12
- Wait a minute, Fola, 19:48
- Re: lcm (p-1,p^n-1), Phil Carmody, 19:35
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Justin, 19:07
- Re: Using chain rule for D(y^2) w.r.t. x, Keith A. Lewis, 18:57
- Re: locally bdd function, additive, JimLong, 18:54
- Re: Using chain rule for D(y^2) w.r.t. x, Robert Low, 18:28
- Re: Using chain rule for D(y^2) w.r.t. x, Robert Low, 18:25
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Daryl McCullough, 18:12
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, luiroto, 18:09
- Re: A Dirichlet function and Darboux sums..., joshuaxls, 18:08
- A Dirichlet function and Darboux sums..., joshuaxls, 18:02
- Re: Jacobian problem in dimension 2 solved, Gerry Myerson, 18:01
- Re: [Question] Dedekind Domain, Bill Dubuque, 17:51
- Re: Is Time a Vector?, David Park, 17:38
- 10 Dice Experiment is PERFECTLY NORMAL!, Brablo, 17:38
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Rich Grise, but drunk, 17:35
- Re: Is Time a Vector?, David Park, 17:33
- Re: Using chain rule for D(y^2) w.r.t. x, Virgil, 17:32
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, but drunk, 17:32
- Re: Is this function on [0, 1] Riemann integrable?, Peter Allen, 17:31
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, but drunk, 17:23
- Re: Is this function on [0, 1] Riemann integrable?, mathman, 17:23
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, but drunk, 17:20
- Re: Using chain rule for D(y^2) w.r.t. x, mathman, 17:19
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, but drunk, 17:18
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Robert Israel, 17:11
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, but drunk, 17:08
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, John Fields, 17:05
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, but drunk, 17:02
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Ronald Bruck, 17:01
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, but drunk, 17:00
- Using chain rule for D(y^2) w.r.t. x, boanerges35, 16:58
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 16:58
- Re: Is Time a Vector?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 16:55
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, 16:54
- Re: Question about domain "stretching", Robert Israel, 16:47
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 16:43
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, 16:38
- Re: Poisson distribution, Robert Israel, 16:36
- Re: Topology Questions, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:26
- Is this function on [0, 1] Riemann integrable?, comtech, 16:23
- Re: Topology Questions, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:06
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Randy Poe, 16:00
- Re: Chasles theorem, Ken Pledger, 15:53
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:51
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Robert Low, 15:48
- Re: Topology Questions, Robert Low, 15:46
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:45
- Re: analytic prolongation, Peter L. Montgomery, 15:44
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Randy Poe, 15:41
- Re: analytic prolongation, david petry, 15:40
- Re: The set of All sets, MoeBlee, 15:36
- Re: Poisson distribution, Herman Rubin, 15:30
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Jake Wildstrom, 15:30
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, david petry, 15:27
- C's char vs Unicode characters vs addressable_bytes vs fetchable words., Jeff_Relf, 15:27
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:25
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, luiroto, 15:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:20
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Herman Rubin, 15:19
- analytic prolongation, Tamara Diaz, 15:14
- Re: Topology Questions, Lee Rudolph, 15:10
- Re: Question about domain "stretching", G. A. Edgar, 15:09
- Question about domain "stretching", agapito6314, 15:02
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:01
- Re: Epsilon Nets, David C. Ullrich, 14:58
- Re: concerning the gateaux derivative, Robert Low, 14:57
- Re: infinitely often, David C. Ullrich, 14:56
- Re: concerning the gateaux derivative, Jiri Lebl, 14:53
- Re: Complex analysis question, Uniform convergence, David C. Ullrich, 14:51
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Aatu Koskensilta, 14:51
- properly discontinuous action, Bobbine, 14:50
- Re: how many properties do closure and the set itself hold in common?, David C. Ullrich, 14:46
- Re: algebra help - test prep, Arturo Magidin, 14:46
- Re: Topology Questions, Robert Low, 14:25
- Re: Poisson distribution, mkazmierski, 14:25
- Re: simple calculation that is tripping me up :(, Paul Sperry, 14:21
- algebra help - test prep, rookie217, 14:13
- Re: Topology Questions, Xevious, 14:05
- Re: Topology Questions, Dave L. Renfro, 13:56
- Re: Topology Questions, Robert Low, 13:56
- Re: square of sums, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 13:52
- Re: Chasles theorem, Christopher J. Henrich, 13:46
- Re: Complex analysis question, Uniform convergence, José Carlos Santos, 13:46
- Re: Topology Questions, Dave Rusin, 13:44
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:44
- Re: How would you share the cost?, Bart Goddard, 13:40
- Re: how many properties do closure and the set itself hold in common?, The World Wide Wade, 13:38
- Re: Topology Questions, Xevious, 13:36
- Re: Topology Questions, Xevious, 13:34
- Re: Topology Questions, Robert Low, 13:31
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Ronald Bruck, 13:25
- Re: Topology Questions, Xevious, 13:16
- Re: How would you share the cost?, Pubkeybreaker, 13:16
- Re: square of sums, oercim, 13:12
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Arturo Magidin, 13:12
- Re: twonnyshiksh pagesh, 19th century nuthouses, 13:10
- Re: How would you share the cost?, Steve, 13:09
- Re: Topology Questions, matthias, 13:09
- Re: How would you share the cost?, hobart Zklfed, 13:08
- Re: Topology Questions, matthias, 13:08
- Re: How would you share the cost?, Randy Poe, 13:08
- Re: How would you share the cost?, Steve, 13:07
- Polynomial Regression Problem, junoexpress, 13:03
- Re: Simplifying a step-function, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:02
- Re: How would you share the cost?, Pubkeybreaker, 13:01
- Re: lcm (p-1,p^n-1), Dave Rusin, 13:01
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Aatu Koskensilta, 13:00
- Right_Click --> Propeties shows things like: 32.0 KB ( 32,768 bytes ), Jeff_Relf, 13:00
- Re: How would you share the cost?, Robert Israel, 12:53
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Robert Israel, 12:50
- How would you share the cost?, Steve, 12:48
- Re: Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad, 12:47
- Re: square of sums, Robert Israel, 12:45
- Re: Courses to take to prepare for graduate school in mathematics? And other advise?, Xevious, 12:45
- Re: determination of amplifier gain function, Keith A. Lewis, 12:38
- how many properties do closure and the set itself hold in common?, comtech, 12:38
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Ronald Bruck, 12:37
- Re: Help with auto-correlation integral, Robert Israel, 12:37
- square of sums, oercim, 12:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 12:34
- Re: Simplifying a step-function, abhiramrd, 12:31
- Re: Lebesgue Integral, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 12:31
- Re: Epsilon Nets, Xevious, 12:31
- Re: Limit Proofs, Ronald Bruck, 12:31
- Re: What is the name for equations of this type?, Robert Israel, 12:30
- Topology Questions, Xevious, 12:23
- Re: Is Time a Vector?, William Elliot, 12:13
- twonnyshiksh pagesh, 19th century nuthouses, 12:12
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Russell Wallace, 12:09
- Simplifying a step-function, almurph, 12:08
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, onehappymadman, 12:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 11:59
- Re: infinitely often, Wing, 11:58
- Re: Complex analysis question, Uniform convergence, mr0x, 11:55
- Re: Courses to take to prepare for graduate school in mathematics? And other advise?, solarmist, 11:55
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 11:42
- Re: Courses to take to prepare for graduate school in mathematics? And other advise?, mr0x, 11:38
- Re: Complex analysis question, Uniform convergence, A N Niel, 11:06
- Re: Courses to take to prepare for graduate school in mathematics? And other advise?, John Coleman, 11:04
- Re: Complex analysis question, Uniform convergence, José Carlos Santos, 11:03
- Re: Courses to take to prepare for graduate school in mathematics? And other advise?, solarmist, 10:58
- Re: Courses to take to prepare for graduate school in mathematics? And other advise?, solarmist, 10:46
- Complex analysis question, Uniform convergence, James, 10:42
- Re: [Question] Dedekind Domain, Arturo Magidin, 10:32
- Re: problem with a definition, Nathan, 10:28
- Re: problem with a definition, José Carlos Santos, 10:27
- problem with a definition, g_casini, 10:21
- Re: Courses to take to prepare for graduate school in mathematics? And other advise?, solarmist, 10:20
- need some career advice, woodland, 10:08
- Re: Courses to take to prepare for graduate school in mathematics? And other advise?, mr0x, 10:05
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Keith Williams, 09:59
- Re: calculus, Robert Low, 09:17
- Re: Courses to take to prepare for graduate school in mathematics? And other advise?, John Coleman, 09:09
- Re: Alternating group A_6: Does it have an order 72 subgroup?-, JEMebius, 08:55
- Chasles theorem, PaoloB, 08:48
- Re: Completeness, José Carlos Santos, 08:44
- Courses to take to prepare for graduate school in mathematics? And other advise?, joshua . olson, 08:29
- Completeness, anarm3, 08:17
- calculus, erehwon, 08:14
- Re: Jacobian problem in dimension 2 solved, marcfrisch, 08:07
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:00
- Re: Jacobian problem in dimension 2 solved, Lee Rudolph, 07:49
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 07:40
- Help with auto-correlation integral, robert.w.adams@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:14
- simple calculation that is tripping me up :(, SusanP, 07:12
- Re: lcm (p-1,p^n-1), Pubkeybreaker, 07:02
- Is Time a Vector?, venuprasanna, 07:01
- What is the name for equations of this type?, Stephen O'Sullivan, 06:56
- Re: lcm (p-1,p^n-1), José Carlos Santos, 06:51
- Re: Jacobian problem in dimension 2 solved, David C . Ullrich, 06:49
- Re: infinitely often, David C . Ullrich, 06:45
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 06:44
- riemann, Alicia Soriano Bernabé, 06:43
- Re: Epsilon Nets, David C . Ullrich, 06:43
- Re: Jacobian problem in dimension 2 solved, quasi, 06:42
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 06:40
- Re: How to prove that polynomials uniformly converge to polynomial functions?, David C . Ullrich, 06:34
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 06:24
- lcm (p-1,p^n-1), maarte, 06:19
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 06:19
- Re: Jacobian problem in dimension 2 solved, Lee Rudolph, 06:19
- [Question] Dedekind Domain, Taedong Yun, 06:10
- Jacobian problem in dimension 2 solved, marcfrisch, 06:08
- Re: canonical texts in math, Niku, 06:01
- Re: The set of All sets, zuhair, 05:52
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 12, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:44
- Funds for Investments in China, "adams", 04:35
- Re: Dedekind domain + UFD -> PID, Taedong Yun, 03:41
- infinitely often, Wing, 03:24
- Re: Dedekind domain + UFD -> PID, Lukas Horosiewicz, 02:22
- Re: "preserved measure", Robert Israel, 02:15
- Re: Constructive proofs, Keith Ramsay, 01:48
- Re: determination of amplifier gain function, Steve Schwartz, 01:40
- Re: How to prove that polynomials uniformly converge to polynomial functions?, The World Wide Wade, 01:34
- [Question] Dedekind domain + UFD -> PID, Taedong Yun, 01:33
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Robert Israel, 01:26
- Re: How to prove that polynomials uniformly converge to polynomial functions?, Ronald Bruck, 01:18
- Re: PGL(2,p), Keith Ramsay, 00:32
- Re: The set of All sets, Jonathan Hoyle, 00:31
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 00:19
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 00:05
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Keith Ramsay, 00:03
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 00:01
December 11, 2005
- Re: Mathematical property vs. law vs. theorem, MoeBlee, 23:58
- PGL(2,p), DaTa66, 23:44
- Re: Epsilon Nets, Xevious, 23:34
- Re: Gramian matrix, Robert Israel, 23:31
- Re: Epsilon Nets, Xevious, 23:20
- Re: Integral Question, Someonekicked, 23:15
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Keith, 22:53
- Re: Alternating group A_6: Does it have an order 72 subgroup?, Snis Pilbor, 22:51
- Re: Alternating group A_6: Does it have an order 72 subgroup?, Snis Pilbor, 22:37
- Re: Epsilon Nets, Jules, 21:52
- Epsilon Nets, Xevious, 21:12
- Re: canonical texts in math, Gerry Myerson, 21:03
- Re: Gramian matrix, Gerry Myerson, 21:00
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Herman Rubin, 20:53
- Re: Integral Question, Brian VanPelt, 20:43
- Re: Gramian matrix, SusanP, 20:28
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 20:26
- Integral Question, EnterTheUnknown, 20:13
- Re: Average chord, ax@xxxxxxxxx, 20:02
- Re: Gramian matrix, Karl, 19:55
- Re: How to prove that polynomials uniformly converge to polynomial functions?, The World Wide Wade, 19:45
- Re: Poisson distribution, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:28
- Re: Hyperboloid model of hyerbolic plane, TCL, 19:16
- Re: Optimization problem- Please help!! It's worth 3 extra points on my averag, Joseph Fagan, 19:14
- Re: recurrent sequence (corrected version), William Elliot, 19:12
- Re: Average chord, quasi, 19:11
- Re: determination of amplifier gain function, Joseph Fagan, 19:06
- Poisson distribution, mkazmierski, 18:48
- Re: Alternating group A_6: Does it have an order 72 subgroup?, Ted Hwa, 18:46
- recurrent sequence (corrected version), Chris, 18:34
- Re: Fields-finitely generated and finite dimensional, Gerry Myerson, 18:31
- Re: 2 ring theory questions, Peter L. Montgomery, 18:26
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Kleuskes & Moos, 18:13
- Re: Can I have fries and a calculator with that?, Gerry Myerson, 18:07
- Re: Gramian matrix, SusanP, 18:05
- Re: locally bdd function, additive, Robert Israel, 17:59
- Re: Average chord, ax@xxxxxxxxx, 17:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 17:47
- Re: Hyperboloid model of hyerbolic plane, Robert Israel, 17:46
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Peter, 17:44
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:43
- Re: Trumanism and Churchill (not McCarthyism!), David Ames, 17:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Chris Menzel, 17:20
- Re: "preserved measure", mathman, 17:10
- Re: Mathematica question, David Moran, 17:08
- Re: 2 ring theory questions, lataianu bogdan, 17:04
- Re: Mathematical property vs. law vs. theorem, mathman, 17:03
- determination of amplifier gain function, Scott Kelley, 17:01
- Re: Trumanism and Churchill (not McCarthyism!), mathman, 16:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 16:57
- Re: 2 ring theory questions, lataianu bogdan, 16:48
- Re: Does the simultaneous gradient method converge to the saddle point?, Narasimham, 16:35
- Alternating group A_6: Does it have an order 72 subgroup?, Snis Pilbor, 16:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:03
- Re: Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, r . e . ballard, 15:33
- Re: 2 ring theory questions, Doug B, 15:03
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:58
- Re: a probability question?, Oscar Lanzi III, 14:52
- Re: C^k domains, David C . Ullrich, 14:45
- Re: Difference Between "a.e bounded function" and "a.e finite function", David C . Ullrich, 14:42
- Re: a probability question?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:38
- Since when have geeks concerned themselves with the layman ?, Jeff_Relf, 14:16
- Re: Optimization problem- Please help!! It's worth 3 extra points on my averag, Mkajuma, 14:11
- Re: Are the following set operations true?, Dan Christensen, 14:10
- Re: Are the following set operations true?, comtech, 13:57
- Re: Hypothenuse ;-), Oscar Lanzi III, 13:52
- Optimization problem- Please help!! It's worth 3 extra points on my averag, Evan Bell, 13:51
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:50
- Re: surface equivalence, Dr Tim, 13:45
- Re: Difference Between "a.e bounded function" and "a.e finite function", Confusing, 13:32
- Re: homomorphism ..., Arturo Magidin, 13:23
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Arturo Magidin, 13:17
- Re: Difference Between "a.e bounded function" and "a.e finite function", Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:14
- Re: FLT an incurable, unending addiction, Roman B. Binder, 13:09
- Re: Has anyone ever tried to solve Rubik's cube using fractals?, abe . buckingham, 13:03
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, scienstein, 13:01
- Re: path connectedness!, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:58
- Re: Difference Between "a.e bounded function" and "a.e finite function", gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:49
- Re: homomorphism ..., , 12:29
- Re: derived group, , 12:19
- Re: Q:The Mersenne Primes and the Collatz conjecture (3x+1)/2., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:17
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 12:02
- Re: derived group, Lee Rudolph, 12:01
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 11:58
- Re: C^k domains, Julien Santini, 11:51
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, casioculture, 11:50
- C^k domains, Julien Santini, 11:49
- Re: Hypothenuse ;-), Chip Eastham, 11:29
- homomorphism ..., HY, 11:12
- Re: Has anyone ever tried to solve Rubik's cube using fractals?, Jules, 11:09
- Re: Has anyone ever tried to solve Rubik's cube using fractals?, Jules, 11:08
- Re: derived group, HY, 10:57
- Difference Between "a.e bounded function" and "a.e finite function", Confusing, 10:47
- Re: 2 ring theory questions, Steven, 10:39
- Re: 2 ring theory questions, Steven, 10:35
- Gramian matrix, SusanP, 10:31
- Re: Suggestion for reading required, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 10:29
- Re: millenium prize for poincare conjecture, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 10:03
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 10:00
- Re: Limit Proofs, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:59
- Re: a probability question?, Joseph Fagan, 09:57
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, James Powell, 09:56
- Re: George Boole at the Restaurant, Joseph Fagan, 09:51
- Re: image v. range, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:49
- 2 ring theory questions, Doug B, 09:45
- Re: How to prove that polynomials uniformly converge to polynomial functions?, David C . Ullrich, 09:39
- Re: How to prove that polynomials uniformly converge to polynomial functions?, David C . Ullrich, 09:38
- Re: ? x^A*x and x*x^A, Oscar Lanzi III, 09:04
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, luiroto, 09:00
- Re: Mathematica question, David C . Ullrich, 08:54
- Click & Clack Puzzle from Dec. 1, W. Watson, 08:48
- Re: What's the relationship between having a fixed point and contraction mapping?, David C . Ullrich, 08:47
- Re: Is uniform convergent limit of uniform continuous functions uniform continuous?, David C . Ullrich, 08:44
- Re: Is this result generally true?, David C . Ullrich, 08:43
- Re: ? x^A*x and x*x^A, David C . Ullrich, 08:39
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, David C . Ullrich, 08:32
- Spectral Radius of Center Manifold, Seth, 08:27
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:11
- Has anyone ever tried to solve Rubik's cube using fractals?, TonyVarden, 08:09
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:14
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:10
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:10
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:06
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 06:58
- Re: recurrent sequence, William Elliot, 06:50
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 06:44
- Re: Cashbox withdrawal, Don Reble, 06:24
- Re: Hypothenuse ;-), Rainer Rosenthal, 06:05
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, G. A. Edgar, 06:02
- Re: path connectedness!, smn, 05:55
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Pierian Spring, 05:50
- Re: Cashbox withdrawal, kestrel, 05:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 05:26
- Re: Using sequence to define uniform continuous?, José Carlos Santos, 05:24
- Re: Hypothenuse ;-), quasi, 05:16
- Re: uniform convergence..., José Carlos Santos, 05:15
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Ian Johnston, 04:40
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Ian Johnston, 04:38
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Ian Johnston, 04:36
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Ian Johnston, 04:35
- Re: How to prove that polynomials uniformly converge to polynomial functions?, Virgil, 04:13
- uniform convergence..., comtech, 04:11
- How to prove that polynomials uniformly converge to polynomial functions?, comtech, 04:07
- Re: Quantized Geometrodynamic Area Flux Density 2-form, brian a m stuckless, 04:06
- Re: Is this result generally true?, Jules, 04:03
- Using sequence to define uniform continuous?, comtech, 03:57
- Re: George Boole at the Restaurant, William Elliot, 03:38
- Hypothenuse ;-), William Elliot, 03:34
- George Boole at the Restaurant, Gaspard Petit, 03:22
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 03:12
- Re: Lebesgue Integral of the Cantor Function, José Carlos Santos, 02:50
- Re: Hyperboloid model of hyerbolic plane, TCL, 02:47
- Re: Lebesgue Integral, José Carlos Santos, 02:32
- Re: Is this result generally true?, José Carlos Santos, 02:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 02:07
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Marius, 02:03
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Marius, 01:51
- Quantized Geometrodynamic Area Flux Density 2-form, Jack Sarfatti, 01:40
- Re: locally bdd function, additive, JimLong, 01:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:59
- Re: The set of All sets, zuhair, 00:48
- Re: locally bdd function, additive, Robert Israel, 00:44
- Re: locally bdd function, additive, JimLong, 00:24
- Re: a game -- splitting piles of stones, quasi, 00:05
- Re: Mathematica question, Someonekicked, 00:05
December 10, 2005
- Re: a game -- splitting piles of stones, Robert Israel, 23:54
- Re: Mathematica question, Someonekicked, 23:51
- Re: Are the following set operations true?, quasi, 23:51
- Re: locally bdd function, additive, Robert Israel, 23:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 23:40
- Re: Are the following set operations true?, William Elliot, 23:38
- a game -- splitting piles of stones, quasi, 23:31
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Daryl McCullough, 23:30
- Re: Are the following set operations true?, comtech, 23:22
- Re: Contraction mapping on wierd space?, William Elliot, 23:11
- Re: Are the following set operations true?, William Elliot, 23:09
- Re: locally bdd function, additive, JimLong, 22:59
- Are the following set operations true?, comtech, 22:47
- Re: Cartesian Rates to Angular Rates, William Elliot, 22:46
- Re: Cartesian Rates to Angular Rates, William Elliot, 22:42
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Russell Wallace, 22:41
- Atom/Electron System....Model shows variation Systems behavior, Zim Olson, 22:24
- Mathematical property vs. law vs. theorem, Kenneth Bull, 22:19
- Re: Trumanism and Churchill (not McCarthyism!), David Ames, 22:19
- Re: Hyperboloid model of hyerbolic plane, quasi, 22:18
- Re: Does the simultaneous gradient method converge to the saddle point?, Joe Zhang, 22:18
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Eric Gisse, 22:04
- Re: Prime ideal that is not maximal?, Dave Rusin, 22:02
- Examples? Infinite Random Series/Sequence., Zim Olson, 22:01
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, David Ames, 22:00
- Re: locally bdd function, additive, Mkajuma, 21:51
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Richard Henry, 21:34
- Re: Hyperboloid model of hyerbolic plane, TCL, 21:34
- Re: "preserved measure", Robert Israel, 21:18
- Re: Hyperboloid model of hyerbolic plane, Robert Israel, 21:07
- Re: ? probabilistic maths and deterministic maths, Chip Eastham, 21:06
- Re: Is this result generally true?, Jules, 20:27
- Re: Integral extensions/Finitely generated question, Bill Dubuque, 20:09
- Re: Cashbox withdrawal, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:04
- Re: Does the simultaneous gradient method converge to the saddle point?, Narasimham, 20:03
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Eric Gisse, 20:01
- Re: Prime ideal that is not maximal?, Arturo Magidin, 19:54
- Lebesgue Integral, Charlie Johnson, 19:43
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, david petry, 19:38
- Prime ideal that is not maximal?, Doug B, 19:35
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Robert Low, 19:35
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Robert Low, 19:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:31
- Re: Laplace transforms: a "pseudo-identity"?, david petry, 19:30
- ? probabilistic maths and deterministic maths, Cheng Cosine, 19:22
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:17
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 19:12
- Re: ? x^A*x and x*x^A, Cheng Cosine, 19:07
- Re: "preserved measure", mathman, 18:44
- Mathematica question, David Moran, 18:35
- "preserved measure", eduardomdiaz, 18:31
- Re: SOLVED! Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, The World Wide Wade, 18:21
- Re: Complex number and R^2, Bill Dubuque, 18:12
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
- Re: Cartesian Rates to Angular Rates, Makhno, 17:47
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, John B, 17:26
- Re: Q:The Mersenne Primes and the Collatz conjecture (3x+1)/2., Dan, 17:19
- Re: Is uniform convergent limit of uniform continuous functions uniform continuous?, A N Niel, 17:09
- Re: Limit Proofs, Luke Wu, 17:02
- Re: Can infinity be a fixed point?, José Carlos Santos, 17:01
- Re: Limit Proofs, Luke Wu, 16:52
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:44
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, 16:33
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, luiroto, 16:30
- Re: strange property of cantor set, Thomas Mautsch, 16:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:22
- Re: change of coordinates, David Moran, 16:03
- Re: ? x^A*x and x*x^A, David C . Ullrich, 15:56
- Re: Limit Proofs, Ronald Bruck, 15:53
- Re: conjetura de goldbach, Arturo Magidin, 15:45
- Does the simultaneous gradient method converge to the saddle point?, Joe Zhang, 15:38
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 15:38
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, John Porcella, 15:29
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich The Newsgroup Wacko, 15:17
- Cashbox withdrawal, kestrel, 15:15
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, 15:13
- change of coordinates, vsgdp, 14:52
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, John Porcella, 14:51
- Re: Can infinity be a fixed point?, G.E. Ivey, 14:42
- Re: What's the relationship between having a fixed point and contraction ma, Martin Wanvik, 14:38
- Re: Average chord, Virgil, 14:38
- Re: What's the relationship between having a fixed point and contraction mapping?, G.E. Ivey, 14:32
- path connectedness!, Tom Banks, 14:27
- Re: Can infinity be a fixed point?, José Carlos Santos, 14:17
- Re: What's the relationship between having a fixed point and contraction mapping?, Robert Low, 14:13
- Re: Is uniform convergent limit of uniform continuous functions uniform continuous?, José Carlos Santos, 14:10
- Re: Is this result generally true?, José Carlos Santos, 14:07
- Re: recurrent sequence, Chris, 14:06
- Contraction mapping on wierd space?, comtech, 14:05
- Re: Is this result generally true?, Ryan Reich, 14:03
- What's the relationship between having a fixed point and contraction mapping?, comtech, 13:56
- Can infinity be a fixed point?, comtech, 13:53
- Is uniform convergent limit of uniform continuous functions uniform continuous?, comtech, 13:45
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 13:43
- Is this result generally true?, comtech, 13:42
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 13:38
- Re: strange property of cantor set, GeorgeAlek, 13:23
- Re: Ed Barbeau's "Pell's Equation", rich burge, 13:12
- Re: The set of All sets, Lee Rudolph, 12:47
- Re: The set of All sets, zuhair, 12:44
- Re: Vectors in R^n and spans, José Carlos Santos, 12:35
- Re: Cartesian Rates to Angular Rates, Makhno, 12:34
- Vectors in R^n and spans, Carl R., 12:22
- Re: Can I have fries and a calculator with that?, Dave L. Renfro, 12:04
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, quasi, 12:00
- Re: Can I have fries and a calculator with that?, Dave L. Renfro, 11:48
- Re: Steiner Systems, , 11:45
- Re: Cartesian Rates to Angular Rates-, JEMebius, 11:41
- Re: Average chord, quasi, 11:08
- Re: recurrent sequence, Jules, 10:45
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:32
- Re: Can I have fries and a calculator with that?, Peter Webb, 10:08
- Re: How to prove that exp(x) is not uniform convergent in R?, Peter Allen, 09:28
- determining efficient subsets of vectors, Christoph Stark, 09:25
- Hyperboloid model of hyerbolic plane, TCL, 09:04
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:32
- Re: recurrent sequence, William Elliot, 08:28
- conjetura de goldbach, the grupttus, 08:27
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:20
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:11
- recurrent sequence, Chris, 08:04
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:59
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:56
- Re: Cartesian Rates to Angular Rates, William Elliot, 07:19
- Re: few problems in number theory, G. A. Edgar, 07:02
- Re: strange property of cantor set, A N Niel, 06:53
- Re: How to prove that exp(x) is not uniform convergent in R?, G. A. Edgar, 06:50
- Re: Laplace transforms: a "pseudo-identity"?, A N Niel, 06:35
- Cartesian Rates to Angular Rates, Makhno, 06:10
- Re: A number theory related problem, MuTsun Tsai, 05:48
- ? x^A*x and x*x^A, Cheng Cosine, 03:51
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Ian Johnston, 03:45
- Re: Can I have fries and a calculator with that?, Bill Dubuque, 03:22
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 03:21
- Re: Lebesgue Integral of the Cantor Function, Fola, 03:07
- Re: Lebesgue Integral of the Cantor Function, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:37
- Re: canonical texts in math, Niku, 02:32
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 02:27
- Re: Lebesgue Integral of the Cantor Function, Fola, 02:17
- Re: Proof of the Poincare Conjecture; my 1990's proof revised, a_plutonium, 02:02
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:01
- Re: Laplace transforms: a "pseudo-identity"?, kelvSYC, 01:58
- Re: Lebesgue Integral of the Cantor Function, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 01:55
- Lebesgue Integral of the Cantor Function, Fola, 01:42
- Re: Laplace transforms: a "pseudo-identity"?, Aage Andersen, 01:35
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Marius, 00:58
- Re: Average chord, Virgil, 00:50
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Marius, 00:50
- SOLVED! Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Charles McLane, 00:40
- Re: Axiomatic Set Theory and the Uniqueness of the Natural Numbers, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 00:39
December 09, 2005
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, Proginoskes, 23:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:51
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, casioculture, 23:48
- Re: Average chord, quasi, 23:25
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Narasimham, 23:16
- Re: Can I have fries and a calculator with that?, Virgil, 23:13
- Re: Average chord, Virgil, 23:10
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, casioculture, 23:10
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., smn, 22:56
- Re: extensions of Bezout's theorem to non-integer powers?, Dave Rusin, 22:53
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:50
- Re: Can I have fries and a calculator with that?, Kobu, 22:44
- Re: Infinite knight's tour?, cbrown, 22:32
- Re: Average chord, quasi, 22:27
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, quasi, 22:20
- Re: Average chord, Narasimham, 22:17
- Laplace transforms: a "pseudo-identity"?, kelvSYC, 22:11
- Re: integral help, jlundgren, 21:47
- Re: Axiomatic Set Theory and the Uniqueness of the Natural Numbers, MoeBlee, 21:20
- Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:09
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Herman Rubin, 20:59
- Re: regular polyhedra, and triangles [was: equilateral tringles], Thomas Mautsch, 20:52
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Herman Rubin, 20:50
- Re: Can I have fries and a calculator with that?, Dave L. Renfro, 20:44
- Re: Q:The Mersenne Primes and the Collatz conjecture (3x+1)/2., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:33
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., okthen, 19:58
- Re: Q:The Mersenne Primes and the Collatz conjecture (3x+1)/2., Dan, 19:56
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., smn, 19:54
- Re: Average chord, quasi, 19:53
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, 19:45
- Re: How to prove that exp(x) is not uniform convergent in R?, Peter L. Montgomery, 19:44
- Re: integral help, Jeff, 19:37
- Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism, casioculture, 19:33
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Proginoskes, 19:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:28
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Proginoskes, 19:28
- Re: How to prove that exp(x) is not uniform convergent in R?, Julien Santini, 19:28
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., smn, 19:26
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, quasi, 19:26
- Re: Average chord, ax@xxxxxxxxx, 19:21
- Re: integral help, Julien Santini, 19:21
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Arturo Magidin, 19:20
- How to prove that exp(x) is not uniform convergent in R?, comtech, 19:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:15
- integral help, Jeff, 19:15
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 19:08
- Re: Continuum hypothesis, Jules, 19:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 18:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 18:56
- Re: help me out with it, martin cohen, 18:56
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, NotP, 18:50
- Re: Axiomatic Set Theory and the Uniqueness of the Natural Numbers, Adam Burley, 18:46
- Re: Can I have fries and a calculator with that?, Virgil, 18:33
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Eric Gisse, 18:24
- Re: strange property of cantor set, GeorgeAlek, 18:22
- Re: Kronecker - God made "Die ganze Zahlen"., Roger Beresford, 18:18
- Re: Q:The Mersenne Primes and the Collatz conjecture (3x+1)/2., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:12
- Re: topology problem, W. Dale Hall, 18:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 18:08
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Eric Gisse, 18:08
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 18:07
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 18:07
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Proginoskes, 18:03
- Re: baye's Theorem: can normals and binary random vars get along?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 18:01
- Re: Iterated Powers of p-adics: Was: Re: Proof of the Poincare Conjecture; my 1990's proof revised, Proginoskes, 18:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 17:42
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Proginoskes, 17:23
- Re: Limit Proofs, Kobu, 17:23
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Proginoskes, 17:22
- Can I have fries and a calculator with that?, Dave L. Renfro, 17:13
- Re: Iterated Powers of p-adics: Was: Re: Proof of the Poincare Conjecture; my 1990's proof revised, Proginoskes, 17:12
- Re: Infinite knight's tour?, Mike Williams, 17:00
- Re: Stability of countries, Dave Rusin, 16:52
- Re: Stability of countries, Larry, 16:44
- Re: Infinite knight's tour?, Prai Jei, 16:19
- Robert Israel's correction to Self-Generating Holographic Multiverse, Jack Sarfatti, 16:14
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:11
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:11
- Re: topology problem, jade1378, 16:09
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, ArtflDodgr, 16:07
- Re: topology problem, Pawel Gladki, 15:42
- Re: isomorphism questions in abstract algebra, mskirvin, 15:39
- Re: isomorphism questions in abstract algebra, Arturo Magidin, 15:37
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:37
- Robert Israel is correct d^2(ThetaPhi) = 0, Jack Sarfatti, 15:34
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Barb Knox, 15:24
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, ArtflDodgr, 15:21
- isomorphism questions in abstract algebra, theturkishguy@xxxxxxxxx, 15:21
- Continuum hypothesis, Russell Wallace, 15:17
- Q:The Mersenne Primes and the Collatz conjecture (3x+1)/2., Dan, 15:13
- Re: convex set in topological vector space, Valeriu Anisiu, 15:02
- Re: few problems in number theory, Peter L. Montgomery, 14:50
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., okthen, 14:44
- Re: Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad, 14:41
- Re: Stability of countries, Phil Freedenberg, 14:38
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:37
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, Arturo Magidin, 14:35
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, PD, 14:31
- Re: Kronecker - God made "Die ganze Zahlen"., A N Niel, 14:15
- Re: topology problem, jade1378, 14:11
- Vectors in R^n and spans (please help), Carl R., 14:06
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, tadchem, 14:02
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, onehappymadman, 14:02
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Robert Israel, 13:59
- Extracting a signal from noise?, Martin, 13:52
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 13:38
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Robert Israel, 13:28
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Robert Israel, 13:21
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, ArtflDodgr, 13:17
- Re: POLYGONS!, David W . Cantrell, 13:15
- Re: urgent differential eqns help, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:14
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:12
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich The Newsgroup Wacko, 13:07
- Re: POLYGONS!, Keith A. Lewis, 13:02
- On The Self-Creating Holographic Multiverse, Jack Sarfatti, 13:02
- Re: Omar Khayyam, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:58
- Re: Curve fitting help needed, Duncan Muirhead, 12:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 12:50
- Re: topology problem, Pawel Gladki, 12:48
- Re: Curve fitting help needed, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 12:47
- Re: Infinite knight's tour?, Keith A. Lewis, 12:44
- Re: strange property of cantor set, Keith A. Lewis, 12:42
- Re: Need help with Calculus, Rob Johnson, 12:41
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:26
- Re: Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, David C. Ullrich, 12:24
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:23
- Re: Binary stored word addition, batman4050, 12:22
- Re: Kronecker - God made "Die ganze Zahlen"., richard miller, 12:22
- Re: Limit Proofs, Luke Wu, 12:21
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Ian Johnston, 12:20
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Randy Poe, 12:06
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:04
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, Chip Eastham, 12:02
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Randy Poe, 11:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 11:56
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Richard Henry, 11:54
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Pubkeybreaker, 11:52
- Re: Curve fitting help needed, Phil Sherrod, 11:50
- Re: Example of a Vector Space which cannot be made into an inner product space, A K L, 11:43
- Re: Steiner Systems, , 11:40
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, quasi, 11:39
- POLYGONS!, John Doe, 11:39
- Re: is this as easy as i think? finite complement topology, Arturo Magidin, 11:39
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, onehappymadman, 11:37
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Dave Rusin, 11:37
- Why to accept that the present set of arithmetical axioms are sufficient?, luiroto, 11:34
- Re: millenium prize for poincare conjecture, Chan-Ho Suh, 11:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 11:32
- Re: Curve fitting help needed, Rod, 11:32
- Re: few problems in number theory, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 11:29
- Re: Need help with Calculus, Rick Decker, 11:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:26
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, quasi, 11:25
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:23
- Re: strange property of cantor set, Thomas Mautsch, 11:22
- Re: Binary stored word addition, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 11:21
- Curve fitting help needed, Nicros, 11:19
- Re: Need help with Calculus, Rob Johnson, 11:17
- Re: Infinite knight's tour?, Keith A. Lewis, 11:14
- Re: fourth moment of a normal variable, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:04
- Omar Khayyam, Jim Ferry, 11:03
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Gib Bogle, 10:58
- Re: strange property of cantor set, Dave L. Renfro, 10:50
- Re: strange property of cantor set, José Carlos Santos, 10:50
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, luiroto, 10:39
- Re: Question on polynomial solvability by elementary funcs., Igor Khavkine, 10:36
- fourth moment of a normal variable, oercim, 10:32
- Re: if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Randy Poe, 10:27
- strange property of cantor set, berthuffman, 10:24
- if a + b + ... + c = d then NOT f(a) + f(b) + ... + f(c) = f(d)?, Marius, 10:04
- Re: is this as easy as i think? finite complement topology, Martin Wanvik, 09:56
- Re: Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad, 09:45
- Re: Need help with Calculus, Rick Decker, 09:44
- Get nominated for a degr3e, "Lupe Ricks", 09:34
- Re: convex set in topological vector space, David C . Ullrich, 09:10
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., David C . Ullrich, 08:58
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, tadchem, 08:58
- ? x^A*x and x*x^A, Cheng Cosine, 08:50
- Re: is this as easy as i think? finite complement topology, Bob, 08:50
- Re: is this as easy as i think? finite complement topology, Martin Wanvik, 08:28
- Re: Fields-finitely generated and finite dimensional, Arturo Magidin, 08:26
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, Bill Dubuque, 08:11
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, G. A. Edgar, 08:10
- Re: A number theory related problem, , 08:04
- Re: Fields-finitely generated and finite dimensional, quasi, 07:27
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:16
- Re: is this as easy as i think? finite complement topology, Bob, 07:12
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:12
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:08
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:04
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:02
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 06:57
- Re: Proof of the Poincare Conjecture; my 1990's proof revised, Dik T. Winter, 06:47
- Re: How to cheat in exams using mobile phones and calculators, Ian Johnston, 06:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, H. J. Sander Bruggink, 06:40
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Dik T. Winter, 06:39
- Re: Groups (ENS exam), , 06:22
- Re: Fields-finitely generated and finite dimensional, Bill Dubuque, 06:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 06:16
- Re: Steiner Systems, , 05:50
- Re: Is the group Z x Z cyclic?, Bill Dubuque, 05:44
- Re: Homomorphisms, Eric, 05:38
- Re: Kronecker - God made "Die ganze Zahlen"., Lee Rudolph, 05:34
- Re: Homomorphisms, quasi, 05:24
- Kronecker - God made "Die ganze Zahlen"., Roger Beresford, 05:05
- Homomorphisms, Eric, 05:02
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., smn, 05:01
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., smn, 04:53
- Re: help me out with it, VijaKhara, 04:40
- help me out with it, VijaKhara, 04:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 04:35
- Re: convex set in topological vector space, Karel, 04:28
- urgent differential eqns help, jaspal, 04:18
- December caption, JohnS, 04:08
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., okthen, 03:58
- Re: convex set in topological vector space, William Elliot, 03:37
- Re: Average chord, William Elliot, 03:33
- convex set in topological vector space, Karel, 03:05
- Re: Iterated Powers of p-adics: Was: Re: Proof of the Poincare Conjecture; my 1990's proof revised, a_plutonium, 03:02
- Re: few problems in number theory, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 02:55
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 02:55
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 02:49
- Re: optimizing a mixed strategy, Daniel, 02:25
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Torkel Franzen, 02:18
- Help!!!, mathforsweta@xxxxxxxxx, 02:18
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:15
- Re: Discussion with Robert Israel on non-closed exact forms, donstockbauer, 02:15
- topology problem, jade1378, 02:12
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 02:12
- Discussion with Robert Israel on non-closed exact forms, Jack Sarfatti, 02:00
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 01:58
- Re: optimizing a mixed strategy, Robert Vienneau, 01:50
- Re: Average chord, quasi, 01:49
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Ronald Bruck, 01:43
- Math question on solving coupled differential equations with matrices, vze2vt56, 01:42
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:33
- Re: Average chord, William Elliot, 01:33
- Re: angle bisector proof, William Elliot, 01:31
- Re: Need help with Calculus, Narasimham, 01:29
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, quasi, 01:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 01:24
- Re: Average chord, Anon, 01:23
- Re: Average chord, Narasimham, 01:10
- Re: Help on a matrix problem, mskirvin, 01:02
- Re: angle bisector proof, Narasimham, 00:54
- Re: Average chord, quasi, 00:50
- Re: Average chord, quasi, 00:42
- Non-closed exact forms, Jack Sarfatti, 00:35
- optimizing a mixed strategy, Daniel, 00:22
- Average chord, ax@xxxxxxxxx, 00:21
- Help on a matrix problem, akinatsu, 00:15
December 08, 2005
- Re: analysis (?), Carlos Moreno, 23:48
- Re: Limit Proofs, Carlos Moreno, 23:46
- Re: angle bisector proof, Ted Hwa, 23:39
- Re: angle bisector proof, Bob, 23:36
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Ronald Bruck, 23:33
- Re: problem in group theory, mskirvin, 23:31
- Re: angle bisector proof, Ronald Bruck, 23:28
- Re: Even CEOs consult us., Colleyville Alan, 23:19
- Re: Need help with Calculus, William Elliot, 23:15
- Re: Need help with Calculus, William Elliot, 23:10
- Re: Work of Zygmund, Banach, Kuratowski, etc ..., Julien Santini, 23:04
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Keith Williams, 23:01
- Re: few problems in number theory, Dave Rusin, 22:59
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., Gerry Myerson, 22:53
- Non-closed exact p-forms?, Jack Sarfatti, 22:46
- angle bisector proof, Bob, 22:46
- Re: Is the group Z x Z cyclic?, William Elliot, 22:43
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:31
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 22:30
- Re: regular polyhedra, and triangles [was: equilateral tringles], Dave Rusin, 22:29
- Re: Work of Zygmund, Banach, Kuratowski, etc ..., john_ramsden, 22:12
- Re: few problems in number theory, Peter L. Montgomery, 22:05
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Mary Kizer, 22:04
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties? No solution yet., The World Wide Wade, 21:39
- Re: Work of Zygmund, Banach, Kuratowski, etc ..., Dave L. Renfro, 21:38
- Re: Need help with Calculus, Narasimham, 21:37
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:28
- Re: problem in group theory, tinaimp88, 21:28
- Infinite knight's tour?, w . taylor, 21:28
- Re: problem in group theory, mskirvin, 21:23
- Re: Groups (ENS exam), Julien Santini, 21:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:15
- Re: FLT case 1, Gerry Myerson, 21:14
- Re: Generalized Fundamentaal Theorem of Algebra, david petry, 21:13
- Re: Groups (ENS exam), Ken Pledger, 21:07
- Re: Interpolation for rational functions, Lee Rudolph, 21:05
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 21:04
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Herman Rubin, 20:54
- Question on polynomial solvability by elementary funcs., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:50
- Re: millenium prize for poincare conjecture, marko_amnell, 20:46
- Re: Need help with Calculus, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:35
- Re: problem in group theory, Arturo Magidin, 20:24
- Re: Trumanism and Churchill (not McCarthyism!), mathman, 20:20
- Re: problem in group theory, abe . buckingham, 20:19
- Re: analysis (?), Someonekicked, 20:13
- Re: analysis (?), TCL, 20:11
- Re: is this as easy as i think? finite complement topology, Arturo Magidin, 20:04
- Re: problem in group theory, mskirvin, 20:03
- Re: is this as easy as i think? finite complement topology, Arturo Magidin, 20:01
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 19:48
- Re: probability problem, Pink Magic, 19:45
- problem in group theory, tinaimp88, 19:31
- Re: few problems in number theory, David Ames, 19:28
- Re: few problems in number theory, Greenleaf, 19:28
- Re: millenium prize for poincare conjecture, Larry Hammick, 19:26
- analysis (?), Someonekicked, 19:25
- Re: Interpolation for rational functions, Gerry Myerson, 19:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 19:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:02
- Re: condition on entire function..., graumet, 18:59
- Re: Limit Proofs, Kobu, 18:59
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., okthen, 18:56
- Iterated Powers of p-adics: Was: Re: Proof of the Poincare Conjecture; my 1990's proof revised, Proginoskes, 18:54
- Re: Limit Proofs, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 18:52
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:51
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., smn, 18:50
- Work of Zygmund, Banach, Kuratowski, etc ..., Julien Santini, 18:47
- multivariable fitting problem, JustinLeeTurner, 18:46
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 18:43
- Groups (ENS exam), Julien Santini, 18:38
- Re: Residue theorem for a non-simple piecewise smooth path, Julien Santini, 18:34
- Limit Proofs, tlicious, 18:31
- Re: derived group, Gerry Myerson, 18:25
- Finding an interval, mathforsweta@xxxxxxxxx, 18:22
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 18:21
- Re: Residue theorem for a non-simple piecewise smooth path, David C . Ullrich, 18:19
- Re: A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., Gerry Myerson, 18:19
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Gerry Myerson, 18:16
- Re: Is the group Z x Z cyclic?, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 18:14
- Re: A proposition about graph theory, José Carlos Santos, 18:06
- Re: Magic Numbers ..., Proginoskes, 18:06
- Re: Fields-finitely generated and finite dimensional, David C . Ullrich, 18:04
- Swiss watches - replica, "Steven A. Norman", 18:04
- Re: A question on notation, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:03
- Re: ? avoid zero e-value, Hero, 18:00
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Lee Rudolph, 17:59
- Re: Fields-finitely generated and finite dimensional, JoeS, 17:58
- Re: is this as easy as i think? finite complement topology, Bob, 17:54
- Re: Need help with Calculus, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 17:53
- Re: Collatz primes of the form -- (2^n*10-1)/3, Dan, 17:52
- Re: Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Keith A. Lewis, 17:46
- Re: is this as easy as i think? finite complement topology, Bob, 17:45
- Re: millenium prize for poincare conjecture, Lee Rudolph, 17:41
- Re: ? avoid zero e-value, Robert Israel, 17:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:25
- Re: preimage under a non-injective function = sensical?, Arturo Magidin, 17:22
- Re: ? avoid zero e-value, Cheng Cosine, 17:15
- millenium prize for poincare conjecture, bijan, 17:13
- Re: Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad, 16:56
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Dave Rusin, 16:56
- preimage under a non-injective function = sensical?, Kenneth Bull, 16:54
- Is there a natural phenomena which defines the Normal Curve?, Brablo, 16:49
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 16:47
- Re: Residue theorem for a non-simple piecewise smooth path, Robert Israel, 16:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:33
- Re: Fields-finitely generated and finite dimensional, JoeS, 16:28
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Eric Gisse, 16:15
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:14
- MS Office XP Pro $49.95 Windows, "Ellen Marx", 15:51
- Re: Need help with Calculus, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:48
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Ken Taylor, 15:38
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, 15:33
- Residue theorem for a non-simple piecewise smooth path, Julien Santini, 15:32
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, 15:31
- A question on "finite substes of an infinite set"., okthen, 15:30
- Re: A proposition about graph theory, Ken Pledger, 15:11
- Re: A mass is an unspecified quantity of matter, Don1, 15:05
- Re: A cheap Fractional Calculus book?, A N Niel, 15:01
- A question on notation, USENET, 14:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 14:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:38
- Re: few problems in number theory, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 14:31
- Re: Need help with Calculus, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:18
- limit point compact, Jonas, 14:14
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:06
- A proposition about graph theory, José Carlos Santos, 13:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:38
- Re: ? avoid zero e-value, Robert Israel, 13:33
- Re: surface equivalence, quasi, 13:28
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, mmeron, 13:28
- Re: few problems in number theory, Robert Israel, 13:26
- Re: derived group, , 13:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:26
- Re: Need help with Calculus, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 13:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:11
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:02
- Re: Proof of the Poincare Conjecture; my 1990's proof revised, a_plutonium, 12:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:24
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 12:02
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 11:55
- Re: A cheap Fractional Calculus book?, alexandru . lupas, 11:52
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:47
- Re: Question to Jose Carlos Santos (vector spaces), José Carlos Santos, 11:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Chris Menzel, 11:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 11:41
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:38
- Need help with Calculus, Alok, 11:32
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Randy Poe, 11:22
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:20
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Phil Carmody, 11:16
- Question to Jose Carlos Santos (vector spaces), Carl R., 11:16
- Re: derived group, Lee Rudolph, 11:10
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:04
- Re: Negating the statement of "equicontinuous"?-, JEMebius, 10:55
- Re: A cheap Fractional Calculus book?, Han de Bruijn, 10:52
- derived group, HY, 10:42
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:27
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:24
- Maxwell-Wien bridge..., No Way, 10:21
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:18
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 10:12
- Re: Fibred knots/links, Lee Rudolph, 10:08
- tree of mathematical categories, tone.skoda@xxxxxxxxx, 10:02
- Re: few problems in number theory, temptony, 09:46
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 09:43
- Re: Fields-finitely generated and finite dimensional, David C . Ullrich, 09:32
- Re: Generalized Fundamentaal Theorem of Algebra, David C . Ullrich, 09:16
- Re: condition on entire function..., David C . Ullrich, 09:03
- Re: wanna simple equations?, David Hartley, 09:02
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:54
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, David C . Ullrich, 08:54
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:52
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, David C . Ullrich, 08:50
- Re: Axiomatic Set Theory and the Uniqueness of the Natural Numbers, Adam Burley, 08:49
- A cheap Fractional Calculus book?, Henri Tapani Heinonen, 08:34
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Robert Low, 08:29
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Pat Ford, 08:26
- Re: ? avoid zero e-value, Cheng Cosine, 08:24
- Magic Numbers ..., Gary, 08:18
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, A N Niel, 08:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 08:15
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:05
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:03
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:00
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:59
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:55
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:53
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:52
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:50
- A Hilbert matrix problem, olejman, 07:50
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 07:39
- Re: Motivation between sheafs and category theory, Lukas Horosiewicz, 07:28
- Re: Motivation between sheafs and category theory, Jose Capco, 07:15
- Re: A prime number theory related question, Ricky R., 07:13
- Complex Geometry, Lukas Horosiewicz, 07:08
- Re: the power of cyclic subgroups (a proposal), Gottfried Helms, 06:56
- Re: Motivation between sheafs and category theory, Lukas Horosiewicz, 06:52
- Re: Motivation between sheafs and category theory, Lukas Horosiewicz, 06:40
- Fibred knots/links, zeroSpamNotLesttype, 06:30
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Rob Johnson, 06:28
- A prime number theory related question, Ricky R., 06:23
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 06:22
- Re: few problems in number theory, dwwdkddb, 06:15
- Motivation between sheafs and category theory, Jose Capco, 06:09
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, Robert Low, 05:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, albstorz, 04:28
- Re: wanna simple equations?, Anon, 04:08
- A number theory related problem, MuTsun Tsai, 03:46
- Fields-finitely generated and finite dimensional, BUFFE420@xxxxxxx, 03:43
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Virgil, 03:26
- Re: few problems in number theory, William Elliot, 03:10
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, mzafrullah, 02:51
- Re: computing geodesics, geodesic distance algorithms, Mathlete4STAR, 02:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:06
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 01:53
- wanna simple equations?, yakuza, 01:46
- Re: easiest and shortest proof of Jordan Curve theorem, a_plutonium, 01:37
- Re: Group Theory Proof., magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:37
- Re: Smooth map problem, Proginoskes, 01:07
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Proginoskes, 01:03
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:54
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Stephen M. Fortescue, 00:41
- universal cover, Kauro, 00:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:25
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 00:05
- Re: surface equivalence, Gerry Myerson, 00:01
December 07, 2005
- Re: Smooth map problem, quasi, 23:51
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties? No solution yet., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 23:34
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Gerry Myerson, 23:31
- Re: Integral closedness question, quasi, 23:12
- Re: ? avoid zero e-value, Gerry Myerson, 23:11
- Re: Infinite knight's tour?, Richard Heathfield, 23:11
- Re: Group Theory Proof., tinaimp88, 23:05
- Re: probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 23:03
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 23:02
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 22:55
- Re: Suggestion for reading required, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:52
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 22:51
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 22:45
- ? avoid zero e-value, Cheng Cosine, 22:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 22:39
- Re: Interesting problem? Or a standard probability problem?, Robert Israel, 22:38
- Re: Group Theory Proof., magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 22:38
- Re: Smooth map problem, quasi, 22:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 22:31
- Re: Infinite knight's tour?, Rich Grise, 22:29
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 22:24
- Re: Integral closedness question, Arturo Magidin, 22:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 22:22
- Re: few problems in number theory, Peter L. Montgomery, 22:20
- Re: Interesting problem? Or a standard probability problem?, quasi, 22:17
- Re: few problems in number theory, pauldepstein, 22:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 22:05
- Re: Ed Barbeau's "Pell's Equation", rich burge, 22:02
- Re: few problems in number theory, Dave Rusin, 21:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 21:52
- Re: Integral extensions/Finitely generated question, quasi, 21:51
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:47
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:46
- Re: probability problem, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:45
- Re: probability problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:44
- Re: probability problem, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 21:43
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:43
- Re: few problems in number theory, pauldepstein, 21:43
- Re: Generalized Fundamentaal Theorem of Algebra, Lee Rudolph, 21:40
- Re: Binary stored word addition, William Elliot, 21:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 21:33
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 21:33
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 21:32
- Re: few problems in number theory, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 21:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 21:29
- Re: Wilson's theorem, cbrown, 21:27
- Re: Wilson's theorem, cbrown, 21:26
- Re: Smooth map problem, stupidG, 21:26
- Interesting problem? Or a standard probability problem?, Carlos Moreno, 21:26
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Proginoskes, 21:25
- Re: few problems in number theory, pauldepstein, 21:25
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:24
- Re: FLT an incurable, unending addiction, Dik T. Winter, 21:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 21:22
- Re: probability problem, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:14
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Rich Grise, 21:11
- Re: few problems in number theory, William Elliot, 21:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 21:03
- Re: few problems in number theory, dwwdkddb, 20:56
- Re: FLT an incurable, unending addiction, Dik T. Winter, 20:52
- Re: few problems in number theory, dwwdkddb, 20:47
- Re: Smooth map problem, The World Wide Wade, 20:46
- Re: Integral closedness question, quasi, 20:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 20:27
- Re: probability problem, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:26
- Re: few problems in number theory, pauldepstein, 20:17
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 20:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 20:15
- Re: few problems in number theory, David Ames, 20:12
- Re: few problems in number theory, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 20:06
- probability problem, Greenleaf, 19:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 19:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:21
- few problems in number theory, Greenleaf, 19:19
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 18:56
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Robert J. Kolker, 18:45
- Re: Simple proof, Fermat, 18:21
- Smooth map problem, stupidG, 18:17
- Re: Binary stored word addition, batman4050, 18:16
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Proginoskes, 18:12
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Rob Johnson, 18:09
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Proginoskes, 18:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Nam Nguyen, 17:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 17:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 17:32
- Re: Binary stored word addition, Keith A. Lewis, 17:21
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:04
- Re: A functional-differential equation, Dave Rusin, 16:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:57
- Re: easiest and shortest proof of Jordan Curve theorem, Proginoskes, 16:55
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties? No solution yet., Charles McLane, 16:54
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:52
- Re: proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes, 16:49
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:48
- Re: Group Theory Proof., tinaimp88, 16:41
- Re: Wilson's theorem, david petry, 16:38
- Re: condition on entire function..., david petry, 16:27
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:23
- Re: Suggestion for reading required, Fred Stevens, 16:03
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, Arturo Magidin, 16:01
- Re: Simple proof, Randy Poe, 16:01
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 15:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 15:58
- Re: Is U(H) weakly closed?, Giorgio Casinovi, 15:53
- Re: Math Problem, Surendar Jeyadev, 15:53
- the power of cyclic subgroups (a proposal), Gottfried Helms, 15:52
- Re: bound on eigenvalues..., Robert Low, 15:49
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, Arturo Magidin, 15:49
- A question about n-fold torus, ememy, 15:46
- Re: Suggestion for reading required, Robert Low, 15:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 15:43
- Re: bound on eigenvalues..., comtech, 15:42
- Binary stored word addition, batman4050, 15:40
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, comtech, 15:34
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, comtech, 15:32
- Re: Suggestion for reading required, Fermat, 15:30
- Re: Simple proof, Fermat, 15:26
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Eric Gisse, 15:26
- Re: FLT an incurable, unending addiction, Fermat, 15:25
- Re: Simple proof, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 15:23
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Chris Menzel, 15:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:12
- Re: Group Theory Proof., Arturo Magidin, 15:05
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, agentmath, 15:02
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 15:01
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, The World Wide Wade, 14:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:56
- Group Theory Proof., tinaimp88, 14:53
- Suggestion for reading required, lhr_cool_guy, 14:50
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:43
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:40
- Simple proof, Fermat, 14:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:34
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, markp, 14:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:30
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 14:26
- Re: BFGS C Code, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:23
- Re: concerning the gateaux derivative, Robert Israel, 14:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 14:07
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, agentmath, 14:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:03
- Re: Integral extensions/Finitely generated question, James, 14:03
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, agentmath, 14:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:58
- Re: super exponential growth?, Enough Already, 13:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 13:53
- Re: image v. range, wwromeo, 13:53
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 13:47
- Re: Integral extensions/Finitely generated question, mskirvin, 13:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:42
- Re: super exponential growth?, Enough Already, 13:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:28
- proof or disproof of Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium, 13:27
- Re: Integral closedness question, dgiaimo@xxxxxxxxx, 13:25
- Re: inverse of f(x) = e^x + x + 3, Ioannis, 13:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:16
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, donstockbauer, 13:11
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Michael A. Terrell, 13:07
- Re: E' of E = t*k*p, Keith A. Lewis, 13:05
- Integral extensions/Finitely generated question, James, 13:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:57
- Re: Infinite knight's tour?, Keith A. Lewis, 12:56
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 12:51
- Re: inverse of f(x) = e^x + x + 3, wwromeo, 12:51
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:49
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 12:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 12:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 12:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:22
- Re: FERMAT LAST THEOREM, Roman B. Binder, 12:18
- Re: taking root of both sides - reversible?, Keith A. Lewis, 12:18
- Re: Math Problem, Narasimham, 12:18
- Re: Even CEOs consult us., kiru . sengal, 12:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:10
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:09
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:58
- Re: getting more familiar with gaussian primes, Arturo Magidin, 11:53
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:53
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Keith Williams, 11:51
- Re: concerning the gateaux derivative, Dusan, 11:50
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Richard Henry, 11:47
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Keith Williams, 11:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:36
- Empirically measure convexity of a data series, Chris, 11:34
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, David R Tribble, 11:22
- Re: Fixed points: real-projective plane, Dave Rusin, 11:10
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 11:09
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 11:08
- Integral closedness question, James, 11:05
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 11:01
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, John Larkin, 10:59
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Keith Williams, 10:59
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 10:56
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 10:54
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Keith Williams, 10:53
- Re: BFGS C Code, Jan van der Peet, 10:50
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:48
- Re: concerning the gateaux derivative, Jiri Lebl, 10:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 10:46
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, markp, 10:35
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 10:33
- Re: FERMAT LAST THEOREM, quasi, 10:32
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, GregS, 10:31
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Randy Poe, 10:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:18
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Jeff, 10:18
- Re: E' of E = t*k*p, Jules, 10:13
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 10:07
- Re: Even CEOs consult us., BEM, 10:06
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, GregS, 09:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:56
- concerning the gateaux derivative, Dusan, 09:55
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Fred Bloggs, 09:55
- Re: Generalized Fundamentaal Theorem of Algebra, GeorgeAlek, 09:54
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:42
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:37
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Mark Fergerson, 09:36
- Re: Intervals and 'squares' of certainty, Robert Low, 09:09
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 09:06
- Re: Intervals and 'squares' of certainty, asafspades, 09:03
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 09:01
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:44
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:41
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:37
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:33
- Re: Negating the statement of "equicontinuous"?, David C . Ullrich, 08:32
- Re: Proving that D is B's closure, and proving D is B's interior?, David C . Ullrich, 08:30
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:30
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:28
- Re: Generalized Fundamentaal Theorem of Algebra, David C . Ullrich, 08:25
- Re: condition on entire function..., David C . Ullrich, 08:23
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, jmfbahciv, 08:20
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, albstorz, 08:11
- Re: Extension Fields Proofs, eugene, 08:10
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, David C . Ullrich, 08:05
- Re: Extension Fields Proofs, Toni Lassila, 08:00
- Re: Eqation of line, incon, 07:49
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, markp, 07:42
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 07:38
- Re: getting more familiar with gaussian primes, Gottfried Helms, 07:28
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, PeteS, 07:23
- Re: getting more familiar with gaussian primes, Gottfried Helms, 07:23
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 07:14
- Even CEOs consult us., "Leonard Raymond", 07:11
- Re: What is the definition of A is dense in B?, José Carlos Santos, 07:02
- Re: getting more familiar with gaussian primes, Gottfried Helms, 07:02
- Re: basic question about metric space... is a distance metric continuous function?, José Carlos Santos, 07:01
- Re: extensions of Bezout's theorem to non-integer powers?, c.rowat@xxxxxxxxxx, 06:51
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 06:43
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Pubkeybreaker, 06:42
- Re: E' of E = t*k*p, Robert Low, 06:36
- lambda calculus tutorial, species8350, 06:34
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Pooh Bear, 06:20
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Pooh Bear, 06:19
- E' of E = t*k*p, erehwon, 06:18
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Pooh Bear, 06:11
- Re: Negating the statement of "equicontinuous"?, smn, 06:00
- Re: subfield of rational numbers, , 04:58
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:58
- Re: Proving that D is B's closure, and proving D is B's interior?, Robert Low, 04:52
- Negating the statement of "equicontinuous"?, comtech, 04:45
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Dr Photon, 04:42
- Proving that D is B's closure, and proving D is B's interior?, comtech, 04:41
- differentiation, erehwon, 04:38
- What is the definition of A is dense in B?, comtech, 04:36
- Re: basic question about metric space... is a distance metric continuous function?, comtech, 04:34
- Re: inverse of f(x) = e^x + x + 3, Ioannis, 04:06
- Re: Extension Fields Proofs, BUFFE420@xxxxxxx, 04:02
- Infinite knight's tour?, w . taylor, 03:38
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Deefoo, 03:35
- Re: Intervals and 'squares' of certainty, Robert Low, 03:35
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 03:32
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Pooh Bear, 03:29
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Pooh Bear, 03:28
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Pooh Bear, 03:26
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Pooh Bear, 03:24
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Eric Gisse, 03:23
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Pooh Bear, 03:22
- Re: Extension Fields Proofs, BUFFE420@xxxxxxx, 03:12
- Re: condition on entire function..., The World Wide Wade, 03:11
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Chris Menzel, 03:05
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Robert Israel, 02:56
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, The World Wide Wade, 02:56
- Re: equilateral tringles, Virgil, 02:41
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Michael A. Terrell, 02:40
- Re: FERMAT LAST THEOREM, byafet, 02:33
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, r.e.s., 02:30
- Re: group action, eugene, 02:30
- Re: Extension Fields Proofs, eugene, 02:18
- Re: Intervals and 'squares' of certainty, Robert Israel, 02:17
- Re: Is U(H) weakly closed?, Robert Israel, 02:15
- Re: ? avoid zero e-value, Robert Israel, 01:58
- Re: Toplitz like systems, Robert Israel, 01:56
- Re: inverse of f(x) = e^x + x + 3, wwromeo, 01:55
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Proginoskes, 01:51
- Re: limits of non-functions (relations), Kobu, 01:30
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 01:28
- taking root of both sides - reversible?, Kobu, 01:15
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Ralph Wade Phillips, 01:01
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 00:57
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 00:51
- Re: Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 00:47
- Re: how are all the different types of mathematics related?, deniz . bahar, 00:44
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 00:25
- Re: Wilson's theorem, cbrown, 00:22
- Does a simple function exixt with these properties?, Charles McLane, 00:18
- Re: Intervals and 'squares' of certainty, asafspades, 00:09
- Extension Fields Proofs, michael . esposito, 00:06
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:02
December 06, 2005
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, onehappymadman, 23:58
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, onehappymadman, 23:54
- Re: Fields Medal Laurent Lafforgue forced to resign from HCE, Michel Delord, 23:49
- Re: Intervals and 'squares' of certainty, asafspades, 23:40
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Eric Gisse, 23:32
- Re: Intervals and 'squares' of certainty, asafspades, 23:32
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 23:32
- Re: Generalized Fundamentaal Theorem of Algebra, Dave Rusin, 23:26
- Re: Question on Homotopy Classes, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 23:16
- Re: equilateral tringles, Dave Rusin, 23:07
- Generalized Fundamentaal Theorem of Algebra, GeorgeAlek, 23:07
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Gregory L. Hansen, 23:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:03
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, R. Pierce Butler, 22:54
- Re: Hofstadter Move?, Matt Noonan, 22:53
- Re: baye's Theorem: can normals and binary random vars get along?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:40
- Re: limits of non-functions (relations), William Elliot, 22:17
- Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Sam Wormley, 22:08
- Representation in enriched category theory, No One, 22:07
- why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, onehappymadman, 21:29
- condition on entire function..., graumet, 21:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 21:15
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:14
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:09
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, imaginatorium, 21:01
- Re: basic Mandelbrot question, mazik72, 20:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 20:44
- Re: Question on Homotopy Classes, Lee Rudolph, 20:37
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 20:31
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, martin cohen, 20:25
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 20:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 20:02
- Re: Homotopy Question, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 19:54
- Question on Homotopy Classes, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 19:53
- bluman and kumei, rancid moth, 19:48
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 19:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 19:42
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 19:40
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 19:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:07
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 19:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 18:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 18:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 18:48
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:43
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 18:43
- Re: Math Problem, LC Killingbeck, 18:34
- Re: Hofstadter Move?, r.e.s., 18:31
- Re: Wilson's theorem, david petry, 18:28
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 18:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Barb Knox, 18:23
- Is U(H) weakly closed?, Giorgio Casinovi, 18:19
- Re: inverse of f(x) = e^x + x + 3, Anon, 17:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 17:56
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 17:56
- Re: Math Problem, fishfry, 17:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 17:33
- limits of non-functions (relations), Kobu, 17:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 17:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 17:26
- Re: Homotopy Question, Ed Hook, 17:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 17:24
- Re: how are all the different types of mathematics related?, Kobu, 17:21
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 17:06
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 17:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 17:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 17:00
- ? avoid zero e-value, Cheng Cosine, 16:55
- Re: Bounded Rearragement, Albert, 16:53
- Toplitz like systems, frs, 16:51
- Re: getting more familiar with gaussian primes, JoeS, 16:46
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 16:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, William Hughes, 16:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:29
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:23
- Re: A transformation problem, WIldhagensux, 16:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:21
- Re: subfield of rational numbers, Bill Dubuque, 16:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:18
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:11
- Re: Math Problem, Peter L. Montgomery, 16:05
- Re: subfield of rational numbers, Dave Rusin, 16:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 15:59
- Re: getting more familiar with gaussian primes, Arturo Magidin, 15:52
- Re: Math Problem, Keith A. Lewis, 15:52
- Re: Proof of the Poincare Conjecture; my 1990's proof revised, a_plutonium, 15:47
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 15:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:43
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:41
- Re: getting more familiar with gaussian primes, Keith A. Lewis, 15:37
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:34
- Re: Math Problem, Randy Poe, 15:34
- Re: Topologically what is a torus in 2-d; difference between torus and sphe, a_plutonium, 15:32
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:31
- Re: Simple, write to the FTC on Google, Proginoskes, 15:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:21
- Re: baye's Theorem: can normals and binary random vars get along?, Rob Johnson, 15:15
- Math Problem, PaulHjelmstad, 15:13
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 15:07
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:03
- Re: Eqation of line, Randy Poe, 15:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:00
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:51
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 14:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:45
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:30
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Nam Nguyen, 14:27
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:26
- getting more familiar with gaussian primes, Gottfried Helms, 14:21
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 14:05
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:03
- TRANSFORME R$6,00 EMR$6.000.000 EM POUQUISSÍMO TEMPO!!!!!, taca, 13:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Matt Gutting, 13:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:46
- PLANCK alien CONTACT c.!!, brian a m stuckless, 13:43
- Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism, Wolf Kirchmeir, 13:43
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, William Hughes, 13:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 13:40
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, mzafrullah, 13:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:34
- Re: How to generate a random irreducible polynomial in GF[2], Robert Israel, 13:32
- Re: group action, José Carlos Santos, 13:30
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 13:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:15
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:10
- Homotopy Question, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 13:03
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:00
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, mzafrullah, 12:57
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, Dave Rusin, 12:56
- Re: Some more novel dice questions, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:54
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:53
- Re: Eqation of line, Dave, 12:46
- Re: bound on eigenvalues..., Robert Israel, 12:36
- Re: subfield of rational numbers, , 12:25
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, Keith A. Lewis, 12:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:19
- Re: group action, , 12:14
- Re: group action, , 12:13
- Re: Interpolation for rational functions, Raymond Manzoni, 11:45
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:45
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 11:43
- Re: Interpolation for rational functions, Raymond Manzoni, 11:36
- Re: Simple, write to the FTC on Google, matthias, 11:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 11:35
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:25
- Re: Weak contiuity of an operator, Ronald Bruck, 11:25
- Re: Example of a Vector Space which cannot be made into an inner product space, Arturo Magidin, 11:07
- image v. range, Gary Weselle, 11:01
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, Chip Eastham, 11:01
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, Toni Lassila, 10:55
- Re: Simple, write to the FTC on Google, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 10:34
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:34
- Re: Topologically what is a torus in 2-d; difference between torus and sphe, Martin Wanvik, 10:32
- Re: Hofstadter Move?, Matt Noonan, 10:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 10:06
- notation of mapping, Gary Weselle, 09:49
- How to generate a random irreducible polynomial in GF[2], zig . wei, 09:46
- Re: Some more novel dice questions, G.E. Ivey, 09:43
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Jonathan Hoyle, 09:42
- Re: group action, Arturo Magidin, 09:40
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, Arturo Magidin, 09:38
- Re: basic question about metric space... is a distance metric continuous function?, José Carlos Santos, 09:33
- Re: basic question about metric space... is a distance metric continuous function?, hanebaly, 09:29
- Re: group action, José Carlos Santos, 09:29
- Re: Two algebraic inequalies....., alexandru . lupas, 09:09
- Re: Bounded Rearragement, David C . Ullrich, 09:08
- Re: Interpolation for rational functions, Raymond Manzoni, 09:05
- Re: When is V* not isomorphic to V?, David C . Ullrich, 08:41
- Re: When is V* not isomorphic to V?, Lee Rudolph, 08:40
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, David C . Ullrich, 08:31
- Initial form in a graded ring, vvvsan, 08:30
- Re: When is V* not isomorphic to V?, G.E. Ivey, 08:28
- Re: Example of a Vector Space which cannot be made into an inner product space, Lee Rudolph, 08:23
- Re: Example of a Vector Space which cannot be made into an inner product space, David C . Ullrich, 08:17
- Re: Example of a Vector Space which cannot be made into an inner product space, David C . Ullrich, 08:14
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, albstorz, 08:10
- Re: Eqation of line, incon, 07:58
- Re: Uniform convergence of series of sums..., David C . Ullrich, 07:50
- Re: inverse of f(x) = e^x + x + 3, G. A. Edgar, 07:48
- Re: Does fn(x)=x^n uniformly convergent on [0, a] for a<1?, David C . Ullrich, 07:42
- Re: Riemann integral?, David C . Ullrich, 07:35
- Re: When is V* not isomorphic to V?, David C . Ullrich, 07:32
- Re: Hofstadter Move?, Mastercp, 07:03
- Bounded Rearragement, Albert, 06:54
- Re: Laplace Inverse of s/(s+a), Stephen, 06:22
- Re: bound on eigenvalues..., alexandru . lupas, 06:13
- Re: Two algebraic inequalies....., Valeriu Anisiu, 05:55
- group action, eugene, 05:54
- Re: Uniqueness in 2005 Putnam A1, Woeginger Gerhard, 05:51
- differential calculus, Javier Minguez, 05:33
- differential calculus, Javier Minguez, 05:33
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Matt Gutting, 05:21
- Re: bound on eigenvalues..., Robert Low, 04:53
- Re: basic question about metric space... is a distance metric continuous function?, José Carlos Santos, 04:48
- Re: bound on eigenvalues..., José Carlos Santos, 04:47
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, William Elliot, 04:20
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, mskirvin, 04:19
- Re: basic question about metric space... is a distance metric continuous function?, William Elliot, 04:13
- Re: Complex analysis question, pauldepstein, 03:49
- Re: There are NO integral solutions to u^k+v^k = y^k+z^k for k = 6, john_ramsden, 03:41
- Re: baye's Theorem: can normals and binary random vars get along?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 03:29
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, albstorz, 03:25
- Re: Axiomatic Set Theory and the Uniqueness of the Natural Numbers, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 03:22
- Re: Wilson's theorem, denis feldmann, 03:17
- Re: How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, Robert Low, 03:11
- Re: baye's Theorem: can normals and binary random vars get along?, Rob Johnson, 03:09
- bound on eigenvalues..., comtech, 03:08
- Re: Topologically what is a torus in 2-d; difference between torus and sphe, a_plutonium, 03:06
- Wilson's theorem, carel, 03:04
- basic question about metric space... is a distance metric continuous function?, comtech, 03:04
- How do you define a polynomial? What is the official definition of a polynomial?, comtech, 03:01
- Re: Proof of the Poincare Conjecture; my 1990's proof revised, a_plutonium, 02:57
- There are NO integral solutions to u^k+v^k = y^k+z^k for k = 6, titus_piezas, 02:32
- Re: integral does not exist vs. Riemann unintegrable?, Robert Israel, 02:13
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:12
- Re: FERMAT LAST THEOREM, quasi, 02:00
- Re: Complex analysis question, Jules, 01:52
- Re: Complex analysis question, Jules, 01:51
- Re: Eqation of line, Dave, 01:47
- Re: baye's Theorem: can normals and binary random vars get along?, Robert Israel, 01:46
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:36
- Re: Nested Sums of Reciprocals and Harmonic Numbers, LC Killingbeck, 01:31
- FERMAT LAST THEOREM, byafet, 01:16
- Two algebraic inequalies....., Alex. Lupas, 01:13
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, Proginoskes, 01:07
- Re: computing geodesics, geodesic distance algorithms, Robert Israel, 00:41
December 05, 2005
- Re: Compact connected Hausdorff, quasi, 23:53
- Re: Collatz primes of the form -- (2^n*10-1)/3, Dan, 23:50
- Re: nonabelian group, Arturo Magidin, 23:34
- integral does not exist vs. Riemann unintegrable?, comtech, 23:34
- baye's Theorem: can normals and binary random vars get along?, Kenneth Onyee, 23:28
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, Robert Israel, 23:27
- Re: Eqation of line, fishfry, 23:22
- Re: set builder notation, William Elliot, 23:17
- Eqation of line, incon, 23:03
- The best quiz and trivia site., info, 23:01
- Re: grav problem, William Elliot, 23:01
- Re: nonabelian group, jade1378, 23:00
- Re: Good DE book, Conrad Creel, 22:31
- Re: ineqality, matthew_folz, 22:18
- Re: image v. range, MoeBlee, 22:16
- Re: collatz proof algorithm reveals e, ronaldo, 22:16
- Re: Good DE book, Rouben Rostamian, 22:14
- Good DE book, Patrick, 22:08
- Re: Axiomatic Set Theory and the Uniqueness of the Natural Numbers, matthias, 22:07
- Re: Collatz primes of the form -- (2^n*10-1)/3, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:59
- Re: Simple, write to the FTC on Google, Dave L. Renfro, 21:50
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 21:32
- Re: cyclic, Bill Dubuque, 21:18
- Re: Collatz primes of the form -- (2^n*10-1)/3*** correction ***, Dan, 21:16
- Re: area in hyperbolic plane, TCL, 21:07
- Re: Simple, write to the FTC on Google, woo, 20:54
- Re: symmetric polynomials, Thomas Mautsch, 20:49
- Re: Simple, write to the FTC on Google, woo, 20:40
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 20:37
- Collatz primes of the form -- (2^n*10-1)/3, Dan, 20:37
- Re: computing geodesics, geodesic distance algorithms, Thomas Mautsch, 20:36
- Re: Simple, write to the FTC on Google, woo, 20:30
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, David R Tribble, 20:25
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 20:21
- Re: subfield of rational numbers, Bill Dubuque, 20:07
- Re: cyclic, Arturo Magidin, 20:01
- Re: ineqality, Thomas Mautsch, 20:01
- Re: Simple, write to the FTC on Google, Joseph Fagan, 19:46
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 19:43
- Simple, write to the FTC on Google, woo, 19:34
- Initial form in a graded ring, vvvsan, 19:32
- Re: image v. range, Peter Allen, 19:31
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Nam Nguyen, 19:25
- Re: Putnam 2005, Thomas Mautsch, 19:24
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 19:23
- Re: Properties of a certain algebra, Peter L. Montgomery, 19:22
- Re: Properties of a certain algebra, Peter L. Montgomery, 19:10
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, Nathan, 19:08
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, dbeckman, 18:56
- Re: image v. range, wwromeo, 18:52
- Re: Algebriac Inequality ( Schur-type ), Thomas Mautsch, 18:46
- Re: Properties of a certain algebra, James Dolan, 18:41
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 18:29
- Re: nonabelian group, ememy, 18:25
- Re: how to prove this property of supremum?, comtech, 18:22
- Re: cyclic, lataianu bogdan, 18:22
- Re: how to prove this property of supremum?, comtech, 18:22
- Re: cyclic, mskirvin, 18:21
- Re: image v. range, Peter Allen, 18:07
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., lataianu bogdan, 18:05
- grav problem, Paul, 18:01
- Re: Best order from a weighted directed graph, Bob, 17:57
- Re: Question on Mersenne Prime Stats, Gottfried Helms, 17:56
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 17:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 17:51
- Re: cyclic, Hans, 17:46
- Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha..., Dement, 17:44
- Re: Question on Mersenne Prime Stats, Gottfried Helms, 17:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Chris Menzel, 17:41
- Re: image v. range, John H Palmieri, 17:41
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Nam Nguyen, 17:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:35
- Re: Laplace Inverse of s/(s+a), Anon, 17:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:14
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:12
- cyclic, jade1378, 17:05
- Re: Question on Mersenne Prime Stats, stush, 17:01
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 17:01
- Re: image v. range, Dave Rusin, 16:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:59
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:56
- Re: Logic Proofs, Mr . X, 16:55
- Re: inverse of f(x) = e^x + x + 3, Ioannis, 16:54
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:53
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 16:49
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, Gerry Myerson, 16:49
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, William Hughes, 16:48
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:48
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 16:46
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 16:44
- inverse of f(x) = e^x + x + 3, wwromeo, 16:42
- Re: Laplace Inverse of s/(s+a), Robert Israel, 16:30
- Re: Axiomatic Set Theory and the Uniqueness of the Natural Numbers, MoeBlee, 16:29
- Re: image v. range, Jeff, 16:29
- Re: image v. range, Robert Israel, 16:27
- Laplace Inverse of s/(s+a), daniel . seliskar, 16:26
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 16:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:17
- area in hyperbolic plane, TCL, 16:15
- Re: how to prove this property of supremum?, NotP, 16:10
- Re: Uniqueness in 2005 Putnam A1, Robert Israel, 16:10
- Software for multivariate solution counting?, David Sevilla, 16:08
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:04
- Re: Does fn(x)=x^n uniformly convergent on [0, a] for a<1?, NotP, 16:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 16:03
- Re: Complex analysis question, The World Wide Wade, 15:56
- Re: Question on Mersenne Prime Stats, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:51
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:48
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:48
- Re: Axiomatic Set Theory and the Uniqueness of the Natural Numbers, Pawel Gladki, 15:40
- Re: some kind of uniqueness of vector fields?, Thomas Mautsch, 15:39
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:38
- Re: FLT case 1, Roman B. Binder, 15:37
- Re: Weak contiuity of an operator, Pawel Kliber, 15:36
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:35
- Re: set builder notation, Adam Burley, 15:29
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:27
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:25
- ? decomposing B matrix in A matrix's e-vectors, Cheng Cosine, 15:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:23
- Re: Example of a Vector Space which cannot be made into an inner product space, Arturo Magidin, 15:21
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:17
- Re: equilateral tringles, Dave Rusin, 15:17
- Re: vector analysis, Adam Burley, 15:17
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:16
- Re: When is V* not isomorphic to V?, Robert Israel, 15:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:12
- Re: how to prove this property of supremum?, Arturo Magidin, 15:11
- Re: vector analysis, Robert Low, 15:04
- Re: Question on Mersenne Prime Stats, Gottfried Helms, 15:03
- Re: Riemann integral?, The World Wide Wade, 15:02
- Re: Example of a Vector Space which cannot be made into an inner product space, Jules, 15:02
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 15:02
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 15:01
- Axiomatic Set Theory and the Uniqueness of the Natural Numbers, Adam Burley, 15:01
- Re: notation of mapping, Robert Low, 15:01
- Re: Example of a Vector Space which cannot be made into an inner product space, G. A. Edgar, 14:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 14:58
- Re: Complex analysis question, Abdulla, 14:58
- Uniqueness in 2005 Putnam A1, Peter L. Montgomery, 14:58
- Complex analysis question, Abdulla, 14:57
- vector analysis, Robert, 14:56
- Re: Uniform convergence of series of sums..., Robert Israel, 14:54
- Re: how to prove this property of supremum?, comtech, 14:53
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:48
- Re: What's wrong with the topologist's sine curve?, W. Dale Hall, 14:48
- Re: help with finding m/n = 0.6746988, please, Keith A. Lewis, 14:44
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:40
- Re: Example of a Vector Space which cannot be made into an inner product space, Lee Rudolph, 14:37
- Re: Example of a Vector Space which cannot be made into an inner product space, G. A. Edgar, 14:35
- Re: Question on Mersenne Prime Stats, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:29
- Re: Properties of a certain algebra, Marc Olschok, 14:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:28
- Re: Conditional expectation vs infinite expectation, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:25
- Re: Looman-Menchoff theorem, Julien Santini, 14:23
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Virgil, 14:17
- Re: how to prove this property of supremum?, comtech, 14:16
- Re: how to prove this property of supremum?, comtech, 14:16
- Re: basic question about set and functions..., Marc Olschok, 14:10
- Re: Logic Proofs, Mikey, 14:09
- Re: measure, The World Wide Wade, 14:08
- Re: Does fn(x)=x^n uniformly convergent on [0, a] for a<1?, comtech, 14:07
- Re: Uniform convergence of series of sums..., comtech, 14:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Ross A. Finlayson, 13:57
- Re: Putnam 2005 -- some answers [SPOILER ALERT], Rob Johnson, 13:53
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 13:50
- extensions of Bezout's theorem to non-integer powers?, c.rowat@xxxxxxxxxx, 13:35
- Re: Question on Mersenne Prime Stats, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:20
- Re: computing geodesics, geodesic distance algorithms, Robert Israel, 13:12
- Re: Properties of a certain algebra, John Coleman, 13:03
- Re: Algebriac Inequality ( Schur-type ), quasi, 12:54
- Re: percentile question, Robert May, 12:52
- Re: Looman-Menchoff theorem, Dave L. Renfro, 12:52
- Re: Properties of a certain algebra, John Coleman, 12:51
- Re: equidistant sets, Keith A. Lewis, 12:46
- Re: Example of a Vector Space which cannot be made into an inner product space, Dave Rusin, 12:44
- Re: David Rusin : Prime ideals and Maximal ideals question, Dave Rusin, 12:41
- Looman-Menchoff theorem, Julien Santini, 12:37
- Re: Properties of a certain algebra, mateus.oliveira, 12:33
- "Math gains add up", yared22311, 12:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 12:23
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 12:20
- GOOD LUCK..., blue.formula : blue.kids, 12:19
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 12:17
- Re: Putnam 2005 -- some answers [SPOILER ALERT], Igor Khavkine, 12:10
- Re: subfield of rational numbers, Dave Rusin, 12:09
- Re: continuous and measurable, Jiri Lebl, 12:06
- Re: Putnam 2005, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 12:04
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 11:57
- Example of a Vector Space which cannot be made into an inner product space, A K L, 11:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 11:53
- Re: Algebriac Inequality ( Schur-type ), Dave Rusin, 11:51
- Re: question on deceleration due to friction., Randy Poe, 11:46
- Re: Conditional expectation vs infinite expectation, Herman Rubin, 11:43
- set builder notation, Luke Wu, 11:42
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:42
- Re: Proof of tan 1 > root 2, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro, 11:41
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:36
- Proof of tan 1 > root 2, agentmath, 11:34
- Re: Putnam 2005 -- some answers [SPOILER ALERT], Dave L. Renfro, 11:30
- Re: absolute convergence vs. convergence, Jiri Lebl, 11:28
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 11:25
- Re: continuous and measurable, Herman Rubin, 11:24
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 11:22
- Re: Request help, Arturo Magidin, 11:18
- Re: Properties of a certain algebra, William Elliot, 11:16
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 11:06
- Re: Putnam 2005 -- some answers [SPOILER ALERT], G. A. Edgar, 11:04
- Re: Request help, Bobbine, 11:02
- Re: Properties of a certain algebra, John Coleman, 10:58
- Re: nonabelian group, Arturo Magidin, 10:57
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Daryl McCullough, 10:56
- Re: Properties of a certain algebra, William Elliot, 10:55
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:51
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Randy Poe, 10:50
- Re: Logic Proofs, Mr X ., 10:43
- Re: integral problem, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 10:41
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, albstorz, 10:39
- nonabelian group, Bobbine, 10:38
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 10:30
- David Rusin : Prime ideals and Maximal ideals question, James, 10:19
- Re: Prime ideals, k[x,y], James, 10:16
- question on deceleration due to friction., edz, 10:16
- Properties of a certain algebra, mateus.oliveira, 10:13
- Re: Logic Proofs, G . Frege, 10:11
- Re: Best order from a weighted directed graph, William Hughes, 10:11
- Re: absolute convergence vs. convergence, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 10:07
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Robert Low, 10:06
- Re: Question on Mersenne Prime Stats, Dan, 10:02
- Re: subfield of rational numbers, dwwdkddb, 09:58
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals, Tony Orlow, 09:56
- Best order from a weighted directed graph, Bob, 09:46
- Re: Putnam 2005, G. A. Edgar, 09:42
- Re: Weak contiuity of an operator, David C . Ullrich, 09:42
- Re: Question on Mersenne Prime Stats, Gottfried Helms, 09:37
- Re: Uniform convergence of series of sums..., David C . Ullrich, 09:24
- Re: very basic logic questions, briggs, 09:23
- Re: Does fn(x)=x^n uniformly convergent on [0, a] for a<1?, Robert Low, 09:22
- Re: Does fn(x)=x^n uniformly convergent on [0, a] for a<1?, David C . Ullrich, 09:22
- Re: some kind of uniqueness of vector fields?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:22
- Re: Uniform convergence vs. pointwise convergence?, David C . Ullrich, 09:18
- Re: Uniform convergence of series of sums..., A N Niel, 09:09
- Re: When is V* not isomorphic to V?, G. A. Edgar, 09:05
- Re: subfield of rational numbers, A N Niel, 09:01
- Re: What's the difference between Riemann integrability and Existence of antiderivative?, David C . Ullrich, 09:01
- Re: Algebriac Inequality ( Schur-type ), alexandru . lupas, 09:00
- Re: radon-nikodym, David C . Ullrich, 08:51
- Re: Proof of the Poincare Conjecture; my 1990's proof revised, Dik T. Winter, 08:51
- Re: What's wrong with the topologist's sine curve?, Arturo Magidin, 08:48
- Re: What's wrong with the topologist's sine curve?, David C . Ullrich, 08:47
- Re: Riemann integral?, David C . Ullrich, 08:45
- Re: Riemann integral?, David C . Ullrich, 08:43
- Re: [Suduko] Hofstadter Move?, jmfbahciv, 08:42
- Re: how to prove this property of supremum?, Arturo Magidin, 08:35
- Re: the math defintion of continuity is very unintuitive..., David C . Ullrich, 08:33
- Re: basic question about set and functions..., Arturo Magidin, 08:33
- [Suduko] Hofstadter Move?, Hauke Reddmann, 08:28
- game with stochastic subgradient strategy updates, stan, 08:26
- Re: absolute convergence vs. convergence, David C . Ullrich, 08:20
- Weak contiuity of an operator, Pawel Kliber, 08:13
- Re: When is V* not isomorphic to V?, David C . Ullrich, 08:13
- Re: FLT case 1, Pubkeybreaker, 08:07
- Re: FLT case 1, Pubkeybreaker, 08:05
- Re: When is V* not isomorphic to V?, David C . Ullrich, 08:03
- Re: Jordan Curve Theorem, Timothy Murphy, 07:44
- Re: When is V* not isomorphic to V?, quasi, 07:30
- Re: Complex variable, Jose Antonio, 07:01
- subfield of rational numbers, dwwdkddb, 07:01
- Re: question on set operations..., William Elliot, 06:55
- Complex variable, Elena Rojo, 06:51
- Re: Galois theory, Rupert, 06:40
- Re: Compact connected Hausdorff, William Elliot, 06:40
- Re: differential calculus, Jose Antonio, 06:28
- Galois theory, Jose Antonio, 06:27
- Re: Compact connected Hausdorff, William Elliot, 06:19
- differential calculus, javier minguez, 06:08
- Re: When is V* not isomorphic to V?, Robert Low, 05:51
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 05:43
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 05, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:40
- Re: Conditional expectation vs infinite expectation, Jannick Asmus, 05:34
- Re: Topologically what is a torus in 2-d; difference between torus and sphe, Martin Wanvik, 05:25
- Re: Logic Proofs, Pinyan, 05:23
- Re: continuous and measurable, matthew_folz, 05:23
- Re: Jordan Curve Theorem, smn, 04:32
- Re: Uniform convergence vs. pointwise convergence?, Thomas Madden, 04:26
- Re: basic question about set and functions..., William Elliot, 04:19
- Re: basic Mandelbrot question, williamhbrockltd, 04:18
- Re: Compact connected Hausdorff, smn, 04:15
- Conditional expectation vs infinite expectation, LordBeotian, 04:13
- Re: Logic Proofs, Torkel Franzen, 04:05
- Logic Proofs, Mikey, 03:50
- Re: absolute convergence vs. convergence, Mike Kent, 03:35
- Re: how to prove this property of supremum?, ConradCreel, 03:32
- Uniform convergence of series of sums..., comtech, 03:18
- Does fn(x)=x^n uniformly convergent on [0, a] for a<1?, comtech, 03:15
- Uniform convergence vs. pointwise convergence?, comtech, 03:11
- What's the difference between Riemann integrability and Existence of antiderivative?, comtech, 03:06
- how to prove this property of supremum?, comtech, 03:04
- basic question about set and functions..., comtech, 02:59
- Re: continuous and measurable, Bobbine, 02:58
- Re: Compact connected Hausdorff, Jannick Asmus, 02:55
- Re: Request help, jade1378, 02:52
- Jordan Curve Theorem, jpawloski, 02:27
- Re: Question on Mersenne Prime Stats, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:44
- Cross Ratio depends upon Rotation of a Pencil of Rays, Narasimham, 01:42
- radon-nikodym, diana2005, 01:39
- Cross Ratio is rotation of a pencil of rays, Narasimham, 01:18
- Re: very basic logic questions, Torkel Franzen, 01:17
- Re: Putnam 2005, Phil Carmody, 01:10
- Re: appendix, Latex (help), Proginoskes, 00:56
- Re: Putnam 2005, Proginoskes, 00:53
- Re: TRIG HELP, Virgil, 00:35
- Re: separation of vars PDE, Robert Israel, 00:33
- Re: TRIG HELP, Virgil, 00:30
- Re: very basic logic questions, Proginoskes, 00:23
- Topologically what is a torus in 2-d; difference between torus and sphere with a puncture hole, a_plutonium, 00:18
- Re: ambiguities, Proginoskes, 00:14
- Re: Proof of the Poincare Conjecture; my 1990's proof revised, a_plutonium, 00:08
- Re: Request help, mskirvin, 00:07
- Re: Dimensional consistency: f=ma, Marian Minar, 00:01
December 04, 2005
- Request help, jade1378, 23:46
- Re: How to set up a diff equation for circuit with a diode (Mathematica related)?, Doperfest, 23:35
- TRIG HELP, ashmangat@xxxxxxxxx, 23:29
- TRIG HELP, ashmangat@xxxxxxxxx, 23:28
- separation of vars PDE, vsgdp, 23:16
- Re: Question on Mersenne Prime Stats, Dan, 23:08
- Re: Algebriac Inequality ( Schur-type ), TCL, 22:43
- Re: Riemann integral?, Dave Rusin, 22:38
- Re: Proof of the Poincare Conjecture; my 1990's proof revised, Dik T. Winter, 22:34
- Re: Algebriac Inequality ( Schur-type ), quasi, 22:27
- Re: how are all the different types of mathematics related?, deniz . bahar, 22:17
- Re: how are all the different types of mathematics related?, deniz . bahar, 22:17
- Re: unique critical points, quasi, 22:15
- Re: Putnam 2005 -- some answers [SPOILER ALERT], abhishekasthana, 22:15
- Re: appendix, Latex (help), don, 22:05
- basic Mandelbrot question, williamhbrockltd, 22:04
- Re: Algebriac Inequality ( Schur-type ), Dave Rusin, 21:57
- Re: M-set is halluncinatory (was, Re: basic Mandelbrot question), williamhbrockltd, 21:56
- Re: frobenius norm, Duncan, please help, SportsNut, 21:53