sci.math (date)
September 26, 2005
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 06:01
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 05:41
- Re: modern math is failure -- back to the drawing board, finance hotshot, 05:09
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, finance hotshot, 05:06
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, finance hotshot, 05:06
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Han de Bruijn, 04:13
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Han de Bruijn, 04:04
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Han de Bruijn, 03:58
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Han de Bruijn, 03:43
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 03:11
- Re: modern math is failure -- back to the drawing board, Virgil, 02:44
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:55
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:37
- Re: modern math is failure -- back to the drawing board, finance hotshot, 01:15
September 25, 2005
- Re: modern math is failure -- back to the drawing board, Herman Rubin, 21:15
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Abe Kohen, 21:04
- Re: modern math is failure -- back to the drawing board, mzafrullah, 16:30
- Re: modern math is failure -- back to the drawing board, Mathematics Lover, 16:15
- modern math is failure -- back to the drawing board, finance hotshot, 16:03
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, finance hotshot, 02:06
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Mason A . Clark, 01:48
September 24, 2005
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:52
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:47
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:39
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:24
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, finance hotshot, 22:02
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, finance hotshot, 22:01
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, finance hotshot, 21:58
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, finance hotshot, 21:56
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 21:00
- Re: revisiting my old alleged proof of Infinitude of Perfect Numbers, a_plutonium, 20:16
- Re: revisiting my old alleged proof of Infinitude of Perfect Numbers, Dik T. Winter, 20:16
- Re: A Simple Functional Equation, Lee Rudolph, 20:08
- A collection of elementary math journals, Dave L. Renfro, 20:05
- Re: Help differentiating, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 20:05
- Re: Help differentiating, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 20:00
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection ellipse, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 19:52
- Re: Help differentiating, Jim Spriggs, 19:51
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Dik T. Winter, 19:49
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Dik T. Winter, 19:46
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection ellipse, AVK, 19:26
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 19:22
- Help differentiating, inf, 19:03
- Re: elements of odd order, William Elliot, 19:03
- Cylinder plane intersection ellipse, AVK, 18:58
- Re: induction, Jim Spriggs, 18:32
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Timothy Little, 18:31
- Cylinder plane intersection, AVK, 18:24
- Re: operations between different numbers, Timothy Little, 18:23
- Re: Area of X^2*n+Y^2*n=a^2*n, M.A.Fajjal, 18:10
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Timothy Little, 18:07
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 18:06
- Re: induction, Jim Spriggs, 17:55
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Timothy Little, 17:53
- Re: Strange problem about double points (difficult?), computer, 17:53
- Re: Congruece Problem, george ghiata, 17:51
- Re: Complex conjugate of an integral, José Carlos Santos, 17:49
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, AVK, 17:48
- Total Number Spaces of Reals follow Benford and Zipf, galien8, 17:46
- Re: Linguistic ambiguity vs. mathematical precision, A N Niel, 17:46
- Re: new easy question about supremmum, A N Niel, 17:44
- Re: Strange problem about double points (difficult?), Lee Rudolph, 17:44
- Congruece Problem, george ghiata, 17:43
- Re: A Simple Functional Equation, A N Niel, 17:41
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:35
- Re: easy question about supremum, Timothy Little, 17:35
- Strange problem about double points (difficult?), computer, 17:33
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Timothy Little, 17:30
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), Timothy Little, 17:22
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Mason A . Clark, 17:17
- Re: Curvature of an object: was Re: Smashing a sphere, Robert Low, 17:16
- Re: how can I porve that n(n^2-1) is divisble by 6 fro all natrual numbers, quasi, 17:07
- Re: induction, The World Wide Wade, 17:06
- Re: Complex conjugate of an integral, Jannick Asmus, 16:42
- Re: Complex conjugate of an integral, Zinc Potterman, 16:29
- Re: elements of odd order, Arturo Magidin, 16:28
- Re: Invariant polynomials, Nicola Sottocornola, 16:27
- Re: Curvature of an object: was Re: Smashing a sphere, Keith A. Lewis, 16:15
- Re: elements of odd order, mzafrullah, 16:12
- Re: Area of X^2*n+Y^2*n=a^2*n, matt271829-news, 16:07
- Re: basic algebraic geometry question, David Bernier, 16:05
- Re: revisiting my old alleged proof of Infinitude of Perfect Numbers, a_plutonium, 16:03
- Re: induction, Jannick Asmus, 16:00
- Re: A Simple Functional Equation, The World Wide Wade, 15:51
- Area of X^2*n+Y^2*n=a^2*n, M.A.Fajjal, 15:48
- Re: revisiting my old alleged proof of Infinitude of Perfect Numbers, a_plutonium, 15:47
- Re: basic algebraic geometry question, Jannick Asmus, 15:46
- induction, ohi, 15:40
- basic algebraic geometry question, David Bernier, 15:40
- Re: new easy question about supremmum, Darko Aleksic, 15:39
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 15:30
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 15:23
- Re: f(x+y)=f(x).f(y) ==> f(x)=C.exp(x), Ronald Bloom, 15:21
- Re: What does "Infinity" really mean?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:18
- Re: revisiting my old alleged proof of Infinitude of Perfect Numbers, a_plutonium, 15:14
- Re: elements of odd order, Arturo Magidin, 15:05
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:57
- Re: Complex conjugate of an integral, Jannick Asmus, 14:29
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, jennifer, 14:28
- Re: new easy question about supremmum, José Carlos Santos, 14:27
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:25
- Re: Complex conjugate of an integral, José Carlos Santos, 14:24
- Re: easy question about supremum, José Carlos Santos, 14:22
- Complex conjugate of an integral, Zinc Potterman, 14:10
- Re: Invariant polynomials, Axel Vogt, 13:51
- Linguistic ambiguity vs. mathematical precision, Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim, 13:40
- Linguistic ambiguity vcs. mathematical precision, Dr. Jamshid Ibrahim, 13:37
- Re: easy question about supremum, anonymous, 13:33
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 13:24
- Re: A Simple Functional Equation, Maury Barbato, 13:19
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx, 13:18
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Allan Adler, 13:18
- revisiting my old alleged proof of Infinitude of Perfect Numbers, a_plutonium, 13:14
- Re: A higher math education, Allan Adler, 13:12
- Re: easy question about supremum, Robert Low, 13:00
- Re: What does "Infinity" really mean?, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: What does "Infinity" really mean?, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: new easy question about supremmum, Jannick Asmus, 12:55
- new easy question about supremmum, Jonas, 12:50
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 12:47
- Re: easy question about supremum, José Carlos Santos, 12:46
- Re: Unorthodox(?) mathematical theory of voting, Keith Ramsay, 12:42
- Re: Linear algebra question (surprisingly elusive), Trav, 12:38
- Re: easy question about supremum, Mathematics Lover, 12:35
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Mathematics Lover, 12:34
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 12:34
- Re: easy question about supremum, Jonas, 12:32
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Mathematics Lover, 12:30
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 12:27
- Re: Is math a real science?, Damir, 12:26
- Re: Linear algebra question (surprisingly elusive), Valeriu Anisiu, 12:25
- Re: Time vs. Distance Graphs, fattails, 12:22
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 12:19
- Re: Proof that 1 is the only Odd Perfect Number and thus the oldest math conjecture is conquered, a_plutonium, 12:13
- history of recursion/induction, Helmut Richter, 12:11
- Re: easy question about supremum, NotP, 12:04
- easy question about supremum, Jonas, 12:00
- Proof that 1 is the only Odd Perfect Number and thus the oldest math conjecture is conquered, a_plutonium, 11:59
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Keith Ramsay, 11:59
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Dik T. Winter, 11:56
- Re: how can I porve that n(n^2-1) is divisble by 6 fro all natrual numbers, Phil Freedenberg, 11:50
- Re: Linear algebra question (surprisingly elusive), NotP, 11:46
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Androcles, 11:37
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Androcles, 11:36
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Jesse F. Hughes, 11:35
- Re: how can I porve that n(n^2-1) is divisble by 6 fro all natrual numbers, Phil Carmody, 11:30
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 11:15
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, mzafrullah, 11:03
- THE GENERAL RELATIVITY ERROR, ACE, 11:01
- Re: elements of odd order, mzafrullah, 11:01
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 10:50
- how can I porve that n(n^2-1) is divisble by 6 fro all natrual numbers, jeffa, 10:45
- Re: Invariant polynomials, David C . Ullrich, 10:42
- Re: Invariant polynomials, Nicola Sottocornola, 10:39
- Re: What does "Infinity" really mean?, Dan Christensen, 10:36
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Narasimham, 10:35
- Re: infinity, Robert Low, 10:18
- Re: A higher math education, pfntjux, 10:09
- Re: f(x+y)=f(x).f(y) ==> f(x)=C.exp(x), Arturo Magidin, 10:08
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Robert J. Kolker, 10:08
- Re: operations between different numbers, Robert Low, 10:07
- Re: operations between different numbers, Robert Low, 10:04
- Re: A Simple Functional Equation, Lee Rudolph, 09:59
- Re: operations between different numbers, Jim Spriggs, 09:45
- fractal used in tv show, Roger Bagula, 09:35
- Re: operations between different numbers, sizors_1, 09:32
- Re: Odd thing about a^4+b^4+c^4+d^4+e^4=f^4, titus_piezas, 09:28
- Re: A Simple Functional Equation, José Carlos Santos, 09:18
- Re: Linear algebra question (surprisingly elusive), quasi, 08:46
- Re: f(x+y)=f(x).f(y) ==> f(x)=C.exp(x), A N Niel, 08:42
- Re: Lipchitz condition, A N Niel, 08:27
- Re: f(x+y)=f(x).f(y) ==> f(x)=C.exp(x), Ron Sperber, 08:22
- Re: A higher math education, Lee Rudolph, 08:00
- Re: A Simple Functional Equation, Maury Barbato, 07:54
- Lipchitz condition, chenitz, 07:54
- Re: " Wanted a solution to 1/f(f(x)) = 1/f(x) +1/x , x > 0 ", A N Niel, 07:52
- Re: operations between different numbers, A N Niel, 07:50
- Re: A Simple Functional Equation, G. A. Edgar, 07:47
- Re: A higher math education, G. A. Edgar, 07:37
- Re: Linear algebra question (surprisingly elusive), john_ramsden, 07:17
- Re: Odd thing about a^4+b^4+c^4+d^4+e^4=f^4, john_ramsden, 07:15
- Re: Invariant polynomials, Allan Adler, 07:10
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Richard Tobin, 06:48
- Re: Linear algebra question (surprisingly elusive), john_ramsden, 06:45
- Re: A Simple Functional Equation, Lee Rudolph, 06:00
- A Simple Functional Equation, Maury Barbato, 05:42
- Re: Linear algebra question (surprisingly elusive), Valeriu Anisiu, 05:32
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 05:10
- Re: Parity Eotvos experiments--a few facts, brian a m stuckless, 04:55
- Re: f(x+y)=f(x).f(y) ==> f(x)=C.exp(x), Mate, 04:12
- Re: Linear algebra question (surprisingly elusive), Jannick Asmus, 04:00
- Odd thing about a^4+b^4+c^4+d^4+e^4=f^4, titus_piezas, 03:56
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 03:39
- Re: elements of odd order, William Elliot, 03:28
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 03:19
- Linear algebra question (surprisingly elusive), Trav, 03:17
- Re: f(x+y)=f(x).f(y) ==> f(x)=C.exp(x), Arturo Magidin, 03:11
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 02:54
- f(x+y)=f(x).f(y) ==> f(x)=C.exp(x), Ronald Bloom, 02:54
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Robert Vienneau, 02:39
- Re: Rational vs irrational, mike, 02:33
- Re: number of closed circuits, jan hauben, 02:23
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 02:21
- Re: elements of odd order, Brian VanPelt, 02:05
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 01:55
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:52
- Re: elements of odd order, Brian VanPelt, 01:47
- Re: elements of odd order, William Elliot, 01:28
- Re: elements of odd order, William Elliot, 01:27
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:19
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), schoenfeld1, 01:17
- Re: operations between different numbers, Proginoskes, 01:00
- Re: Integration of x^n * Exp[-x^2], Anon, 00:59
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Ron Verrall, 00:55
- Re: Time vs. Distance Graphs, Proginoskes, 00:51
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:43
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Proginoskes, 00:41
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:39
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Proginoskes, 00:38
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:37
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 00:29
- Re: operations between different numbers, Jim Spriggs, 00:27
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Proginoskes, 00:13
September 23, 2005
- Re: Time vs. Distance Graphs, quasi, 23:58
- Re: Rational vs irrational, quasi, 23:48
- operations between different numbers, sizors_1, 23:41
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 23:40
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 23:37
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 23:34
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 23:14
- Re: " Wanted a solution to 1/f(f(x)) = 1/f(x) +1/x , x > 0 ", Jon Slaughter, 23:13
- Re: " Wanted a solution to 1/f(f(x)) = 1/f(x) +1/x , x > 0 ", Jon Slaughter, 23:02
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:58
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Russell, 22:48
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:43
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:42
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), Russell, 22:36
- Re: What does "Infinity" really mean?, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:23
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:23
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), The World Wide Wade, 22:12
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Dik T. Winter, 22:10
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Russell, 22:08
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:08
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:06
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:03
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, AVK, 22:02
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Russell, 22:00
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Dik T. Winter, 21:56
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Dik T. Winter, 21:48
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:43
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:43
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 21:40
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:36
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Androcles, 21:32
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:22
- Re: What does "Infinity" really mean?, Jim Spriggs, 21:17
- The Ultimate Online Pharmaceutical, Doctor, 21:17
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, AVK, 20:59
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Androcles, 20:55
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Androcles, 20:53
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, AVK, 20:51
- Re: Lie algebra homomorphism, Lie groups question,,, John M Lee, 20:49
- Re: What does "Infinity" really mean?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 20:34
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Timothy Little, 20:23
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Androcles, 20:21
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 20:02
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, AVK, 19:56
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Robert J. Kolker, 19:53
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Timothy Little, 19:43
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, AVK, 19:27
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, matt271829-news, 19:22
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:20
- Re: question about subspaces, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:18
- Re: Where is my error?, José Carlos Santos, 19:06
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, AVK, 19:01
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection (correction), Androcles, 19:01
- Re: Invariant polynomials, Robert Israel, 18:56
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Androcles, 18:49
- Re: Cylinder plane intersection, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 18:43
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), Minus XVII, 18:08
- Re: sets, David R Tribble, 18:07
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 18:02
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Androcles, 18:00
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:51
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:42
- Re: Classical ruin problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 17:36
- Re: sets, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 17:31
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:29
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, fernando revilla, 17:24
- Cylinder plane intersection, AVK, 17:23
- Re: Invariant polynomials, Nicola Sottocornola, 17:22
- Re: A higher math education, Jim Spriggs, 17:21
- Classical ruin problem, Jolly Good Fella, 17:18
- Re: binomial expansion, Russell, 17:17
- Re: Where is my error?, David W . Cantrell, 17:11
- Re: A higher math education, The World Wide Wade, 17:03
- Re: sets, Kees, 16:59
- Re: sets, Robert Low, 16:58
- Re: "the REVELATIONS of a CRANK" as a reply to WILES"proof of FLT, george ghiata, 16:56
- Re: sets, Arturo Magidin, 16:50
- Re: infinity, Robert Low, 16:49
- Re: sets, Arturo Magidin, 16:48
- Re: A higher math education, Jim Spriggs, 16:46
- Re: question about subspaces, Robert Low, 16:45
- Re: sets, Dave Seaman, 16:45
- Re: sets, Jason Pawloski, 16:43
- sets, ohi, 16:25
- Re: determining if point resides on a line segment, carlos, 16:23
- Re: A higher math education, Bart Goddard, 16:16
- Re: determining if point resides on a line segment, carlos, 16:15
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Androcles, 16:15
- Re: A higher math education, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:14
- Re: question about subspaces, woodland, 16:13
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:12
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 16:06
- Re: infinity, stephen, 16:05
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:03
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 15:58
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 15:53
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 15:51
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:46
- Re: A higher math education, Pubkeybreaker, 15:46
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:43
- Re: A higher math education, fishfry, 15:42
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 15:34
- A higher math education, pfntjux, 15:33
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 15:32
- Re: elements of odd order, mzafrullah, 15:32
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:30
- Re: Time vs. Distance Graphs, PD, 15:30
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 15:28
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:27
- Re: a simple question on algebra (left/right identities and left/right inverses)., porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:27
- Re: infinity, stephen, 15:26
- Re: determining if point resides on a line segment, matt271829-news, 15:26
- Re: infinity, Matt Gutting, 15:22
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:22
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:20
- Re: question about subspaces, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:16
- Re: Invariant polynomials, Robert Israel, 15:09
- question about subspaces, woodland, 15:09
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:08
- Re: infinity, Matt Gutting, 15:08
- Re: a simple question on algebra (left/right identities and left/right inverses)., porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:06
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 15:05
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:03
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 15:02
- Re: infinity, stephen, 15:00
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:57
- Re: infinity, Matt Gutting, 14:56
- elements of odd order, Carl R., 14:54
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 14:54
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Androcles, 14:50
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:43
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:39
- Re: differential equation, Robert Israel, 14:38
- Re: dimension of intersection of subspaces., woodland, 14:35
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:33
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:32
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:24
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 14:23
- Re: binomial expansion, robison, 14:22
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 14:20
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, snapdragon31, 14:17
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 14:14
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:14
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 14:12
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 14:11
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:07
- Re: determining if point resides on a line segment, carlos, 14:06
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 14:02
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:01
- Re: Function discretization, Fla, 13:50
- Re: infinity, stephen, 13:49
- Re: infinity, Robert Low, 13:49
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 13:46
- Re: infinity, Matt Gutting, 13:46
- Re: Analogue of Noether's Theorem for finite groups?, Puppet_Sock, 13:43
- Re: infinity, Torkel Franzen, 13:41
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 13:39
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:39
- Re: Integration of x^n * Exp[-x^2], C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 13:36
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:33
- Re: infinity, Matt Gutting, 13:32
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:30
- Invariant polynomials, Nicola Sottocornola, 13:21
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 13:11
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 13:08
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, Narasimham, 13:01
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 12:58
- Re: a simple question on algebra (left/right identities and left/right inverses)., G. A. Edgar, 12:56
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 12:54
- Re: Rational vs irrational, A N Niel, 12:52
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 12:52
- Re: infinity, stephen, 12:46
- Re: measurable functions, mark12345, 12:41
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 12:35
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 12:19
- Re: Time vs. Distance Graphs, quasi, 12:18
- Re: measurable functions, John Coleman, 12:18
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, Narasimham, 12:14
- Re: Time vs. Distance Graphs, CWatters, 12:11
- Re: infinity, Robert Low, 12:10
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, fernando revilla, 12:09
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 12:05
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 12:04
- Re: infinity, Matt Gutting, 12:04
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 12:03
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 12:02
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 12:01
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 11:54
- Re: Function discretization [CORRECT], Peter Spellucci, 11:50
- Re: measurable functions, mark12345, 11:49
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 11:43
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 11:43
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 11:40
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, Narasimham, 11:35
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 11:35
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 11:21
- measurable functions, mark12345, 11:19
- Analogue of Noether's Theorem for finite groups?, Craig Feinstein, 11:18
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 11:07
- integral transformation and parametric curves, richard_lavoie, 11:01
- Re: Where is my error?, Dik T. Winter, 10:56
- Re: infinity, Matt Gutting, 10:53
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 10:53
- Re: Continuous Injections, Maury Barbato, 10:52
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:46
- Re: infinity, Torkel Franzen, 10:46
- Re: Rational vs irrational, briggs, 10:44
- Re: hard task, klawesyn28@xxxxxxxx, 10:44
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:43
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:38
- Re: dense set, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 10:38
- The Ultimate Online Pharmaceutical, Doctor, 10:32
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:27
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:25
- Re: Time vs. Distance Graphs, Mark Fergerson, 10:21
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 10:14
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:10
- Re: infinity, Torkel Franzen, 10:07
- Re: Where is my error?, Robert Low, 10:04
- Re: dimension of intersection of subspaces., Robert Low, 10:02
- Re: Modeling human height and other non-negative value phenomenons, Brablo, 09:54
- Re: dimension of intersection of subspaces., Hagen, 09:45
- Re: Where is my error?, pfntjux, 09:36
- Re: Where is my error?, pfntjux, 09:33
- Re: dimension of intersection of subspaces., woodland, 09:26
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 09:24
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 09:19
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 09:14
- Re: Time vs. Distance Graphs, Sam Wormley, 09:14
- Re: Time vs. Distance Graphs, José Carlos Santos, 09:01
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 08:48
- Re: MathWorld complaint, Chan-Ho Suh, 08:48
- number of closed circuits, Kea, 08:40
- Time vs. Distance Graphs, fattails, 08:27
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 08:20
- Re: Integration of x^n * Exp[-x^2], matt271829-news, 07:53
- Re: Serge Lang dead, sean . westmoreland, 07:52
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 07:51
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 07:42
- Re: infinity, Robert Low, 07:32
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 07:31
- Re: infinity, Matt Gutting, 07:16
- Re: Integration of x^n * Exp[-x^2], Esa A E Peuha, 07:13
- Re: help polylogarithm1, wissam, 07:12
- The Ultimate Online Pharmaceutical, Doctor, 07:03
- differential equation, wissam, 07:03
- Re: "the REVELATIONS of a CRANK" as a reply to WILES"proof of FLT, Michael Orion, 06:53
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, T.H. Ray, 06:49
- Re: dimension of intersection of subspaces., Robert Low, 06:37
- Re: Is math a real science?, T.H. Ray, 06:19
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Dik T. Winter, 06:09
- Re: dimension of intersection of subspaces., woodland, 06:06
- Re: " Wanted a solution to 1/f(f(x)) = 1/f(x) +1/x , x > 0 ", alainverghote, 06:01
- Re: proof of Infinitude Perfect Numbers and 1 is the only odd perfect number Re: Infinitude of Twin Primes and Goldbach use the same proof technique Re:, Proginoskes, 05:59
- Re: infinity, Russell, 05:51
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Han de Bruijn, 05:37
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 05:32
- Re: dimension of intersection of subspaces., Robert Low, 05:26
- Re: infinity, Lee Rudolph, 05:21
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Han de Bruijn, 05:18
- dimension of intersection of subspaces., woodland, 05:08
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Han de Bruijn, 05:08
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Proginoskes, 05:00
- Re: point-set topology, William Elliot, 04:57
- Re: mag5 stuff., William Elliot, 04:52
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Han de Bruijn, 04:52
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 04:48
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:28
- Re: Need help in probability calculations, William L. Bahn, 04:19
- Re: " Wanted a solution to 1/f(f(x)) = 1/f(x) +1/x , x > 0 ", Han de Bruijn, 04:10
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Proginoskes, 03:59
- Curvature of an object: was Re: Smashing a sphere, Robert Low, 03:58
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Proginoskes, 03:52
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Proginoskes, 03:52
- Function discretization [CORRECT], Fla, 03:45
- Integration of x^n * Exp[-x^2], Binesh Bannerjee, 03:21
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Proginoskes, 03:16
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Robert Vienneau, 03:15
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 03:10
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 03:02
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 03:02
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 02:52
- Function discretization, Fla, 02:50
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Proginoskes, 02:31
- Re: binomial expansion, Russell, 02:27
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 02:09
- Re: Adjoint representation question,,, Jannick Asmus, 02:06
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 01:47
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 01:47
- Re: The Pigeonhole Principle-1 pigeon 0 holes?, Russell, 01:00
- Re: infinity, Torkel Franzen, 00:52
- Lattice Basis Reduction, Stephen M. Fortescue, 00:38
September 22, 2005
- Re: density of primes in rings of algebraic integers, quasi, 23:49
- Re: Newbie question., Dave Seaman, 23:43
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 23:35
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 23:34
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 23:30
- Lattice Basis Reduction, Stephen M. Fortescue, 23:24
- Re: Newbie question., Jim Spriggs, 23:09
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 23:05
- Re: Newbie question., Zaien, 23:01
- Re: The Pigeonhole Principle-1 pigeon 0 holes?, Zaien, 22:53
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 22:52
- Re: Rational vs irrational, quasi, 22:41
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:37
- Re: Rational vs irrational, mike, 22:37
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 22:27
- Re: small but infinite sets, Dik T. Winter, 22:24
- Re: Help! Find the summation!, Paul Abbott, 22:20
- Re: small but infinite sets, Dik T. Winter, 22:12
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:11
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:10
- Re: point-set topology, quasi, 22:00
- Re: Need help in probability calculations, Gerry Myerson, 21:59
- Re: "the REVELATIONS of a CRANK" as a reply to WILES"proof of FLT, Gerry Myerson, 21:58
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Gerry Myerson, 21:56
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Virgil, 21:56
- Re: density of primes in rings of algebraic integers, Gerry Myerson, 21:54
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Proginoskes, 21:45
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Robert Israel, 21:45
- binomial expansion, robison, 21:34
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:28
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:22
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:10
- Re: Rational vs irrational, mike, 21:06
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:01
- Re: Intergrals in a physics problem., robison, 20:58
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:50
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:47
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:44
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:39
- Re: Rational vs irrational, quasi, 20:39
- Re: determining if point resides on a line segment, matt271829-news, 20:38
- Re: MathWorld complaint, Gerry Myerson, 20:33
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:32
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:31
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:29
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 20:24
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:23
- Re: a real identity problem (was: injective polynomial f: k x k -> k, Gerry Myerson, 20:22
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:20
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:16
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, Arturo Magidin, 20:15
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Dik T. Winter, 20:14
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, Gerry Myerson, 20:02
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Dave L. Renfro, 19:59
- Re: efficient solution to x^2 = k mod a^k-1, k odd prime, Gerry Myerson, 19:58
- Re: Simple Linear Algebra Question, quasi, 19:55
- Help! Find the summation!, lucy, 19:50
- Re: "the REVELATIONS of a CRANK" as a reply to WILES"proof of FLT, matt271829-news, 19:45
- Re: determining if point resides on a line segment, matt271829-news, 19:43
- Re: density of primes in rings of algebraic integers, Gerry Myerson, 19:42
- Free XBox360 (Guaranteed to ship before it is available in storesor $250 in cash), halo_doctor, 19:34
- Re: small but infinite sets, David R Tribble, 19:30
- Re: "the REVELATIONS of a CRANK" as a reply to WILES"proof of FLT, Gerry Myerson, 19:26
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Proginoskes, 19:23
- Re: small but infinite sets, Proginoskes, 19:21
- Re: small but infinite sets, Proginoskes, 19:20
- Re: Need help in probability calculations, Proginoskes, 19:15
- Re: small but infinite sets, Dave Seaman, 19:13
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:11
- Re: Need help in probability calculations, Gerry Myerson, 19:10
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:09
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Dave L. Renfro, 19:07
- Re: Greater-than-degree-5 equations, Ken Pledger, 19:00
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Robert Israel, 18:59
- Re: Simple Linear Algebra Question, quasi, 18:55
- Re: small but infinite sets, David R Tribble, 18:51
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:49
- point-set topology, Eric, 18:44
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:43
- Re: small but infinite sets, Ed Hook, 18:38
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 18:37
- Re: small but infinite sets, Proginoskes, 18:33
- Re: Tides for Mike, Michael Mcneil, 18:32
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 18:32
- Adjoint representation question,,, James, 18:32
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), The World Wide Wade, 18:32
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Proginoskes, 18:30
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:28
- Re: elementary grpah theory, Proginoskes, 18:24
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 18:18
- Re: Smashing a sphere, Keith A. Lewis, 18:02
- Re: determining if point resides on a line segment, Ed Hook, 18:02
- Re: determining if point resides on a line segment, matt271829-news, 18:01
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:53
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:52
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 17:44
- Re: Rational vs irrational, bigg . nate, 17:42
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 17:40
- Re: determining if point resides on a line segment, Randy Poe, 17:37
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 17:35
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 17:34
- Re: sin(n!), martin cohen, 17:33
- Re: dense set, Robert Low, 17:32
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 17:28
- determining if point resides on a line segment, leshanster, 17:26
- Re: infinity, stephen, 17:14
- Re: dense set, mark12345, 17:10
- Re: dense set, mathman, 17:10
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:08
- dense set, mark12345, 17:05
- Re: infinity, stephen, 17:04
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:57
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), Minus XVII, 16:50
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 16:48
- Re: "the REVELATIONS of a CRANK" as a reply to WILES"proof of FLT, Richard Schorn, 16:45
- Re: infinity, stephen, 16:45
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:44
- Need help in probability calculations, Alex_G, 16:43
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:39
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 16:29
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:29
- Re: "the REVELATIONS of a CRANK" as a reply to WILES"proof of FLT, Michael Orion, 16:27
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Virgil, 16:24
- Predict peak web site visits, l3xpert, 16:23
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:18
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:15
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 16:07
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:04
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:02
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:01
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:53
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, finance hotshot, 15:51
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 15:47
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 15:43
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:38
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:34
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 15:27
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 15:21
- Re: Intergrals in a physics problem., Dirk Van de moortel, 15:20
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 15:15
- Re: Continuous Injections, The World Wide Wade, 15:13
- Re: Algebraic closure of transcendental extensions and roots, quasi, 15:10
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:53
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, mmeron, 14:52
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:38
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:37
- Re: Triangle inside an ellipsoid, matt271829-news, 14:35
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:31
- Re: hard task, klawesyn28@xxxxxxxx, 14:23
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:20
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:11
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:08
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:06
- Re: infinity, Robert Low, 14:05
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:04
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 13:58
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 13:54
- Re: mag5 stuff., M.J.T. Guy, 13:43
- Re: Nonzero derivative, David C. Ullrich, 13:40
- "the REVELATIONS of a CRANK" as a reply to WILES"proof of FLT, george ghiata, 13:39
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:37
- Re: problem about measureble spaces, Jonas, 13:31
- Re: a simple question on algebra (left/right identities and left/right inverses)., Robert Israel, 13:30
- Re: small but infinite sets, M.J.T. Guy, 13:28
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 13:20
- Re: Adjoint of Integral operator., Robert Israel, 13:07
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 13:07
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:56
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 12:51
- Intergrals in a physics problem., robison, 12:48
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 12:46
- Re: Where is my error?, José Carlos Santos, 12:44
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 12:41
- Re: sin(n!), Robert Israel, 12:36
- Re: problem about measureble spaces, José Carlos Santos, 12:34
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 221), John Baez, 12:34
- Personality, psychometriclab, 12:28
- Making A List Of Integers, A Game, Leroy Quet, 12:27
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 12:25
- Re: problem about measureble spaces, Daniel Grubb, 12:22
- Re: Simple Linear Algebra Question, Robert Israel, 12:22
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 12:18
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 12:15
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Lee Rudolph, 12:10
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 12:05
- Re: My findings on series summation using reverse thinking in Fourier Methods..., alainverghote, 12:04
- Re: anything raised to zero, David Kastrup, 12:01
- Re: math books and beauty, luiroto, 12:01
- Re: infinity, briggs, 11:57
- Euler "Elemens d'algebre" in PDF version, Aebi Christian, 11:57
- Re: Algebraic closure of transcendental extensions and roots, Hagen, 11:55
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 11:51
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 11:47
- Re: anything raised to zero, Dave Seaman, 11:46
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 11:43
- Re: problem about measureble spaces, Jonas, 11:38
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 11:37
- Probabilities, birth years, and birthdays, john0714@xxxxxxx, 11:33
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 11:31
- Re: problem about measureble spaces, Jonas, 11:28
- Re: Where is my error?, Robert Low, 11:22
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 11:21
- Re: infinity, Torkel Franzen, 11:20
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 11:19
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 11:15
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, mathedman, 11:13
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 11:08
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Dik T. Winter, 11:07
- Re: anything raised to zero, mathedman, 11:07
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 11:05
- Re: Triangle inside an ellipsoid, David Eppstein, 10:59
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:59
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, fernando revilla, 10:53
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 10:53
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:53
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 10:49
- Re: Where is my error?, Hanford Carr, 10:45
- Re: Where is my error?, José Carlos Santos, 10:45
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 10:44
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 10:40
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 10:37
- Re: Rational vs irrational, A N Niel, 10:31
- Re: Rational vs irrational, quasi, 10:29
- Re: problem about measureble spaces, G. A. Edgar, 10:27
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:24
- Where is my error?, pfntjux, 10:18
- Re: problem about measureble spaces, José Carlos Santos, 10:15
- problem about measureble spaces, Jonas, 10:07
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 10:01
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 10:00
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, Androcles, 09:52
- Re: Limit, Antonia Senton, 09:48
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 09:41
- Re: elementary grpah theory, Randy Poe, 09:40
- Re: Nonzero derivative, Robert Low, 09:40
- Re: Nonzero derivative, José Carlos Santos, 09:35
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 09:32
- Re: Simple Linear Algebra Question, David C . Ullrich, 09:30
- Re: Limit, David C . Ullrich, 09:27
- Ramanujan and 2^4+2^4+3^4+4^4+4^4 = 5^4, titus_piezas, 09:25
- Nonzero derivative, olejman, 09:16
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 09:12
- Re: Simple Linear Algebra Question, David C . Ullrich, 09:09
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Robert Low, 09:03
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 08:54
- Re: a simple question on algebra (left/right identities and left/right inverses)., Arturo Magidin, 08:52
- Re: Limit, Antonia Senton, 08:51
- Re: a simple question on algebra (left/right identities and left/right inverses)., Arturo Magidin, 08:51
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 08:50
- Re: Limit, David C . Ullrich, 08:47
- Re: Limit, David C . Ullrich, 08:45
- Re: Analysis question, David C . Ullrich, 08:40
- Re: " Wanted a solution to 1/f(f(x)) = 1/f(x) +1/x , x > 0 ", alainverghote, 08:36
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Arturo Magidin, 08:35
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 08:32
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 08:21
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Robert Low, 08:20
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 08:16
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Dik T. Winter, 07:42
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Allan Adler, 07:36
- Re: Algebraic closure of transcendental extensions and roots, Wolff, 06:43
- The Ultimate Online Pharmaceutical, Doctor, 06:36
- Re: Triangle inside an ellipsoid, matt271829-news, 06:36
- Re: Triangle inside an ellipsoid, matt271829-news, 06:31
- MathAbacus.com website update, rayyan, 06:02
- Re: Is math a real science?, T.H. Ray, 05:58
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, bassam king karzeddin, 05:52
- Re: Limit, Antonia Senton, 05:51
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, PGreenfinch, 05:48
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 05:36
- Re: Limit, William Elliot, 05:35
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 05:20
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Richard Tobin, 05:05
- elementary grpah theory, Bob, 04:58
- Re: Greater-than-degree-5 equations, timrobinson, 04:57
- Re: Limit, Antonia Senton, 04:54
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 04:52
- Re: Greater-than-degree-5 equations, john_ramsden, 04:36
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Don Reble, 04:26
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Mathematics Lover, 04:21
- Re: Smashing a sphere, Robert Low, 04:21
- Re: Limit, William Elliot, 04:15
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, Virgil, 04:12
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 04:00
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 03:59
- Re: continuous functions, William Elliot, 03:55
- Re: " Wanted a solution to 1/f(f(x)) = 1/f(x) +1/x , x > 0 ", Han de Bruijn, 03:52
- Re: infinity, Torkel Franzen, 03:51
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 03:49
- Re: recurrence relations, Proginoskes, 03:47
- Re: Modeling human height and other non-negative value phenomenons, Timothy Little, 03:46
- Re: a simple question on algebra (left/right identities and left/right inverses)., William Elliot, 03:45
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 03:40
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 03:36
- Re: continuous functions, Proginoskes, 03:35
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Proginoskes, 03:27
- Re: Rational vs irrational, statcat, 03:24
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Proginoskes, 03:16
- Re: Rational vs irrational, statcat, 03:12
- Re: topology........, quasi, 03:05
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, Timothy Little, 03:05
- recurrence relations, Hellaeon, 03:02
- Re: " Wanted a solution to 1/f(f(x)) = 1/f(x) +1/x , x > 0 ", Timothy Little, 03:01
- Adjoint of Integral operator., Stephen, 03:01
- Re: mag5 stuff., mike4ty4, 03:00
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, bassam king karzeddin, 02:56
- Re: Rational vs irrational, quasi, 02:47
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 02:36
- Adjoint of Integral operator., Stephen, 02:28
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:06
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 02:02
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Clifford Nelson, 01:59
- Re: density of primes in rings of algebraic integers, quasi, 01:55
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:49
- Re: answer check relating to complex numbers, mike4ty4, 01:37
- Re: Rational vs irrational, mike4ty4, 01:30
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:26
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:14
- Re: sin(n!), mjc, 01:05
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 01:02
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 00:49
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 00:48
- Re: a simple question on algebra (left/right identities and left/right inverses)., Robert Israel, 00:36
- Re: infinity, stephen, 00:30
- density of primes in rings of algebraic integers, quasi, 00:27
- Re: Rational vs irrational, mike, 00:25
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, zzbunker, 00:21
- Re: a simple question on algebra (left/right identities and left/right inverses)., William Elliot, 00:12
- Re: topology........, William Elliot, 00:12
- Re: Simple Linear Algebra Question, Robert Israel, 00:09
- Re: Analysis question, mike, 00:05
September 21, 2005
- topology........, mina_world, 23:48
- Re: mag5 stuff., Robert Israel, 23:46
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Virgil, 23:42
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Proginoskes, 23:36
- Re: math is more subjective than art appreciation, Virgil, 23:33
- Re: infinity, stephen, 23:33
- Re: Rational vs irrational, Arturo Magidin, 23:33
- Rational vs irrational, statcat, 23:28
- Re: Greater-than-degree-5 equations, usr.root@xxxxxxxxx, 23:20
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:57
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:47
- Re: strategy for an instant, elementary proof of FLT, quasi, 22:35
- Greater-than-degree-5 equations, mike4ty4, 22:30
- Re: sin(n!), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:26
- Re: mag5 stuff., mike4ty4, 22:17
- math is more subjective than art appreciation, finance hotshot, 22:17
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:14
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 22:05
- Re: answer check relating to complex numbers, usr.root@xxxxxxxxx, 21:59
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 21:55
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 21:51
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Proginoskes, 21:45
- Re: Smashing a sphere, W. Dale Hall, 21:37
- Re: small but infinite sets, Dik T. Winter, 21:18
- Re: Proof that suspension cables are catenaries, Russell, 20:54
- Re: Proof that suspension cables are catenaries, Rick Decker, 20:49
- My findings on series summation using reverse thinking in Fourier Methods..., lucy, 20:42
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:38
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:36
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Gregory L. Hansen, 20:27
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, T.H. Ray, 20:17
- a simple question on algebra (left/right identities and left/right inverses)., porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:13
- Re: Proof that suspension cables are catenaries, Rick Decker, 20:09
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:53
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:48
- Re: Simple Linear Algebra Question, Jason Pawloski, 19:45
- Re: Simple Linear Algebra Question, Jim Spriggs, 19:44
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 19:27
- Re: Proof that suspension cables are catenaries, temptony, 19:25
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:22
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:19
- Simple Linear Algebra Question, Jason Pawloski, 19:14
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:12
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:10
- Re: answer check relating to complex numbers, Jim Spriggs, 19:06
- Re: Triangle inside an ellipsoid, M.A.Fajjal, 19:04
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:03
- Re: Triangle inside an ellipsoid, snapdragon31, 19:02
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:54
- Re: hard task, William Elliot, 18:54
- Re: Smashing a sphere, Keith A. Lewis, 18:50
- Re: mag5 stuff., William Elliot, 18:48
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:47
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 18:34
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:31
- answer check relating to complex numbers, jeffa, 18:29
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, bill, 18:21
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, matt271829-news, 18:09
- Re: Proof that suspension cables are catenaries, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 18:06
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 17:58
- Re: infinity, stephen, 17:57
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Dave Rusin, 17:55
- Re: sin(n!), bill, 17:50
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 17:45
- Re: infinity, Jeremy Boden, 17:43
- Re: Triangle inside an ellipsoid, matt271829-news, 17:41
- Re: A question about SO(2), computer, 17:34
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, fernando revilla, 17:30
- Re: is this continuous bijection a homeomorphism?, wakaba, 17:25
- Re: " Wanted a solution to 1/f(f(x)) = 1/f(x) +1/x , x > 0 ", Robert Israel, 17:13
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 17:12
- Re: Smashing a sphere, Robert Low, 17:04
- Re: Triangle inside an ellipsoid, snapdragon31, 17:02
- Re: small but infinite sets, David R Tribble, 16:54
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:47
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:44
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:43
- Re: Modeling human height and other non-negative value phenomenons, Brablo, 16:40
- Re: Modeling human height and other non-negative value phenomenons, Randy Poe, 16:38
- Re: Proof that suspension cables are catenaries, Brablo, 16:38
- Re: sin(n!), dwwdkddb, 16:30
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:14
- Re: Modeling human height and other non-negative value phenomenons, Phil Sherrod, 16:13
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:10
- Re: Analysis question, Herman Rubin, 16:09
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:07
- Triangle inside an ellipsoid, M.A.Fajjal, 16:05
- Re: sin(n!), magozderfuge, 16:04
- Re: sin(n!), Nathan, 16:03
- Re: mag5 stuff., mike4ty4, 15:57
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 15:47
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:46
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 15:45
- Re: anything raised to zero, A N Niel, 15:36
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:34
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:29
- Re: A question about SO(2), Ed Hook, 15:27
- Re: sin(n!), Robert Israel, 15:21
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:16
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:15
- Re: anything raised to zero, matt271829-news, 15:14
- Re: anything raised to zero, A N Niel, 15:07
- math books and beauty, dwwdkddb, 15:07
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 15:03
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 15:03
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:02
- Re: " Wanted a solution to 1/f(f(x)) = 1/f(x) +1/x , x > 0 ", G. A. Edgar, 15:01
- Re: Proof that suspension cables are catenaries, A N Niel, 14:51
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:50
- Re: Is math a real science?, Herman Rubin, 14:48
- Re: " Wanted a solution to 1/f(f(x)) = 1/f(x) +1/x , x > 0 ", G. A. Edgar, 14:48
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:43
- Re: Limit, Antonia Senton, 14:43
- Re: Modeling human height and other non-negative value phenomenons, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:42
- Re: Is math a real science?, Herman Rubin, 14:41
- Re: anything raised to zero, Arturo Magidin, 14:40
- Re: sin(n!), Randy Poe, 14:40
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:36
- Pythagorean Ratios, charleswehner, 14:36
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:35
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:32
- Re: sin(n!), magozderfuge, 14:30
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, Narasimham, 14:29
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:28
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:24
- Modeling human height and other non-negative value phenomenons, Brablo, 14:20
- A question about SO(2), computer, 14:20
- anything raised to zero, woodland, 14:19
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 14:15
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:14
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:53
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 13:51
- Re: constructing an Array or Partitioning for Infinitude of Perfect Numbers, a_plutonium, 13:50
- " Wanted a solution to 1/f(f(x)) = 1/f(x) +1/x , x > 0 ", alainverghote, 13:48
- Re: infinity, stephen, 13:37
- constructing an Array or Partitioning for Infinitude of Perfect Numbers, a_plutonium, 13:20
- Re: Limit, Antonia Senton, 13:19
- Proof that suspension cables are catenaries, Brablo, 13:18
- Re: Limit, Antonia Senton, 13:17
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 13:09
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:08
- Re: Limit, A N Niel, 13:08
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 13:03
- Re: Real Analysis, Arturo Magidin, 12:58
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:50
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, Michael Orion, 12:48
- Real Analysis, jennifer, 12:43
- Real Analysis, jennifer, 12:43
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 12:38
- Re: Limit, José Carlos Santos, 12:26
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, matt271829-news, 12:25
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 12:23
- Re: Isometries, José Carlos Santos, 12:22
- yule-walker function help, nanonewton, 12:08
- Isometries, computer, 12:05
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 12:04
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, Richard Tobin, 12:00
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 11:58
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 11:53
- Re: continuity, G. A. Edgar, 11:52
- efficient solution to x^2 = k mod a^k-1, k odd prime, mpenguin, 11:51
- Using the proof of Goldbach to help prove Infinitude of Perfect Numbers, a_plutonium, 11:51
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 11:49
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 11:48
- Re: infinity, Torkel Franzen, 11:41
- Re: sin(n!), dwwdkddb, 11:38
- Re: Renewal theorem (Feller) AND/OR Number Theory, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:34
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, Jonathan Hoyle, 11:34
- Re: Tester Theorem: A New Theorem in math that tells us whether a concept of math is well-defined or ill-defined, a_plutonium, 11:31
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 11:28
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 221), john_ramsden, 11:28
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 11:25
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, Arturo Magidin, 11:23
- Re: Random Variables, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:22
- Re: continuity, Randy Poe, 11:22
- Re: anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, C. Bond, 11:19
- Re: MathWorld complaint, Ioannis, 11:17
- continuity, jennifer, 11:13
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 11:13
- anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, jennifer, 11:11
- anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, jennifer, 11:11
- anything to the power of 0 = 1, why????, jennifer, 11:11
- Re: Smashing a sphere, Keith A. Lewis, 11:09
- Re: sin(n!), Randy Poe, 11:07
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Daniel Grubb, 10:57
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 10:53
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Daniel Grubb, 10:52
- Re: Analysis question, mike, 10:52
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:43
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Dave Seaman, 10:43
- Re: Probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 10:39
- Re: Probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 10:37
- Re: sin(n!), Alois Steindl, 10:36
- sin(n!), magozderfuge, 10:34
- Re: Unorthodox(?) mathematical theory of voting, mdavis20886, 10:34
- Re: infinity, Torkel Franzen, 10:29
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 10:24
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, abe . buckingham, 09:59
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, abe . buckingham, 09:56
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, johnicholas . hines, 09:55
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, The Qurqirish Dragon, 09:49
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Daniel Grubb, 09:40
- Re: Analysis question, ManOfLight, 09:38
- Re: Analysis question, ManOfLight, 09:34
- Re: Analysis question, Robert Low, 09:25
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 09:23
- Re: infinity, Robert Low, 09:18
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 09:18
- Limit, anz3, 09:16
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 09:15
- Efficient algorithms for multidimensional patterns, Lucian Sasu, 09:07
- Re: PDE book recommendation, Stephen, 09:03
- Coset leader of a coset code of RS codes, jaco . versfeld, 08:52
- Re: Analysis question, David C . Ullrich, 08:39
- Re: Analysis question, mike, 08:38
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 08:35
- Re: Representation of Functions, David C . Ullrich, 08:33
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 08:28
- a real identity problem (was: injective polynomial f: k x k -> k, G. A. Edgar, 08:12
- Stanley Tennenbaum, Allan Adler, 08:04
- Re: Representation of Functions, Valeriu Anisiu, 07:57
- Analysis question, ManOfLight, 07:47
- Re: strategy for an instant, elementary proof of FLT, john_ramsden, 07:13
- How can i derive the lognormal & Rayleigh Probability density function ?, Sungkyu Ko, 07:10
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 221), jmfbahciv, 07:05
- The Ultimate Online Pharmaceutical, Doctor, 07:02
- Re: is this continuous bijection a homeomorphism?, Lee Rudolph, 06:52
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, matt271829-news, 06:37
- generalized eigenvalues of wishart matrices, jonagold, 06:21
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 06:21
- Re: is this continuous bijection a homeomorphism?, José Carlos Santos, 06:09
- Renewal theorem (Feller) AND/OR Number Theory, Paweł, 05:58
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 05:56
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Timothy Little, 05:43
- Re: is this continuous bijection a homeomorphism?, Robert Low, 05:37
- Re: Is math a real science?, T.H. Ray, 05:36
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Timothy Little, 05:25
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Dik T. Winter, 05:25
- Re: is this continuous bijection a homeomorphism?, José Carlos Santos, 05:22
- Re: mag5 stuff., William Elliot, 05:19
- MathWorld complaint, José Carlos Santos, 05:16
- Re: Representation of Functions, Maury Barbato, 05:05
- Re: Is math a real science?, dedanoe, 04:52
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, William Elliot, 04:49
- Re: Continuous Injections, Maury Barbato, 04:49
- Re: is this continuous bijection a homeomorphism?, William Elliot, 04:31
- So, why go to your local dr@gstore?, "Greenberg", 04:15
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 04:12
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Bill Dubuque, 04:11
- Re: Robin Chapman, john_ramsden, 04:05
- Re: Robin Chapman, john_ramsden, 04:03
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 04:02
- Re: [OT] Robin Chapman, Han de Bruijn, 03:57
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 03:55
- Re: Is math a real science?, Han de Bruijn, 03:48
- Re: Is math a real science?, Han de Bruijn, 03:45
- Re: Is math a real science?, Han de Bruijn, 03:42
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 03:37
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 03:30
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 03:23
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 03:03
- Tester Theorem: A New Theorem in math that tells us whether a concept of math is well-defined or ill-defined, a_plutonium, 02:37
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:26
- The Ultimate Online Pharmaceutical, Doctor, 02:19
- Re: Random Variables, Proginoskes, 02:17
- Re: An alternate proof that 144 is the only square Fibonacci number > 1?, Proginoskes, 02:10
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Gerry Myerson, 02:07
- Re: A number theory question, Gerry Myerson, 02:03
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 02:00
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 01:49
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 01:47
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 01:46
- Re: The Pigeonhole Principle-1 pigeon 0 holes?, snapdragon31, 01:41
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 01:24
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 01:16
- Re: Relationship between mathematics and music, daniel_anthony_stearns, 01:10
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:06
- Random Variables, lusots, 01:03
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:59
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:53
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:49
- Re: injective polynomial f: k x k -> k, quasi, 00:45
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:45
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:43
- injectivity of sums of univariate polynomials, quasi, 00:37
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:33
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:31
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:20
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:14
- Re: f(x1)+g(y1)=f(x2)+g(y2), quasi, 00:06
September 20, 2005
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 23:59
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, NotP, 23:45
- An alternate proof that 144 is the only square Fibonacci number > 1?, Anthony Buckland, 23:43
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, NotP, 23:41
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 23:34
- Re: Categorty theory - adding apples and oranges - disjoint union example needed, Tony, 23:10
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 23:07
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:58
- Re: Smashing a sphere, Robert Israel, 22:30
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 22:22
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Robert Israel, 22:17
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Virgil, 22:15
- Smashing a sphere, Robert Pullerman, 22:14
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Gerry Myerson, 22:07
- Re: small but infinite sets, Proginoskes, 21:59
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Gregory L. Hansen, 21:58
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, Proginoskes, 21:54
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:41
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 21:39
- Re: small but infinite sets, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 21:35
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:25
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 21:05
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Gerry Myerson, 20:58
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Gerry Myerson, 20:47
- Re: terminology for a remainder of division, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:43
- Re: Limit over a base, Marc Mertens, 20:34
- Re: Algebraic Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, Jack Leitner, 20:34
- Re: Limit over a base, Marc Mertens, 20:31
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 20:21
- Re: residue and integral! Very wierd, I could not get my sign right... very annoying..., Russell, 20:14
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 20:14
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 20:12
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 20:09
- Re: Probability problem--stupid error, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:08
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 20:01
- terminology for a remainder of division, mikharakiri_nospaum, 19:55
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Dik T. Winter, 19:48
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, NotP, 19:46
- small but infinite sets, David R Tribble, 19:44
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 19:43
- Re: Sudoku Construction ?, David Eppstein, 19:36
- Re: Is math a real science?, T.H. Ray, 18:56
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 18:50
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Dik T. Winter, 18:44
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 18:39
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Dik T. Winter, 18:29
- Re: The recurrence problem, mathfan, 18:25
- Re: The recurrence problem, mathfan, 18:25
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Dik T. Winter, 18:24
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 18:14
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 18:07
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 18:06
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 18:05
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 17:59
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 17:55
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 17:54
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, T.H. Ray, 17:45
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 17:41
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 221), John Baez, 17:32
- Re: What mathematical question would you ask Judge Roberts?, Mathematics Lover, 17:31
- Re: What mathematical question would you ask Judge Roberts?, Mathematics Lover, 17:27
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 17:24
- Re: Probability problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 17:20
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Robert Low, 17:19
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Robert Low, 17:11
- Re: ellipsoid, Robert Israel, 17:11
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 17:11
- Re: Representation of Functions, Valeriu Anisiu, 17:10
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 17:10
- Looking for simple spline analysis equations, mark, 17:06
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 17:00
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 17:00
- Re: Probability problem, tlicious, 16:55
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 16:54
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 16:54
- Re: f(x1)+g(y1)=f(x2)+g(y2), quasi, 16:53
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Dave Seaman, 16:53
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:48
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture, T.H. Ray, 16:48
- mag5 stuff., mike4ty4, 16:46
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 16:46
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 16:45
- Re: The recurrence problem, Robert Israel, 16:45
- isometry group, end_isolation, 16:43
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 16:39
- bibliophilic editions, dwwdkddb, 16:38
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:38
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:36
- Re: Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, William Elliot, 16:31
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 16:26
- Re: Representation of Functions, James Dolan, 16:24
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 16:22
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:20
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 16:12
- Re: f(x1)+g(y1)=f(x2)+g(y2), quasi, 16:11
- Re: Robin Chapman, odin, 16:10
- Re: injective polynomial f: k x k -> k, quasi, 16:05
- ellipsoid, bob, 16:04
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:02
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 15:58
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:56
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:53
- Re: Robin Chapman, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:52
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:47
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:45
- [OT] Robin Chapman, Jim Spriggs, 15:44
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:42
- Re: If and only if, Virgil, 15:40
- Re: Representation of Functions, Dave Rusin, 15:38
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 15:37
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:35
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 15:34
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:33
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 15:29
- Re: What mathematical question would you ask Judge Roberts?, Herman Rubin, 15:27
- Re: Representation of Functions, The World Wide Wade, 15:27
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:25
- Re: injective polynomial f: k x k -> k, Robert Israel, 15:25
- Re: Representation of Functions, The World Wide Wade, 15:25
- Re: hard task, klawesyn28@xxxxxxxx, 15:24
- Re: hard task, klawesyn28@xxxxxxxx, 15:23
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:22
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:18
- Re: Representation of Functions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:17
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:15
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 15:15
- Re: infinity, Robert Low, 15:14
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Arturo Magidin, 15:12
- Re: Representation of Functions, Valeriu Anisiu, 15:07
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 15:07
- Re: combinatorics, klawesyn28, 15:05
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:05
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:53
- Re: Continuous Injections, The World Wide Wade, 14:53
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 14:48
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:44
- Re: Representation of Functions, Lee Rudolph, 14:43
- Re: injective polynomial f: k x k -> k, quasi, 14:36
- f(x1)+g(y1)=f(x2)+g(y2), quasi, 14:35
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 14:34
- Re: Limit over a base, Dave L. Renfro, 14:33
- Re: residue and integral! Very wierd, I could not get my sign right... very annoying..., lucy, 14:32
- Re: Tensor product in Algebra, Jannick Asmus, 14:31
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 14:31
- Re: What mathematical question would you ask Judge Roberts?, Mathematics Lover, 14:28
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:22
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:21
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:20
- Re: Tensor product in Algebra, Jose Capco, 14:17
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Robert Low, 14:16
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:16
- Re: injective polynomial f: k x k -> k, NotP, 14:05
- Re: Representation of Functions, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:04
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:01
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 14:01
- Re: Great Math Books for High School Students?, masteg1, 13:58
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, man_in_black529, 13:52
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Dave Seaman, 13:32
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:28
- Re: Probability problem, Dave Seaman, 13:26
- Re: Representation of Functions, David C. Ullrich, 13:24
- Re: 3 simple infinite sums with harmonic numbers, Leroy Quet, 13:24
- Re: Integral problem, change in variable, robison, 13:23
- Re: Pleas help me about un equation of third degree, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 13:19
- Meta-mathematical: CS -> Math, Denis Bueno, 13:18
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Arturo Magidin, 13:17
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 13:15
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 13:14
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 13:06
- Re: Is the book wrong in expanding a function into series?, Ronald Bruck, 13:05
- Re: confusion on limit/integral does not exist, not defined, infinite?, Ronald Bruck, 13:03
- Re: infinity, Jiri Lebl, 13:01
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 12:57
- Re: injective polynomial f: k x k -> k, quasi, 12:57
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 12:52
- Re: Making Sense of Tony, Tony Orlow, 12:44
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:44
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:42
- Is {0} a ring with unity? Was: Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 12:37
- Representation of Functions, Maury Barbato, 12:25
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, matt271829-news, 12:23
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 12:22
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 12:22
- Re: dot product, computer, 12:20
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 12:15
- Re: Probability problem, tlicious, 12:14
- Re: The recurrence problem, mathfan, 12:13
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:12
- Continuous Injections, Maury Barbato, 12:10
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:08
- Re: Why is(was) Bourbaki dangerous?, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:07
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Arturo Magidin, 12:07
- Local time, Brownian motion, legomir2000, 11:51
- Re: injective polynomial f: k x k -> k, Robert Israel, 11:51
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 11:39
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 11:34
- Re: Sudoku Construction ?, bill.daly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:30
- Re: Countability of the Rationals, Dave Seaman, 11:26
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jiri Lebl, 11:25
- Re: Probability problem, Dave Seaman, 11:09
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 11:04
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 11:03
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jiri Lebl, 10:57
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:54
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 10:54
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:52
- Re: If and only if, alexandru . lupas, 10:49
- Re: chain rule, richard_lavoie, 10:46
- Proof by topology, Tom, 10:46
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:41
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 10:26
- Re: infinity, Torkel Franzen, 10:22
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, bassam king karzeddin, 10:14
- Re: The recurrence problem, Robert Low, 10:09
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 10:06
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, brian a m stuckless, 10:05
- Re: Why is(was) Bourbaki dangerous?, Chan-Ho Suh, 10:05
- Re: The recurrence problem, Dana, 10:04
- Re: infinity, Robert Low, 10:04
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 10:04
- Re: Another localization question,,, Jannick Asmus, 10:01
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 09:59
- Countability of the Rationals, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 09:56
- Re: Lie algebra homomorphism, Lie groups question,,, Jannick Asmus, 09:55
- Re: Probability problem, Dan Cass, 09:54
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 09:53
- Re: infinity, Torkel Franzen, 09:52
- Re: The Pigeonhole Principle-1 pigeon 0 holes?, abe . buckingham, 09:48
- Re: The recurrence problem, mathfan, 09:41
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 09:40
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:26
- Re: Categorty theory - adding apples and oranges - disjoint union example needed, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:15
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Dik T. Winter, 05:43
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, a_plutonium, 01:51
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:41
- Re: Spearman's rank correlation and metric, Ray Koopman, 01:17
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:05
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:41
- The recurrence problem, mathfan, 00:29
- Re: Two problems on integrands with branch points..., lucy, 00:13
September 19, 2005
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:06
- PDE book recommendation, vsgdp, 22:02
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Robert Israel, 21:56
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:52
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 21:50
- Re: Probability problem, Dave Seaman, 21:44
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:43
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:42
- Re: Probability problem, Randy Poe, 21:37
- measure theory, Sobo, 21:31
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:31
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 21:31
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:30
- Re: Real Variables 1, Robert Israel, 21:23
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, matt271829-news, 21:16
- Re: Categorty theory - adding apples and oranges - disjoint union example needed, Rick Decker, 21:09
- Re: hard task, Keith A. Lewis, 21:08
- Re: I have correct proof of 4-color theorem, Rick Decker, 21:03
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, AK47, 20:52
- Re: Categorty theory - adding apples and oranges - disjoint union example needed, Tony, 20:46
- Re: Why is(was) Bourbaki dangerous?, Tony, 20:38
- Re: I have correct proof of 4-color theorem, cuishitai12000, 20:35
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Ken Quirici, 20:29
- Re: Why is(was) Bourbaki dangerous?, Jim Spriggs, 20:25
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 20:25
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 20:23
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:22
- Spearman's rank correlation and metric, teppotulppu, 20:16
- Re: Why is(was) Bourbaki dangerous?, Tony, 19:57
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 19:34
- Re: If and only if, johnicholas . hines, 19:34
- Re: Categorty theory - adding apples and oranges - disjoint union example needed, Tony, 19:33
- Re: Navigation formulas, Default User, 19:26
- Re: injective polynomial f: k x k -> k, Gerry Myerson, 19:26
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 19:22
- Re: hard task, Gerry Myerson, 19:20
- Re: Algebraic Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, george ghiata, 19:13
- Re: Isolated points, Proginoskes, 19:11
- Re: Real Variables 1, Gerry Myerson, 19:11
- Re: Why is(was) Bourbaki dangerous?, Tony, 19:11
- Re: dot product, The World Wide Wade, 19:10
- Re: Real Variables 1, Gerry Myerson, 19:10
- Re: combinatorics, Gerry Myerson, 19:08
- Re: Real Variables 1, Gerry Myerson, 19:02
- Re: Isolated points, Gerry Myerson, 18:59
- Re: vectors?, Proginoskes, 18:38
- Re: hard task, Proginoskes, 18:36
- Re: Sudoku Construction ?, Timothy Little, 18:35
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Schoenfeld, 18:30
- Re: Sphere inside a pyramid, Timothy Little, 18:25
- Re: Why is(was) Bourbaki dangerous?, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:21
- Re: Sudoko questions, Gary McGuire, 18:19
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 18:19
- Re: A.P. Conjecture of Infinite Prime Tool: give me primes of a form, Kees, 18:12
- Re: Why is(was) Bourbaki dangerous?, William Elliot, 17:54
- Re: Why is(was) Bourbaki dangerous?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 17:51
- Re: hard task, William Elliot, 17:50
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 17:49
- vectors?, WC, 17:43
- Re: New approach to trigonometry, Jim Spriggs, 17:36
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Proginoskes, 17:35
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 17:24
- Re: Limit over a base, Jim Spriggs, 17:21
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 17:16
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:16
- Re: Limit over a base, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 17:08
- Re: A.P. Conjecture of Infinite Prime Tool: give me primes of a form such, denis feldmann, 17:08
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, denis feldmann, 17:07
- Re: Real Variables 1, mathman, 16:55
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 16:48
- Re: Localization question,,, James, 16:48
- New approach to trigonometry, David R Tribble, 16:46
- Re: Categorty theory - adding apples and oranges - disjoint union example needed, James Dolan, 16:29
- Representations of SU(2) question,,, James, 16:24
- Lie algebra homomorphism, Lie groups question,,, James, 16:09
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 16:07
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Dik T. Winter, 16:03
- Re: injective polynomial f: k x k -> k, Dik T. Winter, 16:01
- Re: How to reversely find function from its Fourier Series Expansion?, robert bristow-johnson, 15:42
- Re: why there are no Odd Perfect Numbers (not including 1) Re:, Dik T. Winter, 09:56
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 09:25
September 18, 2005
- Re: Why is(was) Bourbaki dangerous?, Dik T. Winter, 21:02
- Re: confusion on limit/integral does not exist, not defined, infinite?, Dik T. Winter, 20:31
- Re: strategy for an instant, elementary proof of FLT, Dik T. Winter, 20:16
- Re: Algebraic Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, Dik T. Winter, 19:34
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Dik T. Winter, 19:19
- inequality question, c.rowat@xxxxxxxxxx, 14:05
- Re: proof of Infinitude Perfect Numbers and 1 is the only odd perfect number Re: Infinitude of Twin Primes and Goldbach use the same proof technique Re:, a_plutonium, 13:36
- Prime number checking without factoring, Jon Slaughter, 13:33
- Re: " A REPLY TO MR> ANDREW WILES PROOF OF FLT-step 2", george ghiata, 13:32
- Re: looking for a proof, Ed Hook, 13:30
- proof of Infinitude Perfect Numbers and 1 is the only odd perfect number Re: Infinitude of Twin Primes and Goldbach use the same proof technique Re:, a_plutonium, 13:27
- hard task, klawesyn28, 13:24
- " A REPLY TO MR> ANDREW WILES PROOF OF FLT-step 2", george ghiata, 13:23
- Re: Congruence question a^f(m) = 2 mod (m), A N Niel, 13:16
- Re: How to reversely find function from its Fourier Series Expansion?, glen herrmannsfeldt, 13:05
- Re: strategy for an instant, elementary proof of FLT, quasi, 12:42
- Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 12:14
- Re: strategy for an instant, elementary proof of FLT, quasi, 11:45
- Re: Categorty theory - adding apples and oranges - disjoint union example needed, Lee Rudolph, 09:54
- looking for a proof, Someonekicked, 09:53
- Eigenvector extraction, Fijoy George, 09:49
- Re: Categorty theory - adding apples and oranges - disjoint union example needed, barr, 09:30
- Re: Categorty theory - adding apples and oranges - disjoint union example needed, barr, 09:30
- Re: How to reversely find function from its Fourier Series Expansion?, robert bristow-johnson, 09:28
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture, T.H. Ray, 09:14
- Re: Symmetries of non regular hexagon, N. Silver, 09:10
- Symmetries of non regular hexagon, jeffa, 08:41
- Re: How to reversely find function from its Fourier Series Expansion?, A N Niel, 05:47
September 16, 2005
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 13:46
- Re: Is math a real science?, PD, 08:52
- Re: Is math a real science?, jmfbahciv, 06:59
- Re: Is math a real science?, Lee Rudolph, 06:53
- Re: Is math a real science?, David Kastrup, 06:38
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 06:29
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 06:25
- Re: Is math a real science?, Herman Jurjus, 03:37
- Re: Is math a real science?, David Kastrup, 03:01
- Re: Is math a real science?, David Kastrup, 02:54
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 00:02
September 15, 2005
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 23:12
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 23:03
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 23:01
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 22:57
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 22:55
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 22:49
- Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 22:14
- Re: Is math a real science?, mountain man, 21:28
- Re: Is math a real science?, Bob Cain, 20:25
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 18:16
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 16:24
- Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 16:22
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 16:16
- Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 15:23
- Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 15:20
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 14:18
- Re: Is math a real science?, ArtflDodgr, 14:13
- Re: Is math a real science?, PD, 14:01
- Re: Is math a real science?, Herman Rubin, 13:04
- Re: Is math a real science?, Richard Henry, 12:43
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 12:42
- Re: Is math a real science?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:49
- Re: Is math a real science?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:23
- Re: Is math a real science?, Gregory L. Hansen, 11:20
- Re: Is math a real science?, Plasmid, 11:18
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 10:50
- Re: Is math a real science?, PD, 10:45
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 10:24
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 09:53
- Re: Is math a real science?, Han de Bruijn, 09:52
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 09:50
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 09:46
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, jaapsch, 09:36
- Re: Is math a real science?, David Kastrup, 09:14
- Re: Is math a real science?, mountain man, 09:12
- Re: Is math a real science?, David Kastrup, 09:08
- Re: Is math a real science?, David Kastrup, 09:06
- Re: Is math a real science?, PD, 09:01
- Re: Is math a real science?, PD, 08:54
- Re: Is math a real science?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:28
- Re: Is math a real science?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:16
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 07:44
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 07:42
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 05:35
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 05:32
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 05:28
- Re: Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 05:25
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, Willem, 05:20
- Re: Is math a real science?, Han de Bruijn, 04:49
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, guenter, 04:47
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, guenter, 04:43
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, guenter, 04:39
- Re: Is math a real science?, David Kastrup, 04:14
- Re: Is math a real science?, Han de Bruijn, 03:44
- Re: Is math a real science?, Han de Bruijn, 03:39
- Re: Is math a real science?, Han de Bruijn, 03:35
September 14, 2005
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 23:27
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 23:17
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:53
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 22:01
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 21:41
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 21:09
- Re: In(equality) with golden section ?, alexandru . lupas, 21:02
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 20:24
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 20:11
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 20:01
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 19:46
- Re: In(equality) with golden section ?, Robert Israel, 19:22
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 18:47
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 18:39
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 18:07
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, Mark P, 18:06
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 18:01
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 17:54
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 17:53
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 17:24
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, Proginoskes, 16:23
- Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 16:21
- In(equality) with golden section ?, alexandru . lupas, 16:17
- Re: Is math a real science?, NotP, 16:08
- Re: Is math a real science?, Minus XVII, 15:48
- Re: Is math a real science?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 15:23
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 15:14
- Re: Is math a real science?, Herman Rubin, 15:13
- Re: Is math a real science?, Gregory L. Hansen, 15:11
- Re: Is math a real science?, Igor, 14:57
- Re: Is math a real science?, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:56
- Re: Is math a real science?, Orion, 14:51
- Re: Is math a real science?, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:49
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:48
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:43
- Re: Is math a real science?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:42
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:40
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 14:39
- Re: infinity, Tony Orlow, 14:38
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 14:37
- Re: Is math a real science?, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:37
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 14:35
- Re: Is math a real science?, PD, 14:35
- Re: Is math a real science?, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:35
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 14:34
- Re: Is math a real science?, Jim Spriggs, 14:32
- Re: Please help!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:31
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:30
- Re: variable substitution, robison . jack, 14:28
- Please help!, James Wanless, 14:25
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:23
- Re: Is math a real science?, PD, 14:23
- Re: Is math a real science?, Duane Bozarth, 14:22
- Re: variable substitution, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:21
- Re: Is math a real science?, Duane Bozarth, 14:20
- Re: Is math a real science?, Duane Bozarth, 14:19
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 14:17
- Re: Is math a real science?, Duane Bozarth, 14:17
- Re: variable substitution, Jim Spriggs, 14:14
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:13
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:13
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:12
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Gregory L. Hansen, 14:09
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Gregory L. Hansen, 14:06
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:05
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:05
- variable substitution, robison . jack, 14:01
- Re: quadratic curve in projective plane, computer, 13:59
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 13:57
- Re: Mega M&Ms in a jar, Russell, 13:57
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:52
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:51
- Re: average size of the antichain, sasha mal, 13:45
- Re: Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 13:44
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 13:43
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 13:42
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 13:41
- Re: Point Inside a triangle, Dave Seaman, 13:38
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 13:38
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 13:38
- Re: Is math a real science?, finance hotshot, 13:36
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:36
- Re: infinity, stephen, 13:36
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:33
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 13:23
- Re: Infinite Dedekind-Finite Set, Herman Rubin, 13:20
- Revisiting my (alleged) proof of the Goldbach Conjecture, a_plutonium, 13:19
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:16
- Re: quadratic curve in projective plane, Robert Israel, 13:15
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 13:14
- Re: Integral of f(x)=x^x...??, Robert Low, 13:10
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:08
- Re: Need help on differential equation and optimization problem, Robert Israel, 13:06
- Re: Integral of f(x)=x^x...??, G. A. Edgar, 13:05
- Re: Argument of quotient, Hanford Carr, 13:04
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:04
- Re: Is math a real science?, donstockbauer, 13:02
- MAKING MONEY FAST, davidloeffert, 12:59
- Re: Algebra question, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake, 12:57
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 12:56
- Re: Integral of f(x)=x^x...??, Ioannis, 12:55
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 12:54
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 12:52
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:48
- Re: Algebra question, Arturo Magidin, 12:47
- Re: Integral of f(x)=x^x...??, Jim Spriggs, 12:46
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:45
- Algebra question, Newbie, 12:44
- Re: Geometric Interpretation of an Order Relation, Sean Holman, 12:42
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:42
- Point Inside a triangle, George, 12:39
- Properties of nonexistents (was Re: infinity), stephen, 12:34
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:32
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 12:26
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 12:25
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 12:21
- Re: Is math a real science?, , 12:20
- Re: Is math a real science?, , 12:18
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 12:18
- Re: Is math a real science?, Uncle Al, 12:17
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Herman Rubin, 12:14
- Geometric Interpretation of an Order Relation, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 12:14
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:12
- Re: infinity, stephen, 12:09
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 12:09
- Re: Integral of f(x)=x^x...??, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 12:07
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 12:06
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:04
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 12:03
- Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 12:01
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:00
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 11:57
- Re: infinity, stephen, 11:55
- Re: Is math a real science?, NotP, 11:52
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 11:50
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:50
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 11:49
- Re: Mega M&Ms in a jar, gcotterl, 11:46
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 11:44
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:42
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 11:42
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 11:40
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:37
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:33
- Re: Integral of f(x)=x^x...??, A N Niel, 11:33
- quadratic curve in projective plane, computer, 11:29
- Re: infinity, Jiri Lebl, 11:28
- Re: TOmatic limits, Randy Poe, 11:02
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 11:00
- Re: infinity, Jiri Lebl, 10:53
- Re: Is math a real science?, Arnold, 10:47
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:46
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:43
- Re: TOmatic limits, Randy Poe, 10:43
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:39
- Re: Argument of quotient, john_ramsden, 10:38
- Re: Please nominate me for Abel Prize, mathedman, 10:34
- Re: Argument of quotient, Robert Low, 10:31
- Re: Is math a real science?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 10:31
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 10:28
- Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 10:14
- Re: Argument of quotient, Diana, 10:12
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, jaapsch, 10:11
- Re: How many games of chess are there?, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:08
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 09:58
- Re: Is math a real science?, David Kastrup, 09:57
- Re: Argument of quotient, Robert Low, 09:52
- Re: Let's talk about continuity, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 09:51
- Re: Is math a real science?, Androcles, 09:50
- Argument of quotient, Diana, 09:49
- Re: open map, David C . Ullrich, 09:49
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 09:47
- Re: Integral of f(x)=x^x...??, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 09:43
- Re: Please help: I need to create a midi file using C language and "truncated fourier series", David C . Ullrich, 09:34
- Re: LaTeX question, dwwdkddb, 09:33
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 09:28
- Re: open map, José Carlos Santos, 09:27
- Re: Is math a real science?, Robert J. Kolker, 09:25
- Re: Jordan measure, David C . Ullrich, 09:25
- Re: Mega M&Ms in a jar, Randy Poe, 09:20
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, David C . Ullrich, 09:20
- Re: Integral of f(x)=x^x...??, Mat Cross, 09:16
- Re: Infinite Dedekind-Finite Set, David C . Ullrich, 09:11
- Re: Jordan measure, G. A. Edgar, 08:09
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, guenter, 08:04
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 07:50
- Re: Integral of f(x)=x^x...??, Patrick, 07:45
- Re: Integral of f(x)=x^x...??, David Kastrup, 07:44
- Integral of f(x)=x^x...??, Robert Bralic, 07:34
- open map, singau, 07:31
- Re: Is math a real science?, donstockbauer, 07:29
- Re: Please help: I need to create a midi file using C language and "truncated fourier series", david, 07:14
- Re: Please nominate me for Abel Prize, William Elliot, 07:06
- Re: Is math a real science?, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel, 06:49
- Re: Dirac delta function, Robert Low, 06:41
- Dirac delta function, Zinc Potterman, 05:56
- Please nominate me for Abel Prize, Victor Porton, 05:53
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, jaap, 05:08
- Re: LaTeX question, José Carlos Santos, 05:04
- Re: Derivative of functionals with respect to functions (?), Hong Sup Lee, 05:01
- Re: Derivative of functionals with respect to functions (?), Hong Sup Lee, 04:54
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, john_ramsden, 04:32
- Re: Is math a real science?, mmeron, 04:28
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Han de Bruijn, 03:49
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Robert Low, 03:42
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 03:40
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Han de Bruijn, 03:37
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 03:37
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 03:35
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 03:21
- Re: Is math a real science?, Proginoskes, 03:19
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 03:13
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, Patrick Hamlyn, 03:12
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, David Kastrup, 03:08
- Re: 3D image stitch problem, Simon Plantinga, 03:03
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Bilge, 03:00
- Re: Need help on differential equation and optimization problem, hmobahi, 02:58
- How to transform the full model equation????, wartki, 02:55
- Re: Is math a real science?, Rusty, 02:45
- Re: Is math a real science?, Timo Salmi, 02:12
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, guenter, 02:07
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 02:01
- Re: Is math a real science?, Igor, 01:27
- Re: Need help on differential equation and optimization problem, Michael Jørgensen, 01:22
- Need help on differential equation and optimization problem, hmobahi, 00:45
- Re: Is math a real science?, fishfry, 00:24
- Re: Is math a real science?, Arturo Magidin, 00:00
September 13, 2005
- Re: Is math a real science?, markdemers15, 23:57
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), stephen, 23:46
- Re: Is math a real science?, Virgil, 23:41
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), Dave Seaman, 23:32
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), Ulrich Sondermann, 23:27
- Is math a real science?, Mathematics Lover, 23:06
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), Dik T. Winter, 22:41
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), stephen, 22:37
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), Mh, 22:26
- Re: Questions related to strengthening Bertrand's postulate., Nameless, 22:23
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Gerry Myerson, 22:21
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:00
- Re: The Problem with Probability Theory, Peter Webb, 22:00
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Androcles, 21:57
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:56
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:47
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:33
- Re: How to prove $|x(s)+y(s)|^p \leqq 2^p(|x(s)|^p+|y(s)|^p)$?, Robert Israel, 21:24
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, markwh04, 21:21
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:20
- Re: bilinear forms, computer, 21:20
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:17
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Virgil, 21:14
- Re: Positive Homogeneity, Robert Israel, 21:08
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), Jim Spriggs, 21:08
- Re: Density of irrationally determined roots of unity., Robert Israel, 21:04
- Re: Mega M&Ms in a jar, gcotterl, 21:00
- TOmatic limits, Randy Poe, 20:44
- Re: Infinite Dedekind-Finite Set, Dik T. Winter, 20:43
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), shepherdmoon, 20:38
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Richard Tobin, 20:37
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), shepherdmoon, 20:35
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), MoeBlee, 20:25
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 20:25
- Re: A few more questions, Jim Spriggs, 20:12
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:11
- Re: 0.999... = 1? (I know, a beaten dead horse), shepherdmoon, 20:11
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 20:10
- Re: Linear Algebra, Bill Dubuque, 20:08
- Re: Continued Fractions With Square Numerators, Dan, 20:08
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 20:07
- Androcles the cubologist, russell, 20:04
- Re: Why sci.math?, Dik T. Winter, 20:02
- Re: Why sci.math?, Dik T. Winter, 19:59
- Re: A few more questions, Jim Spriggs, 19:56
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dik T. Winter, 19:47
- Re: How many games of chess are there?, Gerry Myerson, 19:45
- How to prove $|x(s)+y(s)|^p \leqq 2^p(|x(s)|^p+|y(s)|^p)$?, mrz2003, 19:42
- Re: sum of sinc(k)?, Robert Israel, 19:40
- Re: A few more questions, Arturo Magidin, 19:38
- Re: A few more questions, Eric, 19:35
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 19:35
- Re: Variance, TCL, 19:23
- Re: A few more questions, Jim Spriggs, 19:18
- Re: A few more questions, Eric, 19:17
- Re: A few more questions, Jim Spriggs, 19:14
- Re: LaTeX question, dwwdkddb, 19:04
- Re: A few more questions, James Waldby, 19:04
- Re: A few more questions, Randy Poe, 19:01
- Re: A few more questions, Eric, 18:48
- Re: Update: Sudoku-x solver, samy, 18:44
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Androcles, 18:31
- Re: LaTeX question, Proginoskes, 18:30
- Re: A few more questions, Jim Spriggs, 18:27
- Re: A few more questions, Randy Poe, 18:23
- use math to realize that this will make you MONEY, mannajez, 18:20
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Richard Tobin, 18:19
- Re: A few more questions, Jim Spriggs, 18:16
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Randy Poe, 18:06
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 18:01
- Re: Generating Large Non-Singluar Matrices, Bendigi, 18:00
- generalization of Wilson theorem, m-man, 17:52
- Re: Mega M&Ms in a jar, Randy Poe, 17:52
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 17:50
- Re: LaTeX question, kwit moshi, 17:46
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 17:45
- Re: Mega M&Ms in a jar, gcotterl, 17:43
- Re: Generating Large Non-Singluar Matrices, Michael Hennebry, 17:43
- Re: Maximal compact subgroups of GL(n;R) help please, James, 17:43
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 17:42
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:40
- Re: LaTeX question, dwwdkddb, 17:35
- Re: correction for " Help :unfamiliar cubic ", m-man, 17:34
- Re: LaTeX question, , 17:34
- Re: correction for " Help :unfamiliar cubic ", m-man, 17:33
- Positive Homogeneity, kwit moshi, 17:32
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 17:24
- A few more questions, Eric, 17:23
- Proof for reals requires proof for integers first?, William McWorter, 17:21
- Re: Why sci.math?, David Kastrup, 17:19
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:13
- Density of irrationally determined roots of unity., mathman, 17:11
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 17:04
- Re: Jordan measure, Maury Barbato, 17:04
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 17:01
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:55
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Lee Rudolph, 16:53
- Re: Please help: I need to create a midi file using C language and "truncated fourier series", Mohan Pawar, 16:50
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:49
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:46
- Re: Mega M&Ms in a jar, gcotterl, 16:44
- Re: Variance, Herman Rubin, 16:44
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:42
- Re: Cantor Set, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:35
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, David R Tribble, 16:35
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 16:32
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:28
- Re: Questions related to strengthening Bertrand's postulate., Keith A. Lewis, 16:27
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:27
- Re: Please help: I need to create a midi file using C language and "truncated fourier series", Proginoskes, 16:27
- Re: LaTeX question, Proginoskes, 16:25
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 16:25
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:23
- Re: Derivative of functionals with respect to functions (?), Ronald Bruck, 16:23
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:20
- Re: sum of sinc(k)?, lucy, 16:19
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:19
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Ronald Bruck, 16:18
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 16:18
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:15
- Re: Questions related to strengthening Bertrand's postulate., Jim Spriggs, 16:14
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 16:13
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:13
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 16:12
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Jim Spriggs, 16:10
- Re: Mega M&Ms in a jar, Randy Poe, 16:10
- Re: Why sci.math?, David R Tribble, 16:08
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 16:07
- Re: convergence of sequences, Ronald Bruck, 16:00
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 16:00
- Re: Let's talk about continuity, Ronald Bruck, 15:54
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 15:53
- Re: average size of the antichain, quasi, 15:52
- Questions related to strengthening Bertrand's postulate., Jim Spriggs, 15:51
- Re: The Problem with Probability Theory, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:47
- Mega M&Ms in a jar, gcotterl, 15:43
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:41
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:33
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 15:33
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 15:30
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:23
- Re: Math is torture !, Herman Rubin, 15:20
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 15:16
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:09
- sum of sinc(k)?, lucy, 15:06
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 15:05
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, lucy, 15:01
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:00
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, lucy, 14:58
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:44
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Virgil, 14:41
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:39
- Re: Variance, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:36
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 14:34
- Re: The Problem with Probability Theory, Puppet_Sock, 14:33
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Virgil, 14:32
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 14:30
- Re: Variance of expected number of rolls, Randy Poe, 14:25
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Virgil, 14:24
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 14:20
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 14:17
- stochastic processes help, Carl R., 14:16
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 14:14
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, lucy, 14:12
- Re: Let's talk about continuity, Keith A. Lewis, 14:11
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:59
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 13:58
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 13:56
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 13:55
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 13:52
- Re: Differential Equations, Robert Israel, 13:50
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:50
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:48
- Re: proof of the infinitude of twin primes, and 4-unit primes and 6-unit primes etc etc Re: email-- prime number pattern, a_plutonium, 13:45
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:44
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:43
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:42
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:37
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 13:36
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:35
- Re: Continued Fractions With Square Numerators, Nathan, 13:28
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:26
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:23
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:22
- Re: The Problem with Probability Theory, Orion, 13:21
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 13:16
- Re: Variance of expected number of rolls, TCL, 13:09
- Re: infinity, Torkel Franzen, 12:59
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:40
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jim Spriggs, 12:34
- Re: Coding Theory Question, I think, Rusty, 12:33
- Re: Empiricism and the Assumption of Truth, Kees, 12:30
- Re: Math is torture !, Jim Spriggs, 12:29
- Re: Infinite Dedekind-Finite Set, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:19
- Re: Variance of expected number of rolls, Randy Poe, 12:15
- Re: 3D image stitch problem, Keith A. Lewis, 12:07
- Re: infinity, Jiri Lebl, 12:04
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:02
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 12:00
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, James Dolan, 11:59
- Variance, TCL, 11:56
- Re: Why sci.math?, Dave Seaman, 11:55
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Tom Roberts, 11:50
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 11:48
- Re: Continued Fractions With Square Numerators, Dan, 11:47
- Re: infinity, Jiri Lebl, 11:42
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, stephen, 11:39
- Re: Generating Large Non-Singluar Matrices, Robert Israel, 11:33
- Re: Why sci.math?, Wayne Brown, 11:32
- Re: Why sci.math?, Wayne Brown, 11:32
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Randy Poe, 11:25
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Lee Rudolph, 11:25
- Re: Maximal compact subgroups of GL(n;R) help please, Robert Israel, 11:24
- Re: I have one question!, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 11:23
- Re: A few more GRE questions, James Waldby, 11:14
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 11:13
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 11:13
- Re: Rotating higher order tensors, Robert Low, 11:11
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Tom Roberts, 11:07
- Re: problem about how to show open sets in R^2, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 11:02
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Randy Poe, 11:01
- Re: The Problem with Probability Theory, Ian Parker, 10:58
- Re: Rotating higher order tensors, Sarah Mang, 10:54
- Re: Let's talk about continuity, Robert Low, 10:54
- Re: Math is torture !, David McAnally, 10:52
- Re: convergence of sequences, G.E. Ivey, 10:46
- Infinite Dedekind-Finite Set, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:45
- Re: Let's talk about continuity, G.E. Ivey, 10:41
- Infinite Dedekind-Finite Set, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:41
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, stephen, 10:34
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 10:32
- Gyroscope and Elliptic Integrals?, John Schutkeker, 10:25
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, David Kastrup, 10:17
- Re: Math is torture !, mathedman, 10:15
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 10:15
- Re: The Problem with Probability Theory, Mh, 10:11
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:09
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Gregory L. Hansen, 10:07
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:03
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 09:52
- Re: Let's talk about continuity, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 09:50
- Re: Hyperspherical Volume Element, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 09:43
- Re: Please help: I need to create a midi file using C language and "truncated fourier series", David C . Ullrich, 09:41
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Schoenfeld, 09:31
- Re: convergence of sequences, David C . Ullrich, 09:29
- Re: Jordan measure, David C . Ullrich, 09:25
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 09:23
- Re: The Problem with Probability Theory, Evgenij Barsukov, 09:23
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Russell . Martin, 09:20
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 09:20
- Re: GRE math question, Randy Poe, 09:13
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, David C . Ullrich, 09:11
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 09:06
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, David C . Ullrich, 09:06
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, john_ramsden, 09:05
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Robert Low, 09:02
- A relation between l*-stability and differentiability, Dusan, 09:02
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 08:58
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, David C . Ullrich, 08:50
- Re: A few more GRE questions, Arturo Magidin, 08:46
- Re: The Problem with Probability Theory, A N Niel, 08:44
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, john_ramsden, 08:44
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:39
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Bilge, 08:31
- Re: Coding Theory Question, I think, Jyrki Lahtonen, 08:29
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Bilge, 08:25
- Re: Maximal compact subgroups of GL(n;R) help please, Per Vognsen, 08:16
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Bilge, 08:06
- Re: Simple set theory Qn., Ulysse Keller, 08:05
- Re: Differential Equations, Ulysse Keller, 08:05
- Please help: I need to create a midi file using C language and "truncated fourier series", david, 08:00
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 07:58
- Re: Maximal compact subgroups of GL(n;R) help please, James, 07:56
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dik T. Winter, 07:56
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, David Kastrup, 07:47
- Re: Why sci.math?, Dik T. Winter, 07:42
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 07:36
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:33
- Re: immersion, Lee Rudolph, 07:29
- Re: Coding Theory Question, I think, Thinus Pollard, 07:15
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Han de Bruijn, 07:02
- Re: what makes it true?, Aatu Koskensilta, 07:00
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 06:57
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, David Kastrup, 06:51
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 06:50
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 06:39
- Re: GRE math question, Russell, 06:33
- Re: LaTeX question, José Carlos Santos, 06:17
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dik T. Winter, 06:16
- Re: copyright for sudokus ?, Mike Williams, 06:09
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Han de Bruijn, 05:57
- LaTeX question, dwwdkddb, 05:57
- immersion, Simeon Stefanov, 05:51
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 05:51
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, john_ramsden, 05:41
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Proginoskes, 05:25
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Han de Bruijn, 05:23
- copyright for sudokus ?, guenter, 05:19
- Re: 3D image stitch problem, robert . oo . watson, 05:08
- Re: Let's talk about continuity, Gerry Myerson, 05:02
- Re: GRE math question, Russell, 04:53
- Re: Groups, , 04:47
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Han de Bruijn, 04:23
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 04:23
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 04:19
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 04:07
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 04:02
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, W. Dale Hall, 04:01
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, W. Dale Hall, 03:55
- Re: GRE math question, William Elliot, 03:51
- Re: Coding Theory Question, I think, William Elliot, 03:50
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Virgil, 03:50
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 03:41
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, W. Dale Hall, 03:40
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 03:39
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 03:38
- Simple set theory Qn., Ron Jones, 03:36
- Re: Let's talk about continuity, William Elliot, 03:36
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, mzafrullah, 03:28
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 03:23
- Re: The Problem with Probability Theory, Stephen Harris, 03:22
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 03:17
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 03:16
- Re: The Problem with Probability Theory, Stephen Harris, 03:15
- Re: sit back- let me write your research paper for you, Ralphy, 03:05
- How many games of chess are there?, Ray Johnstone, 03:00
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:56
- Coding Theory Question, I think, Thinus Pollard, 02:53
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, mzafrullah, 02:50
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:49
- Let's talk about continuity, news1.sympatico.ca, 02:43
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:37
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:36
- Re: Math is torture !, Proginoskes, 02:31
- Re: Continued Fractions With Square Numerators, Proginoskes, 02:28
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 02:24
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:22
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:20
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:15
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:13
- GRE math question, Eric, 02:12
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:11
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:07
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:04
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 02:00
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:56
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:43
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:38
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 01:35
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:28
- Re: A few more GRE questions, James Waldby, 01:20
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:18
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:13
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:10
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:03
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 01:01
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, mzafrullah, 00:59
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 00:57
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Schoenfeld, 00:51
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:49
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:42
- Theory for reccurent modeling of dynamic systems?, gangxu_csu, 00:42
- Re: A few more GRE questions, Gabriel Maybrun, 00:40
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Schoenfeld, 00:36
- Re: A geometry model, Gerry Myerson, 00:23
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Richard Ulrich, 00:17
- Re: Generating Large Non-Singluar Matrices, Gerry Myerson, 00:16
September 12, 2005
- Re: Generating Large Non-Singluar Matrices, Bendigi, 23:52
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 23:39
- The Problem with Probability Theory, msadkins04, 23:25
- Re: Generating Large Non-Singluar Matrices, Robert Israel, 23:22
- Re: infinity, stephen, 23:13
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, msadkins04, 23:13
- Re: average size of the antichain, Proginoskes, 22:57
- Re: Math is torture !, Gerry Myerson, 22:53
- Re: average size of the antichain, Proginoskes, 22:37
- Re: Maximal compact subgroups of GL(n;R) help please, Robert Israel, 22:23
- Re: average size of the antichain, Robert Israel, 22:17
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:17
- Re: Continued Fractions With Square Numerators, Randall, 22:16
- Re: Math is torture !, Devan L, 22:13
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:11
- Re: Maximal compact subgroups of GL(n;R) help please, James, 22:11
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, ArtflDodgr, 22:07
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:07
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 22:01
- Re: Math, William Elliot, 21:58
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:57
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 21:53
- Re: Math is torture !, Proginoskes, 21:52
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 21:51
- Re: A few more GRE questions, Jim Spriggs, 21:47
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:42
- Re: proof that cantor set is nowhere dense, Russell, 21:40
- Re: Maximal compact subgroups of GL(n;R) help please, Robert Israel, 21:33
- Re: Math is torture !, Jim Spriggs, 21:28
- Derivative of functionals with respect to functions (?), Hong Sup Lee, 21:21
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:17
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:07
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:57
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jim Spriggs, 20:55
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jim Spriggs, 20:53
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:52
- Re: A few more GRE questions, N. Silver, 20:48
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:47
- Re: Hyperspherical Volume Element, Robert Israel, 20:47
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:34
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 20:19
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Ioannis, 20:15
- Math is torture !, Riley Corninget, 20:15
- Re: Why sci.math?, David Kastrup, 20:04
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:58
- Re: Reverse thinking??? How to sum a series using Fourier Series method?, lucy, 19:55
- Re: Why sci.math?, Dik T. Winter, 19:48
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:26
- Re: Continued Fractions With Square Numerators, Nathan, 19:23
- Re: infinity, stephen, 19:16
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 19:15
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 19:09
- Re: average size of the antichain, Proginoskes, 19:01
- Re: volume under the surface, Proginoskes, 19:01
- Re: Continued Fractions With Square Numerators, Proginoskes, 19:01
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Reef Fish, 18:57
- Re: Linear Algebra, Gerry Myerson, 18:54
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Proginoskes, 18:53
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:43
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 18:42
- Re: Bert is (empirically) not evil, Richard Carr, 18:40
- Re: volume under the surface, Robert Israel, 18:40
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 18:40
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:36
- Maximal compact subgroups of GL(n;R) help please, James, 18:35
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 18:34
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:25
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 18:23
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:22
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 18:20
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:20
- Free XBox360 - 2 weeks left!! (Conga Line available for people having trouble getting referals), Bob, 18:14
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:07
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 18:07
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 18:07
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Bob Casanova, 18:05
- Hyperspherical Volume Element, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 18:05
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Narasimham, 18:03
- Re: A few more GRE questions, Arturo Magidin, 18:02
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Jonathan Hoyle, 18:02
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:56
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:56
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:54
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 17:51
- Re: infinity, stephen, 17:49
- A few more GRE questions, Eric, 17:49
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 17:48
- Bert is (empirically) not evil, Richard Carr, 17:47
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:46
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 17:46
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:42
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dik T. Winter, 17:42
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:42
- linear system stability, autogoor, 17:41
- Re: convergence of sequences, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 17:38
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 17:38
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 17:32
- Convexity, alexandru . lupas, 17:30
- Re: infinity, stephen, 17:28
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, ArtflDodgr, 17:28
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 17:26
- Re: Math, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 17:19
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 17:17
- Re: GRE math question, Arturo Magidin, 17:08
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:01
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 17:00
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 17:00
- Re: Math, odin, 16:56
- Re: GRE math question, Randy Poe, 16:53
- Re: proofs of fundamental lemmas in variational calculus, Christos Dimitrakakis, 16:51
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:43
- Re: GRE math question, Kees, 16:41
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:41
- GRE math question, Eric, 16:32
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 16:30
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:30
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 16:29
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:29
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Anon., 16:28
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Tom Roberts, 16:26
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Kees, 16:24
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:24
- Re: My little challenge in finding root of an equation, Robert Israel, 16:22
- Re: Please explain this (stochastic process ), Michael Semischenko, 16:20
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 16:19
- Math, Michael Semischenko, 16:18
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 16:16
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:14
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 16:14
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 16:10
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:07
- Re: proofs of fundamental lemmas in variational calculus, Robert Low, 16:06
- Re: proofs of fundamental lemmas in variational calculus, Ed Hook, 16:06
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:06
- Re: infinity, stephen, 16:02
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:01
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:00
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:59
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 15:59
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:59
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:58
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:56
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:56
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 15:55
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:55
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 15:54
- Re: infinity, Martin Shobe, 15:54
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, stephen, 15:53
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 15:52
- proofs of fundamental lemmas in variational calculus, Christos Dimitrakakis, 15:50
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 15:49
- Re: infinity, Martin Shobe, 15:48
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 15:48
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:48
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, msadkins04, 15:48
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:48
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 15:48
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:45
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:44
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 15:42
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:41
- Re: Groups, Arturo Magidin, 15:40
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 15:39
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:39
- Re: My little challenge in finding root of an equation, Peter L. Montgomery, 15:35
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Herman Rubin, 15:35
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 15:35
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:34
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:32
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:29
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 15:28
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:27
- Re: Topology: closed, continuous images, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:27
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:26
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 15:26
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 15:24
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:23
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 15:23
- Re: Why sci.math?, Russell, 15:23
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 15:22
- Re: average size of the antichain, quasi, 15:21
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, msadkins04, 15:19
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:19
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:18
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), brian a m stuckless, 15:17
- Re: convergence of sequences, woodland, 15:17
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 15:15
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 15:14
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 15:13
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 15:08
- Re: Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad, 15:06
- Re: Continued Fractions With Square Numerators, Nathan, 15:05
- Re: Linear Algebra, nonton, 15:02
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 15:02
- Re: infinity, stephen, 15:01
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:01
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:59
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 14:58
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, stephen, 14:58
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, msadkins04, 14:57
- Re: convergence of sequences, Ronald Bruck, 14:57
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 14:57
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 14:56
- Re: Groups, Julien Santini, 14:56
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:53
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:53
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:52
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:52
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 14:51
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:50
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 14:50
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:49
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:42
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:41
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 14:41
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 14:40
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 14:39
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 14:37
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:36
- Re: Linear Algebra, Paul Sperry, 14:33
- convergence of sequences, woodland, 14:32
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 14:31
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Gregory L. Hansen, 14:26
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 14:26
- A geometry model, TCL, 14:25
- Re: Help with stochastic differential needed, Guran, 14:24
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, msadkins04, 14:23
- Re: Linear Algebra, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:21
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:20
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 14:19
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:19
- Re: proof of the infinitude of twin primes, and 4-unit primes and 6-unit primes etc etc Re: email-- prime number pattern, a_plutonium, 14:19
- Please explain this (stochastic process ), Carl R., 14:18
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:18
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:11
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 14:10
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 14:07
- Re: Linear Algebra, Arturo Magidin, 14:06
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Gregory L. Hansen, 14:04
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:04
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 14:04
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:03
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 14:00
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:56
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:53
- Re: infinity, stephen, 13:50
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, stephen, 13:47
- Linear Algebra, nonton, 13:45
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 13:44
- Jordan measure, Maury Barbato, 13:39
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:28
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:26
- Re: infinity, stephen, 13:24
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 13:20
- Re: infinity, stephen, 13:19
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 13:18
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 13:14
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:12
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:09
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 13:07
- Continued Fractions With Square Numerators, Leroy Quet, 13:05
- Help with stochastic differential needed, Guran, 13:04
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:04
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:03
- Re: Reverse thinking??? How to sum a series using Fourier Series method?, Robert Israel, 12:58
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 12:56
- Dividing Numerator or Denomninator Of Harmonic Numbers, Leroy Quet, 12:51
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 12:48
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Robert Israel, 12:48
- Re: 3D image stitch problem, Keith A. Lewis, 12:45
- Limit Of Product Of Sums, Leroy Quet, 12:37
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, David R Tribble, 12:36
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:33
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Richard Tobin, 12:32
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Robert Low, 12:31
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, stephen, 12:30
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Robert Israel, 12:27
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, David R Tribble, 12:27
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 12:27
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, john_ramsden, 12:25
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 12:23
- Re: Diagonalization of Quadratic Forms in R^3 -, JEMebius, 12:20
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 12:18
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:18
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:17
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:14
- Re: Why sci.math?, David R Tribble, 12:06
- Re: infinity, Jiri Lebl, 12:05
- Re: Why sci.math?, David R Tribble, 12:02
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:01
- Re: Any one has an idea about (xD)^n Operator, alainverghote, 12:01
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 11:59
- Re: infinity, stephen, 11:54
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Jesse F. Hughes, 11:53
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, donstockbauer, 11:49
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, donstockbauer, 11:46
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, stephen, 11:43
- Re: Topology: closed, continuous images, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:41
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, stephen, 11:40
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 11:39
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 11:39
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 11:33
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:19
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 11:17
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:15
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 11:12
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 11:11
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:10
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 11:10
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:09
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 11:09
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 11:06
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:06
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Richard Tobin, 11:05
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 11:01
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:59
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 10:58
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 10:55
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:53
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 10:52
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Arturo Magidin, 10:52
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 10:49
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 10:49
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 10:48
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:45
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:43
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 10:40
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:38
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 10:35
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 10:35
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 10:35
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 10:31
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, David Kastrup, 10:30
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 10:26
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:26
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 10:21
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 10:18
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Robert Low, 10:17
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 10:16
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, john_ramsden, 10:14
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 10:12
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, David C . Ullrich, 10:09
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 10:07
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:04
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 10:01
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 09:56
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:56
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 09:50
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:49
- Re: Some Sodoku Questions., Richard Tobin, 09:48
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 09:47
- Re: connected subsets of R^2, Daniel Grubb, 09:47
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 09:45
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:43
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:42
- CalcSharp, Nik, 09:41
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dik T. Winter, 09:39
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 09:37
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:36
- multi-typed vector distance, news.onet.pl, 09:30
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:27
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:20
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:15
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:05
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Han de Bruijn, 09:04
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:03
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:03
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 08:57
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 08:55
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 08:55
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Han de Bruijn, 08:55
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 08:48
- Re: A typo in a statement demanding properties for a lattice to be a logic?, Peter van Emburg, 08:47
- Some Sodoku Questions., Robert J. Kolker, 08:43
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 08:34
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Robert Low, 08:28
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Han de Bruijn, 08:28
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 08:09
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, David Kastrup, 08:08
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 08:07
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Samuele, 08:05
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David Kastrup, 08:04
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Han de Bruijn, 07:52
- Re: Reverse thinking??? How to sum a series using Fourier Series method?, G. A. Edgar, 07:45
- Re: Why sci.math?, john_ramsden, 07:44
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, David Kastrup, 07:41
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Han de Bruijn, 07:39
- Re: Why sci.math?, David Kastrup, 07:38
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, G. A. Edgar, 07:33
- Re: Why sci.math?, G. A. Edgar, 07:25
- Diagonalization of Quadratic Forms in R^3, computer, 07:18
- Re: infinity, albstorz, 06:56
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dik T. Winter, 06:55
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, Dik T. Winter, 06:53
- Re: OT: Netiquette, David C . Ullrich, 06:50
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:49
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, David C . Ullrich, 06:48
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:47
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], David C . Ullrich, 06:45
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, David C . Ullrich, 06:33
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:29
- 3D image stitch problem, robert . oo . watson, 06:28
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 06:27
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Anghel, 06:20
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Lee Rudolph, 06:19
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:17
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 06:13
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Bilge, 06:11
- Re: proof of the infinitude of twin primes, and 4-unit primes and 6-unit primes etc etc Re: email-- prime number pattern, a_plutonium, 06:11
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Bilge, 06:08
- Re: Topology: closed, continuous images, William Elliot, 05:56
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 12, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 05:34
- Re: Recurrence for Squares and S_r Type Sequences, Andy Hone, 05:26
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Han de Bruijn, 05:17
- Re: Topology: closed, continuous images, William Elliot, 05:00
- Does it add up? - funny, JohnS, 04:54
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Han de Bruijn, 04:50
- Re: average size of the antichain, sasha mal, 04:43
- Re: average size of the antichain, sasha mal, 04:40
- Re: Cantor Set, José Carlos Santos, 04:35
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 04:31
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Robert Low, 04:12
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 04:03
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:00
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:58
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 03:57
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 03:55
- volume under the surface, John, 03:55
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:53
- Please check my solutions, Zinc Potterman, 03:38
- Re: Groups, Jyrki Lahtonen, 03:30
- Re: My little challenge in finding root of an equation, Robert Israel, 03:15
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Han de Bruijn, 03:14
- Re: Why sci.math?, Robert Israel, 03:11
- Re: Normal subgroups of S_n, Jyrki Lahtonen, 03:09
- Re: Steiner Systems, Jyrki Lahtonen, 02:58
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 02:47
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Gerry Myerson, 02:44
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Robert Israel, 02:41
- Re: A statement about polynomial time solvability, Proginoskes, 02:36
- Topology: closed, continuous images, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:34
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Proginoskes, 02:28
- Re: My little challenge in finding root of an equation, Virgil, 02:21
- Re: Why sci.math?, David Kastrup, 01:52
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:48
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:44
- Re: Why sci.math?, Narasimham, 01:44
- Re: A statement about polynomial time solvability, SASWATA SHANNIGRAHI, 01:44
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, stephen, 01:37
- Re: Taylor an Fourier, David Kastrup, 01:34
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:33
- Re: A statement about polynomial time solvability, SASWATA SHANNIGRAHI, 01:31
- Re: Taylor an Fourier, k wallace, 01:05
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:05
- Re: proof of the infinitude of twin primes, and 4-unit primes and 6-unit primes etc etc Re: email-- prime number pattern, a_plutonium, 01:02
- Re: Why sci.math?, Gerry Myerson, 00:58
- Re: proof of the infinitude of twin primes, and 4-unit primes and 6-unit primes etc etc Re: email-- prime number pattern, a_plutonium, 00:55
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Dave Rusin, 00:54
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Dave Rusin, 00:31
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Gregory L. Hansen, 00:26
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 00:08
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Dave Rusin, 00:08
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, stephen, 00:00
September 11, 2005
- Re: proof of the infinitude of twin primes, and 4-unit primes and 6-unit primes etc etc Re: email-- prime number pattern, a_plutonium, 23:58
- Re: prove that the sequence (-1)^n is divergent, quasi, 23:52
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Schoenfeld, 23:50
- Re: Empty core, Simon Crase, 23:50
- Re: prove that the sequence (-1)^n is divergent, quasi, 23:49
- Re: Coding Theory and Probability Question, Mh, 23:46
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, quasi, 23:44
- Re: Ring of C_0(X), Trav, 23:42
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Dave Rusin, 23:39
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 23:39
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Bill Dubuque, 23:34
- Re: Expected value, TCL, 23:05
- Re: prove that the sequence (-1)^n is divergent, Robert J. Kolker, 22:41
- Re: Groups, Arturo Magidin, 22:21
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 22:08
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Jonathan Hoyle, 22:00
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Kadaitcha Man, 22:00
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Herman Rubin, 21:42
- Re: odd mortgage question, jhp_news_only, 21:40
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 21:38
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 21:34
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 21:27
- Re: prove that the sequence (-1)^n is divergent, Dik T. Winter, 20:52
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Jim Spriggs, 20:43
- Re: a question about sequences, quasi, 20:42
- Re: Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, Tron, 20:39
- prove that the sequence (-1)^n is divergent, woodland, 20:37
- Re: proof of the infinitude of twin primes, and 4-unit primes and 6-unit primes etc etc Re: email-- prime number pattern, quasi, 20:27
- Probability Theory Is Inconsistent, msadkins04, 20:12
- Re: OT: Netiquette, Karl M. Bunday, 20:06
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Gerry Myerson, 20:04
- Re: Any one has an idea about (xD)^n Operator, Proginoskes, 20:04
- Calculate Combinations of an Abbreviated Wheel, Paul Black, 20:03
- Calculate Combinations Covered in an Abbreviated Wheel, Paul Black, 20:01
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dik T. Winter, 19:59
- Re: OT: Netiquette, Jim Spriggs, 19:59
- Re: I have one question!, Proginoskes, 19:46
- Re: OT: Netiquette, Gerry Myerson, 19:44
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, T.H. Ray, 19:43
- Re: Any one has an idea about (xD)^n Operator, Gerry Myerson, 19:38
- Re: a question about sequences, Proginoskes, 19:35
- Re: OT: Netiquette, James Waldby, 19:34
- Re: Reverse thinking??? How to sum a series using Fourier Series method?, Gerry Myerson, 19:27
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Proginoskes, 19:27
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, Robert Israel, 19:21
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Proginoskes, 19:20
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Timothy Little, 19:20
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, T.H. Ray, 19:17
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, T.H. Ray, 19:13
- Re: Coding Theory and Probability Question, jeffconner50, 19:06
- Re: Solution to four-color problem, Proginoskes, 19:03
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, fernando revilla, 19:03
- Re: OT: Netiquette, Jim Spriggs, 18:53
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:50
- Re: My little challenge in finding root of an equation, Jim Burns, 18:44
- Re: I have one question!, Anghel, 18:30
- Re: My little challenge in finding root of an equation, john_ramsden, 18:28
- Re: I have one question!, Anghel, 18:24
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 18:24
- Re: OT: Netiquette, Tony, 18:17
- Re: Cantor Set, Dave Seaman, 18:13
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 18:10
- Re: a question about sequences, Rainer Rosenthal, 17:53
- Re: Cantor Set, mark12345, 17:49
- Re: a question about sequences, Arturo Magidin, 17:48
- Re: My little challenge in finding root of an equation, matt271829-news, 17:45
- Re: My little challenge in finding root of an equation, matt271829-news, 17:39
- Re: A typo in a statement demanding properties for a lattice to be a logic?, Ken Pledger, 17:38
- Re: My little challenge in finding root of an equation, James Waldby, 17:35
- Reverse thinking??? How to sum a series using Fourier Series method?, lucy, 17:27
- Re: odd mortgage question, Ken Pledger, 17:24
- Re: My little challenge in finding root of an equation, Robert Israel, 17:24
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Bilge, 17:21
- Re: OT: Netiquette, Jim Burns, 17:17
- Re: a question about sequences, Rainer Rosenthal, 17:15
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, lucy, 17:10
- Re: a question about sequences, José Carlos Santos, 17:08
- Re: Cantor Set, José Carlos Santos, 17:05
- Re: a question about sequences, Arturo Magidin, 17:05
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 17:03
- Re: Power Law Distribution, Daniel McLaury, 17:01
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, lucy, 17:01
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 16:55
- Re: Cantor Set, mark12345, 16:53
- Re: Cantor Set, Ed Hook, 16:52
- a question about sequences, woodland, 16:51
- Re: Ring of C_0(X), José Carlos Santos, 16:45
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 16:39
- Re: Cantor Set, José Carlos Santos, 16:39
- Power Law Distribution, George, 16:34
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, stephen, 16:33
- Re: Cantor Set, NotP, 16:32
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Bilge, 16:29
- Cantor Set, mark12345, 16:25
- Re: Ring of C_0(X), Lee Rudolph, 16:21
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 16:17
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 16:06
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, stephen, 16:00
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Rick Decker, 16:00
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Bilge, 15:59
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, David Kastrup, 15:51
- Re: question about wreath product, Arturo Magidin, 15:39
- My little challenge in finding root of an equation, m-man, 15:32
- Re: optimisation, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 15:18
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 15:18
- Ring of C_0(X), Trav, 15:17
- Re: OT: Netiquette, Ross A. Finlayson, 15:13
- Re: OT: Netiquette, David C . Ullrich, 15:09
- Re: OT: Netiquette, Jim Spriggs, 14:37
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Robert Israel, 14:24
- Re: OT: Netiquette, James Waldby, 14:23
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Robert Israel, 14:11
- Hull-White interest rate model under physical probability measure, attacksnygg, 13:59
- Re: proof of the infinitude of twin primes, and 4-unit primes and 6-unit primes etc etc Re: email-- prime number pattern, a_plutonium, 13:40
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, man_in_black529, 13:32
- Parastatistics, Jack Sarfatti, 13:16
- Re: even and odd permutations - popular presentation?-, , 13:10
- Re: even and odd permutations - popular presentation?, Virgil, 13:09
- proof of the infinitude of twin primes, and 4-unit primes and 6-unit primes etc etc Re: email-- prime number pattern, a_plutonium, 13:03
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Jim Burns, 12:57
- Re: "logic of the set" analyzer, fishfry, 12:53
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 12:44
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', Dan, 12:34
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:11
- Re: even and odd permutations - popular presentation?-, JEMebius, 11:55
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:52
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Jim Spriggs, 11:51
- Re: I have one question!, stephen, 11:41
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Jim Spriggs, 11:33
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, T.H. Ray, 11:32
- Re: Slaughter The Sacred Cow of Unitarity!, T.H. Ray, 11:27
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, jimp, 11:16
- Differential Equations, Maury Barbato, 11:14
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Mike, 11:04
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, T.H. Ray, 10:54
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, T.H. Ray, 10:52
- Re: Empty core, Jim Spriggs, 10:31
- Re: I have one question!, Jim Spriggs, 10:25
- Re: even and odd permutations - popular presentation?, Michael Blanc, 10:19
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, stephen, 10:14
- Re: Solution to four-color problem, Robert J. Kolker, 10:09
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Bilge, 09:57
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', The Qurqirish Dragon, 09:40
- even and odd permutations - popular presentation?, Nomen Nescio, 09:40
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 220), Igor Khavkine, 09:33
- Re: OT: Netiquette, Jim Spriggs, 09:29
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', Jim Spriggs, 09:26
- Re: I have one question!, Jim Spriggs, 09:19
- Re: infinity, Martin Shobe, 09:18
- question about discrete system in the plane, mahuratakanakura, 09:06
- Re: A typo in a statement demanding properties for a lattice to be a logic?, Peter van Emburg, 09:02
- Re: Solution to four-color problem, Sam Wormley, 08:57
- Re: Solution to four-color problem, Sam Wormley, 08:55
- Solution to four-color problem, hamid_v_ansari, 08:46
- Re: Empty core, quasi, 08:36
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Jesse F. Hughes, 08:36
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, David Kastrup, 08:29
- Re: OT: Netiquette, David C . Ullrich, 08:21
- Re: I have one question!, David C . Ullrich, 08:16
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 08:15
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, quasi, 08:13
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, quasi, 07:35
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, quasi, 07:11
- Re: optimisation, Randy Poe, 07:10
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, quasi, 06:57
- Re: Is this polynomial f(x) reducible over Q ?, Bill Dubuque, 06:49
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 06:34
- Re: optimisation, jib jib, 06:31
- Re: Is this polynomial f(x) reducible over Q ?, Bill Dubuque, 06:23
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 06:09
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, quasi, 06:01
- Re: Any one has an idea about (xD)^n Operator, alainverghote, 05:58
- Re: Empty core, Anghel, 05:57
- Re: optimisation, David Kastrup, 05:53
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, Anghel, 05:50
- Re: Is this polynomial f(x) reducible over Q ?, quasi, 05:44
- Re: I have one question!, Anghel, 05:39
- optimisation, jib jib, 05:38
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 05:35
- Empty core, Anghel, 05:18
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Kees, 05:13
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Robert Low, 04:43
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, a_plutonium, 04:32
- Re: Is this polynomial f(x) reducible over Q ?, quasi, 04:24
- "logic of the set" analyzer, Max, 04:17
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, a_plutonium, 04:05
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 03:24
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, a_plutonium, 03:19
- Re: Math.Annalen online?, Lee Rudolph, 03:14
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 02:49
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:40
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 02:09
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, David Kastrup, 02:03
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, lucy, 01:40
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Proginoskes, 01:33
- Re: Any one has an idea about (xD)^n Operator, Proginoskes, 01:25
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 01:22
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Kadaitcha Man, 01:21
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 01:16
- Re: correction for " Help :unfamiliar cubic ", N. Silver, 01:01
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 00:55
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Proginoskes, 00:53
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Nth Complexity, 00:51
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 00:42
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', Proginoskes, 00:39
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Kadaitcha Man, 00:25
- Re: Limits with absolute value, CheckOn, 00:20
- Any one has an idea about (xD)^n Operator, CheckOn, 00:15
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Proginoskes, 00:09
- Math.Annalen online?, Allan Adler, 00:08
September 10, 2005
- Re: A statement about polynomial time solvability, Proginoskes, 23:56
- Re: Why sci.math?, Marvin, 23:22
- Re: OT: Netiquette, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:08
- test, A Nony Mouse, 23:00
- Re: Coding Theory and Probability Question, NightsoilDalits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 22:53
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Robert J. Kolker, 22:51
- OT: Netiquette, Jim Spriggs, 22:50
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Jim Spriggs, 22:41
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', Jim Spriggs, 22:40
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Sean Holman, 22:22
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:20
- Re: Anyons, parastatistics, fractals TYPO correction, donstockbauer, 22:17
- Re: Help: unfamiliar cubic, john_ramsden, 22:01
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', The Ghost In The Machine, 22:00
- Re: correction for " Help :unfamiliar cubic ", Jim Spriggs, 21:52
- Re: Tutor wanted for occasional physics help, john_ramsden, 21:36
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Mike, 21:33
- Re: Tutor wanted for occasional physics help, Jim Spriggs, 21:31
- correction for " Help :unfamiliar cubic ", m-man, 21:23
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Jim Spriggs, 21:15
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 21:11
- Re: Limits with absolute value, Dave Seaman, 21:07
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Dik T. Winter, 20:42
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dik T. Winter, 20:29
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Jim Spriggs, 20:12
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 20:11
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 20:09
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Nth Complexity, 19:59
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, fishfry, 19:49
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, Rick Decker, 19:44
- Limits with absolute value, infinity, 19:42
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Arturo Magidin, 19:37
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 19:19
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 19:18
- Re: Why sci.math?, Timothy Little, 19:00
- Re: I have one question!-the answer is 42, JEMebius, 18:55
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 18:46
- Re: A typo in a statement demanding properties for a lattice to be a logic?, William Elliot, 18:42
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:40
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Jim Spriggs, 18:40
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 18:35
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 18:32
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Jim Spriggs, 18:31
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Androcles, 18:16
- Re: Infinity =/= Infinity, Jim Spriggs, 18:11
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Arturo Magidin, 18:10
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Daryl McCullough, 17:40
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:10
- Anyons, parastatistics, fractals TYPO correction, Jack Sarfatti, 17:03
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Androcles, 16:37
- Tutor wanted for occasional physics help, Zinc Potterman, 16:28
- Re: Infinite limit problem - Please critique my work, Carl Parkes, 16:27
- Gravity Hartle Problem 7 Check please, Zinc Potterman, 16:21
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 16:20
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 16:16
- Re: what makes it true?, cbrown, 16:07
- Infinity =/= Infinity, albstorz, 16:04
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 15:59
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dik T. Winter, 15:55
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dik T. Winter, 15:54
- test, Zinc Potterman, 15:54
- test, Zinc Potterman, 15:50
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 15:40
- Re: Is this polynomial f(x) reducible over Q ?, , 15:26
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Androcles, 15:18
- Mathnasium, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:17
- Re: Functions of complex variable with same absolute value, chris, 15:12
- Re: Is this polynomial f(x) reducible over Q ?, Ed Hook, 15:05
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Androcles, 15:01
- Re: I have one question!, quasi, 14:56
- Re: email-- prime number pattern, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:53
- Re: Is this polynomial f(x) reducible over Q ?, quasi, 14:40
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Robert Low, 14:28
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:21
- Re: Acta Mathematica Articles, Jim Spriggs, 14:20
- Re: I have one question!, Jim Spriggs, 14:18
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 14:12
- Re: average size of the antichain, quasi, 14:01
- Re: Could you check this?, quasi, 13:51
- Macro-quantum emergence of local space-time physics, Jack Sarfatti, 13:47
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Kees, 13:42
- Acta Mathematica Articles, pablosebviola@xxxxxxxxx, 13:42
- Re: question about wreath product, Jose Melo, 13:39
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Arturo Magidin, 13:36
- email-- prime number pattern, a_plutonium, 13:26
- Re: I have one question!, G.E. Ivey, 13:22
- Re: The Lebesgue Method of Traction for Penile Enlargement, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', Carl Parkes, 12:39
- Re: Why sci.math?, Richard Mathar, 12:23
- Re: I have one question!, Richard Mathar, 12:15
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:15
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Robert J. Kolker, 12:14
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Dik T. Winter, 12:12
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, David Kastrup, 12:10
- Re: Functions of complex variable with same absolute value, Kira Yamato, 12:07
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 12:04
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 12:03
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 12:00
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, The Ghost In The Machine, 12:00
- Re: Normal subgroups of S_n, Timothy Murphy, 11:55
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, Dik T. Winter, 11:45
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:44
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Androcles, 11:42
- Re: Complex irred. Representations of T^k, Timothy Murphy, 11:41
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:41
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, john_ramsden, 11:41
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dik T. Winter, 11:38
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 11:32
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dik T. Winter, 11:29
- Re: The Lebesgue Method of Traction for Penile Enlargement, john_ramsden, 11:16
- Re: Why sci.math?, David Kastrup, 11:16
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 11:14
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 11:13
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 11:13
- I have one question!, Anghel, 11:12
- Re: Why sci.math?, Dik T. Winter, 11:09
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 11:08
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 11:01
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 11:01
- Re: Complex irred. Representations of T^k, David C . Ullrich, 10:54
- Re: Is this polynomial f(x) reducible over Q ?, Timothy Murphy, 10:52
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Daryl McCullough, 10:38
- Re: elementary proof of extreme value theorem, Kees, 10:37
- Re: seeking simple integer number 'games', mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:30
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, David C . Ullrich, 10:29
- Re: what makes it true?, David C . Ullrich, 10:20
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 10:10
- Re: Limit of sin(x)/x, Jim Spriggs, 10:09
- Re: Limit of sin(x)/x, Jim Spriggs, 10:06
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 10:06
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 10:03
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Robert Low, 10:01
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:56
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Androcles, 09:53
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:48
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 09:47
- Functions of complex variable with same absolute value, chris, 09:41
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Wim Benthem, 09:34
- Re: I am curious about old algorithms, --CELKO--, 09:33
- Re: New and faster algorithm for multiplication, Phil Carmody, 09:23
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, jmfbahciv, 09:18
- Re: graph theory, Alex Hunsley, 09:16
- seeking simple integer number 'games', Alex Hunsley, 09:15
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 09:05
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, The Ghost In The Machine, 09:00
- Re: what makes it true?, Daryl McCullough, 08:54
- Re: Infinite limit problem - Please critique my work, Ron Sperber, 08:46
- Re: elementary proof of extreme value theorem, Ron Sperber, 08:37
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 08:35
- Re: Complex irred. Representations of T^k, James, 08:30
- Fraction field of k[x,y]/(x^2-y^3), James, 08:27
- The Lebesgue Method of Traction for Penile Enlargement, h . manring, 08:22
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 08:12
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 08:11
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 08:06
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, The Ghost In The Machine, 08:00
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Androcles, 07:51
- Re: Why sci.math?, David Ames, 07:43
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, brian a m stuckless, 07:34
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 07:31
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 07:30
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 07:21
- No more penis enlarge ripoffs!, "Gysi", 07:19
- Re: Is this polynomial f(x) reducible over Q ?, , 06:53
- Re: connected subsets of R^2, William Elliot, 06:46
- Is this polynomial f(x) reducible over Q ?, Baek . Sanghoon, 06:32
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dirk Van de moortel, 06:22
- A typo in a statement demanding properties for a lattice to be a logic?, Peter van Emburg, 06:18
- Un système de conjugaison mieux que le Bescherelle, lesixpourcentfr, 05:53
- Re: A statement about polynomial time solvability, SASWATA SHANNIGRAHI, 05:39
- elementary proof of extreme value theorem, Kees, 05:32
- Re: problem about how to show open sets in R^2, William Elliot, 05:18
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 05:14
- Re: problem about how to show open sets in R^2, Russell, 04:45
- Re: referencesfor these coefficients, Gottfried Helms, 04:31
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Kees, 04:16
- Re: Could you check this?, never, 04:11
- Re: Could you check this?, David Kastrup, 04:07
- Re: average size of the antichain, quasi, 04:07
- Could you check this?, Alex, 03:57
- Re: Normal subgroups of S_n, Jannick Asmus, 03:56
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 03:50
- problem about how to show open sets in R^2, Jonas, 03:45
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Mathematics Lover, 03:21
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Eric Bohlman, 03:06
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 03:05
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:04
- Re: Coding Theory and Probability Question, jeffconner50, 03:04
- Re: average size of the antichain, Proginoskes, 03:03
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 03:03
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, David Kastrup, 03:01
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 02:59
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Schoenfeld, 02:57
- Re: Alternative to probability, quasi, 02:57
- Re: Why sci.math?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:44
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jesse F. Hughes, 02:42
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Proginoskes, 02:40
- Re: Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, Proginoskes, 02:35
- Re: Alternative to probability, Herman Jurjus, 02:24
- Re: Complex irred. Representations of T^k, José Carlos Santos, 02:15
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 02:13
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:22
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Martin Shobe, 01:19
- Integrating x^k*sin(a*x) and x^k*cos(a*x)?, lucy, 01:01
- Re: what makes it true?, Ron Peterson, 00:48
- Infinity, Virgil, 00:16
September 09, 2005
- Re: infinity, Martin Shobe, 23:56
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Virgil, 23:46
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 23:43
- Re: Infinity, Virgil, 23:41
- Re: Why sci.math?, Russell, 23:36
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 23:33
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 23:26
- Re: Why sci.math?, stephen, 23:01
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 22:52
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 22:49
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 22:47
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 22:45
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 22:43
- Managing Disasters??? Possible or Pie in the Sky?? C-Span, Zim Olson, 22:25
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Russell, 21:48
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dr. Flonkenstein, 21:46
- Re: Why sci.math?, Russell, 21:31
- Re: what makes it true?, Dik T. Winter, 21:27
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Nth Complexity, 21:20
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Nth Complexity, 21:18
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Arturo Magidin, 21:11
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Dr. Flonkenstein, 21:11
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Arturo Magidin, 21:10
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:05
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Uncle Al, 21:02
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 20:57
- Re: infinity, Jim Hill, 20:56
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 20:51
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Dik T. Winter, 20:51
- Re: Why sci.math?, Lee Rudolph, 20:50
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:44
- Re: Infinite limit problem - Please critique my work, infinity, 20:38
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:35
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 20:30
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Kadaitcha Man, 20:26
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 20:25
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., bill, 20:06
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 20:00
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Proginoskes, 20:00
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Nth Complexity, 19:58
- Re: A statement about polynomial time solvability, Proginoskes, 19:55
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Proginoskes, 19:51
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), the softrat, 19:48
- Re: NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, odin, 19:47
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Proginoskes, 19:46
- Re: what makes it true?, Ron Peterson, 19:45
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), the softrat, 19:45
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], G. A. Edgar, 19:45
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Proginoskes, 19:44
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 19:37
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 19:33
- Re: sine inverse of something, Proginoskes, 19:31
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:27
- Re: Limit of sin(x)/x, bill, 19:26
- Re: Limit of sin(x)/x, Proginoskes, 19:26
- Re: Why sci.math?, David Ames, 19:24
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:23
- Re: i need ur help, Proginoskes, 19:22
- Re: Why sci.math?, fishfry, 19:22
- Re: Why sci.math?, David R Tribble, 19:17
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 19:15
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:15
- Re: referencesfor these coefficients, Gottfried Helms, 19:11
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 19:11
- Complex irred. Representations of T^k, James, 19:06
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:06
- NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS, Nth Complexity, 19:05
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 19:01
- Re: Why sci.math?, David R Tribble, 18:59
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:52
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:44
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 18:42
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:39
- Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Kees, 18:37
- Re: Expected value, TCL, 18:35
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Kees, 18:34
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:30
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], NotP, 18:25
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:25
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:23
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 18:23
- Re: Herc's Juggler Problem - Not bad at all, john_ramsden, 18:17
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:14
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 18:13
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Kees, 18:11
- Re: Coding Theory and Probability Question, NightsoilDalits@RyugyongHotel, 18:06
- Re: infinity, stephen, 18:05
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 18:00
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:58
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Arturo Magidin, 17:57
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 17:55
- Re: Alternative to probability, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:55
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 17:51
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:49
- Re: find a third of a line?, Randy Poe, 17:49
- Coding Theory and Probability Question, jeffconner50, 17:49
- Re: find a third of a line?, leshanster, 17:46
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 17:42
- Re: find a third of a line?, Randy Poe, 17:33
- Re: find a third of a line?, Randy Poe, 17:27
- Re: Baseball field, kchoose2, 17:26
- Re: infinity, stephen, 17:21
- Re: Prime Generator!!!!!, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:21
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Kees, 17:20
- Re: infinity, stephen, 17:17
- Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Ittay Weiss, 17:15
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:15
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 17:12
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 17:11
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jim Spriggs, 17:10
- Re: infinity, stephen, 17:09
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 17:08
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 17:07
- Re: find a third of a line?, leshanster, 17:07
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 17:03
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 17:00
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:58
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 16:58
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:57
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:55
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 16:55
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:54
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:53
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:50
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:50
- Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Ittay Weiss, 16:49
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:49
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:48
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 16:47
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:44
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:41
- Re: Why sci.math?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:40
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 16:36
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:35
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:33
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:28
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 16:28
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:27
- Re: Prime Generator!!!!!, Gabriel Vizena, 16:23
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 16:23
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:23
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:20
- Re: what makes it true?, , 16:18
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:16
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:14
- Re: Normal subgroups of S_n, , 16:14
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:12
- Re: infinity, stephen, 16:10
- Re: Prime Generator!!!!!, Dave, 16:09
- Re: Why sci.math?, Robert Israel, 16:08
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 16:07
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:07
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 16:04
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 16:02
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 16:02
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 15:56
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 15:55
- Re: Why sci.math?, Androcles, 15:51
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 15:48
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:47
- Re: infinity, stephen, 15:46
- Re: Another Coxeter group question, Jim Heckman, 15:45
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:42
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:38
- Re: Why sci.math?, William Hughes, 15:36
- Re: odd mortgage question, Pubkeybreaker, 15:30
- Re: infinity, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:21
- Re: infinity, stephen, 15:21
- Re: find a third of a line?, leshanster, 15:18
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jim Spriggs, 15:11
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 14:58
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:50
- Re: find a third of a line?, Jim Spriggs, 14:45
- Re: A statement about polynomial time solvability, stephen, 14:43
- Re: Lower bounds on Rank, Robert Israel, 14:43
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 14:41
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 14:39
- Re: Prime Generator!!!!!, Robert Israel, 14:37
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:30
- Re: find a third of a line?, leshanster, 14:29
- Re: Why sci.math?, Robert Israel, 14:26
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 14:25
- odd mortgage question, jhp_news_only, 14:18
- Re: fractional moments of normally distributed random, Robert Israel, 14:17
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), brian a m stuckless, 14:14
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:10
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:03
- Re: find a third of a line?, Jim Spriggs, 14:01
- Re: find a third of a line?, Randy Poe, 13:54
- Re: fractional moments of normally distributed random, Julian V. Noble, 13:43
- Re: find a third of a line?, leshanster, 13:43
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 13:39
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 13:35
- Re: find a third of a line?, Randy Poe, 13:32
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Ittay Weiss, 13:29
- Re: sine inverse of something, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:28
- Re: Why sci.math?, David Ames, 13:27
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Schoenfeld, 13:24
- Re: find a third of a line?, leshanster, 13:23
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Ittay Weiss, 13:21
- Re: Integral(acr sinx)^2= ?????, Jim Spriggs, 13:20
- Re: Baseball field, Randy Poe, 13:17
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Ittay Weiss, 13:14
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 13:04
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 13:04
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 13:01
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:59
- Re: connected subsets of R^2, Robert Israel, 12:56
- Re: Baseball field, gwh, 12:47
- Re: Updated unexpected hanging paradox bibliography, Lee Rudolph, 12:45
- Re: sine inverse of something, gwh, 12:40
- Re: Alternative to probability, Herman Rubin, 12:36
- Re: infinity, Jiri Lebl, 12:32
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 12:31
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 12:27
- Re: question on series solution to differential equations..., alexandru . lupas, 12:22
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 12:19
- Re: fractional moments of normally distributed random, the softrat, 12:12
- Re: Limit of sin(x)/x, Jim Spriggs, 12:11
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:11
- Alternative to probability, Robert L. Kaufman, 12:06
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 12:06
- Re: Expected value, Herman Rubin, 12:05
- Re: what makes it true?, Ron Peterson, 12:03
- Re: Prime Generator!!!!!, fishfry, 11:58
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Robert Low, 11:58
- Re: 2 questions (about L^2 ??), computer, 11:54
- Re: find a third of a line?, briggs, 11:51
- Baseball field, Darin, 11:48
- Re: convergence in law, Herman Rubin, 11:47
- Re: what makes it true?, luiroto, 11:47
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 11:44
- Re: find a third of a line?, Randy Poe, 11:41
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 11:37
- Re: Integral(acr sinx)^2= ?????, TTTomek, 11:22
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 11:21
- Re: I am curious about old algorithms, Herman Rubin, 11:16
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 11:14
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Herman Rubin, 11:14
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 11:11
- Re: what makes it true?, Ron Peterson, 11:09
- Re: infinity, stephen, 11:09
- DOFs in coordinate mapping if metrics specified?, Brian German, 11:08
- Re: Rotating higher order tensors, Gordon, 11:07
- Re: find a third of a line?, Pubkeybreaker, 11:06
- E[longest run length] out N flips?, kj, 11:05
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, The Ghost In The Machine, 11:00
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 10:59
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 10:39
- Re: what makes it true?, G.E. Ivey, 10:39
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 10:38
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:33
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:32
- Re: i need ur help, G.E. Ivey, 10:31
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 10:31
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 10:30
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Han de Bruijn, 10:29
- Re: 2 questions (about L^2 ??), José Carlos Santos, 10:28
- Re: sum of zetas, Gottfried Helms, 10:28
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:28
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 10:28
- Re: connected subsets of R^2, Daniel Grubb, 10:27
- find a third of a line?, leshanster, 10:25
- i need ur help, diokpa, 10:21
- Re: Unconvining Problem And Convincing Proof, Arturo Magidin, 10:20
- Re: Unconvining Problem And Convincing Proof, Nathan, 10:16
- Re: connected subsets of R^2, Daniel Grubb, 10:12
- Re: Integral(acr sinx)^2= ?????, Bart Goddard, 10:12
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Arturo Magidin, 10:07
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Samuele, 10:03
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:02
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 10:01
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 09:57
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 09:54
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 09:52
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:47
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:43
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:42
- Re: Integral(acr sinx)^2= ?????, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 09:36
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:32
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 09:32
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:16
- Re: Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad, 09:14
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Michael Stemper, 09:10
- Integral(acr sinx)^2= ?????, TTTomek, 09:07
- 2 questions (about L^2 ??), computer, 09:06
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jim Spriggs, 09:01
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jim Spriggs, 08:59
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Michael Stemper, 08:53
- Re: fractional moments of normally distributed random, A N Niel, 08:42
- Re: Limit of sin(x)/x, Jim Spriggs, 08:41
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Ittay Weiss, 08:40
- Re: Normal subgroups of S_n, Arturo Magidin, 08:40
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Michael Stemper, 08:38
- Re: fractional moments of normally distributed random, G. A. Edgar, 08:29
- Re: Normal subgroups of S_n, Jannick Asmus, 08:12
- Re: Prime Generator!!!!!, Justin, 07:56
- Re: fractional moments of normally distributed random, donstockbauer, 07:46
- Re: Making a system linearly independent., Martin, 07:45
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Han de Bruijn, 07:44
- Re: Normal subgroups of S_n, Van, 07:34
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 07:30
- Re: connected subsets of R^2, William Elliot, 06:51
- Re: fractional moments of normally distributed random, Julian V. Noble, 06:41
- Re: Normal subgroups of S_n, Jyrki Lahtonen, 06:36
- Re: Prime Generator!!!!!, Dave, 06:26
- Re: Prime Generator!!!!!, Dave, 06:24
- " Wanted solution to g(x) = f(x)+ c*f(m(x)) , f unknown ", alainverghote, 06:22
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Ittay Weiss, 06:18
- Re: Prime Generator!!!!!, Dave, 06:17
- Re: Can You Have Infinity Without Eternity?, Ittay Weiss, 06:15
- Re: loop in simplicial complex, Yves De Cornulier, 06:13
- Re: Why sci.math?, Shytot, 06:07
- Making a system linearly independent., pmatos, 06:06
- Re: Prime Generator!!!!!, pmatos, 06:03
- Re: Why sci.math?, Shytot, 06:03
- Re: Why sci.math?, Shytot, 06:02
- Re: Normal subgroups of S_n, Jannick Asmus, 05:45
- Re: Prime Generator!!!!!, Dave, 05:26
- fractional moments of normally distributed random, Mathematics Lover, 05:18
- fractional moments of normally distributed random, Mathematics Lover, 05:18
- Lower bounds on Rank, Elias Vicari, 05:05
- Prime Generator!!!!!, Dave, 05:03
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:55
- Re: Why sci.math?, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:50
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 04:49
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 04:47
- Re: Why sci.math?, john_ramsden, 04:37
- Re: Why sci.math?, , 04:27
- Re: [REQ] Yahtzee game probabilities, Samuele, 04:16
- Re: connected subsets of R^2, Robert Israel, 04:09
- Re: Rotating higher order tensors, Sarah Mang, 04:01
- Re: Why sci.math?, David Kastrup, 04:00
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 03:57
- Re: Why sci.math?, Mat Cross, 03:43
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 03:43
- Normal subgroups of S_n, Jannick Asmus, 03:31
- Re: Steiner Systems, Jyrki Lahtonen, 03:19
- Re: A statement about polynomial time solvability, Proginoskes, 02:54
- Re: Why sci.math?, William Elliot, 02:52
- Re: Why sci.math?, Proginoskes, 02:46
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Robert Israel, 02:45
- Re: Why sci.math?, David Ames, 02:43
- Re: Limit of sin(x)/x, bill, 02:43
- Re: A weird question about pi, Proginoskes, 02:40
- Re: how to get the average value, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:30
- Re: how to get the average value, Proginoskes, 02:30
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Bilge, 02:14
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 01:52
- Re: connected subsets of R^2, Ulysse Keller, 01:48
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 01:39
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 01:24
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 01:09
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 00:56
- Re: referencesfor these coefficients, Rainer Rosenthal, 00:28
- Re: A statement about polynomial time solvability, SASWATA SHANNIGRAHI, 00:26
- Re: Why sci.math?, fishfry, 00:18
- Re: Unconvining Problem And Convincing Proof, husam, 00:09
- Re: referencesfor these coefficients, Gerry Myerson, 00:07
- Re: A weird question about pi - now x to the x, Robert Israel, 00:06
September 08, 2005
- how to get the average value, buaanupt, 23:48
- Re: Expected value, Robert Israel, 23:35
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 23:18
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, quasi, 23:17
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA/reply to ScatBoy LindstedtKnight, Gray Shockley, 23:16
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA/reply to ScatBoy LindstedtKnight, Gray Shockley, 22:58
- referencesfor these coefficients, Michael Blanc, 22:56
- Re: New and faster algorithm for multiplication, Dik T. Winter, 22:02
- Re: help with sets, Pastel, 22:02
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:57
- Re: Unconvining Problem And Convincing Proof, Arturo Magidin, 21:48
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 21:42
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 21:36
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:31
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 21:26
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, William Elliot, 21:26
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:24
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:23
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:17
- New MathWorld entry, Ioannis, 21:10
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Tony, 21:08
- Re: infinity, stephen, 21:07
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:07
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 21:01
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:52
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:47
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:42
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:29
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:21
- Re: Expected value, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 20:00
- Re: Unconvining Problem And Convincing Proof, husam, 19:59
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:58
- Re: Hamming Bound, Anon, 19:55
- Re: Expected value, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 19:46
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Tony, 19:36
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Tony, 19:30
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:30
- Re: Limit of sin(x)/x, Jim Spriggs, 19:27
- GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS, ACE, 19:22
- Re: infinity, stephen, 19:17
- Re: Unconvining Problem And Convincing Proof, Gerry Myerson, 19:07
- Re: Expected value, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 19:04
- Re: Unconvining Problem And Convincing Proof, Menyoung Lee, 19:03
- Re: Unconvining Problem And Convincing Proof, Arturo Magidin, 19:01
- Re: Unconvining Problem And Convincing Proof, Nathan, 18:59
- Limit of sin(x)/x, bill, 18:59
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 18:58
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:49
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 18:46
- Re: convergence in law, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 18:36
- Unconvining Problem And Convincing Proof, husam, 18:29
- Re: Expected value, Randy Poe, 18:28
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Robert Israel, 18:26
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 18:20
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 18:11
- Re: sine inverse of something, Proginoskes, 18:05
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 17:55
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Dirk Van de moortel, 17:51
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], quasi, 17:49
- Re: A weird question about pi - now x to the x, Mike Speed, 17:28
- Re: convergence in law, ArtflDodgr, 17:25
- Re: Expected value, Robert Israel, 17:20
- Re: 1/89 and the Fibonacci sequence., Zdislav V. Kovarik, 17:17
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, toby, 17:06
- Re: Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad, 16:58
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 16:50
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:40
- Re: continuity and differentiability, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:40
- Re: I am curious about old algorithms, John Bailey, 16:37
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 16:29
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, T.H. Ray, 16:28
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:28
- Re: what makes it true?, cbrown, 16:22
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:21
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 16:14
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:10
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:04
- Re: I am curious about old algorithms, amcwill417, 16:04
- Re: infinity, stephen, 16:04
- Re: what makes it true?, Dave Seaman, 15:58
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 15:56
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:54
- Re: Expected value, Robert Israel, 15:53
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:46
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 15:46
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Ken S. Tucker, 15:45
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Han . deBruijn, 15:39
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:39
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 15:39
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:37
- Re: convergence in law, legomir2000, 15:36
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 15:30
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:22
- Re: Expected value, briggs, 15:22
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:16
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:11
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 15:07
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 15:06
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 15:04
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, Michael Orion, 15:00
- Re: what makes it true?, Jim Spriggs, 14:59
- Re: Expected value, Randy Poe, 14:59
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Arturo Magidin, 14:57
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:56
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:53
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:50
- Re: Expected value, briggs, 14:45
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:45
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 14:44
- Re: Expected value, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:43
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 14:43
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA/reply to ScatBoy LindstedtKnight, Cary Kittrell, 14:41
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:39
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 14:36
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:35
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:34
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:33
- Re: Verify Your Sky Bank Account, quasi, 14:31
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:30
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:29
- Re: Expected value, Randy Poe, 14:28
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:28
- Re: A statement about polynomial time solvability, Robert Israel, 14:27
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 14:25
- Re: help with sets, Arturo Magidin, 14:19
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Robert Israel, 14:18
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:15
- Re: Expected value, briggs, 14:15
- Re: help with sets, Jonas, 14:15
- Re: help with sets, Arturo Magidin, 14:14
- A statement about polynomial time solvability, SASWATA SHANNIGRAHI, 14:13
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Pastel, 14:11
- connected subsets of R^2, quasi, 14:08
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Lee Rudolph, 14:03
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], NotP, 14:02
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 13:57
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Michael Stemper, 13:56
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Michael Stemper, 13:54
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, David C. Ullrich, 13:53
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA/reply to ScatBoy LindstedtKnight, jacobisrael, 13:53
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 13:51
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:48
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 13:46
- Re: what makes it true?, Jim Spriggs, 13:42
- Re: help with sets, Pastel, 13:41
- Re: what makes it true?, Jim Spriggs, 13:41
- Re: help with sets, Pastel, 13:36
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:26
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 13:22
- Re: connected subsets of R^2, Robert Israel, 13:18
- Re: Expected value, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:16
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 13:11
- Re: help with sets, Jonathan Hoyle, 13:11
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 13:06
- Re: Hamming Bound, jeffconner50, 13:05
- Re: Hamming Bound, jeffconner50, 13:04
- Re: Hamming Bound, jeffconner50, 13:02
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:59
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Arturo Magidin, 12:58
- average size of the antichain, sasha mal, 12:58
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:57
- Re: Expected value, Randy Poe, 12:56
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:55
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:53
- Re: convergence in law, ArtflDodgr, 12:52
- Re: Expected value, Someonekicked, 12:51
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:46
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:43
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:42
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 12:41
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 12:40
- Re: help with sets, Pastel, 12:40
- Re: No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], José Carlos Santos, 12:39
- No homeomorphism (0,1) <--> [0,1], Michael Stemper, 12:34
- Re: help with sets, Arturo Magidin, 12:31
- Re: Expected value, Someonekicked, 12:31
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), Dirk Van de moortel, 12:31
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 12:30
- Re: help with sets, Arturo Magidin, 12:30
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 12:30
- Re: Rotating higher order tensors, Gordon, 12:29
- Re: help with sets, pastelsalad@xxxxxxxxx, 12:29
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 12:26
- Re: infinity, stephen, 12:22
- Expected value, TCL, 12:21
- Re: infinity, stephen, 12:19
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:13
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 12:10
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:09
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:08
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, David W . Cantrell, 12:03
- Re: infinity, stephen, 12:03
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:01
- Re: connected subsets of R^2, Daniel Grubb, 11:58
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 11:58
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:58
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 11:56
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 11:55
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:54
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 11:54
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 11:54
- Re: convergence in law, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:52
- Re: help with sets, Jonas, 11:51
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:51
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:40
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 11:35
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 11:34
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 11:33
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Michel Hack, 11:32
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:23
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 11:22
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:16
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:09
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 11:08
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 11:08
- Verify Your Sky Bank Account, "support@xxxxxxxxx", 11:06
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:01
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 11:01
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:00
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:58
- convergence in law, legomir2000, 10:56
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:49
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:48
- Rotating higher order tensors, Sarah Mang, 10:40
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:37
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:36
- Re: help with sets, Jonas, 10:34
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 10:33
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, john_ramsden, 10:30
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 10:23
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:10
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 10:09
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 10:00
- Re: I am curious about old algorithms, mathedman, 09:59
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 09:57
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 09:50
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, quasi, 09:42
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Daryl McCullough, 09:39
- Algebraic Geometry exercises from Liu, Lukas Horosiewicz, 09:36
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 09:07
- Re: Please Help With A Homework Problem, David C . Ullrich, 09:04
- Re: 'and' or 'or', David C . Ullrich, 09:00
- Re: help with sets, Arturo Magidin, 08:54
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, David C . Ullrich, 08:53
- Re: sum of zetas, Jon Slaughter, 08:52
- help with sets, Jonas, 08:51
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 08:51
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Dave Seaman, 08:48
- Re: what makes it true?, David C . Ullrich, 08:45
- Signal mapping probability, Nick, 08:43
- Re: New and faster algorithm for multiplication, Hans Petter Selasky, 08:32
- GR-Tivity TRACK-marks.!!, brian a m stuckless, 08:24
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 08:18
- Re: graph theory, Rick Decker, 08:17
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 08:02
- Re: How to do this Integral, A N Niel, 08:01
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 07:55
- Re: I am curious about old algorithms, Juuitchan, 07:55
- Re: sine inverse of something, A N Niel, 07:54
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 07:43
- Re: I am curious about old algorithms, --CELKO--, 07:41
- Re: infinity, Martin Shobe, 07:39
- Re: Sobolev space question, David C . Ullrich, 07:32
- Re: what makes it true?, denis feldmann, 07:32
- Re: what makes it true?, denis feldmann, 07:24
- sine inverse of something, Water Cooler v2, 07:23
- Re: infinity, Martin Shobe, 07:19
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Lee Rudolph, 07:19
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, T.H. Ray, 06:59
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, john_ramsden, 06:17
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 06:11
- Re: what makes it true?, Esa A E Peuha, 06:03
- Re: what makes it true?, Esa A E Peuha, 05:54
- Re: what makes it true?, , 05:00
- Re: what makes it true?, , 04:54
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA/reply to ScatBoy LindstedtKnight, Gray Shockley, 04:51
- Re: sum of zetas, Gottfried Helms, 04:45
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Narasimham, 04:37
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:20
- graph theory, Li Yi, 04:03
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:58
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 03:49
- Re: Some reference for Banach density (uniform density)?, Martin, 03:40
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 03:39
- Re: what makes it true?, Keith Ramsay, 03:22
- Re: Please Help With A Homework Problem, Proginoskes, 02:28
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 02:25
- Re: Euler Line, Maury Barbato, 02:23
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Robert Israel, 02:14
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Proginoskes, 02:05
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Proginoskes, 02:05
- Re: Common sensible definitions & equations, Jim Black, 01:51
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 01:44
- Re: Please Help With A Homework Problem, Virgil, 01:32
- Re: How to do this Integral, never, 01:29
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:19
- Re: infinity, stephen, 01:10
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:07
- Re: Help with tensors (re-post), schoenfeld1, 00:49
- Re: question on series solution to differential equations..., Igor Khavkine, 00:38
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:35
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:13
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 00:02
September 07, 2005
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, quasi, 23:49
- Re: 30 seconds. Can you do this partial fraction expansion fast paper and pencil?, kiki, 23:45
- Re: Hamming Bound, Anon, 23:37
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 23:32
- Re: infinity, stephen, 23:22
- Re: Finding an upper Darboux integral, Dave L. Renfro, 23:21
- How to do this Integral, anuraagm, 23:13
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 23:12
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, William Elliot, 22:52
- Re: infinity, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:46
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:45
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:43
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:39
- Re: what makes it true?, Dave Seaman, 22:29
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:25
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 22:19
- Re: Limits and e, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 22:18
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:18
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 22:14
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 22:13
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:10
- Re: Limits and e, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 22:09
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:05
- I am curious about old algorithms, Juuitchan, 22:00
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:59
- Re: Please Help With A Homework Problem, Gerry Myerson, 21:59
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Nathan, 21:57
- Re: Please Help With A Homework Problem, Russell, 21:49
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:48
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Nathan, 21:43
- Re: New and faster algorithm for multiplication, Dik T. Winter, 21:37
- Please Help With A Homework Problem, Randy Yates, 21:28
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:26
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:25
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:25
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:20
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:49
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 20:49
- Re: infinity, stephen, 20:44
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 20:28
- Re: what makes it true?, Jim Spriggs, 20:27
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 20:23
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 20:22
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:20
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 20:11
- Re: infinity, stephen, 19:43
- Re: what makes it true?, Dik T. Winter, 19:42
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Dik T. Winter, 19:36
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:29
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., stephen, 19:17
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., bill, 19:16
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:11
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., bill, 19:04
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Dave Seaman, 19:02
- Re: Limits and e, Joseph Fagan, 18:59
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., bill, 18:55
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, James Dolan, 18:51
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 18:49
- Re: Limits and e, Jim Spriggs, 18:49
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 18:44
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Proginoskes, 18:38
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 18:25
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Timothy Little, 18:19
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Proginoskes, 18:18
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Timothy Little, 18:11
- Re: Review of Leonard Susskinds book on Black Holes and Strings, Androcles, 18:08
- Re: Line Graphs, Proginoskes, 18:07
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:05
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Proginoskes, 17:59
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:58
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Proginoskes, 17:57
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., bill, 17:56
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:53
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Arturo Magidin, 17:52
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:51
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:48
- Re: 'and' or 'or', Dirk Van de moortel, 17:44
- Re: Review of Leonard Susskinds book on Black Holes and Strings, dirkbontes, 17:44
- Re: Euler Line, Minus XVII, 17:44
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:43
- Re: INFINITY Revisited, Minus XVII, 17:41
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:38
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:35
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Narasimham, 17:31
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, James Dolan, 17:30
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:26
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 17:21
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 17:20
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 17:18
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Per Vognsen, 17:12
- Re: Limits and e, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 17:11
- Re: Limits and e, Joseph Fagan, 17:08
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 17:04
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 17:02
- Re: Limits and e, Joseph Fagan, 17:00
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Arturo Magidin, 16:59
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Arturo Magidin, 16:54
- Re: Bicriteria graph theory problem? What do you call this?, Proginoskes, 16:53
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:52
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Ittay Weiss, 16:51
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, barr, 16:49
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, James Dolan, 16:49
- Re: 1/89 and the Fibonacci sequence-, JEMebius, 16:43
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Ed Hook, 16:37
- Re: Limits and e, Jim Spriggs, 16:37
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 16:37
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:36
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 16:32
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 16:31
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:30
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:26
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:25
- question on series solution to differential equations..., kiki, 16:23
- Re: Limits and e, Jim Spriggs, 16:23
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Nathan, 16:21
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 16:17
- Re: loop in simplicial complex, James Dolan, 16:17
- Re: 1/89 and the Fibonacci sequence., Robert Israel, 16:17
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 16:16
- Re: 'and' or 'or', Luna Sea, 16:13
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:09
- Re: Primes, Palindromes, and Pyramids, Bill McCray, 16:09
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:05
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 16:01
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 15:59
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:59
- Line Graphs, bill, 15:57
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:55
- Re: A weird question about pi, Herman Rubin, 15:53
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:52
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 15:51
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:50
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 15:50
- Re: infinity, Dave Rusin, 15:45
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:44
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Jiri Lebl, 15:43
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:42
- Limits and e, Joseph Fagan, 15:42
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:40
- Re: 'and' or 'or', G. A. Edgar, 15:39
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 15:38
- Re: 'and' or 'or', Joseph Fagan, 15:38
- Re: Fifth roots of unity, Roger Beresford, 15:34
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:33
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:31
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:29
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:28
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:25
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:23
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:23
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 15:20
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:18
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 15:15
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:14
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 15:13
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 15:12
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 15:07
- Re: A weird question about pi, Robert Israel, 15:02
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:01
- Re: [REQ] Yahtzee game probabilities, Keith A. Lewis, 14:58
- Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad, 14:49
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:47
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 14:45
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:43
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Arturo Magidin, 14:32
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:29
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 14:27
- Re: 'and' or 'or', Arturo Magidin, 14:26
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:23
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:22
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Ittay Weiss, 14:21
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:20
- Re: 1/89 and the Fibonacci sequence., Dan, 14:15
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Ittay Weiss, 14:11
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Ed Hook, 14:09
- Re: A weird question about pi, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:04
- Re: 'and' or 'or', Jim Spriggs, 14:04
- Re: 1/89 and the Fibonacci sequence., Dan, 14:03
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Martin . Sleziak, 14:03
- Hamming Bound, jeffconner50, 13:58
- Re: combination, Keith A. Lewis, 13:58
- Re: A weird question about pi, Ronald Bruck, 13:57
- Re: 'and' or 'or', Jim Spriggs, 13:57
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 13:56
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 13:55
- 1/89 and the Fibonacci sequence., Dan, 13:55
- Re: 'and' or 'or', mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:55
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 13:54
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:52
- Re: 'and' or 'or', Dirk Van de moortel, 13:52
- Parastatistics, Anyons & Fractal Cartan Forms, Jack Sarfatti, 13:51
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 13:51
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 13:51
- Re: what makes it true?, Dave Rusin, 13:50
- Re: Bijection from N x N -> N, Keith A. Lewis, 13:49
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:47
- Re: 'and' or 'or', Luna Sea, 13:47
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Nathan, 13:46
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:45
- Re: A weird question about pi - now x to the x, Jim Spriggs, 13:41
- Re: Quantity Matrices and Counting Problems, Ittay Weiss, 13:40
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:37
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:37
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, johnicholas . hines, 13:36
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, John Coleman, 13:34
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:33
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 13:29
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Ittay Weiss, 13:28
- Re: 'and' or 'or', Randy Poe, 13:28
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:26
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Jim Spriggs, 13:22
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 13:21
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:21
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:19
- 'and' or 'or', uryt_567, 13:15
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:13
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 13:11
- Re: A weird question about pi - now x to the x, Jim Spriggs, 13:08
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 13:07
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 13:05
- Re: A weird question about pi, Herman Rubin, 13:03
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:00
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:57
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Rubin, 12:57
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 12:55
- Re: Quantity Matrices and Counting Problems, DGoncz, 12:53
- re: Has Lenny Susskind improved upon Richard Feynman?, Jack Sarfatti, 12:52
- Re: Fifth roots of unity, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 12:51
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 12:51
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:50
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 12:44
- Re: what makes it true?, David Kastrup, 12:43
- Re: [REQ] Yahtzee game probabilities, Androcles, 12:41
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:41
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:38
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 12:38
- Re: A weird question about pi - now x to the x, Robert Israel, 12:32
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:25
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 12:25
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:22
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:20
- Re: New and faster algorithm for multiplication, Patrick, 12:19
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:15
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:10
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:07
- Re: infinity, Jiri Lebl, 12:07
- Re: Geometric average and Arithmetic average, bnath001, 12:07
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:04
- Re: A weird question about pi - now x to the x, Mike Speed, 12:02
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:56
- Re: New and faster algorithm for multiplication, Hans Petter Selasky, 11:53
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 11:51
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:50
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 11:49
- New and faster algorithm for multiplication, Hans Petter Selasky, 11:48
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:42
- Intrinsic Equation of Parallel/Offset curves, Narasimham, 11:38
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Ronald Bruck, 11:37
- Looking for an algorithm, sasha mal, 11:34
- Re: loop in simplicial complex, Ed Hook, 11:32
- Re: INFINITY Revisited, Randy Poe, 11:28
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:26
- Re: Geometric average and Arithmetic average, Keith A. Lewis, 11:25
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 11:21
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:15
- [REQ] Yahtzee game probabilities, Samuele, 11:15
- Re: sum of zetas, Jon Slaughter, 11:10
- Re: INFINITY Revisited, imaginatorium, 11:09
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 10:58
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 10:42
- Re: what makes it true?, Robert Low, 10:36
- Re: what makes it true?, Robert Low, 10:35
- Re: Fifth roots of unity, Clifford Nelson, 10:34
- Re: what makes it true?, Bart Goddard, 10:33
- Re: what makes it true?, Bart Goddard, 10:32
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, David C . Ullrich, 10:31
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Arturo Magidin, 10:28
- Re: FFT Help, Rusty, 10:28
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 10:24
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 10:23
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Narasimham, 10:20
- Re: what makes it true?, , 10:18
- Re: what makes it true?, Esa A E Peuha, 10:13
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Arturo Magidin, 10:07
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 10:06
- Re: a question about vector subspaces, Arturo Magidin, 10:06
- Re: sum of zetas, Gottfried Helms, 10:04
- Call for Papers on Embedded Cryptographic Systems, nadia, 10:01
- FFT Help, samirakazan, 10:00
- Re: Bijection from N x N -> N, The Ghost In The Machine, 10:00
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Ittay Weiss, 09:58
- Re: what makes it true?, Robert Low, 09:57
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 09:56
- Re: what makes it true?, Robert Low, 09:55
- Re: what makes it true?, Ittay Weiss, 09:53
- Re: How do you find derivatives in noisy data?, sn00ge, 09:52
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 09:51
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 09:50
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 09:48
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 09:47
- Re: what makes it true?, Daniel Grubb, 09:46
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 09:45
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:45
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 09:44
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 09:42
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 09:42
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Robert Low, 09:38
- Re: what makes it true?, Esa A E Peuha, 09:37
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 09:34
- Re: A weird question about pi, Jonathan Hoyle, 09:33
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 09:29
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:27
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 09:23
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 09:21
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 09:20
- Re: Fifth roots of unity, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 09:20
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Peter Webb, 09:14
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Ittay Weiss, 09:14
- Re: what makes it true?, David Kastrup, 09:13
- Re: what makes it true?, Ittay Weiss, 09:09
- Re: bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, William Elliot, 09:05
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:00
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 08:55
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Samuele, 08:54
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 08:53
- Re: A weird question about pi, Randy Poe, 08:52
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 08:49
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 08:47
- Euler Line, Maury Barbato, 08:43
- Re: what makes it true?, Ittay Weiss, 08:42
- bijection of R: R <--> Rx.....xR, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 08:40
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, William Elliot, 08:34
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, William Elliot, 08:30
- loop in simplicial complex, Yves De Cornulier, 08:29
- Re: A weird question about pi, G. A. Edgar, 08:27
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, Peter Webb, 08:13
- Fifth roots of unity, Clifford Nelson, 08:01
- Re: what makes it true?, denis feldmann, 07:58
- Re: maths is a mystery, never, 07:48
- Re: what makes it true?, denis feldmann, 07:47
- Re: what makes it true?, denis feldmann, 07:45
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, name_and_address_supplied, 07:41
- maths is a mystery, crane, 07:38
- Re: Finite Field, Timothy Murphy, 07:27
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 07:15
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, William Elliot, 07:13
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 07:11
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, T.H. Ray, 07:09
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 07:06
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 07:00
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 06:56
- Re: New and faster algorithm for multiplication, Dik T. Winter, 06:53
- Re: what makes it true?, Ittay Weiss, 06:44
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 06:43
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 06:43
- Re: what makes it true?, Esa A E Peuha, 06:32
- Re: convolution problem, Jon Slaughter, 06:19
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 06:19
- Re: sum of zetas, pi, 06:16
- Re: Where do mathematical ideas come from?, Herman Jurjus, 06:15
- Re: sum of zetas, Jon Slaughter, 06:13
- Re: Finding an upper Darboux integral, Noh, 06:13
- Re: New and faster algorithm for multiplication, Hans Petter Selasky, 06:12
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 06:11
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 06:07
- Re: New and faster algorithm for multiplication, Hans Petter Selasky, 06:06
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 06:01
- Re: what makes it true?, Esa A E Peuha, 06:01
- Re: what makes it true?, Han de Bruijn, 06:00
- Re: convolution problem, Karl, 05:49
- Re: Bicriteria graph theory problem? What do you call this?, Ken Honda, 05:43
- convolution problem, buda, 05:39
- Re: Embedding of C in C², LandureLudovic, 05:33
- Re: Geometric average and Arithmetic average, JEMebius, 05:31
- sum of zetas, Gottfried Helms, 05:26
- Re: question about wreath product, , 05:22
- Re: 30 seconds. Can you do this partial fraction expansion fast paper and pencil?, john_ramsden, 05:16
- Re: what makes it true?, , 05:14
- Re: Snake lemma-Five lemma, singau, 04:31
- Re: combination, never, 04:17
- Re: A weird question about pi, jimmy, 04:14
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 04:03
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 03:58
- Re: combination, Proginoskes, 03:37
- combination, sunnewton, 03:29
- Quantity Matrices and Counting Problems, DGoncz, 03:12
- Re: a question about vector subspaces, woodland, 02:44
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Robert Israel, 01:15
- Has Lenny Susskind surpassed Richard Feynman?, Jack Sarfatti, 00:20
September 06, 2005
- Re: Bijection from N x N -> N, Gabriel Maybrun, 22:53
- Re: Bijection from N x N -> N, Gabriel Maybrun, 22:42
- Re: A weird question about pi, Peter Webb, 22:39
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 21:17
- Re: weil pairing, brain, 12:31
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:30
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:22
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:15
- Re: Aleph_2 as size of set of all real functions, Keith A. Lewis, 12:14
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Liviu, 12:02
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 11:57
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 11:50
- Re: A conjecture about maximal planar graphs, SASWATA SHANNIGRAHI, 11:48
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 11:41
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:40
- Re: Proposition, Carl Parkes, 11:38
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:37
- Quantized "vortices" in Emergent Gravity, Jack Sarfatti, 11:34
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:32
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 11:31
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:28
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Herman Rubin, 11:28
- Re: Special Prime Number or Proof wanted, Herman Rubin, 11:15
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:11
- Re: topology questions, Lee Rudolph, 11:07
- Re: Embedding of C in C², Lee Rudolph, 11:02
- Re: Review of Leonard Susskinds book on Black Holes and Strings, john_ramsden, 11:01
- Re: 0^0, David W . Cantrell, 10:48
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 10:45
- Re: How do you find derivatives in noisy data?, sn00ge, 10:36
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 10:35
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 10:32
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Lee Rudolph, 10:30
- Re: Review of Leonard Susskinds book on Black Holes and Strings, dirkbontes, 10:24
- Re: Closed Set Question, Ed Hook, 10:11
- Re: topology questions, Ed Hook, 09:51
- Re: what makes it true?, Bart Goddard, 09:34
- Re: topology...open map, David C . Ullrich, 09:20
- Embedding of C in C², LandureLudovic, 09:17
- Re: Proposition, David C . Ullrich, 09:14
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:11
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:08
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:06
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 09:01
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 08:59
- Poncelet's Theorem, Maury Barbato, 08:56
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Ronald Bruck, 08:51
- Re: question about wreath product, Arturo Magidin, 08:45
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 08:44
- Re: question about wreath product, Jose Melo, 08:34
- Re: Pure-cardinal approach *is* possible! (was: Mathematical concepts), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:18
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., David Kastrup, 08:10
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 08:02
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Torkel Franzen, 07:56
- Re: Math "From Scratch", Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:48
- Re: infinity and intuition, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:46
- Re: infinity and intuition, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:37
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Lee Rudolph, 07:30
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Lee Rudolph, 07:19
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 07:02
- topology...open map, mina_world, 06:54
- Re: Special Prime Number or Proof wanted, Gerhard Lantzsch, 06:52
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 06:37
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 06:31
- Bicriteria graph theory problem? What do you call this?, Ken Honda, 06:26
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 06:17
- Re: Questions about Cartesian product, Lee Rudolph, 06:15
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Timothy Little, 05:54
- Re: infinity and intuition, David Kastrup, 05:49
- Re: Closed Set Question, William Elliot, 05:43
- Re: " Wanted : do f(x) = x - sin(x) and g(x) commute ? ", alainverghote, 05:42
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Esa A E Peuha, 05:40
- Re: EconoPhysics: why did it die away?, Chas, 05:23
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Timothy Little, 05:16
- Re: infinity and intuition, Han de Bruijn, 05:14
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Timothy Little, 05:10
- Re: FINLAYSON Program Fails the Turing Test, Ross A. Finlayson, 05:05
- Re: Closed Set Question, José Carlos Santos, 05:01
- Re: Special Prime Number or Proof wanted, Gerry Myerson, 04:59
- Re: FINLAYSON Program Fails the Turing Test, David Kastrup, 04:54
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Han de Bruijn, 04:52
- FINLAYSON Program Fails the Turing Test, Ross A. Finlayson, 04:43
- Special Prime Number or Proof wanted, Gerhard Lantzsch, 04:42
- Re: infinity and intuition, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:23
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 04:12
- Re: infinity and intuition, David Kastrup, 04:02
- Re: infinity and intuition, Han de Bruijn, 03:58
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 03:46
- Re: 0^0, Torkel Franzen, 03:41
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 03:35
- Re: Homotopy Invariance, dmx_dawg, 03:34
- Re: The Coordinate "Virus", John Thingstad, 03:33
- Re: 30 seconds. Can you do this partial fraction expansion fast paper and pencil?, Andreas Stahel, 03:05
- Re: How do you find derivatives in noisy data?, Rod, 03:05
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Robert Israel, 02:59
- Re: Homotopy Invariance, dmx_dawg, 02:55
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 02:42
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 02:38
- Re: combinatorics question, Steve Pope, 02:34
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 02:29
- Re: completing the square when a matrix is singular, Karl, 02:20
- Re: The Coordinate "Virus", John Thingstad, 02:11
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 02:09
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Tony, 02:08
- Re: 0^0, Torkel Franzen, 02:07
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, quasi, 02:05
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 02:01
- Re: completing the square when a matrix is singular, Proginoskes, 01:48
- Re: Trouble with this advanced calc problem, Doug B, 01:47
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 01:20
- Re: 0,1 squares again, Proginoskes, 01:02
- Re: completing the square when a matrix is singular, Finance Incarnate, 00:59
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Rainer Rosenthal, 00:58
- Re: 30 seconds. Can you do this partial fraction expansion fast paper and pencil?, kiki, 00:21
September 05, 2005
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 23:53
- 30 seconds. Can you do this partial fraction expansion fast paper and pencil?, kiki, 23:52
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 23:45
- Re: Questions about Cartesian product, Arturo Magidin, 23:27
- Re: Homotopy Invariance, dmx_dawg, 23:07
- Re: Math "From Scratch", Dan Christensen, 22:39
- Re: Closed Set Question, Jason Pawloski, 21:58
- Re: Questions about Cartesian product, William Elliot, 21:55
- Re: Closed Set Question, Bill_42, 21:53
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Herman Rubin, 21:20
- Re: Woman steals 1997 dissertation, Timothy Murphy, 21:18
- Re: what makes it true?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:50
- Re: What's this equation for?, Luna Sea, 20:42
- Re: What's this equation for?, mathedman, 20:25
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Henry Ricardo, 20:03
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Eric Gisse, 19:56
- Re: what makes it true?, Keith Ramsay, 19:52
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jiri Lebl, 19:46
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Gerry Myerson, 19:26
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Ronald Bruck, 19:20
- Re: Matrix to Quaternion -, JEMebius, 19:18
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Gerry Myerson, 19:04
- Re: combinatorics question, Gerry Myerson, 18:47
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 18:24
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 18:12
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 18:12
- combinatorics question, Steve Pope, 18:10
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Bill Dubuque, 17:37
- Re: 0^0, David W . Cantrell, 17:36
- Re: Finding your Phone Number / Birthdate in Pi, Ulysse Keller, 17:34
- Re: Proposition, Ulysse Keller, 17:34
- Re: Analysis of Covariance, Ray Koopman, 17:20
- Re: Help, Dave Rusin, 17:07
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Tony, 17:02
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, David W . Cantrell, 16:39
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Tony, 16:26
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., cbrown, 16:26
- Re: How do you find derivatives in noisy data?, David Kastrup, 16:10
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Han . deBruijn, 16:06
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 16:02
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, David W . Cantrell, 16:00
- Re: infinity and intuition, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:47
- Re: Finding your Phone Number / Birthdate in Pi, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:40
- Re: How do you find derivatives in noisy data?, Daniel McLaury, 15:36
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Wim Benthem, 15:33
- Re: infinity and intuition, Han . deBruijn, 15:26
- Analysis of Covariance, Robert Vienneau, 15:26
- Re: 0^0, Golden Boar, 15:18
- Re: Strange function..., Zak, 15:14
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Tony, 15:07
- Re: le nouveau système verbal de la langue française (www.sixpourcent.com), mechmech, 14:57
- Re: Strange function..., Jim Spriggs, 14:50
- Re: Review of Leonard Susskinds book on Black Holes and Strings, Felix Rawlings, 14:44
- Re: " Wanted : do f(x) = x - sin(x) and g(x) commute ? ", Ronald Bruck, 14:40
- Re: Matrix to Quaternion, Hero, 14:40
- Re: 0^0, name_and_address_supplied, 14:36
- Matrix to Quaternion, Glenn G. Chappell, 14:13
- Re: topology questions, Lee Rudolph, 14:08
- Re: topology questions, W. Dale Hall, 14:02
- Re: Proposition, Jim Spriggs, 13:59
- Re: " Wanted : do f(x) = x - sin(x) and g(x) commute ? ", alainverghote, 13:57
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 13:57
- Re: torus (topologically speaking), Ed Hook, 13:55
- Review of Leonard Susskinds book on Black Holes and Strings, Jack Sarfatti, 13:39
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 13:37
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 13:27
- Re: Strange function..., Arturo Magidin, 13:06
- Finding your Phone Number / Birthdate in Pi, ggdbr01, 13:01
- Re: 0^0, The Ghost In The Machine, 13:00
- Proposition, Herb, 12:59
- How do you find derivatives in noisy data?, Robert Macy, 12:57
- Re: Woman steals 1997 dissertation, Richard Tobin, 12:54
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Lee Rudolph, 12:52
- Re: Pythagoras, charleswehner, 12:48
- Re: 0,1 squares again, steiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:42
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 12:42
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Liviu, 12:32
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 12:31
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 12:29
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 12:25
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 12:23
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., NotP, 12:23
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 12:22
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 12:17
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 12:15
- Re: Woman steals 1997 dissertation, Ronald Bruck, 12:15
- Re: " Wanted : do f(x) = x - sin(x) and g(x) commute ? ", Ronald Bruck, 12:11
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 12:11
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Ronald Bruck, 12:10
- Re: 0^0, Golden Boar, 12:09
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Lee Rudolph, 12:08
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 12:03
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Liviu, 11:59
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 11:57
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 11:54
- Re: 0^0, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:48
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Liviu, 11:43
- Re: what makes it true?, Bart Goddard, 11:40
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., NotP, 11:40
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 11:37
- Re: Pythagoras, charleswehner, 11:25
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., massimo67, 11:21
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Herman Rubin, 11:18
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Tony, 11:17
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 11:09
- Re: Distribution of Sum( x*lnx ), Herman Rubin, 11:07
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 11:05
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 11:05
- Re: completing the square when a matrix is singular, Karl, 11:01
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 10:57
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 10:56
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Dik T. Winter, 10:55
- Re: Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, temptony, 10:54
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Lee Rudolph, 10:49
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 10:41
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 10:37
- Re: Strange function..., Robert Low, 10:33
- Re: Strange function..., Robert Low, 10:30
- Re: L^p regularity, David C . Ullrich, 10:26
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 10:23
- Re: Distribution of Sum( x*lnx ), Trifon, 10:21
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 10:17
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 10:12
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 10:09
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 10:04
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 10:03
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 10:01
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 09:50
- Strange function..., Samuele, 09:45
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:45
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:43
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:31
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:29
- Re: Math "From Scratch", Ken Oliver, 09:26
- Why 40-cards solitaire has P=0.6525?, Samuele, 09:22
- Re: Distribution of Sum( x*lnx ), Rusty, 08:59
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 08:47
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Esa A E Peuha, 08:30
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 08:27
- Re: 0^0, Dik T. Winter, 08:05
- Re: Simple solution for a probability problem, iandjmsmith, 08:02
- Re: 0^0, David W . Cantrell, 08:00
- Re: Woman steals 1997 dissertation, Lee Rudolph, 07:51
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 07:49
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Han de Bruijn, 07:33
- shape (profile) of an egg in polar coordinates, Zinc Potterman, 07:22
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 06:52
- Re: Pythagoras, Philippe 92, 06:33
- Re: 0^0, The Ghost In The Machine, 06:00
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Han de Bruijn, 05:48
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Eric Gisse, 05:35
- Re: time, Carl Parkes, 05:31
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, José Carlos Santos, 05:29
- Re: time, Androcles, 04:59
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 04:59
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 04:54
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 04:42
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 04:36
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 05, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 04:34
- Re: derivatives as limit of a sequence of continuous functions, José Carlos Santos, 04:31
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 04:29
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 04:24
- Re: Woman steals 1997 dissertation, k wallace, 04:18
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, quasi, 04:12
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Tony, 04:11
- Re: what makes it true?, , 04:11
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Tony, 03:57
- Re: Be the first to own an XBox360 (for FREE!!!), never, 03:36
- Re: Distribution of Sum( x*lnx ), Trifon, 03:12
- Re: Math "From Scratch", Golden Boar, 03:09
- Be the first to own an XBox360 (for FREE!!!), Bob, 03:05
- Re: Math "From Scratch", Robert Low, 02:55
- Distribution of Sum( x*lnx ), Trifon, 02:50
- Re: What's this equation for?, Luna Sea, 02:45
- " Wanted : do f(x) = x - sin(x) and g(x) commute ? ", alainverghote, 02:16
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Liviu, 01:48
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Gray Shockley, 01:46
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Eric Gisse, 01:36
- Get more money for your used textbooks, mardirousi, 01:29
- completing the square when a matrix is singular, Finance Incarnate, 01:25
- Re: Help, Michael Jørgensen, 01:25
- Re: sums of distinct primes redux, Paul Pollack, 01:16
- Re: What's this equation for?, Michael Jørgensen, 01:07
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 01:06
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 01:03
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Narasimham, 00:58
- Re: Please help me solve this DE, Narasimham, 00:48
- Re: Please help me solve this DE, Brablo, 00:26
- Re: 0^0, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
September 04, 2005
- delta function - derivative in N dimensions, windom, 23:53
- Re: What's this equation for?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 23:38
- Re: What's this equation for?, Arturo Magidin, 23:27
- Re: What's this equation for?, Kira Yamato, 23:23
- Re: What's this equation for?, Golden Boar, 23:19
- Re: What's this equation for?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 23:19
- Re: derivatives as limit of a sequence of continuous functions, Artur, 23:15
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Dave L. Renfro, 23:10
- What's this equation for?, Golden Boar, 23:04
- Re: Math "From Scratch", Ken Pledger, 22:49
- Re: what makes it true?, mzafrullah, 22:40
- Re: boolean algebra question, ., 22:40
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Dave L. Renfro, 22:38
- Re: On the factors of an odd perfect number, joseabdris, 22:19
- Re: Some Banach spaces, Ronald Bruck, 21:44
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 21:40
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Ronald Bruck, 21:35
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Ronald Bruck, 21:28
- Re: Simple solution for a probability problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 21:27
- Re: Math "From Scratch", Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:47
- Re: infinite.... ignore the previous messages, Randy Poe, 20:37
- Re: boolean algebra question, Kira Yamato, 20:14
- Re: 0^0, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:06
- boolean algebra question, ., 20:02
- Re: Math "From Scratch", Jumbie, 20:01
- Re: weil pairing, Keith Ramsay, 19:56
- Re: infinite.... ignore the previous messages, ., 19:53
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 19:53
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Timothy Little, 19:53
- Math "From Scratch", rodney . elliott, 19:52
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 19:46
- Re: 0^0, Dik T. Winter, 19:35
- Re: expectation value of exponential function, JohnCreighton_, 19:17
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Brian Borchers, 19:07
- Re: infinite.... ignore the previous messages, Proginoskes, 19:02
- Re: 0,1 squares again, Proginoskes, 18:59
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Proginoskes, 18:54
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 18:53
- Re: what makes it true?, Bill Dubuque, 18:52
- Re: infinite.... ignore the previous messages, ., 18:49
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 18:45
- Re: 0,1 squares again, Randall, 18:39
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Timothy Little, 18:38
- Re: time, Proginoskes, 18:36
- torus (topologically speaking), mythen, 18:35
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Timothy Little, 18:24
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Bill Dubuque, 18:21
- Re: 0,1 squares again, The Ghost In The Machine, 18:00
- Re: How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, David W . Cantrell, 17:38
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 17:36
- Re: infinity and intuition, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:33
- Re: Transpose composite expression (matrix), Igor Khavkine, 17:33
- How to calculate two curves equidistant from a given curve?, Tony, 17:33
- Re: infinity and intuition, Martin Shobe, 17:23
- Re: 0^0, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:21
- Re: infinity and intuition, Martin Shobe, 17:21
- Re: expectation value of exponential function, donstockbauer, 17:18
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 17:01
- Re: expectation value of exponential function, Julian V. Noble, 16:59
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 16:57
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 16:53
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 16:50
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 16:48
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 16:41
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 16:40
- Re: 0^0, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:39
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 16:34
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 16:28
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 16:28
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Han . deBruijn, 16:26
- Re: 0^0, Jonathan Hoyle, 16:22
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 16:18
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Han . deBruijn, 16:15
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 16:09
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 15:58
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 15:58
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 15:43
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 15:41
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 15:41
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 15:34
- Re: vertices of square antiprism, James Buddenhagen, 15:31
- Re: Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo, Ed Murphy, 15:20
- Re: 0^0, David W . Cantrell, 15:08
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 15:07
- questions on two-dimesional delta function, Bruno Donati, 14:51
- Re: Finding an upper Darboux integral, Dave L. Renfro, 14:31
- Re: 0,1 squares again, Robert Israel, 14:25
- Re: 0^0, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:22
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 14:20
- Re: Transpose composite expression (matrix), Ed Hook, 13:36
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 13:15
- Re: Homotopy Invariance, Ed Hook, 13:10
- Re: what makes it true?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:03
- Re: vertices of square antiprism, John, 12:46
- vertices of square antiprism, John, 12:31
- 0,1 squares again, steiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:30
- Re: what makes it true?, mzafrullah, 12:27
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Carl Parkes, 12:21
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Liviu, 12:21
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:20
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 12:16
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 12:07
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 12:05
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 12:02
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Lee Rudolph, 12:01
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 11:59
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 11:53
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., N. Silver, 11:47
- time, proffink, 11:16
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 10:58
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Lee Rudolph, 10:51
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Liviu, 10:43
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 10:26
- Re: expectation value of exponential function, Philo D, 10:16
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 10:09
- Re: Tensor products of some Banach spaces, G. A. Edgar, 10:02
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Hero, 10:01
- Re: what makes it true?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 10:00
- Re: Finding an upper Darboux integral, David C . Ullrich, 09:58
- expectation value of exponential function, Finance Incarnate, 09:57
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:44
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Jim Spriggs, 09:42
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:40
- Re: Tensor product of Lebesgue measurable functions, José Carlos Santos, 09:38
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, José Carlos Santos, 09:36
- Re: Tensor product of Lebesgue measurable functions, A N Niel, 09:35
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:34
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:32
- Re: Tensor products of some Banach spaces, José Carlos Santos, 09:28
- Re: Simple solution for a probability problem, catalin . marinas, 09:27
- Need help for translating an abstract french -> english (7 lines), Lord Jim, 09:26
- Re: Tensor product of Lebesgue measurable functions, José Carlos Santos, 09:24
- Re: Pythagoras, charleswehner, 09:23
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 09:18
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 09:13
- Re: Finding an upper Darboux integral, Noh, 08:55
- Re: Finding an upper Darboux integral, Philo D, 08:43
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Noh, 08:42
- Re: Pythagoras, john_ramsden, 08:42
- Finding an upper Darboux integral, Noh, 08:34
- Anyone knows interval computation??, donggaofeng, 08:01
- Re: Rules for inverse and transpose matrices, David Kastrup, 07:55
- Rules for inverse and transpose matrices, Paminu, 07:46
- Re: Some Banach spaces, A N Niel, 07:35
- Re: Tensor product of Lebesgue measurable functions, A N Niel, 07:33
- Re: series converge, William Elliot, 07:28
- Re: Help with determining bearing, matt271829-news, 07:10
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 07:07
- Re: series converge, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 06:50
- Re: series converge, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 06:44
- Re: what makes it true?, , 06:43
- Re: Simple solution for a probability problem, Catalin Marinas, 06:33
- Re: series converge, William Elliot, 06:27
- Homotopy Invariance, Michael N. Christoff, 06:13
- Re: Transpose composite expression (matrix), Paminu, 06:13
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 05:59
- Re: 0^0, FunkyRes, 05:59
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 05:58
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 05:54
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 05:52
- Re: A X B is countable ?, William Elliot, 05:52
- Re: Tensor products of some Banach spaces, tommi . hoynalanmaa, 05:43
- Re: A X B is countable ?, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 05:42
- Re: infinity and intuition, Ross A. Finlayson, 05:40
- series converge, tamiry, 05:39
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Han . deBruijn, 05:34
- Tensor products of some Banach spaces, tommi . hoynalanmaa, 05:31
- A X B is countable ?, woodland, 05:28
- Re: infinity and intuition, Han . deBruijn, 05:27
- Re: 0^0, FunkyRes, 05:25
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Han . deBruijn, 05:12
- Re: What is the fifth number, Stef, 05:08
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 04:58
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 04:57
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 04:57
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 04:56
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 04:53
- Re: 0^0, Christian Bau, 04:35
- Re: 0^0, Christian Bau, 04:32
- Tensor product of Lebesgue measurable functions, tommi . hoynalanmaa, 04:29
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 04:28
- Re: Some Banach spaces, José Carlos Santos, 04:20
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Timothy Little, 04:03
- Some Banach spaces, tommi . hoynalanmaa, 04:00
- Re: derivatives as limit of a sequence of continuous functions, José Carlos Santos, 03:48
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 03:36
- optimizing Subdivision of rectangular area into regular shaps, Mostafa Hamed, 03:33
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 03:27
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 03:25
- Re: Sorry but I am not a mathematician..., Narcoleptic Insomniac, 03:08
- Re: infinite.... ignore the previous messages, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 02:53
- Re: how to prove this inequality, William Elliot, 02:26
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 02:22
- Sorry but I am not a mathematician..., eestath, 02:17
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Daniel W. Johnson, 02:12
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 02:05
- Re: how to prove this inequality, Proginoskes, 02:00
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Proginoskes, 01:48
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Proginoskes, 01:44
- Re: what makes it true?, Torkel Franzen, 01:43
- derivatives as limit of a sequence of continuous functions, Artur, 01:38
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:33
- Re: GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS, Jumbie, 01:17
- Re: infinte sets..., Proginoskes, 00:58
- Re: infinite.... ignore the previous messages, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 00:57
- Re: A conjecture about maximal planar graphs, Proginoskes, 00:54
- Re: Help with determining bearing, oliviasdad, 00:46
- Re: Help with determining bearing, oliviasdad, 00:43
- Re: infinte set in the intervals [0,1) and [1,+oo), Proginoskes, 00:33
- Re: What is the fifth number, Proginoskes, 00:26
- Re: Visit 'We the Thinking', Proginoskes, 00:18
September 03, 2005
- Re: 0^0, Dave Seaman, 23:16
- Re: sums of distinct primes redux, quasi, 22:58
- Re: how to prove this inequality, William Elliot, 22:39
- Re: infinity and intuition, Ross A. Finlayson, 22:30
- Re: ISO prime factorization algorithm for n <= 10^10, Dik T. Winter, 22:03
- Re: what makes it true?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:44
- Re: matrix*vector = vector, W. Dale Hall, 21:43
- Re: Transpose composite expression (matrix), Igor Khavkine, 21:30
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 20:46
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 20:36
- Re: 0^0, Dave Seaman, 20:18
- Re: what makes it true?, Ben Rudiak-Gould, 19:54
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 19:49
- Re: Gravity by Hartle - solutions manual, ACE, 19:22
- GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS, ACE, 19:16
- Re: how to prove this inequality, A N Niel, 19:09
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Bill Dubuque, 19:05
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Ronald Bruck, 19:02
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Ronald Bruck, 18:57
- infinite.... ignore the previous messages, eestath, 18:57
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Liviu, 18:53
- infinte sets..., eestath, 18:52
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Ronald Bruck, 18:52
- infinte sets..., eestath, 18:50
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 18:45
- how to prove this inequality, woodland, 18:43
- Re: 0^0, Dave Seaman, 18:38
- Re: How to get the distribution of this R.V., Rusty, 18:30
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 18:27
- Help, Kaka, 18:25
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, Roman B. Binder, 18:21
- Transpose composite expression (matrix), Paminu, 18:19
- Re: Pythagoras, luiroto, 18:14
- Re: what makes it true?, Ittay Weiss, 18:09
- Re: what makes it true?, Ittay Weiss, 18:01
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 17:54
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Bill Dubuque, 17:47
- Re: what makes it true?, Ittay Weiss, 17:44
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 17:42
- Re: what makes it true?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:42
- Re: A conjecture about maximal planar graphs, James Waldby, 17:38
- Re: what makes it true?, Robert J. Kolker, 17:37
- Re: sums of distinct primes redux, Pubkeybreaker, 17:35
- Re: 0^0, Christian Bau, 17:28
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Han . deBruijn, 17:26
- Re: What is the fifth number, Stef, 17:23
- Re: infinte set in the intervals [0,1) and [1,+oo), David C . Ullrich, 17:23
- Re: What is the fifth number, Stef, 17:22
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 17:22
- Re: What is the fifth number, Stef, 17:19
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 17:17
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Lee Rudolph, 17:16
- Re: A conjecture about maximal planar graphs, bill, 17:08
- Re: continuity and differentiability, Virgil, 17:07
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 17:06
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 17:04
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, José Carlos Santos, 17:04
- Re: what makes it true?, Bart Goddard, 17:03
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 17:01
- Re: Help with determining bearing, matt271829-news, 16:49
- Re: infinity and intuition, Han . deBruijn, 16:44
- Re: what makes it true?, Robert Low, 16:37
- Re: union of two subspaces W1 and W1, William Elliot, 16:36
- Re: 0^0, Robert Low, 16:35
- Re: continuity and differentiability, Robert Low, 16:30
- Re: infinte set in the intervals [0,1) and [1,+oo), William Elliot, 16:29
- Re: Help with determining bearing, matt271829-news, 16:29
- Pythagoras, charleswehner, 16:22
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 16:21
- Re: continuity and differentiability, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:19
- Re: continuity and differentiability, Lee Rudolph, 16:18
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 16:18
- Re: 0^0, Robert Low, 16:15
- Re: what makes it true?, Ittay Weiss, 16:14
- Re: Simple solution for a probability problem, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 16:13
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 16:10
- Re: A conjecture about maximal planar graphs, James Waldby, 16:04
- continuity and differentiability, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:02
- Re: 0^0, Dave Seaman, 15:59
- Re: 0^0, Dave Seaman, 15:56
- Re: 0^0, Robert Low, 15:56
- Re: How to get the distribution of this R.V., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:53
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 15:52
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Han . deBruijn, 15:27
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 15:25
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 15:20
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Han . deBruijn, 15:12
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Virgil, 15:07
- Re: matrix*vector = vector, Ittay Weiss, 15:05
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 15:01
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Han . deBruijn, 14:59
- Re: what makes it true?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:56
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 14:55
- Re: union of two subspaces W1 and W1, Barry Schwarz, 14:44
- Re: sums of distinct primes redux, Barry Schwarz, 14:33
- Re: 0^0, Arturo Magidin, 14:31
- Re: 0^0, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:29
- Re: 0^0, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:15
- Re: 0^0, Jonathan Hoyle, 14:11
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Eric Thurschwell, 14:09
- Re: How to get the distribution of this R.V., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:02
- Re: 0^0, Dave Seaman, 13:59
- Re: question about wreath product, Arturo Magidin, 13:52
- Re: what makes it true?, Robert J. Kolker, 13:50
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Jim Spriggs, 13:47
- Re: what makes it true?, Robert J. Kolker, 13:47
- Re: union of two subspaces W1 and W1, woodland, 13:45
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Jim Spriggs, 13:32
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Arturo Magidin, 13:31
- Re: inductive proof question, Barry Schwarz, 13:31
- Re: inductive proof question, Arturo Magidin, 13:27
- infinte set in the intervals [0,1) and [1,+oo), eestath, 13:24
- infinte set in the intervals [0,1) and [1,+oo), eestath, 13:23
- Help with determining bearing, oliviasdad, 13:12
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Ronald Bruck, 13:03
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 12:58
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 12:55
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Eric Thurschwell, 12:53
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 12:50
- Re: Injective => bijective?, Virgil, 12:50
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Herman Rubin, 12:34
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., quasi, 12:34
- question about wreath product, Jose Melo, 12:31
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., quasi, 12:29
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Lee Rudolph, 12:24
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., David C . Ullrich, 12:18
- Re: Discrete Math, Jim Spriggs, 12:16
- A conjecture about maximal planar graphs, SASWATA SHANNIGRAHI, 12:00
- Re: union of two subspaces W1 and W1, quasi, 11:46
- Re: Discrete Math, David C . Ullrich, 11:42
- Re: Injective => bijective?, quasi, 11:40
- Re: Visit 'We the Thinking', Jesse F. Hughes, 11:36
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, quasi, 11:18
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Dave L. Renfro, 11:14
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., NotP, 11:13
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 11:08
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, fishfry, 10:47
- Re: closed form for convolution of a^n with Fibonacci numbers, Roger Bagula, 10:40
- Re: infinity, stephen, 10:20
- Re: how to prove 1>0, A N Niel, 10:18
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., G. A. Edgar, 10:18
- Re: what makes it true?, Ittay Weiss, 10:18
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Eric Thurschwell, 10:15
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 10:11
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Eric Thurschwell, 10:00
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 09:57
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, Jim Spriggs, 09:56
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Eric Thurschwell, 09:49
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, José Carlos Santos, 09:48
- Re: sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 09:46
- Re: Why is it impossible to get analytically all rational, Narasimham, 09:46
- sin x / x tends to 1..., Darren J Wilkinson, 09:22
- matrix*vector = vector, Paminu, 09:20
- Re: How to get the distribution of this R.V., Rusty, 09:09
- Re: inductive proof question, ., 09:00
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, Noh, 08:58
- Re: Another Coxeter group question, Timothy Murphy, 08:57
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 08:47
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 08:44
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 08:16
- Re: The slug and the kilogram, Michael Orion, 08:15
- Re: what makes it true?, , 08:14
- On the factors of an odd perfect number, joseabdris, 08:11
- Re: FLT: a^n + b^n = c^n ==> 2 | abc, DGoncz, 07:46
- Re: Another Coxeter group question, Jim Heckman, 07:31
- Re: cantor's proof for set of transcendentals, Robert Low, 06:50
- Re: Gravity by Hartle - solutions manual, Robert Low, 06:35
- cantor's proof for set of transcendentals, woodland, 06:34
- Gravity by Hartle - solutions manual, Zinc Potterman, 06:28
- Re: Injective => bijective?, Paminu, 06:04
- How to get the distribution of this R.V., ycliao@xxxxxxxxx, 05:56
- Simple solution for a probability problem, Catalin Marinas, 05:43
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Lee Rudolph, 05:24
- Windows XP Pro $49.95 Windows XP, "Williams Rowell", 04:49
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 04:36
- Re: proof of (-1).a= -a, José Carlos Santos, 04:02
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Phil Carmody, 03:56
- Re: ISO prime factorization algorithm for n <= 10^10, Phil Carmody, 03:49
- Re: sums of distinct primes redux, Phil Carmody, 03:41
- proof of (-1).a= -a, woodland, 03:31
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 03:23
- FLT: a^n + b^n = c^n ==> 2 | abc, DGoncz, 03:17
- Visit 'We the Thinking', nathanhawking, 03:15
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 02:55
- Re: Physical interpretaion of -2*-3, Proginoskes, 02:10
- Re: union of two subspaces W1 and W1, William Elliot, 02:08
- Re: inductive proof question, Proginoskes, 02:04
- Re: Discrete Math, Proginoskes, 01:52
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:40
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:35
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 01:32
- Re: Number Sequence, Proginoskes, 01:08
- Re: Why is it impossible to get analytically all rational, Proginoskes, 01:06
- Re: what makes it true?, mzafrullah, 01:06
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, Chan-Ho Suh, 00:55
- Re: inductive proof question, William Elliot, 00:52
- inductive proof question, ., 00:34
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 00:18
- Re: 0^0, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
September 02, 2005
- Re: what makes it true?, Jumbie, 23:55
- Re: INFINITY Revisited, imaginatorium, 23:48
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 23:44
- Re: cofinite topology......, quasi, 23:43
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, Karl M. Bunday, 23:35
- Re: Alternative Goldbach?, quasi, 23:35
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, Karl M. Bunday, 23:35
- Re: INFINITY Revisited, stephen, 23:34
- Re: Aleph_2 as size of set of all real functions, David R Tribble, 23:31
- Re: topology questions, quasi, 23:24
- Re: how to prove 1>0, Ronald Bruck, 23:04
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 23:00
- Re: INFINITY Revisited, Dave Seaman, 22:59
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 22:58
- how to prove 1>0, woodland, 22:48
- Re: ISO prime factorization algorithm for n <= 10^10, Dik T. Winter, 22:30
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 22:12
- Re: infinity and zero, am i an alchemist...?, David W . Cantrell, 22:12
- Re: infinity and zero, am i an alchemist...?, William Elliot, 21:58
- Re: infinity, stephen, 21:57
- Re: cofinite topology......, Arturo Magidin, 21:56
- Re: cofinite topology......, William Elliot, 21:52
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 21:31
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Michael1, 21:30
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Timothy Little, 21:27
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Dik T. Winter, 21:23
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 21:07
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 20:43
- Re: INFINITY Revisited, Don Whitehurst, 20:42
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:38
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Herman Rubin, 20:34
- Re: what makes it true?, fishfry, 20:33
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 20:29
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Timothy Little, 20:19
- cofinite topology......, mina_world, 20:18
- Re: what makes it true?, lhlhsand, 20:11
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, David Ames, 20:06
- Re: union of two subspaces W1 and W1, Arturo Magidin, 20:05
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 20:01
- union of two subspaces W1 and W1, woodland, 19:56
- Re: what makes it true?, Timothy Little, 19:56
- Re: INFINITY Revisited, Don Whitehurst, 19:50
- Re: Aleph_2 as size of set of all real functions, Dave Seaman, 19:47
- Re: Aleph_2 as size of set of all real functions, Timothy Little, 19:43
- Re: what makes it true?, lhlhsand, 19:41
- Re: what makes it true?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:31
- Aleph_2 as size of set of all real functions, David R Tribble, 19:17
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:07
- Re: Geometry question, Timothy Little, 19:05
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Jeremy Boden, 19:05
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:02
- Re: what makes it true?, odin, 18:59
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 18:56
- Re: what makes it true?, Ittay Weiss, 18:38
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 18:37
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:28
- Re: what makes it true?, Ittay Weiss, 18:26
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:20
- Re: what makes it true?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:02
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 18:02
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:59
- Re: Physical interpretaion of -2*-3, Dirk Van de moortel, 17:58
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:41
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 17:38
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:34
- Re: Another Coxeter group question, , 17:14
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 16:44
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Virgil, 16:36
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, bill, 16:33
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, bill, 16:29
- Re: what makes it true?, Bart Goddard, 16:15
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:14
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:11
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:05
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:00
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., david petry, 15:54
- Re: Question about differential equation, Robert Israel, 15:53
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:53
- Re: Number Sequence, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 15:52
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., david petry, 15:48
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 15:40
- Why is it impossible to get analytically all rational, Narasimham, 15:39
- Re: what makes it true?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:33
- Re: what makes it true?, Androcles, 15:26
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 15:25
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 15:14
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 15:12
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 15:11
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 15:07
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:04
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:03
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 15:03
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 15:02
- Re: what makes it true?, odin, 14:58
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:57
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:54
- Re: F_sigma, Carl Parkes, 14:51
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:47
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:45
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:44
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:43
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:37
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 14:31
- Re: what makes it true?, Robert Low, 14:24
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 14:24
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:23
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:22
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:21
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:18
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:18
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 14:14
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:14
- Re: what makes it true?, Menyoung Lee, 14:11
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 14:06
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:05
- Re: what makes it true?, Jim Spriggs, 14:01
- Re: Discrete Math, Pubkeybreaker, 14:01
- Re: The slug and the kilogram, john_ramsden, 14:01
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:00
- Re: what makes it true?, Jumbie, 13:59
- Re: Alternative Goldbach?, Nameless, 13:56
- Re: what makes it true?, José Carlos Santos, 13:49
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 13:47
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:45
- Re: Physical interpretaion of -2*-3, Justin, 13:41
- what makes it true?, lhlhsand, 13:39
- Re: topology questions, W. Dale Hall, 13:39
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 13:39
- Re: simple rearrangement of a formula., James Brown, 13:37
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 13:37
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:36
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 13:35
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 13:33
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:31
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 13:22
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:22
- Re: Physical interpretaion of -2*-3, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:14
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:13
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 13:11
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 13:11
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 13:08
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 13:07
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 13:07
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 13:06
- Re: sums of distinct primes redux, Pubkeybreaker, 13:06
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:05
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:03
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 13:00
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:00
- Re: Geometry question, john_ramsden, 12:50
- Re: 0^0, Arturo Magidin, 12:45
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:43
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:41
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 12:40
- Re: Physical interpretaion of -2*-3, Jim Spriggs, 12:39
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:39
- Re: Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo, Androcles, 12:38
- Re: ISO prime factorization algorithm for n <= 10^10, Phil Carmody, 12:36
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:33
- Re: Physical interpretaion of -2*-3, Jumbie, 12:32
- Re: Discrete Math, yagmai, 12:32
- Re: infinity and zero, am i an alchemist...?, David W . Cantrell, 12:30
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:28
- Re: Is one braid equivalent to some unknown positive braid?, Lee Rudolph, 12:16
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:09
- Physical interpretaion of -2*-3, anand_bheemaraju, 12:08
- Re: Poincare Duality, Lee Rudolph, 12:03
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:54
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 11:54
- How to express a combed braid as the product of generators of An?, zeroRefrainFromSpamtype, 11:53
- Is one braid equivalent to some unknown positive braid?, zeroKeepYourSpamToYourselftype, 11:47
- Re: New proof of Four Color Theorem, icahit, 11:43
- infinity and zero, am i an alchemist...?, eestath, 11:35
- Re: Geometry question, Rick Decker, 11:33
- Re: Probability of a complete set., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 11:27
- Re: Pure-cardinal approach *is* possible! (was: Mathematical concepts), Herman Rubin, 11:22
- Re: Discrete Math, Arturo Magidin, 11:06
- Re: Number Sequence, Rick Decker, 11:06
- Re: infinity, Jiri Lebl, 11:04
- Re: relation, Arturo Magidin, 11:04
- Re: Number Sequence, Randy Poe, 11:01
- Re: Number Sequence, temptony, 11:01
- relation, yagmai, 10:58
- Discrete Math, yagmai, 10:53
- Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo, Jim Ferry, 10:49
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, Robert J. Kolker, 10:39
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, Hanford Carr, 10:33
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:20
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, quasi, 10:09
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:07
- Re: Number Sequence, Artur, 10:00
- Re: Alternative Goldbach?, Norm Dresner, 09:57
- Re: Poincare Duality, Lee Rudolph, 09:56
- Re: 0^0, J.M., 09:53
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, markwh04, 09:53
- Re: The Measure of Beauty Created in Nature, temptony, 09:52
- Re: The Measure of Beauty Created in Nature, john_ramsden, 09:49
- Re: The Measure of Beauty Created in Nature, Lee Rudolph, 09:45
- Re: Number Sequence, mathedman, 09:44
- Re: Sobolev space question, David C . Ullrich, 09:41
- Re: The slug and the kilogram, Michael Orion, 09:33
- Re: Geometry question, briggs, 09:30
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Randy Poe, 09:29
- Re: The Measure of Beauty Created in Nature, G. A. Edgar, 09:25
- Re: Geometry question, Randy Poe, 09:12
- Poincare Duality, singau, 09:09
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 09:01
- Re: Sobolev space question, David C . Ullrich, 09:00
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 08:51
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 08:51
- Ramanujan and 3^3+4^3+5^3 = 6^3, titus_piezas, 08:49
- Geometry question, Simon Kissane, 08:46
- Re: simple rearrangement of a formula., Pubkeybreaker, 08:46
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 08:44
- Re: A Functional Equation, Maury Barbato, 08:43
- The best web hosting packages at the best prices!!, eb1024@xxxxxxxxx, 08:34
- Re: functional analysis L^p norms, David C . Ullrich, 08:24
- Re: Existence of function, David C . Ullrich, 08:21
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Martin Shobe, 07:50
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, anand_bheemaraju, 06:19
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, anand_bheemaraju, 06:02
- Re: Probability of a complete set., Binesh Bannerjee, 05:28
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 05:15
- Re: recondite herculean style puzzle, Dante Alighieri, 05:01
- making a graph K-partite (multi-partite), tzuchien . chiu, 05:01
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 04:54
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Timothy Little, 04:39
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, David Kastrup, 04:38
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 04:33
- Re: Probability of a complete set., Torsten Hennig, 04:10
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 04:09
- Re: Solution for positive integeres, Narasimham, 04:01
- Re: 0^0, Timothy Little, 03:56
- Re: Probability of a complete set., Robert Israel, 03:45
- Re: 0^0, Christian Bau, 03:44
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 03:41
- Re: What does Gödel's Incompleteness mean for the Working Mathematician?, Keith Ramsay, 03:26
- Probability of a complete set., Binesh Bannerjee, 03:25
- The Measure of Beauty Created in Nature, harunyahya2011, 03:25
- Re: New proof of Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 03:01
- Re: Number Sequence, Proginoskes, 02:52
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 02:48
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 02:44
- Re: 0^0, Helmut Richter, 02:40
- Re: Alternative Goldbach?, quasi, 02:34
- Re: f(x)=a^b, Proginoskes, 02:26
- Re: Number Sequence, Solbek, 02:21
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, bill, 02:19
- Re: Advanced linear algebra Text book, quasi, 02:08
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:44
- Re: f(x)=a^b, quasi, 01:39
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Virgil, 01:39
- Re: topology questions, quasi, 01:38
- Re: Please help me solve this DE, Virgil, 01:23
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 01:23
- Re: Advanced linear algebra Text book, Kira Yamato, 01:21
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 01:19
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 01:18
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 01:04
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Martin Shobe, 00:36
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, Gerry Myerson, 00:21
September 01, 2005
- Re: 2x2 MATRIX quadratic equation, Robert Israel, 23:49
- Re: What is nonselfadjoint theoy, Robert Israel, 23:46
- Re: Pure-cardinal approach *is* possible! (was: Mathematical concepts), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 23:30
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 23:27
- Re: Advanced linear algebra Text book, Igor Khavkine, 23:22
- Re: Spectral theorem of nonsymmetric matrix, Igor Khavkine, 23:18
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, anand_bheemaraju, 23:16
- Re: 2x2 MATRIX quadratic equation, JohnCreighton_, 23:16
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, anand_bheemaraju, 23:10
- Re: 2x2 MATRIX quadratic equation, Rouben Rostamian, 23:10
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 22:54
- Re: infinity, William Hughes, 22:52
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 22:50
- Re: Another Coxeter group question, James Dolan, 22:45
- What is nonselfadjoint theoy, Tony012, 22:33
- Re: New proof of Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 22:32
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:18
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, anand_bheemaraju, 22:17
- Re: 2x2 MATRIX quadratic equation, Robert Israel, 22:15
- Advanced linear algebra Text book, Tony, 22:06
- Re: topology questions, Ron Sperber, 22:01
- Re: Coordinate Systems And Total Information, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:58
- Re: Existence of function, Dave Seaman, 21:56
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, anand_bheemaraju, 21:54
- Re: jars and marbles again..., Jim Burns, 21:25
- topology questions, ysuzuki2, 21:03
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 21:01
- Re: Please help me solve this DE, Brablo, 21:01
- Spectral theorem of nonsymmetric matrix, Tony, 20:49
- Re: Tools and software to help new math student?, me, 20:47
- Spectral theorem of nonsymmetric matrix, Tony, 20:27
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Dik T. Winter, 20:25
- Re: New proof of Four Color Theorem, bill, 20:20
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 20:12
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., cbrown, 20:02
- Re: 0^0, Dik T. Winter, 19:59
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 19:58
- Re: 2x2 MATRIX quadratic equation, mmeron, 19:57
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, bill, 19:55
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 19:50
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 19:38
- Re: 0^0, Dave Seaman, 19:36
- Re: Product of two derivations, Bill Dubuque, 19:34
- Re: Alternative Goldbach?, Gerry Myerson, 19:22
- Re: f(x)=a^b, Proginoskes, 19:15
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, Gerry Myerson, 19:13
- Re: 2x2 MATRIX quadratic equation, JohnCreighton_, 19:07
- Re: simple rearrangement of a formula., James Brown, 19:03
- Chaotic solutions of PDEs, Gorodon Freeman, 19:01
- Re: simple rearrangement of a formula., Proginoskes, 18:52
- sums of distinct primes redux, Eric Thurschwell, 18:50
- Re: f(x)=a^b, Pubkeybreaker, 18:46
- Re: f(x)=a^b, Pubkeybreaker, 18:44
- Re: 2x2 MATRIX quadratic equation, Rouben Rostamian, 18:42
- Re: f(x)=a^b, Proginoskes, 18:41
- Re: 0^0, Nath Rao, 18:39
- Re: New proof of Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 18:29
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 18:26
- Re: 2x2 MATRIX quadratic equation, Ray Koopman, 18:23
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., david petry, 18:19
- Re: derivatives as a limit of continuous functions, Robert Israel, 18:19
- Re: infinity, snapdragon31, 18:14
- Re: 0^0, john, 18:14
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., david petry, 18:12
- Sobolev space question, don, 18:05
- 2x2 MATRIX quadratic equation, Finance Incarnate, 18:02
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 18:01
- Re: jars and marbles again..., Robert Israel, 17:56
- Re: 0^0, J.M., 17:55
- simple rearrangement of a formula., James Brown, 17:54
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:51
- f(x)=a^b, john, 17:50
- Re: infinity, snapdragon31, 17:46
- Re: 0^0, john, 17:39
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 17:34
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, man_in_black529, 17:30
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 17:29
- Re: 0^0, john, 17:27
- Sum of reciprocals of continued fraction of harmonic numbers, Leroy Quet, 17:21
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 17:19
- ONLINE MEDICATION? easy !, "Gunzberg", 17:16
- Mystery Permutation, Leroy Quet, 17:11
- Leonard Susskind's Black Hole book Comment 3, Jack Sarfatti, 17:11
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 17:11
- Re: infinity, Jiri Lebl, 17:03
- Re: A Functional Equation, Ioannis, 17:02
- derivatives as the limit of a sequence of continuous functions, Artur, 17:00
- Re: A Functional Equation, Ioannis, 17:00
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 16:58
- Re: infinity, stephen, 16:49
- derivatives as a limit of continuous functions, Artur, 16:46
- Re: infinity, snapdragon31, 16:42
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, Ronald Bruck, 16:36
- Re: A Functional Equation, Ronald Bruck, 16:34
- Re: Tools and software to help new math student?, Jeremy Boden, 16:31
- Re: Another Coxeter group question, Jim Heckman, 16:30
- Re: 0^0, Dave Seaman, 16:24
- Re: A Functional Equation, Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen, 16:15
- Re: A Functional Equation, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:15
- Strange sets of numbers, Daniel McCarty, 16:09
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 16:03
- Re: New proof of Four Color Theorem, bill, 15:57
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 15:40
- Re: Study of Pure Mathematics (Help Wanted), porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:40
- Re: A Functional Equation, NotP, 15:30
- Re: 0^0, Jonathan Hoyle, 15:18
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 15:14
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 15:14
- Re: A Functional Equation, A N Niel, 15:11
- Re: A Functional Equation, Virgil, 15:02
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 15:00
- Re: 0^0, Androcles, 14:54
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:50
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, bill, 14:41
- Re: jars and marbles again..., matt271829-news, 14:32
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:22
- Re: jars and marbles again..., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 14:21
- Re: jars and marbles again..., matt271829-news, 14:21
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:08
- Re: jars and marbles again..., matt271829-news, 14:06
- weil pairing, brain, 14:01
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 14:00
- A Functional Equation, Maury Barbato, 13:56
- Re: Coordinate Systems And Total Information, Uncle Al, 13:55
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, Robert Israel, 13:53
- Re: functional analysis L^p norms, David C. Ullrich, 13:50
- Re: Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, David Kastrup, 13:49
- Re: 4D Angular Coordinate System-, JEMebius, 13:49
- Re: Question about differential equation, Robert Israel, 13:46
- Doubt - Proof of Four Color Theorem, anand_bheemaraju, 13:46
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, David C. Ullrich, 13:43
- Re: What is the dual of l^\infty ?, David C. Ullrich, 13:38
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 13:32
- Re: jars and marbles again..., Robert Israel, 13:24
- Re: Coordinate Systems And Total Information, Dirk Van de moortel, 13:14
- Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 12:50
- Re: Pythagorean Quads, Quints, ..., reriker, 12:48
- Re: Pythagorean / Fibonacci Progressions, reriker, 12:47
- Re: The Structure of Primitive Pythagorean Progressions, reriker, 12:41
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:41
- Re: Two new conjectures about primes, scattered, 12:40
- Re: 0^0, Ben Crain, 12:17
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, Randy Poe, 12:16
- Re: Coordinate Systems And Total Information, Mike, 12:14
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, N. Silver, 12:09
- Re: NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, Torkel Franzen, 12:08
- Re: Coordinate Systems And Total Information, Dirk Van de moortel, 12:07
- Re: Coordinate Systems And Total Information, Solbek, 12:05
- Re: infinity, stephen, 12:03
- NEWS FLASH: Flaw found in ZF axioms, Jennifer Anderson, 12:01
- Re: Congruence with division, Jim Weisert, 11:55
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 11:54
- Coordinate Systems And Total Information, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 11:53
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 11:51
- 4D Angular Coordinate System, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com, 11:51
- Re: functional analysis L^p norms, Volker Boie, 11:47
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 11:43
- Re: 0^0, Ben Crain, 11:37
- Re: 0^0, Ben Crain, 11:35
- Re: infinity and intuition, David R Tribble, 11:35
- Re: 0^0, Jonathan Hoyle, 11:34
- Re: product & sum of roots, computer, 11:10
- Re: 0^0, Nathan, 11:09
- Re: Two new conjectures about primes, Patrick Capelle, 10:49
- Question about differential equation, claudiahauff, 10:47
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 10:40
- Alternative Goldbach?, Norm Dresner, 10:40
- Re: 0^0, Jonathan Hoyle, 10:12
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Jonathan Hoyle, 09:57
- Re: 0^0, Dave Seaman, 09:51
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 09:36
- Re: Adjointness of Free Modules, Marc Olschok, 09:35
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 09:18
- Re: 0^0, Risto Lankinen, 09:10
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 09:04
- Re: Congruence with division, Ulrich Sondermann, 09:03
- Re: jars and marbles again..., matt271829-news, 08:54
- Re: 0^0, Ulrich Sondermann, 08:53
- Re: Product of two derivations, Robert Low, 08:32
- Re: Study of Pure Mathematics (Help Wanted), DeltaOne, 08:24
- Re: product & sum of roots, Robert Low, 08:22
- Re: infinity, Martin Shobe, 08:05
- Re: Need help in calculus, DeltaOne, 08:02
- Re: infinity, Martin Shobe, 08:01
- Re: jars and marbles again..., Torsten Hennig, 08:00
- Re: infinity and intuition, Jesse F. Hughes, 07:46
- Re: infinity, Martin Shobe, 07:28
- Re: product & sum of roots, computer, 07:18
- Re: jars and marbles again..., matt271829-news, 07:13
- Re: product & sum of roots, Torsten Hennig, 07:10
- Re: product & sum of roots, Pubkeybreaker, 07:09
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 07:06
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 06:53
- Adjointness of Free Modules, Lukas Horosiewicz, 06:38
- Re: Existence of function, David C . Ullrich, 06:31
- product & sum of roots, computer, 06:22
- Re: Congruence with division, Dave Seaman, 05:35
- Re: 0^0, Dave Seaman, 05:26
- Re: infinity, abhishikt, 05:15
- Re: 0^0, Richard Mathar, 04:51
- Re: jars and marbles again..., Richard Mathar, 04:13
- Re: What kind of nxn matrix has less than n linearly independent eigenvectors?, , 03:52
- Re: 0^0, Proginoskes, 03:18
- Re: Product of two derivations, Robert Israel, 03:13
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 02:49
- Re: 0^0, David Kastrup, 02:47
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, Darko Aleksic, 02:41
- Re: Product of two derivations, Someone, 02:19
- Lowly composite numbers, w . taylor, 02:11
- Re: Product of two derivations, Ted Hwa, 02:06
- How Were Those Tables Computed?, w . taylor, 02:05
- Re: jars and marbles again..., Robert Israel, 01:42
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 01:11
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 01:11
- Re: Minimization of a pointwise maximum, Igor Khavkine, 01:09
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 01:03
- Re: Congruence with division, Virgil, 00:35
- Re: 0^0, Ben Crain, 00:33
- Product of two derivations, Someone, 00:33
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 00:21
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 00:21
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Ross A. Finlayson, 00:11
- Re: 0^0, Ulrich Sondermann, 00:04
August 31, 2005
- Re: Congruence with division, Ulrich Sondermann, 23:57
- Re: infinity, stephen, 23:25
- Re: 0^0, Dave Seaman, 23:25
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Martin Shobe, 23:17
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Richard Ulrich, 23:15
- Re: infinity, stephen, 23:06
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 23:05
- 0^0, Ben Crain, 22:57
- Re: infinity, stephen, 22:44
- Re: Existence of function, agapito6314, 22:24
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 22:13
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:09
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:06
- Re: infinity and intuition, Virgil, 22:00
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 21:54
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:49
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:47
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Dik T. Winter, 21:46
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 21:35
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:34
- Re: infinity, Darko Aleksic, 21:31
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 21:29
- Re: infinity, Jesse F. Hughes, 21:28
- Re: infinity, Darko Aleksic, 21:27
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:25
- Re: INFINITY Revisited, Jesse F. Hughes, 21:10
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Ross A. Finlayson, 21:10
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:07
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 21:03
- Re: number sequence, Russ, 20:57
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, William Elliot, 20:51
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 20:48
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:45
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Rick Decker, 20:44
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 20:42
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Rick Decker, 20:42
- Re: recondite herculean style puzzle, Dante Alighieri, 20:39
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 20:39
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 20:34
- Re: Congruence with division, Rick Decker, 20:33
- Re: jars and marbles again..., matt271829-news, 20:32
- Re: Existence of function, fishfry, 20:31
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 20:29
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Jesse F. Hughes, 20:26
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 20:23
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 20:22
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:21
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 20:21
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:18
- Re: really easy trig question, ., 20:17
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 20:14
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Gerry Myerson, 20:14
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Gerry Myerson, 20:11
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:09
- Re: jars and marbles again..., bill, 20:07
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 20:07
- Re: calculating the centroid, Daniel W. Johnson, 19:57
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 19:54
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 19:51
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 19:48
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 19:43
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:33
- Re: Existence of function, Dave Seaman, 19:29
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:27
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:09
- functional analysis L^p norms, sigurgurd_jack, 19:08
- Re: What kind of nxn matrix has less than n linearly independent eigenvectors?, Robert Israel, 19:07
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:07
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 19:04
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:57
- Existence of function, agapito6314, 18:54
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 18:53
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:46
- Re: Injective => bijective?, quasi, 18:44
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:44
- Re: Lowly composite numbers, Robert Israel, 18:34
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:24
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 18:22
- Re: Cross Product: Was Re: really easy trig question, matt271829-news, 18:21
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 18:18
- Re: Cross Product: Was Re: really easy trig question, Ken Pledger, 18:15
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:12
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:11
- Re: infinity, Robert Low, 18:07
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:06
- Re: Cross Product: Was Re: really easy trig question, Robert Low, 18:05
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:59
- Re: jars and marbles again..., Robert Israel, 17:59
- Re: Cross Product: Was Re: really easy trig question, matt271829-news, 17:52
- Re: How to reduce this equation to that equation?, boi, 17:51
- Re: Congruence with division, Ulrich Sondermann, 17:50
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 17:48
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:47
- Re: Solution for positive integeres, snapdragon31, 17:45
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 17:45
- Re: jars and marbles again..., Robert Israel, 17:41
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:37
- Re: infinity and intuition, Dave Seaman, 17:37
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 17:32
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:30
- Re: infinity and intuition, Robert Low, 17:28
- How to reduce this equation to that equation?, kiki, 17:25
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 17:22
- Re: Distributed calculation of mean vector, mathman, 17:20
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 17:17
- Cross Product: Was Re: really easy trig question, Proginoskes, 17:13
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:07
- Re: infinity and intuition, David R Tribble, 17:05
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:01
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 17:01
- Re: change of variable in multiple integrations..., Proginoskes, 16:59
- Re: infinity, stephen, 16:58
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:54
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:53
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 16:53
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, Roman B. Binder, 16:53
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:50
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:49
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:43
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:37
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:37
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:35
- Re: What is the dual of l^\infty ?, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:34
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:33
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 16:33
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., david petry, 16:28
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:26
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 16:23
- Re: number sequence, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:16
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:15
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 16:11
- Re: infinity, stephen, 16:01
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 15:59
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:56
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 15:52
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:51
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:48
- Re: infinity and intuition, David R Tribble, 15:48
- Re: Please help me solve this DE, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 15:48
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:47
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:46
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:44
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 15:44
- Re: Injective => bijective?, Robert J. Kolker, 15:43
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:43
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:39
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 15:38
- Re: Injective => bijective?, Arturo Magidin, 15:38
- Injective => bijective?, Paminu, 15:35
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:34
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:34
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:34
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:32
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:28
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 15:25
- Re: infinity, stephen, 15:23
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:14
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:13
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Richard Henry, 15:12
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:11
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 15:08
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:05
- Re: infinity and intuition, Robert Low, 15:04
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 15:02
- Re: infinity, imaginatorium, 15:02
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:55
- Re: infinity, Robert Low, 14:53
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:51
- Re: infinity and intuition, Robert Low, 14:51
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:46
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Rick Decker, 14:38
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:36
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 14:35
- Re: For non-diagonalizable matrix A, how do you compute exp(t*A)?, ArtflDodgr, 14:34
- Re: Continuity of inverse of continuous function, Arturo Magidin, 14:32
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 14:29
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 14:28
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 14:22
- Re: What kind of nxn matrix has less than n linearly independent eigenvectors?, Robert M . Mazo, 14:20
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:20
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:16
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:10
- Re: Congruence with division, Keith A. Lewis, 14:03
- Re: infinity, stephen, 14:01
- Re: Need help to calculate ELLIPSES., Robert Israel, 14:01
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 14:00
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 13:58
- Re: Multiplicative Seminorms, Robert Low, 13:57
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 13:53
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 13:47
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 13:45
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 13:41
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 13:41
- Re: infinity and intuition, Dave Seaman, 13:41
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 13:26
- Re: Continuity of inverse of continuous function, Narasimham, 13:22
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 13:21
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:19
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 13:19
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 13:13
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:12
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:07
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 13:07
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 13:06
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 13:04
- Re: jars and marbles again..., Keith A. Lewis, 13:03
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 13:02
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:59
- Re: Continuity of inverse of continuous function, Michael Stemper, 12:56
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:55
- Re: Continuity of inverse of continuous function, Michael Stemper, 12:54
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Jim Spriggs, 12:52
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 12:51
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:50
- Re: infinity, stephen, 12:47
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:38
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:37
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:33
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:30
- Re: infinity, stephen, 12:25
- Re: Minimization of a pointwise maximum, astanoff, 12:23
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:22
- Re: infinity, Jiri Lebl, 12:18
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 12:18
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:09
- Re: really easy trig question, matt271829-news, 12:08
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 12:08
- Re: infinity, Jiri Lebl, 12:07
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:53
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:53
- Re: jars and marbles again..., Torsten Hennig, 11:43
- Re: optimisation problem!!!, The Qurqirish Dragon, 11:37
- Re: infinity and intuition, David R Tribble, 11:36
- Re: infinity and intuition, David R Tribble, 11:26
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Rick Decker, 11:21
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:17
- Re: Odd twin composite challenge!, Dan, 11:14
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Jonathan Hoyle, 11:07
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:06
- Re: Looking for an algorithm to accomplish the following, fadi, 11:05
- Re: Multiplicative Seminorms, barr, 11:01
- Re: number sequence, mathedman, 11:00
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 11:00
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 10:59
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Dik T. Winter, 10:59
- Re: Looking for an algorithm to accomplish the following, fadi, 10:58
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 10:55
- Re: Looking for an algorithm to accomplish the following, fadi, 10:55
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Dik T. Winter, 10:52
- Re: optimisation problem!!!, Puppet_Sock, 10:50
- Re: optimisation problem!!!, Puppet_Sock, 10:50
- Re: What is the dual of l^\infty ?, G. A. Edgar, 10:47
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Dik T. Winter, 10:47
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:46
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:44
- Re: Multiplicative Seminorms, G. A. Edgar, 10:44
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:40
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 10:24
- Re: Two new conjectures about primes, scattered, 10:20
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:18
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Ross A. Finlayson, 10:17
- Multiplicative Seminorms, Maury Barbato, 10:15
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 10:12
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 10:05
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Randy Poe, 10:02
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 10:02
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:52
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:48
- Re: jars and marbles again..., boi, 09:42
- Re: infinity, aeo6, 09:23
- Re: Congruence with division, scattered, 09:17
- Re: Congruence with division, David Kastrup, 09:15
- Re: jars and marbles again..., Torsten Hennig, 09:10
- Re: really easy trig question, The Qurqirish Dragon, 09:02
- Re: really easy trig question, matt271829-news, 08:50
- Congruence with division, Ulrich Sondermann, 08:50
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Carl Parkes, 08:43
- Re: jars and marbles again..., boi, 08:41
- Re: really easy trig question, Phil Nicholson, 08:36
- Re: What is the dual of l^\infty ?, David C . Ullrich, 08:28
- Re: really easy trig question, ., 08:20
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Art Kendall, 08:06
- Re: infinity, Martin Shobe, 07:46
- Re: Two new conjectures about primes, Patrick Capelle, 07:44
- Re: Matrixproduct or scalar multiplied with matrix?, Paminu, 07:23
- Two new conjectures about primes, Patrick Capelle, 07:22
- Re: Please help me solve this DE, matt271829-news, 07:21
- Re: really easy trig question, matt271829-news, 07:16
- really easy trig question, ., 07:09
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 06:53
- Re: Solution for positive integeres, Narasimham, 06:42
- Re: jars and marbles again..., Torsten Hennig, 06:30
- optimisation problem!!!, jib jib, 06:22
- Re: Lowly composite numbers, Hauke Reddmann, 06:18
- Re: Differentiation with traces and matrices, vijayasarathi.j@xxxxxxxxx, 05:37
- Re: Collection of formels ?, Juel, 05:19
- Re: Need help to calculate ELLIPSES., john_ramsden, 05:15
- Re: Collection of formels ?, Juel, 05:15
- jars and marbles again..., boi, 05:11
- Re: Linear matrix transformation, Timothy Little, 05:10
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Timothy Little, 05:01
- Re: Need help to calculate ELLIPSES., Narasimham, 04:52
- Re: infinity, Robert Low, 04:38
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Androcles, 04:37
- Distributed calculation of mean vector, h2g, 04:35
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Androcles, 04:32
- Re: Matrixproduct or scalar multiplied with matrix?, Torsten Hennig, 04:26
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Timothy Little, 04:04
- Re: Looking for an algorithm to accomplish the following, Philippe 92, 03:38
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, William Elliot, 03:37
- Re: infinity, Martin Semerád, 03:29
- Re: calculating the centroid, Hans-Henning . Gabriel, 03:24
- Matrixproduct or scalar multiplied with matrix?, Paminu, 03:19
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Gerry Myerson, 03:00
- Re: odds of seeing total eclipse from the eye of a hurricane, kendo, 02:59
- Some cute divergent series., w . taylor, 02:56
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, William Elliot, 02:49
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, Proginoskes, 02:44
- Re: Looking for an algorithm to accomplish the following, kendo, 02:15
- Re: Need help to calculate ELLIPSES., Michael Jørgensen, 01:53
- Re: number sequence, Anon, 01:27
- What is the dual of l^\infty ?, tommi . hoynalanmaa, 01:26
- Re: FFT HELP PLEASE, Sarah, 00:44
- Viagra - LOW price!, "Richard K. Lee", 00:44
- Re: recondite herculean style puzzle, Dante Alighieri, 00:40
- Re: how to compute this fast using paper and pencil?, Bill Dubuque, 00:37
- Need help to calculate ELLIPSES., jeuro, 00:30
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:25
- Re: Collection of formels ?, Karl, 00:24
- Re: Collection of formels ?, Karl, 00:01
August 30, 2005
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Virgil, 23:58
- Re: Proof of Zorn Lemma, Ronald Bruck, 23:55
- Re: number sequence, Virgil, 23:49
- Re: FFT HELP PLEASE, Randy Poe, 23:30
- Re: Cardinality of Real Numbers, Ross A. Finlayson, 23:14
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:54
- Re: FFT HELP PLEASE, Daniel McLaury, 22:49
- Re: FFT HELP PLEASE, gene . ressler, 22:47
- Re: number sequence, quasi, 22:44
- Re: Looking for an algorithm to accomplish the following, fadi, 22:27
- Re: recondite herculean style puzzle, Robert J. Kolker, 22:23
- Re: Differentiation with traces and matrices, Sudarshan Raghunathan, 22:17
- Re: Please help me solve this DE, Robert Israel, 22:16
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:14
- Re: Sudoku, r.e.s., 22:13
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Bob LeChevalier, 22:08
- Re: Bedeviled by the .999~ = 1 "debate", Minus XVII, 22:07
- Re: Tools and software to help new math student?, me, 22:01
- Re: recondite herculean style puzzle, Rouben Rostamian, 21:58
- Re: How to build a k-partite graph?, Proginoskes, 21:58
- Re: New proof of Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 21:54
- Re: New proof of Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes, 21:50
- recondite herculean style puzzle, Dante Alighieri, 21:20
- Re: Looking for an algorithm to accomplish the following, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 20:59
- Re: Looking for an algorithm to accomplish the following, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:52
- Re: number sequence, snapdragon31, 20:27
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 20:23
- Re: number sequence, Gottfried Helms, 20:08
- Re: Sudoku, Ulysse Keller, 20:07
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 20:03
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:59
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 19:56
- Re: Lowly composite numbers, Gerry Myerson, 19:55
- Re: Goldbach & Riemann, fiesh, 19:55
- Re: infinity, David R Tribble, 19:54
- Re: infinity, David Kastrup, 19:53
- FFT HELP PLEASE, Sarah, 19:53
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:52
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 19:52
- Re: number sequence, Arturo Magidin, 19:49
- Re: Minimization of a pointwise maximum, Hans Mittelmann, 19:42
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Rick Decker, 19:41
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., Dik T. Winter, 19:39
- number sequence, Russ, 19:32
- TO's quantifier dyslexia rears its ugly head again, Virgil, 19:29
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:29
- GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS, ACE, 19:24
- Re: infinity, Dik T. Winter, 19:23
- Re: calculating the centroid, Rusty, 19:22
- Re: infinity, stephen, 19:20
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:15
- Re: infinity, stephen, 19:13
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, Gerry Myerson, 19:10
- Re: Goldbach & Riemann, Timothy Murphy, 19:09
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 19:04
- Looking for an algorithm to accomplish the following, fadi, 19:03
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 19:01
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:53
- Re: Simple Treatment of Poisson Distribution?, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:51
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:46
- Re: Minimization of a pointwise maximum, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:45
- Re: Differentiation with traces and matrices, Timothy Murphy, 18:42
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:37
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:32
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:24
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 18:24
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 18:24
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:10
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 18:09
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 18:03
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 18:03
- Re: Simple Treatment of Poisson Distribution?, Anon, 17:55
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, matt271829-news, 17:53
- Re: infinity, stephen, 17:48
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 17:39
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 17:34
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 17:21
- Re: How Were Those Tables Computed?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:20
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 17:18
- Simple Treatment of Poisson Distribution?, wheierman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:16
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 17:11
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 17:09
- Re: infinity, stephen, 17:04
- Re: infinity, stephen, 17:02
- Re: Bring Math Arguments against this FERMAT LAST THEOREM PROOF, george ghiata, 16:59
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., cbrown, 16:52
- Re: How to build a k-partite graph?, bill, 16:50
- Re: infinity, Daryl McCullough, 16:49
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:46
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:43
- Re: Please help me solve this DE, matt271829-news, 16:37
- Re: Odd twin composite challenge!, snapdragon31, 16:37
- Re: infinity, Virgil, 16:35
- Re: Han's startling new set theory., cbrown, 16:33
- Re: infinity, Randy Poe, 16:31
- Re: least squares problem, gwh, 16:27
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 16:23
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, Cary Kittrell, 16:13
- Re: Standard Deviation of PISA, jacobisrael, 16:02
Privacy Policy