sci.math
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: number theory as a Physical theory?

Subject: Re: number theory as a Physical theory?
From: Lee Rudolph
Date: 30 Jul 2005 15:51:18 -0400
Newsgroups: sci.math, sci.physics
"Edward Green" <spamspamspam3@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>Lefty wrote:
>
>> Einstein's Relativity is interesting because it uses independent frames of
>> reference w/respect to motion. How can you do this with numbers ? How to
>> think of a space which has no geometric origin, but still has all the nice
>> properties of R(n) ?
>
>Euclidean space?
>
>Unless I am mistaken, Euclidean space has no preferred origin.

You are not mistaken, but many people are, and persistently make
the error of taste and judgment of identifying the vectorspace
R^n (or R(n) as Lefty writes it) with the affine space E_n, which
they then call Euclidean space.  Of course Euclid's lines, planes,
and space only become affine spaces (of dimensions 1, 2, and 3,
respectively) upon interpretation--but they can only become 
vectorspaces upon *mis*interpretation.

Followups removed from sci.physics.

Lee Rudolph 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy