sci.math
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: arguing with idiots

Subject: Re: arguing with idiots
From: Dave Rusin
Date: 30 Jul 2005 18:30:24 GMT
Newsgroups: sci.math
In article <85y87oyx7f.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
David Kastrup  <dak@xxxxxxx> writes:
> Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Karl M. Bunday <kmbunday@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>>> I like to read the replies to the cranks because reading serious
>>> mathematicians explaining errors of logic is educational.

>> Surely not after the umpteenth explanation? 

> Oh, there are educational strokes of genius from time to time, things
> where you say "well, they just _have_ to understand it the way it is
> explained now".

Genius, yes -- of the Will Rogers variety. 
The only thing that keeps me from killfiling whole threads is the
promise of some great wit.

"BN pairs", f'rinstance.

dave

To speak algebraically: Mr. Mathews is execrable but Mr. Channing is
(x+1)ecrable.
   - Edgar Allen Poe, describing two writers.
     quoted in Clifton Fadiman's "Fantasia Mathematica",

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy