|
|
Zim Olson wrote:
> Every Set of components possesses it's corresponding non components.
> Every component of a set can be looked at as possessing a
> functionality, and also it's corresponding non component or
> corresponding non functionality or corresponding null component(s).
Word salad. And it it served without dressing. What does functionality
mean in this context?
Bob Kolker
Zim here:
Any item also has a event. And Item(s) and Event(s) as far as I am concerned,
and thus each "item" of a set possesses Functionality.
Zim Olson
http://www.zimmathematics.com
>
|
|