| Subject: | Re: number theory as a Physical theory? |
|---|---|
| From: | Robert Kolker |
| Date: | Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:41:57 -0400 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.math, sci.physics |
Jaime Gaspar wrote: I think that non-euclidean geometry is obtained "dropping" one of the Euclide's axioms. So, I would guess that the analog of non-euclidean geometries, to out "conventional" number theory, would be obtained by "dropping" one axiom. There are several non-euclidean geometries. In one such, there are no parallel lines. In another (hyperbolic) one can draw more that one line parallel to a given line through a point external to the given line. Bob Kolker |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Comment on math/0507611, David C . Ullrich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Robert Kolker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Jaime Gaspar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, G.E. Ivey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |