sci.math (date)
July 30, 2005
- Re: euclidean distance question, quasi, 19:26
- Re: Troubling combinatorics, matt271829-news, 17:34
- Re: I am so sad., David Kastrup, 17:33
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:30
- Re: Troubling combinatorics, matt271829-news, 17:22
- Re: modeling courtship as a sequential game, David Kastrup, 17:21
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, Lars Kecke, 17:20
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Lefty, 17:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 17:18
- Re: Noetherian rings, bodinsoul, 17:07
- Re: Rational numbers and Group Theory, quasi, 17:04
- Re: Groups and Inverse order, Virgil, 17:03
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Lee Rudolph, 16:55
- Re: Rational numbers and Group Theory, Virgil, 16:55
- Re: Groups and Inverse order, Paul Sperry, 16:55
- Re: I am so sad., double d, 16:53
- Re: modeling courtship as a sequential game, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:37
- Re: Help with Integral, Andreas Dieckmann, 16:24
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Lefty, 16:13
- Re: euclidean distance question, quasi, 16:08
- Re: linear regression with truncated data, Rod, 15:52
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Lee Rudolph, 15:51
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Lefty, 15:44
- Re: Generalized series, William Elliot, 15:40
- Re: euclidean distance question, asdf, 15:39
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, Edward Green, 15:27
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, J. Horta, 15:23
- Re: euclidean distance question, quasi, 15:22
- Shuttle Discovery Crew Drop Naseem Off At The Moon, naseemonthemoon, 14:58
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:48
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Edward Green, 14:46
- Re: Groups and Inverse order, J Polák, 14:44
- linear regression with truncated data, Tom Claessens, 14:40
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 14:32
- Re: arguing with idiots, Dave Rusin, 14:30
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, Gregory L. Hansen, 14:30
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Virgil, 14:25
- Re: [Help] How to find the minima of a function like f(x,y,z,w) = max{|x-y|,|x-z|,|x-w|,|y-z|,|y-w|,|z-w|}, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:24
- Re: Rational numbers and Group Theory, Dave Rusin, 14:23
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, Zim Olson, 14:19
- Re: arguing with idiots, David Kastrup, 14:18
- Groups and Inverse order, ADH, 14:03
- Re: Rational numbers and Group Theory, Lee Rudolph, 14:01
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Tony, 13:57
- Re: euclidean distance question, asdf, 13:55
- Re: arguing with idiots, Torkel Franzen, 13:47
- Rational numbers and Group Theory, ADH, 13:46
- Re: Generalized series, Xantos, 13:43
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Lefty, 13:42
- Re: arguing with idiots, Karl M. Bunday, 13:38
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Lefty, 13:33
- Re: [Help] How to find the minima of a function like f(x,y,z,w) = max{|x-y|,|x-z|,|x-w|,|y-z|,|y-w|,|z-w|}, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:32
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Robert Kolker, 13:27
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Lefty, 13:20
- Re: a infinity product, Johann Wiesenbauer, 13:16
- Re: [Help] How to find the minima of a function like f(x,y,z,w) = max{|x-y|,|x-z|,|x-w|,|y-z|,|y-w|,|z-w|}, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:15
- Re: euclidean distance question, Van, 13:03
- Re: euclidean distance question, Van, 12:56
- Help with dihedral derivatives, Jellby, 12:52
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 12:41
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, mueckenh, 12:31
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Roger Beresford, 12:29
- Re: Easy question, Johann Wiesenbauer, 12:22
- !!!CONGRATULATIONS FROM THE 2005 MICROSOFTWORD LOTTERY!!!, mswordlotteryalert, 12:17
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Edward Green, 12:07
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Charlie, 11:45
- Re: euclidean distance question, asdf, 11:39
- Re: euclidean distance question, Van, 11:35
- Re: a infinity product, David C . Ullrich, 11:21
- Re: Generalized series, David C . Ullrich, 11:13
- Re: Generalized series, David C . Ullrich, 11:10
- the generator matrix of a lattice, poison . summer, 11:03
- the generator matrix of a lattice, poison . summer, 11:03
- Re: euclidean distance question, Van, 10:57
- Re: a infinity product, David W . Cantrell, 10:55
- a infinity product, Li Yi, 10:17
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Lefty, 10:02
- Re: euclidean distance question, asdf, 10:01
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 10:00
- Re: euclidean distance question, asdf, 09:59
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Robert Kolker, 09:45
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Robert Kolker, 09:41
- Re: Comment on math/0507611, David C . Ullrich, 09:36
- Re: Four Properties of the Euler Phi Function, Johann Wiesenbauer, 09:22
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 09:16
- Re: Finite Groups, , 09:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 09:14
- Re: Prime lists and Computation, Carl Parkes, 09:02
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Ross A. Finlayson, 08:36
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Ross A. Finlayson, 08:34
- Re: Generalized series, A N Niel, 08:18
- Re: predicting cycle sizes of 2r+1 mod p on (0..p-1), Phil Carmody, 08:08
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, EL, 08:06
- Re: Prime lists and Computation, Phil Carmody, 07:58
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, G.E. Ivey, 07:55
- Re: Square roots, Phil Carmody, 07:45
- Generalized series, Xantos, 07:42
- Re: number theory as a Physical theory?, Jaime Gaspar, 07:32
- Re: [Help] How to find the minima of a function like f(x,y,z,w) = max{|x-y|,|x-z|,|x-w|,|y-z|,|y-w|,|z-w|}, Rusty, 07:32
- Re: [Help] How to find the minima of a function like f(x,y,z,w) = max{|x-y|,|x-z|,|x-w|,|y-z|,|y-w|,|z-w|}, Rusty, 07:30
- Re: Difference between sequences and nets, Xantos, 07:24
- Re: first settled in sci.math?, quasi, 07:15
- number theory as a Physical theory?, gsax, 07:08
- Re: I am so sad., fernando revilla, 06:41
- Re: ISO proof of permutation enumeration algorithm, quasi, 06:35
- Re: euclidean distance question, jan hauben, 06:16
- Re: Recognise this?, matt271829-news, 05:53
- Re: Recognise this?, matt271829-news, 05:50
- Re: Four Properties of the Euler Phi Function, William Elliot, 05:30
- Re: I am so sad., Eldes, 04:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 04:31
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 04:29
- [Help] How to find the minima of a function like f(x,y,z,w) = max{|x-y|,|x-z|,|x-w|,|y-z|,|y-w|,|z-w|}, Jaime Gaspar, 03:36
- Re: Comparing apples and pears, Paul Nutteing, 03:26
- Re: I am so sad., Narcoleptic Insomniac, 02:58
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 02:39
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, Larry Krzewinski, 01:43
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 01:16
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 01:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 00:47
- Re: Troubling combinatorics, bischar, 00:04
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 00:00
July 29, 2005
- Re: Exercise, without local compactness, on compact Hausdorff, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 23:59
- Re: I am so sad., double d, 23:57
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, ToddSmith, 23:36
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, ToddSmith, 23:32
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, ToddSmith, 23:28
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, Greg Evans, 23:26
- Re: Comment on math/0507611, Eldes, 23:15
- Re: Four Properties of the Euler Phi Function, Brendan O'Sullivan, 23:13
- ISO proof of permutation enumeration algorithm, kj, 23:05
- Re: Four Properties of the Euler Phi Function, Brendan O'Sullivan, 23:04
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Randy Poe, 23:03
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Randy Poe, 23:02
- Re: Four Properties of the Euler Phi Function, Brendan O'Sullivan, 22:59
- Re: Four Properties of the Euler Phi Function, Daniel W. Johnson, 22:31
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Ross A. Finlayson, 22:27
- Re: System Solvability, C W, 22:19
- Re: euclidean distance question, jabara, 22:14
- Re: Finite Groups, Brendan O'Sullivan, 22:07
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Peter Webb, 22:05
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 22:04
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, Brendan O'Sullivan, 22:00
- Re: Comment on math/0507611, Eldes, 21:59
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Ross A. Finlayson, 21:50
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, Robert Kolker, 21:41
- Four Properties of the Euler Phi Function, Brendan O'Sullivan, 21:39
- Re: I am so sad., Dave Rusin, 21:36
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Randy Poe, 21:25
- Finite Groups, ADH, 21:20
- Re: Can anyone download/view videos from the Clay Institute?, Eldes, 21:18
- Re: I couldn't make it, Eldes, 21:15
- Re: I couldn't make it, Eldes, 21:13
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Ross A. Finlayson, 21:12
- Re: I couldn't make it, Eldes, 21:11
- Re: Easy question, Mukhtar Bekkali, 20:51
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Lee Rudolph, 20:38
- Re: Bizarritudes, Robert Israel, 20:31
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 20:04
- Re: Easy question, Timothy Little, 19:51
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, Zim Olson, 19:50
- Re: Greedy backpack filling, Don Reble, 19:39
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, C. Bond, 19:14
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 19:09
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, Proginoskes, 19:05
- Re: Easy question, Mukhtar Bekkali, 19:01
- Re: Integer Partition -- Extension, Proginoskes, 19:01
- Re: Greedy backpack filling, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 18:50
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 18:50
- Re: Easy question, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 18:47
- Re: surjective morphism of schemes, Jannick Asmus, 18:40
- Re: Greedy backpack filling, Robert Israel, 18:40
- Easy question, Mukhtar Bekkali, 18:36
- Re: History of Math, Jeremy Boden, 18:32
- Re: Troubling combinatorics, matt271829-news, 18:30
- Re: I couldn't make it, Proginoskes, 18:28
- Re: Troubling combinatorics, matt271829-news, 18:25
- Re: Integer Partition, Proginoskes, 18:24
- Re: Bizarritudes, Robert Israel, 18:18
- Re: Troubling combinatorics, Proginoskes, 18:18
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 18:10
- Re: Bizarritudes, Robert Israel, 17:54
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 17:47
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, b92057, 17:46
- Re: Greedy backpack filling, Elriel, 17:43
- Re: Comparing apples and pears, ienjball, 17:39
- Re: Greedy backpack filling, Elriel, 17:37
- Re: Greedy backpack filling, danheyman@xxxxxxxxx, 17:32
- Re: History of Math, Jim Spriggs, 17:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 16:57
- Re: History of Math, Jim Spriggs, 16:51
- Re: Difference between sequences and nets, quasi, 16:48
- Re: Can anyone download/view videos from the Clay Institute?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz, 16:44
- Re: Greedy backpack filling, stush, 16:42
- Re: surjective morphism of schemes, singau, 16:41
- Can anyone download/view videos from the Clay Institute?, Rouben Rostamian, 16:27
- Greedy backpack filling, Oscar Lazzarino, 16:25
- Re: Recovering from a computational mathematics "education", double d, 16:15
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 16:12
- Re: History of Math, mzafrullah, 16:07
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, Rick Decker, 16:06
- Re: Rolling an arbitrarily shaped log, Keith A. Lewis, 15:58
- Re: Rolling an arbitrarily shaped log, Phil Freedenberg, 15:56
- Re: Rolling an arbitrarily shaped log, Keith A. Lewis, 15:54
- Re: A probability question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:53
- Re: Rolling an arbitrarily shaped log, David W . Cantrell, 15:53
- Rolling an arbitrarily shaped log, Phil Freedenberg, 15:38
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, mmeron, 15:38
- Re: A probability question, b92057, 15:32
- Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, Jimmy Snyder, 15:32
- Re: Clarification on definition of limits, Virgil, 15:23
- Re: first settled in sci.math?, quasi, 15:18
- Re: Affiliate function, Keith A. Lewis, 15:17
- Re: Clarification on definition of limits, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:14
- Re: ALTERNATE FUELS, quasi, 15:10
- Re: History of Math, Herman Rubin, 14:58
- Re: Help with exercise in Apostol, quasi, 14:55
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Herman Rubin, 14:52
- Re: Affiliate function, Nikolai Onken, 14:50
- Re: Difference between sequences and nets, G. A. Edgar, 14:43
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 14:42
- Re: I am so sad., Kevin Long, 14:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 14:36
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 14:34
- Re: Clarification on definition of limits, Randy Poe, 14:31
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Randy Poe, 14:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 14:18
- Re: Difference between sequences and nets, Robert Israel, 14:15
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Herman Rubin, 14:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 14:13
- Re: Difference between sequences and nets, José Carlos Santos, 14:10
- Re: Clarification on definition of limits, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:08
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, Rich The Newsgroup Wacko, 14:06
- Re: Integer Partition -- Extension, Robert Israel, 14:01
- Re: Topology help: locally compact refinement, José Carlos Santos, 13:58
- Re: first settled in sci.math?, G. A. Edgar, 13:56
- Re: History of Math, Herman Rubin, 13:34
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, b92057, 13:32
- Re: Affiliate function, Keith A. Lewis, 13:30
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Tony, 13:25
- Re: modeling courtship as a sequential game, double d, 13:22
- Re: Recovering from a computational mathematics "education", Herman Rubin, 13:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:18
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, Herman Rubin, 13:18
- MS Office XP Pro $49.95 Macromedia, "Haley Berlin", 13:15
- Re: Clarification on definition of limits, Randy Poe, 13:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:11
- Difference between sequences and nets, Xantos, 13:08
- Re: Help solving a statistical problem, Keith A. Lewis, 13:03
- Re: Clarification on definition of limits, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:54
- Re: I am so sad., fernando revilla, 12:49
- Re: A probability question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 12:47
- Re: The Mathematics behind a Sports Book, T Block, 12:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:41
- Re: Statistics question, Ray Koopman, 12:34
- Clarification on definition of limits, Michael Stemper, 12:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:30
- Re: I am so sad., Eldes, 12:24
- Re: I am so sad., Eldes, 12:24
- Re: I am so sad., Eldes, 12:24
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Eldes, 12:23
- Re: ALTERNATE FUELS, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:22
- Re: I couldn't make it, Eldes, 12:22
- I am so sad., Eldes, 12:21
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, C. Bond, 12:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 12:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:02
- Re: L'hospital....., David C . Ullrich, 12:00
- I couldn't make it, Eldes, 11:59
- Re: L'hospital....., David C . Ullrich, 11:58
- Re: first settled in sci.math?, luiroto, 11:56
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, sasha mal, 11:11
- Re: A difficult hamiltonian problem, Sotto, 11:08
- Re: Combed braids, zeroDoNotSpamtype, 11:05
- Re: integral, Raymond Manzoni, 10:58
- Affiliate function, Nikolai Onken, 10:49
- ALTERNATE FUELS, Hydro Fuel, 10:37
- Re: 生活, Li Yi, 10:35
- Re: L'hospital....., Li Yi, 10:34
- Re: integral, wissam, 10:23
- Re: one math exercise, Rob Johnson, 10:17
- Re: Cononical Form, Sanford Geraci, 10:16
- Re: Cononical Form, Sanford Geraci, 10:15
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, Rick Decker, 10:15
- Re: modeling courtship as a sequential game, examachine, 10:08
- Re: L'hospital....., David C . Ullrich, 10:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 09:28
- Re: Determining weight, Don1, 09:26
- Re: one math exercise, Baloff, 09:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 09:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 09:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 09:03
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 09:02
- Make Money from Financial Markets, acepsut, 09:01
- Re: Lhospital or L'H\^opital (was: L'hospital....., Brad, 08:52
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, sasha mal, 08:44
- Re: Help with exercise in Apostol, Thomas, 08:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 08:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 08:30
- Re: L'hospital....., G. A. Edgar, 08:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 08:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 08:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 08:19
- Re: L'hospital....., Anon, 08:18
- Lhospital or L'H\^opital (was: L'hospital....., G. A. Edgar, 08:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 08:15
- Re: integral, Raymond Manzoni, 08:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 08:03
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 07:56
- Re: L'hospital....., Brad, 07:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 07:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 07:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 07:35
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, sasha mal, 07:31
- Re: thank you for all., mina_world, 07:09
- L'hospital....., mina_world, 07:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 06:48
- Re: Bizarritudes, fernando revilla, 06:34
- Re: Very basic topology question, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 06:19
- 生活, 豪TERRY, 06:18
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, Jeremy Boden, 06:08
- Re: Statistics question, C Coward, 06:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 06:03
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 05:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:27
- Re: integral, wissam, 05:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:07
- Integer Partition -- Extension, maria_celestiel, 05:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 05:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:03
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 04:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 04:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 04:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:29
- Re: The Mathematics behind a Sports Book, Michael Jørgensen, 04:25
- Re: Integer Partition, ogl100, 04:25
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:12
- Re: A difficult hamiltonian problem, Michael Jørgensen, 04:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 03:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:41
- Re: a curious integral, Michael Jørgensen, 03:38
- Re: Help with exercise in Apostol, quasi, 03:29
- Re: A probability question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 03:10
- Re: Help with exercise in Apostol, quasi, 03:07
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Dave L. Renfro, 02:34
- Re: Simplifying very bulk symbolic expressions in Mathematica, quasi, 02:31
- Re: " Is symmetry Enough ? ", alain verghote, 02:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 02:18
- A probability question, talzam, 02:14
- Re: closed form solution from Lagrange Interpolating Poly, alexandru . lupas, 02:14
- Re: Cononical Form, Gerry Myerson, 02:04
- modeling courtship as a sequential game, Gerry Myerson, 01:49
- Re: " Is symmetry Enough ? ", quasi, 01:44
- Re: Integral, Robert Israel, 01:34
- Re: The Mathematics behind a Sports Book, deviliscious, 01:26
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Tony, 01:24
- Re: Statistics question, Ray Koopman, 01:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 01:12
- Re: discriminating SO3 invariance from general O3 invariance, Greg Egan, 01:07
- Re: Help solving a statistical problem, Ray Koopman, 01:01
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, fishfry, 00:58
- Re: phi function......., quasi, 00:54
- Re: The Mathematics behind a Sports Book, Richard Henry, 00:48
- Re: Help with exercise in Apostol, double d, 00:45
- Re: Simplifying very bulk symbolic expressions in Mathematica, double d, 00:44
- Re: closed form solution from Lagrange Interpolating Poly, double d, 00:43
- Re: mathematician salaries, double d, 00:42
- Re: Bizarritudes, quasi, 00:40
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, quasi, 00:37
- Re: The Mathematics behind a Sports Book, deviliscious, 00:37
- Re: phi function......., Sanford Geraci, 00:33
- Re: phi function......., Sanford Geraci, 00:19
- Re: mathematician salaries, Sanford Geraci, 00:18
- Re: Help with exercise in Apostol, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 00:17
- Help with exercise in Apostol, Louis, 00:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 00:07
July 28, 2005
- Re: phi function......., Gerry Myerson, 23:48
- Re: interpolation of polynomial, quasi, 23:22
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 23:19
- Re: History of Math, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 23:11
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, malbrain, 23:08
- Re: interpolation of polynomial, quasi, 23:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Poker Joker, 23:05
- Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Peter Webb, 22:58
- Simplifying very bulk symbolic expressions in Mathematica, bozons, 22:50
- Re: Groups, abe . buckingham, 22:42
- Re: Del Square V--The Most Widely Found Pattern in Nature (W. W. Sawyer), W. Watson, 22:38
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, b92057, 22:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 22:36
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 22:34
- Re: discriminating SO3 invariance from general O3 invariance, Greg Egan, 22:32
- Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Tony, 22:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 22:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 22:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 22:17
- Re: Groups, Jim Pinkerton, 22:08
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 22:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 22:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 21:57
- Re: phi function......., Bruce Ikenaga, 21:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 21:45
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 21:41
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 21:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 21:29
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, b92057, 21:18
- Re: Integral, Ken Pledger, 21:05
- phi function......., mina_world, 21:04
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 21:03
- Re: Comparing apples and pears, Jim Spriggs, 20:39
- Re: Del Square V--The Most Widely Found Pattern in Nature (W. W. Sawyer), Chan-Ho Suh, 20:37
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, Gerry Myerson, 20:32
- first settled in sci.math?, quasi, 20:27
- Re: Integer Partition, Gerry Myerson, 20:26
- Re: q: optimization, Timothy Little, 20:26
- Re: interpolation of polynomial, Timothy Little, 20:12
- Re: discriminating SO3 invariance from general O3 invariance, Greg Egan, 20:08
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, quasi, 20:08
- Re: interpolation of polynomial, Gerry Myerson, 20:02
- Re: interpolation of polynomial, Ann Brandon, 20:00
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), quasi, 19:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:42
- Re: first settled in sci.math?, markwh04, 19:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 19:37
- Re: interpolation of polynomial, Timothy Little, 19:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 19:34
- q: optimization, laniik, 19:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:32
- Re: Integral, David W . Cantrell, 19:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:26
- interpolation of polynomial, Ann Brandon, 19:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 19:12
- Re: Question about infinity, David C . Ullrich, 19:11
- Re: Integral, Ken Pledger, 19:09
- Re: A different RSA challenge, Dave Rusin, 18:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 18:51
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, 888, 18:49
- Re: Bizarritudes, Timothy Little, 18:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 18:36
- Help solving a statistical problem, jim, 18:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 18:15
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, Proginoskes, 18:08
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, Proginoskes, 18:06
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, Proginoskes, 18:00
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 17:55
- Re: Groups, abe . buckingham, 17:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 17:47
- Re: Troubling combinatorics, matt271829-news, 17:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 17:45
- Re: Integral, Chris, 17:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:37
- Re: History of Math, quasi, 17:36
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 17:21
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar-, 17:12
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, Hero, 17:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 16:52
- Re: History of Math, quasi, 16:50
- Re: Statistics question, Ken Pledger, 16:49
- Re: Recognise this?, Ken Pledger, 16:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 16:42
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, b92057, 16:39
- Groups, Jim Pinkerton, 16:38
- closed form solution from Lagrange Interpolating Poly, kentonyee, 16:33
- Re: Recognise this?, Keith A. Lewis, 16:30
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 16:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Patrick, 16:19
- Re: Integral, David Moran, 16:16
- Re: Question about infinity, Arturo Magidin, 16:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 16:13
- Re: History of Math, abe . buckingham, 16:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 16:03
- Re: Question about infinity, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han . deBruijn, 15:49
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, b92057, 15:47
- Re: Gaussian elimination to Banach fixed point theorem, Virgil, 15:46
- Re: Del Square V--The Most Widely Found Pattern in Nature (W. W. Sawyer), W. Watson, 15:25
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 15:21
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, Ed Murphy, 15:14
- Re: Question about infinity, Artur, 15:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 15:01
- Re: Gaussian elimination to Banach fixed point theorem, Robert Israel, 14:50
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, b92057, 14:48
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 14:42
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 14:41
- Re: limit; zeta function, The World Wide Wade, 14:39
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 14:33
- Re: Integral, Lynn Kurtz, 14:30
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 14:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 14:27
- Re: Finding the inverse solution to a non-linear differential equation, Jeffrey H, 14:17
- Re: History of Math, John Schutkeker, 14:16
- Re: Integral, Lynn Kurtz, 14:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:00
- Re: surjective morphism of schemes, Jannick Asmus, 13:46
- Re: surjective morphism of schemes, Jannick Asmus, 13:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Michael Stemper, 13:37
- Re: continued fractions, sttscitrans, 13:32
- Re: volume and weight, Michael Stemper, 13:24
- Re: Closed subsets of a subspace., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:03
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:00
- Re: The Mathematics behind a Sports Book, T Block, 12:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:41
- Gaussian elimination to Banach fixed point theorem, nickhalstead, 12:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:35
- Re: Del Square V--The Most Widely Found Pattern in Nature (W. W. Sawyer), Gordo, 12:34
- Re: Integral, David W . Cantrell, 12:23
- Re: Question about infinity, Arturo Magidin, 12:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:19
- Question about infinity, Thomas, 12:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:14
- MatLab Version of Subr "Period" Needed, Brenneman, 12:10
- Re: Fields of characteristic p, Arturo Magidin, 12:10
- Re: Continuous bijections, G. A. Edgar, 12:08
- Re: Integral, A N Niel, 12:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:01
- Re: construct a function, Justin Young, 12:00
- Del Square V--The Most Widely Found Pattern in Nature (W. W. Sawyer), W. Watson, 12:00
- Re: Integral, David Moran, 11:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Victor Eijkhout, 11:50
- Re: Integral, David Moran, 11:49
- Re: History of Math, John Schutkeker, 11:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 11:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 11:42
- Re: Continuous bijections, Dave Rusin, 11:41
- Re: History of Math, G. A. Edgar, 11:40
- Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., G. A. Edgar, 11:36
- Integral, Chris, 11:33
- Re: construct a function, José Carlos Santos, 11:31
- Re: construct a function, G. A. Edgar, 11:30
- Re: construct a function, José Carlos Santos, 11:30
- Re: construct a function, Justin Young, 11:21
- Re: The Mathematics behind a Sports Book, fishfry, 11:17
- construct a function, Li Yi, 11:16
- construct a function, Li Yi, 11:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 11:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 11:13
- Statistics question, C Coward, 10:59
- Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., Dave Rusin, 10:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 10:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 10:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 10:30
- Re: History of Math, Daniel Grubb, 10:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 10:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 10:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 10:03
- The Mathematics behind a Sports Book, deviliscious, 10:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 09:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 09:53
- Re: History of Math, John Schutkeker, 09:53
- Re: History of Math, John Schutkeker, 09:51
- A difficult hamiltonian problem, GLari, 09:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 09:40
- Comparing apples and pears, Paul Nutteing, 09:11
- Re: Closed subsets of a subspace., William Elliot, 08:41
- Re: Closed subsets of a subspace., James, 08:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 08:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 08:12
- Re: Fields of characteristic p, crankbuster, 08:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 08:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 07:54
- Fields of characteristic p, Bob Stewart, 07:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 07:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 07:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 07:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 07:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 07:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 07:35
- Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:18
- Re: Closed subsets of a subspace., etuka, 07:15
- Re: Legendre Transform, James Dolan, 06:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 06:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 06:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 06:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 05:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 04:53
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:47
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, Tim S Roberts, 04:30
- Re: a curious integral, Michael Jørgensen, 04:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:04
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), David Kastrup, 03:53
- Re: Troubling combinatorics, Robert Israel, 03:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Ross A. Finlayson, 03:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 03:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 03:25
- Re: Integer Partition, ogl100, 03:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 03:23
- Re: continued fractions, Gottfried Helms, 02:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 02:51
- Re: Sum of 2 Squares in Different Ways = S, (...), Sundar Krishnan, 02:49
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, Keith Ramsay, 02:42
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, Ed Murphy, 02:38
- Re: " Finding t parametric functions for x^y = x^x ", alain verghote, 02:33
- Re: the exact value of zeta 3, Timothy Little, 02:25
- Re: " Is symmetry Enough ? ", alain verghote, 02:21
- Re: Examples of "Chaos" to Order Transformations??, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:15
- Re: limit; zeta function, The World Wide Wade, 02:08
- Re: limit; zeta function, The World Wide Wade, 02:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alan Morgan, 02:02
- Examples of "Chaos" to Order Transformations??, Zim Olson, 01:52
- Re: Solving complex equation... well, by my standard, Robert Israel, 01:42
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, Gerry Myerson, 01:26
- Re: Mathematical physics for graduate school, double d, 01:21
- Re: Integer Partition, Gerry Myerson, 01:20
- Re: limit; zeta function, Li Yi, 01:20
- Re: limit; zeta function, Robert Israel, 01:06
- Re: Integer Partition, Proginoskes, 01:04
- Inequality,convex function, convex set ?, alexandru . lupas, 01:00
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, Proginoskes, 01:00
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:39
- Re: Counting partition patterns of a set, William Elliot, 00:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 00:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 00:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:02
July 27, 2005
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:51
- Jobs in Quantitative Analytics, quantster.com, 23:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 23:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:33
- Integer Partition, ogl100, 23:30
- Re: History of Math, quasi, 23:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Poker Joker, 23:15
- Troubling combinatorics, Bob, 23:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Poker Joker, 23:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Poker Joker, 23:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:00
- Re: Mathematical concepts, examachine, 22:52
- Re: continued fractions, sttscitrans, 22:45
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, b92057, 22:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 22:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:42
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, b92057, 22:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 22:34
- Re: History of Math, quasi, 22:25
- Re: Breaking Down the Continuum, quasi, 22:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 22:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 22:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 22:13
- Re: Breaking Down the Continuum, Gerry Myerson, 22:06
- Re: Solving complex equation... well, by my standard, Eric Gisse, 22:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 21:54
- Re: Closed subsets of a subspace., William Elliot, 21:38
- Re: History of Math, mzafrullah, 21:30
- Re: System Solvability, C W, 21:22
- Re: limit; zeta function, Li Yi, 20:46
- Re: A new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 20:46
- Re: Help with Integral, Raymond Manzoni, 20:41
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 20:29
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Ron Sperber, 20:25
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 20:17
- Re: one math exercise, Gerry Myerson, 20:16
- Re: History of Math, quasi, 20:12
- Re: several mathematical games, swmeyers, 20:05
- Re: covering a grid with dominos -, Butch Malahide, 19:49
- Re: Counting partition patterns of a set, Gerry Myerson, 19:48
- Re: History of Math, Jim Spriggs, 19:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 19:40
- Re: Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, Gerry Myerson, 19:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Barb Knox, 19:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:20
- Re: History of Math, mzafrullah, 19:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:12
- Re: a curious integral, Proginoskes, 19:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:09
- Re: a curious integral, Proginoskes, 19:05
- Re: History of Math, Jim Spriggs, 19:04
- Re: Hey, Proginoskes, 19:03
- Vertex Coloring Planar Graphs, b92057, 19:02
- Re: System Solvability, C W, 19:01
- Re: several mathematical games, Proginoskes, 18:59
- Re: New Member, Proginoskes, 18:57
- Re: covering a grid with dominos, Proginoskes, 18:55
- Re: one math exercise, Baloff, 18:53
- Re: Darboux intermediate value theorem, David C . Ullrich, 18:52
- Re: Darboux intermediate value theorem, David C . Ullrich, 18:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 18:46
- Re: odd progression, Proginoskes, 18:46
- Re: rational or irrational?, Proginoskes, 18:43
- Re: Books on group theory, quasi, 18:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 18:30
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 18:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 18:22
- Re: History of Math, John Schutkeker, 18:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 18:18
- Re: Books on group theory, quasi, 18:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 18:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 18:08
- Re: Breaking Down the Continuum, Lee Rudolph, 18:07
- Recognise this?, matt271829-news, 18:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 18:06
- Re: not continuous., quasi, 17:56
- Re: not continuous., quasi, 17:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 17:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 17:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 17:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 17:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 17:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 17:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 17:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 17:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 17:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 17:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 17:12
- Re: System Solvability, C W, 17:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 16:00
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:58
- Re: Mathematical physics for graduate school, George, 15:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:57
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, bischar, 15:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 15:53
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:50
- Re: Mathematical physics for graduate school, George, 15:47
- Re: continued fractions, achava, 15:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:45
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Jane, 15:45
- Re: " Finding t parametric functions for x^y = x^x ", David W . Cantrell, 15:43
- Re: Bizarritudes, fernando revilla, 15:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 15:22
- Re: Darboux intermediate value theorem, speedy, 15:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:15
- Re: f' : not continuous., bischar, 15:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 15:13
- Re: Books on group theory, Arturo Magidin, 15:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 15:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:05
- Re: Darboux intermediate value theorem, speedy, 15:03
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:03
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, williammaw@xxxxxxx, 15:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 14:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 14:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:50
- Books on group theory, n3wb1e, 14:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 14:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 14:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 14:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 14:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 14:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 14:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:53
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 13:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 13:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:45
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 13:43
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 13:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alan Morgan, 13:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 13:36
- Re: " Finding t parametric functions for x^y = x^x ", alainverghote, 13:33
- Re: Very difficult integral, Herman Rubin, 13:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:30
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:28
- Re: a curious integral, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 13:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 13:25
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:23
- Re: a curious integral, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 13:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 13:18
- Re: limit; zeta function, Martin Wanvik, 13:18
- Re: limit; zeta function, The World Wide Wade, 13:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 13:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 13:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 13:04
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, abe . buckingham, 13:01
- Re: Length of a chord Q, edkupfer, 12:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 12:47
- continued fractions, Gottfried Helms, 12:47
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Randy Poe, 12:45
- Re: Hey, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:44
- Re: Ogive Wave, Lynn Kurtz, 12:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Randy Poe, 12:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 12:25
- Re: Bizarritudes, Keith A. Lewis, 12:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 12:17
- Re: a curious integral, Michael Jørgensen, 12:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 12:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 12:00
- Re: Exact Trisecting, Daniel W. Johnson, 11:52
- Re: Bizarritudes, fernando revilla, 11:41
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 11:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:16
- limit; zeta function, Li Yi, 11:10
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 11:04
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 11:02
- Re: mean-value theorem?, hassan boutkhourst, 11:01
- Re: Length of a chord Q, Keith A. Lewis, 11:00
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 11:00
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 10:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 10:55
- Re: discriminating SO3 invariance from general O3 invariance, Dave Rusin, 10:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 10:52
- Re: Closed subsets of a subspace., scattered, 10:48
- Closed subsets of a subspace., Greg, 10:39
- INCALCULABLE Definition: [adj] not capable of being calculated, Roger wilco, 10:28
- Re: " Finding t parametric functions for x^y = x^x ", David W . Cantrell, 10:24
- Re: Sarfatti Lectures in Warp Drive Physics 1, Clive, 10:21
- Re: Bizarritudes, Dik T. Winter, 10:09
- Re: convergence or divergence of a series, Artur, 10:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 10:05
- Re: Length of a chord Q, Rob Johnson, 10:00
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 09:40
- Re: Exact Trisecting, bassam king karzeddin, 09:21
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, Rick Decker, 09:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 08:53
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 08:49
- several mathematical games, swmeyers, 08:47
- Re: Exact Trisecting, bassam king karzeddin, 08:47
- Re: Very difficult integral, astanoff, 08:43
- Re: Some Weyl group automorphisms, Jim Heckman, 08:35
- Re: Very basic topology question, James, 08:31
- Re: Solving complex equation... well, by my standard, Manu, 08:29
- Re: New Member, David C . Ullrich, 08:29
- Counting partition patterns of a set, Aldar C-F. Chan, 08:27
- " Finding t parametric functions for x^y = x^x ", alainverghote, 08:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 08:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 08:22
- Re: f' : not continuous., G. A. Edgar, 08:17
- Re: the exact value of zeta 3, Pubkeybreaker, 08:15
- Re: the exact value of zeta 3, A N Niel, 08:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 08:05
- Re: Darboux intermediate value theorem, David C . Ullrich, 08:01
- Re: the exact value of zeta 3, titus_piezas, 07:53
- Re: Cone in a groove, john_ramsden, 07:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 07:50
- Re: integral, Raymond Manzoni, 07:49
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, 888, 07:47
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, 888, 07:39
- Re: Cone in a groove, matt271829-news, 07:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 07:27
- Re: the exact value of zeta 3, Jeroen Boschma, 07:10
- Re: covering a grid with dominos -, JEMebius, 07:09
- Re: A few proofs for trapezoids, stuck bad., john_ramsden, 07:01
- Re: not continuous., Justin Young, 07:00
- the exact value of zeta 3, flamegrilledmonkey, 06:53
- Re: integral, wissam, 06:47
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 06:44
- odd progression, Djidjo, 06:41
- f' : not continuous., mina_world, 06:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Torkel Franzen, 06:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 06:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 06:35
- Re: Sum of 2 Squares in Different Ways = S, (...), Timothy Murphy, 06:24
- A few proofs for trapezoids, stuck bad., Knite, 06:07
- Re: Very difficult integral, José Carlos Santos, 06:03
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Torkel Franzen, 06:02
- Re: Very difficult integral, José Carlos Santos, 05:59
- Re: discriminating SO3 invariance from general O3 invariance, Timothy Murphy, 05:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 05:54
- Re: Length of a chord Q, edkupfer, 05:52
- Very difficult integral, mark, 05:50
- Re: Identical people in the same town, Jeremy Boden, 05:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Torkel Franzen, 05:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 05:36
- Re: Prime number lists, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 05:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Torkel Franzen, 05:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 05:02
- Re: Sarfatti Lectures in Warp Drive Physics 1, Autymn D. C., 04:52
- Re: " Is symmetry Enough ? ", alain verghote, 04:49
- Re: discriminating SO3 invariance from general O3 invariance, gregegan, 04:41
- Re: covering a grid with dominos, quasi, 04:31
- Re: covering a grid with dominos, quasi, 04:27
- Re: Bizarritudes, quasi, 04:02
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, , 03:53
- Re: Hey, David Kastrup, 03:49
- Re: covering a grid with dominos, quasi, 03:43
- covering a grid with dominos, quasi, 03:16
- optimizing risks, deviliscious, 02:51
- Re: covering a grid with dominos, Gerry Myerson, 02:41
- Re: Length of a chord Q, Gerry Myerson, 02:37
- Re: discriminating SO3 invariance from general O3 invariance, Greg Egan, 02:32
- Re: Solving complex equation... well, by my standard, Rusty, 02:31
- Re: Hey, Timothy Little, 02:29
- Re: covering a grid with dominos, Robert Israel, 02:28
- Re: System Equation, Ioannis, 01:49
- Ogive Wave, mponteres, 01:43
- Re: Bizarritudes, Robert Israel, 01:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jiri Lebl, 01:29
- Re: Sum of 2 Squares in Different Ways = S, (...), Sundar Krishnan, 01:28
- Re: Recovering from a computational mathematics "education", cdetrio, 01:15
- Length of a chord Q, edkupfer, 01:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 00:55
- Re: covering a grid with dominos, Butch Malahide, 00:53
- Re: Noetherian??, quasi, 00:51
- Re: covering a grid with dominos, Butch Malahide, 00:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 00:43
- Re: Bizarritudes, Gerry Myerson, 00:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 00:32
- Re: covering a grid with dominos, Gerry Myerson, 00:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 00:32
- Re: Hey, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
July 26, 2005
- Re: Hey, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:54
- Re: Hey, mano_soler, 23:51
- Re: Hey, mano_soler, 23:48
- Re: Hey, Jim Spriggs, 23:39
- Re: Hey, nikki bentz, 23:25
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 23:25
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 23:08
- Re: Recovering from a computational mathematics "education", double d, 23:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:48
- Re: Bizarritudes, Gerry Myerson, 22:39
- Re: one math exercise, Baloff, 22:34
- Re: one math exercise, Baloff, 22:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 22:15
- Re: Solving complex equation... well, by my standard, Poker Joker, 22:08
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 22:00
- Re: " Is symmetry Enough ? ", quasi, 21:54
- Re: rational or irrational?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 21:51
- Re: System Equation, Peter L. Montgomery, 21:50
- Solving complex equation... well, by my standard, Manu, 21:47
- Re: one math exercise, Gerry Myerson, 21:18
- Re: I am slow in math... how do I improve my speed?, double d, 21:05
- Re: Bizarritudes, Gerry Myerson, 21:03
- Re: Noetherian??, quasi, 21:01
- Re: Length Problem ?, Gerry Myerson, 21:00
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, bischar, 21:00
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 20:58
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, Rick Decker, 20:54
- Re: Rigorously, when do you exchange the order of diff and integral, expectation and integral?, Robert Israel, 20:38
- Re: Forcing and P-Names, Rupert, 20:38
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 20:38
- Re: Breaking Down the Continuum, Rupert, 20:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 20:36
- Re: Noetherian??, crooner, 20:34
- Re: Hey, Jim Spriggs, 20:30
- Re: convergence or divergence of a series, The World Wide Wade, 20:26
- Re: Continuous Spectrum, carlos, 20:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 20:21
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, quasi, 20:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 20:13
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, quasi, 20:11
- Re: Bizarritudes, Robert Israel, 20:07
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, matt271829-news, 20:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 20:04
- Re: a curious integral, Robert Israel, 20:01
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Jane, 19:55
- Re: Noetherian??, quasi, 19:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 19:47
- Forcing and P-Names, John1980, 19:46
- Re: Hey, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:45
- Re: Noetherian??, quasi, 19:44
- Breaking Down the Continuum, John1980, 19:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dave Rusin, 19:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:36
- Rigorously, when do you exchange the order of diff and integral, expectation and integral?, Jane, 19:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:30
- Re: mathematica command to define discrete functions, Dave Seaman, 19:29
- Re: Inverse Logarithms, Jack, 19:28
- Re: Inverse Logarithms, Jack, 19:23
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, quasi, 19:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:18
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 19:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 19:07
- System Equation, Ioannis, 18:51
- Hey, nikki bentz, 18:46
- convergence or divergence of a series, Artur, 18:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 18:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Torkel Franzen, 18:41
- Re: Inverse Logarithms, The World Wide Wade, 18:40
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, quasi, 18:39
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Henry, 18:27
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 18:27
- Re: mathematica command to define discrete functions, Scoobidoo, 18:22
- Re: Sarfatti Lectures in Warp Drive Physics 1, Chris Devol, 18:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 18:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 18:17
- Inverse Logarithms, Jack, 18:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 18:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 18:11
- Re: Very basic topology question, markwh04, 18:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 18:09
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, Lee Rudolph, 18:07
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, Lee Rudolph, 18:06
- Re: lim(x to 0) (x.sin(1/x)), markwh04, 18:06
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, matt271829-news, 18:05
- Re: mean-value theorem?, markwh04, 18:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:56
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, 888, 17:55
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, 888, 17:52
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, markwh04, 17:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 17:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stevendaryl301, 17:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 17:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:48
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 17:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 17:37
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, David Kiewit, 17:36
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 17:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:35
- mathematica command to define a discrete function, Scoobidoo, 17:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:31
- Re: mathematica command to define discrete functions, David Park, 17:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Barb Knox, 17:30
- Re: mathematica command to define discrete functions, Dave Seaman, 17:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 17:19
- Re: Bizarritudes, Proginoskes, 17:19
- Re: a curious integral, Proginoskes, 17:16
- Re: Bizarritudes, Robert Israel, 17:11
- Re: System of even and odd integers, Proginoskes, 17:11
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, Patrick, 17:09
- Re: Four Color Theorem., Proginoskes, 17:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 17:02
- Re: Sarfatti Lectures in Warp Drive Physics 1, Larry Hammick, 17:00
- mathematica command to define discrete functions, Scoobidoo, 16:58
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, Robert Israel, 16:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 16:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 16:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:53
- Re: Darboux intermediate value theorem, speedy, 16:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 16:51
- Re: Darboux intermediate value theorem, speedy, 16:51
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, Michael Stemper, 16:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 16:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:48
- Re: Sarfatti Lectures in Warp Drive Physics 1, Tom Roberts, 16:46
- Re: Darboux intermediate value theorem, speedy, 16:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 16:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 16:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:39
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, Justin Young, 16:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:35
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, Dave Rusin, 16:31
- Re: New Member, nikki bentz, 16:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 16:27
- New Member, nikki bentz, 16:25
- Noetherian??, crooner, 16:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 16:12
- Re: Length Problem ?, The World Wide Wade, 16:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 16:04
- Re: discriminating SO3 invariance from general O3 invariance, Dave Rusin, 16:04
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, nikki bentz, 16:02
- Re: Sarfatti Lectures in Warp Drive Physics 1, Clive, 16:02
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, nikki bentz, 15:58
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Jim Spriggs, 15:48
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Jim Spriggs, 15:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:44
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, bischar, 15:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:30
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:29
- Re: System of even and odd integers, Jim Spriggs, 15:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 15:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 15:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 15:13
- Re: integral, Raymond Manzoni, 15:09
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, matt271829-news, 15:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:46
- Length Problem ?, Rick, 14:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 14:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Randy Poe, 14:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:25
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:47
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Randy Poe, 13:43
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 13:41
- Re: Sarfatti Lectures in Warp Drive Physics 1, Chris Devol, 13:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Randy Poe, 13:27
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Johann Wiesenbauer, 13:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:22
- Re: System Solvability, Ioannis, 13:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:18
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, Michael Stemper, 13:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:08
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, Arturo Magidin, 13:06
- Re: a curious integral, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 13:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:05
- Re: Some Weyl group automorphisms, , 13:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 12:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 12:45
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, franlorin, 12:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), briggs, 12:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:21
- Re: Sarfatti Lectures in Warp Drive Physics 1, Clive, 12:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:03
- Please web-bots!, mzafrullah, 12:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 11:50
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, nikki bentz, 11:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:48
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Jerry Avins, 11:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 11:38
- a curious integral, bugalore, 11:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:35
- Re: equation rearranging problem that I have, jeffa, 11:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 11:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 11:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 10:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 10:51
- Re: equation rearranging problem that I have, Rick Decker, 10:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:48
- surjective morphism of schemes, singau, 10:47
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 10:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:36
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, Rick Decker, 10:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 10:30
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:29
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, abe . buckingham, 10:25
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 10:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:08
- Re: Exact Trisecting, bassam king karzeddin, 10:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:06
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, 888, 10:05
- Re: Exact Trisecting, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 10:03
- equation rearranging problem that I have, jeffa, 09:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 09:51
- Re: Exact Trisecting, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 09:45
- Re: Cone in a groove, Narasimham, 09:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 09:37
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Dave Seaman, 09:09
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, matt271829-news, 09:04
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, matt271829-news, 08:52
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 08:48
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, abe . buckingham, 08:45
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, David Kastrup, 08:45
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Dave Seaman, 08:42
- integral, wissam, 08:41
- Re: Holder's , Young's inequalities, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 08:40
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Dave Seaman, 08:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 08:13
- Re: Darboux intermediate value theorem, David C . Ullrich, 07:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 07:48
- Re: Combed braids, Lee Rudolph, 07:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Barb Knox, 07:41
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), |-|erc, 07:41
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, David C . Ullrich, 07:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 07:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 07:34
- Combed braids, zeroDoNotSpamtype, 07:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 07:25
- Re: System of even and odd integers, Dvorak2, 07:23
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, matt271829-news, 07:19
- Plus Maths Magazine, titus_piezas, 07:04
- Re: Some Weyl group automorphisms, Jim Heckman, 07:01
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, sasha mal, 06:20
- Holder's , Young's inequalities, don, 05:35
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, torkel, 05:17
- Re: Finite Commutative Ring, Email me at CS not Boole, 05:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 05:03
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, David Kastrup, 05:00
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, David Kastrup, 04:58
- Re: Some Weyl group automorphisms, , 04:49
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, , 04:09
- Re: Simple plane and angle question..., Greg Egan, 04:09
- Re: mean-value theorem?, hassan boutkhourst, 04:07
- Re: How to read data from a graph?, Andy Spragg, 04:02
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, williammaw@xxxxxxx, 04:01
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, quasi, 03:57
- Re: Exact Trisecting, bassam king karzeddin, 03:55
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, quasi, 03:45
- Re: Four Color Theorem., Gerry Myerson, 03:28
- Re: Null Value In Set Theory, José Carlos Santos, 03:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:25
- Plateau Problem, lcs_nsp, 03:21
- Re: Legendre Transform, Zigoteau, 03:21
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, quasi, 03:16
- Null Value In Set Theory, williammaw@xxxxxxx, 03:12
- Re: Primes: are all odd primes (as factors) listed by 2^k-1 where k=2..inf, Gottfried Helms, 03:10
- Re: lim(x to 0) (x.sin(1/x)), William Elliot, 03:05
- Re: Finite Commutative Ring, quasi, 02:52
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, quasi, 02:37
- Re: Finite Commutative Ring, mr_mathematician, 02:33
- Re: Cahn-Hilliard a priori estimates, don, 02:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 02:19
- Re: Euclidean postulates, bassam king karzeddin, 02:13
- Re: " Is symmetry Enough ? ", alainverghote, 02:10
- Simple plane and angle question..., Allen, 02:07
- Re: Darboux intermediate value theorem, Stuart M Newberger, 01:51
- Re: Finite Commutative Ring, Bill Dubuque, 01:49
- Re: Mathematical physics for graduate school, double d, 01:06
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, quasi, 01:00
- Re: one math exercise, Baloff, 00:48
- Re: mean-value theorem?, Li Yi, 00:35
- Re: Exact Trisecting, quasi, 00:18
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, abe . buckingham, 00:17
- Re: I am slow in math... how do I improve my speed?, abe . buckingham, 00:11
- Re: Legendre Transform, Eric Gisse, 00:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 00:09
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, abe . buckingham, 00:00
July 25, 2005
- Re: Exact Trisecting, Gerry Myerson, 23:56
- Re: Four Color Theorem., Gerry Myerson, 23:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 23:37
- Re: lim(x to 0) (x.sin(1/x)), khkwa, 23:37
- Re: a limit involving Gamma function, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 23:25
- Re: Four Color Theorem., b92057, 23:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 23:24
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, Gerry Myerson, 23:22
- Re: Dharwadker Proof Attempt, Steven H. Cullinane, 23:20
- Finite Commutative Ring, Jim Pinkerton, 23:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 23:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 23:12
- Re: lim(x to 0) (x.sin(1/x)), William Elliot, 23:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 23:06
- Re: Four Color Theorem., b92057, 23:06
- Re: I am slow in math... how do I improve my speed?, The Ghost In The Machine, 23:00
- Re: lim(x to 0) (x.sin(1/x)), Narcoleptic Insomniac, 22:59
- Re: lim(x to 0) (x.sin(1/x)), Peter L. Montgomery, 22:43
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, abe . buckingham, 22:38
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, quasi, 22:37
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, quasi, 22:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Barb Knox, 22:27
- Re: System of even and odd integers, Jim Spriggs, 22:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Barb Knox, 22:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:01
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, 888, 21:58
- Re: Four Color Theorem., Gerry Myerson, 21:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 21:53
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, ToddSmith, 21:52
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, Gerry Myerson, 21:49
- Re: Exact Trisecting, Jim Spriggs, 21:48
- Re: I am slow in math... how do I improve my speed?, fishfry, 21:47
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 21:34
- Re: Four Color Theorem., b92057, 21:33
- Re: Mathematical physics for graduate school, George, 21:33
- Re: Cahn-Hilliard a priori estimates, Jim Spriggs, 21:30
- Re: Mathematical physics for graduate school, George, 21:29
- Re: Four Color Theorem., Proginoskes, 21:16
- Re: Cahn-Hilliard a priori estimates, nikki bentz, 21:10
- Re: Bizarritudes, Proginoskes, 21:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 21:07
- Re: Self Study problem help - Group theory, abe . buckingham, 21:07
- Self Study problem help - Group theory, abe . buckingham, 21:00
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, T Wake, 20:58
- Re: one math exercise, Baloff, 20:58
- Re: Spherical geometry, Greg Egan, 20:57
- Re: Four Color Theorem., b92057, 20:51
- Re: lim(x to 0) (x.sin(1/x)), khkwa, 20:47
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 20:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 20:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 20:43
- Re: I am slow in math... how do I improve my speed?, David Kastrup, 20:43
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, David Kastrup, 20:40
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, matt271829-news, 20:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 20:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 20:30
- Re: System Solvability, C W, 20:26
- Re: I am slow in math... how do I improve my speed?, double d, 20:23
- Re: Very basic topology question, Gerry Myerson, 20:22
- Re: one math exercise, Gerry Myerson, 20:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 20:21
- Re: Mathematical physics for graduate school, double d, 20:20
- Re: Spherical geometry, Jim Heckman, 20:17
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 20:16
- Re: Darboux intermediate value theorem, Rupert, 20:15
- Re: Four Color Theorem., Gerry Myerson, 20:08
- Re: Four Color Theorem., G.E. Ivey, 20:00
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, John E. Hadstate, 19:56
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Dave Seaman, 19:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 19:48
- Re: a limit involving Gamma function, Rob Johnson, 19:47
- Four Color Theorem., b92057, 19:46
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, matt271829-news, 19:46
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, David Kastrup, 19:45
- I am slow in math... how do I improve my speed?, Jane, 19:38
- 3D floretion plots, Dement, 19:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 19:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 19:25
- Re: Exact Trisecting, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 19:25
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Dave Rusin, 19:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 19:16
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, John E. Hadstate, 19:16
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, matt271829-news, 19:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 19:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 19:06
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, quasi, 19:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:02
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, David Kastrup, 19:00
- Re: System Solvability, Ioannis, 19:00
- Re: System of even and odd integers, Lynn Kurtz, 18:58
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, David Kastrup, 18:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 18:53
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Barb Knox, 18:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Lee Rudolph, 18:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 18:48
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, 888, 18:47
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 18:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 18:39
- Re: Upperbounds on the actualdensity of odd perfect numbers over the integers, Joshua Zelinsky, 18:39
- Re: Grid Subdividing Solitaire Game, quasi, 18:36
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, quasi, 18:26
- Re: System Solvability, jan hauben, 18:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 18:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 18:21
- Tetrad Formalism for Emergent Einstein Gravity, Jack Sarfatti, 18:18
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, markwh04, 18:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 18:18
- Re: Integral again, William Elliot, 18:16
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, matt271829-news, 18:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 18:08
- Re: Integral again, William Elliot, 18:07
- Re: System Solvability, Ioannis, 18:00
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:54
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, mark_pfannenstiel, 17:52
- Re: System Solvability, jan hauben, 17:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 17:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:43
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Robert Israel, 17:30
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 17:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 17:14
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 17:11
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, David Kastrup, 17:10
- Re: System of even and odd integers, Dvorak2, 17:09
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Randy Yates, 17:08
- Re: Mathematical physics for graduate school, rip pelletier, 17:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 17:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:56
- Re: Legendre Transform, Zigoteau, 16:55
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 16:52
- Re: one math exercise, Baloff, 16:51
- Re: System of even and odd integers, Jim Spriggs, 16:46
- System of even and odd integers, Dvorak2, 16:41
- Cahn-Hilliard a priori estimates, don, 16:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 16:26
- Re: " Is symmetry Enough ? ", quasi, 16:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 16:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 16:13
- Re: Bizarritudes, Jim Spriggs, 16:12
- Re: " Is symmetry Enough ? ", quasi, 16:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 16:11
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 16:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 16:05
- Re: a limit involving Gamma function, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 16:05
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 16:03
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 16:02
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 15:59
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 15:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 15:58
- Re: mean-value theorem?, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 15:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), david petry, 15:53
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 15:53
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:52
- System Solvability, Ioannis, 15:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 15:46
- Re: lim(x to 0) (x.sin(1/x)), khkwa, 15:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:45
- Re: Grid Subdividing Solitaire Game, Leroy Quet, 15:45
- Re: lim(x to 0) (x.sin(1/x)), Narcoleptic Insomniac, 15:43
- Re: Integral again, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 15:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 15:35
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Ioannis, 15:33
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Justin Young, 15:33
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Wayne Brown, 15:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:31
- Darboux intermediate value theorem, speedy, 15:30
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:27
- Re: Hi, Jim Spriggs, 15:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:20
- Re: Hi, Jim Spriggs, 15:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 15:17
- + - * / Game, Leroy Quet, 15:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 15:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), georgie, 15:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:14
- Grid Subdividing Solitaire Game, Leroy Quet, 15:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:11
- lim(x to 0) (x.sin(1/x)), speedy, 15:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:08
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, David Kastrup, 15:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:03
- Re: Hi, Lynn Kurtz, 14:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 14:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 14:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 14:54
- Re: Bizarritudes, Robert Israel, 14:53
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 14:53
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 14:53
- Re: Bizarritudes, Rick Decker, 14:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), georgie, 14:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:40
- Help with Integral, Andreas Dieckmann, 14:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:32
- Re: Euclidean postulates, G. A. Edgar, 14:31
- Hi, nikki bentz, 14:30
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 14:25
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:19
- Re: a limit involving Gamma function, A N Niel, 14:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:00
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Daniel M. Ryan, 13:57
- Re: Recovering from a computational mathematics "education", Michael Stemper, 13:50
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 13:42
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 13:41
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, David Kastrup, 13:36
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, David Kastrup, 13:33
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 13:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 13:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:24
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Dave Seaman, 13:21
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Michael Hoppe, 13:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 13:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 13:12
- Re: one math exercise, Baloff, 13:11
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Christian Claiborn, 13:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 13:09
- Re: jensen for a derivative, Robert Israel, 13:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 13:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 12:56
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, Michael Stemper, 12:50
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, mark_pfannenstiel, 12:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 12:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 12:38
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 12:33
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 12:25
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, Rick Decker, 12:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 12:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 12:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 12:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 12:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 11:54
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, sasha mal, 11:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:48
- Re: Legendre Transform, Eric Gisse, 11:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 11:33
- " Is symmetry Enough ? ", alainverghote, 11:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 11:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 11:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:20
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Ioannis, 11:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 11:07
- Re: Spherical geometry, Rob Johnson, 11:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 10:59
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Randy Poe, 10:46
- Re: Wierd ideal question, Jose Capco, 10:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 10:43
- Re: Euclidean postulates, bassam king karzeddin, 10:43
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 10:36
- Re: Very basic topology question, James, 10:33
- Re: Very basic topology question, James, 10:33
- Re: Wierd ideal question, Jose Capco, 10:32
- Re: a limit involving Gamma function, Rob Johnson, 10:30
- Re: a limit involving Gamma function, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 10:28
- Re: regular languages behaviour at infinity, scattered, 10:15
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, ajith_pc, 10:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 09:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 09:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 09:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 09:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Randy Poe, 09:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 09:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 09:38
- Re: a limit involving Gamma function, Li Yi, 09:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 09:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 09:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 09:26
- Re: Difficult Integral - who can help?, Richard Mathar, 09:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 09:17
- Re: Integral again, mark, 09:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 09:15
- Re: a limit involving Gamma function, A N Niel, 09:15
- a limit involving Gamma function, Li Yi, 09:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dave Seaman, 09:00
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 08:59
- Re: Integral again, A N Niel, 08:51
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Frank J. Lhota, 08:45
- one math exercise, Baloff, 08:32
- mean-value theorem?, Li Yi, 08:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 08:28
- regular languages behaviour at infinity, sasha mal, 08:23
- Re: jensen for a derivative, David C . Ullrich, 08:00
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, quasi, 07:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 07:47
- Re: Spherical geometry, Jim Heckman, 07:37
- Re: Some Weyl group automorphisms, Jim Heckman, 07:37
- Re: Integral again, mark, 07:28
- Re: Integral again, William Elliot, 06:40
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, timm, 06:23
- Integral again, mark, 06:21
- Re: Exact Trisecting, bassam king karzeddin, 06:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 06:00
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 05:56
- Re: jensen for a derivative, José Carlos Santos, 05:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:47
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 05:43
- Re: "Analytic expansion", Jeremy Boden, 05:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:28
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Graham Jones, 05:17
- Multiexponential fitting, Marius Baw, 05:15
- Re: Legendre Transform, Zigoteau, 05:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 04:46
- Re: Exact Trisecting, bassam king karzeddin, 04:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 04:45
- Re: What is the solution of that equation??, wartki, 04:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 04:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:39
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 25, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 04:34
- Re: Mathematical physics for graduate school, Ian Taylor, 04:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 04:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), MoeBlee, 04:15
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Bob Cain, 04:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:50
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, David Kastrup, 03:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:32
- Mathematical physics for graduate school, George, 03:22
- Re: About the definition of pyramid and tetrahedron, Gerry Myerson, 03:15
- Re: Bizarritudes, Robert Israel, 02:21
- Re: Balls and Bins; But 2 colors of balls!, ogl100, 02:15
- Re: Balls and Bins; But 2 colors of balls!, Robert Israel, 02:09
- Re: Upperbounds on the actualdensity of odd perfect numbers over the integers, jsavard, 02:01
- Nested commutators as derivatives? (Is a Lie Group closed?), lost . and . lonely . physicist, 01:47
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 01:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jiri Lebl, 01:39
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), jsavard, 01:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jiri Lebl, 01:19
- Re: one math exercise, Gerry Myerson, 01:01
- Re: Is this map continuous?, William Elliot, 01:01
- Re: Recovering from a computational mathematics "education", Rogério Brito, 01:00
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, ToddSmith, 01:00
- Re: Complex Root Equations, HELP!, Gerry Myerson, 00:51
- Re: About the definition of pyramid and tetrahedron, Virgil, 00:47
- Re: Complex Root Equations, HELP!, Lynn Kurtz, 00:47
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:30
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Robert Israel, 00:28
- Complex Root Equations, HELP!, novelo, 00:27
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, mmeron, 00:10
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Joseph Hertzlinger, 00:02
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Joseph Hertzlinger, 00:01
July 24, 2005
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, Edward Green, 23:59
- About the definition of pyramid and tetrahedron, Sam Hwang, 23:50
- Balls and Bins; But 2 colors of balls!, ogl100, 23:41
- Re: Upperbounds on the actualdensity of odd perfect numbers over the integers, Proginoskes, 23:34
- Re: A potpourri of mathematical curiosities, Proginoskes, 23:29
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 23:28
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, cbrown, 23:25
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 23:23
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Proginoskes, 23:20
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Jerry Avins, 23:18
- Re: Bizarritudes, Proginoskes, 23:14
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Mark Borgerding, 23:00
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, quasi, 22:48
- Re: compact groups and AC, William Elliot, 22:40
- Re: compact groups and AC, William Elliot, 22:39
- Re: Function is irreducible, quasi, 22:21
- Re: one math exercise, Gerry Myerson, 21:39
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors, 21:25
- Re: Special primes, quasi, 21:16
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:01
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:56
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, Edward Green, 20:56
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Jerry Avins, 20:52
- Re: jensen for a derivative, Li Yi, 20:51
- Re: History of the term, "Lebesgue number", Lee Rudolph, 20:49
- Re: Upperbounds on the actualdensity of odd perfect numbers over the integers, Pubkeybreaker, 20:28
- GR Measurement Theory, Jack Sarfatti, 20:26
- Re: Upperbounds on the actualdensity of odd perfect numbers over the integers, Gerry Myerson, 20:13
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Robert Israel, 20:06
- Jobs in Quantitative Analytics and Trading, Financial Engineering and Risk Management, www.quantster.com, 19:58
- Re: post-office problem on three vars., closed form, Gerry Myerson, 19:55
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Robert Israel, 19:50
- Re: Abstract Algebra, Gerry Myerson, 19:41
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Jim Burns, 19:33
- Re: Recovering from a computational mathematics "education", Ken Pledger, 19:33
- Re: one math exercise, Gerry Myerson, 19:15
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, quasi, 19:09
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 19:09
- Re: Very basic topology question, Gerry Myerson, 19:05
- Re: Special primes, quasi, 18:56
- Re: Very basic topology question, José Carlos Santos, 18:54
- Re: Very basic topology question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 18:46
- Re: Special primes, David Hartley, 18:41
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 18:39
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Russell . Martin, 18:36
- Re: jensen for a derivative, José Carlos Santos, 18:35
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, kiki, 18:35
- Very basic topology question, James, 18:29
- Function is irreducible, jamesdickerson00, 18:25
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, Michael Albert, 18:06
- Re: maximizing the largest singular value of a product, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:52
- Re: Are all Latin squares group tables?, Ken Pledger, 17:48
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, David Kastrup, 17:45
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 17:29
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 17:22
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, David M Einstein, 17:21
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, double d, 17:19
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Jerry Avins, 17:15
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 17:09
- Re: compact groups and AC, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:02
- Re: assuming odd integer?, Phil Freedenberg, 17:02
- Re: Is this map continuous?, quasi, 17:00
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, David Kastrup, 16:29
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Prai Jei, 16:23
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 16:10
- Re: Motivation for matrix algebra, Adam, 16:06
- Re: Wierd ideal question, quasi, 15:54
- Re: Wierd ideal question, quasi, 15:50
- assuming odd integer?, ab@xxxxxx, 15:44
- Re: Pythagorus illustration, Robert Israel, 15:40
- Re: Is this map continuous?, quasi, 15:34
- Re: Exact Trisecting, quasi, 15:28
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, kiki, 15:25
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, kiki, 15:22
- Re: Abstract Algebra, ADH, 15:18
- Re: Bizarritudes, Robert Israel, 15:17
- Re: Abstract Algebra, ADH, 15:14
- Pythagorus illustration, Clifford Nelson, 15:11
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, David Kastrup, 15:06
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 15:02
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 15:00
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 14:56
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Randy Poe, 14:56
- Re: compact groups and AC, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:48
- Re: compact groups and AC, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:47
- Re: collection of mathematically elegant tricks, Rune Allnor, 14:34
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, mmeron, 14:16
- collection of mathematically elegant tricks, kiki, 14:14
- Re: looking for proof., The World Wide Wade, 13:59
- Re: If lim (f(x),x->0) exists,, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 13:58
- looking for proof., asdf, 13:44
- Re: If lim (f(x),x->0) exists,, José Carlos Santos, 13:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 13:33
- Re: 2^n -1, Ed Hook, 13:32
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, T Wake, 13:19
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Mark Martin, 13:15
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David McAnally, 13:10
- Re: Is this map continuous?, Ed Hook, 13:08
- Re: Bizarritudes, Jim Burns, 13:03
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David McAnally, 13:02
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 12:49
- Re: Cone in a groove, Narasimham, 12:39
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 12:39
- Re: Cone in a groove, Narasimham, 12:32
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, T Wake, 12:21
- Re: A Limit Involving An Infinite Sum, Rob Johnson, 12:07
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 11:52
- Re: Primes: a^k - b^k related to Fermats little theorem; exist a^k - b^k = n*p^3 for prime k?, Gottfried Helms, 11:45
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 11:44
- Re: Product of fields in (Von Neumann) Regular rings., Jose Capco, 11:41
- Re: Question to NASA, bassam king karzeddin, 11:41
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, David M Einstein, 11:25
- Re: Exact Trisecting, G.E. Ivey, 11:25
- Re: Question to NASA, G.E. Ivey, 11:15
- Re: A question about projections, olejman, 11:14
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, double d, 11:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David C . Ullrich, 11:11
- Re: combinatorial question, olejman, 11:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Email me at CS not Boole, 11:00
- Re: Primes: a^k - b^k related to Fermats little theorem; exist a^k - b^k = n*p^3 for prime k?, Pubkeybreaker, 11:00
- Re: Euclidean postulates, chasjac, 10:56
- Re: Exact Trisecting, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 10:54
- jensen for a derivative, Li Yi, 10:54
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 10:53
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, ghytrfvbnmju7654, 10:45
- Re: Bizarritudes, Jim Burns, 10:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 10:40
- Re: Exact Trisecting, bassam king karzeddin, 10:30
- Primes: a^k - b^k related to Fermats little theorem; exist a^k - b^k = n*p^3 for prime k?, Gottfried Helms, 10:20
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 10:11
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, Herman Trivilino, 10:02
- Re: Wierd ideal question, David C . Ullrich, 09:54
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Steven H. Cullinane, 09:52
- Re: Two distribution theory questions, David C . Ullrich, 09:40
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, Schoenfeld, 09:38
- Re: Two distribution theory questions, David C . Ullrich, 09:38
- Re: Exact Trisecting, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 09:37
- Wierd ideal question, Jose Capco, 09:27
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, rabadi, 09:25
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Jim Spriggs, 09:25
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, David C . Ullrich, 09:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), klaus . schmid, 09:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 09:05
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, T Wake, 08:59
- Is this map continuous?, principalbundles, 08:55
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, double d, 08:29
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 08:22
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 08:20
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:41
- Re: compact groups and AC, G. A. Edgar, 07:11
- Re: If lim (f(x),x->0) exists,, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 07:07
- Re: History of the term, "Lebesgue number", G. A. Edgar, 07:06
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, sttscitrans, 05:47
- Re: Exact Trisecting, bassam king karzeddin, 05:19
- Re: Legendre Transform, Eric Gisse, 04:44
- Re: If lim (f(x),x->0) exists,, José Carlos Santos, 04:11
- Re: definition of limit, José Carlos Santos, 04:10
- Re: If lim (f(x),x->0) exists,, Jean-Pierre MERX, 04:10
- Dharwadker Proof Attempt, Steven H. Cullinane, 04:04
- Re: History of the term, "Lebesgue number", José Carlos Santos, 03:57
- Re: Summation of choice functions, quasi, 03:55
- Re: A question about projections, Ulysse Keller, 03:53
- Re: Number of unique Sudoku grids ?, Ulysse Keller, 03:53
- If lim (f(x),x->0) exists,, Herb, 03:48
- Re: compact groups and AC, William Elliot, 03:42
- Re: Special primes, quasi, 03:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 03:32
- Re: Special primes, quasi, 03:29
- Re: Special primes, quasi, 03:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Vaughan Pratt, 03:12
- Re: Legendre Transform, mmeron, 03:00
- Re: Euclidean postulates, bassam king karzeddin, 02:59
- Re: compact groups and AC, William Elliot, 02:54
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, David Kastrup, 02:49
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, mmeron, 02:47
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Little, 02:33
- Re: compact groups and AC, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:25
- Re: set of a set etc., William Elliot, 02:21
- Re: compact groups and AC, William Elliot, 02:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Vaughan Pratt, 01:58
- Number of unique Sudoku grids ?, w . taylor, 01:36
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Little, 01:12
- Re: compact groups and AC, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 00:48
- Re: Two distribution theory questions, Stuart M Newberger, 00:43
- Re: compact groups and AC, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:33
- Re: definition of limit, Herb, 00:13
- Re: Summation of choice functions, John Navarra, 00:07
July 23, 2005
- Re: A little bit of History, bischar, 23:50
- Re: Special primes, gerard46, 23:49
- Re: Special primes, quasi, 23:36
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Keith Ramsay, 23:32
- Re: compact groups and AC, William Elliot, 23:30
- Re: Special primes, gerard46, 23:30
- Re: History of the term, "Lebesgue number", Jim Spriggs, 23:25
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 23:25
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:20
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, N. Silver, 23:15
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, bischar, 23:14
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 23:13
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 23:05
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Gerry Myerson, 23:01
- Re: Summation of choice functions, Lynn Kurtz, 23:01
- History of the term, "Lebesgue number", Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:44
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, Jim Black, 22:43
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 22:42
- Re: Special primes, gerard46, 22:20
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 22:20
- Re: A missing factor to solve a functional equation ., William Elliot, 21:53
- Re: Are all Latin squares group tables?, Herman Rubin, 21:42
- Negative Primes, Negative Multiplication, Negative Exponentiation, ... Negative Math, rer, 21:38
- Re: Fields without fields & Co-homology, xxein, 21:36
- Re: Special primes, quasi, 21:28
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, Proginoskes, 21:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 21:19
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 20:56
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 20:54
- Re: Summation of choice functions, khkwa, 20:52
- compact groups and AC, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 20:48
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 20:28
- Re: Motivation for matrix algebra, quasi, 20:27
- Re: Two distribution theory questions, The World Wide Wade, 20:27
- Re: Special primes, gerard46, 20:22
- Re: Need help findingthe minimum eigen vector?, Dik T. Winter, 20:15
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Little, 20:07
- Re: Spherical geometry Proofs/derivations, Greg Egan, 20:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 19:58
- Re: Bizarritudes, Jim Burns, 19:57
- Re: Recovering from a computational mathematics "education", cbrown, 19:56
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 19:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 19:49
- Re: Two distribution theory questions, Stuart M Newberger, 19:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 19:47
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Little, 19:47
- Re: Special primes, Leonhard Vogt, 19:45
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, cbrown, 19:43
- Re: Two distribution theory questions, Stuart M Newberger, 19:40
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 19:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Ross A. Finlayson, 19:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 19:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), david petry, 19:29
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Little, 19:25
- Re: Special primes, gerard46, 19:24
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 19:18
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Kris Olhovsky, 19:02
- Re: Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, Timothy Little, 18:58
- Re: A Limit Involving An Infinite Sum, Raymond Manzoni, 18:48
- Re: A Limit Involving An Infinite Sum, Raymond Manzoni, 18:44
- Re: binary linear operator, Timothy Little, 18:39
- Re: Special primes, Don Reble, 18:34
- Re: Are all Latin squares group tables?, Timothy Little, 18:27
- Re: Are all Latin squares group tables?, Mike Kent, 18:19
- Summation of choice functions, John Navarra, 18:16
- Summation of choice functions, John Navarra, 18:12
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 18:12
- Re: Special primes, David Kastrup, 18:09
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 18:03
- Re: Legendre Transform, timo, 18:01
- Summation of choice functions, John Navarra, 17:55
- Re: Identical people in the same town, Gib Bogle, 17:55
- Re: Special primes, bischar, 17:53
- Re: Special primes, mathman, 17:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han . deBruijn, 17:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han . deBruijn, 17:32
- Special primes, bischar, 17:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:17
- Re: why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, EinsteinHoax, 17:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:07
- why we are a bunch of pathetic losers, Michael Albert, 17:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 17:05
- Re: Wierd ideal question, quasi, 17:04
- Jobs in Quantitative Finance, quantster.com, 16:54
- Re: Wierd ideal question, quasi, 16:43
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Wayne Brown, 16:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han . deBruijn, 16:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han . deBruijn, 16:26
- Re: Motivation for matrix algebra, Adam, 16:24
- Modelling bicycle trail - Tough maths?, 888, 16:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 16:17
- Re: Sums, bischar, 16:12
- Re: Two distribution theory questions, The World Wide Wade, 16:12
- Re: Sums, bischar, 16:10
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, G . Frege, 16:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han . deBruijn, 15:56
- Re: Sums, Daniel McLaury, 15:45
- Re: definition of limit, Leonhard Vogt, 15:04
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, sttscitrans, 14:51
- Re: arguing with idiots, maky m., 14:41
- Sums, bischar, 14:38
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Prai Jei, 14:19
- Fields without fields & Co-homology, Jack Sarfatti, 13:58
- Re: Recovering from a computational mathematics "education", Christian Claiborn, 13:53
- Legendre Polynomial of order -1 ??, ab@xxxxxx, 13:37
- A Limit Involving An Infinite Sum, Leroy Quet, 13:31
- Re: Difficult Integral - who can help?, mark, 13:25
- Re: When product sigma(k)/d(k) = integer, Leroy Quet, 13:20
- Need help findingthe minimum eigen vector?, Marc Reinig, 13:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), klaus . schmid, 13:02
- Re: Abstract Algebra, Jim Spriggs, 12:50
- Legendre Polynomial of order = -1, symbio, 12:48
- Legendre Polynomials, symbio, 12:47
- Re: Spherical geometry Proofs/derivations, Zinc Potterman, 12:41
- Re: Abstract Algebra, Jim Spriggs, 12:40
- Re: Difficult Integral - who can help?, mark, 12:34
- Re: set of a set etc., Jasper, 12:34
- Abstract Algebra, ADH, 12:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 11:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 11:37
- Re: Rings problem, Johann Wiesenbauer, 11:36
- Abstract Algebra, ADH, 11:35
- Re: definition of limit, José Carlos Santos, 11:07
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 11:04
- Re: definition of limit, Jim Spriggs, 10:53
- Re: arguing with idiots, Jim Spriggs, 10:48
- Re: Spherical geometry, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:46
- Re: Wierd ideal question, G. A. Edgar, 10:33
- definition of limit, Herb, 10:29
- Re: A missing factor to solve a functional equation ., alainverghote, 10:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 10:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 10:11
- Re: binary linear operator, David C . Ullrich, 09:53
- Re: Two distribution theory questions, David C . Ullrich, 09:48
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, David C . Ullrich, 09:44
- Re: binary linear operator, suresh, 09:38
- Re: Model Aircraft Design, Tim Duke, 09:37
- Re: Spherical geometry Proofs/derivations, Greg Egan, 09:25
- Spherical geometry, Greg Egan, 09:19
- Are all Latin squares group tables?, Hauke Reddmann, 08:59
- Re: Identical people in the same town, Justin, 08:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 08:57
- Re: combinatorial question, Ron Sperber, 08:30
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 08:01
- Re: shortest proof of shortest proof of shortest proof........, torkel, 07:52
- combinatorial question, olejman, 07:24
- combinatorial question, olejman, 07:24
- A question about projections, olejman, 07:19
- shortest proof of shortest proof of shortest proof........, gsax, 06:54
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Prai Jei, 06:46
- Re: Some Weyl group automorphisms, , 06:22
- Re: Two distribution theory questions, Stuart M Newberger, 05:59
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, , 05:48
- Re: Legendre Transform, Zigoteau, 05:35
- Re: binary linear operator, William Elliot, 05:22
- Re: Legendre Transform, Zigoteau, 05:04
- binary linear operator, suresh, 04:56
- Some Weyl group automorphisms, Jim Heckman, 03:39
- set of a set etc., William Elliot, 03:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 03:27
- Re: 2^n -1, quasi, 03:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 02:42
- Re: Identical people in the same town, Dave Rusin, 01:11
- Re: Euclidean Postulates II, Stuart M Newberger, 00:55
- Re: Recovering from a computational mathematics "education", Stuart M Newberger, 00:19
July 22, 2005
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, quasi, 23:27
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:22
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Dik T. Winter, 22:40
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Dik T. Winter, 22:25
- Recovering from a computational mathematics "education", D. Robbins, 22:25
- Re: u^2 - v^2 & u^2 + 2 v^2 both squares?, JoeS, 22:19
- Re: Identical people in the same town, Mike Speed, 20:47
- Re: Identical people in the same town, Mike Speed, 20:46
- 2^n -1, mina_world, 20:41
- Re: u^2 - v^2 & u^2 + 2 v^2 both squares?, Rick Decker, 20:40
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jiri Lebl, 20:29
- Re: Identical people in the same town, Jim Spriggs, 20:27
- Re: Identical people in the same town, Mike Speed, 20:00
- Re: Legendre Transform, Eric Gisse, 19:56
- Re: Upperbounds on the actualdensity of odd perfect numbers over the integers, Proginoskes, 19:10
- Re: Questions about co-np!, Proginoskes, 19:05
- Re: Proof that f(x) = ax + b is not a linear function! :), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:47
- Re: Movement of a circle in contact with a rotating ellipse., Robert Israel, 18:33
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, David C . Ullrich, 18:14
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, David C . Ullrich, 18:12
- Re: Model Aircraft Design, matt271829-news, 18:10
- combinatorics problem, Snis Pilbor, 18:06
- Re: Identical people in the same town, Alec McKenzie, 18:06
- Re: f(n,x,y) = (x^n - y^n) / (x - y) : can you divide it?, mmeron, 18:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), david petry, 18:03
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Jim Spriggs, 18:02
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Jim Spriggs, 17:57
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Alec McKenzie, 17:49
- Re: Identical people in the same town, Jim Spriggs, 17:48
- Identical people in the same town, Mike Speed, 17:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 17:28
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 16:59
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Robert Israel, 16:49
- Re: Proof that f(x) = ax + b is not a linear function! :), fernando revilla, 16:40
- Observations On Fermat's Last Theorem And Conclusion, Dr. Tarics, 16:38
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Robert Israel, 16:38
- Re: cool giant exactly solvable matrix equation!, Robert Israel, 16:21
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Michael Stemper, 16:20
- Re: Ellipse problems (or is it not an ellipse problem?), David W . Cantrell, 16:13
- Re: Convergence of a Crazy Series, martin cohen, 16:09
- Re: f(n,x,y) = (x^n - y^n) / (x - y) : can you divide it?, Robert Israel, 16:08
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Zdislav V. Kovarik, 15:58
- Re: Proof that f(x) = ax + b is not a linear function! :), Justin Young, 15:53
- Re: Difficult Integral - who can help?, Richard Mathar, 15:41
- Legendre Transform, Tobin Fricke, 15:21
- u^2 - v^2 & u^2 + 2 v^2 both squares?, Dale Shoults, 15:15
- Re: Historical remarks: Irrationality of e and Liouville, Jim Spriggs, 15:07
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, Dave Seaman, 14:18
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:13
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, Michael Stemper, 13:36
- Re: Proof that f(x) = ax + b is not a linear function! :), Adam, 13:33
- Re: Proof that f(x) = ax + b is not a linear function! :), Adam, 13:26
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 13:26
- Re: Proof that f(x) = ax + b is not a linear function! :), Ed Hook, 13:22
- Re: Proof that f(x) = ax + b is not a linear function! :), A N Niel, 13:20
- Re: Movement of a circle in contact with a rotating ellipse., Lynn Kurtz, 13:16
- Proof that f(x) = ax + b is not a linear function! :), Adam, 13:11
- Re: set of a set etc., Michael Stemper, 13:08
- Re: Motivation for matrix algebra, Adam, 13:03
- Re: A Priority Queueing Question with Bulk Arrival and Renein, Da, 13:02
- Re: Primes: are all odd primes (as factors) listed by 2^k-1 where k=2..inf, Gottfried Helms, 12:32
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:19
- Historical remarks: Irrationality of e and Liouville, Dave L. Renfro, 12:19
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jiri Lebl, 12:18
- Re: cool giant exactly solvable matrix equation!, Rusty, 12:05
- Re: Sarfatti Lectures in Warp Drive Physics 1, Uncle Al, 12:05
- Re: Primes: are all odd primes (as factors) listed by 2^k-1 where k=2..inf, achava, 11:55
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, , 11:39
- Re: Model Aircraft Design, Tim Duke, 11:37
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 11:25
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, scattered, 11:18
- cool giant exactly solvable matrix equation!, kentonyee, 11:13
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), David C . Ullrich, 11:05
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, David C . Ullrich, 11:02
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Herman Jurjus, 10:53
- Ellipse problems (or is it not an ellipse problem?), Jon Morris, 10:49
- Re: Primes: ar all odd primes (as factors) listed by 2^k-1 where k=2..inf, Rob Johnson, 10:47
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 10:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Torkel Franzen, 10:35
- Re: Fields as universal algebras?, scattered, 10:20
- Separable Linear Order, William Elliot, 10:15
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), David Kastrup, 10:09
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), David C . Ullrich, 10:02
- Re: Two distribution theory questions, David C . Ullrich, 09:54
- Re: When does this equation make sense?, Radford Neal, 09:49
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, David C . Ullrich, 09:42
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, David C . Ullrich, 09:41
- Re: Fractional derivatives, David C . Ullrich, 09:36
- Re: Fractional derivatives, David C . Ullrich, 09:35
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, David C . Ullrich, 09:27
- Re: Euclidean Postulates II, luiroto, 09:21
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 09:18
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, David C . Ullrich, 09:16
- Re: Primes: are all odd primes (as factors) listed by 2^k-1 where k=2..inf, Ed Hook, 09:15
- Primes: are all odd primes (as factors) listed by 2^k-1 where k=2..inf, Gottfried Helms, 08:59
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 08:55
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 08:44
- Re: f(n,x,y) = (x^n - y^n) / (x - y) : can you divide it?, G. A. Edgar, 08:44
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 08:42
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), G. A. Edgar, 08:29
- Re: f(n,x,y) = (x^n - y^n) / (x - y) : can you divide it?, john_ramsden, 08:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 08:14
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Little, 08:14
- Re: f(n,x,y) = (x^n - y^n) / (x - y) : can you divide it?, Torsten Hennig, 08:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 07:57
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Dik T. Winter, 07:53
- f(n,x,y) = (x^n - y^n) / (x - y) : can you divide it?, kentonyee, 07:46
- Re: Upperbounds on the actualdensity of odd perfect numbers over the integers, Pubkeybreaker, 07:46
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, David Kastrup, 07:16
- Product of fields in (Von Neumann) Regular rings., Jose Capco, 07:12
- Upperbounds on the actualdensity of odd perfect numbers over the integers, joseabdris, 07:09
- Spherical geometry Proofs/derivations, Zinc Potterman, 06:38
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Timothy Little, 06:34
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Dik T. Winter, 06:33
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Murphy, 06:27
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Murphy, 06:23
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, jmfbahciv, 06:08
- Difficult Integral - who can help?, mark, 06:00
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, , 05:00
- Re: Questions about co-np!, Crimsonelan, 04:50
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, jmfbahciv, 04:43
- Re: Movement of a circle in contact with a rotating ellipse., Lee, 04:42
- Re: about_sup, bodinsoul, 04:38
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Alec McKenzie, 04:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alec McKenzie, 04:21
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), David Kastrup, 04:18
- Re: A missing factor to solve a functional equation ., William Elliot, 04:18
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), David Kastrup, 04:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 04:10
- Re: Euclidean Postulates II, William Elliot, 04:09
- Re: about_sup, bodinsoul, 03:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:51
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 03:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 03:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:33
- about_sup, bodinsoul, 03:08
- Re: discriminating SO3 invariance from general O3 invariance, Ofek Shilon, 03:01
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, Darko Aleksic, 02:37
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Little, 02:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 01:59
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, gsax, 01:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 01:09
- tautochrone=brachistochrone, gsax, 01:01
- Re: Kaprekar's constant, gsax, 00:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 00:46
- Re: Number Theory problem: seeking Calculus example [LONG], Gerry Myerson, 00:45
- Re: Update: Objections to Cantor's Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 00:40
- Re: 0.99999 is not 1, Poker Joker, 00:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 00:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:11
- Re: Convergence of a Crazy Series, Kira Yamato, 00:00
July 21, 2005
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 23:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Poker Joker, 23:56
- Re: Convergence of a Crazy Series, Kira Yamato, 23:56
- Re: A question about planar graphs (graph theory), gangxu_csu, 23:46
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Robert Israel, 23:44
- Re: Number Theory problem: seeking Calculus example [LONG], Dave Rusin, 23:39
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Poker Joker, 23:31
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 23:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 23:01
- Re: Questions wrt computable order of numbers., Keith Ramsay, 22:29
- Re: set of a set etc., Mark lman, 21:15
- Sarfatti Lectures in Warp Drive Physics 1, Jack Sarfatti, 20:58
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Virgil, 20:47
- Re: Convergence of a Crazy Series, The World Wide Wade, 20:43
- Re: set of a set etc., Jasper, 20:42
- Re: Convergence of a Crazy Series, Robert Israel, 20:41
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), G . Frege, 20:40
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Little, 20:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 20:23
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 20:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 20:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 20:19
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Robert Kolker, 20:16
- Re: Questions wrt computable order of numbers., Timothy Little, 20:16
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Robert Kolker, 20:15
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Robert Kolker, 20:13
- Re: Convergence of a Crazy Series, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:12
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), David R Tribble, 20:08
- Re: 0.99999 is not 1, Tom Breton, 20:07
- Re: mathematica command, Don Taylor, 19:59
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, Butch Malahide, 19:57
- Convergence of a Crazy Series, Kira Yamato, 19:49
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, Mark Martin, 19:46
- Re: The Proper Way to put a long URL in a NG post, Proginoskes, 19:42
- Re: does anybody know how to remove the braces of a list in mathematica so it can be sendt as parameters to a function?, singau, 19:41
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, Proginoskes, 19:35
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 19:25
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Timothy Little, 19:23
- Re: Questions wrt computable order of numbers., Proginoskes, 19:23
- Re: mathematica command, Dave Seaman, 19:15
- Re: prime...., quasi, 19:13
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 19:01
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave L. Renfro, 18:54
- Re: Questions about co-np!, Proginoskes, 18:50
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:34
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), David Kastrup, 18:33
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Mark lman, 18:32
- Re: A little bit of History, Lee Rudolph, 18:31
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), David R Tribble, 18:11
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 18:11
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), José Carlos Santos, 18:11
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), G . Frege, 18:08
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, quasi, 18:07
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Mark lman, 18:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jeffrey Ketland, 18:00
- Re: Cardinality of N and P(N), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:00
- Re: A little bit of History, Robert Israel, 17:59
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, quasi, 17:56
- Cardinality of N and P(N), David R Tribble, 17:54
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, , 17:42
- Re: entire functions -, JEMebius, 17:39
- Re: conditional probability, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:38
- Re: problem about polynomial distribution of binomial distributions, Scoobidoo, 17:32
- Re: conditional probability, quasi, 17:23
- Re: Double limits at the infinity., Robert Israel, 17:16
- Re: Self-interest and other-interest, mathman, 17:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), G . Frege, 17:07
- Re: does anybody know how to remove the braces of a list in mathematica so it can be sendt as parameters to a function?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:04
- does anybody know how to remove the braces of a list in mathematica so it can be sendt as parameters to a function?, Scoobidoo, 17:01
- Re: problem about polynomial distribution of binomial distributions, Scoobidoo, 16:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 16:37
- A little bit of History, bischar, 16:37
- Re: Movement of a circle in contact with a rotating ellipse., Lynn Kurtz, 16:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jeffrey Ketland, 16:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 16:29
- Re: conditional probability, Butch Malahide, 16:26
- mathematica command, Scoobidoo, 16:24
- Re: Questions on log-normal distributions, Robert Israel, 16:19
- Euclidean Postulates II, luiroto, 16:11
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, Butch Malahide, 16:10
- Re: Double limits at the infinity., Amanda, 16:01
- Re: conditional probability, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:57
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, bischar, 15:47
- Re: problem about polynomial distribution of binomial distributions, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:46
- Questions on log-normal distributions, Brablo, 15:45
- Re: Finding the inverse solution to a non-linear differential equation, Robert Israel, 15:40
- Re: conditional probability, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 15:32
- Re: Kaprekar's constant, Robert Israel, 15:19
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, Mark lman, 15:18
- The Proper Way to put a long URL in a NG post, Norm Dresner, 15:16
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 15:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 15:12
- Questions wrt computable order of numbers., Ray Whitmer, 15:11
- Re: conditional probability, Scoobidoo, 15:10
- Re: problem about polynomial distribution of binomial distributions, Scoobidoo, 15:05
- Re: Spherical Trigonometry text, David Ames, 14:52
- Re: a question about multivariate function, Jos van Kan, 14:51
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, Robert Israel, 14:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 14:39
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, David Ames, 14:36
- Re: conditional probability, Tino, 14:28
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Michel Hack, 14:27
- Re: conditional probability, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:25
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, David Kastrup, 14:25
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 14:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:18
- Re: problem about polynomial distribution of binomial distributions, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:16
- Re: Fields as universal algebras?, Arturo Magidin, 14:15
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, double d, 14:14
- Re: Fields as universal algebras?, Arturo Magidin, 14:14
- Re: prime...., Arturo Magidin, 14:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 14:11
- conditional probability, Tino, 14:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jeffrey Ketland, 14:10
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:06
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 13:53
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 13:47
- Re: Fields as universal algebras?, Nathan, 13:39
- A missing factor to solve a functional equation ., alainverghote, 13:23
- Re: A question about planar graphs (graph theory), Keith A. Lewis, 13:18
- problem about polynomial distribution of binomial distributions, Scoobidoo, 13:10
- Re: Fields as universal algebras?, G. A. Edgar, 13:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 13:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 13:08
- Re: Fractional derivatives, A N Niel, 13:07
- Two distribution theory questions, James, 13:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 12:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jiri Lebl, 12:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jeffrey Ketland, 12:42
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jeffrey Ketland, 12:38
- Re: entire functions, David C . Ullrich, 12:34
- Re: Fractional derivatives, David C . Ullrich, 12:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 12:23
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Steven H. Cullinane, 12:21
- easy and fast way to make money and a lot..., hnhl, 12:18
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 12:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 12:06
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 12:05
- how to make money fast......, hnhl, 12:02
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 12:01
- Re: Fields as universal algebras?, scattered, 11:53
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, Uncle Al, 11:42
- Re: Spherical Trigonometry text, David A. Lamb, 11:35
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Jiri Lebl, 11:25
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 11:18
- Re: set of a set etc., Mark lman, 11:16
- Questions about co-np!, Crimsonelan, 11:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 11:15
- Re: An interesting problem, Keith A. Lewis, 11:08
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Dik T. Winter, 11:07
- Re: Fields as universal algebras?, Lee Rudolph, 11:03
- Re: Wanless' ?Fifth? Conjecture, James Wanless, 11:03
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, crankbuster, 11:01
- Re: Fractional derivatives, Lee Rudolph, 11:00
- Re: entire functions, Jannick Asmus, 10:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 10:56
- Re: Euclidean postulates, chasjac, 10:53
- discriminating SO3 invariance from general O3 invariance, Ofek Shilon, 10:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 10:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 10:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 10:37
- Re: proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, David C . Ullrich, 10:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 10:29
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!, 10:22
- Re: square mod, Tom St Denis, 10:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 10:10
- Re: square mod, Pubkeybreaker, 10:08
- Re: Wanless' ?Fifth? Conjecture, James Wanless, 10:03
- entire functions, Li Yi, 10:03
- Re: brachistochrone variations, Sam Wormley, 10:03
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Steven H. Cullinane, 09:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jeffrey Ketland, 09:56
- Fields as universal algebras?, Snis Pilbor, 09:44
- Re: Wanless' ?Fifth? Conjecture, James Wanless, 09:44
- Re: Double limits at the infinity., David C . Ullrich, 09:29
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 09:28
- Re: Fractional derivatives, David C . Ullrich, 09:22
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 09:21
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, David C . Ullrich, 09:21
- Re: Model Aircraft Design, matt271829-news, 09:14
- Re: prime...., stush, 09:13
- proved transcendental numbers (was: Transcendental Dimensions, G. A. Edgar, 09:11
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Murphy, 08:54
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Steven H. Cullinane, 08:46
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Dave Seaman, 08:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 08:39
- Re: compact operators, convergence pointwise / w.r.t. operator norm, David C . Ullrich, 08:34
- Re: Fractional derivatives, Timothy Murphy, 08:13
- Movement of a circle in contact with a rotating ellipse., Lee, 08:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 08:07
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 08:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 08:03
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Murphy, 08:02
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, crankbuster, 08:00
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Little, 07:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 07:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 07:53
- Double limits at the infinity., Jesús Cid-Sueiro, 07:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Peter Webb, 07:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 07:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 07:34
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:22
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Lee Rudolph, 07:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 07:06
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Steven H. Cullinane, 07:03
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, José Carlos Santos, 07:01
- Re: An interesting problem, Gottfried Helms, 07:00
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, José Carlos Santos, 06:59
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, gsax, 06:57
- Re: prime...., William Elliot, 06:53
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Lee Rudolph, 06:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 06:48
- prime...., mina_world, 06:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 06:21
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, alainverghote, 06:13
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Dik T. Winter, 06:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 06:03
- Re: Complex Random Variables - Help, Karl, 06:01
- Re: set of a set etc., William Elliot, 06:01
- Re: Estimation of extinction for thinned Poisson process, Rusty, 05:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:52
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Little, 05:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:44
- Re: To Google:, k wallace, 05:42
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 05:41
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 05:40
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 05:39
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, CWatters, 05:31
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, W. Dale Hall, 05:23
- Re: Transcendental Dimensions, Timothy Little, 05:17
- Re: set of a set etc., k wallace, 05:16
- Re: square mod, tum_, 04:55
- Re: Motivation for matrix algebra, Hagen, 04:54
- Complex Random Variables - Help, malghara, 04:53
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, Pyriform, 04:46
- Re: Model Aircraft Design, jan hauben, 04:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 04:09
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 04:03
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 03:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 03:34
- Re: a simple question, gsax, 03:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 03:07
- Re: Probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:53
- Re: What is the solution of that equation??, alain verghote, 02:51
- A question about planar graphs (graph theory), \"Gary Z.\", 02:46
- Transcendental Dimensions, gsax, 02:43
- Re: set of a set etc., Jasper, 02:41
- Finding the inverse solution to a non-linear differential equation, glenn_ramsey, 02:39
- Fractional derivatives, gsax, 02:35
- Re: square mod, ¬a\\/b, 02:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 02:34
- Re: Exact Trisecting, bassam king karzeddin, 02:33
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, quasi, 02:28
- Kaprekar's constant, gsax, 02:11
- Re: why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, Richard Henry, 02:09
- brachistochrone variations, gsax, 01:50
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, bassam king karzeddin, 01:49
- why did the Apollo missions all land in the same area?, double d, 01:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 01:44
- Re: Simple simplification, Kilgore, 01:36
- Re: Euclidean postulates, bassam king karzeddin, 01:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 01:36
- Re: 5_subjects, quasi, 01:33
- Re: Check out which site is going to the top?, Proginoskes, 01:25
- Re: 5_subjects, Proginoskes, 01:24
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 01:22
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 01:20
- Re: set of a set etc., Mark lman, 01:16
- Re: Check out which site is going to the top?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Barb Knox, 01:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 01:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 01:00
- Re: 0.99999 is not 1, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:54
- Re: set of a set etc., William Elliot, 00:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:51
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, quasi, 00:45
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, Butch Malahide, 00:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:43
- automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, quasi, 00:41
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, Robert Israel, 00:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Barb Knox, 00:30
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:27
- Re: square mod, Dana, 00:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:13
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 00:10
- Re: set of a set etc., bischar, 00:01
July 20, 2005
- Re: set of a set etc., Jasper, 23:54
- Re: set of a set etc., G . Frege, 23:51
- Re: Check out which site is going to the top?, Gerry Myerson, 23:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 23:40
- Re: set of a set etc., Jasper, 23:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:24
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, quasi, 23:15
- Re: set of a set etc., bischar, 23:10
- A Priority Queueing Question with Bulk Arrival and Renein, Da, 23:09
- Re: 0.99999 is not 1, Tom Breton, 23:02
- Re: set of a set etc., stush, 23:01
- Re: 5_subjects, matthias, 23:00
- Re: automorphisms of subspaces of the reals, matthias, 22:47
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 22:37
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 22:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 22:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 22:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 21:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 21:52
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 21:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Martin Shobe, 21:36
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 21:33
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 21:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 21:18
- Re: Check out which site is going to the top?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:18
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, quasi, 21:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 21:06
- Re: Looking for a closed form for this!, quasi, 21:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 21:01
- 5_subjects, bodinsoul, 21:00
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 20:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), W. Dale Hall, 20:58
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 20:42
- Re: Model Aircraft Design, jan hauben, 20:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jeffrey Ketland, 20:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 20:19
- Re: Where's Robin Chapman hese days?, Gerry Myerson, 20:18
- Re: Check out which site is going to the top?, Gerry Myerson, 20:17
- Linear differential equation, carlos5100, 20:12
- Re: about countable set...., mina_world, 20:10
- Re: algebraic question, Gerry Myerson, 20:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 20:01
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 19:58
- Re: Simple simplification, William Elliot, 19:52
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, gerard46, 19:51
- Re: a simple question, William Elliot, 19:46
- Re: compact operators, convergence pointwise / w.r.t. operator norm, Markus Sigg, 19:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 19:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 19:40
- Re: Tensor Products of Vector Spaces: Need Help in Understanding, Per Vognsen, 19:39
- Re: Model Aircraft Design, Tim Duke, 19:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jeffrey Ketland, 19:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alan Morgan, 19:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 19:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 19:18
- Re: What is the solution of that equation??, Roman B. Binder, 19:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 19:14
- Re: x^x = e^y, David W . Cantrell, 19:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 19:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 19:08
- Re: Another mapping cylinder question.,, W. Dale Hall, 19:06
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, cbrown, 18:55
- Re: Tensor Products of Vector Spaces: Need Help in Understanding, Maheshwaran Srinivasan, 18:52
- x^x = e^y, micromysore, 18:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 18:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 18:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 18:48
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 18:45
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 18:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 18:43
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 18:40
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 18:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 18:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 18:30
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 18:29
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, gerard46, 18:26
- Re: logically equivalent, Timothy Little, 18:05
- Re: jacobian required?, quasi, 17:56
- Re: Linear recurrence: Fat men sitting at a bar, Timothy Little, 17:55
- Re: jacobian required?, quasi, 17:54
- Re: An interesting problem, achava, 17:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), hale, 17:47
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, Robert Israel, 17:41
- Re: set of a set etc., quasi, 17:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 17:18
- Re: Tensor Products of Vector Spaces: Need Help in Understanding, Lee Rudolph, 17:08
- Re: Tensor Products of Vector Spaces: Need Help in Understanding, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:08
- Re: Tensor Products of Vector Spaces: Need Help in Understanding, Jannick Asmus, 17:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 17:02
- Re: set of a set etc., G . Frege, 17:01
- Re: set of a set etc., stush, 16:58
- Re: Looking for a closed form for this!, Dave Rusin, 16:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 16:54
- Re: set of a set etc., stush, 16:52
- Re: set of a set etc., G . Frege, 16:51
- Re: Tensor Products of Vector Spaces: Need Help in Understanding, Timothy Murphy, 16:47
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 16:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:40
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, G . Frege, 16:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 16:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 16:32
- Re: set of a set etc., G . Frege, 16:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:32
- Re: Model Aircraft Design, matt271829-news, 16:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 16:27
- Re: about countable set...., quasi, 16:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:26
- Re: An interesting problem, Gottfried Helms, 16:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:22
- Re: set of a set etc., G . Frege, 16:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 16:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 16:12
- Tensor Products of Vector Spaces: Need Help in Understanding, Maheshwaran Srinivasan, 16:11
- Re: algebraic question, quasi, 16:06
- Re: An interesting problem, achava, 16:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 16:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dave Rusin, 16:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 16:00
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 15:59
- Re: jacobian required?, Puppet_Sock, 15:58
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 15:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 15:55
- Re: An interesting problem, Gottfried Helms, 15:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 15:51
- Re: What is the solution of that equation??, quasi, 15:50
- Re: What is the solution of that equation??, David Moran, 15:43
- Re: Looking for a closed form for this!, Nathan, 15:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 15:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:33
- Re: arguing with idiots, quasi, 15:29
- Re: An interesting problem, Mark lman, 15:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 15:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:21
- Re: set of a set etc., Mark lman, 15:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 15:19
- Re: An interesting problem, Keith A. Lewis, 15:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 15:01
- Re: 0.99999 is not 1, quasi, 14:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 14:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 14:51
- Re: algebraic question, quasi, 14:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:46
- Re: An interesting problem, achava, 14:46
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, aeo6, 14:43
- Re: algebraic question, quasi, 14:42
- An interesting problem, achava, 14:41
- Re: set of a set etc., Jasper, 14:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 14:39
- Re: Without choice, can I compare cardinals to 2?, Herman Rubin, 14:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:38
- Re: jacobian required?, Rudy, 14:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 14:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:35
- Re: To Google:, John Smith, 14:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:26
- Re: Exact Trisecting, Robert Israel, 14:25
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 14:24
- Re: 0.99999 is not 1, David W . Cantrell, 14:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 14:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 14:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 14:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:20
- Re: set of a set etc., Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:18
- Re: set of a set etc., Dave Seaman, 14:16
- Re: algebraic question, quasi, 14:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 14:12
- Re: Without choice, can I compare cardinals to 2?, Dave Seaman, 14:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 14:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:05
- Re: set of a set etc., Jasper, 14:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 14:01
- Re: about countable set...., quasi, 14:00
- Re: set of a set etc., G . Frege, 13:59
- Re: Looking for a closed form for this!, Dan, 13:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 13:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:57
- Re: set of a set etc., Jasper, 13:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 13:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:53
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 13:48
- Re: Without choice, can I compare cardinals to 2?, A N Niel, 13:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 13:45
- Re: Without choice, can I compare cardinals to 2?, Dave Seaman, 13:45
- Re: arguing with idiots, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 13:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 13:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 13:31
- Re: Without choice, can I compare cardinals to 2?, David Lehavi, 13:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 13:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), malbrain, 13:17
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Steven H. Cullinane, 13:16
- Re: What is the solution of that equation??, jan hauben, 13:15
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, Dave Seaman, 13:12
- Re: Book on Moving Dimensions Theory Due Out in Fall 05. Why is the speed of light constant in all frames? Why are light and energy quantized? Why are there non-local effects in quantum mechanics? 4th dimension expanding relative to 3 spatial dimensions, jollyrogership, 13:11
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 13:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alan Morgan, 13:03
- Re: Make easy money with Paypal! Do the math!, karlsen, 13:00
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, franlorin, 12:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 12:54
- Without choice, can I compare cardinals to 2?, Snis Pilbor, 12:48
- Re: square mod, Tom St Denis, 12:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 12:45
- Re: square mod, tum_, 12:41
- What is the solution of that equation??, wartki, 12:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 12:34
- Re: Looking for a closed form for this!, Rick Decker, 12:30
- Re: Looking for a closed form for this!, Dan, 12:29
- Re: Motivation for matrix algebra, Adam, 12:28
- Re: Looking for a closed form for this!, Ed Hook, 12:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 12:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 12:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 12:18
- Re: square mod, Keith A. Lewis, 12:15
- Re: Mews Square Mode ..., David Eather, 12:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 12:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 12:07
- Re: algebraic question, , 12:06
- Re: Model Aircraft Design, Keith A. Lewis, 12:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 12:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:58
- Re: Mews Square Mode ..., Twittering One, 11:57
- Re: Efficient Computation of MOD's or DIVs of specific numbers, M.J.T. Guy, 11:55
- Re: Mews Square Mode ..., Twittering One, 11:54
- Re: Mews Square Mode ..., Twittering One, 11:50
- Re: algebraic question, Johanna Bernstein, 11:47
- Mews Square Mode ..., Twittering One, 11:47
- Re: Model Aircraft Design, M.J.T. Guy, 11:45
- Re: algebraic question, Pubkeybreaker, 11:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:44
- Re: algebraic question, Johanna Bernstein, 11:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:38
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, Dave Seaman, 11:36
- Re: Euclidean postulates, A N Niel, 11:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:34
- optimization problem in L_2, SMZ, 11:34
- Re: algebraic question, Johanna Bernstein, 11:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 11:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:29
- Re: To Google:, john_ramsden, 11:26
- Re: arguing with idiots, mathedman, 11:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 11:25
- Re: 0.99999 is not 1, mathedman, 11:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:24
- Re: square mod, Tom St Denis, 11:22
- Re: algebraic question, Pubkeybreaker, 11:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 11:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 11:09
- Re: Linear recurrence: Fat men sitting at a bar, M.J.T. Guy, 11:06
- Re: square mod, tum_, 11:06
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Daryl McCullough, 11:05
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, crankbuster, 11:00
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 10:53
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:51
- Re: summation, mao, 10:48
- Re: about countable set...., Ed Hook, 10:47
- algebraic question, Johanna Bernstein, 10:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 10:41
- Re: Looking for a closed form for this!, Larry Lard, 10:38
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, Keith A. Lewis, 10:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:28
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), examachine, 10:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:18
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 10:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 10:01
- Re: Cone in a groove, David W . Cantrell, 09:50
- Euclidean postulates, bassam king karzeddin, 09:41
- Re: logically equivalent, Owen, 09:40
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, franlorin, 09:27
- Re: To Google:, David C . Ullrich, 09:25
- Re: To Google:, David C . Ullrich, 09:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 09:19
- Re: compact operators, convergence pointwise / w.r.t. operator norm, David C . Ullrich, 09:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 09:08
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, bassam king karzeddin, 09:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David C . Ullrich, 09:05
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 09:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David C . Ullrich, 08:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Michael Stemper, 08:55
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 08:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jean-Claude Arbaut, 08:46
- Re: set of a set etc., Dave Seaman, 08:41
- Re: To Google:, Dik T. Winter, 08:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), georgie, 08:31
- Re: Check out which site is going to the top?, G. A. Edgar, 08:24
- Re: Cone in a groove, matt271829-news, 08:24
- Re: logically equivalent, A N Niel, 08:20
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 08:18
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 08:15
- Re: Rotations of T,N,B vector triad in a loop, sim_stef, 08:11
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Dik T. Winter, 08:05
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:05
- about countable set...., mina_world, 08:05
- Looking for a closed form for this!, Dan, 08:04
- Re: square mod, Tom St Denis, 08:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:59
- Re: a simple question, Timothy Little, 07:52
- logically equivalent, junior_learner, 07:41
- Re: Relative Cardinality, fiesh, 07:38
- Book on Moving Dimensions Theory Due Out in Fall 05. Why is the speed of light constant in all frames? Why are light and energy quantized? Why are there non-local effects in quantum mechanics? 4th dimension expanding relative to 3 spatial dimensions, greatbooksclassics, 07:26
- Re: Simple simplification, Kilgore, 07:25
- Re: Cone in a groove, Narasimham, 07:18
- Re: Lebesgue Measure, bryant_j_j, 07:03
- Re: square mod, Timothy Little, 06:55
- Re: Simple simplification, William Elliot, 06:54
- Re: arguing with idiots, OnlyRH, 06:53
- Re: Simple simplification, Timothy Little, 06:53
- a simple question, gsax, 06:50
- Re: A simple prime problem!, Dan, 06:49
- Lebesgue Measure, OnlyRH, 06:48
- Re:Trisecting an arbitrary angle, bassam king karzeddin, 06:48
- Re: Cone in a groove, john_ramsden, 06:41
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 06:31
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 06:26
- Re: Simple simplification, jan hauben, 06:16
- Re: Rotations of T,N,B vector triad in a loop, Narasimham, 06:12
- Re: Check out which site is going to the top?, Kilgore, 05:58
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 05:50
- Simple simplification, Kilgore, 05:46
- Re: compact operators, convergence pointwise / w.r.t. operator norm, Markus Sigg, 05:35
- Re: Prime Matrices, William Elliot, 05:33
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 05:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:23
- Re: Cone in a groove, matt271829-news, 05:21
- Re: Topological sums and attaching, William Elliot, 05:20
- Re: square mod, Twittering One, 05:17
- Re: square mod, Twittering One, 05:15
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 05:12
- Re: square mod, Twittering One, 05:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:08
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions -, bischar, 05:03
- square mod, (not a)\\/b, 05:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 05:01
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, jmfbahciv, 04:57
- Re: Where's Robin Chapman hese days?, Jeremy Boden, 04:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:56
- Re: Where's Robin Chapman hese days?, john_ramsden, 04:53
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:50
- Re: Bizarritudes, john_ramsden, 04:49
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 04:48
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions -, bischar, 04:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:34
- Re: Radius of convergence, quasi, 04:29
- Re: Cone in a groove, john_ramsden, 04:27
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 04:23
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 04:23
- Re: arguing with idiots, quasi, 04:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 03:54
- Re: Prime Matrices, Hagen, 03:42
- Re: set of a set etc., William Elliot, 03:36
- Re: set of a set etc., William Elliot, 03:35
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 03:32
- Re: red is green, William Elliot, 03:31
- Re: To Google:, Eric Gisse, 03:25
- Re: 0.99999 is not 1, Robert Low, 03:16
- Re: Exact Trisecting, bassam king karzeddin, 03:13
- Re: To Google:, David Kastrup, 03:13
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 03:07
- Re: To Google:, Damien, 03:03
- Re: 0.99999 is not 1, William Elliot, 02:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 02:46
- Re: perfect numbers, Keith Ramsay, 02:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 02:30
- Re: Square roots, Christer Ericson, 02:29
- Re: 0.99999 is not 1, The Ghost In The Machine, 02:00
- Check out which site is going to the top?, xmax, 01:58
- Re: arguing with idiots, Proginoskes, 01:58
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, Proginoskes, 01:49
- Re: To Google:, Proginoskes, 01:43
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions -, Dave Rusin, 01:43
- Re: A simple prime problem!, Virgil, 01:39
- Re: Spherical Trigonometry text, Michael Jørgensen, 01:37
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Proginoskes, 01:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 01:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 01:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 01:20
- red is green, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 01:17
- Radius of convergence, Herb, 01:14
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions -, Gerry Myerson, 01:13
- Re: Idea behind Schemes (Algeb. Geom.), Keith Ramsay, 01:01
- Re: To Google:, double d, 01:00
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), G . Frege, 00:54
- Re: To Google:, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), imaginatorium, 00:48
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, gsax, 00:36
- Re: arguing with idiots, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:14
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 00:04
July 19, 2005
- Re: Cone in a groove, David W . Cantrell, 23:50
- arguing with idiots, quasi, 23:49
- Mathematical Movie!!! Tied Up & Strung Out:: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!!, greatbooksclassics, 23:26
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions -, bischar, 23:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 23:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 22:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 22:45
- Re: Topological sums and attaching, James, 22:44
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Gerry Myerson, 22:44
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:35
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Barb Knox, 22:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:23
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 22:19
- Re: arguing with idiots, dredgo, 22:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 22:09
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, Math Freak, 22:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 22:03
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 21:51
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 21:51
- Re: A simple prime problem!, Dan, 21:46
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Martin Shobe, 21:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 21:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 21:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 21:36
- Re: arguing with idiots, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 21:31
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Lawrence House, 21:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dik T. Winter, 21:20
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 21:07
- Re: A simple prime problem!, Dana, 21:02
- Re: Factorials and exponents, Gerry Myerson, 20:58
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions -, Gerry Myerson, 20:55
- Model Aircraft Design, Tim Duke, 20:54
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 20:51
- Re: Bizarritudes, Gerry Myerson, 20:40
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Lee Rudolph, 20:39
- Re: A different RSA challenge, Gerry Myerson, 20:37
- Re: A simple prime problem!, Dan, 20:35
- A simple prime problem!, Dan, 20:29
- Re: Prime Matrices, Gerry Myerson, 20:27
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Gerry Myerson, 20:25
- Re: Diameter and length?, Ken Pledger, 20:20
- Re: summation, quasi, 20:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Rick Decker, 20:16
- Proof of Sonine-Polya theorem, atuldixit83, 20:11
- Re: calculation in groups, Gerry Myerson, 20:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 20:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), stephen, 19:58
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, Dave Seaman, 19:52
- Re: perfect numbers, Brendan O'Sullivan, 19:52
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 19:46
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Math Freak, 19:44
- calculation in groups, Johanna Bernstein, 19:39
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 19:38
- Re: Rings problem, quasi, 19:22
- Re: Square roots, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 19:20
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 19:19
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 19:18
- Re: Sum of 2 Squares in Different Ways = S, (...), JEMebius, 19:08
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 19:00
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 18:47
- Re: Sum of 2 Squares in Different Ways = S, (...), Timothy Murphy, 18:39
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, franlorin, 18:37
- Re: summation, quasi, 18:36
- Re: compact operators, convergence pointwise / w.r.t. operator norm, Markus Sigg, 18:33
- Re: 0.99999 is not 1, Chan-Ho Suh, 18:31
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 18:31
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, Keith A. Lewis, 18:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Barb Knox, 18:26
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 18:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chan-Ho Suh, 18:18
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chan-Ho Suh, 18:18
- Re: set of a set etc., G . Frege, 18:17
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, abe . buckingham, 18:14
- Re: set of a set etc., G . Frege, 18:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alec McKenzie, 18:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Timothy Little, 18:01
- Re: summation, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 18:00
- Re: Linear recurrence: Fat men sitting at a bar, Gib Bogle, 17:59
- Re: Linear recurrence: Fat men sitting at a bar, matt271829-news, 17:58
- Re: 0.99999 is not 1, David Kastrup, 17:51
- Re: Inverse function question:, The World Wide Wade, 17:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), G . Frege, 17:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dave Rusin, 17:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 17:45
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chan-Ho Suh, 17:43
- 0.99999 is not 1, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:42
- Re: set of a set etc., Jasper, 17:41
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), G . Frege, 17:40
- Re: Rings problem, style, 17:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 17:38
- Re: Series Involving Modified Bessel Functions, Robert Israel, 17:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 17:36
- Re: set of a set etc., Jasper, 17:33
- Re: To Google:, William Elliot, 17:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 17:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alec McKenzie, 17:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chan-Ho Suh, 17:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 17:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), david petry, 17:25
- Re: Square roots, Dave Rusin, 17:25
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), G . Frege, 17:24
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 17:24
- Re: set of a set etc., William Elliot, 17:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 17:23
- Re: Inverse function question:, Jane, 17:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alan Morgan, 17:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chan-Ho Suh, 17:18
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Herman Rubin, 17:17
- Re: Prime Matrices, William Elliot, 17:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 17:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 17:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), david petry, 17:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 17:12
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 17:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 17:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 17:10
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), The World Wide Wade, 17:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 17:08
- Re: set of a set etc., William Elliot, 17:08
- Re: Topological sums and attaching, William Elliot, 17:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), david petry, 17:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 17:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 17:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), david petry, 17:02
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Herman Rubin, 17:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:59
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, G . Frege, 16:58
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 16:54
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, JoeS, 16:53
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:53
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, JoeS, 16:51
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, Virgil, 16:48
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, G . Frege, 16:44
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, Virgil, 16:40
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alec McKenzie, 16:31
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:24
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 16:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), The World Wide Wade, 16:20
- Re: Where's Robin Chapman hese days?, Rick Decker, 16:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 16:17
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, gerard46, 16:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 16:15
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 16:14
- Re: Inverse function question:, The World Wide Wade, 16:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alec McKenzie, 16:14
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 16:13
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, David Kastrup, 16:12
- Re: Mapping cylinder question.., Ed Hook, 16:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 16:10
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 16:08
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 16:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 16:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:02
- Re: Since the Sudoku fad arrived in Germany..., , 16:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 16:00
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 15:59
- Re: Spherical Trigonometry text, T Rig, 15:59
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 15:59
- Rings problem, style, 15:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 15:57
- Re: summation, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:54
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, Bob, 15:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:50
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 15:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:47
- Inverse function question:, Jane, 15:43
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 15:42
- Re: Spherical Trigonometry text, Dave Seaman, 15:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:40
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 15:39
- Re: Cobwebs, enki, 15:38
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:36
- Re: Cone in a groove, matt271829-news, 15:36
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 15:34
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, Proginoskes, 15:34
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:34
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 15:30
- Re: Efficient Computation of MOD's or DIVs of specific numbers, Raymond Manzoni, 15:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 15:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chris Menzel, 15:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chan-Ho Suh, 15:24
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 15:23
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 15:21
- Series Involving Modified Bessel Functions, Brenneman, 15:21
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chan-Ho Suh, 15:17
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 15:15
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chan-Ho Suh, 15:14
- Re: set of a set etc., G . Frege, 15:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Low, 15:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chan-Ho Suh, 15:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chan-Ho Suh, 15:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:11
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, JEMebius, 15:08
- Spherical Trigonometry text, David A. Lamb, 15:07
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 15:06
- Re: Linear recurrence: Fat men sitting at a bar, double d, 15:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 14:59
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:58
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:56
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 14:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:50
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions -, bischar, 14:48
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:46
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:43
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions --, bischar, 14:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), aeo6, 14:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:35
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:35
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:32
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Kevin Delaney, 14:31
- Cobwebs, ibshambat2004, 14:30
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:23
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:22
- To Google:, gb7648, 14:19
- Re: " Solving : f( d/dx (f(x)) - x) = 1/(2*x^2) - ln(x) ", alainverghote, 14:16
- Re: set of a set etc., Jean-Claude Arbaut, 14:11
- Re: Cone in a groove, john_ramsden, 13:59
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, briggs, 13:59
- Re: Cone in a groove, john_ramsden, 13:56
- Re: set of a set etc., A N Niel, 13:55
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, williammaw, 13:49
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, williammaw, 13:31
- Re: set of a set etc., Dave Seaman, 13:29
- Re: Where's Robin Chapman hese days?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 13:24
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Steven H. Cullinane, 13:17
- Re: Can you verify that?, alain verghote, 13:15
- Re: Can you verify that?, alain verghote, 13:14
- Re: summation, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 13:13
- Re: Factorials and exponents, bischar, 13:09
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions -, JEMebius, 13:06
- Re: stumped on integral, Rob Johnson, 13:06
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, matt271829-news, 13:06
- Re: summation, achava, 13:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), The World Wide Wade, 13:03
- Re: Factorials and exponents, bischar, 13:01
- Re: [NEW] Category of Objects and Classes - abstract math + problem, Jim Spriggs, 13:00
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:55
- Re: Geometric proof of binomial theorem, Ed Hook, 12:54
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Michael Stemper, 12:53
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 12:50
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 12:47
- summation, mao, 12:47
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions -, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 12:39
- Re: Square roots, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 12:37
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alec McKenzie, 12:33
- Re: Square roots - decimal expansions -, bischar, 12:33
- Re: Mapping cylinder question.., James, 12:31
- Re: A different RSA challenge, Dan, 12:30
- Another mapping cylinder question.,, James, 12:29
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 12:28
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, crankbuster, 12:25
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:25
- Re: set of a set etc., Jasper, 12:24
- Hilbert 16th Problem As A PDE Problem As A Physical Problem As A (Spectral) geometric Problem,As A Foliation Problem, Ali Taghavi, 12:23
- Re: Diameter and length?, 888, 12:21
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:21
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 12:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alec McKenzie, 12:19
- Re: Physics... math problem, Lynn Kurtz, 12:18
- Re: Mapping cylinder question.., Ed Hook, 12:17
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Keith A. Lewis, 12:16
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Jiri Lebl, 12:16
- Re: Diameter and length?, 888, 12:16
- Re: What calculus text should I cite for l'Hopital's Rule?, Jeremy Boden, 12:12
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Richard Tobin, 12:02
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Kevin Delaney, 11:57
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:51
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:46
- Re: Efficient Computation of MOD's or DIVs of specific numbers, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 11:42
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jiri Lebl, 11:42
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 11:41
- Re: Inconsistent sets, David Kastrup, 11:40
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 11:38
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:38
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, David Kastrup, 11:37
- Geometric proof of binomial theorem, Ann Chance, 11:35
- RE POST HOT NASEEM JAFFER, naseemjafferinshower, 11:35
- Re: Efficient Computation of MOD's or DIVs of specific numbers, Keith A. Lewis, 11:32
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:30
- Re: Mapping cylinder question.., James, 11:30
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:26
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:22
- Re: set of a set etc., Jean-Claude Arbaut, 11:20
- Linear recurrence: Fat men sitting at a bar, David Radcliffe, 11:19
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:16
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:14
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Patrick, 11:11
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 11:10
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Mark Martin, 11:08
- Re: What calculus text should I cite for l'Hopital's Rule?, A N Niel, 11:08
- Re: set of a set etc., Jasper, 11:07
- Re: stumped on integral, A N Niel, 11:07
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 11:04
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 11:04
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 11:03
- Re: Mapping cylinder question.., Ed Hook, 11:01
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Richard Henry, 11:00
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, Richard Henry, 10:58
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 10:58
- Re: set of a set etc., Jean-Claude Arbaut, 10:58
- Re: Simulating multiple correlated random variables - Excel/VBA, scattered, 10:58
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jean-Claude Arbaut, 10:57
- set of a set etc., Jasper, 10:55
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, Wiebe, 10:54
- Aczel-erated goof, Hauke Reddmann, 10:43
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, bassam king karzeddin, 10:37
- Re: Since the Sudoku fad arrived in Germany..., Hauke Reddmann, 10:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 10:29
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 10:27
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, quasi, 10:25
- Re: amicable & sociable numbers, matt271829-news, 10:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jean-Claude Arbaut, 10:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 10:20
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jean-Claude Arbaut, 10:16
- Re: analysis problem, alexandru . lupas, 10:15
- Re: Physics... math problem, Jeremy Boden, 10:13
- Re: Diameter and length?, matt271829-news, 10:11
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jean-Claude Arbaut, 10:10
- Re: Diameter and length?, bycol, 10:08
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, aeo6, 10:05
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Ross A. Finlayson, 10:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alec McKenzie, 09:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 09:55
- Re:Trisecting an arbitrary angle, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 09:55
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 09:54
- Re : Trisecting an arbitrary angle, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 09:54
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 09:52
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David C . Ullrich, 09:51
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, aeo6, 09:50
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 09:43
- Re: Exact Trisecting, quasi, 09:34
- Re: Prime Matrices, Hagen, 09:33
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Mark Martin, 09:32
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, David Kastrup, 09:31
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, bassam king karzeddin, 09:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 09:27
- Re: Diameter and length?, William Elliot, 09:26
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Han de Bruijn, 09:24
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Michael Stemper, 09:24
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, David Kastrup, 09:23
- Re: Continuous bijections, Michael Stemper, 09:22
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), torkel, 09:21
- Re: Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function, jan hauben, 09:18
- Re: Continuous bijections, Michael Stemper, 09:16
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alec McKenzie, 09:15
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Lee Rudolph, 09:13
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 09:09
- Re: Topological sums and attaching, James, 09:08
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 09:08
- Re: Cone in a groove, matt271829-news, 09:05
- Diameter and length?, 888, 09:04
- Mapping cylinder question.., James, 08:55
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 08:51
- Re: Exact Trisecting, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 08:50
- Prime Matrices, William Elliot, 08:49
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alec McKenzie, 08:43
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 08:42
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:36
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Jesse F. Hughes, 08:36
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Jesse F. Hughes, 08:33
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 08:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David C . Ullrich, 08:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 08:23
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:22
- Since the Sudoku fad arrived in Germany..., Hauke Reddmann, 08:19
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), torkel, 08:15
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han de Bruijn, 08:13
- Re: symbolic solution of complex roots, Lee Rudolph, 08:09
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), sradhakr, 08:08
- Re: compact operators, convergence pointwise / w.r.t. operator norm, Jakob Creutzig, 08:06
- Re: symbolic solution of complex roots, Ben, 08:03
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 08:02
- Re: Euclidean geometry -- isometries or similarities?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 07:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dave Seaman, 07:48
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, David Kastrup, 07:42
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, David Kastrup, 07:41
- Re: Prime Matrices, Hagen, 07:12
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 07:04
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Han de Bruijn, 07:03
- Re: Prime Matrices, Hagen, 07:02
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Han de Bruijn, 06:59
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 06:52
- Re: Euclidean geometry -- isometries or similarities?, jg . campbell . ng, 06:52
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 06:46
- Re: compact operators, convergence pointwise / w.r.t. operator norm, Markus Sigg, 06:45
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Dik T. Winter, 06:43
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 06:41
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, Jutta Gut, 06:37
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, jmfbahciv, 06:28
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, bassam king karzeddin, 06:28
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 06:22
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:20
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 06:16
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Herman Jurjus, 06:10
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Han de Bruijn, 06:07
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, David Kastrup, 06:03
- Re: Sum of 2 Squares in Different Ways = S, a Product of r [r >= 2] number of Primes, Sundar Krishnan, 05:55
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, bassam king karzeddin, 05:54
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:50
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, Ken Oliver, 05:47
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:44
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:42
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:39
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:37
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Han de Bruijn, 05:35
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:34
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:30
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, David Kastrup, 05:27
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Han de Bruijn, 05:25
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, John Gilmer, 05:15
- Re: Topological sums and attaching, William Elliot, 05:13
- Re: question about incidence axioms, Herman Jurjus, 05:12
- Re: Topological sums and attaching, Ulysse Keller, 05:10
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Jesse F. Hughes, 05:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 04:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Barb Knox, 04:55
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Han de Bruijn, 04:51
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 04:51
- Re: Motivation for matrix algebra, Hagen, 04:44
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:39
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Alec McKenzie, 04:34
- Re: Why is the universe expansion accelerating?, john_ramsden, 04:33
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, jmfbahciv, 04:32
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, jmfbahciv, 04:27
- Cone in a groove, Gary Wooding, 04:17
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:16
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, quasi, 04:10
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Jesse F. Hughes, 04:01
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 03:57
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 03:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Jesse F. Hughes, 03:41
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 03:31
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 03:29
- Re: analysis problem, alexandru . lupas, 03:24
- Re: Prime Matrices, Timothy Little, 03:23
- Re: Prime Matrices, William Elliot, 03:23
- Re: [NEW] Category of Objects and Classes - abstract math + problem, William Elliot, 03:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), quasi, 03:10
- amicable & sociable numbers, gsax, 03:04
- Re: interpolate polynom, Gerry Myerson, 03:04
- Re: Prime Matrices, Gerry Myerson, 02:48
- Re: A different RSA challenge, Gerry Myerson, 02:44
- Re: Bizarritudes, Gerry Myerson, 02:39
- Re: Factorials and exponents, Gerry Myerson, 02:36
- Re: Book recommendation for Polya Theory?, Gerry Myerson, 02:31
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, bryant_j_j, 02:30
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Konrad Viltersten, 02:26
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Chan-Ho Suh, 02:24
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, quasi, 02:10
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 02:10
- Re: uniform convergence question, The World Wide Wade, 02:08
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 02:07
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 02:05
- [NEW] Category of Objects and Classes - abstract math + problem, Victor Porton, 01:56
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), David Kastrup, 01:53
- Re: Proof schemas or strategies (references collecting ...), Jose Capco, 01:33
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Helene . Boucher, 01:26
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, k wallace, 00:40
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 00:38
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Martin Shobe, 00:29
- uniform convergence question, Herb, 00:22
- Re: Motivation for matrix algebra, Daniel McLaury, 00:20
- RE POST NASEEM HOT JAFFER, naseemjafferinshower, 00:18
- Re: Vitali's covering theorem, Dave L. Renfro, 00:17
- Re: A Reverse Integer Triangle, Consecutive Integer Sums, And Potential Primes, rer, 00:12
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Dave L. Renfro, 00:02
July 18, 2005
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), quasi, 23:59
- Idea behind Schemes (Algeb. Geom.), Jose Capco, 23:52
- Re: analysis problem, Peter L. Montgomery, 23:49
- Re: stumped on integral, Jose Capco, 23:48
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Martin Shobe, 23:36
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:28
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 23:27
- Re: Efficient Computation of MOD's or DIVs of specific numbers, Peter L. Montgomery, 23:24
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), The World Wide Wade, 23:21
- Re: Vitali's covering theorem, Li Yi, 23:19
- nonlinear operators (case of the exponential function), 110, 23:14
- Re: mixture problem, David Moran, 23:12
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 23:06
- Re: Vitali's covering theorem, Dave L. Renfro, 23:06
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:58
- Re: Motivation for matrix algebra, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:57
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Jim Spriggs, 22:42
- Re: Estimation of extinction for thinned Poisson process, Karl, 22:34
- mixture problem, doki_pen, 22:34
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Jim Spriggs, 22:32
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Alan Morgan, 22:20
- Re: compact operators, convergence pointwise / w.r.t. operator norm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:58
- Vitali's covering theorem, Li Yi, 21:51
- Re: Efficient Computation of MOD's or DIVs of specific numbers, Collins Williams, 21:49
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:46
- Re: Motivation for matrix algebra, vsgdp, 21:44
- Motivation for matrix algebra, Adam, 21:36
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:33
- Re: closed form for convolution of a^n with Fibonacci numbers, hawkmoon269, 21:33
- Re: probability theory applied to theology, Rouben Rostamian, 21:19
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 21:17
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:16
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Robert Kolker, 21:12
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Robert Kolker, 21:05
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 21:05
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), G . Frege, 21:04
- Re: Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Barb Knox, 20:52
- Re: Arithmetization problem, n3wb1e, 20:47
- Re: Simulating multiple correlated random variables - Excel/VBA, Jeff Miller, 20:44
- Re: What to study?, nrvous6, 20:42
- probability theory applied to theology, Gerry Myerson, 20:36
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Lee Rudolph, 20:36
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 20:35
- Specific obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Keith A. Lewis, 20:27
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), mathman, 20:16
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 20:16
- Re: Efficient Computation of MOD's or DIVs of specific numbers, Raymond Manzoni, 20:14
- Re: closed form for convolution of a^n with Fibonacci numbers, Gerry Myerson, 20:14
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 20:12
- Re: Dirichlet series, Timothy Murphy, 20:04
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 20:03
- Re: stumped on integral, Rob Johnson, 19:48
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Stephen J. Herschkorn, 19:46
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Virgil, 19:30
- Efficient Computation of MOD's or DIVs of specific numbers, Collins Williams, 19:28
- Re: Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:26
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, quasi, 19:12
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, bryant_j_j, 19:09
- Obections to Cantor's Theory (Wikipedia article), david petry, 19:02
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, Timothy Little, 18:36
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 18:25
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, Dave L. Renfro, 18:18
- Re: The factoring problem, ToddSmith, 18:15
- Re: Continuous bijections, quasi, 18:12
- Re: Idea behind Schemes (Algeb. Geom.), MathDude, 17:56
- Re: Dirichlet series, Lacustral, 17:42
- Book recommendation for Polya Theory?, Snis Pilbor, 17:41
- Re: symbolic solution of complex roots, Keith A. Lewis, 17:41
- Re: Estimation of extinction for thinned Poisson process, C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 17:39
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:18
- Re: stumped on integral, The World Wide Wade, 17:14
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, fernando revilla, 17:12
- Re: Continuous bijections, The World Wide Wade, 17:12
- compact operators, convergence pointwise / w.r.t. operator norm, Markus Sigg, 17:11
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, T Wake, 17:03
- Re: probability, Proginoskes, 17:01
- Re: Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function, MajorSetback, 16:57
- Re: Can you verify that?, Jeremy Boden, 16:54
- Re: Estimation of extinction for thinned Poisson process, Karl, 16:51
- Re: What to study?, maky m., 16:47
- Re: What to study?, maky m., 16:45
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 16:44
- Re: What calculus text should I cite for l'Hopital's Rule?, Jeremy Boden, 16:42
- Re: stumped on integral, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:35
- Re: stumped on integral, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:35
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 16:34
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 16:34
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 16:31
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, quasi, 16:26
- Re: stumped on integral, carlos, 16:25
- Re: stumped on integral, carlos, 16:06
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, T Wake, 16:05
- Re: Sudoku verifying question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 16:04
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, quasi, 15:57
- symbolic solution of complex roots, Ben, 15:47
- Re: Sudoku verifying question, thomas, 15:46
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, sea-shadow, 15:39
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 15:37
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 15:35
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, Earle Jones, 15:29
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Jiri Lebl, 15:28
- Re: Continuous bijections, Keith A. Lewis, 15:22
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, Rouben Rostamian, 15:21
- Re: Simulating multiple correlated random variables - Excel/VBA, Art Kendall, 15:14
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 15:12
- Re: Sudoku verifying question, Daniel W. Johnson, 15:02
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 15:02
- Re: (N-m choose m)/(N choose m), Keith A. Lewis, 14:51
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 14:48
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 14:34
- When product sigma(k)/d(k) = integer, Leroy Quet, 14:07
- Re: Find The Limit Involving Derivatives, Leroy Quet, 14:02
- Arithmetization problem, n3wb1e, 13:59
- Wanless' ?Fifth? Conjecture, James Wanless, 13:41
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:40
- Re: Implicit complex equation, Ioannis, 13:39
- Re: Trisecting an arbitrary angle, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 13:37
- Re: velocity? (analysis question), Dirk Van de moortel, 13:24
- velocity? (analysis question), Justin Young, 13:14
- Continuous bijections, Michael Stemper, 13:09
- Foldable numbers, bischar, 13:07
- Re: Length along a parabola from vertex, Mark lman, 13:04
- Re: Length along a parabola from vertex, Mark lman, 12:50
- Re: Sudoku verifying question, M.J.T. Guy, 12:36
- Re: degrees of freedom, alainverghote, 12:29
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, Mark Martin, 12:24
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 12:15
- question about incidence axioms, Dani, 11:56
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, Gio Medici, 11:55
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Marc Olschok, 11:44
- Make easy money with Paypal! Do the math!, rich, 11:44
- Re: closed form for convolution of a^n with Fibonacci numbers, David C . Ullrich, 11:41
- Re: closed form for convolution of a^n with Fibonacci numbers, hawkmoon269, 11:37
- Re: Simulating multiple correlated random variables - Excel/VBA, scattered, 11:35
- Re: Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function, jan hauben, 11:22
- Re: Simulating multiple correlated random variables - Excel/VBA, Art Kendall, 11:18
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, crankbuster, 11:03
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, Jeremy Boden, 10:53
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 10:50
- Re: Help on inequality, OnlyRH, 10:48
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 10:45
- Topological sums and attaching, James, 10:42
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:40
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 10:40
- Re: predicting cycle sizes of 2r+1 mod p on (0..p-1), Alex, 10:38
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Han de Bruijn, 10:37
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 10:35
- Re: predicting cycle sizes of 2r+1 mod p on (0..p-1), Alex, 10:34
- Re: closed form for convolution of a^n with Fibonacci numbers, hawkmoon269, 10:26
- Trisecting an arbitrary angle, bassam king karzeddin, 10:25
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 10:16
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Randy Poe, 10:13
- Re: Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function, MajorSetback, 10:11
- Implicit complex equation, Ioannis, 09:54
- Re: Why is the universe expansion accelerating?, Pedro Miguel Carvalho, 09:52
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:40
- Re: Prime Matrices, Dik T. Winter, 09:19
- Re: Subbases of a Topology, Marc Olschok, 08:51
- " Solving : f( d/dx (f(x)) - x) = 1/(2*x^2) - ln(x) ", alainverghote, 08:49
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, T Wake, 08:39
- Re: Idea behind Schemes (Algeb. Geom.), Lee Rudolph, 08:38
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Lee Rudolph, 08:24
- Simulating multiple correlated random variables - Excel/VBA, kipper_fillet, 08:23
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Martin Shobe, 08:19
- Re: Convexity theorem, David C . Ullrich, 08:08
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han de Bruijn, 08:01
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Robert Kolker, 07:57
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, Valeriu Anisiu, 07:27
- Re: Where's Robin Chapman hese days?, Jeremy Boden, 07:21
- Fractal dimension of Alpha-helix, Armond, 07:18
- Re: Convexity theorem, OnlyRH, 07:05
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, Timothy Murphy, 06:42
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, examachine, 06:40
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, David Kastrup, 06:32
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 06:31
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han de Bruijn, 06:19
- Re: Real life statistics problem, William Elliot, 06:00
- Prime Matrices, William Elliot, 05:46
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, David Kastrup, 05:32
- Re: What to study?, quasi, 05:17
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han de Bruijn, 05:03
- Re: Estimation of extinction for thinned Poisson process, Rusty, 04:59
- Re: Prime Matrices, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 04:54
- Re: A question about a finitely generated multiplicative group., , 04:52
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, Jeremy Boden, 04:46
- Re: Estimation of extinction for thinned Poisson process, Zigoteau, 04:42
- Real life statistics problem, Rod, 04:39
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 04:37
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 18, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 04:33
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, David Kastrup, 04:13
- Estimation of extinction for thinned Poisson process, Karl, 04:11
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han de Bruijn, 04:06
- Re: Subbases of a Topology, Jose Capco, 03:51
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, Timothy Little, 03:45
- simplicity of the alternating groups, Ted Hwa, 03:43
- Re: Prime Matrices, William Elliot, 03:38
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, jmfbahciv, 03:34
- Re: Prime Matrices, William Elliot, 03:32
- The whole positive domain of an M-matrix with positive range, Yazdan Bavafa-Toosi, 03:21
- Re: unbiased numbers (Re: Playing dice with pi), quasi, 03:20
- Re: A question about a finitely generated multiplicative group., quasi, 03:03
- Subbases of a Topology, Jose Capco, 02:48
- Re: analysis problem, alexandru . lupas, 02:45
- unbiased numbers (Re: Playing dice with pi), quasi, 02:29
- Re: i am david, Michael Jørgensen, 02:26
- Re: Factorials and exponents, steven, 02:21
- Re: Prime Matrices, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 01:48
- Re: Queued systems with *balking*, Thomas Jones, 00:49
- Re: closed form for convolution of a^n with Fibonacci numbers, Gerry Myerson, 00:47
- Re: probability, Gerry Myerson, 00:43
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 00:40
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 00:39
- Re: (N-m choose m)/(N choose m), ogl100, 00:36
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 00:34
- CSET Algebra Study Partners, Roger Conard, 00:27
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Y.Porat, 00:20
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Y.Porat, 00:18
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
- Re: Square roots, The Ghost In The Machine, 00:00
July 17, 2005
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Joseph Hertzlinger, 23:58
- Re: Convexity theorem, Proginoskes, 23:49
- Re: Queued systems with *balking*, danheyman@xxxxxxxxx, 23:48
- Re: stumped on integral, Proginoskes, 23:46
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 23:44
- Re: unbiased numbers (Re: Playing dice with pi), Stephen J. Herschkorn, 23:44
- cash inmediatly/ cancela tus deudas, maggie, 23:41
- Queued systems with *balking*, Thomas Jones, 22:40
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 22:40
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 22:33
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 22:27
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 22:13
- Re: Factorials and exponents, Proginoskes, 22:04
- Re: What to study?, Woodsman, 22:02
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 22:00
- Re: Dirichlet series, Timothy Murphy, 21:56
- Re: "Cranky" posts in sci.math, Ioannis, 21:27
- Re: Prime lists and Computation, Dik T. Winter, 21:19
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 21:14
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 20:57
- Re: Convexity theorem, OnlyRH, 20:54
- Re: stumped on integral, The World Wide Wade, 20:53
- A question about a finitely generated multiplicative group., crooner, 20:51
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Dik T. Winter, 20:48
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 20:42
- Science Forum, mikelbarce, 20:41
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 20:31
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 20:24
- Re: "Cranky" posts in sci.math, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:05
- Re: What to study?, quasi, 20:05
- Re: Convexity theorem, OnlyRH, 20:03
- Re: Dirichlet series, J Polák, 19:59
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 19:49
- Re: Dirichlet series, Lacustral, 19:06
- Re: "Cranky" posts in sci.math, fishfry, 18:59
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 18:47
- "Cranky" posts in sci.math, Ioannis, 18:34
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 18:33
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 18:25
- Re: Prime Matrices, Leonhard Vogt, 18:22
- Re: (N-m choose m)/(N choose m), Robert Israel, 18:21
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 18:19
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 18:17
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 18:12
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 18:04
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 18:03
- Re: Where's Robin Chapman hese days?, Jim Spriggs, 18:01
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 17:56
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Steven H. Cullinane, 17:54
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 17:54
- Re: closed form for convolution of a^n with Fibonacci numbers, hawkmoon269, 17:53
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 17:50
- Re: to George Ghiata and other FLT fans, Roman B. Binder, 17:48
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, Jim Spriggs, 17:41
- Re: Dirichlet series, bischar, 17:29
- Re: (N-m choose m)/(N choose m), Randy Poe, 17:26
- Where's Robin Chapman hese days?, john_ramsden, 17:25
- Re: polynomial for 2^(1/3)-i, William Elliot, 17:12
- Re: Dirichlet series, Lacustral, 17:11
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 17:11
- Re: Length along a parabola from vertex, Lynn Kurtz, 17:03
- Re: Point on the curve - easier in implicit form?, Tony, 16:56
- (N-m choose m)/(N choose m), ogl100, 16:53
- Re: Can't find my way through this vierification, W. Dale Hall, 16:52
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 16:50
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 16:47
- Re: Dirichlet series, Timothy Murphy, 16:43
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 16:42
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 16:40
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Randy Poe, 16:40
- Re: Point on the curve - easier in implicit form?, john_ramsden, 16:36
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 16:35
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 16:33
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 16:28
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 16:22
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 16:21
- Would Mama let her son marry a Mark-D?, M.D., 16:17
- Re: Point on the curve - easier in implicit form?, Tony, 16:17
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Randy Poe, 16:13
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 16:11
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, sea-shadow, 16:11
- Point on the curve - easier in implicit form?, Tony, 16:07
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 16:02
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:48
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:43
- Re: Number Theory problem: seeking Calculus example, john_ramsden, 15:40
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:40
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:38
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:34
- Re: Can't find my way through this vierification, Ed Hook, 15:27
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:25
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Randy Poe, 15:23
- Re: Can't find my way through this vierification, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 15:22
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:21
- Re: What to study?, Jim Spriggs, 15:21
- Re: Can't find my way through this vierification, Robert Israel, 15:11
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 15:05
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 15:00
- Re: Prime Matrices, William Elliot, 14:55
- Re: Length along a parabola from vertex, Morris Dovey, 14:43
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 14:42
- Re: People are stupid, Konrad Viltersten, 14:30
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 14:26
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Richard Henry, 14:26
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:23
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:22
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:21
- Re: Number Theory problem: seeking Calculus example, Bill Dubuque, 14:20
- Re: Square roots, Dirk Van de moortel, 14:20
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:15
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, David Kastrup, 14:14
- Re: Length along a parabola from vertex, Jim Spriggs, 14:14
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, David Kastrup, 14:13
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:12
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, David Kastrup, 14:11
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 14:09
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:06
- Can't find my way through this vierification, vajra78, 14:05
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:05
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:03
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:02
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:01
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: Square roots, The Ghost In The Machine, 14:00
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 13:57
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 13:56
- Re: Why is the universe expansion accelerating?, luiroto, 13:50
- Re: Convexity theorem, José Carlos Santos, 13:49
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Simon Dean, 13:38
- Re: Convexity theorem, David C . Ullrich, 13:33
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Jim Spriggs, 13:23
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, quasi, 13:12
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Morituri-|-Max, 12:56
- Convexity theorem, OnlyRH, 12:55
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, T Wake, 12:52
- Length along a parabola from vertex, Morris Dovey, 12:51
- Re: Sudoku verifying question, Heiner Marxen, 12:50
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, odin, 12:46
- Re: Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, Mark Martin, 12:42
- Would you let your daughter marry a mathematician?, double d, 12:26
- Re: Square roots, bischar, 12:25
- Re: Factorials and exponents, bischar, 12:20
- Re: polynomial for 2^(1/3)-i, Raymond Manzoni, 12:10
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 12:02
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 12:01
- Re: stumped on integral, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 11:52
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 11:39
- Re: conformal mapping questions, David C . Ullrich, 11:38
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 11:37
- Re: stumped on integral, Kevin Long, 11:29
- polynomial for 2^(1/3)-i, SJ Roh, 10:48
- Re: Why is the universe expansion accelerating?, john_ramsden, 10:48
- Re: conformal mapping questions, Li Yi, 09:53
- Re: conformal mapping questions, David C . Ullrich, 09:52
- Re: conformal mapping questions, Li Yi, 09:51
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, David C . Ullrich, 09:47
- Re: closed form for convolution of a^n with Fibonacci numbers, David C . Ullrich, 09:44
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 09:42
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 09:42
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 09:37
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 09:37
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 09:36
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 09:33
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 09:32
- Re: Why is the universe expansion accelerating?, mathedman, 09:32
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 09:29
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, Rouben Rostamian, 09:28
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 09:27
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 09:27
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 09:23
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 09:22
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 09:21
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 09:19
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 09:16
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 09:15
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 09:10
- Re: Inconsistent sets, David Kastrup, 08:46
- Re: Measure theory help (extended real line), Per Vognsen, 08:19
- Re: Measure theory help (extended real line), Per Vognsen, 08:14
- Re: Prime Matrices, Leonhard Vogt, 07:59
- Re: The Mobius function, Victor S. Miller, 07:45
- Why is the universe expansion accelerating?, Ian Hutcheson, 07:38
- Re: Sudoku verifying question, Ulysse Keller, 07:07
- Re: Continuous Spectrum, Ulysse Keller, 07:07
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:07
- Re: Subbases of a Topology, quasi, 06:42
- Measure theory help (extended real line), Carl R., 06:23
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 06:18
- Re: stumped on integral, The World Wide Wade, 06:17
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 06:15
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 06:11
- Re: Euclidean geometry -- isometries or similarities?, stebla, 06:09
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, cryptic_fan, 05:17
- Re: "Analytic expansion", m3gdev, 05:13
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, crankbuster, 05:08
- The Beautiful Eight-Square Identity, titus_piezas, 04:47
- Re: Prime lists and Computation, Phil Carmody, 04:15
- Re: Subbases of a Topology, William Elliot, 04:07
- Re: conformal mapping questions, Li Yi, 04:00
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, Bill Dubuque, 03:57
- Re: stumped on integral, José Carlos Santos, 03:57
- Re: Distribution of a leveraged portfolio, edemalherbe, 03:51
- conformal mapping questions, Li Yi, 03:04
- Re: Is 'LUSIN THEOREM' true in infinite measure case?, José Carlos Santos, 03:01
- stumped on integral, Kevin Long, 03:01
- Re: Subbases of a Topology, William Elliot, 02:58
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 02:30
- Re: Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, Mark P, 02:21
- Re: Factorials and exponents, steven, 01:44
- Re: Is 'LUSIN THEOREM' true in infinite measure case?, Dave L. Renfro, 01:09
- Re: People are stupid, Proginoskes, 00:42
- Re: People are stupid, Proginoskes, 00:36
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 00:35
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Phil Scott, 00:16
- Re: jointy Gaussian problem, Karl, 00:04
July 16, 2005
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Martin Shobe, 23:58
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Martin Shobe, 23:50
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Martin Shobe, 23:45
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 23:30
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 23:27
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Martin Shobe, 23:21
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Martin Shobe, 23:01
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 23:00
- Re: analysis problem, alexandru . lupas, 22:59
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 22:55
- Re: People are stupid, Matt Timmermans, 22:55
- Re: primality preserving function?, Proginoskes, 22:53
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 22:48
- Re: Prime lists and Computation, Dik T. Winter, 22:47
- Re: People are stupid, Keith Ramsay, 22:34
- Re: Euclidean geometry -- isometries or similarities?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 22:32
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 22:22
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 22:15
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Dik T. Winter, 22:11
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 22:04
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 21:58
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Herman Rubin, 21:56
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, Randy Poe, 21:52
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 21:51
- Physics posers. Re: An new and very interesting intellectual game!, vkarlamov, 21:45
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, Timothy Little, 21:42
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Randy Poe, 21:42
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 21:39
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 21:38
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Randy Poe, 21:37
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 21:34
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 21:30
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car - "NegExp.jpg" 99.1 KBytes , Phil Sherrod, 21:29
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 21:27
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 21:25
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 21:23
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 21:23
- Re: closed form for convolution of a^n with Fibonacci numbers, hawkmoon269, 21:17
- Re: Mathematical concepts, RichD, 20:16
- Re: People are stupid, RichD, 19:56
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, Keith Ramsay, 19:54
- Re: Factorials and exponents, bischar, 19:53
- Re: People are stupid, RichD, 19:51
- Re: People are stupid, RichD, 19:50
- Re: Mathematical concepts, RichD, 19:37
- Re: People are stupid, RichD, 19:24
- Re: A condition for interval overlapping is assymetric?, William Elliot, 19:18
- Re: math question, John Doe III, 18:51
- Spectum of PowerLaw Graph, ogl100, 18:47
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 18:36
- Re: math question, Lynn Kurtz, 18:18
- Re: math question, Rouben Rostamian, 18:10
- math question, John Doe III, 18:05
- Re: Bizarritudes, bischar, 18:03
- Re: The Mobius function, brickman, 17:52
- Re: probability, G. A. Edgar, 17:37
- Re: Factorials and exponents, bischar, 17:36
- Re: An interesting elementary analysis problem, mathman, 17:35
- Re: Circles and tangents! Need some help!, Oscar Lanzi III, 17:30
- Re: predicting cycle sizes of 2r+1 mod p on (0..p-1), Phil Carmody, 17:30
- Re: predicting cycle sizes of 2r+1 mod p on (0..p-1), Phil Carmody, 17:28
- Re: Factorials and exponents, mathman, 17:25
- Re: Factorials and exponents, Joseph Fagan, 17:19
- Re: Euclidean geometry -- isometries or similarities?, Mark Atherton, 17:18
- Re: basic question about sum of a MATRIX geometric series, Herman Rubin, 17:18
- Re: Factorials and exponents, Oscar Lanzi III, 17:13
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 17:03
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Phil Carmody, 17:00
- Factorials and exponents, bischar, 16:59
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 16:58
- Re: A giant meteor is about to strike the earth, Phil Carmody, 16:56
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han . deBruijn, 16:55
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 16:54
- Re: Prime lists and Computation, Phil Carmody, 16:51
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han . deBruijn, 16:30
- Re: People are stupid, Phil Carmody, 16:26
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, Dave Seaman, 16:24
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 16:23
- Collatz 3x+1 or (new) 3x + 1/2, Dan, 16:14
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 16:08
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han . deBruijn, 16:08
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, David C . Ullrich, 15:57
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, Virgil, 15:57
- Re: conform mapping, David C . Ullrich, 15:52
- basic question about sum of a MATRIX geometric series, Kenneth T. Onyee, 15:50
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han . deBruijn, 15:48
- Re: Discussion: What are foundations of math?, Robert Kolker, 15:41
- Re: About prime numbers, Phil Carmody, 15:39
- Bizarritudes, bischar, 15:36
- Re: Prime Matrices, sttscitrans, 14:47
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, vconfused, 14:46
- Re: Gravity in relation with pi?, Barry Schwarz, 14:36
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Franziska Neugebauer, 14:12
- Re: Curiosity involving 2^(1/3), sttscitrans, 14:09
- Re: Probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:07
- Re: dimensions ( negative or complex), Lee Rudolph, 14:07
- Re: A condition for interval overlapping is assymetric?, mikharakiri_nospaum, 13:53
- Re: dimensions ( negative or complex), Norm Dresner, 13:51
- Re: Gravity in relation with pi? -, JEMebius, 13:51
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jiri Lebl, 13:31
- Re: The Question is: What is The Question?, bischar, 13:26
- Re: The Question is: What is The Question?, Uncle Al, 13:18
- Re: Is 'LUSIN THEOREM' true in infinite measure case?, José Carlos Santos, 13:15
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jiri Lebl, 13:13
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 13:06
- Re: re: The Theorem is: What is The Theorem?, bischar, 13:03
- Re: Discussion: What are foundations of math?, Jim Spriggs, 12:47
- jointy Gaussian problem, malghara, 12:43
- Re: Discussion: What are foundations of math?, Jeremy Boden, 12:41
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, David Kastrup, 12:38
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, john_ramsden, 12:31
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 12:08
- Is 'LUSIN THEOREM' true in infinite measure case?, Benjamin, 11:59
- Re: analysis problem, Ed Hook, 11:40
- Re: conform mapping, Li Yi, 11:35
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, crankbuster, 11:35
- Re: conform mapping, Li Yi, 11:28
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:28
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:27
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:25
- An interesting elementary analysis problem, sea-shadow, 11:24
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:20
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:18
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 11:16
- Re: Probability problem, agapito6314, 10:51
- Re: What to study?, Adam Born, 10:47
- Re: analysis problem, alexandru . lupas, 10:30
- Re: i am david, Claudio Grondi, 10:29
- Re: nerve of the covering, Per Vognsen, 10:22
- Re: nerve of the covering, Per Vognsen, 10:09
- Re: probability, Karl, 10:06
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, Randy Poe, 09:56
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Randy Poe, 09:47
- Re: Partitions with one crossing, Laszlo Bardos, 08:53
- Re: Prime Matrices, The Qurqirish Dragon, 08:46
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, Dave Seaman, 08:38
- Re: Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function, jan hauben, 08:35
- "Analytic expansion", m3gdev, 08:28
- Re: probability, The Qurqirish Dragon, 08:26
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 08:07
- Re: I am confused by the diagonal argument, David C . Ullrich, 08:05
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 08:00
- Re: conform mapping, David C . Ullrich, 07:57
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:56
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:54
- Re: nerve of the covering, Lee Rudolph, 07:52
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:52
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:50
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:49
- Re: closed form for convolution of a^n with Fibonacci numbers, David C . Ullrich, 07:49
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:48
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, john_ramsden, 07:46
- Re: dimensions ( negative or complex), G. A. Edgar, 07:42
- Re: Circles and tangents! Need some help!, quasi, 07:41
- Re: probability, A N Niel, 07:34
- Re: jacobian required?, A N Niel, 07:33
- Re: analysis problem, A N Niel, 07:31
- Re: Euclidean geometry -- isometries or similarities?, G. A. Edgar, 07:29
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:27
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 07:25
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 07:23
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 07:21
- i am david, david, 07:16
- Re: The Mobius function, A N Niel, 07:15
- Re: Prime Matrices, William Elliot, 07:11
- Re: Circles and tangents! Need some help!, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro, 07:10
- Re: primality preserving function?, quasi, 07:00
- Re: Probabilities and complex numbers., quasi, 06:49
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:29
- Re: Prime Matrices, gsax, 06:12
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 06:01
- Re: Prime Matrices, William Elliot, 05:54
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, crankbuster, 05:34
- Prime Matrices, gsax, 05:26
- Euclidean geometry -- isometries or similarities?, jg . campbell . ng, 05:14
- Re: analysis problem, alexandru . lupas, 04:46
- I am confused by the diagonal argument, vconfused, 04:30
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, lcs_nsp, 04:21
- Re: What to study?, Chan-Ho Suh, 04:15
- Re: nerve of the covering, Chan-Ho Suh, 04:04
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, Steve, 04:04
- Re: nerve of the covering, sim_stef, 03:04
- Re: dimensions ( negative or complex), William Elliot, 03:01
- Re: analysis problem, William Elliot, 02:59
- Re: primality preserving function?, William Elliot, 02:55
- Re: primality preserving function?, David Kastrup, 02:47
- Re: primality preserving function?, Raymond Manzoni, 02:44
- Re: primality preserving function?, gsax, 02:41
- jacobian required?, Rudy, 02:30
- Re: primality preserving function?, Raymond Manzoni, 02:27
- Re: nerve of the covering, David Kastrup, 02:23
- Re: analysis problem, epurdy, 02:00
- Re: probability, Karl, 01:54
- primality preserving function?, gsax, 01:43
- dimensions ( negative or complex), gsax, 01:29
- probability, Mary Krimmel, 01:22
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Randy Poe, 01:02
- Re: mathematica command, Dave Seaman, 00:28
- Re: analysis problem, alexandru . lupas, 00:01
July 15, 2005
- Re: Probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 23:55
- Re: A condition for interval overlapping is assymetric?, William Elliot, 23:22
- Re: analysis problem, Justin Young, 23:18
- Re: analysis problem, Brian VanPelt, 23:16
- Re: The Question is: What is The Question?, bischar, 23:14
- interesting sequences (prime related), mainargv, 23:12
- A condition for interval overlapping is assymetric?, mikharakiri_nospaum, 23:04
- Re: The Question is: What is The Question?, Kym Festus, 22:51
- Re: degrees of freedom, david bandel, 22:41
- Re: nerve of the covering, david bandel, 22:33
- Re: Curiosity involving 2^(1/3), rich burge, 22:26
- Re: The Question is: What is The Question?, xxein, 21:58
- Re: Gravity in relation with pi?, Jim Spriggs, 21:42
- analysis problem, Justin Young, 21:32
- Gravity in relation with pi?, novelo, 21:18
- Re: The Answer is: What is The Answer?, bischar, 21:10
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Jim Heckman, 20:45
- mathematica command, Scoobidoo, 19:52
- The Question is: What is The Question?, Jack Sarfatti, 19:52
- Re: Proof of Inverse Function Theorem, Chris, 19:45
- Re: Period of a sine function, William Elliot, 19:40
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, William Elliot, 19:32
- Re: What to study?, Jim Spriggs, 18:35
- Re: What to study?, Woodsman, 18:16
- Re: Number Theory problem: seeking Calculus example, Peter L. Montgomery, 18:14
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, Steve, 17:50
- Re: How to show it the congruence is solvable (or not)?, achava, 17:46
- Money, comun123, 17:22
- Re: Period of a sine function, singau, 17:19
- Re: General topology question, Stuart M Newberger, 17:02
- Re: Period of a sine function, David Moran, 16:57
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Herman Rubin, 16:42
- Re: Adding White Noise (Gaussian Noise) To A Set Of 3d Points, quasi, 16:35
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, mikharakiri_nospaum, 16:35
- Re: Period of a sine function, mathman, 16:35
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Herman Rubin, 16:32
- Re: Proof of Inverse Function Theorem, Per Vognsen, 16:23
- interpolate polynom, Alex Kronberg, 15:52
- Proof of Inverse Function Theorem, Chris, 15:48
- Period of a sine function, Tres . DesPeaux, 15:47
- Re: Partitions with one crossing, Laszlo Bardos, 15:44
- Re: Distance between a line and a point, JEMebius, 15:30
- Re: Partitions with one crossing, Robert Israel, 15:25
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:23
- Re: Series question, aeo6, 15:20
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:18
- Re: Distance between a line and a point, Jonathan Bartlett, 14:59
- Re: Probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:52
- Re: Distance between a line and a point, Keith A. Lewis, 14:34
- Re: What to study?, quasi, 14:29
- Re: PDE solving, edemalherbe, 14:28
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, mikharakiri_nospaum, 14:15
- Re: quiz question, Jeremy Boden, 14:13
- Re: algorithm ?, M.J.T. Guy, 14:09
- Number Theory problem: seeking Calculus example, Dave Rusin, 14:06
- closed form for convolution of a^n with Fibonacci numbers, hawkmoon269, 14:02
- Re: Distance between a line and a point, Jonathan Bartlett, 13:56
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, Daniel McLaury, 13:23
- Distance between a line and a point, Jonathan Bartlett, 13:06
- How to show it the congruence is solvable (or not)?, Konrad Viltersten, 12:28
- Re: How to show it the congruence is solvable (or not)?, Dave Rusin, 12:22
- The Mobius function, brickman, 12:13
- Re: Probabilities and complex numbers., quasi, 12:06
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 11:46
- Re: Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function, MajorSetback, 11:22
- Re: General topology question, Julien Santini, 11:07
- Re: d-Uple embedding, singau, 11:07
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Jiri Lebl, 10:55
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, crankbuster, 10:25
- Re: quiz question, Dik T. Winter, 10:04
- Re: quiz question, Peter Webb, 10:00
- Re: quiz question, alfi286, 09:42
- Re: quiz question, alfi286, 09:40
- Re: quiz question, A N Niel, 09:16
- Re: A New Eigen-decomposition Problem, Jannick Asmus, 08:58
- Re: quiz question, john_ramsden, 08:47
- quiz question, alfi286, 08:11
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 07:57
- Re: General topology question, William Elliot, 07:56
- EC-funded Research Visits: Application Deadline 31/08/2005, europa, 07:05
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Ioannis, 06:49
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Lee Rudolph, 06:38
- Re: Partitions with one crossing, Laszlo Bardos, 06:36
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Jesse F. Hughes, 06:09
- Re: Undergrad --- terminology for a Group property, Anonymous, 05:55
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 05:45
- Ctrl + Alt + Del, OnlyRH, 05:45
- Re: Undergrad --- terminology for a Group property, Anonymous, 05:40
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han de Bruijn, 05:07
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, William Elliot, 04:40
- Re: Matrix convergence problem, Kira Yamato, 03:50
- A New Eigen-decomposition Problem, CWJ Lam, 03:37
- Re: integral help (complex analysis exercise), José Carlos Santos, 03:25
- Re: A class of linear ODEs, Robert Israel, 03:24
- Re: Puzzle related to FLT, Robert Israel, 03:14
- Washington Post, Math modeling more comprehensive sim! Re: Can terror bombing be better prevented by the strategic way?, gangxu_csu, 03:01
- Re: Latin squares, steven, 02:35
- Re: Puzzle related to FLT, Robert Israel, 02:19
- Re: Partitions with one crossing, Robert Israel, 02:01
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, James Dolan, 01:45
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, Steve, 01:11
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, Steve, 00:57
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Mike Kent, 00:47
- Re: Undergrad --- terminology for a Group property, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 00:25
- Re: People are stupid, Day Brown, 00:04
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Richard Henry, 00:04
July 14, 2005
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Joseph Hertzlinger, 23:42
- Monotonicity and Concavity, Ama, 23:35
- Re: What to study?, Karl M. Bunday, 23:26
- Re: Undergrad --- terminology for a Group property, Timothy Murphy, 23:17
- Re: Undergrad --- terminology for a Group property, Ron Sperber, 23:16
- Re: Curiosity involving 2^(1/3), sttscitrans, 23:16
- Re: Partitions with one crossing, Laszlo Bardos, 23:14
- Re: General topology question, William Elliot, 22:55
- Re: New Google Math Group!!!!!!, William Elliot, 22:17
- Undergrad --- terminology for a Group property, Anonymous, 21:59
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Martin Shobe, 21:49
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, mikharakiri_nospaum, 21:06
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, Gerry Myerson, 21:05
- Re: Latin squares, Gerry Myerson, 20:55
- Re: A class of linear ODEs, Gerry Myerson, 20:48
- Re: Partitions with one crossing, Gerry Myerson, 20:38
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 20:33
- Re: Linaer equation problem, Daniel McLaury, 20:16
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, Wayne Brown, 20:13
- Re: Is division smooth over jet bundles?, Pereger, 20:05
- Linaer equation problem, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen, 19:47
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, sea-shadow, 19:46
- Re: proving f(u) >0 for some u, Timothy Little, 19:23
- Re: perfect numbers, Bart Goddard, 19:20
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Martin Shobe, 19:20
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, Vadim Tropashko, 19:13
- Re: Probability problem, Proginoskes, 19:13
- Re: When can we divide? (multivariate calculus), Pereger, 19:05
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, mikharakiri_nospaum, 19:01
- perfect numbers, Brendan O'Sullivan, 18:58
- Is division smooth over jet bundles?, Pereger, 18:57
- Re: Quaternion/Floretion Algebra Multiplication Program, Dement, 18:44
- Puzzle related to FLT, Jeffrey H, 18:35
- Partitions with one crossing, Laszlo Bardos, 18:28
- Re: Calculus Problem, Robert Israel, 18:08
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 17:57
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, Steve, 17:31
- Is there a name for this?, QQ, 17:31
- General topology question, Julien Santini, 17:30
- Re: Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function, jan hauben, 17:30
- Re: proving f(u) >0 for some u, Pereger, 17:21
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Herman Rubin, 17:04
- Re: Quieres ganar Dinero (fasil, rapido y legal). Te apetece.?, guenther vonKnakspot, 17:04
- Re: Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function, MajorSetback, 17:02
- Re: Calculus Problem, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:57
- Re: Calculus Problem, The World Wide Wade, 16:27
- n-variable integrations on a convex polytope region, helen, 16:18
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, steve, 16:11
- Re: math_loser in troubble, please help with summation, mira, 16:03
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, Wayne Brown, 15:56
- Re: Continuous function, fernando revilla, 15:44
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, Jim Spriggs, 15:42
- Re: proving f(u) >0 for some u, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 15:09
- proving f(u) >0 for some u, Amanda, 15:02
- Re: How to show x=ln(x) has no solution ?, Ioannis, 14:52
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, williammaw, 14:47
- Re: What to study?, Dave Rusin, 14:44
- Re: How to show x=ln(x) has no solution ?, Ronald Bruck, 14:38
- Re: Continuous function, Ronald Bruck, 14:34
- Calculus Problem, Bart Goddard, 14:22
- Re: math_loser in troubble, please help with summation, A N Niel, 14:19
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, briggs, 14:18
- Re: math_loser in troubble, please help with summation, Raymond Manzoni, 14:13
- Re: Smallest rectangle that this shape can fit into, Lynn Kurtz, 14:12
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, williammaw, 14:11
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:02
- Re: Universal Definition of Subset, Daniel McLaury, 13:57
- Re: math_loser in troubble, please help with summation, mira, 13:54
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 13:47
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Rob Johnson, 13:47
- Universal Definition of Subset, williammaw, 13:45
- Re: HERE: A GENIUS AMATEUR's SCIENCE ARTICLES POSTING(updated), george ghiata, 13:43
- Re: Probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:25
- Re: Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function, jan hauben, 13:13
- Re: math_loser in troubble, please help with summation, john_ramsden, 13:10
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, john_ramsden, 13:03
- Re: People are stupid, mikharakiri_nospaum, 12:58
- Re: Optimize in the Complex Domain -- possible?, Tim, 12:56
- Re: Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function, MajorSetback, 12:41
- Stockmarket geometry anyone?, Fopa, 12:28
- Re: Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function, jan hauben, 12:25
- Re: Probability problem, agapito6314, 12:10
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, crankbuster, 11:56
- Re: Smallest rectangle that this shape can fit into, Keith A. Lewis, 11:32
- Re: Transversals, Lee Rudolph, 11:31
- Looking for Linear Stretch Constant for 1D Function, MajorSetback, 11:26
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture - Yet Another Proof, Kamalu, 11:26
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, aeo6, 11:18
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jiri Lebl, 11:09
- Re: When can we divide? (multivariate calculus), Dave Rusin, 10:54
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Jiri Lebl, 10:52
- A class of linear ODEs, john_ramsden, 10:51
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 10:49
- What to study?, nrvous6, 10:47
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture - Yet Another Proof, Kamalu, 10:46
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han de Bruijn, 10:35
- Re: Relative Cardinality, fiesh, 10:35
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 10:33
- Re: math_loser in troubble, please help with summation, A N Niel, 10:16
- Re: series convergence problem, David C . Ullrich, 10:12
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 10:11
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, David C . Ullrich, 10:02
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Randy Poe, 09:50
- math_loser in troubble, please help with summation, mira, 09:49
- Re: Optimize in the Complex Domain -- possible?, Randy Poe, 09:39
- Re: Optimize in the Complex Domain -- possible?, bryant_j_j, 09:35
- Optimize in the Complex Domain -- possible?, Tim, 09:27
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:19
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, Jesse F. Hughes, 09:17
- Re: New Google Math Group!!!!!!, Keith A. Lewis, 09:14
- Re: Matrix convergence problem, David C . Ullrich, 08:53
- Re: Theory of FOrmulas simplified - How fascinating!, William Elliot, 08:45
- Re: series convergence problem, Anon, 08:45
- Re: predicting cycle sizes of 2r+1 mod p on (0..p-1), Alex, 08:43
- Re: A Correction in Set Theory, David C . Ullrich, 08:36
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Timothy Murphy, 08:32
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, Timothy Murphy, 08:15
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Martin Shobe, 08:07
- Re: Latin squares, steven, 08:06
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, john_ramsden, 08:05
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, double d, 07:49
- Latin squares, steven, 07:45
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, James Dolan, 06:53
- Re: When can we divide? (multivariate calculus), Lee Rudolph, 06:45
- Re: New Math Group: SingleVariableCalculus!!!, Patrick, 06:41
- Re: When can we divide? (multivariate calculus), Pereger, 06:37
- Re: When can we divide? (multivariate calculus), Lee Rudolph, 06:36
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han de Bruijn, 06:36
- Theory of FOrmulas simplified - How fascinating!, Victor Porton, 06:28
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language - ill-conditioned problems, JEMebius, 06:02
- Re: series convergence problem, gsax, 06:00
- Re: consistent formalisms question, Herman Jurjus, 05:57
- Smallest rectangle that this shape can fit into, graemeharison, 05:55
- Re: Multivariate permutations?, NickC, 05:45
- Re: When can we divide? (multivariate calculus), Pereger, 05:23
- Re: series convergence problem, gsax, 05:13
- Re: series convergence problem, gsax, 05:11
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, Han de Bruijn, 05:04
- Re: series convergence problem, José Carlos Santos, 05:02
- Re: Geometric puzzle "eyeball theorem", Tapio, 04:57
- Re: degrees of freedom, Michael Jørgensen, 04:55
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han de Bruijn, 04:47
- Re: Geometric puzzle "eyeball theorem", Michael Jørgensen, 04:45
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Han de Bruijn, 04:32
- Re: series convergence problem, Justin Young, 04:23
- Re: Simple problem, Jeremy Boden, 04:21
- Re: Linear Programming Help!, Dana, 04:12
- Matrix convergence problem, Kira Yamato, 04:05
- Determining Primes (Or the Powers of Primes), rer, 03:53
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Han de Bruijn, 03:50
- Re: New Google Math Group!!!!!!, William Elliot, 03:33
- Re: series convergence problem, Justin Young, 03:30
- Re: series convergence problem, gsax, 03:29
- Re: x^3+y^3=z^3, William Elliot, 03:27
- Penrose's impossible object in 4D, gsax, 03:25
- Re: series convergence problem, The World Wide Wade, 03:23
- x^3+y^3=z^3, steve, 03:04
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 02:36
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Timothy Little, 02:31
- Re: series convergence problem, Karl, 02:30
- Re: mathematica question; anybody knows how to obtain a direct product of two sets in mathematica?, Dana, 02:29
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, G . Frege, 02:25
- Re: series convergence problem, Jannick Asmus, 02:23
- Re: series convergence problem, gsax, 02:21
- Re: scale transformation, Ray Koopman, 02:04
- series convergence problem, Justin Young, 01:39
- Re: When can we divide? (multivariate calculus), Dave Rusin, 01:01
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, double d, 00:10
- New Math Group: SingleVariableCalculus!!!, mcyberliver, 00:08
July 13, 2005
- Re: When can we divide? (multivariate calculus), barr, 23:52
- Re: New Google Math Group!!!!!!, Proginoskes, 23:10
- Re: Linear dependence criteria for the solvability of linear, inhomogeneous systems, Wolff, 23:07
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 23:07
- Re: Sudoku verifying question, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:43
- Re: Probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 22:27
- Re: Transversals, Gerry Myerson, 22:16
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 22:11
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 22:10
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 22:08
- Re: Can you verify that?, vajra78, 22:05
- Re: New Google Math Group!!!!!!, William Elliot, 22:04
- Re: New Google Math Group!!!!!!, mcyberliver, 21:36
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 21:35
- A Correction in Set Theory, Dave L. Renfro, 21:14
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 21:05
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Dik T. Winter, 20:55
- Re: Can you verify that?, The World Wide Wade, 20:52
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Dik T. Winter, 20:44
- Re: mathematica question; anybody knows how to obtain a direct product of two sets in mathematica?, Robert Israel, 20:35
- Re: PDE solving, Robert Israel, 20:25
- Re: Can you verify that?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 20:24
- Re: Can you verify that?, vajra78, 20:17
- Re: Can you verify that?, vajra78, 20:17
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 20:12
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 20:06
- Re: Series question, Proginoskes, 20:01
- Re: convex polyhedra, Chris, 19:59
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 19:58
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 19:54
- Re: Linear Programming Help!, Chris, 19:51
- Re: Probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 19:49
- Re: degrees of freedom, Proginoskes, 19:48
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 19:44
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 19:40
- Re: Linear Programming Help!, Proginoskes, 19:37
- Re: Imaging Quaternion and R^4 spaces, Leonhard Vogt, 19:35
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 19:34
- Re: New Google Math Group!!!!!!, William Elliot, 19:33
- convex polyhedra, Amar, 19:29
- Re: Connecting graph vertices with edges that never intersect, Proginoskes, 19:29
- mathematica question; anybody knows how to obtain a direct product of two sets in mathematica?, Scoobidoo, 19:26
- Re: Connecting graph vertices with edges that never intersect, Proginoskes, 19:26
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 19:25
- Re: People are stupid, Proginoskes, 19:23
- Re: Can you verify that?, Scoobidoo, 19:22
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 19:18
- Re: Can you verify that?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 19:18
- Re: Probability problem, Proginoskes, 19:18
- Re: PDE solving, edemalherbe, 19:14
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 19:11
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 19:11
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 19:07
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 19:06
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 19:05
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 19:01
- Can you verify that?, vajra78, 18:59
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 18:57
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 18:53
- Re: Distribution of a leveraged portfolio, edemalherbe, 18:47
- Can you verify that?, vajra78, 18:46
- Re: Sudoku verifying question, thomas, 18:41
- Re: Multivariate permutations?, Ray Koopman, 18:35
- Sudoku verifying question, thomas, 18:33
- Re: degrees of freedom, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 18:32
- Re: Multivariate permutations?, Jim Ferry, 18:23
- Re: Prime number lists, Jeremy Boden, 18:04
- Re: MONOTONE SET FUNCTIONS, FIXED POINTS, AND CECH CLOSURE FUNCTIONS, Dave L. Renfro, 18:04
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, cbrown, 18:01
- Re: PDE solving, Robert Israel, 17:52
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, bobkolker, 17:30
- Re: How to show x=ln(x) has no solution ?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 17:29
- Re: How to show x=ln(x) has no solution ?, achava, 17:12
- Re: Series question, Timothy Murphy, 16:58
- Re: degrees of freedom, George Marsaglia, 16:54
- Re: consistent formalisms question, david petry, 16:42
- Re: Fundamental theorems of caclulus: which is which?, Artur, 16:33
- Re: Inconsistent sets, Virgil, 16:06
- Distribution of a leveraged portfolio, Brablo, 16:04
- Re: People are stupid, Herman Rubin, 15:55
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:54
- Re: Linear Programming Help!, Chris, 15:51
- Geometric puzzle "eyeball theorem", Tapio, 15:51
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:48
- Re: degrees of freedom, Jim Spriggs, 15:43
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:42
- Re: People are stupid, Herman Rubin, 15:37
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:35
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:33
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:31
- degrees of freedom, pirhosigma_01, 15:28
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:27
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Herman Rubin, 15:26
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:21
- Re: People are stupid, David Kastrup, 15:19
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:08
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:59
- Re: Irrelevant Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:53
- Re: Fundamental theorems of caclulus: which is which?, Artur, 14:43
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:43
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:39
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:37
- Re: Linear Programming Help!, Chris, 14:36
- Re: Continuous Spectrum, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 14:32
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:31
- When can we divide? (multivariate calculus), Pereger, 14:31
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:31
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:29
- Re: Multivariate permutations?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:29
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:28
- Re: Find The Limit Involving Derivatives, Leroy Quet, 14:25
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:24
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:22
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:21
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:19
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:19
- PDE solving, edemalherbe, 14:17
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:15
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:12
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:10
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:04
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:02
- Re: How to show x=ln(x) has no solution ?, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 13:56
- Re: Multivariate permutations?, Robert Israel, 13:43
- Re: People are stupid, aeo6, 13:41
- Re: Connecting graph vertices with edges that never intersect, Jim Ferry, 13:39
- non-homogeneous quasi-linear maniframes over toplogical metric spaces with tensor paramters (continuous and independant), david bandel, 13:16
- Imaging Quaternion and R^4 spaces, Ioannis, 13:13
- Re: Series question, aeo6, 13:08
- Re: Physics... math problem, david bandel, 13:05
- TROLL Re: What is the standard mass-density of a cubic decimeter of pure water?, odin, 13:03
- d-Uple embedding, singau, 12:56
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Rob Johnson, 12:55
- Re: Physics... math problem, Keith A. Lewis, 12:48
- Re: Series question, Timothy Murphy, 12:42
- Re: People are stupid, mikharakiri_nospaum, 12:41
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Randy Poe, 12:18
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Jiri Lebl, 12:12
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Aatu Koskensilta, 11:51
- Re: Series question, aeo6, 11:28
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, john_ramsden, 11:16
- Probability problem, agapito6314, 11:15
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 10:57
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, David Kastrup, 10:51
- Re: Advice on topology (undergraduate thesis), David C . Ullrich, 10:45
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 10:45
- Maximize Availability, Tim, 10:42
- Re: JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, Nora Baron, 10:40
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 10:40
- Re: Rendering the fall through event horizon, john_ramsden, 10:37
- integral help (complex analysis exercise), Li Yi, 10:36
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 10:33
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 10:32
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 10:30
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 10:28
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 10:27
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 10:25
- Re: What is the standard mass-density of a cubic decimeter of pure water?, Jeremy Boden, 10:22
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 10:21
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:18
- Re: Inconsistent sets, mueckenh, 10:18
- Multivariate permutations?, NickC, 09:52
- Re: If ( A intersection B) and (A intersection C) are independent then is A and BUC independent? ( A, B and C are samples), Rob Johnson, 09:49
- Re: a question in linear algebra about matrices..., Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:31
- Re: JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, Dik T. Winter, 09:11
- Re: Continuous function -, JEMebius, 08:57
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Dave Seaman, 08:54
- Re: Advice on topology (undergraduate thesis), gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 08:54
- Re: confused by notation in Artin's Algebra, Sirix, 08:36
- Re: JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, examachine, 08:28
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, examachine, 08:26
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 08:25
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, A N Niel, 08:20
- Re: New Google Math Group!!!!!!, examachine, 08:11
- Re: Continuous function, William Elliot, 07:28
- Re: I can't understand this, William Elliot, 07:17
- Re: question in logic, David C . Ullrich, 07:10
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Jeremy Boden, 07:06
- Re: scale transformation, jan hauben, 06:47
- I can't understand this, jonathanthio, 06:46
- Continuous function, jonathanthio, 06:32
- Re: How to show x=ln(x) has no solution ?, Karl, 06:31
- Re: How to show x=ln(x) has no solution ?, David Kastrup, 06:31
- How to show x=ln(x) has no solution ?, Herb, 06:21
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:51
- Re: Physics... math problem -, JEMebius, 05:47
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:47
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:44
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 05:41
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Steven H. Cullinane, 05:41
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 05:37
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:30
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:28
- Re: Physics... math problem, W. Dale Hall, 05:26
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:25
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:23
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:22
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:21
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:17
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:16
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:13
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:12
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 05:11
- Re: series growing in a polynomial fashion, gsax, 05:01
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Han de Bruijn, 04:56
- Re: Connecting graph vertices with edges that never intersect, Han de Bruijn, 04:33
- Re: Connecting graph vertices with edges that never intersect, Han de Bruijn, 04:26
- Re: series growing in a polynomial fashion, Robert Israel, 04:22
- Re: Linear Programming Help!, Robert Israel, 04:15
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Han de Bruijn, 04:13
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han de Bruijn, 04:03
- series growing in a polynomial fashion, gsax, 03:46
- Re: x^3=x implies ring is commutative, Johann Wiesenbauer, 03:33
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, Mitch Harris, 03:28
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, James Dolan, 03:26
- Re: JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, Jesse F. Hughes, 03:04
- Re: New Google Math Group!!!!!!, William Elliot, 02:26
- Re: People are stupid, Proginoskes, 02:22
- Re: People are stupid, Proginoskes, 02:20
- Re: Linear dependence criteria for the solvability of linear, inhomogeneous systems, Proginoskes, 02:07
- Re: confused by notation in Artin's Algebra, Jim Heckman, 01:51
- Re: Diophantine equation, Steve, 01:32
- New Google Math Group!!!!!!, mcyberliver, 01:30
- Re: New Google Math Group!!!, mcyberliver, 01:26
- New Google Math Group!!!, mcyberliver, 01:13
- Advice on topology (undergraduate thesis), Carl R., 01:03
- Re: Physics... math problem, Nathan Gilbert, 00:45
- Re: Smoothness of a quotient (multivariate calculus), Pereger, 00:37
July 12, 2005
- Re: Physics... math problem, Dr.LouisSlotin, 23:46
- Re: confused by notation in Artin's Algebra, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:17
- Re: consistent formalisms question, torkel, 23:12
- Linear dependence criteria for the solvability of linear, inhomogeneous systems, Wolff, 23:09
- Re: Topology help: locally compact refinement, Meg Weiss, 22:31
- Re: Physics... math problem, novelo, 22:20
- Re: Physics... math problem, David Moran, 22:20
- Re: Physics... math problem, David Moran, 22:18
- Re:A different RSA challenge, Dan, 22:16
- Re: Physics... math problem, David Moran, 22:12
- Linear dependence criteria for the solvability of linear, inhomogeneous systems, Wolff, 22:06
- Re: Physics... math problem, Dr.LouisSlotin, 22:00
- Linear Programming Help!, Lost..., 21:54
- Re: algorithm ?, Anon, 21:49
- Physics... math problem, novelo, 21:45
- Re: confused by notation in Artin's Algebra, Keith Ramsay, 21:28
- Re: confused by notation in Artin's Algebra, Ted Hwa, 21:19
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, Herman Rubin, 21:18
- Paypal money making schemes -- legit?, nojunk, 21:05
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Keith Ramsay, 20:59
- Linear Programming Help!, Lost..., 20:53
- Continuous Spectrum, FrankN, 20:50
- Re: If ( A intersection B) and (A intersection C) are independent then is A and BUC independent? ( A, B and C are samples), Robert Israel, 20:49
- Re: linear to 2D mapping, micromysore, 20:32
- Re: If ( A intersection B) and (A intersection C) are independent then is A and BUC independent? ( A, B and C are samples), Butch Malahide, 20:10
- Re: JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, Bruce Stephens, 19:45
- Re: If ( A intersection B) and (A intersection C) are independent then is A and BUC independent? ( A, B and C are samples), Scoobidoo, 19:40
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Dik T. Winter, 19:04
- Re: Anyone know what is happening about NIST's DLMF project?, Dik T. Winter, 18:56
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, maky m., 18:28
- Re: Fundamental theorems of caclulus: which is which?, Proginoskes, 18:25
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, William Elliot, 18:23
- Re: Connecting graph vertices with edges that never intersect, Proginoskes, 18:12
- to George Ghiata and other FLT fans, Roman B. Binder, 17:59
- Re: algorithm ?, stephen, 17:57
- Re: question in logic, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 17:52
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, fernando revilla, 17:45
- Re: x^3=x implies ring is commutative, themadhatter012, 17:42
- Re: Transversals, themadhatter012, 17:41
- Re: Transversals, themadhatter012, 17:39
- Re: consistent formalisms question, Robert Israel, 17:36
- Re: scale transformation, eli . ipod, 17:34
- question in logic, style, 16:59
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, Robert Israel, 16:39
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, Zdislav V. Kovarik, 16:36
- Re: predicting cycle sizes of 2r+1 mod p on (0..p-1), Robert Israel, 16:33
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, Jim Spriggs, 16:24
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, fernando revilla, 16:23
- consistent formalisms question, david petry, 16:18
- Re: JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, Jim Spriggs, 16:18
- Re: linear to 2D mapping, Randy Poe, 16:13
- Re: Fundamental theorems of caclulus: which is which?, The World Wide Wade, 16:08
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:06
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, Peteris Krumins, 16:06
- confused by notation in Artin's Algebra, Justin Young, 16:04
- Re: 3n+1, pdivos, 16:03
- Re: Optimal Backgammon, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:40
- Re: If ( A intersection B) and (A intersection C) are independent then is A and BUC independent? ( A, B and C are samples), Stephen J. Herschkorn, 15:35
- If ( A intersection B) and (A intersection C) are independent then is A and BUC independent? ( A, B and C are samples), Scoobidoo, 15:13
- Re: x^3=x implies ring is commutative, Bill Dubuque, 14:52
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:25
- Re: Fundamental theorems of caclulus: which is which?, odin, 13:57
- Re: Fundamental theorems of caclulus: which is which?, odin, 13:54
- Re: linear to 2D mapping, aeo6, 13:51
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Herman Rubin, 13:45
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 13:45
- Re: Fundamental theorems of caclulus: which is which?, Aage Andersen, 13:44
- Re: People are stupid, nikki, 13:41
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, Lee Rudolph, 13:36
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Dan Piponi, 13:36
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, Jim Spriggs, 13:32
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:26
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, The World Wide Wade, 13:24
- Fundamental theorems of caclulus: which is which?, Vassilis Pandis, 13:21
- Re: The factoring problem, Tom St Denis, 13:17
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Herman Rubin, 13:14
- Re: Optimal Backgammon, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:13
- Re: is D'(\Omega) dense in L^p(\Omega) ?, Pouya D. Tafti, 13:12
- Re: algorithm ?, M.J.T. Guy, 13:10
- Re: algorithm ?, M.J.T. Guy, 13:08
- Re: Smoothness of a quotient (multivariate calculus), The World Wide Wade, 13:02
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Herman Rubin, 12:57
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Steven H. Cullinane, 12:55
- Re: Atiyah&McDonald Question., Sirix, 12:51
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Herman Rubin, 12:33
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, pit?goras, 12:22
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Jeremy Boden, 12:10
- Re: People are stupid, Herman Rubin, 12:00
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 11:46
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Herman Rubin, 11:17
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Jiri Lebl, 11:11
- Re: algorithm ?, vsgdp, 11:07
- Re: a number between 0 and 1 is taken randomly. What is the probability for the first decimal is even?, Puppet_Sock, 11:04
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Pete, 10:55
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Herman Rubin, 10:49
- Re: Pronunciations of math symbols, Dal Mon, 10:49
- Re: x^3=x implies ring is commutative, Johann Wiesenbauer, 10:19
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Jesse F. Hughes, 10:19
- Re: Anyone know what is happening about NIST's DLMF project?, john_ramsden, 10:17
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Dik T. Winter, 10:11
- Anyone know what is happening about NIST's DLMF project?, john_ramsden, 10:09
- Re: Condition number of a matrix, ddwonderboy_ds, 10:01
- Re: x^3=x implies ring is commutative, Tonico, 09:54
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 09:47
- Re: Connecting graph vertices with edges that never intersect, Konstantin Pankrashkin, 09:32
- Re: Pronunciations of math symbols, Konstantin Pankrashkin, 09:28
- Re: Looking for mathematicians, fernando revilla, 09:26
- Re: Maximal Isotropic Subspaces, Konstantin Pankrashkin, 09:22
- Condition number of a matrix, Euh, 09:21
- Re: Connecting graph vertices with edges that never intersect, Tony, 09:12
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, G.E. Ivey, 09:10
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Marc Olschok, 09:07
- Re: Fields of characteristic 2, Dik T. Winter, 08:52
- Re: Z transform problem, David C . Ullrich, 08:44
- Re: Axiom of choice for singletons?, David C . Ullrich, 08:37
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, crankbuster, 08:23
- Re: a number between 0 and 1 is taken randomly. What is the probability for the first decimal is even?, A N Niel, 08:22
- Re: Optimal Backgammon, David C . Ullrich, 08:20
- Re: x^3=x implies ring is commutative, G. A. Edgar, 08:18
- Re: Optimal Backgammon (was: Re: Game Theory), David C . Ullrich, 08:18
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, G. A. Edgar, 08:12
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Bob Stewart, 08:12
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Dik T. Winter, 07:58
- Re: Fields of characteristic 2, JoeS, 07:47
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, john_ramsden, 07:35
- Re: Transversals, Lee Rudolph, 07:31
- Re: Smoothness of a quotient (multivariate calculus), Pereger, 07:28
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Han de Bruijn, 07:04
- Re: Connecting graph vertices with edges that never intersect, Han de Bruijn, 06:48
- Re: is D'(\Omega) dense in L^p(\Omega) ?, Stuart M Newberger, 06:40
- Maximal Isotropic Subspaces, Maury Barbato, 06:38
- Re: sum of polygonal numbers, gsax, 06:25
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Han de Bruijn, 06:16
- Re: sum of polygonal numbers, José Carlos Santos, 06:14
- Looking for mathematicians, Drengor, 06:12
- predicting cycle sizes of 2r+1 mod p on (0..p-1), Alex, 06:07
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, crankbuster, 06:04
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture - Yet Another Proof, Kamalu, 05:57
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Han de Bruijn, 05:56
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture - Yet Another Proof, Kamalu, 05:55
- sum of polygonal numbers, gsax, 05:51
- Re: Q: approximating cdf Normal by cdf Binomial, iandjmsmith, 05:49
- Re: x^3=x implies ring is commutative, Johann Wiesenbauer, 05:26
- Re: Help on inequality, OnlyRH, 05:20
- Re: a number between 0 and 1 is taken randomly. What is the probability for the first decimal is even?, cbrown, 04:58
- Re: LaRouche Youth Movement, dtfoster, 04:55
- Re: Transversals, , 04:30
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, William Elliot, 04:08
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t, 04:07
- Re: Steven Cullinane is a Crank, Steven H. Cullinane, 04:02
- Re: Steven Cullinane's "Diamond Theory", Steven H. Cullinane, 03:58
- Re: Kretschmann's objection to Einstein's GR refuted, ianparker2, 03:33
- Re: Polynomials and field extensions, Elias Vicari, 03:06
- LaRouche Youth Movement, dtfoster, 02:24
- Re: linear to 2D mapping, Timothy Little, 02:23
- Re: Optimal Backgammon, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 02:21
- Re: Transversals, Timothy Little, 02:06
- Re: algorithm ?, MJ, 02:01
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 00:46
July 11, 2005
- Re: Z transform problem, bryant_j_j, 23:45
- Re: Rotations of T,N,B vector triad in a loop, Narasimham, 23:17
- algorithm ?, vsgdp, 23:12
- Re: The factoring problem, Bryan Olson, 23:06
- Re: The factoring problem, Bryan Olson, 23:01
- Z transform problem, simondex, 23:00
- Re: Pronunciations of math symbols, Gerry Myerson, 22:57
- Re: Z transform property, simondex, 22:54
- Re: Z transform property, simondex, 22:54
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Herman Rubin, 22:42
- Re: Connecting graph vertices with edges that never intersect, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:29
- Connecting graph vertices with edges that never intersect, Tony, 22:11
- Re: linear to 2D mapping, micromysore, 22:09
- Re: Three collinear points, Ken Pledger, 22:07
- Re: linear to 2D mapping, Robert Israel, 22:04
- linear to 2D mapping, micromysore, 21:59
- Z transform property, simondex, 21:50
- Pronunciations of math symbols, simondex, 21:48
- Re: People are stupid, Matt Timmermans, 21:38
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 21:30
- Re: Definition of Functions in Calculus, Jim Spriggs, 21:23
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 21:15
- Definition of Functions in Calculus, Pete, 20:57
- Re: Simple problem, Robert Israel, 20:47
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, Rouben Rostamian, 20:19
- Re: Transversals, Lee Rudolph, 19:58
- is D'(\Omega) dense in L^p(\Omega) ?, Pouya D. Tafti, 19:50
- Re: 3n+1, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:48
- is D'(\Omega) dense in L^p(\Omega) ?, Pouya D. Tafti, 19:44
- Re: Axiom of choice for singletons?, Snis Pilbor, 19:43
- Kretschmann's objection to Einstein's GR refuted, Jack Sarfatti, 19:42
- Re: x^3=x implies ring is commutative, Simon Dean, 19:40
- Re: Transversals, Ron Sperber, 19:29
- Re: x^3=x implies ring is commutative, mr_mathematician, 19:23
- Re: a number between 0 and 1 is taken randomly. What is the probability for the first decimal is even?, alanmc95210, 19:21
- Re: a number between 0 and 1 is taken randomly. What is the probability for the first decimal is even?, Mark lman, 19:20
- Re: Simple problem, Timothy Little, 19:19
- Re: weirdest mathematician: Is math a disease?, double d, 19:15
- Re: weirdest mathematician: Is math a disease?, Wayne Brown, 19:14
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Timothy Little, 19:11
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 19:05
- Re: 3n+1, pdivos, 19:01
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 18:58
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 18:51
- Re: 3n+1 Collatz, Keith A. Lewis, 18:45
- Re: 3n+1 Collatz, pdivos, 18:36
- Re: 3n+1 Collatz, pdivos, 18:30
- Re: x^3=x implies ring is commutative, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:20
- Re: 3n+1 Collatz, Keith A. Lewis, 18:14
- Transversals, themadhatter012, 17:54
- Re: Polynomials and field extensions, Timothy Murphy, 17:53
- Re: weirdest mathematician: Is math a disease?, Aldar C-F. Chan, 17:44
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, Lee Rudolph, 17:42
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Tom Huckstep, 17:40
- Re: Views of the mathematical reality in eastern religions/philosophies?, dkotschess@xxxxxxxxx, 17:39
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, David Park, 17:33
- Re: Axiom of choice for singletons?, Tom Huckstep, 17:32
- Re: Infinity is not that big!, Matthew, 17:24
- Re: Simple nonlinear PDE. Please help?, Robert Israel, 17:21
- Re: Simple problem, Zhang-zi, 17:08
- Re: Fields of characteristic 2, José Carlos Santos, 17:08
- x^3=x implies ring is commutative, themadhatter012, 17:01
- ** John Thomas Gunner Levorson - April 9th 1936 **, I'm Such A Big Big Merrie Amsterburg Fan, 16:58
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Dave Seaman, 16:50
- Re: JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:40
- Re: JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, mm, 16:40
- Re: Simple nonlinear PDE. Please help?, Robert Israel, 16:39
- Re: Smoothness of a quotient (multivariate calculus), The World Wide Wade, 16:16
- Re: Mathematical concepts, RichD, 16:12
- Re: JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, David Kastrup, 16:07
- Re: People are stupid, RichD, 16:01
- Re: JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, examachine, 16:01
- Re: a number between 0 and 1 is taken randomly. What is the probability for the first decimal is even?, examachine, 15:59
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, examachine, 15:56
- Re: What calculus text should I cite for l'Hopital's Rule?, Dan Piponi, 15:50
- Re: People are stupid, RichD, 15:48
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, The World Wide Wade, 15:47
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, The World Wide Wade, 15:43
- Re: a number between 0 and 1 is taken randomly. What is the probability for the first decimal is even?, Phil Freedenberg, 15:41
- Re: Mathematical concepts, RichD, 15:39
- Re: Smoothness of a quotient (multivariate calculus), The World Wide Wade, 15:35
- Re: Smoothness of a quotient (multivariate calculus), The World Wide Wade, 15:21
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Herman Rubin, 15:11
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Herman Rubin, 15:04
- Re: Sums of Recursive Reciprocals, achava, 15:01
- Q: approximating cdf Normal by cdf Binomial, Axel Vogt, 14:56
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:55
- Re: Sums of Recursive Reciprocals, achava, 14:52
- Re: Sums of Recursive Reciprocals, A N Niel, 14:47
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Herman Rubin, 14:46
- Re: Fields of characteristic 2, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:43
- Find The Limit Involving Derivatives, Leroy Quet, 14:29
- Sums of Recursive Reciprocals, achava, 14:16
- Re: AN ODD DETERMINANT PROBLEM, Robert Israel, 14:15
- Re: Two little integrals, Herman Rubin, 14:08
- Re: 3n+1, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 14:07
- 3n+1, pdivos, 13:58
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 13:56
- Re: Smoothness of a quotient (multivariate calculus), Pereger, 13:47
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 13:47
- Re: Fields of characteristic 2, , 13:37
- Re: Please help with a diophant equation, leox, 13:29
- Re: scale transformation, jan hauben, 13:19
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Alan Morgan, 13:19
- Re: Relative Cardinality, fiesh, 13:18
- Re: JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:07
- Re: The brain is like a surface - a hypersurface - a maximum hypersurface., Mindpixel, 12:55
- Diagonalizing blocks of a unitary matrix, Konstantin Pankrashkin, 12:47
- Re: JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:40
- JSH: Publication in VINCI Journal Chiaroscuro, litsohate, 12:28
- Re: Please help with a diophant equation, Dana, 12:21
- Re: solve this "transcendental" quadratic polynomial equation, Ronald Bruck, 12:12
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 12:12
- Re: Axiom of choice for singletons?, David C . Ullrich, 12:10
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Randy Poe, 12:10
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jiri Lebl, 12:10
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 12:03
- Re: Axiom of choice for singletons?, David C . Ullrich, 11:57
- Re: Set theory problem, Hero, 11:57
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 11:53
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 11:36
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 11:28
- Re: Please help with a diophant equation, A N Niel, 11:26
- Axiom of choice for singletons?, Snis Pilbor, 11:25
- Re: the Reals really have negative curvature built-in and negative-Reals are superfluous, David McAnally, 11:10
- Re: what is the probability of getting at least a doubble six in 24 throws?, David Kastrup, 11:09
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, Helmut Richter, 10:59
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, stush, 10:56
- Please help with a diophant equation, leox, 10:51
- Re: 'nother probability question, Keith A. Lewis, 10:49
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 10:48
- Re: what is the probability of getting at least a doubble six in 24 throws?, Scoobidoo, 10:48
- Re: Fields of characteristic 2, Dik T. Winter, 10:42
- Re: scale transformation, eli . ipod, 10:36
- Re: Fields of characteristic 2, Lee Rudolph, 10:33
- Re: Smoothness of a quotient (multivariate calculus), David C . Ullrich, 10:20
- Fields of characteristic 2, Maury Barbato, 10:18
- Re: what is the probability of getting at least a doubble six in 24 throws?, David Kastrup, 10:06
- Re: a number between 0 and 1 is taken randomly. What is the probability for the first decimal is even?, spani, 10:05
- Re: Optimal Backgammon (was: Re: Game Theory), David C . Ullrich, 09:42
- Re: what is the probability of getting at least a doubble six in 24 throws?, Randy Poe, 09:39
- what is the probability of getting at least a doubble six in 24 throws?, Scoobidoo, 09:26
- Re: Help: A suitable set of postulates for High School Geometry, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:12
- Re: Help: A suitable set of postulates for High School Geometry, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 09:11
- Re: any guidance on trig problem?, Bart, 09:01
- Re: Circles and tangents! Need some help!, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, 08:51
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 08:42
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, john_ramsden, 08:27
- Re: Rendering the fall through event horizon, john_ramsden, 08:24
- Re: Smoothness of a quotient (multivariate calculus), Pereger, 07:56
- Atiyah&McDonald Question., Sirix, 07:50
- Re: AN ODD DETERMINANT PROBLEM, wheierman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 07:44
- Re: Help on inequality, OnlyRH, 07:37
- Smoothness of a quotient (multivariate calculus), Pereger, 07:16
- Re: a number between 0 and 1 is taken randomly. What is the probability for the first decimal is even?, David Kastrup, 07:06
- Re: Set theory problem, MJ, 06:56
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 06:54
- Re: a number between 0 and 1 is taken randomly. What is the probability for the first decimal is even?, José Carlos Santos, 06:39
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Han de Bruijn, 06:33
- a number between 0 and 1 is taken randomly. What is the probability for the first decimal is even?, Scoobidoo, 06:31
- Re: Polynomials and field extensions, viz, 06:30
- Re: Polynomials and field extensions, viz, 06:29
- Re: 13 cards are taken from a deck of 52 cards. what is the probability of neither getting an ace nor a king,queen and jack?, Scoobidoo, 06:28
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, steven, 06:26
- Re: scale transformation, jan hauben, 06:21
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, William Elliot, 06:20
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Han de Bruijn, 06:18
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Han de Bruijn, 06:13
- entropy H(X+Y), giojo81, 06:05
- Re: The brain is like a surface - a hypersurface - a maximum hypersurface., SPRThompson, 06:05
- Re: What does "top post" mean?, Alec McKenzie, 05:45
- What does "top post" mean?, Steve, 05:43
- New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 11, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster, 04:33
- Re: Hierarchical order of letters, O.H., 04:12
- Re: Help on inequality, OnlyRH, 04:10
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Timothy Little, 03:54
- Re: Vector Quadratic, alexandru . lupas, 03:28
- Re: infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, David McAnally, 03:18
- Re: The factoring problem, Johann Wiesenbauer, 03:09
- infinite cardinals: does well-ordering principal extend?, Snis Pilbor, 02:55
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Mike Kent, 02:24
- Re: solve this "transcendental" quadratic polynomial equation, Ronald Bruck, 01:45
- Re: solve this "transcendental" quadratic polynomial equation, Robert Israel, 01:26
- Re: Optimal Backgammon (was: Re: Game Theory), Keith Ramsay, 00:42
- Re: solve this "transcendental" quadratic polynomial equation, spani, 00:10
July 10, 2005
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:53
- Re: scale transformation, Lynn Kurtz, 23:49
- Re: Two little integrals, Dave Seaman, 23:21
- Re: weirdest mathematician: Is math a disease?, Joseph Hertzlinger, 23:10
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Joseph Hertzlinger, 23:09
- Re: solve this "transcendental" quadratic polynomial equation, kentonyee, 23:08
- Re: Two little integrals, David Moran, 22:57
- Re: Two little integrals, novelo, 22:49
- Re: Diophantine equation, Steve, 22:48
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 22:43
- Re: solve this "transcendental" quadratic polynomial equation, yimie boy, 22:29
- Re: baffled by //N bug in mathematica, WHY?, David W . Cantrell, 22:05
- Re: Vector Quadratic, Virgil, 21:27
- Re: The factoring problem, Unruh, 21:16
- Vector Quadratic, cacoyi, 21:07
- solve this "transcendental" quadratic polynomial equation, kentonyee, 21:01
- Re: What calculus text should I cite for l'Hopital's Rule?, Anon, 20:59
- Re: Simple problem, Rick Decker, 20:55
- Re: Optimal Backgammon (was: Re: Game Theory), Keith Ramsay, 20:42
- Re: Simple nonlinear PDE. Please help?, Eric Gisse, 20:40
- Re: a question in linear algebra about matrices..., Tomlev, 20:34
- Re: Two little integrals, Anon, 19:45
- A Reverse Integer Triangle, Consecutive Integer Sums, And Potential Primes, rer, 19:36
- Re: Two little integrals, john_ramsden, 19:33
- Re: Two little integrals, Virgil, 19:32
- Re: Simple problem, David Kastrup, 19:24
- Re: Two little integrals, john_ramsden, 19:23
- Re: Simple problem, Virgil, 19:21
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 19:21
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 19:18
- Re: Simple problem, Proginoskes, 19:12
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 19:12
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 19:11
- Re: Two little integrals, Lynn Kurtz, 19:10
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 19:05
- Re: People are stupid, David Kastrup, 19:03
- Re: Two little integrals, David Moran, 19:03
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Randy Poe, 18:55
- Two little integrals, novelo, 18:52
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Proginoskes, 18:45
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jiri Lebl, 18:45
- Re: People are stupid, examachine, 18:45
- Re: What calculus text should I cite for l'Hopital's Rule?, Jim Spriggs, 18:41
- Re: a question in linear algebra about matrices..., The World Wide Wade, 18:36
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, double d, 18:30
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, double d, 18:26
- Re: What calculus text should I cite for l'Hopital's Rule?, Proginoskes, 18:20
- Re: Simple problem, David Kastrup, 18:18
- Re: Professional Advice on Solving these Equations Would be Appreciated, Eugene Shubert, 18:15
- Re: The factoring problem, Proginoskes, 18:14
- Re: Simple problem, Mike Terry, 18:12
- Re: Professional Advice on Solving these Equations Would be Appreciated, Eugene Shubert, 18:12
- Re: Simple problem, Tony, 18:07
- Re: People are stupid, Matt Timmermans, 18:01
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture - Yet Another Proof, luiroto, 18:00
- Re: To George Ghiata, fernando revilla, 17:55
- Re: Mathematical concepts, Herman Rubin, 17:52
- baffled by //N bug in mathematica, WHY?, symbio, 17:50
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 17:49
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jiri Lebl, 17:45
- Re: weirdest mathematician quirks, Bob Cain, 17:27
- Re: Prime number lists, David Kastrup, 17:27
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, beliavsky, 17:27
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Herman Rubin, 17:25
- Re: How long do you think it will take..., Herman Rubin, 17:22
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Herman Rubin, 17:16
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Chucky Invalid, 17:16
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:10
- Re: People are stupid, Herman Rubin, 17:08
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jesse F. Hughes, 17:03
- Re: weirdest mathematician quirks, Dan Piponi, 16:53
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 16:51
- Re: Simple problem, David Kastrup, 16:49
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, double d, 16:47
- Curiosity involving 2^(1/3), rich burge, 16:47
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Mike Hochster, 16:44
- What calculus text should I cite for l'Hopital's Rule?, Dan Piponi, 16:43
- Re: Prime number lists, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:39
- Re: Simple problem, Hugo Pfoertner, 16:28
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:23
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:21
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, Jesse F. Hughes, 16:10
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Mike Hochster, 16:09
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Mike Hochster, 16:07
- Re: probability distribution question., david bandel, 16:07
- Re: probability distribution question., david bandel, 16:05
- Re: weirdest mathematician: Is math a disease?, double d, 16:04
- Re: Simple problem, david bandel, 16:04
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, David Kastrup, 16:01
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 15:58
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, double d, 15:58
- Re: People are stupid, Herman Rubin, 15:53
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Mike Hochster, 15:53
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, double d, 15:52
- Re: Simple nonlinear PDE. Please help?, Robert Israel, 15:38
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:27
- Re: weirdest mathematician: Is math a disease?, Wayne Brown, 15:20
- Simple problem, C. Bond, 15:18
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:15
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:03
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Torkel Franzen, 14:59
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 14:58
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Jim Spriggs, 14:56
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:56
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:54
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:49
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:39
- Re: 'nother probability question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:34
- Re: Mathematical concepts, John Smith, 14:33
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:30
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 14:28
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:25
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 14:24
- Re: People are stupid, tonyp, 14:21
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, Jesse F. Hughes, 14:17
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, double d, 14:01
- Re: 'nother probability question, jan hauben, 13:52
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 13:48
- Re: To George Ghiata, Daniel McLaury, 13:47
- Re: 'nother probability question, jan hauben, 13:45
- Re: a question in linear algebra about matrices..., David C . Ullrich, 13:44
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, David C . Ullrich, 13:37
- Re: a question in linear algebra about matrices..., Lee Rudolph, 13:34
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 13:24
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, Jesse F. Hughes, 13:22
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 13:15
- Re: probability distribution question., david bandel, 13:08
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 13:06
- Re: a question in linear algebra about matrices..., Jim Burns, 13:01
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Dylan Sung, 12:59
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Dylan Sung, 12:53
- Re: probability distribution question., David Kastrup, 12:50
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, double d, 12:43
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, Jesse F. Hughes, 12:27
- Re: a question in linear algebra about matrices..., Tomlev, 12:19
- Re: probability distribution question., david bandel, 12:05
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jiri Lebl, 12:02
- Re: any guidance on trig problem?, Angelo Ricotta, 11:46
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 11:39
- Re: The factoring problem, Paul Rubin, 11:38
- Re: Probability/Measure Theory question, David C . Ullrich, 11:25
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jiri Lebl, 11:17
- Re: Optimal Backgammon (was: Re: Game Theory), David C . Ullrich, 11:12
- Over 80% Savings on ALL best-selling Win XP titles, "Dean Boston", 10:22
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, double d, 10:15
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Martin Shobe, 10:14
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Martin Shobe, 09:58
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Martin Shobe, 09:52
- Re: Relative Cardinality, fiesh, 08:20
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Rolf Albinger, 08:17
- Re: Simple nonlinear PDE. Please help?, William Elliot, 08:05
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 08:01
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Randy Poe, 08:00
- Re: Professional Advice on Solving these Equations Would be Appreciated, Timothy Little, 07:56
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:41
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 07:37
- Re: Optimal Backgammon (was: Re: Game Theory), Keith Ramsay, 07:33
- Re: Relative Cardinality, David Kastrup, 07:31
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:31
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:29
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:26
- Re: Simple nonlinear PDE. Please help?, G. A. Edgar, 07:26
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:21
- Re: Simple nonlinear PDE. Please help?, William Elliot, 07:20
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:15
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 07:13
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, David Kastrup, 07:10
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 07:10
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 07:02
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 07:01
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 06:47
- Re: Polynomials and field extensions, Timothy Murphy, 06:25
- Re: a question in linear algebra about matrices..., José Carlos Santos, 06:22
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Timothy Murphy, 06:17
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 06:15
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 06:13
- Re: Force is a thrust, not a pull, Rela Tivity, 06:05
- a question in linear algebra about matrices..., Tomlev, 05:53
- Simple nonlinear PDE. Please help?, Eric Gisse, 04:56
- Re: dual of Banach space, Robert Israel, 04:22
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Mike Kent, 04:04
- Re: Sum of "n" random variables., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 04:02
- Re: probability distribution question., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:42
- Re: Rendering the fall through event horizon, Keith Ramsay, 03:26
- Re: The factoring problem, RichD, 03:11
- Re: Professional Advice on Solving these Equations Would be Appreciated, Gib Bogle, 02:45
- Re: branch points and sheets, Li Yi, 02:29
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, Jesse F. Hughes, 02:29
- branch points and sheets, Li Yi, 02:24
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:21
- Re: Sum of "n" random variables., david bandel, 02:07
- Re: Rendering the fall through event horizon, Timothy Little, 02:00
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Clifford Nelson, 01:55
- Re: probability distribution question., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 01:55
- Re: Polynomials and field extensions, Tonico, 01:54
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Steve, 01:47
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Proginoskes, 01:42
- Re: Sum of "n" random variables., Proginoskes, 01:37
- Re: Variation on |V|-|E|+|R|=chi=2-2g, Steve, 01:37
- Re: strange problem, Proginoskes, 01:28
- Re: Mandlhebrot set, HeadsUp!@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:19
- Re: Variation on |V|-|E|+|R|=chi=2-2g, Proginoskes, 01:18
- Re: Mandlhebrot set, Narcoleptic Insomniac, 01:15
- Re: probability distribution question., david bandel, 01:15
- Re: Help on inequality, Proginoskes, 01:14
- Re: Professional Advice on Solving these Equations Would be Appreciated, Timothy Little, 01:05
- Re: Help: A suitable set of postulates for High School Geometry, William Elliot, 01:04
- Re: probability distribution question., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:04
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Mike Hochster, 00:56
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Mike Hochster, 00:50
- Re: Mathematical concepts, William Elliot, 00:48
- Re: How long do you think it will take..., Daniel Ryan, 00:48
- Re: probability distribution question., C6L1V@xxxxxxx, 00:32
- Re: solvable sextic equations, William Elliot, 00:23
- Re: probability distribution question., david bandel, 00:22
- Re: A giant meteor is about to strike the earth, djarvinen, 00:17
- Re: How long do you think it will take..., William Elliot, 00:14
- Re: Laws of Indices, William Elliot, 00:08
July 09, 2005
- Re: probability distribution question., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:57
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, gerard46, 23:45
- Re: Help: A suitable set of postulates for High School Geometry, Anon, 23:43
- Re: Mandlhebrot set, XGR131, 23:40
- Re: probability distribution question., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:35
- Sum of "n" random variables., david bandel, 23:23
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:21
- Re: probability distribution question., david bandel, 22:15
- Re: probability distribution question., david bandel, 22:13
- Re: Rendering the fall through event horizon, Tony, 21:56
- Re: Help: A suitable set of postulates for High School Geometry, Ronald Bruck, 21:54
- Re: Inequality with non-negative polynomials,, alexandru . lupas, 21:52
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 21:48
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:36
- Re: probability distribution question., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 21:33
- Re: Professional Advice on Solving these Equations Would be Appreciated, Gib Bogle, 21:30
- Mandlhebrot set, Brendan O'Sullivan, 21:27
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 21:26
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, ediebur, 21:22
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Sensei, 21:07
- probability distribution question., david bandel, 20:34
- How long do you think it will take..., Daniel Ryan, 20:25
- Re: A giant meteor is about to strike the earth, Gib Bogle, 20:02
- Re: People are stupid, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:53
- Re: Prime lists and Computation, Dik T. Winter, 19:45
- Re: People are stupid, Karl M. Bunday, 19:29
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Timothy Little, 19:27
- Re: Help: A suitable set of postulates for High School Geometry, Karl M. Bunday, 19:21
- Re: People are stupid, Konrad Viltersten, 19:19
- strange problem, n3wb1e, 19:16
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Karl M. Bunday, 19:10
- Re: solvable sextic equations, bischar, 19:09
- Re: Laws of Indices, Brendan O'Sullivan, 19:04
- Re: Laws of Indices, William Elliot, 18:54
- Re: People are stupid, RichD, 18:54
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 18:41
- solvable sextic equations, William Elliot, 18:41
- Re: Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Jim Spriggs, 18:40
- John Thomas Gunner Levorson - April 9th 1936, I'm Such A Big Big Merrie Amsterburg Fan, 18:37
- Re: A giant meteor is about to strike the earth, bischar, 18:35
- Best Maths Computer Programming Language, Michael, 18:30
- Re: People are stupid, RichD, 18:27
- Re: Rendering the fall through event horizon, Ioannis, 18:26
- Re: People are stupid, RichD, 18:23
- Re: People are stupid, RichD, 18:19
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, double d, 18:16
- Re: Variation on |V|-|E|+|R|=chi=2-2g, Steve, 18:14
- Re: People are stupid, RichD, 18:10
- Re: A giant meteor is about to strike the earth, Gib Bogle, 17:58
- Re: 'nother probability question, Proginoskes, 17:35
- Re: A giant meteor is about to strike the earth, Proginoskes, 17:32
- Re: A giant meteor is about to strike the earth, Proginoskes, 17:27
- Re: Help on inequality, Proginoskes, 17:20
- Re: Help: A suitable set of postulates for High School Geometry, Herman Rubin, 17:17
- Re: dual of Banach space, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:36
- Re: Sine and cosine equations., Virgil, 16:35
- Re: Sine and cosine equations., David Kastrup, 16:19
- Re: 13 cards are taken from a deck of 52 cards. what is the probability of neither getting an ace nor a king,queen and jack?, John Gabbriel, 16:13
- Re: Adding White Noise (Gaussian Noise) To A Set Of 3d Points, Randy Poe, 16:12
- Sine and cosine equations., novelo, 16:11
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 15:51
- Rendering the fall through event horizon, Tony, 15:44
- Re: Professional Advice on Solving these Equations Would be Appreciated, Eugene Shubert, 15:39
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 15:29
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, Jesse F. Hughes, 15:09
- Re: Probability/Measure Theory question, Tom Huckstep, 15:01
- Re: any guidance on trig problem?, Anon, 15:00
- Re: Probability/Measure Theory question, Tom Huckstep, 14:59
- Mathematical concepts, Herman Rubin, 14:57
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Virgil, 14:54
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, Jeremy Boden, 14:52
- Laws of Indices, Brendan O'Sullivan, 14:39
- Re: Back to balls and urns, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 14:34
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Jan de Vos, 14:33
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, fernando revilla, 14:24
- Re: Back to balls and urns, Chip Eastham, 14:22
- Re: Probability/Measure Theory question, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:13
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture - Yet Another Proof, Saint Cad, 14:11
- Re: Dini's theorem, Justin Young, 14:10
- Re: Dini's theorem, Justin Young, 14:09
- Re: 'nother probability question, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:48
- Adding White Noise (Gaussian Noise) To A Set Of 3d Points, Adam Hartshorne, 13:48
- Re: solvable sextic equations, Alain Pichereau, 13:27
- Re: Prime number lists, steven, 13:17
- Re: 13 cards are taken from a deck of 52 cards. what is the probability of neither getting an ace nor a king,queen and jack?, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 13:06
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv, 12:59
- Re: Prime number lists, Johann Wiesenbauer, 12:56
- Re: [Algebra] ``Sum'' meaning question, Sensei, 12:42
- Professional Advice on Solving these Equations Would be Appreciated, Eugene Shubert, 12:26
- Re: A giant meteor is about to strike the earth, bischar, 12:20
- Re: Discussion: What are foundations of math?, twisted_snakes, 12:13
- Re: A giant meteor is about to strike the earth, bischar, 12:04
- Re: Probability/Measure Theory question, David C . Ullrich, 12:01
- Re: Inequality with non-negative polynomials,, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 11:49
- Re: A giant meteor is about to strike the earth, bischar, 11:48
- Re: 'nother probability question, steven, 11:47
- Re: A giant meteor is about to strike the earth, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:43
- Re: Probability/Measure Theory question, David C . Ullrich, 11:36
- Re: 'nother probability question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:34
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 11:30
- Re: Relative Cardinality, mueckenh, 11:29
- Re: Prime lists and Computation, Helmut Richter, 11:19
- A giant meteor is about to strike the earth, djarvinen, 11:18
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, Jesse F. Hughes, 11:18
- Re: 'nother probability question, jan hauben, 11:12
- 'nother probability question, steven, 11:03
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Jiri Lebl, 11:01
- Re:A different RSA challenge, Dan, 10:37
- Re: any guidance on trig problem?, Angelo Ricotta, 10:28
- Re: Discussion: What are foundations of math?, Jim Spriggs, 10:10
- Re: 13 cards are taken from a deck of 52 cards. what is the probability of neither getting an ace nor a king,queen and jack?, jan hauben, 10:10
- Re: 13 cards are taken from a deck of 52 cards. what is the probability of neither getting an ace nor a king,queen and jack?, Scoobidoo, 09:47
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 09:42
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 09:36
- Re: 13 cards are taken from a deck of 52 cards. what is the probability of neither getting an ace nor a king,queen and jack?, jan hauben, 09:24
- Probability/Measure Theory question, Tom Huckstep, 09:21
- Re: Dini's theorem, José Carlos Santos, 09:20
- Re: Prime number lists, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:17
- Re: 13 cards are taken from a deck of 52 cards. what is the probability of neither getting an ace nor a king,queen and jack?, jan hauben, 09:12
- Re: Dini's theorem, matthias, 09:06
- Re: 13 cards are taken from a deck of 52 cards. what is the probability of neither getting an ace nor a king,queen and jack?, Scoobidoo, 09:05
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, double d, 08:51
- Re: 13 cards are taken from a deck of 52 cards. what is the probability of neither getting an ace nor a king,queen and jack?, jan hauben, 08:50
- Re: Prime number lists, steven, 08:33
- 13 cards are taken from a deck of 52 cards. what is the probability of neither getting an ace nor a king,queen and jack?, Scoobidoo, 08:27
- Re: Prime number lists, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:56
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, fernando revilla, 07:11
- Re: periodic points, G. A. Edgar, 06:37
- Re: Julia Sets, A N Niel, 06:32
- Re: Julia Sets, Ioannis, 06:26
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Rolf Albinger, 06:20
- Re: periodic points, Ioannis, 06:05
- Re: Julia Sets, Ioannis, 05:57
- Re: Help: A suitable set of postulates for High School Geometry, Lee Rudolph, 05:52
- Re: Forecasting value of an used car, Jesse F. Hughes, 05:29
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Ioannis, 05:28
- Re: Probability to finish last, Carl Parkes, 05:07
- Re: searching for a functional form, newsquestions2003, 04:22
- Re: Dini's theorem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 04:16
- Re: Dini's theorem, José Carlos Santos, 04:11
- Inequality with non-negative polynomials,, alexandru . lupas, 04:09
- Dini's theorem, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 03:35
- Re: People are stupid, Konrad Viltersten, 03:33
- Discussion: What are foundations of math?, Victor Porton, 03:04
- Re: People are stupid, lysdexia, 02:33
- Re: periodic points, J Jensen, 01:50
- Re: Variation on |V|-|E|+|R|=chi=2-2g, Proginoskes, 01:48
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, Proginoskes, 01:30
- Bruce Fredrick Sparling - June 10th 1960, I'm A Big Merrie Amsterburg Fan, 01:28
- Re: Topology question; absolute extensor, absolute retract, William Elliot, 01:24
- Re: People are stupid, Proginoskes, 00:58
- Re: The factoring problem, Proginoskes, 00:53
- Re: expected value of a Trailing Stop, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:51
- Re: searching for a functional form, Proginoskes, 00:40
- Re: modulus, Virgil, 00:39
- Re: expected value of a Trailing Stop, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:35
- Kimberly Dawn Waite - April 5th 1980, I'm Such A Big Big Merrie Amsterburg Fan, 00:26
- Re: Linear Algebra/ Group Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:19
- Re: Linear Algebra/ Group Theory, Jannick Asmus, 00:08
- Re: Help: A suitable set of postulates for High School Geometry, Ronald Bruck, 00:06
July 08, 2005
- Re: modulus, Mkajuma, 23:56
- Linear Algebra/ Group Theory, Mkajuma, 23:51
- Re: weirdest mathematician: Is math a disease?, double d, 23:30
- Variation on |V|-|E|+|R|=chi=2-2g, steve, 22:37
- Re: modulus, Brendan O'Sullivan, 22:12
- Re: periodic points, Virgil, 21:46
- Re: modulus, Virgil, 21:39
- periodic points, Brendan O'Sullivan, 21:36
- Julia Sets, Brendan O'Sullivan, 21:32
- modulus, Brendan O'Sullivan, 21:25
- Re: Help on inequality, OnlyRH, 21:14
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Timothy Little, 21:11
- Re: The Functional Equation, Timothy Little, 21:04
- Re: Views of the mathematical reality in eastern religions/philosophies?, Keith Ramsay, 20:56
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 20:48
- Back to balls and urns, Stephen J. Herschkorn, 20:45
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 20:34
- Re: Advanced simplification question, Leonhard Vogt, 20:28
- Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Timothy Little, 20:20
- Quaternion/Floretion Algebra Multiplication Program, Dement, 20:10
- Re: dual of Banach space, Robert Israel, 20:01
- Re: mapping contraction, Brendan O'Sullivan, 19:51
- Re: dual of Banach space, don, 19:48
- Re: Impression of planitude, jan hauben, 19:22
- Re: Diophantine equation, Steve, 19:21
- Re: dual of Banach space, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 19:08
- Re: Probability to finish last, Robert Israel, 18:45
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Dik T. Winter, 18:43
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 18:39
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 18:34
- Re: Impression of planitude, MathNathanael, 18:30
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 18:08
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, fernando revilla, 18:08
- RE: The OEM Software Licensing Site-MS 2003 Technologies, "Fleisher", 17:48
- Re: dual of Banach space, don, 17:38
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, bryant_j_j, 17:31
- Re: Question -- algorithms for multiplying a sequence of similar numbers, Keith A. Lewis, 17:21
- Re: Simple Harmonic motion, jan hauben, 17:15
- Topology question; absolute extensor, absolute retract, Daisuke Toriumi, 17:11
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:00
- Question -- algorithms for multiplying a sequence of similar numbers, trium235, 16:55
- Re: Probability to finish last, ogl100, 16:42
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, Thomas Baruchel, 16:29
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, Rama-42, 16:27
- Simple Harmonic motion, Brendan O'Sullivan, 16:15
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, jEE, 16:13
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, Rouben Rostamian, 16:07
- Impression of planitude, bischar, 16:07
- Re: Any algebric expression for sorting?, brian_james_kirby, 16:05
- [Algebra] ``Sum'' meaning question, Sensei, 16:04
- Re: People are stupid, John Smith, 15:50
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 15:27
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 15:16
- Re: expected value of a Trailing Stop, Robert Israel, 14:46
- Re: The factoring problem, Unruh, 14:36
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 14:17
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Mike Hochster, 14:14
- Re: A different RSA challenge!, Torkel Franzen, 14:13
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Mike Hochster, 14:13
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, Virgil, 14:00
- Re: The Math Behind IQ Tests, Herman Rubin, 13:56
- Re: Any algebric expression for sorting?, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 13:49
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 13:43
- Re: Prime number lists, Johann Wiesenbauer, 13:40
- Re: Any algebric expression for sorting?, brian_james_kirby, 13:40
- Re: Probability to finish last, James Burns, 13:35
- Re: A different RSA challenge!, Herman Rubin, 13:35
- Re: People are stupid, Herman Rubin, 13:28
- Re: Probability to finish last, Todor, 13:22
- Re: The Functional Equation, ogl100, 13:13
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, Lord Jim, 13:13
- Re: Views of the mathematical reality in eastern religions/philosophies?, Awaken21, 13:11
- Re: A different RSA challenge!, Keith A. Lewis, 13:08
- Re: expected value of a Trailing Stop, analyst41, 12:55
- Re: People are stupid, Herman Rubin, 12:44
- Re: People are stupid, Folsom Inmate, 12:42
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 12:41
- Re: Prime number lists, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:35
- Re: Probability to finish last, briggs, 12:30
- Re: People are stupid, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:27
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, fernando revilla, 12:23
- Re: Prime number lists, Lynn Kurtz, 12:21
- Re: Any algebric expression for sorting?, Nora Baron, 12:15
- Re: Any algebric expression for sorting?, Ignoramus15786, 11:59
- Re: A different RSA challenge!, Dan, 11:59
- Re: Finding the general term of a sequence, jan hauben, 11:57
- Re: Any algebric expression for sorting?, brian_james_kirby, 11:55
- Re: Relative Cardinality, denis feldmann, 11:53
- Re: Any algebric expression for sorting?, brian_james_kirby, 11:50
- Re: A different RSA challenge!, Torkel Franzen, 11:46
- Re: Probability to finish last, Todor, 11:34
- Re: A different RSA challenge!, Dan, 11:30
- Re: I'm puzzled (Q on norms of matrices), G. A. Edgar, 11:22
- Re: Progressions: Was: Re: Circles and tangents! Need some help!, Daniel McLaury, 11:17
- Re: convex function help, Randy Poe, 11:10
- Re: Relative Cardinality, Jiri Lebl, 11:08
- Re: I'm puzzled (Q on norms of matrices), Gonçalo Rodrigues, 11:07
- Re: Probability to finish last, briggs, 11:06
- Re: Steven Cullinane's "Diamond Theory", richard miller, 11:05
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, Michael Orion, 10:56
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, Jean-Claude Arbaut, 10:54
- Re: Optimal Backgammon (was: Re: Game Theory), David C . Ullrich, 10:36
- Re: A different RSA challenge!, stush, 10:36
- Re: basic linear algebra question, David C . Ullrich, 10:33
- Re: expected value of a Trailing Stop, briggs, 10:30
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 10:29
- Re: Prime number lists, Dave Rusin, 10:29
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree, mueckenh, 10:26
- Re: People are stupid, David C . Ullrich, 10:26
- Polynomials and field extensions, viz, 10:26
- Re: Probability to finish last, Dave Rusin, 10:22
- Re: HISTORICAL CHALLENGE TO MR>ANDREW WILES ABOUT FLT, george ghiata, 10:15
- Re: People are stupid, John Smith, 10:13
- Irrationality measure - Khinchin's proof, Marco Dalai, 10:04